WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.760 --> 00:00:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Jamie, could you make me I express?

2
00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So okay, we're gonna open it up. Let's keep it

3
00:00:08.279 --> 00:00:08.919
<v Speaker 2>on topic.

4
00:00:09.720 --> 00:00:15.000
<v Speaker 3>One plus one plus one equal free icons are Ideala, Tree, Jay,

5
00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:16.960
<v Speaker 3>j but Jay, can I talk?

6
00:00:17.480 --> 00:00:18.120
<v Speaker 2>But it wasn't.

7
00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Next, cathod draf God is real?

8
00:00:20.559 --> 00:00:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Wife?

9
00:00:20.760 --> 00:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Does he allow evil? Why do you pray to dead people?

10
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Traditions of men? It's a no brainer. You're such a

11
00:00:27.800 --> 00:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>tyrannical rainer.

12
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:36.399
<v Speaker 3>Is this your first.

13
00:00:36.119 --> 00:00:38.399
<v Speaker 5>Time on the in or wesh?

14
00:00:39.039 --> 00:00:41.799
<v Speaker 6>I need a changer, Joe can't think of.

15
00:00:41.679 --> 00:00:43.359
<v Speaker 1>These loads your slow boys?

16
00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Is this your first time on the in or wesh?

17
00:00:48.920 --> 00:00:49.840
<v Speaker 4>I need to changer?

18
00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:50.359
<v Speaker 7>Joe?

19
00:00:50.840 --> 00:00:52.479
<v Speaker 6>Was that an uncreative foot part?

20
00:00:53.240 --> 00:00:54.079
<v Speaker 2>Unmute, dude?

21
00:00:54.520 --> 00:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Stop repeating my name?

22
00:00:56.079 --> 00:00:56.399
<v Speaker 4>Dude?

23
00:00:56.520 --> 00:01:00.119
<v Speaker 2>You Goober's callin or I'll boot you. Where did you

24
00:01:00.200 --> 00:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>get the Bible from? Have you read the Canons of Franzia?

25
00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:05.519
<v Speaker 7>What are you Catholic?

26
00:01:05.799 --> 00:01:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Are you promisants?

27
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to be mean, but do you have

28
00:01:09.079 --> 00:01:10.439
<v Speaker 3>an actual argument?

29
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>There is only one church? You are in a cult.

30
00:01:13.799 --> 00:01:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You're a goblin, a demon, a boomer?

31
00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:18.879
<v Speaker 4>Quick question?

32
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any diddyback venerators in the chat?

33
00:01:23.560 --> 00:01:26.079
<v Speaker 2>How is this your first time on.

34
00:01:26.239 --> 00:01:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Being or well, I need a chance take it these loads?

35
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:32.879
<v Speaker 7>You're slow boys?

36
00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you?

37
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Is this your first time momby wes?

38
00:01:38.480 --> 00:01:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I need a If you're a wine on front of

39
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the line.

40
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm mute, dude, what is your epistemic justification?

41
00:01:55.799 --> 00:01:58.519
<v Speaker 8>That argument is circular and you are refuted.

42
00:02:00.439 --> 00:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Is this your first time on me? Or where shay

43
00:02:04.640 --> 00:02:07.519
<v Speaker 3>I need a show? Can't take these littles.

44
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You're snow boying. Is this your first time on me?

45
00:02:12.719 --> 00:02:16.639
<v Speaker 3>Or where I need to change your show? If you're

46
00:02:16.680 --> 00:02:18.639
<v Speaker 3>a lie in front of the lie.

47
00:02:18.719 --> 00:02:49.120
<v Speaker 9>On mute, dude, it's that time to get you're freaking

48
00:02:49.240 --> 00:02:52.479
<v Speaker 9>Oh wait, that's the wrong time. That's not this time?

49
00:02:53.159 --> 00:02:53.680
<v Speaker 9>Is this time?

50
00:02:59.199 --> 00:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So where do we get the Bible from? Did you

51
00:03:02.919 --> 00:03:07.439
<v Speaker 1>even read the cannons? There is only one charge. You

52
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are in an occult.

53
00:03:09.199 --> 00:03:12.159
<v Speaker 10>You're a gobbling a demon, a bull merchard.

54
00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:13.080
<v Speaker 7>You saw me?

55
00:03:13.840 --> 00:03:14.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm your dude?

56
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:19.439
<v Speaker 6>Is this your personal webs?

57
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:22.599
<v Speaker 2>I need a gender jew can't take it.

58
00:03:22.919 --> 00:03:23.800
<v Speaker 4>He's little to your.

59
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 6>Boys on your dude, I want us one plus one

60
00:03:29.319 --> 00:03:30.280
<v Speaker 6>equal free.

61
00:03:31.639 --> 00:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It comes out the dollar tree.

62
00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:35.800
<v Speaker 11>Why do you pray?

63
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Eat the dead people?

64
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:49.840
<v Speaker 6>The traditions madden you? Heretic on your fude, is this

65
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:52.800
<v Speaker 6>your per webs shack.

66
00:03:53.840 --> 00:03:56.439
<v Speaker 7>I need a gender jew can't take it.

67
00:03:56.759 --> 00:03:57.599
<v Speaker 4>He's little to your.

68
00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Boys, I'm your dude.

69
00:04:02.439 --> 00:04:04.120
<v Speaker 4>What's your pistemic justification?

70
00:04:05.280 --> 00:04:07.000
<v Speaker 9>Welcome in circular.

71
00:04:14.759 --> 00:04:36.639
<v Speaker 4>To Jamie.

72
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>At the monkey. You find off in that.

73
00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:52.879
<v Speaker 9>What you're doing up there? Why you scared?

74
00:04:53.639 --> 00:04:55.879
<v Speaker 11>Why you run it roun.

75
00:04:55.879 --> 00:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Themy bab.

76
00:04:59.079 --> 00:05:02.800
<v Speaker 12>You ran my manto and from me?

77
00:05:07.879 --> 00:05:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Then till the monkey.

78
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Like the female monkeys.

79
00:05:15.639 --> 00:05:20.199
<v Speaker 5>With the bananas between the trees, hanging.

80
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:36.959
<v Speaker 6>Down upside down, that's a smile. SI, tell the monkey

81
00:05:37.279 --> 00:05:38.639
<v Speaker 6>what you doing to me?

82
00:05:39.480 --> 00:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Till it to a monkey, till a mallcky.

83
00:06:12.319 --> 00:06:28.560
<v Speaker 9>Isn't this the trump downs? What's due to me?

84
00:06:41.439 --> 00:06:42.079
<v Speaker 4>That's true?

85
00:06:43.759 --> 00:06:47.319
<v Speaker 9>The road takes you. Chevy is ready to dar No,

86
00:06:49.160 --> 00:06:55.519
<v Speaker 9>can't let advertisements ruined the beauty. Welcome everybody. It's that time.

87
00:06:56.519 --> 00:07:01.240
<v Speaker 9>It's that time to get down and Sneezy. We're talking

88
00:07:01.240 --> 00:07:09.360
<v Speaker 9>about all of the dang seven Dwarfs. Sneezy Snorty y'all,

89
00:07:09.519 --> 00:07:11.839
<v Speaker 9>y'all know about Snorty the dwarf. He was over there

90
00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:16.879
<v Speaker 9>doing a little of that cocaine. Little little snorty dwarf,

91
00:07:19.319 --> 00:07:24.879
<v Speaker 9>like the O Bonn says, there was skanky. He was

92
00:07:24.959 --> 00:07:29.480
<v Speaker 9>one of the Dwarfs. He was a nasty, just trashy kid,

93
00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:32.480
<v Speaker 9>grew up in a trailer, drew up, he grew up

94
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:35.439
<v Speaker 9>in a living in out of a bus, and then

95
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:39.680
<v Speaker 9>got recruited into the Dwarf. In the Dwarf. Ops, that

96
00:07:39.959 --> 00:07:44.879
<v Speaker 9>was Skanky the Dwarf. There was Snorty, Sneezy Snorty was

97
00:07:44.879 --> 00:07:49.720
<v Speaker 9>all about cocaine. Skanky slutty the Dwarf. He was all

98
00:07:49.759 --> 00:07:58.519
<v Speaker 9>about hoeing around town. So the allergies are turned up

99
00:07:58.560 --> 00:08:00.759
<v Speaker 9>to eleven. I'm sorry, but you know, it's just how

100
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:07.759
<v Speaker 9>it is living down here in Cuba, down here with

101
00:08:07.879 --> 00:08:14.639
<v Speaker 9>Operation Mongoose, Operation Mongoose of the CIA's y'all heard of that.

102
00:08:16.600 --> 00:08:20.519
<v Speaker 9>Welcome everybody, It's open for him today. I wanted to

103
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:23.560
<v Speaker 9>try to try a different title. We'll see what happens.

104
00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:29.720
<v Speaker 9>Protestantism is false. Prove me wrong, like like Steve Crowder

105
00:08:29.879 --> 00:08:33.480
<v Speaker 9>style where you got to prove me wrong, Jay finally

106
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:36.440
<v Speaker 9>lost it. I don't want people like I do the

107
00:08:36.559 --> 00:08:39.240
<v Speaker 9>same nonsense every time I'm sitting in front of this

108
00:08:39.399 --> 00:08:43.000
<v Speaker 9>computer screen, every time I'm lobstream, and it's the same nonsense.

109
00:08:43.759 --> 00:08:45.600
<v Speaker 9>You would think you guys would know it by now.

110
00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:51.240
<v Speaker 9>H Brosey ten dollars. Have you seen what rid von

111
00:08:51.320 --> 00:08:54.000
<v Speaker 9>AP's been posting? Yeah, I just DMed him. I DMed

112
00:08:54.080 --> 00:08:56.639
<v Speaker 9>him the other day. I mean, I don't know what

113
00:08:57.399 --> 00:09:01.200
<v Speaker 9>to say. I mean, what do you want me to do?

114
00:09:01.559 --> 00:09:04.440
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I've offered to debate. I've offered to discuss

115
00:09:04.480 --> 00:09:11.679
<v Speaker 9>the topics. I mean, anybody who wants to learn or

116
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:15.519
<v Speaker 9>whatever could always hop on these streams. Is very easy

117
00:09:15.600 --> 00:09:17.759
<v Speaker 9>to do. They can come over here if they want to.

118
00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:23.320
<v Speaker 9>When you got a debate, Pastor Randy Balls bread in

119
00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:27.519
<v Speaker 9>ten dollars, that's one debate. I am scared of. People say, who,

120
00:09:27.720 --> 00:09:29.240
<v Speaker 9>why are you scared of debate? So and so I'm

121
00:09:29.279 --> 00:09:32.000
<v Speaker 9>not scared of debate anybody except for Pastor Randy Balls.

122
00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:36.799
<v Speaker 9>Rozie says. I understand he's new, everybody has baggage, but

123
00:09:37.000 --> 00:09:39.759
<v Speaker 9>he sounded like a subverter. To be honest, he needs

124
00:09:39.840 --> 00:09:43.200
<v Speaker 9>to be checked. I mean, if he keeps pushing you know,

125
00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:46.399
<v Speaker 9>LPTA for us and that kind of stuff, then yeah,

126
00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:55.799
<v Speaker 9>I mean it's unfortunate, but we'll see Kyle Kosha twenty bucks. Respectfully,

127
00:09:55.840 --> 00:10:00.919
<v Speaker 9>how is Christianity the One True Faith? Which brand of Christianity? Well,

128
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:05.799
<v Speaker 9>I mean the fact that people disagree doesn't prove or

129
00:10:05.879 --> 00:10:13.840
<v Speaker 9>disprove anything. Every position out there is going to have

130
00:10:13.919 --> 00:10:17.399
<v Speaker 9>people within it or adjacent to it that disagree with it.

131
00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:23.000
<v Speaker 9>But people mistake disagreements and debate, with the truth itself

132
00:10:23.159 --> 00:10:29.600
<v Speaker 9>being unknowable. Which brand of Christianity is a correct one? Well,

133
00:10:29.639 --> 00:10:31.759
<v Speaker 9>you're going to have to spend some time and learn

134
00:10:31.799 --> 00:10:35.600
<v Speaker 9>about it, because there's no other way really to deal

135
00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:40.399
<v Speaker 9>with the competing claims. But just because there's competing claims

136
00:10:41.080 --> 00:10:45.080
<v Speaker 9>doesn't invalidate the system itself. Otherwise every system would be

137
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:49.919
<v Speaker 9>invalidated because everybody has competing claims. How can I If

138
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:52.200
<v Speaker 9>I can't trust mainstream media, why would I trust two

139
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:56.039
<v Speaker 9>thousand year old texts? Well, that's a false equivalence. The

140
00:10:56.120 --> 00:10:59.919
<v Speaker 9>fact that something old doesn't necessarily mean it's true or false.

141
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:08.279
<v Speaker 9>But mainstream media has a repeated record of being demonstrably false,

142
00:11:08.960 --> 00:11:12.720
<v Speaker 9>So I would just say those are false equivalences. But again,

143
00:11:13.759 --> 00:11:16.720
<v Speaker 9>I make the argument, if you're a skeptic, skepticism is

144
00:11:16.759 --> 00:11:20.080
<v Speaker 9>self refuting, all right, And if that's self refuting, then

145
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:23.720
<v Speaker 9>what are the options for non skeptical positions? And that's

146
00:11:23.759 --> 00:11:27.399
<v Speaker 9>what moves us into tags, what moves us into arguments

147
00:11:27.440 --> 00:11:31.080
<v Speaker 9>for the positions that we have. So if there's a

148
00:11:31.159 --> 00:11:36.279
<v Speaker 9>better position, then somebody needs to come argue those positions.

149
00:11:37.519 --> 00:11:39.759
<v Speaker 9>But Kyle, you're welcome to call in. It's open for him.

150
00:11:40.399 --> 00:11:43.320
<v Speaker 9>We got already about five or six people in line.

151
00:11:44.200 --> 00:11:47.960
<v Speaker 9>The link is in the chat. It's also in the

152
00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:52.759
<v Speaker 9>show description. You can call in to debate or ask

153
00:11:52.919 --> 00:11:59.000
<v Speaker 9>questions right here. Today. I thought I saw gigantic Protestant

154
00:11:59.039 --> 00:12:04.879
<v Speaker 9>profiles everywhere and just mega followings of Protestant thought leaders

155
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:07.879
<v Speaker 9>or whatever they are. So I thought, you know, we

156
00:12:07.960 --> 00:12:11.639
<v Speaker 9>spent so much time debating Roman Catholics and Romanclachs are

157
00:12:11.639 --> 00:12:14.559
<v Speaker 9>welcome calling today too. I don't care. So it's still

158
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:17.919
<v Speaker 9>somewhat open. But I'm just trying out a different headline,

159
00:12:17.960 --> 00:12:20.639
<v Speaker 9>a different title to refute. See if you can get

160
00:12:20.639 --> 00:12:24.559
<v Speaker 9>some of these Protestants in here, because multiple Protestants have

161
00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:29.759
<v Speaker 9>made videos about me this week. So JW two dollars

162
00:12:29.879 --> 00:12:32.879
<v Speaker 9>debate n JF on the role of geopolitics in the Vatican.

163
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I heard a clip of him the other

164
00:12:35.200 --> 00:12:41.639
<v Speaker 9>day admitting that the geopolitical elements have subverted the Catholic Church,

165
00:12:41.840 --> 00:12:45.960
<v Speaker 9>so it's difficult to defend it is what he said.

166
00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:47.960
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if he's an old clipper or a

167
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:51.200
<v Speaker 9>new clip or what. But I don't know that he

168
00:12:51.240 --> 00:12:55.279
<v Speaker 9>wants to have that debate. J Man ten dollars, have

169
00:12:55.360 --> 00:12:59.600
<v Speaker 9>a blessed lint. Keep fighting. Thank you, Jordaane Jordaan ten Bucks.

170
00:13:01.080 --> 00:13:05.279
<v Speaker 9>You must forsake Yakubian punctuality. Yet today I was on

171
00:13:05.399 --> 00:13:09.679
<v Speaker 9>time and punctual. But that's because of yakub Warpick Gaming.

172
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:12.639
<v Speaker 9>Shout out to Warpick Gaming. He hopped in here, became

173
00:13:12.679 --> 00:13:16.600
<v Speaker 9>a member. Remember, you can become a member through YouTube

174
00:13:16.679 --> 00:13:18.720
<v Speaker 9>or through the website as well. You can go to

175
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:21.559
<v Speaker 9>the Jaysonnalysis website and sign up. Become a member, get

176
00:13:21.639 --> 00:13:27.200
<v Speaker 9>access to all the last ten years of archived lectures, talks, podcasts, interviews,

177
00:13:27.759 --> 00:13:33.720
<v Speaker 9>book reviews, deep geopolitical conspiratorial true conspiratorial analysis where we

178
00:13:33.799 --> 00:13:39.240
<v Speaker 9>go into espionage and the real that's real conspiracy, right conspiracy.

179
00:13:39.320 --> 00:13:44.919
<v Speaker 9>That's all this like cornball shit like Tartaria and stuff

180
00:13:44.919 --> 00:13:50.000
<v Speaker 9>like that. That's that's fake stuff. Real conspiracy is James

181
00:13:50.080 --> 00:13:54.000
<v Speaker 9>Jesus Angleton and backdoor channels to foreign nations and JFK.

182
00:13:54.279 --> 00:14:00.919
<v Speaker 9>That's real conspiracy. Austin Austin Kyle Bucks, thank you, for

183
00:14:00.960 --> 00:14:02.679
<v Speaker 9>all your content, Jay, you help me find in the

184
00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:06.120
<v Speaker 9>way to the orthoxy. Appreciate that, dude, Zach fifteen dollars,

185
00:14:06.159 --> 00:14:08.399
<v Speaker 9>I appreciate all your work. Are we going to get

186
00:14:08.440 --> 00:14:11.840
<v Speaker 9>a Sam Shumun discussion anytime soon? I don't know.

187
00:14:12.039 --> 00:14:12.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean.

188
00:14:14.200 --> 00:14:21.480
<v Speaker 9>Again, we're still discussing the possibility of doing rival presentations

189
00:14:21.559 --> 00:14:27.200
<v Speaker 9>on Sam's channel between me and Albrecht, So I don't

190
00:14:27.200 --> 00:14:28.799
<v Speaker 9>know if that's gonna happen or when that's going to happen,

191
00:14:28.879 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 9>but it's always they're the possibilities there. Nikki d what's up?

192
00:14:33.279 --> 00:14:33.399
<v Speaker 4>Man?

193
00:14:40.799 --> 00:14:43.080
<v Speaker 9>If you guys would hit like and share, what's up?

194
00:14:43.159 --> 00:14:46.200
<v Speaker 9>Nikki dep I'm you, hey, Jake.

195
00:14:47.039 --> 00:14:50.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I just want to say that that the status

196
00:14:50.159 --> 00:14:58.000
<v Speaker 7>quo that Protestants enable is perfection. What I just want

197
00:14:58.039 --> 00:15:00.799
<v Speaker 7>to say, the status quo Protestants enable is perfection.

198
00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:04.480
<v Speaker 9>You know that what does that matter? What does that mean?

199
00:15:04.879 --> 00:15:06.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I mean whole.

200
00:15:06.240 --> 00:15:10.200
<v Speaker 13>White like snow white, whole white and the seven Blood

201
00:15:10.360 --> 00:15:16.440
<v Speaker 13>Diamond Dwarfs like the Protestants by their Salvationist theology, you know,

202
00:15:16.559 --> 00:15:19.960
<v Speaker 13>they they are in denial that a problem exists and

203
00:15:20.120 --> 00:15:23.240
<v Speaker 13>they can just ask for forgiveness on their deathbat about it.

204
00:15:23.399 --> 00:15:23.559
<v Speaker 14>You know.

205
00:15:26.879 --> 00:15:32.559
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's a difficulty because there's not really a change

206
00:15:32.799 --> 00:15:46.200
<v Speaker 9>that's required in the person ocean apg man, what's up, good,

207
00:15:46.279 --> 00:15:53.679
<v Speaker 9>I'm you? Oh wait hello, hey, right, sorry, quick question.

208
00:15:54.600 --> 00:15:57.919
<v Speaker 11>So what's the difference of Like, where do you draw

209
00:15:57.960 --> 00:16:03.000
<v Speaker 11>the line between continue with the Old Testament and judea isa?

210
00:16:04.799 --> 00:16:07.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the New Testament lays down some guidelines

211
00:16:07.399 --> 00:16:10.279
<v Speaker 9>and then the rest of the Apostolic tradition would be

212
00:16:10.320 --> 00:16:13.080
<v Speaker 9>the other guidelines. So the guidance of the church as

213
00:16:13.159 --> 00:16:17.480
<v Speaker 9>the established authority being via Apostolic succession, the College of

214
00:16:17.480 --> 00:16:20.480
<v Speaker 9>the Apostles that Jesus set up, they would be able

215
00:16:20.559 --> 00:16:23.679
<v Speaker 9>to make further decisions as you see for example in

216
00:16:23.720 --> 00:16:27.399
<v Speaker 9>the quarter Disseminarian controversy in the second third century, the

217
00:16:27.519 --> 00:16:29.840
<v Speaker 9>Nicene Council ruling on some of these things as to

218
00:16:29.960 --> 00:16:32.440
<v Speaker 9>what's appropriate and not appropriate in terms of the Old Testament.

219
00:16:32.879 --> 00:16:35.200
<v Speaker 9>So it's a twofold thing between what's in the New

220
00:16:35.279 --> 00:16:40.120
<v Speaker 9>Testament and what the Apostolic tradition and the Apsoltic succession rules.

221
00:16:41.639 --> 00:16:47.039
<v Speaker 11>Okay, so basically, well, correct me if I'm wrong. But

222
00:16:47.200 --> 00:16:49.960
<v Speaker 11>what I'm kind of hearing is that the way to

223
00:16:50.600 --> 00:16:54.679
<v Speaker 11>so the difference is it's kind of close, like they're

224
00:16:54.799 --> 00:16:59.159
<v Speaker 11>pretty related. And the only way to avoid falling into

225
00:16:59.360 --> 00:17:03.200
<v Speaker 11>like judaizing you hatra rely in the church, is that

226
00:17:03.279 --> 00:17:04.039
<v Speaker 11>what you're kind of saying.

227
00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:08.960
<v Speaker 9>The principles are laid down in the New Testament in

228
00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:13.119
<v Speaker 9>general as to what things are fulfilled and which things

229
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:17.480
<v Speaker 9>are still quote binding. But Jesus gave the apostles the

230
00:17:17.559 --> 00:17:20.759
<v Speaker 9>authority to bind and to loose and to make those decisions,

231
00:17:21.240 --> 00:17:24.160
<v Speaker 9>and their successors have that same authority to bind and

232
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:27.640
<v Speaker 9>to loose, So that means the ability to decide what

233
00:17:27.839 --> 00:17:31.000
<v Speaker 9>things are normative, for example, for gentiles to come into

234
00:17:31.039 --> 00:17:33.960
<v Speaker 9>the church. And if you look at Acts fifteen, that's

235
00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:36.480
<v Speaker 9>an example of that binding and loosing power. Where the

236
00:17:36.519 --> 00:17:39.559
<v Speaker 9>apostles get together they look at the Covenant of Noah

237
00:17:39.720 --> 00:17:41.799
<v Speaker 9>and they reason that if Noah was able to be

238
00:17:41.880 --> 00:17:46.920
<v Speaker 9>made righteous through the Noeic Covenant, then the expectation should

239
00:17:46.960 --> 00:17:49.960
<v Speaker 9>be no more for gentiles that convert to the Church.

240
00:17:50.680 --> 00:17:55.079
<v Speaker 9>And that same principle is what you see in the first, second,

241
00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:58.359
<v Speaker 9>and third century when the Church has to make similar

242
00:17:58.400 --> 00:17:59.279
<v Speaker 9>types of decisions.

243
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, thank you, yes, that was a good question.

244
00:18:10.039 --> 00:18:17.000
<v Speaker 9>Quell quell unbreller, and then we'll go to Erwan.

245
00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:29.000
<v Speaker 10>H.

246
00:18:29.079 --> 00:18:32.079
<v Speaker 9>Brozy sends five bucks and says, lmfao that dude started

247
00:18:32.160 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 9>off son it's goods so as as f but he

248
00:18:34.920 --> 00:18:36.880
<v Speaker 9>redeemed himself. He made a decent point. Yeah, I think

249
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:39.839
<v Speaker 9>so cool. A two dollars. I appreciate your work bringing

250
00:18:39.880 --> 00:18:43.480
<v Speaker 9>people to the truth. Thank you, man, appreciate that. Theosis

251
00:18:44.599 --> 00:18:50.599
<v Speaker 9>Pilgrim ten dollars. You There. Genesis Creation Early Man is

252
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:51.200
<v Speaker 9>back in print.

253
00:18:51.279 --> 00:18:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I know.

254
00:18:51.759 --> 00:18:55.079
<v Speaker 9>I think I tweeted about it or talked about it

255
00:18:55.200 --> 00:18:59.799
<v Speaker 9>on a recent stream. Erwan, you want to I'm mute, Hey.

256
00:18:59.720 --> 00:19:02.359
<v Speaker 15>Jay, I just had a question, who do you think

257
00:19:02.440 --> 00:19:06.960
<v Speaker 15>would win in a fight between Yakub and Messiah and sasquestion.

258
00:19:09.119 --> 00:19:16.200
<v Speaker 9>I'm wondering if Yakoub might actually be incarnate as Messiah

259
00:19:16.279 --> 00:19:24.799
<v Speaker 9>been Sasquatch. So that's actually a trick question, Joshua. Theosis

260
00:19:24.839 --> 00:19:27.200
<v Speaker 9>Pilgrim said that Early Genesis Creation, Early Man, my father

261
00:19:27.240 --> 00:19:29.720
<v Speaker 9>siprom Ros is back in print. It's a hardcover, good quality.

262
00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:32.720
<v Speaker 9>I laugh pretty hard at Messiah and Sasquatch. Well, I

263
00:19:33.319 --> 00:19:37.880
<v Speaker 9>couldn't believe that one of the Mormon prophets claims that

264
00:19:38.920 --> 00:19:41.720
<v Speaker 9>Sasquatch is real and it's Kane. We went and looked

265
00:19:41.759 --> 00:19:43.559
<v Speaker 9>it up Joshua and mute, what's up?

266
00:19:43.599 --> 00:19:43.720
<v Speaker 16>Man?

267
00:19:44.759 --> 00:19:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's happened? I just have one question. Do you

268
00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:49.759
<v Speaker 4>think Protestants are going to Hell or not?

269
00:19:50.920 --> 00:19:53.359
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I don't judge people on an individual basis,

270
00:19:53.799 --> 00:19:57.880
<v Speaker 9>but I judge the public confession of their groups. So

271
00:19:58.079 --> 00:20:01.000
<v Speaker 9>this is this is what's called in the tradition of

272
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:06.559
<v Speaker 9>legal theory jurisprudence, you know, a public judgment. So public

273
00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:09.960
<v Speaker 9>judgment means I'm judging the profession of that group and

274
00:20:10.079 --> 00:20:12.119
<v Speaker 9>what they stand for. It doesn't mean that I know

275
00:20:12.279 --> 00:20:15.279
<v Speaker 9>the eternal destiny of each of those persons. But Protestantism

276
00:20:15.559 --> 00:20:19.400
<v Speaker 9>is really just a confluence of almost all of the

277
00:20:19.519 --> 00:20:23.680
<v Speaker 9>ancient heresies of the first six seventh centuries, all right.

278
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:31.599
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I'm just thinking more and more about how Americanists,

279
00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:35.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, Protestanism is and just how you know, it's

280
00:20:35.599 --> 00:20:38.440
<v Speaker 9>really just a do it yourself. I don't need anyone else,

281
00:20:38.480 --> 00:20:41.200
<v Speaker 9>I don't need anything else. And you see all of

282
00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:45.599
<v Speaker 9>these you know, influencers with all of these you know,

283
00:20:45.759 --> 00:20:49.920
<v Speaker 9>millions of people, and it's just like, how do how

284
00:20:49.960 --> 00:20:52.640
<v Speaker 9>do people? Does it just never occur to anybody that

285
00:20:54.160 --> 00:21:01.519
<v Speaker 9>there's a history to all this stuff. So guys remember

286
00:21:01.680 --> 00:21:04.160
<v Speaker 9>looking for people who would like to discuss the topics

287
00:21:04.240 --> 00:21:09.440
<v Speaker 9>as listed, particularly Protestantism, but it's also open to Catholics, Muslims, whoever.

288
00:21:10.160 --> 00:21:24.799
<v Speaker 9>Quelln Rayler, Okay, I'm mute.

289
00:21:26.160 --> 00:21:28.960
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I was just went to say anyway, my question

290
00:21:29.079 --> 00:21:33.440
<v Speaker 17>is related to eschatology. You know how like the institution

291
00:21:33.559 --> 00:21:35.880
<v Speaker 17>of meat, right, God instituted the eating of meat, and

292
00:21:36.079 --> 00:21:39.599
<v Speaker 17>after price res Russian, he ate a fish. So do

293
00:21:39.640 --> 00:21:41.880
<v Speaker 17>you think that in the Esketon, since there's no death,

294
00:21:41.960 --> 00:21:42.920
<v Speaker 17>how are we gonna eat fish?

295
00:21:42.960 --> 00:21:46.920
<v Speaker 9>And like meat and stuff, our bodies won't need that

296
00:21:47.079 --> 00:21:49.480
<v Speaker 9>type of sustenance. I think he does it as a

297
00:21:50.279 --> 00:21:53.480
<v Speaker 9>condescension to show that it's the same body as before.

298
00:21:54.200 --> 00:21:56.240
<v Speaker 9>I don't think he did it because his body needed

299
00:21:56.279 --> 00:21:59.720
<v Speaker 9>that sustenance. And in the Esketon, our bodies will not

300
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:02.640
<v Speaker 9>need the type of sustenance that we need now. It'll

301
00:22:02.680 --> 00:22:05.359
<v Speaker 9>be a glorified body. So I don't think there will

302
00:22:05.400 --> 00:22:07.799
<v Speaker 9>be eating of meat now, Carl Minger, it won't be necessary.

303
00:22:15.759 --> 00:22:20.400
<v Speaker 18>Aka, yes, sir, Hey, I was listening to your Mormon

304
00:22:20.440 --> 00:22:23.680
<v Speaker 18>stream the other day, and I was born and raised Mormon.

305
00:22:24.680 --> 00:22:27.359
<v Speaker 14>I actually grew up believing that Gane was Sasquatch.

306
00:22:27.480 --> 00:22:32.759
<v Speaker 9>Oh really, Yeah, so this is kind of widely believed.

307
00:22:32.759 --> 00:22:34.240
<v Speaker 9>There are just a few people believe it.

308
00:22:35.559 --> 00:22:38.960
<v Speaker 14>I think it's mainly with the older generation. I was

309
00:22:39.039 --> 00:22:41.960
<v Speaker 14>told this by my dad, who was a boomer. He

310
00:22:42.119 --> 00:22:44.880
<v Speaker 14>converted when he was in his early twenties.

311
00:22:46.559 --> 00:22:49.160
<v Speaker 9>Wow. Well, so what led you out of Mormonism?

312
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:55.160
<v Speaker 18>Well, a lot of the history and then it just

313
00:22:55.319 --> 00:22:57.799
<v Speaker 18>it just led me to atheism because they believe in

314
00:22:57.839 --> 00:23:01.319
<v Speaker 18>they believe in the name, it's a physical body that

315
00:23:01.400 --> 00:23:02.160
<v Speaker 18>lives on a planet.

316
00:23:03.920 --> 00:23:06.279
<v Speaker 9>I'm sorry the ad popped on. They believe in what

317
00:23:06.400 --> 00:23:07.359
<v Speaker 9>can you repeat what you said?

318
00:23:08.720 --> 00:23:11.359
<v Speaker 14>They believe in a god that has a body that

319
00:23:11.480 --> 00:23:13.319
<v Speaker 14>lives out and on a planet.

320
00:23:13.680 --> 00:23:17.039
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, right, Like it's like an alien god. And I

321
00:23:17.240 --> 00:23:20.680
<v Speaker 9>just kind of completely Yeah, it's a it's a it's

322
00:23:20.799 --> 00:23:26.079
<v Speaker 9>like it's like scientology, like it's a sci fi space opera.

323
00:23:27.599 --> 00:23:32.000
<v Speaker 14>Yeah yeah yeah, And I mean and like Battles for Galactica. Yeah,

324
00:23:32.119 --> 00:23:33.319
<v Speaker 14>that's something my dad always told me.

325
00:23:33.359 --> 00:23:35.640
<v Speaker 4>He's like, yeah, that's right in my Mormons exactly.

326
00:23:35.720 --> 00:23:37.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. We covered that the other day on that stream

327
00:23:37.480 --> 00:23:41.119
<v Speaker 9>because Lords of Colob, that's a Mormon thing, right Colob.

328
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:46.200
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Yeah, they'd have hymns to uh p were to

329
00:23:46.279 --> 00:23:47.400
<v Speaker 14>hide to Colob.

330
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:52.519
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know anything else you want to leave us with.

331
00:23:52.559 --> 00:23:53.160
<v Speaker 9>I appreciate that.

332
00:23:55.359 --> 00:23:57.839
<v Speaker 18>It led me into atheism for a good fifteen years,

333
00:23:57.960 --> 00:23:59.839
<v Speaker 18>and then I found the Orthodox Church and I was

334
00:24:00.119 --> 00:24:02.079
<v Speaker 18>seeing into the church in January.

335
00:24:02.400 --> 00:24:04.720
<v Speaker 9>Oh awesome, man, many years. Do you appreciate that? Good

336
00:24:04.759 --> 00:24:08.400
<v Speaker 9>to hear it? Yeah? I think it was gonna if

337
00:24:08.440 --> 00:24:13.440
<v Speaker 9>I was gonna choose, you know, maybe Star Wars before

338
00:24:13.519 --> 00:24:16.720
<v Speaker 9>Disney got a hold of it. Maybe believe believe in

339
00:24:16.759 --> 00:24:18.039
<v Speaker 9>that sci fi universe.

340
00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:18.599
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

341
00:24:18.680 --> 00:24:20.680
<v Speaker 9>I'm trying to think of which sci fi universe I

342
00:24:20.799 --> 00:24:24.720
<v Speaker 9>want to live there. Uh But Orson Scott Card is

343
00:24:24.799 --> 00:24:27.400
<v Speaker 9>a Mormon sci fi writer, so that makes sense too,

344
00:24:27.480 --> 00:24:32.319
<v Speaker 9>because he writes like in his Enders Game and all that,

345
00:24:32.559 --> 00:24:35.799
<v Speaker 9>like the not the planets are different religions. So there's

346
00:24:35.839 --> 00:24:39.119
<v Speaker 9>a Catholic planet, there's a Mormon planet, and a Protestant planet.

347
00:24:40.240 --> 00:24:49.480
<v Speaker 9>If I remember correctly, Jennifer, the Lords sounds like a

348
00:24:49.599 --> 00:24:52.160
<v Speaker 9>metal like a death metal man to Lords of Kolob.

349
00:24:56.319 --> 00:24:59.839
<v Speaker 9>What's up, Jeffer, Yes, ma'am, I was.

350
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:02.799
<v Speaker 19>I want to ask about some of your articulations of

351
00:25:03.039 --> 00:25:04.839
<v Speaker 19>the monarchical trinitarian you.

352
00:25:06.319 --> 00:25:09.799
<v Speaker 2>So when you describe the difference between the Father, Sun.

353
00:25:09.640 --> 00:25:12.839
<v Speaker 19>Holy Spirit, as the Father is like the source or

354
00:25:13.359 --> 00:25:15.519
<v Speaker 19>you know, the fount or give heard a couple of

355
00:25:15.519 --> 00:25:19.759
<v Speaker 19>different words, how would you articulate the difference between his

356
00:25:20.079 --> 00:25:23.160
<v Speaker 19>being the source of self existence and obviously the Sun

357
00:25:23.240 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 19>and Spirit also being uncreated.

358
00:25:25.720 --> 00:25:26.799
<v Speaker 2>What is the difference between that?

359
00:25:28.160 --> 00:25:31.839
<v Speaker 9>Because it's an eternal generation and any internal spiration, so

360
00:25:32.400 --> 00:25:35.039
<v Speaker 9>it's not a cause in a temporal sense or the

361
00:25:35.079 --> 00:25:38.599
<v Speaker 9>way that creatures are caused. The more of the Mormons

362
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:42.880
<v Speaker 9>that the Aryans raise this objection to Saint Athanasius when

363
00:25:42.920 --> 00:25:45.559
<v Speaker 9>they when the Cappadocians, or when he talked about cause

364
00:25:46.200 --> 00:25:48.960
<v Speaker 9>the Eunomians to the Cappadocians, and the Arians to Athanasius,

365
00:25:49.000 --> 00:25:54.119
<v Speaker 9>they would say, well, cause implies temporal change and coming

366
00:25:54.200 --> 00:25:56.799
<v Speaker 9>into being when you were not. And the answer is

367
00:25:56.880 --> 00:26:00.839
<v Speaker 9>that cause is used in an analogical sense of an

368
00:26:00.920 --> 00:26:04.599
<v Speaker 9>eternal causing. So it's an eternal causing and coming forth.

369
00:26:04.680 --> 00:26:08.119
<v Speaker 9>It's not a beginning with a temporal sequence of something

370
00:26:08.200 --> 00:26:11.000
<v Speaker 9>coming to be. That's why the Son is eternally begotten

371
00:26:11.160 --> 00:26:14.440
<v Speaker 9>and eternally generated of the Father. In fact, this is

372
00:26:14.559 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 9>not just my quote monarchical trinitarianism. It's what the original

373
00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:22.960
<v Speaker 9>Nicene Creed says, following the theology of Athanasius, that the

374
00:26:23.079 --> 00:26:26.839
<v Speaker 9>Father is the eternal source of the eternally begotten Son,

375
00:26:27.400 --> 00:26:30.640
<v Speaker 9>and then the Kappadocians qualify that and make it more

376
00:26:30.680 --> 00:26:35.240
<v Speaker 9>specific in their writings to specify that the father's the

377
00:26:35.359 --> 00:26:38.440
<v Speaker 9>soul cause Soli, and then the son and the Spirit

378
00:26:38.480 --> 00:26:43.640
<v Speaker 9>are differentiated by their respective hypostetic properties, the son to

379
00:26:44.039 --> 00:26:46.279
<v Speaker 9>being generated, the spirit proceeding.

380
00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:51.599
<v Speaker 19>So could I think of it sort of like how

381
00:26:52.200 --> 00:26:56.440
<v Speaker 19>when Christ becomes incarnate in the flesh, he self limits himself.

382
00:26:56.480 --> 00:26:59.079
<v Speaker 19>It's not that he lacks the power when he's human

383
00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:02.480
<v Speaker 19>to do the things that are proper to God. It's

384
00:27:02.799 --> 00:27:07.559
<v Speaker 19>just sort of the place that is appropriate for the son.

385
00:27:08.160 --> 00:27:10.839
<v Speaker 19>So it's not that the spirit or the son necessarily

386
00:27:11.000 --> 00:27:13.640
<v Speaker 19>lacks the power to be self existent.

387
00:27:13.720 --> 00:27:17.079
<v Speaker 2>It's just the order that is the most.

388
00:27:18.359 --> 00:27:20.519
<v Speaker 9>I don't know how to if you look at So

389
00:27:20.680 --> 00:27:24.519
<v Speaker 9>this is a Muslim argument. It's called the Eunomian premise,

390
00:27:24.599 --> 00:27:27.599
<v Speaker 9>and the argument is that in order to be divine,

391
00:27:27.720 --> 00:27:31.839
<v Speaker 9>you must have the characteristic of being self existing, or

392
00:27:31.920 --> 00:27:35.880
<v Speaker 9>to be assay, And that's actually a logical fallacy. There's

393
00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:38.880
<v Speaker 9>nothing about being amongst the class of things that are

394
00:27:38.920 --> 00:27:43.799
<v Speaker 9>quote divine or uncreated that necessitates being self existent, because

395
00:27:43.880 --> 00:27:47.440
<v Speaker 9>for us, being self existent is part of what we

396
00:27:47.599 --> 00:27:49.359
<v Speaker 9>mean when we pick out the person of the father.

397
00:27:49.880 --> 00:27:53.279
<v Speaker 9>The father alone is the self existent one, or the

398
00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:56.799
<v Speaker 9>unoriginate one, according to the Kappadocians. But the fact that

399
00:27:56.880 --> 00:27:59.559
<v Speaker 9>he generates a son and generates a spirit who lack

400
00:27:59.680 --> 00:28:03.720
<v Speaker 9>that hypostatic property does not mean that they can't share

401
00:28:03.759 --> 00:28:06.319
<v Speaker 9>or don't have the same nature. So just like a

402
00:28:06.440 --> 00:28:10.960
<v Speaker 9>father begets a son, the son derives that nature from

403
00:28:11.039 --> 00:28:14.519
<v Speaker 9>the father that begot him right in a human sense,

404
00:28:14.920 --> 00:28:17.359
<v Speaker 9>but he doesn't have any less of the human nature

405
00:28:17.480 --> 00:28:20.400
<v Speaker 9>because he lacks being the source or the origin of

406
00:28:20.519 --> 00:28:23.440
<v Speaker 9>his nature. So in the same way, you would have

407
00:28:23.640 --> 00:28:30.079
<v Speaker 9>to demonstrate that divinity somehow necessarily requires being awse to

408
00:28:30.279 --> 00:28:33.079
<v Speaker 9>prove what's called the Unomian premise. And if you watch

409
00:28:33.240 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 9>the way that doctor bo Branson critiques Jake the muslim

410
00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:39.960
<v Speaker 9>Ata physician in their debate, is precisely upon this point.

411
00:28:40.359 --> 00:28:44.440
<v Speaker 9>Another way to look at this is so, for example,

412
00:28:44.559 --> 00:28:49.160
<v Speaker 9>we talk about carnivore and omnivore right to be amongst

413
00:28:49.200 --> 00:28:53.400
<v Speaker 9>the class of things that are meat eaters. Omnivores are

414
00:28:53.480 --> 00:28:58.400
<v Speaker 9>meat eaters, but they also eat other things, right, such

415
00:28:58.440 --> 00:29:02.000
<v Speaker 9>as vegetables. Of wars do not eat vegetables, they only

416
00:29:02.079 --> 00:29:05.480
<v Speaker 9>eat meat, But they're both amongst the class of things,

417
00:29:05.799 --> 00:29:09.799
<v Speaker 9>right that are quote meat eaters. It's just that omnivores

418
00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:13.519
<v Speaker 9>have more properties or attributes right that pick them out,

419
00:29:14.160 --> 00:29:17.519
<v Speaker 9>But they're still all amongst the class that's more general

420
00:29:17.599 --> 00:29:20.799
<v Speaker 9>of things called meat eaters. So do you see that

421
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:24.160
<v Speaker 9>lacking one of the properties does not mean that you're

422
00:29:24.200 --> 00:29:28.000
<v Speaker 9>not amongst the same class. So just because spirit and

423
00:29:28.200 --> 00:29:32.079
<v Speaker 9>son lack the property of being self existing, does not

424
00:29:32.279 --> 00:29:35.920
<v Speaker 9>mean that they lack the divine nature. Because in our theology,

425
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 9>self existing one or to be assay is particularly a

426
00:29:40.480 --> 00:29:43.119
<v Speaker 9>property of the person of the father. It's related to

427
00:29:43.160 --> 00:29:47.640
<v Speaker 9>the hypostatic properties, and hypocytic properties are not shared, okay,

428
00:29:47.839 --> 00:29:50.160
<v Speaker 9>because that picks out the father as the soul cause

429
00:29:50.160 --> 00:29:52.880
<v Speaker 9>of the fount, the unorriginal one, the self existing one.

430
00:29:55.359 --> 00:29:59.519
<v Speaker 19>So being uncreated would be obviously all three of them.

431
00:30:00.480 --> 00:30:03.480
<v Speaker 19>And then just because I guess my brain is stuck

432
00:30:03.519 --> 00:30:07.160
<v Speaker 19>in this like temporal like time for like time matters

433
00:30:07.240 --> 00:30:10.599
<v Speaker 19>to me because I'm in time rather than being you know.

434
00:30:10.680 --> 00:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>The eternal generation. It's just kind of hard to wrap

435
00:30:15.000 --> 00:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>my head around.

436
00:30:15.559 --> 00:30:17.720
<v Speaker 9>But well, it is a mystery, right, It's a mystery

437
00:30:17.759 --> 00:30:20.039
<v Speaker 9>that the Father has eternally generated to somebody who read

438
00:30:20.119 --> 00:30:22.559
<v Speaker 9>John one, I mean John speaks in that way, right.

439
00:30:22.640 --> 00:30:25.000
<v Speaker 9>He says that even when Jesus was amongst us, he

440
00:30:25.119 --> 00:30:26.960
<v Speaker 9>was eternal, he was always in the bosom of the Father.

441
00:30:27.039 --> 00:30:29.160
<v Speaker 9>He never left the bosom of the Father, even when

442
00:30:29.200 --> 00:30:29.880
<v Speaker 9>he was incarnate.

443
00:30:30.559 --> 00:30:33.799
<v Speaker 2>M okay, yeah, that's that's very helpful.

444
00:30:33.839 --> 00:30:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for that.

445
00:30:35.160 --> 00:30:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Do you mind if I ask about Hebrew six?

446
00:30:38.240 --> 00:30:38.279
<v Speaker 14>No?

447
00:30:39.880 --> 00:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Uh, so, I I guess I would still call it.

448
00:30:43.279 --> 00:30:45.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I wouldn't probably wouldn't call myself a Protestant still,

449
00:30:45.599 --> 00:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I've been an inquirer for a little while.

450
00:30:47.640 --> 00:30:51.960
<v Speaker 19>But speaking about sort of the idea of you know,

451
00:30:52.039 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 19>being eternally secure in Hebrew six, would this imply if

452
00:30:56.880 --> 00:31:01.599
<v Speaker 19>it's not implying internal security, which probably doesn't as I'm

453
00:31:01.680 --> 00:31:02.799
<v Speaker 19>reading it, you know more?

454
00:31:03.880 --> 00:31:06.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, remember these are these are Christians that have converted,

455
00:31:06.799 --> 00:31:09.680
<v Speaker 9>that have been baptized their Hebrews. So when Paul talks

456
00:31:09.720 --> 00:31:14.000
<v Speaker 9>about being enlightened and tasting the gift, he's talking about

457
00:31:14.079 --> 00:31:17.880
<v Speaker 9>baptism and Eucharist, and he's talking about becoming a partaker

458
00:31:17.920 --> 00:31:22.000
<v Speaker 9>of the Spirit, and he says, you've already tasted of

459
00:31:22.240 --> 00:31:25.960
<v Speaker 9>the age to come. Okay, that's not a false believer.

460
00:31:26.440 --> 00:31:29.400
<v Speaker 9>That's somebody who's really participated in the grace and in

461
00:31:29.480 --> 00:31:32.720
<v Speaker 9>the Covenant. Yeah, and there's a real possibility of being

462
00:31:32.839 --> 00:31:35.559
<v Speaker 9>cut out of that covenant exactly the way he warns

463
00:31:36.079 --> 00:31:38.759
<v Speaker 9>the church at Rome and Romans eleven. You guys can

464
00:31:38.799 --> 00:31:41.440
<v Speaker 9>be cut out if you're unbelieving, if you're unfaithful, and

465
00:31:41.440 --> 00:31:42.680
<v Speaker 9>if you're arrogant puffed up.

466
00:31:44.960 --> 00:31:47.960
<v Speaker 19>So would this imply that if you are at that

467
00:31:48.119 --> 00:31:52.519
<v Speaker 19>point where you have been baptized in, you've received the Eucharist,

468
00:31:52.599 --> 00:31:54.960
<v Speaker 19>and then you fall away, that there is that there's

469
00:31:55.079 --> 00:31:57.960
<v Speaker 19>no coming back from that, that you are.

470
00:31:57.960 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 2>Crucifying Christ a second time.

471
00:31:59.759 --> 00:32:00.200
<v Speaker 7>If you.

472
00:32:01.960 --> 00:32:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Attempt to come back.

473
00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:05.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that that there's always the possibility of

474
00:32:05.519 --> 00:32:09.440
<v Speaker 9>people repenting, and God's grace can reach anyone. But no,

475
00:32:09.599 --> 00:32:12.799
<v Speaker 9>if you persist until the end, right, and you die

476
00:32:12.960 --> 00:32:16.400
<v Speaker 9>without that, that's the hardening of the heart, That is

477
00:32:16.480 --> 00:32:18.720
<v Speaker 9>the rejection of the spirit, right, that's the blasphem of

478
00:32:18.720 --> 00:32:21.480
<v Speaker 9>the Holy Spirit. So you know the fact that people

479
00:32:21.680 --> 00:32:24.359
<v Speaker 9>might fall away from Christianity and then come back to

480
00:32:24.480 --> 00:32:26.720
<v Speaker 9>it later in life or something like that. I don't

481
00:32:26.759 --> 00:32:28.519
<v Speaker 9>think that it's I don't think Paul is saying that

482
00:32:29.400 --> 00:32:32.720
<v Speaker 9>a person who doubts and disbelieves can never come.

483
00:32:32.640 --> 00:32:36.640
<v Speaker 19>Back again, Okay, and then just one of those things,

484
00:32:36.640 --> 00:32:42.039
<v Speaker 19>if that's okay. I watched the video that you've recommended

485
00:32:42.079 --> 00:32:45.400
<v Speaker 19>a couple of times from Orthodox Shahada about the continuity

486
00:32:45.480 --> 00:32:49.359
<v Speaker 19>between the Old Testament and the Divine Liturgy, which was

487
00:32:49.480 --> 00:32:51.599
<v Speaker 19>very helpful and I'm very thankful for that. By the way,

488
00:32:51.640 --> 00:32:54.519
<v Speaker 19>it was a great video. Is there any sort of

489
00:32:54.680 --> 00:33:00.240
<v Speaker 19>historical lineage for the sort of chanting or the way

490
00:33:00.279 --> 00:33:03.160
<v Speaker 19>that the text is read in the Divine Liturgy?

491
00:33:04.039 --> 00:33:06.759
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's exactly. It's directly out of the synagogue, the

492
00:33:06.839 --> 00:33:09.079
<v Speaker 9>way that the synagogue has chanters and canters.

493
00:33:11.039 --> 00:33:13.519
<v Speaker 2>Awesome, Well, thank you so much. I really appreciate it.

494
00:33:13.559 --> 00:33:13.799
<v Speaker 7>Thanks you.

495
00:33:15.559 --> 00:33:29.079
<v Speaker 9>Those are really good questions. Appreciate that. Jacob Jordain five bucks.

496
00:33:29.160 --> 00:33:31.200
<v Speaker 9>I love Sam. But oddly it seems that the claims

497
00:33:31.200 --> 00:33:34.480
<v Speaker 9>a Vatican two and him seeing the anti trinitarian errors

498
00:33:34.559 --> 00:33:36.039
<v Speaker 9>of Catholicism.

499
00:33:35.599 --> 00:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Is not enough.

500
00:33:38.440 --> 00:33:40.559
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, you know, we'll see. It takes time.

501
00:33:40.680 --> 00:33:42.599
<v Speaker 9>People have to work through these issues. It took me

502
00:33:42.680 --> 00:33:44.279
<v Speaker 9>a long time to work through a lot of these issues.

503
00:33:44.359 --> 00:33:58.759
<v Speaker 9>So what's up, Jacob? Are you there got anute? Guys,

504
00:33:58.799 --> 00:34:00.400
<v Speaker 9>you gotta turn your mic on if you're coming out.

505
00:34:00.400 --> 00:34:02.839
<v Speaker 9>We're looking for Protestants, so please don't be all the

506
00:34:02.880 --> 00:34:04.880
<v Speaker 9>same Orthodox people to call in every time I do it.

507
00:34:05.000 --> 00:34:10.079
<v Speaker 9>Last room, Chrisky.

508
00:34:09.480 --> 00:34:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Master, Hey, can you hear me?

509
00:34:20.840 --> 00:34:24.880
<v Speaker 8>I sort of had like three main questions because I

510
00:34:25.039 --> 00:34:29.880
<v Speaker 8>was watching, like I think there were more early sort

511
00:34:29.880 --> 00:34:33.280
<v Speaker 8>of videos about tag and and sort of that whole thing.

512
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And I remember I was.

513
00:34:36.480 --> 00:34:38.679
<v Speaker 8>On TikTok yesterday just kind of scrolling through and I

514
00:34:38.760 --> 00:34:40.079
<v Speaker 8>ended up debating these Muslims.

515
00:34:41.400 --> 00:34:45.719
<v Speaker 14>And one of the one of the things that was really.

516
00:34:45.599 --> 00:34:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Confusing to me.

517
00:34:46.639 --> 00:34:48.599
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think you mentioned earlier is the idea

518
00:34:48.679 --> 00:34:52.719
<v Speaker 8>that in order to have divine nature you have to

519
00:34:52.920 --> 00:34:56.360
<v Speaker 8>also have been unngenerated basically, and the way that the

520
00:34:56.440 --> 00:35:03.320
<v Speaker 8>father is Wait, who said that, uh for I think

521
00:35:03.320 --> 00:35:04.320
<v Speaker 8>it was a Muslim or something like that.

522
00:35:04.400 --> 00:35:07.960
<v Speaker 9>That's the Muslim argument. That's exactly what the woman before

523
00:35:08.039 --> 00:35:13.400
<v Speaker 9>you was saying. Yeah, so you want an answer to that?

524
00:35:15.559 --> 00:35:19.159
<v Speaker 8>Well, so sort of I guess because of the response

525
00:35:19.199 --> 00:35:23.719
<v Speaker 8>that I had was a most eloquent way of answering

526
00:35:23.840 --> 00:35:24.239
<v Speaker 8>that you did.

527
00:35:24.320 --> 00:35:25.599
<v Speaker 13>But then another thing.

528
00:35:27.920 --> 00:35:30.559
<v Speaker 8>That I was kind of thinking about was sort of

529
00:35:30.639 --> 00:35:31.440
<v Speaker 8>the temporal thing.

530
00:35:31.480 --> 00:35:32.800
<v Speaker 2>That's one thing I really did have to get my

531
00:35:32.840 --> 00:35:36.440
<v Speaker 2>head around pretty harshly, was.

532
00:35:36.519 --> 00:35:38.800
<v Speaker 7>The idea that even though.

533
00:35:40.199 --> 00:35:42.559
<v Speaker 8>The Son and the Spirit are generated from the Father,

534
00:35:42.679 --> 00:35:47.679
<v Speaker 8>that doesn't mean that they don't share divine nature. And

535
00:35:47.760 --> 00:35:51.039
<v Speaker 8>it was something that kind of like I understood it subtly,

536
00:35:51.320 --> 00:35:54.239
<v Speaker 8>but it wasn't something that I fully understood until I

537
00:35:54.320 --> 00:35:58.280
<v Speaker 8>started kind of looking into like different qualifiers, so what

538
00:35:58.400 --> 00:35:59.400
<v Speaker 8>divine nature even is?

539
00:36:03.800 --> 00:36:07.920
<v Speaker 2>And then the second thing, the second.

540
00:36:07.639 --> 00:36:10.960
<v Speaker 8>Thing that I have like a sort of question on

541
00:36:11.360 --> 00:36:14.960
<v Speaker 8>was specifically about the I don't know I say it properly,

542
00:36:15.039 --> 00:36:17.320
<v Speaker 8>but the seven Ecumenical Councils.

543
00:36:17.079 --> 00:36:17.440
<v Speaker 12>Right is that?

544
00:36:20.280 --> 00:36:23.719
<v Speaker 8>So I was I was wondering, uh, because this is

545
00:36:23.760 --> 00:36:25.719
<v Speaker 8>one thing where like when I was becoming Christian, I

546
00:36:25.840 --> 00:36:30.960
<v Speaker 8>was kind of weighing between Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism. What

547
00:36:31.119 --> 00:36:35.559
<v Speaker 8>it's specifically with the Roman I guess, uh, I guess

548
00:36:35.559 --> 00:36:36.320
<v Speaker 8>there's probably.

549
00:36:36.079 --> 00:36:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Multiple points, but with the Ecumenical.

550
00:36:40.360 --> 00:36:44.719
<v Speaker 8>Councils, I don't know which one it was, but it's.

551
00:36:44.639 --> 00:36:46.079
<v Speaker 14>Basically the Uh.

552
00:36:47.719 --> 00:36:52.039
<v Speaker 8>The Roman Catholicism like uh idolization and stuff like that,

553
00:36:52.199 --> 00:36:55.159
<v Speaker 8>where you see that like a lot of and this

554
00:36:55.280 --> 00:36:56.960
<v Speaker 8>is something that I noticed distinctly, is that a lot

555
00:36:57.000 --> 00:37:01.800
<v Speaker 8>of like the idols and the art, like the illustrations

556
00:37:01.840 --> 00:37:04.760
<v Speaker 8>they have, they seem almost.

557
00:37:04.840 --> 00:37:05.760
<v Speaker 9>Like very h.

558
00:37:07.280 --> 00:37:08.039
<v Speaker 5>Like very uh.

559
00:37:08.440 --> 00:37:10.480
<v Speaker 8>I just in here would probably be the best way

560
00:37:10.480 --> 00:37:12.119
<v Speaker 8>I could put it, though it's probably not a great way.

561
00:37:12.519 --> 00:37:18.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they're they're they're emotionalists, they're sensationalist, they are essentially

562
00:37:18.559 --> 00:37:23.599
<v Speaker 9>it's essentially pagan art. So you're asking what specifically rebukes that, Well,

563
00:37:24.519 --> 00:37:27.119
<v Speaker 9>if the principles of the Canons of the seven Ecumenical

564
00:37:27.199 --> 00:37:29.480
<v Speaker 9>councils lay out the beginning of that, or excuse me,

565
00:37:29.559 --> 00:37:31.920
<v Speaker 9>the Seventh Council. So the Seventh Ecamenical Council and its

566
00:37:32.000 --> 00:37:35.840
<v Speaker 9>canons mentions icons multiple times in the canons, and it says,

567
00:37:35.880 --> 00:37:41.159
<v Speaker 9>for example, you cannot make images of the Father. Later on,

568
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:45.760
<v Speaker 9>in eight forty three, there is the Byzantine Synod, which

569
00:37:45.800 --> 00:37:48.840
<v Speaker 9>we call the Orthodox Church the Triumph of Orthodoxy Sunday.

570
00:37:48.880 --> 00:37:51.599
<v Speaker 9>This is when the iconic class were defeated and the

571
00:37:51.840 --> 00:37:56.079
<v Speaker 9>icons were restored. That council put together a document which

572
00:37:56.239 --> 00:38:00.719
<v Speaker 9>is called the sonatacon Sonoticon goes into great d listing

573
00:38:00.800 --> 00:38:02.920
<v Speaker 9>all of the heresies and all the things that are condemned,

574
00:38:04.000 --> 00:38:09.320
<v Speaker 9>many different positions and errors. It reaffirms other statements about iconography.

575
00:38:09.800 --> 00:38:12.440
<v Speaker 9>The book you want to read is Theology the Icon

576
00:38:12.599 --> 00:38:16.400
<v Speaker 9>Volume one and two by Lasky and Ospensky. Particularly volume

577
00:38:16.480 --> 00:38:20.519
<v Speaker 9>two goes into much more detail about the Palamite theological

578
00:38:21.079 --> 00:38:24.519
<v Speaker 9>principles behind iconography. There's a whole chapter on that, and

579
00:38:24.599 --> 00:38:26.840
<v Speaker 9>then later on you get into the principles that are

580
00:38:26.920 --> 00:38:30.920
<v Speaker 9>laid out in the Moscow Icon Synods about why certain

581
00:38:31.000 --> 00:38:34.800
<v Speaker 9>things are wrong in terms of iconography. Which icons are heterodox,

582
00:38:34.880 --> 00:38:37.280
<v Speaker 9>for example, the ones that teach the Philly oquay. So

583
00:38:37.760 --> 00:38:40.519
<v Speaker 9>all of that needs to be taken into account. And

584
00:38:40.719 --> 00:38:43.360
<v Speaker 9>some people misunderstood when I made the icon video. They

585
00:38:43.400 --> 00:38:46.360
<v Speaker 9>thought that I was saying that the seven of that

586
00:38:46.440 --> 00:38:49.760
<v Speaker 9>con Medical Council explicitly says we reject Roman Catholic artwork.

587
00:38:49.920 --> 00:38:52.960
<v Speaker 9>I said nothing like that. In the Orthodox Church, when

588
00:38:53.000 --> 00:38:56.119
<v Speaker 9>the eight forty three Council states the triumph of Orthodoxy,

589
00:38:56.280 --> 00:38:58.400
<v Speaker 9>that for us is part of the Seventh Council. That's

590
00:38:58.480 --> 00:39:00.840
<v Speaker 9>the victory of the Seventh Council. We don't have this

591
00:39:01.000 --> 00:39:03.719
<v Speaker 9>legalistic Roman Catholic view that the only thing that matters

592
00:39:04.239 --> 00:39:06.840
<v Speaker 9>is the document that the Pope signs off on. For us,

593
00:39:06.880 --> 00:39:10.519
<v Speaker 9>those are holistically part of the liturgical tradition. And so

594
00:39:10.679 --> 00:39:15.199
<v Speaker 9>if the eight forty three Triumph of Orthodoxy pronouncements in

595
00:39:15.239 --> 00:39:19.679
<v Speaker 9>the Sonoticon become part of the Orthodox universal universal liturgical tradition,

596
00:39:20.119 --> 00:39:22.280
<v Speaker 9>for us, they're received, and they're part of our dogmas,

597
00:39:22.320 --> 00:39:25.079
<v Speaker 9>They're part of our tradition. Yes, I know that the

598
00:39:25.159 --> 00:39:28.639
<v Speaker 9>Sonaticon has variations in it, and I know that different bishops,

599
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:32.800
<v Speaker 9>even up into today, can add groups that are rejected,

600
00:39:32.960 --> 00:39:36.880
<v Speaker 9>such as the Joe's Witnesses, other cults and sex can

601
00:39:36.960 --> 00:39:41.760
<v Speaker 9>be mentioned in modern bishops versions of the Sonaticon. But

602
00:39:42.320 --> 00:39:44.519
<v Speaker 9>the principle is still the same, and the principles of

603
00:39:44.559 --> 00:39:47.960
<v Speaker 9>the iconographic tradition are still the same. And the best

604
00:39:48.000 --> 00:39:51.400
<v Speaker 9>book on that is the volume two of Lavsky Knowspensky.

605
00:39:51.519 --> 00:39:54.039
<v Speaker 9>And if you read that, you will see that all

606
00:39:54.079 --> 00:39:55.920
<v Speaker 9>of the things that you've heard me argue over the

607
00:39:56.000 --> 00:39:59.480
<v Speaker 9>last early years, they're all laid out there. So I'm

608
00:39:59.519 --> 00:40:03.519
<v Speaker 9>not making up things or randomly just saying crap, And

609
00:40:03.599 --> 00:40:05.440
<v Speaker 9>I have no idea where I'm getting in I'm just

610
00:40:05.519 --> 00:40:09.159
<v Speaker 9>asserting stuff. I give you guys the books and the

611
00:40:09.280 --> 00:40:11.760
<v Speaker 9>references all the time, but there's a lot of really

612
00:40:11.840 --> 00:40:17.320
<v Speaker 9>low quality, low tier, low information voters, especially online, who

613
00:40:17.360 --> 00:40:19.320
<v Speaker 9>don't know any of this stuff. Guys, if you what

614
00:40:19.480 --> 00:40:21.480
<v Speaker 9>we have with over a one thousand people a minute

615
00:40:21.519 --> 00:40:23.320
<v Speaker 9>ago and we got two hundred and seventy five likes,

616
00:40:23.400 --> 00:40:26.400
<v Speaker 9>hit Like, let's put this up to the top. Let's

617
00:40:26.400 --> 00:40:30.079
<v Speaker 9>get some good callers, let's get some good exchanges with

618
00:40:30.280 --> 00:40:32.639
<v Speaker 9>Wi Fi Gospel five bucks. Hey, what's the orthodox understanding

619
00:40:32.639 --> 00:40:35.519
<v Speaker 9>of tewod Peter three sixteen? How did Peter know that

620
00:40:35.559 --> 00:40:40.559
<v Speaker 9>Paul's writing for scripture? Peter was a divinely inspired apostle,

621
00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:44.679
<v Speaker 9>and so when he preached or teached, taught, excuse me,

622
00:40:44.920 --> 00:40:47.599
<v Speaker 9>preached or taught the Word of God, he knew it

623
00:40:47.880 --> 00:40:50.559
<v Speaker 9>was inspired word of God. Likewise, he would have also

624
00:40:50.599 --> 00:40:56.360
<v Speaker 9>been able to recognize Paul's authoritative teaching, and he presumably

625
00:40:56.440 --> 00:40:58.559
<v Speaker 9>then had access to and knowledge of what's called the

626
00:40:58.599 --> 00:41:01.639
<v Speaker 9>autograph of the autogra are the ones that Paul himself wrote.

627
00:41:02.039 --> 00:41:05.480
<v Speaker 9>Nobody has these. We don't have AUTOGRAPHA. All we have

628
00:41:06.000 --> 00:41:11.000
<v Speaker 9>in the church are copies of the apostolic writings and

629
00:41:11.039 --> 00:41:15.159
<v Speaker 9>the Gospels, and that's why the church tradition is absolutely

630
00:41:15.320 --> 00:41:20.039
<v Speaker 9>necessary to understanding and knowing the candidate scripture. And that's

631
00:41:20.079 --> 00:41:24.039
<v Speaker 9>a huge point against Protestantism. It's not just the argument

632
00:41:24.079 --> 00:41:27.599
<v Speaker 9>as many low tier Protestants have misunderstood, because many bad

633
00:41:27.719 --> 00:41:31.079
<v Speaker 9>Roman Catholic apologists say, you don't have infallible pope, so

634
00:41:31.159 --> 00:41:33.920
<v Speaker 9>you can't know the Bible infallibly. That's kind of a

635
00:41:33.960 --> 00:41:37.079
<v Speaker 9>bad argument, and we don't go that route because one

636
00:41:37.360 --> 00:41:41.119
<v Speaker 9>is an epistemic question about individual certitude and to just

637
00:41:41.159 --> 00:41:43.280
<v Speaker 9>say that the pope tells you that just moves a

638
00:41:43.320 --> 00:41:45.159
<v Speaker 9>problem back and stuff, because it assumes that you can

639
00:41:45.360 --> 00:41:51.280
<v Speaker 9>accurately interpret the pope's teachings. Secondly, that's a question of normativity.

640
00:41:51.440 --> 00:41:54.639
<v Speaker 9>Normativity means the ability to buying people. Kind of like

641
00:41:54.760 --> 00:41:59.639
<v Speaker 9>the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. It's not everybody in

642
00:41:59.679 --> 00:42:02.199
<v Speaker 9>America just interpreting it the way they want. There's an

643
00:42:02.599 --> 00:42:05.840
<v Speaker 9>authority that has the ability to bind people to that

644
00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:09.519
<v Speaker 9>interpretation and to bind consciences. And that's something that the

645
00:42:09.559 --> 00:42:14.280
<v Speaker 9>Protestant Reformation is premised on. Rejecting. Protestant theology from the

646
00:42:14.360 --> 00:42:16.840
<v Speaker 9>Reformation on says that they have the freedom of conscience,

647
00:42:16.880 --> 00:42:19.960
<v Speaker 9>the rights of private interpretation. That's a rejection of the

648
00:42:20.079 --> 00:42:24.400
<v Speaker 9>notion of normative authority. That's a different question from individual

649
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:27.639
<v Speaker 9>existential certitude about how do I know what the Canons

650
00:42:27.639 --> 00:42:30.760
<v Speaker 9>scripture is? How do I know that Matthew wrote Matthew.

651
00:42:30.960 --> 00:42:34.440
<v Speaker 9>Those are difficult questions and they cannot be divorced once

652
00:42:34.480 --> 00:42:37.639
<v Speaker 9>you get into this from the history of the church

653
00:42:38.320 --> 00:42:40.639
<v Speaker 9>and the history of the bishops and the Apostolic sees

654
00:42:41.679 --> 00:42:45.400
<v Speaker 9>maintaining the tradition, for example, that Matthew wrote Matthew's Gospel.

655
00:42:46.679 --> 00:42:51.880
<v Speaker 9>You see, why aren't you Catholic? I mean, I've got

656
00:42:52.320 --> 00:42:54.599
<v Speaker 9>thirteen hundred videos on my channel telling you why I'm

657
00:42:54.599 --> 00:42:55.039
<v Speaker 9>not Catholic.

658
00:42:55.119 --> 00:42:55.320
<v Speaker 10>Dude.

659
00:42:56.480 --> 00:42:59.840
<v Speaker 9>That's why we have these open discussions here almost every

660
00:42:59.840 --> 00:43:03.280
<v Speaker 9>other day, and all you have to do is call

661
00:43:03.320 --> 00:43:05.639
<v Speaker 9>in right here. So if you want to go to

662
00:43:05.679 --> 00:43:08.599
<v Speaker 9>the head of the line, and please, guys, I'm looking

663
00:43:08.639 --> 00:43:12.960
<v Speaker 9>for people who are Protestant or Catholic or Muslim. I

664
00:43:13.039 --> 00:43:16.480
<v Speaker 9>want them to call in. So take your catechumen questions

665
00:43:17.239 --> 00:43:21.920
<v Speaker 9>to your priest. I'm not your catechist, Okay. If you

666
00:43:21.960 --> 00:43:23.880
<v Speaker 9>don't have a catechist, then I understand you're in a

667
00:43:23.920 --> 00:43:26.639
<v Speaker 9>difficult situation. But every time I do this, all the

668
00:43:26.760 --> 00:43:29.480
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox catechumens and inquirers come in here and they pile

669
00:43:29.559 --> 00:43:32.239
<v Speaker 9>in and they take up all the time that could

670
00:43:32.320 --> 00:43:36.360
<v Speaker 9>go to people who are Protestant or Muslim who need

671
00:43:36.440 --> 00:43:39.280
<v Speaker 9>to hear these things. So don't take up other people's

672
00:43:39.360 --> 00:43:44.239
<v Speaker 9>times just because you want your question about fasting or

673
00:43:44.480 --> 00:43:47.480
<v Speaker 9>calendars or whatever. That's not what this is for. Okay,

674
00:43:47.519 --> 00:43:51.079
<v Speaker 9>It's listed very clear Protestantism is false. So I want

675
00:43:51.119 --> 00:43:53.639
<v Speaker 9>those people to come on. Please do not bring me

676
00:43:54.000 --> 00:43:57.880
<v Speaker 9>your Orthodox catechuman questions. You do that at your church

677
00:43:57.960 --> 00:44:02.000
<v Speaker 9>with your catechists hushed tones.

678
00:44:05.480 --> 00:44:06.280
<v Speaker 14>Yo, can you hear me?

679
00:44:07.480 --> 00:44:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Awesome?

680
00:44:08.079 --> 00:44:10.639
<v Speaker 20>Sweet, I've been a long time listener, so I'm glad

681
00:44:10.679 --> 00:44:12.320
<v Speaker 20>I finally have something to ask.

682
00:44:12.440 --> 00:44:14.280
<v Speaker 4>But I promise it's not a catech human question.

683
00:44:16.000 --> 00:44:18.519
<v Speaker 20>So, like, I have an older family member right who's

684
00:44:18.559 --> 00:44:22.039
<v Speaker 20>a lifelong Baptist, and ever since I've been getting into Orthodox,

685
00:44:22.079 --> 00:44:23.320
<v Speaker 20>he's been more curious about it.

686
00:44:24.159 --> 00:44:27.039
<v Speaker 4>But it kind of seems like that like being a like,

687
00:44:27.199 --> 00:44:28.800
<v Speaker 4>so his view, he's.

688
00:44:28.719 --> 00:44:33.079
<v Speaker 20>Super into like Luther and Aquinas, but he also believes

689
00:44:33.159 --> 00:44:36.440
<v Speaker 20>in the Book of Enoch when that like contradicts Sola

690
00:44:36.519 --> 00:44:39.840
<v Speaker 20>script Torah. And then he's also super into like always

691
00:44:39.880 --> 00:44:44.039
<v Speaker 20>telling me about how the elites are doing the Kabbalah rituals.

692
00:44:44.119 --> 00:44:47.639
<v Speaker 20>The Trump getting shot was a ritual, and the JFK

693
00:44:47.800 --> 00:44:51.679
<v Speaker 20>stuff was a Masonic ritual. So like he's as a Baptist,

694
00:44:51.760 --> 00:44:55.360
<v Speaker 20>he's giving this like mystical power to these other like factions,

695
00:44:55.440 --> 00:44:55.639
<v Speaker 20>you know.

696
00:44:56.280 --> 00:44:59.960
<v Speaker 5>So and then as a Baptist it leaves, it leaves.

697
00:44:59.840 --> 00:45:03.519
<v Speaker 21>His are sacraments are mysticism as an Eastern Orthodox world

698
00:45:03.679 --> 00:45:06.840
<v Speaker 21>just as Christians in general as like merely symbolic and

699
00:45:07.000 --> 00:45:10.239
<v Speaker 21>not like giving us any like counter like to you know,

700
00:45:10.400 --> 00:45:14.639
<v Speaker 21>counteraction to this like mystical you know, evil or whatever.

701
00:45:14.840 --> 00:45:18.760
<v Speaker 21>So like, how does like Protestantism like ultimately leave to

702
00:45:18.920 --> 00:45:22.760
<v Speaker 21>like lead to the self defeating worldview where like we're

703
00:45:22.840 --> 00:45:23.960
<v Speaker 21>just reduced to symbols.

704
00:45:24.079 --> 00:45:25.159
<v Speaker 4>But then all these other.

705
00:45:25.400 --> 00:45:28.079
<v Speaker 9>Like traditions and oh that's an interesting point. Yeah, So,

706
00:45:28.440 --> 00:45:34.639
<v Speaker 9>like Protestantism sees the religion and particularly the way that

707
00:45:35.159 --> 00:45:38.119
<v Speaker 9>you know, the Lord's Supper or baptism, right, like Protestantism

708
00:45:38.199 --> 00:45:41.679
<v Speaker 9>sees that primarily as a kind of a symbolic function,

709
00:45:42.400 --> 00:45:46.840
<v Speaker 9>which is ironic because they have a judaized idea of

710
00:45:47.400 --> 00:45:50.320
<v Speaker 9>the sacraments, because their view of sacraments, for the most part,

711
00:45:50.920 --> 00:45:53.800
<v Speaker 9>unless they're high charged Protestants, is more or less the

712
00:45:53.880 --> 00:45:57.079
<v Speaker 9>way that we would say the Old Testament quote, sacraments functioned, right,

713
00:45:57.199 --> 00:46:00.639
<v Speaker 9>So circumcision or the temple rituals or whatever the Old Testament,

714
00:46:00.679 --> 00:46:04.480
<v Speaker 9>which are primarily typological pointing forward to the fulfillment of

715
00:46:04.480 --> 00:46:08.440
<v Speaker 9>the New Testament, Protestants really see the New Testament sacraments

716
00:46:08.679 --> 00:46:13.039
<v Speaker 9>as functionally no different than the Old Testament sacraments. And

717
00:46:13.199 --> 00:46:15.719
<v Speaker 9>the way that Paul argues, for example, and colautions, is

718
00:46:15.800 --> 00:46:21.679
<v Speaker 9>that circumcision was the type baptism. The ritual is the reality,

719
00:46:21.920 --> 00:46:25.960
<v Speaker 9>you see. So the New Testament sacraments bring the reality

720
00:46:26.199 --> 00:46:32.480
<v Speaker 9>and the power that the Old Testament sacraments foreshadowed, you see.

721
00:46:33.480 --> 00:46:39.079
<v Speaker 9>So to go back to a Old Testament notion of

722
00:46:39.199 --> 00:46:42.440
<v Speaker 9>what we think the sacraments in the Old Testament, this

723
00:46:42.679 --> 00:46:46.920
<v Speaker 9>pure symbolism type of view, like a Baptist, is retrograde, right.

724
00:46:47.079 --> 00:46:50.000
<v Speaker 9>It's removing the power. And it reminds me of what

725
00:46:50.079 --> 00:46:53.320
<v Speaker 9>Paul talks about a religion the form of godliness but

726
00:46:53.440 --> 00:46:59.000
<v Speaker 9>lacking the power thereof. But they will grant to sorcerers

727
00:46:59.159 --> 00:47:05.760
<v Speaker 9>and Talmudic magicians like all this magical power to run giant,

728
00:47:06.079 --> 00:47:09.519
<v Speaker 9>huge rituals and all this stuff. It's silly, But I

729
00:47:09.559 --> 00:47:11.239
<v Speaker 9>would say if I can, if you said it was

730
00:47:11.280 --> 00:47:13.400
<v Speaker 9>your uncle or your dad or whatever, but I would

731
00:47:13.440 --> 00:47:15.800
<v Speaker 9>just say, you know, older people are not going to

732
00:47:15.880 --> 00:47:18.360
<v Speaker 9>listen to you debating the position. You might as well

733
00:47:18.480 --> 00:47:35.559
<v Speaker 9>just invite him to church or something like that. Unism okay,

734
00:47:35.719 --> 00:47:38.519
<v Speaker 9>So if Forrest Drake won't come in here to debate,

735
00:47:39.159 --> 00:47:45.119
<v Speaker 9>just to boot the guy like this is okay, he

736
00:47:45.199 --> 00:47:47.800
<v Speaker 9>has no idea. Charles Francis, come in debate, you have

737
00:47:47.880 --> 00:47:49.679
<v Speaker 9>no idea what we're even talking about. This is so

738
00:47:50.920 --> 00:47:54.079
<v Speaker 9>these Protestants are so ignorant and arrogant, they have no

739
00:47:54.239 --> 00:47:57.559
<v Speaker 9>idea what even these words mean. And they're just like

740
00:47:58.239 --> 00:48:01.320
<v Speaker 9>super ready to debate. This is Protenism is a cancer, man,

741
00:48:01.320 --> 00:48:06.079
<v Speaker 9>It just produces all these idiots. If Charles and the

742
00:48:06.199 --> 00:48:09.840
<v Speaker 9>other dude uh don't won't come to debate in the chat,

743
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:12.400
<v Speaker 9>boot these people because they just monopolize the whole chat,

744
00:48:12.440 --> 00:48:13.519
<v Speaker 9>and all they don't want to do is span their

745
00:48:13.559 --> 00:48:28.679
<v Speaker 9>craft Unism on you man, all right, Okay, if you

746
00:48:28.719 --> 00:48:32.199
<v Speaker 9>don't turn your microphone on, you can't you won't be

747
00:48:32.239 --> 00:48:36.239
<v Speaker 9>able to speak in the spaces Dylan, what's up man?

748
00:48:41.840 --> 00:48:43.920
<v Speaker 9>Shout out to everybody in the chat, welcome, hit like

749
00:48:43.960 --> 00:48:46.360
<v Speaker 9>and share it. We got thirteen hundred viewers right now

750
00:48:46.480 --> 00:48:50.639
<v Speaker 9>if you would call in, if you would like to

751
00:48:51.000 --> 00:48:54.199
<v Speaker 9>discuss Protestanism, and you can also support the stream bias

752
00:48:54.280 --> 00:48:57.360
<v Speaker 9>super chats through stream labs or natively through YouTube. What's

753
00:48:57.440 --> 00:48:57.719
<v Speaker 9>up man?

754
00:49:02.519 --> 00:49:03.000
<v Speaker 14>Hey Jay?

755
00:49:04.239 --> 00:49:05.480
<v Speaker 9>Do you hear me? Yes?

756
00:49:06.400 --> 00:49:10.239
<v Speaker 22>Okay, Hey, So I have a question I raised in

757
00:49:10.360 --> 00:49:13.840
<v Speaker 22>the Protestant denomination. I would say I'm more like an

758
00:49:13.920 --> 00:49:17.679
<v Speaker 22>Orthodox in choir now and trying to try to wrap

759
00:49:17.719 --> 00:49:18.440
<v Speaker 22>my head around some.

760
00:49:18.519 --> 00:49:20.559
<v Speaker 4>Stuff to help my wife understand.

761
00:49:21.920 --> 00:49:26.840
<v Speaker 22>So in Protestantism and even in Catholicism, uh, there's a

762
00:49:26.960 --> 00:49:31.440
<v Speaker 22>sense of like I think the word is ecumenism or acumenism,

763
00:49:31.679 --> 00:49:34.440
<v Speaker 22>you know, kind of like a universal salvation.

764
00:49:35.280 --> 00:49:40.880
<v Speaker 14>As I believe in the Trinity, you believe in the Court.

765
00:49:41.159 --> 00:49:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Do trends.

766
00:49:41.840 --> 00:49:42.559
<v Speaker 9>That's all you need.

767
00:49:42.960 --> 00:49:45.480
<v Speaker 22>And I think even the Catholic Church has you can

768
00:49:45.519 --> 00:49:50.480
<v Speaker 22>be an invisible part of communion with the Church. I

769
00:49:50.639 --> 00:49:53.800
<v Speaker 22>haven't been able to find an answer to what is

770
00:49:53.880 --> 00:49:57.480
<v Speaker 22>the Orthodox position? I know there they say, you know,

771
00:49:57.800 --> 00:50:00.400
<v Speaker 22>with the One True Church, it's like Noah's this is

772
00:50:00.440 --> 00:50:04.519
<v Speaker 22>where salvation can be found. What is the I guess

773
00:50:05.239 --> 00:50:08.639
<v Speaker 22>you know, authoritative stance for right.

774
00:50:08.719 --> 00:50:13.039
<v Speaker 9>So essentially there's no invisible church doctrine. The Church is

775
00:50:13.119 --> 00:50:18.480
<v Speaker 9>just as much a visible, real historical reality as Christ's

776
00:50:18.519 --> 00:50:25.519
<v Speaker 9>physical body was one united in history. So invisible church

777
00:50:25.599 --> 00:50:28.079
<v Speaker 9>doctrine which is the basis for a humanism which is

778
00:50:28.199 --> 00:50:32.320
<v Speaker 9>kind of at the root of Anglican branch theory, that's

779
00:50:32.360 --> 00:50:35.079
<v Speaker 9>the origins of modern ecumenism. And you're right that it's

780
00:50:35.400 --> 00:50:38.760
<v Speaker 9>ultimately kind of a denial of the incarnation, and it's

781
00:50:38.800 --> 00:50:44.159
<v Speaker 9>a denial it's basically a Nestorian version of ecclesiology. So

782
00:50:44.239 --> 00:50:46.960
<v Speaker 9>the same heresy of Nestorias to divide the person of

783
00:50:47.079 --> 00:50:52.719
<v Speaker 9>Christ from the person to the logos, is applying that

784
00:50:52.880 --> 00:50:57.199
<v Speaker 9>same division to the body, the body of the Church,

785
00:50:58.119 --> 00:51:05.400
<v Speaker 9>and then to kind of make Christianity dissolve into countless sects. Right, No,

786
00:51:05.639 --> 00:51:08.719
<v Speaker 9>there's one church in history. Every one of the ecumenical

787
00:51:08.800 --> 00:51:12.039
<v Speaker 9>councils speaks as if the Church is a single, visible

788
00:51:12.119 --> 00:51:17.400
<v Speaker 9>historical institution. And every time that this comes up, you'll

789
00:51:17.440 --> 00:51:21.119
<v Speaker 9>see appeals to what the Creed calls the four marks

790
00:51:21.119 --> 00:51:23.440
<v Speaker 9>of the Church. I believe in one Holy Catholic and

791
00:51:23.480 --> 00:51:27.159
<v Speaker 9>Apostolic Church. Now Protestants, many of them will confess the

792
00:51:27.239 --> 00:51:29.679
<v Speaker 9>Nicene Creed, and they'll say that they believe in one

793
00:51:29.719 --> 00:51:32.360
<v Speaker 9>Holy Catholic and Epistolic Church. But of course they don't

794
00:51:32.440 --> 00:51:34.880
<v Speaker 9>mean it in the sense of the Cappadocians and the

795
00:51:34.920 --> 00:51:37.800
<v Speaker 9>people at the Second Ecumenical Council who compose that part

796
00:51:37.840 --> 00:51:40.920
<v Speaker 9>of the creed. They mean it in the Protestant sense

797
00:51:41.000 --> 00:51:44.000
<v Speaker 9>of one invisible church, et cetera, et cetera. It is

798
00:51:44.119 --> 00:51:48.880
<v Speaker 9>not what the Cappadocians meant when they wrote that. So, yeah,

799
00:51:48.960 --> 00:51:52.199
<v Speaker 9>the Church is a single body, a single treat, a

800
00:51:52.280 --> 00:51:57.280
<v Speaker 9>single covenant, a single sheep fold, a single house, a

801
00:51:57.440 --> 00:51:59.880
<v Speaker 9>single New Israel. I mean all of the and now

802
00:52:00.000 --> 00:52:03.159
<v Speaker 9>ologies even to the New Testament, make it a single institution,

803
00:52:03.840 --> 00:52:08.320
<v Speaker 9>not something divided amongst countless sects with countless competing confessions.

804
00:52:08.920 --> 00:52:11.480
<v Speaker 9>And even within the Roman Catholic Church, this doesn't exist

805
00:52:11.679 --> 00:52:15.159
<v Speaker 9>because the Roman Catholic Confession allows you to be a uniate,

806
00:52:15.800 --> 00:52:20.920
<v Speaker 9>to believe basically most of Orthodox theology, and to do

807
00:52:21.039 --> 00:52:23.719
<v Speaker 9>what you want, act like you want as if you're Orthodox.

808
00:52:24.800 --> 00:52:27.679
<v Speaker 9>But it's an inconsistent position because many of them don't

809
00:52:27.719 --> 00:52:30.360
<v Speaker 9>believe the Council Trent. They don't believe in purgatory, they

810
00:52:30.400 --> 00:52:33.599
<v Speaker 9>don't believe back in one. And yet in Roman Catholicism

811
00:52:33.719 --> 00:52:35.719
<v Speaker 9>you are bound and are supposed to believe all of

812
00:52:35.760 --> 00:52:38.440
<v Speaker 9>the ecumenical councils that the Pope signs off on. So

813
00:52:38.599 --> 00:52:41.639
<v Speaker 9>you see that that right there, the allowance within the

814
00:52:41.800 --> 00:52:47.039
<v Speaker 9>Roman system from multiple creeds and confessions disproves the Roman

815
00:52:47.159 --> 00:52:50.880
<v Speaker 9>system number one as actually possessing the unity of faith

816
00:52:50.960 --> 00:52:53.559
<v Speaker 9>that they claim to have, and number two, it shows

817
00:52:53.639 --> 00:52:57.840
<v Speaker 9>that they have contradictory systems within it that are just

818
00:52:57.920 --> 00:53:02.719
<v Speaker 9>about political power. The only church confessing the same confessions

819
00:53:02.880 --> 00:53:06.239
<v Speaker 9>of the ecadmenical councils is the Orthodox Church. That's why

820
00:53:06.320 --> 00:53:09.880
<v Speaker 9>we always go to the ecaemical councils and their canons.

821
00:53:10.400 --> 00:53:12.760
<v Speaker 9>There's nothing to do with whether the canons are infallible.

822
00:53:13.159 --> 00:53:15.280
<v Speaker 9>It's a question of whether the canons of the councils

823
00:53:15.400 --> 00:53:18.679
<v Speaker 9>express the mind of the church in that century, which

824
00:53:18.679 --> 00:53:22.239
<v Speaker 9>everyone admits that they do. But that means that the

825
00:53:24.599 --> 00:53:28.199
<v Speaker 9>Roman Catholic view is not true because it does not

826
00:53:28.360 --> 00:53:35.639
<v Speaker 9>confess the principles of those councils. It professes the deviation

827
00:53:35.880 --> 00:53:38.920
<v Speaker 9>that begins in the eighth ninth, tenth, and eleventh centuries,

828
00:53:40.039 --> 00:53:45.360
<v Speaker 9>particularly the Gregorian reforms. Dictatus pape. This evolves into unum sanctum,

829
00:53:45.639 --> 00:53:49.440
<v Speaker 9>where the pope now becomes a geopolitical world ruler that

830
00:53:49.519 --> 00:53:53.159
<v Speaker 9>doesn't exist in the first seven centuries, not even the

831
00:53:53.239 --> 00:53:54.000
<v Speaker 9>papal states.

832
00:53:54.280 --> 00:53:54.519
<v Speaker 7>Is that.

833
00:53:54.880 --> 00:53:59.519
<v Speaker 9>That's very new. And every modern historian, whether Orthodox or Catholic,

834
00:53:59.679 --> 00:54:07.840
<v Speaker 9>admit it's this now. Papadacus, Sashensky, Mayandorf Kongar de Vornik,

835
00:54:08.440 --> 00:54:12.239
<v Speaker 9>they all admit this. The Vatican now admits it eighty

836
00:54:12.840 --> 00:54:17.920
<v Speaker 9>Alexandria documents. So the mindset of the Roman Catholic is

837
00:54:18.000 --> 00:54:20.760
<v Speaker 9>living as if none of that has has been admitted.

838
00:54:21.239 --> 00:54:23.199
<v Speaker 9>Oh no, I don't care about any of that. I'm

839
00:54:23.239 --> 00:54:26.679
<v Speaker 9>going to pretend like the donation of Constantine wasn't a

840
00:54:26.719 --> 00:54:30.840
<v Speaker 9>forgery and the pope is a geopolitical world ruler. Still okay,

841
00:54:30.920 --> 00:54:34.320
<v Speaker 9>But Dictatus pape And when I'm sunk to say that

842
00:54:34.480 --> 00:54:37.880
<v Speaker 9>to be saved, you also have to confess that the

843
00:54:37.960 --> 00:54:43.119
<v Speaker 9>pope is a legitimate temporal state power. To be saved,

844
00:54:43.320 --> 00:54:46.280
<v Speaker 9>it's not just believe in the Roman Catholic miship the

845
00:54:46.360 --> 00:54:50.599
<v Speaker 9>Romans is going to be saved. It's also belief in

846
00:54:50.679 --> 00:54:55.360
<v Speaker 9>the temporal supremacy the Roman vision to be saved. Jonathan,

847
00:54:56.199 --> 00:55:04.960
<v Speaker 9>it was Colon here turn a fan off, got on

848
00:55:05.079 --> 00:55:09.880
<v Speaker 9>mute Jonathan? Hey, yes, sir, Hey Jay?

849
00:55:11.480 --> 00:55:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Sorry?

850
00:55:11.840 --> 00:55:15.719
<v Speaker 5>So the oh first off, really big fan, really awesome

851
00:55:15.800 --> 00:55:17.920
<v Speaker 5>to have someone on the Orthodox I had to get

852
00:55:18.039 --> 00:55:24.480
<v Speaker 5>perspective on. I wanted to focus on sol scriptura and

853
00:55:24.639 --> 00:55:29.400
<v Speaker 5>the concept behind that, and I wanted to first get

854
00:55:29.440 --> 00:55:31.079
<v Speaker 5>the premise in this precondition.

855
00:55:31.199 --> 00:55:31.639
<v Speaker 4>So my.

856
00:55:33.360 --> 00:55:36.880
<v Speaker 5>My framework is more in line with how have you

857
00:55:36.960 --> 00:55:38.000
<v Speaker 5>familiar with Michael Kruger?

858
00:55:39.119 --> 00:55:41.000
<v Speaker 4>No, okay, uncle crue.

859
00:55:41.039 --> 00:55:43.079
<v Speaker 5>I got out a book called canon of the Deed

860
00:55:43.199 --> 00:55:45.400
<v Speaker 5>of the of the Bible based on.

861
00:55:47.760 --> 00:55:49.239
<v Speaker 14>I forgot the guy's name before.

862
00:55:49.079 --> 00:55:51.960
<v Speaker 5>But essentially he's he's making a model where he's talking

863
00:55:52.000 --> 00:55:57.119
<v Speaker 5>about a framework to view canonicity of scripture under a

864
00:55:57.199 --> 00:56:02.039
<v Speaker 5>self authenticating model, where can't where script itself like authenticates itself.

865
00:56:01.960 --> 00:56:04.719
<v Speaker 4>For it's infallibility.

866
00:56:06.000 --> 00:56:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I know the Orthodox position also has scripture and tradition I.

867
00:56:08.880 --> 00:56:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Believe, so.

868
00:56:12.400 --> 00:56:15.159
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to see if that if health thinking model

869
00:56:15.159 --> 00:56:19.199
<v Speaker 5>would be inherently contradictory logically.

870
00:56:20.920 --> 00:56:23.800
<v Speaker 9>I think it would be, because, for example, if the

871
00:56:24.480 --> 00:56:31.320
<v Speaker 9>notion of apostolic authorship is part of what we need

872
00:56:31.519 --> 00:56:35.320
<v Speaker 9>to know, for example, that Matthew wrote Matthew's Gospel. There's

873
00:56:35.400 --> 00:56:39.199
<v Speaker 9>nothing self authenticating within the other text that tells you that,

874
00:56:39.559 --> 00:56:41.280
<v Speaker 9>and that it should be included.

875
00:56:43.800 --> 00:56:48.320
<v Speaker 5>Nothink, So okay, okay, And then how does how does

876
00:56:48.400 --> 00:56:52.599
<v Speaker 5>the model like where you have the church authenticating the

877
00:56:52.679 --> 00:56:57.039
<v Speaker 5>model for canonicity subvert that, because then wouldn't that be

878
00:56:57.239 --> 00:56:59.880
<v Speaker 5>like a version of it, like a regression where people

879
00:56:59.920 --> 00:57:02.239
<v Speaker 5>can just argue, or there could be development of canon.

880
00:57:02.840 --> 00:57:05.840
<v Speaker 9>There was development of canon. That's why, for example, you

881
00:57:06.000 --> 00:57:11.159
<v Speaker 9>see competing canons for centuries until an ecumenical council in.

882
00:57:11.199 --> 00:57:13.159
<v Speaker 4>The Orthodox or Council of trend or even before that.

883
00:57:13.880 --> 00:57:17.119
<v Speaker 9>No, before that, I'm talking about the Council of Trello's

884
00:57:17.199 --> 00:57:20.400
<v Speaker 9>canons being affirmed at the Seventh Council. That's the Orthodox

885
00:57:20.960 --> 00:57:25.280
<v Speaker 9>perspective on when an ecumenical council makes a decision about

886
00:57:25.719 --> 00:57:29.199
<v Speaker 9>the normative canon for the for the church. That's universal.

887
00:57:29.679 --> 00:57:31.840
<v Speaker 9>So prior to that, you have a bunch of different

888
00:57:31.920 --> 00:57:34.599
<v Speaker 9>types of canons and competing lists. I'm scrolling down to

889
00:57:34.760 --> 00:57:38.000
<v Speaker 9>my posts on this the other day. And so for example,

890
00:57:38.039 --> 00:57:42.440
<v Speaker 9>you have it's not until the time of Athenacious that

891
00:57:42.559 --> 00:57:46.400
<v Speaker 9>you get the agreed upon New Testament canon that we

892
00:57:46.519 --> 00:57:51.199
<v Speaker 9>all as Protestants, Orthodox and Catholic agree on. But Athenasius,

893
00:57:51.280 --> 00:57:53.840
<v Speaker 9>if you read Lee McDonald's book, Who's a textual scholar,

894
00:57:54.159 --> 00:57:56.639
<v Speaker 9>a Baptist guy, he admits that Athenasius had to go

895
00:57:56.760 --> 00:57:59.599
<v Speaker 9>to Rome to convince Rome to include some of the

896
00:57:59.679 --> 00:58:03.079
<v Speaker 9>Catholic epistles and Revelation because Rome didn't even think that

897
00:58:03.320 --> 00:58:06.719
<v Speaker 9>revelation was authentic. So you notice, right there there's an

898
00:58:06.800 --> 00:58:12.480
<v Speaker 9>example of process and debate and Patristic tradition and argumentation

899
00:58:13.159 --> 00:58:17.360
<v Speaker 9>that is nothing to do with this idea of self authentication.

900
00:58:17.519 --> 00:58:20.599
<v Speaker 9>I mean, in other words, the idea that the canon

901
00:58:20.679 --> 00:58:24.800
<v Speaker 9>authenticates itself is negated by the actual formation of the canon,

902
00:58:24.920 --> 00:58:27.920
<v Speaker 9>the way that it actually happened, as admitted by the

903
00:58:28.000 --> 00:58:31.719
<v Speaker 9>Protestant scholars like F. F. Bruce or like Lee McDonnell.

904
00:58:32.280 --> 00:58:36.000
<v Speaker 9>So you have, for example, competing New Testament Old Testament

905
00:58:36.039 --> 00:58:40.079
<v Speaker 9>canons until Affinaceous posits in his Festal Letter what we

906
00:58:40.239 --> 00:58:42.639
<v Speaker 9>mostly think of as a New Testament canon, but the

907
00:58:42.920 --> 00:58:47.599
<v Speaker 9>prevalent Old Testament canon according to the Apostolic canons, Canon

908
00:58:47.639 --> 00:58:49.079
<v Speaker 9>eighty five. Are you familiar with that?

909
00:58:50.039 --> 00:58:50.239
<v Speaker 17>Yeah?

910
00:58:50.679 --> 00:58:54.280
<v Speaker 9>So Canon eighty five lists most of the deuterocanonical texts,

911
00:58:54.719 --> 00:58:58.719
<v Speaker 9>but it also doesn't have revelation and it includes Clement right.

912
00:59:01.920 --> 00:59:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Listed separately for the No, it does not or has

913
00:59:06.000 --> 00:59:08.679
<v Speaker 5>some other classifier for it where it says it's useful

914
00:59:08.719 --> 00:59:11.519
<v Speaker 5>but not not not inspired.

915
00:59:12.519 --> 00:59:16.960
<v Speaker 9>Remember, you might be thinking of Laodicea, but Canon eighty

916
00:59:17.000 --> 00:59:19.239
<v Speaker 9>five does not specify that. Let me pull it up.

917
00:59:19.280 --> 00:59:24.159
<v Speaker 9>We can make sure. Okay, let me let me. Let's

918
00:59:24.199 --> 00:59:25.880
<v Speaker 9>make sure. Let me pull it up for the sake

919
00:59:25.920 --> 00:59:29.920
<v Speaker 9>of the audience. Now, it is true that so I

920
00:59:29.960 --> 00:59:35.159
<v Speaker 9>can't see it, just adds up. That's fine. It is

921
00:59:35.239 --> 00:59:40.159
<v Speaker 9>true that there are some church father that state that

922
00:59:41.119 --> 00:59:44.119
<v Speaker 9>the Deutero canon is useful for catech humans, right, So

923
00:59:44.199 --> 00:59:48.119
<v Speaker 9>Athanasius says that, but that doesn't that also doesn't mean

924
00:59:48.159 --> 00:59:52.000
<v Speaker 9>that it's not inspired or that it's not useful for theology, right,

925
00:59:52.119 --> 00:59:54.400
<v Speaker 9>because why would you catechize people with it if it

926
00:59:54.480 --> 00:59:57.000
<v Speaker 9>wasn't use useful for theology. So the fact that it's

927
00:59:57.119 --> 01:00:02.679
<v Speaker 9>even called duetero canonical or secondary canons, there's no problem

928
01:00:02.760 --> 01:00:05.599
<v Speaker 9>for us in the Orthodox Church saying that here's the

929
01:00:05.639 --> 01:00:08.719
<v Speaker 9>Canon eighty five that was normative in the Eastern Church.

930
01:00:08.960 --> 01:00:11.679
<v Speaker 9>In this collection of Church law. This is from about

931
01:00:11.719 --> 01:00:13.760
<v Speaker 9>three hundred to four hundred a d. And it lists

932
01:00:15.119 --> 01:00:18.920
<v Speaker 9>it says five books of Moses, and then it says

933
01:00:19.039 --> 01:00:24.559
<v Speaker 9>Judges Joshua, Judges Ruth historical books. And then it says

934
01:00:25.320 --> 01:00:32.559
<v Speaker 9>Judith Maccabees. It says too, but so it includes judithan Maccabees,

935
01:00:32.920 --> 01:00:35.760
<v Speaker 9>and then it does not include Judith Maccabees amongst the

936
01:00:35.840 --> 01:00:38.920
<v Speaker 9>ones that it says are recommended for young people young people,

937
01:00:39.000 --> 01:00:45.199
<v Speaker 9>it says wisdom of syric So you notice that it's

938
01:00:45.320 --> 01:00:50.280
<v Speaker 9>not the Dutero canon that's secondary and for Catechisis it

939
01:00:50.480 --> 01:00:54.840
<v Speaker 9>just says wisdom is of syric is for catechisas, but

940
01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:59.119
<v Speaker 9>it includes Maccabees and the other duterocononical texts as part

941
01:00:59.159 --> 01:00:59.639
<v Speaker 9>of canon.

942
01:01:00.480 --> 01:01:03.519
<v Speaker 5>So that means there was when the ecumenical councils went

943
01:01:03.599 --> 01:01:05.920
<v Speaker 5>through any type of a theological position, they would use

944
01:01:06.119 --> 01:01:08.679
<v Speaker 5>tudor canonical books for a.

945
01:01:08.719 --> 01:01:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Defense or to make an argument.

946
01:01:15.159 --> 01:01:18.400
<v Speaker 9>I know that many church fathers cite Dutero canonical texts

947
01:01:18.719 --> 01:01:20.280
<v Speaker 9>for theological argumentation.

948
01:01:20.400 --> 01:01:22.079
<v Speaker 4>Do you know if any of the College of Patriots

949
01:01:22.119 --> 01:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>would use it. I'm just I'm trying to go for

950
01:01:24.119 --> 01:01:25.119
<v Speaker 4>more reference.

951
01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:28.599
<v Speaker 9>Off the top of my head. I'm not sure of

952
01:01:28.800 --> 01:01:34.480
<v Speaker 9>a ecumenical council citing Dutero canonical text, but ultimately it's

953
01:01:34.519 --> 01:01:36.719
<v Speaker 9>not going to matter because what I'm arguing is that

954
01:01:37.719 --> 01:01:42.559
<v Speaker 9>the councils of Carthage that include the duterocanonical text, which

955
01:01:42.639 --> 01:01:48.960
<v Speaker 9>is identical to the local Romance Roman synod Counts canon,

956
01:01:49.039 --> 01:01:52.000
<v Speaker 9>which is what Damasist is called the canon of Damasist,

957
01:01:52.039 --> 01:01:56.000
<v Speaker 9>which is why Augustine posites his canon. That's the Carthaginian

958
01:01:56.119 --> 01:02:00.320
<v Speaker 9>Western Latin canon that includes the Dutero canon without any distinction.

959
01:02:01.280 --> 01:02:04.639
<v Speaker 9>And what I'm saying is that the Trollo Quinessex Council

960
01:02:04.719 --> 01:02:08.159
<v Speaker 9>happens later on in the East, which affirms the Carthage canon,

961
01:02:08.960 --> 01:02:13.639
<v Speaker 9>and then the Seventh Ecumenical Council for the Orthodox affirms

962
01:02:13.960 --> 01:02:19.400
<v Speaker 9>Trollo and Carthage on this issue. So does that make sense?

963
01:02:19.480 --> 01:02:20.360
<v Speaker 9>That's our perspective.

964
01:02:21.119 --> 01:02:23.199
<v Speaker 4>Awesome, Okay, I got everything I need. I got to

965
01:02:23.199 --> 01:02:26.199
<v Speaker 4>do more reading on So thank you man you brought me.

966
01:02:26.280 --> 01:02:29.360
<v Speaker 9>Those are great questions and I'm always happy to kind

967
01:02:29.400 --> 01:02:33.960
<v Speaker 9>of go through that logic process there because a lot

968
01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:38.199
<v Speaker 9>of people are not familiar with these topics. Now, keep

969
01:02:38.239 --> 01:02:42.519
<v Speaker 9>in mind, too, there are other earlier canon lists like

970
01:02:42.840 --> 01:02:49.440
<v Speaker 9>that one one of the earliest ones that James White

971
01:02:53.159 --> 01:02:55.800
<v Speaker 9>brings up in the Trent debate, and he ended up

972
01:02:55.800 --> 01:03:00.159
<v Speaker 9>getting humiliated over this because he got it wrong. And

973
01:03:00.679 --> 01:03:03.559
<v Speaker 9>I think it's the of Vicentian canon. Let's see here,

974
01:03:04.599 --> 01:03:07.480
<v Speaker 9>or I'm a human LDO of artists, let's see. Yeah,

975
01:03:07.519 --> 01:03:11.800
<v Speaker 9>So let's watch this because Sam Schimun calls out James

976
01:03:11.880 --> 01:03:16.239
<v Speaker 9>White after the trent Horn debate on this very topic,

977
01:03:16.480 --> 01:03:20.840
<v Speaker 9>because in the Trent Horn White debate, White says, oh,

978
01:03:21.679 --> 01:03:26.239
<v Speaker 9>there's a canon you know list, that's the Protestant canon

979
01:03:26.320 --> 01:03:31.400
<v Speaker 9>list the Old Testament early on with Meledo. But wait

980
01:03:31.440 --> 01:03:37.519
<v Speaker 9>a minute, Meledo includes what White doesn't believe, so it

981
01:03:37.639 --> 01:03:41.840
<v Speaker 9>was just wrong. He's so excited to Stary Gema take.

982
01:03:43.239 --> 01:03:43.559
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

983
01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:50.239
<v Speaker 16>Of Chronicles too, the Songs of David, the Proverbs of Solomon, Wisdom,

984
01:03:50.920 --> 01:03:58.320
<v Speaker 16>also Ecclesiastes Song of Songs.

985
01:03:58.719 --> 01:04:02.360
<v Speaker 9>So you understand this is James White arguing against Trent

986
01:04:02.440 --> 01:04:07.559
<v Speaker 9>Horn that the Protestant Old Testament cannon is there early on,

987
01:04:08.840 --> 01:04:12.880
<v Speaker 9>and it's I think it's Meldo's canon. Let's make sure

988
01:04:14.960 --> 01:04:23.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah takes it okay too. Meldo's canon is not the

989
01:04:23.119 --> 01:04:26.400
<v Speaker 9>James White Protestant canon. So he just was wrong, and

990
01:04:27.280 --> 01:04:28.159
<v Speaker 9>James White doesn't care.

991
01:04:28.360 --> 01:04:33.920
<v Speaker 16>The songs of David, the proverbs of Solomon wisdom also

992
01:04:38.400 --> 01:04:40.960
<v Speaker 16>Ecclesiastes song of Songs.

993
01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:41.599
<v Speaker 4>Job.

994
01:04:45.800 --> 01:04:50.159
<v Speaker 16>You remember he said this is the accurate canon. He

995
01:04:50.360 --> 01:04:58.000
<v Speaker 16>got the accurate canon. He learned the accurate cannon, which

996
01:04:58.159 --> 01:05:03.719
<v Speaker 16>means the Jews accepted the wisdom of Solomon as inspired scripture.

997
01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:08.599
<v Speaker 16>See how you just buried himself. Some wan should make

998
01:05:08.639 --> 01:05:12.800
<v Speaker 16>a clip out of this. He kept saying, accurate, this

999
01:05:12.960 --> 01:05:13.519
<v Speaker 16>is accurate.

1000
01:05:13.760 --> 01:05:14.760
<v Speaker 9>This is what they believe.

1001
01:05:15.199 --> 01:05:18.519
<v Speaker 16>You just buried yourself, dude, because they accepted wisdom of

1002
01:05:18.599 --> 01:05:24.360
<v Speaker 16>Solomon as part of their Old Testament as accurate canon,

1003
01:05:25.239 --> 01:05:34.079
<v Speaker 16>and they accepted a scripture. Please gets a little better.

1004
01:05:35.239 --> 01:05:38.239
<v Speaker 16>See that dis honesty of this man. Now watch here,

1005
01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:44.079
<v Speaker 16>guess what is not included? Guess what is not included?

1006
01:05:45.719 --> 01:05:51.320
<v Speaker 16>Pay attention of prophets Isaiah Jeremiah of the twelve Prophets,

1007
01:05:51.400 --> 01:05:57.320
<v Speaker 16>one book Daniel Ezekiel Estras. Now some will say Estras

1008
01:05:57.400 --> 01:06:04.840
<v Speaker 16>means Ezra Nehemiah, Thehemaiah. They're combined as one from which

1009
01:06:04.960 --> 01:06:07.480
<v Speaker 16>also I've made dix tracks dividing them into six books.

1010
01:06:07.880 --> 01:06:11.440
<v Speaker 16>Such are the words of Malito. Guess what he didn't find, folks,

1011
01:06:12.400 --> 01:06:17.239
<v Speaker 16>he didn't find Esther. Esther was not in their canon.

1012
01:06:17.440 --> 01:06:20.400
<v Speaker 14>So I say this, here's what I say.

1013
01:06:21.480 --> 01:06:24.079
<v Speaker 4>Watch your watch your.

1014
01:06:25.880 --> 01:06:30.000
<v Speaker 16>Note that Malito includes the Big of Wisdom as part

1015
01:06:30.039 --> 01:06:33.320
<v Speaker 16>of the Old testing canon and does not include Esther.

1016
01:06:34.519 --> 01:06:38.159
<v Speaker 16>This means that the accurate canonical list of books omit

1017
01:06:38.400 --> 01:06:44.039
<v Speaker 16>a book accepted by Jamila and include alrighty rejected by Jimmy.

1018
01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:50.519
<v Speaker 9>So there you go. James White owned himself in the

1019
01:06:50.599 --> 01:06:54.039
<v Speaker 9>trent Horn debate by claiming that Melido of Artists had

1020
01:06:54.039 --> 01:06:56.239
<v Speaker 9>the correct canon. He didn't even go and check to

1021
01:06:56.320 --> 01:06:59.519
<v Speaker 9>see that it wasn't the Protestant canon for the Old Testament.

1022
01:07:00.639 --> 01:07:05.360
<v Speaker 9>So hopefully again that's more AMO. But I also hope

1023
01:07:05.400 --> 01:07:09.880
<v Speaker 9>it demonstrates the point that we were making earlier that

1024
01:07:10.920 --> 01:07:14.039
<v Speaker 9>the canon isn't self authenticating because it doesn't even make sense.

1025
01:07:14.079 --> 01:07:20.239
<v Speaker 9>And that's completely divorced from even the Protestant scholars who've

1026
01:07:20.280 --> 01:07:24.079
<v Speaker 9>written books on the process of the canon. When you

1027
01:07:24.199 --> 01:07:27.679
<v Speaker 9>read this process and how much debate there was to

1028
01:07:27.800 --> 01:07:30.000
<v Speaker 9>then say, oh, but actually none of that was the case.

1029
01:07:30.039 --> 01:07:32.159
<v Speaker 9>It was all just self authenticating, right, It's just kind

1030
01:07:32.159 --> 01:07:46.880
<v Speaker 9>of like absurd christ supremacist. I hope these Protestants in

1031
01:07:46.960 --> 01:07:49.599
<v Speaker 9>the YouTube chat are going to call in with all

1032
01:07:49.639 --> 01:07:52.320
<v Speaker 9>this yappen? Are you there?

1033
01:07:52.400 --> 01:07:52.519
<v Speaker 10>Man?

1034
01:07:52.519 --> 01:07:57.360
<v Speaker 9>You gotta mute or what? Guys? If you want to

1035
01:07:57.400 --> 01:08:00.159
<v Speaker 9>come on, you got to have your microphone capabilities turned on.

1036
01:08:00.360 --> 01:08:03.320
<v Speaker 9>I don't like there's no one done a space before

1037
01:08:03.360 --> 01:08:06.199
<v Speaker 9>on us on or something unism. You want to try again.

1038
01:08:08.320 --> 01:08:14.280
<v Speaker 9>Remember we're not doing cticcumen questions today. This is for Protestants, Catholics, Muslims.

1039
01:08:14.280 --> 01:08:14.880
<v Speaker 9>I disagree.

1040
01:08:16.720 --> 01:08:18.199
<v Speaker 4>Hey Jay, how's it going good?

1041
01:08:18.239 --> 01:08:18.960
<v Speaker 9>What's on your mind?

1042
01:08:20.640 --> 01:08:22.239
<v Speaker 23>Thanks for having me on the show. First of all,

1043
01:08:22.319 --> 01:08:24.560
<v Speaker 23>I might be one of those ignorant Protestants you were

1044
01:08:24.640 --> 01:08:27.880
<v Speaker 23>talking about a minute ago, so I do apologize. I

1045
01:08:27.920 --> 01:08:29.520
<v Speaker 23>gotta say though I'm a big fan of the show.

1046
01:08:29.560 --> 01:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate what you do.

1047
01:08:31.119 --> 01:08:33.720
<v Speaker 23>So I don't know that I'm qualified to speak with you,

1048
01:08:34.359 --> 01:08:36.000
<v Speaker 23>but I just want to come on the show and

1049
01:08:36.399 --> 01:08:38.840
<v Speaker 23>kind of talk about something like that you're talking to

1050
01:08:38.920 --> 01:08:45.199
<v Speaker 23>the last speaker about, Okay, specifically that I understand that

1051
01:08:45.439 --> 01:08:50.199
<v Speaker 23>the canon may not be self authenticating as such, or

1052
01:08:50.319 --> 01:08:52.840
<v Speaker 23>like you were just saying, like it's important the work

1053
01:08:52.920 --> 01:08:55.960
<v Speaker 23>that the early Church fathers and counsels had to go

1054
01:08:56.199 --> 01:09:00.680
<v Speaker 23>through to establish the canon was necessary. We can all

1055
01:09:00.760 --> 01:09:03.840
<v Speaker 23>agree on that. But it's maybe, and I hope I

1056
01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:07.600
<v Speaker 23>can express this or articulate this correctly. It's not as

1057
01:09:07.680 --> 01:09:14.000
<v Speaker 23>though because they decided that that's the canon, that that

1058
01:09:14.319 --> 01:09:18.479
<v Speaker 23>power is in them, they more or less did the

1059
01:09:18.640 --> 01:09:22.199
<v Speaker 23>leg work that allows us to look back and say, yes,

1060
01:09:22.319 --> 01:09:25.680
<v Speaker 23>they did make the correct decisions in establishing the canon.

1061
01:09:25.840 --> 01:09:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1062
01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:30.239
<v Speaker 9>But the thing is that for Protestantism, classical Protestantism, no

1063
01:09:30.560 --> 01:09:36.680
<v Speaker 9>post Apostolic writing or teaching is binding necessary and can

1064
01:09:36.800 --> 01:09:39.199
<v Speaker 9>bind your conscience. And so if you're a Protestant and

1065
01:09:39.239 --> 01:09:42.439
<v Speaker 9>you believe Classical Reformation doctrine a freedom of conscience and

1066
01:09:42.520 --> 01:09:46.199
<v Speaker 9>right to private interpretation, there's nothing stopping you from creating

1067
01:09:46.279 --> 01:09:49.239
<v Speaker 9>your own private canon that you prayed about and that

1068
01:09:49.319 --> 01:09:50.239
<v Speaker 9>the Holy Spirit led.

1069
01:09:50.119 --> 01:09:50.439
<v Speaker 4>You to have.

1070
01:09:51.039 --> 01:09:54.319
<v Speaker 9>So you see how That's why it's I agree with

1071
01:09:54.439 --> 01:09:57.960
<v Speaker 9>you that when the church fathers are quote, recognizing what's canonical,

1072
01:09:58.119 --> 01:10:02.520
<v Speaker 9>they're not making it inspired. They're recognizing what is inspired.

1073
01:10:02.880 --> 01:10:06.520
<v Speaker 9>But they're also given the authority to bind and to loose,

1074
01:10:07.079 --> 01:10:09.840
<v Speaker 9>and thus can bind you to the decision of what

1075
01:10:10.079 --> 01:10:14.000
<v Speaker 9>is canonical versus what is not. And that's a normative claim.

1076
01:10:14.039 --> 01:10:17.479
<v Speaker 9>That's normativity in terms of ethics versus the question of

1077
01:10:18.079 --> 01:10:22.079
<v Speaker 9>individual discovery of certitude or inspiration or whatever. That's a

1078
01:10:22.159 --> 01:10:26.039
<v Speaker 9>separate question from like the Supreme Court. Does the Supreme

1079
01:10:26.119 --> 01:10:28.600
<v Speaker 9>Court have the right to or to bind people to

1080
01:10:28.840 --> 01:10:32.560
<v Speaker 9>the interpretation of the Constitution. We're saying Jesus gave to

1081
01:10:32.800 --> 01:10:36.880
<v Speaker 9>his institutional body, the Church, the ability to bind people

1082
01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:38.159
<v Speaker 9>to these decisions.

1083
01:10:39.800 --> 01:10:41.840
<v Speaker 23>I think that's well said, and I think that's a

1084
01:10:41.880 --> 01:10:46.239
<v Speaker 23>perfect metaphor of a Supreme Court. In some sense, though,

1085
01:10:46.319 --> 01:10:48.239
<v Speaker 23>if we had a Supreme let's let's say we had

1086
01:10:48.279 --> 01:10:51.039
<v Speaker 23>a rogue Supreme Court under Biden. He put in, like,

1087
01:10:51.279 --> 01:10:55.560
<v Speaker 23>you know, six or seven crazy Supreme Court people, we

1088
01:10:55.600 --> 01:10:58.880
<v Speaker 23>would still know that the Constitution itself is what we

1089
01:10:59.039 --> 01:11:03.039
<v Speaker 23>hold to. And the errancy, let's say, of the Supreme

1090
01:11:03.159 --> 01:11:05.800
<v Speaker 23>Court tells us that they're not.

1091
01:11:07.319 --> 01:11:07.479
<v Speaker 9>Right.

1092
01:11:07.479 --> 01:11:10.399
<v Speaker 23>You know, in some sense, I'm saying, you know, let's

1093
01:11:10.399 --> 01:11:13.760
<v Speaker 23>speak purely about the Catholic Church, right popes that put

1094
01:11:13.800 --> 01:11:18.960
<v Speaker 23>into different councils or bulls or whatever that you know,

1095
01:11:19.079 --> 01:11:21.279
<v Speaker 23>the lady should not read the scripture, or they shouldn't

1096
01:11:21.319 --> 01:11:24.359
<v Speaker 23>read it without the clergy, or it shouldn't be translated

1097
01:11:24.439 --> 01:11:28.640
<v Speaker 23>into the common parlance or whatever. Partisans look at that

1098
01:11:28.680 --> 01:11:32.119
<v Speaker 23>and say, okay, well, clearly this is against what this

1099
01:11:32.279 --> 01:11:35.640
<v Speaker 23>is against what the scriptures are about. And so in

1100
01:11:35.760 --> 01:11:39.399
<v Speaker 23>some sense that I would say, not entirely undermines the

1101
01:11:39.479 --> 01:11:43.039
<v Speaker 23>idea of apostolic succession, but it at least says, what's

1102
01:11:43.119 --> 01:11:44.319
<v Speaker 23>more important than.

1103
01:11:44.279 --> 01:11:48.079
<v Speaker 9>The change, Right, I understand where you're going with this.

1104
01:11:48.279 --> 01:11:52.199
<v Speaker 9>It undermines the notion of papal authority, which is a

1105
01:11:52.319 --> 01:11:56.359
<v Speaker 9>different principle of unity and authority than the Protestant except

1106
01:11:56.439 --> 01:12:01.159
<v Speaker 9>that actually, with Protestantism it's the individual this private interpretation.

1107
01:12:01.479 --> 01:12:05.479
<v Speaker 9>With Catholicism, it's the papacy telling you. And the unique

1108
01:12:05.479 --> 01:12:09.479
<v Speaker 9>position of the Orthodox Church is that it's communal and sinodal.

1109
01:12:10.039 --> 01:12:13.239
<v Speaker 9>And we would argue that we are the actual historical church.

1110
01:12:13.319 --> 01:12:15.560
<v Speaker 9>When there's an issue that comes up in Acts fifteen,

1111
01:12:15.720 --> 01:12:18.760
<v Speaker 9>it's a synod. It's not one guy being an autocrat.

1112
01:12:18.880 --> 01:12:21.600
<v Speaker 9>It's a synod. And we'd argue that if you look

1113
01:12:21.600 --> 01:12:24.119
<v Speaker 9>at the promises that Jesus makes to the church, he says,

1114
01:12:24.199 --> 01:12:26.880
<v Speaker 9>I will send you the Spirit the Helper, I will

1115
01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:29.760
<v Speaker 9>never leave you, I will not forsake you. I will

1116
01:12:29.800 --> 01:12:31.640
<v Speaker 9>be with you until the end of the age, the

1117
01:12:31.720 --> 01:12:34.880
<v Speaker 9>spirit will guide you into all truth. That's a promise

1118
01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:38.119
<v Speaker 9>made to the actual college of the apostles, not just

1119
01:12:38.199 --> 01:12:41.640
<v Speaker 9>a Peter, but the whole college. And so their successor

1120
01:12:41.720 --> 01:12:46.000
<v Speaker 9>is not in any individual person, but in their collective body.

1121
01:12:46.079 --> 01:12:49.720
<v Speaker 9>In college cannot fall away. So the Orthodox conception of

1122
01:12:49.840 --> 01:12:52.359
<v Speaker 9>the Church not being able to fall away is a

1123
01:12:52.960 --> 01:12:58.720
<v Speaker 9>collective idea, not individual bishops being exempted from this warning.

1124
01:12:59.279 --> 01:13:01.680
<v Speaker 9>And so no, we would not say that the Bishop

1125
01:13:01.720 --> 01:13:06.760
<v Speaker 9>of Rome has sole title to this promise of not

1126
01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:10.399
<v Speaker 9>falling away. Right, Jesus promises to the whole college, to

1127
01:13:10.520 --> 01:13:14.640
<v Speaker 9>the whole body. But yes, absolutely a bishop, a group

1128
01:13:14.680 --> 01:13:17.479
<v Speaker 9>of bishops can fall away, but never the entire collective

1129
01:13:18.119 --> 01:13:20.159
<v Speaker 9>institution of the bishops themselves.

1130
01:13:20.239 --> 01:13:25.039
<v Speaker 23>No, well said, Well said, well, what do you say

1131
01:13:25.079 --> 01:13:27.159
<v Speaker 23>about Galatians one to one where? And I know this

1132
01:13:27.319 --> 01:13:31.560
<v Speaker 23>is obviously apostolic times. So when Paul says Paul, I

1133
01:13:31.800 --> 01:13:35.880
<v Speaker 23>Paul an apostle, not from men nor through man, but

1134
01:13:36.039 --> 01:13:39.319
<v Speaker 23>through Jesus Christ and God the Father, in some sense,

1135
01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:41.600
<v Speaker 23>I do look at Paul. You maybe heard this before,

1136
01:13:41.640 --> 01:13:45.039
<v Speaker 23>but like Paul is someone who wasn't walking with Jesus

1137
01:13:45.199 --> 01:13:49.560
<v Speaker 23>during Jesus's ministry. He's almost the prototype of every believer

1138
01:13:49.720 --> 01:13:54.399
<v Speaker 23>that comes after Jesus's time, Right, he wasn't obviously he

1139
01:13:54.479 --> 01:13:56.560
<v Speaker 23>saw Jesus, but he wasn't walking with him.

1140
01:13:56.920 --> 01:13:59.039
<v Speaker 2>He's like the prototype believer.

1141
01:13:59.439 --> 01:14:01.960
<v Speaker 9>For well, I mean we can say that, we can

1142
01:14:02.079 --> 01:14:05.399
<v Speaker 9>say that any person in the Bible is in some way,

1143
01:14:06.119 --> 01:14:08.840
<v Speaker 9>perhaps any faithful person in the Bible is in some

1144
01:14:08.960 --> 01:14:12.039
<v Speaker 9>way a prototype of a believer. I mean, even Rahab

1145
01:14:12.119 --> 01:14:15.199
<v Speaker 9>the harlot is a prototype of a gentile believer, according

1146
01:14:15.239 --> 01:14:18.119
<v Speaker 9>to you know, the Church fathers. But that doesn't it

1147
01:14:18.199 --> 01:14:21.439
<v Speaker 9>doesn't follow from that that every office that they possess

1148
01:14:21.720 --> 01:14:24.640
<v Speaker 9>thus then transfers over to every future believer. Right, So

1149
01:14:24.800 --> 01:14:29.199
<v Speaker 9>I'm not a member of the episcopate, so not everything

1150
01:14:29.239 --> 01:14:33.319
<v Speaker 9>that occurs in the church that is for a member

1151
01:14:33.319 --> 01:14:36.000
<v Speaker 9>of the episcopate applies to me. And no, we would

1152
01:14:36.039 --> 01:14:39.079
<v Speaker 9>say that there's twelve apostles, and if you look at

1153
01:14:39.800 --> 01:14:44.159
<v Speaker 9>the church, for example, the Book of Revelation, it's a

1154
01:14:44.359 --> 01:14:48.800
<v Speaker 9>giant city with twelve foundation stones, with twelve apostles names

1155
01:14:48.920 --> 01:14:53.319
<v Speaker 9>on those foundation stones. So you must be specifically a

1156
01:14:53.399 --> 01:14:56.680
<v Speaker 9>member of that twelve to be what Jesus calls the

1157
01:14:56.960 --> 01:14:59.520
<v Speaker 9>princes of the Church calls you he says, you will

1158
01:14:59.600 --> 01:15:02.479
<v Speaker 9>judge the twelve tribes of Israel when you get when

1159
01:15:02.520 --> 01:15:05.800
<v Speaker 9>he is in the upper room talking to them, And

1160
01:15:05.960 --> 01:15:08.560
<v Speaker 9>we would say that that means that they're they're the

1161
01:15:08.680 --> 01:15:12.319
<v Speaker 9>foundation stone. So that's a unique role. And Paul was

1162
01:15:12.399 --> 01:15:15.000
<v Speaker 9>called to that apostleship, but not everybody in the church.

1163
01:15:15.159 --> 01:15:16.319
<v Speaker 9>It has the role of being Paul.

1164
01:15:17.479 --> 01:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>No, No, clearly, not clearly not. What about this? Maybe

1165
01:15:21.039 --> 01:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I can pose this not so much as maybe I

1166
01:15:24.680 --> 01:15:26.079
<v Speaker 2>can kind of post this as a question.

1167
01:15:27.039 --> 01:15:31.239
<v Speaker 23>In Mark seven to eight crists you leave the commandment

1168
01:15:31.359 --> 01:15:34.760
<v Speaker 23>of God and hold to the tradition of men. Now,

1169
01:15:34.800 --> 01:15:37.960
<v Speaker 23>I don't throw that out to say that that's what

1170
01:15:38.039 --> 01:15:39.840
<v Speaker 23>we're talking about, but I more so to say in

1171
01:15:40.680 --> 01:15:42.680
<v Speaker 23>is there any sense in which you look at the

1172
01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:46.880
<v Speaker 23>Eastern Orthodox Church today and say there are places, not

1173
01:15:47.079 --> 01:15:50.479
<v Speaker 23>in terms of solar scripture or whatever, but just maybe

1174
01:15:50.560 --> 01:15:53.800
<v Speaker 23>more broadly in which they're holding more to the tradition

1175
01:15:53.960 --> 01:15:56.439
<v Speaker 23>of men rather than the commandment of God.

1176
01:15:56.920 --> 01:15:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Is there any Oh?

1177
01:15:58.039 --> 01:16:01.039
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, no, So I think Phariseeism and legalism could be

1178
01:16:01.640 --> 01:16:07.439
<v Speaker 9>present anywhere. You know, Jesus in fact warns the disciples themselves, right,

1179
01:16:07.680 --> 01:16:12.039
<v Speaker 9>the very foundation stones of the church are warned about

1180
01:16:12.039 --> 01:16:15.680
<v Speaker 9>the possibility of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is

1181
01:16:15.840 --> 01:16:20.199
<v Speaker 9>self righteousness, and uh, you know, majoring on the miners,

1182
01:16:20.279 --> 01:16:23.520
<v Speaker 9>obsessing over minutia versus the bigger issues, the weightier matters

1183
01:16:23.560 --> 01:16:26.359
<v Speaker 9>of the law. That could happen to anybody anywhere. You

1184
01:16:26.439 --> 01:16:28.920
<v Speaker 9>could be in a monastics situation and you could have

1185
01:16:30.239 --> 01:16:33.399
<v Speaker 9>you know, pharisaic legalism in the monastic realm. You could

1186
01:16:33.399 --> 01:16:36.840
<v Speaker 9>have people getting pharasaical about the you know, fasting in

1187
01:16:36.880 --> 01:16:39.439
<v Speaker 9>the church that happens all the time. People get pharisaical

1188
01:16:39.479 --> 01:16:43.199
<v Speaker 9>about you know, calendar dates and issues in the Orthodox Church.

1189
01:16:43.279 --> 01:16:46.560
<v Speaker 9>That happens all the time. So absolutely, yeah, But even

1190
01:16:47.479 --> 01:16:51.319
<v Speaker 9>that happening in you know, various localized places or settings,

1191
01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:02.239
<v Speaker 9>even that that doesn't destroy the collective promise to the church. Nick, Nick, mh,

1192
01:17:02.359 --> 01:17:12.880
<v Speaker 9>what's up? Yeah, I'm you. I would add two that

1193
01:17:13.119 --> 01:17:16.039
<v Speaker 9>that same section you're talking about Mark, but in Matthew,

1194
01:17:16.079 --> 01:17:19.359
<v Speaker 9>it's Matthew twenty three when he's rebuking the Pharisees. Even

1195
01:17:19.399 --> 01:17:22.600
<v Speaker 9>there he appeals to tradition. Go ahead, and now what's up.

1196
01:17:26.039 --> 01:17:26.359
<v Speaker 4>You there?

1197
01:17:30.800 --> 01:17:32.359
<v Speaker 9>Nick? Yeah, what's up?

1198
01:17:36.279 --> 01:17:36.600
<v Speaker 7>My bad?

1199
01:17:36.600 --> 01:17:38.159
<v Speaker 9>I was having some trouble.

1200
01:17:39.279 --> 01:17:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, if the background is.

1201
01:17:40.399 --> 01:17:42.079
<v Speaker 4>Too loud to just kick me or whatnot.

1202
01:17:43.079 --> 01:17:47.560
<v Speaker 24>So I'm I'm a Protestant right now, but I'm looking

1203
01:17:47.760 --> 01:17:51.079
<v Speaker 24>into the Orthodox rash and I kind of got some questions.

1204
01:17:51.880 --> 01:17:54.920
<v Speaker 24>I ran across some crazy interpretations in the past, and

1205
01:17:55.159 --> 01:17:55.880
<v Speaker 24>this would.

1206
01:17:57.399 --> 01:17:59.720
<v Speaker 4>There's a guy named Johnny Chang. I don't know if

1207
01:17:59.720 --> 01:18:00.439
<v Speaker 4>you ever heard of him.

1208
01:18:03.000 --> 01:18:05.239
<v Speaker 24>He's just he has a whole bunch of followers and

1209
01:18:05.479 --> 01:18:07.000
<v Speaker 24>has a really good testimony.

1210
01:18:07.079 --> 01:18:07.760
<v Speaker 19>But he.

1211
01:18:09.840 --> 01:18:11.920
<v Speaker 9>Made a question about the Lord's prayer.

1212
01:18:12.119 --> 01:18:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I kind of wanted to see what you would say

1213
01:18:13.640 --> 01:18:13.960
<v Speaker 4>about it.

1214
01:18:14.479 --> 01:18:16.479
<v Speaker 24>He said that we don't have to pray the Lord's

1215
01:18:16.520 --> 01:18:21.560
<v Speaker 24>prayer because it was a past tense prayer, Like how

1216
01:18:21.640 --> 01:18:22.199
<v Speaker 24>it says.

1217
01:18:22.039 --> 01:18:24.760
<v Speaker 9>Like that Kingdom come, that will be done, that like

1218
01:18:25.119 --> 01:18:26.039
<v Speaker 9>the will of the.

1219
01:18:26.079 --> 01:18:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Father already came in the kingdom. So I kind of

1220
01:18:28.640 --> 01:18:30.079
<v Speaker 4>want to see what your input is on that.

1221
01:18:31.079 --> 01:18:33.840
<v Speaker 9>Uh No, I mean, Jesus says pray in this wise,

1222
01:18:34.159 --> 01:18:36.439
<v Speaker 9>So if it was a past tense thing, he wouldn't

1223
01:18:36.439 --> 01:18:40.399
<v Speaker 9>have said told him to pray in this way. Every

1224
01:18:40.520 --> 01:18:45.319
<v Speaker 9>church in history has prayed the Our Father and the

1225
01:18:45.439 --> 01:18:48.199
<v Speaker 9>Kingdom of God is not just a present reality, it's

1226
01:18:48.279 --> 01:18:51.960
<v Speaker 9>also an eschatological reality. This is called already not yet

1227
01:18:52.039 --> 01:18:55.920
<v Speaker 9>in the theological language. So Jesus brought the eschatological reality

1228
01:18:55.960 --> 01:18:58.000
<v Speaker 9>of the kingdom now, which is in the Divine Liturgy.

1229
01:18:58.439 --> 01:19:03.279
<v Speaker 9>That's a foretaste of it. But the final full sense

1230
01:19:03.359 --> 01:19:06.680
<v Speaker 9>of the eschological reality is at the Second Coming. So

1231
01:19:06.760 --> 01:19:12.159
<v Speaker 9>it's a both and Jonathan Bursea, but good questions and

1232
01:19:12.239 --> 01:19:14.319
<v Speaker 9>tell Johnny Chang or whatever his name is, tell them

1233
01:19:14.359 --> 01:19:15.600
<v Speaker 9>to come in here, give them the link and tell

1234
01:19:15.640 --> 01:19:18.880
<v Speaker 9>them to come come chat. I just boot these people

1235
01:19:18.920 --> 01:19:22.359
<v Speaker 9>who are like spamming. If they don't, if they won't

1236
01:19:22.399 --> 01:19:23.920
<v Speaker 9>come to bay, just get them out of here. They're

1237
01:19:23.960 --> 01:19:27.600
<v Speaker 9>just wasting everybody's time. Nobody's going to convert from your

1238
01:19:27.720 --> 01:19:32.039
<v Speaker 9>Protestants spamming the chat. And I've been hearing your arguments

1239
01:19:32.119 --> 01:19:32.800
<v Speaker 9>for twenty years.

1240
01:19:33.039 --> 01:19:34.000
<v Speaker 14>I know, I know.

1241
01:19:34.960 --> 01:19:35.800
<v Speaker 9>Go ahead, man, what's up?

1242
01:19:37.279 --> 01:19:40.399
<v Speaker 25>Hey, I'm a first time calling in and I got

1243
01:19:40.439 --> 01:19:41.279
<v Speaker 25>a weird question for you.

1244
01:19:41.640 --> 01:19:41.880
<v Speaker 9>Okay.

1245
01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:46.399
<v Speaker 25>I used to be Protestant. Nine years ago I left

1246
01:19:46.439 --> 01:19:48.319
<v Speaker 25>the church because of what I'm going to describe you.

1247
01:19:50.119 --> 01:19:51.600
<v Speaker 25>I went to one of the leaders of my church,

1248
01:19:51.680 --> 01:19:55.800
<v Speaker 25>pastor and a deacon, because I had questions about why

1249
01:19:56.039 --> 01:20:00.720
<v Speaker 25>there were women pastors in the church, and they basically

1250
01:20:00.840 --> 01:20:03.119
<v Speaker 25>said I was too legalistic and I needed to go

1251
01:20:03.279 --> 01:20:08.680
<v Speaker 25>reread acts about Peter's dream, and they kind of ignored

1252
01:20:08.760 --> 01:20:09.279
<v Speaker 25>me after that.

1253
01:20:10.399 --> 01:20:15.039
<v Speaker 9>What would Peter? So the analogy is that Peter's dream

1254
01:20:15.279 --> 01:20:18.399
<v Speaker 9>was a change of dietary law. So now we have

1255
01:20:19.239 --> 01:20:21.920
<v Speaker 9>the dream of women pastors. So that's I mean, that's

1256
01:20:22.279 --> 01:20:23.159
<v Speaker 9>is that what they arguing?

1257
01:20:24.640 --> 01:20:26.640
<v Speaker 25>Yeah, that's kind of the sense that I got. Like,

1258
01:20:27.079 --> 01:20:30.680
<v Speaker 25>my my viewpoint was like, he's the dreams or vision

1259
01:20:30.800 --> 01:20:33.560
<v Speaker 25>is only about like food. It's not about like women

1260
01:20:33.640 --> 01:20:37.600
<v Speaker 25>pastors or homosexuality of the church or anything. So what

1261
01:20:38.520 --> 01:20:41.199
<v Speaker 25>what would you say if somebody like clapped back at

1262
01:20:41.199 --> 01:20:41.520
<v Speaker 25>you with that.

1263
01:20:42.600 --> 01:20:45.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, like we'd explained in the Mormon's dream the other night,

1264
01:20:46.800 --> 01:20:50.279
<v Speaker 9>there's a finality to divine revelation first and foremost, So

1265
01:20:50.479 --> 01:20:53.920
<v Speaker 9>when the last apostle died, there are no no new

1266
01:20:54.039 --> 01:21:00.840
<v Speaker 9>divine revelations in the sense of public theological binding ideas

1267
01:21:01.800 --> 01:21:05.439
<v Speaker 9>any for us, any say, Ecumenical Council of the Orthodox Church.

1268
01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:09.119
<v Speaker 9>It's not a new divine revelation. It's really just specifying

1269
01:21:09.199 --> 01:21:12.840
<v Speaker 9>and explicating what the Church has already taught in its

1270
01:21:12.880 --> 01:21:17.319
<v Speaker 9>apostolic deposits. So, for example, Zecharai thirteen Daniel nine twenty

1271
01:21:17.399 --> 01:21:23.399
<v Speaker 9>four Jude three Glatians one. You look at those passages

1272
01:21:23.520 --> 01:21:26.960
<v Speaker 9>and you see that there is a finality to what

1273
01:21:27.079 --> 01:21:31.479
<v Speaker 9>we call revelation, and that right there cuts off any

1274
01:21:31.880 --> 01:21:36.560
<v Speaker 9>cult claiming new revelations. Now you're talking about liberal Protestant

1275
01:21:36.640 --> 01:21:39.520
<v Speaker 9>churches who say that there could be a new truth

1276
01:21:39.640 --> 01:21:43.920
<v Speaker 9>about you know, skittle stuff or women preachers or whatever. No,

1277
01:21:44.159 --> 01:21:47.000
<v Speaker 9>first of all, that's outlandish to begin with, because we

1278
01:21:47.079 --> 01:21:49.560
<v Speaker 9>can cut off all the cults with whether it's the

1279
01:21:49.640 --> 01:21:52.479
<v Speaker 9>Mormons or whether it's the Muslims with their new prophets.

1280
01:21:52.760 --> 01:21:57.319
<v Speaker 9>There are no new profits. Profits are done prophets. Jesus

1281
01:21:57.319 --> 01:22:00.000
<v Speaker 9>says in Luke sixteen sixteen that John was the life

1282
01:22:00.039 --> 01:22:03.279
<v Speaker 9>asked of the prophets, so there's no such thing as

1283
01:22:03.359 --> 01:22:06.880
<v Speaker 9>an Old Testament prophet. And when John the Apostle died,

1284
01:22:07.279 --> 01:22:10.520
<v Speaker 9>there's no more new Apostolic teachings or revelations. That's why

1285
01:22:10.680 --> 01:22:17.119
<v Speaker 9>cults like Mormons or Muslims require new divine revelation that

1286
01:22:17.680 --> 01:22:20.760
<v Speaker 9>compliments or quote corrects the old revelations.

1287
01:22:22.840 --> 01:22:25.560
<v Speaker 25>Awesome, I guess I have one more follow up question

1288
01:22:25.640 --> 01:22:27.279
<v Speaker 25>because of that, and and sorry.

1289
01:22:27.039 --> 01:22:27.960
<v Speaker 4>If it's really stupid.

1290
01:22:28.039 --> 01:22:29.720
<v Speaker 14>I'm a.

1291
01:22:31.319 --> 01:22:31.920
<v Speaker 9>Good questions.

1292
01:22:32.399 --> 01:22:35.600
<v Speaker 11>So in that guard, then, isn't.

1293
01:22:35.479 --> 01:22:37.560
<v Speaker 25>One of the fruits of the spirit prophecy?

1294
01:22:37.920 --> 01:22:41.000
<v Speaker 9>Or maybe I just have been right, but that's right.

1295
01:22:41.079 --> 01:22:44.279
<v Speaker 9>So that's during the period this is called the Intertestamental

1296
01:22:44.279 --> 01:22:47.000
<v Speaker 9>period between the Old Testament New Testament, right when the

1297
01:22:47.079 --> 01:22:50.560
<v Speaker 9>Church is being established at Pentecost. In the Book of

1298
01:22:50.640 --> 01:22:53.960
<v Speaker 9>Acts Paul's writing to the Corinthians. Yes, at that time

1299
01:22:54.239 --> 01:22:56.720
<v Speaker 9>it was necessary that there be a lot of these

1300
01:22:56.920 --> 01:22:59.840
<v Speaker 9>manifestations like that, and so you could have the Holy

1301
01:23:00.039 --> 01:23:03.079
<v Speaker 9>Spirit speaking through Agabus the prophet in the Book of Acts,

1302
01:23:03.119 --> 01:23:07.520
<v Speaker 9>for example, or whatever. But that is still that period

1303
01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:12.159
<v Speaker 9>prior to the death of the last Apostle John, And

1304
01:23:12.399 --> 01:23:15.199
<v Speaker 9>I don't think it's accidental. It's providential that at the

1305
01:23:15.319 --> 01:23:19.319
<v Speaker 9>end of John's Book of Revelation he says, don't add

1306
01:23:19.399 --> 01:23:22.039
<v Speaker 9>to this, there's no more adding to the divine revelation.

1307
01:23:22.159 --> 01:23:24.680
<v Speaker 9>So that kind of is the ceiling up a vision

1308
01:23:24.760 --> 01:23:27.079
<v Speaker 9>and prophecy that we read in Daniel nine twenty four

1309
01:23:27.079 --> 01:23:29.319
<v Speaker 9>to twenty seven. It says in the Messianic era, when

1310
01:23:29.319 --> 01:23:31.960
<v Speaker 9>the Messiah comms, there will be a ceiling up of

1311
01:23:33.079 --> 01:23:36.720
<v Speaker 9>vision and prophecy in the sense a public divine revelation.

1312
01:23:37.520 --> 01:23:39.960
<v Speaker 9>And what binds everybody. That doesn't mean that there's no

1313
01:23:40.079 --> 01:23:41.960
<v Speaker 9>more miracles. There could be a miracle. God can do

1314
01:23:42.039 --> 01:23:45.920
<v Speaker 9>what he wants. God can give a saint a dream

1315
01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:48.760
<v Speaker 9>or a vision of a clairvoyance or whatever. But that's

1316
01:23:48.920 --> 01:23:53.039
<v Speaker 9>different from public divine revelation that binds everyone in the church.

1317
01:23:53.359 --> 01:23:56.239
<v Speaker 9>And we know that because in the second and third

1318
01:23:56.319 --> 01:23:59.279
<v Speaker 9>century there was a group that arose called the Montanists,

1319
01:24:00.039 --> 01:24:03.239
<v Speaker 9>and Montanus claimed to be a new prophet who was

1320
01:24:03.319 --> 01:24:07.399
<v Speaker 9>given new divine revelations in the church. Out out of

1321
01:24:07.479 --> 01:24:08.920
<v Speaker 9>hand rejected Montanism.

1322
01:24:11.840 --> 01:24:13.079
<v Speaker 14>Man, I'm gonna be honest.

1323
01:24:13.199 --> 01:24:15.520
<v Speaker 25>You used a lot of things that I honestly have

1324
01:24:15.720 --> 01:24:18.079
<v Speaker 25>not heard of or words that I haven't heard over before.

1325
01:24:18.239 --> 01:24:21.479
<v Speaker 4>But listening to you and other Orthodox.

1326
01:24:22.520 --> 01:24:25.479
<v Speaker 25>Public figures has has encouraged me to go get.

1327
01:24:25.680 --> 01:24:28.199
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well just yeah, I really appreciate it. Yeah, get

1328
01:24:28.199 --> 01:24:30.439
<v Speaker 9>an orthodox study by it will take your time, you know,

1329
01:24:30.520 --> 01:24:32.039
<v Speaker 9>write some of the ideas down if you want to

1330
01:24:32.079 --> 01:24:33.199
<v Speaker 9>go double check it or whatever.

1331
01:24:33.760 --> 01:24:33.920
<v Speaker 10>You know.

1332
01:24:34.039 --> 01:24:36.479
<v Speaker 9>The the idea of Montanism is is, you know, just

1333
01:24:36.560 --> 01:24:38.960
<v Speaker 9>look up what the histor just just even Wikipedia would

1334
01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:42.239
<v Speaker 9>be good on something like Montanas M. O. N. T. A.

1335
01:24:42.319 --> 01:24:48.520
<v Speaker 9>And US and the Montanists and that early charismatic movement

1336
01:24:48.800 --> 01:24:52.760
<v Speaker 9>of the second third century, which by the way, claimed

1337
01:24:52.920 --> 01:24:56.199
<v Speaker 9>Tertullian as one of its member. Totullian left the church

1338
01:24:56.399 --> 01:25:00.920
<v Speaker 9>and became a Montanist. And so this early version of charismaticism,

1339
01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:03.520
<v Speaker 9>by the way, it also shows that all the crazy

1340
01:25:03.560 --> 01:25:06.399
<v Speaker 9>heresies that we see today, they were already there in

1341
01:25:06.479 --> 01:25:09.039
<v Speaker 9>the early Church in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh century.

1342
01:25:09.199 --> 01:25:11.520
<v Speaker 9>Even in the first and second century. You got the

1343
01:25:11.640 --> 01:25:16.239
<v Speaker 9>Judaizers like Bryce and Gray, you got the charismatic like

1344
01:25:17.319 --> 01:25:22.640
<v Speaker 9>Joseph Smith, Ellen White Pentecostals. All of these mistakes were

1345
01:25:22.680 --> 01:25:26.359
<v Speaker 9>already there and already rejected. Truth talker, by the way,

1346
01:25:26.399 --> 01:25:28.560
<v Speaker 9>give me just one second. It's freezing Colin here, gonna

1347
01:25:28.600 --> 01:25:39.239
<v Speaker 9>turn the air conditioning down. All right, truth talker, what's up?

1348
01:25:39.279 --> 01:25:42.000
<v Speaker 9>Man gonna? I'm you hey, but sorry, I didn't hear

1349
01:25:42.039 --> 01:25:45.039
<v Speaker 9>you speaking. There must have been a delay. What's on

1350
01:25:45.079 --> 01:25:45.640
<v Speaker 9>your question?

1351
01:25:46.159 --> 01:25:47.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, I just had a question.

1352
01:25:47.319 --> 01:25:50.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm just joining the space last few minutes and having

1353
01:25:50.800 --> 01:25:53.600
<v Speaker 12>heard the first part of it. So I grew up

1354
01:25:53.960 --> 01:25:59.279
<v Speaker 12>Southern Baptist, me too, and uh so I'm curiously that's

1355
01:25:59.319 --> 01:26:03.199
<v Speaker 12>been called so you know, I believe I know I've

1356
01:26:03.199 --> 01:26:05.079
<v Speaker 12>been reading up on you know some of the some

1357
01:26:05.199 --> 01:26:08.439
<v Speaker 12>of the early even Catholic church fathers, and you know,

1358
01:26:08.760 --> 01:26:10.920
<v Speaker 12>not so much Orthodox, but I'm reading up.

1359
01:26:10.880 --> 01:26:12.800
<v Speaker 9>On that, and well, well we have the same church

1360
01:26:12.880 --> 01:26:15.960
<v Speaker 9>fathers for the first thousand years, so right, right.

1361
01:26:15.920 --> 01:26:19.960
<v Speaker 12>Right, So so to my knowledge, we believe the same obviously,

1362
01:26:20.159 --> 01:26:21.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, the Trinity, the Triyan God.

1363
01:26:21.880 --> 01:26:22.039
<v Speaker 11>Right.

1364
01:26:22.279 --> 01:26:25.239
<v Speaker 12>So when when the titles Protestism is false, I just

1365
01:26:25.399 --> 01:26:26.319
<v Speaker 12>real quickly.

1366
01:26:26.039 --> 01:26:27.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, not to go too long, but what do

1367
01:26:27.479 --> 01:26:28.079
<v Speaker 4>you mean by that?

1368
01:26:28.239 --> 01:26:29.920
<v Speaker 12>And then I had a couple of follow.

1369
01:26:29.800 --> 01:26:33.640
<v Speaker 9>Up questions, Well, uh, it's true that in terms of

1370
01:26:34.479 --> 01:26:37.199
<v Speaker 9>what we verbally say, when we say we believe in

1371
01:26:37.199 --> 01:26:39.560
<v Speaker 9>the deed of Christ and the Trinity, that's true that, yes,

1372
01:26:39.800 --> 01:26:44.439
<v Speaker 9>we agree Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, everybody agrees that there is

1373
01:26:44.600 --> 01:26:47.880
<v Speaker 9>a Trinity and that Jesus is divine. But actually the

1374
01:26:48.359 --> 01:26:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox doctrine of the Trinity is not the same as

1375
01:26:50.720 --> 01:26:54.399
<v Speaker 9>the Doctor and Trinity in either Protestantism or Roman Catholicism.

1376
01:26:54.479 --> 01:26:56.439
<v Speaker 9>So we have a unique doctrine of the Trinity which

1377
01:26:56.520 --> 01:27:00.760
<v Speaker 9>posits a strict view of monarchical trinitarianism and the rejection

1378
01:27:00.960 --> 01:27:03.680
<v Speaker 9>of the philioque, as well as the doctrine of the

1379
01:27:03.760 --> 01:27:08.359
<v Speaker 9>uncreated energies. Those are essential, absolutely necessary teachings of the

1380
01:27:08.439 --> 01:27:11.880
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox Church about who the Trinity and who Jesus are.

1381
01:27:13.840 --> 01:27:19.560
<v Speaker 9>And also Protestantism classically speaking or in terms of historical

1382
01:27:19.640 --> 01:27:23.960
<v Speaker 9>Protestanism is defined by its confessions, and so this is

1383
01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:27.760
<v Speaker 9>called classical Protestanism. Even the Southern Baptists have the Southern

1384
01:27:27.800 --> 01:27:32.720
<v Speaker 9>Baptist Statement of Faith everything something like that. So even

1385
01:27:32.760 --> 01:27:36.680
<v Speaker 9>they have like a general layout of the principles that

1386
01:27:36.760 --> 01:27:44.600
<v Speaker 9>they believe, you know, confessional Protestantism, whether it's Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, Anglican,

1387
01:27:44.800 --> 01:27:48.920
<v Speaker 9>they all have their public professions of faith. And we

1388
01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:53.760
<v Speaker 9>would disagree with the solas solofide, you know, sol scriptura.

1389
01:27:54.359 --> 01:27:56.640
<v Speaker 9>We would also disagree with the notion of the rights

1390
01:27:56.680 --> 01:28:02.399
<v Speaker 9>to private interpretation. We would disagree with a totally unbounded

1391
01:28:02.520 --> 01:28:05.439
<v Speaker 9>notion of freedom of contents of worship that the classical

1392
01:28:05.520 --> 01:28:10.039
<v Speaker 9>reformers taught. So there's a lot of different ways that

1393
01:28:10.159 --> 01:28:12.880
<v Speaker 9>that discussion could go, but those are the basics.

1394
01:28:13.720 --> 01:28:19.079
<v Speaker 12>So I would agree that there's probably some differences, I think,

1395
01:28:19.119 --> 01:28:22.159
<v Speaker 12>though I think that the main I think the main

1396
01:28:22.199 --> 01:28:24.560
<v Speaker 12>point I want to maybe go with you on just

1397
01:28:24.600 --> 01:28:26.960
<v Speaker 12>for a couple of minutes is the you know, uh,

1398
01:28:27.399 --> 01:28:30.600
<v Speaker 12>the solo interpretation, I think, at least in my church.

1399
01:28:30.680 --> 01:28:34.479
<v Speaker 12>So I'll speak on my personal experience. My pastor used

1400
01:28:34.479 --> 01:28:36.720
<v Speaker 12>to say, even at a very young age, for myself,

1401
01:28:36.800 --> 01:28:39.479
<v Speaker 12>there's no such thing as your personal interpretation. There's only

1402
01:28:39.560 --> 01:28:42.640
<v Speaker 12>the truth, and then there's false interpretations of the doctrine.

1403
01:28:42.720 --> 01:28:42.840
<v Speaker 14>Right.

1404
01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:47.279
<v Speaker 12>So do you think that what you said about how

1405
01:28:47.319 --> 01:28:49.720
<v Speaker 12>the Protestant churches kind of have their own Oh, this

1406
01:28:49.880 --> 01:28:51.800
<v Speaker 12>is what I got, this is what I feel about.

1407
01:28:51.960 --> 01:28:54.039
<v Speaker 4>Is that unique to a.

1408
01:28:54.079 --> 01:28:55.880
<v Speaker 12>Small number of churches or do you think that that's

1409
01:28:56.079 --> 01:28:59.279
<v Speaker 12>just kind of a whole of Protestant faith of Well,

1410
01:28:59.359 --> 01:29:01.560
<v Speaker 12>I don't need I don't need the clergy to tell me.

1411
01:29:01.880 --> 01:29:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't need scholars and.

1412
01:29:02.920 --> 01:29:03.680
<v Speaker 12>Tell me what this means.

1413
01:29:03.720 --> 01:29:04.760
<v Speaker 14>This is how I feel about it.

1414
01:29:04.840 --> 01:29:06.119
<v Speaker 12>Is that is that kind of what you think is?

1415
01:29:06.319 --> 01:29:08.039
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it could apply to that, but I

1416
01:29:08.119 --> 01:29:11.720
<v Speaker 9>mean beyond just that question of I understand that many

1417
01:29:11.760 --> 01:29:16.359
<v Speaker 9>Protestants and Evangelicals would would recognize some degree of authority

1418
01:29:16.479 --> 01:29:20.880
<v Speaker 9>for elders and you know, pastors and presbyters. But I'm

1419
01:29:20.920 --> 01:29:24.960
<v Speaker 9>saying it's a fundamentally different principle of church governance. It's

1420
01:29:24.960 --> 01:29:29.960
<v Speaker 9>an episcopate, it's Apostolic succession. It's the necessity of Apostolic

1421
01:29:30.039 --> 01:29:33.079
<v Speaker 9>tradition to know what the Biblical canon is, for example,

1422
01:29:33.199 --> 01:29:35.600
<v Speaker 9>hence why we have more books than the Protestant canon.

1423
01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:38.199
<v Speaker 9>So all of those elements go into it, as well

1424
01:29:38.319 --> 01:29:43.000
<v Speaker 9>as the separate issue of the successors to the apostles

1425
01:29:43.119 --> 01:29:46.199
<v Speaker 9>not just having the right to state their opinions, but

1426
01:29:46.319 --> 01:29:49.079
<v Speaker 9>actually to bind people to an interpretation. So for example,

1427
01:29:49.119 --> 01:29:51.560
<v Speaker 9>at the Council of Nicia, they don't just kind of

1428
01:29:51.600 --> 01:29:54.359
<v Speaker 9>give an option for Arias and say, look, Arius, it'd

1429
01:29:54.359 --> 01:29:56.560
<v Speaker 9>be nice if you agreed with us, but if not,

1430
01:29:56.880 --> 01:29:59.520
<v Speaker 9>you can go start. You know, the Aryan stripmall church,

1431
01:29:59.760 --> 01:30:03.239
<v Speaker 9>you know, if you want no. They believe that they

1432
01:30:03.359 --> 01:30:06.239
<v Speaker 9>have the authority, like Paul told the church at Corinth

1433
01:30:06.359 --> 01:30:10.319
<v Speaker 9>to excommunicate people and hand them over to Satan. And

1434
01:30:10.439 --> 01:30:15.000
<v Speaker 9>that's why the church says we excommunicate areas he is

1435
01:30:15.079 --> 01:30:19.039
<v Speaker 9>of the double you know, he's out. And ultimately ex

1436
01:30:19.039 --> 01:30:22.199
<v Speaker 9>communication is intended to have a remedial effect. It's not

1437
01:30:22.399 --> 01:30:25.840
<v Speaker 9>just to quote damn people, but it is a real

1438
01:30:26.079 --> 01:30:29.840
<v Speaker 9>power and authority that you do not really see in

1439
01:30:30.439 --> 01:30:34.880
<v Speaker 9>the Protestant mindset. Precisely because there's a tension in Protestant

1440
01:30:34.920 --> 01:30:38.039
<v Speaker 9>theology between the right of private interpretation and the freedom

1441
01:30:38.079 --> 01:30:41.359
<v Speaker 9>of conscience, and the so called authority of a minister

1442
01:30:41.520 --> 01:30:44.760
<v Speaker 9>to bind people to an interpretation and to excommunicate them.

1443
01:30:46.079 --> 01:30:49.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this will be my last talking point. I

1444
01:30:49.199 --> 01:30:50.560
<v Speaker 4>know you got a lot of people that probably want.

1445
01:30:50.439 --> 01:30:50.760
<v Speaker 10>To come up.

1446
01:30:51.720 --> 01:30:54.359
<v Speaker 12>I think that maybe then, just hearing, because this isn't

1447
01:30:54.359 --> 01:30:57.720
<v Speaker 12>the first time I've had this conversation with someone in orthodoxy.

1448
01:30:58.760 --> 01:31:01.319
<v Speaker 12>I think the more I hear it, where I realized

1449
01:31:01.359 --> 01:31:04.199
<v Speaker 12>that maybe my circumstance may have been unique in the

1450
01:31:04.239 --> 01:31:06.079
<v Speaker 12>way that our pastor guided our church.

1451
01:31:06.960 --> 01:31:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't seem like you got it in in.

1452
01:31:08.359 --> 01:31:10.079
<v Speaker 14>A typical Protestant type way.

1453
01:31:10.760 --> 01:31:13.119
<v Speaker 12>But uh, you know that being said, I think that

1454
01:31:14.319 --> 01:31:16.119
<v Speaker 12>you know, maybe maybe maybe.

1455
01:31:15.960 --> 01:31:18.840
<v Speaker 9>You can give your opinion that Apostolic succession, and we

1456
01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:23.159
<v Speaker 9>believe is when Paul talks to Timothy that he taught

1457
01:31:23.239 --> 01:31:25.720
<v Speaker 9>for three years, day and night in Ephesus x twenty,

1458
01:31:25.800 --> 01:31:28.479
<v Speaker 9>and then he lays hands on Timothy. He tells Timothy

1459
01:31:28.600 --> 01:31:30.840
<v Speaker 9>not to hastily lay hands on anyone because the gift

1460
01:31:30.880 --> 01:31:33.399
<v Speaker 9>to the Holy Spirit has passed on That for us

1461
01:31:33.560 --> 01:31:37.319
<v Speaker 9>is apostolic succession, which is a real power. They shouldn't

1462
01:31:37.359 --> 01:31:40.520
<v Speaker 9>be given hastily, and it's modeled on numbers eleven. When

1463
01:31:40.600 --> 01:31:43.760
<v Speaker 9>you know you have the elders being laid their hands

1464
01:31:44.279 --> 01:31:47.159
<v Speaker 9>by Moses, and then it says the Holy Spirit's given

1465
01:31:47.199 --> 01:31:49.720
<v Speaker 9>by Moses to the elders. This is mirrored by what

1466
01:31:49.880 --> 01:31:54.640
<v Speaker 9>Paul's doing. And most Protestants do not believe that in

1467
01:31:54.680 --> 01:31:57.399
<v Speaker 9>the laying out of hands there's an actual transference of

1468
01:31:57.479 --> 01:32:01.079
<v Speaker 9>power by the Holy Spirit. Hence they don't scary well,

1469
01:32:01.079 --> 01:32:02.920
<v Speaker 9>they don't believe in They don't believe that it's a

1470
01:32:04.960 --> 01:32:08.079
<v Speaker 9>a sacramental power. They just kind of see it as

1471
01:32:08.720 --> 01:32:11.560
<v Speaker 9>a committee appointing you to be a pastor or whatever.

1472
01:32:12.319 --> 01:32:12.479
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

1473
01:32:12.600 --> 01:32:14.239
<v Speaker 12>No, I can see where that can be a problem

1474
01:32:14.319 --> 01:32:16.680
<v Speaker 12>because that's anti biblical for them to say that it

1475
01:32:17.159 --> 01:32:18.079
<v Speaker 12>is insignificant.

1476
01:32:18.239 --> 01:32:19.720
<v Speaker 9>Anyway, I agree with you on that.

1477
01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:21.880
<v Speaker 12>So all right, Well, I look, I said, man, I

1478
01:32:21.880 --> 01:32:22.359
<v Speaker 12>don't want to.

1479
01:32:22.319 --> 01:32:23.000
<v Speaker 19>Take up too much time.

1480
01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate I camming in your spaces.

1481
01:32:34.079 --> 01:32:46.319
<v Speaker 9>Luther. Hey, how's it going, Yes, sir.

1482
01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:51.960
<v Speaker 10>Uh, I was listening to one of your streams a

1483
01:32:52.039 --> 01:32:55.760
<v Speaker 10>few days ago and I heard someone comment that concessional

1484
01:32:55.840 --> 01:32:57.399
<v Speaker 10>Lutherans are your greatest fear.

1485
01:32:57.920 --> 01:32:59.439
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, terrified.

1486
01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:04.760
<v Speaker 14>Thought that was funny. But I haven't heard a lot

1487
01:33:04.800 --> 01:33:06.439
<v Speaker 14>of confessional Lutherans.

1488
01:33:06.279 --> 01:33:09.119
<v Speaker 9>Call in, Well, there's not that many that are out

1489
01:33:09.159 --> 01:33:13.520
<v Speaker 9>there debating, so that's probably a better explanation. Yeah, I

1490
01:33:13.720 --> 01:33:14.279
<v Speaker 9>would agree.

1491
01:33:17.159 --> 01:33:22.199
<v Speaker 10>So I had a few questions. First, one would be

1492
01:33:23.680 --> 01:33:25.119
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to the philioque.

1493
01:33:25.359 --> 01:33:25.960
<v Speaker 7>I think I was.

1494
01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:27.039
<v Speaker 9>Listening to your.

1495
01:33:28.520 --> 01:33:32.800
<v Speaker 10>Conversation slash debate with Redeemed Zoomer, you know.

1496
01:33:33.119 --> 01:33:36.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll touched on that a little bit, and he got

1497
01:33:36.680 --> 01:33:37.640
<v Speaker 4>into the idea.

1498
01:33:37.479 --> 01:33:41.159
<v Speaker 10>That if if we say that the spirit proceeds from

1499
01:33:41.199 --> 01:33:43.920
<v Speaker 10>both the Father and the Son, that that in some

1500
01:33:44.079 --> 01:33:48.760
<v Speaker 10>way onto logically subordinates the spirit.

1501
01:33:50.319 --> 01:33:53.039
<v Speaker 9>Right, because you're giving you're giving an attribute. You're giving

1502
01:33:53.079 --> 01:33:56.439
<v Speaker 9>a positive power attribute to two persons that one of

1503
01:33:56.479 --> 01:34:01.880
<v Speaker 9>them lacks. And the Cappadocian dictum of all trinitarian theology

1504
01:34:01.960 --> 01:34:04.760
<v Speaker 9>of the Second Ecumenical Council is that there's nothing that

1505
01:34:04.920 --> 01:34:09.279
<v Speaker 9>all three persons share that's not a property of essence,

1506
01:34:09.880 --> 01:34:12.520
<v Speaker 9>and anything that is unique is a property of a

1507
01:34:12.640 --> 01:34:16.720
<v Speaker 9>single person in the triad. So, for example, to be

1508
01:34:16.880 --> 01:34:21.159
<v Speaker 9>the son, that's the unique property of the son. Sonship

1509
01:34:21.279 --> 01:34:23.279
<v Speaker 9>is not shared, and it's not a property of the

1510
01:34:23.319 --> 01:34:26.800
<v Speaker 9>divine essence. It's unique to the second hypostasis of the

1511
01:34:26.920 --> 01:34:30.319
<v Speaker 9>son to be the cause is unique to the Father.

1512
01:34:30.439 --> 01:34:34.960
<v Speaker 9>That's his hypostatic property. So cause in the Trinity cannot

1513
01:34:35.039 --> 01:34:38.159
<v Speaker 9>be shared without creating a diad where you have two

1514
01:34:38.279 --> 01:34:42.000
<v Speaker 9>persons that form a principle of unity that the Holy

1515
01:34:42.079 --> 01:34:45.039
<v Speaker 9>Spirit does not have or is not part of, because

1516
01:34:45.079 --> 01:34:48.159
<v Speaker 9>no one believes that the Holy Spirit spirates or generates

1517
01:34:48.159 --> 01:34:52.039
<v Speaker 9>any persons, you see, So he lacks this positive power

1518
01:34:52.239 --> 01:34:55.560
<v Speaker 9>or attribute. So there's no such thing in trianitarient theology

1519
01:34:55.640 --> 01:34:59.520
<v Speaker 9>as attributes that two persons share that one lacks. So

1520
01:35:00.600 --> 01:35:05.600
<v Speaker 9>cause must be restricted to a hypostatic property and thus

1521
01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:08.199
<v Speaker 9>only had by one person, the Father.

1522
01:35:09.720 --> 01:35:12.600
<v Speaker 14>All right, that makes sense to me.

1523
01:35:13.800 --> 01:35:17.720
<v Speaker 9>That's the that's the orthodoxology. You're already orthodoxylia.

1524
01:35:20.720 --> 01:35:21.279
<v Speaker 25>Necessary.

1525
01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:25.439
<v Speaker 14>You mentioned a council that discussed.

1526
01:35:25.279 --> 01:35:30.279
<v Speaker 9>Well, the second Ecumenical Council is the normative definition for

1527
01:35:30.399 --> 01:35:35.000
<v Speaker 9>Trinitarian conciliar theology. The Trinity doesn't become a focus of

1528
01:35:35.159 --> 01:35:41.079
<v Speaker 9>councils uh until the Palamite Synods, and that's in the

1529
01:35:41.119 --> 01:35:45.319
<v Speaker 9>Middle Ages. So basically the first econmenical council is the

1530
01:35:45.359 --> 01:35:50.640
<v Speaker 9>d do christ Athanacious areas et cetera. Second Ecumenical Council

1531
01:35:50.840 --> 01:35:54.720
<v Speaker 9>is the Trinity, and it's Cappadocian theology that dominates that.

1532
01:35:54.960 --> 01:36:00.319
<v Speaker 9>That's basal of cesarea. Uh, that's Gregory Nazianzus and Gregor

1533
01:36:00.359 --> 01:36:03.840
<v Speaker 9>of Nissa. Those three church fathers are the theologians par

1534
01:36:03.960 --> 01:36:07.960
<v Speaker 9>excellence and particularly Gregor Nissa of the Second Ecumenical Council.

1535
01:36:08.600 --> 01:36:11.920
<v Speaker 9>So Trinity doesn't get debated much because the next several

1536
01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:16.560
<v Speaker 9>councils focus on Christology, and then Trinity comes up again

1537
01:36:16.800 --> 01:36:22.520
<v Speaker 9>in the Energies in Phillyoquoid controversy of the Byzantine Church

1538
01:36:22.840 --> 01:36:27.319
<v Speaker 9>versus the Council of Lions, in Rome, in the West,

1539
01:36:27.439 --> 01:36:30.359
<v Speaker 9>and in the Council of Florence. So trinity doesn't be

1540
01:36:30.399 --> 01:36:34.039
<v Speaker 9>an issue anymore until then doesn't become an issue. And

1541
01:36:34.159 --> 01:36:39.359
<v Speaker 9>the Cappadocian dictum is whatever is a common property is

1542
01:36:39.399 --> 01:36:42.399
<v Speaker 9>shared by all three, and whatever is a hyposthetic property

1543
01:36:42.439 --> 01:36:43.199
<v Speaker 9>is only had by one.

1544
01:36:44.680 --> 01:36:48.720
<v Speaker 10>All right, I haven't studied much of that, to be

1545
01:36:48.800 --> 01:36:54.079
<v Speaker 10>honest with you, I'd be curious. So why you think

1546
01:36:54.239 --> 01:36:59.800
<v Speaker 10>the Western Church just kind of ignored that concept.

1547
01:37:00.319 --> 01:37:04.960
<v Speaker 9>I don't think they ignored it. I think that Latin theology. Uh, well,

1548
01:37:05.239 --> 01:37:08.039
<v Speaker 9>in the case of the Second Acadomical Council, Rome didn't

1549
01:37:08.079 --> 01:37:10.880
<v Speaker 9>accept that council. In fact, the council has had out

1550
01:37:10.880 --> 01:37:16.159
<v Speaker 9>of communion with Rome. It was presided over by St. Melidius,

1551
01:37:16.880 --> 01:37:19.640
<v Speaker 9>and at that time was in schism with Room. It's

1552
01:37:19.640 --> 01:37:22.840
<v Speaker 9>called the Malician schism, and Rome didn't accept that until

1553
01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:27.119
<v Speaker 9>about two or hundred years after Calcedon. So Constantinople One

1554
01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:32.319
<v Speaker 9>was not accepted in the West until centuries after Poblio.

1555
01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:39.000
<v Speaker 10>But was Rome in or I guess it would be

1556
01:37:39.039 --> 01:37:43.039
<v Speaker 10>the Western Church. Were they in communion with the Eastern Church.

1557
01:37:42.960 --> 01:37:47.119
<v Speaker 9>For a time even Yeah, broadly speaking, yes, broadly speaking yes,

1558
01:37:47.239 --> 01:37:48.159
<v Speaker 9>but I mean the.

1559
01:37:51.960 --> 01:37:52.159
<v Speaker 11>Yes.

1560
01:37:52.239 --> 01:37:56.680
<v Speaker 9>So after Augustine you have the dominance of his Neoplatonic

1561
01:37:57.039 --> 01:38:02.840
<v Speaker 9>influenced model of the triad based around Neoplatonic doctrines of simplicity.

1562
01:38:03.399 --> 01:38:08.359
<v Speaker 9>So Augustine starts with Plutonian definitions as to what simplicity

1563
01:38:08.479 --> 01:38:10.880
<v Speaker 9>is and must be, and then Trinity has worked into that.

1564
01:38:11.640 --> 01:38:15.159
<v Speaker 9>So we do not in the East accept his model

1565
01:38:15.199 --> 01:38:18.359
<v Speaker 9>of the Trinity because it was not accepted at constantinble One.

1566
01:38:20.079 --> 01:38:22.520
<v Speaker 10>All right, so it's Augustine's fault.

1567
01:38:22.600 --> 01:38:26.119
<v Speaker 9>Then, well, it's not one person's fault. It's a series

1568
01:38:26.359 --> 01:38:33.039
<v Speaker 9>of issues of theological assumptions about metaphysics that take many

1569
01:38:33.159 --> 01:38:36.760
<v Speaker 9>centuries to kind of come true fruition. So that's why

1570
01:38:36.800 --> 01:38:42.439
<v Speaker 9>we don't reject the West until they dogmatically state their

1571
01:38:42.560 --> 01:38:46.119
<v Speaker 9>position in the eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries. That's when

1572
01:38:46.159 --> 01:38:48.159
<v Speaker 9>you find a real split between you and West.

1573
01:38:49.479 --> 01:38:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, if you don't mind, have another question.

1574
01:38:53.800 --> 01:38:57.159
<v Speaker 10>Okay, I think this was another thing that came up

1575
01:38:57.199 --> 01:39:03.359
<v Speaker 10>in that conversation with redeem Zuomer. But uh, and it's

1576
01:39:03.399 --> 01:39:07.039
<v Speaker 10>come up a lot. But the idea that the Protestant

1577
01:39:07.479 --> 01:39:12.800
<v Speaker 10>view of imputation or I mean it relates to justification,

1578
01:39:12.920 --> 01:39:15.560
<v Speaker 10>also that it is somehow nominalist.

1579
01:39:17.840 --> 01:39:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Help me understand that.

1580
01:39:19.159 --> 01:39:22.840
<v Speaker 9>Read Haiko Oberman's book about Luther being influenced by William

1581
01:39:22.840 --> 01:39:27.479
<v Speaker 9>of Aackaman Gabriel Bile, and that will explain how that

1582
01:39:27.680 --> 01:39:29.399
<v Speaker 9>was the first time in history that you could have

1583
01:39:29.479 --> 01:39:33.319
<v Speaker 9>a person positing the idea that God can pronounce something

1584
01:39:34.119 --> 01:39:37.039
<v Speaker 9>and it be a legal status, completely divorced from the

1585
01:39:37.119 --> 01:39:40.800
<v Speaker 9>ontological status. So God can call me righteous even though

1586
01:39:40.800 --> 01:39:45.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm wicked. Nominalism is the philosophy that facilitates that.

1587
01:39:47.239 --> 01:39:48.359
<v Speaker 25>What would you say to.

1588
01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:53.479
<v Speaker 10>Response is that basically, it's not it's not that it

1589
01:39:53.520 --> 01:39:55.840
<v Speaker 10>doesn't have an ontological basis.

1590
01:39:55.520 --> 01:39:58.560
<v Speaker 9>Because it's but that is the Protestant view. The Protestant

1591
01:39:58.640 --> 01:40:01.239
<v Speaker 9>view is in terms of souls, tour and justification by

1592
01:40:01.279 --> 01:40:04.119
<v Speaker 9>faith alone, is that when God pronounces you righteous, it

1593
01:40:04.199 --> 01:40:07.199
<v Speaker 9>has nothing to do with anything in you or that

1594
01:40:07.399 --> 01:40:10.760
<v Speaker 9>you do. It is solely on the basis of the

1595
01:40:10.880 --> 01:40:16.880
<v Speaker 9>imputation in Christ's work. Well, I don't know.

1596
01:40:16.960 --> 01:40:19.920
<v Speaker 10>I tend to think of it more as having a

1597
01:40:21.079 --> 01:40:23.640
<v Speaker 10>union with Christ aspect to it.

1598
01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:28.920
<v Speaker 9>No, No, the doctrine of justification in classical Reformation teaching

1599
01:40:29.840 --> 01:40:33.520
<v Speaker 9>does not posit that the basis of the legal imputation

1600
01:40:33.760 --> 01:40:35.600
<v Speaker 9>is anything that you do. That's Luther.

1601
01:40:39.199 --> 01:40:39.560
<v Speaker 10>I don't know.

1602
01:40:41.359 --> 01:40:43.920
<v Speaker 9>You don't know. I mean, I've read Luther's commentary on

1603
01:40:44.039 --> 01:40:46.479
<v Speaker 9>Romans is commentary on Galatians. You don't think he teaches that.

1604
01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:50.039
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, he might teach something like that, or he

1605
01:40:50.119 --> 01:40:52.920
<v Speaker 10>might He might be kind of inconsistent because he also

1606
01:40:53.840 --> 01:40:57.720
<v Speaker 10>speaks very highly of baptism in it that in baptism,

1607
01:40:57.840 --> 01:41:02.680
<v Speaker 10>that's that's when we are clothed Christ's righteousness. I'd also

1608
01:41:02.760 --> 01:41:05.720
<v Speaker 10>go to Romans six, like we we truly die with

1609
01:41:05.960 --> 01:41:09.000
<v Speaker 10>Christ's in baptism and are.

1610
01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:11.479
<v Speaker 9>United to him in that way. Yeah, I understand. He

1611
01:41:11.600 --> 01:41:15.359
<v Speaker 9>teaches baptism regeneration, but even baptism regeneration, the gifts and

1612
01:41:15.439 --> 01:41:18.560
<v Speaker 9>graces of that come to you because you're elect right,

1613
01:41:18.720 --> 01:41:22.560
<v Speaker 9>So he believes in predestination like Augustine does. Se the

1614
01:41:22.720 --> 01:41:25.399
<v Speaker 9>actions and works that you do, even going to the

1615
01:41:25.439 --> 01:41:28.920
<v Speaker 9>baptismal font. In Luther's view, it's God that caused you

1616
01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.600
<v Speaker 9>to get there and to be baptized. So even those

1617
01:41:31.720 --> 01:41:37.560
<v Speaker 9>works are the works that God caused in you. Maybe

1618
01:41:37.800 --> 01:41:41.439
<v Speaker 9>maybe somewhat hold on, hold on, hold on, you say,

1619
01:41:41.520 --> 01:41:45.319
<v Speaker 9>maybe somewhat. Have you read Bonda of the Will, I've

1620
01:41:45.439 --> 01:41:48.800
<v Speaker 9>started it. Okay, Well, that's why he's got.

1621
01:41:48.680 --> 01:41:52.840
<v Speaker 14>A strong, a strong predestination view.

1622
01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:55.119
<v Speaker 9>And he says what I just told you because I

1623
01:41:55.159 --> 01:42:00.159
<v Speaker 9>read this book twenty years ago. Yeah, well, I know.

1624
01:42:00.239 --> 01:42:03.439
<v Speaker 10>We also just believe in infant baptism and that all

1625
01:42:03.560 --> 01:42:04.319
<v Speaker 10>babies who.

1626
01:42:04.279 --> 01:42:09.960
<v Speaker 9>Are I know that, but that still can fit within

1627
01:42:10.039 --> 01:42:13.479
<v Speaker 9>an Augustinian predestinarian model. Augustine believed the same thing, that

1628
01:42:14.159 --> 01:42:16.960
<v Speaker 9>infants who make it to the font were destined to

1629
01:42:17.039 --> 01:42:22.279
<v Speaker 9>be there. In Augustine's model, he doesn't believe that that

1630
01:42:22.520 --> 01:42:25.159
<v Speaker 9>necessitates that you get the gift of perseverance, so you

1631
01:42:25.279 --> 01:42:29.199
<v Speaker 9>might fall away in the Augustinian model. Luther's model is

1632
01:42:29.239 --> 01:42:32.159
<v Speaker 9>more like a well, if you fell away, you were

1633
01:42:32.199 --> 01:42:34.680
<v Speaker 9>never really elect So I know he's not a Calvinist

1634
01:42:34.760 --> 01:42:37.439
<v Speaker 9>because he believes in a baptism regeneration. Calvin does not.

1635
01:42:38.279 --> 01:42:42.239
<v Speaker 9>But I assure you that what I'm telling you is correct.

1636
01:42:42.359 --> 01:42:45.119
<v Speaker 9>I had when I was a Calvinist. I had a

1637
01:42:45.359 --> 01:42:47.199
<v Speaker 9>period maybe a year, where I was tempted to be

1638
01:42:47.439 --> 01:42:50.600
<v Speaker 9>interested in Lutheranism, and so I read about six or

1639
01:42:50.600 --> 01:42:55.720
<v Speaker 9>seven of Luther's books twenty years ago. But I eventually

1640
01:42:55.880 --> 01:43:03.720
<v Speaker 9>was not convinced because Lutheranism is crystologically erroneous. And I

1641
01:43:03.840 --> 01:43:08.239
<v Speaker 9>read Luther's debate with Jan Eck, and if you read

1642
01:43:08.239 --> 01:43:11.520
<v Speaker 9>the full debate, it's pretty funny. And I found k

1643
01:43:11.600 --> 01:43:13.760
<v Speaker 9>to be the winner of that debate. But I thank

1644
01:43:13.800 --> 01:43:21.439
<v Speaker 9>you for your questions. Uh, we're looking for Protestants tonight,

1645
01:43:21.560 --> 01:43:23.840
<v Speaker 9>so I see a lot of Orthodox guys. I'm asking

1646
01:43:23.920 --> 01:43:27.960
<v Speaker 9>for Protestants, Holy Assassin, what's up? Protestants or Catholics are

1647
01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:32.199
<v Speaker 9>Muslims tonight? Please? If you're an Orthodox catechumen, don't bring you.

1648
01:43:33.720 --> 01:43:34.079
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

1649
01:43:34.119 --> 01:43:35.720
<v Speaker 4>How's it going your mind.

1650
01:43:37.119 --> 01:43:39.520
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, honestly, I mainly wanted to kind of discuss the

1651
01:43:39.720 --> 01:43:41.039
<v Speaker 15>Orthodox Church.

1652
01:43:41.159 --> 01:43:43.800
<v Speaker 4>View of the Old Testament, but I I just had

1653
01:43:43.840 --> 01:43:44.479
<v Speaker 4>a quick question.

1654
01:43:44.600 --> 01:43:47.239
<v Speaker 15>So I've heard you say that, like when you're when

1655
01:43:47.279 --> 01:43:51.479
<v Speaker 15>you are defending the Orthodox position on justification, you say

1656
01:43:51.600 --> 01:43:55.960
<v Speaker 15>like that, even like putting your faith in Jesus is

1657
01:43:56.039 --> 01:43:57.479
<v Speaker 15>a word you do right with Like, ha, do you

1658
01:43:57.560 --> 01:44:01.199
<v Speaker 15>reconcile with that? With Ephesians where Paul says that.

1659
01:44:03.239 --> 01:44:08.760
<v Speaker 9>You know that salvation is a gift, Jesus is the

1660
01:44:08.800 --> 01:44:11.239
<v Speaker 9>one that says this is the work of God, that

1661
01:44:11.319 --> 01:44:12.520
<v Speaker 9>you believe on him that He's sent.

1662
01:44:16.880 --> 01:44:17.319
<v Speaker 14>Are you there?

1663
01:44:25.359 --> 01:44:26.640
<v Speaker 9>I can't hear you, So I don't know if you

1664
01:44:26.760 --> 01:44:29.399
<v Speaker 9>dropped off for what. Yeah. I don't think there's any

1665
01:44:30.039 --> 01:44:34.800
<v Speaker 9>discord between the idea that works are necessary and that

1666
01:44:35.159 --> 01:44:38.039
<v Speaker 9>their gifts of grace. The only difference is that I

1667
01:44:38.159 --> 01:44:42.399
<v Speaker 9>don't believe in the Lutheran view that God is directly

1668
01:44:42.800 --> 01:44:45.920
<v Speaker 9>causing me to do the good works. There's a cooperation

1669
01:44:46.359 --> 01:44:51.079
<v Speaker 9>that goes along with me working with God. And that's

1670
01:44:51.119 --> 01:44:54.319
<v Speaker 9>why Paul can say that the only faith that counts

1671
01:44:54.359 --> 01:44:57.720
<v Speaker 9>this is Paul, not James. Paul says, the only faith

1672
01:44:57.800 --> 01:45:01.560
<v Speaker 9>that counts is the faith that worketh through love. And

1673
01:45:01.640 --> 01:45:03.760
<v Speaker 9>when he lists what love is and verse twenty thirteen,

1674
01:45:03.920 --> 01:45:07.199
<v Speaker 9>it's a bunch of works. So Paul teaches the necessity

1675
01:45:07.319 --> 01:45:11.720
<v Speaker 9>of works. But the works, as Augustine says, themselves, are

1676
01:45:11.800 --> 01:45:15.039
<v Speaker 9>also divine gifts of grace. That doesn't mean that I

1677
01:45:15.079 --> 01:45:17.680
<v Speaker 9>don't cooperate. But I can still say that my good

1678
01:45:17.800 --> 01:45:21.319
<v Speaker 9>works even though I do have a synergy that God

1679
01:45:21.439 --> 01:45:25.520
<v Speaker 9>created me to have as a created being who cooperates

1680
01:45:25.560 --> 01:45:28.000
<v Speaker 9>with God, like Paul says, Paul says, I am a

1681
01:45:28.199 --> 01:45:32.119
<v Speaker 9>co worker with Christ. Is Paul detracting from God's grace

1682
01:45:32.159 --> 01:45:35.640
<v Speaker 9>because he calls himself a coworker. No, and so likewise

1683
01:45:35.720 --> 01:45:39.399
<v Speaker 9>we are co workers. But get the works themselves are

1684
01:45:39.520 --> 01:45:43.359
<v Speaker 9>also done by grace. If you want to come back,

1685
01:45:45.079 --> 01:45:46.439
<v Speaker 9>try again, if you're at Mike's.

1686
01:45:46.239 --> 01:45:49.760
<v Speaker 14>Working, you can hear me.

1687
01:45:50.000 --> 01:45:54.880
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, yeah, mat, I totally got disconnected. So yeah, So

1688
01:45:55.159 --> 01:45:58.279
<v Speaker 15>the Orthodox Church, right, you have a canon? So like

1689
01:45:58.399 --> 01:46:02.720
<v Speaker 15>what's the basis of the Orthodox canon? Because and like,

1690
01:46:02.880 --> 01:46:05.520
<v Speaker 15>how do you even trust that the Orthodox is right

1691
01:46:05.680 --> 01:46:08.800
<v Speaker 15>when they determined that this particular book belongs to canon,

1692
01:46:09.720 --> 01:46:12.079
<v Speaker 15>Like what is the reliability of that perce it's the

1693
01:46:12.159 --> 01:46:12.600
<v Speaker 15>same as.

1694
01:46:12.600 --> 01:46:15.279
<v Speaker 9>The reliability that you you would use. Right, So I

1695
01:46:15.319 --> 01:46:16.960
<v Speaker 9>don't know if you did you hear the explanations or

1696
01:46:17.000 --> 01:46:19.520
<v Speaker 9>did you get booted out? Right? Jesus says, this is

1697
01:46:19.600 --> 01:46:21.640
<v Speaker 9>the work of God that you believe in him that

1698
01:46:21.680 --> 01:46:23.760
<v Speaker 9>he has sent John six twenty nine. So that wasn't

1699
01:46:24.079 --> 01:46:27.199
<v Speaker 9>me saying that it was quoting Christ calling faith at work.

1700
01:46:29.079 --> 01:46:31.319
<v Speaker 15>Okay, Yeah, I kind of got booted out by accident.

1701
01:46:31.479 --> 01:46:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Body here thatch okay. And then I said that Ephesians

1702
01:46:35.479 --> 01:46:38.439
<v Speaker 9>when it talks about the works or that we're not

1703
01:46:38.640 --> 01:46:41.000
<v Speaker 9>saved by works that we do, but by grace, that

1704
01:46:41.119 --> 01:46:43.640
<v Speaker 9>doesn't mean that there's not a requirement of us doing works.

1705
01:46:43.680 --> 01:46:46.319
<v Speaker 9>It means that our status and our interests into salvation

1706
01:46:46.520 --> 01:46:50.960
<v Speaker 9>is not something that we deserve or earned because Jesus

1707
01:46:51.079 --> 01:46:54.800
<v Speaker 9>saved us, right, Jesus died for us. We didn't tell

1708
01:46:54.880 --> 01:46:56.600
<v Speaker 9>him that what he needed to do, and we didn't

1709
01:46:56.640 --> 01:46:59.560
<v Speaker 9>earn his death. That was all done out of his

1710
01:47:00.800 --> 01:47:05.880
<v Speaker 9>over abundance of love for us. So, but that doesn't

1711
01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:10.159
<v Speaker 9>mean that I don't synergize with and work with God

1712
01:47:10.920 --> 01:47:13.760
<v Speaker 9>work out my salvation with fear and trembling, as Paul says.

1713
01:47:13.840 --> 01:47:17.359
<v Speaker 9>Paul says he's a co worker with Christ, and Paul

1714
01:47:17.439 --> 01:47:20.199
<v Speaker 9>says that the only faith that saves is the one

1715
01:47:20.239 --> 01:47:21.439
<v Speaker 9>that worketh through love.

1716
01:47:23.800 --> 01:47:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Fair point.

1717
01:47:24.920 --> 01:47:26.920
<v Speaker 15>So just another question before I move on to the

1718
01:47:27.199 --> 01:47:31.079
<v Speaker 15>actual Old Testament arguments that had so like the proudence

1719
01:47:31.159 --> 01:47:33.479
<v Speaker 15>in prices of like faith is what saves you. But

1720
01:47:33.680 --> 01:47:37.159
<v Speaker 15>like the words there they just like sanctify you, Like

1721
01:47:37.279 --> 01:47:39.680
<v Speaker 15>that's what you do after you get justified, right, So

1722
01:47:39.840 --> 01:47:40.520
<v Speaker 15>like do you agree with that?

1723
01:47:41.399 --> 01:47:45.239
<v Speaker 9>No, because justification in the Bible and in the ancient

1724
01:47:45.319 --> 01:47:48.760
<v Speaker 9>world was not a pure legal standing, and that's why

1725
01:47:48.920 --> 01:47:53.199
<v Speaker 9>Luther and the reformers needed the philosophy of nominalism, which

1726
01:47:53.359 --> 01:47:58.199
<v Speaker 9>divorced the actual reality from the name or the title

1727
01:47:58.319 --> 01:48:01.520
<v Speaker 9>of it. That's called nominalism. The ancient world didn't have

1728
01:48:01.600 --> 01:48:05.079
<v Speaker 9>nominalists really, So anybody who talked about in the ancient

1729
01:48:05.119 --> 01:48:08.880
<v Speaker 9>medieval world as being quote righteous or being just that

1730
01:48:09.039 --> 01:48:12.079
<v Speaker 9>meant they had the actual ontological power and quality of

1731
01:48:12.199 --> 01:48:14.279
<v Speaker 9>being that. It wasn't just a legal status.

1732
01:48:16.199 --> 01:48:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Fair point.

1733
01:48:17.159 --> 01:48:19.119
<v Speaker 15>So this is where I wanted to get into, like

1734
01:48:19.319 --> 01:48:23.239
<v Speaker 15>my arguments, let's say, like against the Orthodox Church. So

1735
01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:25.840
<v Speaker 15>you know the Orthodox Church they have a different Old

1736
01:48:25.840 --> 01:48:28.800
<v Speaker 15>Testament canon, and so I was just wondering, like sure,

1737
01:48:28.960 --> 01:48:31.319
<v Speaker 15>like you know, there's the idea that the church has

1738
01:48:31.439 --> 01:48:33.800
<v Speaker 15>the authority to decide, you know, the canon for the

1739
01:48:33.840 --> 01:48:36.760
<v Speaker 15>Old Testament New Testament, But what is the basis for

1740
01:48:37.479 --> 01:48:41.560
<v Speaker 15>accepting the Old Testament considering that, Like when I was

1741
01:48:41.600 --> 01:48:44.199
<v Speaker 15>doing research as well in my personal research, it showed

1742
01:48:44.239 --> 01:48:46.039
<v Speaker 15>that it led me to believe that a lot of

1743
01:48:46.079 --> 01:48:49.159
<v Speaker 15>the scholars right the books of the Old Testament they

1744
01:48:49.239 --> 01:48:51.680
<v Speaker 15>have been edited out and then like some of the

1745
01:48:51.760 --> 01:48:56.760
<v Speaker 15>authors are unknown. For example, even the Book of Isaiah.

1746
01:48:57.119 --> 01:48:59.000
<v Speaker 15>I think I had the Orthodox Study Bible that I have,

1747
01:48:59.239 --> 01:49:02.279
<v Speaker 15>Like they kind of just give a generic traditional answer,

1748
01:49:02.359 --> 01:49:03.479
<v Speaker 15>which doesn't really work.

1749
01:49:04.159 --> 01:49:05.239
<v Speaker 4>So for the Book of Isaiah, for.

1750
01:49:05.319 --> 01:49:08.279
<v Speaker 15>Example, I think the Orthodox City Bible does say that

1751
01:49:08.439 --> 01:49:12.079
<v Speaker 15>that it was written by the prophet Isaiah, but you

1752
01:49:12.159 --> 01:49:14.720
<v Speaker 15>know there's nothing like there's no good evidence.

1753
01:49:14.359 --> 01:49:16.279
<v Speaker 9>For it, and like all the how do you know that?

1754
01:49:16.720 --> 01:49:16.760
<v Speaker 14>No.

1755
01:49:16.880 --> 01:49:26.520
<v Speaker 9>In fact, the the Dead Sea Scrolls contained old ancient

1756
01:49:26.600 --> 01:49:30.920
<v Speaker 9>text of Isaiah. So I think the Dead Sea Scrolls

1757
01:49:31.079 --> 01:49:33.399
<v Speaker 9>is one of the things that is an attestation to

1758
01:49:33.479 --> 01:49:37.199
<v Speaker 9>the validity of Isaiah. And I mean you can say that,

1759
01:49:38.479 --> 01:49:39.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if you're going to read a bunch of

1760
01:49:39.720 --> 01:49:42.159
<v Speaker 9>like higher critical stuff I mean, they're going to say

1761
01:49:42.199 --> 01:49:46.000
<v Speaker 9>that any of the Protestant stuff you believe is also false.

1762
01:49:46.319 --> 01:49:50.600
<v Speaker 9>So I mean to use higher critical stuff to prove

1763
01:49:50.800 --> 01:49:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Protestantism unless you were an atheist. And maybe you're already atheism.

1764
01:49:53.800 --> 01:49:55.560
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, but to me, it seems like it's

1765
01:49:55.600 --> 01:50:01.720
<v Speaker 9>a double edged sword. Kov, what's up. The reason that

1766
01:50:01.800 --> 01:50:04.439
<v Speaker 9>the duoconomical texts are in the Bible is because the

1767
01:50:04.560 --> 01:50:10.560
<v Speaker 9>apostles have they used primarily the septuagent and the subtu

1768
01:50:10.640 --> 01:50:12.840
<v Speaker 9>agent included the dudo chronical texts, and that's why the

1769
01:50:12.880 --> 01:50:16.600
<v Speaker 9>Apostles cite and refer to the duo canon many many times.

1770
01:50:16.800 --> 01:50:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, Hey, j how are you doing?

1771
01:50:20.600 --> 01:50:22.000
<v Speaker 9>What's up? Man? I'm good? How are you?

1772
01:50:23.600 --> 01:50:23.640
<v Speaker 4>So?

1773
01:50:24.520 --> 01:50:27.960
<v Speaker 26>I was raised in a non denominational church, went to

1774
01:50:28.039 --> 01:50:29.359
<v Speaker 26>Sunday School, went.

1775
01:50:29.319 --> 01:50:32.840
<v Speaker 4>To youth church, and you know, whole manuorids.

1776
01:50:33.880 --> 01:50:35.479
<v Speaker 26>Kind of stopped going to church.

1777
01:50:35.680 --> 01:50:37.279
<v Speaker 4>It was, you know, very low church.

1778
01:50:38.479 --> 01:50:40.720
<v Speaker 26>So I didn't feel too bad about like not going

1779
01:50:40.760 --> 01:50:43.760
<v Speaker 26>when my parents weren't making me anymore. But recently I

1780
01:50:43.880 --> 01:50:46.359
<v Speaker 26>just had a daughter and I'm like, I, you know,

1781
01:50:46.439 --> 01:50:48.560
<v Speaker 26>I got to get my family back to church. So

1782
01:50:48.720 --> 01:50:52.079
<v Speaker 26>I start looking at non anominal churches near me, and

1783
01:50:52.159 --> 01:50:53.840
<v Speaker 26>I couldn't really find one, but I found.

1784
01:50:53.600 --> 01:50:55.000
<v Speaker 4>A bunch of other denominations.

1785
01:50:55.399 --> 01:50:59.520
<v Speaker 26>I started looking into those, and I realized I had

1786
01:50:59.800 --> 01:51:03.279
<v Speaker 26>no idea about theology. I just got a couple questions

1787
01:51:03.399 --> 01:51:07.560
<v Speaker 26>for you, Okay. So I heard a lot of like,

1788
01:51:07.760 --> 01:51:09.840
<v Speaker 26>you know, the canon and all that stuff.

1789
01:51:11.199 --> 01:51:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Was it just Martin Luther that took.

1790
01:51:13.600 --> 01:51:16.039
<v Speaker 26>The books out and now all Protestants follow that?

1791
01:51:18.560 --> 01:51:19.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, he was the first.

1792
01:51:20.159 --> 01:51:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1793
01:51:20.479 --> 01:51:25.720
<v Speaker 9>And then you had people who were humanists, and that

1794
01:51:25.800 --> 01:51:30.159
<v Speaker 9>doesn't mean secular humanists, but like Theodore Beza and Calvin

1795
01:51:30.640 --> 01:51:34.439
<v Speaker 9>and other reformers were very into a movement at that

1796
01:51:34.560 --> 01:51:37.000
<v Speaker 9>time called humanism, which was a desire to go back

1797
01:51:37.119 --> 01:51:41.319
<v Speaker 9>to the original texts, languages, and sources. So it was

1798
01:51:41.399 --> 01:51:45.319
<v Speaker 9>kind of a movement that amongst intellectuals at that time

1799
01:51:45.600 --> 01:51:49.880
<v Speaker 9>to prefer to look at, say, the Hebrew text versus

1800
01:51:50.319 --> 01:51:54.000
<v Speaker 9>the Greek translation of the subtu agent. So that also

1801
01:51:54.199 --> 01:51:58.199
<v Speaker 9>was part of the motivations. It wasn't just well to

1802
01:51:58.279 --> 01:52:01.199
<v Speaker 9>do what Luther said, right because Calvin and Calvin's not

1803
01:52:01.840 --> 01:52:03.600
<v Speaker 9>He might respect Luthor, but he's not going to just

1804
01:52:03.680 --> 01:52:06.239
<v Speaker 9>do it because Luther said it or did it. Calvin

1805
01:52:06.359 --> 01:52:09.199
<v Speaker 9>was a scholar of his own mind and devising, and

1806
01:52:09.319 --> 01:52:12.600
<v Speaker 9>so he was interested in going back to Hebrew and

1807
01:52:12.760 --> 01:52:15.680
<v Speaker 9>Greek texts, and that was part of the reason why

1808
01:52:15.760 --> 01:52:18.920
<v Speaker 9>they thought, well, that would lead us to the masoretic

1809
01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:22.439
<v Speaker 9>texts of the Jews versus the Canada Scripture that the

1810
01:52:22.920 --> 01:52:25.920
<v Speaker 9>that the Latin Papal Church had normalized.

1811
01:52:27.760 --> 01:52:28.119
<v Speaker 11>Got it?

1812
01:52:28.359 --> 01:52:29.199
<v Speaker 14>Okay, thank you?

1813
01:52:30.439 --> 01:52:32.760
<v Speaker 9>So I heard I've heard you.

1814
01:52:34.239 --> 01:52:37.279
<v Speaker 26>In past videos talk about, you know, the five solas.

1815
01:52:39.520 --> 01:52:44.960
<v Speaker 26>Now you are you just against sol scriptur and so or.

1816
01:52:46.800 --> 01:52:49.399
<v Speaker 4>Is there the other three that you I mean?

1817
01:52:49.479 --> 01:52:54.800
<v Speaker 9>I think the way that classical Protestantism brings the meanings

1818
01:52:54.840 --> 01:52:58.159
<v Speaker 9>of those terms out, the way it fleshes out the solas,

1819
01:52:58.239 --> 01:53:00.640
<v Speaker 9>we would as Orthodox disagree with all the solos the

1820
01:53:00.680 --> 01:53:01.520
<v Speaker 9>way they define them.

1821
01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:07.600
<v Speaker 11>Okay, Okay, Now something I hear.

1822
01:53:08.119 --> 01:53:10.880
<v Speaker 26>So basically, I'm a slow boy, and so learning like

1823
01:53:11.039 --> 01:53:13.279
<v Speaker 26>by reading is hard. I've been listening to a bunch

1824
01:53:13.319 --> 01:53:18.520
<v Speaker 26>of Christian apologetics and debates and stuff. So I hear

1825
01:53:18.880 --> 01:53:21.760
<v Speaker 26>a lot of Calvinists, and I'm sure many other.

1826
01:53:21.640 --> 01:53:22.920
<v Speaker 9>Protestants say this as well.

1827
01:53:23.039 --> 01:53:27.079
<v Speaker 26>But like they say like by or by grace through

1828
01:53:27.199 --> 01:53:32.199
<v Speaker 26>faith or something like that, and then they'll turn around

1829
01:53:32.279 --> 01:53:36.960
<v Speaker 26>and then say by faith alone. And I don't know

1830
01:53:37.039 --> 01:53:40.239
<v Speaker 26>if you've heard the by grace through faith.

1831
01:53:40.119 --> 01:53:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Or something like that.

1832
01:53:42.319 --> 01:53:44.720
<v Speaker 9>I used to be a Protestant with the prost seminary bro.

1833
01:53:46.640 --> 01:53:50.960
<v Speaker 4>So when they're saying that, what does that mean versus

1834
01:53:51.560 --> 01:53:52.920
<v Speaker 4>just so.

1835
01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:59.239
<v Speaker 9>The assumption is that human operation, energy and activity can

1836
01:53:59.359 --> 01:54:03.199
<v Speaker 9>in no way tribute to the root and ground of salvation,

1837
01:54:03.479 --> 01:54:07.079
<v Speaker 9>because this would be to detract from God's glory, in

1838
01:54:07.159 --> 01:54:10.359
<v Speaker 9>God's sovereignty, in God's grace in salvation. So, if you

1839
01:54:10.439 --> 01:54:13.239
<v Speaker 9>have anything to do with it in terms of the

1840
01:54:13.359 --> 01:54:17.520
<v Speaker 9>legal status of your justification and the imputation, you're basing

1841
01:54:17.640 --> 01:54:21.239
<v Speaker 9>your salvation on works. You're basing your salvation on yourself

1842
01:54:21.800 --> 01:54:24.680
<v Speaker 9>self worship, will worship, and you're detracting from God and

1843
01:54:24.760 --> 01:54:27.439
<v Speaker 9>you're worshiping yourself. It's an idol. This is the classic

1844
01:54:28.079 --> 01:54:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Protestant Reformation preachy way to go after any notion of

1845
01:54:35.279 --> 01:54:40.000
<v Speaker 9>synergy or synergism. Even though there's many arguments in many

1846
01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:43.159
<v Speaker 9>ways to combat this. I've listed several already. Tonight. Jesus

1847
01:54:43.239 --> 01:54:45.560
<v Speaker 9>calls faith a work in John six twenty nine. This

1848
01:54:45.720 --> 01:54:50.720
<v Speaker 9>is the work of God. Jesus says that when God speaks,

1849
01:54:51.359 --> 01:54:54.520
<v Speaker 9>it comes about right when God speaks to create the world.

1850
01:54:54.600 --> 01:54:57.479
<v Speaker 9>It happens. When God speaks into our hearts, it happens.

1851
01:54:57.840 --> 01:55:01.039
<v Speaker 9>So there's no such thing as God speaking and it

1852
01:55:01.199 --> 01:55:05.279
<v Speaker 9>not being efficacious. Oh, God calls your righteous, but you're

1853
01:55:05.399 --> 01:55:08.319
<v Speaker 9>filthy rags, You're an evil, wicked thing. But that's the

1854
01:55:08.399 --> 01:55:13.680
<v Speaker 9>actual basis of both Luther and Calvin's doctrine of justification

1855
01:55:13.880 --> 01:55:17.199
<v Speaker 9>by imputation and faith alone. Even the action of you

1856
01:55:17.319 --> 01:55:21.960
<v Speaker 9>believing in Luther or Calvin's system is not the basis

1857
01:55:22.359 --> 01:55:27.039
<v Speaker 9>of your salvation. That is also something God caused in you,

1858
01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:31.600
<v Speaker 9>and thus that removes you from having any contribution to

1859
01:55:31.760 --> 01:55:36.279
<v Speaker 9>the salvation. When you do good works and when you

1860
01:55:37.119 --> 01:55:44.840
<v Speaker 9>are sanctified, those are all flowing from the justification status

1861
01:55:44.960 --> 01:55:47.159
<v Speaker 9>that you got, which has nothing to do with you.

1862
01:55:48.039 --> 01:55:52.279
<v Speaker 9>So you do contribute to and cooperate in sanctification, but

1863
01:55:52.399 --> 01:55:57.199
<v Speaker 9>that sanctification process has absolutely nothing to do with the

1864
01:55:57.319 --> 01:56:02.520
<v Speaker 9>original justification status or the regeneration status. Even though Luther's

1865
01:56:02.520 --> 01:56:04.720
<v Speaker 9>a little inconsistent on that, Luther would just say, well,

1866
01:56:05.119 --> 01:56:07.600
<v Speaker 9>God caused you to get to the font. So even

1867
01:56:08.079 --> 01:56:12.680
<v Speaker 9>baptism regeneration in Luther's mind is still somewhat monargistic. Again

1868
01:56:13.039 --> 01:56:15.119
<v Speaker 9>read bonded to the will or read it twenty years ago.

1869
01:56:15.720 --> 01:56:19.399
<v Speaker 9>Luther believes that God's the direct cause of everything in

1870
01:56:19.479 --> 01:56:23.319
<v Speaker 9>your life, including the good and bad works. Calvin's not

1871
01:56:23.479 --> 01:56:26.640
<v Speaker 9>that extreme. He says, no, if there's anything good in

1872
01:56:26.720 --> 01:56:29.960
<v Speaker 9>your life, that's God, anything bad that's you. But even

1873
01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:33.279
<v Speaker 9>the good works are tainted, filthy rags in Calvin's view.

1874
01:56:33.560 --> 01:56:38.199
<v Speaker 9>So you see justification in the classical Protestant systems are

1875
01:56:38.399 --> 01:56:45.560
<v Speaker 9>very precise, they're very legal oriented. They're strictly legal status positions,

1876
01:56:46.600 --> 01:56:51.479
<v Speaker 9>not based on ontological realities. I'm not saying that the

1877
01:56:51.520 --> 01:56:55.359
<v Speaker 9>Protestant positions don't believe in antological change in you. They do,

1878
01:56:56.279 --> 01:57:00.359
<v Speaker 9>but the ontological change in you that ultimately, this sort

1879
01:57:00.359 --> 01:57:04.000
<v Speaker 9>of sanctification in your process of being made holy has

1880
01:57:04.119 --> 01:57:08.920
<v Speaker 9>nothing to do with your original justification legal status that

1881
01:57:09.159 --> 01:57:13.640
<v Speaker 9>is only on the basis of Christ's work and ultimately

1882
01:57:13.720 --> 01:57:16.279
<v Speaker 9>whether you're elect or not. And that's both Luther and

1883
01:57:16.479 --> 01:57:21.319
<v Speaker 9>Calvin's view because both believed in unconditional election because they

1884
01:57:21.439 --> 01:57:34.520
<v Speaker 9>followed Augustine very strictly. Okay, what's up, Jake Moore? Five dollars?

1885
01:57:34.600 --> 01:57:37.920
<v Speaker 9>I'm a Catholic, but for the win, very heavy, Jay,

1886
01:57:38.079 --> 01:57:42.279
<v Speaker 9>have very very I don't know what that means. Fw

1887
01:57:42.520 --> 01:57:46.920
<v Speaker 9>J heavy Hold on a second. What do you know about?

1888
01:57:47.479 --> 01:57:50.279
<v Speaker 9>Just one second? What do you like about Shamoon? What

1889
01:57:50.359 --> 01:57:55.840
<v Speaker 9>do you take issue with? Again, We've addressed this countless times.

1890
01:57:57.479 --> 01:58:00.319
<v Speaker 9>I've done many, many, many streams and talks, talked to

1891
01:58:00.439 --> 01:58:03.439
<v Speaker 9>Sam Schumann all the time. But Sam is at a

1892
01:58:03.479 --> 01:58:06.960
<v Speaker 9>position where he believes that all of the Apostolic churches

1893
01:58:07.039 --> 01:58:11.000
<v Speaker 9>have a sort of a common Apostolicity, but he doesn't

1894
01:58:11.039 --> 01:58:16.520
<v Speaker 9>believe in a single divine institution per se, and so

1895
01:58:16.960 --> 01:58:19.279
<v Speaker 9>he says he's not sure which of these. So I

1896
01:58:19.319 --> 01:58:21.479
<v Speaker 9>would take an issue with that because obviously I promote

1897
01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:25.039
<v Speaker 9>the Orthodox Church. Okay, what's up?

1898
01:58:25.960 --> 01:58:26.439
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Jay?

1899
01:58:26.520 --> 01:58:27.560
<v Speaker 9>How are you good?

1900
01:58:28.359 --> 01:58:30.239
<v Speaker 5>Nice to meet you man, I've been listening to you

1901
01:58:30.319 --> 01:58:32.159
<v Speaker 5>for years, we never actually spoke with you in person.

1902
01:58:33.640 --> 01:58:34.119
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thank you.

1903
01:58:34.600 --> 01:58:36.520
<v Speaker 5>So first, I just want to say glory to Jesus Christ,

1904
01:58:36.560 --> 01:58:39.079
<v Speaker 5>and I really hope that this conversation can be fruitful

1905
01:58:39.119 --> 01:58:41.560
<v Speaker 5>and we can both you know, remember that first and

1906
01:58:41.640 --> 01:58:43.479
<v Speaker 5>foremost as Christians, we need to treat each other and

1907
01:58:43.560 --> 01:58:48.800
<v Speaker 5>love and respect. So why is it that you get

1908
01:58:48.920 --> 01:58:50.680
<v Speaker 5>nervous as soon as you come up, but before you're

1909
01:58:50.720 --> 01:58:53.880
<v Speaker 5>like completely calm what so weird.

1910
01:58:54.880 --> 01:58:56.680
<v Speaker 9>No, I'm saying, Oh, I'll tell you. I think you're

1911
01:58:56.680 --> 01:58:57.119
<v Speaker 9>talking about me.

1912
01:58:57.159 --> 01:59:00.199
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, oh, no, you're you're a vetman. Yeah,

1913
01:59:01.720 --> 01:59:03.319
<v Speaker 5>So first I did want to ask you. So I

1914
01:59:03.399 --> 01:59:06.239
<v Speaker 5>was listening to your conversation the other day with that

1915
01:59:07.920 --> 01:59:13.279
<v Speaker 5>the Joseph guy, the Ben Joseph what was it?

1916
01:59:13.439 --> 01:59:14.520
<v Speaker 4>The was he Mormon?

1917
01:59:15.439 --> 01:59:17.880
<v Speaker 9>Oh? His name was Robert Gerr. You talking about that guy?

1918
01:59:18.680 --> 01:59:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, saying that like the Joseph and the New

1919
01:59:21.640 --> 01:59:22.359
<v Speaker 5>test Yes.

1920
01:59:22.640 --> 01:59:24.840
<v Speaker 9>The two messiahs that the Talmut has.

1921
01:59:24.960 --> 01:59:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, And I was just thinking.

1922
01:59:27.359 --> 01:59:29.199
<v Speaker 5>Well, maybe I'm a prophet because my middle name is Joseph.

1923
01:59:29.239 --> 01:59:31.319
<v Speaker 9>So there you go. How do we know it's not

1924
01:59:31.439 --> 01:59:33.720
<v Speaker 9>about you? Maybe it is, Hey, it could.

1925
01:59:33.560 --> 01:59:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Be God forbid. So I had a question in that conversation.

1926
01:59:38.319 --> 01:59:43.199
<v Speaker 5>And I am someone who believes, well, I used to

1927
01:59:43.239 --> 01:59:47.359
<v Speaker 5>believe very deeply in the pre sup based on the

1928
01:59:47.399 --> 01:59:49.880
<v Speaker 5>teachings of Van Till and Bonson. I got introduced to them,

1929
01:59:50.159 --> 01:59:52.720
<v Speaker 5>read their books. I've had some difficulties with it. So

1930
01:59:52.800 --> 01:59:54.920
<v Speaker 5>I was hoping first that maybe I could share with

1931
01:59:55.000 --> 01:59:58.399
<v Speaker 5>you some of my difficulties because I do believe that

1932
01:59:58.520 --> 02:00:03.000
<v Speaker 5>it debunks atheism, like atheism and agnoscissism, I do believe.

1933
02:00:03.079 --> 02:00:05.399
<v Speaker 4>My issue is how do I defend it.

1934
02:00:05.520 --> 02:00:10.239
<v Speaker 5>Against other transcendental justifications, other transcendental roundings, or when they

1935
02:00:10.359 --> 02:00:12.479
<v Speaker 5>do the whole like, well, I have a rock and

1936
02:00:12.560 --> 02:00:14.520
<v Speaker 5>his name is Paul, and he has all the attributes

1937
02:00:14.600 --> 02:00:16.560
<v Speaker 5>of the Christian God except for this one thing that

1938
02:00:16.680 --> 02:00:18.720
<v Speaker 5>he's like he lied once or something.

1939
02:00:18.880 --> 02:00:20.960
<v Speaker 9>Right. Well, we've addressed that, and I'm not saying this

1940
02:00:21.039 --> 02:00:23.039
<v Speaker 9>to be rude to you. We've addressed that many, many,

1941
02:00:23.079 --> 02:00:26.159
<v Speaker 9>many times, because many people have brought that up. And

1942
02:00:26.439 --> 02:00:31.760
<v Speaker 9>I argue that the Monson van Till crowd could only

1943
02:00:31.840 --> 02:00:34.439
<v Speaker 9>get so far with the argument because they had a

1944
02:00:34.560 --> 02:00:38.119
<v Speaker 9>defective Calvinist theology, so they didn't have a good Trinitarian

1945
02:00:38.199 --> 02:00:40.960
<v Speaker 9>model to work with. And also they didn't have a

1946
02:00:41.000 --> 02:00:43.920
<v Speaker 9>lot of the toolkit of the Christian metaphysics that we

1947
02:00:44.039 --> 02:00:48.560
<v Speaker 9>have as orthodox Orthodox theology and metaphysics is very vast

1948
02:00:48.800 --> 02:00:54.479
<v Speaker 9>and very it's a better toolkit. I don't have to

1949
02:00:54.600 --> 02:00:57.039
<v Speaker 9>say it. So when I make the tag argument, I

1950
02:00:57.239 --> 02:01:01.239
<v Speaker 9>argue that depending upon who I'm debating, but ultimately speaking,

1951
02:01:01.399 --> 02:01:05.039
<v Speaker 9>it's not just a defense of an abstract conception of

1952
02:01:05.399 --> 02:01:08.640
<v Speaker 9>a deity that reconciles one in many or an abstract

1953
02:01:08.680 --> 02:01:11.039
<v Speaker 9>deity that's like a math problem or something like that.

1954
02:01:11.640 --> 02:01:15.039
<v Speaker 9>You're actually arguing for the entire Christian worldview, and at

1955
02:01:15.119 --> 02:01:17.640
<v Speaker 9>times Vonton Eventil would actually say that that, they would

1956
02:01:17.640 --> 02:01:21.079
<v Speaker 9>actually make that point. So if that's the case, then

1957
02:01:22.079 --> 02:01:25.760
<v Speaker 9>the whole world view is actually grounded on trinitarian theology.

1958
02:01:26.399 --> 02:01:29.319
<v Speaker 9>And if orthodox Trinitarian theology is a correct Trinitarian theology,

1959
02:01:29.359 --> 02:01:32.640
<v Speaker 9>then you need orthodox trinitary theology and the metaphysics that

1960
02:01:32.680 --> 02:01:37.039
<v Speaker 9>flows from that. So you need the essence introducecinction, you

1961
02:01:37.199 --> 02:01:42.840
<v Speaker 9>need the low Gie doctrine for divine conceptualism. You need

1962
02:01:43.319 --> 02:01:45.760
<v Speaker 9>all kinds of things that are just not in the

1963
02:01:46.720 --> 02:01:50.760
<v Speaker 9>Calvinist mindset to make it work. To refute, furthermore, on

1964
02:01:50.880 --> 02:01:53.840
<v Speaker 9>a more basic level, when somebody says something like, oh, well,

1965
02:01:53.880 --> 02:01:56.359
<v Speaker 9>my rock, I have a rock that has all the

1966
02:01:56.399 --> 02:01:58.520
<v Speaker 9>same attributes, Well, first of all, it would not be

1967
02:01:58.680 --> 02:02:01.279
<v Speaker 9>the same attributes if it's a rock. A rock is

1968
02:02:01.319 --> 02:02:04.039
<v Speaker 9>a created thing, so to give the rock all the

1969
02:02:04.119 --> 02:02:07.560
<v Speaker 9>attributes of the Trinity would be absurd. But beyond that,

1970
02:02:07.720 --> 02:02:12.520
<v Speaker 9>it's even more flawed because the Christian paradigm is not

1971
02:02:12.760 --> 02:02:16.119
<v Speaker 9>just an abstract conceptual list of propositions or doctrines or

1972
02:02:16.159 --> 02:02:19.199
<v Speaker 9>ideas like math problems or sets or something like that.

1973
02:02:19.319 --> 02:02:23.039
<v Speaker 9>It's actually a historic religion, so you actually need the

1974
02:02:23.159 --> 02:02:26.920
<v Speaker 9>incarnational aspect, God stepping into time and space, the Son

1975
02:02:27.000 --> 02:02:29.920
<v Speaker 9>of God becoming man. That affects our view of history.

1976
02:02:30.000 --> 02:02:32.359
<v Speaker 9>God stepped into history, so history is now part of

1977
02:02:32.960 --> 02:02:37.319
<v Speaker 9>the Christian paradigm, you see. And so this atheist, this

1978
02:02:38.039 --> 02:02:42.000
<v Speaker 9>specuative view of the trinitarian rock God, would not have

1979
02:02:42.199 --> 02:02:45.159
<v Speaker 9>all the same attributes. It would also be an obvious

1980
02:02:45.279 --> 02:02:50.079
<v Speaker 9>copy paste from the already historically grounded and situated religion

1981
02:02:50.119 --> 02:02:50.840
<v Speaker 9>of Christianity.

1982
02:02:51.720 --> 02:02:53.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, do you have any books that I could read

1983
02:02:53.760 --> 02:02:55.840
<v Speaker 5>other than because I'm pretty much done with Bonton. I

1984
02:02:55.960 --> 02:02:58.680
<v Speaker 5>was reading his how he kind of interprets the van

1985
02:02:58.760 --> 02:03:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Til because man Till is very heavy, so he tries

1986
02:03:00.680 --> 02:03:03.159
<v Speaker 5>to come in and kind of interpret it for someone

1987
02:03:03.199 --> 02:03:05.359
<v Speaker 5>that's a little more late. But like you said, there's

1988
02:03:05.399 --> 02:03:07.720
<v Speaker 5>issues with that, and this dude just keeps repeating himself

1989
02:03:07.760 --> 02:03:09.239
<v Speaker 5>over and over. I'm like one hundred pages in and

1990
02:03:09.319 --> 02:03:12.439
<v Speaker 5>he said the same thing like twenty times. So do

1991
02:03:12.560 --> 02:03:15.720
<v Speaker 5>you have any other books that you would recommend for

1992
02:03:15.880 --> 02:03:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the precept that I could learn a.

1993
02:03:16.920 --> 02:03:20.880
<v Speaker 9>Little bit more honestly, not really not from them. I

1994
02:03:20.920 --> 02:03:24.319
<v Speaker 9>would say watch all of our old transcendental argument and

1995
02:03:25.000 --> 02:03:29.199
<v Speaker 9>precept videos going back last six years, because we get

1996
02:03:29.239 --> 02:03:31.800
<v Speaker 9>into all the all those questions, all those questions that

1997
02:03:32.560 --> 02:03:35.840
<v Speaker 9>all those questions that you're asking. You know, we actually

1998
02:03:36.600 --> 02:03:38.760
<v Speaker 9>have dealt with us for a long time. So that

1999
02:03:38.920 --> 02:03:41.439
<v Speaker 9>might be a better route than saying, oh, go read

2000
02:03:41.520 --> 02:03:43.439
<v Speaker 9>Bonson here, because Bonnson and Ben Tall are not going

2001
02:03:43.479 --> 02:03:46.520
<v Speaker 9>to deal with those questions. They don't have the tool

2002
02:03:46.600 --> 02:03:50.119
<v Speaker 9>kit to deal with it. Modernity, what's up? Even though,

2003
02:03:50.319 --> 02:03:53.880
<v Speaker 9>like you said, they did get so far with tag

2004
02:04:02.840 --> 02:04:05.119
<v Speaker 9>recovering areaan three dollars. In my opinion, the only thing

2005
02:04:05.239 --> 02:04:09.960
<v Speaker 9>left to debunk in the Protestants is conservative non Calvinist

2006
02:04:10.119 --> 02:04:13.720
<v Speaker 9>high churches that claim up so succession in Liturgic War.

2007
02:04:13.840 --> 02:04:17.720
<v Speaker 9>So Anglicans, well, that may be the case, but there's

2008
02:04:17.760 --> 02:04:19.600
<v Speaker 9>not a lot of those. I mean, I've had like

2009
02:04:19.720 --> 02:04:22.880
<v Speaker 9>maybe two Anglicans ever call into debate. So I mean,

2010
02:04:23.079 --> 02:04:25.680
<v Speaker 9>if that's what's left, then we're doing pretty good because

2011
02:04:26.039 --> 02:04:27.880
<v Speaker 9>there's not a lot of there's not a lot of

2012
02:04:27.960 --> 02:04:30.319
<v Speaker 9>loud Anglican voices. Although I did try to get that

2013
02:04:30.800 --> 02:04:34.239
<v Speaker 9>Black Day with Afro Calvin Robinson or whatever his name is.

2014
02:04:35.119 --> 02:04:38.239
<v Speaker 9>We were having exchanges back and forth before he did

2015
02:04:38.319 --> 02:04:43.920
<v Speaker 9>his faux tiny mustache man debacle thing, which was kind

2016
02:04:43.960 --> 02:04:48.279
<v Speaker 9>of ridiculous, and I think his Anglican synod made him

2017
02:04:48.279 --> 02:04:51.319
<v Speaker 9>step down. We're just in this is such a weird

2018
02:04:51.399 --> 02:04:56.119
<v Speaker 9>time to be alive where Kanye and Anglican black dudes

2019
02:04:56.199 --> 02:05:02.399
<v Speaker 9>are like doing Roman salutes and putting up tiny mustache

2020
02:05:02.479 --> 02:05:06.680
<v Speaker 9>man symbols. Like, it's just such a weird time to

2021
02:05:06.760 --> 02:05:08.399
<v Speaker 9>be alive. I don't even know how to process it.

2022
02:05:08.880 --> 02:05:12.239
<v Speaker 9>Like I'm not saying Calvin Robinson is a tiny mustache

2023
02:05:12.279 --> 02:05:15.840
<v Speaker 9>Man follower. I know he's not. But we were actually

2024
02:05:15.960 --> 02:05:18.560
<v Speaker 9>discussing having a kind of a debate, and then he

2025
02:05:18.720 --> 02:05:22.479
<v Speaker 9>just kind of wind and bitched about me challenging him

2026
02:05:22.520 --> 02:05:24.319
<v Speaker 9>to a debate when he said he would debate people.

2027
02:05:25.640 --> 02:05:28.760
<v Speaker 9>It's just and by the way, like to give a

2028
02:05:28.840 --> 02:05:31.000
<v Speaker 9>shout out to Dasha, I don't have anything against this

2029
02:05:31.119 --> 02:05:36.119
<v Speaker 9>girl she put up. By the way, she was on

2030
02:05:36.760 --> 02:05:39.000
<v Speaker 9>Sam Hyde's Perfect Guy Life, like right before I was

2031
02:05:39.119 --> 02:05:40.840
<v Speaker 9>like a week or two before me, maybe a month

2032
02:05:40.880 --> 02:05:44.760
<v Speaker 9>before me. I think she's an actress in some series.

2033
02:05:44.800 --> 02:05:49.199
<v Speaker 9>I forget what, But she went from being on the left,

2034
02:05:49.560 --> 02:05:52.279
<v Speaker 9>and she was part of Chapo Traphouse, remember that podcast.

2035
02:05:52.399 --> 02:05:56.399
<v Speaker 9>And then now she is going to an Eastern Catholic

2036
02:05:56.520 --> 02:05:59.760
<v Speaker 9>church and she's always tweeting about I'll debate anybody about

2037
02:05:59.760 --> 02:06:05.840
<v Speaker 9>worths like stuff, and I'm like, let's do it, and uh,

2038
02:06:05.960 --> 02:06:08.000
<v Speaker 9>I'm not going to be mean, and then she's like, oh,

2039
02:06:08.000 --> 02:06:10.079
<v Speaker 9>I'm not going to quarrel during lent during Lent and

2040
02:06:10.159 --> 02:06:12.199
<v Speaker 9>it's like, well, you just said you wanted to do it.

2041
02:06:12.359 --> 02:06:15.920
<v Speaker 9>So it's like people put these things out where they

2042
02:06:15.960 --> 02:06:18.600
<v Speaker 9>want to do this stuff, and Calvin Robinson did the

2043
02:06:18.640 --> 02:06:22.840
<v Speaker 9>same thing, and then when you say all right, let's

2044
02:06:22.920 --> 02:06:25.960
<v Speaker 9>do it, then suddenly they dash it. Whatever. She didn't

2045
02:06:25.960 --> 02:06:27.680
<v Speaker 9>do this, but that Calvin Robinson did it was oh

2046
02:06:27.800 --> 02:06:29.439
<v Speaker 9>look how look out what a piece of shit this

2047
02:06:29.560 --> 02:06:32.800
<v Speaker 9>dude is. So it's like, I want to put myself

2048
02:06:32.840 --> 02:06:35.760
<v Speaker 9>out there. I want to say I'm ready to debate anybody.

2049
02:06:35.840 --> 02:06:38.039
<v Speaker 9>When people actually then say they want a debate. Look

2050
02:06:38.039 --> 02:06:40.199
<v Speaker 9>at this piece of shit. Look at him. Oh he

2051
02:06:40.359 --> 02:06:42.880
<v Speaker 9>just wants attention. Dude, you're the one saying that you

2052
02:06:42.960 --> 02:06:47.239
<v Speaker 9>wanted this. What are you talking about. People on the

2053
02:06:47.319 --> 02:06:50.079
<v Speaker 9>internet are just insane, man, They just don't It's like

2054
02:06:52.079 --> 02:06:54.439
<v Speaker 9>and then everybody thinks I'm being mean. It's like, how

2055
02:06:54.479 --> 02:06:56.279
<v Speaker 9>am I being mean if I'm asking them to come

2056
02:06:56.359 --> 02:06:59.880
<v Speaker 9>have the discussion that they said they wanted, So now

2057
02:07:00.000 --> 02:07:02.279
<v Speaker 9>I just don't want it with you. That's what it is.

2058
02:07:02.560 --> 02:07:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Like.

2059
02:07:03.119 --> 02:07:05.319
<v Speaker 9>They want to have the discussion with a bunch of idiots.

2060
02:07:05.359 --> 02:07:08.279
<v Speaker 9>They don't want to have that with you. I feel

2061
02:07:08.319 --> 02:07:10.520
<v Speaker 9>like I feel like I'm turning into Quentin. They don't

2062
02:07:10.520 --> 02:07:12.720
<v Speaker 9>want to have that with me. Okay, I'm turning into

2063
02:07:12.840 --> 02:07:16.560
<v Speaker 9>freaking Quentin Tarantino. Okay, like we're gonna We're not gonna

2064
02:07:16.560 --> 02:07:19.399
<v Speaker 9>have that discussion because I'm gonna shut your butt down. Okay,

2065
02:07:19.760 --> 02:07:22.199
<v Speaker 9>you want to have discussion, but now with me, Okay,

2066
02:07:22.439 --> 02:07:25.479
<v Speaker 9>now with me, right, and let's just be freaking honest

2067
02:07:25.479 --> 02:07:31.800
<v Speaker 9>about that. Okay, I'm turning into Tarantino. Jamie, welcome back.

2068
02:07:33.800 --> 02:07:39.680
<v Speaker 9>Could you make me an espresso ex tanglia ten dollars?

2069
02:07:39.920 --> 02:07:43.560
<v Speaker 9>Smash the leg button Wi Fi Gospel. We already read that.

2070
02:07:43.720 --> 02:07:45.720
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me. I'm trying to make sure I didn't miss

2071
02:07:45.720 --> 02:07:50.880
<v Speaker 9>the super shit. I feel like I did. We got that,

2072
02:07:51.000 --> 02:07:56.560
<v Speaker 9>We got that, We got that, got that. Okay, we

2073
02:07:56.640 --> 02:07:59.279
<v Speaker 9>get more over here on YouTube, Thoughlet's say Joshua Strove

2074
02:07:59.359 --> 02:08:02.479
<v Speaker 9>into twenty Jay. I want to find an Orthodox church.

2075
02:08:02.600 --> 02:08:04.840
<v Speaker 9>There's a few in my area. What do I need

2076
02:08:04.920 --> 02:08:09.279
<v Speaker 9>to look for? Should I be aware of a humanism? Yeah,

2077
02:08:09.319 --> 02:08:11.159
<v Speaker 9>I mean I think that's the big you know, if

2078
02:08:11.239 --> 02:08:16.960
<v Speaker 9>he's if the priest seems you know, skittlesy or whatever,

2079
02:08:18.079 --> 02:08:20.000
<v Speaker 9>just go to the other one. But I always tell

2080
02:08:20.039 --> 02:08:23.159
<v Speaker 9>people don't worry about jurisdictions if you're new to Orthodoxy,

2081
02:08:23.239 --> 02:08:26.000
<v Speaker 9>because it's not really a thing you have to worry

2082
02:08:26.039 --> 02:08:29.680
<v Speaker 9>that much about. Like, if you're new, what you want

2083
02:08:29.720 --> 02:08:32.640
<v Speaker 9>to do is check all the churches in your area

2084
02:08:32.960 --> 02:08:34.720
<v Speaker 9>and find the one that's the best fit for you

2085
02:08:35.000 --> 02:08:38.239
<v Speaker 9>based on the priest and the people there, because that's

2086
02:08:38.279 --> 02:08:41.680
<v Speaker 9>going to be your family. So don't worry about internet

2087
02:08:42.520 --> 02:08:47.239
<v Speaker 9>drama or whatever unless it's something like really you know big,

2088
02:08:47.920 --> 02:08:50.119
<v Speaker 9>like I would stay away from LP to forests. He's

2089
02:08:50.159 --> 02:08:54.479
<v Speaker 9>a notorious you know, marches with BLM people. I mean,

2090
02:08:54.520 --> 02:09:01.880
<v Speaker 9>he's bad news. But don't worry about jurisdictions. Jason T.

2091
02:09:02.039 --> 02:09:05.319
<v Speaker 9>Five bucks, Thank you so much. Theology explore two dollars

2092
02:09:06.399 --> 02:09:10.439
<v Speaker 9>Hollywood requesting is from a reform background. Okay, I'll pull

2093
02:09:10.520 --> 02:09:16.399
<v Speaker 9>him up if he's still there. Hey, Jamie, could you

2094
02:09:16.479 --> 02:09:21.359
<v Speaker 9>make me an espresso? Thank you appreciate it. What's up man?

2095
02:09:21.399 --> 02:09:30.920
<v Speaker 9>You know I'm mute? Do you turn your mic on?

2096
02:09:35.039 --> 02:09:35.479
<v Speaker 7>I think.

2097
02:09:38.760 --> 02:09:54.399
<v Speaker 9>Hollywood? What's up date? Leo? Leo DiCaprio, Thomas b How

2098
02:09:54.439 --> 02:09:59.159
<v Speaker 9>are bishops that allow contraception or chrismate those who aren't

2099
02:09:59.279 --> 02:10:03.239
<v Speaker 9>triple and is to be reviewed? Hey?

2100
02:10:06.520 --> 02:10:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sorry, So I have a question. I don't know

2101
02:10:09.000 --> 02:10:10.319
<v Speaker 4>if it's properate to stream.

2102
02:10:10.119 --> 02:10:15.279
<v Speaker 26>Or not, but I was basically asking, so, with the transcendental.

2103
02:10:14.800 --> 02:10:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Argument, how did you make the jump from that?

2104
02:10:18.920 --> 02:10:21.720
<v Speaker 21>I have a stream on still, how did you get

2105
02:10:21.720 --> 02:10:23.960
<v Speaker 21>a jump from that to Christianity in the Bible?

2106
02:10:26.000 --> 02:10:29.039
<v Speaker 9>Because the argument is an argument for an entire worldview

2107
02:10:29.079 --> 02:10:32.880
<v Speaker 9>that includes a lot of metaphysical beliefs and ethical beliefs,

2108
02:10:33.000 --> 02:10:35.960
<v Speaker 9>And the argument is that the Christian worldview also provides

2109
02:10:36.039 --> 02:10:39.079
<v Speaker 9>the toolkit and the grounding for those metaphysical beliefs and

2110
02:10:39.119 --> 02:10:39.880
<v Speaker 9>ethical beliefs.

2111
02:10:43.279 --> 02:10:44.720
<v Speaker 14>Okay, yeah, this is a question.

2112
02:10:44.800 --> 02:10:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Really, I was going to debate something else, but.

2113
02:10:47.520 --> 02:10:51.159
<v Speaker 9>What's the other? So I'll get out? Thanks, what's the

2114
02:10:51.199 --> 02:10:51.920
<v Speaker 9>other topic? You want?

2115
02:10:51.960 --> 02:10:53.399
<v Speaker 4>But to that? No?

2116
02:10:53.680 --> 02:10:54.119
<v Speaker 7>He left?

2117
02:10:54.760 --> 02:11:02.600
<v Speaker 9>Okay, t K breaks five solas? Where's that guy? Is

2118
02:11:02.640 --> 02:11:06.279
<v Speaker 9>that that guy that's posting the trail of blood stupid

2119
02:11:06.319 --> 02:11:15.880
<v Speaker 9>stuff on the on Twitter. Oh my gosh, I've been

2120
02:11:15.920 --> 02:11:18.159
<v Speaker 9>asking that guy to come to Baate for months. Where's

2121
02:11:18.159 --> 02:11:21.039
<v Speaker 9>he at? Come on, dude, where are you at? Here's

2122
02:11:21.079 --> 02:11:24.079
<v Speaker 9>the here calling right here?

2123
02:11:24.119 --> 02:11:24.279
<v Speaker 4>Man?

2124
02:11:28.239 --> 02:11:31.479
<v Speaker 9>Is he five solas or five the chad solas? I

2125
02:11:31.560 --> 02:11:38.199
<v Speaker 9>forget this guy's name. It's like, t K, what's up?

2126
02:11:38.239 --> 02:11:38.359
<v Speaker 11>Man?

2127
02:11:38.359 --> 02:11:38.760
<v Speaker 9>I'm mute?

2128
02:11:46.359 --> 02:11:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Hey, what's up?

2129
02:11:46.880 --> 02:11:47.319
<v Speaker 12>Can you hear me?

2130
02:11:47.439 --> 02:11:47.560
<v Speaker 11>Yes?

2131
02:11:47.640 --> 02:11:47.760
<v Speaker 9>Sir?

2132
02:11:49.000 --> 02:11:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Hey, how's it going?

2133
02:11:50.720 --> 02:11:51.439
<v Speaker 9>What's on your mind?

2134
02:11:51.479 --> 02:11:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm new to the channel. I just tuned in.

2135
02:11:55.640 --> 02:12:03.079
<v Speaker 27>I saw the tag protestansm Protestantism is false, prove me wrong?

2136
02:12:05.159 --> 02:12:07.560
<v Speaker 4>So and then I heard you say something about your

2137
02:12:07.600 --> 02:12:08.880
<v Speaker 4>being like orthodox.

2138
02:12:09.239 --> 02:12:10.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so.

2139
02:12:12.319 --> 02:12:15.479
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that Orthodoxy is like the one true Church?

2140
02:12:15.880 --> 02:12:16.039
<v Speaker 9>Yes?

2141
02:12:17.239 --> 02:12:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah.

2142
02:12:19.960 --> 02:12:24.039
<v Speaker 27>Scripture would argue that I don't need to argue that,

2143
02:12:24.119 --> 02:12:27.680
<v Speaker 27>because Scripture argues that for me. Jesus himself says that

2144
02:12:28.600 --> 02:12:33.000
<v Speaker 27>he's against sectarianism, and I can tell you the verses.

2145
02:12:32.720 --> 02:12:37.640
<v Speaker 9>Two, right, But this is prior to that, because I

2146
02:12:37.680 --> 02:12:40.079
<v Speaker 9>would argue that the Orthodox Church is who put that

2147
02:12:40.199 --> 02:12:43.399
<v Speaker 9>Bible together. So the reason that he's against sectarianism is

2148
02:12:43.439 --> 02:12:46.399
<v Speaker 9>because he set up a College of Apostles who have

2149
02:12:46.560 --> 02:12:50.159
<v Speaker 9>successors who are his church. So anyone who's not the

2150
02:12:50.279 --> 02:12:52.920
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox Church is the sectarians that you're talking about.

2151
02:12:54.119 --> 02:12:58.119
<v Speaker 28>Yeah, I'm sure you've had this argument before, but what

2152
02:12:58.279 --> 02:13:00.920
<v Speaker 28>you just said is like self defeating because you just

2153
02:13:01.000 --> 02:13:03.399
<v Speaker 28>said that if they were the ones that set up

2154
02:13:03.479 --> 02:13:07.119
<v Speaker 28>the Bible, and in what is in the Bible is

2155
02:13:07.760 --> 02:13:10.319
<v Speaker 28>the most true, which I believe it to be the

2156
02:13:10.399 --> 02:13:15.079
<v Speaker 28>most true, then sectarianism is against Jesus' will?

2157
02:13:16.039 --> 02:13:17.800
<v Speaker 9>Correct, right? I agree?

2158
02:13:18.079 --> 02:13:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, So I don't know why you're like trying

2159
02:13:20.680 --> 02:13:21.439
<v Speaker 4>to be divisive.

2160
02:13:22.359 --> 02:13:24.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm not being divisive because I'm calling people to

2161
02:13:24.920 --> 02:13:30.000
<v Speaker 9>the unity of the same church that existed in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh,

2162
02:13:30.039 --> 02:13:32.520
<v Speaker 9>eighth centuries. So we believe the same as those people.

2163
02:13:33.079 --> 02:13:36.199
<v Speaker 9>That's the identical beliefs in church that we have today.

2164
02:13:36.680 --> 02:13:40.239
<v Speaker 9>So that shows that whatever Protestant sect you're in is

2165
02:13:40.319 --> 02:13:41.640
<v Speaker 9>the actual sectarianism.

2166
02:13:42.720 --> 02:13:46.319
<v Speaker 4>I never said I was in one. In what a

2167
02:13:46.439 --> 02:13:47.439
<v Speaker 4>Protestant sect?

2168
02:13:48.079 --> 02:13:49.039
<v Speaker 9>Okay, what are you in?

2169
02:13:50.319 --> 02:13:51.560
<v Speaker 4>I just follow the Bible?

2170
02:13:52.119 --> 02:13:55.399
<v Speaker 9>Wells that doesn't exist. That's even worse, because that's worse

2171
02:13:55.479 --> 02:13:58.800
<v Speaker 9>than a sectarian church that's you alone, that doesn't exist.

2172
02:14:02.119 --> 02:14:02.920
<v Speaker 4>It does exist.

2173
02:14:03.439 --> 02:14:07.359
<v Speaker 27>There's Bible, there's Bible churches. You can be a follower

2174
02:14:07.439 --> 02:14:10.119
<v Speaker 27>of Christ and not belong to specific sect.

2175
02:14:12.239 --> 02:14:17.880
<v Speaker 9>Jesus Jesus established. Jesus established a church, and that church.

2176
02:14:18.199 --> 02:14:20.560
<v Speaker 9>If you look at Paul's epistles first and second, Timothy

2177
02:14:21.239 --> 02:14:24.560
<v Speaker 9>is based around. In that case at Ephesus, the person

2178
02:14:24.640 --> 02:14:26.680
<v Speaker 9>that Paul laid his hands on, who is Timothy. And

2179
02:14:26.720 --> 02:14:30.239
<v Speaker 9>then Paul tells Timothy, don't pass on this apostolic deposit

2180
02:14:30.439 --> 02:14:33.279
<v Speaker 9>without laying hands on somebody who you know is approved,

2181
02:14:33.359 --> 02:14:35.640
<v Speaker 9>because it gives the gift of the Holy Spirit. That's

2182
02:14:36.000 --> 02:14:41.359
<v Speaker 9>apostolic succession. It mirrors the example in numbers eleven where

2183
02:14:41.399 --> 02:14:44.720
<v Speaker 9>Moses lays hands on the elders to give them authority

2184
02:14:44.840 --> 02:14:47.119
<v Speaker 9>and the spirit that Moses had, so the Holy Spirit

2185
02:14:47.159 --> 02:14:50.640
<v Speaker 9>goes from Moses to the seventy elders. That parallels the

2186
02:14:50.800 --> 02:14:55.039
<v Speaker 9>apostolic succession of the New Testament, particularly enacts one where

2187
02:14:55.079 --> 02:14:58.560
<v Speaker 9>you have a replacement for Judas, and it says that

2188
02:14:58.880 --> 02:15:03.479
<v Speaker 9>replaced his office or episcopate. That's episcopal church government. And

2189
02:15:03.600 --> 02:15:05.560
<v Speaker 9>that's why when I'm when I'm telling you, if you

2190
02:15:05.640 --> 02:15:08.399
<v Speaker 9>look at the church in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth,

2191
02:15:08.520 --> 02:15:13.560
<v Speaker 9>sixth seventh centuries. They don't teach evangelical do it yourself

2192
02:15:13.680 --> 02:15:17.239
<v Speaker 9>Bible church stuff. They believe in what the Orthodox Church teaches.

2193
02:15:17.399 --> 02:15:18.800
<v Speaker 9>So you're the sectarian.

2194
02:15:21.359 --> 02:15:24.279
<v Speaker 28>I don't believe so, because it's very clear in the

2195
02:15:24.720 --> 02:15:29.479
<v Speaker 28>even in the Apostles Creeds says they believe in the One.

2196
02:15:30.920 --> 02:15:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Catholic Church. What what do you think Catholic means?

2197
02:15:33.720 --> 02:15:36.680
<v Speaker 9>So we don't follow the Apostles creed? That's pseudonymous, that's

2198
02:15:36.720 --> 02:15:40.119
<v Speaker 9>a Western creed. You're talking about the nice you constant

2199
02:15:40.159 --> 02:15:44.760
<v Speaker 9>apolican Constantapolitan creed. It says one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

2200
02:15:44.840 --> 02:15:49.039
<v Speaker 9>That's the four marks? Does your strip mall Bible Church?

2201
02:15:49.319 --> 02:15:49.880
<v Speaker 9>The foremarts?

2202
02:15:50.960 --> 02:15:52.199
<v Speaker 4>But you didn't answer my question.

2203
02:15:52.960 --> 02:15:56.079
<v Speaker 9>I said, one Holy Catholic Episolic, the four Marks, that's

2204
02:15:56.119 --> 02:15:57.319
<v Speaker 9>what's necessary for the church.

2205
02:15:58.760 --> 02:16:00.720
<v Speaker 4>No, I asked you, what is Catholic mean?

2206
02:16:01.520 --> 02:16:05.640
<v Speaker 9>Fullness of truth? According to the fathers who Yes, it does,

2207
02:16:05.800 --> 02:16:08.720
<v Speaker 9>according to the fathers who composed that. That's what they

2208
02:16:08.800 --> 02:16:09.279
<v Speaker 9>interpret it.

2209
02:16:09.319 --> 02:16:09.479
<v Speaker 7>To me.

2210
02:16:10.399 --> 02:16:11.600
<v Speaker 4>No, it means universal.

2211
02:16:11.840 --> 02:16:14.479
<v Speaker 9>It means in the Orthodox Church, not just universality in

2212
02:16:14.560 --> 02:16:17.600
<v Speaker 9>terms of numbers. Because Roman Catholics make this argument that

2213
02:16:17.680 --> 02:16:20.359
<v Speaker 9>it means numbers in terms of universality. That's why I'm

2214
02:16:20.439 --> 02:16:25.520
<v Speaker 9>qualifying it with fullness of truth. That's what it means

2215
02:16:25.560 --> 02:16:28.640
<v Speaker 9>in the Orthodox Church. So it can't be numbers. Let

2216
02:16:28.680 --> 02:16:31.720
<v Speaker 9>me give an example why in the fourth century the

2217
02:16:31.800 --> 02:16:36.079
<v Speaker 9>majority of the church was aryan or semi arian. So

2218
02:16:36.280 --> 02:16:39.559
<v Speaker 9>you can't identify it with a large number of people

2219
02:16:40.280 --> 02:16:41.520
<v Speaker 9>the fullness.

2220
02:16:41.479 --> 02:16:45.000
<v Speaker 4>You're conflating like a heresy with Yeah.

2221
02:16:45.479 --> 02:16:48.159
<v Speaker 9>No, I'm not. I know this subject matter very well.

2222
02:16:48.200 --> 02:16:49.760
<v Speaker 9>I'm not conflating anything. I'm telling you.

2223
02:16:50.200 --> 02:16:52.079
<v Speaker 4>Because you've had these debates.

2224
02:16:51.799 --> 02:16:54.399
<v Speaker 9>Over and no, I've studied this for twenty plus years.

2225
02:16:54.520 --> 02:16:55.319
<v Speaker 9>It's not just abase.

2226
02:16:56.280 --> 02:17:00.639
<v Speaker 28>What you're having is willful ignorance, like you're choosing to

2227
02:17:00.879 --> 02:17:04.280
<v Speaker 28>disregard when people have told you in the past that

2228
02:17:04.559 --> 02:17:06.159
<v Speaker 28>Catholic means universal.

2229
02:17:06.319 --> 02:17:09.239
<v Speaker 9>No, I know what the word itself means. I'm giving

2230
02:17:09.280 --> 02:17:13.200
<v Speaker 9>you the Orthodox explanation that it's not just a universality

2231
02:17:13.360 --> 02:17:16.360
<v Speaker 9>sense of numbers. I'm giving you a deeper sense that

2232
02:17:16.479 --> 02:17:19.280
<v Speaker 9>the Orthodox theological tradition gives it. I know that I

2233
02:17:19.360 --> 02:17:21.680
<v Speaker 9>know what universality is. I learned this stuff twenty five

2234
02:17:21.760 --> 02:17:26.799
<v Speaker 9>years ago. Dude, yea, yeah, yeah, So why are you

2235
02:17:26.879 --> 02:17:30.639
<v Speaker 9>mocking me because of Your condescension and condescending attitude is

2236
02:17:30.719 --> 02:17:31.479
<v Speaker 9>getting on my nerves.

2237
02:17:31.639 --> 02:17:32.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm not being condescend you are.

2238
02:17:33.159 --> 02:17:35.559
<v Speaker 9>You're talking about that people have told me this in

2239
02:17:35.600 --> 02:17:38.000
<v Speaker 9>the past, and I wasn't rebuked properly and I didn't

2240
02:17:38.079 --> 02:17:40.040
<v Speaker 9>listen to them. What are you even talking about.

2241
02:17:40.840 --> 02:17:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not rebuking you.

2242
02:17:42.040 --> 02:17:44.479
<v Speaker 9>You said people in the past told me this, and

2243
02:17:44.600 --> 02:17:46.920
<v Speaker 9>I'm being arrogant and I need to be rebuked. That's

2244
02:17:46.959 --> 02:17:50.799
<v Speaker 9>what you're saying. Not being passive aggressive. Come on, get

2245
02:17:50.840 --> 02:17:51.959
<v Speaker 9>to your point. What's your argument.

2246
02:17:52.799 --> 02:17:54.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm not being passive aggressive either.

2247
02:17:54.840 --> 02:17:59.000
<v Speaker 9>One Holy Catholic Apostolic does not mean stripball Bible church

2248
02:17:59.159 --> 02:17:59.760
<v Speaker 9>like you believe.

2249
02:18:02.520 --> 02:18:03.959
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's that's just rude.

2250
02:18:05.920 --> 02:18:10.079
<v Speaker 9>Okay, it's rude. Fun, It doesn't matter. What's your argument.

2251
02:18:10.799 --> 02:18:12.440
<v Speaker 4>See, what you're doing is condescending.

2252
02:18:12.520 --> 02:18:14.239
<v Speaker 9>Stop doing the two quote now you want to do it.

2253
02:18:14.559 --> 02:18:16.760
<v Speaker 9>Stop telling policing. Get to the argument.

2254
02:18:16.799 --> 02:18:17.159
<v Speaker 4>This is so.

2255
02:18:19.280 --> 02:18:21.879
<v Speaker 9>Like you said, you belong to your own thing at

2256
02:18:21.879 --> 02:18:24.639
<v Speaker 9>a Bible church. That's what strip mall Bible churches are.

2257
02:18:24.959 --> 02:18:27.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's like super condescending.

2258
02:18:27.399 --> 02:18:29.440
<v Speaker 9>So you know, I feel like, well, you're making bad

2259
02:18:29.520 --> 02:18:32.559
<v Speaker 9>arguments because you started out wanting to argue that they

2260
02:18:33.120 --> 02:18:33.959
<v Speaker 9>stop interrupting.

2261
02:18:34.319 --> 02:18:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Is the Bible making bad arguments? Because I already told

2262
02:18:36.600 --> 02:18:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you that it's the Bible that No, it's not.

2263
02:18:39.000 --> 02:18:40.959
<v Speaker 9>You don't know. How do you have the right How

2264
02:18:40.959 --> 02:18:42.079
<v Speaker 9>do you know you have the right Bible?

2265
02:18:44.000 --> 02:18:45.520
<v Speaker 4>How do you know you have the right Bible?

2266
02:18:45.559 --> 02:18:47.520
<v Speaker 9>I can look to the Orthodox I can look to

2267
02:18:47.559 --> 02:18:50.479
<v Speaker 9>the Orthodox tradition and the canons of the Apostles that

2268
02:18:50.520 --> 02:18:51.319
<v Speaker 9>we pulled up earlier.

2269
02:18:52.079 --> 02:18:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmmm. And so they tell you it's like the

2270
02:18:54.239 --> 02:18:55.920
<v Speaker 4>King James or something.

2271
02:18:56.200 --> 02:18:59.600
<v Speaker 9>The King James, the Church Fathers. No, the canons of

2272
02:18:59.600 --> 02:19:02.319
<v Speaker 9>the appoll muscles are like the three hundreds. That's not

2273
02:19:02.360 --> 02:19:05.079
<v Speaker 9>going to be the King James. Goofas I know.

2274
02:19:05.200 --> 02:19:05.959
<v Speaker 4>I was choking.

2275
02:19:06.120 --> 02:19:08.559
<v Speaker 9>No, no, you didn't know what we're talking about. I'm

2276
02:19:08.559 --> 02:19:10.040
<v Speaker 9>talking about Apostolic Canon eighty five.

2277
02:19:10.120 --> 02:19:16.120
<v Speaker 4>You know what that is? The Apostolic Canon eighty five?

2278
02:19:16.280 --> 02:19:18.840
<v Speaker 9>No, I don't know, right, So you are joking, you

2279
02:19:18.920 --> 02:19:19.479
<v Speaker 9>have no idea?

2280
02:19:21.200 --> 02:19:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I was joking about the King James thing.

2281
02:19:23.159 --> 02:19:24.760
<v Speaker 9>Okay, how do you know that you have the right

2282
02:19:24.840 --> 02:19:25.719
<v Speaker 9>Protestant Bible?

2283
02:19:27.920 --> 02:19:29.479
<v Speaker 4>Okay, how do you know that I'm a Protestant.

2284
02:19:29.479 --> 02:19:32.479
<v Speaker 9>That's a too My gosh, this is too stupid. We're done.

2285
02:19:33.719 --> 02:19:33.959
<v Speaker 4>Bye.

2286
02:19:35.399 --> 02:19:53.040
<v Speaker 9>That was the dumbest guy I've ever talked to. Nick. Nick. Yeah,

2287
02:19:57.280 --> 02:20:00.040
<v Speaker 9>let's all Jay. Yeah, my bad. I don't know what

2288
02:20:00.159 --> 02:20:00.959
<v Speaker 9>happened earlier.

2289
02:20:02.680 --> 02:20:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Because I got booted out as soon as I answered

2290
02:20:05.360 --> 02:20:06.239
<v Speaker 4>I asked my question.

2291
02:20:07.079 --> 02:20:12.639
<v Speaker 14>But all right, can I want to go? I want

2292
02:20:12.639 --> 02:20:12.959
<v Speaker 14>to ask the.

2293
02:20:13.040 --> 02:20:16.559
<v Speaker 9>Question real quick, okay, and make it quick. Come on, yeah,

2294
02:20:18.719 --> 02:20:22.319
<v Speaker 9>go real quick.

2295
02:20:22.360 --> 02:20:23.920
<v Speaker 24>I know I started as a Protestant, and I'm looking

2296
02:20:23.920 --> 02:20:26.799
<v Speaker 24>into the Orthodox Faith because I finally looked into early

2297
02:20:26.920 --> 02:20:27.719
<v Speaker 24>Church history.

2298
02:20:27.520 --> 02:20:31.120
<v Speaker 4>And saw my beliefs like fold before my eyes. So

2299
02:20:31.319 --> 02:20:32.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm in shocked right now.

2300
02:20:32.600 --> 02:20:36.000
<v Speaker 24>But I kind of want to ask, real quick, if

2301
02:20:36.040 --> 02:20:38.719
<v Speaker 24>you can start all over in your journey and and

2302
02:20:38.840 --> 02:20:39.879
<v Speaker 24>learn Orthodox faith.

2303
02:20:39.920 --> 02:20:42.559
<v Speaker 4>But what would you do from the very beginning. You

2304
02:20:42.600 --> 02:20:44.600
<v Speaker 4>don't have to go on like a long like like

2305
02:20:44.879 --> 02:20:46.159
<v Speaker 4>right away read the Early Church.

2306
02:20:46.200 --> 02:20:50.280
<v Speaker 9>Father'll take my time and not rush into it. Start

2307
02:20:50.360 --> 02:20:52.440
<v Speaker 9>by reading Athanacious. Start by reading
