Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the twenty fourth
Speaker 2: of October. Here of our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a look at what is happening
Speaker 2: with immigration again the basis for the rollout of military
Speaker 2: as well as the new Ice storm Troopers. A guy
Speaker 2: I'm going to begin with a story about a guy
Speaker 2: who was arrested for following them and playing the Imperial
Speaker 2: March from Star Wars. He said, it's a protest, and
Speaker 2: he said, you define protests. They have a different definition
Speaker 2: for protests. Evidently protest does not include satire, and they
Speaker 2: have no sense of humor. And they are rolling out
Speaker 2: surveillance to surveil everybody. This is just like the digital ID,
Speaker 2: if you've got to have a digital ID to protect
Speaker 2: you from the problem that the government created, and it's
Speaker 2: for everybody. So we're going to take a look at that.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a look at what is happening
Speaker 2: with the beef producers as well. Trump is now pushing
Speaker 2: back on these guys. They were not servile and appreciative
Speaker 2: enough of their king. They'll be right back. Well, as
Speaker 2: I said, a DC man is suing now. After he
Speaker 2: was arrested, he followed around the National Guard troops in
Speaker 2: DC and started playing the Star Wars on his phone,
Speaker 2: just on his phone. It wasn't like he had anything
Speaker 2: really loud, and they didn't like that, and they told
Speaker 2: him to start. The guy's name is Sam O'Hara. At first,
Speaker 2: I thought, is this Sam Hide? He could have put
Speaker 2: Sam o'hid He's a comedian who's always at the center
Speaker 2: of these things. But anyway, he began following them around
Speaker 2: and he said this is a huge waste of taxpayer money.
Speaker 2: It said, needless display of force, and it is a
Speaker 2: surreal danger. So they decided they would prove that he
Speaker 2: was right lessen two minut after he began doing this,
Speaker 2: a sergeant Beck turned around and said, hey, man, if
Speaker 2: you're going to keep following us, we can contact the
Speaker 2: Metro Police Department. They can come handle you if that's
Speaker 2: what you want. Is that what you want to do.
Speaker 2: He allegedly did not respond, but he continued to follow,
Speaker 2: at which point the Empire decided to strike back. Beck
Speaker 2: called the Metropolitan Police Department and the lawsuit claims that
Speaker 2: shortly after several MPD cars arrived, the officers allegedly accused
Speaker 2: him for arresting the soldiers and they detained a handcuffed them.
Speaker 2: There was evidently nobody within the group that said, huns,
Speaker 2: are we the stormtroopers? That didn't happen. So anyway, when
Speaker 2: O'Hara argued that he was engaged in protest, one of
Speaker 2: the MPD officers allegedly responded, that's not a protest. You
Speaker 2: better to find protest. This isn't a protest, you're not protesting.
Speaker 2: And so I guess that's the question, right. Isn't that
Speaker 2: a simple word to define? And the police don't have
Speaker 2: a definition for it. So anyway, it's whatever they say
Speaker 2: it is, right, just like the truth is whatever they say,
Speaker 2: the news is whatever they say. Recording and mocking law
Speaker 2: enforcement are both firmly protected by the First Amendment as
Speaker 2: long as it doesn't interfere with their duties. But again
Speaker 2: that doesn't really apply. We just saw ice ramming the
Speaker 2: car of a man who was recording them, and they
Speaker 2: justified it and said, well, you know, he's interfering with
Speaker 2: what we're doing here, as he was trying to get
Speaker 2: away from them ramming his truck anyway.
Speaker 3: I mean, this was clearly a front of violence. Doesn't
Speaker 3: they know what the Empire did it older on?
Speaker 2: That's right, Supreme Court Justice William Brennan in nineteen eighty seven,
Speaker 2: and are ruling striking down a Houston ordinance. Listen to this.
Speaker 2: It unlawful to oppose or to interrupt a police officer,
Speaker 2: he said. The freedom of the individuals verbally to oppose
Speaker 2: or to challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is
Speaker 2: one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a
Speaker 2: free nation from a police state. I think we could
Speaker 2: say then that according to the Supreme Court, we may
Speaker 2: not know what a protest is, we may not have
Speaker 2: a definition of a protest, but I think we have
Speaker 2: a definition of a police state that fits our country
Speaker 2: right now. I see people getting arrested or beaten or
Speaker 2: whatever who challenge the police all the time. That is
Speaker 2: something they do not allow. To put it in another way,
Speaker 2: if you act like an autocratic villain, then someone compares
Speaker 2: you to an autocratic villain, you just might be an
Speaker 2: autocratic villain, says Reason magazine. Are we the ice storm troopers? Yeah?
Speaker 2: So armed national guards should not be policing dcience as
Speaker 2: we walk around our neighborhood. Said the man O'Hara. It's
Speaker 2: important to me not to normalize this dystopian occupation. Instead
Speaker 2: of respecting my right to protest, police officers handcuffed me
Speaker 2: so tightly my wrists were still marked and sore the
Speaker 2: next day. This shows the danger of deploying troops onto
Speaker 2: American streets. It puts all of our basic rights at risk.
Speaker 2: This is not a theory, this is a proven practice. Historically.
Speaker 2: ICE is mounting a mass surveillance campaign now on American
Speaker 2: citizens because again, they create the problem of open borders.
Speaker 2: It runs throughout the entire first Trump term as well.
Speaker 2: Biden escalates it even more, just in case you didn't
Speaker 2: notice the problem yet, and then they come around with
Speaker 2: their fake solutions. We need to have a police state.
Speaker 2: We need to have a digital ID so we know
Speaker 2: who the real citizens are, right, all the rest of
Speaker 2: this stuff, it's the one to two march of tyranny.
Speaker 2: Facial recognition algorithms, IRIS, scanning identification apps, controversial spyware on smartphones,
Speaker 2: and look, can we see this with TSA. First of all,
Speaker 2: we all know that nine to eleven was an inside job. Secondly,
Speaker 2: we all know that as bad as TSA is at
Speaker 2: their job, if there was really any terrorist threat at
Speaker 2: airports or against airplanes, there would have been many of
Speaker 2: them in the last twenty four years. But there haven't been.
Speaker 2: And so it's the dog that didn't bark that tells
Speaker 2: us that this is their agenda of enslavement. This is
Speaker 2: not about safety. As a matter of fact, as I've
Speaker 2: mentioned many times before, we had an individual who was
Speaker 2: when they rolled out the body scanners. He was an engineer.
Speaker 2: He protested against First of all, he showed how they
Speaker 2: could be defeated, and he did other protests and they
Speaker 2: brought charges against him. As part of his court case
Speaker 2: and as part of discovery, he was able to get
Speaker 2: some court documents. Now, they put a gag order on it,
Speaker 2: so he didn't talk about it. But the interesting thing
Speaker 2: was is that they accidentally published that information on the
Speaker 2: public website. I'm trying to remember now what it's called,
Speaker 2: but it's a public website pacer or something like that
Speaker 2: pace where they put post all the federal website, all
Speaker 2: the federal.
Speaker 4: Lawsuits pacercer Yeah, pacer dot gov.
Speaker 2: So they put up the unredacted version by mistake and
Speaker 2: left it up there for half a day, and we
Speaker 2: got a copy of that, and then they realized their
Speaker 2: mistake took it down and put up the redacted version,
Speaker 2: which is really nice of them to do that, because
Speaker 2: it showed us exactly what they didn't want us to know.
Speaker 2: And you know what exactly they didn't want us to
Speaker 2: know was that they'd said in twenty eleven, there is
Speaker 2: no threat. They go twenty eleven, there is no threat
Speaker 2: to airports or airplanes right now. And that was as
Speaker 2: they were rolling out these machines. That was as they
Speaker 2: were threatening the state of Texas, when they had the
Speaker 2: House unanimously say we don't want you doing this pat
Speaker 2: downs and naked body scans of kids. They threatened to
Speaker 2: turn Texas into a no flys on. So we'll just
Speaker 2: shut down all flights in Texas if you do that,
Speaker 2: And so then they got that shut down. When it
Speaker 2: went to the Texas Senate, the guy who was lieutenant
Speaker 2: governor was a former CIA guy that they had installed there.
Speaker 2: They made him unbelievably wealthy in the oil business. They
Speaker 2: set him up in the oil business and then got
Speaker 2: him into politics and so we knew all of that,
Speaker 2: and all this stuff is being done over fake, contrived problems,
Speaker 2: or real problems that were created by the government. So
Speaker 2: ICE is mounting a massive surveillance campaign on American citizens.
Speaker 2: Now this is from reason new technology threatens Americans free
Speaker 2: speech and their privacy. And of course we already have
Speaker 2: Flock out there, and they do mention the fact that
Speaker 2: ICE is using Flock. While a federal judge scrutinizes the
Speaker 2: constitutionality of tactics used by the federal immigration authorities during
Speaker 2: the ongoing protests in Chicago, these same agencies are quietly
Speaker 2: amassing behind the scenes surveillance technology for all Americans. And
Speaker 2: I always said these tactics will be used against everyone,
Speaker 2: backed by funding from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Speaker 2: passed in July, and we only had a couple of
Speaker 2: people like Thomas Massey who pushed back against that, and
Speaker 2: so Trump wants to get him out of there. Same
Speaker 2: with Tom Tillis. Tom Tillis didn't push back as far
Speaker 2: as I know, on the massive amounts of money being
Speaker 2: transferred to Israel for their benefit and against the benefit
Speaker 2: of the American people, but which Thomas Massey did, and
Speaker 2: he got. So there's a lot of Israeli billionaires who
Speaker 2: are trying to get him out of office. But Tom
Speaker 2: Tillis merely pushed back against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Speaker 2: So now he's has to retire. Not that I ever
Speaker 2: liked Tom Tillis, he was always a deep state guy anyway,
Speaker 2: But this bill was horrible. It was fiscally irresponsible, and
Speaker 2: we can see now what is happening with it. They
Speaker 2: have spent one hundred and four billion, I'm sorry, one
Speaker 2: point four billion dollars in new surveillance technology contracts, the
Speaker 2: highest amount in at least eighteen years, and so ICE
Speaker 2: is getting contracts with everybody to do facial recognition, IRIS scanning,
Speaker 2: controversial spyware on smartphones, and real time smartphone location and
Speaker 2: social media tracking systems. This is geospatial intelligence. This is
Speaker 2: where this has been for the longest time. I've said,
Speaker 2: you know, just before nine to eleven, that was what
Speaker 2: they began using the Internet and phones and things like
Speaker 2: that for. And that has been the fastest growing part
Speaker 2: of the intelligence agencies. And of course that's where Palleteer
Speaker 2: fits in as well. These contracts are in addition to
Speaker 2: any privately owned surveillance networks that ICE has access to.
Speaker 2: Flock Safety, for example, has allowed ICE to access over
Speaker 2: eighty thousand of its AI powered license plate reader cameras
Speaker 2: installed nationwide. The expansive and growing mass surveillance camera network
Speaker 2: captures the license plate number that make the model any
Speaker 2: distinctive features of all passing vehicles. In other words, you know,
Speaker 2: it looks to see if you've got a dent or
Speaker 2: scratch here or there and uses that as much as
Speaker 2: the license pipe, making it possible to track cars and
Speaker 2: by extension, drivers without a warrant. And they have this
Speaker 2: pretense that well, because it's being done by a private company,
Speaker 2: they can do whatever they want to with that data.
Speaker 2: So you're out in public and they can film you,
Speaker 2: but don't you dare try to film these ICE agents
Speaker 2: and what they're doing in public, but of course your
Speaker 2: open season. So they can film you. It's now their
Speaker 2: data whatever they filmed of you, and they can sell
Speaker 2: it to the government. And they do that because I
Speaker 2: know they've got a customer in the government, so they're
Speaker 2: doing it for the government. It's time that we shut
Speaker 2: down this legal pretense that's there. But the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: allowed this going back into the nineteen sixties. They said
Speaker 2: that the phone company, with all the data that they
Speaker 2: were collecting on the people who you called and who
Speaker 2: called you, and all the rest of this stuff, you
Speaker 2: can infer a lot of information from that. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, you can get about as much information
Speaker 2: from the metadata like that as you can from actually
Speaker 2: listening to the conversations. So the people sued to stop that,
Speaker 2: and the Supreme Court said, no, that data belongs to
Speaker 2: the phone company. They can do whatever they want to
Speaker 2: with it. That has established the precedent for all these
Speaker 2: companies on the Internet, companies that are like flock, that
Speaker 2: are recording you in physical space, and that needs to
Speaker 2: be overturned. I don't know who's going to push back
Speaker 2: against that. Nobody seems to be pushing back against it.
Speaker 2: The Trump administration has signaled that the technologies also be
Speaker 2: used in American citizens. Trump signed an executive order designating
Speaker 2: ANTIFAH a domestic terrorist organization and signaling the federal agencies,
Speaker 2: including ICE, should devote resources to investigating the network. And
Speaker 2: this is what the people we talked about yesterday, people
Speaker 2: holding up the signs, handwritten signs talking about this particular
Speaker 2: executive order and why they were putting things out there
Speaker 2: saying I am Antifa Antipha. They don't know what Antifa is,
Speaker 2: many of them when they were asked directly, but they
Speaker 2: do know that if the government, if the president can
Speaker 2: designate any organization and call it a terrorist organization. And
Speaker 2: both sides have been throwing this around. Conservatives were called
Speaker 2: terrorists because of January the sixth, and so both sides
Speaker 2: play this game. If they can arbitrarily label you as
Speaker 2: a terrorist or that any proof, without any due process,
Speaker 2: and now you are labeled as a terrorist, they can
Speaker 2: have given themselves the permission to do anything that they want.
Speaker 2: This is the one two step that Trump has been
Speaker 2: doing with everything. So why people call him a dictator
Speaker 2: of king, because all he has to do is say
Speaker 2: it's an emergency, or you're a terrorist, or these people
Speaker 2: are narco terrorists, so I can blow them up without
Speaker 2: any due process. I can just murder them in the water. Right.
Speaker 2: These are not theoretical things. They've been done. So in
Speaker 2: an interview with the Director of ICE, Glenn Beck was
Speaker 2: told that the agency would track the money, the ring
Speaker 2: leaders and professional agitators, etc. You know, it's interesting, Glenn
Speaker 2: Beck is not one of these people. Just like Alex Jones.
Speaker 2: They warn people about the coming police state. They warn
Speaker 2: people about these police state actions, and then when it
Speaker 2: comes they cheer it. Oh yeah, you're going to go
Speaker 2: after real bad guys. That's great. Well they'll go after
Speaker 2: some no bad guys, But then they're going to go
Speaker 2: after people who aren't really bad. That's the reality of
Speaker 2: all this stuff.
Speaker 3: Also, it's strange that they're having ICE investigate Antifa, Like,
Speaker 3: are they claiming that there's a lot of illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: in Antifa?
Speaker 2: Is this really.
Speaker 4: Within ICE's purview?
Speaker 3: Even if this is you know, I mean, going after
Speaker 3: the money that was funding the actual violence is one thing,
Speaker 3: but going after this is another thing. But even if
Speaker 3: you support going after Antiva, is ICE the agency that
Speaker 3: should be doing this?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well there is no Again, they start out with
Speaker 2: a mission, but then they're all just it's all really
Speaker 2: about coming after patriots, and it has been since the
Speaker 2: Patriot Act. It's not about people from other countries coming here.
Speaker 2: This is about coming after patriots. They have been laying
Speaker 2: the foundation for this and building for this step by step,
Speaker 2: and all these jurisdictional boundaries and everything were blurred intentionally
Speaker 2: by creating this umbrella of homeland security. So they put
Speaker 2: Homeland Security in there and it's oh, okay, So you know,
Speaker 2: we got all the law enforcement, federal law enforcement agencies
Speaker 2: runder Homeland Security. So if it doesn't belong to ICE,
Speaker 2: we'll just let them hand it off to somebody else
Speaker 2: because they're all under Homeland Security. So this is it's
Speaker 2: always been about Americans. It's been about a police state
Speaker 2: for Americans. We don't know if law enforcement or ICE
Speaker 2: are getting search warrants to deploy the spyware, said Electronic
Speaker 2: Privacy Information Center. I can tell you that they aren't.
Speaker 2: They said, it's a First Amendment issue. Your phone contains
Speaker 2: all communications, all your expressions, It has your contact lists,
Speaker 2: your social media, any political organizing that you might do. Look,
Speaker 2: the bottom line is that this stuff has been going
Speaker 2: on for a very long time. That's why we had
Speaker 2: PISA to start with. Why they had the Senate and
Speaker 2: the House hearings, the Church Committee hearings, and the Pike
Speaker 2: Committee hearings. It's always been about surveilling Americans, and so
Speaker 2: we have the Fourth Amendment which prohibited it, and then
Speaker 2: they did a watering down of the Fourth Amendment. The
Speaker 2: PISA Act, which then these people who are illegally smying
Speaker 2: on Americans used that as a way to give themselves
Speaker 2: legal cover to do dragnet search warrants on all Americans,
Speaker 2: Mister and missus Verizon, as Rampaul called it. So both
Speaker 2: PISA and the Fourth Amendment are treated as suggestions they
Speaker 2: do whatever they wish. Well, ICE agents stormed Manhattan's Chinatown
Speaker 2: like a war zone, grabbing vendors and protesters. They said,
Speaker 2: vendors known for selling counterfeit merchandise. Well, you know, it's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting for selling counterfeit merchandise. If a guy
Speaker 2: comes up in New York and he's got a hey man,
Speaker 2: you want to buy a watch, and he opens up
Speaker 2: his coat and he's got fifty rolexes in there, you
Speaker 2: might guess that they are copies, right, And so in
Speaker 2: a sense, when you look at this, this is like prohibition.
Speaker 2: You've got a willing buyer and a willing seller. The
Speaker 2: buyers know this stuff is counterfeit, and so you've got
Speaker 2: a willing trade here. And unlike drugs, I mean, nobody's
Speaker 2: going to be hurt with these counterfeit rolodexes, rolexes, rolodex
Speaker 2: so what I wear my arm of Rollodex. It's a
Speaker 2: little bit cumbersome, but you know, anyway, it's uh. The
Speaker 2: companies are defrauded, and so they might be there for that.
Speaker 2: But nevertheless, they said.
Speaker 4: It's another one of those things though, where the buyer
Speaker 4: of a real rolex and the buyer of a fake
Speaker 4: rolex are two completely different people. Rolexes business is not
Speaker 4: being harmed because somebody buys a dollar knockoff.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: They were never going to buy a roll in the
Speaker 4: first place, that's right.
Speaker 2: So they said that. The people that were there, though,
Speaker 2: that were watching it, others were truly amazed at the
Speaker 2: Gestapo tactics. They said, we saw this in real time,
Speaker 2: in real history, said a Manhattan resident. They just started
Speaker 2: grabbing people, putting them into vans. And I have to wonder,
Speaker 2: is this because of the three thousand arrests today quota
Speaker 2: that has been given to these guys. I know, we
Speaker 2: can get a bunch of people. Let's go to the
Speaker 2: market where they celebrent to knockoff counterfeits. And a Brooklyn resident,
Speaker 2: Edwin Jean, claimed to the Post that the officers had
Speaker 2: cuffed him when federal agents refused to when he refused
Speaker 2: to hand over his ID. This is America. I don't
Speaker 2: have to show you identity papers just for standing here
Speaker 2: on the corner. According to Jean, he became enraged and he
Speaker 2: started swearing at them. Well you're not allowed to talk
Speaker 2: back to them either. I'm not doing nothing. I'm from Brooklyn,
Speaker 2: he said. They asked me for my idea. I'm walking here,
Speaker 2: you're talking to me, and they asked me for my idea.
Speaker 2: I didn't give it to him, so they me The
Speaker 2: Post report. As of Tuesday evening, about one hundred people
Speaker 2: had gathered outside the Federal Plaza to protest the arrests.
Speaker 2: A News Nation correspondent was there, reported live from the scene,
Speaker 2: likening it to a war zone. Well, there you go.
Speaker 2: There's Trump's self fulfilling prophecy. Right. These places are war zones,
Speaker 2: or they will be soon once we get there. Now,
Speaker 2: all of this is playing into the hands of the
Speaker 2: guy Mom Donnie, who they say they don't want to
Speaker 2: have an office. This is the Marxist, Muslim, the communist
Speaker 2: that is there. But he will tell people the straight
Speaker 2: stuff about what is going on, and again allows him
Speaker 2: to say, once again, the Trump administration chooses authoritarian theatrics
Speaker 2: that create fear and not safety, and it has to stop.
Speaker 2: So they're just handing him some gifts here. Now, what
Speaker 2: do we do to actually make things better. We need
Speaker 2: a digital ID for all Americans so we can tell
Speaker 2: who's real citizens, so we can keep these people from
Speaker 2: taking our jobs. You know, a lot of the jobs
Speaker 2: people that are coming in from Mexico, they're taking a
Speaker 2: lot of labor jobs and things like that. You know,
Speaker 2: the highest paid jobs are going to the people coming
Speaker 2: in from India, and they're coming in because of the
Speaker 2: H one B visa thing. You want to see people
Speaker 2: taking the all the college graduates jobs, taking the engineering
Speaker 2: and computer science jobs. Those are people coming in from India,
Speaker 2: and they're doing it because it's H one B situation
Speaker 2: that the government put in. Now Trump, you know, this
Speaker 2: is one thing that I agree with that he did,
Speaker 2: but again it's got a massive loophole. They just had
Speaker 2: a when they announced this going into effect, they said
Speaker 2: went into effect September the twenty sixth, and when they
Speaker 2: talked about it, you know, he and Lutnik said, you know,
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand dollars a year. He emphasized that these
Speaker 2: companies are going to have to pay if they say
Speaker 2: they've got to bring in somebody from another country because
Speaker 2: we just don't have the brain power here in America.
Speaker 2: That's what Musk and Ramaswami were saying. And so they've
Speaker 2: got to bring in these Einsteins from India, and it's
Speaker 2: worth it for them to pay one hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 2: a year. They can do that. But the reality is
Speaker 2: there is a massive loophole that you can drive an
Speaker 2: army through with these fees that are there.
Speaker 3: We have the video of Trump talking about.
Speaker 2: The Yeah, go ahead and play that if you know
Speaker 2: where that is. I didn't get the number down on
Speaker 2: that one, but just let me know if you got it.
Speaker 2: So new regulations that exempt migrant students from Trump's one
Speaker 2: hundred thousand dollars fee on new HMB outsourcing workers. You see,
Speaker 2: big business and big college are working together to screw Americans.
Speaker 2: This is just another instance of it. And so they
Speaker 2: got an exception that was put in. And you know,
Speaker 2: there were press reports that Walmart was going to pull back.
Speaker 2: Now and you know, Walmart is not hiring Indians as
Speaker 2: greeters at the store. They're not using them for the
Speaker 2: lower level positions. They're hiring them for the back office
Speaker 2: jobs that are computer science and other things like that.
Speaker 2: So again they said, well, they're going to pull back
Speaker 2: on it, but will they An immigration lawyer or rather,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, An Indian migrant tweeted out huge immigration news.
Speaker 2: If you studied in the US, the Trump one hundred
Speaker 2: thousand dollars feet does not affect you. I'm now positive
Speaker 2: on this rule. An immigration lawyer also tweeted out massive loophole.
Speaker 2: If you come as a visitor, student, or other non
Speaker 2: immigrant visa, you don't need to pay the fee. By
Speaker 2: the way, it's interesting this immigration lawyer's name is Charles Kuck.
Speaker 2: How unfortunate, how how in insightful? They're right anyway, game
Speaker 2: changer for foreign grads, declared another Trump's one hundred thousand
Speaker 2: dollars H one bfee won't apply to students switching from
Speaker 2: H one to H one B inside the US current
Speaker 2: H one B holders extending their status. Any status changes
Speaker 2: happening domestically only affect new petitions for workers who are
Speaker 2: outside of the country. So again, this is maybe something
Speaker 2: of a headache, and.
Speaker 3: I'm sure that they could just get some quick lessons
Speaker 3: to apply for this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. So the way, you know, the real issue,
Speaker 2: the real, the biggest threat is this H one B program.
Speaker 2: Rather than shut it down, they put this fee on
Speaker 2: there to look like they're doing something and then they
Speaker 2: keep it going. You got okay, let's play that video
Speaker 2: where they talk about this.
Speaker 5: We need workers, we need grant workers, and there's pretty
Speaker 5: much ensures that that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 6: I think, John, you agree with it.
Speaker 5: Well, they're one hundred thousand dollars per year.
Speaker 7: So the whole idea is no more with these big.
Speaker 5: Tech companies or other big companies train foreign workers. They
Speaker 5: have to pay the government one hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 7: Then they have to pay the employee. So it's just
Speaker 7: non economic.
Speaker 5: If you're going to train somebody, you're going to train
Speaker 5: one of the recent graduates from one of the great
Speaker 5: universities across our land.
Speaker 7: Train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs.
Speaker 7: That's the policy here.
Speaker 5: One hundred thousand dollars a year for H one B visas.
Speaker 5: And all of the big companies are on board. We've
Speaker 5: spoken to them about the Golden Card.
Speaker 2: Love us. They love it, they really love it. They
Speaker 2: need it h one visa.
Speaker 8: Sometimes these play people already in the country legally on
Speaker 8: other visas or student visas. Does this apply to them
Speaker 8: or to renewals or does it only apply to people
Speaker 8: applying for the first time from.
Speaker 7: Abroad renewals first times.
Speaker 5: The company needs to decide do they want is the
Speaker 5: person valuable enough to have one hundred thousand.
Speaker 1: Dollars a year you avoted the question.
Speaker 5: Or they should head home and they should go hire
Speaker 5: an American. The whole idea it's annual, and it's for total.
Speaker 5: It can be a total of six years, so one
Speaker 5: hundred thousand dollars a year. So either the person is
Speaker 5: very valuable to the company and America, or they're going
Speaker 5: to depart and the company's going.
Speaker 7: To hire an American.
Speaker 5: And that's the point of immigration. Hire Americans and make
Speaker 5: sure that people coming in are the top top people.
Speaker 7: Stop the nonsense of.
Speaker 5: Letting people just come into this country on these visas
Speaker 5: that were given away for free.
Speaker 7: President is Chrystal.
Speaker 2: So the guy said, so what about the people already
Speaker 2: are here on a visa? What about the people who
Speaker 2: are students and so forth? That's the loophole. And you
Speaker 2: notice that lucky. Lutnik did not respond to that. Instead,
Speaker 2: he repeated what he said before. It's going to be
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand dollars a year. This is the way
Speaker 2: these people are doing. The bait and switch is how
Speaker 2: they lie right to your face. Many of the foreign
Speaker 2: graduates are hired for US jobs via ethnic networks that
Speaker 2: exclude American professionals. The foreign graduates are also aided by
Speaker 2: low wage, low tax loopholes and employment laws, so you
Speaker 2: can get a tax break for hiring these people. The
Speaker 2: government even rewards them financially. The result is that up
Speaker 2: to one half of new US tech graduates are being
Speaker 2: pushed out of their career tracks. The loophole also ensures
Speaker 2: that more US employers are likely to pick more US
Speaker 2: based foreign graduates. For the roughly one hundred and ten
Speaker 2: thousand new H one B visas that are handed out
Speaker 2: each year, there is no cap to the annual inflow
Speaker 2: of H one B. Many foreign students have begun looking
Speaker 2: elsewhere than the US market. Men. You are also trying
Speaker 2: to get into the UK, Germany or Irish universities, which
Speaker 2: also earn revenue by allowing foreign graduates to take jobs
Speaker 2: away from home country. Graduates. So in other words, this
Speaker 2: is all for the benefit of universities, all of this
Speaker 2: student stuff. Universities whether they're here, whether they're here or
Speaker 2: in the UK, or in Germany or Ireland, they get
Speaker 2: government subsidies for having these students in their universities, and
Speaker 2: so it's all being driven by them. These are the
Speaker 2: people that push Marxism and perversion in our society and
Speaker 2: they're trying to make sure that we don't have jobs
Speaker 2: as well. At least one million Indians have moved into
Speaker 2: the US white collar jobs via these various visa programs.
Speaker 2: Indian based Hindustan Time talked about this. I had some
Speaker 2: people who this is briibart. So they have people there
Speaker 2: who are saying, well, this is bad. I don't like
Speaker 2: having these new regulations and they're pushing back against even this.
Speaker 2: But again, even though there is this new law that
Speaker 2: appears to do something, there are easy ways to get
Speaker 2: around it. A number of Indians arriving in America on
Speaker 2: student visas fell by forty four and a half percent
Speaker 2: in August twenty twenty five compared to last year. July
Speaker 2: saw a similarly precipitous drop, with a number of arrivals
Speaker 2: dropping by roughly forty six percent, But the Trump administration
Speaker 2: is working to help these universities to help the universities
Speaker 2: subvert Americans. Applications to US business schools swamped this year
Speaker 2: as many international students worried about tighter visa restrictions and
Speaker 2: opted for schools closer to home. On September nineteenth, Trump
Speaker 2: announced the one hundred thousand dollars fee for people coming
Speaker 2: in at airports in twenty twenty six. He said some employers,
Speaker 2: using practices now widely adopted by entire sectors, have abused
Speaker 2: the H ONEB statue and its statute and its regulations
Speaker 2: to artificially suppressed wages, resulting in a disadvantageous labor market
Speaker 2: for American citizens. A number of foreign STEM workers in
Speaker 2: the US has more than doubled between two thousand and
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen, increasing from one point two million to almost
Speaker 2: two point five million. Well, that happened on his watch,
Speaker 2: his first watch, while overall STEM employment has only increased
Speaker 2: forty four and a half percent during that time, so
Speaker 2: it more than doubled. And yet even though it doubled,
Speaker 2: there was only about a forty four percent increase for
Speaker 2: Americans among computer and math occupations, the foreign share of
Speaker 2: the workforce grew from seventeen point seven percent in two
Speaker 2: thousand to twenty six point one percent in two thousand
Speaker 2: and ninety, and he was still there in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: The key facilitator for this influx of foreign stem labor
Speaker 2: has been the abuse of the H one B visa.
Speaker 2: So he didn't do anything about it the first time.
Speaker 2: They appear to be doing something about it this time.
Speaker 2: The question is there any is it really going to
Speaker 2: do anything? But this is the type of stuff they
Speaker 2: can and should be done rather than sending out the
Speaker 2: goons on the streets. So they need to do this
Speaker 2: but without the loopholes, and they need to do this
Speaker 2: without the gestapo tactics that are out there. Those have
Speaker 2: a completely different objective, just like when DeSantis and Florida
Speaker 2: use this to say, well, we're going to make everify
Speaker 2: mandatory now to get a job. They just want digital
Speaker 2: ID and these other people they want to have. The
Speaker 2: police that are going out in these different cities, they're
Speaker 2: just using the excuse of this problem that they created
Speaker 2: to have a federal police force, a militarized police force.
Speaker 2: So again when you look at the details of this,
Speaker 2: there's a massive loophole that you could I don't know,
Speaker 2: you could drive like an eighteen wheeler through it, especially
Speaker 2: if your name is Sing. We get one example of
Speaker 2: this thing. Every day. There seems like there's another massive
Speaker 2: accent with several people killed and the truck driver's name
Speaker 2: is Sing. I think we've got actually a picture. Here's
Speaker 2: one of an accident that's gonsed by an Indian truck driver.
Speaker 2: He's driving and he's cooking at the same time. Driving
Speaker 2: while cooking. Now, that's something that we don't have in
Speaker 2: the book, so I don't know if that's even against
Speaker 2: the law. Nobody thought of doing that. Look at that, Now,
Speaker 2: did he kill these people? I think this was the
Speaker 2: accident in California. I think there were three people killed
Speaker 2: in that so that he could cook while driving.
Speaker 3: It's such an amazing video. I've watched it a few times.
Speaker 3: Two of them in there that I had to watch
Speaker 3: a few times to make sure they weren't Ai.
Speaker 4: That's the type of thing you'd think somebody, uh no
Speaker 4: pun intended cooked up. Yeah, was a program to make
Speaker 4: Indians look bad, to be racist or something. Yeah, but
Speaker 4: no that's that's a reality.
Speaker 2: Apparently, Well, if you want to make them look bad,
Speaker 2: I got another one near this. This is the Indian
Speaker 2: poop throwing festival put up. I'm thinking he's sinking into it.
Speaker 2: I don't know what this is about, quite frankly, this
Speaker 2: is some religious thing that.
Speaker 4: They the British turning India back over to the Indians
Speaker 4: was the single worst thing to ever happen to India.
Speaker 1: Oh goodness wrong.
Speaker 4: Theres so much shit, so much ship like keep pushing.
Speaker 2: I don't know what the point of this says. Is
Speaker 2: this to worship the god of excrement or something of
Speaker 2: bowel movements? Did Trump have anything to do with this?
Speaker 2: Did he fly a jet over this or something?
Speaker 4: Or your mic isn't in this scene?
Speaker 2: Hey, he worked his way through. There you go again.
Speaker 2: You know, I almost have to wonder is that real
Speaker 2: or is that a I think that that's real.
Speaker 3: That's I've seen other videos where they take like a
Speaker 3: plate of calman and bring it into the kitchen and
Speaker 3: light on fire, saying oh it's good, uh, you know,
Speaker 3: for religious reasons, but then they also say it's anti
Speaker 3: microbial and all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Well, you've got a coalition of Labor Union's healthcare providers,
Speaker 2: because that's where a lot of these jobs are going
Speaker 2: as well. You know, you want to get a high
Speaker 2: paying job and the health care industry in technology, well
Speaker 2: there's a couple of Indians ahead of you for that job,
Speaker 2: and they'll take it for less. And of course university
Speaker 2: professors are pushing back against all this, but there is
Speaker 2: a massive loophole there. Trump is, by the way, calling
Speaker 2: off plans for a federal deployment to San Francisco. Maybe
Speaker 2: they got word that they had a lot of speakers there.
Speaker 2: They were ready to play the Imperial March trips got there.
Speaker 2: I guess that's one thing the city could do to
Speaker 2: protest it. The city could protest it. They got the
Speaker 2: network of loud speakers out there. Let's see what some
Speaker 2: people are saying here, Travis.
Speaker 4: All right, neuro divergent one, thank you very much for
Speaker 4: you appreciate it. Says here's something for the gas tank
Speaker 4: to keep the Miadia, the Miada of truth chugging along.
Speaker 4: Thank you, nights, God bless thank you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just to let you know, and I don't have
Speaker 2: the list here. I had put all this stuff together
Speaker 2: and updated the gas gauge, but I don't know we
Speaker 2: updated on the website, but we're at about just under
Speaker 2: sixty percent now. So appreciate all of your support. Thank you, yes,
Speaker 2: thank you all.
Speaker 4: Steve Evs says, my family hates me. Now, I've been
Speaker 4: anti Trump since late twenty seventeen. Story to hear that,
Speaker 4: Steve Evs.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know it's it's it's amazing. When we
Speaker 2: come back, I'm going to talk about you know, Trump
Speaker 2: has now had a reaction to the cattleman and others
Speaker 2: who criticized what he was doing with a beef industry
Speaker 2: and with Argentina. Truly is amazing. But you know, maybe
Speaker 2: I think your family's going to come around eventually. I
Speaker 2: think it's gonna be so obvious. Yes, we can hope.
Speaker 2: Nad Lander says. It's pretty bad when your own family
Speaker 2: is so programmed they disown you. So Bogus says, oh
Speaker 2: my goodness, I've literally done this except I played the
Speaker 2: imprival march for police during COVID. Good for you, good
Speaker 2: for you.
Speaker 4: Apparently they don't like that. Guard Goldsmith of Liberty Conspiracy,
Speaker 4: And of course you can find Guard Goldsmith Liberty Conspiracy
Speaker 4: on Rumble at six p m. And on Twitter at
Speaker 4: guard Goldsmith says, yes, they are grabbing license plate numbers
Speaker 4: and they are switching their own plates in Illinois each
Speaker 4: day on ice fans, Well.
Speaker 2: That's interesting. They got like those James Bond plates, right,
Speaker 2: they got four or five of them.
Speaker 4: Exc Stevens, did you ever think masked federal agents would
Speaker 4: be on the streets?
Speaker 2: Yes? Actually yes, And I'm not happy about it either.
Speaker 2: I'm not cheering it now, Like Alex and Glenn.
Speaker 4: Beckar Epstein Island says, it's funny how Info Wars never
Speaker 4: covers this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, isn't it, except that Alex does like the idea
Speaker 2: that we're going in and bullying Venezuela because hey, we've
Speaker 2: won a lot of wars down there. Let's go win
Speaker 2: one for the team, you know, Let's.
Speaker 4: We need a morale boost.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these people are a piece of cake. So I
Speaker 2: don't know real.
Speaker 4: Jason Barker says, you were not supposed to track a
Speaker 4: phone without a warrant. We got in deep doo doo
Speaker 4: for doing that to find an OP that was trying
Speaker 4: to commit suicide out in the woods. Saved his life,
Speaker 4: but we got in a lot of trouble yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, again, we have all kinds of laws prohibiting all
Speaker 2: kinds of things that they're doing, and they just ignore them.
Speaker 2: And so it's a matter of time before the guy
Speaker 2: who's the head of the deep state, the president, starts
Speaker 2: doing this on a very visible way because the agencies
Speaker 2: have on their own been ignoring the Constitution and specific
Speaker 2: prohibitions of things, and so now he's doing the same
Speaker 2: thing as well.
Speaker 4: The real Octo Spook says, right to privacy is definitely
Speaker 4: a unenumerated right and mentioned in the Bill of Rights.
Speaker 4: So Bogus military may be different, but an illegal search
Speaker 4: is not a crime by the cop. The only remedy
Speaker 4: is that the evidence found in the search cannot be
Speaker 4: used in court.
Speaker 2: Yeah. You know, when we talk about the right of
Speaker 2: a person to be secure and their person and their
Speaker 2: papers that time, that's what they're talking about. And those
Speaker 2: days they didn't have phones, they had papers, and so
Speaker 2: it's the same type of thing. It's all of your
Speaker 2: personal information that you keep about yourself, and nobody is
Speaker 2: pushing that point, not any of these privacy organizations either.
Speaker 4: So Boga says, yeah, I understand it is illegal, but
Speaker 4: it's not a crime by the cops, so there's no
Speaker 4: real disincentive.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean they never get punished.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean it is a big deal when evidence
Speaker 4: can't be used in a criminal case, if that is
Speaker 4: the only evidence of guilt. But that is rare. I'm
Speaker 4: already says my wrist Rolodex can't track me, real, Jason Barker.
Speaker 4: Walmart sells Chinese garbage that is usually ripped off for
Speaker 4: the IP. So they're going to start arresting Walmart greeterers. Now, maybe,
Speaker 4: just maybe, I'd be okay if they arrest that guy
Speaker 4: that demands to check my receipt. Leave me alone, buddy.
Speaker 4: I'm obviously not the target demographic.
Speaker 2: I haven't seen that for a while. They did that
Speaker 2: a lot in Austin. I haven't seen that at all
Speaker 2: here in Tennessee.
Speaker 4: I have only been in the Walmart around here twice.
Speaker 9: I think.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I have to say the same thing.
Speaker 4: Defy tyrants. Seventeen seventy six, Baron Trump is worth one
Speaker 4: hundred and fifty million dollars. His worth has increased by
Speaker 4: fifty million since his corrupt daddy took office in January
Speaker 4: twenty twenty five, fifty million made in nine months. Gee,
Speaker 4: I wonder how a nineteen year old kid does that.
Speaker 4: I'm sure he's just an investment genius.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, well maybe he's gotten some advice from his
Speaker 2: older brother in law, Jared, who's made billions.
Speaker 4: My advice is sell out to Israel. That's how you
Speaker 4: make a lot of money. Don't frag me, bro. You
Speaker 4: have one hundred cops and one is a criminal creating
Speaker 4: victims in the remaining ninety nine. Do not speak out
Speaker 4: and do not hold that one cop accountable, then you
Speaker 4: have one hundred bad cops.
Speaker 2: That's what Frank Ciperco always said. He said, you're always
Speaker 2: going to have bad people at any institution, not just
Speaker 2: the police, every institution. You're going to have bad people.
Speaker 2: So then the question is when the institution sees that,
Speaker 2: do they purge that person out or did they close
Speaker 2: ranks behind them? So you close ranks behind that person,
Speaker 2: Now they're all dirty, and that's what we've seen over
Speaker 2: and over again. So that's kind of the standard practice.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, it's thin blue line real. Jason Barker just
Speaker 4: goes to show how worthless most degrees are. Yeah, not
Speaker 4: as worthwhile an investment as they used to be. No,
Speaker 4: not at all. Don't frag me, bro Asian Indians are
Speaker 4: very compliant. India has been driving digital biometric idea for
Speaker 4: the last decade with very little pushback.
Speaker 2: Yeah, with Bill Gates, he wanted to make them, like
Speaker 2: one of his early beta test sites have a system
Speaker 2: called the Oddhar system. And especially at the lower end
Speaker 2: where they're very poor, they have to, you know, they're
Speaker 2: looking for handouts from the government, money, healthcare, other things
Speaker 2: like that. They got to take the number, and so
Speaker 2: they do.
Speaker 3: I think the reason India primarily was chosen for that
Speaker 3: is because they're already accustomed to a cast and that
Speaker 3: is what this will enforce and implement one way or
Speaker 3: the other. But they wouldn't have as much pushback because
Speaker 3: they're already accustomed to it in India.
Speaker 2: That's right. I guess, you know, I don't know why.
Speaker 2: I guess Bill Gates is a promin.
Speaker 4: I would consider Bill Gates the.
Speaker 2: Rest of Yeah, the rest of us are deplorable and untouchables.
Speaker 2: But when you look at that poop festival, maybe that's
Speaker 2: the untouchable idea.
Speaker 4: Yeah, if I was some upper class guy looking down
Speaker 4: at the peasants doing that, like no untouchable utterly untouchable.
Speaker 2: It's worse than.
Speaker 3: Any multi pythonly philp over here.
Speaker 4: Like I said, turning India back over to the Indians
Speaker 4: was the worst thing the British ever did to them.
Speaker 4: When we reconquer India, Gandhi will be a curse. His
Speaker 4: name will be stricken from the records.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Actually I liked his tactics, so I think that
Speaker 2: is the appropriate response, and I think that worked very
Speaker 2: well in East Germany as well. You know, this kind
Speaker 2: of thing, We'll let you show yourselves to be the
Speaker 2: bad guys, and you know, we'll just that was really
Speaker 2: what was that was what that priest who I don't
Speaker 2: agree with this politics or his religion, the one that
Speaker 2: was pepper sprayed in the face with a pepper ball,
Speaker 2: hitting it, shot in the face with a pepper ball.
Speaker 2: What he was saying, and they tried to make it
Speaker 2: sound like he was threatening them. He said, if they're
Speaker 2: going to hammer us, we will be the anvil. And
Speaker 2: so you know that's the picture that Guta put out there.
Speaker 2: You're either hammer or anvil, you know, can you take
Speaker 2: the blows? The anvil is not doing any action, The
Speaker 2: anvil is not striking back. The anvil is just taking
Speaker 2: the blows and remaining and that was basically Gandhi's approach. Yeah, so.
Speaker 4: He made a mistake. All I'm saying Gandhi has was
Speaker 4: a net negative phrase idea opossum king. President Trump reveals
Speaker 4: an anonymous billionaire side to check for one hundred and
Speaker 4: thirty million to keep the military paid black budgets to
Speaker 4: pay our military private mercenaries.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, we'll see when we come back. We're going
Speaker 2: to take a look at Trump pushing back against the
Speaker 2: people who dared to criticize him for what he's doing,
Speaker 2: putting Argentina first. So we're going to take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us, joy listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: The common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common Past to track and control us,
Speaker 2: their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and create
Speaker 2: it in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 2: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us. While they hide everything from us,
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 10: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 10: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 10: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 10: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 10: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 10: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
Speaker 10: he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
Speaker 10: American suckers can buy me some at the David knightshow
Speaker 10: dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Speaker 10: Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd
Speaker 10: wear something other than green military cosplay to.
Speaker 7: My various gallas and social events.
Speaker 10: If you want to save on shipping, just put it
Speaker 10: in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
Speaker 10: the USA.
Speaker 2: Looking back, we have an interesting turn of a phrase
Speaker 2: here on the view. They were criticizing Trump because of
Speaker 2: the extravagant two hundred and fifty million dollar ballroom that
Speaker 2: he is building. That seems to be his top priority.
Speaker 2: That was when people asking about Charlie Kirk. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: pretty bad, but I'll tell you about my ballroom. You know,
Speaker 2: that is his focus. It's about building this monument to himself,
Speaker 2: this garish monument which nobody really needs. We haven't needed
Speaker 2: it for a couple hundred years now, but we need
Speaker 2: it now. And so as they were talking about this,
Speaker 2: you had Alissa Farah Griffin began by talking about, you know,
Speaker 2: the situation's happening in America and how he's really not
Speaker 2: taking care of business for Americans, and then Joy Behart said,
Speaker 2: you know, I keep thinking about the French Revolution and
Speaker 2: the expression to let them eat cake type of thing,
Speaker 2: and then started talking about what's going on with the
Speaker 2: farmers and Argentina being put as a first priority. Beef
Speaker 2: is high, so people can't afford it. So what we're
Speaker 2: going to do is we're going to subsidize Argentina to
Speaker 2: do the beef. I mean, this is outsourcing the bad
Speaker 2: aspects of federal subsidies on industries. Now we're going to
Speaker 2: outsource and subsidize our foreign favorite politicians that are out there,
Speaker 2: And so I said, this seems like a kind of
Speaker 2: a let them eat cake moment. He's building his two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty million dollar ballroom, he's writing a check
Speaker 2: to himself for two hundred and thirty million dollars, and
Speaker 2: the star of the farmers are going out of business
Speaker 2: one out of every three farmers in Arkansas, as well
Speaker 2: as the cattleman one organization after the others. I read
Speaker 2: to you, I think it was yesterday. We're saying what
Speaker 2: he's doing is he's creating chaos in the markets. It's
Speaker 2: not just that he's giving forty billion dollars to Argentina
Speaker 2: and not helping the farmers that he has directly harmed
Speaker 2: with his tariff tantrums. He's completely ignoring them. But it's
Speaker 2: even worse when he brings in the beef than What
Speaker 2: that does is that depresses prices for the farmers, for
Speaker 2: the ranchers, and it's creating chaos in our marketplace. We
Speaker 2: need to have stability, not chaos, and we need to
Speaker 2: not have the central planning of the federal government coming
Speaker 2: in with all of this stuff. And as I said,
Speaker 2: it's essentially why they went to the great trouble and
Speaker 2: great expense of creating the Chicago Board of Trade. They
Speaker 2: want to know what the price of their agricultural product
Speaker 2: is going to be in a few months when it
Speaker 2: is ready to harvest, and that allows them to have
Speaker 2: a fixed price in the future that they can target
Speaker 2: for so they can budget around that. They need to
Speaker 2: have transparency, they need to have market pricing, they need
Speaker 2: to have stability instead what Trump is giving them, like
Speaker 2: he's giving everybody with all this tariff stuff, all the
Speaker 2: tariff stuff is about creating a kind of chaos that
Speaker 2: nobody in any business can handle. It doesn't matter whether
Speaker 2: you are manufacturing, or whether you're farming, or whether you're
Speaker 2: a retailer. You can't handle the kind of chaos that
Speaker 2: Trump is putting in with a tariffs. We like it
Speaker 2: or not, we have an economy that has been intertwined
Speaker 2: with these other economies and it's just like sewing something
Speaker 2: together with embroidery. You just can't rip that out. You're
Speaker 2: going to rip out the fabric as well. And so
Speaker 2: if he wants to rip out what has been embellished
Speaker 2: and embroidered on the fabric of society for decades with
Speaker 2: this open trade stuff. If he wants to just take
Speaker 2: that out all at once, he's going to rip the
Speaker 2: heart out of the fabric of our society. And that
Speaker 2: is what he's doing, and every segment, that's what he's doing.
Speaker 2: So these farmers, as I said, these ranchers, Kettleman associations,
Speaker 2: all began by saying, we really love President Trump, and
Speaker 2: we really appreciate what he's doing for the country. But
Speaker 2: this chaos and this instability is killing us, and you've
Speaker 2: got to do something to stop that. Well, how dare
Speaker 2: them criticize Trump? He came out and fought back against
Speaker 2: them because they dared to criticize him for destroying their markets.
Speaker 2: Trump took aim at the cattle ranchers amid industry backlash
Speaker 2: to his plan to purchase b from Argentina to stabilize
Speaker 2: that industry in lower costs for Americans. The cattle ranchers,
Speaker 2: who I love soe he loves them as well. But
Speaker 2: this is like a spat. You know, darling, I really
Speaker 2: love you, you know, bless your heart. They're yelling at each other,
Speaker 2: the husband and wife. But anyway, I don't understand that.
Speaker 2: The only reason they don't understand that the only reason
Speaker 2: they're doing so well for the first time in decades
Speaker 2: is because I put teriffs on cattle coming into the
Speaker 2: United States, including a fifty percent tariff on Brazil. But again,
Speaker 2: this is all it's chaotic, it's constantly changing, and he's
Speaker 2: going to reward one country and punish another Country's going
Speaker 2: to reward one industry and punish another one. He's going
Speaker 2: to reward one company and punish another one. Who is
Speaker 2: he to pick winners and losers like that? He has
Speaker 2: completely rejected the marketplace. This guy, supposedly the first businessman
Speaker 2: we've had, doesn't care a whit about the marketplace. He
Speaker 2: acts like a king, and he's he's not a businessman.
Speaker 2: He's a failed casino owner. If it weren't for me,
Speaker 2: they would be doing just as they've done for the
Speaker 2: past twenty years.
Speaker 1: Terrible.
Speaker 2: It'd be nice if they would understand that. But they
Speaker 2: have also got to get their prices down because the
Speaker 2: consumer is a very big factor in my thinking. Also,
Speaker 2: So there you go, How dare them? Don't they realize
Speaker 2: that they're nothing Without Trump, none of us are. He
Speaker 2: is the be all and end all of everything, and
Speaker 2: don't pay any attention to what is actually going on
Speaker 2: out there. As he starts one war after the other,
Speaker 2: as he pushes us into war with China, as he
Speaker 2: continues and funds the war with Ukraine and Russia, as
Speaker 2: he is moving for regime change in Venezuela and blowing
Speaker 2: people out of the water. He wants us to believe
Speaker 2: that he's the peace president. So his terrafs exposed contradictions
Speaker 2: in his trade policy, says reason Trump wants higher beef prices,
Speaker 2: but he also wants lower beef prices. And see, the
Speaker 2: double think begins at the top, and it goes down
Speaker 2: to the people who follow him. These are mutually exclusive things.
Speaker 2: You can't have them. Maybe what he should do is
Speaker 2: have some confidence in the marketplace. That is what made
Speaker 2: America prosperous and free, you know. And this goes back
Speaker 2: to the thinking of the people around him, people like
Speaker 2: Lutnik and Bessent, the Soros guy, as well as Peter Navarro,
Speaker 2: the Democrat. These people believe that, and they said this
Speaker 2: when they started putting the tariffs on America. Was great.
Speaker 2: We had terraffs. It wasn't the teriffs that made a
Speaker 2: great It was the freedom that we had and the
Speaker 2: low tax rates and the low government spending, and the
Speaker 2: government that was out of our lives. In terms of regulation,
Speaker 2: they have regulated American business to death and they're continuing
Speaker 2: to do that. So America hurts farmers and discounts China's
Speaker 2: soy imports while providing a crutch for Argentina. This is
Speaker 2: mess dot org and they're exactly right. This is what
Speaker 2: happens when you have central planning and the planning is
Speaker 2: all based around who he likes. Well, we have a
Speaker 2: guest who's going to be joining us now, and he's
Speaker 2: on the line. So I'm going to cut it right
Speaker 2: here without getting into this any further, and we're going
Speaker 2: to be talking about a way to catch up on
Speaker 2: what is going on locally. It's getting increasingly difficult to
Speaker 2: do that, and we have, you know, most of the
Speaker 2: news that's focused on things that are happening nationally, especially
Speaker 2: because the national government is putting its tentacles into everything
Speaker 2: that we do locally. But as you know, I truly
Speaker 2: believe that the solutions are local, and in order to
Speaker 2: have solutions locally. We have to know what's going on locally,
Speaker 2: and the local news, if it exists in most cases,
Speaker 2: is being controlled by some large corporation that has a
Speaker 2: control of these news organizations that are locally set up.
Speaker 2: They are part of a network that is national and
Speaker 2: so they're part of pushing the national agenda and it's
Speaker 2: difficult to get any honest reporting with that. Well, we
Speaker 2: have a way to get around this, and I've talked
Speaker 2: to Sam Anthony in the past about your News dot
Speaker 2: Com and so we're going to talk about a system
Speaker 2: that he's set up that is hyperlocal. Is something that
Speaker 2: you might actually be interested in doing in terms of
Speaker 2: filing your own reports and monetizing your reporting. You can
Speaker 2: do that through his website. So we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break and we're going to be right back
Speaker 2: with Sam Anthony. We're going to talk about your News
Speaker 2: dot com. Uh, stay with us, We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: If I can hit this thing here, there we go.
Speaker 7: H m hm m hm, m m h.
Speaker 2: M.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass aps radio
Speaker 11: has you covered check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 11: on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 12: Right.
Speaker 2: Joining us now is Sam Anthony of yournews dot com. Again,
Speaker 2: a hyperlocal news content distribution platform. It's also a way
Speaker 2: that you can monetize your reporting locally, and I think
Speaker 2: this is really vital. I think it's vital for us
Speaker 2: to have an independent media. I think it's vital for
Speaker 2: us to have local information. And I think that all
Speaker 2: politics is ultimately local, even though we have to understand
Speaker 2: what the national and the global agenda is. That's the
Speaker 2: context for it and that's where it's coming out. But
Speaker 2: the way that you stop it is going to be locally,
Speaker 2: I think. So joining us now is Sam Anthony. Thank
Speaker 2: you for joining us.
Speaker 7: Sam David, great to be here, Good to see you again.
Speaker 2: Good to see you. Tell us a little bit about
Speaker 2: your news dot com. It's been a while since we talked.
Speaker 7: Yeah, and by the way, a lot has changed.
Speaker 13: But I mean in terms of you know, our growth,
Speaker 13: we've been expanding and growing every day. So for your audience,
Speaker 13: your news dot com is a hyperlocal news platform, so
Speaker 13: it would look like a news website, but we're in
Speaker 13: every city in the United States, so what we have
Speaker 13: is massive scale. We could serve news to a city,
Speaker 13: to a county, to a market, state, regional, or national.
Speaker 13: The model is really the exact replication of the physical world,
Speaker 13: like how the media industry works, minus all the print
Speaker 13: and distribution costs, and it allows the public to interact
Speaker 13: and share in the narrative locally and in essence put
Speaker 13: the power of the press back in the hands that
Speaker 13: the people where it belongs.
Speaker 7: That's that's the short version.
Speaker 2: That's great. So people go to New York News dot
Speaker 2: com and then I guess they can put in their
Speaker 2: zip code and you'll connect them with that. Is that
Speaker 2: how it works from the.
Speaker 13: Not only do we have local news, we have national news,
Speaker 13: and we're expanding and growing daily. We're onboarding news reporters
Speaker 13: every single day. So it just keeps getting bigger and
Speaker 13: bigger and bigger. And by the way, the reason for
Speaker 13: that is, I don't know if you know the statement,
Speaker 13: but on you know, I get all my content creators
Speaker 13: or many of them from people that were part of
Speaker 13: the you know, the they were displaced in the media
Speaker 13: industry because they of all the layoffs.
Speaker 7: Right, So there's roughly a half.
Speaker 13: A million people on LinkedIn that call themselves freelance journalists.
Speaker 13: There's a couple hundred thousand students that came out of
Speaker 13: school and they have nowhere to go. So you know,
Speaker 13: there's nobody hiring in the space. So for me, this
Speaker 13: is this is our platform is a natural migration and
Speaker 13: so that's what's happening. So we're starting to onboard people,
Speaker 13: a lot of them. Currently, by the way, we have
Speaker 13: over five thousand news reporters, a little over fifty three hundred.
Speaker 2: Wow. I think it really is going to explode because
Speaker 2: the big guys are consolidating rapidly. You know, you look
Speaker 2: at the Ellison family. They're pulling together print media, they're
Speaker 2: pulling together TV, the social media, Internet as well as
Speaker 2: the Hollywood films. I mean, they're going for every bit
Speaker 2: of communication. And then a lot of these people are
Speaker 2: replacing reporters with AI. So somebody wants to get some
Speaker 2: real honest reporting on the ground. I mean, that's going
Speaker 2: to be the wave of the future, I think completely.
Speaker 13: So you know, remember back in the in the eighties,
Speaker 13: there was over five hundred independent news outlets. Today David,
Speaker 13: they're six.
Speaker 7: Okay, it was all it.
Speaker 13: Was all consolidated. So not for nothing. But if you
Speaker 13: want to know why we're in the mess we're in today.
Speaker 13: It's because of the media and because you know, because
Speaker 13: it's centralized news. Right, everybody's seen the Sinclair Broadcasting videos
Speaker 13: where you had those you know, thirty or forty TV
Speaker 13: saying the same thing at the same time, right, Well,
Speaker 13: you have to know it came from corporate. They're just
Speaker 13: reading a teleproblem. Yeah, so all that you know, and
Speaker 13: by the way, I'm going to give you some other stance.
Speaker 2: And it's not finished. It's not going to be you know,
Speaker 2: it's not going to stay at six. It's going to
Speaker 2: come down to one and two or something like that.
Speaker 13: That it's going to go to zero. I don't think
Speaker 13: it's going to be around more than another four or
Speaker 13: five years. And the reason the reason I say that
Speaker 13: is I'm going to give you the exact answer. Do
Speaker 13: you remember around you know, eighty eight, eight to nineties,
Speaker 13: those early nineties, you know that television news reached over
Speaker 13: fifty percent of the population, right, somebody tuned into some
Speaker 13: station at some point in time.
Speaker 7: Do you know what the daily numbers are? Now?
Speaker 2: No, what are they?
Speaker 7: I'm going to tell you what they are.
Speaker 13: This is for every single news network combined CNN, ABC,
Speaker 13: NPCMSNBC two and a half million daily. It's literally less
Speaker 13: than one percent. And here's the reason. In nineteen ninety
Speaker 13: what options did we have?
Speaker 7: Four? Okay, that was it. Today there's forty million of them.
Speaker 13: You ever go to YouTube, We're going to rumble, that's right.
Speaker 7: So it's options. You ever go to TikTok Instagram?
Speaker 13: So you know, as I tell people, YouTube is a
Speaker 13: created a technology where anybody could be a broadcaster.
Speaker 7: And there's only two things that are going to happen.
Speaker 7: You're either going to sink or swim.
Speaker 13: Either the public likes what you do or they don't,
Speaker 13: and then you get monetized and you could earn.
Speaker 7: Some money off of it. And what I do is
Speaker 7: we do local news reporting.
Speaker 13: That's my niche, right because we do we can do
Speaker 13: the city council meeting in one city, well, that would
Speaker 13: be politics news for that city. But we provide a
Speaker 13: technology where anybody can become a news reporter.
Speaker 7: We call them citizen journalists.
Speaker 13: Now, keep in mind, most of the people we have
Speaker 13: are all seasoned veterans, but that doesn't mean that somebody
Speaker 13: that's a soccer mom in some city that is proactive
Speaker 13: in the community that everybody knows and trust.
Speaker 7: Can't become your next news reporter, because if you're.
Speaker 13: Already going to the high school football game or to
Speaker 13: city council meeting or school board meetings, why not report
Speaker 13: the news and share it with the community and make money.
Speaker 13: That's where it's all That's where it's all headed. I mean,
Speaker 13: this is a no brainer. Everything is moving to platforms. Okay,
Speaker 13: so you have two and a half million people on
Speaker 13: all networks combined, but yet YouTube has two billion.
Speaker 2: People and the problem was the problem with YouTube is
Speaker 2: that they've got their thumb on the scale in terms
Speaker 2: of what the content that they want to go out there.
Speaker 2: They will hide certain content and they'll promote other content.
Speaker 2: So how do you operate with that? How does that
Speaker 2: operate so that people know there's no censorship on your platform?
Speaker 13: So we are a free speech platform, there won't be
Speaker 13: any censorship. We do not fact check a thing, and
Speaker 13: the reason for that is we're not in the news business.
Speaker 7: I'm in the platform business.
Speaker 13: So as I'm going to ask you this question, David,
Speaker 13: as somebody who's broadcasting news, you have an audience of
Speaker 13: people that trust you, correct, they like you if you
Speaker 13: lied to them, how fast would it take for them
Speaker 13: to figure it out and leave you.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, that's an interesting thing because I said
Speaker 2: that to Alex about the stop the Steels thing. I said,
Speaker 2: you know, Alex, all you've got is your credibility. If
Speaker 2: you blow that on this, you tell people that they
Speaker 2: got twenty thousand people out there arresting people, I said,
Speaker 2: they're going to walk away from you. Of course that
Speaker 2: didn't happen. But that's the unfortunate thing that I've learned
Speaker 2: is that people can still support someone who is lying
Speaker 2: to them, even after they realize that they've been lied to. So,
Speaker 2: but I think you're right. I think it is very
Speaker 2: important to have that credibility, and I think that that
Speaker 2: is the consumer Many consumers will look for that. Not
Speaker 2: all of them, well a lot of them will just
Speaker 2: you know, they'll take something no matter how absurd it is,
Speaker 2: and we'll run with it. But I agree with you
Speaker 2: in general that the marketplace has to be the one
Speaker 2: to decide what is genuine and what is not. We
Speaker 2: can't have any minders who are doing that. We can't
Speaker 2: have the government doing it, we can't have the platforms
Speaker 2: doing it. And of course, if you really stand with
Speaker 2: free speech, you've got the section two thirty which said,
Speaker 2: you know, we're not going to censor people because they
Speaker 2: are just a platform, and we're not going to hold
Speaker 2: them responsible for the content that they put out. And
Speaker 2: we have governments who are constantly trying to get around
Speaker 2: that and hold people responsible for the content they put
Speaker 2: out and trying to make them into their government sensors
Speaker 2: and say well, hey, it's not coming from us, it's
Speaker 2: coming from them. But it actually is coming from them.
Speaker 2: So we saw the big guys doing that. But kudos
Speaker 2: to you for keeping a free speech platform. That is essential,
Speaker 2: and it's very very essential for the local level as well.
Speaker 2: It's really hard to get that information on a local
Speaker 2: level because you've got to have a lot of people
Speaker 2: who are out there. You know. This, this basically brings
Speaker 2: that together. There's there's it's hard to get a marketplace
Speaker 2: for local news because if you get too hyper local,
Speaker 2: then you know, how do you find that audience. Well,
Speaker 2: the way that you find it is through your news
Speaker 2: dot com.
Speaker 13: Right, And I'm basically a platform. The marketplace decides what
Speaker 13: kind of content they want to read. Right, So we're
Speaker 13: a daily Just think of me as a Miami Herald
Speaker 13: or Chicago Tribune just on steroids, with the ability for
Speaker 13: the public to interact and contribute and post their own news, views, opinions,
Speaker 13: and classified So the second piece to this is, you
Speaker 13: know YouTube has a monetization model, Rumble has a monetization
Speaker 13: x as a monetization Facebook has a monetization So we
Speaker 13: have a monetization model for people that do news reporting
Speaker 13: where they could submit their work and then share in
Speaker 13: the ad rhythm. So again I'm the platform. But by
Speaker 13: the way, David, this is where it's all going. The
Speaker 13: future of news will be a hyper local news platform,
Speaker 13: most likely global, with a social component where you know,
Speaker 13: you could have everybody be able to contribute to the
Speaker 13: narrative and put the power to press.
Speaker 7: In the hands of the people.
Speaker 13: It'll have a monetization model for content creators that do
Speaker 13: this just for a living where they can make money off
Speaker 13: of their content, and a self service ad platform. Somebody
Speaker 13: could buy an ad, target it to one zip code,
Speaker 13: neverwhere in between. So it's you know the scale here.
Speaker 13: Everybody's been to a news website, so you you know,
Speaker 13: there's like a sports page, right, So however, many ads
Speaker 13: that Miami Herald can put on their sports page. We
Speaker 13: could do in one zip code, So it's literally like
Speaker 13: having seventy thousand times their inventory. There's the scale and
Speaker 13: ads are on a best bid basis. So what we've
Speaker 13: created is a model that is truly advertisers support.
Speaker 2: That's great, that's great, that's.
Speaker 7: What we've made here. So this is the go ahead.
Speaker 2: Well, let's let's talk a little bit because I've got
Speaker 2: a lot of people in my audience that have they're
Speaker 2: they're very engaged and they do a lot of their
Speaker 2: own research. Many of them have started their own platforms
Speaker 2: other places. What does it look like for them if
Speaker 2: they want to come on and start doing reports there
Speaker 2: and get monetized on your platform, yournews dot com.
Speaker 13: So if they if they're doing news, if they want
Speaker 13: to do news reporting, we monetize that. So the way
Speaker 13: that they would do that is they go to your
Speaker 13: news dot com, scroll to the bottom of the page.
Speaker 13: There's something that says become a citizen journalist. You could
Speaker 13: click that link and you could fill out the application.
Speaker 13: There's a couple of videos you could watch that are short.
Speaker 13: But if somebody's just interested in, like we have a
Speaker 13: lot of pr firms and nonprofits that leverage us. You know,
Speaker 13: maybe the cancer societies having a five K run, or
Speaker 13: some lawyer just made partner in Boston. You know, that's
Speaker 13: a business story in Boston. But those are not monetized.
Speaker 13: So we also have at the top of the pay
Speaker 13: just submit your news, because some people like to post
Speaker 13: classifieds or opinions or stuff like that. But the journalist
Speaker 13: thing is for people that want to become journalists and
Speaker 13: they want to report news in the community, not report opinions.
Speaker 7: Right, There's no shortage of that.
Speaker 13: So if you're at the school, at the school board
Speaker 13: media or a high school football game and you want
Speaker 13: to report it, that's what that is for.
Speaker 2: M and we had a lot of people who do
Speaker 2: that all the time. They just typically put it up
Speaker 2: for free on social media, and then we got a
Speaker 2: lot of professionals who will go out there and just
Speaker 2: scrape through the reports that are put up there for
Speaker 2: free compile them into an article. I've seen that done
Speaker 2: by a lot of people that I know that that's
Speaker 2: the way they put the stuff together. But of course,
Speaker 2: you know, people could do that and get monetized on
Speaker 2: yournews dot com if they want to go somewhere talk
Speaker 2: about classifieds. How does that operate?
Speaker 7: People?
Speaker 13: Could you know, click submit news and they could create
Speaker 13: an account and they could post the classified it's free.
Speaker 2: Oh it's free. Okay, well that's cool. Yeah, so you
Speaker 2: can sell local stuff there as well. Yeah, people, it's
Speaker 2: away for people to get away from the Facebook marketplace.
Speaker 7: It's another alternative. I mean, don't forget those.
Speaker 13: You know, those have been dominated by Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace.
Speaker 7: So we have another platform as we because I do get.
Speaker 13: Classifieds in all over the United States, but not like
Speaker 13: I get news stories because that's our niche is the
Speaker 13: local news. So we bring in, David about two thousand
Speaker 13: stories a day, two thousand I mean a week. Sorry,
Speaker 13: we bring in a couple thousand articles a week. But
Speaker 13: we keep growing, so you know, imagine when it gets
Speaker 13: to ten thousand and then you know, fifteen and twenty
Speaker 13: thousand news reporters, you know, you're really going to start
Speaker 13: to see tons of content coming in. And that's what
Speaker 13: this is all about. It's just what ultimately, at the
Speaker 13: end of the day, what we do will become the
Speaker 13: next mainstream media because the legacy media is it's just
Speaker 13: an antiquated product. It's not going to survive. Some people
Speaker 13: say it's not going to survive because they're lying. Has
Speaker 13: absolutely nothing to do with it. It's because the younger
Speaker 13: generation doesn't con information that way. They consume it differently.
Speaker 13: And by the way, I don't know if you saw
Speaker 13: aad Week's numbers for mainstream media, but the age demographic
Speaker 13: that's between twenty five and fifty four, the first quarter,
Speaker 13: which is January February March, total viewership for that age
Speaker 13: group over every network was five hundred thousand people total
Speaker 13: over three months.
Speaker 7: Wow. Essentially zero.
Speaker 13: And so you know, I mean, I have my neighbors.
Speaker 7: They're in their eighties, eighty three years old, I think
Speaker 7: they are.
Speaker 13: And they watch CNN, Okay, so they believe everything that
Speaker 13: networks are telling them because they've grown up watching it, right,
Speaker 13: this is all they've ever had. So they don't get Internet,
Speaker 13: they don't you know, they have flip phones, they don't watch,
Speaker 13: they don't turn into tune into rumble or YouTube. All
Speaker 13: the stuff they get is from the network television stations.
Speaker 13: So they're always shocked when something happens, you know.
Speaker 7: Because CNN is not reporting it.
Speaker 14: So you know, now CNN saying that, you know, Letitia
Speaker 14: James is really you know, she's being railroaded, right, so
Speaker 14: even though she signed it, they're going to bypass that
Speaker 14: to say this is just Trump going after It's crazy,
Speaker 14: but all that is eventually is going to be gone.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. They grew up on Walter Crinkite and he'd
Speaker 2: say every night and that's the way it is. And
Speaker 2: they believe that what he was telling them was the
Speaker 2: way that it was, and they didn't realize that he's
Speaker 2: getting a feed from the CIA exactly. Very interesting. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, I do think that that is the way
Speaker 2: that it's going to go, and clearly we need to
Speaker 2: have this kind of decentralization and local reporting. I'm sure
Speaker 2: that there's a way sens is on the computer that
Speaker 2: people can filter by a particular topic or keyword or
Speaker 2: something to pick up these reports as well, right if
Speaker 2: they're looking to find information about what's happening on school
Speaker 2: boards or something like that, because we see a lot
Speaker 2: of local reporting about school boards that they could find
Speaker 2: and all the different local reports about school boards and
Speaker 2: that type of thing.
Speaker 13: So it's set up like a news website, sports, business, politics, entertainment, world.
Speaker 7: I got hockey, soccer.
Speaker 13: Basketball, golf, So all you do is select the topic
Speaker 13: you want to read and if like you hate golf,
Speaker 13: you don't click it, okay. And so if you want
Speaker 13: politics for your area, it's local politics, that's it, and
Speaker 13: then that'll serve up the information because content is assigned
Speaker 13: to a subject, which would be a sports, business, politics,
Speaker 13: and then a geography which could be a city or
Speaker 13: a county or a market or state, regional, or national.
Speaker 7: So it's all based on geographical relevance.
Speaker 13: So obviously somebody's little league game is sports news for
Speaker 13: that city, but the high school football game is sports
Speaker 13: news for the market.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 13: And the markets, by the way, we defined by television database,
Speaker 13: like New York is number one, LA's number two, Chicago's
Speaker 13: number three.
Speaker 7: That thing, there's two hundred and ten of them.
Speaker 2: So if you're going to go through and you're going
Speaker 2: to look for news and politics, does show you your
Speaker 2: local stuff first? And then does if you keep looking
Speaker 2: down the feed you start getting into a wider and
Speaker 2: wider geographical areas and how that works, so all.
Speaker 13: The news is served to you based on geographical relevance.
Speaker 13: So if it's something that Trump did, its national news
Speaker 13: it'll just appear in all zip codes. And I don't
Speaker 13: know if you want me to share my screen, but
Speaker 13: I could just show real quick.
Speaker 1: Sure, yeah, yeah you want to do that?
Speaker 13: Yeah yeah, So this way, it's so much easier just
Speaker 13: to see it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think people like to see that. We had
Speaker 2: a video that you have that introduces it, but we
Speaker 2: had an issue playing it. So yeah, if you could
Speaker 2: just show the screen, that'd be great.
Speaker 7: Yeah, this won't take long. You have to I'm going
Speaker 7: to send a request. You have to open me up
Speaker 7: to share.
Speaker 2: Okay, you got that lance. Okay, he's working on it.
Speaker 2: That's okay.
Speaker 13: Okay, here it is, So you tell me when you
Speaker 13: see what I'm looking at. We got it, okay. So
Speaker 13: mine says Palm City, Florida. So GEO locates me. If
Speaker 13: you lived in Houston, it would open to Houston. So
Speaker 13: this website looks like a news website, correct, Yeah, And
Speaker 13: so I'm going to mouse over national news. There's your topics.
Speaker 13: Can you see them all? So if you wanted business.
Speaker 7: Do you think you could get to it?
Speaker 2: It's pretty simple.
Speaker 13: You just click business. And by the way, all this
Speaker 13: news is all people powered press. There's only one exception,
Speaker 13: I buy a wirefeed for sports, but I'm starting to
Speaker 13: get a lot of them, so in another probably in
Speaker 13: another year, I wanted to need it. Okay, so I'm
Speaker 13: going to mouse over national news and here's all your
Speaker 13: different categories. Anybody could get that. It's the local news.
Speaker 13: So if I go to top stories, top stories is
Speaker 13: your front page for local. So in my market, Tina
Speaker 13: arrested after rock thrown through ice vehicle window at Port
Speaker 13: Saint Lucy, Tina arrested through TikTok bomb threat targeting Fort
Speaker 13: Seint Lucy School.
Speaker 7: Because this is the mart I'm in. All of this
Speaker 7: is local news for my area.
Speaker 13: Whereas if I went to another area, which this is
Speaker 13: soou Fall, South Dakota, and I'll go local top stories,
Speaker 13: You're going to see completely different news.
Speaker 7: Turner, what does it say?
Speaker 13: Turner County imposes tough conditions on Freeman area. Whatever this is,
Speaker 13: work resumes. Okay, So here's the thing. All of this
Speaker 13: is boots on the ground. These are all my people
Speaker 13: reporting this news all over the United States, and we
Speaker 13: get it everywhere.
Speaker 7: I'll just do.
Speaker 13: The bigger the market, the more stuff we get, right,
Speaker 13: the bigger the population. So New York, I'm loaded with stuff. Chicago,
Speaker 13: I'm loaded with stuff. La I'm loaded with stuff. So
Speaker 13: this is nineteen year old charge with murder after double
Speaker 13: stabbing at a sweeto Chick fil A.
Speaker 7: All of this is local stuff for the city of Chicago.
Speaker 7: Makes sense. And I mean, look, I could go on
Speaker 7: and on and on. Here's local politics.
Speaker 13: I mean, so the thing with us is the ability
Speaker 13: to be able to put stuff to a specific geography.
Speaker 13: So if you live Chicago's and Cook County, Illinois, but
Speaker 13: so is Let's say I'm trying to think of a
Speaker 13: city like.
Speaker 7: Franklin Park, Illinois.
Speaker 13: Well, if there's a city council meeting of Franklin Park, Illinois,
Speaker 13: it won't show up to any readers in Chicago because
Speaker 13: it's only politics.
Speaker 7: News for Franklin Park makes sense.
Speaker 13: And so and then you know, we distribute ads by geography,
Speaker 13: so we could do it to a city, a county,
Speaker 13: zip code, whatever it is. So this happens to be
Speaker 13: local stuff here. So that's so this I think this
Speaker 13: a picture's worth a thousand words. So we just do
Speaker 13: We do daily news all over the United States. But
Speaker 13: this website looks like a news website. It's a replication
Speaker 13: with local news in every market in America, and that's
Speaker 13: what we're building. So if I took I never met
Speaker 13: to Louisiana before, but like, I know more about what's
Speaker 13: happening in Louisiana in my own market because we can
Speaker 13: contact coming into parish. I don't even know where it
Speaker 13: is Shreveport, Louisiana. It comes in from all over the place.
Speaker 13: So let me stop sharing here. I hope that was
Speaker 13: a good description.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's great. Yeah, it's good that we had the
Speaker 2: website that people could say, I've got a comment here
Speaker 2: from a listener. Naburu twenty twenty nine. Alternative news is
Speaker 2: seldom independent news these days, but on your site it is. Okay.
Speaker 7: So here's the thing.
Speaker 15: Everybody the way YouTube works or Rumble, David, you're the brand, right, Okay.
Speaker 15: Nobody calls you from Rumble or YouTube and tells you
Speaker 15: what to say, right, you call yourself.
Speaker 13: It's your own show. So you're either going to say
Speaker 13: or swim with our platform. The news people are their
Speaker 13: own independent brands. They're the ones that have to bring
Speaker 13: the content, and they're the ones that have to build
Speaker 13: their own audience. What they're doing is leveraging platforms for
Speaker 13: distribution and monetization. M how the new world.
Speaker 7: Is going to work. There's going to be no big
Speaker 7: media companies anymore.
Speaker 13: It's going to be platforms where millions of people can participate.
Speaker 7: Yes, that's where it's all.
Speaker 2: Going I agree. Yeah. And and people are really and
Speaker 2: it's difficult to get news about what is happening locally.
Speaker 2: A lot of it is you know, just flaw or whatever.
Speaker 2: And so if you can get some people going to
Speaker 2: do political news and you know, put that, put that
Speaker 2: in there, that's a very important thing, especially if people
Speaker 2: people need to know what is going to be coming
Speaker 2: down the pike in terms of legislation that's going to
Speaker 2: be done at.
Speaker 1: The state level. What about the state level.
Speaker 2: We talked about things that are happening at the town
Speaker 2: council and things like that. What about following at the
Speaker 2: state level if you want to, if you want to
Speaker 2: filter it that way.
Speaker 7: So I get tons of state stuff state of Washington.
Speaker 13: I just did something in Mississippi, somebody submitted, so state
Speaker 13: politics news, we get a ton of I mean, like
Speaker 13: you know, remember we're bringing in a couple thousand articles
Speaker 13: a week, so a lot of stuff is state stuff.
Speaker 13: A lot of political stuff really, but you hit it
Speaker 13: on the head. So anybody could come up with the
Speaker 13: Monday night football game. It's the high school football game.
Speaker 13: That's the draw. That's what people want to see. So
Speaker 13: it's really about the local because that's what everybody's missing.
Speaker 13: All these local newspapers have went the way of the dinosaur,
Speaker 13: and it's coming with television too. Mark my words. I mean,
Speaker 13: think of the cost to produce the five or even
Speaker 13: on a local level, the physical cost to produce all
Speaker 13: that stuff.
Speaker 7: It's all going away.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 7: What I'm seeing is.
Speaker 13: You're going to have, like I said, the platforms are
Speaker 13: going to be the place where people broadcast.
Speaker 7: And by the way, we're multimedia, so I do audio, video,
Speaker 7: and print. It's not just written news like your show
Speaker 7: could be airing on here right now.
Speaker 13: We have a multimedia section and we have we get
Speaker 13: a lot of traffic to that page because I have
Speaker 13: hundreds of politically conservative content creators in there, hundreds of them,
Speaker 13: and then thousands of news reporters.
Speaker 7: That's the cool part.
Speaker 2: So that's great.
Speaker 1: So you can handle video as well.
Speaker 2: And then what about I mean, our show, for example,
Speaker 2: is three hours long, so we could cut that up
Speaker 2: into small snippets and put.
Speaker 7: Up no, you use the embed code from Rumble. Oh okay,
Speaker 7: so it's really it's really playing on your Rumble channel,
Speaker 7: I see. So for content.
Speaker 13: Creators that are on YouTuber, Rumble or on Spotify, it's
Speaker 13: really an embed code that drives more traffic to your
Speaker 13: own channel. And if you're monetized, you're actually double dipping
Speaker 13: because now you're taking from two places, reaching two different audiences.
Speaker 2: That's great. Yeah, well, NICs of the Storm and Liberty Conspiracy,
Speaker 2: you guys need to take note of this. I think
Speaker 2: it'd be something to be very helpful, be very helpful
Speaker 2: for us too. We've got to get on that as well,
Speaker 2: always looking for another platform. Tell us a little bit
Speaker 2: about how you got into this. Was your background in
Speaker 2: news or was this something as a businessman you just
Speaker 2: saw how news was collapsing and realized there was an
Speaker 2: opportunity in this.
Speaker 13: So that's a good question. I'll tell you. I was
Speaker 13: never in the news business. I worked at a place
Speaker 13: called Lehman Brothers in Chicago. I ended up moving to
Speaker 13: Florida and worked at a couple of boutique firms. My
Speaker 13: thing was, you know, investment, banking, and me and a
Speaker 13: couple of guys got together and we believed that the
Speaker 13: Internet was going to transform media. So we set out
Speaker 13: to build a platform that would ultimately replace it. And
Speaker 13: we failed miserably multiple times trying to figure this all out.
Speaker 7: Because you know, we're never in the business.
Speaker 13: So you know, basically I paid for my own education,
Speaker 13: I guess you could say.
Speaker 8: So.
Speaker 7: Then, you know, once we figured it out, you know.
Speaker 13: You had to go back to the drawing table because
Speaker 13: the model we had, and I'll give you the kind
Speaker 13: of the thing I thought made the most sense. You know,
Speaker 13: all these independent radio stations that are news talk stations
Speaker 13: that have like stringers out there and like a news director.
Speaker 13: Back in twenty fifteen, we built an affiliate network of
Speaker 13: broadcast stations across the United States, kind of like you
Speaker 13: have ABCNBCCBS affiliates, right, We built affiliate network across the
Speaker 13: United States and broadcast stations. Then what happened was, over
Speaker 13: a two year span, almost all of them dropped off
Speaker 13: the network because are you.
Speaker 7: Ready for this?
Speaker 13: It was the first person to go when revenues declined,
Speaker 13: the news people. They let them all go, which means
Speaker 13: they didn't they didn't do news. So a couple of
Speaker 13: them told me you better change your model, and I
Speaker 13: said why, They go, Sam, do you listen to radio?
Speaker 7: I go, no, you go, well, neither would if I
Speaker 7: didn't know three.
Speaker 13: Stations, okay, because I get on serious radio and I
Speaker 13: turned on the car. So I finally decided, you know,
Speaker 13: you ever lay in bed and just where I get
Speaker 13: my do my best work when I'm thinking at night,
Speaker 13: and I said, this needs to go to a monetization model.
Speaker 7: So ultimately we had to rip the engine out of
Speaker 7: the car.
Speaker 13: We had to replace it with something completely different, and
Speaker 13: then we had to test it and the monetization model
Speaker 13: is definitely the way to go. And so then what
Speaker 13: we did was we started on boarding a specific amount
Speaker 13: of people selling advertising, figuring the whole model out. The
Speaker 13: next step is we're now in the scaling boat to
Speaker 13: scale this into the stratosphere.
Speaker 7: So that's how it got started.
Speaker 13: By the way it was all the model was completely different,
Speaker 13: and it evolved into what it is today.
Speaker 7: So what we're doing today is one hundred percent this
Speaker 7: is what it is.
Speaker 2: That's great, Yeah, it's kind of There's an anecdote from
Speaker 2: Jim Rogers, who again he's somebody who worked with George Sos.
Speaker 2: But of course he's been on a lot of financial programming.
Speaker 2: And he said he had because he knew about business.
Speaker 2: He said, I had a wealthy woman who asked me,
Speaker 2: what's the best business school I can send my son to?
Speaker 2: And he said, rather than sending him to a and
Speaker 2: this is wild bag and spending one hundred thousand dollars,
Speaker 2: which would be it'd be a lot more than that today.
Speaker 2: But any said, rather than spending all that money, just
Speaker 2: give him that amount of money and let him start
Speaker 2: a business, and whether that business succeeds or fails, he'll
Speaker 2: learn more than he would getting an MBA. And so
Speaker 2: that really is the issue, the trial and error aspect.
Speaker 2: Actually just getting your hands dirty and jumping in on
Speaker 2: this stuff. That's the way you get your education. I
Speaker 2: guess that's the way that you fine tune things for
Speaker 2: you as well. Talk a little bit about how the
Speaker 2: monetization works in terms of connecting with advertisers. You know,
Speaker 2: what does that look like for the people that are
Speaker 2: doing the reporting and putting it out there.
Speaker 13: So the way our content creators work, as they submitted
Speaker 13: an article, there's an approval process not that we're fact
Speaker 13: checking it.
Speaker 7: It's to make sure it goes in the proper subject.
Speaker 13: Right, if you're doing a football game, it doesn't go
Speaker 13: in business. And then and then the geography what market
Speaker 13: it goes to. And the reason for that is what
Speaker 13: we found was if we let left that up to
Speaker 13: the content creators, there'd be no need for any section
Speaker 13: except front page national news. That will be it doesn't
Speaker 13: matter if it's your kids littlely game or whatever it is.
Speaker 13: So we have to make sure it goes proper subject
Speaker 13: in proper geography. But the way it works is the
Speaker 13: content creators get an email once it's done saying congratulations,
Speaker 13: your article has been published. Here's a direct link to
Speaker 13: your article you could share on social media. And what
Speaker 13: they do is they share the link with the people
Speaker 13: that follow them.
Speaker 7: So let's say you have ten.
Speaker 13: Thousand people on Facebook or x that follow you, that
Speaker 13: link goes out and then every time somebody clicks that article,
Speaker 13: you get a percentage of the ad revenue from the
Speaker 13: advertisers that have selected your type of content to run around. So,
Speaker 13: to make it real simple, I have people that do
Speaker 13: cooking shows that goes in my food and wine section.
Speaker 13: So if you sell pots and pans, you don't want
Speaker 13: to be in conservative news. You want to be on
Speaker 13: the around cooking relate itself, right, But if you sell
Speaker 13: American flags, you want to be around conservative content. So
Speaker 13: it's just all if somebody's reading a golf story and
Speaker 13: you sell golf clubs, have to know the only reason
Speaker 13: they're reading that article is because they play right. So
Speaker 13: it's a slam dunk.
Speaker 7: So it's just a piece of that.
Speaker 13: They're supporting the content creators, they get a piece of
Speaker 13: that ad revenue, and that's how it works.
Speaker 2: That's great. So basically what you're doing is you're marrying
Speaker 2: the content with the type of advertiser that wants to
Speaker 2: do that. So that makes the marketplace for people that
Speaker 2: are there.
Speaker 13: The advertisers actually select the content themselves. They're marrying, yes,
Speaker 13: but in essence yes. So they can say they can
Speaker 13: log in and say I want my ad to go
Speaker 13: to this city or this county or this zip code
Speaker 13: or this state, and then I want these three categories
Speaker 13: to run my ad around.
Speaker 7: And that's how it works.
Speaker 13: And so because the amount of content creators we have,
Speaker 13: we get a fairly large audience coming to this site.
Speaker 13: And so they when they buy an ad, they set
Speaker 13: a budget. It could be one hundred dollars, fifty bucks,
Speaker 13: one thousand bucks, three thousand bucks, and they get exactly
Speaker 13: what they pay for.
Speaker 7: Because we're an impression based ad model. We're not a
Speaker 7: click through ad model.
Speaker 13: So you know that's why national ads are run out
Speaker 13: a penny a pop.
Speaker 7: They're basically no money.
Speaker 13: The beauty is, though, I could sit ten ads around
Speaker 13: a story, so when an ad gets clicked, or when
Speaker 13: a page gets clicked, that page produces ten cents. But
Speaker 13: here's the thing, the real money is not in the
Speaker 13: national ads, David, It's in the local ads, because I
Speaker 13: get ten times the money. So you could have Joe's
Speaker 13: Pizza who only advertises in one or two zip codes. Well,
Speaker 13: his CPM rate is going to be ten times higher,
Speaker 13: but it's targeted. What's his bill going to be five
Speaker 13: bucks a month? Twenty bucks a month in one zip
Speaker 13: code in Chicago is the point.
Speaker 7: So he doesn't care.
Speaker 13: So when somebody clicks that page, it looks to the advertisers, says,
Speaker 13: who wants to advertise in this spot?
Speaker 7: Well it takes the highest big it's always the local guard.
Speaker 13: So in our model, the Joe's Pizzas of the world,
Speaker 13: Trump the home depots.
Speaker 2: In the world. That's great, that's great. I like, yes,
Speaker 2: I like that. I like a business model and that
Speaker 2: that features local businesses and a news model that features
Speaker 2: local news. I think keeping it local really is the key.
Speaker 2: It's great that you're doing this, and it's something that
Speaker 2: we've looked at before and it's something we're going to
Speaker 2: have to try to get our ducks in a row
Speaker 2: and try to get connected with that as well. I think,
Speaker 2: thank you so much, Jim. Great talking to you. It's
Speaker 2: a wonderful model, and I think it's going to be
Speaker 2: very helpful for a lot of people who are consumers
Speaker 2: as well as creators. But it is something that is
Speaker 2: desperately needed. We really need to not lose connection with
Speaker 2: the reality that's right around us, with our community. That's
Speaker 2: where we build things. I think, and.
Speaker 13: Kund of percent, I mean, look, I told you before
Speaker 13: the reason we're in the mess we're in today is
Speaker 13: because you have six institutions that control all the media, everything,
Speaker 13: They own everything, right, all that stuff is dissipating what
Speaker 13: we do will become the next mainstream media. And you know,
Speaker 13: and so my background by the way, as I told you,
Speaker 13: has been capital raising for years.
Speaker 7: That's all I've ever done. I raised capital for private deals.
Speaker 13: This one here, you know, I remember going to it
Speaker 13: was one of those Reawakened America tours in Miami. There
Speaker 13: were five thousand people that showed up there for that event,
Speaker 13: and I looked around and I said, Wow, these are
Speaker 13: the people that are like my people, right, these are
Speaker 13: the people that need to own my product because it's
Speaker 13: you know, they're the patriots, right, and not the institutional money.
Speaker 13: And normally when you you know, my relationships I have
Speaker 13: are with all institutional players that and the reason is
Speaker 13: they all look for deals that are the next Facebook.
Speaker 13: They have all the money and they look for the deals,
Speaker 13: and that's all they do for a living. And so
Speaker 13: I said to I said to somebody, I said, you know,
Speaker 13: it's a shame that when you do a private placement
Speaker 13: it can only be accredited investors. And somebody told me
Speaker 13: there was something called in equity crowdfund. I don't know
Speaker 13: if you're familiar with them.
Speaker 2: No, it's so.
Speaker 13: What it is is it's a private placement done through
Speaker 13: a brokerage firm, but it opens it up to everybody
Speaker 13: So before, like you never got a call from Silicon
Speaker 13: Valley saying, hey, David, I've got some Facebook stock for
Speaker 13: a dollar.
Speaker 7: Okay, Well, the reason I'm going to tell you who
Speaker 7: it went to. It went to all.
Speaker 13: Their friends, right, So every single tech giant that's out
Speaker 13: there was funded from Silicon Valley, from a handful of people.
Speaker 13: Like like bitcoin decentralizes currency, and like our product decentralizes
Speaker 13: the news business, these equity crowdfunds decentralized Silicon Valley because
Speaker 13: all of a sudden, it opens you up to the
Speaker 13: whole world. Now you're limited. Anybody could participate, but you're
Speaker 13: limited in the amount of money that you could put in.
Speaker 13: So it's based on income and it's controlled from a
Speaker 13: brokerage firm. So when you log in to make an investment,
Speaker 13: you can only put in a maximum amount based on
Speaker 13: your income. And if you don't tell them your income,
Speaker 13: you're limited to twenty five hundred dollars in any given year.
Speaker 13: So what we did was our company's raising capital. And
Speaker 13: so we've raised a lot of money and we're rather
Speaker 13: than go to the institutions we said to we said,
Speaker 13: you know, if we're really going to be a people
Speaker 13: powered press, like a news organization that's by the people
Speaker 13: for the people. What would you say to me if
Speaker 13: I told you, oh, by the way, I just got
Speaker 13: an investment for black Rocket paycart. Okay, So I said, okay,
Speaker 13: so that ain't going to fly in my world. But
Speaker 13: let's open this up to the public and let the
Speaker 13: people own the product. So the reason I'm telling you
Speaker 13: that is because we have a private placement where people
Speaker 13: can actually participate in that. And the way they would
Speaker 13: do that is they would go to your news and
Speaker 13: go to the bottom it clicked the button that says
Speaker 13: invest where they'll take them to a page calls Issuance Express,
Speaker 13: which is owned by North Capitol Partners, and they could
Speaker 13: read about what we're doing, and if they want to participate,
Speaker 13: they can click the link and you know, make an investment.
Speaker 13: They can spend two hundred dollars or they could spend
Speaker 13: anywhere in between. But I thought that was the smart
Speaker 13: way to do with David. And the reason is I
Speaker 13: don't want institutional money in this deal, not on this round.
Speaker 13: I'll be doing another one shortly after this one is done,
Speaker 13: and then there'll be a public offering that one's already
Speaker 13: in the works, and we already have that all.
Speaker 7: Put in place.
Speaker 13: And by the way, we're an operating business, so we're
Speaker 13: already up and running. The next step is bringing this
Speaker 13: from the five thousand content readers. We have to fifty thousand,
Speaker 13: which I'm ten percent there. And once we're there, holy crap,
Speaker 13: you got a beast.
Speaker 7: Think about it.
Speaker 13: Fifty thousand news reporters. We are the ten thousand Palcarima
Speaker 13: and by the way, I figure we could do. You know,
Speaker 13: remember there's twenty thousand cities, so if I only had
Speaker 13: five people a city, it's one hundred thousand people.
Speaker 7: Okay, but you.
Speaker 13: Still have that eighty twenty world. So my guess is
Speaker 13: over time will bring out a million. You probably have
Speaker 13: a couple hundred thousand active news reporters. But those news
Speaker 13: reporters are doing things like I get like somebody that
Speaker 13: does local business news, well they'll say this grocery stores
Speaker 13: open up a new location in this place. Or people
Speaker 13: that do restaurant reviews, theater critics, you name it. But
Speaker 13: it's all local all over the United States. And all
Speaker 13: I'm doing is building an army of news reporters. You
Speaker 13: want to talk about power, This is where the people
Speaker 13: need to own this product.
Speaker 7: That's why we're doing it that way. So I just
Speaker 7: wanted to share that because I'm looking for.
Speaker 13: I'm looking for content creators, which somebody like you should
Speaker 13: be on my platform, and then people that you want
Speaker 13: to own a piece of what we're doing.
Speaker 7: We have an equity crowdfund we're doing.
Speaker 2: They can do that. Well, that's great, and local Businesses
Speaker 2: is a great place for them to offer local business. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and I have a comment here from b SU says
Speaker 2: it's very exciting. Said the scariest part of covid was
Speaker 2: that there was no local news, and that really is true.
Speaker 2: It's very different. You know a lot of people were
Speaker 2: putting things head and miss on social media, but that's
Speaker 2: the key thing. The local news was just not reporting
Speaker 2: them that. As some people have said here, the local
Speaker 2: isn't the only answer if your hometown is corrupted. Well,
Speaker 2: if you've got some people who are doing local news,
Speaker 2: they can talk about the corruption that is there and
Speaker 2: they can get that published there. That's not going to
Speaker 2: happen with the focus being strictly on national news that's there.
Speaker 2: So I think that's a really key thing. It's great
Speaker 2: talking to you. Thank you, Sam, and it is very exciting.
Speaker 2: As you point out, people have an opportunity to get
Speaker 2: information about what is happening locally. They can be an
Speaker 2: information content provider. They can actually participate in this if
Speaker 2: they like the business model, and I think it is
Speaker 2: a great business model. I think you're right. It is
Speaker 2: all going in that direction. And you know, we look
Speaker 2: at the big uh, the big news names that are
Speaker 2: out there and really what they are like a giant, dead,
Speaker 2: hollowed out tree and it may look very very imposing,
Speaker 2: but it's ready to just collapse on its own weight.
Speaker 2: And I think that really is the case with what's
Speaker 2: going on with the major news organizations. Again, it is
Speaker 2: yournews dot com, hyperlocal independent journalism website and there's a
Speaker 2: lot of different ways that you can participate in that.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, Sam, I appreciate it.
Speaker 7: Oh, thank you. Good to see you, David, Glad.
Speaker 2: Good to see you again. Have a good time. Thanks
Speaker 2: you too. All right, folks are gonna take a quick
Speaker 2: break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 16: Here newsnow at apsradionews dot com or get the APS
Speaker 16: Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, folks. Thank you for being here with this
Speaker 4: on this Friday, not quite afternoon yet. I want to
Speaker 4: say thank you to Dougalug really do appreciate it. There's
Speaker 4: a little gas for the tank. Thank you, David Travison, lak,
Speaker 4: thank you, Thank you Friday.
Speaker 2: And by the way, we're going to have Tony is
Speaker 2: going to be joining us at the top of the hour.
Speaker 2: We're going to talk about what's going on. A lot
Speaker 2: is going on with Gold and Silver, so it's gonna
Speaker 2: be interesting talk to Tony.
Speaker 4: Yes, we've got Dustin d Helm. I thought they were
Speaker 4: buying up all of the platforms shadow Boxer, TV News
Speaker 4: Traders sold us poison. They were too powerful.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what he's talking about. There's so much consolidation.
Speaker 2: They are buying up all the different platforms that are
Speaker 2: out there.
Speaker 4: So, yeah, there's only a few companies that own almost
Speaker 4: all of the media organizations. I think it's down to
Speaker 4: three or so.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well he was saying six. I would think that's
Speaker 2: even fewer like you're saying.
Speaker 4: I think when you actually look at who owns who
Speaker 4: and the holding groups and it's all this gigantic.
Speaker 2: Especially now this big push by the elsons that are
Speaker 2: that's out there.
Speaker 4: It's this giant incestuous or boros that all feeds back
Speaker 4: in to itself.
Speaker 2: It's monopoly.
Speaker 4: Star Barkley says, it's a fertility ritual. That was when
Speaker 4: we were talking about the h the Indian ceremony. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we were wondering, is this a iaia or may you
Speaker 4: birth a billion bacteria? Yes, it's ai in the sense
Speaker 4: that it's actually Indians. It's real things they do.
Speaker 2: Yes, I don't know. Maybe for dogs, you know, like
Speaker 2: I really like that stuff you rolled in. The dogs
Speaker 2: get excited about that kind of stuff. But I don't
Speaker 2: know about humans. I don't know that would be much
Speaker 2: of a fertility turn on.
Speaker 17: Yeah.
Speaker 4: I think if you find a woman that is attracted
Speaker 4: to that and it's interested in that, you should run away.
Speaker 1: Run are we to.
Speaker 2: Say, I mean, look at their population that's exploding in
Speaker 2: ours this contracting. So maybe they got it right. Maybe
Speaker 2: we need to roll in more of that stuff.
Speaker 4: No, you know what, if we are to decline, I
Speaker 4: will take a slow decline without being covered in cow patties. Yeah,
Speaker 4: there are some things that a man may not abide.
Speaker 4: Star Barkley, No, read that one Epstein Island. Was Trump
Speaker 4: releasing excrement from a plane on them? No, no, they
Speaker 4: did that all themselves. No, no intervention necessary. Do not obey, like,
Speaker 4: don't play with your phone while driving? Yeah, easy, that's
Speaker 4: an easy rule.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, that's the interesting thing that's become the
Speaker 2: go to thing because of Tesla. You know, they put
Speaker 2: that big iPad in the center there. You got to
Speaker 2: play with it, even to ad just your air can,
Speaker 2: your airflow in your car. You got to play with
Speaker 2: that iPad and it's crazy. And I said, that's a
Speaker 2: really distracting thing. So I don't know that. You know,
Speaker 2: they give them a pass for that. They give you
Speaker 2: a ticket if you're using your phone while you're driving.
Speaker 2: But you know, hey, if you're driving a Tesla and
Speaker 2: you're messing around with that big iPad in the center,
Speaker 2: how is that different and how is that fundamentally different
Speaker 2: than cooking your eggs or whatever he was cooking there
Speaker 2: in the center console.
Speaker 4: I don't know, sorry, officer, I was adjusting my in
Speaker 4: flight entertainment al nine thousand. Watson, I hope I never
Speaker 4: see that clip again. Well, you'll probably never see it
Speaker 4: on the day of Night show again. But if you're
Speaker 4: on the internet, sadly, there's always a chance that may
Speaker 4: cross your dashboard. You're never safe. You're never safe if
Speaker 4: you're on Twitter. Don't frag me bro. The first mission
Speaker 4: for the Palanteer software is and was identifying potential whistleblowers
Speaker 4: in government. It's identifying dissidence. Got to make sure. Don't
Speaker 4: want you potentially leaking anything that they might not be
Speaker 4: happy about. Don't frag me bro. Gandhi is also quoted
Speaker 4: as saying they should have never given up arms to
Speaker 4: the British. He was right about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was a reason. Yeah.
Speaker 4: I've also heard tell that Gandhi used to have very
Speaker 4: young underage girls put into bed naked with him to
Speaker 4: test his virtue, to see if he would act upon
Speaker 4: his impulses. So yeah, you know, perhaps Gandhi was not
Speaker 4: the man.
Speaker 2: Lead us not into temptation. Yeah, deliver us from this
Speaker 2: evil Yeah.
Speaker 4: Don't frag me bro. We have the Second Amendment for
Speaker 4: a reason. Yeah, that's if we didn't have the Second Amendment,
Speaker 4: things would be spiraling a lot quicker and a lot harder.
Speaker 4: Of course, the real question is how many people, you know,
Speaker 4: if things got and how many people are actually going
Speaker 4: to engage in a standoff if it comes down to it,
Speaker 4: that's the question, real, Jason Barker, Argentina cows apparently don't
Speaker 4: fart or burp, so it's better for global warming. Yes,
Speaker 4: they're very polite cows. They've trained their cows in etiquette
Speaker 4: down in Argentina, very refined.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So, wonder what Gates has to say about the poop
Speaker 3: festival in the in India, about the cal farts that
Speaker 3: that entails.
Speaker 2: Yeah, how many you.
Speaker 3: Have to pull back on that? It'll lower their social
Speaker 3: credit score?
Speaker 4: How many millions of cow farts are generated in the
Speaker 4: Duwali fest each.
Speaker 2: Year, massive methane release.
Speaker 4: Yeah, not the type of math I would think was
Speaker 4: involved with that sort of behavior, But you know, so
Speaker 4: a look at nineteen eighty Trump isn't a successful businessman,
Speaker 4: but he plays one on TV.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: Do not obey civil nonviolent disobedience is a good start
Speaker 4: injecting truth every opportunity you get. I agree, I agree,
Speaker 4: the civil part can be a bit difficult sometimes when
Speaker 4: you're dealing with these people, you just kind of want
Speaker 4: to start yelling at them and shaking them. It's just
Speaker 4: you idiot, You fool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the role of Christianity. And you know, it's
Speaker 2: gotten to that point where now last weekend there was
Speaker 2: an article I I didn't bring it in to talk
Speaker 2: about it, but somebody was cataloging all the different responses
Speaker 2: that we've had this week where when somebody asks Caroline
Speaker 2: love it, or they ask a pentagon a person a
Speaker 2: question about something, there's a point of question and it's
Speaker 2: like it's a difficult question for them to answer. Responses
Speaker 2: just to come back your mama did it, or your
Speaker 2: mama or this. I don't even understand what that slang means,
Speaker 2: but you know, it's just kind of bullying and rude
Speaker 2: and unresponsive. They don't even try to come up with
Speaker 2: I find that even more offensive than the wiggling around
Speaker 2: like you saw with Lutnik when they asked him a
Speaker 2: direct question. He didn't answer that question. He just repeat
Speaker 2: the statement that he had made previous to that. I
Speaker 2: would prefer evasive rather than bullying confrontational. And then I
Speaker 2: guess profanity, which we start to see from Megan Kelly.
Speaker 2: This is now her new thing to make her look
Speaker 2: like she's got street creds or something. Now she's got
Speaker 2: a potty mouth.
Speaker 4: Look at me, I can say bad words. I'm a
Speaker 4: big boy, I'm all grown up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm a big girl.
Speaker 1: I'm tough.
Speaker 3: When a politician is being evasive, they aren't answering the question,
Speaker 3: but it shows that they're ashamed of not answering the question.
Speaker 3: Whereas this it's almost as though they're proud of not
Speaker 3: responding to you or not engaging it anyway, exactly bullying.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm all in on. You know, if when you're
Speaker 4: arguing a point, if you want to be rude, mean, cruel, abrasive,
Speaker 4: you want to go add hominem, I'm fine with that.
Speaker 4: If we're debating something, if you want to attack me,
Speaker 4: I don't care, just so long as you're actually addressing
Speaker 4: the issue as well. You know, I don't care how
Speaker 4: rude you want to be about it. That's fine, doesn't
Speaker 4: bother me.
Speaker 2: Well, that's kind of the pleasure that Pam Bondi took.
Speaker 2: They would ask her something, she'd be totally non responsive
Speaker 2: to the question. She had a checklist there of Let's
Speaker 2: say we've got these particular thing, I'm going to criticize
Speaker 2: you because of your military record or lack of it
Speaker 2: or whatever, and I'm going to come back to this
Speaker 2: person for that. It was just a complete non sequitor
Speaker 2: and ad hominem. That was though this is just out there.
Speaker 4: You have to address the main point as well. You
Speaker 4: have to address the issue at hand. Anything else you
Speaker 4: want to do on top of that, fine, I don't care.
Speaker 4: But address what we're talking about.
Speaker 2: Mm hm.
Speaker 4: We have Jersey Boy eighty nine. Thank you very much
Speaker 4: for the support, he says, Hello, David, regarding Jimmy from Brooklyn,
Speaker 4: I can ask someone who knows so you can interview,
Speaker 4: So if you can do it, that would be great.
Speaker 4: He has been trying to expose the false collapse of
Speaker 4: the Soviet Union.
Speaker 2: Sure, yeah, well let us know.
Speaker 4: And now I'm reminded of was it blasts from the
Speaker 4: past where the dead is taught?
Speaker 1: You know, it's all.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, at the very end, Christopher Walking
Speaker 2: the Dad, you know, he was always suspicious of the
Speaker 2: Russians and and suspect I've said many times the character
Speaker 2: they plays reminds me of and I can't think of
Speaker 2: his name. I've interviewed him so many times. Joel Scousing,
Speaker 2: Joel Scousen, thank you, you know, building his underground bunker
Speaker 2: and all the rest of stuff and saying that this
Speaker 2: wasn't real. It was all a headfake and everything. So
Speaker 2: you know at the end of the story that these guys,
Speaker 2: you know, it was a plane that crashed and they
Speaker 2: got stuck inside their bunker and they thought it'd been
Speaker 2: a nuclear attack. They find that it isn't. They get out,
Speaker 2: and at the very end they give him a paper
Speaker 2: saying look, Soviet Union is collapsed, and goes, h yeah, right,
Speaker 2: and you see him through the window pacing off the
Speaker 2: next bunker.
Speaker 4: Because it probably made the West pay for it too. Yeah,
Speaker 4: that's right, Jason Barker, COVID was not a real pandemic.
Speaker 4: CDC numbers can verify that.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: You want to make people actually look at real numbers, Jason,
Speaker 4: Come on, numbers are scary.
Speaker 3: Jason Barkers did along with his comment there was no
Speaker 3: local news coverage of it.
Speaker 2: Real.
Speaker 4: Jason Barker also says, remember aj talking about Jade Helm.
Speaker 4: We were witnessing trum execute what Obama trained the troops
Speaker 4: to do back then.
Speaker 2: And I have a theory about that. I believe that
Speaker 2: they pushed that to Info Wars to Joe. I think
Speaker 2: they did that deliberately because they want they knew we
Speaker 2: had done so many reports on the training and the
Speaker 2: militarization of the police. They knew we would jump on
Speaker 2: that and report it and it needed to be reported.
Speaker 2: And then they pulled back and say, see it was nothing,
Speaker 2: and they just you know, to make us look as
Speaker 2: if we had jumped the shark on that. So I
Speaker 2: really do think that was what was really going on
Speaker 2: with that. Well, I've said for the longest time, you know,
Speaker 2: we look at these intimidation lawsuits are being done by
Speaker 2: the Trumps, and Milania has threatened with lawfair billion dollar
Speaker 2: defamation lawsuits over Michael Wolfe, And I said, I think
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting that when people report what Michael
Speaker 2: Wolfe said. You know, Michael Wolfe did a lot of
Speaker 2: interviews with Donald Trump, wrote a book about Trump. It
Speaker 2: was not complimentary, and so now they're enemies and he's
Speaker 2: done further reporting on that. But he also had extensive
Speaker 2: interviews with Jeffrey Epstein and he made some statements based
Speaker 2: on those interviews. One of them was that he had
Speaker 2: introduced Milania to Donald Trump, and the Trumps have their
Speaker 2: own different story about how they met, and so when
Speaker 2: news organizations have reported what Michael Wolfe had said. They
Speaker 2: threatened those news organizations with a billion dollar lawsuit, and
Speaker 2: of course they've got the capital to pull that off
Speaker 2: and to commit that kind of lawfair against people. And
Speaker 2: I said, I thought it was interesting because it never
Speaker 2: sued Michael Wolfe. I said, he's the source of this stuff.
Speaker 2: He's got the documents there. Why don't they do that
Speaker 2: and you do discovery. Well, it turns out they finally
Speaker 2: did get around to threatening him with a billion dollar lawsuit.
Speaker 2: But he's not just taking this passively. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, he's trying to turn the tables on them,
Speaker 2: and he's filed his own suit against Milania, and he
Speaker 2: put this out talking about it and trying to get
Speaker 2: crowdfunding because this is going to be a very expensive process.
Speaker 2: There's what he had to say.
Speaker 6: Okay, I have an announcement for those of you who
Speaker 6: don't know me. I'm Michael Wolfe. I've written four books
Speaker 6: about Donald Trump.
Speaker 18: And also before his death, I extensively interviewed Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 18: not least of all about his relationship with Donald Trump.
Speaker 18: I've spoken publicly about aspect of those interviews, including the
Speaker 18: things Epstein said about his relationship with both Donald Trump.
Speaker 6: And Milania Trump.
Speaker 18: Several days ago, I was notified by lawyers for the
Speaker 18: First Lady that they intend to sue me for a
Speaker 18: billion dollars for some of those statements.
Speaker 6: Now they've threatened.
Speaker 18: And sued other people for related statements about Milania Trump's
Speaker 18: relationship with Epstein.
Speaker 6: These are called slap suits.
Speaker 18: They may have no hope whatsoever of proving defamation, but
Speaker 18: these suits are filed anyway, or these suits are threatened
Speaker 18: to intimidate people from talking about this exact subject.
Speaker 6: I can't live like that. In fact, to be perfectly.
Speaker 18: Honest, I'd like nothing better than to get Donald Trump
Speaker 18: and Milania Trump under oath in front of a court
Speaker 18: reporter and actually find out all of the details of
Speaker 18: their relationship with Epstein, turning the tables on the Trumps
Speaker 18: and refusing to acquiesce to them. Last night, my lawyers
Speaker 18: went into court in New York and asked for a
Speaker 18: declaratory judgment. In other words, we will have subpoena power
Speaker 18: to call witnesses and to find out exactly what the
Speaker 18: relationship between Epstein and the Trumps was. Now, this is
Speaker 18: going to be an expensive effort, and I'm going to
Speaker 18: reach out for everyone support. But I think that this
Speaker 18: is going to be also a very fruitful way to
Speaker 18: finally open this dark curtain and find out what Donald Trump,
Speaker 18: Malania Trump, and Jeffrey Epstein were doing together.
Speaker 2: I think that's going to be very interesting because not
Speaker 2: only will you get them on the stand, but you'll
Speaker 2: be able to do discovery and you know, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean when you do an interview with people, typically
Speaker 2: you have that recorded, and so I've always wondered whether
Speaker 2: or not he has a recording of Jeffrey Epstein saying
Speaker 2: the things that he says that Jeffrey Epstein did. So
Speaker 2: now it's time for them to put up or shut up.
Speaker 2: And this is true of both sides. So I think
Speaker 2: it's going to be a very good thing. I hope
Speaker 2: that moves forward. So before we have Tony come on,
Speaker 2: I just wanted to cover this a little bit some
Speaker 2: interesting news and we have as we move more and
Speaker 2: more into facial recognition and the mercy of computers and
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence, this is a woman who has a particular syndrome.
Speaker 2: It's called Freeman Sheldon syndrome, a rare genetic disorder that
Speaker 2: affects a face, and so I don't know what's wrong
Speaker 2: with their face. This picture that they have their DMV's
Speaker 2: AI system says woman doesn't have a human face. This
Speaker 2: is from yesterday's tech Stack Lance. I didn't get to
Speaker 2: it's kind of a crazy picture that I'm sure that's
Speaker 2: not what her face looks like, but that may be
Speaker 2: what it looks like to the AI says she doesn't
Speaker 2: have a human face. So she's just trying to get
Speaker 2: a driver's license. And they said that AI has had
Speaker 2: particular issues. Sometimes it has an issue with people have
Speaker 2: dark skin or whatever. But the Freeman Sheldon syndrome, it
Speaker 2: affects muscles around the face, particularly in the mouth. That
Speaker 2: won by her photos were all rejected by the dmv
Speaker 2: ID software, and she said it became very embarrassing. I
Speaker 2: became something of a spectacle in the DMV office. Everybody
Speaker 2: was watching and they were taking more photos. It was humiliating.
Speaker 2: It was weird. Here's a machine telling me that I
Speaker 2: don't have a human face, and so you know it's
Speaker 2: got its failings, doesn't it. But speaking of people and faces,
Speaker 2: we talked about this the other day, how people are
Speaker 2: using Sora. It is so good in terms of being
Speaker 2: able to take somebody and put them in a scene
Speaker 2: so you can submit your picture to them if you
Speaker 2: want to have your face used, or somebody can take
Speaker 2: a dead celebrity. And they've been doing this. Like I said,
Speaker 2: I've seen Elvis now starring in every kind of Star Trek,
Speaker 2: Star Wars scenario. They put him in as running for president,
Speaker 2: as a little bit older Elvis. They've done the same
Speaker 2: thing with Martin Luther King, Albert Einstein, and Elizabeth They
Speaker 2: have was the guy.
Speaker 4: That was in the wheelchair, Stephen Hawkins.
Speaker 2: Stephen Hawkins. They put him in in races and wrestling
Speaker 2: matches and diving matches, all these other things. And of
Speaker 2: course I put in mister Rodgers and had him acting
Speaker 2: rude and abrasive, which is totally out of character. So
Speaker 2: I guess now AI is composing videos of the decomposing
Speaker 2: AI generated content to mock and demean deceased individuals. And
Speaker 2: so this is bringing the whole issue we mentioned this
Speaker 2: briefly yesterday, the whole issue about you know, who owns
Speaker 2: these issues and a lot of these some of these
Speaker 2: people are entertainment figures like Elvis Presley. I'm surprised that
Speaker 2: his state hasn't gotten involved in it. I guess they're
Speaker 2: not like Alviren Hitchcock. They understand that it's probably to
Speaker 2: their benefit the more that Elvis Presley is seen out
Speaker 2: there and every everything that you can imagine. They said,
Speaker 2: mister Rogers, Yeah, I heard.
Speaker 3: That Martin over King's family made a statement saying that
Speaker 3: they didn't like these videos.
Speaker 2: Yes, and I heard that Sora was going to actually
Speaker 2: take him out of the loop because people are doing
Speaker 2: very uncomplimentary videos that put it mildly. And but some
Speaker 2: of these other people that are leaving in there. Of course,
Speaker 2: people did that with Robin Williams, and one of his
Speaker 2: children said, people keep sending me this AI slop thinking
Speaker 2: that I want to see this. I don't want to
Speaker 2: see it's it's crude, it's disgusting. But mister Rogers, for example,
Speaker 2: losing his temper and except have filled rage and you know,
Speaker 2: screaming like bill O'Reilly cut cut, are we off? Are
Speaker 2: we live? You know that type of thing. It'd be
Speaker 2: really funny if they did. They could do a movie
Speaker 2: of some con man celebrity who owned casinos actually becoming president.
Speaker 2: I think that'd be one of the funniest videos out there.
Speaker 4: Oh wait, reality is too strange.
Speaker 2: Yeah, got Albert Einstein doing all kinds of stuff, even
Speaker 2: wrestling Queen Elizabeth. The second you got, the one that
Speaker 2: I saw was Steve Irwin, the crocodile Hunter, who you
Speaker 2: know was killed with a stingray. Somebody put a actual stingray.
Speaker 2: He was wrestling a stingray and in a wrestling match,
Speaker 2: and the ropes all around it and everything. I guess
Speaker 2: it was a match to the death. I don't know,
Speaker 2: but said who the open AI will take action to
Speaker 2: reign in these videos of deceased celebrities remains to be seen.
Speaker 2: Imagine it's going to be on a case by case basis.
Speaker 2: I think they said that if people contact them and
Speaker 2: say we don't want any more videos of this or that,
Speaker 2: just like they did with Martin Luther King, they will
Speaker 2: remove the people out of there. Otherwise, I guess if
Speaker 2: you're dead, you're a fair game for them. Historical figures
Speaker 2: so international poem polling shows fear of AI across the world.
Speaker 2: A recent poll by Pew Research Center found the majority
Speaker 2: of US adults think that AI will worsen people's ability
Speaker 2: to think creatively, while half say the tech will deteriorate
Speaker 2: our ability to have meaningful relationships. And there isn't a
Speaker 2: single country that they did this poll in. They went
Speaker 2: to twenty five countries. They didn't find a single one
Speaker 2: where they had more than thirty percent of adults say
Speaker 2: that they were more excited than concerned about AI. This
Speaker 2: is kind of the scenario developing that Hugo de Garis saw,
Speaker 2: and as art liked war, he thought that people would
Speaker 2: go to war over our artificial intelligence, that they would
Speaker 2: realize how it's going to be weaponized and used against them,
Speaker 2: and they would push back against the people who are
Speaker 2: creating this, and that people who were creating it would
Speaker 2: fight back with their high tech weapons. So we'll see
Speaker 2: what happens with it. The AI industry, meanwhile, is using
Speaker 2: this is a story from futurism traumatizing desperate contractors in
Speaker 2: the helping world. These are the people who are doing
Speaker 2: the data laboring, labeling, and they are paying them literally pennies,
Speaker 2: literally pennies to do this kind of stuff. For example,
Speaker 2: if they want to go through and train an AI
Speaker 2: chatbot to be able to generate autopsy reports that wound
Speaker 2: up looking like was you had these contract workers in
Speaker 2: other countries having to shift through thousands of gruesome crime
Speaker 2: scene images to do the data labeling. And one person said,
Speaker 2: you got to spend your whole day looking at dead
Speaker 2: bodies and crime scenes. This guy is in Kenya. His
Speaker 2: name was eliphontis like a elephant.
Speaker 1: I guess.
Speaker 2: Elfantas Kanyugi, a Kenyan data labeler, he said. So, they said,
Speaker 2: these contract workers are not employed by AI companies. They
Speaker 2: subcontracted out, and one of the largest of these companies,
Speaker 2: which is kind of notorious to not paying much and
Speaker 2: having really bad working conditions. When they got something that's
Speaker 2: really really bad, they subcontracted out to someone else. They
Speaker 2: said that they pay workers roughly one cent for every
Speaker 2: task that they finish. That truly is amazing. That's what
Speaker 2: this is all about. So it's not just as they
Speaker 2: point out, it's not just the massive power requirements that
Speaker 2: are out there, but it's also really kind of sweatshop labor.
Speaker 2: And I know it's not physical, it's not dangerous physically
Speaker 2: mentally perhaps who knows, But so they're working these guys
Speaker 2: twenty hours a day, six days a week, paying them
Speaker 2: a penny for every task that they do, truly is amazing.
Speaker 2: But it says so much about the people who are
Speaker 2: running these tech companies, doesn't it. This is relevant to
Speaker 2: us because it's the attitude of the technocracy. Anything for
Speaker 2: a buck or penny, right, and they just have nothing
Speaker 2: but can tempt for human beings. And it'll be kind
Speaker 2: of interesting to see if there's anybody that they're going
Speaker 2: to be able to sell their product to. If they
Speaker 2: don't want to have people have jobs. That's not what
Speaker 2: Henry Ford wanted to do. He wanted to make sure
Speaker 2: that his workers could buy his cars. I don't know
Speaker 2: who's going to buy the product of these people that
Speaker 2: they're putting on. But we've got Tony Hartter been ready
Speaker 2: to come on, and we've got a lot to talk
Speaker 2: about with gold and silver. It's been an amazing time
Speaker 2: and things are moving very quickly, and we've had some
Speaker 2: interesting developments over the last week. So we're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks, and we will be right
Speaker 2: back with Tony to talk about of Wisewelf gold to
Speaker 2: talk about what is happening and the gold market will
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 12: He is a song I'm onto me in your.
Speaker 2: Be happy.
Speaker 12: I got no cash, I got no car, twenty four
Speaker 12: booster shots in your arm.
Speaker 2: Own nothing. Be happy, m hm.
Speaker 12: You can't even buys a store because of your low
Speaker 12: social bedit score. Oh nothing.
Speaker 2: Be happy. You will own nothing and be happy.
Speaker 1: Be happy at Pizza Bugs.
Speaker 16: Elvis, the Beatle, and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 16: them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: All right, folks, welcome back and joining us today rather
Speaker 2: than as is Tony Ardeman of Wisewolf Gold, And of
Speaker 2: course if you go to Davidnight dot gold, that'll take
Speaker 2: you to Wisewolf and let him know that you're coming
Speaker 2: through us. Tony switched days because it has been so hectic.
Speaker 2: The golf market, like everything else, is one of the
Speaker 2: first places I guess where some of the deliberate chaos
Speaker 2: that is being sown into the global economy is showing
Speaker 2: up in the financial markets, and so we've seen a
Speaker 2: lot of stuff moving. What's going on today, Tony, thanks
Speaker 2: for joining us. What's going on in the markets?
Speaker 19: Well, first of all, good to see you again, David,
Speaker 19: And yeah, sorry I hadn't been able to make it
Speaker 19: on my usual Thursdays. My schedule's all over the place,
Speaker 19: and I think if you're watching the metals markets, you
Speaker 19: know why. And it's really just trying to figure out
Speaker 19: what's next.
Speaker 9: I mean, there's a.
Speaker 19: On one side, you've got this avalanche of supply and
Speaker 19: some of the big wholesalers stop buying. On the other side,
Speaker 19: we've got a supply deficit and people can't source products.
Speaker 19: You know, the trades are two or three weeks out.
Speaker 19: So it is a really interesting thing. It's a really
Speaker 19: interesting time to be in the gold and silver business.
Speaker 19: So I've been having to stay pretty nimble. But luckily
Speaker 19: for us, we did a little bit of pre planning
Speaker 19: for this, so we had inventory covered for wolf pack
Speaker 19: and other things, and I've just been I think the
Speaker 19: key thing that.
Speaker 9: I've been able to do is be mobile.
Speaker 19: So I've been back and forth between Missouri and Texas
Speaker 19: and taking inventory there, bringing inventory from there to liquidate.
Speaker 9: So just staying on top of that.
Speaker 19: It's a It has definitely increased my travel time, but
Speaker 19: I'm thankful for it.
Speaker 9: There's a lot going on.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, I don't know how it affected you,
Speaker 2: but I talked about this yesterday the day before about
Speaker 2: what happened with silver and Basically, from what I understand,
Speaker 2: the markets in London couldn't fill the silver orders for people.
Speaker 2: Part of it was because of an Indian religious festival.
Speaker 2: They weren't accumulating excrement liquach Earlier we at the Poop festival,
Speaker 2: but this was about collecting wealth and so typically they
Speaker 2: would collect gold. This year, a lot of influencers in
Speaker 2: India said silver. So there was this huge run on
Speaker 2: silver and it affected markets all the way from India
Speaker 2: to London because even though London had some silver, a
Speaker 2: lot of it was already spoken for and locked down
Speaker 2: because of the paper silver, the ETFs and things like that.
Speaker 2: Did you see that happening?
Speaker 9: Iget you and I've followed that story.
Speaker 19: I'm following the other There's you know, stories in that
Speaker 19: periphery about billion supplies and paperback silver that I've been
Speaker 19: watching closely. We've discussed the nation state involvement in accumulating silver,
Speaker 19: and I think that is what's putting the pressure on
Speaker 19: paper silver to it's exposing paper silver for everything that
Speaker 19: they've done for the past many decades.
Speaker 9: Yeah, the catalyst.
Speaker 19: I think of Russia putting silver as a strategic reserve
Speaker 19: asset was really important. And whatever pressure that is. And
Speaker 19: I think China's calling the bluff of London too. I
Speaker 19: think there's some behind the scenes stuff going on with these,
Speaker 19: you know, the bullion houses and the contracts. I think
Speaker 19: that the Nation States are getting involved now and I
Speaker 19: think that's why we're seeing them break.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I showed the one chart and it was really
Speaker 2: kind of crazy. They had the actual spot price of
Speaker 2: silver and they are gold, and then they had what
Speaker 2: the ETF prices were, and they were two separate lines,
Speaker 2: you know, one of them then they crossed at one
Speaker 2: point that they actually got the same for just one
Speaker 2: point when they crossed. But you know, sometimes it was
Speaker 2: much higher than the actual price of silver. Sometimes it
Speaker 2: was much lower, but they didn't track. And I always
Speaker 2: saw that as a big red flag of something going on.
Speaker 19: Yeah, none of the Shenanigans have taken place. None of
Speaker 19: the papers selloffs have happened like they had back in
Speaker 19: February of twenty twenty one. None of that's taken place.
Speaker 19: So the price suppression game, they just may not be
Speaker 19: able to do it anymore, at least not on the
Speaker 19: level that has been done in the past. So I
Speaker 19: would keep watching these stories unravel about contract exposure and
Speaker 19: what's actually on the books and then what can be delivered.
Speaker 19: I think, you know, this is about trust and a
Speaker 19: worldwide I mean trust is diminishing them because of things
Speaker 19: like our own currency system and the weaponization of the dollar.
Speaker 19: So trust being a factor there, people are going to
Speaker 19: start I think nation states entities will start demanding physical.
Speaker 2: Yeah, speaking of physical You've talked about this quite a bit,
Speaker 2: the urban mining of gold and silver, and there was
Speaker 2: a long article from the New York Times talking about
Speaker 2: the I'm in market there and people taking their jewelry
Speaker 2: in there to take advantage of the higher prices for
Speaker 2: gold and silver. Of course they're not looking at long
Speaker 2: term things. One lady brought in her jewelry and made
Speaker 2: like four or five thousand dollars off it. She's going
Speaker 2: to take a trip, but yeah, it'd be kind. People
Speaker 2: need liquidity, and I think that's one of the things
Speaker 2: that people are saying besides this regular profit taking. You
Speaker 2: had a Federal Reserve somebody who'd been associated with Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve as an analyst and she now has her own
Speaker 2: reporting in her own firm that she runs, and she
Speaker 2: said she thought this was part of this was a
Speaker 2: liquidity freeze for people. She said to me, I look
Speaker 2: at this and I see a liquidity crisis that's very
Speaker 2: similar to March of twenty twenty. And she said, if
Speaker 2: you've got to cash out stuff, you need to cover
Speaker 2: things in a liquidity crisis because you've got margin calls
Speaker 2: or this or that. You're going to take your biggest
Speaker 2: winner and you're going to look that. What do you
Speaker 2: think is going on with all this? Is this simply
Speaker 2: just profit taking or like this woman is saying, do
Speaker 2: you think that there's some other issues with other financial
Speaker 2: markets it's causing people to have to liquidate things.
Speaker 9: No, I think it's all the above.
Speaker 19: And people are urban gold mining, and there's people coming
Speaker 19: into both of my shops and Dennis and Branson, and
Speaker 19: we're buying a lot of scrap jewelry, old coins, things
Speaker 19: that you know, we can always melt. And with the
Speaker 19: prices the way they are, it's worth people going out
Speaker 19: and looking and finding and turning things in and maybe
Speaker 19: even getting back the jewelry price they paid for it
Speaker 19: if they bought it many many years ago.
Speaker 9: They can get all that back at least in dollars.
Speaker 19: So we're seeing that at a really good pace, and
Speaker 19: I think that's only going to continue. But there's also
Speaker 19: massive profit taking in some sectors, and of course, you
Speaker 19: know there's some psychological stuff going on with the pullback.
Speaker 9: And you and I were laughing off air.
Speaker 19: It's like gold drop from forty three hundred plus dollars
Speaker 19: an ounce down to close to four thousand dollars an ounce,
Speaker 19: and it was like, oh, that's the worst drop it's had,
Speaker 19: and this is the gold got wiped out, and I'm like,
Speaker 19: it's over four thousand dollars an ounce, it's gonna be fine.
Speaker 19: It's a forty one to twenty right now as we speak.
Speaker 19: So I think a lot of that's profit taking, and
Speaker 19: you'll see that too.
Speaker 9: Silver was interesting.
Speaker 19: When silver broke its new all time high last week
Speaker 19: or so, we had people coming in and trying to
Speaker 19: sell me everything that was silver, and the refiners, all
Speaker 19: major refiners that I know I haven't found one yet, stopped.
Speaker 19: They stopped buying any scrap silver. They said, we just
Speaker 19: can't do it. We're we're too busy. So at any
Speaker 19: price they would not buy it, and not that it's
Speaker 19: not worth anything, and I'm still buying. I just had
Speaker 19: to lower my prices to what I buy it for
Speaker 19: and I'm just stacking it in the back until they
Speaker 19: can melt it.
Speaker 2: So the last part of that story out of India
Speaker 2: was a guy that had been in business or three
Speaker 2: decades or so and his company was the largest silver
Speaker 2: refiner there in India couldn't find any silver. They were
Speaker 2: completely out of it. It amazing.
Speaker 9: Yeah, it's interesting.
Speaker 19: There's certain things that the refiners here, like in Dallas,
Speaker 19: stopped buying, and.
Speaker 9: Gold has never been an issue.
Speaker 19: They're buying the gold, but they would go all over
Speaker 19: the place on silver. So there's such a it's such
Speaker 19: a mixed bag with that market understanding silver and understanding
Speaker 19: the supply issue and what people want and how you
Speaker 19: can get liquidity. But I think right now that's been
Speaker 19: there's some cooling off and prices of dip below that
Speaker 19: fifty dollars mark. So this is like one of those
Speaker 19: I think a good time just to get into silver.
Speaker 9: It's like, yeah, it'd pulled back.
Speaker 19: So I'm ordering right now, like I'm pushing the buy
Speaker 19: button on a whole bunch of products that I put
Speaker 19: into a wolf pack. So every day that I'm watching
Speaker 19: a little bit of red that's fine. I did the
Speaker 19: same thing with gold. When gold went to four thousand,
Speaker 19: I said, okay, I owed some inventory, so I bought
Speaker 19: five ounces. It's it's whenever these prices go down, I'm
Speaker 19: a buyer, you know.
Speaker 9: So a lot of people.
Speaker 2: Remember a year ago when you know, Trump won the
Speaker 2: election and gold took a dive, and I said, it's
Speaker 2: just on sale because none of the fundamentals have really changed.
Speaker 2: I mean, just take a look at this last week,
Speaker 2: just the last day or so. Here's the debt clock.
Speaker 2: This is the thing. I remember. Thomas Massey bought a
Speaker 2: whole bunch of these national debt clocks that are constantly,
Speaker 2: you know, flipping around and going up, and he handed
Speaker 2: him out to the incoming new congress people. Right, here's
Speaker 2: this for your little pell just to remind you what's
Speaker 2: going on the national debt. And this shows one of
Speaker 2: those at thirty eight trillion. But as even though they
Speaker 2: were looking for it, they it was moving so quickly
Speaker 2: that when they hit the when it hit thirty eight trillion,
Speaker 2: they tried to take a picture of it, but it
Speaker 2: was already added in another eighty three thousand before the
Speaker 2: picture was taken. Because the thing was flipping around so much.
Speaker 2: So the bottom line is is that all of these fundamentals,
Speaker 2: nothing has fundamentally changed. There's going to be profit taking
Speaker 2: as people do in the markets. Nothing is a straight line,
Speaker 2: and it's always going to be a lot of noise
Speaker 2: as people are taking profits and other things like that.
Speaker 2: But the fundamentals have not changed.
Speaker 9: No, not at all.
Speaker 19: And I mean you look at I read a lot
Speaker 19: of the Kitko analysts and some of the people that
Speaker 19: they bring on, and you'll talk about things like, oh, well,
Speaker 19: the trade tensions have lessened with China, so it's a
Speaker 19: good time, and you'll see a little pool back in price.
Speaker 19: But again, big picture fundamentals, the dollar, the dedollarization, the
Speaker 19: issue with our debt. You mentioned the thirty eight trillion
Speaker 19: you know metrics on that where we were one trillion
Speaker 19: dollars the last time silver had another had its all
Speaker 19: time is so in forty five years we've added thirty
Speaker 19: seven trillion dollars in debt and that's only going to accelerate.
Speaker 2: Them thirty eight thirty eight now, yeah, it's.
Speaker 9: Thirty eight now, so you can't keep track of it,
Speaker 9: that's right.
Speaker 19: And we've added you know, this massive amount of debt
Speaker 19: and the not to mention the unfunded liabilities, and then
Speaker 19: you have the geopolitical risk of the foreign policy and
Speaker 19: the trip wires that we have all over the world.
Speaker 19: Now that the metrics and why you would want to
Speaker 19: be outside of this system are there. I mean, for
Speaker 19: the first time, central banks now own more gold than
Speaker 19: they do US treasuries, and it's only a matter of
Speaker 19: time before central banks hold more gold than they do
Speaker 19: US dollars.
Speaker 9: It's only a matter of time.
Speaker 19: It's not that it's not going to happen, because right
Speaker 19: now it's the dollars number one as a Tier one
Speaker 19: asset via the Bank of International Settlements. The number two
Speaker 19: used to be the euro and it got supplanted by
Speaker 19: gold last year.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so geting, I think when I gets up in
Speaker 2: the mid five thousands or something, they'll be, uh, you know,
Speaker 2: it'll be the number one, the tier one asset. You know,
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting to whim we talk about this debt.
Speaker 2: The federal debt rose by a trillion dollars in a
Speaker 2: little over two months, which is the fastest rad of
Speaker 2: growth outside of the pandemic. And of course, when did
Speaker 2: that happen During the pandemic. That was Trump, and he
Speaker 2: wanted to get Massy out because Massy opposed him on that.
Speaker 2: Trump doesn't care a whit about debt and deficits and
Speaker 2: things like that. We saw that from his bankruptcy of
Speaker 2: the casinos that were out there, and so somebody that
Speaker 2: doesn't really care about debt, what eventually happens is bankruptcy.
Speaker 2: And that's where he's taking us as a country as well.
Speaker 19: Right, Well, that's what he said. He used to call
Speaker 19: himself the King of debt. Yeah, that's what he called himself,
Speaker 19: and I just.
Speaker 2: Called himself the king.
Speaker 9: So yeah, used to be.
Speaker 2: But he's defecating on all of us, isn't he with
Speaker 2: his fiscal policy. It's not just a protest.
Speaker 19: Well, I mean he'll maybe we'll go to the last
Speaker 19: time when he needed a bail out, he got Wilburgh
Speaker 19: Ross and the Rothschilds to come in and maybe that's
Speaker 19: what we're doing now. Step we're doing it with the
Speaker 19: entire nation. Maybe that's why that's what the Federal Reserve is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that's why Scott Besson is there because
Speaker 2: he broke the Bank of England with sorrows. So yeah,
Speaker 2: they can break the Federal Reserve with this. I'm sure
Speaker 2: both of them would love to do that. There was
Speaker 2: an interesting article on meanses and said, so what happens
Speaker 2: when gold? You know, when's the next gold bubble burst?
Speaker 2: And they went back and they looked at four previous times.
Speaker 2: I thought that was kind of interesting, And as I'm
Speaker 2: reading it, I thought, but these things have nothing to
Speaker 2: do with the kind of time that we're in right now.
Speaker 2: And in each of those cases, what they pointed out
Speaker 2: was that people had lost all confidence in the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 2: and then the Federal Reserve pull some trick, pull some
Speaker 2: rabbit out of their hat to regain confidence, and that
Speaker 2: was the thing that caused the you know, the increase
Speaker 2: and goal price to collapse. But that's not what's going
Speaker 2: to happen this time. I don't see that happening. I
Speaker 2: think people have lost confidence. I think you've got other
Speaker 2: things that are happening. People are even more aware with
Speaker 2: a Bitcoin of the fact that we've got to get
Speaker 2: out of the manipulation by the Federal Reserve, and of
Speaker 2: course countries all around the world are trying to set
Speaker 2: up a new financial system for all of those reasons
Speaker 2: as well. As the thirty eight trillion dollars and climbing
Speaker 2: of debt that we've got. I think that this time
Speaker 2: is completely different.
Speaker 9: I think so too, And that's a great point to
Speaker 9: bring up.
Speaker 19: You know, you remember twenty eleven and Ben Bernanki came
Speaker 19: out and said, oh, hey, we won't do that with
Speaker 19: with tarp funds and everything. We've bailed out the big
Speaker 19: banks after two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine,
Speaker 19: and so about twenty eleven, gold hit over nineteen hundred
Speaker 19: dollars an ounce and silver hit fifty, so it didn't
Speaker 19: break its all time high at that time. So that
Speaker 19: was that was a metric people were putting their moving
Speaker 19: funds into physical gold and silvers. It was driving those
Speaker 19: prices up, and Ben Berneki said, we won't do that again.
Speaker 19: We have everything stabilized. The markets are you know, are.
Speaker 2: Going to be sorry. We we caused the Great Depression finally,
Speaker 2: but we won't do it again.
Speaker 19: Yes, we won't. We did, we did nineteen twenty nine.
Speaker 19: We won't do this again. And you're right, it's a
Speaker 19: different world now. And I don't think they are going
Speaker 19: to pull a rabbit out of their hat, but it
Speaker 19: won't be the fiat rabbit. I think that they're going
Speaker 19: to do something. I think they're going to reprice everything.
Speaker 19: This is a there's going to be a great devaluation
Speaker 19: and a revaluation in some way. I don't have all
Speaker 19: the answers to that. I'm just this is what I'm
Speaker 19: reading in between. I think with a part of the commodities, gold, silver,
Speaker 19: maybe even bitcoin, and it'll have a lot to do
Speaker 19: with the digitization of our currency.
Speaker 9: David.
Speaker 19: I think it'll have something to do with the stable coin,
Speaker 19: the public private partnership thing that they're doing. Yes, again,
Speaker 19: I don't have all the answers to that, but it
Speaker 19: won't be a fiat rabbit, but they are going to
Speaker 19: do something. It will be a magic trick.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it'll I agree. I think it's going to be
Speaker 2: something about the stable coin, and I think they'll even
Speaker 2: as they're doing now, they're putting in real estate and
Speaker 2: gold and to tether and some of these other ones
Speaker 2: holding that as well, so they'll be able to pivot
Speaker 2: and use some of those things and try to give
Speaker 2: a reality to what will essentially be a feat But
Speaker 2: that's the other side of this thing as well. You know,
Speaker 2: when we look at strictly the different financial things and
Speaker 2: how this is a loss of confidence that we like
Speaker 2: we have never seen before and justly a loss of confidence.
Speaker 2: There's also the CBDC, the digital ID, the digital cash,
Speaker 2: the stable coin, all those types of things, which to
Speaker 2: me that is even more important and more enduring than
Speaker 2: the financial stuff because to be able to have something
Speaker 2: that is physical, that is completely private, that is outside
Speaker 2: of the digital sphere, and the traceability and the trackability
Speaker 2: of all that stuff, I think is to me that
Speaker 2: is the key thing. It's not financial, but it's about privacy.
Speaker 19: I agree, it's very important to have something outside of
Speaker 19: this system. Counterparty is another issue. And if you've got
Speaker 19: lack of trust, that loss of trust that's happened, and
Speaker 19: this happens, you know, we're in a fourth turning, so
Speaker 19: you're talking about institutional turnover and the end of certain
Speaker 19: old institutions and the beginnings of new ones. Perhaps so
Speaker 19: trust is a factor, and you hold that. I have
Speaker 19: a I was on a podcast last night.
Speaker 2: I was showing them.
Speaker 19: I was like, I have a one ounce gold eagle
Speaker 19: here on my desk, and we bought here at the
Speaker 19: shop and Dennison and this is mine right, that's no,
Speaker 19: there's no I don't have to worry about what's on
Speaker 19: a ledger. I don't have to worry about uh, you know,
Speaker 19: if the chairman of the board of that company is
Speaker 19: embezzling or whatever I own is right, and and I
Speaker 19: know what I know what that's worth. So that that's
Speaker 19: the issue with counterparty risk. And in a world where
Speaker 19: trust is diminishing, it's very important to have something outside
Speaker 19: of the system.
Speaker 9: And you know, not everything can be outside of the system.
Speaker 19: And if you you have to trust your bank for
Speaker 19: the mortgage, you have to do crush your company that
Speaker 19: you get your car loan through. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 19: I saw a metric today. I think it was really telling.
Speaker 19: But car payments are at all time highs. That's because
Speaker 19: cars cost more than they ever had. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 19: like the pressure on consumers.
Speaker 2: And that's one of the things that's been going through
Speaker 2: the financial press this last week was the concern about
Speaker 2: several companies that make car loans and a lot of
Speaker 2: people can't pay back their car loans now because they're
Speaker 2: underwater and financial things are getting difficult, and they can't
Speaker 2: sell it because the cars appreciate so quickly and so
Speaker 2: there's even been a lot of articles coming out of
Speaker 2: the UK saying this could spread everywhere. That's not even
Speaker 2: talking about the commercial real estate issues that Jeryl Slinty
Speaker 2: has been talking about. But they're talking about bank failures
Speaker 2: just because of subprime car loans and because of the
Speaker 2: massive expense of cars today.
Speaker 19: Well, everything thrives off of debt and it eventually you
Speaker 19: have to somebody has to get paid back.
Speaker 9: You know.
Speaker 19: That's the problem with having an economy that's built off
Speaker 19: of cheap liquidity, and we've been building that for a
Speaker 19: while now. That's how they measure the metrics in that
Speaker 19: so called health of the economy is lending in liquidity
Speaker 19: and so at some level though, you have to pay
Speaker 19: it back. That's what happened in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 19: In two thousand and nine, prices because there was so
Speaker 19: much Fiat floating around. Prices went up because people bought
Speaker 19: cheap goods from overseas and whatever, and the consumption went up,
Speaker 19: costs went up, and you had then eventually had to
Speaker 19: make a decision whether you're going to put gas in
Speaker 19: your car or pay your mortgage. And people put gas
Speaker 19: in the car because it was four dollars a gallon
Speaker 19: at one point, and that caused a cascading effect of defaults.
Speaker 19: So I think that's what we that's another issue. You're
Speaker 19: absolutely right, whether it's the commercial real estate crisis that's
Speaker 19: on the horizon, or whether it's just a consumer debt
Speaker 19: issue with not with you know, defaults coming in through
Speaker 19: the system. Those kind of things can set off a firestorm.
Speaker 19: And as volatile as everything is, I mean, one day
Speaker 19: we'll wake up, we're going to go put one hundred
Speaker 19: percent tariffs on China in the markets tank, you know,
Speaker 19: like this is not something that we've been through before,
Speaker 19: like that we're we also do that. And you've got
Speaker 19: the weaponization of the of the fiat dollar system worldwide
Speaker 19: and the dedollarization happening rapidly.
Speaker 9: So you're like loss of purchasing power. I mean, David.
Speaker 19: Gold against the dollar. The dollar has lost fifty percent
Speaker 19: of its purchasing power against gold in the last year alone. Yeah,
Speaker 19: that's just a So this isn't this isn't normal what
Speaker 19: we're watching.
Speaker 2: And I think, well, and again, if you look at
Speaker 2: what Scott Bessant dead, you know, this outrageous thing that
Speaker 2: they're doing with Argentina because they're more concerned about Argentina
Speaker 2: than they are America and the harm that Trump is
Speaker 2: inflicted on them with his temper tariffs. They decide that
Speaker 2: they're going to do currency swaps and they're going to
Speaker 2: stabilize the Argentine peso. And those things didn't do anything.
Speaker 2: So again their magic weapon, you know, the almighty dollar,
Speaker 2: that they've used to manipulate everything foreign and domestic. They
Speaker 2: start using that weapon and they find out that they're
Speaker 2: shooting blanks Argentina. It had no effect whatsoever. And I
Speaker 2: think that was a very telling moment that not too
Speaker 2: many people talked about. But you know, Trump is the
Speaker 2: perfect president for this time where these people have picked
Speaker 2: because as all these different things are coming together, we've
Speaker 2: got this confluence of different factors that are economically ruinous.
Speaker 2: He's going to be the guy who doesn't care. As
Speaker 2: long as his name is on a building somewhere, or
Speaker 2: he can build a ballroom somewhere, he doesn't care. That's
Speaker 2: what WILBERA. Ross said about him with the Rothschild. He said,
Speaker 2: look at this, this guy is so popular, we can
Speaker 2: use him. And furthermore, he doesn't really care about running
Speaker 2: the casino stuff as long as his name is on
Speaker 2: the building, and so we can massage his ego and
Speaker 2: we can work with him on that. And that's basically
Speaker 2: what I think the globalists have looked at Trump and
Speaker 2: decided that they've got a guy here who will just
Speaker 2: go along with whatever is happening and not care or
Speaker 2: understand if he does. If he does understand, he doesn't
Speaker 2: care what is really happening.
Speaker 19: I think that's pretty apparent we've gone through. I mean,
Speaker 19: this is the second time he's ran the economy, and
Speaker 19: I don't understand why we're not promoting free markets and liberty.
Speaker 19: And if you wanted to actually make the United States
Speaker 19: economy strong, you start incentivizing people to build things, to
Speaker 19: put capital investments in. You know, you would start talking
Speaker 19: about eliminating certain regulations or the tax code in general.
Speaker 19: You would go after that. But we don't do any
Speaker 19: of those things. And that's really to tell that's right.
Speaker 19: If you wanted to put the United States is the
Speaker 19: most competitive nation in the world and get people from
Speaker 19: all over the planet to build things here and make
Speaker 19: things here and put their capital here, you just eliminate
Speaker 19: stuff like the corporate income tax that'd be a great
Speaker 19: way to start. And you could do that, you know,
Speaker 19: with it, because you have a Republican Senate and have
Speaker 19: a Republican House, and you've got the presidency. If you're
Speaker 19: really serious, you could do that. And that's all theory,
Speaker 19: I know.
Speaker 2: But you said he'd rather manipulate the financial markets, which
Speaker 2: tells you who's controlling him. You know, they come up
Speaker 2: with these they come up with these financial schemes and
Speaker 2: different ways to finesse things financially, rather than getting rid
Speaker 2: of the fundamental problems, which are, as you point out,
Speaker 2: regulation and things like that. That is, the government boot
Speaker 2: is still on the neck of the businesses that he
Speaker 2: said were not central and so it's always you know,
Speaker 2: some new trick, some manipulation, some instead of a fiat currency,
Speaker 2: fiat orders about taxes or this or that. So, yeah,
Speaker 2: the fiat tariffs are going to destroy the fiat currency.
Speaker 9: I agree with that, and that's it's alarming.
Speaker 19: That was kind of the black Swan event coming out
Speaker 19: of in twenty twenty four into twenty twenty five, the
Speaker 19: threat of tariffs on commodities, and that's when I think
Speaker 19: that's when this whole thing started to the damn broke
Speaker 19: because you're right about last year. You know we're talking
Speaker 19: gold and silver was on sale because we're going to
Speaker 19: have this massive crypto boom. You know, they're going to
Speaker 19: have a strategic bitcoin reserve and all this stuff that's
Speaker 19: going to happen with crypto, and you don't need that
Speaker 19: gold and silver because the markets are going to be
Speaker 19: so crazy.
Speaker 9: Well they weren't.
Speaker 19: We went out and said, hey, let's tariff, and not
Speaker 19: that I'm opposed to tariff, especially when they're strategic, but
Speaker 19: it wasn't.
Speaker 9: It was blanket was well.
Speaker 2: It was just just based on his mood that morning
Speaker 2: or last night or whatever.
Speaker 9: You can't depend on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, somebody said something that got him upset. Okay, one
Speaker 2: hundred percent tears now back on China. And so that
Speaker 2: was what all these different cattle associations were saying, one
Speaker 2: after the other, and they said, you know, we've got
Speaker 2: to have stability. We got to have stability and prices.
Speaker 2: We've got to have transparency so people know what that's
Speaker 2: going to be, and we can't have this constant chaos
Speaker 2: and this whiplash back and forth. It's destroying everything, not
Speaker 2: just the cattle industry. And I point out you know,
Speaker 2: that's what the Chicago Border Trade was set up to do,
Speaker 2: to make sure that farmers knew what the price is
Speaker 2: going to be when they brought their product produce to
Speaker 2: market in a few months. Trump is destroying all of
Speaker 2: this for every kind of business, not just the agricultural business,
Speaker 2: but also for manufacturing, for retail, for large and small.
Speaker 2: Nobody knows what's going on because he's just constantly whipping
Speaker 2: things back and forth. It's just total chaos.
Speaker 9: It's total chaos for chaos sake. Yeah, that's what that's
Speaker 9: to me. That's all. The only explanation is just creative destruction.
Speaker 19: Yes, and hiding behind the guys of this is there's
Speaker 19: a plan here, not a plan to help you anyway.
Speaker 9: And I see people struggling.
Speaker 19: That's you know primarily, that's what I see right now.
Speaker 19: And I see it in the markets, and I see
Speaker 19: it in people that are selling products to me. I
Speaker 19: see it out on the street, you know, when I'm working,
Speaker 19: you know, taking stuff to the bank or anything that
Speaker 19: I'm interacting with the public. I see what's going on,
Speaker 19: and it's not a healthy economy. And there's more I
Speaker 19: think turmoil ahead.
Speaker 2: That's right. The plan is for you to trust them,
Speaker 2: because the plan is a con game, a bunch of
Speaker 2: con men. And that's why I'm very concerned about this
Speaker 2: con that is a stable coin and they're not tying
Speaker 2: it to stable things, and it's not a coin. All
Speaker 2: this stuff is just uh, it's just one one thing
Speaker 2: after the other, one con game after the other. That's there. Well,
Speaker 2: tell us little bit about it. I know you've been
Speaker 2: super busy at wisewelf. Tell us a little bit about
Speaker 2: what's what's going on there, what you're what you're into
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 19: Well, I think the name of the game right now
Speaker 19: is going to be a supply and speed and ability
Speaker 19: to continue to transact business. It's getting a little bit
Speaker 19: harder to do, but not impossible, and I've built my
Speaker 19: business to be able to sustain. I didn't quite plan
Speaker 19: just for this, but in something that was akin to this,
Speaker 19: and so right now just trying to keep everything supplied
Speaker 19: and make sure people get products. I think that the
Speaker 19: lull and prices will allow things to cool off a bit,
Speaker 19: but I wouldn't surprise me at all if we have
Speaker 19: another run here soon, especially if the geopolitically, if there's
Speaker 19: any sort of tension or break in the patterns that
Speaker 19: we're seeing right now with trade talks, or if there's
Speaker 19: anything on the horizon for any sort of tension, Metals
Speaker 19: are still primed to go. You could have some more
Speaker 19: pullback too, But to me, it's not about the you know,
Speaker 19: the investment side of it. It's more watching this in
Speaker 19: You're right you mentioned earlier about it. I think there
Speaker 19: is a number that if gold hits that it starts
Speaker 19: showing the I mean, it is showing the weakness of
Speaker 19: the dollar.
Speaker 9: But I think that that's when the.
Speaker 19: Like eclipse is the dollar and becomes the gold supplants
Speaker 19: the dollar once and for all is the most held
Speaker 19: reserve asset. And once that happens, we're gonna I mean,
Speaker 19: there's going to be some real consequences internally for us economically,
Speaker 19: and it may have it may have a cascading effect.
Speaker 19: I'm not sure, but I think that price is probably somewhere,
Speaker 19: like you said in about the mid five thousands, I
Speaker 19: think that's when you'll see central banks that will eclipse
Speaker 19: that most held reserve asset. So I'm watching everything leading
Speaker 19: up to that day was kind of planning for what's next.
Speaker 19: But we're just digging in I'm definitely not doing any
Speaker 19: more location.
Speaker 2: And of course, you know, yes, Jamie demon said that
Speaker 2: this last week, well, I could see gold going five
Speaker 2: to ten thousand dollars an ounce, but he said, I'm
Speaker 2: not going to buy any of it. So he's not
Speaker 2: trying to get people to buy gold or silver, but
Speaker 2: he could see that happening. And that's on the low
Speaker 2: end where you have a major disruption in the world's
Speaker 2: financial systems. But of course the major disruption in the
Speaker 2: financial system is a self inflicted wound, both by Biden
Speaker 2: and also now by Trump, all these sanctions that were done,
Speaker 2: and you know, war and talk about war is another
Speaker 2: thing that also drives gold. So you stop and think about,
Speaker 2: you know, the fiscal policy, the debt, what the federal
Speaker 2: Reserve is doing with interest rates. All these different things
Speaker 2: are affecting the price of gold. Wars affect the price
Speaker 2: of gold. And then of course you've got this other
Speaker 2: factor which is trying to set up some kind of
Speaker 2: a digital currency that's going. All these things are driving
Speaker 2: people into gold and silver.
Speaker 19: I think, yeah, so many factors, and you know, I
Speaker 19: think the big picture and you look get all of
Speaker 19: the rest of the supposed wealth in the world, and
Speaker 19: what a fraction of a fraction the actual gold market is.
Speaker 19: We've just we've just begun same thing with bitcoin and silver.
Speaker 19: We've just begun to get the market share of this
Speaker 19: revolution and money that's going on right now. They're going
Speaker 19: to do and there's a new valuation coming. There's going
Speaker 19: to be a devaluation of the old and a revaluation
Speaker 19: of the new, and they'll take these commodities will be repriced.
Speaker 19: I don't know what the price is going to be, Yeah,
Speaker 19: but definitely do something new. And we're just we're in
Speaker 19: this stream of history. It's it's interesting, David, it's a
Speaker 19: privilege to be here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you've got to be very careful, move very
Speaker 2: quickly because i mean, you know, the largest silver refiner
Speaker 2: in India can't get this whole, can't get a hold
Speaker 2: of any silver in the London. Markets are out of it.
Speaker 2: I mean, things are going to get really difficult. So
Speaker 2: it's a great way to gradually save money, put it
Speaker 2: into some asset that is not a rapidly depreciating asset.
Speaker 2: And again wise Wolf Gold and their wolf pack is
Speaker 2: one way that you can do that great way to
Speaker 2: gradually save money and to start trying to get yourself
Speaker 2: into having a little bit of a nest egg and
Speaker 2: a little bit of a backup plan there. And I
Speaker 2: know a lot of people who have benefited from it.
Speaker 2: We've been infited from it. We've had some people who
Speaker 2: have sent us some things from wise Wolf. I really
Speaker 2: am appreciative of that, and so it's a great thing.
Speaker 2: We've been able to see the kind of work that
Speaker 2: you do. Appreciate what you do, Tony. Appreciate your support
Speaker 2: for the program as well.
Speaker 9: I appreciate you, David.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: So do you have any broadcasts?
Speaker 2: Usually on a Thursday, you've got a broadcast that's coming up,
Speaker 2: but you haven't been able to do the broadcast.
Speaker 9: I've been able to do my show.
Speaker 19: I've had to run best of it, and I think
Speaker 19: maybe next week we'll have a new show.
Speaker 9: But today I've got interviews as soon.
Speaker 19: As I leave this show, and I've got the shop
Speaker 19: opening up, so I'll be busy.
Speaker 2: Well, I appreciate I know how busy arets. I appreciate
Speaker 2: you taking the time to come on. It's always great
Speaker 2: talking to you. Love your insights. Tony Ardeman of Wisewolf
Speaker 2: Gold and you can get to Tony. If you go
Speaker 2: to Davidnight dot Cold, I'll let him know that you
Speaker 2: came through us. Thank you so much, Tony, appreciate it
Speaker 2: See you guys, all right, take care, bye bye. We'll
Speaker 2: be right back folks.
Speaker 1: Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, folks. We are almost at the end of
Speaker 4: the broadcast here in the third hour. It's always a
Speaker 4: pleasure having Tony Ardabernon again. You can find everything you
Speaker 4: need at Davidknight dot Gold. If you're looking to start
Speaker 4: a crewing gold or silver or gold and silver, that's
Speaker 4: the place to go. I want to quickly remind you
Speaker 4: at Homestead Products dot Chop is having a sale on
Speaker 4: their organic juniper sell.
Speaker 2: So you can go to Homestead Product cool product.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, your skin. It's good for antimicrobial properties. It
Speaker 4: can help with all kinds of different things. If you're
Speaker 4: savvy about skincare, you can get the juniper sell. And again,
Speaker 4: the only ingredients they have in there are dried juniper berries,
Speaker 4: bees wax, and avocado oil. It's not cut with a
Speaker 4: bunch of random garbage. It's high quality, made in America
Speaker 4: and they are the good guys. So Homestead Products dot
Speaker 4: shop check out their organic juniper sell and you can
Speaker 4: get ten percent off other products with promo code nite. Again,
Speaker 4: Homestead Products dot chop promo code nite for ten percent off.
Speaker 2: Yes, well, you know, let's let's talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about sanctions, because it's not just Biden with his sanctions
Speaker 2: that kicked off a lot of this stuff sanctions against Russia.
Speaker 2: Trump wants to put even more sanctions on Russia. And again,
Speaker 2: these sanctions have historically not really hurt Russia. Certainly Biden's didn't.
Speaker 2: Immediately they got Europe continued to buy energy from Russia
Speaker 2: energy products, and what Russia did was to offer a
Speaker 2: huge discount because initially what it did was it shot
Speaker 2: the price of oil up for everybody. So they said, well,
Speaker 2: we'll give you a discount off of that if you
Speaker 2: pay by gold or if you pay with our own currency.
Speaker 2: So it actually was a windfall for them. On Wednesday night,
Speaker 2: Trump announced sanctions against Russia's two largest oil companies, Ross
Speaker 2: Neff and Luke Oil. The measures followed the collapse of
Speaker 2: a proposed meeting with Putin. The Kremlin had signaled that
Speaker 2: it was unwilling to meet America's terms for a ceasefire.
Speaker 2: Medvedev said, the US is our enemy and its talkative
Speaker 2: peacemaker has now fully embarked on the war path with Russia.
Speaker 2: And he put peacemaker in air quotes, because if you're
Speaker 2: selling weapons, if you're arming one of the sides that's there,
Speaker 2: you're not actually a negotiator, an independent peacemaker, a Nobel
Speaker 2: Prize candidate, you are actually participating in a war. And
Speaker 2: Medvedev called that out. So the decisions taken are an
Speaker 2: active war against Russia, and now Trump has fully aligned
Speaker 2: himself with a looney Europe. The European Union also announced
Speaker 2: new sanctions on Russia, including a ban on the import
Speaker 2: of liquefied natural gas. The natural gas ban will phase
Speaker 2: out imports rather than halp them immediately. Oh okay, so
Speaker 2: this is an emergency, is it. It's kind of like
Speaker 2: the COVID emergencies. Well, we'll gradually put these restrictions in
Speaker 2: on you. If they were serious, they would have stopped
Speaker 2: this long ago. They're not serious. They don't see Russia
Speaker 2: as a threat. They're the ones who are threatening Russia,
Speaker 2: and they're ramping this up gradually. The same way as
Speaker 2: we saw with the Convid stuff. So German chencer Fred
Speaker 2: Mertz said he was confident that European leaders would now
Speaker 2: move to seaze the two hundred and ten billion euro
Speaker 2: that they had frozen of Russian assets. Trump's decision to
Speaker 2: improve sanctions marks the latest shift in his relations with Putin,
Speaker 2: who has frustrated President's desire to capitalize on the ceasefire
Speaker 2: and Gosla with his deal in Ukraine. Remember when he
Speaker 2: was bragging about how he was a better president than
Speaker 2: Washington and Lincoln. He said, We've created peace in eight
Speaker 2: different wars, and we got the ninth one about to
Speaker 2: come in. Well, actually, no, he hasn't done any of that.
Speaker 2: Look at these tremendous sanctions, said Trump. These are very
Speaker 2: big ones that are against their two big oil companies.
Speaker 2: And we hope that they won't be on for very long.
Speaker 2: We hope that the war will be settled. Hopefully he'll
Speaker 2: be reasonable, Hopefully Zelensky will be reasonable. You know, it
Speaker 2: takes two to tango, as I say, and we'll find out. Well,
Speaker 2: you're the one who is supplying the music for the dance,
Speaker 2: because you're the one who's supplying the weapons. To Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Europe is not capable of doing this to a large degree.
Speaker 2: This is all coming from America. If you want peace,
Speaker 2: just stop giving Ukraine money and weapons and that will
Speaker 2: stop the killing. But Trump is not doing that, and
Speaker 2: he's not going to do that. He hasn't done that
Speaker 2: now for nearly a year. The sanctions mean that any
Speaker 2: Russian asset held by these companies and the US will
Speaker 2: be frozen. Banks are people who deal with the two
Speaker 2: oil companies and their subsidiaries could also face sanctions. So
Speaker 2: what Trump is doing is he's providing even more incentives
Speaker 2: for people to get out of the dollar, to get
Speaker 2: out of the financial system that has been their superpower,
Speaker 2: foreign and domestic. And then you have Mark Ruta, the
Speaker 2: NATO head who was the guy who was trying to
Speaker 2: destroy the farms and Netherlands. Isn't it interesting all these
Speaker 2: people want to take us to war also want to
Speaker 2: kill our food supply. Mark Ruta is one of them,
Speaker 2: as well said the move was about quote changing the
Speaker 2: calculus by putting more pressure on the Krimlin. He joined
Speaker 2: Trump in the White House on Wednesday after flying to
Speaker 2: Washington to deliver a twelve point piece plan drawn up
Speaker 2: by Europe. No, this is a plan for war. Europe
Speaker 2: wants war because when you look at what they have
Speaker 2: done to their own economies with the net zero attacks,
Speaker 2: with the immigrants and all the rest of the stuff,
Speaker 2: their economies are in freefall, their countries are in free fall.
Speaker 2: And as Jerald Clinty has always said, when everything else fails,
Speaker 2: they take you to war. This is why they are
Speaker 2: so held bent, literally held bent on war in Europe
Speaker 2: and the Oval Office. On Wednesday, Trump confirmed the summit
Speaker 2: with Putin had been canceled. So Zelensky has signed a
Speaker 2: letter of intent to acquire a whopping one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty Swedish fighter jets over the next ten to fifteen years.
Speaker 2: I think Trump and the US military industrial complex are
Speaker 2: not going to be too happy with this. Their idea
Speaker 2: was that Europe would use its money or the money
Speaker 2: that they stole from Russia to buy weapons from America.
Speaker 2: But Sweden has a cheaper version of the F thirty
Speaker 2: five fighter that again they are not going. This is
Speaker 2: I think the disturbing thing, the long term plans for
Speaker 2: war that these people have put together. The Swedish plane
Speaker 2: that he just bought one hundred and fifty of They're
Speaker 2: not going to be able to even start delivering that
Speaker 2: for another two or three years. What does that tell you?
Speaker 2: They don't have any intention for peace. This is a
Speaker 2: long term plan, just like all this stuff has been
Speaker 2: long term plan going back to the nineties. The gradual
Speaker 2: encroachment on Russia to take Russia over. That is what
Speaker 2: this has truly been about for the longest period of time,
Speaker 2: and that's what all the Russia Gate stuff was about
Speaker 2: and so forth. But Trump is playing into all of this.
Speaker 2: Ukraine assigned the letter of intent the Swedish government to
Speaker 2: get a huge batch of advanced fighter jets over the
Speaker 2: next ten to fifteen years. Astoundingly, Ukraine says that it
Speaker 2: seeks to acquire as many as one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: of these over a long term. It purchased worth many billions,
Speaker 2: which you know, where are they going to get that
Speaker 2: money from, Well, they get it from the US. Maybe
Speaker 2: they will use the money that was stolen from Russia
Speaker 2: with the frozen funds. Zunski also confirmed that Ukrainian pilots
Speaker 2: are already being trained on the advanced fighter He declared
Speaker 2: this is the start of a long journey of ten
Speaker 2: to fifteen years. This is a never ending war, folks.
Speaker 2: They're not going to be satisfied. It's not enough for
Speaker 2: them to just de industrialize your they have to decimate it.
Speaker 2: They have to reduce it to rubble. And this is
Speaker 2: the position of the leaders. They absolutely know what they're doing.
Speaker 2: Just go back and look at Leuxey Arrestovich saying that
Speaker 2: on Ukrainian television. He said, yeah, in three years, we're
Speaker 2: going to be a war with Russia. And the person said, oh,
Speaker 2: that's horrible. We're not going to have peace in this
Speaker 2: civil war that has been going on since the US
Speaker 2: engineered the coup. No, no, we're not going to have that.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, we're going to be at
Speaker 2: war with Russia and this country will be havocked. That's
Speaker 2: what he had the translation that they came out with it,
Speaker 2: and the reporter said, that's horrible. He said, no, we
Speaker 2: get into NATO. They don't care what happens to their
Speaker 2: own countries. The leaders of Germany, of the UK of France,
Speaker 2: they don't care what happens to their countries. If they did,
Speaker 2: they wouldn't be bringing in the massive armies of migrants
Speaker 2: that are fighting people in the streets. But this is
Speaker 2: a deliberate effort by the globalist to destroy all of
Speaker 2: Western civilization. And this is where this is headed. We're
Speaker 2: talking about roughly three years before we can start deliveries.
Speaker 2: We can't deliver one hundred and fifty aircraft and one batch,
Speaker 2: said the leader of Sweden. The modernized version of the
Speaker 2: saab jet has only this month entered use by the
Speaker 2: Swedish Air Force. So this is their top of the
Speaker 2: line stuff that's there. It is a cheaper alternative to
Speaker 2: America's highly advanced and ultra expensive F thirty five. And
Speaker 2: this is where they're putting all their money. And it'll
Speaker 2: be kind of maybe that will help us to get
Speaker 2: Trump to actually impose a piece. And again, he doesn't
Speaker 2: have to get these two guys to agree. He can
Speaker 2: just stop giving weapons to Ukraine now and have it
Speaker 2: right now. It's very simple. Actually, it is anybody's guests
Speaker 2: where the Russian Ukraine war will be one year from now,
Speaker 2: And certainly the future decade is highly unpredictable. The conflict
Speaker 2: is growing more dangerous by the day, especially given NATO's
Speaker 2: ever increasing involvement, writes zero Hedge. Currently there's a lot
Speaker 2: of speculation that this new Swedish aircraft purchase will be
Speaker 2: funded utilizing frozen Russian assets and European banks, which the
Speaker 2: Kremlin has denounced as theft and piracy. Well, we're not
Speaker 2: against piracy. I mean, look at what we're doing in Venezuela,
Speaker 2: blind people out of the water. You don't even need
Speaker 2: the money, right.
Speaker 4: Yo ho yo.
Speaker 2: Russia's response to the Tomahawk strikes would be staggering, said Putin.
Speaker 2: Russia will deliver a very serious, if not downright staggering
Speaker 2: response to the Ukrainian strike using US made Tomahawk missiles,
Speaker 2: said Putin. On Thursday. He called pressure a call for
Speaker 2: pressure on Washington to supply such weapons quote an attempt
Speaker 2: at escalation, Yeah, he said, this is an attempt to excaalation.
Speaker 2: But if such weapons are used to strike Russian territory,
Speaker 2: they responsibly be very serious, if not downright staggering. Let
Speaker 2: them think about that. Well, all this is happening as
Speaker 2: Mark Ruta, the guy who tried to starve his own
Speaker 2: country and put them under the control of Bill Gates
Speaker 2: and other people in his family who were running picnic
Speaker 2: and food distribution systems where they wanted them buying Bill
Speaker 2: Gates' lab food instead of the Netherlands farms. And again
Speaker 2: it's very important because the Netherlands with the most productive
Speaker 2: farms in Europe. He tried to destroy that. They kicked
Speaker 2: him out, so they put him in at NATO because
Speaker 2: these people, it's all the same people that are running
Speaker 2: this war, that are trying to destroy the food supply
Speaker 2: of people in Europe and in America. He said this
Speaker 2: would be an escalation attempt. If Russian territory is hit
Speaker 2: with such a weapon, the responsibly serious, if not outright overwhelming.
Speaker 2: Moscow has previously warned that although Tomahawk deliveries would not
Speaker 2: affect the state of the battlefield on the Ukraine conflict,
Speaker 2: they would diminish peace prospects and strike a blow to
Speaker 2: US Russian relations. That's right. There's not a sufficient number
Speaker 2: of them to really change this around. And what we
Speaker 2: would do is we would wind up decimating our supply
Speaker 2: of Tomahawk cruise missiles at the same time. And that's
Speaker 2: one of the things Trump is saying. He said it
Speaker 2: wouldn't be easy for US to provide Kiev with tomahawks,
Speaker 2: said Washington should not deplete its own arsenal for Ukraine.
Speaker 2: But we've done that in a number of different ways,
Speaker 2: and it wouldn't be surprised if they were to do
Speaker 2: this as well. So the French. The new commander of
Speaker 2: the French Army, General Mandan, has said France has to
Speaker 2: be ready for war with Russia within four years. French
Speaker 2: forces could be at war with Russia by twenty twenty eight,
Speaker 2: the country's newly appointed chief of staff has claimed. And
Speaker 2: again they keep coming back what you see from every
Speaker 2: one of these European countries, whether it is Germany or
Speaker 2: France or the UK, they're all hell bent and they
Speaker 2: are absolutely certain that within a couple of years they're
Speaker 2: going to be at war with Russia. They're telling their
Speaker 2: hospital system you've got to be ready to handle thousands
Speaker 2: of casualties a day, and it is just amazing. This
Speaker 2: is government assisted suicide on a mass scale. Moscow has
Speaker 2: repeatedly rejected claims that plans to attack you EU countries,
Speaker 2: saying any such allegations are being used by European politicians
Speaker 2: to scare the population and to justify growing military spending.
Speaker 2: Russia has also said it is defending itself in the
Speaker 2: Ukraine conflict, accusing NATO of provoking the hostilities. Mandon, who
Speaker 2: became France's top general in early September, said, Russia as
Speaker 2: a country that may be tempted to continue the war
Speaker 2: on our continent. The first objective I have given the
Speaker 2: armed forces is to be ready in three or four
Speaker 2: four years for a shock that would be a test
Speaker 2: by Moscow. The test already exists in hybrid forms, but
Speaker 2: it may become more violent. So will this be some
Speaker 2: kind of a false flag or what I mean? Really,
Speaker 2: when you look at this Domino thing, this is as
Speaker 2: much of a fake narrative as the justification for the
Speaker 2: Vietnam War. There was no Domino that happened after Vietnam
Speaker 2: won the war. You didn't see China marching through all
Speaker 2: of Southeast Asia. It was an obvious lie. Historically, people
Speaker 2: could look at it and see that it was a
Speaker 2: life They knew anything about the history of Vietnam and China.
Speaker 2: They could see that Vietnam was not a client state
Speaker 2: of China. And the same thing is true here. This
Speaker 2: is fear mongering by the people who start the war,
Speaker 2: who want the war, who want to continue the war.
Speaker 4: Also, when you look at it, we briefly talked about
Speaker 4: the Civil War not that long ago in Fort Sumter,
Speaker 4: and how it was a very strategically good move for
Speaker 4: what they wanted. They get to continually build up forces
Speaker 4: in this one area and either you let them reach
Speaker 4: a critical mass where if they decide to launch the invasion,
Speaker 4: then it doesn't matter that you know, now they've got
Speaker 4: bad pr because they managed to accumulate such a large
Speaker 4: force and such a foothold that they're going to immediately
Speaker 4: sweep you. They win, they take the area, and there's
Speaker 4: nothing you can do about it. You don't have to
Speaker 4: fight to get that territory back, or you launch the
Speaker 4: preemptive strike to prevent that and you look like the
Speaker 4: bad guy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so this is a shall pointed out that Abraham
Speaker 2: Lincoln had experimented and tested different ones, different places. You know,
Speaker 2: where can we go to probe them? You know, where
Speaker 2: are we most likely going to get the pushback that
Speaker 2: they did get there in South Carolina.
Speaker 4: It was a strategically useful position in many ways. Like
Speaker 4: I said, either you know, they attack you and they
Speaker 4: then look like the bad guy and you have probable
Speaker 4: cause to you know, launch the war, or they don't
Speaker 4: and you just build up your forces to the point
Speaker 4: where you immediately take this area and you have a
Speaker 4: foothold in their backyard. So it's a lose lose situation.
Speaker 4: And that's what you know, everyone in Europe is doing.
Speaker 4: It's like, oh, well, we think we're going to be
Speaker 4: engaged with Russia. We're going to have to fight Russia,
Speaker 4: so we better start building up our military. At which point,
Speaker 4: you know, Russia has to then do the calculus of
Speaker 4: at what point do we have to initiate a first attack?
Speaker 4: You know, at what point do they reach a critical
Speaker 4: mass where if they decide to attack us, it's over
Speaker 4: immediately at least that's what these you know, world leaders
Speaker 4: are going to be thinking about whether or not a
Speaker 4: first strike has ever justified as another debate entirely, but
Speaker 4: this is what they have to sit around think of.
Speaker 4: You know, are they going to reach a critical mass
Speaker 4: of infrastructure built up of troops armed, you know, liaisons
Speaker 4: with England or these other countries, where if we do
Speaker 4: not somehow stop their supply chain in its tracks, are
Speaker 4: we going to immediately lose? Are we going to get
Speaker 4: rolled up in smoked immediately? And so that's what they're doing.
Speaker 4: They're making this an inevitability where if they continually posture
Speaker 4: for war and say we're preparing for it, we're going
Speaker 4: to be ready in four years, does that mean Russia
Speaker 4: then has to sit there and think, well, a year three,
Speaker 4: maybe we've gone to do something, and year three do
Speaker 4: we have to cripple their infrastructure somehow? And so you
Speaker 4: were sitting there, you know, playing these mind games which
Speaker 4: are going to drastically impact your citizenry at some point.
Speaker 2: Well, it's a soul moving juggernaut that's been moving directly
Speaker 2: towards them for thirty years. And you've had people like
Speaker 2: Lindsey Graham going with John McCain saying, well, next year
Speaker 2: we're going to go after Putin. We're going to go
Speaker 2: in there and get him. I mean that was before
Speaker 2: Russia entered the war, and so.
Speaker 4: Said John McCain didn't get to live to see this
Speaker 4: glorious day.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he would have loved to see the death and
Speaker 2: the slaughter, wouldn't he.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that was my theory on who the real ghost
Speaker 4: of Kiev was. John McCain was up there possessing the pilots.
Speaker 2: Putin said earlier this month that those in the West
Speaker 2: who keep promoting nonsense is what he said about alleged
Speaker 2: aggressive intentions by Moscow are either incompetent or dishonest, he said,
Speaker 2: frankly speaking, one wants to just tell them calm down,
Speaker 2: sleep well, finally address your own problems. Look at what
Speaker 2: is happening on the streets or European cities. What is
Speaker 2: happening with the economy, with industry, with European culture identity,
Speaker 2: and with the huge debts and the growing crisis of
Speaker 2: the social security systems, out of control, immigration, the rise
Speaker 2: and violence, including political violence. Putin said, well, all of
Speaker 2: these problems are exactly why they want war with Russia,
Speaker 2: because when all else fails, they take you to war
Speaker 2: and everything is failings. That's the sad reality that we
Speaker 2: see with all this. Before we run out of time,
Speaker 2: let's get some of the comments here.
Speaker 4: That's right. Steve Evs for Tony says, watch out for
Speaker 4: civil asset forfeiture in your travels Tony. Yeah, yeah, I'm
Speaker 4: sure Tony takes every precaution. He's not going to be
Speaker 4: He's not going to be caught like some other people are. Generally,
Speaker 4: that's born out of ignorance. People trust the government. They think, well,
Speaker 4: I'm not committing a crime. You know, I've got to
Speaker 4: move and I've got a bunch of cash, and it's
Speaker 4: the only way for me to effectively care. And then
Speaker 4: they get stopped and the cop looks at it and says, oh,
Speaker 4: what are you doing what You've got ten thousand dollars here.
Speaker 4: That's probably going to a drug deal. So I think
Speaker 4: I'm just going to assume it's a drug deal and
Speaker 4: take that. Good luck fighting us in court.
Speaker 2: And I'm going to charge the money or the car
Speaker 2: or the plane, or the house or the crime. And
Speaker 2: that's what it says, the US government versus nine thousand
Speaker 2: dollars in cash. That was one of the first cases
Speaker 2: I remember seeing. It was it was a black guy
Speaker 2: who had a gardening business, and what he did was
Speaker 2: he would take a flight down take cash with him.
Speaker 2: He would pay for the stuff and the car and
Speaker 2: the truck rental and everything, and then drive it back.
Speaker 2: And so he goes to the airport and he pays
Speaker 2: for his ticket and cash, and they call the cops
Speaker 2: and they come out. They find the nine thousand dollars
Speaker 2: in cash, and you're obviously a drug dealer, and they
Speaker 2: stole it from him. But he had done that over
Speaker 2: and over again. But that was one of the very
Speaker 2: first cases of that. That was back in the eighties
Speaker 2: early eighties.
Speaker 4: I wonder if the cash resisted arrest, Stop resisting. Get
Speaker 4: on the ground, CJP, rumble, fold it in half. Ye
Speaker 4: got a stack of hundreds in a chokehold, CJP rumble
Speaker 4: BONDI answers like Kamala Harris with a vocabulary. At least
Speaker 4: she doesn't have that horrendous cackle that Kamala did. Small blessings.
Speaker 2: She's too mean to laugh.
Speaker 4: Yeah, GDP three point thirty. Just like Trump, all hyperbole
Speaker 4: or hyper bowl, depending on how you feel, and rhetoric
Speaker 4: designed to entertain and not inform his useful idiot base
Speaker 4: high boost his relationship with Epstein. I promise you Milania
Speaker 4: was trafficked, he says, high boost Opossum King. Baltimore County
Speaker 4: Council members are calling on school officials and police to
Speaker 4: review an AI gun detection system after an alert mistakenly
Speaker 4: detected that a student had a weapon. That's great, get
Speaker 4: your kid taken down by the cops, tased, pepper sprayed
Speaker 4: because some AI system somewhere said it looks like he's
Speaker 4: carrying a weapon.
Speaker 2: Or maybe shot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, hallucinating a mass shooter.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm, the real octo spook. The average American will
Speaker 4: get a lot of use out of that ballroom and
Speaker 4: find its importance in their lives.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 4: I can't wait. I'm very excited. I'll be taking a
Speaker 4: trip up there to enjoy the ballroom.
Speaker 2: Well, the country is going down the tubes, but Trump
Speaker 2: is having a ball. That's that's the way this is
Speaker 2: all going to be rolling out.
Speaker 4: Maybe it's one of those jokes, you know, mister presidents
Speaker 4: don't have balls. And then they had to Christian constituitial
Speaker 4: conservative says, I missed the first hour? Did David comment
Speaker 4: and Steve Bannon's latest comments? Did anyone here see them?
Speaker 2: Actually, I've got a clip of that right here, Steve
Speaker 2: Bannon talking about Trump's third term. I guess that is
Speaker 2: what you're talking about.
Speaker 20: So Trump twenty eight. Trump is going to be president
Speaker 20: of twenty eight and people just want to get accommodated
Speaker 20: with that.
Speaker 17: So what about the twenty second Amendment?
Speaker 20: There's many different alternatives. At the appropriate time will lay
Speaker 20: out what the plan is.
Speaker 2: But there's a yeah, we'll just ignore the constitution.
Speaker 9: The president in twenty eight.
Speaker 20: We had longer odds in sixteen and longer odds in
Speaker 20: twenty four than we got in twenty eight. And President
Speaker 20: Trump will be the President United States, and the country
Speaker 20: needs him to be president United States. We no, it
Speaker 20: doesn't to finish what we started, and the way.
Speaker 4: We need Trump, we need him.
Speaker 20: Trump is a vehicle. I know this will drive you
Speaker 20: guys crazy, but he's a vehicle divine providence.
Speaker 9: He's an instrument.
Speaker 6: He's very imperfect.
Speaker 20: He's not your minces, not particularly religious. I agree, he's
Speaker 20: an instrument of divine will. And you could tell this.
Speaker 7: Of how we may be a judgment, a judgment for.
Speaker 20: At least one more term, right, and he'll get that
Speaker 20: in twenty eight.
Speaker 17: You're not driving me crazy. I'm really simp I'm trying
Speaker 17: to understand the coherence of the things you've just told
Speaker 17: me in the last few minutes. On the one hand,
Speaker 17: you've said the Constitution is fit for purpose. Secondly, you've
Speaker 17: said that President Trump needs another term, even though the
Speaker 17: twenty second Amendment makes pretty clear that he cannot have a.
Speaker 2: Second another time.
Speaker 17: Why does it make that clear because he's a the
Speaker 17: second time already at.
Speaker 20: Some point in time, we will make sure we go
Speaker 20: through Zanny and define all those terms.
Speaker 2: But.
Speaker 17: Undermine the You will be undermining the spirit of that mendment,
Speaker 17: even if you find some way around it. And to those.
Speaker 20: If the American people, with the mechanisms we have put
Speaker 20: Trump back in office, are the American people tearing up
Speaker 20: the constitution? Would that be turning up with would they?
Speaker 6: Would the American people be going.
Speaker 2: Are you talking about a mobocracy instead of a republic
Speaker 2: based on law?
Speaker 17: What you will end up with miss justification for a
Speaker 17: quasi dictatorship.
Speaker 2: That's not true at all.
Speaker 9: Trump sounds like Trump is dictatorship.
Speaker 20: Did you just see the compromises he had to make
Speaker 20: on the big beautiful bill. You see the compromises he
Speaker 20: has to do on everything, on accommodating Zelensky, on what
Speaker 20: on what Trump? Trump is nothing but a series of
Speaker 20: negotiations to kind of keep this thing rolling forward.
Speaker 2: He compromised everything. Our constitution, morality is the rule of law.
Speaker 2: He compromises everything.
Speaker 17: By the side. There's no room for debate, there's no
Speaker 17: room for compromise. We must smash them. And now you're
Speaker 17: telling me this is a negotiation.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's no.
Speaker 20: On the only way President Trump wins in twenty twenty
Speaker 20: eight and continues to stay in office. Is by the
Speaker 20: will of the American people.
Speaker 2: I got to say that I can't say enough to
Speaker 2: talk about my contempt for Steve Mannon. This guy's not
Speaker 2: even smart. He's another Peter Navarro. He didn't have to
Speaker 2: go to jail, but he went to jail because of
Speaker 2: his hubris. He decided that he was going to go
Speaker 2: and talk to refuse to talk to Congress. He could
Speaker 2: have gone and taken the Fifth Amendment, but instead he's
Speaker 2: going to be a tough guy. And as she's pointing out,
Speaker 2: you want to talk about how the Constitution is what
Speaker 2: we need to get to, but you have nothing but
Speaker 2: contempt for it. As Lance said, well, we've already defined
Speaker 2: what three is. It's that comes after two. And if
Speaker 2: you want to talk about terms, you have two terms.
Speaker 2: That's those terms are already defined. We have a definition
Speaker 2: a term for a term. He just doesn't like what
Speaker 2: it has to say, so he's going to ignore it.
Speaker 2: Have a good weekend than the common Man. They created
Speaker 2: common Core dumb down our children. They created Common Past
Speaker 2: to track and control us. They're Commons project to make
Speaker 2: sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They
Speaker 2: see the common man as simple, not sophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 1: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 2: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 2: information and links you'll find at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 2: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 2: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow
Speaker 2: dot com