Speaker 1: No bed of fir Nod.
Speaker 2: Hello, and welcome to the show. This is the Cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy. And my name is Jonathan, I'm Jacob. And
Speaker 2: there was obviously some things that happened over the past
Speaker 2: give or take a week, obviously with the passing of
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk and everything, and there's a lot of people
Speaker 2: that are up in arms. Everybody's opinionated about the whole thing.
Speaker 2: The extremes on both ends are firing on all cylinders,
Speaker 2: and you know, there's people out there. Maybe he isn't dead,
Speaker 2: maybe he is dead. Well, if he is dead, who
Speaker 2: killed him and who stood to benefit from all of it.
Speaker 2: But while we were all concerned with this whole Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk thing, not to brush him aside. I mean, rest
Speaker 2: in peace. He was a great guy, whether you think
Speaker 2: that he was or not. He had a family, he
Speaker 2: had kids, He was a young man and his family
Speaker 2: was there to, you know, watch his assassination, which I
Speaker 2: don't care who you are, nobody deserves that. He did
Speaker 2: not deserve a public execution. There are far more deserving
Speaker 2: people than Charlie Kirk. I don't care who you are,
Speaker 2: what you believe. There are far more deserving people. That
Speaker 2: being said, there were some things that happened while all
Speaker 2: of our attention and focus was on this Charlie Kirk thing.
Speaker 1: Jacob, where do we get started? So let's dive into it.
Speaker 3: I do need to give the disclaimer now, good cult
Speaker 3: members out there listening, this is.
Speaker 1: Going to be an ugly episode.
Speaker 3: We are going to be talking about some very disgusting
Speaker 3: adult themes. If you do have for some reason, if
Speaker 3: you listen to us on speaker with young children in
Speaker 3: the room, first of all, stop that. Secondly, this is
Speaker 3: not the episode to do that with. We are gonna
Speaker 3: be talking about some very serious child predator activities. We
Speaker 3: are gonna be talking about Epstein, we are gonna be
Speaker 3: talking about some political figures. We're gonna be talking about
Speaker 3: all these things. And here's the reason why September tenth,
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk gets capped disgustingly on public access all the things.
Speaker 3: Everybody has now shifted their focus to this town in Utah, which,
Speaker 3: for the record, let's not negate the fact that the shooter,
Speaker 3: alleged shooter was Mormon.
Speaker 1: But okay, okay, not saying that all Mountain Jews.
Speaker 3: Are assassins either, But like hear me out, everybody's focus
Speaker 3: goes to Utah.
Speaker 1: In Washington, d C.
Speaker 3: There was a vote that was being voted upon to
Speaker 3: release the rest of the Epstein files, and only four
Speaker 3: Republicans voted yes. All other Republicans voted no to keep
Speaker 3: it quiet. Now, there was a lot of Democrats that
Speaker 3: voted yes, we need to release these files. People are
Speaker 3: not talking about this at this moment. They're talking about
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk. But I think that we do need to
Speaker 3: circle back to this because there's always some sleight of hand,
Speaker 3: there is always some cataclysmic event.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying that Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3: Was killed as a way to get people's attention away
Speaker 3: from DC. I'm saying that they are using it anyway
Speaker 3: to get people's attention away from DC. Maybe there was
Speaker 3: a connection there, maybe there wasn't.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I can't speculate on that at this moment. I'm saying
Speaker 3: that this is the look over here, not over here,
Speaker 3: that we have seen done time and time and time again.
Speaker 1: All right, same thing with.
Speaker 2: It's very very convenient timing that this is going on
Speaker 2: because and if you remember in it, it's not really
Speaker 2: that far fetched to think that they're using this as
Speaker 2: some kind of veil to hide under, because the last
Speaker 2: time that any of this came to any courtroom, the
Speaker 2: last time that all this Epstein stuff started really becoming
Speaker 2: super mainstream, Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself all the memes
Speaker 2: that were going around the last time they did that,
Speaker 2: there just so happened to be a little sickness that
Speaker 2: went around the entire world. So convenient timing where you
Speaker 2: get something crazy, where you get literally everybody, whether you
Speaker 2: love Charlie Kirk, you hate Charlie Kirk, maybe you heard
Speaker 2: of Charlie Kirk. Everybody if even if you didn't know
Speaker 2: who Charlie Kirk was, now you do because it's so polarizing.
Speaker 1: Yep, it's the same.
Speaker 3: Like you said, I'm not saying that COVID was to
Speaker 3: get people not talking about Epstein. I'm saying that it
Speaker 3: just so happened to line up and they ran with it,
Speaker 3: and he got people off of the topic. Cut two
Speaker 3: or cut back in time nine to eleven. Right, just
Speaker 3: a few days prior, Rumsfeld came out our Secretary of
Speaker 3: Defense at the time and said that we are trillions
Speaker 3: of dollars and we just don't know what happened, wamp
Speaker 3: Want and they were doing a investigation into what happened.
Speaker 3: Next thing, you know, a couple days later, the Pentagon
Speaker 3: gets hit. The World Towers are, the World Trade Center
Speaker 3: towers fall, Building seven, Building six, all.
Speaker 1: These things are we are we still talking about the
Speaker 1: death that sit in the defense budget. We just got attacked.
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, nobody, I, like I said in that Charlie Kirk episode,
Speaker 2: like September eleventh, was an afterthought because everybody was concerned
Speaker 2: about Charlie Kirk, right.
Speaker 1: Exactly exactly this one killing.
Speaker 3: Yes, very public, Yes, a guy it couldn't it couldn't
Speaker 3: happened to a better guy.
Speaker 1: All the things, yes, yes, yes, But that's my point.
Speaker 3: The public zeitgeist, right, the public mindset, the mainstream media is,
Speaker 3: and the not so mainstream media is, the social media is.
Speaker 3: Everything has now shifted towards Charlie Kirk. Rather than the
Speaker 3: fact that they just tried to vote to release every
Speaker 3: bit of the Epstein files, and there was a very
Speaker 3: very hard disparagy on who voted for what. Now this
Speaker 3: being said, here's a conspiratorial theory for you, all Right.
Speaker 3: I have been very open about me being a conservative
Speaker 3: minded person, right, I make no apologies about this, And
Speaker 3: for anybody out there that is a you know, just
Speaker 3: left of center considering yourself a Democrat or something like this,
Speaker 3: I have no beef with you, and please do not
Speaker 3: take this episode as a personal attack against you. The
Speaker 3: same way that there are Republicans that we are going
Speaker 3: to talk about in this episode. They are disgusting human
Speaker 3: beings that need to be fried alive, Okay, and I'm
Speaker 3: not trying to be an apologist for them either, Okay.
Speaker 3: This being said, for the votes to be cast with
Speaker 3: this type of hard line, to where all the Democrats
Speaker 3: voted to release the files and only four Republicans out
Speaker 3: of all of them, that's not a good look.
Speaker 1: But I think that that's the point. Let me break
Speaker 1: this down.
Speaker 3: The Democrat Party as a whole understands that they have
Speaker 3: no gas in the fucking tank. Dude, They got no
Speaker 3: rounds in the chamber on anything.
Speaker 1: Of note. What I mean by this is realistically, Jonathan, can.
Speaker 3: You name three people that they actually could run for
Speaker 3: the Democratic nominee for the next presidency.
Speaker 1: That are actually worth the fuck?
Speaker 3: Not just a Democrat name that you know that like,
Speaker 3: you know everybody's gonna say, oh, Gavin Newsom, Right, that's
Speaker 3: one I've heard that much, which I thought.
Speaker 2: Was really strange. You bring up that name too. Gavin
Speaker 2: Newsom recently made an appearance on The Sean Ryan Show. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm like, Sean, what the fuck are you doing?
Speaker 1: Dude? Did you see the episode? No?
Speaker 3: I just saw clips of it. It does not put
Speaker 3: Gavin in a positive light.
Speaker 2: I'll say, at least that's good. Maybe I should do
Speaker 2: a little bit more research. Not to judge, you know,
Speaker 2: just on the on the surface. I just thought, man
Speaker 2: would who in their right mind would want to give
Speaker 2: this guy a voice? But I do understand maybe if
Speaker 2: you're trying to, you know, put him in a corner,
Speaker 2: make him ask questions he doesn't have, you know, the
Speaker 2: paparazzi or screen cutting and commercials and all that shit.
Speaker 3: I get it, Okay, he put his own foot in
Speaker 3: his mouth. Sean wasn't even trying to spin it one
Speaker 3: way or another. He's just having an interview. He's just
Speaker 3: having a conversation with a guy who is a very
Speaker 3: well known guy.
Speaker 1: He's doing it for the content. I get that.
Speaker 3: But Gavin is so fucking stupid and so full of
Speaker 3: his own shit that he could not help himself but
Speaker 3: to shove both feet into his own mouth consistently, and Sean.
Speaker 1: Went even like trying to trip them up.
Speaker 3: He's just like, okay, so tell me about this other
Speaker 3: thing here, and then Gavin just went back into it.
Speaker 3: It's like, all right, dope, cool, but anyway, okay, side
Speaker 3: stepping that. So Gavin Newsom is a option, but he's
Speaker 3: not very well liked by anyone, right He quote unquote
Speaker 3: well spoken.
Speaker 1: But that's about it.
Speaker 2: I can tell you who it is, and and this
Speaker 2: name is not being thrown around. It has been thrown
Speaker 2: around in the past. But I think that they did
Speaker 2: not run this individual because they knew that there was
Speaker 2: way too much momentum on Trump's side. So they wanted
Speaker 2: to throw up, you know, a sacrificial goat named Kamala,
Speaker 2: and because everybody knew, I mean, she didn't have two
Speaker 2: brain cells to rub together. So let's just throw her
Speaker 2: up there. You know, every everybody will expose her for
Speaker 2: who she is. She's not gonna win. We don't have
Speaker 2: a chance. We want to save our you know, our
Speaker 2: our ace of spades. We want to keep that bad
Speaker 2: boy up our sleeve for whenever it's really time. And
Speaker 2: I think that that ace of spades is Big mic
Speaker 2: I think that's Michelle Obama.
Speaker 3: Very well, could be, very well, could be, especially now
Speaker 3: that all the shit with Brigitte Macrons come out and
Speaker 3: all of these things. Maybe she'll, maybe Michelle aka Big Mike,
Speaker 3: will finally come out as being a trans and that would,
Speaker 3: like she thinks, help her.
Speaker 1: Standing in the votes or something.
Speaker 3: I don't know, but my point is they really don't
Speaker 3: have anybody that is universally well liked. There are some
Speaker 3: Republicans out there that are universally well liked. Democrats have
Speaker 3: nothing because for the entire Democrat Party to get to
Speaker 3: a position they're currently at, they have to have it
Speaker 3: sided with the screaming left, ultra woke, ultra stupid, the
Speaker 3: Antifa crowd to get to that position. And it's to
Speaker 3: a point now where it's like it's not even a
Speaker 3: conversational you know whatever, that they are psychotic.
Speaker 1: It's understood that they are psychopaths.
Speaker 2: There's something that I've really been I've been trying to
Speaker 2: put a lot of thought into this, this whole Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk thing. Who stood to benefit most. Let's just say
Speaker 2: that it was some kind of grand scheme, which I
Speaker 2: don't believe in coincidences. I believe that there is always
Speaker 2: five D chess playing in the background, and they give
Speaker 2: us the three D right, that's the only thing they
Speaker 2: give us. But what's really going on? Because I'm somebody,
Speaker 2: I absolutely believe that his assassination was one hundred percent orchestrated.
Speaker 2: There is no if ann's or butts about it.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 2: I know what you're gonna say, Well, he's just a
Speaker 2: political analyst. He's just a guy. He's not even somebody
Speaker 2: that is in the House, that is in the Senate.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. The people that are the main talking
Speaker 2: heads of the world are the social media influencers. We
Speaker 2: have to understand that those are the voices that are
Speaker 2: being heard. Who is who is is Gavin Newsen? Is
Speaker 2: Gavin Newsom getting five million views for each video?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 2: Joe Rogan is? Is is Nancy fucking you know tig
Speaker 2: Old Bitty's Is she getting three million views for something
Speaker 2: that she says on the on the TV? No, it's
Speaker 2: the social media influencers, the people that have the most
Speaker 2: amount of eyes on it. So I do believe that
Speaker 2: it was it had to have been a political assassination.
Speaker 2: Now I started to think about this and if you remember, yeah,
Speaker 2: there was a little bit of steam behind Trump, you know,
Speaker 2: before he got elected, there was a little bit of
Speaker 2: steam behind him obviously, like the Trump train was running strong,
Speaker 2: but it was also running strong into twenty twenty. And
Speaker 2: whether you think the election was stolen back then or not,
Speaker 2: he didn't end up getting it right. But if you remember,
Speaker 2: the thing that pushed Trump over the edge was the
Speaker 2: shot heard round the world whenever he got shot in
Speaker 2: the year, right, everybody, And that was in the summer,
Speaker 2: that was just a few months before you know, the
Speaker 2: election would would come and and you saw the news
Speaker 2: trying to sweep it under the rug. And then of
Speaker 2: course you got all the crazy whack jobs that were
Speaker 2: going to his rallies wearing the little fucking ear patch
Speaker 2: and everything. It it it energizes the extremists. I think
Speaker 2: anytime something like this happens, it always energizes the extremists.
Speaker 2: The top one percent on either end of the polar
Speaker 2: of the of the pole of the because it is
Speaker 2: a polarity, those are the ones that speak up for,
Speaker 2: you know, the the other ninety eight percent in the middle.
Speaker 2: That being said, it helped him big time. And now
Speaker 2: and now what you have is there's there's going to
Speaker 2: be the midterm elections that are they're gonna be coming
Speaker 2: up right, and and then also you have the all
Speaker 2: the the Epstein shit that is getting thrown under the
Speaker 2: rug and everything else that is happening behind closed doors.
Speaker 2: Could this be some kind of energetic push almost like
Speaker 2: not even to get woo woo or any I'm not
Speaker 2: going there. What I'm saying, No, I hear you.
Speaker 3: You're talking about the more or less the spirit of
Speaker 3: the culture of America in this moment.
Speaker 1: I'm with you one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: Yes, And I think that it's just strange timing that
Speaker 2: all of that happened. And now who does that help
Speaker 2: the most? Because if we're playing five D chess here,
Speaker 2: who does it help the most? I don't believe that
Speaker 2: it helps the Democrats one bit.
Speaker 3: It doesn't because now say that it likes they're killing
Speaker 3: the Republican talking heads.
Speaker 1: These Democrats are psychotic, and that's that's I'm with you.
Speaker 3: If anything, it makes the left as a whole look
Speaker 3: even worse.
Speaker 2: Right, And I think that a martyr speaks volumes, And
Speaker 2: I think that a martyr energizes a certain political side.
Speaker 2: And I'm not saying that the Republicans did this. They
Speaker 2: very they very well may have. And whoever is paying them,
Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm not even.
Speaker 1: Gonna say that it has to be Israel. I don't know.
Speaker 1: All I'm saying is is that's what he said.
Speaker 2: Whether he was some kind of fucking profit and was
Speaker 2: able to look into some kind of crystal ball, and
Speaker 2: he knew before he was assassinated that he was going
Speaker 2: to be assassinated by a certain country. That's besides the point.
Speaker 1: What if your boy was Antifa?
Speaker 2: Why would but why would what is Soros and the
Speaker 2: Open Society Foundation have to gain from Charlie Kirk being dead?
Speaker 3: Like you said, the talking heads are the ones that
Speaker 3: are the real movers and shakers these days, right, And
Speaker 3: there was there's only a few within the conversation of
Speaker 3: the most prolific conservative talking hits as of this moment,
Speaker 3: right and even a week ago, there's only possibly four
Speaker 3: or five that you can really say were like the
Speaker 3: big dogs speaking on behalf of the conservative side of
Speaker 3: the conversation. Ben Shapiro's one of them. Charlie Kirk, Candice Owen,
Speaker 3: these are like the big dogs, right. None of them
Speaker 3: have any aspirations of joining in on the political frame.
Speaker 3: None of them want to be put up for election,
Speaker 3: none of them want to be voted into office. They
Speaker 3: are very very comfortable at doing their job of just
Speaker 3: talking about this shit right right.
Speaker 2: Well, and also think about it, and I know a
Speaker 2: lot of people that are doing this, and you can
Speaker 2: look at the algorithm. There are more people now that
Speaker 2: are watching Charlie Kirk videos than there were before his death.
Speaker 2: That is a fact, That is an absolute fact. Because
Speaker 2: even the people that were curious about what he was
Speaker 2: saying that why is he so polarizing? Those people are
Speaker 2: watching it. It is on the algorithm. Every single content
Speaker 2: creator out there, every single video, every single TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, whatever, YouTube,
Speaker 2: it all is Charlie Kirk. There are so many eyes
Speaker 2: on Charlie Kirk right now. And if you think about it,
Speaker 2: if we are playing, if they are playing five D chess,
Speaker 2: his words are being cemented, whether you agree with them
Speaker 2: or not exactly and could that be for a reason.
Speaker 3: You are hitting the nail on the fucking head right now?
Speaker 3: Here's the deal. Name one algorithm that is talking about
Speaker 3: anything other than Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna find it.
Speaker 3: Maybe in some international news, but even still, I've got
Speaker 3: homeboys in South Africa that are reaching out to me
Speaker 3: and asking me about Charlie Kirk. South African algorithms are
Speaker 3: talking about an American conservative talking head who is thirty
Speaker 3: one years old.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying that he was a nobody.
Speaker 3: My point is, even internationally, people are paying attention to
Speaker 3: this over what's going on in their backyard right now.
Speaker 1: Oh dude, that's my point.
Speaker 2: In Australia, in Europe, I mean literally all over the place,
Speaker 2: it's all anybody's talking about. And so I cannot There's
Speaker 2: no way that they didn't wargame this outcome, There's no way.
Speaker 1: That's my point though.
Speaker 3: Right South Africa, as a snapshot, they have a genocide
Speaker 3: going on there right now, but their news is talking
Speaker 3: about Charlie Kirk because it's look over here, not over there.
Speaker 3: American government is using it for the same principle percent
Speaker 3: you don't let a good casualty go to waste.
Speaker 1: Bro never let a good cataclysm go to waste.
Speaker 3: Man, what are we talking about here, whether it was
Speaker 3: a hurricane that fucked up an entire city, forest fires,
Speaker 3: a tsunami.
Speaker 1: Look, we gotta talk about it.
Speaker 3: We have to because that keeps people away from what's
Speaker 3: going on in DC. What is going on in DC now,
Speaker 3: what is going on with all these other big around
Speaker 3: the world, but specifically in our backyard in Washington, DC. See,
Speaker 3: some very very dirty things are taking place right now.
Speaker 1: Okay, so what day.
Speaker 2: So you're saying that on the day of Charlie Kirk's death,
Speaker 2: they the day was the day timber fucking tenth dog,
Speaker 2: the day that they went and voted on this in
Speaker 2: the in the house. Yeah, Okay, that's strange because I
Speaker 2: mean that literally couldn't played out any better for them.
Speaker 2: That was the best case scenario. I mean, Hurricane Katrina
Speaker 2: doesn't have I mean, there's a lot of lives lost
Speaker 2: in Katrina. Everybody was talking about it. But in this
Speaker 2: day and age of social media, information is flying by
Speaker 2: the second. It is way more powerful now than it
Speaker 2: was back then, right yep. And and so it's interesting.
Speaker 2: And then you add in the fact that that book,
Speaker 2: you know, The Killing Charlie Kirk, which was released on
Speaker 2: September ninth, somebody knew about it. Somebody knew that this
Speaker 2: was going to happen, and this was very very peculiar timing.
Speaker 3: Let's see, this is my point. The timing is very
Speaker 3: very peculiar. I agree with you.
Speaker 1: But now, why are.
Speaker 3: The Democrats taking the stance that they are taking on this.
Speaker 3: This is the thing that's been cooking my brain. While
Speaker 3: everybody is going on and on and on about Charlie
Speaker 3: Kirk and yes with you one hundred percent, all the things,
Speaker 3: the Democrats are currently trying to take a stand of morality.
Speaker 3: They're trying to get up on their moral high horse
Speaker 3: right now to say, look, we want justice to be
Speaker 3: served for the victims of Epstein. It's Trump and his
Speaker 3: administration and these conservatives that are trying to make it
Speaker 3: to where these women will never see their justice and
Speaker 3: all these things.
Speaker 1: Now that being.
Speaker 3: Said, I find it strange that the Democrats are realistically
Speaker 3: trying to take a side of morality when objective morality
Speaker 3: has been something that they have been trying to sideline
Speaker 3: for decades now.
Speaker 1: It's all been about subjective morality.
Speaker 3: It's all about what feels right to you, not what
Speaker 3: is right for the population. Okay, that's it's crazy that
Speaker 3: they are currently trying to do a phase shift and
Speaker 3: they're using this cataclysm as a way to sideline what
Speaker 3: is going down.
Speaker 1: So let's talk about what's going down. Let's do it,
Speaker 1: all right, I'm gonna go ahead and share the screen
Speaker 1: at this time.
Speaker 3: We got some articles, I got a video we're gonna play,
Speaker 3: we got some things were getting into For anybody that
Speaker 3: would like to see what we are talking about rather
Speaker 3: than just hear about a Jonathan, where can they go?
Speaker 2: I guess in the one of the previous episodes, I
Speaker 2: kept on saying, go to PayPal dot com slash Cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy Podcast. Uh no, don't do that. Go to
Speaker 2: patreon dot com slash Cult of Conspiracy Podcast. That link
Speaker 2: is down the show notes below. We appreciate all the
Speaker 2: good cult members with that third eye all the way
Speaker 2: open that want that news that is too hot for YouTube. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's the best place to be able to support us.
Speaker 2: If you go over there, the uh, you'll be able
Speaker 2: to slide into our dms. Maybe you have a suggestion
Speaker 2: for a show, Maybe you just want to reach out
Speaker 2: and say hi. We answer all of them on the daily.
Speaker 2: If you want the shows a couple of days in advance.
Speaker 2: You'll be able to have it over there if you
Speaker 2: want to be able to see video. It's the only
Speaker 2: place where video is being served at. And also the
Speaker 2: biggest thing is that it is completely commercial. Yeah, no
Speaker 2: more commercials. Get out of here with all of that. So,
Speaker 2: like we said, we make a living off of the ads.
Speaker 2: That is who pays us. That's why we're able to
Speaker 2: put the shows out for free on Spotify, on Apple
Speaker 2: podcasts and everywhere else. But we have to, you know,
Speaker 2: we do this for a living. I mean sometimes sometimes
Speaker 2: you gotta do it a little bit dirty like that.
Speaker 2: It's not necessarily dirty, it's just the way that it is.
Speaker 2: I mean, you're not going to be able to go
Speaker 2: on Netflix, YouTube, the the Internet anything without seeing some ads.
Speaker 1: It's just the world we live in.
Speaker 2: But if that sickens you and you are so damn
Speaker 2: tired of you know, skipping fifteen seconds or skipping thirty
Speaker 2: seconds or whatever on your phone during the middle of
Speaker 2: a podcast maybe you're driving, you're like, oh my god,
Speaker 2: I gotta do this so often.
Speaker 1: You don't have to do that anymore.
Speaker 2: If you go over to patreon dot com slash Cult
Speaker 2: of Conspiracy Podcasts, we also have a third eye all
Speaker 2: the way open tier over there, and if you sign
Speaker 2: up for that, you get everything that we just mentioned,
Speaker 2: plus you'll be able to join us every Tuesday night
Speaker 2: at nine pm Central for the Cult Member Live Show.
Speaker 1: And if you've listened to those oh.
Speaker 2: Man, I mean, that is where the community comes together
Speaker 2: and conversates. That is where the community comes together and
Speaker 2: we throw out our opinions, We throw out our hypothesis hypotheses,
Speaker 2: and we throw out our own individual conspiracies that want
Speaker 2: to be talked about with the rest of the good
Speaker 2: Cult members. If you want to have a voice, and
Speaker 2: not a lot of people do, this is the place
Speaker 2: where you can have a voice and you can insert
Speaker 2: your two cents. Maybe you caught something that nobody else
Speaker 2: did that is extremely important. That's why we do it
Speaker 2: every Tuesday night.
Speaker 3: Hell yeah, all right, now, let's get into it. This
Speaker 3: is from NBC News. Senate Republicans defeat Chuck Schumer's push
Speaker 3: to force the release of Epstein's files. The GOP tabled
Speaker 3: Schumer's amendment, but Republicans Ran Paul and Josh Hawley joined
Speaker 3: Democrats in voting in favor of releasing all the records.
Speaker 2: Love and Josh Holly. We've covered both of them. Josh Holly,
Speaker 2: I believe, is a younger individual Ran Paul. He's been
Speaker 2: doing it because what's his dad's name again?
Speaker 1: Uh damn it, Ron Paul. Yeah, yeah, yeah, dude, the Paul's.
Speaker 2: They're never going to get elected, unfortunately, but they honestly,
Speaker 2: in my opinion, they would be the best representation of
Speaker 2: the country. They care more about the people than almost
Speaker 2: anybody else. And I know some people think that they're
Speaker 2: a little off, they're a little crazy. If you listen
Speaker 2: to their talking points. They want people first and not
Speaker 2: American politics first. So Josh Holly two, we've covered him
Speaker 2: a lot, fucking fascinating individual.
Speaker 1: Indeed, all right, now, let's get into.
Speaker 2: It, all right. So this is via wah Ishington. The
Speaker 2: Republican led Senate narrowly voted Wednesday to defeat an amendment
Speaker 2: introduced by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer out of New
Speaker 2: York to compel the Justice Department to release all of
Speaker 2: the Jeffrey Epstein files. Hilarious that Chuck Schumer would do that,
Speaker 2: But I gotta be honest, dude, Chuck Schumer. I don't
Speaker 2: like him, but he's he has, He's introduced a lot
Speaker 2: of the releasing of the UFO footage. Shoot, he's been
Speaker 2: on that side too, So I just want to throw
Speaker 2: that out there. Not everybody is one hundred percent fucked,
Speaker 2: you know. I mean, maybe there's something gained, But I'm
Speaker 2: just I don't know.
Speaker 3: I think that, like you said, it's seventy chess to
Speaker 3: I think that him even talking about releasing those files
Speaker 3: benefits him in some way. But that's a conversation for
Speaker 3: another talk.
Speaker 2: But yeah, the vote was fifty one to forty nine
Speaker 2: in favor of tabling the amendment. Two Republicans Ran Paul
Speaker 2: of Kentucky and Josh Holly of Missouri joined all forty
Speaker 2: seven Democrats in voting against tabling the amendment. Interesting that
Speaker 2: there was forty seven Democrats president forty seven. You know,
Speaker 2: my position has long been long been I think we
Speaker 2: ought to release those files and trust the American people,
Speaker 2: Holly told reporters, just like we did with the MLK
Speaker 2: files and the JFK files.
Speaker 3: And even that being said, the MLK files and JFK
Speaker 3: files that they did release heavily redacted didn't actually tell
Speaker 3: us any new information that we didn't already know, and
Speaker 3: people are still convinced that they are holding information from
Speaker 3: us just gonna throw it out there. It's not like
Speaker 3: that was like a big win, like they tried to
Speaker 3: make it.
Speaker 1: Out to be.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, it didn't really get a whole lot of
Speaker 2: steam behind it because it's old, you know. And that's
Speaker 2: that's the magic, is that they wait sixty or fucking
Speaker 2: seventy years to release this kind of shit. By the way,
Speaker 2: the same thing that they're doing with all the findings
Speaker 2: from the COVID vaccine. Did you know that, Like, they're
Speaker 2: not releasing that for another fifty or sixty seventy years.
Speaker 2: They've already said that that was the plan.
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's a rinsom repeat.
Speaker 3: They're doing it until all the guilty parties are dead
Speaker 3: and then they'll release it and let everybody know what happened.
Speaker 1: It's the same with like the Tuskegee.
Speaker 3: Experiments, when they gave the black population of Tuskegee syphilis
Speaker 3: just to do it for no reason. There was no
Speaker 3: scientific research being done. They were just doing it just
Speaker 3: to see what the fuck would happen. They didn't release
Speaker 3: that information until the early two thousands, after everybody that
Speaker 3: was involved with it was dead. That's how this goes, Yeah,
Speaker 3: all the time, and a surprise move. Earlier Wednesday, Schumer
Speaker 3: had used a procedural tactic to force a floor vote
Speaker 3: on the Epstein files. He pitched an amendment to the
Speaker 3: sweeping defense policy being debated by the Senate. His amendment
Speaker 3: mirrored the language of bipartisan legislation from Representatives Thomas Massey
Speaker 3: out of Kentucky and Roe Kanna out of California, who
Speaker 3: vowed to force a similar vote in the House. There
Speaker 3: has been so much lying, obfuscation, that's a tough word.
Speaker 2: Cover ups. The American people need to see everything that's
Speaker 2: in the Epstein file, and my amendment would make that happen.
Speaker 2: Schumer said, I thought there was no file, you know.
Speaker 3: What I mean, Like there was no file, even though
Speaker 3: Pam Bondi said there was like ten thousand files and
Speaker 3: hours and all of these things.
Speaker 1: They were literally on her desk, on her desk right.
Speaker 3: Now, and then later on another No, they're not those
Speaker 3: big binders that all of them walked out of the
Speaker 3: White House holding like we're going to release them. They
Speaker 3: were all empty, and we could see that from a
Speaker 3: side view of it. These giant three inch three ring
Speaker 3: binders were empty, but it was just for the show,
Speaker 3: just for the lights, camera action of it. All right, okay,
Speaker 3: and now all of a sudden, he's saying that we
Speaker 3: need to release all of these files right now, and
Speaker 3: it just got shut down.
Speaker 2: Nothing can stop what is coming, they say.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, except for oh, well, like we have a
Speaker 3: one minute missing from the prison video because every night
Speaker 3: at that time, the camera would shut off for a minute.
Speaker 3: And that's been that way for years. It's been documented this, this,
Speaker 3: and this, oh wait a minute. Two weeks ago they
Speaker 3: found the missing minute. So all of what you said
Speaker 3: about the camera doing it and all these that was
Speaker 3: all a lie. So this is like lie number forty
Speaker 3: eight that we've caught you in in the past two months.
Speaker 2: But all right, look, the bottom line is the American
Speaker 2: people need to see this. Donald Trump has lied about this,
Speaker 2: he continued. There has been so many lies, so much prevarication,
Speaker 2: so much cover up. The American people, Democrats, independents, Republicans
Speaker 2: are demanding it be made public, and it should be.
Speaker 2: We hope Republicans will vote for it. They should. Wednesday
Speaker 2: evenings vote was significant because Senate Republicans have largely avoided
Speaker 2: discussing we're voting on the issue of the Epstein files.
Speaker 2: Now all Senators have been put on record on the matter.
Speaker 2: Both Holly and Paul have been thorns in the White
Speaker 2: House's side at different points in this year. Hally this
Speaker 2: summer triggered an uproar and among fellow Republicans and from
Speaker 2: Trump himself when he voted to voted with the Democrats
Speaker 2: to advance a bill to ban members of Congress, the President,
Speaker 2: and the Vice president from trading stocks, which should.
Speaker 1: Be no fucking roll.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, I agree that's a good thing, but
Speaker 3: also that's not gonna go over well, that's literally, uh,
Speaker 3: you know, insider trading is how these political figures have
Speaker 3: made their money. You're getting in the way of your
Speaker 3: colleague's bottom dollar.
Speaker 2: But all right, it's like who audits the irs? You
Speaker 2: know what I'm saying, it's the irs. The audits the irs.
Speaker 2: And this is the same thing. You're asking for something
Speaker 2: to be changed by the people that have done it.
Speaker 2: Like that's asking a robber to go and rob himself.
Speaker 1: He's not gonna do it, and.
Speaker 3: Then try to rat on all of his homies that
Speaker 3: are also robbers to get them in trouble. But he's
Speaker 3: good now because he's changed and all. It's like, bro,
Speaker 3: that's how you get killed. That's not how this goes.
Speaker 1: This is the real world. This s ain't fucking movies.
Speaker 2: He also was sharply critical of the Medicaid cuts and
Speaker 2: Trump's uh in Trump's legislator signature legislation, the One Big
Speaker 2: Beautiful Bill, and proposed legislation to reverse the cuts after
Speaker 2: he voted to pass the bill. Five people familiar with
Speaker 2: the discussions told NBC News last month that in both
Speaker 2: Congress and the White House, Holly is thought of as
Speaker 2: readying himself for a twenty twenty eight presidential bid.
Speaker 3: Good he should, okay, Paul, See, there's different levels and
Speaker 3: fuckery of foot here.
Speaker 1: That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 2: Paul, meanwhile, has argued against Trump's wide ranging tariff agenda
Speaker 2: and publicly take an issue with other administration moves. On Saturday,
Speaker 2: he lambasted Vice President JD. Vance for saying that striking
Speaker 2: a boat of alleged drug traffickers is the highest and
Speaker 2: best use of our military. JD. I don't give a
Speaker 2: shit Vance's or JD. I don't give a shit. Vance.
Speaker 2: Oh that's what he's calling him says killing people he
Speaker 2: accuses of a crime is the highest and best use
Speaker 2: of the military, Paul wrote, adding what a dispis a
Speaker 2: despicable and thoughtless sentiment. It is to glorify killing someone
Speaker 2: without a trial.
Speaker 3: I don't really have a problem with them blowing up
Speaker 3: the boat that was leaving Venezuela full of drugs and
Speaker 3: they like, Okay, I think that, yeah, we should throw
Speaker 3: a couple of wrenches into the gears of the car,
Speaker 3: tells machine. Well before Trump ever listed them as a
Speaker 3: terrorist organization, I'm good with that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but it goes against why the system is in place.
Speaker 2: And if you're going this is this is the thing
Speaker 2: is due. But if it's yeah, but it's gonna set precedent,
Speaker 2: it's gonna set precedent. And what's gonna happen is is
Speaker 2: that if it's almost like you cancel one conspiracy theorist
Speaker 2: like they tried to do with Alex Jones, right, it
Speaker 2: sets precedent for allowing the cancelation of every of every.
Speaker 1: Other conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 2: You don't want to set precedent for that kind of shit,
Speaker 2: because today they're bombing you know or you know they're
Speaker 2: they're gonna send a nuke or send a fucking bomb
Speaker 2: over to the bad guys without a trial, and and
Speaker 2: everybody can get behind that.
Speaker 1: That's all.
Speaker 2: That's cool, that's fine. You know, they they shouldn't be
Speaker 2: doing that anyway. But eventually that is going to turn
Speaker 2: around into coming after people without any legislation, without any
Speaker 2: any you know, a court documentation that is needed to
Speaker 2: jump through the political hoops if you believe in the system,
Speaker 2: which we don't. But the system is there for these
Speaker 2: people to abide by and hold into place. And if
Speaker 2: they're jumping over those guidelines, what other guidelines does that
Speaker 2: set precedent for for the other party moving forward? That's
Speaker 2: all I'm saying. No, no, I hear.
Speaker 3: You, I do, and you're right, it would set a
Speaker 3: potentially dangerous precedent. That being said, if you are an
Speaker 3: affiliate with cartel movements, you should expect to have military
Speaker 3: members kicking in your door. I'm I'm personally good with that.
Speaker 3: Being the president, that's set. I mean, I'm just throwing
Speaker 3: it out. I don't think that we're gonna start going
Speaker 3: to war with the Sinaloa cartel. I think that, if
Speaker 3: any it won't be on our streets. If anything, it
Speaker 3: will be over there. But yeah, but that's the thing.
Speaker 3: How many of these illegals have been deported without jurisprudence
Speaker 3: and without jurisprudence, without due processing, all of these things
Speaker 3: because they are illegal, no questions asked, bagged in tag
Speaker 3: sinhome cartel movements with kind of the same thing, like
Speaker 3: you should have arrested the guys on that boat, brought
Speaker 3: them to America to faced trial.
Speaker 1: It's like or we just don't. I mean, I get it. Anyhow.
Speaker 2: The Senate is plodding through consideration of the annual defense
Speaker 2: policy bill, known as the National Devents Authorization Act, which
Speaker 2: isn't expected to be completed this week. Schumer's surprise vote,
Speaker 2: which Senate Majority Leader John Thune out of South Dakota
Speaker 2: dismissed as a political stunt and a hostile act, comes
Speaker 2: just two days after the after the House Oversight Committee,
Speaker 2: which is investigating the Epstein case, released a new trove
Speaker 2: of documents stemming from a subpoena It's sent to Epstein's estate.
Speaker 2: That trove included a leude note Trump allegedly sent to
Speaker 2: Epstein that was part of a book compiled for Epstein's
Speaker 2: fiftieth birthday. Trump has repeatedly denied that he wrote the
Speaker 2: note and filed a lawsuit in July against The Wall
Speaker 2: Street Journal, which first reported on its existence. Speaking to
Speaker 2: NBC News on Tuesday, Trump called the letter a dead issue.
Speaker 3: And that would be the letter in question, where it
Speaker 3: looks like it's a woman's body and his signature at
Speaker 3: the bottom that looks like her pubes and all. We
Speaker 3: talked about it a couple of weeks ago, but there
Speaker 3: is in fact new information that has been released, massive
Speaker 3: amounts of emails that have been released, and Islain Maxwell's testimony,
Speaker 3: which we will get to in a moment, but let's continue.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I'm this whole thing stinks. And I'll tell
Speaker 2: you why. Because they had four years of Biden being
Speaker 2: in the House, and now the Democrats want to speak up.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying, Like, that's what's sketchy about it.
Speaker 1: Why now? What? Right? Why now?
Speaker 3: And then in the middle of their little virtue signal thing,
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk gets assassinated and everyone's talking about Charlie, which
Speaker 3: again I'm not trying to dismiss that, but what I'm
Speaker 3: saying is they are not letting a good cataclysm.
Speaker 1: Go to waste. No, they're not.
Speaker 2: It goes on to say I don't comment on and
Speaker 2: something that's a dead issue. Trump said in a brief
Speaker 2: phone call. I gave all comments to the staff. It's
Speaker 2: a dead issue in the House. The discharge petition to
Speaker 2: force a vote on the massy Kana legislation is on
Speaker 2: track to succeed. It has two hundred and sixteen signatures,
Speaker 2: including all Democrats and four Republicans, and needs just two more.
Speaker 2: Those two are expected to arrive this month in the
Speaker 2: form of a newly elected Democrat in a Virginia special election,
Speaker 2: and another safe blue seat in Arizona that will get
Speaker 2: a special election in late September. Massey told NBC News
Speaker 2: on Tuesday that four Republicans are that the four Republicans
Speaker 2: who have signed on are solidly behind the effort and
Speaker 2: won't bow to pressure to remove their names. He said
Speaker 2: other GOP lawmakers have signaled to him they are open
Speaker 2: to signing the petition, but prefer not to get crosswise
Speaker 2: with Trump or party leaders publicly if their votes aren't
Speaker 2: needed to pass it.
Speaker 3: Oh interesting, so they're saying they would like to see
Speaker 3: this happen. But they're also not trying to screw their
Speaker 3: career over.
Speaker 1: They don't want to show their hand too soon.
Speaker 3: Because their careers and keeping their alliances is more important
Speaker 3: than the justice that will be served if it's going
Speaker 3: to get passed anyway without their vote.
Speaker 2: Okay, So this being tabled for a couple of months,
Speaker 2: knowing now that they only need two more votes, it
Speaker 2: could come in a landslide if what they're saying is true.
Speaker 3: Potentially, But I also have my own reservations on that.
Speaker 3: But we're going to break it all down.
Speaker 2: There's some on the fence, Massey said. My pitch to
Speaker 2: them is we're going to get there anyways. You might
Speaker 2: as well be on the right side of history while
Speaker 2: there's still two slots.
Speaker 1: But that hasn't compelled to anybody.
Speaker 2: Massy said he's certain the vote on the vote count
Speaker 2: on the bill will be larger than the number of
Speaker 2: signers on the discharge petition, which is seen as a
Speaker 2: hostile move against House GOP leaders as it effectively takes
Speaker 2: control of the floor away from them. He said an
Speaker 2: overwhelming House vote would pressure the Senate to take up
Speaker 2: and pass the legislation. I would like to get at
Speaker 2: least a two thirds vote here in the House and
Speaker 2: send that message. That's my goal.
Speaker 1: Massey said.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's ambitious, but I also think even if it
Speaker 2: passes with simple majorities in both chambers, that's a hard
Speaker 2: veto for the president to make, a really hard veto,
Speaker 2: especially given his personal connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: Okay, that last section.
Speaker 3: Boy, if I could have everybody take that last sentence
Speaker 3: and put a big old pen in that, right, that's
Speaker 3: a hard veto for the president to make.
Speaker 1: So let's make sure we're all in the understanding here.
Speaker 3: Even if they had one hundred percent of Republicans and
Speaker 3: Democrats House and Senate and Congress and your and your
Speaker 3: mama and your grandfather, don't matter, if they had everybody
Speaker 3: signed on saying yes, release these files, Trump can still
Speaker 3: veto it. And they're say, well, that's not gonna be
Speaker 3: a good look. This is his last term in office.
Speaker 3: What the fuck does he care?
Speaker 1: Oh, keep that in mind.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that they know that it's inevitable that
Speaker 2: he vetos its.
Speaker 3: Exactly, and I am of the belief as of this
Speaker 3: moment that they are banking on it because.
Speaker 1: They don't want the list released.
Speaker 3: Either because they know that most of them Democrats and
Speaker 3: Republicans regardless. But the Democrats are the ones I'm talking
Speaker 3: about specifically because they're the ones that are taking this
Speaker 3: moral high horse at this moment.
Speaker 1: They know how guilty they are as well.
Speaker 2: They're trying to become the party of truth now, at
Speaker 2: least they're on the surface. On the surface, they want
Speaker 2: to be known as the party that is going after
Speaker 2: the truth, which is what got a Republican president elected
Speaker 2: in the first place. Exactly, they are using this to
Speaker 2: virtue signal.
Speaker 3: It is a big hoax. It's a big song and
Speaker 3: dance routine. And for the record, I'm not saying that
Speaker 3: the Republicans are any more on the moral high horse
Speaker 3: or whatever. I'm saying that the majority of our elected
Speaker 3: officials are either guilty or complicit in the guilt of
Speaker 3: so many of these child predators. But as of this moment,
Speaker 3: the Democrats are trying to make it look like, see,
Speaker 3: we're doing everything we can. We have one hundred percent votes.
Speaker 3: Only four Republicans are even on board. Clearly, they're not
Speaker 3: the ones we need in charge. That's the stance they're taking.
Speaker 2: They're paving the road for something big about to happen
Speaker 2: because if you think about it, so Trump got elected
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, right, and by the end of his
Speaker 2: term it'll be twenty twenty eight. Dude, that is awfully
Speaker 2: close to Agenda twenty thirty.
Speaker 3: There's a lot of things that could happen between now
Speaker 3: and then two midterm elections are coming up, right, A
Speaker 3: lot of shifts can happen in DC. In all, I'm
Speaker 3: not going to say all three houses of our government, right,
Speaker 3: the executive branch is going to be run by the
Speaker 3: Republicans until twenty twenty eight. But my point is as
Speaker 3: far as the House and Congress and Senate, so many
Speaker 3: things can shift in a very very short amount of time.
Speaker 3: They are trying to draw their lines in the sand now,
Speaker 3: and they're trying to use the Epstein conversation as their
Speaker 3: political gas because the Democrats know they ain't hitting on
Speaker 3: shit in any other regard.
Speaker 1: No, they're not. Yeah, this is a dog and pony show,
Speaker 1: I think.
Speaker 3: So now let's talk about that even further. This is actually,
Speaker 3: believe it or not, from the Independent UK, how the
Speaker 3: House could force a vote on releasing all the Epstein
Speaker 3: files even if no more Republicans sign on. This was
Speaker 3: written on September the eleventh, after it was shelved in
Speaker 3: all the things. But they are saying that it's very
Speaker 3: possible that they could just make it happen, even if
Speaker 3: no more Republicans are on board.
Speaker 1: Well, because of the two that they mentioned towards the
Speaker 1: end of that article right, there may be more ways.
Speaker 2: On Wednesday, amid the fracas between Democrats and Republicans about
Speaker 2: the killing of conservative activists Charlie Kirk, the House of
Speaker 2: Representatives swore in its newest member. Democratic Representative James Walkinshaw,
Speaker 2: won his special election for Virginia's eleventh district after the
Speaker 2: death of his former boss, the late Jerry Connolly, who
Speaker 2: died earlier this year. Immediately, Walkinshaw signed the discharge petition
Speaker 2: by Representatives Thomas Massey and Roe Conna to release files
Speaker 2: related to Jeffrey Epstein, and the week since the House
Speaker 2: returned from the August August recess, House Speaker Mike Johnson
Speaker 2: and President Donald Trump have run a blitz campaign to
Speaker 2: prevent other Republicans from signing the petition.
Speaker 3: So they all need one more signature because now they
Speaker 3: got that person from Virginia that they were banking on
Speaker 3: is on board. So now they have the two seventeen
Speaker 3: of the two eighteen required.
Speaker 1: But let's keep going.
Speaker 2: If Massi and Connor receive a majority of signatures, they
Speaker 2: can force a vote on legislation going outside of the
Speaker 2: normal committee process and around leadership. Massey said that he
Speaker 2: was confident the number of signatures would hit two hundred
Speaker 2: and eighteen. We have we have two hundred and seventeen
Speaker 2: of the two hundred and eighteen signatures required. He said
Speaker 2: on x we just need one more Congressman to sign
Speaker 2: the discharge petition in order to force a vote in
Speaker 2: the House on a bill to release the files. Victims
Speaker 2: deserve justice and Americans demand transparency. Let me say this
Speaker 2: real quick. I guarantee you, I guarantee you Trump knows
Speaker 2: who those few people are the wood flip. Be on
Speaker 2: the lookout, be on the lookout for some kind of blackmail.
Speaker 2: Maybe there's going to be somebody that commits suicide. I'm
Speaker 2: telling you watch out for it.
Speaker 3: I'm glad you said it like that. I'm listen, blackmail.
Speaker 3: Possibly be on the lookout for an assassination, a plane crash,
Speaker 3: a car wreck, something like that to take place.
Speaker 1: I am fully on board with what you're saying right now.
Speaker 2: So far, only three Republicans representatives Marjorie Taylor Green of Georgia,
Speaker 2: Lauren Bobert of Colorado, and Nancy Mace of South Carolina,
Speaker 2: have signed onto the discharge petition, while all two hundred
Speaker 2: and thirteen Democrats have signed on to it. On Thursday,
Speaker 2: Massey said they only needed one more signature. Interesting that
Speaker 2: Marjorie Taylor Green signs it because she has been Trump
Speaker 2: trained from the very beginning, and if she's going again, Tim,
Speaker 2: that's a telltale sign right there.
Speaker 3: I will also say, listen, I know that there are
Speaker 3: some people out there that do not get down with MTG. Okay, fine, fine,
Speaker 3: you may not like some of the things that she says.
Speaker 3: There's some things that she stands for. I'll say this
Speaker 3: much as far as Marjorie goes, she has kept it
Speaker 3: ten toes down and stood on this business since day one. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and there's at least a level of respect that must
Speaker 3: be said on that.
Speaker 2: Oh dude, it takes balls to say what she says
Speaker 2: most times.
Speaker 3: Honestly, Oh my god, the fucking ovaries inside that woman
Speaker 3: is insane.
Speaker 2: Somebody get this woman a fucking will barrow. Come on, now,
Speaker 2: you know what I'm saying them ovaries are massive? Is
Speaker 2: that a compliment?
Speaker 1: I don't know. We mean it as a compliment.
Speaker 3: We are equal opportunity here at the Cult of Conspiracy.
Speaker 3: I would think if you got a guy that's got
Speaker 3: such big balls, he needs a whirel barrow, Like yo,
Speaker 3: Marjorie's got some ovaries.
Speaker 1: That are going all the way up to her fucking
Speaker 1: shoulder blades. All right, and that needs to be stated.
Speaker 2: She's got a she's she's messing with a serious laby. Yeah,
Speaker 2: we'll say that in a good way. In a good way,
Speaker 2: I mean, with all due respect.
Speaker 1: On this woman is massive. Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Hey, look some people like it. Some people like roast beef.
Speaker 2: I'm one of them.
Speaker 1: H that.
Speaker 2: I love me a good RB sandwich. Baby teacher, Oh boy,
Speaker 2: sorry about.
Speaker 3: That attracting, But we're also still on the same page.
Speaker 3: Nothing but love and respect for NTG. That's all we're saying.
Speaker 2: Sorry, Yes, we mean it with utmost respect and love.
Speaker 2: We are degenerates, Okay, that's just how we express our
Speaker 2: love in that way.
Speaker 1: That being said, Uh no, uh but no.
Speaker 2: Additional Republicans appear eager to sign on, despite the fact
Speaker 2: that survivors of the late convicted sex offender came to
Speaker 2: Capitol Hill last week to urge a vote on the legislation,
Speaker 2: most Republicans have refused to do so, many in fear
Speaker 2: of angering President Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: You're scared of angering him because you see what happens
Speaker 2: to those that go against him, you know. And that's dude.
Speaker 2: And I know that some people will like, you know,
Speaker 2: throw that and just dismiss it. But like, think about Biff,
Speaker 2: Like I always go back to Biff from back to
Speaker 2: the future, right, like he if people are scared to
Speaker 2: go against him, that's what it reminds me of.
Speaker 1: I see what you mean, I said, I do. And
Speaker 1: but that's the thing.
Speaker 3: Now, we have these survivors that are coming out and
Speaker 3: they're saying they're just gonna make their own fucking list.
Speaker 3: They know they are the eyewitnesses. They are the key
Speaker 3: witness in that investigation in the first place.
Speaker 1: And it's not just Epstein, in Justlaine.
Speaker 3: They know who else was involved because they are victims
Speaker 3: of it.
Speaker 1: They know who they saw at Epstein's.
Speaker 3: Island and at his New York penthouse and in Florida
Speaker 3: they were there, they have eyewitness testimony, they are you
Speaker 3: see what I'm saying, So if they compile their own list,
Speaker 3: this vote ain't gonna mean shit any damn way.
Speaker 2: Interesting that this is called the Epstein Files Transparency Act
Speaker 2: and uh so you you know, obviously the government loves
Speaker 2: their acronyms, so it would.
Speaker 1: Be the e f T a FT.
Speaker 2: But it just reminds me of like an e f T, right,
Speaker 2: which is an e f T payment and if you
Speaker 2: think about it, and which stands for electronic funds Transfer.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so like, could this be some sort of hint that.
Speaker 2: We're going to be going like all digital as far
Speaker 2: as our money goes in the future, Because an electronic
Speaker 2: funds transfer is a way to move money across an
Speaker 2: online network between banks and people. E f T payments
Speaker 2: are frequently used in place of paper based payment methods.
Speaker 2: So I don't know, maybe I'm just drawing at straws.
Speaker 2: I always like to kind of read between the lines,
Speaker 2: you know, could we be coming to some kind of
Speaker 2: digital currency?
Speaker 3: Just saying that that also plays into this other thing
Speaker 3: that I found and we may not even have time
Speaker 3: to get onto it on this episode, that that might
Speaker 3: be an episode and of itself, because you gotta test.
Speaker 3: That's a source on this one. I understand Vladimir Putin just
Speaker 3: released that his investigators. I understand they're Russian investigators. I
Speaker 3: understand that, but bear with me. They have apparently discovered
Speaker 3: that Donald Trump and his cabinet, his department, all of
Speaker 3: these people are in the process of devaluing the dollar
Speaker 3: so that they could transfer it all to a crypto
Speaker 3: based system of economics, so that they could then take
Speaker 3: it and make it gold backed. They plan on swapping
Speaker 3: it all over to crypto tanking, a fucking pump and
Speaker 3: dump tanking the laws dollar and then backing it with
Speaker 3: gold and rebuilding it from the ground up. We may
Speaker 3: not even have a chance to talk about that one
Speaker 3: on this episode. I do have an article pulled up,
Speaker 3: but like I said, I think there's multiple things happening
Speaker 3: at the same time, but nobody can stop talking about
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk long enough to see what's happening.
Speaker 2: Look, it's interesting because just a few weeks ago, Trump
Speaker 2: bought Crypto dot com.
Speaker 1: Interesting he bought crypto dot com.
Speaker 2: There's there's the trump coin that's out there right now
Speaker 2: that is holding its value, which I find to be
Speaker 2: pretty interesting, and he seems to be aligning himself with
Speaker 2: the technocratic future elitists, So just want to throw that
Speaker 2: out there. He's on board with jd. Vance, who is
Speaker 2: on board with Peter Teel, and.
Speaker 3: Who's on board with the Antichrist. I might add, whatever, dude,
Speaker 3: what the fuck?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? You know what?
Speaker 3: That will be the next episode we do as a
Speaker 3: mara fact, We're gonna put a big old pin in
Speaker 3: this Trump crypto conversation. Russia is going on and on
Speaker 3: about it right now. But we do need to test
Speaker 3: the source. I need to do a little more digging.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that'll that'll be the next one I do
Speaker 1: my research on. Fuck yeah.
Speaker 2: The House Oversight Committee's release of a body birthday card
Speaker 2: Trump allegedly sent to Epstein that featured a drawing of
Speaker 2: a naked woman with Trump's signature in place of a
Speaker 2: woman's pubic hair did not trigger a change of heart
Speaker 2: for Republicans. Rather, they deflected or denied they had seen it.
Speaker 2: But two more Democratic leaning seats will hold special elections
Speaker 2: in the coming months on September twenty third, Arizona. Interesting,
Speaker 2: by the way, that's an interesting date because it's the
Speaker 2: day after the fuck autumn equinox, so the like there's
Speaker 2: always shit they I'm telling you if you ever think
Speaker 2: about it, like you know that all TV shows, like
Speaker 2: all the big TV shows, they all come out in
Speaker 2: the fall. And that's said to be like the fall
Speaker 2: of everybody's attention, the fall of you know, the human mind.
Speaker 2: Because nobody's going outside anymore. It's cold. You want everybody
Speaker 2: in front of the television. It's the best place, it's
Speaker 2: the best time for mk Ultra is in the fall.
Speaker 2: So interesting that to be on September twenty third, where
Speaker 2: most eyes will be able to see it. So it
Speaker 2: says on September twenty third, Arizona will hold a special
Speaker 2: election for seventh Congressional District to replace Democratic Republican or
Speaker 2: Democratic Representative Raoul gri Halva, who died earlier this month.
Speaker 3: And we did we talk about that that there is
Speaker 3: a new seat in Arizona, but let's continue. Grijalva's daughter,
Speaker 3: at Alita, is almost guaranteed to sign the petition which
Speaker 3: would give Massi and Kanna discharge petition the requisite two
Speaker 3: hundred and eighteen votes needed to put the discharge petition
Speaker 3: on the floor and in case Democrats need an additional vote.
Speaker 3: On November fourth, Texas will hold a special election to
Speaker 3: fill the seat for Texas's eighteenth district. Freshman Representative Sylvester
Speaker 3: Turner died in March.
Speaker 2: See, like, how are all these people just dying? You
Speaker 2: know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: That's three that they mentioned out.
Speaker 3: Not to mention your boy who died's daughter is now
Speaker 3: going to take his position. Oh, there's no nepotism. What
Speaker 3: are you even talking about?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's really really fucking strange by the way these
Speaker 2: people and their kids usually couldn't think even more different
Speaker 2: than what their parents think of. Like usually it's like
Speaker 2: polar opposite example. How about did you see The Rock's
Speaker 2: daughter had something to say about the about the whole
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk thing.
Speaker 3: Really, I know The Rock is like very very liberal.
Speaker 3: I don't know what his daughter's saying.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but he's not extremely outspoken about his liberal stuff
Speaker 2: like somene of it is. But his daughter, dude, is
Speaker 2: a full singing like a canary right now. As far
Speaker 2: as like I'm talking about like extreme left against Charlie
Speaker 2: Kirk in that sense.
Speaker 3: Dwayne Johnson aka The Rock is a. He's an actor, right,
Speaker 3: He's a performer, and he knows that. Yes, he has
Speaker 3: his political leanings, but I don't think I've ever seen
Speaker 3: him go on a thirty minute tirade about one thing
Speaker 3: or another when it comes to politics, because he is
Speaker 3: also smart enough to understand that if you do that,
Speaker 3: you section off half of your fan base.
Speaker 1: And he's not about that action neither.
Speaker 3: He's trying to make more movies and make more monet
Speaker 3: So it makes sense that he would kind of keep
Speaker 3: a lot of.
Speaker 1: His political leanings close to the chest.
Speaker 3: But yeah, he is a Democrat, and I'm not saying
Speaker 3: he's a screaming libtard by any means. Maybe he closeted
Speaker 3: is a screaming libtard. I just don't see that. We've
Speaker 3: never heard that his daughter, who has had nothing but
Speaker 3: abject wealth her entire life, who is so detached from reality,
Speaker 3: because that's what happens when you grow up in a
Speaker 3: hundreds of millions of dollars household. You don't understand what
Speaker 3: the common man wants anymore. You think you do, you
Speaker 3: have no fucking clue.
Speaker 2: The Rock aka the Brahma Ble aka the People's Champ
Speaker 2: aka the final Boss.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I just think that it's strange that his daughter's coming
Speaker 2: out and like voice in her opinion so publicly about
Speaker 2: that kind of shit.
Speaker 3: Like Jaden Willow Smith coming out to talk about what
Speaker 3: they think in the political space. It's like, first of all,
Speaker 3: neither of you have ever wanted for anything in your life.
Speaker 3: You have no idea what somebody in these streets or
Speaker 3: in these fields, or in that city or whatever, in
Speaker 3: the the actual consensus of America.
Speaker 1: You have no fucking idea what people want.
Speaker 2: Yes, but there's a lot of eyes on them from
Speaker 2: the young'ins. And you know that a lot of this
Speaker 2: political stuff, especially the Democrats, are really good at this.
Speaker 2: They're really good at targeting young people, like even even
Speaker 2: like pre voting age. Like I'm telling you, dude, like,
Speaker 2: why is my thirteen year old even back whenever Trump
Speaker 2: was running, she was twelve, right whenever Trump was running,
Speaker 2: and there was the whole thing between who's gonna win
Speaker 2: between Trump and Biden, who's going to be elected president?
Speaker 2: Or Trump and Kamala Rather, my daughter was talking about that,
Speaker 2: and everybody in her school was talking about that. You
Speaker 2: can't even vote for six more years why do you
Speaker 2: need an opinion on this? But yet it is right
Speaker 2: because social media has their hooks and everybody's back, especially
Speaker 2: the young the ute.
Speaker 3: A hell, even when I was in middle school and
Speaker 3: in high school, me and my friends would talk about
Speaker 3: political things and the elections that were coming up and
Speaker 3: stuff like that.
Speaker 1: That's that's a thing. But you're right.
Speaker 3: The Democrat party, the liberal media has their hooks in
Speaker 3: the youth.
Speaker 1: And that is why the Charlie Kirks of this world were.
Speaker 3: Going to college campuses and trouncing these fucking twenty twenty
Speaker 3: two to twenty three year olds who thought they knew
Speaker 3: a thing or two. And then when you provide them
Speaker 3: with just logic and actually make them think for themselves
Speaker 3: rather than what their professors and what their tiktoks and
Speaker 3: whatever else is telling them to think. When you would
Speaker 3: confront them with just very basic facts and questions, they
Speaker 3: crumbled every time.
Speaker 1: That's why Charlie Kirk was so dangerous.
Speaker 3: He was forcing the young people to think for themselves,
Speaker 3: and that is dangerous for the left a one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: So it says, uh, we got yeah, Sylvester.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 2: For the most part, Democrats have been saddled by the
Speaker 2: fact that they're overwhelmingly older. Caucus has meant that they
Speaker 2: lose crucial votes simply by a member falling ill or dying.
Speaker 2: But these special elections might wind up being the spark
Speaker 2: that finally sets off the bombshell in the House Representatives.
Speaker 1: It's very, very possible.
Speaker 2: Bro At the same time, the legislation would still need
Speaker 2: to receive a vote in the Senate. On Thursday, Senate
Speaker 2: Minority leader forced a vote on an amendment to the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty six National Defense Authorization Act, which grants the
Speaker 2: authority for pentagon spending, but Senate Republicans blocked the attempt
Speaker 2: fifty one to forty nine. Only two Republicans, Josh Holly
Speaker 2: and Rampaul joined the Democrats.
Speaker 3: So you see that they are drawing hard lines in
Speaker 3: the sand, and they are doing this virtue signaling, song
Speaker 3: and dance to make it seem that, oh, we are
Speaker 3: the only party that actually cares about victims. We are
Speaker 3: the only ones doing what needs to be done. When
Speaker 3: the history is written down, we're going to be on
Speaker 3: the right side of it. Never mind the fact that
Speaker 3: you were also the side that was trying to let
Speaker 3: grown men go into women's bathrooms, and almost instantly there
Speaker 3: were hundreds of examples of dudes taking pictures of girls
Speaker 3: in little girls' bathrooms because they were claiming to be
Speaker 3: trans That's the same group.
Speaker 1: These are the same elected officials who voted yes to that. So, like,
Speaker 1: before we.
Speaker 3: Get all up in arms over this moral high horse
Speaker 3: or trying to go on, let's keep it one hundred
Speaker 3: across the board.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what is a woman? Uh so anybody who who
Speaker 2: thinks that.
Speaker 1: They're a woman. No, no, no, but what is a woman?
Speaker 2: And like you saw that conversation with Charlie Kirk and
Speaker 2: he was, you know, asking people, he all that. I
Speaker 2: think that that was like a main talking point at
Speaker 2: every university they went to, and nobody could answer what
Speaker 2: is a woman without using the word woman in the definition.
Speaker 2: They're like, well, anybody who feels like a woman. So
Speaker 2: a bird can feel like a woman, you know, like
Speaker 2: a frog can feel like a woman.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like so crazy.
Speaker 3: This is the same group that dismissed all biology, which
Speaker 3: is a science, but then when it came time to
Speaker 3: get vexed, told you to trust the science. This is
Speaker 3: that same group and now they are coming out of
Speaker 3: left field, U punintended and saying we are the ones
Speaker 3: that are on the side of the victims. The Republicans
Speaker 3: are the evil ones trying to keep them down. Now
Speaker 3: that being said, I am all in favor of the
Speaker 3: Epstein files being released, and I want more Republicans to
Speaker 3: be on board with that. But let's not dismiss it
Speaker 3: like only the Democrats are the innocent ones on this.
Speaker 3: They know that they are guilty, they know their names
Speaker 3: are on the list, but they also know for a
Speaker 3: fact that Trump will veto it. Even if it's one
Speaker 3: hundred percent voted on in all places by all parties,
Speaker 3: it's not going to go anywhere. They are using this
Speaker 3: as they're trying to put fuel into their gas tank
Speaker 3: for this next election cycle.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, because this is Trump's last term.
Speaker 2: You know, he vetos it, who cares because he can't
Speaker 2: get voted in again. But what I think that it
Speaker 2: does set precedent for is that if the majority of
Speaker 2: Republicans that are also vetoing it, that are going against,
Speaker 2: you know, allowing it to be released, including Trump vetoing it,
Speaker 2: that almost can out everybody. And the Democrats can use
Speaker 2: that as a standing point and say look, we voted
Speaker 2: to release all these files, you know, and these are
Speaker 2: all the people. This person that is running for president
Speaker 2: voted against it. This person from this state voted against it.
Speaker 2: It almost disqualifies them, you know what I'm saying, Like
Speaker 2: it's almost like a political metaphorical assassination.
Speaker 3: At that point, it pretty much makes our political conversation
Speaker 3: a complete wash. And it shows that there're shitheads on
Speaker 3: every single side of the aisle.
Speaker 1: And which we've known.
Speaker 3: We've said this for forever, but this only just brings
Speaker 3: it more to light for everyone else, and it's not
Speaker 3: looking good that being set. Bloomberg actually recently obtained a
Speaker 3: trove of Epstein's personal emails.
Speaker 1: They wrote a big article about it.
Speaker 3: I have a section of that article we're gonna read
Speaker 3: here in a moment, but here is a news clip
Speaker 3: from MSNBC to talk about it a little in detail.
Speaker 3: And let's keep in mind this was at least three
Speaker 3: days ago, all the votes that were taking place on
Speaker 3: the tenth on Wednesday, all these things, it's all coming
Speaker 3: to a head. But again, no one is talking about
Speaker 3: this because they're more concerned with what went down in Utah.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's it's pretty interesting that it was Bloomberg
Speaker 2: because Michael Bloomberg tried running for the last presidential election.
Speaker 2: He got like no votes, dude, Like nobody fucking wanted him,
Speaker 2: and so it is interesting that he's the one that's
Speaker 2: almost making is it a desperate attempt to try and
Speaker 2: get elected in the next election psychle I wonder.
Speaker 3: I suppose it's possible, because I mean, he's a Democrat, right,
Speaker 3: and it's not like they have anybody to run that's
Speaker 3: worth a fuck aoc. I've heard her being brought up,
Speaker 3: but it's like, I don't even know if she's old
Speaker 3: enough to really qualify, and even if she is, everyone
Speaker 3: sees her as a fucking psychopath. I don't think she's
Speaker 3: actually got any real gas in the tank, because you
Speaker 3: got to have.
Speaker 2: A news and maybe thirty five years old to run
Speaker 2: for resident.
Speaker 3: For I think it's thirty five. It's been a while
Speaker 3: since I looked at it. I want to say she's
Speaker 3: like thirty three, thirty four. I think she's turning thirty five,
Speaker 3: but it's not going to be in time for the election.
Speaker 1: I don't know, Okay, But.
Speaker 3: My point is, though the Democrats have nobody to actually
Speaker 3: put up that's going to be seen in a positive light.
Speaker 3: So this is maybe this is a big attempt for
Speaker 3: Bloomberg to actually try to run again and have a
Speaker 3: better go of it.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, um yeah, you got to be thirty five to
Speaker 2: run for president. So to run for the president of
Speaker 2: the United States, a candidate must be at least thirty
Speaker 2: five years old. Additionally, they must be a natural born
Speaker 2: citizen and have been a resident of the United States
Speaker 2: for at least fourteen years.
Speaker 1: Well that's interesting.
Speaker 2: Why do you got to be a natural Oh okay,
Speaker 2: in case you move out, you have to be living back.
Speaker 1: Here for at least fourteen years.
Speaker 3: Like Arnold Schwarzenegger can't run for presidency. He wasn't born
Speaker 3: in America either, was a Romist exactly, which is why
Speaker 3: it was so crazy that they never released his birth
Speaker 3: certificate the entire time.
Speaker 1: That's what most of the Republicans want it, Like, dude,
Speaker 1: it's prove us wrong.
Speaker 3: It's a piece of paper, and you we could pull
Speaker 3: public records and just look it up, even though they
Speaker 3: tried that and couldn't find it.
Speaker 2: And then you see the actual birth certificate and you
Speaker 2: throw it into an editing center. On your computer, and
Speaker 2: you can see that it was just a blueprint overlay
Speaker 2: shot out to demon Eraser for blowing the lid off
Speaker 2: of that one, because it was so evident, it was
Speaker 2: so obvious, and by relasing, by erasing the the you know,
Speaker 2: the whatever it was that was on top, you could see, Yes,
Speaker 2: he's from president, he's from Kenya, and his name is
Speaker 2: Barrys or Toro. Like crazy, dude.
Speaker 3: They didn't even like, okay, if you're gonna do an
Speaker 3: edit on that, like screenshot the edit and put that
Speaker 3: out as the official document.
Speaker 1: They left it with an undue function.
Speaker 3: You could just upload it to Adobe and keep pressing undue,
Speaker 3: undue undo and see what the document was supposed to say.
Speaker 3: It was so lazy. Yeah, but they said fuck it.
Speaker 3: Y'all can't do anything about it now anyway, so go
Speaker 3: for it. Meanwhile, Trump's currently trying to get him for
Speaker 3: fraud for the election and all these things.
Speaker 1: But talk about that all another time.
Speaker 3: Now, with the Bloomberg conversation and these emails that were obtained,
Speaker 3: keep in mind, I don't really think the Democrats want
Speaker 3: this released, but I could be wrong. I'm not exactly
Speaker 3: batting a thousand on everything. Every single thing I've ever said.
Speaker 3: So let's listen in on what these emails consist of.
Speaker 6: Oh, gille Maxwell didn't testify in her own defense at
Speaker 6: her criminal trial, but she did give civil depositions. She
Speaker 6: was incredibly evasive, and when she wasn't evasive, she outright
Speaker 6: denied any of the conduct that is at issue here.
Speaker 6: But as you reference, she was charged with two counts
Speaker 6: of perjury by the Southern District of New York. They
Speaker 6: didn't ultimately try her on those counts because they obtained
Speaker 6: convictions on the sex trafficking charges, and those convictions they
Speaker 6: believed were sufficient to put Gilen Maxwell away for a
Speaker 6: long time. That, of course, is now somewhat in doubt
Speaker 6: because she has obtained that transfer to a lower security facility,
Speaker 6: and because the President continues to dangle the possibility of
Speaker 6: a pardon to Gleine Maxwell. But if you listen to
Speaker 6: victims and their lawyers, if you listen to prosecutors, Ghalie
Speaker 6: Maxwell's credibility has long been in doubt, and she has
Speaker 6: in turn tried to ruin the credibility of others. Simon,
Speaker 6: you and I were talking before we began, and I
Speaker 6: said that the Bloomberg reporting didn't much surprise me because
Speaker 6: although these were several thousand emails from a Yahoo account
Speaker 6: owned by Jeffrey Epstein, we have seen emails between the
Speaker 6: two of them in civil litigation, emails that have been unsealed.
Speaker 6: And one of them that has stuck with me that
Speaker 6: I have a picture of in my phone because it
Speaker 6: bothered me so much, was Gilli Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 6: talking about Virginia Geffrey. She is perhaps the most famous
Speaker 6: victim and unfortunately died by suicide earlier this year, in
Speaker 6: two thousand fifteen. I just want to pause there, because
Speaker 6: that is a decade plus after Ghleainne Maxwell is telling
Speaker 6: Todd Blanche her work for Jeffrey Epstein has mostly wrapped up.
Speaker 6: This is the conversation that they have from Epstein to Maxwell,
Speaker 6: you can issue a reward to any of Virginia's friends, acquaintances,
Speaker 6: family that come forward and help prove her allegations are false.
Speaker 6: And then he continues to detail what he thinks are
Speaker 6: her strongest or most damaging allegations, and there are two
Speaker 6: of them. But the fact that they are having that
Speaker 6: conversation in twenty fifteen, as Ghalaie Maxwell is involved in
Speaker 6: a defamation lawsuit against Virginia Giuffrey Jeffrey Epstein behind the
Speaker 6: scenes still at that point uncharged by the Southern District
Speaker 6: of New York telling Glene Maxwell secretly, you can pay
Speaker 6: money to people who say that Virginia is lying. That's heinous,
Speaker 6: and so I'm not surprised by today's reporting. We should
Speaker 6: congratulate our friends at Bloomberg on that reporting. Coup eighteen
Speaker 6: thousand emails is nothing to sneeze at, and I sure
Speaker 6: would love to get my hands on them and see them.
Speaker 6: But should we be surprised that Elaine Maxwell wasn't telling
Speaker 6: Todd Blanche the complete truth?
Speaker 7: Absolutely well, to just emphasize your point about how heinous
Speaker 7: that was, there is a statement today from the family
Speaker 7: of Virgina Jufrey. This is what they write. These emails
Speaker 7: from Bloomberg only further illustrate why the DOJ should never
Speaker 7: negotiate with someone willing to do or say anything to
Speaker 7: secure a deal. Elaine Maxwell deserves to rot in a
Speaker 7: maximum security prison for her heinous crimes. The fact that
Speaker 7: she has been afforded the luxury of sitting in a
Speaker 7: minimum security prison is a disgrace to our sister survivors
Speaker 7: and the justice system. This is corruption at its finest.
Speaker 7: It's time to stand firm and demand justice for all survivors.
Speaker 7: No more excuses, no more delays. I think what I
Speaker 7: was reminded of today by the Bloomberg reporting is that
Speaker 7: we talk about paths to accountability from the legal paths
Speaker 7: that we're seeing, whether they be in the form of
Speaker 7: law suits, some of these efforts on the part of
Speaker 7: the House over Site Committee, the Kanna Massy discharge petition,
Speaker 7: but there's also the reality that good journalism puts the
Speaker 7: focus back on these survivors, on these stories and points
Speaker 7: out holes in Galane Maxwell's own retelling of the story.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, and I want to highlight another journalist who's done
Speaker 6: sensational work in this area, Julie K. Brown, who is
Speaker 6: the first person, perhaps to really thoroughly excavate what had
Speaker 6: happened here.
Speaker 3: She has an ongoing.
Speaker 6: Legal proceeding to unseal even more of the civil litigation files,
Speaker 6: and there's been a recent second Circuit decision that has
Speaker 6: put it back in the hands of a District court
Speaker 6: judge here in Manhattan to unseal more of those files
Speaker 6: and so we can and expect more of these things
Speaker 6: to come out, not through a congressional investigation, not through
Speaker 6: the DOJ's own willingness to share it with us, but
Speaker 6: because there are people like Jason Leopold and his team
Speaker 6: at Bloomberg, and Julie K. Brown and Miami Herald, and
Speaker 6: perhaps even some folks here at MSNBC who will uncover
Speaker 6: more of that truth.
Speaker 8: Alicia, I want to shift to the future short term.
Speaker 8: A week from now, you're going to have depositions beginning.
Speaker 8: The schedule right now starts on September nineteenth with Alex Acosta,
Speaker 8: then goes to Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, James call me
Speaker 8: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton. Acosta is a big piece of
Speaker 8: this storyline, and we've talked about that. I'm curious your
Speaker 8: thoughts about the rest on that schedule. What does that
Speaker 8: say to you? Why do you think they're being called,
Speaker 8: what do you think they have to offer a legal
Speaker 8: versus political.
Speaker 6: Let's start with Merrick Garland, because that's the one that
Speaker 6: I have the biggest question mark about. To my mind,
Speaker 6: Merrick Garland doesn't belong on this list. At the time
Speaker 6: that Merrick Garland was the Attorney general, Gilleenn Maxwell was
Speaker 6: approaching trial, and the Department of Justice has said, and
Speaker 6: this is one thing that I continue to believe, from
Speaker 6: administration to administration, is in fact the case that while
Speaker 6: there are many people who sanction the conduct, turn the
Speaker 6: other way to the conduct that is a political and
Speaker 6: an ethical abomination, But what it's not is a crime.
Speaker 6: And so was there anything further from Merrick Garland and
Speaker 6: the Department of Justice to follow up on while he
Speaker 6: was Attorney General. I don't think so. I think most
Speaker 6: of those people against whom the Department of Justice at
Speaker 6: the time could predicate a criminal investigation were investigated. And
Speaker 6: one more thing, Michael, that I want to add here.
Speaker 6: When we talk about criminal accountability, it's complicated. A lot
Speaker 6: of the people that could have been held responsible are
Speaker 6: people that we might see in a new light today,
Speaker 6: like Hailey Robson who stood up at that press conference
Speaker 6: and said, my life has been ruined, death threats have
Speaker 6: been lodged against me. I have been described as a
Speaker 6: co conspirator, but in actuality I was Jeffrey Epstein's vicy.
Speaker 6: Did I recruit other people to lessen the impact on
Speaker 6: the harm on me?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 6: I did that, But One of the reasons you don't
Speaker 6: see more people having been prosecuted is because I would
Speaker 6: venture a guess that Hailey Robinson is far from alone
Speaker 6: in that that there are scores of other women that
Speaker 6: in the press and media have been described as recruiters
Speaker 6: but in actuality, and hopefully some of them will come
Speaker 6: out of the shadows and talk further and actuality they
Speaker 6: themselves were abused by Jeffrey Epstein forriers.
Speaker 5: I just will note that there is criminal accountability and
Speaker 5: then there is some of the actions are not criminal.
Speaker 5: And the UK ambassador is a good example, UK fired
Speaker 5: as ambassador to Washington, or the emails to Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 5: not saying that he participated in any of the conduct,
Speaker 5: but the mere association.
Speaker 8: Just the way it was, Miss Ruben, thank you so
Speaker 8: much for being with us now.
Speaker 3: A couple of big things that were just kind of
Speaker 3: talked about and then glanced over there. Even the UK
Speaker 3: fired one of their officials because he was too friendly
Speaker 3: with Epstein. Right now, emailing somebody who is a despicable
Speaker 3: piece of shit is not against the law, but whatever
Speaker 3: was in those emails was so egregious that they felt
Speaker 3: the need to fire him over it.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's cool.
Speaker 3: That's cool that being said, of this list right here,
Speaker 3: of these players, a couple of them are kind of
Speaker 3: interesting that they are going to be called in for
Speaker 3: questioning for an oversight deposition. Right, we already got Acosta
Speaker 3: and Holder, right, Okay, these are that was a former
Speaker 3: Secretary of Labor and the former attorney general. Then all right,
Speaker 3: so we got ag Merritt Garland. Let's say that he
Speaker 3: was brought in and he shouldn't have been. James Comy
Speaker 3: and then Bill and Killery Clinton. What will they have
Speaker 3: to add in to the Epstein conversation.
Speaker 1: I'm just curious.
Speaker 2: Yeah, James Comy, former FBI director, the Clintons, which is
Speaker 2: very interesting considering that there was a painting of Bill
Speaker 2: Clinton in a blue dress and red high heels inside
Speaker 2: of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment. Hillary Clinton also known as wearing
Speaker 2: other little children's faces and drinking their drenochrome. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I would say that there's a there's some fuckery rate here, sir.
Speaker 3: There is, indeed, and this is my point, as the
Speaker 3: Democrat Party is trying to go on this massive virtue
Speaker 3: signaling moral high horse conversation. Right now, all of these
Speaker 3: people that are currently going in for questioning in conversation
Speaker 3: about Epstein are all big Democrat supporters and in the
Speaker 3: administration of very big Democrat party members. So that being said,
Speaker 3: it's like they're trying to get ahead of it now
Speaker 3: to make it seem like they are the best, the
Speaker 3: most virtuous there on the side of the victims, when
Speaker 3: clearly their figureheads were a part of the problem.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you see the road out there too, that Komy
Speaker 2: was the FBI director from twenty thirteen to twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: under Obama.
Speaker 1: Under Obama, yeah, and.
Speaker 2: I mean that's whenever a lot of this Epstein shit
Speaker 2: was taking place right.
Speaker 3: Well, under Obama and Trump. I should mention that too.
Speaker 3: But that's my point. A lot of this stuff with
Speaker 3: it with Epstein, his arrest and all the documents and
Speaker 3: all the connections and everything. He was at the forefront
Speaker 3: of the investigation. He was the director of the FBI,
Speaker 3: So regardless of what party he served under, whether it
Speaker 3: was a Republican led cabinet or a Democrat led cabinet,
Speaker 3: if the investigation being done by the FBI was into
Speaker 3: Epstein while he was director, yeah, he needs to be
Speaker 3: brought in for questioning, right, But then, what in the
Speaker 3: fuck does Killery or Bill Clinton have to do with
Speaker 3: any of this? Except for the fact that they knew
Speaker 3: Epstein extremely well, they are on the list all of
Speaker 3: the things. So with this in mind, that got me
Speaker 3: down a whole different kind of rabbit hole. There are
Speaker 3: a lot of political figures on either side of the
Speaker 3: aisle that have been affiliated and associated with doing horrible
Speaker 3: child predatory things, right, and I feel like we may
Speaker 3: say this, but I also feel like a few big
Speaker 3: examples might go a long way.
Speaker 1: So we're just gonna do a couple of those right now.
Speaker 3: Matter of fact, we don't have to read the entire
Speaker 3: thing on each of these individuals, but I think it's
Speaker 3: worth the listen. So this is from the US Immigration
Speaker 3: and Customs Enforcement website. Former Illinois state representative sentenced to
Speaker 3: eight years in federal prison for transporting child pornography. I
Speaker 3: should mention this now. This is the section of the
Speaker 3: podcast where we really did. That's why I give the disclaimer.
Speaker 3: This list that we're about to go into right now,
Speaker 3: y'all put your ear condoms on. Okay, it's gonna get ugly,
Speaker 3: it's gonna get nasty. There is no looking up for
Speaker 3: pretty much the rest of this episode, and then, don't
Speaker 3: get me wrong, we are also going to talk about
Speaker 3: some Republican pieces of shit towards the end.
Speaker 1: But we do need to make a mention of this.
Speaker 3: As far as the Democrats are the ones wanting the
Speaker 3: files released, they're the only ones. And this is it's
Speaker 3: not so cut and dry. I this is why I
Speaker 3: believe that this is a part of their plan.
Speaker 2: So this is an individual that so this was written
Speaker 2: in twenty fifteen, he was sentenced to eight years, so obviously,
Speaker 2: well this could have been some kind of involvement with
Speaker 2: Epstein esque type shit, right.
Speaker 3: I'm just saying as far as the yes, possibly, but
Speaker 3: also just saying that it doesn't matter. Some of these
Speaker 3: are going to predate the Epstein conversation. But my point
Speaker 3: is the Democrats trying to make it seem like they're
Speaker 3: not a part of it, like they are somehow of
Speaker 3: a moral high point that they can look down and say,
Speaker 3: you're not wanting to release this file, how dare you?
Speaker 3: Y'all are equally guilty, not just on the Epstein file,
Speaker 3: but just on the child predatory actions.
Speaker 2: Yeah, by the way, they're only trying to shift all
Speaker 2: this Epstein attention on Trump. They're not calling out anybody else,
Speaker 2: They're not mentioning any other name. They are directing it
Speaker 2: at Trump. And now I will say that whoever was
Speaker 2: involved in all of Epstein, Epstein's fucking little crazy pedophilic adventures,
Speaker 2: you all need to go down, like there's no doubt
Speaker 2: about it. I think that you speaking of public execution.
Speaker 2: They should all be publicly executed. Let's just be honest
Speaker 2: here and I and just the fact that Trump is,
Speaker 2: you know, weighing possibly pardoning, just laying Maxwell. I have
Speaker 2: an issue with that, especially whenever she went off to
Speaker 2: prison and he said I wish her well, you know
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. It's like, it's weird. It's weird.
Speaker 1: Oh, Keith, this in mind, Brier. Let's break this down here.
Speaker 3: State Representative Keith Farnham was sentenced on Thursday to eight
Speaker 3: years in federal prison for the transportation of child pornography
Speaker 3: via computers in his office and residents last year. Again,
Speaker 3: this is from twenty fifteen. By his office, They do
Speaker 3: mean his office in Washington, d C. Where he was
Speaker 3: a representative for the state of Illinois. Okay, now, let's
Speaker 3: keep it going here.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: I do want to say that this is the best
Speaker 2: use of blackmail. So it's not to say that he
Speaker 2: absolutely did it, but he pled guilty. Diddy, oh oh Gil.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you listen, brother, this is not gonna get good.
Speaker 3: There is no upside to any of this. It's about
Speaker 3: to get bad.
Speaker 1: Let's keep going here.
Speaker 3: He resigned in his seat from the Illinois General Assembly
Speaker 3: in March twenty fourteen, less than a week after HSI,
Speaker 3: which is the Homeland Security Investigations Special Agencies, computers from
Speaker 3: his home and office.
Speaker 1: Farnham, who was sixty seven of.
Speaker 3: Elgin, Illinois, was ordered to pay a thirty thousand dollars
Speaker 3: fine and must report to prison May nineteenth. Farnhum pled
Speaker 3: guilty in December of twenty fourteen, admitting that don't. On
Speaker 3: November twenty fifth, twenty thirteen, he sent an email from
Speaker 3: a computer in his elegant office with the following message
Speaker 3: do you trade this is what I like. Farnham attached
Speaker 3: two files to the email that he knew contained child pornography.
Speaker 1: In addition, he possessed images and videos depicting.
Speaker 3: Child pornography on computers and electronic storage devices in his residence, car,
Speaker 3: and office. During the course of the investigation, HSI special
Speaker 3: agents executed federal search warrants at Farnham State office and
Speaker 3: Elgan residents. Seized computers and electronic storage devices. On the
Speaker 3: day the warrants were executed. Farnham possessed no fewer than
Speaker 3: two thousand, seven hundred and sixty five images of real
Speaker 3: miners engaged in sexually explicit acts, including sexual intercourse with
Speaker 3: pre pubescent children he himself. Some of these images involved
Speaker 3: sadistic or masochistic conduct and depictions of violence, according to
Speaker 3: Farnham's guilty plea, by his own admission, oh my god. Okay,
Speaker 3: so now we're all on the same page here.
Speaker 1: Okay, stop blackmail. No no, no, no, you don't just
Speaker 1: admit to something like that. No, you do not.
Speaker 8: Uh.
Speaker 3: This investigation was kentucted under hsi's Operation Predator and International
Speaker 3: Initiative to protect children from sexual predators. Since the launch
Speaker 3: of Operation Predator in two thousand and three, HSI has
Speaker 3: arrested more than ten thousand individuals for crimes against children,
Speaker 3: including the production, distribution of online shop pornography, traveling overseas
Speaker 3: for sex with minors, and sex trafficking of children. In
Speaker 3: the fiscal year of twenty fourteen, more than twenty three
Speaker 3: hundred individuals were arrested by HSI special agents under this initiative,
Speaker 3: and more than a thousand victims identified and rescued. Right,
Speaker 3: sound of freedom, anybody. This is a part of Operation Predator,
Speaker 3: So okay, go on thirteen.
Speaker 2: Right, that's dude, it's it is disheartening to know that
Speaker 2: there's that many people that are doing this kind of shit.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's it's horrible.
Speaker 3: I don't know if you've looked in your area of
Speaker 3: how many predators there are in your neighborhood that have
Speaker 3: to register and file in all of that. But yeah,
Speaker 3: it's a mess. So let's keep going. That was then
Speaker 3: that's one guy. It's one bad apple. Let's continue here.
Speaker 3: Little Rock, Arkansas, a former chairman of Pulaski County Democratic Party,
Speaker 3: was sentenced to fourteen years in federal prison on Thursday
Speaker 3: after pleading guilty to four counts related to the distribution
Speaker 3: of child pornography. This was from twenty twenty three. According
Speaker 3: to the court documents. Harold Moody Junior was sentenced to
Speaker 3: serve one hundred and sixty eight months in the custody
Speaker 3: of Federal Bureau of Prisons and will be required to
Speaker 3: receive psycho sexual evaluation and participate in sex offender counseling.
Speaker 1: Moody, who was.
Speaker 3: Served who also served as the special Events coordinator for
Speaker 3: Pulaski County Youth Services, is also required to seek treatment
Speaker 3: for substance abuse and mental health issues.
Speaker 1: The sentencing said.
Speaker 3: The district judge also ordered Moody to pay a restitution
Speaker 3: to his victims in the amount of thirty nine thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: You know what bothers me the most about this is
Speaker 2: that that one hundred and sixty eight months. That's fourteen years,
Speaker 2: fourteen years of taxpayer dollars that are going to feeding
Speaker 2: this piece of shit while he's rotten away in prison
Speaker 2: and he gets to come out. Now, how old was he?
Speaker 1: Did it? Say? Uh? Sixty? Hold on here, he didn't
Speaker 1: say his age yet.
Speaker 3: Okay, I think it says end a little bit, all right,
Speaker 3: but continuing, it says Moody was arrested in twenty eighteen
Speaker 3: following an investigation into online child explore exploitation chat rooms.
Speaker 3: And he'll start five years of supervised released after his
Speaker 3: time in prison and must register as a sex offender.
Speaker 3: According to a twenty eighteen complaint, Affidavid Moody was present
Speaker 3: in a chat room twice on August twenty ninth when
Speaker 3: chod pornography was being displayed. Authority said Moody's face was
Speaker 3: clearly visible in his webcam and the undercover agent also
Speaker 3: noticed what appeared to be an office setting in the background.
Speaker 3: He was at the Democratic Convention for Arkansas. He was
Speaker 3: at his office doing this, so just throwing that out.
Speaker 3: Among the images that Moody distributed was a video that
Speaker 3: depicted a new dud adult male performing oral sex on
Speaker 3: two new prepubescent males in twenty eighteen. According to the complaint,
Speaker 3: Moody then follows the video with the following chat message
Speaker 3: sent to all participants of the chat room. Not the
Speaker 3: version I thought, Moody responded via chat message. I've heard
Speaker 3: of white privilege, but never perve privilege. I am not
Speaker 3: the jukebox at waffle house. I do not play on demand.
Speaker 3: The news release continued, Yeah, this is this.
Speaker 1: Is the that's the party, you know, these are these people.
Speaker 3: Distribution of child porn carries a penalty of no less
Speaker 3: than five years in more than twenty years in prison
Speaker 3: not less than five years to life of supervisor release,
Speaker 3: and a fine of up to two hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Possession of child.
Speaker 3: Porn carries a penalty of not more than ten years
Speaker 3: in prison, not less than five with life supervisor release,
Speaker 3: and a fine of up to two hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars. The investigation was initially conducted by Homeland Security
Speaker 3: Investigations and was prosecuted by the Assistant US Attorney Christen
Speaker 3: Bryant and Alison Bragg.
Speaker 2: Okay, I have a problem with that. Go back down
Speaker 2: to that bottom part again. Yeah, So, distribution of child
Speaker 2: porn carries a penalty of not less than five years
Speaker 2: and not more than twenty years. Why why not more
Speaker 2: than twenty years? Are you talking about children?
Speaker 3: Bro?
Speaker 1: No? No, I agree.
Speaker 3: I think anybody who has any hand in the distribution
Speaker 3: or creation or whatever of this material should be fried alive,
Speaker 3: even if you're just the middleman.
Speaker 2: Just think about it. If you're somebody that is writing
Speaker 2: up these laws, I think twenty years is that's a
Speaker 2: you know, twenty one years, that's a bit extreme.
Speaker 1: What Yeah? Yeahke? Who like? It?
Speaker 2: Just baffles me that these people are even able to
Speaker 2: get out, nonetheless even able to stay alive. Like, we
Speaker 2: need to bring back the electric electric chair public executions.
Speaker 2: What is it called what the Brook? You used to
Speaker 2: always talk about, Sparky, No, what what Brook used to
Speaker 2: always talk about? Where they would they would have a
Speaker 2: bunch of people shooting him.
Speaker 1: Oh, the fire squad.
Speaker 3: They just did that as a matter of fact in
Speaker 3: South Carolina, a guy opted to be killed by firing squad.
Speaker 1: They just brought that back this past year. Good.
Speaker 2: I mean, we need some public hangings, bro, Like, I'm
Speaker 2: sorry every single like predator out there. I don't care
Speaker 2: if you you know, you went to jail, you did
Speaker 2: your time, you found christ and you started, you know,
Speaker 2: donating to charities. No, you're done, You're done.
Speaker 1: Bro, But hear me out.
Speaker 3: Remember it said five to twenty right, and up to
Speaker 3: a quarter million dollars once again, he only has to
Speaker 3: pay thirty nine thousand dollars and he will serve five
Speaker 3: years of supervised release after his time in prison. He
Speaker 3: got those lifetime supervised Like that's how it's supposed to go.
Speaker 1: He got the the he got a slap on the hand.
Speaker 3: As far as this goes, he got the least amount
Speaker 3: that he could have got, and we move on to
Speaker 3: the next one. Radnor Township commissioner resigns from board amid
Speaker 3: child porn charges. Radnar Township in Pennsylvania, a Delaware County
Speaker 3: commissioner faces child porn charges, has resigned. On Monday, CBS
Speaker 3: three learned Radnar Township board Commissioner President Philip R. Was
Speaker 3: arrested last month on several counts of chop pornography, possession
Speaker 3: and distribution charges for images that depict children as infants
Speaker 3: engaged in sex acts with adults. On Monday, are resigned
Speaker 3: as commissioner, effective immediately, and stepped down as president last month.
Speaker 3: Investigators say are uploaded and shared images of suspected child
Speaker 3: pornography through a Yahoo Messenger account. According to police, are
Speaker 3: used Yahu Messenger to quote unquote sext with unknown individuals which.
Speaker 1: Involved sexual talk about children.
Speaker 3: The investigation began after yah Yahoo flagged the messages. We
Speaker 3: charged him with multiple council child pornography, said Delaware County
Speaker 3: District Attorney Jack Wellin. According to the criminal complaint, are
Speaker 3: use names like Daddy X and Daddy x X to
Speaker 3: visit chat rooms and cater to pedophiles. He sent and
Speaker 3: received images of children, some two to four years old.
Speaker 2: Fry am done, You're dead.
Speaker 3: He told detectives that he had been sexting online with
Speaker 3: people and that the purpose of the chats was sexual
Speaker 3: in nature. Radnor residents are safe. The Radnor residents are safe.
Speaker 3: It is everybody's responsibility to keep our children safe, said
Speaker 3: the police superintendent said. Radnor County is right outside of Philly.
Speaker 1: I just looked it up.
Speaker 2: I was curious about, like what part of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, dude.
Speaker 3: So police say that our told detectives that during one
Speaker 3: of these conversations, an unknown person sent him about one
Speaker 3: dozen child pornography images of girls who are estimated to
Speaker 3: be approximately thirteen years old. Some of the images involved
Speaker 3: female children engaging sex with adult males, and said investigators.
Speaker 3: Detectives say they found multiple chat logs between our and
Speaker 3: individuals dating back to twenty thirteen, in which are shared
Speaker 3: and sought graphic images and videos of children in sexual positions,
Speaker 3: bondage and engaged in acts of adults.
Speaker 1: According to investigators.
Speaker 3: To ours, collection was mainly comprised of prepe beesting girls
Speaker 3: under the age of ten, but also included infants and toddlers.
Speaker 3: Police say a portion of the images and videos depicted
Speaker 3: satomastochistic sexual abuse and children being sexually abused by animals.
Speaker 3: In October, the sixty six year old was charged with
Speaker 3: the possession and the distribution sexual abuse of children and
Speaker 3: criminal use of communication facility, all third degree felonies.
Speaker 2: Oh man, this fucking turns my stomach.
Speaker 3: Dude, I agree, let's go a little off, but still
Speaker 3: on the same conversation. Is it true that a BLM member,
Speaker 3: Charles Wade was arrested?
Speaker 1: Leader? Yeah, a leader?
Speaker 3: Excuse me, people are asking, was a prominent Black Lives
Speaker 3: Matter activist Charles Wade arrested for human trafficking? Charles Wade's
Speaker 3: act was actually a very well known activist with the
Speaker 3: BLM in Ferguson and Baltimore areas until twenty sixteen. With
Speaker 3: protests against racial injustice picking up steam recently, his name
Speaker 3: has cropped up again in social media discourse.
Speaker 1: About the BLM movement. So what happened?
Speaker 3: Wade was accused of prostituting a minor and was reportedly arrested.
Speaker 3: His association with a nationwide social movement has many questioning
Speaker 3: if all this is true? Was Charles Wade really arrested.
Speaker 3: Here's what you need to know about him. In May,
Speaker 3: at twenty sixteen, he was arrested in Prince George County,
Speaker 3: Maryland and charged with prostitution and human trafficking acorner authorities.
Speaker 3: Wade allegedly placed online ads offering meetups with a seventeen
Speaker 3: year old girl. An undercover officer reportedly responded to the
Speaker 3: ad and met with the minor girl in a sting operation.
Speaker 3: The girl said that Wade was her quote unquote manager.
Speaker 1: Bro sitting out a seventeen year old girl.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, and that likes. He has admitted guilt on this.
Speaker 3: It's understood. He was arrested. He is seeing jail time
Speaker 3: for this. But you think the seventeen year old was
Speaker 3: the only one. That's just the only one he was caught.
Speaker 2: Did it say the seventeen year old girl's name?
Speaker 3: No, No, they're they're not going to release victims' names
Speaker 3: like that, No way.
Speaker 2: Okay, just wondering if she was black, Just curiosity for
Speaker 2: the for the irony of all of it.
Speaker 3: I'm just gonna say probably probably Prince George County, Maryland,
Speaker 3: and he's your boys in Baltimore and all of that like,
Speaker 3: that's why I was out of DC.
Speaker 1: So, I mean, yeah, one hundred percent.
Speaker 2: I mean at least it was. I mean, seventeen is
Speaker 2: obviously wrong. But it's not two to four years old,
Speaker 2: you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: It's still so the belief that that's the only one
Speaker 3: that he was caught with. Dude, Nobody just wakes up
Speaker 3: one day and decides, you know what, you're almost legal.
Speaker 3: Let's see if we can make some money off of you.
Speaker 3: That's not how the thought process goes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, most time you catch somebody, it's never their first
Speaker 2: time exactly.
Speaker 1: So now we're going to another one case.
Speaker 3: A former attorney convicted of human trafficking under review by
Speaker 3: Bexer County District Attorney's Conviction Integrity Unit, Mark Benavidez. He
Speaker 3: for the record, he was an attorney for the Democratic
Speaker 3: Party in Texas, Okay. He is serving eighty year prison
Speaker 3: term in wait, I'm sorry, serving eighty year prison term
Speaker 3: and sex for legal services scandal.
Speaker 1: Let's dive in eighty San Antonio. M'll take eight one years.
Speaker 1: That five year bullshit is for the birds. I fully agree.
Speaker 3: He was actually convicted on six counts of human trafficking
Speaker 3: in twenty eighteen. Yeah, so he's serving an eighty year
Speaker 3: prison term for trading his legal services for sex. His
Speaker 3: case is still under review by the Bexer County District
Speaker 3: Attorney's office. According to testimony during his trial, Benevedez would
Speaker 3: trade his legal representation for sex from at least six clients.
Speaker 3: He would make video recordings of the sexual trysts the
Speaker 3: women testified. We are looking into not just those incidents
Speaker 3: that were recorded, not just the videos he made and
Speaker 3: the documentation he made, but anyone who might have been affected,
Speaker 3: the Assistant Attorney General Matthew Howard said. Howard is the
Speaker 3: head of the Bexer or Bexer County District Attorney Joe
Speaker 3: Gonzalez's Conviction Integrity unit. Was this division or what the
Speaker 3: division does is it grades our paper to make sure
Speaker 3: that these convictions have integrity. In the ben and Videz case,
Speaker 3: the unit is reviewing the cases of his clients who
Speaker 3: testified in any other women who may have been represented
Speaker 3: by Ben and Videz as and we're also victims. Because
Speaker 3: they only know of six, that doesn't mean that's the
Speaker 3: only ones. Again, no one wakes up one day and
Speaker 3: decides he's gonna start trading his you know, sex for
Speaker 3: work like that.
Speaker 2: But okay, yeah, I mean it's something that usually starts
Speaker 2: way earlier, and they have to gather a lot of information,
Speaker 2: and you know, most of these people they do it
Speaker 2: on the slick, right, like you have to.
Speaker 1: It's a slick kind of business.
Speaker 2: And obviously it's it's one that is still going on
Speaker 2: and probably will go on for you know, the rest
Speaker 2: of human goes right like, because there's always going to
Speaker 2: be sick minded individuals. Now whether they were themselves also
Speaker 2: victims of it as children. Most of the time that
Speaker 2: is the case, but that's not an excuse.
Speaker 1: I don't care.
Speaker 2: I mean, at that point, you know, if you're having
Speaker 2: some kind of thoughts like that because of your you know,
Speaker 2: the things that victimized you whenever you were young, you
Speaker 2: need to fucking go tell somebody you need to have
Speaker 2: therapy for that or something. You can't just act upon
Speaker 2: that kind of shit, and you're not breaking the cycle
Speaker 2: at all, you know, like you're perpetuating the cycle.
Speaker 1: Now let's go to another one here.
Speaker 3: Now, this is based upon a social media post and
Speaker 3: your boy, the one in question, tried saying that this
Speaker 3: was character defamation tried counter suing, a judge rules social
Speaker 3: media post made about Joe Morrissey was overwhelmingly.
Speaker 1: True direct quote here we go.
Speaker 3: A judge ruled on Whins that social media posts claiming
Speaker 3: former Virginia State Senator Jim Morrissey was a violent thug,
Speaker 3: a liar, and a sexual predator was made on a
Speaker 3: factual basis. According to documents obtained by a news A
Speaker 3: judge ruled on Wednesday that the evidence showed overwhelmingly that
Speaker 3: social media posts made by Jimmy Lee Jarvis about former
Speaker 3: Virginia State senator was true. In a one million dollar
Speaker 3: defamation suit originally filed by Morrissey, So somebody being a
Speaker 3: hater online, he said, no, you're you're throwing too much shade.
Speaker 3: I'm suing you. The judge was like, no, he's saying
Speaker 3: some very true things about you actually, so no, let's
Speaker 3: go deeper. The defamation suit stems from an alleged January fourteen,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty two, post on x formerly Twitter, in which
Speaker 3: Jarvis said Joe Morrisey is a violent thug, a liar,
Speaker 3: and a sexual predator. According to the document, the statements
Speaker 3: were reportedly made when Morrisey was a sitting state senator
Speaker 3: running for re election. After Morrissey followed the filed the suit,
Speaker 3: Jarvis filed a countersuit evidence in an effort to prove
Speaker 3: his statement was not defamatory, and requested an award of
Speaker 3: attorney's fees under the Virginia Code eight point zero two
Speaker 3: TAC two three three point two in the motion for
Speaker 3: summary judgment excuse me. In the motion for summary judgment,
Speaker 3: Morrisey was said to have admitted the authenticity of several
Speaker 3: public news reports and documents that would reportedly validate the
Speaker 3: comments made by Jarvis, some of which eight News has
Speaker 3: detailed below.
Speaker 1: So here we go.
Speaker 3: I'm not worried about him with the violent thug thing. Fine,
Speaker 3: he says, I'm going to kill you. I'm going to
Speaker 3: beat your head in. Morrisey said that in ninety nine.
Speaker 3: All right, fine, fine, keep in mind he's going up
Speaker 3: for reelection and your boy Jarvis is like, no, here's
Speaker 3: what I have against you. You really need to step away.
Speaker 3: The judge is saying, no, you really fucking need to
Speaker 3: step away now, as far as the documents provided for
Speaker 3: sexual predator claim. Additionally, the documents reported by Morrissey was indicted.
Speaker 3: On June thirtieth, twenty fourteen, on felony charges of indecent
Speaker 3: liberties with a minor, possession and distribution child pornography, and
Speaker 3: electronic solicitation of a minor. The charges were made after
Speaker 3: police reportedly found Morrissey in his hen Rico County home
Speaker 3: with a seventeen year old girl. That girl would later
Speaker 3: become his wife, but at the time August twenty thirteen,
Speaker 3: was an employee.
Speaker 1: Of his law office WOW.
Speaker 3: According to the document, Morrisey served three months or yeah
Speaker 3: three months of a twelve month sentence and resigned as
Speaker 3: a delegate at Virginia House after the conviction. According to
Speaker 3: the report the Richmond Times Dispatch referenced into the document,
Speaker 3: a Henrico County judge allowed a woman formerly represented by
Speaker 3: Joe Morrissey's law firm to withdraw a guilty plea amid
Speaker 3: allegations that he pressured her for sex. The report said,
Speaker 3: Morrisey allegedly exposed himself to the woman in his law
Speaker 3: office and continued making advances through text message. According to
Speaker 3: Richmond Times Dispatch, when the woman repeatedly refused Morrissey, she
Speaker 3: said he handed over the case to another lawyer in
Speaker 3: his office who pushed her into taking a plea deal. Okay,
Speaker 3: so once again, this guy who was absolutely a member
Speaker 3: of the Virginia I want to make sure I'm not
Speaker 3: speaking on a turn a Virginia State senator. Clearly he
Speaker 3: was a raging piece of shit and could be confirmed.
Speaker 3: And then when someone tried to bring that to light,
Speaker 3: he tried countersuing them for defamation to the tune of
Speaker 3: one million dollars. The judge of whenever you're Jarvis, the
Speaker 3: guy who was bringing up these cases, could bring all
Speaker 3: of this documentation to show that, no, the post that
Speaker 3: I made on x wasn't defamatory. I'm speaking hard facts here,
Speaker 3: And the judge said, oh no, he is speaking hard facts.
Speaker 1: Speaking on business.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, uh.
Speaker 2: It's another disgusting example of these people that are trying
Speaker 2: to bring these Epstein files to light. It seems that
Speaker 2: they're just only doing it not to help the individuals
Speaker 2: who were victimized as a result, not to sound the
Speaker 2: alarm of every single person involved with with Epstein's shenanigans,
Speaker 2: but just to specifically target Trump. Now I'm not saying
Speaker 2: that Trump, you know, look, if he's if he's involved
Speaker 2: in any of that shit.
Speaker 1: I mean, if he got.
Speaker 2: Any kind of pictures, if he is trying to shield
Speaker 2: certain people from being convicted, You're done. Like, I don't
Speaker 2: care how how good you do for the country. I
Speaker 2: don't care how much debt you get us out of.
Speaker 2: I don't care if you even take away the fucking
Speaker 2: I r rest. If you are involved on this shit,
Speaker 2: you need to get fried. It needs to be a
Speaker 2: public execution. That being said, these people that are trying
Speaker 2: to bring all this shit to light are only doing
Speaker 2: it to fry him. They're not worried about, you know,
Speaker 2: standing on on goodness, or worried about anybody any of
Speaker 2: the victims.
Speaker 1: They're doing it for one reason. Agreed.
Speaker 3: And further this point, have you ever heard the name
Speaker 3: Jerry Studs real quick?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. You probably not? Probably not.
Speaker 3: He was the first openly gay dude in Washington, d C.
Speaker 3: Which was seen as like he was a hero from
Speaker 3: the LGBTQ ELEMENTO P plus exclamation points, star asterisk, hashtag community. Right,
Speaker 3: And they have gone on and on to champion this guy, except.
Speaker 1: For the fact that now they have to eat crow.
Speaker 3: I was gonna say eat Dick, but some of them
Speaker 3: like that shit today would have to eat crow on
Speaker 3: this one, because now it's understood that he was a
Speaker 3: guaranteed sexual predator who was after underage boys.
Speaker 1: While he was working in DC. Shocker.
Speaker 3: It's beyond dispute that the late Massachusetts Congressman Jerry Studds
Speaker 3: was a sexual predator, and now, thanks to a lawsuit
Speaker 3: file last week, even more details about his unspeakable behavior
Speaker 3: around young boys are on public record. In nineteen eighty three,
Speaker 3: Studs was censored by the House Representatives in a four
Speaker 3: to twenty to three vote after he piled or excuse me,
Speaker 3: after he applied applied rather a seventeen year old male
Speaker 3: congressional page with vodka and then sodomized him. In some
Speaker 3: states it would have been statutory rape. In Massachusetts, Studd
Speaker 3: was easily re elected six times. Studs felt no shame
Speaker 3: as the x rayed details of his sort of conduct
Speaker 3: were read into the record on the floor of the House,
Speaker 3: and he turned his back on his colleagues. Before his
Speaker 3: election in Congress in nineteen seventy two, Studs was a teacher,
Speaker 3: a quote unquote master at Saint Paul's School in Concord,
Speaker 3: New Hampshire, talk about elite. It's the alma mater of
Speaker 3: both John Forbes Kerry and Robert Mueller class of sixty one.
Speaker 3: Last week, the two alumni phil filed a twenty two
Speaker 3: page lawsuit in New Hampshire against the prep school, claiming
Speaker 3: it was a haven for sexual predators, one of whom
Speaker 3: was identified as the future representative Jerry Studds, a Democrat
Speaker 3: from Massachusetts. The allegations against the gay icon, who died
Speaker 3: in two thousand and six at the age of sixty nine,
Speaker 3: are made by Keith Biff mittauver mithover. I don't know
Speaker 3: who attended the school from sixty six to seventy when
Speaker 3: it was all male. Biff, Yeah, Biff, right, Keith gets
Speaker 3: shortened to Biff, but I.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just you know, coincidental that we mentioned Biff
Speaker 2: earlier this episode, and there's a fucking guy named Biff.
Speaker 1: Anyway. Yeah, long story short.
Speaker 3: They go into some details about the sexual misconduct of
Speaker 3: stugs with this boy when they were when he was
Speaker 3: a teacher at this school.
Speaker 1: Long story short.
Speaker 3: This guy who was championed by the left and championed by.
Speaker 1: The gay community for being what he was, come.
Speaker 3: To find out start to finish, was a disgusting child predator.
Speaker 3: So again, this is the same party that's trying to
Speaker 3: do some virtue signaling things right now and throw out
Speaker 3: Trump here.
Speaker 1: This is a little bit more recent. Former Stillwater mayor
Speaker 1: sentenced to prison. Saratoga County District Attorney Karen A. Hagen
Speaker 1: announced that Ricky Nelson from Saint John's Place, still Water,
Speaker 1: New York, was sentenced today by Sarah Tooga count Court
Speaker 1: to an aggregate total of five to fifteen years for
Speaker 1: his conviction in the five separate counts of possessing a
Speaker 1: sexual performance of a child class ethelonies in violation with
Speaker 1: the New York State Penal Law. Judge Murphy imposed sentences
Speaker 1: of one to three years for each of the five
Speaker 1: charges of possessing the sexual performance of a child to
Speaker 1: run consecutive to each other. Nelson will be required to
Speaker 1: register as a child sex offender of course upon release
Speaker 1: from prison. Nelson pled guilty in April when he admitted
Speaker 1: in court to knowingly having his possession and control in
Speaker 1: too knowing accessing with intent to view images containing the
Speaker 1: sexual conduct of a child of less than sixteen years
Speaker 1: of age during August of twenty seventeen.
Speaker 3: In the town of Stillwater. Nelson affirmed this conduct and
Speaker 3: his guilty plead today before Judge Murphy. Prior to sentencing.
Speaker 3: Nelson acknowledges his crimes and apologizes for his conduct. Nothing
Speaker 3: that he recognized, noting that he recognized the pain paled
Speaker 3: in comparison to the pain of his victims. Okay, just
Speaker 3: so we're clear here, the materials were of children under
Speaker 3: the age of four. I should mention that one. Now,
Speaker 3: this one is another really disgusting one. Former Hubbard Mayor
Speaker 3: Richard Keenan receives life sentence for child rape. We are
Speaker 3: not going to get into the nitty gritty of this one,
Speaker 3: but what I will say is that I'll read just
Speaker 3: these first couple of lines. It's a long thing, and
Speaker 3: it gets worse the more you reap. Former Hubbard Mayor
Speaker 3: Richard Keenan, who is a loud and proud Democrat, I
Speaker 3: might add, receives life in prison for raping a four
Speaker 3: year old girl over a period of two years. Sixty
Speaker 3: six year old Keenan appeared for sentencing on Monday before
Speaker 3: Judge Peter Kantess in Trumbull County Common Police Court. Long
Speaker 3: story short. He also played guilty like he acknowledged that
Speaker 3: this is would happened. But the worst part about this
Speaker 3: piece of ship is that he tried saying that she
Speaker 3: was a willing participant, that she led him on, she
Speaker 3: wanted this from him.
Speaker 2: It was a four year old that he had been
Speaker 2: doing it to for two years, so it started whenever
Speaker 2: she was two. That is you, what is willing of
Speaker 2: a two year.
Speaker 1: Old according to this And again I'm not going to
Speaker 1: read it.
Speaker 3: I'm not If anybody wants to go look into this
Speaker 3: piece of shit, be my guest. My blood can only
Speaker 3: boil so much, right, And we do, in fact have
Speaker 3: a show that we're trying to record here.
Speaker 1: But this guy legitimately tried to.
Speaker 3: Make the case that it was a happy scenario that
Speaker 3: this girl wanted it, provoked him, guided him all he
Speaker 3: was sixty six.
Speaker 2: What a fucking delusional piece of shit to even think that.
Speaker 2: And you know that's the thing is that bad guys
Speaker 2: never think that they're bad. You ever noticed that, Like
Speaker 2: they always think that they're like they're doing good, or
Speaker 2: they're doing the right thing, or what they're doing isn't
Speaker 2: really causing harm.
Speaker 1: Their delusion, knowl dude.
Speaker 3: They are psychopaths that need like death is too good
Speaker 3: for them in my personal opinion. But all right, that
Speaker 3: being said, now we get to this list, and as
Speaker 3: I have been going on to a good tangent here
Speaker 3: about these Democrat pieces of shit, this is a list,
Speaker 3: and we're not gonna read the inner the you know,
Speaker 3: the ins and outs of all of it. But I
Speaker 3: do want to go down and read these people and
Speaker 3: what was done. Some of them we have mentioned, some
Speaker 3: of them we have not. I will say that of
Speaker 3: this list, the majority are Democrats, but there is still
Speaker 3: forty one Republican names on this list that we are
Speaker 3: about to go over.
Speaker 1: My god.
Speaker 2: Democratic Illinois state Representative Keith Farnham has resigned and was
Speaker 2: charged with possession of child pornography and has been accused
Speaker 2: of bragging at an online site about sexually molesting a
Speaker 2: six year old girl.
Speaker 1: Democrat about him, yep.
Speaker 2: Democratic spokesperson for the Arkansas Democratic Party, Harold Moody Junior
Speaker 2: was charged with distribution and possession of child pornography, which
Speaker 2: we'd read. Democratic Radner Township Board of Commissioners member Philip
Speaker 2: r resigned from his position after being charged with possession
Speaker 2: of child pornography and abusing children between two and six
Speaker 2: years old read about him. Democratic activist and BLM organizer
Speaker 2: Charles Wade was arrested and charged with human trafficking and
Speaker 2: underage prostitution YEP. Democratic Texas attorney and activist Mark Benevetez
Speaker 2: was charged with having sex with a minoring, inducing a
Speaker 2: child under eighteen to have sex, and compelling prostitution of
Speaker 2: at least nine of at least nine legal clients, and
Speaker 2: possession of child pornography. He was also found guilty on
Speaker 2: six counts of sex trafficking. Democratic Virginia delegate Joe Morrissey
Speaker 2: was indicted on charges connected to his relationship with a
Speaker 2: seventeen year old girl and charged with supervisory and decent
Speaker 2: liberties with a minor, electronic solicitation of a minor, possession
Speaker 2: of child pornography, and distribution of child pornography. Democratic Massachusetts
Speaker 2: Congressman Jerry Studs was censured by the House of Representatives
Speaker 2: after he admitted to an inappropriate relationship with a seventeen
Speaker 2: year old page. Democratic former mayor of Stillwater, New York,
Speaker 2: Rick Nelson was pled guilty to five council possession of
Speaker 2: child pornography of children less than the age of sixteen.
Speaker 2: Democratic former mayor of Clayton, New York, Dale Kenyon was
Speaker 2: indicted for sexual acts against a teenager. Democratic former mayor
Speaker 2: of Hubbard, Ohio, Richard Keenan was given a life sentence
Speaker 2: in jail for ripping a four year old girl. Democratic
Speaker 2: former mayor of Winston, Oregon Kenneth Barrett was arrested for
Speaker 2: setting up a meeting to have sex with a fourteen
Speaker 2: year old girl who turned out to be a police officer.
Speaker 2: Democratic former mayor of Randolph, Nebraska, Dwayne L. Shutt was
Speaker 2: arrested in charge with four counts of felony with third
Speaker 2: degree sexual assault of a child and one count of
Speaker 2: intentional child abuse. How's I feel like it's all intentional?
Speaker 2: I don't even know why they gotta say that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but it's like, well, whenever you're saying like, uh,
Speaker 3: I don't know, right, what is is it?
Speaker 2: Like a first degree, second degree, third degree type of thing?
Speaker 3: It says third degree sexual assault, but I don't understand
Speaker 3: what is the difference between a first, second and third degree?
Speaker 3: And then what's the difference between like unintentional child abuse?
Speaker 1: I don't understand what that is. That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Each state has their own legal precedence and like levels
Speaker 3: to crime, and that's how they can assign what kind
Speaker 3: of punishment should be doled out.
Speaker 2: But either way, maybe not pre planned. Maybe it was
Speaker 2: just like there's certain things that are planned ahead of time,
Speaker 2: and then there's certain things that maybe just happened in
Speaker 2: the moment that weren't, you know, premeditated.
Speaker 3: Maybe I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think it should all just be considered
Speaker 2: fucking rape, but it is, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: But next one we have Democratic former mayor of Dawson, Georgia,
Speaker 2: Christopher Wright was indicted on the charges of aggravated child molestation,
Speaker 2: aggravated sodomy, rape, child molestation, and statutory rape of an
Speaker 2: eleven year old boy and twelve year old girl. Democratic
Speaker 2: former mayor of Stockton, California, Anthony Silva was charged with
Speaker 2: providing alcohol to young adults during a game of strip
Speaker 2: poker that included a sixteen year old boy at a
Speaker 2: camp for underprivileged children run by the mayor. Wow, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that is sick. Democratic former mayor of Millbrook, New York,
Speaker 2: Donald Briggs was arrested in charge with inappropriate sexual contact
Speaker 2: with a person younger than seventeen, Democratic Party leader for
Speaker 2: Victoria County, Texas, Stephen Jabour pled guilty to possession and
Speaker 2: receiving over half a million child pornographic images. Half a
Speaker 2: party leader in Texas Wow Democratic activists and fundraiser Terrence
Speaker 2: Bean was arrested on charge of sonomy and sex abuse
Speaker 2: and a case involving a fifteen year old boy, and
Speaker 2: when the alleged victim declined to testify, the judge dismissed
Speaker 2: the case.
Speaker 1: YEP.
Speaker 2: Democratic Party chairman for Davidson County, Tennessee, Rodney Mullen, not
Speaker 2: to be confused with the skater, resigned amid child pornography allegations.
Speaker 3: So he just resigned before the truth came out because
Speaker 3: he knew how bad it was about to get, so
Speaker 3: he just dipped.
Speaker 2: Democratic activists Andrew Douglas Reid pleaded guilty to to a
Speaker 2: multiple counts of second degree sexual exploitation of a minor
Speaker 2: for producing child pornography. Democratic official from Tara HoTT, Indiana,
Speaker 2: David Roberts was sentenced to federal prison for producing and
Speaker 2: possessing child pornography, including placing hidden cameras in the bedrooms
Speaker 2: and bathrooms at a home that he shared with two
Speaker 2: minor female victims.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: Democratic California Congressman Tony kred is being venus, I don't know,
Speaker 2: is being sued in La County for allegedly sexually abusing
Speaker 2: a sixteen year old girl. Democratic aide to Senator Barbara
Speaker 2: Boxer Jeff Rizzatto pled guilty to charges of trading in
Speaker 2: child pornography. Democratic Alaska State representative Alaska never gets a
Speaker 2: call out, not really, this is not one to be
Speaker 2: proud of. But Dean Westlake resigned from his seat after
Speaker 2: the media published a report alleging he fathered a child
Speaker 2: with a sixteen year old girl when he was twenty eight.
Speaker 3: Damn, that's that's kind of a hard claim to side step,
Speaker 3: but all right.
Speaker 2: Democratic New Jersey State Assemblyman Neil Cohen was convicted of
Speaker 2: possession and distribution of child pornography.
Speaker 3: Republican real quick, real quick, real quick. So that was
Speaker 3: all the Democrats, and they do have more at the bottom.
Speaker 3: That gets back to the Democrats side of things.
Speaker 2: Huh.
Speaker 3: But I did want to make a mention of this, right,
Speaker 3: I am being fair and balanced to all the good
Speaker 3: cult members.
Speaker 6: I know.
Speaker 1: I've been shitting on Democrats a good bit here.
Speaker 3: But let's also not sidestep the fact that Republicans are
Speaker 3: equally guilty when it comes to this disgusting activity.
Speaker 1: Ooh, this one's hard.
Speaker 2: Republican Tim Nolan, chairman of Donald Trump's presidential campaign Kentucky,
Speaker 2: in Kentucky, pled guilty to child sex trafficking on and
Speaker 2: on February eleven, twenty eighteen. He was sentenced to serve
Speaker 2: twenty years in prison. Republican state Senator Ralph Shorty was
Speaker 2: indicted on four counts of human trafficking and child pornography
Speaker 2: in November twenty seventeen. He pled He pleaded guilty to
Speaker 2: one count of child sex trafficking in exchange for the
Speaker 2: dropping of the other charges. Republican anti abortion activist Howard
Speaker 2: Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's insane that you would be an anti abortion activist. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you're the like you're doing the thing that like most
Speaker 2: people bring up as for abortion, whether it be incest
Speaker 2: or rape.
Speaker 1: See, that's the thing.
Speaker 3: He's all like, listen, I don't want to kill them
Speaker 3: babies while they're still in the wound. That's fucking crazy. However,
Speaker 3: like once they're born. Yeah, no, welcome.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a piece of shit.
Speaker 2: Republican County commissioner David Schwartz pleaded guilty to molesting two
Speaker 2: girls under the age of eleven. It was sentenced to
Speaker 2: eight years in prison. Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no
Speaker 2: contest of fondling a ten year old girl and was
Speaker 2: sentenced to ten years probation.
Speaker 1: Not even Joe.
Speaker 2: Republican anti abortion activist Nicholas Morenci pleaded guilty to possessing
Speaker 2: child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to
Speaker 2: anyone who murders an abortion doctor.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I'm an anti abortion activist.
Speaker 1: Cool.
Speaker 3: Cool, you're inciting violence, right, You're essentially putting out a
Speaker 3: hit on any abortion doctor. Meanwhile, you played guilty too,
Speaker 3: you possessing child porn. I mean what, I'm not saying
Speaker 3: that one negates the other. Whatever, But also, like, bro.
Speaker 2: What the fuck these fucking people, dude. Republican legislator Edison
Speaker 2: Mizla Aldrondo was sentenced to ten years in prison for
Speaker 2: raping his daughter between the ages of nine and seventeen.
Speaker 2: That actually happens a lot more than most people. Realize
Speaker 2: look at Joe Biden and his daughter and his niece.
Speaker 1: YEP.
Speaker 2: Republican mayor Philip Jordano is serving serving a thirty seven
Speaker 2: year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing.
Speaker 1: Eight and ten year old girls. YEP.
Speaker 2: Republican campaign consultant Tom short Ridge was sentenced to three
Speaker 2: years probation for taking nude photographs of a fifteen year
Speaker 2: old girl. This probation, shit, what the fuck?
Speaker 6: Man?
Speaker 1: Send him to jail, burn him alive.
Speaker 3: And I no, no, I'm with you, and I'm not
Speaker 3: trying to dismiss it, but we have read some very
Speaker 3: heinous thing thus far. Your boy took pictures of a
Speaker 3: fifteen year old. And I'm not saying, well, that's not
Speaker 3: so bad. No, no, no, it is bad. It is
Speaker 3: absolutely bad. It's not as bad as the dude who
Speaker 3: raped a four year old and claimed that she wanted it.
Speaker 2: You said there's levels too, the l I'm not but
Speaker 2: even still probation with you? Probation No like fuck that
Speaker 2: Republican Senator strom Thurman. Oh, we brought him up. A
Speaker 2: notable racist had sex with a fifteen year old black
Speaker 2: girl which produced a child.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was a weird case, right, So like he
Speaker 3: is a devout racist on the mic, but he's also
Speaker 3: got a half half you know, half white, half black
Speaker 3: baby with a fifteen year old girl. So like, yeah, no,
Speaker 3: this is one of the things that happens.
Speaker 2: H Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended
Speaker 2: during the twenty During the two thousand and four presidential
Speaker 2: Campaig surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair
Speaker 2: with a female juvenile. Indeed, Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded
Speaker 2: no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a thirteen
Speaker 2: year old girl. Republican Congressman Donald buzz Lukens was found
Speaker 2: guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced
Speaker 2: to one month in.
Speaker 3: Jail on one month, one month after being he pled guilty.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Republican fundraiser Richard A. Del Guadio was found guilty of
Speaker 2: child born charges and paying two teenage girls to pose
Speaker 2: for sexual photos. Republican activist Mark A. Grethin convicted on
Speaker 2: six counts of sex crimes involving children. Republican activists Randall
Speaker 2: David and Kenny pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on
Speaker 2: a child. Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a
Speaker 2: female minor working as a congressional page. Republican activist and
Speaker 2: Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship
Speaker 2: with his stepdaughter.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 3: Now, Christian Coalition leader begetting down on that step daughter?
Speaker 1: What the fuck?
Speaker 2: Republican congressman an anti gay activist Robert Bowman was charged
Speaker 2: with having sex with a sixteen year old boy he
Speaker 2: picked up at a gay bar. Republican Committee chairman Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Patty was arrested for distributing a video clip of a
Speaker 2: five year old girl being raped.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what the fuck man.
Speaker 2: Republican activist Marty Glickman aka Republican Marty, was taken into
Speaker 2: custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual
Speaker 2: activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering
Speaker 2: the drug LSD.
Speaker 9: Yeah, Republican Marty, massive piece of shit. Yeah, that's that's
Speaker 9: some Bill Cosby shit right there. Republican legislative aide Howard L.
Speaker 9: Brooks was charged with molesting a twelve year old boy
Speaker 9: in possession of child pornography. Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway
Speaker 9: was accused of having sex with a twelve year old
Speaker 9: babysitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported
Speaker 9: in the media. Republican preacher Stephen Stephen White, who demanded
Speaker 9: a return to traditional values, was sentenced to jail after
Speaker 9: offering twenty dollars to a fourteen year old boy for
Speaker 9: permission to perform oral sex on him.
Speaker 3: Now, that's a weird one, right, And yes, he's disgusting
Speaker 3: in all things, frying a lot, but like he's a
Speaker 3: pastor who tried paying a fourteen year old twenty bucks
Speaker 3: to let him blow the fourteen year old what the fuck?
Speaker 1: Yep not shocking.
Speaker 2: Republican talk show host John Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing
Speaker 2: his genitals to an eleven year old girl. Republican anti
Speaker 2: anti gay activist Earl Butch Cameron was sentenced to forty
Speaker 2: years in prison for molesting an eight year old girl
Speaker 2: after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
Speaker 2: I remember reading that one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, buddy.
Speaker 2: Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts
Speaker 2: of raping his daughters and served fourteen years in federal prison,
Speaker 2: six counts of raping both daughters and you'll only get
Speaker 2: fourteen years.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Republican election board official Kevin Cohne was sentenced to two
Speaker 2: years probation for soliciting sex over the Internet from a
Speaker 2: fourteen year old girl. A Republican politician Andrew Burr was
Speaker 2: charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a
Speaker 2: thirteen year old boy. Republican politician Keith west Moreland was
Speaker 2: arrested on seven felony counts of leude. And why do
Speaker 2: you say that word? Labitious lascivious exhibition to girls under
Speaker 2: the age of sixteen, I e. Exposing himself to children.
Speaker 2: Republican anti abortion activist John allen Burt was charged with
Speaker 2: sexual conduct involving a fifteen year old girl. Republican county
Speaker 2: councilman Keola Child's pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
Speaker 2: Oh I remember that, Yeah, the child's molesting a child.
Speaker 2: Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault
Speaker 2: on a teenage girl. Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to
Speaker 2: molesting his two daughters.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: Republican councilman and former marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted
Speaker 2: of molesting a thirteen year old girl. Republican County Commissioner
Speaker 2: Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and
Speaker 2: assault on a teenage boy. Republican County councilman Fred C.
Speaker 2: Smeltzer Junior pleaded no contest to raping a fifteen year
Speaker 2: old girl and served six months in prison.
Speaker 1: Six months.
Speaker 2: Right, that'll teach him. Republican activist Parker Jay Benna pleaded
Speaker 2: guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer
Speaker 2: and was sentenced to thirty months in federal prison and
Speaker 2: fined eighteen thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Not even three years, not even three years, but all right,
Speaker 1: oh Man.
Speaker 2: Republican Parole Board officer in Former Colorado state representative Larry
Speaker 2: Jack Schwartz was fired after child pornography was found in
Speaker 2: his possession. Republican strategists and Citadel Military College graduate Robin
Speaker 2: Vanderwahl was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting
Speaker 2: sex from boys and girls over the internet. Republican city
Speaker 2: councilman Mark Harris, who described who is described as a
Speaker 2: good military man and churchgoer, was convicted of repeatedly having
Speaker 2: sex with an eleven year old girl in sentenced to
Speaker 2: twelve years in prison. Yeah, Republican businessman John Grunsyth withdrew
Speaker 2: his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegation service that he
Speaker 2: went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including
Speaker 2: his daughter.
Speaker 3: The fuck kind of skinning dip bullshit is this?
Speaker 2: Republican director of the Young Republican Federation, Nicholas Alessando molested
Speaker 2: his six year old daughter and was sentenced to six
Speaker 2: years in prison. I wonder if there's any relation to
Speaker 2: lou Elezondo.
Speaker 1: I hope not.
Speaker 2: But you know, Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A.
Speaker 2: Daizen Senior, was charged with rape for allegedly paying a
Speaker 2: fifteen year old girl for sex. Dazen, who was sixty
Speaker 2: two at the time, who is married with grown children
Speaker 2: and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the
Speaker 2: past decade he paid more than one million dollars to
Speaker 2: have sex with a large number of young women.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So, just so we're all clear here, we're about to
Speaker 3: get back on the Democrat Party and start shitting.
Speaker 1: On them some more.
Speaker 3: But I wanted to be understood that we are not,
Speaker 3: you know, super overhere riding Trump's dick. We're not just
Speaker 3: saying that the Democrats are full of evil. I am
Speaker 3: saying that all parties, all political parties, have massive, massive
Speaker 3: amounts of shit bags in them at the local level,
Speaker 3: the state level, the federal level, and there's no way
Speaker 3: of getting around that. But with that being said, the
Speaker 3: Democrats are back on this. Oh well, we're the ones
Speaker 3: that are trying to release the information. We're the only
Speaker 3: ones that care about the victims. It's the Democratic Republicans
Speaker 3: are the evil ones. They're the ones that are involved
Speaker 3: with Epstein and now do Unfortunately, that's not true, though
Speaker 3: I would actually argue to say that.
Speaker 1: I would.
Speaker 3: I'm hoping that it's a fifty to fifty split on
Speaker 3: the Epstein list, but I have my own personal belief
Speaker 3: that it's probably not because, again, we just listed over
Speaker 3: forty Republican names.
Speaker 1: This list is.
Speaker 3: Over one hundred and twenty names long, and the vast
Speaker 3: majority are Democrat.
Speaker 2: Democratic donor and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein ran an underage child
Speaker 2: sex brothel and was convicted of soliciting underage girls for prostitution.
Speaker 2: Democratic New York Congressman Anthony Wiener pleaded guilty to transferring
Speaker 2: obscene material to a minor as part of a plea
Speaker 2: deal agreement for sex and sending Twitter dms to underage
Speaker 2: girls as young as fifteen. Democratic donor activists and Hollywood
Speaker 2: producer Harvey Weinstein is being criminally prosecuted and civilly sued
Speaker 2: for years of sexual abuse that was well known, that
Speaker 2: was a well known secret in Hollywood, including underage sexual
Speaker 2: activities with aspiring female actresses. Democratic activists and Me Too
Speaker 2: proponent Asia Argento settled a lawsuit for sexual harassment stemming
Speaker 2: from sexual activities with an underage actor. Imagine being the
Speaker 2: person running me Too, and you're the one that is
Speaker 2: like you're the reason, like you're the reason that you
Speaker 2: even have to run something like that.
Speaker 3: It is disgusting, dude. And that's the thing. As we're
Speaker 3: reading some of those Christians and these pastors and the
Speaker 3: Christian Conservative Movement Party leader or whatever was also doing
Speaker 3: this kind of shit. It's it's the hypocrisy really does
Speaker 3: know no bounds whenever politic gets involved.
Speaker 2: Democratic mayor of Racine, Wisconsin, Gary Becker, was convicted of
Speaker 2: attempted child seduction child pornography and other child sex crimes.
Speaker 2: Democratic Seattle Mayor Ed Murray resigned after multiple accusations of
Speaker 2: child sexual abuse were levied against him, including by family members.
Speaker 2: Democratic activists and aid to New York City Mayor Deblasio
Speaker 2: Jacob Schwartz was arrested on possession of three thousand plus
Speaker 2: child pornographic images. Democratic activists and actor Russell Simmons was
Speaker 2: sued based on an allegation of sexual assault where he
Speaker 2: coerced an underage model for sex. Democratic Governor of Oregon
Speaker 2: Neil Goldschmidt after being caught by a newspaper publicly admitting
Speaker 2: to having admitted to having a past sexual relationship with
Speaker 2: a thirteen year old girl after the statute of limitations
Speaker 2: on the rape charges had expired.
Speaker 1: Oh you, dirty, fucking bitch.
Speaker 2: Democratic Illinois Congressman Mel Reynolds resigned from Congress after he
Speaker 2: was convicted of a statutory rape of a sixteen year.
Speaker 1: Old campaign volunteer.
Speaker 2: Democratic New York Congressman Fred Richmond was arrested in Washington,
Speaker 2: d c. For soliciting sex from a sixteen year old boy.
Speaker 2: Democratic activist donor and director Roman Polanski fled the country
Speaker 2: after pleading guilty to statutory rape of a thirteen year
Speaker 2: old girl. Democrats and Hollywood actors still defend him to
Speaker 2: this day, including Whoopy Goldberg, Martin Scorsese, Woody Allen, David Lynch,
Speaker 2: Wim Wenders, Pedro, Almo Dovar, Tilda Swinton.
Speaker 1: And Monica Blucci.
Speaker 2: Interesting that Woody Allen would be advocating for that because
Speaker 2: he's a fucking peederal himself.
Speaker 3: Absolutely so Roman Polanski. He even had to flee the country.
Speaker 3: And still to this day, I've heard Whoopi Goldberg in
Speaker 3: the past few months mentioned him as if he was
Speaker 3: a really good guy like Roman Polanski.
Speaker 1: Just he was.
Speaker 3: He was not charged, but he had these allegations again
Speaker 3: and all this, and like yeah, he might have, but
Speaker 3: you know what's this and this? And it's like, wait,
Speaker 3: will be Goldberg, the one who is the one of
Speaker 3: the biggest screaming lib tards that we have, is vouching
Speaker 3: for a known child predator?
Speaker 1: Interesting?
Speaker 2: What be Goldberg? Is an abomination of a human being?
Speaker 2: Where was a Democratic State senator from Alaska, George Jacko
Speaker 2: was found was found guilty of sexual harassment of an
Speaker 2: underage legislative page. Democratic state representative candidate for Colorado Andrew
Speaker 2: Myers was convicted for possession of child pornography and enticing children.
Speaker 2: Democratic Illinois Congressman Gus Savage was investigated by the Democrat
Speaker 2: controlled House Committee on Ethics for attempting to rape an
Speaker 2: underage female Peace Corps volunteer in Zaire the committed. The
Speaker 2: committee concluded that while the events did occur, his apology
Speaker 2: was sufficient and took no further action.
Speaker 3: Wow, he attempted to rape a Peace Corps volunteer, but
Speaker 3: his apology is enough.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Democratic activist, donor and spokesperson for Subway Jared Fogel was
Speaker 2: convicted for distribution and receipt of child pornography and traveling
Speaker 2: to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we all know about Jared.
Speaker 2: That fuck Still to this day, I prefer Jimmy Johns
Speaker 2: over Subway specifically for that. Yeah, and it's just a
Speaker 2: superior sandwich. Nextly, we have Democratic State Department official Carl
Speaker 2: Kerry under Hillary Clinton State Department was arrested on ten
Speaker 2: counts of child porn possession. Democratic main Assistant Attorney General
Speaker 2: James Cameron was sentenced to just over fifteen years in
Speaker 2: federal prison for seven counts of child porn possession, receipt,
Speaker 2: and transmission. Democratic State Department official Daniel Rosen under Hillary
Speaker 2: Clinton State Department was arrested and charged with allegedly soliciting
Speaker 2: sex from a miner over the Internet. Democratic State Department
Speaker 2: official James cap pleaded guilty to one count of transportation
Speaker 2: of child pornography. Democratic radio host Bernie Ward pled guilty
Speaker 2: to one count of sending child pornography over the Internet.
Speaker 2: And lastly, but not leastly, Democratic Deputy Attorney General from California,
Speaker 2: Raymond Liddy was arrested for a possession of child pornography.
Speaker 3: So, again, as we are, you heard a lot of
Speaker 3: Republican names. Just now you heard a lot more Democrat names,
Speaker 3: I should say, and yeah, Epstein was brought up, Weinstein
Speaker 3: was brought up, Roman Polansky. Not all of them were politicians,
Speaker 3: but these were very big proponents for their political affiliations. Right, Okay,
Speaker 3: taking all of that in, now, let's cut back to
Speaker 3: the votes that are being cast in Washington, DC right now, right,
Speaker 3: and about how they only need one or two more
Speaker 3: signatures to pass this vote. I currently am of the
Speaker 3: belief that the conspiracy here is that the Demo. Democrats
Speaker 3: don't want this information out to the public either. They
Speaker 3: would ruin them just as much as it would ruin
Speaker 3: the Republicans. It would in fact, drain the swamp if
Speaker 3: the real Epstein list was released. And no, I don't
Speaker 3: mean just the flight logs, because the flight logs don't
Speaker 3: necessarily show guilt to a crime against children. Okay, just
Speaker 3: because you flew on his plane one time, it's very
Speaker 3: possible you didn't see anything, you didn't hear anything. You
Speaker 3: just thought that your boy that has a plane, it
Speaker 3: was nice for him to give you a ride from
Speaker 3: point A to point B.
Speaker 1: Okay. And I don't mean.
Speaker 3: His associate list, because he was a big time money
Speaker 3: launderer for the entire world. Right if you needed some
Speaker 3: money to go off record, you called Jeff. That was
Speaker 3: an understood fact. So just because you have a name
Speaker 3: that was released as an associate of his does not
Speaker 3: guarantee some sort of guilt to a crime against the child.
Speaker 3: But this list that the actual victims are compiling right now,
Speaker 3: associate that with the list and these emails that are
Speaker 3: being released, the names that are about to be dropped.
Speaker 3: All of these things, the Democrats do not want this release.
Speaker 3: They're saying that they do because it it poses what
Speaker 3: Trump has going on. I would venture to bet that
Speaker 3: if Trump was on board with the releasing of these files,
Speaker 3: the Democrats would actually be voting against it to do
Speaker 3: because he's uh, you know, being mean.
Speaker 1: To the victims or something.
Speaker 3: They would they would use some sort of a talking
Speaker 3: point to show how whatever Trump is doing is bad
Speaker 3: and we have to oppose a pose pose no matter what.
Speaker 1: Currently, Trump is saying that.
Speaker 3: He doesn't he sees a dead issue and it's a
Speaker 3: hoax and it needs to be washed, washed away and
Speaker 3: you know, swept under the rug. The Democrats smell blood
Speaker 3: in the water. So they have decided to triple down
Speaker 3: and in a mass unified effort. There's not one Democrat
Speaker 3: that didn't sign right, So they are doing this as
Speaker 3: a unified front to oppose Trump, regardless of whatever it is.
Speaker 3: If Trump was to pass a bill right now to
Speaker 3: say that all cancer treatment is free of charge from
Speaker 3: this point forward, the Democrats would oppose that by saying
Speaker 3: he's taking money out of the oncologist pocket.
Speaker 1: That's how it is right now.
Speaker 2: Look, the only way that we're going to get any
Speaker 2: kind of real information is going to be from the
Speaker 2: victims that are compiling that list. I do want to
Speaker 2: share this video rate here. This is from the New
Speaker 2: York Post, which was published September third, so just.
Speaker 1: A few weeks ago, not even a few weeks ago, of.
Speaker 2: The Epstein victims of vow to compile client list of
Speaker 2: their own after house panel drops thousands of documents. It's
Speaker 2: only almost four minutes, but let's hear what they got
Speaker 2: to say, because this might be the only hope that
Speaker 2: we have at any of these names coming out, names
Speaker 2: that are not going to be fucked with by either party.
Speaker 2: These are from specifically the victims themselves, which I hope
Speaker 2: that this list comes out because this, in my eyes,
Speaker 2: this is the only real true list. Yeah, so let's
Speaker 2: see what they gotta say.
Speaker 10: Hi there, my name is Lisa Phillips, and I'm the
Speaker 10: host of award nominated podcast called From Now on a
Speaker 10: platform supporting survivors. I want to thank all of my
Speaker 10: survivor's sisters who came before me today. I'll be very short.
Speaker 10: In the year two thousand, I was taken to Jeffrey
Speaker 10: Epstein's island while on a photoshoot on a nearby Island.
Speaker 10: Who I saw and what I experienced there was a
Speaker 10: glimpse into a very dark and disturbing world. For years after,
Speaker 10: I tried to avoid Jeffrey, but he had introduced me
Speaker 10: to Katie Ford, the owner of the Ford Modeling Agency.
Speaker 10: Epstein's reach went to the very top of fashion, arts,
Speaker 10: and entertainment. This did not just happen to underage girls
Speaker 10: in Florida. In New York City, hundreds of young, ambitious
Speaker 10: women were abused by him. Epstein was not just a
Speaker 10: serial predator. He was an international human trafficker. And many
Speaker 10: around him knew, many participated, and many profited, and yet
Speaker 10: he was protected. So I stand here today for every
Speaker 10: woman who has been silenced, exploited, and dismissed. We are
Speaker 10: not asking for pity. We are here demanding accountability and
Speaker 10: I'm demanding justice. Congress must choose will you continue to
Speaker 10: protect predators or will you finally protect survivors? And also,
Speaker 10: I would like to announce here today us Epstein survivors
Speaker 10: have been discussing creating our own list.
Speaker 1: We know the names many.
Speaker 10: Of us were abused by them. Now, together as survivors,
Speaker 10: we will confidentially compile the names. We all know who
Speaker 10: regularly and who are regularly in the Epstein world, and
Speaker 10: it will be by survivors and for survivors, no one
Speaker 10: else is involved. Stay tuned for more details. We're reaching
Speaker 10: out to survivors that are scared to come forward and
Speaker 10: that also know who they were traffic to. So that's
Speaker 10: the list that we're compiling. We're not quite sure, you know,
Speaker 10: how we're going to release that or even if we're
Speaker 10: going to the Department of Justice needs to release the list,
Speaker 10: right because.
Speaker 1: For folks at home, they might be confused.
Speaker 6: You know, survivors know the names.
Speaker 4: You've seen these powerful people.
Speaker 1: Why can't you say the names?
Speaker 6: Could you just explain?
Speaker 10: Why do we have to say the names when the
Speaker 10: government knows the names and we're also scared to do so.
Speaker 10: Look what's happened to so many of the survivors that
Speaker 10: have revealed names.
Speaker 5: Yes, I find that.
Speaker 11: I think it's also we're saying that having represented I think,
Speaker 11: between our firm and Voice Chiller, hundreds of victims and
Speaker 11: we've talked to them about the various people that they
Speaker 11: were farmed out to. So we've created somewhat of a list.
Speaker 11: Most of these individuals, the victims are very scared to
Speaker 11: say these names because they could get sued. They're going
Speaker 11: to get attacked, and nobody protected him the first time,
Speaker 11: and that was against one person.
Speaker 1: So is there a list?
Speaker 11: There is a list, But just to dispel kind of
Speaker 11: the common theme here, every one of these women was
Speaker 11: abused by Jeffrey Epstein, and his scheme was to personally
Speaker 11: abuse women when they reached a certain age. He did
Speaker 11: farm a section of them, some of them out to
Speaker 11: some of his friends. That doesn't mean all of his friends.
Speaker 11: With that said, I'm more than happy to assist in
Speaker 11: helping create the list behind the scenes and see.
Speaker 1: What we do with that.
Speaker 4: I think if someone's interested in prosecuting, they may have
Speaker 4: something different to say about sharing a list, but they're
Speaker 4: not sharing a list for nothing to happen, and that's
Speaker 4: the experience that they've had for all of these years.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't agree more.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it sucks and we all want that list,
Speaker 2: but you kind of got to understand why they wouldn't
Speaker 2: want to release it because they hundreds.
Speaker 3: There are hundreds of girls, and these are just the
Speaker 3: girls that have come forward. There are thousands he was
Speaker 3: running this scheme. There are those that will say only
Speaker 3: starting in the early two thousands. No, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 3: he was running this scheme for most of the nineties, yeah,
Speaker 3: into the two thousands, into the twenty teens. When he
Speaker 3: was finally caught and brought you know, quote unquote to justice,
Speaker 3: he wasn't. But my point is, this is thousands of
Speaker 3: girls for years that will be able to come forward
Speaker 3: and say it was this person. I was brought to
Speaker 3: this house owned by this person, and this is what
Speaker 3: took place, and these are the guilty parties. And there's
Speaker 3: a reason why they don't say this. It's not because
Speaker 3: these are just some obscure names that nobody would recognize.
Speaker 1: These are names that are currently serving.
Speaker 2: Man well, I mean, look, this is not to overshadow
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk's assassination by any means like that. It's fucking disgusting,
Speaker 2: and you know, he definitely needs to be brought to justice,
Speaker 2: His family needs to be brought to justice and everything else.
Speaker 2: But this is what they like to do. They always
Speaker 2: like to take a mass story of which the masses
Speaker 2: of humanity are going to get eyes on, and you know,
Speaker 2: kind of overshadows everything else. And this is this is
Speaker 2: why this is you know it's it's a perfect bait
Speaker 2: and switch is really what it is.
Speaker 3: It is it is one hundred percent dude. And I'm
Speaker 3: not again, I'm not saying that that is the reason
Speaker 3: why Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Good There's multiple levels to that, right,
Speaker 3: But that is the reason why the algorithms are pushing
Speaker 3: it so hard because this is being voted on right now,
Speaker 3: yet no one knows that because everyone's algorithms are showing
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk. And again, I am not blaming left or
Speaker 3: right on this one. I am saying that we need
Speaker 3: to keep our third eye all the way open. We
Speaker 3: need to look at the entire picture.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: The Democrats are trying to use this as a virtue signal,
Speaker 3: even though they know damn goodwill that their names are
Speaker 3: on the list too, But as long as it opposes Trump,
Speaker 3: it's seen as a net positive for the party. Meanwhile,
Speaker 3: the Republicans are all saying no because they were afraid
Speaker 3: of going against Trump, whose name is absolutely on the list.
Speaker 3: Now to what degree and to what level, we don't know,
Speaker 3: but we get I guarantee you his name is on
Speaker 3: the list.
Speaker 2: Look, if they were said, if they were absolutely going.
Speaker 2: If they were this headstrong about releasing the list, what
Speaker 2: about the four year gap that you had a fucking
Speaker 2: Democrat president in office?
Speaker 1: Where did that go? Why did nothing transpire?
Speaker 2: Then? Why did you wait until there was a Republican
Speaker 2: in office? It's it's Maxwell was in prison.
Speaker 3: Maxwell was in prison the entire time Biden was in office.
Speaker 3: No one questioned her, No one brought her in and
Speaker 3: set her down a room with a tape recorder and
Speaker 3: said tell me everything you know, not one fucking person, dude.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's so, there's there's definitely a fucker a foot
Speaker 2: And this is why we cover these things. This is
Speaker 2: why we do five episodes a week, not including everybody
Speaker 2: else that is releasing on our uh on our stream
Speaker 2: as well. So definitely give them a little bit of
Speaker 2: a shout out and support as well. We appreciate everybody
Speaker 2: that is tuning in on every podcast because we want
Speaker 2: to give all of I mean, obviously we don't have
Speaker 2: every you know, conspiratorial voice you know is coming out
Speaker 2: on the Cult of Conspiracy. We have our closest ones
Speaker 2: that are coming out, and everybody is trying to sound
Speaker 2: the alarm. Everybody is trying to wake everybody up. Everybody
Speaker 2: is trying to open up third eyes all across the world,
Speaker 2: and we just want to be able to give a
Speaker 2: platform to be able to expose these things. We do
Speaker 2: believe that the podcast platform is the last unfucked with
Speaker 2: platform for free speech. It's the last uncensored horizon, if
Speaker 2: you will, for free speech. They've already gotten obviously, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter,
Speaker 2: I mean, name any other app they are going to
Speaker 2: be censoring a lot of things. Podcast is. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's it's the last It's the last horizon that hasn't
Speaker 2: been fucked with, And I mean I I can't imagine
Speaker 2: that it's going to be lasting for very much longer.
Speaker 2: I don't know how it has lasted this long if
Speaker 2: I'm being honest, Like, how are we able to say
Speaker 2: the things that we're able to say with zero repercussions?
Speaker 2: Knock on wood. I'm not trying to call it out,
Speaker 2: but it makes you wonder, right like why are they
Speaker 2: allowing this to still transpire for us to be able
Speaker 2: to talk and you know, openly like this. I just
Speaker 2: I can't imagine that it's going to last for infinity.
Speaker 3: No, it's only because we live in America, Right, that's it.
Speaker 3: We have freedom of speech within our constitution, like the
Speaker 3: very basics of what makes an American American is the
Speaker 3: freedom of speech and the freedom of press. But that
Speaker 3: is only one vote away from being lost forever. That
Speaker 3: is one generation away from being a foregone conclusion, a
Speaker 3: historical thing that people will look back on fondly. We
Speaker 3: are one step away from being like UK in Canada
Speaker 3: and Australia, where if you say one, two many mean
Speaker 3: things about a political candidate, they can kick in your
Speaker 3: door and arrest you.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: The only reason is because we currently have freedom of speech,
Speaker 3: and while we still got it, we're gonna use that
Speaker 3: bitch to the fullest. Yeah, and if you will, if
Speaker 3: you're a fan of free speech and you're a fan
Speaker 3: of what we're talking about here, welcome to the culture conspiracy.
Speaker 3: Like I said, cult members, this was going to be
Speaker 3: a dirty one. That long list that we read and
Speaker 3: all the other case members, all the things to show
Speaker 3: that the political figures local level, city level, county level,
Speaker 3: state level, federal level, they're all dirty. And I'm not
Speaker 3: saying with one hundred percent, I'm saying like ninety five.
Speaker 1: Percent are dirty. I will give a little.
Speaker 3: Bit of some grace for that five percent, and maybe
Speaker 3: I'm just high as fuck on hopium about that five percent.
Speaker 3: I'm really holding on to that last little bit of hopium.
Speaker 3: But as more and more things come out, gotta say
Speaker 3: it's it's dwindling.
Speaker 1: More and more by the day. It is.
Speaker 2: It is now for obvious reasons, we are not going
Speaker 2: to uh hump out the Adam and Eve promotion that
Speaker 2: we have, but we do have a couple of host Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: it'd be bad taste, But we do have a couple
Speaker 2: of other ways that you could support us as well. Jacob,
Speaker 2: how can they do that, sir?
Speaker 1: Indeed, indeed good cult members.
Speaker 3: If you would like to get your start in the
Speaker 3: buying and selling and trading of gold and silver bullion,
Speaker 3: then come check us out at coecsilver dot com. The
Speaker 3: link is in the description below with the show notes.
Speaker 3: When you fill out your information there, our homeboy Wayne
Speaker 3: Clark is going to be the one to reach out
Speaker 3: to you and get you squared away. Do you want
Speaker 3: to buy a little bit of silver and gold a
Speaker 3: lot of bit? Do you want to put a portion
Speaker 3: of your retirement nest eak into the precious metal game.
Speaker 3: Talk to your financial advisor, talk to your CPA, talk
Speaker 3: to your accountant, and ask them what they think about it.
Speaker 3: I promise you every one of them is going to
Speaker 3: tell you that it is, in fact a wise investment
Speaker 3: to have a portion of your retirement nest egg in
Speaker 3: precious metals. Reason being, it's a finite, tangible substance that
Speaker 3: is going to gain value as time goes on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it might be a slow rate of growing in things.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the stocks go up down, left, right, and you
Speaker 3: can get on one of these at skyrocket overnight. Silver
Speaker 3: and gold are not gonna skyrocket overnight. That being said,
Speaker 3: for a long term investment strategy, you do need to
Speaker 3: have at least some of your investments backed by silver
Speaker 3: and gold. We're gonna do another episode here soon about
Speaker 3: how they're trying to put gold back into the American dollar.
Speaker 3: We'll get to that later, but my point is, as
Speaker 3: of this moment, gold is over three thousand dollars an ounce.
Speaker 3: Silver is over thirty six dollars an ounce. It's way
Speaker 3: more affordable and way more attainable. While you can still
Speaker 3: get your hands on some, now is the time to
Speaker 3: buy once again. Go to Cocsilver Dot com link in
Speaker 3: the description below and get your start today. But in
Speaker 3: other ways you can support the show and let us
Speaker 3: know what you think about this entire situation.
Speaker 1: Would be too Please hit.
Speaker 3: The five stars, hit the shares of licensed caris comments level,
Speaker 3: postly review shares, a defensi family of the shares, and
Speaker 3: we're here's the deal. The more activity the algorithm se
Speaker 3: across all of our listening platforms, the more we get promoted,
Speaker 3: the more potential listeners who could that become potential cult
Speaker 3: members actres Steve, Fine, ladies and gentlemen, why are you
Speaker 3: ready to go check out menimistics Jonathan's of the show.
Speaker 1: And getting the same level of respective over there with
Speaker 1: the five star views and.
Speaker 3: The positivity in the comments, and come check out the
Speaker 3: k tonight and come join each of us for our
Speaker 3: individual patrons that we host. Everyone say nine nine pm
Speaker 3: Central links to those of the description.
Speaker 2: As well, and we thank you.
Speaker 1: Everybody's already gone.
Speaker 10: And done so.
Speaker 2: And with that being said, this was another beautiful episode
Speaker 2: of the Cult of Conspiracy. And my name is Jonathan Jake,
Speaker 2: and there's one very important sture, the vital piece of
Speaker 2: information we need you to learn just as soon as
Speaker 2: humanly possible.
Speaker 3: Hey, cult members, Jacob here just want to ask who
Speaker 3: wants better. The best way to get started is to
Speaker 3: go to Adam and Eve dot com Right now, abim
Speaker 3: Eve is offering fifty percent off just about any item,
Speaker 3: but that's not all. When you get one item, they
Speaker 3: will also send three bonus sexy items and six free movies.
Speaker 3: They offered a screen shipping as your privacy is a priority.
Speaker 3: Plus free shipping on your entire order. Doesn't matter how
Speaker 3: much you spend or what you buy. All we packaged
Speaker 3: and sent discreetly for free. That's fifty percent off one
Speaker 3: item and ten free gifts to boot bring more pleasure
Speaker 3: and satisfaction into your bedroom. Just go to Adam and
Speaker 3: Eve dot com and select any one item. It could
Speaker 3: be an adventurous new toy or anything you desire. Just
Speaker 3: enter the offer code cult at checkout and you'll get
Speaker 3: fifty percent off almost any item, plus ten free gifts,
Speaker 3: three bonus items, six free movies, and free shipping.
Speaker 1: Use the offer code cult that Seult at Adam and
Speaker 1: Eve dot com. Now.
Speaker 3: This is an exclusive offer specific to this podcast, so
Speaker 3: be sure to use this code to get you not
Speaker 3: just the discount and the free goodies, but also the
Speaker 3: one hundred percent free shipping with the code Cult