Speaker 1: I want to welcome everyone back to the Peakingana show,
returning Ran Dustin. Hey, Ryan, how you doing.
Speaker 2: I'm good. Screw Lincoln, yep, every day say gotta keep
the tradition. Every show with you.
Speaker 1: Let's do this. We just got worried that Julian Nisan
has just been released from Belmarsh prison. Oh yeah, what
are you thinking?
Speaker 2: It's cathartic for me. I'm sure it's much better for him,
but it's such a psychological release, and I think everyone
is feeling this outside of government of Oh finally we
got a w and obviously he did a plea deal
and said he's guilty, but that doesn't mean he's guilty.
That's like somebody confessing to something under duress. It's like
you say this or you die in prison. That's like
torturing somebody. They'll greet it whatever you want. But he's
going back to Australia. I just seen him walking outside,
you know, in the air. Yeah, I felt it. I've
been wanting him free for so long and it's just
like I said it was. It was a catharsist type
of moment. I was elated. I'm still elated. I'm glad
and you know Jeremy Mackenzie beat all his charges too, so.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, I didn't know that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it cost him a quarter million dollars which they
didn't think they'd be able to raise, but they did.
And so he and his I don't know if his
wife or girlfriend or what, but I don't remember. But
both of them are free. So Matrix has lost two
in a rows. Maybe the Tates will be next, you know,
I don't know. Like I'd love to see it. I'd
like Snowden to be allowed to run freely as well,
but I don't think that's going to happen. Yeah. Well,
in my opinion, Snowden was even more damaging than wiki leagues.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Well, you know there's a certain group that when
when you hurt them, they have a habit of hurting
you back, and people have been posting h proof of
that all. Oh ever, since the set came out, had
how did Julian Assange hurt the Dings?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, he's basically responsible for Hillary losing. But
I think the big thing, and probably part of the
secretly part of the plague bargain, was shut up about
seth Rich. He basically, as in all intents and purposes,
alluded to that that was the leaker without saying that's
the leaker. He already did that and that and that
whole Marten seth Rich's murder is very very conspicuous. It's
like it just doesn't fit. He wasn't robbed, it was
it didn't make any sense. And you know, it seemed
like he got Clinton because you look at the other
stuff from wiki leagues and was all sort of well, no, duh, oh,
the US killed civilians in Iraq, Yeah, is this breaking news?
It was all stuff that I thought everyone already knew.
Some of the videos they released on wiki leaks, like
the helicopter shooting people and stuff was on live leak
and been on the internet for years already, And so
I just I don't know. I guess it's a matter
of reach, because the same thing with the Hunter Biden
that was all over Chinese websites, the whole thing, the
whole laptop. But so what, it's only when it goes
on Twitter or the New York Post gets hold of it,
then it comes down. And so the levels answership kind
of matches your level of relevance. You can say whatever
you want if no one hears you. And what WikiLeaks
could do is say this kind of stuff you and
I've been saying are our circle of people, but reach
tens of millions of people. So they had to form
him in jail, and they had trumped up rape charges
and wasn't true, and the hacking stuff wasn't true. The
main like, what's the opposite of a whistleblower?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, ne okon that got on him from Iceland admitted
he made it up, and it still didn't matter because
they those things were all just pretext. They wanted him
in jail to to jail him, but also to set
an example and to scare others away from telling the truth.
And now he's out. As Julina Sange, I thought he
was gonna die in prison if you is there any longer?
You know? And the US reached to plea bardon.
Speaker 1: Do you think he's in a head home or he's uh,
where do you think he's gonna go?
Speaker 2: The news reports I just read said he's going to Australia.
I don't know if he's Yeah, it hasn't really been
enough time to get the details. I don't know if
he is stuck in Australia. But you're at least you're
free within the country or if he's free to go
wherever he wants. But he's going back, I assume he'll
The first thing he's wanting to do is see his wife.
That's what I'd want to do. And then he's got
a is it a daughter? I think he has a child.
Speaker 1: M Well, when I had originally asked you to come on,
h I get. I don't think either of us could
have predicted I don't think anyone would have predicted that.
We would have started off talking about this.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I thought they'd wait till October. But this
wasn't a pardon, it was a plea. It was a
plea pargain. But right, yeah, I thought, yeah, he's gonna
get out, like Biden needs the votes, but I'm not sure.
I mean, they let you.
Speaker 1: How do you brag about this? How do you brag
about this? I mean, you know what.
Speaker 2: It knocked that story off the front page because New
York Posts had a story about forty nine states illegals
can vote, which was like Elon must tweeted it even
like here's another conspiracy that ended up being drue and
then a song just free and so like forget about
the illegal voting. It's weird that people can't just retain
two bits of information at the same time. But it's
just one headline or or nothing for a lot of
goldfish brains.
Speaker 1: So yeah, when I asked you to come on recently,
you've been doing a huge been revealing a lot about
the power and the money behind a pack, and yeah,
you've done. He's ad a video that was, you know,
fantastics to the point where I was like, please come
on and talk about this.
Speaker 2: So I appreciate that, because yeah, it's that. I don't
think there's anything more crucial. When people talk about ZOG
and these foreign wars, it's like, well, it all comes
down to the lobby. And I would call it the
lobby's plural to be more accurate. But that's what you
have to fix, and you need it shows like yours
to deal with these kind of topics because a lot
of other things, it's like, you got five minutes and
I can't talk. I can't explain to a pack in
five minutes. The shortest I ever did was the little
twelve minute video that's pinned on my Twitter about the
self looking ice cream cone that basically you're giving them
foreign aid. They recycle it to a donor class that
buys your politicians. But that I'm talking if you want
like names, who who, which person, which donor which, then
you need the long form content and which I did
a Twitter space on I've only done like for Twitter
spaces public ever, they're usually doing for subs. So I'm
glad you were listening, though, because this information needs to
be on as many platforms as possible, and it's a
little bit embittering to say, do all this work. You
would just say Luminardi or whatever. God damn it. They
have names, they have organizations, and one of the biggest
things is I think the two or let's say three
pro Israel groups that people know are a PACK, the
a d L and the SPLC. Definitely a PACK and ADL.
This year and last year, I've become sort of the
noticeable brands. Would you agree?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, those are two that people are actually looking
have looked into the founding of the ADEL. I mean,
who would have thought you would have heard Leo Frank's
name mentioned as much as it has in the last
eighteen months.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I know. That story is another one. It
started with benig Brith. He was the Georgia President for that,
and the ADL was formed to get him out of prison.
He did get out of prison. They broke into the
jail and got him and strung them up. But Southern Justice, well, yeah,
the ADL and he was pardoned I think in the eighties,
way after you know most morning. But that's something that
is the founder and a lot of the people that
formed the ADL were part of like Operation Magic Carpet,
and some of them are related to LBJ. I'll just
leave that on the side because that's I'm to get
into Kennedy right now. But it's all a bunch of
terrorists and criminals and nothing's changed, and they've been caught
spying on the US. They went and destroyed police files
in California. There's a man I think you know him,
Jeff Blankfort, who actually sued the ADL and he won.
That's the guy if you haven't had him already, that
you should have on the show. He can talk about that.
That's good stuff. But anyway, what I'm saying is I'm
glad people know about a pack more now than ever
since October seventh, like Brooke put a hole in the matrix.
But they are not the top Israeli lobby. As far
as money goes, it's it's the center of the spider web,
like that's where it ends up. But if you're tracking
a pack donations, for example, there's an APAC tracker, you're
missing ninety five percent of the funds because a pack.
There's the area a pack, which is the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee. People hear the word pack and think
it's a pack. I'm like, no, it's not a policy.
It's the Public Affairs Committee, not a political action. It's
nothing like that. However, there is an a pack pack.
They have a super pack called a pack Pack, and
they have several other affiliate groups that gather far more
money than the APAC pack. And that's where the donations
are coming from. And it's from the same cadre of
Zionists billionaires, some of whom were exposed on a giant
WhatsApp group. I'm sure you saw that story a few
weeks ago. That story should have been everywhere. You have billionaires,
over one hundred and fifty people, a lot of them billionaires,
colluding to bribe a may and attack people on college
campuses for protesting genocide. And yet all this mass wealth
behind this. That's a cabal. I see. Yeah, this is
the stuff like Jonestown talks about, except it's real and
they have names and it's not a secret. They APAC
does what it does very much in your face. They
brag about it. Ninety eight percent of the time. Our
incumbents win if they back a back. However, they recently
had a loss with Thomas Massey, and that's you know what.
They tried to primary him and couldn't do it. That's
a real white pill because they're just now starting to lose.
They put all their effort in and not only did
they lose, they lost pretty resoundingly. He won overwhelmingly. So
their little trick of yelling anti semi and all the
crap they do it doesn't work anymore, not in Kentucky anyway.
So if the lobby loses its ability to pick who
wins elections, then I think Israel's days are over because
they're completely dependent on the US. But what I'd like
to do is inform people of some of these other
groups they might not know about that are really the
backbone behind APAC. And if you really want to get
into it, I'll start naming.
Speaker 1: Individuals yeah, let's do that. I hope Chens is one
of them.
Speaker 2: There's like fifty, so if you if you want to
go over the big ones, we should do that. There's
on my sub stack if people want go back a
couple articles. I actually posted a I put all the
little icons together and posted a picture and like here
they are from A to Z of all these groups
are Israeli little parasites that live in the US and Canada.
But the biggest one. I don't expect people to remember
fifty different groups, but I do want them to know
the worst ones, and the worst one is UDP. It's
called United Democracy Project, just has this innocuous name that
doesn't mean any old democracy. And there's another one called
the DMFI pack, which is the Democratic Majority for Israel.
So at least they put Israel in the name a
little easier to identify. But the thing is, if you
don't know to look for that, because you don't know
the DMFI exist, then what good is that? You're not
going to be tracking it because you've never heard of it, now,
you know. But UDP again, United Democracy Project, that's the
one if you look at in the anyway. This year
last year they gave way more to a pack than
APAC pack. And they also give directly to politicians, so
it doesn't even go through a pack. It just goes
from UDP to whoever they're bribing. And so if you
don't know what that is and that it's an Israel lobby,
then you're only looking at the sort of brand names
you're aware of, and you're missing ninety percent of the picture.
And that's not an exaggeration, that's a it's ninety percent
of the money.
Speaker 1: So what I'm looking at the list here, I'm seeing like, oh,
let's see ADL obviously been a breath. Obviously is been
a breath? Is like a isn't it almost like a
I mean, I know the Masons were, I know the
Jews werep in the mazes. Isn't that like a like
a secret society kind of thing for Jews too?
Speaker 2: That it's base the name is, but my Breath is
one of their oldest organizations and it's been around. It's
not secret like the mafia or something. It's secret in
the sense that the press, which they own, just doesn't
report it.
Speaker 1: Now, what about the American Jewish Committee, They've been around forever.
I mean, you can find If I'll go open up
my copy of The Authoritarian Personality from nineteen forty nine,
nineteen forty nine, nineteen fifty, I will see that the
American Jewish Committee was they commissioned that book. They commissioned
the study.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I mean the AJAC is in there, Jensa.
Like you mentioned, there's there's Hellal, which is all over
the college campuses. One that people ought to be more
aware of is the HIAS. It's the Jewish organization for refugees.
And these organizations originally you have to think of the
formation of Israel. They're trying to get legit war refugees
from World War II to Palestine, and so they didn't
have any rules against human trafficking, because sometimes human trafficking
is not for sex, slavery and all the nefarious stuff.
Sometimes you're trying to illegally immigrate somebody somewhere for safety.
But it allowed these groups to get massive organization and wealth,
and then they didn't stop when the war was over.
And it's really odd because you know, Israel has very
strict immigration and to be a settler you have to
be Jewish. Is based on DNA but UH and and
conversion and so on but outside they're willing to help
move refugees into other people's countries. And that's from that group.
You've got the JCPA, You've got camera Canary Mission. Canary
Mission is kind of like the ad L, only more
low class. That's their attack dog to smear people. There's
a j w I. But the weird things are the
ones that like they're Oh, obviously there's a UJA, which
has changed names a bunch of times, but they still
have the UJA of and pick a state like UJA
Federation of New York or new JA Federation of you know,
Jersey or whatever. But uh, you have the like United
Jewish Appeal with the Bronffins for example, which is now
called like the Federated Jewish Council or whatever you know.
But yeah, you get these groups, and then they have
umbrella groups too that will meet with all the presidents
of all the different groups. And so it's very well organized,
and I don't expect people to know all of these
different things. There's an American Jewish Congress, which is weird.
How can you have an American Jewish We have a congress,
American Jewish Congress, what set for I mean, you might
as well. Just call the Congress the American Jewish Congress
at this point because they run it. But there's one
with that name. It's a Jewish United Fund. There's uh
this top of my head. But and then you have
all the ones that even put Zionist in the name,
the Zionis Organization of America. Now this is confusing for
some people because APAC used to be called the American
Zionist Council and it was called the ZA. The Zionist
Organization of America chain its name to APEAK and then
created another group called ZA of the same name. Very
similar thing happened with the JA, the Jewish Agency. Prior
to the formation of Israel. The Jewish Agency was people
like Bengurian and his whole cabinet, Like the very first
government of Israel was just the people from the Jewish
Agency that now are state and Haganah became the IDF
and Palmack and just became the different organizations in the
Israeli government. And then they created another JA. So when
you're talking about the Jewish Agency, do you mean since
Israel or before? Because Jewish Agency before Israel was just
sort of their government in waiting a bunch of organized
crime really. And then they have another Jewish agency which
has a board of governors of wealthy tycoons who benefit
from both state assistance and nepotism. And those are the
people that sponsored nine to eleven for example. I'll put
that aside too, because you get me going for hours
on that one. But these organizations that the JA was
admitted to in the FBI documents by Paul Kursbery, they
were sent to document the event. No no da da They
operate almost invisibly though everyone it is you'll knows who
these groups are. But Americans maybe no a pack and
that's all they've ever heard of. But at least they
know one, and they know the biggest one. And as
far as organization goes, but as far as money, it's
the UDP for sure. But what APAC does is there.
I've heard people like Merzheimer say, well, it's not illegal
because it's an American lobby, it's a Jewish lobby. Not
it is lobby. So technically what they're doing they don't
have to register under FARAH because they're not foreigners. And
Thomas Massey argued FARA is for foreign agents. Well, you
don't have to be a foreigner to be an agent
of a foreign country, you can be whoever. If you're
acting as an agent for a foreign state, you're a
foreign agent. But I would argue that doesn't matter because
the argument about a pack is not whether or not
it's composed of foreigners or if it's composed of citizens
that act up on behalf of a foreign state, which
Massy's right about that. The legality of a pack is
the way they bundle, they credit bundle to get around
campaign finance laws. That's illegal, no question about it, and
they do it, and they've been caught doing it, and
so not attacking them on that and splitting hairs about
the legality about Fara is I don't know why what
what are you doing? Like you got to lay up
right here, you gotta slam dunk. You don't need to
take the three point shot. You know, there's there's a
much easier crime to prosecute them on. And Al Jazeera
did two dacos about it, one in the UK, one
in the US showing the bundling process that they do.
They just they'll give out prepaid credit cards to a
bunch of people and say you're all going to donate
two thousand or whatever the limit is to so and so,
and they will and that way. Okay, one guy can't
just donate millions of dollars, but yes he can. He
just divided amongst a bunch of willing people that obey
and donate where you tell them to. They've been doing
that openly. They spy on the US and then of
course they they use the ADL Canary Mission and the
camera as their attack dog to smear people politically and
go after students, journalists, anybody else, anybody from Roger Waters
to Max Bloom with all to myself, they'll do giant
hit piece, call you anti Semitic, or call you self
hating jew if you're Jewish, Holocaust and I are. Whatever
they gotta say to marginalize you, kick you off payment processors,
kick you off social media. And then we also know
from Twitter files that they were actively getting people removed
who they didn't, who were engaged in wrong think at all,
into the guise of fighting anti Semitism, which is not
what they're doing at all.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, you also have here the UDP's Wall Street
based donorous to apex, super packed by industry and finance,
insurance and real estate seem to be leading the leading
the way here, Huh.
Speaker 2: It's a lot of hedge funds manager and number two
is probably real estate.
Speaker 1: And then says retired retired.
Speaker 2: Well, then that's just the spouses of the hedge's and
real estate people, because what will happen is so is
so donate Like David Zalik donated almost i think five
hundred thousand to a pack and like two million to UDP,
and then his wife matched him with the a pack.
But she's not a hedgy. She's a just the wife
of a hedgy. And you could count that as retired
because she never worked. But yeah, retired people. Some of
that is just spous as though, and then yeah, real
estate and definitely hedge fund managers and then probably lawyers.
Like fifty percent of it though is hedg He's in
real estate over half about half, and and those numbers
like I'm I'm thinking, yeah, but if you dig, some
of what they'll claim is from one thing isn't Uh.
It always goes back to the hedgies, which is just
making money, manipulating money, and that whole thing is rigged
right right, Yeah, look at the game stop fiasco. It
just removed the buy button from Robin Hood and there
I had Peruvian Bull on the show and he explained
it in a more all streety way. But essentially, yeah,
that that fiasco just showed how rigid is they gamble.
If they win, they win, If they lose, they still win.
And then obviously the biggest thing was the two thousand
and eight baleous all those people gambling on securities and
they just said, oh, they're too big to fail, and
that was that. That was trillions the banks.
Speaker 1: But what are what are the what are the names
of some of these people?
Speaker 2: Well, the last year the biggest donor was a guy
named Yan kum you know what else, So you can
find a lot of these hedges are Ukrainian oligarchs that
I mean Jewish Ukraine. We'll call them Russian oligarchs. But okay,
all right, they might have started in Russia and got
exiled and they just went next door. And this will
have to do with the war in Ukraine and Russia too.
But Yan Komb is the founder of WhatsApp, the app
where that group was billionaires was ganging up on imagine that, yeah,
I know, And he gave five million dollars to UDP
and that's annually usually just one one billionaire's five million dollars.
The guys he's and.
Speaker 1: Just so and just anybody would have any questions about this.
You're only limited in how much you can donate to
like campaigns and things and things like that. I mean,
these are quote unquote organizations. A lot of them I
would assume are five to one c threes. So you
can donate however much you want to these. There's no cap, right.
Speaker 2: That's right. So like he he can't give five million
dollars to Trump or Biden, but he can give it
to UDP, who can split it amongst a bunch of
people and then they all donate or they can pay
for other things. I don't know why we have campaign
finance laws. They're never enforced.
Speaker 1: So yeah, so this guy with WhatsApp, I'm really interested
in that group. I know that that came out and
of course the media, Yeah, the legacy media just didn't
pay attention to it. The regime media wasn't going to
pay attention to it. Who else was in there conspiring
to take down these protesters?
Speaker 2: Oh, you want to know about the WhatsApp group or
the donors because they kind of overlap.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, as far.
Speaker 2: As I know, I don't know if Yan was in
the WhatsApp group. Like ten billionaires were named, and it
just said there's one hundred hundred and fifty more participants
and we know two of their names. I mean, he
was probably one of them. I mean, he is the
top donor this year and he created WhatsApp. They had
to have a mole to get that story, by the way,
But a little bit on Yon Kum, I let people
know just his personality. His ex girlfriend has a restraining
order on him for physical and verbal abuse, which had
to be pretty bad because for that to stick on
a billionaire who's part of the system, it's got to
be real. And uh of course, uh just side note.
JP Morgan was using WhatsApp to organize hush payments for
Epstein victims. What a group.
Speaker 1: That's interesting because when you look at the when you
look at the board of of JP, of JP Morgan, Chase,
specifically Chase, there's only like three in their lawyers, their
stand ins, they're not even really on the board right,
which which is which was interesting. These has pointed out
to me that you see more people from like former
the former military or former like Mike the Military Industrial
Complex on that board. Then you actually see any Jay's.
Speaker 2: On the board. The boards a pushover and it's it's
well known that Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan were paying
Epstein victims. They got sued and they shuttled tens of
millions of dollars they had to pay out. And then
there's people like Leon Black from a Global Apollo and
Robert Kraft, who was part of this group, by the way,
who was caught getting uh happy, ending massages in Florida
and essentially raping women. He gets away with it. He's
so wealthy, and what are these Chinese immigrants going to
do about it? But they get caught over and over.
And Leon Black gave hundreds of millions of dollars to
Jeffrey Epstein that we know of, and he put him
on one of his boards. And what they do is
they would move money around in circles through different LLCs
they created. They're just total not real companies. Wexer would
do the same thing. He would use universities as a medium. Oh,
this is for the Abigail Less Wexter Abigail Foundation, and
they would donate and then that person would donate the
money would just go around in a triangle. But it
is interesting the way that story that everyone was interested
in about Epstein just disappeared. And they're like, oh, when
they can release the client list? Oh he died in jail.
Oh well we'll never know. And you know, I'm over
here tearing my hair out. I'm like, here's the list.
And Jean Long Burnell was also arrested and died in prison.
Glynn Maxwell was arrested, Niguard got arrested, one of the
Broncins got arrested, a lot of people had resign from
their positions. All these banks got sued and lost. It
did not end in that we do know the names
and people did get caught, and we do know who
made the hush money. It's just not on TV. And
so they the meme is like, no one got punished,
and when's where's the client list. I'm like, man, I
even put it on a T shirt. Here the people,
and it's not like some list written in a notebook
in a locker somewhere. Nobody would do that. And there's
a bunch of fake lists where they'll just go grab
all the celebrity names out of a black book and
go look at this.
Speaker 1: What.
Speaker 2: No, it's from the victims testimonies of who is there
and who they're forced to sleep with, Glynn Duban, just
Staley on down right, It's like, oh, over a hundred names,
and where do you go with that? You know, I
made a map, I put it on a shirt. I've
been following the case until our alt media grows. I
don't think these stories it's worth chronicling, I guess. But
you need someone like Tucker or some big name to
cover it and say the same things I've been saying.
Then everyone would know about it. Otherwise you know it's
but this is the kind of the white pill. Very often,
even from myself, things I've researched and put out that
we're just sort of around a small following for ten
twelve years, and then suddenly everyone notices it, and then
it's starting to get makeway. Like Apek, like you've mentioned
with Leo Frank, that was a story that nerds knew about,
and now because of Elon Musk, it's all over Twitter
or X excuse me, it's all over the place. In
the next phase will be when it hits the couch
potato level. That's when you break the Lemming effect. That's
when everyone's gonna know. And a little bit that Juliana
Soans started like that. He had a hardcore supporters, and
it just got to the point where everybody supported Assannge
who didn't work for government. That was the most delineated,
like split down the middle issue I can think of,
where the entire public supports Julian Assange and the entire
government like want some debt or jailed for life. But
there's so much public pressure that he finally got out.
So it is worth you. You never know what's gonna
hit in the future. So any of you doing research
and putting out articles and not enough people read it,
and you feel like, why did I even do this?
You don't know. I mean, look at Norman Finkelstein. He
wrote all those books and put all the like decades
of energy into the Palestine conflict. And I've met him
in DC. He would come to Grant Smith's events and things,
and around twenty twenty or so he just gave up.
He's like, I'm it's not gonna matter. They're doomed. And
then you had the combination of free speech on X
in October seventh, and now he's on, he gets to
debate on TV shows and well known name and now
people are like discovering his work for the first time.
He's an og Another case, people like studs like Ray
McGovern or Scott Ritter, Like Scott Ritter has been Scott
Rudder for all you know, he's been out spoken since
the nineties at least. But it's like he got rediscovered
with the Ukraine conflict and he's all over the place.
But he's been doing that and a lot of it
is Judge Napolitano. He's some reason allowed on YouTube and
he'll have these people on. Larry Johnson's become a well
known name who two years ago very few people outside
of nerd circles knew who he was, and so a
lot of people are finally getting a little bit of
recognition they deserve. You get Escobars on the show, McGovern's
on their Lawrence Wilkerson, Scott Horton, that these people that
deserve more attention to their work are getting it, but
it's still not enough. It's like, Okay, you have the
Judges show, you have, you're allowed to be on Twitter,
but even that's still semi censored, and some people still
can't talk at all.
Speaker 1: I think one of the things that's important, especially one
of the things that Judge Napolitano has been able to
do when even Douglas McGregor at this point is you know,
they're they're just outright half the time they're not even
using the term Zionist or using the term Jew and.
Speaker 2: Well sometimes it is Jewish. I mean, bens Zionism is
just Jewish supremacy. That's that's what it means. It's a
But you don't I say Zionists, because you don't have
to be Jewish to be a Jewish supremacist. There's some
Christian Zionists, Atheist, scientist, whatever, so it's more accurate. But
like to deny like the fact that Zionism is rooted,
and you can't have Jewish supremacy without Judaism. I mean,
you won't even have a concept of what a Jew
is without religion, so you can't totally divorce it from that.
But you can't really blame it all on that either.
There's a people interpret religion in different ways, so like
you can't go i mean Christian World Christian Zionists just
because Christian Zionists exists. The majority of Jews there, that's
the problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but but we're we're also at the point that
if if they're going to clearly come out and say
that anyone that if you're anti Zionist, you're also an
anti semi then I mean just talking just calling it
Jewish supremacy is you know, because you know it's the
old it's the old Chappelle joke. You know, two words
you can't say together, the Jews. I mean, it seems
like between October seventh and just yeah, I guess, I mean, yeah,
calling calling X a free speech platform is.
Speaker 2: People are sensitive to saying jew because of the Holocaust.
Because with other groups, people will say the Kords, the Russians, whatever,
Well not all Kords, but you don't. That's just understood.
I'm not t about everyone. You're just saying this group,
you know, but people very sensitive about it. However, you're
if you're going to be super accurate, I think you can.
You could say zionis Jews, Zionus, Christians, uh, Zionus, Israelis whatever.
Because there are there are subgroups within a greater category,
and it depends on how specific you want to be.
But it's all rooted in a religion that's essentially self alienating.
That divides the whole world into jew and Gentile, which
is probably not psychologically healthy to do, but you know,
three different faiths. I'll accept that paradigm. The rest of
the world doesn't. I mean, the rest of the world
is far larger. But that's what they think. And the
root of the justification for stealing land that people live
on comes, in my opinion, a mythology where they think
King David and King Solomon are real characters. They're not.
And the Jews are in that land. First historically they
were not. Even if they were, you don't racially inherent land,
but just this mucky mess of Like, I don't want
to argue about religion. Can you get a lot of
people like they think the Torah is real? A lot
of Christians do too, so you can't convince them otherwise.
So I just skip all that and be like, how
about this? Quit killing kids? You know, Like, how about that?
That's a very easy argument to win. You cannot just
roll up and bomb someone's apartment with people in it,
which is what Israel does.
Speaker 1: Well, Yeah, and I think that's the more than previous
attacks twenty fourteen, go back to cast Sled I mean
this is just basically yeah, this is this is being streamed.
I mean basically this, you know, a massacre of civilians
is being streamed, and it's being streamed alive to you know,
the biggest platform. I mean, I don't know if that's
is the biggest platform, but it definitely is the platform
where for politics political people go. Yeah, politics where political
people go, where where political narratives go to be born
and to die and to fester. It's being streamed there
and people are seeing it, and you.
Speaker 2: Know, they think it's Joshua, you know, like they're nat
and Yahoo's quoting Samuel and Amelek and like they think, yes,
slaughter every man, woman, child and livestock, the kind of
crazy crap that's in the Old Testament. They No, you
cannot kill every child, woman and man and animal. They're
not alec and that's a war crime. And this isn't
the Bronze Age. You can't behave like that. But they
quote it as if that totally justifies what they can do.
That we just call them all, Yeah, they attacked us
on October seventh as an occupied people attack their occupier
and you're gonna blame them. That's like blaming a slave
revolt on the slaves instead of on slavery. Yeah, if
you had that enslaved them and treated the way they did,
they wouldn't be revolting. You know. They just remove all
accountability and responsibility from the equation and act like they
got attacked for no reason.
Speaker 1: I've read on the on the show since October seventh.
I've actually read it twice. There is an essay by
loringe Ganno called Israel the psychopathic Nation, and all he
does in that the essay is to quote Jewish thought leaders,
Jewish philosophers, Zionists, Zionist leaders, and it's I mean, once
you know, we.
Speaker 2: Did something similar with Robert and Mukesh I said go
find all the crazy stuff like gold in my ear
saying we can never forgive the Arabs for forcing us
to kill their children. I mean, every accusation is a confession.
And you can go through the Kanesset members, prime ministers.
They say the damnedest things, and like Herzog this year
and last year calling them animals, and they just you're
going on. Some of the stuff in the Talmuds, the
most racist stuff you've ever seen, like way worse than mine.
Com and that's a religious cult. But they you know,
and this is all about interpretation, of course, but the
way they see it is they are superior and God
gave them the land and they can just kill anybody. Well,
you're not used to be there. God gave it to
my blood group. That's what you're dealing with. And I
don't think rational people can understand that. What when you
you want to kill a cow on this altar? And
it's crazy stuff.
Speaker 1: Well, from all of my research, from the research I
have done, is I mean, they don't even believe it.
They don't doesn't believe in God. The most of them
don't don't believe that God gave him the land. They
just see the Torah as it names a certain group.
We're calling ourselves that certain group, and then we're just
going to it lays out this playbook and it says this,
and we're just going to use it.
Speaker 2: I think quote he said a lot of Zionists don't
believe in God, but they believe he gave him the land.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean, and and.
Speaker 2: They're not they're not really Jewish, they're not really atheist.
Because if you're going to be Jewish, did you need
to believe in the miracles and Moses all that stuff. Right,
if you don't believe in the supernatural, then you're not
really religious. But if you believe in the false history
of David killing Goliath and Samson and all these fictional characters,
then you're not really atheist either. That'd be like someone
believing in King Arthur that he was actually a king
in England and an historical figure and stuff. Lancelot, Merlin.
All those are not real people. Jacob and Esaul are
not real people if you're an atheist. So it's a
weird combination of all. Right, you got rid of some
of the really ridiculous stuff like someone living in a
Wales belly for three days and Tower of Babbel and
the flood story and all that, but you still think
it's based on history and it's not. So you're not
an atheist either. You just worship yourself and you pick
and choose things that this is how belief works, like
that whatever you know further is your position is true,
and whatever doesn't you ignore. So they're a unique thing,
and so I'm just like, it doesn't do any good
to say where they look. Man, they're psychotic, is what
it is these people worship themselves and they think we're
a group of particular bloodline, which now is like DNA,
which is also not true. A lot of them are
just from Europe and they think they've been living in
the Middle East one thousands of years and that they're
returning there now. Historically the people that have had genetic
continuity in that land are the Palestinians. They just converted
to Christianity or Islam, both of which are actually older
than Judaism because they're still riding the Talmud in Iraq,
while the other two religions that already crystallize, which we
make Christianity the oldest ameryatic faith.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that is one of the that is one of
the funniest things is that they will say that they
have they're the father religion, when when literally Christianity is
the way it's practice and Islam in the way is
practice is older than modern Judaism or what what What's
what Shahak Israel Shahack talks about and his both Jewish
history Jewish religion says really didn't come into exist until
about the year eight hundred. So what they're you know,
so what they're doing is depends.
Speaker 2: On the branch of Christianity too, like not to hope.
It's witnesses and stuff. Some of them are new yeah, yeah, yeah,
but if.
Speaker 1: You go back to yeah, if you go back to
Catholic and Catholic this schism and everything. But you know,
you're yeah, I mean they're they're you know, when you really.
Speaker 2: Christ is your savor in the resurrection. That story has
been crystallized for a long time. Would you make it
the oldest Abrhanic faith. It does have Jewish patriarchs in
the story, but the thing is those the religion. But
like there was no exodus, yeah, hebrews. Raham was a Hebrew,
not a Jew. And they have all these children. There
is Judah, which is where Jews are from his tribe.
And then but you have Joshua and Daniel and all
these other people who are also from Abraham. Abrahamic Israelites
is what they call themselves. And so only one of
those twelve are Jews of the Israelites. And anyway, like
to me, it's not worth arguing. My thing is the
political situation of modern times uses a bunch of mumbo
jumbo where they rationalize it with religion or pseudoscience or
whatever they want to do social darwaism. It doesn't matter.
They're killing children, it shouldn't happen, and yet they get support.
The only reason it matters to mention religion at all
is the fact that churches are organizations and they do
give billions of dollars to Israel so on. Aside from
these lobbies you get money. You get it from universities too.
Like that's why the divest movement so important. Is if
you look at people assume when you donate universities, that's
going to textbooks and teachers' salaries and very little they
just use it in an investment vehicle to as a business.
Universities are businesses. It's not at all about education, and
a lot of it is invested in the companies we
want to divest from involved in the settlement process and
the apartheid in Israel. And churches do the same thing.
A lot of people think, oh, when I donate to
a church, is going to feed the poor, And some
of it does, but depending on your church, a lot
of it just ends up in somebody's mutual fund.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're they send out these things about oh, these
Jewish widows who are who are starving and are poor
in Israel, and it's like one of the biggest socialist
countries in the world. They like, get free housing if
they want at those socialists. I mean, it's it's it's ridiculous.
And Christians, by I remember Jeremy R. Hammond, you know,
he said in his book Obstacles to Piece, he said,
you know the way so many Christians, you know, Protestant Christians,
low Church Christians feel about apac let me feel about Israel.
I mean, you don't even need an a pack. They'd
figure out a way to fund it. They'd figure out
a way to to lobby their politicians in order to
Now I'd like to see that. I think we'd have
a better chance if it was just.
Speaker 2: That there is a voting block, especially in the South.
Sad to say, of evangelicals that just vote for Israel.
But the thing is a lot of these televangelists that
sustain that type of scho filled Christianity, which in my
mind is not really Christian, would not be able to
exist were they not propped up and given airtime and
stuff by Jewish scientists. You would never have heard of
the Hagey and Pat Robertson and stuff. Had he not
gotten support from Zionus, he'd never make it to TV.
Speaker 1: I mean, who was given Cherry Fallwell? Who gave Cherry
Fallwell a plane?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah, yeah, there you got Jerry's kids. I made.
I was in lynch Burn. I played baseball back in
the day. I actually hit a triple on on Liberty Field.
But I said something about Fallwell as a joke, and man,
I called him Jerry's kids, like the orphanage. You know, man,
dude that if Lukes could kill, he had a real
grip on that whole city. And he's the one that
blamed nine to eleven on the gays, Like I'm not
sure how that works. That audio.
Speaker 1: There's also that audio of him trying to warn Nixon
about yeah, our greatest ally.
Speaker 2: Well Nixon knew, Oh of course, yeah, went to be
heming group. Well that's another can of worms. He called
it a gay damn thing he'd ever seen. Nixon knew.
And he's the only guy to get impeached and convicted.
They impeached Trump, but they never convicted. They impeached and
convicted Nixon, and he gets they act like Nixon is
the worst thing ever Watergate. They set him up. They
wanted Ford in from the Warren Commission. No less, they
set him up. Now, Nixon was a syndicate president. He
was tied up with the mob. He made a bunch
of mistakes, but you know, he did with many good
things and he was he was not an ally of them,
and they got rid of him. At least they didn't
shoot him like they did. JFK. That would have been
too much to do in a row, you know, like
it had been a little much. They said them up.
Speaker 1: So was Gerald. Ford's real name was Leslie Lynch King.
Is that king mean anything interesting?
Speaker 2: I don't know. He was a liar though.
Speaker 1: His maternal his maternal grandmother's name was Levi Addison. Her
grandfather's name was Levi Addison Gardner.
Speaker 2: Oh sounds very Irish, Yeah, very much so, very much so,
or what I say, left handed eskimos. Yeah, you know.
And it's like why even point that out. It's like,
let's not pretend to be stupid. Man. People have ethnic
loyalties because a lot of people are identitarians, and you
can't ignore that and act like, oh, no, we're all colorblind.
No they're not. They're people that are just loyal to
their tribe or their team, because that's how a lot
of people operate group things. So why not point it out.
You know, if all these people in Apac were Chinese,
that we were going to war with all the China's enemies,
you think, well, maybe you know the state's involved. Duh. Well,
all these people being Jewish and they're all gun ho Israel,
and we're going to act like we're not allowed us
to notice that. Yeah you can. They're racist. I mean,
it's no different than delineating between white supremacists, Nazis and Germans. Okay,
not all Germans or Nazis, not all Jews or Zionists. Fine,
but don't act like it's got nothing to do with it.
They it grew out of that faith, and why you
can't have a holy land without holy something. They wouldn't
be in Israel if it wasn't tied to that religion somewhat.
So you can't ignore it. And these people are really
loyal to it, and to the point where even if
they don't believe in Judaism at all, they still have
a Jewish identity ethnically, and so they're loyal to this
state because that's them whatever, Like you could be an
Irish American and love Ireland and not be a Catholic
right then easily, and so you could do the same
with Israel and not even be a practicing Jewish religion.
Speaker 1: Oh the what's your what's your opinion? What's your take
on the the immigration thing? I mean you mentioned hyas earlier.
Someone just sent me a video of from Shalom TV,
Jewish Council for Public Affairs, and they're saying you have that.
I'm saying in this video that mass immigration into America
is number one on their agenda.
Speaker 2: It's a blocker vote. You know, there's overlapping interest there.
So Democrats want mass immigration because through welfare, you're essentially
bribing votes. Although illegals shouldn't vote, they can and are,
so it's a way for a political entity to stay
in power. Some conservative businessmen like the exploited labor and
paying people under the table, so they'll say, oh, no,
don't but they really don't care. They really want to
keep it going. For the Zionists, though they have a
it's not a really practical kind of thing. It's more
of an ideological thing. They are ardent racists and their
idea is to do the clergy plan, dilute the bloodlines
of their competitors by mixing brown and white together. This
is not how I think I'm gonna say what they
say to get rid of the white race because it's
a threat to Jews and they want to rule over
just again, this is not my words. A bunch of
Mongols and low iq sheep that can never threaten their
positions of power.
Speaker 1: Yeah, discussing, and I think another thing is is history.
Speaker 2: By the way, It's funny because almost all brown, black,
and yellow nations don't listen to Israel. It's only the
white nations that get on their knees. So their plan
is going to end up having the opposite effect. The
more Muslims and Mexicans stuff you import, the less control
Israel's going to have over the United States.
Speaker 1: Well, I think another thing is historically, and again I'm
reading this book on my show Israel shahacks Jewish Jewish history,
Jewish religion, and he talks about how when they're when
a country is not nationalistic, when they're not homogeneous, it's
much easier for Jews to take control and to have
you know, and it's blend in more too. If it's
a multi ethnic, a multicultural society, then they blend in
and they're just like every other. You know, they're just fit.
You're fellow white person.
Speaker 2: Uh, they blend in with whites already. I think it's harder,
but it's I think it's to Frankfurt school. The more
little ethnic and religious divisions you can get the boy
fighting each other, the better. And so they want to
import stuff in. They'll promote ideas of feminism and homosexuality
whatever to get gaze and straits and men and women
and black and white and this and that to waste
their time. I'm fighting over identity politics and destroying each other. Meanwhile,
the hedge funnies are walking away with all the money
because look at like the Saint Floyd, George Floyd's story
or any of these stupid things. It's manufactured outrage about
whatever the media decides to beat into the ground. Meanwhile,
the story that should have been headlines everywhere was FDx
laundering money out of Ukraine back to the DNC thirty
two billion dollars. That should have been a really major story,
and it wasn't. They want to talk about Floyd or
Black Lives Matter or wage gap that doesn't even exist.
It's just the promote nonsense and the kind of like
social issues that are very easy to grasp, even the
lowest rung in the ladder. It can be like, don't
be racious, don't rejects. Really simple concepts are spoon fed
to say, look, this thing happened. A cop did this
bad thing to a black guy or whatever. Oh so
much outrage, but it's really insignificant compared to the other
crimes that are going on carried out by your state.
I mean that cop was punished into story, although I
don't even get to that, but I mean, I think
Floyd probably died of a drug overdose. But if he hadn't,
even if he was whatever, it's still insignificant. It shouldn't
have been a national story, and it was. That's what
they do they and the trick didn't work this year
because normally they get all the college kids protesting problems
that have been resolved for a hundred years. It's kind
of one of my lines, like any college kid can
tell you every detail of seventeenth century slavery, but not
the fact that slaves exist in Libya because of our
invasion or the modern things that are going on, the
children being starved to death in the Congo and Sedan
and Yemen and Palestine. But then, rather than being diverted
by manufactured news, so they waste all their time barking
up the wrong tree because of X Telegram and TikTok,
they discovered Palestine and they all started protesting the genocide
of Palestine. And then did you see the cops get
on their knees like they did for Black Lives Matter
and white people washing people's feet, and no you saw
coming in cracking heads, arresting people like aha. See, when
you actually threaten the system, the system gets physically violent.
As long as you're chasing ghosts, as long as you're
on some jonestown paths and nowhere chasing around the Illuminati
Bavarian nWo global as deep state elitist d da da
da da da don't care because it isn't real. If
you want the real people, it's the names, which we
were kind of getting into with UDP. The it's a pack,
it's DMFI, it's United Democracy Project, it's JENSA, it's Canary,
it's ADL and it's not a secret. And that's what
you could clean up if if they lost a pack,
if a pack was registered as a foreign agent, or
even better, just as a culture whoever APAC supports, we
vote for the other person. We wouldn't have these wars
in the Middle East. It wouldn't be a genocide. It
wouldn't even be in Israel, I don't think. And honestly,
net Yahoo's in the US today or is it the
twenty fourth over there yet?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's twenty fourth.
Speaker 2: Twenty fifth here, so he's yeah, he's already talked to Congress.
Then you've got the presidential debate on the twenty seventh.
He wants war with hesball I said on February twenty eighth,
I got some intel out of Israel from their own military.
We're going in the end of June. That's what they said.
Things gonna happen between February to now. But the idea,
and you can also look at the troop rotations of
reservists and whatnot who openly post this crap on Instagram
and know what Israel's planning. They want to go to
war in the North, but they want the Americans to help.
They don't want to do it by themselves. So the
Eisenhower as a carrier is sitting off of Lebanon and
it appears they're about to drag us into another one.
This has to end. And I think more realistic than
getting rid of APAK or registering no UNDERFARA, which is
fine goal to aim for, it is probably more feasible
to just go against whoever you and APAX support, Like
what Thomas Massey just say, Oh, APAC likes this person
hates the other one. We're all going to vote for
the other one. It needs to be a single issue thing,
like if if you are a lackey for Israel, you
don't get into office. And the way to do that
is by gaining more media, Like I could make a
list near November and like here's the APEC people and
here's their opponents. Vote for column, you know, be all
the opponents. The problem though, is a lot of times
it's APAC versus APAC, So you got to start paying
attention to the primaries. But on the lower levels there
are people who are not Israeli shills, so we can
keep building a larger and larger It's a minority now,
but there's there's at least twenty two or so Republicans
in Congress, that are not part of it. It's not enough.
But let's let's double that, triple that, and in a
couple election cycles, maybe we can get this cancer out
of the system.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, yeah, something when you look at like
Europe and how Europe is voting against immigration, and until
they vote against Zionist occupation, no real change is going
to be made. We're just we're going to be starting.
It's the same here until we're voting and we have
people who are actually running on getting rid of the
Zionist occupation. And I know people say, well, they'll never
get elected. Somebody has to start the message. Somebody has
to start, has to start it. If you start it now,
it will get normalized. Who would have thought people would
be discussing the JQ on X two years ago.
Speaker 2: No one. Well that's something as I know, you know,
because I put it. We did a speech together in
Texas and like the core of my speech was to
get rid of zog. You have to get rid of
zomb If you don't get rid of the Zius occupation media,
you can't get rid of the Zionis occupation. Government. Fixing
the media fixes everything else. And that X allowed even
a slither of free speech, destroyed the Zionis narrative because
what Israel does is totally indefensible. They straight up murder babies.
It's not an exaggeration. The they buldozed. They every manner,
every war crime you could think of, they've done it,
and they've invented some new ones. They've done some stuff
like the worm people, where they amputate people's legs and
have them crawl around in diapers and give them feeding tubes.
Like total torture, stuff not even thought of in the past,
like why would you do that to prisoners? Israel does
these kind of things. They rape children tied to beds.
I mean that you look at the hostages that were
freed from Hamas and freed from Israel. If they're they're
total basket cases. The ones that come out of Israeli prisoners,
they're beating, their tortured. It's disgusting. The only way they've
been able to get away with what they get away
with is they ran the media, and you only need
like one platform to break a monopoly. They have a cartel.
CNN's not gonna say it, you know, BBC's not gonna
touch it. But if you can get it out on
x which is a big one, and then you can
add to that with Telegram, maybe TikTok, Substack, Rumble, and
a lot of these podcasting n app stop I'm not
allowed to use, but like pod beam and stuff like that. iTunes,
it starts to widen that gap. And once their monopoly
is broken, very quickly people will turn on them. And
you've seen it. Look at the European states, which are
the last ones are recognizing Palestinian statehood. On the twenty
eighth of May, you had Norway, Ireland and Spain. A
couple weeks later it's Slovenia, and then on the twenty
first of this month you had in Armenia all recognizing Palestine,
which most of Latin America, Africa, the Milie already did.
So you're starting to see this and it's because there's
public pressure. And that's because there's actual reporting where there
never was before. You know that. I mean, look at
twenty fourteen. You brought up earlier a little bit got
on Twitter, but they would cancel people as fast as
they could, you know, as fast as someone could write
a story. Can't do that anymore, and so you're having
people talk about the Liberty, USS Liberty and people talking
about Lavan affair. You're having them talk about how the
host of porn hellb and only fans and all, I'm
given eleven million dollars to a pack. I go, yeah,
look how much they gave the UDP. It's like, whenever
you see a big donation to APAC, it should always
check DMFI and UDP and some others, but like, at
least check those two because it's almost always more. And
like everyone listening to this, like learn about the United
Democracy Project because that is the shadow apack that is
probably more effective than a pack as far as collecting
donations goes.
Speaker 1: All right, well, I appreciate all this.
Speaker 2: And again, if you want to list and you want
to know the people and you want to know the
dirt on those people, just go listen to the Twitter
space I did, or you know what, I want to
write a subsack. Yeah, you can link to that, but
I'm gonna I'm gonna write it all down. Some people
would rather get the text, why not, We'll do that. Yeah,
I'll get WhatsApp too. Yeah, I'll write it all down.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because you're your Twitter space, you put it on
your on your sub stack, so yeah, people.
Speaker 2: Can yeah, I think, oh yeah, yeah, I put the
audio on sub SEC.
Speaker 1: I think, yes, yes you did, yep, you did. That's
where I listened to it.
Speaker 2: So but if I write it down, then people can
cut and pace certain names that you're interested in and
dig even more because I don't know how long I'm
supposed to talk about each person. I'm like, you want
to what else he did? You want to know what
else he did? You gotta get through it. But yeah,
I think I'll write it down. I'll make that for
I'll make it for subscribers and then i'll make a
public release down the road or something. But this is
maybe I'm just going to make it public. This stuff
is so important. I'm always torn. You have this problem.
You're like, well, I do need income, but I want
everyone to have this information and I want it before.
Speaker 1: The well, I mean, the people who listen to some
of my show are very generous. With are very generous,
I mean extremely generous. I could not I'm never going
to be able to thank them, so that you know,
if I thank them every second, and so the day
I die.
Speaker 2: Well there you go. I'll make it public, but donate anyway,
because the only reason I'm allowed to have so much
public stuff is because someone else is donating. I do
want to bring up one name before he clears out
in the WhatsApp group, and he's the richest guy that
we know of involved in this. That's Michael Dell from
Dell Computers. He's worth about one hundred and four billion
and he actually had to pay one hundred and four
million dollar settlement for fraud, which to the SEC Security
Exchange Commission. And I'm just thinking, why aren't you in
jail if you had to pay one hundred and four
million dollars? Why do you have your freedom? But you know,
when you're a billionaire is to know it's anarch tyranny
who sets the laws for different types of people. But uh, yeah,
he swindled about one point one billion from his shareholders.
The guy's a total schmuck to use a Jewish word.
He did illegal stock swap transactions. And of course he
is a member of the Friends of the IDF and
a lot of these groups. If you read Grant Smith's
book called Big Israel, which by the way, I'm going
to promote some books. Elon Pope has a book on
the lobby Merzheimer won't have a book on the lobby,
and Grant has a book on the lobby, and in
my opinion, thank you for what is worth. Grant Smith's
is the most hard hitting, but it's very nerdy. I
think you gotta just care about this a lot. But
he names them all and a lot of these groups
are friends of Da Da Da DA. Friends of the
IDF is one of the most disgusting of the filth
there is and he has given them millions of dollars.
That's Michael Dell and so he's he's just a criminal
because he had to pay one hundred and four million
dollars in settlements. Swindling criminal, and he's one of the
few that actually made a product. He made Dell. Almost
everyone else is a hedgy. But this, you know, imagine
being a billionaire and your big concern is, oh, no
people in on this campus, in that campus are protesting genocide.
We're gonna call them terrorist sympathizers and get facial recognition
and ruin their lives. There's a kind of sickness some
of these people have. If you had, if you were
a billionaire, imagine the good you could do in the world.
Where is our George Soros, you know, where's the good
guy's billionaire? That's you could be fixing problems so quickly,
and instead we're run by a criminal class of perverts,
a lot of them pedophiles. That's what we're up against.
And I always say demons need darkness, Like if you
can drag them into the light, it's over. If we
destroy their media monopoly, all these things that seemed to
impol Oh you can't get this guy elected, Yes, you
can through free speech. Israel's gonna fall apart. And if
they attack Lebanon link I think they're about to do,
they're gonna lose unless they knew them and if they
knew a non nuclear country, they still lose in the
long run because you're not in the United States. So
you can't get away with that.
Speaker 1: Well, all right, well plug anything you want and we'll
end this.
Speaker 2: I was gonna debunk Juneteenth, but too triggered debunked juneenth.
Come on, all right, Juneteenth was a holiday. Now about
Juneteenth go to America to deal with banking bs and
I needed an extra day to do what I had planned.
And they decided and I came up, was there on
June eighteenth, nineteenth twentieth twenties is Saturday, and they decided
to make June tenth the banker holiday after I'd flown
there from Korea, Like, what are you doing the sales pitch.
That's when slavery and the order for slavery to in
black slavery did in Texas occurred. Yeah, but slavery in
the United States didn't end. Black slavery was still legal
in Kentucky, Delaware, and New Jersey all the way until
the thirteenth Amendment. It was legal in New Jersey till
eighteen sixty sixth January, and that's just black slavery. They
still had Chinese slaves where cool they got paid, they're endingered.
Any serious person knows that was still slavery. And they
continue to script pay until the nineteen twenties, which is
also slavery because you can only spend it back at
the company's store. But they need this myth that the
old the Union was fighting to end slavery, even though
after the war's over three of their states still have slaves,
black slaves too, So I just want to point that out,
like they were not fighting to end slavery, and many
of them practiced slavery themselves, who wore blue uniforms and
participated in the war. It's just part of the narrative
to be like, see these evil Southerners, they're the ones
that did this. And Texas by and large was not
a huge state for slavery. It's not like Mississippi or something.
But they did. It was legal, and it's glad it's ended.
I mean, slavery is horrible, but it wasn't just like, Aha,
that was the last vestige of slavery in the United States.
It wasn't. If you want to have a holiday, it
should be December sixth, when the thirteenth Amendment passed to
end slavery, although that came with a caveat of occupation
and reconstruction and stealing personal property from people and stripping
other people of the rights, you know, and then the
Western expansion and genocide of American Indians, which is even
more racist and slavery whatever. I just I get triggered
when they have these things because it's covering it up
makes Texas look bad when you know they were not
the last state to have slavery, not even close. And
it just triggers me when people make a false history. Also,
I could go to the bank that day and I
needed to. I hated it before I before that happened,
but that just happened to me.
Speaker 1: Oh June's to me, it will always be the day
that the Rosenberg's met there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well they were hey man, they were found innocent later.
Speaker 1: Right, Uh, of course, just like Leo Frank Oh.
Speaker 2: Dude, you know what, all that stuff people are going
to revisit and now it's they're ready to listen. Oh,
tell me about that again. That's another thing that's happening.
As they see what Israel's doing and they see how
the media reacts versus what they can see on some
social media, They're like, wow, the censorship on YouTube, Facebook
is stuff. Is more than I realized. And then they
want to revisit, like if there wasn't really forty beheaded
babies in mass rape and all this crap they keep repeating,
have they ever lied about any other events? I'll just
leave that hanging. Might wonder, like I was just talking
about the Civil War, you might want to look at
a nuanced view of what actually happened there. You might
want to look at some of the other really big
wars the world wars for example, and yeah people why
during their war propaganda? Of course, but that would be
a whole nother show.
Speaker 1: We'll do Why don't you try to do those plugs
now and we'll get out of here.
Speaker 2: Well, we did one on reconstruction. People should listen to
that show? Was that with Libertarian Institute?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I was there, but I mean it's
it's it's on there. It's uh, it's in my back catalog.
I think your brother was on for that show too.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, that's right, Scott was on. That's
a good one. So I have a site called a
n C like anti Neocon a n C report dot com.
I have an X handle it's Rye Liberty. I just
chose that, not thinking i'd like be where I am,
so I didn't fall into it, but Rye Liberty. It
was banned until twenty twenty three. That was funny because
I had all these other accounts like Diane Rossen and
and like a whole bunch of things. It'd all get
banned within like seven days. The longest one was I
think eleven. I almost made it two weeks, but I've
got dedicated haters. But the one I made like in
two thousand and nine but then didn't get to use
was returned in twenty twenty three. Few temporary suspensions between
then and now, but that's the main X and it's
got over two hundred k, like two hundred and sixteen
or something wherever it is now. So that's going pretty
well for Twitter, considering there's no other on ramps. Not
very good for someone who's been doing this for twenty
five years, but really only a year because I'm not
allowed on anything. So there's Rye Liberty on X, there's
A and C Report, there's Ryan as on Rumble all
one word, and there's I don't you know what what
is my substack? Is it Rye Dawson or Ryan Dawson.
I don't even know. I think it's I think it's
Ryan Maybe, Yeah, it is okay at Ryan Dawson on substack.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Sometimes I've had to go to Rye because my name
has been banned on so many other things, so I
went from Ryan to Rye, you know, whatever it are. Sometimes.
So those are the main things. Substack and my website.
If you go to my website, which is it gets
attacked every morning, but that has the links to everything else. Well,
it'll have substack in Twitter and rumble on the main things. Well,
I have a locals which I just started building, and
I buy me a coffee, I buy me a koffee,
those kind of things. But I think the main the
best place to follow is the website. But if you're
a Twitter person, you might want to add Twitter. But
I have a little bit of edgy stuff there because
it's just X. But if you want like email notification
for articles and podcasts, then you probably want to add
to substack. And again you don't have to pay anything,
but I appreciate it if you did, but I put
out a ton of free content on substack. Yeah you
pay out of moral Yeah you should get.
Speaker 1: This all right, Ryn, Thank you, take care of a
good night man, thank you for giving me a voice,
or have a good day, considering it's my night, your day,