Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. When we were growing up, we heard that
Speaker 1: there were a few things that were guaranteed, one of
Speaker 1: them death, the other taxes. Well, now there's a third,
Speaker 1: and that third guarantee is that Todd Blanche is going
Speaker 1: to do whatever he can to continue to protect Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and the other people that were adjacent to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: And now Todd Blanche is once again being called out
Speaker 1: by Ted Lou. And imagine you're such an incompetent that
Speaker 1: somebody like Ted Lou actually has a vector of attack
Speaker 1: on you. What does that say about you? Because believe
Speaker 1: me when I tell you, I'm no big fan of
Speaker 1: Ted Lou. As you all know, I think a lot
Speaker 1: of these people that are involved in this committee are
Speaker 1: doing it for the wrong reasons, and of course, the
Speaker 1: vast majority of those reasons are political. But guess what,
Speaker 1: I don't care. I've already told you that I'm willing
Speaker 1: to ride these sons of bitches as far as we can.
Speaker 1: But if you think I trust any of them, you
Speaker 1: have not been paying attention. And that's why I find
Speaker 1: it laughable when people talk about something like Tyler Robinson,
Speaker 1: and they're being a gigantic cover up. For those of
Speaker 1: us who have been following what a cover up looks like,
Speaker 1: we already know the score. And if you're really looking
Speaker 1: for a cover up, and you want to find government
Speaker 1: dysfunction and you want to find malfeasance, this is where
Speaker 1: to look. And I find it a bit ironic that
Speaker 1: the man who talked about draining the swamp actually just
Speaker 1: filled it back up. This article was published by rawstory
Speaker 1: dot com and the headline missing Epstein files reports spurs
Speaker 1: deemed to accuse Todd Blanche of a legal activity. This
Speaker 1: article was authored by Alexander Willis. Well, how many times
Speaker 1: are they going to accuse him of a legal activity?
Speaker 1: Are they ever going to do anything about it? Is
Speaker 1: there ever going to be any repercussions for his bullshit?
Speaker 1: Because from more'm sitting, that doesn't seem like it's ever coming.
Speaker 1: And if anybody should be held accountable at this point,
Speaker 1: it should be Todd Blanche. And I truly believe that.
Speaker 1: And I think that if we had a real country,
Speaker 1: where we had people who were serious about justice and
Speaker 1: not just politics, that's exactly what would happen. And I
Speaker 1: just want them to understand this administration that this is
Speaker 1: not going to go away when they leave office. That's
Speaker 1: just not going to occur. In fact, we're going to
Speaker 1: do a post mortem like we've been doing about every
Speaker 1: administration that's come before, and there's going to be some
Speaker 1: serious questions to answer. And if these people think they're
Speaker 1: going to continue their political careers after stuffing this shit
Speaker 1: in a bunker, they have another thing coming because they're
Speaker 1: going to meet heavy resistance. I'm not exactly what you
Speaker 1: would call a political activist these days, but I'm certainly
Speaker 1: taking note of all of the senators in congressmen who
Speaker 1: don't vote accordingly, and with election season upon us, well,
Speaker 1: we're going to have some episodes where we're talking about
Speaker 1: these candidates, and you better believe that their record when
Speaker 1: it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and transparency is going to
Speaker 1: be front and center. Representative Ted lu openly accused Attorney
Speaker 1: General Todd Blanche of a legal conduct on Saturday, on
Speaker 1: the heels of a new report then an alleged trove
Speaker 1: of missing handwritten FBI notes related to Jeffrey Epstein had
Speaker 1: been sitting online for months, fully unredacted and accessible to anyone.
Speaker 1: I've had about ten files that I've saved completely disappear
Speaker 1: from the internet. But sure, they're the most transparent administration
Speaker 1: in history. It's so laughable that anybody would try and
Speaker 1: pump that shit, and anybody telling me that, I automatically
Speaker 1: think they're a liar, because how can you look at
Speaker 1: somebody with a straight face and say that that kind
Speaker 1: of nonsense. It's absurd, literally absurd. The supposed note stemmed
Speaker 1: from a twenty nineteen interview with the South Carolina woman
Speaker 1: who accused President Donald Trump and Epstein of sexually and
Speaker 1: physically abusing her starting when she was thirteen years old.
Speaker 1: Referred to as Jane do four, the woman was interviewed
Speaker 1: by the FBI four times and was found credible by
Speaker 1: the agency. A Justice Department source pulled the Miami Herald
Speaker 1: bro that's because a lot of these women were credible,
Speaker 1: and that's why the DOJ flooded the zone when they
Speaker 1: released the files. Oh, let's talk about cannibalism and beef
Speaker 1: jerky and let all of the most undesirable scumbags on
Speaker 1: earth latch onto that shit and avoid all of the
Speaker 1: stuff that could actually hold these people accountable. That's all
Speaker 1: part of the plan, and I think people are finally
Speaker 1: wising up, and I think people are starting to figure
Speaker 1: out the hustle. And the sad truth is a lot
Speaker 1: of these people are praying on your bias. They know
Speaker 1: what people want to hear, and they tickle it. But
Speaker 1: that's doing you a disservice, especially when we're talking about
Speaker 1: this story, because there's no teams, there's no sides, there's
Speaker 1: no good guys, there's only cowards and liars. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 1: Justice Department has not released the sought after handwritten FBI notes,
Speaker 1: which are among the Epstein related files being sought by
Speaker 1: former MSNBC host and attorney Kady Fang with her ongoing lawsuit.
Speaker 1: The agency is justified with holding Epstein related files by
Speaker 1: describing them as duplicative of material already released. Cool, let's
Speaker 1: see it. How does it hurt anybody if you release
Speaker 1: material that's already been released. It's absurd And everything they
Speaker 1: say about this topic, this story is just as absurd,
Speaker 1: if not more. Literally, everything they say is utter nonsense.
Speaker 1: On Saturday, however, data research and writer ry Howard Stone
Speaker 1: released a new report regarding nearly two dozen of the
Speaker 1: FBI notes, which he claimed had been uploaded by journalist
Speaker 1: Kaylin Diese of the Conservative Washington Examiner. The notes themselves
Speaker 1: also revealed, according to Thang, that they were not, in
Speaker 1: fact duplicative of any documents released thus far. Yo, this
Speaker 1: is the issue that's in front of Judge Sullivan right now.
Speaker 1: And look, Judge Sullivan doesn't play. When he went after
Speaker 1: the prosecutors who went after Senator Stevens up in Alaska,
Speaker 1: I couldn't believe it. Somebody actually had the stones to
Speaker 1: hold the DOJ accountable for their bullshit. And if the
Speaker 1: DJ thinks he's bluffing, they have another thing coming. If
Speaker 1: they don't turn this information over to Judge Sullivan, I
Speaker 1: would expect her to be consequences, and severe consequences. When
Speaker 1: we're talking about careers, I mean, if you get hit
Speaker 1: with contempt, you get sanctioned by the judge that carry
Speaker 1: with you for the rest of your career as a lawyer.
Speaker 1: That's in your jacket, bro. So it's a pretty big deal.
Speaker 1: And I don't know how many of these prosecutors want
Speaker 1: to fall on their sword for Todd, Baby Billy Blanche
Speaker 1: and the dear Leader Lou took to x the publicly
Speaker 1: called out Blanche. Dear Blanche, please tell us the exception
Speaker 1: under the Epstein Files Transparency Act that allowed you to
Speaker 1: withhold the below FBI interview notes from the American People,
Speaker 1: Lou wrote Saturday in a social media post on X,
Speaker 1: tagging Blanche's account on X and resharing commentary related to
Speaker 1: the discovery of the FBI notes. You can't because you're
Speaker 1: an unethical lawyer and illegally withheld those notes. November is coming,
Speaker 1: and one thing that I've noticed on the right is
Speaker 1: that they think this isn't going to be a big
Speaker 1: deal when it comes to the midterms, that people aren't
Speaker 1: really that mad about Epstein. They're making a very very
Speaker 1: big mistake because people I know who are never interested
Speaker 1: in the story before, Oh, they're paying attention now, and
Speaker 1: the vast majority of them, no matter what their political
Speaker 1: affiliation is, is disgusted. So take that for what you will,
Speaker 1: and I think there's a lot of people that are
Speaker 1: going to be voting this issue. The Daily Beast Roger
Speaker 1: Stolenberger called the entire ordeal inexcusable and said he never
Speaker 1: seen something like this. Well, that's because we haven't ever
Speaker 1: seen anything like this. I mean, we're talking about an
Speaker 1: active cover up underway right now as we speak, and
Speaker 1: doing it brazenly right in front of our faces. No remorse,
Speaker 1: no care, no respect, and no fear. And that's because
Speaker 1: they have nothing to fear, right There's no teeth in
Speaker 1: the Epstein law. So what's to stop them from doing
Speaker 1: whatever they want? Unfortunately, folks, the answer is you. When
Speaker 1: you go crazy on the internet, the way you do
Speaker 1: when you follow the story, when you demand justice, when
Speaker 1: you demand accountability, that's the only way to get to
Speaker 1: the point we're trying to get to because they don't
Speaker 1: listen to anything else. The only way they ever pay
Speaker 1: attention is when they think that their power is in jeopardy. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm going to lose hold on my seat, I'm going
Speaker 1: to lose hold on, you know, my position at this institution.
Speaker 1: That's what they fear the most. And I think that
Speaker 1: the only people that can deliver that kind of accountability
Speaker 1: are you, And I think that people have done a
Speaker 1: very good job holding these folks accountable over the past
Speaker 1: few years, and I just hope that it continues, right
Speaker 1: because we're getting closer. I know there's a lot of
Speaker 1: people out there that want to give you doom and
Speaker 1: gloom on a regular basis. And look, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to sit here and you know, blow rainbows up your
Speaker 1: ass either. But does that mean that this is hopeless,
Speaker 1: that there is no chance that we can have some accountability? Hell,
Speaker 1: Noah doesn't. Now, it's certainly not going to be easy.
Speaker 1: But if people just stay the course and continue to
Speaker 1: demand transparency, to demand justice, then I have a feeling
Speaker 1: when we have a new president things are going to change,
Speaker 1: because at this point, there's no doubt that this fish
Speaker 1: stinks from its head and all we're going to get
Speaker 1: from this administration is more BS. So like usual, we'll
Speaker 1: keep an eye on this lawsuit between Katie Fang and
Speaker 1: Todd Blanche and the DOJ, and we'll keep these updates rolling.
Speaker 1: All the information that goes with this episode can be
Speaker 1: found in the description box