Speaker 1: The following presentation is Del Marvis Studio's production. You're listening
Speaker 1: to the fact Hunter Radio Network. Here is your host,
Speaker 1: George Hobbs. Welcome back truth seekers from around the world.
Speaker 1: It's time for another edition of the fact Hunter podcast
Speaker 1: as we record on this late Tuesday afternoon, July the thirtieth,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. I hope everybody had a nice weekend
Speaker 1: and your week got Your week is off to a
Speaker 1: rearing start. Been a very long day here, lots of travel.
Speaker 1: Just got back in about a half an hour ago.
Speaker 1: I had everything prepped last night so we'd be ready
Speaker 1: to go. It was going to be a busy day.
Speaker 1: And as in real time here in the news, things
Speaker 1: in the Middle East are deteriorating very quickly, as reports
Speaker 1: of massive bombing in Beirut and certain leaders assassinated by Israel,
Speaker 1: and again there was rumors that if this did happen,
Speaker 1: Iran was going to get involved. But again reports that
Speaker 1: hezbela leader for Shakur, has been assassinated in Israel by
Speaker 1: in Beirut Lebanon, again by Israel. Things deteriorating quickly, as
Speaker 1: we speculated for quite some time that you know, this
Speaker 1: year once things kicked off, they were going to escalate
Speaker 1: and spiral rather quickly, and that's exactly what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: And you know, keep your eye on the ball, that
Speaker 1: is for sure. And again, if you'd like to stop
Speaker 1: by the website, it is thefact Hunter dot com. Check
Speaker 1: out our articles, listen to our twenty four to seven
Speaker 1: streaming radio, stop in the chatroom and say hello. There's
Speaker 1: always very good conversation going on there. It is Thefacthunter
Speaker 1: dot com. Questions, comments, concerns, you can shoot us an email.
Speaker 1: It is the fact Hunter at mail dot com. Again,
Speaker 1: it is the fact Hunter at mail, not gmail dot com.
Speaker 1: And I am a little behind on those, so I
Speaker 1: ask for your patients as I return emails. The next
Speaker 1: couple days will also be pretty busy, but I'll try
Speaker 1: to get to them hopefully Friday. Get back to the emails.
Speaker 1: So today's subject. If this is the first time you
Speaker 1: are listening to the podcast, you may be like, what
Speaker 1: in the world is this guy talking about? What do
Speaker 1: you mean our nuclear missiles real? What is this guy smoking? Well, again,
Speaker 1: I always try to be cognizant of the fact that
Speaker 1: we get new listeners all the time, and you may
Speaker 1: be brand new to the truth community, and if you are,
Speaker 1: you might want to go back look through the you know,
Speaker 1: scroll through the playlist and find something that's a little
Speaker 1: easy with an entry level, you know, maybe the moon
Speaker 1: landing hoaxes, right, things of that nature. But to the
Speaker 1: longtime listeners, we understand that much of this matre is
Speaker 1: based in deceit to keep us in constant fear, so
Speaker 1: we rely on the government, which enables them to continue
Speaker 1: to rule overs, which they do. Again, if we look
Speaker 1: back just to twenty twenty alone, the authoritarian levels that
Speaker 1: they took it to inexcusable that we put up with it.
Speaker 1: But again, hindsight is twenty twenty. We can't fix the past,
Speaker 1: but we can show and expose the past, the true
Speaker 1: part of the past, right, which is what we continue
Speaker 1: to do and to try to change the future positively, right,
Speaker 1: And that's what we're here to do. So it's important
Speaker 1: that we take everything and question it, and that it
Speaker 1: was from the very get go of this podcast was
Speaker 1: presenting information to the listener, and it's up to you
Speaker 1: to decide whether or not the information we exhibit, you know,
Speaker 1: sustains further research or you make your mind up on
Speaker 1: the spot. Right, and today we are talking about nuclear missiles, right?
Speaker 1: Nuclear holocaust? Is it really a thing? Right? Can man
Speaker 1: decide when the world ends? Interesting to think about. Let's
Speaker 1: go to the official narrative of nuclear holocaust from our
Speaker 1: good friends at Wikipedia. So, nuclear holocaust also known as
Speaker 1: nuclear apocalypse or nuclear armageddon is a theoretical scenario. Isn't
Speaker 1: that interesting how they put that? Where the mass detonation
Speaker 1: of nuclear weapons causes widespread destruction and radioactive fallout. Such
Speaker 1: a scenario invises a large parts of the Earth becoming
Speaker 1: uninhabitable due to the effects of nuclear warfare, potentially causing
Speaker 1: the collapse of civilization. And this is the first kind
Speaker 1: of red flag, the extinction of humanity and the termination
Speaker 1: of most biological life on Earth. Nuclear holocaust became an
Speaker 1: anti nuclear issue with the start of nuclear weapons testing,
Speaker 1: which caused a global fallout with deaths of an estimated
Speaker 1: two point four million people globally until twenty twenty. Because
Speaker 1: of the immediate destructions of cities by nuclear blasts, the
Speaker 1: potential aftermath of a nuclear war could involve firestorms, a
Speaker 1: quote unquote nuclear winter. Again, these words that they already
Speaker 1: have prepped ready to go. Radiation sickness from fallout, which
Speaker 1: radiation sickness is something you can get from satellites, not satellites,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, radars, military radars five G. And it's interesting
Speaker 1: that if you look back at the start of COVID,
Speaker 1: Wuhan was one of Wuhan, China was one of the
Speaker 1: very first places in the world to get five G technology,
Speaker 1: and that is where we started to see the videos
Speaker 1: of people collapsing in the street. And again, if you
Speaker 1: watch Doug and Stacey their YouTube channel, the Homesteaders, within
Speaker 1: the last week, Doug has been taken these EMF settings
Speaker 1: from cell phones and simple routers and all of these things,
Speaker 1: and they're off the charts. And I think our bodies,
Speaker 1: like everything else, they do adapt, but not everybody's body,
Speaker 1: if you will, is able to overcome these things. And
Speaker 1: we saw it with the start of World War One
Speaker 1: and the global sickness that went on. Then. It seems
Speaker 1: like every time a new type of radio technology is introduced,
Speaker 1: there is some type of sickness that goes along to it.
Speaker 1: And if I find that link on YouTube with the
Speaker 1: Dug and Staca where he talks about the EMF, I
Speaker 1: will link that in the show description I'm going to
Speaker 1: write that down real quick so I don't forget so again.
Speaker 1: The other thing they also talking about is the loss
Speaker 1: of modern technology due to an EMP, which is known
Speaker 1: as an electromagnetic pulse. Some scientists, such as Alan Roeboch,
Speaker 1: have speculated that a thermonuclear war could result in the
Speaker 1: end of modern civilization of Earth as we know it,
Speaker 1: part of it due to a long lasting nuclear winter.
Speaker 1: In one model, the average temperature of Earth following a
Speaker 1: full thermonuclear war falls several years by seven to eight
Speaker 1: degrees celsius, which is equivalent to thirteen to fifteen degrees
Speaker 1: fahrenheit on average. And of course all this started off
Speaker 1: with the end of World War II, to the atomic
Speaker 1: bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which we will discuss, and
Speaker 1: then the quote unquote Cold War. Right, we had the
Speaker 1: Civil War, we had reconstruction, we had the Spanish American War,
Speaker 1: we had you know, World War one, world War two,
Speaker 1: and we had Korea, right, and then into Vietnam and
Speaker 1: the Cold War with Russia, which always made absolute no
Speaker 1: sense to me. Here we are we tag team with
Speaker 1: Russia and we save the world and we become immediate enemies,
Speaker 1: right and none of it makes any sense. Again, if
Speaker 1: you look to the people who financed these wars and
Speaker 1: their interest into US teaming up into eliminating said foe,
Speaker 1: it makes a little more sense. But again, much of
Speaker 1: our history does not make any more sense. And in
Speaker 1: order to have a war, whether it's the War on
Speaker 1: drugs or the Cold War, that gives these folks a
Speaker 1: bottomless pocketbook if you will, to fight the war right
Speaker 1: and to build these nuclear missiles. And again, when you're
Speaker 1: talking about fifty billion, five zero billion dollars a year
Speaker 1: to the military industrial complex. Oh, by the way, many
Speaker 1: of the same companies who receive big money from NASA.
Speaker 1: Think about that for just a little bit. Okay, let's
Speaker 1: move along. I'm not sure if there's a perfect rhyme
Speaker 1: or reason for this discussion today. I've put it in
Speaker 1: I think in a semi logical order, and I hope
Speaker 1: you'll bear with me. We're going to move forward to
Speaker 1: March tenth, nineteen forty five. And this was the bombing
Speaker 1: of Tokyo, Okay. And again, this was the night of
Speaker 1: March ninth into March tenth, the United States Army Air
Speaker 1: Forces conducted a dev stating fire bombing raid on Tokyo, Japan,
Speaker 1: the Japanese capital city. This attack was code named Operation
Speaker 1: Meeting House by the Army Air Force and is known
Speaker 1: as the Tokyo Great Air Raid. Now, bombs dropped from
Speaker 1: two hundred and seventy nine Boeing B twenty nine super Fortress,
Speaker 1: and they're very heavy bombers, and they burned out much
Speaker 1: of eastern Tokyo. And you know, if you just put
Speaker 1: the Tokyo fire bombing March nineteen forty five, look at
Speaker 1: the images, and again look at the images of Nagasaki
Speaker 1: in Hiroshima. There is a weird kind of you know
Speaker 1: that they all kind of look the same, right, But
Speaker 1: let's not get ahead of ourselves. More than ninety thousand,
Speaker 1: possibly over one hundred thousand Japanese people were killed. Now
Speaker 1: remember that number on. This is a firebombing, right, not
Speaker 1: an atomic bomb. That's a devastating amount of people. Within
Speaker 1: twenty four hours we killed. The American Army Air Force
Speaker 1: killed approximately one hundred thousand people, and I want to
Speaker 1: reiterate this point, mostly civilians. One hundred thousand, mostly civilians,
Speaker 1: died in fire bombings. One million more were left homeless,
Speaker 1: making it the single most destructive air attack in human history. Okay,
Speaker 1: so let's just stop there. The single most destructive single
Speaker 1: air attack in human history was not the atomic bomb
Speaker 1: on Hiroshima. It was not the you know, the atomic
Speaker 1: on Nagasaki. It was a fire bombing two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy nine Boeing cash in that check Boeing super fortresses.
Speaker 1: And people will argue, well, it's Tokyo more people. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm just introducing the evidenst. I want you to know
Speaker 1: off the top that this was the single most destructive
Speaker 1: air attack in human history. Okay. One hundred thousand civilian
Speaker 1: lives gone, million left homeless. The Japanese air and civil
Speaker 1: defenses proved largely inadequate to the attack. Fourteen American aircraft
Speaker 1: and ninety six airmen were lost. And listen, I don't
Speaker 1: know what the rules of engagement were during World War
Speaker 1: Two where anyone was fair game. I will tell you
Speaker 1: even as we crossed the Berm in March of two
Speaker 1: thousand and three, you just do not kill innocent civilians.
Speaker 1: And people will say, well, you're dropping bombs from the air.
Speaker 1: You don't know who's down there. You know you have
Speaker 1: people on the ground, you know what's down there. So again,
Speaker 1: this is another part of history that most people don't know.
Speaker 1: When you talk about World War two and mass casualties,
Speaker 1: you ask, you know, the old school stand in front
Speaker 1: of Walmart, right, and ask the average joe off the street,
Speaker 1: what was the single most destructive attack during World War Two?
Speaker 1: They will tell you, you know, Nagasaki, they will tell
Speaker 1: you Hiroshima. But it was fire bombing in Tokyo, Japan. Now,
Speaker 1: the attack on Tokyo was an intensification of the air
Speaker 1: raids on Japan which had began prior in June nineteen
Speaker 1: forty four, and prior to this operation, and they had
Speaker 1: focused on precision bombing campaign mostly against military and industrial facilities. Right,
Speaker 1: if you can hit the enemy in their logistics and
Speaker 1: their capability to build tanks and airplanes and bullets and
Speaker 1: beans and all those things, you can devastate a military
Speaker 1: more than just going after the personnel themselves. According to
Speaker 1: most historians, these attacks were generally unsuccessful, which contributed to
Speaker 1: the decision to shift to fire bombing. And again, the
Speaker 1: operation during the early hours of March tenths was the
Speaker 1: most I'm sorry, it was the first major fire bombing
Speaker 1: against a Japanese city, and these Army Air Force units
Speaker 1: employed significantly different tactics. Obviously, right was captain obvious when
Speaker 1: you need him, including bombing by night while flying at
Speaker 1: low altitudes, and the extensive destruction caused by the raid
Speaker 1: led to these tactics become standard operating procedures for the
Speaker 1: B twenty nine s until the end of the war. Now,
Speaker 1: something I didn't know, and anytime I kind of go
Speaker 1: down to the rabbit holes, I learned something new all
Speaker 1: the time. And maybe some of you know this, and
Speaker 1: many of you don't, Okay, but I will tell you.
Speaker 1: I was under the impression that napalm didn't really come
Speaker 1: to be until Vietnam. Right, everybody knows. If you say
Speaker 1: a play word association game, I say napalm, you would
Speaker 1: probably say Vietnam. Maybe you'd say DuPont. I don't know.
Speaker 1: But preparations for firebombing, arraigns, raids pardon me against Japan
Speaker 1: began well before March nineteen forty five. In nineteen forty three,
Speaker 1: the Army Air Force tested the effectiveness of incendiary bombings
Speaker 1: on adjoining German and Japanese style domestic building complexes at
Speaker 1: the Dugway proving grounds. These trials demonstrated that M sixty
Speaker 1: nine and centiaries were particularly effective at starting uncontrollable fires. Now,
Speaker 1: these weapons were dropped from B twenty nine's in clusters
Speaker 1: and they used napalm as their incendiary filler. So these
Speaker 1: bombs were the heat is extreme and it causes fires
Speaker 1: to ravage and after the bomb struck the ground, but
Speaker 1: what happen is a fuse ignited the charge which first
Speaker 1: sprayed napalm from the weapon and then ignited it. So
Speaker 1: all you guys back in the eighties who used to
Speaker 1: take your sister's hair spray and then you know, spray
Speaker 1: it and then light it. That is precisely how it worked.
Speaker 1: And prior to March nineteen forty five they had stockpiles
Speaker 1: of these incinniary bombs were built up in the Mariana
Speaker 1: Islands and they were used to carry out these fire bombings,
Speaker 1: so a lot of devastation. You can see the Prefectural
Speaker 1: Museum of History, Negata, they actually have some of these
Speaker 1: M sixty nine and sindiary cluster bombs on display at
Speaker 1: the museum. So these were weapons that were highly destructive
Speaker 1: and again napalm is this incendiary mixture it's a gelling agent.
Speaker 1: It's a really volatile petrochemical. It's usually a gasoline or
Speaker 1: diesel fuel. The name is portmanteau of the two constituents
Speaker 1: of the original thinking and gelling agents. And this team
Speaker 1: led by m mist Lewis Pfiser, not Pfeiser like the
Speaker 1: h Our friends at Big Pharma. It's Fi s Er.
Speaker 1: And it's interesting when you look at this guy. You know,
Speaker 1: we've talked about vitamin K. This guy is one of
Speaker 1: the original originators of vitamin K. He's a Harvard guy.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to spend time digging deep into him,
Speaker 1: but he was also an Oxford University guy, which kind
Speaker 1: of is a red flag in itself. But this guy,
Speaker 1: Lewis Pfiser, originally developed napon for the US Chemical Warfare
Speaker 1: Service in nineteen forty two and a secret laboratory at
Speaker 1: Harvard University. And you know, people will say, ah, the
Speaker 1: CI is not involved with colleges. Well, it's interesting that
Speaker 1: the US Chemical Warfare Service, in nineteen forty two, in
Speaker 1: a secret laboratory at Harvard University, were the first to
Speaker 1: create napalm. Not of conspiracy theory. It is a fact
Speaker 1: of immediate first interest was its viability as an incendiary
Speaker 1: device to be used in fire bombing campaigns during World
Speaker 1: War Two. Its potential to be coherently projected into a
Speaker 1: solid stream that would carry for distance instead of the
Speaker 1: bloomy fireball of pure gasoline, results in a widespread adoption
Speaker 1: in infantry, in tank and boat mounted flame throwers as well. Right,
Speaker 1: because you have yours. That's all a flamethrower is. You've
Speaker 1: got your little pilot light and when you pull the trigger,
Speaker 1: it shoots out the gas. And that's what all a
Speaker 1: flame thrower really is. It's not this super technology. The
Speaker 1: thing with napalm is it burns at very very extreme
Speaker 1: temperatures upwards of twenty two hundred degrees fahrenheit. That is
Speaker 1: some extreme heat. Also, it should be noted that it
Speaker 1: burns much longer than gasoline. It is more easily dispersed,
Speaker 1: and it sticks to its targets. Right, you see the stuntmen,
Speaker 1: they get a little gas on them, they shoot the
Speaker 1: scene and they put the guy out. This stuff is
Speaker 1: a gel that sticks to its target and burns and
Speaker 1: burns and burns. From a combat point of view, is
Speaker 1: it's extremely effective. However, from a you know, rules of
Speaker 1: war point of view. Well, it's extremely controversial, right, And again,
Speaker 1: the first time it was really used widespread was it's
Speaker 1: incendiaria attacks on Tokyo in March of nineteen forty five.
Speaker 1: Where else was used. It was used in the First
Speaker 1: Indochina War, the Algerian War, Korea, the Six Day War
Speaker 1: with Israel, and of course Vietnam. Right, So there we go,
Speaker 1: just to put into perspective, we're we're going to skip that.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Again,
Speaker 1: this is the official narrative. On August sixth and August ninth,
Speaker 1: nineteen forty five, the United States detonated two atomic bombs
Speaker 1: over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombings
Speaker 1: killed between one hundred and twenty nine thousand and two
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty six thousand people, most of whom were civilians.
Speaker 1: And I will tell you that is quite a range
Speaker 1: of numbers, right, somewhere between one hundred and thirty and
Speaker 1: you know, two hundred quarter million people. That's quite the range.
Speaker 1: But again, most were civilians. Why are we targeting civilians?
Speaker 1: I don't know. And remained the only use of nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons in an armed conflict. Armed conflict. Pardon me, so
Speaker 1: nineteen forty five would have been is it seventy nine
Speaker 1: years ago? Is my math correct? I hope? So only
Speaker 1: twice in almost eighty years have these been used. Japan
Speaker 1: surrendered to the Allies on August fifteenth, six days after
Speaker 1: the bombing of Nagasaki, and by the way, the Soviet
Speaker 1: Union's declaration of war against Japan and the invasion of
Speaker 1: Japanese occupied Manchuria. So what most people think is we
Speaker 1: dropped the two bombs and they said, oh no, no
Speaker 1: more bombs, we give up. That was a part of it.
Speaker 1: But Soviet's declaration of war and of course the invasion
Speaker 1: of Manchuria, which Japan occupied at the time, also was
Speaker 1: extremely instrumental on them waving the white flag. The Japanese
Speaker 1: government signed the Instrument of Surrender on September two, effectively
Speaker 1: ending the war. In the final year of World War Two,
Speaker 1: Allies prepared for a costly invasion of the Japanese mainland,
Speaker 1: and again, according to the official narrative, was that they said,
Speaker 1: if we invaded Japan, the Allies were going to take
Speaker 1: heavy losses. So was there another way to end the
Speaker 1: war without this huge costly invasion of the Allies invading
Speaker 1: the Japanese mainland. So this undertaking was preceded by a
Speaker 1: conventional bombing and fire bombing campaign that we just talked about,
Speaker 1: and it devastated upwards of sixty four Japanese cities. The
Speaker 1: war in the European Theater concluded when Germany surrendered on
Speaker 1: May eighth, nineteen forty five, and at that point the
Speaker 1: Allies turned their full attention to the Pacific War. Now,
Speaker 1: by July nineteen forty five, the Allies Manhattan Project had
Speaker 1: produced two types of atomic bombs. One was called the
Speaker 1: Little Boy, which was an enriched uranium gun type fission weapon,
Speaker 1: and the Fat Man, which was a plutonium implosion type
Speaker 1: of nuclear weapon. The five h ninth Composite Group of
Speaker 1: the United States Army Air Force was trained and equipped
Speaker 1: with specialized silver plate version of the Boeings B twenty
Speaker 1: nine super Fortress, the same ones. Might I add that
Speaker 1: they used for the fire bombings, same same plane, and
Speaker 1: they deployed Tenyon in the Mariana Islands. The Allies called
Speaker 1: for the unconditional surrender of the Imperial Japanese Armed forces
Speaker 1: in the Potsdam declaration on July twenty sixth, nineteen forty five,
Speaker 1: the alternate being prompt and uttered destruction. And if you
Speaker 1: go throughout the realms of US history, we always give
Speaker 1: a deadline. And it's always interesting, right, Like I remember
Speaker 1: being at Fort Dix and the US leadership and the
Speaker 1: Iraqi leadership would go in and the US would give
Speaker 1: this declarations and the enemy would say, no, we don't
Speaker 1: recognize it, and then you know, we go in and
Speaker 1: destroy them rather quickly, and the same narrative as here
Speaker 1: in Japan, and their government ignored the ultimatum. So again,
Speaker 1: on six August, Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima. Three
Speaker 1: days later, Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki. Now, according
Speaker 1: to the official narrative, over the next two to four months,
Speaker 1: the effects of the atomic bombings killed ninety to one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty six thousand people in Hiroshima and sixty
Speaker 1: to eighty thousand people in Nagasaki. They say roughly half
Speaker 1: occurred on the first day, which is interesting how they
Speaker 1: get those totals if it was on the first day.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot more that goes into this, but
Speaker 1: let's close with the end of this. Scholars have extensively
Speaker 1: studied the effects of the bombings on the social and
Speaker 1: political character of subsequent world history and pop culture, and
Speaker 1: there is still much debate concerning the ethical and legal
Speaker 1: justifications for the bombings, and certainly not just Hiroshima Nagasaki,
Speaker 1: but how do you justify the Tokyo fire bombings as well?
Speaker 1: From March. According to supporters, the atomic bombings were necessary
Speaker 1: to bring an end to the war, and just listen
Speaker 1: to what this is. According to supporters, the atomic bombings
Speaker 1: were necessary to bring an end to the war with
Speaker 1: minimal casualties and ultimately prevented a greater loss of life.
Speaker 1: It almost sound like the COVID narrative. Right for the
Speaker 1: greater good. Right, Mama, pop, shut down your business, close
Speaker 1: your churches for the greater good. Everybody get your vaccine,
Speaker 1: right to bring an end to the war on COVID.
Speaker 1: According to the critics, the bombings were unnecessary for the
Speaker 1: war's end and were war crime, raising moral and ethical implications.
Speaker 1: But again, many people believe that this was a syop,
Speaker 1: that they had these things planted on the ground they
Speaker 1: did drop bombs. I will tell you from someone who
Speaker 1: was an engineer in the United States Army and anyone
Speaker 1: who's been in the military know, anytime you do a range,
Speaker 1: you never bring back your remo. You use it all up.
Speaker 1: And in many of the ranges we did as an engineer,
Speaker 1: when we were using C four and debt cord, at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, when it was time to
Speaker 1: go home, we still had all these blocks to see four,
Speaker 1: they would stack it up, run a debt cord to it,
Speaker 1: and you know, set maybe ten minute timer and we
Speaker 1: you know, the first arden would light it as we left.
Speaker 1: We'd stand two miles back and there'd be a huge
Speaker 1: explosion and there would be a small mushroom cloud. Any
Speaker 1: type of you know, major explosion like that, whether it
Speaker 1: be C four or NAFFO, you know, like the Oklahoma
Speaker 1: City whatever, there is a mushroom cloud when there's an explosion.
Speaker 1: And again if you go back to Beirut, which is
Speaker 1: interesting because that I think that's the city that just
Speaker 1: got bombed today by Israel, and that was the same
Speaker 1: city that we saw on August fourth, twenty twenty, which is,
Speaker 1: by the way, Barack Obama's birthday August fourth. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the scene elevenon city right now is just intent. It's insane.
Speaker 1: But you're going to have that mushroom cloud and one
Speaker 1: of the things that raise a lot of people's brow
Speaker 1: is a gentleman by the name of John Hersey, and
Speaker 1: he is known as an American writer journalist. He is
Speaker 1: considered one of the earliest practitioners of so called new journalism,
Speaker 1: in which story telling techniques of fiction and adapted or
Speaker 1: excuse me, are adapted to nonfiction reported. I'm want to
Speaker 1: read this one more time, okay. John Hersey is considered
Speaker 1: one of the earliest practitioners of the so called new journalism,
Speaker 1: in which storytelling techniques of fiction are adapted to non
Speaker 1: fiction stories. In nineteen ninety nine, Hiroshima, Hersey's account of
Speaker 1: the aftermath of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima was
Speaker 1: adjudged the finest work of American journalism in the twentieth century. Hmm,
Speaker 1: you don't say, Hey, what college did he go to? Oh?
Speaker 1: He went to Yale. Hm. I bet you he was
Speaker 1: skulling bones. He was born in China, the son of
Speaker 1: Grace Barrett and Roscoe Hersey. He was a missionary for
Speaker 1: the YMCA. He learned to speak Chinese before he spoke English.
Speaker 1: He was a novelist later in life. Right, he was rewarded.
Speaker 1: He is a descendant of William Hersey, one of the
Speaker 1: first settlers of Hingham, Massachusetts. But let's get to the
Speaker 1: croux of it all. Oh, it's right here in black
Speaker 1: and white. He studied at Yale University, where he was
Speaker 1: a member of this Skull in Bones Society, along with
Speaker 1: classmates Brendan Gill, who was also a journalist for The
Speaker 1: New Yorker, which means he was spreading lies, and Richard A. Moore,
Speaker 1: who just happened to be special counsel to Richard Nixon.
Speaker 1: So here's this guy. He's skull and bones, and he
Speaker 1: is the founder of new journalism, where you take a
Speaker 1: little bit of fiction and you put it into the
Speaker 1: story to soup it up. Right, makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 1: But the thing is he was chosen to go in
Speaker 1: and take the pictures right. During World War Two, newsweekly
Speaker 1: correspondent Hersey covered the fighting in Europe and Asia. He
Speaker 1: wrote about He wrote articles for Time and Life magazine.
Speaker 1: He accompanied Allied troops in their invasion of Sicily, of course,
Speaker 1: the embellised story. He survived four airplane crashes, on and
Speaker 1: on and on, And it turns out. One of the
Speaker 1: stories in Hersey's novel novel, Excuse Me, was inspired by
Speaker 1: the future John F. Kennedy, who also happened to be
Speaker 1: a former paramour of Hersey's wife, Francis Ann. Kennedy commanded
Speaker 1: a PT one oh nine that was cut in half
Speaker 1: by a Japanese destroyer. He led the rescue of his crew,
Speaker 1: personally towing the injured to safety. I mean the stories
Speaker 1: of this guy after the war, during the winner of
Speaker 1: forty five and forty six, Hersey was in Japan reporting
Speaker 1: for The New Yorker on the reconstruction of the devastated
Speaker 1: country when he found a document written by a Jesuit
Speaker 1: missionary who had survived the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The
Speaker 1: journalist visited the missionary, who introduced him to other survivors.
Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, I am telling you the official narrative
Speaker 1: of this guy. He just so happened to find a
Speaker 1: document written by a Jesuit missionary who just happened to
Speaker 1: survive the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and introduced him to
Speaker 1: other survivors. It's just look, if the story is too
Speaker 1: good to be true, then it's probably a story. And
Speaker 1: the opening book that he wrote. Of course, he wrote
Speaker 1: his book Kiroshima by John Hersey in nineteen forty six.
Speaker 1: Here's a little excerpt from it. At exactly fifteen minutes
Speaker 1: passed eight in the morning on August sixth, nineteen forty five,
Speaker 1: Japanese time, at the moment when the atomic bomb flashed
Speaker 1: above Hiroshima, Miss Toshiko Sasaki, a clerk in the personnel
Speaker 1: department of the East Asia Tin Works, had just sat
Speaker 1: down at her place in the planned office and was
Speaker 1: turning her head to speak to the girl at the desk.
Speaker 1: And again, this guy intermixed fiction with nonfiction. Soon afterward,
Speaker 1: John Hershey began discussions with William Shawn, an editor to
Speaker 1: The New Yorker, about a lengthy piece on the previous
Speaker 1: summer's bombing. Hersey proposed a story that would convey the
Speaker 1: cataclysmic narrative through the individuals who survived. In May nineteen
Speaker 1: forty six, Hersey traveled to Japan, where he spent three
Speaker 1: weeks doing research and interviewing survivors. He would return to
Speaker 1: America late in June and began writing the stories of
Speaker 1: six Hiroshima survivors, one of them a German Jesuit priest.
Speaker 1: His most notable work the thirty one thousand word article Hiroshima,
Speaker 1: which was published in the August thirty first, nineteen forty
Speaker 1: six issue of The New Yorker, and the story dealt
Speaker 1: with the atomic bomb dropped on that Japanese city on
Speaker 1: August sixth, nineteen forty five, the effects on the six survivors.
Speaker 1: The article occupied almost the entire issue of the magazine,
Speaker 1: something that The New Yorker had never done before. So again,
Speaker 1: the most powerful weapon that the powers that be have
Speaker 1: is deceit and deception and fear, whether it be the
Speaker 1: Challenger nine to eleven, right when they splashed these things
Speaker 1: across the television for you to see right, or back
Speaker 1: in the forties with Pearl Harbor being splashed across the
Speaker 1: front of the newspapers, the Gulf of Tonkin, all of
Speaker 1: these things. Nayir al Sabab Sabah, excuse me crying in
Speaker 1: front of a you know, the Senate committee, hearing how
Speaker 1: she witnessed the Iraqi soldiers throwing the babies on the
Speaker 1: ground from the incubators. The propaganda is real. You can
Speaker 1: look is just as recently as two days ago. Where
Speaker 1: and again this doesn't mean I'm a Maduro guy, and
Speaker 1: just pointing out Maduro and the guy who Cia hand
Speaker 1: picked to run for you know, Venezuelan government and their
Speaker 1: guy didn't win, and they're in the middle of trying
Speaker 1: their best to do what they did in Ukraine, this
Speaker 1: color revolution down there, the tear down statues and the
Speaker 1: same thing they do in country after country after country.
Speaker 1: If their guy is not getting in, they'll try to
Speaker 1: overthrow him. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But deceit
Speaker 1: is the name of their game. And to have a
Speaker 1: guy and you can That's what I'm saying. They tell
Speaker 1: you it's out in the open if you just read
Speaker 1: and look. You know, the guy that pushed the narrative
Speaker 1: of the atomic bombs was the guy who literally created
Speaker 1: new journalism, who was literally a skull and bones guy
Speaker 1: who was literally part of a secret society that deceives,
Speaker 1: lies and kills. So what about the Cuban missile crisis, right,
Speaker 1: if you go back and watch, you know, the big
Speaker 1: movie they made about that was that in the nineties,
Speaker 1: everybody was on the edge of their seat thinking it
Speaker 1: was the end of the end of civilization, right, it
Speaker 1: was what October nineteen sixty two, thirteen days. That might
Speaker 1: have been what the movie was called, come to think
Speaker 1: of it, right, and going back to the guy you
Speaker 1: know last week from Russia who was making fun of
Speaker 1: Americans for believing all these big news stories, worries about
Speaker 1: how these things happen, and they always make a movie
Speaker 1: about them, right to reinforce the narrative, But this was
Speaker 1: the thirteen day confrontation between our good friends during World
Speaker 1: War two, the Soviet Union, right when American diploma deployments
Speaker 1: pardon me, of nuclear missiles in Italy and Turkey were
Speaker 1: matched by the Soviet deployments of nuclear missiles in Cuba.
Speaker 1: And again, this lasted thirteen days, from the sixteenth to
Speaker 1: the twenty eighth of October nineteen sixty two, a mere
Speaker 1: thirteen months before the demise of JFK. And again, according
Speaker 1: to the official narrative, the confrontation is widely considered the
Speaker 1: closest the Cold War came to escalating into full scale
Speaker 1: nuclear war. And God bless them. I see the veterans,
Speaker 1: whether it's out and about at Walmart, cold War veteran,
Speaker 1: and that always tickled me. Not in no way shape
Speaker 1: or form, am I you know, poking fun? I just
Speaker 1: you know, it's just funny to me. But the confrontation again,
Speaker 1: the consider the closest you know, we ever came to
Speaker 1: nuclear annihilation. So in nineteen sixty one, the US government
Speaker 1: put Jupiter nuclear missiles in Italy and Turkey. It had trained,
Speaker 1: oh you tell me the CIA what. It had trained
Speaker 1: a paramilitary force of Cuban exiles, which the CIA led
Speaker 1: in attempting to invade Cuba to overthrowing its government. Starting
Speaker 1: in November of that year, the US government engaged in
Speaker 1: a violent campaign of terrorism sabotage in Cuba, known as
Speaker 1: the Cuban Project, which continued through the first half of
Speaker 1: the nineteen sixties. The Soviet administration was concerned about a
Speaker 1: Cuban drift towards China, which the Soviets had an increasingly
Speaker 1: fractious relationship. So you know, as the story goes, U
Speaker 1: two spyplane captured photographic evidence of these medium and long
Speaker 1: range missile facilities in Cuba. They came up with different resolutions.
Speaker 1: One of them was Operation Northwoods, right where they take
Speaker 1: down a false flag. We shoot down one of our planes,
Speaker 1: we say Cuba did it, and you know, all at war,
Speaker 1: we go down there and wipe out Cuba. I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure we did an episode on that maybe three years ago.
Speaker 1: So again, if you're new to the podcast, never heard
Speaker 1: of Operation Northwoods, that should tell you how great your
Speaker 1: government is. So again, the Cuban missile crisis. And look,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people who believed that THATTL. Castro
Speaker 1: was part of the CIA. Just you know, before you laugh,
Speaker 1: just remember Osama bin Laden. He was a CIA agent
Speaker 1: named Tim Osman. So I'm not sure we should automatically
Speaker 1: assure it. Henry macal did write an article about ten
Speaker 1: years ago talking about how communism is a total shit
Speaker 1: I am, and its role is to prevent genuine reform
Speaker 1: and impost tyranny in this feel good disguise. And while
Speaker 1: you know the title of the United States doesn't include
Speaker 1: the word communist or socialist in it, you can look
Speaker 1: at many of the factors of this country and what
Speaker 1: goes on in the overreach of the government. We certainly
Speaker 1: are not a one hundred percent free country, right. Henry
Speaker 1: said that the revolutionary Fidel Castro was nothing more than
Speaker 1: a banker shill tasked with removing him and reduce a
Speaker 1: Cuba to a penury and servitude. No different from any
Speaker 1: other US installed fast as dictator. See, I mean I
Speaker 1: could go on and on. Remember Saddam Hussein. We love
Speaker 1: that guy for a while until we were done with him. Right,
Speaker 1: think of Ukraine. Right, So we were providing all this
Speaker 1: arms to right, how does it go, My enemy is
Speaker 1: my friend's friend, or however that little expression go my
Speaker 1: enemies my friend's enemy? Maybe how that goes? So we were,
Speaker 1: you know, hooking up Iraq to take out Iran. But
Speaker 1: at the same time, you know, the Iran contra just
Speaker 1: none of it makes sense. It's so ridiculous. And you know,
Speaker 1: they create the boogeyman when it's convenient, whether it's just
Speaker 1: to feed the military intustrial complex, to you know, there's
Speaker 1: so many reasons why they do this to keep people
Speaker 1: in constant fear that the biggest one to me is
Speaker 1: to keep people in constant fear in order to justify
Speaker 1: the government's existence. That's really what it means. Right. But
Speaker 1: Henry would go on to say, Henry mcaw we're going
Speaker 1: to say that. In the nineteen fifties, Illuminati bankers David
Speaker 1: Rockefeller and Eugene Meyer organized a Cuban partnership called the
Speaker 1: Moa Bay mining company. Rockefeller hired the three Stooges of
Speaker 1: the Caribbean, namely Fidel Castro, E. Howard Hunt, and George H. W. Bush.
Speaker 1: Rockefeller City Bank provided the financial support that Fidel Castro
Speaker 1: needed for his ouster of Batista, and that Rockefeller had
Speaker 1: profited immensely from Castro's fictitious expropriation of the Moa Bay
Speaker 1: mining fields. And Castro received his training in the arts
Speaker 1: of economic terrorism and guerrilla warfare from US Army Special
Speaker 1: Forces Colonel Morgan of Ohio, and Rockefeller maintained actual physical control.
Speaker 1: Think about this. Rockefeller maintained the actual control of all
Speaker 1: of Castro's oil and mining operations, and in the interim
Speaker 1: he would collect extravagant profits from these endless pentagon bailouts
Speaker 1: by the US taxpayer. And Castro was very much a
Speaker 1: Mayer Rockefeller and dulles Cia Lackey with Zappada oil and
Speaker 1: we just talked about Zabada oil. George H. W. Bush
Speaker 1: as cover and he soon became Bush's favorite candyman. Castro
Speaker 1: was doubtless, no doubt he was pre briefed on the
Speaker 1: impending April nineteen sixty one invasion by a clutch of
Speaker 1: the clueless Miami Cubanos that we know who were led
Speaker 1: straight to slaughter in a perfect military gauntlet right a
Speaker 1: crossfire in long and narrow bay of water at the
Speaker 1: heel of a unique Caribbean land mass. It is a
Speaker 1: marine land drenched in oil, known as the Sapata. And again,
Speaker 1: I'm here to tell you, folks, if the CIA, the Rockefellers,
Speaker 1: the Rothschilds, if they want you dead and out of
Speaker 1: the game, they will have it done within twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: That's why the Trump story and all this other nonsense
Speaker 1: that goes on are just diversions and such. Was this
Speaker 1: and another reason to scare the masses, this Cuban missile crisis,
Speaker 1: which was a coincidence. You know, thirteen days that people
Speaker 1: on the edge glued to their TV in constant fear,
Speaker 1: looking at their children, looking at their grandchildren, wondering if
Speaker 1: this was it, if they would even see tomorrow. It
Speaker 1: is my belief that nuclear missiles are up there one
Speaker 1: of the top five psychological operations that they use against us. Now,
Speaker 1: what's interesting is HG. Wells and he wrote a book
Speaker 1: in nineteen fourteen entitled The World Set Free, and that
Speaker 1: was really the first time that introduced to man, where
Speaker 1: the possibility of this weapon so large and could cause
Speaker 1: such devastation. Right, came in the form of a book
Speaker 1: in nineteen fourteen, and I'll include these links where you
Speaker 1: can look at a portion of the book where right,
Speaker 1: the crowning triumph of military science, the ultimate explosive that
Speaker 1: was to give the decisive touch to war. These things
Speaker 1: are straight out of books, They're straight out of Hollywood.
Speaker 1: And again this was originally written in nineteen fourteen talking
Speaker 1: about how you know, these explosions would replicate like a
Speaker 1: volcano erupting in all of these things, And in thirty
Speaker 1: years it went from fiction to ooh, supposedly, you know
Speaker 1: it really happened. Well, if you take it, it's interesting
Speaker 1: if you take a deeper dive into the political views
Speaker 1: of H. G. Wells. Interesting guy, right. We know he
Speaker 1: was an author, He wrote novels, he wrote historical books.
Speaker 1: He was very much involved in politics and social commentary.
Speaker 1: But again we mentioned this when we did the podcast
Speaker 1: on the Fabian Society. He was a member of the
Speaker 1: Fabian Society that is a socialist organization. But of course
Speaker 1: they say, you know, down the road he broke with them.
Speaker 1: Because of his you know, creative imagination and blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: he said. He later grew staunchly critical of them as
Speaker 1: having a poor understanding of economics and educational reform. However,
Speaker 1: Comma he remained committed to socialist idea. He ran as
Speaker 1: a Labor Party candidate for London University in the twenties,
Speaker 1: on and on and on again. The social class was
Speaker 1: actually the theme in his book The Time Machine. Right,
Speaker 1: you know, this is just the guy, by the way,
Speaker 1: Fred Siegel. You know, we talk about the Manhattan Project.
Speaker 1: This guy was part of the Manhattan Institute. Well's unflattering
Speaker 1: take on American democracy Again. And the biggest thing with H. G.
Speaker 1: Wells was he was a champion of the world state.
Speaker 1: He did not believe that countries should exist. He believed
Speaker 1: that there should be a one world government. He stated
Speaker 1: in his autobiography from nineteen hundred onward, he considered a
Speaker 1: world state inevitable. And as I'm looking, I got sixteen
Speaker 1: windows open here, but one of them is just the
Speaker 1: destruction of Beirut and Israel and everything that's going on
Speaker 1: in the world. And we are, you know, the tinder
Speaker 1: box is igniting, and we're not very far away from
Speaker 1: you know, a third World WARLD would bring on the
Speaker 1: world state. Absolutely, and these people from Oxford University and
Speaker 1: all these people who have been pushing world state, they
Speaker 1: are foaming at the mouths for this to happen so
Speaker 1: they can get on with the dream. I do believe
Speaker 1: these group of people, the old time Rothschild's Rockefellers Gates,
Speaker 1: that they want to see the changing of the guard
Speaker 1: happen on their watch. They don't want their children or
Speaker 1: grandchildren that they want it to happen sooner than later.
Speaker 1: You know, when you stand back and look at the
Speaker 1: world today, whether it's the opening ceremony of the Olympics
Speaker 1: or when you listen to people talk on the television,
Speaker 1: just our society has just fallen off a cliff and
Speaker 1: they needed that to happen before they could get to this,
Speaker 1: you know, the final chapter, if you will, And let's
Speaker 1: continue to talk about the agenda of the psychological operations
Speaker 1: that are used against us. And I know people that
Speaker 1: are closer to my age already know where I'm headed
Speaker 1: with this, and it affected me. I don't even know
Speaker 1: if I slept that night. Maybe I did, maybe I didn't,
Speaker 1: But Let's go back in the Time machine. November twentieth,
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty three, and they dropped a movie on prime
Speaker 1: time entitled The Day After, and it aired on the
Speaker 1: ABC television network in primetime. The film postulates a fictional
Speaker 1: war between the NATO forces and the warsaw packed over
Speaker 1: Germany that rapidly escalates into a full scale nuclear exchange
Speaker 1: between the United States and the Soviet Union. Now the
Speaker 1: program focuses on the residence of Lawrence, Kansas. Which isn't
Speaker 1: that where they moved Plumb Island to that area, Lawrence, Kansas.
Speaker 1: That's interesting. I'll have to fact check myself at the
Speaker 1: end of the program, and several family farms near American
Speaker 1: missile silos. Steve Gutenberg was in this movie and John Lithgow.
Speaker 1: The film was written by Edward Hume. Now listen to this,
Speaker 1: and of course, this is the day after a nuclear war,
Speaker 1: right the nuclear winter. Listen to this. You know, we
Speaker 1: talk about where the world's how people freaked out? Seven
Speaker 1: million people called emergency services. More than one hundred million
Speaker 1: people in almost forty million households watched the film during
Speaker 1: its initial broadcast. Okay, it got a forty six rating.
Speaker 1: Means sixty two percent of everyone in the country watching
Speaker 1: television that night watch the movie The day after. The
Speaker 1: movie was the seventh highest rated non sports show to
Speaker 1: that date, and in two thousand and nine it set
Speaker 1: a record as the highest rated television film in United
Speaker 1: States history. And to make things even more interesting, a
Speaker 1: few years later, in nineteen eighty seven, the film was
Speaker 1: actually broadcast on Soviet television. During the negotiations of the
Speaker 1: Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, the producers demanded the Russian
Speaker 1: translation can form to the original script and not the broadcast.
Speaker 1: It's just funny, but again it's this propaganda where you know,
Speaker 1: this nuclear missile goes off, the superpowers fire nuclear ICBMs
Speaker 1: at each other. The film deliberately avoids specifying who shot
Speaker 1: the first missile. Uh the Soviets disable electronics and communications
Speaker 1: across the country with the e MP before striking American
Speaker 1: military bases, and then they hit the infrastructures and economic
Speaker 1: centers right in New York City, et cetera. Family they
Speaker 1: show families getting incinerated. It is then, of course, there's
Speaker 1: the fallout reports that they received by short wave radio.
Speaker 1: One of the actors dies of radiation poisoning. One of
Speaker 1: the nurses ends up dying of meningitis. It was you know,
Speaker 1: you know, this is a few years before The Challenger,
Speaker 1: but you want to talk about psychological operations. This just wasn't.
Speaker 1: This young producer said, I got this really cool script.
Speaker 1: We're going to put this together and make a film
Speaker 1: and release it, and it's going to be one of
Speaker 1: the most watched TV shows in history. Now, it was
Speaker 1: meant to be aired during a time during the Cold
Speaker 1: War when it was still you know, when I went
Speaker 1: to basic training in nineteen eighty seven, it was still
Speaker 1: about the commis right. I told you when we went
Speaker 1: to the Ranges, it was ivan the Kami we were
Speaker 1: shooting at that the targets, this is the Commies. And
Speaker 1: that propaganda freaked a lot of people out, and what
Speaker 1: it ended up doing was again even further ingraining the
Speaker 1: fact that there are weapons that can destroy the world.
Speaker 1: And again, I am giving you the evidence, and it's
Speaker 1: up to you whether you believe it or not. I
Speaker 1: am of the fact that I've been lied to so
Speaker 1: many times that I have a like, if you were
Speaker 1: to tell me right now percentage zero that there is
Speaker 1: no way nuclear weapons existed to one hundred percent. Yes,
Speaker 1: they absolutely exist. Honestly, gone to my head, I'm probably
Speaker 1: the ten to fifteen percentile right now. And again, if
Speaker 1: somebody introduces evidence to me that shows otherwise, I have
Speaker 1: to be able to mind it and look into it.
Speaker 1: You can't close your mind on subjects, right Otherwise you're
Speaker 1: not You've just given up your education, you quit researching.
Speaker 1: And that's not what we do here. But all these
Speaker 1: things that we've discussed over the last hour point to
Speaker 1: the fact that only a few people have high level
Speaker 1: involvements in these things, and much of it is propaganda. Right.
Speaker 1: Sure something was dropped out of those B twenty nine's
Speaker 1: on Hiroshima Nagasaki. Sure they probably had explosives already to
Speaker 1: go on the ground and napalm and fire bombing, and
Speaker 1: you know much of those cities were already ravaged through
Speaker 1: previous fire bombings. And again I encourage each of you
Speaker 1: to go to Google but Tokyo fire bombing March tenth,
Speaker 1: look at those photos and then compare them to the
Speaker 1: Nagasaki and Hiroshima photos. Now, what else benefits the military
Speaker 1: industrial complex? Why? Of course, it's the nuclear weapons spending.
Speaker 1: And this is from the Center for Arms Control and
Speaker 1: Non Proliferation dot COM. Over the next decade, the United
Speaker 1: States plans to spend five hundred billion dollars half a
Speaker 1: trillion dollar. By the way, officially, either yesterday or the
Speaker 1: day before, we went over already five trillion dollars in debt.
Speaker 1: But again, that's fifty billion dollars a year. According to
Speaker 1: the twenty nineteen Congressional Budget Office report. This is almost
Speaker 1: twenty five percent increased from the projected cost at the
Speaker 1: end of the Obama administration. So again that means Donnie
Speaker 1: took charge and increased the spending. And again, if you
Speaker 1: look at the next three decades, you're looking upwards of
Speaker 1: two to three trillion dollars a year. And if you
Speaker 1: look at the corporations who are in bed with the
Speaker 1: quote unquote nuclear weapons, the big ones are Boeing, which
Speaker 1: go all the way back to the B twenty nine
Speaker 1: is that drop the bombs, right, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, and
Speaker 1: Northrope Grumman. Those are the big four in nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: By the way, they are also the big four in NASA.
Speaker 1: So again, if you think NASA is a scam, I
Speaker 1: mean they're getting double the money, right, they're getting X.
Speaker 1: I forget what it was, fifty sixty seventy millions at
Speaker 1: dollars a day NASA does and you know, do the
Speaker 1: math for you know, nuclear missiles, the Big Four. It's
Speaker 1: a lot of money. So again, there are around ten
Speaker 1: countries who claim to have nuclear weapons, right, and that
Speaker 1: is actually part of the hoax that should raise the
Speaker 1: red flag, knowing that there's already kind of a world
Speaker 1: government in place. And again, all one has to do
Speaker 1: is go back to twenty twenty and look and see
Speaker 1: how all countries, whether friendly or not to the United States,
Speaker 1: fell in quote unquote lockstep and did the same thing.
Speaker 1: They all wore masks, they did the six feet, they
Speaker 1: did the vaccines. Right. So if you just say there's
Speaker 1: no way all these major world governments would collude, I
Speaker 1: don't know. One of the writers on the cow rabentein
Speaker 1: they go on to say that they never believed their
Speaker 1: entire life that nuclear weapons ever existed, and that Hiroshima
Speaker 1: and Nagasaki were only two more you know of these
Speaker 1: horrible you know, urban napon fire bombings, less devastating in
Speaker 1: fact than one that hit Tokyo five months earlier. And
Speaker 1: that's what we just have been talking about, but it
Speaker 1: was repackaged with this fake story of this new awesome
Speaker 1: weapon that could destroy the world. Right, And that is
Speaker 1: when you know, August sixth and ninth, nineteen forty five
Speaker 1: is certainly one of the big hoaxes in our history,
Speaker 1: helping the oligarchs steal trillions of dollars from the hapless taxpayers,
Speaker 1: who again, as long as it keeps us safe, you know,
Speaker 1: take our money. But again that the pictures, if you
Speaker 1: will say a thousand words, and if you just look,
Speaker 1: that is probably a result of ordinary you know, chemical explosions.
Speaker 1: You'll see the factories involved, and the old nuclear explosion
Speaker 1: photos and films were obviously fake when examined now versus
Speaker 1: when they were in the fifties and the forties. The
Speaker 1: Trinity and all that stuff. I always the Trinity right
Speaker 1: when they talk about the I always thought that was mockery.
Speaker 1: The code name Trinity, right, the code name for the
Speaker 1: first detonation of a nuclear weapon. And again when you
Speaker 1: look back at those old photos, it's like, what what
Speaker 1: happened to the camera? Nothing happened to the camera. It
Speaker 1: looked like they were blowing up, you know, a little
Speaker 1: set that they had staged, but that you know, that's
Speaker 1: just me. But again, the devastation you see in Hiroshima Nagasaki,
Speaker 1: where indeed tens of hundreds of thousands of people were
Speaker 1: killed and horrifically maimed, is exactly like Tokyo where any
Speaker 1: of the other Japanese firebomb cities, because back then the
Speaker 1: houses were mostly would and they burned. And already told
Speaker 1: you how you know, the combination of napalm and these bombs,
Speaker 1: you just couldn't put out the fires. You just couldn't
Speaker 1: put out the fires. Interestingly enough, one thing that I
Speaker 1: haven't mentioned yet. In nineteen ninety a medical study of
Speaker 1: Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors and their descendants found absolutely no
Speaker 1: noticeable genetic damage or cancer increases or what we would
Speaker 1: be led to expect from these devastated nuclear bombs and
Speaker 1: the radiations. Right and then illustrating how ridiculous nuclear weapons became,
Speaker 1: there was an early nineteen sixties video of the US
Speaker 1: President's brother, Robert Kennedy, viewing a nuclear blast while sitting
Speaker 1: a short distance down range in a folding chair. While
Speaker 1: watching the detonation of a small thirty kilogramm or so
Speaker 1: nuclear bomb, in an artillery shell entitled The weapon was
Speaker 1: called the Davy Crockett. Right, So if you look at
Speaker 1: the timeline, nineteen forty five USA has nukes, nineteen forty nine,
Speaker 1: Communist Russia has the bomb. Soviet e leaps they got
Speaker 1: the permanent rewards for playing along. Nineteen fifty two UK
Speaker 1: has the bomb. Right, the city of Laanen can't be
Speaker 1: second class. France gets it in six, China gets it
Speaker 1: in sixty four, and of course our good friends in
Speaker 1: Israel get them in sixty six. Right, they're ready to
Speaker 1: do the Samson option. India gets them in seventy four,
Speaker 1: known as the Smiling Buddha, South Africa, Pakistan, and you know,
Speaker 1: two thousand and six, crazy North Korea has the bomb, right,
Speaker 1: those crazy North Koreans. And as the New World Order looms,
Speaker 1: they have begun to wind down the hoax. Right, the
Speaker 1: United Nations already working to abolish all nuclear weapons. Right,
Speaker 1: the Pope will be in Jerusalem smiling with pride. How
Speaker 1: to eliminate something that never existed. It is a fear tactic.
Speaker 1: Seventy years of propaganda, and again this is another one
Speaker 1: of those big things to swallow. This has gained a
Speaker 1: lot of traction. So the Associated Press had to step
Speaker 1: in with its fact checking inn AP fact check right,
Speaker 1: these things came to be during the last election. I
Speaker 1: would say they came really prevalent, these fact checks. And
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons are real, contrary to conspiracy theories about archival
Speaker 1: text test footage. So the Associated Press had to step
Speaker 1: in and this young lady, oh my goodness, Melissa Golden,
Speaker 1: she looks like she came fresh out of the University
Speaker 1: of Portland claim nuclear weapons are fake because no camera
Speaker 1: could have survived the bless scene in archival test footage.
Speaker 1: The AP's assessment false camera setups used to capture nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons testing in the United States were especially designed to
Speaker 1: withstand intense effects from the bombs. For example, cameras were
Speaker 1: encased in stealing lead and positioned on towers rooted in
Speaker 1: the ground with concrete, as outlined in declassified military reports. Additionally,
Speaker 1: the existence of nuclear weapons this well documented, your big dummy,
Speaker 1: most famously by the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Speaker 1: Don't you guys learn anything in history class? Like how
Speaker 1: do you not know that that's like a house? She's talking?
Speaker 1: Oh man. A popular Instagram post included a clip of
Speaker 1: the July nineteenth episode of The Joe Rogan Experience featuring
Speaker 1: billionaire investor Mark Anderson, who outlined a conspiracy theory that
Speaker 1: the US faked nuclear weapons testing. And again, I believe
Speaker 1: it is one of your tactic. By the way, something
Speaker 1: I forgot to mention at the outset. I did try
Speaker 1: my best to watch Oppenheimer. I think I made it
Speaker 1: twelve minutes and I ejected. You know that Christopher Nolan
Speaker 1: guy is either dead on or he misses by a mile.
Speaker 1: Just like two handed bowlers, you either get a strike
Speaker 1: or you leave a two seven, eight ten, just brutal,
Speaker 1: so slow. I couldn't I apologize. I couldn't do it,
Speaker 1: couldn't do it. And I know he's a big part
Speaker 1: of it. Right. The Manhattan Project came down to Oakridge, Tennessee.
Speaker 1: None of them knew it, but the small town people
Speaker 1: of Scarborough community at Oakridge. Did you know that they
Speaker 1: were kicked out of their homes for an experiment that
Speaker 1: would change the course of human history. Their homes were
Speaker 1: about to become a key site of the Manhattan Project,
Speaker 1: the construction of the first atomic bomb. More specifically, the
Speaker 1: Oakridge site would create the enriched uranium used as fuel
Speaker 1: for the first atomic bombs. The work conducted at what
Speaker 1: would become the oak Ridge National Laboratory would lead some
Speaker 1: of the most incredible scientific breakthroughs of the twentieth century,
Speaker 1: including the construction of an atomic bomb that is capable
Speaker 1: of leveling the city of Hiroshima and killing around one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty thousand people, And it would be one
Speaker 1: of the most vital military secrets ever kept. Now one
Speaker 1: thing that happened in Oakridge could ever reach the ears
Speaker 1: of Germany or the Soviet Union. Less American risk the
Speaker 1: power of the atomic bomb slipping into the wrong hands.
Speaker 1: And it's funny if you actually go back and read
Speaker 1: some articles, it was not a secret whatsoever. Oakridge was
Speaker 1: the desired location for its isolation, which included some Native
Speaker 1: American families, housed about three thousand small town farmers that
Speaker 1: needed to be displaced. Again, stories of principles telling their kids, Hey,
Speaker 1: today is going to be the last day we see
Speaker 1: you because your family has been asked to move. People
Speaker 1: coming home from work finding eviction notices on your house.
Speaker 1: You have X amount of days to get out of here.
Speaker 1: Here's a check for your troubles. Ah. Yes, the American
Speaker 1: government always looking out for our best interest. And what
Speaker 1: would be probably the first time America screwed a Native
Speaker 1: American person out of their land. But the people forced
Speaker 1: out of their rural homes couldn't be given any word
Speaker 1: of explanation. Now, I pitched this to you, loyal listener.
Speaker 1: Maybe you work at the Amazon warehouse, and I know
Speaker 1: most of y'all pull ten hour shifts. You come home
Speaker 1: after a long day, you just want to have a
Speaker 1: cold drink, put your feet up and watch a little
Speaker 1: YouTube or whatever it is you do to unwind. You
Speaker 1: come home and there's a note on the door, and
Speaker 1: you see the sheriff driving around your going to door
Speaker 1: to door to door. You get to your door and
Speaker 1: there's a note from maybe it was the federal government,
Speaker 1: maybe it was from the county, from the government, the sheriff.
Speaker 1: I don't know how that worked, but just imagine coming
Speaker 1: home and there being a letter saying, hey, you know
Speaker 1: it is there's something very important going on and the
Speaker 1: United States government needs your property. You will be compensated,
Speaker 1: of course, of what they see fit, not what you
Speaker 1: see fit not. You know, let's say, in my case,
Speaker 1: all of the chicken coops I've built, and all the
Speaker 1: fencing I have built, and the greenhouse I have built,
Speaker 1: and the time and effort and labor into trimming trees
Speaker 1: and to enriching the ground, all of that. They don't
Speaker 1: look at the sacrifice that you have put into your land.
Speaker 1: They just look at it as a number and you
Speaker 1: get the number and you're given X amount of time
Speaker 1: to move. I mean that is quite a slap in
Speaker 1: the face. And to again to all the people when
Speaker 1: we have these conversations about the fifteen minute cities and
Speaker 1: you know, trying to get everybody you know, lassoed back
Speaker 1: in to actually look someone in the face and say
Speaker 1: that it would never happen when it has happened a
Speaker 1: nauseum over the decades, whether it's you got to move
Speaker 1: your farm because a new interstate's coming through, or Oakridge,
Speaker 1: what we desired this location because it's isolated. I mean,
Speaker 1: how would you deal with that? You know, some people
Speaker 1: were given two weeks. Some of these notes literally said
Speaker 1: that you have two weeks forthwith to vacate said premises
Speaker 1: immediately fourteen days. It would take me fourteen days to
Speaker 1: pack my aut Meanwhile, can you imagine as you're packing
Speaker 1: up your house and having to leave, watching tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of people the government brought into work into your town,
Speaker 1: the one you'd just been run out of, which at
Speaker 1: one time, at its peak, employed more than seventy five
Speaker 1: thousand people. And oh, by the way, those people, And
Speaker 1: when we talk about compartmentalization, how you say, oh, George,
Speaker 1: there's no way they would seventy five thousand people. Did
Speaker 1: you know that those seventy five thousand people brought into
Speaker 1: work there could never be told what they were doing.
Speaker 1: They were there to count beings, build parts, to do
Speaker 1: their part. They didn't know what the endgame was, right,
Speaker 1: And of course we're told that the brilliant scientist Robert
Speaker 1: Oppenheimer was the one in charge of the fifty nine
Speaker 1: thousand acres of land along the Black Oak Ridge that
Speaker 1: was chosen by General Leslie Groves as the site to
Speaker 1: construct a city in which to house the tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of workers and the four key facilities in the
Speaker 1: plant itself. And you know, I guess now's the time
Speaker 1: to talk about the brilliant mind of J. Robert Oppenheimer.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy just, oh, he knows everything. He
Speaker 1: was an American theoretical physicist who served as the director
Speaker 1: of the Manhattan Projects Lost Alamis Laboratory during World War Two.
Speaker 1: He is called the Father of the atomic bomb for
Speaker 1: his role in overseeing the development of the first nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: Born in New York City, he went to Harvard, got
Speaker 1: a doctorate in Germany by the way University of Godington
Speaker 1: in nineteen twenty seven, and he stuck under Max Bourne,
Speaker 1: who was this guy instrumental in quantum physics and solid
Speaker 1: state physics. And in fifty four, turns out he was
Speaker 1: awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his fundamental research in
Speaker 1: quantum physics, especially in statistical interpretation of wave function. And
Speaker 1: you know, that's all I'm going to get into him.
Speaker 1: But again, here's this guy Oppenheimer he was, And here's
Speaker 1: the things that stick out to me. Right. He also
Speaker 1: made major contributions to astrophysics, right, which is all, you know,
Speaker 1: the study of astronomy and the stars and the galaxies
Speaker 1: and the interstellar medium and all of this stuff. And
Speaker 1: then he also played a part in the theory of
Speaker 1: cosmic ray showers and black holes and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: And of course he is part of the Communist Party.
Speaker 1: He was ah which apparently, again according to the narrative,
Speaker 1: led to an A e. C. Security hearing, which led
Speaker 1: to the revocation of his security clearance. You know, and
Speaker 1: you really wonder what went on? What did he have
Speaker 1: a case of the the Apollo eleven guys, right, buzz Aldrin,
Speaker 1: Like you can see the few times he almost spilled
Speaker 1: his beans or was it just another diversion? Right, But
Speaker 1: here's a guy loved the Communist Party, part of the
Speaker 1: Second Red Scare, right, Just none of it adds up.
Speaker 1: I think he's grew up a Jewish guy, but said
Speaker 1: he didn't wasn't quote unquote religious. On and on and on.
Speaker 1: He died, His mother died in nineteen thirty one, his
Speaker 1: father died in nineteen thirty seven, leaving him close to
Speaker 1: four hundred thousand dollars, which is about eight and a
Speaker 1: half million dollars today, and again these stories. He claimed
Speaker 1: he didn't read newspapers or magazines, and he only learned
Speaker 1: of the Wall Street crash of nineteen twenty nine while
Speaker 1: he was on a walk with Ernest Lawrence, six months
Speaker 1: after the crash had occurred. You know, if you take
Speaker 1: the time to read this guy's background. It's silly. The
Speaker 1: FBI opened a file on him in March nineteen forty one.
Speaker 1: It recorded that he attended a meeting in nineteen forty
Speaker 1: at Chevalier's home that was also attended by the Communist
Speaker 1: Party's California secretary William Schneiderman and its treasurer Isaac Folkoff.
Speaker 1: The FBI noted that Oppenheimer was on the executive committee
Speaker 1: of the ac LU Red Flag, considered a Communist front organization,
Speaker 1: which the list of this day. Shortly thereafter, the FBI
Speaker 1: added Oppenheimer to its custodial Detention Index for a rest
Speaker 1: in case of national emergency. So this guy was an
Speaker 1: enemy of the people, was on the list, and then
Speaker 1: you know, three years later he was just a national
Speaker 1: hero for ending a war. Does that make any sense
Speaker 1: to you, ladies and gentlemen, or was he recruited by
Speaker 1: the government said we are going to toss you on
Speaker 1: in jail. But it's interesting. You got this, really, you
Speaker 1: got this scientific background. We're going to set up at
Speaker 1: this you know, this fake shell corporations. We're going to
Speaker 1: buy out the city of oak Ridge because there's nothing
Speaker 1: out there but a few people and who cares about
Speaker 1: those people. We're gonna give him a few thousand dollars
Speaker 1: to move out of the house, and the taxpayers are
Speaker 1: going to foot this bill, and Boeing and all these
Speaker 1: companies are going to make a bunch of money, and
Speaker 1: we're going to lie and say there was this huge explosion.
Speaker 1: Have you read this book by H. G. Wells. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have like saying was explosion like this and
Speaker 1: it's going to put all the people around the world
Speaker 1: in place and fear the new world order? Now do
Speaker 1: you want to go to jail or you want to
Speaker 1: be the figurehead for this That's what we thought, all right,
Speaker 1: mister Oppenheimer, await our instructions. So did it go precisely
Speaker 1: like that? Probably not. Did it go similarly to that,
Speaker 1: probably more than the official narrative. And again I hope
Speaker 1: you'll take this information research on your own. We will
Speaker 1: have a bunch of notes in the show notes, even
Speaker 1: things that we haven't talked about. But it's really important
Speaker 1: to ask the question, what if nuclear weapons don't exist
Speaker 1: and they are just another lie? Like for many people
Speaker 1: who believe the globes lie or insert lie the history
Speaker 1: of World War Two, all the lies that we've been told, right,
Speaker 1: even the lie of you know, the winner of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one that if you didn't get this vaccine you
Speaker 1: are going to die. So again, take this information, do
Speaker 1: some research. Is it an Illuminati hoax? Do they exist?
Speaker 1: Can't be afraid to ask these difficult questions because again,
Speaker 1: I think their endgame is a simulation of one similar
Speaker 1: to what we saw August fourth, twenty twenty in Beirut.
Speaker 1: And they're going to say, oh, it's a dirty bomb,
Speaker 1: and again not to say that one was stolen from
Speaker 1: a nuclear silo in the United States. And I think
Speaker 1: we're going to play that interview Friday night. I don't
Speaker 1: have time to load it up tomorrow. But we did
Speaker 1: interview a guy who a gentleman, and nothing he says
Speaker 1: in any way, shape or form, loose lips, sink ships,
Speaker 1: if you will. It's all public knowledge, everything we talk about.
Speaker 1: But he says, there's no way anyone could get to
Speaker 1: one of those things. But again, would they simulate one
Speaker 1: and say that, you know, whether it was Russian or whatever.
Speaker 1: Absolutely they could, and many people would believe it. And
Speaker 1: that's why in this day and age, with all the
Speaker 1: deception going on, with all the Satanic rituals in your
Speaker 1: face see the Olympic opening ceremony. One must be very
Speaker 1: very discerning when breaking down the narratives. Hey, I hope
Speaker 1: everyone has a great week. I appreciate you taking the
Speaker 1: time and hearing us out again. If you believe there's
Speaker 1: still a thing, that's absolutely your prerogative, We're just here
Speaker 1: to say I think it's worth considering that maybe, just
Speaker 1: maybe the government is lying to you. Thank you all
Speaker 1: for your continued support The fact Hunter dot com. Our
Speaker 1: email is the fact Hunter at mail dot com. God
Speaker 1: bless each and every single one of you. Keep your
Speaker 1: head on a swivel, and until we meet again, my friends,
Speaker 1: we will see you. You're listening to the fact Hunter
Speaker 1: Radio Network Just the Facts, Mammy,