Speaker 1: And welcome back to The Michael Cohen Show. On our
continued journey to five hundred thousand, subscribers were almost at
three hundred. So if every one of you shares this
with one friend, we're already there, right, So hit subscribe,
watch comment. I like those comments, Keep them coming and
share with a friend. Because the nonsense, I say it
all the time, it's not stopping. Now. Yesterday Trump visited
the Kennedy Center. Well why shouldn't he. He's now on
top of being president of the United States, he's now
in charge of the Kennedy Center, and he didn't have
the best experience. Now, he got a minute into his
speech to the board when c Span cut the feed,
play the clip.
Speaker 2: A lot of money. Well, as you know, we put
down some early tariffs on people and countries that were
not treating us well.
Speaker 1: And that's both I'm going to be heard, but for
a second, that's that's I think that. Yeah, listen, they
were just not going to continue to air the nonsense.
Same nonsense though that we saw on Friday when JD.
Vance was heavily booed when arriving at the Kennedy Center.
Play that clip, did you kill that life? It's amazing, amazing.
They're only literally like fifty eight days into the presidency,
and that's already the beginning. That's just the first initial reaction. Now,
I want to show you Trump's respect. When asked about
this incident, play the clip.
Speaker 2: The president, the vice president at the Kennedy said, I
don't know about that. He's the most popular the vice
president we've had in years, so I don't know anything
about it. I think it did ask a question.
Speaker 1: What's wrong with asking a question like that? I mean,
there he is at the Kennedy Center and you're asked
about your vice president getting booed except for one idiot
that was standing there clapping. Why is this an improper question?
Because he doesn't like it, because there is no answer
that continues to send praise and to be laudatory to him. Now,
after calling out Biden's pardons because of alleged use of
an autopen, Trump was asked if he has ever used
an auto pen. Play the clip, and.
Speaker 2: You'll make your own determination.
Speaker 1: You have a criticised.
Speaker 2: Pus fives a auto community in the last few days.
Yourself ever used a cancer Yeah, only for very unimportant papers.
And I don't call him unimportant. If you do letters
where people write in and you know they'd love to
have a response to or write responses, and I'll sign
him whenever I can, but when I can't, I you know,
would use it an autopen. But to use him for
what they've used him for is terrible.
Speaker 1: Again, I'm not so sure why he's making a determination.
Maybe Joe Biden doesn't like his signature. So one thing
you have to acknowledge. Trump has a very distinct, a
very unique and a very interesting signature, so he likes
to use it. Okay, I'm all for that. Maybe Joe
Biden has sloppy handwriting and so therefore he likes to
use the autopen. The issue is not an autopin. The
issue is whether or not he authorized it. Because the president,
just as Donald Trump is president now has that has
that unique power conferred upon him to provide a pardon
any which way that he wants, and it is not questionable. Now,
one of the other things Trump refuses to take questions
from NBC. It's hysterical. It's hysterical. You have a legitimate
news outlet that's authorized to be there, that they are
what's called credentialed, and he just chooses not to not
to take any questions from them. Play the clip who
are you?
Speaker 3: Who are you?
Speaker 2: That's the same, the same one. I don't want I
don't want to talk to NBC anymore.
Speaker 3: I think he is so discredited.
Speaker 1: Why discredited because you don't like the question? Get used
to it. You see, notice who is at the bottom
showing this feed Newsmax. Sure we're all friendly with Chris Ruddy,
President's CEO. He's a member of mar A lago As. Absolutely,
I'll take questions from Newsmax because God forbid, God forbid
that the journalist, the reporter asked Trump a question that
irritates him, and it's coming from a Newsmax journalist or reporter.
He shit can before he even gets back to the office. Now,
if you remember, last week, Trump spoke at the DOJ
and he claimed that the reporting that NBC does is illegal,
not just that he doesn't like it, that it is illegal.
He also said that it is illegal to criticize judges. Okay,
play that clip.
Speaker 2: An Ami know this very well. We had an amazing
judge in Florida and her name is Eileen Cannon and
I didn't know her. I still don't know her. I
don't believe I ever spoke to her even during the trial,
but I did point her. Federal judge and these fake lawyers,
these horrible human beings were hitting her so hard public
relations wise. They were playing the ref I don't think
it's legal. I don't think it's legal. They might as
well go out and just shouted in a courthouse. They
were saying she was slow, she wasn't smart, she was
totally biased, she loved Trump. I didn't know her other
than I saw her a couple of days that I
was in court, and I thought her decorum was amazing.
Speaker 1: Isn't that exactly what the Republicans are doing right now
with this judge as an example, who's trying to stop
the deportations before due process. When you listen to members
of Congress like Representative Bishet, who turns around and says
exact actly the same thing about the judge. But I
guess it only applies one way, right, Well, of course,
and that's why in comes Carolyn Levitt Well. She's asked
about the irony of Trump's claims during a briefing yesterday.
Play the clip Hey.
Speaker 3: So on Friday, the President suggested at length that it
should be illegal to criticize judges, but he has repeatedly
criticized judges who rule against him. And Elon Musk is
calling for impeachment of judges who have opposed the administration.
So how are those two things not in conflict.
Speaker 4: I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.
I know you mentioned mister Musk's tweet, but I have
not heard the President of the United States ask that.
Speaker 1: Mary cool Yeah right, basically, take your questions, shove it
up your ass. I'm not answering it, all right because
she hasn't heard it. How about just turn it around
and say, all right, let me get back to you
on that one. We also, of course misspoke and said
that the DOJ is fighting law and order, which you
think about, it's exactly very true. What she obviously meant
to say is that the DOJ is going to fight
for law and order. But what she said is that
the DOJ is fighting law and order. Play the clip.
Speaker 4: We want to restore the Department of Justice to an
institution that focuses on fighting law and order in crime
and putting real criminals behind bars, not targeting Americans because
of their religion or their political speech. We saw that
under the previous administration, and it's unacceptable to this president and.
Speaker 1: Just the foot right again she meant fighting for law
and order. Question becomes, of course, who's law in order now?
Earlier today, I spoke about the deportation drama that's happening.
It's going to take place this entire week, if not longer.
Caroline Levitt addressed it as well. Like so many of them,
she made jokes and she laughed about it, as if
this is some sort of a funny that this is
a funny incident.
Speaker 4: Play the clip Biden administration abused to facilitate the mass
illegal entry of illegal immigrants into our country. It was
like a fast pass at Disneyland. That's not happening under
this administration. We are encouraging illegal immigrants to actively self
deport to maybe save themselves from being in one of
these fun videos for sure, John Good.
Speaker 1: Yes, oh fun video. Sure. Forget about the constitution, forget
about due process. We're going to do what we want.
And finally, to show literally to show her delusion, she
made another threatening joke about France and World War two.
Play that clip.
Speaker 5: Something different. There is now a member of the European
Parliament from f As who does not think the US
represents the values of the Statue of Liberty anymore. They
want the Statue of Liberty back. So is President Trump
going to send the Statute of Liberty back.
Speaker 4: It's to France, absolutely not. And my advice to that
unnamed low level French politician would be to remind them
that it's only because of the United States of America
that the French are not speaking German right now, So
they should be very grateful to our grade country.
Speaker 1: Kelly, like I've said so many times in the past,
she's actually very good at her job, which is to
continue the Trump message. And the only way that we're
going to remove people like Carolyn Levitt and so many
of these other individuals that just keep spewing the Trump
talking points again and again and again, it's to start
acting as one. The Democratic Party is desperate to again unite,
desperate to go into these towns, go into these town halls,
ones where Republicans refuse to because they are getting the
same sort of treatment that we saw jd. Vance and
Trump get. We need to take back the House, we
need to take back the Senate, and ultimately we need
to take back the White House. Why so that we
could put things back onto a path, a path where
our allies respect us, our adversaries sphere us instead of
the other way around. And as always, thanks for listening.
Hey everyone, First of all, thanks for watching. I mean,
we're going to be posting daily episodes with reactions and
talking about politics. We'll be talking about everything in fact,
so please liken subscribe join us on this journey