Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twenty fifth
Speaker 2: of February. You're our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well, last
Speaker 2: night we had the State of the Disunion, and we're
Speaker 2: going to take a quick look at that. There wasn't
Speaker 2: much in terms of substance, a lot of things that
Speaker 2: people thought were going to be covered. We're gearing up
Speaker 2: for a war with Iran, but we're not going to
Speaker 2: talk about that too much. So we're going to look
Speaker 2: at the economy, the egonomics of Trump, the war, the
Speaker 2: ego politics. Even the Pentagon is having concerns about this
Speaker 2: war in Iran. They said, you know, we're low on
Speaker 2: allies and ammunition and this could be a very long fight.
Speaker 2: And then there's some new revelations about the Epstein files.
Speaker 2: It turns out that there's a missing fifty three pages
Speaker 2: and these involve three out of four interviews with a
Speaker 2: woman who claims that she was raped by Trump as
Speaker 2: a teenager, and the FBI took it seriously enough to
Speaker 2: do four interviews. Three of those interviews are missing, and
Speaker 2: Jeral Clinty is going to be joining us a new
Speaker 2: trends journal today on Wednesday. We're going to be talking
Speaker 2: about Trump and tariffs, and of course what's going to
Speaker 2: happen in war. We'll be right back. Well, let's take
Speaker 2: a look at the State of the Disunion. The anticipation
Speaker 2: about it was much more interesting than the actual event.
Speaker 2: Zero Hedge was saying, well, this is going to be
Speaker 2: it could be a lot of fireworks here. He may
Speaker 2: go after the Supreme Court. They're going to be just
Speaker 2: setting a few feet away from him, and Obama did
Speaker 2: that at one point in time in a State of
Speaker 2: the Union address. He is very upset with recent Supreme
Speaker 2: Court opinion. That didn't happen. You had seventy two Democrats
Speaker 2: who decided to boycott the address last night. We're not
Speaker 2: going to be there. Everybody knew it was going to
Speaker 2: be a very long speech. One of the longest speeches that
Speaker 2: a present's ever given to a joint session was last
Speaker 2: year when it was not a State of the Union yet,
Speaker 2: but it was a speech and it was about an
Speaker 2: hour and forty minutes long. I didn't even bother to
Speaker 2: look how long the sun was, but it was pretty long,
Speaker 2: a lot of the use of the term winning in
Speaker 2: case you buy that kind of stuff. But yeah, it
Speaker 2: was a long padded Faulse resume basically was what it was.
Speaker 2: Very little discussion about the issues that people thought were
Speaker 2: going to be there, like, for example, Iran. Everybody knows
Speaker 2: that he's gearing up, that war is imminent with Iran.
Speaker 2: No talk about that. Really, it's kind of a little
Speaker 2: of an aside. And so some of the things that
Speaker 2: Zero Hedge thought that he might talk about. They said, well,
Speaker 2: he reportedly is planning to outline an unconventional idea for
Speaker 2: personal and corporate tax cuts that he could implement, of
Speaker 2: course without Congress. Like I said before, we have the
Speaker 2: legislative branch, the judicial branch, and now we have a
Speaker 2: newly renamed emergency branch. That's what government has become. And
Speaker 2: so it's going to be what emergency orders is it
Speaker 2: going to do? But there was nothing about that about
Speaker 2: a new idea for personal and corporate tax cuts. Trump
Speaker 2: has previously floated rebate checks for Americans that would be
Speaker 2: funded by tariff revenue. What tariff revenue? As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, you just had FedEx. It's the first company
Speaker 2: to file a lawsuit. You see, the government takes your
Speaker 2: money and you got a sue to get it back.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like civil what's that forfeiture? Isn't it
Speaker 2: where they steal your car or your home or your cash.
Speaker 2: They say it's a civil procedure. It's not a criminal procedure.
Speaker 2: You weren't found guilty of any crime. You weren't even
Speaker 2: charge of the crime. But they stole your stuff anyway.
Speaker 2: And because they call it a civil procedure, because it's
Speaker 2: based on rules coming from the emergency branch of government,
Speaker 2: then you have to sue them to get your property back.
Speaker 2: And that's what it is now. With the people who
Speaker 2: have paid these teriffs, they got a suit to get
Speaker 2: it back. Federal Express had said earlier this summer they
Speaker 2: were facing a billion dollar charge arge because of Trump's terraces,
Speaker 2: which amounted to sixteen percent of their income. And so
Speaker 2: it's a big deal, and they were the first ones
Speaker 2: out of the gate to come back and ask for
Speaker 2: their money back in a lawsuit. Trump could emphasize said
Speaker 2: zero hedge plans that his administration has to lower housing costs,
Speaker 2: you know, things like as they put it, barring institutional
Speaker 2: investors from snapping up single family homes. See our head,
Speaker 2: John and Hill better than that I had David Bonson
Speaker 2: On Andy explained, you know, here's what the research has shown.
Speaker 2: It's actually a very very small footprint in the marketplace
Speaker 2: in terms of institutional investment, and in the markets that
Speaker 2: they invested in. Those were not the markets that didn't
Speaker 2: have really an effect anyway in those markets. So that
Speaker 2: is something that presents really serious principal issues. You know,
Speaker 2: where do we if we established this as a precedent,
Speaker 2: where could this go? It's a very dangerous, very stupid idea.
Speaker 2: First of all, there's no pragmatic benefit to it. Secondly,
Speaker 2: it such yet another Trump precedent that destroys the rule
Speaker 2: of law and the constitution anyway. That was not mentioned
Speaker 2: either in the State of the Disunion. Scathing dressing down
Speaker 2: of the justices. Well, that didn't happen either. As Reason
Speaker 2: pointed out, the sixth year of presidents has been notoriously
Speaker 2: bad for them. For Nixon, it's bad for Reagan. This
Speaker 2: when Iran Contra broke. It's bad for Bill Clinton. That
Speaker 2: was when the Monica Lewinsky thing happened, and it was
Speaker 2: basically had happened just before he gave his State of
Speaker 2: the Union number six in a six year, i should say.
Speaker 2: And his response to that was just to ignore it,
Speaker 2: just to talk right past it, not even mention it. Right,
Speaker 2: he just had all this stuff. You know, we had
Speaker 2: the press conference. He's standing right next to Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2: He says, well, I did not have sex with that
Speaker 2: woman Minchael Lewinsky.
Speaker 3: Yeah it was, And of course ken Starr let him off.
Speaker 2: Ken Starr let off Jeffrey Epstein as well, along with
Speaker 2: Alan Dershowitz and Trump's alex Acosta. So again, it's amazing
Speaker 2: to me how similar the Clinton's and the Trumps are
Speaker 2: really when you take a look at it.
Speaker 3: It's amazing.
Speaker 2: As they say, history doesn't repeat, but it certainly does
Speaker 2: rhyme in a very creepy way, very creepy way. So
Speaker 2: Trump was likely to address a rounder in a speech,
Speaker 2: but very very little about that. No case being made
Speaker 2: for the war there, and so you had, you know,
Speaker 2: the transcript is there if you want to read it,
Speaker 2: but listen to this cheerleading coming.
Speaker 3: From bright Bar.
Speaker 2: I went to Breitbart and went to CNN because I
Speaker 2: want to getting stud different bookends to see what people
Speaker 2: were saying about this thing. Frankly, folks, I'm not gonna
Speaker 2: watch two hours of Trump rambling and lying and patting
Speaker 2: himself on the back, not for anything. I'll take a
Speaker 2: look at the transcripts, but you know that's bad enough.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna waste my life that way too short anyway, Breitbart,
Speaker 2: this is the way they cap it up. Screaming headlines
Speaker 2: that went on for a couple of pages. Trump hails
Speaker 2: the Golden Age. USA is bigger, better, richer, and stronger
Speaker 2: than ever before. Do you believe that got a bridge
Speaker 2: for you? Trump traps the Dems. They sit for the
Speaker 2: pledge to protect American citizens. They fell for it. They
Speaker 2: didn't stand up and clap you know whatever. The blues
Speaker 2: bummer Dems stand for nothing. These people are crazy. Trump
Speaker 2: fires back at Omar and talib As they down Somali pirates,
Speaker 2: he says, and then the President touts successes border inflation, fentanyl.
Speaker 2: We stopped all that fentanyl coming from Canada. How about that?
Speaker 2: Isn't that great? I mean that Canada was just flooding
Speaker 2: US with fentanyl.
Speaker 3: We stopped it right there.
Speaker 2: And so the murder rate, jobs growth for America, and
Speaker 2: the end of dei and then the president accuses the Democrats,
Speaker 2: you caused that problem. Potus faults Dems for the affordability crisis.
Speaker 2: Again an inflated resume matched along with basically the Pam
Speaker 2: Bondi nastiness. Instead of defending yourself, you go on the
Speaker 2: war path, you go on offense, and you get as
Speaker 2: offensive as possible. So I call the dish union the
Speaker 2: state of the disunion. That is there, so again lies
Speaker 2: and attacks. That is a strategy coming down from the top.
Speaker 2: And so CNN has their sound bites here a turnaround
Speaker 2: for the ages. We're winning too much. Now we are
Speaker 2: the hottest country anywhere in the world, be hottest. And
Speaker 2: the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of our glorious American independence. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's really sad when you put in historical perspective to
Speaker 2: see where we are after two hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 2: Not much of American principles left is there. And of
Speaker 2: course they put all that stuff up in the foreground
Speaker 2: of Trump in the background saying that their comments Trump
Speaker 2: is on the defense in multiple fronts. But you know,
Speaker 2: like Pambondi or Warpeate, you change the defense to war.
Speaker 2: The state of the Union address was his chance to
Speaker 2: recast as unpoppular or mass deportation, effort to explain why
Speaker 2: US warships are massing for military action against Iran, to
Speaker 2: stare down the Supreme Court justices who last week rejected
Speaker 2: his unprecedented use of tariffs. Then there were the Epstein
Speaker 2: survivors in the House chamber to push for more transparency.
Speaker 2: None of that happened, really, right, transparency didn't happen either.
Speaker 2: But then you've got all the celebrations that they always
Speaker 2: do with these events. You've got the US men's hockey
Speaker 2: team there, You've got multiple medal of honor and two
Speaker 2: Purple Hearts, and a legion of Merit and medical freedom
Speaker 2: so people can stand up and plod for them. And
Speaker 2: he had Erica Kirk there. There was verbal war with Democrats,
Speaker 2: some of whom shouted or walked out of the chamber
Speaker 2: so Trump could call them crazy. This is the insanity
Speaker 2: of this two party war system. So maybe the most
Speaker 2: telling problem for Trump was the fact that the general
Speaker 2: appath of people. Seriously, do you really want to hear
Speaker 2: this guy drone on and on for two hours?
Speaker 3: Who wants that?
Speaker 2: Right? I think maybe that's the biggest tell the people
Speaker 2: have had enough. You know, you hear him drowne about
Speaker 2: all his imaginary accomplishments. The only case that he made
Speaker 2: for war with Iran was basically a replay of the
Speaker 2: BB bomb bs that we've heard now for thirty years.
Speaker 3: And he did that.
Speaker 2: Even as in the afternoon you had Caroline Lovett was asked.
Speaker 2: They said, you know, Trump has said, first of all
Speaker 2: that he completely obliterated Iran's nuclear program just a you know,
Speaker 2: short period of time ago, and now he's saying we've
Speaker 2: got to go back and have a war with Iran
Speaker 2: because they've got a nuclear war program. Here's what she
Speaker 2: had to say.
Speaker 4: Ron mentioned offer the questions telling the success.
Speaker 5: That's one makes a less to cut after.
Speaker 2: That was that a lot of near size beerated.
Speaker 5: You heard those people.
Speaker 2: How do you square those two statements are saying.
Speaker 4: No, the President's initial statement, and the President reiterated that
Speaker 4: statement last night on true social that Operation Midnight Hammer
Speaker 4: was an overwhelmingly successful mission that did in fact obliterate
Speaker 4: Iran's nuclear facilities. That is not just verified by the
Speaker 4: President of the United States, but also the International Atomic
Speaker 4: Energy Commission as well. That does not mean that Iran
Speaker 4: may never try again to establish a nuclear program directly
Speaker 4: threatened the United States is abroad, and that's what the
Speaker 4: President wants to ensure can never happen again. And just
Speaker 4: one more note, but with respect to Iran, before I
Speaker 4: run into my morning meeting. President Trump's first option is
Speaker 4: always diplomacy, but as he has shown, he is unwilling,
Speaker 4: he is willing to use the lethal force of the
Speaker 4: United States military if necessary. So it's always the president
Speaker 4: is always the final decision maker around here. And I've
Speaker 4: seen a lot of sensationalist reporting over the past day
Speaker 4: that is just completely untrue. And anyone speculating to the
Speaker 4: media hiding behind an anonymous source pretending to know what
Speaker 4: President Trump is thinking or a decision he will make
Speaker 4: with respect to action against Iran, has no idea what
Speaker 4: they're talking about.
Speaker 5: Here.
Speaker 2: We don't need to hide behind anonymous sources. We can
Speaker 2: clearly see what he's doing. You have Steve Whitkoff, who
Speaker 2: is the quote unquote negotiator, goes on with Trump's daughter
Speaker 2: in law, and Fox News goes on with Laura Trump
Speaker 2: and says, I don't know why the Iranians haven't capitulated. Look,
Speaker 2: at all the ships we got ready to attack them,
Speaker 2: and yet they did capitulate. As I pointed out yesterday,
Speaker 2: and I've forgotten the details, didn't write them down, but
Speaker 2: basically what they were saying was, we will surrender our
Speaker 2: enhanced enrichment program of uranium, taking it up to ninety percent,
Speaker 2: and we will give that up, and we will give up
Speaker 2: that part of the program, and we'll even pause our
Speaker 2: civilian program where we take it up to a sixty
Speaker 2: percent level, and we will pause that for a couple
Speaker 2: of years. That's their offer. They don't care about this.
Speaker 2: The decision, as many people said, is going to be
Speaker 2: made by Witkoff and Jared Kushner. How do we get
Speaker 2: Jared Kushner deciding to take us to war. I thought
Speaker 2: that was a function of Congress. This guy's not even elected.
Speaker 2: This is like Hillary Clinton deciding she's going to restructure
Speaker 2: our healthcare program back in the nineties. It'scept a lot
Speaker 2: worse than that. Anyway, the two of them are going
Speaker 2: to make this decision, and you know, we pretend that
Speaker 2: we've got these talks with people, and yet you know,
Speaker 2: and Trump has his envoys go in and talk about
Speaker 2: the Ukraine, Russian war. Is Russia going to take that
Speaker 2: seriously when we're giving arms to Ukraine. We're not an
Speaker 2: independent negotiator here, and we're not an independent negotiator there
Speaker 2: in Iran either, And so we're going to talk about
Speaker 2: that coming up. But again you have Trump who goes
Speaker 2: out and says, well, we destroyed their nuclear program. Then
Speaker 2: his chief negotiator, Whitcoff, says, well, I think they're just
Speaker 2: a short period of time away from having nuclear weapons,
Speaker 2: you know, weeks or whatever. And how does that square
Speaker 2: with what Trump said? But of course don't worry, because
Speaker 2: Susan Lovett will lie about everything. That's way what these
Speaker 2: people are. That's why they pick these spokespersons, right. No
Speaker 2: matter what happens, you can hit them with their statements
Speaker 2: recorded statements that are completely contradictory to each other. It
Speaker 2: doesn't even phase them. They just brush it off. These
Speaker 2: people lie for a living. It's disgusting to watch them operate.
Speaker 2: I am so sick and tired of these lying politicians
Speaker 2: both sides. It doesn't matter. It's not just a Republican thing,
Speaker 2: it's a Democrat thing of course obviously as well. They
Speaker 2: all have these press secretaries who lie for them. Even
Speaker 2: when they're in the lie, they don't care. Well, we're
Speaker 2: gonna take a quick break before we do, Fuzzy Matteo
Speaker 2: says George Costanzas. It's not a lie if you believe it.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely true. That's right, that's a good stealth patriot.
Speaker 2: The Democrats put the illegal aliens first, Republicans but Israel first.
Speaker 2: Who's representing me? Nobody, that's right. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: I guess you could say Thomas Massey. I just always
Speaker 2: say this about Ron Paul. You know, Ron Paul was
Speaker 2: not perfect. Thomas Massey is not perfect. I can have
Speaker 2: my disagreements with him, but they are the people who
Speaker 2: represent me in Congress, even if I'm not in their district.
Speaker 3: That's about as close as I can get.
Speaker 2: So we're going to take a quick break, and when
Speaker 2: we come back, we're going to talk about the pedophile privacy.
Speaker 2: You know, the pedophiles get privacy. Isn't that interesting. We
Speaker 2: don't get any privacy, We don't get any security, but
Speaker 2: the Machiavelian industrial complex, it sends us to war over
Speaker 2: and over again. They get their security, not us. We'll
Speaker 2: be right back, Liberty, it's your move.
Speaker 1: And now the David Knight.
Speaker 2: Show, well right, overture says, how many years would we
Speaker 2: have to go back to find a president or Congress
Speaker 2: that didn't lie to the people. Maybe George Washington at
Speaker 2: the beginning of his term, I don't know. The Congress
Speaker 2: immediately ignored the provision about limiting the number of people
Speaker 2: that would be represented by those in Congress. I mean,
Speaker 2: they immediately went against their constitution. But of course I
Speaker 2: think George Washington has farewell addressed and other issues like that.
Speaker 2: I don't think he betrayed the principles of the Constitution.
Speaker 2: You know, even Thomas Jefferson with the Louisiana purchase, essentially
Speaker 2: betrayed the Constitution in any different and very important way.
Speaker 2: It was pragmamatic, and it was probably worked out for
Speaker 2: the best to buy from the French government when they
Speaker 2: needed the cash to buy half of what is now
Speaker 2: continentally the United States. But there wasn't any congressional authority,
Speaker 2: There wasn't any constitutional authority for that, and he acknowledged that.
Speaker 2: So I don't know. But principles are principles, aren't they.
Speaker 2: And yet when we look at this pedophile issue that
Speaker 2: is here now protecting the pedophiles. There's the as they're
Speaker 2: looking at the midterms coming up. The Republicans aren't doing
Speaker 2: anything at all in Congress to try to rehabilitate their
Speaker 2: image either. And we have these the Epstein File Transparency
Speaker 2: Act e FTA they call it, because of this act
Speaker 2: that was passed by Congress because of Thomas Massey and Rocanna.
Speaker 2: They numbered all of these pages sequentially, so the page
Speaker 2: numbers will say e f TA one, e f TA two,
Speaker 2: so forth and so on sequentially. That meant that there's
Speaker 2: somebody noticed there's a big gap of fifty three pages
Speaker 2: missing as a matter of fact, that somebody was MPR.
Speaker 2: This is revenge best served cold. I guess Trump cut
Speaker 2: their funding, and I'm all for cutting the funding of MPR.
Speaker 2: By the way, we should not have any government media.
Speaker 2: These people are capable of doing some investigative journalism anyway.
Speaker 3: And so they did that, and.
Speaker 2: They said it's fifty three pages missing, and these things
Speaker 2: are in there sequentially. And there was three out of
Speaker 2: four interviews with a woman. The FBI found her credible
Speaker 2: enough to interview her four times, and she had accused
Speaker 2: Trump of raping her as a teen and so three
Speaker 2: of those four interviews are gone are part of that
Speaker 2: fifty three missing pages. And so they say, well, you
Speaker 2: know what, what is that about? Because they redacted stuff
Speaker 2: as well, why would they take those pages out completely. Well,
Speaker 2: remember that the people in Congress are able to see
Speaker 2: the unredacted documents. So this must have been something damaging
Speaker 2: indeed for the Department of Justice to pull that out.
Speaker 2: And so that is a key thing that was revealed
Speaker 2: in it. It's also kind of interesting. I think the
Speaker 2: dog that did not bark, or I should say, the
Speaker 2: dog that and get shot by Christy Nome. We don't
Speaker 2: have anybody in government anywhere in the Trump administration or
Speaker 2: people like that that are really seeing any kind of punishment.
Speaker 2: We have the former Prime Minister of Norway attempted suicide
Speaker 2: because of what was revealed in the Epstein stuff. He's
Speaker 2: facing criminal charges, and so I guess Donald Trump decided
Speaker 2: that rather than have to attempt suicide because of criminal
Speaker 2: charges brought against him, he would rather commit political suicide
Speaker 2: and make sure this stuff never sees the light of day.
Speaker 3: And so I guess that's where we are. As a
Speaker 3: matter of fact.
Speaker 2: A little interesting aside there, this guy who attempted suicide
Speaker 2: because he's facing criminal charges. Former Prime Minister of Norway.
Speaker 2: After he was Prime Minister of Norway, he also then
Speaker 2: became the chair of the Nobel Peace Prize, which is
Speaker 2: operated out of Norway, but it's not done by the government.
Speaker 2: Note to Trump, that's not the government doesn't due to
Speaker 2: the Nobel Prize. But this was a former government official
Speaker 2: who was the head of the Nobel Peace when Obama
Speaker 2: was given the Nobel Peace Prize in two thousand and nine,
Speaker 2: this is the guy that gave it to him, who
Speaker 2: just attempted suicide because of his connections with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: So that's the big gotcha point by the MAGA people.
Speaker 2: That's all they want to talk about with that. But
Speaker 2: there's also another development that came out, and that was
Speaker 2: research that was done by the UK Telegraph. They're very
Speaker 2: interested in this Epstein stuff in the UK. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, as we point out, there's been big
Speaker 2: consequences in the UK for people connected to Epstein. You
Speaker 2: have Mandelson, who was US ambassador to the US's he
Speaker 2: lost that, he had to get out of his resign
Speaker 2: from politics, lost the ambassadorship and so forth, and the
Speaker 2: fallout from that has affected the guy that got him hired,
Speaker 2: and also so affected the calls for resignation of kuer Starmer,
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister. And so just for having this guy
Speaker 2: who knows Jeffrey Epstein is enough for people to call
Speaker 2: for the resignation of the Prime Minister.
Speaker 3: Whereas here we got the president who.
Speaker 2: Was his best friend for fifteen years and is covering
Speaker 2: up all these files as best that he can and
Speaker 2: the no consequences at all for him. And then take
Speaker 2: a look at the Royal family, and the Royal family
Speaker 2: has had allegations swirling around them for centuries about corruption
Speaker 2: and other issues. I mean, just go back even to
Speaker 2: the Jimmy Saville stuff. Or he had this guy who
Speaker 2: worked for I guess it was a BBC had a
Speaker 2: children's program and it came out that he was a
Speaker 2: horrific pedophile and the BBC started doing an expose on
Speaker 2: him and they shut that down and fired the people
Speaker 2: at the BBC. And he had a lot of connections
Speaker 2: to the Royal family. And yet this is even more
Speaker 2: so with Jeffrey Epstein. So with former Prince Andrew, the
Speaker 2: man formerly known as Prince he gets kicked out, he
Speaker 2: gets thrown out of he gets frog marched out of
Speaker 2: Frogmore Mansion and I think it's where he was at midnight.
Speaker 2: And then later on they arrest him on his birthday,
Speaker 2: and the photograph of his anguished face as he's coming
Speaker 2: or going from the jail. He's facing a long term
Speaker 2: sentence if they apply this to him, and it looks
Speaker 2: like the royal family is going to be just fine
Speaker 2: with that and would probably prefer that. They want to
Speaker 2: try to distance themselves as much as they can from
Speaker 2: Andrew because this is something that could bring down the
Speaker 2: royal family with the way the country is right now.
Speaker 2: And so that picture that went viral of him in Dismay,
Speaker 2: they had some people who said people on social media,
Speaker 2: they put up a viral picture of them framing that
Speaker 2: picture and hanging it in the louver. They said, people
Speaker 2: said you ought to put that in the louver in
Speaker 2: some of the comments said, so we did, And then
Speaker 2: they took a video themselves putting it on the wall
Speaker 2: and the louver and put that on social media. This
Speaker 2: is what's happening in other countries. The dog that didn't
Speaker 2: bark is here in America, and I think it's going
Speaker 2: to Bark. I think this is going to be very
Speaker 2: damaging for Trump in the long term. People care about this.
Speaker 2: This is, as Thomas Massey said, this is bigger than
Speaker 2: Watergate because it has international consequences. In the UK and
Speaker 2: Norway many other places like that. Everybody is paying attention
Speaker 2: to this, and it is something that is dear to
Speaker 2: the heart of people. Nobody likes to see children abused, right,
Speaker 2: and so you have people who are pedophiles frequently are
Speaker 2: killed in prison. Not to believe that Jeffrey Epstein was
Speaker 2: killed but could have been, but not because of those reasons.
Speaker 2: But typically pedophiles don't do too well in prison, even
Speaker 2: fellow prisoners despise them. And so this is something that
Speaker 2: really people have a visceral reaction to this kind of
Speaker 2: stuff and the kind of pictures that are coming out.
Speaker 2: And so the other aspect of this that came out
Speaker 2: was that the Telegraph did some research and they found
Speaker 2: that Epstein had storage sheds, a lot of them and
Speaker 2: places not too far from where he lived, and he
Speaker 2: actually paid a private detective agency to grab a lot
Speaker 2: of his documents and photos and videos and things like
Speaker 2: that and selectively removed stuff that would be damming when
Speaker 2: investigators came to his home and searched. And so there's
Speaker 2: records of him paying them, records of him paying the
Speaker 2: storage shed places, and I mean they were not cheap.
Speaker 2: I looked at it. It's like, you know, three hundred
Speaker 2: dollars a month or three hundred fifty a month, just
Speaker 2: one of them. And so he got these pis, two
Speaker 2: of them that it's a partnership that they had, and
Speaker 2: both of them are former cops, and he hired them
Speaker 2: to take evidence and hide it. And he also hired
Speaker 2: them to find dirt on people that he had abused
Speaker 2: that could possibly testify against him, to blackmail them. Great job,
Speaker 2: former cops. So anyway, that's that was found by the
Speaker 2: UK Telegraph, And of course they pointed out that if
Speaker 2: you don't pay those big fees on a regular basis,
Speaker 2: what happens with storage sheds, Well, they have an auction
Speaker 2: and they get rid of all this stuff. So it's
Speaker 2: spent six years. I guess since anybody paid these fees,
Speaker 2: I would imagine it's been auctioned off. Imagine the surprise
Speaker 2: when somebody opens up some of these boxes. Except I
Speaker 2: don't think that's what happened. I think there's people who
Speaker 2: knew what was going on. I mean, if nothing else
Speaker 2: as private investigators, maybe even the FBI, because the FBI,
Speaker 2: as I've said before, if you want to know what
Speaker 2: it really stands for, it's FEDS who are blocking investigations,
Speaker 2: investigations that could be damaging to politicians. That's the real
Speaker 2: role of the FBI. And Jaggar Hoobert was there to
Speaker 2: block investigations of his friends. It was there to blackmail
Speaker 2: his enemies. And you had multiple presidents Democrat and Republican
Speaker 2: have both Nixon as well as Truman talking about how
Speaker 2: Jaggar Hoover had dirt on everybody and was blackmailing everybody.
Speaker 2: And so it could have been the FBI could have
Speaker 2: got this stuff and put it somewhere else, could have
Speaker 2: been an individual within the FBI. Or it also could
Speaker 2: have been these crooked private investigators. And I call him
Speaker 2: because if you're going to let somebody pay you to
Speaker 2: hide evidence, and then if you're going to go get
Speaker 2: stuff on victims, that's what the emails show. I don't know,
Speaker 2: that's I would call that crooked. What about you? That's
Speaker 2: crooked in my book. But these guys, when you look
Speaker 2: at what they found in the telegraph.
Speaker 3: A lot of people, Oh.
Speaker 2: Well, this is going to be We're going to find
Speaker 2: a lot more evidence. I don't think you're going to
Speaker 2: find anything. I think it's probably somebody who was on
Speaker 2: the inside of the Epstein organization probably got it. Maybe
Speaker 2: they destroyed it, maybe they put it somewhere else, maybe
Speaker 2: they kept it for quote unquote protection against other people.
Speaker 2: But I don't think you're going to find it in
Speaker 2: the storage sheds at this point. And so the pedophiles
Speaker 2: are getting their privacy and Trump is making sure he
Speaker 2: may not care much about your privacy. He likes a
Speaker 2: surveillance state, he wants to have digital ID, he wants
Speaker 2: to have digital currency, he wants to use AI to
Speaker 2: scope out everything about you. But they're not going to
Speaker 2: do any of that stuff. Would it be interesting if
Speaker 2: they were to turn the Epstein files over to an
Speaker 2: AI program to sort this through this stuff, correlate it.
Speaker 2: And because that's one thing that AI is really good at,
Speaker 2: that's what they're going to use it against us for.
Speaker 2: They're going to use it to micromanage and audits of
Speaker 2: their enemies, but they're not going to use it to
Speaker 2: look at the Epstein data. So again the Telegraph looked
Speaker 2: at credit card receipts. They did a little bit of
Speaker 2: detective work themselves. I don't know if they hired X
Speaker 2: cops or not, but they did some detective work. They
Speaker 2: said shows regular storage payments continued until twenty nineteen, the
Speaker 2: year of his death. Search warrants reviewed by The Telegraph
Speaker 2: suggestion US authorities never rated the lockers, raising the possibility
Speaker 2: that they may contain unseen evidence relating to Epstein and
Speaker 2: his associates, including Andrew formerly known as Prince and Lord Mandelsson.
Speaker 2: And because this is coming out of the UK, so
Speaker 2: that's what they're concerned about. But they mentioned at the
Speaker 2: very end, well, you know they auction these things often
Speaker 2: people don't pay them. So that's going to be the
Speaker 2: end of that, essentially the missing papers. However, there's quite
Speaker 2: a story behind that when you look at it. As
Speaker 2: I said, this is all a story about the woman
Speaker 2: told saying that she was raped by Trump as a teenager,
Speaker 2: and the FBI took it seriously enough to do four
Speaker 2: interviews with her, and the transcripts from three of those
Speaker 2: four interviews when she was thirteen or fourteen years old,
Speaker 2: I think that counts as a minor even for people
Speaker 2: like Elan Dershowitz and Megan Kelly.
Speaker 3: Don't you the.
Speaker 2: DOJ appears of illegally withheld FBI interviews and the survivor
Speaker 2: who accused Trump of heinous crimes, said a Democrat politician, Well,
Speaker 2: I guess we just dismissed that because the Democrats said it. No,
Speaker 2: it's true, it's true. So the as MPR did an investigation.
Speaker 2: They found dozens of pages, actually fifty three to be precise,
Speaker 2: that appear to be cataloged by the Justice Department but
Speaker 2: not shared publicly. And that's how they know it is
Speaker 2: because they all have a consecutive number, the Epstein File
Speaker 2: Transparency Act, EFTA one, EFTA two, e FDA three, that
Speaker 2: type of thing. And then afterwards somebody pulled all these things.
Speaker 2: So Garcia is the Democrat who is on the House
Speaker 2: Oversight Committee, he's the ranking member, and he's been looking
Speaker 2: at these files as they let them. They don't allow
Speaker 2: them to take anything with them. It's electronic. They can't
Speaker 2: take pictures, they can't read it into advice, and they
Speaker 2: can't have any staff. No staff can see it. But
Speaker 2: they have four computers set up to look at millions
Speaker 2: of pages. He said, yesterday I reviewed unredacted evidence logs
Speaker 2: of the Department of Justice oversight Democrats can confirm that
Speaker 2: the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with
Speaker 2: the survivor who accused Trump of heinous crimes, and so
Speaker 2: some of the documents that they pointed out were briefly
Speaker 2: taken down but put back online, while others remain hidden.
Speaker 2: And these pages remain hidden again. The FBI interviewed the
Speaker 2: Trump and Epstein accuser four times, according to an FBI
Speaker 2: serial report, and a list of non testifying witness materials
Speaker 2: that Max in the Maxwell case were also released under
Speaker 2: the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Of fifteen documents listed in
Speaker 2: the log of the Maxwell discovery material for this first accuser,
Speaker 2: only seven are in the Epstein Files database. Those missing
Speaker 2: include notes that a company three of the four interviews,
Speaker 2: so she was concerned. Oh, this is the other aspect
Speaker 2: of it. The woman discussed ways that Epstein abused her
Speaker 2: as a girl, and in identifying him to investigators, she
Speaker 2: showed a cropped photo of Epstein. Her attorney said it
Speaker 2: was cropped because she was quote concerned about implicating additional
Speaker 2: individuals and specifically any that were well known due to
Speaker 2: fear of retaliation. The FBI agents noted that it was
Speaker 2: a quote widely distributed photograph of Epstein with Trump, so
Speaker 2: looks like maybe Trump was the well known individual that
Speaker 2: she feared retaliation from, and again part of her testimony
Speaker 2: was that she was raped by him. A second woman
Speaker 2: detailed how Epstein and Maxwell's abuse began while she was
Speaker 2: around thirteen years old attending the interlock In Center for
Speaker 2: the Arts, and described how at one point Epstein took
Speaker 2: her to Trump's Marlago club to meet him. Epstein told
Speaker 2: Trump this is a good one, huh, and twenty Twain
Speaker 2: lawsuit against Epstein's the state Maxwell. The second woman added
Speaker 2: that both men chuckled and she felt uncomfortable. By the time,
Speaker 2: she said, I was too young to really understand why,
Speaker 2: and so that was the first interview of six that
Speaker 2: the FBI conducted. That interview was removed from the DOJ's
Speaker 2: public files sometime after initial publication on January thirtieth, and
Speaker 2: it was republished February the nineteenth. According to document metadata,
Speaker 2: multiple FBI interviews with other people refer to the second
Speaker 2: woman meeting with Trump while she was a minor and
Speaker 2: being abused by Epstein. In one interview, they talked to
Speaker 2: her mother. They interviewed her mother, and the mother recalled hearing.
Speaker 2: She said, well, I heard that there's a prince and
Speaker 2: that Donald Trump visited Epstein's house. She said, it made
Speaker 2: me think, if those guys are there, how could Epstein
Speaker 2: be a criminal? Amazing? So she thought, well, okay, it's
Speaker 2: okay to go to Jeffrey Epstein's house because he has
Speaker 2: visitors like Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. That's kind of
Speaker 2: the reverse thinking, isn't it. It's tragic, but that's the
Speaker 2: kind of thinking that Maga still has. Right, how could
Speaker 2: this be wrong? I mean, you've got a Prince who's
Speaker 2: going there as well. Anyway. Robert Glassman, who represents a
Speaker 2: woman who testified against Maxwell, sharply criticized the Department of
Speaker 2: Justices handling of the Epstein files. He said, the whole
Speaker 2: thing is ridiculous. They were ordered to release information of
Speaker 2: the public to be transparent about Epstein. However, they released
Speaker 2: the names of the courageous victims who have fought hard
Speaker 2: for decades to remain anonymous, and now the limelight whether
Speaker 2: the disclosures were inadvertent or not. They had one job
Speaker 2: to do and they didn't and that job was release
Speaker 2: the information. Don't try to protect anybody but the victims.
Speaker 2: So what they did was they exposed the victims and
Speaker 2: they protected everybody else. The Pedophile Privacy Act is what
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice saw it as. So so far
Speaker 2: there has been no explanation from the Department of Justice
Speaker 2: for the fifty three missing Trump pages, so they refused
Speaker 2: to comment on that. Yet they're still trying to think
Speaker 2: of a plausible lie. I guess. So this is where
Speaker 2: these people are and it truly is amazing. As I said,
Speaker 2: you know, you see people and all these other countries
Speaker 2: are having consequences. It makes you wonder, are we really
Speaker 2: the great Satan that Haran says we are. I think
Speaker 2: we probably are the Satanic government in Washington the District
Speaker 2: of Criminals. And you know, Trump and the GOP are
Speaker 2: not folks anti Washington, They're anti George. They're antithesis of
Speaker 2: George Washington. They are not against the corruption that is
Speaker 2: there rampant in Washington. A good example of this is
Speaker 2: it's not just the Epstein stuff, but they've also got
Speaker 2: another minor sex scandal on their hands. In the GOP.
Speaker 2: They've got a representative Gonzalez, who's about to come up
Speaker 2: for the primaries in Texas, and it came out that
Speaker 2: he was sending sex texts and sexting somebody who worked
Speaker 2: for him, a woman who worked for him, pushing her
Speaker 2: to send him pictures of herself of an intimate nature.
Speaker 2: And I looked at that and immediately thought of the
Speaker 2: two thousand and six paging scandal Republican Mark Foley out
Speaker 2: of Texas, and how he was doing the same thing
Speaker 2: with young teen boy who are working in congress as pages. Now,
Speaker 2: what happened with this guy Gonzalez is that she got
Speaker 2: divorced by her This was made public, and I think
Speaker 2: her husband divorced her and he rejected her because Gonzalez
Speaker 2: is already married and so forth, and so he jolted
Speaker 2: her or whatever. She wound up committing suicide by setting
Speaker 2: herself on fire. And a lot of this stuff has
Speaker 2: just broken. Her husband then went back and got some
Speaker 2: people to help him, some detectives to help him. They
Speaker 2: forensically looked at the phone, and that exposed these horrific
Speaker 2: emails and texts that this guy was sending her. Now,
Speaker 2: all this stuff is broken. So what does the Republican
Speaker 2: Party do about it? Do they say this guy needs
Speaker 2: to leave. No. No, As a matter of fact, Thomas
Speaker 2: Massey and a few women say that. But Speaker of
Speaker 2: the House wants to keep him there, right because he
Speaker 2: wants his numbers. He doesn't care what happens with all
Speaker 2: this stuff. And when I look at this and the
Speaker 2: similarity really to the Mark Foley GP paging scandal of
Speaker 2: two thousand and six, I'll never forget that Dennis Hasterard,
Speaker 2: who was a pedophile wrestling coach in high school, picked
Speaker 2: by the Republican Party to run for Congress because he's blackmailable, right,
Speaker 2: and then he became the Speaker of the House, longest
Speaker 2: serving Republican Speaker of the House ever. Dennis haster the
Speaker 2: pedophile Speaker, went on with Rush Limbaugh. Rushlan Ball hardly
Speaker 2: ever did interviews. He went on with Rush Limbaugh to
Speaker 2: just dismiss all this paging scandal as it's nothing but
Speaker 2: partisan politics. It's just a hoax, right, These people never change.
Speaker 2: When are we going to learn they never change? They
Speaker 2: do the same play over and over again because it
Speaker 2: works didn't actually really work to well for them in
Speaker 2: those midterms. I don't think it's going to work too
Speaker 2: well for them again. But that's what they are wired
Speaker 2: to do, right. It's in their nature to lie, It's
Speaker 2: in their nature to cover up for pedophiles, and that's
Speaker 2: what they did. I guarantee you that if rushland Ball
Speaker 2: was alive today, he would be telling people to move
Speaker 2: on from the Epstein file.
Speaker 3: It's not important. You got to look at the.
Speaker 2: Bigger picture here, just like Ben Shapiro and Mark Levan
Speaker 2: and many other people are doing right now. I guarantee
Speaker 2: you Rush would be pushing that, just move on. But
Speaker 2: he's not alive, and people are not going to move
Speaker 2: on from this stuff. I think what they're going to
Speaker 2: do is they're going to move on from the people
Speaker 2: who are guarding our pedophiles, the GOP and so oh
Speaker 2: one other thing too. Almost forgot Mark Foley, the guy
Speaker 2: who is caught sexting these teen boys who are pages
Speaker 2: in Congress. Guess what he was. He was the co
Speaker 2: chair of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children.
Speaker 2: How about that. People always put themselves in that kind
Speaker 2: of a position, just like Richard Levine the guy called
Speaker 2: himself Rachel. That was the number two at HHS under Biden.
Speaker 2: He was a child psychologist. Yeah. It gives them an opportunity,
Speaker 2: doesn't it. And so when you look at the people
Speaker 2: who are pushing back against it, you got Thomas Massey,
Speaker 2: you got Tim Burchett here in Tennessee said Gonzales should
Speaker 2: do the right thing and resign. You have some women
Speaker 2: Nancy Mace and Paulina Luna and Lauren Bobert are saying that,
Speaker 2: of course Marjorie Taylor Green would be I think she
Speaker 2: has said that on social media, but she's not in
Speaker 2: congress anymore.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: Text messages reportedly show that the congressman made explicit sexual
Speaker 2: requests of his late congressional staffer, who repeatedly resisted that
Speaker 2: was the other things. You need to go to bed.
Speaker 2: I think you've been drinking tonight, that type of thing,
Speaker 2: pushing him back, pushing him back, and then all this
Speaker 2: whole thing blew up on her. She wound up setting
Speaker 2: herself on fire, committing suicide. Tragic. Mike Johnson, when pressed
Speaker 2: about the allegations, however, remarked that well, they're very serious,
Speaker 2: but he would not withdraw his endorsement. His endorsement, He said,
Speaker 2: Gonzalez has to address the matter with his constituents, and
Speaker 2: of course Trump has not come in on the allegation either.
Speaker 2: They also got Jim Jordan and they pressed him on it.
Speaker 2: Prey despicable how he reacted. Its laid out for him
Speaker 2: for Jim Jordan by a reporter and who said there
Speaker 2: was this affair allegedly with a former staffer. She later
Speaker 2: killed herself and now there are text messages that have
Speaker 2: been revealed that suggest she was acting, that he was
Speaker 2: acting very improperly. So your fellow Republicans want him to
Speaker 2: resign over this. Should he resign? This is asked of
Speaker 2: Jim Jordan. What did Jim Jordan say? He said, well,
Speaker 2: should he resign? Well, I leave that up to the
Speaker 2: voters in San Antonio, in South Texas, in his district.
Speaker 2: That's the call for the voters. I've always sort of
Speaker 2: taken the position in the end, it is we the
Speaker 2: people who decide who represents us. There's an election in
Speaker 2: seven days. This is how utterly devoid of any principal
Speaker 2: or morality the leaders of the Republican Party are, and
Speaker 2: of course the Democrats in the same way, They would
Speaker 2: never say to Bill Clinton you should resign.
Speaker 3: Never.
Speaker 2: They defended him to the end and would still do so.
Speaker 2: And so then the reporter replies and says, that are
Speaker 2: you supporting him for reelection? Jordan said, well, we were,
Speaker 2: but there's also this guy who now some of our
Speaker 2: colleagues are supporting mister Herrera. If mister Herrera wins, that's fine.
Speaker 2: Are you going to support Herrera instead of the voters? No,
Speaker 2: I mean, look where for the voters deciding? And then
Speaker 2: the reporter says, so you're neutral, Well, I've done events
Speaker 2: for Tony in the past, Tony Gonzalez, certainly to help
Speaker 2: maintain our majority. That's the only thing that matters to them.
Speaker 2: Power position. Forget about principles, forget about morality. You don't
Speaker 2: want to distance your club. You don't want to kick
Speaker 2: somebody like this out of your club. I mean, even
Speaker 2: Trump claimed that he kicked Epstein out of mar Lago.
Speaker 2: Basically he wasn't a member, but he was allowed to
Speaker 2: still visit there, right according to the latest set of documents.
Speaker 2: But don't you even want to try to distance yourself
Speaker 2: from this guy. No, they don't care. It's simply about
Speaker 2: the numbers. For them. That's where the GOP is. It's
Speaker 2: where they all these political parties have always been. Truly
Speaker 2: is discussing. Well, we got a couple of comments here, Dga,
Speaker 2: thank you very much for the tip, he said, David,
Speaker 2: what you witness last night was one hundred percent staged.
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi wearing a release the Epstein Files. I gonna
Speaker 2: show you she has as much interest in releasing as
Speaker 2: Trump does. Never forget also loot Nik, Yeah, I saw
Speaker 2: clips of Luton make out there laughing and shaking hands.
Speaker 2: All the rest of the stuff has been to the
Speaker 2: island and Bondi was Attorney General of Florida and covered
Speaker 2: for Epstein and the money behind his VP. Peter Thiele
Speaker 2: is all over the files, along with Acosta and Scott Bessant. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it is disgusting. It is disgusting.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I guess. Was Nancy Pelosi wearing a T shirt release
Speaker 2: the Epstein Files. I don't know. I honestly, I said,
Speaker 2: I did not watch it. I typically don't have time
Speaker 2: to watch videos. I usually go for transcripts and because
Speaker 2: I can read them faster than they can watch the
Speaker 2: video if I speed it up. A lot of people
Speaker 2: watch videos and things like that sped up, but I
Speaker 2: usually can't. I miss things because they're going by too quickly.
Speaker 2: I maybe can't understand they're saying. I can skim read
Speaker 2: faster than that, But and I did. I could not
Speaker 2: take two hours of Trump droning on and on lying
Speaker 2: about what he's accomplished. And I think he's even talking
Speaker 2: about that was at fifty thousand points. It's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: I guess that excuses everything, right. Should somebody tap him
Speaker 2: on the shoulder and tell him that most of us
Speaker 2: in America don't own any stocks. I don't care personally
Speaker 2: about what's going on with a Dow at fifty thousand. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I understand. It is an economic metric of we're told
Speaker 2: over and over again how important it says. It's important
Speaker 2: to the people who've got millions of dollars invested in
Speaker 2: I don't have a single penny in the stock market,
Speaker 2: and most Americans don't. So what we gauge the economy
Speaker 2: off of is the price of food that he's made
Speaker 2: more expensive, the cost of taxes and insurance and things
Speaker 2: like that. That's what we look at, and I don't
Speaker 2: see any good news in those economic areas chuly A,
Speaker 2: no justice for the vACC injured after five years of
Speaker 2: fake grifting lawsuits, even after the court's ruled Pfizer did
Speaker 2: just what the DD contract within said.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: Let's not forget that Trump was at the epicenter of
Speaker 2: all of that. And that was the thing that I
Speaker 2: said from the very beginning. That was the when he
Speaker 2: crossed the rubicon once and for all. I mean, prior
Speaker 2: to what happened with a pandemic. Trump was yet another
Speaker 2: politician who says one thing and does another and doesn't
Speaker 2: really pay attention to his promises, you know, his big promises,
Speaker 2: like I'm going to fix this Obamacare mess. He had
Speaker 2: a great plan, was somebody wrote, and then they deleted
Speaker 2: it immediately off of his website as soon as he
Speaker 2: was elected. But it was a great market based reform,
Speaker 2: much needed of the healthcare industry. Never was spoken of
Speaker 2: again after the campaign. And of course all the nonsense
Speaker 2: about immigration and building the wall, and I didn't think
Speaker 2: that was going to be the right approach to take
Speaker 2: with it. But he didn't do anything about immigration, not
Speaker 2: in his first term either, And so you look at
Speaker 2: that and you say, okay, it's just another politician who
Speaker 2: says one thing, does the other and doesn't keep his promises.
Speaker 2: But what happened in twenty twenty, folks, that was crossing
Speaker 2: the rubicon. That was one of the most tyrannical authoritarian
Speaker 2: things I've ever witnessed any president doing. Is absolutely inexcusable.
Speaker 2: I could never support a criminal like that. And the
Speaker 2: stuff that he did with Epstein as well, now that
Speaker 2: that's coming out, everybody should have known about that at
Speaker 2: that point in time. It's all these things, and yet
Speaker 2: you know, people still don't get it with what happened
Speaker 2: with the pandemic mcguffin. They don't see that it was
Speaker 2: a long term plan. And because they don't see that
Speaker 2: it was a long term plan, they don't see Trump
Speaker 2: as being the face of the deep state rather than
Speaker 2: the nemesis of the deep state. Was the fixer guy
Speaker 2: for the globalist agenda, pushing things like universal basic income,
Speaker 2: getting people getting moving, the Overton window, using the stimulus checks,
Speaker 2: and other things like that, while locking people down. It
Speaker 2: was just insane what happened with that. And yeah, there
Speaker 2: hasn't been anything done about that at all. I've got
Speaker 2: a short list here of people that have contributed the
Speaker 2: last couple of days, and I want to thank them.
Speaker 2: We're getting close to the end of the month here
Speaker 2: and on Zel we've had a we've had contributions. I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: this is not yeah, this is Zel. Alex C, Daniel C,
Speaker 2: Sally D, Lois I and Matthew M. Thank you very
Speaker 2: much for your contributions on zell. And in terms of
Speaker 2: cash app, I have that on here too, I think,
Speaker 2: but I can't find it for some reason. There we go, Oop,
Speaker 2: it's not there. So somehow I got the finals messed
Speaker 2: up when I sent it up. But thank you so much.
Speaker 2: And we have two or three people contribute on a
Speaker 2: cash app as well. If you would like to support
Speaker 2: the show, you can go to Davidnight dot news. You
Speaker 2: can see the gas gauge as to where we are
Speaker 2: right now. We're about five eighths and there's links there
Speaker 2: where you can find the program. We always make the
Speaker 2: program free for people who don't put it behind a paywall.
Speaker 2: The support is voluntary and there are places there where
Speaker 2: you can support. We have links to where you can
Speaker 2: support us on cash app and so subscribe Star is
Speaker 2: a very important one for us, as well as an
Speaker 2: address if you want to send a check as well,
Speaker 2: so we have all that information there at Davidnight Dot News. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 2: be right back. I think the thing they.
Speaker 1: Lady using free speech to free minds. It's the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 5: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 5: mobile device. Get the APS radio app today and listen
Speaker 5: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: Zi actually running ads on Fox News selling one hundred
Speaker 2: thousand dollars watches. I haven't seen these ads. I'm just
Speaker 2: wondering if he comes out and opens up his brief,
Speaker 2: his his coat and he's got watches there, you know,
Speaker 2: like some guy that's hitting you up in Times Square
Speaker 2: or something. Times Square. You know, there you go, time X.
Speaker 2: He's launched a luxury watch website. We can purchase a
Speaker 2: limited edition eighteen Carrett gold design for only one hundred
Speaker 2: thousand dollars. This guy is such a huckster. It's amazing.
Speaker 2: He's got his King James bibles that he put out
Speaker 2: that he charged.
Speaker 3: Some exorbitant amount for.
Speaker 2: And again, you know, there's a lot of these translations
Speaker 2: that the companies that publish them have them copyrighted, but
Speaker 2: not King James so he got the text for free,
Speaker 2: and he puts it out there and sells it for
Speaker 2: a tremendous amount of money. He's doing the same thing
Speaker 2: that watches. I guess these things keep really a good
Speaker 2: time for a hundred thousand dollars. That's one of the
Speaker 2: things I've never gotten is you know, white people would
Speaker 2: spend so much money for what I don't even carry.
Speaker 2: I don't even wear a watch. I don't like watches
Speaker 2: and rings on my hands. But I guess it goes
Speaker 2: back to the days when it's working with electronics. It's
Speaker 2: just another thing to electrocute you, you know, or short
Speaker 2: something out.
Speaker 3: Anyway.
Speaker 2: The there's clocks everywhere in modern society. You got them
Speaker 2: pretty much on every device. You got what do you
Speaker 2: need to watch for? You got them in the cars,
Speaker 2: you got them on the walls everywhere. But I guess,
Speaker 2: you know, if you're if you've got to have exact
Speaker 2: split timing when you're giving a speech and somebody's gonna
Speaker 2: pretend to take a shot at you, you got to
Speaker 2: know exactly when it takes a duck. And I guess
Speaker 2: that's the way he ought to do it, because he's
Speaker 2: calling it the fight fight fight watch. So is that
Speaker 2: how he's gonna sell it? Is that the angle? You know,
Speaker 2: this thing can precisely time your ducks when you're doing
Speaker 2: some kind of a w wrestling thing. I got to
Speaker 2: know exactly the split second and wanted to take a dive.
Speaker 2: This is the thing that you need to have. This
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand dollars watch that's out there. Well, they're
Speaker 2: getting ready to do a dive on us. In terms
Speaker 2: of the UFO stuff, I think there's so much talk
Speaker 2: about it, you know, just casually thrown out there by Obama,
Speaker 2: got everybody talking, and the Trump people really jumped on it.
Speaker 2: They're excited about it. It's going to be there probably
Speaker 2: the diversion that they've got coming up. We've got Pete
Speaker 2: Hegseth is talking about it. You had Laura Trump talking
Speaker 2: about it.
Speaker 5: Three days ago.
Speaker 4: President Trump directed you to begin the process of identifying.
Speaker 5: DC, the UFO and are CUP files. Did you ever
Speaker 5: think that you would be the Secretary of War in
Speaker 5: charge of potentially declassifying extraterrestrial life?
Speaker 2: Hemeric.
Speaker 5: I did not. I did not have that on my
Speaker 5: lego card at all.
Speaker 3: He thought he's just gonna kill people.
Speaker 4: I mean We've got to.
Speaker 2: Be right now.
Speaker 5: I don't want to oversell all much time it will take.
Speaker 5: Right We're we're digging in. We're we're going to be
Speaker 5: a full compliance with that executive order.
Speaker 2: You here to provide that for the president.
Speaker 5: So there'll be more coming on that.
Speaker 1: As far as the process of well, and.
Speaker 4: What sort of time frame do you may sensor? Not
Speaker 4: long K.
Speaker 5: I don't have a time frame for you yet, but stambo,
Speaker 5: because we'll get a Ford and you see.
Speaker 1: The aliens trail tap what do you think aliens exist?
Speaker 1: We'll see I get to do the review and find
Speaker 1: out belong with you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we're going to find out what it is.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, Laar Trump has said that
Speaker 2: the president has got his letter already written and just
Speaker 2: waiting for the right time to do it. Yeah. The
Speaker 2: right time to do it might be when those interviews
Speaker 2: with the girl who said she was raped as a
Speaker 2: teen by Trump. That might be the right time for
Speaker 2: us to release the UFO files. Look, a lot of
Speaker 2: people are saying, yeah, they're real, but it's not what
Speaker 2: they're trying to say, you know, And so the secular
Speaker 2: take on it is that they are not interplanetary but interdimensional, well,
Speaker 2: that's kind of part of it. Christians have a different
Speaker 2: point of view about that. I'm not the only one
Speaker 2: who thinks, I mean, this is not a Christian doctrine anywhere,
Speaker 2: It's not in anybody's creed or confession. But most people
Speaker 2: have looked at this and said, yeah, there is. And
Speaker 2: a lot of people, several Christians who have looked at
Speaker 2: the testimonies of people who say they've been abducted everything.
Speaker 2: I really believe there's some kind of a cultic thing
Speaker 2: that's going on here. So yeah, you want to call
Speaker 2: that inter dimensional, I'd call it spiritual. But I think
Speaker 2: it's going to be used as yet another distraction because
Speaker 2: that's what they excel at. And so you know, this
Speaker 2: is on our Bingo card, and it has been for
Speaker 2: a long time. It's decades ago. I was telling my
Speaker 2: son's that it's going to happen in your lifetime. It
Speaker 2: might even happen in my lifetime, as short as that
Speaker 2: may be, who knows, but it is something that I
Speaker 2: think they're reserving that card to put that out there.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about Iran. We want to
Speaker 2: talk about this. When Jeryl Slenty joins us Trump's decision
Speaker 2: as to whether or not to strike Iran will be
Speaker 2: guided by Kushner and Witkoff's advice, Well, on't you just
Speaker 2: say it's going to be guided by Israel to determine
Speaker 2: what's in their best interest, not in our best interest.
Speaker 2: And so this is now being put out by the
Speaker 2: Trump administration. Trump's decision to order airstrikes against Iran will
Speaker 2: hinge in part on the judgment of Trump's special envoys
Speaker 2: Steve Whitcoff and Jared Kushner about whether tron is stalling
Speaker 2: over a deal to relinquish its capability to produce nuclear weapons,
Speaker 2: according to people familiar with the matter. And yet, if
Speaker 2: you are the negotiator, why do you go on on
Speaker 2: Sunday with the Trump's daughter, with Trump's daughter in law,
Speaker 2: Laura Trump, and say, well, they're not capitulating, and even
Speaker 2: though we've got all these military assets that are waiting
Speaker 2: off the coast, they don't seem to realize that. And
Speaker 2: so the talks are going to be held by witcoffin Kushner.
Speaker 2: His assessment will shape Trump's calculus about all this stuff.
Speaker 2: And yet there's a lot of political maneuvering that's going
Speaker 2: on with this. Marco Rubio, always a warhawk, always a
Speaker 2: Zionist as well. Marco Rubio is kind of putting out
Speaker 2: that he's sitting on the fence. I'm not either for
Speaker 2: or against this. Jd Vance is basically doing the same thing.
Speaker 2: Both of them have future political aspirations. And the assessment
Speaker 2: from as I said yesterday, Dan Caine, who was the
Speaker 2: chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, his assessment and
Speaker 2: he's been public with it, and of course jd VANCE
Speaker 2: people evidently leaked this and leaked that jd Vance wanted
Speaker 2: this assessment from him. Again, they're trying to do damage
Speaker 2: control in Advance. I think his assessment was that we're
Speaker 2: pretty low on allies and ammunition. He said, we pretty
Speaker 2: much alienated people there. We look at what Huckaby's done.
Speaker 2: When you look at the statement and from Israel about
Speaker 2: all the different people that they're going to attack at
Speaker 2: the very beginning of this, and I could be saying, yeah,
Speaker 2: all the Middle East really belongs to Israel. God gave
Speaker 2: it to them. So you look at that. There's been
Speaker 2: a huge pushback against all of the Arab states that
Speaker 2: would have typically been allies of the US that have
Speaker 2: historically in the past been allies because it's not monolithic.
Speaker 2: They've got their own rivalries political and religious and economic.
Speaker 3: And then you've got.
Speaker 2: Dan Kin who is saying, you know, we have used
Speaker 2: a lot of our ammunition supplies in terms of supporting
Speaker 2: Ukraine and Israel.
Speaker 3: Already.
Speaker 2: Vance is far less confident about the likelihood of success
Speaker 2: in attacking Iran than he was about the operation to
Speaker 2: capture the Venezuelan president Maduro. These are not even in
Speaker 2: the same universe going and kidnap a guy, or you're
Speaker 2: going to take a gigantic country, which Iran is very
Speaker 2: large country, you're going to take that over, You're going
Speaker 2: to basically do nation building there. Those are very, very different.
Speaker 2: So this is being framed to make Vance look good
Speaker 2: and leaked by people that are in his circle of influence,
Speaker 2: Dan Kine, of the general who is the share of
Speaker 2: the Joint Jesus staff. His concern is centered on the
Speaker 2: low stockpile of anti missile systems. After Trump bombed Iran's
Speaker 2: nuclear richment sites last year, the US fired thirty Patriot
Speaker 2: missiles to intercept Iran counterattacks, the largest single use of
Speaker 2: these missiles in US history. Those counter attacks and we
Speaker 2: don't even want to put a price tag on it.
Speaker 2: Right who cares? Those counter attacks were limited in scope,
Speaker 2: but this time Iran has vowed to retaliate as hard
Speaker 2: as possible in response to any US attack. They warned
Speaker 2: last week that they had the ability to also sink
Speaker 2: a warship with Chinese. These supersonic missiles, Now these missiles
Speaker 2: have not been tested in battle, but they calling them supersonic.
Speaker 2: I don't know if they are like the hypersonic missiles
Speaker 2: for which there's no defense, but these things, nevertheless are supersonic,
Speaker 2: and they do a zigzagging pattern before they strike, so
Speaker 2: they are a huge challenge the Chinese are not the Chinese,
Speaker 2: but the Iranian. A spokesperson tweeted out said a warship
Speaker 2: is a dangerous piece of military hardware. However, more dangerous
Speaker 2: than the warship is the weapon that can send the
Speaker 2: warship to the bottom of the sea. Dan Caine has
Speaker 2: come across as more vocal about his concerns inside the
Speaker 2: Pentagon than he was when he briefed Trump, and what
Speaker 2: officials have privately speculated as an effort to not appear
Speaker 2: to be advocating for a particular course of action. A
Speaker 2: person familiar with the matter said, so Trump has said, yeah,
Speaker 2: he's put out some concerns about this, but if I
Speaker 2: say go, he's going to be leading the charge. You know,
Speaker 2: he's in there completely with us. And so this is
Speaker 2: being put out again. Marco Rubio, I'm not saying yes
Speaker 2: or no. And then you've got JD. Vance says, well,
Speaker 2: look at what dan Kine is saying. You know, he's
Speaker 2: trying to to present both sides as well, the case
Speaker 2: four and the case against as well. But the reality
Speaker 2: here again, China to send Iran aircraft carrier killing missiles.
Speaker 2: These This is the CM three H two cruise weapon.
Speaker 2: And so according to Reuters, Iran is in advanced negotiations
Speaker 2: with Beijing to purchase this, and they've been in negotiations
Speaker 2: to get this weapon since they were attacked by the US.
Speaker 2: And Operation was it Warhammer something like that, which supposedly
Speaker 2: took out all the nuclear weapons, but now we've got
Speaker 2: to go destroy their nuclear program again. You know, the
Speaker 2: same time you got whitch cough in this interview, and
Speaker 2: Trump is doing the same thing in the State of
Speaker 2: the Union speech, basically boasting about how effective Operation Warhammer
Speaker 2: was in terms of taking out their nuclear stuff and
Speaker 2: then immediately turning around and saying, well, we've got to
Speaker 2: go back and finish the job. So then you either
Speaker 2: took it out, or you didn't take it out, or
Speaker 2: you're lying both times. They can travel about four times
Speaker 2: the speed of sound, They carry a quarter ton of explosives,
Speaker 2: they can conduct and zigzagging evasive maneuvers in the final
Speaker 2: phase of flight to confuse ship's defenses. I think Warpeat
Speaker 2: would call this lethality. Is always boasting about the USS
Speaker 2: Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group is currently stationed in the
Speaker 2: Arabian Sea south of Iran. A second carrier group, the
Speaker 2: USS gerald Ford, is approaching the region and is photographed
Speaker 2: in crete. There's also photographs that have come out about
Speaker 2: the gerald Ford and they're having some kind of a
Speaker 2: septic issue with it on the aircraft carrier and the
Speaker 2: pictures of brown water slashing down the aisles and stuff
Speaker 2: like that. Remember when we were on that Chinese train.
Speaker 2: It made me think of that. I told that to
Speaker 2: Karen Travis and she said, don't even mention that was
Speaker 2: the most disgusting thing that toilet said. We're overflowing and
Speaker 2: leaking down the hallway of the train. You know, people
Speaker 2: talking about China having a great train system. They did
Speaker 2: have a great train system between Guangzhou and Hong Kong,
Speaker 2: two large modern cities, But we go into the interior
Speaker 2: of China. No, that thing that was an unbelievable mess.
Speaker 2: The solution they had was to put down some some
Speaker 2: wood slats that you could walk on that were just
Speaker 2: slightly higher than the slashing sewer water that was down
Speaker 2: in the hallway. But I look at this on an
Speaker 2: aircraft carrier. You know it's a I guess you could
Speaker 2: say that gerald Ford has got dysentery. I don't know.
Speaker 2: That's been the downfall of many an army in the past.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's going to work that way
Speaker 2: of the aircraft carrier. And again you see a couple
Speaker 2: of picked I don't know how widespread that is, but
Speaker 2: there was talk about that being fairly widespread on the carrier.
Speaker 2: The US is amassing the largest concentration of sea and
Speaker 2: airpower in the Middle East since the Second Gulf War.
Speaker 2: As Trump threatens Tehran an effort to enforce restrictions on
Speaker 2: nuclear and ballistic missile programs. The loss of even a
Speaker 2: single ship would be a historic humiliation for the US
Speaker 2: politically disastrous for Trump, writes the Telegraph, and it would
Speaker 2: be that's one of the reasons why Advance is hedging
Speaker 2: his bets and why Rubio is doing this. If Trump
Speaker 2: does this for Israel, he's putting his presidency on the
Speaker 2: line in a big way. And let me just say that,
Speaker 2: if he loses a lot of political capital and people
Speaker 2: want to distance themselves from him, you're going to see
Speaker 2: all of that protective bubble around him in terms of
Speaker 2: this Epstein stuff collapse as well. If you have a
Speaker 2: carrier that goes to the bottom of the sea with
Speaker 2: all the people on board, you're going to have He's
Speaker 2: going to lose all this political cover for the Epstein thing.
Speaker 2: I don't want to see that happen, even though I'd
Speaker 2: like to see him lose his political cover. This cruise
Speaker 2: missile that China has is the export variant of their
Speaker 2: supersonic anti ship cruise missiles designed for that They approached
Speaker 2: the target just right above the waves, right above the
Speaker 2: surface of the water, very difficult to shoot down. They
Speaker 2: have range about one hundred and eighty miles. Reuters reported
Speaker 2: that as talks to by the missiles entered their final phase.
Speaker 2: Last summer, Iran sent a team of senior military and
Speaker 2: government officials to China. China has always opposed the West's
Speaker 2: actions in Iran, and the nineteen eighties they were very
Speaker 2: actively arming Iran. There was a lot of international pressure
Speaker 2: in the nineties and so they stopped doing that, but
Speaker 2: they're now doing it again. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: it's not just China, but it's also Russia. Iran and
Speaker 2: Russia have also conducted joint naval exercises and Thursday and
Speaker 2: the Gulf of Oman and the Northern Indian Ocean Ron
Speaker 2: conducted live fire drills and the Straight of Her moves
Speaker 2: last week, temporarily shutting down the oil going through that waterway,
Speaker 2: which is about twenty percent of global oil production passes.
Speaker 2: When you stop and think about the cost of this,
Speaker 2: I mean the cost in terms of missile costs, in
Speaker 2: terms of lives lost and all the rest of stuff
Speaker 2: is huge. But there's also going to be a tremendous
Speaker 2: disruption in what happens to oil because you know they're
Speaker 2: going to shut down the Strait of Hormos if there's
Speaker 2: a there's a war there. That's going to have massive
Speaker 2: global consequences. So we'll see what happens with that. I
Speaker 2: want to get Joe Clinti's take on this when he
Speaker 2: joins us again. The significant risks that are being warned
Speaker 2: about by General dan Kane. According to the Wall Street Journal,
Speaker 2: this is being reported by the way, widely reported by
Speaker 2: mainstream media. Wall Street Journal, Reuters, New York Times, Axios,
Speaker 2: all of them have a lot of articles about what
Speaker 2: dan Kin is saying. There's a lot of a lot
Speaker 2: of people trying to distance themselves from this war that
Speaker 2: they see coming, by the way, not Lindsey Graham, though.
Speaker 3: He's dumping in with both feet.
Speaker 2: It truly is amazing to see Lindsey Graham never never changes.
Speaker 2: This guy is always consistent, consistently wrong. General dan Kaine
Speaker 2: said Trump, like all of us, would like to not
Speaker 2: see a war. But if a decision is made his opinion,
Speaker 2: it'll be not something it's easily one. But we know
Speaker 2: that he will be leading the pack, said Trump. And
Speaker 2: so then we have Lindsey Graham that was asked about this,
Speaker 2: and he lamented over the weekend that some of Trump's
Speaker 2: advisors were warning him of risks. We don't want any
Speaker 2: advisers warning us of risks don't want any downside of
Speaker 2: any of that. He says, I understand concerns about major
Speaker 2: military operations in the least given past entanglements. However, the
Speaker 2: voices who counsel against getting entangled, like George Washington, you know,
Speaker 2: seem to ignore the consequences of letting evil go unchecked,
Speaker 2: well as John Quincy Adams, who said we don't go
Speaker 2: abroad seeking monsters to destroy right anyway, Graham said. From
Speaker 2: actualo's reports said that Graham has told the President that
Speaker 2: he should ignore his advisors who are urging caution. Throw
Speaker 2: caution to the wind. Right. He said, any attack on
Speaker 2: Iran could lead to US casualties, but other people being
Speaker 2: killed is worth it, right, Basically, it's what he's saying.
Speaker 2: He said, the risk of America is being killed was
Speaker 2: worth it. Is just like mad Woman Albright, who when
Speaker 2: she was they asked her, you know, these sanctions that
Speaker 2: you did against the Rock estimated cost five hundred thousand
Speaker 2: children's lives dying of starvation. She said it was worth it.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: The that's that's the key issue here. Whatever happens, Lindsay
Speaker 2: thinks it's worth it because he's part of the Machiavelian
Speaker 2: industrial complex. Well, we got Joe Lindy ready to come
Speaker 2: on with us, So we're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks, and joining us now is Gerald Slinty.
Speaker 2: And it's Wednesday and the day that a new trans
Speaker 2: Journal is released, and we got the cover of it.
Speaker 2: See if you can pull that up, Travis. It says
Speaker 2: whether you love tariffs or hate tariffs, that's not the question.
Speaker 2: Sometimes you need a dictator, says Trump, and I can
Speaker 2: do anything I want, and that is the issue. That
Speaker 2: is the issue, folks. As with so many things with
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, it's not so much what he does, but
Speaker 2: it's the way that he does it that is disastrous
Speaker 2: and dangerous as well. Thank you for joining us, Jerald,
Speaker 2: And of course, folks, if you want to get the
Speaker 2: trans Journal again released every week on Wednesday, a great
Speaker 2: source of information. We're talk about some of the featured
Speaker 2: articles on here today. You can get ten percent off
Speaker 2: if you use the code Night at transjournal dot com.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us, Jerald. You're spot on with that,
Speaker 2: with that Covery spot on with that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's his quotes that we're not making it up. Yeah,
Speaker 5: sometimes you need to dictate it. I can do anything
Speaker 5: I want. I mean, you know what, who the hell
Speaker 5: are you to say this crap?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Who the hell are you?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Right?
Speaker 5: You left? Oh ef a, hef a billion dollars worth
Speaker 5: of real estate? All right, I'm a little spoiled daddy's boy. Again,
Speaker 5: that's a fact. His brother Robin, who I had lunch
Speaker 5: with back in twenty seventeen, he told me when the
Speaker 5: father died back in two thousand and two, left over
Speaker 5: half a billion dollars worth of real estate to the family.
Speaker 5: That was back then. Yeah yeah, yeah, Now how much
Speaker 5: is that that real estate worth? There's nothing more on
Speaker 5: a spoil Who the hell is eating say that? You?
Speaker 5: Sometimes you need to dictate. I could do whatever I want.
Speaker 5: How about we the people? Screw you? What do you mean?
Speaker 5: We the people?
Speaker 2: And he's one of the most corrupt presidents I've ever seen.
Speaker 2: In front of everybody, He's out there enriching himself using
Speaker 2: his connections be coase he claims it's his family, just
Speaker 2: like letting it. Claims it's his family that's out there
Speaker 2: doing this stuff. But the amount of money that he's
Speaker 2: made in crypto as he's manipulating things is he's essentially
Speaker 2: getting paid for his influence, and he's not even trying
Speaker 2: to hide it except to say that it's Don Junior
Speaker 2: and Erica are doing it. You know, when I talked
Speaker 2: about this the other day about Trump losing his teriff authority,
Speaker 2: I said, you know, he immediately illustrated why this should
Speaker 2: not be done by one individual, why it's in the
Speaker 2: constitution that you don't have one individual setting these things up.
Speaker 2: Because immediately he says, all right, that's it ten percent
Speaker 2: on everybody in the world, and within the next within
Speaker 2: twenty four hours, he's jumped it up to fifteen percent.
Speaker 2: You know, all this stuff about Trump always chickens out,
Speaker 2: the Taco stuff, that's not true. He's not chickening out,
Speaker 2: but he's always changing his orders. That's really what Taco
Speaker 2: stands for. Trump always changing orders, and it's that chaos
Speaker 2: that has been so destructive to the economy and individual companies.
Speaker 2: Nobody can make a plan because he's constantly changing the rates.
Speaker 2: You never know what he's going to do. Did he
Speaker 2: have a bad night last night? Is there somebody in
Speaker 2: another country that he's angry at. He's going to jack
Speaker 2: up the teriffs.
Speaker 5: Going back to what the family. This is one of
Speaker 5: the articles in this week's Trends Journal. And by the way,
Speaker 5: if you put in a night, it's course the grand
Speaker 5: total of two dollars and fifty cents a week, pennies
Speaker 5: a day, and the magazine is about about one hundred
Speaker 5: and eighty five pages.
Speaker 2: This week.
Speaker 5: You read what you want, geopolitics, socioeconomics, high tech science, AI.
Speaker 5: It's a magazine anyway, and it's in different languages, and
Speaker 5: you could, you know, you could read it online, print
Speaker 5: it out as a PDF. But anyway, Eric Trump backs
Speaker 5: quote low cost per kill end quote Israel drone maker's
Speaker 5: merger with small Florida construction company in hopes of making
Speaker 5: the taking the company public.
Speaker 2: Yeah that's right, all right, Yeah, kill for profit. Yep,
Speaker 2: the Machiavellian industrial complex.
Speaker 5: Trump's Sun takes a victory lap at World Liberty Financial
Speaker 5: conference at marl Largo.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're not about world liberty. That digital currency, as
Speaker 2: you pointed out back in twenty twenty, you said, from
Speaker 2: dirty cash to digital trash. And so that's all about
Speaker 2: surveillance and control. It's not about global liberty. It's about
Speaker 2: global tyranny and surveillance and controlling when people can spend
Speaker 2: money and when they can't, why they can spend money on,
Speaker 2: and what they can't spend money on, and where they
Speaker 2: can spend money where they can't.
Speaker 5: All the money they're making on us, billions of dollars
Speaker 5: they're making are ready billions on all the different deals
Speaker 5: that they're doing. Oh and now it's where they're going
Speaker 5: to build another a billion dollar Trump tower. I forgot
Speaker 5: what country, Australia.
Speaker 2: That's Australia, going to be the tallest building in Australia. Yeah,
Speaker 2: what he is doing is an other time he would
Speaker 2: be impeached for this kind of corruption. But they're just
Speaker 2: letting him do whatever he wishes.
Speaker 5: Well again talking about letting him do whatever he wishes,
Speaker 5: and what's going on with Iran? As you were talking
Speaker 5: about an article in this week's Trends Journal about that
Speaker 5: issue about how let's see Trump puts US on the
Speaker 5: precipice of war with Iran. Hardly a peep of resistance
Speaker 5: in Congress, well, mainstream media, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the only resistance that i've seen put up against
Speaker 2: It is Thomas Massey and roe Quahanna again actually pushing
Speaker 2: this thing, and they've tried to do this before, but
Speaker 2: they don't have the votes, not even with the Democrats.
Speaker 2: The Democrats revote because again it is this is something
Speaker 2: that Israel wants and so they're not going to go
Speaker 2: against that.
Speaker 5: Well, that's the another article Conna Mass. You say they'll
Speaker 5: force a vote on War Powers resolution amid risk of
Speaker 5: war with Iran. But then again we go on to
Speaker 5: show that they're not going to get the votes, and
Speaker 5: even if they get it, Trump is going to veto it. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and they're not going to get a two thirds vote
Speaker 5: to override the veto.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's sad, and we're just sleepwalking
Speaker 2: into this thing. One of the things I think is
Speaker 2: interesting is that you've got people like Marco Rubio and JD.
Speaker 2: Vans are trying to distance themselves from this because the
Speaker 2: military is telling them, hey, this is not going to
Speaker 2: be anything at all like what happened in Venezuela. Of
Speaker 2: course it isn't. I mean that we're not trying to
Speaker 2: do nation building there yet. And they just went in
Speaker 2: and kidnapped a guy this is completely different. And the
Speaker 2: Chair of the Joint Jesus Staff is talking about the
Speaker 2: fact that we're low on allies and low on AMMO,
Speaker 2: and China is stocking them up with any ship missiles
Speaker 2: and that are supersonic and designed to travel just over
Speaker 2: the surface of the water and that type of thing.
Speaker 2: So this is going to be something could be very
Speaker 2: very expensive politically damaging a lot to a Trump. People
Speaker 2: aren't paying attention to it. Now, if you lose one
Speaker 2: of these aircraft carriers, people are going to pay a
Speaker 2: lot of attention to it.
Speaker 5: Then, Yes and no, because here's what happens. All of
Speaker 5: this sudden, they'll be in a check against the United
Speaker 5: States and we have to go to a full war
Speaker 5: against Iraq. He'll do something a false flag event. Oh,
Speaker 5: let's go back again to the facts. We've talked about
Speaker 5: this a dozen times. Anybody could google it up. On
Speaker 5: July twenty sixth, nineteen forty one, President Franklin Roosevelt seizes
Speaker 5: all Japanese assets in America. Why because those dirty Japanese
Speaker 5: invaded French Indo China. Wait a minute, French in dot China.
Speaker 5: You mean Frances that invaded about twenty six countries during
Speaker 5: that time, and you got the nerve to call Vietnam,
Speaker 5: Laos and Cambodia, French, Indo, China and what the hell
Speaker 5: do I care? I'm an American exactly. And then the
Speaker 5: UK and the Dutch East Indy's dutchyst Sindy's What the
Speaker 5: hell are the Dutch doing in Indonesia? Shut the hell
Speaker 5: upper right, We're doing the same thing the British are
Speaker 5: with the sun never sets on the British Empire, stealing, rabbaging,
Speaker 5: and pillaging. Okay, that be those three countries cut off
Speaker 5: three quarters. You could google it up history today, three
Speaker 5: quarters of Japanese trade eighty eight percent of their imported oil.
Speaker 5: They only import one hundred percent and stole their money.
Speaker 5: I can't understand why they bomb prol Harbor back a
Speaker 5: couple of months.
Speaker 2: Later, That's right.
Speaker 5: What I'm saying is they're going to do something. They'll
Speaker 5: blame Iran after they attack Iran for attacking the United States,
Speaker 5: and the people will swallow it, just like they did
Speaker 5: in World War Two, just like they did in World
Speaker 5: War One. I I'm a Yankee doodle dandy, a Yankee
Speaker 5: doodle doode, all right, right, how about the dot com
Speaker 5: bust again, which we had forecast in the trans Journal
Speaker 5: back when it was a quarterly now it's a weekly.
Speaker 5: In September of nineteen ninety nine, we said it would
Speaker 5: bust by the second quarter of two thousand, which it
Speaker 5: didn't launch. What happened, Oh, Nastik was down and what
Speaker 5: happened nine eleven. Yeah, everybody forgot about it. So when
Speaker 5: you're talking about go to war against Iran and how
Speaker 5: the people will be opposed to it, now there'll be
Speaker 5: a false flag event that the people will support a
Speaker 5: full fledged war. Do it all the time?
Speaker 2: I agree. As a matter of fact, I had a
Speaker 2: clip and I messed it up. I couldn't put it
Speaker 2: in the deck the other day. But a clip that
Speaker 2: came across a couple of years ago. Guy, he's talking
Speaker 2: to one of these meetings that they have, one of
Speaker 2: these globalist meetings, you know, councilor formulations or something, and
Speaker 2: he's he's recounting all this stuff.
Speaker 3: He goes, yeah, you know, we had the Gulf of
Speaker 3: Conkin event, and we had.
Speaker 2: Fort Sumter, we had Pearl Harbor, we had remember the
Speaker 2: main It starts going down all these different things. He goes,
Speaker 2: so be really helpful if Iran were to attack us
Speaker 2: first and the people kind of halfway laughed and then applauded,
Speaker 2: And that's exactly I think what they're going to do.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 2: I talked about this the other day, talked about on
Speaker 2: Monday Gerald when we had all this stuff that's happening
Speaker 2: in Mexico, and I said, you know, if they wanted
Speaker 2: to do a false flag event, they could do something
Speaker 2: and either step aside and let the cartels do something,
Speaker 2: or they could do something themselves, of course, and blame
Speaker 2: it on the cartels and say the cartels were allied
Speaker 2: with Iran, and then it's on. Right, we got wars everywhere.
Speaker 2: It's a nice distraction. I mean, there's a lot of
Speaker 2: different ways that they could pull this thing off. And
Speaker 2: of course, we are incredibly vulnerable here in America. Our
Speaker 2: infrastructure is incredibly vulnerable, our border is vulnerable. You could
Speaker 2: have individual saboteurs come across the border very easily, come
Speaker 2: into this country and take out massive amounts of infrastructure.
Speaker 2: That's the kind of stuff really when you look at
Speaker 2: Ukraine and Russia, they're attacking each other's infrastructure, power generation
Speaker 2: stations and stuff like that. That's really going to be
Speaker 2: the key issue there, and that's something that they could
Speaker 2: easily do here in America as a false flying attack
Speaker 2: and blame it on anybody they wanted to blame it on.
Speaker 5: You got it in cybery warm.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, of course, the cyber war. You know,
Speaker 2: when they do that, we haven't had the CIA had
Speaker 2: their tools hacked, and wiki leaks first put out the
Speaker 2: manual that was Vault seven, showing that they could disguise
Speaker 2: themselves to look like anybody that they wanted to look like,
Speaker 2: and then the entire code was leaked by the people
Speaker 2: who stole it. So now I guess even the small
Speaker 2: countries can make it look like they're anybody that they
Speaker 2: want to make it look like. And so whenever they
Speaker 2: tell you that there's a cyber attack and it was
Speaker 2: done by our enemy over there, you can take that
Speaker 2: with a grain of salt. There's no way that they
Speaker 2: can determine that they've even got programs to make it
Speaker 2: look like it's whoever they want to make it look like.
Speaker 5: Theyn't make up anything they want. Yeah, and again they
Speaker 5: lie all the time. Hey, you forgot that, Saam, who's
Speaker 5: saying how your weapons the mass destruction.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I know, yeah, we're back. We're back to baby
Speaker 3: incubator time now again. I guess yeah.
Speaker 5: Remember that one who was the woman that was the
Speaker 5: saying this, that was her father was what an ambassador
Speaker 5: or something. You know, there was a whole lie and
Speaker 5: the people bought. They bought from the old man Bush
Speaker 5: and from the little clown boys son.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: And I just remind people again, you know when we
Speaker 2: talk about the lies about weapons of mass destruction. That
Speaker 2: was one of the things when Trump was running for
Speaker 2: president the first time. He was talking about the fact
Speaker 2: that we were lied into war with Iraq, and that
Speaker 2: was unusual for politician that's running for presidency to say
Speaker 2: that that the entire Iraq war was based on a
Speaker 2: lie about weapons of mass destruction. And yet he put
Speaker 2: Gina Haspell, the person who covered all of that up,
Speaker 2: the person who sent the whistleblower John Kiriaku to prison.
Speaker 3: He put her in charge of the CIA.
Speaker 2: So, on the one hand, Trump tells us this is
Speaker 2: all based on a lie, there were no weapons of
Speaker 2: mass destruction.
Speaker 3: They but it's the.
Speaker 2: Chief liar and torturer in charge of the CIA that
Speaker 2: tells you a lot about Trump, doesn't it?
Speaker 5: Yep? And you better be careful what you say because
Speaker 5: people they love Trump so much. I'm getting I just
Speaker 5: got somebody posted on after I did the podcast last night.
Speaker 5: My shotgun wants to blow your brains out. Wow f
Speaker 5: in Guinea. Yep.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, yeah, it's That's something I've been seeing for
Speaker 2: quite some time. Haven't gotten any death threats.
Speaker 5: Oh, I'm getting a number of them. Well yeah, and again,
Speaker 5: you can't come out. You can't come out against Trump
Speaker 5: because you gotta believe Trump's lies. Don't believe the lies.
Speaker 5: How about this one? This is when he's running for
Speaker 5: president back in twenty twenty four. We want to have
Speaker 5: peace on Earth all over. September twenty fifth. We're going
Speaker 5: to have peace through strength. We will not have to fight.
Speaker 5: October twelfth, twenty four. I'm not going to start a war.
Speaker 5: I'm going to stop wars. October twentieth, twenty twenty fourth. Yeah,
Speaker 5: I'm moving quickly to nd wars, settled conflicts, and restore
Speaker 5: the planet to peace. I want peace. January twenty fifth,
Speaker 5: twenty twenty five. One lie after another, Oh yeah, one
Speaker 5: lie right after another. How many times did he bombed Somalia.
Speaker 5: I think he's about one hundred and thirty times now
Speaker 5: bombed the rock, bomb Dran, bomb Syria, bomb Yemen. Kime
Speaker 5: noted the president of Venezuela and his wife killing people
Speaker 5: and boats against international law, killing him right front right.
Speaker 3: Nobody cares, right, nobody does.
Speaker 2: It's a shame. And you know when you look at
Speaker 2: him lying just the whole justification what he didn't say
Speaker 2: much at all about Iran. He doesn't have to. He
Speaker 2: just does whatever he wants. And yet people called out
Speaker 2: Susan Levitt, the White House spokesperson. Yesterday, I played the
Speaker 2: clip they said Trump said with Operation Warhammer whatever that
Speaker 2: he called that thing, said he destroyed all the nuclear
Speaker 2: capability of Iran. He's boasting about that. And yet now
Speaker 2: we have to go back because Steve Whitkoff says they're
Speaker 2: just a couple of weeks away from having a nuclear weapon. Says,
Speaker 2: how can both of these things? You mean, Steve, yeah,
Speaker 2: how can both these things be true?
Speaker 5: There? Eli ut Nick, Scott Nick slut Nick, look at
Speaker 5: the look at the slime balls that we got, look
Speaker 5: at them.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 2: And so they tell you in the same statement about
Speaker 2: what is happening with Iran. They they contradict themselves. And
Speaker 2: of course she just she accuses the mainstream media of
Speaker 2: lying about everything when she's lying about what's going on
Speaker 2: with Iran in the nuclear program, the same lies that
Speaker 2: we've been told from net Yahoo for over thirty years.
Speaker 2: And then right after she has that encounter in the afternoon,
Speaker 2: Trump repeats all of that stuff as part of his
Speaker 2: State of the Disunion. You know, he says, yeah, we
Speaker 2: destroyed the nuclear program, and so now we've got to
Speaker 2: go back and destroy the nuclear program. Yeah, and nobody
Speaker 2: ever calls him on that. It's truly amazing.
Speaker 5: We have an article, a guest article in this week's
Speaker 5: Trends Journal. Trump is Netnyahu's puppet.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yep.
Speaker 5: That's by doctor Paul Craig Roberts, who was the former
Speaker 5: assistant Treasury secretary in the Ronald Reagan That's the same
Speaker 5: Paul Craig Roberts that wrote this article in the Trends
Speaker 5: Journal back in two thousand and fourteen. Washington is driving
Speaker 5: the world to the final war. World agemony is not
Speaker 5: a right America has earned that Washington included that Russia
Speaker 5: needed to be confronted with or distracted by problems that
Speaker 5: would leave the Russian government less confident or able to
Speaker 5: count of Washington's aggression elsewhere. Ukraine presented the perfect opportunity
Speaker 5: to Washington to advance its hegemonic agenda. In a speech
Speaker 5: at the National Press Club last December, which was twenty
Speaker 5: and thirteen, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Newlan boasted that
Speaker 5: Washington had invested five billion dollars in non governmental organizations
Speaker 5: and goos in Ukraine for the purpose to teach democracy.
Speaker 3: Democracy meaning coups.
Speaker 5: Right, they overthrew the government, the democratically elected government to
Speaker 5: Victor Yanikovich. People have no idea about this. They not word.
Speaker 5: Oh and who did it? Oh, the Azovs, the Nazi Ukrainians. Yeah,
Speaker 5: that created that false thing at Maiden Square. People have
Speaker 5: no idea about this. So anyway, Another article by doctor
Speaker 5: Paul Craig Roberts in this week's trans Journal about how
Speaker 5: Trump is net Yahoo's puppet. Oh and I forgot about
Speaker 5: Sheldon Adelson's wife, Mary Natolson. How much did she give
Speaker 5: Trump in his election? They say between one hundred million
Speaker 5: to two hundred and fifty million dollars. Is the Trump
Speaker 5: that when her husband, Sheldon Nagelsen, gave him one hundred
Speaker 5: million dollars. He moved to Trump when he was president
Speaker 5: the last time, moved the embassy from Tel Aviv to
Speaker 5: Jerusalem and said to Israel, Hey, you know that land
Speaker 5: you stole from Syria in the Golden Heights, it's yours.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's basically what How can he be saying
Speaker 2: this week?
Speaker 3: You know the entirement, by the way.
Speaker 5: That was the other thing. How could be you're talking
Speaker 5: about Lindsey Graham. How the hell could this little piece
Speaker 5: of crap jerk off over there in South Carolina keep
Speaker 5: getting so much damn press for decades? Little Lindsey ballis Graham. Yeah, all,
Speaker 5: I got it. We have this crap shooting out of
Speaker 5: this clown boy's mouth. I'll tell you a story. Back
Speaker 5: in the day, I used to be on all the
Speaker 5: major media, you remember, And I'm up here in Kingston.
Speaker 5: As you came, you can been here here. Back in
Speaker 5: the day, they used to have the satellite trucks doing
Speaker 5: the broadcast live Fox. Obama's overthrowing the government of Libya. Right,
Speaker 5: I'm on with a former CIA guy on Fox, and
Speaker 5: what happens? We got to take a break now we
Speaker 5: got to cut Senator Lindsey Graham would be on This
Speaker 5: is a Lie broadcast.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 5: I got to hear about Senna Lindsey Graham. They've they've
Speaker 5: been they've been promoting this little piece of scum to
Speaker 5: how many decades, A little nobody, that's right, A little
Speaker 5: nobody who loves war that couldn't fight his way out
Speaker 5: of a paper bag.
Speaker 2: And what does that tell us about the Machiavellian Industrial
Speaker 2: Complex and these people who are making millions every time
Speaker 2: they fire off a missile. Yeah, of course we want
Speaker 2: more missiles fired off. I mean, you know, that's one
Speaker 2: of the things Dan King was saying, says, we depleted
Speaker 2: so many of our missiles, you know, we during defending
Speaker 2: Israel and giving them away to Ukraine all the rest
Speaker 2: of the stuff. We don't have any left for our wars,
Speaker 2: you know. So I guess we're going to have to
Speaker 2: write a big fat check to the Machiavellian Industrial Complex.
Speaker 2: And of course that's why Lindsey Graham is on all
Speaker 2: the time. Isn't because he's their salesman?
Speaker 5: Yep? A little nobody, yeah that's right, literally a ballish
Speaker 5: little clown, or is it, Miss Lindsey Graham. Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 5: So a little nothing. These little scumbags that wants to
Speaker 5: go like a Huckleberry, a dingle Berry, go fight or
Speaker 5: shut your mouth.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 5: Anybody that supports war in another country go over there
Speaker 5: and fight or shut your damn mouth.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Mike Cuckabee is not an ambassador for the US.
Speaker 2: He's not an ambassador for Christ either. That's the reality
Speaker 2: of both of those.
Speaker 5: They have fairy tales. I don't want to hear your
Speaker 5: fairy tale anymore.
Speaker 2: Well, he's got it wrong in terms of what he's
Speaker 2: looking at, I believe, and he's completely lost the plot
Speaker 2: that Christ gave us. That's the key thing. And he
Speaker 2: doesn't care about America either. He doesn't even regret, you know,
Speaker 2: his meeting with Jonathan Pollard, one of the biggest.
Speaker 3: Traders to the US ever.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he supports that because Huckabee himself is a trader.
Speaker 5: I think we've got to read about that in the
Speaker 5: magazine this week.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think we've got to re establish the connect. No,
Speaker 2: we don't, okay, are we okay? Travis, Okay, We're going
Speaker 2: to keep going here. I think we're all right for
Speaker 2: a little while longer here, let's talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about what's going on with the marketplace, because you know,
Speaker 2: the Dow at fifty thousand. He mentioned that again, and
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi said, you know, shut up, stop asking me
Speaker 2: questions about Trump raping kids.
Speaker 3: The Dow's at fifty thousand.
Speaker 2: Somebody put out a meme showing the stock market crashing
Speaker 2: and said, well, can can we now investigate Epstein now
Speaker 2: that there's below fifty thousand? And of course, when we
Speaker 2: look at the stock market, it's not only the fact
Speaker 2: that most Americans don't have any equities in the stock market.
Speaker 2: And as a matter of fact, when you look at
Speaker 2: the stock market, the rising Dow is based on the
Speaker 2: fact that you've got just a couple of stocks around
Speaker 2: AI like Nvidia and others. And it's such a narrow
Speaker 2: rally that it kind of looks like a needle, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: They could be busted in a bubble. And so what
Speaker 2: do you see happening with that?
Speaker 5: Well, again, we have a number of articles in the
Speaker 5: Trends Journal about the money leaving the equity markets and
Speaker 5: going to Europe in Asia. And when you look at
Speaker 5: bragging about the Dow at five thousand. But when you're
Speaker 5: looking at how much the other equity markets are going up,
Speaker 5: America is way behind.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it was the Dow at five
Speaker 2: or fifty. I forget there's one of them. Have different
Speaker 2: exchanges that are there. But the key issue that Trump
Speaker 2: doesn't want to talk about is, well, let's look at
Speaker 2: gold at five thousand. Right, you want to talk about
Speaker 2: your stock index at fifty thousand, what about gold? And
Speaker 2: why is gold there? That's a vote of no confidence
Speaker 2: from a large marketplace.
Speaker 5: I think ys it went on the air. Goal was
Speaker 5: about about five thousand, one hundred and ninety dollars. And
Speaker 5: you know, silvers keeps breaking over the marks keep you know,
Speaker 5: it's way beyond, it's below where it's high, but still
Speaker 5: way up there. And precious metals are going up because
Speaker 5: the global economy is going down again. We have an
Speaker 5: article in this week's Trends Journal, it's in our Economic
Speaker 5: Update showing about how the market the money's flooding out
Speaker 5: of America and we write, indeed, this is also one
Speaker 5: reason why europe stock markets are gaining record inflows as
Speaker 5: investors pivot away from US equities. And the reason is
Speaker 5: is that all this over investing in AI and according
Speaker 5: to l SEG data, stocks Europe six hundred trades at
Speaker 5: a PE ratio of eighteen point three, the S and P,
Speaker 5: and the United States the PE ratio twenty seven point seven. Wow,
Speaker 5: it's way way overvalued. Again, the money is pouring out
Speaker 5: of the country in stocks and going to other nations.
Speaker 5: And again what we're saying is here, they just had
Speaker 5: a big meeting in India last week. It was called
Speaker 5: the India AI Impact Summit, hardly reported in the mainstream media.
Speaker 5: You had the top people, the top high tech guys
Speaker 5: from Google, all of going over to India. India's going
Speaker 5: high tech, China's going high tech AI. They're investing very
Speaker 5: heavily in this. You don't have to be good to
Speaker 5: man to figure this out. You put India and China together,
Speaker 5: what do you got two point eight billion people? Yeah,
Speaker 5: verse three hundred and hundred and forty six million in America,
Speaker 5: and then you had a lot of world leaders going
Speaker 5: to this this AI Impact summit in India. They're going
Speaker 5: to go AI. They over invested in the AI markets
Speaker 5: in America. And as you pointed out, it's the few
Speaker 5: companies that quote Magnificent seven and others that have jacked
Speaker 5: up the equity markets. There's going to be a dot
Speaker 5: com bus two point zero in America. They're going to crash. Yeah, Asia, China,
Speaker 5: and India are going to lead the charge is you're
Speaker 5: talking earlier before I even came on the air about
Speaker 5: the United States ramping up the war with Iran, and
Speaker 5: while the ships out there, the money being spent, the
Speaker 5: business of America is war and the business of China
Speaker 5: and India is business.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, And that's the key thing. You know,
Speaker 2: if we're smart about this, we understand it's not the
Speaker 2: trade deficit. It's the budget deficit of our government, and
Speaker 2: that is completely being ignored by Trump. Many people have
Speaker 2: pointed out in the past that it's that in and
Speaker 2: of itself, is a huge threat to our safety and security.
Speaker 2: It's the threat to our economic security as well as
Speaker 2: our safety because always in the past, when you look
Speaker 2: at how America has a prospered and done I shouldn't
Speaker 2: say prosper but how they've done well in war, that's
Speaker 2: been predominantly based on our productive capacity. Where you're talking
Speaker 2: about World War one, World War II, or the Civil War.
Speaker 2: Things like that that is really the key thing, and
Speaker 2: if we are so heavily in debt, we can't do that.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we're going
Speaker 2: to re establish connection. We've got a tech issue here
Speaker 2: and Gerald, we're going to be right back. So watch
Speaker 2: for the thing from Travis and we will we'll be
Speaker 2: right back with you. Hang on, folks, will be right back.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show. You're
Speaker 1: listening to the David night Show. Making sense common again.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, sorry for the interruption, but we're back with
Speaker 2: Gerald Slenty And there's a couple of other things I
Speaker 2: wanted to cover that are in today's newly released Trends
Speaker 2: Journal at Trendsjournal dot com. Robots not able to fill
Speaker 2: a worker shortage. So as a Chinese executive, this is
Speaker 2: one of the articles you've got. And this is kind
Speaker 2: of unusual because we're so used to seeing the hype
Speaker 2: from us AI executives that they can do everything and
Speaker 2: they can do it. Now they're actually down the expectations
Speaker 2: a little bit, aren't they yeah.
Speaker 5: Again, they're doing it, so you keep investing in their companies.
Speaker 5: That's why they keep doing it. And that's the same
Speaker 5: thing with the whole AI. But it's going to be
Speaker 5: the future, but it's not right now. Trends are born,
Speaker 5: they grow, they mature, reach old age, and die. The
Speaker 5: robotic trend is still an infancy, but it's going to
Speaker 5: be the future. And when you put the robots and
Speaker 5: the AI together, you're going to see a lot of
Speaker 5: jobs lost. And what happened when the beginning of the
Speaker 5: week you saw the equity markets on Monday really take
Speaker 5: a crash because of these new AI that's making a
Speaker 5: lot of software companies they don't need them anymore. And
Speaker 5: you saw a big, big drop in them. But then
Speaker 5: it came back up because well we're going to work together. No, no, no,
Speaker 5: it's going away. AI is the future again. You look
Speaker 5: at the data and how the kids in school they're
Speaker 5: all they're not learning anything anymore. They're all shotting it out. Yeah,
Speaker 5: it's the future. Love it, hate it, want it, don't
Speaker 5: want it. Another article that just came out, it was
Speaker 5: in the news about how young people aren't going out
Speaker 5: dancing anymore.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, they don't do anything. They stay at home
Speaker 2: and you know, interact with the computer. You know, while
Speaker 2: we're talking about the manufacturing stuff. And I said for
Speaker 2: the longest time, even going back to Trump's first administrations,
Speaker 2: that we're going to reshore manufacturing. I said, they're not
Speaker 2: going to reshore manufacturing until the robots are ready. And
Speaker 2: now we got Lutnik just the last couple of weeks
Speaker 2: basically saying the same thing. This is going to be great.
Speaker 2: We're going to have completely automated factories and all the
Speaker 2: rest of stuff. So it's like your manufacturing jobs are
Speaker 2: not going to be coming back. They're only going to
Speaker 2: bring back the manufacturing when they've got the robots that
Speaker 2: are going to be able to do this stuff, when
Speaker 2: they can replace people with this. And it's not just
Speaker 2: going to be theot robots walking around that are have
Speaker 2: two legs and two arms. They've got a lot of robots,
Speaker 2: for example at Amazon, and just like you see with
Speaker 2: the car companies, you know, robot arms that are there,
Speaker 2: or robots that are like rumbas that get underneath a
Speaker 2: shelving thing and pick it up and move it to
Speaker 2: another spot and go through and pick these shelves that's
Speaker 2: what they're going to be doing.
Speaker 5: And think about it. Think about the industrial revolution, how
Speaker 5: it began, and how it keeps getting and keeps getting
Speaker 5: more and more industrialized. So it's the future and it's
Speaker 5: gone again. You got to put all the trends together.
Speaker 5: Look at the gen Z is it one of our things?
Speaker 5: Is a gen Z revolution. They're overthrowing countries all around
Speaker 5: the world. And look what happened in New York City
Speaker 5: and the biggest city in America. They elected a guy
Speaker 5: that nobody ever heard of a year ago. This is
Speaker 5: Zorn Mundani. Wow. Come because gen Z has no jobs
Speaker 5: and this guy calls himself a democratic socialist. Don't worry
Speaker 5: about it. You don't have a job, Get free healthcare,
Speaker 5: free bus rides. We're gonna have government stores, grocery stores,
Speaker 5: one thing after another. We're not going to allow you
Speaker 5: to raise the rent. We're going to build more buildings
Speaker 5: so you can live in you know, more projects. There's
Speaker 5: no future for the young people. And that's why you're
Speaker 5: seeing this gen Z revolution. And it goes back to products.
Speaker 5: It's going to happen. It's just not there yet, but
Speaker 5: it's going to keep increasing.
Speaker 2: He's offering them jobs shoveling snow. Yeah, and their their
Speaker 2: controls are so lax. They got all these people laughing
Speaker 2: about it and putting it up on social media. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I just showed up, I got a shove. One just
Speaker 2: walked out here and I didn't do anything at all,
Speaker 2: just take the paycheck.
Speaker 5: And it's basically again, they have no future. The big zone.
Speaker 3: Everything that's right, that's right.
Speaker 5: When you and I were young, guys say that. I
Speaker 5: say this all the time, there were grocery stores, hardware stores,
Speaker 5: drug stores, shoes stores, clothing stores, fish stores. Now they
Speaker 5: were all chains. Again, it's not my language, the language
Speaker 5: of a guy by the name of Benito Mussolini. The
Speaker 5: merger of state and corporate power. This is called fascism.
Speaker 5: Welcome to America.
Speaker 2: And they can't compete against Wall Street because Wall Street
Speaker 2: has got essentially unlimited amounts of money available to them.
Speaker 2: Look at Moderna. They operated for ten years before Trump
Speaker 2: gave them the warp speed position. Gave them a lot
Speaker 2: of money to build their manufacturing stuff for it. But
Speaker 2: they never had a product. They always had happy stories,
Speaker 2: and they would put these stories out there and they'd
Speaker 2: pump and dump it on Wall Street. And make a
Speaker 2: lot of money. And for years we competed against Blockbuster
Speaker 2: the video stores, and they didn't have a product profit
Speaker 2: after they were bought by Paramount by oh So hos
Speaker 2: Holy Company had Paramount, it's some of the Redstone Viacom Blockbuster,
Speaker 2: and they never made a profit again after that. But
Speaker 2: they continued on like a zombie company for like fifteen
Speaker 2: years because they kept getting money from Wall Street. They
Speaker 2: didn't have to compete on Main Street. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, they could build additional stores. That's what they
Speaker 2: did where we were. They would pick one small mom
Speaker 2: and pop chain at a time, and they would put
Speaker 2: a store in front of every one of their stores
Speaker 2: until they drove them out of business. Then they'd pick
Speaker 2: another mom and pop and do that. And they were
Speaker 2: doing that as they were losing money left and right.
Speaker 2: But they were getting the money from Wall Street. It's
Speaker 2: like the Federal Reserve financing a bankrupt federal government. You say,
Speaker 2: it's almost impossible to compete against Wall Street and the
Speaker 2: big box retailers anymore.
Speaker 5: Yeah, again, it's fat. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: This is one of your covers of The Trench's Journal
Speaker 5: back in twenty and eleven.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 5: All right, Yeah, nothing's changed.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: Christ went into the temple. Who was here? Oh, City, Wells, Fogo, JP, Morgan, Chase,
Speaker 5: Goldvin Sachs. Again, they talk about the equity markets. The
Speaker 5: top one percent on fifty four percent of the equities,
Speaker 5: when you put the ten percent in the numbers will
Speaker 5: be around ninety two percent, which means ninety percent of we,
Speaker 5: the people of slave land, on eight percent of the
Speaker 5: equity markets.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. That's why it didn't matter to anybody
Speaker 2: when Pambondi tried to deflect from the Epstein things like,
Speaker 2: come on, guys, the dows at fifty thousand or whatever,
Speaker 2: It's like, who cares a lady? You know, we don't
Speaker 2: really care that you're talking to your donors. There, you're
Speaker 2: telling your donors, we'll keep protecting you from what from
Speaker 2: exposure with Epstein because the stock market is doing well,
Speaker 2: So stick with us.
Speaker 5: Oh, like to cover the magazine last week. If Epstein's
Speaker 5: name was Epsteino, Oh, it would be a different story. Oh,
Speaker 5: I wrote a mafia. Hey, look at a mafia. Do
Speaker 5: look what they're doing. Look what they're doing.
Speaker 6: All right, that's right. If it was name, if he
Speaker 6: was an Italian. Oh my god, Hey, but he's a
Speaker 6: Zionist cat. Yeah, all right, so shut up.
Speaker 2: That's right, working with the CIA, working with a sade,
Speaker 2: you know, that's that's your license to whatever.
Speaker 5: You When was Epsteino, all of this data would be released.
Speaker 5: That they're holding back this data is disgusting. It's a disgrace.
Speaker 2: It is it is well. One thing that we've seen
Speaker 2: this last week as well, we didn't have much time
Speaker 2: to touch on. It is the total betrayal of this
Speaker 2: idea They're going to make America healthy again. That bit
Speaker 2: the dust big time with not only compelling, you know,
Speaker 2: an order from Trump saying we're going to ramp up
Speaker 2: the production of glafid and we're going to give them
Speaker 2: liability protection by bringing in a Defense Production Act. That's there,
Speaker 2: total betrayal of what he promised people, as well as
Speaker 2: the fact that Trump administration's fishing back against Florian. But
Speaker 2: you've got an article about how high exposure to ultra
Speaker 2: processed foods in early years can make your child dumb.
Speaker 2: Talk about that's another one of these things like fluoride, right,
Speaker 2: the chemicals and these things.
Speaker 5: Again, look a look at you know, there used to
Speaker 5: be a song by Fats Domino. They called me, they
Speaker 5: called me the fat man cause I weigh to one
Speaker 5: hundred pounds. Yeah, it was nineteen forty nine. I looked
Speaker 5: it up. The average weight of men back in nineteen
Speaker 5: forty nine was one hundred and fifty five pounds. Now
Speaker 5: the average weight is two hundred and six pounds. Wow,
Speaker 5: and you're talking about how it affects your brain. This
Speaker 5: is this is how it in our trends journal this week. Uh,
Speaker 5: this is how it again. It went out last night. Tonight,
Speaker 5: President Trump will deliver his State of the Union address
Speaker 5: at the US Capital. According to new Ruters IPSIS poll,
Speaker 5: sixty one percent of Americans say that Trump has quote
Speaker 5: become erratic with age, which means essentially he's out of
Speaker 5: his mind.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it has nothing to do with being erratic with age.
Speaker 5: I'm the same age as Trump. The older you get
Speaker 5: and if you keep on learning, the smartie you get,
Speaker 5: it's because he eats crap food. Look at him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know he's teasing all this stuff about the
Speaker 2: UFO thing. And somebody did an AI joke video showed
Speaker 2: this UFO guy on the lawn of the White House
Speaker 2: and goes in Now, Trump is sitting there with him
Speaker 2: in the Oval office, and he introduces him as an
Speaker 2: extra cholesterol as the two of them are eating McDonald's.
Speaker 2: Well that's all the time we got for today. Thank
Speaker 2: you so much for joining us. Gerald and again. The
Speaker 2: new Trends Journal out today and you can save ten
Speaker 2: percent off of it. Get it for two dollars and
Speaker 2: fifteen cents a week, a tremendous amount of information. That's
Speaker 2: a trends general. Thank you so much, Cheryl, have a
Speaker 2: good day.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 2: The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common Past to track and control us.
Speaker 2: They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God.
Speaker 5: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening. Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com