WEBVTT

1
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Welcome once again to another episode of The Oath and

2
00:00:13.359 --> 00:00:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the Office. I am John people sang, and right now

3
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:19.039
<v Speaker 1>we are witnessing a series of extraordinary clashes over the

4
00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, the separation of powers, fundamental democratic norms,

5
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and from what's being described as an extortion demand over

6
00:00:26.519 --> 00:00:30.839
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure to full on attacks on press freedom in Jersey

7
00:00:30.839 --> 00:00:33.039
<v Speaker 1>and New York. A federal judge just blocked an effort

8
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the Gateway Tunnel for a president's vanity.

9
00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The DOJ executed a search warrant at the home of

10
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a Washington Post reporter. What did these events say about

11
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the health of American constitutional democracy? I have no idea.

12
00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm a dopey comedian. That's why I lean on the

13
00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>star of our show, best selling author and professor, Corey Bretschneiter. Corey,

14
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it's good to see you, Welcome back.

15
00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>It's always a pleasure, John.

16
00:00:56.679 --> 00:00:59.039
<v Speaker 3>And as horrible as things get, I look forward to

17
00:00:59.039 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>this conversation every week.

18
00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:01.159
<v Speaker 2>It gives me hope.

19
00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:04.719
<v Speaker 3>And speaking of hope, we're gonna have after our discussion,

20
00:01:04.840 --> 00:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>a discussion with pre Berrara.

21
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:08.719
<v Speaker 2>His podcast is called Stay Tuned.

22
00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:11.079
<v Speaker 3>I hope you'll stay tuned for that and uh, you know,

23
00:01:11.319 --> 00:01:14.519
<v Speaker 3>it's an in depth conversation that we'll have with him

24
00:01:14.560 --> 00:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>about questions of integrity in the midst of such destruction.

25
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>And so let's get to the destruction.

26
00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:21.319
<v Speaker 4>Let's do it.

27
00:01:21.359 --> 00:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>You and pre Ferrara one on one is that's like,

28
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:26.519
<v Speaker 1>that's like pouring for the angels, Sir. That is just

29
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:28.519
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant conversation.

30
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:30.799
<v Speaker 3>But I Woanta, I want to before we get to there,

31
00:01:31.680 --> 00:01:34.079
<v Speaker 3>quote from like somebody famous or you just no.

32
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:35.439
<v Speaker 4>I just that's something I made up.

33
00:01:35.480 --> 00:01:39.799
<v Speaker 1>But let's before you get to your exalted conversation with

34
00:01:39.879 --> 00:01:42.239
<v Speaker 1>pret Burrara, come down to the mud with me for

35
00:01:42.280 --> 00:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit, Professor. Let's beget this because these current headlines

36
00:01:45.239 --> 00:01:48.079
<v Speaker 1>about the temporary restraining order to stop the shutdown of

37
00:01:48.120 --> 00:01:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the Gateway Tunnel project, which affects millions between New Jersey

38
00:01:52.239 --> 00:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and New York City in essence blocking a political move

39
00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to coerce state and local consent, I mean, Donald Trump

40
00:01:58.200 --> 00:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially came out and said, I will release the funds

41
00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for this critical infrastructure project if you name Penn Station

42
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dulles Airport after me. Now, Corey, we discussed this

43
00:02:09.159 --> 00:02:12.599
<v Speaker 1>on serious XM already, but traditionally what you do is

44
00:02:12.599 --> 00:02:15.159
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have buildings named after you, you do

45
00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>good things for people, and then later they name buildings

46
00:02:19.159 --> 00:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>after you to honor you for the good things you

47
00:02:21.319 --> 00:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>did for them. This president's doing it differently. He is

48
00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to blackmail people into naming things after him that

49
00:02:27.439 --> 00:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are already named and saying he will hurt them and

50
00:02:30.759 --> 00:02:34.719
<v Speaker 1>not let the projects be built and waste billions if

51
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:37.479
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get what he wants. I mean, is this

52
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a form of extortion that crosses legal lines or is

53
00:02:40.479 --> 00:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>this just really a pathetic, narcissistic version of political brinksmanship.

54
00:02:46.360 --> 00:02:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you know it is narcissism. And this

55
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:51.240
<v Speaker 3>is a person who wants to put his imprint. He

56
00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>put it on buildings in New York City, and now

57
00:02:53.840 --> 00:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>he wants it on a public monument in New York

58
00:02:56.719 --> 00:02:59.439
<v Speaker 3>City or train station. He wants it on airports. He

59
00:02:59.479 --> 00:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>really wants to brand the name Trump. We would put

60
00:03:02.120 --> 00:03:04.319
<v Speaker 3>it on the Lincoln Memorial if we let him. He

61
00:03:04.360 --> 00:03:07.639
<v Speaker 3>wants to put that brand on our entire country and what.

62
00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>That stands for.

63
00:03:08.319 --> 00:03:11.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a symbol, I think, if nothing else, of the

64
00:03:11.120 --> 00:03:16.479
<v Speaker 3>destruction of democracy into a kind of kleptocracy of regime

65
00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of theft, and you know, thankfully he can't be indicted

66
00:03:20.520 --> 00:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>for extortion likely that you know, there's a question anyway

67
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>about whether this is part of his official duty, but

68
00:03:26.560 --> 00:03:28.919
<v Speaker 3>a good chance courts would say it is, and as

69
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>part of his official duty, it's protected. That's the horror

70
00:03:32.319 --> 00:03:34.560
<v Speaker 3>of the immunity case. That's part of why we're talking

71
00:03:34.560 --> 00:03:36.520
<v Speaker 3>all of this. You know, I wish I could say, yeah,

72
00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>in Dietem he committed a crime, but there are other

73
00:03:39.199 --> 00:03:41.719
<v Speaker 3>ways to go at him. And what's happening is that

74
00:03:41.800 --> 00:03:44.240
<v Speaker 3>this project in New York and New Jersey is pushing

75
00:03:44.280 --> 00:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>back saying that this is a breach of contract. You

76
00:03:46.520 --> 00:03:49.639
<v Speaker 3>can't just agree to a plan in which there's expense sharing,

77
00:03:50.120 --> 00:03:52.759
<v Speaker 3>have an entire contractual arrangement, and then up end it

78
00:03:52.800 --> 00:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>with an extortion demand. So I think there is a

79
00:03:55.599 --> 00:03:59.599
<v Speaker 3>realistic possibility, very strong possibility, that if Trump tries to

80
00:03:59.639 --> 00:04:01.439
<v Speaker 3>stop this project, he's not going to get his name

81
00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:04.759
<v Speaker 3>on the building. That's clearly not happening. But I think

82
00:04:04.919 --> 00:04:06.960
<v Speaker 3>he also won't be able to stop the funding. And

83
00:04:07.000 --> 00:04:09.919
<v Speaker 3>so yes, ideally he'd be indicted for something like this

84
00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of things, one of many things, but realistically

85
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:15.360
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen, I think is that courts will

86
00:04:15.400 --> 00:04:18.560
<v Speaker 3>slow him down and stop him from succeeding in this

87
00:04:18.639 --> 00:04:20.600
<v Speaker 3>attempt to brand all of us with his name.

88
00:04:20.959 --> 00:04:25.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, from a constitutional governance grown up standpoint Corey,

89
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:29.079
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous is it when a federal authority is wielded

90
00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in such a seemingly personal and dare I say petulant way?

91
00:04:33.240 --> 00:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean major infrastructure a funded in part with federal

92
00:04:36.839 --> 00:04:41.519
<v Speaker 1>dollars relied upon by millions. It affects the economy when

93
00:04:41.560 --> 00:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that becomes leverage for a personal conflict, not even about policy.

94
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what does that mean for the rule of law?

95
00:04:47.959 --> 00:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there any legal precedent against this kind of tactic?

96
00:04:51.959 --> 00:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

97
00:04:52.399 --> 00:04:55.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would say, just to go back to

98
00:04:55.480 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, like, isn't this extortion that sure looks like

99
00:04:58.040 --> 00:05:01.519
<v Speaker 3>it to me? And isn't that criminal trying to basically

100
00:05:02.199 --> 00:05:05.160
<v Speaker 3>use public money in order to get your demands? I mean,

101
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:09.399
<v Speaker 3>it's mafioso in its characterization. And the thing that's really

102
00:05:09.480 --> 00:05:12.879
<v Speaker 3>unprecedented is the Supreme Court's decision that the President of

103
00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:16.279
<v Speaker 3>the United States has all sorts of immunity. Again, it's

104
00:05:16.319 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>limited that we've talked to Sheldon White House about waste

105
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>through legislation to coordinate off to define official duty very narrowly.

106
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:26.600
<v Speaker 3>But the bottom line is, what's unprecedented is not prosecuting

107
00:05:26.639 --> 00:05:29.879
<v Speaker 3>somebody for extortion, the idea.

108
00:05:29.680 --> 00:05:30.959
<v Speaker 2>That we're all under the law.

109
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:33.759
<v Speaker 3>So now we've got to find other more creative ways

110
00:05:33.759 --> 00:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>of fighting back. And that's the reality of this regime

111
00:05:36.160 --> 00:05:39.839
<v Speaker 3>that we haven't face all unprecedented. A president of the

112
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>United States, this naked and this aggression. We've seen other

113
00:05:43.240 --> 00:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>presidents act out in different ways, but this kind of

114
00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>raw extortion. We saw it from a vice president, that

115
00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:52.319
<v Speaker 3>kind of corruption spureau agnum, But from a president in

116
00:05:52.360 --> 00:05:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the open doing this, I think that really is different

117
00:05:55.600 --> 00:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>from what we've seen before.

118
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.079
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn it now to another report that

119
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ executed a search of a Washington Post reporter's home,

120
00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>professor and filed a bar complaint related to coverage. Alarm

121
00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>bells have been going off in all the hot First

122
00:06:11.839 --> 00:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Amendment circles on this. Jeff Bezos, of course, has had

123
00:06:15.519 --> 00:06:18.879
<v Speaker 1>no comment about a reporter's home being searched, and this

124
00:06:18.959 --> 00:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is a reporter who people leak to. How do you

125
00:06:22.199 --> 00:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>view this in light of constitutional protections for the press.

126
00:06:26.160 --> 00:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like this is done to intimidate other journalists

127
00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more than to punish one.

128
00:06:30.959 --> 00:06:33.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think our first story, John is important symbolically.

129
00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:36.199
<v Speaker 3>It's about a president trying to put his name on

130
00:06:36.759 --> 00:06:40.399
<v Speaker 3>our building and to destroy democracy in a sort of

131
00:06:40.399 --> 00:06:43.120
<v Speaker 3>symbolic way. But when I think about this story, if

132
00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I had to pick one thing that defines whether or

133
00:06:45.199 --> 00:06:47.519
<v Speaker 3>not we're in a dictatorship or a democracy, it's whether

134
00:06:47.600 --> 00:06:52.439
<v Speaker 3>or not the dictator can imprison those and investigate those

135
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>who are doing.

136
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Things that displeases him. And you know, you like to

137
00:06:57.160 --> 00:06:57.519
<v Speaker 2>think that.

138
00:06:57.519 --> 00:06:59.639
<v Speaker 3>In America, of course, we have a First Amendment, not

139
00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:02.639
<v Speaker 3>just a guarantee of the freedom of press, but a

140
00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>guarantee of free speech more generally. And you know, in

141
00:07:06.199 --> 00:07:09.199
<v Speaker 3>the hot First Amendment circles, which I include the Supreme

142
00:07:09.199 --> 00:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Court in that circle, and all those of us who

143
00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>care about the rule of law, not Donald Trump and

144
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>his cronies, that's not even a hard thing to talk about.

145
00:07:18.560 --> 00:07:21.279
<v Speaker 3>And we don't just have, thankfully, the First Amendment. There

146
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>is legislation protecting journalists from being prosecuted for their work.

147
00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And yet all of that, all of those laws, it's

148
00:07:30.120 --> 00:07:32.079
<v Speaker 3>not just norms. We're going to talk later about the

149
00:07:32.160 --> 00:07:37.199
<v Speaker 3>DJ and norms. These aren't norms. There's legislation, there's the constitution.

150
00:07:38.000 --> 00:07:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Are just being blown through, and they're trying to essentially investigate,

151
00:07:42.199 --> 00:07:45.519
<v Speaker 3>maybe charge journalists for doing their job under the grounds

152
00:07:45.560 --> 00:07:48.079
<v Speaker 3>that they're committing espionage. Just to get into it. This

153
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>is about an investigation into the kind of pressure on Meiduro,

154
00:07:51.120 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 3>what was happening in Venezuela. This isn't sideline stuff. It's

155
00:07:55.079 --> 00:07:59.519
<v Speaker 3>the heartbeat of the questions facing us right now as

156
00:07:59.560 --> 00:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>a democrat. And if you can't have investigations here, then

157
00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:05.279
<v Speaker 3>in what way do we have a democracy? It's why

158
00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:09.439
<v Speaker 3>the collapse into dictatorship. Are we collapsing? Have we collapsed?

159
00:08:09.480 --> 00:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>That is a very real question right now, and this

160
00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:14.879
<v Speaker 3>example is one of the best for showing that.

161
00:08:15.279 --> 00:08:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you just explain what are the legal

162
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:21.839
<v Speaker 1>limits that the DOJ is supposed to observe before they

163
00:08:21.959 --> 00:08:25.399
<v Speaker 1>target a journalist or their communications. I mean, is there

164
00:08:25.439 --> 00:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>some kind of constitutional threshold here that has to be

165
00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:32.159
<v Speaker 1>met to justify going into this lady's house and taking

166
00:08:32.200 --> 00:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>her laptops and phone.

167
00:08:34.440 --> 00:08:37.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, there is a clear answer about that.

168
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>When the preperraras of the World when he was US

169
00:08:40.919 --> 00:08:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Attorney for the Southern District of New York, when he

170
00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>was working at the Department of Justice.

171
00:08:44.840 --> 00:08:47.200
<v Speaker 2>We've had Glenn Kirshner on the show now twice.

172
00:08:47.240 --> 00:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>When he was at the Department of Justice, there was

173
00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:52.080
<v Speaker 3>a rule that had to be followed internally, which was

174
00:08:52.159 --> 00:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>essentially was, don't prosecute journalists for doing their job. If

175
00:08:55.759 --> 00:08:59.080
<v Speaker 3>a journalist kills somebody or commits murder, fine, but not

176
00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:02.679
<v Speaker 3>for journalists. And you can guess what's happened to that

177
00:09:02.840 --> 00:09:07.879
<v Speaker 3>rule under the Trump administration. Pambondi has not just gotten

178
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:08.879
<v Speaker 3>rid of it, but just.

179
00:09:08.879 --> 00:09:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Blown past it.

180
00:09:10.360 --> 00:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>And you know, there are laws about espionage, for instance,

181
00:09:14.159 --> 00:09:17.759
<v Speaker 3>that traditionally just don't apply to journalists, and there's legislation

182
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:21.080
<v Speaker 3>to protect against that. But when you're Pambondi and you're

183
00:09:21.080 --> 00:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>doing the bidding of a president of trying to shut

184
00:09:23.120 --> 00:09:25.799
<v Speaker 3>down democracy by shutting down descent and shutting it down

185
00:09:25.840 --> 00:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the information flow that the press needs to give us

186
00:09:28.879 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 3>to make decisions as citizens, again that's as important as voting.

187
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:36.039
<v Speaker 3>The lines are blown past and all of these norms

188
00:09:36.039 --> 00:09:39.240
<v Speaker 3>that protected us, all this law that protected us, seem

189
00:09:39.320 --> 00:09:42.360
<v Speaker 3>to be a minimum eroding now it's not over. I

190
00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>think that the judiciary here, it's such a line that's been.

191
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Crossed, they'll push back.

192
00:09:47.159 --> 00:09:49.159
<v Speaker 3>But there is a chilling effect and that's part of

193
00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:52.039
<v Speaker 3>the danger here, that the press is being shut down

194
00:09:52.320 --> 00:09:55.320
<v Speaker 3>by the president, even if he doesn't succeed in a

195
00:09:55.399 --> 00:10:00.120
<v Speaker 3>prosecution imprisoning this journalist, there's fear and that's.

196
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like this is directly connected in a way

197
00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Gateway tunnel story with infrastructure.

198
00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>It's all about intimidation.

199
00:10:06.440 --> 00:10:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's all about this government trying to use fear

200
00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to get its own way.

201
00:10:10.840 --> 00:10:12.240
<v Speaker 4>It's not really about policy.

202
00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are people who are defending this search

203
00:10:14.639 --> 00:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of a reporter's home saying that, you know, it's law

204
00:10:17.440 --> 00:10:22.279
<v Speaker 1>enforcement acting within their boundaries. But what happens when a

205
00:10:22.480 --> 00:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>DOJ does things that have the effect of chilling reporting,

206
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>especially on matters of public interest. It seems like, again,

207
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:31.639
<v Speaker 1>this is why they went after Don Lemon and those

208
00:10:31.639 --> 00:10:34.639
<v Speaker 1>four journalists and for covering the protest and the Saint

209
00:10:34.639 --> 00:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Paul church. They know Don Lemon and the black journalists

210
00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't break the law. They're trying to scare other journalists.

211
00:10:40.799 --> 00:10:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and John, I think that's such an important point

212
00:10:42.960 --> 00:10:45.080
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of times. And I think when you

213
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>and I started talking about all this in twenty sixteen,

214
00:10:48.440 --> 00:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>when Trump was running, when even early in his first term,

215
00:10:51.840 --> 00:10:54.759
<v Speaker 3>and you know, Preperr is an example of this, you know,

216
00:10:54.879 --> 00:10:59.639
<v Speaker 3>fighting back, refusing to resign, getting fired. The norms were

217
00:10:59.639 --> 00:11:01.759
<v Speaker 3>so wrong that we thought he's not going to succeed.

218
00:11:02.440 --> 00:11:04.360
<v Speaker 3>And now we're in a different world, which is that

219
00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:06.519
<v Speaker 3>the question isn't whether or not people are going to prison,

220
00:11:06.639 --> 00:11:09.480
<v Speaker 3>whether or not these prosecutions are successful. It's whether or

221
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:12.480
<v Speaker 3>not he can intimidate us into being quiet. And now

222
00:11:12.519 --> 00:11:15.159
<v Speaker 3>you and I are talking every week. I don't anticipate

223
00:11:15.279 --> 00:11:17.919
<v Speaker 3>us stopping that. There are lots of others speaking out,

224
00:11:17.960 --> 00:11:19.679
<v Speaker 3>but there are a lot of journalists, I think, who

225
00:11:19.720 --> 00:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>are being targeted who must think to themselves, I'm not

226
00:11:22.519 --> 00:11:24.919
<v Speaker 3>sure I wouldn't go through with this. Now it's a

227
00:11:24.960 --> 00:11:28.440
<v Speaker 3>different story. But if you add in Jeff Bezos's evisceration

228
00:11:28.559 --> 00:11:30.519
<v Speaker 3>of the Washington Post and how hard it is to

229
00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>keep your job in journalism, you know it might succeed

230
00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:35.919
<v Speaker 3>in having that chilling effect and that idea of the

231
00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>chilling effect, and just to say what that means, it means,

232
00:11:39.039 --> 00:11:41.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, apart from the hard power of putting people

233
00:11:41.799 --> 00:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>in prison, scaring people into thinking they might be investigated

234
00:11:45.279 --> 00:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>or prosecuted. That's equally detrimental to the First Amendment.

235
00:11:48.600 --> 00:11:49.039
<v Speaker 2>We've got.

236
00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:51.759
<v Speaker 3>It's not just a chilling effect, it's a storm, an

237
00:11:51.759 --> 00:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>ice storm of the chilling effect of free speech.

238
00:11:54.360 --> 00:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>To shut down of free speech, we.

239
00:11:56.080 --> 00:11:57.039
<v Speaker 4>Got to take a quick break.

240
00:11:57.080 --> 00:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But when we come back, the least didictable members of

241
00:12:01.159 --> 00:12:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the resistance to stare down subpoenas by Congress, Bill and

242
00:12:05.039 --> 00:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton in twenty twenty six will be back in

243
00:12:07.840 --> 00:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a moment.

244
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:11.919
<v Speaker 4>This is the oath and the Office.

245
00:12:14.399 --> 00:12:16.799
<v Speaker 5>Here's what you've been missing on the Stephanie Miller Happy

246
00:12:16.840 --> 00:12:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Hour podcast.

247
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the putin. I'm not saying that's ruy.

248
00:12:21.919 --> 00:12:24.440
<v Speaker 6>Lie, not gonna put.

249
00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:24.919
<v Speaker 7>It Obama ape video.

250
00:12:25.039 --> 00:12:28.559
<v Speaker 5>He's like, you know, the sixteen different explanations, right, like

251
00:12:28.639 --> 00:12:30.639
<v Speaker 5>I was a staffer. Oh no, I told the stafford

252
00:12:30.679 --> 00:12:32.600
<v Speaker 5>to do it. No, I'm not gonna apologize. I mean,

253
00:12:32.639 --> 00:12:34.159
<v Speaker 5>you know how I'm gonna take it down now, I'm

254
00:12:34.159 --> 00:12:37.559
<v Speaker 5>not gonna take it. I mean, it's just it's insane, right,

255
00:12:37.600 --> 00:12:41.240
<v Speaker 5>and everyone knows there's no staffer that posted from your

256
00:12:41.240 --> 00:12:43.080
<v Speaker 5>personal account in the middle of the Night Right.

257
00:12:43.399 --> 00:12:47.399
<v Speaker 6>It's just such a whiner, just again, whining point USA

258
00:12:48.240 --> 00:12:52.279
<v Speaker 6>all they do and again it's Putin's just lie. Hold on,

259
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:55.159
<v Speaker 6>I'm calling Putin for advice like keep them lying, just

260
00:12:55.240 --> 00:12:55.840
<v Speaker 6>keep lying.

261
00:12:56.159 --> 00:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Why do you call in the book?

262
00:12:57.440 --> 00:13:00.799
<v Speaker 7>I kill you lie lie light booth, go me again.

263
00:13:00.879 --> 00:13:01.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm blocking you.

264
00:13:02.120 --> 00:13:05.879
<v Speaker 5>Subscribe to the Stephanie Miller Happy Hour podcast on Apple Podcasts,

265
00:13:05.879 --> 00:13:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Stephanie Miller dot com, or wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

266
00:13:17.840 --> 00:13:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Oath and the Office. I'm John

267
00:13:20.559 --> 00:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Peeble saying, along with Professor Reretschneider Corey, I want to

268
00:13:23.639 --> 00:13:26.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about the Clinton subpoena dynamics we've witnessed

269
00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:30.399
<v Speaker 1>this week. This has been a really fascinating story and wow,

270
00:13:30.440 --> 00:13:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long time since I found myself standing

271
00:13:32.679 --> 00:13:34.159
<v Speaker 1>up and rooting for both of the Clinton's at the

272
00:13:34.159 --> 00:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>same time. But we've seen these reports that Hillary Clinton

273
00:13:37.639 --> 00:13:40.879
<v Speaker 1>is pushing for a public hearing ahead of this deposition

274
00:13:40.960 --> 00:13:44.159
<v Speaker 1>related to the Epstein files. Bill Clinton did quite a

275
00:13:44.200 --> 00:13:46.759
<v Speaker 1>hell of a Twitter threat about how he will not

276
00:13:46.879 --> 00:13:49.919
<v Speaker 1>be a prop for these people. And there's a broader

277
00:13:49.960 --> 00:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fight going on here over congressional oversight tools. They seem

278
00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to have really embarrassed James Comer, and a lot of

279
00:13:55.279 --> 00:13:58.399
<v Speaker 1>people are wondering what, why are they doing this? I mean,

280
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:03.279
<v Speaker 1>no presidents testified before Congress since Gerald Ford, like forty

281
00:14:03.360 --> 00:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago. How would you assess the legal and constitutional

282
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:10.639
<v Speaker 1>contours of this battle with the acknowledgment that this is

283
00:14:10.720 --> 00:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>all a distraction from the fact that Trump and panbody

284
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:17.039
<v Speaker 1>have been protecting child rape illegally breaking the law every

285
00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:18.279
<v Speaker 1>day since December nineteenth.

286
00:14:18.679 --> 00:14:21.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's the most important place to begin, Like,

287
00:14:21.039 --> 00:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>why were we even talking about this. It's because Trump

288
00:14:23.399 --> 00:14:26.519
<v Speaker 3>is trying to cast off any guilt and implication that

289
00:14:26.559 --> 00:14:29.200
<v Speaker 3>he might have in the Epstein evils. I think we

290
00:14:29.200 --> 00:14:30.799
<v Speaker 3>can call it based on what we know at this

291
00:14:30.919 --> 00:14:33.720
<v Speaker 3>point and put it on one of his opponents. Again,

292
00:14:33.799 --> 00:14:38.320
<v Speaker 3>that's the common theme, Hillary Clinton and also increasingly Bill Clinton. Now,

293
00:14:38.639 --> 00:14:40.679
<v Speaker 3>they would be well within their rights and I think

294
00:14:40.679 --> 00:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>they would win to simply fight and court the subpoena,

295
00:14:43.559 --> 00:14:46.919
<v Speaker 3>because there are rules and principles of law that govern

296
00:14:47.120 --> 00:14:50.600
<v Speaker 3>when Congress can force people to testify and when it can,

297
00:14:50.840 --> 00:14:53.399
<v Speaker 3>and that is what a subpoena is. It's compelled testimony,

298
00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:57.200
<v Speaker 3>and the question is whether or not there's some legislative

299
00:14:57.240 --> 00:15:01.080
<v Speaker 3>purpose here. Now, if Congress was considering, you know, legislation

300
00:15:01.279 --> 00:15:04.919
<v Speaker 3>to correct the evil of Epstein, to look into the

301
00:15:04.960 --> 00:15:08.000
<v Speaker 3>wrongdoing of these networks and to break them up, then

302
00:15:08.480 --> 00:15:10.639
<v Speaker 3>I think, okay, there's a legislative purpose.

303
00:15:10.639 --> 00:15:12.639
<v Speaker 2>But what's the purpose here? If the purpose is.

304
00:15:12.559 --> 00:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>To deflect from the guilt and attention on the President

305
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:19.159
<v Speaker 3>of the United States and Pam Bondi and covering up

306
00:15:19.399 --> 00:15:22.360
<v Speaker 3>again evil, that's not a legitimate purpose.

307
00:15:22.440 --> 00:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So they could fight back. So why are they not?

308
00:15:24.559 --> 00:15:26.679
<v Speaker 3>I think because they know they could win in court,

309
00:15:26.720 --> 00:15:29.559
<v Speaker 3>and I think again they would, but they seem to

310
00:15:29.600 --> 00:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>be and I'm willing to praise them for this, demanding

311
00:15:32.279 --> 00:15:35.240
<v Speaker 3>more and more transparency. Want transparency, will give it to you.

312
00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:38.360
<v Speaker 3>And Bill Clinton is indicating that he knows something that's

313
00:15:38.360 --> 00:15:41.360
<v Speaker 3>going to educate America about all right. You know, I

314
00:15:41.360 --> 00:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>think he could just tell us. That would be one

315
00:15:44.159 --> 00:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>way to do it. Ready to do it in this

316
00:15:46.039 --> 00:15:49.039
<v Speaker 3>dramatic fashion by facing off against House Republicans.

317
00:15:49.080 --> 00:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>More power to them, let's see it.

318
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I was at the DNC two summers ago, and of

319
00:15:53.039 --> 00:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>course Bill Clinton was the guy who went off script

320
00:15:55.519 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for twenty minutes, just went off the telepropter. He does

321
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>know how to high jack something, and we forget what

322
00:16:01.440 --> 00:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly compelling orator he is. But yeah, I mean,

323
00:16:05.519 --> 00:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the smartest pr I have seen Bill Clinton

324
00:16:08.399 --> 00:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>do in many many years, that that he urgently wants

325
00:16:11.879 --> 00:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to come out and do it. Now, You're right, he

326
00:16:13.600 --> 00:16:16.399
<v Speaker 1>could just get himself booked on any TV show. Hey, Bill,

327
00:16:16.519 --> 00:16:19.039
<v Speaker 1>serious exp progress. I'm here baby, waiting for you.

328
00:16:19.559 --> 00:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>How about the in the Office pot in the Office podcast? Bill?

329
00:16:22.799 --> 00:16:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I mean, I live near Harlem. We're all

330
00:16:24.840 --> 00:16:28.759
<v Speaker 1>practically neighbors. But oversight via subpoena power is supposed to

331
00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:31.759
<v Speaker 1>be whe of Congress's core constitutional authorities. I've learned that

332
00:16:31.799 --> 00:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from you, and we learned that when the Republicans just

333
00:16:34.559 --> 00:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>loved ignoring their subpoenas because they don't have to. But

334
00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the balance of power when subpoenas are

335
00:16:40.399 --> 00:16:42.919
<v Speaker 1>ignored or or contested at the executive level.

336
00:16:43.320 --> 00:16:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's a balance.

337
00:16:44.600 --> 00:16:48.519
<v Speaker 3>You know, during the compulsion to testify of people in

338
00:16:48.559 --> 00:16:51.879
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration the aftermath, I thought that, you know,

339
00:16:51.919 --> 00:16:55.919
<v Speaker 3>there was a serious legislative purpose to compelling some of

340
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:58.639
<v Speaker 3>this testimony. Of course, Bannon refused to testify in and

341
00:16:58.720 --> 00:17:01.720
<v Speaker 3>went to prison for it. But you know, I think

342
00:17:01.759 --> 00:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the balances we have to remember there are moments in

343
00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:07.480
<v Speaker 3>history where Congress has abused its investigative power. So it's

344
00:17:07.519 --> 00:17:10.519
<v Speaker 3>not as simple as if you're brought to testify, then yes,

345
00:17:10.559 --> 00:17:12.559
<v Speaker 3>you should have to do it. So I think of

346
00:17:12.599 --> 00:17:15.079
<v Speaker 3>the red Scare of the House on American Affairs Committee,

347
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>for instance, which is all about attacking those on the left,

348
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:22.960
<v Speaker 3>communists but also progressives and people who were to the

349
00:17:23.039 --> 00:17:27.839
<v Speaker 3>left of center. And were those subpoenas legitimate, No, absolutely

350
00:17:27.880 --> 00:17:30.319
<v Speaker 3>they were not, and so they were an attempt to

351
00:17:30.400 --> 00:17:33.559
<v Speaker 3>use the tools of government in order to shut down opinion.

352
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:38.279
<v Speaker 3>And I think here too, it's more complicated. It's not

353
00:17:38.359 --> 00:17:41.039
<v Speaker 3>just that it's an attempt to deflect from the responsibility

354
00:17:41.039 --> 00:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>of the President of Trump and it's not a legitimate purpose.

355
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:47.319
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think they would be within their legal

356
00:17:47.400 --> 00:17:48.160
<v Speaker 3>right to fight back.

357
00:17:48.200 --> 00:17:51.880
<v Speaker 2>But again, you know, they're savvy politicians. They can defend themselves.

358
00:17:51.960 --> 00:17:54.759
<v Speaker 3>They're not in a position where they're going to look

359
00:17:54.799 --> 00:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>bad in front of this committee. And my bet is

360
00:17:57.039 --> 00:17:59.519
<v Speaker 3>on them that they are going to bring out some

361
00:17:59.519 --> 00:18:01.839
<v Speaker 3>truths that we haven't seen before, and in the process

362
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:03.759
<v Speaker 3>humiliate their political opponents.

363
00:18:03.960 --> 00:18:06.279
<v Speaker 4>I think you're right, and oh, I'm buying popcorn.

364
00:18:06.599 --> 00:18:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I think for that very reason, we'll see James Comer

365
00:18:08.839 --> 00:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>demure from this when he realizes that humiliating the Clintons

366
00:18:13.160 --> 00:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>won't get him some table scraps from mister Trump.

367
00:18:15.799 --> 00:18:17.279
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask about this, this.

368
00:18:17.319 --> 00:18:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Article you sent me in the New York Times that

369
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:23.559
<v Speaker 1>blows my mind about the DOJ trying to recruit prosecutors.

370
00:18:23.720 --> 00:18:26.759
<v Speaker 1>The reports say that they're recruiting prosecutors with a strong

371
00:18:26.880 --> 00:18:30.279
<v Speaker 1>view of federal enforcement. What does that mean? Well, in

372
00:18:30.319 --> 00:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this case, it seems to mean that they align with

373
00:18:32.279 --> 00:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the political priorities of this current lawbreaking administration. In other words,

374
00:18:37.839 --> 00:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they're having a hard time hiring prosecutors to do their

375
00:18:40.680 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>dirty work for them. This is fascinating from a constitutional perspective.

376
00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:48.279
<v Speaker 1>From an institutional perspective, I mean, what are the risk

377
00:18:48.359 --> 00:18:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of recruitment strategies like this. We don't want you to

378
00:18:51.920 --> 00:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be loyal to the law. We want you to be

379
00:18:53.720 --> 00:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>loyal to the game show host running the government.

380
00:18:57.000 --> 00:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just think what a topic and what a

381
00:18:59.079 --> 00:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>lead in This is the in depth interview that pre Perrara.

382
00:19:02.319 --> 00:19:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to certainly ask him about this and talk

383
00:19:04.279 --> 00:19:06.400
<v Speaker 3>to him about it, but as an initial way in,

384
00:19:07.000 --> 00:19:08.839
<v Speaker 3>let me just say this. You know, the Department of

385
00:19:09.000 --> 00:19:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Justice used to be a highly prestigious position. One of

386
00:19:12.359 --> 00:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the most impressive things that you could do out of

387
00:19:15.279 --> 00:19:17.599
<v Speaker 3>law school or really any point in your law career

388
00:19:17.640 --> 00:19:19.319
<v Speaker 3>would be to go and to work in one of

389
00:19:19.359 --> 00:19:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the divisions of the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice,

390
00:19:22.960 --> 00:19:27.359
<v Speaker 3>by the way, founded during the Grant administration to protect

391
00:19:27.480 --> 00:19:30.480
<v Speaker 3>civil rights, to enforce the Ku Klux Klan Act and

392
00:19:30.559 --> 00:19:33.640
<v Speaker 3>shut down the white supremacy that was left in this

393
00:19:33.720 --> 00:19:36.039
<v Speaker 3>country in the aftermath of the Civil War.

394
00:19:36.200 --> 00:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>What a proud history.

395
00:19:37.960 --> 00:19:40.519
<v Speaker 3>And I think for so much of its history, the

396
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Department of Justice did amazing work, even during the Nixon administration.

397
00:19:45.160 --> 00:19:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Archibald Cox who went after the President for his crimes,

398
00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:53.119
<v Speaker 3>exposing him, working with the Grand Jury that uncovered so

399
00:19:53.240 --> 00:19:55.799
<v Speaker 3>much of the crimes of Watergate, later handing it all

400
00:19:55.839 --> 00:19:59.319
<v Speaker 3>over to Congress and a failure to indict the president. Yes,

401
00:19:59.400 --> 00:20:03.559
<v Speaker 3>but still a proud moment. Leon Jaworski who continued that

402
00:20:03.599 --> 00:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>fight the aftermath of Nixon.

403
00:20:05.759 --> 00:20:08.119
<v Speaker 2>All of this, what I'm summarizing.

404
00:20:07.599 --> 00:20:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Is this is a prestigious proud part of our government

405
00:20:11.799 --> 00:20:14.400
<v Speaker 3>for so long, and now it is the opposite. It

406
00:20:14.519 --> 00:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>is the tool, the weapon of this president. And guess what,

407
00:20:18.400 --> 00:20:20.559
<v Speaker 3>people don't want to go work there. So what does

408
00:20:20.599 --> 00:20:23.319
<v Speaker 3>that mean. It means really the hollowing out of this

409
00:20:23.480 --> 00:20:27.519
<v Speaker 3>institution and the use of it to go after political opponents.

410
00:20:27.559 --> 00:20:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Here's one silver lining that I'm going to ask pretty about.

411
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe their incompetence helps at least in some of these cases,

412
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:36.519
<v Speaker 3>because you know, with better lawyers, maybe they would succeed

413
00:20:36.559 --> 00:20:38.559
<v Speaker 3>in going after some of their opponents.

414
00:20:38.880 --> 00:20:39.240
<v Speaker 7>Exactly.

415
00:20:39.319 --> 00:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're right, and that is why we know

416
00:20:42.480 --> 00:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're kind of doomed to failure. This whole thing

417
00:20:44.759 --> 00:20:50.519
<v Speaker 1>of deliberately hiring unqualified flunkies. I mean, Pete, hegseeth cash,

418
00:20:50.519 --> 00:20:54.039
<v Speaker 1>but tell cash, but tell like he's hiring these people

419
00:20:54.079 --> 00:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're not going to say no, mister President, that's illegal.

420
00:20:57.440 --> 00:21:02.319
<v Speaker 1>He's hiring them because they're obediently unkies who are easily disposable.

421
00:21:02.559 --> 00:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And if, say in the case of Christy Nome, things

422
00:21:04.799 --> 00:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ever get too hot or unpleasant for Trump, you just

423
00:21:07.359 --> 00:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>land them like a boil and they take all the blame.

424
00:21:09.599 --> 00:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>The flunkies don't seem to realize, professor, that this Supreme

425
00:21:13.000 --> 00:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Court immunity doesn't apply to them. But beyond that, it

426
00:21:17.079 --> 00:21:20.279
<v Speaker 1>just seems like this is going to wreck this whole

427
00:21:20.319 --> 00:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>partisanship in recruiting prosecutors. This is going to destroy public

428
00:21:25.000 --> 00:21:28.319
<v Speaker 1>trust in America's Department of Justice as a neutral law

429
00:21:28.400 --> 00:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>enforcement body. I mean, at some point, perception is going

430
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a serious problem for the rule of law

431
00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:35.559
<v Speaker 1>in this country when everyone knows you can't take the

432
00:21:35.640 --> 00:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>rule of law seriously.

433
00:21:37.319 --> 00:21:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as they destroy they I mean, Trump and his

434
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:43.599
<v Speaker 3>cronies destroy our institutions, including the Department of Justice, and

435
00:21:44.039 --> 00:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>they are pretty close to having destroyed it. It's not

436
00:21:46.920 --> 00:21:48.799
<v Speaker 3>going to be so easy that if we defeat them

437
00:21:48.839 --> 00:21:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to just put it back. We really are going to

438
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:52.839
<v Speaker 3>have to rebuild these institutions one by one, and that

439
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:56.599
<v Speaker 3>includes the Department of Justice. I love your reference to

440
00:21:56.640 --> 00:21:59.920
<v Speaker 3>our slogan from last week, which is that Trump has immunity,

441
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:03.119
<v Speaker 3>you don't. I had a lot of comments from listeners

442
00:22:03.359 --> 00:22:05.519
<v Speaker 3>who love that, and we should make t shirts at

443
00:22:05.519 --> 00:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>some point. But that's part of the reminder, you know,

444
00:22:08.119 --> 00:22:09.799
<v Speaker 3>and not just that you might be charged with a

445
00:22:09.799 --> 00:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>crime if you're Pambondi. And it looks like some of

446
00:22:12.279 --> 00:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>what she did is not just unethical but possibly criminal

447
00:22:15.880 --> 00:22:18.799
<v Speaker 3>or Pete Hagseth. But you know, for lawyers there's a

448
00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:21.400
<v Speaker 3>question of disbarment. And so that's one thing that I'll

449
00:22:21.400 --> 00:22:24.160
<v Speaker 3>continue in the conversation with Preed that you know, you

450
00:22:24.240 --> 00:22:26.240
<v Speaker 3>might get away with it now, but eventually we're going

451
00:22:26.319 --> 00:22:29.279
<v Speaker 3>to find out and you might lose your license. And

452
00:22:29.319 --> 00:22:31.440
<v Speaker 3>if you value being a lawyer or a short term

453
00:22:31.519 --> 00:22:33.599
<v Speaker 3>moment in the Department of Justice, it might not be

454
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:35.920
<v Speaker 3>worth it for you. But that's not how these people

455
00:22:35.960 --> 00:22:37.200
<v Speaker 3>are calculating it often.

456
00:22:37.359 --> 00:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>But when you consider how they chase down the honest,

457
00:22:40.160 --> 00:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>hard working prosecutors who went after the terrorists who attacked

458
00:22:43.400 --> 00:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our government and our election on January sixth, I mean,

459
00:22:46.480 --> 00:22:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it would be punitive for the Democrats.

460
00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:49.279
<v Speaker 4>To have a purge.

461
00:22:49.279 --> 00:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Of the purge, a lot of people are going to

462
00:22:51.200 --> 00:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>get invited to have their jobs back when the Nuremberg

463
00:22:54.440 --> 00:22:56.799
<v Speaker 1>trials were all praying for finally happened. But I mean,

464
00:22:56.839 --> 00:23:01.519
<v Speaker 1>are there any structural safeguards Corey and the DOJ in

465
00:23:01.599 --> 00:23:06.319
<v Speaker 1>just basic norms that protect against partisan staffing decisions, or

466
00:23:06.440 --> 00:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are those safeguards eroded and they can just hire twenty

467
00:23:08.920 --> 00:23:10.319
<v Speaker 1>five cash hotels if they want.

468
00:23:11.160 --> 00:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, there was a lot of discussion, especially after Nixon,

469
00:23:14.200 --> 00:23:16.759
<v Speaker 3>about the need for norms, and I think there were

470
00:23:17.039 --> 00:23:19.279
<v Speaker 3>norms of independence, and we'll talk about that in the

471
00:23:19.319 --> 00:23:22.559
<v Speaker 3>interview with pre Ways, in which they're really the president

472
00:23:22.680 --> 00:23:26.319
<v Speaker 3>wasn't even allowed to call somebody to talk to prosecutors

473
00:23:26.319 --> 00:23:29.680
<v Speaker 3>on the phone, that that was seen as so outrageous

474
00:23:29.720 --> 00:23:32.599
<v Speaker 3>that it was itself a norm violation. Forget about what

475
00:23:32.680 --> 00:23:35.519
<v Speaker 3>was said, even to talk to each other. And that

476
00:23:35.680 --> 00:23:38.880
<v Speaker 3>shows you it's a symbol of this kind of independence.

477
00:23:39.160 --> 00:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>The Department of Justice is not supposed to be the

478
00:23:40.960 --> 00:23:44.200
<v Speaker 3>president's lawyer. They're supposed to be the people's lawyers defending

479
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>our laws. And how badly have those norms eroded. My takeaway,

480
00:23:49.839 --> 00:23:52.039
<v Speaker 3>and we've talked about this before, but I don't think

481
00:23:52.079 --> 00:23:54.279
<v Speaker 3>we could talk about it enough, is that it's not

482
00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:56.200
<v Speaker 3>enough to have norms. When we think about how to

483
00:23:56.240 --> 00:23:59.200
<v Speaker 3>recover this Department of Justice, that we have to create

484
00:23:59.640 --> 00:24:03.160
<v Speaker 3>another independent prosecutor who can't be fired by a president,

485
00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:05.400
<v Speaker 3>who can look into the wrongdoing of a president.

486
00:24:05.480 --> 00:24:07.559
<v Speaker 2>And yes, through legislation, if.

487
00:24:07.440 --> 00:24:09.119
<v Speaker 3>We were to bring this back, we would need a

488
00:24:09.160 --> 00:24:11.559
<v Speaker 3>new law to do this. It was in existence the

489
00:24:11.559 --> 00:24:15.279
<v Speaker 3>independent prosecutor between Carter and Clinton. Clinton got rid of

490
00:24:15.279 --> 00:24:17.920
<v Speaker 3>it because he didn't like being investigated by Ken Starr.

491
00:24:18.200 --> 00:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>If we bring it back, we should give protection from.

492
00:24:21.319 --> 00:24:25.079
<v Speaker 3>Firing to allow that independence of investigation of even the president.

493
00:24:25.400 --> 00:24:26.279
<v Speaker 2>And we should give and.

494
00:24:26.240 --> 00:24:28.440
<v Speaker 3>This relates to what we were talking about before, the

495
00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:31.559
<v Speaker 3>ability to even indict a sitting president, and that means

496
00:24:32.039 --> 00:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>narrowing community case.

497
00:24:34.279 --> 00:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but you say, you know, if we get it back,

498
00:24:36.400 --> 00:24:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what would it take to restore it? The

499
00:24:39.880 --> 00:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department's independence has been compromised. I mean what would

500
00:24:44.240 --> 00:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it take to restore it with a president who's not

501
00:24:46.839 --> 00:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>capable of wanting that? You know, like day one, you'd

502
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have someone who followed the Epstein Files law

503
00:24:52.759 --> 00:24:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that was signed in December.

504
00:24:53.960 --> 00:24:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, recoveries take time. It's not going to

505
00:24:56.240 --> 00:24:58.480
<v Speaker 3>happen now. It's not going to happen before the mid terms.

506
00:24:59.039 --> 00:25:02.200
<v Speaker 3>It might happen, you know, in a new Congress that's

507
00:25:02.319 --> 00:25:06.400
<v Speaker 3>controlled by not the Republican Party but by Democrats. And

508
00:25:06.920 --> 00:25:09.279
<v Speaker 3>just to say how it would happen, you know, the

509
00:25:09.279 --> 00:25:13.039
<v Speaker 3>Department of Justice is structured by legislation, and right now

510
00:25:13.079 --> 00:25:15.759
<v Speaker 3>there's not a lot of protection of the supposed norm

511
00:25:15.799 --> 00:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of independence, and the norm is gone.

512
00:25:18.079 --> 00:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>But you could rewrite the law.

513
00:25:19.599 --> 00:25:22.200
<v Speaker 3>You could rewrite it so that there is independence of

514
00:25:22.200 --> 00:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Justice itself, of especially independent prosecutors.

515
00:25:26.440 --> 00:25:28.119
<v Speaker 2>That idea that did exist in.

516
00:25:28.079 --> 00:25:31.160
<v Speaker 3>This country was an idea after Watergate that we should

517
00:25:31.160 --> 00:25:33.440
<v Speaker 3>bring back, and we've got to be creative about that.

518
00:25:33.519 --> 00:25:34.559
<v Speaker 2>But that's part of the hope.

519
00:25:34.559 --> 00:25:36.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, on this podcast, we're always talking about the destruction,

520
00:25:37.400 --> 00:25:39.839
<v Speaker 3>but there's a way to respond to fix the problem

521
00:25:39.920 --> 00:25:42.200
<v Speaker 3>through legislation, and that's what we're talking about.

522
00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I think will happen eventually. It will

523
00:25:44.359 --> 00:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>take time.

524
00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:46.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not going to happen, you know, in the next

525
00:25:46.640 --> 00:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>few months, certainly, will it happen in the next Congress.

526
00:25:49.799 --> 00:25:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Possibly. I think that's what we've got to get on

527
00:25:51.720 --> 00:25:53.039
<v Speaker 2>the agenda. Part of what we're.

528
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:56.039
<v Speaker 3>Doing is talking to people, educating them about what's happening,

529
00:25:56.039 --> 00:25:58.759
<v Speaker 3>but we're also trying to set an agenda for recovery.

530
00:25:58.799 --> 00:26:01.160
<v Speaker 3>And when we talk to Senator white House, for instance,

531
00:26:01.480 --> 00:26:03.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, we were able to talk to him about

532
00:26:03.480 --> 00:26:05.799
<v Speaker 3>the specifics of what this might look like, not just

533
00:26:05.839 --> 00:26:08.039
<v Speaker 3>ask him questions and we'll continue to do that.

534
00:26:08.440 --> 00:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We have to take a quick break, but when we

535
00:26:10.519 --> 00:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>come back, it is happening. It is on Corey Bretschneider

536
00:26:14.079 --> 00:26:16.519
<v Speaker 1>and pret Burrara. You don't want to miss this. This

537
00:26:16.559 --> 00:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the Oath in the Office.

538
00:26:22.519 --> 00:26:25.400
<v Speaker 8>Hey all, Glenn Kirshner here, So friends, I hope you'll

539
00:26:25.480 --> 00:26:29.440
<v Speaker 8>join me on my audio podcast, Justice Matters. Do you

540
00:26:29.480 --> 00:26:34.519
<v Speaker 8>care about ethics and government, criminal justice, reform, a conflict

541
00:26:34.640 --> 00:26:36.440
<v Speaker 8>free federal judiciary?

542
00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:38.079
<v Speaker 7>I thought so.

543
00:26:38.920 --> 00:26:42.119
<v Speaker 8>On Justice Matters, we take on issues involving the need

544
00:26:42.200 --> 00:26:46.279
<v Speaker 8>to reform our government and its institutions, and we talk

545
00:26:46.319 --> 00:26:47.519
<v Speaker 8>about real.

546
00:26:47.680 --> 00:26:50.640
<v Speaker 7>Achievable reform. I hope you'll join us.

547
00:26:51.079 --> 00:26:55.079
<v Speaker 8>Look for Justice Matters wherever you usually get your podcasts.

548
00:27:00.160 --> 00:27:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the Oath in the Office. I'm Corey Bretschneider.

549
00:27:03.160 --> 00:27:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Today it's my pleasure to be joined by Prete Burra,

550
00:27:06.799 --> 00:27:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the host of the podcast Stay Tuned with Preed. It

551
00:27:09.559 --> 00:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>was my pleasure to be on that podcast with Prete

552
00:27:12.519 --> 00:27:14.799
<v Speaker 3>and to do a live event with him at the

553
00:27:14.799 --> 00:27:18.079
<v Speaker 3>New York Historical Preed, of course, is the former US

554
00:27:18.119 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Attorney for the Southern District of New York. He's a

555
00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:24.759
<v Speaker 3>former Justice Department official, and he also teaches at NYU

556
00:27:24.920 --> 00:27:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Law School in addition to his law practice.

557
00:27:27.799 --> 00:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Pre I want to start with the DOJ.

558
00:27:30.440 --> 00:27:34.319
<v Speaker 3>You've been inside that institution at a very different time

559
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in our history. And while I should say first welcome.

560
00:27:38.720 --> 00:27:41.480
<v Speaker 7>And nice to be here, Corey, thanks for having.

561
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Me, real pleasure to have you so as always saying,

562
00:27:44.039 --> 00:27:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've been inside the Department of Justice, but

563
00:27:46.240 --> 00:27:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it was a very different Department of Justice when you

564
00:27:48.920 --> 00:27:51.839
<v Speaker 3>were there. And I'm just hoping that we could start

565
00:27:51.880 --> 00:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>by orienting listeners and getting some of your thoughts about

566
00:27:54.960 --> 00:27:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the difference between the DJ that you were a part

567
00:27:57.680 --> 00:27:59.559
<v Speaker 3>of and what you're seeing right now.

568
00:28:00.440 --> 00:28:03.839
<v Speaker 7>So I was hired into the department as a young

569
00:28:03.880 --> 00:28:07.599
<v Speaker 7>prosecutor in the Bush administration, and there was no litmus

570
00:28:07.680 --> 00:28:12.319
<v Speaker 7>test for politics, and you weren't asked if you support

571
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:15.599
<v Speaker 7>the particular president, and you weren't asked who won the

572
00:28:15.640 --> 00:28:19.640
<v Speaker 7>last election, and nobody asked you your party affiliation, your ideology,

573
00:28:19.720 --> 00:28:21.240
<v Speaker 7>or anything else. And that is how it should be.

574
00:28:22.160 --> 00:28:24.559
<v Speaker 7>And when I was US attorney for almost eight years,

575
00:28:25.119 --> 00:28:28.759
<v Speaker 7>appointed by Barack Obama, I was a political appointee. But

576
00:28:28.880 --> 00:28:31.279
<v Speaker 7>all the assistant US attorneys we hired, the prosecutors and

577
00:28:31.559 --> 00:28:36.000
<v Speaker 7>the civil lawyers we hired. We hired without any attention

578
00:28:36.119 --> 00:28:40.480
<v Speaker 7>to or inquiry about their political affiliation, their party affiliation,

579
00:28:41.359 --> 00:28:44.519
<v Speaker 7>or their ideology. What mattered was do they have good judgment,

580
00:28:44.599 --> 00:28:47.920
<v Speaker 7>do they have good character? Do they practice their craft well?

581
00:28:49.000 --> 00:28:54.079
<v Speaker 7>And no doubt under Republican presidents the Democratic presidents, you know,

582
00:28:54.119 --> 00:28:57.240
<v Speaker 7>many people are independent, but you know, hired into the

583
00:28:57.319 --> 00:28:59.720
<v Speaker 7>ranks of the Justice Department were many people of opposing

584
00:28:59.799 --> 00:29:02.319
<v Speaker 7>and different points of view, but that did not matter.

585
00:29:03.079 --> 00:29:06.759
<v Speaker 7>Didn't matter. That seems to matter today. So that's point one,

586
00:29:07.599 --> 00:29:11.359
<v Speaker 7>and that's a terrible thing. Point two is, you know,

587
00:29:11.400 --> 00:29:14.559
<v Speaker 7>we had a pretty full Justice Department, most US attorney's

588
00:29:14.599 --> 00:29:17.680
<v Speaker 7>offices as well as the main office in Washington, you know,

589
00:29:17.799 --> 00:29:21.640
<v Speaker 7>the what we call Main Justice, you know, other than

590
00:29:21.720 --> 00:29:24.039
<v Speaker 7>on those occasions when there was a budget freeze or

591
00:29:24.759 --> 00:29:29.319
<v Speaker 7>you know, hiring freeze or a government shutdown, operated at

592
00:29:29.359 --> 00:29:33.039
<v Speaker 7>full capacity because you needed that to vindicate the rights

593
00:29:33.079 --> 00:29:36.880
<v Speaker 7>of victims, to maintain public safety, and to do the

594
00:29:36.960 --> 00:29:39.920
<v Speaker 7>job of justice. We now have, as I was talking

595
00:29:39.960 --> 00:29:42.440
<v Speaker 7>about on my own podcast just a couple of hours ago,

596
00:29:43.079 --> 00:29:47.480
<v Speaker 7>a fleeing of massive numbers of line prosecutors, some of

597
00:29:47.519 --> 00:29:49.200
<v Speaker 7>them being fired, some of them being relieved of their

598
00:29:49.279 --> 00:29:52.480
<v Speaker 7>duties from US attorney's offices all around the country and

599
00:29:52.519 --> 00:29:56.880
<v Speaker 7>from the Washington office in the district of Minnesota itself,

600
00:29:57.079 --> 00:29:59.079
<v Speaker 7>which is the scene of a lot of you know,

601
00:29:59.599 --> 00:30:03.680
<v Speaker 7>terrible things and government overreach. They've gone from an office

602
00:30:03.680 --> 00:30:07.519
<v Speaker 7>of fifty I think, to twenty, which, if I'm doing

603
00:30:07.559 --> 00:30:10.359
<v Speaker 7>the math correctly, the sixty percent decrease. We used to

604
00:30:10.359 --> 00:30:15.480
<v Speaker 7>fight for every single full time employee allocation in budget

605
00:30:16.160 --> 00:30:18.480
<v Speaker 7>with our lives because it was so important everyone had

606
00:30:18.519 --> 00:30:21.599
<v Speaker 7>a full docket. But more troubling than the lack of

607
00:30:21.799 --> 00:30:26.880
<v Speaker 7>staff and the diminution of the ranks of prosecutors is why, right,

608
00:30:26.920 --> 00:30:29.759
<v Speaker 7>you have people who were hired, you know, some of

609
00:30:29.799 --> 00:30:33.880
<v Speaker 7>them many many years ago, served multiple administrations. We're screened

610
00:30:33.880 --> 00:30:36.480
<v Speaker 7>not only for talent and craft and legal competency, but

611
00:30:36.519 --> 00:30:41.279
<v Speaker 7>also for character and integrity and ethics. Who are leaving

612
00:30:41.319 --> 00:30:44.640
<v Speaker 7>because they think they're being asked to do things that

613
00:30:44.720 --> 00:30:47.240
<v Speaker 7>are contrary to their oath and contrary to their conscience,

614
00:30:48.160 --> 00:30:51.400
<v Speaker 7>and that's why they're leaving, and that's that's a terrible

615
00:30:51.400 --> 00:30:53.559
<v Speaker 7>and heartbreaking thing. And the American so I can go,

616
00:30:53.599 --> 00:30:54.880
<v Speaker 7>I could go on and on an onion.

617
00:30:56.119 --> 00:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what do you think of the on that theme.

618
00:30:58.359 --> 00:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one of the stories that we've been

619
00:31:00.119 --> 00:31:02.640
<v Speaker 3>talking about is the coverage about how hard it is

620
00:31:02.680 --> 00:31:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to even do recruitment in the Department of Justice now

621
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:06.799
<v Speaker 3>that it used to be.

622
00:31:06.920 --> 00:31:09.359
<v Speaker 7>It used to be the In fact, you never saw.

623
00:31:09.599 --> 00:31:12.279
<v Speaker 7>I think people are tweeting about openings of the Justice

624
00:31:12.279 --> 00:31:15.480
<v Speaker 7>Department there. I don't know if they're a billboard, but

625
00:31:15.519 --> 00:31:17.079
<v Speaker 7>there used to be a billboard.

626
00:31:16.839 --> 00:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Like one eight hundred lawyer.

627
00:31:19.400 --> 00:31:24.799
<v Speaker 7>It was the most coveted I still like printages prestigious,

628
00:31:24.839 --> 00:31:30.640
<v Speaker 7>most coveted jobs. I mean, people would leave highly lucrative

629
00:31:30.680 --> 00:31:34.240
<v Speaker 7>private practice for the opportunity to serve at a government's wage

630
00:31:35.119 --> 00:31:38.240
<v Speaker 7>in the Department of Justice, at various US Attorney's offices.

631
00:31:38.680 --> 00:31:42.640
<v Speaker 7>You know, I recruited back people who took people who

632
00:31:42.640 --> 00:31:44.559
<v Speaker 7>were in the office, and then I needed, you know,

633
00:31:44.599 --> 00:31:47.839
<v Speaker 7>a leadership position filled and people will I mean, who

634
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:51.880
<v Speaker 7>does this in life? People took ninety five percent pay cuts,

635
00:31:52.799 --> 00:31:55.200
<v Speaker 7>people making two three four million dollars a year came

636
00:31:55.200 --> 00:31:59.079
<v Speaker 7>back for one hundred and fifty thousand, right so they

637
00:31:59.079 --> 00:32:02.519
<v Speaker 7>could serve the who leaves millions of dollars on the

638
00:32:02.559 --> 00:32:08.440
<v Speaker 7>table for a job, you know, in the government. Some

639
00:32:08.480 --> 00:32:09.920
<v Speaker 7>people do it, not not many people do.

640
00:32:10.519 --> 00:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think that you know, part of

641
00:32:11.960 --> 00:32:15.079
<v Speaker 3>the story, of course, that we're talking about and that

642
00:32:15.119 --> 00:32:19.759
<v Speaker 3>you're discussing is the increasing lack of competence in the DOJ,

643
00:32:19.920 --> 00:32:22.720
<v Speaker 3>because if you're not able to recruit high quality people, you're.

644
00:32:22.640 --> 00:32:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Going to wind up with worse lawyering. I'm wondering how

645
00:32:25.279 --> 00:32:25.839
<v Speaker 2>that plays out.

646
00:32:25.839 --> 00:32:28.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is one possibility that there's a I'm always

647
00:32:28.400 --> 00:32:31.559
<v Speaker 3>looking for the hopeful story that in some ways, although

648
00:32:31.599 --> 00:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a kind of destruction of the Department of Justice

649
00:32:35.039 --> 00:32:37.839
<v Speaker 3>in its main functioning, that when it comes to some

650
00:32:38.000 --> 00:32:42.279
<v Speaker 3>of the ambitions of Donald Trump to destroy democracy, I mean,

651
00:32:42.319 --> 00:32:45.000
<v Speaker 3>does that in some ways protect us having more incompetent

652
00:32:45.039 --> 00:32:46.839
<v Speaker 3>lawyers in the Department of Justice?

653
00:32:47.000 --> 00:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that too optimistic? That can still do damage and

654
00:32:49.559 --> 00:32:50.319
<v Speaker 2>be incompetent.

655
00:32:50.559 --> 00:32:53.119
<v Speaker 7>Well, they can do both. They can do both in Garden.

656
00:32:54.279 --> 00:32:59.039
<v Speaker 7>It still is the case, Corey that the garden variety

657
00:32:59.079 --> 00:33:01.759
<v Speaker 7>cases that offices deal with are not about Donald Trump,

658
00:33:02.480 --> 00:33:05.960
<v Speaker 7>not about Michael Flynn, They're not about Hunter Biden, They're

659
00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:10.400
<v Speaker 7>not about Jeffrey Epstein, right, They're about you know, unnamed

660
00:33:10.640 --> 00:33:16.200
<v Speaker 7>and and unfamous victims and perpetrators who are brought to

661
00:33:16.319 --> 00:33:20.000
<v Speaker 7>justice every day in the various offices. So their lack

662
00:33:20.039 --> 00:33:23.599
<v Speaker 7>of resources is a problem. Their lack of competence is

663
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:26.880
<v Speaker 7>a problem, because the wheels of justice already, I think

664
00:33:27.160 --> 00:33:31.319
<v Speaker 7>per many people grind slow, and they only grind more slowly. Now,

665
00:33:31.359 --> 00:33:36.359
<v Speaker 7>with respect to those those certain politicized, weaponized cases, you

666
00:33:36.400 --> 00:33:39.880
<v Speaker 7>were exactly you were exactly right. They may be an ethical,

667
00:33:40.599 --> 00:33:44.720
<v Speaker 7>they may be you know, weaponizing, but they're also incompetent.

668
00:33:45.079 --> 00:33:46.720
<v Speaker 7>And you saw that in New Jersey, and you saw

669
00:33:46.759 --> 00:33:48.960
<v Speaker 7>that in Virginia, and you see that in a lot

670
00:33:49.000 --> 00:33:51.720
<v Speaker 7>of places. So I guess that's sort of a silver lining.

671
00:33:52.599 --> 00:33:54.240
<v Speaker 7>You have people who don't even know how to present

672
00:33:54.240 --> 00:33:58.880
<v Speaker 7>to a grand jury indicting a former FBI director. That's

673
00:33:58.920 --> 00:34:00.599
<v Speaker 7>probably to everyone is benefit.

674
00:34:01.720 --> 00:34:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask you more about the weaponization the

675
00:34:05.160 --> 00:34:07.519
<v Speaker 3>political prosecutions, but I have a follow up on the

676
00:34:07.640 --> 00:34:10.559
<v Speaker 3>interesting theme that you're carving out, which is I want

677
00:34:10.599 --> 00:34:13.639
<v Speaker 3>you to react to. There's a theory that law professors

678
00:34:13.639 --> 00:34:17.199
<v Speaker 3>are increasingly embracing of a kind of dual regime, that

679
00:34:17.320 --> 00:34:20.039
<v Speaker 3>there's a kind of lawlessness. The theory which goes back

680
00:34:20.079 --> 00:34:23.280
<v Speaker 3>to a theory of fascism and various ideas of dictatorship.

681
00:34:23.320 --> 00:34:25.840
<v Speaker 3>That there's a theory that says, when it comes to

682
00:34:26.599 --> 00:34:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the dictator, there's lawlessness, but you still might have a

683
00:34:29.840 --> 00:34:34.119
<v Speaker 3>normal functioning rule of law state in relation to normal people.

684
00:34:34.159 --> 00:34:35.840
<v Speaker 2>But in a way I hear you saying maybe the.

685
00:34:35.760 --> 00:34:39.159
<v Speaker 3>Opposite, which is that you know, actually exactly where we

686
00:34:39.239 --> 00:34:42.559
<v Speaker 3>want the rule of law to function, prosecutions of the

687
00:34:42.639 --> 00:34:45.800
<v Speaker 3>bad guys, of those who have committed serious violent crimes,

688
00:34:45.880 --> 00:34:49.039
<v Speaker 3>that maybe there we're lacking the kind of competence that

689
00:34:49.079 --> 00:34:50.679
<v Speaker 3>we need even for the rule of law.

690
00:34:50.840 --> 00:34:53.599
<v Speaker 2>So I don't does it go too far to say that, really, I.

691
00:34:53.599 --> 00:34:57.239
<v Speaker 7>Think you look at some it's look, prosecutors do two

692
00:34:57.320 --> 00:35:00.559
<v Speaker 7>things roughly right. And this is actually car doubt in

693
00:35:00.679 --> 00:35:03.800
<v Speaker 7>law and order the first half hour and second etat right,

694
00:35:03.880 --> 00:35:07.519
<v Speaker 7>and unlike law and order makes out where it's only

695
00:35:07.559 --> 00:35:10.079
<v Speaker 7>the law enforcement agents who carry guns do the investigation.

696
00:35:10.239 --> 00:35:13.719
<v Speaker 7>Prosecutors do the prosecuting and the trial work. I believe

697
00:35:13.719 --> 00:35:16.199
<v Speaker 7>in the federal system they do. The prosecutors do both.

698
00:35:17.039 --> 00:35:20.800
<v Speaker 7>And so if you have limited resources, what are the

699
00:35:20.800 --> 00:35:23.480
<v Speaker 7>things that you urgently have to deal with? You have

700
00:35:23.519 --> 00:35:26.880
<v Speaker 7>to deal with already indicted cases of defendants who are

701
00:35:26.920 --> 00:35:30.079
<v Speaker 7>already in the dock, right, So you've indicted a case,

702
00:35:30.119 --> 00:35:32.760
<v Speaker 7>there's a suppression hearing in a week. The judge has

703
00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:34.880
<v Speaker 7>ordered everyone to show up and to have here. You

704
00:35:34.920 --> 00:35:37.639
<v Speaker 7>have to do that hearing, right, you have to have

705
00:35:38.320 --> 00:35:41.400
<v Speaker 7>And so if both prosecutors on the case resigned the

706
00:35:41.440 --> 00:35:43.039
<v Speaker 7>week before, you got to find a new prosecutor get

707
00:35:43.079 --> 00:35:44.400
<v Speaker 7>up to speed, right a way. You have to do

708
00:35:44.440 --> 00:35:47.639
<v Speaker 7>that because as a court proceeding and humans have to

709
00:35:47.679 --> 00:35:50.440
<v Speaker 7>show up and do the work. The things that are

710
00:35:50.440 --> 00:35:54.000
<v Speaker 7>not on the same timetable are investigations. So let's say

711
00:35:54.000 --> 00:35:56.840
<v Speaker 7>you have three prosecutors working with three FBI agents to

712
00:35:57.000 --> 00:35:59.320
<v Speaker 7>root out corruption in the state capital of a state.

713
00:36:00.360 --> 00:36:03.960
<v Speaker 7>You know that deadline is just a statue of limitations, right,

714
00:36:04.320 --> 00:36:06.400
<v Speaker 7>And so that might be the most important thing going

715
00:36:06.440 --> 00:36:09.159
<v Speaker 7>on in the office, not the garden variety case that

716
00:36:09.199 --> 00:36:12.199
<v Speaker 7>has a suppression hearing the following week, but chasing down

717
00:36:12.239 --> 00:36:15.679
<v Speaker 7>witnesses before they destroy evidence, before they get rid of

718
00:36:15.719 --> 00:36:18.199
<v Speaker 7>their ill gotten gains. But that's what's not going to

719
00:36:18.239 --> 00:36:22.719
<v Speaker 7>get done because that's not what where you need humans necessarily,

720
00:36:23.039 --> 00:36:25.239
<v Speaker 7>because it's not a suppression hearing that's been scheduled on

721
00:36:25.280 --> 00:36:29.199
<v Speaker 7>the docket. You know what I'm saying so so lots

722
00:36:29.199 --> 00:36:31.679
<v Speaker 7>and lots of and people don't see it right away,

723
00:36:31.719 --> 00:36:34.719
<v Speaker 7>but there's an opportunity cost when you pick one thing

724
00:36:35.400 --> 00:36:38.599
<v Speaker 7>versus another thing. Yeah, and that's what you worry about.

725
00:36:38.960 --> 00:36:42.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And of course the worry is that the incompetence

726
00:36:42.159 --> 00:36:44.480
<v Speaker 3>of the DOJ isn't just short term, that even if

727
00:36:44.519 --> 00:36:48.320
<v Speaker 3>we survive this Trump presidency, there might be long term damage,

728
00:36:48.360 --> 00:36:52.079
<v Speaker 3>and the damage might go beyond the immediate political prosecutions

729
00:36:52.119 --> 00:36:55.119
<v Speaker 3>to more general harm to the system of justice. I

730
00:36:55.119 --> 00:36:58.199
<v Speaker 3>did want to pivot to ask you about the political prosecutions,

731
00:36:58.239 --> 00:37:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, and I'm interested you mention in James Comy

732
00:37:01.199 --> 00:37:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and Letitia James.

733
00:37:02.320 --> 00:37:03.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm interested in your thoughts.

734
00:37:03.639 --> 00:37:07.039
<v Speaker 3>They seem to me at least to be raw instances

735
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of political prosecutions by prosecutors who are choosing loyalty over So.

736
00:37:13.679 --> 00:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was my first question. Am I missing anything?

737
00:37:16.000 --> 00:37:18.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the more complicated case and maybe more interesting

738
00:37:18.599 --> 00:37:21.880
<v Speaker 3>one to get into is the Bolton case. And you know,

739
00:37:21.960 --> 00:37:24.760
<v Speaker 3>there is an argument that there it's more of at

740
00:37:24.840 --> 00:37:27.840
<v Speaker 3>least a hybrid. Clearly there is an element of retaliation,

741
00:37:28.599 --> 00:37:31.880
<v Speaker 3>but the argument is that there really were national security

742
00:37:31.960 --> 00:37:35.000
<v Speaker 3>issues that he might have acted in a criminal way,

743
00:37:35.039 --> 00:37:36.719
<v Speaker 3>and so I wonder I mean that to help us

744
00:37:36.760 --> 00:37:39.320
<v Speaker 3>puzzle through that. I mean, what do you do when

745
00:37:39.360 --> 00:37:42.199
<v Speaker 3>there is some element of law breaking, but there also

746
00:37:42.360 --> 00:37:44.239
<v Speaker 3>is this political motivation?

747
00:37:44.400 --> 00:37:45.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you analyze that case?

748
00:37:45.960 --> 00:37:47.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm interested, of course in your thoughts on

749
00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Komy and James as well.

750
00:37:49.599 --> 00:37:52.000
<v Speaker 7>So sometimes it's hard to figure this out, particularly for

751
00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:54.800
<v Speaker 7>your late person. It's also hard to figure out if

752
00:37:54.800 --> 00:37:57.719
<v Speaker 7>you're not involved in the case and you have prosecuted experience,

753
00:37:58.360 --> 00:38:00.960
<v Speaker 7>so you have certain ndisha whether something as kosher or

754
00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:05.000
<v Speaker 7>not right. One indicator is whether or not And this

755
00:38:05.039 --> 00:38:06.679
<v Speaker 7>is not a question that had to be asked before.

756
00:38:07.639 --> 00:38:10.719
<v Speaker 7>Did the President of the United States post on social

757
00:38:10.760 --> 00:38:15.840
<v Speaker 7>media flatly his interest in sending it a prison, perhaps

758
00:38:15.960 --> 00:38:17.800
<v Speaker 7>to the death penalty, which he's done with certain people,

759
00:38:18.400 --> 00:38:22.320
<v Speaker 7>and pronounced you guilty. That's a marker that any prosecution

760
00:38:22.400 --> 00:38:27.079
<v Speaker 7>that follows is bs and is weaponized. Second thing you

761
00:38:27.079 --> 00:38:30.760
<v Speaker 7>can look at are the charging documents themselves. You read

762
00:38:30.760 --> 00:38:33.599
<v Speaker 7>it like if you read the Bolton indictment. And I've

763
00:38:33.639 --> 00:38:35.679
<v Speaker 7>read a lot of indictments, and my name is affixed

764
00:38:35.679 --> 00:38:38.000
<v Speaker 7>to hundreds of indictments that have been filed in court,

765
00:38:39.239 --> 00:38:41.800
<v Speaker 7>it has a certain theft. There are certain things in

766
00:38:41.840 --> 00:38:43.679
<v Speaker 7>there that you think, huh, I wonder how he's going

767
00:38:43.760 --> 00:38:46.639
<v Speaker 7>to defend against this not pre judging is presumed innocent,

768
00:38:47.400 --> 00:38:49.599
<v Speaker 7>and there may be defenses, and there may be. It's

769
00:38:49.599 --> 00:38:52.199
<v Speaker 7>one side of the story, but it's quite a story

770
00:38:52.480 --> 00:38:55.679
<v Speaker 7>of his sharing information with members of his family for

771
00:38:55.719 --> 00:38:58.360
<v Speaker 7>purposes of writing a book that are clearly classified. You know,

772
00:38:58.360 --> 00:38:59.559
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how that's going to work out. But

773
00:38:59.760 --> 00:39:03.920
<v Speaker 7>you read it and you don't think it's trash. Then

774
00:39:03.920 --> 00:39:07.880
<v Speaker 7>you read the coffee indictment and you think that's trash.

775
00:39:08.440 --> 00:39:12.679
<v Speaker 7>Then the third indicator for outsiders, I think, and then

776
00:39:12.679 --> 00:39:16.519
<v Speaker 7>maybe others is you know, who else was involved in

777
00:39:16.559 --> 00:39:19.679
<v Speaker 7>the decision making outside of the people who were beholden

778
00:39:20.039 --> 00:39:22.880
<v Speaker 7>to the guy who posted the truth social send these

779
00:39:22.880 --> 00:39:26.880
<v Speaker 7>people to prison. And in the case of Bolton, again

780
00:39:26.920 --> 00:39:29.639
<v Speaker 7>it's not just positive at all. There was a search

781
00:39:29.679 --> 00:39:32.960
<v Speaker 7>executed and that search was authorized by a court, So

782
00:39:33.000 --> 00:39:36.880
<v Speaker 7>there was the intercession of a court. That just gives you,

783
00:39:36.880 --> 00:39:40.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, one data point that somebody found outside of

784
00:39:40.360 --> 00:39:44.960
<v Speaker 7>the executive branch found there to be some support, probable

785
00:39:45.000 --> 00:39:47.960
<v Speaker 7>cause support which is substantial that a crime was committed,

786
00:39:48.559 --> 00:39:52.320
<v Speaker 7>right On the other hand, in the James James case

787
00:39:52.400 --> 00:39:56.559
<v Speaker 7>in particular, the first indictment was dismissed. Then we understand

788
00:39:56.559 --> 00:40:00.840
<v Speaker 7>from reporting they went to a grand jury. No true,

789
00:40:00.840 --> 00:40:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Bill rejected the indictment. They went to a grand jury again,

790
00:40:04.119 --> 00:40:07.440
<v Speaker 7>which by the way, is like unheard of and contrary

791
00:40:07.480 --> 00:40:10.360
<v Speaker 7>to policy. So you have a dismissal by a judge.

792
00:40:10.719 --> 00:40:14.079
<v Speaker 7>So you have the truth social getter. She happens to

793
00:40:14.079 --> 00:40:16.519
<v Speaker 7>be a political adversary perceived by the president to biblical

794
00:40:16.599 --> 00:40:20.599
<v Speaker 7>adversary of the president. You have a dismissal of the indictment.

795
00:40:20.920 --> 00:40:22.760
<v Speaker 7>Then you have one grand jury said no way. You

796
00:40:22.760 --> 00:40:24.719
<v Speaker 7>have a second grand jury that said no way. You

797
00:40:24.760 --> 00:40:28.159
<v Speaker 7>don't have to be Clarence Darrow or his or his

798
00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:32.360
<v Speaker 7>prosecutorial analog to think something's rotten in Denmark.

799
00:40:32.960 --> 00:40:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, but what's your bottom line on the

800
00:40:35.920 --> 00:40:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Bolton case working through that?

801
00:40:37.679 --> 00:40:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And I wasn't because.

802
00:40:40.480 --> 00:40:41.920
<v Speaker 7>The bottom line, but I'm just saying, look.

803
00:40:41.880 --> 00:40:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because well, I guess my thought is, and we

804
00:40:44.480 --> 00:40:47.440
<v Speaker 3>could abstract from the details, but I guess my thought is,

805
00:40:47.679 --> 00:40:49.519
<v Speaker 3>even if the way you still.

806
00:40:49.719 --> 00:40:53.079
<v Speaker 7>Sorry, yeah, it is still the body of law that

807
00:40:53.199 --> 00:40:58.239
<v Speaker 7>exists about Melissia's and selective prosecution. Yeah, and where people

808
00:40:58.280 --> 00:41:01.400
<v Speaker 7>have won on those motions, have not one on the

809
00:41:01.400 --> 00:41:04.599
<v Speaker 7>basis of innocence, right, They've won on the basis of

810
00:41:04.639 --> 00:41:06.159
<v Speaker 7>selectivity and maliciousness.

811
00:41:06.239 --> 00:41:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Right.

812
00:41:06.760 --> 00:41:10.320
<v Speaker 7>So it is not necessary. It's a tough uphill road

813
00:41:10.360 --> 00:41:12.239
<v Speaker 7>in any case where you bring such a suit or

814
00:41:12.320 --> 00:41:15.119
<v Speaker 7>such a challenge, but it is not bound up with

815
00:41:15.159 --> 00:41:19.199
<v Speaker 7>your innocence. Right if you happen to be innocent, right

816
00:41:19.960 --> 00:41:22.880
<v Speaker 7>to have the ability to show that there's no harmful

817
00:41:22.920 --> 00:41:25.880
<v Speaker 7>evidence against you, that bolsters your argument that it was

818
00:41:25.920 --> 00:41:28.800
<v Speaker 7>malicious and selective, because why are you going after somebody

819
00:41:28.800 --> 00:41:31.559
<v Speaker 7>who's innocent? But it is not necessary, no.

820
00:41:31.920 --> 00:41:34.559
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, interesting, And I mean I see the point,

821
00:41:34.559 --> 00:41:36.880
<v Speaker 3>which is that in the Bolton case, even if it's

822
00:41:36.920 --> 00:41:40.320
<v Speaker 3>true that there are all sorts of indicators that there

823
00:41:40.360 --> 00:41:43.760
<v Speaker 3>really is guiltyre the fact that Trump has targeted him,

824
00:41:44.000 --> 00:41:46.960
<v Speaker 3>that might turn out to be the thing that makes

825
00:41:46.960 --> 00:41:48.679
<v Speaker 3>the difference here in whether or not this is or

826
00:41:48.760 --> 00:41:51.280
<v Speaker 3>is not a selective prosecution, even if he is guilty.

827
00:41:51.679 --> 00:41:51.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

828
00:41:51.920 --> 00:41:55.079
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to pivot pre to a question that's on

829
00:41:55.280 --> 00:41:58.159
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people's minds, and it's the question of

830
00:41:58.639 --> 00:42:01.679
<v Speaker 3>what those in the dog should do. The career lawyers

831
00:42:01.679 --> 00:42:03.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about when it comes to the question of

832
00:42:03.760 --> 00:42:06.679
<v Speaker 3>resign or stay. Of course, in Minnesota, we've seen a

833
00:42:06.800 --> 00:42:11.760
<v Speaker 3>number of resignations connected to the ICE's role there to

834
00:42:11.920 --> 00:42:15.559
<v Speaker 3>questions of going after even one of the victim's partners.

835
00:42:16.199 --> 00:42:17.519
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, how do you see that?

836
00:42:17.559 --> 00:42:20.039
<v Speaker 3>What kind of advice would you give to a member

837
00:42:20.599 --> 00:42:23.360
<v Speaker 3>of the Department of Justice. Now, I mean, I'd invite

838
00:42:23.400 --> 00:42:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you too, to reflect on your own famous controversy where,

839
00:42:27.000 --> 00:42:29.559
<v Speaker 3>of course you decided not to resign during the first

840
00:42:29.559 --> 00:42:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration as a matter of principle, and we're ultimately

841
00:42:33.320 --> 00:42:36.039
<v Speaker 3>fired in Trump one point zero by Trump.

842
00:42:36.159 --> 00:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And if that's a lesson in any way in any

843
00:42:39.000 --> 00:42:39.199
<v Speaker 2>of this.

844
00:42:40.239 --> 00:42:42.920
<v Speaker 7>It's very difficult, you know, and my view on this

845
00:42:43.000 --> 00:42:45.280
<v Speaker 7>has evolved, and it depends on the particular circumstances you

846
00:42:45.320 --> 00:42:48.880
<v Speaker 7>find yourself. And so if you're the problem is if

847
00:42:48.880 --> 00:42:53.280
<v Speaker 7>you are involved in a particular, specific, concrete matter, and

848
00:42:53.320 --> 00:42:57.119
<v Speaker 7>you've been given a directive to do something, let's say,

849
00:42:57.639 --> 00:43:03.039
<v Speaker 7>pursue indictment or you know, dismiss a case you thought

850
00:43:03.119 --> 00:43:05.760
<v Speaker 7>was a righteous case. You're not the turney in the

851
00:43:05.840 --> 00:43:08.960
<v Speaker 7>United States. You know, there's a chain of command. You

852
00:43:09.000 --> 00:43:15.039
<v Speaker 7>can either do the thing that you think is wrong, unethical, immoral, unlawful, unconstitutional, that,

853
00:43:15.159 --> 00:43:17.760
<v Speaker 7>by the way, this is not a small thing, may

854
00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:20.079
<v Speaker 7>put your bar license in jeopardy at some point in

855
00:43:20.119 --> 00:43:23.440
<v Speaker 7>the future. You kind of don't have the option of

856
00:43:23.480 --> 00:43:26.239
<v Speaker 7>doing the thing that you think is correct. You kind

857
00:43:26.239 --> 00:43:28.440
<v Speaker 7>of have no choice but to step down. If you

858
00:43:28.519 --> 00:43:31.719
<v Speaker 7>are the head of the office and you insist on

859
00:43:32.480 --> 00:43:36.320
<v Speaker 7>taking a particular action, which you can do right, then

860
00:43:36.440 --> 00:43:39.519
<v Speaker 7>you can force your firing, which I'm partial to, I'm

861
00:43:39.519 --> 00:43:43.719
<v Speaker 7>partial to making people fire you on their grounds which

862
00:43:43.800 --> 00:43:46.440
<v Speaker 7>can be seen to be you know, false or fraudulent

863
00:43:46.679 --> 00:43:50.599
<v Speaker 7>or improper, rather than giving them a bye. But you

864
00:43:50.639 --> 00:43:53.800
<v Speaker 7>really kind of have no choice. Then there's a more complicated,

865
00:43:53.840 --> 00:43:58.400
<v Speaker 7>i think region in which you're kind of, you know,

866
00:43:58.480 --> 00:44:00.840
<v Speaker 7>in a position of authority somewhere in the Justice Department.

867
00:44:01.440 --> 00:44:04.679
<v Speaker 7>No one has asked you to do a particular, concrete

868
00:44:04.679 --> 00:44:08.639
<v Speaker 7>things that goes against your conscience or your oath or

869
00:44:08.639 --> 00:44:11.480
<v Speaker 7>the law as you understand it. But there's you know, overall,

870
00:44:11.519 --> 00:44:14.920
<v Speaker 7>but people around you are doing those things. And in

871
00:44:14.960 --> 00:44:18.039
<v Speaker 7>that situation, it's the same moral dilemma that has been

872
00:44:18.079 --> 00:44:21.199
<v Speaker 7>faced by lots of including you know, chiefs of staff

873
00:44:21.199 --> 00:44:22.920
<v Speaker 7>in the Trump White House, in the first term and

874
00:44:23.480 --> 00:44:27.639
<v Speaker 7>in the second term, which is, if I leave, someone

875
00:44:27.679 --> 00:44:32.960
<v Speaker 7>with less ethics and less morality and less integrity is

876
00:44:33.000 --> 00:44:35.760
<v Speaker 7>going to take my spot. So I should fight for

877
00:44:35.800 --> 00:44:40.320
<v Speaker 7>what I can fight for here. And I increasingly don't

878
00:44:40.360 --> 00:44:43.280
<v Speaker 7>buy that. I think it depends on well, it sounds

879
00:44:43.320 --> 00:44:47.760
<v Speaker 7>all well and good, but you're tainting yourself and yourself

880
00:44:48.039 --> 00:44:51.519
<v Speaker 7>and complicity is bad, and you're enabling things. No doubt,

881
00:44:51.519 --> 00:44:54.239
<v Speaker 7>it's true. You have somebody who you know. There are

882
00:44:54.239 --> 00:44:57.559
<v Speaker 7>people who've been in the Trump orbit, including Jeff Sessions

883
00:44:57.599 --> 00:45:02.159
<v Speaker 7>and Bill Barr, who were not paragons of virtue in

884
00:45:02.199 --> 00:45:05.480
<v Speaker 7>my book as attorneys general, but they had lines right,

885
00:45:05.519 --> 00:45:08.840
<v Speaker 7>They had some lines right, And every time somebody with

886
00:45:08.920 --> 00:45:13.519
<v Speaker 7>some lines steps away or gets removed, somebody with fewer

887
00:45:13.519 --> 00:45:16.199
<v Speaker 7>lines or no lines can take their place. Yeah, so

888
00:45:16.360 --> 00:45:18.280
<v Speaker 7>this is no you're the professor.

889
00:45:19.559 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems to me.

890
00:45:22.079 --> 00:45:24.639
<v Speaker 7>I'm just trying to show my work. I don't know, Yeah,

891
00:45:25.679 --> 00:45:28.559
<v Speaker 7>trying to be thoughtful about this. It's just a really

892
00:45:28.679 --> 00:45:31.119
<v Speaker 7>tough thing. And there are arguments in favor of staying,

893
00:45:31.119 --> 00:45:34.199
<v Speaker 7>the arguments in favor of going. As more time goes by,

894
00:45:35.480 --> 00:45:36.679
<v Speaker 7>I tend to favor going.

895
00:45:37.280 --> 00:45:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and if it's just a matter of conscience. I mean,

896
00:45:39.280 --> 00:45:41.719
<v Speaker 3>this is just fitting with your thought process.

897
00:45:41.760 --> 00:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Here.

898
00:45:42.679 --> 00:45:44.719
<v Speaker 3>More and more we have people around who seem to

899
00:45:44.760 --> 00:45:47.880
<v Speaker 3>have no conscience. And when I look at Pambondi, it's

900
00:45:47.880 --> 00:45:50.280
<v Speaker 3>not just unethical behavior, but I imagine some of it

901
00:45:50.400 --> 00:45:52.920
<v Speaker 3>might be even criminal. I don't know if you think

902
00:45:52.960 --> 00:45:55.239
<v Speaker 3>that goes too far. And then over time, as the

903
00:45:55.280 --> 00:45:58.880
<v Speaker 3>people of conscience over two terms have resigned, what we're

904
00:45:58.960 --> 00:46:01.760
<v Speaker 3>left with our loyalists who seem to have no line.

905
00:46:01.800 --> 00:46:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So I wonder how relevant any of this advice becomes.

906
00:46:04.519 --> 00:46:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Then if if it's pure loyalists who don't even have

907
00:46:07.599 --> 00:46:10.639
<v Speaker 3>the kind of conscience and you know, careful you also

908
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:14.400
<v Speaker 3>of course teach or a professor professorial way of seeing

909
00:46:14.679 --> 00:46:15.360
<v Speaker 3>this dilemma.

910
00:46:16.000 --> 00:46:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Look, the arrival of Donald Trump on the scene

911
00:46:19.280 --> 00:46:21.400
<v Speaker 7>has put a spotlight on some people who have courage.

912
00:46:21.960 --> 00:46:25.639
<v Speaker 7>But sadly, I think the record reflects that it shows

913
00:46:25.679 --> 00:46:28.239
<v Speaker 7>a lot more people about whom you didn't you think

914
00:46:28.280 --> 00:46:32.000
<v Speaker 7>of what their moral fiber was or the makeup of

915
00:46:32.039 --> 00:46:35.360
<v Speaker 7>their spine was, who don't have courage and like to

916
00:46:35.360 --> 00:46:37.719
<v Speaker 7>hold onto power. I mean, for me, you know, it's

917
00:46:37.719 --> 00:46:41.559
<v Speaker 7>interesting you talked about my controversy. My sin, it sounds

918
00:46:41.559 --> 00:46:46.719
<v Speaker 7>so quaint now, was determining that as the independent, somewhat

919
00:46:46.760 --> 00:46:49.519
<v Speaker 7>independent United Attorney and the Southerners good New York, that

920
00:46:49.639 --> 00:46:51.440
<v Speaker 7>I shouldn't speak to the sitting president of the United

921
00:46:51.480 --> 00:46:54.079
<v Speaker 7>States who had called and left a message, that I

922
00:46:54.079 --> 00:46:56.960
<v Speaker 7>shouldn't speak to him without knowing what the nature of

923
00:46:56.960 --> 00:46:59.440
<v Speaker 7>the call was, given my jurisdiction over various of his

924
00:46:59.519 --> 00:47:04.599
<v Speaker 7>properties businesses, the appearance of impropriety, especially when that call

925
00:47:04.679 --> 00:47:07.440
<v Speaker 7>was not made under the auspices of some you know,

926
00:47:07.519 --> 00:47:12.119
<v Speaker 7>program or policy, and Jeff Sessions wasn't involved. And I

927
00:47:12.159 --> 00:47:13.840
<v Speaker 7>never said that I wouldn't talk to the president in

928
00:47:13.920 --> 00:47:18.440
<v Speaker 7>any circumstance. But you know, my integrity told me, and

929
00:47:18.519 --> 00:47:21.679
<v Speaker 7>my training told me, and the example of the REDA. Lynch,

930
00:47:21.960 --> 00:47:24.480
<v Speaker 7>the former Attorney General on the tarmac with Bill Clinton,

931
00:47:24.599 --> 00:47:27.800
<v Speaker 7>all told me don't talk to the president, and twenty

932
00:47:27.800 --> 00:47:30.519
<v Speaker 7>hours later I was told to step down, as were others.

933
00:47:30.559 --> 00:47:33.159
<v Speaker 7>But I'm positive there's a link between my refusal to

934
00:47:33.159 --> 00:47:35.800
<v Speaker 7>talk to the president and my being asked to step down.

935
00:47:36.519 --> 00:47:37.199
<v Speaker 7>How quaint is.

936
00:47:37.280 --> 00:47:39.280
<v Speaker 2>That, Yeah, can even imagine that?

937
00:47:39.360 --> 00:47:42.320
<v Speaker 7>And that was the best job, Yeah, you know, I

938
00:47:42.360 --> 00:47:43.880
<v Speaker 7>loved the job so much and thought it was such

939
00:47:43.920 --> 00:47:46.880
<v Speaker 7>an important position to have. I didn't vote for Donald Trump.

940
00:47:47.199 --> 00:47:50.559
<v Speaker 7>I didn't have respect for him as a politician, but

941
00:47:50.639 --> 00:47:53.159
<v Speaker 7>I accepted his offer to stay on because I thought

942
00:47:53.159 --> 00:47:55.519
<v Speaker 7>I would be left alone in the sovereign District of

943
00:47:55.519 --> 00:47:57.320
<v Speaker 7>New York to do my work and not to pat

944
00:47:57.360 --> 00:48:00.440
<v Speaker 7>myself in the back. And I lost my Job's fine,

945
00:48:00.679 --> 00:48:04.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm thriving here. I am with you, right and and

946
00:48:04.039 --> 00:48:06.320
<v Speaker 7>there's so many people who can't.

947
00:48:06.159 --> 00:48:08.679
<v Speaker 3>Allow it's not that great that you want to be there,

948
00:48:08.719 --> 00:48:11.320
<v Speaker 3>no matter what I mean. I think too, it's an

949
00:48:11.360 --> 00:48:14.039
<v Speaker 3>illustration of the difference between the world. I mean almost

950
00:48:14.039 --> 00:48:17.639
<v Speaker 3>a historical document of the world in which the way

951
00:48:17.719 --> 00:48:21.039
<v Speaker 3>the DOJ the way US attorneys thought about the dilemmas

952
00:48:21.039 --> 00:48:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that they faced, and the independence of the Department of Justice,

953
00:48:23.840 --> 00:48:26.199
<v Speaker 3>and what those worms meant. Then when you look at

954
00:48:26.239 --> 00:48:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Pam BONDI now essentially taking commands from the President of

955
00:48:30.000 --> 00:48:32.119
<v Speaker 3>the United States to go after his enemies, I mean,

956
00:48:32.280 --> 00:48:34.400
<v Speaker 3>you couldn't even imagine to step.

957
00:48:34.199 --> 00:48:37.760
<v Speaker 7>Down, have some integrity, have some pride, and just get

958
00:48:37.800 --> 00:48:40.159
<v Speaker 7>the hell out of Dodge. I don't get it. Look,

959
00:48:40.320 --> 00:48:43.360
<v Speaker 7>you know you have law firms who caved for no reason,

960
00:48:43.679 --> 00:48:45.840
<v Speaker 7>for no reason, and we're all very nice and polite

961
00:48:45.840 --> 00:48:49.480
<v Speaker 7>about it. My law firm had an executive order issued

962
00:48:49.480 --> 00:48:52.000
<v Speaker 7>against it. We went to court. Yeah, we're one of

963
00:48:52.039 --> 00:48:54.199
<v Speaker 7>four law firms Wilmer Hale. I'm very proud of that.

964
00:48:54.800 --> 00:48:57.320
<v Speaker 7>And you know, I don't mean to be overly dramatic,

965
00:48:57.400 --> 00:49:02.440
<v Speaker 7>and I'm not, but what I leave these environs one day.

966
00:49:02.639 --> 00:49:05.760
<v Speaker 7>You know, ultimately, I'm proud of the fact that I

967
00:49:05.760 --> 00:49:07.400
<v Speaker 7>didn't talk to the president. I'm proud of the fact

968
00:49:07.400 --> 00:49:10.519
<v Speaker 7>that I wanted to affirm that went to court. And

969
00:49:10.599 --> 00:49:14.079
<v Speaker 7>one like, you know, more people should want to do that.

970
00:49:14.280 --> 00:49:16.920
<v Speaker 7>More people should want to have that be the thing

971
00:49:17.159 --> 00:49:20.519
<v Speaker 7>that their associations are are known for and that their

972
00:49:20.559 --> 00:49:23.280
<v Speaker 7>own personal conduct is known for. And again I don't

973
00:49:23.320 --> 00:49:25.480
<v Speaker 7>mean to get in my high horse, but I just

974
00:49:25.559 --> 00:49:27.559
<v Speaker 7>don't get it. For a little bit of power for

975
00:49:27.599 --> 00:49:29.880
<v Speaker 7>a little bit longer, it's not worth it. Yeah.

976
00:49:29.920 --> 00:49:31.719
<v Speaker 3>And also when you think about the fact that this

977
00:49:31.800 --> 00:49:37.119
<v Speaker 3>regime will end one day and the unethical behavior, the crimes.

978
00:49:37.199 --> 00:49:39.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, as we've been saying on this podcast, Donald

979
00:49:39.320 --> 00:49:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump might have lots of criminal immunity, but you know,

980
00:49:43.199 --> 00:49:44.360
<v Speaker 3>average officials might not.

981
00:49:44.599 --> 00:49:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And so here's the case.

982
00:49:45.719 --> 00:49:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Certainly they don't have ethical immunity, and they don't have

983
00:49:47.719 --> 00:49:49.159
<v Speaker 3>immunity from Here's.

984
00:49:49.000 --> 00:49:52.760
<v Speaker 7>What they're going to say. You know, they're going to say, Look,

985
00:49:53.239 --> 00:49:55.760
<v Speaker 7>I was a tempering influence on the president. I was

986
00:49:55.800 --> 00:49:59.199
<v Speaker 7>a tempering influence in that administration. If it wasn't me,

987
00:49:59.239 --> 00:50:02.079
<v Speaker 7>it was going to be somebody wh And here, you know,

988
00:50:02.119 --> 00:50:04.960
<v Speaker 7>you don't know this, but behind the scenes, here are

989
00:50:04.960 --> 00:50:07.880
<v Speaker 7>the things that I did. I sidelined this bad guy,

990
00:50:08.639 --> 00:50:11.679
<v Speaker 7>I fired this other bad guy. I prevented this other

991
00:50:11.719 --> 00:50:15.840
<v Speaker 7>weaponized prosecution. But meanwhile, you are complicit in lots of

992
00:50:15.840 --> 00:50:18.599
<v Speaker 7>other bad stuff. And you know, I don't know that

993
00:50:18.639 --> 00:50:20.440
<v Speaker 7>I trust a person who wants to stick to their

994
00:50:20.519 --> 00:50:25.280
<v Speaker 7>job so at only to make the judgments about, you know,

995
00:50:25.320 --> 00:50:28.280
<v Speaker 7>which things were appropriate to let slide and which things

996
00:50:28.400 --> 00:50:30.239
<v Speaker 7>were good not to let slide. But that's what they're

997
00:50:30.280 --> 00:50:31.639
<v Speaker 7>all going to say when they come out. They're going

998
00:50:31.639 --> 00:50:34.360
<v Speaker 7>to launder themselves, and we should not permit them to

999
00:50:34.360 --> 00:50:34.960
<v Speaker 7>get laundered.

1000
00:50:35.400 --> 00:50:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I mean you've started answering my last question.

1001
00:50:39.079 --> 00:50:41.280
<v Speaker 3>This has been an amazing and in depth and honest

1002
00:50:41.719 --> 00:50:44.679
<v Speaker 3>conversation preed and I like the idea too that in

1003
00:50:44.719 --> 00:50:48.559
<v Speaker 3>some ways the usual professorial model of resign or not,

1004
00:50:48.719 --> 00:50:52.039
<v Speaker 3>and questions of conscience really have shifted as we're facing

1005
00:50:52.400 --> 00:50:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the threat of well, as I see a dictatorship, and

1006
00:50:55.840 --> 00:50:58.119
<v Speaker 3>the question of whether you want to be complicit in

1007
00:50:58.280 --> 00:51:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the destruction of American democracy seem looks different than the

1008
00:51:01.679 --> 00:51:05.559
<v Speaker 3>questions of conscience might have in previous presidencies. I mean,

1009
00:51:05.760 --> 00:51:08.559
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about some you know, worrying things pre and

1010
00:51:08.920 --> 00:51:10.599
<v Speaker 3>we're always looking for hope on the oath in the

1011
00:51:10.599 --> 00:51:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Office podcast. So that's my last question, I mean, where

1012
00:51:13.000 --> 00:51:13.760
<v Speaker 3>can we find it?

1013
00:51:14.920 --> 00:51:18.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, look, it's we find it where I began in

1014
00:51:18.360 --> 00:51:21.199
<v Speaker 7>talking about a few minutes ago, when I said the

1015
00:51:21.239 --> 00:51:25.199
<v Speaker 7>advent of the Donald Trump administration, particular the secondministration, I

1016
00:51:25.239 --> 00:51:26.760
<v Speaker 7>focused on one of the two things. I focused on

1017
00:51:26.800 --> 00:51:29.280
<v Speaker 7>the negative in my answer, and the negative is that

1018
00:51:29.360 --> 00:51:32.000
<v Speaker 7>you find people who have no scruples, who want to

1019
00:51:32.000 --> 00:51:33.519
<v Speaker 7>hold on to power, who want to hold on to

1020
00:51:33.639 --> 00:51:37.679
<v Speaker 7>their prestigious position or get a prestigious position. But then

1021
00:51:37.719 --> 00:51:40.760
<v Speaker 7>you do find people who are courageous and will fight

1022
00:51:40.800 --> 00:51:44.079
<v Speaker 7>against the tide in their own party. You know, Liz

1023
00:51:44.199 --> 00:51:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Cheney is one of those people. I think Marjorie Taylor

1024
00:51:47.000 --> 00:51:50.079
<v Speaker 7>Green is one of those people I think I mentioned already.

1025
00:51:50.079 --> 00:51:52.440
<v Speaker 7>I think the four law firms have fought when so

1026
00:51:52.519 --> 00:51:55.000
<v Speaker 7>many didn't and were told that they were going to

1027
00:51:55.280 --> 00:51:58.360
<v Speaker 7>perhaps cease as going concerned. The law firms have been

1028
00:51:58.360 --> 00:52:01.679
<v Speaker 7>around for decades or hundreds or hundred years. You know,

1029
00:52:01.679 --> 00:52:03.840
<v Speaker 7>they took a lot of risk and they did those things.

1030
00:52:03.880 --> 00:52:07.199
<v Speaker 7>The people of Minneapolis, who by dint of I think

1031
00:52:07.559 --> 00:52:13.239
<v Speaker 7>protesting honorably and peacefully and not giving, you know, the

1032
00:52:13.280 --> 00:52:17.519
<v Speaker 7>other side an excuse of overreaction to then be more

1033
00:52:17.599 --> 00:52:21.519
<v Speaker 7>violent and say, see, these killings you thought were unjustified

1034
00:52:21.559 --> 00:52:23.760
<v Speaker 7>were justified because we now have an unruly mob and

1035
00:52:23.800 --> 00:52:26.840
<v Speaker 7>these people are savages and they've been called worse things

1036
00:52:26.840 --> 00:52:30.400
<v Speaker 7>by President Trump. Whenever bad things happen, you see two

1037
00:52:30.480 --> 00:52:33.639
<v Speaker 7>things go on, right, You see some people who go

1038
00:52:33.679 --> 00:52:35.360
<v Speaker 7>along with it because they think that's the way to be,

1039
00:52:36.239 --> 00:52:38.480
<v Speaker 7>and you see people who defy it. And so I

1040
00:52:38.519 --> 00:52:41.320
<v Speaker 7>always draw inspiration and hope from the people who defy

1041
00:52:42.159 --> 00:52:45.599
<v Speaker 7>when it's most difficult to do so, when it's most

1042
00:52:45.599 --> 00:52:47.960
<v Speaker 7>perilous to do so. And there are lots and lots

1043
00:52:47.960 --> 00:52:50.119
<v Speaker 7>and lots of those people, and we should hold them

1044
00:52:50.199 --> 00:52:52.239
<v Speaker 7>up and hoist them up and try to find ways

1045
00:52:52.280 --> 00:52:53.119
<v Speaker 7>to join them.

1046
00:52:53.480 --> 00:52:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, ethics might look different at this moment

1047
00:52:56.079 --> 00:52:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and what the right thing to do is. But one

1048
00:52:58.000 --> 00:53:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of the things that I've gotten from this conversation, it's

1049
00:53:00.800 --> 00:53:03.840
<v Speaker 3>been such a pleasure to have this in depth conversation

1050
00:53:03.920 --> 00:53:06.280
<v Speaker 3>with you, is that you know, it's especially in the

1051
00:53:06.280 --> 00:53:08.519
<v Speaker 3>most dire times that we need to think about questions

1052
00:53:08.519 --> 00:53:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of ethics and that looking for heroes and looking for

1053
00:53:11.480 --> 00:53:13.519
<v Speaker 3>those people of virtue and so preed.

1054
00:53:13.559 --> 00:53:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us.

1055
00:53:15.119 --> 00:53:18.679
<v Speaker 7>And thanks you. Great conversation, total pleasure again, great to

1056
00:53:18.719 --> 00:53:19.039
<v Speaker 7>see you.

1057
00:53:19.400 --> 00:53:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us.

1058
00:53:20.840 --> 00:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I want to thank pree Berarra for sitting down

1059
00:53:23.400 --> 00:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with Corey.

1060
00:53:24.360 --> 00:53:25.039
<v Speaker 4>That was great.

1061
00:53:25.199 --> 00:53:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Corey, this is a guy who's been on the front

1062
00:53:27.119 --> 00:53:29.119
<v Speaker 1>line since the first year of Trump's first term, and

1063
00:53:29.159 --> 00:53:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it's so amazing to see how he is still fighting

1064
00:53:31.719 --> 00:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for the.

1065
00:53:31.960 --> 00:53:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Rule of law.

1066
00:53:33.239 --> 00:53:35.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when you and I first met, it was around

1067
00:53:35.079 --> 00:53:37.719
<v Speaker 3>the time he told the story about how he decided

1068
00:53:37.760 --> 00:53:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to refuse to resign to force Trump to fire him

1069
00:53:40.920 --> 00:53:43.519
<v Speaker 3>in order to get on the table the corruption that

1070
00:53:43.639 --> 00:53:47.079
<v Speaker 3>was at the heart really of Trump's regime, and that story,

1071
00:53:47.159 --> 00:53:47.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, is one of the.

1072
00:53:47.840 --> 00:53:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Ones that we talked about.

1073
00:53:48.880 --> 00:53:50.599
<v Speaker 3>So to get to talk to him in depth about

1074
00:53:50.599 --> 00:53:54.199
<v Speaker 3>what happened and his thoughts about Department of Justice.

1075
00:53:54.000 --> 00:53:57.000
<v Speaker 2>And dependence, and also to end on the hopeful note, to.

1076
00:53:57.000 --> 00:53:59.519
<v Speaker 3>Talk about ethics and the importance of ethics, especially in

1077
00:53:59.519 --> 00:54:03.039
<v Speaker 3>the midst of this attempted dictatorship, and finally to get

1078
00:54:03.280 --> 00:54:05.880
<v Speaker 3>his ideas about hope and that theme of the oath

1079
00:54:05.880 --> 00:54:08.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Office podcast that we always come back to

1080
00:54:08.480 --> 00:54:10.920
<v Speaker 3>that yes, it's a dark moment, but we will recover.

1081
00:54:11.360 --> 00:54:13.800
<v Speaker 3>He was an exceptional guest. We'll have him back, and

1082
00:54:13.840 --> 00:54:16.239
<v Speaker 3>what a pleasure to have him. What a pleasure of course,

1083
00:54:16.280 --> 00:54:18.440
<v Speaker 3>as always John, to speak to you every week.

1084
00:54:18.679 --> 00:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I thank you, Corey. There's no one I'd

1085
00:54:20.960 --> 00:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>rather spend multiple constitutional crises, because we're way beyond constitutional conflicts.

1086
00:54:29.039 --> 00:54:33.039
<v Speaker 1>We're in multiple juggling constitutional crises with live chainsaws. And

1087
00:54:33.599 --> 00:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I gotta say, like, really, it is the

1088
00:54:36.800 --> 00:54:40.920
<v Speaker 1>judiciary that's the primary bulwark against this overreach. I mean,

1089
00:54:40.920 --> 00:54:43.039
<v Speaker 1>God bless all the good people marching in the streets,

1090
00:54:43.079 --> 00:54:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But it ain't the press right now that's doing it.

1091
00:54:46.639 --> 00:54:50.119
<v Speaker 1>And it sure ain't Congress that's doing it. I mean,

1092
00:54:50.239 --> 00:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>these other institutions are supposed to play equal or greater roles,

1093
00:54:53.280 --> 00:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but it really is the judiciary.

1094
00:54:55.519 --> 00:54:56.079
<v Speaker 4>If you had a.

1095
00:54:56.079 --> 00:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Chance to tell everyone in America about what's at stake

1096
00:54:59.079 --> 00:55:02.840
<v Speaker 1>legally and constitutionally in these conflicts for the months ahead,

1097
00:55:03.159 --> 00:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what would it be.

1098
00:55:04.559 --> 00:55:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, John, I mean, I wish I could say that

1099
00:55:06.559 --> 00:55:08.559
<v Speaker 3>we could look at each of these conflicts, and you know,

1100
00:55:08.679 --> 00:55:12.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a question about search and seizure and ICE ignoring it.

1101
00:55:12.679 --> 00:55:16.079
<v Speaker 3>There's a question about the Tenth Amendment and ICE ignoring it.

1102
00:55:16.440 --> 00:55:18.760
<v Speaker 3>There are the questions about extortion that we talked about

1103
00:55:18.800 --> 00:55:22.480
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of the podcast, and political prosecutions that

1104
00:55:22.519 --> 00:55:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I talked about with pre But really, I think it's

1105
00:55:25.400 --> 00:55:28.159
<v Speaker 3>a mistake to just see these as isolated things. The

1106
00:55:28.159 --> 00:55:30.599
<v Speaker 3>thing that really is at stake is our democracy and

1107
00:55:30.639 --> 00:55:33.320
<v Speaker 3>the threat that the presidency, which is supposed to be

1108
00:55:33.360 --> 00:55:35.920
<v Speaker 3>bound by the rule of law, might be used to

1109
00:55:36.000 --> 00:55:39.840
<v Speaker 3>destroy democracy itself. It's something that the anti federalists worried about,

1110
00:55:39.880 --> 00:55:43.079
<v Speaker 3>that the founders were aware of, and wow, it really

1111
00:55:43.159 --> 00:55:45.360
<v Speaker 3>might happen. And I don't want to hide from that.

1112
00:55:45.360 --> 00:55:47.599
<v Speaker 3>That's what we're showing every week. But I also don't

1113
00:55:47.599 --> 00:55:49.719
<v Speaker 3>want to hide the hope because we are fighting back,

1114
00:55:49.760 --> 00:55:52.400
<v Speaker 3>and I do think that in the end, the fact

1115
00:55:52.440 --> 00:55:55.119
<v Speaker 3>that we're fighting that there is a constitutional crisis, that

1116
00:55:55.159 --> 00:55:57.519
<v Speaker 3>we haven't given up, that there's a crisis at all,

1117
00:55:57.639 --> 00:56:00.519
<v Speaker 3>not subjugation, that that's where the hope comes from.

1118
00:56:00.760 --> 00:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to just thank you Corey for just

1119
00:56:03.480 --> 00:56:06.760
<v Speaker 1>helping us navigate this extraordinary moment where legal norms and

1120
00:56:06.800 --> 00:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>constitutional order and political power are intersecting in ways that

1121
00:56:10.519 --> 00:56:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Civics class it didn't prepare us.

1122
00:56:12.360 --> 00:56:14.719
<v Speaker 4>And thank you for knowing all the bad bunny lyrics too.

1123
00:56:15.159 --> 00:56:17.159
<v Speaker 1>What is the best way for our listeners to follow you,

1124
00:56:17.199 --> 00:56:19.079
<v Speaker 1>professor and keep up with your work the other six

1125
00:56:19.159 --> 00:56:19.760
<v Speaker 1>days of the week.

1126
00:56:20.239 --> 00:56:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have a great newsletter on substack, so subscribe there.

1127
00:56:24.119 --> 00:56:27.199
<v Speaker 3>You can listen to us on any of the places

1128
00:56:27.239 --> 00:56:30.119
<v Speaker 3>that you get podcasts, and I urge you to continue

1129
00:56:30.159 --> 00:56:33.559
<v Speaker 3>to leave reviews. We've got almost all five star reviews

1130
00:56:33.639 --> 00:56:36.840
<v Speaker 3>on the various platforms. On Spotify, we have more than

1131
00:56:36.880 --> 00:56:40.400
<v Speaker 3>five hundred and twenty on Apple, and of course we

1132
00:56:40.480 --> 00:56:42.320
<v Speaker 3>continue to be in that top five.

1133
00:56:42.400 --> 00:56:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We were four last week.

1134
00:56:44.079 --> 00:56:48.320
<v Speaker 3>We continue to climb on Apple Government Podcasts and continue

1135
00:56:48.320 --> 00:56:50.760
<v Speaker 3>to tell people about it. The reason we're growing is

1136
00:56:51.039 --> 00:56:53.679
<v Speaker 3>we don't have a huge advertising budget. We do some

1137
00:56:54.199 --> 00:56:57.400
<v Speaker 3>sharing of ads, but it's really people telling their friends,

1138
00:56:57.440 --> 00:56:58.280
<v Speaker 3>so keep doing that.

1139
00:56:58.480 --> 00:56:59.519
<v Speaker 2>We like this podcast.

1140
00:56:59.559 --> 00:57:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Tell your friend to listen and become aware of what's

1141
00:57:02.039 --> 00:57:04.079
<v Speaker 3>happening in this democracy and the threat to it.

1142
00:57:04.519 --> 00:57:04.840
<v Speaker 7>Right on.

1143
00:57:05.079 --> 00:57:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Wendy and Beowulf and everyone helps

1144
00:57:07.639 --> 00:57:09.440
<v Speaker 1>us put the show together. I want to thank all

1145
00:57:09.480 --> 00:57:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners are being so brilliant and so deeply attractive,

1146
00:57:12.559 --> 00:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and most of all, I want to thank you Corey

1147
00:57:14.519 --> 00:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for making me feel a little bit smarter, a little

1148
00:57:16.920 --> 00:57:19.599
<v Speaker 1>bit braver every week. You can hear me every night

1149
00:57:19.679 --> 00:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on Serious XM Progress Channel one twenty seven. If you

1150
00:57:22.840 --> 00:57:25.239
<v Speaker 1>don't have Serious XM, we're a free podcast called the

1151
00:57:25.280 --> 00:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>John Fiegelsang Podcast. I have a substack too, and my

1152
00:57:28.320 --> 00:57:30.559
<v Speaker 1>book is called Separation of Church and Hate, A sane

1153
00:57:30.559 --> 00:57:32.119
<v Speaker 1>person's guide to take it back to the Bible from

1154
00:57:32.199 --> 00:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentalist fascists and block pleasing a prauge, Corey, I feel

1155
00:57:36.519 --> 00:57:40.199
<v Speaker 1>better about my crumbling democracy already. Thank you, and we'll

1156
00:57:40.199 --> 00:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>see you guys next time on the Oath in the Office.
