WEBVTT

1
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the gods View Podcast. I am your host, Trevor.

2
00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>How's everybody doing out there in the world wide world.

3
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for the weird like slowing of the audio last week.

4
00:00:27.359 --> 00:00:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It sounded like some of the clips we were playing

5
00:00:29.399 --> 00:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it sounded like the guy was drunk or something. The

6
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing I could figure out at least what my

7
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is I just had way too many things running

8
00:00:43.960 --> 00:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on my computer at once, which is crazy because this

9
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is a brand new MacBook Pro. But I literally had

10
00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:56.439
<v Speaker 1>like thirty different I have like MRI imaging processing software going,

11
00:00:56.560 --> 00:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and I had our studio statistics, you know, a million

12
00:01:02.399 --> 00:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>browser tabs word Excel. It was just it was a

13
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:10.879
<v Speaker 1>nightmare just trying to like save a file froze my computer.

14
00:01:11.040 --> 00:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've managed to destroy another perfectly good laptop, but

15
00:01:16.159 --> 00:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I've closed everything. I've deleted about two hundred gigabytes worth

16
00:01:20.959 --> 00:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the stuff, and I think we're back in business anyway.

17
00:01:26.439 --> 00:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Great to be with you all again. This will be

18
00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>part two of our did Jesus Claim to Be God? Series,

19
00:01:36.359 --> 00:01:41.079
<v Speaker 1>which is really just a you know, hijacking of Alex

20
00:01:41.079 --> 00:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor's great content and adding some commentary which kind of

21
00:01:46.920 --> 00:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>brings me to a show housekeeping thing I want to

22
00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:54.359
<v Speaker 1>bring up before we get started. You know, I've been

23
00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>recording like an episode a day for quite a while

24
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of nice. I know, I've said many

25
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>times before that the show is sort of really it's

26
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.359
<v Speaker 1>just for my own mental health. But you know, I

27
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>am feeling the instinct waning. You know, it's because I,

28
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>within the context of like science and philosophy and religion,

29
00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of like said everything that I know, you know,

30
00:02:22.919 --> 00:02:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so I'm kind of I'm feeling I'm starting to feel repetitive,

31
00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>so I'll probably slow down the frequency. But one thing

32
00:02:31.479 --> 00:02:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that I thought would be kind of cool, and this

33
00:02:33.439 --> 00:02:38.479
<v Speaker 1>is a long shot, is it would be nice, you know,

34
00:02:38.520 --> 00:02:41.039
<v Speaker 1>because I've always recorded shows in the past with the

35
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>co host, you know, in my different failed podcast experiments,

36
00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice to maybe have like an occasional

37
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>guest co host show up. So if you're sitting out

38
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there listening and you're like, dear God, that's me, I'm

39
00:02:56.319 --> 00:02:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the guy or the gal, and you're like, I am

40
00:02:59.680 --> 00:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the one, and I will rise to the challenge, shoot

41
00:03:04.840 --> 00:03:07.719
<v Speaker 1>me an email. I know it'd probably be a little

42
00:03:07.719 --> 00:03:11.159
<v Speaker 1>bit awkward the first couple of times, but uh, I

43
00:03:11.199 --> 00:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's just nice, Like if I say something

44
00:03:14.120 --> 00:03:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that isn't clear, it's nice to have somebody else say like, wait,

45
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>can you re explain that? Or if we're reacting to clips,

46
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's things I might miss, So it would

47
00:03:24.840 --> 00:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be cool. You don't necessarily have to be like an

48
00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>expert in anything. I mean, it would be welcome. You know,

49
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're out there listening and you're a you're a

50
00:03:37.000 --> 00:03:42.159
<v Speaker 1>physicist or a or a theologian or a philosopher, like yeah,

51
00:03:42.240 --> 00:03:45.439
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, that'd be sick. But you also

52
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:46.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be that. We could just sort of

53
00:03:47.919 --> 00:03:52.039
<v Speaker 1>react to stuff. So really, really, no matter where you're

54
00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:54.159
<v Speaker 1>at in the intellectual spectrum, I think it is just

55
00:03:54.280 --> 00:03:57.919
<v Speaker 1>nice to have a second perspective, you know, someone who

56
00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:02.759
<v Speaker 1>someone who's either sometime can be like a foil or

57
00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a sounding board or represent people who maybe don't know

58
00:04:07.479 --> 00:04:10.879
<v Speaker 1>as much about the topic and ask sort of basic

59
00:04:10.919 --> 00:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but important questions. I think that's all good. So shoot

60
00:04:14.879 --> 00:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>me an email at God's I view book at gmail

61
00:04:17.800 --> 00:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com if you're interested. Now back to the show.

62
00:04:22.959 --> 00:04:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Last episode we listened to Mark, we talked about an

63
00:04:27.399 --> 00:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>argument from Mark, which is that Jesus forgave sins and

64
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>only and God alone can forgive sins. It's so fact though,

65
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you know Jesus is God. And I, I mean, I

66
00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but I found the I found

67
00:04:41.399 --> 00:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the take pretty compelling. I mean, maybe maybe I'm saying

68
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that because I've seen Alex make people look dumb on

69
00:04:50.439 --> 00:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>this point, and he certainly did not make this guy

70
00:04:54.319 --> 00:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>look dumb. I need to figure out what his name

71
00:04:55.959 --> 00:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is so he can plug his book. It's not in

72
00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the title or the description. But anyway, he certainly didn't

73
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>make this guy look dumb. I didn't think. And then

74
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex brought up a point that, well, you know, Matthew

75
00:05:08.040 --> 00:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>told the same story, but he made it even let

76
00:05:10.759 --> 00:05:15.879
<v Speaker 1>he made Jesus making even less of a divine claim.

77
00:05:16.120 --> 00:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the counter argument was, yeah, but it

78
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>still is a divine claim. And Matthew is just a

79
00:05:21.319 --> 00:05:25.879
<v Speaker 1>shorter book so there's less detail. And yeah, I grant that,

80
00:05:26.720 --> 00:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of all the verses to remove, those two are not

81
00:05:30.240 --> 00:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>ideal for my argument, but I agree it doesn't really

82
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like fundamentally change anything. So now we're moving into the

83
00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>next part, and this looks like It's about twelve minutes long,

84
00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and the title of this chapter is Jesus as a

85
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:57.519
<v Speaker 1>disciple of John the Baptist. And if you could make

86
00:05:57.600 --> 00:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this argument, then that be pretty you know, bad for

87
00:06:03.759 --> 00:06:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Jesus's divine claim because it's sort of it would sort

88
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of be odd for God to be a disciple of

89
00:06:12.079 --> 00:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a man. But again, I think I think like the

90
00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>atheists or the non Christians kind of press the point

91
00:06:21.920 --> 00:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>too far here. What's what's the word I'm looking for?

92
00:06:26.120 --> 00:06:29.439
<v Speaker 1>They're they're kind of they're fighting an argument that even

93
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:32.439
<v Speaker 1>really Christians themselves I don't think would make. Which is

94
00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:36.519
<v Speaker 1>not that the word Jesus and the word God are synonyms.

95
00:06:37.560 --> 00:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true. Jesus is one aspect of

96
00:06:40.600 --> 00:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a triune God. He's not the Father, he's not the

97
00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit. He was sent by the Father. However, he

98
00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is God. Not again, not synonymous with God, but he

99
00:06:52.079 --> 00:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is an aspect of my favorite, my favorite analogy of

100
00:06:56.399 --> 00:07:01.199
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity, because there's like this whole joke around theology

101
00:07:01.240 --> 00:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that like, no matter how you try to describe the Trinity,

102
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you commit the heresy like saying like ice, water and steam,

103
00:07:09.879 --> 00:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>like is the heresy of X you know, there's all

104
00:07:12.759 --> 00:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>these named heresies that the Catholic Church has come up with,

105
00:07:17.720 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much every analogy you can come up with

106
00:07:21.439 --> 00:07:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is a heresy, except maybe one, which is Neopolitan ice cream,

107
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, it's all the ice cream,

108
00:07:29.079 --> 00:07:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, but you have three different aspects chocolate, vanilla, strawberry.

109
00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's funny that probably is the best

110
00:07:36.279 --> 00:07:39.399
<v Speaker 1>analogy for the trinity. So when you say, like in

111
00:07:39.480 --> 00:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that example, if you said chocolate is ice cream, that

112
00:07:43.279 --> 00:07:47.079
<v Speaker 1>would be correct, right, But it's not the same as

113
00:07:47.120 --> 00:07:49.079
<v Speaker 1>the whole carton of ice cream. It's like a specific

114
00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>flavor of the triune ice cream. Okay, I'm not trying

115
00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to be sacrilegiously. I think it is legitimately probably a

116
00:07:57.920 --> 00:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>good analogy. But curious what you think. Okay, here we go, Jesus,

117
00:08:01.279 --> 00:08:03.839
<v Speaker 1>as a disciple of John the Baptist.

118
00:08:03.959 --> 00:08:05.759
<v Speaker 2>I should lay out what my position is here, what

119
00:08:05.759 --> 00:08:08.439
<v Speaker 2>my understanding is to help here, and maybe you can

120
00:08:08.519 --> 00:08:10.160
<v Speaker 2>lay out yours. Two, I think you might have betrayed

121
00:08:10.199 --> 00:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>yourself as a Catholic given your use of Latin. I

122
00:08:13.199 --> 00:08:16.399
<v Speaker 2>think you know it's out in the open now for

123
00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:17.279
<v Speaker 2>our listeners.

124
00:08:18.160 --> 00:08:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Yes, for what it's worth.

125
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm quite attracted to the idea that Jesus, historically speaking,

126
00:08:25.319 --> 00:08:28.319
<v Speaker 2>is essentially a follower of John the Baptist, a disciple

127
00:08:28.319 --> 00:08:31.839
<v Speaker 2>of John the Baptist. And there's some evidence in this

128
00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in the fact that Jesus is of course baptized by

129
00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:36.639
<v Speaker 2>John the Baptists, and John is preaching a baptism of

130
00:08:36.679 --> 00:08:40.279
<v Speaker 2>repentance for the forgiveness of sins. A lot of people

131
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>think that John was a type of June known as

132
00:08:42.279 --> 00:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>an Esscene, because there are sort of three major Jewish

133
00:08:44.759 --> 00:08:49.039
<v Speaker 2>groups in this time. There's the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and

134
00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:52.159
<v Speaker 2>the Essenes, and of course a lot of people might

135
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:53.960
<v Speaker 2>not have heard of the latter group because Jesus is

136
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>constantly battling with the first two, never battles with third.

137
00:08:57.639 --> 00:09:01.399
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that Alex sort of sneaking in another

138
00:09:01.480 --> 00:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>atheist talking point, which again I'm not saying talking point

139
00:09:04.799 --> 00:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like a stupid atheist. It's it's valid, it's you know,

140
00:09:08.360 --> 00:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we should contend with all this stuff. You know,

141
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:14.399
<v Speaker 1>most people haven't heard of the a scene. Most Christians

142
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:18.039
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard of the Ascene, because Jesus most likely was

143
00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in a scene jew you know, an Aramaic speaking Galilean,

144
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a scene Jew and the religious authority in in the

145
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:36.039
<v Speaker 1>major the major cities and stuff was were the Pharisees

146
00:09:36.039 --> 00:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Sadducees, and they have different beliefs, like the

147
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Sadducees did not believe in an end time resurrection, the

148
00:09:43.320 --> 00:09:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Pharisees did, you know, And compared to the scene, they're

149
00:09:47.559 --> 00:09:49.799
<v Speaker 1>probably more like legalistic. But I don't know if we

150
00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:51.919
<v Speaker 1>actually know that for sure. That's just how it to portrayed.

151
00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And so Jesus was not a part of that group.

152
00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>John the Baptist was most likely not a part of

153
00:09:59.159 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 1>that group. And so this is sort of positioned as

154
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:06.919
<v Speaker 1>like this makes this text almost sort of like political.

155
00:10:07.559 --> 00:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a almost like a political figure

156
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to usurp the current religious authority. I mean, listen,

157
00:10:18.759 --> 00:10:21.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not a totally unreasonable hypothesis. I just don't think

158
00:10:21.799 --> 00:10:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it really finds a ton of support. I could be wrong.

159
00:10:24.759 --> 00:10:27.039
<v Speaker 1>One thing about the scenes that are interesting is that

160
00:10:27.080 --> 00:10:32.399
<v Speaker 1>they are very I think. You know, again, I don't

161
00:10:32.440 --> 00:10:35.759
<v Speaker 1>know a ton a ton about this stuff. I think

162
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I represent like an educated layman maybe, but my impression

163
00:10:41.399 --> 00:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is that the scene were pretty mystical, and they were

164
00:10:45.039 --> 00:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty focused on the apocalypse, and they were excellent record keepers.

165
00:10:49.799 --> 00:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know the Dead Sea Scrolls, for example, that's

166
00:10:54.480 --> 00:10:59.519
<v Speaker 1>in a scene library that was discovered, so he kind

167
00:10:59.519 --> 00:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of snuck that in there. It's completely unrelated to the

168
00:11:01.639 --> 00:11:03.759
<v Speaker 1>brighter point. I just wanted to clarify a lot of bit.

169
00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a barely sort of you know, well trodden power

170
00:11:07.279 --> 00:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to people who suggest this means Jesus is an ess

171
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>scene in the tradition of John the Baptist, John the

172
00:11:12.080 --> 00:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Baptist dies. John is constantly talking about having a successor.

173
00:11:15.159 --> 00:11:16.840
<v Speaker 2>There's one coming who's going to be greater than me.

174
00:11:17.240 --> 00:11:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Jesus is that man. Jesus sort of continues the ministry

175
00:11:20.159 --> 00:11:21.759
<v Speaker 2>of John the Baptist, and then what we see is

176
00:11:21.840 --> 00:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Jesus preparing to pass on that ministry to his own

177
00:11:26.120 --> 00:11:29.440
<v Speaker 2>disciples and singling out Peter as his sort of main successor.

178
00:11:29.879 --> 00:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>And of course this is very unorthodox for Christians, but

179
00:11:32.320 --> 00:11:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm speaking historically here. There are some clues here. Jesus

180
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>is saying things to his disciples like, you know, one

181
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>day you'll do greater things than I will. He talks

182
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>about teachers and students and how the students will surpass

183
00:11:42.120 --> 00:11:45.039
<v Speaker 2>the teacher. And of course the main thing and the

184
00:11:45.080 --> 00:11:46.799
<v Speaker 2>reason I bring this up is to say that whenever

185
00:11:46.840 --> 00:11:51.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm confronted with evidence of Jesus's actions, things that he

186
00:11:51.840 --> 00:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>can do that only God can do, Jesus forgive since

187
00:11:55.639 --> 00:11:58.919
<v Speaker 2>in John chapter twenty he ends up giving that authority

188
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:02.279
<v Speaker 2>to his disciples. Jesus walks on the water. A lot

189
00:12:02.279 --> 00:12:05.519
<v Speaker 2>of people also forget that Peter also walks on the water,

190
00:12:05.639 --> 00:12:07.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, and he starts sinking because he doesn't have

191
00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:09.960
<v Speaker 2>enough faith. But the implication there is that if he

192
00:12:10.039 --> 00:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>had enough faith, he'd be able to walk on the water,

193
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>just like Jesus did. Who meaning, Jesus is presented as

194
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:18.759
<v Speaker 2>this idyllic figure with perfect faith in the Father, and

195
00:12:18.799 --> 00:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>if only Peter has the same faith, he could have

196
00:12:20.840 --> 00:12:21.720
<v Speaker 2>walked on the water too.

197
00:12:22.039 --> 00:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You know.

198
00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Jesus judges mankind, well, he delegates judge.

199
00:12:25.399 --> 00:12:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, and again, I'm sorry if I'm

200
00:12:28.679 --> 00:12:33.519
<v Speaker 1>committing heresy here, but this kind of is the natural reading.

201
00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:36.159
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when I first read the Gospel like

202
00:12:37.000 --> 00:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this is how I interpreted it, I didn't know enough

203
00:12:39.639 --> 00:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to know that this is sort of you know, it's

204
00:12:44.759 --> 00:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe semi problematic with Catholic and Orthodox tradition,

205
00:12:50.480 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>but no, I mean I actually I think I would

206
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>say it's very problematic. You know, if you interpret this

207
00:12:56.279 --> 00:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>as saying that basically we could all be like Jesus

208
00:13:00.720 --> 00:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>literally through faith, I mean, that is a pretty problematic belief,

209
00:13:05.759 --> 00:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, for sort of mainstream Christianity. So anyway, so

210
00:13:11.519 --> 00:13:13.919
<v Speaker 1>to Alex's point, I mean that is how it reads

211
00:13:14.320 --> 00:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to an uninformed person reading it for the first.

212
00:13:17.000 --> 00:13:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Time, richment of the Twelve Tribes of Israel to the disciples.

213
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>So as we talk about some of these examples, I

214
00:13:22.600 --> 00:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>want you to I want my listeners, our listeners, to

215
00:13:25.399 --> 00:13:28.679
<v Speaker 2>recognize in my responses that that is kind of my

216
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:31.879
<v Speaker 2>rough understanding that in these instances where Jesus is doing

217
00:13:31.879 --> 00:13:35.399
<v Speaker 2>something extraordinary and yeah, he is obviously doing something amazing

218
00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and something that at least common understanding would have it

219
00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:40.519
<v Speaker 2>that only God can do, Jesus is sort of saying, no, watch,

220
00:13:40.519 --> 00:13:42.559
<v Speaker 2>I can do this too, but only in a way

221
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that one day you will also, and that the most

222
00:13:46.360 --> 00:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of the greatest summary of this is in John

223
00:13:50.080 --> 00:13:54.159
<v Speaker 2>chapter seventeen, where Jesus is praying for his disciples and

224
00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the wider Christian community, and he prays that one day,

225
00:13:57.840 --> 00:14:01.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, they will be in me just as I

226
00:14:01.080 --> 00:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>am in you the Father, and will all sort of

227
00:14:02.960 --> 00:14:05.720
<v Speaker 2>be one together, seeming to imply that the special relationship

228
00:14:05.720 --> 00:14:08.879
<v Speaker 2>pieces house with the Father is something that will hopefully

229
00:14:08.879 --> 00:14:11.320
<v Speaker 2>be passed on to other people. So that's basically my

230
00:14:11.879 --> 00:14:14.279
<v Speaker 2>broad position. Just I thought it's worth laying that out

231
00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>as we go through these.

232
00:14:15.919 --> 00:14:19.559
<v Speaker 3>No, that's really helpful, So let me let me let

233
00:14:19.639 --> 00:14:21.759
<v Speaker 3>me try to lay out just in a brief way

234
00:14:21.879 --> 00:14:25.159
<v Speaker 3>mine and then I'd like to point to some things

235
00:14:25.159 --> 00:14:28.919
<v Speaker 3>that I might that might be intention with that reading,

236
00:14:29.039 --> 00:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>just or emphasize how I basically let me say I

237
00:14:31.519 --> 00:14:33.480
<v Speaker 3>agree with you, because actually one of the amazing things

238
00:14:33.519 --> 00:14:36.799
<v Speaker 3>about Christianity is that it makes very exalted claims for

239
00:14:36.879 --> 00:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the gifts that it professes. Both the apostles, their disciples

240
00:14:41.559 --> 00:14:44.159
<v Speaker 3>and other believers will be able to share it. It's

241
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:45.960
<v Speaker 3>a very high claim, and this is where the whole

242
00:14:46.039 --> 00:14:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Christian tradition of theosis or demonization comes from, even though

243
00:14:49.279 --> 00:14:53.919
<v Speaker 3>that's not very well known and contemporary Christian circles and discourse.

244
00:14:53.960 --> 00:14:58.399
<v Speaker 3>I think. So my basic position, or the couple of

245
00:14:58.399 --> 00:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>positions that I want to try to lay out in

246
00:15:00.039 --> 00:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>this book. Number one is that on the level of

247
00:15:04.519 --> 00:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the gospel narratives, I'm trying to undo what I believe

248
00:15:07.759 --> 00:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to be a very erroneous position that Jesus is only divine,

249
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:15.399
<v Speaker 3>only depicted as divine in John and not in the parotics. Okay,

250
00:15:15.440 --> 00:15:18.919
<v Speaker 3>So I actually think that the that the when it

251
00:15:18.919 --> 00:15:21.399
<v Speaker 3>comes to the four sources from the first century about Jesus,

252
00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:23.440
<v Speaker 3>he acts and speaks as if he's divine in all

253
00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:25.919
<v Speaker 3>four Marthy, Mark, Luke, and John, not just not just

254
00:15:25.960 --> 00:15:29.759
<v Speaker 3>the fore call a second. I actually think that in

255
00:15:29.799 --> 00:15:33.039
<v Speaker 3>addition to the passages that you just listed about him

256
00:15:33.080 --> 00:15:37.039
<v Speaker 3>performing divine actions or having divine power to forgive sins

257
00:15:37.320 --> 00:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>or to judge right, in addition to those, there are

258
00:15:40.840 --> 00:15:44.919
<v Speaker 3>other passages where Jesus does things that I, at least

259
00:15:45.399 --> 00:15:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I think he doesn't give to his disciples. So let

260
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:50.279
<v Speaker 3>me let me give you a couple of examples. Is

261
00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:51.240
<v Speaker 3>that fair? Please just do that?

262
00:15:51.279 --> 00:15:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

263
00:15:51.840 --> 00:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>So for example, let's look at the walking on the seat.

264
00:15:55.440 --> 00:15:59.240
<v Speaker 3>So I have the chapter called the Epiphanic Miracles in

265
00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:01.399
<v Speaker 3>the book. This is the second chapter, and one of

266
00:16:01.440 --> 00:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the main points of this chapter is actually to just

267
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>demolish what I think is actually a myth, the myth

268
00:16:06.159 --> 00:16:08.799
<v Speaker 3>that he's only divine in John he's not really divine

269
00:16:08.960 --> 00:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>in the Synoptics. I just think that doesn't hold up,

270
00:16:11.440 --> 00:16:13.919
<v Speaker 3>and it's worked in the modern period, primarily because in

271
00:16:13.960 --> 00:16:16.559
<v Speaker 3>the modern period there's been a tendencyy to bracket the

272
00:16:16.600 --> 00:16:19.799
<v Speaker 3>miraculous out as if these aren't even part of the Gospels.

273
00:16:19.840 --> 00:16:21.960
<v Speaker 3>It's almost kind like a cannon with and cannon. So

274
00:16:22.120 --> 00:16:24.919
<v Speaker 3>lots of books on Jesus just ignore what are known

275
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:28.919
<v Speaker 3>widely as the Epiphanic miracles. Now, epiphantic miracles already suggest

276
00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:31.759
<v Speaker 3>to you that something is being unveiled or revealed, and

277
00:16:31.759 --> 00:16:33.559
<v Speaker 3>it's not just a merely human quality.

278
00:16:33.639 --> 00:16:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Right.

279
00:16:33.960 --> 00:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>This is why King Antikas the Fourth, when he wants

280
00:16:36.360 --> 00:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>to claim divinity he mints coins and tiacas epifondos right

281
00:16:40.519 --> 00:16:44.799
<v Speaker 3>and tiacus God manifest right. He's he's making a divine claim.

282
00:16:45.120 --> 00:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>But the epiphanu miracle that I think is really crucial

283
00:16:47.240 --> 00:16:50.960
<v Speaker 3>here in Mark six, the walking on the sea takes place.

284
00:16:51.519 --> 00:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>In it, Jesus does something you're right, that he enables.

285
00:16:55.159 --> 00:16:57.399
<v Speaker 3>In Matthew's version, he enables Peter at least to walk

286
00:16:57.440 --> 00:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>briefly on the sea, but before he begins to sing.

287
00:17:00.120 --> 00:17:01.759
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things he does that at least

288
00:17:01.759 --> 00:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't see Peter or any other disciple doing anywhere else,

289
00:17:05.119 --> 00:17:10.160
<v Speaker 3>is take the divine name as his own from the

290
00:17:10.240 --> 00:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament.

291
00:17:11.079 --> 00:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

292
00:17:11.319 --> 00:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>So, just to give you example, in Mark chapter six,

293
00:17:14.960 --> 00:17:18.920
<v Speaker 3>right when he comes walking on the sea and they

294
00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:21.960
<v Speaker 3>see him, they think he's a ghost, he says to them,

295
00:17:22.319 --> 00:17:26.880
<v Speaker 3>this is a Mark six, verse fifty, take heart, Ago

296
00:17:27.039 --> 00:17:30.279
<v Speaker 3>a me, do not be afraid, right So take heart

297
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I am, do not fear, do not be afraid right now,

298
00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>as I show in Jesus of my Christology, it's not

299
00:17:38.200 --> 00:17:43.559
<v Speaker 3>just Christian apologists I've got. It's Jewish scholars, unreligious scholars, Protestants,

300
00:17:43.799 --> 00:17:47.799
<v Speaker 3>Catholics alike, recognizing that on the narrative level, at the

301
00:17:47.880 --> 00:17:51.400
<v Speaker 3>very least, Okay, the ago of me here is not

302
00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:55.640
<v Speaker 3>just an identification. It is doing that, okay, Because he's

303
00:17:55.720 --> 00:17:57.799
<v Speaker 3>just told you they think he's a ghost. There is

304
00:17:57.839 --> 00:18:01.480
<v Speaker 3>a mistaken identity element taking place, and he is saying

305
00:18:01.559 --> 00:18:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Ago and me it is I. That's not an illegitimate translation.

306
00:18:05.519 --> 00:18:10.319
<v Speaker 3>But that's not all that's happening, because the context is Theophanic, right,

307
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>it'd be one thing to just.

308
00:18:11.680 --> 00:18:15.039
<v Speaker 1>Say, Okay, guys, this is really cool and I'm nervous

309
00:18:15.079 --> 00:18:17.799
<v Speaker 1>because my computer's glitching, so hopefully it's coming through normal

310
00:18:17.839 --> 00:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on the recording. The I am statement is important, you know,

311
00:18:26.079 --> 00:18:30.519
<v Speaker 1>because this is how Yahweh tells Moses I believe, like,

312
00:18:30.759 --> 00:18:33.519
<v Speaker 1>who should I tell sent me? And he says, tell

313
00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:36.839
<v Speaker 1>tell them that I am sent to you, like tell

314
00:18:36.880 --> 00:18:40.599
<v Speaker 1>them that being itself sent to you. This is this

315
00:18:40.680 --> 00:18:44.559
<v Speaker 1>is how God communicates his name to people in the

316
00:18:44.599 --> 00:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. And so this is why in John when

317
00:18:49.039 --> 00:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know, before Abraham was I am. You know,

318
00:18:53.480 --> 00:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone basically understands that this is the vine claim. However,

319
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't act actually technically use the same word son.

320
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:09.279
<v Speaker 1>You heard him say ago ami you know I am.

321
00:19:09.640 --> 00:19:15.519
<v Speaker 1>This is not actually and I don't know the Hebrew word.

322
00:19:15.799 --> 00:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a little tricky because like we don't you know,

323
00:19:18.519 --> 00:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Jesus wasn't speaking Hebrew, so we don't actually know what

324
00:19:22.039 --> 00:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>word he used. This is being written in Greek most likely,

325
00:19:27.559 --> 00:19:30.559
<v Speaker 1>so it could just be a translation thing I believe.

326
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But the atheist claim is he's actually using a slightly

327
00:19:34.440 --> 00:19:38.319
<v Speaker 1>different word. However, you can kind of settle this argument,

328
00:19:38.359 --> 00:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>which is the point he's about to make, because if

329
00:19:40.759 --> 00:19:44.799
<v Speaker 1>he's making the divine claim in the context of something

330
00:19:44.839 --> 00:19:48.599
<v Speaker 1>that only God can do, it seems to suggest that

331
00:19:48.640 --> 00:19:51.279
<v Speaker 1>he's making a divine claim. Right, So in this case,

332
00:19:51.279 --> 00:19:55.079
<v Speaker 1>he's walking on water. So let's uh, he'll he'll do

333
00:19:55.119 --> 00:19:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a much better job explaining. I just wanted to set

334
00:19:57.680 --> 00:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you up a little bit.

335
00:19:59.079 --> 00:20:01.400
<v Speaker 3>It's me if you know, you stumble across someone in

336
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:03.039
<v Speaker 3>the dark and you don't know who it is, and

337
00:20:03.079 --> 00:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>he says, I am okay, fine, no numinous divine implications.

338
00:20:06.759 --> 00:20:10.119
<v Speaker 3>But he's walking on the water when he says ago

339
00:20:10.119 --> 00:20:12.759
<v Speaker 3>and me, and he adds to it. And this is important.

340
00:20:13.200 --> 00:20:19.519
<v Speaker 3>The standard Theophanic statement mayfol based that Greek, do not

341
00:20:19.599 --> 00:20:22.000
<v Speaker 3>be afraid. Don't be afraid. This is what happens over

342
00:20:22.039 --> 00:20:23.680
<v Speaker 3>and over again the Old Testament when a he.

343
00:20:24.119 --> 00:20:26.279
<v Speaker 1>This is so key man, this is so to me.

344
00:20:26.359 --> 00:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>This just totally undercuts the argument. You know, he's saying,

345
00:20:29.920 --> 00:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>do not be afraid. This is the standard thing that

346
00:20:34.039 --> 00:20:38.599
<v Speaker 1>heavenly beings say to humans the first time they encountered

347
00:20:38.599 --> 00:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a human, kind of suggesting that they're terrifying. So he says,

348
00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:46.559
<v Speaker 1>do not be afraid I am he says God's name,

349
00:20:47.279 --> 00:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and you could say, okay, really he's saying it is I,

350
00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:53.319
<v Speaker 1>because both of those are appropriate translations of ago em.

351
00:20:54.119 --> 00:20:57.599
<v Speaker 1>But he just said do not be afraid, an angelic greeting,

352
00:20:57.839 --> 00:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's literally standing on water when he says it.

353
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:04.599
<v Speaker 1>It's like, come on, like how like okay, you can

354
00:21:04.680 --> 00:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>argue about whether or not you believe this happened. But

355
00:21:07.759 --> 00:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to argue that Jesus isn't even implying you know that

356
00:21:13.039 --> 00:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>he is God or he is at least an aspect

357
00:21:15.240 --> 00:21:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of God, to me, I think that's like a little petulant, maybe,

358
00:21:19.359 --> 00:21:21.079
<v Speaker 1>like you're being like a little stubborn.

359
00:21:21.400 --> 00:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Heavenly being comes down, whether it's the Lord or whether it's

360
00:21:23.960 --> 00:21:27.759
<v Speaker 3>an angelic figure, the normal human response is fear and trembling. Right,

361
00:21:28.200 --> 00:21:32.759
<v Speaker 3>So in this case, Jesus both identifies himself allays their fears.

362
00:21:32.799 --> 00:21:35.880
<v Speaker 3>But then also, in my opinion and an opinion of

363
00:21:35.880 --> 00:21:43.319
<v Speaker 3>lots of scholars, takes the numinous divine epithet Aegoimi I

364
00:21:43.359 --> 00:21:45.640
<v Speaker 3>am or I am he who is, which is an

365
00:21:45.640 --> 00:21:48.759
<v Speaker 3>allusion to Exodus three, the kind of paradigmatic theophany in

366
00:21:48.799 --> 00:21:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament in which God reveals his name to

367
00:21:53.599 --> 00:21:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the Israelites. It's a revelation of not just what he is,

368
00:21:58.200 --> 00:22:02.359
<v Speaker 3>but who he is, uncreated creator, the one who has

369
00:22:02.359 --> 00:22:04.160
<v Speaker 3>no beginning, who has no end. He's not just the

370
00:22:04.160 --> 00:22:06.559
<v Speaker 3>God of the mountain or the god of the river's

371
00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:09.680
<v Speaker 3>he's He's the God who is. And so he takes

372
00:22:09.720 --> 00:22:13.720
<v Speaker 3>that name as his own. That is something that I

373
00:22:13.720 --> 00:22:15.640
<v Speaker 3>think you see not only Mark six, but also in

374
00:22:15.720 --> 00:22:18.599
<v Speaker 3>John eight aty eight when Jesus says or Abraham was

375
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:23.559
<v Speaker 3>a go a me same thing a a declaration that

376
00:22:23.599 --> 00:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>has no predicate, right, doesn't say I am God. It's

377
00:22:27.039 --> 00:22:29.400
<v Speaker 3>just non predicted.

378
00:22:29.359 --> 00:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>The trial as well in Mark's version, right.

379
00:22:31.640 --> 00:22:33.400
<v Speaker 3>In Marx version, although it's not in the other. So

380
00:22:33.480 --> 00:22:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't make too much day out of that. In

381
00:22:35.720 --> 00:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>the I was trying to focus on the triple tradition.

382
00:22:38.160 --> 00:22:41.920
<v Speaker 3>So you're right though, But that's the answer to a question, right,

383
00:22:42.039 --> 00:22:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's also important. Like the meaning a go a

384
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:47.119
<v Speaker 3>me I am is going to have is going to

385
00:22:47.160 --> 00:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>be determined by context. It would be wrong for, for example,

386
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Christian apologist to say whenever someone says a go amy,

387
00:22:54.759 --> 00:22:57.680
<v Speaker 3>they're claiming to be divine. Because the blind man says

388
00:22:57.680 --> 00:23:01.640
<v Speaker 3>it in John chapter nine or ten, that's right, it's nine, yeah,

389
00:23:01.640 --> 00:23:04.640
<v Speaker 3>because they're asking, hey, is this the same guy or not? Right,

390
00:23:04.720 --> 00:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>he's different than he was, and he says I am,

391
00:23:07.759 --> 00:23:09.599
<v Speaker 3>which clearly means yes, it's me.

392
00:23:10.519 --> 00:23:14.839
<v Speaker 2>But the context also warns warns his followers, like in

393
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:18.880
<v Speaker 2>March chapter thirteen, he says, beware that no one leaves

394
00:23:18.880 --> 00:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you astray. Some many will come in my name and

395
00:23:21.480 --> 00:23:24.759
<v Speaker 2>say I am he like ego amy and will lead

396
00:23:24.799 --> 00:23:26.839
<v Speaker 2>you astray. So clearly, just the usage of this name

397
00:23:26.920 --> 00:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>is not necessarily an invocation of divinity, just to be

398
00:23:29.519 --> 00:23:32.680
<v Speaker 2>clear for our listeners here, right, So, so ego amy

399
00:23:32.839 --> 00:23:35.359
<v Speaker 2>is is a Greek phrase which is used in the Gospels.

400
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:38.079
<v Speaker 2>The Gospels a written in Greek. The Old Testament is

401
00:23:38.119 --> 00:23:42.920
<v Speaker 2>written in Hebrew. Ego Amy translates roughly as I am

402
00:23:43.319 --> 00:23:46.599
<v Speaker 2>ego as an ego you know, yeah, so it's so,

403
00:23:46.599 --> 00:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>it's I am. But it is also sort of used

404
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:51.279
<v Speaker 2>more colloquially to say something like it's me.

405
00:23:51.400 --> 00:23:51.480
<v Speaker 3>So.

406
00:23:51.759 --> 00:23:53.960
<v Speaker 2>A good example is the blind man in chapter in

407
00:23:54.039 --> 00:23:56.559
<v Speaker 2>John nine, they say, you know, is this not the

408
00:23:56.559 --> 00:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>man who was born blind? And he goes ego amy, Yeah, yeah,

409
00:23:59.480 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>it's it's right. But the difficulty is that in the

410
00:24:03.119 --> 00:24:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Book of Exodus, when Moses asks God what his name is,

411
00:24:07.640 --> 00:24:10.440
<v Speaker 2>God says, what would it be like asher yet.

412
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Commercial? But yeah, he's getting ready to make this the

413
00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>same point. But the thing is that these are different languages,

414
00:24:20.119 --> 00:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how key this is, you know,

415
00:24:23.400 --> 00:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like how big? But maybe I don't remember, and he's

416
00:24:26.519 --> 00:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about to destroy the argument. Let's find out.

417
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I am, I was, I will be who

418
00:24:36.279 --> 00:24:39.119
<v Speaker 3>I will be? Like it is a it is a

419
00:24:40.480 --> 00:24:43.599
<v Speaker 3>put it. It's an enigmatic Hebrew phrase in itself, like

420
00:24:43.640 --> 00:24:45.680
<v Speaker 3>it bears multiple translations and.

421
00:24:45.720 --> 00:24:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Means which would again kind of means something like I

422
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>am who I am, or I am that I am right,

423
00:24:52.240 --> 00:24:54.039
<v Speaker 2>And then he says, so go and tell them that

424
00:24:54.240 --> 00:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I Am has sent you, and so he gives his

425
00:24:56.799 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 2>name as I am. Of course the new Tessim's written

426
00:24:59.279 --> 00:25:02.839
<v Speaker 2>in a different language, but I am in Greek is

427
00:25:02.839 --> 00:25:05.759
<v Speaker 2>ego amy. So sometimes it does seem like when Jesus

428
00:25:05.799 --> 00:25:07.960
<v Speaker 2>says it, especially in like John chapter eight, when he

429
00:25:08.000 --> 00:25:11.160
<v Speaker 2>says weirdly with a weird grammar, you know, before Abraham

430
00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:14.160
<v Speaker 2>was I am. It seems like such a sort of

431
00:25:14.279 --> 00:25:16.880
<v Speaker 2>intentional usage of that phrase that people say it's a callback,

432
00:25:16.920 --> 00:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's complicated by the fact that it is also

433
00:25:19.680 --> 00:25:22.559
<v Speaker 2>a phrase that people do sometimes just use to identify themselves.

434
00:25:22.759 --> 00:25:27.319
<v Speaker 2>So here importantly the Gospels themselves. If you read John

435
00:25:27.400 --> 00:25:28.920
<v Speaker 2>chapter eight fifty eight.

436
00:25:29.039 --> 00:25:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I just want to point something out. You know, Alex

437
00:25:31.839 --> 00:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>will have these conversations with people who don't know much

438
00:25:36.000 --> 00:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like this guy, and you can imagine him crafting like

439
00:25:39.119 --> 00:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a much more devastating critique of Jesus's divine claim if

440
00:25:44.240 --> 00:25:48.079
<v Speaker 1>there's not a very intelligent theologian to be like, yeah, sure,

441
00:25:48.640 --> 00:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, yeah, people say I am all the time,

442
00:25:51.480 --> 00:25:54.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a border to remember that God's name

443
00:25:54.400 --> 00:25:58.039
<v Speaker 1>is I am. And when you are using the word

444
00:25:58.079 --> 00:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I am in a strange way, like before Abraham was

445
00:26:01.079 --> 00:26:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I am, you know that's clearly a divine claim. When

446
00:26:06.839 --> 00:26:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you're saying it as you walk on water after you

447
00:26:10.359 --> 00:26:14.039
<v Speaker 1>said do not be afraid, you're clearly using it in

448
00:26:14.079 --> 00:26:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the divine what you know what I mean. But you know,

449
00:26:17.400 --> 00:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know anything about like the gospel story

450
00:26:20.680 --> 00:26:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, which is often who Alex is being interviewed by.

451
00:26:23.839 --> 00:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen I've seen clips of him on other people's

452
00:26:27.200 --> 00:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>shows and I'm like, Oh, like, I guess, I guess

453
00:26:30.599 --> 00:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Jesus never claimed to be God, you know what I mean.

454
00:26:33.039 --> 00:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>So I would encourage you if you have like a

455
00:26:36.359 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of preconceived notions, like if you kind of feel like,

456
00:26:40.680 --> 00:26:45.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, the story of Jesus has been thoroughly debunked,

457
00:26:45.759 --> 00:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't necessarily there's certain things that can neither

458
00:26:48.279 --> 00:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be proven or not proven, right, but there are other

459
00:26:50.799 --> 00:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>things that perhaps could be disproven. You know, it could

460
00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be that, you know, Moses is writing about Abraham and

461
00:26:58.960 --> 00:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>he's describing cities that didn't exist. Yet someone could have

462
00:27:02.400 --> 00:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>told you that you could watch a video and you'd go, oh,

463
00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:08.279
<v Speaker 1>this is completely discredited, not knowing that there are other

464
00:27:08.519 --> 00:27:11.759
<v Speaker 1>very legitimate scholars who have very good rebuttals and arguments

465
00:27:11.759 --> 00:27:15.079
<v Speaker 1>against this. So again, I would encourage you if you

466
00:27:15.200 --> 00:27:19.759
<v Speaker 1>feel like things have been debunked, maybe just accept like

467
00:27:20.839 --> 00:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent person trying to make a point without an

468
00:27:26.440 --> 00:27:30.799
<v Speaker 1>intelligent counterpoint maker sitting next to them can really like

469
00:27:30.880 --> 00:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of damage on your knowledge of a subject,

470
00:27:33.839 --> 00:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is what happens with flat earth all the time.

471
00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:38.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get some guy who knows a lot

472
00:27:38.559 --> 00:27:41.759
<v Speaker 1>about the flat earth argument, says things no one else

473
00:27:41.880 --> 00:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is around to be like, well, actually no that's not true.

474
00:27:44.759 --> 00:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what you just said isn't true. You know,

475
00:27:48.400 --> 00:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>someone just speaks with authority. It can be pretty convincing.

476
00:27:52.680 --> 00:27:56.519
<v Speaker 1>So I just kind of maybe if you are an agnostic,

477
00:27:56.599 --> 00:28:00.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of just reflect back on the arguments you've heard,

478
00:28:00.279 --> 00:28:03.599
<v Speaker 1>the things you've heard it, maybe just like take some

479
00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of it with the grain of salt. Like I'm not

480
00:28:05.839 --> 00:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>saying like everything you've ever heard is wrong. I'm not

481
00:28:07.920 --> 00:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that, but sort of re examine your current prejudicial

482
00:28:12.640 --> 00:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>biases and maybe be open to re examining them.

483
00:28:16.559 --> 00:28:19.519
<v Speaker 2>Eight. You know, verse verse fifty eight. They translate it

484
00:28:19.599 --> 00:28:22.559
<v Speaker 2>usually as before Abraham was I am right? But on

485
00:28:22.599 --> 00:28:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the walking in the water, most Biblical translations read the

486
00:28:25.240 --> 00:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>NIV or whatever. I'm not sure where the NRSV does,

487
00:28:27.240 --> 00:28:30.559
<v Speaker 2>but it translates it as it's me, even though it's

488
00:28:30.559 --> 00:28:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the same phrase.

489
00:28:31.559 --> 00:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I should just point out this is maybe a translation issue.

490
00:28:35.279 --> 00:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The original word is ego at me.

491
00:28:37.519 --> 00:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, because contextually it seems like he

492
00:28:40.319 --> 00:28:42.880
<v Speaker 2>is just identifying himself. But you're saying that in the

493
00:28:42.920 --> 00:28:46.559
<v Speaker 2>context of walking on the water, it takes on a

494
00:28:46.640 --> 00:28:49.359
<v Speaker 2>great deal of significance to use that identify.

495
00:28:49.039 --> 00:28:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I would qualified. I would just say I don't think

496
00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the word just is correct. Yes, he's identifying himself, but

497
00:28:55.240 --> 00:28:58.559
<v Speaker 3>he's not just identifying himself. And the way you know

498
00:28:58.680 --> 00:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>that is from the context, because in this context he's

499
00:29:03.279 --> 00:29:06.119
<v Speaker 3>walking on the water, which if you look in Job

500
00:29:06.359 --> 00:29:09.599
<v Speaker 3>chapter nine, for example, this is something that Hebrew scripture

501
00:29:09.640 --> 00:29:15.319
<v Speaker 3>says only God does. Only God walks on the waves.

502
00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:19.000
<v Speaker 3>In fact, in the Subtuagen translation of Job nine, it

503
00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:23.720
<v Speaker 3>says that God walks on the waves as on dry land. Right,

504
00:29:23.920 --> 00:29:28.839
<v Speaker 3>So this is something that Jewish scripture makes a divine attribute.

505
00:29:28.920 --> 00:29:30.799
<v Speaker 3>And then this was really cool in the book. I'm

506
00:29:30.799 --> 00:29:32.839
<v Speaker 3>sure you saw this part. It's also something in a

507
00:29:32.880 --> 00:29:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Greco Roman context was perceived as a divine power because

508
00:29:37.000 --> 00:29:43.480
<v Speaker 3>in the first century, when Caligula wants to manifest his divinity.

509
00:29:43.599 --> 00:29:45.480
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the strange things about Caligula. One

510
00:29:45.519 --> 00:29:47.119
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons a lot of Romans thought he was

511
00:29:47.160 --> 00:29:49.880
<v Speaker 3>crazy is because he didn't wait to divinize himself until

512
00:29:49.920 --> 00:29:52.640
<v Speaker 3>he was dead. That's perfectly acceptable. Once you're dead, you

513
00:29:52.680 --> 00:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>can be divinized. But he wanted divine claims and divine

514
00:29:55.920 --> 00:29:57.799
<v Speaker 3>attributes to be give to him while he was alive.

515
00:29:57.839 --> 00:29:59.160
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of people said he you know, he

516
00:29:59.240 --> 00:30:03.599
<v Speaker 3>was crazy. But uh, and Josephus and in Suetonius we

517
00:30:04.240 --> 00:30:07.640
<v Speaker 3>hear no Stonius Sutonius tells Us about how in order

518
00:30:07.680 --> 00:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>to manifest his divinity, he builds a bridge across the

519
00:30:12.200 --> 00:30:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Bay of Biah and then rides across it on a

520
00:30:14.519 --> 00:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>chariot as befitted his godhead. Right, So the idea that

521
00:30:18.279 --> 00:30:21.359
<v Speaker 3>he that he can cross the sea, and this is

522
00:30:21.400 --> 00:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>just one example, there are others as well. Is both

523
00:30:23.880 --> 00:30:28.319
<v Speaker 3>in Jewish and Greco Roman context, a divine power, a

524
00:30:28.400 --> 00:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>divine attribute, it's something superhuman. And so when in that

525
00:30:32.799 --> 00:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>context Jesus says, ag a me may fow base it.

526
00:30:35.960 --> 00:30:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to do not fear either too. That's this

527
00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:40.880
<v Speaker 3>is that language. So you brought up Exodus three, but

528
00:30:40.920 --> 00:30:43.799
<v Speaker 3>it's not just Sexust three, it's Isaiah forty three. When

529
00:30:43.920 --> 00:30:46.680
<v Speaker 3>God speaks I am God, there is no other He

530
00:30:46.759 --> 00:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>reutilizes the language of I am and I am he,

531
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the same Hebrew language from from the Book of Exus.

532
00:30:53.200 --> 00:30:55.839
<v Speaker 3>But then he also says do not fear. So Jesus

533
00:30:55.880 --> 00:30:58.640
<v Speaker 3>isn't just alluding Exodus three. In the Burning Bush. He's

534
00:30:58.680 --> 00:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>also alluding to the most on a theistic passage in

535
00:31:01.559 --> 00:31:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah about the power of the One Creator God of Israel.

536
00:31:05.880 --> 00:31:08.599
<v Speaker 3>So in that and he does it while he's walking

537
00:31:08.720 --> 00:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>on the water, right, So that's important, right. Context matters

538
00:31:12.559 --> 00:31:14.160
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this, as I like to joke

539
00:31:14.160 --> 00:31:16.839
<v Speaker 3>with my students whenever we would go through this when

540
00:31:16.839 --> 00:31:18.799
<v Speaker 3>we talk about this in the In the Gospel John,

541
00:31:18.880 --> 00:31:21.559
<v Speaker 3>I think I noted this. It says that he that

542
00:31:21.599 --> 00:31:25.119
<v Speaker 3>they're four miles from the shore, because Steve Galiley's about

543
00:31:25.160 --> 00:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>seven miles wide at the widest point. And so I

544
00:31:27.480 --> 00:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>would joke with the students and I said, listen, if

545
00:31:29.440 --> 00:31:31.759
<v Speaker 3>he didn't know he was God by mile one, he

546
00:31:31.839 --> 00:31:35.079
<v Speaker 3>probably figured it out by mile four, right, Like this

547
00:31:35.119 --> 00:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>is this is not just uh, this is not just

548
00:31:39.599 --> 00:31:44.519
<v Speaker 3>a identification of it's me. It's also a theophanic revelation.

549
00:31:44.559 --> 00:31:47.119
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's called on an epiphany miracle of the

550
00:31:47.160 --> 00:31:51.279
<v Speaker 3>mystery of his identity that he is claiming he's using

551
00:31:51.319 --> 00:31:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the name of the One God from the Book of

552
00:31:54.400 --> 00:31:58.039
<v Speaker 3>Exodus and from Isaiah. And the context shows that that's true.

553
00:31:58.039 --> 00:32:00.839
<v Speaker 3>In John aid as well, because the response of his

554
00:32:00.960 --> 00:32:04.519
<v Speaker 3>contemporaries is to pick up a stone and to stone

555
00:32:04.599 --> 00:32:07.559
<v Speaker 3>him to death. And they say, we stone you for

556
00:32:07.640 --> 00:32:11.519
<v Speaker 3>no unrighteous work, because you, though a man, make yourself

557
00:32:11.799 --> 00:32:12.599
<v Speaker 3>God right.

558
00:32:12.599 --> 00:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, he says that, and that's that's John chapter ten.

559
00:32:14.960 --> 00:32:16.039
<v Speaker 2>When they respond that way.

560
00:32:15.880 --> 00:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, I say eight. I apologize, Yeah.

561
00:32:18.759 --> 00:32:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Joe chaps ten. You're talking about whether because they pick

562
00:32:21.119 --> 00:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>up stones in John A as well.

563
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:26.640
<v Speaker 3>So yes, so the but the stoning in John A

564
00:32:26.720 --> 00:32:30.079
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight? Uh, John ay fann So they took up

565
00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>stones to throw at him. The death by stoning is

566
00:32:34.039 --> 00:32:38.759
<v Speaker 3>in Leviticus and in Josephus. That is the that's the legal,

567
00:32:39.480 --> 00:32:43.440
<v Speaker 3>legally prescribed manner of execution for blasphemy. So although the

568
00:32:43.440 --> 00:32:46.960
<v Speaker 3>word blasphemy doesn't come the the implication is that they're

569
00:32:46.960 --> 00:32:50.880
<v Speaker 3>stoning him because he's blasphemed and in context blasphemy.

570
00:32:50.920 --> 00:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I just realized we have not really addressed the

571
00:32:54.079 --> 00:32:57.359
<v Speaker 1>disciple of John the baptisting. Although I guess you could

572
00:32:57.400 --> 00:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>say this sort of isn't it. You are addressing it, right,

573
00:33:00.599 --> 00:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you are, if you are showing that

574
00:33:02.519 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is claiming to be God, then clearly he's not

575
00:33:05.000 --> 00:33:10.319
<v Speaker 1>just a disciple. Although you know Jesus certainly thought very

576
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:13.119
<v Speaker 1>highly of John the Baptist. He said, you know, he's

577
00:33:13.160 --> 00:33:17.119
<v Speaker 1>basically the greatest man there is on earth. So so

578
00:33:17.839 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they were close, and they obviously had very similar messages

579
00:33:22.720 --> 00:33:26.799
<v Speaker 1>than beliefs. But so I'm realizing I introduced this episode

580
00:33:26.839 --> 00:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as a John the Baptist disciple rebuttal, and that's not

581
00:33:31.279 --> 00:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>actually what this is. This is much more about the

582
00:33:33.240 --> 00:33:35.119
<v Speaker 1>ago of me claim. But we have about a few

583
00:33:35.119 --> 00:33:37.599
<v Speaker 1>minutes left, and uh, I think I'll just let it

584
00:33:37.680 --> 00:33:38.799
<v Speaker 1>run out and then we'll wrap up.

585
00:33:39.039 --> 00:33:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean a lot of different things, like you can

586
00:33:40.400 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 3>speak against the temple, you can speak against the priesthood.

587
00:33:43.880 --> 00:33:47.319
<v Speaker 3>One soldier got executed by the Rome procubator Kamanis because

588
00:33:47.319 --> 00:33:49.279
<v Speaker 3>he was ripped up copies of the Torah, so he

589
00:33:49.359 --> 00:33:52.079
<v Speaker 3>like desecrated a sacred object and they said he had.

590
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:54.880
<v Speaker 3>He also said he uttered blasphemies. So blast week and

591
00:33:54.920 --> 00:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of different meanings. But one of them is

592
00:33:56.720 --> 00:34:01.160
<v Speaker 3>making a divine claim. And before that, the penalty is death,

593
00:34:01.319 --> 00:34:04.559
<v Speaker 3>not just death, but death by stone. So again in

594
00:34:04.640 --> 00:34:08.559
<v Speaker 3>context John eight, and I think Mark six, it's really

595
00:34:08.599 --> 00:34:11.039
<v Speaker 3>difficult for me to argue that those allusions to Isaiah

596
00:34:11.079 --> 00:34:13.880
<v Speaker 3>forty three and Exodus three are just coincidental. I think

597
00:34:13.920 --> 00:34:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they're more more significant, much more significant that they're intended

598
00:34:18.920 --> 00:34:21.960
<v Speaker 3>to help you see that he's making a divine claim

599
00:34:22.199 --> 00:34:25.480
<v Speaker 3>about who he is, because remember the name in Judaism.

600
00:34:25.719 --> 00:34:29.519
<v Speaker 3>It reveals not just your role in salvation history like Abraham,

601
00:34:29.599 --> 00:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, father multitude, it also reveals your identity, like

602
00:34:32.079 --> 00:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>who are you? And that's something I don't see any

603
00:34:34.440 --> 00:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of the apostles ever saying a goo a me I

604
00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:39.119
<v Speaker 3>am in that kind of context. So I would say

605
00:34:39.119 --> 00:34:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that's something that is actually distinctive in addition to the powers.

606
00:34:42.480 --> 00:34:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Does that help this absolutely?

607
00:34:44.559 --> 00:34:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And there's so much to say that. I mean,

608
00:34:48.519 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 2>it's it's really difficult to have this conversation actually because

609
00:34:53.400 --> 00:34:56.320
<v Speaker 2>especially like on YouTube when my comment section is flooded

610
00:34:56.320 --> 00:34:58.519
<v Speaker 2>by Christians, It's like, if we spend ten minutes talking

611
00:34:58.559 --> 00:35:00.679
<v Speaker 2>about the Son of Man, then all the comments will

612
00:35:00.719 --> 00:35:03.119
<v Speaker 2>say he was literally stoned for blasphemy. It's like, okay,

613
00:35:03.119 --> 00:35:05.199
<v Speaker 2>then we'll spend half an hour talking about blasphemy, and

614
00:35:05.239 --> 00:35:07.320
<v Speaker 2>then it's like he said I am, and then okay,

615
00:35:07.320 --> 00:35:08.679
<v Speaker 2>well let's talk about that. And it's like, but he

616
00:35:08.679 --> 00:35:10.320
<v Speaker 2>said that he's one with the Father, so we have

617
00:35:10.360 --> 00:35:11.639
<v Speaker 2>to take these one by one, right.

618
00:35:11.599 --> 00:35:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And so it's really important to look at in

619
00:35:13.920 --> 00:35:18.639
<v Speaker 3>each case what is the nature of the divinity to

620
00:35:18.679 --> 00:35:22.960
<v Speaker 3>which he's laying claying right. So not every passage that

621
00:35:23.039 --> 00:35:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I looked at in the book has the same degree

622
00:35:26.159 --> 00:35:30.239
<v Speaker 3>or kind of divine power or identity as the other.

623
00:35:30.360 --> 00:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So I really tried to be a career divine in

624
00:35:33.079 --> 00:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>what sense in this passage, divine in what sense in

625
00:35:36.039 --> 00:35:39.239
<v Speaker 3>another passage. And it is a cumulative argument. It's not

626
00:35:39.440 --> 00:35:42.079
<v Speaker 3>just that one passage is kind of settled the whole

627
00:35:42.079 --> 00:35:43.320
<v Speaker 3>thing that's mine.

628
00:35:43.360 --> 00:35:47.960
<v Speaker 2>So looking at what you've said about about the walking

629
00:35:48.000 --> 00:35:50.719
<v Speaker 2>in the water, and of course, although I am of

630
00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:53.599
<v Speaker 2>my opinion of you know, localstology and all that, sure,

631
00:35:53.840 --> 00:35:56.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm I'm I'm pretty I've got no skin

632
00:35:56.599 --> 00:35:58.800
<v Speaker 2>in this game, you know, don't I don't. I don't mind.

633
00:35:58.880 --> 00:36:02.119
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's interesting, but I'm not gonna die

634
00:36:02.159 --> 00:36:02.960
<v Speaker 2>on this hill or anything.

635
00:36:04.039 --> 00:36:06.440
<v Speaker 3>One quick point on that just of course disregard. So

636
00:36:06.480 --> 00:36:07.880
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I did in the book was,

637
00:36:08.519 --> 00:36:10.719
<v Speaker 3>like I tried to quote scholars who didn't have skin

638
00:36:10.800 --> 00:36:13.039
<v Speaker 3>in the game. For example, the famous Jesus seminar from

639
00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:14.599
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen nineties, that's when I was in school, and

640
00:36:14.599 --> 00:36:16.719
<v Speaker 3>they were really hot, really popular. Most of the scholars

641
00:36:16.760 --> 00:36:19.199
<v Speaker 3>are members of the seminar. Not all were either atheists

642
00:36:19.239 --> 00:36:21.519
<v Speaker 3>or gnostic not they weren't believers in the divinity of

643
00:36:21.559 --> 00:36:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Christ or the classic Christian creeds. But you know, when

644
00:36:23.880 --> 00:36:25.519
<v Speaker 3>they come to the Walking on the Sea, they say

645
00:36:25.599 --> 00:36:28.199
<v Speaker 3>he's alluding to Exos three, he's making a divine claim,

646
00:36:28.360 --> 00:36:30.840
<v Speaker 3>and they actually say he's acting like he's Poseidon or something.

647
00:36:30.880 --> 00:36:33.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so it's not just a kind of Christian

648
00:36:33.679 --> 00:36:36.599
<v Speaker 3>apologetic that interprets the text in that way. That's a

649
00:36:36.639 --> 00:36:39.599
<v Speaker 3>reasonable interpretation, even from a non Christian perspective.

650
00:36:39.800 --> 00:36:43.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, Yeah, I definitely think that it's a reasonable interpretation.

651
00:36:43.639 --> 00:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I'd never wish to imply otherwise. But there are some

652
00:36:47.039 --> 00:36:48.800
<v Speaker 2>reasons that give me pulse the thought on this, right,

653
00:36:48.840 --> 00:36:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean crucially firstly, right, like that the main grounding

654
00:36:51.960 --> 00:36:53.719
<v Speaker 2>for this walking on the water thing is, as you've

655
00:36:53.760 --> 00:36:57.920
<v Speaker 2>already said in Job chapter nine, he alone stretches out

656
00:36:57.960 --> 00:36:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the heavens and treads on the waves of the sea

657
00:37:00.159 --> 00:37:03.760
<v Speaker 2>like God alone treads on the waves. We're sort of

658
00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:06.079
<v Speaker 2>speaking poetically here, and of course it is Job who

659
00:37:06.119 --> 00:37:08.880
<v Speaker 2>is speaking and In the very next chapter of Job,

660
00:37:09.480 --> 00:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>while Job is sort of shouting to the heavens, he says,

661
00:37:11.760 --> 00:37:14.639
<v Speaker 2>does it please you to oppress me, to spurn the

662
00:37:14.679 --> 00:37:17.360
<v Speaker 2>work of your hands while you smile on the plans

663
00:37:17.360 --> 00:37:19.840
<v Speaker 2>of the wicked? He's angry at God, and he's saying

664
00:37:19.880 --> 00:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>all of these things about God which are untrue. Like

665
00:37:21.960 --> 00:37:23.599
<v Speaker 2>in the very next chapter to God, God is saying

666
00:37:23.639 --> 00:37:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that God smiles on the wicked. He's saying that he please,

667
00:37:26.000 --> 00:37:28.599
<v Speaker 2>He pleases in oppressing him. You know, he also says

668
00:37:28.599 --> 00:37:31.079
<v Speaker 2>that he'd wished he'd never been born. Job is sort

669
00:37:31.079 --> 00:37:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of this imperfect you know, theological authority at that time.

670
00:37:36.719 --> 00:37:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course, that doesn't mean that we can't sort of

671
00:37:38.800 --> 00:37:41.039
<v Speaker 2>poetically refer to Job, because people would know that phrase

672
00:37:41.079 --> 00:37:42.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't there. But I think it's worth pointing out that

673
00:37:42.920 --> 00:37:46.039
<v Speaker 2>this idea that you know, we have this we often say,

674
00:37:46.039 --> 00:37:48.559
<v Speaker 2>like it says in the Old Testament that probably God

675
00:37:48.559 --> 00:37:51.119
<v Speaker 2>does this. But it's important to know who's speaking and

676
00:37:51.199 --> 00:37:54.599
<v Speaker 2>in what context. In this context, Job is complaining and

677
00:37:55.000 --> 00:37:58.239
<v Speaker 2>basically basically blaspheming himself by saying all of these things

678
00:37:58.280 --> 00:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>about God which which aren't true.

679
00:38:00.079 --> 00:38:03.239
<v Speaker 3>He's angry, I agree, but I pushed back slightly. I

680
00:38:03.239 --> 00:38:05.199
<v Speaker 3>don't think you're right in the surrounding chapter or the

681
00:38:05.239 --> 00:38:07.599
<v Speaker 3>next chapter, that's true. But in John Joeb nine one

682
00:38:07.679 --> 00:38:09.920
<v Speaker 3>ro Ten in those verses there, one of the things

683
00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:12.360
<v Speaker 3>he's doing is saying, how can a man be just

684
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:16.119
<v Speaker 3>before God? And then he begins a poetic litany of

685
00:38:16.199 --> 00:38:19.800
<v Speaker 3>all of his attributes as creator. And I don't get

686
00:38:19.800 --> 00:38:22.599
<v Speaker 3>the sense from that particular context that he's calling any

687
00:38:22.679 --> 00:38:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of those into question. I actually think he's drawing a

688
00:38:26.000 --> 00:38:29.320
<v Speaker 3>contrast between the utter transcendence and indipotence of the Creator.

689
00:38:29.400 --> 00:38:32.000
<v Speaker 2>What's happening to That's that's how I read it. Yeah,

690
00:38:32.079 --> 00:38:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I think that's the perfect reading. I just

691
00:38:34.000 --> 00:38:36.840
<v Speaker 2>think it's or plausible reading. I just think it's worth

692
00:38:36.920 --> 00:38:37.639
<v Speaker 2>worth flagging that.

693
00:38:37.639 --> 00:38:41.480
<v Speaker 3>That's always dangers. Who just say the Old Testimate.

694
00:38:41.199 --> 00:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Says exactly, It's like, you know Muslims might do the

695
00:38:44.400 --> 00:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>same thing. Well, I could say, well, in the Book

696
00:38:45.880 --> 00:38:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of Job in fact, you know, you know it says

697
00:38:48.679 --> 00:38:50.559
<v Speaker 2>God is not a man that I might.

698
00:38:50.599 --> 00:38:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Sasties, right, you know, everything's vanity doesn't have any meaning.

699
00:38:54.119 --> 00:38:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Like okay, well, like yeah, you knows, do quote that?

700
00:38:58.480 --> 00:38:59.840
<v Speaker 2>By the way they quote the book of Joe where

701
00:39:00.119 --> 00:39:01.960
<v Speaker 2>God is not a man that I might question him,

702
00:39:02.000 --> 00:39:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, yeah, but this is this is job,

703
00:39:04.039 --> 00:39:06.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, and he's complaining and he doesn't and it's

704
00:39:06.519 --> 00:39:08.719
<v Speaker 2>poetic and it means it's obviously means something else in

705
00:39:08.760 --> 00:39:09.079
<v Speaker 2>that comment.

706
00:39:09.119 --> 00:39:11.199
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I tell you the examples of like

707
00:39:11.280 --> 00:39:13.800
<v Speaker 3>of Caligula constructing.

708
00:39:14.119 --> 00:39:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think we will end right there. So the

709
00:39:18.239 --> 00:39:20.159
<v Speaker 1>reason I think we'll end right there is that my

710
00:39:20.239 --> 00:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>computer actually died, so it's now twenty four hours later

711
00:39:24.039 --> 00:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future. I was recording that clip with Alex

712
00:39:28.760 --> 00:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and I still don't know the guy's name, the guy

713
00:39:30.920 --> 00:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who's defending the claim that Jesus claimed to be God.

714
00:39:36.760 --> 00:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That last thing you heard about Caliguila right there, that

715
00:39:39.519 --> 00:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was twenty four hours ago. So anyway, we're gonna wrap up.

716
00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to record some sort of outro so

717
00:39:45.719 --> 00:39:49.159
<v Speaker 1>it didn't just end. You know, in the twenty four

718
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:54.079
<v Speaker 1>hours since that last episode, I'm thinking this podcasting game, man,

719
00:39:54.599 --> 00:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I might be kind of coming

720
00:39:57.920 --> 00:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to the to the conclude usion. You know, at first,

721
00:40:03.440 --> 00:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I recorded like ten episodes and stopped, and the idea

722
00:40:07.440 --> 00:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was just for people who were thinking about buying the book,

723
00:40:10.079 --> 00:40:12.519
<v Speaker 1>or maybe bought the book and wanted to listen to

724
00:40:12.599 --> 00:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>something I'd have like this little companion thing. But after

725
00:40:16.519 --> 00:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>episode ten, I was like, I don't know, it's kind

726
00:40:18.840 --> 00:40:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of work. Well, we're coming up to

727
00:40:21.719 --> 00:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>episode one hundred. Now this is episode I think this

728
00:40:25.559 --> 00:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is like ninety five something like that. I'm kind of thinking, oh,

729
00:40:29.760 --> 00:40:32.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting that feeling again, so we'll see. I

730
00:40:32.639 --> 00:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think if I was going to continue, I would need to,

731
00:40:36.800 --> 00:40:40.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, invest in a little camera, set up my

732
00:40:40.119 --> 00:40:42.679
<v Speaker 1>office a little bit better, and do a YouTube because

733
00:40:42.719 --> 00:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is where all the eyeballs are. But I don't know.

734
00:40:47.559 --> 00:40:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I always say like, I'm not doing this

735
00:40:50.000 --> 00:40:53.159
<v Speaker 1>for people to listen. Really, I'm doing it for my

736
00:40:53.280 --> 00:40:58.679
<v Speaker 1>mental health so my kids can listen to, you know,

737
00:40:58.760 --> 00:41:01.679
<v Speaker 1>what I thought about what, you know, my grandkids maybe

738
00:41:01.840 --> 00:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what did what did Grandpa think about? Quantum physics? By then,

739
00:41:06.880 --> 00:41:12.119
<v Speaker 1>will either be subjugated to our Peter teel overlords or

740
00:41:12.159 --> 00:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>will be moved on from quantum physics. Probably it will

741
00:41:16.039 --> 00:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be quantum violent string theory or something. I don't know,

742
00:41:20.639 --> 00:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but that was kind of the motivation, Like why do

743
00:41:23.039 --> 00:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I do this thing that doesn't make any money, and

744
00:41:27.320 --> 00:41:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that was the reason. But now I'm like, maybe I've

745
00:41:29.880 --> 00:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I've done that, maybe I've accomplished that. So I

746
00:41:35.000 --> 00:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe it may be a co host to

747
00:41:37.440 --> 00:41:40.679
<v Speaker 1>make things easier, or maybe YouTube, or maybe we just

748
00:41:41.400 --> 00:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>call it a day and maybe I'll come back once

749
00:41:44.400 --> 00:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I write another book or something. I don't know. Let

750
00:41:46.440 --> 00:41:50.159
<v Speaker 1>me know what you think. So, without further ado, that

751
00:41:50.239 --> 00:41:53.639
<v Speaker 1>was part two of our Did Jesus Claim to Be God? Series?

752
00:41:55.159 --> 00:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Commenting on Alex Connor's interview, I thought it was pretty interesting.

753
00:41:59.440 --> 00:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought the is doing a pretty consistently good job

754
00:42:03.480 --> 00:42:07.519
<v Speaker 1>of making the case that Jesus did, in fact claim

755
00:42:08.079 --> 00:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to be God. Depending on what you mean by the

756
00:42:10.760 --> 00:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>word you know, if you mean did he claim to

757
00:42:13.239 --> 00:42:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be the Father in heaven, will know he didn't. And

758
00:42:15.800 --> 00:42:20.719
<v Speaker 1>there's you can find all sorts of quotes of Jesus'

759
00:42:20.719 --> 00:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Bible where he specifically distinguishes between himself and

760
00:42:25.039 --> 00:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Father. But if you take a more trinitarian view

761
00:42:28.440 --> 00:42:33.039
<v Speaker 1>of God, then yes, absolutely Jesus claimed to be the

762
00:42:33.039 --> 00:42:37.159
<v Speaker 1>son of God and the son of man, so he

763
00:42:37.320 --> 00:42:40.679
<v Speaker 1>was a divine figure in the form of a man,

764
00:42:40.760 --> 00:42:45.119
<v Speaker 1>fully human, fully God. So all right, everybody have a

765
00:42:45.159 --> 00:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>good weekend. Please email me at God's I view Book

766
00:42:47.920 --> 00:42:51.519
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com. Until next time, take care, stay safe,

767
00:42:51.559 --> 00:42:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and God bless
