WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.340 --> 00:00:30.980
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget Discord. Discord.SecurityThisWeek.com. Lots of good stuff happening there. Yeah,

2
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it. So on with the podcast. Do

3
00:00:33.840 --> 00:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you suffer from shyness? Do you sometimes wish you were

4
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:42.369
<v Speaker 1>more assertive? Ask your doctor about tequila.

5
00:00:47.530 --> 00:00:47.869
<v Speaker 2>Or donut.

6
00:00:49.659 --> 00:00:51.859
<v Speaker 3>Side effects may cause beer goggles.

7
00:00:52.179 --> 00:00:54.350
<v Speaker 1>When my wife and I started dating, she said, I'm

8
00:00:54.409 --> 00:01:07.519
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to drink tequila. All right. We've got a

9
00:01:07.560 --> 00:01:10.540
<v Speaker 1>few stories for you today. This is Security This Week,

10
00:01:10.579 --> 00:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way.

11
00:01:10.959 --> 00:01:11.420
<v Speaker 4>I'm Carl.

12
00:01:11.439 --> 00:01:15.329
<v Speaker 1>That's Dwayne and Patrick. This week, This is kind of

13
00:01:15.750 --> 00:01:19.030
<v Speaker 1>good news, I think, but it confirms at least what

14
00:01:19.049 --> 00:01:23.329
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about all the time. Sys of Vulnerability Review. Old,

15
00:01:23.750 --> 00:01:26.569
<v Speaker 1>simple flaws drive most breaches.

16
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:27.890
<v Speaker 2>Oldies but goodies.

17
00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Oldies but goodies.

18
00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

19
00:01:30.099 --> 00:01:30.579
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

20
00:01:30.739 --> 00:01:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Wayne's still using printer defects from years ago.

21
00:01:34.180 --> 00:01:35.099
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean....

22
00:01:37.609 --> 00:01:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Sequel injections been on the top of the list for

23
00:01:40.859 --> 00:01:41.439
<v Speaker 3>how long?

24
00:01:41.579 --> 00:01:41.739
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

25
00:01:41.780 --> 00:01:41.980
<v Speaker 5>Right.

26
00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:43.180
<v Speaker 2>Since they started the list.

27
00:01:43.219 --> 00:01:43.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

28
00:01:43.459 --> 00:01:44.420
<v Speaker 3>Since the list began.

29
00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:44.859
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

30
00:01:45.439 --> 00:01:48.599
<v Speaker 3>It's like that FBI's, you know, top 10 people to get.

31
00:01:48.719 --> 00:01:50.760
<v Speaker 3>It's still, it's the same, it's the same people.

32
00:01:50.939 --> 00:01:52.719
<v Speaker 1>The thing here is that we talk about AI as

33
00:01:52.780 --> 00:01:55.290
<v Speaker 1>being evil and models being evil, which is the.

34
00:01:55.750 --> 00:01:56.890
<v Speaker 5>Title of this show.

35
00:01:56.950 --> 00:02:01.670
<v Speaker 1>But, but, you know, in fact, most problems are caused

36
00:02:01.750 --> 00:02:03.969
<v Speaker 1>by old, old issues.

37
00:02:04.010 --> 00:02:04.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah.

38
00:02:04.930 --> 00:02:07.629
<v Speaker 2>We'll have the longest time for people to, figure out

39
00:02:07.670 --> 00:02:10.689
<v Speaker 2>how to exploit them for the exploits to mature and

40
00:02:10.729 --> 00:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>get more of that, uh, less variable.

41
00:02:13.469 --> 00:02:13.740
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

42
00:02:13.780 --> 00:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to, I'm going to take the negative

43
00:02:15.099 --> 00:02:17.060
<v Speaker 3>side of that, Patrick. We've also had a lot more

44
00:02:17.099 --> 00:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>time to understand how they work so that people, developers

45
00:02:20.039 --> 00:02:21.860
<v Speaker 3>should be actually fixing them.

46
00:02:22.020 --> 00:02:24.180
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I I'm on, I'm all on board. I'm

47
00:02:24.199 --> 00:02:26.699
<v Speaker 2>just saying you give the hackers, you give the hacker

48
00:02:26.740 --> 00:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>community a decade and script kitties will even be proficient.

49
00:02:30.969 --> 00:02:31.250
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

50
00:02:31.259 --> 00:02:33.189
<v Speaker 3>So it, you know, it goes through and it's an

51
00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:36.199
<v Speaker 3>interesting breakdown. There's, um, if you guys, click if at

52
00:02:36.219 --> 00:02:37.719
<v Speaker 3>some point if you click on the links to the

53
00:02:37.780 --> 00:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>show you'll see they break down some of the different

54
00:02:40.699 --> 00:02:43.520
<v Speaker 3>types of attacks and and it's not saying the most

55
00:02:43.759 --> 00:02:45.870
<v Speaker 3>dangerous ones are the ones that have been around forever

56
00:02:45.879 --> 00:02:49.009
<v Speaker 3>it's just the most frequent ones um there are you

57
00:02:49.030 --> 00:02:52.330
<v Speaker 3>know input validation errors right how many times have we

58
00:02:52.349 --> 00:02:55.509
<v Speaker 3>told you on the show never trust the user right

59
00:02:55.569 --> 00:02:57.949
<v Speaker 3>whether they're talking to you or whether they call you

60
00:02:58.009 --> 00:03:00.449
<v Speaker 3>and say they want to switch their bank account or

61
00:03:00.509 --> 00:03:03.069
<v Speaker 3>whether it's their typing data in the browser, right?

62
00:03:03.250 --> 00:03:06.909
<v Speaker 2>Or whether you can imagine how they could exploit it.

63
00:03:07.069 --> 00:03:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely.

64
00:03:08.259 --> 00:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Because you can't imagine it doesn't mean it's not possible.

65
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and actually, not to foreshadow a little bit, but

66
00:03:15.319 --> 00:03:18.060
<v Speaker 3>one of our stories here, we will talk about trusting

67
00:03:18.099 --> 00:03:19.990
<v Speaker 3>the user and their browser a little bit too much,

68
00:03:20.090 --> 00:03:23.150
<v Speaker 3>which caused untold damages.

69
00:03:23.270 --> 00:03:24.169
<v Speaker 2>Hilarity.

70
00:03:24.569 --> 00:03:27.110
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, injection issues, here again.

71
00:03:27.620 --> 00:03:27.879
<v Speaker 5>Right?

72
00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:31.740
<v Speaker 3>We just talked about SQL injection. So for those of

73
00:03:31.780 --> 00:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you who may or may not, I don't know, perform

74
00:03:35.560 --> 00:03:36.469
<v Speaker 3>injection all the time.

75
00:03:38.889 --> 00:03:39.349
<v Speaker 1>Enough said.

76
00:03:39.409 --> 00:03:45.469
<v Speaker 3>Walk that fine line. An injection issue is where you're

77
00:03:45.509 --> 00:03:50.169
<v Speaker 3>expecting the user to give you input of some sort, right?

78
00:03:50.229 --> 00:03:53.229
<v Speaker 3>Whether it's oh, what language do I want the browser in?

79
00:03:53.449 --> 00:03:55.469
<v Speaker 3>What day do I want my, you know, my tea

80
00:03:55.509 --> 00:03:56.449
<v Speaker 3>time at this golf.

81
00:03:56.270 --> 00:03:57.189
<v Speaker 5>Course, whatever it may be.

82
00:03:57.210 --> 00:03:58.270
<v Speaker 2>Like your steak cooked.

83
00:03:58.610 --> 00:03:59.389
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly.

84
00:03:59.669 --> 00:04:01.550
<v Speaker 3>You know, whatever you're expecting the user to give you

85
00:04:02.310 --> 00:04:05.069
<v Speaker 3>or expecting to come from the user's browser, more importantly,

86
00:04:05.849 --> 00:04:08.129
<v Speaker 3>because a lot of people will just assume, hey, I

87
00:04:08.169 --> 00:04:11.550
<v Speaker 3>got five fields on this that the user can fill out.

88
00:04:11.849 --> 00:04:14.270
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I'm expecting. But there's 15 other fields

89
00:04:14.310 --> 00:04:16.329
<v Speaker 3>I take from that, that I'm just holding variables in

90
00:04:16.350 --> 00:04:16.670
<v Speaker 3>the browser.

91
00:04:16.689 --> 00:04:19.500
<v Speaker 2>But the text ones are the dangerous ones is the lead.

92
00:04:20.259 --> 00:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, exactly. Developers always assume if a user can type

93
00:04:24.740 --> 00:04:26.699
<v Speaker 3>in it, it's dangerous and I should keep an eye

94
00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:29.639
<v Speaker 3>on it. But the problem is every field that gets

95
00:04:29.699 --> 00:04:32.839
<v Speaker 3>submitted back on that form is something the user can edit.

96
00:04:32.879 --> 00:04:33.339
<v Speaker 2>Inject.

97
00:04:33.399 --> 00:04:38.500
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, right, and inject into. So these are the types

98
00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:43.220
<v Speaker 3>of issues, and they pop up. So input validation, memory

99
00:04:43.279 --> 00:04:46.399
<v Speaker 3>safety issues, we talk about buffer overruns and that sort

100
00:04:46.420 --> 00:04:51.370
<v Speaker 3>of stuff, injections, access control deficiencies. So we've talked about

101
00:04:51.850 --> 00:04:53.870
<v Speaker 3>these are probably the core.

102
00:04:53.529 --> 00:04:55.730
<v Speaker 5>Of most of the stories we've talked about. Yep.

103
00:04:56.029 --> 00:04:58.170
<v Speaker 3>Is, you know, every time it comes back to, oh,

104
00:04:58.230 --> 00:05:01.360
<v Speaker 3>and then, you know, the keys were in the page or, oh,

105
00:05:02.189 --> 00:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>then the user did, you know, or one equals one

106
00:05:04.259 --> 00:05:05.899
<v Speaker 3>and got access to the whole site, right?

107
00:05:05.939 --> 00:05:08.439
<v Speaker 1>And social engineering tops the list too. I mean, that's

108
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:11.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of the root of all, the radix malorium.

109
00:05:11.939 --> 00:05:13.040
<v Speaker 5>The root of all evil.

110
00:05:13.579 --> 00:05:14.220
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

111
00:05:14.300 --> 00:05:15.620
<v Speaker 5>Radix malorium.

112
00:05:16.139 --> 00:05:16.740
<v Speaker 1>Malorum.

113
00:05:16.779 --> 00:05:17.699
<v Speaker 3>Did you just make that up?

114
00:05:18.189 --> 00:05:19.089
<v Speaker 1>Radix malorum.

115
00:05:19.129 --> 00:05:20.129
<v Speaker 5>Radix malorum.

116
00:05:21.129 --> 00:05:24.660
<v Speaker 1>So, it's from the Latin, radix malorum est cupiditas.

117
00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:26.860
<v Speaker 5>You know, avarice is the root of all evil.

118
00:05:27.319 --> 00:05:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Damn, Carl.

119
00:05:27.740 --> 00:05:28.620
<v Speaker 1>So, radix malorum.

120
00:05:28.959 --> 00:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

121
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:30.939
<v Speaker 5>I don't even know what to say about that, Carl.

122
00:05:30.959 --> 00:05:32.860
<v Speaker 1>I went to school. What can I say? I'm sorry.

123
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:37.970
<v Speaker 3>I learned a few things. Patrick, our boy is so smart.

124
00:05:41.810 --> 00:05:43.129
<v Speaker 3>Your mom and I are so proud, Carl.

125
00:05:43.189 --> 00:05:43.730
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, okay.

126
00:05:46.209 --> 00:05:48.470
<v Speaker 2>Okay. In fact, I'm... Parabellum.

127
00:05:48.850 --> 00:05:53.870
<v Speaker 1>All right. So the next one is kind of, seems important.

128
00:05:54.529 --> 00:05:59.569
<v Speaker 1>The proof of concept published for Linux kernel priv-esque flaw.

129
00:06:00.350 --> 00:06:02.029
<v Speaker 1>And I was reading it and I was trying to

130
00:06:02.069 --> 00:06:05.029
<v Speaker 1>figure out how the heck could, you know, how hard

131
00:06:05.089 --> 00:06:07.430
<v Speaker 1>is it to, how easy is it for somebody to

132
00:06:07.470 --> 00:06:09.329
<v Speaker 1>be exploited if they have a Linux box that's on

133
00:06:09.350 --> 00:06:13.110
<v Speaker 1>the internet? Turns out they have to have a user account, right?

134
00:06:13.750 --> 00:06:14.189
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

135
00:06:14.329 --> 00:06:16.189
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is, this is a straight up privask

136
00:06:16.269 --> 00:06:20.279
<v Speaker 3>and it's interesting. It's an interesting one. Um, uh, you know, uh,

137
00:06:20.360 --> 00:06:21.569
<v Speaker 3>walking through the attack.

138
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:22.300
<v Speaker 5>Right?

139
00:06:22.759 --> 00:06:25.579
<v Speaker 3>Um, it says the issue resides in the, I don't

140
00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:28.480
<v Speaker 3>worry about the functions, but the IO poll get ownership function.

141
00:06:28.680 --> 00:06:29.180
<v Speaker 5>Okay, great.

142
00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:32.279
<v Speaker 3>So there's some sort of function that pulls ownership. It

143
00:06:32.399 --> 00:06:36.879
<v Speaker 3>uses a signed comparison to check a specific slow path.

144
00:06:36.920 --> 00:06:38.300
<v Speaker 3>Don't worry about slow path thresholds.

145
00:06:38.519 --> 00:06:41.490
<v Speaker 1>Signed meaning both negative and positive.

146
00:06:41.550 --> 00:06:42.019
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

147
00:06:42.110 --> 00:06:44.389
<v Speaker 3>That's what I want to focus on. Yeah, exactly. Um,

148
00:06:44.930 --> 00:06:48.069
<v Speaker 3>so I, I had this conversation, uh, earlier with one

149
00:06:48.089 --> 00:06:52.720
<v Speaker 3>of my children just yesterday, actually. Um, And we were

150
00:06:52.759 --> 00:06:58.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about the memory structures of variables. And if you

151
00:06:58.399 --> 00:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>take an int, an integer, right, a number, and you

152
00:07:04.279 --> 00:07:07.079
<v Speaker 3>make it a variable, there's a certain size that you

153
00:07:07.110 --> 00:07:12.209
<v Speaker 3>can store in that structure. And the size of the

154
00:07:12.230 --> 00:07:14.769
<v Speaker 3>variable might be, you know, 32767, right? If it's a

155
00:07:14.810 --> 00:07:20.519
<v Speaker 3>signed integer, right? or it might be 65,000 if it's

156
00:07:20.540 --> 00:07:24.370
<v Speaker 3>an unsigned integer because the last bit is generally used

157
00:07:24.449 --> 00:07:27.569
<v Speaker 3>as to whether the number is negative or positive. So

158
00:07:27.589 --> 00:07:30.829
<v Speaker 3>if you say it's unsigned, right, then you can have

159
00:07:30.870 --> 00:07:34.009
<v Speaker 3>a much larger number, but you can't ever have a negative.

160
00:07:34.209 --> 00:07:38.860
<v Speaker 3>If you say it's a signed variable, then you have,

161
00:07:39.100 --> 00:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, positive 32767 and negative 32767, let's say, right?

162
00:07:43.620 --> 00:07:48.939
<v Speaker 3>So you have the same kind of amount of, of

163
00:07:49.279 --> 00:07:53.009
<v Speaker 3>variability in there, just whether it's negative or positive. So

164
00:07:53.050 --> 00:07:57.699
<v Speaker 3>this is a classic problem, more with C and C

165
00:07:57.699 --> 00:08:01.310
<v Speaker 3>+ + than other programming languages, where you had to

166
00:08:01.389 --> 00:08:05.550
<v Speaker 3>declare whether this was a signed or an unsigned integer.

167
00:08:06.470 --> 00:08:09.350
<v Speaker 3>And then when you went to make a comparison, it

168
00:08:10.670 --> 00:08:13.110
<v Speaker 3>would then say, oh, well, I'm comparing this to a

169
00:08:13.129 --> 00:08:15.399
<v Speaker 3>particular number. So in this particular case, all right, now

170
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:20.029
<v Speaker 3>that we know what signed is, In comparison, the atomic

171
00:08:20.129 --> 00:08:24.689
<v Speaker 3>read function, nobody cares, operates and returns a signed integer.

172
00:08:25.029 --> 00:08:28.740
<v Speaker 3>So if you call IO pull cancel flag, doesn't matter,

173
00:08:29.250 --> 00:08:34.519
<v Speaker 3>the value becomes negative during the signed path. Okay, so

174
00:08:34.659 --> 00:08:39.059
<v Speaker 3>at some point, it's calling this IO cancel flag and

175
00:08:39.100 --> 00:08:41.639
<v Speaker 3>the last bit is set. So it assumes the number

176
00:08:41.700 --> 00:08:45.980
<v Speaker 3>is now negative. Well, in the world of comparisons, if

177
00:08:46.019 --> 00:08:50.950
<v Speaker 3>you do a true false... Anything negative is false. Anything

178
00:08:51.110 --> 00:08:56.389
<v Speaker 3>positive is true. So the number five is true. The

179
00:08:56.450 --> 00:09:00.929
<v Speaker 3>number negative 3000 is false, right? So it's that weird

180
00:09:01.049 --> 00:09:03.940
<v Speaker 3>place where you're using this variable in a way that

181
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:07.519
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't supposed to be used, right? In this particular case,

182
00:09:07.539 --> 00:09:09.539
<v Speaker 3>somebody figured out how I, how you could go from

183
00:09:09.559 --> 00:09:12.120
<v Speaker 3>a regular user and Carl was right here. You have

184
00:09:12.139 --> 00:09:13.519
<v Speaker 3>to be a regular user, but you can go from

185
00:09:13.570 --> 00:09:17.490
<v Speaker 3>a regular user to an administrative user on these versions

186
00:09:17.549 --> 00:09:17.809
<v Speaker 3>of Linux.

187
00:09:17.870 --> 00:09:18.110
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

188
00:09:18.409 --> 00:09:19.049
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's bad.

189
00:09:19.370 --> 00:09:19.909
<v Speaker 1>It's not good.

190
00:09:20.809 --> 00:09:23.509
<v Speaker 3>It's very similar. This reminds me very much of a

191
00:09:23.909 --> 00:09:27.679
<v Speaker 3>type confusion flaw. I haven't seen a lot of really

192
00:09:27.720 --> 00:09:31.279
<v Speaker 3>good type confusion flaws lately. But a type confusion flaw

193
00:09:31.580 --> 00:09:34.830
<v Speaker 3>is in languages that are not strongly typed.

194
00:09:36.139 --> 00:09:37.549
<v Speaker 1>Like JavaScript, for example.

195
00:09:37.850 --> 00:09:41.309
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great point, Carl, like JavaScript. And for those of you,

196
00:09:41.649 --> 00:09:43.649
<v Speaker 3>if you want to go a little bit into that, Carl,

197
00:09:43.690 --> 00:09:46.370
<v Speaker 3>like for our non-developers on the call.

198
00:09:46.429 --> 00:09:48.889
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so JavaScript makes it easy for you just to

199
00:09:48.929 --> 00:09:51.250
<v Speaker 1>pull variables out of thin air and say, you know,

200
00:09:51.429 --> 00:09:54.929
<v Speaker 1>X equals one, Y equals hello in quotes. And it

201
00:09:54.970 --> 00:09:57.470
<v Speaker 1>knows enough to, you know, treat the first one as

202
00:09:57.509 --> 00:09:59.009
<v Speaker 1>a number and the second one as a string.

203
00:09:59.029 --> 00:09:59.970
<v Speaker 3>Right.

204
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:05.700
<v Speaker 1>Then, you know, if you say Z equals 1.1, that's

205
00:10:05.740 --> 00:10:07.059
<v Speaker 1>different than X equals one.

206
00:10:07.240 --> 00:10:07.519
<v Speaker 5>Right.

207
00:10:07.539 --> 00:10:07.759
<v Speaker 4>Right.

208
00:10:07.879 --> 00:10:11.179
<v Speaker 1>So behind there, one is an integer. We don't know

209
00:10:11.220 --> 00:10:13.789
<v Speaker 1>if it's signed or if it's unsigned. And then the

210
00:10:13.850 --> 00:10:16.590
<v Speaker 1>other one, it's sort of a decimal or a numeric.

211
00:10:16.809 --> 00:10:17.009
<v Speaker 5>Right.

212
00:10:17.389 --> 00:10:17.529
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

213
00:10:18.289 --> 00:10:18.450
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

214
00:10:18.570 --> 00:10:21.269
<v Speaker 3>And, and then if you do some weird stuff like, uh,

215
00:10:21.309 --> 00:10:25.429
<v Speaker 3>you know, X equals one and Y equals hello, and

216
00:10:25.450 --> 00:10:25.909
<v Speaker 3>you do.

217
00:10:26.110 --> 00:10:28.409
<v Speaker 5>X plus Y, what happens?

218
00:10:28.850 --> 00:10:29.049
<v Speaker 4>Right.

219
00:10:29.210 --> 00:10:29.429
<v Speaker 5>Right.

220
00:10:30.149 --> 00:10:32.970
<v Speaker 3>So the computer goes, Oh, hello, must be, maybe it's

221
00:10:33.009 --> 00:10:36.129
<v Speaker 3>the ASCII numbers and maybe I should do whatever. So there's,

222
00:10:36.149 --> 00:10:39.049
<v Speaker 3>there's a place you get to where the developer, the

223
00:10:39.090 --> 00:10:41.529
<v Speaker 3>developer may not know what the heck happens when that

224
00:10:41.590 --> 00:10:45.570
<v Speaker 3>addition happens. So type confusion is an interesting style of attack. Well,

225
00:10:45.830 --> 00:10:46.970
<v Speaker 3>I haven't, like I said, I haven't seen one in

226
00:10:47.009 --> 00:10:49.149
<v Speaker 3>a while, but this, this feels very type confusion.

227
00:10:49.379 --> 00:10:49.659
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

228
00:10:49.720 --> 00:10:51.639
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to call a strike in on my

229
00:10:51.700 --> 00:10:54.940
<v Speaker 2>own position here, possibly, but I read something or, or

230
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>there was a story a years ago, I think it

231
00:10:57.100 --> 00:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>was before we started the podcast where they were talking

232
00:10:59.620 --> 00:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to Linus Torvald, who's the guy who started Linux.

233
00:11:02.570 --> 00:11:02.710
<v Speaker 4>Right.

234
00:11:02.879 --> 00:11:05.690
<v Speaker 2>And they pointed out that there were some problems with

235
00:11:05.750 --> 00:11:12.169
<v Speaker 2>the Linux kernel that were architectural and troubling. And he's like, no,

236
00:11:12.210 --> 00:11:14.870
<v Speaker 2>we're never going to revisit that. And, and it, you know,

237
00:11:15.629 --> 00:11:19.409
<v Speaker 2>fantastic developer, better developer than me. But when one guy

238
00:11:19.470 --> 00:11:22.379
<v Speaker 2>writes or one guy supervises the writing of an entire

239
00:11:22.460 --> 00:11:25.940
<v Speaker 2>operating system in his spare time, you got to wonder

240
00:11:25.980 --> 00:11:29.220
<v Speaker 2>where the, where the, the, the technical debt sits. And

241
00:11:29.240 --> 00:11:30.740
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of it might be in the

242
00:11:31.340 --> 00:11:33.879
<v Speaker 2>kernel of Linux based on these kinds of things. This

243
00:11:33.919 --> 00:11:37.259
<v Speaker 2>seems like a, It seems like a mistake that shouldn't

244
00:11:37.279 --> 00:11:39.159
<v Speaker 2>have been made in an operating system that's going to

245
00:11:39.179 --> 00:11:40.039
<v Speaker 2>be used for the enterprise.

246
00:11:40.259 --> 00:11:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you would think so.

247
00:11:41.019 --> 00:11:45.149
<v Speaker 1>If Linus Torvalds had AI, do you think that anybody

248
00:11:45.190 --> 00:11:46.809
<v Speaker 1>could have come up with that? Could we have a

249
00:11:47.090 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Carl X or Pat X or Dwayne X?

250
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Heck yeah. I'm going to create my own.

251
00:11:53.139 --> 00:11:55.419
<v Speaker 2>I do actually believe that's true, given that you start

252
00:11:55.440 --> 00:11:56.019
<v Speaker 2>with Unix.

253
00:11:56.279 --> 00:11:57.149
<v Speaker 1>Could we still do it?

254
00:11:57.320 --> 00:11:57.460
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

255
00:11:57.480 --> 00:12:00.129
<v Speaker 1>I mean, could I make not a version of Linux,

256
00:12:00.190 --> 00:12:02.190
<v Speaker 1>but a whole new Unix-based operating system?

257
00:12:02.230 --> 00:12:05.090
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you could make your own operating system absolutely right now.

258
00:12:05.169 --> 00:12:07.470
<v Speaker 2>You can also make your own Bitcoin. It's called Doge.

259
00:12:11.919 --> 00:12:12.740
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we moved on?

260
00:12:12.940 --> 00:12:13.409
<v Speaker 5>We've moved on.

261
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:13.700
<v Speaker 3>All right.

262
00:12:14.470 --> 00:12:20.870
<v Speaker 1>SonicWall patches two new actively exploited zero days in SMA

263
00:12:20.870 --> 00:12:21.769
<v Speaker 1>1000 VPNs.

264
00:12:22.250 --> 00:12:22.850
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no.

265
00:12:23.590 --> 00:12:24.169
<v Speaker 5>Zero days.

266
00:12:24.649 --> 00:12:26.159
<v Speaker 1>But it patched them, so that's good.

267
00:12:26.820 --> 00:12:27.259
<v Speaker 3>They did.

268
00:12:27.700 --> 00:12:27.899
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

269
00:12:28.659 --> 00:12:28.919
<v Speaker 5>I know.

270
00:12:28.940 --> 00:12:29.799
<v Speaker 4>Merry Christmas.

271
00:12:30.159 --> 00:12:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

272
00:12:30.539 --> 00:12:34.179
<v Speaker 3>So, SonicWall, these are... I love that band.

273
00:12:34.379 --> 00:12:34.820
<v Speaker 5>I know, right?

274
00:12:34.840 --> 00:12:35.220
<v Speaker 4>The kids?

275
00:12:35.539 --> 00:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they were great.

276
00:12:36.809 --> 00:12:38.809
<v Speaker 5>It's sonic wall okay.

277
00:12:38.570 --> 00:12:42.529
<v Speaker 3>Wonder wall anyways sonic wall patches two new um vulnerabilities

278
00:12:42.570 --> 00:12:45.580
<v Speaker 3>this is so sonic wall devices are generally targeted to

279
00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:48.580
<v Speaker 3>small to medium businesses um you don't generally you're not

280
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>going to see like apple running a whole bunch of

281
00:12:50.460 --> 00:12:53.659
<v Speaker 3>sonic walls you know at one of the 10 yeah

282
00:12:54.480 --> 00:12:56.580
<v Speaker 3>okay so this is a great point so this one

283
00:12:56.600 --> 00:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>was marked as a 10 and here at security this

284
00:12:59.139 --> 00:13:01.559
<v Speaker 3>week we always like to figure out is this really

285
00:13:01.580 --> 00:13:03.899
<v Speaker 3>a 10 or is this kind of a bs 10

286
00:13:03.899 --> 00:13:05.759
<v Speaker 3>and it's it should be considered a seven.

287
00:13:05.799 --> 00:13:08.570
<v Speaker 1>Well, we want the contagion score, which is how likely

288
00:13:08.889 --> 00:13:09.809
<v Speaker 1>are you to get it?

289
00:13:10.289 --> 00:13:12.250
<v Speaker 3>No, if you're running this version, you're already in trouble.

290
00:13:12.429 --> 00:13:12.909
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

291
00:13:12.950 --> 00:13:18.129
<v Speaker 3>Um, yeah, this is, this takes very little technical knowledge

292
00:13:18.149 --> 00:13:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to run. There's already a POC out on the internet

293
00:13:21.759 --> 00:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's not hard to find your patch. Yeah, it's patch.

294
00:13:25.620 --> 00:13:27.740
<v Speaker 3>You can absolutely go patch it. But if let's say

295
00:13:27.759 --> 00:13:30.419
<v Speaker 3>you're not like this is targeting small to medium business, right?

296
00:13:30.759 --> 00:13:34.980
<v Speaker 3>Most small to medium businesses, you're running a, a barbershop,

297
00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>you're not running around, you know, keeping up on security

298
00:13:38.539 --> 00:13:40.740
<v Speaker 3>news and patching your Sonic wall.

299
00:13:40.899 --> 00:13:41.139
<v Speaker 5>Right.

300
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:45.419
<v Speaker 3>So there's tons of these devices out there. Uh, although

301
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:47.779
<v Speaker 3>I guess what would you do as a barbershop VPNing

302
00:13:47.850 --> 00:13:51.570
<v Speaker 3>and back to the shop anyways? Um, so there's tons

303
00:13:51.610 --> 00:13:54.169
<v Speaker 3>of these devices out there that are unpatched right now.

304
00:13:54.529 --> 00:13:57.629
<v Speaker 3>The POC is out there. It is super easy to run. Um,

305
00:13:57.809 --> 00:14:00.700
<v Speaker 3>it is a form of SSRF, which is a server

306
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:02.159
<v Speaker 3>side request forgery attack.

307
00:14:02.320 --> 00:14:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

308
00:14:03.019 --> 00:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Um, So for those of you who haven't been familiar

309
00:14:07.259 --> 00:14:10.570
<v Speaker 3>with SSRF attacks, an SSRF attack is where I can

310
00:14:10.590 --> 00:14:12.970
<v Speaker 3>make a call out to a service, whether it's a

311
00:14:12.990 --> 00:14:16.029
<v Speaker 3>web server or in this case a VPN service. Most

312
00:14:16.070 --> 00:14:18.110
<v Speaker 3>of the SonicWall VPN services are a web server.

313
00:14:19.490 --> 00:14:19.789
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

314
00:14:20.129 --> 00:14:22.629
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter really because you go to a website,

315
00:14:22.649 --> 00:14:26.289
<v Speaker 3>you log in and it gives you access. But you

316
00:14:26.309 --> 00:14:28.210
<v Speaker 3>go out to a website and you make a request

317
00:14:28.269 --> 00:14:31.370
<v Speaker 3>and what happens is that server then makes a request

318
00:14:31.409 --> 00:14:34.460
<v Speaker 3>to itself on your behalf. So it looks like it's

319
00:14:34.519 --> 00:14:38.259
<v Speaker 3>coming from inside. And that's generally what an SSRF attack is,

320
00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:42.769
<v Speaker 3>is me conning the device into doing my bidding for

321
00:14:42.809 --> 00:14:45.639
<v Speaker 3>me on a backend channel so that it trusts it.

322
00:14:46.429 --> 00:14:46.990
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

323
00:14:47.090 --> 00:14:48.769
<v Speaker 3>So this one does not look good. And this is

324
00:14:48.809 --> 00:14:51.860
<v Speaker 3>pre-authenticated by the way. That's the other reason that this

325
00:14:52.000 --> 00:14:55.399
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a scary attack right now is you

326
00:14:55.460 --> 00:14:58.240
<v Speaker 3>don't need a username or password. Just find the sonic

327
00:14:58.259 --> 00:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>wall on the internet. run the proof of concept, you

328
00:15:00.940 --> 00:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>grab off a GitHub and boom, you have access.

329
00:15:03.870 --> 00:15:06.529
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, this seems like a good time and place

330
00:15:06.590 --> 00:15:08.309
<v Speaker 1>to take a break. So we'll be right back after

331
00:15:08.350 --> 00:15:15.070
<v Speaker 1>these very important messages. Don't you go away. So guys,

332
00:15:15.230 --> 00:15:17.470
<v Speaker 1>I went to the Humane Society the other day and

333
00:15:17.570 --> 00:15:21.929
<v Speaker 1>I got myself a Mirage Kitten. And the Mirage Kitten

334
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:24.059
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting kitten because you can see it

335
00:15:24.200 --> 00:15:26.820
<v Speaker 1>across the room, but as you get close, it just disappears.

336
00:15:26.840 --> 00:15:28.259
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

337
00:15:29.350 --> 00:15:30.289
<v Speaker 1>You can still hear it going.

338
00:15:30.509 --> 00:15:33.190
<v Speaker 4>All right.

339
00:15:33.769 --> 00:15:39.909
<v Speaker 1>The story is Iran-linked APT Mirage Kitten uses fake job

340
00:15:39.950 --> 00:15:44.750
<v Speaker 1>tests to spread malware. Malware.

341
00:15:46.129 --> 00:15:48.629
<v Speaker 2>These countries, North Korea and Iran are making the world,

342
00:15:49.169 --> 00:15:50.110
<v Speaker 2>they're ruining everything.

343
00:15:50.490 --> 00:15:50.769
<v Speaker 4>I know.

344
00:15:50.789 --> 00:15:52.549
<v Speaker 1>They've given us Mirage Kittens.

345
00:15:52.570 --> 00:15:53.629
<v Speaker 2>The Q-bomber all over again.

346
00:15:55.370 --> 00:15:57.740
<v Speaker 1>So this is a LinkedIn coding test, right?

347
00:15:58.320 --> 00:15:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely.

348
00:15:59.100 --> 00:16:03.299
<v Speaker 3>You apply for a job and you apply for a

349
00:16:03.340 --> 00:16:05.759
<v Speaker 3>job and they give you a co-test and they say, hey,

350
00:16:05.830 --> 00:16:10.549
<v Speaker 3>we need you to use, it's actually funny, this exact path, actually,

351
00:16:10.590 --> 00:16:13.529
<v Speaker 3>maybe they've been listening to Security This Week. This exact

352
00:16:13.610 --> 00:16:18.529
<v Speaker 3>path is a path that we presented probably six months ago.

353
00:16:18.990 --> 00:16:19.600
<v Speaker 5>Who's we?

354
00:16:20.509 --> 00:16:25.740
<v Speaker 3>We, as in we the security cabal, presented to one

355
00:16:25.759 --> 00:16:29.169
<v Speaker 3>of our customers as a viable path to break into

356
00:16:29.190 --> 00:16:31.690
<v Speaker 3>their organization we say listen we'll just hire one of

357
00:16:31.730 --> 00:16:35.659
<v Speaker 3>your developers who we see does side work and we'll

358
00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:38.019
<v Speaker 3>force them to use libraries not force them just say

359
00:16:38.059 --> 00:16:39.899
<v Speaker 3>hey we'd like you to use this library in this

360
00:16:39.919 --> 00:16:42.899
<v Speaker 3>library in this library and they'll be infected we're horrified

361
00:16:43.440 --> 00:16:47.399
<v Speaker 3>yeah and they were like wait what like that's so

362
00:16:47.419 --> 00:16:51.570
<v Speaker 3>we'll absolutely could do that and and apparently um iran's

363
00:16:51.629 --> 00:16:53.750
<v Speaker 3>like you know we like that that's a that's a

364
00:16:53.769 --> 00:16:55.490
<v Speaker 3>great path let's do that so that's what they're doing

365
00:16:56.029 --> 00:17:00.669
<v Speaker 3>post fake jobs force you to use libraries that you

366
00:17:00.710 --> 00:17:03.620
<v Speaker 3>don't possibly have time enough to read through, and when

367
00:17:03.659 --> 00:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>you make a call to it, it infects your local computer,

368
00:17:05.980 --> 00:17:10.140
<v Speaker 3>pulling information, info-stealing, blah, blah, blah.

369
00:17:10.759 --> 00:17:16.140
<v Speaker 1>What's the why for Iran-linked Mirage Kitten or whatever? What

370
00:17:16.180 --> 00:17:19.299
<v Speaker 1>is their goal? Do they just want to infect people randomly?

371
00:17:19.539 --> 00:17:23.509
<v Speaker 1>You said something like information-stealing, but what is it going

372
00:17:23.529 --> 00:17:28.869
<v Speaker 1>to get them if they get some out-of-school... coder wannabe

373
00:17:29.529 --> 00:17:30.630
<v Speaker 1>access to their computer.

374
00:17:30.650 --> 00:17:33.049
<v Speaker 2>Well, with Korea, it does it for the money. They

375
00:17:33.089 --> 00:17:36.410
<v Speaker 2>do it so that they can steal the money to

376
00:17:37.009 --> 00:17:37.609
<v Speaker 2>build missiles.

377
00:17:38.210 --> 00:17:38.950
<v Speaker 1>Like ransomware?

378
00:17:39.190 --> 00:17:43.190
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like ransomware, but in this case also, think about

379
00:17:43.309 --> 00:17:47.009
<v Speaker 3>the fact that you control the job posting. So if

380
00:17:47.130 --> 00:17:50.910
<v Speaker 3>I say, oh, I need a candidate that's TSSCI, right?

381
00:17:50.930 --> 00:17:56.230
<v Speaker 3>So top secret, secure compartmentalized information knowledge. They're certified to

382
00:17:56.269 --> 00:17:59.230
<v Speaker 3>deal with u.s secret government you know stuff.

383
00:17:59.250 --> 00:18:02.130
<v Speaker 2>Car job might be u.s secret government right.

384
00:18:02.450 --> 00:18:04.450
<v Speaker 3>So when they say oh you know we're a division

385
00:18:04.470 --> 00:18:06.980
<v Speaker 3>of the you know uh doj and we need blah

386
00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:09.200
<v Speaker 3>blah whatever and this is a you know we need

387
00:18:09.220 --> 00:18:10.859
<v Speaker 3>you to go through this test to see whether you're

388
00:18:11.019 --> 00:18:14.059
<v Speaker 3>you know smart enough to develop whatever now when i

389
00:18:14.079 --> 00:18:16.900
<v Speaker 3>get on your computer there's probably i mean yeah i

390
00:18:16.920 --> 00:18:19.569
<v Speaker 3>mean if you're following all the regs with tssci and

391
00:18:19.630 --> 00:18:21.450
<v Speaker 3>zipper and nipper and all that good stuff you shouldn't

392
00:18:21.509 --> 00:18:23.990
<v Speaker 3>have anything secure on your network on your your computer

393
00:18:24.049 --> 00:18:28.339
<v Speaker 3>but chances are they might garner access or information that'll

394
00:18:28.359 --> 00:18:31.900
<v Speaker 3>help them. So I would guess that's a RANDS target,

395
00:18:32.599 --> 00:18:35.420
<v Speaker 3>the Mirage Kitten, is let's see what type of sensitive

396
00:18:35.579 --> 00:18:38.799
<v Speaker 3>things we can pull from people and then just gain

397
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:41.619
<v Speaker 3>and continue access, maintain access to those devices.

398
00:18:41.960 --> 00:18:45.700
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Is there anything that we can do to protect

399
00:18:45.759 --> 00:18:49.559
<v Speaker 1>ourselves except for don't answer stupid emails and click on

400
00:18:49.619 --> 00:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>links or anything?

401
00:18:51.380 --> 00:18:52.259
<v Speaker 5>This is a tough one.

402
00:18:53.119 --> 00:18:56.220
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the reasons we proposed this to

403
00:18:56.279 --> 00:18:58.990
<v Speaker 3>attack our customer because it's like I could spin up

404
00:18:59.029 --> 00:19:02.349
<v Speaker 3>a real company with a real name, with a real

405
00:19:02.349 --> 00:19:05.549
<v Speaker 3>800 number, with real people on LinkedIn, and it could

406
00:19:05.950 --> 00:19:08.789
<v Speaker 3>literally look like a normal job posting.

407
00:19:09.089 --> 00:19:11.970
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about this then. If you were somebody

408
00:19:12.009 --> 00:19:14.940
<v Speaker 2>who really wanted to apply for this job, you checked

409
00:19:14.980 --> 00:19:17.180
<v Speaker 2>out the company and they came back legit because they

410
00:19:17.200 --> 00:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>did all the things and they're a nation state. The

411
00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:21.869
<v Speaker 2>way I would approach it if you decide you're going

412
00:19:21.880 --> 00:19:24.190
<v Speaker 2>to have to do this is you set up a

413
00:19:24.349 --> 00:19:29.970
<v Speaker 2>segregated VM. You download the things there. You run it

414
00:19:30.009 --> 00:19:33.789
<v Speaker 2>with separate accounts on that VM. You get AI to

415
00:19:33.869 --> 00:19:37.029
<v Speaker 2>look at all the libraries ahead of time to see

416
00:19:37.089 --> 00:19:40.170
<v Speaker 2>if there's anything untoward in them because it can look

417
00:19:40.190 --> 00:19:42.410
<v Speaker 2>through all the code even if you can't. And you

418
00:19:42.569 --> 00:19:46.430
<v Speaker 2>do that test on a throwaway VM. That's the problem

419
00:19:46.529 --> 00:19:48.460
<v Speaker 2>is it's a lot of work. it's not easy.

420
00:19:48.539 --> 00:19:48.740
<v Speaker 4>Right.

421
00:19:48.809 --> 00:19:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, that's an interesting point though, Patrick, like

422
00:19:51.819 --> 00:19:55.039
<v Speaker 3>in nowadays with AI, it could be, I spin up

423
00:19:55.119 --> 00:19:57.180
<v Speaker 3>a VM, I have a trash VM, whatever, but I

424
00:19:57.279 --> 00:20:01.029
<v Speaker 3>also could have cursor read through the library and be like, Hey,

425
00:20:01.089 --> 00:20:02.789
<v Speaker 3>give me an, give me an initial understanding of what

426
00:20:02.809 --> 00:20:04.769
<v Speaker 3>this thing does. If it, if they're giving us the

427
00:20:04.789 --> 00:20:06.809
<v Speaker 3>code now, if they're giving us just a DLL that

428
00:20:06.849 --> 00:20:10.019
<v Speaker 3>we call entry points on, I don't know, me personally,

429
00:20:10.039 --> 00:20:12.279
<v Speaker 3>I'd reverse engineer the DLL and strip it apart. But

430
00:20:12.720 --> 00:20:14.740
<v Speaker 3>normal humans might be, okay, I'm going to do this

431
00:20:14.799 --> 00:20:22.190
<v Speaker 3>on a throwaway VM. You don't have the mythos.

432
00:20:22.349 --> 00:20:24.710
<v Speaker 2>But still, even if you did it just in a

433
00:20:24.769 --> 00:20:30.250
<v Speaker 2>segregated environment, I mean, hell, rent a VM on a

434
00:20:30.269 --> 00:20:32.990
<v Speaker 2>hosting provider for a month and use it there and

435
00:20:33.029 --> 00:20:35.549
<v Speaker 2>then throw it away. The problem is cost and time.

436
00:20:37.430 --> 00:20:40.930
<v Speaker 2>And right now the job market is so obscene. There

437
00:20:41.079 --> 00:20:44.500
<v Speaker 2>are companies that are listing jobs that don't exist because

438
00:20:44.519 --> 00:20:48.039
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to hype up their company as a growing company.

439
00:20:48.680 --> 00:20:52.740
<v Speaker 2>There's AI that's a friend of ours, Ted Newart, had

440
00:20:52.759 --> 00:20:56.250
<v Speaker 2>a post where somebody he knew, I think it was

441
00:20:56.269 --> 00:21:00.250
<v Speaker 2>somebody he reposted, was a hiring manager and they couldn't

442
00:21:00.269 --> 00:21:04.269
<v Speaker 2>understand why HR just said no qualified applicants and he

443
00:21:04.309 --> 00:21:07.380
<v Speaker 2>needed somebody for his team. So he took his resume,

444
00:21:07.460 --> 00:21:10.539
<v Speaker 2>changed the names and the dates, submitted it, and within

445
00:21:10.619 --> 00:21:13.799
<v Speaker 2>six minutes, the company's AI rejected him as a candidate

446
00:21:13.819 --> 00:21:17.140
<v Speaker 2>for a job he was fully qualified for. Wow. Because

447
00:21:17.619 --> 00:21:22.180
<v Speaker 2>it was looking for React.js with a certain capitalization and punctuation.

448
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:26.369
<v Speaker 2>It just said React. It said, oh, you don't have

449
00:21:26.390 --> 00:21:27.990
<v Speaker 2>the right technologies and threw you away.

450
00:21:28.329 --> 00:21:28.549
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

451
00:21:28.930 --> 00:21:32.029
<v Speaker 2>So we're just in such an idiocracy in terms of

452
00:21:32.069 --> 00:21:34.849
<v Speaker 2>the job space. I can see people being desperate to

453
00:21:34.910 --> 00:21:37.809
<v Speaker 2>find something if they've left the job and doing this

454
00:21:37.849 --> 00:21:39.930
<v Speaker 2>right away. But it's a trap.

455
00:21:40.250 --> 00:21:44.589
<v Speaker 1>Be careful. All right, we moved on. Hackers push malicious

456
00:21:44.730 --> 00:21:49.930
<v Speaker 1>virtualizer update in BGP hijacking attack. What's BGP?

457
00:21:51.740 --> 00:21:56.079
<v Speaker 3>BGP, big, great. You know, I can't even come up

458
00:21:56.119 --> 00:22:00.039
<v Speaker 3>with a real funny thing. Yeah, exactly.

459
00:22:00.059 --> 00:22:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Football has been around forever.

460
00:22:02.769 --> 00:22:06.789
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. So a border gateway protocol is how the

461
00:22:07.029 --> 00:22:09.529
<v Speaker 3>whole internet works, right?

462
00:22:09.690 --> 00:22:10.529
<v Speaker 1>You're making this up.

463
00:22:10.710 --> 00:22:14.650
<v Speaker 3>Um, so let's assume, no, seriously, if like, yeah, it's

464
00:22:14.710 --> 00:22:17.329
<v Speaker 3>that magic thing that nobody understands, but that's how all

465
00:22:17.369 --> 00:22:21.230
<v Speaker 3>my bits get to your bits. Um, so imagine, um,

466
00:22:21.309 --> 00:22:23.170
<v Speaker 3>you want to go to an IP address. So, okay,

467
00:22:23.190 --> 00:22:25.859
<v Speaker 3>let's say, let's imagine you want to go to Google's

468
00:22:25.910 --> 00:22:31.529
<v Speaker 3>DNS to talk to it. Um, Google's DNS is is 8.8.8.8.

469
00:22:31.529 --> 00:22:35.160
<v Speaker 3>The reason I use that one is super simple. So

470
00:22:35.380 --> 00:22:38.299
<v Speaker 3>my computer is going to try and reach out to 8.8.8

471
00:22:38.299 --> 00:22:42.819
<v Speaker 3>on my local network. Obviously, it's not here. So it's

472
00:22:42.839 --> 00:22:46.640
<v Speaker 3>going to go to the router and or gateway and say, hey,

473
00:22:46.880 --> 00:22:50.490
<v Speaker 3>I need 8.8.8.8. My router and gateway is then going

474
00:22:50.509 --> 00:22:53.470
<v Speaker 3>to upstream it to my ISP and say, hey, do

475
00:22:53.490 --> 00:22:58.930
<v Speaker 3>you know where 8.8.8.8 is? And my ISP for me

476
00:22:58.990 --> 00:23:03.410
<v Speaker 3>here is Fidium. It then is going to use BGP

477
00:23:03.549 --> 00:23:06.819
<v Speaker 3>to say who is announcing that they own that range.

478
00:23:07.380 --> 00:23:07.940
<v Speaker 4>Oh, okay.

479
00:23:08.059 --> 00:23:10.579
<v Speaker 3>And that's going to come back to, oh, it's Google

480
00:23:10.759 --> 00:23:14.309
<v Speaker 3>owns that range or it's, you know, whatever. It's usually

481
00:23:14.329 --> 00:23:15.009
<v Speaker 3>a major provider.

482
00:23:15.049 --> 00:23:17.650
<v Speaker 5>It's not like. you know, Pulsar security owns that range.

483
00:23:17.730 --> 00:23:19.849
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of like DNS for IP addresses.

484
00:23:20.390 --> 00:23:21.690
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. That's a great analogy.

485
00:23:21.710 --> 00:23:22.890
<v Speaker 1>It's like a phone book.

486
00:23:22.910 --> 00:23:23.069
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

487
00:23:23.109 --> 00:23:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. And it's interesting because DNS ultimately comes down

488
00:23:28.259 --> 00:23:31.319
<v Speaker 3>to IP and then IP then comes down to BGP.

489
00:23:31.339 --> 00:23:33.819
<v Speaker 3>So BGP, when I say it's how the internet works,

490
00:23:33.880 --> 00:23:36.880
<v Speaker 3>it's literally how the internet works, not how a network works,

491
00:23:36.920 --> 00:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>but how the internet works.

492
00:23:38.039 --> 00:23:38.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that makes sense.

493
00:23:39.940 --> 00:23:44.089
<v Speaker 3>So they don't go into, so if I can hijack,

494
00:23:44.859 --> 00:23:50.700
<v Speaker 3>a particular broadcast, I can say, oh, I am 8.0.0.0 slash,

495
00:23:51.039 --> 00:23:56.579
<v Speaker 3>you know, whatever. Then I own that IP and anybody

496
00:23:56.599 --> 00:23:58.029
<v Speaker 3>who goes there is going to come to me.

497
00:23:58.589 --> 00:24:01.490
<v Speaker 1>So this is dangerous because it's so fundamental. It's so

498
00:24:01.569 --> 00:24:02.170
<v Speaker 1>low level.

499
00:24:02.269 --> 00:24:02.549
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

500
00:24:02.569 --> 00:24:04.670
<v Speaker 2>It's like controlling the phone company switching.

501
00:24:04.869 --> 00:24:05.609
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

502
00:24:06.069 --> 00:24:08.670
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me put it another way. I mean, most

503
00:24:08.769 --> 00:24:15.329
<v Speaker 1>brainwashing happens when somebody is told and eventually believes that

504
00:24:15.420 --> 00:24:19.069
<v Speaker 1>some fundamental fact that all of your other facts are

505
00:24:19.210 --> 00:24:23.930
<v Speaker 1>stacked upon, something at the lowest level was true and

506
00:24:23.970 --> 00:24:27.630
<v Speaker 1>now it's false. The sky is green and the grass

507
00:24:27.690 --> 00:24:28.460
<v Speaker 1>is blue, right?

508
00:24:29.160 --> 00:24:31.059
<v Speaker 2>And Picard said, there are two lights.

509
00:24:31.140 --> 00:24:32.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, three lights.

510
00:24:32.140 --> 00:24:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Or three lights.

511
00:24:34.799 --> 00:24:41.279
<v Speaker 1>There are three lights. Yeah, exactly. Some fundamental... belief is

512
00:24:41.480 --> 00:24:44.559
<v Speaker 1>twisted and then your whole house of cards comes crumbling

513
00:24:44.599 --> 00:24:47.829
<v Speaker 1>down and that's exactly what i see here because it's

514
00:24:47.869 --> 00:24:50.829
<v Speaker 1>so low level that it affects everything.

515
00:24:50.569 --> 00:24:56.190
<v Speaker 3>Upstream yeah exactly um so in this particular case uh

516
00:24:56.210 --> 00:24:58.150
<v Speaker 3>so i don't get that thing wrong an urgent notice

517
00:24:58.190 --> 00:25:00.700
<v Speaker 3>from the vendor of all utc around august 30th an

518
00:25:00.759 --> 00:25:07.579
<v Speaker 3>attacker routed a block of hetzner hosted IP addresses in

519
00:25:07.740 --> 00:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a BGP hijacking attack. What they in essence were doing

520
00:25:13.029 --> 00:25:16.950
<v Speaker 3>was they were saying, we are this range. And then

521
00:25:16.990 --> 00:25:20.529
<v Speaker 3>a certain number of people believed it and started coming

522
00:25:20.569 --> 00:25:26.779
<v Speaker 3>to them for updates. They were attacking, um, this virtualizer software, um,

523
00:25:26.809 --> 00:25:30.490
<v Speaker 3>which is a control panel for virtual private servers for, uh,

524
00:25:30.529 --> 00:25:38.130
<v Speaker 3>VPCs on the internet. Um, by a company called soft delicious, soft, soft, cool.

525
00:25:38.170 --> 00:25:40.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Cause I don't know. So it looks like soft delicious,

526
00:25:40.839 --> 00:25:41.839
<v Speaker 5>which sounds weird. It does.

527
00:25:41.920 --> 00:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Soft, soft, a coolest, soft.

528
00:25:44.339 --> 00:25:45.880
<v Speaker 5>Soft, a coolest.

529
00:25:46.519 --> 00:25:46.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

530
00:25:46.799 --> 00:25:47.220
<v Speaker 5>Anyways.

531
00:25:47.819 --> 00:25:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Um, so what would happen is now legitimate requests for

532
00:25:51.519 --> 00:25:54.410
<v Speaker 3>updates for this panel would actually go to the attackers

533
00:25:55.250 --> 00:25:57.769
<v Speaker 3>instead of actually going into the legitimate backend source. And

534
00:25:57.789 --> 00:25:59.410
<v Speaker 3>it would be hard for you as a, just a

535
00:25:59.450 --> 00:26:04.920
<v Speaker 3>normal human updating your software to see the problem. because

536
00:26:05.220 --> 00:26:07.079
<v Speaker 3>you don't have control over it. You're just routing where

537
00:26:07.119 --> 00:26:09.119
<v Speaker 3>the internet's telling you to route. What I will tell

538
00:26:09.140 --> 00:26:12.930
<v Speaker 3>you though, is if a software update does like, okay,

539
00:26:12.950 --> 00:26:17.470
<v Speaker 3>how do I protect myself? A software update designed properly

540
00:26:18.930 --> 00:26:22.630
<v Speaker 3>from the software vendor would actually have probably signed the

541
00:26:22.789 --> 00:26:26.259
<v Speaker 3>update with their own key. And when it makes it

542
00:26:26.299 --> 00:26:29.519
<v Speaker 3>down to the software, it then checks the signature before

543
00:26:29.539 --> 00:26:32.059
<v Speaker 3>it applies it. So my guess is, as we dig

544
00:26:32.099 --> 00:26:36.029
<v Speaker 3>deeper here into this article, there wasn't, they didn't actually

545
00:26:36.089 --> 00:26:38.359
<v Speaker 3>properly sign this, those updates.

546
00:26:39.200 --> 00:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Human error.

547
00:26:40.039 --> 00:26:42.140
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's interesting. I mean, secure, we talk about

548
00:26:42.220 --> 00:26:44.319
<v Speaker 3>all the, hey, you should do this and you should

549
00:26:44.339 --> 00:26:48.119
<v Speaker 3>do that and blah, blah, blah. But somebody hacks your BGP.

550
00:26:48.140 --> 00:26:50.549
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there isn't much you can.

551
00:26:50.460 --> 00:26:51.190
<v Speaker 5>Do other than.

552
00:26:52.470 --> 00:26:55.569
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even lower. Hope the vendor does something right.

553
00:26:56.250 --> 00:27:02.890
<v Speaker 1>Okay, extortion group, fulcrum sec. claims 86 gigabyte manchester airports

554
00:27:03.190 --> 00:27:05.549
<v Speaker 1>group data theft too.

555
00:27:05.450 --> 00:27:09.430
<v Speaker 3>Close to home is it no not that manchester actually

556
00:27:09.450 --> 00:27:12.339
<v Speaker 3>i got this one from cliff um yeah i think

557
00:27:12.410 --> 00:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>one of one of probably two guests we've ever had

558
00:27:15.299 --> 00:27:18.960
<v Speaker 3>on this show but um yes that's right yeah uh

559
00:27:19.039 --> 00:27:21.920
<v Speaker 3>so cliff posted this in the discord actually uh this

560
00:27:21.980 --> 00:27:23.500
<v Speaker 3>is probably a good point for me to bring up

561
00:27:23.880 --> 00:27:26.380
<v Speaker 3>uh the discord now also has although we have we've

562
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:28.099
<v Speaker 3>been getting a ton of new users which is awesome

563
00:27:28.859 --> 00:27:32.500
<v Speaker 3>I've also added a cyber AI channel because we've been

564
00:27:32.519 --> 00:27:35.099
<v Speaker 3>talking a lot more about cyber and AI. I figure

565
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:38.319
<v Speaker 3>there's probably a good place for us to put some

566
00:27:38.420 --> 00:27:39.079
<v Speaker 3>stuff down there.

567
00:27:39.279 --> 00:27:40.619
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

568
00:27:41.289 --> 00:27:44.470
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Cliff hit me up at 2 this morning

569
00:27:44.549 --> 00:27:47.490
<v Speaker 3>and was like, hey, have you seen this? And I

570
00:27:47.529 --> 00:27:52.509
<v Speaker 3>started reading through it. It is an interesting attack. These guys,

571
00:27:53.210 --> 00:27:58.289
<v Speaker 3>the Fulcrum Sec group, they've been hitting some pretty big

572
00:27:58.349 --> 00:28:02.049
<v Speaker 3>targets and they're, they've made a name for themselves as

573
00:28:02.150 --> 00:28:06.750
<v Speaker 3>the no BS attackers. Like if they call you up

574
00:28:06.789 --> 00:28:08.069
<v Speaker 3>and say, Hey, we have a hundred.

575
00:28:07.910 --> 00:28:10.359
<v Speaker 5>Gig of your data. They have a hundred gig of

576
00:28:10.380 --> 00:28:10.759
<v Speaker 5>your data.

577
00:28:11.539 --> 00:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Believe them.

578
00:28:12.400 --> 00:28:12.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

579
00:28:12.680 --> 00:28:13.099
<v Speaker 5>Believe them.

580
00:28:14.079 --> 00:28:17.539
<v Speaker 3>So bleeping computer actually reached out to them when Manchester

581
00:28:17.960 --> 00:28:22.890
<v Speaker 3>airport group disclosed this breach and was like, all right,

582
00:28:22.930 --> 00:28:25.640
<v Speaker 3>show us some of it. And sure enough, they showed

583
00:28:25.680 --> 00:28:29.240
<v Speaker 3>them some of the information they have. And what's interesting

584
00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:33.980
<v Speaker 3>here is the spin. The Manchester airport group mag is like, Oh, listen,

585
00:28:34.460 --> 00:28:36.220
<v Speaker 3>no credit card data was bleep bleep.

586
00:28:36.680 --> 00:28:37.220
<v Speaker 5>So you're good.

587
00:28:37.440 --> 00:28:38.220
<v Speaker 3>Like everything's great.

588
00:28:38.839 --> 00:28:39.079
<v Speaker 5>Right.

589
00:28:39.960 --> 00:28:41.339
<v Speaker 3>But if you take a look at the data that

590
00:28:41.519 --> 00:28:43.660
<v Speaker 3>was actually.

591
00:28:43.380 --> 00:28:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Leaked or wifi registrations, fast track bookings, license plates for

592
00:28:50.859 --> 00:28:56.150
<v Speaker 1>your car, vehicle registrations, your zip code and in the

593
00:28:56.309 --> 00:28:58.829
<v Speaker 1>UK that brings, there's like, it brings you down to

594
00:28:58.869 --> 00:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like 12 different homes, your booking reservations. So they know

595
00:29:02.680 --> 00:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're going to be out of the house and

596
00:29:03.980 --> 00:29:05.819
<v Speaker 1>they know when you're going to be out of the country.

597
00:29:06.440 --> 00:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's much more devastating than credit cards, like whatever

598
00:29:10.819 --> 00:29:12.380
<v Speaker 1>credit cards you can just rotate.

599
00:29:12.539 --> 00:29:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

600
00:29:12.779 --> 00:29:12.940
<v Speaker 5>Right.

601
00:29:12.980 --> 00:29:15.259
<v Speaker 3>I can just call up and get a new one. But, uh,

602
00:29:15.339 --> 00:29:17.680
<v Speaker 3>this stuff, you just can't go get a new license

603
00:29:17.740 --> 00:29:18.500
<v Speaker 3>plate easily.

604
00:29:18.519 --> 00:29:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Right.

605
00:29:19.759 --> 00:29:23.519
<v Speaker 3>Uh, or rotate your phone number easily. So, um, This

606
00:29:23.779 --> 00:29:28.039
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a big deal. So, okay, you go, okay, well,

607
00:29:28.160 --> 00:29:31.619
<v Speaker 3>the breach happened. They were notified. They don't look like

608
00:29:31.640 --> 00:29:35.130
<v Speaker 3>they're going to pay the crew. So, my guess is

609
00:29:35.130 --> 00:29:36.630
<v Speaker 3>86 gig worth of data is going to get leaked.

610
00:29:37.210 --> 00:29:38.069
<v Speaker 3>How did it happen?

611
00:29:38.170 --> 00:29:38.509
<v Speaker 5>What type of?

612
00:29:40.700 --> 00:29:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Amazing zero-day attack got them there?

613
00:29:44.380 --> 00:29:46.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, by the way you're talking, I think it's

614
00:29:46.640 --> 00:29:50.650
<v Speaker 1>going to be relatively simple. Like somebody got called up

615
00:29:50.710 --> 00:29:52.089
<v Speaker 1>and asked for it or something.

616
00:29:52.109 --> 00:29:55.269
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Carl, if you had a super... I'm just asking

617
00:29:55.289 --> 00:29:59.589
<v Speaker 3>you as a professional developer. If you had a super secret...

618
00:29:59.779 --> 00:30:05.349
<v Speaker 3>api key yeah where's the one place you probably wouldn't

619
00:30:05.529 --> 00:30:10.609
<v Speaker 3>put said super secret api key in code in.

620
00:30:10.569 --> 00:30:12.289
<v Speaker 2>Code the home page.

621
00:30:13.710 --> 00:30:18.059
<v Speaker 1>Yeah i wouldn't hard code it into a github repo

622
00:30:18.119 --> 00:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>or something.

623
00:30:19.000 --> 00:30:23.019
<v Speaker 3>Would you would you put it in javascript no because

624
00:30:23.059 --> 00:30:28.369
<v Speaker 3>that's secure it's not secure of course not That's what

625
00:30:28.410 --> 00:30:31.930
<v Speaker 3>they did. They took this super secret backend API credential

626
00:30:32.150 --> 00:30:34.079
<v Speaker 3>and they put it in JavaScript and they said, I'm

627
00:30:34.140 --> 00:30:36.940
<v Speaker 3>sure the client browser won't tell the user what it is.

628
00:30:37.660 --> 00:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my God.

629
00:30:38.640 --> 00:30:40.859
<v Speaker 3>And that was it. That was the whole hack. They

630
00:30:40.880 --> 00:30:43.140
<v Speaker 3>looked at it and went, wow, there's a key coming

631
00:30:43.180 --> 00:30:45.740
<v Speaker 3>to my page, to my browser. I'm just going to

632
00:30:45.920 --> 00:30:46.569
<v Speaker 3>call the API.

633
00:30:46.809 --> 00:30:47.609
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that just looking?

634
00:30:48.150 --> 00:30:54.289
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. Uh, so I'm not saying this crew is

635
00:30:54.849 --> 00:30:58.230
<v Speaker 3>not talented. I'm sure they're talented in breaking into places

636
00:30:58.250 --> 00:31:00.940
<v Speaker 3>and there's tons of breaches that have been attributed to them.

637
00:31:01.019 --> 00:31:05.259
<v Speaker 3>But in this particular case, the, the Manchester airport group

638
00:31:05.380 --> 00:31:12.450
<v Speaker 3>actually put a API key that had admin level credential access,

639
00:31:12.990 --> 00:31:16.750
<v Speaker 3>you know, level access to everything, um, in JavaScript.

640
00:31:17.329 --> 00:31:17.549
<v Speaker 5>Right.

641
00:31:17.950 --> 00:31:21.049
<v Speaker 3>Um, Because they were like, well, this key has to

642
00:31:21.089 --> 00:31:24.089
<v Speaker 3>be able to look up whether there's a spot available

643
00:31:24.109 --> 00:31:26.490
<v Speaker 3>in the garage and what your license tag would be

644
00:31:26.589 --> 00:31:28.829
<v Speaker 3>and what your reservations are so we can know whether,

645
00:31:28.849 --> 00:31:30.410
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean? So it's, they're like, well,

646
00:31:30.430 --> 00:31:32.750
<v Speaker 3>let's just give this key access to everything. And they

647
00:31:32.769 --> 00:31:35.049
<v Speaker 3>did that and then gave it to every user who

648
00:31:35.170 --> 00:31:36.210
<v Speaker 3>ever browsed the website.

649
00:31:36.250 --> 00:31:39.410
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine that this decision was influenced by tequila.

650
00:31:41.170 --> 00:31:43.170
<v Speaker 1>No i think we're in the wrong business i think

651
00:31:43.609 --> 00:31:45.769
<v Speaker 1>i think i'm going to be the next next jeff

652
00:31:45.829 --> 00:31:49.009
<v Speaker 1>foxworthy you know you might be a redneck if but

653
00:31:49.069 --> 00:31:51.490
<v Speaker 1>my routine's going to be you might be an idiot

654
00:31:51.549 --> 00:31:56.809
<v Speaker 1>coder if you're anybody can break into your system by

655
00:31:56.990 --> 00:31:59.529
<v Speaker 1>view source right right.

656
00:31:59.329 --> 00:32:04.769
<v Speaker 4>Exactly i think we once bought a a website that

657
00:32:05.329 --> 00:32:08.059
<v Speaker 4>that should have known better that had pictures of people

658
00:32:08.730 --> 00:32:11.839
<v Speaker 4>and the The label on the picture was the social

659
00:32:11.880 --> 00:32:13.099
<v Speaker 4>security number.

660
00:32:13.240 --> 00:32:13.660
<v Speaker 1>Oh, God.

661
00:32:14.019 --> 00:32:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

662
00:32:14.519 --> 00:32:16.599
<v Speaker 5>We're like, come on.

663
00:32:17.740 --> 00:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>What could happen?

664
00:32:18.420 --> 00:32:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yes.

665
00:32:19.539 --> 00:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

666
00:32:21.460 --> 00:32:21.720
<v Speaker 5>All right.

667
00:32:21.940 --> 00:32:26.900
<v Speaker 1>And that brings us to our top story. OpenAI Astra

668
00:32:27.569 --> 00:32:34.470
<v Speaker 1>brings autonomous zero-day exploitation to AI. So, if this is

669
00:32:34.529 --> 00:32:39.609
<v Speaker 1>what I think it means, that means this Astra is using...

670
00:32:40.539 --> 00:32:44.380
<v Speaker 1>It is an AI model that can just completely devastate

671
00:32:44.400 --> 00:32:44.819
<v Speaker 1>the world.

672
00:32:45.119 --> 00:32:49.079
<v Speaker 2>It's open AI saying, we have a mythos too. That's

673
00:32:49.940 --> 00:32:53.289
<v Speaker 2>my take on it. We pass the cyber bench. And

674
00:32:53.329 --> 00:32:55.930
<v Speaker 2>by the way, most people are starting to come around

675
00:32:55.950 --> 00:32:59.769
<v Speaker 2>to the fact that these benchmarks are tests that the

676
00:32:59.890 --> 00:33:06.289
<v Speaker 2>AI study too. So the question then becomes... Is OpenAI

677
00:33:06.410 --> 00:33:10.369
<v Speaker 2>trying to just get regulated so that it's an advertising stunt?

678
00:33:10.849 --> 00:33:14.170
<v Speaker 2>So they'll have their fable mythos moment, their glass wing moment?

679
00:33:14.779 --> 00:33:17.460
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's inevitable that we're going to see

680
00:33:17.619 --> 00:33:20.019
<v Speaker 2>models who get better and better at cyber.

681
00:33:21.400 --> 00:33:21.619
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

682
00:33:21.680 --> 00:33:24.500
<v Speaker 2>But just the fact that it's passed a bench test,

683
00:33:25.160 --> 00:33:28.539
<v Speaker 2>there's a motivation now for them to say they have

684
00:33:28.559 --> 00:33:31.500
<v Speaker 2>their me too moment as far as mythos goes. What

685
00:33:31.519 --> 00:33:32.700
<v Speaker 2>do you think? Yeah.

686
00:33:32.859 --> 00:33:35.869
<v Speaker 1>So let me just explain what it is. So this

687
00:33:36.670 --> 00:33:40.650
<v Speaker 1>Astra can, according to OpenAI, autonomously find zero days and

688
00:33:40.730 --> 00:33:43.470
<v Speaker 1>build exploits. So that's the key. How is that?

689
00:33:43.529 --> 00:33:43.710
<v Speaker 5>Right.

690
00:33:44.210 --> 00:33:45.740
<v Speaker 2>We've been talking about it for six months.

691
00:33:45.900 --> 00:33:46.079
<v Speaker 4>Right.

692
00:33:46.099 --> 00:33:50.460
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny. Before the show started, I was like, oh,

693
00:33:50.500 --> 00:33:52.799
<v Speaker 3>that's cute. I mean, we've had it for nine months now,

694
00:33:52.960 --> 00:33:57.490
<v Speaker 3>but that's adorable. Like, I'm glad OpenAI caught up. I mean, and,

695
00:33:57.589 --> 00:33:59.789
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's funny. I was like, we just, we

696
00:33:59.809 --> 00:34:04.299
<v Speaker 3>don't submit our AIs and harnesses to you know, get

697
00:34:04.460 --> 00:34:07.789
<v Speaker 3>awards and blue ribbons. In this case, this is the

698
00:34:07.880 --> 00:34:16.829
<v Speaker 3>first to reach this cyber classification of critical designation, which, whatever. Like, listen,

699
00:34:17.409 --> 00:34:19.780
<v Speaker 3>and we've talked about this, the harness matters just about

700
00:34:19.820 --> 00:34:22.960
<v Speaker 3>as much as the model itself. And there are plenty

701
00:34:23.059 --> 00:34:26.059
<v Speaker 3>of harnesses out there at this point that can go

702
00:34:26.480 --> 00:34:29.579
<v Speaker 3>full attack. You point it at a target. It pulls

703
00:34:29.619 --> 00:34:32.579
<v Speaker 3>down software. It creates zero days. It tests them in

704
00:34:32.599 --> 00:34:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the virtualized environment. They create and then it'll go out

705
00:34:35.900 --> 00:34:39.139
<v Speaker 3>and attack it. We've seen this. We've seen these entire frameworks.

706
00:34:39.380 --> 00:34:39.579
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

707
00:34:39.639 --> 00:34:42.760
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that OpenAI is announcing Astra is amazing.

708
00:34:42.780 --> 00:34:45.590
<v Speaker 3>I agree with Patrick. This is all just marketing ploy.

709
00:34:45.769 --> 00:34:50.050
<v Speaker 2>The model 5% of what it takes to use these

710
00:34:50.369 --> 00:34:51.769
<v Speaker 2>AI systems. The harness is 95%.

711
00:34:51.769 --> 00:34:52.289
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree.

712
00:34:54.010 --> 00:34:54.969
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the harness matters.

713
00:34:54.989 --> 00:34:58.150
<v Speaker 2>You can take a weak model and do incredible damage

714
00:34:58.170 --> 00:34:58.989
<v Speaker 2>with the right harness.

715
00:34:59.269 --> 00:34:59.409
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

716
00:34:59.469 --> 00:35:01.869
<v Speaker 2>And you can take the best model and not be

717
00:35:01.909 --> 00:35:02.769
<v Speaker 2>able to find anything.

718
00:35:03.010 --> 00:35:03.809
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, right.

719
00:35:03.969 --> 00:35:04.949
<v Speaker 2>If you don't have the right harness.

720
00:35:05.530 --> 00:35:08.639
<v Speaker 1>And for those who've never heard that term, harness, the

721
00:35:08.679 --> 00:35:12.039
<v Speaker 1>harness is like your cloud code app or your GitHub

722
00:35:12.139 --> 00:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>co-pilot CLI.

723
00:35:13.519 --> 00:35:15.260
<v Speaker 2>It's the judgment.

724
00:35:15.440 --> 00:35:17.780
<v Speaker 3>It's the pipeline. It's the everything.

725
00:35:17.820 --> 00:35:19.929
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so the LLM has no state.

726
00:35:20.300 --> 00:35:20.460
<v Speaker 2>Right.

727
00:35:20.559 --> 00:35:22.380
<v Speaker 1>So the harness is the thing that keeps track of

728
00:35:22.420 --> 00:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the state and the memory and all of that and

729
00:35:24.420 --> 00:35:26.179
<v Speaker 1>makes it a worthwhile experience.

730
00:35:26.539 --> 00:35:28.929
<v Speaker 2>Everything that's moved us past prompt engineering.

731
00:35:29.239 --> 00:35:29.429
<v Speaker 1>Right.

732
00:35:29.469 --> 00:35:29.670
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

733
00:35:29.829 --> 00:35:29.969
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

734
00:35:30.130 --> 00:35:30.449
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

735
00:35:31.289 --> 00:35:32.949
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a show, guys. What do you think?

736
00:35:33.550 --> 00:35:35.929
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I think that was, that's a lot of fun.

737
00:35:36.289 --> 00:35:38.510
<v Speaker 3>And thanks, Cliff, for sending in this story.

738
00:35:38.969 --> 00:35:39.550
<v Speaker 5>Always.

739
00:35:39.590 --> 00:35:41.619
<v Speaker 3>By all means, keep sending in stories.

740
00:35:41.639 --> 00:35:42.199
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

741
00:35:42.320 --> 00:35:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

742
00:35:42.880 --> 00:35:43.099
<v Speaker 5>Thanks.

743
00:35:43.460 --> 00:35:47.059
<v Speaker 1>And check out our Discord. And, well, gee whiz, that's

744
00:35:47.099 --> 00:35:49.429
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about from last week, and we'll see

745
00:35:49.449 --> 00:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you next week on Security This Week.

746
00:35:50.909 --> 00:35:51.190
<v Speaker 4>Bye-bye.

747
00:35:51.230 --> 00:35:54.309
<v Speaker 3>Bye. Bye, guys.
