WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.520 --> 00:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, just like the tech issues that we recently had

2
00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>where our entire systems shorted. Sorry about that. Sometimes confusion

3
00:00:07.480 --> 00:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>comes into our lives. We often don't understand the reason

4
00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>why we live. We don't as to the purpose of

5
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:14.679
<v Speaker 1>our existence, and we're trying to find out exactly what

6
00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it is we're supposed to be doing here. Now, many

7
00:00:17.359 --> 00:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Americans have decided that, you know, the way that we

8
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>find out who God is and what our purpose is

9
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:24.679
<v Speaker 1>is through Christianity. But when you approach Christianity, it's not

10
00:00:24.719 --> 00:00:27.239
<v Speaker 1>as simple as you think. Sometimes you look around you

11
00:00:27.280 --> 00:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as Protestants, there's in there, there's Evangelicals, there's the mainline denominations.

12
00:00:32.560 --> 00:00:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Then you go out and then there's Orthodox, there's Catholic.

13
00:00:36.399 --> 00:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>But if you notice today with the gay flags in

14
00:00:38.159 --> 00:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>front of churches and the pastrixes, the female pastors, and

15
00:00:41.479 --> 00:00:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the weird ideology, a lot of young people are finding

16
00:00:44.119 --> 00:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>out that the modern church perhaps may not be the

17
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:51.799
<v Speaker 1>best version of Christ's Holy Church. In fact, maybe just

18
00:00:51.880 --> 00:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe the people of the past knew a little more

19
00:00:53.880 --> 00:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>than we did. When looking back in history myself, I

20
00:00:56.759 --> 00:00:59.679
<v Speaker 1>found there's two churches. There's the Catholic Church, we'll call

21
00:00:59.719 --> 00:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it in General and the Orthodox Church. They both claim

22
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the true church. One follows the papacy, it

23
00:01:05.480 --> 00:01:07.719
<v Speaker 1>looks like the other one doesn't. And yet at the

24
00:01:07.719 --> 00:01:10.159
<v Speaker 1>same time, when you ask either of them, really, where

25
00:01:10.200 --> 00:01:11.719
<v Speaker 1>should I go to church? They'll say, well, most of

26
00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>them you should go to Catholic, but you know you

27
00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>can go to Orthodox if it has an Orthodox to

28
00:01:16.239 --> 00:01:18.519
<v Speaker 1>say you can, but Catholic, but you should go to Orthodox.

29
00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So why do we have both? Then? Which one is true?

30
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Which one is the way to be a part of

31
00:01:23.480 --> 00:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Christ's eternal body, to be a part of the living,

32
00:01:26.799 --> 00:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>breathing unit of Christ. Joining me today to discuss the

33
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>true Church, whether it's Orthodox or Catholicism. We are talking

34
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to experts in their field. Jaydyer. He's a podcast host,

35
00:01:37.519 --> 00:01:40.239
<v Speaker 1>author of many books, an avid reader. Jay Dyer, welcome

36
00:01:40.239 --> 00:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the show. Let us know who you are.

37
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:44.079
<v Speaker 1>For those that are just joining for the first time.

38
00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:45.439
<v Speaker 1>You want to explain a little bit about what it

39
00:01:45.439 --> 00:01:47.879
<v Speaker 1>means to be an Orthodox or what that even you

40
00:01:47.879 --> 00:01:50.319
<v Speaker 1>know defines itself as in a little bit about where

41
00:01:50.319 --> 00:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>people can find your podcast.

42
00:01:51.959 --> 00:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Jay Dyer, I have been Orthodox since about twenty seventeen,

43
00:01:56.239 --> 00:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and prior to that was Roman Catholic from many years,

44
00:01:59.000 --> 00:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>pretty dedicated Latin mass go or was raised Protestant in

45
00:02:02.439 --> 00:02:08.759
<v Speaker 3>the Reformed Baptist and Reform tradition. And yeah, I would

46
00:02:08.759 --> 00:02:11.759
<v Speaker 3>say that what Orthodox Christianity is is we believe it

47
00:02:11.840 --> 00:02:15.919
<v Speaker 3>is the Church of the first millennium, still preserved and

48
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>still holding to those synodal traditions that are essentially found

49
00:02:22.080 --> 00:02:26.479
<v Speaker 3>within any of the canonical Orthodox churches throughout the world.

50
00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:30.000
<v Speaker 3>So we think it is the church that Christ established.

51
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:32.919
<v Speaker 3>We think that it doesn't change. There might be political

52
00:02:33.000 --> 00:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical issues that happened, but the fundamental constitution and beliefs

53
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:38.639
<v Speaker 3>of the Church do not change. And so we take

54
00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:42.159
<v Speaker 3>truth to be the most important category over things like

55
00:02:42.280 --> 00:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>numbers and things like that. And me personally, you can

56
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:48.319
<v Speaker 3>find me at Jays Analysis dot com and a fourth

57
00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:50.039
<v Speaker 3>hour host of the Alex Jones Show for the last

58
00:02:50.039 --> 00:02:51.919
<v Speaker 3>five or six years, and I write for the Sam

59
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Hid Show.

60
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, jack of all trades and also an incredible guy

61
00:02:55.360 --> 00:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. He's the real deal, by the way.

62
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:00.479
<v Speaker 1>And joining me to represent Catholicism, we'll find out a

63
00:03:00.479 --> 00:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>lot about it. Timothy Gordon's also podcast host, pretty influential

64
00:03:03.960 --> 00:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in this field and all around.

65
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, you consider yourself a theologian. Correct? Awesome, you

66
00:03:10.280 --> 00:03:13.719
<v Speaker 2>hear me? Yeah, there we go for a second. All right,

67
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm a tomistic philosopher, trained trained graduate philosophy, but but

68
00:03:18.919 --> 00:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I taught theology for many, many years. And yeah, the

69
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Roman Catholic Church is the center piece of of what

70
00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:32.479
<v Speaker 2>I do. Uh, physics, metaphysics, ethics, politics, That's what my

71
00:03:32.719 --> 00:03:36.879
<v Speaker 2>podcast is on. Rules for Introgrades is the name, and

72
00:03:37.479 --> 00:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I try to clarify. I try to clarify the issues

73
00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:45.199
<v Speaker 2>because the Catholic Church receives so much attention. There's so

74
00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>much mis and disinformation out there. A lot of it's

75
00:03:49.400 --> 00:03:52.639
<v Speaker 2>genuinely confusing to people, and it's a big tent. We

76
00:03:52.759 --> 00:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>have orthodoxy that always has to be separated from the

77
00:03:56.199 --> 00:04:02.919
<v Speaker 2>chaef of heterodoxy, and there's been some confusion. Some of

78
00:04:02.919 --> 00:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>it is legitimate confusion, and some of it is confusion

79
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:10.439
<v Speaker 2>that has been stoked by media and opponents of the church.

80
00:04:10.479 --> 00:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of it's been legitimate in the last

81
00:04:12.879 --> 00:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>sixty years. So I try to be a voice of clarity,

82
00:04:16.600 --> 00:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a lay voice of clarity, and that's what I do

83
00:04:19.639 --> 00:04:23.959
<v Speaker 2>on my podcast, The Rules for Introgrades. Timothy Gordon awesome.

84
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll be talking a little bit about their podcast later

85
00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:28.079
<v Speaker 1>on and the rules in just a few moments. My

86
00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:31.399
<v Speaker 1>name's Elijah Schaeffer and it's approximately seven forty five pm

87
00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Eastern time in the United States. We are usually live

88
00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:36.519
<v Speaker 1>right now Monday, Wednesday, Friday at seven pm Eastern time.

89
00:04:36.639 --> 00:04:39.319
<v Speaker 1>We usually don't have our production booth blow up in

90
00:04:39.319 --> 00:04:41.079
<v Speaker 1>the middle of things. But if you want to know this,

91
00:04:41.399 --> 00:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we can do what we should always do and we'll

92
00:04:43.160 --> 00:04:45.079
<v Speaker 1>just blame the Jews. Now, I'm totally kid, that's not

93
00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to do. Thank you guys for joining me.

94
00:04:47.639 --> 00:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Are going to be reading the super chats periodically throughout,

95
00:04:49.720 --> 00:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>so you send them in. I see Rachel Wilson's in

96
00:04:51.839 --> 00:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>there for twenty dollars saying to you guys, much love

97
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to Tim and Jay, much love to Alive for hosting.

98
00:04:55.959 --> 00:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>America will become Orthodox, America will become holy? Will it?

99
00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 2>I go about that and so much more.

100
00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:03.519
<v Speaker 1>Here another episode of The Riff Live right now, Let's

101
00:05:03.519 --> 00:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>start the show.

102
00:05:22.959 --> 00:05:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Rift. You can find us at

103
00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>riftv dot com.

104
00:05:25.720 --> 00:05:29.199
<v Speaker 1>New articles every single day on culture, politics, and religion.

105
00:05:29.399 --> 00:05:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Also us a litt announcement for your joining us for

106
00:05:31.079 --> 00:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the first time. This is a new network, it just

107
00:05:32.639 --> 00:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>launched a few weeks ago, and this is one of

108
00:05:34.600 --> 00:05:36.199
<v Speaker 1>our shows, so we're hammering out some of the details.

109
00:05:36.240 --> 00:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>We have a couple of new shows launching, including Joel Webbin,

110
00:05:39.439 --> 00:05:41.639
<v Speaker 1>who is a Protestant that is coming on and doing

111
00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a new show for our network. We're very excited about that. Plus,

112
00:05:44.720 --> 00:05:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Stock has a new channel. If you don't know,

113
00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's Sarah Stock on YouTube. She's also launching a new program.

114
00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And we also have a new White House show with

115
00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the Gateway Pun and Jordan Conradson. We're launching on September fifteenth,

116
00:05:56.240 --> 00:05:58.639
<v Speaker 1>So God is good. We got our security clearances for

117
00:05:58.680 --> 00:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the White House and we're very happy to be here anyway.

118
00:06:01.839 --> 00:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Joining us today are my guests Timothy Gordon and Jay Dyer.

119
00:06:04.879 --> 00:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>They're both infamous, i should say, in their own right,

120
00:06:07.560 --> 00:06:10.319
<v Speaker 1>and have both come on the show previously to discuss

121
00:06:10.519 --> 00:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be Orthodox, what it means to

122
00:06:12.279 --> 00:06:14.399
<v Speaker 1>be a Catholic, and so if you want to watch

123
00:06:14.399 --> 00:06:15.879
<v Speaker 1>those episodes, you can go back. You can type in

124
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>their names and you can find them. They're very, very

125
00:06:17.480 --> 00:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>very good, very developed individuals and thinkers. Let's go in

126
00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about what we're gonna be doing. So

127
00:06:22.480 --> 00:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be mainly talk covering three topics today. One

128
00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>topic is going to be whether Christ did or did

129
00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not establish a visible head of church. We're talking about

130
00:06:30.720 --> 00:06:34.399
<v Speaker 1>apostolic succession in its own way, what really defines the church?

131
00:06:34.439 --> 00:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Orthodox and Catholic disagree on that. Plus

132
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:39.959
<v Speaker 1>topic two, we're gonna be talking about the Holy Spirit

133
00:06:40.040 --> 00:06:43.959
<v Speaker 1>does or does not hypostatically proceed from the Sun, So

134
00:06:44.079 --> 00:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna kind of talk about the Trinity, talk about.

135
00:06:45.839 --> 00:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>What's going on there.

136
00:06:47.000 --> 00:06:49.319
<v Speaker 1>This is a very interesting topic, especially for me background

137
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and Protestantism. And number three, we're talking about the Divine

138
00:06:52.199 --> 00:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>essence is or is not absolutely simple and for the

139
00:06:54.399 --> 00:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>affirmative position not composed of any parts or potencies. Now,

140
00:06:57.879 --> 00:06:59.639
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of these topics will have a normal

141
00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:01.759
<v Speaker 1>struct Sure, there will be an opening statement, there will

142
00:07:01.800 --> 00:07:03.959
<v Speaker 1>be a rebuttal, there will be a cross examination and

143
00:07:03.959 --> 00:07:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a closing.

144
00:07:04.439 --> 00:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a very formal debate.

145
00:07:05.839 --> 00:07:07.639
<v Speaker 1>So if you're not familiar with that style on this channel,

146
00:07:07.879 --> 00:07:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we're trying it for the first time today. Because these

147
00:07:09.439 --> 00:07:12.639
<v Speaker 1>are academics, they are not retarded like myself. But in

148
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the middle of these topics, we will have a little

149
00:07:14.399 --> 00:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a break, so these will be a little

150
00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>bit lengthy might want to take out notes, and we

151
00:07:19.120 --> 00:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>will also be asking a few other questions more relevant

152
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:24.079
<v Speaker 1>to the culture and topics and what their responses are

153
00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as the Catholic and the Orthodox church. All right, Jay,

154
00:07:27.720 --> 00:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll start with you with your opening statement. Our topic

155
00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>number one that we are discussing whether Christ did or

156
00:07:32.920 --> 00:07:35.199
<v Speaker 1>did not establish a visible head of church. We're talking

157
00:07:35.240 --> 00:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe the correct phrase apostolic succession.

158
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 2>I know you guys believe in the I know you

159
00:07:40.560 --> 00:07:43.120
<v Speaker 2>guys believe in in uh they believe in in the

160
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:44.879
<v Speaker 2>in the papacy, right, and you don't correct?

161
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:50.279
<v Speaker 3>We agreed on divine divine simplicity or act as purists?

162
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>First? Okay, out here a right that I have.

163
00:07:54.040 --> 00:07:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I have the opposite on my on my, on my,

164
00:07:56.240 --> 00:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to that. So you said, uh, we'll start

165
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:00.639
<v Speaker 1>with the we have as topic three, but we'll we'll

166
00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:01.879
<v Speaker 1>go to that one second.

167
00:08:01.720 --> 00:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Or you have one second or third? Which one the

168
00:08:05.240 --> 00:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>visible head of church? It's all over here, so I

169
00:08:08.279 --> 00:08:09.279
<v Speaker 2>just have this one. All right, let's go.

170
00:08:09.800 --> 00:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to topic we'll change topic three the topic

171
00:08:11.759 --> 00:08:13.759
<v Speaker 1>one here. Let's all the divine essence is or is

172
00:08:13.800 --> 00:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>not absolutely simple. Go ahead your opening statement, right.

173
00:08:17.759 --> 00:08:22.279
<v Speaker 3>So, if I look at scholastic dictionaries from Roman Catholic texts,

174
00:08:22.279 --> 00:08:27.319
<v Speaker 3>we see that for God or for philosopher, Scholastic philosophy

175
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>in general, pure act is defined as simple for perfection

176
00:08:30.879 --> 00:08:33.879
<v Speaker 3>without any imperfection. It is free from any potency in

177
00:08:33.879 --> 00:08:38.159
<v Speaker 3>the strictest sense. It is therefore unqualified perfection of existence,

178
00:08:38.679 --> 00:08:43.639
<v Speaker 3>without any passive or limited potency. And this is from

179
00:08:43.679 --> 00:08:48.440
<v Speaker 3>the dictionary Scholastic Philosophy. Aquitta says something very similar, and

180
00:08:48.519 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 3>as does Etenial Sown the student rehive me the one

181
00:08:52.279 --> 00:08:55.240
<v Speaker 3>of the premier tomas of the last century. In defining

182
00:08:55.279 --> 00:08:58.840
<v Speaker 3>who God is, there is this beginning point that comes

183
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:03.559
<v Speaker 3>from Hellenic metaph physics. We would not, as Orthodox, necessarily

184
00:09:03.600 --> 00:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>agree with every you disagree with every usage of the

185
00:09:07.399 --> 00:09:10.440
<v Speaker 3>word your act. But what we would say is that

186
00:09:10.519 --> 00:09:12.759
<v Speaker 3>when I look at that definition and I compare it

187
00:09:12.799 --> 00:09:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to the teaching of say same Maximus the Confessor in

188
00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:17.440
<v Speaker 3>his famous two inter chapters, he begins to work by

189
00:09:17.480 --> 00:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>saying that God is not in himself as in as

190
00:09:21.720 --> 00:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>far as it is possible for us to know any

191
00:09:23.840 --> 00:09:26.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of first principle. Nor is he in an intermediate state,

192
00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:29.279
<v Speaker 3>nor is he in an end, nor is he any other concept.

193
00:09:29.399 --> 00:09:32.679
<v Speaker 3>For he is indefinite, immobile, and infinite, since he is

194
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:38.600
<v Speaker 3>infinitely beyond any substance, any potentiality, and any actuality. So

195
00:09:38.799 --> 00:09:41.200
<v Speaker 3>notice there he is not pure act in himself. He

196
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is not actuality in himself. He goes on to say

197
00:09:44.360 --> 00:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>in section four, God is not therefore a potentiality, nor

198
00:09:47.559 --> 00:09:50.000
<v Speaker 3>is he a first principle, nor is he an actuality, nor.

199
00:09:49.879 --> 00:09:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Is he a first cause.

200
00:09:51.799 --> 00:09:55.039
<v Speaker 3>And he's citing from Aristoitilian categories and definitions.

201
00:09:55.039 --> 00:09:58.039
<v Speaker 2>There he goes on to say, though, that in another sense,

202
00:09:58.080 --> 00:09:58.639
<v Speaker 2>we can.

203
00:09:58.519 --> 00:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>Call God these things. And the reason for this is

204
00:10:01.720 --> 00:10:05.919
<v Speaker 3>that for Orthodoxeology there's two very crucial key distinctions, or

205
00:10:06.000 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a name, the ways that we that we name God

206
00:10:08.759 --> 00:10:10.639
<v Speaker 3>that are distinct. We name God first in terms of

207
00:10:10.639 --> 00:10:14.679
<v Speaker 3>the intraternitarian life, or God in himself, and in that

208
00:10:14.759 --> 00:10:18.159
<v Speaker 3>way we do not positively predicate of the divine essence.

209
00:10:18.559 --> 00:10:20.399
<v Speaker 3>So even though tim will agree with me that there

210
00:10:20.440 --> 00:10:23.720
<v Speaker 3>is a via negativa, Orthodoxeology has a different conception of

211
00:10:23.720 --> 00:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>what apathetic theology is so when we speak of the

212
00:10:26.120 --> 00:10:29.039
<v Speaker 3>divine essence, we do not speak of it as identical

213
00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to anything much less identical to pure act, first act act.

214
00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 2>As purists, et cetera.

215
00:10:35.759 --> 00:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>The divine essence is unknowable, imparticipable, unapproachable, and it is therefore,

216
00:10:41.399 --> 00:10:43.159
<v Speaker 3>strictly speaking apathetic.

217
00:10:43.639 --> 00:10:44.919
<v Speaker 2>How do we know God? Then?

218
00:10:45.159 --> 00:10:47.840
<v Speaker 3>If God is apapatic in this sense, well he's not

219
00:10:47.960 --> 00:10:51.679
<v Speaker 3>only essence. God is also person and the Saint John

220
00:10:51.759 --> 00:10:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Damascus says multiple times in on the Orthodox Faith, the

221
00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 3>key to all heresies is to confuse the distinction between

222
00:10:58.559 --> 00:11:02.080
<v Speaker 3>nature and person. The Orthodox Church, that distinction is as

223
00:11:02.360 --> 00:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>quote real or as strong as the distinction between the

224
00:11:06.799 --> 00:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>persons themselves. So while in Tim's philosophy he would agree

225
00:11:10.519 --> 00:11:12.840
<v Speaker 3>agree that the Father and the Son are really distinct,

226
00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.679
<v Speaker 3>that real distinction is somehow not applicable to anything else

227
00:11:16.720 --> 00:11:20.559
<v Speaker 3>in the triad, be it God's attributes, operations, or the

228
00:11:20.600 --> 00:11:23.080
<v Speaker 3>distinction between nature and person itself, which is conceived of

229
00:11:23.159 --> 00:11:26.879
<v Speaker 3>as only mental or volitional intmistic philosophy. And I would

230
00:11:26.919 --> 00:11:29.480
<v Speaker 3>argue that in Roman Catholic theology that holds as well,

231
00:11:29.519 --> 00:11:33.519
<v Speaker 3>because the fourth latter in council accepts the Peter Lombard

232
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>definition of what simplicity is known as identity thesis. This

233
00:11:36.399 --> 00:11:39.039
<v Speaker 3>is denzing or four thirty two that person and essence

234
00:11:39.080 --> 00:11:43.399
<v Speaker 3>are essentially identical, but they're only mentally or rationally distinct.

235
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Thus God is his essence. So notice for them, God

236
00:11:47.240 --> 00:11:50.159
<v Speaker 3>is first and foremost essence. But the Orthodox position is

237
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:52.840
<v Speaker 3>very different. And Maximus goes on to describe the way

238
00:11:52.840 --> 00:11:57.159
<v Speaker 3>that we do speak of God in positive catavatic categories,

239
00:11:57.159 --> 00:12:00.559
<v Speaker 3>and that is because the energies are positive and known

240
00:12:00.600 --> 00:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to us. Those energies are his operations.

241
00:12:02.879 --> 00:12:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Where does this come from?

242
00:12:03.840 --> 00:12:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Is this something that the medieval Byzantines made up? They

243
00:12:07.519 --> 00:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>just came up with this idea that energies are these

244
00:12:10.120 --> 00:12:12.399
<v Speaker 3>things that God has that are other than him, and

245
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:15.159
<v Speaker 3>they are these other deities, these polytheistic parts of God.

246
00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:18.039
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not. In fact, we would argue that the only

247
00:12:18.080 --> 00:12:21.840
<v Speaker 3>way to have divine simplicity consistently is to adhere to

248
00:12:22.039 --> 00:12:25.919
<v Speaker 3>the divine simplicity of God. Yes, but also that his

249
00:12:26.039 --> 00:12:30.200
<v Speaker 3>operations are really there and really different from him. How

250
00:12:30.200 --> 00:12:33.519
<v Speaker 3>do I know that? The Coppadition's made a plastic analogy

251
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:35.720
<v Speaker 3>for how this is the case by looking at the

252
00:12:35.759 --> 00:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>difference between a man is nature and the work of

253
00:12:39.720 --> 00:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>nature and the product of nature. Allow me to quote

254
00:12:42.840 --> 00:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Saint John Damascus briefly here for that specific distinction. John

255
00:12:47.519 --> 00:12:52.559
<v Speaker 3>Damascus says that observe that energy, capacity of energy, and

256
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:55.399
<v Speaker 3>product of energy and the agent of the energy are

257
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>all different. Or the Orthodox Church we call these things

258
00:12:58.159 --> 00:13:01.519
<v Speaker 3>the difference between nature, person will, essence and operation or

259
00:13:01.639 --> 00:13:04.240
<v Speaker 3>energy and the effect of that energy. Energy is the

260
00:13:04.679 --> 00:13:08.279
<v Speaker 3>efficient and essential activity of the nature. So notice that's

261
00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the first statement from John Damascus. The same statement is

262
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>made by Saint Gregory. Excuse me, Saint Maximus in his

263
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:21.639
<v Speaker 3>at the Lassios sixty three he says that God's supernatural

264
00:13:21.759 --> 00:13:24.879
<v Speaker 3>energy is the identical energy that the Father of the

265
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Son and the Spirit possess. That also the saints are

266
00:13:28.559 --> 00:13:32.440
<v Speaker 3>deified by Saint Gregora Nissa says, and against Unumias two,

267
00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the common nature is identified by common energy. Saint Grege

268
00:13:36.919 --> 00:13:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Nissa says again, the essential invisible God becomes visible by

269
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>his energies. He is not visible in his essence, but

270
00:13:44.639 --> 00:13:47.360
<v Speaker 3>in some of his operations, And to quote Saint Cyril

271
00:13:47.399 --> 00:13:50.480
<v Speaker 3>of Alexandria, things with the same energy are acknowledged to

272
00:13:50.519 --> 00:13:53.759
<v Speaker 3>be of the same essence. So energy proceeds from essence

273
00:13:53.799 --> 00:13:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and is the proper signifier in work or operation of

274
00:13:57.360 --> 00:14:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that nature or essence. Now, natures don't operate. Eight persons

275
00:14:01.279 --> 00:14:03.960
<v Speaker 3>with nature's operate. And this is why for John Damascus

276
00:14:04.360 --> 00:14:08.440
<v Speaker 3>in Book three, section fifteen, there are two wills, two energies,

277
00:14:08.519 --> 00:14:11.960
<v Speaker 3>but one divine hypostasis working in and through those two wills,

278
00:14:11.960 --> 00:14:14.799
<v Speaker 3>and those two energies now to shift out of the

279
00:14:14.840 --> 00:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>philosophical definitions and statements that we have. And I would

280
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>add that definition, by the way, is accepted at the

281
00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:24.519
<v Speaker 3>six Ecumenical Council, where the Confession of Saint Sophronius, pulling

282
00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:27.600
<v Speaker 3>from the explicit teachings of Saint Maximus the Confessor on

283
00:14:27.720 --> 00:14:30.279
<v Speaker 3>essence and energy, two wills, two operations, and by the way,

284
00:14:30.360 --> 00:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>many energies, to cite John Damascus in book one, that

285
00:14:33.759 --> 00:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>is accepted at the six Ecumenical Council as the teaching's

286
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>crystological definition. Again it's called the Confession of Saint Sophronius.

287
00:14:41.519 --> 00:14:45.159
<v Speaker 3>You can find the Oxford text available on Amazon. Thus,

288
00:14:45.320 --> 00:14:48.159
<v Speaker 3>even in the patristic teaching of the Roman Catholic Church,

289
00:14:48.200 --> 00:14:51.639
<v Speaker 3>three minutes from the early few centuries achieved from the

290
00:14:51.639 --> 00:14:55.159
<v Speaker 3>early seventh centuries. In six eighty six to Me sixt

291
00:14:55.159 --> 00:14:58.320
<v Speaker 3>eighty one, at the six Secumenical Council, we have the

292
00:14:58.559 --> 00:15:03.759
<v Speaker 3>affirmation of the teaching of Saint Sophronius and Saint Maximus

293
00:15:04.000 --> 00:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>that John of Damascus encapsulates in his later text of

294
00:15:07.759 --> 00:15:10.759
<v Speaker 3>on the Orthodox Face, reflecting on the essence synergy sanction,

295
00:15:10.799 --> 00:15:13.759
<v Speaker 3>which is seen most clearly in Believe it or not,

296
00:15:13.759 --> 00:15:17.879
<v Speaker 3>not triadic speculations, but in Christology. In other words, it

297
00:15:17.919 --> 00:15:21.159
<v Speaker 3>is the uncreated energies that Saint Ceerl says, deify us

298
00:15:21.360 --> 00:15:23.919
<v Speaker 3>in this life through feeding.

299
00:15:23.559 --> 00:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>On the flesh.

300
00:15:25.080 --> 00:15:27.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be interested to hear how a person

301
00:15:27.200 --> 00:15:30.240
<v Speaker 3>who believes in the real presence, that is the body

302
00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:34.039
<v Speaker 3>bloatsole in divinity, president of Christ in the Eucharist, as

303
00:15:34.039 --> 00:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the Roe Mecallity Church claims to confess how this is

304
00:15:36.399 --> 00:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>possible given that in the Orthodox conception, it's only possible

305
00:15:39.759 --> 00:15:42.360
<v Speaker 3>given that the uncreated energies, as Saint Ceerl says in

306
00:15:42.399 --> 00:15:45.279
<v Speaker 3>the two Letters to exth Census, deify the flesh and

307
00:15:45.320 --> 00:15:47.639
<v Speaker 3>thus make it the thing that we participate in to

308
00:15:47.799 --> 00:15:50.519
<v Speaker 3>be deified. He says in the two Letters to Sixtensus

309
00:15:50.559 --> 00:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and this is reflected and then teaching the Council of Ephesis,

310
00:15:52.519 --> 00:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>by the way in the anathemas, that we do not

311
00:15:55.159 --> 00:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>eat the flesh and blood of some man, but the

312
00:15:57.480 --> 00:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>deified flesh of the God Man, made divine, not by

313
00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the divine essence, but by his uncreated energy and immortality.

314
00:16:05.600 --> 00:16:07.399
<v Speaker 2>So Saint Cyril of Alexandria.

315
00:16:07.519 --> 00:16:10.399
<v Speaker 3>The fourth act, the third Actumenical Council of Ephesis is

316
00:16:10.399 --> 00:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>pretty explicit when we get into the actual teachings of

317
00:16:13.720 --> 00:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>how we participate in divine life. On the other hand,

318
00:16:17.159 --> 00:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Roman Catholic Church, if I read from the

319
00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>teaching of Ludwig ott Louis, God says that them the

320
00:16:27.039 --> 00:16:29.679
<v Speaker 3>grace that we receive in the Roman Catholic Church and

321
00:16:29.720 --> 00:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>theirs and their and their belief sanctifying grace is a created,

322
00:16:33.360 --> 00:16:37.360
<v Speaker 3>supernatural gift, really distinct from God. In other words, the

323
00:16:37.480 --> 00:16:39.679
<v Speaker 3>very thing that you are participating in, which by the way,

324
00:16:39.799 --> 00:16:43.240
<v Speaker 3>point number one says is a creation. Point number five says,

325
00:16:43.679 --> 00:16:46.919
<v Speaker 3>is a participation in the divine nature. I'm pretty sure

326
00:16:46.960 --> 00:16:49.159
<v Speaker 3>the divine nature isn't a creature. So I don't know

327
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:51.799
<v Speaker 3>how we participate in God. If the thing that we're

328
00:16:51.799 --> 00:16:56.399
<v Speaker 3>participating in is a quote quote created gift really different

329
00:16:56.480 --> 00:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>from God again quotes from a famous Roman Catholic agmatic manual. Lastly,

330
00:17:02.120 --> 00:17:04.279
<v Speaker 3>I would say that there are a couple more examples

331
00:17:04.680 --> 00:17:07.799
<v Speaker 3>that I think are very difficult for people who deny

332
00:17:07.880 --> 00:17:11.640
<v Speaker 3>this distinction, particularly when it comes to what are called Theophanes.

333
00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:14.039
<v Speaker 3>The often these are manifestations of God in the Old Testament.

334
00:17:14.079 --> 00:17:16.359
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you a few that I think are really problematic.

335
00:17:16.880 --> 00:17:19.799
<v Speaker 3>How much time to have one? You can have it,

336
00:17:19.799 --> 00:17:21.759
<v Speaker 3>you can have. Got a couple more.

337
00:17:21.880 --> 00:17:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I got a couple more examples, and then I'll be done. So.

338
00:17:24.799 --> 00:17:29.039
<v Speaker 2>In number twelve we read that the Lord said to Moses, Aaron,

339
00:17:29.039 --> 00:17:32.319
<v Speaker 2>and Miriam, come you three to the tabernacle of meeting.

340
00:17:32.519 --> 00:17:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And they came out. The Lord came down in the

341
00:17:34.920 --> 00:17:37.839
<v Speaker 2>pillar and in the cloud, and he stood in the

342
00:17:37.839 --> 00:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>door of the tabernacle and called out to Aaron and Miriam.

343
00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Now noticed that we have this day authentic manifestation in

344
00:17:43.960 --> 00:17:46.799
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament where God comes down and specifically said

345
00:17:46.839 --> 00:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to stand there. When we go back to the situation

346
00:17:50.079 --> 00:17:55.240
<v Speaker 3>in Genesis. In Genesis thirty one, we read that the

347
00:17:55.240 --> 00:17:57.599
<v Speaker 3>Angel of the Lord, who identifies himself as the I

348
00:17:57.680 --> 00:18:01.000
<v Speaker 3>am the God who appeared to you at Bethel is

349
00:18:01.039 --> 00:18:03.599
<v Speaker 3>there talking to Jacob. And that same I Am that

350
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:07.119
<v Speaker 3>appears in time and space is also talking to Jacob

351
00:18:07.160 --> 00:18:09.279
<v Speaker 3>and calls himself the form of God. This is out

352
00:18:09.279 --> 00:18:11.799
<v Speaker 3>of the subtuision text. The form of God was seen

353
00:18:11.839 --> 00:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>by Jacob. And then we have another statement that it

354
00:18:14.240 --> 00:18:17.759
<v Speaker 3>is the Im that he wrestles with, because Jesus at

355
00:18:17.759 --> 00:18:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the end of John one says that he is.

356
00:18:20.480 --> 00:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>The gate the doorway.

357
00:18:22.279 --> 00:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>To have the ladder of Jacob and the angels descending

358
00:18:25.519 --> 00:18:27.799
<v Speaker 3>and descending on the Son of Man signifies and shows

359
00:18:27.839 --> 00:18:31.599
<v Speaker 3>that he was the one wrestling with Jacob. Jacob wrestled

360
00:18:31.599 --> 00:18:34.440
<v Speaker 3>with an actual form or being in time and space

361
00:18:35.200 --> 00:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that manifested in an energetic manifestation, as the Church has

362
00:18:38.519 --> 00:18:41.640
<v Speaker 3>always taught. But after Tomism and after the Middle Ages,

363
00:18:41.680 --> 00:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Cacolic Church moved away from this and decided

364
00:18:44.480 --> 00:18:50.559
<v Speaker 3>and said that these manifestations are rather created images, holograms, angels,

365
00:18:50.559 --> 00:18:53.079
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, whatever imagery you want to use, they're not

366
00:18:53.200 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the uncreated energies of God in time and space. Why well,

367
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>because of divine simplicity, it's not possible for God to

368
00:18:59.279 --> 00:19:01.759
<v Speaker 3>be present in time and space in these ways, because

369
00:19:01.839 --> 00:19:04.720
<v Speaker 3>God would then undergo change. But I want to remind

370
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:08.039
<v Speaker 3>them as I close in this point, that this theoteny

371
00:19:08.160 --> 00:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>argument is actually the basis and the predication, the presupposition

372
00:19:12.079 --> 00:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>for the doctrine of the incarnation. It is not the

373
00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:18.640
<v Speaker 3>divine Essence that became incarnate. It is this second person who,

374
00:19:18.720 --> 00:19:23.759
<v Speaker 3>according to Philippians too willfully limited himself to step into

375
00:19:23.799 --> 00:19:25.839
<v Speaker 3>time and space in a mode of being that the

376
00:19:25.880 --> 00:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Father and the Son did not enter into. So the

377
00:19:28.400 --> 00:19:32.039
<v Speaker 3>reductionist act as purest position will undercut not just the

378
00:19:32.039 --> 00:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>ofphanies and the real manifestations of the glory of God

379
00:19:34.680 --> 00:19:35.279
<v Speaker 3>in time and space.

380
00:19:35.279 --> 00:19:36.440
<v Speaker 2>The Leviticus nine says.

381
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:38.599
<v Speaker 3>This is the glory of God that appeared God's glories

382
00:19:38.640 --> 00:19:42.880
<v Speaker 3>under creature John seventeen. Thus this refutes the Roman Catholic

383
00:19:42.920 --> 00:19:43.839
<v Speaker 3>simplicity position.

384
00:19:44.240 --> 00:19:46.319
<v Speaker 2>And just to clarify, so thank you for that.

385
00:19:47.000 --> 00:19:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Since you guys do have a bit of a rigid structure,

386
00:19:49.519 --> 00:19:51.279
<v Speaker 1>do you prefer to do an opening statement and then

387
00:19:51.319 --> 00:19:52.079
<v Speaker 1>do rebuttals after?

388
00:19:52.119 --> 00:19:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to rebuttle him and then do an

389
00:19:53.319 --> 00:19:56.759
<v Speaker 2>opening statement, I'll do. I'll do opening statement. Okay, let's

390
00:19:56.759 --> 00:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>go ahead. And so representing the Catholic side.

391
00:19:58.960 --> 00:20:01.039
<v Speaker 1>If you're just joining the stream, shout out as well

392
00:20:01.039 --> 00:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to in the chat crucible, Andrews said, it's a one

393
00:20:04.200 --> 00:20:05.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars super chat. We're not going to do weird

394
00:20:05.599 --> 00:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sound effects for this, will keep it very very serious

395
00:20:07.519 --> 00:20:09.279
<v Speaker 1>to the point. But it also said thank you Andrew

396
00:20:09.319 --> 00:20:11.279
<v Speaker 1>for that. He said, Andrew Wilson here, thank you very

397
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>much for hosting this. And Andrew's Orthodox correct, I think correct.

398
00:20:15.440 --> 00:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's cool that you're tuning. I appreciated. I's all

399
00:20:18.039 --> 00:20:20.319
<v Speaker 1>your wife there too. So go ahead, Timothy your opening statement,

400
00:20:20.319 --> 00:20:22.039
<v Speaker 1>you have a ten minutes, give or take. Since he

401
00:20:22.079 --> 00:20:23.519
<v Speaker 1>took an extra two minutes, will give you two if

402
00:20:23.519 --> 00:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you need it. You have twelve minutes on the clock.

403
00:20:25.559 --> 00:20:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. Pure act is the basic expression of God's perfection,

404
00:20:32.559 --> 00:20:38.440
<v Speaker 2>all powerfulness, his essayity. That means He's self subsisting, his necessity,

405
00:20:38.880 --> 00:20:43.200
<v Speaker 2>his eternality, his simplicity. So God as pure act according

406
00:20:43.240 --> 00:20:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to classical theism Western definitions of God, which has included

407
00:20:50.640 --> 00:20:53.759
<v Speaker 2>broadly speaking, it's even included a lot of Orthodox thinkers

408
00:20:53.799 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Eastern thinkers over the last two thousand years. It is

409
00:20:57.000 --> 00:21:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the most basic expression of who and what God is.

410
00:21:00.680 --> 00:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>So when you think pure act, because this is the

411
00:21:02.799 --> 00:21:07.799
<v Speaker 2>term of pure metaphysics, think pure being. By pure being

412
00:21:07.880 --> 00:21:12.799
<v Speaker 2>we mean being without any becoming or potency mixed in.

413
00:21:13.799 --> 00:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>There are no non actualized potencies that are mixed in

414
00:21:18.000 --> 00:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>with the person of who God is now. Just so

415
00:21:22.000 --> 00:21:23.839
<v Speaker 2>we are clear, Jay told me the last time we

416
00:21:23.920 --> 00:21:29.039
<v Speaker 2>debated that mistaking a single aspect of God's reality means,

417
00:21:29.319 --> 00:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>in the context of Islam, worshiping a false God rather

418
00:21:33.039 --> 00:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>than worshiping the true God. Arrently, I would say, I

419
00:21:36.039 --> 00:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>hope for all of our sakes, Jay's sakes here too,

420
00:21:39.480 --> 00:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>because he's a friend and he's a good guy, that

421
00:21:42.279 --> 00:21:47.680
<v Speaker 2>this isn't true. Because mistaking God as being a composite

422
00:21:47.920 --> 00:21:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of act with passive potency is the most fundamental mistake

423
00:21:54.960 --> 00:21:57.599
<v Speaker 2>you can make as to who God is. Passive potency

424
00:21:57.640 --> 00:22:01.319
<v Speaker 2>means something else can change you. And we have to

425
00:22:01.359 --> 00:22:05.319
<v Speaker 2>talk about passive potency today. The fact that Jay has

426
00:22:05.319 --> 00:22:09.400
<v Speaker 2>asserted on multiple occasions that something else can change God

427
00:22:09.480 --> 00:22:15.519
<v Speaker 2>through this term passive potency. So there's some basics of

428
00:22:15.599 --> 00:22:19.519
<v Speaker 2>classical theism. One God cannot change. This is in Malachi

429
00:22:19.720 --> 00:22:25.799
<v Speaker 2>three six. It's reflected in James one seventeen. God can't change.

430
00:22:26.559 --> 00:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>This is a basic pillar of classical theism. God cannot

431
00:22:30.359 --> 00:22:35.279
<v Speaker 2>be affected by anything else. It's reflected in Acts seventeen

432
00:22:35.400 --> 00:22:39.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to twenty five. Thirdly, God cannot fail to

433
00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:42.400
<v Speaker 2>be what he is. The principle of necessity only applies

434
00:22:42.400 --> 00:22:44.599
<v Speaker 2>to him in this sense that he is utterly perfect,

435
00:22:44.640 --> 00:22:46.799
<v Speaker 2>and he cannot be anything other than what he is.

436
00:22:46.839 --> 00:22:52.079
<v Speaker 2>This is reflected in Matthew five, verse forty eight. Now,

437
00:22:52.960 --> 00:22:55.400
<v Speaker 2>if God were not pure act, and by this we

438
00:22:55.480 --> 00:22:59.119
<v Speaker 2>just mean pure being, there are so many equivocations that

439
00:22:59.599 --> 00:23:02.279
<v Speaker 2>are going to be made here on terms I just

440
00:23:02.400 --> 00:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>mean pure being, Thomas, and the Aristotelian lexicon that he's

441
00:23:07.279 --> 00:23:11.400
<v Speaker 2>working out of just means pure being with no becoming possible.

442
00:23:11.799 --> 00:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>The basic definition between a creator and a creature is

443
00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>there's only one creator. He's got to be pure being

444
00:23:19.000 --> 00:23:23.480
<v Speaker 2>itself outside the categories of time and space. Anything inside

445
00:23:23.480 --> 00:23:25.799
<v Speaker 2>the categories of time and space has to be a mixture,

446
00:23:25.839 --> 00:23:29.920
<v Speaker 2>a composite of act and potency, form and matter, substance

447
00:23:29.920 --> 00:23:33.319
<v Speaker 2>and accidents. There are seven modes of composition, and anything

448
00:23:33.319 --> 00:23:36.039
<v Speaker 2>inside the categories that was created by God has to

449
00:23:36.079 --> 00:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>be a creature who is a composite of these things.

450
00:23:40.200 --> 00:23:44.559
<v Speaker 2>But God has to be immutable, meaning he cannot change.

451
00:23:44.920 --> 00:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>He cannot change because he's outside the categories. He must

452
00:23:49.720 --> 00:23:54.319
<v Speaker 2>be eternal. Nicia actually anathematizes anyone who says that he's

453
00:23:54.359 --> 00:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>anything other than the eternal, meaning there's no change in God,

454
00:23:57.559 --> 00:24:00.880
<v Speaker 2>meaning God cannot exist prior to X and after X.

455
00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>That would that would earn one the anathematizations of Nicea.

456
00:24:05.799 --> 00:24:09.319
<v Speaker 2>He can't be composite. And if if God were mixed

457
00:24:09.400 --> 00:24:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in the way that Jay is saying, act with potency

458
00:24:12.559 --> 00:24:15.200
<v Speaker 2>in any manner, he would be composite. I mean there's

459
00:24:15.200 --> 00:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a composer behind God, because one would have to be

460
00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:24.200
<v Speaker 2>composed of their parts by some posterior principle, and that

461
00:24:24.279 --> 00:24:26.799
<v Speaker 2>composer itself would be God, not God. So he has

462
00:24:27.000 --> 00:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>This is why he has to be simple. Passive potency

463
00:24:31.200 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 2>means that that something else can change God. This always

464
00:24:34.599 --> 00:24:37.319
<v Speaker 2>implies temporality, so God would not be perfect. This is

465
00:24:37.359 --> 00:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a complete and total rejection of all classical theism. That

466
00:24:41.519 --> 00:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make it good or bad. I'm just stating it

467
00:24:44.039 --> 00:24:49.480
<v Speaker 2>from the outset that that classical theism requires God to

468
00:24:50.039 --> 00:24:53.440
<v Speaker 2>be pure act for him to even obtain all the

469
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:57.160
<v Speaker 2>properties that we're talking about. Now. What Jay will say

470
00:24:57.319 --> 00:25:03.319
<v Speaker 2>is that God transcends logical category. If God truly transcended

471
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>logical categories for one thing, this would require that we

472
00:25:06.519 --> 00:25:10.200
<v Speaker 2>predicate being unifically, and for a Roman Catholic, we never

473
00:25:10.279 --> 00:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>predicate being unifically. We always predicate being analogically. So that's

474
00:25:15.240 --> 00:25:18.960
<v Speaker 2>not true. Because we predicate being analogically, we can actually

475
00:25:19.000 --> 00:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about God in one way and one way only.

476
00:25:21.559 --> 00:25:25.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what the analogy is. But if it were true

477
00:25:25.680 --> 00:25:31.759
<v Speaker 2>that we predicated God unifically and and he transcends logical categories,

478
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:33.480
<v Speaker 2>then there would be no debates. We wouldn't be able

479
00:25:33.519 --> 00:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>to do what we're doing right now, wouldn't be able

480
00:25:35.160 --> 00:25:39.279
<v Speaker 2>to identify God, name God. There'd be no dogma, no councils,

481
00:25:39.359 --> 00:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>no scripture, anything that's important to Catholics or Orthodox. So

482
00:25:45.960 --> 00:25:49.000
<v Speaker 2>there's an absolute equivocation on this idea of analogical versus

483
00:25:49.119 --> 00:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>unifical predication of being. Now that because there are so

484
00:25:55.279 --> 00:25:57.559
<v Speaker 2>many different terms between the East and the West, I

485
00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>will say this, there is unintentional equivocation, meaning good faith

486
00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:06.759
<v Speaker 2>equivocation between the Eastern thinkers and the Western thinkers on

487
00:26:07.000 --> 00:26:11.319
<v Speaker 2>what pure act is and what it requires, but in

488
00:26:12.200 --> 00:26:15.319
<v Speaker 2>some sense, in the sense of meaning being pure being

489
00:26:15.359 --> 00:26:20.200
<v Speaker 2>without becoming. We have affirmations of one sense or another

490
00:26:20.359 --> 00:26:23.640
<v Speaker 2>of pure being by even Eastern thinkers like Gregory of Nissa,

491
00:26:24.119 --> 00:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Maximus the Confessor, Athanaceous, John Damascene, even Gregory Palamus, though

492
00:26:31.440 --> 00:26:36.079
<v Speaker 2>he puts forward a kind of alternative theory, the heartline

493
00:26:36.119 --> 00:26:41.000
<v Speaker 2>distinction between God's essence and energies, and more recently scholars

494
00:26:41.079 --> 00:26:47.160
<v Speaker 2>like doctor Bradshaw admits that God must be pure act.

495
00:26:47.359 --> 00:26:50.079
<v Speaker 2>Now I'll just run through a few of these, and

496
00:26:50.119 --> 00:26:53.480
<v Speaker 2>against Eunomias two, we have Gregory of Nissa saying, except

497
00:26:53.519 --> 00:26:57.839
<v Speaker 2>for the divine essence, nothing is uncreated, meaning the divine

498
00:26:57.920 --> 00:27:00.640
<v Speaker 2>essence alone is uncreated. This is good because for God

499
00:27:00.680 --> 00:27:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to be God, for there to be a real distinction

500
00:27:03.960 --> 00:27:07.319
<v Speaker 2>outside of the Uziah of God would be to posit

501
00:27:07.359 --> 00:27:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a second God. Gregory of Nissa also says, and again

502
00:27:11.559 --> 00:27:15.200
<v Speaker 2>he's operating on an Eastern equivocal definition, so I'm not

503
00:27:15.279 --> 00:27:17.839
<v Speaker 2>saying that he means exactly what Thomas means, but he

504
00:27:17.880 --> 00:27:20.039
<v Speaker 2>means the important part of it, that God is pure being,

505
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and that if he were any bit of potency passive potence,

506
00:27:23.400 --> 00:27:26.640
<v Speaker 2>he would have to be inside the ten categories of existence.

507
00:27:27.039 --> 00:27:29.599
<v Speaker 2>He says, the untouched and formless God is free from

508
00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:33.920
<v Speaker 2>all composition and likewise the only begotten. So this proves

509
00:27:33.920 --> 00:27:37.079
<v Speaker 2>a couple important things at once. That because God is

510
00:27:37.119 --> 00:27:40.039
<v Speaker 2>the untouched and formless God, free from all composition, that

511
00:27:40.119 --> 00:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>means any of the seven modes of composition, most importantly potency.

512
00:27:45.559 --> 00:27:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Same thing with the Sun. That's Gregory of Nissa. Maximus

513
00:27:50.480 --> 00:27:54.119
<v Speaker 2>the Confessor says God is the active and inexhaustible state

514
00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:58.319
<v Speaker 2>of all actualization. The important aspect of what he's saying

515
00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:01.799
<v Speaker 2>is that he is being. God is pure being, without becoming,

516
00:28:02.319 --> 00:28:07.119
<v Speaker 2>no becoming, mixed in, no potency. Maximus also says, for

517
00:28:07.160 --> 00:28:09.759
<v Speaker 2>it is not natural to contemplate any change in God.

518
00:28:10.279 --> 00:28:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this has been anathematized right at the beginning

519
00:28:12.799 --> 00:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>at Nicea to say that there's any change in God,

520
00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:18.839
<v Speaker 2>in whom we cannot conceive of any movement whatsoever. So

521
00:28:18.880 --> 00:28:23.839
<v Speaker 2>there can be no admixture of change in God. And

522
00:28:23.880 --> 00:28:29.079
<v Speaker 2>again this is basically obvious to everyone. Uh Saint Athanasius

523
00:28:29.119 --> 00:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>says God is holy what he is, he means, no potency,

524
00:28:32.599 --> 00:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>no division. I'm just demonstrating here that there are Eastern

525
00:28:36.400 --> 00:28:40.759
<v Speaker 2>thinkers who are operating out of the basic existential fact

526
00:28:41.079 --> 00:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of God as pure act Just think John of Damascus

527
00:28:44.480 --> 00:28:48.799
<v Speaker 2>says God is uncreated, immutable, and not composed. So composing

528
00:28:49.079 --> 00:28:51.279
<v Speaker 2>doesn't just mean act potency. It means any of the

529
00:28:51.279 --> 00:28:56.400
<v Speaker 2>other six modes of UH possibly composing God. Now we

530
00:28:56.480 --> 00:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>can reduce this to a syllogism to prove it, since

531
00:28:59.160 --> 00:29:02.559
<v Speaker 2>we're debating. After all, this comes out of Theologia one

532
00:29:02.880 --> 00:29:07.839
<v Speaker 2>nine one basic. First premise, whatever has passive potency can

533
00:29:07.880 --> 00:29:12.000
<v Speaker 2>be changed or moved from potentiality to actuality by something else.

534
00:29:13.039 --> 00:29:17.079
<v Speaker 2>By definition, this is what passive potency is. Second premise

535
00:29:17.160 --> 00:29:21.279
<v Speaker 2>is God can't be changed because we all agree on

536
00:29:21.720 --> 00:29:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that premise, and the conclusion is therefore God has no

537
00:29:25.480 --> 00:29:29.480
<v Speaker 2>passive potency. It's important to note for logic nerds that

538
00:29:29.519 --> 00:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this can be propositionalized. You can use symbolic logic to

539
00:29:32.240 --> 00:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>prove that this is true. I won't go through the

540
00:29:34.920 --> 00:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>symbolic logic, but it's important that people know this ought

541
00:29:38.680 --> 00:29:42.519
<v Speaker 2>to be sacricynct for any of us. Whatever has passive

542
00:29:42.559 --> 00:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>potency can be changed or moved by another. We don't

543
00:29:45.920 --> 00:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>agree that that can be done with God. Since God

544
00:29:48.480 --> 00:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>can't be changed it's been anathematized at NICEA. We have

545
00:29:52.200 --> 00:29:56.119
<v Speaker 2>to say God has no passive potency, and Jay has

546
00:29:56.119 --> 00:30:00.519
<v Speaker 2>said otherwise multiple times recently in the last year eight months.

547
00:30:02.799 --> 00:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>So there's a simple way of explaining this to people

548
00:30:07.400 --> 00:30:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the analogy of an automobile, since we're using all these

549
00:30:10.720 --> 00:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>terms composition, pure act, potency, whatnot. Composed of parts is

550
00:30:16.720 --> 00:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>how automobiles and all things operate. Think of your car,

551
00:30:20.599 --> 00:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a drive shaft, the wheels, the windows, the chassis, whatever.

552
00:30:24.440 --> 00:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>They are dependent on an external assembler. A composite is

553
00:30:29.720 --> 00:30:33.640
<v Speaker 2>ontologically posterior to its parts. If God had parts to

554
00:30:33.640 --> 00:30:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you depend on a composer, a God behind the God.

555
00:30:38.200 --> 00:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>This is not a mere logical category. This is a fact.

556
00:30:42.160 --> 00:30:48.680
<v Speaker 2>This is an existential fact. It contradicts his assayeity, meaning

557
00:30:48.720 --> 00:30:52.759
<v Speaker 2>he is self subsistent, and his necessity to say otherwise. Now,

558
00:30:53.680 --> 00:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>where you know, Jay, I think is equivocating or misunderstanding

559
00:30:58.720 --> 00:31:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Tomism is on several of the terms. They're just real

560
00:31:06.200 --> 00:31:11.279
<v Speaker 2>terminological differences that I think of good faith are eluding.

561
00:31:11.480 --> 00:31:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Now he will confuse platonism, neoplatonism, and aristotomism. These are

562
00:31:17.359 --> 00:31:22.240
<v Speaker 2>three separate systems that disagree radically, and they have informed

563
00:31:22.680 --> 00:31:25.759
<v Speaker 2>Christianity at different parts, But the Catholic Church is informed

564
00:31:25.759 --> 00:31:31.359
<v Speaker 2>by aristotomism, which I said predicates being analogically, which goes

565
00:31:31.480 --> 00:31:32.759
<v Speaker 2>right to the heart of what we're going to be

566
00:31:32.799 --> 00:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>debating with Palamus later. We don't use Platonism, which predicates

567
00:31:39.480 --> 00:31:44.920
<v Speaker 2>being unifically. I know the sounds absolutely insane, The terms

568
00:31:44.920 --> 00:31:47.759
<v Speaker 2>are are bizarre, but it's really really important because for

569
00:31:47.839 --> 00:31:50.880
<v Speaker 2>us to even be able to speak about God, we

570
00:31:51.039 --> 00:31:54.599
<v Speaker 2>have to predicate being analogically. That means we have to

571
00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 2>be in aristotomist mode. Jay has said before he thinks

572
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:03.079
<v Speaker 2>that Aristotle and Thomas made being a genus. They explicitly

573
00:32:03.119 --> 00:32:11.119
<v Speaker 2>reject this in Platonism. So the Tomistic predication is never nivical.

574
00:32:11.400 --> 00:32:13.559
<v Speaker 2>Being is never a genus. This goes right to the

575
00:32:13.559 --> 00:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>heart because of these equivocations. There are some basic terminological difficulties,

576
00:32:21.839 --> 00:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>confusions equivocations on that he makes on essence versus nature.

577
00:32:27.000 --> 00:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>These are very technical in matter, very much energies versus accidents,

578
00:32:32.240 --> 00:32:35.599
<v Speaker 2>act versus operations, Like pure act doesn't mean God is

579
00:32:35.759 --> 00:32:39.079
<v Speaker 2>pure action. It means God is pure being. And this

580
00:32:39.160 --> 00:32:41.839
<v Speaker 2>confuses the matter, and I think that might literally be

581
00:32:42.000 --> 00:32:44.680
<v Speaker 2>all that we're debating at the end of the day,

582
00:32:44.839 --> 00:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>because God is pure being and even Eastern thinkers accept it.

583
00:32:50.240 --> 00:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Passive versus active potency, and relations of opposition versus contrariety,

584
00:32:55.599 --> 00:33:02.599
<v Speaker 2>all of these together mean that necessarily think Jay is

585
00:33:02.680 --> 00:33:05.759
<v Speaker 2>intending to say that God is not pure being without

586
00:33:05.880 --> 00:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>any becoming. We have to get to the heart of

587
00:33:08.440 --> 00:33:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the matter, all right, and at a time on that.

588
00:33:10.279 --> 00:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll be adding another minute here Clark for a rebuttal,

589
00:33:12.160 --> 00:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>because he went over a little bit there.

590
00:33:14.519 --> 00:33:15.119
<v Speaker 2>I was saying it.

591
00:33:15.119 --> 00:33:16.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny because I was I was trying to,

592
00:33:17.039 --> 00:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, execute some things you were saying, and Groc

593
00:33:20.240 --> 00:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>went just as complex. He was like the onontological exigency

594
00:33:23.720 --> 00:33:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of also the dogmatic corpus. I was like, wow, when

595
00:33:26.319 --> 00:33:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you have two people here there speaking at a level

596
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the ai' I'm asking the question. You know, this

597
00:33:32.440 --> 00:33:35.039
<v Speaker 1>is a very complex debate has been going on for what,

598
00:33:35.680 --> 00:33:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in many ways well over a thousand years right now

599
00:33:39.480 --> 00:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as we're talking. And that's kind of an interesting point

600
00:33:42.759 --> 00:33:44.519
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, people that are Protestant are not

601
00:33:44.640 --> 00:33:47.359
<v Speaker 1>used to these complex, deep discussions.

602
00:33:46.920 --> 00:33:48.200
<v Speaker 2>And the things are like what do we want to

603
00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:48.960
<v Speaker 2>do today.

604
00:33:48.720 --> 00:33:51.559
<v Speaker 1>In Protestantism, And sometimes it's like, let's all be gay

605
00:33:51.599 --> 00:33:53.759
<v Speaker 1>pastors and everyone's like yay, and it's like okay.

606
00:33:53.759 --> 00:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know, people have.

607
00:33:54.839 --> 00:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Been thinking about some of these topics for for centuries,

608
00:33:57.680 --> 00:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, even for a millennia if you look at

609
00:33:59.440 --> 00:34:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the actual topic here and when we talk about what's important.

610
00:34:02.359 --> 00:34:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I just want to remind you guys, if you're watching that,

611
00:34:05.319 --> 00:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>take notes and rewatch, rethink, re listen, and try to

612
00:34:09.559 --> 00:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>understand the complexity of their arguments. Also crucible. Andrew Wilson,

613
00:34:14.360 --> 00:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for another one hundred dollars, said, and here's another. He

614
00:34:16.800 --> 00:34:19.559
<v Speaker 1>also yelled out, say my names. I don't know why,

615
00:34:19.760 --> 00:34:22.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll just say your name Andrew Wilson in the chat.

616
00:34:22.199 --> 00:34:24.119
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you here. We're very happy to

617
00:34:24.119 --> 00:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have you. He also sent another chat for one hundred dollars.

618
00:34:27.719 --> 00:34:29.519
<v Speaker 1>He said, here's the last one. Take these guys out

619
00:34:29.559 --> 00:34:31.599
<v Speaker 1>to dinner, Elijah and yourself love you all.

620
00:34:31.719 --> 00:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I would.

621
00:34:32.440 --> 00:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys are free afterwards, but

622
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.599
<v Speaker 1>we'll check that out. If you're just joining for the

623
00:34:36.599 --> 00:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>first time, don't forget to like the video, don't forget

624
00:34:38.239 --> 00:34:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe.

625
00:34:38.719 --> 00:34:39.760
<v Speaker 2>It's very important that you do.

626
00:34:40.119 --> 00:34:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And I want to jump into what I believe to

627
00:34:43.320 --> 00:34:45.039
<v Speaker 1>be the most important part, which is give them a

628
00:34:45.119 --> 00:34:48.599
<v Speaker 1>chance to respond to each other. Particularly before we do that. Though,

629
00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:51.119
<v Speaker 1>just a reminder to check out one of our sponsors

630
00:34:51.159 --> 00:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for today, redpill Threads dot com. They are a T

631
00:34:53.960 --> 00:34:55.599
<v Speaker 1>shirt company, but they're not just T shirt company. They

632
00:34:55.599 --> 00:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are a merch company that has shirts that actually align

633
00:34:57.840 --> 00:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>with our values. These are not just like mago ts.

634
00:35:00.559 --> 00:35:03.599
<v Speaker 1>When you check them out, you know, it's actually kind

635
00:35:03.639 --> 00:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of crazy, Like they have you know, Hollywood on Fire,

636
00:35:06.039 --> 00:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>basically mocking Gavin Newso. And they also have you know,

637
00:35:09.079 --> 00:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Disney T shirt, but the Disney Castle has a star

638
00:35:12.519 --> 00:35:14.519
<v Speaker 1>of David or bath Mett what are you Gonna call?

639
00:35:14.559 --> 00:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>On top and it says propaganda instead of Disney. And

640
00:35:17.239 --> 00:35:18.679
<v Speaker 1>so there's so many of the other T shirts they have.

641
00:35:18.719 --> 00:35:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Plus they also have the Burger king guy with his

642
00:35:20.800 --> 00:35:23.199
<v Speaker 1>mouth opening a cartoon and a memes style. They have

643
00:35:23.280 --> 00:35:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a I think they have like a monkey skull and

644
00:35:26.159 --> 00:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it says something like fully developed or something I don't

645
00:35:29.400 --> 00:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>even know. And then they also have the commet Pingpong

646
00:35:30.840 --> 00:35:33.559
<v Speaker 1>pizza T shirt the brands so it's basically provocative shirts

647
00:35:33.719 --> 00:35:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of all the right wing memes and culture that we've

648
00:35:35.719 --> 00:35:38.119
<v Speaker 1>created over the last you know, decade or so, since

649
00:35:38.119 --> 00:35:40.039
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of emerged on a four chan and they

650
00:35:40.119 --> 00:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>put it right on a T shirt. You get ten

651
00:35:41.440 --> 00:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>percent off today at Redpill threads dot com R E

652
00:35:44.360 --> 00:35:46.679
<v Speaker 1>D P I L T h R A d s

653
00:35:46.840 --> 00:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Use promo code rift for ten percent off.

654
00:35:49.480 --> 00:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Check it out, guys. It even just helps if you

655
00:35:50.920 --> 00:35:53.119
<v Speaker 1>click the link of the description as we are a

656
00:35:53.159 --> 00:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>new network, a new channel, and if you want to

657
00:35:55.320 --> 00:35:57.039
<v Speaker 1>know what Rift TV is just a shout out or

658
00:35:57.079 --> 00:36:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the first mainstream network developing from funding from only Western people,

659
00:36:03.159 --> 00:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>only Western countries, and we are not being defined by

660
00:36:07.280 --> 00:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>any Zionism or any sort of outside influence that will

661
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>try to destroy our core message, which is to save

662
00:36:12.519 --> 00:36:17.039
<v Speaker 1>Western civilization. That starts now and here with what we're discussing,

663
00:36:17.199 --> 00:36:20.599
<v Speaker 1>especially with Christianity. Now, let's go over to Jay Dyer.

664
00:36:21.639 --> 00:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to give you an example here. Jay is

665
00:36:23.880 --> 00:36:30.119
<v Speaker 1>representing the Orthodox tradition in this discussion. You have six

666
00:36:30.199 --> 00:36:32.079
<v Speaker 1>minutes on the clock. If you want to use, I'll

667
00:36:32.079 --> 00:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>give you a minute. You want to use the minute here?

668
00:36:33.320 --> 00:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to use a minute on the cross

669
00:36:34.760 --> 00:36:36.039
<v Speaker 1>examination of the clothing statement?

670
00:36:36.360 --> 00:36:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I can tell your minutes up, I'll go and use

671
00:36:38.880 --> 00:36:40.519
<v Speaker 2>it here, because he touched on a lot of things.

672
00:36:40.639 --> 00:36:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, cool, you have six minutes on the clock. Your

673
00:36:44.119 --> 00:36:45.119
<v Speaker 1>time starts now, all.

674
00:36:45.039 --> 00:36:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'll work through this.

675
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:48.199
<v Speaker 3>So the first thing that he said that was a

676
00:36:48.320 --> 00:36:51.679
<v Speaker 3>basic theological mistake was that he identified God in the

677
00:36:51.679 --> 00:36:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Divine Essence with asayity. Of course, all the three persons

678
00:36:55.000 --> 00:36:58.320
<v Speaker 3>have a sayity or self existence or our auto theos

679
00:36:58.360 --> 00:37:01.559
<v Speaker 3>in that system, if they're identical to the divine essence,

680
00:37:01.639 --> 00:37:05.440
<v Speaker 3>except that he's not aware of Cappadocian theology, nor the

681
00:37:05.440 --> 00:37:10.880
<v Speaker 3>theology of Constantinople, one which accepted unanimously with explicit decree

682
00:37:11.320 --> 00:37:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the necessity to follow the Cappadocian dictum that the Father

683
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:18.079
<v Speaker 3>is identified as autotheos. But to identify the Divine Essence

684
00:37:18.079 --> 00:37:21.840
<v Speaker 3>as autothaos is actually to introduce the later Christological and

685
00:37:21.880 --> 00:37:25.519
<v Speaker 3>Trinitarian heresy that the Calvinists introduced, that the Son and

686
00:37:25.559 --> 00:37:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the Spirit are also this autotheos because they share the

687
00:37:27.960 --> 00:37:28.880
<v Speaker 3>same divine essence.

688
00:37:28.920 --> 00:37:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So he's not aware of that.

689
00:37:29.960 --> 00:37:34.519
<v Speaker 3>That's a classic theological problem. Next, I didn't say that

690
00:37:35.039 --> 00:37:38.400
<v Speaker 3>God changed. He's confusing the idea of what orthodox call

691
00:37:38.480 --> 00:37:41.440
<v Speaker 3>reciprocity with the idea that God undergoes change. What we

692
00:37:41.480 --> 00:37:43.119
<v Speaker 3>mean by that is that if you read the Book

693
00:37:43.119 --> 00:37:46.119
<v Speaker 3>of Amos, for example, God says he's going to destroy Israel.

694
00:37:46.760 --> 00:37:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Amos comes and praise and says the Lord, please don't

695
00:37:49.159 --> 00:37:51.559
<v Speaker 3>do this, and God says, because you prayed, I'm not

696
00:37:51.679 --> 00:37:55.480
<v Speaker 3>going to destroy Israel. That does not mean that God

697
00:37:55.639 --> 00:37:58.280
<v Speaker 3>can't excuse me that God undergoes change. It means that

698
00:37:58.320 --> 00:38:02.920
<v Speaker 3>he is willingly condescended to engage in a creaturely reciprocity.

699
00:38:03.400 --> 00:38:06.079
<v Speaker 3>That means that God is first and foremost a divine person,

700
00:38:06.159 --> 00:38:08.519
<v Speaker 3>in particularly the person of the Father or the monarchea

701
00:38:08.599 --> 00:38:11.360
<v Speaker 3>of the Father, which is a crucial Orthodox doction upon

702
00:38:11.400 --> 00:38:14.159
<v Speaker 3>which all of this is built, whether it's the essence center, yourstinction,

703
00:38:14.280 --> 00:38:16.960
<v Speaker 3>or these other distinctions. So, no, it is not the

704
00:38:17.000 --> 00:38:19.599
<v Speaker 3>case that creatures cause it divine essence to change or

705
00:38:19.599 --> 00:38:22.239
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. In fact, I said that there's two

706
00:38:22.280 --> 00:38:24.400
<v Speaker 3>ways that we can name God. I guess he didn't

707
00:38:24.440 --> 00:38:25.920
<v Speaker 3>hear that, or he just wanted to do the quote

708
00:38:25.920 --> 00:38:28.679
<v Speaker 3>mind from the Eastern Fathers, ignoring, by the way, all

709
00:38:28.719 --> 00:38:31.239
<v Speaker 3>the places in those Eastern Fathers where they actually make

710
00:38:31.280 --> 00:38:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the arguments against his position. For example, a specifically cited

711
00:38:34.280 --> 00:38:37.599
<v Speaker 3>Maximus pointing out that the same energies that God possesses

712
00:38:37.679 --> 00:38:41.760
<v Speaker 3>are the same energies that deify the saints. He says

713
00:38:41.800 --> 00:38:45.559
<v Speaker 3>in at the Lascios, which thus means that Trent is

714
00:38:45.599 --> 00:38:48.360
<v Speaker 3>wrong when the Council, Trent says that we are justified

715
00:38:48.440 --> 00:38:51.960
<v Speaker 3>in baptism by the righteousness, not that God has himself,

716
00:38:52.000 --> 00:38:53.400
<v Speaker 3>but by the righteousness by which He.

717
00:38:53.400 --> 00:38:54.159
<v Speaker 2>Makes us just.

718
00:38:55.079 --> 00:39:01.760
<v Speaker 3>And again, to cite Nissa, again, common nature is identified

719
00:39:01.760 --> 00:39:04.199
<v Speaker 3>by common energy. If you read on the Holy Spirit

720
00:39:04.280 --> 00:39:06.800
<v Speaker 3>by Saint Basil, you'll notice that the way that Basil

721
00:39:06.920 --> 00:39:09.800
<v Speaker 3>proves the Holy Spirit is fully divine with the Father

722
00:39:09.840 --> 00:39:12.639
<v Speaker 3>and the Son is because he possesses the exact same

723
00:39:12.800 --> 00:39:16.400
<v Speaker 3>energy or operation, because energy and operations signify nature. Now

724
00:39:16.719 --> 00:39:19.199
<v Speaker 3>interesting in the scripture is when we read about the

725
00:39:19.239 --> 00:39:21.400
<v Speaker 3>gifts of the Holy Spirit. In the Book of Corinthians,

726
00:39:21.440 --> 00:39:24.280
<v Speaker 3>when Paul talks about the spiritually gifts, he calls them

727
00:39:24.400 --> 00:39:27.039
<v Speaker 3>the gifts of the inner gaya of the Spirit, the

728
00:39:27.119 --> 00:39:30.880
<v Speaker 3>energies of the Spirit. Tim could look at Strong's seventeen

729
00:39:31.000 --> 00:39:33.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty three and he would see all the multiple uses

730
00:39:33.400 --> 00:39:36.000
<v Speaker 3>throughout the New Testament, even places in the septuagen where

731
00:39:36.039 --> 00:39:38.920
<v Speaker 3>inner gaia is used many times over, and that leads

732
00:39:38.960 --> 00:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>me to the other issue he doesn't seem to be

733
00:39:40.719 --> 00:39:42.920
<v Speaker 3>well aware of in scholarship, which is if he could

734
00:39:42.960 --> 00:39:46.679
<v Speaker 3>read Michael Renee Barnes's book Dunamis in Gregor Nissa, where

735
00:39:46.719 --> 00:39:49.800
<v Speaker 3>there's this idea of the discussion of the power of God.

736
00:39:50.199 --> 00:39:53.639
<v Speaker 3>And this is the Cappadocian dictum to utilize first and

737
00:39:53.679 --> 00:39:57.360
<v Speaker 3>second actuality to help explain how it's possible for God

738
00:39:57.400 --> 00:40:00.559
<v Speaker 3>to create and yet to be perfect and to not

739
00:40:00.679 --> 00:40:04.280
<v Speaker 3>undergo change. So to say that God possesses first and

740
00:40:04.360 --> 00:40:07.199
<v Speaker 3>second act and that he doesn't always actualize all of

741
00:40:07.199 --> 00:40:10.320
<v Speaker 3>his powers does not imply any imperfection and deity, and

742
00:40:10.440 --> 00:40:13.559
<v Speaker 3>rather it implies God has free will. If I was

743
00:40:13.599 --> 00:40:16.559
<v Speaker 3>a Toast or a Roman Catholic, and I identified the

744
00:40:16.599 --> 00:40:20.199
<v Speaker 3>act of creating with the divine essence as they do

745
00:40:20.360 --> 00:40:25.159
<v Speaker 3>and with divine providence, then there's a necessary creation and

746
00:40:25.199 --> 00:40:30.039
<v Speaker 3>a necessary providence, and a necessary world that occurs because

747
00:40:30.079 --> 00:40:32.719
<v Speaker 3>those things are isomorphically identical. This is called the modal

748
00:40:32.719 --> 00:40:39.639
<v Speaker 3>collapse argument. So that also refutes Tim's reductionist position. People

749
00:40:39.639 --> 00:40:44.280
<v Speaker 3>can look at Radigalwitz's famous Oxford thesis on simplicity in

750
00:40:44.320 --> 00:40:49.239
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians. Moving on, he noted that as he went

751
00:40:49.239 --> 00:40:51.119
<v Speaker 3>through his quote Mind of the Eastern Church Fathers, he

752
00:40:51.280 --> 00:40:55.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of tried to fit this into an aristotomist scheme. Well,

753
00:40:56.079 --> 00:40:58.920
<v Speaker 3>if he was able to look into the scholarship on

754
00:40:59.119 --> 00:41:03.639
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians, the transition from the Cappadocians into Cyril and

755
00:41:03.679 --> 00:41:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Maximus and John Damascus in a very very recent, very

756
00:41:06.760 --> 00:41:09.159
<v Speaker 3>well known text by yan Zach Kuber called the Rise

757
00:41:09.199 --> 00:41:11.760
<v Speaker 3>of Christian Theology Naction Metaphysics, he would know that the

758
00:41:11.800 --> 00:41:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Cappadocians were not working with a two tiered cause effect

759
00:41:16.119 --> 00:41:19.519
<v Speaker 3>Aristotelian scheme. They're working more so with a neoplatonic scheme.

760
00:41:19.559 --> 00:41:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not advocating for neoplatonism. I'm saying that when the

761
00:41:22.400 --> 00:41:26.440
<v Speaker 3>neoplatonic philosophy is used by the Cabo Doocians, and thus

762
00:41:26.639 --> 00:41:29.599
<v Speaker 3>that model and that tendency to speak that way is

763
00:41:29.639 --> 00:41:32.760
<v Speaker 3>accept a particularly a Constantinople, one which by the way

764
00:41:32.840 --> 00:41:34.840
<v Speaker 3>is called close and had out of communion with Rome,

765
00:41:34.880 --> 00:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>which is the council that defines the Trinity. It has

766
00:41:37.519 --> 00:41:39.760
<v Speaker 3>nothing to do with aristotomism, and so this is a

767
00:41:39.840 --> 00:41:43.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of a revisionist anachronistic approach where they will take

768
00:41:43.559 --> 00:41:47.039
<v Speaker 3>things and reread the tonistic positions into quote minds from

769
00:41:47.039 --> 00:41:51.079
<v Speaker 3>the Church fathers. Because as I noted, as Gregor of

770
00:41:51.199 --> 00:41:54.679
<v Speaker 3>Nissa says, the invisible God becomes visible by his energies.

771
00:41:55.000 --> 00:41:57.079
<v Speaker 3>He is not seen or known in his essence, but

772
00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:00.480
<v Speaker 3>in his operations. And that's from on the Beata Toudes

773
00:42:00.480 --> 00:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>section four. So divine energies are what come down to us.

774
00:42:04.119 --> 00:42:06.679
<v Speaker 3>It is not the mere created effects, but the actual

775
00:42:06.760 --> 00:42:11.519
<v Speaker 3>participation in the attributes, energies and life of God. That's

776
00:42:11.559 --> 00:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>not a created thing. Jesus says in John seventeen, he

777
00:42:14.000 --> 00:42:16.159
<v Speaker 3>came to give us a share in the glory that

778
00:42:16.239 --> 00:42:18.239
<v Speaker 3>he had with the Father before the foundation of the world.

779
00:42:18.440 --> 00:42:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Saus it is a real participation in uncreated glory. God's

780
00:42:22.159 --> 00:42:24.760
<v Speaker 3>glory is not a creature. The glory and the grace

781
00:42:24.800 --> 00:42:27.480
<v Speaker 3>itself is what we partake of. So he says that

782
00:42:27.840 --> 00:42:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I engage in unifical predication. I never made an argument

783
00:42:30.480 --> 00:42:34.039
<v Speaker 3>that human terms or conceptions aren't unifical to the attributes.

784
00:42:34.039 --> 00:42:36.280
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I would agree with analogical predication.

785
00:42:36.360 --> 00:42:38.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just that the analogies do not match up to

786
00:42:38.360 --> 00:42:41.559
<v Speaker 3>divine essence, they match up.

787
00:42:41.440 --> 00:42:42.519
<v Speaker 2>To the energies.

788
00:42:42.639 --> 00:42:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Hence Basil says in Letter two thirty four, what God's

789
00:42:45.440 --> 00:42:47.800
<v Speaker 3>essence says, we do not know, but rather it is

790
00:42:47.880 --> 00:42:50.920
<v Speaker 3>his energies, his operations that come down to us. Exactly

791
00:42:50.920 --> 00:42:53.960
<v Speaker 3>what Innessa says Jay Dyer. That was the rebuttal.

792
00:42:54.000 --> 00:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, obviously you can both rebuttal his opening statement and

793
00:42:57.280 --> 00:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>his rebuttal here a few of his points. You are

794
00:43:00.280 --> 00:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have five minutes on the clock. Please with

795
00:43:03.400 --> 00:43:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the rebuttal, try to keep it within the direct timing.

796
00:43:07.239 --> 00:43:09.760
<v Speaker 1>If we're in halftime, you have an extra thirty seconds. Bleed,

797
00:43:10.119 --> 00:43:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, Timothy in Strong's since Jay cited it. Energeia

798
00:43:17.519 --> 00:43:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in Paul means God's activity and grace, not specifically, not

799
00:43:24.320 --> 00:43:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a metaphysical part of God.

800
00:43:25.920 --> 00:43:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Distinct from his essence. This would this would repeat the

801
00:43:29.119 --> 00:43:33.679
<v Speaker 2>entire position. The Catholic theology captures this through uncreated grace.

802
00:43:34.519 --> 00:43:38.519
<v Speaker 2>That's our position, God himself at work in us and

803
00:43:38.760 --> 00:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>without it, does all of this without dividing him into

804
00:43:41.519 --> 00:43:45.800
<v Speaker 2>essence versus energies. So it's sounded by that quote as

805
00:43:45.800 --> 00:43:49.679
<v Speaker 2>if it was essence energies, nothing of the sort. The

806
00:43:49.800 --> 00:43:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox move from a biblical usage of energeia, which again

807
00:43:53.199 --> 00:43:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I warned you there would be this equivocation time and

808
00:43:56.039 --> 00:43:58.639
<v Speaker 2>time and time again, because entergaya is a word in

809
00:43:58.760 --> 00:44:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the Greek that's frequent here to metaphysics, and ergay it

810
00:44:03.440 --> 00:44:06.159
<v Speaker 2>means something very very different in the in the distinction

811
00:44:06.280 --> 00:44:13.320
<v Speaker 2>between essence and energies. It's a strong extrapolation, in strong

812
00:44:13.800 --> 00:44:18.079
<v Speaker 2>I think the most important question that Jay frequently asks sincerely,

813
00:44:18.440 --> 00:44:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I've heard him ask it sincerely many times. I'm not

814
00:44:20.920 --> 00:44:24.480
<v Speaker 2>being facetious here is he'll ask, And this is really

815
00:44:24.480 --> 00:44:28.400
<v Speaker 2>at the heart of the matter. Why if there's a

816
00:44:28.440 --> 00:44:33.400
<v Speaker 2>real distinction between If Catholics allow a real distinction between

817
00:44:33.559 --> 00:44:38.239
<v Speaker 2>the three persons, why can't they abide a real distinction

818
00:44:38.639 --> 00:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>between the divine essence and the energies? Which is a

819
00:44:42.480 --> 00:44:46.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a fair question. The answer is usiological, which means

820
00:44:46.920 --> 00:44:50.719
<v Speaker 2>when we're looking at the single essence of God, the

821
00:44:51.679 --> 00:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>one thing which absolutely must be worshiped. This has been

822
00:44:57.360 --> 00:45:02.000
<v Speaker 2>affirmed at I see it too. Worship is latria worship

823
00:45:02.039 --> 00:45:06.800
<v Speaker 2>proper to the divine essence alone. We are talking about

824
00:45:07.199 --> 00:45:13.000
<v Speaker 2>God's one uzia. Real distinctions within that Uzia can be

825
00:45:13.079 --> 00:45:16.519
<v Speaker 2>made by what we've called relations of opposition between the

826
00:45:16.519 --> 00:45:21.679
<v Speaker 2>three persons. That because in proper theology, the three persons

827
00:45:21.719 --> 00:45:26.679
<v Speaker 2>are inside that divine essence, that Uziah. This does not

828
00:45:27.079 --> 00:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>enable or rehabilitate or allow extra usiological distinctions between God's

829
00:45:33.960 --> 00:45:37.400
<v Speaker 2>essence and energies, because the entire point of the essence

830
00:45:37.519 --> 00:45:41.360
<v Speaker 2>energies distinction is that there is a real distinction, and

831
00:45:41.400 --> 00:45:44.960
<v Speaker 2>they don't have what we call virtual distinctions anyway. There's

832
00:45:45.039 --> 00:45:52.199
<v Speaker 2>a real distinction between God's Uziah and his energies, his

833
00:45:52.440 --> 00:45:59.280
<v Speaker 2>operations that and they're uncreated, both whether you're talking philosophy

834
00:45:59.400 --> 00:46:04.719
<v Speaker 2>or classical theology. Anything that's uncreated is God. Anything that

835
00:46:04.840 --> 00:46:07.679
<v Speaker 2>is on the other side of creation as God. So

836
00:46:07.840 --> 00:46:10.960
<v Speaker 2>if you have an uzir that is the divine essence

837
00:46:10.960 --> 00:46:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of God and something else that's uncreated you're talking about,

838
00:46:16.400 --> 00:46:19.079
<v Speaker 2>you must be talking about two gods anyway. This is

839
00:46:19.079 --> 00:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>why we don't allow that distinction, any distinctions within the

840
00:46:22.480 --> 00:46:29.559
<v Speaker 2>single divine essence. The relations of opposition between fatherhood and filiality, filiation,

841
00:46:30.320 --> 00:46:33.960
<v Speaker 2>these are fine. These make sense. Relations of opposition makes

842
00:46:34.000 --> 00:46:37.159
<v Speaker 2>sense from within what we know to be the Trinity,

843
00:46:37.239 --> 00:46:40.360
<v Speaker 2>within the uziah of God. The Father is not the Son,

844
00:46:40.480 --> 00:46:43.119
<v Speaker 2>is not the Holy Spirit. But they're all the same

845
00:46:43.119 --> 00:46:48.519
<v Speaker 2>substance of God. But you can't make you can't distinguish

846
00:46:48.760 --> 00:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>between two uncreated realities outside of space and time without

847
00:46:53.920 --> 00:46:57.840
<v Speaker 2>positing a new essence. So it's an usiological answer. It's

848
00:46:57.920 --> 00:47:01.719
<v Speaker 2>very basic, and hopefully you see that the former is

849
00:47:01.760 --> 00:47:05.320
<v Speaker 2>possible because monotheism requires one uzia of God, whereas the

850
00:47:05.400 --> 00:47:09.519
<v Speaker 2>latter would require seemingly two divine uzias. They won't say it,

851
00:47:09.920 --> 00:47:13.079
<v Speaker 2>they won't say that the position is too divine uzias

852
00:47:13.079 --> 00:47:16.440
<v Speaker 2>because it's one divine essence and then something else uncreated.

853
00:47:17.320 --> 00:47:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's required, it's necessarily follows incredible.

854
00:47:22.480 --> 00:47:24.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in the midst of this you actually

855
00:47:24.119 --> 00:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>are under time by forty five seconds?

856
00:47:26.039 --> 00:47:28.559
<v Speaker 2>Can I? So if you want to keep going, yeah,

857
00:47:28.599 --> 00:47:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I would just say there's there's scriptural evidence against the

858
00:47:33.119 --> 00:47:39.480
<v Speaker 2>essence energies distinction too. I'll jump into the Theophanes that

859
00:47:39.880 --> 00:47:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Jay has been talking about in Exodus three one to six.

860
00:47:45.320 --> 00:47:49.599
<v Speaker 2>At the burning bush, God himself speaks. It's not that

861
00:47:49.760 --> 00:47:55.159
<v Speaker 2>God some energies of God speak. God himself speaks. It's

862
00:47:55.199 --> 00:47:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a direct quote. But pillar of cloud and fire the

863
00:47:58.400 --> 00:48:01.519
<v Speaker 2>Lord went before them, not a separate energy. Is a fact.

864
00:48:01.679 --> 00:48:06.280
<v Speaker 2>The Lord himself, the substance of God, went before them.

865
00:48:06.400 --> 00:48:09.920
<v Speaker 2>So direct quote in Isaiah chapter six one to five.

866
00:48:10.440 --> 00:48:14.079
<v Speaker 2>In the vision Isaiah saw the Lord did not see

867
00:48:14.079 --> 00:48:20.440
<v Speaker 2>some likeness of the Lord. In John chapter twelve, verse

868
00:48:20.480 --> 00:48:23.920
<v Speaker 2>forty one, this is applied to Christ. At the transfiguration,

869
00:48:24.039 --> 00:48:30.239
<v Speaker 2>the apostles beheld Christ's glory participation. So this is important

870
00:48:30.320 --> 00:48:33.559
<v Speaker 2>because when we're talking about the divine essence, we're talking

871
00:48:33.599 --> 00:48:36.000
<v Speaker 2>about the divine essence. When we're talking about some work

872
00:48:36.039 --> 00:48:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of God, we're talking about something that's distinct.

873
00:48:39.760 --> 00:48:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, Jay, I don't know if you were laughing

874
00:48:42.119 --> 00:48:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at him or you're laughing in his argument, I showed

875
00:48:44.320 --> 00:48:46.159
<v Speaker 1>you're chuckling a little bit over there, and I couldn't

876
00:48:46.199 --> 00:48:47.639
<v Speaker 1>help but notice.

877
00:48:47.719 --> 00:48:48.599
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, as you.

878
00:48:48.519 --> 00:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Cross examine and you go into this, you'll have exactly

879
00:48:50.880 --> 00:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to respond.

880
00:48:52.880 --> 00:48:54.199
<v Speaker 2>Here the clock starts.

881
00:48:54.239 --> 00:48:57.199
<v Speaker 3>Now go ahead, No but wait a minute, oh yes,

882
00:48:57.239 --> 00:49:01.000
<v Speaker 3>stop hold on, so I can cross the exam and interrupt,

883
00:49:01.119 --> 00:49:02.400
<v Speaker 3>right uh.

884
00:49:02.199 --> 00:49:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. I just I just

885
00:49:04.400 --> 00:49:06.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted you to do a little bit, if you is

886
00:49:06.000 --> 00:49:07.199
<v Speaker 2>that how you would like to that is that how

887
00:49:07.239 --> 00:49:09.639
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to do that that section, like to what

888
00:49:09.679 --> 00:49:11.639
<v Speaker 2>were you going to say? Oh? No, I was gonna say.

889
00:49:11.679 --> 00:49:13.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know if you wanted to go back over

890
00:49:13.079 --> 00:49:15.519
<v Speaker 1>what he was just saying right now and then jump

891
00:49:15.519 --> 00:49:16.199
<v Speaker 1>in there a little bit.

892
00:49:16.199 --> 00:49:18.920
<v Speaker 3>But uh, well, what we'd agreed to was cross exam

893
00:49:18.960 --> 00:49:21.079
<v Speaker 3>where we can where I cross exam him and I

894
00:49:21.119 --> 00:49:23.920
<v Speaker 3>can abrupt him correct yea.

895
00:49:23.920 --> 00:49:28.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, totally within reason. Yeah yeah, I mean yeah, exactly.

896
00:49:28.119 --> 00:49:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Potentially just gonna interrupt every five seconds.

897
00:49:31.599 --> 00:49:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's funny.

898
00:49:32.440 --> 00:49:34.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad that you mentioned Exodus three because it was

899
00:49:34.199 --> 00:49:36.400
<v Speaker 3>actually next to my notes, because I don't know if

900
00:49:36.400 --> 00:49:38.760
<v Speaker 3>you're familiar with Exdus twenty three, because God goes on

901
00:49:38.840 --> 00:49:42.599
<v Speaker 3>to describe who that being is. You said, the substance

902
00:49:42.639 --> 00:49:45.519
<v Speaker 3>of God went before them. Do you think that the

903
00:49:45.559 --> 00:49:47.760
<v Speaker 3>substance of God is the angel messenger?

904
00:49:49.159 --> 00:49:53.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I think I think that God entered into I

905
00:49:53.000 --> 00:49:58.920
<v Speaker 2>believe that the Theophanes represent a creation of God. Are

906
00:49:58.920 --> 00:50:00.800
<v Speaker 2>they the substance of God or they represent they're not

907
00:50:00.880 --> 00:50:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the substance of God. You said the substance of God

908
00:50:02.800 --> 00:50:05.039
<v Speaker 2>went before them. Yeah, No, I didn't mean it that way.

909
00:50:05.039 --> 00:50:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But in Leviticus nine, it's said to be the

910
00:50:08.039 --> 00:50:09.199
<v Speaker 3>glory of God that comes down.

911
00:50:10.679 --> 00:50:13.679
<v Speaker 2>It was an equivocation. Yeah, I'm just saying in God himself.

912
00:50:13.760 --> 00:50:16.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's God himself for a representation, because that's

913
00:50:16.639 --> 00:50:17.079
<v Speaker 3>a big deal.

914
00:50:18.239 --> 00:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>We believe it's a representation. Okay.

915
00:50:20.920 --> 00:50:23.400
<v Speaker 3>In Leviticus nine, what comes down in that so often

916
00:50:23.440 --> 00:50:26.159
<v Speaker 3>he is called the glory of God is God's glory

917
00:50:26.159 --> 00:50:30.599
<v Speaker 3>of creature? Yes, God's glory is a creature. Yes, you're

918
00:50:30.599 --> 00:50:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a polytheist.

919
00:50:31.960 --> 00:50:35.400
<v Speaker 2>No, you called the divice that glory is a creature

920
00:50:35.719 --> 00:50:39.639
<v Speaker 2>because it's created. Yes, God's glorious creator, like I said,

921
00:50:39.920 --> 00:50:41.280
<v Speaker 2>like I said at the beginning, well this is the

922
00:50:41.280 --> 00:50:45.079
<v Speaker 2>Catholic position, and you know it's the laughing at it

923
00:50:45.119 --> 00:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>to pretend that this isn't a one thousand year old dispute.

924
00:50:48.039 --> 00:50:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Are you about what you're saying? God's glory is created?

925
00:50:51.679 --> 00:50:53.519
<v Speaker 3>God's glory is? Is it eternal?

926
00:50:54.800 --> 00:50:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

927
00:50:55.280 --> 00:50:59.360
<v Speaker 3>So there's eternal. So you're a polytheist. God's glory is

928
00:50:59.360 --> 00:51:01.800
<v Speaker 3>eternally created. And this is a game.

929
00:51:02.920 --> 00:51:03.559
<v Speaker 2>It's not a game.

930
00:51:03.840 --> 00:51:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is why it's let me know poetry, let's

931
00:51:07.199 --> 00:51:10.039
<v Speaker 3>do fifteen second blocks. It's not a game. No, it's

932
00:51:10.400 --> 00:51:13.239
<v Speaker 3>you said that God's glory is eternal and it's a creature,

933
00:51:13.679 --> 00:51:17.199
<v Speaker 3>that the angels are eternal, and no they're not. They're created.

934
00:51:17.800 --> 00:51:21.760
<v Speaker 2>No, they can be eternal with God like a footprint

935
00:51:21.800 --> 00:51:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in sand, to use Augustin's term.

936
00:51:24.400 --> 00:51:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, are they created axt nilo? Well, of course, yeah,

937
00:51:29.280 --> 00:51:34.840
<v Speaker 3>they're not eternal, they're not uncreated. But with regard to glory,

938
00:51:35.000 --> 00:51:38.280
<v Speaker 3>it can't since it's uncreated. Since it is created. Which

939
00:51:38.320 --> 00:51:39.800
<v Speaker 3>one is it? Since it's created?

940
00:51:40.159 --> 00:51:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Jay, No, it's not to God because I'm created, separate

941
00:51:45.840 --> 00:51:48.679
<v Speaker 2>from the divine, as you to gods.

942
00:51:49.239 --> 00:51:52.039
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe that that the glory is a creature.

943
00:51:52.639 --> 00:51:55.000
<v Speaker 3>You may you messed up by saying that you belielory

944
00:51:55.360 --> 00:51:57.599
<v Speaker 3>is eternal. It's uncreated. It's the glory that.

945
00:51:57.960 --> 00:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Is it separate from the divine. Up to me, it's

946
00:52:00.079 --> 00:52:04.280
<v Speaker 2>my time because i'm because I'm asking you back questions

947
00:52:04.280 --> 00:52:06.280
<v Speaker 2>in my cross examination. All right, he's.

948
00:52:06.079 --> 00:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Correct on that, Yeah, sure, all right, Yeah, so let's

949
00:52:09.760 --> 00:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>let's leave the question.

950
00:52:12.480 --> 00:52:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Seventeen. Can I clarify my answer quickly if he allows you? Okay,

951
00:52:15.800 --> 00:52:20.519
<v Speaker 2>so we say it's not polytheism because it's created. It's

952
00:52:20.519 --> 00:52:24.679
<v Speaker 2>that simple. God's glory is a creature. God's glory is

953
00:52:24.679 --> 00:52:25.079
<v Speaker 2>a creature.

954
00:52:25.119 --> 00:52:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Wow, you understand that in Ezekiel, the son is identified

955
00:52:28.320 --> 00:52:28.960
<v Speaker 3>as the glory.

956
00:52:29.519 --> 00:52:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Is the son a creature? No, this is an equivocal definition,

957
00:52:33.320 --> 00:52:36.880
<v Speaker 2>because yeah, woman is the glory of man. That doesn't

958
00:52:36.880 --> 00:52:41.679
<v Speaker 2>mean that she's Uh. The unifical predication is the glory

959
00:52:41.679 --> 00:52:45.119
<v Speaker 2>of the father. The son in this analogical sense can

960
00:52:45.119 --> 00:52:47.000
<v Speaker 2>be the glory of the Father. That doesn't mean so

961
00:52:47.039 --> 00:52:52.599
<v Speaker 2>when is that God's glory as such is uncreated? Okay?

962
00:52:52.599 --> 00:52:55.239
<v Speaker 3>And Judge's six it says that Yahweh turned his face

963
00:52:55.280 --> 00:52:58.039
<v Speaker 3>to get in. Is that Yahweh really in time of space?

964
00:53:00.480 --> 00:53:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Or you don't know? Yeah, I'm not sure.

965
00:53:02.119 --> 00:53:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe you should have looked into the theophanies if

966
00:53:03.800 --> 00:53:08.440
<v Speaker 3>you wanted to talk. Well, you've already admitted that God's

967
00:53:08.440 --> 00:53:14.400
<v Speaker 3>glory is a creature. Right, that's polytheism, an analogy. I mean,

968
00:53:14.480 --> 00:53:16.639
<v Speaker 3>I never disagree with anal analogical predication.

969
00:53:16.679 --> 00:53:19.280
<v Speaker 2>But you no, No, I don't mean analogic. I mean when

970
00:53:19.360 --> 00:53:23.960
<v Speaker 2>God turns his face. You think that a theophany means

971
00:53:24.400 --> 00:53:31.440
<v Speaker 2>requires logical body? Did Jacob rustle with Jesus it's a theophany?

972
00:53:31.480 --> 00:53:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Did he wrestle with Jesus. We say this is a

973
00:53:33.480 --> 00:53:40.840
<v Speaker 2>created participation. So the son prior to the incarnation was created. No,

974
00:53:40.880 --> 00:53:42.920
<v Speaker 2>this is what you said. It was a creature.

975
00:53:43.440 --> 00:53:45.440
<v Speaker 3>It's less than a So now you're a polytheist again,

976
00:53:45.519 --> 00:53:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and there's multiple gods less than the creature.

977
00:53:47.639 --> 00:53:49.679
<v Speaker 2>I can't be a polytheist, Jay, if I keep saying

978
00:53:49.679 --> 00:53:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that these are creations, I'm only a god. I separate

979
00:53:54.480 --> 00:53:57.000
<v Speaker 2>from the divine essence you're calling that is God, and

980
00:53:57.679 --> 00:54:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that they're called that means they're not creatures.

981
00:54:02.000 --> 00:54:04.840
<v Speaker 3>You always uncreated. His glory is uncreated because he had

982
00:54:04.880 --> 00:54:08.679
<v Speaker 3>it forever in the triad in a triadic relationship. You

983
00:54:08.800 --> 00:54:11.960
<v Speaker 3>said God's glory is a creature. You just messed up

984
00:54:11.960 --> 00:54:13.440
<v Speaker 3>big time. That's idolatry.

985
00:54:13.840 --> 00:54:16.159
<v Speaker 1>That's I'm done all right six the time, And yeah,

986
00:54:16.159 --> 00:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna add another thirty seconds out of the clock.

987
00:54:17.920 --> 00:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Then anyways, you still have thirty seconds here for him

988
00:54:20.360 --> 00:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>interrupting you with the questions. So you have an additional

989
00:54:22.840 --> 00:54:25.559
<v Speaker 1>minute on a future category if you'd like to, especially

990
00:54:25.599 --> 00:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in the closing or on a separate topic.

991
00:54:28.360 --> 00:54:30.199
<v Speaker 2>We'll go ahead and we will switch Outay, hold on,

992
00:54:30.199 --> 00:54:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I have more time or.

993
00:54:31.320 --> 00:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>No, I'll give you an extra minute because of him

994
00:54:32.760 --> 00:54:34.639
<v Speaker 1>interrupting the questions. You have thirty seconds left, and I'm

995
00:54:34.760 --> 00:54:38.119
<v Speaker 1>give you additional thirty seconds onto either to the closing

996
00:54:38.239 --> 00:54:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or on the section of the next topic. Let's go

997
00:54:40.800 --> 00:54:44.119
<v Speaker 1>over to Timothy. Go ahead, you have five minutes on

998
00:54:44.159 --> 00:54:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the clock. You can be in your questioning.

999
00:54:46.400 --> 00:54:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay. If the energies are not the divine essence, there's

1000
00:54:50.480 --> 00:54:54.679
<v Speaker 2>a real distinction between them, but they're still uncreated. How

1001
00:54:54.679 --> 00:54:58.039
<v Speaker 2>many such uncreated realities are there in God? Butzel says,

1002
00:54:58.039 --> 00:55:03.519
<v Speaker 2>there's infinite energies, So they're infinite uncreated existences. Are they

1003
00:55:03.639 --> 00:55:08.199
<v Speaker 2>essences of their own? Their energies? Hence they're not essences? Oh,

1004
00:55:08.239 --> 00:55:10.079
<v Speaker 2>so what are they? But they're uncreated?

1005
00:55:10.199 --> 00:55:15.920
<v Speaker 3>So the operations, the attributes, and the thought, wills or

1006
00:55:16.000 --> 00:55:17.199
<v Speaker 3>ideas of God.

1007
00:55:17.079 --> 00:55:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So they're infinite. There are uncreated things? Well, I'm asking you. Yeah,

1008
00:55:21.760 --> 00:55:24.679
<v Speaker 2>God is one in many. But except so when we

1009
00:55:24.760 --> 00:55:29.639
<v Speaker 2>go to worship God, we worship infinite things. Yes, God's infinite.

1010
00:55:29.679 --> 00:55:31.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you know that. No, do you

1011
00:55:31.440 --> 00:55:35.320
<v Speaker 2>worship an infinite number of properties?

1012
00:55:35.800 --> 00:55:39.079
<v Speaker 3>When we say God is infinite, infinity is an infinite number?

1013
00:55:39.960 --> 00:55:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Can I worship the energies alone without worshiping the divine essence.

1014
00:55:44.320 --> 00:55:48.679
<v Speaker 3>No, because every person who acts in the every every

1015
00:55:48.719 --> 00:55:52.000
<v Speaker 3>act of God is triadic and thus includes all of God.

1016
00:55:52.199 --> 00:55:55.280
<v Speaker 2>But then, how are they really distinct because God does

1017
00:55:55.320 --> 00:55:59.639
<v Speaker 2>different things? What does that mean? Creating isn't walking on water? No,

1018
00:56:00.159 --> 00:56:02.960
<v Speaker 2>if I can't worship them separately, in other words, if

1019
00:56:03.000 --> 00:56:06.599
<v Speaker 2>there's not a passive potency in them that is receptive

1020
00:56:06.639 --> 00:56:10.480
<v Speaker 2>of my worship God's divine essence, his energies, I can't

1021
00:56:10.519 --> 00:56:14.679
<v Speaker 2>worship them separately. So why call them really distinct? Because

1022
00:56:14.880 --> 00:56:17.639
<v Speaker 2>if you guys had virtual distinctions the way you should hear,

1023
00:56:17.679 --> 00:56:19.559
<v Speaker 2>this wouldn't be a problem. But because you say it's

1024
00:56:19.599 --> 00:56:23.039
<v Speaker 2>a real distinction in God, that's a problem. Modal collapse

1025
00:56:23.119 --> 00:56:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is why we don't. This is not modal collapse. Why

1026
00:56:25.440 --> 00:56:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you why we don't have that? No? No,

1027
00:56:28.199 --> 00:56:31.159
<v Speaker 2>But but then they're not really distinct. You just said they're.

1028
00:56:31.840 --> 00:56:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Distinct, because it can't be they are really distinct because

1029
00:56:35.840 --> 00:56:37.519
<v Speaker 3>the Father and the son are really distinct, and you

1030
00:56:37.559 --> 00:56:38.440
<v Speaker 3>don't have a problem with that.

1031
00:56:38.559 --> 00:56:40.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a problem with that because that's all

1032
00:56:40.119 --> 00:56:42.280
<v Speaker 2>within one Uziah. Do you have a problem with constant

1033
00:56:42.280 --> 00:56:46.039
<v Speaker 2>standardizes are the operations from that one? You see, they

1034
00:56:46.079 --> 00:56:48.840
<v Speaker 2>might be the operations from but they're different from the uzia.

1035
00:56:50.199 --> 00:56:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Distinction applies to the substance. You're with me, right, So

1036
00:56:54.159 --> 00:56:57.039
<v Speaker 2>like when we make a distinction about a thing, we're

1037
00:56:57.079 --> 00:57:03.599
<v Speaker 2>making a distinction about the substance itself. Philosophy one on one. Yeah, yeah, sure, okay,

1038
00:57:03.840 --> 00:57:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I That's why I asked, why can

1039
00:57:06.840 --> 00:57:10.199
<v Speaker 2>we call them really distinct when they're they're somehow outside

1040
00:57:10.280 --> 00:57:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the uzia. They're different from it. They're really distinct, they're

1041
00:57:14.400 --> 00:57:17.559
<v Speaker 2>not virtually distinct. But I mean, do you want to end?

1042
00:57:17.760 --> 00:57:20.079
<v Speaker 2>You want answer? I want your answer?

1043
00:57:20.280 --> 00:57:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, I'm going to say what they say because

1044
00:57:21.719 --> 00:57:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I agree with them. They say that just as a

1045
00:57:24.320 --> 00:57:28.159
<v Speaker 3>person works, he's not identical to the work, and persons

1046
00:57:28.159 --> 00:57:28.960
<v Speaker 3>do different works.

1047
00:57:29.039 --> 00:57:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but that's a nonsense term. You can't say it's

1048
00:57:31.360 --> 00:57:36.320
<v Speaker 2>really distinct. That's fine. I'm just saying it doesn't work

1049
00:57:36.360 --> 00:57:41.639
<v Speaker 2>out because when something is distinct. No not, because when

1050
00:57:41.679 --> 00:57:45.159
<v Speaker 2>something is distinct usiologically, that means that we would have

1051
00:57:45.239 --> 00:57:48.760
<v Speaker 2>to act upon it. It would it would receive passive potency.

1052
00:57:48.800 --> 00:57:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Is that the persons, because they're the same. Do you

1053
00:57:52.719 --> 00:57:56.639
<v Speaker 2>think the persons aren't consubstantial they're really distinct? No, they're

1054
00:57:56.679 --> 00:57:59.719
<v Speaker 2>really distinct within an uzia. Oh, I don't believe that.

1055
00:58:00.280 --> 00:58:02.639
<v Speaker 2>You don't believe the person of the trinity are within

1056
00:58:02.719 --> 00:58:04.679
<v Speaker 2>the same us. I don't start with the essence. I'll

1057
00:58:04.679 --> 00:58:07.159
<v Speaker 2>start with the fathers, the monarchical dark. Wait, you don't

1058
00:58:07.199 --> 00:58:10.440
<v Speaker 2>believe that the three persons are consubstantart. I'm not asking

1059
00:58:10.440 --> 00:58:13.079
<v Speaker 2>where you started. I asked, do you think that the

1060
00:58:13.159 --> 00:58:16.760
<v Speaker 2>persons are consubstantial? Yes? Or now? Of course they're consubstantial. Okay,

1061
00:58:16.840 --> 00:58:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't So they're not ziologically distinct. That's all I'm saying.

1062
00:58:19.920 --> 00:58:22.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't have your metaphysics. No, I don't have your metaphysics.

1063
00:58:22.719 --> 00:58:25.840
<v Speaker 2>But the point is they can't be distinct if we're

1064
00:58:25.840 --> 00:58:28.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about two separate things. The persons are not too separate.

1065
00:58:29.000 --> 00:58:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The three persons are not too separate.

1066
00:58:30.440 --> 00:58:34.039
<v Speaker 3>The relations of opposition the energy is a separate not Okay,

1067
00:58:34.199 --> 00:58:36.079
<v Speaker 3>they're not separate, is my if I work?

1068
00:58:36.199 --> 00:58:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it separate? No? You screwed up there. No I didn't.

1069
00:58:38.920 --> 00:58:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You're just saying I screwed up the energy did I

1070
00:58:41.480 --> 00:58:44.480
<v Speaker 2>never said separate? Is it consubstantial or not? I said,

1071
00:58:44.519 --> 00:58:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the persons are consubstantially. Yes, the energies aren't consubstantial with

1072
00:58:47.920 --> 00:58:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the essence, though for very distinct Okay, but then I

1073
00:58:51.320 --> 00:58:54.559
<v Speaker 2>can't worship them separately. Then the same here's here's another one,

1074
00:58:54.559 --> 00:58:58.360
<v Speaker 2>that the essence is eternally unknowable. Do we fulfill our

1075
00:58:58.400 --> 00:59:01.360
<v Speaker 2>final end in the Beatific vision. We don't believe in

1076
00:59:01.360 --> 00:59:05.559
<v Speaker 2>the Bitua vision because we believe in the purpose of life. Okay,

1077
00:59:05.679 --> 00:59:08.360
<v Speaker 2>when we look at you believe we see God in

1078
00:59:08.400 --> 00:59:09.519
<v Speaker 2>the end. We don't see God.

1079
00:59:09.559 --> 00:59:13.119
<v Speaker 3>That's not our union, the uncreated energies, and we have

1080
00:59:13.199 --> 00:59:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a body. So I don't believe in a uh neoplatonic

1081
00:59:17.159 --> 00:59:18.360
<v Speaker 3>satiating of the intellect.

1082
00:59:18.400 --> 00:59:22.679
<v Speaker 2>You're a platonist. I'm not a platonist on the Beato vision. No,

1083
00:59:22.760 --> 00:59:27.599
<v Speaker 2>you know it's from origin. Yes, So you don't believe

1084
00:59:27.760 --> 00:59:31.079
<v Speaker 2>that we can fulfill the purpose of life and see

1085
00:59:31.119 --> 00:59:32.239
<v Speaker 2>the divine essence ever?

1086
00:59:33.280 --> 00:59:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Nissa says, no one sees the divine essence ever,

1087
00:59:35.800 --> 00:59:37.159
<v Speaker 3>even in theton.

1088
00:59:36.719 --> 00:59:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Even in the sketon.

1089
00:59:38.599 --> 00:59:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I said, we see the divine energies, as the

1090
00:59:41.039 --> 00:59:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Cappadocians say, we see the things around God, not his essence.

1091
00:59:46.039 --> 00:59:47.639
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the things around God are. If

1092
00:59:47.679 --> 00:59:50.719
<v Speaker 2>God has passive potency, explain to me how he can

1093
00:59:50.760 --> 00:59:53.440
<v Speaker 2>be immutable, eternal, perfect thirty second bleed.

1094
00:59:53.519 --> 00:59:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Right now, divine essence is unchanging, unalterable. But I don't

1095
00:59:58.000 --> 01:00:00.519
<v Speaker 3>reduce the persons and their actions to the essence, and

1096
01:00:00.559 --> 01:00:03.440
<v Speaker 3>so it's not a problem for me. Yes, I answered,

1097
01:00:03.480 --> 01:00:04.400
<v Speaker 3>with reciprocity.

1098
01:00:04.599 --> 01:00:08.400
<v Speaker 2>You're just saying there is a circular object, this planer

1099
01:00:08.440 --> 01:00:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that can be orthogonal. I mean, explain divine revelation then yeah,

1100
01:00:12.360 --> 01:00:16.679
<v Speaker 2>So if God can be I never I said that

1101
01:00:16.760 --> 01:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>he condescends to have their identity with creatures. That doesn't

1102
01:00:20.519 --> 01:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>make sense. I'm sorry you don't believe that prayer, right,

1103
01:00:22.840 --> 01:00:26.639
<v Speaker 2>God answers prayer? No, I believe acted upon which you've

1104
01:00:26.679 --> 01:00:29.079
<v Speaker 2>said several times in your podcast. I never said that

1105
01:00:29.639 --> 01:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>passive potency. How could he still be immutable? The divine

1106
01:00:33.280 --> 01:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>essence doesn't change.

1107
01:00:34.639 --> 01:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>God condescends to have reciprole relationships with our prayers.

1108
01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>That's what I said. That's time there.

1109
01:00:39.559 --> 01:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you don't think God answers prayers. So again

1110
01:00:41.559 --> 01:00:43.079
<v Speaker 3>you have a pagan metaphysical system.

1111
01:00:43.239 --> 01:00:44.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's the time question.

1112
01:00:44.840 --> 01:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, what I want to know from you guys in

1113
01:00:46.360 --> 01:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the chat right now if you heard the cross examination.

1114
01:00:48.840 --> 01:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>One's in the chat if you think that Jay is

1115
01:00:51.159 --> 01:00:53.119
<v Speaker 1>cooking and that you think that he's winning right now

1116
01:00:53.719 --> 01:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just truth, and I don't want to

1117
01:00:55.320 --> 01:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hear just the Orthodox pros.

1118
01:00:56.960 --> 01:00:58.599
<v Speaker 2>I know how you guys, are you guys will just

1119
01:00:58.639 --> 01:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>be like jaywins.

1120
01:01:00.480 --> 01:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So One's in the chat if you think theologically is

1121
01:01:02.920 --> 01:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>arguments and more sound. Two in the chat if you

1122
01:01:05.079 --> 01:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>think that Timothy's arguments and cross examination was more sound.

1123
01:01:08.800 --> 01:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>That means even if you're Orthodox or you're Catholic, you

1124
01:01:11.440 --> 01:01:13.239
<v Speaker 2>don't have to vote for your home team. One's in

1125
01:01:13.239 --> 01:01:15.159
<v Speaker 2>the chat for j Two's in the chats.

1126
01:01:15.760 --> 01:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Before we do the closing statement, I do want to

1127
01:01:17.440 --> 01:01:19.159
<v Speaker 1>just read a couple of super chats here reminding you

1128
01:01:19.199 --> 01:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>guys that Humphluru one said tim is based, Jay is based.

1129
01:01:22.920 --> 01:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We should be Catholic republic and the Authos should build

1130
01:01:25.400 --> 01:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the churches. We also had from Daniel Ward seventy nine said,

1131
01:01:28.400 --> 01:01:30.199
<v Speaker 1>thank you Tim Gordon for defending the one true Church

1132
01:01:30.400 --> 01:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that Jesus founded on the Prince of the Apostle, Saint Peter.

1133
01:01:33.760 --> 01:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>May all least an Orthodox become Catholics, so we may

1134
01:01:36.280 --> 01:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be in one holy Catholic and Apostolic church. We also

1135
01:01:39.880 --> 01:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>read the ones here from Maximus Decimus said keep my

1136
01:01:43.519 --> 01:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>name out of your mouth, little boy, shout out for

1137
01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>our supreme leader, Jay Dyer, Christ is King. All right,

1138
01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give a one more minute here to read

1139
01:01:50.840 --> 01:01:53.599
<v Speaker 1>a couple super chats before we get to the closing statements.

1140
01:01:53.639 --> 01:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Servant Necros is thirty three cent, huge respect for Jay.

1141
01:01:56.400 --> 01:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Keep it up my brother now the Aldohyan and also

1142
01:02:00.280 --> 01:02:02.119
<v Speaker 1>said Tim makes you sleep in Elijah is using groc

1143
01:02:02.360 --> 01:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the most rigorous debate I have ever seen.

1144
01:02:04.639 --> 01:02:05.079
<v Speaker 2>It's truth.

1145
01:02:05.119 --> 01:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't use I don't use AI, but I had

1146
01:02:06.480 --> 01:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to use ad a lookup some of the stuff you

1147
01:02:07.760 --> 01:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying in real time. Also, we have missed a

1148
01:02:11.760 --> 01:02:14.159
<v Speaker 1>fist and said I'm too subtarted to understand any of this.

1149
01:02:14.480 --> 01:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But Orthodox have better hats, which settles it. A tree

1150
01:02:17.400 --> 01:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>will be known by its fruit. Come home, Papists. So

1151
01:02:20.079 --> 01:02:21.559
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we got a pretty good split in

1152
01:02:21.559 --> 01:02:24.199
<v Speaker 1>between there. Right, let's move into the closing statement. Just

1153
01:02:24.199 --> 01:02:26.039
<v Speaker 1>so you guys know watching at home, we will be

1154
01:02:26.039 --> 01:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>taking a five minute break between each of our topics.

1155
01:02:28.800 --> 01:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So you can use the restroom, you can breathe, and

1156
01:02:30.719 --> 01:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it might be a couple of minutes, so don't go anywhere.

1157
01:02:33.119 --> 01:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start with our closing statement. If you guys

1158
01:02:35.679 --> 01:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are John, are you prepared and are you prepared to go?

1159
01:02:38.320 --> 01:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jay, you're gonna have ten minutes on the clock.

1160
01:02:41.199 --> 01:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>You do have an extra minut would you want to

1161
01:02:42.559 --> 01:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>use it here on a future topic?

1162
01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:48.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll say that. Okay, soat we're doing closing statements for

1163
01:02:48.400 --> 01:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>each topic. Well, that's the forumt that I was handed here,

1164
01:02:52.039 --> 01:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>unless you like to do a closing statement overall. I

1165
01:02:53.840 --> 01:02:57.039
<v Speaker 2>thought we were doing overall. But what I defer to

1166
01:02:57.079 --> 01:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you if you want to do, that's your figure. That's

1167
01:02:59.480 --> 01:03:00.159
<v Speaker 2>gonna be really.

1168
01:03:01.880 --> 01:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>What about brief? Yeah, why we just want we'll just

1169
01:03:04.360 --> 01:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do a three minute wrap up because I think that's

1170
01:03:07.920 --> 01:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of us. Just a reminder, because this

1171
01:03:09.840 --> 01:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is an internet debate. While there are a lot of theologians,

1172
01:03:11.840 --> 01:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>some people may have gotten lost in there. So maybe

1173
01:03:13.719 --> 01:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep to understanding to help us understand what your

1174
01:03:16.360 --> 01:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>final statement was. You have three minutes on the clock.

1175
01:03:18.679 --> 01:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Will make it brief and we'll have a complete one

1176
01:03:20.519 --> 01:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Go ahead, Jay, your time starts now.

1177
01:03:23.800 --> 01:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1178
01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:27.639
<v Speaker 3>I want to remind everybody that again, I think if

1179
01:03:27.679 --> 01:03:32.199
<v Speaker 3>you are familiar with Biblical theology, the Patristic teaching, nobody

1180
01:03:32.239 --> 01:03:35.559
<v Speaker 3>believes that the glory of God is in any sense

1181
01:03:35.599 --> 01:03:39.480
<v Speaker 3>a creature or created. In fact, it is the uncreated

1182
01:03:39.519 --> 01:03:42.119
<v Speaker 3>immortality and light that Paul talks about at the end

1183
01:03:42.119 --> 01:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>of Timothy, in which God eternally dwells that uncreated light

1184
01:03:45.920 --> 01:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>in glory was manifested in Matthew seventeen on the mount

1185
01:03:49.400 --> 01:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>of transfiguration through the human nature of Christ.

1186
01:03:52.480 --> 01:03:54.559
<v Speaker 2>And so it is precisely this crucial.

1187
01:03:54.239 --> 01:03:59.079
<v Speaker 3>Mistake that's made amongst the Catholic friends of ours that

1188
01:03:59.239 --> 01:04:02.079
<v Speaker 3>they think that this in some way will violate these

1189
01:04:02.079 --> 01:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>basic metaphysical principles. But in fact we have a reverse

1190
01:04:05.320 --> 01:04:09.480
<v Speaker 3>system that we derive our theology first, in our metaphysics second.

1191
01:04:09.599 --> 01:04:12.039
<v Speaker 2>This is what allowed the Church Fathers to be.

1192
01:04:13.480 --> 01:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Pretty fluid with the way that they appropriated the philosophy

1193
01:04:17.480 --> 01:04:18.079
<v Speaker 3>of their day.

1194
01:04:18.559 --> 01:04:19.639
<v Speaker 2>As the zach Kuber.

1195
01:04:19.400 --> 01:04:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Book notes, the Church Fathers are able to in some

1196
01:04:22.360 --> 01:04:25.119
<v Speaker 3>places pull from Arisothean logic text, but for the most

1197
01:04:25.119 --> 01:04:28.679
<v Speaker 3>part they utilize a lot of neoplatonic argumentation. At least

1198
01:04:28.719 --> 01:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>up until John Damascus, who then does use a lot

1199
01:04:31.039 --> 01:04:32.519
<v Speaker 3>more Aristotilian argumentation.

1200
01:04:33.039 --> 01:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>So what that shows is that for us, it's not.

1201
01:04:34.920 --> 01:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>A question of Aristotle versus Plato, but rather divine revelation,

1202
01:04:38.679 --> 01:04:42.199
<v Speaker 3>as Father Fluorowsky says, which comes first and foremost. And

1203
01:04:42.239 --> 01:04:47.079
<v Speaker 3>that's why, for example, when Aquinas in on a de vertate,

1204
01:04:47.239 --> 01:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>when he talks about the section on divine simplicity, when

1205
01:04:49.960 --> 01:04:54.079
<v Speaker 3>he rejects John Damascus's essence energy argument, which shows by

1206
01:04:54.079 --> 01:04:56.719
<v Speaker 3>the way that John Damascus is actually making the same

1207
01:04:56.840 --> 01:04:59.519
<v Speaker 3>essence energy arguments that I'm making, which is precisely why

1208
01:04:59.519 --> 01:05:01.559
<v Speaker 3>they were present in all the cab Dootionans, why I

1209
01:05:01.679 --> 01:05:05.159
<v Speaker 3>was present in Saint Cyril, and it's even present in St.

1210
01:05:05.199 --> 01:05:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Anthonasius himself.

1211
01:05:06.159 --> 01:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>If you read Fluorowsky's essay on Creation and Creaturehood about

1212
01:05:09.440 --> 01:05:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the essenceentary distinction in sant Athenasius even you'll notice that

1213
01:05:13.400 --> 01:05:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Aquandas's rejection has nothing to do with what the actual

1214
01:05:17.199 --> 01:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Patristic teaching is. In fact, he says in on the contrary. Moreover,

1215
01:05:22.400 --> 01:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Rabbi my Minides notes that the names of God do

1216
01:05:27.119 --> 01:05:31.039
<v Speaker 3>not signify intentions added to the substance of God, because

1217
01:05:31.079 --> 01:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>every accident signifies an intention added to the substance of

1218
01:05:34.840 --> 01:05:38.639
<v Speaker 3>its subject. Therefore, the foregoing names do not signify an accident.

1219
01:05:38.679 --> 01:05:39.119
<v Speaker 2>In God.

1220
01:05:39.519 --> 01:05:43.159
<v Speaker 3>We simply don't have the two tiered metaphysical collapse structure

1221
01:05:43.519 --> 01:05:46.679
<v Speaker 3>that He has, which nobody in the first seven hundred

1222
01:05:46.760 --> 01:05:48.559
<v Speaker 3>years of the Patristic teaching has either.

1223
01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>So the attempt to categorize.

1224
01:05:51.039 --> 01:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>The energies as accidental or in some way hearts or

1225
01:05:54.360 --> 01:05:56.639
<v Speaker 3>something like that was never an argument that I made,

1226
01:05:56.840 --> 01:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>nor did any of the Eastern trust Fathers make it.

1227
01:05:58.800 --> 01:06:02.119
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, if you the dissutation with Piis which

1228
01:06:02.320 --> 01:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>is the theology of Saint Maximus that goes into the

1229
01:06:05.039 --> 01:06:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Confession of Saint Sophronius, which is accepted at the six

1230
01:06:07.559 --> 01:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Ecumenical Council, that whole treatise, it's about one hundred pages,

1231
01:06:12.480 --> 01:06:16.679
<v Speaker 3>is a treatise utilizing all the same essence energy arguments

1232
01:06:16.719 --> 01:06:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that I make against the monothelite monophysite position that is

1233
01:06:21.320 --> 01:06:24.280
<v Speaker 3>accepted in the Confession of Saint Sophronius at the sixth

1234
01:06:24.280 --> 01:06:28.199
<v Speaker 3>Econminical Council, and even Pope Agatho in his letter admits

1235
01:06:28.519 --> 01:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>two wills and two energies in Christ and so when

1236
01:06:31.719 --> 01:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>when Tim said that inner gaia means something very different

1237
01:06:35.800 --> 01:06:38.679
<v Speaker 3>in the Bible, it's not metaphysical. He then goes on

1238
01:06:38.760 --> 01:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to give this elaborate ussiological story about what it's all

1239
01:06:44.920 --> 01:06:48.239
<v Speaker 3>really meaning, doing the very opposite of what I'm doing,

1240
01:06:48.280 --> 01:06:50.639
<v Speaker 3>which is looking at the text when it says that

1241
01:06:50.679 --> 01:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Moses walked up on the mountain and God's glory was

1242
01:06:54.360 --> 01:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>shown to him, his goodnesses, and by the way, it's

1243
01:06:57.360 --> 01:07:01.159
<v Speaker 3>plural there the goodnesses of God are shown. And yet

1244
01:07:01.239 --> 01:07:03.679
<v Speaker 3>Jesus says in John five, no one saw the Father

1245
01:07:03.760 --> 01:07:06.360
<v Speaker 3>at any time. Well, it's not the energies that are

1246
01:07:06.440 --> 01:07:09.239
<v Speaker 3>manifesting in time and space. It is the person of

1247
01:07:09.280 --> 01:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the Son, who is the face of the Father in

1248
01:07:11.920 --> 01:07:13.199
<v Speaker 3>time and space, and.

1249
01:07:13.119 --> 01:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>It is his energies that are manifest sacing.

1250
01:07:15.519 --> 01:07:19.039
<v Speaker 3>So he misunderstood, especially when he was talking about the

1251
01:07:19.079 --> 01:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Angel of the Lord, who is obviously the person of

1252
01:07:21.480 --> 01:07:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Christ in time and space in the Theophany. So I

1253
01:07:24.039 --> 01:07:26.440
<v Speaker 3>think that that Theophanees really clenches the whole argument.

1254
01:07:26.679 --> 01:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, it was forty seconds over, but we'll give

1255
01:07:28.880 --> 01:07:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you the minute bleed. Go ahead.

1256
01:07:30.360 --> 01:07:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put the same amount of time then that

1257
01:07:32.239 --> 01:07:34.679
<v Speaker 1>he had let me reset the clock. You'll have four

1258
01:07:34.719 --> 01:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>minutes since he had four. Go ahead, Timothy, give us

1259
01:07:37.559 --> 01:07:39.239
<v Speaker 1>your closing statement on the topic.

1260
01:07:39.280 --> 01:07:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Here on the simplicity, you see the devastation to the

1261
01:07:43.840 --> 01:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>EO position when you look at scripture on the beatific vision.

1262
01:07:48.800 --> 01:07:51.719
<v Speaker 2>In First John, it says we shall see Him as

1263
01:07:51.800 --> 01:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>he is. That would mean the divine essence at the

1264
01:07:55.519 --> 01:07:59.119
<v Speaker 2>end of time. Blessed are the pure in heart. Or

1265
01:07:59.159 --> 01:08:02.360
<v Speaker 2>they shall see God. This is Matthew chapter five, verse eight.

1266
01:08:02.400 --> 01:08:05.199
<v Speaker 2>They shall see God, not the works of God or

1267
01:08:05.239 --> 01:08:09.159
<v Speaker 2>the energeias of God. They will not see his energies.

1268
01:08:09.159 --> 01:08:11.679
<v Speaker 2>They will see God himself. This is the problem. This

1269
01:08:11.719 --> 01:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>is the teleology of the good life. This is what

1270
01:08:14.800 --> 01:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>we're promised. And they say otherwise, they say we will

1271
01:08:17.680 --> 01:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>never see God in his essence. All we can ever

1272
01:08:20.479 --> 01:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>see are the energaias of God's same as what we

1273
01:08:22.880 --> 01:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>see on earth. It's absurd. If we never see God's essence,

1274
01:08:28.640 --> 01:08:31.279
<v Speaker 2>we never reach full union with him. Also, so this

1275
01:08:31.399 --> 01:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>is really really important to draw. It's it's absolutely theologically

1276
01:08:35.800 --> 01:08:43.079
<v Speaker 2>and teleologically devastating, and it's a fatalistic worldview. Very very important. Now, Glory.

1277
01:08:43.399 --> 01:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>When Jay was asking me about glory, and he's spit

1278
01:08:45.800 --> 01:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>firing questions at me. Glory is a created reality. The

1279
01:08:50.720 --> 01:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>way we experience it, the way we're talking about it,

1280
01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:57.079
<v Speaker 2>the way it's predicated. Analogically, it's glory in our soul,

1281
01:08:57.159 --> 01:09:03.279
<v Speaker 2>in our intellects, and our participation in it is created

1282
01:09:03.640 --> 01:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and therefore the way we interact with God's glory. Again,

1283
01:09:08.560 --> 01:09:12.239
<v Speaker 2>this is a virtual distinction because it involves the way

1284
01:09:12.279 --> 01:09:16.159
<v Speaker 2>that we receive it in interact with it in the

1285
01:09:16.159 --> 01:09:20.479
<v Speaker 2>mode of the receiver us creatures. It's of course has

1286
01:09:20.520 --> 01:09:23.479
<v Speaker 2>to be created. A created glory has to interact with

1287
01:09:23.520 --> 01:09:27.119
<v Speaker 2>creatures as it exists in God, it is uncreated. But

1288
01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:31.560
<v Speaker 2>we don't know glory from the side of God because

1289
01:09:31.640 --> 01:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>glory from the side of God remains uncreated until the

1290
01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>be a typic vision. The most important thing he was

1291
01:09:37.840 --> 01:09:42.359
<v Speaker 2>asking about the Theophanes and Jay's claim. He'll say, the

1292
01:09:42.359 --> 01:09:47.199
<v Speaker 2>Theophanes are this easy, easy proof that passive potency can

1293
01:09:47.239 --> 01:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>exist in God, which is a non sequitur. It's absurd,

1294
01:09:50.119 --> 01:09:53.439
<v Speaker 2>says there's a distinction between the inner, unrevealed aspect of God,

1295
01:09:53.560 --> 01:09:56.439
<v Speaker 2>his essence, and what he reveals and manifests us his

1296
01:09:56.520 --> 01:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>divine personal energies. A Theophany. Like I said before, it's

1297
01:10:01.640 --> 01:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>a it's a created sign or instrument of uncreated presence.

1298
01:10:08.039 --> 01:10:12.359
<v Speaker 2>The change is in the medium, not in God himself.

1299
01:10:12.479 --> 01:10:15.560
<v Speaker 2>So this does not even begin to prove that God

1300
01:10:15.960 --> 01:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>is not pure actor, that God can change. Particularly, I

1301
01:10:19.760 --> 01:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>thought Jay was going to come on this first segment

1302
01:10:22.840 --> 01:10:26.319
<v Speaker 2>and distinguish, well, God can change because he has active power,

1303
01:10:26.439 --> 01:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>active potensia. Well that's true, but he's the unmoved mover.

1304
01:10:29.560 --> 01:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>He can he can act on things without them being

1305
01:10:31.840 --> 01:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>acted on him. But he he came on and defended

1306
01:10:36.399 --> 01:10:40.119
<v Speaker 2>God as passive potency. And this just doesn't begin to

1307
01:10:40.159 --> 01:10:47.319
<v Speaker 2>be shown by the fact that the Theophanes have taken

1308
01:10:47.359 --> 01:10:54.319
<v Speaker 2>place as signs and instruments that are created. Worship is

1309
01:10:54.359 --> 01:11:00.079
<v Speaker 2>something funny. Worship belongs to the divine nature alone. This

1310
01:11:00.119 --> 01:11:04.479
<v Speaker 2>is from Second Constantinople. But not if we take Jay

1311
01:11:04.560 --> 01:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>at his word, worship Second Constantinople belongs to the divine

1312
01:11:09.439 --> 01:11:15.159
<v Speaker 2>nature alone. So that that's really important, I mean the most.

1313
01:11:15.760 --> 01:11:18.840
<v Speaker 2>The heart of this issue is whether or not passive

1314
01:11:18.920 --> 01:11:23.199
<v Speaker 2>potencies can be allowed within God. And this would simply

1315
01:11:23.319 --> 01:11:28.039
<v Speaker 2>destroy all of classical theism. God would change, He wouldn't

1316
01:11:28.039 --> 01:11:31.279
<v Speaker 2>be immutable. He wouldn't be eternal. This is anathematized it,

1317
01:11:31.319 --> 01:11:33.199
<v Speaker 2>and I see it. If God had passive potency, he

1318
01:11:33.199 --> 01:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be simply wouldn't be perfect. I mean, I'm restating

1319
01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.760
<v Speaker 2>what I said in opening because it's so very basic

1320
01:11:39.800 --> 01:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's so devastating to what we believe about God.

1321
01:11:42.800 --> 01:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>If we believe that God, if we were to allow

1322
01:11:44.680 --> 01:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>ourselves to believe that God had passive post I still

1323
01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:47.479
<v Speaker 2>have a minute.

1324
01:11:47.840 --> 01:11:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you want to want to have the minute

1325
01:11:49.159 --> 01:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>on the clock right now, all right, give me one moment.

1326
01:11:51.159 --> 01:11:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Let me reset the clock. Give you a minute and

1327
01:11:53.439 --> 01:11:54.159
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and take that.

1328
01:11:54.600 --> 01:11:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just want to address in this minute the

1329
01:11:56.600 --> 01:11:59.199
<v Speaker 3>fact that I mean, he doesn't seem to be aware

1330
01:11:59.239 --> 01:12:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that the Theophanes are called God, they're given the name Yahweh,

1331
01:12:05.199 --> 01:12:09.560
<v Speaker 3>they're worshiped, and they're pre signifiers of the incarnation. So

1332
01:12:09.600 --> 01:12:14.159
<v Speaker 3>he's literally saying that these signs and symbols can be worshiped.

1333
01:12:14.199 --> 01:12:16.319
<v Speaker 3>So he believes that you can worship creatures. Then he

1334
01:12:16.359 --> 01:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>turns around and contradicts himself because he says that only

1335
01:12:18.680 --> 01:12:20.039
<v Speaker 3>divine nature can be worshiped.

1336
01:12:20.880 --> 01:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>The triad is worshiped.

1337
01:12:22.600 --> 01:12:25.359
<v Speaker 3>And it doesn't say only the divine nature is worshiped,

1338
01:12:25.439 --> 01:12:28.399
<v Speaker 3>but we worship God in Triad. That's the actual definition

1339
01:12:28.439 --> 01:12:31.119
<v Speaker 3>of the council doesn't say only divine nature. So I

1340
01:12:31.119 --> 01:12:34.159
<v Speaker 3>think it's just kind of insane to me that that,

1341
01:12:34.800 --> 01:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>like how far removed from divine revelation that position actually is.

1342
01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:41.159
<v Speaker 2>And again, as I said in.

1343
01:12:41.079 --> 01:12:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Philippians too, if God is a being that is reducible

1344
01:12:44.600 --> 01:12:48.359
<v Speaker 3>to pure act, then it's not possible for the self

1345
01:12:48.399 --> 01:12:53.640
<v Speaker 3>emptying or the limiting to occur in the incarnation when

1346
01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:56.119
<v Speaker 3>the Sun, according to Filippians to in the Canosis passage

1347
01:12:56.399 --> 01:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>willfully limits himself. A being that is pure act according

1348
01:12:59.800 --> 01:13:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to definition reducibly would undergo change via Philippians too, And

1349
01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>we don't believe.

1350
01:13:05.560 --> 01:13:08.399
<v Speaker 2>That can have a minitary respondent. No where you're you're

1351
01:13:08.439 --> 01:13:09.159
<v Speaker 2>over on that one.

1352
01:13:09.600 --> 01:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You can't actually still in the other topics if you'd

1353
01:13:11.920 --> 01:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like to, you can always address technically if you like

1354
01:13:13.600 --> 01:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to take a little bit of time to bring back

1355
01:13:15.479 --> 01:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>some points, I do want to mind you, guys, we're

1356
01:13:16.960 --> 01:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a break here in a second, so that

1357
01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're dis joining right now in the live stream,

1358
01:13:21.640 --> 01:13:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we are in the middle of debating some of the

1359
01:13:23.560 --> 01:13:27.159
<v Speaker 1>core dogmas theological concepts, depending on where you come from

1360
01:13:27.159 --> 01:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and what wording you like to use. Of Orthodoxy and

1361
01:13:29.840 --> 01:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Catholicism in terms of the Church itself, not the Orthodoxy

1362
01:13:32.880 --> 01:13:35.479
<v Speaker 1>of religion, Orthodoxy of faith, or the Gospel, but of

1363
01:13:35.520 --> 01:13:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the approach and of the Church. That being said, if

1364
01:13:38.359 --> 01:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys are sending super chats, I just want to

1365
01:13:40.840 --> 01:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>remind you guys a couple of things. We have a

1366
01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:45.239
<v Speaker 1>few more people in here. Mista also said that it's

1367
01:13:45.239 --> 01:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much beyond him. We also have

1368
01:13:47.039 --> 01:13:51.239
<v Speaker 1>some win Titus, win Hadrian. We also have a l

1369
01:13:51.439 --> 01:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>chemist said, depending on Gordon's performance, tonight might be Jay's

1370
01:13:54.479 --> 01:13:59.039
<v Speaker 1>third conversion to Catholicism and second denunciation of the Orthodox Church.

1371
01:13:59.319 --> 01:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Curious to know which way the wind swayed him tonight.

1372
01:14:02.720 --> 01:14:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh, Sigilists said Orthodox equals divine person, Catholic equals divine robot.

1373
01:14:08.800 --> 01:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We also have a servant, said Hard passed on trusting

1374
01:14:11.680 --> 01:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a church founded on forgeries. I'm not sure that's in Australia,

1375
01:14:15.520 --> 01:14:18.039
<v Speaker 1>and shout out to my Aussies. I just got banned

1376
01:14:18.079 --> 01:14:21.159
<v Speaker 1>from Australia. Unfortunately, I don't even know what the currency

1377
01:14:21.199 --> 01:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>AARs is, but uh, buddy, Pep nine seven three said

1378
01:14:24.960 --> 01:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tim has been forsake and everyone got to donate to

1379
01:14:27.039 --> 01:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the stream where y'all are Yukubians.

1380
01:14:30.560 --> 01:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Really, we're all did you cube made us?

1381
01:14:32.640 --> 01:14:35.079
<v Speaker 1>I remember you said that, right, Yeah, you're all creating

1382
01:14:35.079 --> 01:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the image of a cube.

1383
01:14:36.039 --> 01:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>You're learning the right religion now, yeah, finally yeah, And.

1384
01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And a grand canon is a portal, that's what they say. Uh,

1385
01:14:43.279 --> 01:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Techno Ox said, let's go, not one step back.

1386
01:14:47.640 --> 01:14:48.159
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

1387
01:14:48.279 --> 01:14:50.239
<v Speaker 1>We also have a few more that we'll read in

1388
01:14:50.279 --> 01:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but let's join and let's jump into a

1389
01:14:52.800 --> 01:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>quick break. We're taking a couple of minute break here,

1390
01:14:54.840 --> 01:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just a reset. They're gonna reset their books, their notes,

1391
01:14:57.920 --> 01:14:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna come back just to make sure I

1392
01:14:59.319 --> 01:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have it correct by the from you so that we

1393
01:15:00.720 --> 01:15:02.159
<v Speaker 1>don't make them no mistake.

1394
01:15:02.239 --> 01:15:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Again.

1395
01:15:03.319 --> 01:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>For the next topic that you wanted to cover, we

1396
01:15:06.640 --> 01:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are able to get into the Christ did not establish

1397
01:15:10.720 --> 01:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the papacy? Or did you want to go to the

1398
01:15:11.960 --> 01:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit? Does not have a do you want to

1399
01:15:14.960 --> 01:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the Holy Spirit?

1400
01:15:15.720 --> 01:15:19.039
<v Speaker 2>Question? Was it Philly? What do you want? He went first?

1401
01:15:19.039 --> 01:15:21.600
<v Speaker 2>You can pick the next topic. We'll be going first.

1402
01:15:21.640 --> 01:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine with either, but but Philly oquay would be

1403
01:15:24.119 --> 01:15:25.119
<v Speaker 2>would have more of them.

1404
01:15:25.199 --> 01:15:27.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go there, all right, So we'll be

1405
01:15:27.239 --> 01:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>back talking about that just a moment, and we'll be

1406
01:15:29.600 --> 01:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>starting opening statements with Timothy Gordon representing Catholicism. We'll see

1407
01:15:33.640 --> 01:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just a few moments, take a break, and we'll be

1408
01:15:34.880 --> 01:15:37.359
<v Speaker 1>right back in the Rumble section. That justays imagine Allied

1409
01:15:37.399 --> 01:15:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to trying to process all this when he couldn't even

1410
01:15:39.159 --> 01:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>get the sound started to start his live stream.

1411
01:15:42.720 --> 01:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely fantastic.

1412
01:15:44.039 --> 01:15:47.159
<v Speaker 1>We got a great debate going on today directly between

1413
01:15:47.319 --> 01:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Jay Dyer and Timothy Gordon. If you're just joining Live today,

1414
01:15:49.880 --> 01:15:54.439
<v Speaker 1>we are live on rumble x, Facebook and on YouTube.

1415
01:15:54.439 --> 01:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We can also find us on Instagram and Elijah Schaeffer

1416
01:15:57.359 --> 01:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dot locals dot com makes it if you want to

1417
01:16:00.680 --> 01:16:01.279
<v Speaker 1>know where we've been.

1418
01:16:01.359 --> 01:16:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I've been very sick.

1419
01:16:02.239 --> 01:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I was in El Salvador shooting content and then I

1420
01:16:05.039 --> 01:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>end up picking up a stomach bug from a taco stand.

1421
01:16:07.920 --> 01:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I love the country, but don't eat pork from strangers

1422
01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:12.079
<v Speaker 1>in developing countries.

1423
01:16:12.119 --> 01:16:14.399
<v Speaker 2>That's just a little a little tip for tat there.

1424
01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:17.119
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be jumping into our next topic today on

1425
01:16:17.199 --> 01:16:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the overarching discussion of orthodox is in the Church itself

1426
01:16:22.760 --> 01:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and Catholicism as in the church and the dogma. If

1427
01:16:26.039 --> 01:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you're joining me today on YouTube, make sure that you

1428
01:16:27.920 --> 01:16:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like the video right now and subscribe to We are

1429
01:16:30.359 --> 01:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a brand news show, still working out the kinks, just

1430
01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple months old, and absolutely fantastic and excited because

1431
01:16:36.920 --> 01:16:41.079
<v Speaker 1>we are a network riftv dot com not influenced by

1432
01:16:41.359 --> 01:16:45.039
<v Speaker 1>outside countries like Israel, and that's our claim to fame

1433
01:16:45.079 --> 01:16:46.439
<v Speaker 1>here and so we really appreciate that.

1434
01:16:47.079 --> 01:16:52.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, We're gonna jump into the topic here, specifically

1435
01:16:52.359 --> 01:16:57.079
<v Speaker 2>about the Holy Spirit, and you know, we are asking ourselves,

1436
01:16:57.079 --> 01:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>does it or does it not hyposthetically proceed from the sun.

1437
01:17:00.039 --> 01:17:02.399
<v Speaker 2>So this is a very complex topic.

1438
01:17:02.439 --> 01:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get intricate, it is going to get

1439
01:17:04.720 --> 01:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely incredibly in many ways incredibly technical, and so again

1440
01:17:09.720 --> 01:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I encourage you guys to please have your your notes

1441
01:17:13.800 --> 01:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>out and be ready to discuss. Our guests are of

1442
01:17:16.800 --> 01:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>agreed to doing ten minute opening statements and they will

1443
01:17:20.560 --> 01:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>have a minute bleed if they so choose. We're going

1444
01:17:24.199 --> 01:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to start with Timothy Gordon. The time is on the clock.

1445
01:17:28.079 --> 01:17:31.079
<v Speaker 1>You have ten minutes. You can start now.

1446
01:17:33.479 --> 01:17:37.720
<v Speaker 2>So the second question tonight is nothing less than the

1447
01:17:37.920 --> 01:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>unity of the Trinity. Does the Holy Spirit proceed from

1448
01:17:41.880 --> 01:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the Father alone or from both the Father and the

1449
01:17:43.880 --> 01:17:48.079
<v Speaker 2>Son together is one eternal source. This is called the philioquay.

1450
01:17:48.199 --> 01:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>It means and the Son. The Catholic position is that

1451
01:17:52.199 --> 01:17:55.079
<v Speaker 2>the Holy Spirit proceeds from the person of the Father

1452
01:17:55.359 --> 01:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>through the person of the Son. Brief historical note, there's

1453
01:18:02.039 --> 01:18:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a semantic dodge that happens with Orthodox The narrative proves

1454
01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:13.680
<v Speaker 2>how absurdly reactive the Orthodox position is against the Catholic position.

1455
01:18:14.039 --> 01:18:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Or early on, there are a couple of thinkers. One

1456
01:18:17.680 --> 01:18:21.439
<v Speaker 2>is named Photius. The other is Michael Ceriularius, who was

1457
01:18:21.560 --> 01:18:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the patriarch during the Schism, who mistakenly thought that the

1458
01:18:26.920 --> 01:18:32.079
<v Speaker 2>Catholic philioque meant a polyarchic generation of the divine essence,

1459
01:18:32.119 --> 01:18:35.159
<v Speaker 2>meaning that both the Father and the Son like generate

1460
01:18:35.239 --> 01:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the essence as it comes to the Spirit, which has

1461
01:18:39.039 --> 01:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>never been the Catholic position. It's the Catholic position has

1462
01:18:41.920 --> 01:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>always been monarchic. The Father alone generates it through the

1463
01:18:48.840 --> 01:18:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Son it comes to the Holy Spirit. So so together

1464
01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:56.079
<v Speaker 2>these thinkers, who are separated by about two hundred and

1465
01:18:56.079 --> 01:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>fifty years, Photius and Cerularius together reduced the Orthodox position

1466
01:19:01.199 --> 01:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to the view for for a time that the Spirit

1467
01:19:03.720 --> 01:19:10.439
<v Speaker 2>proceeded from the Sun only economically or temporarily. By the

1468
01:19:10.479 --> 01:19:14.039
<v Speaker 2>time they realized their error in interpretation in the late

1469
01:19:14.119 --> 01:19:18.960
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth century, the Eastern Orthodox, they're already committed to schism,

1470
01:19:19.359 --> 01:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and so even though they became willing to admit that

1471
01:19:21.560 --> 01:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>the Spirit proceeded from the Sun eternally and this is

1472
01:19:25.439 --> 01:19:30.359
<v Speaker 2>an eternal relationship, they maintained some linguistic distance from the

1473
01:19:30.399 --> 01:19:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Catholic position, which is called hypostatic procession. It means a

1474
01:19:34.119 --> 01:19:39.399
<v Speaker 2>procession from the person by use of nonsensical language like

1475
01:19:39.479 --> 01:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>eternal manifestation, which is either a distinction without a difference

1476
01:19:43.960 --> 01:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>from the Roman Catholic view and we're the same all along,

1477
01:19:47.880 --> 01:19:52.159
<v Speaker 2>or else it's nonsensical here. I'm on this one topic

1478
01:19:52.199 --> 01:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>of three. I'm very willing to be persuaded, but it

1479
01:19:55.359 --> 01:19:58.159
<v Speaker 2>seems just like a semantic dodge. They don't want to

1480
01:19:58.199 --> 01:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>have the Catholic view. By the time the Eastern Orthodox

1481
01:20:01.399 --> 01:20:05.079
<v Speaker 2>realized that, Photius in around eight hundred and Ceriularius around

1482
01:20:05.119 --> 01:20:08.239
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty years later, badly misunderstood the philioque

1483
01:20:08.279 --> 01:20:12.239
<v Speaker 2>and created this whole stink they decide. It seems they

1484
01:20:12.279 --> 01:20:15.239
<v Speaker 2>decided to employ the semantic dodge rather than admit the

1485
01:20:15.239 --> 01:20:20.199
<v Speaker 2>air of these two thinkers. So it depends what's being said.

1486
01:20:20.319 --> 01:20:26.119
<v Speaker 2>If the Father alone truly spirates, truly spirates the Spirit,

1487
01:20:26.239 --> 01:20:31.279
<v Speaker 2>then it becomes nonsensical. It would deny that all the

1488
01:20:31.319 --> 01:20:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Father has belongs to the Son, which is a quote

1489
01:20:35.199 --> 01:20:39.279
<v Speaker 2>directly from scripture. From John's Gospel, it severs the eternal

1490
01:20:39.319 --> 01:20:45.079
<v Speaker 2>relation of the Spirit to the Son, which again Jesus says,

1491
01:20:45.119 --> 01:20:49.199
<v Speaker 2>all that the Father has I have. In this sense,

1492
01:20:49.319 --> 01:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Scripture strongly supports philioka, which is, the Father gives the

1493
01:20:54.840 --> 01:20:59.119
<v Speaker 2>divine essence to the Holy Spirit through the Son. The

1494
01:20:59.159 --> 01:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>spirit is called the spirit of the Son in Galatians

1495
01:21:01.920 --> 01:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>chapter four, verse six. In Romans chapter eight, verse nine,

1496
01:21:06.039 --> 01:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Christ breathes the spirit. In John chapter twenty, verse twenty two,

1497
01:21:09.640 --> 01:21:13.960
<v Speaker 2>this is an image of external procession. I think they'll

1498
01:21:13.960 --> 01:21:17.359
<v Speaker 2>say it's strictly economic. But he's breathing the spirit, and

1499
01:21:17.399 --> 01:21:22.239
<v Speaker 2>it's an eternal relation. When Jesus says all that the

1500
01:21:22.279 --> 01:21:27.039
<v Speaker 2>Father has is mine. John chapter sixteen, verse fifteen, nothing

1501
01:21:27.119 --> 01:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is excluded from the sun the river of life. In

1502
01:21:32.159 --> 01:21:37.079
<v Speaker 2>the final Book of the Bible Revelation twenty two, verse one,

1503
01:21:37.399 --> 01:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the river of life flows from the throne of the

1504
01:21:39.760 --> 01:21:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Father and the Lamb. This has only one possible meaning

1505
01:21:44.600 --> 01:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that I can construe most condemningly, and there is a

1506
01:21:49.600 --> 01:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of equivocal language here. And again I think there's

1507
01:21:52.399 --> 01:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the least difference between our two positions of all these

1508
01:21:56.560 --> 01:21:59.880
<v Speaker 2>three topics by far. I would say that the Eastern

1509
01:22:00.159 --> 01:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox thinkers, or Eastern thinkers of the first millennium, many

1510
01:22:04.760 --> 01:22:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of them largely support it. Cyril of Alexandria says spirit

1511
01:22:08.720 --> 01:22:11.439
<v Speaker 2>is from God in the Sun and through the Son.

1512
01:22:11.920 --> 01:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>That's an Eastern thinker. Saint Maximus the Confessor says, outright,

1513
01:22:17.039 --> 01:22:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the Latins are correct. They mean from the Father through

1514
01:22:20.520 --> 01:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Son. Saint Basil and Gregory of Nissa both say

1515
01:22:25.800 --> 01:22:29.039
<v Speaker 2>almost identically, all God's works are from the Father through

1516
01:22:29.039 --> 01:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the Son in the spirit. Saint John Damascene gives an

1517
01:22:33.920 --> 01:22:36.239
<v Speaker 2>amazing image for all of it, for anybody out there

1518
01:22:36.239 --> 01:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that's trying to think about it. This is an amazing

1519
01:22:38.680 --> 01:22:43.239
<v Speaker 2>image and it captures both the medium and the substance

1520
01:22:43.319 --> 01:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of the way that I believe the philioque works. He says,

1521
01:22:45.840 --> 01:22:48.079
<v Speaker 2>the Father is the source the Sun is a river,

1522
01:22:48.359 --> 01:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the Holy Spirit is a lake. The spirit quote proceeds

1523
01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>from the Father and rests in the Sun. Saint Gregory

1524
01:22:56.560 --> 01:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of Nissa writes, every operation which extend from God to

1525
01:23:00.800 --> 01:23:04.119
<v Speaker 2>creation has its origin from the Father, proceeds through the Son,

1526
01:23:04.199 --> 01:23:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and is perfected in the Holy Spirit. This is very

1527
01:23:07.960 --> 01:23:11.239
<v Speaker 2>very close, very close to our view. None of these views,

1528
01:23:11.279 --> 01:23:14.239
<v Speaker 2>because of the abstrusity of the topic, are going to

1529
01:23:14.239 --> 01:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>be identical, particularly in the Early Church, but it's very

1530
01:23:17.119 --> 01:23:21.560
<v Speaker 2>close to what we're saying. A hypostatic procession, a procession

1531
01:23:22.319 --> 01:23:25.479
<v Speaker 2>of the Father through the person of the Son to

1532
01:23:25.560 --> 01:23:28.039
<v Speaker 2>the Spirit. But still only the Spirit only gets the

1533
01:23:28.039 --> 01:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>divine essence from one source. That source is the Father

1534
01:23:32.239 --> 01:23:36.479
<v Speaker 2>alone through through Jesus. As a reminder, Avenatia says, the

1535
01:23:36.479 --> 01:23:39.079
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit has to the Son the same proper relation

1536
01:23:39.319 --> 01:23:42.039
<v Speaker 2>as we have known the Son to have to the Father.

1537
01:23:42.159 --> 01:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So a nice relation of proportion. The Holy Spirit is

1538
01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>to the Son as the Son is to the Father.

1539
01:23:48.640 --> 01:23:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Gregory and Azienzas said, if there ever was a time

1540
01:23:51.399 --> 01:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>that the Father was not the Son was not. If

1541
01:23:53.640 --> 01:23:55.279
<v Speaker 2>ever there was a time when the Sun was not,

1542
01:23:55.439 --> 01:24:00.880
<v Speaker 2>then the Holy Spirit was not showing eternality through temporality,

1543
01:24:01.239 --> 01:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and Saint Epiphanius of Salamus says, the Spirit is from

1544
01:24:05.760 --> 01:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>the Father indeed, but he is not without the Son.

1545
01:24:08.319 --> 01:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>For if the spirit is of the Father, he is

1546
01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>also of the Son. For the Son says he will

1547
01:24:12.560 --> 01:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>receive from me. Ecumenical councils support this. It was not

1548
01:24:20.079 --> 01:24:23.039
<v Speaker 2>crystal clear until the fourth latter in council. The Spirit

1549
01:24:23.079 --> 01:24:27.960
<v Speaker 2>receives equally from both leons two, which takes place supposed

1550
01:24:27.960 --> 01:24:30.239
<v Speaker 2>to be the Reunion Council, the first Reunion Council in

1551
01:24:30.239 --> 01:24:32.880
<v Speaker 2>twelve seventy four, from the Father and the Son, as

1552
01:24:33.239 --> 01:24:37.640
<v Speaker 2>from one principle one spiration. There's equivocation on whether or

1553
01:24:37.720 --> 01:24:43.239
<v Speaker 2>not there's one principle at times there's just one principle,

1554
01:24:43.319 --> 01:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>one spiration through the Son. Florence in fourteen thirty nine,

1555
01:24:47.880 --> 01:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>which actually was the Reunion Council. The Catholic Church and

1556
01:24:51.680 --> 01:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the Orthodox Church did unify at the Florence Council, where

1557
01:24:58.159 --> 01:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>the Orthodox position thirty one the thirty three delegates said,

1558
01:25:01.720 --> 01:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>you are right on phillyoquay and on the papacy says

1559
01:25:07.039 --> 01:25:13.039
<v Speaker 2>spirit eternally from both one principal one spiration. Now scripturally,

1560
01:25:13.560 --> 01:25:16.159
<v Speaker 2>the spirit is sent by both the Father and the

1561
01:25:16.199 --> 01:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Son in John chapter fourteen, verse twenty six and in

1562
01:25:21.279 --> 01:25:27.520
<v Speaker 2>John chapter sixteen, verse seven. Logically speaking, this holds if

1563
01:25:27.520 --> 01:25:31.199
<v Speaker 2>the son cannot spirate, he is less than the Father,

1564
01:25:31.439 --> 01:25:38.199
<v Speaker 2>which is a semi arianist error. Unity requires it as well.

1565
01:25:38.479 --> 01:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Phillioquay preserves the Trinity's unity, denying it divides the Father

1566
01:25:43.119 --> 01:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and the Son. So I'd say this that you have

1567
01:25:47.920 --> 01:25:50.479
<v Speaker 2>to take this historical look at the Phillyoquay one because

1568
01:25:50.479 --> 01:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it's so dense, but also because the historical account is

1569
01:25:55.239 --> 01:25:59.119
<v Speaker 2>really really important. It seems that by the time the

1570
01:25:59.279 --> 01:26:03.479
<v Speaker 2>Orthodox real we weren't we Catholics did not the Latins

1571
01:26:03.479 --> 01:26:06.159
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the position on the filioqua that they were

1572
01:26:06.159 --> 01:26:10.199
<v Speaker 2>attributing to us. They did not want to admit that

1573
01:26:12.039 --> 01:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the position had being correct all along. So until this

1574
01:26:15.039 --> 01:26:19.920
<v Speaker 2>misunderstanding about what Western fathers meant began, the Eastern fathers

1575
01:26:19.960 --> 01:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>were comfortable with eternal relations between the Spirit and the Sun.

1576
01:26:25.600 --> 01:26:28.880
<v Speaker 2>It's called the Athenation model, after all, and Athenacious is

1577
01:26:28.920 --> 01:26:32.640
<v Speaker 2>an Eastern father. This is the Eastern formulation of the

1578
01:26:32.720 --> 01:26:36.960
<v Speaker 2>hypostatic procession, though they don't use the term hypostatic. In

1579
01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the sixth century, the formulation begins getting put into the Western,

1580
01:26:40.840 --> 01:26:45.319
<v Speaker 2>non Roman creeds, which makes the I guess East feel threatened.

1581
01:26:45.479 --> 01:26:48.199
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of natural tension at the time. In

1582
01:26:48.319 --> 01:26:52.199
<v Speaker 2>eight oh three, Charlemagne enthusiastically adds it to the creed.

1583
01:26:53.199 --> 01:26:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Frankish priests at the time say the creed this way

1584
01:26:56.640 --> 01:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Holy Land. And then in eight sixty nine,

1585
01:27:00.039 --> 01:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>this important date, Photius of Constantinople says the creed is heretical.

1586
01:27:04.920 --> 01:27:07.239
<v Speaker 2>He thinks that it means the Holy Spirit's essence in

1587
01:27:07.279 --> 01:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the Creed comes from two sources. This is just wrong.

1588
01:27:10.039 --> 01:27:14.079
<v Speaker 2>It's an embarrassment. He thought that the Catholic position was

1589
01:27:14.119 --> 01:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>one of Polyarchia. And it's probably why we're disagreeing about

1590
01:27:19.600 --> 01:27:25.359
<v Speaker 2>this today is because there's an error mate and a

1591
01:27:25.399 --> 01:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>misinterpretation of the Catholic position that's factual, with no account

1592
01:27:31.680 --> 01:27:35.279
<v Speaker 2>ever given for it by Photius or his people. He

1593
01:27:35.319 --> 01:27:37.560
<v Speaker 2>thinks it means the Holy Spirit's essence in the creed

1594
01:27:37.560 --> 01:27:40.479
<v Speaker 2>comes from two sources. To repeat for people out there,

1595
01:27:40.520 --> 01:27:43.479
<v Speaker 2>for those whom this is new, Photius says, the spirit

1596
01:27:43.560 --> 01:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>has no eternal relation with the Son, which is not

1597
01:27:47.039 --> 01:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe the Orthodox position today even only a historical

1598
01:27:51.479 --> 01:27:54.680
<v Speaker 2>temporal economic relation is what Photius was willing to say

1599
01:27:54.720 --> 01:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>because he knew he didn't want that Catholic view. Fifty four,

1600
01:28:00.680 --> 01:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Michael Cerularius revitalizes Photius is overreacting misunderstanding of the Philly. Okay,

1601
01:28:06.159 --> 01:28:08.199
<v Speaker 2>are we at time? You know we're at time? Okay,

1602
01:28:08.279 --> 01:28:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And I would say that this is a history of

1603
01:28:12.039 --> 01:28:15.399
<v Speaker 2>a misunderstanding without account ever taken.

1604
01:28:15.960 --> 01:28:19.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, going over in the chat you know, remember

1605
01:28:19.319 --> 01:28:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you guys, at any point if you think someone's cooking,

1606
01:28:22.319 --> 01:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it's always one in the chat for ja two in

1607
01:28:24.159 --> 01:28:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the chat for ten. We're gonna go over to Jay

1608
01:28:26.119 --> 01:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Dier at the Orthodox position on the Philly. Okay, if

1609
01:28:29.520 --> 01:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm even pronouncing that right, iings to pronounce that differently,

1610
01:28:31.640 --> 01:28:33.079
<v Speaker 1>So sorry for that.

1611
01:28:33.159 --> 01:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead and give us your opening statement. Yeah,

1612
01:28:37.600 --> 01:28:46.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Give you a second to set up your

1613
01:28:46.600 --> 01:28:48.399
<v Speaker 2>notes here, and do you wanna do you want to

1614
01:28:48.520 --> 01:28:50.560
<v Speaker 2>a couple of seconds here? Uh? No, I got it.

1615
01:28:50.960 --> 01:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll start your timer whenever you're ready. Let me

1616
01:28:53.600 --> 01:28:55.479
<v Speaker 1>know when you're ready to begin or so.

1617
01:28:55.479 --> 01:28:59.399
<v Speaker 3>The Orthodox doctrine is again going to flow out of

1618
01:28:59.399 --> 01:29:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the teaching of the Cappadocians, and particularly Constantinople one, which

1619
01:29:02.680 --> 01:29:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is the second Ecumenical Council. Keep that in mind, because

1620
01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:12.079
<v Speaker 3>second Ecamenical Council was called closed and confirmed outside.

1621
01:29:11.439 --> 01:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Of communion with Rome.

1622
01:29:12.720 --> 01:29:15.760
<v Speaker 3>At the time Saint Melidias of Antioch was the presiding bishop.

1623
01:29:15.760 --> 01:29:18.439
<v Speaker 3>He died outside of commune with Rome, and a few

1624
01:29:18.479 --> 01:29:22.279
<v Speaker 3>years later Rome eventually accepts that council as the dogmatic

1625
01:29:22.319 --> 01:29:26.279
<v Speaker 3>definition of the Church, supposedly. I want to before we

1626
01:29:26.319 --> 01:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>get into this, well, I'll just start here. In the

1627
01:29:28.680 --> 01:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox view, following the Cappadocians, there's a famous dictim of

1628
01:29:31.960 --> 01:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Gregor Nazianzus.

1629
01:29:33.039 --> 01:29:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Everything that the Father.

1630
01:29:33.960 --> 01:29:38.199
<v Speaker 3>Has, the son has likewise accept the causality. You'll notice

1631
01:29:38.199 --> 01:29:41.159
<v Speaker 3>that nowhere in that discussion did you hear a clear discussion,

1632
01:29:41.399 --> 01:29:44.479
<v Speaker 3>a clear explanation of what the Father is as the

1633
01:29:44.520 --> 01:29:48.560
<v Speaker 3>sole archade. The Father is the principal fount, the source,

1634
01:29:49.119 --> 01:29:55.439
<v Speaker 3>and the unorigin at beginning point of the triad. Thus,

1635
01:29:55.560 --> 01:29:59.600
<v Speaker 3>his hyposthetic property in Orthodox theology is is precisely to

1636
01:29:59.640 --> 01:30:03.119
<v Speaker 3>be picked out as cause. That's why, if you heard

1637
01:30:03.159 --> 01:30:05.279
<v Speaker 3>in the first part he made the huge mistake of

1638
01:30:05.319 --> 01:30:09.680
<v Speaker 3>calling the Divine Essence a say or autotheos or of

1639
01:30:09.760 --> 01:30:13.079
<v Speaker 3>himself or of itself. It is the Father alone, according

1640
01:30:13.119 --> 01:30:18.079
<v Speaker 3>to the Capitoian and constantin one teaching, that is God

1641
01:30:18.119 --> 01:30:18.840
<v Speaker 3>of himself.

1642
01:30:19.279 --> 01:30:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Why because the Son and the Spirit have.

1643
01:30:21.399 --> 01:30:25.039
<v Speaker 3>Their origin in the Father, in particularly the Father's essence.

1644
01:30:25.279 --> 01:30:27.479
<v Speaker 3>The Son and the Spirit thus do not possess and

1645
01:30:27.560 --> 01:30:31.880
<v Speaker 3>cannot possess, the Father's hypostatic property. And so Tim doesn't

1646
01:30:31.880 --> 01:30:33.960
<v Speaker 3>seem to be aware of what the Creed teaches. When

1647
01:30:33.960 --> 01:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the Creed says, I believe in one God, the Divine Essence,

1648
01:30:38.079 --> 01:30:41.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, it's actually one God, the Father. Tim appealed

1649
01:30:41.479 --> 01:30:44.239
<v Speaker 3>to monotheism, apparently not being aware of the fact that

1650
01:30:44.279 --> 01:30:48.319
<v Speaker 3>the word monotheism is a sixteen hundreds term. Maybe he's

1651
01:30:48.359 --> 01:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>not aware of the term that was used explicitly in

1652
01:30:50.920 --> 01:30:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the Creed and amongst all the Church fathers east and

1653
01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:56.000
<v Speaker 3>West for many years, and that is the monarchea in

1654
01:30:56.079 --> 01:30:59.159
<v Speaker 3>the Greek. The monarchia of the Father is the beginning

1655
01:30:59.159 --> 01:31:03.399
<v Speaker 3>point of Orthodox Trinitarian theology, particularly Exodus three fourteen, when

1656
01:31:03.479 --> 01:31:06.399
<v Speaker 3>God says, I am from fourteen fifteen, I am that

1657
01:31:06.520 --> 01:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>I am as Saint Maximus, Saint Grey Palamas says he

1658
01:31:10.640 --> 01:31:12.079
<v Speaker 3>did not say I am essence.

1659
01:31:12.640 --> 01:31:15.119
<v Speaker 2>He said I am as an I am he.

1660
01:31:15.960 --> 01:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Thus, the Father is the beginning point of all Trinitarian theology,

1661
01:31:19.079 --> 01:31:23.279
<v Speaker 3>and contrary to Latin metaphysical essentialism, we don't begin our

1662
01:31:23.279 --> 01:31:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Trinitarian theology with the divine essence the Father's hypostatic property,

1663
01:31:27.560 --> 01:31:29.800
<v Speaker 3>since it's what picks him out as the one God,

1664
01:31:29.880 --> 01:31:32.399
<v Speaker 3>as the cause of the source the RK.

1665
01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:35.399
<v Speaker 2>This is the cappadoc in one on one teaching.

1666
01:31:35.479 --> 01:31:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Cannot be shared as the cappuditions noted, whatever is a

1667
01:31:39.439 --> 01:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>hypostatic property is unique to and individuates that person. Whatever

1668
01:31:44.079 --> 01:31:48.920
<v Speaker 3>is not is common to all three. Otherwise there would

1669
01:31:48.960 --> 01:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>be some form of subordinationism in the triad if there

1670
01:31:52.600 --> 01:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>were to be a power and attribute a property that

1671
01:31:55.960 --> 01:31:59.439
<v Speaker 3>two persons have that one lacks. You'll notice when Tim

1672
01:31:59.479 --> 01:32:03.359
<v Speaker 3>gave his explanations, he explicitly affirmed the very thing that

1673
01:32:03.439 --> 01:32:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Photius pointed out. He says, he's a red Photius. It

1674
01:32:07.399 --> 01:32:09.199
<v Speaker 3>doesn't sound like he's actually read it.

1675
01:32:09.239 --> 01:32:09.479
<v Speaker 2>To me.

1676
01:32:09.640 --> 01:32:12.359
<v Speaker 3>I think he's read some Roman Catholic websites that cite it.

1677
01:32:12.560 --> 01:32:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I've read it actually multiple times through us, so I

1678
01:32:14.680 --> 01:32:17.439
<v Speaker 3>know the Mystagaji very well. He actually talks about the

1679
01:32:17.439 --> 01:32:20.439
<v Speaker 3>manifestation of the spirit in the Mystagaji, which Tim says

1680
01:32:20.439 --> 01:32:22.640
<v Speaker 3>they don't talk about They missed this and had to

1681
01:32:22.680 --> 01:32:25.119
<v Speaker 3>make it up later. But wait a minute, Tim said,

1682
01:32:25.279 --> 01:32:29.960
<v Speaker 3>if one cannot spiate or if the he said that,

1683
01:32:30.199 --> 01:32:32.840
<v Speaker 3>if one of them does not spiate, they're less. Thus

1684
01:32:32.880 --> 01:32:35.159
<v Speaker 3>the son has to be able to spirate. Tim, maybe

1685
01:32:35.159 --> 01:32:37.439
<v Speaker 3>you didn't realize that in the In the Mysticgogy, that's

1686
01:32:37.439 --> 01:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>actually an argument that Photius makes that the spirit doesn't

1687
01:32:40.920 --> 01:32:42.199
<v Speaker 3>aspirate or generate.

1688
01:32:42.600 --> 01:32:46.279
<v Speaker 2>So, by your own argumentation, if the son is not

1689
01:32:46.439 --> 01:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>equal to the Father because he doesn't spirrate, then the

1690
01:32:50.600 --> 01:32:52.239
<v Speaker 2>spirit has to also spirrate.

1691
01:32:52.359 --> 01:32:55.079
<v Speaker 3>But nobody teaches this. The spirit spir rates or generates

1692
01:32:55.079 --> 01:32:58.720
<v Speaker 3>a person. So by your own argument, you subordinated the spirit,

1693
01:32:58.920 --> 01:33:01.039
<v Speaker 3>which is the very argument this made in the Mystic God,

1694
01:33:01.199 --> 01:33:03.520
<v Speaker 3>which tells me that you didn't actually read the Mystagogy.

1695
01:33:03.640 --> 01:33:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to quote you again. If one does not

1696
01:33:05.760 --> 01:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>inspire it, then they're less. That's what you said. I

1697
01:33:08.920 --> 01:33:11.119
<v Speaker 2>hope the son does inspire at east less? Sorry?

1698
01:33:11.239 --> 01:33:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Uhuh so the spirit does he do? No, he doesn't,

1699
01:33:14.600 --> 01:33:17.640
<v Speaker 3>does he? So by that same John's Gospel, he says,

1700
01:33:17.720 --> 01:33:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I have everything the Father has.

1701
01:33:19.359 --> 01:33:23.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, except the causality as the Cappadotions and constantin Noble

1702
01:33:23.039 --> 01:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>One teach. So quoting the scripture, you're quoting the Cappadocians.

1703
01:33:26.319 --> 01:33:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh scripture.

1704
01:33:26.840 --> 01:33:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait a minute, So the concetpt Noble one is

1705
01:33:29.760 --> 01:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the dog of the Roman Kelly Church or not, because

1706
01:33:31.960 --> 01:33:34.079
<v Speaker 3>it says you have to follow the Cappadocian teaching all.

1707
01:33:33.960 --> 01:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>The Father is the sole cause, sole cause.

1708
01:33:36.479 --> 01:33:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Now isn't it interesting that Roman Catholic scholars themselves have discussed,

1709
01:33:40.880 --> 01:33:44.239
<v Speaker 3>by the way, Basil talking about eternal manifestation in Edward

1710
01:33:44.319 --> 01:33:47.079
<v Speaker 3>Kishenski's famous book The Philioka, which is one of the

1711
01:33:47.079 --> 01:33:50.119
<v Speaker 3>more recent historical academic texts on that. Oh but wait

1712
01:33:50.159 --> 01:33:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a minute, did you know it turns out that Sishansky

1713
01:33:52.640 --> 01:33:55.920
<v Speaker 3>actually went from Unionism to Orthodoxy. Why is that, Well,

1714
01:33:55.920 --> 01:33:57.560
<v Speaker 3>he wrote this book about the philio Oka and he

1715
01:33:57.640 --> 01:34:02.239
<v Speaker 3>realized that. Turns out Basil teaches eternal manifestation on page

1716
01:34:02.239 --> 01:34:04.279
<v Speaker 3>thirty nine, which oh you thought that was made up

1717
01:34:04.319 --> 01:34:06.399
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle Ages, even though it's in Saint Basil.

1718
01:34:06.640 --> 01:34:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, but it's also in the Mystagogy in book two.

1719
01:34:09.199 --> 01:34:11.079
<v Speaker 2>So you're acclaiming all.

1720
01:34:10.960 --> 01:34:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Of these things about what the Orthodox position is and

1721
01:34:13.159 --> 01:34:15.239
<v Speaker 3>where it made all these mistakes. You don't have any

1722
01:34:15.279 --> 01:34:18.720
<v Speaker 3>knowledge or familiarity with constantinumble one. And it's mandate that

1723
01:34:18.760 --> 01:34:20.880
<v Speaker 3>you have to follow the capitotion. Teaching on the Father

1724
01:34:20.960 --> 01:34:23.439
<v Speaker 3>is the sole cause. And in fact you give to

1725
01:34:23.560 --> 01:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the son the very thing that picks out the Father,

1726
01:34:27.079 --> 01:34:31.600
<v Speaker 3>which thus creates a diad, as Photius.

1727
01:34:31.159 --> 01:34:33.079
<v Speaker 2>Argued in the mystagogy originally.

1728
01:34:33.840 --> 01:34:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Now to come back to this notion of the monarchia again,

1729
01:34:36.920 --> 01:34:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in John fifteen twenty six, Jesus illustrates our position when

1730
01:34:40.520 --> 01:34:43.319
<v Speaker 3>he says, when the helper comes, who I will send

1731
01:34:43.319 --> 01:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>to you from the Father. That's Economia, the spirit of truth,

1732
01:34:46.640 --> 01:34:50.560
<v Speaker 3>who proceeds from the Father. Procession is explicitly said by

1733
01:34:50.680 --> 01:34:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Jesus to be from the Father. Now Tim likes to say, ah,

1734
01:34:53.960 --> 01:34:55.439
<v Speaker 3>but I can go to Romans, and I can go

1735
01:34:55.479 --> 01:34:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to Galatians four, and I can find Economia. Passage is

1736
01:34:59.560 --> 01:35:02.199
<v Speaker 3>where Jesus sends the Holy Spirit or it's called the

1737
01:35:02.239 --> 01:35:04.279
<v Speaker 3>spirit of the Sun. And I can read that back

1738
01:35:04.359 --> 01:35:11.199
<v Speaker 3>into the eternal trinitarian relations. No, you cannot, And I'll

1739
01:35:11.199 --> 01:35:14.239
<v Speaker 3>give an example. In Isaiah forty eight, we're told that

1740
01:35:14.800 --> 01:35:18.479
<v Speaker 3>the Spirit sends the Son. Is that going to be

1741
01:35:19.079 --> 01:35:21.840
<v Speaker 3>read back into the eternal relations in Isaiah forty eight.

1742
01:35:22.039 --> 01:35:25.199
<v Speaker 2>No, and this is a classic passage that Orthodox.

1743
01:35:24.840 --> 01:35:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Church fathers have cited for centuries to show that you

1744
01:35:27.479 --> 01:35:31.880
<v Speaker 3>cannot arbitrarily say that the economic relations and passages can

1745
01:35:31.920 --> 01:35:35.239
<v Speaker 3>be read into the eternal triad. That's only it only

1746
01:35:35.279 --> 01:35:37.359
<v Speaker 3>takes one example to show why you can't do that.

1747
01:35:39.920 --> 01:35:45.479
<v Speaker 3>Thomas Aquinas said persons are relations or persona at relatio. No,

1748
01:35:45.600 --> 01:35:49.119
<v Speaker 3>a person is not a relation. A person is a subject.

1749
01:35:49.439 --> 01:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>And this is precisely why his essentialist trinitarian theology goes wrong.

1750
01:35:54.119 --> 01:35:56.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't begin our trinitarian theology with the divine essence,

1751
01:35:57.239 --> 01:35:59.640
<v Speaker 3>but rather with the person of the Father. And that's

1752
01:35:59.640 --> 01:36:02.800
<v Speaker 3>what the Orthodox Church fathers teach. That's why we continue

1753
01:36:02.840 --> 01:36:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to uphold the Father as the soul arcade.

1754
01:36:06.039 --> 01:36:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Now beyond that, how much, how to have you have?

1755
01:36:08.359 --> 01:36:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Three minutes?

1756
01:36:08.840 --> 01:36:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, beyond that, I want to talk about his quotation

1757
01:36:12.840 --> 01:36:14.199
<v Speaker 3>which surprised me.

1758
01:36:15.479 --> 01:36:18.359
<v Speaker 2>He cited to Gregor of Nissa, and I don't think.

1759
01:36:18.239 --> 01:36:20.119
<v Speaker 3>He even understood what he was citing, because again he's

1760
01:36:20.119 --> 01:36:23.680
<v Speaker 3>pulling from Quote Minds, where he said that every operation

1761
01:36:23.880 --> 01:36:25.479
<v Speaker 3>is from the Father through the Son and in the

1762
01:36:25.479 --> 01:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Holy spirit. He is apparently not aware that this is

1763
01:36:27.560 --> 01:36:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the Basilian dictum that every Orthodox person knows very clearly

1764
01:36:30.760 --> 01:36:34.399
<v Speaker 3>from the liturgy, which is about the movement of the energies.

1765
01:36:34.560 --> 01:36:37.000
<v Speaker 3>If you'd actually read Nissa in that section, you would

1766
01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:41.279
<v Speaker 3>know that he's talking about the energetic procession, which is

1767
01:36:41.319 --> 01:36:44.119
<v Speaker 3>the same thing as energetic manifestation.

1768
01:36:44.720 --> 01:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>But you didn't know that. You just saw a quote

1769
01:36:46.600 --> 01:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>mind that.

1770
01:36:46.920 --> 01:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You thought would help to prove philioak way, when it's

1771
01:36:50.039 --> 01:36:52.720
<v Speaker 3>actually the opposite of philiokuay. So I'm glad that you

1772
01:36:52.800 --> 01:36:58.119
<v Speaker 3>cited this, because energetic manifestation or energetic procession is very

1773
01:36:58.119 --> 01:36:59.359
<v Speaker 3>crucial to our doctrine.

1774
01:36:59.439 --> 01:37:00.880
<v Speaker 2>The reason that we don't.

1775
01:37:00.600 --> 01:37:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Believe in the Latin definition is precisely because they don't

1776
01:37:04.840 --> 01:37:09.720
<v Speaker 3>understand that the movement of the energies is necessarily connected

1777
01:37:09.760 --> 01:37:13.680
<v Speaker 3>to rejecting the person of the son as a spirator

1778
01:37:13.720 --> 01:37:14.319
<v Speaker 3>of the spirit.

1779
01:37:14.920 --> 01:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>So no, he's only.

1780
01:37:16.359 --> 01:37:18.279
<v Speaker 3>Shown that he didn't understand any of what he read,

1781
01:37:18.479 --> 01:37:21.319
<v Speaker 3>if he even read it. Furthermore, the letter to Marhinus

1782
01:37:21.359 --> 01:37:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that he quoted doesn't say the Latins are correct what

1783
01:37:23.840 --> 01:37:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Maximus says, and the letter to Marhus is that at

1784
01:37:26.399 --> 01:37:29.159
<v Speaker 3>this point it's unclear what they mean. We ought to

1785
01:37:29.279 --> 01:37:32.039
<v Speaker 3>just leave it up to an open question, and it's

1786
01:37:32.039 --> 01:37:35.079
<v Speaker 3>not solved until twelve to seventy four of the Council Lions.

1787
01:37:35.159 --> 01:37:38.119
<v Speaker 3>So this happens many centuries later, and we would agree

1788
01:37:38.159 --> 01:37:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that at that time it was not exactly clear because

1789
01:37:40.840 --> 01:37:43.319
<v Speaker 3>if you read Saint Hilary Portier, guess what he doesn't

1790
01:37:43.359 --> 01:37:46.199
<v Speaker 3>teach philioque, as Sushenski admits, he teaches that the father

1791
01:37:46.319 --> 01:37:49.119
<v Speaker 3>is the soul monarchia in the godhead. All that the

1792
01:37:49.159 --> 01:37:52.239
<v Speaker 3>father has belongs to the son is correct, except not

1793
01:37:52.880 --> 01:37:56.760
<v Speaker 3>paternity or causality. So it is not the case exclusively

1794
01:37:56.800 --> 01:37:58.800
<v Speaker 3>that all that the father has belongs to the son.

1795
01:37:59.199 --> 01:38:02.159
<v Speaker 3>And anybody who knows orthoxiology would know that there's no

1796
01:38:02.199 --> 01:38:07.039
<v Speaker 3>semantic dodge. As we said, Toodius doesn't teach anything different.

1797
01:38:07.039 --> 01:38:09.319
<v Speaker 3>In fact, in eternal manifestation, if you'd read some of

1798
01:38:09.359 --> 01:38:18.439
<v Speaker 3>this from people on our side, is found in the Cappadocians. Yeah,

1799
01:38:18.479 --> 01:38:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll go ahead and just stop.

1800
01:38:19.399 --> 01:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>With that, all right, You have an additional forty five seconds.

1801
01:38:22.720 --> 01:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You can add it to any one of your positions.

1802
01:38:25.920 --> 01:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>As we're talking about. Well, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, Okay,

1803
01:38:27.800 --> 01:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to have this second.

1804
01:38:28.640 --> 01:38:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead, you have forty five seconds left. Okay.

1805
01:38:31.159 --> 01:38:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So where do we get the idea that this both

1806
01:38:36.800 --> 01:38:40.560
<v Speaker 3>essence energy teaching which is directly connected to the person

1807
01:38:40.560 --> 01:38:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of the Father as the sole monarchia in the Godhead. Notice,

1808
01:38:43.920 --> 01:38:48.199
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians don't teach monotheism. They never talk about monotheism,

1809
01:38:48.760 --> 01:38:50.359
<v Speaker 3>if in anyone and by the way I sent all

1810
01:38:50.359 --> 01:38:52.279
<v Speaker 3>this information to him, I told him to listen to

1811
01:38:52.319 --> 01:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>doctor bro Bo Brandtson's lectures on the monarchy of the Father,

1812
01:38:55.680 --> 01:38:58.479
<v Speaker 3>because he would have been able to see that in

1813
01:38:58.640 --> 01:39:00.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Holy Spirit of Saint Basil, Letter thirty eight

1814
01:39:00.640 --> 01:39:04.720
<v Speaker 3>to Saint Basil and Nissa against Eunomius, by both Basil

1815
01:39:04.760 --> 01:39:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and against Unomius Nisa theological orations, particularly Ration twenty five,

1816
01:39:09.760 --> 01:39:11.960
<v Speaker 3>we have in those statements and as well as the

1817
01:39:11.960 --> 01:39:14.600
<v Speaker 3>decree of Constantinople one, that you must follow the Cappadocian

1818
01:39:14.720 --> 01:39:17.960
<v Speaker 3>view that the One God is the Father. There is

1819
01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:21.359
<v Speaker 3>no identification of the One God as the Essence as

1820
01:39:21.439 --> 01:39:25.199
<v Speaker 3>is taught in Augustinian theology. It just so happens that

1821
01:39:25.279 --> 01:39:28.239
<v Speaker 3>in Tim's mind, in the Roman Catholic mind, all the

1822
01:39:28.239 --> 01:39:32.960
<v Speaker 3>world accepted Augustinian theology is trinitarian, but they're totally ignorant

1823
01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:36.760
<v Speaker 3>of constantinople One's Cappadocian theology. And guess what, Augustine's not

1824
01:39:36.840 --> 01:39:39.680
<v Speaker 3>taught theology is not taught a constantineble one.

1825
01:39:39.880 --> 01:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, I would like to hear one's in the chat.

1826
01:39:42.399 --> 01:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>If you think for the opening statement one's the chat,

1827
01:39:44.680 --> 01:39:46.079
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like there was a stronger or I

1828
01:39:46.079 --> 01:39:49.439
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say feel Do you confidently know before your family

1829
01:39:49.479 --> 01:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and God that Jay Dire had a stronger argument? And

1830
01:39:51.920 --> 01:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>two do you confidently know between your family and God

1831
01:39:55.079 --> 01:39:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that Timothy Gordon had a stronger argument? As you're writing

1832
01:39:57.760 --> 01:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that down, let's go ahead and we will jump in

1833
01:40:01.359 --> 01:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to our rebuttals. Are you prepared and ready to uh

1834
01:40:04.880 --> 01:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to rebuttal? All right, Timothy, I'm gonna go ahead and

1835
01:40:07.279 --> 01:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>reset the clock. You're going to have five minutes. Give

1836
01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>me one moment here to adjust and set the clock.

1837
01:40:13.840 --> 01:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, If you're ready, your time starts now.

1838
01:40:16.319 --> 01:40:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Uh. Constantinople One wasn't outside of communion. Jay misspoke there.

1839
01:40:21.359 --> 01:40:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Malicius was in communion, so it was an in communion

1840
01:40:25.199 --> 01:40:27.840
<v Speaker 2>council unless I misheard Je you said it was outside

1841
01:40:27.840 --> 01:40:32.800
<v Speaker 2>of communion a source on that. The father. Also, the

1842
01:40:32.840 --> 01:40:36.920
<v Speaker 2>father is the only auto theos. Well, malicious was in communion.

1843
01:40:36.960 --> 01:40:41.399
<v Speaker 2>It's a communion council. Uh, people check, I don't want

1844
01:40:41.399 --> 01:40:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to waste my time. The father is the only auto theos.

1845
01:40:45.159 --> 01:40:47.399
<v Speaker 2>The ark is the father. Now this is this is

1846
01:40:47.479 --> 01:40:50.760
<v Speaker 2>my my soul time here, check it, google it. Uh.

1847
01:40:51.199 --> 01:40:54.960
<v Speaker 2>The father is the only auto theos is basic constantinople

1848
01:40:54.960 --> 01:40:58.680
<v Speaker 2>one was before before out of communion. Have you read Basil.

1849
01:40:58.680 --> 01:41:01.600
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about Malaysia. Jay, let's ask some questions during

1850
01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:04.920
<v Speaker 2>during during this first sex faults. So the father, the

1851
01:41:04.960 --> 01:41:07.920
<v Speaker 2>father is the only auto theos. This is absolutely affirmed

1852
01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:11.439
<v Speaker 2>by Catholic theology. One of Jay's tricks that everyone everyone

1853
01:41:11.520 --> 01:41:13.439
<v Speaker 2>has to look out for is he'll just say, well,

1854
01:41:13.439 --> 01:41:16.359
<v Speaker 2>this is Cappadocia. Have you read Cappadocian theology. That well,

1855
01:41:16.399 --> 01:41:21.119
<v Speaker 2>according to Catholic theology, the father is the only auto theos.

1856
01:41:21.520 --> 01:41:25.279
<v Speaker 2>According to Phillyoquay, father is the only auto theos. The

1857
01:41:25.520 --> 01:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>ark is the fathers according to Catholic theology. According to

1858
01:41:29.600 --> 01:41:33.039
<v Speaker 2>the Phillyoquay the ark is the father's Let me say that,

1859
01:41:33.520 --> 01:41:38.479
<v Speaker 2>and it's not subordination to say Philly Oquay because they're

1860
01:41:38.560 --> 01:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>all the essence, and because of the relations of opposition

1861
01:41:42.760 --> 01:41:47.119
<v Speaker 2>between the three persons of the Trinity, they're all the essence,

1862
01:41:47.600 --> 01:41:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and because of passive spiration of the Holy Spirit. Now,

1863
01:41:52.279 --> 01:41:55.039
<v Speaker 2>you can quibble with scripture if you want. When Jesus

1864
01:41:55.039 --> 01:41:59.079
<v Speaker 2>says in Gone John's Gospel that all the Father has

1865
01:41:59.199 --> 01:42:02.119
<v Speaker 2>I have as well, evidently Jay didn't read that all

1866
01:42:02.199 --> 01:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>the Father has I have as well, and he's saying

1867
01:42:05.399 --> 01:42:09.319
<v Speaker 2>that it's subordinationism for me to read that scripture and

1868
01:42:09.359 --> 01:42:13.079
<v Speaker 2>to say, Okay, two of the persons can have active

1869
01:42:13.119 --> 01:42:16.079
<v Speaker 2>spiration and one of the persons, the Holy Spirit, can

1870
01:42:16.119 --> 01:42:19.640
<v Speaker 2>have something called passive spiration. But that's the fact. The

1871
01:42:19.640 --> 01:42:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Father is the Autotheos, that's the ARKA. Retards in Chad

1872
01:42:23.720 --> 01:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>are probably saying something like, oh this is this is Orthodox. No,

1873
01:42:27.439 --> 01:42:30.119
<v Speaker 2>this is Catholic. This is Catholic as well. Of course

1874
01:42:30.159 --> 01:42:33.199
<v Speaker 2>the ark is the Father's. For the retards out there,

1875
01:42:33.279 --> 01:42:37.640
<v Speaker 2>only the divine, the Divine Essence only comes in an

1876
01:42:37.760 --> 01:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>ungenerated way to the Father. Now, the Son is the

1877
01:42:42.600 --> 01:42:45.760
<v Speaker 2>only begotten. He gets it from the Father. So we'll

1878
01:42:45.760 --> 01:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>say it again, the Holy Spirit gets it from the source,

1879
01:42:50.079 --> 01:42:54.399
<v Speaker 2>from the ark of the fathers through the Son. This

1880
01:42:54.520 --> 01:42:59.159
<v Speaker 2>is not subordinationism. There's spiration happening actively from the Father

1881
01:42:59.239 --> 01:43:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and the Son and the Spirit. Now I wouldn't be

1882
01:43:03.039 --> 01:43:05.359
<v Speaker 2>making this bold claim, and neither would the Roman Catholic

1883
01:43:05.479 --> 01:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Church via filioque, if not for passages where Jesus affirms

1884
01:43:11.319 --> 01:43:16.439
<v Speaker 2>explicitly over against Jadier and any what else he wants

1885
01:43:16.479 --> 01:43:22.279
<v Speaker 2>to sight that everything he has comes from the Father explicitly.

1886
01:43:24.800 --> 01:43:28.159
<v Speaker 2>And so this is Saint Hilary of Poitier concerning the

1887
01:43:28.159 --> 01:43:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit. He is of the Father and the Son

1888
01:43:31.800 --> 01:43:34.760
<v Speaker 2>his sources. I'll say that again. He is of the

1889
01:43:34.800 --> 01:43:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Father and the Son his sources. Or he is not

1890
01:43:38.159 --> 01:43:41.319
<v Speaker 2>without origin. He is from the Father and the Son.

1891
01:43:41.399 --> 01:43:43.399
<v Speaker 2>This is about as explicit as you can be. And

1892
01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:49.439
<v Speaker 2>Jay's saying just because I don't know, he's accuse me

1893
01:43:49.479 --> 01:43:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of quote mining. Let me read it again. The Holy

1894
01:43:52.640 --> 01:43:56.239
<v Speaker 2>Spirit is from the Father and the Son his sources.

1895
01:43:56.239 --> 01:43:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Not to say that the Father is not the only autotheos,

1896
01:43:59.840 --> 01:44:03.560
<v Speaker 2>but the sources still can be the Father with the son.

1897
01:44:03.840 --> 01:44:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Where he's not without origin. He is from the Father

1898
01:44:07.720 --> 01:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>and the Son. If ever there was a time the

1899
01:44:11.399 --> 01:44:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Father was not, then the son was not. If ever

1900
01:44:13.479 --> 01:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a time when the Son was not, then

1901
01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:17.239
<v Speaker 2>the Holy Spirit was not. I don't know how this

1902
01:44:17.319 --> 01:44:21.880
<v Speaker 2>is merely an economic relation. This is Gregory Nazianzas, and

1903
01:44:22.359 --> 01:44:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it seems really strange to be talking about nazianzas As

1904
01:44:26.840 --> 01:44:30.399
<v Speaker 2>if this is not some sort of eternal relation drawn

1905
01:44:30.439 --> 01:44:33.119
<v Speaker 2>between the Father and the Son. Tell me where I'm wrong,

1906
01:44:33.840 --> 01:44:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Tell me where I'm wrong, if this is eternal or not.

1907
01:44:40.359 --> 01:44:43.319
<v Speaker 2>When the Helper this is John fifteen, verse twenty six.

1908
01:44:43.359 --> 01:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I just want to get this out. When the Helper comes,

1909
01:44:45.720 --> 01:44:48.960
<v Speaker 2>whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit

1910
01:44:49.079 --> 01:44:51.680
<v Speaker 2>of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear

1911
01:44:51.880 --> 01:44:56.199
<v Speaker 2>witness about me. I don't know with regard to Orthodox

1912
01:44:56.239 --> 01:44:59.279
<v Speaker 2>theology what this means, but this is scripture, and it

1913
01:44:59.319 --> 01:45:07.119
<v Speaker 2>is utterly clear. It is the Father, the source, the

1914
01:45:07.199 --> 01:45:12.000
<v Speaker 2>direct spirator, through the Son, another direct spirator sending the

1915
01:45:12.000 --> 01:45:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit. This does not contradict the ark being solely gods,

1916
01:45:17.880 --> 01:45:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the moan arcade of gods. All right, time, all.

1917
01:45:21.399 --> 01:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, So as we have the rebuttal there, we're gonna

1918
01:45:23.680 --> 01:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and we're gonna move over to Uh, We're

1919
01:45:26.279 --> 01:45:27.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna move over to Jay.

1920
01:45:28.079 --> 01:45:29.399
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna have five minutes on the clock.

1921
01:45:29.479 --> 01:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's try to keep it tight for the sake of

1922
01:45:31.279 --> 01:45:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the length of the of the debate and.

1923
01:45:33.680 --> 01:45:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Make sure people are able to watch the whole thing.

1924
01:45:35.439 --> 01:45:37.960
<v Speaker 2>So you have five minutes. Are you ready? Just to

1925
01:45:37.960 --> 01:45:39.119
<v Speaker 2>make sure you have your notes in front of you.

1926
01:45:39.840 --> 01:45:43.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, great, all right, Jane, you can begin now. Yeah.

1927
01:45:43.960 --> 01:45:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think Tim understands half of what

1928
01:45:49.760 --> 01:45:53.359
<v Speaker 3>he's talking about, because if he wanted to pull out

1929
01:45:53.399 --> 01:45:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the Hillary quote. First of all, Shansky admits on that

1930
01:45:57.079 --> 01:46:00.000
<v Speaker 3>section on Hillary that this isn't really a good argue

1931
01:46:00.359 --> 01:46:03.319
<v Speaker 3>for anything to do with the philioquid. For one, Tim

1932
01:46:03.359 --> 01:46:05.159
<v Speaker 3>may not have heard or may not be aware what

1933
01:46:05.239 --> 01:46:09.279
<v Speaker 3>the lions in Florence definition actually is. But he tried

1934
01:46:09.319 --> 01:46:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to pull Hillary to say his sources. Are you aware

1935
01:46:13.920 --> 01:46:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that lions and Florence teach that the father together are

1936
01:46:16.800 --> 01:46:20.680
<v Speaker 3>a single source of spiration? In your view, there's no

1937
01:46:20.920 --> 01:46:23.760
<v Speaker 3>dual sources. It's not the father and the son. So

1938
01:46:24.399 --> 01:46:27.000
<v Speaker 3>either Hillary got it wrong or that's not a text

1939
01:46:27.039 --> 01:46:33.319
<v Speaker 3>that proves eternal hypostatic double procession. The tacks in scripture,

1940
01:46:33.359 --> 01:46:36.479
<v Speaker 3>as I pointed out, don't necessarily prove what he thinks

1941
01:46:36.520 --> 01:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>they prove. Again, because I pointed out in Isaiah forty eight,

1942
01:46:39.880 --> 01:46:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the text says that the Spirit sent the Son, and

1943
01:46:42.600 --> 01:46:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a messianic prophecy.

1944
01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Section.

1945
01:46:44.359 --> 01:46:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Nobody believes that the Holy Spirit is the center of

1946
01:46:46.880 --> 01:46:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the Son. If you read that economia back into the

1947
01:46:49.800 --> 01:46:53.319
<v Speaker 3>eternal relations. Again, he didn't address the argument I made

1948
01:46:53.399 --> 01:46:58.159
<v Speaker 3>about the power of generating inspirating. He said that the

1949
01:46:58.199 --> 01:47:02.520
<v Speaker 3>son must have this because because it shows also that

1950
01:47:02.600 --> 01:47:04.800
<v Speaker 3>he's equal to the Father, because he has everything that

1951
01:47:04.840 --> 01:47:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the Father has. Again, he's not realizing that when I'm

1952
01:47:07.760 --> 01:47:10.640
<v Speaker 3>citing the Cappadocians, I'm not just citing church fathers because

1953
01:47:10.960 --> 01:47:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm citing them as random opinions. I'm citing what the

1954
01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:17.880
<v Speaker 3>decree of constantinople One says, which is that you must

1955
01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:22.760
<v Speaker 3>follow the Cappadocian dictum and the Cappadocian interpretation of the

1956
01:47:22.840 --> 01:47:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Niceno constant of the Politan creed. When the creed from

1957
01:47:26.680 --> 01:47:29.920
<v Speaker 3>that council, which was an edited version of nicea One's creed,

1958
01:47:30.039 --> 01:47:33.239
<v Speaker 3>says I believe in one God, the Father. It is

1959
01:47:33.319 --> 01:47:37.680
<v Speaker 3>identifying it as the Cappadocians all teach the sole source

1960
01:47:37.800 --> 01:47:41.319
<v Speaker 3>or rka or monarchia of the Father. It is not

1961
01:47:41.760 --> 01:47:46.199
<v Speaker 3>the Latin essentialist definitions of Thomas Aquinas and later Roman

1962
01:47:46.239 --> 01:47:48.319
<v Speaker 3>Catholic councils, which, by the way, refutes what he said

1963
01:47:48.600 --> 01:47:50.039
<v Speaker 3>the first time around when he tried to make the

1964
01:47:50.119 --> 01:47:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Church Fathers into aristotomists.

1965
01:47:52.560 --> 01:47:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Again, they're not.

1966
01:47:53.600 --> 01:47:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Furthermore, he said in his opening statement that a sayety

1967
01:47:59.479 --> 01:48:02.920
<v Speaker 3>God is when he was cashing out his divine simplicity

1968
01:48:02.960 --> 01:48:06.439
<v Speaker 3>act as Purist doctrine, a sayety a sayty means self

1969
01:48:06.479 --> 01:48:08.479
<v Speaker 3>existence or of oneself.

1970
01:48:08.800 --> 01:48:10.199
<v Speaker 2>That's what autotheos is.

1971
01:48:10.560 --> 01:48:12.840
<v Speaker 3>So now he's attributing the very thing that he argued

1972
01:48:12.880 --> 01:48:15.359
<v Speaker 3>in his opening statement about the divine essence to the

1973
01:48:15.359 --> 01:48:19.640
<v Speaker 3>person of the Father, showing that he confuses essential properties

1974
01:48:19.800 --> 01:48:23.000
<v Speaker 3>with hyposthetic properties. But what do we expect from people

1975
01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:25.239
<v Speaker 3>who think that relations of opposition is a way to

1976
01:48:25.319 --> 01:48:28.560
<v Speaker 3>cash out something in the triad? Nobody in the Church

1977
01:48:28.640 --> 01:48:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and the Church Fathers teaches a relation of oppositions, Because,

1978
01:48:31.760 --> 01:48:35.199
<v Speaker 3>as east Congar says in his famous essay on sant

1979
01:48:35.199 --> 01:48:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Agustin and the Kappadocians, that's an Augustinian idea that's developed

1980
01:48:39.199 --> 01:48:41.520
<v Speaker 3>in Thomas Aquinas. It doesn't exist in the first thousand

1981
01:48:41.600 --> 01:48:44.119
<v Speaker 3>years of the Church. And again because he actually thinks

1982
01:48:44.119 --> 01:48:48.319
<v Speaker 3>that relations are persons, because that's the tonistic teaching, when no,

1983
01:48:48.760 --> 01:48:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a relation is something that a subject has, right, a

1984
01:48:52.840 --> 01:48:57.680
<v Speaker 3>subject has a relation, A relation is a predicate. Subjects persons.

1985
01:48:57.920 --> 01:49:00.840
<v Speaker 3>He the father, so he doesn't underst and these basic

1986
01:49:00.880 --> 01:49:04.039
<v Speaker 3>distinctions that the Eastern Church fathers make, which he would

1987
01:49:04.079 --> 01:49:05.760
<v Speaker 3>have done a lot better to actually have read these

1988
01:49:05.800 --> 01:49:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Eastern Church fathers or to actually read maybe some of

1989
01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the academic texts from his own theologians about the Philioquay,

1990
01:49:11.760 --> 01:49:14.359
<v Speaker 3>admitting that a lot of these quote minds don't actually

1991
01:49:14.399 --> 01:49:17.359
<v Speaker 3>work to prove anything and actually work against his case

1992
01:49:17.479 --> 01:49:21.439
<v Speaker 3>because again he wants to downplay his own church's dogmatic definition,

1993
01:49:21.479 --> 01:49:24.399
<v Speaker 3>and he's patently totally false. I've got scholars here right

1994
01:49:24.439 --> 01:49:26.960
<v Speaker 3>next to me for years have been talking about the

1995
01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:30.920
<v Speaker 3>fact that Constantinople one closed outside of communion with Rome.

1996
01:49:31.359 --> 01:49:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Saint Melidius of Antioch was in schism with Rome. He

1997
01:49:34.560 --> 01:49:37.119
<v Speaker 3>doesn't even know that, and so he just says google it,

1998
01:49:37.159 --> 01:49:41.199
<v Speaker 3>which again shows he's deficient, totally deficient in this area.

1999
01:49:41.359 --> 01:49:44.239
<v Speaker 3>It's the Malician schism is famous. Basil writes about it

2000
01:49:44.239 --> 01:49:46.359
<v Speaker 3>in his letters, and in fact Basil says Rome is

2001
01:49:46.359 --> 01:49:49.199
<v Speaker 3>absolutely worthless. They can contribute nothing to helping the church

2002
01:49:49.199 --> 01:49:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in the East. They're a waste of time. Doesn't sound

2003
01:49:51.920 --> 01:49:54.039
<v Speaker 3>like papal supremacy to me. But what do you expect

2004
01:49:54.079 --> 01:49:56.039
<v Speaker 3>from people who don't know what the Cappadocian's taught.

2005
01:49:56.039 --> 01:49:58.439
<v Speaker 2>They just think that they do, because well, I can

2006
01:49:58.479 --> 01:50:01.960
<v Speaker 2>read it all through Thomas Aquinas. Thomas Aquinas when.

2007
01:50:01.840 --> 01:50:05.520
<v Speaker 3>He argues against the Phillyoque in contra against the errors

2008
01:50:05.520 --> 01:50:06.079
<v Speaker 3>of the Greeks.

2009
01:50:06.399 --> 01:50:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I've got the recently printed book here. Guess what it's like,

2010
01:50:11.079 --> 01:50:13.000
<v Speaker 2>sixty seventy forgeries.

2011
01:50:13.079 --> 01:50:15.520
<v Speaker 3>So shout out to George, our good buddy, and he

2012
01:50:15.720 --> 01:50:19.079
<v Speaker 3>just published the two volume Errors of the Latins text.

2013
01:50:19.439 --> 01:50:22.039
<v Speaker 3>The second volume is all about forgeries, and one of

2014
01:50:22.079 --> 01:50:25.239
<v Speaker 3>those key forgeries is against the errors of the Greeks

2015
01:50:25.239 --> 01:50:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Thomas Aquinas. And it's entirely possible that Aquinas legitimately believe

2016
01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:33.239
<v Speaker 3>that all the sources he was reading were authentic. But

2017
01:50:33.399 --> 01:50:35.720
<v Speaker 3>now we know, and it's now admitted in the scholarship.

2018
01:50:35.720 --> 01:50:38.960
<v Speaker 3>The Vatican admits it as well. I've got the Alexandria document, which,

2019
01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:40.640
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I don't know if Tim ever had

2020
01:50:40.640 --> 01:50:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the time to read his own Vatican statement about the East,

2021
01:50:45.079 --> 01:50:48.199
<v Speaker 3>both in she eighty and here it admits most of

2022
01:50:48.199 --> 01:50:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the positions that I'm arguing for.

2023
01:50:50.279 --> 01:50:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, like I said, let's get some ones in

2024
01:50:53.399 --> 01:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two's in the chats. I want to read a couple

2025
01:50:54.800 --> 01:50:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of the super chats that we have here as we

2026
01:50:57.119 --> 01:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>get into the cross examination game, just a second to

2027
01:50:59.359 --> 01:51:01.159
<v Speaker 1>get their question in line of what they want to

2028
01:51:01.159 --> 01:51:04.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Reminding you that you know, Buddy pp All

2029
01:51:04.479 --> 01:51:06.479
<v Speaker 1>said Tim has been forsaken. Everyone got to donate to

2030
01:51:06.520 --> 01:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the stream, or y'all are Yacubians? Like I mentioned. After that,

2031
01:51:10.159 --> 01:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>tego Ocho said, let's go. I also have a couple

2032
01:51:13.960 --> 01:51:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of critics late night tweakers. A critic of Tim said

2033
01:51:17.159 --> 01:51:19.079
<v Speaker 1>two dollars said, I feel embarrassed for Tim.

2034
01:51:19.159 --> 01:51:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Now.

2035
01:51:19.359 --> 01:51:23.439
<v Speaker 1>However, however, let's talk. God said, fy all polytheists idols

2036
01:51:23.479 --> 01:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>are created. Tim might be a polytheist, but others are

2037
01:51:26.319 --> 01:51:30.439
<v Speaker 1>saying Jay Dyer ain't no Yukubian. You're not Yucubian.

2038
01:51:30.520 --> 01:51:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Servant Nectoria said, Jake, keep it up.

2039
01:51:33.439 --> 01:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>R CC is a joke. I'm sure that's a Roman

2040
01:51:35.319 --> 01:51:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Catholic church. Maximus said, what I say has nothing to

2041
01:51:39.760 --> 01:51:43.359
<v Speaker 1>do with Jay. Also, we have let's talk. God said

2042
01:51:43.439 --> 01:51:46.800
<v Speaker 1>question for Tim, heaven has created? How can you see

2043
01:51:46.800 --> 01:51:51.079
<v Speaker 1>the divine essence in heaven in the beatific vision aka Creationean.

2044
01:51:51.640 --> 01:51:53.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we're gonna answer those questions right now.

2045
01:51:54.359 --> 01:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Don Visiu said, this is all retarded, splitting hairs over

2046
01:51:57.319 --> 01:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>divine theosophy leads no one to Christ.

2047
01:52:02.239 --> 01:52:03.479
<v Speaker 2>We also have real Carlism.

2048
01:52:03.520 --> 01:52:05.199
<v Speaker 1>No matter what you think, who you think is winning,

2049
01:52:05.399 --> 01:52:08.199
<v Speaker 1>We're all better off knowing this conversation is drowning out

2050
01:52:08.279 --> 01:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>James White's gay lisp. Also, we have machine Santo for

2051
01:52:15.840 --> 01:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>two dollars, and they said, Jay looking twenty years older,

2052
01:52:18.239 --> 01:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's defined cooking.

2053
01:52:20.680 --> 01:52:26.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Hey is he gay? Ass? Hey it's you know what? Yeah?

2054
01:52:27.079 --> 01:52:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Do trust me, man, I've aged so much. I see myself.

2055
01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I've only been doing this for like about a decade now.

2056
01:52:32.319 --> 01:52:34.319
<v Speaker 1>When I first started, I looked like a teenager, like

2057
01:52:34.720 --> 01:52:36.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, look like a nice little kid.

2058
01:52:36.039 --> 01:52:39.560
<v Speaker 2>And now I'm like nearly look dead. Warth thunder Us

2059
01:52:39.600 --> 01:52:40.640
<v Speaker 2>sent thirty dollars.

2060
01:52:40.920 --> 01:52:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Said Tom was talking about potential equivocations in the start,

2061
01:52:43.479 --> 01:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>yet his arguments hinges on them. He sneaks in quote

2062
01:52:46.039 --> 01:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>denying actus purists passive potency as well sneaking in ortho

2063
01:52:50.359 --> 01:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>real distinction scholastic major real distinction.

2064
01:52:53.520 --> 01:52:54.520
<v Speaker 2>We also had a dork.

2065
01:52:54.600 --> 01:52:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Jansen said, please ask mobs to ban anyone in the

2066
01:52:56.600 --> 01:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>chat who says that we should act more civil in chat.

2067
01:53:00.119 --> 01:53:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Fine, you guys can, guys go to war. And then

2068
01:53:02.560 --> 01:53:03.880
<v Speaker 2>true for once seesaid.

2069
01:53:03.560 --> 01:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Tim said, we can't experience any uncreatedness of God as creatures,

2070
01:53:07.399 --> 01:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so how does the incarnation work? I'll read two more

2071
01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:14.279
<v Speaker 1>here before we'll move on to the cross examination. Cult

2072
01:53:14.359 --> 01:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of Modernism said and quote, we deny the son is

2073
01:53:17.680 --> 01:53:20.199
<v Speaker 1>either a cause or a father, but although we do

2074
01:53:20.279 --> 01:53:22.079
<v Speaker 1>not say that the spirit is from the Sun, we

2075
01:53:22.159 --> 01:53:25.439
<v Speaker 1>call him the spirit of the son. And he quotes there,

2076
01:53:25.640 --> 01:53:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's perhaps probably Latin, and I'm not

2077
01:53:28.199 --> 01:53:30.479
<v Speaker 1>going to try to read it. Machine Santo also, I

2078
01:53:30.520 --> 01:53:32.359
<v Speaker 1>wonder if he believes the son is begotten by the son,

2079
01:53:32.560 --> 01:53:34.720
<v Speaker 1>because the son does what he sees the father doing.

2080
01:53:34.920 --> 01:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And one more quote from the same Culto as the

2081
01:53:36.680 --> 01:53:38.720
<v Speaker 1>second party said, the holy spirit is a spirit of

2082
01:53:38.760 --> 01:53:41.039
<v Speaker 1>the Father as proceeding from the Father, and is the

2083
01:53:41.039 --> 01:53:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Son's spirit not as originating from him, but as proceeding

2084
01:53:44.239 --> 01:53:49.159
<v Speaker 1>through him from the Father the Father alone. It is cause.

2085
01:53:49.680 --> 01:53:51.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, you guys, keep sending your super chaps. We'll

2086
01:53:51.479 --> 01:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be reading some more after this. We're gonna jump into

2087
01:53:53.600 --> 01:53:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the cross examination. If you're just joining the stream here,

2088
01:53:56.239 --> 01:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's where they can ask questions and then interrupt. This

2089
01:53:59.720 --> 01:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is a very strict format that they've agreed to, and

2090
01:54:02.039 --> 01:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you are enjoying it. With that few

2091
01:54:03.920 --> 01:54:06.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand of you watching across the platforms, I appreciate you

2092
01:54:06.760 --> 01:54:08.399
<v Speaker 1>guys watching. Don't for you to like, share and subscribe

2093
01:54:08.399 --> 01:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to this video. Let's begin here with Timothy Gordon representing

2094
01:54:11.720 --> 01:54:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic position. I'm going to reset the clock to

2095
01:54:14.640 --> 01:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be one moment. I've got to get out of the

2096
01:54:15.840 --> 01:54:18.760
<v Speaker 1>super chats. Your time starts now.

2097
01:54:20.920 --> 01:54:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Jay, you think triadic relations of opposition don't exist. Triad

2098
01:54:27.359 --> 01:54:31.880
<v Speaker 2>is three, opposition is two, precisely, so there's no opposition

2099
01:54:31.920 --> 01:54:34.880
<v Speaker 2>a triad. So within a triad, there cannot be individual

2100
01:54:35.359 --> 01:54:38.800
<v Speaker 2>relations of opposition. It's relations of origin in our view, now,

2101
01:54:39.159 --> 01:54:41.439
<v Speaker 2>not in your view. As a matter of nature. Have

2102
01:54:41.479 --> 01:54:45.039
<v Speaker 2>you ever played paper scissors rock? Yeah? Do you understand

2103
01:54:45.079 --> 01:54:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that paper scissors rock is at heart triadic relations of opposition,

2104
01:54:50.279 --> 01:54:53.159
<v Speaker 2>which you just said don't exist. The triad does not

2105
01:54:53.279 --> 01:54:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like paper rock scissors. No an, no, no, you said

2106
01:54:59.039 --> 01:55:02.680
<v Speaker 2>that that can't exit because two is indivisible within three

2107
01:55:03.159 --> 01:55:08.399
<v Speaker 2>relations of opposition we have, so as the trinity scissor

2108
01:55:08.479 --> 01:55:12.520
<v Speaker 2>paper rock, paper, these can exist, Bill, reality can exist

2109
01:55:12.560 --> 01:55:15.319
<v Speaker 2>with fatherhood. You said this to Christian Wagner. Do you

2110
01:55:15.319 --> 01:55:18.119
<v Speaker 2>care to amend your statement. It's a major logical I.

2111
01:55:18.279 --> 01:55:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Think that relations of opposition described the thing as relations

2112
01:55:22.760 --> 01:55:23.359
<v Speaker 3>of origin.

2113
01:55:23.760 --> 01:55:25.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what I disagreed with. You said, there's a mathematical

2114
01:55:25.920 --> 01:55:29.239
<v Speaker 2>problem that two doesn't go into because the diad is

2115
01:55:29.319 --> 01:55:31.640
<v Speaker 2>not a triad. But you understand that there can be

2116
01:55:31.720 --> 01:55:33.520
<v Speaker 2>relations of opposition within a triad.

2117
01:55:34.159 --> 01:55:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Speaking naturally, there's not not in the divine triad.

2118
01:55:37.359 --> 01:55:45.520
<v Speaker 2>No, no, we'll explain why. I just demonstrated the relation. Okay,

2119
01:55:45.520 --> 01:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>so you're going to play the game. Demonstrated paper scissors

2120
01:55:48.720 --> 01:55:51.920
<v Speaker 2>rocks doesn't exist. That's not the triad. That is a triad.

2121
01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:55.039
<v Speaker 2>That's three there. Do you how many positions are there

2122
01:55:55.079 --> 01:56:00.119
<v Speaker 2>with just three? And how many how many oppositions and

2123
01:56:00.319 --> 01:56:05.760
<v Speaker 2>relations triad is so you have a different triadology, and

2124
01:56:05.800 --> 01:56:09.439
<v Speaker 2>that's why this doesn't explain why it's different in the trinity,

2125
01:56:09.560 --> 01:56:12.920
<v Speaker 2>because we works perfect because we You say that, but

2126
01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you don't know our position relationship.

2127
01:56:14.960 --> 01:56:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking within the position of the trinity. Shut up

2128
01:56:18.680 --> 01:56:21.880
<v Speaker 3>and let me answer that question. Your position relations of

2129
01:56:22.239 --> 01:56:25.920
<v Speaker 3>origin is our position, not relation of opposition.

2130
01:56:26.159 --> 01:56:29.560
<v Speaker 2>This is just equivocation. Wait, no, I've heard enough. That's

2131
01:56:29.600 --> 01:56:32.800
<v Speaker 2>equivocation on a turn. Equivocation. You said the orthodox position

2132
01:56:32.840 --> 01:56:35.119
<v Speaker 2>is a quick quote. You're not even familiar with opposition,

2133
01:56:36.159 --> 01:56:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Christian are I'm talking to one dude. Triadic relations of

2134
01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:43.600
<v Speaker 2>opposition cannot exist because two doesn't go into three. That's

2135
01:56:43.640 --> 01:56:46.479
<v Speaker 2>what I said. I said, I diead is what opposition is.

2136
01:56:46.560 --> 01:56:48.199
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say two doesn't go in I th that's

2137
01:56:49.439 --> 01:56:53.159
<v Speaker 2>you're mistaking contrariety and opposition. You don't know you can

2138
01:56:53.279 --> 01:56:56.479
<v Speaker 2>have an opposition with a relations position. How do you

2139
01:56:56.479 --> 01:56:57.399
<v Speaker 2>don't know how? Patrician?

2140
01:56:57.439 --> 01:57:00.239
<v Speaker 3>So you haven't played number theory is not your you're

2141
01:57:00.279 --> 01:57:04.520
<v Speaker 3>ever an now specialty the way that paper argues for

2142
01:57:04.600 --> 01:57:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a did.

2143
01:57:05.439 --> 01:57:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say he's asking he's asking you to

2144
01:57:07.399 --> 01:57:09.399
<v Speaker 2>cut your response. He wants to continue on this questioning

2145
01:57:10.319 --> 01:57:14.199
<v Speaker 2>within a triod. Within a triad, you can have oppositions

2146
01:57:14.520 --> 01:57:17.479
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't contradict the triad. I showed the trinity

2147
01:57:17.720 --> 01:57:19.520
<v Speaker 2>show that I created. You didn't show that. You just

2148
01:57:19.560 --> 01:57:22.279
<v Speaker 2>said it it's an analogy. Well, how do you know,

2149
01:57:22.399 --> 01:57:23.720
<v Speaker 2>How do you know what matches up to the triad?

2150
01:57:24.119 --> 01:57:27.079
<v Speaker 2>You don't. No, I didn't say it matches up to

2151
01:57:27.119 --> 01:57:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the triad. You're you're not cross examining.

2152
01:57:28.920 --> 01:57:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Your analogy doesn't work. I thought, that's the thing is

2153
01:57:31.800 --> 01:57:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it works perfectly.

2154
01:57:33.159 --> 01:57:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Reality, filiality in fatherhood, those are opposed within a trinity.

2155
01:57:39.600 --> 01:57:42.560
<v Speaker 3>You're saying they're not opposed. That's not what relations of opposition.

2156
01:57:42.720 --> 01:57:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Forget my analogy oppress This is the most important distinction

2157
01:57:47.399 --> 01:57:50.039
<v Speaker 2>within the entire philio O. Wait, hold on, So you're

2158
01:57:50.079 --> 01:57:54.319
<v Speaker 2>saying that affiliation and fatherhood are not opposed in the

2159
01:57:54.359 --> 01:57:56.720
<v Speaker 2>traditional ways of a couple.

2160
01:57:56.720 --> 01:57:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Will you let me answer this please? Are they opposed?

2161
01:57:59.359 --> 01:58:00.720
<v Speaker 3>There are real relations?

2162
01:58:01.479 --> 01:58:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Are they opposed? Let me finish.

2163
01:58:03.720 --> 01:58:07.159
<v Speaker 3>We do not believe in cashing out who the persons

2164
01:58:07.239 --> 01:58:11.680
<v Speaker 3>are by relations of opposition, because it's relative.

2165
01:58:11.800 --> 01:58:15.720
<v Speaker 2>So filiation and fatherhood are not opposed. It's relative because

2166
01:58:16.159 --> 01:58:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you because there's the third part. They're not a posed.

2167
01:58:19.119 --> 01:58:21.840
<v Speaker 3>You can talk about relations in the triad, but they

2168
01:58:21.880 --> 01:58:25.239
<v Speaker 3>don't ground the persons. That's Lostky's critique of this. You

2169
01:58:25.279 --> 01:58:26.560
<v Speaker 3>could have just read the things.

2170
01:58:26.359 --> 01:58:28.119
<v Speaker 2>I sent you, and then you want to be asking no, no,

2171
01:58:28.119 --> 01:58:30.159
<v Speaker 2>no no, because you didn't read anything I asked you.

2172
01:58:30.359 --> 01:58:35.159
<v Speaker 3>I asked you very specifically. Can there be oppositional terms

2173
01:58:35.239 --> 01:58:38.359
<v Speaker 3>that I'm telling you from ourselves? You don't understand? Is

2174
01:58:38.399 --> 01:58:42.439
<v Speaker 3>the way that dichotomies work. We can have we can dichotomies.

2175
01:58:43.159 --> 01:58:45.720
<v Speaker 2>All I was showing mathematically is that we can conceive

2176
01:58:46.079 --> 01:58:50.359
<v Speaker 2>of a triad that has three parts and three relations

2177
01:58:50.359 --> 01:58:54.479
<v Speaker 2>that are all diadic. But there's there's no part. It's

2178
01:58:54.520 --> 01:58:58.319
<v Speaker 2>just parts, and it doesn't work there. No, of course,

2179
01:58:58.359 --> 01:59:00.439
<v Speaker 2>not right. So that's what doesn't work. But there are

2180
01:59:00.479 --> 01:59:03.520
<v Speaker 2>relations of opposition, No, there's not. Yeah, there's relations of origin.

2181
01:59:03.640 --> 01:59:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, why don't you just understand our position before trying

2182
01:59:05.880 --> 01:59:07.199
<v Speaker 3>to trap me on your position?

2183
01:59:07.319 --> 01:59:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't hold to your position? Can you? Is there

2184
01:59:09.840 --> 01:59:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a single Eastern thinker between Photius and Blacker? Okay, so

2185
01:59:13.520 --> 01:59:16.119
<v Speaker 2>we got that. So there there can be relations of

2186
01:59:16.159 --> 01:59:20.000
<v Speaker 2>opposition between some trinities. Uh, I never granted any of this.

2187
01:59:20.199 --> 01:59:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Is there a single Eastern thinker between Photius and Blackeranne

2188
01:59:23.239 --> 01:59:27.279
<v Speaker 2>who embraces the eternal procession? Or they all just believers

2189
01:59:27.319 --> 01:59:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in economic procession for those four hundred years. Can you

2190
01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:36.560
<v Speaker 2>name a single thinker between eight hundred and twelve fifty

2191
01:59:36.880 --> 01:59:40.560
<v Speaker 2>who says that there is an eternal procession from the

2192
01:59:40.600 --> 01:59:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Sun to the Holy Spirit?

2193
01:59:42.800 --> 01:59:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Energetic procession is taught in the telmost against John Becos,

2194
01:59:45.600 --> 01:59:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it's in our council. Okay, Wait, so you think you

2195
01:59:48.960 --> 01:59:51.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know what our councils teach. I'm asking you, right,

2196
01:59:52.279 --> 01:59:54.960
<v Speaker 3>but is there a single person and you're not you're

2197
01:59:54.960 --> 01:59:57.319
<v Speaker 3>not aware of the temost against John Becko's You guys

2198
01:59:57.359 --> 02:00:00.760
<v Speaker 3>have thirty seconds, son, but so so, can you explain

2199
02:00:00.800 --> 02:00:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to me what that is? It's a document from the

2200
02:00:03.000 --> 02:00:06.399
<v Speaker 3>Palamite sonods in use against John Becko's Palamite sentence.

2201
02:00:06.439 --> 02:00:09.319
<v Speaker 2>What year they're in? The thirteen hundreds? Okay? No, I said,

2202
02:00:09.399 --> 02:00:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I wore between eight hundred and twelve fifty. I picked

2203
02:00:12.239 --> 02:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the dates for specific reason. What if, because it's very

2204
02:00:16.880 --> 02:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>important to my case. The Catholic cases that between serial

2205
02:00:21.279 --> 02:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>between Photius and serial areas, they completely botched the understanding

2206
02:00:25.680 --> 02:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of what Philly o'quay is, and then for the next

2207
02:00:27.840 --> 02:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and fifty years they reduced all the relations

2208
02:00:30.760 --> 02:00:34.119
<v Speaker 2>between the Sun and the Holy Spirit to economic ones.

2209
02:00:34.359 --> 02:00:37.119
<v Speaker 2>And then when they came back around the time of

2210
02:00:37.159 --> 02:00:41.359
<v Speaker 2>the council, you're citing that they came back in parsed language.

2211
02:00:41.399 --> 02:00:43.359
<v Speaker 2>It's eternal, but it's not hypostatic.

2212
02:00:43.399 --> 02:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna have to cut that there, and

2213
02:00:45.000 --> 02:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to continue to respond to that, we're

2214
02:00:46.560 --> 02:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to move over to Jay Dyer. Let me

2215
02:00:48.800 --> 02:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and reset this, and you have five minutes

2216
02:00:51.600 --> 02:00:53.359
<v Speaker 1>on the clock. I gave him a minute bleed because

2217
02:00:53.399 --> 02:00:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting. I'll give you an extra minute bleed

2218
02:00:55.439 --> 02:00:57.039
<v Speaker 1>if you need to as well. The time starts now.

2219
02:00:57.159 --> 02:00:59.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a stupid argument because I showed you from Sishensky

2220
02:01:00.079 --> 02:01:03.439
<v Speaker 3>that he says Basil talks about eternal manifestation. The very

2221
02:01:03.520 --> 02:01:06.560
<v Speaker 3>quote that you gave from Nissa about the movement of

2222
02:01:06.600 --> 02:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>the energies. You didn't even know that it's energetic procession.

2223
02:01:09.920 --> 02:01:12.479
<v Speaker 3>So you read things and you quote things, no idea

2224
02:01:12.520 --> 02:01:15.720
<v Speaker 3>what the context is, or that it's actually disproving.

2225
02:01:15.199 --> 02:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>You not true. You're begging the question, begging the question

2226
02:01:18.159 --> 02:01:22.159
<v Speaker 2>energetic procession, what does that even mean? You cided Nissa,

2227
02:01:22.439 --> 02:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>every operation moves from the Father through the son in

2228
02:01:25.560 --> 02:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the spirit precisely, what do you think operation is there?

2229
02:01:29.680 --> 02:01:31.119
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean? What is that? What's the word?

2230
02:01:31.800 --> 02:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>What is what's the word of the means hypostatic? What's

2231
02:01:35.680 --> 02:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the word for operating? Begging the question because you're begging

2232
02:01:38.880 --> 02:01:44.039
<v Speaker 2>the question because what's energetic procession? What's the word is? Right?

2233
02:01:44.199 --> 02:01:48.079
<v Speaker 2>You use to avoid saying that it moves? To you, goober,

2234
02:01:48.359 --> 02:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>what's the word when you're talking about the word in

2235
02:01:51.720 --> 02:01:55.439
<v Speaker 2>the Greek for operation? There, I don't, I don't know erga. Yeah,

2236
02:01:55.720 --> 02:01:58.239
<v Speaker 2>I just said so the movement energy in your quote,

2237
02:01:58.279 --> 02:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>but except energeia has three definitions that are that are

2238
02:02:02.760 --> 02:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>susceptible of meaning there you would you know? This is

2239
02:02:05.680 --> 02:02:10.079
<v Speaker 2>what I warned people that your own Yeah you don't, No,

2240
02:02:10.199 --> 02:02:14.279
<v Speaker 2>you don't, which can mean either operation, It can mean action,

2241
02:02:14.439 --> 02:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>it can mean work, it can mean product.

2242
02:02:16.399 --> 02:02:18.159
<v Speaker 3>You just admitted you didn't know what the word was.

2243
02:02:18.279 --> 02:02:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Now what I said is that the did you requires?

2244
02:02:22.119 --> 02:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>So if it's energy, if it's a word, show that

2245
02:02:27.600 --> 02:02:30.319
<v Speaker 3>it's not hypostatic. That has nothing to do with the

2246
02:02:30.319 --> 02:02:33.159
<v Speaker 3>fact that you misunderstood the quote. No, I didn't misunderstand

2247
02:02:33.199 --> 02:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>it at all.

2248
02:02:33.680 --> 02:02:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't miss about energetic procession. You didn't know that

2249
02:02:37.920 --> 02:02:40.079
<v Speaker 2>because you didn't know what it was. Yes, I did.

2250
02:02:40.079 --> 02:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I said it. You're just lied because you said you

2251
02:02:43.840 --> 02:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what it was energy. But the point is

2252
02:02:47.079 --> 02:02:49.319
<v Speaker 2>you didn't know. You're begging the question, you know as

2253
02:02:49.720 --> 02:02:54.079
<v Speaker 2>you knows, versus you have to lie the question, isn't.

2254
02:02:54.119 --> 02:02:56.279
<v Speaker 2>You're changing the subject because you just got caught lying.

2255
02:02:56.359 --> 02:02:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I didn't get caught lying. I said before you did.

2256
02:03:00.079 --> 02:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Why why does it matter? Here's how Jay proved because

2257
02:03:04.199 --> 02:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that energetic.

2258
02:03:06.319 --> 02:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Because look, we're going we're going in circles right now,

2259
02:03:10.560 --> 02:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna have to agree to disagreeable. On the

2260
02:03:13.000 --> 02:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>next section, you said, if one, uh, you have three minutes,

2261
02:03:15.960 --> 02:03:19.159
<v Speaker 1>if one spire, if one cannot spirate, there less does

2262
02:03:19.159 --> 02:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the spirit produce?

2263
02:03:19.920 --> 02:03:22.800
<v Speaker 2>A Person's ridiculous. I don't care if you think it's ridiculous.

2264
02:03:22.840 --> 02:03:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Answer it. Repeat the question. You said, if one cannot spirrate,

2265
02:03:27.920 --> 02:03:31.199
<v Speaker 2>they're less talking about the sun, right, m H, Well,

2266
02:03:31.239 --> 02:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about all three persons. Oh so the

2267
02:03:33.640 --> 02:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>spirit spirates, yeah, passively, the past spirit spir rates. The

2268
02:03:37.640 --> 02:03:42.439
<v Speaker 2>spirit spirates passively. He produced, Well, who does he produce?

2269
02:03:43.079 --> 02:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Does he produce? He rates passively? You've never heard the distinction, No,

2270
02:03:48.119 --> 02:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>who does the Spirit produce. The Spirit produces passively himself.

2271
02:03:54.359 --> 02:03:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Hit the spirit act the spirit. If you never heard

2272
02:03:59.399 --> 02:04:02.319
<v Speaker 2>the distinction between active and passive spiration is the have

2273
02:04:02.439 --> 02:04:05.039
<v Speaker 2>you is the essence of the source, according to see

2274
02:04:05.319 --> 02:04:07.079
<v Speaker 2>all you do. You could come in here and you say,

2275
02:04:07.600 --> 02:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>according to my theology, it's this. According to campus theology,

2276
02:04:12.760 --> 02:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>our theologian is passive the spirit. You got to answer

2277
02:04:16.800 --> 02:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the question. We're not going to run the clock. The

2278
02:04:19.800 --> 02:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit proceed inspirates passively, which means it's done to him. Yes,

2279
02:04:24.720 --> 02:04:30.199
<v Speaker 2>he receives it active versus passive. So yes, he himself aspirted.

2280
02:04:30.279 --> 02:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>We call that active aspiration.

2281
02:04:31.760 --> 02:04:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Did you even know that? You know it's the Son?

2282
02:04:34.159 --> 02:04:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you familiar? Are you familiar who the Holy Spirit?

2283
02:04:36.640 --> 02:04:38.199
<v Speaker 3>You're saying the Holy Spirit produces himself?

2284
02:04:39.000 --> 02:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I said, that receives spiration from and this is

2285
02:04:43.880 --> 02:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a passive spiration. Who does hespirate? He doesn't actively spired?

2286
02:04:47.840 --> 02:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Who does thespirate? You said he has to he has

2287
02:04:49.920 --> 02:04:52.239
<v Speaker 2>to spirate to have the same part. You're just playing

2288
02:04:52.279 --> 02:04:57.119
<v Speaker 2>games again because you don't know the Father son actively spirate.

2289
02:04:57.239 --> 02:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>You think it's the Father only in Roman Catholic the

2290
02:05:00.279 --> 02:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>tell me what I think the Holy Spirit.

2291
02:05:01.840 --> 02:05:05.159
<v Speaker 3>He's answering the question claimed that the Holy I'm just

2292
02:05:05.199 --> 02:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>telling you how a theology has You're just talking and

2293
02:05:07.319 --> 02:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>you're insisting because I've got you on this. You have

2294
02:05:10.119 --> 02:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>not you said that if you don't produce a person,

2295
02:05:12.560 --> 02:05:13.439
<v Speaker 3>you're supporting it.

2296
02:05:13.560 --> 02:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Who does the Holy Spirit produce? No? I said, spir eight,

2297
02:05:17.000 --> 02:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you have to spy if you don't back up the rest.

2298
02:05:19.760 --> 02:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Does son have the same power as the father? Yes?

2299
02:05:23.079 --> 02:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Does the spirit have that power? The Spirit has a

2300
02:05:26.199 --> 02:05:29.439
<v Speaker 2>different power, which is to what wishable to produce who? No,

2301
02:05:29.560 --> 02:05:32.359
<v Speaker 2>it's a passive spirit who, which is not the same

2302
02:05:32.399 --> 02:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>thing it's actively produced. So he does I thought the

2303
02:05:34.960 --> 02:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>language cause? So the spirit is not a cause. You've

2304
02:05:37.039 --> 02:05:40.279
<v Speaker 2>never heard this distinction in Roman Catholic theology. Spirit a cause?

2305
02:05:41.119 --> 02:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever heard this distinction in Roman? Not answer you?

2306
02:05:43.640 --> 02:05:45.960
<v Speaker 3>He won't answer the questions because he doesn't. Is the

2307
02:05:45.960 --> 02:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>spirit of causes?

2308
02:05:46.920 --> 02:05:50.079
<v Speaker 2>A cause? Is the spirit of thirty seconds on the

2309
02:05:50.119 --> 02:05:51.319
<v Speaker 2>clock to get an answer? Or do you want to

2310
02:05:51.359 --> 02:05:55.039
<v Speaker 2>end the question? Is the Holy Spirit? There's also a cause?

2311
02:05:55.199 --> 02:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>He is the cause in so far as he's passively spied?

2312
02:05:57.760 --> 02:05:58.319
<v Speaker 2>Who or what?

2313
02:05:59.600 --> 02:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Of?

2314
02:05:59.720 --> 02:06:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Who? Are what? Exactly? He just lost. No, wh you

2315
02:06:04.079 --> 02:06:06.119
<v Speaker 2>asked me, do you know what theology? Had you ever

2316
02:06:06.159 --> 02:06:08.239
<v Speaker 2>heard the distinction? You're here to tell me what your

2317
02:06:08.239 --> 02:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>theology is? No? No, not okay. Every time I ask

2318
02:06:11.760 --> 02:06:13.279
<v Speaker 2>you said do you know what theology? Do you know

2319
02:06:13.319 --> 02:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a theology? Answer? No, you don't know. Answer you claim

2320
02:06:16.039 --> 02:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>your spirit. You're just making it at home? No, at homes?

2321
02:06:20.840 --> 02:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>And who does? By the way, the reason he won't answer, no,

2322
02:06:24.079 --> 02:06:28.239
<v Speaker 2>you open who does produce? You opened up? He's saying,

2323
02:06:28.359 --> 02:06:37.439
<v Speaker 2>why won't you answer? No? You just said who? Yeah exactly,

2324
02:06:37.560 --> 02:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I said you our term is passive spression. No, you won't.

2325
02:06:40.600 --> 02:06:43.079
<v Speaker 2>You won't accept these people have different that. He produced

2326
02:06:43.159 --> 02:06:48.279
<v Speaker 2>terminological bases for making the claim. We don't accept subordinationism.

2327
02:06:48.399 --> 02:06:50.359
<v Speaker 2>I know you don't accept it, but I'm telling you

2328
02:06:50.399 --> 02:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>how you have it orthodolosity. Say it's subordination, if it's

2329
02:06:55.119 --> 02:06:57.479
<v Speaker 2>if it's the sun and the spirit together. All you're

2330
02:06:57.520 --> 02:07:00.479
<v Speaker 2>doing is insisting on your upside. You have answer, You

2331
02:07:00.520 --> 02:07:01.600
<v Speaker 2>just have silence.

2332
02:07:01.680 --> 02:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I said, answer is an answer your father and son.

2333
02:07:05.479 --> 02:07:09.319
<v Speaker 3>No I'm not, you said the son. Who does the

2334
02:07:09.359 --> 02:07:10.239
<v Speaker 3>spirit produces?

2335
02:07:10.680 --> 02:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Who? He passively spirates? Who? Who? What it's? Who does he?

2336
02:07:15.880 --> 02:07:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you understand the difference between an active forms and

2337
02:07:18.319 --> 02:07:20.199
<v Speaker 2>a passive verb. He is the cause of Do you

2338
02:07:20.279 --> 02:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>understand the difference between an active verb and a passive

2339
02:07:22.840 --> 02:07:23.199
<v Speaker 2>before me?

2340
02:07:23.199 --> 02:07:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Who's he called active verb? Has is transit is the

2341
02:07:26.399 --> 02:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>spirit of the cause. Do you not understand called him

2342
02:07:28.520 --> 02:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>a cause? He's not transitive?

2343
02:07:30.039 --> 02:07:32.399
<v Speaker 2>You called him a cause? Do you understand transitivity? You're

2344
02:07:32.399 --> 02:07:34.199
<v Speaker 2>not going to answer it. He won't answer. He's a

2345
02:07:34.239 --> 02:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>passive cause. I answer according to Roman Catholic, he is

2346
02:07:38.600 --> 02:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>a pastor who were on time. Let's do this.

2347
02:07:41.760 --> 02:07:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Here's I'm gonna I want to leave it with two questions.

2348
02:07:44.119 --> 02:07:45.079
<v Speaker 1>He's asking you a question.

2349
02:07:45.159 --> 02:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Nothing that you ask asked the question clearly, and I

2350
02:07:48.920 --> 02:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>want to hear just a simple answer. We'll leave it

2351
02:07:50.680 --> 02:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>at that. What is the question? Repeat it? What is

2352
02:07:53.000 --> 02:07:57.199
<v Speaker 2>the one question the cause of who? Go ahead? What

2353
02:07:57.279 --> 02:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>is the cause of him? Exactly? Can you act?

2354
02:08:02.039 --> 02:08:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Asking questions to questions which, to be fair, said of

2355
02:08:07.119 --> 02:08:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the moderator, You know that's saying that's It's the point

2356
02:08:10.359 --> 02:08:12.159
<v Speaker 1>to where I feel like we've gone in a complete circle.

2357
02:08:12.319 --> 02:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take completely unbiased here and say we

2358
02:08:15.680 --> 02:08:18.359
<v Speaker 1>can't come to a conclusion when we're asking questions to questions.

2359
02:08:18.359 --> 02:08:21.039
<v Speaker 2>So we will just leave it there. We will move here.

2360
02:08:21.239 --> 02:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, can I make a response? Yeah, you can.

2361
02:08:22.880 --> 02:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>You can make a response or ask one question, but

2362
02:08:24.560 --> 02:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it's got to be as simple to the point, not

2363
02:08:26.680 --> 02:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a paragraph. Just what's the statement. So in Roman Catholic

2364
02:08:30.039 --> 02:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>theology we say active spiration by the father and the son,

2365
02:08:34.199 --> 02:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>passive spiration by the spirit. Passive means that one is

2366
02:08:38.560 --> 02:08:41.840
<v Speaker 2>not acting but is acted upon. It is a passive potency.

2367
02:08:42.000 --> 02:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I asked you if he's a cause, and you said

2368
02:08:43.520 --> 02:08:47.359
<v Speaker 2>he was. Yes, there's one soul. Cause are you talking

2369
02:08:47.359 --> 02:08:49.479
<v Speaker 2>to K I thought you were talking one soul causes

2370
02:08:49.520 --> 02:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the I just add you said I don't know. I

2371
02:08:53.600 --> 02:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't know.

2372
02:08:54.399 --> 02:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I sincerely didn't know what you I the term that

2373
02:08:56.800 --> 02:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>the spirits are cause the.

2374
02:08:57.840 --> 02:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Spirit is a passive spirator of who? And I said,

2375
02:09:02.199 --> 02:09:05.039
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't make sense in the context of active and passive.

2376
02:09:05.159 --> 02:09:08.199
<v Speaker 2>So he doesn't. He's not a cause. You're making it

2377
02:09:08.239 --> 02:09:10.680
<v Speaker 2>like there's a flaw. There's not. This is just how

2378
02:09:10.760 --> 02:09:13.039
<v Speaker 2>we call you're not. This is how we explain. So

2379
02:09:13.119 --> 02:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>he won't the monarchy, you don't explain it. And John

2380
02:09:15.920 --> 02:09:19.359
<v Speaker 2>chapter sixteen, you're dodging the basic question. I'm not dodging

2381
02:09:19.479 --> 02:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty things. I'm not dodging Jay. All I'm seeking to

2382
02:09:22.840 --> 02:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>do is exitgy John sixteen. The fact that that Jesus said,

2383
02:09:28.079 --> 02:09:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Jesus says everything the Father has, I have as well.

2384
02:09:31.680 --> 02:09:34.239
<v Speaker 2>And you said, well, the cause that subordination. That the

2385
02:09:34.279 --> 02:09:37.479
<v Speaker 2>cause you're trying to drive the position into subordinationism. And

2386
02:09:37.520 --> 02:09:40.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, no, there's such a thing as passive spies.

2387
02:09:40.279 --> 02:09:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I sure stand you're saying that. But what you're showing

2388
02:09:42.840 --> 02:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a cause you didn't show anything. You just say, are you?

2389
02:09:45.640 --> 02:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Are you? Are you? Are you satisfied with the answer?

2390
02:09:48.920 --> 02:09:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like he answered no, he's not about dodging.

2391
02:09:52.000 --> 02:09:54.359
<v Speaker 2>But okay, And do you believe that you're answering or

2392
02:09:54.399 --> 02:09:56.039
<v Speaker 2>do you think do you agree with me you're dodging.

2393
02:09:56.079 --> 02:09:59.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm answering on behalf of Roman Catholic theology that we have.

2394
02:09:59.399 --> 02:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>What are you dodg because you're also you're dodging my question?

2395
02:10:02.319 --> 02:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you dodged him? Or do you think

2396
02:10:03.720 --> 02:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you give an absolute answer?

2397
02:10:04.880 --> 02:10:08.239
<v Speaker 2>I gave an absolute answer. What is your absolute answer?

2398
02:10:08.239 --> 02:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I just I just want to know. For the absolute

2399
02:10:09.840 --> 02:10:13.039
<v Speaker 2>answer is when we say active spiration we mean that

2400
02:10:13.119 --> 02:10:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the Father causes the Holy Spirit through the hypostasies of

2401
02:10:18.359 --> 02:10:22.359
<v Speaker 2>the hypostasis of the sun. These are active because the

2402
02:10:22.439 --> 02:10:32.119
<v Speaker 2>sun aids Uh. The view of John Damascene is literally source, Father, River, Sun, lake, Spirit.

2403
02:10:32.199 --> 02:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>So he's saying, well, well, what does the spirit do?

2404
02:10:34.159 --> 02:10:37.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, well, in Roman Catholic theology, which is perfectly

2405
02:10:37.399 --> 02:10:41.239
<v Speaker 2>uh philly Okuwa is perfectly square with this analogy, With

2406
02:10:41.359 --> 02:10:44.279
<v Speaker 2>this analogy that we would say that that is what's

2407
02:10:44.319 --> 02:10:47.239
<v Speaker 2>called a passive spiration. He receives it.

2408
02:10:47.840 --> 02:10:52.359
<v Speaker 3>And it's a difficult question, as he asked many times,

2409
02:10:52.359 --> 02:10:55.039
<v Speaker 3>as he was asked many times, was when you said

2410
02:10:55.039 --> 02:10:58.039
<v Speaker 3>that the spirit is a cause, which you affirmed multiple times.

2411
02:10:58.439 --> 02:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I asked you cause of who are what? And you

2412
02:11:00.760 --> 02:11:03.319
<v Speaker 2>had no answer. No, I didn't have no answer. I

2413
02:11:03.399 --> 02:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>was saying that the spirit is caused. And this is

2414
02:11:06.760 --> 02:11:09.399
<v Speaker 2>this is why you say it's subordinate. You said he's

2415
02:11:09.399 --> 02:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a call I said, he's a passive spirator of who

2416
02:11:13.000 --> 02:11:15.399
<v Speaker 2>or what? So he's saying he's he's a spy ray

2417
02:11:15.439 --> 02:11:17.720
<v Speaker 2>to or of who are what does the passive voice

2418
02:11:17.760 --> 02:11:20.279
<v Speaker 2>as a verb have Does it mean cause or does

2419
02:11:20.319 --> 02:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>it assert a cause has been done? He's a cause

2420
02:11:22.840 --> 02:11:25.680
<v Speaker 2>grammatical you said he's a cause. I feel like I

2421
02:11:25.680 --> 02:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>feel like we're arguing semantics. I feel like this is

2422
02:11:27.880 --> 02:11:31.039
<v Speaker 2>semantics because you're saying one thing, he's saying another, and

2423
02:11:31.079 --> 02:11:33.039
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we're getting We're not getting nowhere. I'm

2424
02:11:33.079 --> 02:11:36.319
<v Speaker 2>just giving the answer. According to our theology, we the

2425
02:11:36.319 --> 02:11:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit is a passive spirator. That's the whore that

2426
02:11:39.159 --> 02:11:43.319
<v Speaker 2>can be who are what? The Holy Spirit receives spiration

2427
02:11:43.640 --> 02:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>from God through the sun, and he receives it. Okay,

2428
02:11:47.880 --> 02:11:53.479
<v Speaker 2>Is that clear generation produces the sun? Right? Yes, generation produces.

2429
02:11:53.159 --> 02:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So let me go to this because because of the

2430
02:11:55.800 --> 02:11:57.239
<v Speaker 1>statements here, we're not going to go very long on

2431
02:11:57.279 --> 02:11:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the closing. I want to give it it basically like

2432
02:11:59.199 --> 02:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a well basic called a second rebuttal bit of closing

2433
02:12:01.960 --> 02:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because there's a miscommunication or an intentional dodging. But I

2434
02:12:05.840 --> 02:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>am going to stay completely unbiased in the moderation. Say,

2435
02:12:08.840 --> 02:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I will leave the chat up. I want to know

2436
02:12:10.760 --> 02:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from you guys in the chat. We'll switch it up

2437
02:12:13.720 --> 02:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the ones in the chat. If you think that uh,

2438
02:12:16.520 --> 02:12:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Timothy answered the question and that he answered it according

2439
02:12:20.279 --> 02:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to what he said, two's in the chat. If you

2440
02:12:21.640 --> 02:12:24.119
<v Speaker 1>think he's lying slash dodging. I guess you could use

2441
02:12:24.119 --> 02:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>different words upending what you think and agree with Jay

2442
02:12:26.479 --> 02:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and someone's like, I've seen the chat you accusing me

2443
02:12:28.479 --> 02:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of agree with both of them. I am neither orthodox

2444
02:12:30.880 --> 02:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>nor Catholics. You guys can all hate me because I'm

2445
02:12:33.239 --> 02:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>neither and I don't have a.

2446
02:12:34.920 --> 02:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I just articulated what the view is. Articulated you. You've

2447
02:12:41.640 --> 02:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>given that answer four times in acting. All right, so

2448
02:12:43.880 --> 02:12:44.479
<v Speaker 2>let me let me go to this.

2449
02:12:44.560 --> 02:12:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna don't you know what aspiration means because you

2450
02:12:48.319 --> 02:12:52.479
<v Speaker 3>said he cause he's a cause I said you said that.

2451
02:12:52.720 --> 02:12:55.279
<v Speaker 2>If I said that when you're sputtering out sentence fragments

2452
02:12:55.319 --> 02:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>in the cross X, I never said that. I never

2453
02:12:57.760 --> 02:12:59.159
<v Speaker 2>intended to say the spirits.

2454
02:12:58.960 --> 02:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Cause that's why you got silent and had to think

2455
02:13:00.800 --> 02:13:02.079
<v Speaker 3>about how to talk your way out of it.

2456
02:13:02.199 --> 02:13:05.359
<v Speaker 2>I got silent because I'm trying to talk over because no,

2457
02:13:05.439 --> 02:13:06.159
<v Speaker 2>that's not true.

2458
02:13:06.319 --> 02:13:08.640
<v Speaker 3>The Holy Spirit doesn't have the power of the son, right,

2459
02:13:11.600 --> 02:13:13.399
<v Speaker 3>so he's subordinated, so he's lacking a power.

2460
02:13:13.560 --> 02:13:17.319
<v Speaker 2>No, no, we say he's not subordinated because he is

2461
02:13:17.399 --> 02:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a passive. But he doesn't produce a person. Right on

2462
02:13:20.800 --> 02:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>your view, you are the Son to the Father.

2463
02:13:24.079 --> 02:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>There is subordination in the trinity, yeah, role subordination, not

2464
02:13:27.640 --> 02:13:28.720
<v Speaker 3>ontological subordination.

2465
02:13:28.760 --> 02:13:33.399
<v Speaker 2>That's called monarchia. Yeah yeah, except no, that's not true.

2466
02:13:33.439 --> 02:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>You're picking who's subordinated, either the Holy Smell or the

2467
02:13:36.720 --> 02:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Son together. No, no, that's a logical.

2468
02:13:39.239 --> 02:13:42.119
<v Speaker 3>Does Jesus say that he worships the Father and he

2469
02:13:42.199 --> 02:13:43.079
<v Speaker 3>does the Father's will?

2470
02:13:44.359 --> 02:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Does the role of subordination role? No, No, you don't know. Basically,

2471
02:13:49.640 --> 02:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>he says that the Father has is mine as well.

2472
02:13:52.880 --> 02:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Does he says, let me come here, let.

2473
02:13:54.720 --> 02:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Me come here and ask you a question, Because from

2474
02:13:57.000 --> 02:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's not as well versed in the news of

2475
02:14:01.359 --> 02:14:05.119
<v Speaker 1>this debate between Catholics and Orthodox it would just, in

2476
02:14:05.199 --> 02:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a structural sense, seem like perhaps you're avoiding answering something

2477
02:14:09.720 --> 02:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>directly to avoid being seen as crazy or to like

2478
02:14:12.800 --> 02:14:14.279
<v Speaker 1>not be seen as in Saint colag If somebody you

2479
02:14:14.319 --> 02:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>know asked someone like, oh, are you a good question,

2480
02:14:16.760 --> 02:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>like are you a white supremacist or something, and you know,

2481
02:14:18.560 --> 02:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like a question. If you answer it,

2482
02:14:21.319 --> 02:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of screwed either way. If you say no,

2483
02:14:22.800 --> 02:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna get mad because you don't like your race.

2484
02:14:24.680 --> 02:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>If you say yes, they're going to call you an

2485
02:14:25.920 --> 02:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>extremists and try to disqualify you.

2486
02:14:27.840 --> 02:14:29.319
<v Speaker 2>So it comes across like there's a little bit of

2487
02:14:29.319 --> 02:14:34.199
<v Speaker 2>that moving around. Understand, you're saying I'm lying because he's

2488
02:14:35.079 --> 02:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>questions I'm saying. I'm saying I'm saying to me, I'm

2489
02:14:37.960 --> 02:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm getting the dancing. I'm not saying it's lying.

2490
02:14:41.079 --> 02:14:43.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm singing that. Like, maybe there's a more direct way

2491
02:14:43.079 --> 02:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you want to answer it that you're not saying. He's saying.

2492
02:14:46.039 --> 02:14:48.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what he's saying you're lying about because

2493
02:14:48.319 --> 02:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't understand because I don't know if

2494
02:14:52.560 --> 02:14:58.159
<v Speaker 2>you talking about I haven't said it across examination in

2495
02:14:58.199 --> 02:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a cross examination, though, you're harassing the witness. When I said,

2496
02:15:02.399 --> 02:15:06.640
<v Speaker 2>here's our two active spirators, one passive spira, you're like, well,

2497
02:15:06.680 --> 02:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>what is that? I was like, that's our theology. And

2498
02:15:08.640 --> 02:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>then you're like, that's a dodge. That's not a dodge.

2499
02:15:10.760 --> 02:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Two active spirators. We have the father the son.

2500
02:15:14.680 --> 02:15:19.199
<v Speaker 3>I thought the father generated, not spirated the spirit the

2501
02:15:19.239 --> 02:15:24.960
<v Speaker 3>fun Wait, the father general generate right then he spirates, right?

2502
02:15:25.680 --> 02:15:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what I was what I was trying to get

2503
02:15:27.319 --> 02:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>out is the passivity of the spirit. And then you said,

2504
02:15:31.039 --> 02:15:33.319
<v Speaker 2>you said that's a cause. I said, that's not a cause.

2505
02:15:33.920 --> 02:15:36.479
<v Speaker 2>So how many causes are there? I think there's one

2506
02:15:36.800 --> 02:15:39.239
<v Speaker 2>and that's who the father. Okay, but he gives cause

2507
02:15:39.239 --> 02:15:42.880
<v Speaker 2>alary to the son, right, he gives the ability through

2508
02:15:42.920 --> 02:15:43.359
<v Speaker 2>the son.

2509
02:15:43.560 --> 02:15:46.199
<v Speaker 3>So many causes? Is that it's one, but he gives

2510
02:15:46.199 --> 02:15:48.560
<v Speaker 3>it to the son. Yes, this is this is hypostatic.

2511
02:15:48.720 --> 02:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>This is hypostatic.

2512
02:15:50.079 --> 02:15:52.399
<v Speaker 2>What does the son contribute that the father doesn't to

2513
02:15:52.439 --> 02:15:54.159
<v Speaker 2>the to the spiration? Well, I mean, are we just

2514
02:15:54.199 --> 02:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>going on an extra cross examination? Oh so he doesn't

2515
02:15:57.760 --> 02:15:58.199
<v Speaker 2>want to answer that.

2516
02:15:58.319 --> 02:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, so I don't want And we could take

2517
02:16:00.560 --> 02:16:03.239
<v Speaker 1>this conclusions as a little extension to see where if

2518
02:16:03.239 --> 02:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys, could further explain your position only because of

2519
02:16:06.000 --> 02:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who's trying to position.

2520
02:16:07.920 --> 02:16:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Let's just go ahead with it as trying to understand

2521
02:16:11.079 --> 02:16:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the position. I'm thinking about the audience. And if you were,

2522
02:16:13.840 --> 02:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>let's say, a prop sitting here and you're not familiar

2523
02:16:16.199 --> 02:16:19.479
<v Speaker 2>with the you know, consequential dogma from from Catholics or

2524
02:16:19.520 --> 02:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>from Orthodox I'm sitting here like trying to actually understand

2525
02:16:23.800 --> 02:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying. And I am not accusing you of lying.

2526
02:16:26.800 --> 02:16:28.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm actual accusing you of doing nothing.

2527
02:16:28.399 --> 02:16:31.399
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying to me, I'm like, okay, I know,

2528
02:16:31.479 --> 02:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't know if you were jumping around from what

2529
02:16:33.879 --> 02:16:34.319
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, or.

2530
02:16:34.319 --> 02:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>You can understand the Orthodox view of the Trinity from

2531
02:16:36.600 --> 02:16:41.159
<v Speaker 2>what he said. That's a good question. So let's let's

2532
02:16:41.200 --> 02:16:43.559
<v Speaker 2>do a question, because if you're being object no, no,

2533
02:16:44.959 --> 02:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you're lying something, I wouldn't know if you're lying, right,

2534
02:16:46.799 --> 02:16:49.159
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't know if you're dodging him, or if you're lying,

2535
02:16:49.159 --> 02:16:49.639
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't know.

2536
02:16:49.760 --> 02:16:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying he's lying about the Catholic position, that

2537
02:16:54.159 --> 02:16:56.520
<v Speaker 3>he's representing the Catholic position. I'm saying that in the

2538
02:16:56.639 --> 02:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>course of that discourse, he's lying about what he previously

2539
02:17:00.079 --> 02:17:01.799
<v Speaker 3>he said saying no, I never said that when he

2540
02:17:01.799 --> 02:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>did say the cause part, yes.

2541
02:17:03.639 --> 02:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, because that's how I thought. Okay, Then I got confused.

2542
02:17:05.520 --> 02:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was saying that you were not right.

2543
02:17:06.680 --> 02:17:09.559
<v Speaker 2>I said it was unintentional. And if you said, is

2544
02:17:09.600 --> 02:17:11.239
<v Speaker 2>it a cause, and I've said yeah, yeah, yeah, So

2545
02:17:11.280 --> 02:17:14.120
<v Speaker 2>half the time I'm brushing you off. That's not the

2546
02:17:14.440 --> 02:17:17.319
<v Speaker 2>That's what this was all about. I was saying a

2547
02:17:17.440 --> 02:17:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Roman Catholic point of view. Well, it's not a misunderstanding

2548
02:17:20.319 --> 02:17:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the Roman Catholic point of view. I said, all along,

2549
02:17:22.760 --> 02:17:26.479
<v Speaker 2>we have these two. I mean, it's an upside down triangle.

2550
02:17:27.159 --> 02:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And all I was saying is it's subordination. Uh, he's

2551
02:17:33.079 --> 02:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>accusing us of subordination just because I cited John chapter

2552
02:17:37.680 --> 02:17:41.360
<v Speaker 2>sixteen where Jesus says, all the Father has I have

2553
02:17:41.440 --> 02:17:45.360
<v Speaker 2>as well, And he's saying, well, then he cannot the Essence,

2554
02:17:45.399 --> 02:17:47.639
<v Speaker 2>the Divine Essence cannot come to the Holy Spirit through

2555
02:17:47.680 --> 02:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the sun.

2556
02:17:48.120 --> 02:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>That's not what I said. You don't even understand the argument,

2557
02:17:50.399 --> 02:17:52.280
<v Speaker 3>making a very clear argument. You're in it seems to

2558
02:17:52.280 --> 02:17:56.399
<v Speaker 3>be not understanding that because it's basic and it's very simple.

2559
02:17:56.840 --> 02:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Read it's very simple. Did you read the mistagogees, it's

2560
02:17:59.920 --> 02:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>very're gonna cut that. We're gonna cut that there. And

2561
02:18:02.840 --> 02:18:04.600
<v Speaker 2>by the way, to the people saying I'm trying to understand,

2562
02:18:04.639 --> 02:18:06.079
<v Speaker 2>because if you don't know, I'm just saying in a

2563
02:18:06.159 --> 02:18:08.239
<v Speaker 2>very basic sense, I'm like you, guys.

2564
02:18:08.280 --> 02:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason why we're hosting this debate, and

2565
02:18:09.799 --> 02:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very important, is personally, I'm very interested

2566
02:18:12.760 --> 02:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in understanding what church I should go to. Whether Catholic

2567
02:18:16.000 --> 02:18:17.559
<v Speaker 1>is a church to join and to become a part of,

2568
02:18:17.600 --> 02:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>whether Orthodox.

2569
02:18:18.440 --> 02:18:19.879
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of you guys are searching this too.

2570
02:18:20.239 --> 02:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a lot of you guys who are

2571
02:18:21.479 --> 02:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Catholic or Orthodox may be wanting to uh, you know,

2572
02:18:24.440 --> 02:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>revert or convert whatever you want to call it in

2573
02:18:26.319 --> 02:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>your language into the other uh uh you know order.

2574
02:18:30.040 --> 02:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But for myself, you know, because just because I started

2575
02:18:32.319 --> 02:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>attending a Catholic church, I've been to an Orthodox church

2576
02:18:34.479 --> 02:18:37.079
<v Speaker 1>before too. For a while, I've gone to a Catholic church,

2577
02:18:37.319 --> 02:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they aren't always very open about exactly what

2578
02:18:39.959 --> 02:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they believe.

2579
02:18:40.360 --> 02:18:41.479
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of disagreements.

2580
02:18:41.600 --> 02:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So kind of the point of this is, is someone like

2581
02:18:43.159 --> 02:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>myself to sit here and try to make sure if

2582
02:18:45.040 --> 02:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he's saying he's lying. I'm just asking what he's saying

2583
02:18:47.280 --> 02:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>he' lying about. Is he saying about what he said

2584
02:18:48.840 --> 02:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>previously or about the Catholic's position, because I'm interested to

2585
02:18:51.440 --> 02:18:53.079
<v Speaker 1>find out to make sure I'm getting the correct position,

2586
02:18:53.079 --> 02:18:54.799
<v Speaker 1>and if if that's a correct position, I appreciate it

2587
02:18:54.840 --> 02:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and your position. However, I do think in a quick

2588
02:18:57.479 --> 02:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in a quick summary, like if you could do in

2589
02:19:00.200 --> 02:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like one paragraph, just what is the official Orthodox position

2590
02:19:05.120 --> 02:19:06.719
<v Speaker 1>on this on this topic, because.

2591
02:19:06.520 --> 02:19:07.799
<v Speaker 2>It was a lot of this back and forth and

2592
02:19:07.840 --> 02:19:10.680
<v Speaker 2>then you you go, is this the closing statements correct? Correct?

2593
02:19:10.680 --> 02:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>For the section I stated succinctly what the Catholic position is.

2594
02:19:13.639 --> 02:19:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I'm just saying, but inside with an end

2595
02:19:15.959 --> 02:19:17.959
<v Speaker 1>summary and make sure you restate it just for people

2596
02:19:17.959 --> 02:19:20.239
<v Speaker 1>who were new to the stream or who got lost

2597
02:19:20.239 --> 02:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>in the argument and the tit for tat what what

2598
02:19:22.319 --> 02:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>was it? And if you could finish, and then we'll

2599
02:19:23.959 --> 02:19:25.239
<v Speaker 1>have you, we'll have you closed as well.

2600
02:19:25.319 --> 02:19:25.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2601
02:19:25.559 --> 02:19:28.159
<v Speaker 3>So essentially what I'm taking issue with is the idea

2602
02:19:28.319 --> 02:19:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that he said if the son does not spi rate,

2603
02:19:33.680 --> 02:19:37.639
<v Speaker 3>he's subordinated because he's not having all that the father has.

2604
02:19:39.239 --> 02:19:44.479
<v Speaker 2>So I ask, does the spirit spi rate? And or

2605
02:19:44.520 --> 02:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>excuse me?

2606
02:19:45.239 --> 02:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then he says he's a passive he passively

2607
02:19:49.079 --> 02:19:49.719
<v Speaker 3>spir rates.

2608
02:19:49.920 --> 02:19:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I say, who does the spir rate?

2609
02:19:52.520 --> 02:19:56.479
<v Speaker 3>He says, he aspirated passively because he receives spiration.

2610
02:19:56.719 --> 02:19:57.920
<v Speaker 2>That's what passive means.

2611
02:19:57.719 --> 02:20:01.559
<v Speaker 3>Because he thinks that being spy rated is spiration, which

2612
02:20:01.600 --> 02:20:05.879
<v Speaker 3>is a basic blunder. No, moving on, I'm doing my talk,

2613
02:20:06.120 --> 02:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>so you hush please, moving on, he says, I mean,

2614
02:20:13.239 --> 02:20:15.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry that you just dizz bad in this section.

2615
02:20:15.559 --> 02:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Dude. It would have helped if you'd read the Mystagajy,

2616
02:20:18.159 --> 02:20:22.200
<v Speaker 2>but you didn't. Passive spiration, you didn't. You said you did.

2617
02:20:23.159 --> 02:20:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Stop stop, let's keep it. You go here and then

2618
02:20:26.120 --> 02:20:27.879
<v Speaker 2>we'll switch. You can make fun of me all you want,

2619
02:20:27.879 --> 02:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and you're let's.

2620
02:20:28.639 --> 02:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Keep let's keep the personal tax out and let's go

2621
02:20:30.360 --> 02:20:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and just explain the facts, and then we'll go over

2622
02:20:32.319 --> 02:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to Tim.

2623
02:20:32.600 --> 02:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>He'll explain the facts as well. So I understand. You know,

2624
02:20:35.719 --> 02:20:37.159
<v Speaker 2>he's got a lot going on, he's busy.

2625
02:20:37.200 --> 02:20:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't fault him for not reading the stuff that

2626
02:20:39.959 --> 02:20:42.559
<v Speaker 3>I send, but it's been multiple years where I've linked

2627
02:20:42.559 --> 02:20:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and sent him these texts which he hasn't read. If

2628
02:20:44.920 --> 02:20:46.840
<v Speaker 3>you had read the Mystagogy, he would know that. One

2629
02:20:46.840 --> 02:20:50.399
<v Speaker 3>of the first arguments in the mystagaji Uh, and it's

2630
02:20:50.760 --> 02:20:52.959
<v Speaker 3>stated it multiple times over. It's also repeated in the

2631
02:20:53.000 --> 02:20:56.799
<v Speaker 3>appredicted Treatise of Sant Gregory Palmis by the Way centuries later.

2632
02:20:57.000 --> 02:21:00.479
<v Speaker 3>The same argument that to say that there's sport nation

2633
02:21:00.840 --> 02:21:04.159
<v Speaker 3>because the son doesn't have the power of causality becomes

2634
02:21:04.159 --> 02:21:08.360
<v Speaker 3>a problem because the Holy Spirit now lacks that causality.

2635
02:21:08.760 --> 02:21:11.879
<v Speaker 3>To talk about passive spiration and to equate that with

2636
02:21:13.000 --> 02:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>to to equate being spirrated with spiration is just so silly.

2637
02:21:16.799 --> 02:21:18.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know how to respond to it. It's

2638
02:21:18.440 --> 02:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>it's fundamentally stupid.

2639
02:21:19.879 --> 02:21:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Because spiration is what picks out the Holy Spirit. Generation

2640
02:21:24.680 --> 02:21:25.680
<v Speaker 2>is what picks out the Son.

2641
02:21:25.719 --> 02:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>They're called hypostetic properties, and for Orthodox we relate them

2642
02:21:29.159 --> 02:21:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to the Father in relations of origin. That's the Orthodox teaching.

2643
02:21:32.639 --> 02:21:35.680
<v Speaker 3>The Cabadocians, it's restated. You want to read Loski's paper

2644
02:21:35.719 --> 02:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>called the Procession of the Holy Spirit Orthodox Doctrine. You can

2645
02:21:38.280 --> 02:21:40.680
<v Speaker 3>also read a Roman Catholic that talks about this and

2646
02:21:40.719 --> 02:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>admits all my points by Eaves Kongar. He wrote an

2647
02:21:43.520 --> 02:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>essay about Augustine relations of opposition and the Cappadocians, which

2648
02:21:46.920 --> 02:21:50.639
<v Speaker 3>also makes all of my arguments. So again, our position

2649
02:21:50.760 --> 02:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>is that the Father is the one true God. He

2650
02:21:53.600 --> 02:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>is the sole archae, the monarchia. It is the teaching

2651
02:21:56.520 --> 02:21:59.920
<v Speaker 3>of Constantinople One. The Cappadocians don't teach the Philly oquaper,

2652
02:22:00.079 --> 02:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>so I said, because causality is the hyposthetic.

2653
02:22:02.760 --> 02:22:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Property that is not communicable.

2654
02:22:05.079 --> 02:22:08.760
<v Speaker 3>And again the argument that the son becomes the cause,

2655
02:22:09.600 --> 02:22:12.799
<v Speaker 3>imbalances the trinity and creates a diad because no one

2656
02:22:13.120 --> 02:22:16.000
<v Speaker 3>teaches that the spirit is a cause, and so he

2657
02:22:16.120 --> 02:22:20.159
<v Speaker 3>lacks causality in both the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox model.

2658
02:22:20.399 --> 02:22:23.799
<v Speaker 3>But we're consistent because we don't give the father's unique

2659
02:22:24.000 --> 02:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>hypostatic marker and property of being cause to the son.

2660
02:22:28.879 --> 02:22:30.719
<v Speaker 1>And just to ask you simply, do you feel like

2661
02:22:30.719 --> 02:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he he dictated correctly or at least to what you

2662
02:22:35.319 --> 02:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>know to be the actual position of the Orthodox Church

2663
02:22:37.639 --> 02:22:39.719
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. Yeah, okay, you do. So I just

2664
02:22:39.719 --> 02:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that that's so we're clear because

2665
02:22:41.639 --> 02:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the chat, you know, was a little bit all over

2666
02:22:43.040 --> 02:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the place, not not knowing what was going on.

2667
02:22:44.520 --> 02:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>All right.

2668
02:22:44.879 --> 02:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>So then going over to Timothy, also to Jay, please

2669
02:22:48.159 --> 02:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>don't interrupt. We're gonna just keep this a straight, a

2670
02:22:50.280 --> 02:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>straight uh diatribe here. So if you want to go

2671
02:22:53.440 --> 02:22:55.959
<v Speaker 1>ahead and give your position, one.

2672
02:22:55.360 --> 02:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Off Jay's tricks is he'll laugh at the Roman Catholic position,

2673
02:22:59.120 --> 02:23:01.559
<v Speaker 2>which which he knows what it is, and then he'll

2674
02:23:01.600 --> 02:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>ask for a term to be identified, like passive spiration,

2675
02:23:07.239 --> 02:23:10.559
<v Speaker 2>as if it's being made up ex nilo or something,

2676
02:23:10.600 --> 02:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and he'll say, well, how does that relate to Orthodox theology?

2677
02:23:14.680 --> 02:23:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And I was saying, well, it doesn't. That's the tension

2678
02:23:17.280 --> 02:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that exists between the Orthodox and the Catholic position. And

2679
02:23:21.280 --> 02:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>he laughs, and then all of the Bots in Chat say, oh, okay,

2680
02:23:25.959 --> 02:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>a good score. I would go back to the heart

2681
02:23:29.799 --> 02:23:35.319
<v Speaker 2>of Trinitarian theology for Roman Catholics, which really has to

2682
02:23:35.360 --> 02:23:42.360
<v Speaker 2>do with actus purus, the fact that the consubstantial Father Son,

2683
02:23:42.440 --> 02:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Holy Spirit relate to one another oppositionally. And this is

2684
02:23:47.600 --> 02:23:51.200
<v Speaker 2>within the substance. He was making fun of the term usiological.

2685
02:23:51.280 --> 02:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>That just means they all relate within one substance. There's

2686
02:23:54.239 --> 02:23:59.360
<v Speaker 2>nothing uncreated outside the substance of God, the Divine Essence,

2687
02:23:59.360 --> 02:24:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Father Son, hohold Spirit. They relate to each other with

2688
02:24:03.280 --> 02:24:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a distinction, a distinction of operation. Jay had this infamous

2689
02:24:09.000 --> 02:24:12.920
<v Speaker 2>debate with Christian Wagner where Christian Wagner was getting him

2690
02:24:12.920 --> 02:24:16.399
<v Speaker 2>to admit, essentially that he didn't understand what a relation

2691
02:24:16.479 --> 02:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of opposition was. I brought this up today and I

2692
02:24:20.959 --> 02:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>was saying, Okay, have you ever played paper scissors rock?

2693
02:24:23.600 --> 02:24:26.559
<v Speaker 2>The reason I did that is because paper Scissors Rock

2694
02:24:26.719 --> 02:24:31.520
<v Speaker 2>proves that conceptually, at least at the very least conceptually

2695
02:24:32.159 --> 02:24:35.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're trying to win paper scissors rock Triadic relations

2696
02:24:35.559 --> 02:24:40.879
<v Speaker 2>of opposition do exist. Just because there are three couplets

2697
02:24:41.360 --> 02:24:47.639
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that there is not individual tension or opposition

2698
02:24:47.799 --> 02:24:52.440
<v Speaker 2>or a dichotomy between ab BC and c A. This

2699
02:24:52.600 --> 02:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely nonsensical. It was an embarrassment that Jay said this,

2700
02:24:56.760 --> 02:24:59.319
<v Speaker 2>and I was saying, Okay, that's fine. When I brought

2701
02:24:59.319 --> 02:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>this up with him earlier, he said, we'll prove that

2702
02:25:01.200 --> 02:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that exists for the Trinity. I'm just proving that it's

2703
02:25:03.799 --> 02:25:08.360
<v Speaker 2>conceptually possible. So it's an embarrassment to say that, to

2704
02:25:08.440 --> 02:25:12.399
<v Speaker 2>deny that the relations of opposition which characterized the Catholic

2705
02:25:12.520 --> 02:25:15.479
<v Speaker 2>view of the Trinity, which work very very well, because

2706
02:25:15.520 --> 02:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>then we don't end up having deposit in uncreated energy

2707
02:25:21.760 --> 02:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>outside of God that is not created, not a creature,

2708
02:25:26.440 --> 02:25:30.479
<v Speaker 2>but is really distinct from God, which is a nonsense term.

2709
02:25:30.639 --> 02:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>It means to gods are more or infinite gods. As

2710
02:25:33.239 --> 02:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Jay said earlier, infinite divine energies. He said, infinite divine energies.

2711
02:25:38.479 --> 02:25:41.319
<v Speaker 2>You're going to say, I'm that's not a lie. That's

2712
02:25:41.559 --> 02:25:46.959
<v Speaker 2>what I said. That's what I'm saying. That's an absurdity.

2713
02:25:47.399 --> 02:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>We avoid this problem by saying we allow distinctions within

2714
02:25:50.879 --> 02:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the substance of God, we don't allow distinctions within God

2715
02:25:57.280 --> 02:26:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that would be concerning or about another other essence, an

2716
02:26:02.079 --> 02:26:06.200
<v Speaker 2>essence and energy's distinction. And this all boils down to

2717
02:26:06.399 --> 02:26:09.719
<v Speaker 2>relations of opposition, which jay I still am not clear

2718
02:26:09.760 --> 02:26:12.879
<v Speaker 2>on his position whether or not whether or not relations

2719
02:26:12.920 --> 02:26:17.479
<v Speaker 2>of opposition can exist within a threesome within a triad?

2720
02:26:19.399 --> 02:26:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Can they that you think the trendy is a threesome?

2721
02:26:22.559 --> 02:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>It's it's three? Do they? Do they exist? What exists?

2722
02:26:27.360 --> 02:26:30.959
<v Speaker 2>Can a B and C oppose one another? Within the

2723
02:26:31.040 --> 02:26:33.360
<v Speaker 2>triad of holy.

2724
02:26:33.120 --> 02:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Spiatistic number theory diad relates to two, not a triad?

2725
02:26:37.120 --> 02:26:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, diet is always two. That's not what I'm asking.

2726
02:26:39.920 --> 02:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no opposition in a triad because opposition is a diet. No,

2727
02:26:44.000 --> 02:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>there can be opposition within individual constituents of a tria. Okay,

2728
02:26:48.719 --> 02:26:51.799
<v Speaker 2>so for for all time, I want this on records.

2729
02:26:52.000 --> 02:26:54.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean again, how much time do I have left?

2730
02:26:54.920 --> 02:26:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Technically here on the clock you have you have ten seconds?

2731
02:26:56.959 --> 02:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>When can give you extra thirty seconds if you need? All? Right?

2732
02:26:59.440 --> 02:27:02.959
<v Speaker 2>So within a triad, so people know when we're talking

2733
02:27:03.040 --> 02:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>mathematically here, individual can can maintain their opposition, their contrariety.

2734
02:27:13.200 --> 02:27:15.680
<v Speaker 2>This is a matter of simple fact. And Jay said,

2735
02:27:15.680 --> 02:27:17.680
<v Speaker 2>as a matter of simple fact, that can't even happen.

2736
02:27:18.159 --> 02:27:20.479
<v Speaker 2>When I pressed him on this, he said, oh, that's

2737
02:27:20.520 --> 02:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>only within the trinity. You lose. That's wrong. No, yep,

2738
02:27:24.079 --> 02:27:24.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand.

2739
02:27:24.879 --> 02:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Wrong.

2740
02:27:25.040 --> 02:27:29.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, it's very very simple, you thought, because don't

2741
02:27:29.520 --> 02:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>into three the opposition. This is central understanding correctly what

2742
02:27:38.079 --> 02:27:39.879
<v Speaker 2>I said, that's what What did you say? Then?

2743
02:27:40.079 --> 02:27:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I said that diad in Patristic numbering example, right, it's

2744
02:27:46.200 --> 02:27:49.360
<v Speaker 3>it's counting by division. Do you know what that is?

2745
02:27:49.399 --> 02:27:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Of course, versus what counting by identity? You don't know

2746
02:27:53.799 --> 02:27:54.239
<v Speaker 3>those things.

2747
02:27:54.319 --> 02:27:58.760
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what it was. My question explaining to

2748
02:27:58.840 --> 02:28:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you that you don't know that Tristan within theology counts triads.

2749
02:28:05.079 --> 02:28:06.959
<v Speaker 2>If you had debated the Muslims, you would know, because

2750
02:28:07.000 --> 02:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to do this. You said no, and you're

2751
02:28:09.040 --> 02:28:10.680
<v Speaker 2>like a Muslim because you don't know how there's two

2752
02:28:10.680 --> 02:28:12.840
<v Speaker 2>different ways. You said, no, there's two different ways to count.

2753
02:28:12.879 --> 02:28:17.040
<v Speaker 2>You told you told Christian counting debate because you don't

2754
02:28:17.319 --> 02:28:20.159
<v Speaker 2>you nor him understand this point. If you'd read Kogar

2755
02:28:20.559 --> 02:28:24.159
<v Speaker 2>on this point, he says what I'm saying. I don't

2756
02:28:24.200 --> 02:28:26.399
<v Speaker 2>have to have read Coongar right, because you know these

2757
02:28:26.440 --> 02:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>economies want dichotomy is not a relation of opposition, Elijah,

2758
02:28:33.000 --> 02:28:35.760
<v Speaker 2>do you understand economy is not a relation of opposition?

2759
02:28:35.959 --> 02:28:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is.

2760
02:28:36.639 --> 02:28:39.399
<v Speaker 2>It's all right, I'm you Dichotomy is not a relation

2761
02:28:39.479 --> 02:28:40.159
<v Speaker 2>of opposition.

2762
02:28:41.360 --> 02:28:45.040
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be paper because it talks about can

2763
02:28:45.399 --> 02:28:47.479
<v Speaker 3>economy is not a relation of opposition.

2764
02:28:47.559 --> 02:28:49.959
<v Speaker 2>That's the most absurd thing. For a second, you have

2765
02:28:50.000 --> 02:28:51.239
<v Speaker 2>you have, you have a choice. I'm gonna give us

2766
02:28:51.239 --> 02:28:51.719
<v Speaker 2>a choice here.

2767
02:28:52.239 --> 02:28:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Either A we can continue arguing this, but then we're

2768
02:28:54.360 --> 02:28:55.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to skip the third topic altogether.

2769
02:28:56.319 --> 02:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Do the timing of the debate. Uh, and what's what's

2770
02:28:58.959 --> 02:29:00.479
<v Speaker 2>going on here? I want the paper?

2771
02:29:00.760 --> 02:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then so then if that's then we're gonna

2772
02:29:02.760 --> 02:29:04.799
<v Speaker 1>agree to disagree on what that is and we can

2773
02:29:04.840 --> 02:29:06.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about things later. But I think we're gonna leave

2774
02:29:06.879 --> 02:29:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it there. Okay, We're gonna take a couple minute break here.

2775
02:29:08.760 --> 02:29:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, I want to read a couple

2776
02:29:10.120 --> 02:29:12.719
<v Speaker 1>more of the superchats. Remember, if you guys are leaving superchats,

2777
02:29:12.760 --> 02:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll read them as we go along. We appreciate you

2778
02:29:15.000 --> 02:29:17.799
<v Speaker 1>guys doing so. We have Jay Betteley or said Tim,

2779
02:29:17.799 --> 02:29:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're a decent guy.
