Speaker 1: All right, welcome back and joining us for the first
Speaker 1: time post election, is Gerald slinty or things have really
Speaker 1: been happening? Fast Journal is where you can find his
Speaker 1: excellent publication weekly. He's got like three hundred pages or
Speaker 1: so of articles, no fluff in it, and it's like
Speaker 1: an online magazine. You can save ten percent off if
Speaker 1: you use the code night at trendsjournal dot com. Thank
Speaker 1: you for joining us, Jeryl.
Speaker 2: Oh, thanks for having me.
Speaker 3: And by the way, when you use the code, of course,
Speaker 3: you're the grand total of two dollars and fifty cents
Speaker 3: a week.
Speaker 4: That's great, that's great.
Speaker 3: The toilet paper Record, the New York Times four dollars
Speaker 3: a day. Wall Street Journal five dollars a day. We
Speaker 3: hardly get any trend value information from either of those papers,
Speaker 3: maybe one or two articles or of any value. It's
Speaker 3: so sad that journalism has died. And again you could
Speaker 3: thank that slime ball slick Will Clinton is nineteen ninety
Speaker 3: six Federal Communications Act when he digregulated the communications industry
Speaker 3: with thousands, thousands of independent radio stations and TV stations
Speaker 3: and newspapers. Now six companies controlled ninety two percent of
Speaker 3: the media.
Speaker 1: And sorous is going in and buying up a lot
Speaker 1: of radio stations and everything. It's not going to get
Speaker 1: any better any time soon.
Speaker 2: No, it's only getting worse.
Speaker 3: So anyway, we're giving people that you can't get anywhere
Speaker 3: else with trends. You know, I call the campaign wrong.
Speaker 3: I thought Harris was going to win, and we only
Speaker 3: go by data. You know, I'm a political atheist. I
Speaker 3: don't believe in any of the parties. It's a crime syndicate.
Speaker 3: I mean, you saw the covers of the Trends Journal.
Speaker 3: You know it was the Disney presidential reality show, one
Speaker 3: of them, Mini Mouse Verse, Donald Duck, your numb Skulls
Speaker 3: Race to the White House. We had both of them.
Speaker 3: It's not like I liked any of them. But we
Speaker 3: go by the data. So let's go back to twenty
Speaker 3: twenty two. Inflation was at nine percent midterm elections. Biden's
Speaker 3: poll ratings are in the toilet where he belongs. We
Speaker 3: said the Republicans this Ala May. The elections are in November.
Speaker 3: Alam Ay, Trends Journal. We said that the Republicans who
Speaker 3: are not going to do well despite this because of
Speaker 3: their anti abortion stance. Again, not like what you want,
Speaker 3: what you like, what your wish for what's what is
Speaker 3: And we said Harris is going to hit the campaign
Speaker 3: trail because of Biden's unpopularity.
Speaker 2: That's what we said back in twenty twenty and two May.
Speaker 3: They lost, the Republicans did terrible because of abortion. We
Speaker 3: thought that would be a big issue again, and so
Speaker 3: too did the Harris campaign.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was all of her campaign basically.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 2: Yeah, as the polls showed.
Speaker 3: Only fourteen percent of the people were concerned about abortion.
Speaker 3: This time, as the saying goes, it's the economy stupid. Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 3: let's go to yesterday the Fed had Jerome Palells said
Speaker 3: we're not sure about what we're going to be doing
Speaker 3: with interest rates because the economy is so strong. Wait
Speaker 3: a minute, I thought the economy. I thought Trump won
Speaker 3: because of the weak economy for the working class. Again,
Speaker 3: we go by the data. The data was showing that
Speaker 3: consumer confidence in the four months leading up to the
Speaker 3: campaign and then the last one right before the campaign
Speaker 3: was the highest in four years. That's according to the data.
Speaker 3: Number two. So we thought that Harris would get a
Speaker 3: vast majority of the women vote. Well, let's see, we said,
Speaker 3: And since Harris is a woman and sixty four percent
Speaker 3: of women say abortion should be legal, according to the Gallipol.
Speaker 3: We believed it would again be a major issue, and
Speaker 3: so did the grim Credit part it didn't. Women votes
Speaker 3: for Harris were below President Joe Biden's count in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty and Hillary Clinton's in twenty sixteen. She was down
Speaker 3: five percent of the women's votes from Biden and down
Speaker 3: thirteen percent from Clinton. We had no idea that that
Speaker 3: was going to happen. Then again, people say she's not black. Again,
Speaker 3: I don't care what people say. According to what she says.
Speaker 3: If you go to the White House thing and you
Speaker 3: read what she says, she says that she said that
Speaker 3: she's a let me get the exact quote here.
Speaker 1: That well, of course she was an Indian and proud
Speaker 1: of it and bragging about it a few years ago
Speaker 1: and everything with the year. Yeah, just like they all
Speaker 1: flip on policies, she flipped on her ethnicity.
Speaker 3: She said she is quote the first woman, the first
Speaker 3: Black American, and the first South Asian American to be
Speaker 3: elected vice president. So this is so anyway, we thought
Speaker 3: she'd get the black vote. So here's the numbers. When
Speaker 3: Biden ran in twenty twenty he got eighty seven percent
Speaker 3: of the black men's.
Speaker 2: Vote and.
Speaker 3: Harris only got seventy eight percent. When Biden ran, he
Speaker 3: got ninety five percent of a black women vote. She
Speaker 3: got ninety two percent. Again, she's Jamaican. We thought she'd
Speaker 3: get the Latino vote. Didn't happen. Let's see, her twenty
Speaker 3: two percent gain over Trump was lower than Biden's thirty
Speaker 3: nine percent lead when he ran against Trump in twenty
Speaker 3: twenty with Latino vote.
Speaker 2: So again we called it.
Speaker 3: Wrong, but we again we went by the facts, and
Speaker 3: the facts show that also.
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask you this, do you think that
Speaker 1: the economic data was wrong? For example, you know, talking
Speaker 1: about consumer confidence? We look at how they rig you know,
Speaker 1: the inflation calculations, the labor unemployment figures, and all the
Speaker 1: rest of the stuff.
Speaker 4: Do you think they rigged consumer confidence and other things like.
Speaker 1: That, because you know, they won't put stuff out like
Speaker 1: that as a push poll to try to tell everybody, oh,
Speaker 1: you're happy with the economy or you're not happy with
Speaker 1: the economy, you know, to try to create they can
Speaker 1: use poles to create perception rather than just measure.
Speaker 3: No, because this is like from the University of Michigan,
Speaker 3: these things, so I don't know. But again, we just
Speaker 3: go by what's out there, and you know, we don't
Speaker 3: know if it's bregg again. If you want to know
Speaker 3: if it's rigged again. These are the numbers when we
Speaker 3: wrote the article. And another reason Trump won was despite
Speaker 3: his getting seventy three point six million votes this year,
Speaker 3: down from seventy four point two million when he ran
Speaker 3: against Joe Biden. Democrat Democratic support would quote more of
Speaker 3: the same and keep smiling while unable to answer questions.
Speaker 3: Harris got only sixty nine point three percent of the votes,
Speaker 3: twelve million less than the eighty one point three million
Speaker 3: votes Biden got when he ran against Trump in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: And then people say, well, they rigged the election. I
Speaker 2: get it.
Speaker 3: We're only going by the data. We got twelve million
Speaker 3: less votes. So what happened was people didn't care about
Speaker 3: any of them.
Speaker 2: A lot of people. Yeah, I remember people. I don't
Speaker 2: like it.
Speaker 3: And she made such a clown of herself when she again,
Speaker 3: again we go by what happened. She did good during
Speaker 3: the Democratic convention, she put on a good show. He
Speaker 3: beat Trump in the debates according to the polls, and
Speaker 3: Trump said I'm not going to debate her anymore.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, oh yeah. Everybody could see that, just
Speaker 1: like they could see how Biden couldn't handle himself at
Speaker 1: all in the first debate. They saw the same thing
Speaker 1: with Trump in the second one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so we thought she was going to do better.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and then she went on like the view and
Speaker 3: they asked her, you know, how is your campaign going
Speaker 3: to be your election going to be different white House
Speaker 3: than the Biden White House.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, I'm born from the middle class family.
Speaker 3: And for four minutes, she goes on a whole different direction,
Speaker 3: doesn't answer the questions. She made a fool of herself
Speaker 3: every time she went out there, that's right.
Speaker 1: And she even said, well, I'm not really going to
Speaker 1: change anything from all of this stuff, as you point out,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm just gonna laugh. I'm gonna say everything's
Speaker 1: going to be the same. I think it was also that,
Speaker 1: you know, everybody, even though it was a very brief
Speaker 1: period of time, it was enough time for people to
Speaker 1: see that there was absolutely nothing there. And she was
Speaker 1: absolutely afraid to talk to anybody. I mean, just take
Speaker 1: a look at the Joe Rogan thing, right, And so
Speaker 1: she's afraid to go on with Joe Rogan. She was
Speaker 1: afraid at the very beginning of it. Look how long
Speaker 1: she went without having any interviews, and then when she
Speaker 1: finally had one interview, she's got to bring in her
Speaker 1: security blanket, her vice president with her next to her,
Speaker 1: because she can't handle a one on one interview, even
Speaker 1: with a friendly interview, even though she knows that they're
Speaker 1: going to edit this stuff. So I think a lot
Speaker 1: of that was there, But I'm kind of thinking, you know,
Speaker 1: in terms of the abortion thing, I covered the fact
Speaker 1: that there was what maybe like ten different states that
Speaker 1: put the right to abortion in their constitution, and these
Speaker 1: were states that, you know, some of them were some
Speaker 1: of the battleground states and things like that. I think
Speaker 1: that really undercut her. I really think I'd undercut her
Speaker 1: issue because they said, look, we can handle this at
Speaker 1: the state level if they want the if they want abortion,
Speaker 1: which I know is import but if they want abortion,
Speaker 1: they can handle it at the state level. They don't
Speaker 1: need her, And she made her entire campaign around that,
Speaker 1: and people said, well, we can stop it. And that's
Speaker 1: you know, that's what I keep telling everybody all the
Speaker 1: time about all these individual issues. I said, each individual
Speaker 1: issue that is a threat to you. You're better off
Speaker 1: handling it at state level or at the local level,
Speaker 1: because you're not going to get it in Washington. These
Speaker 1: people are just a grab bag of weird issues and
Speaker 1: you can never trust them to do anything about it.
Speaker 1: So people really didn't that she lost that issue, and
Speaker 1: she was just an empty suit or pantsuit, I guess.
Speaker 3: And then Trump, you know, he bragged about him killing
Speaker 3: Roe versus Wade, but then he came out and said
Speaker 3: it should be about stage rights.
Speaker 2: It was exactly what you're saying.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 2: And again it wasn't a major issue.
Speaker 3: It was only let me see, it was like thirteen
Speaker 3: or fourteen percent of the people. Thirteen percent. Yeah, the
Speaker 3: people didn't care about it that much. Yeah, So anyway,
Speaker 3: that that's what And then then we also said when
Speaker 3: we made the forecast that Trump would win if there
Speaker 3: was an economic crisis, like a stock market crash. Well
Speaker 3: it wasn't State, it wasn't Wall Street, it was Main
Speaker 3: Street that went down, and that's why he won. And
Speaker 3: now again, now you look what's going on. You know,
Speaker 3: there's some things I like what he's doing, and other
Speaker 3: things I can't stand what he's doing.
Speaker 2: Is some of the people he's brought in. You know, before.
Speaker 3: He went on the air, you talked to ask me
Speaker 3: about gold. Gold took a big hit. Goal was at
Speaker 3: what twenty eight hundred bucks an ounce before he came in.
Speaker 1: And now what is it around mid I think or something.
Speaker 2: So here's the deal.
Speaker 1: You're ready and crypto coin has exploded and with these expectations.
Speaker 1: So yeah, what's your take on all that?
Speaker 2: Well, here we go. Let me give you the numbers here.
Speaker 3: When Trump won in twenty sixteen, right, where is it here?
Speaker 3: Goal fell twelve percent in the first year, silver fell
Speaker 3: thirteen percent in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2: When he got elected.
Speaker 3: The bitcoin thing again, all of a sudden, he became
Speaker 3: pro bitcoin. He got lot one hundred and fifty two
Speaker 3: hundred million dollars from the bitcoin people.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, that don't make him pro anything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like he's a pro Israel. What you got?
Speaker 2: How many hundred millions in the yatless?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: And so bitcoin, if there was no bitcoin, goal, prices
Speaker 3: would be another thousand dollars higher because you got so
Speaker 3: much money going into this and I don't see it.
Speaker 3: You know, we've been bull It's not what we like.
Speaker 3: What we want what we wish for. We've been bullish
Speaker 3: on It's in the Trends Journal. We've been bullsh on
Speaker 3: bitcoin for how many years. We called the bottom, we
Speaker 3: called it when we're going down. We said this is
Speaker 3: If it goes below this, it's going to go down.
Speaker 3: If it doesn't go it's going to go here. I mean,
Speaker 3: we've been right on target with this.
Speaker 2: This is my.
Speaker 3: This is big, this is real, and I don't see
Speaker 3: it going away. I think it's going to keep going
Speaker 3: up as long as Trump keeps propping it up.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: The other thing too, look at the people who's brought
Speaker 3: in like Musk. It shows you one thing. Everybody, get
Speaker 3: this in your head. If you're not a mill multi
Speaker 3: multi billionaire, you got nothing to say. So shut your
Speaker 3: mouth and you listen to the billionaires. You are just
Speaker 3: a little plantation worker of slave land here.
Speaker 2: You have no voice. You're right, nobody.
Speaker 5: I'm a Musk, I'm a bezos Gates the sorrows. You're
Speaker 5: just crap America who brings feedom and democracy to all
Speaker 5: over the world as they slaughter people and support genocide.
Speaker 5: This is no democracy, that's right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's even bragging, you know, joking about the fact
Speaker 1: that he brought that sink in when he bought Twitter.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm gonna, you know, throw everything out, including
Speaker 1: the kitchen sink type of thing. And so he photoshopped
Speaker 1: that picture of himself with a kitchen sink there in
Speaker 1: the Oval office, kind of bragging about how he had
Speaker 1: bought it too. I mean, a pretty clear reference. Hey,
Speaker 1: you know, I bought Twitter, now bought the White House,
Speaker 1: and that's exactly what he got.
Speaker 4: Now when I.
Speaker 1: Look at this, the other aspect of this that I
Speaker 1: think is kind of interesting, and I talked about this
Speaker 1: at the beginning of the week. A lot of the
Speaker 1: people around him, like lut Nick and other people, they've
Speaker 1: all always hung around ESG and of course must became
Speaker 1: the richest man in the world by being a you know,
Speaker 1: by exploiting all the green garbage and everything. And Musk
Speaker 1: has been a big proponent of carbon taxes, so has
Speaker 1: Lutenant and a lot of these other people. They've got
Speaker 1: a scheme they're running through some municipal organizations in Latin America,
Speaker 1: tied to a surveillance tied to the bit the blockchain.
Speaker 1: And so the question is are they going to try
Speaker 1: to run something through that's going to be kind of
Speaker 1: a private version of CBDC. You know, they want to
Speaker 1: get back to the carbon taxes. They want to do
Speaker 1: carbon capture. That was the one big thing of Leezellen,
Speaker 1: the guy that he put at EPA was all about
Speaker 1: carbon capture. When he was a Republican in Congress, he
Speaker 1: was pushing this carbon capture scam. And we've seen Trump
Speaker 1: doing that with Bergham and with Christinoman North and South Dakota,
Speaker 1: the CEO of this big carbon carbon dioxide pipeline. So
Speaker 1: this kind of stuff kind of in the background, running
Speaker 1: these kind of green scams and maybe folding all this
Speaker 1: stuff into a blockchain version of tracking what you're doing
Speaker 1: and putting.
Speaker 4: That out there.
Speaker 1: I look at this and I kind of think it's
Speaker 1: a combination of that. What is Musk want to get
Speaker 1: out of this? Of course, he wants more money, he
Speaker 1: wants to I think he might wind up being the
Speaker 1: first trillionaire. But it looks to me and he's talked
Speaker 1: about this. I've played this several times this week that
Speaker 1: he's talked about how he wants X to be this
Speaker 1: big processor of global payments. He said maybe half of
Speaker 1: the world's global payments happening on x.
Speaker 5: Is.
Speaker 1: How do you see his interest in all of this
Speaker 1: stuff other than just the standard green stuff. I think
Speaker 1: he's looking for something bigger this time around.
Speaker 3: Like you said, what you said is I agree with
Speaker 3: everything you says guys in control? Yeah, oh yeah, the money.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you money. How much is a cost to
Speaker 3: run these two elections? How many billions? Oh yeah yeah,
Speaker 3: how many billions?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 1: She took in a billion right away. There was even
Speaker 1: that joke on Saturday Night Line, they said, you took
Speaker 1: in a billion dollars? How come you're not winning? And
Speaker 1: she says, yes, I screamed that into my pillow every morning.
Speaker 1: You know, why am I not winning? With a billion dollars?
Speaker 1: Here she was doing stuff. She's paying celebrities big bucks,
Speaker 1: you know, to go and she put her picture and
Speaker 1: campaign stuff on that big Vegas ball. But they've got
Speaker 1: the sphere that was costing her half million dollars a day.
Speaker 1: I mean, it was just this vanity project for her.
Speaker 4: It was crazy.
Speaker 3: And again what you talked about, I hate that word. Celebrities,
Speaker 3: by the way, Yeah, what a stupid world.
Speaker 2: Celebrity. Oh, Sylvester Saloon set a clown set.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we celebrate them. They're people we celebrate.
Speaker 3: Yeah, celebrities anyway, Oprah, yeah, Beyonce, Taylor Swift, nothing, that's right,
Speaker 3: she got nothing from it, that's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I was on Oprah twice back in the day, and
Speaker 3: she was great. By the way, her show is better
Speaker 3: than I uld be on everybody. You remember when I
Speaker 3: was going to see it CNN like four times a month,
Speaker 3: All Today's Show, Good Morning America, all of them. They
Speaker 3: just said, trucks up with the satellites. Anyway, no one
Speaker 3: put on a better show than she did, her staff,
Speaker 3: her setup. It was way beyond the mainstream media back
Speaker 3: I'm going back.
Speaker 2: To the nineties and early two thousands.
Speaker 3: But anyway, the celebrities didn't get her anywhere. And that's
Speaker 3: very important to look at. And the other thing is
Speaker 3: look at the people that he's picking, you know.
Speaker 2: By the way, I.
Speaker 3: As you well know, I supported RFK Junior when I
Speaker 3: had one of my Peace rallies up here. His campaign manager,
Speaker 3: Dennis Kucinich was one of my speakers. I had given
Speaker 3: Kennedy the most amount of money an individual could give
Speaker 3: to a campaign, and he was going high in the
Speaker 3: beginning it was like up fifteen percent, which is unbelievable
Speaker 3: for a third party candidate.
Speaker 2: Back in January.
Speaker 3: Anyway, I got my money back when he became so
Speaker 3: pro Israel. And here's some of the things that he said.
Speaker 3: This is from Hahada's, the Israeli newspaper. Over the past
Speaker 3: year and a half, Kennedy has attempted to defend himself
Speaker 3: against alleged anti Semitism by cozying up to right wing
Speaker 3: pro Israel allies like Rabbi Shmuley, BOTECH and Zionist Organizations
Speaker 3: of American America CEO Mort Klein. He has also insisted
Speaker 3: that he has been more pro israel ill than Jewish Democrats.
Speaker 2: He said that.
Speaker 3: Palestinians quote, are the most pampered people in the world.
Speaker 3: And he keeps going on one article after pounded instead
Speaker 3: of consultant won't. Yeah, so I that's when I cut
Speaker 3: my I got my money back and and I don't
Speaker 3: support him, but I do support his stance against the
Speaker 3: drug dealers that people call big farmer.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, something good may come out of that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that that could be interesting. Yeah, it's I talked
Speaker 1: about that today. You know, he's a real mix bag
Speaker 1: everybody is, but especially the political parties who start jumping
Speaker 1: behind the political party.
Speaker 4: I just I can't do that anymore.
Speaker 2: It's just.
Speaker 1: But he is an interesting contradiction. He's all about children's health,
Speaker 1: but he supports abortion with that any restrictions. But he
Speaker 1: might even if he was just to get rid of
Speaker 1: the nineteen eighty six immunity, vaccine immunity, that would be
Speaker 1: a huge thing if he were to stop TV advertising
Speaker 1: like the tobacco industry, because it's the president Guard was saying,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's constitutional, and yet you know, whether
Speaker 1: it's constitutional or not, they've already set this thing up
Speaker 1: as a precedent, so he could use that precedent to
Speaker 1: stop the vaccine ads. And of course that's their superpower
Speaker 1: by buying all of these ads, they own the media,
Speaker 1: and that's how they can lie to everybody and make
Speaker 1: sure that they're never investigated, that there's never any journalism
Speaker 1: that's being done against them. So if they were to
Speaker 1: lose that, that would be a big blow to them,
Speaker 1: just those two things, and he might do.
Speaker 3: That on the ads. You know who made that they
Speaker 3: were prohibited.
Speaker 4: Was Clinton, wasn't it?
Speaker 2: Yep?
Speaker 3: Clinton slime Ball Clinton. Yeah, nineteen ninety seven, because I
Speaker 3: was hired by Warren O. Lambert, which was a big
Speaker 3: company back then. I think fires abought them out of
Speaker 3: some one of those and they hired me precise to
Speaker 3: do a lot of trends analysis of corporations, and I
Speaker 3: remember when it had happened.
Speaker 2: So and then going back to.
Speaker 3: The number is I think I'm not positive, but I
Speaker 3: think the number is. CNN forty seven percent of its
Speaker 3: income comes from drug dealer advertising.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, oh, their own Fox, I'm sure is the
Speaker 1: same thing. MSNBC, I'm sure is the same thing.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: And and all the you know, the broadcast media, ABC, CBS, NBC.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's all that would be a gigantic thing.
Speaker 1: If you could stop their ownership of the media, that
Speaker 1: would be a big thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean to me, you know again
Speaker 3: the motto of the trends journalist, think for yourself. You know,
Speaker 3: we put the facts down, we say, with the trends
Speaker 3: are heading, we give you our analysis and our forecast, but.
Speaker 2: You know, you do what you want to do.
Speaker 3: This is we're you know, we're finding and as I
Speaker 3: see it, inject all this stuff into a new born
Speaker 3: baby to me is insanity.
Speaker 2: It is it is, it's insanity.
Speaker 3: Yeah, a little infigure, all these things going into the body. Again,
Speaker 3: when we were young guys, there was nobody. Again, I'm
Speaker 3: born in nineteen forty six, the height of the baby.
Speaker 3: I got like fifty kids in my class.
Speaker 2: Nobody had autism.
Speaker 1: Well, look at how has exploded, you know, it's eighty six.
Speaker 1: At fact, she gets that in by eighty nine they
Speaker 1: do rain Man. We're talking about that the other day.
Speaker 1: Eighty nine they do rain Man, and autism is so
Speaker 1: rare at that point in time that they had to
Speaker 1: explain to people what autism was in the movie. But
Speaker 1: now it's like, you know, three kids out of one hundred,
Speaker 1: you know, or one out of every thirty three kids
Speaker 1: has got autism.
Speaker 4: And I just I cover ill. Can't get past.
Speaker 1: This one case that I covered about a month ago,
Speaker 1: and it was a custody battle. The parents had not
Speaker 1: in a divorce, parents had not vaccinated the kids. The
Speaker 1: judge gets it, says that's child abuse. You don't vaccinate
Speaker 1: the kids. I'll give the custody to whichever parent does this,
Speaker 1: and the mom says, I'll do it. It took the
Speaker 1: kids out three of them, and the two youngest. They
Speaker 1: gave them eighteen vaccines all at once, and they both
Speaker 1: went into intensive care immediately, and the one that was
Speaker 1: the youngest came out with autism that is so severe
Speaker 1: he can't engage. He's just catatonic, and his dad's got
Speaker 1: to change his diaper and everything. It's just unbelievable, and
Speaker 1: there's absolutely no question that that's what caused it, and
Speaker 1: yet the main the media ignores it because they're owned
Speaker 1: by the pharmaceutical company.
Speaker 3: Got it.
Speaker 4: It's just amazing.
Speaker 2: I again, I don't call them pharmaceutical companies. They drug dealers.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they used the word big farm and they're not pharmaceutical.
Speaker 3: They're drug dealers. And again, look at the billions of
Speaker 3: dollars they give to the doctors.
Speaker 1: Well, you know the other part of it too, is
Speaker 1: we talked about those could be good things. I played
Speaker 1: a clip from Marv K Junior this week earlier. First
Speaker 1: of all, I was really surprised. I really did not
Speaker 1: think that he was going to be given HHS. I
Speaker 1: know that he said that Trump had promised it to him,
Speaker 1: but he had his co chair of the transition team,
Speaker 1: and I played it again today, Lutnick say, no, he's
Speaker 1: not going to get that. No, he's not going to
Speaker 1: get that. So I thought they were just going to
Speaker 1: show him the door and use him like Trump used
Speaker 1: him back in twenty seventeen. But he talked about how
Speaker 1: Smithfield and took over the pork industry and then how
Speaker 1: they sold themselves off to China and everything. So he's
Speaker 1: spot on in that, and that may there could be
Speaker 1: some very important stuff there in terms of the FDA
Speaker 1: on the food side that he could also do as well.
Speaker 1: So both of those things are very positive. That's the
Speaker 1: most positive thing I've seen now the Trump administration right
Speaker 1: now is to put him in at HHS. I think
Speaker 1: he's going to expose stuff. You may legitimize these these
Speaker 1: organizations that need to be abolished, but at least we
Speaker 1: can get some of this stuff exposed and maybe some
Speaker 1: real change there.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 2: You know, that's again if Congress approves.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, you think there's going to be a
Speaker 1: problem with that.
Speaker 4: I think it's good.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying the wild card there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think it's going to be a real problem
Speaker 1: with some of these other picks like Matt Gates and
Speaker 1: Pete hegg Seth that at defense. I don't think they're
Speaker 1: going to make it through the.
Speaker 2: Clousy pick Marco Rubio.
Speaker 4: Rubyo.
Speaker 1: Isn't that amazing state? What qualifies them from As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, christinome I was saying earlier, I said,
Speaker 1: she's a she's a a white version, a GOP version
Speaker 1: of La La Harris. She's just an empty suit. She
Speaker 1: didn't know anything. Why she was she dhs I joked
Speaker 1: earlier this week, I said, well, she bragged about shooting
Speaker 1: her dog, so maybe that qualifies her for being the
Speaker 1: top cop, since they are known for shooting dogs when
Speaker 1: they show up.
Speaker 4: But other than that, I.
Speaker 2: Don't Rubio what a little jerk of nothing?
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, oh yeah.
Speaker 3: And again now to me, so remember Trump said he's
Speaker 3: going to end the war in Ukraine in twenty four
Speaker 3: hours when he gets elected, So let's see what happens there.
Speaker 3: And to me, the big issue, for equally big issue
Speaker 3: is the Israel war and Trump's people that he's picked
Speaker 3: or roll progenocide.
Speaker 4: Yeah, hugely, hugely progenocide. Yeah.
Speaker 3: This is from Hahadat's the Israeli newspaper which we subscribe to.
Speaker 3: So it's trend fourcasts. We go all over so we
Speaker 3: subscribe to this. We pay to go there. We don't
Speaker 3: have to pay, but we go to Times of Israel,
Speaker 3: Jerusalem Post, but we also go to Tron Times, I RNs,
Speaker 3: ir Na is Na Press TV one. He with the
Speaker 3: Iranians have to say, Arab News Aljazer, one of the Arabs.
Speaker 2: Have to say.
Speaker 3: This is from Hah, that's yesterday. Ready for his headline. Yeah,
Speaker 3: Trump's pro Israel appointees are the worst of our enemies.
Speaker 4: Really, And why do they say that.
Speaker 3: Because they tell the people that he's picking and how
Speaker 3: terrible they do. And you look at the people that
Speaker 3: he's picked and the things that they say. And one
Speaker 3: of them, let me find this article here. If I
Speaker 3: have it, you know what I did with it?
Speaker 2: The what's his name Huckleberry there?
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, Mike, yeah, Mike Cuckleberry. Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: What what did he say about? Uh?
Speaker 1: He said it's Judea and Samaria. There's no such thing
Speaker 1: as a West Bank or settlements and that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And and and that guy, the other guy he picked,
Speaker 3: I forgot his name.
Speaker 4: He Seth Hegseeth, the Pete Hegseth from fron.
Speaker 3: That's with an L, I think with something anyway. Going
Speaker 3: back to Huckleberry that there was never such thing as
Speaker 3: a Palestine, he said that the uh, there's no such
Speaker 3: thing as settlements. These are developed properties and and and
Speaker 3: they all say that God gave him this land. Right, Okay,
Speaker 3: how about whis God?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 3: Could God come out and say this? How about God
Speaker 3: coming out and saying I gave you this land?
Speaker 1: For Orthodox Day, they say, well, yeah, God gave us
Speaker 1: a lab But God's going to give us a land.
Speaker 1: He's going to come out. He's gonna do what you said.
Speaker 1: He's going to come out and give it to us.
Speaker 1: That's what the Orthodoxy.
Speaker 2: So bring out your God.
Speaker 3: If there's the God that you believe in, were you hiding,
Speaker 3: come on out God? Tell them that if God comes
Speaker 3: out and says this land belongs to the Jewish people, Okay, fine,
Speaker 3: what God, you're talking about something you made up?
Speaker 2: What if there's the God that you're saying, come on out.
Speaker 2: I look at it.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I know a lot of Christian Zionists
Speaker 1: who will look at this and to them, it's all
Speaker 1: tied up and they're into the world. Interpretations of Revelation
Speaker 1: and everything, and so they're very much into this. They're
Speaker 1: not so much into, you know, uh, fighting the corruption
Speaker 1: that we all face and the struggles that we all face.
Speaker 1: That it's very easy to get focused on Trump, to
Speaker 1: get focused on Israel, so that you don't really do
Speaker 1: the hard personal stuff right and and we've seen that
Speaker 1: over and over again when Jesus would confront somebody and say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, you're living with a man that you're not
Speaker 1: even married to right now, and you had a bunch
Speaker 1: of husbands. Well, what do you think about should we
Speaker 1: have to we worship God in Jerusalem or in Samaria?
Speaker 1: You immediately change it over to theology, because that's where
Speaker 1: you're you're comfortable. And you know, when you look at
Speaker 1: the Jewish people like Ben Shapiro, he goes on with
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, and you know, Rogan says, do you believe
Speaker 1: that God part of the Red Sea?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: I don't believe any of that stuff, but he believes
Speaker 1: that God gave him the land. And so people will
Speaker 1: focus on what they pick and choose what they want
Speaker 1: and h in terms of their theology, or they get
Speaker 1: focused on, you know, the land. And that's what I
Speaker 1: see happening. Even with the Christians who are doing this.
Speaker 1: They get focused on a political they get focused on
Speaker 1: the land, they get focused on their interpretation, and then
Speaker 1: they project it onto this political organization run by net
Speaker 1: and Yahoo that we call Israel. That's not the Israel
Speaker 1: that I see and so, and it's not for people
Speaker 1: who say, well, I don't believe the Bible except the
Speaker 1: part where it says I get the land. I'm not
Speaker 1: impressed with that kind of claim. And so that's but
Speaker 1: I see that in Hegseeth as well as Huckabee. You know,
Speaker 1: Israel first and always. You know, Hegseth said, well, Israel,
Speaker 1: what kind of America? What can Israel learn from America? No, no, no,
Speaker 1: The answer is the question is what can America learn
Speaker 1: from Israel? You know, always putting this political national entity
Speaker 1: above us and ignoring all the spiritual truths that are there.
Speaker 3: I think, yeah, again, he picked what's the name Tulca Gabbard.
Speaker 2: You know, when I did.
Speaker 3: A twenty twenty one two I forget, they had this
Speaker 3: rage against the War Machine rally in DC and I
Speaker 3: was one of the speakers because Senator was there, Jimmy
Speaker 3: Dre Tulca Gabbard a whole bunch of us.
Speaker 2: She was so unfriendly, I'm telling you, right.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, well hanging out backstage, you know, everybody friendly
Speaker 3: with each other. Anyway, she has got an attitude. This
Speaker 3: is from anti war. Trump picks Tulsi Gabbard for Director
Speaker 3: of National Intelligence. Gabbard has repeatedly claimed that you're ready,
Speaker 3: islam Ism is the greatest threat facing the United States.
Speaker 3: She said hamas October seventh attack in southern Israel was
Speaker 3: quote a stark reminder of the ongoing short and long
Speaker 3: term threats of Islamist terrorism that continues to spread.
Speaker 2: Around the world today.
Speaker 3: Their goal is to establish a global Islamist caliphate where
Speaker 3: all must live under their Sharia law. And we must
Speaker 3: quote stand with Israel. And she called actions in Gaza,
Speaker 3: she called the genocide. The people that call the genocide
Speaker 3: the people in Congress. There are apologists and supporters of
Speaker 3: is lomest homis Hamas terrorists.
Speaker 1: Well that's her ticket into the cabinet, right, yep, got
Speaker 1: her ticket.
Speaker 2: Place one after another.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, she she's a real she's a real
Speaker 1: chameleon opportunist as well. I mean, it's just she's smarter
Speaker 1: than La La but she can flip flop back and forth.
Speaker 1: She used to be pro life, and then she became
Speaker 1: pro abortion so she could get elected as a Democrat.
Speaker 1: She used to be pro peace, then she became pro war,
Speaker 1: so she get elected as a or so she could
Speaker 1: join the Republicans. She's all over the place, whatever whatever
Speaker 1: gets her there. She was a World Economic Forum young leader,
Speaker 1: and yet you know, oh, I didn't know they did that.
Speaker 1: And yet she accepted that and liked it. She's part
Speaker 1: of the Council on Foreign Relations. And I think the
Speaker 1: interesting thing is that she is when you look at it,
Speaker 1: she's in the army. I think it's reserved, maybe National Guard,
Speaker 1: but I'm not sure if it's reserved National Guard.
Speaker 4: Never US.
Speaker 1: She is a syop operator, lieutenant colonel who does psyops. Yep,
Speaker 1: So somebody you can trust.
Speaker 4: For sure.
Speaker 3: These are a couple of headlines in the last two days.
Speaker 3: Israel renews brutal cycle of war in North Gaza. You
Speaker 3: look at these pictures, this little kid in the bottom
Speaker 3: over here. This is the New York Times. The genocide
Speaker 3: that's being committed in Gaza in front of everybody's eyes,
Speaker 3: just keeps going on and on and on and there
Speaker 3: is nothing, nothing talked about it, say we have to
Speaker 3: stop it. Anti war. Israeli military planning to stay in
Speaker 3: Gaza through twenty twenty five, push revive for West Bank annexation.
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 3: Since Trump's win, Israeli ministers see an opportun unity to
Speaker 3: control the territory.
Speaker 4: Yeah, oh yeah, it's a crop.
Speaker 3: There's more here Israel forces. This is yesterday, forty seven
Speaker 3: Palestinians in Gaza over the last twenty four hours. You imagine,
Speaker 3: imagine if the people in Gaza were Jewish and the
Speaker 3: Palestinians were doing this to the Jewish people in Gaza.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, how terrible. This is another Holocaust. No, no,
Speaker 3: Palestinian lives don't matter, they don't count. Look what they're
Speaker 3: doing to Lebanon. They have destroyed, they have destroyed thirty
Speaker 3: percent of southern Lebanon bombed to ruins.
Speaker 2: What did Lebanon?
Speaker 3: I got Hesbala there the terrorists. Oh wait a minute,
Speaker 3: terrorists you mean the Lebanese people that threw Israel out
Speaker 3: of Lebanon when Lebanon, when they attacked Lebanon in nineteen
Speaker 3: eighty two, and he couldn't get him out until like
Speaker 3: two thousand and two.
Speaker 2: Oh they're terrorists. Oh. Oh, by the way, I forgot.
Speaker 3: Israel killed about over a dozen people in Damascus two
Speaker 3: days ago.
Speaker 1: Yeah, into Syria, yeah yeah, Lebanon, Syria, everywhere.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yes, they have the right to defend themselves. Nobody else does.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 1: Well, you know I saw Pete Hegseath and all these
Speaker 1: all these people he was. I had a couple of
Speaker 1: clips of his I played him though a day apart.
Speaker 1: But in one of them he's talking about Putin and
Speaker 1: he says, you know, he's just he's firing missiles of
Speaker 1: these civilians. It's unending, and you know, they're using civilians
Speaker 1: as shields and so forth, and it's just but it's
Speaker 1: reprehensible that he's firing it in and he's you know,
Speaker 1: killing everybody. It's in these all these civilians, men as well,
Speaker 1: but especially women and children.
Speaker 4: And then.
Speaker 1: He condemns that when it's Putin, but he defends it
Speaker 1: when it's Israel doing it into gossip, you know, And
Speaker 1: that's what we see all the time. And they talk
Speaker 1: about the fact, Okay, well it was Hamas that attacked
Speaker 1: us on October the seventh, and it's like, okay, but
Speaker 1: part of a just war is not just that you
Speaker 1: don't do preemptive strikes, but it's also that you don't
Speaker 1: continue the war, that you try to avoid civilian casualties,
Speaker 1: that your goal is to try to have peace. Clearly,
Speaker 1: that's not even that's not any interest at all. And
Speaker 1: now they have compounded that by promptively attacking into Syria
Speaker 1: as well as into Lebanon. It's an unjustified war. There's
Speaker 1: no way that it could be justified.
Speaker 4: Not no way.
Speaker 3: Not well, going back to like you said, to support
Speaker 3: in the Ukraine War, but keep the genocide going. Going
Speaker 3: back to Tulsa Gabbard, Gabbard has been an opponent of
Speaker 3: the US involvement in Ukraine War. Quote, this war and
Speaker 3: suffering could have easily been avoided if the Biden administration
Speaker 3: NATO had simply acknowledged Russia's legitimate security concerns. Okay, wait
Speaker 3: a minute, this Warren's suffering. Oh, that Warren's suffering, that's terrible.
Speaker 3: But the Warren suffering of the Palestinian people. Oh no, no,
Speaker 3: she supports that. The apocrisy, the apocrisy, and nobody calls
Speaker 3: them out.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well, you know, when I look at the
Speaker 1: statements that are being made about war by Waltz, by Ratcliff,
Speaker 1: by heg Seth and all this. They all sound like
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham. It's amazing. I mean, you know, you look
Speaker 1: at the Trump cabinet and it's a bunch of Lindsay
Speaker 1: Graham clones. This guy Waltz had said about Afghanistan in
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, he said, your grandkids are going to be
Speaker 1: fighting there, and that's good. We got to send your
Speaker 1: grandkids to this war. It's going to be there for generations.
Speaker 1: Didn't turn out that way, though, did it. You know,
Speaker 1: they lost that war yet again.
Speaker 3: It's oh, and let's go back to the bs, Biden
Speaker 3: and BS little boy blinking that another arrogant little clown boy.
Speaker 3: My daddy was ambassador to Hungry, my uncle was ambassador
Speaker 3: to Belgium.
Speaker 2: I'm I'm blinking. I went to Dalton, I went to Harvard.
Speaker 3: That arrogant little clown lying all the time about the
Speaker 3: ceasefire efforts, that Netanya who kept killing and blaming it
Speaker 3: on Hamas. Oh that one, because Hamas had the nerve
Speaker 3: to say, we want a permanent ceasefire.
Speaker 4: M hm.
Speaker 3: So remember here, the United States will not withhold military
Speaker 3: aid from Israel, the Department said Tuesday, after top Biden
Speaker 3: administration officials warned a month ago that they would consider
Speaker 3: doing if the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza did
Speaker 3: not improve. Remember that, Yeah, way to Austin and Blincoln
Speaker 3: saying that if you don't allow the aid to improve,
Speaker 3: we're cutting off the military. The aid didn't improve, it's terrible. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and they're keeping it going. They're keeping stealing out of
Speaker 3: money to keep giving Israel more weapons of death to
Speaker 3: slaughter innocent people.
Speaker 4: Oh.
Speaker 1: You look at how they went to such absurd extremes
Speaker 1: to create that long peer.
Speaker 2: And none of that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, he had.
Speaker 1: One guy get killed, but it was such an absurd
Speaker 1: thing to do this in order to count how to
Speaker 1: their demands. It's like just open up the road and
Speaker 1: let people come in. No, no, no, we're going to build
Speaker 1: this multimillion dollar uh you know, Rube Goldberg peer thing.
Speaker 4: That's not going to work.
Speaker 1: And it was absurd, but it just showed just how
Speaker 1: weak and subservient the US government is to Israel's demands.
Speaker 1: It truly is amazing.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, you know, it's it's we wrote about as
Speaker 3: a trans journal as soon as they told a Pierce story. Again,
Speaker 3: we put down all the facts. What a fraud it was,
Speaker 3: of course, like almost half a billion dollars.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and who did it?
Speaker 4: Or Rich?
Speaker 2: The military industrial complex?
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, Yeah, it's all about that, isn't it. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, what, what do you think is going to happen?
Speaker 1: I got a question here from one person, said David,
Speaker 1: I had a friend at work, tell me Trump will
Speaker 1: fulfill his campaign promises this time. He bet me twenty
Speaker 1: bucks that Trump will release all unredacted Epstein nine to
Speaker 1: eleven and JFK files.
Speaker 4: Do you think I'll win? That's funny, that's funny.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: The other thing on the economy, again, we only look
Speaker 3: at facts. Yeah, let's go back to twenty eighteen December.
Speaker 3: Trump's president, the S and P five hundred to Dow
Speaker 3: down ten percent in one month correction, territory January comes.
Speaker 3: He forced Powell to lower interest rates to jack up
Speaker 3: the markets artificially. And what happened in September twenty nineteen, Oh,
Speaker 3: the repot crisis.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, all forgotten about it, that's right.
Speaker 3: Here's what we see on the tax cuts. Trump's tax
Speaker 3: cuts in twenty seventeen went to the According to the
Speaker 3: Tax Policy Center, the one percent got sixty four percent
Speaker 3: of the tax benefits.
Speaker 2: Trump sold the BS that.
Speaker 3: By giving the big corporations these tax cuts, they're going
Speaker 3: to use the money for capital improvements, meaning building jobs
Speaker 3: and building factories. Twenty eighteen comes it was the biggest
Speaker 3: year stock buybacks on a record, no capital improvements. So
Speaker 3: going back to now Gold, I again, I can't say
Speaker 3: he's going to do it, but buy his track record
Speaker 3: because again, let's go back to the COVID War when
Speaker 3: he launched it on March thirteenth, Black Friday, twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: he pushed the Fed to lower interest rates to zero
Speaker 3: and pumped in trillions of dollars.
Speaker 2: Of fake money back by nothing in printed on nothing.
Speaker 3: He's going to do everything he can to keep propping
Speaker 3: up this economy so the rich keep getting richer because
Speaker 3: he's a member of that class. That means lowering interest rates.
Speaker 3: The lower interest rates go, the deeper the dollar falls.
Speaker 3: The deeper the dollar falls, the higher goal prices go. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so that's what we have to see what's going to
Speaker 3: happen with interest rates.
Speaker 1: And he's already started pushing on Powell. You know that's
Speaker 1: all that's talking about. Well, maybe i'll push him out.
Speaker 1: Maybe if I can't get him out of the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 1: maybe i'll make sure that he's not the chair anymore.
Speaker 1: So he's already putting on that pressure campaign about that.
Speaker 1: And as you point out, we know what he did
Speaker 1: when he was there before. He pushed on him to
Speaker 1: do quantitative easing and interest rate rate cuts.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so the one thing that he would be great
Speaker 3: to do is to end the FED.
Speaker 4: Mm hmmmm. I don't think you'll do that.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying that would be a great thing.
Speaker 3: I don't think they do it either, But I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: He wants to seat at the table. He doesn't want
Speaker 1: to end it. He wants to be there so he
Speaker 1: can move some of.
Speaker 2: The lovers by ending it. He'll be in charge of it.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah, well, you know we have.
Speaker 1: There was a it was either mess or a reason
Speaker 1: that had a think saying, you know, what can the
Speaker 1: president do all this stuff about FED and dependence? They said,
Speaker 1: that's not a real thing. You go back and you
Speaker 1: look at FDR and presidents around that time they were
Speaker 1: telling the FED what to do. They even had the
Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary on the board and even had FDR say
Speaker 1: turn in your gold told the Federal Reserve, and the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve gave him his goal. So there's not any independence.
Speaker 4: There never was.
Speaker 1: It's just something they've they've created to say, leave us alone.
Speaker 1: You can't look at what we're doing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the banks do is helping us.
Speaker 4: Yeah yeah, yeah, that's right.
Speaker 2: So banks to band, it's running the country again. We
Speaker 2: missed it.
Speaker 3: You know, the working class in this country, it's the
Speaker 3: young people have voted for Trump.
Speaker 2: They can't get a job.
Speaker 3: I have a cousin her her grand grandson graduated one
Speaker 3: of the top.
Speaker 2: Schools in New York City.
Speaker 3: You couldn't get a job. He finally found one. He's
Speaker 3: working at Target for sixteen dollars an hour.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Again, when we were young men, there were grocery stores,
Speaker 3: hardware stores, stationary stores, drug stores, shoes stores. Now they're
Speaker 3: ald chains, all the all the Momon shop businesses are gone.
Speaker 2: My father's side, my four uncles had fish stores.
Speaker 3: What a flushing one in when in uh Rego Park,
Speaker 3: one of Jackson Heights went up in the Bronx and
Speaker 3: my uncle's had butcher shops there there was a middle class.
Speaker 3: They all had nice little homes, all gone, all gone.
Speaker 3: Now you're a butcher, you're working at Hanna Fitz as somebody.
Speaker 1: Well Trump said they were all non essential when you
Speaker 1: lock them down and killed him, you know, as a
Speaker 1: war on main Street under Trump. That's why, you know,
Speaker 1: I look at this and it's like, how in the
Speaker 1: world can people support this guy?
Speaker 2: Again? Look what they Look what they had.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's why they supported it. They believed his BSh
Speaker 3: I know, and he's a again.
Speaker 2: You know, we owned the trademark.
Speaker 3: We took it out when he ran in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 3: and we were the first magazine to call him a
Speaker 3: winner back then.
Speaker 2: By the way name.
Speaker 3: We call we took out the trademark presidential reality show.
Speaker 3: That's all it is. He puts on a show. Yeah,
Speaker 3: he's a pro at this.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 1: Well, it's it's going to be interesting to see what
Speaker 1: happens in any other areas that you see interesting things
Speaker 1: happen again, you know, when we look at there's so
Speaker 1: much optimism from the coin people. As you point out,
Speaker 1: I think, you know, we've seen gold go down, We've
Speaker 1: seen a lot of money move over into crypto I'm
Speaker 1: concerned ultimately about how that might be used by these
Speaker 1: big tech guys who've essentially taken over control with Trump.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, I was talking to Tony
Speaker 1: Ardbund yesterday wisewolf gold, and he was you know, we're
Speaker 1: talking about the fact none of the fundamentals have changed.
Speaker 1: You know, Russia is still accumulating gold and other things
Speaker 1: like that, and none of the fundamentals in terms of
Speaker 1: our you know, our massive debt and the spending and
Speaker 1: all the other things that have been driving all this stuff,
Speaker 1: none of that has changed.
Speaker 2: Here's all what changed.
Speaker 3: With Trump saying he's going to decrease the war effort
Speaker 3: in Ukraine, there's less fear of World War three escalating,
Speaker 3: and that was one of the things driving up gold prices.
Speaker 1: Now, what do you think, Okay, because I think it's
Speaker 1: a given that we're going to get involved in a
Speaker 1: war with Iran. So if we have peace in Ukraine
Speaker 1: and war with Iron, how does that affect the markets
Speaker 1: and gold price?
Speaker 3: All goal prices as skyrocket? But then again, you just
Speaker 3: heard that Musk just met with the with the Israeli assador,
Speaker 3: the Iranian ambassador, one of the top guys to talk
Speaker 3: to him, and I think Musk is going to play
Speaker 3: a big role in this whole government. And by the way,
Speaker 3: I do agree with the thing about cutting back on
Speaker 3: the bureaucrats, getting rid of these bureaucrats, to me, the
Speaker 3: lowest pieces of crapped on earth. Oh yeah, he can't
Speaker 3: get a job in the real world that suck into
Speaker 3: the political system and become the most arrogant.
Speaker 1: I just I just find it a bit hard to
Speaker 1: believe that the guy who has become the richest man
Speaker 1: in the world by exploiting government waste is really do anything.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe he will get rid of the Maybe
Speaker 1: he'll get rid of wasteful welfare programs for other people
Speaker 1: while he gets the government subsidies for programs.
Speaker 3: Maybe absolutely, Yeah, absolutely absolutely. But again I think that's
Speaker 3: the positive, to get rid of that stuff. But again
Speaker 3: going back is also the wild cards that nobody could predict.
Speaker 3: Will will Ukraine attack a nuclear power plant in Russia?
Speaker 3: Will there be a false flag event that gets involved
Speaker 3: in the war. Again, if we go to if Israel,
Speaker 3: Israel is nothing more than a bully beating up little kids,
Speaker 3: tiny little gods. What is the size of Manhattan? They
Speaker 3: don't have planes or tanks to fight back. Where they
Speaker 3: got rifles? Oh, they're bombing the hell out of Lebanon,
Speaker 3: five point seven million people, a country the size of Connecticut. Yeah, yeah, Oh,
Speaker 3: now you've got seven million Israelis right, there's nine million people,
Speaker 3: but twenty percent of a Marab against ninety one million
Speaker 3: Iranians who are very advanced scientifically, technologically, militarily. Yeah, Israel
Speaker 3: is nothing more than a bully, accurately tough. Is it
Speaker 3: beating up little kids? No way in the world are
Speaker 3: they going to be able to beat Iran?
Speaker 2: No way? No.
Speaker 3: Oh, the United States is going to get involved. The
Speaker 3: United States it hasn't won a war since World War Two,
Speaker 3: and you wouldn't have won that without the Russians. You
Speaker 3: couldn't beat the Vietnamese, couldn't beat the Rockies, you couldn't
Speaker 3: beat the Afghans.
Speaker 2: You're going to beat Iran.
Speaker 4: Yeah, let me ask you about this.
Speaker 1: I think that we're in the in the period of time,
Speaker 1: in this transition period of time, it looked like right
Speaker 1: after the election, you had this big back and forth
Speaker 1: with a drone strike that was, you know, mutual drone
Speaker 1: strikes between Ukraine and Russia. I think they were trying
Speaker 1: to a big effort to move the line of contact
Speaker 1: because they figured that, you know, when there's a piece
Speaker 1: going to be imposed, that it's going to freeze the
Speaker 1: line of contact. So do you think we're in a
Speaker 1: very potentially dangerous period of time here between before Trump
Speaker 1: gets in and can impose any kind of a piece thing.
Speaker 4: What do you think?
Speaker 2: Absolutely?
Speaker 3: Absolutely, because they know they're not going to get the
Speaker 3: DELL from the United States under Trump. He ain't going
Speaker 3: to give it to them, and they're going to do
Speaker 3: something to escalate this war. There's going to be a
Speaker 3: false flag and we'll get the people just like you know, again,
Speaker 3: I've got a hundred times I mentioned it.
Speaker 2: You google it up.
Speaker 3: Franklin Roosevelt seeses all Japanese assets July twenty sixth, nineteen
Speaker 3: forty one. And then the United States get the history
Speaker 3: today mainstream United States, UK, and Dutch.
Speaker 2: What did they do?
Speaker 3: They cut off three quarters of Japanese trade and eighty
Speaker 3: eight percent of their imported oil they only import one
Speaker 3: hundred percent. Can't understand why they bomb Pearl Hobi Is
Speaker 3: six months later?
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, right.
Speaker 3: They're going to do something like that. That's going to
Speaker 3: escalate this thing into a false flag event.
Speaker 4: Well, let me ask you.
Speaker 1: You know, when we look at gold and of course
Speaker 1: it's it's bullsh for gold. I guess if there's war,
Speaker 1: but you know, if there's peace, maybe this this drags
Speaker 1: on and we see gold kind of flatline or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know you'd predicted, and of course, you know things
Speaker 1: have changed with a surprise of Trump being there. You
Speaker 1: predicted that this year would be the year for gold.
Speaker 1: But what do you think happens in the long term?
Speaker 1: I mean, is this a buying opportunity because it's on sale,
Speaker 1: or you know, what is the situation because so many
Speaker 1: of the fundamentals there in terms of you know, inflation
Speaker 1: is not under control. Trump is going to start pulling
Speaker 1: all those levers again like you did the first time.
Speaker 1: And then of course we've got this massive debt, not
Speaker 1: just in our country but all over the world. So
Speaker 1: you know, what is the you know, where do you
Speaker 1: think things are headed in the longer term, let's say
Speaker 1: mid to long term with a bitcoin and gold and
Speaker 1: things like that.
Speaker 3: Go to your trends journal. Two weeks ago we said
Speaker 3: gold just had a spike up. We made the forecast.
Speaker 3: It was two forty one dollars when it hit twenty
Speaker 3: eight hundred, we said, nothing goes straight up.
Speaker 2: There has to be a correction here.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 2: Now we're in that correction territory.
Speaker 3: It happened after Trump got elected, so we got to
Speaker 3: watch to see what's going to happen.
Speaker 2: And that's so again I gave you the numbers of
Speaker 2: how much goal.
Speaker 3: Went down when Trump took office the last time in
Speaker 3: twenty sixteen. You got to watch what's going on. And
Speaker 3: so we're not ready to make a forecast yet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's going to be interesting. What do you think
Speaker 1: about the terroifts. We're almost out of time, but what
Speaker 1: do you think about the terrorists? We only get like
Speaker 1: thirty seconds.
Speaker 3: I want America to become a self sustaining economy.
Speaker 4: You think that's going to be inflationary.
Speaker 3: It'll be inflationary, but be inflationary temporarily because you're if
Speaker 3: you had more manufacturing, your pay goes up rather than
Speaker 3: working as a bartender or a waiter or working at walmarts.
Speaker 4: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 2: Temporarily bring it up, but long term, month for it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's always great talking to you, Gerald silenty Trends
Speaker 1: Journal Folks, you can save ten percent off with a
Speaker 1: code night and it is a bargain. Thank you so much, Cheryl,
Speaker 1: have a good weekend.