WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome deep divers. Imagine a moment, a real turning point,

2
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:09.279
<v Speaker 1>not a war, but an idea that just completely shook

3
00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the financial world.

4
00:00:10.519 --> 00:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm challenging, you know, the whole concept of

5
00:00:13.080 --> 00:00:15.359
<v Speaker 2>needing a central authority for things.

6
00:00:15.080 --> 00:00:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, and it's set the stage for something totally new, a.

7
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:20.519
<v Speaker 2>Real conceptual earthquake, wasn't it, Especially coming out of that

8
00:00:20.519 --> 00:00:23.519
<v Speaker 2>period of well deep distrust in the old systems.

9
00:00:23.559 --> 00:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You hit the nail on the head. It made everyone

10
00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:30.519
<v Speaker 1>ask who's really in charge here? Where's the accountability? And

11
00:00:30.559 --> 00:00:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that fundamental shift that questioning is exactly what we're diving

12
00:00:34.479 --> 00:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>into today, the world of blockchain and decentralized applications DAPs.

13
00:00:39.560 --> 00:00:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Right. It started with digital currency bitcoin being the obvious one,

14
00:00:42.920 --> 00:00:46.200
<v Speaker 2>but now it's becoming this foundational layer for like a

15
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>whole new generation of software. It's moving way beyond just money.

16
00:00:50.119 --> 00:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Yeah. So our mission today we want to cut

17
00:00:53.000 --> 00:00:56.079
<v Speaker 1>through the jargon, give you the really essential nuggets, and

18
00:00:56.119 --> 00:00:59.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe uncover some surprising ways these technologies are changing things.

19
00:00:59.399 --> 00:01:03.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everything from banking to data sharing, even social media.

20
00:01:03.359 --> 00:01:05.519
<v Speaker 2>The goal is that you walk away not just knowing

21
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the buzzwords, but actually getting why they matter. Why they

22
00:01:09.560 --> 00:01:10.159
<v Speaker 2>matter to you.

23
00:01:10.439 --> 00:01:13.239
<v Speaker 1>And we've got a great guide for this exploration the

24
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>book Building Decentralized Blockchain Applications Learn how to use Blockchain

25
00:01:18.359 --> 00:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as the foundation for net gen Apps by Shaheed Shake.

26
00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's unpack this sounds good? So we hear these terms

27
00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 1>all the time, immutable, decentralized. For listeners already kind of

28
00:01:29.079 --> 00:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>following the space, what's the really revolutionary part about these

29
00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Where do they genuinely shift the power?

30
00:01:35.159 --> 00:01:38.799
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question because, Okay, at its core, blockchain

31
00:01:39.040 --> 00:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is this immutable distributed ledger right records linked cryptographically peer

32
00:01:43.599 --> 00:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>to peer. But the revolution isn't just what it is,

33
00:01:46.439 --> 00:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>it's what it allows. Immutable means once data is confirmed,

34
00:01:50.319 --> 00:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>validated by the network, it's basically set in stone, can't

35
00:01:53.280 --> 00:01:53.719
<v Speaker 2>be altered.

36
00:01:53.799 --> 00:01:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Okay, locked in.

37
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:58.879
<v Speaker 2>And decentralized means no single boss, no central server, no

38
00:01:59.079 --> 00:02:02.799
<v Speaker 2>company calling all the shots. The network participants are in control.

39
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:05.079
<v Speaker 1>So that's the power shift exactly.

40
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:08.039
<v Speaker 2>It shifts who holds the power and where the trust lies.

41
00:02:08.520 --> 00:02:11.199
<v Speaker 2>Instead of, you know, blindly trusting a bank or a

42
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>big tech company, you're relying on math, on cryptographic proof

43
00:02:15.080 --> 00:02:16.159
<v Speaker 2>and distributed agreement.

44
00:02:16.360 --> 00:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Moving from institutional trust to mathematical certainty. I like that

45
00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>powerful concept trusting the code, the network's crypto, instead of

46
00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a corporation. And the book highlights this interesting mix of

47
00:02:28.680 --> 00:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>anonymity and transparency.

48
00:02:30.479 --> 00:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, you as a user are anonymous, just identified by

49
00:02:34.680 --> 00:02:40.039
<v Speaker 2>these long cryptographic hashes, these addresses. But every transaction, every

50
00:02:40.159 --> 00:02:44.159
<v Speaker 2>piece of data added is out there publicly viewable on

51
00:02:44.199 --> 00:02:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the ledger, so you get this verifiable proof of ownership

52
00:02:48.039 --> 00:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>or proof that something happened provenance.

53
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The strange paradox, isn't it anonymous users transparent actions?

54
00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:56.479
<v Speaker 2>It really is. And the origin story just fascinating. You

55
00:02:56.520 --> 00:02:57.680
<v Speaker 2>have to think back to two thousand and.

56
00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight financial crisis exactly, global.

57
00:02:59.759 --> 00:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Rest session banks, failing trust in those big institutions just evaporating.

58
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:07.319
<v Speaker 1>That was the climate, the perfect storm for a radical.

59
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Idea, precisely, and into that steps this anonymous figure, Satoshi Nakamoto,

60
00:03:12.199 --> 00:03:14.199
<v Speaker 2>proposing this completely different system.

61
00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't just about creating Bitcoin the currency. It

62
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:19.159
<v Speaker 1>was a statement, wasn't it That message in the first block?

63
00:03:19.240 --> 00:03:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, the Genesis block message the Times three jan

64
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:25.719
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and nine, Chancellor on the brink of second

65
00:03:25.719 --> 00:03:26.719
<v Speaker 2>bailout for banks.

66
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, talk about making a point right.

67
00:03:29.879 --> 00:03:32.039
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't just a time stamp. It was a direct

68
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>challenge to the whole traditional debt based financial system. Here's

69
00:03:36.560 --> 00:03:38.439
<v Speaker 2>an alternative, peer to peer.

70
00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Trustless marking a new era definitely.

71
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:44.319
<v Speaker 2>But you know, while Bitcoin felt revolutionary, the building blocks

72
00:03:44.360 --> 00:03:49.319
<v Speaker 2>weren't entirely new. Ideas around distributed computing, cryptography, consensus, those

73
00:03:49.319 --> 00:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>had been around since the nineties.

74
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So Stoci's genius was putting them together.

75
00:03:52.759 --> 00:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Kind of Yeah, combining things like mercle trees, which were

76
00:03:55.599 --> 00:03:59.199
<v Speaker 2>used for secure document time stamping, and hashcash, an early

77
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>proof of work idea to stop email spam. So Toshi

78
00:04:02.120 --> 00:04:05.639
<v Speaker 2>combine these existing pieces into this elegant working system that

79
00:04:05.800 --> 00:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>solve the problem of digital trust without needing a middleman.

80
00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So with those mechanics established, the book points out

81
00:04:11.919 --> 00:04:15.159
<v Speaker 1>that not all blockchains are the same, they're different types.

82
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's important. You've got your public blockchains think Bitcoin

83
00:04:19.720 --> 00:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Ethereum open door policy, anyone can join, read the ledger,

84
00:04:24.199 --> 00:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>submit transactions.

85
00:04:25.600 --> 00:04:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And they use things like proof of work.

86
00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Typically yeah, which needs a lot of computing power. That

87
00:04:30.199 --> 00:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>makes them super decentralized and secure, but also you know

88
00:04:33.439 --> 00:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>slower sometimes.

89
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, then what's next?

90
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Then you have federated or consortium blockchains. These are more

91
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:43.360
<v Speaker 2>like a private club for a group of organizations. Ah,

92
00:04:43.399 --> 00:04:46.279
<v Speaker 2>so permission is needed, right, you need permission to read

93
00:04:46.360 --> 00:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>or write. Since it's a smaller known group of participants,

94
00:04:49.839 --> 00:04:52.399
<v Speaker 2>they tend to be faster and more efficient. Good for

95
00:04:52.480 --> 00:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>industry collaborations where you need some control but still want shared.

96
00:04:55.839 --> 00:04:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Truth makes sense.

97
00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:00.279
<v Speaker 2>And the last type private blockchains. These are usually run

98
00:05:00.319 --> 00:05:02.639
<v Speaker 2>by a single organization just for internal use.

99
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:05.199
<v Speaker 1>They set all the rules, so most centralized.

100
00:05:05.439 --> 00:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Definitely the most centralized of the three. They still get

101
00:05:08.319 --> 00:05:11.879
<v Speaker 2>the immutability and crypto security benefits, but it's all controlled

102
00:05:11.879 --> 00:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>by one entity. Often used for things like internal audits

103
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:18.480
<v Speaker 2>or tracking goods within a company's own supply chain.

104
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So the choice really depends on what you need, right,

105
00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that trade off between decentralization speed privacy.

106
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, it's a strategic decision, not just a technical one.

107
00:05:28.879 --> 00:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so different types, but how does the basic process work.

108
00:05:31.839 --> 00:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say I want to send some crypto walk us

109
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:35.079
<v Speaker 1>through that transactions journey.

110
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Sure it starts with you acting as a node. A

111
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:42.079
<v Speaker 2>node is really just any computer running the blockchain software.

112
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Could be a laptop, could be a huge data.

113
00:05:44.079 --> 00:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Center, so a participant in the network, right.

114
00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:49.199
<v Speaker 2>And the more nodes, the stronger the network. So you

115
00:05:49.279 --> 00:05:52.519
<v Speaker 2>initiate your transaction and includes an ID which is a hash.

116
00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>The sender and receiver addresses also hashes, keeping it anonymous exactly,

117
00:05:56.720 --> 00:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>no personal info, just those hashes plus the amount network fees,

118
00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>and your digital signature basically assigned hash proving it's you.

119
00:06:04.240 --> 00:06:06.720
<v Speaker 2>You broadcast the same podcast it where to the network

120
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>to the other nodes. Then special nodes called miners pick

121
00:06:11.360 --> 00:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>up your transaction along with others that are waiting.

122
00:06:13.920 --> 00:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>What do they do with them?

123
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>They gather these transactions and put them into a potential block.

124
00:06:18.759 --> 00:06:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Think of it like grouping checks to be deposited.

125
00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Okay, a batch of transaction yep.

126
00:06:22.959 --> 00:06:25.519
<v Speaker 2>Now to get this block officially added to the ledger,

127
00:06:25.839 --> 00:06:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the miners have to compete. If it's a proof of

128
00:06:28.759 --> 00:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>work system like Bitcoin, they're racing to solve a really

129
00:06:32.759 --> 00:06:34.879
<v Speaker 2>hard cryptographic puzzle.

130
00:06:34.639 --> 00:06:35.439
<v Speaker 1>The hash puzzle.

131
00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:38.399
<v Speaker 2>That's the one. They're trying to find a specific hash

132
00:06:38.480 --> 00:06:42.399
<v Speaker 2>value for that block. And crucially, this hash includes the

133
00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:44.439
<v Speaker 2>hash of the previous block in the chain.

134
00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Ah, that's the chain part linking them together precisely.

135
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>That cryptographic link makes the history tamper proof, so one

136
00:06:52.519 --> 00:06:57.439
<v Speaker 2>miner eventually finds the winning hash. What next they showed eureka, huh,

137
00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:01.839
<v Speaker 2>maybe they broadcast their new solved block, the proposed page

138
00:07:01.839 --> 00:07:03.839
<v Speaker 2>for the ledger to the whole network.

139
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Everyone just trusts, no way.

140
00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>That's the key. Other nodes all across the network independently

141
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:12.399
<v Speaker 2>check the work. They verify the hash, They verify all

142
00:07:12.439 --> 00:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the transactions inside the block.

143
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, peer review exactly.

144
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>And if a majority usually fifty one percent of the

145
00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:22.519
<v Speaker 2>network power agrees yep, this block is valid. Then and

146
00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:25.279
<v Speaker 2>only then it gets added to the official chain. It

147
00:07:25.279 --> 00:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>becomes permanent, immutable.

148
00:07:27.360 --> 00:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And that fifty one percent rule is why attacking a

149
00:07:30.279 --> 00:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>big network is so hard. You'd need massive computing.

150
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:37.439
<v Speaker 2>Power, immense power for something like bitcoin. It's practically impossible

151
00:07:37.480 --> 00:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>for any single entity to pull off a fifty one

152
00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>percent attack to rewrite history. It's the power of that

153
00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>distributed consensus and the miners.

154
00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>They get paid for this work, right. The book mentioned

155
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:49.519
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin rewards big time.

156
00:07:49.680 --> 00:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Originally it was more. Now it's like twelve point five

157
00:07:52.120 --> 00:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin per block they successfully mine, Plus they collect all

158
00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.639
<v Speaker 2>the transaction fees from the transactions included in that block.

159
00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:00.199
<v Speaker 1>That's the incentive which brings us to consensus. How the

160
00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>network agrees. We mentioned proof of workw Right.

161
00:08:03.519 --> 00:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin's method computationally hard to find the hash requires tons

162
00:08:07.399 --> 00:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>of processing power and energy, but super easy for anyone

163
00:08:10.360 --> 00:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>else to verify it once found.

164
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Makes it secure again spam and attacks because it's expensive

165
00:08:14.720 --> 00:08:15.839
<v Speaker 1>to cheat exactly.

166
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:19.079
<v Speaker 2>But the downside everyone talks about is the energy consumption.

167
00:08:19.480 --> 00:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>It's huge, which.

168
00:08:20.920 --> 00:08:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Leads to the alternatives like proof of steak POS correct.

169
00:08:24.839 --> 00:08:28.399
<v Speaker 2>POS tries to solve the energy and scaling issues of POWW.

170
00:08:28.720 --> 00:08:33.639
<v Speaker 2>Instead of miners competing with hardware, you have validators. Validators, Yeah,

171
00:08:33.679 --> 00:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>they're chosen to create new blocks based on how much

172
00:08:36.279 --> 00:08:39.919
<v Speaker 2>cryptocurrency they've staked or locked up as collateral.

173
00:08:39.519 --> 00:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So they have skin in the game exactly.

174
00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>If they try to cheat the system, they get slashed,

175
00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>they lose some or all of their staked coins. Big disincentive.

176
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Ethereum's big move to proof of steak is a major

177
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>shift in this direction.

178
00:08:52.879 --> 00:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, and there are others BFT.

179
00:08:55.879 --> 00:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Byzantine fault tolerance BFT. It's more a category of algorithms.

180
00:09:00.440 --> 00:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>The core idea is to make sure the system keeps

181
00:09:02.480 --> 00:09:06.159
<v Speaker 2>working correctly even if some nodes crash or worse, try

182
00:09:06.200 --> 00:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to send out bad information. Really important for those private

183
00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>or consortum chains where reliability is paramount.

184
00:09:12.559 --> 00:09:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Got it? Now, Bitcoin wasn't just a new currency. The

185
00:09:15.799 --> 00:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>book emphasizes how it solved a really fundamental problem for

186
00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>digital money, double spending.

187
00:09:21.600 --> 00:09:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that was the holy grail. How do you

188
00:09:24.480 --> 00:09:27.919
<v Speaker 2>stop someone from spending the same digital coin twice like

189
00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>copying an MP three file without a central bank watching

190
00:09:32.279 --> 00:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>every move?

191
00:09:33.240 --> 00:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>How did bitcoin crack it?

192
00:09:34.679 --> 00:09:37.759
<v Speaker 2>It uses the blockchain itself as the referee. When you

193
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>send bitcoin, the transaction goes into this waiting area the

194
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>memory pool. Okay, miners pick it up, put it in

195
00:09:43.840 --> 00:09:46.639
<v Speaker 2>a block. Once that block is confirmed by the network

196
00:09:46.759 --> 00:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>added to the chain, that transaction is final. The specific

197
00:09:50.679 --> 00:09:53.519
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin outputs used in your transaction are marked.

198
00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:55.759
<v Speaker 1>As spent, so if you try to spend them again.

199
00:09:55.519 --> 00:09:57.639
<v Speaker 2>The network just rejects it. Everyone can see on the

200
00:09:57.679 --> 00:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>public ledger that those coins have already been It creates

201
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>digital scarcity verifiably without needing a bank.

202
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:08.279
<v Speaker 1>It was ingenious, it really is. Okay, so blockchain secure, immutable,

203
00:10:08.360 --> 00:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>decentralized records, fantastic for money. But then comes this huge leap.

204
00:10:12.879 --> 00:10:15.799
<v Speaker 1>The idea that the book sums up so well. Cryptocurrency

205
00:10:15.840 --> 00:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is a small subset of the blockchain, like the email

206
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet.

207
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is where it gets really exciting. The underlying

208
00:10:22.919 --> 00:10:28.799
<v Speaker 2>tech decentralization, p top, consensus, anonymity. It's not just for money.

209
00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:34.399
<v Speaker 2>It's a toolkit for building entirely new kinds of applications.

210
00:10:33.559 --> 00:10:34.799
<v Speaker 1>A foundational layer for.

211
00:10:35.039 --> 00:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, lots of things exactly, which brings us right to

212
00:10:38.759 --> 00:10:40.759
<v Speaker 2>decentralized applications DAPs.

213
00:10:40.919 --> 00:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>So what are they? Fundamentally?

214
00:10:42.879 --> 00:10:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Think of them as alternatives to the apps we use

215
00:10:45.440 --> 00:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>every day, the ones running on some companies central server

216
00:10:48.639 --> 00:10:50.519
<v Speaker 2>DAPs run on peer to peer network.

217
00:10:50.559 --> 00:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Instead, we've had PDP for things like file sharing for ages, right, yeah, torrents,

218
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:55.919
<v Speaker 1>things like that.

219
00:10:56.039 --> 00:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>True, but the key difference with many modern DAPs is

220
00:10:59.039 --> 00:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>that critical data, or at least the record of actions,

221
00:11:01.799 --> 00:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>is stored on the blockchain or a similar decentralized system.

222
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:07.519
<v Speaker 1>Giving it that immutability, that fraud proof.

223
00:11:07.399 --> 00:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Quality, and often user anonymity. So the app might look

224
00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:14.799
<v Speaker 2>familiar on the surface your interface, but underneath, the business

225
00:11:14.840 --> 00:11:18.039
<v Speaker 2>logic and the data layer are built using cryptography and blockchain.

226
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a totally different architecture.

227
00:11:19.519 --> 00:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The book uses an Instagram analogy.

228
00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a good one. Imagine a decentralized Instagram. You

229
00:11:25.240 --> 00:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>upload a photo. Instead of going to.

230
00:11:27.080 --> 00:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Instagram's server, it goes somewhere else.

231
00:11:29.320 --> 00:11:33.080
<v Speaker 2>It might go into decentralized storage like IPFS, the Interplanetary

232
00:11:33.159 --> 00:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>File System IPFS gives you back a unique hash, a

233
00:11:37.279 --> 00:11:39.679
<v Speaker 2>content identifier for that photo.

234
00:11:39.840 --> 00:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, like a digital fingerprint for the photo kind of.

235
00:11:42.600 --> 00:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Then the action you uploading that photo, represented by its hash,

236
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:50.559
<v Speaker 2>gets recorded on the blockchain permanently immutably.

237
00:11:50.759 --> 00:11:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Ah, So the record of the upload is immutable, not

238
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:56.279
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the photo file itself floating around.

239
00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:00.559
<v Speaker 2>That's a really crucial distinction. The blockchain guarantees the integrity

240
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:04.159
<v Speaker 2>of the action log It provides verifiable proof you did something,

241
00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:06.879
<v Speaker 2>censorship resistant ownership of that interaction.

242
00:12:07.000 --> 00:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that makes sense. So what tech actually enables these

243
00:12:10.240 --> 00:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>more complex DAPs beyond just simple transactions.

244
00:12:14.039 --> 00:12:17.399
<v Speaker 2>The absolute game changer was Ethereum. Yes, it's the number

245
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:20.799
<v Speaker 2>two crypto, but its real significance was interesting The idea

246
00:12:20.879 --> 00:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of a programmable virtual machine on the blockchain, program meaning

247
00:12:25.279 --> 00:12:29.039
<v Speaker 2>you could run code on it, specifically smart contracts. These

248
00:12:29.080 --> 00:12:32.679
<v Speaker 2>are like little programs self executing agreements that live and

249
00:12:32.759 --> 00:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>run directly on the Ethereum blockchain.

250
00:12:35.679 --> 00:12:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Bitcoin simple.

251
00:12:36.919 --> 00:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Scripting exactly, Bitcoin's script language is limited mainly for verifying transactions.

252
00:12:43.120 --> 00:12:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Ethereum uses languages like Salinity, which are touring complete. Basically,

253
00:12:47.679 --> 00:12:50.600
<v Speaker 2>they can run almost any kind of computational logic, so.

254
00:12:50.559 --> 00:12:52.799
<v Speaker 1>You can build complex applications.

255
00:12:52.279 --> 00:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Anything, games, financial instruments, governance systems, you name it. Remember

256
00:12:57.279 --> 00:13:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Crypto Kitties, that early, crazy popular digital cat breeding game.

257
00:13:01.879 --> 00:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Vaguely yeah, clogged the network, didn't it?

258
00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:07.159
<v Speaker 2>It did, but it proved you could build non financial,

259
00:13:07.200 --> 00:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>complex applications directly on a blockchain. It opened the floodgates

260
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>for deck development.

261
00:13:12.159 --> 00:13:15.799
<v Speaker 1>That programmability is huge. You also mentioned IPFS for storage.

262
00:13:15.840 --> 00:13:16.879
<v Speaker 1>What's so different about it?

263
00:13:17.080 --> 00:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>IPFS is really ambitious. It wants to replace HTTP, the

264
00:13:21.039 --> 00:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>protocol we use to browse the web now. Its core

265
00:13:23.720 --> 00:13:26.960
<v Speaker 2>idea is revolutionary content based addressing.

266
00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what does that mean?

267
00:13:28.039 --> 00:13:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Instead of asking the network where is the file at

268
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:33.039
<v Speaker 2>this specific web address like we do now.

269
00:13:33.120 --> 00:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Like asking for a specific shelf in a.

270
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Library, right, with IKFS, you ask what is the file?

271
00:13:38.559 --> 00:13:40.679
<v Speaker 2>You ask for it based on its content, the file

272
00:13:40.720 --> 00:13:44.919
<v Speaker 2>itself generates a unique cryptographic hash its content ID or CID.

273
00:13:45.480 --> 00:13:48.039
<v Speaker 2>If the content is the same, the CID is the

274
00:13:48.039 --> 00:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>same no matter where it's stored.

275
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:52.519
<v Speaker 1>The book used that T shirt analogy, asking for a

276
00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>blue T shirt versus the T shirt on that specific rack.

277
00:13:56.120 --> 00:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly content based versus location based.

278
00:13:59.039 --> 00:14:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, conceptual elegant, But what's the practical advantage? Why is

279
00:14:03.080 --> 00:14:03.519
<v Speaker 1>that better?

280
00:14:03.639 --> 00:14:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Huge advantages. Files on ipfs are broken into smaller blocks,

281
00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:10.519
<v Speaker 2>each with its own CID, forming the structure called a

282
00:14:10.679 --> 00:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Merkle dag. It's like a graph where everything's linked by

283
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>its content hash. This means you can pull different pieces

284
00:14:16.840 --> 00:14:19.879
<v Speaker 2>of the same file from many different computers peers all

285
00:14:19.919 --> 00:14:23.840
<v Speaker 2>over the world simultaneously. It makes file retrieval way more resilient,

286
00:14:24.240 --> 00:14:27.039
<v Speaker 2>no single point of failure like a central server, so.

287
00:14:27.080 --> 00:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Better for uptime and censorship resistance.

288
00:14:29.679 --> 00:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Definitely. If one source goes down, you can still get

289
00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the file from others, and it's much harder to censor

290
00:14:35.240 --> 00:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>because the content can exist anywhere. Data integrity is also

291
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:42.919
<v Speaker 2>built in because the hash verifies the content. Driving all

292
00:14:42.919 --> 00:14:45.399
<v Speaker 2>this peer to peer magic is a library called lib

293
00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:49.679
<v Speaker 2>two P which handles finding, geres, connecting, and transferring data.

294
00:14:49.759 --> 00:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we have programmable blockchains like Ethereum and decentralized

295
00:14:53.600 --> 00:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>storage like IPFS. But blockchains themselves aren't great databases for everything,

296
00:14:58.200 --> 00:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>right cost, speed, exactly.

297
00:15:00.759 --> 00:15:03.919
<v Speaker 2>Storing large amounts of data or doing complex queries directly

298
00:15:03.919 --> 00:15:06.399
<v Speaker 2>on something like Ethereum can get slow and very expensive

299
00:15:06.480 --> 00:15:10.039
<v Speaker 2>due to gas fees. The blockchain excels at immutable records,

300
00:15:10.039 --> 00:15:13.279
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily high performance general purpose data.

301
00:15:13.080 --> 00:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Storage, which is where specialized decentralized databases come in.

302
00:15:16.279 --> 00:15:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Precisely, the ecosystem has evolved. Take orbit dB. It's designed

303
00:15:19.879 --> 00:15:22.679
<v Speaker 2>as a serverleist distributed peer to peer database that runs

304
00:15:22.679 --> 00:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>on top of IPFS.

305
00:15:23.639 --> 00:15:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Built on ipfs SING. What makes it special.

306
00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>A key thing is its use of crdt's conflict free

307
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>replicated data types. These are clever data structures. Imagine multiple

308
00:15:35.120 --> 00:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>people editing the same document offline. Crdts allow their changes

309
00:15:39.360 --> 00:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>to be merged back together automatically and correctly later without conflicts,

310
00:15:43.639 --> 00:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>even without a central server coordinating everything.

311
00:15:46.279 --> 00:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Okay, that sounds essential for any distributed system where

312
00:15:49.120 --> 00:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>people are updating things.

313
00:15:50.120 --> 00:15:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Concurrently, absolutely critical for p top databases. Orbit dB uses this,

314
00:15:54.960 --> 00:15:59.279
<v Speaker 2>along with ipfs's published subscribe system to keep data automatically

315
00:15:59.279 --> 00:16:00.399
<v Speaker 2>synced between peers.

316
00:16:00.600 --> 00:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The book mentioned a dmail example.

317
00:16:02.320 --> 00:16:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a decentralized email app. You could see orbit dB

318
00:16:05.759 --> 00:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>sinking mail across your devices using IPFS pubsub maybe using

319
00:16:09.840 --> 00:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>public private keys for secure direct messaging between contacts, all

320
00:16:13.519 --> 00:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>P to P, no central mail server holding your data.

321
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a compelling.

322
00:16:16.960 --> 00:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Vision, definitely. What else is out there decentralized databases?

323
00:16:19.879 --> 00:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's big chain dB. This one tries to blend

324
00:16:22.039 --> 00:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the best of both.

325
00:16:22.639 --> 00:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Worlds blockchain meets traditional database.

326
00:16:25.000 --> 00:16:29.759
<v Speaker 2>Kind of Yeah. It aims for blockchain features desecialization, immutability,

327
00:16:29.840 --> 00:16:33.679
<v Speaker 2>assets controlled by earners, but also traditional database features like

328
00:16:33.759 --> 00:16:38.279
<v Speaker 2>high transaction speeds, low latency, indexing, and queering data easily.

329
00:16:38.360 --> 00:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>How does it manage that?

330
00:16:39.559 --> 00:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>It uses tenderment for consensus, that's a BFT algorithm and

331
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>actually runs on top of local manger dB instances on

332
00:16:47.519 --> 00:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>each node for the fast querying part.

333
00:16:50.080 --> 00:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Clever mix. What's it good for?

334
00:16:52.200 --> 00:16:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Think enterprise use cases, audit trails where you need proof

335
00:16:55.600 --> 00:16:58.519
<v Speaker 2>but also need to search records quickly, supply chains, intellectual

336
00:16:58.559 --> 00:17:02.799
<v Speaker 2>property rights, identity manage places needing both verifiable history and

337
00:17:02.919 --> 00:17:04.079
<v Speaker 2>efficient data access.

338
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and then there's one that's quite different. Ties dB mutable.

339
00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, TIESDB is unusual because it's a mutable, decentralized database.

340
00:17:11.559 --> 00:17:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Most blockchain things focus on immutability. Here the owner of

341
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the data can actually change it.

342
00:17:16.440 --> 00:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's still decentralized.

343
00:17:17.799 --> 00:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's run by a network of nodes operated by

344
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>community members. They provide the computing power and storage, and

345
00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>they get paid in tie tokens as an incentive.

346
00:17:26.480 --> 00:17:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Interesting model, So you get verified ID. Data is publicly

347
00:17:29.880 --> 00:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>readable but owner modifiable. What are the use cases?

348
00:17:33.079 --> 00:17:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Things like distributed data stores where updates are needed, secure

349
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:39.079
<v Speaker 2>file sharing where you might need to update the file.

350
00:17:39.599 --> 00:17:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Maybe social networks where users truly own and can modify

351
00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:46.160
<v Speaker 2>their own content feeds, even big data applications where data

352
00:17:46.240 --> 00:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>naturally evolves.

353
00:17:47.480 --> 00:17:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Right. Then there's Bluesell. Is that another database.

354
00:17:50.400 --> 00:17:53.839
<v Speaker 2>It's more like a decentralized network of databases. Think of

355
00:17:53.839 --> 00:17:57.839
<v Speaker 2>it as a marketplace for database resources, specifically for DAPs.

356
00:17:58.039 --> 00:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>A marketplace. Yeah.

357
00:17:59.319 --> 00:18:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Developers, the consumers pay in Bluesell's token BLZ to store

358
00:18:04.519 --> 00:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and retrieve data. Producers are network providers who offer their

359
00:18:08.039 --> 00:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>storage and compute infrastructure, and they earn BLZ.

360
00:18:11.160 --> 00:18:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Tokens ah an incentive model.

361
00:18:13.599 --> 00:18:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Again exactly. It aims to be secure, tamper proof, scalable,

362
00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and importantly affordable, trying to avoid those sometimes high gas

363
00:18:21.279 --> 00:18:24.480
<v Speaker 2>costs you see on ethereum. For data storage, data is

364
00:18:24.519 --> 00:18:27.519
<v Speaker 2>replicated across different zones in the network. For availability.

365
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>What's under the hood.

366
00:18:28.720 --> 00:18:31.920
<v Speaker 2>It uses the Cosmos SDK to provide a no SQL

367
00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:36.039
<v Speaker 2>key value store and relies on tenderment for that byzantine

368
00:18:36.079 --> 00:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>fault tolerant consensus. It's focused on providing reliable, mutable global

369
00:18:41.000 --> 00:18:42.480
<v Speaker 2>data storage for DAPs.

370
00:18:42.640 --> 00:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we have all these decentralized options, but the

371
00:18:45.960 --> 00:18:50.559
<v Speaker 1>book also includes something that's not decentralized, Amazon QLDB.

372
00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:54.599
<v Speaker 2>Why that's a really important distinction to make. Amazon Quantum

373
00:18:54.680 --> 00:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Ledger Database ULDB is centralized. It's fully managed by Amazon.

374
00:18:59.119 --> 00:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So why talk about in this context?

375
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Because it borrows key principles from blockchain. It provides a transparent, immutable,

376
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:10.160
<v Speaker 2>cryptographically verifiable transaction log just like a blockchain. You get

377
00:19:10.200 --> 00:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>this verifiable audit trail where you can prove the history

378
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>of data changes hasn't been tampered.

379
00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:18.279
<v Speaker 1>With, but within a single trusted environment Amazon's cloud.

380
00:19:18.440 --> 00:19:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. The insight is that many businesses want that immutability

381
00:19:22.119 --> 00:19:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and verifiability for things like financial ledgers or supply chain records.

382
00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:29.039
<v Speaker 2>But they aren't ready for or don't need, full decentralization.

383
00:19:29.480 --> 00:19:32.880
<v Speaker 2>QLDB gives them those blockchain like benefits in a familiar,

384
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:34.519
<v Speaker 2>managed service.

385
00:19:34.200 --> 00:19:35.839
<v Speaker 1>And it's easier for traditional developers.

386
00:19:36.039 --> 00:19:38.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a big selling point. It uses a SEQL like

387
00:19:38.759 --> 00:19:42.039
<v Speaker 2>query language called Particle and a data format similar to

388
00:19:42.119 --> 00:19:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Jason Plus. It's built for enterprise needs. A set compliant highly.

389
00:19:46.039 --> 00:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Available, so good for tracking financial credits, debits, manufacturing records,

390
00:19:50.519 --> 00:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>insurance claims, payroll things needing an immutable log inside a company.

391
00:19:56.279 --> 00:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Precisely, it shows the influence of blockchain ideas extending even

392
00:20:00.119 --> 00:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>into centralized systems.

393
00:20:01.680 --> 00:20:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's make this more concrete. Time for some DAPs

394
00:20:04.119 --> 00:20:07.839
<v Speaker 1>actually out there in the wild. First up, Open Bizarre.

395
00:20:08.279 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the deal there?

396
00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:12.839
<v Speaker 2>Open Bizarre aims to be a truly decentralized eBay or

397
00:20:12.880 --> 00:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Amazon peer to peer marketplace, solving what problem? The middleman problem?

398
00:20:17.680 --> 00:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>No platform fees taken by a central company, no central

399
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:23.319
<v Speaker 2>authority deciding what you can or can't sell, or shutting

400
00:20:23.319 --> 00:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>down your store.

401
00:20:24.039 --> 00:20:26.319
<v Speaker 1>How does it work? Payments disputes?

402
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:28.720
<v Speaker 2>You set up your own store running the software. Payments

403
00:20:28.720 --> 00:20:31.640
<v Speaker 2>are typically in crypto like bitcoin, and for disputes, it

404
00:20:31.640 --> 00:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>has this cool system of mutually agreed on escro where

405
00:20:34.519 --> 00:20:36.680
<v Speaker 2>you can pick a neutral third person on the network

406
00:20:36.720 --> 00:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to help resolve issues if they arise. It's all about

407
00:20:39.519 --> 00:20:41.200
<v Speaker 2>direct peer to peer commerce.

408
00:20:41.559 --> 00:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, okay. Next D two the decentralized YouTube.

409
00:20:46.039 --> 00:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the idea. It's a video platform aiming to be

410
00:20:48.799 --> 00:20:52.920
<v Speaker 2>fairer to creators and viewers, ad free, censorship resistant.

411
00:20:53.200 --> 00:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>How's it built.

412
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:58.119
<v Speaker 2>It uses a blockchain like Steam originally to record things

413
00:20:58.160 --> 00:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>like votes and comments and reward users with cryptocurrency DTC tokens.

414
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:06.519
<v Speaker 2>The actual video files they're stored on ipfs.

415
00:21:06.119 --> 00:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Using that decentralized storage.

416
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so creators and viewers can potentially earn crypto for uploading, watching, voting, commenting.

417
00:21:14.359 --> 00:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Key things are no central moderation taking down videos arbitrarily,

418
00:21:18.839 --> 00:21:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and creators theoretically retain more control and ownership.

419
00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>A direct challenge to YouTube's model. Finally, Ocean Protocol. This

420
00:21:26.000 --> 00:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>one sounds really ambitious tackling data ownership.

421
00:21:28.720 --> 00:21:30.960
<v Speaker 2>It really is. It starts from that idea Data is

422
00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:33.279
<v Speaker 2>the new oil, but right now that oil is mostly

423
00:21:33.319 --> 00:21:35.799
<v Speaker 2>owned by a few tech giants. Ocean protocol wants to

424
00:21:35.880 --> 00:21:40.039
<v Speaker 2>change that. It creates a decentralized marketplace for data. But crucially,

425
00:21:40.400 --> 00:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>data providers don't have to give up their raw data.

426
00:21:43.160 --> 00:21:45.799
<v Speaker 2>They can list metadata describing their data set and set

427
00:21:45.799 --> 00:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>conditions for access.

428
00:21:47.079 --> 00:21:48.759
<v Speaker 1>So consumers can find data they need.

429
00:21:49.079 --> 00:21:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Right data consumers, maybe AI researchers or companies, can then

430
00:21:53.880 --> 00:21:57.759
<v Speaker 2>pay in crypto to access or more cleverly, compute on

431
00:21:57.839 --> 00:22:01.839
<v Speaker 2>the data without ever seeing the raw data itself, preserving privacy.

432
00:22:02.480 --> 00:22:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Ocean handles the secure exchange and ensures compliance.

433
00:22:06.119 --> 00:22:09.319
<v Speaker 1>That compute to data idea is powerful for privacy.

434
00:22:09.519 --> 00:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>What kind of uses Think training AI for self driving cars,

435
00:22:12.559 --> 00:22:16.799
<v Speaker 2>using driver data without exposing individual trips, sharing sensitive medical

436
00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:20.240
<v Speaker 2>data for research while protecting patient privacy, Building global data

437
00:22:20.240 --> 00:22:22.880
<v Speaker 2>commons where information can be used ethically and providers are

438
00:22:22.880 --> 00:22:27.400
<v Speaker 2>compensated fairly. It's about unlocking data's value while respecting ownership.

439
00:22:27.559 --> 00:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, what a journey we've taken. We went from

440
00:22:30.359 --> 00:22:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the basic ideas of blockchain Satoshi's vision with bitcoin.

441
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:36.039
<v Speaker 2>Sure, how the tech actually works, the different types, proof

442
00:22:36.039 --> 00:22:36.559
<v Speaker 2>of work.

443
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Proof of steak, then the huge leap into DAPs smart

444
00:22:39.319 --> 00:22:43.279
<v Speaker 1>contracts on ethereum decentralized storage like IPFS.

445
00:22:42.759 --> 00:22:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Explored that whole new world of specialized decentralized databases or

446
00:22:46.640 --> 00:22:50.160
<v Speaker 2>but dB, bigchain, ebe, ties dB, bluesell, and even how

447
00:22:50.160 --> 00:22:54.279
<v Speaker 2>blockchain ideas influence centralized systems like Amazon QLDB and.

448
00:22:54.319 --> 00:22:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Wrapped up with real examples like open Bizarre, dtube and

449
00:22:58.759 --> 00:23:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Ocean Protocol that are actively trying to reshape e commerce,

450
00:23:02.160 --> 00:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>content creation, and data markets.

451
00:23:04.519 --> 00:23:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can really see the art, can't you. From

452
00:23:06.680 --> 00:23:11.839
<v Speaker 2>trusting central companies to potentially trusting verifiable code and distributed networks,

453
00:23:12.079 --> 00:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>it's about individual ownership, verifiable truth.

454
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:17.079
<v Speaker 1>It really feels like a fundamental shift in how the

455
00:23:17.119 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet could work.

456
00:23:18.160 --> 00:23:21.119
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just you know, abstract tech talk. This

457
00:23:21.160 --> 00:23:24.920
<v Speaker 2>is about you potentially reclaiming agency over your data, your

458
00:23:24.920 --> 00:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>digital interactions. It's about building systems without relying on intermediaries

459
00:23:28.759 --> 00:23:31.799
<v Speaker 2>we might not trust, opening up new ways for creators

460
00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:34.519
<v Speaker 2>and data owners to be fairly compensated.

461
00:23:34.200 --> 00:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>A move towards maybe a more transparent, equitable, resilient digital world.

462
00:23:39.799 --> 00:23:41.319
<v Speaker 2>That's the hope, that's the promise.

463
00:23:41.319 --> 00:23:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, So as we wrap up this deep dis here's

464
00:23:43.640 --> 00:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>something for you, our listeners, to think about as we

465
00:23:46.480 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 1>head towards this web three world, where the idea is

466
00:23:48.759 --> 00:23:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you have more control over your digital stuff. What part

467
00:23:52.319 --> 00:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of your digital life right now something controlled by a

468
00:23:55.400 --> 00:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>central company or platform would you most want to see

469
00:23:58.519 --> 00:24:00.559
<v Speaker 1>transformed by a decentral life approach?

470
00:24:00.920 --> 00:24:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? What frustrates you most about the current setup? Where

471
00:24:04.200 --> 00:24:05.880
<v Speaker 2>could adapp make a real difference for you?

472
00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Definitely something to ponder. Thanks for joining us on the

473
00:24:09.480 --> 00:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>deep dive.
