Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen in this corner from the University of Colorado,
Speaker 1: thirty years in the rain, fighting for truth, justice and
Speaker 1: the American Way.
Speaker 2: Good Man, this is the American Way right on full display.
Speaker 3: I mean, we're just kind of hours away, right from
Speaker 3: this race being decided.
Speaker 2: It's so close you feel like you could reach out
Speaker 2: and touch it. And what do we have.
Speaker 3: We got the choice to write, We've got the choice
Speaker 3: whether to keep our country, keep our country as we've
Speaker 3: always known it, keep our country as it served the world,
Speaker 3: or we have a choice to become something very unlike America.
Speaker 3: And once that happens, who knows if there's a chance
Speaker 3: to turn back eight five to five for zero five
Speaker 3: eight two five five the number. But I know you
Speaker 3: know all that, which is why you listen to shows
Speaker 3: like this, whether you're on the right, which most people
Speaker 3: the audience are, or whether you're on the left. We
Speaker 3: appreciate having you here and so many folks who just
Speaker 3: bounce back and forth right kind of right in the middle.
Speaker 3: I put my wife in that camp, registered Democrat forever.
Speaker 2: Somebody.
Speaker 3: I think my daughter told me, excuse me, that she
Speaker 3: recently became unaffiliated. I've got to ask her about that,
Speaker 3: but she's always kind of bounced back and forth. Like
Speaker 3: John McCain asked her to host a town hall for him,
Speaker 3: and she did that even though she was a registered Democrat.
Speaker 3: So you get all those folks too. And all I'm
Speaker 3: saying right now is as we are in this absolutely
Speaker 3: critical phase. So great to be taking this ride with you.
Speaker 3: Eight five five four zero five eight two five five
Speaker 3: and something big every day, right like today President Trump
Speaker 3: comes out and says, okay, there isn't going to be
Speaker 3: a third debate. Love to hear from you. Do you
Speaker 3: think he's right or wrong to do that? Does it
Speaker 3: make him look weak? Does it make him look strong,
Speaker 3: make him look like a winner, make him look like
Speaker 3: a loser? Is it going to have any impact on
Speaker 3: the arc of the race? To get your take on that?
Speaker 3: Have some fresh Thank you, Kelly, sound normally to be
Speaker 3: Ryan pulling it, but he claims to have COVID Is
Speaker 3: that right? So where do you go to get these
Speaker 3: falsified tasks? You know, whatever you need to take? What's
Speaker 3: he taking now? A four or five day vacation? But
Speaker 3: our friend Ryan on the DL today, so kind of
Speaker 3: like Ferris Bulett, right, just get everybody praying for Ryan
Speaker 3: and then he can enjoy himself out of the game.
Speaker 3: All right, here is the latest from President Trump today.
Speaker 3: He's talking both about, you know, not doing a third
Speaker 3: debate and then hitting a theme that I think is
Speaker 3: absolutely perfect.
Speaker 4: But I am angry about Venezuelan gangs taking over.
Speaker 3: An Okay, my bad. I took that in reverse order.
Speaker 3: Here's how it starts, and then he gets to that
Speaker 3: messaging you just got a taste of, which I think
Speaker 3: is man. I think this is right on target.
Speaker 4: There will be no third debate.
Speaker 5: Way.
Speaker 4: The voting has already begun. You got to go out
Speaker 4: and vote. We gotta vote. We're gonna this is gonna
Speaker 4: be the most important vote in the history of our country.
Speaker 2: It will be the most important.
Speaker 4: People said that I was angry.
Speaker 2: At the debate, angry, very angry.
Speaker 4: And yes, I am angry because he allowed twenty one
Speaker 4: million illgal aliens invading our communities. Many of them are criminals,
Speaker 4: many are criminals. I'm angry. They said, he's an angry person. No,
Speaker 4: they're destroying our country. I don't like she's you know,
Speaker 4: she's smiling, Oh, practice right, did you see it?
Speaker 5: She's like.
Speaker 4: We're talking about a border invasion the likes of which
Speaker 4: no country has ever suffered. And she's like this, but
Speaker 4: I am angry about Venezuelan gangs taking over Aurora, Colorado
Speaker 4: and illegal Haitian So he came in, illegal Haitian migrants
Speaker 4: taking over a beautiful place. It was so beautiful Springfield, Ohio.
Speaker 4: I was there. I campaign there a while ago. Springfield,
Speaker 4: it was so beautiful. Now it's just what a place.
Speaker 4: Can you imagine? You have this small little community, all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, you have twenty thousand illegals in your community.
Speaker 2: Nobody knows where they come from.
Speaker 4: I'm angry about young American girls being raped and sodomized
Speaker 4: and murdered by savage, criminal aliens. I'm angry about rampant
Speaker 4: inflation destroying our middle class, and the American people are
Speaker 4: also very angry about that.
Speaker 3: And see, I think this general messaging is right on
Speaker 3: target that yeah, he's angry, but it's righteous anger, it's
Speaker 3: justified anger. If you can't get angry at injustice, then
Speaker 3: you are a waste of breath, You're waste of space,
Speaker 3: and you sure as hell shouldn't be president of the
Speaker 3: United States if you cannot get angry at this kind
Speaker 3: of injustice. So I think that's generally great messaging, and
Speaker 3: it's a great contrast because on the other hand, you
Speaker 3: have her even the other night, and she really blew
Speaker 3: it right because, and I understand, compared to the in
Speaker 3: the basement expectations for her, for good reason, she exceeded
Speaker 3: those by a mile, because she was thoroughly protected by ABC.
Speaker 2: But but she blew it.
Speaker 3: Because she had this one opportunity, which is why she
Speaker 3: started begging for that second debate right away. She had
Speaker 3: this one opportunity to look the American people in the
Speaker 3: eye and convince them she's not a phony, convince them
Speaker 3: she's not a liar, Convince them that she has actually
Speaker 3: changed these wacko positions of hers and for good reason,
Speaker 3: and explain why. And she wouldn't even try to do it.
Speaker 3: And that's how she blew it. So that's why she's
Speaker 3: begging for a second debate. She missed her opportunity, and
Speaker 3: she couldn't have delivered on that anyway, because the truth is,
Speaker 3: she has not changed those positions. It's a lie to
Speaker 3: say she's changed those positions. So that's why she's begging
Speaker 3: for a second debate. Now, I know we have great
Speaker 3: callers and textures who disagree with Man that they think
Speaker 3: Trump looks weak for not being willing to agree to
Speaker 3: what would be a third debate. Actually, I think it's
Speaker 3: exactly the opposite. But I want to hear from those
Speaker 3: who disagree, and we'll start with eerie Mike. But here's
Speaker 3: the point. If Trump agrees to this third debate, then
Speaker 3: she just portrays that is see, he's admitting he lost,
Speaker 3: He's admitting he lost, he needs a rematch because he lost,
Speaker 3: And then she would use the specter of the upcoming
Speaker 3: third debate to distract from the truth about her. Trump
Speaker 3: would be an idiot to agree to a third debate
Speaker 3: because then you take up all the oxygen in the room.
Speaker 3: You want every bit of focus you can get right
Speaker 3: now on who she really is.
Speaker 2: And you've been blessed with all of this.
Speaker 3: It's on video, all of this stuff on video of
Speaker 3: her saying incredibly far left stupid things that are going
Speaker 3: to bury her. So why in the world would Trump
Speaker 3: want to agree to a third debate and distract from
Speaker 3: stuff like this.
Speaker 2: And it's a specific phase of life.
Speaker 6: Remember, age is more than a chronological fact. What else
Speaker 6: do we know about this population eighteenth through twenty four?
Speaker 2: They are stupid.
Speaker 6: That is why we put them in dormitories, and they
Speaker 6: have a resident assistant.
Speaker 2: They make really bad decisions.
Speaker 3: And you got twenty more of these right everything. We
Speaker 3: got the tape right here, and we played it first.
Speaker 3: I don't think anybody else is airing it out there
Speaker 3: of her saying, yeah, she wants taxpayer dollars for sex
Speaker 3: change operations for illegals in prison. No, don't distract from
Speaker 3: any of that. So I think he's doing exactly the
Speaker 3: right thing in this messaging that Yeah, okay, she's so
Speaker 3: happy over there, because you know what, She's happy we
Speaker 3: have open borders. She's happy that our elections soon are
Speaker 3: going to be decided by people who who aren't Americans, right, because.
Speaker 2: That's all Democrat plan.
Speaker 3: Get all these people here and eventually have them be
Speaker 3: able to vote. She's happy about And you go down
Speaker 3: through this laundry list, and then Trump says, I'm not
Speaker 3: happy about this. I'm angry about this. I want to
Speaker 3: change it. Which of those do you think is the
Speaker 3: winning message?
Speaker 2: Let's go to Eerie. Mike, you're on the Dan Kapla Show. Welcome.
Speaker 5: Hey, Mike, I agree with you that I think it
Speaker 5: would be foolish of Trump to debate again, but for
Speaker 5: a different reason than you think. I think I liken
Speaker 5: it too. I was playing golf of the colleague the
Speaker 5: other day and we were playing match play and we're
Speaker 5: just playing nine holes and I had him shut out
Speaker 5: by seven, so you haven't ten bucks. And then I
Speaker 5: gave an opportunity to get his money back on the night,
Speaker 5: fulle because I was playing really well and I knew
Speaker 5: it would again beat him again, and I did. And
Speaker 5: I think that's exactly what she's like. She's thinking, is
Speaker 5: that beat them like a drum?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 5: And why not do it again? Why not do it again?
Speaker 2: Mike?
Speaker 3: Have you ever heard of a fighter. Have you ever
Speaker 3: heard of a fighter who has just won a fight
Speaker 3: saying he wants a rematch like a big prize fight.
Speaker 3: Have you ever heard of that or seen it?
Speaker 5: I know you got the email talking points from Trump.
Speaker 5: That's great, danwer.
Speaker 7: It.
Speaker 3: Just wave a white flag, Mike, Just wave a white
Speaker 3: flag and say, Okay, Dan, you have a winning argument.
Speaker 2: I have nothing.
Speaker 5: And I'm telling you a true story that happened just
Speaker 5: the other day. I wanted another Rema Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump should Donald Trump at this point should take
Speaker 3: all the focus off of her awful record and who
Speaker 3: she truly is by agreeing to a third debate, which
Speaker 3: will then suck up all the attention.
Speaker 2: And I understand why you would want.
Speaker 3: That, because you want Trump to lose, right, I mean,
Speaker 3: it's it's something my mom told me when I was
Speaker 3: very young. Never take advice from people who want you
Speaker 3: to fail. And do you want Trump to fail?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 5: Of course I want Yeah, of course I think he's
Speaker 5: a danger.
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 5: I think his whole strategy when he does a debate
Speaker 5: is to say something so ridiculous like he did with
Speaker 5: this evening of the Dogs and the Cats, that everybody
Speaker 5: gets distracted and says, wait a minute. He couldn't even
Speaker 5: answer a single policy question when I asked him.
Speaker 2: About uh, he answered a lot of policy questions. Mike
Speaker 2: called on.
Speaker 3: I don't want you to go anywhere, but we have
Speaker 3: to hit this hard break. In fact, if you look
Speaker 3: at the internals of the post debate polling, yeah, you
Speaker 3: have most people saying, Okay, she had a better debate,
Speaker 3: But when you then get down to the issues that
Speaker 3: matter to people, he actually gained on the economy, still
Speaker 3: has an enormous lead over on immigration, et cetera. Some
Speaker 3: the issues that matter most, including Warren Peace. You know,
Speaker 3: I think he was a clear winner, but appreciate those
Speaker 3: who disagree. So we'll come back to eerie mic. You're
Speaker 3: on the Dan Kapla show, CBS News talking about Michigan.
Speaker 6: So I talked to twenty voters. Thought one of them
Speaker 6: was undecided? Wow, not one And headlines come and go.
Speaker 6: But let me tell you this support for former President
Speaker 6: Trump is real and resilient. I encountered that everywhere I went,
Speaker 6: and that's something the Harris campaign knows recognized as the
Speaker 6: fact in Michigan.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's in Michigan.
Speaker 3: And a new poll out in Michigan today had Trump
Speaker 3: upped one in any one poll. Right, you have to
Speaker 3: take with whatever. But this is part of an overall trend.
Speaker 3: So on many many, many fronts looking very good.
Speaker 2: Right now.
Speaker 3: Now you will see, I mean CNN this big blaring headline,
Speaker 3: first post debate poll Harris plus five.
Speaker 2: Holy cow.
Speaker 3: Well, I did a little research and I found out
Speaker 3: what pole they're talking about. It's the Morning Console poll
Speaker 3: where she has held a steady plus four lead, even
Speaker 3: at the same time that the New York Times poll has.
Speaker 2: Trump up one.
Speaker 3: So yeah, that proves my point in Trump's favor that
Speaker 3: even after the very best night Harris can have, because
Speaker 3: of the corruption of ABC, the rigging of that event
Speaker 3: by ABC, the best night she could possibly have, she
Speaker 3: gains maybe a point, and many indicators she didn't even
Speaker 3: gain that.
Speaker 2: So hey, let's go back to Mike.
Speaker 3: From Eerie kind enough to disagree with me. So Mike,
Speaker 3: keep it going, my friend, we're having fun.
Speaker 5: No, I was just continuing my point that I wish
Speaker 5: I had a mute button every time some discussion wasn't
Speaker 5: doing exactly my way, Candy one, but oh you can
Speaker 5: do that, just hang up. Yeah, I know. So my
Speaker 5: point is is that when you're when you're on a roll,
Speaker 5: you want to stay on a roll. You want to win,
Speaker 5: you want to and when someone get somebody down, you
Speaker 5: put your foot on their neck and you okay, And
Speaker 5: that's what she's gonna do.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 8: So if we can move, he knows he's going to
Speaker 8: get his asking if.
Speaker 3: We can maybe visit planet of Earth for a second.
Speaker 3: So you're telling me in a presidential race that if
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris said, is there.
Speaker 2: Something in the background there are you shoveling something? My friend?
Speaker 3: Oh, maybe just chipping on cement whatever. But anyway, so
Speaker 3: you're telling us, well, one understand your premise that Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris comes out of this debate believing she had done
Speaker 3: what she needed to do to win the presidency, and
Speaker 3: then she's going to say, oh, but that's not good enough.
Speaker 2: I want to put my boot on his throat.
Speaker 3: So even though I want and I'm going to win
Speaker 3: the presidency, I want another debate.
Speaker 2: That's your theory.
Speaker 3: Okay, tell me this, then tell me this. Then did
Speaker 3: she do enough in that debate to win the presidency?
Speaker 5: Well, certainly we won't know until between you.
Speaker 2: You're not claiming she did well.
Speaker 3: Just basic logic and truth tells you that if she
Speaker 3: thought she was arking toward victory, she would not.
Speaker 2: Want to change that.
Speaker 3: Right, So the last thing she'd want to do would
Speaker 3: be have another debate or something big could happen. If
Speaker 3: she thinks she's on an arc to win, the last
Speaker 3: thing she'd want is another debate. Well, okay, then explain
Speaker 3: explain why, Explain why.
Speaker 5: My point is is that when you're playing well and
Speaker 5: your opponent is playing poorly, which is what I perceived
Speaker 5: happened Tuesday night. Do you want to keep that going?
Speaker 3: You want to know why are the polls, Why are
Speaker 3: the polls not supporting your premise?
Speaker 5: It's Thursday, Dan, Okay.
Speaker 3: Let's let's talk about the CNN. Let's talk about the
Speaker 3: CNN poll that came out right afterwards. And this was scientific.
Speaker 3: They had the same group before him that they had
Speaker 3: polled and measured, and they had everybody on dials. And
Speaker 3: the CNN poll came out right afterwards, and you had
Speaker 3: sixty percent say she won and forty percent say he won.
Speaker 3: But she did not gain in the race, and he
Speaker 3: extended his lead on the key issue of the economy,
Speaker 3: and he kept his big lead on the key issue
Speaker 3: of immigration.
Speaker 2: So how do you read into that that somehow she won?
Speaker 3: I mean, if if winning means winning the presidency and
Speaker 3: the debate didn't gain anything for her, how's that a win?
Speaker 5: Dan? You said, I don't know how many times on
Speaker 5: this program I listen to you on a casion, how
Speaker 5: many times did you say, I don't believe this poll,
Speaker 5: but I do believe.
Speaker 3: Okay, Well, okay, so you're telling us Mike, you're telling
Speaker 3: us you do not believe the CNN poll. Okay, fine,
Speaker 3: you don't believe the CNN poll they did that night.
Speaker 3: Can you point to any post debate poll at this
Speaker 3: point that suggests she changed the arc of the race
Speaker 3: in her favor?
Speaker 5: Dan, she won the debate?
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, you know here's the difference.
Speaker 5: Mike.
Speaker 3: You don't have David Muir to help you here, so
Speaker 3: I'll give you another chance. Are you going to answer
Speaker 3: this very fair question directly? Have you seen any any
Speaker 3: poll that suggests she changed the arc of this race
Speaker 3: in her favor?
Speaker 9: No?
Speaker 5: Okay, all right, that's right.
Speaker 3: You'd rather call this show uninformed, and I understand that
Speaker 3: can be if you're a Harris fan, you are unburdened
Speaker 3: by what has been including Pole's I love that question.
Speaker 5: You asked the question. It was it smart that he
Speaker 5: not debate. I answered your questions and I gave you
Speaker 5: a serious to watch.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and we're grateful for that, Mike, But you couldn't
Speaker 3: back it up.
Speaker 2: That's that's the point, my friend. Thank you. Our lines
Speaker 2: are jammed, and listen. I love that I love that
Speaker 2: it'll call and disagree.
Speaker 3: I love that he has a theory, but the bottom
Speaker 3: line is, and I think it's undeniable. If she thought
Speaker 3: she did enough that night to win, the last thing
Speaker 3: she'd want is another debate.
Speaker 2: Well, why take the risk?
Speaker 3: She knows she can't have a better night than the
Speaker 3: other night because she can't be more protected than that.
Speaker 3: And if those ABC moderators had not been corrupt, if
Speaker 3: they had not rigged it, if they had not election interfeered,
Speaker 3: she would have crumbled. She would have crumbled on that
Speaker 3: very first question. If David Muhr had just come back
Speaker 3: and said, wait a second, men, a vice president, respectfully,
Speaker 3: you didn't answer my question, do you think Americans are.
Speaker 2: Better off now than they were four years ago?
Speaker 3: She would have gone off into some kind of word
Speaker 3: salad and the whole night would have gone south. For Carlos,
Speaker 3: you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, We'll come back
Speaker 3: to our friend, Carlos. We'd only have about thirty seconds
Speaker 3: from anywhere. Here's the deal. Lines are jammed. Everybody on
Speaker 3: the line. I'm going to get you on air, hopefully
Speaker 3: everybody in the next segment. Texts are exploding, as they
Speaker 3: should be. Hey, come on, this is one of the
Speaker 3: most important wildest times in American history. If you just
Speaker 3: joined us, thank you, But the news of the day
Speaker 3: you may have gathered. President Trump says, no third debate,
Speaker 3: and we'll play that sound for you as well.
Speaker 2: Good move, bad move, weak, strong. I think it's brilliant.
Speaker 3: Some others, and including others who want them to win, disagree.
Speaker 3: Eight five five four zero five eight two five five
Speaker 3: the number you cond text d An five seven seven
Speaker 3: three nine. So we'll come back and we will dive
Speaker 3: all into that, and many text along these lines, Dan,
Speaker 3: Would there be any advantage for Trump having a second
Speaker 3: debate on Fox News of moderators being Jesse and Sean?
Speaker 3: I still don't think so. In first Harris would never
Speaker 3: agree to that, right, but I still don't think so,
Speaker 3: because she failed to do what she needed to do.
Speaker 3: The arc of the races toured to Trump victory, and
Speaker 3: now all the attention is going to be on her record.
Speaker 3: Why would you want to distract from all this great Ammo,
Speaker 3: all this great video you have to put out there
Speaker 3: in the Swing states right now? Don't distract from that
Speaker 3: show the people who she really is, in her own words,
Speaker 3: that's what she fears.
Speaker 2: Don't take her off the hook. You're on the Dane
Speaker 2: Kapla show. Islam Terrorism and the greatest victims of terror
Speaker 2: also have the very string.
Speaker 3: Illegal alien boy Kamala Harris saying we must ree that
Speaker 3: term radical Islamic terrorism.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 3: And another This is probably the biggest reason among many
Speaker 3: good ones that that Trump wisely is not going to
Speaker 3: distract from from the truth of Kamala Harris with a
Speaker 3: third debate is they've got so much AMMO that proves
Speaker 3: who she really is, and he just he needs to
Speaker 3: get it out there. The reason she wants this debate is, Ay,
Speaker 3: she knows she didn't do what she had to do
Speaker 3: the other night, and b it would distract from what
Speaker 3: is to come now. It's hey, it's an open playing field,
Speaker 3: right and Trump can use it now to use all
Speaker 3: of this video everything to show these swing state voters
Speaker 3: who she really is. Let's go back to the phone lines.
Speaker 3: Let's start up in up beautiful for Collins. What a
Speaker 3: night it is going to be up there on Saturday night.
Speaker 3: Shannon Scott, who's in for Ryan today, and I were
Speaker 3: talking about it. We're both going to be up there.
Speaker 3: Shannon works the buff games for Kowa. I'm going to
Speaker 3: be up there just as a fan. It is going
Speaker 3: to be an amazing evening. David, you're on the Dan
Speaker 3: Kaplas show.
Speaker 10: Welcome, Hey, Dan, love you, bro. But you are just
Speaker 10: so off base on who won the debate, because listen,
Speaker 10: I love frum policies. I admire his strength. I get
Speaker 10: frustrated by his lack of temperament, but by any metric,
Speaker 10: she won, And I'll tell you, I'll explain it from
Speaker 10: a different perspective. Do you believe they came out of
Speaker 10: it at a draw first? I don't attempt that, but
Speaker 10: even if I did. The point is that Trump had
Speaker 10: virtually every issue on his side, with the exception of abortion.
Speaker 10: He didn't prosecute those those at all. Instead, he would
Speaker 10: make these generalized rambling ramps. When she brings up when
Speaker 10: they talk about illegal immigration, he could have turned to
Speaker 10: her and said, you're the one who said you wanted
Speaker 10: to deep from the legal border crossing. You don't want
Speaker 10: to detain people coming here illegally, you want to defund ice.
Speaker 10: That would have been hard, hard facts an abortion. When
Speaker 10: she's hitting him on abortion, he should have turned to
Speaker 10: her and said, would you accept legislation outline third term abortions,
Speaker 10: since you claim they don't happen. Yet, he would have
Speaker 10: put some meat on the bone. He would have buried her.
Speaker 10: But instead he missed at every turn.
Speaker 2: He sure missed a lot. And if he had hit
Speaker 2: maybe half of those.
Speaker 3: Low hanging curveballs, right, if you had hit even half
Speaker 3: of those, then he would bidanize her and the Democrats
Speaker 3: would be talking about whether they could replace her today.
Speaker 3: I agree with all of that, But the metric I
Speaker 3: used to judge the debate and who won and who
Speaker 3: lost is who is tracking to win the presidency after
Speaker 3: the debate. So to me, a win in that debait
Speaker 3: isn't oh stylistically, did she exceed expectations and appear to
Speaker 3: perform better than him that night? If that's the metric,
Speaker 3: then sure she did. But if the metric of winning
Speaker 3: the debate is who comes out tracking to win the presidency,
Speaker 3: then I believe he clearly won.
Speaker 10: And here's what I disagree.
Speaker 2: Okay, okay, what do you see? What do you see?
Speaker 3: What do you see in the polling now that suggests
Speaker 3: that she has changed the arc?
Speaker 10: Right now, the current polling suggests that the race remains
Speaker 10: evenly tied, at least at least on a national basis.
Speaker 3: Okay, So do you agree that she didn't move the needle? Right,
Speaker 3: you agree she did not move the needle.
Speaker 10: Okay, This could have been Trump's opportunity, sure to totally
Speaker 10: bury her.
Speaker 5: And he hid.
Speaker 9: Right, Okay, that's a win.
Speaker 3: Well no, and listen, yes, compared to being annihilated in
Speaker 3: her own party now wanting her out of the race,
Speaker 3: Sure it is. But but I think you need to
Speaker 3: be more balanced and at the same time, you need
Speaker 3: to acknowledge there was no major gaff from Trump that
Speaker 3: was going to allow her to open it up, that
Speaker 3: was going to allow her to change the arc. And
Speaker 3: I know you disagree with my premise that he's arcing
Speaker 3: toward victory before the debate, but I think he clearly
Speaker 3: was at least Nate Silver from the left believed he
Speaker 3: was with a sixty percent chance to win to her
Speaker 3: forty percent.
Speaker 2: But so that.
Speaker 3: There was no major gaff. There was no major gaff,
Speaker 3: and it's normally big gaffs that that changed the arc
Speaker 3: of the race. There was none of that. He did
Speaker 3: hit some subjects I thought very effectively. He kept coming
Speaker 3: back to immigration. I think he did very well on war,
Speaker 3: versus peace. I think he did some things very effectively
Speaker 3: temperament wise, you know, he kept it relatively under control
Speaker 3: given you know, the very unfair environment he was in
Speaker 3: that night. So I don't think you're giving him enough
Speaker 3: credit for.
Speaker 5: What he did, right, I disagree them.
Speaker 10: Can I sell you something real quick going off subject
Speaker 10: that something I think you're going to want to hear.
Speaker 10: I'm the guy that called in I don't know last
Speaker 10: November that my friend and her daughter had been abducted
Speaker 10: by Hamas on October seventh and asked you, asked your
Speaker 10: your listeners to pray for her, telling you there was
Speaker 10: a miracle because she and her daughter to the Fernanda
Speaker 10: daughter Natalie, were the first two hospitals really, so interestingly,
Speaker 10: she came out here to visit, not to Occo, and
Speaker 10: she opened up to us a bit. She's still got
Speaker 10: a lot of PTSD. Yeah, but she told us that
Speaker 10: after they were abducted across the border, they were taken
Speaker 10: to the HAMAS command center in a large hospital and
Speaker 10: as they were paraded, they and the other hostages were
Speaker 10: prayed inside the nurses and other staff gathered around and
Speaker 10: were trilling in celebrations. So I just wanted to that
Speaker 10: out there, the Hamas propagandas that they own. They're not
Speaker 10: in hospitals, schools, most they are.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, David.
Speaker 10: The Palestinians are poor victims. They don't support us. That's
Speaker 10: not the reality.
Speaker 3: Well, thank god she's free, thank god. Yeah, thank you, Hey, David,
Speaker 3: appreciate the call.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
Speaker 3: the number. Let's go to Charlie in Arvada. You're on
Speaker 3: the Dane Caplis Show.
Speaker 9: Well, okay, I'm good with that.
Speaker 2: Charlie. How you doing? My friend?
Speaker 3: Looks like Charlie may be otherwise occupied at the moment,
Speaker 3: which will let me get to some of these mountains
Speaker 3: of text here.
Speaker 2: Dan, I think it was a mistake.
Speaker 3: I believe you should have said, fine, Fox News or
Speaker 3: Newsmax or any other conservative outlet. It looks like he's
Speaker 3: turning tail and running well. But but please understand, I
Speaker 3: understand the desire to want to see another debate where
Speaker 3: where you know he comes in better prepared and and
Speaker 3: the moderators have to be have to to be at
Speaker 3: least somewhat more appropriate than they were the other night,
Speaker 3: because we all want to see him be able to
Speaker 3: take those shots that he didn't take the other night.
Speaker 2: I get that.
Speaker 3: But if the idea is to win the presidency, that
Speaker 3: then understand if he agrees to another debate, he looks
Speaker 3: weaker than he looks by saying no to a third debate,
Speaker 3: because when you say no to a third debate, you
Speaker 3: can say, hey, the only reason she wants another one
Speaker 3: is she lost, right, and that resonates with people's common sense.
Speaker 3: It's like I try cases. I've had the privilege of
Speaker 3: trying cases for forty years up to do another forty
Speaker 3: and I know that for a truth to prevail, it
Speaker 3: has to mesh with the jurors common sense, and that
Speaker 3: meshes with common sense. Yeah, the reason she wants another
Speaker 3: debate is she knows she lost. If she thought that
Speaker 3: she had won and done what she needed, why would
Speaker 3: she want to take that chance. So if he was
Speaker 3: to agree to this third debate, Texter, at that point,
Speaker 3: Democrats don't say, oh, yeah, thank you, Trump did the
Speaker 3: right thing. They say, look how weak Trump is. He
Speaker 3: knows he lost.
Speaker 2: That's why he's begging for another debate.
Speaker 3: So no, No, let the focus be on her now,
Speaker 3: because the more the focus is on the truth about
Speaker 3: her unprotected by moderators with your opportunity now, think about it,
Speaker 3: Think about what she's staring at. This debate came so early,
Speaker 3: and I understand mal ballots have gone out here and there, etc.
Speaker 3: But election day itself still a long way away. Debate
Speaker 3: came out so early, that's going to be forgotten. All
Speaker 3: the focus now is going to be on her true
Speaker 3: record and the statement she's made. She knows that's deadly
Speaker 3: for her. She would love nothing more than to set
Speaker 3: another debate to try to distract from that. And on
Speaker 3: top of that, my friend, and then we'll come back
Speaker 3: to our phone lines in great text. On top of that,
Speaker 3: and I'm not saying it's going to be monumental, but
Speaker 3: you have the vice presidential debate coming up, and you
Speaker 3: know jd. Vance is going to clean that goofball's clock right,
Speaker 3: And it won't have the same kind of impact a
Speaker 3: presidential would, but without a third debate hanging out there,
Speaker 3: it's going to get more attention than it otherwise would.
Speaker 3: And that's going to be a tremendous opportunity to expose
Speaker 3: how far left Harrison Walls are. So don't forget that
Speaker 3: VP debate you're on the Dan Kapla show President Trump
Speaker 3: in Arizona today.
Speaker 2: There will be no third debate.
Speaker 1: Too late.
Speaker 4: Anyway, the voting has already begun. You've got to go
Speaker 4: out and vote.
Speaker 2: We got to vote.
Speaker 4: We're this is going to be the most important vote
Speaker 4: in the history of our country.
Speaker 2: It will be the most important.
Speaker 4: People said that I was angry at the debate.
Speaker 2: Angry.
Speaker 4: I was angry, And yes, I am angry because he
Speaker 4: allowed twenty one million illegal aliens invading our communities. Many
Speaker 4: of them are criminals, many are criminals. I'm angry. They said,
Speaker 4: he's an angry person. Now they're destroying our country. I
Speaker 4: don't like she's smiling. Well, practice right, did you see it?
Speaker 5: She's like it?
Speaker 3: And then he went on with that team and Shannon
Speaker 3: Scott the icon and today Ryan's sick. Shannon had edited
Speaker 3: out a bunch of applause just so we could get
Speaker 3: to that sounds sooner. Thank you for that, Shannon. So
Speaker 3: I think this is tremendous messaging. You know, it's righteous anger.
Speaker 3: If you can't get angry over all of these bad
Speaker 3: things that are happening because of them, because of Biden
Speaker 3: and Harris, well then there's something wrong with you, because
Speaker 3: righteous anger. If you don't get angry at injustice, there
Speaker 3: is something wrong with you, and we need that righteous anger. Obviously,
Speaker 3: it has to be controlled upright within the bounds of
Speaker 3: the law. But if you can't get angry at some
Speaker 3: of this stuff they're doing, then you don't care. Tracy
Speaker 3: and Colorado Springs lines are jams. You're on the Dan
Speaker 3: Kapla show.
Speaker 2: Welcome.
Speaker 11: Oh, hello, thank you for taking my call. I wanted
Speaker 11: to make a I was thinking about my parents are
Speaker 11: extremely liberal.
Speaker 8: My mom is a.
Speaker 11: Very old school women's right aft to this type person.
Speaker 7: And what I.
Speaker 11: Feel, I'm just feeling this is very unfortunate. But I
Speaker 11: believe that I'm just hoping this is not to be true.
Speaker 11: But I believe many of the what call themselves maybe
Speaker 11: moderate or that are just been democratic, you know, a
Speaker 11: Democrat for many years. They're very, very focused on this
Speaker 11: abortion issue and they're like blinded of anything else. And
Speaker 11: like my mom literally said, I'm just it's so historic
Speaker 11: and I'm just so proud to cast my vote for
Speaker 11: the first woman, you know, so she's all about that.
Speaker 11: And then I think many people are this whole, you know,
Speaker 11: they're not looking at this whole. This pro choice movement
Speaker 11: I think is very prominent even with moderate Democrats, and
Speaker 11: I and how she was very much on the her
Speaker 11: soapbox about being abortion pro abortion and da da da
Speaker 11: da Dad. Unfortunately, I think this is going to make
Speaker 11: a big impact, and I'm really hoping that doesn't fly
Speaker 11: the skills over to them and how it could erase
Speaker 11: all the terrible things that have happened over the last
Speaker 11: three and a half years. That people are very focused
Speaker 11: and they're probing those emotions, like they're very emotionally driven
Speaker 11: about that one subject, and it's like blinding them from
Speaker 11: anything else that's happening.
Speaker 3: Thank you for that, Tracy, And you're right to be
Speaker 3: concerned about that. And in the end it could lead
Speaker 3: to a Harris victory. I don't believe it will, and
Speaker 3: I think the polls are reflecting that that you have
Speaker 3: so much intensity of support for President Trump for lots
Speaker 3: of reasons, including among folks who don't normally vote. I
Speaker 3: think it's sixteen all over again, and you're going to
Speaker 3: see a massive turnout, a massive turnout swamp these other concerns.
Speaker 3: But you are right to be You are right to
Speaker 3: be concerned about that. Dave, you're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2: Welcome.
Speaker 7: Yeah, Dan, thanks for taking my First of all, I
Speaker 7: am a Trump supporter, and the next thing is, I
Speaker 7: do think he should debate. And the main reason is
Speaker 7: I do believe the polls he's ahead. But I don't
Speaker 7: know why he wouldn't want to increase his lead even more,
Speaker 7: particularly when it would be you know, supporters from Fox,
Speaker 7: because he's always said that, you know, he doesn't speak
Speaker 7: with anybody fair from the media, and I agree with this,
Speaker 7: but this would really give him an opportunity to expose her, right, Yeah,
Speaker 7: I mean because they will ask good follow up questions,
Speaker 7: and of course that's with what's been lacking through this
Speaker 7: whole process.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Dave, appreciate the call. Thank you, my friend. I
Speaker 3: know many Trump supporters agree with you on that. I
Speaker 3: personally feel otherwise for the reasons I mentioned. But Jim
Speaker 3: in Denver, you're on the Dan Kaplash Welcome.
Speaker 9: Perfect logic and disagree with anything.
Speaker 3: Oh I wish i'd hear that from my wife.
Speaker 9: I did disagree with President Trump. That was not a
Speaker 9: smile and her face is like the Manedan Dez brothers
Speaker 9: being gripped their their sentence because they killed her parents
Speaker 9: a stupid, mindless smirk.
Speaker 3: I don't agree with that, my friend, But but I
Speaker 3: don't think I think that she alienated as many people
Speaker 3: as she got excited about.
Speaker 9: Her I agree there too, Yeah, yeah, and maybe more,
Speaker 9: maybe more, But isn't the bottom line, Jim.
Speaker 3: She didn't get it done what she had to get
Speaker 3: done that night was convinced these swing voters that her
Speaker 3: change in beliefs was true, her change in position was sincere,
Speaker 3: and why she had changed her position.
Speaker 2: She never even touched that.
Speaker 9: Yeah, and I also made discreet. You think her personal
Speaker 9: behavior and actions and manners, and I think she'd hurt herself.
Speaker 3: I think it depends on who you're talking about, Jim.
Speaker 3: Appreciate the call, thank you. I think she hurt herself
Speaker 3: with some people, helped herself with others. But I think
Speaker 3: you got to come back to the big engines, the
Speaker 3: big drivers, right, and the big things she needed to
Speaker 3: do was to explain your change in positions, because come on,
Speaker 3: vast majority of people are going to not believe that,
Speaker 3: are going to think she's just claiming to have changed
Speaker 3: your position. So she needed to persuade on that and
Speaker 3: convince she didn't do it. She also did nothing to
Speaker 3: suggest she would be different than Biden, and people are
Speaker 3: obviously ready to move on from what they've experienced under Biden.
Speaker 3: Charlie and Arvada. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 8: Welcome, Hey, Dan, Thank you.
Speaker 5: Hey.
Speaker 8: I think that Dan, that Trump could have said, yeah,
Speaker 8: I'll go to the next I'll do another debate, but
Speaker 8: it's going to be on my terms, and that means
Speaker 8: my moderators, my network, and she would have knocked out
Speaker 8: of it and they would called her bluff and she
Speaker 8: would have failed.
Speaker 2: Thank you for that, Charlie.
Speaker 3: My concern with that, which a lot of smart people
Speaker 3: agree with you and have suggested, is even that conversation
Speaker 3: distracts now from the focus on Harris. The more focus
Speaker 3: on her, what she said in the past, who she
Speaker 3: really is the better great joption and great to work
Speaker 3: with you.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Kelly. Please join us tomorrow