Speaker 1: And hello, how are you happy Tuesday to you. Today's
the twenty ninth day of July, year of Our Lord,
twenty twenty five. My name is Tom Sullivan, and we've
got a lot to talk about today. We can start
with the top story, obviously, was from last night, was
the shooting not only here in New York City, but
just a couple of blocks down the street from where
I am, and I travel by there all the time,
and it happened right about the time that I'm usually
leaving the studios, so kind of struck home. And that
was the shooting at the building on Park Avenue which
houses KPMG accounting firm Blackstone. The NFL headquarters are there,
and that looks like maybe that's what the guy was
looking for. So let's start off with Jessica Tish, the
New York Police Department Commissioner, as she describes what we
downed last night.
Speaker 2: The shooter is believed to be Shane Timora, a twenty
seven year old male with a Las Vegas address. The
vehicle he exited is registered in Nevada to mister Tamora.
Inside of that vehicle, officers found a rifle case with rounds,
a loaded revolver, ammunition in magazines, a backpack, and medication
prescribed to mister Tamora.
Speaker 1: She think goes on to talk about as the NYPD
commissioner talk about the police officer who was gunned down
in the lobby of that building, it's he's got two
children and a wife. She's pregnant with a third child.
He's been with the police department for three years. And
one of the people that we're going to be playing
here talks about the fact that he normally is stationed
in the Bronx, in one of the highest crime districts
in New York City, where it's a much more dangerous beat,
and the fact that he was working over time to
get some extra money to support his family on Park
Avenue in a corporate building. What could possibly happen? Well,
you never know, do you back to Jessica Tish the commissioner.
Speaker 2: He was doing the job that we asked him to do.
He put himself in harm's way. He made the ultimate sacrifice,
shot in cold blood, wearing a uniform that stood for
the promise that he made to this city.
Speaker 1: The commissioner mention that the shooter in this case is
from Nevada. He drove across the country in like two
and a half days. I've driven that route. I was
a little above the speed limit sometimes and I did
it in four So this guy must have been awake
on something to keep him going to get there. But
he drove from Las Vegas to New York City directly
to this building and got out, double parked his car,
got out, abandoned the car on Park Avenue, and walked
calmly into the building and started shooting the fact that
he's from Nevada also brings up the fact. So this
shooting last night here in New York City, you have
five dead, including the shooter. In Nevada. On Monday, Monday morning,
at seven twenty five in the morning, outside of one
of the big casinos in Reno, Nevada, you had another
random shooting. A guy comes up into the valley area
in front of the Grand Sierra Resort and just started
shooting people. Three are dead there and two are in
critical condition. So it doesn't matter whether you're in Reno,
Nevada or in New York City. Or there's a couple
who was hiking with their kids in an Arkansas state
park that were killed. So it's this randomness that you
just don't know where it's going to happen. So this guy,
this twenty seven year old drove from Nevada, got to
the building, went in, started shooting people right away in
the lobby, then went to the elevator bank. How he
got there. This brings up a whole question about building
security in New York because most buildings have very tight security.
He went to the wrong elevator bank and wound up
on the thirty third floor. In his pocket he had
a three page handwritten letter about the fact that he
was convinced that he was a high school football player
in southern California that from those concussions, those head hits
that he has CTE. And we'll check in with a
doctor on the whole business about CTE, which I want
to explore as well. So there's a lot to go
over here with this. Here's the Mayor Eric Adams talking
about it.
Speaker 3: He alluded to having CTE from playing in the NFL.
He never played in the NFL. With going through the
suicide note to a zero in on the exact reason,
but at this time it appears as though something that
is attached to his belief he experienced cte from playing
in the NFL.
Speaker 1: So no, he never played for the NFL, but he
looked like that's what he was targeting. The NFL is
headquartered in this particular building. Paul Morrow, former nybt PDE lieutenant,
also has these observations.
Speaker 4: Okay, so Alexis has the basic facts accurately. He drove
from Las Vegas a couple of days straight. Maybe he
stopped along the way, maybe not. He got here awfully quickly,
so it looks like he managed to stay up a
lot of that time. There where drugs in the car.
Maybe he took something to keep himself awake. According to
my reporting that I'm receiving, it's two drugs that he
had in the car, look like prescription drugs. He also
may have had some marijuana. Weed these days is very
very powerful. Some people's are a comment on his demeanor
as he walked up that block, he walked into the lobby,
he seemed to be maybe very determined, very focused, So
there may have been some narcotics there. He had two
mental health incidents in Nevada, that's gonna matter. He had
another gun in the car, as she mentioned it to
three point fifty seven, A big gun. Why he doesn't
bring that gun in with him and then commits suicide
with a long gun is a very difficult enterprise, So
that's a question we wonder about that. His CTE situation, though,
is what's emerging, at least in his mind as the motive,
and I think that's the scient aspect of things. He
apparently believed that and blamed the NFL for covering up
the idea that the hits that you take to the
head from playing football can cause CTE. He believes he
suffered from CTE. He seems to have known he was
going to die because he wanted the doctors to quote unquote,
to study his brain. And it seems like there was
a particular thing that he watched, a documentary of some
sort that triggered this idea in him that the NFL
is to blame, and he goes to that building, I
guess seeking out the NFL. One last thing I would
say is about it. There's a lot of questions about
why he went to the thirty third floor. The NFL
wasn't even on that floor. Could be he just botched up,
But also my understanding is on that floor there were
a lot of administrative offices for the various enterprises that
exist in that building, So he may have been thinking
he was going to sort of the executive suite, that
kind of thing.
Speaker 1: Paul was also asked about the way it works with
the NYPD. How this officer was in uniform in the
lobby of this building working overtime.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is a heartbreaking thing. So cops very often
have to supplement their income, especially early in their careers.
And so at one point the police department tweaked to
the fact that a lot of police would be working
at bars restaurants outside off duty, and it created some
messy situations because they have to take police action. And
the question became, now will the city indemnify them for
the fact that they were working as a bouncer.
Speaker 5: Let's say.
Speaker 4: So, what they put in place is I think called
the paid detail. It allows the cops to wear the uniform,
which is the key, and they can go and work
under indemnification as uniform cops, but it's off duty, just
to make some extra money. Here's a cop, he's got
two kids, he's got another one on the way, his
wife's pregnant, and so he's trying to supplement his income
off duty doing paid detail standing in a lobby here,
and this was what he gets for.
Speaker 1: And here's an eyewitness who was just going home last
night and got caught up in the middle of his
whole thing.
Speaker 6: Walking home, going to Grand Central to take the train home,
and about six twenty and all of a sudden, I
had headphones on, and all of a sudden, there's a
rush of people running past me, and more so than
just a couple of people. So I took my headphones off,
and somebody said gunshots shooting. The police had their guns
drawn for a long time. I did hear a few gunshots,
and then officers started flooding the area.
Speaker 1: You hear what he said. He had his headphones on
and he didn't hear anything, and then all of a
sudden saw the people in the commotion, and he took
his headphones off and heard the gunshots. There's a professor
that over at NYU. That's a lot of professor was
talking about when if you look at people today, they're
walking around with their with their eyes focused in on
their on their phones. They're looking at that or in
this ty's case, he had headphones on. They're not listening
or paying attention to anything going around going on around them,
and and that is why people say, well, how did
this guy had this long gun just casually walk into
this building. Well, it wasn't that far. He double parked
on Park Avenue. He probably had I don't know, one
hundred feet two hundred feet to go through the entrants
until he got to the front doors of the building.
And people weren't paying any attention. They don't look at
each other, they're looking at their phones or they're listening
to their headphones.
Speaker 5: Well, broadly speaking, security in our high rise buildings tends
to be effective. It's effective in its execution of its purpose.
The purpose of security is to challenge people who enter
the building and to assist the occupants of the building
and evacuating building and keeping them safe from all types
of hazards. The purpose of security in a building is
actually not to confront armed folks who enter the building.
They are just not enough people available with that type
of training and who are licensed to carry firearms to
go around. What's also interesting you mentioned the photo. A
good friend of mine who is also a retired police officer,
just mentioned to me, think about how many New Yorkers
bury their heads in their cell phones you know, there's
a question of how is he able to just walk
so freely into the building and no one said anything. Well,
next time you go outside, look at how many folks
are just looking at their phones, at text messages and
emails and so forth, and not necessarily pay attention, paying
attention to their surroundings. But I don't think we have
necessarily an issue with security in our high rise buildings. Yeah.
Speaker 1: That was Burke Halter, who is a former NYPD He
teaches now over at NYU. John Miller, former NYPD guy,
counterintelligence guy. This is what he had to say.
Speaker 7: So what we have with the gunman is we've got
the beginning of his life, born in California's time in Hawaii,
comes back to California, living in Las Vegas. But the
beginning is all about football. I mean, when you go
into his social media, he is reliving his junior varsity
high school career, his football player of the game, you know,
player of the month. That seemed to be a very
big part of his life. We know the end of
the story, we're missing the middle. We know he worked
as a security guard. We know he got a security
guard license in California, that he had a security job
in Las Vegas, that he got a private investigator's license,
that he obtained a concealed carry permit, so we know
he was trying to find his way in the security business.
But somewhere between the beginning, which was all about football,
and the end, which was all about his perception that
in injury he thinks he may have received during his
childhood football career, was the animist that brought him to
the NFL building and ended up in the wrong office,
killing innocent people and wounding others as he went. We
still have some to fill in. Really today the story
will shift to the victims. You have that Blackstone employee,
a serious loss to a company that occupied so much
of that building. You have a woman who worked for
Rudent Management who apparently was executed as he came into
the offices when he got off at that thirty third
floor before he went down the floor and killed himself.
You have, of course, the story of the police officer.
And think about this, three and a half years on
the job. He's in the forty seventh precinct, that is
a very busy and sometimes very dangerous precinct in the
bra and the fact that working a day off on
a paid security detail in a Park Avenue lobby. I
guarantee that was the safest thing he did all week.
What could possibly go on in the lobby of a
Park Avenue tower that's you know, headquarters to Corporate America.
But this is part of being a police officer, which
is anything can happen anywhere, anytime, anyhow. And he was
caught in that terrible moment, you know, which is a
real loss.
Speaker 1: Juliet KM used to be with the FBI. She has
this to say so, and.
Speaker 8: This is all the questions that one has to ask
so that these buildings are better fortified, not simply that
there's blame or necessarily blame one. I was surprised how
little perimeter security there seemed to be as you're as
he's heading into that office. Of course, we always recognize
that there's the security guards at the at the at
the door or inside the door, because they're taking your
driver's license before you can get into the elevator bank.
But if he's breached that already, then of course there's
almost there's no ability to stop him once because he
got on the elevator bank. In fact, the fact that
he committed suicide is honestly fortuitous, because we don't know
how easily it would have been for him to just
get onto a stairwell go to the thirty second floor,
thirty first floor. So that's what we look at. And
as John said, also the car factor. We leave a car, generally,
we all have experienced that there's a lot of police
presence that surrounds you. The second is, of course the
potential target. We're going to be very careful here. He
self describes as something related to CTE And obviously the
NFL is in this building, so people investigators are putting
two and two together if that was the target. In
this way, it's a little bit like United Health. I mean,
in the sense that someone has a grievance and is
going after a corporate target. We don't know who the
target was at the NFL, but this is something that
has been scaring corporate enemies and institutions for that matter,
in terms of the kind of violence that they can
face directly for a harm that people perceive is exacerbated
by that company.
Speaker 1: I get her associating the shooting with the United Health shooting.
The CEO that was shot down outside the Hilton Hotel
back in December. That was a particular executive who was targeted,
and Luigi waited and did all of his homework to
find out where he would be and when he would
be there. This is different. He was shooting at innocent
civilians in the lobby that had nothing to do with
the NFL. If he was going to go try to
get mad at the NFL, he first of all didn't
get to their floors. Secondly, he's just started killing people
that had nothing to do with them. So no, this
is a cold blooded killer. That's with this whole thing.
Chris Swecker, former assistant director of the FBI. He also
when he retired, he became the head of security for
all a Bank of America, has some interesting comments to
make as well.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I mean, each each individual building has their own security,
and then of course the NYPD has responsibility for the
streets and and and just overall policing. Having been the
head of security for Bank of America and also being
a I was on a board of a Blackstone owned
company and attended many meetings there. My theory is that he,
you know, he blew. He was expecting more resistance and
he didn't get any. You know, he before he got
into the building. You know, we we eliminated bank robberies
almost virtually eliminated bank robberies by putting security outside the
building where where they're visible and they're deterrent and they
can actually protect people from in, you know, inside and
and act as up a buffer before a bad guy
with bad intentions can get in side of building. Not
armshair quarterbacking here, but I you know, the security is
going to be effective. They can be inside a building
because that by the time a shooter gets inside a building,
they're already committed. But if they see an officer outside,
they can either you know, act as that buffer, or
they will not. They'll go go back to their car.
You know, he wanted to get into that building. If
he saw more resistance, he may have backed away. Yeah,
I mean that that particular plaza has a has a
recessed fountain there that covers a lot of the big
part of the plaza. And after nine to eleven, ballards
went up everywhere in the city in front of in
front of these buildings. But ballards would not have stopped him.
He's on foot. I go back again to there's there's
two things that you can get in, you know, when
he watch starts talking about prevention and the terms one
is red flags people that know him and and well
if they see bizarre behavior and this type of intention
and they report it too. Is again a visible security
guard outside the premises. You see a Bank of America
branch right there as well.
Speaker 5: I'm surprised there.
Speaker 9: Wasn't a security guard outside the bank because that's the
way we left it. When I left Bank of America,
was any high risk branch was going to have an
armed security guard outside. If they're inside, there are no
deterrence and they're they're really not that effective. No disrespect
to anyone inside that building. They were ambushed, they never
saw it coming and their heroes. But in this case,
this is about corporate security and private security and how
they work with the police department. Police are on the streets.
You know, they're not going to stand in front of
every building. They just can't be everywhere. So corporate security
has a responsibility and building managers have a responsibility to
put a security guard outside the building.
Speaker 1: So none of these people are coming out explicitly insane it.
But it's pretty clear. You listen between the lines and
you'll hear them basically say this building was not adequately protected.
And most of the high rises in New York City,
especially in Midtown, but all through the city, they have
lots that we have probably I go through maybe five
or six security layers to get to this studio every day.
We have some uniform officers outside. I presume they're off
duty being paid like this officer was. We have undercover
officers in the lobby. We have doors you can't get
through without getting without having a card. You can't get
on the elevators without having a card, you can't get
off the floor where you want to go without having
a car. Goes on and on and on. So I
don't know what they were thinking about regarding this building,
but I think what I heard from all of this
was he really the building wasn't all that secure. Twenty
four NYPD killed since nine to eleven. It's a dangerous
job the clients in the building. Like I said, KPMG
is at one of the big accounting firms in the nation, Blackstone,
one of the big investment firms. A young woman that
works there who is the head of their real estate portfolios.
She was killed. Was just she came off the elevator
into the lobby. She was going to go meet a
friend to go have a drink after work, and she
got off the elevator and he killed her. Another elevator
opened up that he got on. He got on the
wrong elevator bank and there was a woman walking off
of that elevator that he just walked by, got on
the elevator, didn't do anything to her. So he wasn't
of sound mind to say the very least. So again,
it's like I said. In Reno, Nevada, they had the
shooting in front of the seven twenty five in the morning,
in front of the Grand what is it called, Grand
Sierra Resort. Three dead, two in critical condition. You've got
the couple hiking with their children in Arkansas State Park
who were killed. So life is fragile. That's all this
stuff really comes down to. Since we're talking about terrible things,
let's go to Gaza. Because the story that is changing
the hearts of a lot of people in this country
is the story of people starving. And when you see,
especially children starving, it touches the hearts of many, many people.
So the attitude about letting aid get into the starving
people of Gaza has changed policy and President Trump has
taken a completely different look at this from what the
bb net and Yahoo was doing, and so aid is
the now starting to flow in. Harry Enton did some
polling about this exact topic.
Speaker 10: Yeah, you know, Benjamin Net and Yahoo. If you look
at polling in the United States, he has lost in
the court of public opinion. I want you to take
a look here at his net favorable rating. It is
the lowest on record according to Gallup, and they have
records going all the way back since the nineteen nineties.
What are we talking about here, Well, on in April of
twenty nineteen, before obviously Israel in Gaza in the latest
war that's.
Speaker 5: Been going on for a long time. Benjamin N.
Speaker 10: Yah, who was on the positive side at plus thirteen points,
Look at where he is today minus twenty three points.
My goodness, gracious you look at those under the age
of thirty five. His Net favrile rating at this point,
get this, fifty three points under water, my god. And
this of course has everything to do with Israel's actions
in Gaza. The American people at this particular point not
exactly liking what they're seeing, and they believe that Benjamin
D and Yahoo is in large part responsibile. Yeah, so
let's take a look at this, I mean net approval
Israel's military acts in Gazi. You go back to November
of twenty twenty three, so on the positive side of the
ledger plus five points.
Speaker 5: I bet if you can go back a little bit further,
be a little bit higher.
Speaker 10: But gallup only measured in November of twenty twenty three
at plus five points. Look at here where we are
in July of twenty twenty five, way down there at
minus twenty eight points among those under the age of
thirty five. Get this a negative seventy three point net
approval rating.
Speaker 5: This is all being led.
Speaker 10: All the negative opinions towards Israel's and their acts in
Guys are being led by the younger folks in the
electra negative seventy three points and then approver rating. You
rarely ever see numbers dow low, and that is charging
up this number twenty eight points underwater the net approval
rating of Israel's military acts in Gods of the American
people do not like what they're seeing and increasingly dislike
what they're seeing. So you know, for the longest period
of time Americans have sympathized more with the Israelis than
the Palaestinians. That's still the case, but it's only by
plus five. You go back to May of twenty twenty four,
was plus seventeen. Right after October seventh, look at this
was plus forty in twenty seventeen, it was plus thirty
nine points. That is a dramatic drop, that is what
is that a forty three point drop since the aftermath
of October seventh and again under the age of fifty
you look at those younger voters, it was plus thirty eight.
Israelis back all the way back in twenty seventeen. You
look now it is plus nineteen Palestinians. There has simply
put been a complete change of opinion on this topic,
and it has been at least driven in large part
by how Americans view the military actions of Israel and.
Speaker 1: God, yeah, all the photos of starving people in videos.
People don't like that. It's a bad look. Brett McGirk
has served for presidents and covered this the Middle East
and North Africa, and this is his take on the
diplomatic argument regarding Gaza.
Speaker 11: First, I think the president's right to say that, and
I think it's right to just call out exactly what's happening.
But this is a shift in the US policy because
if you go back the last six months, the Trump
administration kind of enabled a lot of things the Israelis
did that. When I was working on this file, we
simply did not permit. There was a ten week siege
almost seventy seven days, a total blockade of Israel of
Gaza by Israel, which really led to this cataclysmic set
of events. And what has happened now, clearly the US
has put pressure on Israel to make sure that UN
provided aid is getting back in there with localized cease fires.
That has to happen. I have to say, when every
morning at seven point thirty, no matter what else was
happening in this crisis, we had a call on the
humanitarian situation and the aid situation. We as senior coordinator
at the State Department, worked this every single day. We
had experts from USAID working this every single day. Where
there was a problem or bottleneck, we would try to
resolve it. Often Israel and the UN disagree, We try
to come in try to resolve It's hard. I'm not
saying that record is perfect and focus. The Trump administration
got rid of that senior coordinator position. They abolish USAID
and you really just kind of lost the attention and
focus on this. That's returning now. That's important because to
your question, no matter what happens in the talks, the
aid has to flow. That's non negotiable. The aid has
to flow. And then you try to get back to
the ceasefire talks. We have to get the ceasefire in place,
and it was close. Hamas hardness demands you got to
stay at it. Hamas is the main obstacle to a
ceasefire deal.
Speaker 5: Again.
Speaker 11: We just saw that again last week. Everybody thought we're
moving towards a deal. I'm told my understanding, the HAMAS
leadership in Doha was ready to accept a deal, and
the guys in Gaza said no. The guys holding the
hostages said no, let's harden our positions. So Hamas is
the obstacle to a deal. Second, Hamas does benefit directly
in some ways and indirectly from the flow of aid,
None of that matters. You have to get aid flowing
because if you don't, what happens is you play into
the hands of Hamas. All attention now and that polling
that was just showed by John. It's all focused now
is on Israel and not on Hamas. So this has
been a real catastrophic decision. That blockade earlier this year,
it was a mistake. It's being fixed on the talks.
You need a concerted international effort to try to get
this done. And who has influenced over Hamas. It's Cutter,
It's Egypt, it's Turkey. I read this morning Hamas leaders
are on their way to Turkey. I hope we're talking
to President Erdawan. Hamas. Accept this deal, get the cease fireplace,
get relief to the people of Gaza. That is the
fastest way out of this. And you just got to
stay at it and try to get this done every
single day.
Speaker 1: Since we're talking about the world, there's some other world
news here today. First of all, Secretary Scott Bessant and
Jamis and Greer, who are the We're over in Stockholm,
Sweden talking to China about a deal about trade. And
when they came out of that, there was two reporting.
One was that they concluded the meeting without a deal.
It sounded very negative. But late this afternoon President Trump
said that he talked to Scott Bessant, and that Besont
felt good about the meeting and that they're now talking
about extending the deadline for China trade talks. Meantime, another deadline.
Donald Trump gave Russia fifty days to come up with
a ceasefire regarding Ukraine. Today you can tell the president's frustrated.
He changed it and he said, no, ten days. I'll
give him ten days until we lower the boom with
sanctions in tariffs. So we'll see what Russia does about this.
But now we're down to a ten day window for
Russia to respond. Jack Keene, these are his thoughts about Russia.
Speaker 12: Well, first of all, he's still attempting to have some
kind of a diplomatic solution here, and that he didn't
shut it completely down, which obviously he could have, and
he could have initially, and when he made the major
policy turnaround, which I think is starting to give up
on a diplomatic effort and willing to confront Rusher. And
that's what he's doing by providing military equipment to Ukraine.
And those of us have been looking at this for
a long time solely applaud that effort is something that's
really necessary, and now we have sanctions and potential tariffs,
and he's given them still a window here to come
to the table. But I think you know where the
president is at that time. If Putin doesn't respond, and
I suspect he will not, then we're going to see
the tariffs and the sanctions, and that'll be a departure
from the diplomatic effort and is underlining the fact that
he's now wanting to confront Putin. And I think Putin
has miscalculated a little bit here. I think he really
believed that he was going to frustrate the President quite
a bit by delaying everything, and after all, we're already
looking for the thirty day cease fire and he's will
except unconditional, and he did frustrate the President quite a bit,
But the President didn't walk away from supporting Ukraine, which
is what Putin was hoping would take place. I didn't
think he knew for a fact what would take place,
but he was hoping for that outcome. It didn't happen,
So we have a major shift here to support Ukraine
and their objectives. I think that's very positive on a
part of the president. The patients he's shown here and
putting up with Putin's bluster, and you know, he's a
skilled liar, He's a trained KGB agent who uses lies
to change behavior. And I think he's had significant influence
over every president he's had to work with in his
twenty five years. That's a bit of an IOU, you know,
in terms of the five percent defense, in terms of
their commitment to purchase weapons from the United States and
provide them with Ukraine. Out of my mind about that happening.
And at the Rome meeting, which took place a week
to ten days ago, our US representatives were at that
meeting were pleasantly surprised by the Europeans commitment to Ukraine,
and they said, it's not a matter of money. We
have the money. We are all in here. We're going
to provide this support for them. So their commitment is real.
They have always seen the threat to themselves to their
own national security. A lot of misinformation out there about
European support. Actually, through the entire time of the war,
the support has been about even they've provided. The whole
European nation states beyond NATO provided about the same amount
of level of support that the United States has provided.
There's a lot of misrepresentation of those facts out there,
but where they are now, and there's particularly eight countries
that are absolutely committed to this and they see an
existential threat, and not too surprising, many of them were
former countries under the bell and control of the Soviet Union.
They lived it for forty five years. They want no
more part of it, and they're wanting to make certain
that the war ends in Ukraine. And after all, nobody
is losing any loss of life there, not the United States,
not the European country. We're just providing them weapons and
a fair amount of moral support, I think as well.
So the president is changing his policy right before our eyes.
And we don't know if Putin is going to come
to the negotiating table as a result of that. That's
not knowable, but we do know this, the previous policy
did not work with him. So let's try something different.
That's what a president is.
Speaker 1: A lot of international topics today, let's talk about our
domestic stock market today. So far markets have been on
a tear not today. The Dow fell two hundred and
four down to forty four thousand and six thirty two,
the S and P down nineteen, the Nasdaq down eighty
both of those coming off records with minor losses. The
price of gold went up fourteen dollars to thirty three
twenty four. The price of oil way up almost three
dollars higher, up to sixty nine dollars now for one
barrel of oil. That's it for today. Thanks for coming by.
We will have oh Tomorrow is the Fed will come
out and announce whether they're going to leave interest rates alone,
leave them unchanged, or drop them like the President would
like them to do. I'm going to bet on they're
leaving them unchanged, but we'll find out tomorrow. Thanks for
coming by, We will see you tomorrow