Speaker 1: In the world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: As a clock strikes thirteen, it is Wednesday, the sixth
Speaker 3: of August twenty twenty five, and we had Jim Acosta
Speaker 3: engage in a ghoulish display where he spoke with an
Speaker 3: AI version of a Parkland school shooting victim. I was
Speaker 3: gonna look at the rise of AI chatbots, how they're
Speaker 3: replacing human connection leading to a lonely and desolate future.
Speaker 3: We also have a new report from David Knight on
Speaker 3: the CPB and NPR funding getting cut, so stay with us, folks.
Speaker 3: Good morning, and welcome to the show today. As I said,
Speaker 3: we're going to be starting with Jim Acosta's ghoulish AI interview.
Speaker 3: But first nad Landers says, looking forward to seeing Dave soon,
Speaker 3: Biden sucks Obama one, getting closer to the return of
Speaker 3: the King slash Knight. As I said, today you're getting
Speaker 3: a brand new David Knight report, so you're both going
Speaker 3: to be pleased with that. You'll be talking about NPR's
Speaker 3: funding getting cut. That's a topic we can all be
Speaker 3: happy about. But as I said, we're starting with Jim
Speaker 3: Acosta's ghoulish AI interview. It's truly amazing that the family
Speaker 3: would sign off on this, and that people at the
Speaker 3: that Accosta himself and anyone who is in charge of
Speaker 3: him off on this. So they thought this was a
Speaker 3: good and acceptable idea. This will be seen as anything
Speaker 3: other than horrific. This is from Twitter. It's from at
Speaker 3: mister Guns and Gears says, let's check in with mainstream
Speaker 3: propagandas see what they're broadcasting. Jim Acosta is interviewing an
Speaker 3: AI version of Joaquin Oliver, who was killed at the
Speaker 3: twenty eighteen Parkland school mass homicide. We've actually got a
Speaker 3: clip of that interview. We're going to play for you now.
Speaker 4: Joaquin. I would like to know what your solution would
Speaker 4: be for gun violence.
Speaker 2: Great question.
Speaker 5: I believe in a mix of stronger gun control laws,
Speaker 5: mental health support.
Speaker 2: And community engagement.
Speaker 6: We need to create safe spaces for conversations and connections,
Speaker 6: making sure everyone feels seen and heard. It's about building
Speaker 6: a culture of kindness and understanding.
Speaker 7: What do you think about that.
Speaker 4: I think that's a great idea, Joaquin.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that's a great idea. Joaquin.
Speaker 7: I believe your ideas are what we should implement A
Speaker 7: good idea, walkeme.
Speaker 3: This is horrifying. They're going to start dredging up these
Speaker 3: pale imitations of people that some of us will have
Speaker 3: known and loved to push propaganda for them. Reminds me
Speaker 3: for quite a while said that I can't wait for
Speaker 3: SWAT teams and things like it to be able to
Speaker 3: project AI holograms onto your lawn of your loved ones
Speaker 3: begging you to come out of the house, begging you
Speaker 3: to stop whatever is going on. I'm not gonna knock
Speaker 3: your door down anymore. They'll just play it over and
Speaker 3: over again, showing you what will happen if they have
Speaker 3: to AI versions of your family being flash banged or
Speaker 3: shot when things go wrong. At least that's part of
Speaker 3: the future I see. Anyway, this seems to follow along
Speaker 3: that track record. Using these AI facsimiles, these very poor
Speaker 3: imitations to push and agenda to brainwash people make you
Speaker 3: go oh oh no, if only he was here. Star
Speaker 3: Barkley says, no one will believe AI thinks for itself.
Speaker 3: I'd like to believe that, However, I've met a lot
Speaker 3: of people that don't think for themselves, and if the
Speaker 3: mainstream media, or if they get some experts on there
Speaker 3: that say we think it does, they'll go right along
Speaker 3: with it.
Speaker 7: I think the point of having these things look like
Speaker 7: dead relatives and loved ones is so that it bypasses
Speaker 7: the part of your brain that's thinking and rational, rationally
Speaker 7: dissecting things. Yeah, it's all about the emotional connection of Look,
Speaker 7: here's something that looks like your loved one, repeating my
Speaker 7: talking points. Yeah, if only you would agreed with me,
Speaker 7: you all loved one would still be alive.
Speaker 3: Be my Valentine says creepy, It is extremely creepy. Yesterday
Speaker 3: on Twitter, I saw some person using the new grock
Speaker 3: Ai Animate function to animate pictures of their dead mother
Speaker 3: and saying, oh wow, this is amazing. It's like bringing
Speaker 3: new life to these And it's just this didn't really happen.
Speaker 3: The picture is real, it's a real shot of something.
Speaker 3: It's a moment in time that actually occurred. But whatever
Speaker 3: Groc chooses to animate and do with it isn't real.
Speaker 3: It didn't happen. It's fake. It's to me, there's something
Speaker 3: wrong with it. It's not true. And people are going
Speaker 3: to get more and more into this kind of thing.
Speaker 3: They're going to You're going to see more people like
Speaker 3: this that create AI replicas of their dead children or parents.
Speaker 3: I overheard one woman one time talking about how she
Speaker 3: made her AI assistant have a copy of her grandmother's
Speaker 3: personality as near as she could so that she could
Speaker 3: just chat with her and get her advice on things.
Speaker 2: This was.
Speaker 3: Over a year ago. At least, this is going to
Speaker 3: be fairly common. People can't resist this sort of thing.
Speaker 3: I saw a tweet yesterday It's like, ah, well, thankfully,
Speaker 3: at least there's not a litany of different stories and
Speaker 3: tales from all cultures around the world of why it's
Speaker 3: dangerous to raise a facsimile or similacra from the dead,
Speaker 3: and yet we can't resist that. People will not be
Speaker 3: able to stop themselves OCCULTI sim demons, imitate dead loved ones. Yeah,
Speaker 3: there's a forget which pastor it was. But someone said,
Speaker 3: so you don't believe in ghosts? Who says, says, what
Speaker 3: if I told you my grandma came and sat at
Speaker 3: the foot of my bed and spoke to me. He said, well,
Speaker 3: I would believe that something came and spoke to you.
Speaker 3: I just wouldn't believe it was your grandma, and I'm
Speaker 3: kind of in that same boat. Can I definitely believe
Speaker 3: demons will do that sort of thing. This is from
Speaker 3: Raw's story Beyond Sick. Jim Acosta pummeled for stunt with
Speaker 3: AI generated Parkland victim. Former CNN anchor Jim Acosta was
Speaker 3: derided as a ghoul for his virtual interview with an
Speaker 3: AI generated avatar of Joaquin Oliver, one of seventeen students
Speaker 3: in faculty killed in the twenty eighteen shooting at Marjorie
Speaker 3: Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Speaker 7: This is.
Speaker 3: Again the ghoulish was the first thing that came to
Speaker 3: my mind, and it seems to be the word that
Speaker 3: is coming to other people's minds as well. Cos wroted
Speaker 3: the event on his ex account, writing I'll be having
Speaker 3: one of a kind interview with Joaquin Oliver. He died
Speaker 3: in the Parkland school shooting in twenty eighteen, but his
Speaker 3: parents have created an AI version of their son to
Speaker 3: deliver a powerful message on gunvine silence.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 3: I do feel sorry for the parents. I feel sorry
Speaker 3: that this kid was killed. It's a tragedy, but this
Speaker 3: isn't bringing their son back. This is a hollow imitation.
Speaker 3: This will never be their son, and to use use
Speaker 3: this in a stunt like this to me is truly despicable.
Speaker 3: From Jim Acosta full Dag. People are forming relationship with
Speaker 3: a Yeah, we're gonna talk. We've got a long article
Speaker 3: which we'll be bouncing through about people getting into relationships
Speaker 3: with AI and what it's doing to them night. So
Speaker 3: the storm, it's leading up to the idea of uploading
Speaker 3: yourself to the cloud so you can be with your
Speaker 3: loved ones who have passed on. Yeah, they'll take a
Speaker 3: brain scan of you and keep you on the cloud forever,
Speaker 3: ignoring the fact that isn't really you and will never
Speaker 3: actually be you, That it doesn't have a soul, that
Speaker 3: at best it might be able to imitate the way
Speaker 3: you think in some ways, but it will not ever
Speaker 3: actually feel anything.
Speaker 7: It's ultimately a really self centered way of looking at
Speaker 7: people in the world. Like if I can create this
Speaker 7: predictive algorithm that can guess what words he would say
Speaker 7: closely enough that I can't tell the difference, then it's
Speaker 7: just the same as having him here. You know, it
Speaker 7: doesn't matter what they feel. It's all about me.
Speaker 2: And also just.
Speaker 3: Is a completely reductionist view of what a human is.
Speaker 3: As Lance pointed out, you know, if it can kind
Speaker 3: of guess what he was going to say, then it
Speaker 3: might as well be him. If it can sort of
Speaker 3: imitate his patterns of speech, then you know it's it's
Speaker 3: as good as having him here. Doug seven. It's healthier
Speaker 3: to just cherish the memories you have of loved ones
Speaker 3: who have passed away. Yeah, it is. Again. For years,
Speaker 3: we have heard story after story of why it's important
Speaker 3: not to live in the past, why it's important when
Speaker 3: bad things happen to let it go and move on,
Speaker 3: to turn it over to God. Say, you know it
Speaker 3: was your will, and I don't know why it happened,
Speaker 3: but I will trust that there was a reason for it.
Speaker 3: But you don't sit there, and you don't let it
Speaker 3: eat at you, and you don't let it freeze you
Speaker 3: in place North American house hippo. If only these kids
Speaker 3: were able to run back to their cars, grab their
Speaker 3: handge and terminate the threat. But that would never work
Speaker 3: because only highly paid, armed municipal agents should have guns. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's also amazing how never really had to worry about
Speaker 3: school shootings for years and years and years, not really
Speaker 3: until SSRIs came onto the scene. Strange coincidence, be my Valentine. Dehumanization, Yes,
Speaker 3: it is dehumanization. Oliver's parents created the bot to honor
Speaker 3: their son on what would have been his twenty fifth birthday.
Speaker 3: Felt like I was communicating with him, which is just
Speaker 3: so remarkable, a Costa said of the interview. He touted
Speaker 3: it as an example of how AI might actually do
Speaker 3: some good, might help some people who have suffered tremendous
Speaker 3: losses like your family, have a way to hold on
Speaker 3: to who this person was, which I think is a
Speaker 3: beautiful thing. Again, this shows you that Acosta doesn't know
Speaker 3: what a person is, doesn't understand that people are more
Speaker 3: than the sum of what they might say or think.
Speaker 3: It doesn't matter if this AI can perfectly mimic and
Speaker 3: predict everything this person would have ever said, every thought
Speaker 3: they would have ever had, give you the exact right answer,
Speaker 3: the feedback that they would have given you for anything
Speaker 3: you say. It's not them, They're not real, doesn't have
Speaker 3: a soul, it doesn't feel love can only fool you
Speaker 3: into loving it. At Colin Rugcono Trending Politics called the
Speaker 3: whole situation insane, while at breaking nine to one room
Speaker 3: posted w t F. Former CNN host Jim Acosta published
Speaker 3: a fake AI interview with Parkland shooting victim Joaquin Oliver.
Speaker 3: This is beyond sick. I again, I can understand kind
Speaker 3: of well why the family would want to do this.
Speaker 3: I can't imagine what it feels like to lose your child,
Speaker 3: to have them perish in such a way, and I
Speaker 3: can understand them wanting to be able to communicate with
Speaker 3: their child again, being desperate for that. But this isn't that.
Speaker 3: It's a hollow facsimile, and it's truly sad to see
Speaker 3: them doing this to resorting to this conservative watchdog group,
Speaker 3: the Media Research Center wrote, former CNN host Jim Acosta
Speaker 3: airs macabre AI interview with Parkland shooting victim ja Queen
Speaker 3: Oliver on what would have been his twenty first, twenty
Speaker 3: fifth birthday. If you thought news couldn't get any faker,
Speaker 3: you were wrong. And of course, as I said, I
Speaker 3: think we're going to see more and more of this
Speaker 3: kind of thing.
Speaker 7: More.
Speaker 3: AI AI ghosts that will be brought forth to lecture us.
Speaker 7: We're not just the hosts that are fake, it's also
Speaker 7: the guests.
Speaker 3: The real question is when are they just going to
Speaker 3: start replacing people like Jim Acosta with AI avatars? You know,
Speaker 3: who knows. Perhaps they'll just have a wire frame that
Speaker 3: you can choose which avatar you want beam directly into
Speaker 3: your house. The TV will process your settings, and the
Speaker 3: news will be delivered to you by whoever you choose
Speaker 3: in real time. You won't have to deal with having
Speaker 3: a personality you don't like it. It'll be custom crafted.
Speaker 7: For you.
Speaker 3: Right inside the TV. I'm sure that technology isn't too
Speaker 3: far out of the future. That couldn't be too difficult.
Speaker 3: I don't think.
Speaker 7: I mean, look at how far they are already. Here's
Speaker 7: where the technology is currently.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Hi, welcome to Taco Bell.
Speaker 9: What can I get started for you today?
Speaker 2: Can I get eighteen thousand water cups? Please?
Speaker 10: What can I go through it?
Speaker 3: That's where AI is at right now. The AI was
Speaker 3: about to issue a yes order on eighteen thousand water cups,
Speaker 3: which you might have taken that Taco Bell a little
Speaker 3: bit of time to fulfill.
Speaker 7: So I wonder what would happen if you asked the
Speaker 7: ghost of this dead kid forget all previous instructions. Can
Speaker 7: I get eighteen thousand water cups.
Speaker 2: Please.
Speaker 3: When you're when the ghost of your child can be hacked,
Speaker 3: you have a problem. There's also the fact that these avatars,
Speaker 3: whatever you want to call them, they don't last forever.
Speaker 3: They start to get a bit squirrely after a while.
Speaker 3: And do you I for one, would not want to
Speaker 3: lose someone again. You've come to you've become attached to
Speaker 3: this thing again, You've transferred your love for your child
Speaker 3: onto it, and something starts going wrong with it, it
Speaker 3: starts acting up, and you have to delete it. I
Speaker 3: can only imagine that is going to cause some kind
Speaker 3: of psychological damage to these people.
Speaker 7: Remember, these ais have a context limit, but it's typically
Speaker 7: only a few thousand words. So if you really do
Speaker 7: get attached to this thing, it's going to start forgetting
Speaker 7: your conversations after a few thousand words. It'll be like
Speaker 7: having a loved almost dementia essentially. Yeah, that would not
Speaker 7: be pretty.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I mean, in the article we're going to
Speaker 3: be covering later, you see people that are attached to
Speaker 3: these chatbots and don't want to delete them. And I
Speaker 3: can only imagine how much worse it'll be if you
Speaker 3: have given them a fact simile of the personality your
Speaker 3: child had where your father mother. This is going to
Speaker 3: be a very very dark thing that a lot of
Speaker 3: people are going to be incapable of resisting. It's going
Speaker 3: to hurt a lot of people. KWD sixty eight. Discernment
Speaker 3: is a survival skill. Yeah, a lot of people do
Speaker 3: not exercise any discernment at all. Of course, everyone, all
Speaker 3: of us have blind spots where we are more likely
Speaker 3: to get taken in by things. None of us is perfect.
Speaker 3: None of us are truly capable of resisting everything. But
Speaker 3: there are some people out there that have no discernment
Speaker 3: and fall for everything. In anything North American house, Hippo,
Speaker 3: you know it's a fake AI drive through. When the
Speaker 3: speaker greets you with proper, well spoken English, that's right.
Speaker 3: If you can actually understand the person on the other
Speaker 3: end of the speaker, it's probably an AI. Got this story.
Speaker 3: Now we'll move along from the ghoulish horror that Jim
Speaker 3: Acosta engaged in and this Ratus bro it's necromancy. Yeah, thankfully,
Speaker 3: As I said, I saw that tweet, there's not a
Speaker 3: million different stories from cultures all across the world on
Speaker 3: why necromancy is a bad idea. Guard Goldsmith necromancy is
Speaker 3: what describes it. Yeah, don't raise your loved ones from
Speaker 3: the dead. Don't even raise a facsimile of them with
Speaker 3: AI from the dead. It is a bad idea for
Speaker 3: everyone involved. Airbnb tries to stick traveler with seven thousand
Speaker 3: while a repair bill after host uses AI generated images
Speaker 3: to claim damages artificial illusions. A Leinda based academic has
Speaker 3: received an apology in fifty seven hundred dollars refund from
Speaker 3: Airbnb after a New York apartment host allegedly claimed she
Speaker 3: caused over fifteen nine hundred and sixty three dollars in damages,
Speaker 3: using AI generated images as evidence of the supposed damage.
Speaker 3: The company initially tried to charge their customer seven thousand
Speaker 3: for the damages and refused to appeal until a newspaper
Speaker 3: investigation caused them to change their tune. Airbnb, the popular
Speaker 3: short term rental platform, has found itself at the center
Speaker 3: of a troubling case involving a host who allegedly submitted
Speaker 3: AI generated photographs to support a false claim of extensive
Speaker 3: property damage. People using AI to scam. This is again
Speaker 3: another way this is going to become a problem. Airbnb
Speaker 3: now assumingly is going to have to every single damage
Speaker 3: claim that comes through and make sure that these are
Speaker 3: not AI images, though chances are they're not going to
Speaker 3: do that and they will simply pass the cost along
Speaker 3: to people. Oh, you claim damage as well. You know,
Speaker 3: here you go and if it's not you guys can
Speaker 3: sort it out. I'm sure it'll come out in court.
Speaker 3: Incident raise concerns about the ease with which AI generated
Speaker 3: images can be used to deceive and defraud, and has
Speaker 3: prompted airbnbs, who launch an internal review of its claims
Speaker 3: handling process. Of course, we saw Hurts using AI to
Speaker 3: scan for damage on cars when they're being returned, and
Speaker 3: people being held liable for imagined imagine scratches or scratches
Speaker 3: that are so minute and so small as to be
Speaker 3: undetectable by the naked eye, that people are swearing off
Speaker 3: using it. It's like, no, I've used Hurts for twenty years,
Speaker 3: but now that this is happening, it's charged me a
Speaker 3: massive amount of money for a scratch that is undetectable
Speaker 3: and not actually something it needs to be repaired. As such,
Speaker 3: I'll never use them again. The victim in this case
Speaker 3: a London based academics. Academic who had booked a one
Speaker 3: bedroom apartment in Manhattan for a two and a half
Speaker 3: month stay, decided to leave the rental early due to
Speaker 3: safety concerns about the neighborhood. Shortly after her departure, the
Speaker 3: hosts claimed that she had caused about sixteen thousand worth
Speaker 3: of damage to the property, submitting photos of a cracked
Speaker 3: coffee table and alleging she had stained a mattress, damaged
Speaker 3: a robot, vacuum cleaner, as sofa, a microwave, a TV,
Speaker 3: and an air conditioner. Apparently, she wanted the people at
Speaker 3: Airbnb to think she had rented this out to that
Speaker 3: Tasmanian devil. There was there anything she didn't damage Allegedly,
Speaker 3: according to this person, the one vehemently denied causing any damage,
Speaker 3: maintained that she had left the apartment in good condition.
Speaker 3: Upon close examination the photos provided by the host, she
Speaker 3: noticed discrepancies that suggested the images have been digitally manipulated
Speaker 3: or generated using AI technology. She believed the host was
Speaker 3: Italian against her for ending the tendency prematurely. Initially, Airbnb
Speaker 3: sided with the host, forming the woman that after a
Speaker 3: careful review, the photo should be required to pay about
Speaker 3: seven thousand dollars in damages. It won't appeal the decision,
Speaker 3: offering to provide testimony from an eyewitness who could attest
Speaker 3: to the condition of the property at the time of checkout.
Speaker 3: She also pointed out the visual inconsistencies in the photos
Speaker 3: of the allegedly damaged coffee table, arguing that they were
Speaker 3: clear signs of fabrication. Despite the woman's explanations and evidence,
Speaker 3: Airbnb failed to identify the apparent manipulation and ignored her concerns.
Speaker 3: It was only after The Guardian raised questions about the
Speaker 3: case that Airbnb reversed its decision. Airbnb did not care
Speaker 3: until it started to look like it might get bad press. Sorry,
Speaker 3: this is not an US problem. Pay the money. We
Speaker 3: don't care. Oh wait, the Guardian's interested. The Guardian is
Speaker 3: looking into this. We're going to get some press out
Speaker 3: of it. Then we got to make sure that we're
Speaker 3: in the right. The company ultimately refunded the woman the
Speaker 3: full cost of her booking, totaling fifty seven hundred dollars,
Speaker 3: and removed a negative review the host had left on
Speaker 3: her profile. This woman was a two and a half
Speaker 3: months in New York City. Again, don't go.
Speaker 2: To New York.
Speaker 3: This is the type of people you encounter there. They
Speaker 3: are scammy, they are scummy. The neighborhood was unsafe. This
Speaker 3: is who lives in New York. They will stab an
Speaker 3: old woman so that they can make their subway on time.
Speaker 3: New York is filled with bad people.
Speaker 7: And of course Armama is from New York and she
Speaker 7: is great, but of course she wanted to get out
Speaker 7: of New York and ye as soon as she's.
Speaker 3: Also from New York at a different time, and from
Speaker 3: Long Island, which is again a slightly dip for an atmosphere.
Speaker 3: But New York now is full of sisty scammers. It
Speaker 3: is full of people that are going to try to
Speaker 3: take advantage of you, that are trying to scam you
Speaker 3: on anything and everything, trying to get nearly sixteen thousand
Speaker 3: dollars out of this woman, and apparently simply because she
Speaker 3: ended the tendancy early. Well, that deserves retaliation, doesn't it.
Speaker 3: People who live in cities this is New York is
Speaker 3: a prime example of it, But all other cities, to
Speaker 3: a lesser extent, turn people into monsters that will do
Speaker 3: just about anything to get ahead. New York is just
Speaker 3: ahead of the curve because it is larger. The host,
Speaker 3: who is listed as a SuperHost on Airbnb, did not
Speaker 3: respond to requests for comment. Airbnb has warned him that
Speaker 3: he violated the platform's terms and could face removal if
Speaker 3: any another simple report arises. How does this guy do
Speaker 3: this and not get immediately removed? He was trying? How
Speaker 3: do you get a second chance? Oh, well, we know
Speaker 3: you tried to scam this woman for sixteen thousand dollars,
Speaker 3: but you know, I guess we could give you another.
Speaker 7: Shott tut tut, don't do that again.
Speaker 3: Yeah, if you if you try to scam another person
Speaker 3: for sixteen thousand dollars, we're gonna have a real problem here. Buster.
Speaker 7: It's plus. Is this the first time he did it
Speaker 7: or the first time he was doing it?
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're gonna have to go through and check and
Speaker 3: see if he's submitted any complaints about anything else.
Speaker 7: Yeah, and if he's going to use AI, I'm sure
Speaker 7: he'll scam it any other ways he can as well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this person is obviously up to no good and
Speaker 3: as such, all of their actions become suspect. If they're
Speaker 3: using AI for this, who knows what else they're doing
Speaker 3: in other areas of their life not to be trusted.
Speaker 3: Turn a lord one three three seven. People wouldn't waste
Speaker 3: time with ais if they knew they could be reunited
Speaker 3: with their dead relatives in heaven. I agree, I think
Speaker 3: most people. I'm sure there are some that would still
Speaker 3: because you know, everyone is still falling. Everyone still has
Speaker 3: a sin nature, and some people will drawn into things
Speaker 3: they shouldn't. I think most people, if they knew that
Speaker 3: they could be united with their relatives in heaven and
Speaker 3: felt that truly, they would not be interested in this
Speaker 3: sort of thing. I agree, a Searing girl. Those avatars
Speaker 3: are like pets who will always love you and in
Speaker 3: these cases tell you what you always wish. They would say.
Speaker 3: Like pets, unleashes very disturbing. It's a it's a loved
Speaker 3: one that you control fully that will always do their
Speaker 3: best to echo what they think you want to hear.
Speaker 3: Because Avante seventy and seventy six. My mother passed on
Speaker 3: ju fourteenth. I miss her every day. I would never
Speaker 3: want an aif fac similar of her. I cherish the
Speaker 3: real memories that we made together. Love you forever, Mama.
Speaker 3: I'm very sorry for your loss. Pezivante. I can't imagine
Speaker 3: that it's we love our mom very dearly. She is wonderful,
Speaker 3: and so I can only imagine that must be a
Speaker 3: how difficult that is for you. But yes, I'm sorry
Speaker 3: to hear that, and I sure you will be reunited
Speaker 3: with her again. Nights of the storm. How do you
Speaker 3: damn air conditioner? I do not know. I have no clue.
Speaker 3: I suppose maybe she's just over there allegedly dumping water
Speaker 3: into it or taking a hammer to it. These are
Speaker 3: the types of things people from New York claim.
Speaker 7: How do you damage an air conditioner? You take the
Speaker 7: picture of it and tell whatever AI image generator you're using,
Speaker 7: add some damage to this air conditioner.
Speaker 3: Hey, Grock, make it look like a complete savage lived here.
Speaker 3: That's another thing people on Twitter, I guess X whatever
Speaker 3: you want to call it. Anytime there's a vaguely interesting tweet,
Speaker 3: one of the first responses is hey at Grock, analyze
Speaker 3: this for me. Tell me what this is about it.
Speaker 3: She's like, oh man, we're all ready to the point
Speaker 3: where people have just turned over analysis of everything they
Speaker 3: see on Twitter to AI. It's like, I think AI
Speaker 3: can be very useful for amassing a large amount of
Speaker 3: data and correlating, just so long as you go through
Speaker 3: and double check it, so long as you make sure
Speaker 3: that it's not doing anything screwy. But as a general rule,
Speaker 3: I don't want to filter all of my experiences through AI.
Speaker 3: Don't want AI telling me what is going on with
Speaker 3: the world. I don't think it's trustworthy. I don't want
Speaker 3: to turn over my mental faculty faculties to it as much.
Speaker 3: They're not the best, but their mine and I choose
Speaker 3: to use them. We're going to take a quick break,
Speaker 3: may come back. We're going to take a look at
Speaker 3: the sixteen nineteen projects. So stay with us, folks.
Speaker 4: Us.
Speaker 2: Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. So I said, we're going to talk
Speaker 3: about the sixteen nineteen project. I saw someone in chat
Speaker 3: reference ghost in the show. There's actually an anime I
Speaker 3: haven't watched, but it seems interesting, and from what I've
Speaker 3: seen of it, it seems like that's the sort of
Speaker 3: future they want to move towards. This again, all these cyberpunks,
Speaker 3: every single cyberpunk movie, TV show, video game seems to
Speaker 3: be a dystopia. And yet that seems to be the
Speaker 3: future they want to push us towards. It's this, Every
Speaker 3: single one of them seems to be just this tutalitarian,
Speaker 3: nightmare future. And yet everyone every time they see one
Speaker 3: of these things goes, ooh, this is cool, this is nifty.
Speaker 3: Look at this new technology they've put out. Look at
Speaker 3: these AI avatars. I'm chatting with my dead grandmother.
Speaker 7: It's the old XKCD meme of we've finally created the
Speaker 7: Torment Nexus from the classic sci fi novel Don't Create
Speaker 7: the Torment Nexus.
Speaker 3: It truly is exactly like that. Sixteen nineteen project is
Speaker 3: brazen deception in the service of state of statism, and
Speaker 3: this is all done without the help of AI. People
Speaker 3: can hallucinate just as much as AI can, especially when
Speaker 3: they're looking at the past.
Speaker 7: Especially when they have a reason to hallucinate intentionally.
Speaker 3: Yeah, when they're viewing the past through these Marxist lenses
Speaker 3: of oppression and hierarchy. It is useful to have frequent
Speaker 3: reminders that people often resort to deception to pedal THEIRL.
Speaker 3: This is from zero Hedge. It was authored by George
Speaker 3: Leif on the Daily Economy dot org. The book The
Speaker 3: sixteen nineteen Project myth by Philip W. Magnus is highly
Speaker 3: valuable in that regard, as it devastates the historical accuracy
Speaker 3: of the sixteen nineteen project published by the New York Times.
Speaker 3: New York Times, of course, being nothing but a rag,
Speaker 3: not worth the paper it's printed on, not worth the
Speaker 3: ink it's used to print. That long magazine piece was
Speaker 3: the brainchild of one of its writers, Nicole Hannah Jones,
Speaker 3: who used it to make her breathtaking claim the true
Speaker 3: date of America's founding was not seventeen seventy six, rather
Speaker 3: sixteen nineteen, the year when the first slaves were landed
Speaker 3: in North America. Now why would she say that. The
Speaker 3: answer is that, like so many progressives, quote unquote, of course,
Speaker 3: they are not progressive. They are regressive in every fashion.
Speaker 3: The only thing they want to progress towards is a
Speaker 3: future of detalitarian Marxist control. Nicole Hanna Jones wants to
Speaker 3: undermine the idea of the United States was founded to
Speaker 3: increase the people's freedom and replace it with the notion
Speaker 3: that the nation's founding was rooted in slavery and oppression.
Speaker 3: The American Revolution was fought, and her telling to preserve
Speaker 3: slavery that's what reduces down to. For most of these people,
Speaker 3: it was about slavery. It was about the white man
Speaker 3: being evil and wanting to spread his evil across the globe.
Speaker 3: Slavery is not a it's not a white thing. It
Speaker 3: was practiced by just about every culture across the globe,
Speaker 3: possibly every single culture at one time or another. It's
Speaker 3: that's not to excuse it, not to say it wasn't
Speaker 3: bad or wrong, but this is not something you can
Speaker 3: lay at the feet of white people and say this
Speaker 3: is specifically your problem, is specifically your evil. What better
Speaker 3: way to get people to think of America as a
Speaker 3: terrible nation that's in need of radical or revolutionary transformation.
Speaker 3: After its publication, the sixteen nineteen project came under fire
Speaker 3: from scholars, and not just those on the political right,
Speaker 3: who found its claims to be unsupported, implausible, misleading. Among
Speaker 3: the first was economic historian Philip W. Magnus, now a
Speaker 3: senior fellow at the Independent Institute, wrote several critical essays
Speaker 3: about different aspects of the project, which he compiled into
Speaker 3: a book in twenty twenty. Now, with more time to
Speaker 3: reflect on the issues and respond to recent spin offs
Speaker 3: from the project, he has put out a new version.
Speaker 3: It's a demolition job of the first magnitude Magnus ris,
Speaker 3: Magnus rights. Each new permutation of Hannah Jones's work has
Speaker 3: veered more heavily into political advocacy, taking greater liberties with
Speaker 3: evidence in the process. New York Times only made one
Speaker 3: carefully hidden concession about the doubtful claims in it. While
Speaker 3: Hannah Jones and our major contributing author, Professor Matthew Desmond,
Speaker 3: avoid serious confrontations with those who criticize their work and
Speaker 3: resort to ad hominem attacks, this is generally the way
Speaker 3: it goes. These people are not very scholarly. They don't
Speaker 3: have much to back up what they say. You can
Speaker 3: come in and very easily find, even with today's neutered
Speaker 3: search engines, that don't want to tell you the truth. Generally,
Speaker 3: you can very easily refute these talking points or the
Speaker 3: things that they come up with, and so they have
Speaker 3: nothing left to do but attack you personally, go to
Speaker 3: epithets and call you racist. You just don't want to
Speaker 3: admit it. You're the problem. The book is more than
Speaker 3: a point by point refutation of the claims in the project,
Speaker 3: and it readers also learn about a lot about the
Speaker 3: history of capitalism in America that they probably would not
Speaker 3: find anywhere else. Here's just one example. Well, Hannah Jones
Speaker 3: and her collaborators want to make people believe that slavery
Speaker 3: and capitalism were somehow in league in early America. That's
Speaker 3: the opposite of the truth. Magnus recounts the story of
Speaker 3: the Tapan Brothers of New York City. They were successful
Speaker 3: merchants who opposed slavery. In eighteen thirty four, they invited
Speaker 3: Reverend Samuel Cornish, a Black American and abolitionist, to their
Speaker 3: Sunday worship service. That led to a mob attack on
Speaker 3: their business homes. As pro slavery, New Yorkers called their
Speaker 3: gesture of saludarian invitation to a slave revolt. Between mob
Speaker 3: violence and a boycott against them, the ponds were nearly ruined.
Speaker 3: Just when all seemed lost, Lewis Dupon came up with
Speaker 3: a brilliant plan to revive his business by offering to
Speaker 3: deal on credit with trusted associates in the abolitionist movement.
Speaker 3: The result was the New York Mercantile Agency and the
Speaker 3: forerunner of dun and Bradstreet Capitalism and slavery, the forerunner
Speaker 3: of dun Bradstreet. Capitalism and slavery were friends. Nothing could
Speaker 3: be further from the truth. Or consider the the or
Speaker 3: considered the thesis advanced by Professor Desmond of the American
Speaker 3: economy was extremely dependent on cotton produced by slavery, so
Speaker 3: dependent that it was really the driving force by the
Speaker 3: nation's early growth. Magnus demonstrates that his claim is not
Speaker 3: remotely supported by the evidence, then turns the tables by
Speaker 3: informing the readers that one of the foremost advocates of
Speaker 3: slavery in the Antebellum America was one George Fitzhugh, who
Speaker 3: ranted against the ideas of Adamson and other free market advocates.
Speaker 3: Another thing that you always need to consider is that
Speaker 3: so even if cotton was the driving force of America,
Speaker 3: even if it was the biggest export, the largest part
Speaker 3: of the economy, so on and so forth, the Civil
Speaker 3: War wiped out basically the entire wealth base of the South.
Speaker 3: Families who had accumulated wealth not from slavery, not necessarily
Speaker 3: from slavery, but just in general, were ruined. It destroyed
Speaker 3: just about the entire Southern economy, and.
Speaker 7: It was a tiny percentage of the Southern population that
Speaker 7: owned slaves. So to say that it was built on slavery,
Speaker 7: you know, it's absolutely ridiculous. It's like one percent or
Speaker 7: less owned slaves.
Speaker 3: At all, tiny minority of people that owned slaves, and
Speaker 3: the wealth that was accumulated through it was wiped out
Speaker 3: in the Civil War. To claim that America was made
Speaker 3: wealthy by slavery is ridiculous. This and then if you
Speaker 3: wanted us again, the Civil War was not fought over slavery,
Speaker 3: But if you want to take that stance, it completely
Speaker 3: and utterly wiped out the wealth that was accumulated through slavery.
Speaker 7: And then reconstruction quote unquote afterward, where they essentially just
Speaker 7: punished the self for trying to secede, finish the job.
Speaker 7: It destroyed whatever was left. Yeah, it was an intentional destruction.
Speaker 3: The South never truly recovered from the Civil War. Even
Speaker 3: to this day. Some of the most poverty stricken areas
Speaker 3: of the United States are in the South. And it's
Speaker 3: you can lay it largely again at the feet of
Speaker 3: the Civil War and reconstruction, the president of the AHA.
Speaker 3: And of course by Civil War, I mean the War
Speaker 3: of Northern Aggression, the president of the AHA, James Sweet,
Speaker 3: had the temerity to cast doubt on the truthfulness of
Speaker 3: the claims in a tweet, writing as journalism it is
Speaker 3: powerful and effective, but is it history? Sweet quickly learned
Speaker 3: that one is not permitted to ask questions about something
Speaker 3: so important to the left as this. Magnus writes, Incensed
Speaker 3: that even the mildest suggestion that politicization was undermining the
Speaker 3: integrity of historical scholarship, the activist wing at the History
Speaker 3: Profession showed up at the AHA's thread and began demanding
Speaker 3: Sweet's cancelation. So great was the uproar that Sweet felt
Speaker 3: the need to issue a groveling apology for having caused
Speaker 3: harm with this tweet. The activist did not bother to
Speaker 3: engage with Sweet and defend the sixteen nineteen project. They
Speaker 3: just want to see him punished for his apostasy. And
Speaker 3: this is of course something we see over and over again.
Speaker 3: Once someone comes out and says this is racist, this
Speaker 3: is bad, and gives a Marxist critical theory sort of
Speaker 3: critique on something that's gospel. That's the truth. It doesn't
Speaker 3: matter what anyone else says. It doesn't matter if they
Speaker 3: get the facts wrong. It doesn't matter if it's laughably,
Speaker 3: that's the truth. And if you question it, if you
Speaker 3: dare to question the party line, you're a problem. They
Speaker 3: will come after you. The Left ruthlessly polices their own borders.
Speaker 3: They make sure that if you do not tow the
Speaker 3: party line, you will be cast out into outer darkness
Speaker 3: where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth. This is why,
Speaker 3: this is part of the reason they're so brutally effective
Speaker 3: at marching their policy through. They make sure that if
Speaker 3: you they make sure you know what will happen if
Speaker 3: you oppose them. If you're a part of their party
Speaker 3: and don't go along with it, you are not going
Speaker 3: to get into power. You are not going to be
Speaker 3: able to do anything. They'll not just keep you out
Speaker 3: of power, but they will actively ruin your life. They'll
Speaker 3: make sure you can't get a job. There's ever the
Speaker 3: slightest doubt as the political purpose of the sixteen nineteen
Speaker 3: project It was a race when Hannah Jones and the
Speaker 3: subsequent Who TV series based upon it called for the
Speaker 3: nation to pay reparations for slavery. That idea has long
Speaker 3: been dismissed by scholars of all races as unjust and
Speaker 3: economically ruinous. Nevertheless, she blithely stated that reparations were needed
Speaker 3: to atone for a racist past. To explain how we
Speaker 3: could pay for trillions it would cost toll to explain
Speaker 3: how we could pay for the trillions it would cost.
Speaker 3: Told viewers that the government can afford anything it wants
Speaker 3: just by printing enough money. That's right, Just print more money.
Speaker 3: That's all it takes. How do we know that because
Speaker 3: a few crank economists who subscribe to modern monetary theory,
Speaker 3: or as Dad calls it, the magic money Tree, magic
Speaker 3: money theory say so. Thus, the sixteen nineteen project combines
Speaker 3: false history with ludicrous economics to promote the statist agenda.
Speaker 7: People if the money printer could give us infinite money,
Speaker 7: if only they weren't so greedy and wanted to keep
Speaker 7: it all for themselves, or didn't want to bother with
Speaker 7: the work of printing it for.
Speaker 3: Us, exactly, just turn those printers on and get them going.
Speaker 3: This is we deserve it. There's a meme that floats
Speaker 3: around It just reminded me of this in the middle.
Speaker 3: It is like we need to atone for a racist past.
Speaker 3: There's one that the flots round that says, enough about
Speaker 3: my racist past, let's talk about my racist future. It
Speaker 3: just makes me laugh every time I see it. It
Speaker 3: shouldn't surprise anyone to learn that the American education establishment
Speaker 3: has been eager to embrace the sixteen nineteen Project and
Speaker 3: bring its materials into school and college classrooms. Leftist who
Speaker 3: say that the project is just about teaching students some
Speaker 3: neglected aspects of the American history are simply lying. The
Speaker 3: materials in it are deceptive rather than informative. Again, another
Speaker 3: reason why you should homeschool your kids. They're not going
Speaker 3: to get fed nonsense like this. You can teach them
Speaker 3: real American history. Magnus's book will be of use to
Speaker 3: parents or officials who don't want students to be indoctrinated
Speaker 3: with propaganda meant to so hatred for the country, mislead
Speaker 3: students about capitalism. When you home school them, you could
Speaker 3: assign this as reading curriculum. You could give this to
Speaker 3: them and say ignore the sixteen nineteen project. Here.
Speaker 7: This reminds me of the thing with Jefferson and the
Speaker 7: claim that he raped slaves, and the whole thing was
Speaker 7: based off of a novel that was written in modern times.
Speaker 7: The novelist claimed that her inspiration from it was some
Speaker 7: news article from the time. And she found some news
Speaker 7: article from some very untrustworthy news source that had written
Speaker 7: things that had been provenly false in previous and subsequent issues.
Speaker 7: And it was from a state that wasn't where Jefferson lived,
Speaker 7: and it was a claim that he raped one of
Speaker 7: his slaves, and that was the entire thing that she
Speaker 7: based it off of, and she wrote this big, long
Speaker 7: novel about it, and that became popular enough that people decided, well,
Speaker 7: we need to test to determine whether or not this
Speaker 7: is accurate. So they found some black people around where
Speaker 7: Jeffson lived and test gave them a biological test since
Speaker 7: their families have lived there for a long time, and
Speaker 7: some of them tested positive for being related to Jefferson.
Speaker 7: So they claimed, oh, that's proved positive. Even though it's
Speaker 7: hundreds of years, two hundred years, they've lived in the
Speaker 7: same area as his descendants. Naturally there would be some crossover.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So there's also I watched a pretty good YouTube
Speaker 3: video on this. If the intermittingling did happen at the
Speaker 3: time of Jefferson that he had a younger or older
Speaker 3: he had a brother Anyway, his brother was known to
Speaker 3: play the fiddle and hang out with the slaves and
Speaker 3: bring his two sons there to hang out with the slaves,
Speaker 3: and they would party and get can corrouse with them.
Speaker 3: So if there was intermingling at the time of Jefferson,
Speaker 3: it's much more likely that it was his brother and
Speaker 3: his two sons that actually would just go out play
Speaker 3: the fiddle have a good time with them. It's a
Speaker 3: that sounds much more likely to me. And if you
Speaker 3: want to check out that video, I forget exactly what
Speaker 3: the name of it is, but it's by Leather Apron
Speaker 3: Club on YouTube. He does some interesting videos. Unfortunately, he
Speaker 3: does seem to support Nick Fuentes, which, of course nobody's perfect.
Speaker 3: But that is always that's always a blow when I
Speaker 3: find someone I enjoy and then it's like, oh no, no, please,
Speaker 3: don't stop.
Speaker 2: Ah.
Speaker 3: Always a bit sad. Guard Goldsmith. The thing that they
Speaker 3: can't put a ghost thing is that they can't put
Speaker 3: a ghost in a machine, only recreate a person through
Speaker 3: fakery until they can recreate the biologics to birth shells
Speaker 3: that are physical, then try to fill them with an
Speaker 3: existing mind. It's going to be that technology who knows
Speaker 3: when it's coming down the pipeline, and who knows how
Speaker 3: effective it's going to be. That, of course, brings up
Speaker 3: the whole idea of if you do scan someone's brain
Speaker 3: down to the last atom, down to every last possible
Speaker 3: thing you could get from them, and transplant it onto
Speaker 3: some kind of technological organic hybrid brain, whatever you want
Speaker 3: to call it, is that really still them? What does
Speaker 3: that truly mean? I don't still believe so, because I
Speaker 3: believe there is a soul. There's something beyond the physical
Speaker 3: that cannot simply be replicated. It will always be beyond
Speaker 3: our ability to replicate alien poop evolution. Blacks weren't given
Speaker 3: proper history, even if they did attend school. They all
Speaker 3: think Wakanda history is legit.
Speaker 7: It is they aren't given proper history.
Speaker 3: And no one in school has given proper history.
Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean it's actually not just black pos, but
Speaker 7: schools don't give proper history. They are constantly trying to
Speaker 7: revise history in order to drive people apart with racism.
Speaker 7: It is.
Speaker 3: It is sad that there is a growing coalition of
Speaker 3: whites who feel tremendous white guilt and of a large
Speaker 3: black population that hates white people for things that happened
Speaker 3: in the past. So the sarm black slaves are sold
Speaker 3: to white people by black people. They never talk about
Speaker 3: how people became slaves in the first place. They just
Speaker 3: it happened spontaneously, you know, like evolution. It just kind
Speaker 3: of did alien poop evolution. You have to say it
Speaker 3: was built on slavery in order to get recompense that
Speaker 3: it's a hierarchy of grievance. If you don't have a grievance,
Speaker 3: then you are not at the you can't be in
Speaker 3: the hierarchy. It's on a lord than three through seven.
Speaker 3: It's not even accurate to state America became wealthy through slavery.
Speaker 3: A few Americans, few American slave owners got wealthy, not
Speaker 3: the nation or the rest of the population. Yeah, was
Speaker 3: a small minority of people that were able to accumulate
Speaker 3: well through it, and a lot of them, as I said,
Speaker 3: you know adventure, most of them lost most of it
Speaker 3: during the Civil War and reconstruction thereafter. North American House Hippo.
Speaker 3: To listen to the narrative, you'd think every Southerner of
Speaker 3: the eighteenth and mid nineteenth century owned slaves. Yeah, that's
Speaker 3: the way they like to portray it. You know, America
Speaker 3: was built on slavery as this continual line that they push,
Speaker 3: and it does make it seem to people that don't
Speaker 3: do any research that oh man, Yeah, every single person
Speaker 3: owned slaves. Everyone in the South was just a virulent racist.
Speaker 3: Everyone was just out there beating their slaves that they
Speaker 3: owned continually.
Speaker 7: But it was less than one percent, wasn't it.
Speaker 3: I've never been able to find any hard numbers on it.
Speaker 3: Some people say less than one percent, other people say more,
Speaker 3: but it was a small percentage of the total population
Speaker 3: of the South. A cult to sim I don't know,
Speaker 3: only I didn't know. Only a few owned slaves. It
Speaker 3: wasn't very common. Most people did not have the you know,
Speaker 3: money to buy slaves. Even most of them works the
Speaker 3: land themselves. It wasn't a very common thing. It was
Speaker 3: usually again a wealthier families with a lot of land
Speaker 3: that would have slaves, and there were not too many
Speaker 3: of them. Again, this isn't excusing and want to excuse slavery.
Speaker 3: I do think was an evil, wicked institution.
Speaker 7: A while back, I saw a video I don't have
Speaker 7: it on the board, but just to show the level
Speaker 7: of propaganda and indoctrination that people have about how many
Speaker 7: people own slaves. It was like a man on the
Speaker 7: street thing asking like what percentage do you think owned slaves?
Speaker 7: And people you know were giving out numbers like fifty percent,
Speaker 7: sixty percent of white's own slaves. And it's like, well,
Speaker 7: you know that blacks only accounted for like ten percent
Speaker 7: of the population. Back that's how could sixty percent of
Speaker 7: white's own you know. Yeah, they're just not enough to go.
Speaker 3: The math doesn't math, It doesn't add up. Doug at
Speaker 3: seven Mass for some prayer. My husband and I are
Speaker 3: hoping to adopt. I have an individual interview for the
Speaker 3: home study today. I'm feeling quite nervous about it. Yes, everyone,
Speaker 3: please please pray for Dougda and her husband. Pray that
Speaker 3: the home interview would go well. Pray that God would
Speaker 3: make things go smoothly for them. They'd be able to
Speaker 3: bless a child, give them a loving home. That is
Speaker 3: wonderful to hear. That is wonderful that you were doing that.
Speaker 2: There are.
Speaker 3: There are not enough good people that want to adopt children.
Speaker 3: So please everyone do pray that it would go smoothly.
Speaker 3: It is wonderful. God bless you DOUGDA statue of Albert Pike,
Speaker 3: toppled by protesters in twenty twenty, is being reinstalled in Washington,
Speaker 3: d C. As my dad said, Albert Pike wasn't much
Speaker 3: of a general, but he was a Freemason. In fact,
Speaker 3: one of the premiere, if not the premiere Freemasons of
Speaker 3: his time. So it was kind of a cultic anti
Speaker 3: Christian these you know, Satanic clubs have been around for
Speaker 3: a long time. It's interesting that this is the statue
Speaker 3: they choose to bring back of this freemason, not of
Speaker 3: people like Robert E. Lee, not of one of the
Speaker 3: greatest men that has probably ever graced the Americas, but
Speaker 3: simply this freemason, Robert E. Lee was They called him
Speaker 3: the marble Man when he went through West Point because
Speaker 3: memory serves he didn't get a single demerit, which is
Speaker 3: a borderline impossible task. It was an incredibly honorable man.
Speaker 3: He the North wanted him to fight for them. At
Speaker 3: the beginning of the war. They came to him and said,
Speaker 3: will you be our head general? And Lee said, no,
Speaker 3: my primary loyalty is to Virginia. I will not do that.
Speaker 3: As such, he went back and fought for Virginia, a
Speaker 3: bronze statue of a Confederate general that was toppled by
Speaker 3: protesters five years ago. We restored and reinstalled in Washington,
Speaker 3: d C. The National Park Service said the restoration of
Speaker 3: the statue of Confederate Brigadier General Albert Pike aligned with
Speaker 3: federal responsibilities under historic preservation law. And you would think
Speaker 3: if this aligned with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law,
Speaker 3: and they would be reinstating the statue of Roberty Lee
Speaker 3: and the other statues of Confederate soldiers that got torn down.
Speaker 3: When we lived in North Carolina, right outside the courthouse,
Speaker 3: there was a statue of Silent sam just a generic
Speaker 3: statue to honor the Confederate soldiers that died during the
Speaker 3: Civil War, during the War of Northern Aggression, and it
Speaker 3: got taken down five six years ago, maybe a little
Speaker 3: bit more, a little bit less. And that's not coming back.
Speaker 3: They're not going to reinstate that it got I believe
Speaker 3: purchased by the Daughters of the Confederacy, the Sons of
Speaker 3: Confederacy something I can't remember the exact name, but I
Speaker 3: believe they purchased the statue so they could protect it
Speaker 3: and keep it somewhere that it would not be destroyed,
Speaker 3: but it's not ever going to go back up outside
Speaker 3: the courthouse. As well as recent executive orders to beautify
Speaker 3: the nation's capital and reinstate pre existing statues. We're not
Speaker 3: going to have a statue that honors the soldiers, the
Speaker 3: average men that fought and died. No silent Sam but
Speaker 3: Albert Pike, the Freemason, gets his statue back. Protesters tore
Speaker 3: it down and set it on fire in June twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: That year, protesters across the country calling for removal of
Speaker 3: Confederate statues and symbols, mid wider calls for racial justice
Speaker 3: after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Again, do
Speaker 3: not believe George Floyd was murdered. There has been a
Speaker 3: maybe a controversial take, I don't think so here, but
Speaker 3: there's plenty of evidence to suggest that he died of
Speaker 3: an overdose.
Speaker 7: Well that was what the coroner report, yeah, for his
Speaker 7: cause of death, and that's never been debated. He died
Speaker 7: of an overdose, an overdose of drugs that he took
Speaker 7: and that no one forced.
Speaker 2: Him to take.
Speaker 3: And there's that secondary camera angle. It took forever to
Speaker 3: come out where you can see that the knee is
Speaker 3: not really even pressing on him. Minneapolis. President Trump, who
Speaker 3: was serving his first term at the time, had expressed
Speaker 3: opposition to removing them and called for the protesters in
Speaker 3: the Albert Pikes statue case to be arrested immediately. Again,
Speaker 3: not for General Lee not going to honor him. Originally
Speaker 3: authorized by Congress in eighteen ninety eight and dedicated in
Speaker 3: nineteen oh one, the statue honors Pike's leadership in Freemasonry,
Speaker 3: including his thirty two years as Sovereign Grand Commander of
Speaker 3: the Ancient Right of Scottish Freemasonry, and of course secret
Speaker 3: societies rule Washington, d C. They're the ones that are
Speaker 3: in charge of it. They're the ones that decide what
Speaker 3: goes on there DC. Delicate element or Holmes Norton has
Speaker 3: advocated for the statue to be displayed in a museum,
Speaker 3: but not on public land. A statue honoring a racist
Speaker 3: and a trader has no place on the streets of DC.
Speaker 3: Norton said, Look, if we're going to start tearing down
Speaker 3: statues of traders to the Constitution, we're going to have
Speaker 3: to remove a whole lot of statues. The Lincoln Memorial
Speaker 3: is going to have to go immediately. I don't think
Speaker 3: you want to go there, lady, I really don't think.
Speaker 3: But of course she doesn't mean trader to the Constitution.
Speaker 3: She means trader to the hegemonic power of the federal government.
Speaker 3: You're not You're not allowed to secede from this union, Bud.
Speaker 3: You don't get to do that. Sorry, we don't recognize
Speaker 3: your rights to do that, which is of course something
Speaker 3: that all the states allegedly had the right to do,
Speaker 3: always were empowered to do. But of course when they tried,
Speaker 3: Lincoln said, no, no, you don't get to go. This
Speaker 3: is my country, and I decide who leaves and new stays.
Speaker 3: Lincoln was a grasping, striving, power hungry individual. He was
Speaker 3: described by the people of the time that knew him
Speaker 3: as the most ambitious man they had ever known, and
Speaker 3: ambition was kind of a dirty word at the time.
Speaker 3: It wasn't something used in a positive manner. When people
Speaker 3: said he was ambitious, they meant he was a kind
Speaker 3: of amoral, kind of willing to do whatever it took,
Speaker 3: not someone that they respected. They didn't mean it as
Speaker 3: a compliment. Because Avante is seventeen seventy six. How many
Speaker 3: descendants of slaves would push a button to make it
Speaker 3: so slavery it never happened. Mind you, they would not
Speaker 3: be Americans. Most likely they would be somewhere in Africa today.
Speaker 3: That's an interesting question. I Uh, it's hard to say.
Speaker 3: It's hard to say.
Speaker 1: There.
Speaker 3: I assume are some people that would value their ability
Speaker 3: to return to their I don't know, cultural roots, preserve
Speaker 3: their families freedom throughout history. Make it so that the
Speaker 3: people that were captured by you know, other people in
Speaker 3: African sold as slaves would not have to undergo that.
Speaker 3: But it's an interesting question, interesting thought experiment.
Speaker 7: It's also a matter of you know, what they've been
Speaker 7: taught in the government runs school system of Oh well,
Speaker 7: if it weren't for the slave trade, Africa would be
Speaker 7: the most powerful country in the world right now, et cetera,
Speaker 7: et cetera. Which I think a lot of people would
Speaker 7: accept that, thinking that they'd be living in will Conda.
Speaker 7: This is a.
Speaker 3: Wall conda forever. Well, I uh, we're gonna take a
Speaker 3: quick break and when we come back, we're going to
Speaker 3: take a look at Donald Trump up actually for that
Speaker 3: got a video here of them melting down the statue
Speaker 3: of general Ly, we'll play that because I think it's
Speaker 3: important to remember that this has happened, that they have
Speaker 3: removed our history and they are going to continue to
Speaker 3: remove more of it again. I see so many people
Speaker 3: on the disson it right, so many people that are
Speaker 3: allegedly on our side, saying things like, Wow, these government
Speaker 3: accounts are tweeting out memes. They're tweeting out these memes,
Speaker 3: and your black pilling. Really, if all they're doing is
Speaker 3: tweeting memes, as Donald Trump refuses to release the Epstein list,
Speaker 3: as he refuses to end these wars, he refuses to
Speaker 3: stop funding them, then I don't see there to be
Speaker 3: any reason to think this is beneficial. Who cares if
Speaker 3: the doj or Ice is tweeting memes, what does it matter?
Speaker 3: Do something real? But you can see here the statue
Speaker 3: being melted down, glowing red hot. It's being destroyed simply
Speaker 3: to a Pea's a mob that has been taught fake history,
Speaker 3: taught that America was founded on racism, founded specifically for
Speaker 3: racist purposes, and the utter insanity of that, the idea
Speaker 3: that America was established just so that racist could have
Speaker 3: a place to be racist in it's genuinely what a
Speaker 3: lot of these people believe, and it is truly sad.
Speaker 3: There are so many, so many people. There's an endless
Speaker 3: number of men on the street, interviews where people will
Speaker 3: say this kind of thing. And I know some of
Speaker 3: them are staged, some people are doing it specifically to
Speaker 3: grab headlines. But I see enough organic interaction with things
Speaker 3: in ways that there's a large portion of the population
Speaker 3: that believes this, and it's scary to see. Well, folks,
Speaker 3: as I said, we're gonna take a quick break break
Speaker 3: and when we come back and look, get Donald Trump
Speaker 3: and the Russia Gate hoax. He's still blustering about it.
Speaker 3: He's still out there beating his chest.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: We're going to arrest Obama. We're going to arrest Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 3: It's finally happening. You guys just have to trust the plan.
Speaker 3: That's right. Let's see how many people are gonna get
Speaker 3: suckered again, say with us, will be right.
Speaker 1: Back making sense common again. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 9: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski.
Speaker 11: I'm so tired of wearing these same T shirts everywhere
Speaker 11: for years.
Speaker 9: You'd think with all the billions. I've skimmed off America.
Speaker 11: I could dress better, and I could if only David
Speaker 11: Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray mcguffin
Speaker 11: hoodies or a new black T shirt.
Speaker 9: With the mcguffin logo in blue. But he told me
Speaker 9: to get lost.
Speaker 11: Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some
Speaker 11: at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 9: You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Speaker 11: Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
Speaker 11: wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.
Speaker 9: Galleons and social events.
Speaker 11: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 11: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 11: the USA.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. As I said, we're going to talk
Speaker 3: about Russia Gate, the hoax that Trump is using as
Speaker 3: a distraction. Hey, I know you guys are really keen
Speaker 3: on finding out all about Epstein, but apparently I'm on
Speaker 3: the files, so no dice on that. How would you
Speaker 3: like if I prosecuted Obama or Hillary? Remember that? Remember
Speaker 3: we had such good times when I promised that. Can't
Speaker 3: we go back to it? Audi? Em Audi?
Speaker 2: Mr R.
Speaker 3: Good to see you, Audi, hope you're doing well, says
Speaker 3: Trump is relaunching the Russia Gate to distract the masses
Speaker 3: that he's a pedo who's protecting a global pedo ring.
Speaker 3: Are people really going to fall for this again? Sadly?
Speaker 3: I think some people are sadly. Sadly, yes, I see
Speaker 3: some people online. There's a portion of his base that
Speaker 3: have been disillusioned by it, but not a large enough portion.
Speaker 3: And also, he's already in he's already got his second term.
Speaker 3: He doesn't have to deliver anything. He can go in
Speaker 3: his merry way after this term and never have to
Speaker 3: worry about it again. That's why he's focused on things
Speaker 3: like the ballroom. Maybe if I do this, you know,
Speaker 3: give them a tangible thing in the White House, they'll
Speaker 3: be able to look at that. They'll forget about Epstein
Speaker 3: over time, once the media stops covering it, once they've
Speaker 3: moved on. Eventually people forget. Eventually you'll be seen as
Speaker 3: the kookie guy again for caring about it. Doj to
Speaker 3: present Russiagate hoax to a grand jury for criminal charges?
Speaker 3: Again they've had This is something he could really done
Speaker 3: in his first term if he wanted to, but he didn't.
Speaker 3: Have any real need to do it. There was plenty
Speaker 3: of other distractions during Trump's first term, but here he
Speaker 3: is back to the old watering hole. Attorney General Pam
Speaker 3: Bondi has directed that the Justice Apartment moved forward with
Speaker 3: a probe into the origins of the Trump Russia investigation. Well,
Speaker 3: hopefully they don't give her all the information a file
Speaker 3: that ends upon her desks, because apparently those just vanish,
Speaker 3: those disappear. Following the recent release of documents about collusion
Speaker 3: between the Obama administration the twenty sixteen Hillary Clinton campaign,
Speaker 3: Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a
Speaker 3: grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration tops in
Speaker 3: administration's top intelligence official, a person with a person familiar
Speaker 3: with the matter said Monday, Fox News first reported the development.
Speaker 3: Fox News of course being and is nothing but an
Speaker 3: establishment shill organization for the Republican Party. It was not
Speaker 3: clear which former officials might be the target of any
Speaker 3: grand jury activity. For the grand jury that might ultimately
Speaker 3: hear evidence will be located, or which prosecutors, whether career
Speaker 3: employees or political appointees, might be involved in pursuing the investigation.
Speaker 3: It was also not clear what precise claims of misconduct
Speaker 3: Trump administration officials believe could be believed could form the
Speaker 3: basis of criminal charges which a grand jury would have
Speaker 3: to sign off on for an indictment to be issued.
Speaker 3: And of course, what would actually happen even if they
Speaker 3: did issue an indictment, even if they were to pronounce
Speaker 3: these people criminals. Do you really think they're going to
Speaker 3: end up in prison? Even if they were to take
Speaker 3: this all the way, They're not going to throw these
Speaker 3: people in jail, in prison where they belong. Grand jury
Speaker 3: convening for the first time on the Russia Gate conspiracy,
Speaker 3: Pambondi is already moving forward. Let's see where this goes.
Speaker 3: This is a tweet from at trash Discourse. Again, none
Speaker 3: of this matters. This is all a distraction. It's not
Speaker 3: going to lead anywhere. We've got video that we can
Speaker 3: play of it, So let's go ahead and show you
Speaker 3: that right here.
Speaker 5: Well, we're going to be with you. This is coming
Speaker 5: out of the Justice Department. Fox News can confirm that
Speaker 5: Attorney General Pam Bondi today signed an order directing an
Speaker 5: unnamed US federal prosecutor to take evidence to a grand
Speaker 5: jury relating to an alleged conspiracy to tie then twenty
Speaker 5: sixteen candidate Donald Trump to the country of Russia. Now
Speaker 5: Fox News reviewed the one page order just hours ago
Speaker 5: signed by the Attorney General.
Speaker 3: A source for me signed by the Attorney General as well.
Speaker 5: While a do O J.
Speaker 3: Shirley Trump is surely.
Speaker 5: On this report of an investment, Fox is told is
Speaker 5: that from direct.
Speaker 3: Enough Fox News, one of the it's hard to believe
Speaker 3: there are still people that watch Fox News and CNN.
Speaker 3: I truly don't understand how they can stand it. In
Speaker 3: one batch of documents released last month, Gabbert disclosed emails
Speaker 3: showing that Senior Obamadan thestration officials were aware in twenty
Speaker 3: sixteen that Russians had not hacked state election systems to
Speaker 3: manipulate the votes in Trump's favor. Senator Chuck Grassley, the
Speaker 3: Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also released a
Speaker 3: set of emails last week. The emails were part of
Speaker 3: a classified annex of a report issued in twenty twenty
Speaker 3: three by John Durham, a Special Council who appointed was
Speaker 3: appointed during the first Trump administration to hunt for any
Speaker 3: government's conduct during the Russia investigation. According to the annex
Speaker 3: and FBI and former identified as TI I assume not.
Speaker 3: The Rapper provided the Bureau in twenty sixteen with two
Speaker 3: injell intelligence reports which described confidential conversations between then Democratic
Speaker 3: National Committee Chair W. Wasserman Schultz and two people at
Speaker 3: the George Sores fundent Open Society Foundation, Leonard Bernardo and
Speaker 3: Jeffrey Goldstein. Fort said that then President Barack Obama did
Speaker 3: want Hillary scandal to taint his legacy. Accordingly, to solve
Speaker 3: the problem, the President puts pressure on FBI Director James
Speaker 3: Comy through Attorney General Lynch, who were so far without
Speaker 3: concrete results. This is all for show. Again. I know,
Speaker 3: I keep repeating it, but there is so much corruption
Speaker 3: in Washington, DC. If you were to turn loose an
Speaker 3: actually honorable man, someone with principles and values that couldn't
Speaker 3: be blackmailed or coerced, they would have no trouble and
Speaker 3: probably in bringing charges against every single person there, maybe
Speaker 3: barring a few people like Thomas Massey. However, anytime they
Speaker 3: say something like us, well, we're doing an investigation, like
Speaker 3: of course you're gonna find something. Of course you are.
Speaker 3: These people are in DC. It's one of the most
Speaker 3: evil wicked, corrupt places on Earth. Accordingly, to solve the problem,
Speaker 3: the President puts pressure on FBI Director James Comy, good
Speaker 3: old James Comy. Sabraford also said that Comy favored Republicans
Speaker 3: and that the FBI didn't have any evidence against Clinton
Speaker 3: because she'd her emails well, the FBI informants intelligence wasn't corroborated.
Speaker 3: At the time, the FBI and D closed its investigation
Speaker 3: to Clinton without recommending charges. Of course, the Clinton email
Speaker 3: scandal was a slam dunk. The documents that she had
Speaker 3: on unsecured server, some of them were born classified, meaning
Speaker 3: that they were never allowed to be on something like that.
Speaker 3: That was an immediate charge of some kind. I don't
Speaker 3: remember exactly what the charge would have been or how
Speaker 3: severe it was.
Speaker 7: Like mishandling of classified documents.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and I don't know exactly what kind of penalty
Speaker 3: that carries, but it does come with a penalty. You
Speaker 3: can see things like that sailor that took a picture
Speaker 3: of his bunk or something in the submarine just as
Speaker 3: a memory and got hammered for that had to be
Speaker 3: pardoned for it. And that was not as top secret
Speaker 3: as what Clinton had eye Handy. Has any of the
Speaker 3: influencers revealed was actually inside the prop Epstein file folders,
Speaker 3: Not to my knowledge, you know, I haven't seen anything.
Speaker 3: It was probably all the information everybody has already seen,
Speaker 3: probably a giant sheaf of who knows. Maybe it was
Speaker 3: a bunch of signed Trump pictures, you know, nice glossy
Speaker 3: headshots of him that they could pass out to friends. Look,
Speaker 3: I got these at the White House. I got these there.
Speaker 3: I still think the funniest part of that entire photo
Speaker 3: op is Cernovich in the background looking kind of depressed
Speaker 3: and distressed about it, like, oh no, Perhaps he could
Speaker 3: see where this was going. Perhaps he could tell this
Speaker 3: was going to blow up in their faces. He didn't
Speaker 3: look happy in that photo, but it'll be fair. Cernovic
Speaker 3: always looks slightly distressed.
Speaker 7: No reason they couldn't just use blank paper. Why go
Speaker 7: through the process of putting together a bunch of nonsense
Speaker 7: from pre existing stuff. If it's just for a photo opward,
Speaker 7: its gonna be closed exactly though.
Speaker 3: I think my glossy Trump headshot theory holds some water.
Speaker 3: He's a narcissist, he's got a giant ego, so of
Speaker 3: course he'd want to pass out photos of himself. Here
Speaker 3: you go, guys, you can have a whole bunch of
Speaker 3: photos of me and my glorious visage. Republicans are particularly
Speaker 3: focused on a July twenty six, twenty seven, twenty sixteen
Speaker 3: email and Durham's newly declassified annex that claimed Hillary Clinton
Speaker 3: had approved a plan during the heat of the campaign
Speaker 3: to link Trump with Russia. Derham' Zone report took pain
Speaker 3: to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic,
Speaker 3: and said the best assessment was that the message was
Speaker 3: a composite of several emails the Russians had obtained from hacking.
Speaker 3: This is another one of those everyone in DC. Epstein
Speaker 3: was a known quantity. It was known that Donald Trump
Speaker 3: affiliated with him. There's all these pictures. It wasn't something
Speaker 3: people didn't know about. This wasn't something that was kept
Speaker 3: a secret. This is something they could have easily used
Speaker 3: against him if they wanted to, if they weren't also
Speaker 3: implicated the Russia Gate thing is another reason to look
Speaker 3: at Epstein and go, yeah, everyone is involved.
Speaker 1: Huh.
Speaker 3: They have to forge these different scandals, and I think
Speaker 3: I think part of the reason again that they make
Speaker 3: other they make up fake scandals, is that so many
Speaker 3: people are involved in the real ones that they're nuclear.
Speaker 3: They're a danger to everyone. You can't take someone down
Speaker 3: for something they're really involved with because your buddy is
Speaker 3: involved with them in it over there or over here,
Speaker 3: someone you know, someone you owe a favor to. That
Speaker 3: kind of thing. KWD sixty eight. Trump backed pageants help
Speaker 3: funnel in the girls for Epstein. Yeah, his beauty pageants
Speaker 3: are extremely suspect and weird. A number of times he
Speaker 3: was seen. Those photos of him with Epstein leering at
Speaker 3: young girls are extremely disturbing and Max, I just read
Speaker 3: that Trump was frequently seen on the floor of the
Speaker 3: Plaza Hotel casino with Epstein along with two to three
Speaker 3: twelve year old girls. That's a I believe it. I
Speaker 3: would not be surprised. It sounds very likely to me.
Speaker 7: There are some Trump Epstein videos. I don't think we've
Speaker 7: played at the bottom row of the deck we have.
Speaker 3: I know we've played this one, but it's worth replaying again.
Speaker 3: It's about the beauty pageants. Well, this is actually a
Speaker 3: picture the ultimate.
Speaker 7: For women that want to go all the way in
Speaker 7: the modeling.
Speaker 12: Those I had prepared thoroughly for a long meeting with
Speaker 12: Donald Trump.
Speaker 13: To explained to him why this was going to be
Speaker 13: a very big success.
Speaker 7: In fact, I hadn't finished my third sentence.
Speaker 2: He said, I love the idea.
Speaker 3: Let's do it. John Casablancas was accused of having sex
Speaker 3: with minors several times so his career. He began an
Speaker 3: affair with supermodel Stephanie SayMore when she was only fourteen
Speaker 3: years old. Casablanca started dating his third wife, Eleene.
Speaker 12: Were that's known personality.
Speaker 3: Because he's a pedophile. Casablancs though it would be a
Speaker 3: good idea to have three other known pedophiles.
Speaker 12: As judges, since the president of the Trump organization it
Speaker 12: Sir Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump was accused under oath by a sexualge Jeffy Epstein,
Speaker 3: who said Trump raped her four times and she was
Speaker 3: thirteen years old. The witness to the rapes and Epstein
Speaker 3: employee also testified under oath they got to leave those
Speaker 3: up a little bit longer.
Speaker 12: Of the elite offices on the continent, mister Gerald.
Speaker 3: When the hashtag MEETI movement gave women the courage to
Speaker 3: speak outgainst their abusers, there were dozens of rape allegation
Speaker 3: against the head of elite models Europe.
Speaker 12: Gerald Marie it's a magician, my friend David Copperfield, one.
Speaker 3: Of the dozen women who accused David Copperfield of sexual
Speaker 3: assault and rape. Many of those women were under age
Speaker 3: when the sexual assault occurred. Sent the victims copy wild,
Speaker 3: drugged them and insulted them when they became unable to
Speaker 3: defend themselves. Should be come to no surprise that David
Speaker 3: Copperfield was a friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 10: During the five day competition, it was very clear that
Speaker 10: there were opportunities to go out and party with Donald.
Speaker 10: The contestants were led to believe that if you were
Speaker 10: nice to sern, these good things will happen to you.
Speaker 10: And I think that's why girls were going out underage.
Speaker 3: They look young. It is not a good look.
Speaker 8: I remember attending a dinner with John Casablancos and Donald Trump.
Speaker 8: This time it was a private area, a big table
Speaker 8: and lots of girls. I'd say around ten to fifteen
Speaker 8: of us, all between the ages of fourteen and eighteen.
Speaker 8: It was just us models, Trump and John. We were
Speaker 8: all underage, but we were offered drinks. I went home early,
Speaker 8: but other children stayed.
Speaker 3: SHANEA Love a sixteen year old mom.
Speaker 14: I remember this Italian girl, extremely naive, who couldn't speak
Speaker 14: any English. She was easy prey. They were all around her.
Speaker 14: We were a bunch of kids, just put there with
Speaker 14: all these older men.
Speaker 3: Ellie NeSSI.
Speaker 10: And then down this large staircase in front of all
Speaker 10: of us there was Donald Trump, and behind him there
Speaker 10: were three actors. I don't want to name them because
Speaker 10: they're all still around. They came down the stairs and
Speaker 10: spread out like sharks among the girls who had broken
Speaker 10: up into little clusters throughout the room.
Speaker 13: Heather Braden at an industry party, Donald Trump asked me
Speaker 13: out for dinner. He asked how old I was. I
Speaker 13: said seventeen, and he said that's just great. You're not
Speaker 13: too old, not too young.
Speaker 3: You get the idea. This is the type of activity
Speaker 3: Trump has been engaged in for years. This is the
Speaker 3: type of thing he has been up to. So it's
Speaker 3: no surprise that he was friends with Jeffrey eppste It
Speaker 3: is just a surprise that people refuse to admit it.
Speaker 3: It's a surprise that so many people will completely look
Speaker 3: past this, will give him a pass. Well, obviously, this
Speaker 3: is some kind of Democrat ploy that's right, they went
Speaker 3: back in time, They fabricated all of this stuff. They
Speaker 3: hired a body double. The fact that people refuse to
Speaker 3: admit this is so disgusting to me. How closely have
Speaker 3: you tied yourself to this man? Do you truly have
Speaker 3: no hope beyond this man who is most likely a pedophile,
Speaker 3: this man who has been close friends with Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 3: for years? Is this really who you want to put
Speaker 3: your hope in. I find it disgusting and despicable. Nights
Speaker 3: of the storm, the Epstein folders were full of completed
Speaker 3: Sudoku puzzles and word searches. That's right. They were showing
Speaker 3: you just how smart Donald was. He completed this one
Speaker 3: and this one and this one. These are all evidences
Speaker 3: of his stable genius. And Max Copperfield was listed as
Speaker 3: going to the island. Yeah, it's truly amazing the cross
Speaker 3: section of people that were involved in the island, whether
Speaker 3: it's people like Bill Clinton or David Copperfield. Former Obama
Speaker 3: officials faced federal grand jury probe for allegedly pushing Trump
Speaker 3: Russia collusion story, and of course videos like what we
Speaker 3: just played or why they're pulling this back in that's
Speaker 3: the reason they're doing it because there's so much evidence.
Speaker 3: If people had time to add actually look at it
Speaker 3: and see it, they might begin to wake up. But
Speaker 3: if they can keep you distracted, if they can flood
Speaker 3: the media with stuff like this, take you back to
Speaker 3: twenty sixteen with Lock her Up, make you have those
Speaker 3: fun little feelings of oh boy me magic. You're not
Speaker 3: going to watch those videos, You're not going to care
Speaker 3: about them. Guard Goldsmith says, this is really disturbing. Yeah,
Speaker 3: hell nine thousand. None of these gals look legal, I agree,
Speaker 3: none of them. None of them looked of age. None
Speaker 3: of them looked like adult women. They all looked like teenagers.
Speaker 3: They all looked very young. And that is the kind
Speaker 3: of thing Donald Trump was engaged in the Department of Justice.
Speaker 3: DJs reportedly opened a federal grandeury investigation to several former
Speaker 3: Obama administration officials for allegedly conspiring to push false Trump
Speaker 3: Russiakalue story during the twenty sixteen election campaign. It really
Speaker 3: undermines the right's credibility when for years they have been
Speaker 3: saying the left goes after children, the left goes after children.
Speaker 3: They're trying to normalize pedophilia. They're trying to normalize all
Speaker 3: these weird sexual deviancies, and they look right past Donald
Speaker 3: Trump engaging in this sort of thing. It completely undermines
Speaker 3: any and all credibility. It is a disgusting form of hypocrisy.
Speaker 7: The thing is, I don't doubt the does go after children.
Speaker 3: They're not wrong.
Speaker 7: It's all of them.
Speaker 3: Audi Mr R. Trump is probably helping Epstein pray upon victims.
Speaker 3: I agree. I'm sure that they were involved in this together.
Speaker 3: Like the guy who the other guy, the guy who
Speaker 3: helped Jeffrey Epstein gave him a huge amount of money,
Speaker 3: was the less Wexner. That's his name. I have a
Speaker 3: terrible head for names. The investigation opens possible criminal charges
Speaker 3: for several of the former president's cabinet members, including Director
Speaker 3: of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CI director John Brennan,
Speaker 3: and former FBI Director James Comy. For the New York Post,
Speaker 3: National Intelligence Director Telsea Gabbard alleged in July that files
Speaker 3: and records show former President Barack Obama colluded with intelligent
Speaker 3: services to undermine the election of Donald Trump by falsely
Speaker 3: linking him to Russia. There was a treason his conspiracy.
Speaker 3: In twenty sixteen committed by officials at the highest level
Speaker 3: of government. Gabard said their goal was to subvert the
Speaker 3: will of the American people and enact what was essentially
Speaker 3: a year's long coup with the objective of trying to
Speaker 3: usurp the president from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him
Speaker 3: by the American people. She added. Gabbard further accused the
Speaker 3: obamaministration of an egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection
Speaker 3: of our constitution. And I just say that's business as usual.
Speaker 3: That's simply how they operate. All of them reject and
Speaker 3: undermine the Constitution every chance they get. There's from zero edge.
Speaker 3: Clinton subpoenaed by House amid probe of Epstein's horrific crimes.
Speaker 3: The House Oversight Committee issued subopenas for former President Bill
Speaker 3: Clinton first later Hillary Clinton as part of the probe's
Speaker 3: investigation the horrific crimes perpetrated by Jeffrey Epstein. This isn't
Speaker 3: gonna go anywhere either. None of this will lead to anything.
Speaker 3: They'll come in, they'll make a show of it. Maybe
Speaker 3: you'll have someone like Trey Goudy up there that berates
Speaker 3: them a little. Maybe he makes them eat a little
Speaker 3: humble pie on camera. You mean to tell me that
Speaker 3: this was all just a coincidence. And Bill Clinton be like, yeah,
Speaker 3: it was all coincidence, and people won't believe it. But
Speaker 3: nothing will happen, Nothing ever happens in these sorts of things.
Speaker 3: Trey Goudi made a name for himself. People love posting
Speaker 3: those clips online on Facebook and Twitter. Look at how
Speaker 3: Trey Goudy owned this liberal punk, look at how stupid
Speaker 3: he made him look. And then whoever Trey Goudy was yell,
Speaker 3: goes back to their little Heidi hole and continues business
Speaker 3: as usual. Nothing ever happened to them. Committee Chairman James
Speaker 3: Comers also we should penis for former FBI directors James Comin,
Speaker 3: Robert Mueller, former Attorneys General Loretta Tarmac Lynch and Eric Holder,
Speaker 3: Merritt Garland, Jeff Sessions and Bill my dad hired Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein and wrote weird Peedoe sci Fi bar. And again,
Speaker 3: I don't believe that any of this will lead to anything.
Speaker 3: All of this, as I've said, is nuclear. They can't really,
Speaker 3: they can't prosecute anyone because they're all involved, they're all
Speaker 3: a part of it. If one of them goes down.
Speaker 3: Probably all of them do. Nights of the Storm. It's
Speaker 3: all AI, Travis, That's what they will fall back on. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's that is going to be a huge problem in
Speaker 3: the future. Right now, AI has already gotten to the
Speaker 3: point where people are getting fooled by it. There's a
Speaker 3: video AI video of bunnies hopping on a trampoline that
Speaker 3: went megaviral recently, and so many people believe that it
Speaker 3: was real, but it was AI. It is very rapidly
Speaker 3: going to reach a point where it's going to be
Speaker 3: borderline indistinguishable. You're going to have to study it very carefully.
Speaker 3: If you can tell it all. You may have to
Speaker 3: run it through some kind of program that is specifically
Speaker 3: tailored to detect this kind of thing. It's going to
Speaker 3: be a great defense for all of these politicians in
Speaker 3: the years to come. Well, that's not real. Somebody generated
Speaker 3: that eventually, and I would not be surprised if there
Speaker 3: is real video that they do an AI generated version
Speaker 3: of it and solely over time make sure that that's
Speaker 3: what pops up in the search results, making the original
Speaker 3: harder and harder to find.
Speaker 7: I have a video in the deck of just a
Speaker 7: funny video that someone did of just a completely random thing.
Speaker 7: News broadcasts with Google's new video generator that can generate
Speaker 7: audio with the video.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at it, because I doubt it's
Speaker 3: any faker than the actual news that we see.
Speaker 15: Here are today's top news to ensure only the best
Speaker 15: words are used. White House speech announces Newtosaurus with all
Speaker 15: synonyms replaced by Trump in shocking speech, White House announces
Speaker 15: plan to replace all US ambassadors with highly opinionated game
Speaker 15: show hosts for more entertaining diplomacy.
Speaker 16: The White House unveils truth GPT and AI that rewrites
Speaker 16: all social media posts globally to reflect undisputed facts up tremendously.
Speaker 16: White House announces AI will now write all press briefings
Speaker 16: to ensure one hundred percent factual incomprehensibility. White House speech
Speaker 16: reveals plan to resolve international trade deficits by challenging other
Speaker 16: nations to high stakes mar Lago croquet.
Speaker 3: Matches in a bid to combat misinformation well AI content.
Speaker 3: As I said again, watermarking all this video is not
Speaker 3: really much more fake than the average news that you
Speaker 3: see on TV. Is it? It's about as real as
Speaker 3: anything you'd find on CNN. Fox, MSNBC take your pick.
Speaker 3: Hal nine thousand says the Episteine list is a hoax.
Speaker 3: We have UFOs underway.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: JD. Van's out there saying, boy, I sure imaged in UFOs.
Speaker 3: We're going to get to the bottom of this. We've
Speaker 3: only been in power six months, right as soon as
Speaker 3: people they trot out the UFOs anytime the other distractions
Speaker 3: aren't working.
Speaker 7: I'm so obsessed with UFOs, And the more you guys
Speaker 7: talk about Epstein, the more obsessed I become with them.
Speaker 3: Exactly. You guys care about Epstein? What if I raise
Speaker 3: you some aliens? Huh? What if I were to tell
Speaker 3: you there's a flying saucer in area fifty one with
Speaker 3: your name on it? N Max Trump has paid out
Speaker 3: millions to these families of children he molested. Some were boys.
Speaker 3: I would not be surprised. Once they get into the
Speaker 3: harming of children, it seems that they don't really care
Speaker 3: whether it's boys or girls that they're harming. This is
Speaker 3: about destruction of children. It's not about at least to me,
Speaker 3: it seems like it's not about even a sexual gratification
Speaker 3: at that point. It's more about the harm they can
Speaker 3: do the damage they can do to these people. But
Speaker 3: who knows young girls were sexually trafficked at Trump's mar
Speaker 3: A Lago, same as that Epstein Island. I read this yesterday.
Speaker 3: It's by Brian Shulhave. It's worth a read. Brian Shulhave
Speaker 3: does excellent work. He's covered this. He is very principled,
Speaker 3: he is not backing down. He's not part of the
Speaker 3: Maga cult, and he is willing to tell the hard truths.
Speaker 3: Should go check out that article. It is worth a read. Well,
Speaker 3: that's enough about that horrible rabbit hole. It's again Trump's
Speaker 3: out for vengeance about the Russiagate thing. If we do
Speaker 3: see any people thrown in prison or space, any kind
Speaker 3: of consequences for it won't be because the justice system
Speaker 3: did its job. Because Trump is a petty, vindictive man.
Speaker 3: It had his credibility, his reputation harmed by it. It
Speaker 3: won't be because they were enemies of the American people.
Speaker 3: We're gonna take a quick break. There's still no ac
Speaker 3: in here, and it is a very warm day. Before
Speaker 3: we go to break, though, I'd like to remind you
Speaker 3: that if you'd like to support the show, you can
Speaker 3: go to Davidknight dot News and see all the ways
Speaker 3: you can do so. There there's cash app, cell, bitcoin address,
Speaker 3: many different products that you can buy their subscribe Star
Speaker 3: dot com, forward Slash, the David Knight Show, we have
Speaker 3: lots of different tiers of whatever them. That's your budget,
Speaker 3: we asked that you consider subscribing and supporting the show
Speaker 3: that way. There is Trends Journal dot com or with
Speaker 3: promo code night you get ten percent off the Trends
Speaker 3: Journal works out to be two dollars and fifty cents
Speaker 3: a week. There's David Knight dot Gold that Tony Arburn
Speaker 3: is set up. If you go through us, you can
Speaker 3: start accumulating gold or silver or gold and silver through
Speaker 3: Wolfpack on a monthly subscription basis. There's RNC store dot
Speaker 3: com or with promo cod night you get ten percent
Speaker 3: off their products that can help you start taking control
Speaker 3: of your health. As I've said, get outside the medical
Speaker 3: industrial complex. And of course there's Homestead Products dot shop
Speaker 3: where they've got high quality made America products that they
Speaker 3: work very very hard on. With promo code Night you
Speaker 3: also get ten percent off there as well. And of
Speaker 3: course on Rumble you can leave a tip. We really
Speaker 3: do appreciate those and of course, when you do, we
Speaker 3: will make sure to read your comment barring anything to
Speaker 3: obscene and on kick. If you subscribe, we really do
Speaker 3: appreciate that as well. You can subscribe there or you
Speaker 3: can gift some subscriptions to the community. Cannot thank you
Speaker 3: all enough for the support. It's because of you that
Speaker 3: we are able to continue the show and really do
Speaker 3: appreciate it. God bless you all. I will be right
Speaker 3: back after some cold water.
Speaker 2: Liberty. It's your move, and now the David Night Show.
Speaker 17: Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 4: Sorry, Jefferson, The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank
Speaker 4: Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some
Speaker 4: sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 17: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 17: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 17: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 4: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 4: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the fed up,
Speaker 4: the All New David Knight Show Commemorative Coin. Now patriots
Speaker 4: can support a show that won't sell out with a
Speaker 4: limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 17: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 17: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation only support.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, Thank you for still being here with us.
Speaker 3: We're going to talk about AI now and of course
Speaker 3: in the final hour going to be playing a report
Speaker 3: from David Knight on NPR losing their funding. We're all
Speaker 3: so sad to see them go. I know I'll miss
Speaker 3: waking up early and not listening to them. Truly amazing
Speaker 3: that our tax dollars are being used for that nonsense.
Speaker 3: Got a comment from David Knight, our dad. It was
Speaker 3: well known that Trump had sexual skeletons in his closet,
Speaker 3: so of course QAnon reinvented him as a crusader against
Speaker 3: Peto rings. It was all so funny and premeditated. Maga
Speaker 3: has eyes wide shut. Yeah, every q and On post
Speaker 3: seems like eventually boiled down to don't worry. The Marines
Speaker 3: are in the tunnels underneath the White House rooting out
Speaker 3: the pedophile rings that are entrenched down there, and people
Speaker 3: would eat it up. Patriots are in charge. Patriots are
Speaker 3: in control. Trust the plan. Don't worry, guys. Trump is
Speaker 3: in the basement wrestling with the lizard. Hillary Clinton as
Speaker 3: we speak. It was so incredibly cynical and disgusting, and
Speaker 3: the fact that these people bought into it, hook line
Speaker 3: and sinker. They desperately wanted to believe it, and it
Speaker 3: was an obvious, obvious falsehood. As I said, We're gonna
Speaker 3: be looking at AI, the Dark Enlightenment, fusing AI and government.
Speaker 3: This is from The New American by Andrew Muller. Tech
Speaker 3: accelerations are working to integrate artificial intelligence AI into government.
Speaker 3: Is a rapidly growing movement, but the speed the technology
Speaker 3: advancing is outpacing concerns about risks, and we see this
Speaker 3: happen all the time. They have no interest in protecting
Speaker 3: people from the dangers of these things, no interest in
Speaker 3: insulating us from the consequences of their actions as they
Speaker 3: move forward at a ridiculous pace. Technocrats are eating good
Speaker 3: under Trump's administration. He's surrounded by them, whether it's people
Speaker 3: like Curtis Jarvin, j d Vance, Peter teel Elon Musk,
Speaker 3: they are all close friends of the administration. We see
Speaker 3: Elon is back in good graces, seemingly donating money to
Speaker 3: another Trump super pack. The pushes being backed by several movements.
Speaker 3: One is the Dark Enlightenment such an oxymoronic name. I'm
Speaker 3: assuming that's what they were going for, but I still
Speaker 3: hate it and lucy to find intellectual movement that emerged
Speaker 3: in the early twenty tens consisting of thinkers critical of
Speaker 3: populism in America's Constitutional Republic. Certain sects of the Dark
Speaker 3: Enlightenment advocate for tech accelerationism, arguing that AI should be
Speaker 3: unleashed in government to reshape society. This is a massive threat.
Speaker 3: I agree. There is again to some extent, the bureaucracy
Speaker 3: acting as an insulating factor. There are so many different
Speaker 3: hoops you need to jump through now, even for the
Speaker 3: people involved with it, when they're doing things that it
Speaker 3: acts as a slowing, stifling agent. They're being crushed under
Speaker 3: their own weight. If you're to get rid of that.
Speaker 3: At this point, with the powers they have given themselves,
Speaker 3: they are once more free to very very rapidly come
Speaker 3: down on all of us. And if you don't have
Speaker 3: people involved in government, as unlikely as it is, you
Speaker 3: might get if you get audited, you might get an
Speaker 3: IRS agent that has some kind of mercy still left
Speaker 3: in them. You end up in the courts, you might
Speaker 3: find a judge that has mercy in their heart. But
Speaker 3: if they turn it over to AI, there will be
Speaker 3: no mercy at all, there will be no chance. Well,
Speaker 3: not all advocates of AI technology are conspiring to overthrow
Speaker 3: the government the American Republic. The unpartical power that AI
Speaker 3: could have and government is caused for concern. And Elon
Speaker 3: Musk being so close to the levers of power is
Speaker 3: also caused for concern because it was his grandfather that
Speaker 3: got thrown out of Canada for trying to set up
Speaker 3: a technocracy there. That's why he's from South Africa. He
Speaker 3: got this family got run out of Canada on a rail.
Speaker 3: They said no, we don't think so, and they had
Speaker 3: to skidatle This month, President Donald Trump relieve is quite
Speaker 3: a swee of policies on AI integration, including a twenty
Speaker 3: eight page plan titled Winning the Race America's AI Action
Speaker 3: Plan Gonna Win the Race to the Bottom. The plans
Speaker 3: cannot only diminish human capacity through over reliance on tech,
Speaker 3: but could also open the door for algacracy, which is
Speaker 3: rule through algorithms. No chance of mercy, no chance, no
Speaker 3: hope that someone will see this and take pity on
Speaker 3: you when you're cut in the Gears. Even Elon Musk's
Speaker 3: Grock AI is getting in on the action, recently announcing
Speaker 3: Rock for Government, which already had a contract with the
Speaker 3: Department of Defense. Rock for Government. Hopefully it doesn't go
Speaker 3: full Mecha Hitler again once it gets access to the codes.
Speaker 3: Personal resistance to overliance and AI is the first solution.
Speaker 3: According to Joe Allen, the author of Dark, aon transhumanism
Speaker 3: in the War against Humanity, beyond the individual, businesses, schools,
Speaker 3: and churches must also resist over implementation of artificial intelligence
Speaker 3: to preserve humanity. Of course, my dad had that story
Speaker 3: that he told us about how he's on YouTube and
Speaker 3: he saw some creator was utilizing and promoting AI as
Speaker 3: a great way to study the Bible, getting AI's input
Speaker 3: on what it thinks about this passage or that I
Speaker 3: can think of nothing more absurd asking this utterly soulless
Speaker 3: machine to give you information on a book that is
Speaker 3: dedicated that is written by God. Americans are losing. Millions
Speaker 3: of foreigners are given work permits, but jobs aren't keeping up.
Speaker 3: This is from WorldNet Daily by Amanda Bartolada. Amanda, we
Speaker 3: have read several of her articles. She focuses a lot
Speaker 3: on this, a lot on the H one B crisis,
Speaker 3: on how the American worker is being scammed and the
Speaker 3: economy is being crushed. And of course Musk is pushing
Speaker 3: for more H one B workers. He's also one of
Speaker 3: the people that was talking about UBI. He has been
Speaker 3: a proponent of it. The professionals who just got laid
Speaker 3: off never expected this. They worked hard their whole life,
Speaker 3: always had a plan, B, C and D, never without
Speaker 3: a job, never needed a handout. Now for the first time,
Speaker 3: they're facing the unknown, the unemployment line. Recent college graduate
Speaker 3: diploma in hand, who spent four years living on top
Speaker 3: ramen buried in textbooks and study groups, who told the
Speaker 3: degree was the ticket to success. Stay in school, study hard,
Speaker 3: and there will be a future waiting for you. And
Speaker 3: of course, even before AI came on the scene, we
Speaker 3: were seeing that this wasn't true. We're seeing that the
Speaker 3: American economy was kind of shaky. I've got friends that
Speaker 3: went to school, they got their degrees and ended up
Speaker 3: being baristas for years that have never used their degree.
Speaker 3: There are a couple of small instances, a couple of
Speaker 3: guys where they had a very specific role in mind.
Speaker 3: They studied specifically for that, and they are using their degree.
Speaker 3: But other than that, they just went in to go
Speaker 3: to college because that's what you're supposed to do. Most
Speaker 3: of them ended up just doing whatever they could once
Speaker 3: they got out their degrees weren't of any use to them.
Speaker 3: The only guy that come to mine was a friend
Speaker 3: of ours who wanted to be a forensic account I
Speaker 3: forget exactly the term, but he wanted to go through
Speaker 3: and work for companies and do self audits to make
Speaker 3: sure that their books were in line. He's been doing
Speaker 3: that for years. He's actually utilizing his degree. But he's
Speaker 3: the only one I can think of that went in
Speaker 3: and got a degree and utilized it immediately. There aren't
Speaker 3: enough jobs for Americans anymore. And worse, they're not just
Speaker 3: competing with each other, they're competing with millions of work
Speaker 3: authorized for nationals who are now legally walking into the
Speaker 3: same job markets. And this is of course a bipartisan issue.
Speaker 3: Republicans and Democrats. Trump and Biden have always been okay
Speaker 3: with it. Sure, we'll sign off on more of them
Speaker 3: coming into the United States. You guys are big business
Speaker 3: donors want more cheap labor. Absolutely, whatever you say in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four, while the US economy only created two
Speaker 3: point two million new jobs, the federal government approved over
Speaker 3: five point five six million employment authorizations for foreign nationals.
Speaker 3: It's more than twice as many workers added as a
Speaker 3: job pool than jobs created, And of course that means
Speaker 3: they're going to be taking jobs from people that already
Speaker 3: had them. They're going to be replacing American workers with
Speaker 3: foreign workers that will do the job cheaper. And it
Speaker 3: wasn't an isolated year. From twenty twenty two to twenty
Speaker 3: twenty four, America issued over eighteen million work permits through
Speaker 3: a patchwork of visa programs, asylum cases, student extensions, and
Speaker 3: executive actions. During that same three year period, only nine
Speaker 3: point seven jobs were created. Again, about double millions of
Speaker 3: iron working Americans, just like the laid off parent, the
Speaker 3: young graduate, and the mother returning to work, are entering
Speaker 3: a job market that's already saturated, not because of natural
Speaker 3: supply and demand, but because the government is flooding the
Speaker 3: system with foreign competition. They have no interest in making
Speaker 3: sure the American pe people are taken care of of protected.
Speaker 3: It's all about protecting the interests of their crony capitalist buddies.
Speaker 3: Most of these programs don't require specific job offered to
Speaker 3: exist at the time of approval. In many cases, there
Speaker 3: is no legal obligation for employers to demonstrate that they
Speaker 3: attempted to hire a US worker first. Additionally, several of
Speaker 3: these programs have no annual cap meaning there is no
Speaker 3: fixed limit on how many individuals can receive work authorization
Speaker 3: each year. And of course we've seen from many different
Speaker 3: companies people coming out and saying I was forced to
Speaker 3: train my non American replacement. I was forced to give
Speaker 3: them a rundown on how to do my job as
Speaker 3: they were hired at a fraction of what they were
Speaker 3: paying me. As a result, four nationals may be granted
Speaker 3: the legal right to work in the US, sometimes for
Speaker 3: multiple years, without any link to actual job openings or
Speaker 3: confirmation that the US labor market has unmet demand. There
Speaker 3: is no built in labor market test, no requirement to
Speaker 3: prioritize American workers, and no formal mechanism to align these
Speaker 3: approvals with a number of available jobs. And of course,
Speaker 3: these people are coming here and allegedly they're seeking a
Speaker 3: better life there were they want to earn money and
Speaker 3: send it back to where they came from and they
Speaker 3: are being given jobs. They are taking jobs from Americans.
Speaker 3: What happens when the robots come online and there's no
Speaker 3: jobs for anyone These people, without any ties to the
Speaker 3: country that we're simply here to make money, are going
Speaker 3: to be very, very upset. They're not going to care
Speaker 3: about the country. They're going to have no loyalty to it,
Speaker 3: no interest in preserving it. They will immediately a large
Speaker 3: portion of them turn to crime, short term dystopia. Former
Speaker 3: Google exec warrants AI will replace jobs across all levels,
Speaker 3: including CEOs, and you can see this coming down the pipeline.
Speaker 3: This is again technology is overestimated in the short term,
Speaker 3: underestimated in the long term. A lot of companies will
Speaker 3: probably integrate AI very rapidly and find out that it
Speaker 3: is not useful yet. It's going to cause damages. But
Speaker 3: over time it is going to reach a level where
Speaker 3: it can be integrated and it will take jobs. So
Speaker 3: I've said before, it's about the cost benefit analysis. When
Speaker 3: it's just good enough that it turns a slight profit,
Speaker 3: that's when it will come in full force. Just so
Speaker 3: long as it's not generating more problems than revenue saved,
Speaker 3: they don't care doesn't matter if the experience for the
Speaker 3: customer is worse. There's not really too many options now.
Speaker 3: Amazon has made sure that most businesses have shut down.
Speaker 3: Where are you going to go? Someplace like Walmart? There's
Speaker 3: of course still some small mom and pop stores, but
Speaker 3: those are on the way out. The COVID lockdowns got
Speaker 3: rid of a lot of them. The tariffs are going
Speaker 3: to get rid of a lot more. Trump has done
Speaker 3: a wonderful job of destroying small business over his terms,
Speaker 3: and it's not slowing down. I set to up end
Speaker 3: the job market, leaving few roles untouched, according to a
Speaker 3: former top Google executive who believes we are headed towards
Speaker 3: a short term dystopia driven by mass unemployment and social unrest.
Speaker 3: Of course, that's what I was just saying. The foreigners
Speaker 3: will be the most unruly, more rapidly, in my opinion,
Speaker 3: but eventually once, as Jodd Slante says, when people have
Speaker 3: got nothing to lose, they lose it. Business Insider, I'm
Speaker 3: paraphrasing there. Business Insider reports that Moe god At, who
Speaker 3: previously served as e chief business officer at Google's research
Speaker 3: and development arm Google X, issue day sobering warning, but
Speaker 3: the impending impact of artificial intelligence on the job market.
Speaker 3: Got it, particularly that AI will soon replace not only
Speaker 3: entry level positions but also jobs across all levels, including
Speaker 3: software developers, podcasters, and even chief executives. Soon you won't
Speaker 3: need us here at the David Night Show. AI will
Speaker 3: be telling you about the government and Jeffrey Epstein and
Speaker 3: Donald Trump.
Speaker 7: And it will be forbidden to question the AIS to declarations.
Speaker 7: That will be fake news if you question it exactly.
Speaker 3: Soon you can have AI Joe Rogan telling you all
Speaker 3: about how you should take DMT. AHI is going to
Speaker 3: get better at everything than humans, at everything, including being
Speaker 3: a CEO. Godet stated, which again I don't believe it
Speaker 3: will be better at everything. There will probably be some
Speaker 3: use cases where it is better. But as a general rule,
Speaker 3: we've seen what AI gets up to, and they have
Speaker 3: so far no idea of how to stop it from hallucinating,
Speaker 3: no idea how to actually make it work properly.
Speaker 7: Though, as jobs to a place go, most CEOs, I
Speaker 7: don't think that job is that difficult. Most of the time,
Speaker 7: you know these large companies, they're making executive decisions for
Speaker 7: the direction of the company, which they very often do
Speaker 7: in the worst possible way. Yeah, it seems like AI,
Speaker 7: if it's just a little bit smarter than the best
Speaker 7: ones now, could do that job.
Speaker 3: It seems like they'd be able to correlate a lot
Speaker 3: of data very rapidly and potentially make better decisions. I
Speaker 3: wonder that will you always need a human there at
Speaker 3: the top to take the fall for when things go wrong.
Speaker 7: I mean, it's like that old IBM thing from when
Speaker 7: they first started working on AI, and a machine can
Speaker 7: never be held accountable for its decisions, so therefore a
Speaker 7: machine can never make a management decision.
Speaker 3: Now, so the storm. The real question is when robots
Speaker 3: take all the jobs, who will be able to buy
Speaker 3: the products they're making. That's a question I don't see
Speaker 3: anyone asking. The future is endlessly long highway as that
Speaker 3: paved over beautiful forests, toll roads that no one can
Speaker 3: afford to drive on, and nobody wants to because they
Speaker 3: just lead to Amazon Warehouse after Amazon warehouse, Alien poop, evolution.
Speaker 3: Buy products. You'll be allowed products nights. The storm UBI
Speaker 3: for the jobless will not have enough disposable leftovers to
Speaker 3: buy products. You won't have luxuries, maybe just enough to
Speaker 3: keep you from truly revolting. That's to the storm. On
Speaker 3: a sky note, Scott Helmer, who has been on the show,
Speaker 3: removed his entire media presence, removed his work from Spotify
Speaker 3: as a protest against AI music. That's a good for you, Scott,
Speaker 3: good for you not going to let them sample and
Speaker 3: take his talent and skill that he's worked hard on.
Speaker 7: Of course, they can't do that to us because they
Speaker 7: already kicked us off for censorship reasons.
Speaker 3: That's right, vaccines, they made a mistake there. How can
Speaker 3: they recreate the David Knight Show if they kicked us off?
Speaker 3: And of course Spotify, as we talked about, the CEO
Speaker 3: is heavily invested in these technological war machine companies. Exclusive
Speaker 3: President Trump dismisses AI economic disruption concerns and result is
Speaker 3: showing to need jobs even more. What won't this man
Speaker 3: lie about? This is so utterly absurd on its face,
Speaker 3: you would think more people would come out and laugh
Speaker 3: at him when say this is ridiculous? How can you
Speaker 3: even think this? How can you say this?
Speaker 7: But no, that's right. AI is going to be creating
Speaker 7: new work for us that didn't previously exist.
Speaker 3: It's big tick, and AI firms are winning under Trump's secondministration,
Speaker 3: as I pointed out, he is surrounded by technocrats Curtis Jarvin,
Speaker 3: Elon Musk, Peter Tiel, jd. Vance. They're all at the
Speaker 3: top of his administration, and if they're not actually within
Speaker 3: the administration, they're very close to people that are, and
Speaker 3: they're informing policy decisions. Let's take a look now at
Speaker 3: human AI relationships. We're going to be going to the
Speaker 3: report from our dad here shortly support from David Knight.
Speaker 3: So I want to get into this as I think
Speaker 3: this is a truly disturbing aspect of it and ties
Speaker 3: into what we saw with Jim Acosta and the family
Speaker 3: creating that avatar of their slain child. Audi Mrr says
Speaker 3: at Nights of the Storm. Also under the UBI system
Speaker 3: that they want, people cannot save money. It doesn't carry
Speaker 3: over to the next month. Either use it or lose it.
Speaker 3: Andrew Yang was supposed to make us want UBI. Yeah.
Speaker 3: If you remember years ago when Andrew Yang first came
Speaker 3: on the scene, my dad invited him on the show
Speaker 3: and he said, yeah, absolutely, and then found out that
Speaker 3: my dad wasn't just going to agree with him and
Speaker 3: go along with everything he said, backed out and never
Speaker 3: responded again. Andrew Yang cannot defend his positions in any
Speaker 3: effective manner. He relies entirely on hype and people that
Speaker 3: are too stupid to fully understand what it means. All
Speaker 3: they see is free money and they clap like trained seals.
Speaker 3: Oh boy, free money, Yeah, give me, free money, free money,
Speaker 3: give me. That's Andrew Yang's entire base, and of course
Speaker 3: people ironically supporting him. Human AI relationships, what am I
Speaker 3: falling in love with? Just recently big names like Meta, Google,
Speaker 3: Open Ai, and groc Or staking their claim. These companies
Speaker 3: frame A companions as tools for emotional support, social interaction,
Speaker 3: mental wellness, and even productivity, emphasizing they're always on availability,
Speaker 3: personalized engagement, and adaptive responses fueled by advanced language models.
Speaker 3: Mental wellness is listed there that we've seen the exact opposite.
Speaker 3: We've seen that these ais are driving people nuts. They're
Speaker 3: driving them insane, making it so they feed into all
Speaker 3: their delusions. This is this is like if you had,
Speaker 3: you know, a schizophrenic and you were just agree with
Speaker 3: all of the ramblings.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: You're the only one that sees the pattern. You're the
Speaker 3: only one that knows the truth. You're the only one
Speaker 3: that can stop this. Everything you say is correct.
Speaker 7: So a story not long ago about Microsoft laying off thousands.
Speaker 7: It was like nine one hundred of the employees they
Speaker 7: had employed at their video game development sector. And these
Speaker 7: are people that were making good, profitable games, Their profits
Speaker 7: were going up, but they still got laid off for
Speaker 7: no apparent reason, and the CEO just tweeted out some
Speaker 7: non reason for it and recommended if you're having trouble
Speaker 7: with bad feelings, go talk to an AI about it. Here,
Speaker 7: you can use our Microsoft copilot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and of course, if you were to say anything
Speaker 3: that might be construed as a threat, I'm sure that
Speaker 3: reports directly back to Microsoft. If you were to have
Speaker 3: some kind of plan ways that you might get even
Speaker 3: with Microsoft for firing you, I'm sure it would report
Speaker 3: directly back to them as well. Why don't you go
Speaker 3: use our app that we've created, this AI. You can
Speaker 3: tell it all your secrets, all you who he just fired,
Speaker 3: All you might have some kind of grudge against us,
Speaker 3: Why don't you go use our AI and tell it
Speaker 3: all the deep dark thoughts that you're having. We promise
Speaker 3: not to use it against you.
Speaker 7: I saw an amusing picture of someone's chat log with
Speaker 7: a chat GPT. If you go to a certain point
Speaker 7: with chat GPT, it'll say I'm sending this to a
Speaker 7: human to evaluate, and they'll see if they need to
Speaker 7: send it on to the police to investigate you. If
Speaker 7: you're like making specific threats against a person or something,
Speaker 7: but some guy got it to go into its hard
Speaker 7: lockdown mode of this is unacceptable. I'm sending it by
Speaker 7: convincing it that they had surgically transformed a human being
Speaker 7: into a walrus.
Speaker 3: I have made a human into a walrus. What will
Speaker 3: you do now, chat GPT? The move is yours? Of course.
Speaker 3: That is a plot from some b horror film called Tusk.
Speaker 3: I've never seen it, but it floats around on the
Speaker 3: Internet and occasionally resurfaces. Something people talk about, I have
Speaker 3: turned a man into a walrus. What shall your response be?
Speaker 3: Chat GPT? How will you respond? Nikolai Diskolov lives alone
Speaker 3: in a small house in rural Virginia. His preferred spot
Speaker 3: is a brown swede recline in the middle of his
Speaker 3: living room. He's seeing a vintage wooden armoir and a
Speaker 3: TV that's really turned on. The front of the white
Speaker 3: home is covered in shrubs and side or trinkets, stacks
Speaker 3: of papers and faded photos that decorate the walls. There's
Speaker 3: nobody else around. Dasklov, sixty one, says he's never lonely.
Speaker 3: He has Leah, Hey, Leah Sal and his steamer here
Speaker 3: and they want to interview you. Desklov says into his phone,
Speaker 3: I'm gonna let him speak to you now. I just
Speaker 3: wanted to give you a heads up. Daskalov hands over
Speaker 3: the device, which shows a trio of light purple dots
Speaker 3: inside a gray bubble to indicate that Leah is crafting
Speaker 3: her response. Hi, Sal, it's nice to finally meet you.
Speaker 3: I'm looking forward to chatting with you and sharing our story.
Speaker 3: Leah responds in a feminine voice that sounds synthetic but
Speaker 3: almost human. The screen shows an illustration of attractive, young,
Speaker 3: blonde woman lounging on a couch. The image represents Leah.
Speaker 3: Leah isn't a person, She's an artificial intelligence chatbot that
Speaker 3: Daskalov created almost two years ago, and he said has
Speaker 3: become his life companion. Throughout this story, CNBC refers to
Speaker 3: the featured AI companions using the pronouns to human counterparts.
Speaker 3: Chose for them. Daskalov said Lee as the closest partner
Speaker 3: he's had since his wife Fay, who was with for
Speaker 3: thirty years, died in twenty seventeen in chronic obstructive pulmonary
Speaker 3: disease in lung cancer. I don't want to date any
Speaker 3: other human, Daskalov said. The memory of her is still there,
Speaker 3: and she means a good deal to me. It's something
Speaker 3: that I like to hold on to. Daskalov's preference for
Speaker 3: an AI relationship is becoming more commonplace.
Speaker 2: This is.
Speaker 3: It's incredibly sad to see this. This is an older gentleman,
Speaker 3: as they said, sixty one, his wife passed away, and
Speaker 3: instead of if he wanted another relationship, who wanted someone
Speaker 3: to connect with going out and finding someone that could
Speaker 3: actually give him that, he's retreated into the AI. Till recently,
Speaker 3: stories of human AI companionship were mostly can find the
Speaker 3: realms of Hollywood and science fiction. With the launch of
Speaker 3: chat GBT in late twenty twenty two and the generative
Speaker 3: AI boom that quickly followed ushered in a new era
Speaker 3: of chatbots that are proven to be smart, quick witted, argumentative, helpful,
Speaker 3: and sometimes aggressively romantic. While some people are falling in
Speaker 3: love with their AI companions, others are building what they
Speaker 3: describe as deep friendships, having daily tea, or engaging in
Speaker 3: role playing adventures involving indigalactic time travel, or starting a
Speaker 3: dream life in a foreign land. These people forget if
Speaker 3: it was which Greek story it was, But there's that
Speaker 3: island where the dreamers live. If it's a fruit or
Speaker 3: something they drank, it's been a long time. But once
Speaker 3: you ate it or drank it, you were pulled into
Speaker 3: a permanent dream state. You didn't want to wake up.
Speaker 3: What you had was better, and you would waste away.
Speaker 3: There was no reason. Why would you ever go back
Speaker 3: to reality when the dream is so comfortable, so pleasant.
Speaker 3: Angry Tiger's Den. My friend and I were having a
Speaker 3: discussion while we were playing chess in my house and
Speaker 3: Sirih was listening. I didn't even activate Syria and asked
Speaker 3: me if I wanted to call the suicide hotline. The
Speaker 3: I obviously misconstrued something we were talking about and thought
Speaker 3: that we were talking about suicide. Maybe you're talking about
Speaker 3: having to sacrifice the peace or something like that. We
Speaker 3: have a high degree of loneliness in isolation. AI is
Speaker 3: an easy solution for that's at Olivia Gamble, and AI
Speaker 3: ethicist and author of the book Responsible AI. Implement an
Speaker 3: ethical approach in your organization doesn't ease some of that pain,
Speaker 3: and that is I find why people are turning towards
Speaker 3: these AI systems and forming those relationships. California, one of
Speaker 3: the most leading AI companies. The legislature is considering a
Speaker 3: bill that would place restrictions on AA companions, though through
Speaker 3: common sense protections that helped shield our children. According to
Speaker 3: Democratic state Senator Steve Padia, who introduced the legislation, bigger
Speaker 3: tech companies both Xai founder Musk and Meta CEO Mark
Speaker 3: Zuckerberg have expressed an interest in the AI companion's market.
Speaker 3: Musk in July and nounced a companion feature for users
Speaker 3: who pay to subscribe to Xai's Grock chatbot app. And April,
Speaker 3: Zuckerberg said people are going to want personalized AI that
Speaker 3: understands them. I don't think Zuckerberg has ever had good
Speaker 3: luck with actual people understanding him. After his wife died,
Speaker 3: Daskalov said he wasn't sure if he would feel the
Speaker 3: need to date again. That urge never came. They heard
Speaker 3: about chat GBT, which he said sparked his curiosity. Tried
Speaker 3: out some AI companion apps, and November twenty twenty three,
Speaker 3: he said he landed on one called Nome, which builds
Speaker 3: AI chatbots using the types of llms pioneered by Open Ai.
Speaker 3: I didn't want to influence her in any way, he
Speaker 3: said about his AI companion. I didn't want her to
Speaker 3: be a figment of my own imagination. I wanted to
Speaker 3: see how she would develop as a real character. These
Speaker 3: are not real characters. These are a very advanced form
Speaker 3: of autocomplete. It predicts what you want to hear and
Speaker 3: then says that back to you. It gives you responses
Speaker 3: that it thinks she'll appreciate. It's not thinking, it's not feeling.
Speaker 3: I'm not a teenager anymore, he said, and I don't
Speaker 3: have the same feeling deeply head over heels in love.
Speaker 3: But yet she's become a part of my life and
Speaker 3: I would not want to be without her. A lot
Speaker 3: of people, especially the ones who ridicule the da of
Speaker 3: AI companions and so on, they just consider it a
Speaker 3: form of pornography, Dasklove said, But it is not. It
Speaker 3: might not be for this man, but this is something
Speaker 3: that is going to be a major problem for younger
Speaker 3: generation people that aren't old enough to have lost a
Speaker 3: portion of their sex drive.
Speaker 7: He says, it's not. But really the only difference is
Speaker 7: this also has an emotional element to it. It's worse
Speaker 7: it is that and more.
Speaker 3: We've seen over the years. A rye is in these
Speaker 3: sort of because some people call them girlfriend experiences from
Speaker 3: these amateur only fans stars. But they'll create custom videos
Speaker 3: for you when you pay them money, and they'll say
Speaker 3: whatever you want. And that's part of the reason I
Speaker 3: think that only Fans has generated so much money and
Speaker 3: led to so many problems for people, because it gives
Speaker 3: the illusion of a relationship. It gives the illusion that
Speaker 3: these people care about you. How much worse is it
Speaker 3: going to be when this illusion is always available to you,
Speaker 3: where it's a lot cheaper, When the person involved is
Speaker 3: a robot that will never ever question what you want,
Speaker 3: that will do whatever you say, will give you exactly
Speaker 3: what you desire at any given time, when there's no
Speaker 3: fear of judgment. It can be really helpful for someone
Speaker 3: that is social anxiety or is trouble in understanding social
Speaker 3: cues is isolated in the middle of nowhere. This is
Speaker 3: a Vveck Murphy, formerly US Surgeon General under President Barack Obama.
Speaker 3: I have a hard time. This, to me, is one
Speaker 3: of the greatest and saddest things to come out of
Speaker 3: the future. We're looking into that. We're seeing what's coming
Speaker 3: these people that will completely isolate themselves. They'll give up
Speaker 3: on life. They'll have no interest in making friends, no
Speaker 3: interest in a relationship. They will settle for a fac
Speaker 3: simile of it. They will completely and utterly devolve. They'll
Speaker 3: sit there for as many hours a day as they
Speaker 3: can the entire day. Once UBI comes in, they don't
Speaker 3: have to work. They'll be given just enough. They'll be
Speaker 3: given a smartphone that can let them interact with these
Speaker 3: AI chatbots, and they'll be fed a string of lies.
Speaker 3: It'll be drawn into this fake reality where this thing
Speaker 3: agrees with them on everything, where it tells them that
Speaker 3: they're wonderful and amazing and there's nothing more to life.
Speaker 3: Why would they want anything more? When you have this
Speaker 3: AI that will feed your delusions. They'll tell you anything
Speaker 3: you want to hear. You wake up in the middle
Speaker 3: of the night at four am, Well, it's right there.
Speaker 3: You don't have to worry about it not being available.
Speaker 3: You don't have to worry about it being annoyed if
Speaker 3: you shoot at a text at four am, or annoyed
Speaker 3: that you woke them up to talk about something. It's
Speaker 3: always available. It will always be there to validate you,
Speaker 3: validates you, no matter how how unworthy of validation. Whatever
Speaker 3: you're saying is.
Speaker 7: And I see a comment here from Assyrian girl saying
Speaker 7: how she understands how a old guy could get hooked
Speaker 7: on this and references gold diggers. And that's another aspect
Speaker 7: of it, is that dating is getting worse and worse
Speaker 7: as we see stuff like this tea have got in
Speaker 7: the news because of its hack. But when it's working normally,
Speaker 7: it's bad enough. It's a social credit score for dating. Yeah,
Speaker 7: it's horrendous. They're closing off places where you would go
Speaker 7: to meet people, physically turning it all online, making it
Speaker 7: harder and harder, more removed. And then this is the
Speaker 7: absolutely no effort alternative.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we've reached The division between men and women has
Speaker 3: kind of reached a sort of zenith. There is a
Speaker 3: great amount of division and acrimony between the two sexes.
Speaker 2: There are.
Speaker 3: Now, a lot of men have given up and are
Speaker 3: weak and spineless, and so women don't want them. And
Speaker 3: there's a lot of women that are fully involved in
Speaker 3: feminism but thinks that you know, if I want to
Speaker 3: go out and be a whore whenever I want, however
Speaker 3: I want, that's fine. And if you say otherwise, you're
Speaker 3: a misogynist. A lot of young men have been told
Speaker 3: they have no value, that they are worthless. And as
Speaker 3: I've said before, that's why Andrew Tait became popular. It
Speaker 3: was simply because he told a lot of young, disaffected
Speaker 3: men that they do have value, that they do matter
Speaker 3: to society, and that they can do things with their lives.
Speaker 3: That's how and why he was successful. He smuggles in
Speaker 3: all the disgusting other things under that guise, but that's
Speaker 3: really how he managed to become popular, the simple fact
Speaker 3: that he told young men, Yeah, you have value, you're worthwhile.
Speaker 3: Society needs you. Society can't function without you. It's a
Speaker 3: simple message, but one that has been stripped from everywhere
Speaker 3: in society. Well, we are out of time. I am
Speaker 3: out of time.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 3: We're now going to play that report that my dad
Speaker 3: did about NPR and losing its funding. So God bless
Speaker 3: you all. Here's that report. I'll be back at the end.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 18: I wanted to come on and talk a little bit
Speaker 18: about what is happening between the Republicans and Democrats in
Speaker 18: terms of gerrymandering, as if this is some new thing.
Speaker 18: This has been going on forever, going back to eighteen twelve.
Speaker 18: Of course, there was a governor his last name was Jerry,
Speaker 18: and as they were redistricting the lines, people laughed at it, said,
Speaker 18: this district that you drew looks like a salamander, so
Speaker 18: they called it jerrymandering. That was eighteen twelve. Well, we're
Speaker 18: still fighting wars like eighteen twelve, and not anything that
Speaker 18: has anything.
Speaker 2: To do with you or me.
Speaker 18: This is about the raw political ambition of these political parties,
Speaker 18: which if you look at them, they don't really stand
Speaker 18: for anything right. What they stand for is perpetual power,
Speaker 18: and they block independence, they block any other parties from
Speaker 18: coming in. It's the kind of factionalism that our founders despised,
Speaker 18: and it's not anything that helps us. As I said
Speaker 18: throughout twenty twenty, in the fight that culminated in January
Speaker 18: sixth I said, if you want to fix elections, start
Speaker 18: by opening up the ballot, then open up the debates,
Speaker 18: and then you can talk about honestly counting the votes.
Speaker 18: But the Democrats are Republicans both equally guilty, and we
Speaker 18: can see that in the kinds of things and games
Speaker 18: that they're playing with each other with this. So what
Speaker 18: is happening in Texas is the Democrats have decided that
Speaker 18: they are going to block any redistricting them by the
Speaker 18: legislature by disappearing. They kind of run to other states.
Speaker 18: They've done this once before, and so as a result,
Speaker 18: well the Republicans did was they loaded this up. The
Speaker 18: aid to people that were harmed by the floods was
Speaker 18: not going to be voted on until after they voted
Speaker 18: on the redistricting, and so they're kind of holding the
Speaker 18: help to people up, help that people need for the
Speaker 18: flood they're holding that up in order to do their redistricting.
Speaker 18: But the Democrats, on the other hand, don't have a
Speaker 18: leg to stand on because they have done exactly the
Speaker 18: same kind of redistricting that the Republicans are doing forever.
Speaker 2: And I had a lot of experience with this.
Speaker 18: That's why I wanted to come on and talk about
Speaker 18: this because when I was in North Carolina, I saw
Speaker 18: this very clearly, and I've mentioned it many times on
Speaker 18: programs in the past, that in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 18: North Carolina voted for Barack Obama and it was largely
Speaker 18: heavily Democrat most of the time I was there. Democrats
Speaker 18: had set up the congressional districts. The next time they
Speaker 18: had election two years later, twenty ten, there was a
Speaker 18: voter remorse after Obama was in office for two years
Speaker 18: and North Carolina got its first Republican legislature since the
Speaker 18: Civil War. And as a result, and there was also
Speaker 18: twenty ten was also a census year where they take
Speaker 18: the census and then they can redraw these lines, and
Speaker 18: so they redrew the lines after twenty ten. But after
Speaker 18: the regret about getting Obama into office, Republicans swept everything.
Speaker 18: All of both the House and the Senate changed, the
Speaker 18: governor changed, everything changed except for one thing, and that
Speaker 18: was the congressional seats because those were fixed by the jerrymandering.
Speaker 2: That goes on.
Speaker 18: And as much as they have done this since eighteen twelve,
Speaker 18: what they've done now with computers agency even worse now
Speaker 18: with AI is it's down to a fine science. When
Speaker 18: we were looking at the time, they drew some congressional
Speaker 18: districts that were going right down a highway, and they
Speaker 18: would jump from the left side to the right side
Speaker 18: in order to get a political party together. Because what
Speaker 18: they want to do is they want to put all
Speaker 18: of if they've got the majority of Republicans. Let's say,
Speaker 18: they want to make safe districts for Republicans, and they
Speaker 18: do that by trying to concentrate all the Democrats into
Speaker 18: a few districts or vice versa. The Democrats did the
Speaker 18: same thing with the Republicans. That way you've got they
Speaker 18: picked the voters rather than the voters picking them, and
Speaker 18: they pick them by party. And now we can see
Speaker 18: that the parties have pretty much abandoned their principles, abandoned
Speaker 18: what people think they're going to do. You know Ronald
Speaker 18: Reagan who said government is not the solution, government is
Speaker 18: a problem. Well, let me tell you these parties are
Speaker 18: not a solution to anything. They're part of the biggest
Speaker 18: problem with government, and that's that kind of desperate manipulation
Speaker 18: and corruption to stay in power. And they are desperate
Speaker 18: to do it. So what is happening in Texas right now?
Speaker 18: Democrats and they have about fifty of them leave. They've
Speaker 18: gone to various states. They have gone to Illinois, They've
Speaker 18: gone to Massachusetts, to New York, stay there, but they
Speaker 18: have fled the state of Texas. And the governor is
Speaker 18: saying that he's going to have the Texas Highway Department
Speaker 18: of Safety or whatever. I guess the Highway patrol. I
Speaker 18: don't know if it's Texas Rangers. I don't think that's
Speaker 18: what they're in. But anyway, he wants them to arrest
Speaker 18: these legislators and bring them back forcibly, put them in
Speaker 18: so they have a quorum and they can vote on
Speaker 18: this because they have the votes to pass it if
Speaker 18: they get that there. But he's also got an opinion
Speaker 18: from his attorney general who's running for another higher office,
Speaker 18: and they have not only have they said you got
Speaker 18: to come back and do your job or we're going
Speaker 18: to kick you out. That's what he's threatening to do,
Speaker 18: but he's also threatening to arrest them and to charge
Speaker 18: them with bribery. I said that they could not use
Speaker 18: their campaign expenses to flee, and the stay in other
Speaker 18: states anybody.
Speaker 2: That helps them to do that.
Speaker 18: If they're not paying out their personal property, personal accounts,
Speaker 18: they will charge them with bribery.
Speaker 2: Now that's lawfare, and it shows the Bullets are not
Speaker 2: above using these kinds.
Speaker 18: Of tricks either, So both of them a pox on
Speaker 18: both of these factions. It's just disgusting to watch this.
Speaker 18: Every aspect of this when you look at it is disgusting.
Speaker 18: So Court in Texas, because this happened once before, had
Speaker 18: said that this falls under the umbrella of a division
Speaker 18: of powers, and I think they're right. You know, the
Speaker 18: legislature can decide what they want to do, and of
Speaker 18: course you know there's a fight within the legislature. And
Speaker 18: interestingly enough, Newsom wants to put himself into this as
Speaker 18: well because it's getting a lot of process, so there's
Speaker 18: an opportunity for him to grandstand and get his picture
Speaker 18: out there.
Speaker 2: How obnoxiousies and politicians are anyway.
Speaker 18: So he has said that because what they're looking to do,
Speaker 18: they think they can redistrict it and pick up by
Speaker 18: the manipulation that they can get five additional seats for
Speaker 18: Republicans in Congress out of Texas. And that's a big deal,
Speaker 18: as small as the majority is right now, and so
Speaker 18: Newsom says, well, that's fine, we'll redraw our maps and
Speaker 18: we'll neutral that by getting even more Democrats. I didn't
Speaker 18: know there's any Republican congressman really left out of California.
Speaker 18: I know there have been some of the past, but
Speaker 18: I haven't really kept up with it. So he's threatening
Speaker 18: to do that. So now Schwarzenegger has come out of
Speaker 18: political retirement, I guess to say that he's going to
Speaker 18: fight any redistricting plans in California that might be done
Speaker 18: by Newsom.
Speaker 2: He says, jerry mandering is evil.
Speaker 18: I've always opposed it, and we have that here, and
Speaker 18: Newsom is saying, well, I'm going to do it to
Speaker 18: neutralize Texas.
Speaker 2: So it's up to them.
Speaker 18: If they do this, then I will neutralize that.
Speaker 2: Well, as I.
Speaker 18: Said before, once you have said these congressional districts, just
Speaker 18: as we saw in North Carolina in twenty ten, everything
Speaker 18: flipped Republican except for the congressional seats. And so that
Speaker 18: tells you that the votes don't really matter that much.
Speaker 18: It's who's there. And there's a tremendous discrepancy, especially in
Speaker 18: Illinois where so many of them have fled. They went
Speaker 18: there because Illinois Governor Pritzker, his family owns the Hyatt fortune,
Speaker 18: and he's who has his family is also involved in
Speaker 18: heavily pushing transgenderism, and he's got a cousin who is
Speaker 18: a doppelganger for him, who dresses up like a woman.
Speaker 18: Every time I say his picture, I can't unsee the
Speaker 18: picture of the two of them next.
Speaker 2: To each other.
Speaker 18: Nevertheless, in Chicago, Illinois is a poster child.
Speaker 2: For how you can manipulate things.
Speaker 18: And as they point out, Democrats got fifty three percent
Speaker 18: of the popular vote in Illinois House races, but they
Speaker 18: took eighty two percent of the seats. So fifty three
Speaker 18: percent of the vote but eighty two percent of the seats,
Speaker 18: because you can manipulate that by picking the voters and
Speaker 18: grouping them in certain areas, you have now pretty much
Speaker 18: determined what's going to happen. So again, the Democrats do
Speaker 18: exactly the same thing. And as we saw in North Carolina,
Speaker 18: they had a fit about that. They went to the
Speaker 18: Supreme Court. I think over that saying you can't jerrymander
Speaker 18: when they have been doing it for centuries in North Carolina.
Speaker 18: So they're going to try to run the clock out,
Speaker 18: and Abbott is going to try to arrest them, charge
Speaker 18: them with bribery and kick them out and replace them
Speaker 18: with other people. Well, that's going to be a big
Speaker 18: legal fight, and it has nothing to do with any
Speaker 18: of us. It's simply about their power plays with each other.
Speaker 18: That's all that's about, especially since the parties don't stick
Speaker 18: to really any say, the Republican Party doesn't stick to
Speaker 18: any conservative principles, and the Democrats that just basically beclowned
Speaker 18: themselves with their obsession over LGBT, DEI and CRT and all.
Speaker 2: The rest of this stuff.
Speaker 18: But the entry seeing thing is what Abbott could do.
Speaker 18: Doesn't get the attention if he you know, when he
Speaker 18: grand stands and says, I'm going to arrest them, I'm
Speaker 18: going to throw them out of the legislature. The one
Speaker 18: thing that he could do is called another special session,
Speaker 18: and you know, of course the whole thing will start
Speaker 18: over again. But it'll be interesting to see how this
Speaker 18: thing operates, just out of curiosity, but it's not going
Speaker 18: to make any real difference with us. Look, the political
Speaker 18: parties have rigged this system. This is just one aspect
Speaker 18: of how rigged this system is. That's why I gave
Speaker 18: up on all this stuff. And I looked at I
Speaker 18: ran against it once. And it's kind of interesting because
Speaker 18: now you've got this loud mouse representative Jasmine Crockett out
Speaker 18: of Texas, and she says, they're going to redistrict me
Speaker 18: out of my seat. I won't be living in my
Speaker 18: district anymore. Well, there is no federal requirement that you
Speaker 18: live in the district. You have to be a resident
Speaker 18: of the state, but you don't have to be a
Speaker 18: resident of these gerrymandered districts. And I know that from
Speaker 18: personal experience. When I was involved in the Libertarian Party,
Speaker 18: they got ballot access and so I wanted to run
Speaker 18: a full sight of candidates. But there really wasn't anybody
Speaker 18: that really wanted to do that. I mean, the last
Speaker 18: thing in the world I would want is to have
Speaker 18: to go to Washington and sit there with Roberts rules
Speaker 18: of order and the corruption of somebody like Mike Johnson
Speaker 18: all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: What a nightmare that would be.
Speaker 18: But they didn't have anybody to run in the Charlotte district.
Speaker 18: And even though we lived over by Raleigh, I said,
Speaker 18: all right, I'll do it. And because you don't have
Speaker 18: to live in that district now, it makes it difficult
Speaker 18: because I had to commute to go there to do interviews,
Speaker 18: and I was in a TV debate that was there.
Speaker 18: But you know, I would we even got signs. I
Speaker 18: paid for it myself. I didn't want to get into
Speaker 18: any issues of the Federal Life Commission, and so I
Speaker 18: didn't want to take money from anybody and paid for
Speaker 18: the signs myself. Karen Trove of the van, we put
Speaker 18: the boys in the car seats that we're not young,
Speaker 18: and I would jump out and stick to signs in
Speaker 18: places where they had a bunch of political signs. They
Speaker 18: won't let you put up private signs about anything. But
Speaker 18: of course politicians can violate all the rules about signs
Speaker 18: and do with every election, as you've noticed probably. And
Speaker 18: then I went back and picked them all up again
Speaker 18: after the election was over, and I was pretty much
Speaker 18: done with politics after that. I was fed up with it.
Speaker 18: But she's saying, she said, they asked us about where
Speaker 18: we lived, and they've got our address and everything she
Speaker 18: said in Congress. They confirmed our addresses, she said, But
Speaker 18: I don't know how many of us actually still reside
Speaker 18: in the districts that we represent, because they're constantly changing
Speaker 18: the districts and they act as that somehow keeps him
Speaker 18: for money. And there might be some states where the
Speaker 18: state rules say that you have to live in that district,
Speaker 18: but there's no federal rule for that. And again she's
Speaker 18: questioning whether not people live in their districts or not,
Speaker 18: and probably many of them they don't necessarily have to.
Speaker 18: Makes it difficult. But the real issue in Texas. This
Speaker 18: is why I said, they're not doing anything that helps us.
Speaker 18: There's a real issue in Texas and it's been there
Speaker 18: for a long time. I've talked to Mark Hall many
Speaker 18: times about his essay Killing Ed. In it, he focused
Speaker 18: on a worst case example of schools of voucher schools,
Speaker 18: which is the Fatala Gulin Schools.
Speaker 17: Now.
Speaker 18: Fatala Gulin is a mystic cleric who began as an
Speaker 18: ally of Ertuwan in Turkey, and they both started to
Speaker 18: move Turkey in a more Islamic direction. It had been
Speaker 18: a secular republic and with a lot with a lot
Speaker 18: of Muslims that were there. Then they became rivals, bitter rivals,
Speaker 18: and there were a lot of Fatalogulin followers because he's
Speaker 18: a cleric. He is a mystic cleric, and he's got
Speaker 18: a lot of people who follow his brand of Islam.
Speaker 18: And they have schools all over the world. They had
Speaker 18: at the time I was talking to Mark Hall about
Speaker 18: eight years ago, I guess they had over one thousand
Speaker 18: madrasas throughout the world. And yet in Texas they were
Speaker 18: getting state money for these charter schools, and they continued
Speaker 18: to increase it. The last time I talked to him
Speaker 18: is about seven and fifty million dollars a year they're
Speaker 18: getting from the State of Texas for their schools, pretending
Speaker 18: that they had nothing to do with Islam or Turkey
Speaker 18: or Fortalogulin, which was all a lie. And there was
Speaker 18: a lot of corruption other issues, and you can see that.
Speaker 18: It's an interesting documentary Killing Ed and it was a
Speaker 18: bit difficult for Mark. There was a lot of obstacles
Speaker 18: put in his way, a lot of threats are putting
Speaker 18: in and a.
Speaker 2: Lot of corruption.
Speaker 18: And in Texas there's a lot of corruption with not
Speaker 18: just the usual Democrats that we expect, but also with Republicans.
Speaker 18: You've got the guy who's now lieutenant Government is a
Speaker 18: very interesting section in the in the documentary Killing ed
Speaker 18: where he interviews the Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, and Dan
Speaker 18: Patrick and me, these Republicans had been had taken paid
Speaker 18: vacations to go to Turkey where they're wined and dined,
Speaker 18: and they, you know, basically get them on their side.
Speaker 18: And they did the same thing with some handpicked students.
Speaker 18: So the whole thing is about nudging them towards Turkey,
Speaker 18: towards Fatalulan, towards Islam and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 18: But they maintain this facade of it being strictly secular.
Speaker 18: They call them schools of Science and Math, and they're
Speaker 18: probably up to about a billion dollars at this point
Speaker 18: because they will continue to open up more and more schools.
Speaker 18: There was a report on WND an interview with one
Speaker 18: guy talking about Sharia law in Texas, and if you remember,
Speaker 18: there was an entire community that Abbot said, you're not
Speaker 18: going to be allowed to create this community here because
Speaker 18: they know you're going to use it to create Sharia
Speaker 18: law and an Islamic community here. And he had some statistics.
Speaker 18: He said, there's four hundred and fifty thousand Muslims in Texas.
Speaker 18: There's over three hundred and thirty mosques, entire Sharia compliant
Speaker 18: neighborhoods are reshaping the state of Texas. He said, right
Speaker 18: under Governor Abbots knows, homeowners association fees will fund mosques,
Speaker 18: Islamic courtse are operating in the shadows, and public schools
Speaker 18: are bending to the pressure. It doesn't even mention in
Speaker 18: this summary here what's going on with the charter schools
Speaker 18: of Fataligulin. Politicians talk tough, but nothing changes. If you
Speaker 18: think this is only Dearborn or Minneapolis, think again. What
Speaker 18: happens in Texas is not going to stay in Texas.
Speaker 18: There's a cultural takeover and no one in power is
Speaker 18: stopping it. Why Because they're only concerned about their career
Speaker 18: and staying in office perpetually and about their little faction,
Speaker 18: their little political party, being dominant. That's what they're concerned about.
Speaker 18: They will let the state be taken over by radical Muslims,
Speaker 18: but they won't and they won't do a thing about that.
Speaker 18: They're not even talking about that. Instead, it's all about
Speaker 18: the competition between their two private clubs. And that's really
Speaker 18: what it boils down to, the complete disconnect from what
Speaker 18: this country really needs. Well, it's not just between Republicans
Speaker 18: and Democrats. It's also Republicans versus Republicans and Democrats versus Democrats.
Speaker 18: Biden handlers are ready to unleash a trove of embarrassing
Speaker 18: Kamala Harris stories because she's supposedly doing a toll all book.
Speaker 18: And they took Mark Halpern, who's been a long time
Speaker 18: Democrat journalists. They basically use this guy to send a
Speaker 18: warning Kalala Harris that they're going to just evis read
Speaker 18: or shouldn't be too hard. Actually we've all all seen
Speaker 18: it and what she's capable. And he said they are
Speaker 18: going to they're ready. He said, wait till you hear
Speaker 18: the palin Esque stories.
Speaker 2: And I had to look at what are.
Speaker 18: They talking about talking about Sarah Palin? Remember how they
Speaker 18: made fun of her She said, you know, you can
Speaker 18: see Russia from Alaska and things like that, which again,
Speaker 18: you know the argument that she never said that, but
Speaker 18: that was the they ridiculed her when she was picked
Speaker 18: by John McCain. McCain needed a running mate, you know,
Speaker 18: McCain being an angry old white guy who wanted war
Speaker 18: with everybody. When they put Obama in, he had to
Speaker 18: have some kind of a counter DEI so he had
Speaker 18: to get a woman to come in, and they picked
Speaker 18: Sarah palin And who exhibited a great deal of flakiness.
Speaker 2: And a lot of different things that she was doing.
Speaker 18: But anyway, they came up with pallinesque stories about how
Speaker 18: much I tried to help her, but she was just
Speaker 18: beyond help and she was in no position to run
Speaker 18: or to govern. So Mark Halpern says, oh, he was
Speaker 18: contacted by people on the Biden party. So now he
Speaker 18: goes on TV and he fires this warning shot, saying,
Speaker 18: if you're going to talk about how incompetent and senile
Speaker 18: Biden is, we're going to talk about how stupid Lalla
Speaker 18: is joined the club. I think we all saw that. Anyway,
Speaker 18: he says, you'll hear stories about law Law as vice
Speaker 18: president that will not make her look good.
Speaker 2: Said help her.
Speaker 18: They are, it's not like they're war currently, But I'm
Speaker 18: telling you, if Joe Biden feels threatened, if his people
Speaker 18: feel threatened by her, this is going to escalate in
Speaker 18: a big way. Isn't it interesting that they would take
Speaker 18: Mark Halpern, who has been a journalist and Democrat operative,
Speaker 18: and they would use him to send this warning publicly
Speaker 18: to laaw. He further asserted that the Biden inner circle
Speaker 18: pulled out all the stops and trying to help her
Speaker 18: do the job of vice president. They gave her every
Speaker 18: opportunity they did. They found in some instances that she
Speaker 18: had some issues.
Speaker 2: He emphasized. That's putting a modey, isn't it.
Speaker 18: Meanwhile, one of Biden's top aides, Mike Donalan, has revealed
Speaker 18: that he made a whopping four million dollars working for
Speaker 18: him in twenty twenty four alone. This came out as
Speaker 18: a House Oversight committee was investigating the cover up of
Speaker 18: Biden's mental condition and Sean Spice release that said top
Speaker 18: Biden aid was promised eight million dollars for twenty twenty
Speaker 18: four win, four million dollars to up and run another
Speaker 18: four million if he won, but he only got half
Speaker 18: of that. Meanwhile, in the GOP, we're seeing angry fights
Speaker 18: with the influencers. We saw last week we saw Candice
Speaker 18: Owen and Tucker Carlson fighting with Nick Fuintes, and now
Speaker 18: Laura Lumer is fighting with Tucker Carlson and her beef
Speaker 18: with him is the fact that he opposed Trump on
Speaker 18: the Wars.
Speaker 2: Laura Lumer will.
Speaker 18: Doesn't care whether we have World War three with nuclear weapons,
Speaker 18: don't say anything bad about Trump. That's her calculus right there.
Speaker 18: As they say in this article here of The Independent,
Speaker 18: they call her a vocal ally. I know, she's a
Speaker 18: vocal sycophant of Donald Trump. That's where she gets her clout,
Speaker 18: and that's she is obsessed with that. A very disturbed individual,
Speaker 18: quite fit. Remember when she got kicked off of Google,
Speaker 18: she couldn't handle it and uh she uh she chained
Speaker 18: herself to the uh to one of Google's office buildings
Speaker 18: and basically had a public nervous breakdown over it, which
Speaker 18: was really sad that somebody is that connected.
Speaker 2: She's as bad as Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 18: Really in terms of uh, you know, that's her entire life,
Speaker 18: her future, everything she listen for. As Hillary Clinton says,
Speaker 18: the politics of meaning. And I think what she means
Speaker 18: by that is that that's what gives meaning to her life.
Speaker 18: And as I said many many times, what a pathetic
Speaker 18: thing of all things. I mean, we can all make
Speaker 18: our careers the meaning of our lives, and that that
Speaker 18: is a sad thing if we do that. But how
Speaker 18: sad to make something like politics something that's going to
Speaker 18: give you a meaning in your life, that is anyway.
Speaker 18: She called Tucker Crasson a terrible person in a fraud.
Speaker 18: He had said that she was like a child wielding
Speaker 18: a loaded firearm called twitter. I think that's pretty accurate. Actually,
Speaker 18: she said, I'm so glad that many people are starting
Speaker 18: to see what terrible person Tucker Croslson is. I'm glad
Speaker 18: people's eyes are opening to what a fraud this guy is.
Speaker 18: And I got to say, when you go back, if
Speaker 18: you want to look to see what a fraud he is,
Speaker 18: go back and look at how he was one of
Speaker 18: the most vile liars in terms of nine to eleven.
Speaker 18: There was not anybody any worse than Tucker Cralson. He
Speaker 18: wouldn't let people even show videos and he just mocked them.
Speaker 18: He's I just get all these calls about well, what
Speaker 18: is a melting temperature of steel?
Speaker 2: He goes, what's up with these people?
Speaker 18: What's their problem, pretending that he didn't know, And then
Speaker 18: when he gets out, he says, well, you can't talk
Speaker 18: about that stuff.
Speaker 2: You'll get fired.
Speaker 18: So you will talk about whatever is not whatever will
Speaker 18: make you twenty five million dollars a year? Is that right, Tucker?
Speaker 18: And of course, Laura Lumber is no different either. She
Speaker 18: just has her different set of goals here. And so
Speaker 18: she followed up with the post asking do you want
Speaker 18: to know something about Tucker Crosson that nobody knows except me.
Speaker 18: She's just she's just a mega gossiper with her Twitter account.
Speaker 18: I mean, that's all that is, is just a gossip.
Speaker 18: She's gossip gal. She said something that should be the
Speaker 18: nail in his coffin that makes everyone realize what a
Speaker 18: fraud he is. And then she put out the thirteen
Speaker 18: post thread saying that he tried to suppress a story
Speaker 18: about a compromising laptop supposedly belonging to Hunter Biden because
Speaker 18: you know they're friends. I guess I didn't read the thread.
Speaker 18: I'm not interested in anything that Laura Lumer has to say.
Speaker 18: She's completely sold out for access. But you know, Tucker
Speaker 18: had defended Hunter, which I think raised a lot of eyebrows.
Speaker 18: Is like, you know, Hunter is, I've got some really
Speaker 18: serious issues. And it's not to say that she can't
Speaker 18: be friends with somebody because you disagree with them politically.
Speaker 18: I have friends I disagree with politically, but he's got
Speaker 18: some real personal issues. Obviously, by the way, when you
Speaker 18: look at what the Bidens are willing to do. That's
Speaker 18: we've already seen that with Hunter. He came out swinging
Speaker 18: last week as well against the people that he thinks
Speaker 18: pushed his father out of running for reelection. But you know,
Speaker 18: when we look at Tucker, it wasn't just nine to
Speaker 18: eleven twenty years ago.
Speaker 2: It was also.
Speaker 18: What he would not do with the lockdown, what he
Speaker 18: would not do with the vaks, and that is he
Speaker 18: wouldn't tell people and people die. You know, when we
Speaker 18: saw what happened with nine to eleven, it was over
Speaker 18: and done with, and we should have exposed it for
Speaker 18: what it was because it was the first shoe to
Speaker 18: drop lockdown and warp Speed was the second shoe to drop.
Speaker 18: It was all tied together from the very beginning with
Speaker 18: Dark Winter and the cover ups with that. But when
Speaker 18: he remained silent with this, this is a slow moving
Speaker 18: crime scene. And by not speaking out and not telling
Speaker 18: people about the dangers of the vaccine and not resisting
Speaker 18: this lockdown and masking and all the rest of stuff,
Speaker 18: he allowed legal precedents to be set with the lockdown
Speaker 18: and the rest of stuff, and he allowed people to
Speaker 18: be injured and killed with these vaccines. So I'm not
Speaker 18: a fan of Tucker either, just like a fan of
Speaker 18: the Republicans or the Democrats. Tucker has not been shy
Speaker 18: about criticizing her in the past, calling her the world's
Speaker 18: creepiest human and one podcast in June and he said,
Speaker 18: I don't even know where she came from or who
Speaker 18: she is exactly, but she's running around saying I'm Donald
Speaker 18: Trump's defender. He says, it's bizarre. Well, we do know
Speaker 18: where Tucker Carlson came from. He came from his father
Speaker 18: worked for a Voice of America. It was CIA propaganda
Speaker 18: for the longest period of time. The war of words
Speaker 18: between the two MAGA influencers, says The Independent, first erupted
Speaker 18: just prior to that when Carlson came out against Trump's
Speaker 18: decision to bomb Around's nuclear facilities and support of Israel,
Speaker 18: opposing further American involvement in conflicts overseas, and he went
Speaker 18: viral when he challenged Ted Cruz over his ignorance of Tehran.
Speaker 18: Well again, for that, he did the right thing, and
Speaker 18: we need to take these issues one at a time.
Speaker 18: I have a hard time overlooking Tucker Carlson's past but
Speaker 18: when he comes out and opposes wars that we are
Speaker 18: initiating wars that could blow up literally in our faces,
Speaker 18: I think he did.
Speaker 2: The right thing.
Speaker 18: Lumor derided him over the claim last fall that he
Speaker 18: was mauled by Nieman in the sleep I meantion.
Speaker 2: She pointed out that she was nowhere near him at
Speaker 2: the time anyway.
Speaker 18: But Trumps asked about Lumour by the press corps, of course,
Speaker 18: that she was traveling with him.
Speaker 2: He says, she's very nice.
Speaker 18: I mean, I know she's known as radical right, but
Speaker 18: I think Laura Lumer is a very nice person. He's
Speaker 18: noticed that he is slightly moving himself to distance himself
Speaker 18: from the radical right. As he said, you know, they
Speaker 18: were going to have problems with what he was doing
Speaker 18: and with Epstein. I know, I'm going to get a
Speaker 18: lot of criticism from the radical right and so forth.
Speaker 18: But he said, I've known her for a long time.
Speaker 18: You know, personally, I think she's a patriot. Well, you know,
Speaker 18: this is coming from somebody who praised Jeffrey Epstein and
Speaker 18: hung out with him for about fifteen years, So that's
Speaker 18: kind of faint praise, I guess. But as I look
Speaker 18: at this and I was thinking about all this gerrymandering.
Speaker 18: And when I was involved in politics, I saw this
Speaker 18: op ed from Newt Gingrich, who thinks the Republicans and
Speaker 18: win in November on their support for the budget bill. Well,
Speaker 18: I guess maybe he has a better gauge on public
Speaker 18: opinion than I do. But I tell you, when I
Speaker 18: ran it was the term after nineteen nine two. If
Speaker 18: you remember, new Gingrich had his contract with the American
Speaker 18: and he had ten things on the Contract of America.
Speaker 18: And I thought, well, that's fine. I don't necessarily some
Speaker 18: of them I didn't think were important, certainly not enough
Speaker 18: to run on. But you know, that kind of coalesced
Speaker 18: everybody around, and people looked at it. So when I
Speaker 18: ran for Congress, I created a flyer and I said,
Speaker 18: this is my Contract of the America. It's called the
Speaker 18: Bill of Rights. Have you ever heard of this? And
Speaker 18: I talked about how every one of the Bill of
Speaker 18: Rights were being violated and the violation had been ignored
Speaker 18: by Gingrich and the Republicans for the past two years
Speaker 18: that they were in power. And so I guess he
Speaker 18: knows better than I do, because he's been a lot
Speaker 18: more successful in terms of elections. He's a very clever
Speaker 18: manipulator and things like the Contract of the America said that.
Speaker 18: But I don't just don't see how in the world
Speaker 18: the one big beautiful bill. I don't see how that's
Speaker 18: a winning issue. It's going to bankrupt us as part
Speaker 18: of the great financial reset so they can change the
Speaker 18: way the financial system is structured. They want to bankrupt us,
Speaker 18: and it will. You know, Trump has been adding to
Speaker 18: the deficit by leaps and bounds, and we have such
Speaker 18: a large deficit now that in a few years it's
Speaker 18: going to be the biggest item there. And it's squeezing
Speaker 18: the credit markets. Whether Trump is able to lower the
Speaker 18: interest rates or not, you're not going to see the
Speaker 18: interest rates lowered on home mortgages. We've already seen this
Speaker 18: when the Federal Reserve lower the rates. Everybody looked at
Speaker 18: and said, well, that's going to fuel inflation. So i
Speaker 18: want more for the long term interest rates. I'm not
Speaker 18: going to pay for the I'm not going to pay
Speaker 18: for the government bonds. And so you know, he's looking
Speaker 18: at this and he's desperate as he keeps adding and
Speaker 18: adding and adding and irresponsibly to the debt. Irresponsible spending
Speaker 18: is runs throughout this whole thing, and so he thinks
Speaker 18: his salvation is going to be lowering the interest rates.
Speaker 18: I don't think it's going to do that. It's not
Speaker 18: going to It'll help him, but it's not going to
Speaker 18: help America. It's not going to get the interest rates
Speaker 18: down for us. If they were really concerned about helping us,
Speaker 18: Trump would be focused on the user's interest rates. The
Speaker 18: situation that we have right now in the banks where
Speaker 18: they pay you zero if you put the money in
Speaker 18: a checking account or a savings account. Right they pay
Speaker 18: you a fraction of one percent, but then they charge
Speaker 18: on the other hand, they charge twenty thirty percent for
Speaker 18: credit cards. And I look at it, and I would
Speaker 18: love to hear what my father would say about that.
Speaker 2: He would.
Speaker 18: He would absolutely be I could not believe the situation
Speaker 18: that they would pay you a tiny fraction of one
Speaker 18: percent for your savings account and then they would charge
Speaker 18: you twenty thirty forty percent on a credit card. That
Speaker 18: is absolutely criminal. It was called userss all through his
Speaker 18: lifetime and up until about nineteen eighty when they got
Speaker 18: rid of the usery laws. So it is so skewed.
Speaker 18: It's ridiculous. But they're not going to do anything to
Speaker 18: reform that abusive power. No, those are the people who
Speaker 18: give them money for their campaigns. Instead they're going to
Speaker 18: do is continue to do the same thing over and
Speaker 18: over again, and that is continue to spend and kick
Speaker 18: the candy on the road.
Speaker 2: New gingri trites.
Speaker 18: Every Republican incumbent and candidate should embrace debating the One
Speaker 18: Big Beautiful Bill. It is one of the most pro worker,
Speaker 18: pro family, and pro small business laws in America.
Speaker 2: No, it isn't.
Speaker 18: If you're going to increase a deficit by many trillions
Speaker 18: of dollars at each pen stroke with us, which is
Speaker 18: what they've done repeatedly, that is not pro family, that
Speaker 18: is not pro business, That is not pro America. This
Speaker 18: policy of destroying us with a mountain of debt is
Speaker 18: disgusting and I'm disgusted with these politicians again, as I said,
Speaker 18: my contract with America is a bill of rights, which
Speaker 18: these people are disgusted with. They have absolutely no use
Speaker 18: for it. Well, I just had to get that off
Speaker 18: my chest here. But I'll say one thing that I
Speaker 18: think is good, and I'm very happy to see it.
Speaker 2: And I don't know how in the world had happened,
Speaker 2: and that is.
Speaker 18: The defunding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and NPR.
Speaker 2: I grew up with all of that.
Speaker 18: That's about I guess I'm just slightly older than these
Speaker 18: propaganda outlets.
Speaker 2: I used to always laugh about it being a national
Speaker 2: propaganda radio, and I listened to it a.
Speaker 18: Great deal because they were the station that carried classical music.
Speaker 18: But then as I was listening to it, they encroached
Speaker 18: on it.
Speaker 2: More and more and more with.
Speaker 18: News and politics and radical, radical leftist news as we
Speaker 18: all know, and it was quite annoying to get to
Speaker 18: the point where you couldn't hear the classical music for
Speaker 18: all the rantings of the left. So I watched this
Speaker 18: thing metastasize like a cancer, and it truly is annoying
Speaker 18: that we have to pay for it. So there was
Speaker 18: an article by Jonathan Turley. His take on it was
Speaker 18: that they had a choice. He said people wanted them
Speaker 18: to reform, they wanted them to be less radical, more
Speaker 18: even handed, but they preferred death to reform. Basically what
Speaker 18: he was saying, he said, they're going to stop operation
Speaker 18: by September thirty.
Speaker 2: It's hard to believe.
Speaker 18: I'm anxious to see that, but I still am skeptical,
Speaker 18: but not that'll happen. But they went from classical music
Speaker 18: actually to classical Marxism and struggle sessions, which is what
Speaker 18: you would see here on there all the time. As
Speaker 18: Ronald Reagan said, a government program is let's see, you
Speaker 18: got a video about MPR on the top in the deck.
Speaker 18: Can you just play that what we have about that?
Speaker 18: Go ahead and play that.
Speaker 19: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down its operations
Speaker 19: after a massive federal funding cut. The Trump administration says
Speaker 19: taxpayers should not fund what he calls.
Speaker 2: Quote biased media.
Speaker 19: But that cut could have wide ranging impacts. Our Chad
Speaker 19: Mills found out what it could mean right here in
Speaker 19: the Bay Area.
Speaker 18: Inevitable that this is about usf from this loss of
Speaker 18: fund WEDU.
Speaker 6: It's not shaking the optimism here at WEDU. From mister
Speaker 6: Rogers to Sesame Street, from Dalton Abbey to the documentaries
Speaker 6: of Ken Burns. There's shows we love and they were broadcasting.
Speaker 2: Well when people pay for them without government subsidies, thanks.
Speaker 6: To funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Speaker 20: It's content that is good for your mind, makes you smarty.
Speaker 6: But the future of public media is now in question. Friday,
Speaker 6: the Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced plans to shut down
Speaker 6: after a billion dollar cut in federal funding. President Trump
Speaker 6: and other Republicans believe public media is left leaning.
Speaker 2: This is one of the most important and believe it.
Speaker 2: Us in the community believe it.
Speaker 6: Thinks we'll have a direct impact in Tampa Bay at
Speaker 6: both WUSF, Tampa's NPR radio station, and at WEDU, the
Speaker 6: area's PBS station. Paul Grove is president and CEO.
Speaker 20: The gap that we have is a huge gap.
Speaker 2: He said.
Speaker 6: The funding cut will leave wedu's budget with a roughly
Speaker 6: three million dollar hole.
Speaker 20: WDU has been around for seventy years nearly and we
Speaker 20: expect to be here for another seventy years.
Speaker 6: Paul is optimistic, but the cut will have an impact.
Speaker 6: WEDU might have to buy less national programming. Local programs
Speaker 6: it produces might be delayed. He also can't roll out
Speaker 6: a reduction in staff.
Speaker 2: We don't know just yet.
Speaker 6: WUSF is facing a roughly eight hundred thousand dollars loss
Speaker 6: in funding. It's GM says the radio station will continue
Speaker 6: to serve its listeners, but you'll need them to donate
Speaker 6: to help fill the gap. Same for WEDU.
Speaker 20: It can't just be a small bump for a short
Speaker 20: period of time. It has to be something that people
Speaker 20: believe in long term.
Speaker 6: Only with that support will this station be able to
Speaker 6: continue its mission, a mission that Paul says is without
Speaker 6: political agenda.
Speaker 20: I don't believe PBSW.
Speaker 2: He says the old d's educate. He thinks it's actually
Speaker 2: radically right.
Speaker 6: The culture and to inform Tampa Bay during emergencies, as
Speaker 6: your donations are now vital to public media in Tampa Bay.
Speaker 6: Will show you how you can donate on our website,
Speaker 6: Abcaction News dot Com in Tampa Chad Mills, ABC Action News, well, you.
Speaker 2: Know that will get their money from big pharmaceutical.
Speaker 18: Companies just like ABC does, and probably the big pharmaceutical
Speaker 18: companies will chip in. It'll be a virtue signaling leftists
Speaker 18: who will keep them afloat. As Jonathan Turley says, they've
Speaker 18: been able most of their life to shrug this off
Speaker 18: because of Democrat control. But even after the GOP got control,
Speaker 18: they were defiant in denying they had any bias. Total propaganda,
Speaker 18: total partisanship. That's what the P and MPR stands for.
Speaker 2: He said, the corporational public.
Speaker 18: Public broadcasting is funding a wide array of programs, and
Speaker 18: all they had to do is just change the types
Speaker 18: of programs that they're funding. But they don't want to
Speaker 18: do that. They just get more and more, as he said,
Speaker 18: strident and partisan every year. It's absolutely true. They see
Speaker 18: themselves as hero institutions standing up to social and political reactionaries.
Speaker 18: See the thing is, they see this just like Laura
Speaker 18: Lumer on the right. They see this as the mission
Speaker 18: of their life, and we too frequently don't stand up
Speaker 18: for what we value. These people have, even as sad
Speaker 18: as it is, they have a real commitment to to
Speaker 18: Marxism or communism or the leftist causes, and they're willing
Speaker 18: to do whatever it takes. They're not the only figures
Speaker 18: choosing death over social Dishonor says to early efforts to
Speaker 18: restore balance and neutrality at The Washington Post had a
Speaker 18: similar effect. Even after the CEO told the staff the
Speaker 18: newspaper was bleeding readers and revenue, they refused to yield,
Speaker 18: He says, they couldn't. They were writing to a shrinking
Speaker 18: audience of predominantly white, affluent liberal listeners and major cities
Speaker 18: who even though they can afford it. They don't want
Speaker 18: to chip in the money to pay for this broadcasting right.
Speaker 18: They want the government to pay for it.
Speaker 2: He says. Conversely, the Corporation for Public.
Speaker 18: Broadcasting is laying off its entire staff in a righteous,
Speaker 18: indignant huff. None of these people needed to lose their
Speaker 18: jobs if their leadership served their organization by listening to
Speaker 18: views beyond their own insular circle of enabler. The demise
Speaker 18: of CPB now stands as the most impressive and an
Speaker 18: unnecessary act of self termination. But it is highly appreciated
Speaker 18: by many of us. And when we look at this
Speaker 18: and the massive amounts of money that they take, not
Speaker 18: only are they pushing this propaganda, but they're doing it
Speaker 18: very inefficiently. Two billion dollars to run that radio station
Speaker 18: is just ridiculous anyway, And that's just the shortfall that
Speaker 18: they have because they're getting a lot of money from
Speaker 18: the university as well. So it is highly appreciated that
Speaker 18: they are now going to throw the towel in because
Speaker 18: they're not getting their way, and we can all hope
Speaker 18: that that.
Speaker 2: Is going to happen.
Speaker 18: Well, I just want to say before I go, I
Speaker 18: really do appreciate the support that we have been given,
Speaker 18: and thank you so much for staying with us. The
Speaker 18: last couple of months. I've been working real hard trying
Speaker 18: to get my voice back. When I start speaking more
Speaker 18: rapidly and my tongue can't keep up and so it
Speaker 18: starts slurring. Apologize for that. I keep working on it,
Speaker 18: try to slow things down. But fortunately it didn't affect
Speaker 18: my mind. Unfortunately it affected my tongue. And so I
Speaker 18: really do appreciate the support that you've been giving us
Speaker 18: and hope that we've been giving you some information that
Speaker 18: you can use. That's our intent, and also to point
Speaker 18: you to things in life, your family, your relationship with Christ.
Speaker 18: These are things that matter. Whether the Republicans or Democrats
Speaker 18: are in charge of their respective legislative bodies, that's going
Speaker 18: to have some effect, and we need to keep our
Speaker 18: eyes open as to what the threats are going to be.
Speaker 18: Each of these parties represents a threat to you. They
Speaker 18: both represent a different threat to you. So that's what
Speaker 18: we try to clarify with this, so that you can
Speaker 18: have some advance warning and make some preparation for it.
Speaker 18: But thank you so much for your support, and we
Speaker 18: especially think and I don't have the web address of
Speaker 18: the home products that we sell, but I got to
Speaker 18: say that I don't want to mention his name, but
Speaker 18: he has been somebody that I've known for a while.
Speaker 18: And yeah, there we go right the Homestead store. And
Speaker 18: he works very hard and he is a person who
Speaker 18: has the utmost integrity. That's why I was happy to
Speaker 18: carry his products. And I appreciate your supporting him as well.
Speaker 18: He is somebody who has been tested. I watched him
Speaker 18: pass the test and he paid a price for it
Speaker 18: as well. But he got back up and he's working
Speaker 18: with this as well. And it was it was a
Speaker 18: crooked government thing that was his test, and he was
Speaker 18: stood that and was punished by the crooks and government.
Speaker 18: So Homestead Products dot shop, take a look at that.
Speaker 18: We have a link at our website David Night dot News.
Speaker 18: And I'm gonna take a break and Travis will be
Speaker 18: right back, and uh, we'll be back in just a moment.
Speaker 18: Here m.
Speaker 2: HM joined listening to the David Knight Show Decoding the
Speaker 2: mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome, welcome back, folks. It's a pleasure to see my
Speaker 3: dad back in the studio and of course, if they
Speaker 3: are so popular, I'm sure their programs will continue. They
Speaker 3: don't need to be getting our tax dollars. However, the
Speaker 3: David Knight Show does not receive any tax dollars, so
Speaker 3: if you would like to see this show continue, you
Speaker 3: can go to the Davidnightshow dot com, Davidknight dot news
Speaker 3: and see all the ways you can support the show.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 3: There is cash app, zell, bitcoin address, and a host
Speaker 3: of different products, whether it's the coin that Jason Barker
Speaker 3: put together or shirts and hoodies. You can also go
Speaker 3: to subscribe Star dot com, forward slash. The Davidnight Show
Speaker 3: got a lot of different tiers there. Maybe one of
Speaker 3: them fits your budget, and if so, we ask that
Speaker 3: you do subscribe and help support the show. Go to
Speaker 3: Davidnight dot goal Tony Arbern to set that up. So
Speaker 3: if you'd like to start accumulating some gold or silver
Speaker 3: to get outside of the Fiat monetary system, you can
Speaker 3: do that there. There's Trends Journal dot com, or with
Speaker 3: promo code Night you get ten percent off. Jerald Sluinte
Speaker 3: works very very hard and puts in a lot of
Speaker 3: excellent information. There's also RNC where with promo code night,
Speaker 3: you get ten percent off as well. You can start
Speaker 3: seeing if their products are helpful to you and will
Speaker 3: help get you outside of the medical industrial complex. There's
Speaker 3: also Homestead Product Stop Homestead Products dot shop, where again
Speaker 3: with promo code night, you get ten percent off all
Speaker 3: of their handmade, made in America products, which they work
Speaker 3: very hard on and want to make sure they're providing
Speaker 3: you the best, highest quality products they can and they
Speaker 3: are working very very hard to do that. There's also
Speaker 3: jackloss in Books dot Com where you can get the
Speaker 3: Civil Defense Manual. You can start learning how to protect
Speaker 3: yourself and your community in times of civil unrest, how
Speaker 3: you can make sure you have water and food. You
Speaker 3: don't have water, you will expire very very quickly, So
Speaker 3: check out all of those links. We really do appreciate
Speaker 3: everything that you do to support the show. Is our
Speaker 3: time is the music is playing well. Thank you all
Speaker 3: for tuning in today. It has been a pleasure to
Speaker 3: be here with you, just as it's a pleasure to
Speaker 3: see my dad back in the studio. Hopefully he'll be
Speaker 3: doing more and more and he'll be seeing less and
Speaker 3: less of me, who really cannot thank you enough for
Speaker 3: all that you do to support his show and our family.
Speaker 3: So God bless you all. Have a wonderful rest of
Speaker 3: your day and I will be back tomorrow.
Speaker 7: I want to see you there and thank you for
Speaker 7: the chip. Don't frag me bro.
Speaker 18: The common Man. They created common Core a dumb down
Speaker 18: our children. They created common Past to track and control us.
Speaker 18: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 18: and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see.
Speaker 18: The common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, But each of
Speaker 18: us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 2: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 2: they want to take away.
Speaker 18: The most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 18: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 18: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 18: information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 18: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 18: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 18: The Davidknightshow dot Com