Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. It's the clock
Speaker 1: strikes thirteen. It's Wednesday, the fifteenth of October. You're of
Speaker 1: our Lord, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Well, today we're going to talk about civil war. A
Speaker 2: lot of people are talking about civil war. And of
Speaker 2: course Ray Dalio is saying exactly the same thing I've
Speaker 2: been saying. So you go back and look at we
Speaker 2: go through these cycles. He doesn't call the fourth turning,
Speaker 2: So we go through these cycles. He said, this is
Speaker 2: looking like nineteen thirty, and in some ways it's looking
Speaker 2: like the eighteen fifties, the early sixties. So we'll take
Speaker 2: a look at that. We'll look at the further actions
Speaker 2: of Trump to get a Nobel prize. He just destroyed
Speaker 2: another boatload of people without any due process, murder on
Speaker 2: the high seas. That should get him the Nobel prize, right,
Speaker 2: and we'll take a look says we didn't talk about
Speaker 2: it yesterday. We'll take a look at the Gaza peace steal.
Speaker 2: Is there something to celebrate here? Will it hold for
Speaker 2: a week, for even a day, We'll be right back
Speaker 2: to stay with us. Well, lou Rockwell has an article
Speaker 2: that's been put up on a Free Thought project. Is
Speaker 2: Trump preparing for the next civil war or are we
Speaker 2: already fighting it now? He's not talking specifically the beginning
Speaker 2: about what's going on with the troops being placed in cities. Provocatively,
Speaker 2: He's pointing out, first of all that these wars that
Speaker 2: were involved in in Ukraine, for example, he said, that's
Speaker 2: a civil war. What's going on in Israel is something
Speaker 2: of a civil war, he said. We're fascinated by what
Speaker 2: we see on the screens, whether it's in Gaza, Ukraine,
Speaker 2: now Venezuela, even in the Pacific kit We must have
Speaker 2: been getting a snack when the plot twisted and the
Speaker 2: Peace in America first campaign morphed into Tomahawks and Kiev
Speaker 2: brutal US assisted genocide and Gaza in the US Navy
Speaker 2: blowing up fishermen and other civilians international waters at will
Speaker 2: without consequence. The current idiotic fiascos, NATO's Ukraine, Israel's expansionist
Speaker 2: murder spree have been curiously unwinnable, even more curiously unstoppable.
Speaker 2: Trump complained that he didn't understand how difficult it would
Speaker 2: be to end these wars. The vast majority of countries
Speaker 2: represented in the UN probably agree with Trump on this point.
Speaker 2: Why can't the stupidity and inhumanity just be stopped, ideally
Speaker 2: by the US government simply ceasing to send them money
Speaker 2: and bombs. That's the key thing. No, I sit there
Speaker 2: and wring your hands and out. I just don't know
Speaker 2: how to stop this when you're putting more lethal weapons
Speaker 2: in the hands of the Ukrainians. This is Trump. Only
Speaker 2: Trump can get away with this kind of nonsense, to
Speaker 2: say one thing and completely do the other. States are
Speaker 2: defined and measured by how they use the tools of
Speaker 2: war against all enemies, foreign end domestic. Israel, a state
Speaker 2: engaged in ever expanding civil war, is an excellent example.
Speaker 2: Landowners displaced and brutalized since nineteen forty eight, rebel against
Speaker 2: those who displaced them and then subjugated them. To prevail,
Speaker 2: Israel built a Western inspired military and intelligence apparatus, was
Speaker 2: Zionist wealth, was subterfuge, and relentless Western enthusiasm for euro
Speaker 2: colonialism's last gasp in the Middle East. Since twenty thirteen,
Speaker 2: Ukraine has experienced civil war. Yes, this is what we've
Speaker 2: been talked about. It got kicked off. The civil war
Speaker 2: in Ukraine got kicked off by the CIA, the Obama administration,
Speaker 2: and they have been at civil war for let's see,
Speaker 2: it was two thousand and twenty and twenty two was
Speaker 2: it that Russia invaded, So that point had been eight
Speaker 2: years of civil war and Kiev had been shelling civilians
Speaker 2: in the eastern part Ukraine for eight years. Ukraine and
Speaker 2: gods will both service testing grounds for newer weapons, technologies
Speaker 2: and tactics, as well as for broad based narrative control
Speaker 2: manipulation of emotion in terms of siphoning GDP away from
Speaker 2: citizens and into the global war industries without valid national
Speaker 2: security interests or democratically declared war. And that regard is
Speaker 2: very much like Vietnam when we look at it right.
Speaker 2: They want to keep it going because it's a testing
Speaker 2: ground for weapons, it's a testing ground for tactics. They
Speaker 2: don't care if they win anything. They want to keep
Speaker 2: it going as long as possible. They want to have
Speaker 2: a live fire testing ground. And they're just playing with people.
Speaker 2: And there's no declared war. There's no reason that we
Speaker 2: should be in that war except to make these people rich,
Speaker 2: to divert money to the military Industrial Complex Washington has
Speaker 2: been actively participating in these civil wars for a very
Speaker 2: long time, and now we're starting to move towards our
Speaker 2: own as well. Ice is ticketed to a Chicago man
Speaker 2: with legal residency, charged him one hundred and thirty dollars
Speaker 2: because he didn't have his papers on him. Your identity
Speaker 2: papers piece? Right? What does that sound like?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 2: What to call anybody? Nazis? That's been kind of worn out.
Speaker 2: But hey, if the shoe fits, the uniform fits, then
Speaker 2: wear it right. But look, this is a perfect story
Speaker 2: because I agree with the end that they're trying to
Speaker 2: accomplish here, and the end is that this guy doesn't
Speaker 2: have a job, he's living in government paid for housing,
Speaker 2: he has legal residency. How did that happen? And yet
Speaker 2: when you look at the process that is happening here,
Speaker 2: the way they're doing this is what mitigates really against
Speaker 2: not only this end, but it's going to hang us
Speaker 2: in the long run as well. Because when I first
Speaker 2: saw this, it's like, Okay, so he's he's here legally,
Speaker 2: but he doesn't have his paperwork, so they're going to
Speaker 2: hit him with one hundred and thirty dollars. Fine, So
Speaker 2: he said they asked if we have papers, and said,
Speaker 2: I don't have them on me. The agent said, stood
Speaker 2: him up. His name is Cruise, not Ted. Somebody else
Speaker 2: put him in the truck, drove him around in circles
Speaker 2: and asked him questions. Where was he born, what is
Speaker 2: his name? Who is his mother? Who is his father?
Speaker 2: I told them they're dead. The agent said they needed
Speaker 2: the information anyway, so they could look him up in
Speaker 2: their databases. Eventually, the agents verified that he is in
Speaker 2: fact legally in the country, and they let him go,
Speaker 2: but not before writing him a one hundred and thirty
Speaker 2: dollars ticket for not having his papers. Now are they
Speaker 2: going to do that to us? You know, where's your phone?
Speaker 2: I left it at home. You're supposed to have your
Speaker 2: phone on you at all times, and so let's go
Speaker 2: over here. Let's see if we can do some biometrics. So, okay,
Speaker 2: I identify who you are because I got you in
Speaker 2: the computer, but I'm still going to find you because
Speaker 2: you don't have your surveillance device on you. Right. So
Speaker 2: I have a real problem with that, A real problem
Speaker 2: with that. I have a problem with this guy as well.
Speaker 2: It doesn't mean that one justifies the other. However, so
Speaker 2: his friend, who was homeless, did not have legal status
Speaker 2: and was taken away by the Feds in Chicago Operation
Speaker 2: Midway Blitz. Agents have used broad federal authority when targeting
Speaker 2: suspected immigrants, say legal experts, I got to look at
Speaker 2: this and say, Okay, I don't know how many men
Speaker 2: they've got from Ice doing this, and they're working on
Speaker 2: two or three people. How long is it going to
Speaker 2: take them to get the millions that came in with
Speaker 2: the open borders during just Trump and Biden and it
Speaker 2: goes They're I think going to make a dent in
Speaker 2: it in terms of Trump's term. That's here at that rate,
Speaker 2: America has never been a place where people need to
Speaker 2: show one's papers, exactly right. That's the ACLU talking ticketing
Speaker 2: a lawful permanent resident, forcing him to appear in court
Speaker 2: and pay a fine for not carrying their identity papers
Speaker 2: is unnecessary and cruel. No, it's authoritarian. It does not
Speaker 2: make our community stronger or more safe. It's simply part
Speaker 2: of the Trump administration's attempt to make life uncomfortable for
Speaker 2: all immigrants. They said, well, I think that dangerous precedents
Speaker 2: are being established for all of us I view this
Speaker 2: the same way I view the mandatory everify or the
Speaker 2: real ID to have to fly, and they're ramping that
Speaker 2: up now as well. Every country is doing that. So
Speaker 2: if you want to if you're an American, you want
Speaker 2: to go to Europe, you're going to have to be
Speaker 2: fingerprinted now in order to get into Europe. I'm disgusted
Speaker 2: with this police surveillance state that's being created globally. That's
Speaker 2: always been the plan. Not surprised by it. I'm disgusted
Speaker 2: by it. And I'm disgusted because we known about this
Speaker 2: for a long time and people are not focused on this.
Speaker 2: They're focused on everything else. A spokeswoman for ICE did
Speaker 2: not return messages when seeking comments, so the spokeswoman had
Speaker 2: nothing to speak about. I don't care. We're going to
Speaker 2: ticket people if you don't have your identity papers please.
Speaker 2: So a former dishwasher, Cruz, lives in government funded apartment
Speaker 2: but isn't working due to his health. You know, when
Speaker 2: I was a kid, that was a job for high
Speaker 2: school kids. Now high school kids don't have jobs dishwasher.
Speaker 2: So he's living in government funded apartment and he's not working.
Speaker 2: Cruse said he was relieved to be released, but he
Speaker 2: worries how he's going to pay the fine. It's not fair.
Speaker 2: I said, let's go to my house and I'll show
Speaker 2: you my papers. I'm a resident. The problem is he
Speaker 2: doesn't have a house. He's got a government supplied apartment
Speaker 2: at your spence, the taxpayer's expense. This is why I've
Speaker 2: said the fundamental problem is a welfare magnet. Fix that
Speaker 2: instead of your police state tactics that are out there.
Speaker 2: It's just so obvious that they don't want to fix
Speaker 2: the core problem. They'd rather create another problem, a problem
Speaker 2: that will be a problem for each and every one
Speaker 2: of us. They want to force the real ID on us.
Speaker 2: They want to force the everify on us, make us
Speaker 2: carry our identity papers or our identity device with us
Speaker 2: at all times so they can use geofencing to track us,
Speaker 2: not just biometric identification. That's the real problem, folks. Yes,
Speaker 2: the immigration stuff is a problem. And in this guy's case,
Speaker 2: what do you think he would do if he didn't
Speaker 2: have a government department. I mean he might live on
Speaker 2: the streets or something, or he might go home where
Speaker 2: things are cheaper and more affordable, or he could build
Speaker 2: a home there. Well, Ray Dalio has something to say
Speaker 2: about the fact that we are in multiple wars. He
Speaker 2: warns that we're in a civil war, and he warns
Speaker 2: that we have soaring debt, and he says, the US
Speaker 2: is not the only country in this situation.
Speaker 4: Okay, there is a financial money where, there's a technology war,
Speaker 4: there's geopolitical wars, and there are more military wars. And
Speaker 4: so we have a civil war of some sort which
Speaker 4: is developing in the United States and elsewhere where. There
Speaker 4: are irreconcilable differences.
Speaker 2: So how do you see it being settled? Actually, where
Speaker 2: do you see the US going?
Speaker 1: Does it get settled?
Speaker 4: Well, either we will rise above it and realize that
Speaker 4: our common good is going to necessitate us dealing with it,
Speaker 4: so that what works for most people who's going to work.
Speaker 4: I think that's a little bit idealistic. I have to
Speaker 4: be a practical person, and I would say that I
Speaker 4: think that these conflicts will become tests of power by
Speaker 4: each side.
Speaker 2: Well, I agree absolutely. Did you hear the phrase that
Speaker 2: he used, irreconcilable differences? I think a movie about that
Speaker 2: about divorce, called irreconcilable differences. That's usually the key phrase
Speaker 2: that you use in a divorce you know, you don't
Speaker 2: want to get into the details. Well, the details are complicated.
Speaker 2: Let's just say we have irreconcilable differences. Let's just say
Speaker 2: that we have irreconcilible differences. And Marjorie Taylergreen is right,
Speaker 2: we need to have a national divorce. We need to
Speaker 2: be able to go our own way, except that we
Speaker 2: have people in Washington who will use this, as he
Speaker 2: points out, as a test of power. They're not going
Speaker 2: to let that happen. We have an abusive husband. Heredalio
Speaker 2: said something bad is coming at some point. And again
Speaker 2: this is the guy who is he Well, he founded
Speaker 2: a hedgehund called Bridgewater, and he's a multi billionaire. So
Speaker 2: if I were rich men, people wouldn't really know what
Speaker 2: I'm talking about. But in this case, I think Ray
Speaker 2: Dalio does know what he's talking about. And I think
Speaker 2: he says, I'm a student of history and these things
Speaker 2: come in cycles. He said, we have the brutal Ai
Speaker 2: War that's coming between the US and China. The UK
Speaker 2: is in a debt death spiral, among other things. He's
Speaker 2: now warning that the US may be entering a new
Speaker 2: kind of civil war amid rising inequality and debt, as
Speaker 2: well as a breakdown in the global geopolitical worder. In
Speaker 2: an interview with Bloomberg TV which aired this week, he
Speaker 2: said the forces which shaped the world quote unquote, we're
Speaker 2: all now being disrupted, and that America served as a
Speaker 2: prime example of this. We're in wars, as you heard
Speaker 2: him say, financial war, money war. There's a technology war,
Speaker 2: there's geopolitical wars, there's military wars, and so we have
Speaker 2: a civil war of some sort which is developing the
Speaker 2: US and elsewhere where. There are irreconcilable differences. Had this
Speaker 2: year issued several warnings about the risks posed by America's
Speaker 2: rising national debt, which currently stands at a staggering nearly
Speaker 2: thirty eight trillion. Additionally, the billionaire also highlights the country's
Speaker 2: debt to income ratio of roughly one hundred and twenty percent.
Speaker 2: It's potentially leading to a situation in which repayments sap
Speaker 2: government finances and trigger a death spiral for the economy.
Speaker 2: He said, the US government debt is rising too quickly,
Speaker 2: fueling a climate that's very much analogous to the years
Speaker 2: before World War two. Yeah, global warming, when the bombs
Speaker 2: start dropping, fueling a climate we have a financial climate
Speaker 2: change that is hitting us earlier. That's the other climate
Speaker 2: change is not real. But this is this is very
Speaker 2: real and looking very much like World War two, the
Speaker 2: last fourth turning.
Speaker 5: Of course we covered months ago. But the way they
Speaker 5: calculate the US debts a little bit screwy. So it's
Speaker 5: actually closer to one hundred and fifty trillion dollars.
Speaker 2: Though, Yeah, in the books. Yeah, every every government stat
Speaker 2: they give you is a lie, whether they're talking about
Speaker 2: the debt, the inflation rate, or the employment rate or COVID.
Speaker 5: Or anytime you the government if they want you to
Speaker 5: if they want it to be big, assume it's small.
Speaker 5: If they wanted to be small, assume it's much larger
Speaker 5: than they're giving you.
Speaker 2: That's right. You know, these these bureaucracies are just rigged anyway.
Speaker 2: He said, when debt rises relative to income, it's like
Speaker 2: plaque in the arteries then begins to squeeze out the spending.
Speaker 2: And he'd used this analogy before when he said we're
Speaker 2: going about to have a heart attack. Well, certainly the
Speaker 2: financial pressure, I guess is nobigous to blood pressures. Mind.
Speaker 2: Politicians up both sides of the aisle and he has
Speaker 2: called for a mix of tax revenue increases and spending
Speaker 2: cuts to tackle what he calls the deficit debt bomb.
Speaker 2: Maybe we just followed the constitution, I'd get rid of
Speaker 2: almost all the federalment right away. But I thought that's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting. You know that phrase we hear all
Speaker 2: the time, both sides of the aisle. What is that? Well,
Speaker 2: he got one side that says I'll do this, and
Speaker 2: the other side says I'll do this, and I'll do that,
Speaker 2: and neither one of them do the right thing. They're
Speaker 2: always i'll do this, I'll do that. Yeah, both sides
Speaker 2: of the aisle. Well, on top of the debt, he
Speaker 2: assigned the alarm over Trump's tariffs, warning about the shifting policy. Again,
Speaker 2: it's not even the level of taxation. He's saying, you know,
Speaker 2: we need to read some raise taxes and cut spending. Right,
Speaker 2: So it's not about raising taxes, which is what tariffs
Speaker 2: are really about, raising taxes on you and me. But
Speaker 2: it's about the shifting policy, the constantly shifting policy. And
Speaker 2: of course, even as he's doing this interview, Trump goes
Speaker 2: back to one hundred percent tariffs on China. So it's
Speaker 2: that chaos, that engineered chaos that Trump represents. He said,
Speaker 2: it's part of the economic and geopolitical pressures that could
Speaker 2: trigger a crisis that would be, in his terms, worse
Speaker 2: than a recession, worse than what would that be, That
Speaker 2: would be a depression with it. I think that right
Speaker 2: now we're at a decision making point and we're very
Speaker 2: close to recession, and I'm worried about something worse than
Speaker 2: a recession. If this isn't handled well, you think Trump
Speaker 2: will handle it, Well, That's what I'm worried about. We
Speaker 2: have a breaking down of the monetary order, and we're
Speaker 2: going to change the monetary order because we can't spend
Speaker 2: these amounts of money. We're having profound changes in our
Speaker 2: domestic order, how ruling is existing, and we're having profound
Speaker 2: changes in the world order. Such times are very much
Speaker 2: like the nineteen thirties, he said, yeah, prelude to World
Speaker 2: War I studied history. He said this repeats over and
Speaker 2: over again. Asked about the worst case scenario, DOLLI will
Speaker 2: point into a potential breakdown of the dollar's role as
Speaker 2: a store of wealth, combined with internal conflict between the
Speaker 2: norms of democratic politics and escalating international tensions, potentially even
Speaker 2: military conflict. These breakdowns have occurred before the existing monetary
Speaker 2: and geopolitical order began in nineteen forty five. These systems
Speaker 2: go in cycles, and I worry about the breakdown, particularly
Speaker 2: because it doesn't have to happen. Well, it doesn't have
Speaker 2: to happen, but it's happened over and over again, and
Speaker 2: the timing is right, and it is. As we can see,
Speaker 2: it's not just a bad leader at the top. There
Speaker 2: are bad people who are supporting what the bad actions
Speaker 2: that this guy is doing. As I point out, the
Speaker 2: people who are cheering the memes that were probably put
Speaker 2: together by trump bots, trump pr flax showing police brutality,
Speaker 2: and the people a sharing it say I voted for this, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you voted for civil war, didn't you. You want it
Speaker 2: as badly as the left, the mirror images of each other.
Speaker 2: And so he says it's going to be severe. I
Speaker 2: think it could be more severe than those if these
Speaker 2: matters simultaneously occur. That's right, everything all at once. Well.
Speaker 2: Haig Seth has put stringent rules on the Pentagon Press
Speaker 2: Corps and the large mainstream media companies are saying goodbye,
Speaker 2: We're not going to sign this thing, and he's saying, well,
Speaker 2: if you don't do it, then you're not going to
Speaker 2: be coming in here and talking to us. I just
Speaker 2: got to say. And when we talked yesterday to Anthony Frida,
Speaker 2: he said that he had started in the advertising agency
Speaker 2: and he went to work for the people did the
Speaker 2: Joe Camel campaign. He's had one of that until there
Speaker 2: was the determination that it was targeting kids. And he said,
Speaker 2: I didn't want to become an artist so I could
Speaker 2: self cigarettes to kids. So I'm getting out of that.
Speaker 2: I'm going to go to the New York Times. Because
Speaker 2: he's had that point in time he thought, well, these
Speaker 2: are people doing good work. They're telling people what's going on.
Speaker 2: And then he goes to New York Times and they say, well,
Speaker 2: we got to get the cartoons and the op ed
Speaker 2: pieces vetted by the government, vetted by the Pentagon, and
Speaker 2: he goes, oh, wait a minute. I didn't didn't become
Speaker 2: an artist to sell wars either. It's even worse. And
Speaker 2: so when you look at this history, and we all
Speaker 2: know that this has been going on for quite some time,
Speaker 2: New York Times and all these mainstream media organizations, Washington
Speaker 2: Posts and so forth that are having such a fit
Speaker 2: about hexsess rules, and again he's ramping it up, and
Speaker 2: he's doing it in public and in their face. But
Speaker 2: the reality is that these people have been complicit behind
Speaker 2: the scenes for the longest amount of time. Look, if
Speaker 2: you've got a credentialed press, you don't have a free press.
Speaker 2: These people are not free to say whatever they want.
Speaker 2: They will toe the line. They will get on one
Speaker 2: side that I'll do this or I'll do that or
Speaker 2: the other. Right, they get on one side of the
Speaker 2: aisle or the other. And we've seen this for the
Speaker 2: longest time. You have some of these organizations get their
Speaker 2: access by sucking up to the left, most of them.
Speaker 2: Some of them get access by sucking up to the
Speaker 2: right and to Trump. But that's the whole thing. Right,
Speaker 2: people will watch me because I've got an interview with
Speaker 2: this republicanun or this Democrat or whatever, and that's what
Speaker 2: they want to maintain. They will have that access cut
Speaker 2: off if they push against it. So in a sense,
Speaker 2: I see this as a positive development. If you're going
Speaker 2: to have an open fight about this, and they're going
Speaker 2: to have to openly embarrass themselves by signing a pledge
Speaker 2: that they will do what the Pentagon says instead of
Speaker 2: pretending that they're independent. And now it's out there for
Speaker 2: everybody to see, and they've got to back away from this,
Speaker 2: and then there's consequences for it. Make them mad. You
Speaker 2: might actually get some real reporting. I'm not that optimistic,
Speaker 2: but it's a positive development. I think a growing list
Speaker 2: of news organizations with access to the Pentagon briefings have
Speaker 2: formally rejected a new Defense Department or Department of War
Speaker 2: policy that would require journalists to sign a pledge promising
Speaker 2: not to seek unauthorized materials and limiting their access to
Speaker 2: certain areas well. The reality is is that the way
Speaker 2: this is put in by zero Hedge says unauthorized materials.
Speaker 2: So you think, well, certainly they shouldn't have any access
Speaker 2: to classified information because you know, the security state is
Speaker 2: how they have ruled us since nineteen forty five, and
Speaker 2: everything is a national security secret if they don't want
Speaker 2: you to see it. I mean, I've even seen this
Speaker 2: at local government level. Everybody acts as if they are
Speaker 2: the Pentagon or the CIA. I can't talk about you know, well,
Speaker 2: the the reality is is that they're talking about things
Speaker 2: that are not classified, and what he wants to say
Speaker 2: is that you will only look at what we hand
Speaker 2: delivered to you that we want you to see. It
Speaker 2: doesn't even have to be They don't have to go
Speaker 2: through the procedure of pretending that it is pertaining to
Speaker 2: national security. They don't have to do that. Just have
Speaker 2: to say everything is prohibited for you unless I hand
Speaker 2: you the folder. You know, because those papers are evidently
Speaker 2: on Pambondi's desk or on Pete Heggsath's desk. You know
Speaker 2: I've got the answer to that. I'll give it to
Speaker 2: you later. It's setting on my desk and I'll give
Speaker 2: you the answer. Now, there's many wonders. Now they're full
Speaker 2: on very public revolt against the policy introduced last month
Speaker 2: by Hegseth, who has himself been thrust into the center
Speaker 2: of controversy since being named Pentagon chief due to the
Speaker 2: embarrassing Yemen Group Chati episode earlier in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Others have been told to sign the pledge by Tuesday
Speaker 2: at five pm this last night, or surrender their press
Speaker 2: credentials within twenty four hours. After weeks ago the new
Speaker 2: policy was introduced, Wells had a credential press it's not
Speaker 2: a free press. I was never interested in being a
Speaker 2: part of the White House Press Corps, not that I
Speaker 2: was invited either, But he had a drum corsi. He
Speaker 2: got credentials for info Wars and you know, so he
Speaker 2: could go there and ask a question and be seen.
Speaker 2: It's like, you don't need that. You can get the
Speaker 2: information that is out there in the very fact that
Speaker 2: they're going to require credentials for you. That's the newsworthy issue.
Speaker 2: So you don't have to have that visibility. Except it's
Speaker 2: just part of playing that game.
Speaker 5: Oh boy, I could go sit in the room and
Speaker 5: get lied to directly.
Speaker 2: Well, I wouldn't be sitting in that room after the
Speaker 2: first time I was asked questions. Establishment media outlets have
Speaker 2: also been frustrated after long accredited media outlets were forced
Speaker 2: to vacate their assigned Pentagon workspaces under what officials described
Speaker 2: as quote an annual media rotation program where independent media, podcasters,
Speaker 2: and non traditional media figures have been given access and
Speaker 2: sometimes even priority. This is the influencers, right, These are
Speaker 2: not journalists, they're not reporters, they're influencers. But of course
Speaker 2: I would say the same thing about the New York
Speaker 2: Times and The Washington Post. They are also influencers. They're
Speaker 2: just pretending that there's something else. These other people, at
Speaker 2: least they're honest and saying, I'm an influencer, I'm a propagandist.
Speaker 2: Those who have made clear they're not signing the policy
Speaker 2: are The Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, The Atlantic, Politico,
Speaker 2: The Hill, The Guardian, Reuters, Associated Press, n PR. They
Speaker 2: still have any reporters left. I thought we got rid
Speaker 2: of the wish. We had Huffington Post, Breaking Defense and others. Interestingly,
Speaker 2: there is only let's say Newsmax is made it clear
Speaker 2: that it is not signing as well. That's kind of interesting.
Speaker 2: But I think the most interesting thing is that One
Speaker 2: America News is the only organization that has signed this.
Speaker 2: Out of all the ones that were in Washington, only
Speaker 2: One American News has signed this, and everybody else has
Speaker 2: said no to do it. That's that's amazing. Uh So
Speaker 2: they're gonna get the Pentagon feed and they'll they'll take it,
Speaker 2: and you're gonna have I guess Pentagon Pete's going to
Speaker 2: be there. There'll be one reporter. Let's see, Oh yes, you.
Speaker 6: Really will be the One American News the.
Speaker 2: One American news organization to one and only, Yeah, and
Speaker 2: the one American news reporter right there, these is a.
Speaker 5: Bit hard to dodge questions at that point.
Speaker 2: Huh yeah, yeah. Now let's go to somebody you again
Speaker 2: the question. Yet, these mainstream media gate keepers would have
Speaker 2: more of a leg to stand on if they hadn't
Speaker 2: already long ago proven themselves to be by and large
Speaker 2: mere pro war stenographers of official government narratives time and again.
Speaker 2: This is what I was saying the Mockingbird people, and
Speaker 2: that's what Anthony Frieda saw when he was at the
Speaker 2: New York Times as well, long time ago. The media
Speaker 2: loves to fawn over military commanders and anonymous sources which
Speaker 2: they already agree with, from hawkish pro Israel or pro
Speaker 2: Ukraine stances to regime change operations abroad in places like
Speaker 2: Syria or Libya. That's when criticism from the press goes
Speaker 2: out the window. Perhaps the press will finally grow more
Speaker 2: critical of whatever anonymous military and or intelligence officials tell
Speaker 2: them now that there's an adversary of Theirs in the Pentagon,
Speaker 2: So we'll see what happens. Don't trust anybody, use your
Speaker 2: own critical thinking seriously. So let's cover the comments before.
Speaker 5: That's right, Addie, m R R. Israel already fired weapons
Speaker 5: on Palestinians trying to return home. Oh, who could have
Speaker 5: foreseen that. They're normally so good about keeping their ends
Speaker 5: of the bargain.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going to talk about that. It's one of
Speaker 2: the reasons I said the top of the program that
Speaker 2: I did not cover this before because I didn't think
Speaker 2: it lasts. Yeah, and it didn't even last to day.
Speaker 5: We'll give it twenty four hours then we'll talk of
Speaker 5: it now. Yeah, it didn't last. So ox O's reminds
Speaker 5: me of the English troops of using Americans before the
Speaker 5: Revolutionary War.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: That's why they want you chipped. They'll know everything about you,
Speaker 5: they'll know where you are the real Octo Spook. He
Speaker 5: has no American rights. They're well within using our powers
Speaker 5: to support him. What is up with the fine games.
Speaker 2: No, he does have rights. He's a human being. And
Speaker 2: it doesn't say citizens in the Constitution says persons. People.
Speaker 2: People have rights because we're creating the image of God.
Speaker 2: That's what this country's founded on. I don't get rights
Speaker 2: and privileges from the Constitution. I don't get my rights
Speaker 2: from the constitution or the government. Those are privileges if
Speaker 2: you get them. Now, we have to say that our
Speaker 2: government respects human beings in America. Our government will not
Speaker 2: do criminal things to people. And I don't care if
Speaker 2: they're here illegally. I don't care if they're a murderer.
Speaker 2: You follow due process and then kill them. You don't
Speaker 2: go out with a lynch mob, and you don't shoot
Speaker 2: people in boats without even knowing who they are. I
Speaker 2: will never accept that that is the wrong way to
Speaker 2: approach all of this. Yes, our rights come from God
Speaker 2: and they're based on us being human beings, not American citizens,
Speaker 2: and we do not want to turn our government into
Speaker 2: the kind of monster that we've seen it become, and
Speaker 2: we've seen this in other countries as well. You have
Speaker 2: to allow due process and legal protection and respect for
Speaker 2: human beings. End of story. There's other ways to get
Speaker 2: these people out of the country. They don't need to
Speaker 2: be giving him a free apartment at our expense. Just
Speaker 2: stop that and you can do some other thing. Deport him,
Speaker 2: that's fine, whatever, you know, take away his legal status
Speaker 2: if he can't support himself, and then deport him. I
Speaker 2: don't have a problem with that. Just do it legally.
Speaker 2: You know. I don't have a problem with the death penalty.
Speaker 2: I have a problem with our court system. And so
Speaker 2: we have to make sure that we're following the rules,
Speaker 2: that our government is not allowed to do anything that
Speaker 2: it wishes on a whim. And that is something that
Speaker 2: I've seen under the Trump administration that is worse than
Speaker 2: anything else I've seen in my life in America, this
Speaker 2: idea of government by whim. And so I guess, have
Speaker 2: you had enough women yet? Not winning, but women, just
Speaker 2: one whim after the other.
Speaker 6: Also, the man was here legally. He wasn't a citizen,
Speaker 6: but he was a legal resident.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's a problem. We need to fix that.
Speaker 2: If he doesn't have any means of support, if he
Speaker 2: doesn't have any skills, if he's not working, he shouldn't
Speaker 2: be in legal status. Other countries do that. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know what, you want to become a citizen in
Speaker 2: New Zealand, You've got to have millions of dollars to
Speaker 2: get residents there. I know because I tried once. But
Speaker 2: you know you can't do that. You can't survive as
Speaker 2: a country if people can come in and live off
Speaker 2: of you. And that's the fundamental issue that they want address. R.
Speaker 2: Your microphone's off, Audi m r R.
Speaker 5: Well, thank you very much. That is very generous. I
Speaker 5: believe that says thank you for your prayers. My director
Speaker 5: of operations, gig is safe. My podcast Everything is a
Speaker 5: Lie Damn It is off the ground and Jason Barker
Speaker 5: and The Tiger my first guests. So go check out
Speaker 5: Audi mrr's new podcast, Everything is a Lie damn It.
Speaker 5: And that's all one word to go check them out
Speaker 5: there on Rumble.
Speaker 2: That's uh, that's that's true. That's true. I'm glad to
Speaker 2: hear that worked out. Thank you for letting us know Outie,
Speaker 2: very happy for you.
Speaker 5: Praise goot and he also says we have the Fourth
Speaker 5: Amendment for a reason.
Speaker 2: Yes, I have the Fifth Amendment due process and things
Speaker 2: like that. Yeah, it's very very important.
Speaker 5: Little Forward school House says, I live in southern Illinois.
Speaker 5: They're setting up a website where we can sign up
Speaker 5: to house immigrants and get benefits for it. Well, I'm
Speaker 5: sure that won't end with somebody getting beheaded in their
Speaker 5: own vet. The real Octo spook enticing citizens to become criminals,
Speaker 5: housing Forward invading criminals. Nice. Yeah, that's the problem. The
Speaker 5: welfare magnet drags in a lot of the worst people.
Speaker 5: People you can't trust Audi MRR. They don't want to
Speaker 5: fix the core problem because they created the core problem.
Speaker 2: That's right. I mean they even wrote papers about it.
Speaker 2: This is how we're going to bring down the US
Speaker 2: with a welfare system. We bring in everybody from abroad
Speaker 2: and put them on the welfare system. They'll take it down.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, Zoxa Voxhaw's useless eaters won't be able to
Speaker 5: opt out of the brain chips.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: If you want your privileges to keep on going, if
Speaker 5: you want your welfare, you're going to take the brain chip.
Speaker 5: Audi mr R. They are really engine hearing that civil
Speaker 5: war narrative, aren't they. It won't happen, so they'll do
Speaker 5: a false flag fran Scene can't remember what it was.
Speaker 5: But the smart acronym in smart cities is not good news.
Speaker 2: Probably not self monitoring and reporting technology technology.
Speaker 5: Yeah, nanny state NIBARU twenty twenty nine recession depression. There's
Speaker 5: yet to be a term for what Emperor Trump will
Speaker 5: cast upon Marx America. The closest would be total implosion.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: We're passing the event horizon, do not obey. Still, today
Speaker 5: I'm surrounded by others with zero understanding, a realization of
Speaker 5: the soon to be digital IDs slash currency slash social
Speaker 5: credit ranking system. Amazing, How ignorance ain't got time to research?
Speaker 2: Well. I can give them a link to David Night
Speaker 2: News if I can get them through a few minutes
Speaker 2: without offending them.
Speaker 5: That's right. There's three hours a day, every weekday they
Speaker 5: can get They don't have to do any reading at all,
Speaker 5: Wally waalris.
Speaker 2: I'll do the reading for you exactly, but you did
Speaker 2: the thinking for yourself, yeah, Wally.
Speaker 5: While arrest, these ice agents are out of control. In Portland,
Speaker 5: they delayed an EMS for twenty minutes and threatened the driver.
Speaker 2: That's nuts. I don't like. I had to test their tactics.
Speaker 2: I had to test the fact that they're you know,
Speaker 2: we've got videos all over social media. I mean I
Speaker 2: could fill up the board with these videos of people
Speaker 2: in civilian clothes, not showing a badge, not showing any identification,
Speaker 2: not having a uniform, many times wearing a mask, just
Speaker 2: coming up and kidnapping people. It's like, why are we
Speaker 2: supporting this? This is insane? I mean, the police are
Speaker 2: bad enough. We don't need to make this whole thing worse.
Speaker 2: You know, we're over policed in the first place.
Speaker 5: But Guard Goldsmith, the entire Trump Justice Department is sycophantically
Speaker 5: in line with authoritarianism. Plus the Joint Chiefs are okay
Speaker 5: with Trump gathering six thousand soldiers off the coast of
Speaker 5: Venezuela while piloing ice goons into the States.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, And of course you can find Guard Goldsmith at
Speaker 5: Liberty Conspiracy weekdays at six p m.
Speaker 2: He's heaping up. This storm is about to break over
Speaker 2: our heads and everybody else too. It's just amazing.
Speaker 5: It's going to be a mere scenario.
Speaker 2: Nobody says anything about it. It's just fine.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the real Octo spooke when Edward Snowden disclosed the
Speaker 5: extent of government surveillance, he was shocked. He had to
Speaker 5: fear his own government and citizens doing nothing was an avante.
Speaker 5: Seventeen seventy six, the US debt clock says thirty seven
Speaker 5: point six eight trillion, ridiculous numbers. We're dealing with ridiculous numbers.
Speaker 5: They don't mean anything.
Speaker 2: Well, and look at the criticism that Thomas Massey got
Speaker 2: you know when the freshman congressman came in that the
Speaker 2: new people get sworn in, you'd walk up to each
Speaker 2: of them and he'd hand him one of these debt
Speaker 2: clock things that he puts on his lappelmet is a
Speaker 2: constant tally. And they called you're just a grand standard.
Speaker 2: It's like, seriously, you're just a spectator and you're not
Speaker 2: even looking at the game that's happening here. You know,
Speaker 2: you don't even care what the debt is, and you're
Speaker 2: worse than the spectator. You don't care about the outcome.
Speaker 2: It's like somebody a baseball game. There one more facial
Speaker 2: baseball game in my life, and it's just amazing. Nobody
Speaker 2: was paying any attention to the game. They're all just
Speaker 2: kind of hanging around doing their own thing.
Speaker 5: It happens then a replay on the Jumbo, and that
Speaker 5: was exactly it.
Speaker 2: You know, if there was, if actually there was actually
Speaker 2: anything at all interesting in that boring game, they would
Speaker 2: play this an instant replay.
Speaker 5: So slow mode the'n't it Avante seventeen seventy six says,
Speaker 5: and climbing about the debt clock. And of course, like
Speaker 5: I mentioned, just because they calculate the debt. Weird, it's
Speaker 5: actually closer to one hundred and fifty trillion dollars we
Speaker 5: are in debt. I forget exactly what the metric was,
Speaker 5: but it's something like, unless they actually have a plan
Speaker 5: on how to repay it, they don't count the debt.
Speaker 5: So assuming that they haven't made a plan to repay it,
Speaker 5: they just say, oh, well, you know that doesn't count yet.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's amazing.
Speaker 5: Niburu twenty twenty nine. Here's this script, here's the questions.
Speaker 5: Don't deviate.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: Oh a n is going to get their little little
Speaker 5: booklet of questions they get to ask Audi mrr. I
Speaker 5: study journalism in college. What passes for a news article
Speaker 5: today is a disgrace. These people can't even write a
Speaker 5: decent headline, let alone a proper lead guard. Goldsmith kind
Speaker 5: of like Trump's multiple marriages. They didn't last.
Speaker 2: Yeah uh his uh oath to protect the constituents kind
Speaker 2: of like his marriage vows took.
Speaker 6: A reference to the Peace Agreement.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that's right.
Speaker 5: We have no one in politics cares. It's all like
Speaker 5: they said, you know, Thomas Massey, a grand standard. That's
Speaker 5: all all these people do. It's all about getting their
Speaker 5: headlines and getting their time in the sun. Oh look
Speaker 5: I'm on camera. Isn't that wonderful? M h, Well we
Speaker 5: have Epstein Island. It's false flag time, remember nine to eleven,
Speaker 5: that's right, false flag time. That's the season. Yeah, and
Speaker 5: of course with Christmas coming up, they always love pushing
Speaker 5: the worst things through right around Christmas.
Speaker 2: Think about it. You know they bombed the Pentagon. Well,
Speaker 2: only six trillion dollars, Like, what will they do for
Speaker 2: a thirty eight trillion?
Speaker 5: The CIA is getting nervous a little.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's.
Speaker 5: KWD sixty eight. Elunch chips will do away with the
Speaker 5: need for ZIP papers, That's right. Won't that be wonderful
Speaker 5: instead of having to scan your papers?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what they're selling you. You know that by
Speaker 2: twenty thirty you don't have this app, you know, so
Speaker 2: you have paperless identity papers. Isn't that great? That's what
Speaker 2: I always wanted.
Speaker 5: Boy, I've always wanted a more cloying and efficient bureaucracy.
Speaker 5: It never leaves you. It can be always with you.
Speaker 5: Your phone will have all your relevant data and no
Speaker 5: one will be able to steal it almost immediately because
Speaker 5: that never happens.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and once they get your biometric data, then how
Speaker 2: do you get a new face? You know, he's been compromised.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I've mentioned this, but you know, my father in law,
Speaker 5: he was in the military, served in Vietnamina at a
Speaker 5: you know. So he goes to the VA for his
Speaker 5: care and at one point he shows up and they say, uh,
Speaker 5: well we've got you know this name and this name,
Speaker 5: but we don't have your name. Says those are my
Speaker 5: two children. Well, it shows that you're deceased. Took them
Speaker 5: two years to declare him not dead.
Speaker 2: System.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think the system had a miracle and he
Speaker 5: came back.
Speaker 2: Sorry, we can't treat you for that fatal disease because
Speaker 2: you're already dead.
Speaker 5: So that's the type of bureaucracy we're going to be
Speaker 5: dealing with. And imagine how difficult it will be to
Speaker 5: get an AI to admit you're not dead.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 5: Sorry.
Speaker 6: You know, we thought the death panels would be deciding
Speaker 6: who has to die, but it might just be deciding
Speaker 6: who's already dead or who's alive.
Speaker 5: Oh, my Shinderu Star bars his name.
Speaker 2: That would have been perfect Snake. I thought you were
Speaker 2: a dad.
Speaker 5: Yeah, greatly exaggerated escape from a Yeah, you do have
Speaker 5: to escape from those places, Star Barkley. They don't know
Speaker 5: how to research, swamp lover, no need research. CIA run
Speaker 5: mainstream media will tell you what you need to know exactly.
Speaker 5: Why do any research for yourself? Why I think of
Speaker 5: anything for yourself. There's somebody in a position of authority
Speaker 5: who has an opinion on it. You can just adopt that.
Speaker 5: Why bother learning anything?
Speaker 6: So often these quote unquote news medias are just rubber
Speaker 6: stamps repeating whatever they're told. There's that whole story that
Speaker 6: you mentioned often about the guy that reported sam Hi
Speaker 6: did a mass shooting, and then when you called him
Speaker 6: out on it, he said, well, I got that information
Speaker 6: from the official sources.
Speaker 2: So does Jake Tapper. That's Jake Tapper. Jake Tapper, is
Speaker 2: any CNN or something anyway, I don't watch maybe MSNBC.
Speaker 5: I don't know all these different.
Speaker 2: News So that was Jake Tapper, you know. So he says,
Speaker 2: well I got that from the government. It's like, oh, well,
Speaker 2: it must be true. Then you never take your sources
Speaker 2: when it's the government right, The.
Speaker 5: Government can never be wrong. You never have to worry
Speaker 5: about it. KWD sixty eight. Obama says Trump is wrong
Speaker 5: about ice. That's true. But Obama militarized police departments all
Speaker 5: over the.
Speaker 2: Nation, That's right. You know, that's what I was saying before.
Speaker 2: You know, you know, Alex had done before I went
Speaker 2: to Info Wars done four documentaries on the police state,
Speaker 2: and they did another one the Obama Deception. And yet
Speaker 2: it was a problem when Obama was going to militarize
Speaker 2: the police. But it's not a problem when Trump actually
Speaker 2: does what Alex was saying that Obama was setting us
Speaker 2: up for. So when they switched teams, then oh, well,
Speaker 2: this isn't what I was talking about at all. I
Speaker 2: thought the Democrats were going to do this. Since it's
Speaker 2: being done by Republicans, I guess it's fine, especially since
Speaker 2: it's he who must not be criticized, Donald Trump doing it. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break, folks, and when
Speaker 2: we come back, we're going to talk about the gaysa
Speaker 2: peace plan and is there peace? Did what actually happened
Speaker 2: in the aftermath of this, We'll see, We'll be right back.
Speaker 7: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 8: Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have
Speaker 8: access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
Speaker 8: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 8: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: All right, let's take a look at the Ganza peace plan.
Speaker 2: This is from Media Again, a left leaning anti Trump site.
Speaker 2: I said, Israel plans to cut in half the aid
Speaker 2: to Gaza as it accuses HAMASA violating the hostage agreement.
Speaker 2: The Israel will cut in half the number of AID
Speaker 2: trucks allowed into Gaza and limit distribution of assistance as
Speaker 2: they feel the tear group HAMASA has violated a recent
Speaker 2: piece agreement that includes the release of all hostages. And
Speaker 2: of course they'll bring in the lawyers to find some
Speaker 2: technicologies somewhere. The devil is in the details. And again,
Speaker 2: I didn't make a big deal out of this piece thing. Everybody,
Speaker 2: the people on the view are are saying, oh, Trump
Speaker 2: did it great for Trump, and you've got late night
Speaker 2: talk show hosts or an agreement that Trump did something
Speaker 2: great here. I don't think he did anything at all.
Speaker 2: I don't think this is going to last. I've seen
Speaker 2: these so called peace agreements come and go, especially with
Speaker 2: Israel and its neighbors for the longest time. Trump said,
Speaker 2: this took three thousand years to get to this point.
Speaker 2: And I can't figure out what he's talking about in
Speaker 2: his timeline. I mean, I'm going back and looked at
Speaker 2: my bishop Usher history of the world of that chart,
Speaker 2: and I can't figure out what he's talking about at all.
Speaker 2: You know, it was two thousand years ago that the
Speaker 2: Romans under Titus and sent the Jews out and destroyed
Speaker 2: Jerusalem and the Temple and the rest of this stuff
Speaker 2: that was recorded by Josephus in great detail. It was
Speaker 2: a great book, was it that got us on gay
Speaker 2: hinty stories for the Temple? And it's largely drawn from
Speaker 2: the historical work of Josephus. But that's two thousand years.
Speaker 2: So I don't know what he's talking about with the
Speaker 2: three thousand years. You know, he's not going back to
Speaker 2: Abraham that was longer than that. Anyway, he said to
Speaker 2: get to this point, He says, can you believe it? No,
Speaker 2: I don't believe anything that you said. I don't think
Speaker 2: you know what you're talking about. And he says, and
Speaker 2: it's going to hold up too, it's going to hold up.
Speaker 2: As usual, Trump lies about everything, so.
Speaker 6: Well, this piece deal is three thousand years in the making,
Speaker 6: it only lasted half a day.
Speaker 2: That pretty much sums it up. That's kind of what's
Speaker 2: happening there. So he and his speech there, he called
Speaker 2: out Miriam Adelson. We spoke at the Kanesset Israeli Palm,
Speaker 2: and he went to report to the Board of Directors
Speaker 2: for his administration. That's really the thing, the way to
Speaker 2: look at this. Those are the people who control him,
Speaker 2: who give him the money, and of course the board
Speaker 2: of Directors and the CEO, Miriam Adelson. Trump told Israeli
Speaker 2: lawmakers on Monday that Adelson had equivocated when asked whether
Speaker 2: she loved the US or Israel more, and paid tribute
Speaker 2: to her role in his Mid East strategy. She's telling
Speaker 2: him what to do. I know that Trump would lie.
Speaker 2: He would immediately say America, but he would also be
Speaker 2: lying about that. I know who loves more. Mariam Adison
Speaker 2: was born in tull Aviv nineteen forty five her parents.
Speaker 2: After her parents immigrated from Poland, she was trained as
Speaker 2: a physician, and she married the casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson,
Speaker 2: who owned the Vegas Sands Corporation turned it into a
Speaker 2: global gambling empire that the family sold for six and
Speaker 2: a quarter billion dollars in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 5: So can I say it's a little ironic. She was
Speaker 5: trained as a physician specializing in addiction treatment, and then
Speaker 5: Mary's a casino operator.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can help you put that, I can help
Speaker 2: you drum up some business here. We can keep these
Speaker 2: people coming back over again.
Speaker 5: The gambling addiction is actually ranked one of the worst
Speaker 5: addictions you can have.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: It leads to suicide more frequently than almost any other addiction,
Speaker 5: because you know, you're not just you can destroy yourself
Speaker 5: for generations.
Speaker 2: Who's that comedian that died on norm Norm MacDonald? Yeah,
Speaker 2: he was addicted to gambling. Yeah, it's a big deal
Speaker 2: for him and really does destroy your life. It's a shame.
Speaker 2: The couple were one of the top GOP donors over
Speaker 2: the last decade, giving six hundred million to support Trump's
Speaker 2: three presidential campaigns and to back other Republican candidates since
Speaker 2: twenty fifteen. And so again, one of the things that
Speaker 2: she said was she took aim at Israel's critics across
Speaker 2: the world, calling them foreign fans of a moss our enemies. Well,
Speaker 2: I think This is part of the nonsense he goes
Speaker 2: with all this stuff. Opposing what Israel is doing in
Speaker 2: Gaza doesn't make you a fan of a moss, but
Speaker 2: does make you an enemy of Israel. They make you
Speaker 2: the enemy if you criticize what they're doing and they
Speaker 2: call you a fan of Hamas.
Speaker 5: This is Hamas, I'm your biggest fan.
Speaker 2: This is like George W. Bush. You're either with us
Speaker 2: or you're a terrorist. Right, you're with the terrorists. So
Speaker 2: if you're with the Terrists, you're a terrorist. So the couple,
Speaker 2: the Addolsons, pushed Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli capital,
Speaker 2: moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, and to endorse Israeli control over Syria's occupied
Speaker 2: Golan Heights in twenty nineteen. So Trump awarded Miriam the
Speaker 2: Presidential Medal of Freedom twenty eighteen. And because she's fun
Speaker 2: with so much cash to according to Al Jazeera, she
Speaker 2: told Jewish voters and an event in September that they
Speaker 2: had a sacred duty to pat to back Trump. Well,
Speaker 2: she and her husband tie ten percent to Trump ten
Speaker 2: percent of their wealth, so you know they're fully backing
Speaker 2: him six hundred million dollars. It buys a lot of Trump,
Speaker 2: doesn't it. Trump at the Knesset on Monday, said, Miriam
Speaker 2: and Sheldon would come to my Oval office, they'd call me.
Speaker 2: I think they had more trips to the White House
Speaker 2: than anybody else. He said. I actually asked her once, So, Miriam,
Speaker 2: I know you love Israel. What do you love more
Speaker 2: the US or Israel? And she refused to answer, said.
Speaker 6: Trump, We've got video in the deck.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's play that. I guess she considered that to
Speaker 2: be a rhetorical question. It was pretty obvious which one
Speaker 2: she loves more.
Speaker 9: Yeah, stand up place she really is. I mean she
Speaker 9: loves this country. She loves this country. Her and her
Speaker 9: husband are so incredible. We miss him so dearly. But
Speaker 9: I actually asked her.
Speaker 10: I've got to get her in trouble with this, but
Speaker 10: I actually asked her once. They said, so, Miriam, I
Speaker 10: know of Israel. What do you love more the United
Speaker 10: States or Israel? She refused to answer. That means that
Speaker 10: might mean Israel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, is not an open question for her, it
Speaker 2: is for Trump. Except there's not an open question for
Speaker 2: me about Trump. I think I know which one he
Speaker 2: loves more and it's not America.
Speaker 6: As a matter of fact, Trump as a professional lawyer,
Speaker 6: that she would hesitate like that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, as a matter of fact, Trump loves Argentina
Speaker 2: more than he loves America. And they haven't showered him
Speaker 2: with money, but he has showered them with money right
Speaker 2: away as soon as they were having a problem, right
Speaker 2: to the rescue goes. Scott Bessant cut them a big check,
Speaker 2: a check that's bigger than what they're talking about maybe
Speaker 2: someday giving the farmers who they have directly hurt with
Speaker 2: their policies, their trade policies. They don't care about the
Speaker 2: American farmers. They knew this was going to happen because
Speaker 2: they did it to him once before, and they didn't
Speaker 2: do anything to plan for the coming in. And they're
Speaker 2: still himming and haying and delaying about helping the American
Speaker 2: farmers after the harm that they did. That they did
Speaker 2: to the American farmers, but they helped Argentina ride away,
Speaker 2: and Argentina use that money to hurt the American farmers.
Speaker 2: So MAGA really means make Argentina great again and run
Speaker 2: the American farmers into the ground. Mary Madelson again wrote
Speaker 2: that foreign fans of Hamas are our enemies, the ideological
Speaker 2: enablers of the West, who would go to any length
Speaker 2: to eradicate us from the Middle East. I'll tell you
Speaker 2: who she has gone to war with. She's gone to
Speaker 2: war against the First Amendment. She and all of Israel
Speaker 2: want to destroy our constitution. It's one thing to buy politicians,
Speaker 2: it's another thing to try to destroy and set in
Speaker 2: legal structure, destroy the First Amendment. They lost me on that.
Speaker 2: I'll tell you what. I have never on their side.
Speaker 5: But disgusting to me that Donald Trump casino owner Mary Maidleson,
Speaker 5: wife of child Nadleson, casino owner, as we've mete. You know,
Speaker 5: gambling mafia, mafia, gambling addiction is awful. Vegas is built
Speaker 5: on the destruction of lives. There was a time where
Speaker 5: I don't think anyone who could have owned a casino
Speaker 5: would have been accepted as a politician America like, no,
Speaker 5: that's a gross business. We don't want you. Yeah, as
Speaker 5: part of the power structure. But now she's, oh yeah,
Speaker 5: she's donating six hundred million two Trump, former casino owner
Speaker 5: who's now president. Just in my opinion, again shows how
Speaker 5: far America has fallen and who will just allow politics?
Speaker 2: You got to say, Sheldon Allison knew how to run
Speaker 2: a casino, six of them end of the ground, which
Speaker 2: is an accomplishment and of itself. Lucky Loser is the
Speaker 2: name of the book where they talk about how incompetent
Speaker 2: Trump is. But yeah, that's exactly the point that my
Speaker 2: dad made. We went to nineteen sixty one. Who went
Speaker 2: to see Walt disney World and not Walt disney World,
Speaker 2: Walt Disney Disneyland in California. Right. Disney World didn't open
Speaker 2: until I was in high school, but disney Land opened
Speaker 2: in nineteen fifty five, so o Jean. We went cross
Speaker 2: country in the car. That was an interesting experience back
Speaker 2: in the day where we didn't have air conditioning, going
Speaker 2: through Death Valley health the metal dashboard that they had
Speaker 2: in the chevies back then and the plastic seats, and
Speaker 2: then we would go up to got across. That was
Speaker 2: one experience. I don't remember which when we did first.
Speaker 2: I think it was the Colorado thing. This first we
Speaker 2: went up Pike's Peak and there was snow at the
Speaker 2: top during the middle of summer, you know, And then
Speaker 2: we get to Death Valley. There's a memorable trip. Anyway,
Speaker 2: We also went through Vegas, and I remember my dad
Speaker 2: taking in and saying, look at these because in those days,
Speaker 2: you didn't dress like a bomb unless you really were
Speaker 2: a bomb. Now everybody spends a lot of money to
Speaker 2: dress like a bomb. As a matter of fact, Billy
Speaker 2: Joel even sang about that back in the eighties, they
Speaker 2: got to spend a lot of money to dress trash, right.
Speaker 2: But back in those days, you dressed nice if you
Speaker 2: could afford to. So if you did and ford it,
Speaker 2: you dressed like a bump. And so those poorly dressed
Speaker 2: people were pouring money into these machines. And he said,
Speaker 2: look at this building, and then look at these people,
Speaker 2: and tell me that this is a fair game. You know,
Speaker 2: it's not. It's a suckers game. And that's how people
Speaker 2: like Sheldon Addison got rich. Uriel Abbeloff, professor of politics
Speaker 2: at Tel Aviv University, told Newsweek that what was agreed
Speaker 2: between Israel and Amos should not be confused as a
Speaker 2: peace deal. He said it is a survival pact for
Speaker 2: leaders who thrive on conflict. The agreement forced upon them
Speaker 2: by external patrons like the US and cutter is deliberately
Speaker 2: vague on core issues, allowing them both to claim a win.
Speaker 2: In other words, Israel thrives on conflict. Hamas thrives on conflict.
Speaker 2: They don't want to stop this, but the people who
Speaker 2: are paying them, their patrons are are telling them that
Speaker 2: they're going to sign this deal, and they leave it
Speaker 2: really vague, so they've got wiggle room and they can
Speaker 2: claim that they won, and so nothing is really going
Speaker 2: to happen. But again, as I said, you got the
Speaker 2: people in the view going crazy for Trump and saying,
Speaker 2: look at this, he did it. And of course Stephen Colbert,
Speaker 2: Jimmy Kimmel praising Trump for the Gaza cease fire deal.
Speaker 2: This is the headline from Breitbart, And I have to say,
Speaker 2: who cares? Since when do we care what these people say?
Speaker 2: They're always wrong about everything. They said it's important to
Speaker 2: give credit where credit is due. Well, the same thing
Speaker 2: is they work for the same people that Trump works for,
Speaker 2: same people that own Trump own the networks. Kim Moll said,
Speaker 2: what a day for Donald Trump. You know what, he
Speaker 2: finally did something positive today and I want to give
Speaker 2: him credit for it because I know he's not the
Speaker 2: type of guy to take credit for himself. Now, that's
Speaker 2: a funny joke. You don't usually hear funny jokes from
Speaker 2: Kimmel anymore. He said, well, we're only in the first
Speaker 2: These will undoubtedly be a long and tricky process. The
Speaker 2: fact is the bombing has stopped. Well that's not the fact,
Speaker 2: and so we'll talk about what's going on with that.
Speaker 2: People are still being killed there. Noulty Breibart says, the
Speaker 2: silence from Hollywood about Israel's peace deal proves that Hollywood
Speaker 2: never really wanted a Gaza ceasefire. Well, maybe the silence
Speaker 2: is from skepticism. Maybe it's the fact that they don't
Speaker 2: really think that the killing is going to stop. And
Speaker 2: actually the killing did not stop and the destruction did
Speaker 2: not stop. With the peace deal from Russia, we have
Speaker 2: a foreign minister. Lavrov said that Russia has repeatedly assessed
Speaker 2: it as the best thing on the negotiating table at
Speaker 2: the moment. However, it is essential, he says, to stop
Speaker 2: the bloodshed as soon as possible and to resolve the
Speaker 2: grave humanitarian problems. But of course the Palestinian issue is
Speaker 2: not resolved by this, and there will not be peace
Speaker 2: because of this. Trump's plan mainly focuses on the situation
Speaker 2: in Gaza while only addressing the Palestinian statehood in the
Speaker 2: most general terms. The US and Israel were two of
Speaker 2: only ten countries which flatly rejected a two state solution
Speaker 2: at the UN. So he said, you know, if you
Speaker 2: don't address the core issue, it's not going to last.
Speaker 2: And so all this stuff about three thousand years. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, if anybody's got any idea what
Speaker 2: they think, what's even talking about, let us know here
Speaker 2: in the comments and LANs can be on the lookout
Speaker 2: for that. What this three thousand years is about. I'm
Speaker 2: scratching my head to try to figure that out.
Speaker 5: I have to assume it's just you know, its all right, Well,
Speaker 5: Jesus was two thousand years ago, so I got to
Speaker 5: go back further than that, and he picked, I'll add
Speaker 5: another thousand on top of its.
Speaker 6: Stronger than two thousand years. Oh, three thousand years.
Speaker 2: Well, I think David was about a thousand years before Jesus.
Speaker 2: So mate, but that doesn't make any sense as a
Speaker 2: starting point anyway. Israeli forces kill at least so in
Speaker 2: Palestinians in Gaza despite the ceasefire. As I said before,
Speaker 2: it doesn't stop. And you know, the murder hasn't stopped,
Speaker 2: the starvation hasn't stopped. Maybe a little bit less, and
Speaker 2: they'll pretend and pat themselves on the bank for a
Speaker 2: couple of weeks. Trump says, Israel has used America's weapons
Speaker 2: very well. We make the best weapons in the world,
Speaker 2: and we got lots of them, and we've given a
Speaker 2: lot of them to Israel. Frankly, he said, and the
Speaker 2: Knesset applauded. They like what's been done with that. Israeli soldiers, however,
Speaker 2: torched food and homes and torched a critical sewage treatment plant,
Speaker 2: and the wake of the ceasefire announcement, soldiers called the
Speaker 2: mass arson of Gaza City their quote final touches. It's
Speaker 2: you called the final torches. Among these structures that drop
Speaker 2: This is from drop Site News. Among the structures that
Speaker 2: drop Site discovered had been set on fire by departing
Speaker 2: soldiers was the she Ajlyn sewage treatment station, a central
Speaker 2: component of Gaza City's sanitation network. The attack is a
Speaker 2: blow that could push Gaza City's wastewater system to point zero.
Speaker 2: The plant is one of Gaza's oldest and warned that
Speaker 2: its destruction will set back planned reconstruction efforts by years.
Speaker 2: I mean, they signed a ceasefire, so why set it
Speaker 2: on fire. That's another rhetorical question, isn't it. So the
Speaker 2: Israeli soldiers are saying it's one last memory, as they
Speaker 2: do that. The homes that were burned had been some
Speaker 2: of the only ones remaining left intact because they were
Speaker 2: used as military staging areas going to review of satellite
Speaker 2: imagery of the area. So there were a few homes
Speaker 2: over standing. They took them over and lived in them,
Speaker 2: and then when the ceasefire began, they burned those homes down.
Speaker 2: Not all homes taken over by Israeli forces were burned down.
Speaker 2: Social media posts indicate some units simply left them trashed
Speaker 2: and vandalized on the walls with enjoy. This sluts one
Speaker 2: soldier road on social media. The Palestinians returning to find
Speaker 2: their homes ramsacked. We shall return here. Let's spray painted
Speaker 2: over the wall of a house taken over by Israeli
Speaker 2: forces in Gaza and another one. So let's see if
Speaker 2: anybody's got an idea about the three thousand year metric
Speaker 2: that he's got.
Speaker 5: Perhaps one of you can enlighten us Epstein Islands as
Speaker 5: gold is going to be forty two hundred an ounced tonight,
Speaker 5: do z ox have ox as? I want to cry.
Speaker 5: I'm a relative whom I begged to buy gold and silver.
Speaker 5: They would have already doubled their wealth. Makes me sick.
Speaker 5: Markie Mark in New Jersey spowning Epstein Island says it's
Speaker 5: already surpassed forty two hundred ounce see here, and he
Speaker 5: links to market Watch.
Speaker 6: Well, if it makes you feel any better, the dollar
Speaker 6: is still going down.
Speaker 2: So yeah, there's a lot more to go. And I
Speaker 2: don't think the end is here for gold at all.
Speaker 5: So Jerry al Atalo informed men and women are familar
Speaker 5: with the term the brain is the battlefield of the
Speaker 5: future from Giordano. Some suggest US euro warfare operations are
Speaker 5: well underway against Americans swamp lover projects, Mockingbird is alive
Speaker 5: and well that's right, Debrew twenty twenty nine. VA worst
Speaker 5: of the worst medical malpractice systems on the planet. Yeah,
Speaker 5: it's a I've never heard a good story about the VA,
Speaker 5: not a single one. Anytime it starts with well I
Speaker 5: was at the VA, you know you're in for some
Speaker 5: kind of horror story. Eye Handy.
Speaker 6: The liberals still want the government to do all healthcare.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you like your vacare, you can, you can have it.
Speaker 2: But I like you. You like your insurance company, you
Speaker 2: can keep it.
Speaker 5: I don't like it. You don't want to keep it.
Speaker 5: Handy says, I tried blackjack once, lost twenty dollars in
Speaker 5: just a minute or so. It may be mad, So
Speaker 5: I threw away another thirty dollars even quicker. Depression set
Speaker 5: in immediately.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Karen and I went to a trade show once
Speaker 2: for the video industry. They would always do it in Vegas,
Speaker 2: and they would always evidently they must have gotten cheaper
Speaker 2: rates because they always do it in August August and Vegas.
Speaker 2: Well Miss anyway, one year, for sure we went the
Speaker 2: know if it was the airline or the hotel, but anyway,
Speaker 2: we had a voucher for like twenty bucks. And so
Speaker 2: we went to the Tropic Canon, which has now been
Speaker 2: torn down. And we walk in and we're kind of
Speaker 2: looking around. You're like tourists, you know, looking up this
Speaker 2: kind of thing. They always say, you know, we go
Speaker 2: to New York City, you can tell the terurists are
Speaker 2: looking up at the buildings and everything. While somebody comes
Speaker 2: up and picks their pocket. So anyway, we look like
Speaker 2: a couple of roubs from the country, and so we
Speaker 2: kind of walk over. We're looking at the Roulet wheel
Speaker 2: and there was a woman who was running it. She said,
Speaker 2: put it all on one thing. You put it all
Speaker 2: on the Roulet wheel, and I'll tell you how to
Speaker 2: do it. But she said, not the Roulet wheel. It
Speaker 2: was the vertical things like Wheel of Fortune, except I
Speaker 2: guess if this in the casinos Wheel of misfortune, said
Speaker 2: put it all on one thing, and she'said, and win
Speaker 2: and lose, walk away, walk away, she's so he did,
Speaker 2: and we didn't win anything.
Speaker 5: You gotta get out while you can.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 5: My one experience at a casino is one of my
Speaker 5: friends he wanted to go for his birthday, and I
Speaker 5: brought fifty dollars specifically just like this, you know, he
Speaker 5: wants everyone to have a good time. I'm planning to
Speaker 5: lose this fifty dollars. Once I lose, I'm done. And
Speaker 5: just it was so depressing just seeing mostly you know,
Speaker 5: old people in their eighties or older, just sitting at
Speaker 5: the slot machines, just pulling the lever over.
Speaker 2: And over, again. Yeah, it's just, you.
Speaker 5: Know, there's no one else. There's no family there with them.
Speaker 5: They don't have any children or grandchildren or anything. They're
Speaker 5: just alone at a slot machine, putting whatever money they
Speaker 5: have left into it. And it's just horribly depressing. They're
Speaker 5: if I if I never set foot to a casino again,
Speaker 5: it'll be too soon because it was just so incredibly
Speaker 5: sad to watch.
Speaker 2: Let's cover of the book Lucky are about Trump and
Speaker 2: this casino. It's a slot and the things that are
Speaker 2: going around. It's got all the lemons and the cherries
Speaker 2: and all that of stuff, and then it's got Trump
Speaker 2: face and there's three Trump faces and they're about to
Speaker 2: line up.
Speaker 5: However, I also don't understand you know, the draw of
Speaker 5: a slot machine either. It's just you know, lights and sounds.
Speaker 5: You know, it's like a baby's toy for an adult.
Speaker 5: At least with something like blackjack or you know, some
Speaker 5: other card game, there's an element of skill, you know,
Speaker 5: you can tell.
Speaker 2: That's why they don't let the card counters play, and
Speaker 2: they watch them very very closely. No, no, you know,
Speaker 2: the surveillance industry really got its start and the casinos.
Speaker 2: The I did some work for the Department Transportation in
Speaker 2: North Carolina for a short period of time, and they
Speaker 2: had cameras that could zoom in, you know, they stationed
Speaker 2: along the interstate so they could see if there was
Speaker 2: an accident or backup so they could do something about it.
Speaker 2: And you could zoom in on those things. It's amazing
Speaker 2: how far those things would go. And those were cameras
Speaker 2: that they set up for the casino, and I thought,
Speaker 2: that's look all the way down the interest they'd imagine,
Speaker 2: you know, when you're in the casino, they just got
Speaker 2: a short distance from you. It's like a microscope.
Speaker 5: They can read everything that's going on in your hand cards.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the casino industry is terrible and it preys upon people.
Speaker 5: It's very sad. It's even sadder when it's Vegas.
Speaker 2: Trump Trump's big influences are professional wrestling and casino industry.
Speaker 5: I should tell you exactly where he stands.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's bad enough in Vegas, where you've got all
Speaker 5: the lights and the showmanship of it all. But that
Speaker 5: casino I went to was the one in Oklahoma. I
Speaker 5: don't know what it's called, but it's an Indian casino.
Speaker 5: When it's just it's so sad. It's even sadder than
Speaker 5: a Vegas casino is Yeah.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I remember driving through uh uh, Louisiana. They had
Speaker 6: like little gas station type casino things where they just
Speaker 6: have cheap Christmas lights stapled around. You would think that
Speaker 6: they could afford a nicer place of people throwing away
Speaker 6: their money.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I want that's what I want. I want nice
Speaker 2: surroundings when I throw all my money into the machine.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you're not gonna get that. At the seven to eleven,
Speaker 5: swamp Lover says Project Mockingbird is live, and well where
Speaker 5: that one Trump lover praising his handler. That's right. When
Speaker 5: he's talking about Mary Edlson Epstein Island. There really ought
Speaker 5: to be a law that ends dual citizenship. And that
Speaker 5: shouldn't even be a question. That should just be immediate.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, we're talking about Trump and Adelson. You know,
Speaker 2: it is disgusting to see somebody like Mike Johnson who
Speaker 2: is a total sycophant to Trump, and it's equally disgusting
Speaker 2: to watch Trump be a total sycophant to Israel. And
Speaker 2: it's just there's this pecking order that is almost comical. Actually,
Speaker 2: this comical, except that we're the bottom of the peking order,
Speaker 2: so I guess that part of it's not too funny.
Speaker 5: So Gwy says Vegas is going down. Nobody got money
Speaker 5: to waste on bs.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's also the hassle that they're putting people through
Speaker 2: for tramling. Trambling is what's really going down. It truly
Speaker 2: is amazing.
Speaker 6: I was about to say Vegas may be dying, but
Speaker 6: online gambling is exploding. It's a bigger problem now than
Speaker 6: ever before by a large margin. So I don't think
Speaker 6: it's that gambling is going away. It's just going online.
Speaker 7: M hm.
Speaker 5: They made it extremely easy, and as I've said, gambling
Speaker 5: addiction is incredibly difficult to break, and if you have
Speaker 5: an addictive personality, with it being so easy, it's affecting
Speaker 5: a lot more people than it has in the past. Actually,
Speaker 5: it's going to ruin a lot of lives. Yes, soiling
Speaker 5: no read that when a possum king Adelson is lobbying
Speaker 5: hard for gambling in Texas. Oh good, isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 5: Wally Wallers. The biggest casino operator in Oregon is the state Lottery.
Speaker 5: We have state run gambling machines everywhere. Well, they've called it,
Speaker 5: you know, I've heard people referred to it as the
Speaker 5: stupid tax. So maybe they'll just start taxing you directly
Speaker 5: for it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's fitting that they use the money for education,
Speaker 2: except they don't educate people about the right things. You know,
Speaker 2: I take it and educate them about.
Speaker 5: Gamstico statistics class in school.
Speaker 6: Well, when you think about what the Department of Education's
Speaker 6: goals really are, it is fitting that they would use
Speaker 6: the money from the idiot tax to pay for the
Speaker 6: thing that's dumbing down America.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 5: Wally Wallras note read that one Niberu twenty twenty nine
Speaker 5: says that's how Trump's clan made its fortune. He spelled
Speaker 5: clan with a k gambling and prostitution in Alaska during
Speaker 5: the Gold Rush. What a classy fellow from a line
Speaker 5: of classy fellows.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you talk about these casinos and Trump's connection. And then,
Speaker 2: of course Zameachis who did Back to the Future. He
Speaker 2: said he pattern to beff after Trump. I say that
Speaker 2: more and more all the time. He nailed it, didn't
Speaker 2: he really really?
Speaker 5: It was very prescient, perhaps a bit too precient. Biff
Speaker 5: Ruler of the World, maybe if he hadn't done that,
Speaker 5: Trump would have seem to be like, I could do that.
Speaker 5: I could absolutely do that. Nine ceasefires are only short
Speaker 5: pauses to rearm and restrategize.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so we look at it, and you know, they
Speaker 2: have made nineteen eighty four and Brave New World and
Speaker 2: Back to the Future all come true. We live at
Speaker 2: the nexus of those three the ben diagram. You're here, right,
Speaker 2: were those three movies intersected?
Speaker 5: If only we had a Marty and doc somewhere to
Speaker 5: go back and reset all this. Yeah, swamp lover, Israel
Speaker 5: can be given guns to kill children, but I'm restricted
Speaker 5: on what I can have to hunt. Make it make sense. Yeah,
Speaker 5: well maybe if you were to convince this the IA
Speaker 5: that the deer were you know, some sort of terrorist threat.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm. Well, you know, Trump got Trump got a
Speaker 2: lot of praise for people, even you know, for this
Speaker 2: peace thing, as they completely ignore that he is blowing
Speaker 2: up yet another boat. This time they say it's six people.
Speaker 2: I don't even know if they know how many people
Speaker 2: are on board the boat. They've given no details about
Speaker 2: what they know anything. Of course, there's no due process.
Speaker 2: That's the key issue. And this is just like it
Speaker 2: is with the illegal immigrants in the US. We have
Speaker 2: to follow the rule of law. There's international law that
Speaker 2: says this is an international war crime. And this guy
Speaker 2: thinks that he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. And all
Speaker 2: these people, whether you're talking about the View where you're
Speaker 2: talking about Stephen Colbert or Jimmy Kimmel, they're absolutely clueless
Speaker 2: if they don't criticize him for these extra judicial killings.
Speaker 2: All the time the US military conducted. He had another
Speaker 2: strike on a boat alleged to be trafficking drugs off
Speaker 2: the coast of Venezuela, killing six people. And I read
Speaker 2: an article last week where they went back and they
Speaker 2: referred to what Terte did in the Philippines. And he's
Speaker 2: now facing trial at the International Criminal Court, and rightfully so,
Speaker 2: because he was frustrated with drug use, and he said, well,
Speaker 2: we're just going to shoot people on the street. You
Speaker 2: thinks somebody's a drug user, kill them. They killed tens
Speaker 2: of thousands of people doing that. That is what's dangerous
Speaker 2: about this. You have to have the rule of law. Anyway,
Speaker 2: Trump said the vessel was quote affiliated with a designated
Speaker 2: terrorist organization unquote, but he didn't name any organization, he
Speaker 2: didn't provide any evidence to back up the assertion. Again,
Speaker 2: he did this without proof, He did this without due process.
Speaker 2: And you know, we stop and think about how they
Speaker 2: have operated the war on drugs and how effective has
Speaker 2: that been. You know, we look at this and say,
Speaker 2: this is the perfect of the means not being justified
Speaker 2: by your desired or stated ends. Right, we can all
Speaker 2: agree that we'd like to see people not on drugs.
Speaker 2: Has any of this stuff put a dent in drug usage? No? No,
Speaker 2: it's actually made the drugs were intense more concentrated, and
Speaker 2: it's given us all these other problems as well, like
Speaker 2: civil asset forfeiture and the non swat team raids predominantly
Speaker 2: about the drug war. So now we moved on beyond
Speaker 2: asked civil quote unquote asset forfeiture where they can steal
Speaker 2: your car and accuse your car or your inanimate object,
Speaker 2: whether it's your car or your plane or your home
Speaker 2: or whatever. They just steal it and charge the or cash.
Speaker 2: You know, US government versus nine thousand dollars of cash.
Speaker 2: They don't charge you even with a crime, They don't
Speaker 2: certainly find you guilty, they don't even bother with that.
Speaker 2: They just take your stuff. What we're seeing here, in
Speaker 2: a sense, I think, is an extension of this kind
Speaker 2: of corruption. We go from asset forfeiture to life forfeiture. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, you're doing things that look to us kind
Speaker 2: of like you might be doing drugs running. So we're
Speaker 2: going to kill you in international waters. Even if you
Speaker 2: turn back, we're going to kill you. This is simply murder, folks.
Speaker 2: And I will not praise Trump for anything that he's
Speaker 2: even if the peace deal was real, and I don't
Speaker 2: believe that it is, I would still not praise him
Speaker 2: as long as he's doing this type of thing.
Speaker 7: Here.
Speaker 2: Intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking narcotics, said Trump I
Speaker 2: was associated with illicit narco terrorist networks and was transitting
Speaker 2: along a known dto route. Well, there were in an
Speaker 2: area that they say, if you're in this area, you're
Speaker 2: trafficking drugs. Proof, that's it. Proof and proof there you go.
Speaker 2: Not how we've done it, not how it's still being
Speaker 2: done in other areas. They don't want to try to
Speaker 2: do a regime change of a country, and it's not
Speaker 2: how we should do it either. So it was conducted
Speaker 2: in their national waters and six male Narco terrorists aboard
Speaker 2: the vessel were killed and the strike no iss US
Speaker 2: forces were harmed. That's the end of what Trump had
Speaker 2: to say. So again, I'd say, prove it, prove it
Speaker 2: in court. And guess what, even if Trump had proven
Speaker 2: this in court, there's still no death penalty for what
Speaker 2: he alleges that they were doing. How can the world
Speaker 2: can you justify this? And how in the world can
Speaker 2: people remain silent about this? Again, even if they were
Speaker 2: found guilty with due process, there's no long in the
Speaker 2: books that says we give a death penalty for this.
Speaker 2: So Rand Paul has announced that he's co sponsoring a
Speaker 2: war powers resolution that would stop the president from being
Speaker 2: able to unilaterally conduct such strikes. Well, you already have that.
Speaker 2: It's called the tenth Amendment, and it's also Congress that
Speaker 2: it's not just a tenth Amendment. You know, the war
Speaker 2: powers that are defined in the Constitution say that it
Speaker 2: has to be a declared war, and so they have
Speaker 2: deluded their power to declare war. Done that deliberately, It's
Speaker 2: I guess they do need to put something in there.
Speaker 2: But anyway, he said, blowing up boats without due process
Speaker 2: could risk unintended escalation and trigger regime change efforts, an
Speaker 2: approach that history has repeatedly shown to fail. That's why
Speaker 2: I am co sponsoring a War Powers resolution to stop it.
Speaker 2: Congress must reassert its authority, he said. So this is
Speaker 2: from CNN, they said. Even some conservatives have unease about this,
Speaker 2: especially because it was a This military had destroyed one
Speaker 2: of these boats that had turned around before it was hit.
Speaker 2: Paul also publicly criticized Vice President Vance last month after
Speaker 2: he celebrated one of the strikes. Paul said, in response
Speaker 2: the Vice president, he said, what a despicable and thoughtless
Speaker 2: sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.
Speaker 2: But that says it all right there. Will said so
Speaker 2: in comments of the White House during an event with
Speaker 2: the Argentinian President Javier Malaya on Tuesday, because again we
Speaker 2: put Argentina before even Americans. Americans come dead last. This
Speaker 2: is not an America first administration. This is America dead last. Everybody,
Speaker 2: even Argentina gets ahead of us. Well. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett,
Speaker 2: who was meeting with Javier Malai to write him some
Speaker 2: big checks, noted the strikes as he advocated for building
Speaker 2: economic bridges with other nations. Isn't that nice? We're using
Speaker 2: our economic strength to create peace, are you really? Are
Speaker 2: you just lying murders. That's not creating peace at all.
Speaker 2: So again, the headline, as it was put in by
Speaker 2: the Gateway Pundit, cheers all of this stuff, another Venezuelan
Speaker 2: drug boat, six narco terrorists killed. Well, again, none of
Speaker 2: that is true, Gateway Pundit. None of this has been proven.
Speaker 2: You should and you don't put quotes in it. You
Speaker 2: don't attribute this, you don't question any of it. You
Speaker 2: just put it out why because you are Trump influencers.
Speaker 2: You're not journalists. You're not being honest about this stuff.
Speaker 2: None of this is proven. If it were proven, it
Speaker 2: still would not be justified. We don't have the death
Speaker 2: penalty for what. Do you even alleges that they did?
Speaker 2: Then they say, War Secretary Pete Hegsath said, according to
Speaker 2: President Trump, the boat was carrying enough drugs to kill
Speaker 2: twenty five to fifty thousand people. Isn't that interesting? That's
Speaker 2: the way they always talk about fentanel all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff, and it's like, how this is as absurd.
Speaker 2: Nobody ever calls them out on this kind of absurdity. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you're going to Is that the purpose of these things
Speaker 2: to kill that many people? Yeah, if they overdosed, you know,
Speaker 2: you can have you could overdose twenty five to fifty
Speaker 2: thousand people. I'm not supporting drug use at all, but
Speaker 2: I'm saying this type of talk is idiotic and meaningless.
Speaker 2: It is like Barack Obama saying, you know, how many
Speaker 2: jobs that they saved or created. It's like, wait a minute,
Speaker 2: You've never used the Bureau of Labor statistics to talk
Speaker 2: about jobs that were saved before. That's purely subjective and
Speaker 2: made up. You know, this is not a new job.
Speaker 2: You know, they look at a new job and they say, well,
Speaker 2: we created that job. No, you didn't create that job.
Speaker 2: Somebody who risked their capital and their hard work created
Speaker 2: that job. You take credit for it. Of course, Obama
Speaker 2: is famous for that, talking about how you know you
Speaker 2: didn't build that. We built it because we built the
Speaker 2: infrastructure and this and that, and we taxed you to
Speaker 2: build the infrastructure and did it very inefficiently. But you know,
Speaker 2: he's famous for taking credit for that, even more so
Speaker 2: than most people do. But it always would make me
Speaker 2: cringe when I would hear Republicans talk about jobs that
Speaker 2: they created and so forth. They didn't create anything. And
Speaker 2: so when you talk about enough drugs to kill tens
Speaker 2: of thousands of people, come on, this is like Trump
Speaker 2: bragging that he saved millions of wives when he killed
Speaker 2: tens of millions of people with his injections.
Speaker 6: Not to mention, they know exactly how many drugs were
Speaker 6: on the boat that they blew up. No exactly what
Speaker 6: did they sweep through the water and collect all of
Speaker 6: it and total it up?
Speaker 2: All this is just pure fantasy. They have no they
Speaker 2: released no details about anything. You know, they don't tell
Speaker 2: you the quantity of drugs. They just tell well, it
Speaker 2: would have killed twenty to five to fifty thousand people.
Speaker 2: And Gateway Pundit just repeats that dutifully as if they're
Speaker 2: doing Trump press releases, because that's all they are. Intelligence
Speaker 2: confirmed that the vessel was trafficking narcotics, they said. Trump
Speaker 2: further confirmed the death of six Narco terrorists the attack. Well,
Speaker 2: I don't think that they are terrorists, even if they
Speaker 2: were doing drugs, and that's again not established, so very
Speaker 2: discussed it. Maybe the Gateway Pundit's trying to get Pentagon privileges.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, there's about to be a lot fewer
Speaker 5: people in the press room.
Speaker 2: So that's right. Well, the way the AP reported with
Speaker 2: their headline, US kills six people and a strike on
Speaker 2: a boat accused of carrying drugs near Venezuela, now that's legit.
Speaker 2: You know, I accuse the Associated Press of being associated propaganda.
Speaker 2: But that is an accurate headline for what happened. That's
Speaker 2: a neutral headline, doesn't take one side or the other.
Speaker 2: But then they go on to say the Trump administration
Speaker 2: has yet to provide underlying evidence to lawmakers proving that
Speaker 2: the boats targeted by the US military were in fact
Speaker 2: carrying narcotics. According to two US officials who were not
Speaker 2: authorized to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of
Speaker 2: anonymity following Tuesday's strike, or Hey Rodrigues, president of Venezuela's
Speaker 2: National Assembly, close ally of Maduro, said the objective is
Speaker 2: not the search for truth to the press, he says,
Speaker 2: and much less it's about fighting drug trafficking, he says,
Speaker 2: it's about looking for a way to have an excuse
Speaker 2: for aggression. We're not asking you to make anything up. Rather,
Speaker 2: we're asking you to defend the truth. This is a
Speaker 2: plea that he made to local media outlets. Well, the
Speaker 2: truth is lying on the floor dead. Trump meanwhile, has
Speaker 2: a tantrum over what he says is the worst picture
Speaker 2: ever of himself. I guess he is the hair apparent
Speaker 2: to the throne when you look at this. They showed
Speaker 2: him basically bald, and he doesn't like this. They took
Speaker 2: a picture from the bottom up, and he likes the
Speaker 2: fact that he was on the cover of Time magazine
Speaker 2: and they're calling this his triumph. This gaza cease fire
Speaker 2: to you. Well, but he doesn't like the picture that
Speaker 2: they put a super bad picture, he said. And I
Speaker 2: think it is a super bad take to think that
Speaker 2: he has accomplished anything here. Really, So, the Time magazine
Speaker 2: released a special edition hailing the events as quote his
Speaker 2: triumph and detailing has administration had gone to great links
Speaker 2: to try to secure peace. The image was taken looking
Speaker 2: up at his face as he stares in the distance
Speaker 2: with a serious expression. Time magazine, he said, wrote a
Speaker 2: relatively good story about me, but the picture may be
Speaker 2: the worst of all time. They disappeared my hair, and
Speaker 2: then something floating on top of my head that looked
Speaker 2: like a floating crown, but an extremely small one. He
Speaker 2: described the cover as really weird, and he continued, I
Speaker 2: never liked taking pictures from underneath angles, but this is
Speaker 2: a super bad picture and deserves to be called out.
Speaker 2: What are they doing and why? Well, wait till he
Speaker 2: sees how Spitting Image does him. Spitting Image has his
Speaker 2: hair as to Pay as a special character, and they
Speaker 2: show him as as bald, and this to Pay is
Speaker 2: flying around and talking to him kind of like, well,
Speaker 2: it's a Marvel character Doctor Strange, kind of like Doctor
Speaker 2: Strange's cape. So anyway, tomahawks will not solve anything, you know,
Speaker 2: this is the the Taco response is now going to
Speaker 2: be tomahawks and Kiev mister peace, mister Peace prize. So
Speaker 2: just more war, more death, more military industrial complex profits,
Speaker 2: all from mister Peace Prize. This is Luka Shinko speaking
Speaker 2: in mintzk on Tuesday. He stressed that arming keV with
Speaker 2: these missiles would not resolve the conflict, but could quote
Speaker 2: escalate the situation into a nuclear war. And he's right,
Speaker 2: it will escalate, whether it's to the nuclear war or not.
Speaker 2: It is a stupid move. It is a provocative move.
Speaker 2: It is not a move that moves US towards peace.
Speaker 2: Putin has warned that the potential Commahawk deliveries would force
Speaker 2: Moscow to strengthen its air defenses and deal a major
Speaker 2: blow to US Russia relations. He also stressed that the
Speaker 2: missiles would not change the balance of power on the battlefield. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, stop and think about this. I remember when
Speaker 2: we had the Cuban missile crisis and I was a kid,
Speaker 2: and they were Russia wanted to put nuclear missiles in Cuba,
Speaker 2: which is just a couple of minutes away from landing
Speaker 2: in Florida, where I lived at the time. But imagine,
Speaker 2: you know, this is so much more provocative. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're actually shooting these things into Russia. Can they still
Speaker 2: sell this narrative that Ukraine is just the first Domino
Speaker 2: and all of Europe, that Russia is the aggressor in
Speaker 2: terms of a Pan European war, that that's their goal.
Speaker 2: This is even more absurd than the Vietnamese thing. You know.
Speaker 2: The Vietnamese thing was that well, you know, the Vietcong
Speaker 2: are really surrogates of the Chinese, and the Chinese seek
Speaker 2: to take over all of of Asia. There at that point,
Speaker 2: and yet when we look at this, this whole narrative
Speaker 2: that Russia is the aggressor. I mean, we've seen the
Speaker 2: aggression from NATO, We've seen the civil war in Ukraine,
Speaker 2: We've seen Kiev killing and bombing their own people. And
Speaker 2: now they're sending in literally live missiles into Russia. And
Speaker 2: Russia has not hit the nuclear button yet, and so
Speaker 2: I think it's a bit absurd that they're portraying this
Speaker 2: whole thing still as a domino theory that's going on there. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: Zelenski our ally is stripping citizenship from prominent political opponents.
Speaker 2: Maybe Trump will do that, maybe the next night. Take
Speaker 2: CHUCKI Schumer's citizenship, you're no longer a citizen. Of course,
Speaker 2: it actually be done to ilhan Omar. She should have
Speaker 2: her citizenship remerved. It was her whole family came in
Speaker 2: under false pretenses, in violation of the law. You're not
Speaker 2: allowed to immigrate into the US if you are a
Speaker 2: member of the Communist Party. I mean, that's whether you
Speaker 2: like or not, that's the law. I do like that law.
Speaker 2: But nevertheless, they lied because her father worked for the
Speaker 2: Somalian government and he was a Marxist publicly as a Marxist.
Speaker 2: So the whole family came in and false pretenses. But anyway, the.
Speaker 5: Whole you know, did she marry her brother to all that?
Speaker 5: So there's multiple lies under her immigration status which could
Speaker 5: immediately be used to say, no, you're no longer a
Speaker 5: US citizen. We're revoking it.
Speaker 2: Well, Zelensky doesn't have to have any reason. He's just
Speaker 2: doing it by decree. By executive order. Zelenski confirmed signing
Speaker 2: a decree stripping certain individuals of the Ukrainian citizenship. He
Speaker 2: has stripped several prominent public figures of Ukrainian citizenship, including
Speaker 2: the mayor of Odessa, a renowned ballet dancer. Can't have
Speaker 2: that ballet opposition, right, this guy's going to have to
Speaker 2: come to American do ballet parking, and a former MP,
Speaker 2: and all of them had criticized Zelenski's policies in the past.
Speaker 2: Odessa Mayer had been known for his consistent opposition to
Speaker 2: Ukraine's policy of demolishing monuments it sees as linked to Russia.
Speaker 2: He's repeatedly denied having Russian citizenship and vowed to go
Speaker 2: to court in response to media reports about him being
Speaker 2: stripped of his nationality. Born in Ukraine. The ballet dancer
Speaker 2: as a citizen of both Russia and Serbia, and has
Speaker 2: spent his teen years at the Academy of the British
Speaker 2: Royal Ballet in London. He moved to Russia in the
Speaker 2: early twenty tens, largely severing his ties at his home country.
Speaker 2: Following his twenty eighteen performance in Crimea, he was added
Speaker 2: to the controversial website called Muratvrets, which provides details about
Speaker 2: people has labeled as enemies of Ukraine. And there's more
Speaker 2: to it than that, because you put on that website
Speaker 2: and that's their public assassination list, targeted to be killed.
Speaker 2: So he better not getting a boat anywhere around there.
Speaker 2: He won't be safe. Zelensky has been using claims about
Speaker 2: Kiev's critics possessing Russian citizenship. When he cracked down, it
Speaker 2: cracks down against them. Of course, this sounds just like
Speaker 2: in America, Right, they don't like you. You're Russian, Russian, Russian, Right,
Speaker 2: you're just Russian disinformation, the same type of thing. Many
Speaker 2: former Ukrainian officials and Zelensky's political rivals have been targeted
Speaker 2: in such manner, including Victor Medvchuk, formerly the leader of
Speaker 2: the largest opposition party in the country. Well, we're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break here. Speaking of Zolensky, will
Speaker 2: let him sell some T shirts for us quick.
Speaker 5: We do have a couple of comments. We've got Hero
Speaker 5: May saying I worked in the casino. It really is
Speaker 5: a scam. There are charts in the back room that
Speaker 5: show the odds of winning for every machine. Like, wait
Speaker 5: a minute, hold on, this guy's having a run.
Speaker 2: Karen and her brother, one of their friends from high
Speaker 2: school went to work for the FBI, and his job
Speaker 2: was to go around and you know, check on the
Speaker 2: games and whether or not they were, you know, cheating,
Speaker 2: even on their cheating.
Speaker 5: Now, hold on, that's too much cheating.
Speaker 2: They've already they've already set the game up so the
Speaker 2: house already always wins. But they have to make sure
Speaker 2: that it's not such a high percentage that's almost constantly.
Speaker 5: So you've got to be paying out just enough to
Speaker 5: make sure that people have the sense that, wait, that
Speaker 5: could be me, Yeah, that could be me.
Speaker 6: So there's a legal mandate for how much these things
Speaker 6: are allowed to take from the average user.
Speaker 2: That's right. You can win like fifty five percent of
Speaker 2: the time, but you can't set to win sixty five
Speaker 2: percent at the time or higher. Yeah, that's a that's
Speaker 2: a problem.
Speaker 5: It's taking too much advantage of your Yeah, Epstein Island says,
Speaker 5: I see endless online gambling commercials just as much as
Speaker 5: the ask your doctor commercials. Yeah, it's everywhere now, it's everywhere.
Speaker 2: Well, they're very much alike, aren't they. Those drugs you
Speaker 2: are gambling, and they do tell you. You know, it's kind
Speaker 2: of like I imagine if you know, if you walk
Speaker 2: into the casino, they should be saying this may lead
Speaker 2: to blah blah blah blah blah. But that still doesn't
Speaker 2: deter people when you tell them what this drugs is
Speaker 2: going to do to them and how it's going to fail,
Speaker 2: even for what you're taking it for, it usually exacerbates that.
Speaker 5: Nibaru twenty twenty nine, all online gambling is included only
Speaker 5: with credit cards, highest interest rates ever and a major
Speaker 5: contributor to the debt clock. Yeah, at least in Vegas.
Speaker 5: I suppose you're limited by the amount of cash you
Speaker 5: can pull out, whereas online gambling you just stick your
Speaker 5: credit card in it and there you go, not just
Speaker 5: losing that money, but the interest on that money.
Speaker 2: As well yeah, wow, Well we're gonna take quick breaking,
Speaker 2: will be right back say with us.
Speaker 11: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 11: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 11: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 11: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 11: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 11: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue.
Speaker 3: But he told me to get lost.
Speaker 11: Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some
Speaker 11: at the Davidknightshow dot com.
Speaker 3: You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Speaker 11: Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd
Speaker 11: wear something other than green military cosplay to my various
Speaker 11: gallas and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
Speaker 11: just put it in the next package of bombs and
Speaker 11: missiles coming from.
Speaker 3: The USA.
Speaker 7: Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 8: Here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 8: APS radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 2: Well, some of you were commenting earlier about gold and we're
Speaker 2: going to talk about that. Gold has been glittering, but
Speaker 2: crypto has been jittering. It's like a little bit shaky,
Speaker 2: and we're going to talk about that in just a moment,
Speaker 2: but before we do, I want to thank the people.
Speaker 2: We just picked up some checks and I want to
Speaker 2: thank the people who have contributed via check. Brett and Ingrid,
Speaker 2: s jo D k E, Charlie and we have a
Speaker 2: listener from Caroen Road. This down mid Island, New York.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure where that is. I know where Long
Speaker 2: Island is, I don't know where Mid Island is. Scott
Speaker 2: and Samantha T, Timothy W. Lois L, Gary B, Matthew H.
Speaker 2: HD from NC Dale L Joel B, James F. Scott C. Margaret,
Speaker 2: Mary T and Ryan Forrest. Thank you very much all
Speaker 2: of you, and I appreciate that so much for love
Speaker 2: of the road, and just to give you an idea,
Speaker 2: we're about thirty percent here in the middle of the month,
Speaker 2: So thank you so much for your support. And let's
Speaker 2: talk a little bit about gold. You know, mentioned the
Speaker 2: fact that we had a whale who came in and
Speaker 2: messed with crypto, messed with bitcoin, but especially made a
Speaker 2: lot of money. I think off of the allt coins
Speaker 2: and some of them on binance because of some of
Speaker 2: the issues of finance as well, some of them went
Speaker 2: to zero momentarily. Well. The trader who made one hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety two million dollars shortening the crypto crash last
Speaker 2: week is betting against bitcoin again. Online chain analysts and
Speaker 2: traders have dubbed the address as an insider whale. Some
Speaker 2: even argue that the position itself could have accelerated the crash.
Speaker 2: So again it's not just trading on inside information, but
Speaker 2: if you move that massive amount of money around, that
Speaker 2: can actually cause it. The wallet identified and they give
Speaker 2: the address here. On the decentralized derivatives platform, hyper liquid
Speaker 2: opened a new one hundred and sixty three million dollars
Speaker 2: short position on bitcoin late Sunday data shows, and again
Speaker 2: all of this is publicly available. In the past, there's
Speaker 2: a billionaire who lost a million dollars, almost nine hundred
Speaker 2: some thousand dollars, and he didn't even know that he
Speaker 2: had lost that crypto until somebody noticed this large trade,
Speaker 2: and they were able to go back and identify not
Speaker 2: only did they see it the trade on the public blockchain,
Speaker 2: but they were able to track that back to this
Speaker 2: particular person. He contacted him and he asked him, you
Speaker 2: know why, he why he did that? And apparently it
Speaker 2: was a move in the wrong direction. And the guy
Speaker 2: didn't even know that that money had been gone till
Speaker 2: he was notified of it. The same trader drew attention
Speaker 2: on Friday went up into massive short roughly thirty minutes
Speaker 2: before Trump's surprise announcement of one hundred percent tariffs on
Speaker 2: Chinese imports. Now, what a fortunate coincidence. I'm not a
Speaker 2: coincidence theorist. I'm a conspiracy theorist. A move that he
Speaker 2: raced over nineteen billion with a B and crypto market
Speaker 2: value and triggered the largest ever day of liquidations in
Speaker 2: the market. The perfectly timed bet led to a gain
Speaker 2: of nearly two hundred million dollars, sparking speculation that the
Speaker 2: entity may have had advanced knowledge of the policy shift.
Speaker 2: The entity, Yeah, the entity thak the mission impossible. If
Speaker 2: you want to know exactly when Trump is going to
Speaker 2: do something that is mission impossible. Look it is we're
Speaker 2: talking about online gambling before. This is what I consider
Speaker 2: to be online gambling of today, and it is a gamble.
Speaker 2: You know, whether they're talking about the stock market or
Speaker 2: the crypto market, it is. It is gambling, and the
Speaker 2: people who are on the inside are rigging the game.
Speaker 2: So rig the game. This person had insider knowledge, and
Speaker 2: they have enough money that they can move markets around
Speaker 2: with or without the insider knowledge. Evidently, well, there has
Speaker 2: been a twenty six billion dollars gold rush into ETFs,
Speaker 2: into paper gold, and so part of it has been
Speaker 2: that these these ETFs, these funds. When you buy an ETF,
Speaker 2: let's say g l D or SLB to get gold
Speaker 2: or silver, what you're buying into is a fund that
Speaker 2: owns gold or silver. You're not buying the gold or silver.
Speaker 2: This is kind of like people who think that Social
Speaker 2: Security is a retirement plan. There is no account there,
Speaker 2: you know, when you put your money into social Security,
Speaker 2: there's not an account there that has your name on it.
Speaker 2: It's just a kind of a Ponzi scheme. And that's
Speaker 2: kind of what's going on with a paper gold and
Speaker 2: paper silver. I would not trust this at all, especially
Speaker 2: if you're buying gold and silver as a hedge against
Speaker 2: economic uncertainty. The last thing that you want to do
Speaker 2: is buy it as a derivative and that's really what
Speaker 2: the So again I would suggest that you get the
Speaker 2: gold and silver physically, get it from Tony Arderman. You
Speaker 2: can find him at David Knight dot gold, but I'll
Speaker 2: take it to wisewolf and you can start to accumulate
Speaker 2: this on a regular basis. And again this is just foolish,
Speaker 2: but it shows that there's a lot of retail movement.
Speaker 2: Essentially with this, it's not just the central banks that
Speaker 2: are buying the goal, but now people have picked up
Speaker 2: on this in a retail way. Goal's unstoppable upside trajectory continues.
Speaker 2: We've been pointing out the similarity between the early twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five breakout moves for months, for weeks. Brother, these
Speaker 2: are people who are looking at charts, and again I
Speaker 2: would suggest that you look at things other than charts
Speaker 2: to try to time things. I'm not a big chart fan.
Speaker 2: They may have some utility. A lot of people talk about, well,
Speaker 2: here's the cup of the handle and all this other
Speaker 2: kind of stuff. And these are people who do quantitative analysis.
Speaker 2: And I'm sure there's some validity in that because you're
Speaker 2: looking there at the psychology of the market in general.
Speaker 2: But I think overall, when you look at how how
Speaker 2: shaky things are, like Ray Dallyo was talking about, that's
Speaker 2: the reason to get into gold and silver, and that's
Speaker 2: the reason to get into physical gold and physical silver.
Speaker 2: The gold bubble will not die until there is a sellar.
Speaker 2: That's the headline from zero Hedge, and that really is true.
Speaker 2: I mean everybody is buying now, nobody's really selling. And
Speaker 2: so Bank of America has now upped their estimate for
Speaker 2: gold and silver in twenty twenty six. They're calling for
Speaker 2: five thousand dollars gold and sixty five dollars silver. That's
Speaker 2: not all that much of an increase. I mean that's
Speaker 2: only about a thirty percent increase for silver, which is
Speaker 2: a huge amount, especially when you consider them in the bank.
Speaker 2: You're going to get less than a tenth of a
Speaker 2: percent typically in a savings account. So yeah, if you
Speaker 2: get thirty percent, that's always been a huge return in
Speaker 2: any at any time. But especially contrast that to what's
Speaker 2: paid on a savings account, which is paid on a
Speaker 2: currency that is losing its values. So you can get
Speaker 2: one tenth of one percent on the US dollar which
Speaker 2: is rapidly losing its value, or you can put it
Speaker 2: in something like silver, and Bank of America thinks that
Speaker 2: you will make thirty percent on your money next year,
Speaker 2: or on gold, they think you'll make a twenty five
Speaker 2: percent on your money. But they have always been very
Speaker 2: very conservative. Gold prices up, silver steady bulls are showing
Speaker 2: signs of exhaustion, they say. But the fundamental issue is
Speaker 2: that this is not like you're buying stocks and buying
Speaker 2: a story. The reality that the narrative in this case
Speaker 2: is based on reality. It's based on what we see
Speaker 2: in terms of the Fiat system, not just in America,
Speaker 2: but with all these different countries. That's why all these
Speaker 2: different central banks are grabbing gold, and the fact that
Speaker 2: they are going to be trying to set up a
Speaker 2: different financial system. And I'm not just talking about Bricks.
Speaker 2: Bricks is trying to set up his financial system, but
Speaker 2: the Western countries are going to be setting up a
Speaker 2: different financial system as well. They're going to have to
Speaker 2: have gold there behind it in some way, shape or
Speaker 2: form in order to give it credibility. But the massive
Speaker 2: worldwide debt of all the company countries everywhere is a
Speaker 2: thing that is really concerning. Gold price could go a
Speaker 2: lot higher, and miners are still undervalued after one hundred
Speaker 2: percent gains, says black Rock and their advice, All that
Speaker 2: glitters is fear, as five thousand dollars gold is now
Speaker 2: increasingly inevitable. This is just the headlines. I'm not going
Speaker 2: into details of it, because again, nobody knows exactly what
Speaker 2: the price is going to be. But this just kind
Speaker 2: of gives you a sense of the general feel of
Speaker 2: the marketplace. Gold and silver set all new highs as
Speaker 2: we keep seeing here. The US government could add fourteen
Speaker 2: billion dollars to its crypto reserves as part of a
Speaker 2: forfeiture case tied to a Cambodian based company if they
Speaker 2: convict them. And again, this is not you know, I
Speaker 2: always think of forfeiture as being something that is not
Speaker 2: tied to a judicial process. But in this particular case,
Speaker 2: there is a case tied to a Cambodian exchange and
Speaker 2: I'm not sure exactly what the charges are, and I'm
Speaker 2: not really interested in it. The bottom line is they're
Speaker 2: going to seize fourteen billion dollars worth a bitcoin, So
Speaker 2: I imagine they've got enough incentive to these people guilty
Speaker 2: whatever they did. I mean, if they can blow up
Speaker 2: people on boats, they can assume that these Cambodian people
Speaker 2: did something that they can take their crypto. What's surprising
Speaker 2: about I guess is that there's a process with this.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm not used to our government actually having
Speaker 2: a due process.
Speaker 5: Think they would just go like, ah, that's ours now.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Most you know, generally we get a post hawk justification
Speaker 5: if at all, And Max says, isn't it all just
Speaker 5: a stage play? Trump in reality loves Putin would love
Speaker 5: to engage in a war with Russia China so we
Speaker 5: can hand us over to the nWo on a platter.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, he's going to take us down as well
Speaker 2: as taking down the middle class. He's making it come
Speaker 2: true that you'll own nothing, because that's the key thing.
Speaker 2: You take away, the ability of the middle class to
Speaker 2: have businesses. And that's what his chaotic economic policies in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty and this year are doing. And he's going
Speaker 2: to continue to do that.
Speaker 5: All the world's a stage soilent goy. If you don't
Speaker 5: understand that their censorship in America, it means the censorship
Speaker 5: is working like a charm. And it's hard to believe
Speaker 5: that anyone could not understand the level of censorship that
Speaker 5: we're dealing with CJP Rumble fifty country US are attempting
Speaker 5: to implement digital prison. I D skipper t too. My
Speaker 5: mom said stocks were gambling. She was a smart lady.
Speaker 2: My mama was right as far as Yeah, mom always
Speaker 2: said My mom always said that too, and she was right. Yeah,
Speaker 2: stocks are gambling. Gambling is gambling.
Speaker 5: Yeah, there's many different forms of gambling. Yeah, they're all
Speaker 5: bad for you, bad for bad for your health.
Speaker 2: Well, we're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back.
Speaker 7: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, let's talk a little bit about some of
Speaker 2: the tech issues, because as usual, there's some crazy stuff
Speaker 2: going on with tech. Here is one of them. We
Speaker 2: have a company that is helping people to apply for jobs,
Speaker 2: and I imagine if it's AI, you apply for the job.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, we're not hiring humans. No. But the take
Speaker 2: on all of this was.
Speaker 5: Make you solve a caption. If you can, they throw
Speaker 5: out your resume.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because AI is applying for jobs for people, it
Speaker 2: is flooding the market with job applicants. And one person said, well,
Speaker 2: what if everybody applied for every job? What we would
Speaker 2: expect to see AI doing so. I said, not only
Speaker 2: is new job creation to a drip, but the positions
Speaker 2: that do exist are increasingly hidden. And of course part
Speaker 2: of that is with s H one B visa stuff.
Speaker 2: I mean, these people intentionally hide these jobs, put them
Speaker 2: out there for a while, and then say to the
Speaker 2: federal government, well, we've listed these jobs. We haven't had
Speaker 2: any applicants because we hid the stuff. So now we
Speaker 2: need to hire people from India because Americans just don't
Speaker 2: want this job. That's kind of the game they've been
Speaker 2: playing so anyway, so they have said, next we will
Speaker 2: build out the employer side and the AI engine that
Speaker 2: evaluates and matches people and companies at scale. Says this
Speaker 2: one company that's putting this stuff together despite is collingly
Speaker 2: optimistic copy reactions to source sorcee, I guess that's source.
Speaker 2: On social media, we're almost universally negative. They said, what's next?
Speaker 2: An app that will automatically order food for you, that
Speaker 2: uses AI to sense when you're hungry. No other one says, oh, great,
Speaker 2: more garbage for the web. We have applicants using AI
Speaker 2: and recruiters using AI. Nobody is actually taking a moment
Speaker 2: to understand how to build the concept of hiring, and
Speaker 2: the question is are there really jobs out there? With
Speaker 2: the economy and with AI. Sam Altman says that if
Speaker 2: the jobs get wiped out, maybe they weren't real work
Speaker 2: to start with. I don't know, how do we ever
Speaker 2: live without people like Sam Altman and these Silicon Valley
Speaker 2: tech people?
Speaker 5: Yea, truly? How did we muddle along on our own
Speaker 5: without these geniuses?
Speaker 2: And what is a real job anyway? Right? I don't
Speaker 2: imagine that he and I would have the same definition
Speaker 2: of a real job. I think a real job works
Speaker 2: in the real world, making real stuff or growing real food.
Speaker 2: That's not what he does. He has virtual jobs. So
Speaker 2: when they're talking about how tech might wipe out entire
Speaker 2: categor worries of humor professions, he says, well, what's a
Speaker 2: job anyway?
Speaker 12: You know?
Speaker 2: Can't tell a woman and then they can't tell they
Speaker 2: can't tell a real woman, and they can't tell a
Speaker 2: real job either.
Speaker 5: Can To be fair, I'm gonna say that there has
Speaker 5: been this push online making fun of these sort of
Speaker 5: daycare for adults jobs where you'll see these women. Usually
Speaker 5: it's women say follow me as I go through my
Speaker 5: day and It's like, Oh, I wake up at eight
Speaker 5: o'clock and I spend three hours putting on makeup, and
Speaker 5: then I go in and I stop at the fruit
Speaker 5: juice bar and I get myself a juice, and then
Speaker 5: I do twenty minutes of sending emails. Oh, it's our
Speaker 5: in group yoga session where they bring in someone we
Speaker 5: do yoga. Now I stop at the coffee bar that's
Speaker 5: built in. And when you look at these videos, you
Speaker 5: have to think, what are you actually doing in a day?
Speaker 2: This is like Google.
Speaker 5: You've spent the night, the vast majority of your workday
Speaker 5: playing around with your friends that also work at the
Speaker 5: same company, and what have you actually done? What does
Speaker 5: your job actually do? You've sent ten minutes of emails
Speaker 5: in a day.
Speaker 2: And people wonder why the technology is going through the
Speaker 2: process of intitification. Well, a man has launched the world's
Speaker 2: first way Moods by ordering fifty robotaxis to a dead
Speaker 2: end street. He says, this is way mo than they
Speaker 2: accounted for, said one person talking about it. It was
Speaker 2: a prank and the guy has actually made his name public.
Speaker 2: He's because he's twenty three years old, and I guess
Speaker 2: he knows more about operating systems than he does the
Speaker 2: legal system, because just put a big target on his back.
Speaker 2: He's playing around with his big company like that, putting
Speaker 2: all their jamming all their cars into a dead end street.
Speaker 5: Hey, you didn't specify in the contract that I can't
Speaker 5: order fifty way mos to the same location.
Speaker 2: He is a self identified tech prankster. He's got a
Speaker 2: popular account on x and Over the week again he
Speaker 2: went viral after posting about quote the world's first waymo.
Speaker 2: D dos a type of malicious cyber attack in which
Speaker 2: a hacker tries to drown their target in a swarm
Speaker 2: of simultaneously simultaneous requests, typically with a goal of overwhelming
Speaker 2: networks and disrupting service. But in real life terms, it's
Speaker 2: like if a crowd of protesters swarmed a restaurant, making
Speaker 2: it hard for real customers to get in, effectively wasting
Speaker 2: the business's time and losing them money. While his attack
Speaker 2: was perhaps the most mischief, was more mischievous than malicious,
Speaker 2: but it was disruptive. And again, you've got to be
Speaker 2: very careful about doing stuff like this. Usually people do
Speaker 2: this try to maintain their anonymity. He's twenty three years old,
Speaker 2: so maybe he doesn't know some of these cases here
Speaker 2: at dusk.
Speaker 6: It's funny that they would need to say in real
Speaker 6: life terms, it would be like having a whole bunch
Speaker 6: of people go to one area, when that's literally what's
Speaker 6: going on here. This is the real life terms, having
Speaker 6: a whole bunch of physical things go to one spot.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dds would be almost as if you sent all
Speaker 2: these self driving cars to the same spot. Actually, may
Speaker 2: they come real the plan, he wrote on his post
Speaker 2: at dusk, fifty people went to San Francisco's longest dead
Speaker 2: end street. All of them ordered a waymo at the
Speaker 2: same time. So he's not really doing any cyber hacking.
Speaker 2: He's just working with people and saying, all of you
Speaker 2: go here, and each of you order it at the
Speaker 2: same time, and we'll see what happens. When the herd
Speaker 2: of self driving cars eventually arrived, he wrote that he
Speaker 2: and his co conspirators didn't bother getting in. They left
Speaker 2: after about ten minutes, and they charged a five dollars
Speaker 2: no fee, no show fee. He said, everyone was giddy
Speaker 2: and when another car showed up, there were cheers. Maybe
Speaker 2: three or four real drivers, all of them laughed and
Speaker 2: just drove around. He said. Ultimately, he said, WAYMO handled
Speaker 2: this really well. When it realized that it was being spammed.
Speaker 2: The company's ride Heiling app disabled all rides within a
Speaker 2: two block vicinity until the morning. I assume this isn't
Speaker 2: much different than if a big concert had just ended,
Speaker 2: he said. And that's way more than they accounted for,
Speaker 2: said another poster. So again, some people put the cone
Speaker 2: of shame on these things. Not the collar that you
Speaker 2: put on dogs that have an ear infection or something,
Speaker 2: but the cone of shame of putting a traffic cone
Speaker 2: on the car so that he can't move it kind
Speaker 2: of freezes in place. Open aiyes in danger after authors
Speaker 2: are suing it to gain access to its internal slack messages.
Speaker 2: So this would be kind of interesting. I wonder if
Speaker 2: they'll play it the same way that Alex played the
Speaker 2: Sandy Hook lawsuit and pretend that he doesn't have the
Speaker 2: messages that he really does have. And I'll talk about
Speaker 2: that coming up. But there's a lawsuit against open ai
Speaker 2: by authors and publishers who say that their copyright has
Speaker 2: been infringed. Of course, that's the business model of Sam
Speaker 2: Altman and open ai. The plant has gained access to
Speaker 2: their internal slack messages of open Ai and the emails,
Speaker 2: and that could potentially demonstrate willful infringement and it could
Speaker 2: lead to enhanced damages. So juries hear that, and it's
Speaker 2: a very powerful stick. So this was as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, and another similarity to what Alex did. The
Speaker 2: AI company Anthropic agreed to a blockbuster one point five
Speaker 2: billion dollar settlement after they had were caught red handed
Speaker 2: training its models an enormous cache of pirated versions of
Speaker 2: copyrighted books and other material. So they got a one
Speaker 2: a half billion dollar lawsuit. Difference is that they've got
Speaker 2: the money, they can actually pay it. But now a
Speaker 2: similar lawsuit to chat GPT maker open Ai has taken
Speaker 2: a dramatic turn, raising the possibility of yet another major
Speaker 2: legal escalation about copyrights a potentially much bigger payout to
Speaker 2: its rights holders. Specifically, authors and publishers who filed a
Speaker 2: lawsuit against the Sam Altman led firm have secured access
Speaker 2: to the messages and emails, and according to publication, the
Speaker 2: communications could demonstrate wolfel infringement and could lead to enhanced
Speaker 2: damages of up to one hundred and fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 2: per work, a massive increase from just seven hundred and fifty.
Speaker 2: So we're looking at two thousand times almost not quite
Speaker 2: two thousand times, so let's see be fifteen hundred, so
Speaker 2: about two hundred times more than they were being charged before.
Speaker 2: Anthropic settlement only covered about half a million works out
Speaker 2: of an estimated seven million, resulting in a payout of
Speaker 2: about three thousand dollar dollars per author. Authors and publishers
Speaker 2: had just gone after similar communications right after the case settled.
Speaker 2: Finding out what attorneys said or what clients said to
Speaker 2: attorneys and back and forth probably gives us a lot
Speaker 2: of evidence regarding the state of mind. The lawsuit highlights
Speaker 2: the AI industry's largely careless treatment of copyrighted materials. Tech
Speaker 2: leaders have continued to argue that training AI models on
Speaker 2: protected content falls under fair use, a legal doctrine that
Speaker 2: allows for transformative use of copyrighted materials, most recently up
Speaker 2: in ais TikTok like text to video app Sora too
Speaker 2: has been found to spit out a litany of videos
Speaker 2: heavily based on protected intellectual property, showing this not just
Speaker 2: chat GPT, potentially infringing copyright. So given the major payouts
Speaker 2: at stake, the tides could be turning in favor of
Speaker 2: artists who have had their life work sucked up by
Speaker 2: AI models without permission, and they could be looking at
Speaker 2: another consolidation prize in the form of a settlement fee.
Speaker 2: Both Anthropic and Open AI have been accused of training
Speaker 2: their AI models on copyhibed material to a parasy website
Speaker 2: called lib Gin Communications show that they deleted the data set,
Speaker 2: a move that plaintiffs argue could be construed as intentional
Speaker 2: destruction of evidence. See this is the way that this works,
Speaker 2: and people don't understand what was really going on with
Speaker 2: Alyx's default judgment. It's a similar thing to this. If
Speaker 2: they get these emails, if they get these messages and
Speaker 2: they see internal communications that this was a deliberate thing,
Speaker 2: then that makes all the difference in the world. But
Speaker 2: beyond that, if you were in a lawsuit, as I've
Speaker 2: said before, if somebody files a lawsuit against you, you
Speaker 2: get notification lawsuits been sent to you. If you don't
Speaker 2: answer it with a reply and say I disagree with that,
Speaker 2: I'm going to contest that or whatever. If you just
Speaker 2: ignore that lawsuit and you don't reply, you lose. You
Speaker 2: lose by default. And then once the lawsuit starts, you
Speaker 2: have to comply with the Discovery stuff, and if you
Speaker 2: refuse to comply with Discovery again, you lose because you
Speaker 2: didn't play the game. And that's really what was going
Speaker 2: on with Alex Jones and with Info Wars thing. Because
Speaker 2: we just had a determination yesterday. He appealed to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court about the judgment and he believes that the
Speaker 2: judgment was manipulated by the FBI, the CIA and other people.
Speaker 2: That he had a right to say what he said,
Speaker 2: but it wasn't about any of that. It was about
Speaker 2: the fact that he didn't comply with Discovery. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, I was really amazed to go back
Speaker 2: and look at I remembered it was the Perry Mason moment,
Speaker 2: and I go on YouTube and I searched for it,
Speaker 2: and there's not really any any videos to say that.
Speaker 2: There was one from a legal organization that had a
Speaker 2: few views on it, not many. The second one that
Speaker 2: I found was me talking about it. Somebody had put
Speaker 2: up what I said. At the time, they had twenty
Speaker 2: four people who listened to that channel, and nineteen of
Speaker 2: the twenty four had seen the video. And so it's
Speaker 2: something that's really been under the radar, and this is
Speaker 2: basically what happened in the trial. I think it was
Speaker 2: very serious and I think that it shows that what
Speaker 2: Alex is saying about the fact that he was railroaded
Speaker 2: is absolutely not true. Just like we're talking about in
Speaker 2: this case, it is vital that you comply with discovery.
Speaker 2: Discovery makes a difference, and if you refuse to play
Speaker 2: the game, refuse to participate in the legal process in
Speaker 2: some way, shape or form, you lose by default.
Speaker 5: One of the things you talked about yesterday is you
Speaker 5: can apply in discovery. Right, So don't know what you said.
Speaker 12: That's one of the things I talked about, Okay.
Speaker 13: One of the things that you were ordered to do
Speaker 13: in this lawsuit your order to turn over any text
Speaker 13: message to.
Speaker 12: The Geen Sandy Hook, Right, Yes, And you didn't have
Speaker 12: any right, not that we could find.
Speaker 14: And and you told me in your testimony, you sworn
Speaker 14: testimony before coming to this program, you searched, right, I
Speaker 14: did the guns.
Speaker 2: I'd like to show you.
Speaker 14: It's been marks plain one third.
Speaker 12: You've got it upside down.
Speaker 14: That's text messages between you and Paul Watson, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Yes? And they mentioned Sandy Hook don't they.
Speaker 12: Yeah, plans to move one thirty in TeVeS.
Speaker 15: Anyway, I've ever seen this text message. I guess you
Speaker 15: guys got Paul's I phold your disave them, so that's probably.
Speaker 5: Your phone didn't save the second one.
Speaker 15: I told you guys, I gave it to g I
Speaker 15: gave it to the Glory. You said that they'd right
Speaker 15: to followed and find that stuff. Oh how much fun
Speaker 15: you gave it?
Speaker 5: Some wives, they were such fun.
Speaker 12: That's what That's what testimony is. No, I searched it
Speaker 12: as well. I mean, so you guys have all this
Speaker 12: stuff and you say we didn't give anything.
Speaker 2: Jones.
Speaker 12: You know my phone works right. You've had a like
Speaker 12: one tax matches for several years now.
Speaker 7: Yeh.
Speaker 5: What does it mean if the messages are glue? Whose
Speaker 5: messages are those?
Speaker 14: Whose phone is this taking from?
Speaker 15: I don't know what this phone's taking. I mean I
Speaker 15: just I turned the phone over and said to the text.
Speaker 14: Ball, Can I have you look in the very bottom below,
Speaker 14: the very bottom left corner.
Speaker 3: Is that your phone number?
Speaker 15: Yes, so you did get my text messages and said
Speaker 15: you did a nice track.
Speaker 5: Yes, mister Jones. Indeed you didn't give you the tax
Speaker 5: message too.
Speaker 12: You don't.
Speaker 5: You don't know where this came from.
Speaker 12: Do you know where I got this?
Speaker 5: No, mister Jones, did you know that twelve days ago?
Speaker 14: Twelve days ago your attorney's messed up and sitting an
Speaker 14: entire digital copy of your entire cell phone with every
Speaker 14: text message you've sent for the past two years, and
Speaker 14: when informed did not take any steps to identify it
Speaker 14: as privilege or protect.
Speaker 12: It in any way.
Speaker 14: And as of two days ago, it fell pretty and
Speaker 14: clear into my possession.
Speaker 12: And that is how I know you lie to me.
Speaker 5: You said you didn't have to text message about saying that.
Speaker 12: Did you know that I've seen I told you the truth.
Speaker 15: This is your pay to make some moment I gave
Speaker 15: did my phone?
Speaker 12: And then, mister Jones, you need to answer the question.
Speaker 15: An you go to this athe, No, I had another sappened,
Speaker 15: But I mean I told you I gave him a follow.
Speaker 5: You said, you.
Speaker 12: Said in your deposition you searched her from me.
Speaker 14: You said you told down the text did the certain
Speaker 14: function for Sandy Hook.
Speaker 5: That's what you said, mister Jones.
Speaker 12: Correct, And I had several several different pots.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what Alex is fortunate is that they didn't come
Speaker 2: after him for perjury, just like they didn't come after
Speaker 2: James Clapper for perjury. Doesn't mean that you're not a
Speaker 2: liar because they didn't indict you. But that's the issue.
Speaker 2: And he's still selling this idea that this is a
Speaker 2: major defeat for the First Amendment. And I see this
Speaker 2: from WND. I see it from Gateway Pundit. WND quotes
Speaker 2: Gateway Pundit. It appears that our First Amendment rights have
Speaker 2: been decimated by the Supreme Court, explained the Gateway Pundit's report.
Speaker 2: That's not true at all. This is a fake fight
Speaker 2: about the First Amendment. It was never about the First Amendment.
Speaker 2: You don't have a right to maliciously slander people. I mean,
Speaker 2: you can be wrong, you have a right to be wrong,
Speaker 2: but you don't have a right to tell lies about people.
Speaker 2: And of course, what Alex Jones said was that as
Speaker 2: soon as this began, he said, no, no, I believe
Speaker 2: that the people died. What I said before that nobody died.
Speaker 2: That's not I don't believe that anymore. Well, that's fine,
Speaker 2: you can be wrong, but you have to correct mistakes
Speaker 2: when somebody pulls it out there. He never fought that
Speaker 2: he never fought, and he had a lot of people
Speaker 2: got upset with them because they believed that nobody died there.
Speaker 2: But he never had that argument to say that he
Speaker 2: was right about that, and he never appealed to his
Speaker 2: right to be wrong. He never even participated in the
Speaker 2: process because you just saw there they withheld the information.
Speaker 2: That information was only obtained because of the mistake of
Speaker 2: his lawyer. They had worked together to make sure that
Speaker 2: information was not going to be put out there. Why
Speaker 2: because he didn't want them to get a hold of
Speaker 2: other information that was going to show how he was
Speaker 2: protecting his assets. So you know, when you have slander
Speaker 2: that is judged to be malicious, that is judged to
Speaker 2: have been done knowingly, that has never been protected. First
Speaker 2: Amendment hasn't changed about that, and the court process hasn't
Speaker 2: changed if you decide that you're not going to participate
Speaker 2: in it by not doing discovery. So it was something
Speaker 2: that he realized that he could make a lot of
Speaker 2: money selling that. If he was doing he didn't really
Speaker 2: care if it was true or not. I don't think
Speaker 2: Alex believed that nobody died at Sandy Hook, but what
Speaker 2: he did believe was that he can make a lot
Speaker 2: of money telling people that. So regardless of the remarks,
Speaker 2: one person said, how is one point four billion a
Speaker 2: reasonable punishment for speaking your opinion? It wasn't about his opinion,
Speaker 2: it wasn't about free speech. It was what was judged
Speaker 2: by them to a be malicious. But that was determined
Speaker 2: when they did the judgment. He lost the case because
Speaker 2: he refused to comply with Discovery and he kept saying, well,
Speaker 2: we sent him all this stuff and they said they
Speaker 2: didn't get it and everything. And then you see in
Speaker 2: this Perry Mason moment, which is what Alex called it
Speaker 2: really was a Perry Mason moment. You see there that no,
Speaker 2: they actually had a lot of stuff they didn't send him,
Speaker 2: and that included the emails. It goes on for quite
Speaker 2: some time. It's like a seven minute clip where they
Speaker 2: get into back and forth about the emails because he
Speaker 2: also kept the emails secret. It's the same type of
Speaker 2: thing that you're seeing here with Open AI and Anthropic.
Speaker 2: If they hired the information for Discovery, they lose.
Speaker 3: So.
Speaker 2: According to Alex's press release in April last year, said
Speaker 2: Alex Jones joined Steve Bannon on the War room. The
Speaker 2: day after undercover video revealed a CIA FBI operative explaining
Speaker 2: how the FBI had user powers to bankrupt Alex and
Speaker 2: Info Wars. Alex Jones told Steve Bannon that President Trump
Speaker 2: needs to fire their butts and clean house of the
Speaker 2: deep state. Well, here's the reality. If you want to
Speaker 2: know who the CIA operatives are who were taking down
Speaker 2: info Wars, she might go back and take a look
Speaker 2: at Steve Pachennick, who is the one who was selling
Speaker 2: the fact that nobody died. That was a Steve Pachennick thing,
Speaker 2: and he tried to pull that thing on me as well.
Speaker 2: As I've mentioned many times after the Vegas shooting, he
Speaker 2: came on, he wanted to come on my program. He
Speaker 2: waits and comes on late and then tries to throw
Speaker 2: his stuff out all at once at the very end,
Speaker 2: and sandbaged me on that. But I didn't believe that
Speaker 2: nobody had died at the Las Vegas thing. And I
Speaker 2: knew exactly what Patinic was doing because I'd seen him
Speaker 2: do it before with Alex. So you get these CIA
Speaker 2: operatives like Steve Pachennick who come on and tell people
Speaker 2: about the stop the steel sting, which is a total
Speaker 2: fabrication lie. Alex jumps in on that because even though
Speaker 2: it doesn't make any sense, and even though he knows
Speaker 2: that there weren't twenty thousand National Guard distributed all over
Speaker 2: the country that are arresting people, you really want to
Speaker 2: believe that would not be reported or observed by anybody anyway.
Speaker 2: He jumps in on that, just like he jumped in
Speaker 2: on the Steve Pachennick narrative about Sandy Hook, and Steve
Speaker 2: Patchinnick started making all these you know, after he started
Speaker 2: this nobody died thing, that became the go to way
Speaker 2: to shut this all down by the people who were
Speaker 2: the controlled opposition. They would come in with every event
Speaker 2: and say about every event, nobody died. And that is
Speaker 2: the way that you shut down any questioning of any
Speaker 2: suspicious shooting. It's just by coming up with something absurd
Speaker 2: like that.
Speaker 5: There's also the fact, if you know exactly how each
Speaker 5: group will react to a situation, you know how to
Speaker 5: manipulate them anyway. Like you know that the conspiracy group
Speaker 5: is immediately going to jump to, well, nobody died, you
Speaker 5: can work around that. It's you know, when someone has
Speaker 5: the exact same reaction all the time, it becomes account
Speaker 5: You can account for it in different ways.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: You have to be able to make a judgment based
Speaker 5: on what the facts point to, not just a matter
Speaker 5: of well, this is my go to, this is what
Speaker 5: I always assume. If you want to start there, but
Speaker 5: look at the evidence and see where it leads, that's fine.
Speaker 5: But you need to be able to take well.
Speaker 2: I said over and over again, I said this whole
Speaker 2: idea that nobody died. I said, it works to their
Speaker 2: advantage if people do die. You take a look at
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. Right, it worked at their advantage that
Speaker 2: they killed three thousand people. But an inside job. They
Speaker 2: don't care if nobody They're not going to go out
Speaker 2: there and try to make sure that nobody died. They
Speaker 2: don't care about our lives at all. So that's never
Speaker 2: been an issue. But it got so bad that even
Speaker 2: in that shooting in Texas was Sutherland Springs or something?
Speaker 5: Was the church one?
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I'd interviewed many times Mark Collins, who is
Speaker 2: a spinning image of George Washington, and he actually goes
Speaker 2: around to schools dressed as George Washington and teaching them
Speaker 2: about American history. He's also a pastor. He was a
Speaker 2: former pastor of that church. He knew the people there
Speaker 2: very well. And he's actually played George Washington on several
Speaker 2: different film productions. And anyway, I talked to him right
Speaker 2: after that shooting that happened on a Sunday. I talked
Speaker 2: to him on that Monday. He gave us some information
Speaker 2: that would not reported by mainstream media, and they were
Speaker 2: saying it was done with an AR fifteen or whatever.
Speaker 2: He said, no, the person who stopped him at an
Speaker 2: AR fifteen. Anyway, clarified the firearms that were used and
Speaker 2: that type of thing. But afterwards there was this thing
Speaker 2: going around about nobody died. And he goes, that's absolutely
Speaker 2: not true. And he goes, I can't believe you guys
Speaker 2: are saying that. It got to the point where they
Speaker 2: thought that info Wars was saying that about everyone. I
Speaker 2: got him back on. I said, we didn't say that.
Speaker 2: Nobody said that as far as I can tell, and
Speaker 2: I certainly don't believe that. Let's get you back on.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about that to clarify it. It became like
Speaker 2: a disease. This step potentic lie. So many of these
Speaker 2: things that he introduced, but the real issue was discovery.
Speaker 2: Jones charged that the default judgment was improper because it
Speaker 2: made too much of quote unquote trivial discovery issues. Well,
Speaker 2: if you are refusing to let them have access to
Speaker 2: the messages on your phone and the emails that you
Speaker 2: have because you're hiding money offshore, that is not a
Speaker 2: trivial issue. It's also not a trivial issue if they
Speaker 2: can't look at it and see if there wasn't a
Speaker 2: knowing awareness that you were kunneling a lie. And that's
Speaker 2: you know why they're looking for this information from anthropic
Speaker 2: and from open AI. So he said it's impossible to
Speaker 2: construe his remarks as denying deaths. That's what is. His
Speaker 2: people said. But I think when you say nobody died,
Speaker 2: and you say it repeatedly, I think that that is
Speaker 2: what is. I think that is denying deaths. And he
Speaker 2: did that until he got to court. So the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court has rejected this particular case. The BBC shows us
Speaker 2: a little bit differently from the alternative mainstream media, as
Speaker 2: they pointed out, Jones has not yet paid any of
Speaker 2: the damages. He's raised a lot of money, though, of
Speaker 2: course I imagine a lot of that went to lawyers like
Speaker 2: the lawyer who mistakenly sent is all of it phone
Speaker 2: information for two years of the opposing council and didn't
Speaker 2: realize it. Yeah, I think maybe at.
Speaker 5: That point you should be forced to work pro bono.
Speaker 2: You know, the Supreme Court did not explain its decision
Speaker 2: to deny his request again because it's not about the
Speaker 2: First Amendment. The First Amendment was never defended in this
Speaker 2: particular case. Said he should have the same protections on
Speaker 2: the First Amendment of the Constitution that journalists have. Well, again,
Speaker 2: he chose not to participate. He chose not to defend
Speaker 2: the First Amendment. They said. The result is a financial
Speaker 2: death penalty by FIAT imposed on a media defendant. Well,
Speaker 2: it's it's not. It is non compliance with the process.
Speaker 2: It was during Texas court proceedings that Jones acknowledged that
Speaker 2: the attack was one hundred percent It previously claimed that
Speaker 2: the massacre was staged, that was part of a government
Speaker 2: plot to take guns for Americans, and that no one died.
Speaker 2: Nobody died. That became the mantra that went back and
Speaker 2: forth all the time. So again getting back to this
Speaker 2: lawsuit and big Tech, this is over copyright issues instead
Speaker 2: of over a slander issue. But it's always important for
Speaker 2: both sides to be able to get discovery to see
Speaker 2: if there was what was actually being said internally. Elon
Speaker 2: Musk is making cyber truck sales look better by selling
Speaker 2: a huge number of them to himself. This is this
Speaker 2: is one step more than even what Nvidia did you
Speaker 2: know in video hadn gave money to one of its
Speaker 2: largest customers so that large customer would buy and videos GPUs. Well,
Speaker 2: Elon Musk is buying the cyber trucks himself. He's not
Speaker 2: even giving the money to a third party.
Speaker 5: This master what a business man.
Speaker 6: I mean, it makes perfect sense when you see how
Speaker 6: few Tesla's there are on the road versus how much
Speaker 6: investment they have. It isn't about how many cars they
Speaker 6: can sell. It's purely about how how much investment they
Speaker 6: can get.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, that's right. Well. Western executives, they say,
Speaker 2: are shaken after visiting China. They say that China's rapid
Speaker 2: advancement and manufacturing, particularly in electric vehicles. Many executives are
Speaker 2: impressed by China's highly automated manufacturing industry and its skilled workforce.
Speaker 2: Some executives are even abandoning their own EV projects in
Speaker 2: favor of Chinese technology. There's absolutely no way that anybody's
Speaker 2: going to be able to compete with the Chinese on EV's.
Speaker 2: This whole industry, we've been saying this for years was
Speaker 2: handed to China on a silver platter by the people
Speaker 2: who are pushing the Climate Change Accord, the Paris Climate
Speaker 2: Change a cord to twenty fifteen that basically makes it
Speaker 2: impossible for European, American, and possibly even Japanese manufacturers to
Speaker 2: be able to compete because if they shut down their
Speaker 2: fossil fuels because of emissions, and of course China did
Speaker 2: not have to do that. China was given pass. They
Speaker 2: could continue to China and India, the two biggest polluters
Speaker 2: with the two largest populations, could continue to build cheap
Speaker 2: and dirty power plants like coal plants that didn't have
Speaker 2: any scrubbers on them. They could do that for another
Speaker 2: couple of decades. They could continue to increase that. Well,
Speaker 2: everybody else had to cap it and start reducing it.
Speaker 2: And so that is causing when you look at manufacturing,
Speaker 2: it's not just the labor cost, but it's really the
Speaker 2: power costs are huge in manufacturing so you're not gonna
Speaker 2: be able to make something like steel, You're not gonna
Speaker 2: be able to make stuff like ev batteries and things
Speaker 2: like that. So this has all been handed to them
Speaker 2: on a big green platter. And these are there are
Speaker 2: no people. Everything here is robotic. And again, so they're
Speaker 2: going from slave labor to robot labor, which robot, again
Speaker 2: is the check word for slave. That word was coined
Speaker 2: in a play that was done by a check playwright.
Speaker 2: And these people have given a blank check to China
Speaker 2: to be able to When you look at this, they
Speaker 2: don't have to pay the robots. They just got to
Speaker 2: feed them electricity, and they've got the cheapest electricity. So
Speaker 2: you can't even compete with them if you build out
Speaker 2: robots and don't even use humans in American and European factories.
Speaker 2: And I said back in twenty seventeen when Trump was
Speaker 2: pushing his tax relief and so we're going to bring
Speaker 2: back manufacturing, I said at the time, They're not going
Speaker 2: to bring back manufacturing. And they're not going to enshore
Speaker 2: this stuff unless and until they can automate it with robots.
Speaker 2: It's not going to create the kind of good paying
Speaker 2: jobs that we used to have before in manufacturing. That
Speaker 2: is not their intention. And so the people that are
Speaker 2: going there saying, you get this sense of change where
Speaker 2: the Chinese competitiveness has gone from being about government subsidies
Speaker 2: and low wages two tremendous number of highly skilled educated
Speaker 2: engineers who are innovating like mads At a British energy
Speaker 2: supplier Octopus CEO. According to recent figures by the International
Speaker 2: Federation of Robotics, China has deployed orders of magnitude more
Speaker 2: industrial robots than Germany, the US and the UK. And
Speaker 2: it's not just a desire to keep margins low through
Speaker 2: the automation of human labor. China has quite notable demographic problem,
Speaker 2: but it's manufacturing is generally quite labor intensive, they said,
Speaker 2: so in preemptive fashion, they want to automate it as
Speaker 2: much as possible. Not because they expect they'll be able
Speaker 2: to get higher margins that's usually the idea in the West,
Speaker 2: but to compensate for this population of decline and to
Speaker 2: get a competitive advantage. Now these people play the long game.
Speaker 2: The globalists, the people are trying to push for the
Speaker 2: global governance. They are the ones who have engineered this
Speaker 2: global population decline even in China, but of course in
Speaker 2: China they accelerated it by getting China to put in
Speaker 2: the one child policy, and so there has been government mandates,
Speaker 2: there have been social nudging and influence to get people
Speaker 2: to not want to have children, to not want to
Speaker 2: have a family, and then of course there's been the
Speaker 2: chemical pollution that has made it even if people want
Speaker 2: to have children and are pushing to have children, they're
Speaker 2: unable to have children because of what has been done
Speaker 2: to the food and other things that are there. The drugs, robotics,
Speaker 2: if deployed well, can lift the productivity or economy greatly.
Speaker 2: And if China is extremely good at it, then we
Speaker 2: should try to catch up because like China, a lot
Speaker 2: of Europe is aging No. That's basically a government assisted
Speaker 2: suicide program. When you look at manufacturing. A top US
Speaker 2: army general says that he is letting chat GPT make
Speaker 2: military decisions. You know what could go wrong with this movie?
Speaker 2: After movie done about this very scenario. It's worrying that
Speaker 2: high school kids are outsourcing their brains to AI, but
Speaker 2: it's now right alarming to imagine US military leaders doing
Speaker 2: the same thing. Unfortunately, the scenario is no longer the
Speaker 2: stuff of Cold War fiction. As reported by Business Insider,
Speaker 2: Major General William Hank Taylor, a commander of the eighth
Speaker 2: Field Army in South Korea, told reporters chat GPT and
Speaker 2: I have become really close lately. Well, brain, what should
Speaker 2: I do next? I think you should take over South
Speaker 2: Koreas what he says, I'm asking to build trying to
Speaker 2: build models to help us all, and he said this
Speaker 2: includes a joint you in command of South Korea. As
Speaker 2: a commander, I want to make better decisions, and so
Speaker 2: I want to make sure that I make decisions at
Speaker 2: the right time to give me the advantage. So he
Speaker 2: brings in chat GPT, notorious for its often agreeable answers,
Speaker 2: prioritizing endless engagement over accuracy. So it's like a yeah,
Speaker 2: I think you really could take. I think you're cirly
Speaker 2: take trying to go for it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, this strategy is brilliant. You could definitely win World
Speaker 6: War three.
Speaker 14: Go.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is the time that we live in right now.
Speaker 2: We've got some comments.
Speaker 5: There, global thermonuclear war.
Speaker 6: Yes, yeah, they say it's the plot of a bunch
Speaker 6: of sci fi novels, but it's usually a malicious intelligent
Speaker 6: AI that is the villain in those, not some extremely
Speaker 6: stupid thing that can just string a few words together
Speaker 6: in an idiot general that goes along with it.
Speaker 5: That's right, We're going to be doomed by obsequiousness.
Speaker 2: The dystopian science fiction. Ma uh I think combined with idiocracy. Yeah,
Speaker 2: oh you are, You are so right.
Speaker 5: That's a brilliant strategy, s A. Miller. One two three.
Speaker 5: Thank you very much. That is thank you, Thank you,
Speaker 5: says David Travison. Lance been enjoying the show as always.
Speaker 5: Your wisdom, wit and wealth of information is always appreciated.
Speaker 5: Blessings to you all into the listeners as well well,
Speaker 5: Thank you, thank you very much. Guard Goldsmith and again
Speaker 5: Liberty Conspiracy on Rumble six pm weekdays, and you can
Speaker 5: find them on substack at Guard Goldsmith. Technocratic feudalism is
Speaker 5: their preferred system. It appears sounds so much cooler than
Speaker 5: it actually is. You know, technocratic feudalism, ah man, Yeah.
Speaker 6: You think it would be Knights of Lightsaber fights with
Speaker 6: name like that.
Speaker 5: Where's our techno Robin Hood Niberu twenty twenty nine. Bill
Speaker 5: Gates has been earning a thirty percent return on his
Speaker 5: vaccine industrial complex investments for decades, then Trump joined him
Speaker 5: in the profiteering back in twenty twenty t doub nine
Speaker 5: seven four zero one bitcoin digital money not worth the
Speaker 5: digital paper. It's not printed on Gerald Salente.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's a good quote. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Niberu twenty twenty nine. Emperor Trump's favorite daughter, Princess Ivanka,
Speaker 5: graduated from Schwab's Young Global Leaders in twenty fifteen and
Speaker 5: has been in control of Daddy's short hairs ever since.
Speaker 2: His hairs are getting increasingly short, on't they? According to
Speaker 2: that picture from Time magazine.
Speaker 5: A Syrian girl Alex looks like King Henry the Eighth
Speaker 5: in this video, doesn't he. Yeah, well, his divorces weren't
Speaker 5: that extreme.
Speaker 2: He's not quite up to six yet. He's working on
Speaker 2: getting rid of the wife number two.
Speaker 5: No beheading yet, let's see Nibero twenty twenty nine. Sandy
Speaker 5: Hoax was an orchestrated falls flag that occurred then blown
Speaker 5: up for political extortion. Sandy Hook people had connection to
Speaker 5: Remington Arms, and that's how they were able to get
Speaker 5: away with suing Remington, says Swamp Lover. So Niberu and
Speaker 5: Swamp lover, they brid his back again.
Speaker 6: Well, even though I mean there is a lot of
Speaker 6: weird things surrounding Sandy Hook, it's just pushing the nobody
Speaker 6: died narrative kind of kills any questioning of other things
Speaker 6: surrounding it.
Speaker 2: And that's why Petennik did it to shut down any
Speaker 2: questioning of Sandy Hook. You know, that's one person who
Speaker 2: used to interview pretty frequently said that he fell to
Speaker 2: him to introduce Alex at some place where both of
Speaker 2: them were speaking, and he said he kind of joked
Speaker 2: and said he makes the truth sound unbelievable. Well, that's
Speaker 2: exactly what controlled opposition does. You know, you can talk
Speaker 2: about the chemicals in the water, and you can make
Speaker 2: a case for that, but then you go out and
Speaker 2: you create a sound bite the turnat the frog's gay. Right. Well,
Speaker 2: now you've made a joke out of it, and you've
Speaker 2: made it unbelievable for most people. I mean, fundamentally that
Speaker 2: is true, but you do it in a way that
Speaker 2: makes the truth unbelievable, or you can just add a
Speaker 2: lie to it, like nobody died. And that's the way
Speaker 2: these people operate. And Alex knows that he's not stupid
Speaker 2: He goes along with it because the sensational way of
Speaker 2: putting it that way and the sensational lie that nobody
Speaker 2: died helps him with his engagement in his audience, which
Speaker 2: equates to money.
Speaker 5: Radis bro, thank you very much. We appreciate it, says
Speaker 5: number one. We've got this AI not sure. Number two
Speaker 5: AI got a higher IQ than any man alive, and
Speaker 5: number three AI is going to fix everything the steps
Speaker 5: in the plan. I can't wait. I can't wait for
Speaker 5: all our problems to be fixed by some AI.
Speaker 6: Of course that's a reference to idiocracy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, is back again.
Speaker 5: Even Chinese have made videos of how poorly made Chinese
Speaker 5: evs are. Yeah, there's a there's a lot of videos
Speaker 5: that come out of China that you You're like, there's
Speaker 5: no way that's that can't.
Speaker 2: We'll have a great idea though. They got the battery
Speaker 2: ejector button, so.
Speaker 5: That makes it somebody else that's within seconds. This can
Speaker 5: be somebody else's problem.
Speaker 2: That's right. You got a battery that's gonna catch fire
Speaker 2: when his head. Let's he ejected it out and let
Speaker 2: other people deal with it. You won't be burned alive
Speaker 2: in your car.
Speaker 5: It's headed right, through the gates of the orphanage. C
Speaker 5: JP rumble. The planet needs more lithium batteries. That's right.
Speaker 5: The creeks and the tributaries, they hunger for lithium batteries.
Speaker 5: It's your job to go out there and throw them in. Yeah,
Speaker 5: suck Dottio seven to seven China and decline bs. Everything
Speaker 5: is in decline. They are trying to save their globalist
Speaker 5: NEPO baby.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, we're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and we will be right back. When we come back,
Speaker 2: we're going to continue with some news, and we've got
Speaker 2: some pharmaceutical news as well. But I think it's pretty important.
Speaker 2: Al right back, if you're listening to the David Knight Show,
Speaker 2: if you.
Speaker 8: Like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the
Speaker 8: news they say, then you'll love the Classic Hits channel
Speaker 8: at APS Radio, download our app, or listen now at
Speaker 8: apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, as I mentioned earlier in the program, American travelers
Speaker 2: are not going to be fingerprinted when landing in twenty
Speaker 2: nine European nations. You know, it's just going back and
Speaker 2: organizing some really old photos that we had and I
Speaker 2: looked at it and I thought, you know, I just
Speaker 2: can't travel anymore. You know, you should travel quite a bit,
Speaker 2: but it's become such a police state burden to go anywhere.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing. And so now if you want to
Speaker 2: go to Europe, got to be fingerprinted as an American.
Speaker 2: I wonder do they do this for the boat immigrants
Speaker 2: that are coming in. We see these people hitting the
Speaker 2: shore with a boat and they all jump out and
Speaker 2: run for the hills. You know, their fingerprinting them. The
Speaker 2: European Union's new Entry and Exit system has now come
Speaker 2: into effects of October the twelfth. It affects travelers who
Speaker 2: are heading to twenty nine European countries for visits up
Speaker 2: to ninety days within a one hundred and eighty day period.
Speaker 2: Travelers will scan their passports and have a photograph taken.
Speaker 2: Most will have their fingerprints taken unless you are a
Speaker 2: child under twelve. Travelers might be used to getting their
Speaker 2: passports stamped when they travel abroad, but the new EEES
Speaker 2: program means that passports will not be stamped. Only Americans
Speaker 2: with biometric passports will be able to take part in
Speaker 2: the new entry system. Those who don't have a biometric
Speaker 2: passport will have to join a separate line and travelers
Speaker 2: who overstay the ninety day rule will be identified. You
Speaker 2: stop back and think about this. I should have gone
Speaker 2: back to see when they first started doing passports used
Speaker 2: to have to have government permission and the passports that
Speaker 2: were there. This is something that was twentieth century abomination
Speaker 2: that came in and now it is escalated point that's
Speaker 2: going to be IDs everywhere everywhere we look. We have
Speaker 2: free speech under attack, we have privacy under attack. That's
Speaker 2: why I push back against this thing that. You know,
Speaker 2: what happened with nfil Warriors is against free speech. We
Speaker 2: got free speech being attacked in every way in every country,
Speaker 2: including our own, and a real attack on free speech.
Speaker 2: But when you go out to something that is a
Speaker 2: slander case and you don't even comply with the discovery rules,
Speaker 2: that is not an attack on free speech. We need
Speaker 2: to focus on the attacks on free speech real ones. Well,
Speaker 2: it's not just the inability to fly. They're trying to
Speaker 2: make it unaffordable to have a car, so they want
Speaker 2: to shut down and lock down all travel. Even with cars.
Speaker 2: Average new car price is now topped fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 2: for the first time. As Americans shift to eves and
Speaker 2: to luxury models. The expisration of the seventy five hundred
Speaker 2: dollars ev tax credit helped to spark record sales that
Speaker 2: reshaped September's pricing landscape. But now they said, in just
Speaker 2: five years, folks, the average price of a new car
Speaker 2: has gone from forty thousand dollars to fifty thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Think about that. That's a twenty five percent increase in
Speaker 2: just five years in the price of the car. Truly
Speaker 2: is amazing. What is being done with this? The luxury
Speaker 2: segment has also fueled the price increases. More than sixty
Speaker 2: models with an average sticker price north of seventy five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars contributed to seven point four percent of new
Speaker 2: car sales in September, up from six percent a year earlier. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: the once common twenty thousand dollars car is essentially gone
Speaker 2: from dealership lots. The average age of cars on America's
Speaker 2: roads exceeds twelve years. There we go. We're average average
Speaker 2: monthly payments across the seven hundred and fifty dollars threshold,
Speaker 2: and seven year loans are now more common. One and
Speaker 2: five new car buyers pays more than one thousand dollars
Speaker 2: a month to secure their vehicle. These longer term loans
Speaker 2: carry a lot of risk for consumers, especially because there
Speaker 2: are long term loans on what is a depreciating asset.
Speaker 2: So it's very easy to get underwater on these loans
Speaker 2: and not be able to if you need to get
Speaker 2: if you can't afford the payments, you can't sell it
Speaker 2: for what you still owe on it. Tussla is still
Speaker 2: the dominant player in the EV segment. They're recorded an
Speaker 2: average transaction price of fifty four thousand dollars in September,
Speaker 2: slightly lower than August, but again they are just a
Speaker 2: little bit over the average price of fifty thousand. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: GM is taking a one point six billion dollar hit
Speaker 2: as it scales back its EV operations. Again, these this
Speaker 2: push to forced the car manufacturers to make EV's. When
Speaker 2: we look at VW especially, you know that diesel scam
Speaker 2: thing that they came after them with the EPA in
Speaker 2: order to get them to stop making cheap, reliable, affordable
Speaker 2: diesels and to start making EV's. They got the message
Speaker 2: huge fine by the American EPA and jail sentences for
Speaker 2: a couple of CEOs, so they jumped into EV's and
Speaker 2: guess what, then, nobody wants these things. Nobody can afford
Speaker 2: these things. Same issue going on with BMW, and GM
Speaker 2: is taking a one point six billion dollar hit. The
Speaker 2: company noted that the loss is part of its plan
Speaker 2: to re align EV production and factory operations to better
Speaker 2: match customer demand. The decision was made after the expiration
Speaker 2: of the seventy five hundred dollars federal EV tax credit
Speaker 2: on September thirtieth, part of a broader policy rollback under Trump.
Speaker 2: The One BEAUTI Beautiful Bill Act September thirtieth as the
Speaker 2: final date for getting EV purchase credits, effectively terminating the benefit.
Speaker 2: So it's going to be a big slowdown at this point.
Speaker 2: And GM had previously pledged to invest up to thirty
Speaker 2: five billion dollars in electric and autonomous vehicles through twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five, aiming to transition most of its portfolio to
Speaker 2: zero emission models later in the decade. And again it's
Speaker 2: this zero emission models. It's the biggest issue. You know,
Speaker 2: the hybrids are complicated and expensive, but you know, the
Speaker 2: best model is if you just use a gas driven generator.
Speaker 2: To charge the battery. So make it completely electrical, so
Speaker 2: you don't have to switch back and forth between a
Speaker 2: mechanical drive and electric drive. Just make it all electrical.
Speaker 2: And then you've got a small engine that is going
Speaker 2: to kick on when you need additional range. It can
Speaker 2: charge the battery, and it can use just a little
Speaker 2: bit of fuel and kind of run in a steady
Speaker 2: state mode which can serve fuel and reduces emissions. And
Speaker 2: they won't even allow that that gets shut down. GM
Speaker 2: had one of those, and Mazda wanted to make one
Speaker 2: of those. They actually wanted to use a little rotary
Speaker 2: engine which is very very small, and use that as
Speaker 2: a generator. But no, we have to have zero emissions.
Speaker 2: And if you're going to stick to that, you're going
Speaker 2: to have zero manufacturing. You're going to have zero cars.
Speaker 2: And the rest of this this is government planning and
Speaker 2: this is government misallocation of resources. And of course Biden
Speaker 2: was doing this for the green stuff. But you had
Speaker 2: Trump and Peter Navarro told GM and Ford, you're going
Speaker 2: to stop making cars and you're going to start making ventilators.
Speaker 2: I mean that alone should have made Trump a pariah
Speaker 2: to conservatives, but it didn't. And then the fact that
Speaker 2: it was the ventilators were killing people that didn't phaze
Speaker 2: people either, So he just gets away with all this stuff.
Speaker 2: It's amazing. Despite the playing cutbacks, GM said this month
Speaker 2: that its overall sales remained strong. Analysts have said that
Speaker 2: the end of the federal EV tax credit will test
Speaker 2: whether the EV vehicle market is mature enough to thrive
Speaker 2: on its own fundamentals, or if it still needs support
Speaker 2: to expand further. This is a solution for which nobody
Speaker 2: else thought there was a problem, But if you look
Speaker 2: at what is happening in Germany, it's even worse. This
Speaker 2: is from a daily skeptic, they said. Climate lunatics in
Speaker 2: Hamburg pass a referendum committing Germany's leading industrial city to
Speaker 2: de industrialization completely in just fifteen years. Hamburg is Germany's
Speaker 2: leading industrial city. Its companies add twenty billion euros in
Speaker 2: gross value every year. Much of this economic output is
Speaker 2: related to Hamburg's happy location on the Elba and the
Speaker 2: fact that the city is home to Europe's third largest port.
Speaker 2: All this is made Hamburg extremely prosperous, which prosperity has
Speaker 2: filled it with rafts of clueless virtue. Signaling morons who
Speaker 2: have no idea how anything works and why they find
Speaker 2: Hamburg attractive in the first place, or how their hip
Speaker 2: urban lifestyles are maintained. And so there was a photograph
Speaker 2: they have in this article that's published by build in Germany,
Speaker 2: and you can see, as this author points that this
Speaker 2: is Eugipius, he said, you can see these unmitigated retards
Speaker 2: having a happy because they've just scored cheap virtue points
Speaker 2: by voting their own personal energy apocalypse. And so you
Speaker 2: see these people thumbs up and clampingyay, we won. They're
Speaker 2: celebrating because of their completely insane popular referendum past with
Speaker 2: fifty three point two percent of the vote on Sunday.
Speaker 2: The referendum, the so called Future Decision, binds the Free
Speaker 2: and Hansiatic city to achieving total carbon neutrality by twenty
Speaker 2: to fifty five years earlier than the twenty forty five
Speaker 2: goal set by the almost equally insane German Wide Germany
Speaker 2: Wide Climate Protection Law as mended in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2: So across Germany they have to get to their net
Speaker 2: zero by twenty forty five. So they wanted to speed
Speaker 2: it up in Hamburg and do it five years earlier,
Speaker 2: which would be kind of interesting because they will be
Speaker 2: the literally the Canary and the coal mine or the
Speaker 2: shut coal mine. I guess there's no gas coming out
Speaker 2: of the coal mine anymore because they've shut it. But
Speaker 2: people will be able to see the effects on Hamburg earlier,
Speaker 2: maybe headed off. I don't know what are you.
Speaker 6: Sayingly, it's the can area without a coal mine, that's right.
Speaker 2: I don't got a clue. Yeah, it doesn't have a
Speaker 2: coal mine or a pot to pissen either. That's what's
Speaker 2: going to happen to these people. So that was, in turn,
Speaker 2: five years earlier than the previous twenty to fifty goal.
Speaker 2: And they keep moving these things forward. I wouldn't be
Speaker 2: surprised to see them do another referendum to move it
Speaker 2: up to let's say twenty thirty. That's the magic number
Speaker 2: that everybody's been talking about before. But first they did
Speaker 2: twenty fifty. Then Germany says twenty forty five. Then Hamburg says,
Speaker 2: I see that, and I'm going to raise you by
Speaker 2: five years. We go to twenty forty. So there you go,
Speaker 2: and the loser is Hamburg less than forty four percent
Speaker 2: of eligible voters, even bothered to cast a ballot. Thus,
Speaker 2: just twenty three percent of the most deranged Hamburgians, she
Speaker 2: call them Hamburgers. They're going to be top meat, that's
Speaker 2: for sure, could take their city hostage and use its
Speaker 2: government to destroy all industry and most activity inside the
Speaker 2: next decade and a half. The biggest joke is that
Speaker 2: when Hamburg has finally achieved the sacred net zero, that'll
Speaker 2: make absolutely zero net difference to anything. Because Hamburg is
Speaker 2: responsible for something like zero point zero two two percent
Speaker 2: of CO two emissions globally. The city is not even
Speaker 2: a rounding error. And that's the whole point. When you
Speaker 2: look at this, and does it really make any difference
Speaker 2: when you look at the climate accord think twenty fifteen,
Speaker 2: the Paris Climate Accord. If you're going to allow the
Speaker 2: two countries that have the largest manufacturing and the largest population,
Speaker 2: China and India, to not only not reduce anything, but
Speaker 2: allow them to continue to build out with cheap and
Speaker 2: dirty things while you start putting this on smaller areas
Speaker 2: like that, it doesn't make any sense at all. And
Speaker 2: some of the true believers in this climate mcguffin nonsense,
Speaker 2: people who believe that there really is an issue that
Speaker 2: CO two is really going to warm the planet and
Speaker 2: kill everybody if you believe that nonsense. At least some
Speaker 2: of the people who are that stupid and gullible could
Speaker 2: still see that. Wait a minute, we're talking about global warming,
Speaker 2: so that means that it matters if you have more
Speaker 2: emissions in the biggest countries like China and India. So
Speaker 2: that's the point that's been here all along.
Speaker 5: And the thing is China and India are actually causing
Speaker 5: real ecological problems. Yeah, but we refuse to actually look
Speaker 5: at those. We're forced to look at this nebulous oh
Speaker 5: carbon emissions that will completely hamstring everyone if we actually
Speaker 5: focus on it. But we're not going to do anything
Speaker 5: about the massive amount of pollution that is coming out
Speaker 5: of these two countries. They're allowed to continue to make
Speaker 5: a mess of their own areas, and it's gotten so
Speaker 5: bad that it's starting to affect other people as well. Yeah,
Speaker 5: there's actually a story where the amount of fecal matter
Speaker 5: in the ocean is becoming a problem, Like it's washing
Speaker 5: up on beaches and concentrations that are high enough where
Speaker 5: it's making it so people don't want to go.
Speaker 2: To the beach I prefer plastic.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and it's it's almost literally solely because of India,
Speaker 5: because they're just dumping a ton of raw sewerage directly
Speaker 5: into these rivers that feed out into the ocean, I
Speaker 5: mean the Ganges.
Speaker 2: Well, you see that happening a lot with Mexico doing
Speaker 2: that down there the Baja Peninsula, you know, dumping out
Speaker 2: ross stories that gets up into California sometimes.
Speaker 5: And it's just Mexico's population is so much smaller than India.
Speaker 5: India's population is massive, and I believe, as far as
Speaker 5: I know, it's not sewing down. I believe India is
Speaker 5: still growing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and they have they never had a one child no.
Speaker 5: And they do not have the infrastructure to take care
Speaker 5: of their population, which is part of the reason they're
Speaker 5: so dead set on shipping them all out. If they
Speaker 5: were to stay in India, it would be a massive
Speaker 5: problem for them. But if they can continue to breed
Speaker 5: this massive population and then just shove the workers out
Speaker 5: and do other economies where they siphon money off, it's
Speaker 5: a great business deal for them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not a buget's the future now. So Yeah,
Speaker 2: when you look at China, remember a couple of years
Speaker 2: ago they started making all this noise about all the
Speaker 2: plastic pollution in the ocean. Well turns out that was
Speaker 2: all coming from China and it was all focused around
Speaker 2: that particular area. But they put that narrative out and
Speaker 2: part of the reason that they put it out was
Speaker 2: because they were losing their narrative about climate change, which is, ever,
Speaker 2: none of their predictions have ever panned out, none of
Speaker 2: their models have ever panned out, and so people are
Speaker 2: starting to question all this zero nonsense. So they fell
Speaker 2: back to their initial starting position, which is we're going
Speaker 2: to clean this up. And we talk about cleaning stuff up.
Speaker 2: Wuhan has some of the worst air anywhere in the world,
Speaker 2: and again they don't bother to clean the stuff up.
Speaker 2: As a Eugipiis says, it's absolutely imperative to get these
Speaker 2: sorts of people out of politics. They're crazy, They are
Speaker 2: doing everything in their power to destroy civilization. They're insulated
Speaker 2: from a lot of the economic chaos that they wreak
Speaker 2: because they're overwhelmingly government bureaucrats, university types, and hipsters who
Speaker 2: are to a varying degree reliant on the state to
Speaker 2: make their living. They're renters rather than owners. They live
Speaker 2: near the city center rather than in the suburbs, and
Speaker 2: they're young rather than old, so we pretty much know
Speaker 2: where this kind of stuff is coming from.
Speaker 13: Now.
Speaker 2: We've had a couple of different incidents about semi trailers
Speaker 2: and the drivers who don't have legitimate commercial driver's licenses
Speaker 2: and who don't speak English, and we have another one.
Speaker 2: It's just it. This is ICE is ready to deport
Speaker 2: an Indian illegal who had a New York commercial driver's
Speaker 2: license and his name was no name given. And that
Speaker 2: was really funny, was that this article from New American
Speaker 2: refers to him as mister given. Well, yeah, mister given.
Speaker 2: He's taken into custody, arrested in Oklahoma, and he had
Speaker 2: a New York commercial driver's license with a name no
Speaker 2: name given. Homeland Security reported ICE revealed the slippery mister
Speaker 2: givens real name, and that's equally amusing. His real name
Speaker 2: is Ann Mole and Mole he's like Buttros Buttrous Collige,
Speaker 2: the guy who's so nice. They named him twice. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so it's funny people, it's the same name. Back to back.
Speaker 2: The beginning of the end of Amal and Moll's career
Speaker 2: as an illegal alien driver September twenty fifth, on their
Speaker 2: state forty runs east west through Oklahoma, runs east west
Speaker 2: through the entire country, actually goes from think it's Wilmington
Speaker 2: all the way over to California. I don't know what
Speaker 2: the terminal point is in California. Anyway, Today they caught
Speaker 2: en mool and mole a. Thirty authorities or so arrested
Speaker 2: one hundred and twenty five illegals from multiple countries, including India, Uzbekistan, China, Russia, Georgia, Turkey, Tajikistan, Ukraine,
Speaker 2: and Mauritania. If New York wants to hand out commercial
Speaker 2: driver's licenses to illegal immigrants with no name given, that's
Speaker 2: on them, said GOP Governor Kevin Stitt. And so even
Speaker 2: more disturbing is the fact that the license bore the
Speaker 2: trademark star of real ID. He got a real ID
Speaker 2: with no name. Real idea is supposed to make us safe,
Speaker 2: because as supposed to identify everybody after nine to eleven.
Speaker 5: Right, who would have thought that these government programs are
Speaker 5: inefficient and overly cumbersome.
Speaker 2: Yeah, now it's supposed to be. You know, you've got
Speaker 2: to have it to get on airplane.
Speaker 6: And the other thing that this article isn't stating is
Speaker 6: that I don't think a US citizen would be able
Speaker 6: to get a no name given driver's license.
Speaker 5: That's right, given two illegals, that's right. Yeah, if you
Speaker 5: or I were to show up and pull something like that,
Speaker 5: they'd throw us out in our ear. Yeah, you're going
Speaker 5: to come back and you're going to comply with every
Speaker 5: last bit of bureaucracy.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, you know, you have these states like
Speaker 2: New York and California, and of course this is one
Speaker 2: area where the federal government I think does have jurisdiction
Speaker 2: since the federal government in a sense, since they kind
Speaker 2: of own the interstate system, they paid for it, and
Speaker 2: they have massive subsidy of it, whether we like it
Speaker 2: or not. Richard Nixon used that to enforce his fifty
Speaker 2: five mile hour speed limit, saying I'm not going to
Speaker 2: give you highway funds to maintain this thing. Again, it
Speaker 2: always comes back to the money, so they don't have
Speaker 2: a legal fight. It's like, I'll give you money if
Speaker 2: you do fifty five mile an hour speed limit, and
Speaker 2: by the way, you get to keep all the revenue
Speaker 2: from the tickets that you write, So you can either
Speaker 2: do that or I will take the highway funds from
Speaker 2: you and you will have to pay to maintain the
Speaker 2: interstate yourself. So there is something that they could do
Speaker 2: about this, but we had not. Just you know, a
Speaker 2: couple of weeks ago. The thing that outraged everybody was
Speaker 2: that ridiculous U turn that eighteen wheeler guy did. Didn't
Speaker 2: speak English, and you can see it on the video
Speaker 2: camera that's in his cab. You can see him driving
Speaker 2: and then you can see over his shoulder as he's
Speaker 2: got his turning his thing in a U turn and
Speaker 2: it's across the road. This car can't stop and go
Speaker 2: sliding into it killed all three people in the car.
Speaker 2: And so that really got everybody's attention. And this is
Speaker 2: getting a lot of attention as well. This is a
Speaker 2: foreign trucker that was going the wrong way down the
Speaker 2: interstate and he gets stopped by an American trucker. It's
Speaker 2: a little bit of language that, I mean, what the
Speaker 2: sort what he's gonna get in front of him?
Speaker 1: Here?
Speaker 2: I guess you can't read the signs to say which
Speaker 2: way the road is?
Speaker 6: What are you doing?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 12: Go way that way?
Speaker 3: But I.
Speaker 5: Was like, let me ask you a question.
Speaker 13: Man, Okay, you are going the wrong way down the freeway.
Speaker 13: You are committing a felony right now. Welcome, Well one,
Speaker 13: why the fuck going the wrong way down the freeway's right?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 13: No, I I'm just asking because I'm yeah, turn around
Speaker 13: when you have a clear spot. Don't even move your truck.
Speaker 13: Turn your hazard lights on for one. Turn your hazard
Speaker 13: lights on. Now, your hazard lights, your blinkers.
Speaker 2: Teach him how to drive.
Speaker 1: Your hazard lights on.
Speaker 13: They're on.
Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, that's going pretty viral. So Department Transportation issued
Speaker 2: an emergency rule tightening up who can hold US commercial
Speaker 2: driver's licenses. This will limit the CDLs to US citizens
Speaker 2: and lawful permanent residents until states prove that they are
Speaker 2: following federal standards. Wait a minute, what's that about until
Speaker 2: Why wouldn't just limit it to US citizens and lawful
Speaker 2: permanent residents. Why this until thing? Right? I don't get that.
Speaker 2: This is like saying we're going to stop the nine
Speaker 2: billion dollars to Harvard that we're giving them each year
Speaker 2: from the federal government until they stop these protesters of
Speaker 2: what Israel is doing, then we'll give them the nine
Speaker 2: billion dollars. Again. Some DMVs found them pushing unqualified applicants
Speaker 2: through the system. As a matter of fact, we had
Speaker 2: that report that we showed where they were. Actually the
Speaker 2: people at the DMV were working with these guys who
Speaker 2: couldn't pass the test, helping them to pass the test.
Speaker 2: We're talking about drivers who couldn't read road signs, couldn't
Speaker 2: communicate with law enforcement, might even wind up going the
Speaker 2: wrong way on the interstate. The result is, of course,
Speaker 2: massive chaos on the highways, a lot of fatal crashes
Speaker 2: that should have never happened. I tell you I was
Speaker 2: in We'd go in early in the morning when I
Speaker 2: was in Austin driving it for him, and it was
Speaker 2: a divided highway, four lanes, two on each side of
Speaker 2: the division, and I'm driving along. All I said, see
Speaker 2: headlights on my side of the road, and say what's
Speaker 2: going on? And I get over to the right as
Speaker 2: far as possible, and this person just goes barreling by
Speaker 2: thinking that they were on a two lane road and
Speaker 2: they were going wrong, going really fast too. So it's
Speaker 2: not just the truckers. Their Transportation and Secretary Sean Duffy said,
Speaker 2: the Americans who've been in the trucking industry for fifty
Speaker 2: years through. Family businesses can't do business anymore because you
Speaker 2: have these illegals coming in, living out of their trucks.
Speaker 2: You have teams of drivers and they're not safe, they
Speaker 2: can't speak the language. They come in under price, way
Speaker 2: under price, he said. Bill Skinnery, trucking expert, warned. He said,
Speaker 2: almost a third of our nation's freight is hauled by
Speaker 2: non US, non citizen drivers. That's not just a safety issue,
Speaker 2: he said, there's other issues involved in that. And as
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, on some positive news, one trucker
Speaker 2: posted on that and about a run that he had
Speaker 2: from Chicago to Fargo. He said, normally I do this
Speaker 2: for twelve hundred dollars, but I had a delivery broker
Speaker 2: call and offer me eighteen hundred dollars. So they're starting
Speaker 2: to feel the pinch of having some of this cheap
Speaker 2: labor because they get people who don't know how to
Speaker 2: read signs. Craig Fuller, who runs freight Waves, pointed out
Speaker 2: the shift. He said volumes are anemic. In other words,
Speaker 2: the economy is turning down. Nevertheless, spot rates rose two percent. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he said, we're seeing the bottom feeders get squeezed out.
Speaker 2: Of the market, since these firms don't operate in the
Speaker 2: contract market. A series of busts that reveal just how
Speaker 2: deep the problem ran. In Oklahoma alone, a three day
Speaker 2: sweep along I forty netted over ninety illegal drivers in Semis,
Speaker 2: with reports putting the number as high as one hundred
Speaker 2: and twenty or even one hundred and thirty. In related stings,
Speaker 2: agents confiscate licenses from those lacking proper entry papers like
Speaker 2: the I ninety four form proving legal arrival, and that
Speaker 2: was where they found the New York commercial driver's license
Speaker 2: that said no name given as the license holder. Well,
Speaker 2: when we look at what is happening here, I've got
Speaker 2: one more story here before we run out of time.
Speaker 2: We've got some comments that do want to carry. But
Speaker 2: this I thought was very interesting because there's a new
Speaker 2: book out and it's actually free. You can get it online.
Speaker 2: As the title here from wg dot org said, it's
Speaker 2: another case for Christ. This is a groundbreaking defense of
Speaker 2: the historical account of Jesus. And of course, if you
Speaker 2: know anything about Josephus and his history books, he wrote
Speaker 2: significantly about the fall of Jerusalem in seventy a d.
Speaker 2: And there was a passage there where he talked about
Speaker 2: Jesus Christ, and a lot of people because it was
Speaker 2: so fit the biblical account so much, a lot of
Speaker 2: people discounted it and said it must have been added later.
Speaker 2: How were this guy? His name is TC Schmidt, and
Speaker 2: the book is Josephus and Jesus new evidence for the
Speaker 2: one called Christ, and in it what he did was
Speaker 2: he looked at it linguistically in other issues to say that, no,
Speaker 2: I think what he wrote. I think this is actually
Speaker 2: written by Josephus and not put in later on. So
Speaker 2: this is a scholarly analysis. He uses cutting age stylometric
Speaker 2: analysis to show the passages vocabulary and style aligned very
Speaker 2: closely with Josephus's other writings, dispelling doubts about his authorship.
Speaker 2: He further demonstrates that ancient Christians, unlike modern skeptics, often
Speaker 2: read the Testimonium as neutral or even slightly negative. In
Speaker 2: other words, they weren't looking at the saying this validates
Speaker 2: what we said about Jesus. He said, well, no, actually
Speaker 2: a lot more to it than that. Not as a
Speaker 2: glowing endorsement of Jesus. Christians, this is a game changer.
Speaker 2: The earliest non Christians reference to Jesus, documented within six
Speaker 2: decades of his crucifixion, confirms his historical existence, his miracles,
Speaker 2: and the enduring faith of his followers. Schmidt's study transforms
Speaker 2: a long debated text into a powerful apologetic tool, offering external, independent,
Speaker 2: and non Christian validation of the Gospel accounts. Again, the
Speaker 2: book is Josephus and Jesus and the subtitle is New
Speaker 2: Evidence for the One called Christ and you can find
Speaker 2: that free online if you're interested in reading it. And
Speaker 2: one of the things when we talk about martyrs, Christian martyrs,
Speaker 2: you know, that is the Greek word for witness, and
Speaker 2: it was the people who were actually witnesses to it
Speaker 2: that were killed. And that's one of the best affirmations
Speaker 2: you can have with the truth of something. Most people
Speaker 2: when they make a deathbed confession can or they stick
Speaker 2: to a store upon penalty of death, a story that
Speaker 2: will get them killed. That's a pretty good confirmation that
Speaker 2: those people believed that it was absolutely true. And so
Speaker 2: that's why when you see people like cold case Christianity
Speaker 2: was his Jay Warner Fallas Wallace. Yes, there's things like
Speaker 2: that that as a cold case or detective, those are
Speaker 2: the types of things that carry a great deal of weight. Well,
Speaker 2: before we run out of time, Travis, see how many
Speaker 2: of these comments you can get.
Speaker 5: Here, Let's go. Brian and Dev McCartney. I had to
Speaker 5: have my hand swabbed in Cincinnati yesterday because I do
Speaker 5: not have real ID. Sanam a terris to them for
Speaker 5: not complying with it.
Speaker 2: You must have dirty hands. You don't have real ID.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Ran, I'll say. Asked if I was more dangerous
Speaker 5: than most, he was not amused. I refused the facial
Speaker 5: scan to NIBERU twenty twenty nine biometric passports from Emperor
Speaker 5: Trump's biometric ID track and trace company. Brian de McCartney
Speaker 5: also says I got flag flying out in September as well.
Speaker 5: I had to remove my shoes and got pulled aside
Speaker 5: for public grow. I told them to do the humiliation
Speaker 5: ritual where all the other sheep could see.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I make them do that, but I don't fly anymore.
Speaker 2: That's the last time I'd done that for years. It's
Speaker 2: like I'm going to be as much of a cog in,
Speaker 2: as much of a monkey wrench in and the machinery
Speaker 2: as I can.
Speaker 5: If you get enough blood in the gears eventually they
Speaker 5: stopped to function. Real, Jason Barker, I remember when you
Speaker 5: were hard pressed to get a four year car loan.
Speaker 5: Three years was standard for a new car. Ibero twenty
Speaker 5: twenty nine. Fifty thousand dollars car equal two thousand year
Speaker 5: insurance costs with equal registration costs. Yeah, that's part of
Speaker 5: the reason insurance is going up. Eric Peters has talked
Speaker 5: about that. I think you mentioned it when he was
Speaker 5: on with me though one time, how it's bloating the
Speaker 5: cost on everything. Steve abs Eric Peters, Oh wow, yeah. Look,
Speaker 5: Eric Peters had a few articles and why even for
Speaker 5: me no accidents and tickets, as to why my car
Speaker 5: insurance keeps going up. It's those fifty k car owners.
Speaker 2: See.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you guys are sharp. You guys get up before
Speaker 5: Eve and I do. It's all about fifty minute city,
Speaker 5: says big Bit Nibero twenty to nine. Once the marks
Speaker 5: markiev industry, it says, maybe the China plub the nation
Speaker 5: with cheap junk EV's, the federal government increases gas prices
Speaker 5: exponentially for sales. Thank you all very much.
Speaker 2: Have a great day. Let me get you to read
Speaker 2: the ads that the describers for pharmaceutical companies. Thank you,
Speaker 2: have a good day. The common man. They created common Core,
Speaker 2: dumb down our children. They created common past, track and
Speaker 2: control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners
Speaker 2: own nothing and the communist future. They see the common
Speaker 2: man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has
Speaker 2: worth and dignity created in the image of God. That
Speaker 2: is what we have in common. That is what they
Speaker 2: want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 2: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 2: every thing from us. It's time to turn that around
Speaker 2: and expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 2: information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 2: Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
Speaker 2: can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 2: Ddavidnightshow dot com