Speaker 1: Okay, hello, we are alive. Finally.
Speaker 2: It is Friday, November eighth already, and over here in
Speaker 2: Mountain Standard time, it is ten oh six a m.
Speaker 2: So something interesting occurred.
Speaker 1: I gotta miss.
Speaker 2: Phone doesn't ring, but it just always tells me I
Speaker 2: have a miss call.
Speaker 1: That's stupid.
Speaker 2: Anyway, we have something kind of neat that just occurred.
Speaker 2: So I hope everybody will do this. It's really not
Speaker 2: that difficult. It's fun. It's something that you can do
Speaker 2: to change things for the better. And who better?
Speaker 1: Who better?
Speaker 2: So I got this email. I got two of them.
Speaker 2: Actually I'll start with this one. He says, Hello everyone.
Speaker 2: President elect Trump has tasked Robert Kennedy Junior with figuring
Speaker 2: out how to make America healthy again. I guess one
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty years was enough, uh, of the complete
Speaker 2: opposite and wrong.
Speaker 1: Way to do things.
Speaker 2: He is looking for the right people for the job.
Speaker 2: Nominate me for this task force, and let's see what happens.
Speaker 2: Here's the link, DMO torpedoes and full speed ahead. And
Speaker 2: when you hear that, you must already recognize that's doctor Glitton.
Speaker 2: So this is what happens when you click on the
Speaker 2: link that I will show you in the description here
Speaker 2: it's right there.
Speaker 1: So it says nominees dot maha now dot org, m
Speaker 1: a h A n OW dot org.
Speaker 2: For those of you listening on podcasts, it's nominees spelling
Speaker 2: that is n O M I n E E s
Speaker 2: dot m a h A now dot org. And here
Speaker 2: are the steps. What did you say? Let's see Step one,
Speaker 2: click the damn link. Step two, submit nomine that's what
Speaker 2: you click tab on upright hand corner. Step three, you
Speaker 2: will be asked to fill in a number of fields.
Speaker 2: Here are the answers. Nominee name, Peter Glidden, n D
Speaker 2: email d R Glidden at ProtonMail, dot com, phone eight
Speaker 2: y five three four seven three six nine six bio.
Speaker 2: And then you put leave bigfarm behind dot com backslash
Speaker 2: doctor Glidden publications, everybody sick and I Know I a
Speaker 2: tepticure with holistic medicine, Amazon websites, leave Bigfarmer behind dot
Speaker 2: com videos tune in in the list reference social media
Speaker 2: links below. Also watch this one and that's leap big
Speaker 2: Farmer behind dot com back lesh maha.
Speaker 1: He made one for it.
Speaker 2: Socialist rumble at doctor Glynnen, YouTube at doctor Glydden and
Speaker 2: the rest okay, So nominators thoughts on what would make
Speaker 2: this nominee a value member of a future Trump Unity government.
Speaker 2: I'm going to say before I even look at this,
Speaker 2: is that who better to be in charge of nutrition
Speaker 2: than doctor Peter Glidden and doctor Manso. You should fill
Speaker 2: out a separate one for him, and you don't have
Speaker 2: to go into detail like I saw somebody wrote in
Speaker 2: like takes on Big Farmer. It's like, don't you these
Speaker 2: people are paid by Big Farmer. You don't want to
Speaker 2: say that directly, you know, you want to say all
Speaker 2: the positives that are neutral, you know, and rather than
Speaker 2: you know, expert on nutrition understands whole foods and their
Speaker 2: importance to help, you know, uses what they call clinical
Speaker 2: nutrition to you know, solve Prepel's ailments. You don't even
Speaker 2: want to say curious disease because that's not something they
Speaker 2: want to hear. Because these little bastards are going to
Speaker 2: be scrutinizing these nominations. It's not going to be somebody
Speaker 2: with an open mind, right, They're going to be watching
Speaker 2: their bottom line. So just be careful when you do
Speaker 2: things like that. So he says number one is confident
Speaker 2: doctor Peter Glindon is a licensed nature pactic. Doctor number
Speaker 2: two is honest, has integrity and courage. Doctorter Glennon calls
Speaker 2: well he wrote it in there, doctor Puit and calls
Speaker 2: out big Pharma to his own peril. See, I would
Speaker 2: have like left that away personally in my opinion, because
Speaker 2: you got to think about who your audience is here
Speaker 2: when you're writing this is respectful. Doctor Peter Glidden had
Speaker 2: gained the respect of his community and collaborates with many
Speaker 2: on podcasts and disseminating impactful medical knowledge. And Daniel Christos
Speaker 2: is awesome. Oh no, it doesn't say that.
Speaker 1: Has a proven record.
Speaker 2: His many podcasts are full of thankful followers that have
Speaker 2: been cured of many diseases. Again, I would have said
Speaker 2: ease deveilments or something like that, because again, you have
Speaker 2: to understand your audience.
Speaker 1: I mean, you do your way, you do it your way.
Speaker 2: But I'm just saying, why are we looking to tell
Speaker 2: them everything up front and were hard in your sleeve?
Speaker 2: Or do you wait till you get in the door
Speaker 2: and then you could express your philosophy.
Speaker 1: And your.
Speaker 2: Your your your opinions once you're already in You know
Speaker 2: what I mean? That's all I'm saying, there's triggers on
Speaker 2: these people, and they're not they're not good. So anyway,
Speaker 2: and this is what the website looks like. This is
Speaker 2: Kennedy Maha. There you go, So top right hand corner,
Speaker 2: see that little red buttons and submit numinee. That's where
Speaker 2: you would submit oddly enough, all right, and there you go.
Speaker 2: There's some more stuff in here. Department of Health and
Speaker 2: Human Services is what he wants. So it says agencies
Speaker 2: for which the nominee is best suited. Department of Health
Speaker 2: and Human Services. Could you imagine, doctor Glyndon, Do you
Speaker 2: know how things would not mean? It would be better
Speaker 2: depending on how much pushback there is. And there we
Speaker 2: understand what I mean. Yeah, Boom says love that last
Speaker 2: doctor g chat yesterday. All right, so that was that. No,
Speaker 2: let's get into this next thing.
Speaker 1: Here. Do we have to do that?
Speaker 2: I do, okay, So now we're going to do this.
Speaker 2: So this time I have to cook that part my
Speaker 2: will and you can fill in whatever else you want
Speaker 2: to put in after that. My will to whatever is
Speaker 2: not high today FTJ is down. By the way, you're
Speaker 2: not watching an NFTJ. I tell you that much, right, now.
Speaker 1: There we go. So let's start with this one. Here
Speaker 1: it's on, So here we go.
Speaker 2: Here's an update, and this is going to tie into
Speaker 2: what we're going to talk about today if I have
Speaker 2: the energy to actually read.
Speaker 3: I'm the woman that was responsible for reporting pean At
Speaker 3: the squirrel and Fred the raccoon, which resulted in them
Speaker 3: being taken from their home and then euthanized.
Speaker 4: Her name is Monica Kessler and she's from Texas.
Speaker 1: And Kessler Kessler.
Speaker 2: Right, Let's get that for a second, showing sir name
Speaker 2: Kessl has multiple origins including German, Dutch and oh look
Speaker 2: at that Jewish, Ashkenazi, trashcan Nazi. Surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise.
Speaker 1: Back to it.
Speaker 3: She bragged about reporting Pena and Fred, and since then
Speaker 3: she has deleted her accounts.
Speaker 2: Bragged about it, bragged about ripping somebody's basically their family members,
Speaker 2: their children away from them and murdering them.
Speaker 1: That sounds very Ashkenazi to me.
Speaker 3: She deleted all of her social media accounts because everybody's
Speaker 3: extremely upset about this wrongful euthanasia. And for those of
Speaker 3: you that don't know, pin At the Squirrel was a
Speaker 3: beloved squirrel on social media with millions of followers, who
Speaker 3: was taken from his home on Wednesday, who was raised
Speaker 3: by this family as a baby and then taken from
Speaker 3: his home because of a complaint by this woman. Both
Speaker 3: Pina and Fred the raccoon were euthanized. But the thing
Speaker 3: that's crazy about it is she's a photographer, that's a conservationalist.
Speaker 3: A lot of what she does is film nature, but
Speaker 3: had no problem ruining this squirrel and raccoon's lives and
Speaker 3: the life of many other rescue animals.
Speaker 1: What about the lives of Mark and his wife.
Speaker 3: Because Pena and Fred were bringing in a lot of
Speaker 3: money that was helping a lot of rescue animals. This
Speaker 3: is part of the reason why everybody's upset and now
Speaker 3: all that is gone because of one person.
Speaker 4: I feel terrible for their family.
Speaker 2: So let's just stop for a second and look at that.
Speaker 2: Because this is what internet can do, and this is
Speaker 2: what this system that we live in does. Anybody. They
Speaker 2: don't have to even live in the same state as
Speaker 2: you can make a complaint to anyone. And because the
Speaker 2: system is always looking for excuses to flex their muscle,
Speaker 2: exercise their chek a like police state influence on other
Speaker 2: people unsuspectingly. They will take that and run with it regardless. No,
Speaker 2: there's no process of you know, verification of a complaint
Speaker 2: none whatsoever. They don't have to verify anything. They don't
Speaker 2: do it, then they should, But that's not the point.
Speaker 2: Somebody from a distance watching something on TikTok or Instagram
Speaker 2: had a bug up her ass because she's a freaking
Speaker 2: busybody with an ill intent for other humans, decided to
Speaker 2: turn them in, saying I fear because of my expert
Speaker 2: knowledge of being a nature photographer.
Speaker 1: Somehow makes that I don't know what the hell that means.
Speaker 2: I feel that they have Rabi's Well, we're gonna get
Speaker 2: into how rabies isn't even a freaking thing at all
Speaker 2: at all? Fraud since pasture. So this is a complete
Speaker 2: live This is more of the same wave lie crap.
Speaker 2: This is the virus fraud in action. This does tie
Speaker 2: in directly to what we're talking about today, And when
Speaker 2: you get done watching the show today, you're gonna be
Speaker 2: either a plenty pissed but also very well informed. And
Speaker 2: hopefully this these amount of examples that I'm showing you,
Speaker 2: you're gonna be hard pressed to find. Well, what about
Speaker 2: this one when it comes to viruses. We've gone through
Speaker 2: all of this information in the last four episodes of
Speaker 2: this part of this series, and way more before that
Speaker 2: for the last six years of how this is all
Speaker 2: a fraud. All injections are poisonous because it's the improper,
Speaker 2: unnatural way to administer anything.
Speaker 1: Period.
Speaker 2: Drugs do not do anything but poison you and put
Speaker 2: a strain on your body to have to react because
Speaker 2: it's being forced into doing something negating, well not negating,
Speaker 2: but ignoring what it else is causing to adjust to it.
Speaker 2: Anti virals and anti biotics are straight poison. And the
Speaker 2: level of antibiotic that they give people who they are
Speaker 2: trying to preventively stop you know, some kind of virus
Speaker 2: from from harming you know, in a crisis event quote unquote,
Speaker 2: they're deadly. And then they say, oh, it was the
Speaker 2: blah blah blah that got him. He died of Remember
Speaker 2: the doctor forty seven years old died of quote unquote
Speaker 2: avian flu. No, they shot him full of freaking antibiotics
Speaker 2: and anti virals and it killed them. And then they're like, oh,
Speaker 2: that's a that's a death for them because he got
Speaker 2: exposed to it. There's No, there's no rhyme or reason.
Speaker 2: There's no verification any of this. They never ever isolate
Speaker 2: anything because it's all smoke and mirrors. It's just an
Speaker 2: excuse to poison and kill. And they believe their own
Speaker 2: bullshit and that's why the doctors die too.
Speaker 4: Flee.
Speaker 1: Oh what do you got? I think, so the next one.
Speaker 2: And give me a yo yo yo. Yes it does
Speaker 2: if you can hear them, because otherwise I actually do
Speaker 2: it all over again. This guy's here offends me. It's
Speaker 2: Nikki Holliday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I'm not. I'm not thrilled with him.
Speaker 2: But at least he's talking about this, and this is
Speaker 2: the information that we're looking for.
Speaker 1: So okay, okay, well you know Colleen.
Speaker 2: If so, Colleen, since we're here, says I nominated him,
Speaker 2: but I didn't have all the pertinent info because I
Speaker 2: got the second email with all of it afterward. Hopefully
Speaker 2: it won't affect anything. I think it's better that it's
Speaker 2: not cookie cutter. You know that it's not a carbon
Speaker 2: copy each time. I think it's better that you know,
Speaker 2: you expressed it in your own way. I mean having
Speaker 2: the details of you know, h you know, Health and
Speaker 2: Human Services is the department, and you know those little
Speaker 2: details like that, that's that should be consistent. But as
Speaker 2: far as how you you know, express why you think so,
Speaker 2: I think that's a I think it's good that it's
Speaker 2: a little b different. Mine's gonna be different. I'm not
Speaker 2: gonna follow a pattern or a copy and paste.
Speaker 1: So all right.
Speaker 2: And yeah, so yeah again once again, if you're used
Speaker 2: to watching this on FTG media, it's it's not working
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 1: All right, here you go.
Speaker 4: What the squirrel and Fred the ratcou.
Speaker 2: Come on now, I gotta start it all over. Hopefully
Speaker 2: it wasn't anything important the first few seconds. All these
Speaker 2: should be audial on is.
Speaker 1: This went on? Yeah? Just just that one wonderful boone.
Speaker 4: Has finally come out to speak her side of the story.
Speaker 4: She started a TikTok profile.
Speaker 2: The bitch is crying, she caused pain, and then she's
Speaker 2: the victim off of Ashkenazi.
Speaker 4: Of her and plans to go live tomorrow around eight pm.
Speaker 3: The first thing she dropped earlier today is a message
Speaker 3: that says, I reported this squirrel on the raccoon because
Speaker 3: I genuinely feared.
Speaker 1: That they might have rabies.
Speaker 2: It might from a distance. This person first said that
Speaker 2: they got bitten by them.
Speaker 1: That was the That was the intel there. So that
Speaker 1: was a fucking lie, you know.
Speaker 2: And I'm gonna I'm gonna write you, I'm gonna see
Speaker 2: if I can find the other one. But because there
Speaker 2: was a high stress situation, because Pina didn't didn't recognize
Speaker 2: these assholes in uniform when they go to grab him,
Speaker 2: he did bite one of them. That doesn't mean he's rabid,
Speaker 2: but I'm sure that influenced their decision or gave him
Speaker 2: more of an excuse to do what they did. They
Speaker 2: didn't watch, so what was wrong with thread? Why couldn't
Speaker 2: they put him an observation for the ten days? They
Speaker 2: can't run tests because there's nothing to fucking test for.
Speaker 2: Raybi's is a fucking lie. The same exact quote unquote
Speaker 2: symptoms present themselves from malnutrition, and.
Speaker 1: We'll read about other things that could produce it.
Speaker 2: But guess what, folming of the mouth isn't one of them,
Speaker 2: and obviously neither of them were doing that.
Speaker 1: Anyway. This is all bullshit, all of it.
Speaker 2: Every last bit of what you've been told about what
Speaker 2: causes illness is a lie, a goddamn lie.
Speaker 3: Tension was to ensure that everyone, including the owner, would
Speaker 3: be safe. First off, mind your own business. That squirrel on,
Speaker 3: that raccoon, and whatever that family's got going on has
Speaker 3: nothing to do with you.
Speaker 4: You can read the rest, but I care not to.
Speaker 4: She ends it with, forgive me no.
Speaker 3: Then she gets bold enough to drop a v of
Speaker 3: both the squirrel and the raccoon in heaven. Bro, you're
Speaker 3: the cost of them going to heaven. But easily the
Speaker 3: craziest thing she did was drop a video of herself crying.
Speaker 3: There is no world that this is gonna work. Dude,
Speaker 3: there's gonna be no sympathy in this matter. Then she
Speaker 3: drops a video of her out and about like we care.
Speaker 3: And then she posts this video of squirrels attacking people,
Speaker 3: which leads me to believe.
Speaker 4: That she is not sorry for what she did.
Speaker 1: But what do you guys think? All right, So there
Speaker 1: you go.
Speaker 2: And I don't know if you caught how hideous she is,
Speaker 2: but look, keep that in mind when we go to
Speaker 2: this next one, because this is one of the motivations.
Speaker 2: It was envy and jealousy, awful ashkanazi of her again
Speaker 2: and it says, so we know the real reason why
Speaker 2: the woman Monica.
Speaker 1: Okay, and just in case that part gets cut off.
Speaker 3: Now I know the real reason why the woman Monica
Speaker 3: filed the complaint against Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon.
Speaker 1: Fucking jealousy, That's what it was to hurt her.
Speaker 3: It's because INC Goddess here also goes by INC underscore
Speaker 3: Danny is an OnlyFans model and Monica.
Speaker 2: Here was just a fat ugly discussing horrific Ashkenazi and
Speaker 2: bread and therefore hates every other woman on the planet.
Speaker 3: It's so spiteful and hateful towards these people for not
Speaker 3: only having animals and being profitable, but because she's involved
Speaker 3: in adult content. There is no other reason why she
Speaker 3: was so adamant about ruining these people's lives.
Speaker 4: And I'll say this, the world is tough enough.
Speaker 3: Whatever people have to do to make a living and
Speaker 3: get buy in this economy is their business.
Speaker 2: And on that note, just so everybody knows, my Only
Speaker 2: Fans page should be up in about a week.
Speaker 3: Nobody should be shamed for how they make money. So
Speaker 3: because of the passing of Fred and Penat, there's a
Speaker 3: go fundme started by INC Goddess and her husband to
Speaker 3: help pay for all the other animals that are rescued
Speaker 3: that need help. You can find a link on her
Speaker 3: page if you want to support these animals. It's definitely
Speaker 3: what Fred and Peanut would have wanted. What happened is
Speaker 3: a shame because these people are doing more than most
Speaker 3: people would do with the money that they have, and
Speaker 3: I believe protecting and helping rescue animals is one of
Speaker 3: the greatest things you can do.
Speaker 2: So so there you go, petty, little minded, fucking pieces
Speaker 2: of shit who cause murder and destroy families and ruin
Speaker 2: people's lives. When ashke Nazi and oh wait, hold on,
Speaker 2: there's more, that's not the only one.
Speaker 1: Hold on.
Speaker 2: I think I've shown you this before, but what the hell,
Speaker 2: let's do it again, all right, So when you come
Speaker 2: to my ball of user's page, well let's look at
Speaker 2: this one first. It would have ended differently. Arm your scrolls, everybody,
Speaker 2: But there is a kind of a message here for
Speaker 2: us in that bill got to happen on any level.
Speaker 2: Apply that to whatever situation you feel he should. So
Speaker 2: I wrote something here last night I was lee. I
Speaker 2: probably didn't type everywhere correctly, and so there's a huge
Speaker 2: lesson to learn here. The system isn't made to protect
Speaker 2: but to prey on you. It has been infiltrated and
Speaker 2: co opt co opted. A random woman with the ove
Speaker 2: name of Kessler called it a complaint with no evidence
Speaker 2: or justification, told lies and claimed rabies, which I can
Speaker 2: prove isn't a virus and doesn't exist as a contagion.
Speaker 2: And that's all it took. That's all it took for
Speaker 2: four other oives that have no business in state or
Speaker 2: federal government to sign off on and pass to a
Speaker 2: judge for an order. This was an investigation that was launched.
Speaker 2: Guilt was already assumed. Mark and his wife, the homeowners
Speaker 2: were intruded upon by false constitutional authority.
Speaker 1: But I would saying Mark.
Speaker 2: Now, Mark was treated as a criminal and his family
Speaker 2: member were abducted and murdered. They didn't observe the animals
Speaker 2: to see if they were quote unquote rabid, which isn't
Speaker 2: the thing as they are supposed to. They murdered them
Speaker 2: almost right away. This was not a legitimate act of
Speaker 2: concern for the animals. It was a cold blooded hit
Speaker 2: by what could be equated to a check of police.
Speaker 2: If these were your children, would you sit outside or
Speaker 2: would you make every effort, including paying the ultimate price,
Speaker 2: an attempt to put down the would be thug assassins.
Speaker 1: They deceived Mark. He didn't know what they were going
Speaker 1: to do to them.
Speaker 2: Don't never let authorities take any one or any loved
Speaker 2: pet from you.
Speaker 1: Resist all assaults on your natural rights.
Speaker 2: Express your rights, Stand for yours and your family's right
Speaker 2: to be left alone when they come to your door.
Speaker 1: Don't make it easy. And then there you go.
Speaker 2: I've shown you this before. I didn't write this, I
Speaker 2: didn't type this, I didn't put this together. I actually
Speaker 2: barred it from somebody who was sharing it on their telegram.
Speaker 2: But there wasn't theirs either.
Speaker 1: Thanks jose So Polka, He says, these wayves.
Speaker 2: In charge of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation
Speaker 2: ordered the kidnapping and execution of a harmless squirrel. Here's
Speaker 2: the murderers who were not allowed to say so because
Speaker 2: their tribe owns everything, including the country through murder, treasure, treachery, usury,
Speaker 2: victimhood and trump. I could have added that I'm very
Speaker 2: sorry for your loss. Same rotten cult of death every time,
Speaker 2: and I put at penat on there.
Speaker 1: That's marks there.
Speaker 2: Ye know, somebody had something funny that I guess they
Speaker 2: thought that was funny. The squirrel was a Hamas sympathizer.
Speaker 2: They need to be brought up on animal cruelty church.
Speaker 2: I didn't even see these before they determined. And then
Speaker 2: I said, you know the animal cruelty charges. I go
Speaker 2: the departments. They determined those roles themselves through their agencies,
Speaker 2: and therefore aren't held to any standards themselves.
Speaker 1: But so wake up here. Don't expect the system to
Speaker 1: indict the system. It's not gonna happen. They are free
Speaker 1: of any scrutiny.
Speaker 2: And just so you know, here's both Bolsheviks killed sixty
Speaker 2: million people before World War two and.
Speaker 1: How many after.
Speaker 2: We'll just keep adding it up. COVID is part of
Speaker 2: their shit too. All right, I'm gonna have to find
Speaker 2: a video for you. I have something that something came up,
Speaker 2: and I gotta go take care of it real quick.
Speaker 1: So let me go ahead and do that. And then.
Speaker 2: I think I know exactly what I want to do here.
Speaker 2: I was catching up a lot, like I think something
Speaker 2: just came out yesterday. But up until then I had
Speaker 2: watched all the crow houses I hadn't seen before. Destabilization
Speaker 2: is a new one and a detox nano particles naturally.
Speaker 2: Oh no, that's just a that's a never mind, that's
Speaker 2: an ad Uh. Yeah, looks like he has two up
Speaker 2: here though the last four hours. Maybe it's the same
Speaker 2: exact video today. Oh yeah, it is, because these.
Speaker 1: Aren't hidden from her site. God damn it. Why they
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 2: Like white people are. If you're I've said this before,
Speaker 2: but it needs to be said again. If you're on
Speaker 2: the same platform as the person who actually produces the stuff,
Speaker 2: why the hell would you mirror it for you for
Speaker 2: your channel? You know, like I mean, repurpose it, repost
Speaker 2: it the same exact video and do it fifty times
Speaker 2: on fifty different channels. That takes away from the person
Speaker 2: who actually put it out there in the first place.
Speaker 2: You're not helping them, it's not it's you're you're doing
Speaker 2: the exact opposite in fact, So the fuck stop it.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: There's lots of good stuff here. The final chessboard one
Speaker 2: was annoying it. Max was great and there's a lot
Speaker 2: of good stuff in here, but the LSNT lady kept
Speaker 2: on cutting him off and it was getting so frustrating
Speaker 2: towards the end. Uh and she would just continue to
Speaker 2: talk right off the top of him, like she didn't
Speaker 2: even have like a oh sorry, like sometimes you do
Speaker 2: a false start, sometimes there's a pause and you think,
Speaker 2: but she didn't. She just rolled right over the top
Speaker 2: of him all the time. And she was in agreement
Speaker 2: with him. It wasn't like she was trying to like
Speaker 2: counter him. It was just she's an idiot.
Speaker 1: Hmm, what to do? What to do? All right, polarization.
Speaker 2: I guess we'll go with an investigation and polarization or
Speaker 2: end the occupation. There's also one here in the investigation
Speaker 2: into really war crimes of Gaza. I think it's a
Speaker 2: little too light. It's an ald Jazeera investigation. And the
Speaker 2: Wooman that they picked is also racist against white people
Speaker 2: of course, right, But she does say positive things, but
Speaker 2: then she spins it to like a a direction that
Speaker 2: didn't need to fucking go. So that was a stupid
Speaker 2: person to choose. She's good, a little bit of a
Speaker 2: hateful human being. Yeah, let's go with that one. Let's
Speaker 2: do the gods at war times. I mean, this is long,
Speaker 2: This isn't even maxis he just shared it. It's from
Speaker 2: Al Jazeera, who, by the way, now is considered a
Speaker 2: terrorist group because Israel says, so wait till you become
Speaker 2: a terrorist group. I was told I was a hate
Speaker 2: group with I was on Patreon last so I can't
Speaker 2: use the name of the show. That's why it's called
Speaker 2: Disguised Limits.
Speaker 1: On Patreon.
Speaker 2: One, I had one person subscribed it following for three dollars,
Speaker 2: and they're like, you're using that money to support a
Speaker 2: hate group. I'm like, you can't even get mildly miffed.
Speaker 2: You can't given slightly irritated with three dollars a month,
Speaker 2: You stupid. But the dude's name was Laire and I
Speaker 2: suspect he had purple hair, and he kept on he
Speaker 2: just every time I would counter, like, what's your proof,
Speaker 2: what's your proof? Can you tell me what you're talking about,
Speaker 2: it was nope, You're you're a hater. You're a hater, Daniel.
Speaker 2: You hate people, Like, hey, I'm starting to hate you, buddy.
Speaker 1: You might be right.
Speaker 2: It's like, so you determined that without without any evidence.
Speaker 2: It's just just your personal dictate that that makes somebody
Speaker 2: hate hater. All right, So we're going to go into
Speaker 2: video confers tanks struck Home, where there's really captives October seventh.
Speaker 1: Yes, their tank. So all right, so we'll start here.
Speaker 2: This is just a little bit of an intermission before
Speaker 2: I get started reading. I think the vitality of my
Speaker 2: and my will to live is coming back a little
Speaker 2: bit here. You know, it's either love or being angry
Speaker 2: about something, right, it's the only thing that keeps me going.
Speaker 2: And then since there's no love and return here in
Speaker 2: this fucking house, then I just gotta go with being
Speaker 2: pissed off all the time.
Speaker 1: We only fucking day. All right, here we go. Alright,
Speaker 1: let's go to there and play.
Speaker 2: I'll be back into a moment enjoy one of those
Speaker 2: things where you don't get I hate reading.
Speaker 1: These things, and you're like, can you just narrate, motherfucker,
Speaker 1: you lazy fuck.
Speaker 2: Yeah No, I'm not doing this. We're gonna get it
Speaker 2: ahead of you. I'm not gonn annoy you with that shit.
Speaker 2: Come on, Max, bring it home at next bring it home.
Speaker 5: Here we go showed you at the start of the video.
Speaker 5: There is incredibly significant, folks. You know, when it really
Speaker 5: sinks into people's minds. The people who died at the
Speaker 5: Nova Festival on October seventh, two thousand and twenty three,
Speaker 5: were all actually killed by ideev When it sinks in
Speaker 5: that all of the burnt homes are the results of
Speaker 5: tank shelling, And when it really sinks in that the
Speaker 5: videos we saw of a mass apparently allegedly shooting people.
Speaker 2: In the street.
Speaker 5: Were AI generated. This puts a whole new light on everything.
Speaker 2: It really does.
Speaker 5: Got some music lessons happening out here, folks. They bring
Speaker 5: the kids from the orphanage down here and they teach
Speaker 5: them music, which is pretty cool. But when it really
Speaker 5: sinks in that some of the videos we saw of
Speaker 5: these alleged atrocities were literally AI generated, they didn't happen,
Speaker 5: and that the IDF killed their own people on October
Speaker 5: seventh to get the body count high enough to justify
Speaker 5: their genocide of Palestine. When it really sinks in what
Speaker 5: these people have done, you begin to see the very
Speaker 5: dangerous situation the world is in. And remember, these people
Speaker 5: have infiltrated all of our governments. The entire United States
Speaker 5: government is occupied. America is essentially an occupied country. It's
Speaker 5: been occupied by Jews who have taken control of the
Speaker 5: government and how directing American foreign policy, which is why
Speaker 5: Israel is being funded in this genocide.
Speaker 3: Do.
Speaker 1: I often we were Israel before Israel is Israel. Yes,
Speaker 1: I do. That's the answer. All right, let's get into
Speaker 1: reading this now here we go.
Speaker 2: All right, I'm gonna start with this highlighted yellow thing
Speaker 2: in the side here. There's a couple of bookmarks that
Speaker 2: I wanted to kind of cover before we get going into.
Speaker 1: What the hell's ader drophobia? You might ask, I'll tell
Speaker 1: you in a second.
Speaker 2: Relax, all right, so page two forty three of bay
Speaker 2: Shop or pasteur Germs of disease cannot exist primarily in
Speaker 2: the air we breathe, in the food we eat, or
Speaker 2: in the water we drink. For the disease, micro organisms
Speaker 2: unscientifically described as germs, since they are neither spores nor eggs,
Speaker 2: proceed necessarily from a sick body, meaning disease happens from within,
Speaker 2: and when it's in a weakened state, then these other
Speaker 2: things can affect it. And that's why some people get
Speaker 2: sick and some people don't, because they're already in a
Speaker 2: weakened state, malnourished, something full of toxins. Already. You know,
Speaker 2: you have a threshold, and when you exceed that, things
Speaker 2: start to break or get misaligned. Out of balance. You
Speaker 2: gotta rate that ship now I want to. I don't
Speaker 2: want to navigate from that, but I'm gonna do it anyway.
Speaker 2: That's nothing on I was looking for.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I'm not sure why I did that would either.
Speaker 2: Okay, here we go. Vaccines says a weapon. Let me
Speaker 2: see what that one says. So they're going through the
Speaker 2: list of the smallpox desks before and after the shots,
Speaker 2: and since they escalated from there, the excuse was the
Speaker 2: conditions of war. You know, oh, this is a smallpox
Speaker 2: I'll break blah blah blah, not taking an account that
Speaker 2: they're utilizing chemical warfare and all kinds of crap and
Speaker 2: not eating properly. And then they're having all these problems
Speaker 2: and they're like, oh, these symptoms are blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: And then they start vaccinating the crap out of people
Speaker 2: and they cause more death. Vaccine as a weapon, kill
Speaker 2: more people, because that's what war's all about, it's a
Speaker 2: depopulation event. And then it did not require much perceptibility
Speaker 2: to realize that if pastory and treatment could secure any
Speaker 2: appearance of success, the pecuniary advantages would be considerable. Thus
Speaker 2: Pastor inaugur the era that was to see the prostitution
Speaker 2: of science to commercialism.
Speaker 1: Remember that.
Speaker 2: The pity is that since Pastor's day there should have
Speaker 2: been so much fear mongering on the subject. For hydrophobia
Speaker 2: is a complaint of the nerves, and consequently fear is
Speaker 2: the primary factor.
Speaker 1: Hey, look at that.
Speaker 2: Various instances have been recorded of cases unquestionably brought on
Speaker 2: by suggestion. Is that echoing what we were just talking
Speaker 2: about previously with those three videos from Instagram? All right,
Speaker 2: let's get into it. Let me get this out of
Speaker 2: the way, all right. To the average person of the
Speaker 2: present day, the mention of the name Pasture immediately conjures
Speaker 2: up the thought of a horrible malady hydrophobia. To the
Speaker 2: any who have only superficial understanding of his connection with fermentation,
Speaker 2: silkworm troubles and anti anthrax inoculation, which was another big joke,
Speaker 2: he is nevertheless famous as a savior of humanity from
Speaker 2: the ravages.
Speaker 1: Of mad dogs.
Speaker 2: Whoopsie, you're gonna find out here soon. And then here
Speaker 2: it is what we just wrote.
Speaker 1: Read.
Speaker 2: The pity is that since Pastor's day there should have
Speaker 2: been so much fear mongery on the subject. For hydrophobia
Speaker 2: is a complaint of the nerves, and consequently fear is
Speaker 2: its primary factor. Various instances have been recorded of cases
Speaker 2: unquestionably brought on by suggestion.
Speaker 1: For example, two young Frenchmen were bitten at.
Speaker 2: Is that like Brett Favre harv at harv by the
Speaker 2: same dog in January eighteen fifteen three. One died from
Speaker 2: the effects within a month, or infection or anything that
Speaker 2: they try to treat him with. But before this, the
Speaker 2: other young man had sailed for America, where he lived
Speaker 2: for fifteen years and total ignorance of the death of
Speaker 2: his former companion. In September eighteen sixty eight, he returned
Speaker 2: to France and learned of the tragedy, and then himself
Speaker 2: developed symptoms. Within three weeks he was dead of hydrophobia
Speaker 2: brought on by a suggestion or something else. Again, a
Speaker 2: patient who had first threatened to bite his medical attendant,
Speaker 2: after being told that the correct symptom in a human
Speaker 2: being was actually the use of the fists, struck out
Speaker 2: all around him like a boxer and indulged up to
Speaker 2: the time of his death. In this quite novel form
Speaker 2: of paroxysms. The avoidance of fear is therefore a fundamental
Speaker 2: importance after a dog bite, and the very slight risk
Speaker 2: of serious disease is confirmed by the thousands of innocuous
Speaker 2: bites received by veterinary surgeons and others who constantly handle animals.
Speaker 2: And that's all that happened with the scumbags who went
Speaker 2: into marx Holm and picked up an animal, a wild animal,
Speaker 2: even though he's domesticated. He didn't know them, and the
Speaker 2: midim I'm sure he wasn't. I'm sure he wasn't on
Speaker 2: the ground bleeding to death. It's probably a little ay ow.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 2: Occasionally there may be a victim to a bite, in
Speaker 2: the same way that deaths have been known to occur
Speaker 2: after pinpricks and stings of insects. While scratches and wounds
Speaker 2: sometimes bring about tetanus, I don't think that's true.
Speaker 1: Tetanus is usually from horseshit, of.
Speaker 2: Which complaint hydrophobia appears to be a variety. According to
Speaker 2: Sir Victor Horsley's evidence before the Lord's Committee on Rabies,
Speaker 2: the probability of hydrophobia after dog bite among the untreated
Speaker 2: has been variously calculated to be from five percent to
Speaker 2: fifteen percent. A French researcher named Booley has stated that
Speaker 2: of the one hundred persons bitten by rabbit animals quote
Speaker 2: unquote rabid animals, the entirely and entirely untreated in any
Speaker 2: way whatever, not more than five would develop symptoms of hydrophobia.
Speaker 2: See oh gee, why is that out of one hundred
Speaker 2: and only five and so therefore transmissibility. Or maybe it's
Speaker 2: because their observations are wrong as to what actually this is,
Speaker 2: because it sure cell isn't the virus. Only five of them,
Speaker 2: but if you give them treatment, I wonder how many
Speaker 2: more would die? Because it's the treatment that freaking kills people.
Speaker 1: Then like, oh, look, it's a Raby's opera.
Speaker 2: Thus, happily, the victim of a supposed mad dog stands
Speaker 2: a very good chance of escaping any trouble if he
Speaker 2: can only be left alone. Exactly, it's the treatment. It's
Speaker 2: the treatment. It's the freaking treatment. To begin with, it
Speaker 2: has to be remember that there is considerable doubt of
Speaker 2: there being any such specific disease as rabies, and a
Speaker 2: mad dog or mad squirrel or mad raccoon in the
Speaker 2: popular sense may possibly be relegated to the same category
Speaker 2: as the witch of the Middle Ages. Well, I mean
Speaker 2: the ones that were away vased. Certainly we're rigious, so
Speaker 2: I'm not going to go that far. The neglected lives
Speaker 2: of the Paria dogs of the East are sufficient to
Speaker 2: account for many finally suffering from the paroxysms and other
Speaker 2: sensors that go by the name of rabies. And when
Speaker 2: we contemplate that chained existences of numbers of dogs in Europe,
Speaker 2: our only wonder is that more do not develop madness.
Speaker 2: It may safely be said that a healthy, happy life
Speaker 2: is the best safeguard against trouble. For an animal to
Speaker 2: be in a savage state or to foam at the
Speaker 2: mouth is not is no real indication of rabies. For instance,
Speaker 2: in a system of surgery we read some idea may
Speaker 2: be gained for the frequency of mistakes of diagnosis in
Speaker 2: connection with canine rabies by the statement of Faber, who
Speaker 2: says that of eight hundred and ninety two dogs brought
Speaker 2: into the Veterinary Institute of Vienna under suspicion of rabies,
Speaker 2: only thirty one proved to be really affected. During a
Speaker 2: scare in England. According to the Field of the nineteen
Speaker 2: eighth of April nineteen nineteen there's a date, then that's
Speaker 2: the one that's the date of the beginning of the
Speaker 2: Feast of Moloch, and when they killed everybody at Wago, mister,
Speaker 2: and the same thing about Oklahoma City.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Mister Robert Vicarii, a well known kennel owner, believed that
Speaker 2: many of the experts called in to diagnose the supposed
Speaker 2: cases of rabies were quite wrong in their reports. It
Speaker 2: seems likely that many animals were merely suffering from dietary
Speaker 2: problems due to wartime conditions deficiencies as wrong feeding has
Speaker 2: been known to produce symptoms of those of so called rabies.
Speaker 1: Fucking case closed.
Speaker 2: As evidenced in the Scare in the Klondike in eighteen
Speaker 2: ninety six, as an account of which has been given
Speaker 2: in the Journal of Zoophily by Arnold George. It is
Speaker 2: clear that more fear than intelligence is shown in regards
Speaker 2: to rabies, particularly as animals suspected of it are almost
Speaker 2: invariably put to death.
Speaker 1: Right, no need to.
Speaker 2: Show that you're wrong about something when you can just
Speaker 2: kill the evidence continue the fraud instead of being kept
Speaker 2: alive under a kind and careful observation.
Speaker 1: What did we just see happen?
Speaker 2: What did we just talk about what do we just
Speaker 2: observe in real time? Almost moreover, once they are dead,
Speaker 2: the complaint cannot be traced to a post mortem examination.
Speaker 2: Test applied is the one introduced by Pasture, And this
Speaker 2: brings us to his commencement of work on the subject.
Speaker 2: And then they say, oh, we had chop off their
Speaker 2: head and go look at their brain. People are friggin'
Speaker 2: animals themselves. It was in the year eighteen eighty that
Speaker 2: two mad dogs were presented to him for investigation by
Speaker 2: an Army veterinary surgeon named Burrell. Then began the series
Speaker 2: of observations, very cruel for the most part, cruel on
Speaker 2: the part of past Dure because he's a scumbag. That
Speaker 2: resulted in the proud announcement he was fauci, But for fauci.
Speaker 2: Remember the freaking fleas in the sedated dogs that have
Speaker 2: their faces eaten off?
Speaker 1: What was that for?
Speaker 2: Then began the series of observations, very cruel for the
Speaker 2: most part, that resulted in the proud announcement to the
Speaker 2: Academy of Science at Paris of a process that would,
Speaker 2: so Pasture maintained.
Speaker 1: Infallibly.
Speaker 2: Prevent rabies from developing in persons who had undergone the
Speaker 2: misfortune to.
Speaker 1: Have been bitten by rabbit animals.
Speaker 2: Right, because Pastor was so right about everything else right,
Speaker 2: everything he did was a complete fraud. The date of
Speaker 2: this communication, October twenty sixth, eighteen eighty five, was memorable
Speaker 2: in the history of medicine and glorious for French science.
Speaker 2: According to the enthusiastic praise of the Chairman of the Academy, M.
Speaker 1: Boulle.
Speaker 2: The day was also memorable for the inauguration of a
Speaker 2: system of intolerance, the antithesis of all that is scientific,
Speaker 2: which has sadly continued with regard to the fetish worship
Speaker 2: of Pastorian orthodoxy. On this eventual, sorry, and this eventful date,
Speaker 2: this intolerance was carried to the length of refusing to
Speaker 2: hear a word from Jules Garin, doctor Colin, or Colin
Speaker 2: and others who dared to offer any criticism of pastures conclusions.
Speaker 2: The great Man had spoken everybody he dared to claim infallibility.
Speaker 1: I call my method perfect it.
Speaker 2: It was demanded that others either offer praise or else
Speaker 2: hold their peace.
Speaker 1: Oh that sounds sounds very democratic.
Speaker 2: Now you know understand that they were steering science in
Speaker 2: this particular direction to make it weaponized against people. Yeah,
Speaker 2: how much there is, Yet how much it was to
Speaker 2: criticize the very inoculation test for proving madness was quite uncertain.
Speaker 2: This test introduced by Pasture and involved taking some matter saliva, blood,
Speaker 2: part of the brain or spinal cord, usually the cerebral
Speaker 2: spinal fluid from the suspected animal and injecting it into
Speaker 2: a living rabbit. So obviously they've already butchered the animal
Speaker 2: that they suspected. Suspected can't confirm just going to go
Speaker 2: with it in injecting it into a living rabbit.
Speaker 5: This is.
Speaker 2: Not only just vivisection and discussing this, but this is
Speaker 2: just cruelty. It is obvious comments sense, apart from Beichamp's
Speaker 2: illuminating explanation that matter from one creature introduced into another
Speaker 2: is likely to be injurious. Vulpian, a French doctor, a
Speaker 2: physiologist and supporter of Pastor himself, found that the saliva
Speaker 2: of healthy human beings killed off rabbits as quickly as
Speaker 2: the saliva of a child who had died of hydrophobia.
Speaker 2: So the test doesn't make freaking sense. You don't put
Speaker 2: foreign on anything, and you don't inject it into something else. Hey,
Speaker 2: that means every injection that you get is wrong and
Speaker 2: poisonous and potentially deadly. And if not today, maybe ten
Speaker 2: years from now. But it doesn't matter, because it's already
Speaker 2: done its damage. The condition of a rabbit after inoculation
Speaker 2: proves nothing except the strength of or weakness of its
Speaker 2: powers of resistance.
Speaker 1: Exactly.
Speaker 2: So if it's very well neutrified and healthy, it might
Speaker 2: be able to fight off the majority of what you
Speaker 2: just you know, subjected it to. But it doesn't mean
Speaker 2: that it's that doesn't tell you anything. And this is
Speaker 2: like ridiculous, childish ignorance to what you're doing. And yet
Speaker 2: the paralysis, oh my god, paralysisation of the hind quarters
Speaker 2: of a rabbit is made the test of rabies in
Speaker 2: the dog from which it received the injection. True that
Speaker 2: nowadays rabbit dogs are said to have negree bodies in
Speaker 2: the nerve cells or other branches, and these are claimed
Speaker 2: to be not causal but diagnostic agents. But considering the
Speaker 2: contradictions and mistakes in regard to the bacteria and disease,
Speaker 2: we may well question a diagnosis that depends on these
Speaker 2: negrieve of bodies, especially as it does not seem to
Speaker 2: have been proved.
Speaker 1: That they are always absent in other diseases. So much
Speaker 1: for the test.
Speaker 2: Now as to the prophylactic, what changes Pastor made from
Speaker 2: the start in his nostrum? In eighteen eighty four and
Speaker 2: a medical congress at Copenhagen, he announced that by weakening
Speaker 2: the virus from dogs, supposedly Mad supposedly assumed, let's just
Speaker 2: go with that. Let's just say they are so that
Speaker 2: way I can continue on with my bullshit by transmission
Speaker 2: through monkeys and by fortifying it again through So.
Speaker 1: Listen to this.
Speaker 2: By transmission through monkeys, so he's taking the critical virus
Speaker 2: that doesn't exist from dogs, supposedly Mad see all these
Speaker 2: assumptions and presumptions already by transmission through monkeys and by
Speaker 2: fortifying again through rabbits. This is who came up with
Speaker 2: this shit. He had obtained something protective to dogs. Let's
Speaker 2: start over again. This is your science, This is the
Speaker 2: science that we live off of. By transmission through monkeys
Speaker 2: and by fortifiing again through rabbits, So chimera effect already
Speaker 2: happening here where you're mixing all kinds of craft together.
Speaker 2: He had obtained something protective to dogs, and which would
Speaker 2: etradicate rabies from the world, considering that nothing then was
Speaker 2: or now is known of the cause of rabies. Let's
Speaker 2: say that again, considering that nothing was or now is
Speaker 2: known of the cause of rabies, if regarded as a
Speaker 2: specific malady, as it was in past year's opinion, surely
Speaker 2: such a boast savors very much of the cuoles of quackery.
Speaker 1: Pastor himself had.
Speaker 2: To admit that he had not succeeded in rendering refractory
Speaker 2: more than fifteen or sixteen out of twenty dogs. Afterwards,
Speaker 2: he abandoned the monkey and as a transmission agent, having
Speaker 2: originally chosen it, he said, because of its physical resemblance
Speaker 2: to man. Wow, how scientific. Wow, physical resemblance to man.
Speaker 2: And you know what was fresh in their minds, all
Speaker 2: this bullshit about evolution, and this is what they're actually
Speaker 2: promoting through the science of medicine. In a pamphlet Hydrophonedbia
Speaker 2: and Pasture by Vincent Richards, the author asks, does the
Speaker 2: result that fifteen or sixteen out of the twenty dogs
Speaker 2: inoculator remain unaffected in any way warrant the assumption that
Speaker 2: the method adopted by by Pasture was protective. Nope, it's
Speaker 2: all observational error. On the twenty sixth of October eighteen
Speaker 2: eighty five, Pasture described his later method of treatment, which
Speaker 2: was to take the spinal cords of rabbits that had
Speaker 2: received injections of virus. Right, what injections of who? Where's
Speaker 2: the assumption here?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 1: Really? How do you say? How so? How do you
Speaker 1: say that? How's that? Verified? Received injections of virus?
Speaker 2: Keep these four varying lengths of time, then beat them up,
Speaker 2: each with twice its own way to sterilized bullion. Finally,
Speaker 2: commencing with the weakest, inoculate the patient for ten days successfully.
Speaker 1: This is the human we're talking about.
Speaker 2: Moreover, he triumphantly pointed to the successful case that of
Speaker 2: Joseph Meister, a little Alsatian boy nine years old who
Speaker 2: had been badly bitten by a dog on the preceding
Speaker 2: fourth of July eighteen eighty five, and two days later
Speaker 2: was taken to Pasture for treatment, this being the crucial
Speaker 2: case upon which Pastor inaugurated his claim to success.
Speaker 1: Let us now review it.
Speaker 2: The worst of the many severe bites received by the
Speaker 2: child were quarterized the same day with carbolic acid. Quoterized
Speaker 2: by carboc acid. At eight pm on July sixth, Pasture
Speaker 2: by means of a Pravez syringe inoculated the boy with
Speaker 2: some drops of his broth of spinal cords. Definitely not sorcery.
Speaker 2: Totally not sorcery. Absolutely not which doctor bullshit at all,
Speaker 2: not the dark magic. What are you talking about?
Speaker 1: This is totally legit. This is science.
Speaker 2: Everybody, shut up, you unscientific person. Taken from rabbits that
Speaker 2: had died of paralytic complaint. Yes, the rabbits were very complaintive.
Speaker 2: They were like, never shutting up about it. They were like, wait,
Speaker 2: heyce paralletic complaint induced by injections into the brains of
Speaker 2: these poor little animals. So when you inject foreign material
Speaker 2: into the brains of something and you paralyze it, does
Speaker 2: that mean that there's a virus or does that mean
Speaker 2: that you just poisoned it because you injected something into
Speaker 2: its brain?
Speaker 1: Anything?
Speaker 2: Right, This is the self affirming bullshit that we deal
Speaker 2: with into the brains of these poor little animals. The
Speaker 2: actual operation was probably undertaken by doctor Grantcher, who was
Speaker 2: present on the occasion. For the following ten days, Joseph
Speaker 2: meister was regularly inoculated with this freaking witch's cauldron brew,
Speaker 2: receiving in all about a dozen injections of the spinal
Speaker 2: cord broth. Now, in considering this case, we must ask
Speaker 2: what proof Pasture had of either the madness of the
Speaker 2: dog or the probability of hydrophobia ensuing in the victim.
Speaker 2: Right but nobody asked us questions. The rabid state of
Speaker 2: the animal was inferted by its savagery, by its savagery,
Speaker 2: because the dog was rightfully upset or whatever, maybe not
Speaker 2: rapefully as maybe abused, maybe hungry, maybe something else, who cares.
Speaker 2: The reason is because of its savagery and the fact
Speaker 2: that a post mortem examination disclosed hay straw and pieces
Speaker 2: of wood in it's in the stomach. That sounds like
Speaker 2: it was trying to eat something that had minerals in it. Instinctively,
Speaker 2: the you know, like piker or whatever the hell they
Speaker 2: call that thing when animals like start chewing on the
Speaker 2: on the barns, on the on the fence, post speak
Speaker 2: because they're they're nutrient and it's some kind of mineral deficiency.
Speaker 1: The presence of the latter.
Speaker 2: Would seem far more likely to indicate that the dog
Speaker 2: had been ravenous, probably starving, a condition that itself would
Speaker 2: have accounted for its savage behavior. As to the boy,
Speaker 2: the number and severity of the bites he had received
Speaker 2: caused the doctor's vulpion and grantor, who were called in
Speaker 2: to decide that he was almost inevitably exposed to contract
Speaker 2: hydrophobia in consequence. Why, as we have seen, there was
Speaker 2: no real proof of Rabi's in the dog that had
Speaker 2: attacked him, But for argument's sake, granting that the animal
Speaker 2: had been mad, it must be remembered that the wounds
Speaker 2: had been quarterized. Though opinions differ as regards to quarterization,
Speaker 2: many authorities seemed strongly in favor, and reference maybe made
Speaker 2: to Yukat's quarterization of upwards of four hundred persons, including
Speaker 2: such application five times on itself, which without hydrophobia developing
Speaker 2: in so much as a single case. But again, what
Speaker 2: is this hydrophobia, what is its actual cause?
Speaker 1: And did they have it?
Speaker 2: Nobody can verify any of that stuff, so we're just
Speaker 2: talking about bullshit here. Doctor Cunningham of Chicago reported as
Speaker 2: quotizing as cortizing one hundred and twenty persons annually as average,
Speaker 2: the mortality as about three in that number, so three
Speaker 2: out of one hundred and twenty died. Pastor himself once
Speaker 2: wrote to a doctor in your Paris as follows, Sir,
Speaker 2: the quoterizations that you have carried out ought to reassure
Speaker 2: you fully as to the consequences of the bite.
Speaker 1: Huh attempts no other treatment? It is useless.
Speaker 2: Oh yes, thank you, thank you. Doctor who isn't a doctor,
Speaker 2: who isn't even really a chemist. Apart from quoterization, the
Speaker 2: chance of hydrophobia developing in a person bitten by a
Speaker 2: so called gen only mad dog has been seen to
Speaker 2: be small, and moreover, as incubation has been known to
Speaker 2: extend to twelve months, often to two years or more.
Speaker 2: The danger for Joseph had obviously not been ended when
Speaker 2: after little more than three months, Pastor dared to claim
Speaker 2: him as a brand snatched from the burning, so to speak,
Speaker 2: by his spinal cord. Docin she saved the world, He
Speaker 2: saved this child. Finally, other people, including the dog's owner,
Speaker 2: Max Vohene, who had been bitten by the same dog
Speaker 2: as Meister and on the same day, and who were
Speaker 2: neither quarterized nor treated by pastor Or, continued in good health.
Speaker 2: He didn't have anything, he didn't have any treatments.
Speaker 1: He was fine too.
Speaker 2: Thus we see that this first much vaunted case of
Speaker 2: pasturing and success has no more to be said of it,
Speaker 2: for it, when examined carefully, than that of Joseph Meister,
Speaker 2: as far as his history is known, does not appear
Speaker 2: to have come off better or worse through Pastor's treatment
Speaker 2: than several others who went without it. But all were
Speaker 2: not but all were not so fortunate as young Joseph.
Speaker 2: Another child, Matthew Vidal, inoculated by pasture and supposedly cured,
Speaker 2: died seven months after treatment. Why because he was poisoned
Speaker 2: for ten days straight.
Speaker 1: To excuse the.
Speaker 2: Death of again another child, Louis Peltier, this is another
Speaker 2: child Louis Peltier. Failure was attributed to the bites being
Speaker 2: on the head and too much time having e collapse
Speaker 2: after the bite, before the inoculation.
Speaker 1: Yes, there's always an excuse you can use. And people
Speaker 1: would just be like.
Speaker 2: Oh, I didn't consider that because I'm not as smart
Speaker 2: as you, because you must be smarter than me. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Pastor had previously claimed that his treatment would be successful
Speaker 2: if commenced at any time before hydrophobia set in. Even
Speaker 2: after a year or more, contradictions seemed to have been
Speaker 2: of no account when needed as excuses, So much so
Speaker 2: that an American doctor, Dulas of Philadelphia, has said that
Speaker 2: on placing pastor's statements side by side, the acceptance of
Speaker 2: almost any one demands.
Speaker 1: On the obliteration of the others.
Speaker 2: Doctor Charles Bell Taylor, in the National Review of July
Speaker 2: eighteen ninety gave a list of cases in which pastors
Speaker 2: patients had died while the dogs that had bitten them
Speaker 2: remained healthy.
Speaker 1: Oh gee, how do you account for that, buddy? The
Speaker 1: animals were fine. The animals were healthy. See that's the problem.
Speaker 2: That's why they knew they had to start killing animals
Speaker 2: in the moment they bit somebody, so they couldn't see
Speaker 2: the error in their in their in their observations, and
Speaker 2: the bullshit that they've been spraying.
Speaker 1: See that right there. This was a lesson that they
Speaker 1: took to continue the fraud.
Speaker 2: Cases in which pastors patients had died because of his treatment.
Speaker 2: Is the is the deduction there while the other while
Speaker 2: the dogs that had bitten them remain healthy. A notable
Speaker 2: failure was that of a French postman named Pierre Rascal
Speaker 2: like my cat, except not spelled the same, who, along
Speaker 2: with another man, was attacked by a dog supposed to
Speaker 2: be mad.
Speaker 1: Supposed to be mad.
Speaker 2: He was not actually bitten, for the dog's teeth did
Speaker 2: not penetrate his clothing, but his his companion received severe bites.
Speaker 2: Now let's make sure we get all these details here.
Speaker 2: He was not actually bitten, for the dog's teeth did
Speaker 2: not penetrate his clothing, but his companion received many bites.
Speaker 2: Postman getting attacked by dogs. The latter refused to go
Speaker 2: to the pasture institute. The guy with all the bites
Speaker 2: would not go to the pastor institute and remained in
Speaker 2: perfect health. But unfortunate Rascal was forced by the postal
Speaker 2: authority so under go to the treatment. So why the
Speaker 2: guy who was all bit up wasn't forced to go
Speaker 2: to the treatment?
Speaker 1: Does that make any sense? And forced forced or what?
Speaker 1: You lose your job? Yeah? Stick the middle finger at him,
Speaker 1: says peace of out.
Speaker 2: Was forced to be to buy the postal authorities to
Speaker 2: undergo the treatment, which he did from the ninth to
Speaker 2: the fourteenth of March. On the following twelfth of April,
Speaker 2: severe sentums set in with pain at the point of inoculation.
Speaker 2: Oh boy, not at the points of the bite, but
Speaker 2: of the inoculation. I wonder if there was something to that.
Speaker 2: Not at the place of a bite, for remember that
Speaker 2: he had never been bitten. On the fourteenth of April,
Speaker 2: he died of paralytic hydrophobia caused by the inoculations. Same
Speaker 2: thing that is doing to the rabbits, because you're poisoning them.
Speaker 2: The new disease brought into the world by Pasture. Right,
Speaker 2: they've died of paralytic hydrophobia, The new disease brought into
Speaker 2: the world by past dure. Little wonder that, Yeah, remember paralytic?
Speaker 2: What's polio? How many polio shots caused polio? Could there
Speaker 2: be something to this? Little wonder that Professor Mitchell Peter complained,
Speaker 2: Or maybe it's Michelle Peter. Pasture does not cure hydrophobia,
Speaker 2: he gives it. Let me say that from one of
Speaker 2: his contemporaries. Little wonder that Professor Michelle Peter not some
Speaker 2: dude on the street, now, some guy reading newspaper. No,
Speaker 2: the guy is a professor Michelle Peter complained. Pastor does
Speaker 2: not cure hydrophobia. He gives it already in his own day.
Speaker 2: There were many unbelievers in his method because it was bullshit.
Speaker 2: But they didn't understand. You see, everybody went locked to
Speaker 2: that once they realized this is this was to make
Speaker 2: money and to conduct eugenics for the sake of Almighty Almighty?
Speaker 1: What do you call it? Not anything? It was goddamn
Speaker 1: name Now, ah, theory of evolution? Why the hell is
Speaker 1: am I losing?
Speaker 2: I might lose my brain because I'm tired, Darwin Jesus
Speaker 2: Christ all right, already in his own day there were
Speaker 2: many unbelievers in this method. To these In the London
Speaker 2: Lancet of the fifteenth of May eighteen eighty six, the
Speaker 2: following cause caution was addressed by doctor G. H. Brandt,
Speaker 2: event evidently a sincere believer in the words and works
Speaker 2: of Pasture. Now, while we're reading this, and you see
Speaker 2: what the state of the medical allopathic BS system that
Speaker 2: we're in that continues to poison and murder us slowly
Speaker 2: or rapidly. Who better, who knows nutrition is the key
Speaker 2: to keeping you resistant to all those things? Who better
Speaker 2: to nominate than doctor Glidden and doctor Manzo. So make
Speaker 2: sure you take the time to do if you do
Speaker 2: anything else this week, can do that and then like
Speaker 2: support the show, because yeah, that could definitely help to
Speaker 2: the unbelievers. Mister Pastor says, wait time will reveal many
Speaker 2: facts connected with this question, and it is only by
Speaker 2: continual experience and constant observation, since carried on for a
Speaker 2: considerable time on hundreds of cases, that we shall be
Speaker 2: able to arrive at positive.
Speaker 1: And definitive results.
Speaker 2: That sounds off, looks scilientific that I don't like that
Speaker 2: many years have gone by since these words were written,
Speaker 2: and we find ourselves now in a position to study
Speaker 2: the experiences and observations for which earlier critics were told
Speaker 2: to be patient. The claim for past year of success
Speaker 2: is based upon the assertion that he reduced the death
Speaker 2: rate for hydrophobia from sixteen percent to one percent. But
Speaker 2: a Colonel Tillard has shown in a pathletic called Pastor
Speaker 2: and Rabies that the sixteen percent theory of death rate
Speaker 2: before Pastor brought in his supposed preventative must be ridiculously wrong,
Speaker 2: as the yearly average number of deaths for France up
Speaker 2: to them had not been more than thirty The number
Speaker 2: of bitten according to the sixteen percent estimates says Colonel
Speaker 2: Tillard would have been less than two hundred. But Pastor
Speaker 2: on the contrary, had one seven hundred and seventy eight
Speaker 2: patients during the year of eighteen eighty seven, which meant,
Speaker 2: according to this calculation, that over two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: have died that he had not gone, that had not
Speaker 2: gone to him. This is nothing short of an absurdity
Speaker 2: in view of the fact that the highest total deaths
Speaker 2: ever recorded for any year.
Speaker 1: Was sixty six. How to lifel statistics, if we.
Speaker 2: Turned from France to other countries, we find that in Zurich,
Speaker 2: for instance, two hundred and thirty three persons bitten by
Speaker 2: rabid animals in the period of forty two years. In
Speaker 2: the period of forty two years, only four died, two
Speaker 2: of whom were bitten in parts where preventive measures could
Speaker 2: not be adopted. In addition, went of Breslau treated one
Speaker 2: hundred and six persons bitten by mad animals between this
Speaker 2: assumption right because this is a quote mad animals between
Speaker 2: the year eighteen ten and eighteen twenty three.
Speaker 1: Of these two died.
Speaker 2: During the epidemic of rabies in Stockholm in eighteen twenty
Speaker 2: four one hundred and six bitten persons presented themselves as
Speaker 2: the Royal hospital of whom only one contracted hydrophobia. So
Speaker 2: rabies or malnutri mal nourished mad dogs because they're starving
Speaker 2: or have some other deficiency that's making them a little wickoo.
Speaker 2: Many more instances might be enumerated, for example, the gunpowder treatment,
Speaker 2: or they could be abused and they're just angry.
Speaker 1: Right, dogs do that too.
Speaker 2: Many more instances instances might be enumerated, for example, the
Speaker 2: gunpowder treatment formally carried out in the island of Haiti,
Speaker 2: where though dog bites were common, hydrophobia was practically unknown.
Speaker 2: Such results of prepastory and treatment surpassed the best boasts
Speaker 2: of pasture and upset the truth of the sixteenth to
Speaker 2: one percent reduction immortality. Even were the latter claim correct,
Speaker 2: it would merely be brought about by the huge multiplication
Speaker 2: of cases, a method of manipulation continually found in statistics,
Speaker 2: and which, as doctor Boucher or Bouchet of Paris points out,
Speaker 2: does not prevent deaths from hydrophobia increasing even in the
Speaker 2: as a percentage decreases. As to this increase, the facts
Speaker 2: speak only too painfully, and this is that.
Speaker 1: Whole that whole?
Speaker 2: Uh anomaly of not anomaly, but the phenomenon of when
Speaker 2: you test more, you with a test that doesn't test
Speaker 2: for anything, but you're so darn certain that you know
Speaker 2: what you're what you're doing, and what it's actually the
Speaker 2: results even mean that you say.
Speaker 1: Wow, there's an epidemic. Look at all this people that
Speaker 1: are positive.
Speaker 2: And then there's more of them, So then the percentage
Speaker 2: of people who die gets less when you apply your treatment,
Speaker 2: even though you're killing more.
Speaker 1: People with it. Isn't that nice? Isn't that great?
Speaker 2: So they were healthy people that you claim to have had,
Speaker 2: were positive for something, and then you killed them with
Speaker 2: your treatment, and you say, oh my god, look the themic.
Speaker 2: It's killing people. No, you're the epidemic. You're killing people.
Speaker 2: As to the increase, the facts speak only too painfully.
Speaker 2: Before past year's treatment, the average number of deaths per
Speaker 2: endum from hydrophobian France was thirty. After his treatment, yearly
Speaker 2: average number increased to forty five. The late professor Carlo
Speaker 2: Urata gave the annual average mortality from hydrophobia in Italy
Speaker 2: as being sixty five before the Pastorian treatment and complative
Speaker 2: that's increased to eighty five after the installation of nine
Speaker 2: anti Arabbitic institutes. We cannot therefore wonder at the criticism
Speaker 2: that he published in the Courier Delta Sera. The numerous
Speaker 2: cures quote unquote that are boasted of in our nine
Speaker 2: anti Rabbitic, anti Rabic, not Ribbtic, but they should be
Speaker 2: anti Erbbitic as well. Institutions in Italy are cures of
Speaker 2: bitten persons. Our cures a bit in persons in whom
Speaker 2: the rabies would never have developed even if they had
Speaker 2: not been subject to the anti Rabic Arabic inoculations. And
Speaker 2: the small number of failures represent precisely the number of
Speaker 2: those in whom the rabies had taken and who for
Speaker 2: that reason die after the inoculation, as they would have
Speaker 2: died without it.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that's true.
Speaker 2: I think they died because of the inacuration period the end,
Speaker 2: this is the mildist judgment that can be passed on
Speaker 2: the work of nine anti Arabic institutes, even if we
Speaker 2: might not unreasonably ask if some of the inoculated persons
Speaker 2: were not killed by the inoculations themselves.
Speaker 1: Thank you. As a comment on this, we can add
Speaker 1: that the National Anti.
Speaker 2: Vivid Section Society has collected a list of and twenty
Speaker 2: deaths after pastori and treatment between eighteen eighty five and
Speaker 2: nineteen oh one, and that the British Union for the
Speaker 2: Abolition of Vivitsection is making a further list which amounts
Speaker 2: already to nearly two thousand, and that every one of
Speaker 2: these deaths after treatment has been taken from the official
Speaker 2: returns of pastor intes. In regard to the statistical returns
Speaker 2: of these institutes, we will quote doctor George Wilson's summary
Speaker 2: in his reservation Memorandum of the Royal Commission on Vivisection.
Speaker 2: Pasture carefully screened his statistics after some untoward deaths had
Speaker 2: occurred during treatment or immediately after, by ruling that all
Speaker 2: deaths should be excluded.
Speaker 1: Listen to this. Listen this.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna start all over from the very beginning. Both
Speaker 2: Listen to the words say Pasture carefully screened his statistics.
Speaker 1: How to lie with statistics.
Speaker 2: He must have learned, you know, Gates read that book,
Speaker 2: and that person who authored that book must have been
Speaker 2: thinking of Pasture at the time. Pasture carefully screened his statistics,
Speaker 2: manipulated them as what that means after some untoward deaths
Speaker 2: had occurred during treatment or immediately after, by ruling that
Speaker 2: all deaths should be excluded from the statistical from the
Speaker 2: statistical returns which occurred either during treatment or within fifteen
Speaker 2: days of the last injection. What what do they say
Speaker 2: about the shots?
Speaker 1: You remember? Do you remember with COVID the whole fourteen
Speaker 1: day window.
Speaker 2: Oh, you're still considered unvaccinated until fourteen days later. So
Speaker 2: if you die within the first two weeks, then it's
Speaker 2: not because of the shot. Remember, it's because of whatever
Speaker 2: you thought, whatever they could say you had, and in
Speaker 2: that case it was out.
Speaker 1: It was COVID.
Speaker 2: So when they they when they stick a needle in
Speaker 2: you and you start convulsing and you drop to the
Speaker 2: floor the anaphlectic shot and die, it's because of COVID
Speaker 2: responding bitterly at that injection, because it's so much goodness
Speaker 2: in that shot, in that needle that it just can't
Speaker 2: you can't handle it, and it fights vigorously like the
Speaker 2: demon that it is that's not really there. Uh huh, sure, No,
Speaker 2: it's because you poison the son of a bitch and
Speaker 2: killed him. It is in accordance with this most extraordinary
Speaker 2: rule that the percentage of deaths in all pasture institutes
Speaker 2: works out at.
Speaker 1: Reading two words.
Speaker 2: At the same time, it is in accordance with this
Speaker 2: most extraordinary rule that the percentage of deaths in all
Speaker 2: pastor institutes works out at such a low figure. Thus
Speaker 2: in right, because he manipulated it took weight all the deaths.
Speaker 2: Thus in the report on the Kazaldi Institute for nineteen ten,
Speaker 2: Major Harvey commences his comments on the statistics of the
Speaker 2: year as follows. And this year, twenty seventy three persons
Speaker 2: bit or licked or licked by rabbit or suspected rabbit
Speaker 2: animals retreated, yielding a percentage of failures of zero point
Speaker 2: one point nine. This percentage, Major Harvey explains in these words,
Speaker 2: there were twenty six deaths from hydrophobia. Of these, fourteen
Speaker 2: died during the treatment, eight within fifteen days of completion
Speaker 2: of treatment. Remember, these people aren't showing any symptoms, they've
Speaker 2: just been bitten, so then they start jamming these injections
Speaker 2: in them, and they killed fourteen of those people, or sorry,
Speaker 2: twenty six of those people. Of these fourteen died during
Speaker 2: the treatment, eight within fifteen days of completion.
Speaker 1: So this is what happens.
Speaker 2: You get sick and then they poison you, so you're
Speaker 2: already in a weakened state. It's amazing how more people
Speaker 2: don't die because of this. There's a testament to the
Speaker 2: vital force within you. Because when you're already on one
Speaker 2: knee and injured, they come over and they kick you
Speaker 2: in the balls and punch in the face.
Speaker 1: And then shoot you.
Speaker 2: Only the last four are are counted, So listen this,
Speaker 2: Only the last four arecounter that's failures of the treatment
Speaker 2: according to pastures definition of a failure, and it is
Speaker 2: on this number that the percentage failure rate is calculated.
Speaker 2: Because remember, the treatment wasn't finished yet the person died
Speaker 2: during it. So how can you say it's a treatment
Speaker 2: that failed because we didn't finish it. Isn't that some
Speaker 2: nice backward logic. How about you poisoned them for x
Speaker 2: amount of days and they died during it their pal.
Speaker 1: This screening of.
Speaker 2: Statistics prevents the inclusion of the death of the late
Speaker 2: King Alexander of Greece among the list of Pasturian failures.
Speaker 1: Killed the fucking king. Excuse me.
Speaker 2: The announcement was made after a monkey had bitten the king.
Speaker 2: The expert advice had been summoned from Paris. Oh, expert, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you're in good hands there pal. Had the king lived,
Speaker 2: no doubt a pean of victory would have proclaimed his
Speaker 2: rescue through Pastorian methods. As the king instead, unhappily grew worse.
Speaker 2: A discreet silence was for the most part observed as
Speaker 2: to his treatment. The truth, however, we learn in a
Speaker 2: bulletin received by the Greek legation in London and reported
Speaker 2: by the Daily Mail Athens Saturday, the king passed a
Speaker 2: critical night. His fever attained one hundred and five point
Speaker 2: six degrees fahrenheit and was preceded by severe shivering accompanied
Speaker 2: by a fit of delirium, which lasted one hour and
Speaker 2: a half. This morning, he was again vaccinated. What the
Speaker 2: hell His heart was weakened, his breathing is irregular. But
Speaker 2: we still don't understand that we're constantly making it worse
Speaker 2: by continuing to eject it with bullshit, blindness, blindness by
Speaker 2: smug people who think they know better. And you know,
Speaker 2: also the whole fraud aspect, and the fact that there
Speaker 2: are a bunch of sorcerers and freemasons and eugenicists euthanizing
Speaker 2: people with injections. As the king thus died during the
Speaker 2: course of treatment, we must apparently not only blame the monkey.
Speaker 2: Apparently we must apparently not only blame the monkey rather
Speaker 2: than the vaccination for his death, but must also not
Speaker 2: even count the latter as a failure of pastorin treatment, right,
Speaker 2: because he would die during treatment, right.
Speaker 1: So Oh no, it wasn't his fault because the treatment
Speaker 1: wasn't over yet. Oh boy.
Speaker 2: Another more recent case cannot be thus excluded from this category.
Speaker 2: Daily Mail the fourteenth of January nineteen twenty one reports
Speaker 2: a rare case of hydrophobia was revealed in Paris yesterday
Speaker 2: when Madame Gessler, a Dutch woman, died as a result
Speaker 2: of having been bitten by a mad dog eight months ago.
Speaker 1: Eight months ago.
Speaker 2: After the bite, Madame Gessler was immediately treated at a
Speaker 2: past institute and all together received twenty five injections of
Speaker 2: this freaking spinal cord cauldron of poison, which is brew.
Speaker 2: The excuse then follows that such cases of death after
Speaker 2: treatment are extremely rare. This announcement loses its force when
Speaker 2: we consider that many deaths like that of the late
Speaker 2: King of Greece are excluded by any arbitrary time limit,
Speaker 2: are excluded by an arbitrary time limit for being considered
Speaker 2: as failures. And this is exactly what they were doing
Speaker 2: right during COVID, the same shit. This is why we're
Speaker 2: looking at the source of this crap.
Speaker 1: This is Pastor.
Speaker 2: Pastor is the source of this. They haven't changed since
Speaker 2: his time. They're still pulling the same fraud because it
Speaker 2: keeps working. Our appealed to, though the science are are
Speaker 2: what is it called the intellectual inferiority complex. Hey, look,
Speaker 2: we can flash papers in front of you. It just
Speaker 2: means that we follow the line and indoctrinate ourselves on,
Speaker 2: you know, willfully to a cult of medicine. But that's
Speaker 2: impressive when you wear white coat and stethoscope. Apart from
Speaker 2: the so called accidents of treatment and apart from also deaths, wait,
Speaker 2: hold on, I want to read this one last time.
Speaker 2: The excuse then follows that such cases of death.
Speaker 1: After treatment are extremely rare.
Speaker 2: This is an announcement loses its force when we considered
Speaker 2: many deaths like that of King George are excluded by
Speaker 2: an arbitrary time limit for being considered as failures. Apart
Speaker 2: from the so called accidents of treatment, and apart also
Speaker 2: from deaths after treatment from whatever cause the treatment. An
Speaker 2: additional argument is because they're poisoned and just doing its
Speaker 2: thing throughout the body and it's freaking chimeric effect, that
Speaker 2: it's foreign tissues and ah, it's just stupid. An additional
Speaker 2: argument against Pastor's method is its introduction of a new disease,
Speaker 2: paralytic hydrophobia, right, paralyzing people. Gee, I wonder what happened
Speaker 2: with the polio again? Once again entirely different from the
Speaker 2: many forms of pseudo rabies.
Speaker 1: That means false.
Speaker 2: That this complaint is often wrongly attributed to other causes syphilis, alcoholism,
Speaker 2: or even influenza, and in other cases glossed over altogether
Speaker 2: is disclosed and report entitled Paralysis of Anti Rabies Treatment
Speaker 2: Yeah by doctor p Rimlinger, director of the Pastor Institute
Speaker 2: of Morocco, to the International Rabies Conference held at the
Speaker 2: Pastor Institute, Paris, April.
Speaker 1: Nineteen twenty seven.
Speaker 2: He writes, we were impressed with the discrepancy between the
Speaker 2: number of observations published by directors of institutes and the
Speaker 2: number of cases orly acknowledged by them to have occurred.
Speaker 2: Such occurrences were commonly kept seekert as if they were
Speaker 2: a reflection on the pastor method, or a reflection on
Speaker 2: the doctor who applied it. Such a policy appeared to
Speaker 2: us to be clumsy and the reverse of scientific. And
Speaker 2: again i'm pg.
Speaker 1: Eighty five.
Speaker 2: We have come to the conclusion that certain institutes conceal
Speaker 2: their cases. On various occasions. We have found in the
Speaker 2: medical literature observations concerning paralysis of treatment, and we have
Speaker 2: afterwards failed to find in the report the statistics of
Speaker 2: the institute's concerned any mention of these unfortunate cases. As
Speaker 2: far back as the first of January nineteen twenty, Pastorian
Speaker 2: statistics were criticized in the Times by no less an
Speaker 2: authority than the eminent statitician, Professor Carl Pearson, who known
Speaker 2: well known as the Galton Professor of Eugenics. Thet's start
Speaker 2: over now. As far back as the first of January
Speaker 2: nineteen twenty, pastorians man Wow Wow statistics were criticized in
Speaker 2: the Times by no less an authority than the imminent statistician,
Speaker 2: Professor Carl Pearson, well known as the Galton Professor of
Speaker 2: Eugenics and director of the Laboratory of National eugenics at
Speaker 2: the London University Why did they even have those? Again,
Speaker 2: questioning the boast of pastors conquest of hydrophobia, he wrote.
Speaker 1: Full.
Speaker 2: Statistical data for the pasture treatment, both in Europe and
Speaker 2: Asia are not available. What data are published permit no
Speaker 2: prudent statistical judgment. And if the Indian government is in
Speaker 2: possession of information on this point, why is it withheld?
Speaker 2: If it does not possess it, why does it not obtain?
Speaker 1: An issue?
Speaker 5: It?
Speaker 2: Is there any cause for dissatisfaction with the results obtained?
Speaker 2: And have any changes been made in the treatment on
Speaker 2: the basis of such dissatisfaction with the results obtained? And
Speaker 2: have any changes been made in the treatment on the
Speaker 2: basis of such dissatisfaction or for any other reason? These
Speaker 2: are the questions for which answers should be demanded in
Speaker 2: the House of Comments. No government is to be blamed
Speaker 2: for adopting a course recommended by its scientific advisors.
Speaker 1: But it sins.
Speaker 2: But it sends not only against science and humanity, but
Speaker 2: against the world as well if it does not provide
Speaker 2: the material it must possess for a judgment of the
Speaker 2: success or failure of its efforts. Given our present state,
Speaker 2: of knowledge. I venture to assert that it is not
Speaker 2: wise to speak yet of the conquest of rabies, Right yeah,
Speaker 2: conquest of unicorns. Such is the expert statistical commentary that,
Speaker 2: after all these years answers pastors request to await the verdict.
Speaker 1: Of time and experience.
Speaker 2: Even the information that attainable from the Pasture Institute can
Speaker 2: hardly be encouraging two believers in pastures treatment. For instance,
Speaker 2: if we turned to the reports of the Pasture Institute
Speaker 2: at Kaswali in India, we find a big increase from
Speaker 2: ten deaths from hydrophobia in nineteen hundred to seventy two
Speaker 2: deaths in nineteen fifteen. Against this, we can scarcely set
Speaker 2: the corresponding increase in cases because so many of the
Speaker 2: latter cannot be described as genuine. It is frankly acknowledged,
Speaker 2: right half these people probably didn't have anything. And then,
Speaker 2: by the way, none of them did. And here's the
Speaker 2: other problem with this. These aren't clean places. Other infections
Speaker 2: could occur in an open bite, but you're gonna call
Speaker 2: it all rabies or hydrophobia or whatever. And seventy two deaths,
Speaker 2: But that's limiting the deaths that happened during the treatment,
Speaker 2: So how many were there actually.
Speaker 1: Against this?
Speaker 2: We can scarcely set corresponding increase in cases, because so
Speaker 2: many of the latter cannot be described as genuine. It
Speaker 2: is frankly acknowledged in the sixteenth Annual Report that many
Speaker 2: of the Europeans have undergone no risk whatever, no risk,
Speaker 2: no risk of disease. We can well believe this when
Speaker 2: we recall the example of Lord and Lady Minto, who
Speaker 2: went through the course of inoculations merely because of their
Speaker 2: pet dog had been bitten by another dog.
Speaker 1: Supposed to have been mad. Whoa what.
Speaker 2: Their dog have been bitten by another dog is supposed
Speaker 2: to been mad, so they won't enter treatment. A large
Speaker 2: proportion of the Indians can run no risk either, except
Speaker 2: from the treatment, seeing that the patients, according to the
Speaker 2: report's own showing, have not all been bitten but mainly
Speaker 2: but many merely scratched or licked scratched, licked, and not
Speaker 2: all by rabid but many by merely suspected suspected animals.
Speaker 2: Suspected suspect you an animal. I think that's not what
Speaker 2: they mean. They mean suspected of having an imagine or
Speaker 2: unicorn inside them. Moreover, these animals included human beings, oh animals,
Speaker 2: including human beings bitten by somebody who's rapid I see
Speaker 2: kyle is, calves, pigs, deers, donkeys, elephants, and many other
Speaker 2: species known as they don't say anything about in squirrels.
Speaker 2: Between the years nineteen twelve and nineteen sixteen, there were
Speaker 2: one hundred and fourteen patients who had been bitten by
Speaker 2: horses and eighty who had been the victims of human bites.
Speaker 2: Thus we see that in the in a considerable number
Speaker 2: of so called cures, there is no pretension to the
Speaker 2: patients ever having run any risk from actual mad dog bites.
Speaker 2: In an interesting note, this sixteenth annued report recommends the
Speaker 2: use of atropine in cases which have developed symptoms of rabies.
Speaker 2: It goes on to say, the use of this drug
Speaker 2: was suggested to us by Major F. Norman White, who
Speaker 2: to whom we acknowledge our things. Its effect is to
Speaker 2: relieve throat spasm, and if it is given at suitable intervals,
Speaker 2: this distressing symptem can be entirely obliterated, with the result
Speaker 2: that the patient is able to eat and drink.
Speaker 1: Apart from this benefits.
Speaker 2: Apart from this beneficent effect, there is always in the
Speaker 2: background the hope that in certain cases, throat spasm, which
Speaker 2: is the approximate cause of death, might be held in
Speaker 2: check until the phase of recovery had set in. Clearly,
Speaker 2: the most hopeful cases would be those of the untreated,
Speaker 2: in which the incubation period was naturally all was naturally
Speaker 2: a long one. So here we find Pastorian workers themselves
Speaker 2: acknowledging a possible cure which has no connection with pasture,
Speaker 2: and further on and further on their own admission that
Speaker 2: it is quite possibly more profitable without the addition of
Speaker 2: this treatment. For the matter, I'm sorry for that matter.
Speaker 2: Hydrophobia has never been a complaint without a remedy, even
Speaker 2: after the proxysms have set in paroxidicisms, right.
Speaker 1: I guess uh.
Speaker 2: Pilocarpene a pilocarpine, a drug which induces profuse sweating, has
Speaker 2: been known to cure cases. While on a similar principle,
Speaker 2: Doctor Buisson of Peiri, author of a treatisey entitled Hydrophobia
Speaker 2: Preventative and Curative Measures, cured himself of an attack by
Speaker 2: the use of a vapor bath and inaugurated a remedial
Speaker 2: system named after himself, which has been most successful. It
Speaker 2: is to say at least it is to say the
Speaker 2: least of it remarkable that definite curative measures should be
Speaker 2: overlooked and set aside for a mirre preventative which cannot
Speaker 2: set forward a single tangible proof of ever having saved anyone.
Speaker 2: Shots are useless, and they're poisonous and they're deadly.
Speaker 1: That's what that says. While on the other hand, as we.
Speaker 2: Have seen, there is undeniable evidence that it has created
Speaker 2: a new complaint paralytic hydrophobia.
Speaker 1: Oh but that's okay. They'll come up with a shot
Speaker 1: with that too, for that too.
Speaker 2: For such a situation, there must be some explanation, and
Speaker 2: perhaps Indian paper the Pioneer on the twelfth of March
Speaker 2: nineteen nineteen unconsciously provided it. The Central Research Institute of
Speaker 2: Kriswally has developed its vaccine production to an almost incredible extent.
Speaker 5: Yay you.
Speaker 2: The yearly average before the war was eighteen thousand, five
Speaker 2: hundred kuepick scentimators.
Speaker 1: During the war it rose to over.
Speaker 2: Twenty two point five million cupc scentimator centimators and included
Speaker 2: anti typhoid, oh boy, more shots, cholera, pneumonia, and influenza
Speaker 2: vaccines shit that they just made up, gave it names,
Speaker 2: have no idea whether that there's a virus or what
Speaker 2: the hell causes it. Probably a bunch of maiolnutrition and
Speaker 2: other problems with toxins, but fuck it, let's just shoot
Speaker 2: somebody up with more poison. From a monetary point of
Speaker 2: view alone, the value of the Kostwally vaccines for the
Speaker 2: period of the war was about.
Speaker 1: Half a million sterling. Oh oh boy.
Speaker 2: Wave pastures and ooculations for hydrophobia form part of a
Speaker 2: vast money making system in which the beneficiaries have no
Speaker 2: wish that any items should be discredited. The Costwally returns
Speaker 2: are only a fraction of the monetary gain securing accruing
Speaker 2: in Europe, Asia and America. A few years back we
Speaker 2: were told by Professor Ray Lancaster that the Lister Institute
Speaker 2: in London made fifteen hundred pounds.
Speaker 1: Or is it lira?
Speaker 2: I think it's probably a year from the sale of
Speaker 2: vaccines and sarah, a sum that seems like lead to
Speaker 2: have increased largely. Thus we find science dominated by commercialism.
Speaker 2: Were it not for pecuniary advantages, there seems little doubt
Speaker 2: that the broth emulsions of spinal cords would have gone
Speaker 2: the same way as the older, less nauseous panacea the
Speaker 2: hair of the dog that bit you. Right, but that's
Speaker 2: kind of true, but not really. It has to present
Speaker 2: the same sentence if it's gonna be homeopathic.
Speaker 1: Right from the.
Speaker 2: Earliest record records of history, the prevalent mania seems to
Speaker 2: have been for frightfulness in medicinal memories. But the witch's
Speaker 2: culture in itself never have surpassed the toxic concoctions inaugurated
Speaker 2: by pasture. In what has truly proved to be sadly
Speaker 2: a new era in medicine. I was making those statements
Speaker 2: about it being a witch's culture, and then they just
Speaker 2: freaking came out and said it themselves. Right there, shots
Speaker 2: equals farmakia by far makiya, the all nations shall be deceived.
Speaker 2: And Masad says, by the way of deception, thou shalt
Speaker 2: do war. So by farmakiyah, thou shalt do war. It
Speaker 2: has been one hundred and twenty years.
Speaker 1: Now or more.
Speaker 2: It is the era of the injection into the blood
Speaker 2: of matter of varying degrees of offensiveness. The era Okay,
Speaker 2: let me read that again. It is the era of
Speaker 2: the injection into the blood of God. Damn it, now
Speaker 2: there's a butter on the fucking tam Anyway, it is
Speaker 2: the era of the injection into the blood of matter
Speaker 2: of varying degrees of offensiveness. The eerror in which animal
Speaker 2: experimentation vastly increased, has led to experiments on human beings,
Speaker 2: which we just went through in twenty twenty. And the
Speaker 2: credulous and but that's been going on forever too, and
Speaker 2: the credulous and uninformed are everywhere at the of the syringe,
Speaker 2: all because of the insatiable hunger of the pharmaceutical corporations
Speaker 2: for profit and domination of the health industry. Also, let's
Speaker 2: not forget that it's a system that actually values human
Speaker 2: misery and suffering and the depopulation. So money's nice keeps
Speaker 2: the other people doing all that killing for you. That's
Speaker 2: the incentive, is incentivization to not look too deep because hey,
Speaker 2: we're profiting too much, right, or you dare not speak
Speaker 2: a little bit because then that hurts you. A few
Speaker 2: examples of the cult in theory and in practice. Dunk
Speaker 2: da da, duh. I'm gonna get up for a second.
Speaker 2: I've got to do something else and then I hear
Speaker 2: something in the back. I'll be back in a moment.
Speaker 2: We'll go back to max for just a few and
Speaker 2: then you know how it goes. Yeah, making any make any,
Speaker 2: make any, make any Max. That's where is it, Chris Criss,
Speaker 2: except they destand at the max there you go, make
Speaker 2: you jump, jump.
Speaker 5: And bear in mind, seventy percent of the funding of
Speaker 5: this genocide comes from the United States of America. The
Speaker 5: bombs they're using to destroy Ghaza, the bombs they're using
Speaker 5: to destroy Lebanon, US weapons. When this really begins to
Speaker 5: sink in, you see what we're facing him. And in
Speaker 5: the last week, I've had power problems again, folks, a
Speaker 5: lot of noise. I've had power problems again. Had electricity
Speaker 5: went off yesterday again for twenty four hours. Just came
Speaker 5: back on a couple of hours ago. But in the
Speaker 5: last week we've seen Israel destroy the last hospital in Ghaza,
Speaker 5: the hospital in Jibellia.
Speaker 6: Second garment, second me in Horispital to dark Yeah, I did, yeah,
Speaker 6: but that minimal coming And I said that the ship
Speaker 6: while that came to because my d it said that
Speaker 6: such second nurse, What's I mean, what's on? How I
Speaker 6: see geenomy goes there.
Speaker 3: Not.
Speaker 5: They bombed the hospital, sheltered, left the patients in there,
Speaker 5: kidnapped all of the staff, took all of the medicine.
Speaker 5: So now you've got this bombed out hospital with walls,
Speaker 5: missing patients in there. You've got no doctors, no nurses,
Speaker 5: no medicines, no bandages, nothing, So just leaving the people
Speaker 5: there in the worst possible conditions and making sure they
Speaker 5: have no medical aid at all. They burnt the last
Speaker 5: school in Jubila as well, also bombed the youth center.
Speaker 4: Kah.
Speaker 1: I didn't go people get back, but I people mm
Speaker 1: hm hm and norma normoing one.
Speaker 5: They're kidnapping all the men in all the evacuees, which
Speaker 5: aren't evacuees. They're just expelling people from their homes and
Speaker 5: detonating homes. And half of the people haven't even been
Speaker 5: able to get out. As I showed you on the
Speaker 5: last video report, there's still three to four hundred thousand
Speaker 5: people trapped in their homes. They get shot at if
Speaker 5: they try to leave, and then Israeli forces come along
Speaker 5: and detonate the home with the people in it. Now,
Speaker 5: all these figures we hear forty five thousand people killed.
Speaker 5: And this figure hasn't gone up in the last six
Speaker 5: or seven months. Folks, they're still saying forty five thousand
Speaker 5: people killed. It's got to be up to a million
Speaker 5: or over a million have been killed by now.
Speaker 2: All right, we're back, gotage structure ouside, yes, daisy indeed
Speaker 2: click click A few examples of the cult in theory
Speaker 2: and in practice. With a striking contrast there was between
Speaker 2: Louis Pasteur, the worn, paralyzed man aged before his time,
Speaker 2: and the magnificent magnificence of the institute founded in his
Speaker 2: honor and named after him, which was opened on the
Speaker 2: fourteenth of November and eighteen eighty eight. In pairs, the
Speaker 2: ambitious chemist had achieved his goal fame and fortune. He
Speaker 2: was now installed as the idol of medical or orthodoxy.
Speaker 2: The reason for the general public's acclamation of his views
Speaker 2: has been succinctly explained by be Champ in the preface
Speaker 2: of La Thier do Microzeyima. Here he writes, the general public,
Speaker 2: however intelligent, are struck only by that which it takes
Speaker 2: little trouble to understand. They have been told that the
Speaker 2: interior of the body is something more or less like
Speaker 2: the contents of a vessel filled with wine. That it is,
Speaker 2: and that this interior is not injured. That we do
Speaker 2: not become ill except when germs originally created morbid penetrate
Speaker 2: into it from without, and then become microbes. The public
Speaker 2: do not know whether this is true. They do not
Speaker 2: even know what a microbe is, but they take it
Speaker 2: on the word of the master. They believe it because
Speaker 2: it is simple and easy to understand. They believe and
Speaker 2: they repeat that the microbe makes us ill without inquiring further,
Speaker 2: because they have not the leisure nor perhaps the capacity
Speaker 2: to probe.
Speaker 1: To the depths that which they are asked to believe.
Speaker 2: And again, like doctor Glynnon says, the idea here is
Speaker 2: that the body is a bag of random chemicals accident
Speaker 2: of nature, and it's up to the doctor to intervene.
Speaker 2: Because there's no innate wisdom, there's no vital force, there's
Speaker 2: no soul, there's no god, YadA YadA YadA, atheistic communistic.
Speaker 1: Soulness.
Speaker 2: On the other hand, experts have been educated from the
Speaker 2: start to consider micro organic life from the Pasturian standpoint
Speaker 2: and to accept these theories as though they were axioms.
Speaker 2: Thus it is perhaps understandable that it is only from
Speaker 2: man unbiased dvantage ground that the contradictions of the germ
Speaker 2: theory of disease can be correctly understood to.
Speaker 1: Be ridiculous its rule.
Speaker 2: The postulates of doctor Robert Koch state enter aliyah that
Speaker 2: a causative disease germs should be present in every case
Speaker 2: of a disease, and never found apart from it, what
Speaker 2: are the facts? One of the original props of pastoring
Speaker 2: orthodoxy that klebs Lafer basillis arraigned as the culprit behind diphtheria,
Speaker 2: was by Leafer himself, found to be absent in twenty
Speaker 2: five percent of the cases, while on the other hand,
Speaker 2: it is constantly revealed in the throats of healthy subjects.
Speaker 2: So it's part of you, it's part of what the
Speaker 2: microzyms make. Since, as be Schamp explained long ago, a
Speaker 2: bacterial evolution of microzymis is necessarily noxious. Is not necessarily noxious.
Speaker 2: A bacterial evolution of microzyme is not necessarily not just
Speaker 2: so it's fond in healthy people when they're healthy, and
Speaker 2: become morbid in the unhealthy, and then they say, oh,
Speaker 2: that's the disease from without that has entered. No, it's
Speaker 2: a change from within that has caused this, maybe by
Speaker 2: external forces such as toxins or malnutrition. Most certainly, the
Speaker 2: followers of pasture or however, have their method of overcoming
Speaker 2: the theoretic difficulty, namely the carrier theory by which they
Speaker 2: by which healthy people are accused of propagating certain germs
Speaker 2: which they then supposedly disseminate. This accusation has been brought
Speaker 2: against those who have never, in their entire lives suffered
Speaker 2: from the complaints that they are accused of distributing. While
Speaker 2: in one noited case that of a certain cook, Missus
Speaker 2: Roberts of Wrexham, whose microscopic inhabitants were said to have
Speaker 2: dealt out intestinal trouble, it was found that she had
Speaker 2: never seen, much less even touched the pork pies described
Speaker 2: as the delivery medium of her murderous microbes. In their
Speaker 2: Manual of Infectious Diseases, Goodall and Washburn state enteric fever
Speaker 2: differs from other infectious diseases and not spreading directly from
Speaker 2: individual to individual. There is thus little danger in visiting
Speaker 2: patients suffering from the disease contagion myth right there right,
Speaker 2: and this idea that you need to be afraid of
Speaker 2: other people because you're gonna get sick, Well, not true,
Speaker 2: not true.
Speaker 1: Yet, while actual.
Speaker 2: Victims of the fever are pronounced innocuous, no hesitation is
Speaker 2: shown in accusing healthy persons, some of whom who have
Speaker 2: some of whom have never undergone the complaint of being
Speaker 2: promoters and disseminators of it. Now, this book was written
Speaker 2: quite a while ago, and they still used that sames
Speaker 2: on us. You know you're you're fine, but yet you
Speaker 2: have to cover your face. You have to get these
Speaker 2: shots anyway. The carrier theory is also constantly invoked in
Speaker 2: connection with the diphtheria.
Speaker 1: Years ago we read of the throats of seven.
Speaker 2: Hundred sculptureleren that Apple Alperton in Middlesex being examined, with
Speaker 2: the result that two hundred were accused of being diphtheria
Speaker 2: carriers and were accordingly placed in isolation. See how badly
Speaker 2: this retardation affects human life. One telling weakness of the
Speaker 2: theory is that we never seem to hear of the
Speaker 2: isolation of prominent bacteriologists, who obviously should set the example
Speaker 2: in undergoing microscopic and chemical tests, as in the subsequent quarantine,
Speaker 2: which is apparently only advocated for the people. Right, they're
Speaker 2: the ones supposedly around it all the time, yet they
Speaker 2: don't quarantine. As the editor of The Lancet has confined,
Speaker 2: without the carrier theory, Cooke's postulates cannot even pretend to
Speaker 2: be fulfilled. Take for instance, Cooke's fourth postulate, which defines
Speaker 2: the causative germ as producing in the animal the same
Speaker 2: disease with which it was originally associated. But we are
Speaker 2: told in the same article in the Lancet how the
Speaker 2: new macaccus of pneumonia introduced into the lung of a
Speaker 2: rabbit brings about not pneumonia but instead general sept the sema.
Speaker 2: That's because they're injecting it and they're causing sepsis. Right,
Speaker 2: it's the injection. It's the it's the act of injecting
Speaker 2: foreign material into the whatever they're doing a rabbit. And
Speaker 2: they're like, oh, it's because we were right, there is
Speaker 2: something in this other thing that we just extract the
Speaker 2: crap out of because look at did this did this
Speaker 2: other thing to this other to this rabbit? No, you idiot,
Speaker 2: it's the act of unnatural injections that caused it. According
Speaker 2: to bay Schamp's theory, other parts of other people and
Speaker 2: other things aren't supposed to be sign you. According to
Speaker 2: bay Schamp's theory of the differences between the microzygners of
Speaker 2: varying species, this results. This result is understandable and presents
Speaker 2: no mystery, but it is the undoing of Cooke's fourth postulate.
Speaker 2: In Sternberg's Textbook of Bacteriology, we find the demonstrated made
Speaker 2: by Oxten, Rosenbach or Passett and others that micro micrococi
Speaker 2: are constantly present in the plus of acute diseases led
Speaker 2: to the inference that there can be no plus formation
Speaker 2: in the absence of microorganisms of this class, but it
Speaker 2: is not well established by the experiments of Crowetz, DeBerry, Steinhaus,
Speaker 2: and more words, Coffin and others that the inference was
Speaker 2: a mistaken one, and that certain chemical subs since is
Speaker 2: introduced beneath the skin give rise to pus formation quite
Speaker 2: independently of bacteria reaction to toxins in the body, expelling
Speaker 2: it out with the pus. On the other hand, doctor
Speaker 2: Robe rob has shown that under the most rigid antiseptic treatment,
Speaker 2: microorganisms are constantly found attached to structures when removed from
Speaker 2: wounds made by the surgeon, and that a skin abscess
Speaker 2: is frequently associated with the presence of the most common
Speaker 2: of these microorganisms e g. Staphococcus albus. Thus, on the
Speaker 2: one hand, we are given evidence that plus formation may
Speaker 2: be independent of bacteria, while on the other yetmost precautions
Speaker 2: against microorganisms will not prevent their presence. And when they're
Speaker 2: talking about field injuries like in the battle, they're like, oh,
Speaker 2: tuberculosis that's all over the place. And the way that
Speaker 2: was explained, it's the same as like when an apple
Speaker 2: falls sort of treats bruised. The bruising effect causes the
Speaker 2: onset of digestion or the rotting of the fruit right
Speaker 2: to make it into something else that is going to
Speaker 2: be repurposed for life in a different way. So the
Speaker 2: micro seima reacting to these horrific war wounds. The tuberculosis
Speaker 2: is an effect, but also can be brought on by
Speaker 2: heavy deadly toxins that are cytotoxic in nature, like AZT,
Speaker 2: like chemotherapy and all these things. Because a lot of
Speaker 2: the people who died of AIDS quote unquote AIDS, they
Speaker 2: said it was.
Speaker 1: Identical to tuberculosis. Gee, I wonder why that is.
Speaker 2: From the viewpoint of Pastor, this is a contradiction not
Speaker 2: easily accounted for by his theory of invasion. We are
Speaker 2: told by his son in law that it was his
Speaker 2: habit to speak of an invaded patient. Yet we have
Speaker 2: just been informed on the one hand of plus without
Speaker 2: any so called microbes, and on the other of micros
Speaker 2: when every precaution has been taken against them. This is
Speaker 2: very confusing, according to Pastor's teachings, right because some things
Speaker 2: are created from within by the microzyma, like everything. On
Speaker 2: the contrary, the matter is easily explained when we consider
Speaker 2: Bechamp's teachings according to his doctrine, which is which, in
Speaker 2: keeping with prudent approach to scientific investigation, he put forward
Speaker 2: as a probable hypothesis instead of asserting it to be
Speaker 2: a prude fact and fact and capable of question. It
Speaker 2: seems possible to understand the malignant influence of certain chemical
Speaker 2: substances upon the normal Microzymas you change their environment, they
Speaker 2: change of the microzymas of the body and the plus
Speaker 2: formation that might be the consequence. In the other example,
Speaker 2: by the way you can alter what the micro microzymes
Speaker 2: are doing through any type of signal. Different types of
Speaker 2: signals cause different things.
Speaker 1: And what do you think five g Wi Fi radio
Speaker 1: frequencies due to them?
Speaker 2: Right where micro organisms are because it all about vibration regardless,
Speaker 2: even if you're talking about a substance inside, do you
Speaker 2: that I think gives off gives off a frequency signature?
Speaker 2: So it's really about signals, all right?
Speaker 1: Where was at? Where?
Speaker 2: See? In which other example of microisms are I think
Speaker 2: we already pass someone? Nope, no, okay, we're right here.
Speaker 2: In the other example where microorganisms are seen in spite
Speaker 2: of the anti subic precautions against external evasion, we are
Speaker 2: showing the apparent accuracy of Baseon's view that the medium
Speaker 2: having become unsuited to normal microzyme as they themselves develop
Speaker 2: into bacteria, thus proving the latter to be the consequence
Speaker 2: instead of their origin, of the disease condition. Another remarkable
Speaker 2: theory that has had to be invoked in support of
Speaker 2: the general germ theory is that of mechen coughs uh phagocytosis,
Speaker 2: or the assumption that the leucocytes, the white corpuscles of
Speaker 2: the blood are in effect it's scavengers which destroy undesirable intruders.
Speaker 1: A favorite description.
Speaker 2: Of them has been that of the police of the body,
Speaker 2: notwithstanding the salient fact that the more of them there are,
Speaker 2: the less the body seems safeguarded, while the game while
Speaker 2: it gains insecurity with the diminution of this hypothetical police force.
Speaker 2: So they're only produce when they're necessary. Is that what
Speaker 2: they're saying because they're being attacked. Bishop taught that the
Speaker 2: leukocytes are living, but has but he disagreed with me
Speaker 2: chop mechen Coff's theory. He wrote in Les Grand's Problem
Speaker 2: Medico the leucocytes are even held to be so much
Speaker 2: alive that they are represented as pursuing the microbes to
Speaker 2: swallow and devour them.
Speaker 1: The droll thing is that this is believed.
Speaker 2: But without phatiosytosis, what would become of the whole doctrine
Speaker 2: of invasion and resistance and all other popular theories. One
Speaker 2: likely reason for the popularity of the germ theory of
Speaker 2: disease has been the explanation that it has been supposed
Speaker 2: to be supposed to provide for the problem of infection.
Speaker 2: It is so easy to conjure up a rays of
Speaker 2: malignant micros passing from one disease subject to another. Such
Speaker 2: an idea has become prevalent even among men of science.
Speaker 2: Well that's everything right now. For instance, we find that
Speaker 2: before a Royal Commission on visitess Section, doctor C. J.
Speaker 2: Martin of the Lister Institute is reported to have stated
Speaker 2: his and meeting Pasteur's experience on the subject fermentation led
Speaker 2: him to Pastor didn't have experienced in fermentation. He stole
Speaker 2: that shit from base up and then altered it. Led
Speaker 2: him to the great generalization that infectious diseases might themselves
Speaker 2: be interpreted as interpreted as particular fermentations and as due
Speaker 2: to specific microorganisms. By a series of masterly experiments on animals,
Speaker 2: he established the truth of his hypothesis in the case
Speaker 2: of anthrax, chickenoiden, chicken colera, and swine.
Speaker 1: URIs whatever the hell that is.
Speaker 2: These results of Pasture may be regarded as the foundation
Speaker 2: of the whole modern study of contagious diseases in both
Speaker 2: man and animals, and their extension by Pasture and his
Speaker 2: pupils and by bacteriologists and pathologists all over the civilized world,
Speaker 2: has led to the discovery of the causes of most.
Speaker 1: Of the infectious diseases in which man is liable.
Speaker 2: They've already compared base shops and pastors work on fermentation,
Speaker 2: and in regard to pastures masterly experiments on animals, we
Speaker 2: have seen something of the truth of this hypothesis in
Speaker 2: the case of, for instance, of anthrax. We'll go back
Speaker 2: to that and look at the anthrax one. Finally, in
Speaker 2: respect of the most infectious diseases such a scarlet such
Speaker 2: as scarlet fever, measles, and smallpox, no specific specific microorganisms
Speaker 2: are found in association, though that does not stop pastures
Speaker 2: followers from claiming that they are there all the same,
Speaker 2: but our ultra microscopic even if this is hardly in
Speaker 2: accord with the cautiousness advocated by pasture, As Professor bays
Speaker 2: Chomp once said, if virulent germs were normal in the atmosphere,
Speaker 2: how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently
Speaker 2: by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus. There would
Speaker 2: not be a wound, however, slight the prick even of
Speaker 2: a pen that would not be the occasion for infection
Speaker 2: with occasion for infecting us with smallpox typhus syphilis ganrhea.
Speaker 2: In regard to this, we will note we will quote
Speaker 2: a passage from mister Alexander Paul's summary of the preface
Speaker 2: of Laterity Do Microzyma.
Speaker 1: Mister Paul writes MBA.
Speaker 2: Schamp argues that if the simple or evolved microzymas which
Speaker 2: may be found in certain humors of the body, came
Speaker 2: from the air and penetrated so easily the cells of
Speaker 2: the human body, there is one humor in ceaseless contact
Speaker 2: with the air we breathe, in which we should find
Speaker 2: them always the same in all animals.
Speaker 1: This is the saliva of the mouth.
Speaker 2: It is found, however, that the properties of human saliva
Speaker 2: and that of other animals are different. MBI. Shamp says
Speaker 2: that the epithelial cells, the microzymas, and the bacteria of
Speaker 2: the tongue of man may have a certain chemical action
Speaker 2: unique to it, to themselves, and altogether different from those
Speaker 2: of the tongue of the cow paying the horse of
Speaker 2: the dog. Now, if the germs of the air not
Speaker 2: operate to modify the function of a humor which is
Speaker 2: so unceasingly, so largely, and so directly in contact with
Speaker 2: the common air, it is difficult to understand how they
Speaker 2: operate to modify the functions of the inner tissues and humors,
Speaker 2: protected as they.
Speaker 1: Are by so many barriers.
Speaker 2: Were it not that the art of thinking is so
Speaker 2: rarely practiced Reflections like that, Reflections such as these should
Speaker 2: have established long ago something to be at fault with
Speaker 2: the Pastorian notion of the germ theory. And even in
Speaker 2: cases where the germ hunters seem sure of this microbe
Speaker 2: in a little while, dire confusion is apt to overtake
Speaker 2: his certainty. Never, for instance, did there seem to be
Speaker 2: a better bolstered case than Sir David Bruce's arraignment of
Speaker 2: the micro Micrococcus molitanus. There you go, micrococcus lightness in
Speaker 2: goat's milk as a cause.
Speaker 1: Of multi fever. Yet when doctor Walter R. Had When
Speaker 1: of Gloucester took up the.
Speaker 2: Defense, he proved that supposed that he approved the supposed
Speaker 2: offending germ to be innocent. So, yeah, germ's not always bad, right,
Speaker 2: Sometimes they just killed the toxes, he toxins. They're just
Speaker 2: there to do their job to be innocent. After all,
Speaker 2: The decline of the fever in the Navy was found
Speaker 2: to have had nothing to do with the abstinence from
Speaker 2: goat's milk, but to have been gradual and to have
Speaker 2: coincided with the dredging of the harbor at Malta. Neither
Speaker 2: was the sudden drop and army disease reared Army disease
Speaker 2: rate to be accountaphor by the avoidance of the milk,
Speaker 2: who had already taken place before the beverage was banned,
Speaker 2: when the troops were mostly removed from the insanitary Saint
Speaker 2: Emo Barracks to new quarters at a higher altitude. To
Speaker 2: these measures, the improvement in our sailors and soldier's health
Speaker 2: was clearly traced by doctor Hadwin's investigations, and the main
Speaker 2: effect of the Micrococcus maliteness was to gain a knighthood
Speaker 2: for its false accuser. Well, incidentally, it occasioned a great
Speaker 2: deal of discontent. Oh sorry, I mean, you could pronounce
Speaker 2: it that way, but that's wrong, A great deal of
Speaker 2: discontent among the Maltese population connected with the milk industry. Right,
Speaker 2: they blamed the milk and then here we go. That
Speaker 2: goes right in the pasturization and imagination again. But whatever
Speaker 2: destroying the actual good properties of the milk, so then
Speaker 2: you're really left with dogshit to drink.
Speaker 1: Doctor Aegis of Malta, who at the.
Speaker 2: Time went into the matter very thoroughly, found that bad
Speaker 2: sanitation was invariably the cause of outbreaks of fever in
Speaker 2: private houses, which were sometimes the quarters of British officers.
Speaker 2: On one occasion it was only after a floor had
Speaker 2: been taken up that the real cause of the trouble
Speaker 2: was discovered. I'm guessing black mold or some other type
Speaker 2: of fungus. Yet upon a theory so constantly at fault,
Speaker 2: when thoroughly examined, there has been erected an entire system
Speaker 2: of inoculation, or perhaps the brute facts that may be stated. Conversely,
Speaker 2: had it not been for the sale of sarah and
Speaker 2: vaccines nowadays grown to such vast proportions pastures, germ theory
Speaker 2: of disease might before this have collapsed into well deserved obscurity.
Speaker 2: It can hardly be denied that he committed an offense
Speaker 2: in dragging medicine medical science down to a commercial level. Moreover,
Speaker 2: he has besmirched the name of science by associating it
Speaker 2: with cruelty. In this also, he was merely an imitator.
Speaker 2: He was the friend of men like Claude Bernard, who,
Speaker 2: in the words of Professor Mettenkough, feel no scruples in
Speaker 2: opening bodies and submitting the animals to the most cruel sufferings,
Speaker 2: but atrocious as as is their torment. Victims of the
Speaker 2: knife were and are few in number compared with the
Speaker 2: millions of animals that suffer in pathological laboratories, sometimes undergoing
Speaker 2: tests as fantastic and misleading as they are cruel, since
Speaker 2: they can never furnish real evidence of disease under natural conditions,
Speaker 2: as examples might be yea natural conditions, and injecting something
Speaker 2: into somebody or something isn't a natural condition doesn't happen naturally,
Speaker 2: it has to be done by some psychopath with a
Speaker 2: freaking syringe. As examples might be mentioned, birds and rats
Speaker 2: kept in cramped cages slowly devoured by fleas so that
Speaker 2: some scientists look at this, this is the same goddamn
Speaker 2: thing that the freaking uh the Fauci was doing with
Speaker 2: the dogs slowly devoured by fleas, so that some scientists
Speaker 2: can deduce whether the fleas convey sleeping sickness, without regard
Speaker 2: to the fact that the inevitable bad health of the creatures.
Speaker 2: Thus tormented cannot with certainty guarantee anything other than the
Speaker 2: callousness of their tormentors. Or again, the test of milk,
Speaker 2: by its injection into guinea pigs which kept in covered tins,
Speaker 2: would by the mere fact of such unhealthy captivity, be
Speaker 2: made liable to tuberculosis. Yet for this the rate payer
Speaker 2: dips into his pocket, while for all he can tell,
Speaker 2: the milk he consumings may have come from a consumptive
Speaker 2: cow wading through a filthy farmland and milked by a
Speaker 2: diseased individual into a dirty utensil. Hygienists in some part
Speaker 2: such conditions, leaving pastorians to torment their guinea pigs. The
Speaker 2: amount of harm that has ensued from the diversion of
Speaker 2: attention from real to false factors in the causation of
Speaker 2: ill health is probably incalculable. An example in this connection
Speaker 2: with regard to plague in India is the amount of
Speaker 2: time and money wasted over fleas and rats that might
Speaker 2: be expended upon the insanitary huts standing on filth trodden soil,
Speaker 2: which doctor Charles and Crichton and the treatisy on the
Speaker 2: subject has clearly shown to be breeding grounds of the
Speaker 2: pestial on the same thing happened here. During what they
Speaker 2: called in the Industrial Revolution, people were living without least disposal,
Speaker 2: as in bathroom disposal, drinking dirty water, and then they
Speaker 2: have these outbreaks of smallpox and typhis and the theory.
Speaker 2: And then they never had those problems when they were
Speaker 2: living on the land as farmers. But when they all
Speaker 2: got pushed into the city and sort of working industry,
Speaker 2: then everybody started getting sick and they were living in
Speaker 2: piles of their own filth. What a great life to
Speaker 2: demoralize the soul and cause heartache and torment to your family.
Speaker 2: To return to the subject of milk, admirers of Pastor
Speaker 2: may point in pride to the preservative method named after him,
Speaker 2: But even here the praise is so faint as to
Speaker 2: be damning. If we turn to the Journal of the
Speaker 2: Royal Society of Arts for September nineteenth, nineteen nineteen, we
Speaker 2: find an article entitled Problems of Food and our Economic
Speaker 2: Policy by Professor Henry E.
Speaker 1: Armstrong.
Speaker 2: Here we are told that the great reformer of recent
Speaker 2: times has been the chemist Pasture. The extent to which
Speaker 2: he has influenced our doings is astounding. Professor Armstrong then
Speaker 2: shows how thanks to pasture, wines were sterilized, and the
Speaker 2: grand vin, the result of a fortuitous conquerurse of organisms,
Speaker 2: became a great rarity. The equality of the wine was
Speaker 2: reduced to a low general average, Though the course much
Speaker 2: was saved from the sewer. Beer suffered a like fate.
Speaker 2: Though on the whole the changes were much to the
Speaker 2: public advantage, but the real harm was done when milk
Speaker 2: was tampered with.
Speaker 1: Dilution became a general practice.
Speaker 2: The public suffered from occasional dishonest tradesmen, and was in
Speaker 2: some instances deprived of the advantages up till then derived
Speaker 2: from dealing with the majority of purveyors who were honest.
Speaker 2: The blow was made all the heavier by the introduction
Speaker 2: of new engineering techniques for the separation of the cream.
Speaker 2: Then pastures teachings became operative once more, aided this time
Speaker 2: by coke.
Speaker 1: Milk was not only diluted but also sterilized.
Speaker 2: Some lives may have been saved, but the step has
Speaker 2: undoubtedly been productive of untold misery. Not a few of
Speaker 2: us have long held, on general grounds that the material
Speaker 2: produced as milk is I think that is as extra
Speaker 2: as milk cannot be heated above blood heat without diminishing
Speaker 2: its dietary value. Recent observations show indeed that the anti
Speaker 2: uh screbutic AD event, which is none too abundant and consistent,
Speaker 2: is effected, although apparently the fat syable anti rakitic and
Speaker 2: water syable anti neuric factors are not destroyed. But difficulties
Speaker 2: have been encountered in localities where the milk supply has
Speaker 2: been systematically sterilized, and it may well be that it
Speaker 2: suffers in quality in ways not yet elucidated. The inquiries
Speaker 2: thus far held into the into the effect Remember who
Speaker 2: was pushing for sterilization, pasteurization Rothschild's because they were just
Speaker 2: so concerned about human life, the human life that they hate.
Speaker 2: The inquiries thus far into the effect of sterilizing sterilizing
Speaker 2: are in no way satisfactory and are open to criticism
Speaker 2: on account of their incompleteness and unsanity character. The risks
Speaker 2: from typhoid and other similar infections are now slight, and
Speaker 2: the main object of sterilizing milk is to secure the
Speaker 2: destruction of To secure the destruction of the organism which
Speaker 2: is held to be responsible for tubercular disease.
Speaker 1: That's not what does it.
Speaker 2: But it may well be that in destroying some one
Speaker 2: or other mysterious constituent of the adamant class, the food
Speaker 2: value is so lowered that effects are produced which render
Speaker 2: the system especially sensitive to tubercular infection. Does the exact
Speaker 2: thing they didn't want to do, right, Such infection seems
Speaker 2: always to be with us to oh apart from milk. Moreover,
Speaker 2: when milk is sterilized, the lactic organism is destroyed, and
Speaker 2: it becomes a particularly favorable nitis for the growth of
Speaker 2: future faction organisms. It is therefore a potent cause of
Speaker 2: infantile diarrhea.
Speaker 1: Oh look at that.
Speaker 2: When you pasteurize things, they decide to go bad quicker,
Speaker 2: maybe because there's a positive living element to the milk
Speaker 2: that is killed off and that would spark the microzymas
Speaker 2: to do something inside of it.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: Thus, the verdict of time and unbiased criticism continue to
Speaker 2: produce judgment on the works of pasture. But if the
Speaker 2: mere consumption of impoverished food can be believed to be
Speaker 2: so injurious to the consumer, or what must be the
Speaker 2: effect of the deluge of sarah and blood and vaccines
Speaker 2: introduced directly into the bloodstream. In spite of the modern
Speaker 2: medical mania for inoculations, a remarkable ignorance on the subject
Speaker 2: prevails among those most ready to submit to inoculation. Many
Speaker 2: cannot even distinguish between a serum and a vaccine. Anything
Speaker 2: that's injected into you is freaking wrong.
Speaker 1: A vaccine.
Speaker 2: That's not a magic word that makes things better, And
Speaker 2: people like, it's not a vaccine, it's gene therapy.
Speaker 1: Who the fuck cares you?
Speaker 2: Injecting something in yourself that's not natural is going to
Speaker 2: cause problems.
Speaker 1: I don't care what the hell you call it. Serum
Speaker 1: the color is part of the blood is.
Speaker 2: Usually for use in inoculation, taken from the blood of
Speaker 2: a horse into which disease matters have previously been injected.
Speaker 1: Lovely happy horse.
Speaker 2: I'm sure the strength of this serum is generally tested
Speaker 2: upon guinea pigs, that is to say, by their recovery
Speaker 2: or death from the sickness created by its injection into
Speaker 2: their bodies.
Speaker 1: Animals didn't even know if they've infected it.
Speaker 2: But injecting anything into them is going to cause them ailment,
Speaker 2: and then they're going to inject something else in them
Speaker 2: and be like eah, looks better. Animals suffering into animal
Speaker 2: suffering comes into play in this connection from start to finish.
Speaker 2: While as regards to the human race, considering the danger
Speaker 2: of the introduction of the serum of one species into
Speaker 2: that of another, it is perhaps fortunate that serum therapy,
Speaker 2: although originally a claim aimed as the panacea of all ills,
Speaker 2: has yielded in popularity to vaccine therapy. Oh that's much wonderful,
Speaker 2: all right. Hey, one poison is more I don't know
Speaker 2: what's the word effective than the other. The latter, needless
Speaker 2: to say, has no connection with cows under pastures tutelage,
Speaker 2: precision and nomenclature was as much lost as precision in theories.
Speaker 2: The name vaccine does now applied to microorganisms and their
Speaker 2: surrounding medium attracted from a sick body, the organisms being
Speaker 2: left to multiply in a suitable nutritive subsistence known as
Speaker 2: a culture, afterwards being usually killed by heat and preparations
Speaker 2: in various ways poisons. According to prevalent fashion, The nostrum
Speaker 2: is finally sold as a cure or more often preventative,
Speaker 2: against the disease with which the microorganisms were originally associated.
Speaker 2: In this case, animals are spared a part of a
Speaker 2: part in the preparation, though owing to their use as
Speaker 2: test subjects, suffering is for them by no means prevented.
Speaker 2: We are here reminded of the homeopathic law of cure
Speaker 2: that like cures like, though what a contrast is presented
Speaker 2: at represented the Heneman scientific precision and allowing for individual idiosyncrasies,
Speaker 2: whereas he applied his drugs by way of Nature's laboratory
Speaker 2: the stomach. The Pastorian system, on the contrary, introduces substances
Speaker 2: directly into the blood, regardless of Nature's precaution i e.
Speaker 2: The efficient coverings with which she has protected this life
Speaker 2: stream against all external intrusions.
Speaker 1: Dadda.
Speaker 2: You don't inject something into yourself or let somebody else
Speaker 2: do it. List you have a death wish or they
Speaker 2: have a murder wish. It has indeed become the fashion
Speaker 2: for humanity to consider itself wiser than choose which name
Speaker 2: you will Nature or Providence. We are well aware of
Speaker 2: the array of statistics. Yeah, well, first you have to degrade,
Speaker 2: and you have to condition the public to thinking through
Speaker 2: things like evolution that you were mistaken. Science has taught
Speaker 2: us that there's no God that there is no creator,
Speaker 2: and what's that leave you? Chaos and random bags of
Speaker 2: chemicals walking around and fear of death constantly.
Speaker 1: And these people are giving you solutions.
Speaker 2: At least, they're providing you a lie in which to
Speaker 2: keep your self preservation going longer, because there's nothing but
Speaker 2: this and life is an accident, so let's keep it
Speaker 2: going as long as we can. And they're not even
Speaker 2: doing that. They're ending them quickly because they're poisoning you.
Speaker 2: And this this is the indication right here too, that
Speaker 2: one is natural, one is not. And if you think
Speaker 2: you're going to fix a natural body in an unnatural way,
Speaker 2: I don't think you understand what terms mean. Follow the
Speaker 2: follow the instructions to assemble, right, You don't take directions
Speaker 2: from some other thing and try to put together a
Speaker 2: completely different object. We are well aware of the array
Speaker 2: of statistics with which pastorians confront the critics of the
Speaker 2: system of inoculation, and reply, we would say that statistics
Speaker 2: are worthless improving results without full investigation and thorough allowance
Speaker 2: for the specific conditions from which they are derived. Right, Oh,
Speaker 2: let's eliminate all the deaths. That way it looks better.
Speaker 2: For instance, it is easy to parade. Oh, by the way,
Speaker 2: that's how that's another reason why virus is completely inaccurate,
Speaker 2: because they had that fourteen day window. For instance, it
Speaker 2: is easy to parade a fall in the diph theory
Speaker 2: of fatality rates and by the way, also suppression by
Speaker 2: the doctors because they're not going to purport it for you.
Speaker 2: It is easy to parade a fall in diphtheria of
Speaker 2: fatality rate since the introduction of anti toxin. Yet that
Speaker 2: fall does not confirm the merits of the serum if
Speaker 2: it is seen merely to be the result of a
Speaker 2: case of a case rate inflated by a bacteriological as
Speaker 2: opposed to a clinical diagnosis, and the inclusion inclusion as
Speaker 2: diphtheria of cases which in the past would have been
Speaker 2: considered to be merely sore throat consulis laryngitis. Right, So
Speaker 2: then when you have those symptoms of a certain thing,
Speaker 2: everything is that thing. Now these are all just words,
Speaker 2: This is all sorcery, This is all spell casting. So
Speaker 2: when you name something, this disease, you give it a name,
Speaker 2: and everybody's scared. So now everybody has a sore throat.
Speaker 2: They never would considered it being a problem before, but
Speaker 2: now they've been told that there's a thinc floating around
Speaker 2: there called x y Z virus. So now when they
Speaker 2: they get sick, they're expecting to be told exactly what
Speaker 2: they're going to tell them, Yeah, you've got it or
Speaker 2: you're about to get it worse. And now all of
Speaker 2: a sudden they are positive, when in reality they're just
Speaker 2: adding to numbers, so then they can fudge up the
Speaker 2: statistics of the level of people who have something that
Speaker 2: they just made up as and gave it a label,
Speaker 2: and that everybody's minds are tuned into thinking that that
Speaker 2: must be what they have. Oh, I got a headache,
Speaker 2: I must have brain tumors. You know, if that was
Speaker 2: if that was a viral brain tumor thing epidemic, then
Speaker 2: they would.
Speaker 1: Say, yeah, it's viruless.
Speaker 2: And then all of a sudden, the things that were
Speaker 2: never ever ever ever ever ever reported or you know,
Speaker 2: considered to be an issue. The fraud is you open
Speaker 2: it up to fraud and they're like, yeah, you have
Speaker 2: x y Z virus of the day, because that's the
Speaker 2: that's the going trend, this is the trendy thing, this
Speaker 2: is the this is the TikTok uh virus right now,
Speaker 2: so you gotta you got one of that, and uh,
Speaker 2: here's here's the solution to fix it. And then also
Speaker 2: the death toll changes, right because a bunch of people
Speaker 2: who weren't didn't actually have it, but they're told that
Speaker 2: they do in a comparison to those that are getting
Speaker 2: the treatments.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: This this altered diagnosis in itself prevents proper comparison between
Speaker 2: the past and the present case rates. But if with
Speaker 2: an inflated case rate there is an increase instead of
Speaker 2: a decrease in the death rate, such as an increase
Speaker 2: is surely highly significant. For instance, we find that for
Speaker 2: the fifteen years subsequent to the introduction of anti toxin,
Speaker 2: which is a stupid thing, well like it's there are
Speaker 2: toxic or it isn't, but it's an anti toxin, the
Speaker 2: number of deaths in England and Wales from diphtheria became
Speaker 2: twenty percent greater than they had been for the fifteen
Speaker 2: years prior to the serum, the thing that's supposed to
Speaker 2: fix it. But they're like, oh, but no, you don't
Speaker 2: understand there was an epidemic of it because it's obviously
Speaker 2: a virus that does it, and not conditions of war,
Speaker 2: not conditions of you know, filth or you know malnutrition.
Speaker 1: Certainly not that.
Speaker 2: No, No, it's this magical unicorn that you can't see,
Speaker 2: invisible magic unicorn and the serum treatment. It will never
Speaker 2: be blamed for the increase in deaths, although that's the
Speaker 2: direct cause, or the antibiotics or the anti virals that
Speaker 2: they give it, or the anti toxins that they give it.
Speaker 2: Though the Metropolitan Asylums Board report of cases may seem
Speaker 2: to show at first sight by a decreased death rate
Speaker 2: that that advantage accruise from the use of the anti toxin,
Speaker 2: their detailed particulars showed the opposite to be the case.
Speaker 2: Whereas for the years of eighteen ninety five nineteen oh seven,
Speaker 2: there were sixty three, two hundred forty nine cases of
Speaker 2: the theory treated with anti tooxin, of which eight thousand,
Speaker 2: nine hundred and seventeen died, giving the fatality rate of
Speaker 2: fourteen point nine o nine percent, there were for the
Speaker 2: same years ty seve hundred sixteen cases not treated with
Speaker 2: anti toxin, which only seven hundred and three died. Whoopsies,
Speaker 2: given the fatality rate of six percent. Footnotes to the
Speaker 2: tables show that of the later cases, and this isn't
Speaker 2: still not saying that diptheria itself is a virus. It's
Speaker 2: a condition of the weakening of the system and the
Speaker 2: toxins in your environment, and what the hell is inside
Speaker 2: your body from those toxins, the exposure exposure right when
Speaker 2: you're in a week in the state, when you're in
Speaker 2: a malnuris state. Otherwise, probably you could walk through. Maybe
Speaker 2: not radiation, because that has like an energetic thing that
Speaker 2: does happen to you. You know what they say, Radiation
Speaker 2: doesn't need a medium, doesn't require a medium that can
Speaker 2: pass through everything except for lead, doesn't require an n mediary.
Speaker 2: So maybe not so much that, But you could probably
Speaker 2: trudge through sewage and not get sick if you had
Speaker 2: a good enough, strong enough in eternal environment. Your microsigmas
Speaker 2: were on pumping at the gym. Right, footnotes of the
Speaker 2: tables show that I don't care about the footnotes. Oh okay,
Speaker 2: I guess I have to read it to the table
Speaker 2: to show that of the latter cases, fifty five were
Speaker 2: morbon when admitted, and twelve died of diseases other than diphtheria,
Speaker 2: So it wasn't all diptheria, and some of them had comorbidities,
Speaker 2: so that fatality rates should in reality be under six percent.
Speaker 2: It is to be regretted that the cases treated with
Speaker 2: and without anti toxin are no longer relisted separately in
Speaker 2: the Metropolitan Asylum Boards reports, and since nineteen thirty, the
Speaker 2: board itself has ceased to exist. From those cases that
Speaker 2: have been particularized. There seems to be no denying that
Speaker 2: improved methods of nursing and medical treatment, which should reduce tests,
Speaker 2: accomplish this to a lesser degree when antiitoxin is administered. Right,
Speaker 2: sanitation great, but you're still injecting the poison directly into them,
Speaker 2: So therefore it's not really an improvement. The falling although
Speaker 2: it looks nice and white and pretty inside those offices,
Speaker 2: the falling table supplies proof of this new of this
Speaker 2: view with regard to infantile disease. I mean, isn't it
Speaker 2: fun to go to a doctor's table, the most uncomfortable
Speaker 2: thing you could possibly sit on or lay on, and uh,
Speaker 2: you know, the the orangeish, weird, brownish leather, fake pleasu
Speaker 2: or whatever the hell it is, and then like you're
Speaker 2: basically sitting on a toilet seat cover. Right, the the
Speaker 2: little sheets that they pulled down, right, that's that. That
Speaker 2: means that you know they're taking any precaution and make
Speaker 2: sure you don't get imaginary bullshit diseases.
Speaker 1: Or viruses. Right. Thanks, thanks for that thin piece of
Speaker 1: like paper. Awesome.
Speaker 2: So bring a color you know what you want to do.
Speaker 2: You want to you want to trip out your doctor.
Speaker 2: Bring crayons and sit in the chair that's usually by
Speaker 2: that bed and just start coloring on it. Draw pictures
Speaker 2: and by the time they could you use sometimes you're
Speaker 2: waiting in there for a while, draw them a picture
Speaker 2: and then tear it off and hand it to them.
Speaker 2: We see here the remarkable decrease in measles, scarlet fever,
Speaker 2: and whooping cough complaints not subject to treatment by inoculation
Speaker 2: with wild dipteria with its specific anti toxin shows an
Speaker 2: increase of one hundred and two per million. The contrast
Speaker 2: is striking. So yes, they all went down without treatment. Diesels,
Speaker 2: scarlet fever, whooping cop diphtheria, on the other hand, shot
Speaker 2: up because they had something to quote unquote treat it
Speaker 2: with the claim for immediate injection and the advantage of
Speaker 2: a first day inoculation as compared to with a second day,
Speaker 2: and so forth may surely be dismissed for the flying reasons.
Speaker 2: Before clinical symptoms are manifest, is impossible to tell whether
Speaker 2: the trouble would ever be serious, if indeed the diphtheria
Speaker 2: be genuine, and if, on the other hand, it be
Speaker 2: asserted that the prompt administration of anti toxin has prevented
Speaker 2: dangerous illness, it is easy to assert on the other
Speaker 2: that through anti toxin a mere mild sore throat has
Speaker 2: been aggravated into severe sickness, sometimes complicated by hard trouble
Speaker 2: and paralysis. Okay, I'm gonna stop here and just say
Speaker 2: one thing has Oregon Trail or Oregon trail if you
Speaker 2: prefer taught you anything or taught you nothing. Jimmy has
Speaker 2: snake bite a little bit further down the road. Jimmy
Speaker 2: has died. Why because it was a goddamn thing squirting
Speaker 2: poison into him.
Speaker 1: That's why.
Speaker 2: It was a hollow tube pointed that shot poison from
Speaker 2: it into Jimmy.
Speaker 1: And now Jimmy is.
Speaker 2: On the side of the road in a three foot
Speaker 2: deep grave.
Speaker 1: Sorry, Jimmy.
Speaker 2: Okay, Now, when they when you're going down to odegn
Speaker 2: trail and they say somebody has cholera. No, probably not,
Speaker 2: probably not really a word, probably not really a thing,
Speaker 2: but maybe malnutrition can considering your circumstances of on the trail,
Speaker 2: not having the best sanitation or nutrition available to you
Speaker 2: along trecks and trails, wearing down the body, and very
Speaker 2: probably shitty sleep, fear of being eaten by a bear
Speaker 2: or something while you're sleeping if you're parked out on
Speaker 2: the side, or whatever the case may be, having to
Speaker 2: stand guard against your oxen that night for attack or
Speaker 2: whatever the fuck it is, natives whatever. But uh, yeah,
Speaker 2: the thing that kills little Jimmy did it the way
Speaker 2: that's unnatural to us to have things administered.
Speaker 1: We didn't eat it.
Speaker 2: We didn't swallow the venom, although that probably wouldn't be
Speaker 2: a great practice either. They do that with a heli
Speaker 2: monster venom and ozimpic and it paralyzes his vegus nerve
Speaker 2: causes your retinas to freaking deteriorate in all kinds of problems.
Speaker 2: Gas or paresis not a good thing either way. Poisonous poison,
Speaker 2: but the more immediate death is gonna be from injecting it.
Speaker 2: Directly into and bypassing all those safeguards that start here
Speaker 2: and end in your boothole.
Speaker 1: Where was that?
Speaker 2: Yeah? All right, then, yeah, let's keep going here. I
Speaker 2: want to see if I is there an actual one
Speaker 2: that says.
Speaker 1: I'm looking for now.
Speaker 2: I have a wicked pain right now. It's not feeling great.
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna lie. I feel like a place I
Speaker 2: had my surgery is ripping open or something. Oh man,
Speaker 2: it's like sharp pains.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: Let me maybe I have to look at it by
Speaker 2: word and look for the anthrax one name, basically the
Speaker 2: word anthrax on this I will wait, hold on boom,
Speaker 2: animal zerology, anthrax.
Speaker 1: So let's look. Let's look a little bit at this.
Speaker 1: Ethel Hume says.
Speaker 2: A Frenchman named de la Fond in eighteen thirty eight
Speaker 2: announced that a small rod like objects were found where
Speaker 2: be found in the blood of animals having splenic fever
Speaker 2: or charbone, now called anthrax, and when pastor brought out
Speaker 2: his one specific germ for each kind of fermentation, de
Speaker 2: Vane suggested that these little rods, which he named bacteridia,
Speaker 2: might be parasites in the cause of the splenic fever. However,
Speaker 2: his experiments were contradictory and it was not proven. Okay,
Speaker 2: so hold on a second. So we're talking aboutites brought
Speaker 2: in a specific germ. Remember one this is this is
Speaker 2: Pastor right. One cause, one cure, not a series of
Speaker 2: things that cause a condition to occur, Not the weakening
Speaker 2: of something allowing something else to affect it. No, one cause,
Speaker 2: one cure. This is the other problem with allopathy. However,
Speaker 2: his experiment, because it's also the war model, which is
Speaker 2: completely stupid.
Speaker 1: However, his experience went okay.
Speaker 2: Later in eighteen seventy eight, Coke made some studies in
Speaker 2: which he discovered the formation of sports among his bacteridia.
Speaker 2: When Pastor heard of this, he declared, anthrax is Therefore,
Speaker 2: this is what This is what Pastor did. He was
Speaker 2: stand up pompous, arrogant, smug and stupid and and you know,
Speaker 2: very overconfident. They're hearing what other people are working on
Speaker 2: and then make assertions and claims ahead of them while
Speaker 2: they're busy doing the work. And I'm not making I'm
Speaker 2: not saying anything positive about Coke either, because he had
Speaker 2: his own freaking frauds with a tuberculin.
Speaker 1: But this is.
Speaker 2: How he screwed over Bey Shamp and pretty much co
Speaker 2: opted everything that he was doing. Antiox is therefore that
Speaker 2: these are observational assumptions, right, is therefore the disease of
Speaker 2: the Bacteridium as trichinosis is, the disease of trichina as
Speaker 2: itch is, disease of special arcis a keras he claimed
Speaker 2: that the blood of an animal vaccinating with Anthrax scoreum
Speaker 2: contained no other organisms but this bai Bacteriidia as he
Speaker 2: considered these exclusively aerobic.
Speaker 1: As a required error, the blood.
Speaker 2: Must be imputrescible, because putrescence, he believed, was due solely
Speaker 2: to anaerobic or not needing air. Later, when the professor
Speaker 2: of the Turin Commission drew contrary conclusions from similar experiments,
Speaker 2: he changed. He charged that they had used sheep whose
Speaker 2: blood was septic as well as tainted with anthrax. So
Speaker 2: whenever somebody challenged his stupidity, he said he without even
Speaker 2: looking at their experiments, this is a fraud, all right,
Speaker 2: This is a straight up grifter. He was like, well,
Speaker 2: because you didn't do this and you didn't do that, Like,
Speaker 2: how do you know when you didn't do that? You're
Speaker 2: just making these statements and you're doing it on a
Speaker 2: platform where everybody listens to you, so therefore you're you're
Speaker 2: fucking up public opinion and you're discrediting people who are
Speaker 2: actually doing real work.
Speaker 1: Nika idiots.
Speaker 2: Charged that they had used sheeps whose blood was quote
Speaker 2: unquote septic as well as tainted with anthrax. He claimed
Speaker 2: that a mixture of aerobic germs, the Bacteriadia and anaerobe
Speaker 2: germs of future Faction, would neutralize the virulence of the
Speaker 2: Bacillus and Tracis, and and if injected into animals, would
Speaker 2: protect them from infection, again with the stupid injections. In reality,
Speaker 2: these two germs are and are only different developments of
Speaker 2: or outgrowths of Beason's microsimons, and should have much the
Speaker 2: same effect anywhere, namely that of scavengers of dead tissue
Speaker 2: or waste. Their action should be similar and not conter
Speaker 2: actants to each other, as as is indicated in chapter two.
Speaker 2: Doctor Colon, another member of the Academy, promptly challenged Pastor's
Speaker 2: statement on the grounds that anthrax was sometimes found in
Speaker 2: virulent stage yet devoid of the bacteria idea. In the
Speaker 2: next session March twelfth, eighteen seventy eight, doctor Colan charged
Speaker 2: that Pasture had suppressed two statements in printed record that
Speaker 2: he had made on the floor during the prior session,
Speaker 2: ie that the bacteria idea of anthrax do not develop
Speaker 2: in the blood of healthy animals, and that the bacteria
Speaker 2: idea will not supply germs to the organisms, which left
Speaker 2: doctor Colan's criticisms of these statements in the air. And
Speaker 2: in addition, he charged that Pasture had deliberately falsified the
Speaker 2: record of other.
Speaker 1: Criticisms doctor Plan had made. Why was he in charge
Speaker 1: of the record? Is the problem?
Speaker 2: An April thirty, at eighteen seventy eight, Pasture read before
Speaker 2: the Academy of Science a paper entitled the Theory of
Speaker 2: Germs and their Application to Medical to Medicine and Surgery,
Speaker 2: which also bore the names Messrs Hubert and Chamberlain as
Speaker 2: co authors. This was his first attempt to sell the
Speaker 2: germ theory in this Among many false claims was the
Speaker 2: statement that he had discovered the fact that fermentations of
Speaker 2: living beings given no credit to Bey shomp whatever. This
Speaker 2: paper also claimed that the infinitesimal quantity of their last
Speaker 2: produced culture was capable of producing anthrax with all its symptoms.
Speaker 2: Yet their first experiments with it were failures, as the
Speaker 2: cultures when sowed, produced a small sphere germ that was
Speaker 2: not even virulent, instead of the typical anthrax rods that
Speaker 2: were expected. This was probably a true mutation, but was
Speaker 2: not so recognized. The author is apparently believing it to
Speaker 2: be a result of an impurity getting into the cultures,
Speaker 2: not understanding or recognizing what microzymes do. They produce what's
Speaker 2: needed for the occasion. The London Times of August eighth,
Speaker 2: eighteen eighty one, about three years later, quoted Pasture as
Speaker 2: saying before a sectional meeting of an international medical congress
Speaker 2: and session there in the study of micro organisms, there
Speaker 2: was an ever present source of error in the introduction
Speaker 2: of foreign germs. Now they're created from within dipshit in
Speaker 2: spite of the precautions that might be taken against them.
Speaker 2: When the observer saw first the one organism and then
Speaker 2: afterwards a different one that's called pleomorphic microzyma, they're changing form.
Speaker 2: He was prone to conclude that the first organism had
Speaker 2: underground a change. Yet this might be a your illusion.
Speaker 2: The transformation of a bacillus and thracus into a micrococcus
Speaker 2: did not exist.
Speaker 1: Oh really, fool.
Speaker 2: Note that he said this twenty one years after Miss
Speaker 2: Nightingale made her famous statement that any germ could turn
Speaker 2: into another, as previously quoted, and when their own experiments
Speaker 2: failed to bear out their claims that their culture would
Speaker 2: produce anthrax or any of its symptoms, and the germs
Speaker 2: that were produced had no resemblance to the anthrax germ,
Speaker 2: either in appearance or virulence. Why should others believe that
Speaker 2: they could prevent anthrax through the use of this culture?
Speaker 2: But Paul Decrief in Microbe Hunters, a glorification of many
Speaker 2: famous pioneer serum Faddest, paints a most astonishing picture of
Speaker 2: pastures work on anthrax and gives many startling details regarding
Speaker 2: the facts of the matter. After describing the silkworm failure failure,
Speaker 2: he says, but one of Pastor's most charming traits was
Speaker 2: his characteristic and scientific phoenix.
Speaker 1: Who's wrote, who wrote? Who rose triumphantly.
Speaker 2: From the ashes of his own mistakes, So it is
Speaker 2: not surprising to find him, with Rue and Chamberlain and
Speaker 2: ATDD one discovering the very pretty way of taming vicious
Speaker 2: anthrax microbes and turning them into a vaccine.
Speaker 1: Not reality, but that's what they right.
Speaker 2: He describes Pasture's demonstration of anthrax vaccine at Pouli la
Speaker 2: Forte in May June of I'm breathing, whistling, I'm whistling, line, breathing,
Speaker 2: It's weird of the year in great detail, including the
Speaker 2: elaborate preparations, and he dwells on the fact that this
Speaker 2: experiment was framed by his enemies to destroy him, and
Speaker 2: that Pastor realized that he was cornered, that he must
Speaker 2: succeed or else abandoned his work on germs. It seems
Speaker 2: to me that we have now seen too many cases
Speaker 2: of deceit, fullness, prevaricate.
Speaker 1: Hold on no, yes, isn't my throwm.
Speaker 2: Prevarication, and deliberate fraud on Pastor's part to place much
Speaker 2: confidence in his good faith under such conditions, and in fact,
Speaker 2: one of them is justified in looking in with suspicion
Speaker 2: on this experiment.
Speaker 1: Here where forty eight.
Speaker 2: Sheep twenty is supposed to be vaccinated lived while twenty
Speaker 2: four vaccinated died in such a number the treatment might
Speaker 2: be differentiated quite easily. How could he how could easily,
Speaker 2: oh sorry, he could easily have injected the unvaccinated sheep
Speaker 2: with a slow poison, and he might have used pure
Speaker 2: sterile water or syringe with a perforated piston in a
Speaker 2: pretended injection of the vaccinated sheep. This miracle, as the
Speaker 2: quief describes it, seems to be the only success in
Speaker 2: a long series of failures, the single result that gives
Speaker 2: the only real support to Pastures Clay. After all the
Speaker 2: double dealing and fraud that we have proven elsewhere, we
Speaker 2: are not entitled to be skeptical of.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 2: Does not his past conduct, past conduct suggest that he
Speaker 2: could have been loading the dice, and he does not
Speaker 2: seem to have been able to repeat the success elsewhere.
Speaker 1: Decreef says of this fact.
Speaker 2: Gradually, hardly a year after the miracle of the Pulia Lafort,
Speaker 2: it began to be evident that Pasture, they most original
Speaker 2: microbe hunter, was not an infallible god. Disturbing letters began
Speaker 2: to pile up on his desk. Complaints from Montpelier man
Speaker 2: in a dozen Times of France, from Pactish and Capovar
Speaker 2: in Hungary. Sheep were dying from anthrax. Sheep were dying
Speaker 2: from anthrax, not natural anthrax.
Speaker 1: They had picked it.
Speaker 2: They had picked up in dangerous fields, but anthrax they
Speaker 2: had gotten from those vaccines that were meant to save
Speaker 2: them ah tea from other places came Sinister's stories of
Speaker 2: how the vaccines had failed to work. The vaccine had
Speaker 2: been paid for, the whole flocks of sheep had been injected.
Speaker 2: The farmers had gone to bed breathing thank God for
Speaker 2: the great man Pasturer, going to wake up in the
Speaker 2: morning to find their fields littered with the carcasses of
Speaker 2: dead sheep. And these sheep, which ought to have been immune,
Speaker 2: had died from the lurking anthrax.
Speaker 1: Sports that lay in the fields.
Speaker 2: Know from the ones that were injected, from the shit
Speaker 2: poison that was injected into them. Anthrax, notwithstanding poison was
Speaker 2: injected in them. Pessher began to hate opening his letters.
Speaker 2: He wanted to stop his ears against snickers that sounded
Speaker 2: from around corners. And then the worst thing that could
Speaker 2: possibly happen came a cold, terribly exact scientific report from
Speaker 2: the laboratory that of that nasty little German Coke in Berlin.
Speaker 2: And this report ripped the practicalness of the anthrax backing.
Speaker 2: The Tatter's pastor knew that Coke was the most accurate
Speaker 2: Microube hunter in the world, which means nothing, because they're
Speaker 2: all frauds. There was no doubt that Pastor lost some
Speaker 2: sleep from the this aftermath of his glorious discovery.
Speaker 1: But God rest him.
Speaker 2: He was a gallant man, and it was not in
Speaker 2: him to admit, either to the public, to the public,
Speaker 2: or to himself that his sweeping claims were wrong.
Speaker 1: Right, I think we're gonna call it there.
Speaker 2: It's already two arge in thirty minutes. Yeah, we're having
Speaker 2: trouble streaming to fgg med.
Speaker 1: Yah, we know that. Thanks, thanks, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 2: All right, let's see you gotta still with me, You
Speaker 2: still with me over there, all right, so don't forget.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna get to the thing here, uh right here.
Speaker 2: So the very first one clicked that, but then all right,
Speaker 2: and I went over this in the beginning step one
Speaker 2: click the thing submit nominee tab on the right hand corner.
Speaker 2: You'll be asked to fill out the number of fields.
Speaker 2: Here are their answers nominee Peter Glidden n D Email
Speaker 2: D R. Glitden at ProtonMail dot com phone number eight
Speaker 2: five five three four seven three six nine six. You
Speaker 2: can always pause this afterward right bio go to leave
Speaker 2: big farm behind dot Com backslash d r hyphen Glitten
Speaker 2: Glitten Publications. Everybody is sick and I know why. Attempt
Speaker 2: to cure with holistic medicine website. Leave bigfar behind dot
Speaker 2: Com videos too, Malion list reference social media links below
Speaker 2: and also watch this one and it's uh lebig farwer
Speaker 2: behind dot com backslash maha m eah so no wait,
Speaker 2: I need to tell you this because this is important too.
Speaker 1: If you're not already doing it, do it? You want
Speaker 1: to trust me?
Speaker 2: Doctor Peter Glynn's membership site right there, right here in
Speaker 2: the green Can you see it?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 1: What the hell? Hold on? Son of a bitch? There
Speaker 1: you go? Why is this not showing? There you go?
Speaker 6: There you go.
Speaker 2: Now back to where we were at, Doctor Peter Glidden,
Speaker 2: leave big farm behind dot Com. The first one I
Speaker 2: was showing you before you couldn't see is this one
Speaker 2: right here?
Speaker 1: Okay?
Speaker 2: That's nominate doctor Glidden here, become a member support the
Speaker 2: show that way. Use this code Ballbusters for fifty percent off. Okay,
Speaker 2: huge difference from sixty month to thirty and if you
Speaker 2: do the year the annual it becomes twenty bucks a
Speaker 2: month or you get four months free. Howevery way you
Speaker 2: want to look at that, okay, and then Givesingo dot
Speaker 2: com backslash ball Busters supports the show, and Patreon dot
Speaker 2: com is another way to do that, all right, And
Speaker 2: down here you see tribalu. This is for seventeen percent off.
Speaker 2: You use this code right here and you'll see all
Speaker 2: the tinctures that are there, and there's descriptions explains everything
Speaker 2: about them and what they do.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: If you want to send me something here it is
Speaker 2: right here ball Busters broadcast number one zero two nine.
Speaker 2: Next line is one zero one West sixteenth Street, Suite A, Yuma, Arizona,
Speaker 2: eight five three sixty four. And then this disclaimer be advised.
Speaker 2: And I'm not asking you to do this, but if
Speaker 2: you are compelled to mail me a check for the
Speaker 2: show support, it must be written out to Simper Fry
Speaker 2: s C M P E R f R y LLC
Speaker 2: dot com. Same as my website which is right here.
Speaker 2: And there's another way to access getting to doctor Peter
Speaker 2: Clinton right there, and then you sign up use Ballbusters
Speaker 2: all one word lowercase.
Speaker 1: That's how I roll, all right, and.
Speaker 2: Remember code victory if you want anything from the hot sauce,
Speaker 2: which by the way, is freaking amazing.
Speaker 1: I would I would, you know.
Speaker 2: I was looking at bottles for smaller ones, for like
Speaker 2: a Christmas style like packs, but the glasses were the
Speaker 2: glass bottles were not big enough holes for me to
Speaker 2: put the sauce in. It's a little bit thicker, which
Speaker 2: is awesome because you can basically spread most of my
Speaker 2: sauce with a butter knife. It's fucking amazing, all right.
Speaker 2: Tied di with thy peppers is awesome. Just saying smoked boss,
Speaker 2: smoked Boss is smoked Chipotle and paprika smoked paprika, So
Speaker 2: I should I shouldn't say smoked Chipotle because Chipotle literally
Speaker 2: means that.
Speaker 1: That's like saying smoke smoked.
Speaker 2: Never mind, all right, anyway, Cosmic candy, honey, hobbinnarow venom u, cayanne,
Speaker 2: s around habnaro, ti chili pepper, Trinidad scorpion pepper, and
Speaker 2: smoked ghost pepper. This is one of my go tos
Speaker 2: uh given the gun slinger. That's my steps of me
Speaker 2: as a lit younger. That one is muruga, scorpion pepper
Speaker 2: and cayenne because kaya makes everything taste better, so you
Speaker 2: balance it give them the boot ghose pepper. This one
Speaker 2: is our my only kido sauce right now, and that
Speaker 2: is with Caribbean red hobin narrows.
Speaker 1: All right, If I.
Speaker 2: Can never figure out how to make this carrot conundrum
Speaker 2: shelf stable, i'll make it again. But it's been many
Speaker 2: years and it was awesome. It was so good with sushi,
Speaker 2: not that I would eat so much sushi now. I
Speaker 2: haven't eaten in yours either, but it's good and a
Speaker 2: lot of other things too. Let's see where we're at,
Speaker 2: Slice of life, Haunted heat, smoke, goose peppers. If you
Speaker 2: like super hot, this one's out.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 2: Maybe you have a couple straight up gee. But then
Speaker 2: the act the hottest of the hot. So these guys
Speaker 2: down here are these three And people always ask that
Speaker 2: because they want to know. So Retality is the hottest
Speaker 2: with very second, and brand Nex is probably somewhere in there,
Speaker 2: tied maybe with this one or slightly step down.
Speaker 1: I thought I had more papers to light. Maybe I
Speaker 1: sold them. I'll have to check that. And let's see.
Speaker 2: Humsinger is a World Hot Sauce Award winner. Garbonzo beans
Speaker 2: a human tastes like a spicy hummus, nemesis, mingo homa narrow,
Speaker 2: kind of irritating the make but whatever, zeus juice extra hot,
Speaker 2: lots of garlic, kainda and hab naro super tastey.
Speaker 1: I'm going through the highlights here.
Speaker 2: Sergeant pepper, color, brazy pepper, smittlely, very tasty, trouble shuffle
Speaker 2: as gear delly, chocolate dam it. Yes, I make all these,
Speaker 2: and I came up with the recipes myself, dream ginny serrano,
Speaker 2: honey and lime, which all either way, it makes a
Speaker 2: really good if you like salads, I do that lots
Speaker 2: of cheese and blue cheese and do boom bang, and
Speaker 2: then I like that as it's sella addressing. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: also these the other ways, but regional recipe, but I
Speaker 2: believe it's kind of like the traditional, like wing style
Speaker 2: sauce when pigs fly with bacon or snap with honey,
Speaker 2: grateful vet with m seed, awesome avocado.
Speaker 1: You get it.
Speaker 2: There's lots of stuff here, right, sauces apprentices torano, hobbonaro,
Speaker 2: lay hold on what yes serrano serrano, serrano, habbonaro, alipino
Speaker 2: and what did I miss?
Speaker 1: Cayenne?
Speaker 2: And it's also what do you call it? Blood orange
Speaker 2: juice and key lime. And then there's the Feast of Friends,
Speaker 2: which is Sano habanero, alipino, cayenne and pomegranate juice and
Speaker 2: key lime. So it's slightly different. I made to these
Speaker 2: because one was you know, one season here you get
Speaker 2: that juice, the other season you get the other juice.
Speaker 2: So that's how I was doing it, because I was
Speaker 2: getting all that stuff fresh from the farmer's markets, so
Speaker 2: when they had it, that's when I made it. Golden
Speaker 2: Ratio has a lot of fun, but I don't think
Speaker 2: I have I may have a couple of these left.
Speaker 2: These are Carolina Reaper and Pineapple Human, which makes it
Speaker 2: kind of like a spicy Jamaican jerk sauce. But it's
Speaker 2: freaking delicious because I Tariaki should have a couple of
Speaker 2: left too, And it doesn't matter spicy honey, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: get the stuffer back in the make it.
Speaker 1: That's the one thing that she does. I make everything else,
Speaker 1: but she makes she makes good honey.
Speaker 2: There you go, and then get the book, do it,
Speaker 2: do it, inform the people, and then creating is what
Speaker 2: I'm about to go take with my ninety essentials right now.
Speaker 1: Get on my incline bench, get huge, and then go
Speaker 1: on the.
Speaker 2: Elliptical and try putting together computer and put out orders
Speaker 2: and macaut sauce. Today I've got my hossal order to
Speaker 2: do too. But yeah, I highly recommend doing this membership.
Speaker 2: You best if you want to consider yourself a friend
Speaker 2: of doctor Glyndon or doctor Mazo, fill out that thing
Speaker 2: and I'll show you again.
Speaker 1: No, I shouldn't realize. Get it done. Thank you having
Speaker 1: a nice say, what do you mean comments, commitments? I
Speaker 1: use the link. What do you mean it doesn't go
Speaker 1: to her? What the fuck?
Speaker 2: All right, hold on, well that's what was then in
Speaker 2: too my thing. Let me take a look, go back
Speaker 2: to it. That may cut it off or somewhere. Oh,
Speaker 2: let me take a look. I'll put it in this,
Speaker 2: I'll put in the chat and then i'll fix it
Speaker 2: later if I can find it where I took it,
Speaker 2: right off of where it was copied and paste. It
Speaker 2: says https triblue dot r e f R and dot
Speaker 2: r e f r dot cc backslash ballbusters.
Speaker 1: That's that's I just.
Speaker 2: All I do is highlight copy and past unless I
Speaker 2: got scrambled, because sometimes when I right click and I
Speaker 2: left click and try to highlight it like moves ship around.
Speaker 2: So tell me what the what the right one is
Speaker 2: so I can fill it out. See it's doing it again.
Speaker 2: It's not let me grab it. This is a This
Speaker 2: is like a freaking debrisoffice, which is some bullshit when
Speaker 2: you don't want to pay for Microsoft Office. And it's
Speaker 2: what I wrote my book on. But it's a pain
Speaker 2: in the sack because it's like from it's like what
Speaker 2: Linux uses instead of Office, and sometimes it's it's just shitty.
Speaker 2: So I'm not gonna do Linux. I'm gonna have to
Speaker 2: do Microsoft when I get this computer done. So I'm
Speaker 2: copying it right now. I'm chesting it right now. As
Speaker 2: you're saying, is.
Speaker 1: Hold on.
Speaker 2: If it got scrambled, it's because that it started shifting
Speaker 2: and things together, because it doesn't always.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, it's jacked up. You're right, So tell me
Speaker 1: what the right one is. Yeah I know that.
Speaker 2: Well tell me what the right one is. Okay, then
Speaker 2: that's that all right? Thanks for thanks for playing, because
Speaker 2: he didn't tell me what the right one was.
Speaker 1: So we're up. Bye,