Speaker 1: Bill Cunning Immigrant America. Welcome to Polton cost two, Gerrick
Speaker 1: m and christ Vengus Bengals teed up on Sunday against
Speaker 1: the Brownies. They're dangerous, I think, Moeger tells me. In
Speaker 1: the last ten games against Cleveland.
Speaker 2: The Bengals are two and eight, which isn't too good
Speaker 2: despite the fact that Shaun Watson continues to have difficulties.
Speaker 2: The Mistake on the Lakes is going to be a
Speaker 2: hard place for the Bengals to play. We'll see what happens,
Speaker 2: but until then, there's much confusion, according to Tony Bender
Speaker 2: and others, about what is status you won and is
Speaker 2: it good or bad for the country. Should we not
Speaker 2: vote for those on the Reapportionment boarder, should we let
Speaker 2: retired judges simply reminisce with academics and a point whoever
Speaker 2: they would like? And then thirdly that means we're done
Speaker 2: voting in the state of Ohio for the members of
Speaker 2: the Reapportionment Board plus the Attorney General. David Yost had
Speaker 2: a big arrest yesterday involving one hundred and thirty two
Speaker 2: arrests for trying to buy and sell sex in the
Speaker 2: state of Ohio, but First of all, David Yost, welcome
Speaker 2: again to the Bill Cunningham Show and day. First of all,
Speaker 2: can you tell the American people and a capsule, because
Speaker 2: I think there's much confusion about issue one? What is
Speaker 2: state Issue one? Vote yes or no? But first of all,
Speaker 2: describe that to the American people. What is statusue one
Speaker 2: in the state of Ohio.
Speaker 3: Well, let's start at the top. It's bad and you
Speaker 3: should vote no. And you and I are going to
Speaker 3: talk about this for a few minutes and talk about
Speaker 3: why it's bad. But I'm not asking you to take
Speaker 3: my word for it. Go read the damned thing. And
Speaker 3: if at the end of it you don't understand it,
Speaker 3: vote no. Because they want to put these words in
Speaker 3: our constitution. They're never coming out if they go in,
Speaker 3: and you should understand what they're trying to do to
Speaker 3: your constitution before you vote yes. But why is it bad?
Speaker 3: If we're starters. You already talked about it in your
Speaker 3: opening right now. If you don't like the district lines
Speaker 3: that get drawn, you get to vote against the governor,
Speaker 3: you get to vote against the Secretary of State and
Speaker 3: the daity. You can throw the bums out and say
Speaker 3: you didn't play fair. That doesn't happen, and there's a
Speaker 3: reason that it doesn't happen. We have had successfully better
Speaker 3: more fair lines. Can we do better yet? I'm sure
Speaker 3: that we can. But the fact of the matter is
Speaker 3: we've had a reform that was voted in twenty fifteen
Speaker 3: and twenty eighteen. Seventy percent of Ohiolands voted for that.
Speaker 3: What they want to do now is throw that out
Speaker 3: and enshrine an unaccountable group of people that is going
Speaker 3: to have a constitutional mandate to crack up the cities,
Speaker 3: split up cities and counties and school districts, communities of
Speaker 3: interest in favor of trying to make make the Democratic
Speaker 3: Party more competitive. That's what this is about. Has nothing
Speaker 3: to do with fairness, and it is all about a
Speaker 3: revenge play from the former Chief Justice who just can't
Speaker 3: believe she didn't have the authority to order the elected
Speaker 3: General Assembly around to do whatever she wanted to do.
Speaker 3: This is a terrible, terrible idea.
Speaker 2: All right now, I'm going to read to the American people,
Speaker 2: with your permission, mister Attorney General, the first sentence on
Speaker 2: the ballot itself. So if you're a voter, don't rely
Speaker 2: upon the Great American or David Yost, listen to this.
Speaker 2: A majority yes vote is necessary for the amendment to pass.
Speaker 2: The proposed amendment would one repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering
Speaker 2: approved on nearly three quarters of the Ohio electors participating
Speaker 2: in the statewide elections of twenty fifteen and eighteen, and
Speaker 2: eliminate the long standing ability of Ohio citizens to hold
Speaker 2: the representatives accountable first hand publishing fair state legislative and
Speaker 2: congressional districts.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 2: It is so the party that demands democracy, the party
Speaker 2: that are called Democrats, want to take away as a citizen,
Speaker 2: your right to vote for members on the Reapportionment Board.
Speaker 4: Is that correct?
Speaker 3: That is exactly correct. You get to vote for him. Now,
Speaker 3: you don't get to vote for him if you vote
Speaker 3: yes on Issue one.
Speaker 4: It's unbelievable.
Speaker 2: So briefly, there's seven members of the board every ten
Speaker 2: years that get together after the census. And the members
Speaker 2: of the board are the governor. I think we vote
Speaker 2: for the governor. The secretary of State, we vote for
Speaker 2: the secretary of state, the auditor of state, we vote
Speaker 2: for that person. Then there's two from theslature, four from
Speaker 2: the legislatures split two from the House, two from the Senate.
Speaker 2: We vote for them, including Democrats. There's mandatory Democrats on
Speaker 2: the Reapportionment Board, and we vote for these men and
Speaker 2: women to say, Okay, every ten years, do your job,
Speaker 2: and we vote. If this thing passes, there's no more
Speaker 2: voting the appellate judges. Maybe my wife among others, would
Speaker 2: get together, Get five Democrats, five Republicans, five independents. The
Speaker 2: people of Ohio will no longer vote for members of
Speaker 2: the Reapportionment Board, and away we go for the next
Speaker 2: for the rest of the century. David Yost, how stupid
Speaker 2: is that?
Speaker 3: I almost can't add anything to that. But let me
Speaker 3: try that fifteen member board you talked about. If you
Speaker 3: have been a veteran, if you've been on the active
Speaker 3: or reserve status in the United States military, you can't serve.
Speaker 3: If in the last five years you've been part of
Speaker 3: law enforcement, you've been a cop, you can't serve. You're
Speaker 3: a public employee, you're disqualified. And how about this. Do
Speaker 3: you know how much it's going to cost to do it?
Speaker 3: Nobody knows because it just says, whatever you want, we
Speaker 3: have to spend it. It's kind of like this Consumer
Speaker 3: Protection bureauer Rich Artery used to run. You know, they
Speaker 3: just take the money out of the federal reserve. I guess,
Speaker 3: and you know, however much you want, you get it.
Speaker 3: There's no zero accountability, judicial review. It's limited to one
Speaker 3: tiny question. Everything else off the table. You can't even
Speaker 3: bring a lawsuit. There will be no challenges. There's no accountability.
Speaker 3: These people are being elected as the right hand of
Speaker 3: God to do what they think is right. That's not
Speaker 3: the way we work. We have separation of powers, we
Speaker 3: have accountability, we have judicial review, we have the people
Speaker 3: who get to decide who they are, who is in charge,
Speaker 3: and they what they're allowed to do. The first part
Speaker 3: of the Constitution says all political power is adherents and
Speaker 3: the people. But what this Issue one does is it says,
Speaker 3: notwithstanding any other part of the Constitution, to the contry,
Speaker 3: we're going to do these things, which means, folks, the
Speaker 3: people are no longer in charge once this goes into effect.
Speaker 2: And I would assume none of these proposals ever happen
Speaker 2: in so called blue states. You will never see California,
Speaker 2: New York, Connecticut, Oregon ever propose something like this because
Speaker 2: they have complete control and when the Democrats had complete
Speaker 2: control with Ted Strickland, etc. No one brought these things
Speaker 2: because the Democrats are in charge. So if Democrats keep
Speaker 2: losing statewide elections, let's change the rules, whether it's involves
Speaker 2: jerry mandering, or get rid of the filibuster, or get
Speaker 2: ready to Electora College.
Speaker 4: If you don't win, change the rules.
Speaker 2: And they're selling this thing as something it isn't, which
Speaker 2: is about democracy, I would encourage citizens to read the
Speaker 2: first sentence of the constitutional amendment on the ballot and say, yeah,
Speaker 2: I'll take some of that.
Speaker 4: I don't want to vote anymore.
Speaker 2: I want these unelected bureaucrats to spend unlimited amounts of
Speaker 2: money every ten years in draw districts and slice up
Speaker 2: Warren County, slice up Hamilton County, slice up Claremont County
Speaker 2: to fit some academic pursuit, and I don't want to
Speaker 2: vote anymore.
Speaker 4: And that I'd be the message now.
Speaker 2: Secondly, I see in the Columbus Dispatch yesterday's headline state
Speaker 2: wide sting leads to one hundred and thirty two arrests
Speaker 2: for trying to buy sex. Can you explain the state
Speaker 2: wide operation that you headed as the Attorney.
Speaker 3: General, Yeah, Over one hundred law enforcement agencies across the state,
Speaker 3: along with social agencies, did a coordinated sting last week
Speaker 3: and it was focused on the buying of sex in Ohio.
Speaker 3: Here's the thing, human trafficking runs because of money. Nobody
Speaker 3: does the dirty, stinky, criminal business that could send you
Speaker 3: to prison of human trafficking if they're not making money,
Speaker 3: not making a lot of money at it. So in
Speaker 3: addition to going after the traffickers, which we do, hammer
Speaker 3: and Tong, we're also trying to send a message to
Speaker 3: the people, mostly men, who who buiseex in Ohio, don't
Speaker 3: do that. You're at the very least taking the risk
Speaker 3: of your complicit in human trafficking, very likely actually complicit.
Speaker 3: If we can take away the money from the marketplace,
Speaker 3: the marketplace will drive up, dry up.
Speaker 2: I want to read from the story, David Yost. Among
Speaker 2: those arrested Charles Arnold, fifty five of Dayton, Charles Arnold,
Speaker 2: who is the chief Fire Inspector for the High Department
Speaker 2: of Commerce. These are the defendants criminal. Secondly, Jeffrey Startzman,
Speaker 2: sixty eight of Brookville, a former prosecutor magistrate serves on
Speaker 2: the Montgomery County Alcoholic Drug Addiction and Mental Health Board
Speaker 2: and John Hughes thirty five, who works for the State
Speaker 2: Treasurer's office and referees high school sports.
Speaker 4: Unbelievable.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Equally unbelievable is that we had twenty some of
Speaker 3: those guys in addition to the Johns, that were looking
Speaker 3: to do kind of more normal things. I guess we
Speaker 3: had a couple of dozen people guys who were trying
Speaker 3: to buy sex from miners. They thought they thought they
Speaker 3: were meeting a kid.
Speaker 2: It was always so did these events? Did these events
Speaker 2: actually occur? Or this thing operation kept them from occurring?
Speaker 3: Right, So what they do is the officers impersonate a
Speaker 3: identity of the minor or what have you, and arranges
Speaker 3: a meet and we've got all the texts or the
Speaker 3: telephone calls or what have you. So that's the way
Speaker 3: it works.
Speaker 4: And I would assume this.
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Startzman character sixty eight years old, former prosecutor and magistrate.
Speaker 2: He serves on the Montgomery County Drug and Alcoholic Treatment Board.
Speaker 2: He probably has accessed to lots of young women, and
Speaker 2: I guess boys also are a young men that have difficulties.
Speaker 2: And then John Hughes as a referee in high school
Speaker 2: thirty five years old. He's a high school referee. Access
Speaker 2: to children, and what role does that? What work does
Speaker 2: human trafficking play with illegals and those coming across the border,
Speaker 2: the vulnerability of young women, young men, boys and girls.
Speaker 2: What does it play into the wide open southern border
Speaker 2: we have? What does it play into this?
Speaker 3: Well, the wide open border makes it much easier to traffic.
Speaker 3: And if you are vulnerable, if you don't speak the language,
Speaker 3: if you're you know, without parental support, if you are
Speaker 3: drug addicted, poor, broke, without contacts, that's a perfect recipe
Speaker 3: for a human trafficker. They don't go after they don't
Speaker 3: snatch people off the street that are going to fight back.
Speaker 3: They look for people who are vulnerable and they groom
Speaker 3: them or they use other techniques. But that's a complicating factor.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to say it's the sole causal factor
Speaker 3: that if we get the border under control, everything's going
Speaker 3: to be fine, but it is making things more difficult.
Speaker 3: Can I change the subject just a second? Breaking news.
Speaker 3: We have breaking news right here on the Bill Cunningham
Speaker 3: Show as I'm speaking to you. We've got a court
Speaker 3: decision just now in the drop Box case and you'll
Speaker 3: recall that frank Lrose had after he was told that
Speaker 3: he had to let disabled people pick whoever they wanted
Speaker 3: to bring their ballot in, he put on a rule
Speaker 3: that said, okay, you can do that, but we're not
Speaker 3: going to let you use the dropbox for that. You're
Speaker 3: going to have to come into the Board of Elections
Speaker 3: and fill out a form that says, I'm bringing this
Speaker 3: in for so and so who's a disabled voter. So
Speaker 3: then we want to have somebody, you know, dropping five
Speaker 3: hundred quote unquote disabled votes into a drop box. I'm
Speaker 3: not saying anybody would do that. I'm not saying it
Speaker 3: would happen. Yes, it would, But you don't wait until
Speaker 3: the You don't wait until the bank is robbed, put
Speaker 3: a lock on the vault. You do that beforehand. You
Speaker 3: anticipate that people might want to do that. Uh, and
Speaker 3: you take action. Well, the Democratic Party and the A C,
Speaker 3: l U, et cetera, the usual suspects, of course, sued
Speaker 3: the state over sued Franklin Rose over that, and we
Speaker 3: just won in the Ohio Supreme Court. Frank's directive will
Speaker 3: be operational, and drop boxes are going to be one
Speaker 3: vote at a time. For for this. So I'm excited
Speaker 3: about that, and I thought i'd share it with you. Right.
Speaker 2: So that means and the few of us that may
Speaker 2: have a disability, if we want to give to someone
Speaker 2: who disabled, I want to get my ballot to Tony Bender,
Speaker 2: who may be disabled mentally, physically, emotionally and otherwise. And
Speaker 2: I'll say, Okay, Tony, you take my ballot in there
Speaker 2: and you drop it in. If that's the case, then
Speaker 2: one of us, the healthy person, so to speak, must
Speaker 2: go into the Board of Elections say here I am,
Speaker 2: here's the ballot from Tony Bender. He's kind of a
Speaker 2: there elect he can't do anything, and I can sign
Speaker 2: a form and that's the vote for Tony Bender.
Speaker 4: Correct.
Speaker 3: Yes, although I would not characterize Tony that way.
Speaker 2: But it keeps people from gaming the system and so
Speaker 2: called harvesting ballots, especially from nursing home. Some one person
Speaker 2: could say, I got one hundred people in a nursing
Speaker 2: home and God bless them all, but I got their
Speaker 2: hundred ballots right here.
Speaker 4: I'll put them in a drop box. He said. When
Speaker 4: I wait a minute, you come on inside. It's on video.
Speaker 2: Let's see who you are, and let's look at the ballots,
Speaker 2: and that's the way that's done. So the Supreme Court said,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, let's have legitimate elections, and especially if
Speaker 2: it's a prison community, or mental health facility or a
Speaker 2: drug addicted one person, one vote here, I am, I
Speaker 2: can vote.
Speaker 4: You can't vote for one hundred people. Is that the goal?
Speaker 3: That is a goal. And I will caution you that
Speaker 3: I only read the top of the opinion that just
Speaker 3: came in over my email. But I thought that you
Speaker 3: and your listeners would want to know, be the first
Speaker 3: to know.
Speaker 2: In fact, I voted already a few days ago. The
Speaker 2: People's judge and I sat at our kitchen table. I
Speaker 2: applied for an absentee ballot for no reason, it arrived
Speaker 2: in the mail. I don't stand at the on the
Speaker 2: ballot box on November the fifth and read everything. You
Speaker 2: have time to sit down, read what's going on, Talk
Speaker 2: to each other, what do you think?
Speaker 4: Okay?
Speaker 2: But we went online do a judicial candidate. We didn't
Speaker 2: know who's this person to read about them. That's the
Speaker 2: way to vote. In other words, vote early, vote often,
Speaker 2: be at the kitchen table, get out the ballot, get
Speaker 2: your internet going. You can find everything you want it
Speaker 2: drives me nuts on election day, which I don't do anymore,
Speaker 2: that people stand there actors. If okay, who's running? What
Speaker 2: are the issues? How am I supposed to vote? Where's
Speaker 2: the language? That is stupid? I would encourage people, don't
Speaker 2: be stupid to vote early. Would you agree? Not only
Speaker 2: that I could not.
Speaker 3: Let's say I walk across High Street tomorrow and get
Speaker 3: hit by a bus. I didn't want to have died
Speaker 3: without having cast my vote against the insanity of the
Speaker 3: progressive left. Sy I wouldn't want that on my conscience
Speaker 3: before I stood before Saint Peter and God himself to
Speaker 3: give an account for my life.
Speaker 2: And it's so easy to vote today. I know there's
Speaker 2: a lot of voter suppression going on. It happens everywhere.
Speaker 2: I smell it, I can see it. A voter suppression
Speaker 2: is everywhere. But it's easier to vote than it is
Speaker 2: to order a hamburger. But nonetheless, David Yost, thank you
Speaker 2: for this, and thank you for explaining State Issue one
Speaker 2: and also on this thing operation for the perverts who
Speaker 2: want to have sex with children, may they rot in hell.
Speaker 2: But David Yos, once again, thank you for coming on
Speaker 2: the bill. Cunningham show, and God bless you, and God
Speaker 2: bless the Attorney General of the State of Ohio, David Yost.
Speaker 4: David, thank you very much.
Speaker 3: Good to talk to you.
Speaker 4: God bless America.
Speaker 2: Let's continue with more and the f line becomes available
Speaker 2: five on three, seven, four, nine, seven thousand. Billy cunning
Speaker 2: in the Great American Live, It's the Home of the Bengals.
Speaker 2: News Radio seven hundred ww