Speaker 1: All right, February for twenty twenty six, allegedly according to
Speaker 1: that thing we call a calenter, and it's just after
Speaker 1: nine let's see nine to twelve pm Eastern time here
Speaker 1: on this Wednesday night, Woodin's day. I'm in a bit
Speaker 1: of pain and such, but I figure I'll try and
Speaker 1: complete this before we go any further, and I'll make
Speaker 1: it as short as possible. How about that? What's on
Speaker 1: my mind today? A few things, But before we get deep,
Speaker 1: deep into the weeds on the more popular news cycle items,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera, let's talk for a minute about
Speaker 1: the JFK assassination. What's amazing to me is that three
Speaker 1: different people sent me this information about the Knicks film
Speaker 1: and it making some news and this and that, and
Speaker 1: I find it really fascinating because the last one came
Speaker 1: in today and I wasn't even gonna bother covering it
Speaker 1: until I saw this. Now I'm not gonna name names.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say that one person in this group
Speaker 1: of people, this group of three, seems to get their
Speaker 1: news from left wing and I do mean extremely left
Speaker 1: wing oriented idiotcy on online. It's just what they do.
Speaker 1: Idiocy reigning supreme You know, the the the blue haired,
Speaker 1: bizarrely shaped, allegedly female things are all normal kind of
Speaker 1: left wing lunacy. The Kamala was good for the country lunacy,
Speaker 1: the the the there's nothing wrong with Hillary Clinton except
Speaker 1: you were against her because she was a woman lunacy.
Speaker 1: That left type of news outlet does exist. They're not
Speaker 1: very popular right now. They're losing ground all over the place.
Speaker 1: Take note the Washington Post purging itself with many employees,
Speaker 1: getting rid and cutting down and doing the corporate streamlining
Speaker 1: thing over there. So the Washington Post is not the
Speaker 1: conservative organ that it was when I was a kid.
Speaker 1: It is not the liberal corporatist organ that it has
Speaker 1: been in recent years. It is now being reshaped because
Speaker 1: its owners are bending over backwards to try and make
Speaker 1: Maga happy. And that's what a lot of the corporate
Speaker 1: media is doing right now. But the people that believe
Speaker 1: in all the left wing niceness sent me an article.
Speaker 1: A guy who relies on nothing but the most vanilla
Speaker 1: corporate media sent me an article. And a guy who
Speaker 1: I believe is completely Maga brainwashed sent me an article
Speaker 1: because all he does is make sure that he goes
Speaker 1: to only outlets that are, you know, on the right
Speaker 1: wing side of things and on the right side of
Speaker 1: history in his mind. Anyway, here's the fallacy in all
Speaker 1: three of their approaches, and why it is I'm a
Speaker 1: useless piece of garbage that nobody wants to listen to anymore,
Speaker 1: because you're all stupid, all of you. Look these left,
Speaker 1: right wing and vanilla outlets that you think are independent
Speaker 1: but are just nothing but bad carbon copies of corporate media,
Speaker 1: all of them either your left wing stupid, your right
Speaker 1: wing stupid, or your corporate media stupid. And you think
Speaker 1: you're listening to an alternative that is just following on.
Speaker 1: You all got the news after a Sunday publication in
Speaker 1: the New York Post where they covered some information and
Speaker 1: made a big deal out of, you know, Gail nick
Speaker 1: Jackson and her lawsuit, and they're about what nine months
Speaker 1: behind me on the yes, because I already told you
Speaker 1: about it, and right wing stupid. Let's go right wing
Speaker 1: stupid for a minute. The right wing stupid is so
Speaker 1: stupid that they let the AI rewrite the freaking news
Speaker 1: story so that they could, you know, take out any
Speaker 1: possible left wing slants on it. And these idiots keep
Speaker 1: referring to it as a videotape from nineteen seventy eight.
Speaker 1: Also can't keep The New York Post straight from the
Speaker 1: New York Times in their own stupid short article, which
Speaker 1: is not there for you to read. Really, it's just
Speaker 1: there's clickbait, because that's what right wing is good at.
Speaker 1: Forget the details, let's mishmash it, get them all wrong,
Speaker 1: and make sure we get you riled up. That's right wing.
Speaker 1: Guess what, it's very similar to left wing stupid, where
Speaker 1: they do all that, get none of the details right,
Speaker 1: but wants you to feel bad for people because there's
Speaker 1: so many victims. And meanwhile, you could have heard this
Speaker 1: story on my show when I was trying to talk
Speaker 1: to Gail and did talk to Gail in the run
Speaker 1: up to Dallas in twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: It's not news.
Speaker 1: The Post needed a space filler, so they stuck this
Speaker 1: thing on their website. There's nothing new there. Nineteen seventy eight,
Speaker 1: they had this tape, you know, the Health select They
Speaker 1: don't even mention how select me. They just say the
Speaker 1: Congress had a tape and they wouldn't give it up.
Speaker 1: It's the HSCA who had an eight millimeter piece of film,
Speaker 1: not a tape, but you know they had possession of it.
Speaker 1: And the whole thing about a recent victory in the courts,
Speaker 1: again nine months ago at least. I'm talking to Gail
Speaker 1: about this on this show. I already told you about it,
Speaker 1: but you don't care because you pay attention to it
Speaker 1: only when it comes through the right filter. You don't
Speaker 1: like my filter because my filter points out where your
Speaker 1: people don't care about the details or the actual evidence
Speaker 1: in anything, because they just want to spin it to
Speaker 1: get your emotional reaction. And they from three people who
Speaker 1: care about the jfk assassination and might be interested in
Speaker 1: evidence that's really being released to people. And they also
Speaker 1: got the amount of money wrong when it came to
Speaker 1: what's you know, what's they're being sued for. They got
Speaker 1: the courts wrong. I mean, the left wing people are
Speaker 1: terrible about all the procedure. Everything in the courts. They
Speaker 1: got wrong, everything about what the law is that compelled
Speaker 1: this Steven be an issue, et cetera. They don't even
Speaker 1: name the Zappruterer film correctly on the left wing side,
Speaker 1: and on the right wing side, they're too stupid to
Speaker 1: know that there weren't videotapes being utilized in this circumstance.
Speaker 1: Even though Sony did make available a Beta Max videotape
Speaker 1: in the nineteen sixties, you know that somebody could have
Speaker 1: brought to the United States. It wasn't a commonplace consumer product.
Speaker 1: They were still using the Bell and Howel cameras, you know,
Speaker 1: with the eight milimeter the sixteen milimeter that you got
Speaker 1: to take and flip over and then take to get
Speaker 1: it developed, and then they split it and slice it.
Speaker 1: That whole mess is what everybody was using commonly in
Speaker 1: the United States because nobody had the money to go
Speaker 1: buy a Beta Max from Sony, which did exist, yes,
Speaker 1: in nineteen sixty three. So they're too stupid to correct
Speaker 1: the technology the common parlance, exactly where the thing came from,
Speaker 1: get their fact straight or anything else. And all of
Speaker 1: you are listening to recycled crap thinking that it's something new,
Speaker 1: even though if you just listen to my program, which
Speaker 1: out of the three of you, I think at least
Speaker 1: two of you do, you don't realize I already told
Speaker 1: you about this nine months ago. Thank you, thank you
Speaker 1: for listening. Appreciate you. But this is the point about
Speaker 1: why there's no point because literally, our own government, and
Speaker 1: here's the punchline to today's news show, our own government.
Speaker 1: I tweeted this c at Elon Musk. I'm sure he's
Speaker 1: not going to pay attention to it, but I tweeted
Speaker 1: it to him when he's going, Oh, look, you know,
Speaker 1: zero of Epstein's co conspirators have been convicted. Look at
Speaker 1: the counter that's at zero. Get real clever there, Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: You're reposting stuff on your own social media platform and
Speaker 1: you're trying to tell people how right you are, But
Speaker 1: let me tell you how righteous you're not the US
Speaker 1: government literally, and this is a fact, not an opinion.
Speaker 1: So you know, go stuff your right wing dildo up
Speaker 1: your whatever hole you want, Go stuff your left wing
Speaker 1: dildo over whatever holes you want, and do it politely
Speaker 1: if you're left winging, and you know, if your milk toast,
Speaker 1: you probably don't know what a dildo is, and you're
Speaker 1: probably just you know, listening to CNN still even as
Speaker 1: the ground shifts under you, and it's becoming a maga
Speaker 1: outlet because of who owns it now, and CBS is too,
Speaker 1: but they pay no attention, pay no attention, to what
Speaker 1: I'm about to say, because it's a fact, which is
Speaker 1: something that you people avoid by going to your give
Speaker 1: me my opinions fed back to me outlets do that.
Speaker 1: Keep doing it, keep doing it, not supporting me, and
Speaker 1: pay them jacksticks. Anyways, Yeah, the US government published Kitty
Speaker 1: Horn basically is what they did when the Epstein dropped.
Speaker 1: Because they don't know what they're doing. They're inapt Tulca
Speaker 1: Gabber's a moron down in Georgia, going to Fulton County
Speaker 1: looking for you know, the non existent vote manipulation in
Speaker 1: Fulton County. You know, even in a place where they win,
Speaker 1: they don't want to say they won. Trump shouldn't even
Speaker 1: been as close to Biden as he was in Georgia
Speaker 1: just because a backlash, but because of the fact that
Speaker 1: the GOP runs the state up and down. There was
Speaker 1: no vote manipulation in Georgia toward Trump or against Trump.
Speaker 1: If anything, he got higher numbers than he should have.
Speaker 1: But you know, pay no attention to what was actually
Speaker 1: purged and pay no attention to what it is you
Speaker 1: guys dropped forty days past the deadline based on your
Speaker 1: own Orange Julius Jesus Julius Caesar, pedophile, freaking president told
Speaker 1: you to do in his executive order. You're forty days late,
Speaker 1: and you still can't avoid at first publishing Kenny Bourne
Speaker 1: because they did. They published nude photos unredacted, nothing covered
Speaker 1: up of underage girls on the DOJ website in the
Speaker 1: Epstein files drop, and then the New York Times started
Speaker 1: flagging a bunch of this stuff, like dudes, what are
Speaker 1: you doing? And they went back and pulled most of it.
Speaker 1: There's probably still some of it in there, but also
Speaker 1: other things that are in there. Accuse everybody from Bill Gates,
Speaker 1: Michael Jackson, princes in Saudi Arabia, people with titles in England,
Speaker 1: I mean Mosad connections, everything this Epstein cases and Trump
Speaker 1: mentioned ten thousand times in the files, although he said
Speaker 1: on TV they never mentioned trub because they don't want
Speaker 1: to dare to. And yes, Bill Clinton and other media
Speaker 1: people did I mention Bill Gates yet Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: I did, you know, just saying just saying, these people
Speaker 1: are all over the five unredacted uncovered stuff. The only
Speaker 1: things they tried to cover up were the victim's statements,
Speaker 1: even though they should have just covered their names. But
Speaker 1: they didn't protect their names. They protected the statements. You
Speaker 1: know why, because they're protecting the pedos. But you know,
Speaker 1: I'm crazy, right, I got sound clips before I get
Speaker 1: to my next issue, and I don't want to stay
Speaker 1: on this. Okay, maybe we'll talk about it ran soon.
Speaker 3: Maybe that'll be the next segment.
Speaker 4: Okay, Vladimir, it's time to sign the Sea Science MO.
Speaker 2: Vladimir, it's time time for me to say no.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's about the size of that. And you know,
Speaker 1: pay no other attention, pay no other attention to what's
Speaker 1: going on in Ukraine because that doesn't matter anymore, right,
Speaker 1: interviews and statements? What is going on with the Epstein files?
Speaker 1: According to Let's see what is this? Is this one
Speaker 1: of the new CBS slapdogs for MAGA? I think it is,
Speaker 1: but let's see one of the new CBS mac. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let me just check it out and see what it does.
Speaker 5: Outrage growing as new details emerged from the millions of
Speaker 5: newly released Justice Department records on convicted sex offender Jeffrey
Speaker 5: Jeffrey Epstein. Amongst the thousands of photos, these never before
Speaker 5: seen images of former Prince Andrew, who was stripped of
Speaker 5: his royal titles last year over his relationship with Epstein.
Speaker 5: Now seen here crouched over a young woman, her face predacted.
Speaker 1: Crouched over a young woman who seems incapacitated in various poses.
Speaker 1: If you got the originals without the blacks box over
Speaker 1: her face, she definitely does not look like she's fully
Speaker 1: with it. So is she drunk?
Speaker 3: Ohdeed?
Speaker 1: What are they on a bed? Are they on a matt?
Speaker 1: Are they on the floor? You're not sure? It's really
Speaker 1: interesting photographs. Prince Andrew, that's one guy. Don't talk about
Speaker 1: him though, you know he definitely can't do that in
Speaker 1: the UK. Well maybe he can. He doesn't have a
Speaker 1: title anymore. I don't know.
Speaker 5: The date and context of the interaction are unclear, and
Speaker 5: representatives for Andrew have not responded to a request for comment.
Speaker 5: New information on earthing exactly what law enforcement knew about
Speaker 5: Epstein's crimes, including this stunning prosecution memo and draft indictment
Speaker 5: written nearly two decades ago, across forty five pages, prosecutors
Speaker 5: in Florida detailing disturbing evidence gathered against the financier, calling
Speaker 5: him a continued danger to the community based upon his
Speaker 5: continued enticement of underage girls.
Speaker 1: Yeah, continued enticement of underage girls, which you know later
Speaker 1: on ten thousand mentions of Donald Trump in his notes
Speaker 1: in his blackmail emails that he sent to himself to
Speaker 1: make sure he kept his notes straight on everybody, and
Speaker 1: Bill Gates too, and Bill Gates and the VD and
Speaker 1: how about some rape charges And then they forced you know,
Speaker 1: girls who had like Down syndrome but didn't look like
Speaker 1: they had Down syndrome to have abortions. And she's writing
Speaker 1: poems about it. I mean, it is an endless mess.
Speaker 1: But I mean that's not serious news.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: Olive oil prices have more than doubled following extreme weather,
Speaker 1: which sadly has forced many New Jersey residents to bathe
Speaker 1: in water. You know, I can't say Saturday Night Live
Speaker 1: missus all the time, right, I don't know? How about
Speaker 1: this from the left wing stupid media.
Speaker 7: And who was, by the way, in multiple instances in
Speaker 7: the files that were just released, talking about his work
Speaker 7: for Masade, talking about his work for the Rothschilds. I mean,
Speaker 7: it just goes on and on, and so can we
Speaker 7: discuss the blackmail operation that was taking place and which
Speaker 7: government that's a special ally of the United States put
Speaker 7: him up to it, and do we really want to
Speaker 7: be allies with the country? Thanks that chidnaps young girls
Speaker 7: for rape just so they could have dirt on American
Speaker 7: politicians and control our foreign policy.
Speaker 1: See that was an angry clip from a Pierce Morgan show. Actually,
Speaker 1: where's There's a maga guy squirming in his chair, freaking out,
Speaker 1: pointing at the screen, trying to speak. There's a two
Speaker 1: stone faced, clearly soulless, angry lawyers, one male, one female,
Speaker 1: and Pierce Morgan looking concerned on the screen. You gotta
Speaker 1: love that. Oh wait, was that left wing media or
Speaker 1: right wing media? Which way does Pierce Morgan's windblow at
Speaker 1: this point? Does anybody know? Hey, how about from the
Speaker 1: horse's mouths Epstein himself.
Speaker 8: Church places in the world? Correct?
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, How did a guy like you get on
Speaker 1: the board.
Speaker 8: Of rock a blue blood, internationally known, internationally known, hard research,
Speaker 8: Nobel Prize winners all.
Speaker 1: Over the place?
Speaker 8: How do they pick a guy like you, a trader
Speaker 8: from basically some guy from bear Seerns.
Speaker 1: They're asking him in this interview here I left part
Speaker 1: of the context out for time, but they're asking him,
Speaker 1: how the hell is it you end up on like
Speaker 1: Rockefeller research think tank panels and stuff. I mean, you're
Speaker 1: a guy who's a day trader and financial advisor and
Speaker 1: you're in the Rockefeller Foundation. What are you doing there?
Speaker 1: It's an interesting question, I think good question.
Speaker 4: So I was asked to be on the board of Rockefeller,
Speaker 4: and I think it was I was on the board
Speaker 4: of Rockefeller. There was a money manager who said, Rockefeller
Speaker 4: needs someone with financial expertise because the university is growing
Speaker 4: and there's lots of new things. You have to again,
Speaker 4: we go back to the original discussion in the last time,
Speaker 4: and up until the mid eighties or sort of early
Speaker 4: mid seventies, the most important thing was your name. If
Speaker 4: you were a Rockefeller, you already were considered to be brilliant.
Speaker 4: If you were head of General Motors, it was your reputation.
Speaker 4: It was who you knew, who your family was, what
Speaker 4: was your character. And then in the mid seventies, basically
Speaker 4: if you remember, you probably had a calculator. It was
Speaker 4: very advanced in those days to have a Texas instrument
Speaker 4: calculator where it could by putting in the numbers, it
Speaker 4: would multiply for you to do square roots. And that
Speaker 4: was the first and everyone who had a calculator was
Speaker 4: already advanced on Wall Street.
Speaker 1: I love this nineteen seventies eighties recollections of like well,
Speaker 1: you know, it was kind of a Dei time and
Speaker 1: they needed a pedophile and a jew so I filled
Speaker 1: both things. By the way, calculators used to be amazing.
Speaker 1: You know, they sent a thing to the moon with
Speaker 1: something that's powered by about the same computing power as
Speaker 1: a calculator. Duh, I tell you, these calculators they're too much.
Speaker 1: You know. They learned how to add tips quicker than
Speaker 1: I could ever get tips. That's right, Hey, you know,
Speaker 1: what are you going to do? And uh, you get
Speaker 1: no respect for any of it?
Speaker 4: A simple almost like your accountant. The most important parts
Speaker 4: of business were really now going to calculations. So it's
Speaker 4: not only mathematical.
Speaker 1: Boy, these computers is amazing. This is the financial genius.
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein speaking in case you don't recognize the voice.
Speaker 4: But it's things that could be calculated. Reputation couldn't be calculated.
Speaker 4: I could give you you a ten on a reputation scale.
Speaker 4: At eight, what does it mean to have a measurement
Speaker 4: of your reputation? We'll get to that later, But people
Speaker 4: places like Rockefeller needed someone to say, Look, we're entering
Speaker 4: a different world where numbers and the numbers of companies.
Speaker 4: Portfolio management was going to be balanced. It was going
Speaker 4: to be statistical. Jeffrey, could you come on the board.
Speaker 1: Because the Rockefellers needed Jeffrey app Steed to teach them
Speaker 1: about money. God, what is there a better like argument
Speaker 1: for don't bang your cousins? I don't know, make it.
Speaker 1: Let me know. Email me info at O'Kelly dot com.
Speaker 1: I will extend the volimes.
Speaker 2: What the effect?
Speaker 6: In Denial of Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks
Speaker 6: by Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US
Speaker 6: covert operations and are still happening today. Larryhancock's book In
Speaker 6: Denial rips the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 6: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 6: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 6: really failed and why the United States did not.
Speaker 9: Learn from it. It also shows why other countries today
Speaker 9: are doing secret operations with more success. This is the
Speaker 9: book that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 9: In Denial, Secret Wars with Air Strikes and tanks Larryhancock.
Speaker 9: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Hancock dot com.
Speaker 9: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot
Speaker 9: com in digital or physical.
Speaker 2: Form Ochili dot com.
Speaker 3: Do you like history? Real history that you were never
Speaker 3: taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and
Speaker 3: Nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with
Speaker 3: new documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes to
Speaker 3: events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War,
Speaker 3: Nuclear Bombs and Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty
Speaker 3: five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at
Speaker 3: Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike.
Speaker 2: Swanson dot com radio.
Speaker 3: Is sponsored by Wall Street, The Window Got Home and
Speaker 3: Listener's Life.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know, the most itivated boyce in all media.
Speaker 1: So before we get into the drones of the day, uh,
Speaker 1: let's talk about you know how they're throwing every single thing.
Speaker 1: And by the way, don't forget to wag the dog
Speaker 1: on your way out, because weird stuff is happening on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. Indeed, there's going to be a need to
Speaker 1: testify for Billy boy Clinton and see what he's got.
Speaker 1: I mean, He's mentioned half as much as Trump is
Speaker 1: in the files. But hey, you know, pay no attention
Speaker 1: to the facts or the numbers or the statistics because
Speaker 1: computers can't calculate us because I'm a genius and a billionaire. Anyways,
Speaker 1: you know, it is what it was, and people are
Speaker 1: getting protected. But the funny thing is drones I saw
Speaker 1: on Capitol Hill, you know, a twenty twenty four story,
Speaker 1: which again was mentioned in passing on this show, but
Speaker 1: you wouldn't know it. They had what nap up on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill looked like testifying about something that happened in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four where near you know, one of those
Speaker 1: Middle Eastern countries. A couple of drones started following this
Speaker 1: crazy orb and decided to shoot a hell fire missile
Speaker 1: at it, and this thing caught it like a baseball.
Speaker 1: Let it blow up, took the shrapnel with it when
Speaker 1: it decided to zip out of the view of the drones.
Speaker 1: Those are US drones near Yemen, by the way. And
Speaker 1: they showed that video in Congress today because anything anything
Speaker 1: at all, you know, Hey, let's try government shutdown a
Speaker 1: couple of days. Oh that didn't work. Let's try putting
Speaker 1: out a thing about UFOs being real. It didn't work
Speaker 1: anything to distract you from you know, Orange. Julius petteris
Speaker 1: up there on Capitol Hill in DC. The District of
Speaker 1: samaritanis by the way. But let's just check in with
Speaker 1: the news outlet. The Christian Broadcasting Network might not expect
Speaker 1: me to check in with one of their reports, but
Speaker 1: I do now and then.
Speaker 10: We have breaking news to share with you. As Reuters
Speaker 10: is reporting an Iranian drone has been shot down nearing
Speaker 10: the USS Abraham Lincoln. Let me read it directly from
Speaker 10: Reuters quote. The US military on Tuesday shot down in
Speaker 10: Iranian drone that quote aggressively approached the Abraham Lincoln aircraft
Speaker 10: carrier in the Arabian Sea. The US military said, in
Speaker 10: an incident first reported by Routers, skipping down, the Iranian
Speaker 10: Shahad one thirty nine drone was flying towards the carrier
Speaker 10: quote with unclear intent and was shot down by a
Speaker 10: F thirty five US fighter jet. The US military said,
Speaker 10: all right, Billy, what do you make of this?
Speaker 11: I mean, look, the tensions are clearly high after you know,
Speaker 11: the US attack on Iran, obviously, every that's been going
Speaker 11: on in the Middle East, This is not a new
Speaker 11: enemy situation. But what is new is it feels like
Speaker 11: the aggressive nature that the Iranian regime is taking. We
Speaker 11: have to put this in the context of what is
Speaker 11: happening there inside that country, with people rising up, sighting back,
Speaker 11: pushing back against the government dominance, against the chast that
Speaker 11: we've seen unfolding there. It seems like that unrest could
Speaker 11: create a situation where the government, which is traditionally unpredictable there,
Speaker 11: becomes even more unpredictable. And a moment like this can
Speaker 11: quickly escalate if it's not handled properly. And so, of
Speaker 11: course we understand why that was shot down, but I
Speaker 11: think the bigger question is is this just a fluke
Speaker 11: or is this the start of something more to come.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, the Christian Broadcasting Network doesn't take the
Speaker 1: time to bother to even ask if this actually friggin
Speaker 1: happened just because Reuter sped it out. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: we're not supposed to trust, I thought, those of you
Speaker 1: on the right, and the Christian right especially, we're not
Speaker 1: supposed to trust any of the mainstream outlets. I mean,
Speaker 1: the Associated pressures no good. Reuters is no good, even
Speaker 1: though they're probably the only two corporations on the planet
Speaker 1: that still have enough resources to cover things around the world.
Speaker 1: That's okay because everything else is being cut to shreds.
Speaker 1: Pay no attention to it. I mean, are we wagging
Speaker 1: the dog? We could ask Seymour Hersh whose most recent
Speaker 1: substack is what comes next in Iran? The question hinges
Speaker 1: on Trump and the Iranian Army. No, Seymour again, you
Speaker 1: got it wrong. You know, the guy gets a lot
Speaker 1: of facts right, but then takes them and organizes them
Speaker 1: into you know, I see eighteen pieces of murder evidence.
Speaker 1: It's obviously a suicide. He just goes in a direction
Speaker 1: and makes a declaration regardless of the evidence that he
Speaker 1: shows you, and people still trust Seymour Hersh. I don't know.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe he's suffering from long term effects as syphlis,
Speaker 1: I mean mentally, he's suffering from something. There's some kind
Speaker 1: of delusion happening, But I can't make a diagnosis anyway.
Speaker 1: What did Trump have to say according to the AP
Speaker 1: and I mean just Trump's words, Sir.
Speaker 5: Ran Supreme Leader today, that that you have could start
Speaker 5: a regional war, give your fund that.
Speaker 1: Why wouldn't you say that?
Speaker 4: Of course you could say that, but the biggest was
Speaker 4: about ships in the world over there very.
Speaker 9: Close a couple of days and hopefully we'll.
Speaker 4: Make a deal.
Speaker 9: We don't make a deal, then we'll find out whether
Speaker 9: or not he was right.
Speaker 1: All right, that was a couple of days ago, and
Speaker 1: the Supreme Leader on I think it was Sunday, might
Speaker 1: have made the threat, so they asked Trump about it
Speaker 1: on a Monday. I had a new way to say that.
Speaker 1: But you know, anyway, keep your eye on Irun please
Speaker 1: because that's probably what's what's next. Just saying I don't
Speaker 1: want it to be that way. But then again, I'm
Speaker 1: thinking maybe it'll clear out some of the true believers
Speaker 1: if they actually see, you know, insane things happening, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, is security at sub stack email addresses
Speaker 1: from your substick. Look at this, there's a data breach
Speaker 1: on substack. I'll tell you anything to distract people from
Speaker 1: and I just got the email of this. Anything to
Speaker 1: distract people from the reality, which is that the DOJ
Speaker 1: literally released kitty porn. They are literally pulling back and
Speaker 1: clawing back all of that, along with all documents that
Speaker 1: mentioned Trump, so they can redact them some more. You
Speaker 1: get in big black pages and enjoy your Epstein files.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, keep having faith in these
Speaker 1: bastards to do anything right. Tulsea Gabbart is obviously insane
Speaker 1: because she should have had control over these document dumps
Speaker 1: no matter how they went, and here we are screw it.
Speaker 1: So you don't believe anything I tell you. I don't
Speaker 1: know why I even bother to speak, because nine months
Speaker 1: later you think something just made the news. And it's
Speaker 1: not just this JFK thing. It's just that I have
Speaker 1: three good examples of people that are completely diverse bied.
Speaker 1: I mean, if I put the three of you in
Speaker 1: a room with just a knife and no furniture, I
Speaker 1: guarantee only one of you might walk out of there.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's how much you guys are diametrically opposed
Speaker 1: to each other, and you all come to the same
Speaker 1: conclusion because you trust these assholes. All right, That's my
Speaker 1: only curse for this one, and I'm gonna close it
Speaker 1: out just so I don't start saying more terrible things,
Speaker 1: because I'm Ocelli and you're the effect. If you support
Speaker 1: what I do, and if you actually listen to what
Speaker 1: I say, good night, you are.
Speaker 12: Uncle do you remember that time when Benjamin Fulford said
Speaker 12: that an Asian secret society was going to dispatch ninja's
Speaker 12: to take down the Illuminati.
Speaker 2: Oh that's interesting.
Speaker 12: Yeah, did that ever work out too good?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 12: It didn't, did it? But here o'celly dot com Radio network.
Speaker 12: Things work out a bit better, don't they?
Speaker 3: Much better?
Speaker 13: Much media is clear and understanding about the programs, The
Speaker 13: programs much clearer, getting live people into it. They really
Speaker 13: have a good conversation going much better, much better scene.
Speaker 12: I say, forget Benjamin Fulford and his ninjas and listen
Speaker 12: to the ocelly dot com Radio Network.
Speaker 13: I agree it's straight to the point, straight talk, and
Speaker 13: I like that idea.
Speaker 3: Olly dot com revelation through conversation.
Speaker 14: Conversation did use express my caller stools there anyone else
Speaker 14: who happens to get on the air to Jelly dot com.
Speaker 14: Do not necessarily reflect reviews little Lly dot com or Jolly,
Speaker 14: and we are not responsible for getting stupidity which might ensue.
Speaker 4: Thank you
Speaker 12: Episode you w