WEBVTT

1
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:08.679
<v Speaker 1>This week's episode of the Tribecast is brought to you

2
00:00:08.759 --> 00:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Texas Tribune Membership program. Hello and welcome to

3
00:00:20.879 --> 00:00:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the Tribecast for Tuesday, July twenty ninth. I'm Eleanor Klebanoff,

4
00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>law and politics reporter here at the Tribune, joined this

5
00:00:28.760 --> 00:00:33.359
<v Speaker 1>week by A. Matthew Watkins stand in politics editor, Jasper Sharer.

6
00:00:33.600 --> 00:00:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Jasper, thanks for being here, of course, thanks for having me.

7
00:00:36.119 --> 00:00:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Matthew is in luxurious, beautiful Porto ransis the place to

8
00:00:42.759 --> 00:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>be in the summer, and I would make fun of it.

9
00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>But we are in the Texas capital, so not much better.

10
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I am curious, Jasper, before we jump in. This is

11
00:00:53.679 --> 00:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your We're in the special session. You're now an editor.

12
00:00:56.600 --> 00:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's your first session in how many years that you're not? Sorry,

13
00:01:00.960 --> 00:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I should tee that up, first session? How many years

14
00:01:02.679 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are not on the floor of the capitol.

15
00:01:04.599 --> 00:01:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh man, Well, I started covering state politics as a

16
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>reporter right around when the Dems broke quorum. I guess

17
00:01:13.239 --> 00:01:15.519
<v Speaker 4>you know, I might have specified broke korum the first

18
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:18.319
<v Speaker 4>time if we get a second one momentarily here. But

19
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:22.040
<v Speaker 4>so twenty twenty one, the first special session there was

20
00:01:22.040 --> 00:01:22.840
<v Speaker 4>my first.

21
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not the first time two thousand and three, but

22
00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the right right first time.

23
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Also probably wasn't the first.

24
00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>The first tis time history.

25
00:01:30.760 --> 00:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>John Morritz would say, you know right, this was the

26
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>second time.

27
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>It is a longer memory than me. Yes.

28
00:01:35.560 --> 00:01:37.319
<v Speaker 3>So are you missing being on the floor.

29
00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I think so.

30
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's been sort of slow so far, so

31
00:01:40.879 --> 00:01:44.000
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, I miss kind of the idea of

32
00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:46.879
<v Speaker 4>being around the hustle and bustle. But I still feel

33
00:01:47.239 --> 00:01:50.079
<v Speaker 4>I can live vicariously through through you guys being there.

34
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:53.079
<v Speaker 4>So do you want to trade Maybe I'll maybe I'll

35
00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:55.000
<v Speaker 4>make my way down there, just to relive the glory

36
00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>days a little bit.

37
00:01:56.000 --> 00:01:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we love that. Well, we're going to jump right in.

38
00:01:59.799 --> 00:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. Last week we had an episode with the

39
00:02:02.719 --> 00:02:05.159
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Texas Democratic Party, Kendall Scudder, sort of

40
00:02:05.159 --> 00:02:08.479
<v Speaker 1>looking at the dems prospects for the twenty twenty six midterms.

41
00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:10.439
<v Speaker 3>This week we are going.

42
00:02:10.280 --> 00:02:12.879
<v Speaker 1>To look at the other side of the aisle, the

43
00:02:12.879 --> 00:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican's prospects. I will say we did extend an invitation

44
00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to GOP chair Abraham George, who it wasn't the right

45
00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>time for him to join us, but he said he

46
00:02:23.719 --> 00:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>plans to join in the future. So we will extend

47
00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that invitation and open invitation to Chairman George Yes anytime.

48
00:02:30.520 --> 00:02:33.919
<v Speaker 3>So in his stead we have the Dean of.

49
00:02:33.879 --> 00:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Texas Talk Radio, Mark Davis, on the air for more

50
00:02:38.159 --> 00:02:42.199
<v Speaker 1>than forty years in the Dallas Fort Worth area. His

51
00:02:42.639 --> 00:02:44.759
<v Speaker 1>bio and I think we would agree with this, says

52
00:02:45.159 --> 00:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the foremost conservative voice locally and nationally, a morning fixture

53
00:02:49.599 --> 00:02:52.759
<v Speaker 1>on six sixty Am The Answer. He is also a

54
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>columnist for the Fort Worth Start Telegram, McClatchy Newspapers, Newsweek,

55
00:02:57.039 --> 00:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and town Hall.

56
00:02:58.000 --> 00:02:59.199
<v Speaker 3>Mark, thanks for joining.

57
00:02:58.960 --> 00:03:02.280
<v Speaker 5>Us, great pleasure. Thank you guys, appreciate being here.

58
00:03:02.439 --> 00:03:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, you know, I want to sort of start

59
00:03:04.479 --> 00:03:07.199
<v Speaker 1>before we jump into twenty twenty six and talk about

60
00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, look back in time a little bit and

61
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:12.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about twenty twenty four, you know, just a gangbusters

62
00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>election for Republicans in Texas nationally. I'm curious, Mark, were

63
00:03:18.120 --> 00:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you anticipating such a good year for Republicans nationally, you know,

64
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>with Trump at the top of the ticket. How to

65
00:03:24.719 --> 00:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of line up with your expectations.

66
00:03:27.680 --> 00:03:31.159
<v Speaker 5>It's everything is relative. And as I'm sitting here doing

67
00:03:31.159 --> 00:03:34.000
<v Speaker 5>shows in this room, talking about the presidential race, talking

68
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>about national issues. Talking about Texas issues, the Texas landscape

69
00:03:40.360 --> 00:03:44.000
<v Speaker 5>seemed pretty baked in. Democrats have had a long and

70
00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:46.719
<v Speaker 5>tortured experience ever since I've been back in my native

71
00:03:46.719 --> 00:03:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Texas nineteen ninety four. Oh, we're going to turn it purple.

72
00:03:50.120 --> 00:03:52.919
<v Speaker 5>We're going to turn it blue. Guys, how's that working out?

73
00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:55.360
<v Speaker 5>And I don't know, never say never, but that's not

74
00:03:55.439 --> 00:03:56.680
<v Speaker 5>happening even in the near term.

75
00:03:56.719 --> 00:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

76
00:03:56.919 --> 00:04:00.439
<v Speaker 5>Nationally it was not as cut and dry because Trump

77
00:04:00.520 --> 00:04:03.039
<v Speaker 5>is always the X factory. There's going to be hot

78
00:04:03.080 --> 00:04:07.919
<v Speaker 5>passions obviously for him. That is going to spark hot

79
00:04:07.960 --> 00:04:13.800
<v Speaker 5>passions against him. So I think what solidified my confidence?

80
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:19.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean Trump, He's a known entity, He's Trump. I think,

81
00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:23.519
<v Speaker 5>you know the level of positivity he's going to attract,

82
00:04:23.920 --> 00:04:26.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, the high level of negativity that's going to

83
00:04:26.519 --> 00:04:29.319
<v Speaker 5>be there to meet those positive folks, those supporters on

84
00:04:29.399 --> 00:04:32.800
<v Speaker 5>the battlefield. So the real difference was what were the

85
00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:36.199
<v Speaker 5>Democrats going to do? And as things just got progressively

86
00:04:36.360 --> 00:04:42.040
<v Speaker 5>worse for the Democrats presidentially from the obvious even my

87
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:45.199
<v Speaker 5>dog knew it, cognitive decline of Joe Biden, and then

88
00:04:45.240 --> 00:04:49.480
<v Speaker 5>they give him the hook and then forward the Kamala

89
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Harris candidacy, without a single vote being cast for her,

90
00:04:53.600 --> 00:04:55.160
<v Speaker 5>without a saying I mean here, I am doing a

91
00:04:55.160 --> 00:04:59.279
<v Speaker 5>conservative talk to saying Democrats, I feel for you. I'm

92
00:04:59.319 --> 00:05:03.160
<v Speaker 5>taking calls from Democrats saying could we please have a primary?

93
00:05:03.319 --> 00:05:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Could we please have four or five people? And maybe

94
00:05:06.079 --> 00:05:10.279
<v Speaker 5>Kamala would prevail in that scrum or maybe not, but

95
00:05:10.360 --> 00:05:13.519
<v Speaker 5>at least something that resembles fair competition. That did not

96
00:05:13.639 --> 00:05:16.720
<v Speaker 5>serve her well. Kamala was also not served well by

97
00:05:16.759 --> 00:05:20.800
<v Speaker 5>her complete, near complete lack of campaign skill set. It

98
00:05:20.839 --> 00:05:24.680
<v Speaker 5>was one of the truly worst campaigns ever run by anyone,

99
00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:28.279
<v Speaker 5>and as that began to take shape, the Trump victory

100
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:31.480
<v Speaker 5>became a lot easier to envision because while there were

101
00:05:31.519 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 5>a lot of things that were unknown, a lot of

102
00:05:34.639 --> 00:05:37.279
<v Speaker 5>things that were hidden factories yet to be played out,

103
00:05:37.600 --> 00:05:39.839
<v Speaker 5>one thing that was clear, and that was the Democrats

104
00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:43.160
<v Speaker 5>and dug themselves an enormous hole, which is part of

105
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:43.839
<v Speaker 5>why Trump won.

106
00:05:44.959 --> 00:05:48.639
<v Speaker 1>It's such a like how quickly things evolve in politics

107
00:05:48.639 --> 00:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that Trump was the known quantity in that election, Like

108
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:53.519
<v Speaker 1>when you think about twenty sixteen or everyone was like,

109
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is happening with this guy?

110
00:05:56.079 --> 00:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>And now it's like the safe choice, the more predictable choice, the.

111
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Familiar, the familiarity, and even it even gets weirder that

112
00:06:06.000 --> 00:06:09.040
<v Speaker 5>with all of his personal paccadillos, with all of his

113
00:06:09.319 --> 00:06:11.879
<v Speaker 5>you know, wheels off behavioral things, one of the reasons

114
00:06:11.879 --> 00:06:15.639
<v Speaker 5>he won is that he was the normalcy candidate that

115
00:06:16.879 --> 00:06:19.079
<v Speaker 5>I know. That's the kind of thing that I mean

116
00:06:19.279 --> 00:06:22.399
<v Speaker 5>what but by that I mean not by being a

117
00:06:22.439 --> 00:06:26.040
<v Speaker 5>conventional candidate in his own way, but through things, you know,

118
00:06:26.079 --> 00:06:29.319
<v Speaker 5>I feel, pardon me, things like border normalcy, which means

119
00:06:29.399 --> 00:06:32.680
<v Speaker 5>having one gender, normalcy, which means knowing how many there are,

120
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:38.399
<v Speaker 5>a certain trade normalcy, which involves bringing the playing field

121
00:06:39.000 --> 00:06:42.000
<v Speaker 5>into a better level place. So even in the way

122
00:06:42.040 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 5>that Nixon, who is not real popular one in nineteen

123
00:06:45.399 --> 00:06:47.879
<v Speaker 5>sixty eight and seventy two, by being kind of a

124
00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:50.800
<v Speaker 5>normalcy candidate, even though he might not have been that popular,

125
00:06:51.160 --> 00:06:53.160
<v Speaker 5>a lot of voters said, well, I can think what

126
00:06:53.279 --> 00:06:55.959
<v Speaker 5>I think about him, but it seems like either he's

127
00:06:56.040 --> 00:06:58.560
<v Speaker 5>less crazy or the other people are too crazy. And

128
00:06:58.600 --> 00:07:01.040
<v Speaker 5>that too was part of the twenty twenty four when.

129
00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's an interesting comparison to that, to that Nixon

130
00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:11.079
<v Speaker 1>election and just sort of you know people, you know,

131
00:07:11.120 --> 00:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>without condemning any of our elected officials sort of the

132
00:07:13.439 --> 00:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>devil you know, versus the.

133
00:07:14.959 --> 00:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Devil you don't.

134
00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:17.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would say it was pretty striking to see

135
00:07:18.480 --> 00:07:21.839
<v Speaker 4>a fourteen point win in Texas. I mean I didn't

136
00:07:21.879 --> 00:07:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think any of the polling, you know. If anything,

137
00:07:27.040 --> 00:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I think the one of the takeaways was just, you know,

138
00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:34.319
<v Speaker 4>we can only rely on polling in Texas so much

139
00:07:34.399 --> 00:07:37.160
<v Speaker 4>coming out of some of these recent cycles that you know,

140
00:07:37.279 --> 00:07:39.639
<v Speaker 4>not universally across the board. I think there were some

141
00:07:40.279 --> 00:07:43.120
<v Speaker 4>posters who got pretty close, but I don't think anyone

142
00:07:43.279 --> 00:07:46.920
<v Speaker 4>was fully predicting fourteen points for Trump. I think it

143
00:07:46.959 --> 00:07:48.720
<v Speaker 4>was eight and a half for Cruise at the end

144
00:07:48.759 --> 00:07:52.399
<v Speaker 4>of the day. So and that really sets the tone

145
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:56.399
<v Speaker 4>in kind of a problematic way for Democrats heading into

146
00:07:56.439 --> 00:07:59.399
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty six, even though folks are talking about them,

147
00:07:59.759 --> 00:08:02.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, having just sort of the national wind at

148
00:08:02.439 --> 00:08:05.319
<v Speaker 4>their back just by virtue of it being a Republican

149
00:08:05.319 --> 00:08:08.759
<v Speaker 4>in the White House midterm cycle. But on the other hand,

150
00:08:08.759 --> 00:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>we're coming off really a landslide blowout two years ago.

151
00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, I Mean, conventional wisdom would say twenty twenty six

152
00:08:17.399 --> 00:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a midterm year. The president is you know, dealing with

153
00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:24.959
<v Speaker 1>some unpopularity issues passing, you know, some policies that we

154
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:27.079
<v Speaker 1>will probably you know, by twenty twenty six be seeing

155
00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the impact of in one direction or another, you know,

156
00:08:31.040 --> 00:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>putting aside the ongoing redistricting fight that could change things

157
00:08:34.480 --> 00:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on the congressional front. Mark what is sort of your

158
00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball telling you at this point for you know,

159
00:08:40.399 --> 00:08:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the lay of the land coming into twenty twenty six.

160
00:08:42.440 --> 00:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>For Republicans, let's talk about the sort of a midterm

161
00:08:46.679 --> 00:08:49.840
<v Speaker 5>map that you referred to the way it usually goes

162
00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:54.960
<v Speaker 5>for Republican and Democrat presidents alike, is that when when

163
00:08:55.000 --> 00:08:57.360
<v Speaker 5>you win the White House, the first midterm is the

164
00:08:57.399 --> 00:09:00.399
<v Speaker 5>pendulum swinging back the other way. And the other thing

165
00:09:00.399 --> 00:09:03.879
<v Speaker 5>that usually happens in a president's second term. Ask Bush,

166
00:09:04.120 --> 00:09:09.559
<v Speaker 5>ask Reagan. Everybody starts to get tired of you. It's

167
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:12.279
<v Speaker 5>like a coach, you lose the locker room. But here's

168
00:09:12.320 --> 00:09:19.279
<v Speaker 5>the thing, and history may record that Trump losing, I know,

169
00:09:19.559 --> 00:09:23.480
<v Speaker 5>did he the Trump not regating the White House, not

170
00:09:23.639 --> 00:09:26.919
<v Speaker 5>reoccupying the White House in twenty twenty might have been

171
00:09:26.919 --> 00:09:30.720
<v Speaker 5>the absolute best thing to happen to him, because this

172
00:09:30.799 --> 00:09:33.039
<v Speaker 5>Trump two point, Oh imagine if he had won it

173
00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:35.240
<v Speaker 5>had been, first of all, you'd be gone by now

174
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:37.519
<v Speaker 5>who knows what we'd have. And I take calls every

175
00:09:37.559 --> 00:09:40.480
<v Speaker 5>day from people who say God's timing, Mark God's timing.

176
00:09:40.519 --> 00:09:44.399
<v Speaker 5>I'll leave that to individuals to discern. But there's no

177
00:09:44.440 --> 00:09:46.240
<v Speaker 5>doubt that he was able to hit the ground running

178
00:09:46.279 --> 00:09:50.200
<v Speaker 5>like a freshly inaugurated first termer. And talk I mean

179
00:09:50.360 --> 00:09:53.039
<v Speaker 5>energy with a capital E, rather than the kind of

180
00:09:53.120 --> 00:09:57.039
<v Speaker 5>fatigue that can kick in at Bush's second term, Reagan's

181
00:09:57.039 --> 00:09:59.840
<v Speaker 5>second term, Obama's second term. There's something about that th

182
00:10:00.039 --> 00:10:03.919
<v Speaker 5>if sixth, seventh, eighth year of being president where everything

183
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:07.639
<v Speaker 5>just starts to become a slog. Trump has been spared

184
00:10:07.919 --> 00:10:10.240
<v Speaker 5>all of that, coming back for a two point zero that,

185
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:14.840
<v Speaker 5>like the Grover Cleveland metoreum, is non consecutive, and it

186
00:10:15.080 --> 00:10:17.000
<v Speaker 5>means that it's a it's a kind of a fresh

187
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:20.799
<v Speaker 5>start that the usual conventional second drug president does not Yet.

188
00:10:20.840 --> 00:10:23.639
<v Speaker 5>So here's how this goes to the midterm. The fatigue

189
00:10:23.639 --> 00:10:25.960
<v Speaker 5>factor might not be so large, and Trump may be

190
00:10:26.919 --> 00:10:29.039
<v Speaker 5>I mean, listen, these first six months have been exhausting.

191
00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:31.519
<v Speaker 5>I mean for critics and fans alike, just keeping track.

192
00:10:31.759 --> 00:10:33.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, the usual saying is, you know, are you.

193
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:35.639
<v Speaker 5>Are you tired of the winning yet? You know, and

194
00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:38.000
<v Speaker 5>it hasn't all been winning, and some of it's been difficult,

195
00:10:38.000 --> 00:10:40.440
<v Speaker 5>and there are critics to be found around every corner.

196
00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:45.159
<v Speaker 5>But it may be that that pure results and a

197
00:10:45.279 --> 00:10:49.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of an eye opening change in the kind of

198
00:10:49.440 --> 00:10:53.240
<v Speaker 5>voters that Trump is attracting, poaching away some of the

199
00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:57.840
<v Speaker 5>working class, poaching away. Listen, that implies poaching, implies theft,

200
00:10:57.879 --> 00:11:01.440
<v Speaker 5>like you're not entitled. Increasing numbers young voters, increasing numbers

201
00:11:01.440 --> 00:11:04.720
<v Speaker 5>of minority voters. If this continues, you can't help but

202
00:11:04.759 --> 00:11:07.639
<v Speaker 5>feel pretty good about Republicans and the midterms. But then

203
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:09.639
<v Speaker 5>the lesson of all life kicks in, and that is,

204
00:11:09.679 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Speaker 5>don't ever get comfortable. Also, the midterms are forever. Primaries

205
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:16.840
<v Speaker 5>in Texas in March November of next year is like

206
00:11:16.879 --> 00:11:21.039
<v Speaker 5>on Carl Sagan's cosmic calendar. It's it's the deep deep distance.

207
00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:23.360
<v Speaker 5>So the only thing is certain in life has change.

208
00:11:23.559 --> 00:11:26.360
<v Speaker 5>Pendulums can swing in a variety of ways. But you

209
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:28.200
<v Speaker 5>have to say, if the elections were held right now,

210
00:11:28.200 --> 00:11:30.799
<v Speaker 5>they'd go pretty well for Republicans. But they're not held

211
00:11:30.879 --> 00:11:31.240
<v Speaker 5>right now.

212
00:11:32.159 --> 00:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Right and if you think about everything that's happened in

213
00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the last six months, you know, and then how long

214
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we have until the midterms. It's like that could go dependulent,

215
00:11:40.519 --> 00:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>could swing back and forth, and just how quickly think

216
00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump moves, you know, through everything. It could really go

217
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of directions between now and then.

218
00:11:48.399 --> 00:11:51.039
<v Speaker 4>Right yeah, I mean you think back to that crazy

219
00:11:51.039 --> 00:11:53.320
<v Speaker 4>period in July a year ago where you get an

220
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:56.879
<v Speaker 4>assassination attempt to change in who the you know, presumed

221
00:11:56.960 --> 00:11:58.679
<v Speaker 4>Democratic nominee is going to be at the top of

222
00:11:58.679 --> 00:12:01.919
<v Speaker 4>the ticket, like you know, let alone a year and

223
00:12:01.960 --> 00:12:02.240
<v Speaker 4>a half.

224
00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>These things can change, you know, on a on a dime.

225
00:12:04.799 --> 00:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think you know, there's also the conversation about

226
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:12.600
<v Speaker 4>who ends up being the nominee for for Republicans, I guess,

227
00:12:12.759 --> 00:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, the various nominees, not just for the US

228
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Senate race that everyone's talking about these days. But you know,

229
00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:22.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that could you know, that's another thing that

230
00:12:22.360 --> 00:12:24.320
<v Speaker 4>has to play out before we have any sense of

231
00:12:25.120 --> 00:12:27.039
<v Speaker 4>what November a year and a half from now, will

232
00:12:27.039 --> 00:12:27.399
<v Speaker 4>look like.

233
00:12:27.879 --> 00:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Right right.

234
00:12:28.960 --> 00:12:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I will share a fun fact, which is that you

235
00:12:30.799 --> 00:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Grover Cleveland, the only other non consecutive president I

236
00:12:35.279 --> 00:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you might know this. My cat is named after Grover Cleveland.

237
00:12:38.360 --> 00:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>And God knows that.

238
00:12:39.159 --> 00:12:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

239
00:12:39.519 --> 00:12:40.720
<v Speaker 3>And I actually adopted him.

240
00:12:40.759 --> 00:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The reason he's named after a president at all is

241
00:12:42.639 --> 00:12:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that I adopted him on the eve of the twenty

242
00:12:44.759 --> 00:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sixteen election. I was living in rural Pennsylvania, was covering

243
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the election quite a great I was out at Trump

244
00:12:50.759 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>rallies all the time. I was out in Scranton with

245
00:12:53.200 --> 00:12:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Hillary and out with you know, Trump. And and I

246
00:12:57.000 --> 00:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>adopted him, you know, maybe like right around Halloween, so

247
00:13:00.120 --> 00:13:02.879
<v Speaker 1>right before and then I thought I'd name him the

248
00:13:02.919 --> 00:13:06.799
<v Speaker 1>second most catlike name of a president, just Grover, the

249
00:13:06.799 --> 00:13:07.639
<v Speaker 1>first being.

250
00:13:09.039 --> 00:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Millard Garfield.

251
00:13:14.360 --> 00:13:16.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna I'm gonna go Millard Millard.

252
00:13:19.679 --> 00:13:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I approve that is good.

253
00:13:21.080 --> 00:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And now it's funny because we I did not realize

254
00:13:23.480 --> 00:13:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that that was the election, you know, of course, you

255
00:13:26.080 --> 00:13:27.759
<v Speaker 1>know where at that time, I didn't know who would win.

256
00:13:27.799 --> 00:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>But I also didn't know.

257
00:13:28.519 --> 00:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>That he would go on to be the next very prescient,

258
00:13:32.120 --> 00:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>non consecutive president. What did you say, God's timing there, you.

259
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Go, It works in a number of ways.

260
00:13:37.519 --> 00:13:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, detail real quick.

261
00:13:40.360 --> 00:13:42.000
<v Speaker 5>On the notion of things that could change. Because you're

262
00:13:42.000 --> 00:13:45.279
<v Speaker 5>sitting there, we all agree it is July about to

263
00:13:45.279 --> 00:13:48.799
<v Speaker 5>the August the primaries are still a good way down

264
00:13:48.799 --> 00:13:51.080
<v Speaker 5>the road in November, seems to be on the district rise.

265
00:13:51.559 --> 00:13:54.240
<v Speaker 5>But if you are a Democrat and you're and your thinking,

266
00:13:54.480 --> 00:13:56.799
<v Speaker 5>and pardon the way this sounds, you're looking for something

267
00:13:56.840 --> 00:13:59.879
<v Speaker 5>to go wrong, as a Republicans do. When Democrats something

268
00:14:00.120 --> 00:14:02.600
<v Speaker 5>wrong that we could weaponize, that we could take advantage

269
00:14:02.600 --> 00:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>of that we can turn to our advantage. Look at

270
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:07.919
<v Speaker 5>what they would be there really would be either the economy,

271
00:14:08.039 --> 00:14:12.639
<v Speaker 5>the border, the world and the world go crazy. I mean,

272
00:14:12.679 --> 00:14:16.600
<v Speaker 5>if we get a Russia Ukraine East deal, if we

273
00:14:16.679 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 5>get some end to Israel and Ammas where they can

274
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:22.879
<v Speaker 5>actually be defeated, we can have actual peace in the

275
00:14:22.879 --> 00:14:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Middle East. On the economy, inflation seems pretty under control

276
00:14:26.919 --> 00:14:29.279
<v Speaker 5>right now. The tariffs that everybody thought we'd be, you know,

277
00:14:29.279 --> 00:14:31.360
<v Speaker 5>in our front yard eating our neighbor's liver because the

278
00:14:31.399 --> 00:14:33.360
<v Speaker 5>terriffs were going to destroy us and send us into

279
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:37.440
<v Speaker 5>fourteen recessions and sixteen depressions, it simply has not happened.

280
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:42.960
<v Speaker 5>The things that in the border seems silly me secure,

281
00:14:43.720 --> 00:14:47.320
<v Speaker 5>that's what's the thing that's going to go wrong. What

282
00:14:47.559 --> 00:14:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I guess, the economy always can, the world always can.

283
00:14:52.399 --> 00:14:56.039
<v Speaker 5>But boy, It's one wonders where the bottom drops at

284
00:14:56.240 --> 00:14:58.799
<v Speaker 5>what we would need to have happen that would suddenly

285
00:14:58.840 --> 00:15:03.639
<v Speaker 5>be such a chink in Trump's armor, such an enormous

286
00:15:03.639 --> 00:15:06.200
<v Speaker 5>hole for him to dig out of. Again, anything's possible,

287
00:15:06.240 --> 00:15:08.480
<v Speaker 5>But that's part of my confidence is high because the

288
00:15:08.480 --> 00:15:11.000
<v Speaker 5>things he actually ran on are things that actually for

289
00:15:11.080 --> 00:15:13.320
<v Speaker 5>the moment, seem to be working well.

290
00:15:13.360 --> 00:15:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And I think, and we'll talk about this with some

291
00:15:14.840 --> 00:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas candidates as well, like they're certainly in Texas a

292
00:15:18.240 --> 00:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of like it would have to be significantly wrong,

293
00:15:22.679 --> 00:15:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, even tech for Texas Republicans particularly to turn

294
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on President Trump. But you know, there are certain candidates

295
00:15:29.879 --> 00:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in Texas who sometime seem a little impervious and to

296
00:15:32.399 --> 00:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>your question, know what could go wrong? What could go

297
00:15:34.720 --> 00:15:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so wrong that it would change the political calculus or

298
00:15:38.320 --> 00:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>the common wisdom. Let's take a quick break for a

299
00:15:41.559 --> 00:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sponsor message, and then we'll get into some of.

300
00:15:43.320 --> 00:15:45.159
<v Speaker 3>These Texas specific races.

301
00:15:46.240 --> 00:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is supported by members of the Texas Tribune.

302
00:15:50.559 --> 00:15:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Texas needs trusted journalism. Help sustain fact based reporting with

303
00:15:54.759 --> 00:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>your donation. Become a member of the Texas Tribune today

304
00:15:58.200 --> 00:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at Texastribune dot org. Slash donate Texas Tribune dot org

305
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>slash donate. Well, you know, Mark, obviously, when I talk

306
00:16:07.879 --> 00:16:11.559
<v Speaker 1>about sort of teflon candidates, let's talk about the Cornyn

307
00:16:11.600 --> 00:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Paxton race for US Senate. We you know, I know

308
00:16:16.360 --> 00:16:18.759
<v Speaker 1>you've talked to John Cornyn plenty of times in your career.

309
00:16:18.799 --> 00:16:21.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm you know, our long time.

310
00:16:21.919 --> 00:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>US senator facing the toughest primary of his career. What

311
00:16:27.279 --> 00:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are you sort of reading in the tea leaves there

312
00:16:29.120 --> 00:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and or by Tilei's I mean very clear polling that

313
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:34.679
<v Speaker 1>he is falling behind.

314
00:16:35.000 --> 00:16:40.279
<v Speaker 5>He Gosh, this is we could do five episodes on

315
00:16:40.799 --> 00:16:44.360
<v Speaker 5>this alone. Cornan has been a fixture for a really

316
00:16:44.399 --> 00:16:49.120
<v Speaker 5>long time. Conservative callers have been calling me for a

317
00:16:49.240 --> 00:16:52.679
<v Speaker 5>very long time talking about how dissatisfying they are with Cornyn.

318
00:16:53.080 --> 00:16:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Surely this time we're going to primary him. Surely, this

319
00:16:55.840 --> 00:16:58.759
<v Speaker 5>time there's going to be a more bold conservative. And

320
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:02.399
<v Speaker 5>this is before the ascendants. Yere Trump and it simply

321
00:17:02.879 --> 00:17:06.799
<v Speaker 5>never ever happened. Was it Steve Stockman who came within

322
00:17:07.079 --> 00:17:10.480
<v Speaker 5>forty of him in twenty fourteen or so, That's as

323
00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:16.119
<v Speaker 5>close as anybody's gotten. He's been untouchable. Now, nobody has

324
00:17:16.119 --> 00:17:21.240
<v Speaker 5>been running against him named Ken Paxton. So let's go chronologically.

325
00:17:22.039 --> 00:17:25.440
<v Speaker 5>If we're talking a few months ago, the Attorney General

326
00:17:26.039 --> 00:17:29.039
<v Speaker 5>is someone who has taken some slings and arrows, been

327
00:17:29.039 --> 00:17:34.000
<v Speaker 5>through some controversies, and emerged virtually unscathed. You could not

328
00:17:34.240 --> 00:17:38.359
<v Speaker 5>find somebody who is a staunch Packston supporter who said,

329
00:17:39.039 --> 00:17:43.160
<v Speaker 5>some of this tax stuff, I'm out, some of this

330
00:17:43.200 --> 00:17:45.599
<v Speaker 5>courtroom stuff, I'm out. Even some of the personal stuff,

331
00:17:45.640 --> 00:17:48.119
<v Speaker 5>I'm out. You could not find that. But that was

332
00:17:48.359 --> 00:17:52.200
<v Speaker 5>very three months ago. Speaking of change, you could say

333
00:17:52.519 --> 00:17:56.400
<v Speaker 5>things have changed. So now with Angela having filed for divorce,

334
00:17:56.559 --> 00:17:59.480
<v Speaker 5>and with the corn And team clearly willing to come

335
00:17:59.480 --> 00:18:03.319
<v Speaker 5>out with some I mean brutal as coming after the

336
00:18:03.680 --> 00:18:06.119
<v Speaker 5>well brutal and accurate. That's what makes them so brutal

337
00:18:07.079 --> 00:18:09.960
<v Speaker 5>about the personal stuff. The big X factor here, the

338
00:18:10.000 --> 00:18:14.400
<v Speaker 5>big variable is how much will that hurt? Can it

339
00:18:14.480 --> 00:18:17.400
<v Speaker 5>can't not hurt him? If it's only one or two

340
00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:19.680
<v Speaker 5>percent of people who go, dude, I love you, but

341
00:18:19.759 --> 00:18:24.279
<v Speaker 5>I'm out, then of course he's still viable. Some internal polling,

342
00:18:24.279 --> 00:18:26.640
<v Speaker 5>which is almost always useless when Kennedi's go, oh, I've

343
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:28.839
<v Speaker 5>got my own polling, Sure you do. They tell you

344
00:18:28.920 --> 00:18:30.920
<v Speaker 5>what you want to hear. He had like a twenty

345
00:18:30.960 --> 00:18:34.559
<v Speaker 5>point lead on Corny, and I think the ut Tyler

346
00:18:34.599 --> 00:18:37.839
<v Speaker 5>people came out some weeks ago and showed it as

347
00:18:37.920 --> 00:18:40.759
<v Speaker 5>roughly a ten point lead, but that was before all

348
00:18:40.960 --> 00:18:43.559
<v Speaker 5>of this. I think it'd be a good season for

349
00:18:43.599 --> 00:18:45.960
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of polling, like right now, to see

350
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:48.400
<v Speaker 5>if it were more like eight or nine, or more

351
00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:51.279
<v Speaker 5>like one or two, or if the leads evaporated completely.

352
00:18:51.319 --> 00:18:54.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't believe it had as as this whole, messy, unfortunate,

353
00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:58.319
<v Speaker 5>sad story played out. I believe you mean, the least

354
00:18:58.319 --> 00:19:01.640
<v Speaker 5>scientific thing in the world is talk show calls and Twitter.

355
00:19:01.880 --> 00:19:04.319
<v Speaker 5>But they're interesting, they're anecdotal. You find out what a

356
00:19:04.480 --> 00:19:07.279
<v Speaker 5>smattering of people think. And I said, listen, if you

357
00:19:07.440 --> 00:19:10.759
<v Speaker 5>have been a strong Packston supporter, but this is just

358
00:19:10.839 --> 00:19:13.400
<v Speaker 5>a bridge too far. I had always said. One of

359
00:19:13.400 --> 00:19:16.559
<v Speaker 5>the things I always said is if Angela forgives him,

360
00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:19.400
<v Speaker 5>then who are we to continue? Who is anybody to

361
00:19:19.440 --> 00:19:23.839
<v Speaker 5>continue to bog down in the personal stuff? Well, Ken

362
00:19:23.880 --> 00:19:27.680
<v Speaker 5>can't use that anymore, his supporters can't use that anymore.

363
00:19:28.000 --> 00:19:30.160
<v Speaker 5>So my goal was to find out how much it mattered.

364
00:19:30.480 --> 00:19:32.200
<v Speaker 5>And in a few days of calls and a few

365
00:19:32.240 --> 00:19:35.480
<v Speaker 5>days of Twitter, polls for whatever they're worth. It just

366
00:19:36.079 --> 00:19:39.000
<v Speaker 5>it looked like almost nothing. Now I know that it's

367
00:19:39.039 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 5>not nothing. There has to be a voter defined by

368
00:19:43.319 --> 00:19:47.319
<v Speaker 5>general supportive Paxton, even a strong supportive Paxton. But this

369
00:19:47.519 --> 00:19:51.079
<v Speaker 5>is just too much. My friends at Texas Values, Jonathan

370
00:19:51.160 --> 00:19:54.519
<v Speaker 5>Sign's wonderful group, they've been aligned with Paxton on issue

371
00:19:54.559 --> 00:19:56.960
<v Speaker 5>after issue after issue after issue. But one of the

372
00:19:57.000 --> 00:19:59.480
<v Speaker 5>things that means a lot to them at Texas Values,

373
00:19:59.519 --> 00:20:02.039
<v Speaker 5>hence the name, is the sanctity of marriage. And so

374
00:20:02.160 --> 00:20:05.039
<v Speaker 5>they pulled their endorsement. And that's not like they've endorsed

375
00:20:05.079 --> 00:20:07.359
<v Speaker 5>Corn in or they don't want Ken to win, but

376
00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:11.880
<v Speaker 5>they just cannot have their endorsement there in their literature

377
00:20:11.960 --> 00:20:15.480
<v Speaker 5>for him. That can't be your best day on the

378
00:20:15.480 --> 00:20:18.880
<v Speaker 5>campaign trail. But if it is just a small bit

379
00:20:18.920 --> 00:20:21.799
<v Speaker 5>of damage, which it may be, I'll never forget one

380
00:20:21.799 --> 00:20:23.839
<v Speaker 5>of the text We have a text line. We got calls.

381
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:26.079
<v Speaker 5>There too many ways to get hold of me these days.

382
00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:30.200
<v Speaker 5>But somebody wrote me and said, Mark, there's no amount

383
00:20:30.240 --> 00:20:34.319
<v Speaker 5>of Paxton misbehavior that makes John corn unacceptable. And now

384
00:20:34.359 --> 00:20:38.599
<v Speaker 5>this is a pretty maga based, grassroots conservative thing to say.

385
00:20:38.839 --> 00:20:42.519
<v Speaker 5>But if that's prevalent, of course, Paxton remains viable now.

386
00:20:42.599 --> 00:20:45.799
<v Speaker 5>Is this me predicting that he will win. Absolutely not,

387
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:50.119
<v Speaker 5>because I think even that ten point lead is phony.

388
00:20:50.440 --> 00:20:54.200
<v Speaker 5>This will be a close race, It will be hard fought,

389
00:20:54.400 --> 00:20:59.519
<v Speaker 5>and the driving factor will be who offers himself up

390
00:21:00.160 --> 00:21:04.519
<v Speaker 5>as the most reliable Trump ally in the remainder of

391
00:21:04.519 --> 00:21:09.799
<v Speaker 5>this Trump term. Paxton's credentials are absolutely rock star quality

392
00:21:09.839 --> 00:21:12.640
<v Speaker 5>on that, but the person, the personal stuff may be

393
00:21:12.759 --> 00:21:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a drag on that. For Cornan, around

394
00:21:15.519 --> 00:21:18.480
<v Speaker 5>whom there has been interest doubt. I don't think Cornan

395
00:21:18.720 --> 00:21:20.880
<v Speaker 5>likes guns as much as he wants you to think

396
00:21:20.880 --> 00:21:24.039
<v Speaker 5>he does. He certainly didn't. He certainly did not like

397
00:21:24.079 --> 00:21:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Trump as much as he now seems to like him.

398
00:21:27.079 --> 00:21:32.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there is zero distance Cornyan is Trump. Ever

399
00:21:32.279 --> 00:21:35.960
<v Speaker 5>since Trump won, it has been a genius bit of positioning.

400
00:21:36.359 --> 00:21:40.599
<v Speaker 5>All the ads show Cornyan and Trump. Cornyan loves Trump.

401
00:21:40.680 --> 00:21:43.720
<v Speaker 5>Trump loves Cornyn. He's one of the most valuable allies

402
00:21:43.759 --> 00:21:46.599
<v Speaker 5>he has in the in the Senate. Quick thing, and

403
00:21:46.640 --> 00:21:49.160
<v Speaker 5>I'll shut up. I'm sorry, I don't. I don't know

404
00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:53.839
<v Speaker 5>if they'll be an endorsement. Would would would Trump endorse Paxton?

405
00:21:54.599 --> 00:21:57.359
<v Speaker 5>It looked for a while, you know, six months ago. Yeah, Well,

406
00:21:57.359 --> 00:21:59.880
<v Speaker 5>sure they've been friends forever, but would would he want

407
00:21:59.880 --> 00:22:02.400
<v Speaker 5>to issue that kind of a slap to a sitting

408
00:22:02.519 --> 00:22:06.000
<v Speaker 5>senator who's very important to him now? And if Trump

409
00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:09.480
<v Speaker 5>endorses Cornyn, WHOA, there's a large part of the base

410
00:22:09.519 --> 00:22:12.319
<v Speaker 5>that will go into open revolt. So that seems to

411
00:22:12.359 --> 00:22:14.960
<v Speaker 5>me like a race where Trump is able to say, Ken,

412
00:22:15.039 --> 00:22:18.680
<v Speaker 5>I've loved him forever, good friend, Cornyn, valuable, ally important guy,

413
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:20.400
<v Speaker 5>I love him and just kind of stay out of

414
00:22:20.480 --> 00:22:23.079
<v Speaker 5>it and let voters have their say. And what will

415
00:22:23.079 --> 00:22:26.160
<v Speaker 5>that say be. I have no idea. It will be

416
00:22:26.200 --> 00:22:29.680
<v Speaker 5>a measure of how much rockstar power Action is able

417
00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:32.240
<v Speaker 5>to maintain, and I think it's going to be considerable

418
00:22:32.599 --> 00:22:35.720
<v Speaker 5>versus how good a job Cornyn will do of convincing

419
00:22:35.799 --> 00:22:39.599
<v Speaker 5>voters that he will absolutely be a Trump ballet. And

420
00:22:39.640 --> 00:22:42.519
<v Speaker 5>he's done it, quite frankly, a wonderful job of doing that.

421
00:22:42.960 --> 00:22:44.799
<v Speaker 5>So that's where it lays. I think it's a close

422
00:22:44.880 --> 00:22:48.079
<v Speaker 5>race and one of those wonderful things that are impossible

423
00:22:48.079 --> 00:22:48.759
<v Speaker 5>to call right now.

424
00:22:49.359 --> 00:22:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I mean I think what you were saying

425
00:22:51.720 --> 00:22:53.680
<v Speaker 4>there about the you know, the voters who have that

426
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:57.680
<v Speaker 4>view that you know, whatever Paxson's behavior is you know,

427
00:22:58.079 --> 00:23:01.519
<v Speaker 4>it's it's irrelevant in assessing whether Cornyn, you know, whether

428
00:23:01.559 --> 00:23:03.599
<v Speaker 4>they'll ever support Cornan. I think that's kind of the

429
00:23:04.160 --> 00:23:07.599
<v Speaker 4>that encapsulates the challenge that Cornan is facing right now.

430
00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:09.799
<v Speaker 4>And I guess it also gets to the other point

431
00:23:09.839 --> 00:23:13.880
<v Speaker 4>about you know, electability and kind of the argument that

432
00:23:15.119 --> 00:23:17.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think this could potentially play into Trump's

433
00:23:17.960 --> 00:23:19.920
<v Speaker 4>decision about whether to get involved.

434
00:23:20.160 --> 00:23:22.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, he wants to maintain the Senate.

435
00:23:22.559 --> 00:23:25.160
<v Speaker 4>There's sort of this view out there that you know,

436
00:23:25.759 --> 00:23:29.319
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe Paxton still still wins, but the National

437
00:23:29.359 --> 00:23:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Republicans have to put their resources more so in Texas

438
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:35.799
<v Speaker 4>than they would like, and that takes away from you know,

439
00:23:35.880 --> 00:23:39.279
<v Speaker 4>North Carolina, other states. I mean, I guess I'm curious

440
00:23:39.319 --> 00:23:43.319
<v Speaker 4>Mark if you have any thoughts on the electability question

441
00:23:43.440 --> 00:23:46.079
<v Speaker 4>and sort of you know, Ken Paxton. I think you

442
00:23:46.119 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 4>can look at any data point you want to sort

443
00:23:48.759 --> 00:23:52.079
<v Speaker 4>of justify your view. I mean, he was, you know,

444
00:23:52.240 --> 00:23:54.839
<v Speaker 4>he came within striking distance of losing in twenty eighteen,

445
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:57.559
<v Speaker 4>but on the other hand, twenty twenty two, he wins

446
00:23:57.559 --> 00:24:01.799
<v Speaker 4>by a comfortable, I think ten point margin. So given

447
00:24:01.880 --> 00:24:04.839
<v Speaker 4>all the kind of the data points swirling around and

448
00:24:04.880 --> 00:24:07.920
<v Speaker 4>what you've heard. I mean, do you feel like Paxton

449
00:24:08.119 --> 00:24:11.559
<v Speaker 4>presents an electability problem for Republicans if he's the nominee

450
00:24:12.599 --> 00:24:14.359
<v Speaker 4>or not?

451
00:24:14.359 --> 00:24:18.319
<v Speaker 5>Not as much of one as the Corn team would

452
00:24:18.359 --> 00:24:21.319
<v Speaker 5>have you believe. So, so, what does Corn bring to

453
00:24:21.319 --> 00:24:25.119
<v Speaker 5>the table a track record of being thoroughly palatable to

454
00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:29.160
<v Speaker 5>a sufficient number of Republicans to win comfortably ever since

455
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:33.599
<v Speaker 5>he's been running. Who doesn't want that? There are people

456
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:36.319
<v Speaker 5>who want to say that if Paxton is the nominee

457
00:24:36.720 --> 00:24:40.079
<v Speaker 5>that he will be a lot more vulnerable. I don't

458
00:24:40.119 --> 00:24:44.440
<v Speaker 5>know that that's true. Is it mathematically? Do the data

459
00:24:44.519 --> 00:24:48.319
<v Speaker 5>points suggest that cornin First of all, either one of

460
00:24:48.359 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Speaker 5>these guys beats Colin all read period paragraph, end of story.

461
00:24:52.839 --> 00:24:55.519
<v Speaker 5>There's zero chance of a Democrat winning. To see, the

462
00:24:55.599 --> 00:24:58.759
<v Speaker 5>question is how big will the Republican margin be now?

463
00:24:58.799 --> 00:25:02.599
<v Speaker 5>And listen, all those of us in conservative land we

464
00:25:02.640 --> 00:25:06.079
<v Speaker 5>still remember and are still stung and frightened by how

465
00:25:06.160 --> 00:25:09.640
<v Speaker 5>freakishly close Beto came to Ted Cruz in twenty eighteen.

466
00:25:09.640 --> 00:25:11.319
<v Speaker 5>I mean, how in the world did that even happen?

467
00:25:11.440 --> 00:25:13.559
<v Speaker 5>And it makes us think you never can tell when

468
00:25:13.599 --> 00:25:17.440
<v Speaker 5>it might happen again. Colin all Read, ain't betto? Is

469
00:25:17.640 --> 00:25:20.559
<v Speaker 5>what comforts me at night. But here's how this comes.

470
00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:22.960
<v Speaker 5>With the data points and the notion of how either

471
00:25:22.960 --> 00:25:26.400
<v Speaker 5>of them might go, it is possible, in fact probable,

472
00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:30.440
<v Speaker 5>that Cornyn would win by a slightly larger margin than

473
00:25:30.559 --> 00:25:34.519
<v Speaker 5>Paxton would. But since if I'm right that there's no

474
00:25:34.599 --> 00:25:37.880
<v Speaker 5>chance of a democratic victory, go with whomever you like.

475
00:25:37.920 --> 00:25:40.799
<v Speaker 5>It's not one of those situations where well, we like

476
00:25:40.880 --> 00:25:44.960
<v Speaker 5>this Republican but he might lose. That's just simply not

477
00:25:45.119 --> 00:25:48.640
<v Speaker 5>the case. Here's here are the variables. No matter, this

478
00:25:48.720 --> 00:25:51.960
<v Speaker 5>is going to be one of the ugliest, most expensive, messy,

479
00:25:52.839 --> 00:25:57.160
<v Speaker 5>terrible primaries in the history of the stick. Great business

480
00:25:57.160 --> 00:25:59.000
<v Speaker 5>for me and the talk show, been great business for you,

481
00:25:59.039 --> 00:26:01.759
<v Speaker 5>all those of us who are in punditry and analysis.

482
00:26:01.839 --> 00:26:04.079
<v Speaker 5>You know, the gods will be smiling, but there'll be

483
00:26:04.160 --> 00:26:06.160
<v Speaker 5>so much blood on the walls by the time they're done.

484
00:26:07.240 --> 00:26:10.759
<v Speaker 5>And whoever loses, they're going to be a lot of

485
00:26:10.799 --> 00:26:14.119
<v Speaker 5>people who are really upset the people who voted for

486
00:26:14.440 --> 00:26:17.240
<v Speaker 5>If Paxton wins, the people who voted for Cornyn are

487
00:26:17.240 --> 00:26:20.079
<v Speaker 5>going to have to be wheedled and cajoled and attracted

488
00:26:20.240 --> 00:26:23.599
<v Speaker 5>to come over and vote for Paxton. Using the logic

489
00:26:23.839 --> 00:26:26.559
<v Speaker 5>we can't have a Democrat win, remember betto, We can't

490
00:26:26.640 --> 00:26:28.680
<v Speaker 5>have that happen again. And I think that would be

491
00:26:28.799 --> 00:26:33.200
<v Speaker 5>largely successful if Cornin fends off the Paxton challenge. Look

492
00:26:33.200 --> 00:26:36.599
<v Speaker 5>Out the Paxton people who didn't like Cornan before and

493
00:26:36.680 --> 00:26:39.000
<v Speaker 5>are really going to be bitter about him now are

494
00:26:39.079 --> 00:26:42.680
<v Speaker 5>going to have to get that same appeal message like, Okay,

495
00:26:42.720 --> 00:26:46.480
<v Speaker 5>the primary is over. It was rough, it was nasty,

496
00:26:47.000 --> 00:26:49.559
<v Speaker 5>but now we got to gather together as Republicans do

497
00:26:49.640 --> 00:26:51.960
<v Speaker 5>what we're supposed to do, and that's beat Democrats. And

498
00:26:52.039 --> 00:26:54.039
<v Speaker 5>so you've got to come over and find a way

499
00:26:54.079 --> 00:26:55.960
<v Speaker 5>to hold your nose if you view it as holding

500
00:26:55.960 --> 00:26:59.599
<v Speaker 5>your nose and support John Cornyn anyway, that I believe

501
00:26:59.640 --> 00:27:02.960
<v Speaker 5>is a harder sell, which is why Cornyn would probably

502
00:27:03.640 --> 00:27:07.039
<v Speaker 5>if I'm just packing crazy predictive numbers, I think Cornyan

503
00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:15.279
<v Speaker 5>wins by eight and packs and wins by four. But again,

504
00:27:15.519 --> 00:27:19.160
<v Speaker 5>that's at the electron right now. If something if Cornyan's

505
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:22.960
<v Speaker 5>support for Trump is somehow drawn into doubt, if the

506
00:27:23.119 --> 00:27:25.640
<v Speaker 5>if the personal stuff starts to take hold with Ken

507
00:27:25.720 --> 00:27:28.279
<v Speaker 5>in a way that it's not doing right now, then

508
00:27:28.359 --> 00:27:31.759
<v Speaker 5>either of those figures is shiftable. Yeah.

509
00:27:31.759 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just feel like We've heard this argument

510
00:27:33.440 --> 00:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot from DEM's right of you know, I mean

511
00:27:36.440 --> 00:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that was almost the argument that like George P. Bush

512
00:27:39.279 --> 00:27:41.599
<v Speaker 1>and if Husman we're making, which is, you know, we

513
00:27:41.640 --> 00:27:44.759
<v Speaker 1>can't put him up because he'll lose to a Democrat.

514
00:27:45.039 --> 00:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Obviously he won handily, so it does.

515
00:27:49.240 --> 00:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Again, a lot can change, but it's sort of like

516
00:27:51.519 --> 00:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump with Pax, a lot would have to

517
00:27:54.200 --> 00:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>change if nothing has sort of penetrated his base. Yet,

518
00:27:58.759 --> 00:28:03.079
<v Speaker 1>let's turn briefly to the who the heir apparent to

519
00:28:03.200 --> 00:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General's office. We're gonna have our first open

520
00:28:06.319 --> 00:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>GOP primary for Attorney General in a decade, the first

521
00:28:10.720 --> 00:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>without you know, packs the specter of Paxton hanging over it.

522
00:28:14.799 --> 00:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So well, let me say this, I think the specter

523
00:28:17.480 --> 00:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of Paxton is hanging over this race pretty effectively. But yes,

524
00:28:21.920 --> 00:28:25.559
<v Speaker 1>without your yeah, without the embodiment of Paxton in the race.

525
00:28:25.759 --> 00:28:29.519
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we've talked about this on the podcast before,

526
00:28:29.559 --> 00:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but the field for the GOP looks pretty set with

527
00:28:34.200 --> 00:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Senator Mays Middleton, who is self funding ten

528
00:28:37.119 --> 00:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in his campaign so far, State Senator Joan

529
00:28:40.519 --> 00:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Huffman sort of a little bit more of the establishment,

530
00:28:43.480 --> 00:28:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Houston base and Aaron Wrights, who is former assistant Attorney

531
00:28:49.640 --> 00:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>General to Ken Paxton, former DOJ attorney, getting a lot

532
00:28:53.960 --> 00:28:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of money nowhere near ten million dollars, but really trying

533
00:28:58.400 --> 00:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to carve out his lane as the Paxton air apparent

534
00:29:03.359 --> 00:29:06.079
<v Speaker 1>mark just to begin with, like what you know in

535
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:09.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of your listeners and people you're talking to? Is

536
00:29:09.160 --> 00:29:12.559
<v Speaker 1>there awareness about this campaign? Is there awareness about these candidates?

537
00:29:12.559 --> 00:29:14.079
<v Speaker 1>What's the name recognition issue?

538
00:29:14.079 --> 00:29:19.319
<v Speaker 5>Here? As as state senators, Joan Huffman and May's Middleton

539
00:29:19.400 --> 00:29:21.480
<v Speaker 5>start out with an advantage because no one knows who

540
00:29:21.480 --> 00:29:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Aaron Rights is, or they or they didn't until a

541
00:29:23.440 --> 00:29:26.559
<v Speaker 5>few weeks to you they know now if they pay

542
00:29:26.599 --> 00:29:28.599
<v Speaker 5>some attention to social media and they've been watching some

543
00:29:28.640 --> 00:29:31.319
<v Speaker 5>of his media appearances, that they take a look at

544
00:29:31.400 --> 00:29:34.319
<v Speaker 5>Ken's endorsement of him, which is not a small thing.

545
00:29:35.400 --> 00:29:38.720
<v Speaker 5>The way this one shakes out right now is is

546
00:29:38.799 --> 00:29:41.039
<v Speaker 5>Joan Huffman is going to get a lot of the

547
00:29:41.079 --> 00:29:47.160
<v Speaker 5>GOP establishment Ava Guzman style vote. May's Middleton is a

548
00:29:47.720 --> 00:29:51.839
<v Speaker 5>better conservative than Joan Huffman is. But is he is

549
00:29:51.839 --> 00:29:54.440
<v Speaker 5>he Paxton friendly enough? Is he does he kind of

550
00:29:54.480 --> 00:29:57.839
<v Speaker 5>maga grassroots enough? Not that that's gonna not the best

551
00:29:57.960 --> 00:30:00.680
<v Speaker 5>ninety percent of Texas Republican voters. I mean, if it

552
00:30:00.680 --> 00:30:03.799
<v Speaker 5>were a Cornon wouldn't have been so unbeatable for low

553
00:30:03.839 --> 00:30:09.359
<v Speaker 5>these many years. But with Aaron Wrights around, I've spoken

554
00:30:09.400 --> 00:30:11.359
<v Speaker 5>to this gentleman a couple of times, and he has

555
00:30:11.759 --> 00:30:15.440
<v Speaker 5>like no fear. He's just jumping in there and saying

556
00:30:15.960 --> 00:30:19.680
<v Speaker 5>and being very vocal about the very Pacstonian kinds of

557
00:30:19.720 --> 00:30:21.880
<v Speaker 5>things that he's going to do. He was on I

558
00:30:21.880 --> 00:30:25.279
<v Speaker 5>think a station in Austin recently. I just to clip

559
00:30:25.319 --> 00:30:28.000
<v Speaker 5>the other day. I'm coming after these blue cities. They're

560
00:30:28.039 --> 00:30:29.559
<v Speaker 5>not going to be able to do these guys. I mean,

561
00:30:29.640 --> 00:30:35.000
<v Speaker 5>it sounded like the absolute linear continuation of the Paxton

562
00:30:35.079 --> 00:30:37.759
<v Speaker 5>style of being Attorney General. I don't know that May's

563
00:30:37.759 --> 00:30:40.079
<v Speaker 5>Middleton is ever going to say that that I'm going

564
00:30:40.200 --> 00:30:44.359
<v Speaker 5>to do everything Paxton did, at least in office. I

565
00:30:44.440 --> 00:30:46.640
<v Speaker 5>know that Johan Hubban's not going to say anything like that.

566
00:30:47.000 --> 00:30:52.119
<v Speaker 5>So the variable will be how much do Texas voters

567
00:30:52.119 --> 00:30:54.200
<v Speaker 5>how much do Republican first in the primary. Of course,

568
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:59.359
<v Speaker 5>how much do Texas Republican voters want an absolute continuation

569
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:03.160
<v Speaker 5>of packs to style policies. There's a lot of evidence

570
00:31:03.200 --> 00:31:07.240
<v Speaker 5>that that's exactly what the Republican flavor is going to be.

571
00:31:08.319 --> 00:31:13.039
<v Speaker 5>But for fundraising familiarity, name recognition, both May's Middleton and

572
00:31:13.119 --> 00:31:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Johan Huffman have more. So Aaron Rights has all the

573
00:31:16.559 --> 00:31:19.839
<v Speaker 5>all the right ingredients. He is he certainly has you know,

574
00:31:19.880 --> 00:31:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the right talking points, but still an upill climb.

575
00:31:23.319 --> 00:31:23.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

576
00:31:23.599 --> 00:31:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it also strikes me as kind of a

577
00:31:26.480 --> 00:31:30.240
<v Speaker 4>the ultimate test of whether voters still care about you know,

578
00:31:30.559 --> 00:31:33.160
<v Speaker 4>experience and whether you know, kind of that as a

579
00:31:33.160 --> 00:31:36.920
<v Speaker 4>campaign pitch. You look at Aaron Wrights kind of pitching

580
00:31:36.960 --> 00:31:39.720
<v Speaker 4>himself as the you know, he was the offensive coordinator

581
00:31:39.799 --> 00:31:43.319
<v Speaker 4>under Paxton, if you like what Packson was doing suing

582
00:31:43.319 --> 00:31:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the Biden administration. I was at the center of that.

583
00:31:47.519 --> 00:31:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Joan Huffman kind of making a similar but different experience

584
00:31:52.160 --> 00:31:55.160
<v Speaker 4>based argument talking about her you know, time as a

585
00:31:55.240 --> 00:31:58.720
<v Speaker 4>judge and prosecutor, you know, overseeing a bunch of important

586
00:31:58.720 --> 00:32:02.920
<v Speaker 4>committees in the Senate. And you know, Middleton obviously has

587
00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:04.960
<v Speaker 4>that experience in the Senate as well, but he doesn't

588
00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:10.200
<v Speaker 4>have that type of you know, Aaron Wright's style legal credentials,

589
00:32:10.240 --> 00:32:13.599
<v Speaker 4>just being sort of enmeshed in this conservative legal movement.

590
00:32:13.960 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 4>But he does have ten million dollars. So I think

591
00:32:16.559 --> 00:32:19.880
<v Speaker 4>it's it's kind of the ultimate test of whether you

592
00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:23.559
<v Speaker 4>know the voters care enough about experience to overcome just

593
00:32:23.839 --> 00:32:28.480
<v Speaker 4>a seemingly on its face insurmountable money advantage.

594
00:32:28.799 --> 00:32:30.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm going to make an observation about experience.

595
00:32:31.759 --> 00:32:37.000
<v Speaker 5>It has never mattered less, and I don't in Republican

596
00:32:37.079 --> 00:32:40.519
<v Speaker 5>Land particularly, and the evidence of it is there every day.

597
00:32:40.920 --> 00:32:42.920
<v Speaker 5>There's a guy who ran for president who had no

598
00:32:43.000 --> 00:32:46.559
<v Speaker 5>political experience and got more passion than anybody since Reagan.

599
00:32:46.680 --> 00:32:49.240
<v Speaker 5>His name is Donald Trump. I mean, obviously experience meant

600
00:32:49.279 --> 00:32:51.480
<v Speaker 5>something for two point zero because he had been president,

601
00:32:51.599 --> 00:32:53.319
<v Speaker 5>which is why two point zero is even better than

602
00:32:53.400 --> 00:32:59.279
<v Speaker 5>one point zero. He knows Washington now. But the Senator Cornyn,

603
00:32:59.319 --> 00:33:01.640
<v Speaker 5>when I talked to him, always it talks about you know,

604
00:33:01.839 --> 00:33:04.200
<v Speaker 5>and I say, listen, you and Ken, it seems like

605
00:33:04.240 --> 00:33:06.640
<v Speaker 5>you're going to if you indeed have become the Trump

606
00:33:06.680 --> 00:33:09.599
<v Speaker 5>acolyte that you offer yourself to be. Isn't it pretty

607
00:33:09.599 --> 00:33:12.079
<v Speaker 5>true that you and Ken will have just about the

608
00:33:12.079 --> 00:33:13.839
<v Speaker 5>same voting record. I mean, what's really going to be

609
00:33:13.880 --> 00:33:16.039
<v Speaker 5>the difference between what kind of cenator you will be

610
00:33:16.480 --> 00:33:18.759
<v Speaker 5>and the corn and response is very, very often. I

611
00:33:18.839 --> 00:33:22.720
<v Speaker 5>have all this experience, experience, experience, experience. I won't say

612
00:33:22.759 --> 00:33:25.960
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't matter. Oly matter. Experience is a good thing

613
00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:29.279
<v Speaker 5>to have. But what Republican voters in particular looking for

614
00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:32.839
<v Speaker 5>is how's your fight? How much will you fight? What

615
00:33:32.920 --> 00:33:35.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of energy do you bring? Do you draw? Do

616
00:33:35.920 --> 00:33:38.599
<v Speaker 5>you have the right enemies? I mean, do you have

617
00:33:38.720 --> 00:33:43.559
<v Speaker 5>your eye focused on battles against wotness, battles against profligate spending,

618
00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:50.440
<v Speaker 5>battles against you know, unconstitutional governance. If you've got your

619
00:33:50.519 --> 00:33:53.519
<v Speaker 5>eyes clear about that. Not only do we not care

620
00:33:53.599 --> 00:33:56.319
<v Speaker 5>that you don't have experience, we love that you've come

621
00:33:56.359 --> 00:33:58.720
<v Speaker 5>from the private sector because I think there's a kind

622
00:33:58.759 --> 00:34:00.480
<v Speaker 5>of what we've had it up to our eyeball with

623
00:34:00.599 --> 00:34:03.720
<v Speaker 5>career politician little bitner for twenty five years. Big deal.

624
00:34:03.960 --> 00:34:06.319
<v Speaker 5>Give me somebody with a with a fresh eye, a

625
00:34:06.359 --> 00:34:09.519
<v Speaker 5>fresh take on things. So I'll just say that experience

626
00:34:09.559 --> 00:34:11.519
<v Speaker 5>is never a bad thing to have. But I don't

627
00:34:11.519 --> 00:34:13.400
<v Speaker 5>know when it's ever been less important.

628
00:34:14.119 --> 00:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>An experience is all relative, right, I mean, you've got

629
00:34:17.239 --> 00:34:19.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the AGS race is a great example of this.

630
00:34:19.239 --> 00:34:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got Aaron Wright sort of portraying himself as the

631
00:34:21.280 --> 00:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>political outsider and also the one experienced, you know, as

632
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator that sort of backs someone like Senator

633
00:34:29.840 --> 00:34:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Middleton into a corner of you know, well, his experience

634
00:34:32.639 --> 00:34:36.039
<v Speaker 1>is in you know, state legislating, which is sort of

635
00:34:37.159 --> 00:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>almost the worst of both in the eyes.

636
00:34:39.519 --> 00:34:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Of the republicability.

637
00:34:41.320 --> 00:34:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Right.

638
00:34:41.559 --> 00:34:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I will say, you know, Center Middleton has

639
00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten a ton of support from other members of the legislature,

640
00:34:47.480 --> 00:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>many of whom are grassroots Republicans.

641
00:34:49.320 --> 00:34:51.719
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I think there's sort.

642
00:34:51.559 --> 00:34:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Of the the social media, the attacking in TV ads,

643
00:34:56.760 --> 00:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>TV hits, radio hits like that makes a huge difference

644
00:35:00.400 --> 00:35:03.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of name recognition. And then there's sort of

645
00:35:03.199 --> 00:35:06.039
<v Speaker 1>the the underground world in which a lot of politics

646
00:35:06.079 --> 00:35:08.639
<v Speaker 1>happens that's less obvious to the to the naked eye.

647
00:35:08.760 --> 00:35:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I think where I do think Center Middleton is pretty

648
00:35:13.039 --> 00:35:18.519
<v Speaker 1>experienced in working in those circles or the GOP donor yeah. Absolutely, Yeah,

649
00:35:18.840 --> 00:35:21.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could obviously get into a lot of

650
00:35:21.079 --> 00:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>other races, but we will sort of leave it there.

651
00:35:23.440 --> 00:35:25.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Mark, just big picture, you.

652
00:35:25.519 --> 00:35:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Know, what are you what sort of your outlook for Republicans,

653
00:35:29.920 --> 00:35:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, between now and when we when we get

654
00:35:32.719 --> 00:35:35.199
<v Speaker 1>up to that primary and then ultimately general, I mean,

655
00:35:35.679 --> 00:35:37.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are the variables you're keeping an eye on.

656
00:35:40.199 --> 00:35:43.480
<v Speaker 5>If if recent history is a prologue and once things

657
00:35:43.480 --> 00:35:46.119
<v Speaker 5>have been going in a certain way, only two things

658
00:35:46.119 --> 00:35:48.639
<v Speaker 5>can happen. They can continue in that certain way, or

659
00:35:48.679 --> 00:35:53.599
<v Speaker 5>the pendulum can start to swing back. Paxton remains a

660
00:35:53.679 --> 00:35:55.719
<v Speaker 5>rock star in terms of what he has done. The

661
00:35:55.760 --> 00:35:58.159
<v Speaker 5>personal stuff is a big We'll see whether it's a

662
00:35:58.239 --> 00:36:01.079
<v Speaker 5>Chinese water torture. If he can say but death one

663
00:36:01.079 --> 00:36:05.480
<v Speaker 5>thousand cuts, let's go with that over time. If it

664
00:36:05.519 --> 00:36:07.320
<v Speaker 5>starts to wear him down, I don't know. I don't

665
00:36:07.360 --> 00:36:10.360
<v Speaker 5>think that it will. What he has done is sufficiently

666
00:36:10.400 --> 00:36:12.519
<v Speaker 5>impactful that I think it's the kind of thing that

667
00:36:12.559 --> 00:36:16.559
<v Speaker 5>gives Aaron Wright a chance in a battle where he

668
00:36:16.639 --> 00:36:19.599
<v Speaker 5>would ordinarily have a big struggle against Tufman in Middleton.

669
00:36:19.599 --> 00:36:21.920
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be an interesting three way race. Dan

670
00:36:21.960 --> 00:36:26.239
<v Speaker 5>Patrick remains just a force of nature. He is ageless.

671
00:36:26.280 --> 00:36:28.159
<v Speaker 5>He's out there even things that are that are not

672
00:36:28.199 --> 00:36:31.639
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent popular in the conservative base, the THC band.

673
00:36:31.880 --> 00:36:33.800
<v Speaker 5>He will not let go of that THC band. I

674
00:36:33.840 --> 00:36:36.159
<v Speaker 5>happen to think he's correct about that. But I took

675
00:36:36.159 --> 00:36:38.159
<v Speaker 5>a lot of calls and we remark I love Dan Patrick,

676
00:36:38.199 --> 00:36:40.239
<v Speaker 5>but he's wrong on the THC thing. He doesn't care,

677
00:36:40.440 --> 00:36:43.960
<v Speaker 5>he thinks it's right. He's going for it. Various the

678
00:36:44.039 --> 00:36:47.320
<v Speaker 5>ways in which he has piloted the Senate in a

679
00:36:47.360 --> 00:36:49.519
<v Speaker 5>way that gives the Texas Senate a better sort of

680
00:36:49.920 --> 00:36:52.679
<v Speaker 5>legislative image than the Messy House does. Coming off the

681
00:36:54.119 --> 00:36:58.159
<v Speaker 5>difficult era, Dade feeling, although the Dustin Burroughs era seems

682
00:36:58.159 --> 00:37:01.000
<v Speaker 5>to have gone much much much better, remains a power

683
00:37:01.360 --> 00:37:03.800
<v Speaker 5>and to finish at the top there with Governor Rabbit.

684
00:37:04.039 --> 00:37:06.800
<v Speaker 5>It is not the same Greg Abbott as four or

685
00:37:06.840 --> 00:37:10.199
<v Speaker 5>six or eight years ago. I was not to make

686
00:37:10.239 --> 00:37:12.360
<v Speaker 5>everything a measure of the calls I take or whatever.

687
00:37:12.360 --> 00:37:14.840
<v Speaker 5>But it's the people I talked to it it's the

688
00:37:14.880 --> 00:37:17.280
<v Speaker 5>studies of human nature that I get from doing this

689
00:37:17.360 --> 00:37:21.239
<v Speaker 5>show every day. There was conservative frustration about Abbott to

690
00:37:21.280 --> 00:37:24.519
<v Speaker 5>the extent that when Don Haffins and Alan West ran

691
00:37:24.559 --> 00:37:27.559
<v Speaker 5>against him, I took all kinds of calls from people

692
00:37:27.559 --> 00:37:29.639
<v Speaker 5>who said, hey, Mark Abbot's Abbot's going down.

693
00:37:29.679 --> 00:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Man.

694
00:37:29.880 --> 00:37:32.440
<v Speaker 5>It's either Alan West or Don Hoffines. And by the way,

695
00:37:32.480 --> 00:37:35.760
<v Speaker 5>I love Allan West, I love Don Hopkins. Hupfinds ride

696
00:37:35.760 --> 00:37:38.840
<v Speaker 5>a great campaign. Hop Fines would say something about property taxes,

697
00:37:38.880 --> 00:37:42.199
<v Speaker 5>Abbott would say it the next day. Huff Finds made

698
00:37:42.199 --> 00:37:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Abbott a better candidate four years ago. But I told listeners,

699
00:37:45.840 --> 00:37:48.519
<v Speaker 5>to their chagrin, there was no way Abbott was getting beat.

700
00:37:48.719 --> 00:37:50.159
<v Speaker 5>There was no way in the world either of these

701
00:37:50.159 --> 00:37:53.000
<v Speaker 5>primary challenges would come close to him. Because what you've

702
00:37:53.000 --> 00:37:55.079
<v Speaker 5>got to do, it's the Mark Davis rule of primaries.

703
00:37:55.320 --> 00:37:57.239
<v Speaker 5>The only way you're going to win. It doesn't matter

704
00:37:57.239 --> 00:37:59.519
<v Speaker 5>how awesome you are, how much we love you. You've

705
00:37:59.519 --> 00:38:03.559
<v Speaker 5>got to create a desire to fire the incumbent. That's

706
00:38:03.599 --> 00:38:05.559
<v Speaker 5>what Paxton's got to do. He's got to create it. It

707
00:38:05.519 --> 00:38:08.480
<v Speaker 5>doesn't matter how awesome Paxston is or the great things

708
00:38:08.519 --> 00:38:10.480
<v Speaker 5>he's done in the rock star status he has. I mean,

709
00:38:10.480 --> 00:38:12.519
<v Speaker 5>it's lovely. That's why he's going to come close. But

710
00:38:12.639 --> 00:38:16.639
<v Speaker 5>he will only win if he creates a palpable desire

711
00:38:16.760 --> 00:38:18.519
<v Speaker 5>on the part of a state that's loved him for

712
00:38:18.599 --> 00:38:21.679
<v Speaker 5>two decades to fire John Cornyn. If he can do that,

713
00:38:22.000 --> 00:38:25.159
<v Speaker 5>he wins. If he can't, then he doesn't. The point

714
00:38:25.159 --> 00:38:29.199
<v Speaker 5>being here is that Abbot has read the political room

715
00:38:29.400 --> 00:38:33.599
<v Speaker 5>so well and read and has seen the trumpification of

716
00:38:33.679 --> 00:38:36.639
<v Speaker 5>text at the further trumpification of Texas that I don't

717
00:38:36.639 --> 00:38:43.039
<v Speaker 5>hear a peep of conservative complaint about Abbott anymore at all,

718
00:38:43.079 --> 00:38:45.000
<v Speaker 5>which would seem to indicate, by a long winded way

719
00:38:45.039 --> 00:38:48.880
<v Speaker 5>of saying, that the deeper red status of Texas either

720
00:38:48.960 --> 00:38:52.079
<v Speaker 5>continues or stays where it is, the notion of the

721
00:38:52.079 --> 00:38:56.039
<v Speaker 5>pendulum swinging back and maybe a hint of purple working

722
00:38:56.119 --> 00:38:59.840
<v Speaker 5>toward blue. Maybe Colin already has a chance and throw

723
00:38:59.840 --> 00:39:02.480
<v Speaker 5>it redistricting, which we do at a whole week there

724
00:39:02.519 --> 00:39:05.320
<v Speaker 5>may not simply be you know, Martin Beezy and Julie

725
00:39:05.360 --> 00:39:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Johnson may not be around anymore. But let's just say

726
00:39:09.840 --> 00:39:13.000
<v Speaker 5>that it's trending well for Texas as a red state.

727
00:39:13.760 --> 00:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And you want to talk about a war chest, I mean,

728
00:39:15.519 --> 00:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor Abbot just was it twenty million dollars in a

729
00:39:18.920 --> 00:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>week and eighty six million dollars total?

730
00:39:21.039 --> 00:39:22.599
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, And that's I mean, that's a big part

731
00:39:22.639 --> 00:39:25.599
<v Speaker 4>of the conversation with twenty twenty six too, just thinking

732
00:39:25.639 --> 00:39:30.360
<v Speaker 4>about back to twenty eighteen when you know, as we

733
00:39:30.360 --> 00:39:33.159
<v Speaker 4>were discussing, things got really close, but we had Governor

734
00:39:33.159 --> 00:39:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Abbott kind of lifting all boats on the Republican side.

735
00:39:36.519 --> 00:39:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Further down the ballot with his blowout when that same year,

736
00:39:41.960 --> 00:39:44.000
<v Speaker 4>and you know, to your point, Mark, I think with

737
00:39:44.679 --> 00:39:48.159
<v Speaker 4>Abbot sort of reading the conservative tea leaves and you know,

738
00:39:48.239 --> 00:39:50.280
<v Speaker 4>shoring up his right flank. I mean you just look

739
00:39:50.320 --> 00:39:53.360
<v Speaker 4>at the agenda that he's rolled out for this special session.

740
00:39:53.400 --> 00:39:56.639
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's kind of a grab bag of anything

741
00:39:56.679 --> 00:40:00.000
<v Speaker 4>you could you could want that hasn't yet been accomplished.

742
00:40:00.159 --> 00:40:03.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think he's a pretty bulletproof heading into March.

743
00:40:03.639 --> 00:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Ran if he's got all that money and no primary challenger,

744
00:40:06.639 --> 00:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot to a lot of wealth to spread.

745
00:40:08.480 --> 00:40:10.599
<v Speaker 5>Around an enviable place to be.

746
00:40:10.920 --> 00:40:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

747
00:40:11.440 --> 00:40:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Our colleague alle Hundro Serrana, when we saw that number,

748
00:40:15.159 --> 00:40:18.159
<v Speaker 1>said imagine what the Texas Tribune could do with that money?

749
00:40:18.440 --> 00:40:22.039
<v Speaker 3>And I said, are you proposingly Rob craig donation?

750
00:40:22.559 --> 00:40:24.079
<v Speaker 5>Time for that donation, bitch.

751
00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes exactly.

752
00:40:25.280 --> 00:40:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Dave Carney's jumping jumping to send that over

753
00:40:28.440 --> 00:40:29.239
<v Speaker 2>to us. Yeah, exactly.

754
00:40:29.280 --> 00:40:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we're top of the list for right now.

755
00:40:31.920 --> 00:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, you know we will have to leave it there,

756
00:40:34.960 --> 00:40:37.079
<v Speaker 1>but thank you so much for joining us, Mark, this

757
00:40:37.159 --> 00:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>was a fantastic conversation. Yeah, before we head out, we

758
00:40:41.760 --> 00:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>will just say thank you to this week's sponsor, members

759
00:40:44.400 --> 00:40:47.079
<v Speaker 1>of the Texas Tribune, which could be any of you

760
00:40:47.119 --> 00:40:50.519
<v Speaker 1>who are listening. Become a member of the Texas Tribune

761
00:40:50.519 --> 00:40:55.199
<v Speaker 1>today at Texas Tribune dot org slash donate. That is

762
00:40:55.239 --> 00:40:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode of the Trip Cast, Jasper, Thank you

763
00:40:57.800 --> 00:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for joining us.

764
00:40:58.639 --> 00:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

765
00:40:59.199 --> 00:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Our producers are are Chris and Rob. You can get

766
00:41:01.920 --> 00:41:05.599
<v Speaker 1>this podcast anywhere you get podcasts or on YouTube dot

767
00:41:05.639 --> 00:41:19.079
<v Speaker 1>com and we'll see you next week.
