Speaker 1: Beny like you just let me in my way.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, go to Blazes listeners, and today I'm flying solo.
Speaker 2: No guests today we will have guests, though we will
Speaker 2: continue to have guests. I hope you're enjoying our guest episodes.
Speaker 2: I like having subject matter experts and just talking to
Speaker 2: people who go out of their way to either make
Speaker 2: a difference in the world or bring light to a
Speaker 2: situation that well we very well may have not been
Speaker 2: aware of. And I like talking to these people because
Speaker 2: I believe that you the listener also like listening and
Speaker 2: hearing from these people. Listening to and hearing from well,
Speaker 2: sometimes I don't put all the words together, but I
Speaker 2: think point made right Before I move forward, I do
Speaker 2: want to remind everybody, and I think those who have
Speaker 2: done so already, but you use to support the show,
Speaker 2: which many of you do, which I really do appreciate.
Speaker 2: Please go to www dot world ablazepodcast dot com. Visit
Speaker 2: the website. You will see social media links, you'll see
Speaker 2: all of our episodes. I even have a page dedicated
Speaker 2: to our guests that have been a part of the
Speaker 2: show where you can view a little bit more about them.
Speaker 2: There's links to their information and if you choose to,
Speaker 2: and I hope you do, and I appreciate when you do.
Speaker 2: To support the show monetarily, there is a link there
Speaker 2: that you can click. You can go to buy me
Speaker 2: a coffee from my web page, which is world Blaze
Speaker 2: podcast dot com, and you could donate to help the show,
Speaker 2: help us continue to do what we do. With that
Speaker 2: being said, I also want to address something since we've
Speaker 2: moved our hosts. We stepped away from Sprecker for various
Speaker 2: reasons and we are now hosted on RSS, and I've
Speaker 2: chosen to not insert the advertisements lately, just because I
Speaker 2: felt it was a taken away from the show quite
Speaker 2: a bit, especially with the type of content that we present.
Speaker 2: And I'm not saying we will never have advertisements again.
Speaker 2: Believe me, it will come at some point, but right now,
Speaker 2: I just want to focus on the content and I
Speaker 2: want as little interruptions as possible, which means that if
Speaker 2: you do hear any advertisements in the future or sponsors,
Speaker 2: what have you, it'll be worth our time, which will
Speaker 2: also equal less interruptions, which means you don't have to
Speaker 2: hear as many advertisements. But again, for now, I am
Speaker 2: going down the road of for the moment, no advertisements,
Speaker 2: but again they will return at some point, I'm sure.
Speaker 2: I also want to thank many of our listeners. Look,
Speaker 2: I want to address a few things. We've seen a
Speaker 2: crazy uptick and downloads from other nations in the world.
Speaker 2: But before I move forward to recognizing those nations, I
Speaker 2: want to really really make sure that Iceland knows that
Speaker 2: I appreciate them. When I first started this, one of
Speaker 2: the first countries, the first international countries, first countries in
Speaker 2: the world that supported this show was Iceland. I was amazed.
Speaker 2: I was like, wow, I got downloads out of Iceland,
Speaker 2: of all places, and they continue to do so. In fact,
Speaker 2: I've seen multiple downloads. Now I have trackers and software
Speaker 2: and different things that we pay for that I could
Speaker 2: literally see a map of the world. I have a
Speaker 2: heat map that'll actually show me where your downloads are
Speaker 2: coming from, so I know exactly what cities these are
Speaker 2: all coming from, a general idea of the locations where
Speaker 2: these things are being downloaded. Now I don't have your address,
Speaker 2: and no I'm not going to stalk you, but just
Speaker 2: saying I can see I can see the info. I
Speaker 2: can see that there's activity there's activity in and around
Speaker 2: certain areas. So I just want to appreciate Iceland by
Speaker 2: thinking Iceland for continuing to support us and recently I
Speaker 2: also want to absolutely think Australia and New Zealand. In fact,
Speaker 2: New Zealand and Australia are now in our top ten
Speaker 2: countries in which all of our downloads are coming from.
Speaker 2: Number one is the United States, two is United Kingdom,
Speaker 2: number three Canada, number four in our top ten Australia,
Speaker 2: number five is Germany, number six is Sweden. Seven there
Speaker 2: is New Zealand, number eight, Ireland, number nine Mexico, and
Speaker 2: tenth on the top ten list is France. But making
Speaker 2: one of the number one cities by downloads is Australia
Speaker 2: and that is Sydney. And in the number five slot
Speaker 2: of the top ten cities is Melbourne. So we got
Speaker 2: two large cities out of Australia that made our top ten.
Speaker 2: Thank you Australia and again special thanks to New Zealand.
Speaker 2: And appreciate everything that you guys are doing out there
Speaker 2: and supporting the show, spreading the word, and if you
Speaker 2: haven't please share this show with others. And if you
Speaker 2: haven't done this either, clicked the damn notification button. Look,
Speaker 2: if you're already subscribing or following the show, you've got
Speaker 2: to click the notification so you know when new episodes
Speaker 2: are coming out now before you'll run out and do that.
Speaker 2: And I half admit I skipped a week roughly, just
Speaker 2: because we've been going through a few things. My other
Speaker 2: businesses needed attention. One of my warehouses was recently broken
Speaker 2: into and robbed to the tune of I think nearly
Speaker 2: thirty grand. So far haven't counted out all the or
Speaker 2: even acknowledged or found how much stuff has been missing,
Speaker 2: but so far we found around thirty thousand or so.
Speaker 2: I don't need your sympathy. I'm not. I'm not trying
Speaker 2: to get you to feel sorry for me, just letting
Speaker 2: you know, Hey, other things have been going on that
Speaker 2: demanded my attention. But that being said, this episode's long overdue.
Speaker 2: And yes, I will be addressing the signal messaging debacle
Speaker 2: that involves Mike Waltz and Pete Hexseth, which I'll definitely
Speaker 2: get to, but first I have I don't know if
Speaker 2: I have a bone to pick with this person or
Speaker 2: kind of disappointed, but listen, I don't usually call out
Speaker 2: other podcasters or media personalities really often. I mean I do,
Speaker 2: but at least not really often on this show. I
Speaker 2: kind of save those antics and shenanigans for my other
Speaker 2: show I do with my brother Random Thoughts with Manuel George,
Speaker 2: and that's where we get a little bit more loose,
Speaker 2: you know, kind of just talk shit, let things happen there.
Speaker 2: But I was listening to Michael Knowles, and I can
Speaker 2: good admit this to everybody listen. I do check in
Speaker 2: with some of these guys in terms of listening see
Speaker 2: see what's going on in their heads, get a little
Speaker 2: little idea for the pulse of things. But I'm not
Speaker 2: an avid listener. I'm not someone who goes out of
Speaker 2: the way to listen to somebody like Michael Knowles or
Speaker 2: Ben Shapiro or whatever flavor of the day of the
Speaker 2: bastion of Conservatism is because I just honestly don't agree
Speaker 2: with everything they say, and many times, or more often
Speaker 2: than not, I find it to be quite mundane, monotonous,
Speaker 2: and boring, to be honest, when it becomes of my Michael Knowles,
Speaker 2: it's it's really he seems more like he's more of
Speaker 2: a bishop of the Catholic Church than anything else lately.
Speaker 2: And again, he's an he's He's not someone that I'm
Speaker 2: here to to down. I am. I am bringing this
Speaker 2: up because I'm just slightly disappointed, slightly disappointed, And I'm
Speaker 2: not attacking his belief in Catholicism either, It's just, you know,
Speaker 2: just the way he comes across. He's a highly intelligent person.
Speaker 2: You can't argue he isn't. He's he's well read. But
Speaker 2: his recent one of his recent episodes, he does put
Speaker 2: them out quite often, but one of his recent episodes
Speaker 2: I listened to where he was addressing Andrew Tait. He's
Speaker 2: brought him up before, but in this particular episode, I
Speaker 2: felt I felt like or it came across as if
Speaker 2: he was kind of defending him in a way for
Speaker 2: being a slave to his own sin, for not being
Speaker 2: able to help himself, because it's just his character and
Speaker 2: who he is. And I'm sorry, but that's wrong. I
Speaker 2: got to call that one out because Andrew Tat is
Speaker 2: someone that I've talked about before. My brother has shooting.
Speaker 2: Almost everybody I know has at some point. He's Look,
Speaker 2: he's a public figure. No matter how you want to
Speaker 2: slice this, slice this up and try to digest it
Speaker 2: and take it in. He's a public figure. He says
Speaker 2: stupid shit publicly. He's just somebody who is in the limelight,
Speaker 2: as they say, and so if someone has an opinion
Speaker 2: about what he says or does, well then that's just
Speaker 2: what it is. Everybody has an opinion because he's not
Speaker 2: hiding who he is. And he may try to say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, it's all entertainment and fun, but is it?
Speaker 2: Is it really there? Andrew? And before I dive into
Speaker 2: a little bit about what Michael says, because I'm actually
Speaker 2: gona play clips from that episode and you'll be the judge.
Speaker 2: And if I'm wrong, if I took this wrong, then
Speaker 2: correct me. And if Michael gets wind of this, good
Speaker 2: I really don't care, because I'm sure he's an amazing
Speaker 2: wordsmith with a large vocabulary and probably could debate me
Speaker 2: all day until I get tired and just say, fine whatever,
Speaker 2: throw my hands up. But I'm not here to talk
Speaker 2: about Catholicism. I'm talking about the fact, at least the
Speaker 2: fact as I see it, and what you said and
Speaker 2: what you said about Andrew Tate. And again, Michael, if
Speaker 2: I misinterpreted, fine on me. But I'm still going to
Speaker 2: address it. I still am going to address it, but
Speaker 2: before I do so, I want you to hear a
Speaker 2: little bit about Andrew Tate, because Andrew's going out recently
Speaker 2: and just slapping lawsuits on everybody on social media who
Speaker 2: has an opinion or says something about him, for you know,
Speaker 2: the defamation, but defamation based on opinions that people have
Speaker 2: made or come to make based on things that he
Speaker 2: has actually done. And the argument Andrew always has is that, well,
Speaker 2: it hasn't been proven in a quarter long there's no
Speaker 2: there's no evidence against me. Well, yes there is, Andrew,
Speaker 2: there is evidence. It's all over the Internet. It's everywhere.
Speaker 2: It's from YouTube to I mean anywhere there's a video
Speaker 2: format available, it's on x it's everywhere everywhere. You haven't
Speaker 2: been banned anyway, and so you do have a body
Speaker 2: of evidence, a body of work which people can judge
Speaker 2: you by. And but you know, nonetheless, he's he's slapping
Speaker 2: a lawsuit on everybody he can to try to get
Speaker 2: them to shut up because he doesn't want to hear
Speaker 2: the noise basically, and he's realizing there's nowhere else for
Speaker 2: him to run and shut people out there. Look, they're
Speaker 2: over it. They're over it. But here's here's here's a clip.
Speaker 2: It's a compilation. It's kind of long. I mean not
Speaker 2: play the whole thing. I may chop it up a
Speaker 2: bit just so you don't have to sit through four
Speaker 2: or five minutes of this. But here's Andrew in his
Speaker 2: own words throughout the that teaches.
Speaker 3: Basically how I got girls, how I met girls, how
Speaker 3: I got girls to like me, How I got girls
Speaker 3: to fall in love with me, to work on webcam
Speaker 3: for me, because that's what I did. Was my mo
Speaker 3: O was fine girls, make them love me and make
Speaker 3: them work for me, and that's how I got rich.
Speaker 3: So that teaches everything I know from start to finish
Speaker 3: about not only getting girls, not only obtaining them, but
Speaker 3: retaining them.
Speaker 4: I used sex as a tool to make women love
Speaker 4: me so they'd obey me and live in my house
Speaker 4: and make me money.
Speaker 5: That's what I wanted.
Speaker 4: So I was a pimp in that sense, Like I
Speaker 4: was not trying to have sex with women. I was
Speaker 4: trying to get women to obey me. And I realized
Speaker 4: that's easier if they like to.
Speaker 5: Have sex with me. Because they don't like having sex.
Speaker 4: With me, it's pretty hard to make them listen to me.
Speaker 6: I don't mention webcam until after I've had sex with
Speaker 6: the girl. You your boughtom bitch, the new girl you
Speaker 6: go out for fucking a nice dinner. Your bottom bitch
Speaker 6: is the one who does the selling. You don't do
Speaker 6: the selling. The girl has to hear from a girl,
Speaker 6: and this is where your boughtom bitch has to be trained.
Speaker 6: So I said, it's so important to have a good
Speaker 6: first girl.
Speaker 2: Far Andrew sounds like a winner, right. He doesn't sound
Speaker 2: like anybody who would ever do anything wrong. He just,
Speaker 2: you know, this just is who he is. It doesn't
Speaker 2: mean he's actually carrying any of these actions out or
Speaker 2: his beliefs out, and he's just maybe entertaining. He's doing
Speaker 2: what he has to do to retain and maintain his followers.
Speaker 2: Possibly maybe, But these are things that he has said
Speaker 2: throughout the years repeatedly and hasn't changed. Cadence hasn't really
Speaker 2: changed his view. But here's more.
Speaker 5: But he didn't teach you in self defense.
Speaker 7: Here's a little move when I grab you by your
Speaker 7: neck and you start annoying me, trying to resist, and
Speaker 7: I just pull and then I grab you by your
Speaker 7: neck again. Then what the fuck you know doing?
Speaker 3: Your face has collapsed and your fucking cheap bones broken.
Speaker 5: You're gonna do shit but cry.
Speaker 3: I guarantee I changed the way you look at sex forever.
Speaker 5: You're gonna be fucking crying. I won't cry.
Speaker 4: I bet you cry, bitch, I bet you fucking cry.
Speaker 5: You're saying I wouldn't cry. You're challenging me to a fight.
Speaker 5: You're saying I can't hurt you. You're got your fucking mind.
Speaker 5: I didn't even have to fuck you forgetting a sex part.
Speaker 5: That's a distraction. My dack can stay on my past.
Speaker 5: I'll just start beating the shy.
Speaker 2: So I mean, is it still performances? He's right here
Speaker 2: again on another video that was recorded that he actually
Speaker 2: really sends on social media platforms, where he's talking about,
Speaker 2: you know, sex with doesn't matter. I'll just beat you.
Speaker 2: I'll just beat a woman in submission so that well,
Speaker 2: they'll do what I tell them because it's all about
Speaker 2: making that money. Right. Okay, here's a little bit more.
Speaker 2: If you don't believe me, here's his view on why
Speaker 2: he would even pursue a woman.
Speaker 5: I have tours, she obeys me.
Speaker 7: I don't give a it about having some beautiful women,
Speaker 7: so they listen to me so I can get what
Speaker 7: I actually want, which is not them to means to
Speaker 7: an end.
Speaker 5: Every single Bond girl was exploited.
Speaker 7: That's exactly what I do when I want your Bond
Speaker 7: film and I see him basically pimp a bitch to me.
Speaker 5: That speaks to my heart. I've been there, I've.
Speaker 7: Done that, and you wone who's followed me long enough
Speaker 7: knows that I first made my billion dollars through the
Speaker 7: webcam business. I have met beautiful women with a good personality,
Speaker 7: and dollshit will make me money.
Speaker 5: I have to. I don't want to strive to need
Speaker 5: the money.
Speaker 2: Now, this clip is interesting because Andrew's always, or at
Speaker 2: least lately, has denied how he made his money. Oh,
Speaker 2: webcam business, that was just talk. I never really did
Speaker 2: any of that. But in this clip he admits to
Speaker 2: making his first million through a webcam business, even says
Speaker 2: that if anybody has ever followed me, you would know this.
Speaker 2: You know this is what I did, This is how
Speaker 2: I made my money, this is what I do. Yet
Speaker 2: we still have somehow conservative media personalities podcasters who defend
Speaker 2: this guy who give this guy oxygen, so to speak,
Speaker 2: in continuing to talk and host him, and they claim, well, hey,
Speaker 2: I have a right to talk to whoever I want,
Speaker 2: just like anybody else. But none of them ever pushed
Speaker 2: back on Andrew. None of them hold him to task,
Speaker 2: nobody holds him accountable for anything because they're all afraid
Speaker 2: of getting sued. They're afraid of Andrew just throwing a
Speaker 2: lawsuit at him. But why would you have him on
Speaker 2: a show if you're not going to challenge the controversy
Speaker 2: in which he surrounds himself. Why would you not challenge
Speaker 2: his statements that he's ever made instead of patting him
Speaker 2: on the back and acting like he's a leader of
Speaker 2: the free world, like he is somebody that that all
Speaker 2: young men should look up to and aspire to be,
Speaker 2: when he absolutely isn't. Hell, he even just came to
Speaker 2: America finally they let him come here. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: the complete details of why or how he was allowed
Speaker 2: or whatever, but he left Romania, came to the United
Speaker 2: States and immediately went on a podcast tour. He had
Speaker 2: He's had his opportunity on Patrick Bett David, which I
Speaker 2: am very surprised that he even hosted Andrew Tait and
Speaker 2: during that entire episode didn't even challenge andw taint and anything.
Speaker 2: You just kind of let them run his mouth and
Speaker 2: they just all nodded their head as in agreeance, which
Speaker 2: I think is horrible. You have canas Owen's who's who's
Speaker 2: always supported him for whatever reason, saying, oh, he's just
Speaker 2: a victim of circumstance. He didn't really do anything. They're
Speaker 2: targeting Andrew because he's just Andrew. Well, that's bullshit, that's bullshit.
Speaker 2: The evidence is out there, the evidence and how he
Speaker 2: carries himself, the things he says now that may not
Speaker 2: be physical evidence, but there are reports. There has been
Speaker 2: many people who've come forward that have spoken against Andrew.
Speaker 2: And this is this is even before he is I
Speaker 2: mean as famous as he is now. I mean he's
Speaker 2: always been in the limelight, but he's let's just be honest,
Speaker 2: he's probably more famous today than he's ever been. And
Speaker 2: people have come out in fact, he couldn't even hold back.
Speaker 2: Apparently one of his ex girlfriends while he was in
Speaker 2: the US made a claim I'll just say alleged, but
Speaker 2: Andrew Tate, his girlfriend Breestern is suing him for sexual assault.
Speaker 2: According to her, he choked her during sex, he got
Speaker 2: out of control, went too far, things that Tate always
Speaker 2: says he doesn't do. How many people need to come
Speaker 2: forward before we actually hold him accountable. Why do we
Speaker 2: even entertain this guy? Sure, it's a free world. Sure
Speaker 2: Tate has not been convicted in a court of law,
Speaker 2: whether abroad or in the United States. But State of
Speaker 2: Florida is investigating him now. The United Kingdom wants to
Speaker 2: get their hands on him for things that he has
Speaker 2: allegedly done in the United Kingdom and Romania where he
Speaker 2: just went back. He went back to face the music
Speaker 2: as he still stands firm in the fact that he
Speaker 2: is somehow innocent. Maybe he is innocent, maybe he is
Speaker 2: is yet to be determined. And if he is innocent, great,
Speaker 2: then he's innocent. But he needs needs to denounce everything
Speaker 2: that he said and how he built his wealth, because
Speaker 2: the messaging is either way not good, not good for anybody,
Speaker 2: especially when you have young men who look up to him,
Speaker 2: boys look up to him. This is not the way
Speaker 2: to carry yourself, Andrew. But again, let's get back to
Speaker 2: Michael Knowles. I did all that just so you get
Speaker 2: an idea of this person. So Michael Knowles recently, I'm
Speaker 2: not saying he's behind Andrew Tay one hundred percent, but again,
Speaker 2: someone who has built their career on being a conservative
Speaker 2: with very very stern roots in Christianity, who claims to
Speaker 2: live their life by all principles of Catholicism, and Michael
Speaker 2: very well may I don't know him personally. I really don't. Again,
Speaker 2: I don't listen to the man every day. I check
Speaker 2: in once in a while. I probably do what many
Speaker 2: of you do. I bounce around and hear this person
Speaker 2: that person here and there. But you know, I'm too
Speaker 2: busy in my own life to give too many of
Speaker 2: these guys my attention. And I have my own show
Speaker 2: to worry about. So that being said, I'm gonna play
Speaker 2: a little bit of what Michael Knowles says about Andrew Tate,
Speaker 2: and I encourage you to listen to his entire episode
Speaker 2: so that you can come to your own conclusion. I
Speaker 2: think it was episode one thousand, seven hundred and three
Speaker 2: if you want to look that up, labeled my day
Speaker 2: at the White House with four Cabinet Members. And once
Speaker 2: you get past listening to his pontification and how amazing
Speaker 2: he is and how he is one of the many
Speaker 2: few of the new media personalities to be invited the
Speaker 2: White House. He does go on to discuss Andrew Tate
Speaker 2: a bit, and I'm just going to play a little
Speaker 2: bit of the clip from where he is, in my view,
Speaker 2: kind of defending his actions because he's just a victim
Speaker 2: of his own addiction.
Speaker 1: This defense of that is when a video came out
Speaker 1: of him hitting a woman and threatening a woman and
Speaker 1: saying all the things that have come out in these
Speaker 1: text messages, he says, Oh, we're just playing around. That's
Speaker 1: our kink, basically, and I kind of believe him on this.
Speaker 1: He clearly it's one thing for a man to hit
Speaker 1: a woman, that's horrific enough. But for a man to
Speaker 1: text about how excited he is to hit a woman
Speaker 1: and you know, wait for the response back, that's clearly
Speaker 1: a deeper kind of pathology. So that's why I'm speaking
Speaker 1: about it, because I don't think anyone, including Andrew Tate,
Speaker 1: would dispute the basic allegations of this case, or this
Speaker 1: allegation or this claim that's just come out recently within
Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks. The question is is it
Speaker 1: is it good or bad?
Speaker 2: Hold on. So is that the question, Michael, not not
Speaker 2: the action, but whether it was a good or bad
Speaker 2: action based on whether or not it was a kink
Speaker 2: of his whether he just has a sexual preference for
Speaker 2: choking and beating women. All right, let's continue this.
Speaker 1: All in good fun? Or was this abuse? And I
Speaker 1: guess my question is what's the difference. I've made this
Speaker 1: point before. When people are really ironic all the time,
Speaker 1: they're really ironic. Millennials are guilty of an extreme degree
Speaker 1: of irony, and I think, well, if you're ironic all
Speaker 1: the time, then I think you're just kind of earnest.
Speaker 2: Okay, So is it okay because it's ironic. I'm trying
Speaker 2: to understand here. I'm trying to understand, Michael, what exactly
Speaker 2: is your point? See maybe I misunderstood you, ma'am taking
Speaker 2: this wrong, But so far, I'm not quite sure the
Speaker 2: point you're trying to make. And if you don't really
Speaker 2: have a good point to make about Andrew Tate in
Speaker 2: terms of whether or not this is good or bad,
Speaker 2: then why speak at all other than to get downloads
Speaker 2: and clicks and whatever, because he's such a controversial character.
Speaker 2: But let's continue. Let's continue Michael Knowles's opinion, if.
Speaker 1: You do something ironically all the time, then that's just
Speaker 1: what you're doing, and that's just who you are.
Speaker 5: And the story about Tate.
Speaker 1: It gets to a much deeper political and spiritual problem,
Speaker 1: which is he appears to be a slave to his
Speaker 1: own passions. If this stuff is true, if the things
Speaker 1: he's said in public are true, that he really gets
Speaker 1: off on hitting women and feeling that he owns them
Speaker 1: and branding them, putting his name and tattoos on their bodies,
Speaker 1: If all these things are true, they obviously appear to
Speaker 1: be true, then he's got a problem. He's a slave
Speaker 1: to his own disordered appetites and passions.
Speaker 2: Oh I see. So, even if it's true and could
Speaker 2: be construed as wrong, he's just a slave to his
Speaker 2: own appetites and desires. He's just a victim of his
Speaker 2: own addiction. So therefore, what we should be sympathetic, we
Speaker 2: should be more understanding, Like, what's the point we're making here, Michael,
Speaker 2: I'm disappointed here. I mean, listen, you can listen to
Speaker 2: the whole episode. You can listen to that whole section
Speaker 2: which starts at about thirty two minutes, and it's in
Speaker 2: so you can come to your own conclusion, because I'm
Speaker 2: not here to beat up Michael Knowles here on a podcast,
Speaker 2: by the way, he's not in front of me, so
Speaker 2: we can't debate this. I'm not on his show, he's
Speaker 2: not on mine. We probably never will be on each
Speaker 2: other shows, which doesn't hurt my feelings whatsoever. But the
Speaker 2: reality is there is an alarming, an alarming pattern of
Speaker 2: conservatives kind of jumping to the defensive tape, and well,
Speaker 2: Michael's not outright saying, look, his actions are absolutely fine,
Speaker 2: because they're all just allegations. No, Michael does go on
Speaker 2: to say, look, there's been a history here, A lot
Speaker 2: of it may be true. It could very well be true.
Speaker 2: It might even seem to be true based on his
Speaker 2: patterns and his history, based on reports and you know,
Speaker 2: tweets and everything else that he's done. But goes on
Speaker 2: to justify what he's doing because hey, guy just says
Speaker 2: an addiction problem. It's all just a kink. He gets
Speaker 2: off on beating women because it gives them sexual gratification,
Speaker 2: because it allows him to feel like a bigger person,
Speaker 2: because he can control another and make them bend to
Speaker 2: his will so that he can make money off of
Speaker 2: their sexual abuse. All right, Well, maybe I'm off, maybe
Speaker 2: I'm wrong in that interpretation, but Michael, we expect better
Speaker 2: of you, especially since, let's just be honest, you know,
Speaker 2: since Dan Bongino pretty much hung it up and he's
Speaker 2: now Deputy to Record of FBI, everybody's turning to other podcasters,
Speaker 2: at least in the conservative side, for who's the next guy,
Speaker 2: who's the next leader, And so far, Michael's name has
Speaker 2: been coming up more and more, and Michael Knowles has
Speaker 2: become even more popular than he has been just because
Speaker 2: of the void that was left by mister Bongino. Whether
Speaker 2: you're like Dan or not, it's not really the question here.
Speaker 2: It's just a matter of fact that Michael Knowles kind
Speaker 2: of stepping into that void. And if that's the position
Speaker 2: that you want to be in, Michael, and you want
Speaker 2: to be the bastion of truth and light and Christian
Speaker 2: morality and lessons, and you know, that's how you want
Speaker 2: to project yourself and claim how other should live their life.
Speaker 2: We can't be justifying people's actions, words, even messages, whatever
Speaker 2: it is, that are based in abuse and hatred and manipulation,
Speaker 2: because they just can't help themselves. Now, Michael does go
Speaker 2: on to use some biblical references and continues to say,
Speaker 2: how you know the weight of sin is a yoke
Speaker 2: upon you and etc. Etc. And he does say, hey,
Speaker 2: maybe don't do that thing that Andrew Tate does. Right,
Speaker 2: So he's not coming to his full defense, but I
Speaker 2: do feel like there's a bit of justification, like, oh,
Speaker 2: poor Andrew, poor guy. He can't help himself. He's just addicted,
Speaker 2: and if he just comes to God, all will be
Speaker 2: forgiven and all will be right. And according to the
Speaker 2: Christian faith, sure, sure, just come to God, everything's good forgiven.
Speaker 2: But will humanity forgive him? I mean, I'm not here
Speaker 2: again to any spiritual moral arguments as far as the
Speaker 2: principles of Christianity you're concerned, But the reality is actions
Speaker 2: and deeds have been done and this guy needs to
Speaker 2: be called out on it. I mean, sorry, but let's
Speaker 2: just stop supporting Andrew Tate. Let's just stop giving him
Speaker 2: the platform to try to win hearts and minds over.
Speaker 2: Or maybe we should give the platform just let him
Speaker 2: talk and let him continue to expose himself. I don't
Speaker 2: know either way. Michael, I expected more of you. I
Speaker 2: expected that you would have been a little bit more
Speaker 2: harsh or stern upon someone such as Anderwtaate who's in
Speaker 2: complete contradiction contrast to what you completely believe in and
Speaker 2: how you choose to live your life. But hey, Michael, again,
Speaker 2: not here to beat you up. Just had to call
Speaker 2: you out on this one, and it continued to do
Speaker 2: the good work. I mean, listen, your show is doing great,
Speaker 2: and I'm sure you don't care what I have to say.
Speaker 2: But I'm also not going to be one of those
Speaker 2: people who just towes a line, sits down, and doesn't
Speaker 2: call people out on their shit because well it needs
Speaker 2: to be done anyway. Good luck to you, Michael, and
Speaker 2: on your continued endeavors. Now let's move on to matters
Speaker 2: of national security leaked messages, people who are included in
Speaker 2: sensitive chats and conversations that shouldn't be included. And of
Speaker 2: course I'm sure you figured out that I'm talking about
Speaker 2: the Signal chat debacle that included Pete Hegseth, Mike Waltz,
Speaker 2: and a reporter from the Atlantic somehow. Well, so what
Speaker 2: is signal Well, Signal is an end to end encrypted
Speaker 2: application that has approved for communication, actually has been approved
Speaker 2: to be used by departments in the government. It's an
Speaker 2: application that has been used by our military. In fact,
Speaker 2: many different organizations in militaries throughout the world from different
Speaker 2: countries obviously territories, et cetera. And the reason that it
Speaker 2: is used is because it's considered to be one of
Speaker 2: the more secured apps outdoor applications. I can tell you
Speaker 2: for a fact that, well, I have people who serve
Speaker 2: in the military that I know personally, and the conversation
Speaker 2: of this chat app signal has come up before.
Speaker 6: I know.
Speaker 2: The Marines use it. And while people question how and
Speaker 2: why that Jeffrey Goldberg from the Atlantic was added in
Speaker 2: this chat, it does happen. I've been told by various
Speaker 2: individuals who served in the Army and Marines and the
Speaker 2: branches that they would somehow be included in chats in
Speaker 2: signal that they don't feel they should have been included in.
Speaker 2: There would be newly enlisted people grouped in with officers
Speaker 2: who are communicating and talking about various different things, and
Speaker 2: now they may not all be necessarily sensitive secret information,
Speaker 2: but definitely is an example of where not all individuals
Speaker 2: should be in the conversation, but somehow have been inadvertently added.
Speaker 2: So is Signal something that government officials truly do use?
Speaker 5: Yes?
Speaker 2: Absolutely. In fact, here is our Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 2: Tulsa Gabbard speaking of this herself.
Speaker 8: The Signal message app comes pre installed on government devices.
Speaker 8: In December of twenty twenty four, CISUS stated quote, we
Speaker 8: strongly urge highly targeted individuals to immediately review and apply
Speaker 8: best practices provided in the Guidance to Protect Mobile communications,
Speaker 8: including consistent use end to end encryption, and they name
Speaker 8: Signal as an app as an example of such an
Speaker 8: end to end encrypted messaging app. Ideally, these conversations occur
Speaker 8: in person. However, at times, fast moving coordination of an
Speaker 8: unclassified nature is necessary where in person conversation is not
Speaker 8: an option.
Speaker 2: So there you have it. Tolsi goes on to say
Speaker 2: that these these apps, or this app in particular, this
Speaker 2: Signal messaging app is pre installed in government devices is
Speaker 2: a recommended app to be used for when you can't
Speaker 2: have those face to face conversations. But she does go
Speaker 2: on to say that we need better guidance when it
Speaker 2: comes to highly targeted sensitive individuals when it comes to messaging,
Speaker 2: and you know when it comes to using this app
Speaker 2: in particular, so there is kind of an admission that, yeah,
Speaker 2: we can use this, but it's not recommended it it
Speaker 2: could be a problem, and in this case, recently it
Speaker 2: has become a problem. Pete Hegseth has gone on to
Speaker 2: defend himself because why wouldn't he try to defend himself.
Speaker 2: He feels that he himself didn't do anything wrong. So
Speaker 2: the question has come up, you know, how did this journalist,
Speaker 2: this editor of the Atlantic Journal or The Atlantic, how
Speaker 2: did they get invited or how did Jeffrey Goldberg get
Speaker 2: invited to the conversation? How is he added? So it
Speaker 2: goes on to say, well, it was Mike Waltz, national
Speaker 2: security advisor, Mike Wallas who did it. And then Mike
Speaker 2: Waltz goes on to point fingers and go, it wasn't me,
Speaker 2: it was one of my staffers. So heg Seth is
Speaker 2: pointing at Waltz, Waltz is pointing at his staffer, and
Speaker 2: nobody wants to take responsibility, which is ridiculous. I just
Speaker 2: can't understand how when you're at this level that you
Speaker 2: can come to the conclusion that you could just pass
Speaker 2: the buck and not take responsibility, especially when it comes
Speaker 2: to Pete Hegseth. You are the Secretary of Defense for
Speaker 2: the United States of America, one of the most powerful nations,
Speaker 2: if not the most powerful nation in the world, with
Speaker 2: one of the or really the most powerful military in
Speaker 2: the world. You can't just pass the buck here. You're
Speaker 2: the CEO, my friend, You're the one the buck stops
Speaker 2: with you. You have to take responsibility. But instead he goes
Speaker 2: on to blame the Shenanigans again, not on his staff
Speaker 2: or anybody else, which he really should, and he should
Speaker 2: just blame it on himself and take responsibility. He goes
Speaker 2: on to try to discredit said editor reporter of The Atlantic,
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Goldberg, by saying, this guy pedals in garbage. He's
Speaker 2: nothing bored than a misinformation hack. Here's that clip.
Speaker 9: Do share how your information about war plans against the
Speaker 9: Heaths and Yemen was shared with a journalist and Atlantic
Speaker 9: and where those details classified.
Speaker 10: So you're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so
Speaker 10: called journalists who's made a profession of pedaling hoaxes time
Speaker 10: and time again, to include the I don't know the
Speaker 10: hoaxes of Russia, Russia Russia or the fine people on
Speaker 10: both sides, hoax or suckers and losers hopes. So this
Speaker 10: is the guy that pedals in garbage.
Speaker 2: Wow, Pete, not the response we expect from the Secretary
Speaker 2: of Defense of the United States. What's the proper response here? Well, Pete,
Speaker 2: I would say, maybe we have no words. We apologize
Speaker 2: for this leak or alleged leak. We have no idea
Speaker 2: how this happened. We're going to look into this and
Speaker 2: make sure this never happens again. We take our national
Speaker 2: security and security of our military that are out in
Speaker 2: the field conducting operations seriously, and we will do everything
Speaker 2: in our power to make sure that these secrets and
Speaker 2: these communications never see the light of day outside of
Speaker 2: anyone who is authorized to do so. That's it. Something
Speaker 2: similar to that. I mean, I know it's not perfect,
Speaker 2: and write it out and polishit. That was on the
Speaker 2: fly here, just off the top of my head. And
Speaker 2: if I can do that, I'm very sure that Pete hegsit,
Speaker 2: is more than capable of making an even better response.
Speaker 2: That is acceptable, and he needs to apologize. He needs
Speaker 2: to apologize. The other thing he needs to do is
Speaker 2: just shut the fuck up. Listen, Pete, you fucked up
Speaker 2: your department fucked up. There's no other defense other than
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, we fucked up. We're not going to do
Speaker 2: it again. We're going to make sure that we make
Speaker 2: sure that this never happens again. Period. Now we can
Speaker 2: argue whether or not this was top secret information that
Speaker 2: is mute that point, it doesn't matter because the reality
Speaker 2: is the messages have been leaked. There are times Pete
Speaker 2: Hex's team update time now eleven forty four Eastern weather
Speaker 2: is favorable. Just confirmed with Sentcom we are a go
Speaker 2: for mission launch. Okay, well, look, maybe this is no
Speaker 2: longer a secret, but maybe it is. Look, if an
Speaker 2: unauthorized individual was invited to the party in this conversation,
Speaker 2: could he have easily talked about this at the time
Speaker 2: that this was happening. How fast do you think that
Speaker 2: that message could have spread to where all of a sudden,
Speaker 2: it's like, hey, attack is happening. Now, get ready, make
Speaker 2: sure that everything is prepared and that nobody is there,
Speaker 2: and that we don't take any casualties, or we can
Speaker 2: come up with countermeasures right away. Now, there's there's a
Speaker 2: screenshot here that I have. Look, you can search social
Speaker 2: media everywhere for this. It's been leaked. Goldberg has also
Speaker 2: leaked these things. I don't even know if it's actually
Speaker 2: in the Atlantic in a release, but he's spoken about
Speaker 2: it and he's released some of the information. And I
Speaker 2: also got to call out Goldberg here. Look, Jeffrey Goldberger,
Speaker 2: you're not clear you knew you were not supposed to
Speaker 2: be a part of this. Wouldn't you, as an American citizen,
Speaker 2: someone who's concerned for the safety of America, its militaries
Speaker 2: and others. Shouldn't you have chimed in and said, wehlla,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, guys, I don't think I should be
Speaker 2: a part of this conversation, so that they could have
Speaker 2: been aware and readjusted, and maybe you could have excused yourself.
Speaker 2: But no, you chose to stay on the chat to
Speaker 2: view everything you could, to get all the information. Because
Speaker 2: the slimy, little fuck toard journalist in you couldn't put
Speaker 2: America first either. You had to put yourself first. Because
Speaker 2: what you did after the fact was say, well, hey,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to spread us around. I'm just I'm
Speaker 2: just asking questions and blowing the whistle here. Look, we
Speaker 2: have a breach or something going on. Then later you
Speaker 2: leaked more information about it because by then it was
Speaker 2: deemed to not be classified info. Look, the action has
Speaker 2: already happened, the operation is done. So now are like,
Speaker 2: you know what, whatever, here you go, guys, Look we
Speaker 2: have a problem here, and now you're going on a
Speaker 2: little bit of a speaking tour and getting interviewed about it. No,
Speaker 2: because the slimy journalist in you who wants to click
Speaker 2: some likes couldn't help yourself either. My opinion, my opinion, Jeffrey,
Speaker 2: come at me. I don't really give a fuck. But
Speaker 2: Peter heg Seth, mister, he says Secretary of Defense Hegseeth.
Speaker 2: You need to do better too. You need to take
Speaker 2: response of fucking ability. You need to apologize to the
Speaker 2: American people. You have to realize that this is an issue.
Speaker 2: You can't just discredit it because of you know, some
Speaker 2: journalists who claim to be a misinformation propaganist who was
Speaker 2: behind various hoaxes that they reported to not be true,
Speaker 2: was in on this, Like, you can't. There's no level
Speaker 2: of words or operations of discrediting an individual you could
Speaker 2: take at this point, because you can't deny the information
Speaker 2: that was leaked was not true because it happened the
Speaker 2: operation happened. There are too many people involved that know
Speaker 2: that these things happened. And so where you at, Peter. Listen, Pete.
Speaker 2: A lot of people trusted you, a lot of people
Speaker 2: were behind you being put into this position. Don't let
Speaker 2: America down. You got to be better. You got to
Speaker 2: be the guy that is not afraid to take the
Speaker 2: brunt of the blow. You need to defend yourself, but
Speaker 2: you also need to realize when there has been a
Speaker 2: wrong and you need to assure the American people that
Speaker 2: you're not going to stand for this and it will
Speaker 2: never happen again. But you didn't do that. You kept
Speaker 2: digging yourself a hole by trying to defend yourself and
Speaker 2: discredit others for the incident, when in reality, the buck
Speaker 2: stops with you, my friend, you are the guy who
Speaker 2: needs to speak up and needs to right the ship
Speaker 2: and correct the error. Period. Do that, Shut your fucking mouth,
Speaker 2: move forward, and all should be well. All should be well,
Speaker 2: but correct the mistake and don't ever make it again.
Speaker 2: Now let's move on to other matters of concern. Tensions
Speaker 2: are rising globally over various conflicts between various nations, and
Speaker 2: of course, the US is involved. In most of them,
Speaker 2: as people expect the US to offer their support. But
Speaker 2: let's talk about another issue that has come to light
Speaker 2: that is escalating, and that is one between the US
Speaker 2: and Iran. So Iran refuses to negotiate and come to
Speaker 2: a deal on its nuclear program. You see, there has
Speaker 2: been a long standing deal or at least there has
Speaker 2: been some sort of arrangement regarding Iran's nuclear program ever
Speaker 2: since I think it was the eighties or late seventies,
Speaker 2: somewhere in there, when the Islamic regime change happened, the
Speaker 2: extreme Islamic regime change anyway, So here we are, and
Speaker 2: today Iran's like, no, no, no, you know, we're not
Speaker 2: going to comply. We're not going to do anything to
Speaker 2: make a deal with the United States of America. And
Speaker 2: the more recent agreement I believe was penned in twenty fifteen,
Speaker 2: and I believe every so many years we're kind of
Speaker 2: just check in on this agreement. But the whole premise is, look,
Speaker 2: we don't want or most of the world doesn't want
Speaker 2: Iran to develop nuclear weapons. They want to limit their
Speaker 2: nuclear capabilities. Why well, because most of the world believes
Speaker 2: that Iran is crazy enough to just use them, just
Speaker 2: willy nilly, like, hey, we're going to use this nuclear
Speaker 2: weapon because we can now. The original well not the original,
Speaker 2: but the agreement back that was finally in twenty fifteen
Speaker 2: was you know, between five permanent members of the United Nations.
Speaker 2: So there's China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US.
Speaker 2: I think it was US and Germany together on this,
Speaker 2: and it also involved other members of the European Union.
Speaker 2: So most of the world really wants to keep Iran's
Speaker 2: nuclear weapons capabilities under control, which at the time included
Speaker 2: China and Russia. Now I don't know if China's changed
Speaker 2: their tune lately, but while China does look to keep
Speaker 2: their partnership with Iran solidified and continue to make money
Speaker 2: with Iran and improve their efforts in commerce between the
Speaker 2: two countries, even China knows that it Ran may just
Speaker 2: be crazy enough to use nuclear weapons. Now, China's a
Speaker 2: nuclear power, so is Russian, so is the US. And
Speaker 2: for the most part, while the US and China may
Speaker 2: disagree and we don't like each other, and everybody thinks
Speaker 2: Russia is dangerous country ran by a tyrannical, murderous dictator
Speaker 2: or authoritarian presence in Vladimir Putin. The reality is all
Speaker 2: these countries, China, US and Russia are using nuclear warheads
Speaker 2: and nuclear weapons as more of a deterrent to keep
Speaker 2: things from getting out of control, because it's like, hey,
Speaker 2: you got a big dick. I got a big dick. Look,
Speaker 2: we all got big dicks. We're all swinging seven to
Speaker 2: ten entries here. What are we doing? Do we really
Speaker 2: want to do this? Do we really want to start
Speaker 2: going to war on a very nuclear level here? Do
Speaker 2: we want to do that?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 2: No, we don't. We don't. But Iran seems to not
Speaker 2: be able to be trusted when it comes to this.
Speaker 2: So fast forward and here we go. Trump is, I
Speaker 2: had to come to the table with Iran to make
Speaker 2: a deal, a deal that would minimize or take away
Speaker 2: sanctions on Iran so that they're able to trade openly
Speaker 2: on all the markets, including that with the US. I believe.
Speaker 2: But the problem is is Iran saying, nah, fuck that,
Speaker 2: we're not doing that. We're not gonna do it, We're
Speaker 2: not gonna comply, We're not gonna come to deal. We
Speaker 2: don't want to, we don't want to talk to you,
Speaker 2: we don't want engage with you. We don't care. We're
Speaker 2: gonna do our own thing. We do not comply, We
Speaker 2: don't give a damp And Iran's a sovereign nation, they
Speaker 2: have a right to do whatever they want, and so
Speaker 2: Trump has threatened Iran. Reading from Reuters a report least
Speaker 2: March thirtieth, Washington March thith, US President Donald Trump threatened
Speaker 2: Iran on Sunday with bombing and secondary tariffs if Tehran
Speaker 2: did not come to an agreement with Washington over snuclear program,
Speaker 2: and Trump's first from mark since Iran rejected direct negotiations
Speaker 2: with Washington last week. He told NBC News that US
Speaker 2: and Iranian officials were talking, but did not elaborate. Trump
Speaker 2: goes on to say and is quoted saying that if
Speaker 2: they don't make a deal, there will be bombing. Trump
Speaker 2: said in a telephone interview, it will be bombing the
Speaker 2: likes of which they have never seen before. And so
Speaker 2: Iran has responded this. Coming from the Telegraph, it says
Speaker 2: that Iran has warned that it will target British forces
Speaker 2: in the Chagos Islands if Donald Trump attacks the Middle
Speaker 2: Eastern nation. After mister Trump threatened military actions against the
Speaker 2: regime if it did not make a deal with the
Speaker 2: US over its New Year program. A senior Irenian military
Speaker 2: official told The Telegraph that Tehran would strike the joint
Speaker 2: US UK naval base on Diego Garcia in response to
Speaker 2: any US attack. There will be no distinction in targeting
Speaker 2: British or American forces if Iran is attacked from any
Speaker 2: base in the region or within the range of Iranian missiles.
Speaker 2: He added, when the time comes, it won't matter whether
Speaker 2: you're an American, British or Turkish soldier. You will be
Speaker 2: targeted if your base is used by Americans. Iranian state
Speaker 2: media said that Tehran would strike the Diego Garcia facility
Speaker 2: with ballistic missiles and suicide drones and retaliation for any
Speaker 2: US hostile action against the Iranian nation. It warned, Iran
Speaker 2: possesses adequate weapons for such an attack from its mainland,
Speaker 2: such as newer versions of the Kora Mashir. I can't
Speaker 2: even pronounce it correctly, but anyway, certain newer versions of
Speaker 2: this missile that have in an intermediate range, and the
Speaker 2: shah Head one thirty six B Kamakazi drone with a
Speaker 2: range of four thousand kilometers. So there you have it.
Speaker 2: Iran is putting their foot down. They're threatening the US directly,
Speaker 2: and I get it. They don't want to be under
Speaker 2: the US's thumb. They're a sovereign nation. They have a
Speaker 2: right to control themselves, their own programs, whatever. But the
Speaker 2: US isn't the only nation concerned with Iran's capabilities if
Speaker 2: they develop a nuclear weapon. The world is concerned. We
Speaker 2: know that Iran will wipe Israel off the face of
Speaker 2: the earth that they can, and they've already said they're
Speaker 2: not gonna make any distinction against any country. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're gonna use the US as an excuse, but it
Speaker 2: sounds like they just want to start going to war
Speaker 2: with somebody. Now, can we afford this war? Can anybody
Speaker 2: afford another large scale war in the Middle East? In fact,
Speaker 2: I have a feeling that if this happens, if this
Speaker 2: pops off as they say, that this will be a
Speaker 2: very large scale war in Middle East that can drag
Speaker 2: in Russia and China. See, the tensions here are real
Speaker 2: because both Russia and China are allies of Iran. And
Speaker 2: if that's not enough, China is an ally of Russia.
Speaker 2: Russia is still fighting Ukraine. We still can't come to
Speaker 2: a deal there and France are completely supporting Zelenski, and
Speaker 2: we may very well be dragged into a war there
Speaker 2: as well, if anything to back up our allies and
Speaker 2: quite possibly save their ass. Maybe I'm not gonna take
Speaker 2: anything away from the United Kingdom or from France, but
Speaker 2: let's just be honest. Russia is a formidable force. But
Speaker 2: if all of Europe stands together, they may have a chance.
Speaker 2: But in the end, we know the US is going
Speaker 2: to have to step in, and the US rightly should.
Speaker 2: We need to protect our allies. We need to jump
Speaker 2: to their defense, especially with such a major threat. But
Speaker 2: if that happens, then now we got to look at
Speaker 2: China jumping in. Iran has already sent drones and other
Speaker 2: capabilities to Russia and support of the war on Ukraine.
Speaker 2: North Korea is also backing Russia currently with troops over
Speaker 2: there fighting against the Ukraine. So anything right now can
Speaker 2: trigger a world war. And now Iran is saying, look,
Speaker 2: we're not involved in this whole Ukraine debacle, and they're
Speaker 2: not directly saying it, but just stick with me. They're
Speaker 2: not really involved in that directly, but now they're saying,
Speaker 2: you know what, fuck you us, We're not going to comply.
Speaker 2: We're not going to talk, We're not going to negotiate. We're
Speaker 2: just gonna bomb you if you so much as dare
Speaker 2: look in our direction. We're going to bomb your allies
Speaker 2: and anybody who has a US base that you choose
Speaker 2: to use in attacking Iran. Now why is this such
Speaker 2: a big deal. Well, Iran uses proxies to attack the
Speaker 2: US and it's allies in the Middle East. We're talking
Speaker 2: the Houthis, for example, who have attacked merchant ships in
Speaker 2: the Red Sea, and in response, the US has well,
Speaker 2: they've they've bombed or missiled the Houthis, and and Iran
Speaker 2: has been vocal and all this, and Iran is now saying,
Speaker 2: you know what, We're going to start being indiscriminate and
Speaker 2: just bombing US bases and their allies that have US
Speaker 2: bases if the US attacks Iran. And they're using this
Speaker 2: whole nuclear program negotiation as the excuse. But we all
Speaker 2: know that they've just been itching to do this anyway
Speaker 2: and have been indirected doing so through its many terrorist
Speaker 2: organizations or their proxies. So Iran is at the point
Speaker 2: now that they're making direct threats against the US. So
Speaker 2: will President Trump follow through his promise. Is he going
Speaker 2: to start bombing Iran? Is he going to indiscriminately go
Speaker 2: after Iran and wipe them off the face of the earth.
Speaker 2: How many innocent people will be killed in this exchange?
Speaker 2: And what's hard about the Middle East from my understanding
Speaker 2: anyway outside looking in with many of these conflicts is
Speaker 2: the terrorist organizations and groups who carry out these attacks
Speaker 2: integrate themselves into society. They're so intertwined. It's hard to
Speaker 2: target them, and it's hard to attack them directly because
Speaker 2: they put themselves right into the general population because in
Speaker 2: their mind they won't get blown up or attacked because
Speaker 2: they know that nations like the US would prefer not
Speaker 2: to go after and kill innocent civilians. So how is
Speaker 2: Trump going to handle this? I mean, we can do
Speaker 2: strategic strikes. We have the technology's capabilities to carry them
Speaker 2: out very accurately, and we can use special forces to
Speaker 2: target high ranking individuals in Iran. I mean, we've used
Speaker 2: the seals to take out Osama b and Laden. I'm
Speaker 2: sure that if the US really really really wanted to,
Speaker 2: I mean really wanted to, they can take out heads
Speaker 2: of state of Iran. I'm not sure what the right
Speaker 2: move here is there's a lot of back and forth,
Speaker 2: a lot of talk, a lot of posturing, but the
Speaker 2: world is really a powder cake. I mean, think about it.
Speaker 2: We've got the Ukraine Russian situation where that I mean,
Speaker 2: we're just we're just a hair's breadth from walking into
Speaker 2: World War three there. And now we have Iran popping
Speaker 2: off over here in the Middle East, not that they
Speaker 2: have ever been silent or peaceful necessarily.
Speaker 9: But.
Speaker 2: They're directly threatening the US and its allies. And then
Speaker 2: we got to still think about the fact that we
Speaker 2: got China over here, who is an ally of Iran,
Speaker 2: an ally of Russia, and either of these conflicts can
Speaker 2: draw all three of these nations together around Russia and
Speaker 2: China to come together to fight the United States and allies.
Speaker 2: Crazy times, crazy times. And I'm just delivering the information here.
Speaker 2: I don't have an answer. I'm not in that position
Speaker 2: to give you an answer on what's right or wrong here,
Speaker 2: But I want to make everybody aware of what's happening,
Speaker 2: and I want you to think on it a bit,
Speaker 2: because there is a real threat looming here that we
Speaker 2: all may have to face that I don't believe it
Speaker 2: is going to be landlocked. It's you know, it's not
Speaker 2: going to stay local to any nation where the war's
Speaker 2: being fought. This may reach over into the United States
Speaker 2: itself on our own soil, and we have to be
Speaker 2: aware of that and be prepared to be ready. There
Speaker 2: are people that are smarter than me when it comes
Speaker 2: to these things and making these assessments, but I have
Speaker 2: to go with my gut on this, and I have
Speaker 2: to say be ready, be prepared, stay vigilant, keep your
Speaker 2: head on a swivel, and don't be afraid to call
Speaker 2: things out if it just doesn't look right, Because I
Speaker 2: think we're under a real threat to our safety and
Speaker 2: security on our own soil, and we are definitely under
Speaker 2: a constant threat and security situation abroad with our allies.
Speaker 2: We're getting closer and closer to a large scale confrontation
Speaker 2: that for years everybody has been trying to avoid. And
Speaker 2: maybe it's unavoidable. Maybe it's unavoidable, and I'm hoping that
Speaker 2: a lot of this is just a bunch of hot
Speaker 2: air and talk and posting. But you know, when you
Speaker 2: look at what's happening here and getting back to China,
Speaker 2: by the way, which who's increased their military exercises and
Speaker 2: bullying out in that Asia Pacific region. Plus you know
Speaker 2: what's going on again, as I said, with Iran and
Speaker 2: what's going on with the Ukraine Russia war. I have
Speaker 2: a feeling that, I mean, this is just such, this
Speaker 2: whole situation is literally a hair's breath, I mean a
Speaker 2: hair's breath Think about that statement. A hair's breath away
Speaker 2: from a globally catastrophic incident that will affect all of humanity.
Speaker 2: And I hate to end this show on such a
Speaker 2: downer and such a down note, but we've got to
Speaker 2: look at the realities. We've got to be smarter, we
Speaker 2: got to be prepared, we've got to be able to
Speaker 2: recognize the signs that may lead to our own downfall
Speaker 2: and maybe that of the entire planet. I mean this,
Speaker 2: this is very scary times right now. And with that
Speaker 2: I will leave you and hopefully not leave you with nightmares.
Speaker 2: Please like, subscribe, and share the show. Remember visit worldblacepodcast
Speaker 2: dot com for updates and to follow and support. Have
Speaker 2: a great day. Contain of your field at Tension Devils
Speaker 2: Higher your higher Temption.
Speaker 5: Hag stands on the get Doo Doo Doo doo doo doo, doo,
Speaker 5: doo do