Speaker 1: Okay, we're live. Hi, this is William Ramsey. Welcome to
Speaker 1: William Ramsey Investigates on today's show. I have a very
Speaker 1: special guest. His name is Andrew of the six G podcast.
Speaker 1: I will put a link to his podcast in the
Speaker 1: show notes and this will be a part two to
Speaker 1: the show. Did the part one was last Friday, so
Speaker 1: it was just over six days ago. That one was
Speaker 1: the from Siap what I titled it is from Siap
Speaker 1: to Mind where the psychology of Victory Revisited, which was
Speaker 1: written by Paul Valelli and the notorious Michael Akino. I've
Speaker 1: done shows on and written about and children, I don't
Speaker 1: know Children of the Beast, but definitely Global Death Cult
Speaker 1: because he was in contact with guys that started to
Speaker 1: own nine A. But this is you know, we've done
Speaker 1: other shows. We've talked about the Dark Enlightenment, Fort Bragg,
Speaker 1: global elite satanic peta rings and just what the sixth
Speaker 1: G is, which the agenda is going on, and that
Speaker 1: persistence of agenda is a very scary thing. The persistence
Speaker 1: of the agenda attached to this mind war, this idea
Speaker 1: of like going from just siop to just general mind
Speaker 1: war against populations and you'd like to think it would
Speaker 1: just be foreign populations, but I think that that's that's naive.
Speaker 1: I think that the American people are under full on
Speaker 1: mind war and probably have been on full on mind
Speaker 1: war for decades in this kind of evil and in
Speaker 1: my opinion, evil Empire were in like some kind of
Speaker 1: post republic phase. So it's very important to study this,
Speaker 1: study what these guys are thinking, Study what these psyop
Speaker 1: experts are thinking, because they do turn it on us.
Speaker 1: And we've I've done shows that are just titled siab
Speaker 1: after syb after sip because that's what's happening. And you
Speaker 1: see that here, Like I've looked through this whole so
Speaker 1: called Moon thing. It's like, whoa, this is a lot
Speaker 1: of the stuff is fake, man. There's just a lot
Speaker 1: of fake, fake, and uh things that are distractions. This
Speaker 1: whole thing about this woman being abducted Guthrie, which I
Speaker 1: guess is an important story, but there's so many other
Speaker 1: important things happening, like the potential for thermonuclear war in
Speaker 1: the Middle East that like you got to wonder what's
Speaker 1: going on anyway, Andrew can talk more about that. There's
Speaker 1: three books by A. Kino that we're going to reference.
Speaker 1: So Andrew, welcome back to the show.
Speaker 2: Hey, thank you for having me, and yeah, excited to
Speaker 2: get into this. Yeah, definitely mind Wars we're in it.
Speaker 2: And yeah, this book I highly recommend everybody you know
Speaker 2: get it.
Speaker 3: It's definitely worth reading mind Wars.
Speaker 2: It's very it just lays out the whole blueprint, you know,
Speaker 2: and yeah, yeah, so we're gonna lay out some of
Speaker 2: it now, but yeah, I just think it's super pertinent
Speaker 2: for everybody to understand because you know what's funny. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, this guy's like say, you know, it comes
Speaker 2: from the Satanic Church and you know, all this stuff,
Speaker 2: but he lays out ethical ways to do mind Wars,
Speaker 2: and it's so funny because I've seen direct breaking of
Speaker 2: these rules with some of the psyops that we're seeing.
Speaker 2: So it's funny that the controller they're not even following
Speaker 2: the blueprint per se, you know, of the ethical standpoints
Speaker 2: that he lays out. So it's very funny to watch
Speaker 2: where it's like, yeah, they're not even doing it right necessarily.
Speaker 1: So do you think they're just totally unethical? Like he's
Speaker 1: just like detached from as that we're saying.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so whenever you read, and we'll get into it.
Speaker 2: But yeah, there's parts in here where he kind of
Speaker 2: explains like ways to do this where it's you know,
Speaker 2: proper and you're not you know, and they we'll get
Speaker 2: into examples, but like fine Far is a great one
Speaker 2: where he kind of lays out all the different ways
Speaker 2: that that you can manipulate people, but doing it in
Speaker 2: a way where see okay for instance, but want to
Speaker 2: see a certain outcome, so you have to deliver that outcome.
Speaker 2: If you don't deliver the outcome like you're supposed to,
Speaker 2: then people aren't going to really fall for it is easily.
Speaker 2: So you have people like us who see through some
Speaker 2: of these syops because they're not doing them right. That's
Speaker 2: kind of the whole thing people are saying nowadays, Oh
Speaker 2: I miss the days when people did better syops, And
Speaker 2: that's kind of what we're pointing at.
Speaker 1: Right, And this one was a follow on to that
Speaker 1: ten page paper, right, So he had written that and
Speaker 1: then this was what kind of followed on to that.
Speaker 1: That's my understanding. It's interesting you mentioned to Arthur C. Clark,
Speaker 1: who is another notorious figure in the twentieth century.
Speaker 2: But twenty thirteen this came out Mind War. He wrote
Speaker 2: the actual first paper what was that nineteen eighty Paul
Speaker 2: Vallelli asked him to do that, I think, so very
Speaker 2: long in the making. So by the time this was
Speaker 2: fleshed out into a book, it was fully fully done.
Speaker 2: Mind Star came out twenty sixteen, and then this book
Speaker 2: Fine Far Here I think was just a few years
Speaker 2: following that.
Speaker 3: And then he died.
Speaker 1: And then he died like it's seventy two, I think
Speaker 1: in San Francisco, after an infamous life. So what do
Speaker 1: you do? Where do you want to start? Like what?
Speaker 1: Like there's a lot in this It's like.
Speaker 2: Well, this is my favorite quote in the very beginning.
Speaker 2: Mine War would have never been completed, in its mysterious
Speaker 2: and intricate journey from vision to book without regular sprinklings
Speaker 2: of greenish gray pixie dust from my soulmate and muse Lilith.
Speaker 2: I thought that was a funny quote that he put
Speaker 2: in there, the pixie dust aspect, knowing that she's kind
Speaker 2: of into witchcraft, and you know whatnot so there's clearly
Speaker 2: that witchcraft aspect to applying this in a militaristic way.
Speaker 1: Right, And there's a picture of him with her like
Speaker 1: it's pre ai. He's with Lilith. His kind of like, oh,
Speaker 1: they were on Hurraldo together actually, so you can see
Speaker 1: maybe I can find that video.
Speaker 3: She looks she looks like Lilith, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: She looks. He looks scary too. I just saw a
Speaker 1: picture of him today. Even as a young kid, he
Speaker 1: he kind of had that view of like, I'm not
Speaker 1: surprised I became a Satanist.
Speaker 2: Have you seen the side by sides of JD. Vance
Speaker 2: and Michael Lakino? And then people take half of Erica
Speaker 2: Kirk's face and half y Vance's face and they're like
Speaker 2: the same, and so they're like all three the same.
Speaker 3: And people have kind.
Speaker 2: Of pointed to that, Not that I really believe it,
Speaker 2: but I just think that's interesting.
Speaker 1: Kirk is a strange character, you know, it is weird.
Speaker 1: She's like part of this kind of you know, what
Speaker 1: do you call it, military industrial complex background.
Speaker 2: It's really crazy, I think, you know, given this topic
Speaker 2: and given the you know, state of affairs that we're seeing,
Speaker 2: especially with syops coming from those people, it's so interesting
Speaker 2: that that little comparison can be made, you know, as
Speaker 2: far as just just how they look, and I mean jd.
Speaker 2: Vance changed his name like three times, came from a
Speaker 2: pilladict mother, you know, and all this this whole backstory, right,
Speaker 2: so who knows? And then Erica Kirk decides not to
Speaker 2: go to the TPUSA event recently there's like one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty people that end up going there, one hundred
Speaker 2: and eighty people viewing it on YouTube, so they had
Speaker 2: like nothing. And the vice president goes there, but Erica
Speaker 2: Kirk doesn't. That kind of shows that she kind of
Speaker 2: supersedes him even it almost seems like she's really the
Speaker 2: deep state, you know, that she supersedes.
Speaker 3: Him behind doors, I think behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: It's so strange. These people are so strange. How does
Speaker 1: he get into Yale? You know, it's like the Yale
Speaker 1: lass was very covered. These are odd people, Like, there's
Speaker 1: no question about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, But yeah, that's just the interesting current event thing.
Speaker 3: I thought tight in cool. But yeah, so I've got
Speaker 3: a lot of notes here.
Speaker 2: But we could pull up the book too if you want,
Speaker 2: because I've got page numbers.
Speaker 3: Ok, I got it right, look at Yeah, I figured.
Speaker 1: He was yeah strange. It's got the kind of like
Speaker 1: overlapping triangle theme. To you know, oh yeah, the six
Speaker 1: the hexagram theme or whatever you want call.
Speaker 2: So I say that that's like a rendition in the
Speaker 2: Star of David in a weird way, or the rem
Speaker 2: fant you know, at a six point. So he talks
Speaker 2: about how mind war is the purpose of his disease,
Speaker 2: all control of the means of government and how people
Speaker 2: process information that way, you know, what they use to
Speaker 2: make up their minds and adjustice that their minds are
Speaker 2: made up in your favor. So, you know, I've been
Speaker 2: getting too stuff called exposure Gate, where the deep state
Speaker 2: is exposing itself in order to kind of use that
Speaker 2: corruption to generate an outcome that they want, like AI governance,
Speaker 2: right for instance. And so that's an example of this
Speaker 2: where they're seizing all the means of you know, information,
Speaker 2: they're exposing all these you know, conspiracy theories. You're seeing
Speaker 2: RFK go conspiracy theorists were right again, you know, And
Speaker 2: I just think it's funny that, you know, they're just
Speaker 2: vindicating conspiracy theorists. So everybody questions everything and they just
Speaker 2: want to throw out the WHO system, right.
Speaker 1: Like it's really it's just incredible. We're paying taxes to
Speaker 1: be like psychologically, we're psychological warfare against us. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: interesting because the head of the NI, of the what
Speaker 1: is it, what's Tolsey Gabbert, came out of psychological operations
Speaker 1: of Bragg, right, just like Akino.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and Joe cantingher, you know, train together and whatnot.
Speaker 2: You know, So I think that's interesting as well. Uh,
Speaker 2: you know, because he's a part of this exposure. Guy,
Speaker 2: I think, you know, he comes out, he's against the
Speaker 2: Iran war. He's going to be probably a future candidacy probably,
Speaker 2: that's to me very obvious. But people don't have a
Speaker 2: we we know from history that people don't have a
Speaker 2: capability for nuance in these situations. So people will be
Speaker 2: shown all this exposure and be kind of driven towards
Speaker 2: their own conclusion, but it's not gonna be really their conclusion.
Speaker 2: They're gonna think they're making up their mind, but they're not.
Speaker 2: That's the point of mind wars, right, And so that's
Speaker 2: what we're watching. And so there's a few people like
Speaker 2: me and you that may see it, but most people
Speaker 2: will see this exposure say let's do what the you know,
Speaker 2: system wants.
Speaker 1: Essentially, they're really good at it. They're really good at
Speaker 1: manufacturing consent, like you can see it from the left,
Speaker 1: but they've always been able to get away with a
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff. Like if you watch TV, you
Speaker 1: think that the war against uh Iran and all these
Speaker 1: false flags and lives are all real. Like I'm I'm like,
Speaker 1: if you don't watch TV like me, and you talk
Speaker 1: to people watch TV, you might as well. I mean,
Speaker 1: in my opinion, like I'm on the other side mentally
Speaker 1: of like the other side of the Grand Canyon, Like
Speaker 1: these people are on a hold man. We're literally talking
Speaker 1: face to face, like I've talked to people like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think we should have gone in. You know, we're
Speaker 1: gonna get nukes. I'm like, in my mind, I don't
Speaker 1: say it, but I'm like they've been saying this for
Speaker 1: forty years.
Speaker 2: They're gonna get Like I made the mistake. If I
Speaker 2: made the mistake to say that, you know, yeah, they'll
Speaker 2: definitely brush you off. I was like, you know, isn't
Speaker 2: it weird that you know they've been telling you that
Speaker 2: for forty years that they're gonna have it in two weeks,
Speaker 2: you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, this is the manufacturing consent and and
Speaker 1: Trump is in on it. He's just bounding people with
Speaker 1: like why Iran as bad? They'd never done anything to me?
Speaker 3: Like, right me either?
Speaker 2: You know you mentioned that they're really good at at this. Well,
Speaker 2: we talked about this last time a little bit. It's
Speaker 2: good to brush over it again. Psychohistory. We talked about
Speaker 2: how that was the branch of mathematics of the human
Speaker 2: reaction of both social and economic stimuli. So it's like,
Speaker 2: if you have enough people to make a conglomerate, as
Speaker 2: long as they're not aware that they're, you know, being analyzed,
Speaker 2: then you can have a truly kind of a true
Speaker 2: conclusive idea of what they'll do when you give them
Speaker 2: certain stimulus, whatever that is, whether it's a false flag
Speaker 2: or you know, some kind of LGBTQ narrative, whatever it is.
Speaker 3: Right, these are all under the same umbrella, right.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of this idea of hypnosis, Like Ericsonian
Speaker 1: hypnosis is supposed to listen your response without you knowing it.
Speaker 1: So like exactly, Eric, wouldn't you know, Andrew, don't you
Speaker 1: think it's a great idea that we attack you around
Speaker 1: to keep us safe. Like that's putting the idea into
Speaker 1: your brain, Like you're.
Speaker 2: Asking flatter you in the process, like yeah, you think it's.
Speaker 1: A smart move, Andrew, if we do this now and
Speaker 1: a little pain now for pleasure later or what's the
Speaker 1: thing now? Like what's the what's the little phrase they're
Speaker 1: using is not excursion, but it's like pain now and.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah pain, yeah, short term pain, and that's the
Speaker 2: that's the classic like you know, two weeks to flatten
Speaker 2: the curve, right, Like that's what that is.
Speaker 3: That's what that sounds like. It's very similar in messaging.
Speaker 1: You know, we're six weeks into this war so far,
Speaker 1: Like it's not stopped.
Speaker 3: So no, not at all. They tell you it has,
Speaker 3: but it hasn't.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: They say that it needs to be an art and
Speaker 2: science and treated as such. And I think that there's
Speaker 2: some people that really are good at this, Like it
Speaker 2: is an art and science and that's interesting.
Speaker 1: It's very cruelly in phrase, because that's what magic is,
Speaker 1: the art and science of affecting change and conformance with will.
Speaker 1: Like that phrase comes out what it is?
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So this achilles heel of mind war is that
Speaker 2: they need to deliver the goods that they are judged
Speaker 2: by the target audience to deliver.
Speaker 3: So if I tell you, like if I'm running a
Speaker 3: styop and tell you.
Speaker 2: Know X, Y or Z is gonna happen, I need
Speaker 2: to deliver the goods, right, And so that's something that
Speaker 2: I don't think they're doing as much as you know
Speaker 2: they need to. And so that's why these kind of
Speaker 2: fall apart on their face, right right.
Speaker 1: I think you're right. I mean, do you know what's
Speaker 1: interesting is like he dedicates this to all these people.
Speaker 1: Krassner is a close intimate to Jeffrey Epstein. He's talking
Speaker 1: to He's sending emails to Epstein all the time, and
Speaker 1: it's really something else. And then Lansdale is like the
Speaker 1: ugly American. Like there's all these lily as part of
Speaker 1: like buying control stuff, talking to dolphins. For Rec's dad,
Speaker 1: Peter Wreck, there's a direct Croly terr I hear because
Speaker 1: the Rec's dad was close friends with Crowley. Wow.
Speaker 2: See, okay, you got a good insight on all these names.
Speaker 2: I love this. You gotta get insight.
Speaker 1: Because like the rec. His dad was something called he
Speaker 1: wrote something called the Fatherland, which Croley wrote for so
Speaker 1: they were very close friends. And then there's Valelli. We
Speaker 1: know We've talked about him. Zaas was a hypnotist kind
Speaker 1: of guy. He's a total doctor. Like, why is Stone
Speaker 1: in here? I don't know, Roger, Yeah, Oliver Stone the film.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that makes sense.
Speaker 1: You know, Sidney Riley was a spy. It's a Jewish spy.
Speaker 1: But that's not his real name. Matchiavelli of course, as
Speaker 1: him off. He quotes Kartine was also from a Nicoult family.
Speaker 1: And this is the guy who died in the Who's
Speaker 1: found in a closet, like, you know, hanging from a closet,
Speaker 1: Like it's a very strange thing. Del Gatto is a
Speaker 1: guy who, like uh I, believed in putting implants into
Speaker 1: people's brains.
Speaker 3: I've heard of that name.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you ever see that? Have you ever seen
Speaker 1: the video of the bull that stops, you know, and
Speaker 1: he hits a button in the Bull stops Jose Delgado?
Speaker 1: Who did that? Out of Yale? No less, you know
Speaker 1: you're talking about Yale Law school. Yeah, Ian Fleming, you
Speaker 1: know that's James Bond. Fowles wrote a book called The
Speaker 1: Magician based on Crow. Supposedly like these are just like
Speaker 1: what he knows and who he knows. He has a
Speaker 1: good frame of reference. But the craft I thing is
Speaker 1: a direct tied to ee. You know.
Speaker 3: That's crazy.
Speaker 2: You know that Lonsdale, that Lonsdale one of the owners
Speaker 2: of Pounteers at Lonsdale.
Speaker 3: I wonder if it's it's probably not the same.
Speaker 1: Is Lansdale l A and St A l It's O
Speaker 1: N never mind, Yeah, Lonsdale, Joe Lonsdale is different. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: Lansdale was. There's I mean, it's interesting Stone because according
Speaker 1: to other people that have seen pictures, Lansdale was at
Speaker 1: the site of the death of JFK in nineteen sixty three.
Speaker 1: He was seen kind of walking with the three Boembs.
Speaker 1: His back was to the camera, but people are like,
Speaker 1: that's his ring and his gates and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: So no shit, yeah, no esterbooks. But this guy was
Speaker 1: cruelly I six. He was something before I six. It
Speaker 1: was called the Secret Intelligence Service before they branched it
Speaker 1: off to five six, So he preceded the other kind
Speaker 1: of intel stuff LIZZYSI. He wasn't in. He was British Intel,
Speaker 1: no question about it.
Speaker 2: Another little insight here that I think is important is
Speaker 2: he gives a definition. It talks about the psychological and
Speaker 2: physiological physio psychological conditioning of all participants in a socio
Speaker 2: political problem first to cooperatively stabilize it without violence. But
Speaker 2: it says here implementing a moral computed community to supersede it.
Speaker 2: I think that's another thing they don't really deliver on.
Speaker 2: They're kind of inverting that. They want to give it
Speaker 2: a more of an immoral community instead, and so the
Speaker 2: degradation of society rather than establishing more of a what
Speaker 2: he would call, he wants to establish more of like
Speaker 2: a utopian kind of police state, one that kind of
Speaker 2: is ram where everybody's kind of enlightened beings and you know,
Speaker 2: this kind of utopian kind of what what you would
Speaker 2: have me. I mean, it's kind of odd because he
Speaker 2: comes off as this satanic, you know, child satanic abuser,
Speaker 2: but he also does throughout this speak in a way
Speaker 2: of like utopian, which I don't know. You could argue
Speaker 2: everybody says Lucifer is going to establish a utopian people
Speaker 2: will love it, but it will also be a state
Speaker 2: of like satanic control. So you could argue that, yeah,
Speaker 2: he's giving he's selling dreams, right, right.
Speaker 1: But he's trying to like push forward the idea of
Speaker 1: psychological operations. What's the Lansdale was a huge psychological operator,
Speaker 1: by the way. I don't know if you know that.
Speaker 1: He's heavily involved in psychological operations in the Philippines, but
Speaker 1: very creative stuff in Operation Phoenix, and he was very
Speaker 1: close to the Vietnam War as well. But when he
Speaker 1: was the guy was masseyse of mag says was in
Speaker 1: the Philippines. They helped install him and they would they
Speaker 1: would go after the natives, and Lansdale invented this blood
Speaker 1: sucking vampire creature where he would take dead bodies and
Speaker 1: drain them of blood and leave them back on trails
Speaker 1: so that the natives would find them and get freaked out.
Speaker 1: So you would literally do like really create, really dark,
Speaker 1: creative stuff, and it earned him the nickname the Ugly American.
Speaker 3: Damn, I never heard of it.
Speaker 2: That's crazy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, you should have. I've done a couple of shows.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So he was like really one of the real early
Speaker 1: psychological operations officers. And I think also and also yeah,
Speaker 1: so so Akino knows this and that's what Fleming was
Speaker 1: too before before like he was the British version of
Speaker 1: a psychological operations officer and he was so good that
Speaker 1: he lured us to the UK where they captured him
Speaker 1: like number three in the the German Mill, I mean
Speaker 1: in the in the third Reich, right under Hitler, and
Speaker 1: I think, uh, yeah, Himmler or one of the I forgot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was top five for sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, top five. But they lured him in and he
Speaker 1: thought he was going to go talk to the conservative
Speaker 1: like UK and help stop the war. And it was
Speaker 1: all like Fleming's idea. He was doing cold and also
Speaker 1: Fleming also was another one of the other things that
Speaker 1: he did. Well, you want to talk about dead bodies, like,
Speaker 1: there was an operation I can't remember the name off
Speaker 1: the top of my head, but he dumped a body
Speaker 1: in the Mediterranean with fake information that the Allies were
Speaker 1: going to land in the south of France before the
Speaker 1: Normandy invasion. So he tricked all these people into thinking
Speaker 1: that we were going to do something through Marseille or
Speaker 1: the Allies were going to do something Marseille, and so
Speaker 1: the Germans diverted resources there and it was all fake documents.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they've been running game like this for a
Speaker 2: while and this is nothing new. And that guy seems
Speaker 2: like he was in the first iteration of this.
Speaker 1: You know, that's why Flemy could write all those novels,
Speaker 1: because he really was a spot shit.
Speaker 2: Just to back of what I was saying a minute ago,
Speaker 2: it says any operative must operate with moral valor and dignity,
Speaker 2: otherwise anything less will lead to Orwellian thought police societies.
Speaker 2: He says that this is a blueprint to lead to
Speaker 2: Orwellian thought police societies if you don't utilize it correctly.
Speaker 2: So that's why I pointed out that they're not utilizing
Speaker 2: it correctly. But do they want to? Because he says
Speaker 2: that this will lead to an Orlean thought police society,
Speaker 2: and maybe that's what they want, Maybe they don't necessarily,
Speaker 2: I mean clearly that's where we're heading with the anti
Speaker 2: Semitism laws and different things like that. Right, the IHR
Speaker 2: a definition where you can't criticize another country. Uh, these
Speaker 2: are you know, I mean fuck even if you you know,
Speaker 2: if you believe that Geo Jesus was killed by Jews,
Speaker 2: I mean pretty much Christianity is then thrown out. So
Speaker 2: there's a lot of things you know where Yeah, the
Speaker 2: thought police thing is is a current.
Speaker 1: No question about it. Yeah, that Operation mince Meat was
Speaker 1: another one. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, I've heard that one.
Speaker 2: That might be.
Speaker 1: Michael. He addressed him as one of the royal means
Speaker 1: and put fictitious stuff on there.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, that's where I've heard that name from. Mince Meat.
Speaker 1: Yep. His boss was Fleming's boss was John Godfrey, So
Speaker 1: that was that was it. Then it's really incredible stuff.
Speaker 2: Mmm uh yeah. So you know in the end there
Speaker 2: it just says we have to value human individuality, which
Speaker 2: again I just think is ironic that he's writing this, right,
Speaker 2: you know, it seems that he wants to uphold the
Speaker 2: constitutional values while we also operate in this way on
Speaker 2: the because he wants a better society. But again he's
Speaker 2: handing over a blueprint that could be manipulated very easily
Speaker 2: and used for control. So maybe he maybe that was
Speaker 2: the plan the whole time and he's just saving face.
Speaker 1: Interesting.
Speaker 3: Uh So Page sixty one we could look at symbology.
Speaker 1: Let's go there, let's see I can figure out how
Speaker 1: to work.
Speaker 2: Sixty one alright, talks more about psychological warfare, propaganda, the
Speaker 2: use of cy war psy ops.
Speaker 1: Sixty one. There it is strategy is blanch.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it goes from strategies as psychological operation.
Speaker 3: We could look at some of that.
Speaker 2: Uh just see if we see any uh, you know,
Speaker 2: correlations with you know, our everyday messaging.
Speaker 1: Let's see, it's the old term, right, these are old concepts.
Speaker 2: According to Yeah, I mean information, information, education, persuasion, coercion, compliance,
Speaker 2: and thought reform.
Speaker 3: These are the things we're trying to achieve.
Speaker 1: All right, that's the whole thing of MKL, all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. He mentions these early programs too. He knows
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I think he was heavily involved because he
Speaker 2: talks about after Vietnam the frustration they had about you know,
Speaker 2: and he was saying it's because we didn't use these enough.
Speaker 3: I think that he was well read in on it.
Speaker 2: Clearly he may have been the division for SYOPS and
Speaker 2: was pissed off he didn't get utilized enough. It seems
Speaker 2: that after that Paul Velelli said, all right, let's let's
Speaker 2: get this going. Let's get this blueprint made so we
Speaker 2: can use psyops in mind war first and a Quina again.
Speaker 2: Remember a Quno's whole thing is we want to get
Speaker 2: rid of any use for kinetic warfare altogether, which means
Speaker 2: any weaponry we don't need to use it ever, So
Speaker 2: imagine how all encompassing they need this to be to
Speaker 2: accomplish that, you know.
Speaker 1: Right, and you don't have to fire a shot if
Speaker 1: you win the mind war, it's over right.
Speaker 2: Yep, Absolutely, it's easier. You know, let's be honest. It's
Speaker 2: easier if you don't have a free society. It's easier
Speaker 2: if you have an Orwellian thought police society rather than
Speaker 2: one perpetuate where people get to have, you know, free dissent. Right.
Speaker 2: Just it's just, uh, you're right here.
Speaker 1: He is privacy of the constitution. So he just says, yeah,
Speaker 1: we can still have the constitution. Who cares?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, he tried. Like I said, he lays out
Speaker 2: a good argument. Now again, this is a military you know,
Speaker 2: this for the military. So I think he's just you know,
Speaker 2: he's being official, you know, trying to keep it because
Speaker 2: in mind Star even mentioned he says, I went from
Speaker 2: a fully materialistic standpoint, all physical. He doesn't talk about
Speaker 2: anything having to do with the soul in mind Wars
Speaker 2: mind Star. He takes this concept and adds in the
Speaker 2: idea of the subconscious soul and all these type of things,
Speaker 2: and that's where it gets really interesting.
Speaker 3: Uh later on.
Speaker 1: Interesting one more time. Philip Taylor Black Propaganda from Fort Bragg.
Speaker 1: That must be interest us, page seventy eight.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he worked with doctor what was his name? Doctor?
Speaker 1: Is it SaaS or Ces?
Speaker 2: Yep, Gregory as Cees from the JFK Special Warfare Center,
Speaker 2: And that is who I bet, I bet that's who
Speaker 2: we worked with at Fort Bragg to get that. From
Speaker 2: page ninety one, it says, I have a note discrediting Stargate.
Speaker 3: I'm curious to see what that is.
Speaker 1: Sorry, you're mind ninety one may not be your ninety one.
Speaker 1: That's there's Stargate ESP.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, project Stargate because it talks
Speaker 2: about Project Jedi Project Stargate, and then after that it
Speaker 2: gets into something interesting the Homo Electromagneticus, which we'll talk about,
Speaker 2: but uh, yeah, he pretty much he talks about how
Speaker 2: none of that shit worked as far as the sensationalist
Speaker 2: telekinesis psychokinesis right, These things didn't really work, you know,
Speaker 2: people didn't really astro project, But there they did learn
Speaker 2: a lot about the subconscious mind as far as operating
Speaker 2: within the subconscious to manipulate people. And so I think
Speaker 2: He's trying to dispel some of the sensationalist aspects to
Speaker 2: some of these projects while also showing with the real
Speaker 2: science behind it that could be utilized.
Speaker 1: That's the first time I've heard of Project Jedi too.
Speaker 3: I had never heard of that.
Speaker 2: So he describes it as After nineteen eighty an article
Speaker 2: in Psychotronic Warfare appeared in the Military Review, the journal
Speaker 2: of the prestigious Command and General Staff College. The Army
Speaker 2: in nineteen eighty four launched a five month experiment called
Speaker 2: Project Jedi, named after the Star Wars movie knights who
Speaker 2: were able to perform exotic magical feats. Project Jedi sought
Speaker 2: to use neurolinguistic programming as a way of teaching recruits
Speaker 2: to fire weapons. It was done through psychological analysis of
Speaker 2: the thought patterns of experts shooters as they fired. And
Speaker 2: so they were just trying to use NLPs to guide
Speaker 2: imagery and other convey instructions.
Speaker 1: Right, And the foundation of NLP is like Erickson, So
Speaker 1: that's it.
Speaker 2: Like, Yeah, there was a psychotherapist, Georgi Lasanov.
Speaker 3: Are you familiar with that name?
Speaker 1: No, I've never heard that. Who's that.
Speaker 2: In the nineteen seventies, something called suggest Apedia was developed
Speaker 2: by a Bulgarian psychotherapist, Georgie Georgie Lazanov. It involved taichi
Speaker 2: like calisthenics, followed by mental relaxation and breathing exercises like
Speaker 2: wim Hoff, followed with a guided imagery to reduce students'
Speaker 2: natural resistance to learning. While not unreasonable for normal teaching environments,
Speaker 2: it would have no application to mind war. So he
Speaker 2: was just discrediting as far as using it for mind war.
Speaker 2: And again that's what a lot of that was, what
Speaker 2: can we use and what can't we use out of
Speaker 2: these projects we have done thus far.
Speaker 1: And then he goes into subliminal involuntary side control, right
Speaker 1: slipc Can you talk about that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the entire spectrum of external influences. And so
Speaker 2: they try to take natural processes of the human thought,
Speaker 2: like awareness, alertness in their disposition, and then they influence
Speaker 2: them naturally an artificially. Artificially. They ad just to like
Speaker 2: the maximum amount of subjects that they can and essentially
Speaker 2: it relies on conscious century transmission and reception. Uh So
Speaker 2: some subliminal techniques he doesn't really get super in depth.
Speaker 2: He talks about, Uh, there's a target actor's mind and
Speaker 2: body that they're trying to act on. And here the
Speaker 2: object is the objective is not to do bodily or
Speaker 2: mentally damage, but rather to incline the target to be
Speaker 2: more receptive to the s l i PC. So they're
Speaker 2: trying to get people's thoughts, awareness, and alertness and disposition
Speaker 2: condition to a place where they can act on them,
Speaker 2: not unconsciously with this l i PC.
Speaker 3: That's essentially what it is.
Speaker 1: So so it's like you're influencing p people without their
Speaker 1: conscious as.
Speaker 2: The whole plan respont and you want to enact on
Speaker 2: You want their response to be more like they want
Speaker 2: to obey more without really knowing that they're obeying. And
Speaker 2: so you're trying to do it in ways where you're
Speaker 2: getting them. Like you said earlier, what do you think
Speaker 2: don't you think that the war, you know, where you're
Speaker 2: kind of walking them into it, but in every way possible,
Speaker 2: whether it's physically without them knowing. Because again there's a
Speaker 2: spot before we kind of brushed over it mentions how
Speaker 2: everybody believes that they have the independent thought pattern, but
Speaker 2: people don't have an independent thought pattern, and we need
Speaker 2: to study kind of the data of everybody's joint thought
Speaker 2: patterns and act on those.
Speaker 1: Right. That's the interesting thing about the common worldview of
Speaker 1: the average person. They totally believe they're independent.
Speaker 2: YEAHI is.
Speaker 1: I mean especially it's it's hard to believe because we're
Speaker 1: bombarded with propaganda twenty four to seven. Like it really
Speaker 1: is blind more like you're and it comes from all
Speaker 1: angles TV, corporate, political, interpersonal, you know whatever. Even if
Speaker 1: you're like you have somebody in your life who's not
Speaker 1: really on your side, they usually try to convince you
Speaker 1: they are, you know.
Speaker 3: All kinds of stuff like that, coercion.
Speaker 2: So I had a theory, and you know, this book
Speaker 2: proves a theory that I had in something called Silent
Speaker 2: Weapons that I did.
Speaker 3: And Silent Weapons was just.
Speaker 2: A series that I did on MK Ultra and it
Speaker 2: was called Silent Weapons because the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars,
Speaker 2: and so of course I wrote I called it that.
Speaker 3: It was just a different take on MK Ultra.
Speaker 2: And my whole theory with that was because Silent Weapons
Speaker 2: for Quiet Wars talks about how they want to be
Speaker 2: able to control people with the push of a button,
Speaker 2: whether it's economically, socially, whatever, And so my whole concept
Speaker 2: was mk ultra, the sensationalism behind it, the astral projection, telepathy,
Speaker 2: all that may have been a cover story for what
Speaker 2: we're talking about here, which is the controlling of the
Speaker 2: mind or controlling of the body. Well, he gets into
Speaker 2: this next chap, your Homo electro Magneticus, which following everything
Speaker 2: we just went over Project Jedi, disproving that talking about
Speaker 2: the subliminal involuntary psycho control. He follows it with the
Speaker 2: fact that we're electromagnetic beings. We can't control their mind
Speaker 2: and body on this like weird woo woo level, but
Speaker 2: we can use technology to hardwire this mystical concept into
Speaker 2: reality through digital technologies, which is literally the whole premise
Speaker 2: of my series of Silent Weapons. And he kind of
Speaker 2: proves it with this next chapter. So I thought that
Speaker 2: was super interesting.
Speaker 1: Right, So they're influencing us through technology, and he think
Speaker 1: he writes about that and with the original mind Word document.
Speaker 2: To you, right, Yes, he brushes into it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, definitely, he expands that on here.
Speaker 2: He just talked about how the human body is a
Speaker 2: complex electromagnetic machine, including the thought processes, which is of
Speaker 2: course what mind Wars is. Where about humans of course,
Speaker 2: don't normally think of themselves as machines, but his conscious
Speaker 2: unique beings. This cast humanity and not a physical but
Speaker 2: a metaphysical image and explains both the basis and for
Speaker 2: attraction of religions, which, by the way, he even talks
Speaker 2: about eschatology being used for mind wars, which we see
Speaker 2: right now going on in our military. I mean, Pete Eggs,
Speaker 2: that just Peteggs, that just quoted a Bible script scripture
Speaker 2: that came out of pulp fiction. It's not even real
Speaker 2: incredible stuff.
Speaker 1: This is really incredible.
Speaker 2: It's Hollywood version of Christianity like this.
Speaker 1: Is, and also like Judeo Christianity, and yeahionis Christianity doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: It doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: No, Jesus is the last Covenant for everyone. For the
Speaker 2: Jews too, He is their savior, but they're rejecting him,
Speaker 2: and then they're making Christians reject him in the process
Speaker 2: of saying Judeo Christian. They don't even understand they're rejecting
Speaker 2: Christ when they say those words. They're revers Yeah, that's.
Speaker 1: They are anti Christ. It's that simple.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not even like I'm yeah, and I'm not
Speaker 2: even like an every Sunday churchgoer. But I understand these concepts.
Speaker 2: You know, my grandma was, you know, a nun and
Speaker 2: my dad with the church. But you know, I've read
Speaker 2: it all, Buddhism everything, but yeah, there's some truths in there.
Speaker 2: And I think that it's crazy to watch Christians just
Speaker 2: totally reject their own teachings. It's wild.
Speaker 1: They have to reject their own teachings to support at
Speaker 1: least cultural Israel. I think you just have to because
Speaker 1: they hate Christian They're bombing Christian churches. They bombed like Cana,
Speaker 1: they bombed like the Road to Mas, like these important
Speaker 1: Christian churches. They believe the living daylights out of them
Speaker 1: and killed Christian people. Like it is so crazy. You
Speaker 1: just can't an believe that, like the opposite of like
Speaker 1: the Christian teachings is people are supporting.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, well uh you know now this is something
Speaker 2: that blew my mind too. People have talked about the
Speaker 2: doubling of the brain many times, and they attributed to
Speaker 2: meet the cooking of food technology. Right, well, he ties
Speaker 2: it to something that I thought was super interesting.
Speaker 3: It's on the next page here if you want to
Speaker 3: go to it.
Speaker 1: Just you know, what's the what page rummer, is it.
Speaker 2: Shit ninety four? Okay, I'm yeah, I guess you went
Speaker 2: a low pezz it. It's super interesting. He talks about
Speaker 2: Francis Ivanhoe and he's a pharmacologist and anthropologist at San Francisco.
Speaker 2: He made a statistical survey of the brain case volume
Speaker 2: known as the Paleolithic human skulls. That's correlated with the
Speaker 2: increase with the magnetic field strength and the major advances
Speaker 2: in human culture during the same period. So his whole
Speaker 2: concept is the magnetic field in our Earth's you know,
Speaker 2: people talked about like the freak, the what's it called
Speaker 2: the resonance human residence? Have you heard of that?
Speaker 1: It sounds familiar though, So the earth.
Speaker 2: The Earth always vibrates at a certain resonance level. It's
Speaker 2: a frequency, and apparently it changes over the course of time.
Speaker 2: This is kind of like this is the ideologies in
Speaker 2: like Freemasonry, everything, but it seems to be true where
Speaker 2: there is this kind of evolating it's where the whole
Speaker 2: concept of ascension comes from. Oh, we're heading to the
Speaker 2: fourth dimension. We're gonna send that's what they're talking about.
Speaker 2: But so he's tying the doubling of the brain size
Speaker 2: about three hundred thousand years ago. Both of these periods
Speaker 2: correspond with major ice ages, and he talks about widespread
Speaker 2: domesticated domestication of Homo erectus around this time. I'm trying
Speaker 2: to get to the part where he speaks about the
Speaker 2: electromagnetic So he proposed a direct link from the magnetic
Speaker 2: field through the growth hormone regulator pathways in the brain.
Speaker 2: So to account for the sharp evolutionary gains, he suggests
Speaker 2: that part of the hippocampus, a section of the brain's
Speaker 2: temporal lobe, acts as a transducer of em energy. A
Speaker 2: part of the hippocampus called Ammone's horn and arch with
Speaker 2: one way nerve traffic directed by his strong current flow
Speaker 2: may read out variations in the field strength, feeding them
Speaker 2: by a bundle of well documented pathways called the forex
Speaker 2: to the hippothalamus. So essentially we're electric, Like he's talking
Speaker 2: about the functionalities in our brain that operate with electromagnetic
Speaker 2: frequencies pulses, so obviously direct energy weapons, you know, as
Speaker 2: we'll get into right, That's what he kind of explains
Speaker 2: for the rest of the chapter. So this is just
Speaker 2: laying context to this idea that like dominant micropulsion frequency
Speaker 2: can be used in today's fields.
Speaker 1: All right, so this is Havana syndrome. It's ci stuff.
Speaker 1: It's all these people. They just don't know the technology.
Speaker 1: And some of them may be telling, if not all
Speaker 1: of them may be telling. The truth is said. They're
Speaker 1: being hit by electromagnetic exactly microwave frequencies. There's something subliminal, right,
Speaker 1: that's the whole idea. It's the name of this chapter,
Speaker 1: is the subliminal. Because nobody's telling you about havana system
Speaker 1: that he'll just feel sick or wax.
Speaker 2: Yeah, whatever, And that's a really cool concept. If everybody's
Speaker 2: curious to look more into that, I know I will be.
Speaker 2: Robert Becker, MD and Gary Sheldon wrote a book called
Speaker 2: The Body, Electric Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life.
Speaker 3: Highly recommend that nineteen eighty five book.
Speaker 1: They're at the bottom of their references.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Becker came across evidence from both from his research
Speaker 2: in certain kind of EMF radiation research that can either
Speaker 2: generate or accelerate damage to living organisms. He cited instances
Speaker 2: of the Russian researcher who found areas of cell death
Speaker 2: in the brains of rabbits after subjecting them to magnetic fields.
Speaker 2: The fields were found to activated stress hormones within the rabbits,
Speaker 2: but in a way that rabbits could not consciously sense
Speaker 2: any stress. And so Becker was one of the scientists
Speaker 2: asked to by the US Navy to review possible side
Speaker 2: effects from Project Sanguine, which is the extremely elf wave,
Speaker 2: extremely low frequency transmitter that the Navy intended to build
Speaker 2: in Wisconsin to communicate with nuclear submarines. So this guy was, yeah, crazy.
Speaker 1: Dude, that's so crazy. Like these guys are tinkering around
Speaker 1: with this stuff and then it's subliminal. You just don't know,
Speaker 1: Like some of these people, I don't feel well. I
Speaker 1: don't fill around cell towers or whatever. I mean, cell
Speaker 1: towers have a heavy microwave stuff. But imagine if like
Speaker 1: a cell tower isn't just sending electromagnetic frequency to the
Speaker 1: cell phone. What if it's a sixty sending it to you.
Speaker 2: Or Yeah, like that's the purpose of it, right, And
Speaker 2: that's the sixty agenda, dude, I'm telling you. It all
Speaker 2: gets right into So this talks about sang juine and
Speaker 2: what they've found.
Speaker 3: Now, this is interesting.
Speaker 1: I think the word is sanguine sanguine.
Speaker 3: It's like sanguine sanguine sanguine. Yeah, my bad.
Speaker 2: Uh. You know there's a there's a rapper and colum
Speaker 2: sanguine paradise.
Speaker 1: Sanguine means optimistic.
Speaker 3: Okay, okay.
Speaker 2: So we talked about similar fields that have been shown
Speaker 2: to raise human blood trichglycerides, the harbinger of stroke, heart attack,
Speaker 2: tri u in a arterio sclerosis, arterio sclerosis.
Speaker 3: So essentially it can suck you up.
Speaker 1: Crazy. That's the sixth gen. I actually know a couple
Speaker 1: of people who moved away from cell phones and they
Speaker 1: feel so much better. Yeah, they really felt affected by it.
Speaker 1: And I think that's the whole thing is that it's
Speaker 1: a subliminal effect. Like at one time in my career
Speaker 1: I worked with cell phones like it's a huge property
Speaker 1: investment and they're super dangerous. They have to shut them down.
Speaker 1: People cannot work on them. They will sterilize employees. And
Speaker 1: if you get too close, you can just feel the
Speaker 1: hair on your arms, just like you're touching like something
Speaker 1: like from Tesla or something. Yeah, you can feel the
Speaker 1: electromagnetic frequencies.
Speaker 2: Or somebody said hardening of the arteries over here isn't
Speaker 2: it isn't it curious to drink? You know, the the
Speaker 2: plague we had in twenty twenty one. Isn't it curious
Speaker 2: that that's kind of what we see is a lot
Speaker 2: of blood clots, of a lot of hardening of the art.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that's the same thing, but I
Speaker 2: would imagine it's not far off.
Speaker 1: Guys. The six G agenda and the six G realization
Speaker 1: is much scarier than you think, because I think that
Speaker 1: they I mean, there were stories during this whole event
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty one you're talking about where they gave
Speaker 1: people that something in their body where they actually had
Speaker 1: that number that they could read it like you're a
Speaker 1: bar code. You ever forgot?
Speaker 2: Yeah, you mentioned that. You mentioned that to me before
Speaker 2: you said everybody's got a shit. I'd never I know,
Speaker 2: I blinked that.
Speaker 1: Other now I'm blanking on the number. But like they
Speaker 1: literally did that in graves where they could literally have
Speaker 1: a number. Somebody in the chat probably knows this, but
Speaker 1: it would like be a number blink. But imagine if
Speaker 1: you're a cell phone tower and they can find you
Speaker 1: and through the six GY agenda, through this like DARPA
Speaker 1: technology and just fry you like, that's kind of problem, man.
Speaker 2: So I did mac Idea made Yes, Thanks Diana. So
Speaker 2: I did a show with Elena Freeland. It's gonna be
Speaker 2: coming out. That's her.
Speaker 1: That's the one I'm telling Oh no, not Elena Freeland,
Speaker 1: somebody else.
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, she's allow work. She did a lot of
Speaker 2: work with the original guy who was studying geoengineering, so
Speaker 2: like right particle yep, and so she did a lot
Speaker 2: of work with him. That's where she got her start
Speaker 2: kind of and since then she's read. She wrote about
Speaker 2: Margellen's in the nineties synthetic biology, like synthetic fibers. So
Speaker 2: I had her on the other day. It was an
Speaker 2: awesome conversation. We're gonna be dropping that tomorrow. But yeah,
Speaker 2: it gets into all this stuff and that's what they're doing,
Speaker 2: you know. And that mixed with the episode I did
Speaker 2: with this guy Eric from FM eight. He's fire Medic eight.
Speaker 2: He does he only studies synthetic fibers. He'll literally put
Speaker 2: a mosquito in a peatrie dish and there'll be fibers
Speaker 2: coming out of it and he'll he'll fuck with it.
Speaker 2: And at one point it pulled apart and broke and
Speaker 2: he put the fiber back next to the fiber it
Speaker 2: broke off of, and it reconnected. It reattached, and then
Speaker 2: he literally pushed it and it made a bend, so
Speaker 2: it's fully attached. And so he's finding that in our bodies. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and so he's saying that essentially, you know, if your
Speaker 2: car the electricity, you know, the wiring goes bad, well,
Speaker 2: the wiring is so intrinsic into the car, you would
Speaker 2: just overlay a new wiring.
Speaker 3: Essentially, they're doing that with our nervous system.
Speaker 2: And so they're hijacking our nervous system with self assembling
Speaker 2: nanoparticles that are replicated inside our body and essentially making
Speaker 2: little fibers that reach out like the nervous system. It's insane, it's.
Speaker 1: So insane, it's so freaking crazy.
Speaker 2: It's next level to think about. But I've seen literal
Speaker 2: physical evidence from him using microscopes and looking inside of
Speaker 2: you know, things in peatrie dishes, and multiple people have
Speaker 2: done this.
Speaker 3: So that's the.
Speaker 1: That's the view that this guy has that's so important,
Speaker 1: and it ties into this book as this idea of
Speaker 1: the mechanical man. Yes, that we're just evolutionary creatures, but
Speaker 1: we can be biohacked. It's the Epstein view. I just
Speaker 1: reposted something by Esterbrooks, who was into hypnotism, where he
Speaker 1: just said, man, the mechanical misfit. See. And it's the
Speaker 1: idea that they they're making it better because you're already
Speaker 1: a misspit. You're already flawed through Darwinism, but through technology,
Speaker 1: I can perfect you perfect. It's actually a satanic kind
Speaker 1: of Luciferian worldview.
Speaker 2: It's Superman crazy. Yeah, yeah, yes.
Speaker 1: And then they call all these people crazy too, right, Drew.
Speaker 1: So the people with morgellons are crazy, the people with
Speaker 1: lime disease are crazy, the people with TI are crazy.
Speaker 1: The people susceptible to microwaves or electromagnet neetic freezy frequency.
Speaker 1: Excuse me? Are all the doctors just write you off?
Speaker 2: I mean, dude. The term tinfoil hat came from them
Speaker 2: saying that a guy was crazy because he went to
Speaker 2: a dentist. He had an implant put it in, and
Speaker 2: next thing he knows, he's hearing voices in his head
Speaker 2: and the only thing that made it better was when
Speaker 2: you put tinfoil around his head. And so he starts
Speaker 2: saying you know when people call it, oh, tinfoil hat,
Speaker 2: you know you're crazy that guy. Did you know the
Speaker 2: patent came out within ten years after that for a
Speaker 2: voice discoll technology back in the fifties, ten years after
Speaker 2: this guy was talking about it, so they were definitely
Speaker 2: probably experimenting on him. And wouldn't you know that you
Speaker 2: can't buy tinfoil nowadays, right, like you can't you can
Speaker 2: only get aluminum foil.
Speaker 3: Interesting, and same thing with like lead paint.
Speaker 2: Your house used to be a fortress, but now we
Speaker 2: used this acrylic paint instead of lead paint, and so
Speaker 2: all these waves get right through your house, and your
Speaker 2: WiFi is a tracker for you and your own home.
Speaker 2: So these are I mean, honestly, when you start extrapolating
Speaker 2: on these concepts, you start to realize like, yeah, this
Speaker 2: is a they've gotten rid of things that would have
Speaker 2: blocked this stuff.
Speaker 3: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: And then the smart meters tie into this stuff like
Speaker 1: it's really see guys, like they're literally doing it right
Speaker 1: under your nose and it is subliminal, right, yes, So
Speaker 1: you're not even supposed to ever realize that's part of
Speaker 1: the mind war, yees, because very normal.
Speaker 2: And we can talk about a little bit of the
Speaker 2: after this, it talks about the brain wave resonance, which
Speaker 2: is kind of everything we're talking about, but the science
Speaker 2: behind how they would manipulate you, which talks about EMR
Speaker 2: and the brain and how it occurs at one to
Speaker 2: three hurts, which are delta waves characteristics of deep sleep,
Speaker 2: and then you have four to seven which is data waves,
Speaker 2: and eight to twelve which is alpha waves, and then
Speaker 2: beta waves which is thirteen to twenty two which is
Speaker 2: the frontal.
Speaker 3: Brain activity area.
Speaker 2: And then the alpha waves is more for like meditation,
Speaker 2: relaxation and searching for patterns. So isn't it funny that
Speaker 2: whenever you look at like five G towers and you
Speaker 2: go look inside the motherboard, it just says ALFA alpha
Speaker 2: and beta is like the two it runs on. So
Speaker 2: when we're talking about this and the connection with all
Speaker 2: is these towers, they're operating on your literal alpha beta waves,
Speaker 2: the same waves that your brain's operating at.
Speaker 3: I don't think that's my mistake.
Speaker 1: I think it's crazy. I've heard a lot of people
Speaker 1: with sleep irregularities too, and it may be because of
Speaker 1: the cell phones and stuff, and you know, there's just
Speaker 1: stories about people close to cell phone towers. You just
Speaker 1: they're just driven crazy, like something close to crazy, because
Speaker 1: it's disrupting the pattern of the human body, the electro
Speaker 1: because you go through these delta, like you said, these
Speaker 1: ways and data, and you have to get into that
Speaker 1: deep sleep, you know, like that's a foundation of your mentalord.
Speaker 2: So you're always in a fighter flight mode. If you're
Speaker 2: always in a fighter flight mode, then it's easier to
Speaker 2: get you to have learned helplessness, which learned helplessness is
Speaker 2: something that is all a part of this. You know,
Speaker 2: these psyops are supposed to make you have learned helplessness
Speaker 2: so you're more susceptible whenever you're being propagandized in the
Speaker 2: mind war, and you just go along with it.
Speaker 3: So it all goes together.
Speaker 2: And it's funny because it's saying that we're getting more
Speaker 2: studies about if you're within certain meters of a cell tower,
Speaker 2: then you're gonna have you know, higher cancer rates whatever. Sure,
Speaker 2: and then you're also simultaneously seeing pushes for more cell
Speaker 2: towers everywhere, so it's like, are we idiots? What do
Speaker 2: we doing?
Speaker 1: You should see the contracts for cell towers when they
Speaker 1: sign them. Up for people's property. There are so many
Speaker 1: like clauses in there about like we're not responsible for injuries, deaths, anything,
Speaker 1: you know, cancers, Like that's what you sign off to
Speaker 1: put it on your property, Like you'll never sue us
Speaker 1: indemnity clauses, Like you're like why do you need this?
Speaker 1: It's the same thing with like the shots too, right,
Speaker 1: Like why do you need to not be sued? Like
Speaker 1: shouldn't you be sued if you to put something harmful
Speaker 1: at It's because they're harmful. They know it, They've always
Speaker 1: known it.
Speaker 3: Yes they do.
Speaker 2: I mean he's talking about all the different evidence of
Speaker 2: higher cancer, you know, and all kinds of mortality rates
Speaker 2: that come from this stuff in this book even I'm
Speaker 2: just kind of skipping over that. But you know, it
Speaker 2: talks about the This is interesting. So it talks about
Speaker 2: SLIPC which is what we talked about earlier.
Speaker 3: I can't really remember what the.
Speaker 1: Hell subliminal information was it? Subliminal involuntary size control.
Speaker 2: Yes, should not be regarded as merely something to use
Speaker 2: against someone else. Rather, it is useful to remove antagonistics
Speaker 2: or disruptive emotions and replace them with receptive and cooperative ones.
Speaker 2: So that's really all they're trying to do with that.
Speaker 2: They're trying to replace your emotions with receptive and cooperative ones.
Speaker 2: So you could just reduce it to that. And here
Speaker 2: again it is important to remember that mine we're always
Speaker 2: redefines the enemy is the problem situation affecting all the
Speaker 2: human participants, not any secment of the participants themselves. So
Speaker 2: this just talks about the brain wave technology. With this
Speaker 2: SLIPC seeks to do is place everyone, including the mind
Speaker 2: warriors themselves, in a positive BWR range. In other words,
Speaker 2: if you're in a positive BWR range and you're more
Speaker 2: susceptible and coercive, and really they just say you're a
Speaker 2: morally valuable person.
Speaker 3: You're a better person. That's really what it is, right.
Speaker 1: Right, So then they reinforce it like it's like the
Speaker 1: full spectrum dominance.
Speaker 2: Of the five mind. Hive mind. That's how you get
Speaker 2: a hive mind.
Speaker 1: You're one of the good ones.
Speaker 2: You just you submit, yes, yes, this is how you
Speaker 2: build the high Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Essence danger posed by EMR to living organisms. That elf
Speaker 1: radiation of thirty to one hundred hurts seems to interfere
Speaker 1: with the body's normal biological cycles. So if you feel
Speaker 1: like your biocycles all messed up and you can't sleep right,
Speaker 1: might to put your cell phone into a Faraday cage
Speaker 1: or a Fara day box or something.
Speaker 2: Yep, So this gets into on we could go to
Speaker 2: page one hundred two for magnetism. I talked about transcranial
Speaker 2: magnetic stimulation, so this would be like a neuralink. Right.
Speaker 2: Phenomenon of magnetism is integral with electricity, and human mental
Speaker 2: activity is electric, so it is unsurprising to find that
Speaker 2: magnetic fields, while not affecting the body's metabolism to a
Speaker 2: significant degree, do extremely small amounts of Anyway, he didn't
Speaker 2: get to where I thought he was there. Anyway, he
Speaker 2: talks about MRI imaging in the area of the brain
Speaker 2: which evaluates the opinions about others and beliefs and moralities.
Speaker 2: So he just gets into a twenty ten MIT neuroscientists
Speaker 2: who discovered that application of the magnetic field to the
Speaker 2: right TPJ, which is temporal perreetal junction part of the brain.
Speaker 2: But anyway, talks about non invasive techniques called transcranial magnetic
Speaker 2: stimulation that temporarily disrupts an individual's ability to make judgments
Speaker 2: based upon previously learned morality. So, in effect, pre indoctrination
Speaker 2: is suppressed, resulting in the subjects tending to judge situations
Speaker 2: more on a discrete cause and effect basis. So in theory,
Speaker 2: TMS could be used to condition personnel to make decisions
Speaker 2: unencumbered by moral, social, or ethical indoctrination. Oh, they could
Speaker 2: do this to people that I don't know, authorities, police, military,
Speaker 2: and they'll just go they wouldn't kill Americans. Well, if
Speaker 2: they're being acted on with this kind of technology, they
Speaker 2: definitely would.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they would. And it kind of goes back to
Speaker 1: that Satanic ethos where the slave shall serve, you know,
Speaker 1: so you're always trying to get these people to be
Speaker 1: under your thumb or hypnotize them or manipulate them.
Speaker 3: I mean, look at that last sentence. Look at that
Speaker 3: last sentence. There.
Speaker 1: Thus, TMS thus approaches in scientific reality the mythical brainwashing
Speaker 1: of classic conspiracy legend Bam boom.
Speaker 3: I mean, dude, this book is insane, man.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's like talking like he knows the conspiracy theories.
Speaker 1: He's like he knows it all. Yeah.
Speaker 2: He literally called out the conspiracy theorist in that in
Speaker 2: that paper, but then left that out here, I think
Speaker 2: because it's just so clear.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's too clear.
Speaker 1: It's just incredible. These are what they're thinking about, Like
Speaker 1: this is what's this is? You know. One of the
Speaker 1: things that you have to realize is that there's so
Speaker 1: much that isn't that is like secretive, right, So these
Speaker 1: are just the things that come out to the public
Speaker 1: or leak out or stuff like that. Imagine what they
Speaker 1: have that is not.
Speaker 2: For the public exactly. So you could, but we could
Speaker 2: extrapolate from this stuff. Like page one oh two, that
Speaker 2: first paragraph there, he talks about nineteen nineties emergent technique
Speaker 2: of functional so magnetic resonance imaging fMRI. It opens a
Speaker 2: new potential for both the reading of thoughts and the
Speaker 2: implantation of them in fMRI. Magnetic sensors detect blood flow
Speaker 2: activity within the brain. By the way, this is important.
Speaker 2: I'll get to it in a minute, because I just
Speaker 2: went into this episode about sensors that are going to
Speaker 2: be on your clothing. By twenty thirty, it's going to
Speaker 2: be mandatory in the UK to have these fingerprint IDs.
Speaker 2: They're sensors that read your body data. Literally what we're
Speaker 2: talking about here. fMRI talked yes, yes, And so if
Speaker 2: you do the right thing and you meet the conditions
Speaker 2: you need to meet, then you can receive bitcoin. Right,
Speaker 2: they could look up bitcoin to these sensors. Right, that's
Speaker 2: the whole whole concept. So I connected that with this
Speaker 2: idea of this fingerprint ID system. Well connect that with
Speaker 2: this this idea that they can read off your blood flow, activity,
Speaker 2: your thought patterns and accurately, uh, you know, judge what
Speaker 2: you're thinking and giving.
Speaker 1: Man, I'm getting off gred. I'm going to throw my
Speaker 1: cell phone away. I don't even want I want to
Speaker 1: flip phone. I want to go back to a luddied thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, everything's corrupt. And then this like invasiveness, the
Speaker 1: secret invasiveness is subliminal invasiveness. Is it's real, like it's happening.
Speaker 1: I think that's why that's why people have like this
Speaker 1: weird thing like let's talking about earlier, where like these
Speaker 1: people are on another planet, Like it's like this might
Speaker 1: be part of it, you know they are. Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: only like one hundred pages into this documentary. No, I know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's why I told you it's gonna be a
Speaker 2: couple of probably a couple, uh, you know, but it's
Speaker 2: worth it. I think, you know, Mindstar and Fine Far
Speaker 2: we could probably do together in another episode, but they're there.
Speaker 3: They all go together. It's very important.
Speaker 2: Like Fine Far is really great because it literally talks
Speaker 2: about I mean, it literally talks about how we're going
Speaker 2: to do it, you know, why we're going to do it.
Speaker 2: Uh you know, it literally how we do it, why
Speaker 2: we do it, our methodology, and it just talks about
Speaker 2: a lot of stuff.
Speaker 3: So I think that's really important. Yeah, it's crazy.
Speaker 2: It talks about police, state, divine law, and natural law.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's I mean.
Speaker 1: What's scary is that there's people going to implement this stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, like we're all these dark arts types on
Speaker 1: a global scale. I think that's why too well, I
Speaker 1: think I think what happened in twenty twenty one was it.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is that stuff implemented. Yeah, now I
Speaker 1: will to do it. You know.
Speaker 2: Now we're in it and we're realizing it, and uh
Speaker 2: it's hard to believe, but I mean I think it's here,
Speaker 2: and he talks about In twenty twelve, NASA announced that
Speaker 2: a system of portals have been identified. Now this is
Speaker 2: important because we're seeing a lot of this orb shit.
Speaker 2: It talks about solar wind and the plasma that comprises
Speaker 2: about ninety nine percent of observable universe on page one
Speaker 2: oh three at the very top. In twenty twelve, NASA
Speaker 2: announced that his system of portals have been identified. We're
Speaker 2: in the MS and sw connect and interact, producing magnetic
Speaker 2: storms and other atmospheric irregularities. What if these little what
Speaker 2: if these little orbs are just like they're producing these
Speaker 2: tiny little portals and that's really all they are. That's
Speaker 2: kind of what they look like, the little spiral little portals.
Speaker 2: Almost In twenty fifteen, National launched the Magnetospheric Multi Scale
Speaker 2: Mission constituting or consisting of four spacecraft to study the
Speaker 2: magnetic reconnection properties of these portals. So the MRP's link
Speaker 2: the Sun's magnetic fields lines to the lines of the
Speaker 2: Earth and releases gigantic bursts of energy like the Aurora borealis.
Speaker 2: And then as these mrp has become predictable, calculable, and mapped,
Speaker 2: m warriors may be able to apply their magnetic fields
Speaker 2: and waves to emotions and thought patterns of humans within
Speaker 2: their range. What the fuck is he talking about? He's
Speaker 2: talking about using plasma like because it consists of ninety
Speaker 2: nine percent of our world, right, so we need to
Speaker 2: tap into this magnetic field. I mean, I don't know, dude,
Speaker 2: this is like sci fi crazy shit to me. But
Speaker 2: it seems like they've got this figured out.
Speaker 1: Clearly, he's done his homework. There's no question about it.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, it's crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Wrong, biology has got new terminology II in terminology, imagine
Speaker 1: what they're studying in these psio you know, things in
Speaker 1: the military just to incredible knowledge.
Speaker 2: So when we're talking about geoengineering and spraying of the skies,
Speaker 2: on page one O eight, he talks about atmospheric ionization,
Speaker 2: and he talks about negatively negatively ionized atmosphere that induces relaxation, alertness,
Speaker 2: and energy and a general sense of well being essentially
Speaker 2: and in humans who breathe it. Right, So keep that
Speaker 2: in mind. A negatively ionized charged atmosphere is going to
Speaker 2: make you relax and generally happy, right, alert, energetic, while
Speaker 2: a positively ion ionized atmosphere induces lethargy, exhaustion, irritability, and confusion. Now,
Speaker 2: if you looked up something like say burium or aluminum,
Speaker 2: which happens to be sprayed in our skies and you
Speaker 2: look up, is it negatively or positively charged in the skies?
Speaker 2: Those are both neutral ions. When they're in the sky.
Speaker 2: The heat and the pressure causes it to be negatively charged,
Speaker 2: which would I'm sorry, positively rather which would render a lethargic,
Speaker 2: confusing state to the air, you know, because of the
Speaker 2: ionization of it. Judging by his own words, it seems
Speaker 2: that the spring of the skies even kind of put
Speaker 2: us in this state of like confusion and irritability and exhaustion, lethargy.
Speaker 2: Do you not feel that way, Like I feel like
Speaker 2: there's something too that that's crazy. I think that here's
Speaker 2: the truth behind what they're doing. You know, clearly, man,
Speaker 2: there's just so many answers in here.
Speaker 3: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Air ionizers that used to be a thing when I
Speaker 1: was growing up, as people would have these air ionizers
Speaker 1: to get like clean the air.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it says air ionizers do not create ions by radiation. Rather,
Speaker 2: they generate an electrical field which causes cautions to ground,
Speaker 2: leaving the air and attaching themselves to the earth or
Speaker 2: other grounded substances. So consequently, a human in the vicinity
Speaker 2: will breathe a higher percentage of anions, which is causing
Speaker 2: a beneficial beneficial sensation. Crazy, he like he understands caditionic
Speaker 2: and antionic air and shit like, I never even heard
Speaker 2: of these words, but I didn't.
Speaker 1: I've never heard the word catitionic in my life.
Speaker 2: I know that's the dry atmosphere conditions and wins mostly
Speaker 2: significant and catabatic and rain shadow wins.
Speaker 3: This is some fucking Japanese words.
Speaker 1: It seems like it's got colors down.
Speaker 3: Yes, so that's that's the funny thing.
Speaker 2: So clearly he's got a lot of this whole you know,
Speaker 2: mystical mystery schools, you know magic. This is what it
Speaker 2: comes down to. Right shapes, colors, you know, the effects
Speaker 2: of the elements, right, things like that on your body
Speaker 2: and hypnotism it talks about on page one fifteen. Oh
Speaker 2: look at that mk ultra arto choke effort to create
Speaker 2: amnesiac assassins the maturity and candidate. Opportunistic, therapeutic and stage
Speaker 2: entertainment venues, often difficult to distinguish from one another, have
Speaker 2: been built up around it, and the claims for its
Speaker 2: efficacy are indeed mesmerizing. The reality is both less fanciful
Speaker 2: and more practical useful to the mind warrior. As discussed above,
Speaker 2: ordinary human sensor awareness is a combination of ninety five
Speaker 2: percent unconscious impressions and five percent conscious ones. The result
Speaker 2: is a tsunami of sensations combining to create the individual
Speaker 2: state of mind at any moment by an effort of
Speaker 2: concentration controlled by either oneself or the outside source. So
Speaker 2: a hypnotist or an EMS device. He's literally saying that
Speaker 2: they're controlling your mind with EMS devices and that it's
Speaker 2: not as fanciful as they say in the maturing candidate,
Speaker 2: but it can be done. Holy shit. So it talks
Speaker 2: about a constant state of confusion and distraction can be
Speaker 2: reduced to background noise and favorite I mean, dude, come on,
Speaker 2: that's everything we see in favor of a more dominant
Speaker 2: and constant attractive stimulus. The individuals not sent into a
Speaker 2: state of unconscious delta sleep, but rather into an alpha
Speaker 2: state of receptive relaxation.
Speaker 3: That's what you were talked about a little bit.
Speaker 2: And then hypnotizing visual object, sound, or other compelling stimulus
Speaker 2: becomes the remains in center of attention.
Speaker 3: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Talks about pomb Hitler all the hypnotism he used, a relaxed,
Speaker 1: tired audience is already alpha receptive.
Speaker 2: It also talked about being in a state of hypnosis
Speaker 2: also allows for a for fraud on the part of both.
Speaker 3: The hypnotists and the subject.
Speaker 2: The hypnotists can issue commands or give suggestions that he
Speaker 2: knows will not be obeyed involuntarily, but simply there's a
Speaker 2: passive willingness to.
Speaker 3: Believe and cooperate.
Speaker 2: The subject responds for the same willingness because the resist
Speaker 2: would require return to a less pleasant, more demanding beta alertness.
Speaker 2: So I guess he's just really acting on the how to. Yeah,
Speaker 2: like you said, that's crazy. Uh yeah, So this is
Speaker 2: the majority of it. He talks about magic on one
Speaker 2: twenty three.
Speaker 1: Let's chuck it out.
Speaker 3: In memory too.
Speaker 2: I think the memory thing is important because they're always
Speaker 2: acting on our I feel like our short term memory
Speaker 2: and attentions. Man, that's been We have had our memories altered.
Speaker 1: No question, they've no question, they've minimized the memory, so
Speaker 1: you don't even forget what happened in the past too.
Speaker 2: I know people that don't even like smoke wheed, you
Speaker 2: know what I mean, Like they're just normal, never really
Speaker 2: have and they even have bad memory.
Speaker 1: They don't know what happened in the past, you know. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: Here it talks about century areas of the brain that
Speaker 2: are more or less permanently wired to the respective physical senses,
Speaker 2: hence their injury or loss, uh are somewhat irreparable.
Speaker 3: But learning and memory functions are not localized.
Speaker 2: So as long as as long as long as enough
Speaker 2: brain cells remain to be usable. So this talks about
Speaker 2: memory is so subtle and elusive. But memory is the
Speaker 2: backbone of one's current situation. It is how one conveniently
Speaker 2: decides who he is and communicates to that to others.
Speaker 2: But still not the nucleus of consciousness itself. So the
Speaker 2: ultimate self, which is the thing that assigns meaning and
Speaker 2: value to both the memory and current sensations. So he's saying,
Speaker 2: we got to alter the meaning and the value that
Speaker 2: people assigned to their memory, and then that would change
Speaker 2: their essentially their memory in a way because their their
Speaker 2: memory is not localized to it's it's localized to their
Speaker 2: to their perceptions.
Speaker 3: Of the memory. That's some crazy way to look at that.
Speaker 1: That is wow.
Speaker 2: So this talks about the man's true self, the original self,
Speaker 2: the first self, and then essentially changing it. Right, because
Speaker 2: nobody knows themselves. So if you manipulate that aspect of
Speaker 2: the fact that people don't really know them their true selves,
Speaker 2: that's where you get into the mindstar aspect of this.
Speaker 3: There is a spiritual aspect to it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, man, that keep people confused, They never find themselves
Speaker 2: and it's easier to manipulate them.
Speaker 1: It's a scary the Army chaplain Corps internal religious psyop,
Speaker 1: like they're willing to like invade the religious space bush.
Speaker 1: I mean Trump, by the way, fired the head of
Speaker 1: the Army Chaplainship recently. So maybe that he implemented siwah
Speaker 1: sy war and got rid of the old one and
Speaker 1: put some new bum in there.
Speaker 2: You know, I wouldn't be surprised. I mean, look at
Speaker 2: for PAULA White, you know, Jesus.
Speaker 1: Right and strike and strike and strike and strike.
Speaker 3: Insane.
Speaker 2: Uh. Magic psychon It talks about the control of the
Speaker 2: environment or the adaptation of the magic to it, establishment
Speaker 2: of the magician's dominant relationship.
Speaker 1: All right, look at this, This is this, this is
Speaker 1: in the context of this, this is really something else.
Speaker 1: Context of what We're going over for the first time
Speaker 1: ever Army Chief of Chaplains fired. We literally are talking
Speaker 1: about Army chaplain corps. Wow, this is April second, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six.
Speaker 2: Insane the frind by Hegseth. He's over your quoting pulp fiction.
Speaker 2: You know biblical scripture, right have Pete.
Speaker 1: Hegseth made national headlines on April second for firing General
Speaker 1: Randy George, the Army's chief of staff, but on the
Speaker 1: same day, Hexith removed William Green, who've served on that
Speaker 1: post since twenty twenty three. Traditionally, a person serves as
Speaker 1: Army Chief of Chaplains for a four year term. No
Speaker 1: reason was given publicly for his dismissal. Insane Green's unusual
Speaker 1: dismissal came amid a shape shakeup talp army brass deployed
Speaker 1: by Hegsath and avowed Christian nationalist who believes in America's
Speaker 1: Warren Iran is sanctioned by God and the fake fake scripture. Right,
Speaker 1: I recite based upon you know, literal pulp face like camp,
Speaker 1: you know Hollywood stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I think it's interesting. As you're mentioning. He
Speaker 2: goes from magic to religion and then he talks about
Speaker 2: how the vast majority of humans are incapable, unwilling to
Speaker 2: pursue or endure metaphysics, So clearly he's coming from a
Speaker 2: metaphysical magical standpoint. He's like, look, these people don't even
Speaker 2: understand the metaphysical aspects of their religions or anything, so
Speaker 2: we can use the literal terms and affect change on
Speaker 2: them in a metaphysical way and they won't even realize it.
Speaker 2: So again, this is Trump, right, I'm the master Magician. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the guy who's dressing. The guy who's dressing is the
Speaker 2: magician Tarot card. And everybody says, it's Jesus, that guy
Speaker 2: was dressing up as like the magician.
Speaker 1: Dude, he sure was crazy, weird hand gestures, all that stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean we know that the religion aspect
Speaker 2: of this is going on. I wonder if there's anything
Speaker 2: in here that kind of points to what we see today.
Speaker 2: As you talked about with the army chaplain, he would
Speaker 2: probably be in there. Reinforces agenda chaplains or commissioned as
Speaker 2: uniformed officers and are dependent for both retention and promotion
Speaker 2: on their secular commander's evaluations. Those who find that they
Speaker 2: cannot reconcile combat missions in order, so that is kind
Speaker 2: of important. Maybe he fired them because he couldn't reconcile
Speaker 2: the combat missions that they're going into. Because this talks
Speaker 2: about how soldiers that they're religious. We have to convince
Speaker 2: soldiers that their religious faith should not stand in the
Speaker 2: way of killing other humans. To reassure soldiers that God
Speaker 2: is on their side in a war, which is funny
Speaker 2: because pete Hegseth recently, even if it is against other
Speaker 2: humans professing faith in the same God. And though these
Speaker 2: first which is crazy, And though these first two missions
Speaker 2: to minimize or dispel soldiers fear and death in combat,
Speaker 2: and then ensure that soldiers' families do not compromise the
Speaker 2: first three missions.
Speaker 3: That's the four tier way.
Speaker 2: To get religion and not get in the way of
Speaker 2: these military officers. Wow, well, I love that they use
Speaker 2: God to get them to go do it, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean?
Speaker 1: That's all right, I mean, that's part of the scio though, right,
Speaker 1: that's it. I mean, it's really like a Christian is
Speaker 1: supposed to be a peaceful religion, turn the other cheek
Speaker 1: and the prince of peace, and it's like no, this
Speaker 1: is God's will go kill exactly.
Speaker 2: Well, it's so pertinent page one thirty one, it's so
Speaker 2: pertinent to what we're talking about what's going on now.
Speaker 2: It talks about US army has removed its own religion
Speaker 2: blinders as discussed above, and it will be in a
Speaker 2: position to objectively and accurately use the religion psicon in
Speaker 2: mind war campaigns. It talks about historically religion remains today
Speaker 2: a powerful force and motivating of humans in PW violence.
Speaker 2: Watch this, dude, this is crazy. As this book goes
Speaker 2: in the press of twenty sixteen, America's politically pronounced enemy
Speaker 2: of convenience is Judeo christianities principal competitor Islam. So he's
Speaker 2: saying we can use mind wars if we just get
Speaker 2: rid of the separation of religion and armies essentially and
Speaker 2: utilize it for our mind work campaign. And then he
Speaker 2: literally mentions the two main characters here in our current
Speaker 2: war that we have in current events.
Speaker 1: So it's happening. Yeah, this has been implemented. It's off
Speaker 1: the charts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it says here historically this new enemy was needed
Speaker 2: and chosen when the Soviet Union and its warsaw packed
Speaker 2: allies collapsed and Communism was no longer plausible as a
Speaker 2: masses inflaming threat. So we had to create this radical
Speaker 2: Islam because the Soviet Union fell.
Speaker 1: Then he writes to test this, simply, look for any
Speaker 1: mention of Islamic terrorism prior to the fall of the
Speaker 1: Berlin Wall in nineteen eighty nine. There is none, no
Speaker 1: telling us they're all terrorists and the real terrorists are us.
Speaker 2: And look at in Israel, look into Operation Cyclone. That's
Speaker 2: where we went, and that's where the mujah Haden got trained.
Speaker 2: Where we went over there and Osama bin Laden got
Speaker 2: picked his family and radicalized him and then utilized him
Speaker 2: later for Afghanistan. In Iraq, this is just Iraq was
Speaker 2: a continuation of the Operation Cyclone in the eighties. Whenever
Speaker 2: we used the Iraqi, Iranians or Iraqians to go against
Speaker 2: the Soviets and whoop their ass in the eighties, that
Speaker 2: was us that, you know, propped them up in the
Speaker 2: first place, and then we use them later as terrorists.
Speaker 1: It's just shocking.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's clear.
Speaker 2: It talks about sex after that. We can skip over
Speaker 2: that if you want. It just kind of talks about
Speaker 2: uh pat.
Speaker 1: To'll probably just use it again, you know, yeah, just more,
Speaker 1: you know, sexual degenerousy. What does he mean by aristos
Speaker 1: and forgot? I think you mentioned that last year.
Speaker 2: Aristos that's what they want to achieve, and that's this idea,
Speaker 2: and you know, and he explains it more. I feel
Speaker 2: like in the very beginning here he actually defines it.
Speaker 2: Uh so, let me find the definition because in the
Speaker 2: beginning he kind of defined some of these terms. But
Speaker 2: it might be easier if you search aristos you're on
Speaker 2: a computer, I am, But yeah, it's a Greek where
Speaker 2: for finding.
Speaker 3: A happy.
Speaker 1: An aristocrat. I don't think that's what he means.
Speaker 3: No, that's not Yeah, that's not what he means.
Speaker 2: I think as we go, because he talks about it
Speaker 2: in the next book as well, what aristos is at
Speaker 2: some point, so he mentions it a lot.
Speaker 1: So it phase two achievement of the Aristos.
Speaker 2: Here we go. John Fowls The Aristose nineteen sixty four
Speaker 2: aristoes the best for a given situation. Wow, what a
Speaker 2: great vague. It's the best for a given situation. Now,
Speaker 2: any given situation could have any degrees of a best,
Speaker 2: and that could be terrible, you know, it could be hellish.
Speaker 2: That's just a very vague, vague term if you really
Speaker 2: think about it.
Speaker 1: Right, it's just his his new terminalology for the best.
Speaker 2: It's aristos so here on one thirty seven. I think
Speaker 2: this is curious. Governments call them patriots or freedom fighters
Speaker 2: if they approve of them in terrorists or insurgents if
Speaker 2: they don't. And so I just think that's super pertinent
Speaker 2: to what we see all the time. He goes into Vietnam,
Speaker 2: he goes into.
Speaker 3: Evolution of the metaphors branch Chi tai chi.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's Lansdale and Prudy there they are. Yeah, he
Speaker 1: just this is what I was telling you about. Lansdale,
Speaker 1: uw legend, a man of mystery during the Huck rebellion
Speaker 1: creative propaganda campaign mag say say that is the let's
Speaker 1: see Doulas created the Saigon military Mission. Lansdell's efforts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I never heard of Lansdale before today, whenever you're
Speaker 2: talking about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's us on cism chilter. See, I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: I wasn'tna worry about.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 3: So he talks about a spoonful of sugar in this.
Speaker 2: It's kind of funny how I don't know he draws
Speaker 2: this line, but he says, a campaign is to stabilize
Speaker 2: the on site situation sufficiently for you to touch down
Speaker 2: and then get a re envision of the situation so
Speaker 2: you can achieve aristos, of course, but if you cannot
Speaker 2: accomplish its mission in a short time span before encountering
Speaker 2: it beginning of sorry, he kind of talks weird in
Speaker 2: that case of the MFB presence should be withdrawn until
Speaker 2: it is preconditioned. But it just talks about in action.
Speaker 2: The MFB team is invisible. Its members materialized without attracting notice.
Speaker 2: They work to adjust the situation without seeming to interfere
Speaker 2: with it, and finally they disappear, just as unobtrusively as
Speaker 2: they arrived. The MFB model is not John Rambo, it
Speaker 2: is Mary Poppins. Just a spoonful of sugar helps the
Speaker 2: medicine go down in the most delightful way. In every
Speaker 2: job that must be done, there's the element of fun.
Speaker 3: You find the fun and snap the job is done,
Speaker 3: and the jobs again.
Speaker 2: So I guess he's just saying that, Yeah, flattery is
Speaker 2: what comes to mind for me, you know, with like
Speaker 2: controlling and manipulating the Masses.
Speaker 1: Says here that Prudy had he was kind of a player,
Speaker 1: like if you remember the JFK movie by Stone, mister
Speaker 1: X was Prudy was based on Prudy.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, suess her.
Speaker 1: Prudy worked with you and Cameron and Lewis Jollian West.
Speaker 1: Those are two huge names in MK ultra. They may
Speaker 1: be in the top names like no names and a
Speaker 1: guy named Jim Montrew. I don't know who that is yet.
Speaker 1: Prudy sent a letter to a Keno in ninety five, crazy,
Speaker 1: so he's in top contact with a Kino as well.
Speaker 1: It's just information I was not aware of.
Speaker 2: Damn this page one fifty five. Who talks about parapolitics.
Speaker 2: It's into what we kind of see more often, I
Speaker 2: guess in our current you know, politics has merged with
Speaker 2: media and media like everything's one thing, right now, you know, conspiracy, politics, media,
Speaker 2: everything's one thing.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: He gets into the symbology of this symbol there, which those.
Speaker 1: It's interesting that even talks parapolitics because it's almost like
Speaker 1: the alternate media has become parapolitical, yes, like it's like
Speaker 1: it so the old media is this kind of mocking
Speaker 1: bird whole thing. But even the people who left the
Speaker 1: old media and come in are like they're like they
Speaker 1: sound like former paraple, Like they sound like Dave mccawan,
Speaker 1: almost like Tucker Carlson and Candae and the character is
Speaker 1: starting to sound reason.
Speaker 2: I think that that's part of the exposure Gates stuff
Speaker 2: that I talk about, where it's like, look, these guys
Speaker 2: are it's they're still the deep state, just because they're
Speaker 2: telling you about the deep state, right. You know, Trump
Speaker 2: said we were you know that Biden was going to
Speaker 2: bring us into World War three, and everybody believed because
Speaker 2: he was willing to say that that no way Trump
Speaker 2: would do it. But no, it's the opposite. That's what
Speaker 2: they're running on. So it's just inversion. Sure, you would
Speaker 2: never think that the guy who's calling something out like
Speaker 2: that would be a part of it, you know what
Speaker 2: I mean, Like that's just the just general consensus that
Speaker 2: you would one would draw right away.
Speaker 1: Trump is definitely in on it. It's a huge act
Speaker 1: of treachery. Like I mean, he said, oh, we are,
Speaker 1: We're going to release everything, and then he's like more
Speaker 1: money for the military, Let's bring on the techniques, the
Speaker 1: you know whatever, you know, conquest, Department of war.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, never ending. He gets into a long He
Speaker 3: gets into a long.
Speaker 2: Diatribe about political structures and how they evolved over time
Speaker 2: from the Dark Ages to Plato or you know, he
Speaker 2: talks about Plato. He talks about the Enlightenment, Protestant Reformation
Speaker 2: and all this shit. But then he finally gets to
Speaker 2: pay of politics architecture. On one sixty three. He references
Speaker 2: this social contract from doctor ragavon Ayer, but he says
Speaker 2: that he writes, we are especially linked to the complacent
Speaker 2: nineteenth century and a tragic aftermath. Words became infected with
Speaker 2: ideologies and political movements on behalf of classes, the lads,
Speaker 2: ruling classes, empires and nations, and as a result we
Speaker 2: have inherited a welter of isms liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism,
Speaker 2: and they proliferate bastard progeny. Noism is a logically complete
Speaker 2: and self consistent system of ideas. Its spurious claim to
Speaker 2: completeness converts it into an ideology which can win followers
Speaker 2: and reconcile them to losses and setbacks. And ideology is
Speaker 2: a form of imposition of Holy writ by a putative
Speaker 2: expert on any doctrinalism. Yeah, they've used this ship all
Speaker 2: the time. It talks about demoralization results from the imposition
Speaker 2: by force or fraud in lieu of inducement through a
Speaker 2: consistent appeal to the unrestricted use of reason. So yeah,
Speaker 2: but we see that ship all the time.
Speaker 3: They're definitely using this.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I think they've they've got usk under control,
Speaker 1: Like they've psycho civilized the population beyond all unders they're
Speaker 1: even their understanding. It's so subliminal. The consent is manufactured.
Speaker 1: The mind war's almost complete. There's probably a few outliers
Speaker 1: out here there.
Speaker 2: It definitely is now. Yeah, and everybody's in there. They're
Speaker 2: echo chambers. You know, You've got everybody's like it's the Jews.
Speaker 2: Everybody's it's this, It's that, It's it's it's gonna come
Speaker 2: to light.
Speaker 1: It's the far right, it's the Left's.
Speaker 2: We're gonna get it.
Speaker 3: We're gonna get a resurgence of the Nazis.
Speaker 2: I think, not literally of the Nazis, but I think
Speaker 2: we're gonna get a resurgence of just from what I've
Speaker 2: been seeing, like this general landscape of a lot of people.
Speaker 2: You know, they're seeing the Zionis thing and they're going
Speaker 2: straight to Hitler's right, and I'm just like, WHOA, back
Speaker 2: up a little, you know, and so they forget about
Speaker 2: like the powers that be that utilize these these religions,
Speaker 2: you know, and utilize these movements, and that are above
Speaker 2: those movements.
Speaker 3: They're not really beholden to any religion or nation.
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's yeah, he key, false flag operations, drum beating,
Speaker 1: degradation of the individual.
Speaker 2: Population, degregation of the individual, that is, that's it.
Speaker 1: And then application like you got to like implement this stuff, right.
Speaker 2: Yep. Yeah, it gets into uh all the provocation, removal, reversal,
Speaker 2: false flag operations, like you said, drum beating, prazy. Yeah,
Speaker 2: So this just gets into all the different ways we
Speaker 2: could do it, population repression. I mean, we could go
Speaker 2: into some of these, but I mean this is stuff
Speaker 2: we see every day. Governmental limitation and removal of civil
Speaker 2: liberties and rights on the grounds that this is necessary
Speaker 2: to fight terrorism does nothing to deter terrorists, but it
Speaker 2: will both aggravate the populace towards the scapegoat and discourage
Speaker 2: protests against the PW promotion. So they go towards the scapegoat, right,
Speaker 2: And that's why I see with Epstein, like they're using
Speaker 2: him as a scapegoat as they enact this, you know,
Speaker 2: and then they use Iran as the escapegoat to Epstein,
Speaker 2: when in reality, all these escapegoats to what Look at
Speaker 2: the flock cameras of the drone systems they're being built.
Speaker 2: I mean, my neighborhood right now is wanting to put
Speaker 2: a bunch of drones and start using it. We already
Speaker 2: have flock cameras, so they're going to connect to each
Speaker 2: other with this Palanteer database system. It's everywhere. Nobody's paying attention.
Speaker 2: It's in your town right now. I guarantee it. If
Speaker 2: it's not, then it's ten minutes away in the next
Speaker 2: town over, I promise. So that's where we're at. It's
Speaker 2: all over. And every time we're in a war, there's
Speaker 2: always a crackdown on civil liberties, and it's always, you know,
Speaker 2: will divert you to the scapegoat as we crack down
Speaker 2: on you.
Speaker 3: Diagnosis of disease.
Speaker 2: I have a feeling that that's about a mental disease
Speaker 2: of some sort. The disease right.
Speaker 1: Look at this. They brought in a freaking neuroscientist to
Speaker 1: do the afterword. Yeah, Alliam Henry Anderson sun Su references
Speaker 1: like that just shows how much behavior of psychology is
Speaker 1: important in neuroscience. Is like.
Speaker 2: Wow, so check this out. Prescription for the cure the
Speaker 2: aristos So it says that, you know, obviously they want
Speaker 2: to achieve this. They want to achieve long, short, and
Speaker 2: medium range forecasting of you know, people's social, political, economic forecasting.
Speaker 3: And then whenever they get.
Speaker 2: A stabilizing and they're fully stabilized, it is the purpose
Speaker 2: of the MW campaign to change them in a such
Speaker 2: a way to eliminate the threat of PW and ensure
Speaker 2: a stable, constructive, and endurable environment. The word piece is
Speaker 2: intentionally not used because it may be necessary to continue
Speaker 2: the formal state of modern warfare or mind warfare significantly
Speaker 2: past the initial elimination of violence into correction of the
Speaker 2: imbalances that could otherwise lead to its return.
Speaker 3: So formal mind war victory is.
Speaker 2: Declared when the situation location can be left to function
Speaker 2: completely without it. I don't think that ever really happens,
Speaker 2: but that's the idea that would be aristose. You still
Speaker 2: get mind war so it never ends. It talks about
Speaker 2: time and space, different dimensions and shit, yeah, he gets
Speaker 2: he gets into everything.
Speaker 3: But what does this neuroscientists have to say we could
Speaker 3: get to that.
Speaker 1: Good to Anderson at the end, he just says that
Speaker 1: this is a valid at you know, addition to what
Speaker 1: the studies Wow tuur of the horizonal of the information
Speaker 1: environment as they relate to national security affairs. Mind where
Speaker 1: is an innovative, trenchant and courageous work. The supreme pinnacle
Speaker 1: of the art of war is to win without fighting,
Speaker 1: or persuade the enemy of your superior perspective such you'd
Speaker 1: wish to join you. That is the goal of mind work.
Speaker 1: To make the wisdom of sunsu operational. Wow, that's a quote.
Speaker 2: It is a blue sky thinking. It retains a practical core.
Speaker 2: It contains an essential optimism in a field where such
Speaker 2: perspective is rare. He's like, man, yeah, blue sky thinking,
Speaker 2: because it probably won't go because the thought, I think
Speaker 2: it comes down to the whole idea of like, you
Speaker 2: can't do it the way that he's laying it out,
Speaker 2: Like you'd have to have such valor, such a virtue
Speaker 2: as you're enacting these in order to keep a actual peaceful,
Speaker 2: happy utopia. That's not gonna happen, you know, because most
Speaker 2: people really just want the power that comes with that control,
Speaker 2: and I think he understands that, Yeah, you're not gonna
Speaker 2: get that with Whenever people have this technology, they're gonna
Speaker 2: they're gonna act absolutely, you know, with that power.
Speaker 1: Yeh, that's amazing.
Speaker 2: So Fine Far. Here on the back, there's a back
Speaker 2: of the book read that was going to give you
Speaker 2: just for like, you know, we we could stop here
Speaker 2: soon and.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's probably good. We're almost at ninety minutes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and we can continue like on the last two
Speaker 2: books next time and just sure put them together and
Speaker 2: do a three part.
Speaker 1: We had two hundred and fifty live listeners. Thanks for listening, everybody.
Speaker 1: Check out Andrew's six G podcast. Is there anything you'd
Speaker 1: like to add?
Speaker 2: Shout out everybody. I'll just leave everybody with this the
Speaker 2: back of the book, you know, excerpt.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Fine Far is the third volume in the series, which
Speaker 2: began with Mind War in twenty thirteen and continued with
Speaker 2: Mindstar in twenty sixteen. The first book introduced a practical
Speaker 2: technology for reducing, if not completely eliminating, the scourge of
Speaker 2: physical warfare afflicting humanity by neutralizing violent, irrational rationality in
Speaker 2: the human subconscious, and then it says mind work concrets
Speaker 2: exclusively on the physical machinery of the human brain. Mindstar
Speaker 2: adds the missing element of metaphysical identity, what humans until
Speaker 2: now have only vaguely sensed as the soul. Now this
Speaker 2: genius at the core of every sentient being is brought
Speaker 2: into full illumination and the definition as the mind Star.
Speaker 2: And finally, find Far completes this evolutionary adventure by superseding
Speaker 2: old static three dimensional analyzes and planning the fourth dimensional
Speaker 2: mind fourth dimension that's what people talk about with dissension.
Speaker 2: We're heading to the fourth dimension, that's what he calls it. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he's the fourth dimensional mind wore dynamic of Fine Far,
Speaker 2: changing the future from reactive to active and adding the
Speaker 2: fifth dimension of individual creative perspective enabled by Mindstar. But
Speaker 2: in this it talks about thought crime, tenacity, It talks
Speaker 2: about kinds of shit.
Speaker 3: So it's gonna be a fun book. It's not what
Speaker 3: you know.
Speaker 2: It sounds all oooh, it's gonna be great, but yeah
Speaker 2: it's not. You know, it's very funny, how inverted all
Speaker 2: this is.
Speaker 1: Did you know that Aquina worked at Fort Wahoocha?
Speaker 2: No ship.
Speaker 1: In this capacity. A Quina was sent to the State
Speaker 1: Department Foreign Service Institute and the Defense Institute Agent Intelligence
Speaker 1: Agency for the attache qualification completed the Military Intelligence Officer
Speaker 1: Advanced Course at Fort Wahoucha.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: I mean it's all right there in the open. It
Speaker 2: is pet hexad like flew there the day that Charlie Kurk,
Speaker 2: like the week of and then the day that that
Speaker 2: Tennessee factory that makes bombs, which, by the way, yep,
Speaker 2: right whenever this happened, I was like, dude, it probably
Speaker 2: was that mic and then that bomb that place blew up,
Speaker 2: and I was like, it has to be, dude, especially
Speaker 2: what it.
Speaker 1: Was meant to be a mic. That's the whole thing.
Speaker 1: It's not a min you had two microphones? Guys, why
Speaker 1: do you Why do you he's speaking on a mic?
Speaker 1: What does he need something?
Speaker 2: Yep? It's insane, shooku.
Speaker 1: And that's like the whole thing about like Candas's investigation
Speaker 1: is like that was a very sense when they blew
Speaker 1: up when she mentioned Fort Wajuca, like that was like
Speaker 1: the attacks on her became very intense, Like he did
Speaker 1: not want not a lot of people knew that for it,
Speaker 1: they know, Brad.
Speaker 3: I never heard about it.
Speaker 2: And Keeth Hagsett flew to or from it the day
Speaker 2: that that Tennessee place blew up, and he did a
Speaker 2: slow flyover over the plant that blew up. That makes
Speaker 2: us wow, that's somebody's research onto his plane. I forgot
Speaker 2: what tag number it has, and they tracked it that
Speaker 2: day and it made a slow flyover over Tennessee the
Speaker 2: day it blew up, going to or coming from Wachuka.
Speaker 1: That's incredible. Was it Baron Baron Coleman? Do you know
Speaker 1: his name?
Speaker 2: He was just on a Where was he? I think
Speaker 2: he was on tienfour recently? Stup Peters was talking about it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Stup Peters talked about it.
Speaker 1: Baron Coleman did a lot of work on these like
Speaker 1: tag numbers, and like there's a lot of these people
Speaker 1: in the Trump administration were doing strange stuff around the time.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not that long ago that Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: was killed. It was only September tenth.
Speaker 2: No, it was the turning point for everything, right, the
Speaker 2: pivot point, and that was what it was meant to be.
Speaker 2: After that, we go to Iram, we get this religious war,
Speaker 2: we get the rise of Christian nationalism, so we can
Speaker 2: come to a head with this AI governance after this
Speaker 2: major war conflict.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's where I think we're headed. I think
Speaker 3: that's the endgame.
Speaker 2: And by the way, I don't know if I talk
Speaker 2: to you about this, but whenever Charlie Kirk died, there
Speaker 2: was a book that came out the day before. It
Speaker 2: was called The Shooting of Charlie Kirk by Anastasia J. Casey.
Speaker 2: And that book was fake because I looked for the author.
Speaker 2: I looked for the book. It's just not real. It
Speaker 2: came out the day before he died, I think, because
Speaker 2: it was nine ninety nine. If you do twenty twenty
Speaker 2: five together, point being Anastasia J. Casey. If you read
Speaker 2: James Shelby Downard's work, when he's talking about the killing
Speaker 2: of jfk he talks about how names have meanings like
Speaker 2: Kennedy means wounded head and Gaelic and he was Irish,
Speaker 2: and so that's important, right, So if you extrapolate that
Speaker 2: and go to Charlie Kirk's killing, Annastasia J. Casey. Anastasia
Speaker 2: is a Christian martyr. Jay is one of the pillars
Speaker 2: in Freemasonry, and it represents he establishes, and then casey
Speaker 2: means a brave watchful order. So the Christian martyr establishes
Speaker 2: a brave new watchful order. When he died, Cash Bettel
Speaker 2: said we have the watch now after he said I'll
Speaker 2: see you in Valhalla. Almost, I just think all this
Speaker 2: is kind of weird, but it's connected.
Speaker 1: Its swidlight language. It's very weird as well asn't Jack
Speaker 1: Chin right? So that j could stand for the Masonic.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Jack yep, it means he establishes yep. And
Speaker 2: so when you put all that together, it's so clear.
Speaker 2: And then even Charlie Kirk it means Freeman's Church. The
Speaker 2: last man to ask him a question was Hunter Kozak,
Speaker 2: which his name literally translates to the hunter of the Freeman.
Speaker 2: You can't make this ship up, dude, I mean, come on,
Speaker 2: there's something to that. So it's yeah, it's really wild.
Speaker 2: That was my little deep dive structure event.
Speaker 1: It's like the jfk assassinations, the JFKSSS Nation of our Time.
Speaker 3: I think that's was the plan. I think that was
Speaker 3: the whole point of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it's a decapitation strike, like the guy was
Speaker 1: leadership potential for a long period of time senator or
Speaker 1: something like he was going to be around. He was
Speaker 1: well known, wealthy.
Speaker 2: Smart, possibly going to be president. We could utilize him
Speaker 2: because he just talked it out about Israel right before
Speaker 2: he died, and now we can use that to turn
Speaker 2: to get Yeah. I think that's people were finding out
Speaker 2: about Israel and the choke hold they have on our country,
Speaker 2: not that it's not real, but they're finding out inorganically,
Speaker 2: and I think that that's important to know and realize.
Speaker 1: Right, where can people find your stuff? Andrew? They can
Speaker 1: find you six to you podcasts, and where can they
Speaker 1: find you if they want to reach out to your contact?
Speaker 2: Sixty Agenda everywhere you get your podcast YouTube, We go
Speaker 2: live all the time. Uh chep his Patreon around and
Speaker 2: if you want to reach out, sixty Agenda pod at
Speaker 2: gmail dot com.
Speaker 1: Otherwise hugenot a gmail dot com until next time. This
Speaker 1: week was a Kino's mind were and a lot of
Speaker 1: crazy references, like a lot of stuff in here. I
Speaker 1: didn't know Prudy and then all these other of things.
Speaker 1: The Lansdale it kind of actually reminds me of Crawley.
Speaker 1: He had this thing called the Gnostic Mass, and he
Speaker 1: like appreciated all these people in history. It's almost like
Speaker 1: a Knot's listing that stuff out too here as well.
Speaker 1: But thanks everybody for listening to under Live listeners and
Speaker 1: until next time, thanks so much