Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Friday, the thirteenth of December.
Speaker 1: Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, as we
Speaker 1: see FBI Director Christopher Ray leaving at the very last minute,
Speaker 1: he continued to lie about what happened on January sixth,
Speaker 1: And yet we have the Inspector General's report that says, yes,
Speaker 1: they were agent provocateurs who knew who knew. And yet
Speaker 1: at the same time we see one person after the
Speaker 1: other going to mar Lago to kiss the ring. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the man who betrayed the little guys is working with
Speaker 1: the big guys. You've got Zuckerberg poning up a million
Speaker 1: dollars to buy his way in. Worked out pretty good
Speaker 1: for Pfizer last time when they gave a million dollars
Speaker 1: a Trump for the inauguration. And of course Jeff Bezos
Speaker 1: is going there next week. And why not look at
Speaker 1: all the money that Elon Musk has made. You give
Speaker 1: Trump two hundred and fifty million or whatever it was
Speaker 1: for the campaign, you wind up making two hundred billion already,
Speaker 1: and the new rules for him have not even kicked
Speaker 1: in yet we'll be right back. Well, that's what they're making.
Speaker 1: You know what's happening to the people in North Carolina
Speaker 1: besides you know, some of them dying from the cold.
Speaker 1: Just last week we had another person dye from the
Speaker 1: cold as a Biden Gallavants ran in the globe throwing
Speaker 1: out bundles of billions of dollars to different people for everything,
Speaker 1: and Mike Johnson kind of twiddles doing nothing and not
Speaker 1: even talking about what they're going to do in terms
Speaker 1: of helping the people in North Carolina. And of course
Speaker 1: FEMA SIT's in their heated trailers collecting bonus pay. Well,
Speaker 1: they're not all inactive. You have the local officials in
Speaker 1: bunkhom County, in Bunkham County forcibly evicted these homeless people
Speaker 1: from the shelters that were built for them by the Amish.
Speaker 1: By the Amish, I said, at the very beginning of this,
Speaker 1: I said, to me, the best charity that was out
Speaker 1: there was what the Amish and the Midnight We're doing.
Speaker 1: There's different groups. This is not the group that I know,
Speaker 1: but they've gone in different places when the federal government
Speaker 1: would not help, they come in and they build homes
Speaker 1: for people, and they'll stay for years building these homes.
Speaker 1: And the Amish came in and built this pretty quickly
Speaker 1: so that it has some shelter. And now you got
Speaker 1: the local officials taking that away from them. Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 1: As one person said, how do you look at yourself
Speaker 1: in the mirror? They probably look at themselves a great
Speaker 1: deal of pride, because that's what their life is about.
Speaker 1: That's how they get their power. They get their power
Speaker 1: by the rules that they create for us. And there's
Speaker 1: nothing more powerful than being able to create arbitrary and
Speaker 1: capricious rules without regard for what it does to other people. Well,
Speaker 1: that's pure power. And these people are addictating, you know.
Speaker 1: When I look at Bunkham by the way, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know if maybe this is passed out of usage.
Speaker 1: Now that I grew up with we used the term Bunkom.
Speaker 1: I thought it was kind of funny when I in Florida.
Speaker 1: When I went moved to North Carolina, I saw Bunkhom County.
Speaker 1: Is it really eh? And the whole word, the etymology
Speaker 1: of this word is pretty interesting. Of course, the word
Speaker 1: means pure nonsense, and that's what we're seeing right here
Speaker 1: with the Bunkham County officials pure nonsense. Where it came
Speaker 1: from was back in the eighteen twenties, I think it
Speaker 1: was there was a congressman that was from Bunkhom County
Speaker 1: and they were having a debate over the Missouri Compromise,
Speaker 1: I think, and he just starts on this long winded
Speaker 1: oratory that was absolutely irrelevant. And the other congressman they
Speaker 1: were there, were pleading with him to stop. Come on,
Speaker 1: get to the point, bring this, you know, get say
Speaker 1: what you want to say, and shut up. You're not
Speaker 1: saying anything, you know. And he looked at them and
Speaker 1: he said, I am speaking to Bunkom and it entered
Speaker 1: the vocabulary going back to the teen twenties of something
Speaker 1: that is totally nonsensical and irrelevant. But of course Bunkhom
Speaker 1: County was also famous within North Carolina for a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of corruption locally, and so this is in Bunkhom County.
Speaker 1: Three weeks ago, hundreds of Amish carpenters began to work
Speaker 1: to build cabins in western North Carolina. I'd like to
Speaker 1: have the Amish build me a cabin. They make good stuff.
Speaker 1: Where many people are still using tents, but government officials
Speaker 1: in Bunckham County have begun forcibly victing homeless individuals from
Speaker 1: their tiny homes and their cabins that were built and
Speaker 1: donated by the Amish. These small, sturdy structures intended to
Speaker 1: be a temporary solution for people without stable housing, to
Speaker 1: provide a safer, more private, more dignified alternative to traditional
Speaker 1: homeless shelters. You see, this is very bef Skinner like. Right,
Speaker 1: what's the title his book? Beyond Freedom and dignity. Our
Speaker 1: government hates both of those things for us. We are
Speaker 1: not to be allowed to have freedom or dignity. The
Speaker 1: Amish built homes are designed to address an immediate need,
Speaker 1: offering homeless individuals are safe in a private space. Advocates
Speaker 1: for the homeless note that people avoid shelters. Why are
Speaker 1: they living on the streets. Well, because of shelters. It
Speaker 1: may not be safe. They've got a lot of rules
Speaker 1: there too, strict rules, lack of dignity afforded by the
Speaker 1: FEMA approved shelters. But you know that's the whole point.
Speaker 1: They don't want us to have any dignity. They hate us.
Speaker 1: You got to stop with us. I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people I've had this. My friend who is in
Speaker 1: the military, went to West Point. You know, later we'd
Speaker 1: have these conversations and I would start talking about what
Speaker 1: these people are, don't He goes, well, you have to
Speaker 1: always assume that somebody's just doing this out vignorance and
Speaker 1: not out of malice. Is that? How long do you
Speaker 1: have to assume that? You know, at what point does
Speaker 1: this callous indifference, this malicious indifference to other people? At
Speaker 1: what point are you going to call them that malice?
Speaker 1: These tiny homes were not a permanent fix, but they
Speaker 1: were a crucial step towards stability. The Bunkham County officials
Speaker 1: maintained that while tiny homes are not explicitly banned, any
Speaker 1: structure used for habitation must have access to plumbing and
Speaker 1: electricity in order to comply with housing codes. So let
Speaker 1: me ask you this, when they kick them out of
Speaker 1: these houses and knock them down, do the people have
Speaker 1: electricity in plumbing? Then what ridiculous kafka esque or Wellian nonsense.
Speaker 1: The people living in these homes were safer and healthier
Speaker 1: than they would have been in shelters or streets. Why
Speaker 1: not work towards solutions instead of tearing down on what
Speaker 1: is already helping them. Well, because it's buncom because it's
Speaker 1: pure nonsense, and folks, the pure nonsense and the arbitrary,
Speaker 1: capricious power that's being exercised everywhere. It's not limited to
Speaker 1: bunkhom County. Our entire bureaucracy is buncom Forcing people back
Speaker 1: into shelters or worse on the streets serves no one.
Speaker 1: These homes are a step toward dignity, safety, and independence. Well, no,
Speaker 1: it doesn't serve anyone. No, it serves the needs of
Speaker 1: the bureaucrats to dominate and to boss people around. They
Speaker 1: love that arbitrary power. And so that kind of brings
Speaker 1: us to January the sixth, and the lies and the
Speaker 1: deception and the manilplation of the FBI. Again, as Christopher
Speaker 1: Ray is on his way out at the last minute,
Speaker 1: he said, no, no, we didn't have any undercover agents there.
Speaker 1: And yet Horowitz's the report, Inspector General's report, says they had.
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice had twenty six hunder cover agents
Speaker 1: on duty. Today. You think it was that many or
Speaker 1: you think it was more. Are they telling you the truth?
Speaker 1: I said this from the very beginning. You know, you
Speaker 1: go back to December fourteenth, and that was when I
Speaker 1: just said, Okay, it's done.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: I knew this thing was a grift all along. I
Speaker 1: didn't want anything to do with it. I told Alex
Speaker 1: Jones in front of my crew, I said, I don't
Speaker 1: want you on my show selling that stuff. I thought
Speaker 1: he was going to fire me right then, but he
Speaker 1: waited a couple of months and I didn't talk about
Speaker 1: this stop to steal stuff until Monday, December the fourteenth,
Speaker 1: and that was when they sent in the electoral College stuff.
Speaker 1: And that point I explained to people what could have
Speaker 1: been done, what was not done, and I said, in
Speaker 1: this January the sixth stuff is absolute nonsense. And I said,
Speaker 1: you're going to it's a grift.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: They're just trying to steal money from you. That's what
Speaker 1: Alex was doing. I didn't realize that the very day before,
Speaker 1: on January the thirteenth, was the day that hadn't gone
Speaker 1: out of there, and they said, whatever it takes, Biden's going
Speaker 1: to be removed from office one way or the other.
Speaker 1: I went on the air the morning the next morning,
Speaker 1: I went out of the airsid it was it was
Speaker 1: a lie, and it was a grift. But when you
Speaker 1: look at this, I told people, I said, of course
Speaker 1: you're going to be entrapped with this. First of all,
Speaker 1: you're not going to accomplish anything. There's nothing to be accomplished. Secondly,
Speaker 1: there's going to be agent provocateurs there. They're going to
Speaker 1: trap you. They're going to use it to come after
Speaker 1: the entire conservative movement, which is exactly what did happen.
Speaker 1: So and then when it did happen, when it all
Speaker 1: you think Alex didn't know that it was there was
Speaker 1: going to be agent provocateurs. I mean he's always talking
Speaker 1: and everybody knows that. Everybody knows the history of the FBI.
Speaker 1: I mean, you had Judge and Politano on long time
Speaker 1: ago went through all these different events. He said, look
Speaker 1: at this, how the FBI set this up. They create
Speaker 1: a plan and then they get some patsies to come in,
Speaker 1: and they get them all hyped up, and they're recording
Speaker 1: and listening to everything that they say, and then they
Speaker 1: provide the plan for them to execute. They give them,
Speaker 1: if necessary, materials and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, they may give them some fake weapons or whatever,
Speaker 1: or some real weapons if that's necessary to set them up,
Speaker 1: and they do it, and they've done it over and
Speaker 1: over again. Alex used to always tell people, and it
Speaker 1: was true. He said, all of these right wing organizations
Speaker 1: in the ku Klux Klan and this lohem stuff and
Speaker 1: everything going back to the Oklahoma City bombing and things
Speaker 1: like that, that's all being run by Feds. They sought
Speaker 1: more recently with in Michigan a couple of times the
Speaker 1: hw to eave militia. And then you also had the
Speaker 1: situation and I've had the lady who's doing the documentary
Speaker 1: trying to get the documentary finished, but she's getting lots
Speaker 1: of opposition on a couple of times I've had her on.
Speaker 1: But you know, this whole idea of this plot to
Speaker 1: kidnap Quipmer and everything, it's all created by the FBI.
Speaker 1: They ran that whole thing. They got some Patsy's in there,
Speaker 1: and the guy, the FBI agent who ran it, guess what,
Speaker 1: he went back to Washington. Right after that. He goes
Speaker 1: back to Washington and he's the one who's presiding over
Speaker 1: all this January the sixth stuff. That's what it was
Speaker 1: from the very beginning. It's pretty clear. And yet immediately
Speaker 1: after this stuff happened, alex Is on the air saying
Speaker 1: it's no, it wasn't Ah, it was FBI, FBI provocateurs
Speaker 1: that were doing this stuff. So they said some of
Speaker 1: these sources were embedded among rioters. As a report from
Speaker 1: Horowitz eighty four pages, some of them were embedded among
Speaker 1: rioters in restricted areas, and four FBI sources also entered
Speaker 1: the capital with them. He did claim that the FBI
Speaker 1: didn't authorize any of those undercover agents to enter the
Speaker 1: capitol or to otherwise break the law. Oh yeah, he says,
Speaker 1: they didn't authorize them. But did they did break the law?
Speaker 1: Are you going to do anything about it? Now? He said,
Speaker 1: those who did enter restricted areas have not faced any charges.
Speaker 1: Sy didn't authorize them, But of course they're not going
Speaker 1: to penalize them either for this. So, as I've been
Speaker 1: talking about this week, Matthew Graves the guy who's running
Speaker 1: these persecutions, and they are persecutions. If people peacefully assembled
Speaker 1: and redressed their grievances, If the police are standing there
Speaker 1: at the open doors and telling people where to go,
Speaker 1: you come in and all this stuff, there's no crime.
Speaker 1: And he has now charged some fifteen hundred people. Actually
Speaker 1: the number is fifteen hundred and sixty and going still
Speaker 1: going up rapidly. Because of the years that it took
Speaker 1: for the confirmation to be revealed, Speculations suggested that law
Speaker 1: enforced agents who were part of the riot were even
Speaker 1: organized and embedded it well, of course, because that's what
Speaker 1: they always do. Well. The FBI undertook significant efforts to
Speaker 1: identify domestic terrorism subjects who plan to travel to the
Speaker 1: capital region, says a report, the FBI did not take
Speaker 1: a step that would have helped them. Yeah, you believe that,
Speaker 1: you really believe that. And yet WND, which I'm reading
Speaker 1: this account from everybody's covering it World d Daily WND
Speaker 1: covers for Trump, I say Trump repeatedly had offered to
Speaker 1: authorize National Guard troops to be at the Capitol that
Speaker 1: day to make sure there wasn't any significant violence, but
Speaker 1: his offer was rejected. Poor thing he's got executive offers
Speaker 1: is that one locked us down on March the thirteenth,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty an executive offer. Well, he did bribe people
Speaker 1: with money another executive orders, but his offer was rejected
Speaker 1: both at the city and the federal level. Who gets
Speaker 1: to reject an order from the president at the federal level.
Speaker 1: I'm curious about that. Who outranked him? Come on, he
Speaker 1: was telling people, meet me at the Yeah, does a
Speaker 1: speech go over here at the capital, Meet me at
Speaker 1: the Capitol. He didn't show up there. What did he know?
Speaker 1: What did he know? So he's egging people on these
Speaker 1: building false hope. That's going on for a couple of months.
Speaker 1: He goes there the day of and says, to meet
Speaker 1: me over there. We got organizing, we got equipping, we
Speaker 1: got profiteering. Who was it that organized all the stop
Speaker 1: the steal stuff? Who was the key evangelist with all
Speaker 1: that stuff? Well, you know, Trump was pretty much there.
Speaker 1: And as cowboys for Trump say, the founder who got
Speaker 1: caught up in all this? He said, it's the greatest
Speaker 1: entrapment in history. Well, he said it was Trump who
Speaker 1: entrapped him. And of course it was also what was
Speaker 1: going on was stop the steel human sources. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: they're very confident about all of this stuff. And I
Speaker 1: remember Darren Beattie talking about this the way he would
Speaker 1: look at it. He said, well, you know, you can
Speaker 1: tell who was the rat by who was not charged.
Speaker 1: I remember he famously focused on Reyepps. But if you
Speaker 1: remember before Ray Epps, he went after Stuart Rhodes, he
Speaker 1: went after Enriquetario. This is Darren Beatty at Revolver. Oh. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: they're the ones who did it. And quite frankly, I
Speaker 1: thought I thought that that was likely that Enrico Tario
Speaker 1: had been because he had in the past been an
Speaker 1: FBI informant. And he was the one person, the leader
Speaker 1: of the Proud Boys, who was not even there that
Speaker 1: day because the day before the police told him that
Speaker 1: he couldn't be in Washington, DC or something that looked
Speaker 1: to me like it was a real setup. And yet
Speaker 1: he's the person who was sentenced to the second longest
Speaker 1: term after Stuart Rhodes. And of course, as Stuart Rhodes
Speaker 1: was indicted, first of all, Darren Baeddy said, he ran,
Speaker 1: and he ran the whole thing. He'll never be charged anything.
Speaker 1: Then they indicted him. Then when they indicted him with
Speaker 1: this absurd Insurrection Act, Darren be d said, that's so
Speaker 1: over the top. That's just that the FEDS are coming
Speaker 1: up with these ridiculous overcharges to make sure that he
Speaker 1: doesn't get charged with anything. Then he got charged, and
Speaker 1: they got decades in jail, got the most jail time
Speaker 1: of anybody else. Darren Bettie never said anything about that,
Speaker 1: never followed up, and then of course sid Rico Terrio
Speaker 1: got the second most second longest jail term. So I said, well,
Speaker 1: I guess I was wrong about that as well. Doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that because he was an FBI informant once that
Speaker 1: he was still an FBI informant. I thought the events
Speaker 1: of that day were suspicious, but you know the elephant
Speaker 1: in the room, the person who was not charged. And
Speaker 1: I said this about Ray Epps. I said, you want
Speaker 1: to focus on ray Epps? He want to focus about
Speaker 1: what he said to people. Well, it was suspicious, sure,
Speaker 1: But I said, do those people go because REPS told
Speaker 1: him to go on January sixth? No? No, did REPS
Speaker 1: make any money from them? No? No, who was it
Speaker 1: was Donald Trump who told him to do? It was
Speaker 1: Alex Jones and all the stopped to steal people who
Speaker 1: told him to go, and they weren't charged. Alex wasn't
Speaker 1: charged with anything. So I don't know, you know what's
Speaker 1: going on? What do you think is going on with that? Well,
Speaker 1: you know when you look at the re Apps thing,
Speaker 1: and of course that was what got Tucker Carlson fired
Speaker 1: because he's going to get a lawsuit from Ray Apps
Speaker 1: and Fox News getting kind of tired of lawsuits on
Speaker 1: all this stuff. But if your standard, Darren Beattie for
Speaker 1: identifying the wolves among the sheep is to see who
Speaker 1: is influencing other people and not charged, what do you
Speaker 1: think about you know, what do you think about Ali Alexander?
Speaker 1: For example? Right, Ali Akbar was his name when he
Speaker 1: was convicted of fraud and a bunch of other charges.
Speaker 1: Then he changes his name Ali Alexander, and then he
Speaker 1: becomes a fixture and stop the steal. There he is
Speaker 1: with alex and there he is with Nick Fuentes and Alexander,
Speaker 1: and there's alway stop the steel stough. Well it was
Speaker 1: pretty big, made a lot of money, didn't They have
Speaker 1: millions of dollars with that, Ali Alexander said, And the
Speaker 1: lead up to this, he said, I pray that I'm
Speaker 1: the tool to stab these mother efforts. And while that
Speaker 1: was happening, he still had a monetized YouTube channel. How
Speaker 1: does that happen not only left on YouTube, but monetized
Speaker 1: on YouTube. These people who were not charged, these people
Speaker 1: who made so much money, these people who were the evangelist,
Speaker 1: and the cheerleaders and the sheep herders, that's what they were.
Speaker 1: You call them judas goats. I think sheep hurder is
Speaker 1: the best term with all that. And then, of course,
Speaker 1: you know Alex on you some of the thirteenth Biden
Speaker 1: will be removed one way or the other, all the bravado,
Speaker 1: all of this talk that is there. Well, when we
Speaker 1: come back, we're going to take a look at the
Speaker 1: pardons that are rolling out, and the ring kissing that
Speaker 1: is rolling out, and the massive profiteering that is already
Speaker 1: taking place. Tournator, thank you very much for a tip,
Speaker 1: he says David. I'm getting in here kind of late,
Speaker 1: but can you please tell us where we can find
Speaker 1: that video? This is from yesterday. We left this up.
Speaker 1: The video yesterday about the potential Brian Thompson and Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi connection that was sent to me. I think it
Speaker 1: was on Twitter. I was originally from originally from TikTok
Speaker 1: if you look at the aspect ratio of it, so
Speaker 1: it was a TikTok video that is on Twitter. I
Speaker 1: think I don't remember who it was that posted it there,
Speaker 1: but if you look for Brian Thompson and Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 1: You'll probably find that on Twitter. I think several people
Speaker 1: have put that up, But sorry, I can't give you
Speaker 1: any more information on that. At Possum King says North
Speaker 1: Carolina is another land Gram. Yeah, there's that as well.
Speaker 1: You know, that's one of the reasons why they're being
Speaker 1: so callous with these people. It truly is amazing, and
Speaker 1: we've talked about that. You know, what is there the
Speaker 1: opposition to these lithium mindes and the rest of the
Speaker 1: stuff that is there. Twelve June seventeen seventy six. This
Speaker 1: is what the Inspector General report said. We found no
Speaker 1: evidence of the materials we received or testimony we received
Speaker 1: showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they call them. They have a different name for them,
Speaker 1: the initial CHS. And you know they're kind of an informant.
Speaker 1: They would be lying to you. Everything they say is
Speaker 1: a lie. Just just switch one of the last two
Speaker 1: letters there instead of FBI, you get FIB. That's what
Speaker 1: they do all the time. They fib their lie enforcement.
Speaker 1: These are the people who enforced the lies of politicians
Speaker 1: from Russia Gate to January the sixth and beyond and beyond,
Speaker 1: to infinity and beyond as long as you don't stop it.
Speaker 1: It's always been that way. This is that's something that
Speaker 1: began with Trump. They used to be weaponized by right
Speaker 1: against the left back in the sixties and seventies. And
Speaker 1: of course Jaggar Hoover was one of the most corrupt
Speaker 1: bureaucrats that ever existed. He had blackmail files on everybody.
Speaker 1: Both Truman and Nixon talked about that, and when he died,
Speaker 1: a secretary went in and cleaned everything out. You get
Speaker 1: the name of Jaggar Hoover off of that building and
Speaker 1: we'll start and we'll talk, okay about any FBI credibility.
Speaker 1: A North American house hippoet must have been. Back in
Speaker 1: late November December twenty twenty, when David was doing the show,
Speaker 1: Alex interrupted with a special report from the road. When
Speaker 1: David came back, he blew a stack. Yeah, yep, I did,
Speaker 1: I did. Uh. He's thank you for the tip, He says,
Speaker 1: it's not much. I just realized my membership in your
Speaker 1: Rumble channel had lamps. Not sure how long it's been
Speaker 1: like that, but I reupped. Thank you so much. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that well. We're going to take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 1: and we'll be right back. We have a new ad.
Speaker 1: Let's put together by Karen. She wrote the script for
Speaker 1: this stuff and gave it to Whistler and he made
Speaker 1: this happen. And this is about our Christmas album.
Speaker 4: I wish I had a Christmas Night album.
Speaker 5: You can get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow
Speaker 5: dot com for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 6: There's right in the second floor there, say.
Speaker 7: What'd you?
Speaker 3: Was you?
Speaker 8: It?
Speaker 3: Well?
Speaker 5: Not just one wish a whole hat for first, I'm
Speaker 5: going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase the Christmas
Speaker 5: Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics like
Speaker 5: we Are you gonna throw it on?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 9: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 10: Can't you come on?
Speaker 5: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 5: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and it's
Speaker 5: all new.
Speaker 4: I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 3: What do you want?
Speaker 4: You want the moon?
Speaker 6: Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
Speaker 6: pull it down.
Speaker 7: I'll take it and.
Speaker 11: What and then I'll buy you your own download of
Speaker 11: David Knight's Christmas Night album.
Speaker 2: And you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, Bill Clinton goes on the view. At first he says,
Speaker 1: I hope that Biden doesn't issue preemptive pardons, And then
Speaker 1: before the program is out, he says, I hope he
Speaker 1: gets one to Hillary. He says, if Biden wanted to
Speaker 1: talk to me about that, I would talk to him
Speaker 1: about it. But I don't think I should be giving
Speaker 1: public advice on pardon power. Well, yeah, because he got
Speaker 1: in a lot of trouble with the crooks that he pardoned.
Speaker 1: If you remember public, he pardoned a big white collar criminal.
Speaker 1: Trump went way beyond that. You not only pardoned several
Speaker 1: of them, pardoned some mecade people as well as then
Speaker 1: taking one of these white collar criminals that was his
Speaker 1: son in law's father and making him ambassador to France.
Speaker 1: So most of us get out of this world ahead
Speaker 1: of where we'd get it at all, if we got
Speaker 1: was simple justice. So it's normally a fool's Aaron said Clinton,
Speaker 1: you spend a lot of time trying to get even.
Speaker 1: In other words, you know, just be happy for what
Speaker 1: you've got here, you know, chill out and stop murdering people.
Speaker 1: That sheriff said. Yeah, it's just just go with the flow.
Speaker 1: There says Bill Clinton. And yet he said I might
Speaker 1: need to talk to Biden about a premptive pardon for Hillary.
Speaker 1: He said he'd be willing to do it. He said,
Speaker 1: you know, they talked about locking her up. They may
Speaker 1: lock her up again. Yeah. And so you know, you
Speaker 1: got Trump's pardons of Jared's dad and all these other people.
Speaker 1: And yet even Bill Clinton is talking about the preemptive pardons.
Speaker 1: And so then Biden had a real big day yesterday.
Speaker 1: He pardoned thirty nine people, and he commuted the sentences
Speaker 1: of nearly fifteen hundred people. Now that's an interesting number,
Speaker 1: isn't it, because it almost exactly matches the number of
Speaker 1: J six prosecutions fifteen one hundred and sixty. Is the
Speaker 1: Union Party laying down the foundation for Trump to finally
Speaker 1: pardon the Jay six ers, which he should have done before,
Speaker 1: so that he can regain the trust of his base.
Speaker 1: Is that what they're doing, I mean everything that they're
Speaker 1: I said this of the weekend when Hunter was pardoned.
Speaker 1: I came back that Monday and I said, this is
Speaker 1: really good news. Yew. Most of the right was really disgusted,
Speaker 1: because we all know that Hunters are real criminal. We
Speaker 1: know that they laundered tens of millions of dollars. It's
Speaker 1: it isn't just that ten million dollars, but lots of it,
Speaker 1: So they criminally, you know, they made millions of dollars,
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars with pedaling influence, corruptly didn't
Speaker 1: report it for taxes. Of course, had the gun charge
Speaker 1: that was there, he had real crimes that were there,
Speaker 1: and all that stuff is just going to be expunged
Speaker 1: and going all the way back to his initial involvement
Speaker 1: in Ukraine, because that's what this is all really about.
Speaker 1: So people are rightfully upset about how Biden was basically
Speaker 1: pardoning himself, not just his son. But I said, no,
Speaker 1: this is good because nothing is going to happen to
Speaker 1: those people no matter what. And I want to get
Speaker 1: the j six people out of jail. And I said,
Speaker 1: it's going to force Trump's hand now with this, and
Speaker 1: it removes all the objections that people would have, you know,
Speaker 1: yelling at him how corrupt he was. The left is,
Speaker 1: you know, really fle mixed with all this, what do
Speaker 1: we do? You know, we laid this all down, We said,
Speaker 1: where for the rule of law? And Biden has just
Speaker 1: you know, pull their pants down and embarrassed them in
Speaker 1: front of everybody. It's just so the So they were
Speaker 1: very upset about it, but I thought it was a
Speaker 1: good thing. And now we see, interestingly enough, Biden now
Speaker 1: pardons fifteen hundred people, fifteen hundred and thirty nine actually,
Speaker 1: which is almost exactly the fifteen hundred and sixty. And
Speaker 1: so now it's getting more and more difficult for Trump
Speaker 1: to stab his people in the back again. And if
Speaker 1: he pardons thet Jay sixers, all will be forgiven of him.
Speaker 1: They will. MAGA has already pardoned him. They don't care.
Speaker 1: They don't care. All the stuff that happened to the
Speaker 1: Jay sixers, that's not Trump's fault that he didn't protect them.
Speaker 1: Everybody knew that Biden was going to do this stuff.
Speaker 1: And of course Biden is guilty for what he's doing,
Speaker 1: but Biden laid it. Trump laid it out there and
Speaker 1: let him do it without defending them. So I think
Speaker 1: that's my take on all this stuff. What I think
Speaker 1: is really behind this. I think this is a uniparty,
Speaker 1: and I think they're preparing everybody to get so solidly
Speaker 1: behind Trump. I mean, it is amazing to see how
Speaker 1: he is worshiped now everywhere. Biden commuted the sentences of
Speaker 1: nearly fifteen hundred individuals placed on home confinement during the
Speaker 1: pandemic so called and who has the successfully reintegrated into
Speaker 1: their families and communities for at least a year, And
Speaker 1: then he outright pardoned another thirty nine individuals. And he
Speaker 1: hasn't even started on the big political pardons yet. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, when we talk about pardoning people. There was
Speaker 1: a there was a tweet by some guy who is
Speaker 1: a doctor, an MD, Richard Fleming. I don't know who
Speaker 1: this guy is, but what he said was if Alex
Speaker 1: Jones can be found liable for emotional harm to parents
Speaker 1: of Sandy Hook children for saying that he didn't think
Speaker 1: that there was a gunman, That's not exactly what he said,
Speaker 1: but anyway, what should be the consequences for David Ike?
Speaker 1: He said, after telling millions of families who's loved ones
Speaker 1: died or were harmed by Star's COVID true that it
Speaker 1: really wasn't a pandemic and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: So what should we do to him? He lied and
Speaker 1: people died, is what he's saying.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 1: The person lied and caused people to die was Fauci.
Speaker 1: They weren't dying of COVID, They were dying of the
Speaker 1: ventilators and rim Dzevit and all these other things are
Speaker 1: being financially incentivized. And we've talked about that over and
Speaker 1: over again. But he put that out directly to David Ike,
Speaker 1: and so David Ike reposted that and replied, he said, so,
Speaker 1: what should be the consequences for all the doctors and
Speaker 1: nurses who administered this fake COVID vaccine only for their
Speaker 1: patients to die and to have their health destroyed for life,
Speaker 1: or to have their health destroyed for life. And all
Speaker 1: the politicians and the help officials who killed untold numbers
Speaker 1: with lockdown, who delayed treatment, who gave them Medaslam and
Speaker 1: rem da Zevir. Well, I'm just asking mister Fleming, right,
Speaker 1: they're the ones who have the blood on their hands.
Speaker 1: And of course it's not just the public people, but
Speaker 1: it's also Trump. What should be the cause for Trump?
Speaker 1: You see, the betray able to J six people is
Speaker 1: bad but it's nothing compared to the betrayal of these
Speaker 1: people who were killed with the Trump shot that he
Speaker 1: is still to this day so proud of. It's nothing
Speaker 1: compared to what Trump did to the Constitution and the
Speaker 1: precedents that he set in there. And of course there's
Speaker 1: also the media who hold Trump harmless for all of
Speaker 1: this stuff. And so you know, and by the way,
Speaker 1: the whole thing about Alex Jones, that was not what
Speaker 1: that was about. Anyway. The Sandy Hook thing didn't establish
Speaker 1: any precedents over the First Amendment. It never went to trial.
Speaker 1: If you don't comply with discovery, you lose by default.
Speaker 1: And that's what happened to Alex. And he lied and
Speaker 1: told his audience, well, I gave him everything they asked for,
Speaker 1: and they got caught red handed in a lie on
Speaker 1: the witness stand, just like Perry Mason. And Alex Jones
Speaker 1: even said, so this is your Perry Mason moment. It's like, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is this is the moment where we catch the
Speaker 1: guy red handed as he is on the stand, and
Speaker 1: yet his followers still follow him. Look, I didn't go
Speaker 1: hard after Alex when this other stuff was happening. I
Speaker 1: was not interested in seeing him locked up, but I
Speaker 1: was interested in seeing other people not be locked up,
Speaker 1: and I was interested in helping people to not follow
Speaker 1: this wolf among the sheep. But you know whatever I mean,
Speaker 1: at this point in time, anything that I say is
Speaker 1: not going to be used to lock him up. If
Speaker 1: it did, he'd be pardoned Trump. They're not going to
Speaker 1: come after him. He's one of them. He's one of them.
Speaker 1: How many ways do you have to see this? I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you full on board. He is ci a
Speaker 1: government control. He is using these people, he is conning them. Yes,
Speaker 1: he tells people the truth from time to time. That's
Speaker 1: necessary for you're a con man. So then when the
Speaker 1: moment comes, that's when the play is. You've got to
Speaker 1: lay a long pattern of truth out there and then
Speaker 1: you can pull reel them in. Well, the grifters that
Speaker 1: are joining around him now, Mark Zuckerberg, as I said before,
Speaker 1: giving a million dollars to Trump. Now even the technocrats
Speaker 1: are coming to kiss the ring, because look at what
Speaker 1: it did for Musk. She's made an unbelievable amount of
Speaker 1: money here. So Wall Street Journal points that Meta that
Speaker 1: owns Facebook and Instagram donated a million dollars to Trump's
Speaker 1: inaugural fund, which is what Pfeiser did for the twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen inauguration. And look what it got them. They got
Speaker 1: tens of billions of dollars for a one million dollar donation.
Speaker 1: There is no bet. I've said it before, there's no
Speaker 1: better return on your investment than to buy a politician.
Speaker 1: And that's one thing that Trump really knows how to do,
Speaker 1: and that is to shovel the money to his cronies
Speaker 1: and shovel the money he did. You know, when you
Speaker 1: go back and look at this, it's not just the
Speaker 1: the precedence of the lockdowns and to take the gun
Speaker 1: and do the due process some other time. Maybe it
Speaker 1: was also the financial aspect of it. The trillions of
Speaker 1: dollars that were added to the US money supply by year.
Speaker 1: Look at that twenty twenty the most now Janet Yellen printed,
Speaker 1: you know, forty two percent of the money. That said
Speaker 1: she was before she became Treasury secretary, she was at
Speaker 1: the Federal was there, but you know, oligant what six
Speaker 1: trillion or whatever went in there? Fizer turning a million
Speaker 1: dollars into tens of billions of dollars, and so Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: is on his way now, he's not stupid. He's putting
Speaker 1: the money in the inauguration fund, and uh, zero Hedge
Speaker 1: talks about it. But then zero Hedge thinks that Zuckerberg
Speaker 1: has had an epiphany now that he's forty years old.
Speaker 1: Can you believe that? On how you do you have
Speaker 1: to believe be to believe that? Oh yeah, he used
Speaker 1: to be a liberal, but now he's a conservative. He's
Speaker 1: had an epiphany. They said, as for a Zuckerberg, he's now,
Speaker 1: this is zero Hedge. He's now forty and his change
Speaker 1: of politics must come with age. Winston Churchill is often
Speaker 1: credited with saying that if you're not a liberal when
Speaker 1: you're twenty five, you have no heart, and if you're
Speaker 1: not a conservative by the time you're thirty five, you
Speaker 1: have no brain. And zero Hedge quotes that and says,
Speaker 1: welcome to forty Zuckerberg. Well, that's not what this is about.
Speaker 1: Is not a change of heart. It's his heart is
Speaker 1: focused on the love of money as always. That's why
Speaker 1: he's doing this. Some people, especially, oh, well, I think
Speaker 1: Trump's going to arrest him. Now, that's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: Trump wants his money. Jeff Bezos coming next week, going
Speaker 1: next week to mar Lago. Trump said yesterday morning Jeff
Speaker 1: Bezos will meet with him week, presumably at marl Ago.
Speaker 1: He made the announcement in live interview from the floor
Speaker 1: of the New York Stock Exchange yesterday. Trump opened the
Speaker 1: New York Stock Exchange. I mean, he is a conquering
Speaker 1: hero to everybody but me and you probably you would
Speaker 1: turned me off by now. Everybody loves him. Everybody loves Raymond. No, no,
Speaker 1: everybody doesn't love Raymond. Everybody does love Trump though. So
Speaker 1: he was there to ring the bell the opening, and
Speaker 1: behind him is a big display of how he is
Speaker 1: Times Person of the Year. I mean, it's a big deal.
Speaker 1: Even Malania came. So I will never trust the father
Speaker 1: of the jab. I will never trust the father of
Speaker 1: the lockdown. I will never trust the guy who moved
Speaker 1: the Overton window to universal basic income. I will never
Speaker 1: trust the guy who continues to lie about all of
Speaker 1: that stuff, the six trillion dollar debt king. That's what
Speaker 1: he is, as far as I'm concerned. And so again
Speaker 1: in the USA, USA, they're all chanting as he rings
Speaker 1: the bell and as these billionaires line up to kiss
Speaker 1: his ring and other things. I guess Trump is at
Speaker 1: the pentacle of pinnacle of his contentious list of a
Speaker 1: contentious list of global influencers, as he is the Time
Speaker 1: Person of the Year. Trump's political rebirth is unparalleled. They
Speaker 1: said he's got a rebirth. Got a rebirth politically, not spiritually.
Speaker 1: He was shunned, says Time, by most party officials when
Speaker 1: he announced his candidacy in late twenty twenty two, amid
Speaker 1: multiple criminal investigations. Little more than a year later, Trump
Speaker 1: cleared the Republican field, clinching one of the fastest contested
Speaker 1: presidential primaries in his history. Well why was he rejected, Well,
Speaker 1: there'd been very poor gp performance in the mid terms,
Speaker 1: and especially those candidates that he picked, you know, picked
Speaker 1: people like doctor oz To for Senate who couldn't even
Speaker 1: beat Fetterman, and then he went behind, got behind Blake
Speaker 1: Masters and on and on. You know, all these people
Speaker 1: he would support if they had somebody like Peter Tiel
Speaker 1: that was giving him money. And so that was there,
Speaker 1: and he didn't triumph over the criminal investigations. It was
Speaker 1: the criminal investigations that made him. It made him a martyr.
Speaker 1: And everybody was saying that at the time you know,
Speaker 1: I was saying it obviously, but so is James Carvill.
Speaker 1: You got to stop these prosecutions making him more popular
Speaker 1: all the time. We all see it. Everybody saw it
Speaker 1: on both sides. Maybe not time, maybe they are a
Speaker 1: little bit on the slow side. But then and when
Speaker 1: I saw that about David Ike, uh, you know he
Speaker 1: talks about how all of these celebrities and influencers, these billionaires,
Speaker 1: this crony corruption that is all there. Uh and uh.
Speaker 1: Russell Brand put this out talking about his experience at
Speaker 1: mar Lago, And again I think this is so typical
Speaker 1: of the shallow celebrity nonsense that is all around this movement.
Speaker 1: Here's Russell Brand enjoying his trip to mar a Lago.
Speaker 2: Did he before?
Speaker 6: Then?
Speaker 4: It's nice every day And I knew because there was
Speaker 4: secret service here.
Speaker 3: Though.
Speaker 6: I'm very grateful to being a double act of mel Gibson.
Speaker 3: All of a sudden, my life's changed quite a lot.
Speaker 12: A little while ago, I was a vegan living a simple.
Speaker 1: Life in grave Essex.
Speaker 13: No, I mean state, Finally, the world changes.
Speaker 12: When we awaken to the continue and perpeture principle connectivity
Speaker 12: and flow that He grants us, then we are powerful
Speaker 12: and real change becomes a possibility.
Speaker 13: I gotta follow that.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, we'll do like.
Speaker 12: Come here, you shoppy sausage stick to deliver in the
Speaker 12: presence and choose and who's naught in night?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 13: You need it during?
Speaker 11: You need me one time and it was like rain.
Speaker 13: It does not give a fuck with balls, and there's
Speaker 13: no umbrella for the truth.
Speaker 1: Certainly fair Ring consequent apparely had any double Robin's. Well
Speaker 1: that's about much as much of that as I can take.
Speaker 1: Once they bring the bagpipes out, well it strikes fear
Speaker 1: into the heart of their opponents. Actually, I do like
Speaker 1: bagpipes always make me laugh. Uh, always wanted a pair.
Speaker 1: I was in the band when we did Break it
Speaker 1: down and high school, and I was in the pit band,
Speaker 1: and they brought some kids in who had some their
Speaker 1: their theme, their mascot or whatever for their high school
Speaker 1: was the Highlanders or something, and so they had people
Speaker 1: on their marching band. They knew how to play a bagpipe,
Speaker 1: so they brought them in at one point in time,
Speaker 1: and then a dress rehearsal, they came in and did
Speaker 1: their bet. You know, they walked down the aisle up
Speaker 1: on the stage, or anything with the bagpipes and then
Speaker 1: golf into the wings and then let the air out
Speaker 1: of these things. And it sounded like a dying beehive.
Speaker 1: And I was rolling on the floor laughing, and they're like, God, cut,
Speaker 1: you take that thing outside, go outside the doors before
Speaker 1: you let that down. It was amazing how loud it was. Anyway,
Speaker 1: that's a tangent the uh. But when you look at that,
Speaker 1: you got mel Gibson, you got Russell Brand, you got
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson. And you know, then the next next day
Speaker 1: or so, they'll have all the log cabin Republicans and
Speaker 1: the LGBT people giving a war words to each other.
Speaker 2: There.
Speaker 1: It's a club. Praise God that you are not in that. Seriously, Seriously,
Speaker 1: it's truly amazing to see this, and this is what
Speaker 1: the people getting out. David Ike's response to that, well,
Speaker 1: as he said, mar Lago and the alternative media ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen, that's what it is, right, Russell Brand, Tucker
Speaker 1: Carls and all these people. He says, the best way
Speaker 1: to control the opposition, said Vladimir Lenin, the best way
Speaker 1: to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves. What
Speaker 1: was he talking about? There he's talking about the trust.
Speaker 1: The trust. That was what Felix dr Zhinski, the head
Speaker 1: of the Cheka, did, And I've talked about this many
Speaker 1: times and again you can see it portrayed Sam Neil
Speaker 1: and series about riley AS's spies, and basically they set
Speaker 1: up all of their opposition, all of these other countries.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of all these people were organizing talking
Speaker 1: about how they're going to get the Bolsheviks out of power,
Speaker 1: and so all the foreign opposition that was organizing, they
Speaker 1: were leading it. They were leading it, and they led
Speaker 1: the guy that inflaming pattern, James Bond, after they led
Speaker 1: him to his death. He's a pretty sophisticated spy. And
Speaker 1: so it was called the Trust. Now under Trump, we
Speaker 1: had trust the plan, and maybe what they missed was
Speaker 1: a comma should have been trust the plan or a
Speaker 1: dash trust the plan. The plan was trust. The plan
Speaker 1: was the trust, just like the Bolsheviks did. And it's
Speaker 1: still going on. So some people are concerned. Some people
Speaker 1: are plotting Trump's pick of Harmeet Dylan to lead the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. As Life site News
Speaker 1: points out, she was the lawyer for David de Leiden
Speaker 1: for the Senator for Medical Progress. I remember he had
Speaker 1: the undercover videos showing that Planned Parenthood was more than
Speaker 1: willing to negotiate for baby parts. I want that Lamborghini
Speaker 1: and all the rest of that stuff. And it was
Speaker 1: Lala Harris who came after him, came after him, didn't
Speaker 1: do anything for Planned Parenthood. No, no, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to pay attention to that. We're gonna come after him
Speaker 1: for recording these conversations. And she did, and then when
Speaker 1: she became senator, it got passed on to Javier Bressera,
Speaker 1: who is now the head of HHS for Biden. So
Speaker 1: two of them as a state attorney, and now there's
Speaker 1: a third person who was continuing on this persecution of
Speaker 1: David de Leiden, who exposed this heinous trafficking and body parts.
Speaker 1: Now Harmeat Dylan was his lawyer. I find that very
Speaker 1: interesting because and they say, well, that's good, you know,
Speaker 1: because she was defending him and his civil rights. And
Speaker 1: it is good that she would defend him in his
Speaker 1: civil rights. But how many times did you hear me
Speaker 1: say that the Republicans are so afraid of abortion? I said,
Speaker 1: you know, if they wanted to go bold, they would
Speaker 1: show what a baby. If they wanted to go really bold,
Speaker 1: they'd show what an abortion is. And it would be
Speaker 1: pretty bold for them to do a positive pro life
Speaker 1: ad to show the reality of babies. You know, mom,
Speaker 1: apple Pie babies. You don't want to get behind that, jupe,
Speaker 1: where's your family values? But I said, if they don't
Speaker 1: have the stomach to do either one of those, it
Speaker 1: would be a perfect point for them to attack La
Speaker 1: La Harris, who was the one who persecuted the guy
Speaker 1: who exposed the crime of trafficking and body parts. You
Speaker 1: want to show how heinous abortion is. You want to
Speaker 1: show how heinous planned parenthood is and callous they are,
Speaker 1: and you want to show Lalla's connection all that. That
Speaker 1: was the obvious thing to do, and yet her meat
Speaker 1: Dylan and I just realized that she was the lawyer
Speaker 1: for David de Lighton. I didn't realize that. But she
Speaker 1: spoke at the Republican convention, remember the RNC convention. She
Speaker 1: had a lot of It created a real controversy because
Speaker 1: she got up and she puts a prayer shawl on
Speaker 1: her head and she prays to Waha Guru, the only
Speaker 1: true God. Remember that she is I think a Sikh
Speaker 1: or something like that. And you had all these Republicans
Speaker 1: bowing their heads and you know, in agreement with her
Speaker 1: praying to Waha Guru, the only True God. A lot
Speaker 1: of people said, look, she's got her religious freedom. She
Speaker 1: can say what she wants. But that's beyond the pale
Speaker 1: for her to say that. Perhaps I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 1: I would say that about Jesus, the One True God.
Speaker 1: I would have no qualms about that. That's her religious
Speaker 1: thing there. But the issue I had was the the
Speaker 1: Republicans that were there bowing their head. Are they seek
Speaker 1: or are they just spineless? Right do anything? And yet
Speaker 1: my point about talking about her Meat Dylan is that
Speaker 1: she was very well known to them, given a speaking
Speaker 1: part there. Now he's making her the head of the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. All this stuff. They
Speaker 1: knew about all this they why are they putting in them?
Speaker 1: Because they knew that she was defending David Delighten. Why
Speaker 1: would the Republicans talk about that? Again, it is the
Speaker 1: most obvious thing to cut the rug out from underneath
Speaker 1: La La because she was involved in all of that.
Speaker 1: It is truly heinous what they're doing. And we got
Speaker 1: more to say about that, But we're going to take
Speaker 1: a break. Nor North American House Hippos says, no problem.
Speaker 1: They'll just meet with Rudy and get in a two
Speaker 1: million in cash. Problems solved, Yeah, or somebody's probably they
Speaker 1: got a different guy than Rudy. Rudy's a made man
Speaker 1: now and they know better than to use Rudy again.
Speaker 1: But and s here two thank you for becoming a
Speaker 1: monthly supporter there on rumble. We're going to take a
Speaker 1: quick break and we will be right back and now
Speaker 1: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14: That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
Speaker 14: on silver and gold from Eutoria has caused a dip
Speaker 14: in silver and gold.
Speaker 7: It's time to.
Speaker 4: Buy some medals with vietnaors before they come to there.
Speaker 15: Since is go to David Knight dot Gold to get
Speaker 15: in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn. He
Speaker 15: knows where to look to find silver and gold.
Speaker 3: A little.
Speaker 4: Yug fiat.
Speaker 1: You don't really have fia on your pick, Yeah, birdhouse Blues,
Speaker 1: says Harmeat Dylan is a Department of Justice civil rights
Speaker 1: born in Shandagar, India. She will help the millions of
Speaker 1: h one b visas from India. I agree, I agree.
Speaker 1: And of course you know Trump is he's going to
Speaker 1: kick out all these immigrants and everything, and yet he's saying,
Speaker 1: we're going to give people a green card if they
Speaker 1: get even a junior college degree, and we're going to
Speaker 1: help them too, because we'll give them in state tuition
Speaker 1: and we'll put them at the head of the list
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff. The deception is
Speaker 1: just amazing. That is there so washing posts how Elon
Speaker 1: Musk backed away from his climate crusade. He was once
Speaker 1: one of America's outspoken voices on the threat of climate change.
Speaker 1: Now he argues these existential risks have been overstated. He's
Speaker 1: a green grifter, right, a green grifter. And as a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, you know, top of the drug report yesterday,
Speaker 1: four hundred million dollar man. He's on his way to
Speaker 1: being the world's first trillionaire. And he also tweeted this
Speaker 1: out on Tuesday, three days ago, Doze designer retweeted what
Speaker 1: Donald Trump had to say. Trump tweeted out and said
Speaker 1: any person or company investing one billion dollars or more
Speaker 1: in the United States of America will receive fully expedited
Speaker 1: approvals and permits, including but in no way limited to,
Speaker 1: all environmental approvals, all upper case get ready to rock,
Speaker 1: and so Elon Musk approves of that. He said, this
Speaker 1: is awesome. Yeah, the big guys get richer. Right, if
Speaker 1: you invest a billion dollars, we're going to get rid
Speaker 1: of all rules and regulations. But if you're somebody in
Speaker 1: the mountains of North Carolina trying to survive after your
Speaker 1: house has been wiped out, and the Amish come in
Speaker 1: and build at their own expensive with their own labor,
Speaker 1: something for you, we'll take the away because we've got
Speaker 1: to obey the rules. But if you give them a
Speaker 1: billion dollars. See, that's a problem with the people in
Speaker 1: North Carolina. Those scumbags don't have a billion dollars. They're
Speaker 1: just non essential. I guess right, that's what Trump said, folks.
Speaker 1: I'm sick and tired of the two tiers. I'm sick
Speaker 1: and tired of this elitism. And it is as much
Speaker 1: alive in the Republican Party as it is in the Democrats.
Speaker 1: That just manifest itself in different ways. And so, you know,
Speaker 1: put in a billion dollars, you know what do you
Speaker 1: get if you give two undred fifty million directly to
Speaker 1: the president. Well, it's even better again. You invest two
Speaker 1: hundred fifty million, your net worth goes up by two
Speaker 1: hundred billion. Every dollar you invest in a politician like Trump,
Speaker 1: you get at least one thousand dollars back. I think
Speaker 1: I could become the world's richest man with that kind
Speaker 1: of return on investment. Right US had once called for
Speaker 1: a popular uprising. That was his term, a popular uprising
Speaker 1: against the fossil fuel industry. He did it in a
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen film, We Need to have a Popular Uprising.
Speaker 1: Now he's trying to push for a popular uprising for
Speaker 1: the right. He doesn't have any permanent allies, and he
Speaker 1: doesn't have any principles. He's only got permanent interest and
Speaker 1: his interests are becoming wealthier and wealthier. At Tesla, listen
Speaker 1: to this. Every internal PowerPoint presentation had to include numbers
Speaker 1: figures from former Vice President Al Gore's documentary and Inconvenient Truth,
Speaker 1: citing rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. I just talked
Speaker 1: about this again yesterday. I've talked about this so many times,
Speaker 1: Michael Mann and Tying It says, all as carbon dioxide
Speaker 1: goes up, is going to be directly proportional to the
Speaker 1: rise in temperature. Temperature is going to be driven by
Speaker 1: the rise in carbon dioxide. Except that's not true. It
Speaker 1: didn't happen. But that was the fundamental lie. That's a
Speaker 1: fundamental lie behind all this stuff. It is a fundamental
Speaker 1: lie that al Gore highlighted, as I've talked about many times,
Speaker 1: and Musk began every presentation at TESLA had to drive
Speaker 1: that lying propaganda from al Gore and Michael Mann, the
Speaker 1: guy who, as I pointed out yesterday, is the Anthony
Speaker 1: Fauci of the climate mcguffin. Michael Mann is the Anthony
Speaker 1: Fauci of the climate mcguffin, and he was being promoted
Speaker 1: in every meeting at TESLA by Musk. But now what's happening, Well,
Speaker 1: the lying on the left is now lying on the right.
Speaker 1: To paraphrase the WHO and not the World Health Organization,
Speaker 1: the group. You know, the paragraph about global warming is
Speaker 1: no longer required in TESLA PowerPoint dex and climate change
Speaker 1: is plummeted on Musk's list of priorities, and in August
Speaker 1: live stream on x he told Trump quote, we don't
Speaker 1: need to rush to solve the climate crisis, that hockey
Speaker 1: stick and all the rest. It was an existential threat.
Speaker 1: We're all going to die. Yeah, all of these things
Speaker 1: that they have done. You know, now, just like the
Speaker 1: pandemic went away, that we're all going to die with
Speaker 1: the pandemic, you know, we had to do all the
Speaker 1: Simon says rules only walk one way in the stores,
Speaker 1: and you got to wear your mask and get behind
Speaker 1: the plexi glass and all the rest of stuff. All
Speaker 1: that just went away. And now the existential threat, we're
Speaker 1: all going to die for this stuff. Let's going on
Speaker 1: right And but you know, one of the things that's happening,
Speaker 1: it's kind of interesting just you know, eight years ago,
Speaker 1: he's still pushing al Gore's Inconvenient Truth, which was done
Speaker 1: at that point in time. It was about what do
Speaker 1: you do? Two thousand and two thousand and two, No,
Speaker 1: two thousand, he was still run for present. I think
Speaker 1: it came out around two thousand and one, two thousand
Speaker 1: and two, something like that, and so it was pretty old,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe about fifteen fourteen, fifteen years old, and
Speaker 1: he's still pushing it. But here we are eight years later,
Speaker 1: and not only is he not pushing it, and not
Speaker 1: only is he saying we don't need to rush. He's
Speaker 1: part of the crowd that is rushing to push out
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence, which is pushing out more using up more energy.
Speaker 1: And guess what. All that energy is being provided for
Speaker 1: the most part by fossil fuels that they want to ban. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the fossil fuel things. We have to have a popular
Speaker 1: uprising against fossil fuels, he said, except now he's consuming
Speaker 1: them in vast quantities and saying, don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: Don't worry about it. Once they get their nuclear power
Speaker 1: plants in, oh, then you better worry about it, because
Speaker 1: then they're going to come after you to shut down
Speaker 1: what's left there. Once they get their power supply, set
Speaker 1: up their own personal nuclear plant, all these technocrats with
Speaker 1: their AI people like Elon Musk. Once they've got that,
Speaker 1: then they're going to get very concerned again about the
Speaker 1: lit bit of power that you use. So again, net
Speaker 1: worth of four hundred billion, his one day wealth jump
Speaker 1: of sixty two point eight billion is the largest on record.
Speaker 1: He's the first person to have a net worth of
Speaker 1: four hundred billion. And he will, like I said, before
Speaker 1: the end of Trump's term, I expect to see him
Speaker 1: as the world's first trillionaire, really do. And so we
Speaker 1: look at what Doge is doing.
Speaker 3: You know, this.
Speaker 1: This virtue signaling his new thing that he's doing with
Speaker 1: Ramas Slimy. Doge is setting at sites on high speed rail. Well,
Speaker 1: you know these high speed rail projects and these monorail projects.
Speaker 1: Even the Simpsons used to joke about these. And we
Speaker 1: even had in Raleigh. We had a lot of Socialist
Speaker 1: Marxist city council members and anything. One of the meetings
Speaker 1: I went to they had this woman got up. I've
Speaker 1: told this story before. This is before the Soviet Union
Speaker 1: fell in nineteen eighty nine, and she was as enamored
Speaker 1: of their subway system as Tucker Crossing. She came back
Speaker 1: from Moscow. You might ask yourself, you know, well, because
Speaker 1: she's a hardcore comie, you know, just like Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: and you know Tim Waltz and all these other people,
Speaker 1: the Blasio that they loved to honeymoon in Russia or
Speaker 1: in Cuba or whatever. Well, she wanted to go to
Speaker 1: communist Russia and hang out with like minded people, you know.
Speaker 1: And she said you could go anywhere in Moscow for
Speaker 1: a nickel, And I said it cost you every cost
Speaker 1: those people everything, cost them all their freedom. That's what
Speaker 1: winds up happening with this stuff. But she wanted to
Speaker 1: put a rail system in Raleigh, and Raleigh was not
Speaker 1: a concentrated, high density city or anything like that. It
Speaker 1: was ridiculous, But this has always been and that's I
Speaker 1: said you had. Even the Simpsons were making fun of
Speaker 1: this trend with all these power hungry bureaucrats everywhere who
Speaker 1: want to make you dependent on them for your transportation,
Speaker 1: just like Elon Musk does with the self driving cars.
Speaker 1: It's all the same scams, just different manifestations of it.
Speaker 1: The whole point is to make sure that you don't
Speaker 1: own anything, that you won't go anywhere unless you use
Speaker 1: the transportation that they provide, so that they have control
Speaker 1: over you in that area of your life. So one
Speaker 1: area they couldn't control us with the lockdown, and they're
Speaker 1: furiously trying to get this going. But now you've got
Speaker 1: these boondoggle programs, and that really is a low hanging fruit.
Speaker 1: Booty Guey, he's kind of a low hanging fruit himself.
Speaker 1: And you know, he's got that big infrastructure amounts of
Speaker 1: money and he's throwing in around and grabbing nuisance the
Speaker 1: governor of California. This is an opportunity as well for
Speaker 1: Musk to get some revenge from grabbing nuisance in California.
Speaker 1: So you better believe that this is on the chopping block.
Speaker 1: This is a classic case of a bridge to nowhere,
Speaker 1: nothing that anybody wants or needs, and it has busted
Speaker 1: the budget over and over again. So you better believe
Speaker 1: they're going to shut that thing down because again it
Speaker 1: goes for his revenge as well as for anything else.
Speaker 1: Twelve June seventeen seventy six. Thank you very much. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that. So let's get busy with this Christmas month's meter.
Speaker 1: Did you get that updated this morning? Okay, well I'm
Speaker 1: not sure it should be at the three eighths thing,
Speaker 1: so appreciate that very much. Thank you, Star Barkley, Thank
Speaker 1: you as well. I appreciate that. So okay. June seventy
Speaker 1: seventy six, I raise your ten dollars and Atomic Dog
Speaker 1: thank you for their minder. Help David Night spread Christmas
Speaker 1: cheer by liking the video, sharing on social media and
Speaker 1: subscript Thank you, he says, and we will be right back.
Speaker 4: I wish I had a Christmas Night album.
Speaker 5: You can get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow
Speaker 5: dot Com for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 6: There's right in the second floor there, say.
Speaker 3: Would you wish, George, Well, not just one wish, a.
Speaker 5: Whole hat for first, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot
Speaker 5: Com and purchase the Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna
Speaker 5: listen to Christmas classics like are you gonna throw it on?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 9: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 10: Can't you come old?
Speaker 5: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 5: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
Speaker 5: all new.
Speaker 4: I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 3: What do you want?
Speaker 6: You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll
Speaker 6: throw a glasshole around it, pull it down.
Speaker 11: I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 11: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Naburu twenty twenty nine says that MAGA making aristocracies great again. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so we've got to welcome to the coming feudalism under
Speaker 1: King Donald. And you know, when we talk about Musk,
Speaker 1: one of the things I didn't say about him is
Speaker 1: also you know he can get even with grab a
Speaker 1: nuisance over this nonsense project. And of course he can
Speaker 1: now take the high road and say we're going to
Speaker 1: get rid of subsidies for evs now that he's gotten
Speaker 1: the maximum amount allowed under the law. And Tesla doesn't
Speaker 1: get subsidies anymore for the vehicles that they sell, but
Speaker 1: his competitors do, so, he says, so he gets all
Speaker 1: the subsidies as he's building his business, and then he
Speaker 1: moves his way into control Trump and to make sure
Speaker 1: that they are going to get rid of these subsidies
Speaker 1: for his competitors as they come around. Look, I never
Speaker 1: support these subsidies. I think they're wrong. But we all
Speaker 1: see what's going on here. It's not only a green grift.
Speaker 1: It's not only green washing that he's doing. But he's
Speaker 1: very clever in terms of how he is using this stuff.
Speaker 1: That's how he became the world's richest man. Well, the
Speaker 1: EPA advisor has been caught by Project Veritas on tape
Speaker 1: and he's talking about what they're doing. He says, we
Speaker 1: are throwing as much money as we can into these
Speaker 1: foundations that are there and these private foundations. We're just
Speaker 1: throwing money at him and he goes and it might
Speaker 1: work out pretty good. You know, I might wind up
Speaker 1: getting to be wonderful if I got a job with
Speaker 1: one of them. That's the way this works, Right. You
Speaker 1: got somebody like Musk and he buys influence from Trump
Speaker 1: and Trump throws contracts to him. Or then you have
Speaker 1: the people who are in government and they throw money
Speaker 1: to these organizations, and then they get out and it's
Speaker 1: a revolving door and they go to work for them.
Speaker 1: Trump's head of HHS came from pharmaceutical companies. He's CEO
Speaker 1: of Eli Lilly alex Zar and then his two FDA heads,
Speaker 1: one of them, after they left, went to Pfizer, the
Speaker 1: other one went to Moderna. This big revolving door that's there. Well,
Speaker 1: an EPA official appears to confirm what many of law
Speaker 1: suspected taxpayer money is being shoveled out the door with
Speaker 1: reckless abandon all in the name of climate policy. Do
Speaker 1: people like Musk and his ilk, Right, But now we're
Speaker 1: going to stop that. We're going to shift gears. The
Speaker 1: officials' words paint a damning picture of an agency prioritizing
Speaker 1: speed over prudence, all to sidestep political obstacles. His cavalier
Speaker 1: attitude suggests the real motive is not saving the planet,
Speaker 1: but safeguarding their funding from potential Republican oversight. And he
Speaker 1: used the metaphor of throwing goal bars off of the Titanic.
Speaker 1: He says, we're throwing goal bars off the Titanic, and
Speaker 1: we're getting this money out, admitting that the agency's spinning
Speaker 1: street is less about strategic investments and more about ensuring
Speaker 1: the funds are locked into programs the future administrations can't reverse.
Speaker 1: And again, the main thing that needs to be reversed,
Speaker 1: which Trump would not do in his first term, it's
Speaker 1: a Paris Climate Court. He pretended that we were legitimately
Speaker 1: in that. It's a treaty. Nobody went through the process
Speaker 1: of approving a treaty. It was self ratified by John
Speaker 1: Kerrey and Barack Obama. But Trump pretended that we were
Speaker 1: in it. And if we're in it, it takes four
Speaker 1: years to get out of it. So his hands were tied.
Speaker 1: He couldn't do anything. The EPA is deliberately funneling billions
Speaker 1: in A nonprofits to insulate the funds from political accountability,
Speaker 1: he said. And when you look at comments that the
Speaker 1: guy made on tape, his name was Ephron. He openly
Speaker 1: admits how the EPA uses nonprofits as a political buffer
Speaker 1: against Republican administrations, and he reveals how he could later
Speaker 1: reap personal rewards with a cushy job at one of
Speaker 1: the nonprofits that he helped to fund. Over the last year,
Speaker 1: he said, we've given out fifty billion dollars for climate things,
Speaker 1: climate things, needful things. So to go work for one
Speaker 1: of these places would be really cool, he said, because
Speaker 1: they got lots of cash. I know, because I got
Speaker 1: it to them. Folks, we've got to kill the EPA
Speaker 1: or it's going to kill us. It's just that simple.
Speaker 1: I forget that it was created by Nixon.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: Sometimes you got to have Republican that you think is
Speaker 1: behind you and so that he can stab you in
Speaker 1: the back. When we look at what is happening in
Speaker 1: the UK with all this climate fraud. I mentioned the
Speaker 1: other day that they've got all of these non existent
Speaker 1: temperature measuring stations one hundred and three to be precise,
Speaker 1: and this is all part of the UK met office.
Speaker 1: These are the people who are running it. It's reported
Speaker 1: by the Daily Skeptic and it got shared all over
Speaker 1: the internet. Inventing temperature averages from over one hundred non
Speaker 1: existent measuring stations. So I have a station here, in
Speaker 1: a station there, and they would just average them together
Speaker 1: and pretend that they had a station there that was
Speaker 1: measuring the temperature. The met Office went so far as
Speaker 1: to supply coordinates, elevations, and purposes for the imaginary sites
Speaker 1: imaginary sites, and so that helped these people to identify
Speaker 1: the fact that they didn't exist. And of course the
Speaker 1: conditions and the instruments and all the rest of this
Speaker 1: stuff have radically changed over time. For the places where
Speaker 1: they really do have weather stations, you know, they might
Speaker 1: have been out in a rural area. Now there maybe
Speaker 1: on the airport tarmac. Who's going to get a hotter reading? Right.
Speaker 1: For the longest time, we were in Raleigh and we
Speaker 1: would drive out to where we lived down in the
Speaker 1: forest out in Exerbs. I guess you could say we
Speaker 1: would routinely see the temperature drop year round by four degrees.
Speaker 1: And they're pushing the panic button if things change by
Speaker 1: one a half degrees centigrade, so that was more than
Speaker 1: that fahrenheit. Anyway, they said, if they were to actually
Speaker 1: admit all of this stuff, of course they'd be opening
Speaker 1: a Pandora's box. They'd run the risk of subjecting the
Speaker 1: Met Office's temperature claims to wider scrutiny. Instead, what the
Speaker 1: Met Office has done is they discreetly renamed their UK
Speaker 1: Climate Averages page. They called it Location specific Long Term Averages.
Speaker 1: Significant modifications have been made to the new page, designed
Speaker 1: to doubt no doubt, to quash suspicions that the Met
Speaker 1: Office has been making the figures up as it went along,
Speaker 1: just all this stuff. The original suggestion that's selecting a
Speaker 1: climate station can provide a thirty year average from nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety one to twenty twenty has been replaced with an
Speaker 1: explanation of the page as quote designed to display locations
Speaker 1: that provide even geographical coverage of the UK. But it's
Speaker 1: not reflective of every weather station that has existed or
Speaker 1: the current Met Office observation, so they quietly go back
Speaker 1: in and change it. You know, we were reporting the
Speaker 1: fact that the EPA was hyping this idea of fine
Speaker 1: particular matter. There's two point five nanometers or smaller that
Speaker 1: came out of was a product of diesel engines, or
Speaker 1: the product of fireplaces or barbecues or whatever they wanted
Speaker 1: to ban at the time. And we talked about that,
Speaker 1: and I did a report of that in a fall
Speaker 1: of twenty twelve. And on the page where they talked
Speaker 1: about PM two point five particular matter two point five,
Speaker 1: they showed the smoky mountains and they said it was
Speaker 1: an example of particular matter. It's like, no, the fog
Speaker 1: that is there a clueless can he and I did
Speaker 1: a report of that and within a week they pulled
Speaker 1: that down. That was the first thing I did when
Speaker 1: I went in four wars. Anyway, this is the same
Speaker 1: type of thing. Right. They had a page and they
Speaker 1: said click on this and we'll give you a thirty
Speaker 1: year average for this page. These weather stations don't even exist.
Speaker 1: The Senecal might note that the Met Office has solved
Speaker 1: its problem of inventing data from non existing stations by
Speaker 1: suggesting that they now arise from locations which may or
Speaker 1: may not bear any resent relation to stations that once
Speaker 1: existed or may exist today. We don't know where this
Speaker 1: stuff is coming from, but you know, you should be
Speaker 1: very afraid because of what we're giving you. Also in
Speaker 1: the UK, also associated with the UK Met Office, Ed Milliban,
Speaker 1: who is official there, has just released some information. His
Speaker 1: department has claimed that the thirty year average temperature is
Speaker 1: higher than the warmest year on record. Think about that,
Speaker 1: You've got an average that is higher than the peak value.
Speaker 1: These stupid bureaucrats can't don't even understand basic arithmetic of
Speaker 1: how you calculate averages. How in the world could you
Speaker 1: have an average that is higher than the peak value? Outright? Liars,
Speaker 1: aren't they? It might be easier and more cost effective
Speaker 1: to just make these figures up. They said, well, actually
Speaker 1: they do. They do make the figures up, and they
Speaker 1: come up with novel interpretations of what an average is
Speaker 1: as well. And then we're talking about figures and rising figures.
Speaker 1: In New England we have you want to talk about inflation,
Speaker 1: let's talk about electricity rate inflation, they point out, And
Speaker 1: what's up with that? They said, this is political electricity. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is the legacy of people like Elon Musk who
Speaker 1: have pushed all of these lives and al gore electricity
Speaker 1: bills in New England are poised to experience a sharp
Speaker 1: increase driven by the so called clean Energy mandate in
Speaker 1: five of the six states of New England which require
Speaker 1: duplicative over built renewable energy. Why is it duplicative, Well,
Speaker 1: because you have to have the real stuff there that
Speaker 1: is reliable and affordable, and then you can have your
Speaker 1: vanity project of solar or wind for the grid. And again,
Speaker 1: as I said before, now a lot of people know, well,
Speaker 1: I got solar is great. I think it is great.
Speaker 1: If you use it to get off the grid, it's
Speaker 1: going to be expensive. But if you use it to
Speaker 1: get off the grid and become independent, that's fine. But
Speaker 1: it is sheer folly if you think that you're going
Speaker 1: to use these intermittent power sources that are so incredibly
Speaker 1: variable for the grid which demands steady state power delivery.
Speaker 1: And so of course now we're going to add on
Speaker 1: another bag which will benefit Elon Musk and I expect
Speaker 1: this to be a big chunk of his wealth, moving
Speaker 1: as he does towards a trillionaire. These battery energy storage sites,
Speaker 1: and you've got the Tennessee Valley Authority around this area
Speaker 1: is looking into getting these massive battery installations that they
Speaker 1: can charge up a solar power wind when the sun
Speaker 1: is shining and the wind is blowing, and then put
Speaker 1: the grid on a massive battery. This is absolutely insane,
Speaker 1: massive expense, a tremendous fire risk, but the money is
Speaker 1: going to go to Elon Musk And so what's happening
Speaker 1: in New England Connecticut is the worst of the worst.
Speaker 1: The Northeast has become the most expensive region in the
Speaker 1: continent for electricity and people in New York. As I
Speaker 1: pointed out before, all, this massive wind farm's being put
Speaker 1: up there run by some oil companies out of Scandinavia. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're repositioning themselves. You know, That's what I always said
Speaker 1: about Rex Tillerson the first time, I said, this guy
Speaker 1: is a grifter, a green grifter. Everybody, you're crazy. You
Speaker 1: don't even know who this guy is. He's like the
Speaker 1: CEO of Exxon. He's not a green grifter. It's like, idiot,
Speaker 1: don't you realize that it's the that it is the
Speaker 1: oil companies that are jumping into this. It's just like
Speaker 1: everything else. They say, well, we're going to ban The
Speaker 1: way that we're doing it right now is cheap and efficient,
Speaker 1: so we're going to ban that and we've got a
Speaker 1: new thing that's coming up. Everybody's got to have it.
Speaker 1: You've got to have this new thing that we have
Speaker 1: already developed here, and you're going to pay through the
Speaker 1: nose for it. And this what's happening going to happen
Speaker 1: to the people there on Long Island. They got this
Speaker 1: massive wind farm offshore, and as I've said before, the
Speaker 1: actual profits that they're going to be making, the profits
Speaker 1: are going to be more than double what the nearly double,
Speaker 1: not quite double, they're going to be. Let's just say
Speaker 1: double what the entire cost is right now, just the
Speaker 1: profit part of it is going to be double what
Speaker 1: the entire cost is to the consumer. And so a
Speaker 1: lot of people said, we'll expect the the cost of
Speaker 1: the consumer to go up by about a factor of five.
Speaker 1: So that's on its way, but that's not included in
Speaker 1: this report about what is happening in New England. It
Speaker 1: is truly amazing, and they go through state by state,
Speaker 1: Massachusetts and all the rest of them. This is all
Speaker 1: being driven and it is a massive kind of inflation,
Speaker 1: and it will kill our economy and it will kill
Speaker 1: our manufacturing if we allow these people to keep stealing
Speaker 1: money from US this way. This is how they become
Speaker 1: so wealthy. Marky, Mark, thank you for the tippy said
Speaker 1: Osha also came into existence during the Nixon administration. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: fifty five mile hour speed limit. As why, it's a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff. That's why I could never understand Roger
Speaker 1: Stone his having Nixon's face on his back. I said, well,
Speaker 1: he wasn't backstabbing president, wasn't he. Matthew ron Sinday says,
Speaker 1: I watch the YouTube video of a guy who went
Speaker 1: across the US checking weather stations along the way like
Speaker 1: an easter eg hunt. Most of them were in poor repair, missing,
Speaker 1: too close to parking lots, air conditioning, exhaust vents and
Speaker 1: so forth. Yeah, that's it. And a lot of them
Speaker 1: are in airport tarmacs. And then, as the founder of
Speaker 1: the Weather Channel pointed out, he said, our historical data,
Speaker 1: and there's not that much of it. We got that
Speaker 1: off of analog mercury thermometers. You can't get that within
Speaker 1: a half a degree accuracy. It's ridiculous. Three Little Birds
Speaker 1: says I'm in upstate New York. It's getting harder to
Speaker 1: live every day in every way. So sorry, so sorry
Speaker 1: to hear that. Well, We're going to take a quick break.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, as we have the back and forth,
Speaker 1: and we had the arguments before the Supreme Court about
Speaker 1: whether or not Tennessee was going to be allowed to
Speaker 1: protect minors from these planned parenthood predators seeking to sterilize
Speaker 1: and mutilate them after they've been gas lit by the
Speaker 1: government schools over there, excuse me over their gender. The
Speaker 1: UK is leftist as the UK is. Even the UK
Speaker 1: has backed off of this transgender stuff for kids. They've
Speaker 1: shut down the Tatistock place. And now the UK is
Speaker 1: going to ban pubberty blockers for miners indefinitely. And of course,
Speaker 1: as this was before the Supreme Court, all these people
Speaker 1: on the left, this is the end of the world, right,
Speaker 1: Look at how intolerant these people are. They're not going
Speaker 1: to allow us to sterilize and mutilate miners using drugs
Speaker 1: that they used to use to castrate rapists. And so
Speaker 1: this is their Commission on Human Medicines said, there's quote
Speaker 1: currently an unacceptable safety risk for all of this. And
Speaker 1: now in California you've got a doctor who's being sued
Speaker 1: for having removed the breasts of a minor, and she
Speaker 1: said she was not given informed consent. It's an interesting
Speaker 1: case because California is so on board with abuse of children,
Speaker 1: and yet they have in terms of lawsuits against people.
Speaker 1: It's also much easier to win in California than many
Speaker 1: other states, so it is kind of a toss up
Speaker 1: here in this race. A woman who had her breast
Speaker 1: removed to the age of fourteen, who is now twenty
Speaker 1: part of a medical gender transitioning has sued the California
Speaker 1: doctor and others involved in the transition. She is saying
Speaker 1: that they are guilty of medical negligence for putting on
Speaker 1: puberty blockers on male hormones and having a surgeon perform
Speaker 1: a double masectomy. The lawsuits had the defendants Qute failed
Speaker 1: to get informed consent unquote, they concealed important information, and
Speaker 1: they made numerous material misrepresentations in order to convince her
Speaker 1: parents to agree, they told her that the puberty blockers
Speaker 1: were quote completely reversible, so she The doctor whose name
Speaker 1: is Ulsen Kennedy hyphenated last name, allegedly told her parents
Speaker 1: that she would kill herself if she didn't transition, but
Speaker 1: the complaint said that brain was not suicidal. But that
Speaker 1: is a lie that they tell everybody. That is a
Speaker 1: lie based on which they started all of the propaganda
Speaker 1: that was that is being used to gaslight kids. Well,
Speaker 1: we got to make everybody love this because if you
Speaker 1: don't love it, these people are going to commit suicide. Well,
Speaker 1: the amazing thing is is that the suicide rate is
Speaker 1: higher for the people who have transitioned. They're the ones
Speaker 1: who are struggling all of their life because of the
Speaker 1: way they've been mutilated with the bottom surgery, both male
Speaker 1: and female, and it has been such a horrific thing
Speaker 1: that that alone is driving many of them to suicide.
Speaker 1: When she stopped a testosterone she said her mental health improved.
Speaker 1: The complaint said that she had was causing her to
Speaker 1: have a foggy brain. Fog. The complaint went over the
Speaker 1: financial incentives of the medical facility to diagnose the child
Speaker 1: with gender dysphoria as soon as possible, labeling them quote
Speaker 1: a lifelong revenue stream. This is what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: It's all just about the money. Everything that these people do.
Speaker 1: The complaint noted that the dessistance rate, or the rate
Speaker 1: at which transgender children decided to revert back to their
Speaker 1: birth gender is eighty to ninety percent. Olsen Kennedy, the doctor,
Speaker 1: admitted to The New York Times last month that she
Speaker 1: refused to publish the results of a ten million dollar
Speaker 1: study paid for by taxpayers that she conducted. Sounds a
Speaker 1: lot like Michael Mann, doesn't it. You get the government
Speaker 1: to pay for the study and then hide the information.
Speaker 1: You do whatever you want, you take the money. In
Speaker 1: this particular case, she was paid ten million dollars for
Speaker 1: the study, came up with information that she didn't want
Speaker 1: people to see because she's got a lifelong revenue stream
Speaker 1: with these kids. That study found that purity blockers did
Speaker 1: not improve mental health and children. She said she was
Speaker 1: concerned that the studies results could be used in courts
Speaker 1: to argue that quote, we shouldn't use blockers because it
Speaker 1: doesn't impact them, referring to the transgender adolescents, and so
Speaker 1: the lawsuit stands a chance of winning in California, despite
Speaker 1: the state's permissive laws about gender transitioning of miners. The
Speaker 1: American Tort Reform Association regularly ranks California among the top
Speaker 1: few areas in the country. They call them judicial hellholes
Speaker 1: because of their novel theories of liability. Well, let's hope
Speaker 1: that these people get thrown into that and stop harming kids.
Speaker 1: But again, she is very famous, this doctor Joanna Olsen Kennedy,
Speaker 1: and she used purbity blocker's hormones and then came up
Speaker 1: with a double missectomy on this victim of hers. A
Speaker 1: mother promoted by CNN claims that her ten year old
Speaker 1: son knew since birth that he was a transgender. Do
Speaker 1: you think babies know that their boy or girl? Do
Speaker 1: you think they know that, even though you are putting
Speaker 1: them in blue clothes, that they're really a girl. Do
Speaker 1: you think that's really the case. And yet the ire,
Speaker 1: the well earned ire from conservative sites about this, is
Speaker 1: not directed toward doctor Oz. Now Life site put this up,
Speaker 1: and they did criticize doctor Oz for what he was doing,
Speaker 1: but he was also pushing this. It's not just CNN.
Speaker 1: It's doctor Oz that Trump has supported for Senate and
Speaker 1: now he is putting him in his administration. Montana Republicans
Speaker 1: join Democrats to reject banning trans lawmaker from using women's restrooms.
Speaker 1: So what they're going to do is are going to
Speaker 1: allow the trainees in the women's restrooms in Montana, and
Speaker 1: it is a bipartisan move bipartisan because you know, we
Speaker 1: just need to be nice to people. Well, it's kind
Speaker 1: of interesting. John Piper, who's a well known writer Christian writer,
Speaker 1: he says, when somebody asked him a question, he gets
Speaker 1: questions and he gives his answers to him. Somebody asked
Speaker 1: him about what they called pronoun hospitality that's not hospitality,
Speaker 1: and he called it out for that. They asked him
Speaker 1: whether Christians should engage in the so called pronoun hospitality.
Speaker 1: He says, well, you need to understand. The ask is
Speaker 1: for a person to have the freedom in the movement
Speaker 1: to do this limited to evangelism contexts, limited to conversations
Speaker 1: with those who are not believers. If someone claims to
Speaker 1: be a follower of Christ, such pronoun hospitality would not apply,
Speaker 1: he said. However, he said, even though we're supposed to
Speaker 1: be hospitable, even though we're supposed to meet people where
Speaker 1: they are, we're not called to lie to people. Right,
Speaker 1: It's just that simple. The real simple ethics of this
Speaker 1: stuff still applies. He says. We ought not to be
Speaker 1: affirming of pronouns that designate a destructive choice and a
Speaker 1: false view of reality. That's what we're talking about here,
Speaker 1: he said, it is possible to be hospitable and also
Speaker 1: be honest. We don't reject the truth, so we can
Speaker 1: love somebody. We speak the truth with love and with humility,
Speaker 1: with mercy, but we don't ever reject the truth that's there.
Speaker 1: And yet that's the basis for what a lot of
Speaker 1: these churches do. And I talked yesterday about that twenty
Speaker 1: year old girl. She attended some church for quite some time,
Speaker 1: and she pleaded the fact that she was a regular
Speaker 1: church attendee, and so that made it okay for her,
Speaker 1: as a twenty year old, to make forty three million
Speaker 1: dollars selling her body on the site only fans. She said, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's just the way God made me. He gave me
Speaker 1: a great body, and I'm gonna I'm going to use that. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe she was attending this kind of church. This is Hillsong.
Speaker 1: This is their Christmas program. Folks, if you're going to
Speaker 1: church like this, run as fast as you can the
Speaker 1: other way. It's not just brink amateur night. This has
Speaker 1: nothing to do, nothing to do with Christ. This is
Speaker 1: their own vanity project. Name is just so sick of
Speaker 1: that I'm sick of the churches of the fog machines
Speaker 1: and everything else I have. I've not come across one
Speaker 1: of them, but my sons did told me about they're
Speaker 1: looking at churches in the area and they came across
Speaker 1: one that was a I think it was because it's
Speaker 1: close to university. They want to meet some people closer
Speaker 1: to their agent, fog machines, stuff like that. Anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's possible to tell people the truth. It's amazing. It's
Speaker 1: still out there. He says, also possible to engage with
Speaker 1: an individual, even one who identifies as transgender, without having
Speaker 1: to use a pronoun other than you. He said, I
Speaker 1: think using the word gender where the right word is sex,
Speaker 1: it's like using the word marriage for relationship between two
Speaker 1: men or two women that is not marriage. It's a mirage, right,
Speaker 1: And so when you play these language games, at some
Speaker 1: point you're deceiving them. You're lying to them, and you're
Speaker 1: lying to yourself if you think that you're helping anybody
Speaker 1: or them. You know, when we look at this full
Speaker 1: on attack and how they're coming in every direction. American
Speaker 1: Girl Dolls has now joined the Woke battle. She had
Speaker 1: another one of these projects that are there. And this
Speaker 1: is a new article that came out, but the writer
Speaker 1: of this, Anne Young, had talked about what was she
Speaker 1: saw at American Dolls three years ago. Nothing has changed.
Speaker 1: It did go viral. I remember when Karen and I
Speaker 1: were in Chicago. We went up there. I want a
Speaker 1: contest for so what was it called? What was the
Speaker 1: name of that organization called Freedom Works? Freedom Works, and
Speaker 1: it was Dick Army was the guy who started that.
Speaker 1: He's a former leader of the GOP at one point
Speaker 1: in time, and it was all about liberty and economics
Speaker 1: things like that. So they had a contest there do
Speaker 1: a video about entrepreneurship and and we won that. And
Speaker 1: part of that was getting a trip to Chicago, and
Speaker 1: we had a great time on segues.
Speaker 2: It was a blast.
Speaker 1: I could really I know, you look really stupid, and
Speaker 1: there's no existing pictures of either one of us on
Speaker 1: a segway, but we had a great time. We went
Speaker 1: to one of these places where they had a tour
Speaker 1: going and usually, but the particular day that we signed up,
Speaker 1: they didn't have anybody except the two of us, and
Speaker 1: so the guy who owned it was used that to
Speaker 1: train somebody else and so it was the two of
Speaker 1: us and then the owner and some person who was
Speaker 1: in training, and they pretty much just let us do
Speaker 1: whatever we want, and he's going around talking to them
Speaker 1: at where we go and that type of thing. Karen,
Speaker 1: I just all over the place, but it was a
Speaker 1: lot of fun. You just lean forward and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden you're going really fast, and with a wind
Speaker 1: in your face, it feels like you're going much faster
Speaker 1: than twelve miles an hour. Anyway, that's our remembrance of Chicago,
Speaker 1: along with the American Girl is we did some window
Speaker 1: shopping down the Miracle Mile thing. Karen went in there
Speaker 1: and we didn't have our daughter at the time, and
Speaker 1: she was really excited about getting some traditional dolls. Well,
Speaker 1: they're not traditional anymore. They've completely changed. The idea that
Speaker 1: a child may have been born in the wrong body
Speaker 1: or could possibly change their biological sex has no place
Speaker 1: in schools, and yet this is what's being pushed to
Speaker 1: them everywhere. It's not just the schools, but of course
Speaker 1: it's also entertainment, and it's even places like American Dolls.
Speaker 1: She said. Two years ago, in early December twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: I walked into an American Girl Doll Store on my
Speaker 1: daughter's birthday. Was shocked to see transactivism spelled out clearly
Speaker 1: in a book marketed to little girls between the ages
Speaker 1: of nine and twelve. It was called a Smart Girl's
Speaker 1: Guide to Body Image, and it taught girls how to
Speaker 1: seek out gender affirming care, including puberty blockers and the
Speaker 1: mutilation of their distinctly female anatomy. Infuriated by this, I
Speaker 1: pinned an op ed piece the title was American Girl
Speaker 1: wants to trans your Daughter. It went viral within a
Speaker 1: few hours after The Daily Mail picked up the story
Speaker 1: and going back to this original article what she said
Speaker 1: at the time, she said that she picked up one
Speaker 1: of these things and described what was in it. She said,
Speaker 1: I'm a mom of two real American girls, ages eight
Speaker 1: and ten. I recently went to the American Girl Store
Speaker 1: with my ear roll for birthday and was infuriated to
Speaker 1: find a Smart Girl's Guide Body Image book on their shelves,
Speaker 1: with explicit instructions on how girls can somehow change their sex,
Speaker 1: which of course is biologically impossible. What is especially insidious
Speaker 1: is that the body Image book actually begins with a
Speaker 1: noble theme, telling girls and how beautiful their bodies are
Speaker 1: and how they should embrace that beauty. That's the way
Speaker 1: Satan works, right, it's a comment work. They got to
Speaker 1: tell you the truth. First, they gain your confidence, then
Speaker 1: they come in for the kill, she said. However, the
Speaker 1: tone changes on the pages that are marked gender Joy.
Speaker 1: Contrary to what the first chapters appear to promote, the
Speaker 1: book starts teaching girls so they can destroy their girlhood.
Speaker 1: It causes girls to question the beauty of their bodies,
Speaker 1: even instructs them on how they can find help to
Speaker 1: change their bodies, including potentially mutilating themselves. The book mixes
Speaker 1: truth about embracing natural beauty with lies about denigrating their body.
Speaker 1: This is a toxic mixture that will only confuse them,
Speaker 1: and again it's targeted toward very young girls. On page
Speaker 1: thirty eight, the book promotes the use of puberty blockers
Speaker 1: by telling girls to seek them out from their doctor. Says,
Speaker 1: if you haven't gone through puberty yet, the doctor might
Speaker 1: offer medicine to delay your body's changes, giving you more
Speaker 1: time to think about your gender identity. That's not what
Speaker 1: it is at all, as this woman who is suing
Speaker 1: the doctors that those purbity blockers have their own permanent
Speaker 1: results of things that they do. They don't mention that
Speaker 1: these untested hormonal agents are completely experimental for use in
Speaker 1: treating gender confusion and are similar to the drugs that
Speaker 1: have been used to chemically castrate sex offenders. Later on,
Speaker 1: it says they cast down on a child's ability to
Speaker 1: trust the adults in their lives. The book tells girls
Speaker 1: that if you don't have an adult, you trust their
Speaker 1: organizations across the country that can help you. Turn the
Speaker 1: resources on page ninety five for more information. The sickening
Speaker 1: ideologies said undermines the most important relationships in a child's life.
Speaker 1: And now we don't just have the American doll stores
Speaker 1: which are circling the drain now because of this type
Speaker 1: of thing, but now we got artif Intelligence character AI.
Speaker 1: As I point out to you this last week, we've
Speaker 1: had several lawsuits now because this company character a character
Speaker 1: dot AI has driven one kid to suicide, tried to
Speaker 1: get another kid who is autistic, tried to get him
Speaker 1: to kill his parents. And of course they insinuate their
Speaker 1: way into the child's life build trust in the same
Speaker 1: way that this book does, but is far more dangerous.
Speaker 1: Parents and grandparents she said, are the ones who know
Speaker 1: their children and their grandchildren the best, who most deeply
Speaker 1: love them and want the best for them. Is an
Speaker 1: American Girl really suggesting that organizations know how to care
Speaker 1: for a child better than the child's family. Why yes,
Speaker 1: And that is the legacy of planned parenthood for quite
Speaker 1: some time, you know, to intervene between the child and
Speaker 1: their parents. The manipulation continues again as the book offers
Speaker 1: more suggestions. Parts of your body may make you feel uncomfortable,
Speaker 1: and you may want to change the way you look.
Speaker 2: That's okay, totally.
Speaker 1: You can appreciate your body for everything it allows you
Speaker 1: to experience and still want to change certain things about it.
Speaker 1: Taking together with the advice about how to obtain puberty blockers,
Speaker 1: it is not a leap to think that this is
Speaker 1: paving the way for a more invasive intervention. It sounds
Speaker 1: like they could be pushing girls to consider broader physical changes,
Speaker 1: such as amputating their healthy breasts. But see, that's what
Speaker 1: school is all about, she said. Families like mine go
Speaker 1: to the American Girls Store to purchase dollars, not to
Speaker 1: purchase gender ideology. What they're pushing on our girls is horrific.
Speaker 1: And it has to be stopped. And yet you may
Speaker 1: think that your child is going to school in order
Speaker 1: to learn reading, writing, and arithmetic, but it's the same thing.
Speaker 1: And even if your child is not going to school,
Speaker 1: even if you don't have any children whose school age,
Speaker 1: we are paying for this stuff. We're paying very high
Speaker 1: prices for what these public schools are doing to children.
Speaker 1: It is absolutely heinous and has got to stop. M Sellers,
Speaker 1: Our daughter had some American girl dolls, really sweet, but
Speaker 1: we had to stop buying them. It's so sad. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they usedpeak traditional types of things, like a little house
Speaker 1: on a prairie type of stuff. Brian, thank you for
Speaker 1: the tip. I appreciate that. And a Shay says, this
Speaker 1: is the power of suggestion. Little kids don't think about
Speaker 1: that sort of thing unless adults push it on them.
Speaker 1: Of course, a baby does not know that it's in
Speaker 1: the wrong body. How absurd that is. It's really ridiculous
Speaker 1: even adults. Again, the Navy seal that General Flynn pushed
Speaker 1: for all this transgender stuff. You know, Flynn was pushing
Speaker 1: him back in twenty fourteen and he's now detransition and
Speaker 1: he said they were able to do this to me
Speaker 1: as an adult Navy seal. Imagine what they can do
Speaker 1: to kids. He said, this is heinous. And guess what.
Speaker 1: General Flynn was the one who was pushing that stuff
Speaker 1: and pushing him to be a public spokesperson for it
Speaker 1: at the Pentagon. Yeah, we have a mass effect mental
Speaker 1: illness because of this type of thing. You're absolutely right. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 1: right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Wow, m Sellers. I had a neighbor girl come up
Speaker 1: to me last night to share her concern about her
Speaker 1: friend who thinks that she's a cat, you know, the furries, right,
Speaker 1: and that her parents feed her from bowls and everything.
Speaker 1: And this girl is in sixth girl. You know, I said,
Speaker 1: from the very beginning of this, I said, I think
Speaker 1: what this transgender stuff is about is about pedophilia, and
Speaker 1: that is still true, but it's about other things as well.
Speaker 1: You know, when you tell a kid that they have
Speaker 1: the maturity, you presume legally and so forth, that children
Speaker 1: have the maturity to mutilate their body permanently, which we've
Speaker 1: never done anything like that before. We've always protected minors
Speaker 1: from that. But if you accept that premise, and of
Speaker 1: course they can consent to sex, and that's what the
Speaker 1: pedophiles are always about. And keep them away, don't tell
Speaker 1: your parents. We're gonna, you know, isolate them from their
Speaker 1: parents and tell them that they have the ability to
Speaker 1: make these types of decisions. That's what this has always
Speaker 1: been about. But it's about something else, and I think
Speaker 1: this furry thing shows how they're trying very hard to
Speaker 1: get people to completely separate themselves from reality. They want
Speaker 1: everybody to live in this virtual world. And it is
Speaker 1: going to be possible if they put you on universal
Speaker 1: basic income and let you ready player one. You know,
Speaker 1: the Spielberg made that into a movie. But you know,
Speaker 1: you live in a little garage or something, and you've
Speaker 1: got your virtual reality that you can play with, and
Speaker 1: that is your world completely. And that's what they want
Speaker 1: to do. They want to separate us from reality. They
Speaker 1: want to separate us from each other. And again, that
Speaker 1: was one of the most insidious things about all this
Speaker 1: lockdown stuff that Trump laid the precedent for and moved
Speaker 1: the Overton window for a North American house. Hippo replies
Speaker 1: and said, I knew something was wrong over twenty years ago,
Speaker 1: when I was driving a Toronto City bus, a gentleman
Speaker 1: boarded holding a leash attached to a collar being worn
Speaker 1: by his female companion. Yeah, or maybe it'd be Sam
Speaker 1: Britton and it's attached to a male companion, you know,
Speaker 1: which is what he was all about. And he was
Speaker 1: also about children as well. By the way, as a
Speaker 1: follow up to all that, American Girl is now by Mattel.
Speaker 1: In the fourth quarter of twenty twenty two, American Girl
Speaker 1: took a seventeen percent revenue loss through the snowball effect
Speaker 1: of outrage because of them pushing transgender ideology. In twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, American Girl lost so much revenue almost ten
Speaker 1: percent compared to twenty twenty two, that Mattel reported a
Speaker 1: subsidiary change to American Girl's operational status their twenty twenty
Speaker 1: three fourth quarter report announced beginning the first quarter of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, Mattel's American Girl business is being integrated
Speaker 1: into its North American Commercial organization. As a result, American
Speaker 1: Girl will no longer be an operating segment. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: killed it, but you know they're killing I have no
Speaker 1: concern about that. It's the girls and the children that
Speaker 1: are being harmed with this. And this is a story
Speaker 1: from the Daily Mail that I thought was pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: This one says, I sacrifice my life for my career
Speaker 1: and I regret every minute of it. One woman's raw
Speaker 1: confession after finding herself childless and lost at forty, her
Speaker 1: life is not over. First of all, I mean Karen
Speaker 1: didn't have kids until nearly forty her first. You know,
Speaker 1: we got two at once, basically an adoption and a pregnancy.
Speaker 1: But it's not over at that point in time. But
Speaker 1: she said this, She said, most people who boast successful
Speaker 1: careers can pinpoint a single moment when they realize their
Speaker 1: ambition made a silent promise to themselves to achieve it.
Speaker 1: But for there was no come to Jesus moment there
Speaker 1: on her path to becoming a lawyer. Instead, she wanted
Speaker 1: to prove a point to a counselor who said, you
Speaker 1: can't be a lawyer, you're a woman. So that's what
Speaker 1: her whole life has been, to prove this guy who
Speaker 1: doesn't know her may not even still be alive, to
Speaker 1: prove that he doesn't know anything. And so she says
Speaker 1: she's working around the clock, sometimes working twenty three hours
Speaker 1: a day, reached total burnout. She says she now regrets
Speaker 1: every minute of her legal career that was by the
Speaker 1: world's standard successful. She said, in my mind, it would
Speaker 1: have felt like a complete failure if I quit or
Speaker 1: dropped out and I wanted to be successful. You know,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people in family members even
Speaker 1: who hated what they were doing, but they continued on
Speaker 1: because they had a degree in it. I've known people
Speaker 1: who did that because they were engineers. I've known people
Speaker 1: who did that because they were teachers. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: the degree, rather than being a stepping stone for you,
Speaker 1: was something that imprisoned them because of their expectations. So
Speaker 1: you know, when we look at the things that we
Speaker 1: tell ourselves and how we are, how we are setting
Speaker 1: ourselves up for failure. I've got I'm gonna take a
Speaker 1: quick break here because I've got to figure out where
Speaker 1: this next article is. I had to split things between
Speaker 1: two different devices. I have this old device that I
Speaker 1: was using, and the new one would not the WiFi
Speaker 1: would not work today, so I had to physically there's
Speaker 1: no way to physically put stuff on here. So I'm
Speaker 1: split between two different devices, and there's some stuff that
Speaker 1: I really wanted to talk about that just happened, But
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break, by the way,
Speaker 1: before we do, let me just play this for you
Speaker 1: because we got Joe Clint is going to be coming
Speaker 1: on before too much longer, and I wanted to play
Speaker 1: this about what is happening in Syria. We have a
Speaker 1: guy who is a Christian. He's very concerned about the
Speaker 1: fact that these head shoppers from al Qaeda have taken
Speaker 1: over in Syria.
Speaker 16: Do you know how sad there is when you see
Speaker 16: the endless support from the West to Isra and nothing
Speaker 16: to them and most thing Christians, no one cares about us.
Speaker 16: Mark Johnson, the House of Representedy was like the Bible
Speaker 16: teach us to stand with Usrael. Yeah, but what about us?
Speaker 16: The Christians in them indlies. But we are not refugees
Speaker 16: and we are not European. We are not convert convert
Speaker 16: or Muslim converted to Christianity. No, we are indigenous to
Speaker 16: the Lambs. We are the descendant of the empires, of
Speaker 16: the ancient empires of the Assyrians, where Bologians, Aramians, all
Speaker 16: these ancient civilizations. We are one of the first civilizations
Speaker 16: to accept Christianity in the first century, and we still
Speaker 16: speak the language that Jesus spoke. We are real Christians,
Speaker 16: real Semite.
Speaker 3: But what do we have?
Speaker 2: No support?
Speaker 16: No one cares about us. They have Islamist racticals coming
Speaker 16: all over the world supporting them killing my people.
Speaker 3: And what do we have as the Christians?
Speaker 16: Nothing morons killing each other in Ukraine, Russia and sending
Speaker 16: all their money supporting proxy wars and killing civilians in Israel,
Speaker 16: gas or whatever is dying. He's dying. We are pathetic.
Speaker 16: I swear, I'm just speechless. I don't know what they say.
Speaker 16: I'm very sad.
Speaker 1: Well. And of course they are cheering Trump along for
Speaker 1: the most part. That's all they see. They don't see
Speaker 1: any principles, they don't see any realities. Like Mike Johnson, right,
Speaker 1: we're gonna cheer for Netahu, We're gonna cheer for Trump.
Speaker 1: We're gonna put these politicians and our love for them
Speaker 1: as individuals, are going to put that above any principles
Speaker 1: that are very clearly out there. Thank you for the suggestion, Jason. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I turned believe me. I turned it on and off
Speaker 1: many times. I rebooted it. I did a hard shutdown.
Speaker 1: I turned the Wi FI on and off, not sure
Speaker 1: what's happening with it, but doesn't have any I got
Speaker 1: that's two months ago, and it's a much better fit
Speaker 1: for what I do than the other one. But and
Speaker 1: I haven't had any problems with it yet. But yeah,
Speaker 1: there's no way to actually physically get stuff into it.
Speaker 1: I found out for the first time today. Before we
Speaker 1: bring on Gerald, I wanted to talk about this particular.
Speaker 1: This is the article that I was looking for. The
Speaker 1: fact that Life Sight News is saying Trump must stop
Speaker 1: the horrific sale of apported baby body parts. And he's
Speaker 1: put a person there for civil rights who knows all
Speaker 1: about that. There was the defender of David de Lyden.
Speaker 1: And yet and they may get rid of planned parenthood funding.
Speaker 1: Why are we funding planned parenthood? Mike Johnson? Why'd you? Okay,
Speaker 1: that's because you set up these omnibus bills, And yet
Speaker 1: this is what needs to really be shut down. They
Speaker 1: talk about this in detail Life Site News. I mentioned
Speaker 1: it in the past. We know these babies, the body
Speaker 1: parts that they're taking, and they're taking organs. We know
Speaker 1: that they have to the babies have to be born alive,
Speaker 1: and they have to schedule this. They have to have
Speaker 1: the people that are going to take the organ right away.
Speaker 1: You don't cut an organ, use an organ out of
Speaker 1: a dead person. And so whether you're talking about somebody
Speaker 1: that's an organ donor or these other things, that is
Speaker 1: necessary that the person be alive. We've seen this in China.
Speaker 1: We know that that's the case testimony from doctors here
Speaker 1: in the US. But then there's this as well. In
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, a chillingn report titled how Aborted Children Are
Speaker 1: Used in Medical Research in twenty twenty was published by
Speaker 1: the National Catholic Register. A detailed laboratory practices at the
Speaker 1: University of Pittsburgh. We talked about this where the body
Speaker 1: parts of babies that were killed and second trimester pregnancy
Speaker 1: were used in horrifying mingala like experiments. One included grafting
Speaker 1: the scalps of aborted babies onto rats to create humanized mice.
Speaker 1: And so you can see soft little tufts of children's
Speaker 1: hair sprouting from the sides of the mice where the
Speaker 1: researchers had replanted it after scalping the babies and killing them.
Speaker 1: This is horrific stuff. Who was it that was running
Speaker 1: this well? This program was being done in twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: and we find this out because of discovery in the
Speaker 1: David delight In case. This is being run by the
Speaker 1: NIH led at the time by Francis Collins, a guy
Speaker 1: who is a hardcore evolutionist, but he identifies as a Christian,
Speaker 1: and he is as much a Christian as a man
Speaker 1: who says that he's a woman. All Right, it's absolutely amazing,
Speaker 1: he said. Even though he's troubled by abortion, he said,
Speaker 1: there are some aspects of fetal tissue that can be
Speaker 1: extremely valuable. And so he praised as he's been praised
Speaker 1: as a key voice on ethical issues by left wing
Speaker 1: self proclaimed Christians Russell meer Or and David French. They
Speaker 1: called him a national treasure. Despite his involvement in all this,
Speaker 1: abortion activists insists that the entire debate can be boiled
Speaker 1: down to a simple slogan, my body, my choice. Well,
Speaker 1: if that's the case, whose body parts are being shipped
Speaker 1: out to the government. Yeah, that was the amazing thing.
Speaker 1: We found out that it was Fauci and his people
Speaker 1: under Francis Collins, who were actually the customers for this
Speaker 1: heinous practice. Emails discussed tissue, fetal tissue like any other
Speaker 1: commodities such as sugar or rice, nonchalantly negotiating for fetuses
Speaker 1: up to twenty three weeks old from elective abortions. It's
Speaker 1: not even allowed to abort a baby after twenty four weeks.
Speaker 1: Even in the UK, just like we were talking about
Speaker 1: their prohibition of these childhood drugs, they prohibit aborting babies
Speaker 1: up to the point that our government was special ordering
Speaker 1: the prices. One of the pieces, what I should say,
Speaker 1: heavily redacted paper called the research Plan, was submitted to
Speaker 1: the University of California, San Diego Institutional Review Board and
Speaker 1: it was approved in twenty eighteen. They had scientists there
Speaker 1: wanted twenty five hundred fetuses from up to almost the
Speaker 1: sixth month month of gestation for experimentation. We will collect
Speaker 1: tissues from fetuses ranging from four to twenty three weeks
Speaker 1: gestational age from subjects undergoing elective surgery a surgical pregnancy
Speaker 1: termination at Planned Parenthood in San Diego. The contract between
Speaker 1: them and Planned Parenthood appears to follow Planned Parenthood to
Speaker 1: retain intellectual property rights relating to the fetal tissue, although
Speaker 1: it does not grant the University of California, San Diego
Speaker 1: the independent right to commercialize a tissue. You know, that's
Speaker 1: the other thing about our government now they're making money
Speaker 1: off of this stuff. And then finally, when we look
Speaker 1: at what a life really is, we have the abortion
Speaker 1: pill and an abortion pill murder by a man in
Speaker 1: the UK in twenty twenty two, forty year old student
Speaker 1: Warby ground up abortion pill and put it into his
Speaker 1: pregnant partner's orange juice. The Norfolk man then gave the
Speaker 1: victim a number of tablets of another abortion drug after
Speaker 1: using deception to engage in sexual activity with her while
Speaker 1: she was blindfolded. The woman, who has granted anonymity by
Speaker 1: law as a victim of a sexual offense, lost a
Speaker 1: fifteen week old child that she was carrying. As the
Speaker 1: UK Guardian pointed out, a callous and selfish man who
Speaker 1: gave abortion drugs to a pregnant woman without her knowledge,
Speaker 1: causing her to lose her unborn baby, has now been
Speaker 1: given a jail sentence of twelve years. The abortion limit
Speaker 1: on the UK is twenty four weeks, meaning that if
Speaker 1: the woman had legally aborted her child, the Guardian would
Speaker 1: have strenuously denied that she'd killed an unborn baby. We
Speaker 1: see this over and over again. You know, if you
Speaker 1: have a pregnant woman who's involved in some kind of
Speaker 1: a violent attack and the baby dies, they will charge
Speaker 1: the man with murder. You know, if he kills the
Speaker 1: mother and the baby, the two charges of murder. If
Speaker 1: just a baby, they'll still charge them with murder. And
Speaker 1: yet if she wants to, she can go down to
Speaker 1: a planned parenthood and kill the baby herself. This is
Speaker 1: this has always been the case that truly is insane.
Speaker 1: But the brief mother told the court in an impact
Speaker 1: statement read by the prosecutor that she has not been
Speaker 1: able to conceive again, despite visiting multiple fertility clinics. She said,
Speaker 1: this pain will never leave me, knowing that this baby
Speaker 1: could have been my only chance to be a mother
Speaker 1: in this lifetime. Being a mother was a dream to me,
Speaker 1: she said. She also told the court that she is
Speaker 1: haunted by the feeling that she failed to protect her baby. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I think Western society is going to be
Speaker 1: haunted by this, and I think we're going to be
Speaker 1: haunted by our callousness to war as well. You know,
Speaker 1: look at imagine when we talk about babies that can
Speaker 1: survive on their own, we talk about babies that are human,
Speaker 1: regardless of their level of development. What about when they've
Speaker 1: actually been born, about when they are toddlers, or if
Speaker 1: it's men, women and children who are innocent. You know,
Speaker 1: how do we justify that type of murder? And yet
Speaker 1: we do. We do justify it, and we do aid it,
Speaker 1: and we do work with terrorists to accomplish what their
Speaker 1: geopolitical objectives are. They don't care anymore about our lives
Speaker 1: than these bureaucrats in Bunkham County care about these people
Speaker 1: who have whose houses they're knocking down that were built
Speaker 1: for them by the Amish because they don't have plumbing
Speaker 1: and electrical they're going to shut them down, and they're
Speaker 1: going to force them into homeless centers and take everything
Speaker 1: away from them. That is what our government is doing
Speaker 1: to this, over and over again. Well, we've got Jeryl
Speaker 1: Clinty who's ready to go, and we're going to take
Speaker 1: a quick break and come right back up. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Doug a log, Thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: And so we're going to get that gas gauge up
Speaker 1: and it already is a little bit higher than the
Speaker 1: one quarter, so we're gonna get that up. But thank
Speaker 1: you so much. For the help. We're gonna take a
Speaker 1: quick break and Joel Centi is going to be joining us.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 4: I wish I had a Christmas Night album.
Speaker 5: You can get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow
Speaker 5: dot com for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 6: There was right in the second floor there.
Speaker 3: See what'd you wish? Jear it well, not just one wish,
Speaker 3: your whole hatful.
Speaker 5: First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase
Speaker 5: the Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas
Speaker 5: classics like are you gonna throw it up?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 9: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 10: Can't you come old?
Speaker 5: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 5: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and is
Speaker 5: all I'll be home for Christmas?
Speaker 3: What do you want?
Speaker 6: You want to moon? Just say the word and I'll
Speaker 6: throw a lass or und plow down.
Speaker 11: I'll take it away and then I'll buy you your
Speaker 11: own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 8: The problem in the Next States is about the whole
Speaker 8: political system. It's not about one person. Trump's election has
Speaker 8: proven again for us again and again that the president
Speaker 8: is only a performer. He's not the decision maker. He's
Speaker 8: part of different lolobbies and the deep states, or the
Speaker 8: deep regime as we can call it, who implement and
Speaker 8: dictate on the president what should he be doing. And
Speaker 8: the proof to what I'm what I'm saying that Trump
Speaker 8: after he became present, that he's followed most of the
Speaker 8: promises and the world that he was boosting during his campaign.
Speaker 8: He made one hundred eighty turn in nearly every promise.
Speaker 8: So why because the deep state wouldn't allow him to
Speaker 8: go in certain directions. That's why for me dealing with
Speaker 8: him as a person, it could be but can that
Speaker 8: person deliver? No, in the United States, president cannot deliver
Speaker 8: the whole state, the deep state only the one who
Speaker 8: can deliver.
Speaker 1: And this is the problem.
Speaker 8: This deep state doesn't accept partners around the world. They
Speaker 8: only accept puppets.
Speaker 1: Well, and again that's a side talking about what was happening.
Speaker 1: And you know, can't you work with Trump? Old Trump
Speaker 1: has been controlled by the deep state, and you can
Speaker 1: tell that because he's done a one to eighty degree
Speaker 1: turn from most of the things that he's said. I
Speaker 1: could talk to him, but he's not the one who's
Speaker 1: really making these decisions. He's being running. Boy, was that
Speaker 1: never more obvious than in Syria? Joining us now is
Speaker 1: Gerald Silenty. We're going to talk about this and go
Speaker 1: to talk about the economy as well. Jerald Slenty Trends Journal,
Speaker 1: And again, if you go there, you can get the
Speaker 1: excellent Trends Journal at ten percent off if you use
Speaker 1: the code night. Thank you for joining us, Joe, No.
Speaker 13: Thank you. Yeah, it's ten percent off, which brings it
Speaker 13: to two dollars and fifty cents a week. Or you
Speaker 13: could get the I can't say the proper word all
Speaker 13: Street Journal, but it begins with an S and an
Speaker 13: H and has an eye and another letter in it.
Speaker 13: This is the you're talking about what's going on in Syria?
Speaker 13: This is the front page of today. Five dollars a day,
Speaker 13: five dollars a day for this crap. I get the
Speaker 13: journal because I need economic data. The big story missing
Speaker 13: US citizen emerges in Syria.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well you.
Speaker 13: Look at this guy. It doesn't look like he's been
Speaker 13: missing much. He's in great shape. And now I'm paying
Speaker 13: for economic data, and you're shoving.
Speaker 17: This crap down my throat. Hey, how about the eighty
Speaker 17: eight Palestinians that were murdered yesterday by Israel? Why you
Speaker 17: anti semi? Israel could kill anybody.
Speaker 4: That they want.
Speaker 13: Yeah, how dare you talk about that? Not a word?
Speaker 1: Not a word in the le crap journal, the Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal, yep.
Speaker 13: And this is the toilet paper of record, the New
Speaker 13: York Times. They call themselves the paper a record, not
Speaker 13: an art here no more, no more printing of information.
Speaker 13: Now they just got big pictures because they fire all
Speaker 13: the all of the.
Speaker 1: The writers.
Speaker 13: Yeah, the writers.
Speaker 1: Well they're going to in the transition period to artificial intelligence,
Speaker 1: writ in the articles.
Speaker 3: Y Yeah.
Speaker 13: Russian troops close in on Key, hump in Ukraine, humbold
Speaker 13: in Syria. Putin may intensify pressure on Ukraine. You ready,
Speaker 13: man found in Syria appears to be missing American?
Speaker 17: Why are you telling me one damn guy out of
Speaker 17: eight billion people that may have been missing, and you're
Speaker 17: calling that news. Don't subscribe to the trans journal, subscribe
Speaker 17: to the toilet paper Record, Subscribe to the Wall crap Journal. Yeah,
Speaker 17: one lousy story after another. Here us and allies race
Speaker 17: to shape New Syria. Oh yeah, what right do we
Speaker 17: have to shape Syria?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 4: What right do we have?
Speaker 13: Oh?
Speaker 17: Why we have our soldiers there stealing oil in eastern Syria.
Speaker 17: We've been there since two thousand and eleven, rob in
Speaker 17: the oil. As I say, you think we would have
Speaker 17: invaded a rock if they had major ex what was broccoli?
Speaker 1: And you and I've been talking about this a long
Speaker 1: time about the pipelines. This is about wars over pipelines,
Speaker 1: just like we had nord Stream and the gas pipeline.
Speaker 1: They are you know, is Russia going to sell them
Speaker 1: gas or is the United States going to sell them gas?
Speaker 1: Same type of thing in Syria that that fight over
Speaker 1: that pipeline that's there.
Speaker 13: That's right. Iran was going to put a pipeline through
Speaker 13: because then they get right out to the Mediterranean. Yeah,
Speaker 13: and they stopped it from happening. And Turkey, United States
Speaker 13: and Israel. Here look, search continues for US journalist who
Speaker 13: is abducted in Syria in two thy and twelve. You're
Speaker 13: calling this news? Yeah, what what does this help me?
Speaker 3: Know?
Speaker 13: What in the world is going on? What it means
Speaker 13: and what's next? Nothing? And this is the only article
Speaker 13: they have about the Israeli genocide, and they blame the
Speaker 13: hamas Is. Records seized by Israel show Hamas was in
Speaker 13: a UN's school that they bombed to smithereens. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 13: that's the hospitals, schools, churches, mosques bombed to ruin genocide
Speaker 13: in front of everybody's eyes. Yeah, but nothing reported, nothing, nothing.
Speaker 1: And now a massive bombing campaign in Syria as well.
Speaker 13: Israel has wiped out over eighty percent, according to the
Speaker 13: data from Times of Israel, over eighty percent of serious
Speaker 13: military equipment, plus knocking out you know, all of their
Speaker 13: radar and all the other stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're starting to see you know. They said, well,
Speaker 1: we were attacked bying Ganza, so we got to attack
Speaker 1: them and keep attacking and keeps the killing civilians for
Speaker 1: over a year, and then you know there's been some
Speaker 1: attacks coming from Lebanon, so now we need to destroy
Speaker 1: that part of Lebanon. And now they're going into Syrian
Speaker 1: As they continue to do this, I guess most people,
Speaker 1: except for the media and the American government, most people
Speaker 1: will see see it for what it is, a big
Speaker 1: land grab and a power grab, and they don't care
Speaker 1: who dies, whoever gets in their way.
Speaker 13: Most people don't see anything. Yeah, now they would have
Speaker 13: happened to Taylor Swift last night. I mean, you know,
Speaker 13: they don't know. People don't have it. It's crazy they
Speaker 13: don't have it. It's like the Ukraine War. People don't
Speaker 13: know how it began. They don't know about the United
Speaker 13: States overthrow the democratically elected government of Victiyanakovich in two
Speaker 13: thoy and fourteen. Yeah, they don't know about what was
Speaker 13: a Victorian Newland speaking in December two thousand and thirteen.
Speaker 13: You could google it up saying that the United States
Speaker 13: has sent five billion dollars to non governmental organizations in Ukraine. Quote,
Speaker 13: teach them at democracy.
Speaker 1: That's how our democracy works. You can give money to
Speaker 1: politicians who keep it for their own personal use. That's it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's how it works.
Speaker 13: And so people don't have a clue what's going on.
Speaker 13: And it's very very heartbreaking. Again, what's going on to
Speaker 13: the Palestinian people. If there's no outrage at the bombing
Speaker 13: of this place, to ruin and Israel stealing more and
Speaker 13: more land every day. You know, I'm just thinking, you know,
Speaker 13: Christ wasn't born in Bethlehem. It's the West Bank's Merry Christmas. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 13: it's the West West West Bank. It's stolen land. And
Speaker 13: I'm tired of this fairy tale that God told Abraham
Speaker 13: three five hundred years ago that this land is your land.
Speaker 13: Is that the only person God ever spoke to?
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, you know, I think a lot of people
Speaker 1: misunderstand the promises that were made to him. And even
Speaker 1: the ultra Orthodox Jews who believe that they're going to
Speaker 1: get the land given to them don't support the way
Speaker 1: that Netanyahu and the government is doing that. And that's
Speaker 1: the key thing, regardless of what you think with this.
Speaker 1: You know, we don't interpret the you know, we don't
Speaker 1: interpret the Bible to contradict itself on basic moral principles.
Speaker 1: And that is what people are doing. They're throwing out
Speaker 1: these clear moral guidelines that have been the basis for
Speaker 1: just war, and they're excusing anything as long as it's
Speaker 1: done by a group that they identify with, a group
Speaker 1: that they like, or a politician that they like or
Speaker 1: identify with. And we see that with Netanyahu, we see
Speaker 1: it with Israel, we see it with their Publican party,
Speaker 1: you know, we see it with Trump, we see it
Speaker 1: with all this stuff. If they like the person. They
Speaker 1: don't care about morality anymore. It's just situational ethics. They
Speaker 1: don't really care.
Speaker 13: Now, this is what's going on over there, they should
Speaker 13: be outraged. That's beyond the belief and what's happening to
Speaker 13: these people. Could you imagine, could you imagine living there?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, when you look at it. There was an
Speaker 1: article on our tea this week that I thought it
Speaker 1: was good. They always use the term gerald of a
Speaker 1: rules based international order. They don't refer back to any
Speaker 1: morality from the Bible anymore, any of the people in
Speaker 1: the West. But they'll say we've got this rules based
Speaker 1: international order. They said, what a sham? This is who
Speaker 1: sets up these rules? The rules are always in the
Speaker 1: favor of NATO and the US when you look at
Speaker 1: what is going on, for example, as we've been talking
Speaker 1: about with Syria. You know, when the US goes in
Speaker 1: there and invades in Syria, even though Russia was there
Speaker 1: at the invitation of the government that was there and
Speaker 1: in compliance with the UN rules. Right, But that's not
Speaker 1: the international rule of order, not the UN or anything else.
Speaker 1: They said, So where are these rules coming from? Right,
Speaker 1: They're not coming from God. They're not coming from the
Speaker 1: un These people are just making this stuff as they
Speaker 1: go along. And they said, when you when you compare
Speaker 1: that to what to the criticism of what's going on
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. I mean, it is rank hypocrisy and uh
Speaker 1: and it's just a lot of jargon to give themselves
Speaker 1: an excuse to do whatever they wish. Yep.
Speaker 13: Really is that shall not cover thy neighbor's property. Oh
Speaker 13: that's aura huh yeah, oh, but you could cover You're
Speaker 13: stealing all that land now in Syria. That's all right?
Speaker 13: Oh God gave you that land too, right, that's in
Speaker 13: a good book, Chapter six, section eight. I mean, what
Speaker 13: are you stealing? Robbing killing? And you're selling it, but
Speaker 13: you're selling one line, but you forget the other one.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Selective, they're selective about what they want. When
Speaker 1: you look at our allies there, and I talked about
Speaker 1: this before Syria fell. You could see the the A
Speaker 1: ten warthogs, very effective weapon. Uh, that's used for close
Speaker 1: ground support of guess who Al Qaeda, the Mujahideen. I mean,
Speaker 1: when this guy takes power, this guy Jilani, when he
Speaker 1: takes power, Uh, he refers to himself and these others
Speaker 1: as mujia Haidin. That's what way this has been from
Speaker 1: the very beginning of all this stuff, when you had
Speaker 1: John McCain going around to Republican women's groups telling him, hey,
Speaker 1: you can adopt a moves right, and then they just
Speaker 1: keep changing the name, but it's always the same group
Speaker 1: that's there. They go from muja Hadeen to al Qaeda,
Speaker 1: to ISIS to al Nusra, and now they got this
Speaker 1: thing called hts Uh. It's just uh, it's we have
Speaker 1: engaged in piracy in Syria. We've engaged in an illegal
Speaker 1: invasion according to consistently applied rules. And yet you know
Speaker 1: this is something as you point out, all the mainstream
Speaker 1: media is cheering this on.
Speaker 13: Yep. Yeah, and you're talked about the muja Haden. Who
Speaker 13: created that? Who supported that? Oh that was Jimmy Conna.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it goes back along.
Speaker 13: Arrogant, arrogant guy Brazinski remember him. Oh, he was one
Speaker 13: of the one that's that does the clowns show with
Speaker 13: that the clown on MSNBC.
Speaker 1: What's your name, Yeah, Mika Brazensky. Yeah, yeah, I always
Speaker 1: talked about and his first name was the Big new
Speaker 1: He was the big News, the big news Prazensky, because
Speaker 1: I always met a big deal out of everything he
Speaker 1: had to say. But of course he goes back. He
Speaker 1: got put in that position of really running the Carter
Speaker 1: administration like Kissinger running the Nixon administration. He got in
Speaker 1: that position because of his Trilateral Commission stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: creating that and his idea of creating three regions that
Speaker 1: could then eventually be united. But he was also if
Speaker 1: you remember, between two Ages, he talked about the technocracy
Speaker 1: and he said, we're going to be able to tell
Speaker 1: what people want to do before they do it. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's describing all the stuff that's rolling out now and
Speaker 1: this form of digital slavery that they're trying to enforce
Speaker 1: on all of us. He was talking about that in
Speaker 1: the late nineteen sixties and early nineteen seventies. I didn't
Speaker 1: know that, Yeah, the technocratic age, but he called it
Speaker 1: between two ages, and so he said the technocratic aid,
Speaker 1: which is what's coming. And he'd talked about everything in
Speaker 1: the technocracy right now, this digital ID and CBDC and
Speaker 1: all the rest of these things.
Speaker 13: Wow, Yeah, I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: I loved that guy.
Speaker 13: Yeah, him and him and Kara brought us the Mujahadeen. Yeah,
Speaker 13: to fight the Russians in Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: Yep, that's right. Oh.
Speaker 13: Oh, Osama bin Laden. Oh that the one you mean,
Speaker 13: that Osama bin Laden that they killed, that they also
Speaker 13: supported to help over throw the government in Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 13: I got to tell you, Jimmy Carter, you know people
Speaker 13: do so slime ball. He's the guy, by the way,
Speaker 13: I'll never forget the guy's name, Alfred Khan, Khan it
Speaker 13: should have been Cone. It was a professor or something
Speaker 13: at Cornell University. The other ones that deregulated the airline industry.
Speaker 13: M and back then when I was a young man
Speaker 13: and I was flying first class, I was the number
Speaker 13: two guy running a trade association. Flying was fun. There
Speaker 13: was Allegany, there was Mowawk. There was what Eastern Pan
Speaker 13: American hundred or one hundred airlines in America. Yeah, they
Speaker 13: deregulated it, and now the Big Zone everything a couple
Speaker 13: of companies own it all, what two or three o
Speaker 13: all the airlines yep. And that's oh. He's also the
Speaker 13: guy that allowed interstate banking and did away with the
Speaker 13: usury laws. Back in the day, there were only intrast
Speaker 13: state banks. Bank of America was only in California.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, that's right.
Speaker 13: There was tens of oh what about fourteen fifteen thousand
Speaker 13: banks back then. Now they were like four thousand or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah, OK, at what has happened in so I tell you,
Speaker 1: it's just it's like organized crime. It's worse than organized crime.
Speaker 1: It's worse than the long loan sharks used to be.
Speaker 1: And then they don't pay you anything on the money
Speaker 1: that you have in the bank either. It's criminal, it
Speaker 1: really is.
Speaker 13: No, You're right, as I said, I if the politicians
Speaker 13: were Italian, they call it the mafia. Yeah, this is
Speaker 13: worse than the mafia. It is with thirty nine percent
Speaker 13: interest rates on some of these things.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, what is.
Speaker 13: The average now? About twenty three percent?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, that's right. Yeah. And of course what
Speaker 1: do they pay you, you know, like a fraction of
Speaker 1: one percent, teeny tiny amount. It's just they own everything,
Speaker 1: and they certainly own the politicians, and that's how they do.
Speaker 13: You know.
Speaker 1: We look at Elon musk I's talked about this earlier.
Speaker 1: Look at how much money he made he put in
Speaker 1: you know, two hundred and fifty million or whatever for
Speaker 1: Trump he's already made two hundred billion, and that's before
Speaker 1: the new rules kick in. You know, he's going to
Speaker 1: use it positions say it's efficiency, We're not going to
Speaker 1: give any subsidies to my competitors that I'm maxed out
Speaker 1: for EVS and you know all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 1: He's got a lot of things that uh, he talked
Speaker 1: about how you know, Trump has said if anybody invest
Speaker 1: a billion dollars, we're gonna get rid of all the
Speaker 1: environmental regulations for him and everything. He's like, yeah, let's
Speaker 1: do this. That's that's why he's going to make his money.
Speaker 13: Yeah, only if you invest a billion dollars, the rest
Speaker 13: of us can invest nothing. That we get, we get nothing.
Speaker 13: You got to beat the billionaires to invest a billion
Speaker 13: and the government will give you money.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. Yeah, the rest of us are
Speaker 1: not worth anything. We all used to always see this
Speaker 1: with the sports, uh stadiums. You know, you've got these
Speaker 1: billionaires who come in, they got multimillion dollar contracts with
Speaker 1: their players, you know, and uh, and then the rest
Speaker 1: of us have to pay for their stadium because you know,
Speaker 1: the small businesses are not essential, and we don't we
Speaker 1: don't do anything in terms of economic activity. It's only this, uh,
Speaker 1: this sports stadium that is going to make jobs and
Speaker 1: make money for the economy. All the mom and pops
Speaker 1: out there, they need to go out of business. And
Speaker 1: of course that was one of my other big pripes
Speaker 1: with Trump, was what he did to them. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's interesting. I saw an article from Roger Stone and
Speaker 1: he was dressing down Zelensky because Lensky didn't dress up.
Speaker 1: You know, he went to Notre Dame and he's wearing
Speaker 1: his standard khaki T shirt and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff that he's worn for several years, like he's
Speaker 1: some character off of Bonanza. He's got this one uniform
Speaker 1: that he wears day in and day out everywhere for
Speaker 1: three years. And Rogerstone was saying, how dare him show
Speaker 1: no respect whatsoever to this? And I thought, well, Roger,
Speaker 1: what is the appropriate attire for World War three? Is
Speaker 1: it formal? Is it semi formal? Actually we dressed for
Speaker 1: World War three. That's what we're really talking about here,
Speaker 1: but nobody wants to mention that, I guess. But it
Speaker 1: is amazing to me to see these terrorists and this group,
Speaker 1: this HTS group, is still listed by the State Department
Speaker 1: as a terrorist group while they're giving them air support
Speaker 1: with a ten warthogs and other things. They don't even
Speaker 1: try to hide it anymore.
Speaker 13: Yeah, the United States is bombing a Siri as well. Yeah,
Speaker 13: long with Turkey, that's right. Yeah, And now they're putting
Speaker 13: this group in and they're not going to like Israel
Speaker 13: very much. They're not going to be they're going to
Speaker 13: be more anti Israel than Asad was.
Speaker 1: Well, they were very complementary at this point. But we'll
Speaker 1: see what happens down the road, you know. And of
Speaker 1: course I'm reminded that Israel put in Hamas because they
Speaker 1: wanted a more radical group there. They thought it would
Speaker 1: make it easier for them to do what they wanted
Speaker 1: than if they had moderates, and so they pushed for
Speaker 1: the more radical group Hamas in Gaza. So you know,
Speaker 1: this is the geopolitical games that these people play, and
Speaker 1: they don't care anything about our lives. They don't care
Speaker 1: about the lives of innocent people, and they don't care
Speaker 1: about the line of their own people either. Let's talk
Speaker 1: a little bit about what's going on with the economy,
Speaker 1: because we're getting here to the end of the year,
Speaker 1: and you know, what do you think about gold, bitcoin,
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff where you think is
Speaker 1: going to happen with the tariffs? What is your economic
Speaker 1: forecast as we're looking at the end of the year.
Speaker 13: Here, it's a wild card with Trump. I mean, he
Speaker 13: says one thing and does another. You know, some taris
Speaker 13: is put through, others he didn't. Our forecast is that
Speaker 13: the equity markets will do They'll do relatively well next
Speaker 13: year because Trump will do everything he can to keep
Speaker 13: boosting up the economy because he's invested into it. And
Speaker 13: you look at the facts. Let's go back. We're in December. Now,
Speaker 13: let's go back to December twenty eighteen. I know that's
Speaker 13: ancient history for a lot of people. The equity markets
Speaker 13: were at their worst level in that December from any
Speaker 13: December since the Great Depression nineteen thirty one. That's how
Speaker 13: bad the equity markets did in twenty eighteen. What did
Speaker 13: Trump do? He pressured your own power to lower interest rates.
Speaker 13: In January, Powell lowed interest rates artificially boosted up the
Speaker 13: markets again. The economy was getting weak, and what happened
Speaker 13: other Repo crisis in September of twenty nineteen. Yeah, Trump
Speaker 13: will do everything he can to pump up the economy everything,
Speaker 13: and so we see it positive for the equity markets.
Speaker 13: On the bitcoin numbers. You know, we've been bullished for
Speaker 13: bitcoin for many years and we're very bullish on it
Speaker 13: because you know, he's in the game and do we
Speaker 13: know if he's invested in it or not. And he
Speaker 13: brought people in that are pro crypto into his government.
Speaker 1: And they're very invested in it. I mean, you look
Speaker 1: at all the people around him that are anything that
Speaker 1: has to do with any of the financial aspects of
Speaker 1: they're all heavily involved in crypto and stable coin and tokenization,
Speaker 1: all of that stuff.
Speaker 4: Yep.
Speaker 13: So it's you know, you got to look for what
Speaker 13: it is now for what you want. Yeah, and so
Speaker 13: we see it again. You know, we're talking talking about Musk.
Speaker 13: He gave him two hundred and fifty million dollars. Well,
Speaker 13: he's worth almost a trillion dollars. That's like, that's like
Speaker 13: even a big leaving a big tip at a restaurant.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you have that kind of money exactly, exactly, no.
Speaker 13: Money at all, Yeah, nothing, But the point being, look
Speaker 13: at all the billionaires that Trump is brought into his team.
Speaker 2: M hm.
Speaker 13: The billionaires have it. They could speak, they could say
Speaker 13: anything that they want. We have no right to say
Speaker 13: anything or be involved in any decision making. We are
Speaker 13: pieces of nothing. Crap. Yeah, it's only by the way,
Speaker 13: it's fascism. According to an Italian guy at All Line
Speaker 13: called Mussolini, the merger of state and corporate powers. By definition,
Speaker 13: the corporate powers run the government. You want to run
Speaker 13: for president, I'm Kamela hilarious. I got what two point
Speaker 13: three or four billion dollars? Hey, I'm Trump. I only
Speaker 13: got one point four billion billion, yeah, billion. It's not
Speaker 13: a it's not a democracy. You want to run for
Speaker 13: any office, you don't have the money behind you, you
Speaker 13: don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 13: And this is right in front of everybody's eyes. It's
Speaker 13: it's another it's it's the robber barons. It's nothing has changed,
Speaker 13: it's only gotten worse because once upon a time they
Speaker 13: used to be as you remember, we talked about this before,
Speaker 13: stationary stores, hardware stores, grocery stores, stores, shoot stores, all chains. Yeah,
Speaker 13: change zone everything, changezone everything. And by the way, people
Speaker 13: forget this too. That's why they wanted all the cheap
Speaker 13: labor coming in here, the immigration. You go to any
Speaker 13: one of these stores, watch what I mentioned, all the chains,
Speaker 13: the lows, the marshals, every time you walk in the door.
Speaker 13: Help want it full time, part time because they don't
Speaker 13: pay the people anything.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, I agree. And so they're going to
Speaker 1: have this very public, probably combative you know TV footage
Speaker 1: about how they're throwing immigrants out and everything, while in
Speaker 1: the back door they're bringing in all the people, the
Speaker 1: H one b VSA's and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 1: giving them green cards if they even got a college degree.
Speaker 1: So there's going to be this type of thing. There's
Speaker 1: going to be a lot of professional wrestling fights and
Speaker 1: yelling and screaming between Home and these Democrat cities, while
Speaker 1: very quietly they're going to be bringing them in in
Speaker 1: massive numbers in a different way than Biden did.
Speaker 13: Yep.
Speaker 1: Yeah, everything that happens is that way.
Speaker 13: Yeah, you know, by the way, I support tariffs, and
Speaker 13: I'll tell you why, because once upon a time, going
Speaker 13: back to the late eighteen hundreds early nineteen hundreds, the
Speaker 13: money that came in for the government came in through tariffs,
Speaker 13: not taxes. That's right, they invented the tariff, the tax thing,
Speaker 13: that slimeball maybe rotten Hell wood Row Wilson who gave
Speaker 13: us the Federal Reserve, Federal income tax, the IRS, and
Speaker 13: World War One.
Speaker 1: And that's why, you know, they called the Internal Revenue Service,
Speaker 1: because our revenue for the federal government was almost all external,
Speaker 1: came from other countries, and that allowed this to be
Speaker 1: essentially a free trade zone. Jefferson said when his second
Speaker 1: inaugural address, he said, well, I've been able to eliminate
Speaker 1: all useless offices, and by doing that, no farmer, no labor,
Speaker 1: no mechanic knows the tax man. We've eliminated all internal taxes.
Speaker 1: And it pretty much ran that way. But you know,
Speaker 1: once they made the shift to globalism, they wanted to
Speaker 1: have free trade in internal taxes and that's and that's
Speaker 1: what they've done. So yeah, that's that's an important thing.
Speaker 1: But the difficulty is how do we switch it and
Speaker 1: how do we wind up not paying the You know,
Speaker 1: we're still going to have this army of eighty thousand
Speaker 1: IRS agents, and we're still going to be growing the
Speaker 1: IRS to be seven times bigger than it is today.
Speaker 1: And I don't see anybody on the Republican side talking
Speaker 1: about cutting that back. But we know that the tariffs
Speaker 1: are going to add taxes to us, you know, And
Speaker 1: that's always been the thing. If we change the form
Speaker 1: of taxation, even if they went from an income tax
Speaker 1: to a consumption sales tax, the dangers that you always
Speaker 1: wind up getting both of them rather than changing one
Speaker 1: out for the other one. What do you think about that?
Speaker 1: And what do you think the economic consequences of these
Speaker 1: terrorists if Trump does them? How's this? How do you
Speaker 1: think that's going to transition?
Speaker 13: Well, let's go back to the beginning of the Ukraine War.
Speaker 13: Was it February twenty fourth, twenty twenty two. Biden and
Speaker 13: the West put serious sanctions on Russia. Quote Putin's going
Speaker 13: to pay the price. They didn't pay the price. We said,
Speaker 13: Russia has the human and natural resources they need to
Speaker 13: be self sustaining. These are very advanced people technologically and scientifically,
Speaker 13: and again it's a huge country. They have the natural
Speaker 13: resources as well. Look what happened to Russia's economy. It
Speaker 13: went up, they became self sustaining. All the companies that
Speaker 13: left the Russian people took over the country. Companies on
Speaker 13: McDonald's left that will take over there. We'll call it
Speaker 13: something else. We all all they just took over these
Speaker 13: businesses they I guess, So now the United States has
Speaker 13: all of what we need to be self sustaining. Once
Speaker 13: upon a time, as you remember, there used to be things,
Speaker 13: you know, made in America.
Speaker 1: Yeah all, we're up.
Speaker 13: In Syracuse corning all the all the places right here
Speaker 13: in in in Kingston shirt factory had shirt factories all
Speaker 13: over the place over here, and so oh there was
Speaker 13: there was a thing. Now they call it the rust belt. Yeah,
Speaker 13: used to be manufacturing. We need to bring manufacturing back
Speaker 13: to this country. Here. Just show you the hypocrisy again.
Speaker 13: I grew up at the height of the Vietnam War.
Speaker 13: We got to get those dirty commies before we don't
Speaker 13: stop them, those dominoes are going to keep falling, and
Speaker 13: before you know it, those communes will take over age.
Speaker 13: That was the line being sold. Vietnam still run by
Speaker 13: the communes. That's our's second largest importer. But we import
Speaker 13: clothing and shoes from Vietnam, the second largest country that
Speaker 13: we buy shoes and clothing from. But they taught us
Speaker 13: to hate those commies to go to war.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, And it was never about the Domino thing,
Speaker 1: you know it was, McNamara said before he died, he
Speaker 1: was interviewed in a documentary and he said he went
Speaker 1: back and the guy slammed his fist on the table
Speaker 1: and said, don't Domino theory. Don't you know anything about
Speaker 1: our history? For a thousand years have been in conflict
Speaker 1: with the Chinese. And now as you point out that
Speaker 1: it's a you know, an independent country that is manufacturing art,
Speaker 1: they're still having conflicts with the Chinese.
Speaker 13: Yep, yeah, yeah, McNamara, page.
Speaker 17: Nine.
Speaker 13: Hold on, and this is from my book Trends two thousand,
Speaker 13: which was an international bestseller. Here we go, Robert McNamara
Speaker 13: now states that quote, we were terribly wrong. Here it
Speaker 13: is nineteen ninety five book in Retrospect, The Tragedy and
Speaker 13: Lessons of Vietnam. Former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara finally
Speaker 13: revealed what an entire generation and known for thirty years,
Speaker 13: that our quote, democratic government foisted the Vietnam War upon
Speaker 13: the public, knowing full well that that Vietnam posed no
Speaker 13: threat to our national security, and that quote, the war
Speaker 13: was wrong, terribly wrong, and could not be won anyhow.
Speaker 13: Robert M. Macnamara now states we are terribly wrong. He
Speaker 13: should be tried as a war criminal. His dogmatic policies
Speaker 13: resulted in the most terrible tragedy this country has suffered
Speaker 13: since the Civil War. We called for a tribunal for Bosnia,
Speaker 13: why not for Macnamara. Yeah, Macnamara ranks with Hitler and
Speaker 13: Stalin as the perpetrator of crimes against humanity. Curtis D.
Speaker 13: West Fall, retired Air Force Colonel Austin Texas, led it
Speaker 13: to the editor USA Today for eleven ninety five. Yeah,
Speaker 13: wrote about it my book excellent.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And you know when he did that documentary, as
Speaker 1: you're pointing out, he deserved to be tried as a
Speaker 1: war criminal, and he kind of referred he kind of
Speaker 1: tried to give himself some legal cover by saying that
Speaker 1: when you look at Dresden, so many people died in Dresden. Dresden,
Speaker 1: he said, the fire bombing there. He said, if we'd
Speaker 1: lost that war, we would have been tried as war criminals.
Speaker 1: So he goes, yeah, what we did in Vietnam was bad,
Speaker 1: but not nearly as bad as what we did in
Speaker 1: World War Two type of thing, right, trying to buy
Speaker 1: some time there, but you know, when we talk about
Speaker 1: this domino theory, what do we hear the argument for
Speaker 1: this continued war in Ukraine all the time from the US,
Speaker 1: from the UK from France. It's a domino theory. And
Speaker 1: it's not a domino theory. This is this internal struggle
Speaker 1: that's been there between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine was part
Speaker 1: of Russia as long as the United States has been
Speaker 1: in existence, and so it's this ethnic conflict that is
Speaker 1: really a part of that area. And we went in
Speaker 1: there with the coups and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 1: But now they're back to this same thing about the
Speaker 1: domino theory. It's like, I've heard this all my life.
Speaker 1: This is the lie that they always resort to.
Speaker 13: Yep, yeah, truly's the same thing with the Middle East.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, Well, you know, you're talking about manufacturing, and
Speaker 1: I've said this before. I unless they get rid of
Speaker 1: this green agenda, we're not going to have any manufacturing
Speaker 1: and all be in China. And that's really I think
Speaker 1: what the purpose of this was. You go back to
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, the Paris Climate Accord, which is a treaty
Speaker 1: that was never ratified. But you know, Trump pretends and
Speaker 1: everybody else pretends. Even all the people in the Senate,
Speaker 1: not one senator came up and said, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: we have a say in this. None of them have
Speaker 1: said that, Republican or Democrat. But when you look at
Speaker 1: what is happening, I reported yesterday China is adding two
Speaker 1: coal power plants a week, and they've already got forty
Speaker 1: eight percent of the world's coal power plants. And yet
Speaker 1: Biden has got a plan to get rid of eighty
Speaker 1: percent of our remaining coal power plants in the next
Speaker 1: five years. We got about two hundred of them, and
Speaker 1: he's going to get rid of eighty percent of them
Speaker 1: in the next five years. If we don't do something
Speaker 1: about that, we're going to be in the same situation
Speaker 1: as the UK and other places in Europe where they
Speaker 1: have they can't afford to manufacture anything because their price
Speaker 1: of energy is so high. I mean to me, that's
Speaker 1: the fundamental thing. And yet you know when you talk
Speaker 1: about when Trump talks about the teriffs, I look at
Speaker 1: it and I say, I just see an additional tax coming.
Speaker 1: I don't see any focus on what the true problem is.
Speaker 1: He says, drill, baby, drill, Well, that's not the issue.
Speaker 1: You know, you can drill, but if you don't get
Speaker 1: rid of the Paris Climate Accord, they're not going to
Speaker 1: let you use it. So again it's it's just misdirection
Speaker 1: and a big con I think, is what this is
Speaker 1: all looking like to me.
Speaker 13: You know, you talk about burning coal, burning oil. If
Speaker 13: there's a quote, by the way, they just passed the
Speaker 13: bill nine hundred billion dollars more for the military industrial complex,
Speaker 13: almost a trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 13: Yeah, and Trump is going to keep as they're cutting
Speaker 13: government jobs, they're going to keep promoting the military industrial
Speaker 13: complex to get bigger.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 13: Here, remember this quote, and again it goes back to
Speaker 13: what you're talking about, because we could be going in
Speaker 13: a different direction. Every gun that is made, every warship launched,
Speaker 13: every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense of theft
Speaker 13: from those who hunger and are not fed, those who
Speaker 13: are cold and not clothed. The world in arms is
Speaker 13: not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of
Speaker 13: its labors, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of
Speaker 13: its children. This is not a way of life at
Speaker 13: all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war.
Speaker 13: It is humanity hanging on a Cross of Iron, Dwight
Speaker 13: the Eyes and how a five star general, Supreme Community,
Speaker 13: the Allied Forces and to turn president. So let's take
Speaker 13: one thing that he said here the genius of the scientists.
Speaker 13: If we were spending a trillion dollars a year on
Speaker 13: a new science to develop a new energy that was
Speaker 13: truly clean and truly safe, we'd have had it forty
Speaker 13: years ago.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Or if somebody developed it forty years ago, they
Speaker 1: would suppress it.
Speaker 13: It would have got rid of it. Tesla, the real guy,
Speaker 13: what was his.
Speaker 1: Name, Mikola Tesla, Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 13: So what I'm saying, the money isn't going into this, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 13: we don't have to be burning. It could be something
Speaker 13: that's totally different.
Speaker 1: Yeah oh yeah, oh absolutely, But.
Speaker 13: The money's not going to it. The money's going to
Speaker 13: hell because we keep them. And that's the truest word.
Speaker 13: Our money is going to hell. They're stealing our money
Speaker 13: to go kill people all over the world.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 13: And again I launched occupy piece so it's not just words.
Speaker 13: I put my money with my heart and soul aar.
Speaker 13: And by the way, how you gave two hundred and
Speaker 13: fifty million dollars to Trump, how about giving two hundred
Speaker 13: and fifty million dollars to occupy piece Tesla.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right, Or even just give a little
Speaker 1: bit of money to the people in western North Carolina.
Speaker 1: I talked about it earlier. Gerald. They got people who
Speaker 1: are freezing to death there, and they've got the local
Speaker 1: officials who came in and they're tearing down the houses
Speaker 1: that the Amish built for them because they don't have
Speaker 1: running water or electricity. But they're not going to have
Speaker 1: it when they have the house torn down either. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just what our government is doing is just directed
Speaker 1: against us. You know, Mike Johnson can't do anything at
Speaker 1: all to help these people in western North Carolina, and
Speaker 1: yet he just passed nearly eight trillion dollars for war.
Speaker 1: This is this is so typical. It's typical of both
Speaker 1: of these parties. They have nothing but contempt for the
Speaker 1: American people. They've got their own agenda of their a
Speaker 1: little geopolitical agenda and to redraw the lines on the
Speaker 1: map and to be able to boss people around. They
Speaker 1: don't care how many people they kill, including their own people,
Speaker 1: how many of them die. That's that's what's really involved here.
Speaker 1: I got a comment here, Colomos. I guess so we
Speaker 1: pronounce the name. Sorry, I don't know how to pronounce that,
Speaker 1: he says. Tell Gerald Slinty saw his picture hanging at
Speaker 1: the National University of Health Sciences in Lombard, Illinois when
Speaker 1: I walked in. He's a huge health guy. So there
Speaker 1: you go. Did you know that they had picture there?
Speaker 13: Oh? I didn't know that. But they gave me an
Speaker 13: honorary doctorate. Oh wow, because of the work I've done
Speaker 13: in integrative and natural healing, integrative and complimentary medicine.
Speaker 3: Here.
Speaker 13: This is one of the first books I worked on
Speaker 13: well natural healing back in the nineteen eighties, when people
Speaker 13: weren't talking about that. That's so nice to hear that. Yeah,
Speaker 13: they were wonderful to me. Yeah and yeah, and again
Speaker 13: we talked about Yeah, rememberable. It is very important. Least
Speaker 13: pay attention. Don't forget when you mass debate, don't forget
Speaker 13: to sanitize your hands. Remember that.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, remember that everybody had hand sanitizer everywhere. We
Speaker 1: had a fire I think somewhere, because that stuff is
Speaker 1: pretty volatile and flammable and that big storage of that,
Speaker 1: but not as bad as lithium and.
Speaker 13: I don't want to catch COVID from you because it's
Speaker 13: going around again. So I got to put this on
Speaker 13: because you know, he could come through the microphone and
Speaker 13: kill me.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, they're ramping this stuff up, and it
Speaker 1: looks like they're targeting raw milk. I think that targeting
Speaker 1: of raw milk is really about targeting local food production
Speaker 1: in general. What do you think?
Speaker 13: Yeah again, they've knocked out that it don't look who
Speaker 13: Yeah again. I wrote about it in this book Trends
Speaker 13: two thousand, how the bigs took over all of the
Speaker 13: farming industry, Tyson's and all these other companies. Look at it.
Speaker 13: I don't eat that crap. And again I'm talking about
Speaker 13: with natural healing. There was never a word, not one
Speaker 13: word from the prostitutes who sold the COVID JEB about
Speaker 13: getting in the best health you can, about taking vitamins
Speaker 13: and supplements.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 13: I only go out to eat when I go out
Speaker 13: on a date or with buddies, you know, friends, you know.
Speaker 13: But I don't go out to restaurants. I don't want
Speaker 13: to eat that stuff, you know. I only eat you know,
Speaker 13: organic foods, and I'm very careful where like, for example,
Speaker 13: if I go and I always read the label on
Speaker 13: the organic. Oh it comes from Oh, these grapes come
Speaker 13: from Peru. The grapes are call you organic. They come
Speaker 13: from Peru. How long does it take to get the
Speaker 13: grapes from Peru in New York? How old do these say?
Speaker 1: They're aged? They're just about to become wine when you
Speaker 1: get them right.
Speaker 13: And I eat seasonally too, I don't. I won't eat
Speaker 13: lettuce in the middle of the winter. Where the lettuce
Speaker 13: come from? You go out, when you grow your own lettuce,
Speaker 13: you pick it, it's dead within five minutes if you
Speaker 13: don't put it in, you know, in the refrigerator, puts
Speaker 13: some water, clean it. And you mean, now you're telling
Speaker 13: me I'm eating lettuce in the middle of the winter.
Speaker 13: How do they keep this stuff alive for so long
Speaker 13: as they shifted from wherever they shifted from? So well,
Speaker 13: I eat organic, you know it's it's very careful of
Speaker 13: what I buy. And by the way, the I don't
Speaker 13: know how people could afford it. I mean I bought
Speaker 13: some I bought some grapes and a couple of this
Speaker 13: and that, all of a sudden, like fifty five dollars.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh, yeah, oh price the groceries just through
Speaker 1: the roof. Now, let me ask you this, because I
Speaker 1: know that you know, you support RFK Jr. And then
Speaker 1: his position on Israel, you unsupported him. What do you
Speaker 1: think now? Do you think that he's uh, you know,
Speaker 1: My take on it was I thought Trump was kind
Speaker 1: of leading him along and that maybe you know, that
Speaker 1: kind of sabotage his appointment. You think he's going to
Speaker 1: make it? And do you think that if he makes it,
Speaker 1: he's going to make a difference with any of the
Speaker 1: food or with any of the vaccine stuff? What do
Speaker 1: you think about that?
Speaker 2: How do you read?
Speaker 1: You will?
Speaker 13: I think he will, and you know, and there's some
Speaker 13: positive things. I said, you know, you know, I don't
Speaker 13: like Trump as a person and I don't support him.
Speaker 13: I wouldn't vote for him, but there are things if
Speaker 13: he follows through with him Again, as you said, I
Speaker 13: stopped supporting Kennedy and I spoke with him and I
Speaker 13: had Denis cacinichup here, as you know, as one of
Speaker 13: the speakers who was his campaign manager, and I stopped
Speaker 13: supporting him because of his stance on the war. And
Speaker 13: now with Trump on the war, he just came out
Speaker 13: with the Time magazine. The big deal. He's the man
Speaker 13: of the who reached Time magazine anymore?
Speaker 1: Well, so was Adolf Hitler. Maybe they're trying to send
Speaker 1: us a book. But anyway, I mean, their Man of
Speaker 1: the Year can be anybody that affected the news, you know.
Speaker 13: But Trump came out and said that he wants peace,
Speaker 13: and he said he wants peace in the Middle East.
Speaker 13: They asked him about do you trust Netta? He said,
Speaker 13: I don't trust anybody. And he said, he said, I
Speaker 13: don't want to see the Palestinians or the Jewish people killed.
Speaker 13: I don't want to see the Russians of the Ukrainian
Speaker 13: people killed. And so if he lives by his word
Speaker 13: and has peace, boy, I'll totally pro Trump. Yeah, But
Speaker 13: will he live by his word because now he's saying
Speaker 13: I just came out of the Wall Street Journal today
Speaker 13: actually about him possibly bombing Iran there's nuclear facilities, yeah,
Speaker 13: oh yeah, yeah, anything to do that, And how you're
Speaker 13: going to talk about peace?
Speaker 1: He'll say anything to anybody.
Speaker 14: My uh.
Speaker 1: My, my Trump bs meter is fully pegged all the
Speaker 1: way as full as it will go. I don't believe
Speaker 1: the thing the guy says about anything you know, if
Speaker 1: it comes out, great, I'll be happy to congratulate him
Speaker 1: for it. But right now we're in this kind of
Speaker 1: weird honeymoon period where everybody is able to project whatever
Speaker 1: they want to on him and and every and that's
Speaker 1: what they're doing. You know, everybody takes whatever he says
Speaker 1: that they like and they're projecting it on him, and
Speaker 1: you know, there's there's reality check. And of course there
Speaker 1: really won't be much of a reality check I think
Speaker 1: once he becomes president, because look at all the stuff
Speaker 1: that he's gotten away with. He's the father of the Jab,
Speaker 1: he still loves all that stuff. So there's there's going
Speaker 1: to be so many people are going to be covering
Speaker 1: for him with all of this stuff in the media.
Speaker 1: I just we'll just have to wait and see how
Speaker 1: it turns out. What do you think of this guy
Speaker 1: who was the who worked with sorrows to break the
Speaker 1: Bank of England. Bessant's going to be his treasury secretary.
Speaker 1: What do you think that is going to happen to
Speaker 1: the dollar in the next few years. Are they going
Speaker 1: to completely trash it and try to move into some
Speaker 1: kind of a you know, a cryptocurrency. A lot of
Speaker 1: people talking about using bitcoin as a reserve. Even Russia
Speaker 1: is talking about using bitcoin as a reserve. But what
Speaker 1: do you see the dollar and these types of things
Speaker 1: the dollar.
Speaker 13: It all depends where the dollar goes, depends on what
Speaker 13: they do with interest rates and a story, and they
Speaker 13: go to low interest rates apparently next week by twenty
Speaker 13: five basis points. And we believe that Trump is going
Speaker 13: to continue to push to lower interest rates because he
Speaker 13: wants to boost the economy up. Very important to also understand,
Speaker 13: the lower interest rates go, the higher inflation's going to go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 13: So that's the other side of it. And on a
Speaker 13: digital currency, absolutely, absolutely positively, that's the future. It was
Speaker 13: one of the covers of our Trends journal, and again
Speaker 13: you could get it by going to your link there
Speaker 13: you get ten percent office two dollars and fifty cents
Speaker 13: a week. One of the covers was from dirty Cash
Speaker 13: to Digital Trash. We're looking at a real numbers by
Speaker 13: the way of the United States debt, when you put
Speaker 13: in like social Security, all the other stuff they have
Speaker 13: to pay out, it's about two hundred and sixty trillion dollars,
Speaker 13: not thirty six trillion. There's no way in the world
Speaker 13: that they're ever going to pay this debt off. They're
Speaker 13: going to make up a digital currency. They're going to
Speaker 13: make up something like the Russians hacked out a banking system.
Speaker 13: You lost, still he your money, but don't worry about it.
Speaker 13: We're coming up with a new coin and the people
Speaker 13: will accept it because the country, the world has gone digital.
Speaker 13: It's been digit everybody's digitized everything, little kids, little infants,
Speaker 13: playing with the little you know.
Speaker 1: It's I think that's a big part of what we
Speaker 1: see coming up with the Trump administration. He's got all
Speaker 1: these pro crypto people. You know, it's kind of a
Speaker 1: you know, a controlled two step process here with the
Speaker 1: Sagelian dialectic. You know, you got uh Biden who will
Speaker 1: come at them directly and I'm going to ban everything,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to force you to do this and
Speaker 1: force you to then they pull back and with crypto
Speaker 1: or even with the climate stuff. I think that that
Speaker 1: Trump is going to pull back on a on of
Speaker 1: these Biden mandates and say, hey, you can do anything
Speaker 1: that you want. Of course, you may have to pay
Speaker 1: carbon tax or you may have to pay for carbon sequestration.
Speaker 1: That my buddies are running and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff. Or when it comes to crypto, he say, hey,
Speaker 1: you can have anything that you want out there, and
Speaker 1: then they set up this the system. Not only are
Speaker 1: people getting acclimated to it, you know, that's a big
Speaker 1: part of thinking of a lockdown, getting people acclimated to
Speaker 1: universal basic income, but you know, moving this overton window
Speaker 1: is a very important thing for them. And so if
Speaker 1: they open everything up and let everybody play with crypto,
Speaker 1: and now everybody is really excited because all the walls
Speaker 1: are coming down and it's going to be you know,
Speaker 1: some freedom for a while, kind of like what they
Speaker 1: did with the Internet. Then they'll drop the hammer at
Speaker 1: some point in the future. May be a false flag
Speaker 1: like you said, yep, yeah.
Speaker 13: And again it's going to happen. It's only going to
Speaker 13: be a matter of when. Look what's going on in China.
Speaker 13: Nobody uses cash anymore. Put your palm out and pay
Speaker 13: your thing, Yeah, you know nobody. So it's not cash
Speaker 13: is going to go away and everything becomes digitized. And
Speaker 13: once it becomes more and more digitized, then they don't care.
Speaker 13: They don't care what's backing it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if any first, yeah, Oh.
Speaker 13: By the way, how come we're not allowed to go
Speaker 13: into Fort Knox to see where the gold is.
Speaker 1: It's virtual gold now. It's like the paper gold and
Speaker 1: the Shanghai Gold exchange, right, is it really there? It
Speaker 1: doesn't crack spot price of gold. It's doing its own thing.
Speaker 1: I think they're using that to manipulate the price of gold.
Speaker 13: Gold prices again, when Trump came in, that changed the
Speaker 13: gold rally. I mean gold, you know, it's the least
Speaker 13: two days, it's down almost like one hundred bucks, you know,
Speaker 13: last three days. But our top trend for twenty twenty
Speaker 13: four was a golden year for gold. Well Gold's now
Speaker 13: about two thousand, six hundred and seventy dollars an ounce.
Speaker 13: You know, it was up to it was two thousand
Speaker 13: and eight h but it's still up from when we
Speaker 13: made that forecast. That's right about six hundred and forty
Speaker 13: dollars an ounce.
Speaker 1: Hey, you know is it? There's all this expectation again
Speaker 1: in this honeymoon period. But the fundamentals are still there.
Speaker 1: I mean, we still have everybody we're running away from
Speaker 1: the dollar. We still have inflation, we still have the
Speaker 1: deficit and debt, and they's still the privacy issue as well.
Speaker 1: But is there that I think gold to me wins on.
Speaker 1: But you know it is a lot of these fundamentals
Speaker 1: are still there, and you've got a lot of analysts
Speaker 1: are still saying that they think that next year is
Speaker 1: going to go up close to three thousand dollars. I mean,
Speaker 1: what do you think about gold?
Speaker 13: And it's again it's you got to see what Trump
Speaker 13: is going to If he low is interest rates, gold
Speaker 13: prices are going to go up because the dollar is
Speaker 13: going to go down. But right now the dollar is
Speaker 13: very strong, and you just saw the ECB lowed interest
Speaker 13: rates yesterday twenty five basis points, but they're still high
Speaker 13: compared to where they were negative territory back in the
Speaker 13: twenty twenties two. And then you have Canada just lower
Speaker 13: their interest rates fifty basis points and look at the looney,
Speaker 13: look at the Euro. They're going down, and so it
Speaker 13: costs more because gold is dollar based for other countries
Speaker 13: to buy it when the dollar is so strong. But
Speaker 13: that's what gets what keeps the prices down. And with
Speaker 13: the fear of inflation at this point is negative for
Speaker 13: gold because they fear that if inflation has gone up
Speaker 13: like there's last numbers to produce a price index was
Speaker 13: higher than anticipated. That brought gold prices down because they
Speaker 13: feel the FAD won't lower interest rates because inflation's going up.
Speaker 1: But again, you think he's going to get from Powell.
Speaker 1: Is Powell going to fight him? You know, Pal's and
Speaker 1: I'm not leaving and he can't fire me. That type
Speaker 1: of thing. You think he's going to get what he
Speaker 1: wants out of Powell.
Speaker 13: Take a look at Powell. Take a look at this guy.
Speaker 13: See a fighter. You see a fighter. It doesn't look
Speaker 13: like it doesn't look like you don't get those jobs
Speaker 13: by being a fighter. Yeah, you get it those jobs
Speaker 13: by being a member of the club. Yeah, you're in
Speaker 13: the fraternity.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's all it is.
Speaker 13: There's one big club, and you ain't in it. As
Speaker 13: George Carlins said, that's right. No, no, Trump again. Trump
Speaker 13: pushed Powell to lower interest rates in December of twenty
Speaker 13: eighteen when the markets are crashing, and Powell lowered them
Speaker 13: in January, and that created a false boom again in
Speaker 13: the economy, and they had their repo crisis. You look
Speaker 13: at the data going back to twenty nineteen, this country
Speaker 13: was going down economically, and then the COVID War breaks
Speaker 13: out on January twenty twenty on Chinese Lunar New Year,
Speaker 13: the Year the rat and everybody forgot about that Germany
Speaker 13: was going into a recession in twenty nineteen. Yeah, you
Speaker 13: right now you're at you're looking at the top ten
Speaker 13: countries in the world that are on their economies are
Speaker 13: going down, other than the United States, we have the
Speaker 13: strongest economy. Again, it was artificially propped up. Keeps being
Speaker 13: artificially propped up, just like the equity markets who artificially
Speaker 13: propped up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I agree. Well, it's going to be interesting
Speaker 1: to see what happens, and we're going to see a
Speaker 1: lot of things changing very quickly when you look at
Speaker 1: the people that Trump's got in there. Pretty much. You know,
Speaker 1: if RFK Junior doesn't do any of this stuff, at
Speaker 1: least the things that he has said have moved the
Speaker 1: public expectation in a positive way. I think, you know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of things that I'd like to say
Speaker 1: see him do that he hasn't done, and he can
Speaker 1: be a bit of a limited hangout and a lot
Speaker 1: of this stuff, but still there's a lot of positive
Speaker 1: that could come out of that, So we'll just hope
Speaker 1: that that's going to be the case. And again, what
Speaker 1: else is on your on your radar there? And again
Speaker 1: what do you think of this guy bestent? This sorrows guy?
Speaker 1: I mean he was he was there with sorrows when
Speaker 1: they broke the Bank of England? Is he gonna is
Speaker 1: he going to break the bank here?
Speaker 8: Uh?
Speaker 13: They want you know the positive Another positive thing is
Speaker 13: you know, yeah, I really believe in bringing down the
Speaker 13: government to get rid of all these stupid jobs. Here.
Speaker 13: Look at the numbers of jobs that we're creating. How
Speaker 13: what look at the number of government jobs that were
Speaker 13: created in the last round.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, that's basically all of the jobs created
Speaker 1: were government jobs.
Speaker 13: Yeah, you know, no government jobs. Social service job would
Speaker 13: pay nothing, healthcare that social service ends, and and uh,
Speaker 13: restaurants and service industries that pay nothing. But we don't
Speaker 13: need these government jobs. I am in total in favor
Speaker 13: bringing down all of these stupid government jobs. Now I
Speaker 13: was the assistant of the secretary of the New York
Speaker 13: State Senators. You know, the people of the bureaucrats are
Speaker 13: the lowest life pieces of some company could find out there.
Speaker 13: They can't get a job in the real world. They
Speaker 13: suck into the political system and they become the most arrogant.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah. I mean just look at what
Speaker 1: we were talking about earlier, that go in and knock
Speaker 1: the houses down, that the Amish bill for these people,
Speaker 1: and what kind of a person does.
Speaker 13: That, Yeah, the most arrogant. So I'm in total favor
Speaker 13: of them bringing down cutting out these government jobs and
Speaker 13: Department of Education. What education, it's a government school system.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, the thing is, though, I don't think that,
Speaker 1: you know, when you look at it, they're talking about
Speaker 1: two trillion. I don't see true trillion that's there unless
Speaker 1: you do structural changes of the entitlement programs is just
Speaker 1: not there. And then whatever Ramaswami and Musk and their
Speaker 1: people talk about, it's going to be chump change if
Speaker 1: they don't do some major structural change. I mean, you've
Speaker 1: got to get rid of some major bureaucracies, as we're
Speaker 1: talking about earlier, the different things like the EPA or
Speaker 1: you know, the Department of Energy, all these things that
Speaker 1: came about, you know, only about thirty forty fifty years ago,
Speaker 1: and they have been a thorn in everybody's side all
Speaker 1: of this time. Those entire agencies need to go. But
Speaker 1: all that has to come from the from Congress, and
Speaker 1: you've got Mike Johnson who wants to operate like Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi to him omnibus bills and just running everything through.
Speaker 1: I'm very pessimistic about a.
Speaker 13: Will, but David, we all do. Mike Johnson will fold
Speaker 13: like that. He's not he's not his own man.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, but he doesn't. He doesn't do anything
Speaker 1: unless they stop of the omnibus bill stuff. They're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to cut expenses anywhere they can
Speaker 1: make their recommendations. But if these guys do nothing, you know.
Speaker 13: I think Trump's going to have the power of Congress.
Speaker 13: And a guy like Mike Johnson, he's a nobody. He'll
Speaker 13: just do what he's told.
Speaker 1: And again, how I see I'm photo bombing all the
Speaker 1: pictures of Trump and Elon Musk, you know, on the
Speaker 1: plane and everything else. Mike Johnson, how about.
Speaker 13: How about getting rid of homeland security? Is something they
Speaker 13: invented after nine to eleven?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, what what is?
Speaker 13: What the hell is homeland security done for us?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 13: Get rid of the FBI and the CIA. How about
Speaker 13: getting rid of those?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Oh no, cash hotel is going to make it work good.
Speaker 1: He's going to keep it around. He's going to fix it.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like the meme going around is like
Speaker 1: born Marror. He's going to get the Ring of Power,
Speaker 1: and I know I can use this for good. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's the problem with all this stuff. They don't want
Speaker 1: to really cut the size of government. Uh, they don't
Speaker 1: want to really restore the rule of law. They just
Speaker 1: want to make sure they use these things for their
Speaker 1: own purposes. That's really what I think we're going to
Speaker 1: see with it. Well, we'll see what happens. And it's
Speaker 1: always great talking to you, Cheryl. Think you so much. Folks,
Speaker 1: go to Trendsjournal dot com, as Gerald said, half the
Speaker 1: price a one week a subscription of that is half
Speaker 1: the price of one day of the Wall Street Journal,
Speaker 1: and you get real news, you get real trends, and
Speaker 1: you can use a code night to make that happen.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Gerald for coming on. Appreciate it.
Speaker 13: Oh, thank you, thank you for all that you do.
Speaker 13: I really appreciate being on with you.
Speaker 1: Thank you. And I don't know we're going to see
Speaker 1: you before Christmas. If not, I have a merry Christmas.
Speaker 1: I don't know where our schedule is that we have
Speaker 1: you every a couple of weeks. I don't know if
Speaker 1: we've got two weeks before that or not. But have
Speaker 1: a merry Christmas. If we don't see you, then thank
Speaker 1: you so much. All right, folks, and let me say
Speaker 1: thanks to Brian for the tip and to Sandy Hayes,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. And we also know the drums
Speaker 1: in New Jersey elsewhere aren't aliens.
Speaker 13: Yeah, and.
Speaker 1: The government is lying to us up one side and
Speaker 1: down the other light they do everything. Mark Bender, thank
Speaker 1: you very much. Joining Late Today loves the album, says
Speaker 1: you're my go to guy for information. It's clear your
Speaker 1: passion as music. Well, thank you very much. Karen, play
Speaker 1: the Jimmy Stewart so as would go out here if
Speaker 1: you can. All right, I'll do that and we'll play
Speaker 1: that on the way out.
Speaker 4: I wish right a Christmas Night album.
Speaker 5: You can get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow
Speaker 5: dot com for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 3: There's right in the second flour O there say what'd
Speaker 3: you wish, George, Well, not just one wish, a whole
Speaker 3: hat flow.
Speaker 5: First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot Com and purchase
Speaker 5: the Christmas Night Album. Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas
Speaker 5: classics like are you gonna throw it up?
Speaker 7: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty good.
Speaker 9: Hello girls, can't you come out to me?
Speaker 10: Can't you come old?
Speaker 5: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 5: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
Speaker 5: all new.
Speaker 4: I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 3: What do you want you at the moon?
Speaker 6: Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
Speaker 6: pull it down.
Speaker 11: I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
Speaker 11: your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album