Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the fifth of February.
Speaker 2: You're our lord, twenty twenty six. Well, who built bitcoin?
Speaker 2: I don't mean the code, I mean the infrastructure, the
Speaker 2: financial infrastructure behind and around it. Well, Epstein's emails are
Speaker 2: shedding new light on the real people behind bitcoin. And
Speaker 2: we're also going to take a look at the great
Speaker 2: taking These things have been taking shape, planned, practiced for decades,
Speaker 2: just like the pandemic, just like by the way, the
Speaker 2: police state, the surveillance state that I've been talking about
Speaker 2: all of this week. They were going to take a
Speaker 2: look at what is behind really not just a surface evil.
Speaker 2: Do we see you with Epstein? But what's behind this
Speaker 2: and the things that have shocked the world. It is
Speaker 2: an ancient evil for those who have the eyes to see.
Speaker 3: If you knew who was really behind bitcoin, really behind bitcoin,
Speaker 3: you would run as fast as you could to sell it.
Speaker 3: I know, one hundred percent. If you knew who owned
Speaker 3: bitcoin or who started bitcoin, you and you had bitcoin,
Speaker 3: you couldn't sleep at night.
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 5: One hundred percent.
Speaker 3: And when the real founder of bitcoin comes out. It
Speaker 3: is my humble opinion, and there's nothing humble about me.
Speaker 3: Bitcoin will go to freaking zero.
Speaker 6: One day.
Speaker 3: And Michael second rou like that.
Speaker 2: Who is that guy? Well, that's an old clip. It's
Speaker 2: been for a while. It's taken on new life and
Speaker 2: new meaning. That guy is Dan Pinia. I think his
Speaker 2: way he pronounced his last name. He's got the little
Speaker 2: squidly marko of the end. Any better clue, Travis, But
Speaker 2: I think it's Penia. Could be Pinia painya Okay. Anyway,
Speaker 2: his background he's in it was formerly an LA detective,
Speaker 2: worked with the CIA, worked on Wall Street as an
Speaker 2: analyst who worked actually for bear Stearns. He has co
Speaker 2: founded or led many different companies oil, gas, real estate, entertainment,
Speaker 2: even and he is He has quantum leap seminars, wealth
Speaker 2: creation seminars and stuff. He's known for being brash and profane.
Speaker 6: As you heard.
Speaker 2: I had to bleep that out a couple of times.
Speaker 2: It's just that short clip, but he truly is a
Speaker 2: rags to riches individual. A lot of people call him
Speaker 2: a fake guru. I'm not talking about that. But when
Speaker 2: you look at that clip and you put it in
Speaker 2: the context of what was just released with these Epstein documents.
Speaker 2: It's pretty amaz Actually, a lot of people are talking
Speaker 2: about it. So I mentioned it yesterday. There was a
Speaker 2: very long post on Twitter by the individual who went
Speaker 2: through the relationships of the stuff, and I didn't get
Speaker 2: finished with the yesterday. I want to pick up with that,
Speaker 2: but just understand where this thing is coming from, and
Speaker 2: just to recap what I talked about yesterday.
Speaker 7: Real quickly, I want to interject I'm personally a little
Speaker 7: skeptical about this guy and what he's saying, not necessarily
Speaker 7: that you would run for the hills, but that he
Speaker 7: knows who it is, simply because he's implying, oh, there's
Speaker 7: a huge ethical problem with owning bitcoin because of who
Speaker 7: runs it, and if you knew, you'd get out, and
Speaker 7: then he doesn't tell you who it is. So am
Speaker 7: I well estimation that's a tacit acceptance that he's okay
Speaker 7: with whoever this is and whatever they do, or maybe.
Speaker 2: He doesn't want to get sued for libel right and
Speaker 2: get into this whole big thing about that. That might
Speaker 2: be his motivation. Look, you know, I don't necessarily he's
Speaker 2: trying to warn people about getting involved in libel lawsuits
Speaker 2: that type of thing.
Speaker 7: So advice may still be good, even if I may
Speaker 7: doubt his credit.
Speaker 2: It was Jeffrey Epstein, for example, who was behind this.
Speaker 2: Do you think people would run for the exits.
Speaker 7: They'd have trouble coin might be the first currency to
Speaker 7: achieve negative value instantaneously. Well this is what Sorry, yeah, sorry,
Speaker 7: go ahead, Sorry to cut you off, but I saw
Speaker 7: an interesting video of John McAfee yesterday talking about who
Speaker 7: he believes the creator bitcoin was.
Speaker 6: Oh yeah, and he just figured out the fact.
Speaker 7: That there's multiple people that were involved. But if you
Speaker 7: look at the writings of Satoshi and the writings of
Speaker 7: the people that were involved, there's only two people that
Speaker 7: speak like Satoshi does using the British spelling of words,
Speaker 7: and only one of them uses a double spacing like
Speaker 7: Satoshi does. And I forget who he said. The guy's
Speaker 7: name was, like Andrew Beck or Becker Maybe I forget,
Speaker 7: but that.
Speaker 2: Was Adam back Back. Yeah, yeah, he's one of the
Speaker 2: people that shows up in this thing. And guess what,
Speaker 2: it's not about the coding folks. That was what we
Speaker 2: talked about yesterday. Don't get so caught up in the coding.
Speaker 2: Oh well, it's open source and we can see what's there,
Speaker 2: so it's all above board, and fine, it's not about
Speaker 2: that at all. That's what the post that I was
Speaker 2: talking about yesterday was really about. And the fact is
Speaker 2: that you don't understand how this whole thing has been
Speaker 2: controlled and funneled, and the infrastructure has been controlled and
Speaker 2: other cryptos were shut down. This is promoted and it's
Speaker 2: those people who are behind it that's the issue. For example,
Speaker 2: what's needed for control? It's not the code, it's not
Speaker 2: the code. Who could have access in the capital to
Speaker 2: build on it? Which projects could get listed on the
Speaker 2: exchanges like coinbase. What was the media narrative that was
Speaker 2: said about it? Who controls the media to pump this
Speaker 2: or to dump that? What did regulators go after, you know,
Speaker 2: the corrupt owned government employees, and which developers got paid,
Speaker 2: which academic institutions legitimized it.
Speaker 6: That's the issue, folks.
Speaker 2: It's not about the open source code, done anything to
Speaker 2: do with Satoshi Nakamoto or whatever this character that they created.
Speaker 2: Because it's really about to sum up again the technical dismissal,
Speaker 2: the ideological purity tests only Bitcoin all the rest of
Speaker 2: them are junk, then the funding starvation for other projects,
Speaker 2: and then pushing this very hard. And let me say
Speaker 2: it might be Epstein the very epicenter of all this stuff.
Speaker 2: A guess who is at the epicenter of it now?
Speaker 8: Trump?
Speaker 2: Trump, the other Pedro, the other best friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: So again you had as I was talking about yesterday.
Speaker 2: I think I got up to the point where they
Speaker 2: were talking about the Bitcoin Foundation. And so the Bitcoin
Speaker 2: Foundation initially was set up, that collapses, goes bankrupt. A
Speaker 2: handful of developers maintaining bitcoin Core, the reference implementation of
Speaker 2: the entire network runs on, suddenly have no funding, They
Speaker 2: have no salaries, they have no institutional support. So Bitcoin's
Speaker 2: next protocol upgrades determined whether not it could scale or
Speaker 2: whether it would die as a niche experiment. So who
Speaker 2: steps into that? Mit Media Labs. Who is a big
Speaker 2: influence and funder of MIT Media Labs Jeffrey Epstein. Ten
Speaker 2: days after founding the Digital Currency Initiative, joy Eto sends
Speaker 2: Epstein an email titled Digital Currency Initiative. The message explains
Speaker 2: how MIT recruited key bitcoin developers after everyone else scrambled
Speaker 2: to step into the vacuum and take control. Eto's note
Speaker 2: to Epstein says, FYI used gift funds to unwrite this,
Speaker 2: which allowed us to move quickly and to win this round.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 2: They got funding from Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's reply is Gavin
Speaker 2: is clever. He donated five hundred and twenty five thousand
Speaker 2: dollars half a million the MIT Media Lab Digital Currency Initiative.
Speaker 2: This funded salaries for Vladimir van der Lahan, Gavin Andresen,
Speaker 2: and Corey Field's. These developers literally decided Bitcoin's technical direction
Speaker 2: during the exact period when Bitcoin's scaling wars would determine
Speaker 2: the future. These developers didn't know where the money ultimately
Speaker 2: came from. It flowed through MIT's normal institutional channels. Plausible
Speaker 2: deniability for them, strategic positioning for Epstein's network. You know,
Speaker 2: there's an saying that maybe you've heard before, but the
Speaker 2: people who control things are controlled by the people who
Speaker 2: always talked about this as engineers, Right. The people who
Speaker 2: control things are controlled by the people who control people,
Speaker 2: and the people who control people are the people who
Speaker 2: control money. That's the hierarchy. That's why Epstein is important
Speaker 2: to the Bitcoin story and so strategic positioning for Epstein's network,
Speaker 2: and that's where he brings in the Blockstream, the island
Speaker 2: and the business trip. So Epstein and joey Eto co
Speaker 2: owned Kiara Investments fifty to fifty ownership, even though Itto
Speaker 2: only put in two thousand versus Epstein's much larger state.
Speaker 2: Kiara invested a half million in Blockstreams twenty fourteen seed Round.
Speaker 2: Blockstream was building proprietary bitcoin infrastructure, side chains and the
Speaker 2: Lightning network, which is going to make it faster processing transactions,
Speaker 2: completing layer one blockchains that could handle high transaction volumes. Natively,
Speaker 2: it was an existential threat to the business models. Suddenly
Speaker 2: the bad for the ecosystem. Email makes perfectly good sense.
Speaker 2: Email correspondence shows Blockstream executive Austin Hill and Adam back
Speaker 2: that you were talking about Travis coordinating meetings with Epstein,
Speaker 2: and it wasn't just Tavis who was talking about it, it
Speaker 2: was it was John McAfee. I think that Adam Beck
Speaker 2: is one of the few people that's doing this, including
Speaker 2: discussions about visiting him in Saint Thomas, the Island, So
Speaker 2: Hill says to Epstein Sunday in New York. I think
Speaker 2: is a no go because of our commitments on the
Speaker 2: West Coast, but Friday or Saturday on the island are
Speaker 2: still possible, and so he gives them instructions about going there.
Speaker 2: January twenty fifteen, Hill emails Epstein asking for advice and
Speaker 2: counsel on a few things, both business, bitcoin, personal and
Speaker 2: esoteric mind games that we play. He adds my apology
Speaker 2: for interrupting and what I'm sure is a crazy media
Speaker 2: storm for you and your team. Remember seeing the lawsuit
Speaker 2: that went public about print Andrew they knew, they all knew.
Speaker 2: They continued to engage with him anyway. Then we get
Speaker 2: a meeting in August of twenty fifteen. The people at
Speaker 2: the meeting are again Joy Ito, Jeffrey Epstein, Elon Musk,
Speaker 2: Mark Zuckerberg, and Peter Teal. They all meet to talk
Speaker 2: about and oh and it was also Reid Hoffman who
Speaker 2: was the one who hosted the dinner. Reid Hoffman LinkedIn
Speaker 2: co founder Epstein, Powell at the Island, and MIT Media
Speaker 2: Lab Advisory Council member. So again all these people Teal, Zuckerberg, Musk, Epstein, Itto,
Speaker 2: they have a dinner on the West Coast. This wasn't
Speaker 2: just a social gathering. This was the crypto institutional strategy
Speaker 2: being discussed at the highest levels of Silicon Valley power
Speaker 2: that MIT's digital currency initiative, which was funded by EPSTEIN,
Speaker 2: is employing Bitcoin's core developers. The same year, Blockstream, funded
Speaker 2: by EPSTEIN, is building Bitcoin infrastructure. So you have the
Speaker 2: MIT digital currency and you have Blockstream, both of them
Speaker 2: funded by EPSTEIN. Same year, the narrative against competing blockchains intensifies,
Speaker 2: and you had Ripple is a good example of this.
Speaker 2: It was excluded because it was a competitor to what
Speaker 2: they were doing with Bitcoin. People were surprised when Trump
Speaker 2: brought Ripple back in because now you know who's talking
Speaker 2: about doing a bitcoin reserve, and then all of a
Speaker 2: sudden he brings in these other currencies that were basically
Speaker 2: set up to be transactional, not to be a commodity.
Speaker 2: That's the hijacking of bitcoins. So many people have talked
Speaker 2: about changing it from a transactional model to a commodity
Speaker 2: model and getting the wolfst crooks involved in it. But
Speaker 2: then Trump started bringing in Ripple again into the bitcoin
Speaker 2: reserve talk, which they never fortunately did. Larry Summers then
Speaker 2: Larry Summer's connection. We've had a lot of emails about
Speaker 2: Larry Summers, and everybody focuses on the rape and pedophile
Speaker 2: and prostitution stuff, so the human trafficking. But this is
Speaker 2: how you get Larry Summers involved in this. As the
Speaker 2: wingman of Jeffrey Epstein, as he referred to him, so
Speaker 2: he called him his wingman, he became a key advisor
Speaker 2: to the Digital Currency Group. And so he says, if
Speaker 2: you don't know what the Digital Currency Group controlled, they
Speaker 2: had Foundry, which was the largest bitcoin mining pool. That
Speaker 2: means that they get to determine which cryptocurrencies get mined
Speaker 2: and which ones are ignored. If they don't mind your cryptocurrency,
Speaker 2: it's dead in the water. Gray scale, the largest bitcoin
Speaker 2: investment vehicle for institutions, coin desk, the most influential cryptomedia outlet,
Speaker 2: the on ramp and off ramp if you will, Well,
Speaker 2: that's a coin base actually, but Genesis Trading major institutional
Speaker 2: lending desk that controls capital flows. So if you stop
Speaker 2: and think about this, control the narrative, you control what
Speaker 2: gets mined. You have an investment vehicle with money, and
Speaker 2: you have a major institutional lending desk for loaning money.
Speaker 2: He says, this is vertical integration that would be illegal,
Speaker 2: and traditional finance. You have mining, media, institutional capital, all
Speaker 2: under one umbrella, all advised by Larry Summers high End,
Speaker 2: the Obama Administration Treasure Department, who Epstein calls, says wingman.
Speaker 2: And so this is why who wrote the code doesn't
Speaker 2: really matter. It's who set up the financial and regulatory
Speaker 2: on ramps and off ramps, and who set up blockades
Speaker 2: for other cryptocurrencies. Who teered everybody and towards bitcoin was
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein right at the center of all of this,
Speaker 2: And so you had problems. At one point in time,
Speaker 2: you had a competition from Ripple because it could do
Speaker 2: three to five second transaction settlements versus Bitcoin's settlements, so
Speaker 2: would take more than ten minutes. In many cases. It
Speaker 2: was a fraction of a penny and fees versus Bitcoin's
Speaker 2: rising transaction costs, minimal energy consumption versus the tremendous amount
Speaker 2: of computing power required for bitcoin, and actual real world
Speaker 2: payment use case. They had a lot of institutions that
Speaker 2: had signed up for Ripple and they were looking at
Speaker 2: it as a way to do international fund transfers. From
Speaker 2: purely's technical standpoint, Ripple was better than Bitcoin. Then December
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, the SEC sues Ripple allegations that it is
Speaker 2: an unregistered security, despite it existing since twenty twelve, for
Speaker 2: eight years without any action, despite former SEC officials suggesting
Speaker 2: that Bitcoin and ethereum weren't securities without addressing others, and
Speaker 2: the fact that Ripple sought regulatory clarity for years without
Speaker 2: getting any all of a sudden they dropped the hammer
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty December of twenty twenty. The timing was surgical,
Speaker 2: the target was deliberate. And who was president in December
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, Oh that's right Trump. Yeah. Anyway, Bitcoin ETF
Speaker 2: applications then started moving forward. And as Tony and I
Speaker 2: have talked about this many times, and he's going to
Speaker 2: be on at the bottom of the hour, why would
Speaker 2: you have an ETF of bitcoin? I mean, it is
Speaker 2: already purely digital. Why would you need that? That to
Speaker 2: me has always been a big red flag of some
Speaker 2: kind of financial scenanigans that are there. Bitcoin characterized as
Speaker 2: common as a commodity by regulators at that point in time,
Speaker 2: and no enforcement actions that gets nitcoin ASUF instead going
Speaker 2: after transactional competitors. So then remember everybody's astonishment when the
Speaker 2: Bitcoin reserve had ripple pin in it by Trump. So
Speaker 2: again they're playing this thing, pumping and dumping, moving it
Speaker 2: back and forth. So again, just remind you of what
Speaker 2: he had to say.
Speaker 3: You knew who was really behind bitcoin, really behind bitcoin,
Speaker 3: you would run as fast as you could to sell it.
Speaker 3: I know, one hundred percent. If you knew who owned
Speaker 3: bitcoin or who started bitcoin, you and you had bitcoin,
Speaker 3: you couldn't sleep at night.
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 5: One hundred percent.
Speaker 3: And when the real founder of bitcoin comes out, it
Speaker 3: is my humble opin and there's nothing humble about me.
Speaker 3: Bitcoin will go to fuking zero one day and Michael
Speaker 3: second Like that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And as Travis was saying, John McAfee had identified
Speaker 2: as a couple of people, and that's what people are saying.
Speaker 2: Two to five people always the names that come up,
Speaker 2: or Adam Back, Austin Hill. Crypto bros. Are now nauseated
Speaker 2: after realizing Bitcoin itself was funded by Jeffrey Epstein, perhaps
Speaker 2: founded by him. We have basically funded an elite global
Speaker 2: pedophile ring since twenty fifteen. I feel sick, said one person.
Speaker 2: Like a hurricane, it tears down even the sturdy of
Speaker 2: storm shelters. The Epstein files have cut a path the
Speaker 2: vast swath of America's intellectual, political, and financial elite. The
Speaker 2: latest trunch of emails related to the sex predator have
Speaker 2: been particularly devastating. Fans of the left leaning not left leaning,
Speaker 2: but left libertarian academic Nom Chomsky I just think he's
Speaker 2: a communist are in shambles after learning the two were
Speaker 2: in close contact until around twenty seventeen. While techluminaries from
Speaker 2: Gates to the Google co founders were similarily caught schmoozing
Speaker 2: with the disgraced financier, Crypto bros are no exception. After
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice released three million files over the weekend,
Speaker 2: blockchain enthusiasts were quick to discover a certain Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: was an active and prominent figure in crypto during its
Speaker 2: formative years. He was basically at the epicenter, putting things
Speaker 2: together on the financial side, regulatory side, and getting the
Speaker 2: biggest backers together. So one file highlighted by crypto investor
Speaker 2: Patrick Riley, shows an email chain between Epstein and joy Eto,
Speaker 2: the former head of MIT's media lab. There's Digital Currency
Speaker 2: Initiative played an integral role in helping crypto grow into
Speaker 2: the giant that it is today. That's what I was
Speaker 2: just talking about. As the email exchange makes clear, Epstein's
Speaker 2: backing was a key pillar in establishing the DGI. He
Speaker 2: was the guy that brought together all the money and
Speaker 2: the tech people, and you know it came up with
Speaker 2: this scheme. Really fyi, Eto told Epstein. He used the
Speaker 2: gift funds under that which was allowed us to move
Speaker 2: forward and quickly win this round.
Speaker 6: Thinks.
Speaker 2: At the same time the letter was written, there are
Speaker 2: about twelve thousand commits to Bitcoin's code, Riley said on
Speaker 2: social media. He said today there are forty seven five
Speaker 2: and eighty three commits to bitcoin code. That means that
Speaker 2: seventy five percent of bitcoin core development and code was
Speaker 2: committed after Jeffrey Epstein took over the de factos senior
Speaker 2: management role as benefactor. And again they need to stop
Speaker 2: focusing on the coding. It's not the coding, it's the
Speaker 2: financial networks, it's the political networks. It's a schmoozing and
Speaker 2: whatever else they did. That shows how these people manipulate everything.
Speaker 2: So Crypto account called crypto Bitlord agonized and said we
Speaker 2: basically funded the entire global pedophile ring since twenty fifteen.
Speaker 2: I feel sick and the people who support Trump need
Speaker 2: to look at his handprints all over everything, even to
Speaker 2: the crypto side of it. So again funding wargaming, pandemics
Speaker 2: with Bill Gates, That's what Epstein was doing and talking
Speaker 2: about how, you know, we need to figure out how
Speaker 2: we're going to get these so called charitable foundations to
Speaker 2: be able to funnel money over to us. That's the
Speaker 2: key thing we got to do. Nobody's really talking to
Speaker 2: Bill Gates about that.
Speaker 6: Again.
Speaker 2: They'll talk about the Salatia stuff. What did he do
Speaker 2: at the island? Did he get a sexually transmitted disease?
Speaker 2: Did he really try to serve titiously treat his wife
Speaker 2: so she wouldn't know that he got a sexually transmitted disease?
Speaker 2: All that kind of stuff. But what is showing is
Speaker 2: that Bill Gates's charitable foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
Speaker 2: was a fraud. It always was about profit. Remember Bill
Speaker 2: Gates has said, I don't know why people hate me
Speaker 2: so much. I'm just trying to help people with health.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to get them vaccines and medical treatment and
Speaker 2: all the rest of this stuff. It's a charitable foundation.
Speaker 2: I'm not making any money from it. Look at the
Speaker 2: Epstein emails. How do we turn that into a way
Speaker 2: to funnel money into us from these charitable organizations. That's
Speaker 2: the big fraud at the core of everything that Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein does. Another crypto account lamented that Bitcoin's been funding
Speaker 2: a global elite pedophile group since twenty fifteen. Great The
Speaker 2: email chain from Ito also suggests that bitcoin's mysterious developer,
Speaker 2: the pseudononymous Satoshi Nakamoto, may have in fact been five
Speaker 2: core developers, each of whom was in talks with Epstein
Speaker 2: and again. John McAfee figured that out a long time ago,
Speaker 2: while the cordevs may have been early Bitcoin contributor Adam Back,
Speaker 2: who invented the proof of work algorithm cited by Knakamoto's
Speaker 2: original white paper on Crypto. A separate email chain shows
Speaker 2: that Edo's suggesting the convicted sex criminal meet with Back
Speaker 2: and other tech luminaries to discuss this revolutionary new currency.
Speaker 6: I think we should have a.
Speaker 2: Meeting with Jeremy Rubin, Adam Back, Seth, Lloyd Martin, Nawick, you,
Speaker 2: and a few others soon about money. In the future
Speaker 2: of finance. A twenty fifteen email, Adam Back had sought
Speaker 2: a meeting with Epstein to secure funding for his crypto
Speaker 2: company Blockstream. Back, along with Blockstream's CEO Austin Hill, is
Speaker 2: trying to schedule a trip to meet in Epstein in
Speaker 2: Saint Thomas. That's what I was just telling you about.
Speaker 2: So again, you don't need to fly to Saint Thomas.
Speaker 2: Just let me know the time, and I'm looking forward
Speaker 2: to it, replied Jeffrey Epstein. So if bitcoin keeps tanking,
Speaker 2: says an article on futurism, it could cause a death
Speaker 2: spiral for the entire economy. And so, you know, we
Speaker 2: got these two things that have been really pumping up.
Speaker 2: Isn't it interesting how Trump has set a stride of
Speaker 2: both of these and profited from both of these with connections.
Speaker 2: You know, he has funneled so much money into his administration.
Speaker 2: We've never seen such open naked corruption as we have
Speaker 2: with Donald Trump. So major cryptocurrency Bitcoin has had absolutely
Speaker 2: horrible start to this year. The digital token has plummeted
Speaker 2: almost fourteen percent so far in twenty twenty six, and
Speaker 2: almost forty percent since hitting an all time high of
Speaker 2: well over one hundred and twenty thousand dollars in October.
Speaker 2: This is his longest losing streak since two thousand and eight.
Speaker 2: Team is down almost three percent the day they wrote
Speaker 2: this as a wake up called anyone who made a
Speaker 2: major investment in crypto, And it may have something to
Speaker 2: do with some people pointing out with the things that
Speaker 2: happened over the weekend with gold, Trump has enriched himself
Speaker 2: enormously with a series of crypto related business moves. And
Speaker 2: again this is not just limited to crypto. Michael Burry,
Speaker 2: the guy that a big part of the movie The
Speaker 2: Big Short in the book is about the man who
Speaker 2: famously shorted the US housing market before it's collapsed in
Speaker 2: two thousand and eight, He's got a nose for these
Speaker 2: types of financial scams. He says it could be Barrett
Speaker 2: Berry says it could be a sign of an impending
Speaker 2: disaster and a substack post this week, he warned that
Speaker 2: further losses for bitcoin could put major scrane on the
Speaker 2: balance sheet of investors that over over extend to crypto,
Speaker 2: leading to further sell offs and a death spiral that
Speaker 2: could be difficult to recover from. And so when you
Speaker 2: look at this massive amounts of money moving in and out,
Speaker 2: and you know where they getting money out of crypto
Speaker 2: and putting it into gold. Well, it appears that some
Speaker 2: of that at least was happening, that was happening with
Speaker 2: the biggest investors, and then were they having to sell
Speaker 2: some of that gold in order to cover some positions
Speaker 2: that they were losing. Who knows anyway, that's kind of
Speaker 2: what Michael Burry thinks. Recent corrections in gold and silver
Speaker 2: prices after year long rallies could be connected to bitcoin woes.
Speaker 2: The US dollar reached a four year low earlier this
Speaker 2: year as investors look abroad for safer bets. The Trump
Speaker 2: administration's regime regime, sorry Trump regime, shaky monetary policy has
Speaker 2: made foreign investments, specifically in Europe, far more tempting. All
Speaker 2: of that uncertainty has caused value gold to make money
Speaker 2: major monetary lead, and we've been talking about this forever.
Speaker 2: No need to get back into that. Meanwhile, cryptocurrencies like
Speaker 2: Bitcoin are tanking. In case the those dies diving cryptocurrency
Speaker 2: were to drop below seventy thousand, Burry warned that the
Speaker 2: financial industry could incur heavy losses. Below fifty thousand, miners
Speaker 2: could be forced to close up shop accompanied by catastrophic
Speaker 2: sell off for precious metals like gold.
Speaker 7: He Saidstein was interested in bitcoin because he heard they
Speaker 7: were talking about miners. He was just very confused about
Speaker 7: the whole entire endeavor.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think he can tell the difference. Actually, that's good. Anyway,
Speaker 2: here's the key thing, tocinized metals. Well, we've always talked
Speaker 2: Tony and I've always talked about paper gold, paper silver.
Speaker 6: Beware of that. And look at this.
Speaker 2: The scammers out there, like Larry Fink, who made his
Speaker 2: fortune off of this real estate housing scam, the securezed
Speaker 2: mortgages and so forth. These guys are just like Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: They're constantly coming up with these schemes, these lies to
Speaker 2: fleece everybody. And now Larry Fink, who is the interim
Speaker 2: President of the World Economic Form taking Klaus Schwab's place
Speaker 2: this year, all he wants to talk about is tokenization,
Speaker 2: and he wants to tokenize everything. And so when you
Speaker 2: look at paper gold and paper silver, that is tokenized
Speaker 2: gold and tokenized silver. And as he's saying here, tokenized
Speaker 2: metal futures will collapse into a black hole with no buyer. Says,
Speaker 2: physical medals may break from the trend on safe haven demand.
Speaker 2: If you don't hold it in your hand, you don't
Speaker 2: own it. Bury's bearish stance predicting a major death spiral.
Speaker 2: He has a long record of criticizing cryptocurrencies for being
Speaker 2: worth and comparing them to the tulip bubble crisis of
Speaker 2: the sixteen hundreds. Following his famous shortening of the two
Speaker 2: thousand and eight housing crisis, The hedgehron manager has also
Speaker 2: made plenty of wrong calls, however, over the years. But
Speaker 2: given the massive investments well over one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: public companies have made in bitcoin, the token's recent downturn
Speaker 2: could indeed foreshadow difficult days out of investors desperately trying
Speaker 2: to cut their losses, which then brings us I don't
Speaker 2: say this before we get tony on, which brings us
Speaker 2: to AI. Other headline investors dumping American stocks as the
Speaker 2: country bets everything on AI, dumping everything else, dumping all
Speaker 2: other stocks and bonds and equities so they can get
Speaker 2: their money onto AI, that other bubble. So which bubble
Speaker 2: is going to bust first? Is it going to be
Speaker 2: the Bitcoin bubble? Is it going to be the AI bubble?
Speaker 2: So again, you still have. You know, people out there
Speaker 2: may able to sell their Bitcoin and buy in Vidia,
Speaker 2: you know, jump from one bubble to the next, hoping
Speaker 2: these bubbles aren't going to break. But what they're doing
Speaker 2: really is they're arranging the uh, they're playing musical chairs
Speaker 2: on the deck of the Titanic. Really, the AI boom
Speaker 2: has sent tech company evaluations short at soaring. The magnificent
Speaker 2: seven Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Vidia and Tesla
Speaker 2: now account for just over a third of the entire
Speaker 2: SMP five hundred, experts warning that the industry could be
Speaker 2: propping up a rough looking US economy. So things are
Speaker 2: not looking too good except for just those few. And
Speaker 2: they're getting very, very heavily into debt, many of them
Speaker 2: for these AI data centers, as Bloomberg and other some
Speaker 2: other bankers have talked about. They said, they're buying up
Speaker 2: all the credit out there, they're buying up junk credit
Speaker 2: out there, just so that they can fund these AI
Speaker 2: data centers. They're getting desperate, and even these big guys
Speaker 2: are pouring so much money into it that they're soaking
Speaker 2: up all the credit that's out there, even junkie stuff.
Speaker 2: And as they point out that they're not even talking
Speaker 2: about making money anymore. They're making money. Aspect of this
Speaker 2: is so far down the road. This whole thing is
Speaker 2: looking unbelievably shaky. The IMF warned that we can ing
Speaker 2: hype surrounding AI could be among the biggest risks to
Speaker 2: global economic growth, noting that if the expectations about AI
Speaker 2: turn out to be too optimistic, a market correction could
Speaker 2: send shockwaves across global markets. That's what always happens. You
Speaker 2: get a new technology, like the Internet, the dot com bust.
Speaker 2: People don't know really how it's going to shake out,
Speaker 2: but they know this is going to be really big.
Speaker 2: It's going to change a lot of things fundamentally. They're
Speaker 2: not exactly sure where the money is going to be
Speaker 2: coming from yet, but everybody wants to jump into it
Speaker 2: because it's the latest thing and it's going to be
Speaker 2: some very disruptive thing. It's going to be huge. But
Speaker 2: then after a while and the money is not coming
Speaker 2: back out, maybe they start to have second thoughts and
Speaker 2: they aren't sure how they're going to monetize this new thing,
Speaker 2: and somebody people start running for the exits. So it's
Speaker 2: going to go the same way Trump a huge AI booster,
Speaker 2: and of course a crypto huckster, as well as underlining
Speaker 2: the circular nature of the whole situation, celebrated the weakening dollar,
Speaker 2: arguing that it would make products more affordable. Officials had
Speaker 2: to step into smooth things over. The New York Times
Speaker 2: reported arguing that despite Trump's comments, the US government still
Speaker 2: wants a strong dollar. Well, historically, safer bets like gold
Speaker 2: are proving far more lucrative, reaching record highs in January alone.
Speaker 6: And so even though we.
Speaker 2: Had this big sell off, gold is still up an
Speaker 2: amazing amount month over the month, just in the first
Speaker 2: month of January, even with that selloff, and year over
Speaker 2: year it's up over seventy percent. And so again the
Speaker 2: question is, are these tech companies showing signs of distress?
Speaker 2: Are they running out of money, running out of places
Speaker 2: where they can go to get loans. Bank of America
Speaker 2: managing head of Global Credit says, you've got to turn
Speaker 2: over all the avenues to make this work. They're going
Speaker 2: out getting junk debt, private credit, asset backed loans. Increasingly
Speaker 2: desperate moves, says Bloombergy. And so this bubble is starting
Speaker 2: to get toward the end here. I think many AI
Speaker 2: companies have essentially given up on even pretending their short
Speaker 2: term or medium term goal is to make money. They
Speaker 2: are measuring ambition, not success. So it's a very shaky
Speaker 2: situation that we're in. So we're going to get Tony
Speaker 2: on to talk about this. We're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 8: Stay with us, no.
Speaker 1: Analyzing the globalist next move and now the Deevid.
Speaker 6: Nutshell all right?
Speaker 2: Joining us now is Tony Arburn of Wisewolf, Gold and Silver,
Speaker 2: And of course you can get to Tony through David Knight,
Speaker 2: not Gold. Lets him know that you came through us.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us, Tony. It's been another interesting week,
Speaker 2: hasn't it with gold and silver?
Speaker 5: Interesting week? When I got off air with you last week,
Speaker 5: at this time gold was trading around fifty five hundred
Speaker 5: and fifty six hundred an ounce, and then the next
Speaker 5: day I woke up and I set prices and I
Speaker 5: started to see just the red on the screen. And
Speaker 5: the same thing with silver. It went from like one
Speaker 5: hundred and ten dollars an ounce down to seventy something, yeah,
Speaker 5: about thirty percent or something. That gold dropped almost one
Speaker 5: thousand dollars an ounce and then bounced back. So yeah,
Speaker 5: at the top it was fifty seven hundred that's last week,
Speaker 5: and then down to forty seven hundred or so. And
Speaker 5: that happened in a twenty four hour period. So yeah,
Speaker 5: why we'll survive the largest downturn of gold and silver
Speaker 5: and history in a flash like that.
Speaker 6: So wow, R, I don't envy you.
Speaker 2: I don't know how you do it, because I'll tell
Speaker 2: you this is Yeah, this is absolutely crazy. The big
Speaker 2: swings that are going back and forth. What do you
Speaker 2: think I mean some people have said that they think that,
Speaker 2: of course, a lot of people are getting out of bitcoin,
Speaker 2: perhaps getting into gold. Maybe these guys are then selling
Speaker 2: off gold because they got to cover short positions that
Speaker 2: are starting to drop. What do you think was going
Speaker 2: on behind that? Well, I think it's a lot of factors.
Speaker 5: The Wash nomination carried a certain psychological weight to it.
Speaker 5: A lot of people went back to his previous remarks
Speaker 5: about a strong dollar and his supportive of things like
Speaker 5: bitcoin and other things, and there was this feeling that, oh, well,
Speaker 5: the dollar is going to be strengthened. That was at
Speaker 5: least some of the press release that was out, but
Speaker 5: if you're following any of this or paying attention, you know,
Speaker 5: the Trump administration and Trump himself has talked about the
Speaker 5: need for a week dollar. The whole premise of everything
Speaker 5: that if there is a strategy here at all, the
Speaker 5: strategy is just a week dollar. And the you know,
Speaker 5: the berating of Jerome Powell for not lowering rates over
Speaker 5: the last year. You think that the new nominees not
Speaker 5: going to just lower rates. I mean, that's where we're going.
Speaker 5: We're going to lower rates, We're going to print, We're
Speaker 5: going to expand the money supply. That's the entire system
Speaker 5: is built off of that. So I thought that was
Speaker 5: a false narrative that was launched that pulled the price
Speaker 5: down a bit. But honestly, I think the system itself
Speaker 5: can't handle these prices the way that they are, David,
Speaker 5: I'm seeing in it on my level. You know, the
Speaker 5: wholesalers are now not even locking trades anymore. You can't
Speaker 5: you can't get liquid for seven to ten days. It's
Speaker 5: a three to four week window to get paid out
Speaker 5: at wholesalers. The whole system is cracking because everybody's trying
Speaker 5: to sell it at once. And of course there are buyers.
Speaker 5: You know, the average buying from central banks of gold
Speaker 5: alone last year was twenty seven tons a month, twenty
Speaker 5: seven tons a month in the year of twenty twenty five.
Speaker 5: So no, none of the demand is going away. All
Speaker 5: the fundamentals are there, All the demand is there, but
Speaker 5: it's bottlenecked and the prices are inviting, you know, the
Speaker 5: speculation to sell and to trade and the whole thing.
Speaker 5: Even the London Exchange last week quote unquote air quotes.
Speaker 5: You know, they shut down because there was an internet
Speaker 5: issue or something. You know, they just shut down because
Speaker 5: these prices you're swinging all over the place, you can
Speaker 5: put you out of business. Yeah, and I think I
Speaker 5: think the stress on the market is definitely showing up.
Speaker 5: But the prices will go back above five thousand in
Speaker 5: gold for sure. One hundred dollars an ounce silver. We
Speaker 5: finally broke. The paper market is breaking. Yeah, And so
Speaker 5: there's there's a lot of factors here and again when
Speaker 5: people feel like, oh, well it's the dollar's fine, Like
Speaker 5: that's the sentiment from like the Wall Street you know,
Speaker 5: the people that watch CNBC, Oh, the dollar's going to
Speaker 5: be fine because now everything's gonna come out in the wash.
Speaker 5: You know, we're gonna put everything to the wash. It's
Speaker 5: gonna be fine, and it's it's not so they may
Speaker 5: sell off positions in paper or do something and move
Speaker 5: do profit taking in gold or silver and then get
Speaker 5: into what AI stocks or I heard the last segment
Speaker 5: that you know you're bringing in the show.
Speaker 6: And where are they going?
Speaker 5: Where do you go? And you know we can talk
Speaker 5: bitcoin and other things. I think there's just a lot
Speaker 5: happening right now that are not normal market conditions. And
Speaker 5: you know, I'm just happy to be here and still
Speaker 5: survive it.
Speaker 2: It's yeah, congratulations on that's crazy. Well, you know again,
Speaker 2: I've been saying that waite till Trump does his pick.
Speaker 2: Now he picked somebody that I think is you knowsh
Speaker 2: I think is going to be a whitewash of what
Speaker 2: he really wants to do. Right, But we've seen Trump
Speaker 2: do this kind of stuff before. Oh look he's got cash.
Speaker 2: Me telling Den Bongino, Now we're really going to see
Speaker 2: the FBI get honest really right, So you think that
Speaker 2: anybody thinks that Kevin Walsh is going to be honest
Speaker 2: with us stuff, if you think that he's not going
Speaker 2: to do exactly what Trump wants done. You haven't been
Speaker 2: paying attention to Trump or anything else.
Speaker 5: Trump even joked, you know, I'll follow a lawsuit if
Speaker 5: he doesn't lower interest rates, even joked about it already.
Speaker 2: That's right, you know, lower interest rates and also probably
Speaker 2: do quantitative easing as well.
Speaker 6: You know Trump wants.
Speaker 5: This is this is the big print, I mean, and
Speaker 5: the book by Larry Laparde, you know he put this
Speaker 5: thesis out a couple of years ago. It's the big
Speaker 5: print and in this one big massive push before they
Speaker 5: reset the whole monetary system. And I think that's what
Speaker 5: we're being primed for right now. As I was saying
Speaker 5: to you off air, these little signposts on the road
Speaker 5: if you're paying attention. Tether has one hundred and eighty
Speaker 5: seven billion dollar market cap. Now what does tether do?
Speaker 6: Right? Tether?
Speaker 5: If you want to hold a digital dollar, it's tethered
Speaker 5: to the dollar. Yeah, you put in the system and
Speaker 5: they go buy treasuries or they'll buy gold or do something.
Speaker 5: It backs whatever one to one that you do. And
Speaker 5: they've had a huge they buy gold like a central bank.
Speaker 5: Now they have big coin holdings. Yeah, so just that
Speaker 5: one stable coin one hundred and eighty seven billion dollar
Speaker 5: market cap.
Speaker 2: And again stable coin is I think the it's like
Speaker 2: the masked ice agents or something. This is the mask
Speaker 2: that pretends that it's not CBDC, but it is CBDC.
Speaker 2: It's got all the characteristics of CBDC. They made sure
Speaker 2: it had it, but it is. Larry Luttnik also a
Speaker 2: friend in Powell long term post pedophile conviction. Even Larry
Speaker 2: Lutnik a big pal of Jeffrey Epstein and tether is
Speaker 2: his baby, and he's now our commerce secretary. What you know,
Speaker 2: we look at this, we got a Treasury secretary who
Speaker 2: is a sources right hand man. We've got Larry luck
Speaker 2: Nikkou has been Jeffrey Epstein's right hand man and working
Speaker 2: on the tether coin and the stable coins and stuff
Speaker 2: like that, which they want to move us into. The
Speaker 2: previous Commerce secretary that you had from a Trump administration
Speaker 2: was Wilbur Ross, who was a Ross Child agent all
Speaker 2: his life. Does anybody get a clue what's going on
Speaker 2: with the Trump regime? I mean, it's crazy, isn't it.
Speaker 5: One of my favorite memes in the last few years
Speaker 5: is just it shows the Earth and there's an arrow
Speaker 5: pointing towards it and says you are here paying taxes
Speaker 5: to pedophiles if you want to know.
Speaker 1: Where you are.
Speaker 5: And I always thought that was fun. But yeah, when
Speaker 5: you dig deep enough and you find the roots of
Speaker 5: all these things, it's why people have always been I mean,
Speaker 5: it's skeptical of anything. That mean, gold's manipulated, Silver's manipulated.
Speaker 5: Bitcoin maybe not its origin, but you know, somewhere along
Speaker 5: the way, and maybe for nefarious purposes, things have happened
Speaker 5: to Bitcoin or steered a certain way. That's certainly a potentiality.
Speaker 5: And you know, I see the interconnected of us. Although
Speaker 5: there's no white night in any of this. I mean,
Speaker 5: but at the end of the day, we're in a
Speaker 5: monetary shift historically the lights which has never been seen.
Speaker 5: We've never actually gone through what we're going through.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 5: There's no other historical precedent that's been set, you know,
Speaker 5: to see a world reserve currency diminish the way that
Speaker 5: it is, like the dollar's doing. And this monetary reset
Speaker 5: happening with all the other countries banding together and gold
Speaker 5: reclaiming its place. At the same time, it's I think
Speaker 5: a race to figure out where value is. So everything's
Speaker 5: being repriced and sold off and bought off, and I
Speaker 5: think even manipulated for reasons for accumulation. So I can
Speaker 5: certainly get into that.
Speaker 2: And then you know, the reason we focus on physical
Speaker 2: possession of gold and silver is because you got these
Speaker 2: people like Epstein and Larry Fink and the rest of them.
Speaker 2: We're always coming up with these devices to try to
Speaker 2: take everything from everybody. And that's the fundamental part of
Speaker 2: the great taking. How they have gone through and changed
Speaker 2: the UCC definitions and the hierarchy of if there's a
Speaker 2: major financial collapse, the hierarchy of who gets to keep what.
Speaker 2: And it turns out that if you think you want
Speaker 2: a stock or bond, your way down the list. The
Speaker 2: bokers are going to get paid, the bankers are going
Speaker 2: to get paid. You're probably not going to get paid
Speaker 2: because you're further down the list if there is a
Speaker 2: great financial crisis that they have engineered. And so that's
Speaker 2: what's really behind all this stuff. That's why you've got
Speaker 2: to get physical with things. And we've talked for the
Speaker 2: longest time about paper gold and paper silver, but again
Speaker 2: they're pushing so hard on tokenizing and securitizing everything, and
Speaker 2: it's just the two thousand and eight mortgage crisis on steroids.
Speaker 2: They take real things like real estate and houses and
Speaker 2: they put it into this kind of artificial construct that
Speaker 2: they've created so they can manipulate and steal things from people.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing. Got a couple of questions for you,
Speaker 2: Tony Ratisbro. Thank you for the tip, he says, for Tony,
Speaker 2: now that the mystery of bitcoin is over, and I
Speaker 2: don't know that we know the mystery of it, but
Speaker 2: certainly we can see the structure of the organization, the funding,
Speaker 2: the political stuff that's there, and see how that was
Speaker 2: all kind of centered around Epstein and these elites that
Speaker 2: are focused around him. And I mean it's not just
Speaker 2: that he's one of the elites and he's partying with him.
Speaker 2: I mean he's putting this together with the guys that
Speaker 2: many people think actually were Satoshi Nakamoto the pseudonym, you know,
Speaker 2: a couple of guys who were developers.
Speaker 6: He's putting this stuff all together.
Speaker 2: Anyway, he says, So what do you think is going
Speaker 2: to happen to Bitcoin, Maxi's will they sell and change
Speaker 2: their grift or they keep the bitcoin grift rolling so
Speaker 2: they don't get poor.
Speaker 6: What do you think is going to happen with that.
Speaker 5: I don't think bitcoin's going away. I think I mean, honestly,
Speaker 5: I'm a bit, a bit agnostic on all of this.
Speaker 5: They look through a lot of the stuff that dropped,
Speaker 5: and there's some people that I follow that I've seen
Speaker 5: analysis on. As far as with the Epstein involvement, he
Speaker 5: was a donor to mi I T so he's donating
Speaker 5: to these departments where they were working on bitcoin and
Speaker 5: its infancy past the publishing of the white paper and
Speaker 5: the first transactions that you know that were done like
Speaker 5: January third, when bitcoin January third, two thousand and nine,
Speaker 5: when bitcoin came online, and of course you go back
Speaker 5: to the white paper came out on Halloween actually in
Speaker 5: October two thousand.
Speaker 2: That's kind of a significant considering a theme as occultism.
Speaker 5: They have, I mean, it's one three and ten thirty one,
Speaker 5: and there's some other key dates in bitcoin. You have
Speaker 5: the the first pizza they bought, the pizza with it
Speaker 5: and everything else. But I don't think that bitcoin is
Speaker 5: going away. I don't think it's gonna completely tank or
Speaker 5: anything like that. I think, honestly, I'm wondering if there's
Speaker 5: some triangulation in all of this for more accumulation at
Speaker 5: a lower price. I mean, we've seen that it can
Speaker 5: easily get hit one hundred thousand. It'll go back. I
Speaker 5: think it'll be back above that sometime this year, maybe
Speaker 5: next year. But it has I think it has a
Speaker 5: story yet to tell. There's nothing that there's nothing like bitcoin,
Speaker 5: So I don't know that's that remains to be seen.
Speaker 5: I could be wrong, by the way, I could be wrong,
Speaker 5: and I've always said that about my stance with bitcoin,
Speaker 5: because fundamentally, I think what bitcoin has done, if it
Speaker 5: does nothing else, even if it goes to zero right now,
Speaker 5: even if it crashed and became worthless, it changed a
Speaker 5: lot of people's minds, the people that actually started to
Speaker 5: look into it and look into the reasons why are
Speaker 5: supposedly the reasons why the the entire network was put
Speaker 5: into place, and what what the philosophy of setoshi was
Speaker 5: and what it was built for. You know, this is
Speaker 5: after the two thousand and eight crisis and started, you know,
Speaker 5: bailing out the banks too big to fail and jail
Speaker 5: and all that stuff, and this was that was an
Speaker 5: unprecedented government you know, printing of currency and that link
Speaker 5: between the central Bank and the government and all the
Speaker 5: rest that was happening to the money supply and the corruption.
Speaker 5: So I think bitcoin changed minds. It definitely changed. Uh,
Speaker 5: it changed history. So we'll see what happens with it.
Speaker 5: I don't think it's going away though, Yeah, yeah, it's uh.
Speaker 5: And of course many people have talked about the hijacking
Speaker 5: of bitcoin, how it started out as they replaced for
Speaker 5: currency and for money, but then they turn it into
Speaker 5: something like a commodity. And then you get to people
Speaker 5: like Epstein and Larry Fink and these guys, and it
Speaker 5: looks like they want to take them a guffin and
Speaker 5: securitize it, you know, make it into a token. And
Speaker 5: so it's I look at.
Speaker 2: It and it's just like, no, there's just too many
Speaker 2: layers and too many people like the ones who brought
Speaker 2: us two thousand and eight involved. It's a hard pass
Speaker 2: for me. Another question for you. February twenty seventh is
Speaker 2: a start date for the deliveries of the March Contract.
Speaker 2: I've seen videos where they claim there will be a default.
Speaker 2: Is this true or is this AI generated garbage? Does
Speaker 2: Tony think there will be a default of the comics
Speaker 2: with March being a delivery month, what do you think.
Speaker 5: I think it's unlikely that there will be some massive
Speaker 5: default across the board, and it may be right now.
Speaker 5: I mean these large institutions, you have to remember, they've
Speaker 5: got much more sophisticated equipment to run simulate, and they've
Speaker 5: got intel and things, and they'll be moving stuff around
Speaker 5: to try to avoid anything like that. But it is
Speaker 5: I mean, it is possible, but I would put that
Speaker 5: as a very unlike. There's so much garbage floating around
Speaker 5: about gold and silver right now. There's so many grifters
Speaker 5: on the on the people send me stuff all the time,
Speaker 5: you know, I've seen people send me stuff like, hey,
Speaker 5: this these dealers all over the country saying people are
Speaker 5: lined out their doors buying silver. And I'm like, really,
Speaker 5: because I have two shops and two states, I don't
Speaker 5: see any what are you talking about? And then they'll
Speaker 5: send me stuff about oh that you see Trump is
Speaker 5: going to put silver as some sort of like securitized
Speaker 5: thing and and and uh put it into the strategic
Speaker 5: reserve and all Americans must turn in their silver. I've
Speaker 5: seen so much stuff floating around so people canna get clicks,
Speaker 5: But that's might that might be one of those one
Speaker 5: of those little drops you know about the comax. You
Speaker 5: got to be careful of any of that stuff, either
Speaker 5: doom or gloom or if it's pie in the sky
Speaker 5: and just a middle road. The metals markets are insane
Speaker 5: right now, That's right. But I don't think they're I
Speaker 5: don't think they're catastrophic and I don't think we're going
Speaker 5: to have massive plunge either way.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and a lot of people are looking at this
Speaker 2: and you know, saying this is the end of paper
Speaker 2: stuff because you've got the large exchanges are scrambling around
Speaker 2: for for actual physical gold and physical silver.
Speaker 5: Well, that's right, I mean, and it's that game has
Speaker 5: been played so long, but now it's I think we're,
Speaker 5: like I've mentioned before, the stepped out of the realm
Speaker 5: of of where markets took us in the past, and
Speaker 5: we've entered into governmental financial warfare. You know, this is
Speaker 5: between governments and large institutions. It's between militaries and their
Speaker 5: developmental arms and things of you know, strategic stockpiles and
Speaker 5: things for both medals, not just to the monetary side
Speaker 5: for gold, but the industrial side for silver. So we've
Speaker 5: we've crossed a boundary that is no longer about just
Speaker 5: market forces, so what we're way beyond.
Speaker 6: That, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so you know when we look at the push,
Speaker 2: you're trying to get everybody into stable coins. I think
Speaker 2: that's going to be a big part of it as well.
Speaker 2: But again the physical aspects. I've got a couple more
Speaker 2: questions here. Stevez says, we need to know as Tony
Speaker 2: buying medals again, if so, why and if.
Speaker 8: Not why.
Speaker 5: I never stopped. There was one I paused on Friday
Speaker 5: of last week in the afternoon just because I didn't know.
Speaker 5: The prices kept coming down so fast. I couldn't. I
Speaker 5: couldn't lock prices. That's so we're literally flying a little
Speaker 5: bit blind right now. I can't lock anywhere. I can't,
Speaker 5: so no hosletsalers will lock my price. If I get
Speaker 5: one to lock it, it might take me a month
Speaker 5: to get paid. So there's there's going to be have
Speaker 5: to be some changes. I'm just rolling with the punches.
Speaker 5: But no whise Wolf's sill available to buy a product.
Speaker 5: But I would ask people, why are you selling if
Speaker 5: you don't have to, I would wait, you're going to
Speaker 5: get a better premium. Let this market stabilize the reason
Speaker 5: that dealers are having a hard time paying out near
Speaker 5: spot like we used to. I'd be happy to pay
Speaker 5: out near spot. It's a happier customer. The problem is
Speaker 5: is that there's nowhere to sell it to, and if
Speaker 5: you try to sell it, like a lot of the
Speaker 5: places that used to get quick turnarounds, they're not liquid
Speaker 5: so you can't get out. And so these you know,
Speaker 5: dealers are buying it twenty thirty percent under spot and
Speaker 5: people are mad at that about that. Well, if you
Speaker 5: don't need to sell right now, don't, because what will
Speaker 5: happen is all that bottleneck will get worked out, all
Speaker 5: the contracts will be filled and everything will be fine again,
Speaker 5: and the premiums and the buying percentages will come up
Speaker 5: because the market will stabilize. So I think selling right
Speaker 5: now is a bad idea if you don't have to.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, trump Berger. What are Tony thoughts on
Speaker 2: the gold and silver ratio?
Speaker 5: It's starting to correct into its natural territory. I've I
Speaker 5: think I've read about this for years. I think we've
Speaker 5: just had this weird upside down mismatch of what the
Speaker 5: gold silver ratio is supposed to be. Its history shows
Speaker 5: us it's between ten to twenty to one is about
Speaker 5: the way that you should price gold and silver. That's
Speaker 5: the way history's always been. We were sixteen to one
Speaker 5: at the founding of the United States. Up until nineteen
Speaker 5: thirty three. It's estimated that it's seventeen to one geologically,
Speaker 5: so there's seventeen ounces of silver for every one ounce
Speaker 5: of gold, So a there's a natural component. I think
Speaker 5: it's finding its new balance. And I think what the
Speaker 5: see the paper market has always done this. It's skewed
Speaker 5: the gold silver ratio so drastically that it was just ridiculous.
Speaker 5: At one time, it was one hundred and twenty five
Speaker 5: to one. Wow, and that was the first quarter of
Speaker 5: twenty twenty and at one time, and you couldn't buy
Speaker 5: silver for that price, by the way, because people were
Speaker 5: calling I think it was twelve dollars an ounce, and
Speaker 5: people were calling me saying I need to place an
Speaker 5: order for silver. I'm like, there is none. I can't
Speaker 5: lock it anywhere because nobody wanted to sell at that price.
Speaker 5: So it's funny you'd have a market saying this is
Speaker 5: the price, but there's literally no supply. And that's when
Speaker 5: I started going way away in a minute, so you're
Speaker 5: to and that's the manipulation of the paper. Now it's
Speaker 5: just chaos everywhere. It's like you could have short supply
Speaker 5: and everybody wants to sell. Yeah, and so it's so
Speaker 5: upside down and all over the place. I think there's
Speaker 5: just the main reason is is because we're seeing like
Speaker 5: the rapid decline of the dollar and these other nations
Speaker 5: moving out of the current andy into something else.
Speaker 2: Yes, I said at the beginning of this week, and
Speaker 2: I've had the big sell off of the weekend. I said,
Speaker 2: this is another Yukon Cornelius buying moment, because the fundamentals
Speaker 2: haven't really changed. You know, markets will panic and you know,
Speaker 2: everybody will get wind of something and they'll go run
Speaker 2: chase it. And I remember there was we bought a
Speaker 2: dog for my aunt once and we because she loved dogs,
Speaker 2: but she just wouldn't make the leap to do it.
Speaker 2: And we knew which kind of dog she liked, and
Speaker 2: so went to the breeder and they had a whole bunch.
Speaker 6: Of these dogs.
Speaker 2: It was like, you know, ten or fifteen of them
Speaker 2: or something, and they're like little Scottish car in terriers.
Speaker 2: I think it's what it was. And they'd come around
Speaker 2: and they were all kind of feisty, and they'd be
Speaker 2: one of them would think that he heard something in
Speaker 2: the corner of the yard, and he'd go barking and
Speaker 2: running that way, and the rest of them would just
Speaker 2: follow me, like a like a mob, you know. They
Speaker 2: go run, and they all go over there bark, and
Speaker 2: then they realize there's nothing there. And then one of
Speaker 2: them thinks there's something at the other corner of the yard,
Speaker 2: and they all go run and just going back and forth.
Speaker 2: And I said, this is like the stock exchange here,
Speaker 2: you know, this is one person things, they see something,
Speaker 2: they all go run for the exit. So they all
Speaker 2: go run to jump on board whatever this thing is,
Speaker 2: and then they start chasing the next new Faulse signal
Speaker 2: that's out there. So there's a lot of all two
Speaker 2: of that it's going on here. But the fundamentals are
Speaker 2: still the fundamentals, the things that have fundamentally been driving
Speaker 2: this over and above any kinds of market manipulations. Those
Speaker 2: things are still there. The stuff that you and I
Speaker 2: have talked about for the longest time, the financial system
Speaker 2: and the loss of trust in the US dollar, the
Speaker 2: massive federal cumulative debt that Trump doesn't care or talk
Speaker 2: about at all, but he keeps stoking it more than anybody,
Speaker 2: And again he set us on a whole new path
Speaker 2: of debt accumulation. In twenty twenty, Biden kept that same
Speaker 2: rate up, and so has Trump. He added another two
Speaker 2: trillion dollars last year. We're going to be up to
Speaker 2: forty trillion by the fall at the current rate. But
Speaker 2: I think he's probably going to have some new, big
Speaker 2: spending programs that are going to happen before then. And
Speaker 2: so again that's one of the reasons why he is
Speaker 2: so focused on the interest rates, because the service charges
Speaker 2: on that debt are so crushing and it's going to
Speaker 2: wind up taking such a huge chunk of the entire
Speaker 2: federal deficit. But something's got to break. It's not based
Speaker 2: on reality, and so I think that's the key thing.
Speaker 2: And the other key thing to think about is how
Speaker 2: these people have manipulated these investment structures. Stocks and bonds
Speaker 2: have been manipulatd And I'm not talking about them orchestrating
Speaker 2: a buy or sell to move the market in different ways.
Speaker 2: I'm talking about how they have gone through and changed
Speaker 2: the UCC code so that when they create a giant
Speaker 2: crash like they did back in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 2: they can go in and take the title to your
Speaker 2: securities and your stocks and things like that. And how
Speaker 2: they don't want to just stop there. They want to
Speaker 2: tokenize everything, so they can do that to everything. That's
Speaker 2: the key thing. That's why physical it's so important, is.
Speaker 5: You're absolutely right, and it becomes more and more apparent
Speaker 5: that the counterparty risk is a risk that you don't
Speaker 5: want to take. It seems to be a very small
Speaker 5: portion of whatever you do. I mean, just for the
Speaker 5: sake of transparency. Every day I use cash app and
Speaker 5: I buy a little bit of stocks like a time.
Speaker 5: We're talking like a tiny bit like lunch money. You know,
Speaker 5: I'll just I'll not go out to lunch that day,
Speaker 5: and I'll pay for you know, whatever stocks I by.
Speaker 5: And I'll buy some petroleum stocks. I know a grit
Speaker 5: friend of mine that I grew up with. I know
Speaker 5: the company he's an executive for, So I trust that company.
Speaker 5: He's going to find some oil, and I buy a
Speaker 5: little bit of that and some silver mining stocks. But
Speaker 5: we're talking like nothing. Over time, it can compounds, but
Speaker 5: I'm not going to I'm doing that with the full
Speaker 5: knowledge that I might not be able to catch those
Speaker 5: things in or they can just inflate the amount of
Speaker 5: stock that they have. I mean, they literally can do that.
Speaker 5: That's just something that's always been the case. So you
Speaker 5: can get a little bit of a return on that.
Speaker 5: But where else do I put the majority of my
Speaker 5: of everything else that I do. It's either in my
Speaker 5: own business, something I can see that I can hold,
Speaker 5: that I own, that are you know, that is in
Speaker 5: my possession. I want less counterparty risk, and it may
Speaker 5: not be as fun or as exciting or thrilling, and
Speaker 5: you may not get these big returns the way that
Speaker 5: you could possibly could get in the traditional markets. But
Speaker 5: I don't think that in this environment with as many, yeah,
Speaker 5: with as many crooks as we as, I don't think
Speaker 5: it's unprecedented, or at least they're just not as smart
Speaker 5: as their predecessors to you know, cover up their crists
Speaker 5: and follies. And we just got a lot of crooks
Speaker 5: running stuff.
Speaker 2: Oh man, they are really unbelievable sharks, you know, when
Speaker 2: you look at people like Epstein and Fink and so forth.
Speaker 2: I like this comment here Tony, This is my Mike
Speaker 2: nineteen ninety six. My unmarried daughters are buying medals so
Speaker 2: when they get married, they'll be able to stay home
Speaker 2: and homeschool their kids. Now that's long term thinking. That's
Speaker 2: a great idea now, and that's the way you need
Speaker 2: to be thinking, you know, buy and hold strategy. Uh,
Speaker 2: and just to prepare for a rainy day because storm
Speaker 2: clouds are on the horizon. They really aren't have been
Speaker 2: for quite some time.
Speaker 5: Well, they really are. And again, those fundamentals don't change.
Speaker 5: We can't stop the collapse of the of the system.
Speaker 5: That's that is.
Speaker 6: I think.
Speaker 5: It's inevitable. We can't start. Now what's it going to
Speaker 5: look like? Does that mean it's mad Max and you know,
Speaker 5: the apocalypse or anything. I don't. I don't necessarily think
Speaker 5: it has to come to that, But there's so many
Speaker 5: scenarios on the table, and uh, we can't control that outcome.
Speaker 5: You can control what you can control, like you your
Speaker 5: ability to make good decisions based on the information, not
Speaker 5: what you want to believe. That's the hardest part about
Speaker 5: living in this environment. Yeah, because it's by design. I
Speaker 5: think the the dichotomy is so stark. You know, between
Speaker 5: the left right paradigm and then people that fall into
Speaker 5: the Fox News camp or the MSNBC camp or whatever
Speaker 5: they are ms now whatever that is. Now it's become
Speaker 5: even I think, more solidified. And that's really shocking because
Speaker 5: there's so much to understand about our current reality that
Speaker 5: just gets missed by the majority now because you have
Speaker 5: to pick a side, and what if both sides are wrong?
Speaker 5: You know, That's that's where I think where we what
Speaker 5: we talk about. It's like the agenda is just to
Speaker 5: know the truth, and if I have the best information,
Speaker 5: I can make better decisions and not what I want
Speaker 5: to believe.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: It's just like I put bitcoin on my logo right
Speaker 5: for Texas, and the bitcoin may have a it may
Speaker 5: crash out, it may be I've always said this and
Speaker 5: I'll write it to zero. It's fine. I can be wrong,
Speaker 5: but if I if I see information that changes my mind,
Speaker 5: I'll make a better decision. You know. This is that's
Speaker 5: where I try to be as pliable as I can.
Speaker 5: And I'm definitely not a a cultist around precious metals either.
Speaker 5: You know, there's there's going to be drawbacks and there's
Speaker 5: going to be downturns in any of these markets. It's
Speaker 5: we're living through crazy times.
Speaker 6: And think about this.
Speaker 5: It took forty five years for silver to break its
Speaker 5: all time high, and then once it did and this
Speaker 5: is just last year. And then once it did, because
Speaker 5: we'd always talk about it, you know, this was the
Speaker 5: all time high silver, it's forty five years and then
Speaker 5: it hit and it just broke and then it just
Speaker 5: went off to the races.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 8: So that look, we.
Speaker 5: Never and nobody predicted that, by the way, like not really.
Speaker 5: I mean the people, like in an abstract way, would
Speaker 5: say these are the prices, it'll reset it some time,
Speaker 5: But nobody's sitting there going, oh, and you know January
Speaker 5: of twenty twenty six.
Speaker 2: Nobody not well, you know, And that's the thing. Gerald
Speaker 2: Slinty always says this as well. And that's what I
Speaker 2: like about you and Gerald, you don't get don't let
Speaker 2: them put you in a box, because then they've got
Speaker 2: you boxed in and they're going to take you in
Speaker 2: a certain direction to a certain thing. But as Joe
Speaker 2: Clinty says, I'm just talking about trends. He goes, this
Speaker 2: is what I see happening. I don't like it, but
Speaker 2: I'm not going to deny the reality of it because
Speaker 2: I don't like it. And that's the key thing, you know,
Speaker 2: we look at this. I never had any love of
Speaker 2: gold or silver. I was never a coin collector or
Speaker 2: anything like that. But when you start seeing what is
Speaker 2: happening with the government and these other financial things, and
Speaker 2: you see all these scams on Wall Street, just one
Speaker 2: of them after the other, and huge scams where they
Speaker 2: lay these things out and work on them for decades
Speaker 2: and then you know, take everybody down. I just want
Speaker 2: to get away from these financialized sharks that are up
Speaker 2: on Wall Street, at Jeffrey Epstein's Island and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. I want to get away from
Speaker 2: these people. And that's why I look at something that
Speaker 2: I can physically hold and get away from these structures,
Speaker 2: get away from the banks as well.
Speaker 6: And so that's a key thing. I think.
Speaker 5: I'm with you one hundred percent, and obviously that's what
Speaker 5: I do. But I and I think it'll pay off
Speaker 5: and then law it's maybe not as exciting about some
Speaker 5: other things, but it's yours, you know. And yeah, there's
Speaker 5: somebody one of your listeners called me yesterday. I was
Speaker 5: on my way to to the refiner in Dallas and
Speaker 5: asked me about ninety percent US silver and it's like,
Speaker 5: why would somebody buy that right now? Well, for me,
Speaker 5: you're buying it a spot. I think it's one of
Speaker 5: the most underrated things because people got mad when they
Speaker 5: go to sell it. They're like, well, I'm not going
Speaker 5: to be getting anywhere near the melt value this silver.
Speaker 5: And I'm like, because everybody's trying to sell it once,
Speaker 5: if you would just stop doing that. If you hold on,
Speaker 5: it usually has a higher premium than everything else that
Speaker 5: there was one time, there was times we were we
Speaker 5: were able to we were seeing ten dollars disparities on
Speaker 5: price per fase dollar in normal markets, Like so if
Speaker 5: you had a fase dollars ten dimes four quarter are
Speaker 5: two half dollars. And I remember thinking, wow, that's just
Speaker 5: a crazy premium, because we would sell stuff way below
Speaker 5: the premium and I would see that all over you know,
Speaker 5: jaym Builliam and Atmes and other places, and so this
Speaker 5: this inversion that's happened where it's just so much hit
Speaker 5: the market and then people are mad. They're like, well
Speaker 5: that ninety percent didn't work out for me. It's because
Speaker 5: everybody is trying to sell it. If you just hold on,
Speaker 5: you'll actually have a better asset, And now's a great
Speaker 5: time to buy it, honestly, And that's what by the way,
Speaker 5: that's what I did so And because I know on
Speaker 5: the long enough timeline, you know that silver quarter or
Speaker 5: silver half dollar is going to go a long way,
Speaker 5: you know. So it's we're just pricing things in dollars.
Speaker 5: We're trained to do that. We grew up with it.
Speaker 2: That's the thing about zero. That's kind of their timeline.
Speaker 2: On long enough timeline, there is zero hedge. In other words,
Speaker 2: we're all dead right, which is coming from a site
Speaker 2: that's not known for its Christian perspective or anything.
Speaker 9: That's what you get some things. But it's a quote
Speaker 9: from the movie Fight Club. That's where they got. That's
Speaker 9: why the that's why the guy's name is Tyler Durden
Speaker 9: on zero hedge, because that's a quote. On a long
Speaker 9: enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Speaker 6: That's what they go off.
Speaker 5: It's based off actuary tables and insurance.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I never saw that movie. I guess I
Speaker 2: have to go back and see that movie. For the
Speaker 2: cultural references.
Speaker 5: I don't know if you'd like it.
Speaker 2: It's one of my Yeah, it didn't look like anything
Speaker 2: i'd want to see, but there's so many.
Speaker 5: Cultural references, David, but definitely one of my all time
Speaker 5: favorites from my youth. So it's a Generation X movie
Speaker 5: for sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, okay, I don't know. Did you ever see it, Travis?
Speaker 2: He's ninety, I said, yeah, so I guess I just
Speaker 2: get him to tell me about it. I spare myself
Speaker 2: the time.
Speaker 5: Just get the cliff notes from Travis. I don't think
Speaker 5: I just sit to summarize it for me.
Speaker 6: I let it hallucinate a little bit and make it
Speaker 6: more interesting.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, Tony. I got a quote here from
Speaker 2: guard Goldsmith from earlier when we were talking about bitcoin.
Speaker 2: He says, well, I know who invented gold and silver.
Speaker 2: He invented other elements as well. That's true, it's been forever.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely true. Well, thank you so much. And it
Speaker 2: is a crazy environment. I don't envy you at all,
Speaker 2: but hang in there. It's probably gonna keep up for
Speaker 2: quite a week, so you're gonna be able to give
Speaker 2: us all advice when the dollar steps into hyper inflation.
Speaker 2: You'll tell us a little bit about how you managed
Speaker 2: during the hyper inflation of.
Speaker 6: Silver and gold.
Speaker 5: Just get there.
Speaker 6: I just want to endure it. That's right.
Speaker 2: So you're learning, you're getting some valuable training from when
Speaker 2: we all go into the situation where you know, you
Speaker 2: go into the grocery store and all of a sudden
Speaker 2: that loaf of bread has gone up while you're in
Speaker 2: the store, and then it goes up before you get
Speaker 2: out of the store again.
Speaker 5: So I think it's closer than we think.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, Tony Again, Tony Rderman wise Wolf
Speaker 2: gold and silver, and a key thing like he's talking
Speaker 2: about there is the averaging of the costs of the
Speaker 2: dollar cost averaging by gradually accumulating things over period of time,
Speaker 2: making it a savings program. To start to get away
Speaker 2: from this corrupt system that we've got here, I try
Speaker 2: to get something that is going to be not as
Speaker 2: easily manipulated. They can manipulate it. But I think we're
Speaker 2: at the point right now where paper gold and silver
Speaker 2: is going to be exposed for the fraud that it is,
Speaker 2: for the derivative that it is. And I think that
Speaker 2: once that happens, that's going to take away some of
Speaker 2: their tools to manipulate gold and silver. I think that'll
Speaker 2: be a good thing. But anyway, why is Wolf gold
Speaker 2: and silver and you can get to them through David
Speaker 2: Knight dot Gold. Thank you, Tony, appreciate it. Have a
Speaker 2: good day. We'll be right back. Folks.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back. And I would like to ask
Speaker 2: for prayer for Jason Barker's grandson JJ. It was very
Speaker 2: sick right now, so please pray for JJ. And well
Speaker 2: I think he's had an issue once before that we
Speaker 2: had prayer for. But yeah, let's let's pray for JJ.
Speaker 2: God would heal him. And we're going to talk about
Speaker 2: what is behind so much of this Epstein stuff, Folks.
Speaker 2: When you look at it, it is an ancient evil
Speaker 2: that is there. But before we get into that, I
Speaker 2: want to talk about the great Taking. There's an excellent
Speaker 2: article by Alex Newman which was summarizing what David Webb
Speaker 2: has put together, and of course David Webb did a
Speaker 2: book about that. He's done an interview with him as well.
Speaker 2: Alex Newman writes WHIM the globalist World Economic Forum predicted
Speaker 2: in twenty fifteen, you'll own nothing and be happy. By
Speaker 2: twenty thirty, people world wide recoiled in horror of the thought,
Speaker 2: but almost nobody understood the mechanism by which it might
Speaker 2: take place. Now, thanks to brave whistleblowers and attorneys, the
Speaker 2: plan to seize virtually everything is plain to see. The
Speaker 2: real question at this point is can it be stopped?
Speaker 2: And you know it's interesting too, because we've had it
Speaker 2: didn't get a lot of publicity, but Elon Musk has
Speaker 2: talked about this many times as well. The world's richest man,
Speaker 2: the richest man in history, who is saying, well, yeah,
Speaker 2: money isn't going to mean anything, Well, why is he
Speaker 2: working so hard to accumulate more of it? And he's
Speaker 2: been talking about universal basic income. Basically, we don't own anything,
Speaker 2: we just get some kind of a stipend from the government.
Speaker 2: He's been one of the key pushers of that. If
Speaker 2: you remember when Andrew Yang ran for president back in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, that was his only issue that he was
Speaker 2: pushing was universal basic income and at that point in time,
Speaker 2: Elon Musk gave him over a million dollars. I think
Speaker 2: a million dollars is what he gave him, but he
Speaker 2: was anxious to push that issue, and that is really
Speaker 2: where he's coming from with his technocracy and his transhumanism
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff. But it is
Speaker 2: something that is much deeper than that. If the world
Speaker 2: economic forms, great Reset is the marketing campaign for global transformation,
Speaker 2: as they say, what retired investment banker David Webb calls
Speaker 2: the Great Taking is a legal and financial machinery designed
Speaker 2: to make the transformation unavoidable, ending private property rights and
Speaker 2: securities and stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments in order
Speaker 2: to allow megabanks allied with governments to take everything when
Speaker 2: the next crisis hits. In essence, you no longer own
Speaker 2: your securities. The deed has already been done. The stocks
Speaker 2: and bonds and your retirement and investment accounts may seem
Speaker 2: like they're yours, but thanks to little noticed changes in
Speaker 2: state law going back decades and then they prepare the
Speaker 2: stuff for decades, folks, they actually are not yours. And
Speaker 2: when a major economic financial calcitalism strikes, the deep state
Speaker 2: establishment and the governments and the megabanks that it control
Speaker 2: will take over everything from you. This is what we're
Speaker 2: talking about with the great taking. Imagine ownership and control
Speaker 2: of every publicly traded company in the hands of a
Speaker 2: tiny megalo maniacal elite. This is the plan, not just
Speaker 2: for the United States.
Speaker 5: But for the world.
Speaker 2: So David Webb blew the whistle on this scheme. For centuries,
Speaker 2: stocks and bonds were treated as personal property, which insulated
Speaker 2: the public from failures inside of the financial system. So
Speaker 2: for hundreds of years the securities were your property. If
Speaker 2: the banker or the custodian failed, that was their problem. Historically,
Speaker 2: the investor might simply tell those holding the securities, here's
Speaker 2: where you send my stuff, but that bulletproof protection is
Speaker 2: now gone. I would use the analogy of physical gold
Speaker 2: and silver that you have versus the paper gold and
Speaker 2: silver you're buying into. When you buy into that, you're
Speaker 2: not actually buying a tenth of announce for example, that's
Speaker 2: the increments in which they sell it. You're not buying
Speaker 2: a tenth of an ounce of gold or silver. What
Speaker 2: you're buying is shares and their venture, and if their
Speaker 2: venture goes down, you don't get your gold or silver
Speaker 2: out of that. And that's basically what they have done,
Speaker 2: and they've done it by going around state by state
Speaker 2: changing the UCC codes in a very surreptitious way. And
Speaker 2: if you remember, we caught onto that when they were
Speaker 2: trying to do it with CBDC. Remember they went around
Speaker 2: to several different states. The first people to blow the
Speaker 2: whistle on it were in South Dakota. Yeah, some legislators
Speaker 2: who are on top of that there, they said, they're
Speaker 2: trying to set this up so that cbdc's are going
Speaker 2: to be mandated as legal currency. Some people said stop,
Speaker 2: We're not going to let that happen. And then if
Speaker 2: you remember DeSantis, who for again he's got his faults
Speaker 2: for sure, he doesn't support free speech. He goes to
Speaker 2: Israel to sign a censorship bill in Israel, of all things.
Speaker 2: What is that about? Does he even care about the optics? However,
Speaker 2: he knew about CBDC and the people he and the
Speaker 2: Republicans in Florida did change the UCC and they explicitly
Speaker 2: excluded CBDC said it will not be used as legal tender.
Speaker 2: And so there's a lot that can be done there
Speaker 2: within the Universal Commercial Code, the UCC that defines how
Speaker 2: transactions are made, It fines how property transfers are done,
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff, So they can
Speaker 2: do a lot of stuff there that people don't really
Speaker 2: understand or see that's not visible. And that's been they've
Speaker 2: been doing this now for several decades quietly. So he said,
Speaker 2: when investors possessed now is not ownership but a legal abstraction.
Speaker 2: You no longer have a property right. You have what
Speaker 2: they have retermed as a security entitlement. Notice how similar
Speaker 2: this is to what happened to the real estate crash. Right,
Speaker 2: they would take the mortgages and essentially put them in
Speaker 2: a blender and grind them all up, and so you
Speaker 2: got this derived thing. That's why they call it a derivative.
Speaker 2: You got this derived value that was a cluster of mortgages.
Speaker 2: So when you invested in these real estate investments, you're
Speaker 2: not getting a particular mortgage. You're getting a little piece
Speaker 2: of this, one piece of that one. And it was indistinguishable.
Speaker 2: That's a big part of what the problem was. And
Speaker 2: so this is the same type of thing we're going
Speaker 2: to give you. You know, you're not going to get
Speaker 2: the stock or the bond or the financial instrument. We're
Speaker 2: going to give you something like a pointer to it. Right,
Speaker 2: And they can just remove that pointer that's what we
Speaker 2: talked about in programming. But after all, you can still
Speaker 2: call your broker, you can put a sell order in,
Speaker 2: and you can get your cash. But when a big
Speaker 2: crisis hits, and many experts and economists believe it could
Speaker 2: be just around the corner. Is it going to be
Speaker 2: AI crash, is going to be bitcoin? Is it going
Speaker 2: to be all the above? The significance of this change
Speaker 2: will be clear. The concept was first embedded into American
Speaker 2: law through amendments that were adopted across the states beginning
Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety four. And what was happening in nineteen
Speaker 2: ninety four. The Clinton administration was very busy changing the
Speaker 2: foundation of our financial system, very busy, and we've talked
Speaker 2: about this many times before with Jerald Slenty. The fact
Speaker 2: that banks were state chartered, they didn't have them operating
Speaker 2: in multiple states at the time, and the Clinton administration
Speaker 2: changed that. And at the same time, you had Bank
Speaker 2: of America, which was headquartered in California. It was a
Speaker 2: California bank, and they were operating within California and had
Speaker 2: Nations Bank, which was operating in North Carolina, and they
Speaker 2: wanted the two of them to merge, and so the
Speaker 2: combination of saying we can now have banks that can
Speaker 2: operate across state lines and not be combined just a state,
Speaker 2: and the fact that you had these two very large
Speaker 2: banks they were going to merge, and everybody said, you
Speaker 2: want to wind up with defensive mergers of all the
Speaker 2: bigger banks, and you're going to wind up with just
Speaker 2: a half dozen gigantic banks. And that's exactly what happened.
Speaker 2: Within about ten years, we had the two big to
Speaker 2: fail banks. And the real estate investment stuff, just like
Speaker 2: this is security entitlement, the derivatives, all that stuff came
Speaker 2: home to roost and the real estate crisis. But the
Speaker 2: security entitle thing that they set up in nineteen ninety
Speaker 2: four that has been propagating through one state after the other,
Speaker 2: and it was done in order to strip Americans of
Speaker 2: their property rights to their securities. A lot of people
Speaker 2: didn't notice the minor changes to commercial and contract law
Speaker 2: that were done to strip you of your title to
Speaker 2: the things that you actually own. This is the kind
Speaker 2: of stuff that you get from people like Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 2: and Larry Fink. If the intermediary fails, you have no
Speaker 2: right to take your property back, said David Webb attorney
Speaker 2: Don Grande, founder of True North Public Policy. While the
Speaker 2: principal leaders working with state legislators to reverse the change
Speaker 2: puts the mechanism in sharper legal terms, He said, the
Speaker 2: foundation of the plan that he says, is state law,
Speaker 2: specifically the UCC Code. And this again, like I said,
Speaker 2: this is where they tried to sneak in the CBDC.
Speaker 2: And I think it's also interesting to just how important
Speaker 2: it is to get these things done and you can't
Speaker 2: get the This is why we have a little bit
Speaker 2: of hope to fix this, a little bit of hope
Speaker 2: because it's at the state level and you can find
Speaker 2: some good state legislators. We had one with Frank Nicely,
Speaker 2: Unfortunately he's gone, but there's a couple others like that
Speaker 2: here in Tennessee, and there are some in some other
Speaker 2: states as well. What the difficulty is is that within
Speaker 2: the broader context, once the system realizes what one of
Speaker 2: these legislators are going to do, they isolate them. They
Speaker 2: send their bills to committee and kill the bills. And
Speaker 2: so it's not easy even if you've got good people
Speaker 2: in place. But it's not impossible as if it were
Speaker 2: in Washington. If this is coming directly from Washington, but
Speaker 2: they've gone in at each and every state level, which
Speaker 2: still gives us something of a theoretical opportunity. Here you
Speaker 2: see see Article eight is written to sound like ownership
Speaker 2: remains intact, but it contains there's two exceptions. They give
Speaker 2: banks priority in the event of insolvency of a broker
Speaker 2: or a custodian in a crisis. These exceptions control the outcomes.
Speaker 2: The schemes have already been tested in court as well.
Speaker 2: An individual bias a stock through a broker, believes that
Speaker 2: he owns it, but instead of the genuine ownership, what
Speaker 2: they get is a security entitlement, the legal term now
Speaker 2: embedded into state law. That security entitlement entitles one to
Speaker 2: control over the security until you don't have it anymore.
Speaker 2: The broker routes custody upward through lawyers, I'm sorry, layers
Speaker 2: layers of lawyers, through layers, until the asset sits at
Speaker 2: the apex of the system with a shadowy outfit called
Speaker 2: the Depository Trust Company and it's designated agents the DTC.
Speaker 2: If a broker, custodian or clearing structure fails, priority now shifts.
Speaker 2: The first exception gives banks that lend to brokers or
Speaker 2: custodians priority over the investor. The second gives lenders to
Speaker 2: clearing corporations priority over the investor in the event of insolvency.
Speaker 2: And folks, if you've got a big crisis, you don't
Speaker 2: need to be too far down on the list of
Speaker 2: on the priority list of creditors to not get anything
Speaker 2: at all. That's the way this is going to operate,
Speaker 2: especially when the creditors head of you are crooks, as
Speaker 2: these guys are like a big deal as long as
Speaker 2: the economy is dealing doesn't seem like it right, but
Speaker 2: routine market gains and losses, and you can buy and sell.
Speaker 2: But in the event of a systemic failure and a
Speaker 2: cascade of insolvencies, and we're looking at a lot of
Speaker 2: different things that can cause that to happen, the AI bubble,
Speaker 2: the bitcoin bubble, a lot of different things like that.
Speaker 2: And these people who are invested in these things, many
Speaker 2: of them have done it on large margin calls as well.
Speaker 2: So those seemingly obscure rules governing legal priority would be
Speaker 2: triggered and saving the government backed megabanks will be the priority,
Speaker 2: and it'll take priority over your retirement. David web summarizes
Speaker 2: the reality bluntly. He says, the investor is always vulnerable
Speaker 2: to the insolvency of the intermediary and has no rights
Speaker 2: to take back their property. You talk about counterparty risk,
Speaker 2: this is counterparty risk on steroids, folks. The beneficiaries are predictable,
Speaker 2: the deep state moneymen, the banks that own the depository
Speaker 2: trust company. Those banks are JP Morgan Chase, and all
Speaker 2: of the two big to fail banks that were created
Speaker 2: by the regulatory changes that the Clinton pushed through and
Speaker 2: by allowing these mergers. They're the ones who created this.
Speaker 2: It goes back to the middle nineteen nineties. They're the
Speaker 2: ones who are going to be able to suck up
Speaker 2: all of the securities the individuals when the next crisis hits.
Speaker 2: The public has left with claims on leftovers if anything remains.
Speaker 2: To cut through the complex legal and financial jargon, South
Speaker 2: Dakota Representative Julie Ach, the first lawmaker to file a
Speaker 2: bill to fix this situation in any state, offered an analogy.
Speaker 2: She said, imagine you take your car to a mechanic.
Speaker 2: The mechanic secretly uses your car as collateral. The mechanic
Speaker 2: goes broke, and creditors sees what you thought was your car.
Speaker 2: I'll give you another example, because what we're talking about
Speaker 2: here is bankruptcy law, and we're talking about the priority
Speaker 2: of creditors. And we were a creditor when the person
Speaker 2: that we sold our business to went bankrupt, and so
Speaker 2: we know something about this firsthand. And one the analogy
Speaker 2: is one of the cautionary tales that was told to us.
Speaker 2: It wasn't an analogy, it actually happened. You had a
Speaker 2: situation where you had a home builder who was suffering
Speaker 2: financial difficulty and he started taking advanced payments, you know,
Speaker 2: and draws and stuff like that from various homeowners. And
Speaker 2: one homeowner was into it twenty thousand dollars with this guy,
Speaker 2: and he went bankrupt and he gave him the money back.
Speaker 2: The builder did and said, I can't do your home.
Speaker 2: It was just kind of retainer that he had, so
Speaker 2: they can't do your home. Here's your you know, the
Speaker 2: money that you gave me to get started. I haven't
Speaker 2: done anything with it, so here's the money back. Well,
Speaker 2: the bankruptcy trustee went back and took that money back
Speaker 2: from the person because they said, well that belonged to
Speaker 2: the business, and he couldn't redistribute it. So that's the
Speaker 2: reality that you're looking at here. Just like you take
Speaker 2: your car to the mechanic and the car is sitting
Speaker 2: there at the mechanics, and the auto mechanic goes bankrupt
Speaker 2: and the bankruptcy trustee comes in and takes your car
Speaker 2: because it was just there to get fixed. He says,
Speaker 2: this analogy fits, but the reality is even worse because
Speaker 2: it is global and because it is hidden. It is
Speaker 2: a pawn operation that you never agreed to enter. Your
Speaker 2: property is being pawned. Think of it that way. You
Speaker 2: haven't given permission. Somebody else is taking your property and
Speaker 2: pawning it. And that's really what is happening. So these
Speaker 2: crooked financial schemers are doing securitize. It's just like security
Speaker 2: is mortgage fraud. The great taking is not merely financial,
Speaker 2: but it is political. This is not just about your ira.
Speaker 2: This is about subjugation. It is a geopolitical strategy, essentially
Speaker 2: a hybrid war. The objective is not that the cartel
Speaker 2: needs your savings. They've already got all the money in
Speaker 2: the world for the most part. Right, It's that you
Speaker 2: can't be allowed to have it. Because that gives you
Speaker 2: some means of independence. And let me just say, if
Speaker 2: you go back to the creation of the Federal Reserve
Speaker 2: and the income tax, which happened at the same time,
Speaker 2: was that not the purpose of that as well? They
Speaker 2: have been laying out this kind of strategy for over
Speaker 2: him undred years. We don't need an income tax to
Speaker 2: fund the government. The government, and I've got forty trillion dollars,
Speaker 2: I've got forty trillion reasons to show you that the
Speaker 2: income tax is not necessary to what they do. They
Speaker 2: create money out of thin air. They have no intention
Speaker 2: of ever paying it back, They have no ability to
Speaker 2: ever pay that back. And so what is the purpose
Speaker 2: of the income tax? And why do they fight so
Speaker 2: hard against any kind of income tax reduction or elimination
Speaker 2: of the income tax. It's because they don't want you
Speaker 2: to have the money. You have the federal government that
Speaker 2: can just manufacture fiat currency out of thin air with
Speaker 2: no consequences. So why do they need our money. They don't.
Speaker 2: They just need to have you poor so that you
Speaker 2: are dependent on them, so that you can be controlled
Speaker 2: by them. That's exactly what he's talking about here.
Speaker 6: He said.
Speaker 2: The reasons for this are geopolitical more than financial. These
Speaker 2: banks have so much money they couldn't spend it if
Speaker 2: they live for a thousand years. Same thing with people
Speaker 2: like Elon Musk. But they want to make sure that
Speaker 2: you don't have it. They don't need your four o
Speaker 2: one K or your Ira, They just don't want you
Speaker 2: to have it. They want to take property so that
Speaker 2: we are essentially slaves, strip the middle class of savings
Speaker 2: in collateral, and the solution becomes irresistible. David Webb names
Speaker 2: the endpoint too. He said it's going to be something
Speaker 2: like central bank digital currency and total control. And again
Speaker 2: we think that we've stopped central bank digital currency here
Speaker 2: in America. No, no, Trump is just doing it more
Speaker 2: surreptitiously and deviously with Larry Lutnik and the stable coin things.
Speaker 2: That's where they're going to go to. And they have
Speaker 2: made sure that for these stable coin guys to be
Speaker 2: able to play, they have to have all the features
Speaker 2: that are going to allow them to freeze and seize
Speaker 2: your money and the stable coins. So he says everything
Speaker 2: is under control to avoid a bigger economic crisis. Banks
Speaker 2: will be on holiday for a while, is what they're
Speaker 2: going to say. But now you can download an app
Speaker 2: and you'll have some CBDC currency or some stable coins
Speaker 2: on it, so you can continue shopping for needed essentials.
Speaker 2: Trust the government. Everything will be fine, and then they'll
Speaker 2: start with the stimulus check type of stuff like Trump did.
Speaker 2: By the time the dust settles, all securities will be
Speaker 2: seized in order to prop up the system. The reaction
Speaker 2: when lawmakers attempt to restore basic property rights exposes the stakes.
Speaker 2: This legislator, the person who is trying to organize the
Speaker 2: state by state overturning of this in the UCC's name
Speaker 2: is Grande, describes what he says the legislators face when
Speaker 2: they try to do this. He said, they face something
Speaker 2: that's like the twin Towers of Mordor, the Bank lobby
Speaker 2: and the Uniform Law Commission. Both of these outfits have
Speaker 2: dismissed concerns publicly while exerting pressure privately. Committee rooms filled
Speaker 2: with lobbyists, vague warnings of negative consequences appear, specifics evaporate
Speaker 2: when challenged. In an interview with Representative ok, the one
Speaker 2: who was the first one to offer a bill to
Speaker 2: stop this and to overturn this in South Dakota, the
Speaker 2: New American she described how she had an interview with
Speaker 2: The New American with Alex Newman. She described how her bill,
Speaker 2: crafted to protect investors' property rights from the Great Taking,
Speaker 2: was deliberately sent to a committee to die. After educating
Speaker 2: colleagues on the mechanics of the scheme and finding broad support,
Speaker 2: she said, powerful forces work behind the scenes to halt
Speaker 2: the effort. And of course you see this happening in
Speaker 2: many state legislatures, probably all of them to a large degree,
Speaker 2: the same way that you see Mike Johnson and the
Speaker 2: concentrated control in Congress as to what even gets to
Speaker 2: be voted on. They can make sure it never gets
Speaker 2: to the floor. The pattern matched Web and Grande shared
Speaker 2: with this writer with Alex Newman. When the merits could
Speaker 2: not be defeated, procedure and pressure were used to kill
Speaker 2: reform quick quietly. Multiple lawmakers across multiple states have described
Speaker 2: similar scenarios in their own states as they sought to
Speaker 2: restore property ownership over securities. That response should tell Americans
Speaker 2: everything they need to know. Legitimate constitutional systems, statutes, and
Speaker 2: structures do not require silence, threats or procedural burial to
Speaker 2: survive schemes built for looting and subjugating the public due
Speaker 2: the incentives are now in place and very easy to see.
Speaker 2: For the global banking elites, crashing the system and seizing
Speaker 2: everything is now in their own best interest, especially as
Speaker 2: the instability of the federal reserves FIAT monetary system grows.
Speaker 2: So the objective is plainly neo feudalism updated for the
Speaker 2: digital age. Not the abolition of ownership by decree, but
Speaker 2: the conversion of ownership into a conditional entitlement quote unquote
Speaker 2: that is revocable when the oligarchy decides that the system
Speaker 2: quote needs what is yours. You will own nothing if
Speaker 2: these diabolical economic traps are not exposed and stopped at
Speaker 2: the state level. That's why you need to pay attention
Speaker 2: to your state politics and not be so obsessed with
Speaker 2: national politics, especially with one politician who shall be nameless,
Speaker 2: but we don't know who he is. Gold and silver again,
Speaker 2: when you look at the recovery, it didn't take very
Speaker 2: long for it to start to come back up. But
Speaker 2: there was an interview on Kitko with a guy whose
Speaker 2: name is Guistra, and he was talking about what happened
Speaker 2: with the twenty percent drop that happened over the weekend
Speaker 2: in gold and other things. He said, the metal complex
Speaker 2: didn't just see a correction, It was a liquidity event.
Speaker 2: He said, it happened on a Friday. Asia was closed
Speaker 2: and so there was no support. It was a Friday afternoon,
Speaker 2: and whoever had short positions on silver especially I'm sure
Speaker 2: participated in that downward take position. In my opinion, it
Speaker 2: was a takedown. The sell off was exacerbated by a
Speaker 2: swift tightening of trading conditions following the historical the historic volatility,
Speaker 2: the CME Group raised margin requirements on gold and silver futures,
Speaker 2: effective February two, Monday, and forcing leveraged traders to post
Speaker 2: significantly more collateral. Maintenance Margins for speculative goal positions jumped
Speaker 2: to eight percent from six percent, while silver margins saw
Speaker 2: a steeper height to fifteen percent from eleven percent. So
Speaker 2: again there down on this they were worried that people
Speaker 2: buying too much stuff on margin, and they're still heavily
Speaker 2: marginalized if you look at that. For decades, the price
Speaker 2: of gold has been largely determined by futures contracts and
Speaker 2: derivatives by the paper market. He argues that that era
Speaker 2: is now ending as a pricing power shift to Eastern
Speaker 2: exchanges that require physical delivery. For the past forty almost
Speaker 2: fifty years, the paper market has controlled the gold price.
Speaker 2: They've been able to manipulate it. And that was the
Speaker 2: first thing that gave me a clue. I didn't really
Speaker 2: understand what was going on, and I evenly thought I
Speaker 2: was buying a tenth of an ounce of gold or
Speaker 2: silver when I bought into those and I noticed that
Speaker 2: the price was not changing along with gold and silver.
Speaker 2: So I thought, what's going on with this? And then
Speaker 2: I realized that you're not actually buying gold and silver,
Speaker 2: and it's actually coming out of Shanghai, and it's like,
Speaker 2: I don't want my money Shang hid, so I got
Speaker 2: out of those things. He issued a blunt warning to
Speaker 2: are relying on these ETFs rather than on bullyon. He said,
Speaker 2: in a crisis, you better own physical gold. Paper gold
Speaker 2: won't cut it. If you don't own physical gold, you
Speaker 2: don't own gold. As I said before, it's a game
Speaker 2: of musical chairs, and these chairs that the Wall Street
Speaker 2: Sharks and others have done are just virtual. They're not real,
Speaker 2: you know. So you might have that headset on, that
Speaker 2: virtual reality headset and it might look like everything around
Speaker 2: you is real. It might look like there's a chair
Speaker 2: behind you and you go to set down on it,
Speaker 2: it's not there. That's the virtual reality that they've created
Speaker 2: it for everybody, and they have surreptitiously removed real reality
Speaker 2: and put in this virtual reality for people in terms
Speaker 2: of the changing of the UCC code. We're taking quick break, folks,
Speaker 2: and when we come back, I want to talk about
Speaker 2: what is really the most important thing about the revels
Speaker 2: of the Jeffrey Epstein stuff. Yes, we have seen how
Speaker 2: the people who control basically who control our world, the
Speaker 2: powers that be who are controlling our world in terms
Speaker 2: of humans, we have seen how unbelievably disgusting and corrupt
Speaker 2: they are. We've seen what vile, evil people they are.
Speaker 2: We've seen how they conspire together. But there's something else
Speaker 2: to see, and we'll talk about that when we come back.
Speaker 6: He is a Little's all I ought.
Speaker 4: You might want to hear it in your own You
Speaker 4: own nothing, and be happy, I got no cash, ain't
Speaker 4: got no car, not twenty four booster shots. In your
Speaker 4: own nothing.
Speaker 10: Be happy you can't even buy inns and store because
Speaker 10: of your low social credit score.
Speaker 4: Oh nothing, be happy.
Speaker 6: You would owe nothing.
Speaker 4: And be happy, be happy at ease or bugs.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, ratisbro come in and thank you
Speaker 2: for the tip. I appreciate that. He said, like the
Speaker 2: home loan scam, Foreigners get a home on average in
Speaker 2: three years, while natural born Americans can go thirty years
Speaker 2: with no home, no house.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 2: They decide who they're going to reward, who they're going
Speaker 2: to punish, another aspect of the incentivization of the great replacement.
Speaker 2: But we're talking about the great taking as well. Let's
Speaker 2: look at this. This is an excellent op ed piece
Speaker 2: I think from JD. Holl And, who I saw this.
Speaker 2: I thought, you know, I really haven't talked about it
Speaker 2: in this perspective, but I really should. It is the
Speaker 2: Christian response to documented evil, and that's really what we're
Speaker 2: looking at with the Epstein files. Again, this is JD.
Speaker 6: Hall.
Speaker 2: He has a substack that is insight, sight, insight, to
Speaker 2: to insight, I n c E.
Speaker 6: He said.
Speaker 2: The Epstein files don't just document crimes, they document a religion.
Speaker 2: Do you understand that it's got its own little temple there,
Speaker 2: It's got its own occultic symbols that are there. It's
Speaker 2: got the same kinds of rituals that we've seen throughout
Speaker 2: civilization history. All civilizations have had this type of stuff
Speaker 2: that we see with the Epstein elite. They've all done that,
Speaker 2: and they've all done it with their leadership. So, he said,
Speaker 2: documents our religion three and a half million pages, prove,
Speaker 2: but the secular world can't and won't name, and the
Speaker 2: church won't acknowledge. For the most part, organized demon worship
Speaker 2: operating in the highest levels of the global power temple
Speaker 2: structures with Babylonian symbols, allegations of ritualistic sacrifice, a transhumanist
Speaker 2: breeding program to create superior humans, FBI memos claiming Masad
Speaker 2: blackmail operations, victims treated as goyam cattle for the offering,
Speaker 2: and through it all, the deafening silence of American evangelism,
Speaker 2: where the powerful serve ancient gods through modern mechanisms, when
Speaker 2: intelligence agencies protect the operation, When your theology won't let
Speaker 2: you investigate because of which nation might be implicated, you
Speaker 2: don't have discernment. You have idolatry, he said. The media
Speaker 2: will tell you that the Epstein files document child trafficking.
Speaker 2: They're wrong, but they're not wrong rather, but they're not
Speaker 2: right either. That's an incomplete take on all of this.
Speaker 2: What other three and a half million pages actually document.
Speaker 2: It's something that is far older, far darker than a
Speaker 2: criminal enterprise. They document organized worship, not the worship of
Speaker 2: a person or even of an ideology, but the worship
Speaker 2: of depravity itself. The secular world has no category for
Speaker 2: this because they spent centuries pretending that the spiritual realm
Speaker 2: doesn't exist. Well, fine, they're fair enough. They're Pagans. They're
Speaker 2: operating on pagan assumption. So when they see ritualistic abuse
Speaker 2: and temple structures that are adorned with ancient symbols, they
Speaker 2: just shrug and call it eccentric billionaire behavior. You can't
Speaker 2: blame a blind man for not seeing. But Christians don't
Speaker 2: have an excuse for this. We claim to believe in
Speaker 2: principalities and powers. We claim to believe in spiritual warfare.
Speaker 2: We claim to believe that demons are real, active and strategic.
Speaker 2: So when three and a half million pages land on
Speaker 2: our lapse documenting systematic evil among the global elite, complete
Speaker 2: with temple structures, occult symbols, and allegations of ritual sacrifice,
Speaker 2: and also a transhumanist breeding program. That is about the
Speaker 2: revelations about the ranch that he had in New Mexico,
Speaker 2: the Zorro ranch. And you've had a couple of individuals
Speaker 2: who say they were held captive and used for a
Speaker 2: breeding program, and they would take the babies away, and
Speaker 2: who knows what they would do with the babies. So anyway,
Speaker 2: he says it should be and of course the Christian
Speaker 2: response should be of courses is happening. Of course evil
Speaker 2: is going to concentrate at the top. Of course the
Speaker 2: old gods are still being worshiped. Well, the Epstein files
Speaker 2: aren't revealing anything new about the nature of evil. They're
Speaker 2: just proving what scriptures already told us. The powers of
Speaker 2: darkness concentrate in high places with false religions, They demand
Speaker 2: blood sacrifice, and those who try to become gods always
Speaker 2: target the image of God and the most defenseless. So
Speaker 2: let's talk about what the Christian response should be now,
Speaker 2: the response that we're getting from big evangelism and what
Speaker 2: he means by that, or the people who are the
Speaker 2: ones who have access to the media that everybody looks
Speaker 2: up to and respects and follows. They hang on the
Speaker 2: words that they say in terms of you know, big
Speaker 2: Christian radio and the ones who have Christian institutions and
Speaker 2: things like that. These are the guys who, for the
Speaker 2: most part during the COVID that you could see where
Speaker 2: they were, which side they were on. He said, there's
Speaker 2: been radio silence punctuated by nervous coughing, but the response
Speaker 2: that we should be giving if we actually believed in
Speaker 2: our own theology is not heard. So he says, a
Speaker 2: concentration of extreme evil among the global elite isn't merely
Speaker 2: a function of opportunity. It is a function of spiritual reality.
Speaker 2: They distribute themselves. Demons don't distribute themselves democratically across the
Speaker 2: human population, like some kind of a hellis Hellish census. Rather,
Speaker 2: they are strategic in what they do. They concentrate where
Speaker 2: earthly power concentrates, because they want to rule the world
Speaker 2: through those who already do. And I think they also
Speaker 2: will reward those who will do what they want to
Speaker 2: be done. They will reward them with power, just as
Speaker 2: we saw with the Temptation of Christ. Satan said to you,
Speaker 2: see all these kingdoms, I'll give you all of that
Speaker 2: if you bow down and worship me. And that's how
Speaker 2: we get the Epsteins of the world, and the Gates
Speaker 2: of the world, and the Trumps of this world. This
Speaker 2: is why Epstein's network included royalty presidents, prime ministers, intelligence opportunities,
Speaker 2: tech titans, scientific elite, and Harvard professors. The pattern is
Speaker 2: not random. Demons don't waste their time possessing homeless people
Speaker 2: in des moin no offense to des Moines, but the
Speaker 2: principalities have bigger fish to fry. They target those who
Speaker 2: can shape nations, who can move markets, who can influence
Speaker 2: millions and protect each other from prosecution. And what happened
Speaker 2: on Epstein Island wasn't happening despite these people's power. It
Speaker 2: was happening because of their power. The principalities demanding tribute,
Speaker 2: and tribute was paid and children systematically for decades, with
Speaker 2: cameras rolling for blackmail leverage. Evil is strategic, it is
Speaker 2: not a galitarian, and the Epstein files document the strategy
Speaker 2: in exhausting detail. That blue striped temple on Little Saint
Speaker 2: James wasn't decorative. Multiple victims described it in testimony. FBI
Speaker 2: documents reference occult ritualistic elements happening in it, and beneath it.
Speaker 2: The secular media treats this like a billionaire's centric architectural
Speaker 2: taste like Epstein really just vibed with ancient Mediterranean esthetics.
Speaker 2: The temple architecture echoes Babylonian zuggrats, stepped pyramids dedicated to
Speaker 2: gods like Marduk and Ishtar, not metaphorical gods, not symbols
Speaker 2: of human psychological projection, but actual principalities the scripture identifies
Speaker 2: as demons masquerading as deities. The symbols matter owls connected
Speaker 2: to lilith and Babylonian demonology, sun dials indicating celestial worship,
Speaker 2: zodiac markings documented in FBI photos from inside the structure.
Speaker 2: These are not random rich guy quirks. They are religious icons,
Speaker 2: and the gods themselves have a pattern, very specific, very
Speaker 2: dark pattern. Ishtar, the goddess of sex, war and fertility,
Speaker 2: whose temple rule featured quad isht grid prostitutes whose rituals
Speaker 2: involved coercion and exploitation, or lamas shoot to a demoness
Speaker 2: who prayed specifically on children and infants, described an ancient
Speaker 2: text as snatching babies from moms and nursing them with poison. Malik,
Speaker 2: who demanded child sacrifice. And of course this is a
Speaker 2: big thing with Israel, the surrounding nations that were there.
Speaker 2: Once they went in the Canaanites, they got drawn into that.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact. It was something that was
Speaker 2: a fact that went down into Carthage as well, and
Speaker 2: God eventually took revenge on Carthage. They had tremendous archaeological
Speaker 2: evidence of tremendous amounts of child sacrifice on the altars
Speaker 2: that were there at Carthage. And so this is something
Speaker 2: that has been well documented, and one day somebody will say,
Speaker 2: in one more thing, Carthage must be destroyed. That's what happens.
Speaker 2: God can also work through rulers. So Malik demanded child sacrifice.
Speaker 6: Now look at the.
Speaker 2: Epstein files actually allege children kept in stalls so that
Speaker 2: men could look at them like livestock offerings, ritualistic abuse,
Speaker 2: and temple like structures, echoing sacred prostitution, allegations of infant
Speaker 2: sacrifice and dismemberment, malic worship updated for the twenty first century.
Speaker 2: Systematic torture documented in emails In one video, I love
Speaker 2: the torture straight out of Nirgol's playbook. This isn't coincidence.
Speaker 2: It's not coherence. The acts match the ancient cultic practices
Speaker 2: of the very gods whose symbols adorned Epstein's properties. Scripture
Speaker 2: tells us that when people sacrifice to gods other than Yahweh,
Speaker 2: they are sacrificing to demons. The old gods of Mesopotamia
Speaker 2: didn't die, they didn't retire to some demonic Florida to
Speaker 2: spend their day playing shuffle board. They're still receiving worship.
Speaker 2: They are still just outsourced to billionaires with private islands
Speaker 2: instead of to priests with temple complexes. Some principalities, same principalities,
Speaker 2: brother and different property values. Call it what it is,
Speaker 2: demon worship. Industrial scale demon worship with governmental protection intelligence
Speaker 2: agencies were involved, the powers of darkness operating through the
Speaker 2: powers that be. So Epstein's religion had a second component
Speaker 2: beyond the ancient gods, being a devotee of transhumanism, the
Speaker 2: belief that technology can elevate humanity beyond our God designed limitations.
Speaker 6: And I've said this.
Speaker 2: About transhumanism from the very beginning. It's based on the
Speaker 2: oldest lie that Eve bought into You will become like
Speaker 2: God and you will live forever that's what these people believe.
Speaker 2: They literally believe they're going to become like God. They
Speaker 2: literally believe that they are creating gods that they call
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence, and they really do think that they're going
Speaker 2: to be able to use cryrogenetic things or something like
Speaker 2: that to live forever. And that's some of the stuff
Speaker 2: that came out and the Epstein files as well, things
Speaker 2: that he was working on. Genesis three, the original lie
Speaker 2: you can transcend your created nature and become divine. This
Speaker 2: is really, as he points out, you look at the
Speaker 2: Tower of Babble, and this has basically been recreated in
Speaker 2: terms of the Internet, in terms of technology, humanity has
Speaker 2: come together to be able to do pretty much anything.
Speaker 2: Epstein was involved in eugenics as well as bitcoin and
Speaker 2: finances and all these other things as well, so he
Speaker 2: was also funding that type of thing. The media portrays
Speaker 2: this as an eccentric billionaire fantasy, as if Epstein was
Speaker 2: just some rich guy playing out science fiction scenarios because
Speaker 2: he could afford the props. Christians, however, should recognize what
Speaker 2: this actually is. It's an attempt to overthrow God's created order.
Speaker 2: Plans to impregnate up to twenty women simultaneously at the
Speaker 2: Zoro Ranch in New Mexico. An obsession was seeding his
Speaker 2: genetics across the population because he believed that his DNA
Speaker 2: was superior, surrounding himself with geneticists, AI researchers, evolutionary biologists,
Speaker 2: creating his own priestly caste of techno wizards. And I
Speaker 2: would say, when you look at Gates program again, it's
Speaker 2: the utter contempt for everybody else. You know, it's not
Speaker 2: only the fact that his genetics are superior and he
Speaker 2: needs to spread them as far and as wide as
Speaker 2: he can, so he's going to get a bunch of
Speaker 2: women to get them all pregnant. At the same time,
Speaker 2: it's also about the masses of people out there that
Speaker 2: they perceive as a threat, but as the demons behind
Speaker 2: them want to kill humanity, but it is a threat
Speaker 2: to these guys, and so they want to eliminate the
Speaker 2: total number of people, reduce it. That's why you see
Speaker 2: all these things also tied into population reduction and all
Speaker 2: the lies about environmentalism, which is really nothing other than
Speaker 2: guy or worship. They even called it the guy a
Speaker 2: project for quite some time. This is this pagan idea
Speaker 2: that the earth is actually this sentient being and that
Speaker 2: type of thing. Humans are virus, so we have to
Speaker 2: be eliminated. And so he and people like Bill Gates
Speaker 2: have been working on killing the rest of us while
Speaker 2: they propagate themselves. So thirty million dollars was given to
Speaker 2: Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics by Jeffrey Epstein, funding for OpenCog,
Speaker 2: which is an artificial general intelligence research and chronic plans
Speaker 2: to preserve his head and genitals for future revival, because
Speaker 2: apparently immortality requires specific anatomical priorities. I guess that's really
Speaker 2: the only two things he really cares about is his
Speaker 2: head and his genitals. But Epstein wasn't just trafficking children
Speaker 2: for sexual gratification, though that happened and that was monstrous.
Speaker 2: He was trafficking them for breeding a program that he
Speaker 2: designed to create a superior race that was seated by
Speaker 2: his genetics. This is eugenics, This is nephelim logic. This
Speaker 2: is Babel. And here's the thing about Babel that makes
Speaker 2: it relevant. God was not scared of humanity because their
Speaker 2: tower was tall. He scattered them because, as he said,
Speaker 2: nothing they proposed to do will now be impossible for them.
Speaker 2: The tower was dangerous not because of its hyph but
Speaker 2: because of what unified humanity pursuing godhood could accomplish. So
Speaker 2: that's really what we're seeing with all this stuff, you know,
Speaker 2: the now that humanity has been unified, I mean we
Speaker 2: have a English has now become kind of the common language.
Speaker 2: Most people in tech fields can either if they can't
Speaker 2: speak it, they can read it and understand it. And
Speaker 2: of course tech has got its own language in many regards.
Speaker 2: It says Epstein's network represents the same threat, just reassembled
Speaker 2: with modern components. Global reach spanning multiple continents, unified purpose,
Speaker 2: the elite protecting each other through blackmail and institutional capture,
Speaker 2: technological capability including AI, genetic engineering, cryonics, surveillance systems, governmental
Speaker 2: protection through intelligence agencies, and legal immunity. One language unites
Speaker 2: them all wealth the babble reassembled, being rebuilt. The secular
Speaker 2: media will never frame it this way because they think
Speaker 2: transhumanism is just futurism. It's just optimistic nerds dreaming about
Speaker 2: living forever and merging with the machines. Scripture literate Christians
Speaker 2: should recognize the pattern immediately. Every attempt to transcend God
Speaker 2: designed humanity, whether through eating forbidden fruit or meeting with demons,
Speaker 2: or building towers or breeding superior genetics ends the same
Speaker 2: way God comes down and destroys it, not because he's threatened,
Speaker 2: but because humans don't get to become gods, no matter
Speaker 2: how many scientists they hire or how many children they
Speaker 2: sacrifice to the project. So what should the Christian response
Speaker 2: be to this documenting evil at the highest level of
Speaker 2: global power, complete with temple worship, demon god symbolism, and
Speaker 2: ritualistic abuse and a transhumanist breeding program. Well here's what
Speaker 2: the big evangelicals have offered so far. Silence, not thoughtful silence,
Speaker 2: not strategic silence, not as if we're investigating this before
Speaker 2: we speak. Silence, just silence, the kind of silence that
Speaker 2: happens when institutions realize that speaking would cost them something
Speaker 2: that they're not willing to pay.
Speaker 6: And it's been a real.
Speaker 2: It's been a real problem for me to see how
Speaker 2: these Christian publications and news sites are so exclusively focused
Speaker 2: on the Face Act. We need to use the Face
Speaker 2: Act against Don Lemon. That's why I read that op
Speaker 2: ed piece from Mett Trouhala, because he said, you know,
Speaker 2: they have made this deal with the devil. We'll keep
Speaker 2: quiet at abortion centers, and we won't do prayer, we
Speaker 2: won't talk to people as are going in the abortion clinics.
Speaker 2: We'll just let them go ahead and kill their babies
Speaker 2: as long as because the other side of the Face Act,
Speaker 2: which I never really understood before this happened with Don Lemon,
Speaker 2: the other side of that act was to say, and
Speaker 2: we will keep them out of your church services. I
Speaker 2: looked at that deal with the devil life. How bad
Speaker 2: is that? You know, we're going to let people murder
Speaker 2: and rip babies apart and not say anything to them
Speaker 2: as long as they don't come in and say anything
Speaker 2: at our church services. So what are your church services for?
Speaker 2: What are you really worshiping? Are you worshiping success and
Speaker 2: wealth like everybody else? And that's what I see over
Speaker 2: and over again. This is the deal with the Devil
Speaker 2: that they made at the very beginning. This was always
Speaker 2: sold and it was actually in the title protecting access
Speaker 2: to the clinics and that type of thing, but it
Speaker 2: was also to keep people out of churches, to make
Speaker 2: sure they didn't bother them and get in the way.
Speaker 2: And so the Gospel Coalition has not issued a statement.
Speaker 2: He said, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission is apparently
Speaker 2: busy with other priorities. The Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee
Speaker 2: has better things to do. The PCA Journal Assembly must
Speaker 2: have missed the memo. The same institutions that produce white
Speaker 2: papers on critical race theory, lengthy responses to pronoun debates,
Speaker 2: coordinated campaigns against Disney movies, and emergency statements when a
Speaker 2: Christian celebrity says something vaguely troubling about Hell, that's their priorities.
Speaker 2: And of course it's not to say that we shouldn't
Speaker 2: talk about those things, but that's all they talk about.
Speaker 2: Three and a half million pages documenting industrial scale child
Speaker 2: trafficking by global elites, complete with governmental protection, intelligence agency involvement,
Speaker 2: and allegations of ritual sacrifice and a eugenics breeding program.
Speaker 2: And apparently that is not something that the big institutional
Speaker 2: Christians want to comment on. Speaking costs something, It costs access.
Speaker 2: And this is what we've seen from people like Franklin Graham,
Speaker 2: people like Robert Jeffries. You know Robert Jeffries, who's as
Speaker 2: stuff is happening this week. I couldn't believe that you
Speaker 2: got people like Robert Jeffries and some people that we
Speaker 2: know from a church that we attended in Texas say well,
Speaker 2: talking about how they went to see Millennia. It's like,
Speaker 2: do you realize how evil the Trump people are? Do
Speaker 2: you realize how they're connected to all of this? These
Speaker 2: people are connected with everything I've just been describing here,
Speaker 2: and you're going to go watch this ego trip, this Paola,
Speaker 2: from Jeff Bezos to the Trump family. It's just unbelievable.
Speaker 2: And yet that's what they're focused on. And Robert Jeffries,
Speaker 2: of course was pushing the vaccines and everything else for
Speaker 2: Donald Trump because he wanted access, respectability, a seat at
Speaker 2: the table with powerful people. That's what they're looking for.
Speaker 2: By the way, we're at a time here I should
Speaker 2: mention you still can send some stuff. If you want
Speaker 2: to put in an AMA for me, ask me anything.
Speaker 2: I'm going to do that tomorrow and if you want
Speaker 2: to put that on on Rumble or send us an
Speaker 2: email at David Knightshow at ProtonMail dot com. You can
Speaker 2: ask me anything gooding about this if you want. I
Speaker 2: didn't quite get finished with it, but that's all the
Speaker 2: time we have for today.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much have a good.
Speaker 11: Day the common man.
Speaker 2: They created common Core and dumb down our children. They
Speaker 2: created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project
Speaker 2: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com