1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,000
Speaker 1: Hey everyone, and welcome back. Ready to go on another

2
00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:04,919
deep dive with us. This time we're tackling a topic

3
00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:08,080
that's sure to stretch your perceptions and maybe even leave

4
00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:09,199
you looking over your shoulder.

5
00:00:09,400 --> 00:00:11,640
Speaker 2: It's definitely one of those concepts that can really make

6
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:14,160
you question everything you thought you knew exactly.

7
00:00:14,919 --> 00:00:18,079
Speaker 1: Today, we're venturing into the world of simulation theory.

8
00:00:18,199 --> 00:00:20,760
Speaker 2: Buckle up, because things are about to get pretty weird.

9
00:00:21,039 --> 00:00:25,000
Speaker 1: We'll be exploring the arguments, sifting through the evidence, and

10
00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:28,600
trying to wrap our heads around the mind boggling possibility

11
00:00:29,039 --> 00:00:33,159
that our reality might be well, not so real after all.

12
00:00:33,520 --> 00:00:36,520
Speaker 2: And what's particularly fascinating about this is that the idea

13
00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:38,840
that we might be living in a simulation isn't just

14
00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:41,280
some recent sci fi fantasy.

15
00:00:41,359 --> 00:00:42,640
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it's got deep roots.

16
00:00:42,759 --> 00:00:46,159
Speaker 2: Definitely. Ancient philosophers going all the way back to Plato

17
00:00:46,399 --> 00:00:48,759
pondered the nature of reality and often came to the

18
00:00:48,759 --> 00:00:51,240
conclusion that our senses might be deceiving us.

19
00:00:51,359 --> 00:00:54,280
Speaker 1: It's like a universal itch we can't quite scratch, that

20
00:00:54,399 --> 00:00:56,200
feeling that things aren't quite as they seem.

21
00:00:56,399 --> 00:00:59,240
Speaker 2: It definitely seems to tap into something deep within the

22
00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:03,359
human psyche. This desire to understand the true nature of

23
00:01:03,359 --> 00:01:05,239
our existence absolutely.

24
00:01:05,879 --> 00:01:09,920
Speaker 1: But today it's not just philosophers grappling with this idea.

25
00:01:10,719 --> 00:01:13,599
We've got some heavy hitters in science and technology like

26
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:17,799
Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson openly speculating that we

27
00:01:17,879 --> 00:01:19,879
might be living in a simulated reality.

28
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:22,920
Speaker 2: They're definitely not shying away from the big questions, and

29
00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:25,959
that's what makes this whole topic so intriguing.

30
00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:28,359
Speaker 1: It really is. And to add to that, we have

31
00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:32,599
Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom who throws down a serious gauntlet

32
00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:34,000
with his simulation trilemma.

33
00:01:34,239 --> 00:01:35,959
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a real head scratcher.

34
00:01:36,120 --> 00:01:39,799
Speaker 1: Essentially, he presents three possibilities, each more mind bending than

35
00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:43,680
the last one. Civilizations wipe themselves out before they reach

36
00:01:43,799 --> 00:01:47,840
the tech level needed to create realistic simulations. Two, they

37
00:01:47,879 --> 00:01:50,319
get there but decide not to create simulations, maybe for

38
00:01:50,359 --> 00:01:51,120
ethical reasons.

39
00:01:51,159 --> 00:01:52,719
Speaker 2: And then there's door number three, the.

40
00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:54,959
Speaker 1: One where we're already living in a simulation created by

41
00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:56,840
some super advanced civilization.

42
00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:01,599
Speaker 2: The kicker is that he argues all three are equally likely.

43
00:02:01,519 --> 00:02:04,439
Speaker 1: So basically we're left with a cosmic coin toss pretty much.

44
00:02:04,519 --> 00:02:07,680
And when you consider the pace of technological advancement. I mean,

45
00:02:07,719 --> 00:02:10,000
look at how far we've come in just the last century.

46
00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:11,879
Speaker 2: It's truly remarkable.

47
00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:14,680
Speaker 1: It kind of makes you wonder what will be possible

48
00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,360
in another one hundred years, a thousand.

49
00:02:17,479 --> 00:02:20,400
Speaker 2: The possibilities are both exciting and a little terrifying.

50
00:02:20,759 --> 00:02:24,039
Speaker 1: Definitely. But let's delve into some of the arguments for

51
00:02:24,159 --> 00:02:26,639
why some of the brightest minds think we might be

52
00:02:26,719 --> 00:02:27,719
simulated beings.

53
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:29,960
Speaker 2: Right, where do we even begin with this?

54
00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,240
Speaker 1: Well, let's start with the granddaddy of all cosmic events,

55
00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:34,759
the Big Bang.

56
00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:36,080
Speaker 2: The ultimate origin story.

57
00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:39,800
Speaker 1: Right from absolute nothingness, all the matter and energy in

58
00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:41,960
the universe bursts into being.

59
00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:44,479
Speaker 2: In a single, incomprehensible instant.

60
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,039
Speaker 1: Science has given us a pretty good understanding of how

61
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,719
it happened, but the why remains elusive.

62
00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:53,360
Speaker 2: It's the ultimate question, isn't it What triggered this cosmic ignition?

63
00:02:53,439 --> 00:02:55,000
What came before the Big Bang?

64
00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:56,840
Speaker 1: It's like trying to imagine what's near to.

65
00:02:56,919 --> 00:03:00,879
Speaker 2: The North Pole precisely? But what if instead of unknowable

66
00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:04,599
primordial event, the Big Bang was simply the moment a

67
00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:07,120
super advanced computer program was initiated.

68
00:03:07,199 --> 00:03:08,680
Speaker 1: Okay, well, let's unpack that.

69
00:03:08,719 --> 00:03:12,240
Speaker 2: Sure, So imagine all the fundamental constants of physics, the

70
00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:15,680
laws governing gravity, even consciousness itself, all of.

71
00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:17,719
Speaker 1: That, the very fabric of reality.

72
00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:21,599
Speaker 2: Exactly what if it's all just lines of code carefully

73
00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:23,840
crafted by some cosmic programmer.

74
00:03:24,400 --> 00:03:28,599
Speaker 1: So instead of searching for some grand, unifying theory of everything,

75
00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:31,240
we might just be trying to decipher the source code

76
00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:32,560
of our simulated reality.

77
00:03:32,639 --> 00:03:35,360
Speaker 2: It's a mind blowing shift in perspective, for sure.

78
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:37,639
Speaker 1: But think about it. How does a video game work.

79
00:03:38,319 --> 00:03:40,000
You've got a set of rules, a.

80
00:03:39,960 --> 00:03:44,800
Speaker 2: Predetermined environment, characters interacting within that space, following those rules.

81
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,479
Speaker 1: Right, and perhaps our universe operates in a similar way.

82
00:03:48,199 --> 00:03:51,639
The laws of physics are just the game mechanics, and.

83
00:03:51,520 --> 00:03:55,599
Speaker 2: We're the players or maybe the characters navigating this virtual world.

84
00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:57,840
Speaker 1: So the speed of light, for example, what if.

85
00:03:57,759 --> 00:04:00,000
Speaker 2: It's not an absolute limit, but rather just a hart

86
00:04:00,159 --> 00:04:03,080
coded constraint set by the simulation's programmers.

87
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,280
Speaker 1: It's like hitting the invisible wall in a video game.

88
00:04:05,479 --> 00:04:07,560
It makes you stop and think, Okay, there's something else

89
00:04:07,599 --> 00:04:08,199
going on here.

90
00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:11,879
Speaker 2: Precisely, and if our universe is a simulation, it opens

91
00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:15,000
up a whole Pandora's box of intriguing.

92
00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:16,959
Speaker 1: Question like glitches in the matrix exactly.

93
00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:19,480
Speaker 2: Have you ever heard of the Mandela effect? Oh?

94
00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:21,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a rabbit hole I've gone down a few

95
00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:21,920
times myself.

96
00:04:21,959 --> 00:04:25,519
Speaker 2: It's named after Nelson Mandela, of course, and it describes

97
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,079
a phenomenon where large groups of people share a distinct

98
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:30,800
memory of an event.

99
00:04:30,959 --> 00:04:35,360
Speaker 1: Something that, according to documented history, never actually happen.

100
00:04:35,519 --> 00:04:37,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like a collective glitch in the matrix.

101
00:04:38,079 --> 00:04:40,439
Speaker 1: Give us some examples. I'm sure our listeners have experienced

102
00:04:40,439 --> 00:04:41,519
a few of these themselves.

103
00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:45,199
Speaker 2: Oh, definitely. The Mandela example itself is a big one.

104
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:48,319
Many people vividly remember him dying in prison in the

105
00:04:48,399 --> 00:04:51,720
nineteen eighties, but he actually lived until twenty thirteen.

106
00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:56,879
Speaker 1: Right. And then there's the Berenstein Bears versus Berenstein Bears debate.

107
00:04:57,600 --> 00:04:59,560
Countless people swear it was spelled.

108
00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:02,199
Speaker 2: With an inn despite all the evidence pointing to aim.

109
00:05:02,360 --> 00:05:05,759
Speaker 1: Wait really, Barren Stain, I swear I remember it with

110
00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:06,199
an im.

111
00:05:06,399 --> 00:05:08,600
Speaker 2: It's uncanny, isn't it. And don't even get me started

112
00:05:08,639 --> 00:05:10,920
on the Darth Vader quote, Luke, I am your father.

113
00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:14,600
So many people remember it that way, but the actual line, no,

114
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:17,360
I am your father, No Luke at all.

115
00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:18,480
Speaker 1: You're messing with me.

116
00:05:18,639 --> 00:05:21,439
Speaker 2: Nope, it's true. I know. It's enough to make you

117
00:05:21,519 --> 00:05:24,360
question your sanity, let alone reality for sure.

118
00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:28,240
Speaker 1: Now, of course, there are explanations for these beyond fimulation theory.

119
00:05:28,879 --> 00:05:33,160
Memories notoriously unreliable, and we all know how easily misinformation

120
00:05:33,199 --> 00:05:34,920
can spread, especially online.

121
00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:38,360
Speaker 2: Absolutely, but the sheer scale and consistency of some of

122
00:05:38,399 --> 00:05:41,160
these shared false memories is hard to ignore. It's like

123
00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:43,600
reality itself has shifted.

124
00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:45,240
Speaker 1: Leaving these little inconsistencies in its wake.

125
00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:50,680
Speaker 2: Exactly, And if we are living in a simulation, these mandela,

126
00:05:51,399 --> 00:05:52,800
the versions of the program.

127
00:05:52,519 --> 00:05:55,399
Speaker 1: Or intentional tweaks designed to test our perception.

128
00:05:55,319 --> 00:05:57,000
Speaker 2: It's a fascinating thought experiment.

129
00:05:57,319 --> 00:05:59,680
Speaker 1: So are all those little discrepancies we brush off in

130
00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:01,639
our daily just subtle hints that we're living in a

131
00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:02,800
simulated reality.

132
00:06:03,040 --> 00:06:06,360
Speaker 2: It's enough to make you second guess everything. But all right,

133
00:06:06,399 --> 00:06:09,319
let's zoom out from those weird glitches and look at

134
00:06:09,319 --> 00:06:12,800
the bigger picture, the universe itself. Have you ever noticed

135
00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:15,160
how many patterns repeat in nature?

136
00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:20,480
Speaker 1: Well? Yeah, absolutely, Like you see spirals everywhere, like galaxies

137
00:06:20,519 --> 00:06:21,079
and seashells.

138
00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,720
Speaker 2: It's crazy, right, Like the Fibonacci sequence, where every number

139
00:06:24,759 --> 00:06:29,199
is just the two before it added up sunflowers, nautilus shells,

140
00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:31,319
even the way branches grow on trees.

141
00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:34,000
Speaker 1: And then you've got that golden ratio, that one point

142
00:06:34,079 --> 00:06:36,920
sixty one eight number that seems to be everywhere.

143
00:06:36,399 --> 00:06:40,000
Speaker 2: From the proportions of the human body to ancient architecture.

144
00:06:40,399 --> 00:06:43,160
Speaker 1: It almost feels like someone just copy pasted it everywhere.

145
00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:44,800
It's too perfect to be random.

146
00:06:45,079 --> 00:06:48,160
Speaker 2: You know, it's definitely remarkable, and some people think it

147
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:52,959
points to like an underlying code, a blueprint for reality itself.

148
00:06:53,079 --> 00:06:56,360
Speaker 1: So are you saying there's like a cosmic architect, some

149
00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,839
grand designer who set all these mathematical constants in motion.

150
00:07:00,199 --> 00:07:02,839
Speaker 2: It's a tempting thought, isn't it. And it's not just

151
00:07:02,879 --> 00:07:06,000
pretty patterns either. There's a physicist, James Gates, who was

152
00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:08,759
actually pretty skeptical about simulation theory at first.

153
00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:09,720
Speaker 1: What changed his mind.

154
00:07:09,839 --> 00:07:12,920
Speaker 2: He was studying the math behind sub atomic particles, really

155
00:07:12,959 --> 00:07:13,519
deep stuff.

156
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:15,120
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, way over my head.

157
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:17,959
Speaker 2: But while he's doing that, he finds something crazy, what

158
00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:21,279
looks like error correcting code, the kind you find in

159
00:07:21,319 --> 00:07:22,519
computer programming.

160
00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:25,079
Speaker 1: Wait, you're saying there's computer code baked into the very

161
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:26,199
fabric of reality.

162
00:07:26,399 --> 00:07:28,439
Speaker 2: It sounds nuts, right, But that's what he found. It's

163
00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:31,279
a discovery that's really shaking things up in the scientific community.

164
00:07:31,959 --> 00:07:34,720
Speaker 1: So it's like the random static on a TV screen

165
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:38,720
turns out to be a secret message, except this message

166
00:07:38,879 --> 00:07:41,319
is like the building blocks of the universe.

167
00:07:41,399 --> 00:07:44,600
Speaker 2: It's wild. And since we're talking about mind blowing discoveries,

168
00:07:44,639 --> 00:07:46,879
we have to talk about the double slit experiment.

169
00:07:46,959 --> 00:07:50,839
Speaker 1: Ooh, yes, I've heard about this. Uh huh, something about

170
00:07:50,839 --> 00:07:54,279
shooting particles through slits. I'm not sure I fully get it, though.

171
00:07:54,839 --> 00:07:58,199
Speaker 2: So picture this. You've got a wall with two slits

172
00:07:58,199 --> 00:08:01,600
in it. You start shooting these tiny particles like electrons

173
00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:04,680
at the wall. Okay, got it, and behind the wall

174
00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:08,079
is a screen that detects where the electrons land. You'd

175
00:08:08,079 --> 00:08:10,680
expect to see two bands of electrons on the screen, right.

176
00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:13,000
Speaker 1: Yeah, one for each slit makes sense.

177
00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:15,399
Speaker 2: But that's not what happens. Instead of two bands, you

178
00:08:15,439 --> 00:08:19,360
get this interference pattern like waves waves. Yeah, it's as

179
00:08:19,399 --> 00:08:22,879
if each electron is going through both slits at the

180
00:08:22,879 --> 00:08:25,399
same time and interfering with itself, like it's a wave

181
00:08:25,439 --> 00:08:26,079
not a particle.

182
00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:28,399
Speaker 1: Wait, how can something be in two places at once?

183
00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:31,399
Speaker 2: That's the crazy thing about quantum mechanics. It throws all

184
00:08:31,480 --> 00:08:33,399
our everyday logic out the window.

185
00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:35,320
Speaker 1: Okay, but it gets weirder.

186
00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:38,559
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, So scientists try to figure out which slit

187
00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:41,919
each electron goes through. They set up a detector.

188
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:44,360
Speaker 1: To watch, so they're spying on the electrons exactly.

189
00:08:44,720 --> 00:08:47,840
Speaker 2: But as soon as they do that, the interference pattern vanishes.

190
00:08:47,960 --> 00:08:50,120
You get the two bands like normal particles.

191
00:08:50,279 --> 00:08:53,320
Speaker 1: So just by observing it, they change how the electrons behave.

192
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,679
Speaker 2: It's like reality itself changes depending on whether we're looking

193
00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:58,159
or not. Super spooky.

194
00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,879
Speaker 1: That's crazy. How does this fit into the whole simulation theory?

195
00:09:02,399 --> 00:09:05,320
Speaker 2: Well, think about it. If our reality is a simulation,

196
00:09:05,919 --> 00:09:08,960
it wouldn't be very efficient to render everything all the time.

197
00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:10,639
Speaker 1: Right, Like a video game only shows you what.

198
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,600
Speaker 2: You need to see exactly. So maybe the universe only

199
00:09:13,639 --> 00:09:17,039
renders what's being observed. Saves processing power.

200
00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:20,440
Speaker 1: So the double slit experiment is like catching the simulation

201
00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:23,279
red handed. It's showing us how the program works.

202
00:09:23,559 --> 00:09:26,600
Speaker 2: That's one way to think about it. It suggests that consciousness,

203
00:09:26,639 --> 00:09:30,200
the act of observing, is somehow intertwined with the very

204
00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:34,519
fabric of reality, which is a pretty mind blowing thought.

205
00:09:34,759 --> 00:09:38,159
Speaker 1: It's like our consciousness is the cursor deciding which parts

206
00:09:38,159 --> 00:09:41,320
of the program get rendered. Okay, so we've talked about

207
00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:44,559
glitches and this weird quantum stuff. But if we're in

208
00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:47,600
a simulation, who created it? What's their deal?

209
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:51,360
Speaker 2: That's the big question, isn't it? And honestly, we don't

210
00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:53,799
have a clue. But it's interesting to think about how

211
00:09:53,879 --> 00:09:57,919
this idea of simulation creators overlaps with the idea of God.

212
00:09:58,039 --> 00:10:00,759
Speaker 1: You're saying, are we just swapping one all powerful entity

213
00:10:00,759 --> 00:10:01,120
for another?

214
00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:05,039
Speaker 2: It's a thought, right, both represent a force beyond our understanding,

215
00:10:05,159 --> 00:10:08,120
shaping reality. Whether you call them God or programmers, the

216
00:10:08,120 --> 00:10:10,080
basic concept is kind of similar.

217
00:10:09,759 --> 00:10:11,639
Speaker 1: A higher power pulling the strings.

218
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:14,039
Speaker 2: And it raises questions about free will. If our actions

219
00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:17,159
are just code being executed, do we actually have a choice?

220
00:10:17,279 --> 00:10:20,039
Speaker 1: Whoa yeah? Like, are we just characters following a script?

221
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:22,080
Speaker 2: And if we are in a simulation, does it make

222
00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:25,399
our experiences less real? Does it diminish our lives?

223
00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:27,240
Speaker 1: Good questions? What do you think?

224
00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:32,360
Speaker 2: Honestly, even if everything around us is artificial, our experiences,

225
00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:36,000
our feelings, they're real to us. We laugh, we cry,

226
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:39,600
we connect, that's genuine No matter what. It really makes

227
00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:43,279
you wonder what if we're the ones building simulations someday.

228
00:10:43,039 --> 00:10:46,159
Speaker 1: It's not impossible, right, Look how fast technology is evolving.

229
00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:50,480
Speaker 2: Think about Moore's law. Computing power doubles like every eighteen months.

230
00:10:50,519 --> 00:10:51,399
It's insane.

231
00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:54,240
Speaker 1: So if that keeps up, even if it slows down

232
00:10:54,279 --> 00:10:58,480
a little, we could be creating crazy realistic simulations in

233
00:10:58,519 --> 00:10:59,440
the future.

234
00:10:59,279 --> 00:11:01,879
Speaker 2: Indistinguished from base reality.

235
00:11:02,039 --> 00:11:03,960
Speaker 1: It's kind of scary to think about, right, I mean,

236
00:11:04,039 --> 00:11:07,519
look at video games now compared to like thirty years ago.

237
00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:10,039
It's a whole different world. Imagine what they'll be like

238
00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:11,159
in one hundred years, and what.

239
00:11:11,120 --> 00:11:14,639
Speaker 2: About a thousand years or a million. It's mind blowing.

240
00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:17,200
We could literally be creating universes.

241
00:11:17,399 --> 00:11:19,879
Speaker 1: It's like we're on the verge of becoming like digital gods,

242
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,519
creating life in these simulated worlds. But then it makes

243
00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:25,919
you wonder, if we can do that, doesn't it mean

244
00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:27,759
someone else could already done it to us?

245
00:11:27,879 --> 00:11:31,320
Speaker 2: Full circle right back to that question, are we the simulation?

246
00:11:31,799 --> 00:11:35,559
It really challenges everything we think we know about the universe,

247
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:37,799
makes you rethink our place in it all.

248
00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,639
Speaker 1: It's humbling, that's for sure. But even if we are

249
00:11:41,759 --> 00:11:45,080
just some experiment in a giant computer program, does that

250
00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:46,720
mean our lives are less meaningful.

251
00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:50,519
Speaker 2: That's a personal question, I think, But for me, it

252
00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:53,960
doesn't change how I feel about things. The emotions we experience,

253
00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,360
the connections we make, those are real, even if the

254
00:11:57,399 --> 00:11:59,039
world around us is artificial.

255
00:11:59,279 --> 00:12:01,679
Speaker 1: Yeah, I get that. Like we still laugh, we still cry,

256
00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:03,919
we still fall in love. That sus real no.

257
00:12:03,919 --> 00:12:06,720
Speaker 2: Matter what exactly. And I think the very fact that

258
00:12:06,759 --> 00:12:09,240
we can even ask these questions, that we're curious about

259
00:12:09,240 --> 00:12:11,360
the nature of reality, that says something about us.

260
00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:14,679
Speaker 1: It shows were always trying to learn, to explore, to understand.

261
00:12:14,799 --> 00:12:17,120
And maybe that's the whole point, whether we're in a

262
00:12:17,159 --> 00:12:18,000
simulation or not.

263
00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:20,759
Speaker 2: Maybe the journey is more important than the destination.

264
00:12:21,399 --> 00:12:23,399
Speaker 1: Well, I think we've given everyone a lot to think

265
00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:26,840
about today. From the Big Bang to the Mandela Effect

266
00:12:27,039 --> 00:12:30,600
to those creepy double slits in the Fermi paradox, we've

267
00:12:30,639 --> 00:12:32,519
explored some pretty wild ideas today.

268
00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:35,559
Speaker 2: We've gone deep down the rabbit hole of simulation theory.

269
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:38,759
Speaker 1: So what do you all think? Have we convinced you

270
00:12:38,799 --> 00:12:41,559
that we're living in a computer program or have we

271
00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:43,639
just left you with more questions than answers.

272
00:12:44,639 --> 00:12:47,120
Speaker 2: Either way, head over to our website or social media

273
00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:48,759
and let us know what stood out to you.

274
00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:50,840
Speaker 1: We'd love to hear your thoughts.

275
00:12:50,519 --> 00:12:53,360
Speaker 2: And until next time, keep looking up at those stars

276
00:12:53,399 --> 00:12:57,720
and wondering the universe is a pretty amazing place, simulated

277
00:12:57,799 --> 00:13:00,399
Speaker 1: Or not, and keep those minds open because you never

278
00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:03,919
know what might be lurking just beyond the edges of reality.