Speaker 1: Welcome back to Liberty Lockdown. This is Clint Russell.
Speaker 2: Today.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be delivering you a guest appearance that
Speaker 1: I did on the Jason Levine Show. He was actually
Speaker 1: the guest that I had on on my most recent episode,
Speaker 1: but he told me to come on because there was
Speaker 1: a panel with doctor Robert Malone as well as Michael Yawn.
Speaker 1: If you're not familiar with these guys, they are very
Speaker 1: very high level folks. I've had doctor Malone on before
Speaker 1: and I thought it was a very interesting conversation. Some
Speaker 1: of it like wades into more Canadian focused politics, but
Speaker 1: that's a very brief portion of it. There's about an
Speaker 1: hour of it that is like very high level, who's
Speaker 1: controlling the world? Super interesting stuff, jab vax lockdowns, the
Speaker 1: whole thing. So I think you guys really enjoyed this one.
Speaker 1: If you want a regular episode of Liberty Lockdown, I'll
Speaker 1: have another one of those for you in a couple
Speaker 1: of days. But in the meantime, hopefully this will give
Speaker 1: you something to listen to and enjoy. So yeah, check
Speaker 1: it out. Owen does always go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com use promo code lockdown. Get you some cozy all right,
Speaker 1: and Joy.
Speaker 3: Thanks for Neil, and hello doctor Malone. Yeah, this is
Speaker 3: quite interesting. I went to Canada last year with Massako
Speaker 3: Ganaha to look at the border issues and other issues
Speaker 3: up there. We went from well, actually we left Panama
Speaker 3: here looking at border and canal issues, and then we
Speaker 3: went to Bahamas to look at border and China issues
Speaker 3: there as well, because China has built a large port
Speaker 3: right off the Florida coast and that is basically our
Speaker 3: fourth border is Bahamas. A lot of people don't realize
Speaker 3: that a lot of Chinese come through the Bahamas and others.
Speaker 3: And then from Bahamas we went up to Canada spent
Speaker 3: more than a month there looking at it from coast
Speaker 3: to coast, from Toronto up to Yellowknife, which you know
Speaker 3: where that is, of course, and then we went over
Speaker 3: to Vancouver and went to that Chinese police station and
Speaker 3: saw many things. And then from there we continued to
Speaker 3: look at these issues in other countries.
Speaker 4: Like Thailand and Taiwan and Japan.
Speaker 3: And I mean Masako and I have gone to thirty
Speaker 3: countries exactly in the last four years looking at this issue,
Speaker 3: all across the United States. I went across the entire
Speaker 3: US southern border, that took months from SpaceX to San Diego.
Speaker 3: Some of that was on the Mexican side, all the
Speaker 3: American side. I've been to every country from Columbia all
Speaker 3: the way through Central America to Yellowknife looking at this issue. Right,
Speaker 3: we're quite knowledgeable about it. We were just out in
Speaker 3: Argentina for two months looking at the same issues. What
Speaker 3: I'm getting to with this is you can't understand what's
Speaker 3: going on without context, right, you know, like the doctors
Speaker 3: who used to do house calls and they could see
Speaker 3: things that the doctors who only see patients in the
Speaker 3: office just don't see. They see patterns that you just
Speaker 3: don't see. I guess every epidemiologist knows doctor snow, you know.
Speaker 3: And removing the pump pandle after he made a big
Speaker 3: map of all the cholera cases in the eighteen fifty
Speaker 3: three and fifty four time frame in London. Right, you
Speaker 3: got to go out and see. You got to physically
Speaker 3: go out and see. And that's what I've done for years,
Speaker 3: and wars and all kinds of other things, and patterns emerge,
Speaker 3: and things emerge that you just can't see by reading
Speaker 3: everybody's work. You have to be the source, right, and
Speaker 3: so that said Canada overrun. I mean, you are clear.
Speaker 3: Let's actually let's go over to Ireland right now. I
Speaker 3: see Ireland's finally getting on the radar after we went
Speaker 3: to Ireland a couple of years ago warning that Ireland
Speaker 3: was undergoing a soft genocide. In other words, it's not
Speaker 3: hard yet. There's murders occurring quite a lot now, but
Speaker 3: it's not like everybody's out with machetes. But Ireland is
Speaker 3: being invaded to the point where it's reaching a breaking point.
Speaker 4: Now. Other countries are already broken, right.
Speaker 3: But the bottom line is the architecture that's doing this
Speaker 3: is clear. United Nations, full stop. United Nations is the
Speaker 3: main architecture. If you go to your Toronto airport, you'll
Speaker 3: see IOM there right. International Organization for Migration. Masako just
Speaker 3: took a flight from here in Panama. I took her
Speaker 3: to the airport, took them on the airport, the Panama
Speaker 3: City airport, and she flew with twenty six Chinese that
Speaker 3: were being deported because we know they take the Turkish air,
Speaker 3: so she flew on Turkish air. She talked with the
Speaker 3: Chinese here in the airport. I'm still in Panama, and
Speaker 3: then she talked with them on the flight over to
Speaker 3: Turkey and then and so IOWM was at was at
Speaker 3: the Panama airport as they always are, and Masako flew
Speaker 3: with the Chinese over to Istanbul to Turkey, and IOWM
Speaker 3: was on that side as well. Right, IOM is the
Speaker 3: architecture for this as you go to Japan, you go
Speaker 3: to Netherlands and you go to Skipple Airport and Terminal
Speaker 3: three by the redundan doors when you come in to
Speaker 3: the left, that's where the IOM ticket desk is. Right
Speaker 3: that who's invading Canada. There are other substructures like Catholic charity,
Speaker 3: more than two hundred that we know of. I think
Speaker 3: it's probably more than a thousand. We just discovered another
Speaker 3: one yesterday.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 4: But the but the Chinese UH have.
Speaker 3: Their own architecture for getting in and getting out of places,
Speaker 3: the Chinese, as you know, and Indians of various sorts.
Speaker 3: Of course, the Sikhs are gonna end up having the
Speaker 3: Kalistani fight in the in Uh in Canada. But the
Speaker 3: Indians in the Chinese are going to be competing for Canada.
Speaker 3: That is my view based on looking at this quite
Speaker 3: a lot. But anyway, I'll stop there. We look at
Speaker 3: this everywhere. Panama is a main invasion route and the
Speaker 3: canal is out my window. So I've been warning people
Speaker 3: about uh about Panama for years.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 4: Trump's staff completely, I warn them.
Speaker 3: I communicate with people very close to Trump every single day,
Speaker 3: including about fifteen minutes ago, right, So I mean they
Speaker 3: I've been warning about this ever since Biden was installed.
Speaker 3: I flew straight to Columbia and then Irew flew straight
Speaker 3: to Panama. And I've spent about a year here out
Speaker 3: of the last four or so years realizing this would
Speaker 3: likely be a zone of action Panama, but not this Panama.
Speaker 3: I think this entire region anyway, I'll go ahead and
Speaker 3: stop at that.
Speaker 2: No worries Michael, and you actually laid out quite the
Speaker 2: plan and it definitely has an evasion all over the place,
Speaker 2: coming from the south for the US, the north as well.
Speaker 2: And you're seeing how these different countries like India and
Speaker 2: China who were involved in this as well. And I'm
Speaker 2: not surprised because Western Canada is very very lots of
Speaker 2: Chinese there as well. And set up Clint Russell is
Speaker 2: a new face on the show. Thank you very much
Speaker 2: Clint for joining us. You have me on your show yesterday.
Speaker 2: It was very very nice to meet you from Lockdown
Speaker 2: Liberty podcast and you've been recognizing this. There's some issues
Speaker 2: as well, and of course you're paying attention to the
Speaker 2: media and what's going on. But welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you for having me.
Speaker 2: Jason.
Speaker 1: Yes, I've had doctor Malone on my show about a
Speaker 1: year ago, and I've had on Chris Martinsen and had
Speaker 1: lengthy conversations with Brett Weinstein after their interactions with Michael
Speaker 1: Yahn and the Darien Gap, and they are actually the
Speaker 1: ones that convinced me I was running for the vice
Speaker 1: presidency under the Libertarian Party, and my conversations with them
Speaker 1: were what convinced me that, you know, my as a libertarian,
Speaker 1: my initial premises open borders, you know, free trade, minimal
Speaker 1: minimal barriers for people to migrate. And it was after
Speaker 1: those conversations that I started to go down the rabbit
Speaker 1: hole and I realized that this was all inorganic, that
Speaker 1: in fact, this was the United Nations that had been
Speaker 1: doing this through in goo, you know, funding networks and nonprofits,
Speaker 1: and it was Michael Yahn's work that started me down
Speaker 1: this path. So it's it's an honor to be on
Speaker 1: with all of you.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much for joining us today. And it
Speaker 2: was an honored to be on your show yesterday as well.
Speaker 2: And I really appreciate you coming to the show for
Speaker 2: the first time because I think this conversation is really important.
Speaker 2: It doesn't really matter what political alignment you have. This
Speaker 2: is about security and ensuring that we have a future
Speaker 2: on all sides of the borders. Here counsel re Lisa
Speaker 2: Robinson's back a good friend of the show. As she
Speaker 2: reached down and she said, hey, I have a couple
Speaker 2: of inputs. She's in Ontario. Doug Ford is one of
Speaker 2: the ones that are kind of doing a lot of
Speaker 2: rhetoric talking about like shutting off the electricity of the US,
Speaker 2: removing alcohol us alcohol from the stores and things like that,
Speaker 2: and plus even around her own counsel there's some rhetoric
Speaker 2: going around. Welcome back to the show, Lisa.
Speaker 6: Oh, thank you very much for having me, Jason, and
Speaker 6: please say hi to people in the check because I
Speaker 6: understand somebody in the check said hi to me because
Speaker 6: I just got a text message on my phone.
Speaker 2: No problem, but I thank you very much. You want
Speaker 2: to kind of let people know what Ontario's response is
Speaker 2: and what do actual Ontarians feel about this? Does doug
Speaker 2: Ford represent you?
Speaker 6: No, doug Ford definitely does not represent me and doesn't
Speaker 6: represent a lot of Ontarians here. You know, I think
Speaker 6: Canada is acting more like a spoiled child in a
Speaker 6: sandbox right now. And I think you were making fights
Speaker 6: that nobody can really take seriously at this time. You know,
Speaker 6: we're pulling the alcohol off of the shelves. Well, you know,
Speaker 6: we've already pay for the alcohol, you know, so we're
Speaker 6: really only hurting the taxpayers bottom line at this point.
Speaker 6: You know, same with like you know, the threatening of
Speaker 6: turning off the electricity to what is it in New York? Minnesota?
Speaker 6: And what was the third one? There was another one
Speaker 6: that served with them. I can't think of everything. Maine, No,
Speaker 6: not Maine.
Speaker 2: Away, Montana, that's over here, Michigan no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: I can't think anyways.
Speaker 6: Anyways, Yeah, regardless of that, it's like, you know, they
Speaker 6: they already have backup plans. It's uh in place, especially
Speaker 6: New York. So I mean we just kind of look foolish.
Speaker 6: I mean, we aren't picking a fight, definitely not going
Speaker 6: to win. You know, we should have just closed our borders,
Speaker 6: you know, done whatever we could to stop the drug trafficking,
Speaker 6: the fentannel coming into Canada and going to the US,
Speaker 6: and stopping you know, the guns, the violence, the human trafficking.
Speaker 6: That's all we had to do, and none of this
Speaker 6: would be happening right now if we just secure our
Speaker 6: own borders. And I don't know why we are not
Speaker 6: securing our borders. We're having a crisis up here in
Speaker 6: Canada with housing with illegal immigrants coming in. You know,
Speaker 6: they make almost eight thousand dollars a month while people
Speaker 6: are struggling to put healthy food on the table for
Speaker 6: their own families, put gas in their car, pay their bills,
Speaker 6: keep a roof over their head. So I mean, it
Speaker 6: only makes sense that, you know, we should be securing
Speaker 6: our border. So that's how many Canadians feel right now.
Speaker 6: I'm sure you feel the same way.
Speaker 2: Well, like I said in my intro, I'm embarrassed because
Speaker 2: our response should have been, yeah, okay, let's work together,
Speaker 2: let's fix up the border. We have the same problems,
Speaker 2: let's go ahead and address it. In fact, what a
Speaker 2: great partnership it would have made if we work together
Speaker 2: on both sides of the border to address drugs, fetanol
Speaker 2: and other issues, especially the root cause of it, like
Speaker 2: from countries like China with the raw materials, and actually
Speaker 2: of trading our country plural it's happening to both of us.
Speaker 2: We would have made a great partnership on that particular issue, now,
Speaker 2: doctor Malone. Fourth generational warfare is something that you talk
Speaker 2: about a lot of. Do you see some of that
Speaker 2: in play here? Like is this a psychological game on Westerners?
Speaker 5: You probably mean fifth gen warfare? Of course, there is
Speaker 5: a significant propaganda angle, and I'm being taught. I appreciate
Speaker 5: what I'm learning here. I wasn't aware of how active
Speaker 5: the United Nations was in promoting this. I knew that
Speaker 5: there were a lot of non governmental organizations that were
Speaker 5: doing this. I knew that this was part of the
Speaker 5: Agenda twenty thirty that there should be open borders. It's
Speaker 5: a fundamental human right to migrate to live wherever you want,
Speaker 5: according to the United Nations. I didn't know that the
Speaker 5: UN was actively involved in promoting this. So that's new
Speaker 5: news to me. In terms of the cyber or the
Speaker 5: psychological warfare aspect of this, I infer that there must
Speaker 5: be quite a bit of propaganda coming at you and
Speaker 5: nudge and other technologies being deployed to try to get
Speaker 5: the Canadian people to accept these policies.
Speaker 2: Is that the case one hundred percent? And it's like
Speaker 2: mass formations like Coast's all over again, because already we're
Speaker 2: booing at sporting events, we're talking about buying Canada only
Speaker 2: where people are running over flags like it's ridiculous, but yeah,
Speaker 2: they're falling forward and they fell forward like overnight.
Speaker 5: Wow, it's very powerful tech.
Speaker 2: Say, yeah, I think what happened was they demonstrated how
Speaker 2: they could do that using our media and fear. Fear
Speaker 2: is definitely one of these and it's working really really good.
Speaker 2: Not in the way that I mean like good for relations,
Speaker 2: but if that's their goal, it's working now.
Speaker 5: Michael fear narrative relating to this migration, in migration, what
Speaker 5: they what's the fear aspect that they're promoting here to
Speaker 5: get people to accept it.
Speaker 2: Over annexing Canada and doing US being like Ukraine and
Speaker 2: the US is like Russia. That's how they're positioning it
Speaker 2: and making us all fearful that there's going to be
Speaker 2: a US annexation of Canada or not necessarily like a
Speaker 2: kinetic war, but definitely an economic war. And that's what
Speaker 2: they're setting up the stage for. And well, I'll do
Speaker 2: is I'll go to Michael to kind of clarify that
Speaker 2: a little bit more and maybe some of the un
Speaker 2: connection to that. Michael, do you want to go ahead
Speaker 2: and comment on that?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, first of all, you have to recognize
Speaker 3: that we're actually in a war and this isn't migration.
Speaker 3: These are weapons, right, These are demographic weapons, just like
Speaker 3: the JAB as a clear weapon.
Speaker 4: It's not a vaccine.
Speaker 3: Everybody I think knows that by now Doctor Malone maybe
Speaker 3: can correct me. But I see no evidence that it
Speaker 3: was even experimental. People say experimental, This experimental, okay, whatever,
Speaker 3: It was clearly a weapon, right, and this weaponized migration
Speaker 3: is I mean, democratic wars of demography are are old.
Speaker 3: This is old time, but it goes back. Maybe that
Speaker 3: wasn't close enough. You can screenshot that and buy it.
Speaker 3: It was written by a socialist and you know the
Speaker 3: people that do it. And so I'm seeing this around
Speaker 3: the world. I'm seeing different aspects of this war. For instance,
Speaker 3: again I mentioned it to you before, but I publicly
Speaker 3: many times successfully predicted the interruption of Nordstream so much
Speaker 3: that I went to Germany twice in advance. The last
Speaker 3: time was fourteen days in advance. I was at the
Speaker 3: BASF plant, that's the big German plant right there on
Speaker 3: in ludwigstaff in Germany, next to the Rhine River.
Speaker 4: Why did I go there?
Speaker 3: I was there fourteen days before Nordstream got interrupted saying
Speaker 3: I think something's gonna happen to Nordstream. Why did I
Speaker 3: go there? I went there because it's very clear that
Speaker 3: our enemies and WEF and other much larger enemies than
Speaker 3: WEF that because WEF is just just a well, it's
Speaker 3: it's a group of people that are in other groups.
Speaker 3: But the bottom line is, as they're clear, I call.
Speaker 5: It a trade union. Trade union of the thousand largest
Speaker 5: companies in the world.
Speaker 4: That's good.
Speaker 3: Like the one that right right out my window here, Blackrock,
Speaker 3: that just bought the port right or ports here right
Speaker 3: in uh and uh and again I published in advance
Speaker 3: on that American companies could buy these uh. Unfortunately it's
Speaker 3: black Rock. But in any case, but you're right, doctor
Speaker 3: and the uh. But we knew, we know that they
Speaker 3: want to de industrialize Europe, right, So if you're going
Speaker 3: to do your carver matrix. If you're a carver, is
Speaker 3: a planning tool that special operations use when you're selecting
Speaker 3: your targets.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: It's called carver criticality, accessibility, recouperability, vulnerability. Anyway, when I
Speaker 3: was in the Army, we learned these things, right, And
Speaker 3: so I did a carver matrix for Europe, and I thought, well,
Speaker 3: if I'm going to take out, if I'm going to
Speaker 3: de industrialize Europe, I'm going to go for Germany. Right,
Speaker 3: I've been all over Europe. I lived in Europe for
Speaker 3: six years. Right, adois checking this right, and I speak
Speaker 3: German fluently, right, So I thought, well, if I'm gonna
Speaker 3: take out Germany, who would that takeout? I would take
Speaker 3: out BASF and Nordstream.
Speaker 4: Right. So I was at BASF fourteen days. I was
Speaker 4: there twice.
Speaker 3: Actually, the last time was fourteen days before Nordstream got
Speaker 3: blown up?
Speaker 4: Right? Was I surprised? No?
Speaker 3: I bought an extra iPad that I just watched the flows.
Speaker 3: How many cubic meters per second we're going I watched
Speaker 3: for many months because I thought, at one point these
Speaker 3: are going to go to zero, and they did. Likewise,
Speaker 3: we successfully predicted Masako Ganaha and I that growning in
Speaker 3: gas field in Netherlands would be cuts the biggest gas
Speaker 3: field in Europe. And many times people were saying when
Speaker 3: I kept publishing, that nobody's gonna cut growing in gas
Speaker 3: field because it's the biggest gas field in Europe. And
Speaker 3: I'm like, exactly, And they cut growning in gas field.
Speaker 3: Not only did they cut it, but they filled it
Speaker 3: in with concrete. That they've destroyed the gas field. It's
Speaker 3: unbelol not the whole gas field, but a huge amount
Speaker 3: of it, the biggest part of it.
Speaker 4: That's a big deal.
Speaker 3: So these things all accrue to the destruction of Europe,
Speaker 3: for instance, the weaponised migration, you know, the death jabs,
Speaker 3: the nord Stream growing, and on and on and on. Sorry,
Speaker 3: I'm watching the same in Japan, watching the same Thailand.
Speaker 3: You don't see it in the news much, but I've
Speaker 3: been to every province in Thailand, right, I've been all
Speaker 3: over that place. You can see me in the news
Speaker 3: with the prime ministers and all that stuff. I'm very
Speaker 3: familiar with Thailand because Thailand is strategically important.
Speaker 4: Not Taiwan, Thailand.
Speaker 3: I go there too, but Thailand is the hyphen and
Speaker 3: Indo Pacific. Right, it's very important, and I see Thailand
Speaker 3: even being under attack. Now I'll save that for some
Speaker 3: later time, but just remember what I said. In the future,
Speaker 3: you're gonna see big problems in Thailand. But this is
Speaker 3: all part of a larger thing.
Speaker 4: That's going on.
Speaker 3: The death jabs that doctor Malone tracks, another farm issues
Speaker 3: that are quite severe, and then there's the weaponized migration.
Speaker 3: There's the energy, there's the agricultural products that I've been
Speaker 3: warning about for years now.
Speaker 4: It's just a matter.
Speaker 3: When you have a war or a pandemic or a famine,
Speaker 3: you always get a lot of hot human cosmotic pressure,
Speaker 3: which is the pushing the pull of migration. Now we've
Speaker 3: got all these routes open right now if Trump as president.
Speaker 3: The Dairy and Gap route is now down to a trickle,
Speaker 3: maybe two percent of what it was at this time
Speaker 3: last year. However, the infrastructure is completely there and all
Speaker 3: like I've got somebody down in Columbia right now with
Speaker 3: looking at this right and I just got back from
Speaker 3: the Dairy and Gap. The infrastructure is still there. United
Speaker 3: Nations is still operating full steam ahead. All the camps
Speaker 3: are open, all the camps are manned, there does continue
Speaker 3: to be a trickle coming through. What I'm saying is,
Speaker 3: and I've told the Trump team this many many times,
Speaker 3: and I'll say it again right now. If you don't
Speaker 3: take out the United Nations, everything else is bullshit. If
Speaker 3: you don't take out the United Nations, all the rest
Speaker 3: it's just Hollywood. You have to take out the United
Speaker 3: Nations and then address the Chinese architecture, because the Chinese
Speaker 3: get into Canada and the United States, and I was
Speaker 3: over in Armenia looking at them do it over there
Speaker 3: in Georgia and all these places. They use their own
Speaker 3: architectures to do these things, and they're quite robust. And
Speaker 3: the Chinese are traveling on fake passports, right they're official
Speaker 3: passports that are authentic, but they're not with their real.
Speaker 4: Name and that sort of thing, and lots of them.
Speaker 3: We know that more than twenty five thousand Chinese, as
Speaker 3: just one example, came through the Darian Gap and just
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, over five hundred thousand people came through
Speaker 3: just the Daarian Gap in twenty twenty three, and of
Speaker 3: that over twenty five thousand.
Speaker 4: We're Chinese. A lot more we're Afghans.
Speaker 3: Iranians, who's who in the zoo over one hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty countries.
Speaker 2: And as doctor Malone mentioned in Psychological Warfare, it works
Speaker 2: well and does Michael's highlight here, there is a global
Speaker 2: war that's going on. So, Clint, when you were watching
Speaker 2: the Lockdown's kick gam and things changed south of the border,
Speaker 2: you saw how people are going after each other, the vaks, unvaxed,
Speaker 2: people were really scared, those that would wear a mask,
Speaker 2: those that would wear a mask, and you saw that
Speaker 2: division happen. They've now wrapped it up. Now it's country
Speaker 2: versus country, border across the border. Now, what are your
Speaker 2: thoughts there?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it's a natural evolution of the divide
Speaker 1: and conquered tactics which are used perennially by governments just
Speaker 1: to keep us from rising up against governments. But this
Speaker 1: seems to take on a more nefarious plotting nature in
Speaker 1: that it seems to be global versus national interests. And
Speaker 1: I think that's from my vantage point as a libertarian,
Speaker 1: even though I'm not like a diehard nationalist, I'm very
Speaker 1: much not a globalist, Like I want to go down
Speaker 1: as small to the local community as possible. When I
Speaker 1: realized that the nation state was actually being eroded to
Speaker 1: the benefit of globalist interests. That's when I really started
Speaker 1: to wake up to what was going on.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Doctor Malone when he was on the Ready Lockdown, you know,
Speaker 1: a year and a half ago, really elucidated this with
Speaker 1: the fifth generation warfare and everything else. So I think
Speaker 1: that's what we're witnessing. And I think that you know,
Speaker 1: the Trump administration, that the treatment of Trump, and then
Speaker 1: you just extrapolate that to any sort of populous right
Speaker 1: winger that that embraces the nation state in contrast to
Speaker 1: the globalist interests. They are treated in the exact same fashion,
Speaker 1: from Brazil to Romania to the US. Obviously, there's so
Speaker 1: many examples, and I don't think it's coincidental. The playbook
Speaker 1: looks almost identical. I would love to get into more
Speaker 1: of the nitty gritty with mister Yan though. When he
Speaker 1: says they are doing this, I want to know who
Speaker 1: they is. Is he talking about China? Who's he talking about?
Speaker 3: Actually I can take it if you want, but I
Speaker 3: don't want to dominate the conversation, you know, So maybe
Speaker 3: Lisa has something to say, or doctor Malone.
Speaker 2: Well, well we'll just we'll circle back to that when
Speaker 2: when we bring you back up. Because it's a great question.
Speaker 2: I'm letting go.
Speaker 5: I want to hear that I have.
Speaker 2: I want to hear it too. Please, there you go.
Speaker 2: We've yielded the are.
Speaker 3: Just call me back when I've gone too long, because
Speaker 3: there's a lot to say. You know, when I took
Speaker 3: Brett Weinstein down to the dairy and gat that man
Speaker 3: loves jungles, by the way, you know he got he
Speaker 3: did his PhD work down here. I took him in
Speaker 3: about fifty or sixty other people. I took a couple
Speaker 3: of congressmen, Epoch times, the whole worst like long, Who's
Speaker 3: who right, uh, doctor Chris Martinson and but but you
Speaker 3: know Brett, you know, he loves the jungle.
Speaker 4: And he asked me who runs this thing?
Speaker 3: So I just asked him, you know, he's a evolutionary
Speaker 3: biologist who.
Speaker 4: Runs the jungle. You know who runs the jungle?
Speaker 3: I don't know. Actually I don't know who exactly they are.
Speaker 3: I know a lot of them. Clearly, Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 3: is one, clearly extra uh uh, the extra large companies,
Speaker 3: let's say, like black Rock, who just took you know,
Speaker 3: the port not very far from me, right now, Uh,
Speaker 3: they took or they took a couple for twenty three
Speaker 3: billion dollars, right, they are, you know, more powerful than
Speaker 3: a lot of countries by far, obviously. And now Blackrock
Speaker 3: is the only it's one of the only companies that's
Speaker 3: allowed to do.
Speaker 4: The asset management in China, interestingly. Right. So in any case,
Speaker 4: and also Larry think.
Speaker 3: Of Blackrock, he's clearly all about letting this invasion continue.
Speaker 3: He's very clear about that. He was clear about it
Speaker 3: within the last about forty eight hours again on video. So,
Speaker 3: I mean, so who's who in the zoo? We've got
Speaker 3: all these different oligarchical structures. You've got Chinese, but keep
Speaker 3: in mind, Chinese aren't monolithical. The Chinese Communist Party also
Speaker 3: has splits. And then there's a lot of Chinese that
Speaker 3: aren't with the Chinese Communist Party at all. Just got
Speaker 3: off the phone with one of those in the last
Speaker 3: hour or so. I mean, there's a lot of dissionens
Speaker 3: out there as well. Then you've got, of course, where
Speaker 3: do we end here.
Speaker 4: You've got just the religions.
Speaker 3: Of course, you've got globalist for instance, I mean, I'm Christian,
Speaker 3: we are clearly globalist.
Speaker 4: You've got globalist.
Speaker 3: Muslims, of course, and and then there's Jewish structures which
Speaker 3: are globalists, and but they're in a different way than
Speaker 3: it want to make everybody Jewish. They want to more
Speaker 3: take the cockpit, whereas Muslims and Christians kind of want
Speaker 3: to make everybody Muslim or Christian.
Speaker 4: Right, So there's different, many different forms.
Speaker 3: If you're an evolutionary biologist like doctor Brett Weinstein, then
Speaker 3: how would you classify these different types of globalists. You know,
Speaker 3: you've got the religious globalists, You've got the you know,
Speaker 3: you've got the financial and the economic You've got the
Speaker 3: economic and military globalists that just want to rule the world. Now, Panama,
Speaker 3: Why do I spend so much time in Panama? There's
Speaker 3: seven vital choke points in the world, and one of
Speaker 3: them is Panama. Another is sus Canal baboh Mandeb of course,
Speaker 3: straight of Hormuz, Malacca, blah blah blah. So anyway, Panama
Speaker 3: in particular is very important to the United States. It's like,
Speaker 3: you know this important, right, you know, it's pretty important.
Speaker 3: But we've also so it's a path between the seas.
Speaker 3: This canal opened in nineteen fourteen, which happened to be
Speaker 3: the same year that Basf and Germany started doing nitrogenous
Speaker 3: fertilizers there that got shut off with the North stream
Speaker 3: getting cut. But anyway, nineteen fourteen this canal opened. But
Speaker 3: also there's a path between the continents here, between North
Speaker 3: and South America which is slowly opening up. I'm the
Speaker 3: one that found those two bridges being built out in
Speaker 3: the jungle, and I first talked about those about over
Speaker 3: a year ago, and a lot of people said, no,
Speaker 3: that's impossible. Even the Panamanian government denied it. And I
Speaker 3: was like, look at the mud on my boots. I
Speaker 3: just drove up six hours to ask you who's building it,
Speaker 3: you know. And so in any case, that was why
Speaker 3: I took Brett Weinstein and Chris Martinsen and Epoch and
Speaker 3: all these other people down to the Laura Lumer took
Speaker 3: them all down to those bridges, and you can see
Speaker 3: that path to Colombia and South America is being opened
Speaker 3: up now.
Speaker 4: China is very clear. They've got a book called Panama.
Speaker 3: It's called China's Belton Road Initiative Panama right, and they've
Speaker 3: got their map right through the Darian right, and so
Speaker 3: the Darien Gap. Of course, that's what will connect that
Speaker 3: does connect, you know, Colombia Panama. Now keep in mind,
Speaker 3: the first town by Westerners in the North American mainlands,
Speaker 3: either North or South America, was not out in the
Speaker 3: Dominican Republic that was on an island, but on the
Speaker 3: mainland of North or South America, was opened in fifteen
Speaker 3: ten by Balboa.
Speaker 4: This is important.
Speaker 3: So Balboa opened this town called Santa Mania La Antigua
Speaker 3: Delda ion of the Darien, right, so Santa Maria basically
Speaker 3: of the Darien. It lasted for fourteen years. The Indians
Speaker 3: knocked them out. But the reason that they built that
Speaker 3: town in the Darien is because of how important Darien is.
Speaker 3: People have been trying to make this path between the seas.
Speaker 3: They tried for four hundred years before the United States
Speaker 3: finally did it, and it wiped some people off the map.
Speaker 3: Spanish got hurt and then the then the Scottish came in,
Speaker 3: and of course the Scottish.
Speaker 4: Came in and they did their Darien scheme.
Speaker 3: Some people call it afterwards, but at the time they
Speaker 3: called it New Caledonia, which is you know, Caledonia's the
Speaker 3: old name for Scotland. But the uh uh, and some
Speaker 3: people called it New Edinburgh. But anyway, they started that
Speaker 3: in sixteen ninety eight and by sixteen ninety nine it
Speaker 3: wasn't doing so well and two thousand dead scotsmen later
Speaker 3: trying to make their passage between the seas and Darien,
Speaker 3: Scotland was burke and so in seventeen oh seven, seventeen
Speaker 3: oh six, seventeen oh seven finalized. In seventeen oh seven
Speaker 3: Scotland was absorbed by the United Kingdom because Darien knocked
Speaker 3: them out. They went bankrupt and they were hurt, and
Speaker 3: that's how Scotland lost their sovereignty even to this day.
Speaker 3: Happened in Darien, and then come some other people all
Speaker 3: got killed, and then come the French to build their canal.
Speaker 4: Right they got they went bankrupt.
Speaker 3: The guy that was the Frenchman that was working on
Speaker 3: the canal for the French was named you know Dala SEPs.
Speaker 4: He's the one that.
Speaker 3: Got credit for Sue canal. They went bankrupt. He almost
Speaker 3: went to prison. And then Americans came in and said
Speaker 3: we can do it, and people are like, no, you can't.
Speaker 3: The Americans, you know how Americans are crazy, And we
Speaker 3: did it. So in nineteen fourteen, we opened the canal,
Speaker 3: right and ever since that time, you know.
Speaker 4: It's been slowly. You know, it was great for a while.
Speaker 3: But bottom line is they say Jimmy Carter gave it away.
Speaker 3: That's like Jimmy Carter is sort of Jimmy Carter was
Speaker 3: just a Trudeau of his day, right, just like Trudeau
Speaker 3: just gave away those islands off the off the west coast,
Speaker 3: which will eventually, you know, back to the indigenous people.
Speaker 4: Right when did he do that? About a month ago?
Speaker 3: So these these sorts of things are nothing new. But
Speaker 3: when when I've got a book here, everybody should read.
Speaker 4: Oh is it it? Yeah? There it is astutely. This
Speaker 4: is a very good book, Path between the Seas.
Speaker 3: If you want to know more about how Panama was formed,
Speaker 3: Panama the country and the Panama Canal, that's it.
Speaker 4: Path between the Seas. It's a great book. I read it.
Speaker 3: It'll take you a little while, but it's very good.
Speaker 3: And if you read that one and you read the
Speaker 3: Creature from jack Lyland together, it doesn't matter which order
Speaker 3: you'll see the Creature from jack Lyland, you know. G
Speaker 3: Edward Griffin. He describes how the globalists took the Panama
Speaker 3: Canal from the United States and gave it to Panama.
Speaker 3: He was a Panama is just a placeholder. Keep in mind,
Speaker 3: the United States formed Panama. We cleaved off a rib
Speaker 3: from Columbia so that we could make Panama. Right, So
Speaker 3: we actually, you know, created Panama from scratch, and then
Speaker 3: we gave it sovereignty, sovereignty, and then we created the canal,
Speaker 3: which was ours full stop. And then over time the
Speaker 3: globalists wanted to take it back. It took a very
Speaker 3: long time. You know, I read a lot of old books,
Speaker 3: a lot. I just spent like six thousand dollars on
Speaker 3: old books. I mean, this is to understand how these
Speaker 3: all these things work. You can't understand it from just
Speaker 3: sitting where you're at. You have to really study history, right,
Speaker 3: and then you can start to see how these things
Speaker 3: are evolving. So the bottom line is it was actually
Speaker 3: globalist that actually built the canal actually, and if you
Speaker 3: want to be really clear about it, and then finally
Speaker 3: they take it away from the United States and give
Speaker 3: it to Panama. And now we're taking it from Panama
Speaker 3: and giving it back to the United States. Right, it's
Speaker 3: a little bit more twisted than it appears. The more
Speaker 3: you know, the more interesting it gets. On the psychological warfare.
Speaker 3: By the way, the main grease of psychological warfare is intoxicans, right,
Speaker 3: whether that the alcohol or whatever dope of any sort,
Speaker 3: it's intoxicants, you know, psychological warfare. If you really want
Speaker 3: to dumb people down. I found this book in Argentina
Speaker 3: a few months ago in an old bookstore from sixteen
Speaker 3: forty eight, right, reprinted in nineteen twenty or something, and
Speaker 3: it talked about how the Spaniards were up in Guatemala
Speaker 3: using intoxicans to rob the indigenous people.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: That was a book from sixteen forty eight. They were
Speaker 3: already doing it and describing it this. You know, the intoxicants,
Speaker 3: these are actual weapons. There are weapons just like just
Speaker 3: like the this the weapons of mass migration. Intoxicans are
Speaker 3: a very serious weapon, just like the JAB. So we're
Speaker 3: getting hit from all these different angles, and you can't
Speaker 3: understand what's happening with the migration, which is really invasion
Speaker 3: unless you understand the rest of this historical context and
Speaker 3: the context of the energy and the food and these
Speaker 3: sorts of things.
Speaker 1: I just want to add real quick that you know,
Speaker 1: Panama Canal was completed in nineteen fourteen. The Phutto Reserve
Speaker 1: Act was passed in nineteen thirteen. If you're going to
Speaker 1: talk about the globalist aspects of the Panama Canal, well,
Speaker 1: the ultimate weapon of control for the financial system was
Speaker 1: the creation of the United States Funeral Reserve. So I
Speaker 1: think that timing is not coincidental in the fact that G.
Speaker 1: Edward Griffin talked about both of those issues. Is also
Speaker 1: it makes perfect sense that he would identify the value
Speaker 1: in both of those I also wanted to talk about
Speaker 1: the well, I don't want to occupying any time, so
Speaker 1: we'll just keep keep ping ponging.
Speaker 2: No for sure. And what I want to start to
Speaker 2: kind of get us into is now that we see
Speaker 2: this globalist and there's multiple arms to this globalist there's
Speaker 2: a big, let's say, octopus. There's many different arms to this,
Speaker 2: whether it's religious, economic, other whether they're going through countries,
Speaker 2: whether they're going through trade. But there's a lot of migration,
Speaker 2: as Michael's pointed out, and intoxication and trying to dumb
Speaker 2: down a country. There's a lot of tentacles to this thing. Now,
Speaker 2: at least I think you're mute on your end, but
Speaker 2: I'm about to bring you up. What is it like
Speaker 2: for you as a Canadian to see this kind of
Speaker 2: relationship deteriorate the way it is and how disrespectful Canadians
Speaker 2: are being about this. This is not like us now.
Speaker 2: I remember during the lockdown phase of things, there were
Speaker 2: Canadians calling for other Canadians to be picked up in
Speaker 2: trucks and and force vaccinated and all this kind of
Speaker 2: stuff that was very un Canadian. And now here we
Speaker 2: are booing the atom of the US, our closest daghbor,
Speaker 2: and getting into a fight where we literally cannot win.
Speaker 2: So what are we doing as Canadians and what's oppression
Speaker 2: of that?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 6: I was completely distraught. I was completely ashamed of Canada
Speaker 6: seeing them dooing our neighbors national anthem during a hockey game.
Speaker 6: I didn't think that Canadians would ever stoop so low.
Speaker 6: And then also to have our Prime minister say basically
Speaker 6: it's okay to do that, and like, you know, hey,
Speaker 6: we're not doing the people, We're just doing like you
Speaker 6: know Trump, but yet you know they're doing it a
Speaker 6: hockey game. I mean that was really really embarrassing. And
Speaker 6: you know what, I was actually very happy when us
Speaker 6: won in that game, because it felt like karma, like
Speaker 6: how dare us sit there and do our neighbors? That
Speaker 6: was unpatriotic as we could possibly get. It was the
Speaker 6: low of the low at that point. And yeah, and
Speaker 6: to your point, you know the way that they were
Speaker 6: treating the unvaccinated here in Canada, you know, on the
Speaker 6: front page of the Star, you know, they were saying
Speaker 6: that if you were unvaccinated and you want to go
Speaker 6: to a hospital, you know, let them die. Don't let
Speaker 6: them go to the hospital. They just let them die.
Speaker 6: I mean, you know, that's the behavior. And that's what's
Speaker 6: been happening to Canada over the last five years. Has
Speaker 6: just been deteriorating. It's like, you know, we're going down
Speaker 6: the slippery slope and the snowball's halfway down the hill
Speaker 6: and we just can't stop it. It's spiraling out of
Speaker 6: control right now. And Canadians just start as nice as
Speaker 6: you know, everyone say that we are, because we're not.
Speaker 4: We're not.
Speaker 2: And another thing at all, for sure, and another thing.
Speaker 5: That's medical assistance in dying. Oh yeah, is that shifted
Speaker 5: it all?
Speaker 2: It got worse. So what happened is we were at
Speaker 2: the NCI and Admonton just a couple of days ago,
Speaker 2: doctor Malone, having this conversation, it's gotten worse thirty percent
Speaker 2: year over year. They're opening it up to new types
Speaker 2: of things, and on the table is staled Medical Assistance
Speaker 2: and Dying for mature miners, which is literally children. So
Speaker 2: we're working on passing that particular Billstale, do you want
Speaker 2: to want to comment on that, doctor Moe, No, I'm just.
Speaker 5: Wondering what the status is. So what you're teaching me
Speaker 5: is that there has not been an awareness that this
Speaker 5: is unethical, but rather the government is continuing to advance
Speaker 5: and expand the program. Is that what I'm hearing?
Speaker 2: Yes, correct, advancing and expanding the program, making it easier.
Speaker 2: That even removed the requirement to wait, so you actually
Speaker 2: can get a day of so if you decide to
Speaker 2: make that decision, you can make it day up now.
Speaker 2: And yes, we've had abuses of the system too. We
Speaker 2: even have things that they're not allowed to do that
Speaker 2: they're breaking the rules up. About twenty three percent is
Speaker 2: what we found in the NCI. About twenty three percent
Speaker 2: of the maid's procedures are actually illegal according to even
Speaker 2: the maids requirements. So people are getting through and having
Speaker 2: that final solution and Canadians are not stopping it at
Speaker 2: this stage.
Speaker 1: To the Canadians on the panel, is this basically just
Speaker 1: like the final culmination of a complete destruction of the
Speaker 1: Canadian spirit that they would then offer up assisted suicide?
Speaker 1: Is this like, does it feel as if this is
Speaker 1: a caring proposal or is this just like part of
Speaker 1: depopulation agenda. I'm just like, what does it feel like.
Speaker 2: To you guys? Well, for me, it feels like it's
Speaker 2: a psychological warfare for us to be depressed and to
Speaker 2: go ahead and encourage a society where you go ahead
Speaker 2: and make those kind of decisions, including for your children
Speaker 2: or by the children. And that's the most scary part
Speaker 2: in parts of Canada, Clint, A child can make this
Speaker 2: decision and the parent has no say, and there is
Speaker 2: some court precedents now where the child, if they're declared
Speaker 2: by the state as a mature minor, the parent has
Speaker 2: lost all rights. So this is the road that Canada
Speaker 2: is going down. It's very scary.
Speaker 1: I mean this in America, we were always you know,
Speaker 1: we thought it couldn't get any worse than allowing miners
Speaker 1: to transition their genders. You guys are allowing miners to
Speaker 1: take their own lives.
Speaker 2: You're taking it.
Speaker 1: To the next level. This is astonishing. I mean, is
Speaker 1: there any sense of forgive my language, but what the
Speaker 1: fuck are we doing here? I mean, do the Canadians like,
Speaker 1: how are they? How are they responding to this?
Speaker 2: Let me explain to you how we got there quickly
Speaker 2: because we had a bill called Bill C four, which
Speaker 2: was to take parental rights when it came to young
Speaker 2: people who wanted to transition or go down that road.
Speaker 2: We made it illegal for you to counsel in any
Speaker 2: way as a parent or otherwise any person who is
Speaker 2: not heading back to their birth sex. You can counsel
Speaker 2: away from your burth sex, but you can't counsel towards
Speaker 2: your bur sax. That is a jailable offense now in Canada.
Speaker 2: And what that did was the stripped parents of the rights,
Speaker 2: and then that's where the dominoes started to happen. Then
Speaker 2: it was medical decision vaccine. Children were be able to
Speaker 2: choose that for themselves. So we went from transitioning to
Speaker 2: vaccines to death. And that's the slippery slope that we
Speaker 2: went down. Lisa, do you want to comment, You want
Speaker 2: to comment on this one, Lisa, Yeah, no, you.
Speaker 6: Said it just perfectly there. And you know it's it's
Speaker 6: them offering a solution. It's their solution, you know, it's
Speaker 6: Canada's solution, instead of actually helping the people. So like,
Speaker 6: you know, if we have a lot of poverty that's
Speaker 6: happening here. You know, we have a lot of people
Speaker 6: on our streets homeless. So instead of like you know,
Speaker 6: getting to the root of the problem and helping them
Speaker 6: transition into other homes and get them off the streets,
Speaker 6: or like, you know, if they have a really severe addiction,
Speaker 6: instead of helping them with their addiction. It's like, you know,
Speaker 6: we're opening up all these sites here, go ahead, have more,
Speaker 6: have more, you know, go have as many injections as
Speaker 6: you want, and don't worry, we'll watch over you. But
Speaker 6: you know what, if they go looking for help, then
Speaker 6: the first thing is, well, you know what, you live
Speaker 6: on the streets, you don't have any family, you know,
Speaker 6: nobody really cares for you. You're feeling down and out. Hey,
Speaker 6: we've got a solution made and that's the solution, right
Speaker 6: instead of actually, like you know, before, we used to
Speaker 6: care about the people. We used to get them the
Speaker 6: help that they needed, you know, take them to the hospitals,
Speaker 6: get them the help that they needed. And now it's like,
Speaker 6: you know, yeah, here's the solution, just go kill.
Speaker 5: Yourself this But Lisa and Clinton, they're not killing themselves.
Speaker 5: The state is killing them. Let's be quite clear. This
Speaker 5: is not this is medical assistance in dying. Is state murder?
Speaker 5: Really yes? And they're just creating conditions to incentivize people
Speaker 5: to accept state murder. But that's what it is. Your
Speaker 5: your nation state is murdering its own citizens. I mean,
Speaker 5: if it is stark, it's stunning.
Speaker 2: Let me give you two examples, a good reasons examples.
Speaker 2: One was a BC woman who checked herself into the
Speaker 2: hospital because she felt suicidal, and their response to her
Speaker 2: was we can get you psychiatric care in seven months,
Speaker 2: or we can get you made right now. Thankfully, she
Speaker 2: didn't take maids and she shared that story with everybody.
Speaker 2: And then we also have Kayla Pollack who's an Ontario
Speaker 2: mother who after her booster became paralyzed and as part
Speaker 2: of that process, they keep offering her maids as a
Speaker 2: solution to her being keep She's a young mother and
Speaker 2: maids is what they keep offering to her instead of
Speaker 2: dealing with her issue, offering a ramp for her home,
Speaker 2: helping her have a better life, care they keep offering
Speaker 2: her maids. That's exactly where we're at here in Canada now.
Speaker 1: Doctor Malone asked earlier about the psychological warfare tools or
Speaker 1: the propaganda tools that the Canadians may be languishing under
Speaker 1: that is bringing them down this path. And I'm curious,
Speaker 1: you know, just from an American perspective, I have no
Speaker 1: idea if the Canadians will agree with me on this,
Speaker 1: but it seems as if they feed off of your
Speaker 1: kindness and your aversion to shame, you know, like Americans
Speaker 1: tend to have more of the stand up, don't tell
Speaker 1: me to do anything type of mentality, and we you know,
Speaker 1: we don't really care about social shit and not not
Speaker 1: all of us, and many of us do. But I
Speaker 1: think what makes the American spirit kind of unique is
Speaker 1: that we will we will go against the trend, we'll
Speaker 1: go against the crowd, and we'll suffer the consequences. It
Speaker 1: seems as if they are feeding off of your go
Speaker 1: along to get along kindness, you know, apologetic nature to
Speaker 1: take you down a very dark path is that is
Speaker 1: that a good read of what's happening.
Speaker 2: It's very accurate. In fact, they call it like dignity
Speaker 2: and dying, and if you're against it, you are against
Speaker 2: You want pain and suffering, and this is what they
Speaker 2: come to you. It's like, oh, you want people to suffer.
Speaker 2: But they don't even listen to the argument that there's
Speaker 2: paliative care. We've been doing this forever. We understand how
Speaker 2: to address pain at the end of life and how
Speaker 2: to make people comfortable without killing them. But no, this
Speaker 2: is exactly You're right, This is the exactly way they're
Speaker 2: doing and they're using our compassion against us in the
Speaker 2: same way they did during COVID. Don't you care about Grandma?
Speaker 2: You're going to kill grandma if you don't do this
Speaker 2: same thing. But now this is end of life. And
Speaker 2: even Anthony Fauci h Under Anthony Fauci, they did a
Speaker 2: review of can it is progress towards Maids for mature miners,
Speaker 2: and even Anthony Fauci's team said, you guys are gone
Speaker 2: too far. You need to have life affirming care, not
Speaker 2: life ending care when it comes to these situations, and
Speaker 2: Canada quite literally just ignored it and didn't even respond
Speaker 2: to that report out of ni h imagine.
Speaker 3: Tells you you're going too far? Are you really?
Speaker 2: I know that's quite the line, right if he's I
Speaker 2: was going to say.
Speaker 1: If I Fauci things, you guys have lost your mind.
Speaker 1: You have truly lost your minds.
Speaker 2: Yeah, doctor Belon, you want to comment on that?
Speaker 5: Nothing to say I Tony Fauci. My My only comment
Speaker 5: about Tony Fauci is an anecdote. I'm hearing from my
Speaker 5: friends in Italy that Tony is hanging out in Italy,
Speaker 5: hiding in northern Italy, and there's a movement of foot
Speaker 5: to try to get him arrested and potentially deported because
Speaker 5: there are multiple attorneys general in the United States at
Speaker 5: the state level, they're all cooperating to try to bring
Speaker 5: charges against him since he has immunity at the federal level.
Speaker 2: Wow, that I would unify the world pretty quick. I
Speaker 2: would got a vote and come and help, you know. So.
Speaker 5: There was just a poll out an Axios poll, something
Speaker 5: like sixty percent of Americans still support Tony Fauci.
Speaker 2: That's insane.
Speaker 5: It's very biased towards Democrats, but there's a large number
Speaker 5: of Republicans also that support Tony Fauci and still think
Speaker 5: he's a hero.
Speaker 2: Well, what I heard you say is forty percent of
Speaker 2: Americas have higher intelligence. So that's great news. Let's get
Speaker 2: that continue to grow. If we get to forty five,
Speaker 2: fifty to fifty one, we'll be there, right, Michael, What
Speaker 2: are your thoughts about this too, because maids is a
Speaker 2: subject that you and I haven't spoken about before. But
Speaker 2: they're not wrong because part of this depopulation, if that's
Speaker 2: you know, one of the tentacles of globalism is to
Speaker 2: convince your population to kill themselves. What a better tool
Speaker 2: than that?
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, gah, and I went up to Japan.
Speaker 3: That was specifically one of the things we were looking
Speaker 3: into was made actually, but over in Vancouver we went
Speaker 3: to one of those centers where they actually hand out drugs.
Speaker 3: I published video. I mean, guys stooped over he can't
Speaker 3: light his drug pipe and walked in here where they're
Speaker 3: given literally the government's giving drugs to people.
Speaker 4: They kicked us out.
Speaker 3: But you know, when I was stationed in the army,
Speaker 3: and I was in the army about five hundred years
Speaker 3: ago it seems like now, but in Germany, and I
Speaker 3: was in special Forces and occasionally we talked about, you know,
Speaker 3: how did they get the Germans to do this? Like,
Speaker 3: how did they, you know, really get all these people
Speaker 3: that were seeing around us, like their grandparents, to load
Speaker 3: people up on trains and do mass murder. You know,
Speaker 3: we just thought, I don't there's something wrong with Germans, right,
Speaker 3: But you know that stuck with me pretty hard because
Speaker 3: I'm like, it doesn't reconcile with my current knowledge set.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: You know, when that book Nazi Doctors came out, I
Speaker 3: bought that book and I read it. That was a
Speaker 3: long time ago, and I was again trying to figure
Speaker 3: out how did a population do this, because it's not
Speaker 3: been the only one. Now since that time, I've learned
Speaker 3: a lot more and traveled around the world a lot,
Speaker 3: spent most of my life in other countries, right, and
Speaker 3: a lot of time in war actually, And what I
Speaker 3: found is ordinary men, you know the book ordinary men,
Speaker 3: Ordinary men will do these things, will do the maid
Speaker 3: they'll do the medical insistence and dying. They'll actually hand
Speaker 3: out drugs to their own people, our own border patrol.
Speaker 3: I've seen our own border patrol load up thousands of
Speaker 3: people right in front of my eyes when I'm making
Speaker 3: video of them disclosed, right, thousands I went across the
Speaker 3: entire southern border. I mean probably literally, without exaggerating, probably
Speaker 3: tens of thousands, because it took months. And I would
Speaker 3: ask them, why are you doing this? You're invading our
Speaker 3: own country, And people would literally say things like, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm doing my job. You know, I gotta gonna what
Speaker 3: are you doing here?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 3: And you know you know, or you're the ones that
Speaker 3: would talk with you. You know, I don't want to
Speaker 3: get fired. I mean, you know, it's a good job.
Speaker 3: I'm like, yeah, but you're invading our country. You're not
Speaker 3: going to get the retirement that you're planning on if
Speaker 3: our country is dead. In fact, you'll probably be dead too,
Speaker 3: because we're bringing in tens of millions of these people
Speaker 3: from incompatible countries. Again, I've spent most of my life
Speaker 3: downrange in ninety nine countries, right. I spent most of
Speaker 3: my life in places like you know, Afghanistan, India, you know,
Speaker 3: all over the place, right.
Speaker 4: And I've learned a few things.
Speaker 3: One is that some fish don't mix well in the
Speaker 3: same aquarium. And the weapons of mass migration and these
Speaker 3: you know, psychological warfare, drugs, all these different weapons are
Speaker 3: all being brought to bear at once. But instead of
Speaker 3: us talking about the symptoms, like you know, why are
Speaker 3: they doing this when they could just make them better?
Speaker 3: Why are they giving them drugs? Actually we should be
Speaker 3: talking about the people that are actually doing it, so
Speaker 3: identify them in specific countries.
Speaker 4: Now, the larger level is kind of hard to identify.
Speaker 3: It gets to be kind of nebulous up there, but
Speaker 3: we can identify local faces who were doing it, right,
Speaker 3: the people who were running the places.
Speaker 4: Where they're doing made the.
Speaker 3: Prime ministers and that sort of thing in various countries,
Speaker 3: like Mark Ruta when he was in Netherlands, you know,
Speaker 3: taking the farms away. You know, those are specific puppets, right,
Speaker 3: puppetitions as some people call them, right, and those names
Speaker 3: are on the dollars, let's say. And that is the problem.
Speaker 3: We're talking about symptoms all the time when we're talking about, well,
Speaker 3: they should get them off the drugs, and actually we
Speaker 3: should be talking about who's doing this, like who's the
Speaker 3: people that are Like Secretary of Mayorchis came down to
Speaker 3: the Darien, right, you know, he was the Secretary of
Speaker 3: Homeland Security. He landed there on April nineteenth I think
Speaker 3: twenty twenty two. I waited for him for four days.
Speaker 3: He landed right in front of me. Four blackhawks with
Speaker 3: General Laura Richardson was commander of Southcolm at the time,
Speaker 3: and the ambassador of Ponte Us ambassador to Panama. They
Speaker 3: all landed down there, and they brought more money and
Speaker 3: increased the size of the invasion camps of the Darien Gap. Right,
Speaker 3: so we know who did it. May Orcus, you were
Speaker 3: the messenger. Now he's not the big boss, but we
Speaker 3: know that he is directly connected to somebody who's directly connected.
Speaker 3: In any case, may Orcus and Fauci and all those
Speaker 3: clowns should be imprisoned. They should be flex cuff sitting
Speaker 3: on the curb and hauled away to prison.
Speaker 1: I think, what's a really interesting insight into my orcis
Speaker 1: is head of DHS. He was also the one that
Speaker 1: gave a clean bill of health to the head of
Speaker 1: the Secret Service after the attempt on Trump's life. I
Speaker 1: found that to be a very fascinating connection, given that
Speaker 1: he was largely, if not the primary figure that allowed
Speaker 1: for the enormous invasion into the United States. I wanted
Speaker 1: to tie back into what he was talking about earlier
Speaker 1: with how people went along with the Holocaust and other
Speaker 1: atrocities throughout human history, and I think many of us
Speaker 1: all thought, this is an anomaly, this is an impossibility,
Speaker 1: this would never happen in a society like ours, and
Speaker 1: then the lockdowns happen and we all go, oh, I
Speaker 1: get it now, like I understand it. But this is
Speaker 1: the point I wanted to make, is that Murray Rothbart
Speaker 1: actually had a tremendous insight in this. He's a famous
Speaker 1: Austrian economist and kind of a founding father of libertarianism,
Speaker 1: and he did in his kind of magnum opus, an
Speaker 1: Anatomy of the State, he describes how the nation state
Speaker 1: rises and falls, and he says that the final iteration.
Speaker 1: He's doing this based off of analysis of historical examples
Speaker 1: of the state, and he says that the final iteration
Speaker 1: of the state is scientism. So once statism loses its
Speaker 1: appeal to the population, it loses its ability to control
Speaker 1: the masses. They then relent or they basically are left
Speaker 1: with using scientism and migrating like an appeal to authority
Speaker 1: through medical science. And this is why you see so
Speaker 1: many examples of states in their dying days. They rely
Speaker 1: on appeals to authority into scientific figures that ultimately end
Speaker 1: up and you know, genocide or starvation. The USSR had
Speaker 1: great examples of this too, where you would have them
Speaker 1: trying to change their food production and ending up killing
Speaker 1: tens of millions of people. It happened in Maos, China too,
Speaker 1: So it's like, this is this is what humanity does.
Speaker 1: And I think that's that's the one thing that I
Speaker 1: just wanted to bring up to mister Yawan, is to
Speaker 1: you know, we're trying to figure out who's responsible for
Speaker 1: these things. But because it's happened in historical cycles, it
Speaker 1: makes me wonder if this isn't just a natural phenomenon,
Speaker 1: as like the power structure starts to erode and the
Speaker 1: people that are trying to maintain their their hold on power.
Speaker 1: This is just what happens in human nature. Is there
Speaker 1: any possibility of that? Or does this have to be
Speaker 1: a coordinated attack? I mean the lockdown certainly looked coordinated,
Speaker 1: but I don't know.
Speaker 2: So is kind of exactly over okay, over okay, And
Speaker 2: but I actually wanted and thank you doctor Molons so
Speaker 2: much for bringing this topic up and having an interest
Speaker 2: in this. So let me tell you how this happens
Speaker 2: in Canada. There isn't like a bill that got passed
Speaker 2: and said let's go ahead and do mates. They modified
Speaker 2: the Criminal Code murder portion of the Criminal Code to
Speaker 2: create an exception. So it's not even healthcare at this stage.
Speaker 2: But here's a scary part. They're headed towards making this
Speaker 2: healthcare because there's hospitals that will not perform this procedure
Speaker 2: because it's by choice right now, the hospital can choose
Speaker 2: not to do it. So what they ended up doing,
Speaker 2: for one particular situation was there was a Christian base
Speaker 2: or a religious based hospital and they said there was
Speaker 2: no way we're doing this. So what did they do.
Speaker 2: The expropriated some land from that hospital and built a
Speaker 2: building to do just that perform Maid's procedures there. So
Speaker 2: that's how they did that. And then in Quebec, this
Speaker 2: is very scary. Quebec is now moving it into healthcare.
Speaker 2: So why doing that. That's going to be a requirement
Speaker 2: for hospitals to go ahead and offer this procedure because
Speaker 2: it will be considered healthcare. And when Quebec does stuff
Speaker 2: like that, Canada soon follows. Got to pay attention. So
Speaker 2: right now, it's just an exception to the criminal Code
Speaker 2: in all of Canada, but they're heading towards making it healthcare,
Speaker 2: which will make it a mandatory procedure for all hospitals
Speaker 2: in Canada. And that's how they're rolling this out right now.
Speaker 5: And I can I mention one other thing as we're
Speaker 5: talking along this thread, because it is intertwined. Basically, what
Speaker 5: happened to the Germans and what I heard was the
Speaker 5: development or the starting of the development of the logic
Speaker 5: that people were just doing their job. And this is
Speaker 5: kind of the bureaucrats creed I'm just doing my job.
Speaker 5: I'm just a cog. I'm not responsible. So I just
Speaker 5: wanted to put a pin in the work of Hanna
Speaker 5: Aren't and in particular Eikman in Jerusalem, where she makes
Speaker 5: the observation that this is the banality of evil, that
Speaker 5: this concept of evil that we have through Christian theology
Speaker 5: and other other religions, uh, you know, we equate it
Speaker 5: with the devil and things like this, but in fact
Speaker 5: it often manifests in this very trivial way of just saying, hey,
Speaker 5: I'm just doing my job and I can't be blamed
Speaker 5: I'm just a cog in the wheel. Uh and and
Speaker 5: uh it's necessary a course to continue doing my job
Speaker 5: because I have to pay my mortgage, feed my kids,
Speaker 5: blah blah blah, fill in the blank. And and this
Speaker 5: this is absolutely how they get you the I think
Speaker 5: this is what's behind a lot of the indebtedness too.
Speaker 5: I think that, and you know, aligned with you, And
Speaker 5: I'm glad to hear you quoting Murray Rothbart, one of
Speaker 5: my favorites. I'll be speaking at Mesus in a in
Speaker 5: about a month again. So so, uh, what's deployed is
Speaker 5: this form of indentured servitude through indebtedness that has and
Speaker 5: through the kind of industrialization process that has torn the
Speaker 5: families apart. If you think about it, the real rot
Speaker 5: starts with the dissolution of the family and the dissolution
Speaker 5: of community. And once they've got that broken, then they
Speaker 5: can manipulate the populations in a variety of different ways.
Speaker 5: And you don't become becoupled. You're unhinged from any other
Speaker 5: social structure that might say to you, it might give
Speaker 5: you a clue, no, this isn't right. And I think
Speaker 5: what's happened with Maid is just so overt I mean
Speaker 5: the rest of the world. You want to not to
Speaker 5: shame Canada, but certainly for much of the world that
Speaker 5: becomes aware of your made policies, it's shocking. It's shocking
Speaker 5: that a civilized nation in the British tradition steeped in
Speaker 5: Judeo Christian ethics, and this was alluded to a few
Speaker 5: minutes ago, just general niceness. I mean, that's what I've
Speaker 5: always thought about the Canadian people historically, is when I
Speaker 5: go up there to show horses or whatever, they're just
Speaker 5: really nice people. And that's all gone now in some
Speaker 5: strange way as if. But the same is also true
Speaker 5: with Australia and New Zealand. There's something going on with
Speaker 5: these former British nation states that is making them curiously
Speaker 5: vulnerable to this type of manipulation. And maybe maybe some
Speaker 5: of the things we've talked about here touch on that,
Speaker 5: but there's Canada does seem to be a particularly egregious
Speaker 5: example of you know, a nice, you know, Judeo Christian
Speaker 5: society that's been torn apart and is now endorsing policies
Speaker 5: that are just clearly obscene, are are horrific.
Speaker 1: Just to connect the back to the Rothbard for a second.
Speaker 1: He was talking about how the like the foundational destruction
Speaker 1: that brings a society down is the destruction of the
Speaker 1: family unit. I would argue that the initial starting point
Speaker 1: is actually the destruction of the dollar or the exchange
Speaker 1: of currency. This is also another Roth party and insight.
Speaker 1: But once you have an inflationary wave, yes, that inflation,
Speaker 1: that's when both parents have to start to work, That's
Speaker 1: when they can't take care of their kids. The family
Speaker 1: unit starts to evolve, crime starts to increase, then the
Speaker 1: state power starts to increase. Everything that we've dealt with
Speaker 1: over the past one hundred years is a consequence of
Speaker 1: nineteen thirteen.
Speaker 5: And Quinn, tell you're on a rip, inform us about
Speaker 5: what is inflation useful for for the nation state? What
Speaker 5: is the nation's state use inflation for? And that's covered
Speaker 5: in the monograph of What Happened to My Money? As
Speaker 5: I recall from Rothbart.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I mean endless war is the primary outcome
Speaker 1: of the valuation of currency. Oh go, you give me
Speaker 1: the end I'm not sure.
Speaker 5: Well, yeah, it's so, it's two things. Inflation is used
Speaker 5: by the state to support two things, social programs and war. Yep,
Speaker 5: that's it.
Speaker 1: And then and then at that point, your your population
Speaker 1: is so reliant on the state that they will continue
Speaker 1: to vote for more and more state large ass in
Speaker 1: which case they will absorb more and more of your rights,
Speaker 1: more and more of your capital via taxation, and then
Speaker 1: ultimately your slave. And I think the reason I think
Speaker 1: that some of this is more organic than it is orchestrated,
Speaker 1: and excuse the blurring of my camera, is because the
Speaker 1: entire world is a wash in debt as a consequence
Speaker 1: of the era, the century of central banking after nineteen thirteen.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're talking about quad drillions of debt. So
Speaker 1: all of these nation states are essentially underwater if not
Speaker 1: for the printing press, if not for their capacity to borrow.
Speaker 1: So I think that what we're experiencing, and the reason
Speaker 1: that fifth generation warfare is being waged against the populations
Speaker 1: of the world. And I know this sounds totally lunatic,
Speaker 1: fringe to even talk like this, but I genuinely think
Speaker 1: I'm right, is that they have to transition to a
Speaker 1: new currency unit. This is the whole reason that the
Speaker 1: electronic Yeah, the electronic currency has been floated. In fact,
Speaker 1: Canada and Carney is almost certainly going to usher that
Speaker 1: in upon the Canadians.
Speaker 5: Bursul von d Leiden was just endorsing it at a
Speaker 5: year ago Union.
Speaker 1: Yep, the digital Euro exactly right.
Speaker 2: In fact, we just released a video from two thousand
Speaker 2: and nine when Mark Carney was asked by Maxine Bernier
Speaker 2: about the inflation rate at that time, because Carney was
Speaker 2: the Governor of the Bank of Canada at that time,
Speaker 2: and he just flat out said, look, there's a globalist
Speaker 2: target at two percent. In fact, Canada ended up doing
Speaker 2: two point five percent from that moment all the way
Speaker 2: to now, which totally devalued us. And the third thing
Speaker 2: that actually happens at least in Canada here, doctor Malone,
Speaker 2: is the wealth that has been accumulated, it gets deteriorated.
Speaker 2: Your wealth is worth a lot less, your generational wealth
Speaker 2: and what you're going to pass on is worth less
Speaker 2: and less as inflation kicks in. And you asked a
Speaker 2: great question. I'm not sure who it was, baby, it
Speaker 2: was doctor Malone. But how is this happening in the Commonwealth. Well,
Speaker 2: there's a trusted news news initiative which actually is controlling
Speaker 2: a lot of narratives around Canada. And when you control
Speaker 2: the media, you're going to control the population because they
Speaker 2: still trusted even at this stage. They put Boord Trusted
Speaker 2: News News Initiative in it. So Michael, actually, yeah, Michael,
Speaker 2: how big of an impact would something like that organization
Speaker 2: have on people? And then historically, let's use your six
Speaker 2: thousand dollars worth of books and you're reading to our
Speaker 2: advantage here historically, how do populations respond to this?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 3: Interesting by the way, speaking of money and all these
Speaker 3: I got these these gold backed things I use in
Speaker 3: as bookmarks. I got that Adams, so I carry it.
Speaker 3: But whenever I buy new books, that'll be my new
Speaker 3: book mark.
Speaker 4: Uh, gold back currency.
Speaker 3: The well, I think some of you know to the
Speaker 3: point earlier about you know, this seems natural actually, you know,
Speaker 3: and I studied history voraciously. I spent all day yesterday
Speaker 3: actually in the library beside the canal, by the Panama Canal,
Speaker 3: and so I'm either going there in the wars.
Speaker 4: Or whatever, or or in the libraries.
Speaker 3: And and it does seem based on just seeing stuff
Speaker 3: around the world and reading a lot. And I do
Speaker 3: think genocide. I know this will sound controversial, but it
Speaker 3: is just a thing that humans do like monkeys gonna
Speaker 3: kill the other tribe, or one ant goes one ant
Speaker 3: nest goes and robs the other. I mean, people just
Speaker 3: do that, and I mean I see it everywhere. There
Speaker 3: are soft genocides I've seen, and then the more hard
Speaker 3: genocide heart is just like you know, you take the
Speaker 3: machetes and who who decent footsies go at it right,
Speaker 3: and hard genocides happen all the time. When I was
Speaker 3: in Tibet, of course, that was a sort of a
Speaker 3: mixture between hard and soft. Hard, you know, I killed
Speaker 3: a bunch of Tibetans, the Chinese did, and soft.
Speaker 4: You know, ran them out right. Now.
Speaker 3: When I was in Hong Kong, I got kicked out
Speaker 3: of Hong Kong in twenty twenty. Chinese don't like me,
Speaker 3: but the I was in Hong Kong a lot. I
Speaker 3: was in there, especially during twenty nineteen when they were
Speaker 3: having this final spasms there. But the Hong Kongers would
Speaker 3: tell me all the time. One of the main ways
Speaker 3: that they've you know, deluded our power, the Hong Konger's
Speaker 3: power is by migration. They would bring in like one
Speaker 3: hundred to one hundred and fifty Mainlanders per day, year
Speaker 3: after year, and they would take key positions like as
Speaker 3: teachers and as politicians, elected politicians, policemen of course, and
Speaker 3: all these different professors in the universities. There was a
Speaker 3: Confucians institute there in Hong Kong University.
Speaker 4: I mean I went into it.
Speaker 3: I went inside the there's a Confucius Institute right around
Speaker 3: the corner from me, like like five minutes walk away
Speaker 3: right now. I mean, they these Confucius institutes are another
Speaker 3: way that they infiltrate the schools. And I've gone into
Speaker 3: that in detail in the past. But but what they
Speaker 3: did was they did a soft dilusion dilution, not dilution,
Speaker 3: dilution of the of the of the Cantonese speaking Hong
Speaker 3: Kongers with Mandarin speaking Mainlanders. In school, they taught to
Speaker 3: children that you have to speak Mandarin, not Cantonese, because
Speaker 3: Cantonese is basically for Chinese rednecks, right, And so they
Speaker 3: take it linguistically, they take them over. And I see
Speaker 3: this all over the world. I saw it in Nepal.
Speaker 3: I was in Nepal during that war for about a year.
Speaker 3: I was out with the moust A lot and they
Speaker 3: were doing the same things. I see it everywhere. I
Speaker 3: see it in southern Thailand. You know, I spent two
Speaker 3: years in Iraq to in Afghanistan. I've seen the same.
Speaker 3: One thing about war, by the way, I think it's
Speaker 3: probably a little bit like veterinary science. If you know
Speaker 3: how a mouse works more or less, and how an
Speaker 3: elephant works more or less, and how a blue whale
Speaker 3: works more or less, you know basically.
Speaker 4: How all of them work more or less.
Speaker 3: Wars are all the same, and they're all very very different, right,
Speaker 3: and as long as you're talking about the same classes
Speaker 3: of war, whether it's kinetic or whatever. And one thing
Speaker 3: I will say about how close out is when wars
Speaker 3: always do three things predictably do three things?
Speaker 4: What is? Wars grow? They grow, and.
Speaker 3: They grow unpredictably because they're complex systems, and then they
Speaker 3: almost always last longer than most people expect.
Speaker 4: Anyway, I could go on for hours about this. But
Speaker 4: how does all these how do all these genocides?
Speaker 2: Well, let's come back to that part in a second.
Speaker 2: Is doctor Malone, I think I wants to mention something.
Speaker 5: So we're hearkening back to Murray Rothbard. And so this
Speaker 5: is causing me to think as we're talking about genocide.
Speaker 5: Roth part asserts there's only two ways to develop wealth,
Speaker 5: to gain well, one is through your labor and the
Speaker 5: others through theft. Is genocide a form of theft? I
Speaker 5: think it is. I think that what we're doing, what
Speaker 5: is being done through the vehicle of genocide, is stealing
Speaker 5: assets or a cast which is facilitating that. And if
Speaker 5: you want to see a graphic example of that, read
Speaker 5: the Kissinger Report, which is United States policy foreign policy
Speaker 5: right now.
Speaker 4: The Kissinger Report.
Speaker 5: Specifically talks about the need to depopulate or maintain low
Speaker 5: populations in regions of the world that have significant natural assets,
Speaker 5: particularly mineral assets, so that the United States and its
Speaker 5: corporations can expl light those resources. We don't want those
Speaker 5: nation states with those mineral resources to have large populations
Speaker 5: because that then becomes a barrier for exploitation, and that
Speaker 5: is theft. That's I mean, I just want to throw
Speaker 5: that out that what we're observing in these trends towards
Speaker 5: genocide is really a form of wealth accumulation through depopulation,
Speaker 5: which is virtually theft. They are stealing the wealth of
Speaker 5: nations through driving depopulation.
Speaker 1: I agree with that assessment. Well, what's so frustrating is
Speaker 1: that it's also the destruction of the productive capacity of
Speaker 1: the humanity that they're destroying, and therefore they are in
Speaker 1: fact destroying immense wealth. I mean the lockdowns are a
Speaker 1: great example of this. I mean, by shutting down the
Speaker 1: global economy, or at least a huge swaths of it,
Speaker 1: you evaporated trillions of dollars in actualductive wealth, not print wealth,
Speaker 1: which is what the nation states of the world responded to,
Speaker 1: was like, yeah, sure, we're wiping out trillions in productive wealth,
Speaker 1: but we're just going to print it, and so everything's
Speaker 1: going to be fine. It's like, oh, well, here comes
Speaker 1: the inflationary wave, of course inevitably, but I just it's
Speaker 1: so short sighted, and I think that's what frustrates me
Speaker 1: more than anything. It's like, I sometimes will try and
Speaker 1: put myself into the shoes of our overlords, of the
Speaker 1: central bankers of the world, and I'm like, you guys
Speaker 1: have it so good, you're profiting so much from the
Speaker 1: system as it stands today, and yet you're still taking
Speaker 1: the short sided approach that we are going to, you know,
Speaker 1: basically wipe these wipe out humanity. Therefore we can accumulate
Speaker 1: more of these natural resources, but simultaneously you're sacrificing trillions
Speaker 1: in wealth that would have been produced by those people,
Speaker 1: which only arrogant.
Speaker 5: Yes they are, they're just in there. They're arrogant and
Speaker 5: they're narcissistic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a batter makes And I think you've nailed it,
Speaker 2: doctor Malone, because if you see with Ukraine, what is
Speaker 2: it that the US is gonna pull out of there?
Speaker 5: Rare earth?
Speaker 2: They're going to make a deal there. What are they
Speaker 2: looking at? Greenland for earth?
Speaker 5: You know what? That can? I can I So I'm
Speaker 5: not in with that rare earth argument. I think that
Speaker 5: what's really going on in Ukraine is it is literally
Speaker 5: the world spread basket. It is some of the most
Speaker 5: productive agricultural land in the world, and they have massive petroleum,
Speaker 5: particularly natural gas deposits. And in particular, what I've learned
Speaker 5: is all along the coast of the Black Sea, it's
Speaker 5: just full of natural gas. So the whole well, we're
Speaker 5: going to go there for rare earth so we can
Speaker 5: build batteries for our teslas or whatever the thing is.
Speaker 5: I think that's a little bit of a ruse. I
Speaker 5: think that the Ukraine situation has a lot to do
Speaker 5: with productive agricultural land and petroleum. You know. I since
Speaker 5: we're in this Austrian school frame of reference and keep
Speaker 5: coming back to it, energy is kind of the only
Speaker 5: form of capital these days. It is the ultimate form
Speaker 5: of capital.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And where I was going with that is that's
Speaker 2: a term I didn't hear until very recently. But it
Speaker 2: is definitely a resource issue. They're going after resources and
Speaker 2: the population is in the way. So this is not
Speaker 2: a I don't think it's to control the population. I
Speaker 2: think it is to control.
Speaker 5: Who has the contract. I don't know if Canadians are
Speaker 5: attuned to this. Who did the United States government grant
Speaker 5: the contract to to rebuild Ukraine Rimshot Rock?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, and then that's where the Pamina Canal and
Speaker 2: the Northwest Passage comes in, because that'll be moving of resources.
Speaker 2: So I think it's definitely going to be a resource issue.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna come to Lisa, and then I'm gonna come
Speaker 2: to Michael quickly, and because we do have to start
Speaker 2: wrapping up and get everybody back to their evening now media, Lisa,
Speaker 2: one of the things that you know well is I'm
Speaker 2: sure doctor Malone knows as well. As media has been
Speaker 2: weaponar is to gainst people that speak up and make conversation.
Speaker 2: But another thing that's been weaponized here is our stability
Speaker 2: and our security in the country. When you're worried about
Speaker 2: where your food comes from, guess what you don't do.
Speaker 2: You don't go fight your government. And when you don't have,
Speaker 2: you know, money coming in and you're scared that you're
Speaker 2: going to lose everything, hold on about that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, guess what the best way to get a revolution is?
Speaker 3: Uh is a a food problem? You know, the hungry
Speaker 3: forties and the eighteen forties in Europe there was a
Speaker 3: lot of revolutions what three deaths and I think something
Speaker 3: like along those lines, and it was related to food.
Speaker 4: Food.
Speaker 2: Food.
Speaker 3: If you want to be a government destroyed cut off
Speaker 3: their food supplied, that government will be destroyed, right.
Speaker 2: And I think what we're seeing here in the modern
Speaker 2: times is they kind of find a line just enough
Speaker 2: to keep you hungry and distracted, but not enough to
Speaker 2: go ahead and stand up against it. And that's where
Speaker 2: I think we're headed in Canada. I think we might
Speaker 2: actually be getting to that point. And then, Michael, that's
Speaker 2: why I'm going to come back to you in a second,
Speaker 2: because I think you have you can warn us about
Speaker 2: what's about to happen if we don't smart enough before
Speaker 2: we get there. But Lisa, as somebody who's been targeted
Speaker 2: by the media, you know what it's like. There's attacking
Speaker 2: you now, they're attacking all of Canadians and Americans now
Speaker 2: as well. Do you think when you talk to your constituents,
Speaker 2: are they distracted or do they just not care about
Speaker 2: what's going on?
Speaker 6: Oh, they do care, but they are distracted, and they're very,
Speaker 6: very fearful. They're very very afraid because anybody here who
Speaker 6: does speak out, they start targeting them at their place
Speaker 6: of employment, trying to get them to lose their jobs.
Speaker 6: In fact, I just heard recently that a member in
Speaker 6: the government's family member decided to email another person's place
Speaker 6: of employment and try and get them fired for some
Speaker 6: statements that they made on social media. So that's the
Speaker 6: point that we're at right now. And you know, I
Speaker 6: have a lot of my supporters, a lot of people
Speaker 6: that are sticking up from you, even if they're not
Speaker 6: my supporter, but they still want to stick up for
Speaker 6: me because yes, I haven't been paid for nine months
Speaker 6: now as in elected official, for standing up. But they're
Speaker 6: afraid because they will lose their jobs they if they
Speaker 6: speak up, because the media will target them. People over
Speaker 6: social media will target them. And you know, the Canadians
Speaker 6: here aren't as nice as you think a lot of them,
Speaker 6: because they do actually phone up employers and try and
Speaker 6: get people fired so they can't provide for the family,
Speaker 6: so they can't put the food on the tables. It's
Speaker 6: really really crazy what's happening over here right now in Canada,
Speaker 6: and we need to put a stop to it very
Speaker 6: quickly because it is starting to trickle, like you know,
Speaker 6: all across to the other provinces right now. And we're
Speaker 6: at stayed over here right now in Ontario.
Speaker 5: This sounds like CCP struggle sessions.
Speaker 2: True, And Michael, what they say is it will take
Speaker 2: two weeks of empty shells and then that's it. It's over.
Speaker 2: The system's broken. Is that what you're heading to?
Speaker 4: Yah? Maybe more like three days of that a couple
Speaker 4: of days.
Speaker 6: I have to agree with you on that. I think
Speaker 6: it would be just a few days and yeah, chaos
Speaker 6: will be completely out there and it will destroy people.
Speaker 6: I mean, look what happened during the lockdowns right what
Speaker 6: happened with the toilet paper frenzy, or you know, the
Speaker 6: food the lack of the food on the shelves. People
Speaker 6: were starting fist fights in the aisles that grocery stores,
Speaker 6: grabbing like, you know, the last thing off of the shelf.
Speaker 6: I mean, it was completely insane. Imagine now if that
Speaker 6: comes and that happens with our food sources, it's very pretty.
Speaker 2: And one way to clear out the shelves is a
Speaker 2: trade war. That's exactly how you do some of that.
Speaker 2: You have a trade war. We won't we don't grow
Speaker 2: oranges in Canada. There's a lot of products that we
Speaker 2: need that we can't make here in Canada. So one
Speaker 2: way to go ahead and empty those shelves is to
Speaker 2: do a trade war. Yeah, Michael, do you want to
Speaker 2: kind of finish up that one thought about how people
Speaker 2: will respond?
Speaker 3: Well, you know, again, there's many weapons being brought to
Speaker 3: bear here, and doctor Malone's right, this is about routes
Speaker 3: and resources, is what's it about.
Speaker 4: That's what it's about.
Speaker 3: So I mean that's why I'm Panama Canal is out
Speaker 3: my window right because this is a one of the
Speaker 3: seven strategic naval routes. Right, I think eventually you're going
Speaker 3: to see us go for the Suez Canal too. I
Speaker 3: know that sounds kind of crazy, but I say a
Speaker 3: lot of crazy things, like nord Stream is going to
Speaker 3: get interrupted, and growning you get knocked out right and
Speaker 3: they turn out to be right. So I think we're
Speaker 3: gonna end up going for Suez and I eventually and
Speaker 3: bab ball Mandab, I don't know how we're going to do.
Speaker 4: It because we haven't beat back to the hooties yet.
Speaker 3: And then eventually straight up our moves. Of course, that
Speaker 3: would mean war with Iran, and I don't know how
Speaker 3: that would turn out either, But I think that's what
Speaker 3: we see accruing along the magnetic lines here. And one
Speaker 3: thing that I've warned about thousands of times in about
Speaker 3: the last five years is food. I think we're gonna
Speaker 3: end up with food problems, like serious problems.
Speaker 4: That's one of the reasons.
Speaker 3: That's one of the ways that I predicted that Nordstream
Speaker 3: and growning in would be cut was because I know
Speaker 3: that to make nitrogenous fertilizers you need natural gas so
Speaker 3: that you can take that hydrogen and you do the
Speaker 3: Hyberbosch process, you know, combine it with the nitrogen that
Speaker 3: we're breathing and make ammonia. Right, and so methodically our
Speaker 3: food supplies have been attacked. Food prices continue to go up.
Speaker 3: I mean, at some point, whether it be power outage
Speaker 3: or something along those lines, we could have severe food shortages.
Speaker 4: And then it's over.
Speaker 3: I mean, at that point, nobody's going to listen to
Speaker 3: any law enforcement. Law enforcement aren't gonna be doing their
Speaker 3: jobs anyway, and everybody's going it's gonna be planning of
Speaker 3: the apes. And that's what generally happened. We should come
Speaker 3: on one time and just talk for about an hour
Speaker 3: about famine. It's something I've studied quite a lot because
Speaker 3: remember pandemic, famine, war.
Speaker 4: It's like the triangle of debt.
Speaker 3: If you get a big war or a big pandemic
Speaker 3: or a big famine, you'll always get the other two.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: If you get a big one big pandemic, always you'll
Speaker 3: end up with famine war.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: And likewise, I mean, this COVID thing is obviously bullshit, right,
Speaker 3: I mean, but it was very effective at pushing people
Speaker 3: into the real weapon, the jab.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: That was a forcing maneuver to force people into the
Speaker 3: ambush basically, right, and so anyway, long story short, we
Speaker 3: should talk about famine sometimes.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, we'll have you back for that for sure. And Clint,
Speaker 2: one of my concerns here is things like fifteen minute cities,
Speaker 2: and people don't understand that what those are going to
Speaker 2: be are zones that you're locked down into. So Zone
Speaker 2: A may have something the Zone B doesn't. And even
Speaker 2: here in Canada to put it in around hospitals and
Speaker 2: you can't go from hospital hospital because it's not in
Speaker 2: your zone or your territory. So they're heading in that
Speaker 2: direction as well. How long do you think we would
Speaker 2: take in the US, because we're here in three days,
Speaker 2: it would be crazy in Canada. How long do you
Speaker 2: think we'd take in the US if the foods of
Speaker 2: shortage and famine was starting to kick in, Oh, it'd
Speaker 2: be very fast.
Speaker 1: I mean, particularly for Americans, we're just a wash in
Speaker 1: abundance and we have been for so long. Any sense
Speaker 1: of shortages, I mean you already saw a microcosm of
Speaker 1: that just with the toilet paper panic of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I mean, we lost our effing minds because we thought
Speaker 1: that we were going to be aut a toilet paper,
Speaker 1: which by the way, is something you can absolutely live without,
Speaker 1: but you definitely can't live without food. So yeah, if
Speaker 1: you don't have food, it would be rapid. I am
Speaker 1: actually more optimistic than the panel, which is rare. I
Speaker 1: don't think that our overlords want to starve us out,
Speaker 1: because I think that's the only way that they actually
Speaker 1: get attacked themselves. So I think that they will keep
Speaker 1: the food going as long as possible, but they're going
Speaker 1: to try and take as much in terms of you know,
Speaker 1: economic wealth in the meantime. I don't think that they're
Speaker 1: interested unless they, you know, have a loyal army that
Speaker 1: will wage war against the American people or the people
Speaker 1: of the world. I just I think that's I think
Speaker 1: that's unlikely. But here's the problem they are. They are
Speaker 1: philosophically so many of them are committed to a Marxist worldview,
Speaker 1: and they have really lost track of the value of
Speaker 1: a free market and what is necessary in terms of
Speaker 1: capital allotment in the production of food. That just because
Speaker 1: they're so detached from reality, they could unintentionally create pandemics.
Speaker 1: But I'll mistery on maybe right, they may starve us too.
Speaker 2: I don't know. Well, one of the terms that they
Speaker 2: have for us is useless eaters, So they definitely true
Speaker 2: as somebody that consumes to food. Now, doctor Man, I.
Speaker 1: Think they would rather kill us in a different way
Speaker 1: than starving us out because then we get violent.
Speaker 2: But sorry, go ahead, yeah, yeah, I don't I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I wish I had a better idea.
Speaker 2: But doctor Malone, Psychologically, how do we break out of
Speaker 2: this psychosis? Is there a way? Like these conversations help?
Speaker 2: But if if our government just put another gun band
Speaker 2: in place, there's another one hundred and seventy six guns
Speaker 2: or something like that that they just put on a
Speaker 2: do not own list and they're going after the guns.
Speaker 2: They they I think are worried that we're going to
Speaker 2: do exactly what we're talking about here. We're going to
Speaker 2: fight back.
Speaker 5: Well, and that was successful in Australia, right, So what
Speaker 5: is what is it that we can do to break
Speaker 5: out of it? What Mattias Desmond teaches is that the
Speaker 5: easiest way is to substitute something else, so another fear object,
Speaker 5: another authoritarian, so we can we can look for that
Speaker 5: that we would see the rise of some other entity
Speaker 5: that would distract everyone. And once people are in that
Speaker 5: kind of fear loop. They've become very susceptible to that
Speaker 5: type of suggestion and manipulation. But longer term, what I
Speaker 5: keep counseling is, in just to Clint's point about what
Speaker 5: it would take for the United States, I think that
Speaker 5: the United States is not monomorphic. We have a bicoastal
Speaker 5: United States, and then we have the pejority of the
Speaker 5: flyover states. Rural America is a different place. It's a
Speaker 5: different place in terms of food supply, it's a different
Speaker 5: place in terms of self reliance. It's a different place
Speaker 5: in terms of virtuals versus physicals. In rural America, we
Speaker 5: live a very different life. I say we because I
Speaker 5: live in rural Virginia, and I don't think that we
Speaker 5: would see in my community the same type of short
Speaker 5: term response that we would see, say up the road
Speaker 5: in Washington, d C. In terms of what do we
Speaker 5: do to free ourselves from this, it's fascinating to go back,
Speaker 5: and we've written multiple substacks about this, to go back
Speaker 5: and look at the Victory gardens. The victory garden movement
Speaker 5: during both World War One and World War Two got
Speaker 5: to the point where general populace was producing more agricultural goods,
Speaker 5: and we're coming out of the established farms and agribusiness structure.
Speaker 5: A decentralized production of food is how we free ourselves.
Speaker 5: That in freeing ourselves from the debt, is how we
Speaker 5: get out of this indentured servitude loop. So, for instance,
Speaker 5: one of the easiest things to do, and I suspect
Speaker 5: it's still not so hard in Canada chickens. Chickens are
Speaker 5: incredible in terms of their ability to feed you. I've
Speaker 5: got way more eggs than I can deal with here
Speaker 5: they go to the dogs, despite all of the fear
Speaker 5: around the chicken massacres that are going on because of
Speaker 5: H five and one. So I think that building community
Speaker 5: actively seeking out connections, physical connections, personal connections with the
Speaker 5: people around you, because that's one of the predicates is
Speaker 5: social isolation that enables this. And I, you know, I live.
Speaker 5: We used to call our sub stack who is Robert Malone?
Speaker 5: It was a reference to who is John Gould? In
Speaker 5: part because I kind of live on Gold's sculpture And
Speaker 5: if if I don't know if an rand is as
Speaker 5: popular in Canada as it is in the United States.
Speaker 5: But I think the pathway forward is to return to
Speaker 5: self reliance, and this was also a core part of
Speaker 5: Canadian culture historically, Canadians, you know the Monty Python joke,
Speaker 5: I am a lumberjack and I don't care, but there
Speaker 5: was a truth to that.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 5: Canadians are red green. Remember I could fix anything with
Speaker 5: duct tape. Canadians have a history of being rugged, individualists
Speaker 5: and self reliant. I think you need to reach back
Speaker 5: to that culture and to celebrate it and to try
Speaker 5: to rekindle it as much as possible. The idea of
Speaker 5: a decentralized world that Clinton Clint I think is probably
Speaker 5: strong advocate for it is the way we break the
Speaker 5: back of globalism is we return to self reliance and
Speaker 5: decentralization and this principle that decision should be made at
Speaker 5: the most local competent level. That was the core tenant
Speaker 5: behind the US Constitution. And I think there's still a
Speaker 5: lot of merit to that idea. So that I think
Speaker 5: how we free ourselves from this kind of globalist tyranny
Speaker 5: is reinvest or, recommit to community in too self reliance,
Speaker 5: and to productive labor, physical productive labor. The other day
Speaker 5: I heard a lecture from Mike Rowe at Seapack the
Speaker 5: dirty jobs.
Speaker 6: Guy.
Speaker 5: We have a deficit of millions and millions of jobs
Speaker 5: that are going unclaimed in the United States for people
Speaker 5: that actually work with their hands. And many of these jobs,
Speaker 5: like HVAC people are strong, six figure jobs. But we've
Speaker 5: celebrated the virtual life, we've celebrated the importance of the
Speaker 5: university education. We've demean people who actually work for a
Speaker 5: living and do things with their hands. But that is
Speaker 5: what made Canada strong, That's what made the United States strong.
Speaker 5: And if we want to free ourselves from the grip
Speaker 5: of these folks that you know, think of everything in
Speaker 5: terms of dollars and cents and economics and cash flow,
Speaker 5: et cetera. You want to free ourselves from their grip,
Speaker 5: you know, return to self reliance. That's my I'm countful
Speaker 5: love it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And as a homestead of that homeschools off grid,
Speaker 2: I couldn't agree with you more. And what we're seeing
Speaker 2: around here, yeah right out, brother. And what we see
Speaker 2: around here is they're even cracking down on chickens. They
Speaker 2: won't let you have more than four. So they've absolutely
Speaker 2: targeted exactly what you're saying, doctor Malone, because they know
Speaker 2: how much food a chicken can provide, so they're not
Speaker 2: even making it legal anymore. You can't even have more
Speaker 2: than four chickens. And this is Oh. They're also doing
Speaker 2: this with water, Clint, They're putting in smart meters actually
Speaker 2: shut off your water. Not just me eater it, you
Speaker 2: can actually shut off your water. So they're targeting water,
Speaker 2: you know exactly. But they're going after wells anywhere. Good,
Speaker 2: you're right, but they're going after wells even in rural areas.
Speaker 2: You have to register it or you could be charged. Now,
Speaker 2: you mentioned doctor Malone a rise of something, So Michael,
Speaker 2: let me ask you. JD. Vance one of his first
Speaker 2: speeches after becoming the vice president, he went to the
Speaker 2: AI Security summit and said, look, we need to focus
Speaker 2: on opportunity and not so much safety. And then that
Speaker 2: puts chills on my spine, Like I'm really for you know,
Speaker 2: trying to develop and understand things, but to take the
Speaker 2: safety rails off for the opportunity gave me a bit
Speaker 2: of a chill. Could this be the rise that maybe
Speaker 2: doctor Malone's talking about the rise of AI?
Speaker 3: You know, I was just on a long call two
Speaker 3: and a half hours and they talked about with some
Speaker 3: AI experts actually, and that's not my field, so I'm
Speaker 3: going to be very careful. I was saying much about
Speaker 3: that other than it's clearly it's coming our way and
Speaker 3: that it's not my field, So I'm just cautious. I
Speaker 3: had a friend that just was up in Memphis, just
Speaker 3: spent a week up there. Actually we were down in
Speaker 3: Panama researching here, and he headed up to that data
Speaker 3: center to research that. You know, the things that are
Speaker 3: going on with this are just enormous, but I don't
Speaker 3: understand them well enough to say much.
Speaker 2: No problem, but that's something we definitely have to keep
Speaker 2: an eye on because it seems to be a global
Speaker 2: initiative now, and I understand a lot of countries that
Speaker 2: we're worried about it. But if they continue to put
Speaker 2: safety rails on while the US and other countries are not,
Speaker 2: they're just going to fall behind. So I see a
Speaker 2: whole bunch of.
Speaker 4: It's clearly weaponizable.
Speaker 3: I mean I was talking with one AI guy recently
Speaker 3: and he was talking about how his system could, you know,
Speaker 3: basically take every book in the world, like the Library
Speaker 3: of Congress. Speaking of which the Library of Congress, I
Speaker 3: love their website, but it doesn't work anymore worth of crap.
Speaker 3: I mean, I you know, I used Library. I'm probably
Speaker 3: like one of their big users, you know.
Speaker 4: But it does.
Speaker 3: It's so this guy that's in the AI world, I said, listen,
Speaker 3: so you got all these gazillions of books in your AI.
Speaker 3: Can you make me a map of the Dairying Gap,
Speaker 3: of all the historical paths down there, and just kind
Speaker 3: of overlay them on each other, you know, like make
Speaker 3: a heat map, you know, something useful that I can
Speaker 3: actually use.
Speaker 4: He's like, no, we can't do that.
Speaker 3: I mean, I know that day is coming, but it
Speaker 3: doesn't seem to be there on making me a map
Speaker 3: for the dairy and Gap yet.
Speaker 1: Though unfortunately, I know, I know we're running out of time.
Speaker 1: I just want to since I rarely get to talk
Speaker 1: to this many Canadians. As I told you Jason, I
Speaker 1: probably only have a thousand, you know, consistent Canadian listeners
Speaker 1: on Liberty Lockdown. But I just want to implore you
Speaker 1: guys to, I mean, sure, maintain your kind spirits and
Speaker 1: your gentle spirits.
Speaker 2: I love it.
Speaker 1: It's like I'm not hating on you at all, but
Speaker 1: I will say this, these people are trying to and
Speaker 1: buy These people I mean, your politicians are trying to
Speaker 1: make it so you can't defend yourself, so you can't
Speaker 1: speak your mind, so that you can't feed yourself, so
Speaker 1: that you can't store wealth. They are trying to destroy you.
Speaker 1: At some point you have to recognize these people are
Speaker 1: in fact your existential enemies. Now, that doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: you have to just, you know, curse at them, and
Speaker 1: that's going to change everything. I'm just saying, there is
Speaker 1: a point at which you must stand up for yourselves,
Speaker 1: and you must do away with the kindness veneer and
Speaker 1: speak plainly and just let them know that this will
Speaker 1: not stand, and let your friends, your family, your neighbors
Speaker 1: know the same. I think that that is the primary
Speaker 1: thing that disturbed me so much about the lockdown era
Speaker 1: is that so few people were willing to just speak
Speaker 1: their mind because of the show I had. I had
Speaker 1: so many people reaching out to me saying, you're keeping
Speaker 1: me sane. You're keeping me sane because nobody in my
Speaker 1: life is talking like you are about how insane everything
Speaker 1: is right now, and how un American everything is, and
Speaker 1: how dangerous everything is. And I don't want these mandates
Speaker 1: and I don't want to take this job, and I
Speaker 1: don't want to do this and I don't want to
Speaker 1: do that, but they're not saying it in their day
Speaker 1: to day life. If you just speak your mind, you
Speaker 1: will find kindred spirits in this fight. And the more
Speaker 1: of us do that, the more our numbers seem real,
Speaker 1: and the more the people in power will have to relent.
Speaker 1: And I just I just cannot implore Canadians, particularly in
Speaker 1: this lane more because the Americans we still have a
Speaker 1: bit of a fuck you don't tell me what to
Speaker 1: do type of spirit. But I have not seen that so.
Speaker 4: Much Canadians of that real big.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you meet both, brother. I think that's why my
Speaker 1: podcast does well. But I just that is like the
Speaker 1: whole world needs it. I'm not just lecturing Canadians here.
Speaker 1: Everybody needs to start speaking their mind and just being
Speaker 1: honest with their loved ones. I think if we do
Speaker 1: that will be about halfway done with this fight.
Speaker 2: I think you're right about that. And courage is catagious.
Speaker 2: And as you saw in Canada, very Canadian of us
Speaker 2: to go ahead and protest right in the middle of
Speaker 2: winter in late January early February, the coldest time in Canada,
Speaker 2: and we went out there and did that. We still
Speaker 2: have Canadians in jail for that one. They were beaten.
Speaker 2: We had vets who were injured that were beaten. But
Speaker 2: Canadians are very resilient and I hope that they're hearing
Speaker 2: this message. But again, courage is courageous. Can you all
Speaker 2: please hold on. We're going to say goodbye to the
Speaker 2: public and go answer a couple of questions with our members. Wow,
Speaker 2: thank you all very much. That was an excellent episode
Speaker 2: and we've got a ton of questions, but we don't
Speaker 2: have a ton of time. So what we're gonna do
Speaker 2: is just try and get a couple of them to you,
Speaker 2: if you don't mind. So I don't know if my
Speaker 2: there we go? How many? How are they planning to
Speaker 2: use immigration? So there you go, Michael. Already people are
Speaker 2: wondering how is immigration mass immigration going to be used
Speaker 2: against US?
Speaker 4: Genocide? Straight up? I mean, use the right word.
Speaker 3: I saw a podcast today and they were talking about
Speaker 3: that quite a lot. I mean, words are atomic structures
Speaker 3: of truth and lies.
Speaker 4: Right. You have to.
Speaker 3: Start with accurate words or correct words, right, otherwise everything
Speaker 3: else you say will be false. You cannot make water
Speaker 3: out of like sulfur. And carbon you can maybe make
Speaker 3: I don't know something else you need hydrogen and oxtion, right.
Speaker 3: And uh, so you know when people call this migration
Speaker 3: or uh you know, unsponsored migration or something, it's an
Speaker 3: actual lie.
Speaker 4: It's a it's straight up. All else that follows is false.
Speaker 3: And it's very clear that these are being brought in
Speaker 3: to do genocide. Now, genocide has different faces. I was
Speaker 3: mentioning before, but I didn't finish the thought process.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 3: You know there's soft genocides where it's just to kind
Speaker 3: of push you out and they replace you. Right, So
Speaker 3: it's basically like one hermit shell taking another hermit shell's
Speaker 3: hermit crab shell. Right and uh and then there's you know,
Speaker 3: more firm This is what happened in Tibet. Those you
Speaker 3: know a lot of people were killed and so it
Speaker 3: was very kinetic. But they also let a lot of
Speaker 3: people just go because they really just wanted to bet.
Speaker 4: They didn't want to kill Tibetans. They wanted to bet.
Speaker 3: And and you're like doctor Malone was saying earlier, you know,
Speaker 3: they want to or I think it was doctor Malone
Speaker 3: that was saying it. They want you know, if you
Speaker 3: want the minerals, like you want to have a lower
Speaker 3: population density, right to take those minerals, and Tibet's got
Speaker 3: a lot of minerals also, the origin of the seven
Speaker 3: major rivers and that sort of thing, Right, I went
Speaker 3: up to Tibet to actually look many years ago. I
Speaker 3: don't think they'd let me in now. But in any case,
Speaker 3: that was kind of a firm genocide. And then there's
Speaker 3: the hard genocides where it's like who these versus tutsis?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: It was straight up trying to kill them all right,
Speaker 3: hunt them down to the edge of the of the
Speaker 3: land if they go away. But they weren't allowing any
Speaker 3: surrender or any any escape. If they could get you,
Speaker 3: they were just going to kill you, right, And I
Speaker 3: think that you're gonna get some combination of that, for instance,
Speaker 3: in Ireland and across Europe. Clearly this is I mean,
Speaker 3: you know, I saw President's speech the other day and
Speaker 3: he was talking about Lake and Riley. Right, Lake and
Speaker 3: Riley was murdered by a guy named jose Et Bar.
Speaker 3: You know, for those who followed my work in this migration,
Speaker 3: you know these invasion issues. You know that I've spent
Speaker 3: a great deal of time in the jungles of the
Speaker 3: Darien Gap. And I've seen an absolute huge amount of
Speaker 3: people come in. We know at least over a million
Speaker 3: people came in because I have records of those. My
Speaker 3: mastmate is that maybe one point four million I think
Speaker 3: is pretty probably pretty accurate between Biden's time and Biden's time,
Speaker 3: about one point four million. Uh and and and and
Speaker 3: I can support more than one million of those. UH
Speaker 3: support that the numbers accurate. But I Barra, the guy
Speaker 3: that murdered uh Lake and Riley, he came through. I
Speaker 3: found him in the records as soon as I saw
Speaker 3: Trump speaking, I found him immediately. And his two brothers,
Speaker 3: who were also criminals, they also came through the Darien Gap.
Speaker 3: They came through later, and they came on the same bus.
Speaker 3: I know which bus they left on, right. So Jose
Speaker 3: came in with no his Jose Abara, he came in
Speaker 3: with no no documents. He didn't he didn't show any documents.
Speaker 3: And then his brothers came in later months later and
Speaker 3: they uh and they they did show their documents, and
Speaker 3: then they got on a bus, the same bus together,
Speaker 3: and then they all ended up being arrested in the
Speaker 3: United States. One of them for a capital crime for
Speaker 3: which he's now spending life in prison. This is happening
Speaker 3: every day now, every single day, people are being raped
Speaker 3: and murdered for people that came through the dairy and gap.
Speaker 3: I mean, these are you know, this is going to
Speaker 3: be a pretty serious We're going to go into a
Speaker 3: war and it's going to be very intense. You know,
Speaker 3: I've spent years and wars. I've studied wars quite a lot,
Speaker 3: and I can see. That's why I returned to the
Speaker 3: United States in twenty twenty from Asia. I just spent
Speaker 3: about nineteen years in Asia, all the wars and all
Speaker 3: that stuff. But I realized that the conditions were accruing
Speaker 3: for civil war in the United States. So I returned
Speaker 3: at the end of twenty twenty and immediately went to
Speaker 3: Portland and watched the Antifa clowns doing their stuff. And
Speaker 3: I was there at January sixth and the whole works right,
Speaker 3: seen all these things in Atlanta and all over the place,
Speaker 3: and it's very clear that we're a war is being
Speaker 3: brought to us and its sponsored.
Speaker 2: Now, Lisa. I know in Alberta, the immigration problem here
Speaker 2: has caused the job market issue, and as Ontario is
Speaker 2: one of the capitals for automotive manufacturing. But this trade war,
Speaker 2: there's going to be a lot of issues around that.
Speaker 2: So what is it going to look like for you
Speaker 2: and your constituents when those kind of jobs deteriorate and
Speaker 2: they're gone. The job market's already saturated, and the subsidy
Speaker 2: of immigrants versus Canadians when it comes to salary is
Speaker 2: going to be very difficult for Canadians to find any work.
Speaker 2: Are you concerned about that in Ontario?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 6: Yeah, we're concerned about it huge here. I mean, we're
Speaker 6: having a hard time right now. A lot of people
Speaker 6: are having a hard time finding jobs as it is
Speaker 6: right now because they there's no they're giving the incentives
Speaker 6: and bringing in the immigrants, the illegal immigrants to take
Speaker 6: these jobs, and they're giving the businesses incentives to hire
Speaker 6: immigrants over born and raised Canadians here right now. So
Speaker 6: we're there's a big problem right now. I'm getting tons
Speaker 6: and tons of messages from people saying, hey, counsel, They're like,
Speaker 6: you know, can you help me find a job? And
Speaker 6: I mean, my hands are tied at that point. There's
Speaker 6: nothing that I can do to help them get a job.
Speaker 6: So it's getting very difficult over here right now.
Speaker 2: Now, Clint, you're going to find this mind blowing and
Speaker 2: doctor Malone as well. So one of the responses that's
Speaker 2: already been talked about in January with the opposition leader
Speaker 2: jug Meet saying and Mark Karney when he was just
Speaker 2: becoming the candidate for leadership and now he was selected
Speaker 2: just a couple of days ago, they were talking about
Speaker 2: a nine hundred billion dollar plan and they're calling it
Speaker 2: a relief package for workers for this the response to
Speaker 2: the trade war. Now we're already one point three to
Speaker 2: one point four or something in trillion in debt. It's
Speaker 2: small numbers compared to what you guys got, But what
Speaker 2: will that do to inflation? If we pump another nine
Speaker 2: hundred billion of printed money from Carney into our economy.
Speaker 1: It'll be extraordinary. I mean the just for perspective on this,
Speaker 1: the two thousand and eight real estate collapse in America,
Speaker 1: the full bailout, which saved not just American banks but
Speaker 1: many foreign banks as well, was eight hundred billion. So
Speaker 1: you guys are talking about for the Canadian economy, which
Speaker 1: is a fraction of the size of the American economy,
Speaker 1: taking nine hundred billion dollar bailout package that is going
Speaker 1: to destroy you guys.
Speaker 2: In all fairness, it's nine hundred Canadian billion, so not
Speaker 2: as bad, but in case, it's definitely.
Speaker 1: Still a hell of a lot of money.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, right now, seventy cents if we're lucky.
Speaker 2: Yeah, something like that. Now, doctor Malone, what is that
Speaker 2: going to do with families and the psychology of people
Speaker 2: if they're unemployed and they're having to fight with immigrants
Speaker 2: and that are illegal taking the job like you, a
Speaker 2: young person in Canada has no chance of finding a
Speaker 2: job right now.
Speaker 5: I'm so I think the answer is self evident, but
Speaker 5: I'm struck by the parallels between what you're describing and
Speaker 5: what I've seen, you know, with my own eyes happening
Speaker 5: in Ireland. Once a nation state accepts this level of
Speaker 5: indebtedness and it becomes totally dependent on whomever is able
Speaker 5: to manage that debt, control that debt, and in the
Speaker 5: case of of Ireland, you ended up with the Irish
Speaker 5: being completely beholdened to the European Union and the big
Speaker 5: financial powers but behind the EU that are then able
Speaker 5: to dictate Irish policy and among other things, for instance,
Speaker 5: dictator the acceptance of Ukrainians, this great wave of Ukrainian
Speaker 5: influx that's come into Ireland and really swamp the native population.
Speaker 5: So what you're doing by accepting you collectively, by accepting
Speaker 5: this capital, is your mortgaging your future. And you're mortgaging
Speaker 5: the future of those children and those families, And you're
Speaker 5: putting yourself in a position where you functionally will be
Speaker 5: an indentured servant and you really won't have any choice
Speaker 5: about it. And there's a lot of as probably many
Speaker 5: of you are aware, there's a lot of movement of
Speaker 5: foot to try to commoditize a variety of natural resources
Speaker 5: all the way through to things like air and water.
Speaker 5: And unfortunately, mister Trump seems to be playing into this
Speaker 5: when he talks about the American balance sheet. What he's
Speaker 5: doing is he's basically building the justification that federal lands
Speaker 5: have X value and so that can be leveraged to
Speaker 5: UH sustain additional debt UH and UH and to justify
Speaker 5: the debt that we have right now. So what what
Speaker 5: you're doing is creating a situation in which eventually, UH,
Speaker 5: the legacy of the Canadian people in terms of particular
Speaker 5: public lands are going to be mortgaged off to those
Speaker 5: entities that are holding the notes that your government is
Speaker 5: going to be offering in order to support this debt.
Speaker 5: So that's what what you're doing is is in you know,
Speaker 5: in in order to avoid the hard times or in
Speaker 5: order to enable these social policies. Getting back to a
Speaker 5: Austrians goal frame of reference, you're mortgaging your future. And
Speaker 5: it's it's really quite explicit, and it will come in
Speaker 5: the form of political control and social control as well
Speaker 5: as financial controls that you'll be then subjected to. And
Speaker 5: you're gonna it's a noose around your neck. Uh and
Speaker 5: and it's going to be very hard to get that
Speaker 5: new saws.
Speaker 2: And yeah, and it goes back to resources. Second, and
Speaker 2: it goes back to resources like we saw in Greece
Speaker 2: when they you're using international monetary funds, they got behind,
Speaker 2: they had the default and guess what happened. The international
Speaker 2: monitory funds start to dictate their resources, their future labor
Speaker 2: and even the taxation. And I believe Mark Karney is
Speaker 2: part of that group. He's part of that that and
Speaker 2: that's exactly what we're looking at here, globalist chains through
Speaker 2: debt to our future development. And that's what they're locking
Speaker 2: us into. So it comes right back to resources again.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this is.
Speaker 1: All I have, IMF World Bank h confessions of an
Speaker 1: economic hitman. This is exactly what's happening. But I just
Speaker 1: wanted to piggyback off of doctor Malone's point and say
Speaker 1: that what we've witnessed in Europe broadly is this great
Speaker 1: replacement theory writ large via the United Nations and you know,
Speaker 1: in GEO framework and also through the US's military industrial
Speaker 1: complex and the complete demolition of the Middle East, and
Speaker 1: then all of these refugees that need somewhere to go,
Speaker 1: and then they all flooded into Europe. Well as a consequence,
Speaker 1: like they are much more, much further down the destructive
Speaker 1: path than the United States in terms of those immigrants
Speaker 1: already having been there, already having taken some of the
Speaker 1: menial jobs and leaving the domestic population kind of rudderless
Speaker 1: and you know, discontented, rightfully. So, so my vantage point
Speaker 1: on this is that this is why Europe in particular
Speaker 1: has been pushing so hard to turn the proxy war
Speaker 1: against Russia and Ukraine into a hot war between NATO
Speaker 1: and the US, because NATO and Russia, even though Trump
Speaker 1: has signaled that he wants the fuck out of there,
Speaker 1: and God blas and for it, and I hope we
Speaker 1: get out of there, But it does seem as if
Speaker 1: like they're now proposing an eight hundred billion dollar package
Speaker 1: of their own to try and continue this war and
Speaker 1: potentially putting European troops inside of Ukraine. I really do
Speaker 1: think that the powers that be recognized. I mean, these
Speaker 1: people are they're evil, but they're not idiots, right like
Speaker 1: they understand that once you have a huge swath of
Speaker 1: your population that has no capacity to get on the
Speaker 1: economic ladder, it's either civil war or you send them
Speaker 1: to war. And I think that's the decision or the
Speaker 1: inflection point that we're at. Will we be propagandized into
Speaker 1: having a conventional war against the largest nuclear power on
Speaker 1: Earth and Russian which case all of humanity is that
Speaker 1: is jeopardized? Or can we avoid that? And I don't
Speaker 1: know what the answer is. There's potential peace negotiations and
Speaker 1: a ceasefire that's all proposed today and God willing that happens.
Speaker 1: But if it doesn't, we're in a lot of trouble.
Speaker 1: And I don't think it's an accident. I think that
Speaker 1: these people are making this calculation.
Speaker 2: And Michael, final question and I think will be to
Speaker 2: you is Christia Freeland and Mark Karney were the two
Speaker 2: front runners for the Liberal Party leadership. But what a
Speaker 2: lot of people doesn't don't know is Christia Freeland's child,
Speaker 2: one of them godfather is Mark Varney. So they have
Speaker 2: a long relationship. They were not really running against each other,
Speaker 2: and they're both definitelyf aligned. And what Christipher Freeland was
Speaker 2: saying during her leadership race is Canada needs to cooperate
Speaker 2: and work with our nuclear enabled partners in order to
Speaker 2: protect ourselves as part of this, what would happen to
Speaker 2: Canada if we start nuking up our border as a
Speaker 2: response to the US.
Speaker 4: Canada getting nuclear weapons?
Speaker 2: Is that what you're saying, Yeah, that's one of our
Speaker 2: Christia Freeland is talking about working with our nuclear partners
Speaker 2: in order to have more protection that way.
Speaker 3: I think what you're talking about is actually China getting
Speaker 3: nuclear weapons in Canada. I mean, I'm being realistic about
Speaker 3: this about who is really running that show.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: China is clearly taking over and they're fighting between India
Speaker 3: to take Canada.
Speaker 4: That's clear.
Speaker 3: And then the United States is in this three way
Speaker 3: fight as well. I mean, you you're a Canadian, I'm
Speaker 3: sure you've been across Canada and you see the demographic
Speaker 3: shifts that are coming there. You know, China is something
Speaker 3: I studied every day. I've been to China, spent a
Speaker 3: lot of time in China and around China, and I'm
Speaker 3: quite familiar with what's going on here. I've written three
Speaker 3: books on Chinese information war. Unfortunately they're only in Japanese
Speaker 3: language or not in English.
Speaker 4: But the point is is.
Speaker 3: They're taking over Canada and we just found I just
Speaker 3: had about one hundred Chinese passports checked of people that
Speaker 3: came through the Dairying Gap, and not a single one
Speaker 3: of them as in the Chinese system right where these
Speaker 3: passports coming from there.
Speaker 4: I mean, who are these people?
Speaker 3: We've met people coming into the dairying Gap that almost
Speaker 3: certainly are MSS Ministry of State Security, which is Chinese CIA, right,
Speaker 3: almost certainly, and one.
Speaker 4: Of them we were able to actually track back.
Speaker 3: So I mean, and these guys are coming hard all
Speaker 3: over the place, whether it's Netherlands, whether it's Japan.
Speaker 4: Japan too.
Speaker 3: People keep saying that Japan would never do it, and
Speaker 3: I'm like, obviously, you don't.
Speaker 4: Know what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: I spend a lot of time in Japan, right, and
Speaker 3: I'll be there again soon, and it is being invaded
Speaker 3: by the same characters. And China is clearly like before
Speaker 3: the COVID thing, Chinese investors bought a bunch of Chinese
Speaker 3: bought a bunch of Japanese crematoria, right, coincidentally, right on time,
Speaker 3: you know, probably a coincidence. But I mean, so there's
Speaker 3: more going on here than meets the eye. There's a
Speaker 3: lot more. And as you can see, these puppeteers who
Speaker 3: are nominally the heads of state or the let's say,
Speaker 3: the puppets who are nominally the heads of state, you know,
Speaker 3: like Trudeau and these others, they're just condoms. They're there
Speaker 3: to be replaced and they are they are as soon
Speaker 3: as they're used up, they're going to be thrown out,
Speaker 3: and uh and and and and then the next one
Speaker 3: will come because you know, they they they you know,
Speaker 3: at some point they become useless and then they'll be replaced.
Speaker 1: And Michael is there is the reason Trump has been
Speaker 1: increasingly antagonistic with Canada because of what you're describing, that
Speaker 1: he recognizes that so much of their political establishment is
Speaker 1: basically being puppeted by the Chinese. Is that is that
Speaker 1: play into this at all?
Speaker 3: I think now this despite that I communicate constantly with
Speaker 3: Trump people very close to Trump, UH, and I've attacked
Speaker 3: Trump consistently from the beginning. Newt Gingridge called me up
Speaker 3: before the first election when it was Trump versus I mean, yeah,
Speaker 3: Trump versus Clinton. I was like, well, thank you for
Speaker 3: calling me up, sir. How'd you get my number?
Speaker 4: I was at my office in Thailand at the time.
Speaker 3: He was trying to rummage up support for UH, for Trump,
Speaker 3: and I'm like, I don't trust Trump.
Speaker 4: This So this is back before the first election. I'm
Speaker 4: not going to vote for a Clinton.
Speaker 3: There's no chance of that. But again, don't you have
Speaker 3: somebody else? Now, keep in mind, I've been watching our
Speaker 3: state department around the world destroy our relations with other countries.
Speaker 3: In Thailand, if you look up my name and ambassador
Speaker 3: to Thailand, her name was Christy Kenny, you'll see the
Speaker 3: epic fights we were having in Thailand in twenty fourteen.
Speaker 3: She was clearly trying to sabotage or vital relations with Thailand.
Speaker 3: Right and then likewise similar happened over in Japan. I
Speaker 3: see this all over the world. It's happened here in
Speaker 3: Panama as well. The ambassador of pumpthing, I see our
Speaker 3: State Department all, I mean, just everywhere, just throwing acid
Speaker 3: on very long lasting relates. We've had great up I'll
Speaker 3: let you go, but we've had great relations with I
Speaker 3: see Trump destroying our relations. He's a continuation of that.
Speaker 3: I see, you know, I see I see him doing that.
Speaker 3: That's what he's doing.
Speaker 4: In my view, that's what he's doing. I don't know
Speaker 4: what he's thinking.