Speaker 1: I'm a man who believed that I died twenty years ago,
Speaker 1: and I lived like a man who is dead already.
Speaker 2: I have no fear whatsoever of anybody or anything.
Speaker 3: It's Gary Webb.
Speaker 4: I am an investigative journalist can In nineteen ninety six.
Speaker 5: I wrote a series of stories in Time Parkwayans which
Speaker 5: was about CIA.
Speaker 6: Involvement in.
Speaker 3: I You a man who wasn't said to smiles at us.
Speaker 3: All all a man can do is smile back.
Speaker 7: Both in Stolen Bone the Secret Society, it's so sick as.
Speaker 3: We can't talk about what.
Speaker 2: Does that mean for America? The conspiracy an.
Speaker 3: I haven't seen the number three two.
Speaker 8: My sad duty to report this afternoon that my friend
Speaker 8: and colleague Tim Russell collapsed and died earlier this afternoon.
Speaker 9: I may die in this cult night or in the
Speaker 9: area tomorrow.
Speaker 6: I'm afraid what possible difference.
Speaker 7: Can I make? And no official of my administration, whether
Speaker 7: his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should
Speaker 7: interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to sense
Speaker 7: of the news, to stifle descent, to cover Obama mistakes,
Speaker 7: or to withhold from the press and the public the
Speaker 7: facts they deserve to.
Speaker 10: Know, welcome back, already dead your favorite weekly lie call
Speaker 10: in conspiracy show. You already dead heads, be sure to
Speaker 10: call in. We'll have the number up shortly. We have
Speaker 10: plenty to talk about. We have the the saga of
Speaker 10: the weekend wars still continuing, but hey, it's okay. We're
Speaker 10: we're saving it for the weekend, So only war on
Speaker 10: the weekend Monday through Friday, nine to five. Don't worry
Speaker 10: about it. We got oil markets to be concerned about.
Speaker 10: But yeah, we have plenty to go through with you all.
Speaker 11: Today.
Speaker 10: We have Austin Wade Picard as always, and myself jose Galisan,
Speaker 10: your intrepid co hosts.
Speaker 11: So, Austin, how you feeling this week? I don't know.
Speaker 10: It seems like just kind of we're on autopilot a
Speaker 10: little bit from last week. Nothing really needs changed. Things
Speaker 10: have gotten worse, a sort of better, but not. It's
Speaker 10: a little confusing. It's a it's a lot of just
Speaker 10: a whiplash diplomacy that's completely founded on bullshit.
Speaker 2: So yeah, absolutely, brother, But I will say I mean
Speaker 2: false Flag Watch two point zero in a way, as
Speaker 2: far as the past couple of weeks, we've been on
Speaker 2: the lookout our heads on a swivel and here we
Speaker 2: go again again is kind of how it feels, right,
Speaker 2: just as far as the San Andreas meme. But when
Speaker 2: I saw this strange report of these major anti Semitic
Speaker 2: arsen attacks, or at least one specifically that happened in London,
Speaker 2: it was called.
Speaker 11: I thought, where do I sign up? Just a joke.
Speaker 2: You've got to be careful these days, apparently because we're
Speaker 2: having American sheriffs just order the arrests of individuals Americans
Speaker 2: apparently for being anti Semitic. But I will say there's
Speaker 2: a little bit more, you know, details to that story.
Speaker 2: But I thought, this anti Semitic arsen attack specifically on
Speaker 2: these Jewish volunteer ambulances that were apparently set on fire
Speaker 2: in London. You have this is Golden Gold Green, London
Speaker 2: apparently where these four ambulances were destroyed, and it's of
Speaker 2: Hetzla Northwest, which is a volunteer Jewish emergency service providing
Speaker 2: twenty four to seven medical aid. And if you look
Speaker 2: at the original reports from this apparent incident, you have
Speaker 2: Yeshiva World News right. This Wyn reporter was the first
Speaker 2: on the scene to document it publicly posting breaking News
Speaker 2: with on scene video footage at like two am, just
Speaker 2: after the London Fire Brigade apparently was called in and
Speaker 2: showed up to the deliberate arson on Highfield Road allegedly
Speaker 2: and so met Police confirmed it as an anti Semitic
Speaker 2: hate crime immediately on the scene with no injuries. And
Speaker 2: then instantly you had major publications follow suits and like
Speaker 2: CNN and Telegraph News and ABC just a few hours
Speaker 2: later citing the exact same scene with all the very
Speaker 2: similar details. Right and instantly, man, you see reports of
Speaker 2: Iranian passport found it burn site of Jewish ambulances in
Speaker 2: the UK, and this included a copy of mind comf
Speaker 2: okay also recovered intact in the burnt down vehicles. So
Speaker 2: tell me what that resembles in the instant memory that
Speaker 2: comes to mind in terms of nine to eleven and
Speaker 2: the uh the supernatural passports that evaded any sort of
Speaker 2: burn damage whenever they fell from the passenger airplanes. Right,
Speaker 2: It's just.
Speaker 11: Maybe it's more of an act of God.
Speaker 12: You know.
Speaker 10: You ever hear those stories about like when your grandma
Speaker 10: will be like, oh, then the house burnt down.
Speaker 11: But the Bible was still there.
Speaker 10: It's like supposed to be this weird twist of like,
Speaker 10: oh wow, the Lord works in mysterious ways, like Jane's
Speaker 10: your house burn down?
Speaker 2: Yeah, get rial with yourself, please, because.
Speaker 10: The mind comps by the blaze that we should all
Speaker 10: interpret something out of that. I don't know what a
Speaker 10: what an omen that is, but I think it means
Speaker 10: something a second coming.
Speaker 2: That's what we're meant to believe at this point. And
Speaker 2: I will say major escalation in the Iran war conflict,
Speaker 2: but we we can kind of set that aside for
Speaker 2: a brief moment because I think it's worth tabling just
Speaker 2: to address the fact that our buddy Jake Shields, right,
Speaker 2: I saw him post on this ambulance attack and he
Speaker 2: posts why did Jews have special ambulances just for them?
Speaker 2: And I thought that was a poignant you know, I.
Speaker 10: Bet you this is a bit speculation. But the first
Speaker 10: thing that came to mind that when you said that
Speaker 10: is I would I would put money on it.
Speaker 11: It's some sort.
Speaker 10: Of welfare scam, like it's some it's like it's whether
Speaker 10: it's a tax right off or what. And then they
Speaker 10: just get a fucking old old ass bread van. They
Speaker 10: call it an ambulance. They have like one one Jew
Speaker 10: maybe even their wife, you know, not even really like
Speaker 10: that the dude, you know, just like kind of you know,
Speaker 10: have a phone number and then they just somehow rake
Speaker 10: in some sort of welfare benefit of some sort. I mean,
Speaker 10: this is London, so that would totally check out that
Speaker 10: they have like a which you could kind of understand
Speaker 10: how bureaucracy would create some sort of situation like that
Speaker 10: where you're like, you know, put in trying to create
Speaker 10: the incentives for localities to take care of their own.
Speaker 10: But obviously there's a certain group of people that like
Speaker 10: to manipulate those sorts of things. To be fair, to
Speaker 10: be fair, I mean, I am an anarchist, so I
Speaker 10: think government by its own existence creates the situation that
Speaker 10: there's a rife for this sort of manipulation. But it
Speaker 10: doesn't mean you've got to be a piece of shit,
Speaker 10: yeah exactly.
Speaker 2: But I do think the fact that the very same organization,
Speaker 2: which is this Hetzela ambulances for Jewish communities, apparently there's
Speaker 2: one in New York, right and they basically offer this
Speaker 2: twenty four to seven ambulance service to the Jewish community specifically,
Speaker 2: and so New York Jews also have their own head
Speaker 2: Sala ambulances in ninety one. I found this to be
Speaker 2: kind of interesting. Race riots apparently erupted after a seven
Speaker 2: year old African American boy was hit by a car
Speaker 2: escorting a quote grand rabbi that ran a red light.
Speaker 2: The Hetzela ambulance loaded the Jewish car driver, but left
Speaker 2: the child behind to die in the street. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't know. I mean, obviously, take care of your
Speaker 2: own is the concept behind this organization that was in
Speaker 2: ninety one, So who knows how much they've evolved. I
Speaker 2: doubt very much, but you never know. I will say
Speaker 2: that there's a ABC News report on this specific case
Speaker 2: that I thought might be worthwhile because just the way
Speaker 2: in which they highlight and give Grant the spotlight two
Speaker 2: specifically hunting down anti Semites, right and basically this eruption
Speaker 2: and antisemitic propaganda and individuals on social media and things
Speaker 2: of that nature who are clearly this is exactly what
Speaker 2: we've been shouting from the rooftops for months at this point,
Speaker 2: I mean probably years by now about the justification, and
Speaker 2: I think it's effectively happening. The slippery slope is taking form,
Speaker 2: and we're kind of witnessing it happen in real time,
Speaker 2: but anyway, I'll share this real quick. Jewish volunteer ambulance
Speaker 2: is set on a fire in London, investigated as hate crime.
Speaker 9: ABC News Life First London police are investigating an alleged
Speaker 9: arts and attack on four ambulances run by a Jewish
Speaker 9: community center.
Speaker 12: Please say.
Speaker 9: It happened early this morning in the city's Golders Green section.
Speaker 9: Authorities are reviewing this CCTV showing the moment they were
Speaker 9: set on fire. Now police say the attacks being treated
Speaker 9: as an anti Semitic hate crime and they're searching for
Speaker 9: three suspects. Are Maggie Ruley's in London with more. Hi, Maggie,
Speaker 9: So please say they're aware of an online claim from
Speaker 9: a group taking responsibility to the attack. What's the latest
Speaker 9: on the investigation.
Speaker 13: Hey, Dianielle. Right now, this investigation is still ongoing, but
Speaker 13: as you know in the arson attack overnight, it is
Speaker 13: being treated as an antisemitic hate crime. There's four ambulances
Speaker 13: belonging to a Jewish volunteer emergency service. They were set
Speaker 13: on fire, causing the oxygen canisters to explode. That fire
Speaker 13: happened right outside a synagogue, as you mentioned the Golders Grain.
Speaker 13: It's a traditionally Jewish neighborhood in North London. A witnesses
Speaker 13: say they saw three people approach the ambulance right before
Speaker 13: the fire, and police confirm that they're currently going over
Speaker 13: and going through surveillance footage. Now the counter terrorism police
Speaker 13: are in instigating the Dan at this point, no arrests
Speaker 13: they made.
Speaker 9: Police say they're going to step up their support for
Speaker 9: Jewish communities in London. But we're also seeing other attacks
Speaker 9: on Jewish communities around the world. How are people reacting
Speaker 9: to that?
Speaker 13: You know, this is what's concerning Diana. I mean this
Speaker 13: month alone, there have been multiple attacks on Jewish sites
Speaker 13: around the world. Multiple in the Netherlands alone, including an
Speaker 13: explosion in a Jewish school in Amsterdam. Gunmen opened fire
Speaker 13: on three synagogues in Toronto and Belgium. A synagogue was
Speaker 13: bombed and attack targeting the Jewish community was thwarted in
Speaker 13: France and then Dan. Of course, there was that perfect
Speaker 13: attack in the States in Detroit, a man driving his
Speaker 13: truck into a synagogue with dozens of children inside the time.
Speaker 13: Now none were hurt. The suspects family in that in
Speaker 13: that incident was killed in a, whoa, whoa whoa back
Speaker 13: up in many experts.
Speaker 10: Are they talking about that thing from the other week?
Speaker 10: There were kids in the car that was not reported initially.
Speaker 10: That's new, Sorry not to I just thought that was
Speaker 10: significant because that that's definitely a whole different new wrinkle
Speaker 10: in the story there.
Speaker 2: Okay, did they just mention that a member of the
Speaker 2: suspects family wound up dead apparently in the following days,
Speaker 2: because that would also be very interesting. But again, what
Speaker 2: what does this reflect? I mean, it's anti semitic gladiol worldwide,
Speaker 2: That's honestly what it feels like, in a real way,
Speaker 2: some way of deflecting away from the ongoing genocide and
Speaker 2: current ongoing conflict in Iran, which is clearly stoking a
Speaker 2: worldwide I mean, this is this is World War three
Speaker 2: in its early stages in my opinion, right, And as
Speaker 2: much as people would like to act as if this
Speaker 2: is some you know, far off h yeah, yeah, dystolcohol.
Speaker 10: Maybe assuming he's alive, is going to drop a nuke?
Speaker 10: So I mean, actually not even assuming regardless of whether
Speaker 10: he's alive or not, they're they're gonna have I think
Speaker 10: they're gonna drop a nuke and I wouldn't even actually
Speaker 10: be surprised if the hand gets overplayed, if that, if
Speaker 10: BB ends up in some sort of scapegoat, which would
Speaker 10: even more lead into the fact that he may not
Speaker 10: even be alives.
Speaker 11: They just kind of squeeze.
Speaker 10: It out long enough until they're ready to play their
Speaker 10: scapegoat plan.
Speaker 2: So I will say whether or not Netna Who is
Speaker 2: dead is I mean, it's not. It honestly doesn't even
Speaker 2: matter at this point right as much as that it
Speaker 2: seems like the ultimate purpose of the net Naho proof
Speaker 2: of life conspiracy was to ultimately weaponize this narrative and
Speaker 2: concept in general in a certain sense, not not as
Speaker 2: if that's the priority and the number one you know,
Speaker 2: a factor in the agenda that they're pursuing. I highly
Speaker 2: doubt it. But why would that not be a convenient
Speaker 2: consequence of the outcome in itself, right of people who
Speaker 2: I don't know it took debait. Whether you believe it
Speaker 2: or not, I do think it's it's being utilized and
Speaker 2: leveraged against the public in that very sense, in terms
Speaker 2: of the debunking of net and Who's alleged death right,
Speaker 2: which obviously has been reported by mainstream publications, so they're
Speaker 2: pushing back in a real way.
Speaker 11: And I just a comment on that real quick.
Speaker 10: I just think that the big takeaway for our people
Speaker 10: is just don't be retarded, like realize the landscape, you know,
Speaker 10: be willing to express what you know in a you know,
Speaker 10: relatively accurate way. I mean, obviously, you know, people are
Speaker 10: living their lives. You can't go to great pains to like,
Speaker 10: you know, specificity for your language at all times, but
Speaker 10: generally speaking, like yeah, if you're somebody out there, yep,
Speaker 10: you know who's dead, or even the opposite of like there's.
Speaker 11: No fucking way he's dead.
Speaker 14: There's no way he do.
Speaker 10: Like either way, you're kind of you're kind of an
Speaker 10: idiot and you're kind of playing into It's just be like, yeah,
Speaker 10: we're in a current landscape with the information situation where uh,
Speaker 10: we're kind of in a post reality state, and so
Speaker 10: it's and even then you can kind of make the
Speaker 10: point that it's really kind of irrelevant whether it's BB
Speaker 10: or whether it's the government of Israel, it's all the
Speaker 10: same difference. Uh, but you can still be honest about
Speaker 10: them and be like, I don't know, it could be
Speaker 10: fucking dead. Maybe he's not, which is kind of what
Speaker 10: me and you have been saying, which is like the
Speaker 10: I mean, who fucking knows he could be like, hey, yeah,
Speaker 10: it looks fishy. I wouldn't at least been surprised he's dead.
Speaker 10: But we don't have to in any way commit to
Speaker 10: the fact he's dead. It's really kind of a red airring.
Speaker 10: Seems to be completely beside the.
Speaker 2: Point, right, And I think I mean I said as
Speaker 2: much the other day. I think I was just talking
Speaker 2: to my wife and and venting and in a way,
Speaker 2: but I pretty much outlined the fact that you know,
Speaker 2: it doesn't matter whatsoever whether Netna Who's dead or not.
Speaker 2: We're all focused and bogged down on this nonsensical debate
Speaker 2: that in reality, this is a this is a puppet
Speaker 2: on a string in net Ya who. He's in no
Speaker 2: way right behind any of these policies in general, as
Speaker 2: far as the manufacturing the policies. And he's just a
Speaker 2: face of of the regime and and has been for
Speaker 2: far too long.
Speaker 10: And and he's not even the most extreme of his
Speaker 10: uh of his coalition, like not even close. Like, if anything,
Speaker 10: he's kind of somewhat moderate, maybe a little bit more
Speaker 10: on the on the like a stronger side of things.
Speaker 10: But yeah, you look at Simodrid, you look at Israel Cats,
Speaker 10: you look at a who else am I thinking of
Speaker 10: Ben Gavie?
Speaker 11: Like look at the crazy shit they say?
Speaker 10: And those are all members of this cabinet, So like
Speaker 10: those aren't like nobody's I don't know how many members
Speaker 10: are in a cabinet, but that's like three members of
Speaker 10: the cabinet right there. Every single one of them is
Speaker 10: far more explicit in their you know, overtly genocidal language
Speaker 10: when you know, and uh, this is kind of ends
Speaker 10: up who gets their way, and uh, neo is actually
Speaker 10: kind of the more somewhat more palatable.
Speaker 11: Version of all that.
Speaker 10: So if you can believe it, and they're probably gonna
Speaker 10: scapegoat it in an act, maybe put some sort of
Speaker 10: other figure that kind of is sort of known for
Speaker 10: being a liberal over there, which let's be real, a
Speaker 10: liberal over there. When they say that, they mean somebody's
Speaker 10: actually still pretty pretty crazy.
Speaker 11: With some of that shit.
Speaker 10: He's just slightly more palatable so that we'll probably essentially
Speaker 10: get their own version of Obama after they you know,
Speaker 10: pass off all the bad juju on ntan Yahoo. When
Speaker 10: that didn't even matter to begin with, because, like I said,
Speaker 10: you know, you look at their coalition, especially the way
Speaker 10: that their politics are structured, like that is that's the coalition.
Speaker 10: That's that's I mean, regardless of who you have leading it,
Speaker 10: that's gonna end up being what probably ends up happening.
Speaker 2: So exactly, and Natanya, who you saw that press conference, right,
Speaker 2: he comes out and publicly reveals himself for the first
Speaker 2: time and in quite quite a while, and and the
Speaker 2: first thing he says is, first of all, I just
Speaker 2: want to say I'm alive, and you're all witnesses. And
Speaker 2: then it was in that very same public statement that
Speaker 2: he basically says Jesus Christ has no advantage over Jengis
Speaker 2: Khan because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough,
Speaker 2: evil will overcome good. And it was just very strong,
Speaker 2: strange language on that.
Speaker 10: Same that same speech he was talking about how Iran
Speaker 10: but he was doing this like language that like like
Speaker 10: what the fuck are you talking about, where he's saying
Speaker 10: stuff like oh, you'll see you'll see blackmail that you've
Speaker 10: never even been able to imagine before, and like he
Speaker 10: doesn't explicitly say Iran, but that's kind of the implication
Speaker 10: given of like what he just said, but you also
Speaker 10: can kind of some of the things he's saying completely understand.
Speaker 10: This is like, bitch, this is what we're going to
Speaker 10: do with you. And he's mentioning thing. I think even
Speaker 10: said something some sort of vague language about like weapons
Speaker 10: of mass destruction or something like that, kind of implying.
Speaker 10: I mean, I don't know, I wouldn't be I really do. Hell,
Speaker 10: even Trump put out a true social very recently, I
Speaker 10: forget specifically, he said something along the lines alluding to
Speaker 10: weapons of mass destruction and kind of saying, we have
Speaker 10: all the cards. So now I don't I actually don't
Speaker 10: think that the United States would be the one who
Speaker 10: dropped a nuke in this situation, but they're already throwing
Speaker 10: it out there, and I think if Israel does it,
Speaker 10: I really do think that they'll probably be almost certainly
Speaker 10: completely in the know. You know, we get this, we
Speaker 10: get this fiction thrown about that Trump's being led by
Speaker 10: the nose, but I think that's big time, major cope.
Speaker 10: Like maybe he doesn't want one hundred percent exactly the
Speaker 10: game plan that the Jews were rolling with, uh, but
Speaker 10: like I mean, maybe he would wish it to be different.
Speaker 12: Uh.
Speaker 10: And yeah, maybe there's a blackmail component that causes him
Speaker 10: to somewhat fall in line, but I think it was
Speaker 10: to some degree. This is kind of the known plan.
Speaker 10: I mean, maybe there's a minor detour detour, I don't
Speaker 10: I don't really feel like you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I read this report that basically claimed that when
Speaker 2: Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner were meeting with Iran, Uh,
Speaker 2: basically Iran thought it was very strange and and made
Speaker 2: the statement to to Uh, I mean basically say as
Speaker 2: much right where they thought the fact that they didn't
Speaker 2: the Americans didn't provide or bring any nuclear experts into
Speaker 2: the negotiations. UH, that that that was very strange just
Speaker 2: at face value. That clearly the implication was they had
Speaker 2: no real intention of acting in good faith as far
Speaker 2: as the negotiations were concerned. So, I mean, the Yeah,
Speaker 2: the fact of the matter is this was doomed to
Speaker 2: fail from the start. This conflict was on the table
Speaker 2: from day one, and we warned as much the moment
Speaker 2: Trump took office, I think maybe even before that, as
Speaker 2: far as not to take any strange victory lap because
Speaker 2: obviously the outcome is is absolutely dystopian. The point being
Speaker 2: how people don't see this for what it is earlier
Speaker 2: on and continually fall for this right, just kind of
Speaker 2: smoking mirrors and yeah, very naive and vulnerable outlook on
Speaker 2: the paradigm of power in general. It's it's frustrating to see.
Speaker 2: But I will say, to fuel the speculation on net
Speaker 2: Ya whose proof of life conspiracy, you have his son
Speaker 2: suddenly basically after net now who cancels his plans at
Speaker 2: Seapack just before the basically this happened right, This was
Speaker 2: on March twenty first that I saw this basically post
Speaker 2: and yes, so Netna who suddenly cancels his plans to
Speaker 2: go to sepack and then you have his son replace
Speaker 2: him yay er not net and Yahoo. And this happened
Speaker 2: in Hungary, and it was a strange interview that I
Speaker 2: saw of him. It was very short. But still the
Speaker 2: fact of the matter is I kind of looked at
Speaker 2: this as just as far as certain prominent personalities that
Speaker 2: kind of at the very least they wield some sort
Speaker 2: of influence right in the publics, just as far as
Speaker 2: public perception, right just in terms of their platform in general,
Speaker 2: like a Joe Rogan, for example, who have become almost
Speaker 2: the target of these attempted just as far as damaging
Speaker 2: the credibility of individuals such as this, and I'm not
Speaker 2: setting him up on some pedestal in any way. As
Speaker 2: far as this specific content text, I just saw it
Speaker 2: and we sort of predicted it in terms of net
Speaker 2: yaw Who's proof of life conspiracy and honestly not mattering
Speaker 2: at this point, because it seems like the ultimate purpose
Speaker 2: was to weaponize the narrative in the concept in general,
Speaker 2: and I saw that playing out in a certain sense
Speaker 2: as far as prominent profiles on social media coming out
Speaker 2: and making these, you know, streaming crocodile tears about how
Speaker 2: they used to love Joe Rogan and what a shame
Speaker 2: using this example of Joe claiming that he thinks Netanya
Speaker 2: Who's dead and Netanya Who's brother's dead potentially as well
Speaker 2: whenever he made that claim on one of the shows recently.
Speaker 2: But anyway, I just thought, once again, we're we're in
Speaker 2: this strange, you know, post reality phase right where we
Speaker 2: have legitimately entered this cartoonish, just again lego themed state
Speaker 2: sponsored war propaganda like that is actually entering a cartoonish
Speaker 2: phase of post reality that we never at least I
Speaker 2: never personally thought possible in my own lifetime. I never
Speaker 2: really considered it. But at the same point, it's like,
Speaker 2: wouldn't you imagine you would want to at the very
Speaker 2: least present yourself to the public in a more professional way.
Speaker 2: But I mean, we're pushing just as far as the
Speaker 2: concept of allowable opinion into yes, this very just almost
Speaker 2: it's a childish version of reality that I think the
Speaker 2: vast majority of Americans are kind of like eager to
Speaker 2: accept and embrace. And I find that concerning considering the circumstances.
Speaker 11: But yeah, a lot of people were falling for the slop.
Speaker 10: I didn't want address something I keep seeing in the chat,
Speaker 10: and I maybe and maybe I shouldn't even let me
Speaker 10: bother me, although it's not really that big of a deal.
Speaker 10: I just saw somebody in the chat, which I guess
Speaker 10: is apt with the sort of show that we run,
Speaker 10: kind of like, well, nuke's aren't real, nukes aren't real,
Speaker 10: nukes aren't real. This is an agrigor, you know, So
Speaker 10: no this matters. Nukes are real. I mean, maybe I
Speaker 10: put putting a little bit of words, but I would
Speaker 10: you know, once again to kind of in the same
Speaker 10: same vein as the whole BB thing. I kind of
Speaker 10: think it almost doesn't fucking matter whether nukes are real
Speaker 10: or not, because if you if you assume that nukes
Speaker 10: aren't real, then let's be real here, the play here
Speaker 10: is some sort of orchestrated theater to to do nukes,
Speaker 10: whatever that means to you, because they've done this before
Speaker 10: and this seems like the game plan that's rolling out
Speaker 10: in front of us. So even if you're someone who
Speaker 10: doesn't believe in nukes, like it's like you would, then
Speaker 10: you're I assume the theory is that they somehow faked
Speaker 10: that they just had big explosions.
Speaker 11: They called it nukes.
Speaker 10: They somehow they got people on with that narrative, and
Speaker 10: it kind of doesn't matter. It's so either way, they're
Speaker 10: going to do something that's really bad. Is a big
Speaker 10: is a big boom, it's a big scary and it's
Speaker 10: gonna be the big, the big next you know, uh
Speaker 10: political you know thing, the big geopolitical move.
Speaker 11: So whether that's real or.
Speaker 10: Not kind of beside the point, kind of the same
Speaker 10: idea that's like whether Bebe's real, alive or not kind
Speaker 10: of also beside the point, I mean, sure, I guess
Speaker 10: if you could prove with both, if you could prove
Speaker 10: one way or the other, it would kind of matter.
Speaker 10: But in the fact it doesn't really matter all that much.
Speaker 10: So I mean, whether it's big scary nukes or fake
Speaker 10: and if they're all tricking us, I guess it's preferable,
Speaker 10: but they're still going to try a trick you all
Speaker 10: the same likely, this is my look at it.
Speaker 2: So I agree, But I mean, every time I have
Speaker 2: this conversation with Sam, it's it's interesting because I completely
Speaker 2: am open to the idea of uh, you know, sort
Speaker 2: of the nuclear reaction and the and the post nuclear
Speaker 2: essentially after the blast, and and the consequences of of
Speaker 2: just that the environment and things of that nature, although
Speaker 2: he always points out how Japan just resettled so quickly
Speaker 2: after the blast took place and seemingly didn't really suffer
Speaker 2: too many consequences, which is an interesting But I do
Speaker 2: know the footage of the tests right are clearly some
Speaker 2: of them are faked and obviously produced to Lookout Mountain Laboratory.
Speaker 2: I think that that in itself is where they filmed
Speaker 2: the moon landing in my opinion. So I do think
Speaker 2: that a lot of what we just kind of have
Speaker 2: accepted over the course and just as far as recorded
Speaker 2: history in terms of this technological phase of advancement in
Speaker 2: military operations. Obviously we can agree that they have the
Speaker 2: capability to create massive explosions that have catastrophic just human toll,
Speaker 2: right in terms of the casualties, and that alone matters.
Speaker 2: And I think as long as we can agree that
Speaker 2: that exists and is a true unfortunate threat, then what
Speaker 2: does it really matter? You know, as far as like
Speaker 2: once again we're at that same crossroads of like, well,
Speaker 2: we don't have to necessarily agree that nuclear warheads exist, right,
Speaker 2: and the capability, uh is it has legitimately been achieved.
Speaker 2: But we can at the very least agree upon the
Speaker 2: the insane capability of the military operations in terms of
Speaker 2: the permanent establishment and what they can engage in in
Speaker 2: terms of the human cost and war, and and that
Speaker 2: alone is what matters most I think should should be
Speaker 2: paramount And and at the end of the day, we
Speaker 2: we can kind of table and couch the the the
Speaker 2: details and and yeah, semantics in terms of that. But
Speaker 2: but I will say, man, what Trump came out and
Speaker 2: made a statement. Mission accomplished. He declares a victory over Iran. Uh,
Speaker 2: the war has.
Speaker 10: Super important to read the fine print, guys, super duper important.
Speaker 10: He in fact, we are in fact not ceaseeing all
Speaker 10: hostilities in factory. He said, he said, is that they
Speaker 10: were looking. He was, they were in talks to make
Speaker 10: a deal. And even then he wasn't even really talking
Speaker 10: about ceasing hostilities specifically. What he's saying he was going
Speaker 10: to do. What in fact he was actually doing, was
Speaker 10: saying he was not going to attack the energy facilities,
Speaker 10: you know, civilian infrastructure, like he said he was going
Speaker 10: to do. Forty eight hours prior, he gave a big
Speaker 10: warning that if they don't open the straight of removes,
Speaker 10: that's what he's gonna do.
Speaker 11: But nothing changed.
Speaker 10: And yet despite that, he's still on you know Monday
Speaker 10: rate before markets open up. Ever so conveniently says, I'm
Speaker 10: gonna give it a five day break before I actually
Speaker 10: do this thing I said I was gonna do forty
Speaker 10: eight hours ago. You know the thing motioning rate went
Speaker 10: right when markets closed that thing I did before, you
Speaker 10: know that that raised the ante. Uh, just just saying
Speaker 10: it's just a little it's it's it's gonna read the
Speaker 10: fine print. In fact, the war is still on. He's
Speaker 10: just not going to bomb energy infrastructure as he said
Speaker 10: he was going to do, and give it a little
Speaker 10: bit of a five day break to see what shakes out.
Speaker 11: Because they're totally talking.
Speaker 10: They're totally in talks, despite the fact everyone every one
Speaker 10: of the Iranian leadership says they're non talks. But Trump
Speaker 10: does said they are talking to somebody. Uh, but he's
Speaker 10: not gonna say who because they ain't want of them killed.
Speaker 10: There were leaked from Axios that said it was some
Speaker 10: I think like, uh, you know one of the speakers
Speaker 10: of their whatever, one of their higher ups over in Iran,
Speaker 10: who immediately went the fuck I did.
Speaker 7: So.
Speaker 10: Uh it seems like they just be saying shit. Uh
Speaker 10: into the weekend. Wars have begun one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: Buddy here, Actually, let me just finish this video so
Speaker 2: we can get it off the screen and then, uh.
Speaker 11: Real quick, Actually, do want one little commentary before it
Speaker 11: to escapes my mind?
Speaker 12: Uh?
Speaker 10: You did Mentionine, this is like a worldwide gladio thing.
Speaker 10: At first, before they went on about all the different
Speaker 10: stuff going on around the world, I thought it was
Speaker 10: particularly interesting.
Speaker 11: This is reminent reminiscent.
Speaker 10: I mean, this isn't some great, big point making here,
Speaker 10: but this is reminiscent to me of the stuff that
Speaker 10: was going on astray Rate before the Bondie Beach stuff
Speaker 10: popped off that we covered here, where they had bombing
Speaker 10: of ambulances, some some jew ambulance got set on fire,
Speaker 10: and they're you know, conveniently as a perfect little fucking
Speaker 10: video of like, look here it is sort of on fire,
Speaker 10: and oh cool, We're gonna probably get some insurance money
Speaker 10: now and attention and probably with some sort of welfare
Speaker 10: scam to begin with. So uh and then you know,
Speaker 10: lo and behold, we have some super sketchy attacks. Ask
Speaker 10: no questions about that. Nothing weird going on there. But
Speaker 10: now we're seeing this around the world. We're seeing these
Speaker 10: low level anti Semitic hate crimes seemingly bubbling up all
Speaker 10: at the same time. So it makes me a little
Speaker 10: bit concerned, especially since at least before we had the
Speaker 10: consideration of it kind of being localized, so whereas now
Speaker 10: it is just kind of all over the fucking place,
Speaker 10: so we can't even really get get a feeling on
Speaker 10: where this is going to pop off at but I
Speaker 10: have a feeling something's gonna pop bof organic or otherwise,
Speaker 10: so because both are believable.
Speaker 2: Exactly, and especially when it's such a valuable tool in
Speaker 2: terms of moving this dystopian agenda forward. Anti Semitism is
Speaker 2: just the perfect element in terms of well, just the
Speaker 2: perfect ingredient in the recipe that they're pursuing as far
Speaker 2: as what they're they're attempting to implement, and and uh,
Speaker 2: really I think create a pretext and it very much
Speaker 2: established the precedent in a in a way in which
Speaker 2: they can rely upon moving into the future. And and
Speaker 2: we're seeing it firsthand and in a real way. I mean,
Speaker 2: even even the strike that my YouTube perceived was was
Speaker 2: basically because of the context of what we're discussing, I think,
Speaker 2: and that that applies directly to this, uh in a
Speaker 2: in a real way. So it's undeniable at this point.
Speaker 2: But yeah, I think it's just a few seconds left
Speaker 2: on this war in the.
Speaker 13: Middle East right now as fuel for these attacks. But
Speaker 13: now the country is far from the Middle East. Are
Speaker 13: being left a scrambling trying to increase security in the
Speaker 13: Jewish community, trying to thwart these attacks from happening.
Speaker 9: Dan, all right, Maggie really for us in London, thank you?
Speaker 11: All right, real quick, I want to address something in
Speaker 11: the chat.
Speaker 10: This is something. This is another one. I shouldn't be
Speaker 10: doing this, but I saw it and I wanted this.
Speaker 10: We've addressed this a few times. The person here says,
Speaker 10: why do you link Tim Russer's interview with W with
Speaker 10: his death? They happened years apart. Kind of misleading. No,
Speaker 10: he's referring to something in our intro, which I will
Speaker 10: I will say I didn't make it, and I'm technologically retarded.
Speaker 11: I don't even know how to edit it, nor I
Speaker 11: don't know if I would want to.
Speaker 10: We've talked about this before because we kind of looked
Speaker 10: into a lot of those little little all the little
Speaker 10: bits in some of their I'm pretty sure we've looked
Speaker 10: into basically every little little story in there at some point,
Speaker 10: and yeah, the Tim Russer one, it is kind of
Speaker 10: a little bit bullshit. It was a little bit misleading.
Speaker 10: We didn't know, and we looked at it later we're like,
Speaker 10: oh shit, that was like years apart. But whatever, I
Speaker 10: guess you could say that's our a little bit of
Speaker 10: a that's our little test for you guys. As I said,
Speaker 10: don't be retarded, don't take everything at face value. But whatever,
Speaker 10: it's a little fun. It does it teases that the
Speaker 10: the secret society aspect of this stuff.
Speaker 11: I don't know. Yes, if it was up to me,
Speaker 11: if I was gonna be a hundred, I would. I'm
Speaker 11: not gonna lie you.
Speaker 10: There's a little bit of autism in me that kind
Speaker 10: of goes. But whatever I think, it out weighs it.
Speaker 10: It's a fun choice and whatever. I guess it's a
Speaker 10: little bit of a quality filter. If you someone or
Speaker 10: our audience that were like, oh, isn't it crazy that
Speaker 10: totally killed Tim Russeller it, I'd be like, did they really?
Speaker 15: Though?
Speaker 10: Yeah, maybe they did. I wouldn't be surprised if they did.
Speaker 10: But maybe you should maybe raise the brain cells a
Speaker 10: little bit. I don't know, but yes, whatever it hits though,
Speaker 10: it's what the people.
Speaker 2: Want, absolutely, And that's the main point is that it's
Speaker 2: it's an amazing intro and and it's a great edit
Speaker 2: and uh and and that's the point we should continue
Speaker 2: to use it. But as far as Tim Russell, like
Speaker 2: I do think it's it's worthwhile and looking up what
Speaker 2: he was reporting on just before his death as well,
Speaker 2: because if you if you've noticed, I mean, there's a
Speaker 2: theme there in terms of Michael Hastings, I mean, Danny Casilero.
Speaker 2: There are are very many different examples, even just in
Speaker 2: the edit alone, that that you can point to that
Speaker 2: were clearly journalists who were in a way suicided or
Speaker 2: martyred for for pursuing a story that was not at
Speaker 2: all meant to ever go public. And uh, and once
Speaker 2: you you catch a real and let's just say, evidentiary
Speaker 2: glimpse and and have sources that are credible enough to
Speaker 2: go on the record and and blow the lid off
Speaker 2: of the network itself and reveal it to the public,
Speaker 2: then your life becomes I mean, it's at stake, and
Speaker 2: it's in jeopardy. And I think that's something that is
Speaker 2: very worthwhile and in noticing in terms of that edit.
Speaker 2: But meanwhile, we are also not only declaring victory over Iran,
Speaker 2: but we're also roaming free over Tehran according to Trump,
Speaker 2: and and we can do whatever we want. So I
Speaker 2: just find the language that they use at this point,
Speaker 2: and and the fact that so many people are kind
Speaker 2: of tuned out to it at this point, it doesn't
Speaker 2: really resonate as much as it used to and and uh,
Speaker 2: but also the base appreciates it, and it's something they
Speaker 2: can kind of feel comfortable and safe and knowing that
Speaker 2: they have this strong man, uh, you know, representing their
Speaker 2: their ideology and their their principles. But it's all faking
Speaker 2: gay exactly. And that's something that I think people should
Speaker 2: should finally just remove the naive veil for themselves and
Speaker 2: and recognize the truth of what the uh, the system
Speaker 2: has become. They're they're asking the current administration is seeking
Speaker 2: two hundred million, billion billion dollars and additional funding right
Speaker 2: uh for for the Iran war, which is just the
Speaker 2: most ridiculous. I mean, I thought the war was over, right,
Speaker 2: Trump just just declared victory. But at the same time
Speaker 2: he seemed.
Speaker 10: To put that just to give a frame of reference people,
Speaker 10: because the people it just seems like made up numbers.
Speaker 10: And you're talking about this big money two hundred billion.
Speaker 10: To put that in in in the context, it's one
Speaker 10: the current Department of War budget is one trillion dollars
Speaker 10: for the year.
Speaker 11: And that was a huge improvement. I say improvements the
Speaker 11: wrong word, but.
Speaker 10: Huge increase for the previous year, which I want to
Speaker 10: say was like around six or seven hundred thousand or
Speaker 10: something like that, and they're already asking for one point
Speaker 10: five trillion next year. But just to give you a
Speaker 10: frame of reference, so two hundred billion in what the
Speaker 10: past couple of weeks or so is essentially what we're
Speaker 10: incurring where that two hundred billion is coming from. And
Speaker 10: that's a few weeks that essentially are comprised of about
Speaker 10: a fifth of our current yearly rate of the Department
Speaker 10: of War and by previous standards about a third.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 10: And keep in mind, we have an incredibly insanely bloated
Speaker 10: military even before these increases. Despite we always get this
Speaker 10: gay little fucking rhetoric every fucking year from every fucking
Speaker 10: president about oh, we're gonna work on improving our military,
Speaker 10: and then we have like the largest military bar none.
Speaker 11: It just there's there's just even then.
Speaker 10: But people that have this idea that we have heard
Speaker 10: her biggest military, that's exponentially larger, so we should be
Speaker 10: able to be like a goddamn army of homelanders that
Speaker 10: can just do whatever the fuck they want. But it's
Speaker 10: still like that, even even when you have this overwhelming force,
Speaker 10: it doesn't mean you can unless you're just willing to
Speaker 10: throw people in the meat grinder and you just give
Speaker 10: no fucks whatsoever. Uh, You're you're you're not gonna be
Speaker 10: We're not gonna like take over carg Island or whatever.
Speaker 11: The fuck.
Speaker 10: I mean, you can, but there's cost to that. So, like,
Speaker 10: just because you have this overwhelming military, especially in this
Speaker 10: current paradigm where we have dis and things have become
Speaker 10: so decentralized, it's like, I mean, you mean, hell, you
Speaker 10: look at the warfare going on. It's all this interceptor
Speaker 10: missiles versus these shaw Head drones that are like, you know,
Speaker 10: ten thousand bucks to make or whatever, and then we're
Speaker 10: dropping was it like five hundred thousand or some incredible
Speaker 10: and some insane shit for the interceptors. So it's like
Speaker 10: it just the math doesn't math. It's just like, just
Speaker 10: because you have overwhelming force, it doesn't mean you can
Speaker 10: just whip your dick around and get whatever the fuck
Speaker 10: you want.
Speaker 14: Yeah, so I do know.
Speaker 10: Just sorry, I'm ready. It's just insane. It's insane when
Speaker 10: you put all this stuff in a you give it
Speaker 10: a reference point for.
Speaker 2: It hardly quantify these numbers when honestly, just as far
Speaker 2: as you know, the average budget of you know, just
Speaker 2: as far as the general public in America, it's uh,
Speaker 2: it's it's once again very hard to conceptualize, I think,
Speaker 2: and that alone loses the effect in a way, right
Speaker 2: as far as just the statistics and the numbers and
Speaker 2: the data that's that's presented to the public, it almost
Speaker 2: you see their eyes glaze over in a real way.
Speaker 2: And and that's just become public sentiment just in terms
Speaker 2: of politics essentially, and they're either fully entrenched in their
Speaker 2: ideological uh, you know, bipartisan view or or yeah, they
Speaker 2: just aren't engaging whatsoever and essentially letting it it just
Speaker 2: fly by in the in the overwhelming news cycle so
Speaker 2: of the week. So there's basically no public support for
Speaker 2: this conflict. At the very same time, as much as
Speaker 2: it sounds like doom and gloom in terms of just uh,
Speaker 2: the intellect of the the average American, there's definitely no
Speaker 2: interest in the deployment of US ground troops in the region. Right.
Speaker 2: But yet that is precisely what Trump seems to be
Speaker 2: presenting is the only option to bring it into the war.
Speaker 2: While he's simultaneously declaring, uh, you know, victory. It's a
Speaker 2: very strange dynamic to watch play out, but it's hard
Speaker 2: not to notice that whenever you have I think I
Speaker 2: saw like a seven. There was a poll which it's
Speaker 2: hard to believe the poll data, obviously, obviously, but this
Speaker 2: is a Reuters report which claimed on March nineteenth, sixty
Speaker 2: five percent of Americans believe US President Donald Trump will
Speaker 2: order troops into a large scale ground war in Iran,
Speaker 2: but only seven percent support the idea. And this is
Speaker 2: according to a Reuters IPSOS poll that closed on Thursday,
Speaker 2: March nineteenth. So the three day poll showed Trump's broader
Speaker 2: standing with the public holding largely unchanged at forty percent,
Speaker 2: up one percentage point from a Reuter's poll carried out
Speaker 2: in hours after the US Israel attacked Iran on February
Speaker 2: twenty eighth, So this was like a poll that gathered
Speaker 2: up to fifteen hundred plus US adults nationwide, had a
Speaker 2: margin of era of about three percentage points, so give
Speaker 2: or take, but anyway, I thought it was interesting and
Speaker 2: worthwhile in pointing out the fact that there's absolutely no
Speaker 2: public support, and I appreciate that much, and I think
Speaker 2: all of us should. And and I think anti war
Speaker 2: dot Com even ran an article basically saying, yeah, it
Speaker 2: was Kyle Ansloon the very same day actually that that
Speaker 2: Reuter's report came out, and he basically says the majority
Speaker 2: of Americans believe war against the Iran benefits Israel more
Speaker 2: than the US and then goes into fifty six percent
Speaker 2: of voters said the war benefits Israel Moore only twenty
Speaker 2: nine percent said the conflict benefited the US more.
Speaker 12: So.
Speaker 2: Yeah, again, it's it's convenient cannon fodder for the the
Speaker 2: ideological two party paradigm. Right, this this this spectrum that's
Speaker 2: being further entrenched in an unfortunate way where it's it's
Speaker 2: convene need for the left to obviously be dissenting voices
Speaker 2: in terms of this conflict. I'm talking about the voter
Speaker 2: uh right, just as far as like the the the
Speaker 2: voter base of the of the Democratic Party in a
Speaker 2: way right, who's still very much engaging in the system.
Speaker 2: I think this helps them become further entrenched and re
Speaker 2: engage in a real way in the systematic structure of
Speaker 2: of just of voting in general. And and that is
Speaker 2: is always the way in which the pendulum swings. And
Speaker 2: I find that to be a problematic. But you know,
Speaker 2: what are we to do with that? You know, with that, honestly.
Speaker 2: But anyway, so Trump's sending obviously when he's he's authorized
Speaker 2: ground troops essentially to to uh send to the region,
Speaker 2: and we have thousands more that are heading over there,
Speaker 2: and and uh once again, it's just not even really
Speaker 2: being being discussed other than right the kind of usual
Speaker 2: suspects as far as people who already are completely adverse
Speaker 2: or against an opposed to the conflict at large, they
Speaker 2: are very much vocal in the current moment. But other
Speaker 2: than that, no public sentiment is being swayed either way
Speaker 2: at this point. And I do find that unfortunate as well,
Speaker 2: because meanwhile, you have a cigarette burns and an infant
Speaker 2: toddler being tortured in Gaza by the IDF basically what
Speaker 2: cigarette burns and nail wounds and toddler to allegedly coerce
Speaker 2: the father. I looked into this just briefly, and you
Speaker 2: have a one year old child tortured in Al Magazi
Speaker 2: to pressure the detained father during interrogation. Israeli occupation soldiers
Speaker 2: subjected this one year old child to torture in central
Speaker 2: Gaza to force his father into making confessions. And basically
Speaker 2: the child is identified as Kareem Abunasar who detained. He
Speaker 2: was detained near the Almagazi refugee camp after his father,
Speaker 2: Osama Abunasar, was caught in gunfire while attempting to buy supplies.
Speaker 2: So the fact that it was like ten hours before
Speaker 2: they released this this child and handed uh handed him
Speaker 2: over to his family, and so apparently throughout that process
Speaker 2: you had you had them go I mean stooped to
Speaker 2: an insane just I mean, obviously this is happening so
Speaker 2: very often that that this is just one great example
Speaker 2: we can spotlight and and hopefully make people a little
Speaker 2: bit more aware of the level of just human rights
Speaker 2: violations all throughout God. But not only that. You think
Speaker 2: this won't you think this won't extend to Lebanon, to
Speaker 2: all these various you know, regional conflicts.
Speaker 10: Yeah, Lebanon, Syria. They're they're attacking, which is the Syrian
Speaker 10: stuff as wild because they were you know, the HTS,
Speaker 10: you know, the essentially the al Qaeda group that's running
Speaker 10: that running that nation had rated that kind of the
Speaker 10: start had signaled. So I obviously don't know specifically what
Speaker 10: they meant by it, but they signaled essentially some level
Speaker 10: of solidarity and again being against Hasbela and Lebanon. And
Speaker 10: then there was these reports so kind of shortly after
Speaker 10: that that, you know, I think the US was apparently
Speaker 10: rumored to be pressuring Syria behind the behind the curtain
Speaker 10: to kind of like get them involved to help Israel,
Speaker 10: and the reports were that they weren't really having it. Obviously,
Speaker 10: I do think there's some degree they little bit are
Speaker 10: of a puppet regime of US and Israel, But I
Speaker 10: really do think it was more just like the facts
Speaker 10: on the ground, they're probably just like, yeah, I don't
Speaker 10: really we just kind of came in power. I don't
Speaker 10: really want to be seen as working with Israel to
Speaker 10: house de Hezbela.
Speaker 11: It's probably not the greatest move right now.
Speaker 10: And then shortly after that, you know, which you'd think
Speaker 10: that'd be a respectable decision, Okay, whatever, fair enough, you
Speaker 10: won't get involved in our war. But that's not how
Speaker 10: it works. Israel, they've been attacking Syria. Now, they haven't
Speaker 10: said that the actually they have said the reasoning they're
Speaker 10: blaming on some shit from like weeks or from like
Speaker 10: months ago.
Speaker 11: I think the whole weird minority.
Speaker 10: I don't know if you were paying attention to this stuff,
Speaker 10: that the Drews stuff that was going on in Syria
Speaker 10: a while ago.
Speaker 11: So they're blaming on this weird minority.
Speaker 10: Which, don't get me wrong, that's fair enough, but I
Speaker 10: mean not fair enough in the sense of what they're
Speaker 10: doing as a result of it. But they do have
Speaker 10: a gripe in the some of the minority violence that
Speaker 10: was going on there, some of the I mean there
Speaker 10: was weird ethnic groups butting up against each other, particularly
Speaker 10: even some of the HTS people, which I guess there's
Speaker 10: a lot of Isis mixed in there because they've kind
Speaker 10: of just picked up mercenaries. But anyways, uh, yeah, things
Speaker 10: have gone out of hands and now they're attacked. They're
Speaker 10: they're they're attacking uh Syria, they're attacking the series, which
Speaker 10: that they don't care. I mean, whether they're puppets or
Speaker 10: whether they're a further destabilized region, it doesn't matter to them.
Speaker 10: So but yeah, we have Lebanon. They've they initially said
Speaker 10: this is the game they play every time they go, oh,
Speaker 10: we need a buffer zone. So they take over this
Speaker 10: buffer zone. And now they've kicked people out of like
Speaker 10: anywhere south of the Litany River, I believe. Uh they said,
Speaker 10: you got to evacuate. Uh, and then we'll let people
Speaker 10: back once we feel safe. Of course they never feel safe.
Speaker 10: And then now they're bombing bridges and you have.
Speaker 11: I don't know it's Bazaill. I want to say it
Speaker 11: was Cats.
Speaker 10: I think it was Israel Cats that one of those
Speaker 10: three main ministers or or or whatever that was proudly
Speaker 10: proclaiming that they should annex it.
Speaker 11: So they're calling for annexation.
Speaker 10: Uh so they kind of signal everything as they go on,
Speaker 10: so you'll what will happen is you'll have one of
Speaker 10: the ministers, one of one of the members of the cabinet,
Speaker 10: you know, calling you know, overtly for things like uh,
Speaker 10: displacement of the people, flat out genocide.
Speaker 11: Uh, just you know, things like war crimes.
Speaker 10: And then what will happen is when you know anyone
Speaker 10: of like that's not them, that after like, ah, well, well,
Speaker 10: well you know that would be against the rules, And
Speaker 10: the next thing you know, they're doing it exactly.
Speaker 2: And that's I mean, who did just as much as
Speaker 2: far as I think what did he He claimed that
Speaker 2: Iran was was basically just unrepentantly striking these these civilian
Speaker 2: sites and targets, and and basically, uh, really accusing Iran
Speaker 2: and the regime of being guilty of what the Israeli
Speaker 2: regime currently is guilty of. And you see, as far
Speaker 2: as the Lebanon conflicts that you would reference, I saw
Speaker 2: a recent report from Jason ditz right and it was
Speaker 2: rand at anti war dot com as well, and it
Speaker 2: basically addresses the humanitarian crisis increasingly becoming disastrous as war
Speaker 2: continues to escalate. Lebanon death toll passes one thousand according
Speaker 2: to Amnesty International. Allegedly they made a well, not allegedly,
Speaker 2: they made a public statement and published a report claiming
Speaker 2: and saying Israel needs and must stop attacking hospitals basically,
Speaker 2: and the claim was since Israel started its new war
Speaker 2: against Lebanon at the beginning of the month, over a
Speaker 2: thousand people have been killed. The formal numbers from the
Speaker 2: Lebanese Health Ministry say that it includes seventy nine women,
Speaker 2: one hundred and eighteen children, and at least forty healthcare workers.
Speaker 2: So and this is the cost of war. This is
Speaker 2: something that stands the test of time, and in no
Speaker 2: way should you find yourself on the end of a
Speaker 2: facilitating a conflict such as this and ever justifying it
Speaker 2: in any real way, especially in ethical terms. I mean,
Speaker 2: you need to have a come to Jesus moment and
Speaker 2: reflect on who you've become and allowed yourself to become,
Speaker 2: because you should see for yourself firsthand what the cost
Speaker 2: of war truly is. Witness the civilian casualties, and then
Speaker 2: come back with a legitimate argument and face yourself in
Speaker 2: the mirror. But I'll hold I won't hold my breath,
Speaker 2: and as far as that's concerned, and I don't think
Speaker 2: any of us should. But hey, I will say thank
Speaker 2: God for the amount of people that are waking up
Speaker 2: in this moment and that are seeing, you know, the
Speaker 2: light in terms of in this moment of darkness, they're
Speaker 2: gravitating towards the light and they're finding out the unfortunate
Speaker 2: reality we face that threat. It's become vital for us
Speaker 2: to acknowledge it and address it for what it is.
Speaker 2: But in honest terms, you know, it's something that we
Speaker 2: can't have this Hollywood version of again, the cartoonish phase
Speaker 2: of reality. We can't have that. We can't allow it
Speaker 2: to blur our vision right when when it matters most
Speaker 2: and what's on the line in this moment, I mean,
Speaker 2: this is the future of all mankind, you know, honestly
Speaker 2: it is. As much as that's the most dramatic terminology
Speaker 2: I could use, it feels that way. You know, we're
Speaker 2: at an ethical crossroads. You have you have to again
Speaker 2: come to come to terms with with the threats truly
Speaker 2: being posed to society at large. And until that moment comes,
Speaker 2: good luck. Right, That's that's all I have to say.
Speaker 2: So I feel sorry for you, you know, I wish
Speaker 2: you would have done a little more work on your
Speaker 2: end before this moment came. But it's not it's not
Speaker 2: our place, it's not our role. We can be here
Speaker 2: for the moment in which they become open minded and
Speaker 2: objective enough to it to you know, consider these these
Speaker 2: alternative you know views, But man, we can't do the
Speaker 2: work for them. We can't bridge that gap on their behalf.
Speaker 2: It's it's something that you have to genuinely, you know,
Speaker 2: kind of follow that path on your own. And and
Speaker 2: you know, I'm holding out hope. Obviously, this is no
Speaker 2: in no way a black pill. I just see, you know,
Speaker 2: the daily the daily consequences of what is happening on
Speaker 2: our taxpayer dollars. That's what what really rocks me to
Speaker 2: my core, you know, is is that I effectively am
Speaker 2: am complicit right all of us. And that's a real
Speaker 2: problem for me as someone who wants to opt out desperately,
Speaker 2: I mean, and my god, morally it's hard to cope with, right.
Speaker 2: But anyway, I'll stop off my soapbox in terms.
Speaker 10: Of that, well, thankfully, Austin though, I mean, during these
Speaker 10: dour times, you know, we're given heroes to rally the
Speaker 10: people we've got. I mean, hell, you'd almost think he
Speaker 10: was like a comic book character with a name like Kent.
Speaker 10: We had we had Joe Kent to enter this scene
Speaker 10: reminding us, as everyone's out here heard during Iran Bad
Speaker 10: that perhaps you need to find deep down in your
Speaker 10: heart that also and not even also like the priority
Speaker 10: like you can't be having.
Speaker 11: It's it's hard to have heard her Iran in your heart.
Speaker 10: Well, when you when you have a herder China Bad
Speaker 10: in your heart, there are two things that can't really sustain,
Speaker 10: you know, enter into the equation. At the same time.
Speaker 10: I mean just how I mean we're simple people. I
Speaker 10: mean you got have a very simple practice. If you're
Speaker 10: trying to say, hey, Herder bad and you need to
Speaker 10: have Herder one major thing bad, you can't have to.
Speaker 11: Uh So, I mean it.
Speaker 10: Looks I mean, I ga because I'd be a little
Speaker 10: bit silly, be a little bit facetious here.
Speaker 11: But I did watch the Uh I had to check
Speaker 11: it out.
Speaker 10: I mean I had my thoughts I and let's be
Speaker 10: I was completely one hundred percent correct. The first twenty
Speaker 10: minutes of the Tucker Carlson interview is literally, uh, well,
Speaker 10: you know, I just right now we need to really
Speaker 10: be focusing on Herder China bad. And we got all
Speaker 10: this Herder Iran bad going on, so you know, we
Speaker 10: got to get back on. So there's nothing about this
Speaker 10: is really all that principle there really is we need
Speaker 10: to be focusing on the big on the next fight,
Speaker 10: this vague thing. It's funny too, they even give this
Speaker 10: like sort of uh they do this thing where like, well,
Speaker 10: China's winning because you know they're they're not.
Speaker 11: They're engaging, like they're the deal makers, like they're the.
Speaker 10: Ones who get to be there be the rational and
Speaker 10: you know, it's let's be real, like the angling here
Speaker 10: is they're angling for some sort of economic warfare, some
Speaker 10: sort of light level warfare, maybe even more in the future.
Speaker 10: They're they're just playing these weird great power games, and
Speaker 10: they're focused on China as opposed to like breaking the
Speaker 10: paradigm and just not being like, just don't be shitty
Speaker 10: this whole like, oh, we're got we gotta be angling
Speaker 10: to fight China. I personally find it particularly ridiculous, but
Speaker 10: I don't know, I just kind of want to I
Speaker 10: guess get.
Speaker 11: Your thoughts on that. I guess a little bit.
Speaker 10: Obviously you're here the same perspective idea, But I just
Speaker 10: I found it hilarious.
Speaker 11: Literally, like the first twenty minutes really are just that.
Speaker 10: Which you know, to be fair, I mean, this is
Speaker 10: I guess, if I'm gonna make I'm kind of implying
Speaker 10: perhaps is a limited hangout of some sort, Like I
Speaker 10: think this is a W. Like to be very clear,
Speaker 10: I think this is a W. But I just I
Speaker 10: also I guess maybe a little bit of the stick
Speaker 10: in the mud. Everybody wants to have this fun oh
Speaker 10: my god, the hero moment, and perhaps I'm not I mean,
Speaker 10: obviously I don't know exactly, but I think it was
Speaker 10: probably a little bit more of a analytical situation if
Speaker 10: I had to, and I and let's be really, he
Speaker 10: probably actually believes these things, perhaps like he probably some
Speaker 10: degree believes it.
Speaker 2: He definitely knows its popular opinion at this moment. And
Speaker 2: I think as far as public perception is concerned, now
Speaker 2: that's the way I look at some of these personalities,
Speaker 2: especially the Tuckers of the world and Candaeans, And I
Speaker 2: mean not as much of Mike Flynn in the influencer context,
Speaker 2: because clearly he has such an interesting military background, but
Speaker 2: still he's being utilized in that way. These are controlled
Speaker 2: opposition assets in my opinion, that they land on separate
Speaker 2: sides of the political spectrum that is being exploited and
Speaker 2: leveraged against us and the individuals who still engage in
Speaker 2: it in this way, and I think they lend each
Speaker 2: other credibility through the influencer wars that they engage in,
Speaker 2: right these public because the point being is you realize
Speaker 2: the opportunity if you're the permanent establishment that they in
Speaker 2: quotations right that that we all refer to so often,
Speaker 2: and you want to control the outcome. Why would you
Speaker 2: not litter the avenues of opportunity at all times to
Speaker 2: essentially lend credibility to certain controlled opposition assets in these
Speaker 2: fields of influence. What do we refer to it as
Speaker 2: the influencer industrial complex for a reason, And that's that's
Speaker 2: what I view this specifically kind of falling into or
Speaker 2: under that umbrella, because instantly, what I just saw happen
Speaker 2: is uh because again, this is kind of how you
Speaker 2: you rain in the individuals who are fleeing from the propaganda.
Speaker 2: You can kind of control the outcome and rain them
Speaker 2: back into the establishment narrative by by providing them the
Speaker 2: hero right in the moment of crisis. And that's exactly
Speaker 2: what I think. It's a moral crisis that they're exploiting.
Speaker 2: And so you see Cash Betel's prager, you affiliated girlfriend
Speaker 2: who couldn't be more of a Masad asset coming out
Speaker 2: and claiming that what her name's Alexis Wilkins, right, that's
Speaker 2: her name. She alleges that Mike Flynn, Tucker Carlson, Joe Kent,
Speaker 2: and Candace Owens are all linked to a foreign influence operation.
Speaker 2: She also claims she is the victim of a foreign
Speaker 2: linked influenced network that has coordinated operations against her and
Speaker 2: insinuates it is not Israel, and that.
Speaker 10: Was obviously it's a thirteen tweet thread, by the way,
Speaker 10: which I don't understand why. For one, she has a
Speaker 10: blue check, so I don't understand why she did it
Speaker 10: in that way because you can just make it one
Speaker 10: big threat. But whatever that aside, it's just me being
Speaker 10: weirdly nerdy about it. But yeah, she did a thirteen
Speaker 10: tweet thread on it for some fucking reason. So I
Speaker 10: haven't bookmarked. I'll probably cover it for the morning show
Speaker 10: tomorrow because.
Speaker 11: How do I not.
Speaker 10: But yeah, I'm not going to bore you guys with
Speaker 10: digging onto all that right now. But yeah, she looks
Speaker 10: like she's making a pretty cool and to be fair,
Speaker 10: some of the people she's implying are some sort of
Speaker 10: contrived op of some sort. She's I think correct, but
Speaker 10: it's like, I actually just but right before we started,
Speaker 10: I did the I quote tweeted it with the tried.
Speaker 11: And trough you know Spider Man meme where they're pointing
Speaker 11: at each other.
Speaker 10: But it's like, yeah, I think she's correct, but it's
Speaker 10: like also like the pot calling the kettle Blacks exactly.
Speaker 2: And I think that's exactly what the point is in
Speaker 2: terms of you know what.
Speaker 11: The calling Chabad massade especially, but sorry, go on, what
Speaker 11: is the.
Speaker 2: I mean, the number one tool of a of a
Speaker 2: controlled asset or a controlled opposition asset is a limited hangout, right,
Speaker 2: And so essentially all you have to do is put
Speaker 2: yourself against the other controlled asset on the opposite side
Speaker 2: of the political spectrum, who represents right the opposing narrative,
Speaker 2: and you win on both sides in terms of just
Speaker 2: again consolidating the influence of the groups of people. This
Speaker 2: will obviously affect and I think impact and just as
Speaker 2: far as their their opinions in this context. And so
Speaker 2: I see josh Hammer, right, we were talking about it privately,
Speaker 2: and he basically comes out on the war path against
Speaker 2: Joe Kent, specifically saying he should be immediately arrested and
Speaker 2: that he was leaking information. But obviously Josh Hammer provides
Speaker 2: no evidence of this, but he claims that he even
Speaker 2: put it in context, saying that should have been trying
Speaker 2: to find Antifa, black Lives Matter in the Muslim brotherhood,
Speaker 2: but not Israel. And then he goes on to accuse
Speaker 2: Tulsi Gabbert right of running a shadow operation that he
Speaker 2: views as anti Semitic. And these are anonymous sources, of
Speaker 2: course that provided him this information, but he says Tulsi
Speaker 2: Gabbert is directly involved in an anti Semitic influencer operation Boom.
Speaker 2: The language that they use hangs them by their own
Speaker 2: petard in a way, right, Like, honestly, it's something that
Speaker 2: I think more people should pay attention to. Pattern recognition matters,
Speaker 2: understanding the language for what it is. I'm sorry.
Speaker 10: But and also to the controlled op, it almost looks
Speaker 10: like they're re establishing their controlled op or they're trying
Speaker 10: to as well. They're like rebuilding it back up because
Speaker 10: like trying to sell Talsy as some sort of sho
Speaker 10: like okay, all right, sure, yeah, the one is coucked
Speaker 10: out completely and all the report, all the rumors behind
Speaker 10: the scenes is just no influence whatso fucking have her,
Speaker 10: But yeah, she's running a fucking shadow up, which but
Speaker 10: like to them, you know, she's effective for having this
Speaker 10: having this view as like being the principled one. So
Speaker 10: if you are eleven of the world selling this cope
Speaker 10: is like, oh, she's doing that that kind of keeps
Speaker 10: some of the Pannikins on board. Incidentally, So I mean
Speaker 10: not saying he's this intelligent. He seems pretty stupid, but
Speaker 10: who knows. I mean either way, it effectively works for.
Speaker 2: That exactly, and it rehabs her image in a real way,
Speaker 2: and honestly, as far as people who are more low
Speaker 2: frequency and just as far as their interpretation is concerned,
Speaker 2: and just the overall news cycle, yeah it will. It
Speaker 2: will impact them in a real way and probably affect
Speaker 2: them in their opinions and in a negative context as
Speaker 2: far as the systematic agendas. So that's that's the main
Speaker 2: issue I have. These people want to have no more
Speaker 2: heroes is the sentiment I think as much as I
Speaker 2: think that was once upon a time in the Malifarina's
Speaker 2: name of his podcast. I think he changed the name,
Speaker 2: but it used to be no more Heroes. And I
Speaker 2: always found that to be just very poignant in our
Speaker 2: current phase of reality, because they want you to be
Speaker 2: in that vulnerable position where you are psychologically waiting at
Speaker 2: all times primed and ready for for another hero to
Speaker 2: land on the political spectrum, for you to you know,
Speaker 2: set on their pedestal and and defend with and justify
Speaker 2: their actions without any sort of uh you know, moral
Speaker 2: clarity and principle. Uh yeah, just foundation and and uh
Speaker 2: and the cycle repeats.
Speaker 10: So but yeah, I mean Joe Ken, he's beyond reproach.
Speaker 10: I mean, do you see the heroic thing he pulled here?
Speaker 16: Uh?
Speaker 11: Leaving it? I mean, don't you know he's prior military?
Speaker 17: Uh?
Speaker 10: I mean his wife died in uh you know his
Speaker 10: wife does? I mean you can never hear them saying that, like, yeah,
Speaker 10: isis kill ther which it's like, to be fair, like
Speaker 10: people always say that. It's like, I have no idea
Speaker 10: the context this motherfucker was, Like, I don't know if
Speaker 10: this happened when he was CIA or when he was
Speaker 10: or when he was a Green Beret, but either either way,
Speaker 10: I mean, I mean, we don't know what shadow games
Speaker 10: are going I mean, especially if you know the conspiracy
Speaker 10: surrounding isis Like, I don't know like what it particularly
Speaker 10: is going on here. But this this seems like uh,
Speaker 10: some Tealite like the CIA or teals CIA versus like
Speaker 10: Chipod's facade, which to some degree I think there is
Speaker 10: truth in these in a little bit of this narrative
Speaker 10: battle occurring but it's like some degree sanitized and that
Speaker 10: it's like, but it's also like a little bit of
Speaker 10: this like as above so below a little bit of
Speaker 10: like you know, fake binaries coming at play, while there
Speaker 10: also is some truth to the binary, like for example,
Speaker 10: like to this idea of I've gone to with Like,
Speaker 10: I do think there is a genuine foreign policy schism
Speaker 10: with these these parties here. I think one of them
Speaker 10: wants to not get mired in the Middle East and
Speaker 10: wants to focus on the next big great power coming
Speaker 10: up China. I think that's like generally speaking, you're you're
Speaker 10: vaguely CIA guys, your you know, the Teals, the the Tucker,
Speaker 10: the kids.
Speaker 2: You're saying yeah, yeah, and then yeah and.
Speaker 10: Then and then you have on the flip side, you
Speaker 10: got like the Chabad, the Masade whatever, the Levins, the
Speaker 10: the Grams that uh that that's they're all in on
Speaker 10: on the Middle East. Like that's that's what they wanted
Speaker 10: to get done. So I do think in like, obviously
Speaker 10: in a certain sense, I prefer the CIA guys here,
Speaker 10: but I'm still gonna point out their CIA because at
Speaker 10: least it is like a delaying the shitty thing to later,
Speaker 10: like they want to.
Speaker 11: Do some shitty China stuff later.
Speaker 10: Uh so, but I'm but whatever, I'm just aware there's
Speaker 10: gonna be shitty China stuff in the future. I don't
Speaker 10: have to give my full throated endorsement of these guys
Speaker 10: to say that, like, hey, they're right on this, But
Speaker 10: this is like every people are not able. Are incapable
Speaker 10: of walking and chewing gum? It seems like they're incapable
Speaker 10: of being like, Yeah, that's cool, that's cool that Ken,
Speaker 10: what Ken's doing, you know how that's shaking out for
Speaker 10: current things. That doesn't necessarily mean he's some crazy hero
Speaker 10: and like and we don't necessarily need to give him
Speaker 10: any sort of crazy you know, because let's be really
Speaker 10: gonna run for something in the future, he's gonna do something.
Speaker 10: They're gonna they're going to launder his reputation for something.
Speaker 10: Uh you know, So like it's it's not like he's
Speaker 10: a non entity. There's not like a This is like
Speaker 10: the same idea when people are like, oh my god,
Speaker 10: Elon Musk is bringing back free speech. You didn't have
Speaker 10: to do this, you know, he's really helping us all here.
Speaker 10: Like it's like, are you really incapable of understanding how
Speaker 10: this in any way benefits it. You know, this like
Speaker 10: huge billionaire guy that has like why control of many markets,
Speaker 10: like how it would make sense for him to take
Speaker 10: over a social media app.
Speaker 11: I know, it's not that crazy.
Speaker 10: I mean, has it really that crazy for a political
Speaker 10: individual that you know, made a point for him to
Speaker 10: being like a somewhat sort of vaguely against the terror
Speaker 10: wars or whatever because he experienced it, that's part of
Speaker 10: his story. Isn't really that crazy to think for a
Speaker 10: political figure that has legs for decades to come that
Speaker 10: perhaps they would go, oh, I don't want to make
Speaker 10: myself no longer a viable political candidate going forward. Isn't
Speaker 10: really that crazy, especially in a situation where it's like,
Speaker 10: I don't know, if you read the tea leaves, it's
Speaker 10: like this is definitely a w for the future. And yeah,
Speaker 10: and a lot of you were saying like he could
Speaker 10: end up dealing with some negative consequences from the establishment,
Speaker 10: and I actually think he probably will. I wouldn't be
Speaker 10: at least bit surprised because I think he's already been
Speaker 10: reports that he's being indicted or something. I don't know
Speaker 10: what's gonna come in that I wouldn't be this bit
Speaker 10: surprised if he does get dragged through some sort of
Speaker 10: court something or other. We're gonna keep this monitor going
Speaker 10: of what a hero, look at what he's going through
Speaker 10: for the nation. And I think it'll probably quietly when
Speaker 10: people aren't really paying attention to kind of just blow
Speaker 10: over into nothing charge to drop, which.
Speaker 2: There will only help to further Bolster's reputation, which is
Speaker 2: the ultimate goal in the first place. And that's I mean,
Speaker 2: you tie that in with that Axios article that we
Speaker 2: covered last week that what was the headline anti war,
Speaker 2: anti semitism is still anti semitism, and it was specifically
Speaker 2: in context regarding Joe Kent, and it was it was
Speaker 2: cautioning the Democrats to distance themselves and stay away from
Speaker 2: Joe Kent as a political operative, as an asset of
Speaker 2: some kind that they could use going forward. And I
Speaker 2: thought very strange thing to do, just as far as
Speaker 2: the mainstream publication to publish an article that seemed to
Speaker 2: be very political in nature and addressing specifically the establishment
Speaker 2: politicians and puppets that exist and as public representatives. But anyway,
Speaker 2: found it interesting, right.
Speaker 10: Jacob, you got something for us, have you got a call.
Speaker 10: We haven't even opened the phone lines yet. I don't
Speaker 10: know what's totally it up?
Speaker 14: But can you hear me?
Speaker 11: I can hear you?
Speaker 14: What's up?
Speaker 2: That's so funny.
Speaker 8: My entire system is not very happy because I had
Speaker 8: to too many things. So I'm actually on my phone
Speaker 8: right now.
Speaker 2: Loading the post mortem.
Speaker 10: So okay, So so is it we do not have
Speaker 10: a post mortem right now? Is that we were telling
Speaker 10: us I can play the way?
Speaker 8: If I don't play this post mortem after everything I've
Speaker 8: just been through background, I might just pull my hair out.
Speaker 10: Okay, Well, I'm gonna take a moment to address one
Speaker 10: more thing in a check because someone did ask a
Speaker 10: question for AU.
Speaker 11: We'll ask it.
Speaker 10: We'll answer it pretty slowly to give you the chance
Speaker 10: to set something up. So well, I don't know if
Speaker 10: you can set up the next couple of minutes, but
Speaker 10: I do have where is the uh? I saw this
Speaker 10: earlier and I thought we'd address it. This must be
Speaker 10: a newer persons show, someone asking how's one contact you
Speaker 10: guys at work right now?
Speaker 11: So I can't, but I am interested, and now there
Speaker 11: is a range of options. This is a call in show.
Speaker 10: Typically we try to get the phone lines going in
Speaker 10: the first half, but as you heard, our producer was
Speaker 10: dealing with some issues, I guess, so maybe we'll have
Speaker 10: phones open the second half.
Speaker 11: Now, that is the non paying option. You can call
Speaker 11: in every episode.
Speaker 1: We do.
Speaker 10: Like I said, we try to get them up and
Speaker 10: running as soon as possible, pretty early on, so you
Speaker 10: can call in. Obviously, you can be limited audio and
Speaker 10: it's gonna be a phone line. So it's a little
Speaker 10: bit nostalgic, but it's a little bit harder to hear.
Speaker 10: But now, if you're a patron of me or Austin,
Speaker 10: you don't have to pay for us both, but you
Speaker 10: should if you support either me or Austin.
Speaker 11: We do every week.
Speaker 10: We drop we drop links to make it as if
Speaker 10: it just as if you were like a guest like
Speaker 10: me or Austin are right now, you can be a
Speaker 10: talking head on the screen.
Speaker 11: You can come up for the second half of the show.
Speaker 10: We save the second half of the show as we're
Speaker 10: getting ready to go into I'm kind of going slow
Speaker 10: right now to give Jacob time to set up the intermission.
Speaker 10: But after intermission we usually bring on patrons to come
Speaker 10: on and you know, I know, ask questions field calls
Speaker 10: shoot the shit, you know that sort of thing. So now,
Speaker 10: if you want to try to contact us, like personally,
Speaker 10: I'm on Twitter at tigging Jose. My email the Liberty
Speaker 10: Movement Global at gmail dot com. I know it's an
Speaker 10: awfully email. It's from an old project. I just didn't
Speaker 10: care to change it. Uh So that's how you can
Speaker 10: contact us. I mean, if you're trying to be part
Speaker 10: of the show though, like I said, you can do
Speaker 10: the calling option for non paying, or you can hop
Speaker 10: on a video call, you know, just like me and
Speaker 10: Austin are right now, And.
Speaker 11: That's for me. That's two bucks a month.
Speaker 10: I think for Austin, I think your lowest levels like three,
Speaker 10: I mean, pretty pretty low. Either way, you also get
Speaker 10: the addition the uh the added exclusive Paywald show with
Speaker 10: Brad Binkley, Austin and Sam Tripoli. So if you uh so,
Speaker 10: you get a little bit, you get a extra oom
Speaker 10: for that extra dollar. So I do not have a
Speaker 10: perk like that, so uh so that's what you get
Speaker 10: for that extra dollar, but five dollars to make you holler.
Speaker 10: Uh so you can you just pay both of us,
Speaker 10: and like I said, you don't have to pay both
Speaker 10: of us, but you can hop on as we're gonna
Speaker 10: ready to bring on some people here in a moment, probably.
Speaker 11: Shoot the bull.
Speaker 10: Uh, But yeah, that's how you get a hold of
Speaker 10: this at Austin. We're gonna, We're gonna get a hold
Speaker 10: of you, I guess from the show.
Speaker 2: Well, definitely follow me on Twitter at theater thug awp
Speaker 2: spelled theater at th h E A t r E
Speaker 2: and uh. And then also obviously subscribe to the Underclass
Speaker 2: podcast on YouTube, Rumble and Patreon. Uh if you can
Speaker 2: afford it. Obviously on Patreon would be ideal. But yeah,
Speaker 2: I think I'm definitely working through my next solo project,
Speaker 2: so that'll be very interesting. But William sent me on
Speaker 2: a tangent just remembering all of the the dark and
Speaker 2: disgusting and disturbing details that were involved in the Hosanna
Speaker 2: Church scandal case because he had tweeted me about it
Speaker 2: and and basically encouraged me to finally compose a tweet
Speaker 2: just in regard to that case specifically because it always
Speaker 2: did it haunts me to this day obviously, and then
Speaker 2: just knowing the details of it is something that I
Speaker 2: think is pressing and far too many people are unaware
Speaker 2: of that case just in general, and and I find
Speaker 2: that to be interesting. But what is at least relevant
Speaker 2: to the show is Project Esther, which we talked about privately, right,
Speaker 2: which was essentially, uh, you know, it's it's this anti
Speaker 2: Semitism task force and and the uh, the systematic entrenchment
Speaker 2: of this, just as far as utilizing anti Semitism as
Speaker 2: a justification becoming it's really coming full circle and revealing
Speaker 2: itself in the US and domestic policy in a real way.
Speaker 2: And and uh, and that kind of reveals itself in
Speaker 2: this latest example of a Michigan sheriff by the name
Speaker 2: of Mike Bouchard, who basically ordered the arrest of what
Speaker 2: he referred to as an anti Semitic American UH, for
Speaker 2: trying to threaten and at imitate him by posting a meme.
Speaker 2: Is how it's kind of went viral. Now there's additional context,
Speaker 2: and you know, I think obviously the details matter in
Speaker 2: this in this case, but still, this is the slippery
Speaker 2: slope of the dystopian pretext which we reference so very often.
Speaker 2: And that's the major point I'm attempting to make. And
Speaker 2: when you see, honestly, the clip is so funny because
Speaker 2: the alleged meme that upset this sheriff is it's a
Speaker 2: jew meme basically, right, But again you have he's claiming
Speaker 2: that the First Amendment makes people quote feel empowered, emboldened,
Speaker 2: and safe. So basically the point he's making is he
Speaker 2: needed to teach the public a lesson by using this
Speaker 2: as a precedent, and that alone is is worthwhile and mentioning.
Speaker 2: And I'll get into the details after we watched this
Speaker 2: brief clip if you're cool with that before we go
Speaker 2: to intermission. Yeah, I just think it's so fun honestly,
Speaker 2: as uh as dystopian as it is.
Speaker 4: I give you this by way of example, some ponds
Speaker 4: get so good empowered and embolden enough to put this
Speaker 4: picture of me up to try to threaten and intimidate me, which,
Speaker 4: of course.
Speaker 2: You because I signed up for this poor sheriff.
Speaker 5: And by the way, the person that did this said
Speaker 5: a bunch of terrible things, not just against me, but
Speaker 5: against a lot of UH groups and individuals, who, by
Speaker 5: the way, was arrested today in Wisconsin. My point is this, though,
Speaker 5: if this person is embolden and empowered enough or feel
Speaker 5: safe enough to do this, for me, what does he
Speaker 5: do to a kid a Jewish family walking.
Speaker 2: Down that alone? Right, Like, what are you doing here?
Speaker 11: You know he looked like a Jew. I bet you
Speaker 11: he folks kids.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, But to bring it up in that context as
Speaker 2: far as you know, using this this ridiculous, you know,
Speaker 2: just example and and obviously flawed in my opinion, it's
Speaker 2: it's hilarious and and disgusting and grotesque honestly as far
Speaker 2: as morally speaking.
Speaker 6: But anyway on the street, and that's because of the
Speaker 6: normalization of this, watching this on television and saying Okay,
Speaker 6: I feel empowered enough that I can do this, Well, hey,
Speaker 6: you can't.
Speaker 5: And b if you think you can do it to
Speaker 5: somebody that's in law enforcement, again, what are you going
Speaker 5: to do in a in an alley or in a
Speaker 5: street to a Jewish family or a kid walking down
Speaker 5: the street. Ah, we say no, we're drawing the line.
Speaker 2: Okay, obviously a false equivalency in my opinion in terms
Speaker 2: of that example that he's trying to equate it with,
Speaker 2: which that again, I see this and I'll explain the
Speaker 2: details briefly in just a moment, but I thought, right
Speaker 2: after I witnessed this, just overt display of utilizing this
Speaker 2: justification which we harp on every week. I see a
Speaker 2: report from the CBC, which I know is a rag
Speaker 2: and very much propaganda would have done a few different
Speaker 2: interesting reports that I do find valuable for my own right.
Speaker 2: And I saw this strange report of Canadian Jews faking
Speaker 2: anti Semitic attacks, right, and it says a Jewish family
Speaker 2: staged four fake hate crimes on their restaurant. They were
Speaker 2: charged by police, waited until the court date was set,
Speaker 2: and then fled straight to Israel and disappeared. So obviously
Speaker 2: they never faced justice or any sort of accountability for
Speaker 2: their actions whatsoever, which seems to be the prevailing kind
Speaker 2: of out And as far as the vast majority of
Speaker 2: some of these these Jewish Americans, uh, and I guess
Speaker 2: Canadian Americans, I would imagine this applies internationally, right, as
Speaker 2: far as the ability and avenue that's open and available
Speaker 2: to any sort of uh a Jewish citizen who would
Speaker 2: need to seek some sort of refuge from from any
Speaker 2: kind of criminal pursuit or action uh following them, Uh,
Speaker 2: they can just kind of hide out in Israel. And
Speaker 2: and that being available and to them is just in itself. Yeah,
Speaker 2: just people should be aware of the fact that apparently
Speaker 2: this this does apply, and that there is an avenue
Speaker 2: to escape accountability and justice, and and that is that
Speaker 2: is a real problem and and in no way anything new, right,
Speaker 2: But this Michigan sheriff he reported receiving a threatening edited
Speaker 2: photo which we saw that included anti Semitic symbols it's
Speaker 2: the Star of David, leading to the arrest of a suspect.
Speaker 2: The sheriff emphasized the growing normalization of anti Semitism and
Speaker 2: the need for community action against such behavior. And again
Speaker 2: it's something that I found interesting because Bouchard reported a
Speaker 2: significant rise in anti Semitic incidents, and he specifically noted
Speaker 2: a three hundred and forty four percent increase in targeted
Speaker 2: reported incidents against Jewish individuals and communities between twenty twenty
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty four, and then claims this alarming trend
Speaker 2: underscores the urgency of addressing anti semitism in society, and
Speaker 2: so they want to become vigilant in supporting Jewish communities
Speaker 2: and action to combat hate and intimidation. And yeah, so
Speaker 2: again it's like, if you look into this a little
Speaker 2: bit and scratch the surface. It's not so simple. It's
Speaker 2: not as black and white. And unfortunately, this individual who
Speaker 2: was arrested in Wisconsin, definitely it's not someone to in
Speaker 2: any way put on a platform, or not platform, but
Speaker 2: put on a pedestal. Morally speaking, he's not someone that
Speaker 2: you would want to align with in my opinion, looking
Speaker 2: through the details. Just because you might agree on certain
Speaker 2: sentiments regarding their political views doesn't necessarily mean that that
Speaker 2: they are morally centered, right, And as far as the
Speaker 2: Oakland County Sheriff's office, they felt the need to kind of,
Speaker 2: I don't know, almost almost kind of. It's it's really
Speaker 2: strange the way in which they decided to make this
Speaker 2: public statement, because it feels like they're kind of provoking
Speaker 2: the public. It's it's weird, right, you would think in
Speaker 2: a police department wouldn't, well, not from the context and
Speaker 2: the examples that we have we have focused on, which
Speaker 2: obviously proved that they would rather escalate than de escalate
Speaker 2: more often than not. But they report on this trying
Speaker 2: to push back on the alleged anti Semitic American arrest.
Speaker 2: So the Oakland County Sheriff's Office tweeted for people that
Speaker 2: are whining that someone was arrested for posting a meme
Speaker 2: sorry to disappoint, not even for threatening racist and anti
Speaker 2: Semitic comments. He had a prior outstanding felony stalking warrant
Speaker 2: on something completely unrelated, which drew local police attention to
Speaker 2: him when someone complained in Wisconsin. Basically, and so I
Speaker 2: looked in just a little bit further, and I'll finish
Speaker 2: with this point, and that's just basically that he was
Speaker 2: essentially posting anti Semitic death threats against state officials on
Speaker 2: Twitter is what they're complaining about. And he's doing court
Speaker 2: Michigan man after allegedly being responsible for this, and the
Speaker 2: Detroit News first reported the case on and basically, the
Speaker 2: FBI arrested James Eugene Carpenter the third and this was
Speaker 2: last month, citing a specific threat to kill quote anyone
Speaker 2: that is Jewish in the Michigan government, including the state
Speaker 2: attorney general. So apparently he went a little bit further
Speaker 2: than Yeah, I don't know, I personally would would appreciate,
Speaker 2: but so the agency said. The message was posted February seventeenth,
Speaker 2: while Carpenter was convicted in Texas his charge with making
Speaker 2: threatening interstate communications. If convicted, he could face up to
Speaker 2: five years in prison. So we have apparently he has
Speaker 2: additional arrest warrants due to the stalking charge and things
Speaker 2: of that nature. So he's not quite the stand up
Speaker 2: individual that some of these viral posts are are clearly
Speaker 2: missing the point because it's convenient, right, And that's what
Speaker 2: I find to be problematic, is that we have to
Speaker 2: be objective. It doesn't. You can't just have things neatly
Speaker 2: confirm your bias at every at every you know, turn,
Speaker 2: just as far as the the news cycle is concerned,
Speaker 2: and and and so that's that's something that I would
Speaker 2: just try and you know, caution anyone to to try
Speaker 2: and uphold that standard for themselves because it's easy to
Speaker 2: fall into that trap, you know. And and we have
Speaker 2: to rise above that ideological paradigm and and the ideological
Speaker 2: prison and and subversion that Yuri Besmanov warned us of. Uh,
Speaker 2: it's real and the effect is happening in real time.
Speaker 10: So anyway, right by the way, uh, Jacob was trying
Speaker 10: to pop in, he was just gonna tell us, uh
Speaker 10: that I guess he's he's still having issues. So I
Speaker 10: think we're just gonna go with no intermission today. Uh
Speaker 10: So the rare sticklers of you guys who don't like
Speaker 10: scream on music and complain about in the chat, you
Speaker 10: will not be exposed to that to this week. Next
Speaker 10: week you will. So there is one more little topic
Speaker 10: I did want to talk to you about. And then
Speaker 10: I figured maybe we bring in one of our patrons
Speaker 10: and then roll out of here, maybe do another twenty
Speaker 10: thirty months or so and get out.
Speaker 3: But we.
Speaker 11: Told a weird brain fart.
Speaker 7: Oh.
Speaker 10: The other thing I wanted to talk to you about
Speaker 10: we mentioned before the rothschild raid. So yeah, there apparently
Speaker 10: I did not know anything about this. There was a
Speaker 10: wroth child raid.
Speaker 11: But yeah, I figure we shoot the bull about that
Speaker 11: a little bit.
Speaker 10: And I think a raged child wants to join us,
Speaker 10: So maybe we'll get a little bit of drunk antics
Speaker 10: before we leave for the day.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I saw we had who was it these laughs?
Speaker 2: I think he said he might want to join at
Speaker 2: one point.
Speaker 10: Okay, cool if he did sound off in the private chat,
Speaker 10: if so, and we'll bring you on. I didn't see
Speaker 10: that earlier I was asking him.
Speaker 2: But yeah, man, the only final point to kind of
Speaker 2: dovetail in with the Semitism context that we've been discussing,
Speaker 2: and then I'll obviously pivot to the Rothschild raid. Was
Speaker 2: the Laura Lumel Lumer post that I had talked to
Speaker 2: you about privately right where she essentially claims that and
Speaker 2: she clearly represents the macade, and I mean, these individuals
Speaker 2: are controlled opposition, and she comes out and says that
Speaker 2: it's the podcaster's fault, right, and they're sowing discord for
Speaker 2: foreign nations in America. She claims there will be a
Speaker 2: massive Islamic terror attack in America and the perpetrators will
Speaker 2: likely have financial ties to podcasters and those who are
Speaker 2: sowing discord for foreign nations in the United States. I
Speaker 2: predict there will be many casualties. And only then will
Speaker 2: it may be set in that people have been conned
Speaker 2: into supporting a terrorist psyop to distract you from the
Speaker 2: threat of Islam while the enemy plotted to destroy our
Speaker 2: country from within with bodied conspiracy theories. It will likely
Speaker 2: be ten times worse than nine to eleven, and it's
Speaker 2: going to trace right back to the woke Reich in
Speaker 2: some way. I just have this sense. So if you
Speaker 2: are to take any of these individuals seriously for at
Speaker 2: least maybe you were just alluding to the fact that
Speaker 2: you think, you know, a very impactful, large, sort of
Speaker 2: aggressive military strike could be in the cards, right, It
Speaker 2: could be on the table, and they could be considering
Speaker 2: going forward with this type of action if only. I
Speaker 2: feel like it's the best way to manufacture consent for
Speaker 2: a conflict that has no public support, because that, I mean,
Speaker 2: no one supported the invasion of Iraq and the terror
Speaker 2: wars until nine to eleven happened. I mean, that was
Speaker 2: very much the project for a new American century. Refer
Speaker 2: to it as I mean, we need a new nine
Speaker 2: to eleven.
Speaker 17: Right.
Speaker 2: They were desperate for public sentiment to take vicious and
Speaker 2: aggressive change into a direction where they would be on
Speaker 2: board for some sort of international conflict at large. And
Speaker 2: that's what I see them. You know, they recycle their
Speaker 2: playbook too often, and this is what ends up exposing them.
Speaker 2: And you know, I'm appreciative of that much. But anyway,
Speaker 2: I'll leave it at that. And the Rothschild raid is
Speaker 2: definitely something that I feel like is important to touch on. Apparently,
Speaker 2: the Rothschild bank was searched in Paris on Friday, all right,
Speaker 2: as part of Epstein's investigation. The raid occurred at Edmund
Speaker 2: de Rothschild's headquarters, with CEO Arianneer Rothschild present. This is
Speaker 2: the very same female, this Arianda Rothschild. This individual was
Speaker 2: legitimately corresponding with Epstein and the emails and the files
Speaker 2: that we saw personally, I even specifically referenced her in
Speaker 2: the context of well, not only was she relevant in
Speaker 2: the human hunting parties, right as far as like I
Speaker 2: forget who she had referred to, you know, establishing in
Speaker 2: terms or I mean basically.
Speaker 10: There were a couple of weird emails, yeah, very something
Speaker 10: about hunting. I mean, obviously we don't know, could have
Speaker 10: been some other but I mean, given what we know, and.
Speaker 2: Not only that, I mean exactly, but I mean she
Speaker 2: she basically was. Well, she's the individual who was responsible
Speaker 2: for the correspondence in regard to the Epstein genealogy, right,
Speaker 2: and the Rothchilds and at Epstein's essentially financing Hitler and
Speaker 2: whenever or at least that he was destitute in Vienna,
Speaker 2: they financed the home that he was staying in allegedly
Speaker 2: at the time for a brief period, so that I
Speaker 2: found to be very much worthwhile because just considering the
Speaker 2: hidden genealogy of one Jeffrey Epstein, again, this is no
Speaker 2: rags story. This man did not come from nothing. He
Speaker 2: was handed the keys to an enterprise. And I think
Speaker 2: this was a long lasting Roy Khane's sexual black mail
Speaker 2: operation stemming out of the Kosher mob. And if you're
Speaker 2: wondering why the Kosher Mafia seems to have a significant
Speaker 2: influence in the current moment, then yeah, maybe take a
Speaker 2: second and reflect on that and then apply it to
Speaker 2: the power paradigm at large. But it goes further than this.
Speaker 2: There's additional reporting the Rothschild raid. Apparently French prosecutors said
Speaker 2: diplomat for Berice Aiden transferred Ewan Security Council briefings to
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein. So this is basically almost in a way,
Speaker 2: it's kind of confirming and at the very least almost
Speaker 2: reinforcing the Prince Andrew allegations of him sharing a vital
Speaker 2: intelligen gents illegally to Jeffrey Epstein in this investigation as well.
Speaker 2: And and so not only that Epstein apparently had access
Speaker 2: to far more classified intelligence and international intelligence as well
Speaker 2: than we probably would have thought possible, but it's it
Speaker 2: seems to be a lot more about state secrets than
Speaker 2: about sexual blackmail at this point, and I'm starting to wonder,
Speaker 2: you know, how much more influence he truly did have
Speaker 2: right other than people want. And I'm not at all
Speaker 2: I'm not at all in a way kind of just
Speaker 2: I don't know, not prioritizing the sexual blackmail and the
Speaker 2: abuse that exists. Obviously, I'm not not undermining the importance
Speaker 2: of that as a priority of focus, but I will say,
Speaker 2: I mean, there's no way that we can imagine a
Speaker 2: world where Jeffrey Epstein wasn't far more influential on Pivotal
Speaker 2: as a as a player in DC and internationally. In
Speaker 2: that context, then yeah, it's it's the roth.
Speaker 11: Childs are paying that guy twenty five million dollars.
Speaker 2: For something, right exactly. And that's what I find very
Speaker 2: concerning is that essentially, yeah, we're we're at a moment
Speaker 2: where you can we can draw the the direct connections
Speaker 2: to Thomas Pritzker going on the what boys and toys?
Speaker 2: But General Petraeus offering him to like military helicopters to
Speaker 2: go play with these Afghan boys. I mean, you have
Speaker 2: that and then you tie that in directly with Prince
Speaker 2: Andrew essentially offering the the illegal intelligence to Epstein on
Speaker 2: the the financial the potential for financially benefiting from the
Speaker 2: Afghan reconstruction project. It's too much to set aside as
Speaker 2: if this doesn't completely align and provide us with another
Speaker 2: kind of avenue and into the amount of influence Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein was was able to wield. But anyway, that's pretty
Speaker 2: much the the as of now kind of the update
Speaker 2: on this, this ongoing Epstein investigation in the UK, because
Speaker 2: it might come to I'm not saying that anyone of
Speaker 2: any real significance will be held accountable for the right reasons,
Speaker 2: but we might legitimately gain a credible window into you know,
Speaker 2: future evidence that that helps reinforce so much of what
Speaker 2: we already believe in terms of this network at large.
Speaker 10: So yep, death by a thousand cuts for those that
Speaker 10: are actually paying attention. All right, let's go ahead and
Speaker 10: bring us some patrons in here. Let's bring on D's
Speaker 10: and rage and then we'll probably.
Speaker 11: Kill it for the day.
Speaker 2: Actually, I'll be right, yeah, sure, yeah.
Speaker 11: Let's go ahead, and I guess we'll get D's in here,
Speaker 11: and what's up the ease. How you doing.
Speaker 3: What's up? Can you hear me?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 11: I can hear you.
Speaker 17: Good.
Speaker 11: What's up?
Speaker 6: Man?
Speaker 10: Pleasure to have you on the show. I think it's
Speaker 10: the first time I've seen you back there, so it's
Speaker 10: the first.
Speaker 1: Time caller, first time listener. No, yeah, just calling from Toronto, man.
Speaker 1: Just wanted to say what's up big Fanny, both of
Speaker 1: you guys.
Speaker 11: So, yeah, oh you're up there in Canada.
Speaker 2: You got any any first first.
Speaker 10: Fifty first staid America's top at Trump's gonna take it
Speaker 10: over for you for us here soon. That's gonna be
Speaker 10: the next place we invade after Cuba.
Speaker 11: Um waiting, I'm waiting. What do you got for us?
Speaker 10: D's you got any any thoughts on today, any questions,
Speaker 10: anything in particular you want to talk about before we
Speaker 10: bring rage in for his I jinks.
Speaker 3: Yeah, just quickly not. I just wanted to just say
Speaker 3: thank you guys for the content.
Speaker 1: I've been making music. That's kind of what I do
Speaker 1: up here, make a little rap songs and stuff.
Speaker 3: I met Brad Binkley last year and to see so yeah,
Speaker 3: just making music for.
Speaker 1: The conspiracy people out here, and yeah, you guys are
Speaker 1: giving me like great content.
Speaker 11: So hell, yeah, you gotta you got like a plug
Speaker 11: or anything. I mean, how's that working? I mean, I
Speaker 11: don't know if you want to plug that.
Speaker 1: Well, basically got an album coming out next next month,
Speaker 1: next month, Yeah, Brendon Circus will be on YouTube and
Speaker 1: Spotify and all that stuff. So yeah, I just wanted
Speaker 1: to say thanks again man for everything. But question, what
Speaker 1: what do you think about Epstein and Bitcoin? You think
Speaker 1: he's the one who created.
Speaker 7: That or.
Speaker 2: He definitely helped fund the core development of bitcoin, and
Speaker 2: that alone is is uh, I think cause for concern
Speaker 2: as far as that is just I believe that uppecially
Speaker 2: Knakamoto was a construct in general, as far as uh,
Speaker 2: you know, I think the translation alone is very very
Speaker 2: strange and should should definitely raise red flags for people
Speaker 2: who are even under the impression that that bitcoin is
Speaker 2: some sort of avenue for for detaching from the financial system,
Speaker 2: like obviously it's the future for central based digital currency
Speaker 2: and and just as far as their central bank, I
Speaker 2: mean and and and and so I do believe that
Speaker 2: there are cryptocurrencies out there like like a manarrow you know,
Speaker 2: that exists that's more of a pirate cryptocurrency that that
Speaker 2: does try and offer a solution that. But still the
Speaker 2: problem I have is that you're always going to be
Speaker 2: fundamentally on the grid, so you're relying upon uh, you know,
Speaker 2: a major UH I don't know what did Klaus Schwab
Speaker 2: worn right? The next essentially what was it, a catastrophic
Speaker 2: blackout would occur essentially, right, that was a targeted sort
Speaker 2: of of a grid down scenario, right where they would
Speaker 2: then usher in this this dystopian New Age Internet system
Speaker 2: that would essentially have the it would make sure that
Speaker 2: that basically the infrastructure was in place of the new Internet, uh,
Speaker 2: for for you to be rendered unable to remain anonymous,
Speaker 2: and you would have to basically provide your ID and
Speaker 2: legitimate government issued identification to even have an online footprint.
Speaker 2: And that's what I'm concerned with. So I don't know
Speaker 2: how much you could ever rely on digital currency, is
Speaker 2: the point I'm making, right, So I believe Epstein certainly
Speaker 2: had some sort of, you know, role to play as
Speaker 2: far as the the I don't know, establishment and uh
Speaker 2: attempted entrenchment of the New Age.
Speaker 3: Do what you said, definitely tether maybe or another maybe.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, there's definitely alternatives that that are out
Speaker 2: there that people have to to make sure they're not
Speaker 2: on the you know, ethereum based and and all these
Speaker 2: various you know, it's it's it's a different it's an
Speaker 2: entire culture that you have to become kind of yeah,
Speaker 2: just in just far too bogged down and just kind
Speaker 2: of I forget the term I was going to use,
Speaker 2: but the point being is that you have to almost
Speaker 2: like learn an entire new language to to engage in that.
Speaker 2: It's not that complicated, but it's still complicated enough. I
Speaker 2: view so much of the digital currencies as money laundering
Speaker 2: assets as well, so I think so much of of
Speaker 2: Epstein's involvement could have just been an avenue of money laundering.
Speaker 11: I mean, he's working with Bannon or I guess, we
Speaker 11: don't know he was working with Bannon for the we
Speaker 11: don't know this how it's Matt, but most people are
Speaker 11: surmising that there's a good chance that Bannon and Epstein
Speaker 11: linked up over his online gaming.
Speaker 10: Currency he was doing, Yeah, he was doing. I believe
Speaker 10: it was for like World of Warcraft. I think Epstein
Speaker 10: might have been in some sort of World World of
Speaker 10: Warcraft gold thing here or something. I've really been a scam. Yeah,
Speaker 10: So it was just like a thing where people online
Speaker 10: World of Warcraft could literally buy gold using money like
Speaker 10: the on game currency, And so that's obviously an opening
Speaker 10: for essentially money laundering right there, and I think Steve
Speaker 10: Bannon had some sort of company tied into that as well.
Speaker 10: So a lot of people are surmised that this is
Speaker 10: sort of so yeah to your point of like that
Speaker 10: he was looking for multiple, multiple avenues of money. Now,
Speaker 10: I don't know, I've heard a lot of people I'm
Speaker 10: I'm kind of out of my depth froming to the
Speaker 10: nerds stuff like this, but I've seen a lot of
Speaker 10: people's surmise that perhaps, yeah, he was involved in like
Speaker 10: some of the early Bitcoin definitely wasn't like interested in
Speaker 10: some of the schisms when it came to like small
Speaker 10: chain large chain type stuff, some of the the the
Speaker 10: like the little theories of people got into. So he
Speaker 10: was really embroiled in all that stuff.
Speaker 11: But it is kind of hard.
Speaker 10: I know, everyone wants to go to the craziest conspiracy
Speaker 10: and be like he's clearly Satoshi maybe I don't know,
Speaker 10: would be all that like blown away. But it's also
Speaker 10: probably just as likely that he was just tapping into
Speaker 10: that spot for his own purposes.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I wanted to say thanks again.
Speaker 1: And last thing I can promote maybe say on the
Speaker 1: way out, I got a song on YouTube is called
Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell Maxwell.
Speaker 3: But yeah, check it out. And other than that, guys,
Speaker 3: you have a great night.
Speaker 11: Robert Maxwell to Xes. By the way, it's D's laughs
Speaker 11: on Instagram and Twitter. Is what you said in the chat.
Speaker 11: So yeah, appreciate you calling in, brother. Do it again.
Speaker 11: Sometime we're gonna bring in Rage to bring it in
Speaker 11: for a landing. Appreciate it. You have a good one,
Speaker 11: all right, Rage, all right, we'll see it. Rage bringing
Speaker 11: in rage. What the fuck is up?
Speaker 3: Yo?
Speaker 2: Rage?
Speaker 3: Bro?
Speaker 2: I gotta tell you something. Did you see the New
Speaker 2: York Post public that basically they ran an article that
Speaker 2: said Trump was briefed that Iran's new Supreme leader is
Speaker 2: probably gay.
Speaker 11: Yeah, which is funny. I actually saw. Yeah, I saw that.
Speaker 10: And Trump's response was apparently like they made a big
Speaker 10: joke about it, like and then everyone was just like, yeah,
Speaker 10: he's gay. But in the same breath, I'd put money
Speaker 10: on it that we're gonna get the same fucking nonsense
Speaker 10: about like herd her throwing gaze off roofs, this that
Speaker 10: like in which they've already done a shiploaded that stuff.
Speaker 17: For that because thes were like, oh, like I don't
Speaker 17: remember what the other whatever every other.
Speaker 11: I was like, by the way, it was like New
Speaker 11: York Posts or something. I think too. It was like
Speaker 11: a paragon of like journalism, but it.
Speaker 10: Was nobody gay, which is I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 10: I just the more I think it's funny, I think
Speaker 10: it probably might be true. It seems like a weird
Speaker 10: That's what I'm saying. I just don't find it funny
Speaker 10: that they're leaning into that, like you hoggy, Yeah, I
Speaker 10: just find it they're leaning into the hoggy propaganda while
Speaker 10: also doing that like he's gay, but also they throw
Speaker 10: gays off roofs.
Speaker 11: You're like, which is a thick one.
Speaker 12: Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 17: But then you go into the like oh like when
Speaker 17: like oh they you know, like I guess all the
Speaker 17: stuff that unfortunately that we look into. It's like, oh yeah,
Speaker 17: they bring all these little boys and they just like
Speaker 17: ship on their chests and like everything's gay, Like I mean,
Speaker 17: it holds a hole to to them at that point,
Speaker 17: like when you live in the goddamn desert.
Speaker 2: I mean you're bacha bazi is what you're talking about,
Speaker 2: like certain certain cultural aspects of of Yeah they were
Speaker 2: boys to make it dance. Yeah, yeah, it really is that.
Speaker 2: There's a And it's like which I was.
Speaker 12: Black people are like, we invented twerking, and I'm like,
Speaker 12: I don't know.
Speaker 17: I think those you know, the real black eaking a
Speaker 17: couple hundred years ago.
Speaker 2: I know, what do we got, Jacob? We got another call? Brother?
Speaker 2: Oh okay, that's weird. He's teasing brother's breaking news guys,
Speaker 2: top us government official at FEMA. I mean, he says
Speaker 2: he involuntarily teleported fifty miles away to waffle house and
Speaker 2: this was all against Yeah, he's.
Speaker 11: What the fuck?
Speaker 12: Yeah yeah, I was like a teleport to a waffle house.
Speaker 2: Right now, I'm like, first of all, the problem lies
Speaker 2: within the fact that you were teleported to waffle house.
Speaker 3: You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 12: He didn't leave it a black eye. I don't believe it.
Speaker 11: I mean, if you were gonna, if you were going
Speaker 11: to if you have some sort of weird teleportation system
Speaker 11: that you had to like accept static spots for it,
Speaker 11: waffle House would be the place to do that.
Speaker 17: I mean like, yeah, I never saw this Scott Bakula
Speaker 17: teleport to a waffle house.
Speaker 12: No, And he was always on some other ship. It's
Speaker 12: got back.
Speaker 17: He'll be like what it's like that one episode he's like,
Speaker 17: I'm retarded, but he was always on some other ship,
Speaker 17: like he's he's teleporting it.
Speaker 12: And then he's like, I guess this guide was always
Speaker 12: like some you know, very horny ass dude and he's.
Speaker 17: Like, oh, wow, you're in the You're in the nineteen forties,
Speaker 17: so let's fuck Marilyn Monroe, which is one episode I
Speaker 17: did see where Marilyn Monroe is in the pool.
Speaker 12: And he's like, look, you're just gonna fuck her or not?
Speaker 2: And I like, what, wow, interesting dude.
Speaker 17: That quantum leap is like they brought the new or
Speaker 17: when they brought it back, and it was like some
Speaker 17: Asian dude was like what is it?
Speaker 12: No one's gonna believe this, Like who's gonna They're just
Speaker 12: like there was.
Speaker 17: Some no matter what time you teleport, I mean, I guess,
Speaker 17: worst case scenario, you brought a black dude in it,
Speaker 17: but second.
Speaker 12: Worst you brought an Asian Like what are you gonna
Speaker 12: do at.
Speaker 17: What point in time, are you going to teleport where
Speaker 17: they're like, yeah, let the Asian dude do it like
Speaker 17: it's it's like it wasn't gonna work, and obviously it
Speaker 17: canceled after the first season, right, I gotta.
Speaker 11: Show you something.
Speaker 2: Rage.
Speaker 10: This is what I think about, especially when you're a
Speaker 10: ship house and you call into the show.
Speaker 12: This is like, yes, whoa what what?
Speaker 11: Whoat? Rage?
Speaker 10: Slow down? I want to show you something. I want
Speaker 10: to show you something that's like what I am. This
Speaker 10: is this is what I think about about when your
Speaker 10: ship house and you call in. It's also kind of
Speaker 10: like a go to for like a drunk or whatever.
Speaker 10: This is what I find funny.
Speaker 11: But watch this. This is a Zach and Maury make
Speaker 11: a porno. This is a scene from that movie.
Speaker 14: Don't tell me.
Speaker 12: It's a fucking where he's like, I just.
Speaker 11: Watch, just watch, just watch.
Speaker 1: Fucking roth fits brother, the quarterback is all fucking hug it,
Speaker 1: chug it football.
Speaker 7: O.
Speaker 12: Night. I hate the fucking Steelers.
Speaker 10: But yeah, yeah, by the way, the little additional context,
Speaker 10: he's like, I'm just here to get it.
Speaker 12: He's a you know, fucking Roethlisberger hug middle school.
Speaker 11: Yeah, that's what I always say, whenever someone's being incomprehensible
Speaker 11: and drunk, I'm dugging football.
Speaker 10: But yeah, little extra contexts, little extra contact. For those
Speaker 10: who haven't seen the movie, he literally just walked into
Speaker 10: the like the their little like coffee shop, coffee count yeah,
Speaker 10: and they're they're fucking in the porto and he just
Speaker 10: walks in and tries to order a coffee.
Speaker 12: So it's a great movie. By the way, it is
Speaker 12: a great movie.
Speaker 11: It's a very funny movie.
Speaker 10: Justin long is hilarious, and it's probably one of the
Speaker 10: greatest greatest cameo.
Speaker 17: Uh, you're not my demographic. What's your demographic? He's like,
Speaker 17: you love pussy, Yeah, not you. I film movies.
Speaker 12: Uh. He's like uh, And he's like, oh any women?
Speaker 12: No women?
Speaker 2: Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so bad.
Speaker 2: Ben Roethlisberger had to commit sexual assault in that bath.
Speaker 12: I hate to see that.
Speaker 17: I'm a Cowboys fan, so I fucking fucked the Steelers,
Speaker 17: fucked the Eagles big time.
Speaker 12: But when Ben Roethlisberger went down for rape, I was like,
Speaker 12: I knew it.
Speaker 11: I knew it. Such a raper.
Speaker 10: He does look like a big old raper, all right, rage,
Speaker 10: I think we've we're I think we're ready to bring
Speaker 10: get it out of here. Appreciate you coming in, calling
Speaker 10: in Rage, bringing us in for a landing. I'm glad
Speaker 10: we saved you for last. That was probably better choice.
Speaker 10: But Rage, you want to say bye to the people.
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 12: Also, I know I had something to talk about.
Speaker 11: It didn't seem like that's what I said by but
Speaker 11: go ahead.
Speaker 12: Oh I hate being put on the spot ship, but
Speaker 12: it was. God damn it, give me one second.
Speaker 11: Okay, Rage just left. I don't know if this is
Speaker 11: like a weird joke or it was something.
Speaker 12: Can you hear me?
Speaker 2: We can hear you, Yeah, I hear you.
Speaker 12: Fuck, it's probably word. No, I'm probably just wasting my
Speaker 12: goddamn time.
Speaker 11: And I don't know what's going on here right, So
Speaker 11: I don't know.
Speaker 12: Fuck, God damn it. I wrote.
Speaker 17: I read a book in nineteen eighty seven. There it
Speaker 17: was called after the Ball, and uh, they're talking about
Speaker 17: I guess bring it, like like.
Speaker 12: Simmering in the gay ship, and.
Speaker 17: The book's called after the book's called after the Ball,
Speaker 17: which I don't know. That's like has to be like
Speaker 17: some kind of innuendo, but they're basically I don't know.
Speaker 17: Long story short, they're like, well, if we let the
Speaker 17: straight people, They're like, if we get them used to
Speaker 17: being wet, they're not gonna bitch about us turning off,
Speaker 17: you know, the the faucet, Like if we just keep
Speaker 17: it on.
Speaker 12: They're You're like a certain time, they're gonna get used
Speaker 12: to being wet.
Speaker 17: And this is me drunkly ranting about it, but that's
Speaker 17: like what it came to it as far as like
Speaker 17: how they're trickling in gay ship and need to hear
Speaker 17: they have a lot of gay friends and they're what
Speaker 17: the fuck, but.
Speaker 12: How they're trickling.
Speaker 17: Into putting in all the extra ship and like in
Speaker 17: the movies, and like why is every movie you have
Speaker 17: to have a gayer? Like how you know, when you're
Speaker 17: growing up, it's like every episode maybe has like one
Speaker 17: gay person, but now everyone has to be gay, everyone
Speaker 17: has to be trains and YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 12: I mean, it's a bad rant for me to go
Speaker 12: off on.
Speaker 10: Because it's great, that's your show for today. Guys came
Speaker 10: to my head right now, all right, ut me on
Speaker 10: the spot, So you on this spot. I don't think
Speaker 10: it's qualified putting the spot, but I'm glad you came
Speaker 10: on the spot rage. We're gonna let you go go
Speaker 10: hucket chuck at football, buddy, but we love you. Come
Speaker 10: hunk at chuck a football with us anytime.
Speaker 11: Just let us know that you're in that.
Speaker 12: That it's crazy. I know this is all Jacob's fault.
Speaker 11: Oh my god, Oh I thought you were going somewhere that. Yeah,
Speaker 11: it'saw Jacob's fault.
Speaker 10: You can keep us on format with our calls and
Speaker 10: uh an intermission and he let chaos take the four
Speaker 10: our rage. We're gonna let you go, love you brother,
Speaker 10: kick it you out before we get other and see it, buddy.
Speaker 11: We're out of here, so you ready to get out
Speaker 11: of here. Let's do plugs, get the fuck out?
Speaker 2: Sound good? All right, guys, you already know you can
Speaker 2: find me at the end of class podcast. Definitely subscribe
Speaker 2: to YouTube and The Rumble if you have the means
Speaker 2: the Patreon as well. Other than that, I did think,
Speaker 2: did you want to use the one of the lego
Speaker 2: you know, basically the lego themed state sponsored ran war
Speaker 2: propaganda videos as an ultro because I thought it, okay,
Speaker 2: let's do it. Because I thought that there's there was
Speaker 2: a Wall Street Journal article that I just saw from
Speaker 2: the twenty second I think it was that ran with
Speaker 2: the headline that said, the Lego themed Iranian propaganda winging
Speaker 2: its way around the Internet is not an anomaly. It's
Speaker 2: a sign of how the global information wars are being waged.
Speaker 2: And then it goes into how Lego became a go
Speaker 2: to meme of the propaganda wars, and that again, I
Speaker 2: know we played last week, We played the original video
Speaker 2: from The Independent when they had published it, and and
Speaker 2: we played it as an outro, so we didn't get
Speaker 2: to quite you know, reference actively just the most the
Speaker 2: most extraordinary and ridiculous aspects of it. But the fact
Speaker 2: that you have bb net y'a who just like running,
Speaker 2: uh you know, fleeing from from danger in these tunnels,
Speaker 2: right and uh and yeah, you have these like Hasidic
Speaker 2: Jews who are basically crying while they're fleeing from drone
Speaker 2: strikes and things of that nature. It's just again a
Speaker 2: reflection of the cartoonish phase of reality we have truly entered.
Speaker 11: And this is some which we were saying before the show.
Speaker 10: I would like to put in a request to the
Speaker 10: Iranian overlords here if you can do that, everything is
Speaker 10: awesome song, but with Iranian propaganda and Iranian you know,
Speaker 10: little lego people that would be super hype just saying
Speaker 10: but go on a sorry.
Speaker 2: Honestly, no, no, you're good. I just thought that it's
Speaker 2: a great example of, you know, the beyond the pale,
Speaker 2: just as the effect of the cartoonish reality that we
Speaker 2: are currently residing in, and the fact that this this
Speaker 2: perfectly represents everything that I never imagined as far as
Speaker 2: the average person being willing to accept, you know, and
Speaker 2: and and yes, this might be an appeal to the
Speaker 2: younger generations to to make to romanticize war, whatever the
Speaker 2: case may be, but I legitimately view this as kind
Speaker 2: of almost a condemnation of our our intellectual ability at large,
Speaker 2: as as a as a public, as a you know,
Speaker 2: just our inability to to just kind of navigate the
Speaker 2: waters of propaganda, and and just in a in a
Speaker 2: real constructive way diagnose these these conflicts and these problems,
Speaker 2: and these these especially the legislative actions that that cause
Speaker 2: the the ultimate kind of result and outcome that are
Speaker 2: far just far too many people are are under aware
Speaker 2: and and therefore they are kind of residing at that
Speaker 2: surface level and unable to engage in reality as as
Speaker 2: as it truly presents itself. And and so here we
Speaker 2: are and in the clown world phase, post reality phase,
Speaker 2: where basically we're relying on Iranian war propaganda that's lego
Speaker 2: themed to drag our politicians and elected representatives through the mud.
Speaker 2: And honestly, they're doing a great job. As much as
Speaker 2: I just completely in opposition philosophically to any government or
Speaker 2: administration of any kind that that is in power. Yeah,
Speaker 2: we're just the structured government, honestly, you know, it's it's
Speaker 2: obviously that it's obvious that that I kind of reject
Speaker 2: this this at face value in a real way, but
Speaker 2: still appreciate the fact that if you didn't notice, at
Speaker 2: the end of last week's episode when we did play
Speaker 2: the video, they reference the American and Israeli regime as terrorists, right,
Speaker 2: who have effectively, you know, targeted civilian casualties and children
Speaker 2: for that matter. And they're not wrong, right, And that's
Speaker 2: the only point that I wanted to make before we
Speaker 2: played the video is is And by the way, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna play the stut Peters version, which is from an
Speaker 2: Iranian basically from an Iranian publication, but specifically, I just
Speaker 2: thought this is the funniest version that I've seen go viral,
Speaker 2: and stut Peter specifically had posted it and he's he
Speaker 2: said in his tweet of this video, Iran clown Trump
Speaker 2: is a pedophile, net and Yahoo puppet, an overall loser
Speaker 2: in their latest Lego hype video, and it is honestly hilarious.
Speaker 2: But there was an additional, you know, officially state sanctioned
Speaker 2: propagandistic video, Lego themed, that Iran posted of Lego Trump
Speaker 2: basically in full blown sweat as navy. The Navy basically
Speaker 2: attacks tankers and warships and deploys minds the Iranian Navy
Speaker 2: in the straight of horn moves, And so I did
Speaker 2: think again, it's it's, uh, we're just at this, this
Speaker 2: unprecedented kind of moment that that is unbelievable, you know,
Speaker 2: to to witness. So that's that's that. Honestly, I'll bring
Speaker 2: up the stup Peters tweet and Uh, I love you, brother,
Speaker 2: I love all of you. I appreciate you showing up
Speaker 2: and and giving us uh the opportunity to run our
Speaker 2: mouths and in the apocalypse right as I see you
Speaker 2: continually uh post your solo interviews with with what what's
Speaker 2: his name?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 2: Damn it? Why am I forgetting his name? Yeah, Tyler?
Speaker 2: And then you had Yeah, I love Tyler. By the way,
Speaker 2: I met him at bro Grove. He was great, But uh,
Speaker 2: I'm forgetting Uh his name starts with an R. I
Speaker 2: don't know why I'm forgetting his name right now. He
Speaker 2: basically was in my a for a while. He works
Speaker 2: on a construction crew, right, you know, I'm a libertarian, dude.
Speaker 2: You just had him on a couple of times. Why
Speaker 2: the fuck am I forgetting his name?
Speaker 11: A construction guy I don't know?
Speaker 2: Read yes, dude, thank you read cover Bell. Yeah, that's
Speaker 2: the name. I don't know why the hell it was
Speaker 2: escaping me. But anyway, I loved the title for your
Speaker 2: Your Conversations with Red and Uh because it is It's
Speaker 2: just so poignant and applicable to the current moment, and
Speaker 2: it does feel like we're just having a casual conversation
Speaker 2: with a buddy and during the apocalypse, right, and it's
Speaker 2: just kind of extraordinary to to uh, yeah, I don't
Speaker 2: know witness again firsten, So I love you, brother, I
Speaker 2: love you too.
Speaker 10: Let me drop my plugs before we play that real
Speaker 10: quick for those who want to uh, those who want
Speaker 10: to support what I'm doing over here, label like share subscribe,
Speaker 10: commonly a five star review on iTunes, through Spotify. You
Speaker 10: can find the show on YouTube, Rumble, all the major
Speaker 10: audio pod catchers, and Twitter as well. On Twitter that's
Speaker 10: at Tara Gang Jose Ever or else that's the No
Speaker 10: Way Jose podcast.
Speaker 11: Just search it up. You'll find me there.
Speaker 10: For those who want to support me, the best way
Speaker 10: you can, you do the money over at patreon dot com.
Speaker 10: So with No Way Hose twenty twenty the lowest levels
Speaker 10: two bucks that gives you access to early episodes. I
Speaker 10: try to do about one to two of those per week.
Speaker 10: Give you guys access to those early episodes. Try to
Speaker 10: keep up three to four behind the pay well and
Speaker 10: e given time. You can also get access to add
Speaker 10: for YOURSS feed. You get access to Telegram, the access
Speaker 10: to pre show, post show and video calls on this
Speaker 10: show right here Already Dead, which is on Tuesdays at
Speaker 10: nine thirty pm Eastern. I also give a big shout
Speaker 10: out to my sponsors, which the highest level of my
Speaker 10: Patreon which little funn Hey, the guy we were talking
Speaker 10: to you earlier right here Rex Crassis says he's looking. Says,
Speaker 10: if you guys are looking for a sponsor, if they
Speaker 10: were interested, I don't know what you mean by that,
Speaker 10: but definitely hit us up. I like money, Austin likes money.
Speaker 10: Assuming you have a nice product, I think it will
Speaker 10: be we'll be on board with that. I don't know,
Speaker 10: I mean obviously hit us up. I don't know if
Speaker 10: maybe you just mean like a patron sponsor. I'm open
Speaker 10: to whatever there, but the patrons I read off every
Speaker 10: the patron sponsors the highest level of my Patreon, I
Speaker 10: read them off every episode of the Big thank you
Speaker 10: for their support real quick. I'd just say a super
Speaker 10: chat coming in on the wire, geitub Enoch sending in
Speaker 10: a five bucks to either me or Aus and I'm
Speaker 10: not sure which one of us it is, but either way,
Speaker 10: thank you, he says, Thanks y'all. Thank you to you
Speaker 10: as well, and a big thank you to my Patreon
Speaker 10: sponsors the highest level. Big thank you to Toad, my
Speaker 10: previous coast and tagging at Leonard toadals Oft, Abrogate these
Speaker 10: at zeovir c k at Underscore in Mizial, tim Total
Speaker 10: at johny Cleebold, big fan of the show tour May
Speaker 10: at Wayne Tack is one of here card for kids.
Speaker 10: No free lunch jack Mark, Vestbill and Jacobin or grat
Speaker 10: the biblic Plannergy Podcast. I'll get you guys tomorrow around
Speaker 10: eleven am Eastern give or take on the Morning Show
Speaker 10: The Morning Dump. That's my daily show where I try
Speaker 10: to stream around around around eleven am Monday through Friday.
Speaker 10: So pop in there if you want to hang out.
Speaker 10: But anyways, sorry, I know a lot of plugs there.
Speaker 10: But enjoy this outro. We'll see you guys on the
Speaker 10: next one. See you guys already dead heads on the
Speaker 10: flip side.
Speaker 16: Yeah, you crush the horse and just to fight the
Speaker 16: gret sacrifice John boys for a lie.
Speaker 14: Listen Yeah.
Speaker 16: Yeah, make America pressure gain at.
Speaker 14: Your tails that you're crazy. Yeah, make America great again.
Speaker 14: Now you will see what happens. Yeah, watch this sacred defense.
Speaker 16: We're protecting the soil while you sacrifice soul just to
Speaker 16: pay for your spoil. You put your in the blow,
Speaker 16: sitting on your throne. Now we turning every base into.
Speaker 14: A bed of stone. Its smutter house, a trap you
Speaker 14: couldn't see. Welcome to the graveyard and your vanity.
Speaker 18: You seecrets, I leave you. The pressure is rising. Were
Speaker 18: locked on the target and now you are hid. I
Speaker 18: see here, we're spelling that your name. Send him to
Speaker 18: the sau that you the doll even wanted to blame
Speaker 18: bleed the fourth coming. While you're shaking in your sweet
Speaker 18: and Lois.
Speaker 14: Say dash at the feet. That was spelling nothing to night.
Speaker 16: Send them to the saw that you're the only one
Speaker 16: to play the fourth While you're shaking in your sweet
Speaker 16: and Lois half.
Speaker 14: Feet fighting in your school hot enough things goes.
Speaker 16: You sent your boys down the bloody because not a
Speaker 16: revenge for.
Speaker 14: The leader's blood. It's pure in mind.
Speaker 16: Every drop of his blood is a missleing on the
Speaker 16: line you got. You took him out doft the fire
Speaker 16: was dead.
Speaker 14: But another coming name is standing in their head.
Speaker 16: Yeah you strike one. Damn we just shatter your brain.
Speaker 16: We put another in the list common name. Again, the
Speaker 16: secrets are lead the trushing this rising. Were locked on
Speaker 16: the target and now you are lois care we spelling
Speaker 16: nothing name. Send them to the slaughter. You the only
Speaker 16: want to blame bleeding four coming. While you're shaking in
Speaker 16: your sweet.
Speaker 15: Hell Losa dash he Losi, you're spending nothing name. Send
Speaker 15: them to the slaughter You the only one to blame.
Speaker 15: Plea the boy puppet when you're shaking him in sweet see.
Speaker 16: Take that as defeat secret defense in the home land, Holy.
Speaker 14: Secret DEFENSEI take the sacred defense.
Speaker 16: In the hold, Secret sacred defense for the hold.
Speaker 14: The slaughter house is open. The callo to see um.