WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.439 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomie podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:23.839
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Imagine an explosion so violent, I mean, just so incomprehensibly

8
00:00:32.719 --> 00:00:37.399
<v Speaker 2>massive that it outshines all the stars in the observable universe.

9
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Combined, every single one.

10
00:00:38.759 --> 00:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want you to picture an event that releases

11
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>more energy in a fraction of a second than our

12
00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:48.399
<v Speaker 2>own sun will produce in its entire what ten billion

13
00:00:48.479 --> 00:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>year lifespan exactly. And yet if you were, say, floating

14
00:00:51.640 --> 00:00:53.439
<v Speaker 2>in space right next to it, you wouldn't see a

15
00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>blinding flash, you wouldn't hear a deafening roar.

16
00:00:56.159 --> 00:00:59.159
<v Speaker 3>Nothing. It happens in complete pitch black.

17
00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Silence, which is just to wrap your head around. The

18
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:03.359
<v Speaker 2>only way you would even know it occurred is that

19
00:01:03.399 --> 00:01:06.599
<v Speaker 2>the literal fabric of space and time around you would

20
00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:08.239
<v Speaker 2>stretch and squeeze right.

21
00:01:08.239 --> 00:01:10.519
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't just feel it. The actual geometry of your

22
00:01:10.560 --> 00:01:12.239
<v Speaker 3>own body would momentarily distort.

23
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's unpack this. Uh huh, because yesterday July first,

24
00:01:15.799 --> 00:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, our understanding of the universe fundamentally change.

25
00:01:19.400 --> 00:01:20.079
<v Speaker 3>You really did.

26
00:01:20.239 --> 00:01:23.040
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at the release of the Gravitational Wave Transient

27
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Catalog five point zero or GWTC five, and the sheer

28
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:30.159
<v Speaker 2>scale of what we were talking about here is almost

29
00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>difficult to process.

30
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>It's staggering.

31
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:35.439
<v Speaker 2>We are talking about one hundred and sixty one newly

32
00:01:35.480 --> 00:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>identified black hole collisions and this was detected in just

33
00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:42.599
<v Speaker 2>a ten month window, right between April twenty twenty four

34
00:01:42.959 --> 00:01:44.519
<v Speaker 2>and January twenty twenty five.

35
00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it is a monumental threshold for astrophysics. I

36
00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>mean to put that in perspective. Those one hundred and

37
00:01:49.879 --> 00:01:53.519
<v Speaker 3>sixty one new events bring our total number of known

38
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:58.799
<v Speaker 3>confirmed black hole collisions to a staggering three ninety wow,

39
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:01.599
<v Speaker 3>three ninety Right. We are no longer in the era

40
00:02:01.760 --> 00:02:05.280
<v Speaker 3>of viewing black hole mergers as these incredibly rare, you know,

41
00:02:05.760 --> 00:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>one off anomalies that we might catch if we're extremely lucky.

42
00:02:08.960 --> 00:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, We're not just hoping to get lucky anymore. We're

43
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>practically taking a census.

44
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, we are uncovering an entire hidden population because for

45
00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:21.199
<v Speaker 3>the longest time, astrophysis was fundamentally constrained by the electromagnetic.

46
00:02:20.439 --> 00:02:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Spectrum meaning light.

47
00:02:21.719 --> 00:02:24.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, light, If you think about it, everything we knew

48
00:02:24.199 --> 00:02:27.240
<v Speaker 3>about the cosmos came from catching light, radio waves, X rays,

49
00:02:27.360 --> 00:02:30.919
<v Speaker 3>visible light. But black holes, by definition, trap light. They

50
00:02:30.919 --> 00:02:32.759
<v Speaker 3>are the ultimate cosmic ghosts.

51
00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Because the gravity is so strong, nothing escapes, right, so we.

52
00:02:36.879 --> 00:02:40.479
<v Speaker 3>Only knew they existed because of how their gravity bullied

53
00:02:40.479 --> 00:02:43.039
<v Speaker 3>the matter around them. You know, stars whipping around an

54
00:02:43.080 --> 00:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>invisible center, or accretion disks of superheated gas glowing as

55
00:02:47.520 --> 00:02:48.199
<v Speaker 3>they fell.

56
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:50.319
<v Speaker 2>In, like seeing the wind blowing through trees rather than

57
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>seeing the wind itself.

58
00:02:51.479 --> 00:02:53.599
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to put it. But when two

59
00:02:53.719 --> 00:02:57.039
<v Speaker 3>black holes collide in a dark, empty void, there is

60
00:02:57.199 --> 00:03:02.159
<v Speaker 3>no light to catch, total silence. Well until we learn

61
00:03:02.199 --> 00:03:03.639
<v Speaker 3>how to listen to gravity itself.

62
00:03:03.719 --> 00:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And the reason you need to know about this today

63
00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:10.599
<v Speaker 2>is that we are crossing from a period of discovery

64
00:03:10.639 --> 00:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>into a period of archaeology. Oh absolutely, It is like

65
00:03:13.280 --> 00:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>we just mapped the ruins of a lost cosmic civilization

66
00:03:17.080 --> 00:03:19.199
<v Speaker 2>and now we actually have enough data to understand how

67
00:03:19.199 --> 00:03:21.439
<v Speaker 2>they lived, how they grew and how they.

68
00:03:21.319 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Died, which is the most exciting part.

69
00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:25.479
<v Speaker 2>But before we get into the record breaking, just mind

70
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:28.719
<v Speaker 2>bending specifics at TWTC five, we have to talk about

71
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:31.199
<v Speaker 2>the how I mean a decade ago, in twenty fifteen,

72
00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the very first detection of gravitational waves happens.

73
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Right, the one that proved Einstein write a century after

74
00:03:36.240 --> 00:03:38.479
<v Speaker 3>he proposed general relativity exactly.

75
00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:41.759
<v Speaker 2>But going from one detection a decade ago to what

76
00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>three or four a week today? How are we doing that?

77
00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>So the engine driving this revolution is the International LVK Collaboration. Okay,

78
00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:52.439
<v Speaker 3>that is LIGO in the United States, which operates to

79
00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>massive detectors in Washington State and Louisiana. Then there's Virgo

80
00:03:56.960 --> 00:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>in Italy and KARA in Japan.

81
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And these are those massive L shaped vacuum tubes.

82
00:04:03.280 --> 00:04:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, kilometers long where we fire lasers back and

83
00:04:06.680 --> 00:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>forth to measure the stretching of space time. But to

84
00:04:09.479 --> 00:04:12.599
<v Speaker 3>understand why we are suddenly catching multiple events a week,

85
00:04:12.840 --> 00:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>you really have to look at the unsung heroes of

86
00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the hardware.

87
00:04:15.599 --> 00:04:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Who are they?

88
00:04:16.360 --> 00:04:19.319
<v Speaker 3>Specifically the researchers at the University of Glasgow. They have

89
00:04:19.399 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>been working on gravitational wave science since the nineteen seventies.

90
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Wait, the seventies, long before we had any proof these

91
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>waves could actually be detected exactly long. I imagine dedicating

92
00:04:29.519 --> 00:04:31.759
<v Speaker 2>forty years of your career to building parts for a

93
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:34.759
<v Speaker 2>machine to detect something that might not even be measurable.

94
00:04:34.800 --> 00:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>It takes a lot of faith in the math.

95
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to drill down into what they actually built,

96
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>because I know it's not just a matter of pointing

97
00:04:40.319 --> 00:04:42.879
<v Speaker 2>a telescope at this guy. They had to solve an

98
00:04:42.920 --> 00:04:45.759
<v Speaker 2>absolute mechanical engineering nightmare.

99
00:04:45.839 --> 00:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, a total nightmare. What's fascinating here is that the

100
00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:52.879
<v Speaker 3>core of the problem is isolation. The Earth is a

101
00:04:52.920 --> 00:04:54.519
<v Speaker 3>remarkably noisy planet.

102
00:04:54.759 --> 00:04:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Right.

103
00:04:55.160 --> 00:04:58.879
<v Speaker 3>You have trucks striving on highways miles away. You have

104
00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:04.959
<v Speaker 3>ocean wavesrushing against the continental shelf. You have continuous micro seismic.

105
00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Tremors, constant vibration.

106
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Always even the wind pushing against the observatory buildings creates

107
00:05:10.199 --> 00:05:14.519
<v Speaker 3>ground tilt. If you just bolted a highly sensitive mirror

108
00:05:14.560 --> 00:05:16.920
<v Speaker 3>to the floor, it would shake violently.

109
00:05:16.959 --> 00:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>And we were trying to measure what a change in

110
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>distance caused by a gravitational wave that is smaller than

111
00:05:22.680 --> 00:05:24.079
<v Speaker 2>a fraction of an atomic.

112
00:05:23.759 --> 00:05:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Nucleus, Right, so the background noise of the Earth is

113
00:05:26.879 --> 00:05:29.800
<v Speaker 3>orders of magnitude louder than the signal we want.

114
00:05:29.920 --> 00:05:32.160
<v Speaker 2>It's like trying to hear a single pin drop in

115
00:05:32.199 --> 00:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the middle of a roaring hurricane using a microphone. You've

116
00:05:35.079 --> 00:05:36.120
<v Speaker 2>suspended by a thread.

117
00:05:36.319 --> 00:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>That is exactly what it's like.

118
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:40.199
<v Speaker 2>So how do you separate the mirror from the planet

119
00:05:40.199 --> 00:05:40.839
<v Speaker 2>it's sitting on.

120
00:05:41.319 --> 00:05:43.839
<v Speaker 3>You suspend it. But you can't just hang it with

121
00:05:43.920 --> 00:05:44.639
<v Speaker 3>steel wire?

122
00:05:44.839 --> 00:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Why not?

123
00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Because steel has internal friction. When atoms in a metal

124
00:05:49.519 --> 00:05:53.759
<v Speaker 3>wire rub against each other, they generate thermal noise, microscopic

125
00:05:53.879 --> 00:05:56.759
<v Speaker 3>vibrations that would travel right down to the mirror and

126
00:05:56.839 --> 00:06:00.079
<v Speaker 3>mimic a gravitational wave. Ah okay, So the Glasgow Tea

127
00:06:00.199 --> 00:06:05.279
<v Speaker 3>solution was to develop ultrasensitive mirror suspensions using fused silica,

128
00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:07.600
<v Speaker 3>essentially extremely pure glass.

129
00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Wait, they are hanging forty kilogram optical mirrors with glass thread.

130
00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they literally pull these fused silica threads so they

131
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>are incredibly thin, and then they physically weld them to

132
00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>the sides of the mirrors.

133
00:06:20.959 --> 00:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

134
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:25.439
<v Speaker 3>It's called a monolithic suspension because it's glass to glass.

135
00:06:25.480 --> 00:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>There are no joints, no clamps, and virtually no mechanical.

136
00:06:29.240 --> 00:06:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Friction, which means no thermal noise.

137
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Exactly when you eliminate that friction, you eliminate a massive

138
00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:40.279
<v Speaker 3>source of the noise. The mirror essentially floats, completely decoupled

139
00:06:40.279 --> 00:06:43.480
<v Speaker 3>from the chaotic molecular vibrations of the Earth. That's incredibly

140
00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it's perfectly still waiting for the fabric of the universe

141
00:06:46.519 --> 00:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>itself to ripple through it.

142
00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I just want to pause on that image for a second.

143
00:06:50.959 --> 00:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>We have a forty kilogram mirror hanging by glass threads,

144
00:06:55.079 --> 00:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>isolated so perfectly that it doesn't feel a truck driving

145
00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>by outside, but it does feel two black holes crashing

146
00:07:02.800 --> 00:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>into each other a billion light years away.

147
00:07:04.839 --> 00:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>It's beautiful engineering, and it goes even deeper than mechanical isolation.

148
00:07:10.040 --> 00:07:12.319
<v Speaker 3>We also have to fight quantum noise, right.

149
00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Because when you get down to measurements smaller than a proton,

150
00:07:15.519 --> 00:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the universe just stops playing by normal rules. The Heisenberg

151
00:07:18.680 --> 00:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty principle kicks in.

152
00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Exactly at that scale, you can't know both the phase

153
00:07:23.720 --> 00:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and the amplitude of the laser light with perfect precision.

154
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Right empty space itself is boiling with quantum vacuum fluctuations,

155
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>virtual particles popping in and out of existence, randomly kicking the.

156
00:07:34.879 --> 00:07:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Mirrors, which is just wild.

157
00:07:36.800 --> 00:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>It is, so the observatories use a technique called quantum squeezing.

158
00:07:40.879 --> 00:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>They literally manipulate the quantum state of the laser light.

159
00:07:44.199 --> 00:07:46.720
<v Speaker 3>They choose to accept more uncertainty in a variable they

160
00:07:46.720 --> 00:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>don't care about, like the phase, so they can squeeze

161
00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:51.399
<v Speaker 3>down the uncertainty in the amplitude because.

162
00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The amplitude is what they actually need to measure.

163
00:07:53.399 --> 00:07:54.759
<v Speaker 3>The wave precisely.

164
00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like squeezing a balloon. You squeeze it in the

165
00:07:57.600 --> 00:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>middle to make it narrower where you need it to be,

166
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>but it bulges out at the ends. We are physically

167
00:08:03.279 --> 00:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>pushing the quantum fuzziness out of the way of our measurement.

168
00:08:07.199 --> 00:08:11.319
<v Speaker 3>That's a perfect analogy, and it's this relentless, obsessive upgrading

169
00:08:11.360 --> 00:08:15.279
<v Speaker 3>that gives us catalogs like GWTC five. What's fascinating here

170
00:08:15.399 --> 00:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>is the way the validation cycle works.

171
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

172
00:08:17.519 --> 00:08:20.759
<v Speaker 3>So the LVK collaboration operates in cycles. They don't just

173
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:23.720
<v Speaker 3>run the machines forever. They have observing runs and then

174
00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:26.839
<v Speaker 3>they completely shut down for months of commissioning right to

175
00:08:26.879 --> 00:08:30.839
<v Speaker 3>install the upgrades. Exactly. They install better lasers, heavier mirrors,

176
00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:34.679
<v Speaker 3>better quantum squizzers, and more advanced glass extensions, and every

177
00:08:34.759 --> 00:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>time they turn the network back on, the sensitivity volume,

178
00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:39.960
<v Speaker 3>meaning the total amount of space we can listen to,

179
00:08:40.519 --> 00:08:42.679
<v Speaker 3>increases by a massive cube factor.

180
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but here's the question that always trips me up.

181
00:08:45.080 --> 00:08:48.399
<v Speaker 2>We have this hyper sensitive glass pendulum and it wiggles.

182
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:51.799
<v Speaker 2>How did the scientist actually sitting at the computers know

183
00:08:52.039 --> 00:08:54.559
<v Speaker 2>for sure that the wiggle was a black hole in

184
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>another galaxy and not just a weird microscopic thermal burp

185
00:08:58.399 --> 00:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in the glass or a rogue quantum fluctuation that slipped

186
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:03.039
<v Speaker 2>through the squeezing well.

187
00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:06.159
<v Speaker 3>That is the defining challenge of data analysis in this field.

188
00:09:06.639 --> 00:09:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Finding a gravitational wave isn't just looking for a bump

189
00:09:09.679 --> 00:09:10.320
<v Speaker 3>on a graph.

190
00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:11.320
<v Speaker 2>What are they looking for?

191
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:14.759
<v Speaker 3>You are searching for a highly specific mathematical pattern called

192
00:09:14.799 --> 00:09:15.279
<v Speaker 3>a chirp.

193
00:09:15.399 --> 00:09:15.919
<v Speaker 2>A chirp.

194
00:09:16.120 --> 00:09:19.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. As two black holes spiral closer and closer together,

195
00:09:19.679 --> 00:09:23.879
<v Speaker 3>they orbit faster and faster. This causes the gravitational waves

196
00:09:23.919 --> 00:09:26.879
<v Speaker 3>they emit to increase in both frequency so the pitch

197
00:09:26.960 --> 00:09:29.519
<v Speaker 3>goes up and amplitude so it gets louder.

198
00:09:29.799 --> 00:09:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can picture that it looks like a.

199
00:09:31.440 --> 00:09:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Very distinct sweeping curve in the data, and to quantify

200
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:38.559
<v Speaker 3>their confidence, researchers rely on a metric called the signal

201
00:09:38.559 --> 00:09:40.519
<v Speaker 3>to noise ratio or SNR.

202
00:09:40.799 --> 00:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So, if the background noise of the instrument is the

203
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:46.159
<v Speaker 2>static on an old analog TV, the signal is the

204
00:09:46.200 --> 00:09:49.919
<v Speaker 2>actual broadcast trying to punch through exactly. For anyone familiar

205
00:09:49.919 --> 00:09:52.679
<v Speaker 2>with signal processing, what is the usual baseline for claiming

206
00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:53.519
<v Speaker 2>a real detection?

207
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:57.279
<v Speaker 3>For a typical gravitational wave detection, an SNR of around

208
00:09:57.360 --> 00:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>eight or ten is usually the threshold where the team

209
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:02.240
<v Speaker 3>feels colm that they have a real astrophysical event.

210
00:10:02.480 --> 00:10:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, eight or ten means it's real, not just a

211
00:10:04.759 --> 00:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>random statistical fluctuation of the noise floor. Which sets the

212
00:10:08.639 --> 00:10:13.519
<v Speaker 2>stage perfectly for the absolute bombshell of the GWTC five catalog,

213
00:10:13.960 --> 00:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>because we are moving from the general how of detection

214
00:10:17.519 --> 00:10:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to a specific event that I can only describe as

215
00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:23.559
<v Speaker 2>the loudest whisper in the cosmos. Oh, let's talk about

216
00:10:23.639 --> 00:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>January fourteen, twenty twenty.

217
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Five, event GW two five zero one one two. This

218
00:10:28.559 --> 00:10:30.519
<v Speaker 3>is an event that will be heavily cited in physics

219
00:10:30.519 --> 00:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>textbooks for decades. Really, oh absolutely, The black holes involved

220
00:10:34.480 --> 00:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>were massive, roughly thirty two and thirty four times the

221
00:10:37.519 --> 00:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>mass of our sun. They collided over a billion light

222
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>years away. But the defining characteristic wasn't just the mass,

223
00:10:43.240 --> 00:10:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it was the clarity.

224
00:10:44.320 --> 00:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you just said an SNR of eight is a

225
00:10:46.159 --> 00:10:49.039
<v Speaker 2>solid detection. What did GW two five zero one one

226
00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>fourteen come in at?

227
00:10:50.159 --> 00:10:52.720
<v Speaker 3>It achieved a record breaking signal to noise ratio of

228
00:10:52.759 --> 00:10:54.399
<v Speaker 3>seventy six point nine seventy.

229
00:10:54.159 --> 00:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Six point nine. I mean, mathematically, that isn't just peaking

230
00:10:57.480 --> 00:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>above the noise floor, that is standing on a map

231
00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:02.919
<v Speaker 2>out with a megaphone. If an SNR of eight is

232
00:11:02.960 --> 00:11:06.559
<v Speaker 2>a blurry, grainy polaroid of a black hole, an SNR

233
00:11:06.639 --> 00:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of seventy six point nine is like a four K

234
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:12.120
<v Speaker 2>ultra high definition uncompressed video.

235
00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:15.440
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what it is. It is the clearest gravitational

236
00:11:15.440 --> 00:11:18.519
<v Speaker 3>wave signal humanity has ever recorded. And when you have

237
00:11:18.559 --> 00:11:22.279
<v Speaker 3>a signal that pristine, the entire nature of the science shifts.

238
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Howso you transition from merely cataloging the demographics of black

239
00:11:26.360 --> 00:11:29.960
<v Speaker 3>holes to fundamentally stress testing the laws of physics. Doctor

240
00:11:30.039 --> 00:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>John Vache, a researcher analyzing these signals at the University

241
00:11:33.039 --> 00:11:36.519
<v Speaker 3>of Glasgow, noted that this unprecedented loudness allowed them to

242
00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>perform the most precise test of general relativity today.

243
00:11:39.919 --> 00:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what are we actually testing? Though we know general

244
00:11:42.279 --> 00:11:46.440
<v Speaker 2>relativity works. I mean, GPS satellites use it. Previous gravitational

245
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>waves confirmed it true. What does a seventy six point

246
00:11:49.039 --> 00:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>nine SNR. Let us look at that we couldn't see

247
00:11:51.000 --> 00:11:51.519
<v Speaker 2>before it.

248
00:11:51.600 --> 00:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Lets us look at the deeply worked space time immediately

249
00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>before the merger and compare it with exquisite precision to

250
00:11:58.279 --> 00:12:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the warped space time after the black pot holes become

251
00:12:00.720 --> 00:12:04.399
<v Speaker 3>one single object, and by doing that they provided stunning

252
00:12:04.440 --> 00:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>confirmation of Stephen Hawking's black hole area theorem.

253
00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is where the physics gets incredibly trippy. Let's

254
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:15.799
<v Speaker 2>break down the area theorem because it completely defies human intuition.

255
00:12:16.080 --> 00:12:16.799
<v Speaker 3>It really does.

256
00:12:16.919 --> 00:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>When we talk about the area of a black hole,

257
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>we are talking about the event horizon right, the point

258
00:12:22.240 --> 00:12:23.480
<v Speaker 2>of no return right.

259
00:12:23.559 --> 00:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>And it is crucial to remember that the event horizon

260
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:28.679
<v Speaker 3>is not a solid physical.

261
00:12:28.240 --> 00:12:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Surface, right. It's not like the crust of the Earth.

262
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:32.759
<v Speaker 3>For the surface of an ocean exactly. It is a

263
00:12:32.759 --> 00:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>mathematical boundary in space where the escape velocity exceeds the

264
00:12:37.120 --> 00:12:41.519
<v Speaker 3>speed of light. Decades ago, Hawking theorized that in any

265
00:12:41.559 --> 00:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>physical process involving black holes, the total area of their

266
00:12:45.519 --> 00:12:47.200
<v Speaker 3>event horizons can never.

267
00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Decrease, never decrease. Right.

268
00:12:48.840 --> 00:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>If two black holes merge, the area of the new

269
00:12:52.159 --> 00:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>single event horizon must be strictly greater than the sum

270
00:12:55.759 --> 00:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of the areas of the two original black holes.

271
00:12:58.000 --> 00:13:00.639
<v Speaker 2>See. I know this sounds straightforward, but about a water

272
00:13:00.720 --> 00:13:04.200
<v Speaker 2>droplet analogy. If you take two separate water droplets on

273
00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>a windshield and they merge into one larger droplet, the

274
00:13:07.799 --> 00:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>total volume of water is conserved, but the total surface

275
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>area of that new single droplet is actually less than

276
00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:17.399
<v Speaker 2>the surface area the two separate droplets.

277
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Combined, because that is how three dimensional geometry usually works, exactly.

278
00:13:20.759 --> 00:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>But for a black hole, the rules are inverted. The

279
00:13:23.559 --> 00:13:26.639
<v Speaker 2>surface area must go up. And again, this isn't physical

280
00:13:26.679 --> 00:13:30.639
<v Speaker 2>matter expanding, It's a boundary of gravity. Right and GW

281
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>two five zero one one four proved observationally that this

282
00:13:34.519 --> 00:13:39.399
<v Speaker 2>invisible boundary physically grew exactly as Hawkings math demanded.

283
00:13:39.600 --> 00:13:42.879
<v Speaker 3>It is a profound confirmation, but the implications go much

284
00:13:42.919 --> 00:13:46.919
<v Speaker 3>deeper than geometry. Hawking's proposal wasn't just a quirk of relativity.

285
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:51.600
<v Speaker 3>It was the bridge to thermodynamics. Hawking, alongside Jacob Beekenstein,

286
00:13:52.000 --> 00:13:53.879
<v Speaker 3>realized that the area of a black hole is a

287
00:13:53.960 --> 00:13:56.600
<v Speaker 3>vent horizon is mathematically analogous to entropy.

288
00:13:56.879 --> 00:14:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, assuming everyone listening knows the second law of thermodynamics entropy,

289
00:14:01.279 --> 00:14:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the measure of disorder always increases in a closed system.

290
00:14:04.279 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>It's the arrow of time. It's why you can't unscramble

291
00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:09.519
<v Speaker 2>an egg, and why a hot cup of coffee inevitably

292
00:14:09.559 --> 00:14:12.759
<v Speaker 2>cools down. But applying the rules of a scrambled egg

293
00:14:12.799 --> 00:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to a tear in space time that just feels wrong.

294
00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:18.759
<v Speaker 3>It sounds absurd until you look at the math. The

295
00:14:18.799 --> 00:14:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Beckenstein Hawking formula explicitly links the entropy of a black

296
00:14:22.279 --> 00:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>hole to the surface area of its event horizon. The

297
00:14:25.480 --> 00:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>area is the entropy. So when these two massive black

298
00:14:28.960 --> 00:14:31.759
<v Speaker 3>holes in GW two five zero one to one team merged,

299
00:14:32.399 --> 00:14:36.600
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a clean silent fusion. The newly formed black

300
00:14:36.600 --> 00:14:39.759
<v Speaker 3>hole was violently distorted. It literally rings like a bell,

301
00:14:40.200 --> 00:14:42.799
<v Speaker 3>radiating away an enormous amount of energy in the form

302
00:14:42.840 --> 00:14:46.120
<v Speaker 3>of gravitational ways as it settles down into a perfect sphere.

303
00:14:46.200 --> 00:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, wait, wait, if it is radiating away massive amounts

304
00:14:49.240 --> 00:14:52.919
<v Speaker 2>of energy, shouldn't it be losing mass, Yes, and therefore shrinking.

305
00:14:53.000 --> 00:14:56.279
<v Speaker 2>And if it shrinks, wouldn't the area and the entropy decrease,

306
00:14:56.480 --> 00:14:59.759
<v Speaker 2>which violates the second law of thermodynamics.

307
00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>That is, the exact paradox. Physicists wrestled with, oh, really, yes,

308
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:07.279
<v Speaker 3>But analyzing the exceptionally clear waves from that ringing phase

309
00:15:07.399 --> 00:15:10.799
<v Speaker 3>the ring down confirmed that despite throwing off several sons

310
00:15:10.840 --> 00:15:13.799
<v Speaker 3>worth of energy during the merger, the geometry of a

311
00:15:13.840 --> 00:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>black hole is such that the total area still increases.

312
00:15:17.360 --> 00:15:20.759
<v Speaker 3>That is, wild, the mass lost to gravitational waves is

313
00:15:20.840 --> 00:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>more than offset by the way the remaining mass configures itself.

314
00:15:24.279 --> 00:15:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

315
00:15:25.080 --> 00:15:28.799
<v Speaker 3>This raises an important question, though, and proves definitively that

316
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:32.159
<v Speaker 3>the laws of thermodynamics, the exact same equations that govern

317
00:15:32.279 --> 00:15:34.720
<v Speaker 3>steam engines, heat flow, and the arrow of time on

318
00:15:34.799 --> 00:15:39.559
<v Speaker 3>Earth apply to invisible gravitational boundaries a billion light years away.

319
00:15:39.639 --> 00:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Here's where it gets really interesting, though. The mechanics of

320
00:15:42.279 --> 00:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a nineteenth century steam engine governing the event horizon of

321
00:15:45.759 --> 00:15:49.039
<v Speaker 2>a black hole it's poetic. It is, But if we

322
00:15:49.080 --> 00:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>are applying thermodynamics, I have to ask about temperature because

323
00:15:52.519 --> 00:15:55.759
<v Speaker 2>I know there is this severe counterintuitive quirk here regarding

324
00:15:55.759 --> 00:15:57.159
<v Speaker 2>how black holes handle heat.

325
00:15:57.320 --> 00:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Ah, you are referring to negative heat capacit.

326
00:16:00.679 --> 00:16:03.519
<v Speaker 2>Yes. If you're listening to this and wondering how on

327
00:16:03.519 --> 00:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Earth a massive black hole can be cold, you aren't alone.

328
00:16:07.480 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Because on Earth, if I pump energy into a system,

329
00:16:10.759 --> 00:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>like if I throw a log on a campfire, the

330
00:16:13.039 --> 00:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>fire gets hotter naturally, but a black hole does the

331
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>exact opposite.

332
00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>It completely upends our standard thermodynamic intuition. For a normal object,

333
00:16:22.440 --> 00:16:25.159
<v Speaker 3>temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of

334
00:16:25.159 --> 00:16:29.320
<v Speaker 3>its particles, right, But black holes emit thermal radiation Hawking

335
00:16:29.440 --> 00:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>radiation due to quantum effects near the event horizon, and

336
00:16:33.120 --> 00:16:36.039
<v Speaker 3>the mathematics dictate that the temperature of this radiation is

337
00:16:36.080 --> 00:16:38.519
<v Speaker 3>inversely proportional to the black hole's mass.

338
00:16:38.559 --> 00:16:41.519
<v Speaker 2>So as the black hole eats matter, gets heavier and

339
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>its event horizon grows, its temperature actually drops drastically.

340
00:16:45.679 --> 00:16:47.639
<v Speaker 3>A black hole with the mass of our Sun has

341
00:16:47.679 --> 00:16:50.240
<v Speaker 3>a temperature of about one ten millionth of a degree

342
00:16:50.279 --> 00:16:51.519
<v Speaker 3>above absolute zero.

343
00:16:51.720 --> 00:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>That is, incredibly cold.

344
00:16:53.159 --> 00:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>It is, but the newly birthed black hole from gw

345
00:16:56.159 --> 00:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>two five zero one one four, which was over sixty

346
00:16:59.399 --> 00:17:02.879
<v Speaker 3>times the mass of our Sun, it is exponentially colder.

347
00:17:03.559 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Super Massive black holes at the center of galaxies are

348
00:17:06.200 --> 00:17:09.119
<v Speaker 3>some of the coldest objects in the known universe. As

349
00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:11.720
<v Speaker 3>they gain energy and mass, they cool down.

350
00:17:11.920 --> 00:17:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I just love picturing this. You had this newly birthed

351
00:17:14.200 --> 00:17:18.559
<v Speaker 2>Leviathan born from an explosion of gravitational energy, ringing in

352
00:17:18.599 --> 00:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the absolute freezing dark of space, and it is fundamentally

353
00:17:22.240 --> 00:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>colder than the empty space around it.

354
00:17:23.720 --> 00:17:24.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a haunting image.

355
00:17:24.720 --> 00:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>And we only get to verify these incredibly exotic, almost

356
00:17:28.279 --> 00:17:32.519
<v Speaker 2>philosophical truths because a glass thread in Washington State didn't shake.

357
00:17:32.759 --> 00:17:35.559
<v Speaker 3>It is the ultimate triumph of fundamental physics. But you know,

358
00:17:35.599 --> 00:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>physics is only half the story of GWTC five right.

359
00:17:38.279 --> 00:17:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Allowed signal is a godsend for testing Einstein and Hawking.

360
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:43.279
<v Speaker 2>But if we want to understand the actual architecture of

361
00:17:43.279 --> 00:17:45.759
<v Speaker 2>the cosmos, we need to know exactly where these signals

362
00:17:45.799 --> 00:17:48.559
<v Speaker 2>are coming from exactly. A sound in the dark is fascinating,

363
00:17:48.599 --> 00:17:50.519
<v Speaker 2>but to map the room, you need to find the source.

364
00:17:50.839 --> 00:17:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's look at the next major milestone in the catalog

365
00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:55.480
<v Speaker 2>event GW two four zero.

366
00:17:55.319 --> 00:17:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Six one five, detected on June fifteenth, twenty twenty four.

367
00:17:58.839 --> 00:18:01.920
<v Speaker 3>The black holes here roughly twenty six and thirty times

368
00:18:02.000 --> 00:18:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the mass of the Sun, but the standout metric is

369
00:18:04.960 --> 00:18:06.799
<v Speaker 3>the distance and the localization.

370
00:18:07.160 --> 00:18:08.279
<v Speaker 2>How far away was it?

371
00:18:08.319 --> 00:18:11.799
<v Speaker 3>This collision happened more than three billion light years.

372
00:18:11.599 --> 00:18:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Away, three billion, which means the ripples we felt in

373
00:18:14.880 --> 00:18:17.559
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four started their journey when life on Earth

374
00:18:17.640 --> 00:18:20.720
<v Speaker 2>was barely figuring out multicellularity exactly.

375
00:18:21.599 --> 00:18:24.640
<v Speaker 3>But despite traveling for three billion years, this event holds

376
00:18:24.680 --> 00:18:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the record for the most accurate sky localization ever achieved

377
00:18:28.440 --> 00:18:30.000
<v Speaker 3>for a gravitational wave source.

378
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

379
00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:33.640
<v Speaker 3>The researchers managed to narrow its origin down to an

380
00:18:33.720 --> 00:18:36.480
<v Speaker 3>area covering only six square degrees on the sky.

381
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, anyone who follows astronomy knows that a full moon

382
00:18:39.319 --> 00:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>covers about half a degree of the sky, so six

383
00:18:42.279 --> 00:18:45.160
<v Speaker 2>square degrees is still a patch of sky holding twelve

384
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>full moons. To an optical astronomer with a telescope, that's

385
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:51.559
<v Speaker 2>a massive glory area, But in gravitational wave.

386
00:18:51.440 --> 00:18:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Astronomy it is practically a pinpoint. Historically, gravitational wave localizations

387
00:18:55.519 --> 00:18:59.519
<v Speaker 3>could span hundreds, sometimes thousands, of square degrees an entire

388
00:18:59.640 --> 00:19:00.960
<v Speaker 3>hemic sphere of the sky.

389
00:19:00.920 --> 00:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Basically just saying it came from up there.

390
00:19:02.960 --> 00:19:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, So narrowing it down to six square degrees is

391
00:19:06.200 --> 00:19:08.359
<v Speaker 3>a revolutionary leap in precision.

392
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:11.599
<v Speaker 2>How did we suddenly get that precise? Was it a

393
00:19:11.640 --> 00:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>hardware upgrade to the Ligo lasers or is this a

394
00:19:14.359 --> 00:19:15.119
<v Speaker 2>software trick?

395
00:19:15.640 --> 00:19:19.039
<v Speaker 3>It was primarily about geometry and the vital return of

396
00:19:19.079 --> 00:19:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the Virgo detector in Italy m Okay. Virgo had been

397
00:19:22.480 --> 00:19:25.559
<v Speaker 3>offline for upgrades during the previous run, but its return

398
00:19:25.720 --> 00:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>allowed the LVK collaboration to use all three major detectors simultaneously.

399
00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:33.599
<v Speaker 3>The two Ligo facilities in the US plus Virgo in

400
00:19:33.640 --> 00:19:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Europe form a massive intercontinental triangle.

401
00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So it's essentially a cosmic GPS system. Yes, if you

402
00:19:39.759 --> 00:19:42.559
<v Speaker 2>only have one cell tower pinging a phone, all you

403
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:44.759
<v Speaker 2>know is the phone is somewhere within a huge radius.

404
00:19:45.119 --> 00:19:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Two towers give you intersecting points, but three towers let

405
00:19:48.720 --> 00:19:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you drop a pin on the exact street corner.

406
00:19:50.839 --> 00:19:54.079
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Because gravitational waves travel at exactly the speed of light,

407
00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:56.279
<v Speaker 3>they wash over the earth and hit the different detectors

408
00:19:56.279 --> 00:19:57.440
<v Speaker 3>at slightly different.

409
00:19:57.119 --> 00:19:58.559
<v Speaker 2>Times, like fractions of a second.

410
00:19:58.880 --> 00:20:02.400
<v Speaker 3>We are talking about seconds of defense, the time it

411
00:20:02.440 --> 00:20:04.839
<v Speaker 3>takes light to travel through the crust of the Earth

412
00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>from Louisiana to Italy. By precisely measuring those tiny time delays,

413
00:20:10.319 --> 00:20:14.279
<v Speaker 3>scientists can calculate exactly where in the sky the wave originated.

414
00:20:14.400 --> 00:20:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Think about that. We are using collisions that happened three

415
00:20:17.880 --> 00:20:22.039
<v Speaker 2>billion years ago as cosmic yard sticks to measure how

416
00:20:22.079 --> 00:20:25.160
<v Speaker 2>fast the fabric of space is stretching today. Okay, I

417
00:20:25.240 --> 00:20:28.720
<v Speaker 2>understand the triangulation, but why is the astronomy community so

418
00:20:28.799 --> 00:20:31.920
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with the exact zip code of a black hole?

419
00:20:32.119 --> 00:20:32.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean?

420
00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, what is the broader scientific value of knowing which

421
00:20:35.720 --> 00:20:37.640
<v Speaker 2>specific galaxy this happened.

422
00:20:37.279 --> 00:20:40.079
<v Speaker 3>In ah Because it is the key to solving the

423
00:20:40.119 --> 00:20:43.559
<v Speaker 3>biggest crisis in modern cosmology, the Hubble tension.

424
00:20:43.240 --> 00:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>The expansion rate of the universe.

425
00:20:44.759 --> 00:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the universe is expanding, and the rate at which

426
00:20:47.039 --> 00:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>space is stretching is defined by the Hubble constant. But

427
00:20:49.839 --> 00:20:52.559
<v Speaker 3>we have a severe problem. It's the problem when we

428
00:20:52.599 --> 00:20:55.319
<v Speaker 3>measure the expansion rate by looking at the early universe,

429
00:20:55.519 --> 00:20:58.799
<v Speaker 3>meaning the leftover radiation from the Big Bang. The cosmic

430
00:20:58.839 --> 00:21:02.279
<v Speaker 3>microwave background, we get a value of about sixty seven

431
00:21:02.319 --> 00:21:05.039
<v Speaker 3>kilometers per second per megaparsek.

432
00:21:04.519 --> 00:21:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay sixty seven. But when we measure it locally in

433
00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>our present day universe using standard candles like CEPIAID, variable

434
00:21:12.440 --> 00:21:16.319
<v Speaker 2>stars and supernovas, we get a faster rate, right around

435
00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:19.119
<v Speaker 2>seventy three kilometers per second per megaparsec.

436
00:21:19.279 --> 00:21:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and both sets of measurements have been refined to

437
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:25.839
<v Speaker 3>the point where the error bars no longer overlap. Oh wow,

438
00:21:25.880 --> 00:21:29.119
<v Speaker 3>they are both highly precise, yet they disagree. It implies

439
00:21:29.160 --> 00:21:32.759
<v Speaker 3>there is something fundamentally broken or missing in our standard

440
00:21:32.759 --> 00:21:34.599
<v Speaker 3>model of cosmology.

441
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Which is terrifying for physicists.

442
00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:40.160
<v Speaker 3>It is so gravitational waves offer a completely independent third

443
00:21:40.200 --> 00:21:43.240
<v Speaker 3>way to measure the expansion. They act as standard sirens.

444
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Standard sirens because on like light, gravity doesn't get blocked, scattered,

445
00:21:48.119 --> 00:21:49.680
<v Speaker 2>or dimmed by interstellar dust.

446
00:21:49.920 --> 00:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Exactly with light, determining true distance is notoriously difficult. A

447
00:21:54.720 --> 00:21:56.759
<v Speaker 3>star might look dim because it's far away, or it

448
00:21:56.799 --> 00:21:58.799
<v Speaker 3>might look dim because there's a cloud of dust in

449
00:21:58.839 --> 00:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>the way.

450
00:21:59.200 --> 00:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's ambiguity.

451
00:22:00.400 --> 00:22:03.400
<v Speaker 3>But with a gravitational wave, general relativity allows us to

452
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:07.640
<v Speaker 3>calculate the absolute luminosity distance directly from the amplitude and

453
00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:11.319
<v Speaker 3>the frequency evolution of the wave itself. Yes, the math

454
00:22:11.359 --> 00:22:14.160
<v Speaker 3>gives us the distance purely from the strain on the detector,

455
00:22:14.640 --> 00:22:16.920
<v Speaker 3>no intermediate stepping stones required.

456
00:22:17.319 --> 00:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But to get the expansion rate distance is only half

457
00:22:20.920 --> 00:22:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the equation. I also need to know how fast that

458
00:22:23.480 --> 00:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>object is receding away from us due to the stretching

459
00:22:26.519 --> 00:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of space.

460
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, you need the red shift, and gravitational waves alone

461
00:22:30.480 --> 00:22:32.960
<v Speaker 3>cannot give you the red shift. To get that, you

462
00:22:33.039 --> 00:22:35.799
<v Speaker 3>have to find the specific host galaxy where the merger

463
00:22:35.839 --> 00:22:39.279
<v Speaker 3>occurred and analyze the light from that galaxy. If your

464
00:22:39.319 --> 00:22:43.079
<v Speaker 3>gravitational wave localization is a huge blurry smudge covering ten

465
00:22:43.119 --> 00:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>thousand galaxies, you have no idea which galaxies light to measure.

466
00:22:46.759 --> 00:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Ah So by pinning GW two four zero six one

467
00:22:50.359 --> 00:22:53.319
<v Speaker 2>five down to just six square degrees, it becomes dramatically

468
00:22:53.359 --> 00:22:56.599
<v Speaker 2>easier for optical telescopes to sweep that small patch, identify

469
00:22:56.599 --> 00:22:58.839
<v Speaker 2>the host galaxy, and get the red shift precisely.

470
00:22:59.039 --> 00:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And this new catalog didn't just rely on this one

471
00:23:01.240 --> 00:23:04.519
<v Speaker 3>incredible event. Alex Papadoppolos, a researcher at the Institute for

472
00:23:04.519 --> 00:23:08.599
<v Speaker 3>Gravitational research noted that GWTC five utilized two hundred thirty

473
00:23:08.599 --> 00:23:11.119
<v Speaker 3>six signals for this Hubble constant analysis.

474
00:23:11.119 --> 00:23:13.519
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred and thirty six. That is almost double the

475
00:23:13.599 --> 00:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>number of signals used in previous catalogs and in statistics

476
00:23:17.200 --> 00:23:18.799
<v Speaker 2>sample sizes everything.

477
00:23:18.680 --> 00:23:22.799
<v Speaker 3>It really is, each individual black hole merger contributes a

478
00:23:22.839 --> 00:23:26.599
<v Speaker 3>small probability distribution a piece of the puzzle regarding the

479
00:23:26.640 --> 00:23:30.480
<v Speaker 3>expansion rate. By mathematically combining two hundred and thirty six

480
00:23:30.519 --> 00:23:33.799
<v Speaker 3>of them, the aerror bars shrink dramatically, I can imagine.

481
00:23:33.839 --> 00:23:36.440
<v Speaker 3>But processing that volume of data isn't something you can

482
00:23:36.480 --> 00:23:38.400
<v Speaker 3>just run on a standard desktop.

483
00:23:38.119 --> 00:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Which brings us to the software, because you have two

484
00:23:40.799 --> 00:23:46.119
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty six immensely complex multidimensional waveforms and you

485
00:23:46.160 --> 00:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>have to cross reference them with massive optical galaxy catalogs. Yeah,

486
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>what was the bottleneck before and how did they fix

487
00:23:52.400 --> 00:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>it for this release?

488
00:23:53.880 --> 00:23:57.400
<v Speaker 3>The computational bottleneck lies in Bayesian inference. To map the

489
00:23:57.400 --> 00:24:00.920
<v Speaker 3>parameters of a gravitational wave, you know, mass bin distant

490
00:24:01.039 --> 00:24:05.680
<v Speaker 3>sky location supercomputers run Markov Chain Monty Carlo algorithms. Okay,

491
00:24:05.839 --> 00:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>they generate millions of simulated waveforms and compare them to

492
00:24:08.920 --> 00:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the actual noisy data to find the best fit. Historically,

493
00:24:12.000 --> 00:24:15.160
<v Speaker 3>this took weeks or even months of continuing supercomputer time

494
00:24:15.240 --> 00:24:16.319
<v Speaker 3>for a single.

495
00:24:16.119 --> 00:24:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Event, just to process one event.

496
00:24:18.039 --> 00:24:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but the Glasgow researchers developed and tested entirely new

497
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:27.279
<v Speaker 3>software architecture for this catalog. They optimize the likelihood evaluations

498
00:24:27.319 --> 00:24:30.400
<v Speaker 3>so aggressively that the analysis runs more than a thousand

499
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:31.160
<v Speaker 3>times faster.

500
00:24:31.440 --> 00:24:34.079
<v Speaker 2>A thousand times faster. That isn't just an upgrade. That

501
00:24:34.160 --> 00:24:36.519
<v Speaker 2>is a paradigm shift in data science. Yeah, you go

502
00:24:36.599 --> 00:24:39.119
<v Speaker 2>from waiting a month for an answer to getting it

503
00:24:39.160 --> 00:24:39.799
<v Speaker 2>while you're at.

504
00:24:39.759 --> 00:24:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Lunch, And that speed isn't just about impatience. When you

505
00:24:42.759 --> 00:24:46.240
<v Speaker 3>can run a highly complex statistical model in minutes, you

506
00:24:46.240 --> 00:24:49.640
<v Speaker 3>can vigorously test the robustness of your results. Right. You

507
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:53.640
<v Speaker 3>can inject artificial errors, tweak the cosmological priors, and run

508
00:24:53.799 --> 00:24:57.000
<v Speaker 3>thousands of different scenarios to ensure that the final number

509
00:24:57.039 --> 00:24:59.880
<v Speaker 3>you publish for the Hubble constant is bulletproof.

510
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:03.079
<v Speaker 2>It is computationally iterating on the architecture of the cosmos.

511
00:25:03.240 --> 00:25:06.480
<v Speaker 2>So we've used the loudest signals to test thermodynamics. We've

512
00:25:06.559 --> 00:25:09.640
<v Speaker 2>used the precisely located signals to map the expansion of space.

513
00:25:10.480 --> 00:25:14.640
<v Speaker 2>But yesterday's catalog revealed something else, something about the actual

514
00:25:14.720 --> 00:25:19.319
<v Speaker 2>identity of these black holes that completely rewrites stellar biology.

515
00:25:19.759 --> 00:25:20.559
<v Speaker 2>You can call it that.

516
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:23.240
<v Speaker 3>We are talking about the family trees of the cosmos,

517
00:25:23.519 --> 00:25:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the discovery of hierarchical mergers.

518
00:25:25.920 --> 00:25:28.519
<v Speaker 2>For the longest time, the narrative was simple. A massive

519
00:25:28.559 --> 00:25:31.680
<v Speaker 2>star runs out of a nuclear fuel, the core collapses

520
00:25:31.720 --> 00:25:34.599
<v Speaker 2>under its own immense gravity, and you get a black hole.

521
00:25:34.839 --> 00:25:37.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the final end point of a star's life. But

522
00:25:37.680 --> 00:25:40.880
<v Speaker 2>events GW two four one is zero eleven and GW

523
00:25:40.960 --> 00:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>two four one one ten are screaming that this isn't

524
00:25:44.440 --> 00:25:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole story.

525
00:25:45.079 --> 00:25:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Now it's not. These two highly unusual mergers were detected

526
00:25:48.400 --> 00:25:51.440
<v Speaker 3>a month apart in late twenty twenty four. One was

527
00:25:51.480 --> 00:25:54.799
<v Speaker 3>about seven hundred million light years away, the other much

528
00:25:54.880 --> 00:25:58.039
<v Speaker 3>further at two point four billion light years, And what

529
00:25:58.160 --> 00:26:01.200
<v Speaker 3>flagged them immediately in the analysis wasn't their distance, but

530
00:26:01.279 --> 00:26:05.279
<v Speaker 3>their intrinsic properties, which properties their masses and their spins.

531
00:26:05.799 --> 00:26:08.559
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive deep into the spin mechanics. Yeah, because when

532
00:26:08.599 --> 00:26:12.039
<v Speaker 2>a star collapses, conservation of angular momentum dictates that the

533
00:26:12.079 --> 00:26:14.759
<v Speaker 2>resulting black hole should spin right like an ice skater.

534
00:26:14.880 --> 00:26:15.519
<v Speaker 2>Pulling their arms.

535
00:26:15.559 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 3>In Yes, the CERR parameter, which measures a black hole spin.

536
00:26:18.759 --> 00:26:22.400
<v Speaker 3>It's crucial here. However, when we observe typical first generation

537
00:26:22.559 --> 00:26:25.480
<v Speaker 3>black holes, meaning those born directly from collapsing stars in

538
00:26:25.519 --> 00:26:29.640
<v Speaker 3>a binary pair, their spins tend to be relatively low. Furthermore,

539
00:26:30.160 --> 00:26:33.119
<v Speaker 3>because those two stars likely formed together from the same

540
00:26:33.319 --> 00:26:38.079
<v Speaker 3>swirling cloud of gas, their rotational axes are usually aligned

541
00:26:38.119 --> 00:26:40.920
<v Speaker 3>with their mutual orbit. They spin in the same direction

542
00:26:41.039 --> 00:26:41.519
<v Speaker 3>they orbit.

543
00:26:41.759 --> 00:26:45.440
<v Speaker 2>But these two new events in GWTC five broke those

544
00:26:45.519 --> 00:26:46.960
<v Speaker 2>rules completely completely.

545
00:26:47.400 --> 00:26:52.039
<v Speaker 3>They featured highly unequal masses, meaning one black hole was

546
00:26:52.119 --> 00:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>significantly bulkier than its partner.

547
00:26:54.240 --> 00:26:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

548
00:26:54.839 --> 00:26:59.319
<v Speaker 3>But the smoking gun was the spin. They exhibited distinct,

549
00:26:59.640 --> 00:27:04.319
<v Speaker 3>high magnitude spins that were drastically misaligned from their orbital axis.

550
00:27:04.599 --> 00:27:07.200
<v Speaker 2>If they didn't form together from a collapsing star system,

551
00:27:07.640 --> 00:27:11.680
<v Speaker 2>how do you get a lopsided pairing with wild misaligned spins.

552
00:27:11.759 --> 00:27:13.680
<v Speaker 3>You get it because you are looking at a second

553
00:27:13.720 --> 00:27:14.680
<v Speaker 3>generation black hole.

554
00:27:14.720 --> 00:27:16.599
<v Speaker 2>The second generation, the larger black.

555
00:27:16.400 --> 00:27:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Hole in these systems, wasn't born from a star. It

556
00:27:18.880 --> 00:27:21.119
<v Speaker 3>was born from a previous black hole merger.

557
00:27:21.200 --> 00:27:22.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a Frankenstein's monster.

558
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:26.400
<v Speaker 3>It is the product of cosmic recycling. When two first

559
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:30.279
<v Speaker 3>generation black holes merge, the resulting single black hole absorbs

560
00:27:30.319 --> 00:27:33.559
<v Speaker 3>a massive amount of angular momentum from the orbital energy

561
00:27:33.640 --> 00:27:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of the collision itself. It gets spun up exactly, it

562
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:40.279
<v Speaker 3>gets spin kick. The resulting second generation black hole spins

563
00:27:40.400 --> 00:27:44.559
<v Speaker 3>incredibly fast, often reaching a Cerr parameter of point seven

564
00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:47.400
<v Speaker 3>or point eight, which is near the theoretical maximum. That's

565
00:27:47.440 --> 00:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>insanely fast, and crucially, the direction of that new spin

566
00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:53.880
<v Speaker 3>is dictated entirely by the chaotic geometry of the collision,

567
00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:57.400
<v Speaker 3>meaning it will be randomly oriented relative to any future

568
00:27:57.440 --> 00:27:58.359
<v Speaker 3>partner it finds.

569
00:27:58.799 --> 00:28:01.680
<v Speaker 2>So what is this all mean? I picture this like

570
00:28:01.720 --> 00:28:06.039
<v Speaker 2>a heavyweight demolition derby. It's not just a peaceful binary

571
00:28:06.079 --> 00:28:09.279
<v Speaker 2>star system quietly living out its days and collapsing. It

572
00:28:09.359 --> 00:28:12.680
<v Speaker 2>is the winner of a previous collision, finding another black hole,

573
00:28:13.000 --> 00:28:15.480
<v Speaker 2>capturing it, and colliding again. We are looking at the

574
00:28:15.480 --> 00:28:18.319
<v Speaker 2>heavyweight champions of the universe. That's a great analogy, but

575
00:28:18.400 --> 00:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that requires a highly specific environment, doesn't it. Space is

576
00:28:21.759 --> 00:28:25.519
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly empty. If two black holes merge in the quiet

577
00:28:25.559 --> 00:28:29.319
<v Speaker 2>spiral arms of our galaxy, the resulting second generation black

578
00:28:29.359 --> 00:28:31.079
<v Speaker 2>hole is just going to sit there alone in the

579
00:28:31.160 --> 00:28:32.160
<v Speaker 2>dark forever.

580
00:28:31.960 --> 00:28:33.960
<v Speaker 3>It has no one else to interact with. To get

581
00:28:34.039 --> 00:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>hierarchical mergers, you need a dense, highly populated environment. You

582
00:28:38.279 --> 00:28:40.079
<v Speaker 3>need a cosmic factory floor.

583
00:28:40.200 --> 00:28:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Where are these factory floors?

584
00:28:42.039 --> 00:28:46.839
<v Speaker 3>We believe these environments are globular clusters, ancient tightly packed

585
00:28:46.839 --> 00:28:51.119
<v Speaker 3>spheres containing millions of stars orbiting the outskirts of galaxies, and.

586
00:28:51.119 --> 00:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>The dynamics inside these clusters are wild. Because black holes

587
00:28:54.640 --> 00:28:57.799
<v Speaker 2>are heavier than the average star. Over millions of years,

588
00:28:58.319 --> 00:29:01.839
<v Speaker 2>they experienced dynamical frime. They essentially sink to the very

589
00:29:01.880 --> 00:29:04.000
<v Speaker 2>center of the cluster mass segregation.

590
00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:07.000
<v Speaker 3>You end up with a dark core, a swarm of

591
00:29:07.079 --> 00:29:10.079
<v Speaker 3>black holes furiously buzzing around each other in a highly

592
00:29:10.119 --> 00:29:14.720
<v Speaker 3>confined space. And in this chaotic swarm, three body interactions

593
00:29:14.759 --> 00:29:15.480
<v Speaker 3>become common.

594
00:29:15.680 --> 00:29:17.559
<v Speaker 2>Break down a three body interaction.

595
00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:20.759
<v Speaker 3>For us, imagine two black holes orbiting each other. A

596
00:29:20.799 --> 00:29:24.440
<v Speaker 3>third black hole flies close by. The gravitational interaction is

597
00:29:24.480 --> 00:29:25.759
<v Speaker 3>incredibly chaotic, like.

598
00:29:25.720 --> 00:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>A gravitational mosh pit.

599
00:29:27.279 --> 00:29:30.559
<v Speaker 3>Pretty much what usually happens is the lightest of the

600
00:29:30.599 --> 00:29:34.119
<v Speaker 3>three black holes gets gravitationally slingshoted out of the system

601
00:29:34.119 --> 00:29:37.519
<v Speaker 3>at high speed, but to conserve energy, the remaining two

602
00:29:37.519 --> 00:29:41.440
<v Speaker 3>black holes are forced into a much tighter, closer orbit.

603
00:29:41.319 --> 00:29:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Which dramatically accelerates their eventual collision.

604
00:29:44.119 --> 00:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they merge, creating a massive, highly spinning second generation

605
00:29:49.359 --> 00:29:52.240
<v Speaker 3>black hole, and because it is sitting in the middle

606
00:29:52.240 --> 00:29:55.319
<v Speaker 3>of this dense swarm, it doesn't take long for it

607
00:29:55.359 --> 00:29:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to gravitationally capture a new partner and start the process

608
00:29:58.440 --> 00:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>all over again.

609
00:29:59.400 --> 00:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>This change the entire paradigm of stellar revolution, and what

610
00:30:02.720 --> 00:30:05.359
<v Speaker 2>blows my mind is that this isn't just a fringe

611
00:30:05.400 --> 00:30:09.359
<v Speaker 2>theory based on two weird outliers anymore. The catalog proves

612
00:30:09.440 --> 00:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>this is happening at scale.

613
00:30:10.720 --> 00:30:13.279
<v Speaker 3>If we connect this to the bigger picture Storm Columns

614
00:30:13.319 --> 00:30:17.839
<v Speaker 3>a postgraduate researcher focus specifically on this. They analyze two

615
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:20.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty seven sources from the catalog, including over

616
00:30:20.920 --> 00:30:24.839
<v Speaker 3>one hundred brand new observations, to measure the masses, spins,

617
00:30:24.880 --> 00:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and distances. This is where the field matures into deep demographics.

618
00:30:29.039 --> 00:30:31.319
<v Speaker 2>We aren't just finding a few interesting houses, We are

619
00:30:31.400 --> 00:30:33.480
<v Speaker 2>running a census on the entire hidden.

620
00:30:33.200 --> 00:30:36.640
<v Speaker 3>City, and the census data shows a clear correlation. Black

621
00:30:36.680 --> 00:30:40.640
<v Speaker 3>holes in different mass ranges consistently exhibit different spin characteristics.

622
00:30:41.039 --> 00:30:45.039
<v Speaker 3>The signatures of hierarchical mergers persist across the population. It

623
00:30:45.119 --> 00:30:49.519
<v Speaker 3>proves definitively that the universe has multiple formation pathways. It

624
00:30:49.599 --> 00:30:53.480
<v Speaker 3>is actively running assembly lines in these dense stellar clusters,

625
00:30:53.519 --> 00:30:57.279
<v Speaker 3>forging increasingly massive black holes from the remnants of smaller ones.

626
00:30:57.519 --> 00:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>It is breathtaking to step back and look at the

627
00:30:59.680 --> 00:31:02.559
<v Speaker 2>tragactory we are on. In less than ten years, we

628
00:31:02.599 --> 00:31:06.039
<v Speaker 2>have gone from hey, we finally build a glass pendulum

629
00:31:06.160 --> 00:31:10.599
<v Speaker 2>quiet enough to prove these invisible ripples exist to Here

630
00:31:10.799 --> 00:31:15.519
<v Speaker 2>is a highly optimized Bayesian mapped demographic breakdown of multi

631
00:31:15.559 --> 00:31:19.799
<v Speaker 2>generational black hole factories across billions of light years, complete

632
00:31:19.799 --> 00:31:22.599
<v Speaker 2>with thermodynamic stress tests of their event horizon.

633
00:31:22.680 --> 00:31:25.359
<v Speaker 3>It's moving so fast, and the statistical power is only

634
00:31:25.359 --> 00:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>going to grow. As the observatories upgrade for their next runs,

635
00:31:28.519 --> 00:31:31.559
<v Speaker 3>we will transition from hundreds of events to thousands.

636
00:31:31.119 --> 00:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Which brings a quote to mind from doctor Daniel Williams,

637
00:31:33.480 --> 00:31:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the co chair of the ls's Compact Binary Science Working Group.

638
00:31:37.079 --> 00:31:39.799
<v Speaker 2>He said that looking at this massive catalog is the

639
00:31:39.839 --> 00:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>astronomical equivalent of uncovering an ancient civilization.

640
00:31:43.160 --> 00:31:43.680
<v Speaker 3>It really is.

641
00:31:43.920 --> 00:31:47.319
<v Speaker 2>We aren't just logging individual deaths of stars. We are

642
00:31:47.359 --> 00:31:51.720
<v Speaker 2>revealing the underlying infrastructure of a lost world. We are

643
00:31:51.799 --> 00:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing how these dark leviathans congregate, how they grow, and

644
00:31:55.960 --> 00:31:59.480
<v Speaker 2>how their violent interactions shape the very galaxies they inhabit.

645
00:31:59.599 --> 00:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>It is a found realization. We are mapping the dark

646
00:32:02.279 --> 00:32:03.519
<v Speaker 3>skeleton of the universe.

647
00:32:03.759 --> 00:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So the next time you step outside on a quiet

648
00:32:06.039 --> 00:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>night and look up at the dark sky, I want

649
00:32:08.440 --> 00:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>you to remember that it is not still, It is

650
00:32:11.559 --> 00:32:15.160
<v Speaker 2>not silent. The empty space between the stars is actively

651
00:32:15.240 --> 00:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>ringing with the echoes of invisible giants colliding. We are

652
00:32:18.759 --> 00:32:21.279
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the shore of a cosmic ocean, and finally

653
00:32:21.319 --> 00:32:22.559
<v Speaker 2>we can hear the waves crashing.

654
00:32:22.880 --> 00:32:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Beautifully said, but before we wrap up.

655
00:32:24.799 --> 00:32:27.079
<v Speaker 2>I want to leave you with one final thought, something

656
00:32:27.119 --> 00:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to chew want. Based on these dense globular clusters and

657
00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:33.240
<v Speaker 2>second generation black holes, we know these environments act as

658
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:37.359
<v Speaker 2>factory floors, forcing black holes to merge, creating heavier, faster

659
00:32:37.480 --> 00:32:38.799
<v Speaker 2>spinning offspring.

660
00:32:38.400 --> 00:32:39.880
<v Speaker 3>The cosmic billiard table.

661
00:32:40.079 --> 00:32:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, But if that environment is so crowded and the

662
00:32:42.960 --> 00:32:47.279
<v Speaker 2>three body interactions keep tightening orbits, could this process theoretically

663
00:32:47.279 --> 00:32:50.759
<v Speaker 2>continue without end If a second generation black hole eats

664
00:32:50.799 --> 00:32:53.559
<v Speaker 2>another black hole because a third generation and that a

665
00:32:53.599 --> 00:32:57.839
<v Speaker 2>fourth is there a physical limit to how massive a

666
00:32:57.880 --> 00:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>black hole can grow purely through this bumpercar style of

667
00:33:01.200 --> 00:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>cosmic evolution before they alter the very galaxies they live in.

668
00:33:05.319 --> 00:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>That is the bleeding edge of the science right now.

669
00:33:07.839 --> 00:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>The limiting factor is the gravitational recoil recoil. When two

670
00:33:12.279 --> 00:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>black holes merge, the resultant gravitational waves aren't emitted perfectly symmetrically.

671
00:33:17.319 --> 00:33:20.319
<v Speaker 3>This gives the new black hole a massive kick, sending

672
00:33:20.319 --> 00:33:21.960
<v Speaker 3>it hurtling through space like.

673
00:33:21.880 --> 00:33:23.480
<v Speaker 2>A rocket effect made of pure gravity.

674
00:33:23.720 --> 00:33:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and sometimes that kick is so violent that the

675
00:33:26.759 --> 00:33:30.519
<v Speaker 3>recoil velocity exceeds the escape velocity of the globular cluster.

676
00:33:31.039 --> 00:33:33.079
<v Speaker 3>The new black hole is literally shot out of the

677
00:33:33.079 --> 00:33:36.799
<v Speaker 3>cluster into the empty intergalactic void, terminating its growth forever.

678
00:33:37.200 --> 00:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>But what if it's already so massive that the kick

679
00:33:40.759 --> 00:33:44.319
<v Speaker 2>isn't enough to eject it. What if it survives the recoil,

680
00:33:44.680 --> 00:33:46.519
<v Speaker 2>sings back to the center of the dark core, and

681
00:33:46.599 --> 00:33:50.640
<v Speaker 2>eats again. We could be on the verge of discovering third, fourth,

682
00:33:50.720 --> 00:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>or fifth generation black holes. We could literally be watching

683
00:33:53.960 --> 00:33:57.559
<v Speaker 2>the mechanical process that eventually builds the super massive black

684
00:33:57.599 --> 00:34:00.519
<v Speaker 2>holes sitting in the centers of galaxies. And we will

685
00:34:00.519 --> 00:34:02.359
<v Speaker 2>only know because we figured out how to measure a

686
00:34:02.400 --> 00:34:06.039
<v Speaker 2>shift smaller than a fraction of an atomic nucleus. The

687
00:34:06.119 --> 00:34:08.360
<v Speaker 2>universe has incredically loud, my friends. You just have to

688
00:34:08.360 --> 00:34:09.079
<v Speaker 2>know how to listen.
