Speaker 1: On the CaCO Day radio program Wednesday, Glad to have
Speaker 1: you along. Something pretty interesting happened yesterday. And I know
Speaker 1: that I know some there are some clips that are
Speaker 1: gonna get you know, they're gonna get the well, I mean,
Speaker 1: I've already seen it. Obviously, they're the ones who are
Speaker 1: going to get the circulating on the social media. But
Speaker 1: there's there's something that's far more fascinating in that stack,
Speaker 1: and I want to I want to kind of open
Speaker 1: there and make sure I get into this audio, probably
Speaker 1: a couple times here during the show. So we're do
Speaker 1: one right now. You probably saw Trump was at an
Speaker 1: event that Bloomberg was hosting. They had their Muckety muck.
Speaker 1: They're doing the interview and look, people are like, oh,
Speaker 1: it was super comfort I don't think it was super confrontational,
Speaker 1: not considering who you're interviewing. The crowd scened in on it,
Speaker 1: and well, yes, and we'll play the audio. John Micklethwaite Micklethwaite,
Speaker 1: I don't know how to pronounce his last name, don't care.
Speaker 1: He's the editor in chief for the news for Bloomberg. Also, uh,
Speaker 1: he has uh let's see where was he said? It
Speaker 1: was the economic Club of Chicago. You had folks from
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal there, Bloomberg business leaders, you name it, okay,
Speaker 1: and they you know, so they're going to talk economics.
Speaker 1: And I think it went swimmingly well for Trump. And
Speaker 1: I'll explain why. But let's let's just go ahead and
Speaker 1: dip into a couple of the moments, shall we. First
Speaker 1: and foremost, the Federal Reserve. I know you guys are
Speaker 1: all big fans of the the FED. Even those of
Speaker 1: you who who think we should have a FED, you're
Speaker 1: probably not big fans of him. So of course this
Speaker 1: is going to be an applause line. But some of
Speaker 1: this is real interesting. All right, let's get into that.
Speaker 2: I think it's the greatest job in government.
Speaker 1: You start to show up to the office once a month,
Speaker 1: and all right, just sill, we're clear.
Speaker 2: I think it's the greatest job in government.
Speaker 3: You show up to the office once a month and
Speaker 3: you say, let's say.
Speaker 2: Flip aical, and everybody talks about you like you're a god.
Speaker 2: Oh what will he do?
Speaker 3: I mean, before the guy used to walk into my office,
Speaker 3: he was like the beg and f he was.
Speaker 4: He was fine, you did you did talk about I
Speaker 4: mean you talked about removing him once.
Speaker 2: I did because he was keeping the ridge too high,
Speaker 2: and I was right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I thought. People are like, no, you weren't right
Speaker 1: really under the store. I mean, it's a combination of things,
Speaker 1: don't get me wrong, but yeah, I think he kind
Speaker 1: of was. And then you got to ask yourself why,
Speaker 1: you know, what are they trying to stave off? And
Speaker 1: if it's something worse, did policy And that's fine.
Speaker 3: So this is.
Speaker 1: Surface level stuff, but first person examples like how did
Speaker 1: you handle this during your first presidency, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: if you are trying to figure out who you're going
Speaker 1: to vote for, that's a pretty good thing. You have
Speaker 1: real world in office experience for both of them, obviously,
Speaker 1: one at president, one at vice president. It's not inappropriate
Speaker 1: to look at those things. Uh, okay, let's continue.
Speaker 2: This is the Wall Street general that they've been wrong
Speaker 2: about everything, so have you.
Speaker 4: By the way, you're trying to turn this you're trying
Speaker 4: to turn this, No, you're trying to turn you are
Speaker 4: trying to turn this into debate. Doesn't there are business
Speaker 4: people there are You're wrong, You've.
Speaker 2: Been wrong, You've been wrong all your life on this stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and his holy oh, you're trying to turn this adversarial.
Speaker 1: You're you're members of the media. It is adversarial by nature,
Speaker 1: and it might have been appropriate at one time to
Speaker 1: sit there and go, you know, so politician who wants
Speaker 1: to attack the messenger and not the message. The problem
Speaker 1: is when there's all these messengers and they get the
Speaker 1: message wrong over and over. It's a different dynamic, man,
Speaker 1: It's a different dynamic, sou And you heard the crowd.
Speaker 1: They didn't seem to mind. But what was fascinating and
Speaker 1: why we're here, why we're doing this? Or actually hold
Speaker 1: on one more? U the the newsome thing, so you know,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump nicknames people we do it here on
Speaker 1: the show as Senator Slenderman, and uh he used one
Speaker 1: of them. Of course the guy tries to correct him
Speaker 1: and I don't know, didn't.
Speaker 2: Go Wavin Newscomb.
Speaker 3: He's the governor of California. He signed Newscomb I him.
Speaker 2: But do you do you think direct corrected?
Speaker 4: There is the first time there are CEOs out here.
Speaker 4: If they said those sort of things about a rival CEO, they.
Speaker 2: Would be signed.
Speaker 4: They'd be signed.
Speaker 2: Do you think they don't have to purvive like me?
Speaker 2: They don't have to go through what I have to
Speaker 2: go through.
Speaker 3: There's never been a president that's been treated like me,
Speaker 3: so I have to fight my own roles.
Speaker 1: Do you made it? Although the one thing that I
Speaker 1: did take away from that that I thought was funny
Speaker 1: is there there was some state a state assembly man
Speaker 1: or something in California who claimed that it was Trump
Speaker 1: was calling him a sexualized name to demean him. You
Speaker 1: know that what he's saying is new scum, right. You
Speaker 1: didn't even you didn't even wonder why nobody else was
Speaker 1: saying that. Just you, sir, it's your head out the gutter,
Speaker 1: all right. No, here's the fascinating part. And you know
Speaker 1: that one of the things Trump's talked about is tariffs,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna get you a nice, big, old quick
Speaker 1: two minute lesson on tariffs here, in which I think
Speaker 1: is frankly, is absolutely shareable and you should you should
Speaker 1: know this stuff. But let's uh, and that's going to
Speaker 1: be from a different guest, one of the one of
Speaker 1: the business guys. But I want you to hear Trump
Speaker 1: talking about it and specifically ways that he feels the
Speaker 1: American worker, America in general, and even the American consumers
Speaker 1: getting taken for a ride here.
Speaker 2: We're going to put tariffs on them. They're going to do.
Speaker 1: And this is auto parts. Okay, that starts this conversation,
Speaker 1: but it obviously goes deeper.
Speaker 3: We're going to put tariffs on them, and they're going
Speaker 3: to do and you know what they can do, and
Speaker 3: Mercedes Benz will start building in the United States and
Speaker 3: they have a little bit, but you know what they
Speaker 3: really are assembled like in South Carolina. But they build
Speaker 3: everything in Germany and then they assemble it here. They
Speaker 3: get away with murder because they say, oh, yes, we're building.
Speaker 3: Because theyn't build cart they take them out of a
Speaker 3: box and they assemble them.
Speaker 2: We can have our child do.
Speaker 1: Yeah, are they one hundred percent build here?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: Do they do meet in some cases the bare minimum,
Speaker 1: in many cases more than the bare minimum of what
Speaker 1: it requires for you not to have to pay an
Speaker 1: import fee. Absolutely, that is absolutely. But the bigger issue
Speaker 1: is and one more Trump cut and then we'll talk
Speaker 1: about the bigger issue. It doesn't It still doesn't mean
Speaker 1: there's a level playing field. Yes, there are jobs associated
Speaker 1: with that. That's why state officials would chase these manufacturers
Speaker 1: around and offer them the moon while business owners in
Speaker 1: North Carolina sit there and go, I'm sorry, I would
Speaker 1: like a ten year never have to pay tax situation
Speaker 1: on my business. That'd be phenomenal. Yeah, but you're not new.
Speaker 1: So the tariff discussion continues.
Speaker 4: Tariffs also have another side. Isn't that something that you
Speaker 4: have to acknowledge that you could be plunging America into
Speaker 4: the biggest trade warf smoothall but you're gonna stop. You're
Speaker 4: gonna there are tariffs already.
Speaker 2: There are no terriffs.
Speaker 3: All you have to do is build a plant in
Speaker 3: the United States and you don't have any tariffs.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, So that's the romanticized version of it.
Speaker 1: But what's the reality? You have heard no doubt that
Speaker 1: if if Trump comes in and he does any any terror,
Speaker 1: even though there are tariffs, right, those currently exist in
Speaker 1: a lot of places. But if he comes in and
Speaker 1: he uses tariffs as a tool, it will single handedly
Speaker 1: destroy the American economy and that'll be the end of us. Right,
Speaker 1: you've heard all of it. Remember they had the letter
Speaker 1: from the Oh we got thirty five economists sign this letter.
Speaker 1: Oh good, you found thirty five of a thing that
Speaker 1: agree on an issue within a thing out of how
Speaker 1: many economists, including Nobel Prize winning economists previously, who understand
Speaker 1: tariffs obviously better than you. Case in point, as that's
Speaker 1: going on, see NBC is interviewing some of these business dudes. Man,
Speaker 1: and I got to tell you, I think that there
Speaker 1: is a very good two minute how would I say
Speaker 1: this basically two minute sorry, but move that over here.
Speaker 1: Two minute breakdown of you know, how tariffs work and
Speaker 1: how they can be used selectively to go ahead and
Speaker 1: bring it back. And by the way, and this is
Speaker 1: Howard Lutnick. By the way, he's a billionaire, and you know,
Speaker 1: so this is this is a guy who's pondered tariffs
Speaker 1: and his position in the in the geo political and
Speaker 1: global economic realm. I mean, this is the guy who
Speaker 1: plays it, and he probably goes to Davos, but I
Speaker 1: think he does a fantastic job of laying this out
Speaker 1: so when you hear it like this, and I really
Speaker 1: wish Trump could hear could say it like this, and
Speaker 1: he probably could, even though he's a little wandery, or
Speaker 1: bring Lutnick out and put this guy in front of him.
Speaker 1: This is going to be the easiest to understand our
Speaker 1: argument and the best argument. Here we go, and of
Speaker 1: course it's a bargaining hip.
Speaker 6: We can sell a Ford or GM in Europe.
Speaker 1: You go to all right, that's true. I mean we
Speaker 1: can sell them, but there's a reason nobody buys them
Speaker 1: for the most part. With certain exceptions.
Speaker 6: Europe, you can't sell Ford a GM. Why there's one
Speaker 6: hundred percent tariffs? How about in Japan one hundred percent tarffs.
Speaker 6: So do you think if we said we're going to
Speaker 6: tarify you the way you tarrify us. Do you think
Speaker 6: they're going to allow Mercedes and all these Japanese companies
Speaker 6: and Porsches and BMW's to all of a sudden, I
Speaker 6: have one hundred percent taffs in America.
Speaker 7: Of course not.
Speaker 6: They're going to come and negotiate and their taffs are
Speaker 6: going to come down, and finally Ford and General Motors
Speaker 6: are going to be able to sell in these places.
Speaker 1: How does that sound?
Speaker 7: Of course they're going to come down.
Speaker 1: But what you're hearing, by the way, is you're hearing
Speaker 1: the host. Now this is CNBC, So it's not MSNBC,
Speaker 1: it's not NBC even there's you know, there are folks
Speaker 1: over there. There's a broader political but not a ton.
Speaker 1: But you're hearing a guy who is challenging him on
Speaker 1: tariffs who hasn't been a fan of tariffs listening to
Speaker 1: him and going, you know what, that's not fair? What
Speaker 1: is now? Why is? Then he's going to explain why?
Speaker 1: But why is it that if Ford wants to do
Speaker 1: something over there one hundred percent tariff, but Japan can
Speaker 1: send you know, stuff over here with a by much
Speaker 1: more minimal tariff, or they can simply assemble part of
Speaker 1: it and negate the tariff entirely. So how did we
Speaker 1: get here? And Lieutnant goes on to explain it.
Speaker 8: Of course, it absolutely makes sense if you do it strategically.
Speaker 8: If it's across the board, it creates a real problem.
Speaker 8: And the question is whether you believe the president is
Speaker 8: going to do it strategically or across the board.
Speaker 1: He keeps saying that's uh, I don't know. Does that
Speaker 1: sound like goalpost moving? Because it can, and it does
Speaker 1: to me. I haven't heard Trump say that he's going
Speaker 1: to come in and tear if everything. In fact, he
Speaker 1: tends to point at five or six what he refers
Speaker 1: to his unfair situations, stuff with China, the stuff with
Speaker 1: Japan and yeah, the automotive stuff over in Europe. He's
Speaker 1: been pretty consistent on this stuff. It's not the totality
Speaker 1: of it, but it does seem to be the main,
Speaker 1: main thing. And what he's talking about is a negotiating position,
Speaker 1: and that sounds like a pretty strong one. How many
Speaker 1: BMWs me, how many German or Japanese brands do you
Speaker 1: see popping around on the freeway every morning? They're covered
Speaker 1: in it? Hell, I've owned one, some of you own
Speaker 1: one right now. That's a mind that's that is too
Speaker 1: big to sit there and just go, oh, Trump did this,
Speaker 1: or's something we can do. That's how you negotiate. That's
Speaker 1: how NATO teachs in the largest amount of donations ever
Speaker 1: the year following Trump saying you better pay more. We're
Speaker 1: out all right now. The reason here we go it
Speaker 1: across the board.
Speaker 6: Well, when you're running for office, you make broad statements
Speaker 6: where people understand you. Okay, tariffs are an amazing tool
Speaker 6: by the president to use.
Speaker 2: They're an amazing tool.
Speaker 6: But he understands, don't tariff's stuff we don't make.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 6: If we don't make it and you want to buy it,
Speaker 6: I don't want to put the price up there, it's pointless.
Speaker 6: But use tariffs to build in American if we want
Speaker 6: to make it in America tariffic or if we're competing.
Speaker 1: With the taffic. But you got to remember, we need.
Speaker 6: To protect the American worker. Finally someone's going to protect
Speaker 6: the American worker, and Donald Trump is here to protecting
Speaker 6: American We're.
Speaker 10: A lot of money in tariffs, or if they're used
Speaker 10: as negotiating tactics.
Speaker 2: Look, tariffs will come down there.
Speaker 10: We're not going to have super high tariffs here either.
Speaker 2: There's not gonna be a big pot of money. At
Speaker 2: the end of I love that.
Speaker 6: Story, which is do we make a lot of money
Speaker 6: on times or we bring productivity here and we drive
Speaker 6: up our workers here, so it's a win win scenario.
Speaker 1: I like both of them, all right, And he goes
Speaker 1: on to explain how we ended up in this situation
Speaker 1: over in Japan, specifically with the Marshall Plan and the
Speaker 1: Marshall Plan, I guess, just because I have a minute
Speaker 1: here is very simple. Basically, post World War Two, in
Speaker 1: an effort to help Japan, rebuild Germany, rebuild Italy a
Speaker 1: couple other places, we essentially agreed that we wouldn't tear
Speaker 1: if their products and they could extensively tear iff us,
Speaker 1: And we did that as rather than just giving them
Speaker 1: piles of money. Right, if the more money will come in,
Speaker 1: the more you're manufacturing picks up, the more effort you
Speaker 1: put in, you're using the US economy to restabilize yours.
Speaker 1: That was the Marshal That was well, it was part
Speaker 1: of it, and that's something that continues today. Do you
Speaker 1: think we need the Marshall Plan right now post World
Speaker 1: War two reconstruction with economic vampurism. I don't, And I
Speaker 1: think most people when Japan's doing just fine, you should
Speaker 1: go there other than a whole streamers running around but
Speaker 1: otherwise doing Okay, we'll be back wherever you are on it.
Speaker 1: We'll tweet out links to the videos, so at Casey
Speaker 1: on the radio. But the reason I hit you with
Speaker 1: all that is I didn't feel it was fair to
Speaker 1: punish you with clips from the view at six oh five,
Speaker 1: go ahead say you're welcome, Okay, thank you. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't want to do that to you. But at six
Speaker 1: thirty five, yeah, we'll go ahead and do that to you.
Speaker 1: Oh man, where do we even start? Well, the view
Speaker 1: be in the view, and there's two that are just
Speaker 1: so juicy. We have to get into. One of these is.
Speaker 1: One of these may shut down your will to do
Speaker 1: anything today because you'll give up on society. But I
Speaker 1: want you to be strong. Okay, let me play the
Speaker 1: Let me play the friendlier one. If there is such
Speaker 1: a thing, the less how this is the less crazy one,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I think you'll agree that it is.
Speaker 1: And for that we go to Joey Bayhart. Go ahead, Joy,
Speaker 1: take us away.
Speaker 2: It only says something.
Speaker 10: I was watching interviews with MEGA supporters. They do not
Speaker 10: believe that he will do what he says He's going
Speaker 10: to Joe that is what we're up against. So if
Speaker 10: you say he is going to be dictator on day one,
Speaker 10: he wants to punish with it, with the Air Force,
Speaker 10: air forces, whatever we have, the armed forces. He wants
Speaker 10: to punish people who disagree with him, like people like us. Okay,
Speaker 10: And they say, oh, he's not gonna do that. He's
Speaker 10: going to take us out of NATO. No, he's not
Speaker 10: gonna do that. So it's very hard for us to
Speaker 10: talk to these people because they refuse to believe. And
Speaker 10: I guess they're hearing it on Fox or.
Speaker 1: Okay, so it's it's a little but there's a lot
Speaker 1: of balancing around there. But I want you to understand
Speaker 1: the key points of what she said. Trump says he's
Speaker 1: not gonna be a dictator. Mag of people believe it.
Speaker 1: Joy obviously does not believe it, and she believes that
Speaker 1: they're going to use the air force or the armed
Speaker 1: force or whatever we have to punish us.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: Do you know how the air force punishes groups of people? Ross?
Speaker 1: Are you familiar with this? You've ever seen a movie
Speaker 1: how the air Force chooses to do it, maybe turning
Speaker 1: the jungle phosphorus or yeah, Like, so, are you saying
Speaker 1: that they're going to bomb you? Are they saying they're
Speaker 1: going to put you in some sort of military camp?
Speaker 1: That's crazy, right, Nah, That's that's the simple thing. This
Speaker 1: next cut. There's so much bs going on here. I'm
Speaker 1: warning you you're gonna have a react. If you're one
Speaker 1: of those people that reacts to the TV or the radio,
Speaker 1: like physically or verbally, this is going to trigger you.
Speaker 1: You have been warned.
Speaker 10: But Trump, he won't even take questions from his own supporters.
Speaker 10: He starts dancing to you know, the time to say goodbye,
Speaker 10: and she will go into enemy territory. That shows you
Speaker 10: that she has more call.
Speaker 1: Okay, I gotta pause, right, okay, dude, Yeah.
Speaker 7: Dude, This cut is absolute lunacy. It's crazy until.
Speaker 1: A third of the cut. Third of it.
Speaker 7: So but she's saying this, well, he's on the air
Speaker 7: with the Bloomberg people.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, telling me, dude, he's full of crap,
Speaker 1: and then pointing in the audience to the other dudes
Speaker 1: and telling them they're all full of craph. Every interview,
Speaker 1: for the most part, Trump does is advers cerial and
Speaker 1: sometimes in an insane way. But also the part was
Speaker 1: show go into enemy territory.
Speaker 7: It's not where what could they call her daddy podcast,
Speaker 7: what the morning Zoo or whatever the hell?
Speaker 1: They react No, the reacting to the announcement that Brett
Speaker 1: Behar will interview her. But Brett Behar is a Fox personality,
Speaker 1: though if you remember, it was a Fox personality that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump said that if Fox did a debate, he
Speaker 1: didn't want Brett doing it. So I don't know fully
Speaker 1: what the beef is there. I mean, I kind of know,
Speaker 1: but I don't know if there's something newer.
Speaker 7: But The other part that that Trump doesn't answer questions
Speaker 7: but become Alla does is it's it.
Speaker 1: Was doing a talent, he was doing a town hall
Speaker 1: when there were medical emergencies and then the music that
Speaker 1: you know, all of that. There's a really easy way
Speaker 1: if you want to not fall into all of this
Speaker 1: as quickly as others who then are you know, got
Speaker 1: egg on their face. Block a couple Twitter accounts. Okay,
Speaker 1: block a couple of Twitter accounts with Kamala in the
Speaker 1: name Kamala hq, Kamala wins, and you'll avoid ninety percent
Speaker 1: of this crap because it's almost entirely bs.
Speaker 7: That I said before off the air have told you
Speaker 7: numerous times that Kamal hq account is probably.
Speaker 1: This is a ross is on multiple occasions. But oh,
Speaker 1: this account, it is the most gets to you man.
Speaker 7: Is the most deceptive lying account that I have ever come
Speaker 7: across of our political nature on Twitter, slash x it is,
Speaker 7: it's on steroids, it is whoever runs it is a
Speaker 7: complete lunatic moonbat. And it's just because also at the
Speaker 7: beginning that because she talks about Trump, does just dances
Speaker 7: the whole time. Yeah, during his and I you know,
Speaker 7: we talked about it yesterday briefly, because I didn't think
Speaker 7: it was going to be a thing where you had
Speaker 7: two medical emergencies in a crowd. He was going to
Speaker 7: play the song for a gold Star family, and he said, well,
Speaker 7: you know what we're gonna I'm gonna just play this
Speaker 7: song while they take care the person of the crowd
Speaker 7: because it's very hot. That person is attended to, then
Speaker 7: another person passes out, right, yeah, And then he said,
Speaker 7: if we.
Speaker 1: Had just kept trucking, it would have been neuro fiddles. Right,
Speaker 1: Let's just play a different version. So he plays the
Speaker 1: Pavarati version of the song when actually the lyrics in it,
Speaker 1: and they opened the door and they let the room
Speaker 1: cool out, and they're saying, oh, Trump had a cognitive issue.
Speaker 7: He's you know, he's like it's like Biden. He's like
Speaker 7: Biden all over again, and he's in mental decline. It is,
Speaker 7: you know, there were two medical emergencies.
Speaker 1: And the ABC used reporter who was there literally gave
Speaker 1: a report and didn't just debunk this, but said that
Speaker 1: after he did that, like everyone in the place was
Speaker 1: having a good time, and it become it became quote
Speaker 1: more intimate and Trump connected with his because they they've
Speaker 1: been told what's going on. They get what's up, and
Speaker 1: they're human, right, they don't want the person who's over
Speaker 1: there literally on the ground needing medical assistants to harm
Speaker 1: to come to them.
Speaker 7: Yeah, Axios said the same thing. Axio has had a
Speaker 7: big right upon it and actually mentioned that Twitter account,
Speaker 7: the kamala at HQ, and they were like, tay, these
Speaker 7: completely out of balance. That's now happened at all.
Speaker 1: Well, and before I go back and I'll play this again,
Speaker 1: what are those Bloomberg cuts that I played for you?
Speaker 1: They've already spun that, and it's this one right here.
Speaker 1: See if you can hear the problem. And then we'll
Speaker 1: go back to the crazy.
Speaker 3: We're going to put tariffs on them and they're going
Speaker 3: to do and you know what they can do. The
Speaker 3: Mercedes Benz will start building in the United States.
Speaker 2: And they have a little bit, but you know what
Speaker 2: they really are assembly like in South Carolina.
Speaker 3: But they build everything in Germany and then they assemble
Speaker 3: it here. They get away with murder because they say, oh, yes,
Speaker 3: we're building.
Speaker 2: Because they don't build her. They take them out of
Speaker 2: a box and they assemble them. We can have our.
Speaker 1: Child do all right, so you hear you hear it
Speaker 1: just happened there. I can't believe that he would choose
Speaker 1: to do that in the middle of this thing. That's uh,
Speaker 1: that's Donald Trump saying that auto workers are all children. Right.
Speaker 7: The job is so easy a child could do it
Speaker 7: because they take they take the rest of the audio,
Speaker 7: the video completely out and just played that last bit.
Speaker 7: And then you have what is it, the United Autoworkers
Speaker 7: of Michigan or whatever the union UW, we're you posting
Speaker 7: the Kamala account saying, oh look, Donald Trump is a scab.
Speaker 1: He's talking about how automotive companies manipulate this. And here's
Speaker 1: the other thing. The actual technical uh creation of a part,
Speaker 1: the rendering of a part, the milling of a part
Speaker 1: is different than the connecting of a part, but is
Speaker 1: also different than the testing of a part. So there's all.
Speaker 1: You know, there's various ranges of difficulty within all of
Speaker 1: these jobs, right, But that's not That's not what Trump's
Speaker 1: breaking down. He's breaking down this cookie cutter approach that
Speaker 1: all of these manufacturers take. Now, right, they figured out
Speaker 1: what the laws are, they figured out what the rules are,
Speaker 1: and they've decided to meet them by a by a hare.
Speaker 1: But they're also because they don't want to pay US
Speaker 1: autoworker wages. The main goal is to build it just
Speaker 1: enough to not get tariffed, but not so much that
Speaker 1: they have to pay even one penny more in US wages.
Speaker 1: So if you're the UAW and Trump's doing this, you
Speaker 1: should like this a lot, am I right? I mean
Speaker 1: that's if you just pause and think about you should
Speaker 1: like this a lot because the probability is there's going
Speaker 1: to be more jobs for you, and if you actually
Speaker 1: believe in any supply and demanded. Though it is a
Speaker 1: manipulated labor market with the way that the UAW works.
Speaker 11: But.
Speaker 1: Ultimately this is a good thing for you. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't believe that account. All Right, back to the
Speaker 1: Trump ladies, because we're we just we just got the
Speaker 1: first part and it will get increasingly harder to not
Speaker 1: punch a brand new hole in your wall. Okay, you've
Speaker 1: been warning, but Trump.
Speaker 10: He won't even take questions from his own supporters. He
Speaker 10: starts dancing to you know, the time to say goodbye yea,
Speaker 10: and she will go into enemy territory. That shows you
Speaker 10: that she has more cough.
Speaker 12: What it's the thing, And this is for all the
Speaker 12: women in the audience. Women are forced to go into
Speaker 12: places constantly where people don't always welcome you.
Speaker 1: Who's who's forcing her to do anything? It's clear you
Speaker 1: can't remember how they tried to get her to go
Speaker 1: to the border.
Speaker 7: But even if it's true exactly, but even if it's true,
Speaker 7: if Kamala Harris is being forced to go on Fox
Speaker 7: News and she's going, what kind of a leader is that?
Speaker 7: Because she's bending pretty quickly there are you ready?
Speaker 12: Don't no, No, there's still more so she understands what
Speaker 12: this is.
Speaker 2: She gets it.
Speaker 12: And thank god for you man who are here in
Speaker 12: our audience who aren't afraid to come here and hear
Speaker 12: what we're doing.
Speaker 1: So thank you. I suspect some of them are staring
Speaker 1: at you like, I don't know, like a side show,
Speaker 1: so I wouldn't thank them all.
Speaker 5: Thank you to.
Speaker 12: Grett Bear, yeah to saying yes, and to Joe Robyn
Speaker 12: for saying yes.
Speaker 2: Thank you for that. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Is that confirmed? Is the Rogan thing confirmed?
Speaker 7: I don't do if she goes.
Speaker 1: I saw the Trump and her like saying this, as
Speaker 1: I know, if it's confirmed, I'm sorry, go ahead me
Speaker 1: to this show.
Speaker 7: If it is, it's probably the biggest political mistake ever made.
Speaker 7: No question like because she can go on all these
Speaker 7: you know, friendly podcasts or the Morning Zoo Crew or
Speaker 7: whatever she goes on and take all these like, you know,
Speaker 7: what is your favorite color questions, But even when she's
Speaker 7: asked a tough question, like her actual answer will be
Speaker 7: edited out and they'll throw in a different answer like
Speaker 7: what happened with Israel at CBS Right, CBS, They'll let
Speaker 7: her talk for twenty seconds on a topic and move on.
Speaker 7: Joe Rogan will ask a question and forget about twenty seconds.
Speaker 7: He'll he'll talk about the same topic, same question for
Speaker 7: an hour, and especially if.
Speaker 1: You're not engaging how he wants.
Speaker 7: You, right, he'll just keep focusing on and hammering away.
Speaker 7: I've seen this on his podcast Number Time one question
Speaker 7: twenty five minutes, thirty minutes. Yeah, you're not gonna get
Speaker 7: any fluff there, and he's definitely not going to edit
Speaker 7: what you do if you make a mistake on the
Speaker 7: Joe Rogan quote, A mistake some you see is you know,
Speaker 7: detrimental to your campaign, right, and you go back and
Speaker 7: you're like, hey, can you take that out? You think
Speaker 7: Joe Rogan is going to edit his podcast. Well, but
Speaker 7: let's remember what's detrimental to her time, right right?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah, So it's not like you're not even it's not
Speaker 1: even the the the crazy astrology weird you know, uh
Speaker 1: word salads or anything. It's just there is there is
Speaker 1: a math for you math people out there. There has
Speaker 1: to be an a There has to be a mathematical
Speaker 1: algorithm of time spent talking to Gaffes for this woman.
Speaker 1: That is crazy high.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 7: So Joe Rokan's like, hey, let's talk about Israel and Gaza,
Speaker 7: and you can't give him like a little clip, like
Speaker 7: we're gonna have an in depth conversation on this for
Speaker 7: an hour and you have to talk about it for
Speaker 7: an hour.
Speaker 1: Good. This is why he was asking if it's if
Speaker 1: it's buttoned up. And you know they're also saying Trump,
Speaker 1: you know Trump will be I haven't seen anything firmed
Speaker 1: on either.
Speaker 7: Of them, but you know, yeah, Trump is the opposite.
Speaker 7: Though you'll ask him a question, he'll just keep talking
Speaker 7: about it forever. You're the one you have to be like, okay,
Speaker 7: let's shut up, let's move on. Yeah, I heard Andrew
Speaker 7: Schultz being interviewed yesterday. He was being interviewed by Charlottage,
Speaker 7: the god, who then interviewed Harris but whatever and Andrew Schultz,
Speaker 7: the comedian, and he said, that's what's crazy. He said
Speaker 7: that Trump is really good at clocking what's going on. Right,
Speaker 7: so if he like, if if he says something and
Speaker 7: you laugh, Trump puts it in his brain and he
Speaker 7: circles back to it.
Speaker 1: It's why he wanders. But also if you just let
Speaker 1: him go, he won't shut up. Bill talk and talk
Speaker 1: and talk, especially if he's getting some reaction that he wants.
Speaker 1: So yeah, that's that's why pim On Rogan.
Speaker 7: Sure, absolutely, that's why people don't have the same concerns
Speaker 7: that they did with Biden's age, right, right, because Trump
Speaker 7: is constantly out there. We see him every day for
Speaker 7: hours talking. But poor Kamala had to be forced to
Speaker 7: go talk to men.
Speaker 1: And I say, I guess Brett Barr just got a
Speaker 1: Brett Bar, Brett Barr just got Carl Rove stat us. Now,
Speaker 1: this is this is the other thing that's so wild.
Speaker 1: Carl Rove stumping for Kamala yesterday in Pennsylvania. You see
Speaker 1: the words under the picture and you're just like, is
Speaker 1: that correct? Like, I just it doesn't feel correct. All right,
Speaker 1: six fifty KCO Day Radio program, Closer to Home. What
Speaker 1: do we got, Well, we got Mark Robinson. Would he
Speaker 1: have press conference yesterday? And if you remember what he
Speaker 1: was told is if you think the CNN story is
Speaker 1: a bunch of lies, then you need to push back.
Speaker 1: I said it as well. And uh. And then he
Speaker 1: goes and he hires a law firm and they're like, wow,
Speaker 1: you just hired some lawyers if he needs to file
Speaker 1: a suit. So he filed a suit, held a press
Speaker 1: conference yesterday. We'll play you some audio from that. But
Speaker 1: you are going to be shocked to learn that for
Speaker 1: the third time already this morning. Not a story. The
Speaker 1: goalposts have moved again. That's come up next here on
Speaker 1: the CaCO Day Radio program. A couple things here. Congrats Ross,
Speaker 1: you guys are in the top ten there I saw, No,
Speaker 1: you don't want to get too deep into it. The
Speaker 1: Vikings were at number two. That terrifies me. What's crazy
Speaker 1: is in the NFC North all four teams are in
Speaker 1: the top ten. So I don't like that one bit.
Speaker 1: Now let's get down to it other end of the list, Roz,
Speaker 1: who do you think is the worst team in the
Speaker 1: NFL according to the Power rankings they do every week.
Speaker 1: Worst teams Carolina. Some people think that, but it's.
Speaker 7: Non probably.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: It would be the Pats or the Jags. It is
Speaker 1: the Jags. No, no, no, The Pats are all the
Speaker 1: way up to thirty first, so yeah, yeah, yeah, and
Speaker 1: then the Panthers at thirtieth. So for any Panthers fans
Speaker 1: out there, just like you know, and and maybe you
Speaker 1: saw something in this week's game they put some more
Speaker 1: points on the board. I don't know, but the Patriots
Speaker 1: are worse than you. I can read a story and
Speaker 1: say to myself, y'all, I think you have a problem.
Speaker 1: Case in point. I started laughing out loud when I
Speaker 1: saw this. So in London yesterday they unveiled the new
Speaker 1: super future subway cars over there with the London Underground,
Speaker 1: the Tube, and specifically they took it from let's see here,
Speaker 1: well no, no, it ran to Piccadilly, all right, it's
Speaker 1: ever been to London obviously, it's a tourist area over there,
Speaker 1: super busy, super busy, and started its journey not far.
Speaker 1: I don't know. What the name of the stop is,
Speaker 1: but within about five miles. So anyway, so they have
Speaker 1: this new subway card. It's got a different paint job.
Speaker 1: They got dignitaries on the thing, right because it's the
Speaker 1: first time it's ever ran, and this is a news event.
Speaker 1: And the thing pulls into the Piccadilly station and in
Speaker 1: the time that it took it to go from East
Speaker 1: London to the main transit hub there to the Piccadilly stop,
Speaker 1: which is not far, like you know, it's like four
Speaker 1: stops or something, somebody had gang tatted it with graffiti.
Speaker 1: That thing lasted five minutes. It was like hitchbot in
Speaker 1: Philly and it has like the Vice mayor. They could
Speaker 1: backup Mayor's on the thing and some other feather's like
Speaker 1: people from Parliament on there, and they still tagged it
Speaker 1: with graffiti. On your very first trip.
Speaker 7: I'm telling you, taggers like fascinate me.
Speaker 1: Look at you how many times you looked at a
Speaker 1: tag and went, how do yeah? Yeah?
Speaker 7: How or like on the side of a bridge or
Speaker 7: something yeah, something like an overpass, like how does that
Speaker 7: even happen? Or like you recently made the trip to
Speaker 7: Tennessee and drove back and on the way there. You know,
Speaker 7: a lot of train we stopped for trains there in Greenbrier,
Speaker 7: they're a big crossing and that all the Amazon uh
Speaker 7: you know, cars go buying stuff and so you know,
Speaker 7: whole sides of these cars just giant murals, Like how
Speaker 7: does that even happen? You got to go to the
Speaker 7: train yard at night block like an ninju with your
Speaker 7: spray cape pink cans and no, there's a lot of
Speaker 7: places trains stop.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: I used to live I used to live in Raleigh.
Speaker 1: I used to live near one of the train tracks
Speaker 1: in an apartment, and I knew that there were trains
Speaker 1: that were going that. Uh, I don't I don't know
Speaker 1: exactly what they were doing. I knew that there was
Speaker 1: a train that stopped, blocked the crossing nearest me, and
Speaker 1: then backed up onto another.
Speaker 7: Right. But my point stands where you have to plan
Speaker 7: that that there's like planning that right because you know
Speaker 7: you have all the information. You're like in show up
Speaker 7: at this time and I can paint my mural on
Speaker 7: the side of this thing or a lot of these
Speaker 7: tags are complicated, like it's not like you're just like
Speaker 7: writing sloppily on it.
Speaker 1: Like m h, I don't disagree with you. I don't know, man,
Speaker 1: but they got this thing in five minutes. Yeah, got
Speaker 1: this thing in five minutes. Able to go ahead and
Speaker 1: get the get the spray cans.
Speaker 7: And like when you you you ever watched like a
Speaker 7: documentary you're doing research on like Banksy, you know what
Speaker 7: I mean? Like you have these like oh yeah, very complicated, creative,
Speaker 7: artistic pieces of graffiti. Really it's just like nobody knows
Speaker 7: who this person is, Like nobody has seen it. They
Speaker 7: just pop up. How does this happen? Or the whole
Speaker 7: side of buildings like it.
Speaker 1: They just found a new Banksy I know, did you
Speaker 1: see this? And now he puts like uh he puts
Speaker 1: like a plastic thing over it too. Yeah yeah, because
Speaker 1: like somebody or somebody does somebody destroyed one of his
Speaker 1: previous one.
Speaker 7: Does he put up the frame and in the covering
Speaker 7: or is it people that does it? Because I was
Speaker 7: reading both like there's some people.
Speaker 1: My understanding that he put the one that the little
Speaker 1: one that they found on the side of the building
Speaker 1: that had I was my understanding that they thought he did.
Speaker 1: Are you saying that they think somebody else? Well, point
Speaker 1: being somebody did vandalize, and I don't mean the city
Speaker 1: spray washing over it. I mean somebody you saw that
Speaker 1: a tag or tagged a banksy, right, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: I think that is that's a penalty in the.
Speaker 7: Tagging I would think. So, yeah, in the tagging community,
Speaker 7: that can't be a good thing. They asked to be
Speaker 7: frowned upon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I understand that gangs will tag other
Speaker 1: gangs stuff right as a show of disrespect, but there's
Speaker 1: at least a methodology there. Oh right, So uh yeah,
Speaker 1: good job with your new subway cars. And I'm sure
Speaker 1: you overpaid for and will underperform and and will end
Speaker 1: up cost in you four times what you actually budgeted,
Speaker 1: because hey, that's how government works. Man. All right, are
Speaker 1: you guys following the Magic bullet conspiracy? No, not that one,
Speaker 1: not that one, this one. If you're not, let me
Speaker 1: help you out. The New York Times publish an article
Speaker 1: talking about and I know you could be shocked to
Speaker 1: learn this, talking about what they say are Israeli atrocities
Speaker 1: going on over in Gaza, and as evidence they included
Speaker 1: X rays or what they purport to be X rays,
Speaker 1: showing children shot in the head. Or neck with five
Speaker 1: five five sixes quote the same type that are used
Speaker 1: by the Israeli military forces. Five five sixes say, rather
Speaker 1: popular round. In fact, probably a lot of people that
Speaker 1: have one that are listening to this. That being said
Speaker 1: that that's essentially their premise here in the New York Times.
Speaker 1: Look at this, here's X rays. You can tell by
Speaker 1: the by the picture there that those are five five
Speaker 1: six is lodged into the into one case the brain
Speaker 1: and another case the neck of children. Here's the problem, Ross,
Speaker 1: You don't shoot. So let me ask you. Do you
Speaker 1: see what the problem is and why people may think
Speaker 1: this evidence is.
Speaker 7: I immediately saw it?
Speaker 1: Yes, not true? Okay, well go ahead. Then why do
Speaker 1: you think this evidence as somebody who's not even a
Speaker 1: shooter looks sus.
Speaker 7: I mean, and like I said, I could be way
Speaker 7: off base here, But like I looked at the the
Speaker 7: X rays, like the bully is like fully intact, intact.
Speaker 7: It looks like you, yeah, the.
Speaker 1: Tip hasn't eaten. Now, it's different rounds from different materials
Speaker 1: do different things. And is it possible that a round
Speaker 1: that was shot from a five to five six that
Speaker 1: ended up directly into the neck of a child didn't.
Speaker 1: It didn't move, It didn't do anything to the round. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but then I'm starting to it's it's barely possible. But also,
Speaker 1: why didn't it pass through that?
Speaker 7: Yeah, exactly like the entrance wound and an exit would
Speaker 7: It's just like they're sitting there in the head like
Speaker 7: a full pristine bullet.
Speaker 1: Well, and the one in the head is one you know,
Speaker 1: maybe it bounce around it, but then the neck. But again,
Speaker 1: the round is not mushroomed, not mouthful. It hasn't done
Speaker 1: anything anything. It looks like a round looks if you're
Speaker 1: a reloader before you go ahead and assemble, you know,
Speaker 1: the round. It looks perfect. And in each instance it
Speaker 1: looks absolutely perfect. So the question becomes is are these
Speaker 1: not true? And it would be a very simple photoshop
Speaker 1: or and then who provided the New York Times mocked
Speaker 1: these up? Probably not. They probably got them from some
Speaker 1: organization that purports to just be an aid organization that's
Speaker 1: actually a military arm of Hamas who put these out.
Speaker 1: That's because they're just bad enough. They're just bad enough. Now,
Speaker 1: don't take my word for it. They decided they were
Speaker 1: going to go ahead and bring in some some medical
Speaker 1: experts not The New York Times, but people who are
Speaker 1: pushing back on this article, going well, wait a second,
Speaker 1: is what is going on now? Also remember that this
Speaker 1: the article was attached to a guest essay, and in
Speaker 1: fact The New York Times actually issued a statement and
Speaker 1: in response to criticism of the guest essay, which again
Speaker 1: shows these pictures that immediately stand out. Time's opinion rigorously
Speaker 1: edited this guest essay before publication, verifying the accounts and
Speaker 1: imagery through supporting photographic and video evidence and file metadata.
Speaker 1: We also vetted the doctors and nurses credentials, including that
Speaker 1: they had traveled to and worked in Gaza as claimed.
Speaker 1: When questions arose about the veracity of images, including this essay,
Speaker 1: we did additional work to review our findings. We stand
Speaker 1: behind it. Go look at it. We'll tweek this out
Speaker 1: a casey on the rate of go look at it.
Speaker 1: I've never seen perfectly pursuing. But here's why I ask
Speaker 1: for you military guys. You see a lot of five
Speaker 1: to five sixes that struck humans or struck flesh, or
Speaker 1: saw targets that didn't mouthform in some way. I'm curious
Speaker 1: what the idf uses as for the projectile type. But
Speaker 1: there's all different stuff, right, there's softcore, there's uh, you
Speaker 1: get some real tactical stuff. You can get some yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: people are sitting here. I I've just never seen it.
Speaker 1: But I've city bullets that have struck animals, and I've
Speaker 1: never seen one that didn't have a little, uh, a
Speaker 1: little twist, a little tweak, a little flattening to it.
Speaker 1: But you can just never.
Speaker 7: You can understand why somebody would doubt what The New
Speaker 7: York Times says. How many instances do we have of
Speaker 7: like people in the media reporting on firearms or ammunition
Speaker 7: being completely off base and wrong.
Speaker 1: Don't have a clue or don't they don't have it,
Speaker 1: they don't have us, they don't have an inkland. It's
Speaker 1: the thing that surprises me the most because it's like
Speaker 1: you had just one dude who was willing to lie
Speaker 1: but had a basic functioning understanding of firearms, then like
Speaker 1: it would be a lot harder to criticize.
Speaker 7: Right, you have these people that are like, you know,
Speaker 7: I shot in the air fifteen. It was the worst
Speaker 7: experience of my life.
Speaker 1: Remember that guy, Yeah, remember he was crying, he was like,
Speaker 1: he was like that made me emotional. He doesn't know anything.
Speaker 1: And you have more members of the military. You have
Speaker 1: a former who's there's the guy from Colorado's Democrat and
Speaker 1: he's former army ranger or seal or something. I mean,
Speaker 1: that guy could I'm assuming, speak expertly on what happens
Speaker 1: when around, especially around the travels at that speed, hits
Speaker 1: the soft, hits a child's neck. I can't. You're not
Speaker 1: finding the bullet unless it I mean perfectly hits something
Speaker 1: and then bounce to something out. The whole thing is
Speaker 1: completely suspect. Man, but they double a super secreted check.
Speaker 1: So don't be a bigot. Just believe him. All right,
Speaker 1: let's so okay, good, good, good Ryan, what's up?
Speaker 5: Okay?
Speaker 13: So I am a military but I recently, just out
Speaker 13: of last year, said I was going to go and
Speaker 13: hunt a deer with my five five six, all right.
Speaker 14: I shot this deer ten times with the five five
Speaker 14: six while he was running. They finally knocked him down,
Speaker 14: but all the rounds went through him. And that's why
Speaker 14: I wasn't a deadly round to go hunting with. I
Speaker 14: hate to say that for all these hunters, but regardless.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't I wouldn't go with a five.
Speaker 13: I just wanted to try it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I hear you.
Speaker 13: A deer's skin and his musculature, I don't know what
Speaker 13: his density.
Speaker 14: Is far more than a child, do you.
Speaker 13: Know what I mean?
Speaker 14: So for anybody that I forward to lodge in the
Speaker 14: neck of a child or the brain, I don't, I
Speaker 14: don't see it.
Speaker 1: Well, and here's the thing I will, I will leave
Speaker 1: the possibility that I'm wrong. But in each instance, the
Speaker 1: rounds are completely unadulterated. They're just sitting there. They're brand new.
Speaker 1: But just you got a pair of plyers and pulled
Speaker 1: them out of the brass. So yeah, and two two three.
Speaker 1: I don't even know what the velocity is on that,
Speaker 1: but I I did drop charts next to nothing for
Speaker 1: the first few hundred rs, So that'll give you some sense.
Speaker 14: Well, I mean, only possibility of that happening to that
Speaker 14: child would be that he shot from a long way.
Speaker 13: Then it just happened, and you know it's for it
Speaker 13: to hit right there?
Speaker 1: Come on, Yeah, yeah, the whole thing is quite Thanks
Speaker 1: for the call there, Ryan is questionable. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: the kids aren't getting killed. I'm not saying that at all.
Speaker 1: But remember this was a guest essay, and it is
Speaker 1: the person who's doing this essay there. They want you
Speaker 1: to know, or they want to convince you that they've
Speaker 1: done the research and the bullets that killed these children
Speaker 1: came from the Israelis. That's the argument they're making here.
Speaker 1: And and the way that they're doing is they're saying, look,
Speaker 1: those are five five six. That's not what we use.
Speaker 1: That's not what they use in Gaza, which is probably
Speaker 1: not true either. If they use even a small mind
Speaker 1: of a variety of weapons, somebody's slinging to two, it's
Speaker 1: it's not possible. It's just too common. They're not all
Speaker 1: using the same singular thing. I've seen videos of them
Speaker 1: over there. A lot of them are carrying whatever the
Speaker 1: hell they want, So NOE not buying it. Sorry, the
Speaker 1: whole thing sounds like BS. All right, real quick, Jake,
Speaker 1: what's up?
Speaker 15: Hey?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 16: On the terrain tagging, I've been to many train yards
Speaker 16: and they tell that a lot of the taggers that
Speaker 16: you know, we're not going to proxecute, you just don't
Speaker 16: cover up our numbers, you know, And knowing people that
Speaker 16: you know they prosecute, cover up the numbers, and that's
Speaker 16: usually the gang tattoos because sort of gang tag, but
Speaker 16: a lot of the murals they don't get painted over.
Speaker 16: I mean it also helps keep people from painting if
Speaker 16: they do a really good mural.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, I've told I think I mentioned on
Speaker 1: the show that I have some friends who work for
Speaker 1: Burlington Northern. One is an engineer conductor for them, and
Speaker 1: it was very interesting learning more about this. But that's
Speaker 1: kind of what he said. He said that they don't
Speaker 1: really care. They just really don't want people around the trains,
Speaker 1: so they're not gonna bother to paint it over because
Speaker 1: now it exists there. So yeah, absolutely, all right, Jake,
Speaker 1: appreciate it.
Speaker 5: Good morning.
Speaker 1: Yeah you too, man working out, Yeah, I mean, I
Speaker 1: mean it's as long as it's somewhat you know, not
Speaker 1: a gang thing and uh, you know, not you know,
Speaker 1: calling my mother names, they're probably gonna leave it there.
Speaker 1: All right. Hey, CBS selectively editing. No, not that thing, No,
Speaker 1: not sixty minutes. No, this would be something again just
Speaker 1: the other day, and we'll get into yes, yet another
Speaker 1: this one for Mike Johnson and the Mark Robinson presser.
Speaker 1: I know we got a little distracted pleasure your calls.
Speaker 1: I want you to look at those bullets in that
Speaker 1: one story, and we'll get into all that coming up
Speaker 1: here on the CaCO Day radio program Hang On. As
Speaker 1: did New York Times also report a five five six
Speaker 1: can cause a head to explode. That was USA Today
Speaker 1: and Washington Post. According to some receipts I see here.
Speaker 1: The New York Times said it would cut you in
Speaker 1: half like a pen and teller magic trick, or in
Speaker 1: the case of kids, not malform the round in any
Speaker 1: way shape or form, coming to rest in soft tissue.
Speaker 1: So something to think about. Don't be fake news, sir.
Speaker 1: All right, Jen, good morning to you. What's up?
Speaker 11: Good morning?
Speaker 17: I just wanted to let you know that photo is
Speaker 17: utter garbage?
Speaker 5: O Jen?
Speaker 1: Why do you know that? How do you know that? What? What?
Speaker 1: What qualifies you to know that?
Speaker 17: Because I am.
Speaker 18: An Army I'm sorry, former Army medical officer.
Speaker 1: Well, so you've seen you've been around human bodies that
Speaker 1: have received a wound from a five to five six. Yes,
Speaker 1: what would you say is the dead giveaway here?
Speaker 18: The fact that it is whole and complete, right, it
Speaker 18: has zero exit well, well not necessarily a zero exit one,
Speaker 18: because it just might depend on the sense to which
Speaker 18: it was.
Speaker 1: Fired and admitted around around that could that would stop?
Speaker 11: Yeah, you can have a round inside, however, and that's going.
Speaker 17: To depend on the velocity, and it's.
Speaker 11: Also going to depend on the distance. However, it is
Speaker 11: not going to look like it just came out of.
Speaker 1: The box, right, Yeah. Yeah, I've never I've never had
Speaker 1: to treat a single soldier for a five five six wound.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, I looked at that thing and I went,
Speaker 1: come on, where's the real photo. There's no way you're
Speaker 1: convincing me this is it?
Speaker 11: Well, you know what you're not. Don't believe you're lying eyes.
Speaker 11: And that's the most garbage. It's not even good propaganda.
Speaker 11: At least if it's good propaganda.
Speaker 17: I can respect it. This is disgustingly bad. It's so
Speaker 17: it's like not even you two barthing disgustingly bad.
Speaker 1: So if you're in if you're in the radiology department,
Speaker 1: right and they're here, they come in with the freshly
Speaker 1: printed X rays and you do that thing that I
Speaker 1: see in all the you know whatever doctors like, you
Speaker 1: throw them up on the board, look at it. You'd walk,
Speaker 1: you turn and walk out of there in about ten seconds.
Speaker 1: I just want to be clear here because you'd be like,
Speaker 1: these are not the X rays.
Speaker 11: First of all, it's on a computer, so we don't even.
Speaker 2: Need filming anymore.
Speaker 1: I'm going for dramatic. I'm going for dramatic.
Speaker 18: Self, yes, yes, yes, but I would lap and say
Speaker 18: that they're joking.
Speaker 10: Yeah, it's a joke.
Speaker 11: It's a honey funny joke.
Speaker 5: Haha.
Speaker 1: But the problem is is it's about such a serious
Speaker 1: situation and it's just and it but it proves once
Speaker 1: again in Jen. Thank you so much for the call.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what I was looking for this morning.
Speaker 1: The New York Times should have a gen. This is
Speaker 1: what's crazy to me. The New York Times should have
Speaker 1: a genre. You know, have just have somebody who has
Speaker 1: any functional knowledge of anything that has to do with firearms,
Speaker 1: firearm wounding. There was one other thing I just remembered.
Speaker 1: Remember remember the other allegation about the AR fifteen or
Speaker 1: similar sized rounds. Remember they explode into a bunch of
Speaker 1: pieces so they can murder you more efficiently. Do you
Speaker 1: remember we were We just had audio and I can't
Speaker 1: remember who said it. I think it was some moonbat politicianally.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no, the bullet fragments immediately, and it blows
Speaker 1: your whole back out. I was gonna make a joke there,
Speaker 1: I won't, but yeah, this thing is uh, that thing
Speaker 1: is disastrous, dude. But if you're one of these people
Speaker 1: who believes everything the Kamala HQ account says, of course
Speaker 1: you believe what the New York Times is saying. Of
Speaker 1: course you're like, yeah, well look at that. There's evidence, man,
Speaker 1: because that's what you get from these cats. Case in
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House interviewed by CBS, who is reeling
Speaker 1: or should be reeling from the sixty minutes change, Kamala's
Speaker 1: Israel answer insanity. So they bring Johnson on and they
Speaker 1: then air the interview. Let's let's go through just some
Speaker 1: of this, shall we.
Speaker 19: So that's a different accounting than this two percent you
Speaker 19: say was distributed.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Right, So what they're talking about is FEMA relief funds
Speaker 1: that have been distributed in I don't think it's just
Speaker 1: North Carolina, but Johnson had just been in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: so some of what he's referencing is specific. The problem is,
Speaker 1: and let me play this clip again.
Speaker 19: So that's a different accounting than this two percent you
Speaker 19: say is distributed.
Speaker 20: Yeah, so they've obligated some funds, but they've only distributed
Speaker 20: two percent. The risk and recovery efforts still going on.
Speaker 20: And then we address the rest of it.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, So and the premise of it is like,
Speaker 1: the premise is about his experience on the ground and
Speaker 1: how it comports with his understanding as a member of Congress.
Speaker 1: It's a very good perspective to check in on. Right,
Speaker 1: you're the one with the purse strings. You're the one
Speaker 1: with oversight over these agencies to the extent that you
Speaker 1: can without getting stonewalled. And uh, now you're in person,
Speaker 1: you're talking to people on the ground, and and I'm
Speaker 1: sorry the theater here. I know this is gonna irritate somebody.
Speaker 1: I'm probably gonna prabe. Somebody's gonna call and get upset.
Speaker 1: I don't care. You just convinced everyone that an armed
Speaker 1: militia was coming to attack FEMA because one Yahoo out there.
Speaker 1: Why don't we talk about that, because look, I had sympathy.
Speaker 1: I had sympathy for it, and and and I recognize
Speaker 1: that there are people from FEMA, and there are people
Speaker 1: from other you know, from the military and from others
Speaker 1: that you know they do want to do a good
Speaker 1: job and are attempting to do it, but their ability
Speaker 1: to do their job and the ability of North Carolina
Speaker 1: Carolinians to recover, is predicated unavailable resources. So in the
Speaker 1: same way that a town can feel that they've been
Speaker 1: underserved by FEMA, even workers in that region can feel
Speaker 1: that they're understaffed. That's a natural feeling. So it's important
Speaker 1: to have honest discussions. The problem is, that's not what
Speaker 1: Johnson said, not all of it. Let me play what
Speaker 1: he actually said, because it turns out CBS car five
Speaker 1: minutes out of this interview. That's fifteen minutes, and the
Speaker 1: parts that they carved out were Johnson talking about his
Speaker 1: first hand experience interacting with North Carolinians. People's homes are
Speaker 1: gone and family members are gone. In some instance, jobs
Speaker 1: gone and vehicles gone, and everything's gone. And that's who
Speaker 1: he's talking to. So that answer he gave, that was
Speaker 1: a snippet of what he actually did.
Speaker 19: So that's a different accounting than this two percent you
Speaker 19: say was distributed.
Speaker 20: Yeah, so they've obligated some funds, but they've only distributed
Speaker 20: two percent. And when I was there on the ground,
Speaker 20: and you should go I mean, bring the cameras and
Speaker 20: talk to the people there.
Speaker 1: They'll tell you.
Speaker 20: Don't take politicians' words for this, or the administrations were
Speaker 20: talk to people there on the ground. They had not
Speaker 20: been provided the resources almost two weeks out from the
Speaker 20: storm that they desperately needed. And when I was there
Speaker 20: thirteen days post, you know, post the storm hitting that state,
Speaker 20: people are still being rescued. They're stuck in the higher
Speaker 20: elevations in the mountains because the roads are down and
Speaker 20: all the rest, so they need every available resource and
Speaker 20: all hands on deck. The rescue and recovery efforts still
Speaker 20: going on, and then we address the rest of it.
Speaker 1: Why would you carve that out? That seems like the
Speaker 1: most important part of the answer, because already established the
Speaker 1: two percent. They're quibbling over accounting methodology. But Johnson's on
Speaker 1: the ground talking to people. Are you gonna go and
Speaker 1: trim that out? Surely they would only do it once though, right.
Speaker 1: Let's let's talk about voting. They asked about voting. Okay,
Speaker 1: I know that it.
Speaker 19: Is against the law for non citizens to vote in
Speaker 19: federal elections.
Speaker 10: That's established.
Speaker 20: Of course it is, of course it is, but of
Speaker 20: course it is. But here's the problem, there's a number
Speaker 20: of states that are not requiring proof of citizenship when
Speaker 20: illegals are non citizens registered to vote. We know that's happening.
Speaker 20: Everybody should want the law to be followed well.
Speaker 1: And and actually, since we're talking about lost, California made
Speaker 1: it illegal to ask for ID illegal. Understand just it
Speaker 1: is head exploding irony right there. But of course that's
Speaker 1: not all that he said. They're either because they trim
Speaker 1: that as well.
Speaker 19: Know that it is against the non citizens to vote
Speaker 19: in federal elections.
Speaker 1: That's established, course of course it is.
Speaker 20: Of course it is, but of course it is.
Speaker 1: But here's the problem.
Speaker 20: There's a number of states that are not requiring proof
Speaker 20: of citizenship when illegals are non citizens registered to vote.
Speaker 1: We know that's happening.
Speaker 20: Look, Glenn Youngkin in Virginia, I was going to say
Speaker 20: he issued an executive order to clean up their voting
Speaker 20: rules heading into the election less than thirty days out.
Speaker 20: A couple of days ago, the Obama I mean, the
Speaker 20: Biden administration, Department of Justice, Biden Harris administration sued the
Speaker 20: governor in the state, the Commonwealth of Virginia to try
Speaker 20: to prevent them from cleaning out their voter rules. See
Speaker 20: that kind of thing creates a lot of doubt and
Speaker 20: concern in the minds of a lot of the American people.
Speaker 1: Why would they do that?
Speaker 20: We want everybody should want the law to be followed.
Speaker 1: And by the way, what the speaker just said is
Speaker 1: when you hear stuff like that, it creates doubt in
Speaker 1: the minds of people. And you know who agrees with
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson CBS. I'm not Again, we're not lawyers. This
Speaker 1: isn't a court of lot Ross by them editing it
Speaker 1: wouldn't that be them a green that that probably is
Speaker 1: not a thing that they want people to hear.
Speaker 7: I would think, so yeah, yeah, you know, if you're
Speaker 7: an elected official any capacity on the right or even taped,
Speaker 7: I would say, if if you're ever offered to go
Speaker 7: on these networks, right, which I wouldn't go on to
Speaker 7: begin with, but if you're going to do it, do
Speaker 7: not do it taped appearance, because this is what they're
Speaker 7: going to do, right. If they're going to do it
Speaker 7: to the President of the United States, they're going to
Speaker 7: do it to anybody.
Speaker 1: I can't understand what anyone would go in on those
Speaker 1: And that's why the audio sounds different in the second
Speaker 1: one because they to demonstrate this, they're relying on their
Speaker 1: own personal recording.
Speaker 7: If you're going to do it, do it live l
Speaker 7: jd Vance Right, Yeah, yeah, I.
Speaker 1: Saw people go oh with the audio doesn't sound the
Speaker 1: same and the other No, it doesn't because they took
Speaker 1: and they took their recording and plopped it in where
Speaker 1: in the middle of the CBS, which is why her
Speaker 1: audio sounds better and his audio sounds the same in
Speaker 1: the shortcuts but not the longest.
Speaker 7: And when you see the video, you can see where
Speaker 7: they cut the video. We're at the angle changes in
Speaker 7: the video.
Speaker 1: So what's up with that? Anyway, let's get raised stagic.
Speaker 1: But I know what's up with the frozen tundra? Here
Speaker 1: yea snow of the mountains? Yeah, North Carolina, Like within
Speaker 1: five minutes just today, it's people posting I'm cold in
Speaker 1: all the memes. So nobody's ever happy now. So you're
Speaker 1: doing a good job. Keep it up, but I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: A well below normal temperatures pies yesterday low and mid
Speaker 1: sixties advertised about the low seventies, and the average lows
Speaker 1: are well BELOWWD normal too, so expect a little bit
Speaker 1: of change in the coming days, but probably take a
Speaker 1: few mornings to get there. Frost advisors are up.
Speaker 21: For tomorrow morning, covering the western half of the Triangle,
Speaker 21: back into the Triad and into the mountains. It's a
Speaker 21: freeze warning, so to stay chili as most of us
Speaker 21: this morning start off with see upper thirties, low forties,
Speaker 21: a little bit milder toward the triangle, but the day
Speaker 21: most of us sunny, might be a sprinkle of rain
Speaker 21: early the clouds go away for not in the sun.
Speaker 21: You will be upper fifties, near sixty. Tonight in the
Speaker 21: upper thirties to low forties, and again some spots of
Speaker 21: frost around, and then Thursday we get.
Speaker 1: Close to sixty.
Speaker 21: Friday, everybody's in the mid and upper sixties, and the
Speaker 21: weekend looks great, probably less memes and less complaining, lots
Speaker 21: of sunshine and upper sixties to low seventies, lows in
Speaker 21: the forties, and it could get even milder early next week.
Speaker 21: The see so the message chili here. Next few days
Speaker 21: getting milder. Champions will finally go back above normal for
Speaker 21: the weekend, especially early next week, and really no real
Speaker 21: rain in sight. The disturbance in the central Atlantic, small.
Speaker 1: Chance of developing.
Speaker 21: It's about fifty to fifty and seven days, a small
Speaker 21: chance of reaching the southeastern US. Looks like it's either
Speaker 21: going to go south, anticipate, or get turned out to sea,
Speaker 21: So keep an eye on that, probably as it gets
Speaker 21: closer next week.
Speaker 1: The other reason there's going to be less complaining everyone
Speaker 1: is because the boys are on a bye So yes,
Speaker 1: this and that is good too. Yep. Yeah, by the way,
Speaker 1: did you know that forty seven nine? Was that? That
Speaker 1: was the first time that's ever been in an NFL score.
Speaker 1: I was kind of amazed when I did see that.
Speaker 1: I did. Yeah, so you guys set a record there,
Speaker 1: so all kinds of records. Yeah, sorry, dude, Hey.
Speaker 21: Listen, I'm piling on myself.
Speaker 1: It's okay. Yeah, everybody you saw everyone signed a receiver
Speaker 1: yesterday except us, you and me.
Speaker 21: Well, yeah, we don't do things like that during the season.
Speaker 21: We don't fire coaches, we don't listen. It's it's it's
Speaker 21: sad to say, but Jerry's gonna ride off into the
Speaker 21: sunset because of his age. And you know, we'll see
Speaker 21: how Stephen does when he takes over. But right now,
Speaker 21: just it's a it's a it's a sad state of affairs.
Speaker 1: The slog man, all right, we got a roll, thank
Speaker 1: you appreciate it, all right? Seven forty and even Ross
Speaker 1: is greedy bills Amari Cooper. So that's uh, They're set
Speaker 1: to thrive. Vikings not so much. But some would argue,
Speaker 1: why would they? Huh? All right? Seven forty nine, hang on,
Speaker 1: did I need the whole segment to play? All of
Speaker 1: the cuts? And again, I don't know that anyone had
Speaker 1: their mind changed. I will say that Robinson is doing
Speaker 1: the things that Ral and the Democrat Account and others like, well,
Speaker 1: if he feels that he was lied about, why hasn't
Speaker 1: he filed a defamation lawsuit? At first it was why
Speaker 1: doesn't he have somebody looking into it? Then he did that,
Speaker 1: and now they've announced they're filing the lawsuit. And the
Speaker 1: premise is, according to the way that I've seen the
Speaker 1: media reacting as doesn't matter, he's he's still lying. But
Speaker 1: the articles which took five hundred words to explain the
Speaker 1: methodology of how they tried to make this connection, because
Speaker 1: this is like missing link stuff, you understand that, right,
Speaker 1: there's no definite, finite evidence that one hundred per you know,
Speaker 1: I guess a confession would be the would be the
Speaker 1: would be the best. But there's no slam dunk piece
Speaker 1: of evidence. There's a lot of stuff that raises a
Speaker 1: lot of questions in the way that it's presented. But
Speaker 1: then even then you got to figure out how, you know,
Speaker 1: if that's being manipulated, kind of like the New York
Speaker 1: Times with these photos that I'm sorry, they're just not convincing.
Speaker 1: So but one of the questions was why does we'll
Speaker 1: get it. We'll get into it here in the next hour.
Speaker 1: By the way, I was just asking Ross. So yesterday
Speaker 1: we had a story about country artist Grantley Gilbert who
Speaker 1: was doing a concert in Mississippi over the weekend, and
Speaker 1: he said, I have an emergency and he left stage,
Speaker 1: and the emergency was his wife was in the tour
Speaker 1: bus given birth. They had a midwife and all that,
Speaker 1: so they'd kind of planned for this. But yeah, and
Speaker 1: somebody sent me an email that said, I said, did
Speaker 1: I insult Brantley Gilbert in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 7: I thought it was incredibly complimentary.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm like, that's cool. Man.
Speaker 7: If listen, there's tons of times where we do like
Speaker 7: a topic or something is said and I'm like, oh,
Speaker 7: we're going to get a caller. Yeah, email now when
Speaker 7: there's a possi ability of that, you know, But never
Speaker 7: crossed my mind.
Speaker 1: Because I got and I gotta be honest, I was
Speaker 1: going to go in a different direction. But I thought
Speaker 1: it was funny. But I also thought but the thinking
Speaker 1: it was cool was was better to me? What I
Speaker 1: was the first throat that crossed my mind. I try
Speaker 1: to I try to do better sometimes is has his
Speaker 1: wife ever come up and sung songs for him? Why
Speaker 1: does he have to go do her job? Phone number
Speaker 1: eight eight eight nine three four seven eight seven four. Oh,
Speaker 1: look at that trend. De Ragua is the Venezuelan gang.
Speaker 1: He is now accused of a new heist. All right, Ross,
Speaker 1: what do you think the extremely violent Venezuelan murder gang stole?
Speaker 1: Heisted that the news is now reporting on here thirty
Speaker 1: four hundred dollars in panties thirteen suspected trenda Iragua gang
Speaker 1: members linked to the thirty four hundred dollars panty theft. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's a panty raid. People come on at Willowbrook Mall.
Speaker 1: This is down in Houston, Texas.
Speaker 7: Do you think this is some sort of strange like
Speaker 7: initiation or why would that be?
Speaker 1: Well, why would it be because those things are immediately
Speaker 1: sellable and you can sell them for premium in Latin
Speaker 1: America Victoria labeled brand stuff because it's terraf Oh substantially.
Speaker 7: I had no idea. So that will they be milling
Speaker 7: them back like down to Mexico or whatever.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I honestly I wouldn't be surprised if they do
Speaker 1: from but you can sell them too. Look basically anything
Speaker 1: that you can sell online with label on laundry detergent,
Speaker 1: stuff like that. I mean, it's all free because you
Speaker 1: stole it. Apparently the thirteen of them went into the
Speaker 1: Victoria's secret there and we're just basically like, what are
Speaker 1: you going to do, and then just proceeded to grab
Speaker 1: everything they could. So I don't know, there you go. Also,
Speaker 1: they are running a bunch of brothels, right, that's a problem,
Speaker 1: So I would assume you need underwear. They're not for
Speaker 1: the whole time, but for you know, part of it.
Speaker 1: So I don't know the motivation. But police are you know,
Speaker 1: the surveillance footage they see tattoos and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: So they're the ones making the assessment. All right, well
Speaker 1: there you go. Let me get back to the Mark
Speaker 1: Robinson things. So yesterday Robinson and his attorney, Oh let
Speaker 1: me do this. Wait, what is a hang on caller?
Speaker 1: Robinson and his attorney took to a press conference yesterday
Speaker 1: morning after the show to address the CNN article and
Speaker 1: the article from the Assembly, which was the local err
Speaker 1: of the two. And if you remember, people were like, ah, well,
Speaker 1: you need to get a lawyer, you need to get
Speaker 1: a forensic investigator to go through this, and he did.
Speaker 1: And then he said, if you don't believe it, file
Speaker 1: a defamation lawsuit. And he did. That's what was announced yesterday.
Speaker 1: And yet the word on the nc poll hashtag is well,
Speaker 1: obviously he still guilty because CNN, in fact, there was
Speaker 1: the WRAL. Reporter Laura Leslie was like, are you expecting
Speaker 1: us to believe that National News Outlook took time to
Speaker 1: work with the third party to go ahead and frame you.
Speaker 1: Is that what you want to believe, to which I'd say,
Speaker 1: Laura Leslie, do you pay attention to you and your outlet?
Speaker 1: Because I know you worded it that way, but what
Speaker 1: you're really asking is did leftist reporters take information that
Speaker 1: was fed to them by political political activists, political operatives,
Speaker 1: and or candidates. Right, because there's a lot of people
Speaker 1: think Stein's campaign may have been the one that leak it.
Speaker 1: We don't know, and that they wouldn't run with that information,
Speaker 1: because that's also exactly what you just described. And I
Speaker 1: can tell you they would. And if you're going, well,
Speaker 1: give me one example, I will George Bush National Guard papers.
Speaker 1: Do you want me to keep going? Because I can
Speaker 1: keep going. And just on the Trump stuff, there are
Speaker 1: so many examples of where you and your colleagues including
Speaker 1: seeing it. Remember CNN had a story that was so
Speaker 1: fake they fired three reporters. They fired it, They fireds
Speaker 1: because they thought they had a scoop. I remember the
Speaker 1: meetings about the meetings, like why did you meet with
Speaker 1: the Russian operatives? They had a story that was so
Speaker 1: erroneous and so fake that clearly had been placed there by,
Speaker 1: you know, for political reasons that it cost three CNN
Speaker 1: reporters their jobs. So yes, yes, I can believe that.
Speaker 1: But let's hear from Martin.
Speaker 15: I said at the very beginning, what this amounts to is,
Speaker 15: to quote Clarence Thomas, this is a high tech lench On,
Speaker 15: a candidate who has been targeted from day one by
Speaker 15: folks who disagree with me politically and want to see
Speaker 15: me destroyed. And so we are glad to take these
Speaker 15: first steps to fight back against what we consider to
Speaker 15: be one of the greatest examples of political interference in
Speaker 15: this state's history and quite possibly this Nation's here.
Speaker 1: All right, So and that's you know, he's obviously said
Speaker 1: that before the you know, this is this is target.
Speaker 1: But there's a couple other things that I think are
Speaker 1: really important. Let's talk. Let's from a lawyer's perspective.
Speaker 9: The investigation was led by a former FBI special agent,
Speaker 9: and we had a number of other specialists that were
Speaker 9: highly involved in going down in following the facts, knocking
Speaker 9: on doors, picking up the telephone, and also using the
Speaker 9: full range of technology resources available to us in order
Speaker 9: to fully investigate. The lawsuit that we filed today is
Speaker 9: the first step, the first fruit of that investigation. We
Speaker 9: have worked tirelessly to get to the truth for the
Speaker 9: sake of Lieutenant Governor Robinson, his family, and the voters
Speaker 9: of North Carolina. And then today in Wake County Superior Court,
Speaker 9: we filed a defamation lawsuit again it's the cable news
Speaker 9: network and Lewis Money.
Speaker 1: Okay, Lewis Money is the guy who worked at the
Speaker 1: porn shop, the adult shop. Okay, just so we're clear
Speaker 1: on who everybody is. And I saw Lewis Money quoted
Speaker 1: and he said, well, at no point did he come
Speaker 1: to me after the allegations were out and asked me
Speaker 1: to stop saying it. So I don't I don't understand
Speaker 1: why that's why that would be a response, but whatever,
Speaker 1: And I again, I don't know. But there's a reason
Speaker 1: it's called an October surprise, even if it wasn't quite October,
Speaker 1: and it was. It's because it's going to have the
Speaker 1: most impact, because you know how people's attention spans are.
Speaker 1: But it's also harder to rebut something of a technical
Speaker 1: nature like this because even once you if you lay
Speaker 1: it out, let's say that you find it is one
Speaker 1: grandiose conspiracy, and you can explain how they technologically manipulated
Speaker 1: different things it Most people check out of that in
Speaker 1: about thirty seconds. So it successfully holds that mystique that
Speaker 1: it might be true, they know what they're doing, or
Speaker 1: it's accurate. I don't know, you don't know. Mark knows.
Speaker 1: The CNN reporters know whether they you know, what it
Speaker 1: took to convince them, and only they could assess whether
Speaker 1: bias may have been there. But this is all you
Speaker 1: can do from a timing standpoint.
Speaker 15: You know, when times of trouble come in this politics
Speaker 15: thing we call politics, it separates the strong folks from
Speaker 15: the week. The week will turn and run and the
Speaker 15: strong will stand and fight. And that's what we're doing
Speaker 15: here today. We're standing and fighting regardless of who turned
Speaker 15: and ran away from us, regardless of who doesn't believe us,
Speaker 15: regardless of who does. We know what the truth is
Speaker 15: and we're ready to stand and fight those who are not.
Speaker 1: We're not worried about all right. So was there anything
Speaker 1: groundbreaking in it? No, but and they did talk a
Speaker 1: little about it. It's it kind of bounces around, so
Speaker 1: it's not good for one cut. Where they also pointed
Speaker 1: out to the timeline, like you can't adjudicate this in time.
Speaker 1: The courts don't move fast enough. You might be able
Speaker 1: to get an order, you know, like a restraining order
Speaker 1: or something, but it probably not because it's a news
Speaker 1: outlet and you're a candidate for governor. So it does
Speaker 1: everything it is, but it requires then the heavy lift
Speaker 1: of the media to sit there and go, I don't
Speaker 1: care what you're doing. I'm not even gonna give you
Speaker 1: the benefit of the doubts, sir. We're going to report
Speaker 1: this as though it's basically true, and then we're gonna
Speaker 1: ask questions like you you're telling me that a news
Speaker 1: agency would come, you know, collude with political operatives to
Speaker 1: go ahead and do this. Yes, And then the file
Speaker 1: part of a question, was you know, for a guy
Speaker 1: who was probably going to lose? Well, the bigger question
Speaker 1: is if Mark Robinson was going to lose and he
Speaker 1: wasn't an issue, why would the political operatives be pushing
Speaker 1: this story? And even if you think they didn't feed
Speaker 1: it to CNN, they're definitely pushing it. And why would
Speaker 1: they push it if they aren't worried about the guy?
Speaker 1: You're being You guys are being intellectually dishonest here, and
Speaker 1: you're moving the goalpost. There's no question, all right, what
Speaker 1: is didn't he call yesterday? I just for you guys
Speaker 1: are all clear to mix it up. One of the
Speaker 1: things we do here is, uh, we try not to
Speaker 1: put the same caller on two days in a row.
Speaker 1: So it's nothing personal. Some a lot of shows do
Speaker 1: once a week, So don't call and complain to me
Speaker 1: about that. Yeah, Jamal, how you doing?
Speaker 5: Yes, I'm doing good. That won't me. Yesterday it was
Speaker 5: an undecided vote. I can't imagine who that was.
Speaker 1: Between Raleigh and Durham. And sounds just like you. It
Speaker 1: works in your same profession.
Speaker 5: And or case see that sound Case see that sounds
Speaker 5: so oh my god. I feel so violated by you
Speaker 5: saying that. But Casey, let me say this one name,
Speaker 5: Roy Moore, Senate race in Alabama. Roy More sued the
Speaker 5: people they did it. You know what, CNN has always
Speaker 5: led off the hook, Nicholas Sandmon, same thing, Let off
Speaker 5: the hook. This is how they do. Seeing Inn says,
Speaker 5: we want chance recording on what was brought to us.
Speaker 5: And then it's so called to protect the press and
Speaker 5: to protect the institutions of freedom of the press. They
Speaker 5: cut them loose the set shop that accused Mark Roberson
Speaker 5: of that. They plead chapter seven. They don't have the
Speaker 5: money bankruptcy. They did nothing. The point is for them
Speaker 5: to stop Mark Robinson from dating it office. That's what
Speaker 5: this is all about. It's not about anything that's why
Speaker 5: they weren't so late. That's why they put stuff out
Speaker 5: here so late.
Speaker 13: And the problem.
Speaker 1: The problem is Jamal, and I want to agree with
Speaker 1: you because I think it's really important. Is is it
Speaker 1: to say that you can't think of an example where
Speaker 1: this is done for political reasons turns out to be lies?
Speaker 1: Is so easily dismissable. Harry read's the best example because
Speaker 1: at least Harry Reid admits it, right, Harry, Yeah, he admitted.
Speaker 1: He said, well it works. So if I'm a journalist
Speaker 1: that is forever emblazed into my brain, I would be mad.
Speaker 1: Why do you think this is what people don't understand?
Speaker 1: Why do you think I guys that I sit here
Speaker 1: and I trash talk the former GOP head here right,
Speaker 1: h with not a fan of Wiley? Do you know
Speaker 1: why I've talked about on the radio it's not a
Speaker 1: sea because I feel that Wattley misled me on something
Speaker 1: to get a guest booked on this show. Yep, and
Speaker 1: that you're done with me at that point unless we
Speaker 1: have a talk and we work it out, and it's not.
Speaker 1: But his response was one to blow me off. That's it.
Speaker 1: I'm sitting here and I'm i don't trust you on anything.
Speaker 1: I'm not taking anything from you. And the fact that
Speaker 1: the media can't sit there and go, well, you know,
Speaker 1: Harry Reid did this to us and uh, three of
Speaker 1: our colleagues got fired because you guys fed us bad info.
Speaker 1: Is just lunacy.
Speaker 5: And see, here's my thing with WRIO and seeing in
Speaker 5: they know they can hide behind the we're the press
Speaker 5: for freedom of the press. If you allow us to
Speaker 5: be sued, it will come after the freedom of the
Speaker 5: press and the way the found us and and us
Speaker 5: to protect the powerful, protect the week from the powerful.
Speaker 5: They're not what they have done. They have came out
Speaker 5: the Mark Robinson because this is personal for me. And
Speaker 5: don'tbody been out there. Oh my god, Jamal say him
Speaker 5: and Mark Robinson lovers know Mark Robinson's a friend of mine.
Speaker 5: And here's the thing. They came after Mark Robinson like
Speaker 5: never before.
Speaker 13: And here's the reason.
Speaker 5: Everybody knows. The lieutenant governor in North Carolina really don't
Speaker 5: have any power. That's why the Democrats focused on winning
Speaker 5: the governorship and the lieutenant and the arm Attorney General
Speaker 5: Roy Cooper was what the former attorney general. He had
Speaker 5: a lot of power. He could decide laws to defend
Speaker 5: or now and the North Carolina Assembly had the hire
Speaker 5: lawyers because we had attorney generals who wouldn't.
Speaker 14: Do the job.
Speaker 5: The governor gets to do the same thing. So this
Speaker 5: is why they don't want Mark Robinson's governor. Because I'm
Speaker 5: putting out pornographic material. The Kenny Gardners and first gradest
Speaker 5: guess what, he can actually stop it. And if we
Speaker 5: had the Republican party in the House and Senate that
Speaker 5: actually had a pair of go nat that will actually
Speaker 5: investigate Cooper for his disaster, he's done and it comes
Speaker 5: to Hurricane Ellen, things would have changed. But he didn't
Speaker 5: stop Cooper in twenty twenty when he was doing it
Speaker 5: stuff that people when it came to COVID.
Speaker 1: Now when it comes to you got Cooper because they
Speaker 1: don't need Cooper. And let me tell you, they don't
Speaker 1: need Mark Robinson. And I every day and I appreciated
Speaker 1: Jamal or unidentified voter or whatever your identity is today
Speaker 1: somebody who I tend to listen to explain this to
Speaker 1: me that when you have a veto proof majority, you
Speaker 1: almost don't want a Republican governor. If you're Burger and
Speaker 1: the Speaker man, because you run everything essentially the matter
Speaker 1: with the governor. And yeah, that's kind of stuff I
Speaker 1: tend to listen to when I see stuff like this.
Speaker 1: So I don't know. I was reading a story this
Speaker 1: morning about this this. So there's this dude who they
Speaker 1: did a story on because he thinks he can talk
Speaker 1: to dolphins, which was an he accidentally figured out, and
Speaker 1: he also played he communicates with them via music. He
Speaker 1: really really loves these dolphins like a lot, like almost
Speaker 1: a creepy amount in this story, what.
Speaker 22: My body, my body telling me?
Speaker 23: Every year every year, how long good do we make
Speaker 23: that audio?
Speaker 1: Like twelve years ago?
Speaker 23: Every year there's a story this where I'm like, get
Speaker 23: the dolphin audio or Ross is like, I'll see you
Speaker 23: put it on the button board.
Speaker 1: And then yeah, all right more in a moment, hang on.
Speaker 1: So for almost ten years one back in the day,
Speaker 1: and I don't I don't even remember why we mixed r.
Speaker 1: Kelly and dolphin stuff together. I don't remember what.
Speaker 7: They I don't remember the original, but I remember I
Speaker 7: put that together on the fly during the show and
Speaker 7: it was laughing so hard here I can't wait to
Speaker 7: play it. And somehow we've been able to play it
Speaker 7: for what nearly a decade now, he said at twenty fifteen, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Twenty fifteen, Yeah, February of twenty fifteen. It's like nine
Speaker 1: and a half years. Man, there's really something that comes
Speaker 1: up where it's relevant. Yeah, because like here's a dude
Speaker 1: who's like, I figured out how to talk to dolphins,
Speaker 1: and by the way, this lunatic thinks he can do
Speaker 1: it through whistles, grunts and music. And so now he's
Speaker 1: also letting you know, what would you think would be
Speaker 1: a popular song for dolphins? What do you think that
Speaker 1: they would gravitate towards speed metal?
Speaker 7: Yelling Metallica?
Speaker 1: Well, Metallica, you were wrong, sir, all right, So so
Speaker 1: according to him, now, to be fair, I believe these
Speaker 1: dolphins were off the coast of Puerto Rico, so I'm
Speaker 1: you know, I'm sure dolphins in different places, so it's
Speaker 1: probably reggaetone right, Oh no, it's not. No, apparently they
Speaker 1: have a thing for the eighties and yeah, uh let's
Speaker 1: see here, So songs apparently the dolphins were reacting to
Speaker 1: by this dude who's just way too into dolphins, to
Speaker 1: the point that we did have to get this out
Speaker 1: my mind's telling me.
Speaker 22: No, my body, My body tell me.
Speaker 1: Never gets old. Yeah, because every year there's somebody who's like,
Speaker 1: he's a trainer and now he lives with the dolphin
Speaker 1: in the pool and they cuddle and you're like, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh. The fact right here, man.
Speaker 7: The fact that we have one of Marconi for that
Speaker 7: clip alone shows that the holes them as rigged.
Speaker 1: It is absolutely rigged under this dude just likes to
Speaker 1: play him music. All right, So if you ever want
Speaker 1: to serenade dolphins, no, not under the ce sees. People
Speaker 1: are sending me a suggestions. You think that'd be logical,
Speaker 1: caught up in you his nets, right, okay, no, okay,
Speaker 1: all right. So apparently if you really want to trigger
Speaker 1: a dolphin and have it become your friend, you should
Speaker 1: play it Ordinary World by Duran Durand that's a okay,
Speaker 1: that's a good song. That's fine. I guess from a
Speaker 1: dolphin perspective. I guess it's really good. Tramps Vest by Stereophonics,
Speaker 1: The Maniacs and uh oh wait wait here's the other one,
Speaker 1: Dexi's Midnight Runners. They're big fans. That not the song
Speaker 1: you're thinking of. Karov killed Are and the Pogues bottle
Speaker 1: of smoke. You know, dolphins have decent taste in music.
Speaker 1: It's not the best, but it's not awful. So you know,
Speaker 1: but I think, to this guy, that's like flipping the
Speaker 1: berry white on man, and I don't want to envision that.
Speaker 1: All right, here's what you can envision, though. Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: gonna paint a picture for you. You ready for this,
Speaker 1: all right? Joe Biden talking about he called Trump a
Speaker 1: loser yesterday, which is rich for somebody who just got
Speaker 1: cooed by his own party. But whatever. But you know,
Speaker 1: then he's got to say something nice about Harris to
Speaker 1: cover up for the fact that he's actively working the underminer.
Speaker 1: There's no question in my mind. So let's let's hear
Speaker 1: what he had to say. She beat Trump so badly
Speaker 1: into debate. He's to death to beat her again. That's
Speaker 1: a fact. Wait, he she beat him so bad in
Speaker 1: the debate.
Speaker 23: That what she beat Trump so badly in the debate,
Speaker 23: He's scared to death to beat her again.
Speaker 1: He's scared to beat her again. Okay, one, I you
Speaker 1: know Trump should be scared to quote beat her. I
Speaker 1: feel like even Trump couldn't overcome if he was to
Speaker 1: physically at tell you two, you're implying that he beat
Speaker 1: her before, do you mean physically or in another debate
Speaker 1: even though they've only had the one. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: very confused, Not as confused as you are, sir, but
Speaker 1: still pretty confused right there. All right, check this out.
Speaker 1: By now, you have probably even if you don't know
Speaker 1: the woman's name, you've probably seen the uh the footage
Speaker 1: that looks like the original Doom Did you see where
Speaker 1: they laid over the like the the menu for like
Speaker 1: when you were playing Doom over that video They had
Speaker 1: that up on the Twitter. So you know, it's like
Speaker 1: with your your weapons and your rounds and your health
Speaker 1: and all that. But what they're talking about is a
Speaker 1: body cam video that came out of a a woman
Speaker 1: in a bathrobe, Sidney Wilson busting out of the door.
Speaker 1: It's scary looking video.
Speaker 7: Man, dude also always sat yesterday was the still of
Speaker 7: her with the knife like looking at the camera with
Speaker 7: like the gunpointed at her. And I thought it was like,
Speaker 7: it looks like Goovie or skid or something because she
Speaker 7: just looked crazy. And then later on doing prep I
Speaker 7: saw it, you know, it was related to.
Speaker 1: It was like, oh my god, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's over a very controversial shooting. Somehow can we say
Speaker 1: this and you know and I and let me say
Speaker 1: let me, let me add a larger point to this.
Speaker 1: One of the things that is the that is a
Speaker 1: very hard thing to do is if you have a
Speaker 1: very firm position on something and you and you think
Speaker 1: you've thought it out and you've come to logical conclusions,
Speaker 1: and you can back it up with why you think that.
Speaker 1: Even then you have to be willing. You have to
Speaker 1: be willing to listen to people and perhaps change your mind.
Speaker 1: And if you've listened to this show for any extended
Speaker 1: period of time. One of the things that I initially
Speaker 1: push back on, and I can explain my reasons, is
Speaker 1: this demand that all police officers have body camps, right,
Speaker 1: because what it says to me is it says to
Speaker 1: me that two things. One, you you don't trust any
Speaker 1: of the law enforcement, which I get how people get there,
Speaker 1: I got you. But it's a system that had worked
Speaker 1: for a very long time. And yes, I I am
Speaker 1: one one of those people who watches interactions with police
Speaker 1: and on some of the auditors are just they're intentionally
Speaker 1: being a holes. But there's plenty of situations where I
Speaker 1: see officers who get a head full of esteem, they
Speaker 1: have an ego, buttons get pushed, and they're clearly not
Speaker 1: acting within how I think officers should act and how
Speaker 1: many people think they should act, and how a lot
Speaker 1: of other officers think they should react. Right, And I
Speaker 1: have no problem calling those out, But I was of
Speaker 1: the opinion one for that, and two because we see
Speaker 1: so much creative editing out there that's allowed to, you know,
Speaker 1: basically be the video of record in a debate, and
Speaker 1: then even though there's more stuff, most people only watch
Speaker 1: whatever the first thing is they see, they formulate an opinion.
Speaker 1: And so it seemed to me that that was a
Speaker 1: tool because you know, the release of body cam footage
Speaker 1: by departments varies depending on where you are. There may
Speaker 1: be it may be out there, but it may not
Speaker 1: be allowed to have narrative with it, as some do,
Speaker 1: and so people who are wanting to divide us and
Speaker 1: and do these things can kind of control the narrative
Speaker 1: with it. But I talked to enough law enforcement officers
Speaker 1: and I've seen enough that I readily admit I was
Speaker 1: wrong on that I think the body cams are a
Speaker 1: good thing, and I will tell you why because for you,
Speaker 1: poverty pimps and race hustlers and people who would divide us.
Speaker 1: Not because you feel that you're doing something good, but
Speaker 1: because this is your industry and you have been actively
Speaker 1: dishonest on stuff. The the the body cams being everywhere
Speaker 1: has been an unmitigated disaster for you, and yet you
Speaker 1: still try to do it. It has been an unmitigated disaster,
Speaker 1: even though you're friend ends in the media will tell
Speaker 1: you that's not the case. That's how people see it.
Speaker 1: This thing you wanted so bad has undermined your ability
Speaker 1: to continue to shake down taxpayers and create wholesale narratives and,
Speaker 1: by the way, cause emotional distress to those families of
Speaker 1: even the individual who may have been killed in an
Speaker 1: officer involved shooting because you know, they pulled a gun
Speaker 1: out of their waistband or they tried to stab you
Speaker 1: in the head with a knife, which Sidney Wilson is
Speaker 1: said to have done, not just a police officer, but
Speaker 1: also somebody else. And yes, before we before you say anything,
Speaker 1: an officer specializes in mental health crisis was a dispatch
Speaker 1: to the scene, so you got everything that you asked for,
Speaker 1: And yet it couldn't be more clear in this video.
Speaker 1: In fact, it couldn't be. It's more it's more not
Speaker 1: a nor non understanding why the officer waited so long.
Speaker 1: I have to think that they would have been well
Speaker 1: within their rights long before that long, because the distance
Speaker 1: was being closed down that hallway with a knife raised. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Georgetown University, where Sidney Wilson went to college and was
Speaker 1: a women's basketball player in twenty thirteen, it looks like
Speaker 1: or she was class of twenty thirteen, decided they would
Speaker 1: just go ahead and put out an in memoriam thing.
Speaker 1: Georgetown Women's basketball mourns the tragic loss of Sidney Wilson.
Speaker 1: Now they're not saying how and she did die, so
Speaker 1: guess I kind of get it. But do you put
Speaker 1: something out if other former Georgetown University students die in
Speaker 1: the commission of a crime. That's what I think people
Speaker 1: were weird and out by. But that video is crazy,
Speaker 1: and if you haven't seen it, you should, all right,
Speaker 1: eight forty six or a stagic here to kind of
Speaker 1: keep things, I don't know, the same.
Speaker 21: Ish dry most part, Yeah, A couple of sprinkles rain
Speaker 21: overnight with the front and his and lows will stay
Speaker 21: Let's just say about ten degrees below average for the
Speaker 21: next couple of days, more like mid upper forties closer
Speaker 21: to the Triangle you go west out through the Triad
Speaker 21: and the mountain scenes some thirties around. Going to be
Speaker 21: colder tomorrow morning, so.
Speaker 1: Prep for that.
Speaker 21: There's some frost advisories up freeze warnings into the mountains
Speaker 21: where they did have snow in some spots, no snow
Speaker 21: here yet. Right near sixty today and Sunday. You know,
Speaker 21: it's like, you know, it's like a wishing for it. No,
Speaker 21: I don't know anything we're getting toward the winter, start
Speaker 21: wishing for that kind of stuff.
Speaker 5: Mad.
Speaker 21: Tonight we're in the upper thirties to low forties, mildest
Speaker 21: readings from the Triangle east, and sun's back tomorrow right
Speaker 21: around sixty probably on either side of that. Friday, sunny warmer,
Speaker 21: mid upper sixties the week.
Speaker 1: It looks great.
Speaker 21: Early next week looks even better. Gonna feel real nice,
Speaker 21: closer to seventy or above for the weekend, maybe some
Speaker 21: mid seventies coming in by Monday Tuesday. Normally dry, though
Speaker 21: I mean really haven't seen precipts since Helen came through.
Speaker 21: That's a good thing. But you know, sadly, you've got
Speaker 21: to say too, there are parts of the state where
Speaker 21: I'm going to see where the drought monitor comes out
Speaker 21: on Thursday, if they're actually going to show any levels
Speaker 21: of drought. I mean, you go two weeks plus without
Speaker 21: any precipitation, doesn't matter how much fell before that starts
Speaker 21: getting a little abnormally dry. We'll see, We'll see what
Speaker 21: goes on with that, but really don't see anything maybe
Speaker 21: till the end of the month that could bring any
Speaker 21: appreciable rainfall in here. So expect more of the same
Speaker 21: in terms of precipt temperatures down but going back up,
Speaker 21: especially as we get into the weekend and certainly into
Speaker 21: early next week.
Speaker 1: All Right, thank you, sir, appreciate it, and okay, we'll
Speaker 1: come back chat with Jet Bellinger next. Hang on.
Speaker 24: Well, good morning, Casey. A stock's pulled back yesterday. Futures
Speaker 24: are a little bit higher this morning, at least at
Speaker 24: the moment. They've shown some volatility, but right now the
Speaker 24: Dow futures are up seventeen points. United Airlines posted better
Speaker 24: than expected quarterly results after the Market's closed yesterday, the
Speaker 24: carrier bouncing back from the fair discounts that it and
Speaker 24: other airlines offered during the summer travel season. The continuing
Speaker 24: conflict in the Middle East prompted Delta Airlines to extend
Speaker 24: the pause on flights between New York and Tel Aviv.
Speaker 24: Delta now says those flights will be off the schedule
Speaker 24: at least through the end of March. Mortgage interest rates
Speaker 24: tacked higher last week, and mortgage bankers report total application
Speaker 24: volume plunged seventeen percent. Refi requests were down more than
Speaker 24: twenty six percent. This year's holiday sales probably won't increase
Speaker 24: as much as they did last year, but the National
Speaker 24: Retail Federation predicts they will grow. The organization is expecting
Speaker 24: a year over year sales increase of between two and
Speaker 24: a half and three and a half percent for November
Speaker 24: and December. And Casey the discount grosser, ALDI is looking
Speaker 24: to lower Thanksgiving dinner hosts. The chain is offering what
Speaker 24: it says is the lowest priced Thanksgiving best in five years.
Speaker 24: Aldi says it can provide a full meal for ten
Speaker 24: people for under forty seven dollars.
Speaker 1: Casey, alright, hey, who won?
Speaker 5: Yes?
Speaker 1: Say Trump or your boss? What do you think?
Speaker 24: Hard to say? You know Trump is it is hard
Speaker 24: to pin down in an interview where he wants to go.
Speaker 1: It was interesting for sure. All right, thanks Jeff, Ok,
Speaker 1: have a good down the spot there, like you pick. Wait,
Speaker 1: what is this I'm telling you?
Speaker 5: Man?
Speaker 1: Just apps that people are a we'll love to get
Speaker 1: into the tomorrow. What's to get into that tomorrow? Hey,
Speaker 1: I got a question and I guess a response on
Speaker 1: real quickly. One story here, So I don't know if
Speaker 1: you guys know this. So one of the big billiards
Speaker 1: competition in the women's division as they started to get
Speaker 1: into the finals. So this is the semi finals, but
Speaker 1: included a bracketed match by professional pool players Harriet Haynes
Speaker 1: and Lucy Smith. What is interesting about this is both
Speaker 1: of them are not biological females, but rather identify as women. Therefore,
Speaker 1: as part of the World eight Ball Full Federation Federation policy,
Speaker 1: can play and found themselves in this semi final. But
Speaker 1: I saw somebody who made a comment and I want
Speaker 1: to put this to rest. Basically, I said, bigots are
Speaker 1: talking about this story because you know it serves an agenda.
Speaker 1: But it's so incredibly rare that they have to like,
Speaker 1: you know, they got to dig for this stuff. And
Speaker 1: I'm here to tell you this is not going to
Speaker 1: be a rarity. You haven't thought about this, or at
Speaker 1: the very least you have, but you're not willing to
Speaker 1: admit what is part of this. If you tell me
Speaker 1: that you have twenty competitors, you're getting a round robin whatever.
Speaker 1: You had twenty competitors and two of the predators in
Speaker 1: your event are biological men. Whether it's powerlifting, whether it's billiards,
Speaker 1: whether it is boxing in the Olympics, and I have
Speaker 1: to pick two that I think are going to advance.
Speaker 1: I'm picking those two.