Speaker 1: Can you dig ats? Dig it you digs.
Speaker 2: Ladies, gentlemen, friends, pos, lurkers, regulars, GMO people, organic.
Speaker 1: People, the room in battles? Why to?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 1: Good evening everyone, and welcome back to the boiler room tonight.
Speaker 1: We ask a very uncomfortable question, what happens when the
Speaker 1: people who promise to destroy the system become its latest caretakers.
Speaker 1: Because a lot of Americans were sold a very specific
Speaker 1: version of the future, not all that long ago. No
Speaker 1: more endless wars a war with Iran, no more political weaponization,
Speaker 1: no more corruption hidden behind intelligence agencies and sealed files.
Speaker 1: A more economic sabotage, the more collapsing of your purchasing power,
Speaker 1: the more betrayal of the working and middle classes. People
Speaker 1: were promised transparency, accountability, a healthy economy, cheap fuel, of course,
Speaker 1: correction if you will yet here we are still staring
Speaker 1: at heavily redacted documents, Still watching geopolitical escalations spread across
Speaker 1: multiple fronts, Still watching the machinery of censorship, narrative management,
Speaker 1: and selective prosecution grinded forward. We're still watching inflation hollow
Speaker 1: out ordinary life while the financial system grows more and
Speaker 1: more unstable by the month mark Anderson is not going
Speaker 1: to be with us tonight because he's traveling. He told
Speaker 1: me it costs seventy eight bucks to fill up his truck.
Speaker 1: Are you kidding me? I had to pay five dollars
Speaker 1: a gallon for ninety three here in Texas. Ouch, my
Speaker 1: car requires ninety three. Okay, so it's not negotiable five
Speaker 1: dollars a gallon in Texas? What are my homies in
Speaker 1: California paying? And now suddenly the establishment wants to talk
Speaker 1: about aliens, bro UFOs, UAPs, interdimensional speculation portals, religious reinterpretations
Speaker 1: of disclosure right on queue. At the exact moment, people
Speaker 1: are beginning to seriously question the direction of the economy,
Speaker 1: the future of the dollar, the possibility of energy shocks.
Speaker 1: What's gonna happen when all these data centers go up?
Speaker 1: What's that going to do to our water prices, our
Speaker 1: energy prices? Is there gonna be a low frequency hum
Speaker 1: next to my house? Am I going to be able
Speaker 1: to sleep? Is my tune of sandwich going to be
Speaker 1: twenty five dollars? Are Americans right? We're thinking about whether
Speaker 1: Americans could soon be staring down catastrophic fuel prices and
Speaker 1: another engineered era of austerity. And when I say catastrophic
Speaker 1: fuel prices, you can find the clip of Trump saying, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe they'll go up to three hundred dollars
Speaker 1: a barrel. Our economists have never even mapped out what
Speaker 1: would happen from what I hear if it was that expensive,
Speaker 1: Because if fuel explodes to two hundred two fifty three
Speaker 1: hundred dollars a barrel, globally, it looks like everything changes.
Speaker 1: Food changes, transportation changes, employment changes, and that all equates
Speaker 1: to your daily life changing. And history tells us that
Speaker 1: moments of economic instability are often accompanied by something else,
Speaker 1: like massive psychological operations, distractions, spectacles, emotional diversions, new mythologies
Speaker 1: for the public to consume while institutional trust collapses. Maybe
Speaker 1: that's the bigger story tonight, Not whether UFOs are real,
Speaker 1: not whether corruption exists and where, not whether governments manipulate perception,
Speaker 1: but whether modern politics itself has become a perpetual cycle
Speaker 1: of promises, disappointments, controlled outrage, and carefully timed narrative pivots
Speaker 1: designed to keep populations emotionally disoriented while larger systems transform
Speaker 1: around them. Tonight, we're here in the boiler room once
Speaker 1: again to examine the cracks in the narrative containment structure itself.
Speaker 1: This is boiler Room. I'm Brian McLain, broadcasting live out
Speaker 1: of Central Texas. My call sign is Hesher here in
Speaker 1: the boiler room, and we have a narrative containment breach tonight.
Speaker 1: That's right. This is the narrative containment breach episode of
Speaker 1: boiler Room broadcasting live this May the eighth, twenty six.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna bring up Mystical Pharaoh aboard the starship boiler Room. Here.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have UFO puns tonight. I guess mystical Pharaoh.
Speaker 1: What's up? Man? They live? That's right, they do. Welcome
Speaker 1: back to the boiler Room. How you doing, dude.
Speaker 4: This is not a drill. This is a live broadcast.
Speaker 4: The signal is coming.
Speaker 1: Yes, the signal and a lot of noise, noise and
Speaker 1: signal inbound.
Speaker 4: Man are you man?
Speaker 1: I'm great, Happy Friday. I'm glad to be here with you,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad we're here in the boiler room. That
Speaker 1: much I can tell you.
Speaker 4: Same here man, looking forward to get into it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, me too. Our website is Alternate Current Radio
Speaker 1: dot com. If you're new around here and you haven't
Speaker 1: checked it out, please go check it out Alternate Current
Speaker 1: Radio dot com. That's where you find all the ACR
Speaker 1: goods over there. I'll put it up on screen for you,
Speaker 1: and of course you can follow me at X at
Speaker 1: hesher Media. I'd give you pharaohs, but Pharaoh has uh
Speaker 1: pulled the eject ripcord over at X. He's out of there.
Speaker 1: And I don't blame him either, man. It's just getting
Speaker 1: grimmer and grimmer on X.
Speaker 4: I'm sure I'm actually have been really much happier this way.
Speaker 1: Yeah. S Born and I were talking about that this
Speaker 1: morning and yesterday morning she's putting the doom scroll up
Speaker 1: and it was just like, oh, this is just not
Speaker 1: fun anymore. It's not fun at all. It's trash track AI.
Speaker 4: Crap or paid like Trump influencers or some people on
Speaker 4: the other side. They just retarded.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's a little uh. This is really where
Speaker 1: we're gonna end up with all these innovations. Huh okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: well all right, let's bring the Rugus among us onto
Speaker 1: the stage. Here there is a ruckus among us, and
Speaker 1: there he is right there. What's up, rugus?
Speaker 5: Howdy howdy, howdy Wow, what a week? Uh yeah, holy molly,
Speaker 5: let me tell you kids. Okay, okay, okay, we got
Speaker 5: government disclosure for aliens. Okay. First of all, government is bad. Okay,
Speaker 5: don't do government. Okay. UFOs are bad. Don't do UFOs.
Speaker 5: Aliens are bad. Okay, Yeah, you get the idea. Oh
Speaker 5: a crackle pop, I hit the wrong button. The aliens
Speaker 5: made me do it. Holy moly, wow, this is this
Speaker 5: is gonna be quite the episode. It's a shame it's
Speaker 5: just the three of us, because holy moly, hello to
Speaker 5: all of the viewers. I saw media bear by the way,
Speaker 5: so shout out to doctor Clown and Karen and everybody
Speaker 5: creative accidents, Johnny Leech, Silvertail, et cetera, et cetera. Thank
Speaker 5: you guys. While you're in there, make sure you hit
Speaker 5: that button and share this show. There may be only
Speaker 5: three of us, but there's way more than three of you.
Speaker 5: And yeah, so you know what to do and Hesher.
Speaker 5: Thank you for having me and mystical Pharaoh, you and
Speaker 5: your lovely ladies, Thank you for joining us. I love
Speaker 5: that outfit we got going on the one tonight. That's fantastic.
Speaker 5: This is great. Ready, let's just do it. Let's do it.
Speaker 5: What you got?
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, all right, let's get into it. Let's see
Speaker 1: here tonight. We're gonna break the eyes. It's a video
Speaker 1: that my friend Britt showed me today. Shout out to Britt,
Speaker 1: and I was just like, what am I looking at?
Speaker 1: So I figured I would bring it here into the
Speaker 1: boiler room and share it with you, gentlemen, and you
Speaker 1: find folks viewing to and listening tonight. I'm gonna start
Speaker 1: with just the video aspect that I was shown, and
Speaker 1: then we can talk about, you know, what it actually is,
Speaker 1: what does it mean? What did we just watch? So
Speaker 1: here you go. This is inside New York City's newest exhibit,
Speaker 1: the Trump Epstein Reading Room.
Speaker 6: This is what it looks like to have all of
Speaker 6: the released Epstein files in one place, more than three
Speaker 6: point five million pages printed and bound into books inside
Speaker 6: the Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Reading Room.
Speaker 7: DFJ didn't follow the law right. They failed to redact
Speaker 7: names and identifying information of survivors and victims, and they
Speaker 7: did redact names of co conspirators. So each of these
Speaker 7: is about five pounds if you take all you know,
Speaker 7: four hundred and thirty seven volumes. It weighs about seventeen
Speaker 7: thousand pounds. So if we read for twenty four hours
Speaker 7: and we covered two pages a minute, we will read
Speaker 7: about three of these books. This much, this, and this,
Speaker 7: that's twenty four hours of reading. So in order to
Speaker 7: get through all of these books, we would need to
Speaker 7: read for more than a year. What we wanted to
Speaker 7: do in the middle of all of this evidence of
Speaker 7: crimes provide a way for us to think about and
Speaker 7: center the victims. We have one four hundred points of light,
Speaker 7: one to represent each one of the victims survivors. We
Speaker 7: put together these three timelines. The Jeffrey Epstein timeline across
Speaker 7: the top, which are all of his allegations, the Donald
Speaker 7: Trump timeline along the bottom, which are all of his
Speaker 7: allegations and crimes. In the middle all of the times
Speaker 7: that they were together. I think what you see here
Speaker 7: is that these two men lived remarkably similar lives, which
Speaker 7: makes sense because they were friends for decades. The difference
Speaker 7: is one of them died in prison and the other
Speaker 7: one is the president.
Speaker 4: Of the United States.
Speaker 1: What we hope for and what we hope.
Speaker 7: To advocate for, is to have not only all of
Speaker 7: the files released, but also to have them properly redacted
Speaker 7: so that it doesn't expose the names of victims or survivors,
Speaker 7: and also unredact the names of witnesses and perpetrator and
Speaker 7: co conspirators so that there is true transparency and that
Speaker 7: can promote real accountability.
Speaker 1: This real accountability, that's what we was promised right in
Speaker 1: the election cycle.
Speaker 4: Right, So does it have like lys Weasner name there
Speaker 4: and these other guys or just Trump?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean the way he said the co conspirators
Speaker 1: to me means a lot of people have been blacked
Speaker 1: out and redacted, right. And I also recall what was
Speaker 1: that months ago, early on in uh Trump forty seven
Speaker 1: a year ago, we had Pam Blondie telling us that
Speaker 1: and other people in government saying that they had multiple
Speaker 1: field offices pulling extra hours to redact those files. And
Speaker 1: as mister Greg in that clip points out there, they
Speaker 1: failed to properly redact some of the victim's names, but
Speaker 1: they certainly spent a lot of time redacting large swaths
Speaker 1: of this. And if this is truly everything that has
Speaker 1: been you know, released, it's missing a couple years worth
Speaker 1: of stuff too, So it would be even bigger if
Speaker 1: it was fully released. So to me, that indicates they're
Speaker 1: probably still working on redacting sections of it, and it
Speaker 1: makes me wonder what's in those sections? What were these
Speaker 1: people up to during those years? But immediately, like I
Speaker 1: looked at this and I thought it was you know,
Speaker 1: I was like, is this something official? Did the government
Speaker 1: put this out? Like you have to? You know what
Speaker 1: I mean? Like when when I first saw it, I
Speaker 1: wasn't really paying one hundred percent attention to it. I
Speaker 1: was my mind was a little bit split. But then
Speaker 1: I got home and I looked at it and I
Speaker 1: was like, oh, okay, this is like a pop up
Speaker 1: art slash activism installation. Clearly Greg does not represent represent
Speaker 1: the government. The government would like you thinking about little
Speaker 1: Green Men right now instead of just what the volume
Speaker 1: of the Epstein files looks like. I mean, three thousand.
Speaker 1: It's over three thousand and four hundred of those books
Speaker 1: that are that long, And it would take you a
Speaker 1: year to read the entire thing if you were reading
Speaker 1: twenty four hours and not twenty four hours a day
Speaker 1: and not stopping to look stuff up and cross reference stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's pretty crazy.
Speaker 5: Don't don't I don't want to shoot holes in that
Speaker 5: theory there, mister what was his name? Greg?
Speaker 1: Mister Greg.
Speaker 5: But some people read at different speeds than other people.
Speaker 5: So yeah, let's not forget what. It might take one
Speaker 5: person a year, but it might take another person maybe
Speaker 5: three months.
Speaker 1: Well then yeah, it.
Speaker 5: Might take another person like three to five years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's mister Garrett. I'm just really kidding a sorry,
Speaker 1: mister Garrett. It's mister David Garrett. He's the organizer. There's
Speaker 1: no great I'm kidding.
Speaker 5: Man. Okay, Well, what his problem is? Hesher? I mean,
Speaker 5: this seems nice and clean and cool, above board, but
Speaker 5: obviously this gentleman has a severe I mean severe case
Speaker 5: of TDS. Yes, and it has manifested itself the likes
Speaker 5: of which we have not seen yet. I mean, the
Speaker 5: guy literally printed how many thousands of books? I totally
Speaker 5: already forgot the number.
Speaker 1: Like over three four hundred.
Speaker 5: Oh well, actually I guess I can. I probably own
Speaker 5: that many books myself, probably not even kidding, but they
Speaker 5: don't weigh as much as this one. I'm just kidding.
Speaker 5: What is this? What do you need? Kids? What do
Speaker 5: you think is gonna happened to this display? Once somebody
Speaker 5: who's died in the wool and like, I mean, they
Speaker 5: didn't go buy the maga hat, they were born with
Speaker 5: the maga hat. Sees this kind of thing and they're
Speaker 5: just a little mildly pissed off or drunk one night.
Speaker 5: This is a target for that type of person. I'm
Speaker 5: just saying, so I would not be surprised if we
Speaker 5: hear some stories instances of some vandalism. It could be
Speaker 5: a very dangerous one. I've saw some videos of this
Speaker 5: wacko who was pissed off at rightfully so, about the
Speaker 5: participation of one paper product company's involvement with the stuff
Speaker 5: happening in the other side of the world, in the
Speaker 5: Middle East and all that stuff. So he's like, almost
Speaker 5: that's place on fires. He lights the rolls of toilet
Speaker 5: paper on fire. But you got these books right there
Speaker 5: with all these pages, right next to all those thousands
Speaker 5: something candles, and I'm just like, this is a recipe
Speaker 5: for disaster people. Also speaking of the candles, which are
Speaker 5: of course emitting some sort of carbon dioxide and killing
Speaker 5: the planet. How many trees, mister, did you chop down
Speaker 5: for your little like your little trump arrangement syndrome? Performative
Speaker 5: art piece here. These people don't think, do they. I'm
Speaker 5: just pointing that out as halfway as a joke. But
Speaker 5: he's probably the type of person who probably would also
Speaker 5: be like, would want to go through this amount of
Speaker 5: effort to bring raise awareness to the climate change issue,
Speaker 5: but not realizing what he's just done here in this
Speaker 5: particular instance.
Speaker 1: Right perhaps perhaps, But I will say this, whatever amount
Speaker 1: of ink and paper he used to create, that is
Speaker 1: nothing compared to what the DoD spends every ten seconds
Speaker 1: of our lives. Those people, they dump all the trash
Speaker 1: from their aircraft carriers and cruisers into the ocean with impunity.
Speaker 1: They create more waste than anything on the planet. Probably.
Speaker 1: I love this comment by car ninety nine nine zero.
Speaker 1: Maybe the aliens are speed readers and they'll save the day.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of thinking we're looking for here, exactly,
Speaker 1: that we're looking for where these things, where the conspiracies collide,
Speaker 1: so that that's great.
Speaker 5: Like Johnny five alive, Johnny five from Short Circuit, You're hired, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: And I don't want to I don't want to beat
Speaker 4: on the the guy I understood, but really, how much
Speaker 4: does he actually care about the issue versus the TDS, right,
Speaker 4: Because again, like I'm no Trump fan and everybody knows that, right,
Speaker 4: and I'm one of his biggest like criticizers. Now, however,
Speaker 4: Trump is not the worst that's in the Epstein files.
Speaker 4: So really, if he really cares about the victims and
Speaker 4: all what he you know, the story he's trying to tell,
Speaker 4: then he should have put the other people right, not
Speaker 4: just make it about Trump. This is I think in
Speaker 4: his head if I'm just you know, making a hypothesis there,
Speaker 4: he just has a severe case of TDS and he's
Speaker 4: just using Epstein to tye it with Trump and as
Speaker 4: a way to basically just taint them, right, I think
Speaker 4: I think that's that's what it feels like to me,
Speaker 4: not someone that actually cares about the thing.
Speaker 1: Maybe, man, maybe I don't know. I don't know anything
Speaker 1: about David Garrett, so I don't want to pass judgment.
Speaker 1: And you know he did, yes a centerpiece, there was
Speaker 1: the Trump Epstein timeline, and and yes he did print
Speaker 1: this all out and it's it's a huge thing, right,
Speaker 1: Like there was money that went into this. I'm sure
Speaker 1: there's a there's a whole team at that. You know,
Speaker 1: I forget the name of it, but the group that
Speaker 1: put this on. But at the same time, you know,
Speaker 1: to his credit he said the Coken spiras and unfortunately
Speaker 1: for TikTok brain, that's about the only term, one of
Speaker 1: the only terms you could use to like talk about
Speaker 1: the friends of Jeffrey network, right, and then like just
Speaker 1: seeing the visual like the sheer weight, you know, mass
Speaker 1: of all that stuff. I think there's value to that,
Speaker 1: you know, I think there's value there, Like could he
Speaker 1: have gone deeper?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: But do we need him to? Maybe not? You know,
Speaker 1: maybe this is just more for the TikTok brains sort
Speaker 1: of people that need a visual to to sort of
Speaker 1: cement context around something. I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I take you guys' point. I'm as black
Speaker 1: pilled as you are, and I have my thoughts as well.
Speaker 1: But it's like, at the same time, like at least
Speaker 1: he's got a point of light for all the victims,
Speaker 1: hopefully they're little LEDs and not something that's gassing the
Speaker 1: ozone layer on Ruckus behind.
Speaker 5: He's certainly doing more than the DOJ so we'll get.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, yeah, by a long shot. In fact, with
Speaker 1: the deal Jay did, was they took our tax dollars
Speaker 1: and they used it to redact all those co conspirators.
Speaker 1: You know, that's one of his main points there, and
Speaker 1: so you know, thus it's really the DOJ's fault, the
Speaker 1: administration's fault, the court's fault, that that there's so much
Speaker 1: ink on all these pieces of paper, because if it
Speaker 1: was just typed letters, it would be way less ink
Speaker 1: than black bars across everything.
Speaker 5: True, but how many times did they have to stop
Speaker 5: the printing and change the ink country?
Speaker 1: I was just thinking, you're reading my mind. I was
Speaker 1: just thinking, like, who printed this and then bound it all?
Speaker 5: My goodness, I can't make it through like ten pages
Speaker 5: before it's like you're out of ink. You're out of ink.
Speaker 1: I'll just look at that wall and I'm like, TLDR
Speaker 1: too long, didn't read. I mean, I know the punchline already.
Speaker 5: And I just saw an article. I may have shared
Speaker 5: it in one of our discord chats or something about
Speaker 5: this lady was doing a TikTok thing, I think, saying like,
Speaker 5: oh my god, I bought a printer and I bought ink,
Speaker 5: and now the printer wants to charge me a charge
Speaker 5: just to use my printer.
Speaker 1: Yep, HP printers Uh, not sponsored or anything. I'm in
Speaker 1: total like printers are I think one of the stupidest
Speaker 1: scams on the the it planet. However, these new Epsen
Speaker 1: printers that have this, like the different kind of refillable
Speaker 1: liquid compared to the old ones with the cartridges. HP uh,
Speaker 1: from all appearances is trying to like charge people membership
Speaker 1: fees and all this crazy stuff to get their printers.
Speaker 1: Uh you know, re inked. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 5: Yeah, back to the old school way. Kids go to
Speaker 5: your local library and pay one cent per copy the
Speaker 5: print or whatever it is.
Speaker 1: I want to get a dot matrix printer off of
Speaker 1: like eBay or something. Those things never die.
Speaker 5: Heck yeah, those things.
Speaker 1: Were so cool.
Speaker 5: They were annoying.
Speaker 1: Now yeah, it takes a long time to print along
Speaker 1: document too. Uh yeah, a little bit loud for people
Speaker 1: that have microphones in their homes. But man, yeah, So anyway,
Speaker 1: for anyone that wants to look into it more, we've
Speaker 1: got will link this on the show page. The Epstein
Speaker 1: documents are no longer front page news kenon Art installation
Speaker 1: change that. Uh, we'll throw that up there. I do
Speaker 1: think that the title of.
Speaker 5: The Hard To compete with all of this, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right. I love the title of it though, The
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Reading Room. It's
Speaker 1: pretty clever.
Speaker 5: But you know they're holding hands skipping and did you
Speaker 5: see that?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, over over Capitol Hill. Oh man, good stuff,
Speaker 1: good stuff.
Speaker 5: It would be like Elmo's World, but la Epstein's world.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's perfect. Perfect. I find it a little strange
Speaker 1: that you have to make an appointment to go in there. Also,
Speaker 1: that's a little bit strange, But I mean it's so
Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe it would just be a line
Speaker 1: around there, a line around the corner. Do we have
Speaker 1: to are we charging to get in there? How does
Speaker 1: this work?
Speaker 5: You got to go through a lengthy interview process?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, thanks creative accidents. Let me just throw this
Speaker 1: on the screen too, because this is something I was
Speaker 1: thinking about earlier and I almost forgot to mention it.
Speaker 1: How do I do that? I have to do something
Speaker 1: snazzy here to put this on the screen. I go
Speaker 1: like this, that, my friends, is what we were originally told.
Speaker 1: The size, format, weight, and importance of the Epstein Files
Speaker 1: was right there on the screen right now. If you're
Speaker 1: not watching you're just listening. We've got all the paid
Speaker 1: shill blue check mark people from X. We've got d
Speaker 1: see drain. Oh, we've got Liz Wheeler. We've got libs
Speaker 1: of TikTok and three other accounts standing there holding up.
Speaker 1: This is what a year ago their original little binders. Right,
Speaker 1: it looks like your binder from high school biology, does
Speaker 1: it not? It looks just like my high school biology binder.
Speaker 1: It's right about the same size, just a little bigger
Speaker 1: than a trapper keeper. Where's my trapper keeper? People dropped
Speaker 1: me a book emoji somewhere. What a joke, man, We knew.
Speaker 1: We called that out as a joke the second that happened.
Speaker 1: And now look at like this guy has at least
Speaker 1: vindicated us on that. We were like, oh, yeah, your
Speaker 1: a little trapper keeper there full of fucking Epstein files.
Speaker 1: Yeah right.
Speaker 5: It's like you know, and like there's these these apps
Speaker 5: for your your devices, like a Facebook or a TikTok,
Speaker 5: and it's really weighty and bloated and it takes up
Speaker 5: like a huge amount of space and slows down your phone.
Speaker 5: And then they released like the light version, like TikTok lights,
Speaker 5: Facebook Lights, and they usually play with the word light.
Speaker 5: But as l I t e. Right, you know exactly
Speaker 5: what I'm talking about. It's a significantly slim down and
Speaker 5: you know it claims to have the exact same robust features,
Speaker 5: but you just know, you just know. So that's what
Speaker 5: we're dealing with here hasher? Or it could be like
Speaker 5: we could use this as like one of those like
Speaker 5: before and after pictures for some sort of weight loss
Speaker 5: program or something.
Speaker 1: Right the it's like the Epstein files on GLP one.
Speaker 5: This is ocempic face. This is what the Epstein files
Speaker 5: look like with those epic face.
Speaker 1: This is the Epstein files. This is the Epstein files
Speaker 1: on ozempic face. Right here we go. This is the
Speaker 1: actual Epstein files. And here's the Epstein files on ozempic face.
Speaker 1: You gotta love that. Oh man, So Aliens, Bros, Aliens.
Speaker 5: I heard something about this.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I actually haven't got up with that's Can someone
Speaker 4: just give us an overview?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Absolutely, short short version, Yeah, go for it. Aliens are
Speaker 5: so real, bro. Now how about this. I will do
Speaker 5: I will do you the honor of sharing what the
Speaker 5: president of the most powerful and greatest country ever on
Speaker 5: earth said. As for my promise, to you. The Department
Speaker 5: of War, that's right, has released the first tranch of
Speaker 5: the UFO slash UAP files to the public for their
Speaker 5: review and study. In an effort for complete and maximum transparency.
Speaker 5: It was my honor to direct my administration to identify
Speaker 5: and provide government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life,
Speaker 5: unidentified aerial phenomena, phenomena, and identified flying objects. Whereas previous
Speaker 5: administrations have failed to be transparent on this subject, with
Speaker 5: these new documents and videos that people can decide for themselves.
Speaker 5: Quote what the hell is going on? All caps end?
Speaker 5: Quote have fun and enjoy President to all caps, Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, and this was this was alongside the announcement
Speaker 5: of the Well, they had already opened up the UFO
Speaker 5: dot gov website, but there wasn't much going on. So
Speaker 5: now they released the first batch or whatever. So this
Speaker 5: this is this is the online UFO files version of
Speaker 5: the ozentfic face Epstein files picture that we were just
Speaker 5: talking about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there you go. And then Pharaoh, just to pile
Speaker 1: on a little bit after uh, your thanks for your
Speaker 1: attention to this matter. We had Pete Hegseth way in
Speaker 1: also the Department of war cleared for release. The Department
Speaker 1: of War is in lockstep with President Trump to bring
Speaker 1: unprecedented transparency regarding our government's understanding of unidentified anomaloust phenomena.
Speaker 1: These files, hidden behind classifications have long fuel justified speculation,
Speaker 1: and it's time the American people see it for themselves.
Speaker 1: The release of declassified documents demonstrates that Trump's administration's earnest
Speaker 1: commitment to unprecedented transparency signed the United States Secretary of
Speaker 1: War P. D. Haig Seth.
Speaker 4: So that's great. So all of us are going to
Speaker 4: be locked at home because we cannot afford gas, and
Speaker 4: we will learn about UFOs. Yeah, that's what you are
Speaker 4: distracting us with right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah maybe maybe maybe they're maybe the amount of crap
Speaker 1: they're going to release is going to be the same size,
Speaker 1: the same metric, the same number of metrics shit tons
Speaker 1: as the Epstein files, and we can been the next
Speaker 1: I don't know, five years going through them while we
Speaker 1: experienced World War III, the decline of the US dollar,
Speaker 1: and a complete collapse of society because of tech bros.
Speaker 4: Can I just make a prediction, nobody's gonna give a shit, dude.
Speaker 4: People right now are just just so consumed. Was no
Speaker 4: one just.
Speaker 1: A ship dude. And the people that do give a
Speaker 1: shit are like looking for something, some cotton candy for
Speaker 1: the brain right now, something to latch onto, you know.
Speaker 1: And I'm sorry, if you're out there and you're a
Speaker 1: ufologist that watches this show, you probably don't because there's
Speaker 1: so much other crap you could be watching. But you know,
Speaker 1: like I mean, I had I had an uncle rest
Speaker 1: his soul, who was a ufologist. He loved that stuff,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. He would hang out on
Speaker 1: like the the bluffs in Arizona with like night vision
Speaker 1: goggles and you know, like he loved that shit. And
Speaker 1: I loved him. You know, he was a great dude,
Speaker 1: and like I appreciated that he had a hobby that
Speaker 1: he was into, and you know what I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't judge him for it. But at the same time,
Speaker 1: it's like I'm someone that you know, read Bill Cooper's book,
Speaker 1: and someone that watched Mirage Men, and someone that's watched
Speaker 1: X Files, and someone that was obsessed with you know,
Speaker 1: UFOs and aliens as a kid and all that stuff.
Speaker 1: And like the older I got, the more and the
Speaker 1: more I learned about psychological operations and Project Bluebeam and
Speaker 1: all this other stuff attached to it. I had to
Speaker 1: let it go, you know. And I think a lot
Speaker 1: of you out there are probably the same way. It's like,
Speaker 1: all right, I might believe in UH, an off world entity,
Speaker 1: like if I met one, but I'm certainly not going
Speaker 1: to let the media or a government change my mind
Speaker 1: about how I feel about it. And I've said this
Speaker 1: on the show before. I'm so freaking skeptical about it.
Speaker 1: At this point, I was the guy that wanted to
Speaker 1: be picked up. I was like, abduct me, don't probe me, please,
Speaker 1: but take me for a ride. I want to check
Speaker 1: it out, you know. And and now it's just like
Speaker 1: I could meet a tiny green homunculus and I would
Speaker 1: accuse it of being cooked up in a You in
Speaker 1: a in a government lab. You know. That's the first
Speaker 1: conversation I would have with the alien. Prove to me
Speaker 1: that you're not cooked up in a government lab. This
Speaker 1: is where I'm at.
Speaker 5: I have so many thoughts about this, but I'm tell
Speaker 5: I'd rather let mystical pharaoh. Did you have some more
Speaker 5: to say about? Where where are you?
Speaker 4: I want to.
Speaker 5: And I'm just again and I have so many thoughts,
Speaker 5: but I'm just gonna tease it.
Speaker 1: You gotta go, man, go for a.
Speaker 5: Couple, hit a couple that are just sticking. Like, like,
Speaker 5: the number one obvious one that everybody's missing already is
Speaker 5: it's the Department of War that is in charge of
Speaker 5: this disclosure. That should bring alarm bells for everybody right there.
Speaker 5: If you take any of this with a grain of salt,
Speaker 5: you'd be like, well, hold on a second, are we
Speaker 5: planning to be fighting these things or something?
Speaker 1: What generation of warfare are we in right now? It's
Speaker 1: not the first or the second.
Speaker 5: Yeah, So I'm like, well, there's always that, And we
Speaker 5: do understand that, you know, as far as the terrestrial
Speaker 5: geopolitical tensions, are we moving towards a new specialty of
Speaker 5: exopolitics or something? Anyways that that they like war? The
Speaker 5: military industrial compact plex absolutely thrives on this stuff. So
Speaker 5: I mean, we're we're already entronched in all of this garbage.
Speaker 5: We got going to hear it on you know, between ourselves.
Speaker 5: I don't I don't know how, or let's not do that.
Speaker 5: Let's just just want to point out why is it
Speaker 5: the fing Department of War? So let's be cautious and
Speaker 5: pay attention to that. I guess maybe because it used
Speaker 5: to be called the Department of Defense and these things
Speaker 5: were considered matters of national defense back and you know,
Speaker 5: until recent I don't know, anyways, it's very strange. The
Speaker 5: other thing is that Trump He's all have fun. I'm like,
Speaker 5: wouldn't this type of information be like kind of earth
Speaker 5: shattering news. Isn't this like literally like the most important?
Speaker 5: Like this is this is a pretty big deal kids, right,
Speaker 5: don't you think? And he's like have fun?
Speaker 1: Right, Like what's fun about that?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 1: Are you fucking kidding me? Dude? Have fun? I'm already
Speaker 1: not having fun trying to figure out what the fuck
Speaker 1: is going on with these Epstein files, And you want
Speaker 1: me to have fun with the X files. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I already watched all the X files like decades ago,
Speaker 1: and I already know I haven't looked at any of
Speaker 1: the contents yet, but I can garon fucking to you this.
Speaker 1: It's gonna have a whole but it's gonna have all
Speaker 1: the crap. It's gonna have all the crap. And that's
Speaker 1: what the have fun equals have fun. Trying to separate
Speaker 1: the bullshit from anything that's actually factual in all of this.
Speaker 4: Yeah no, actually Trump was hate him, but he he
Speaker 4: actually usually say the what's what's in his mind? Right,
Speaker 4: just blurb and with him saying have fun, that tell
Speaker 4: you it is bullshit. It is just entertainment, and his
Speaker 4: mind is just entertainment. That's why he said have fun.
Speaker 1: That's what entertainment's for, right, have a little bit of fun. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: disconnect from reality, like what your grocery said. It's like
Speaker 1: throwing your dog a stick and saying, go fetch. That's
Speaker 1: fucking right, dude, It's it's stroking the head of the dog,
Speaker 1: right whatever. People are still paying attention to this retarded
Speaker 1: geriatric idiot.
Speaker 5: Can I point out the other obvious thing?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Please?
Speaker 5: And and another thing that I have yet to see
Speaker 5: anybody mentioned. So here we go. In general, other than
Speaker 5: whatever you call this group of type of people who
Speaker 5: enjoy this content right here, which is a very very
Speaker 5: small group of people, let me tell you, usually the
Speaker 5: type of people who quote unquote distrust government. For most
Speaker 5: of my lifetime have been the people who believe wholeheartedly
Speaker 5: in UFOs and this idea that the government is covering
Speaker 5: everything up and now the government is handing it to
Speaker 5: you on a silver platter and you're gobbling it up, like,
Speaker 5: wait a minute, hold on a second, are you the
Speaker 5: same person? Who are you? What is going on here? Like?
Speaker 5: It's just like what like what is happening helped me here?
Speaker 1: After and exactly? And this is after you've just been
Speaker 1: lied to about everything else that I mentioned in the
Speaker 1: opening of the show, like you'd literally if you voted
Speaker 1: for him, you literally we're buying a certain platform, and
Speaker 1: you've gotten the opposite of everything on the platform, unless
Speaker 1: maybe you're a single issue voter in your two way
Speaker 1: you know, I get it, okay, I get it. That
Speaker 1: one's going on apparently a little bit okay, But for
Speaker 1: another time, everything else, the big things, the geopolitical things,
Speaker 1: the day to day, the putting. You know, what is
Speaker 1: my time effort? What is my life worth in fiat dollars?
Speaker 1: I'm trying to wrangle out of the matrix. That's sad.
Speaker 1: That's sad. And now you want to you want you
Speaker 1: expect the public to thank you. You lied to them
Speaker 1: about the most fundamentals, right, their tune of sandwiches and
Speaker 1: their gas, and they're no more wars, and they're no
Speaker 1: more protecting uh, harmful rings of people, criminals, corruption, none
Speaker 1: of that that those people will actually be protected. And
Speaker 1: but here's some UFO slop.
Speaker 5: And I glossed over. I mean, I'm sure most of
Speaker 5: you out there watching are listening to this understand what
Speaker 5: I'm what I mean when I say this is earth
Speaker 5: shattering news. It could have huge impacts on everything, politics, governments, religion,
Speaker 5: the economy, all sorts of fun stuff. Science. Maybe they
Speaker 5: got some sort of life extension technologies. So many, so
Speaker 5: many questions, so many things, and for us to be
Speaker 5: so conchalant about it and be like hell fun, like
Speaker 5: you know, exotic energy possibilities that Yet all of these things,
Speaker 5: these tensions, and these problems are what make the broken
Speaker 5: system that is in existence currently go round. And I
Speaker 5: don't believe for a second that the powers that be
Speaker 5: the power structure are going to willingly be part of
Speaker 5: the change. That that level of changing the system, I mean,
Speaker 5: that's that's that's not like a slow change, that's like
Speaker 5: a rug poll. What I think is really going on
Speaker 5: here is I think y'all know me, I'm a little
Speaker 5: bit of a spiritual kind of guy, So I've always
Speaker 5: been concerned about this from the lens of what this
Speaker 5: means on the religious and the spiritual side. I'm not
Speaker 5: going to get too much into that on this program.
Speaker 5: I'm actually working on some of my own long form content,
Speaker 5: maybe a special episode of The Daily Ruckus. We'll see
Speaker 5: whatever it's going to be. On the subject about people,
Speaker 5: you already hear people talking about, Oh, these aliens are
Speaker 5: really demons. Oh this is the part of the Bible
Speaker 5: where it says a great deception or whatever. And I
Speaker 5: think maybe part of it, this is the great deception,
Speaker 5: is the deception itself. That sounds a little meta, but
Speaker 5: I know what that means in my head. Maybe it
Speaker 5: does in your head. But what I do want to
Speaker 5: point out is that I was just telling Sam Cheney
Speaker 5: this the other night. It was an idea I already
Speaker 5: had when I first heard some of the rumblings of
Speaker 5: all this UFO stuff, and I was like, if the
Speaker 5: government was really going to do this, I already had
Speaker 5: this feeling it was going to be exactly like this,
Speaker 5: that they were just going to release some files, just
Speaker 5: gonna be a little slow drip thing, just here you go.
Speaker 5: And then and I think I may even said they
Speaker 5: were just gonna give it to you and say have fun,
Speaker 5: and he literally gave it to everybody and said had fun.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 5: But why they're doing that is remember that that science
Speaker 5: fiction story written I believe it was written by Arthur C. Clark,
Speaker 5: correct me if I'm wrong. And they did do like
Speaker 5: a Netflix or made for Science Sci Fi Channel movie
Speaker 5: Childhood's End, where the UFOs the motherships arrive up in
Speaker 5: the sky across like every major city on the planet
Speaker 5: and then they just stay there for like a generation.
Speaker 5: They don't do anything, They're just there and everybody just
Speaker 5: gets used to it, but especially the kids who were
Speaker 5: raised in that environment and now they and then when
Speaker 5: they learn about the aliens and they meet the aliens,
Speaker 5: it turns out, of course in the story that the
Speaker 5: aliens for some straight reason, look exactly like a devil
Speaker 5: creature with the horns and red skin and the tail,
Speaker 5: and I don't think they have a pitchfork. But you
Speaker 5: get the idea very disturbing, disturbing story. That's the one,
Speaker 5: and I'm just like, that's what it would be really
Speaker 5: more about. They really just kind of want to kind
Speaker 5: of like what happened six years ago with that emergency.
Speaker 5: Is that all of the response to that and the
Speaker 5: existence of these things, those invisible enemies you see some
Speaker 5: of them floating there and the images here, you know
Speaker 5: what I'm talking about. I'm not sure if we can
Speaker 5: say that word still, Like, I just I don't know.
Speaker 5: Is a lot of this just to get everybody properly propagandized?
Speaker 5: Like is this the ancient aliens that we've been seeing
Speaker 5: on the History Channel? Did it just go live? Is
Speaker 5: that why it was on the History Channel all along?
Speaker 5: Did they have the foregnoledge they knew that this was
Speaker 5: going to become reality? Should I be selling all my
Speaker 5: classic UFO books as if they were textbooks for your
Speaker 5: new history class for your kids in the future. Parents,
Speaker 5: What do you think? What's that going to be?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 5: You know? So, I don't know, and I'm very skeptical
Speaker 5: of all it because at the end of the day,
Speaker 5: the only purpose that could serve the powers that be
Speaker 5: governments and all of that is to try to destroy
Speaker 5: the notion of God in people's minds. And I think
Speaker 5: that's where a lot of this really is leaning towards.
Speaker 5: But that's my own personal opinion.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, we've got this this is gonna sound
Speaker 1: weird maybe, but probably not, you know, dovetailing off what
Speaker 1: you just said. We're already being given predictive programming about
Speaker 1: AIS wanting to achieve some sort of godliness or creating
Speaker 1: their own religion or deciding their Buddhist or you know,
Speaker 1: all this. Everything I just said is you can find
Speaker 1: a headline attached to it, and a story attached to it,
Speaker 1: a narrative attached to it. That's all out there right now.
Speaker 1: So we've got multiple vectors right sort of chipping away
Speaker 1: at traditional organized religion, right Like, I won't even pick one.
Speaker 1: I'll just say all the traditional ones that we have
Speaker 1: right now. We've got AI God, We've got pan Spermia
Speaker 1: Alien God, and then we've got whatever the rainbow is
Speaker 1: between those two. Right Like, all the cult leaders right
Speaker 1: now are going talking to chat GPT, going how do
Speaker 1: I create a new you know, alien cult? How do
Speaker 1: I create an alien AI hybrid cult? Don't do this.
Speaker 1: If you're watching that and that sounded cool, don't do
Speaker 1: it because the AI is already doing it. You're already behind.
Speaker 1: But like this is another vector with which to attack
Speaker 1: institutions and traditions.
Speaker 5: Just put it that way, let's all the horrible things
Speaker 5: governments and people do in the name of God Israel. Hello.
Speaker 1: And then and then look at this one pharaoh, Pharaoh,
Speaker 1: you just posted this one, which is kind of like
Speaker 1: in the direction I was about to go with this anyways.
Speaker 1: But Bank of England must plan for financial crisis sparked
Speaker 1: by aliens. So you know, if you think we're just
Speaker 1: fucking spitball in here when we say this is predictive programming,
Speaker 1: this is setting you up to accept Project Bluebeam, to
Speaker 1: accept you know, the scenario Ronald Reagan teased us about.
Speaker 1: That just goes to say a lot right there, right
Speaker 1: like Ronald Reagan was teasing us about stuff that we're
Speaker 1: gonna see you know, this year or in the next
Speaker 1: four years, and even relating it to world government in
Speaker 1: his own little flowery way. That's noteworthy. But infidel, like
Speaker 1: I mean, mystical pharaoh. Bank of England must plan for
Speaker 1: financial crisis sparked by aliens. Of course it's you know,
Speaker 1: some sort of fucking opinion piece out of the Times,
Speaker 1: dot co, dot you know, slash uk. But at the
Speaker 1: same time, like that's where predict we often see predictive
Speaker 1: programming slipped is in opinion pieces tied to unverifiable current events,
Speaker 1: am I right?
Speaker 4: That's right. So and if you read that, it's stuck
Speaker 4: about oh, it's event of that magnitude or like cause
Speaker 4: civil unrests and crashes in the market, and so on
Speaker 4: that reason why I'm posting it because we are heading
Speaker 4: to a financial collapse or trumpe the triggered the financial collapse, right,
Speaker 4: and I think I think that's that's going to happen.
Speaker 4: So it's interesting they are releasing this and then you
Speaker 4: read that article that was back in January, right, and
Speaker 4: and you talk about predictive programming as you're saying it's
Speaker 4: timing is interesting, I would say, So that's that's my question.
Speaker 4: It's either a distraction, right, or they are expecting some
Speaker 4: madness to happen, some kind of financial collapse because of
Speaker 4: the economical crisis he created, and he's just trying to
Speaker 4: maybe use that as as a way to say that
Speaker 4: this is what caused it.
Speaker 1: Who knows, right, I mean, once you see that idea,
Speaker 1: it gets repeated and a lot of people don't spend
Speaker 1: as much time on a headline, you know what I mean, Like,
Speaker 1: some people watch this and then go, yeah, uh, that
Speaker 1: headline is you know, wonky and doesn't makes sense right now,
Speaker 1: or it's some sort of predictive programming duh. But there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people, probably the majority of people, that
Speaker 1: see that, and it just sort of gets filed, like
Speaker 1: just the headline part gets filed in the back of
Speaker 1: their brain somewhere. They won't even remember where they saw it,
Speaker 1: that it came from a headline. It's just filed in
Speaker 1: a you know, subconscious So there we go. Mystical faraoh.
Speaker 1: He dropped one about how aliens could extra terrestrial or
Speaker 1: interdimensional aliens. You know, we got to be careful about
Speaker 1: we got to be uh, provide the context, right. But
Speaker 1: then this is one that Ruckus sent too, and I'll
Speaker 1: put it on screen and I'll maybe I'll let him
Speaker 1: speak to it. But look, here's another outlet, a tabloidy outlet,
Speaker 1: the dreaded Daily Mail, And here they are UFO revelation.
Speaker 1: Religious leaders told prepare now for UFO Disclosed to unleash
Speaker 1: Bible changing revelations. So, you know, we'll link this on
Speaker 1: the show page. You can read it yourself. If you're
Speaker 1: a you know, theological scholar, you might find value in it.
Speaker 1: And even if you're just a casual reader going wait
Speaker 1: a minute, you might find value in it too, because
Speaker 1: a lot of the things that we talk about are
Speaker 1: you know, deep in the article or associated with other things,
Speaker 1: or we can admit, hey, this article is probably just
Speaker 1: some rank predictive programming. But when you see these sort
Speaker 1: of things timed out like this, and you see that
Speaker 1: there are opinion pieces talking about how alien disclosure could
Speaker 1: disrupt the financial marketplate place and disrupt religion, I don't know,
Speaker 1: you gotta take pause. You got to add that to
Speaker 1: the front part of your cortex instead of just filed
Speaker 1: away in the back.
Speaker 5: Just doing just doing a quick check up bullet point
Speaker 5: level of the timeline here. As far as the thing
Speaker 5: we've discussed, I think it started with the what mister
Speaker 5: farrokohe just brought up And was that last year or
Speaker 5: was that at the beginning of this year?
Speaker 4: This year?
Speaker 5: Yes, it was like right at the beginning of this year,
Speaker 5: That's what I thought. But just before that was the
Speaker 5: cover of the Economist magazine. Is it the Economist magazine?
Speaker 5: That's the one that's got it's always got. The people
Speaker 5: analyzed the cover and it had the world and the
Speaker 5: globe and all this crazy stuff. Well it looks a
Speaker 5: lot like this image behind me, actually enough, but I
Speaker 5: think about it. You guys know what I'm talking about
Speaker 5: was that the New Economist, one of those magazines. Somebody
Speaker 5: in the chat helped me out here, but it doesn't matter.
Speaker 5: So that was first, and in there was a lot
Speaker 5: of you know, some coded stuff that people like, oh,
Speaker 5: aliens and stuff, and then that article and that had
Speaker 5: everybody buzz in for a while about the Bank of
Speaker 5: England thing. And then it was quiet for a while,
Speaker 5: and then at some point not that long ago, but
Speaker 5: it took a little while to where they they just
Speaker 5: came out and just randomly announced, oh, yeah, by the way,
Speaker 5: we're doing this UFO dot gov thing. And I want
Speaker 5: to say that was about a month ago, maybe up
Speaker 5: to two months, I can't remember. It was just yeah,
Speaker 5: and it just was just sat there. I think we
Speaker 5: probably brought it up and we're like, what's up with this?
Speaker 5: And then everybody forgot and then the freaking missing UFO
Speaker 5: scientist's story started building up steam right, which was led
Speaker 5: primarily by ironically enough, to Daily Mail, which I think
Speaker 5: Daily Mail is a very important, useful tool for this
Speaker 5: particular type of propaganda in particular.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So anyway, so we have that and then the big
Speaker 5: news story we heard some rumblings, we saw some people
Speaker 5: talking about, which is why we talked on last week's
Speaker 5: boiler Room about the UFO stuff. Right, Oh, are they
Speaker 5: going to do this or is just some leaking some drops?
Speaker 5: It didn't seem very official last week, but this week
Speaker 5: started out with a bang with that Perry Stone. Is
Speaker 5: that the preacher's name? What's that guy's name, Perry, the
Speaker 5: one that you just showed in that article from the
Speaker 5: Daily Mail. That's the main source of this viral story
Speaker 5: that went all over the place, all over your social
Speaker 5: media fees. You heard the like, oh, the pastors, they're
Speaker 5: they're having meetings and they're being told by these weird
Speaker 5: men in black government people and the know that oh,
Speaker 5: they're going to release the UFO files soon. You got
Speaker 5: to prepare. So that was already going on for like
Speaker 5: up to forty eight hours before Cash Betel comes out
Speaker 5: on shot and handed and he's like, yeah, bro, or
Speaker 5: like releasing the aliens.
Speaker 2: Bro.
Speaker 5: Guy really talks like that. It's pretty crazy, but yeah,
Speaker 5: it's gonna be awesome, Bro. It's could be fun and
Speaker 5: we're like totally doing it, bro, and it's like yeah,
Speaker 5: and the UFOs and you're coming out very soon. In
Speaker 5: all caps, it's how I was reported and then bam
Speaker 5: here we are right, and it's just like so bam bam, bam,
Speaker 5: bam bam. So this is all clearly part of the
Speaker 5: It seems pretty planned to me. Hasher and I, like
Speaker 5: your guys is spitballing over this idea about the economy thing.
Speaker 5: But what happened with the preacher thing very important to
Speaker 5: point out. I know, I said I wasn't going to
Speaker 5: get into the spiritual thing. It's important.
Speaker 1: I mean, the spirituality, religion and finance are two pieces
Speaker 1: of what is supposed to be the you know, long
Speaker 1: polls in the tent of this country.
Speaker 5: I grat I'm just trying not to be preachier, trying
Speaker 5: to tell people what to think or believe, you know,
Speaker 5: I mean, we understand, you know, because a lot of
Speaker 5: the geopolitics right now is being led by the like
Speaker 5: dragged by the hair by Christian scientists, dispensationalism, rapture kind
Speaker 5: of ideology, which is really bizarre when you get into it.
Speaker 5: But I'm not judging anyone for believing that. But that's
Speaker 5: what we've a lot of Christians were raised into this idea,
Speaker 5: so a lot of people are kind of excited about
Speaker 5: this kind of chaos and this idea. Maybe there's an Antichrist?
Speaker 5: Is this is this? It is this the second Coming
Speaker 5: of Jesus. It kind of plays into all of the
Speaker 5: all of the other bizarre stuff that's already been happening
Speaker 5: inside of our government, in particular inside the War Department,
Speaker 5: where we're hearing these bizarre stories about the soldiers are
Speaker 5: being told you're no longer fighting for the country, the
Speaker 5: United States of America, You're fighting as a warrior for
Speaker 5: Jesus Christ. We've all heard in these stories. We know
Speaker 5: what I'm talking about about. And now to throw this
Speaker 5: in here, and now they're going along.
Speaker 4: I have not heard that story.
Speaker 5: Okay, Yeah, okay, Yeah, that's that's that's the thing that's
Speaker 5: been going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's bad, dude, Like some of the I don't
Speaker 1: know if I brought it up on the show because
Speaker 1: I just found it so distasteful and I didn't really
Speaker 1: want to go into a big rant about it. But yeah,
Speaker 1: there's reports coming from soldiers talking about some of their
Speaker 1: commanding officers basically telling them in in large military discussions
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is basically doing the work of Jesus
Speaker 1: and that they are lucky to be in this military
Speaker 1: right now. And like there's whole spiels you can find online,
Speaker 1: like some of the soldiers have released these. They're difficult
Speaker 1: to verify, of course, but there's so many of them
Speaker 1: and even news articles that refer to it that like it.
Speaker 1: It's it seems to a lot of people. I think
Speaker 1: like there is an infection that has been released into
Speaker 1: the US military by commanding off repeating these kind of
Speaker 1: like biblical end time messages into the soldier corps. And
Speaker 1: if anyone out there wants to confirm or deny this,
Speaker 1: you know, I know we have a number of people
Speaker 1: in the military that watch this show, and I know
Speaker 1: it's may not be in your best interest to confirm
Speaker 1: or deny it, but I mean we're interested. Maybe you're
Speaker 1: a family member of someone who has told you that,
Speaker 1: and you can give us a third hand story or
Speaker 1: something like cause I'm seeing a lot of that, and
Speaker 1: it's it's creepy with all the you know, apocalyptic redhefer
Speaker 1: small hat stuff going on at the same time, and this.
Speaker 5: Just kind of adds to that and makes it kind
Speaker 5: of almost worse because you find out it lo and behold.
Speaker 5: It turns out that like JD. Vance is a perfect example.
Speaker 5: I wish I had some examples in front of it,
Speaker 5: but you can do some digging and learn about this.
Speaker 5: Like he's made comments himself. JD. Vance, the sitting Vice
Speaker 5: President of the United States, believes that aliens exist, but
Speaker 5: they're really fallen angels and demons. So the people inside
Speaker 5: this administration, people like Pete Hegseth, believe this. This echoes
Speaker 5: basically some of the weird beliefs of an inner circle
Speaker 5: of people who supposedly allegedly exist. I don't know, probably
Speaker 5: do called the Collins Group do some research on that.
Speaker 5: They are an inner circle of government military members who
Speaker 5: believe strongly that this is it where the big fight
Speaker 5: is coming to fight aliens which are really demons. In
Speaker 5: the name of all of this stuff that we're talking about.
Speaker 5: This is not a new concept. This has been around
Speaker 5: and infecting in the swamp of the Hidden hand that's
Speaker 5: been steering a lot of this stuff. Why is that again,
Speaker 5: It just all seems part of a grander scheme. Now,
Speaker 5: as far as the spiritual stuff is concerned, I'm very
Speaker 5: concerned that these Christian Zionis pastors are going to be
Speaker 5: the ones that want to try to be like, oh,
Speaker 5: don't worry about it the aliens. This like they're going
Speaker 5: to tell them that these are fallen angels, that they're demons,
Speaker 5: and basically telling them these are vampires. And you all
Speaker 5: know the law about vampires, and you know how to
Speaker 5: protect yourself from vampires. You grab the garlic, you grab
Speaker 5: the holy water, right, you do all the things. But
Speaker 5: what happens if you're doing that against the vampire and
Speaker 5: it doesn't work? Because what if the vampire isn't really
Speaker 5: a vampire and it's like some sort of android robot
Speaker 5: or something. Aha, So what if these aliens are like, oh,
Speaker 5: don't worry about it, you're a safe person. We've heard
Speaker 5: all these stories that have been seeded in some of
Speaker 5: the ufologist's stories about how like when you have an
Speaker 5: alien encounter or a UFO abduction, just call out the
Speaker 5: name of Jesus and it immediately stops. And now I
Speaker 5: do agree that some of these abduction stories might be
Speaker 5: related to that, because a lot of them that's more different,
Speaker 5: because I think there's a distinct difference between demon possession
Speaker 5: and versus like a physical being. But as you pointed
Speaker 5: out so keenly, sir, mister Brian McClain, mister hesher that
Speaker 5: like you're looking at a little green man, how do
Speaker 5: we know that's not a physical thing that was created
Speaker 5: here on Earth in a lab. How do you know
Speaker 5: that these UFOs flying around came from Mars or that
Speaker 5: we didn't build that on an underground, deep bunker base
Speaker 5: somewhere here on the planet Earth forever. In particular, I
Speaker 5: mentioned ancient aliens. They're famous for doing this, so like, oh,
Speaker 5: look at this massive marvel that we raised. We were
Speaker 5: born into a history, a world where we taught and
Speaker 5: learned about the pyramids and how they were built, Like
Speaker 5: this is a marvel, master man made form of engineering.
Speaker 5: But ancient aliens on the History Channel has been rewriting
Speaker 5: history saying, oh, no, man is crap, Man is not
Speaker 5: in cap There's no way man could build that thousands
Speaker 5: of years ago. How the hell could they do that?
Speaker 5: They suck? Obviously aliens made it. You see what I'm saying.
Speaker 5: I think they want to say the same thing about
Speaker 5: religion and your beliefs. So if you are a true
Speaker 5: believing person and you run into an alien and you
Speaker 5: tell go away, demon in the name of Jesus Christ,
Speaker 5: and it doesn't go away, what does that do to
Speaker 5: your faith in Jesus Christ? I bet you that would
Speaker 5: deflate that like a little balloon, right, that's probably not good?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and whatever, whatever? What the hell is planned?
Speaker 1: My god? I can't even think, like I don't even
Speaker 1: want to conceptualize, like what's going to be presented to
Speaker 1: people and what they're programmed, Like, you know, problem solution
Speaker 1: reaction plan is going to be, Like why at this
Speaker 1: point We're going to talk about this hauntavirus thing in
Speaker 1: a bit here, but like, why at this point, after
Speaker 1: what happened in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one, would
Speaker 1: anyone who's willing to have an open mind and do
Speaker 1: a lot of you know, just a medium amount of
Speaker 1: reading and viewing and listening trust any government on this
Speaker 1: planet to tell them the truth about UFOs, UAPs, extraterrestrials,
Speaker 1: interdimensional beings or anything like that. Like the fact fact
Speaker 1: that people are willing to trust media, trust podcasters, trust
Speaker 1: governments about something so big is a pretty damning statement
Speaker 1: on humanity, pretty damning statement on the overall IQ level
Speaker 1: of like the sophistication of twenty first century culture, the
Speaker 1: understanding of the technology, the understanding of the evolution of propaganda.
Speaker 1: Like I really really used to There's a version of
Speaker 1: me further back in the rearview mirror on the timeline
Speaker 1: that really thought like, if we made it to where
Speaker 1: we are right now on the timeline, that most people
Speaker 1: would get it. I'm glad I left that version behind
Speaker 1: because he would be so disappointed in how many people
Speaker 1: actually get it at this point. They're lying to us,
Speaker 1: they're feeding us garbage, and this is such a you know, okay,
Speaker 1: I don't like having to be an asshole about UFOs.
Speaker 1: You know, I've given you a couple of personal stories.
Speaker 1: You know, my uncle who had Treasure Rest in Peace
Speaker 1: loved that stuff. The younger version of me love that stuff.
Speaker 1: The movies about it, Oh my goodness. We had so
Speaker 1: many cool movies growing up, right. We had close contact,
Speaker 1: We had et we had Predator, which one pharaoh march
Speaker 1: Mars attacks what a classic, right, all this stuff. We
Speaker 1: had an Independence Day well just perfectly timed. Right now
Speaker 1: is a new Steven Spielberg movie called Disclosure Day. Nice,
Speaker 1: that's releasing on June twelfth. It's May eighth, so it's
Speaker 1: a month and a few days away.
Speaker 4: Please tell me this is like in court, like same
Speaker 4: day they are releasing those files.
Speaker 1: Can you I would not be surprised whatsoever if UFO
Speaker 1: dot gov populates the day that Disclosure Day comes out.
Speaker 5: It's already populated that they already released the first trunch.
Speaker 1: All right, well maybe second trunch, maybe second trunch on
Speaker 1: July twelfth. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we already knew about this though, and I forgot
Speaker 5: to mention that there was a lot of So waite
Speaker 5: a minute, you're telling me all of this was just
Speaker 5: a publicity stunt to get more people to watch this movie.
Speaker 1: I'm just kidding.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, so basically the plot of the movie. The
Speaker 4: film focuses on humanity receiving proof of extra tourist life
Speaker 4: and the subsequent chaotic world reaction. It's the same exact
Speaker 4: what's in the freaking article, yep, and what we're just
Speaker 4: talking about.
Speaker 1: Yep. We had a Hollywood movie just queued up ready
Speaker 1: for drop, like just you know, a few weeks after
Speaker 1: what's going down this.
Speaker 5: Week somebody got their wires crossed. You're supposed to do
Speaker 5: the movie first before, right, in real life.
Speaker 4: It should be like a year or two before, you know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, But I mean, honestly, we've had a whole lifetime
Speaker 1: of these movies, like pretty much since like the nineteen forties,
Speaker 1: right since forty seven. Basically we've been getting this stuff.
Speaker 5: Well that's an interesting year, isn't it anyway?
Speaker 4: But nothing, nothing spoke about that. I don't recall any
Speaker 4: of them was around that plot. The chaos that happened
Speaker 4: once a disclosure come out. It's almost either like an
Speaker 4: alien invasion, right or some kind of war. But that
Speaker 4: plot is a new one. Yeah, here you go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well it's just ever so slightly he knew,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. It's like watching a new
Speaker 1: zombie movie, like you're looking for just the smallest change
Speaker 1: in the paradigm to be like, oh, that's original, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean, Like we've had so many of them.
Speaker 1: You're right though, it's it's and it makes me think
Speaker 1: of that movie the Obama's produced too.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, that one was.
Speaker 1: About cyber the world behind yeah, behind yep, with what's
Speaker 1: her face?
Speaker 5: Well, this could all be this could all be done together,
Speaker 5: all at the same time. I mean, the aliens could
Speaker 5: come down here land on the White House lawn. One
Speaker 5: of the alien sneezes gives everybody a virus that we
Speaker 5: have to get a Q virus ally yeah, and then
Speaker 5: what was the other missing piece? Oh and then one
Speaker 5: of the aliens, uh renegade teenager son is a hacker
Speaker 5: and he he cyber attacks the planet.
Speaker 1: Right, I mean it's kind of like this one right here.
Speaker 1: I saw this one on X today. They called it
Speaker 1: the hat trick. You've got the Illuminati eye in the middle.
Speaker 1: You've got alien invasion at the top, cyber attack at
Speaker 1: one base, and virus pandemic at the other base. Like nice,
Speaker 1: It is pretty cool graphic, right, I mean it doesn't
Speaker 1: make me feel good, but cool graphic.
Speaker 5: What do you call it when you do all three
Speaker 5: at once?
Speaker 1: Yeah, call it the Illuminati centipede.
Speaker 5: And that's the show. Folks were out.
Speaker 1: That was posted by Face like the Sun and they
Speaker 1: said they're going for the hat trick, which is pretty good.
Speaker 1: All right, So we've got I guess we should talk
Speaker 1: about this whole Haunt of virus thing too, huh. Since
Speaker 1: we just showed the graphics x files. Yeah. And the
Speaker 1: funny thing about this is base all of what we're
Speaker 1: talking about here in the headlines today except maybe AI
Speaker 1: cyber attack. And I could probably be proven wrong about
Speaker 1: this is like a plot line in X files multiple times.
Speaker 5: Oh dude, our our life is what did? I just
Speaker 5: posted a meme the other day where it was like
Speaker 5: it was, oh, it was a mister Bean character. He's
Speaker 5: trying to copy the other student's paper next to him,
Speaker 5: and so the good student doing the paper, it says
Speaker 5: conspiracy theorists and mister Bean trying to copy. It is
Speaker 5: News Headlines twenty twenty six. Perfect, exactly, all.
Speaker 1: Right, Phair, You dropping me a couple of links here?
Speaker 1: What I got?
Speaker 4: Oh no, I would, just because when you guys were
Speaker 4: talking about Trump and the and the religion, the religious.
Speaker 5: Tone in the d there's some links to drop in
Speaker 5: the show notes.
Speaker 1: I gotcha.
Speaker 5: What we were saying.
Speaker 4: Just just just yeah, it's just really talks about that
Speaker 4: video based it was white Yeah, yeah, and the White
Speaker 4: House and they are a dude. They just talking about
Speaker 4: Iranians and how the Bible saying Iranians are going to
Speaker 4: kill all the Jews and oh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah. And Paula White, she's she's like at
Speaker 1: the top of her game, comparing Trump to Jesus does
Speaker 1: this all the time? What a grift? What a grift?
Speaker 4: Yeah? And and and the other one is just I mean,
Speaker 4: you don't have to put that other article, but it's
Speaker 4: just more it talks about the new Apostolic Reformation, which
Speaker 4: is really that groove that is just taken over where
Speaker 4: all these guys belong to. And it's that's where that
Speaker 4: I would call it the difficult the.
Speaker 5: End of the door cult.
Speaker 4: Like, yes, it is absolutely right.
Speaker 5: It's concerning that these type of people would be sure
Speaker 5: in like important positions, not just in the government, but
Speaker 5: in the freaking military.
Speaker 1: Whoa, yeah, yeah, yeah, you know.
Speaker 4: I hate to say that, but you know, like the
Speaker 4: left has been talking about this for a while, right,
Speaker 4: that this madness is gonna happen, right, And I did
Speaker 4: not honestly expected to happen, right because I thought there's
Speaker 4: more of Ah, that's the best way to say. I
Speaker 4: did not expect it to happen here in you as
Speaker 4: to be honest. But I what I'm seeing, what I'm
Speaker 4: what I'm seeing scares me, right, and and and and
Speaker 4: that's that's I see fascism is going to happen. And
Speaker 4: I see I and I see that group and and
Speaker 4: total surveillance, and they're gonna like sell it to people
Speaker 4: under Jesus name somehow, you know, and and and you
Speaker 4: can see that whole thing is gonna get spinned.
Speaker 1: Ah man, It's it seems like I don't know, dude,
Speaker 1: it seems like a pathetic attempt to me at this point,
Speaker 1: because like there was a continue of like gen Z
Speaker 1: that was because really the youth are probably the most
Speaker 1: important if they want something like that to have any
Speaker 1: sort of life span. Right, So you kind of had
Speaker 1: Liker your TPUSA cult following, and you know, like young
Speaker 1: people were engaged up until this election to an extent, right,
Speaker 1: But now it's just like there've been completely left in
Speaker 1: the dust, Like who is that narrative actually? For like,
Speaker 1: for example, Erica Kirk is a laughing stock. She is
Speaker 1: a joke, especially to young people. No one is buying
Speaker 1: her stick and her crocodile tears and all this weird
Speaker 1: acting that she's doing, like the dipstick is low on
Speaker 1: acceptance for this, So it's like, who are they really
Speaker 1: gearing this at? You know, I hate to even ask
Speaker 1: because I don't want to single out a day demographic,
Speaker 1: but it's like, it's got to be a really low
Speaker 1: IQ demographic.
Speaker 4: It is. It is, And honestly, like I mean Trump
Speaker 4: right now, he's like in the negative was below thirty, right,
Speaker 4: I think.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just it's off off a cliff interesting.
Speaker 4: Because in twenty twenty four his election, he was really
Speaker 4: getting great numbers, right, and they give him the push,
Speaker 4: but they I say, whatever you want to but to
Speaker 4: say about this generation, but I think that generation gets
Speaker 4: it fast. And I don't think. I don't think that
Speaker 4: tricks they are playing right now is going to work.
Speaker 5: On them, to be honest, But this generation, the gen Zers, yeah, okay, yeah,
Speaker 5: I just wanted to make sure I heard you right,
Speaker 5: all right, because I mean there was not a lot
Speaker 5: of hope for that generation until recently.
Speaker 4: Well, and I'm not saying there is necessarily hope from well,
Speaker 4: let me take that back. What I'm saying is I
Speaker 4: don't think that all technique they used on boomers right
Speaker 4: is going to work in the usion the new generation.
Speaker 4: And I don't think they figured out yet. I think
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk figured it out right, And I think they
Speaker 4: were trusting him, but a lot of them so through
Speaker 4: this whole Israel thing, right, And I think that's that's
Speaker 4: a wake up call. And I don't think they are
Speaker 4: going to be able to contain that beast anymore. I
Speaker 4: think that's out And what Trump is doing right now
Speaker 4: is just even making it worse.
Speaker 5: So I mentioned, I mentioned the generations in the context
Speaker 5: of the childhood's ends thing, but that that was something
Speaker 5: that the guy who he can't say who had the
Speaker 5: mustache in history, he was also very keen about, you know,
Speaker 5: raising an entire generation of youths to be brainwashed and
Speaker 5: propagandized into a particular belief system. Allegedly, at least that's
Speaker 5: what we were taught in school, you know what I'm saying. So,
Speaker 5: and by the way, in case you didn't know, the
Speaker 5: school is nothing but that just an indoctrination system slow
Speaker 5: drip to you across like what is a twelve hears
Speaker 5: for most people you or take a couple, depending on
Speaker 5: who you are.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and how much learning's actually going on there versus misdoctrinating. Now, Yeah, yep,
Speaker 1: that's the mustache. There def tears that one toothbrush mustache,
Speaker 1: that one all right, so we'll put a couple of
Speaker 1: those support links on tonight's show page. You are watching
Speaker 1: the boiler Room. We're listening to the boiler Room, and
Speaker 1: there is show page associated with every episode. You can
Speaker 1: find out our website, Alternatecurrentradio dot com. All our support
Speaker 1: links are up there as well if you want to
Speaker 1: support the show. We've got some merch that probably needs
Speaker 1: to be redesigned, but some classic merch up there. We've
Speaker 1: got you know, swear jar and all that good stuff.
Speaker 1: So Alternate Current Radio dot com is the website, and
Speaker 1: be sure and follow Ruckus and I on the X
Speaker 1: while you can. We mand up like Pharaoh and just
Speaker 1: bail out of there at some point. But I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm personally a little too addicted to doom scrolling, so
Speaker 1: we'll see. I just can't. I'm one of those people
Speaker 1: that just can't look away from a train wrack. So
Speaker 1: X is definitely a train wreck. And if you haven't
Speaker 1: liked and subscribed and done all that stuff yet, please
Speaker 1: do so. We're broadcasting live tonight on X on YouTube,
Speaker 1: on Rumble, and going out shortly after the live show
Speaker 1: to the larger audio podcast platforms. You can find boiler
Speaker 1: room on all that stuff. Let's talk about hauntavirus. You guys,
Speaker 1: what the fuck is going on? I'm hearing there like
Speaker 1: all the same crap I heard before. It's it feels
Speaker 1: like like we're being tested here. Are they kind of
Speaker 1: dipsticking the public to see if they're willing to mask
Speaker 1: up again because of a rat virus or if maybe
Speaker 1: they'll be afraid of the lab coat guys and their
Speaker 1: ability to do gain of function research. We haven't seen
Speaker 1: any of that yet, but we hear they do it.
Speaker 1: There's spend a lot of your tax dollars doing it
Speaker 1: so in weird foreign countries and stuff. But hey, is
Speaker 1: there a cruise liner stuck somewhere with a bunch of
Speaker 1: sick people on it and no one wants to a
Speaker 1: little bit of poor But then they end up at
Speaker 1: home magically somehow, I mean the whole thing they're telling us.
Speaker 1: There's different strains of it. There's cases here, there's cases there. Oh,
Speaker 1: these people are stuck. Oh never mind, they're home their self,
Speaker 1: containing themselves. I'm seeing a lot of echoes of shit.
Speaker 1: I don't like coming back this week, you guys, And
Speaker 1: I hope everybody's laughing at it, like I am.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, it's really interesting story, right. So basically,
Speaker 4: apparently two people were like when are they They were
Speaker 4: in one of the forests, rainforests, somewhere.
Speaker 1: In Argentina, I think.
Speaker 4: Argentina, thank you, yep, Argentina. And then they got I
Speaker 4: guess they contacted hunta virus and they got on the
Speaker 4: chip and three people dead and one is a serious condition.
Speaker 4: And then a bunch of them is in hospitals. So
Speaker 4: and I think the ship is still stuck out somewhere
Speaker 4: in the water.
Speaker 5: I'm hearing conflict yourself, sir, do you have evidence of
Speaker 5: this ship? Is the ship in the room with you?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 4: I know, right?
Speaker 1: USS ghost ship? Perhaps USS fake pandemic ship.
Speaker 5: It's okay, real we saw we saw the video of
Speaker 5: a guy who just happens to be a travel blogger. Well,
Speaker 5: so the interesting probably suffering from monkey pocks, if you
Speaker 5: catch my meaning.
Speaker 4: Anyway, so the interesting thing is like Butterus is, isn't
Speaker 4: it butters what's another who guy?
Speaker 1: Oh? Oh yeah, yeah, the who guys?
Speaker 4: Yeah, he comes out and like, yeah, I hope that
Speaker 4: this is a reminder for us that you should not
Speaker 4: leave who should come back virus. What basically he was
Speaker 4: like coming out and saying, how you need everybody needs
Speaker 4: to join WHO again and accept WHO you know rules
Speaker 4: that they were trying to pass right because WHO is
Speaker 4: beyond any borders and they can respond at any point
Speaker 4: of time to whatever comes out.
Speaker 1: So I think I have the clip or at least
Speaker 1: I have a forty second snippet here check this out.
Speaker 8: But how does that try let in a global solidarity?
Speaker 8: I will let time to tell, but we really need
Speaker 8: this incident, this outbreak because seeing why the world needs
Speaker 8: a global entity that coordinates this Argentina support, how they
Speaker 8: can forward the support we are receiving now from US institution.
Speaker 8: As we live in an interconnected world, that outbreak from
Speaker 8: one part affects everywhere. So in terms of collaboration, we
Speaker 8: are going both through the technical collaborations in sharing information
Speaker 8: guidance we rely heavily as DG multiple side. What I'm
Speaker 8: saying is that the expertise of usc DC is an
Speaker 8: asset for the world and we have been benefiting from that.
Speaker 1: Okay, i'sop that right there. That wasn't Tadros, that was
Speaker 1: a different one from the WHO. But basically saying I
Speaker 1: mean even maybe worse than we need the WHO is
Speaker 1: we need a global global health entity. I mean yeah,
Speaker 1: probably referring to the WHO. But the way that he
Speaker 1: said that made me wonder if maybe they're not cooking
Speaker 1: up some like globalist offshoot of.
Speaker 5: This and Steve Woodkoff are about to announce the Trump
Speaker 5: World vision of health, peace for freedom around Yeah, just kidding,
Speaker 5: I could you imagine that?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Oh so there was that. Thanks for bringing that
Speaker 1: one up, Pharaoh. I'm sure there's footage of Tadros too.
Speaker 1: These these people are like vultures that circle when these
Speaker 1: headlines start to start to drop. So of course they're
Speaker 1: doing what they do.
Speaker 5: If you want to get into any of the conspiratorial stuff,
Speaker 5: let me know, I have a hole.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, well, I was just going to bring up
Speaker 1: Pamela's comment here because I saw this one as well.
Speaker 1: Haunt a virus hype does a new pandemic threat? Does
Speaker 1: appear Invisor's mRNA COVID job side effects even says what
Speaker 1: page there, page thirty three, just for you ruckus just
Speaker 1: free's page thirty three in time for more liability free
Speaker 1: jabs in the whostockpile.
Speaker 5: I did see that and before I saw that there
Speaker 5: was already quite a number of thirty threes surrounding this story,
Speaker 5: not to mention the fact that thirty three years ago,
Speaker 5: in nineteen ninety three, which is when I was getting
Speaker 5: ready to vacate the state of New Hampshire to move
Speaker 5: to the state of New Mexico in order to attend
Speaker 5: college in New Mexico. My mother was in tears about
Speaker 5: my decision, which was made in nineteen ninety three, the
Speaker 5: year before I graduated, and lo and behold nationwide news
Speaker 5: read alert everybody in a little unknown to me at
Speaker 5: the time, place something called four Corners region of the
Speaker 5: United States of America, specifically in New Mexico, thirty three
Speaker 5: people died of or contracted There were thirty three cases confirmed.
Speaker 5: That's what it was. Thirty three cases in New Mexico.
Speaker 5: So there you go, thirty three years ago, thirty three cases.
Speaker 5: It's a side effect on page thirty three, all sorts
Speaker 5: of thirty threes go and like crazy. I bet you anything,
Speaker 5: we could probably look up in some gematria, calendar haunt,
Speaker 5: a virus, it probably ads up to thirty three or something.
Speaker 5: I don't know. So it's just already out of the gate,
Speaker 5: You're like, ah, okay, so it's kind of obvious. It's
Speaker 5: a bit of a sigh up. So either that could
Speaker 5: be incredibly concerning or it could just be they do
Speaker 5: this all the time. I think that this is a
Speaker 5: clear target. This is not for the whole world. This
Speaker 5: is just for the people who are already scared of
Speaker 5: this crap. Just hearing this story probably already sent people
Speaker 5: running and screaming, wearing six masks and a plastic barrier
Speaker 5: in their car to the doctor to go ask them
Speaker 5: for the newest haunt of virus jab which doesn't exist yet.
Speaker 5: But don't worry, there is one coming soon because interestingly enough, Pfizer,
Speaker 5: who miraculously saved the world six years five years ago
Speaker 5: for whatever it was. You do the math, they've been
Speaker 5: busy working on the next one, just in case something
Speaker 5: happened to end lucky for us, the one that they've
Speaker 5: been spending all this time on happens to be for
Speaker 5: Can anyone guess what it is? Does anyone know? It's
Speaker 5: the Haunter virus?
Speaker 1: So I said this like one hundred thousand times when
Speaker 1: I was broadcasting at TNT. I said it a whole
Speaker 1: bunch here on the boiler room and in Sunday Wire.
Speaker 1: This is the reason why it's called a pandemic industrial complex.
Speaker 1: And we told you this would happen, We told you
Speaker 1: this was coming. They now have the ability, after all
Speaker 1: of the money that they gave themselves out of thin
Speaker 1: fucking air, while our tuna sandwiches skyrocketed up to twenty dollars,
Speaker 1: all the money they gave themselves. Guess what, they set
Speaker 1: up an entire industrial complex around them, concept of a
Speaker 1: global pandemic, all right. And they, those that profit from
Speaker 1: this global pandemic industrial complex, by their own words and
Speaker 1: white papers, have shown us how proud they are that
Speaker 1: they can now model on a computer some sort of
Speaker 1: virus strain and then match that to a PCR test, right,
Speaker 1: a magical PCR test, which, by the way, guess what,
Speaker 1: nothing has changed about PCR tests. They are not a
Speaker 1: diagnostic test, as the inventor and designer, Carrie Mullen said
Speaker 1: multiple times before he passed away with such odd timing
Speaker 1: at a time when you know, the world could have
Speaker 1: really used him to help explain these things to us.
Speaker 1: But what they have set up is a way to
Speaker 1: use a computer to model a virus and then use
Speaker 1: a PCR test that has been tuned to that model
Speaker 1: and then amplified too many times that it starts reading
Speaker 1: positive on junk DNA on samples, and then they say, oh,
Speaker 1: we have a case. Oh you have this right, And
Speaker 1: what does that mean? That means they just use the
Speaker 1: PCR test as a diagnostic, which it is not, and
Speaker 1: they're using it in concert with a computer model that
Speaker 1: models a virus that has never been isolated, that can
Speaker 1: never be isolated and never will be isolated, and many
Speaker 1: people wonder if it even exists. And the warning that
Speaker 1: myself and many others were giving back then was this
Speaker 1: will continue. They will come up with new ones and
Speaker 1: put them in this exact paradigm that I just described. Well,
Speaker 1: I would argue that here we are, that's exactly what
Speaker 1: we're seeing. I don't know what else to say about it, Like,
Speaker 1: tell me there's a case. I even said ruckus. I
Speaker 1: even saw today a headline saying oh there's the UK variant,
Speaker 1: and I just immediately face palm, just like, fuck off
Speaker 1: with your different variants. Yeah, well, I.
Speaker 4: Mean there's two strains. There is one in South American
Speaker 4: one in northber.
Speaker 1: Why would we believe that why would we believe that
Speaker 1: for a virus that has never been isolated, like every
Speaker 1: other virus, never once isolated, their isolation process is bullshit.
Speaker 1: So if they can't isolate it, and they can't get
Speaker 1: a picture of it, and they can't show it to me,
Speaker 1: how can I believe that they're able to distinguish between
Speaker 1: two variants of something that they can't exist.
Speaker 4: Wait, yeah, you're talking what are you talking about?
Speaker 1: Talking about the process that they call isolating a virus,
Speaker 1: which is not isolating a virus.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but which one are you talking about? You're talking
Speaker 4: about the all.
Speaker 5: Of them, from AIDS to haunt a virus, it means
Speaker 5: any virus period, Well.
Speaker 1: All of them. We have a name, we have a
Speaker 1: computer model, we have a test that is made to
Speaker 1: amplify particles, and that's all we have. And they try
Speaker 1: to tell us that we have knowledge. That's not knowledge,
Speaker 1: my friends, That is data. That is data that doesn't
Speaker 1: come with all the context attached to it.
Speaker 5: You know what it almost seems like to me now
Speaker 5: that I'm looking at this, I'm taking a little bit
Speaker 5: of a three thousand foot view here. It's almost like
Speaker 5: there's a different SiO for everyone right now. Like if
Speaker 5: if that sort of thing is like you, you like,
Speaker 5: if you have the side person who's absolutely worried or
Speaker 5: you've been preparing for or even on you know, you're
Speaker 5: like you've been waiting. This is the next syop shoot
Speaker 5: to drop. They're going to do another pandemic here it
Speaker 5: is me. It's like, oh, they're going to do the
Speaker 5: UFO thing to trick the Christians. Here. It is the
Speaker 5: Epstein files and the corruption and exposing the pedos here,
Speaker 5: it is all of these really huge things. It really
Speaker 5: seems like there's one for everybody. Or am I just tripping?
Speaker 1: No, You're one hundred percent right. And I've been saying
Speaker 1: that about the Daily Shooter Program ever since, like I
Speaker 1: don't know, a couple of years ago. It's just like,
Speaker 1: hold on, this used to be the Daily Shooter Program
Speaker 1: used to be for Muslims and right wing extremists, and
Speaker 1: now it's for everybody. Everybody has a psychopath, a narrative,
Speaker 1: you know, to go with any sort of politicized viewpoint,
Speaker 1: whether it's the transshooter or the left wing Bernie bro
Speaker 1: shooter or you know what I mean, there's just like
Speaker 1: one for everybody. So it's just like to me, it
Speaker 1: indicates chaos, an injection of chaos and distrust. Like that's
Speaker 1: what's important, the important takeaway of the narratives when you
Speaker 1: put them all together, it's not about one, you know,
Speaker 1: identity politic or another unless you have a certain identity
Speaker 1: politic and then it's like, oh, that's the one that
Speaker 1: I'm interested in. But then there's all these other inconvenient
Speaker 1: ones that make people like you look bad.
Speaker 5: A lot of this comes to trust, doesn't it. I
Speaker 5: mean I briefly mentioned X Files, but you've probably already
Speaker 5: seen it making the rounds about the Haunt of Virus.
Speaker 5: It was either an episode of X Files or it
Speaker 5: might have been the movie that they made Fight the Future.
Speaker 5: I can't remember, but they made reference to the real
Speaker 5: life story which I talked about, the nineteen ninety three
Speaker 5: Haunt of Virus outbreak. They made reference to that in
Speaker 5: the X file movie about the fictional virus or the
Speaker 5: scenario that was going on there, which spells out the plan.
Speaker 5: As you mentioned earlier, Hesher, I have X Files, those
Speaker 5: conspiracies have all come true. I mean, it was like
Speaker 5: watching a documentary. It's like how the government would use
Speaker 5: a pandemic emergency to round up to people in the
Speaker 5: movie I think or the TV show there was through FEMA.
Speaker 5: Of course, now we're still concerned about that kind of
Speaker 5: thing literally, So it's like, you know, I don't know,
Speaker 5: but again, you know, it's just like they tell you.
Speaker 5: But why did I bring up X files and trust?
Speaker 5: Because X file taught us what was there a big
Speaker 5: tagline the fox Mulders to trust no one right, right,
Speaker 5: And then what we've been hearing throughout the pandemic, it
Speaker 5: was trust the science, right, and then under A Trump's
Speaker 5: administration it's been trust and President Trump quite literally trust
Speaker 5: the plan. You got to trust the plan too, you know. Anyways,
Speaker 5: but you see what I mean, A lot of this
Speaker 5: they're telling us who to trust you, hey, Like I
Speaker 5: have never personally may maybe it's just me. I've never
Speaker 5: met anyone in my own real life that I actually
Speaker 5: trust where they have to tell me all the time
Speaker 5: trust me, or you can trust me or you It's
Speaker 5: like either I do or I don't. You don't have
Speaker 5: to keep doing, you know what I mean? Like usually
Speaker 5: there's a warning sign, right do you keep telling me
Speaker 5: to trust you?
Speaker 1: Right? And I mean like think about like you know
Speaker 1: you and me hanging out, Like the last time we
Speaker 1: had a moment like that, it was whether the song
Speaker 1: we were hearing was a cover of the Misfits or
Speaker 1: who was the other band? Yeah, and it turned out
Speaker 1: I was saying it was Sam Hayne and you were
Speaker 1: saying it was them, and it turned out it was
Speaker 1: the Misfits. And it's just like, that's one of the
Speaker 1: only times I think we've both looked at each other
Speaker 1: and going, no, bro, trust me. It turned out we
Speaker 1: were both wrong. It happens, so yeah, go ahead, man.
Speaker 4: No, I mean, the interesting thing about this whole incident
Speaker 4: is there is the way it's spreading, right, and how
Speaker 4: they're amplifying it. Number One, it is not like a
Speaker 4: highly supposedly not a highly contagious virus, right. And then
Speaker 4: it's it's rarely transmitted from a human to human.
Speaker 1: Like monkey box. Right. There's only certain situations.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Like it needs to be really very close contact, right, yeah, close?
Speaker 4: So why are they making it a big deal? Plus,
Speaker 4: I mean I've been freaking like, you know, everybody talks
Speaker 4: about hunt virus around here. Just when you see mouse poop,
Speaker 4: just be careful around it. You don't get hunted. It's
Speaker 4: nothing new, Like why are they making it a freaking
Speaker 4: big deal? And it's not just actually hunter virus? So
Speaker 4: right now in Tennessee ticks is like it's fear mongering
Speaker 4: about ticks right now, this is a new thing. Yeah,
Speaker 4: you're not for meat, right, for.
Speaker 5: The alpha gal.
Speaker 4: Syndrome Yeah yeah, exactly, disease and the lime disease.
Speaker 1: Right another government.
Speaker 4: Now it's now a big deal, like apparently there's a
Speaker 4: big infestation in southeast US right now? Was dicks? So
Speaker 4: is the goal is just for you to sit home
Speaker 4: and just don't get out?
Speaker 1: Yeah, stay on X right.
Speaker 4: Right is it? Hey? Maybe the fuel is expensive, so
Speaker 4: you better just stay home, don't go anywhere. Right, I
Speaker 4: don't know, man.
Speaker 5: I was going to go on the family vacation, but
Speaker 5: the budget airlines choice selection has got thiner since Spirit
Speaker 5: Airlines after thirty three years, has closed down.
Speaker 1: I heard of you five years ago. Yeah, well, you know,
Speaker 1: speaking of trust, I think now might be a good
Speaker 1: time to bring up someone else that we're expected to trust, right,
Speaker 1: who's been a complete hypocrite, especially in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty gil baits, Oh, gil Bates, Right, I
Speaker 1: knew it was going to be him gil Baits and Argentina. Right,
Speaker 1: that's the place where the boat allegedly got stuck.
Speaker 4: Wait is he the museum too?
Speaker 5: God?
Speaker 1: Well, let's let's just you know, let's let's do a
Speaker 1: little opposition research here. Let's let's listen to why we
Speaker 1: should trust Gil Bates and people that want to do
Speaker 1: experiments on mosquitoes and release them into the wild.
Speaker 9: I'm Scott O'Neil here in medic In, Columbia today, and
Speaker 9: I'm at the world's biggest mosquito factory for the World
Speaker 9: Mosquito Program. We're making in here thirty million mosquitoes a week.
Speaker 4: Come and have a look tonight.
Speaker 3: We're doing it for a very serious reason. Cities like Medicine.
Speaker 10: Have suffered from diseases like dangy zica chicken decas, but
Speaker 10: not anymore. We've been able to bring the solution of
Speaker 10: all back here mosquitoes to the city. When this back
Speaker 10: to area called Warbecka gets introduced into the mosquito it
Speaker 10: stops their ability.
Speaker 3: To transmit danngy. We release mosquitoes that have willback here
Speaker 3: and now they go in mate and Wallbacha gets passed
Speaker 3: into the wild. Mosquito population if we're going to control
Speaker 3: these diseases in all the tropical cities of the world,
Speaker 3: is going to require a lot of mosquitoes. The mosquito
Speaker 3: life cycle starts with the egg. And in this room,
Speaker 3: we've got a lot of eggs. Each one of these strips,
Speaker 3: these tiny black dots are up to ten thousand mosquito
Speaker 3: eggs across all of these strips, about one and a
Speaker 3: half knee and dried eggs waiting to hatch. In this tray,
Speaker 3: we've got the newly hatched eggs, their little larvae so
Speaker 3: small you can hardly see them.
Speaker 1: I think you get the point. So we're we just
Speaker 1: have to trust you guys that the science they showed
Speaker 1: us there, right, this is science that we are trusting.
Speaker 1: And what did they give us to instill trust? They
Speaker 1: gave us a PowerPoint slide with a couple of circles
Speaker 1: going from the jabbed mosquito to the other mosquitoes and
Speaker 1: just claiming that, hey, this will make it so these
Speaker 1: mosquitos can no longer transmit dangy and all these other things.
Speaker 1: So I don't know, do you trust them, Pharaoh? Do
Speaker 1: you do you trust them on that? Or do you
Speaker 1: think this is maybe the kind of experiment that I
Speaker 1: don't know. Some might argue could play a role in
Speaker 1: something like this.
Speaker 4: Let's pour this way. Human never buy engineered anything, and
Speaker 4: it turned out the way they wanted to be. Yeah, right, Yeah,
Speaker 4: we're by engineering the weather and it's going to backfire
Speaker 4: on us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we've got floods, we've got mud slides, we've got fires,
Speaker 1: that's right.
Speaker 4: We supposedly buy engineered viruses and we created coronavirus and
Speaker 4: whatever else. We buy engineering mosquitoes right now? Right, So,
Speaker 4: I mean.
Speaker 5: Bra like as it was in the days of Noah. No,
Speaker 5: I'm just kidding, but they're they're doing that too.
Speaker 4: Out Here is here is here's the point, right, is
Speaker 4: something in that scale it's impossible to reverse right and
Speaker 4: and and and there is no way you can determine
Speaker 4: the outcome. How the hell can you determine an outcome
Speaker 4: of something like this. It's uncontrollable. It's not science, right,
Speaker 4: it's uncontrollable. That makes it outside actually reckless.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so infidels, I'm sorry I keep reverting to
Speaker 1: your original name. Tonight, Pharaoh, riddle me this. I mean
Speaker 1: you're our science office or aboard the Starship boiler room.
Speaker 1: If an experiment is not repeatable, if it's not something
Speaker 1: you can design and repeat or do at scale, right, like,
Speaker 1: maybe make it small scale at first and then prove
Speaker 1: out that it is scalable. Is it even science?
Speaker 4: If you cannot replicate it, then it's not a valid Uh,
Speaker 4: it's not a valid experiment. That's part of the peer
Speaker 4: review process, Right, it's supposed to be publish it and
Speaker 4: someone else if they cannot replicate it, then basically it's bogus.
Speaker 5: If you can replicate it with a PCR test.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the problem. Give.
Speaker 4: Well, that's that's called fudging results. Right, that's a different.
Speaker 1: Store, institutionally institutionally fudging results and doing it across borders
Speaker 1: so that people like that goal that we just looked
Speaker 1: at from the who can make claims like we need
Speaker 1: a GLO Doble health body.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but this is just beyond science. This is a
Speaker 4: really rickless behavior. Yes, or wherever the hell government allows
Speaker 4: an entity like this to run a mass scale experiment
Speaker 4: that cannot be reversed, the same shit that happened with
Speaker 4: the mRNA job, Right, we released it out and we
Speaker 4: run this live experiment on people lives and whatever the hell?
Speaker 4: Right now, we're seeing the results of that experiment, right
Speaker 4: and we have not even seen everything yet, right.
Speaker 5: So, and that mad scientist guy, remember the billionaire scientist
Speaker 5: who is releasing something into the atmosphere to reflect the
Speaker 5: sunback to save the planet. Some crazy shit.
Speaker 1: Bill Gates involved with that too.
Speaker 5: Yeah, you know, weird? Huh.
Speaker 1: Thirty million. According to this report, thirty million genetically modified
Speaker 1: mosquitoes are released every week in eleven countries because Bill
Speaker 1: knows better than nature what could possibly go wrong? And
Speaker 1: let me let me just play this part again here
Speaker 1: real quick. I want to hear the name of this stuff.
Speaker 1: He's got a magic juicy names.
Speaker 3: He goes to the city when this bacteria cold go back.
Speaker 1: In kids, Walbachia. There it is, right there on the screen, Wallbachia.
Speaker 1: May I pause the video right there thirty one seconds
Speaker 1: in to three minutes and eleven seconds and ask the
Speaker 1: fuck is Wallbachia? What is that? Killawatt in the discord
Speaker 1: chat wants to know is it laced with mRNA Wax?
Speaker 1: I would like to know that too, dude, What is it?
Speaker 1: What's wallbach What can I expect of people that have
Speaker 1: been bit by a Mosquito.
Speaker 8: That is.
Speaker 1: Trafficking wall back.
Speaker 5: Ya, But have you seen that show The Walking Dead?
Speaker 1: Right twenty eight days later? Right, you've seen that one.
Speaker 1: Speaking of zombie movies that have something.
Speaker 5: Original rommes, the Crazies maybe, yeah.
Speaker 1: The Misted Kingsman Part two, except that one came through
Speaker 1: your cell phone. But you know, frequencies and nanotech, Hey,
Speaker 1: not far off from each other. Right now? Look, we
Speaker 1: got the whole fucking Schmorgeshborg here tonight, thanks ruckus. We
Speaker 1: got all that shit because that's what we're ready for.
Speaker 5: Out Black Mirrors coming out with a season eight. But
Speaker 5: why bother?
Speaker 1: Right, dude, I don't I don't know why they bother.
Speaker 1: And I don't know why they only make like three
Speaker 1: episodes per season these days? Like come on, guys, I
Speaker 1: mean I get it.
Speaker 5: It. Oh kind of like what counts for an album?
Speaker 1: On Yeah, three AI songs and it's an album all
Speaker 1: of a sudden. So here's the other thing. Okay, just
Speaker 1: back to the Hanta for a second. Here, as Stern
Speaker 1: Drew Crypto points out on X and this is exactly
Speaker 1: what they expected us to believe when COVID nineteen eighty
Speaker 1: four hit. This is like I could be reading to
Speaker 1: you this from twenty twenty, except just find and replace
Speaker 1: hanta and replace it with the other word. Haunt a
Speaker 1: virus teleports worldwide in twenty four hours. I'll stop right
Speaker 1: there first with the headline. If viruses worked the way
Speaker 1: that people told us, the way that the science tells
Speaker 1: us viruses work, they would not travel the planet in
Speaker 1: twenty four hours or forty eight hours or seventy two hours.
Speaker 1: It's virtually impossible. So hauntavirus teleports worldwide in twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: One minute, there is an alleged outbreak on some random
Speaker 1: cruise ship floating in the middle of the ocean. No ports,
Speaker 1: no airports, just a floating peatri dish. Twenty four hours later,
Speaker 1: confirmed cases are popping up in Holland, Singapore, and probably
Speaker 1: everywhere else by breakfast. How magic. That's how hauntavirus does
Speaker 1: not hitch rides on planes like normal viruses. If you
Speaker 1: believe in normal viruses. It does not wait for docking,
Speaker 1: It does not need vectors. It just appears teleports manifests
Speaker 1: like it got the group chat memo Global rollout go time.
Speaker 1: This is not epidemiology. This is sorcery or a perfectly
Speaker 1: timed release. Think about it. Cruise ship equals perfect isolated testing,
Speaker 1: ground instant worldwide cases equals prepositioned or ariosol deployment. Here,
Speaker 1: mileage may vary on that. Media flips the panic switch
Speaker 1: in unison like a goddamn orchestra. They've been running the
Speaker 1: script for years, different name, same magic. Essentially what I'm
Speaker 1: saying here tonight, this is bullshit.
Speaker 5: Yeah, but I don't think this is going to shut
Speaker 5: down the world like the last time, the lockstep. This
Speaker 5: is again, like I said, this is the people who
Speaker 5: were already on board with this, what you mentioned, the pandemic.
Speaker 5: This is how it's always going to be. There's always
Speaker 5: going to be a new virus. It's always going to
Speaker 5: be play out like this in the news, and the
Speaker 5: people who get scared are going to run out and
Speaker 5: purchase the product. This is just a new form of advertising,
Speaker 5: you know. So it's not like it was. But to
Speaker 5: shut down the world would be like one of these
Speaker 5: other major catastrophes we've been discussing tonight, like the alien
Speaker 5: disclosure shutting down the economy, or Iran World War III
Speaker 5: destroying your opportunity to do for gas or groceries, you know,
Speaker 5: what I mean, that type of thing. And I think
Speaker 5: a lot of like a lot of like what we
Speaker 5: did do with a lot of self censorship. They really
Speaker 5: want a lot of people to self isolate that they
Speaker 5: don't want to have to be told to like stay
Speaker 5: in your home. People. They expect people are just going
Speaker 5: to do this by themselves naturally. It's just oh, that's
Speaker 5: what we do, now, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah?
Speaker 4: So, so who is the liable party in that mosquito experiment?
Speaker 4: And I just realize that I've been doing that since
Speaker 4: twenty eleven by.
Speaker 1: The way, Yeah, yeah, it's been going on.
Speaker 4: It's been going on for a while. But who is liable?
Speaker 1: I could tell you. They tell us in the beginning
Speaker 1: of the It's the World Mosquito program Sir.
Speaker 4: Who who do I go after when we're all fucked?
Speaker 4: Let me ask that question.
Speaker 5: If that happens and we're all ft, does it matter
Speaker 5: that we can or cannot go after these people? Would
Speaker 5: it change anything?
Speaker 1: We didn't even go after these friends of Jeffrey, so fuck.
Speaker 5: And by the way, the window of opportunity to arrest
Speaker 5: and prosecute Fauci is closing or has just closed.
Speaker 1: Oh he was pardoned anyway, right.
Speaker 5: He got there, there was still a chance. There was.
Speaker 5: There was one thing and I forgot.
Speaker 1: What it was. So you're telling me there's no chance.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I know, I'm just kidding, but you know, allegedly
Speaker 5: there was a chance.
Speaker 1: So here you go, man to answer your question, World
Speaker 1: Mosquito Program dot Org. There they are right there. How
Speaker 1: could you blame that little girl there doing.
Speaker 5: The funded by who? Established by who?
Speaker 1: Oh you know Gaby or Bill Gay Gilbates or something
Speaker 1: like that.
Speaker 5: You know they have like an about us or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they got a cool Hamburg griven you just like
Speaker 1: ACR does. Let's see here our work go progress? Know
Speaker 1: about us? Can you believe that donors donate? They'll take
Speaker 1: your money if you would like to donate.
Speaker 4: The most cited funders are Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, BOO,
Speaker 4: Welcome Trust, USAID, w h O, UK Government, Australian Government
Speaker 4: program and Monash University. Now, who is not on fun takes?
Speaker 4: I don't think who takes gives money? They only take money?
Speaker 1: Yeah right, No, I didn't.
Speaker 5: I didn't mean the World Health Organization. I meant I
Speaker 5: was wondering who they?
Speaker 4: So those are that Bill and Melinda Gates.
Speaker 1: Is the biggest literally who not who who oh man reimagining.
Speaker 5: Global allegedly like that from that website there was like, hey,
Speaker 5: you can donate it. That that was I recognize that
Speaker 5: pop up form is from any of these generic like
Speaker 5: five O, one C three charity groups like you can
Speaker 5: go and you hey, you donate some money and then
Speaker 5: it's a tax refund or whatever, you know, tax deductible
Speaker 5: thing whatever. Yeah, it's just one of these murky things.
Speaker 5: But yeah, they're probably well meeting people that go in.
Speaker 5: It's like, oh, this sounds like a neat idea. I'm helping,
Speaker 5: and they put toss their hard earned dollars there after
Speaker 5: they had the vast majority of it stolen from them
Speaker 5: in the form of taxes by their government.
Speaker 1: Anyway, I'm helping. Which character is that on Simpson's I'm helping.
Speaker 1: That's Ralph Ralph, a bunch of Ralph's out there. I'm helping. Yeah,
Speaker 1: releasing hope in my wookie reefined possible release hope. Oh
Speaker 1: it sounds so great. So your hope and your possibilities
Speaker 1: are fucking mosquitoes. Seriously, mosquitoes that are holding what was
Speaker 1: that stuff called.
Speaker 5: Good Lord Waffle Choba Jublu.
Speaker 1: Well Bakia, Your hope is a chemical built in a
Speaker 1: lab that we quite literally only get this as a
Speaker 1: definition for I mean.
Speaker 3: It's introduced into the mosquito. It stops their ability to
Speaker 3: transmit danngy. We release mosquitoes that have bullback here and
Speaker 3: then they go one night and bullbeck. It gets passed
Speaker 3: into the wild mosquito population.
Speaker 1: Passed into the wild mosquito population. This, dude, this is
Speaker 1: like to me, this is like the Big Bang theory.
Speaker 1: Like I'm just like, I might be one of the
Speaker 1: most skeptical people you could possibly find about stuff to
Speaker 1: include the origins of mankind. But I tell you what,
Speaker 1: the older I get in, the more I see them
Speaker 1: pushing this kind of crap on us, the more I'm
Speaker 1: almost like, oh my god, I think my Bible friends
Speaker 1: might be right. They've completely fucking lied to us. There's
Speaker 1: no way evolution was even a thing. I know some
Speaker 1: of you are cringing hearing me say that right now,
Speaker 1: but it's true. It's just like even the experts and
Speaker 1: the people that made the theory itself said on their deathbeds,
Speaker 1: this is fucking bullshit. We can't prove it, and you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, how else are we gonna explain all the redheads? Redheads?
Speaker 1: How are we going to explain you? I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: you got nephiloin blood right, soul as stingers are out there.
Speaker 4: The ringa things man, the black gotten.
Speaker 1: Children probably just lost like followers right there.
Speaker 5: Isn't it interesting though, that the the the the mosquitoes,
Speaker 5: the ticks, and the politicians are all bloodsuckers.
Speaker 1: It's like that tool song ticks and leeches.
Speaker 5: Right, and maybe that's next leeches.
Speaker 1: Hey you heard it, man, leeches. I'm sorry that makes
Speaker 1: me think a little bit too much about like scanners
Speaker 1: and certain movies where the aliens come down and like
Speaker 1: literally leech on people and turn them into like you know,
Speaker 1: vessels and ship like that.
Speaker 5: Just like the government does.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we don't even need to make up science
Speaker 1: fiction about that, because that's the reality we live in.
Speaker 5: No ship man, Oh we crap, the reality we live in?
Speaker 5: Do we even? Is this even reality?
Speaker 1: Give me an alternative to this?
Speaker 5: You know, right, there's always that Because there's there's this
Speaker 5: big push We've been discussing it for probably a couple
Speaker 5: of years now about this idea that like the ultimate,
Speaker 5: the ultimate end goal would be, or allegedly is where
Speaker 5: we suspect it is, to just have us lose trust reality,
Speaker 5: right and everything, including what we we our reality? Like
Speaker 5: even does that.
Speaker 1: Mean we don't trust our lying eyes anymore?
Speaker 5: What would that be?
Speaker 8: Like?
Speaker 5: I mean, holy smokes, what kind of magic would they have?
Speaker 5: I mean, do they really need to rip a hole
Speaker 5: in the universe? Or can this be done to us
Speaker 5: physically with all these chemicals and the Wi Fi garbage
Speaker 5: that they've bombardised with radiation, the jabs, you name it, dude,
Speaker 5: I mean, who the hell knows? People talked about that
Speaker 5: mass formation psychosis garbage back during the plandemic there, but
Speaker 5: maybe there was something to that. Maybe there was a
Speaker 5: physical component. Why why did so many people go along
Speaker 5: yet there were a certain select handful of people who didn't.
Speaker 5: It can't just all be what's going on between their ears?
Speaker 5: And maybe there's a physical component here, you.
Speaker 1: Know, maybe, I mean, what would happen if we just
Speaker 1: didn't trust our lying eyes and ears anymore? I can
Speaker 1: answer that. That's that is ruckus. This is for you.
Speaker 1: That is exactly thirty three percent of my fucking doom
Speaker 1: scrolling right now is this even real? What the fuck
Speaker 1: am I seeing? I don't believe my eyes. I need
Speaker 1: fewer comments. I need to read all the comments. I
Speaker 1: need to see the community notes. I need to find
Speaker 1: the associated articles. I mean, what we do has become
Speaker 1: so much more onerous and odious than it used to be,
Speaker 1: because now we have to ask that question doom scrolling, doom,
Speaker 1: scrolling zip of beer, doom scroll, doom scroll, What the
Speaker 1: fuck is this real? Well, I gotta read the comments.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to tap this one. What the fuck
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to read the community note on this?
Speaker 1: What that doesn't help? Now, I'm gonna read all four
Speaker 1: hundred comments on it. Forty eight minutes later, No, thirty
Speaker 1: three minutes later, I come out and I'm like, I
Speaker 1: don't get it.
Speaker 5: So, yeah, we're there forty two the whole time. But
Speaker 5: the thing is, isn't that what we were supposed to
Speaker 5: do anyways, regardless of where we got the information, When
Speaker 5: the CNN or Fox News comes out with the headline
Speaker 5: and we do it back then, Yeah.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Where were we back then when all we
Speaker 1: had the parse was a CNN and they just said
Speaker 1: the same shit over and over again. For hours on end.
Speaker 1: We were here doing it, but oh my god, where
Speaker 1: was everybody else? Now it's just a cacophony. It's just
Speaker 1: a fucking torrent of Oh is which thirty three percent?
Speaker 1: Is this in syop? Bullshit or artificial intelligence?
Speaker 5: Do you remember a long time ago articles used to
Speaker 5: have something called sources?
Speaker 1: Oh I love that.
Speaker 5: That made our job so much easier.
Speaker 1: That's one of the reasons I spent Let me just
Speaker 1: say that is one of the for the first Like,
Speaker 1: this show just reached its eleventh anniversary this year, and
Speaker 1: these guys will attest to this. These guys know Adam
Speaker 1: even knows from back before he was on the show. Like,
Speaker 1: we would do the show, and then I would spend
Speaker 1: like four to six hours after the show making sure
Speaker 1: that every little thing I said, every little thing someone
Speaker 1: else said, every book, every movie, every headline that was
Speaker 1: mentioned was annotated on the show page. And I hoped
Speaker 1: that that was not wasted time on my part. I
Speaker 1: hoped that some people, even one person, might go through
Speaker 1: all the reference links and go, oh my god, like,
Speaker 1: these guys are distilling a ton of information and I'm
Speaker 1: interested in this, and they would read the book and
Speaker 1: watch the interview and you know, rabbit hole that motherfucker
Speaker 1: and I still do this day, try to do that.
Speaker 1: I don't get to do that with Sunday Wires so much.
Speaker 1: I'm actually working on making that better. But I do
Speaker 1: that with boiler room anytime I can. But the tools
Speaker 1: that are available now to do this have condensed the
Speaker 1: amount of time that took me from four to six
Speaker 1: hours to like, you know, hour and a half two
Speaker 1: hours or something like that. Same with show prep, Like
Speaker 1: I can do show prep a lot faster than I
Speaker 1: used to be able to do. It used to be
Speaker 1: like if I did a there was a ratio. If
Speaker 1: I did a two hour boiler room, there was at
Speaker 1: least two hours on the front end and the back
Speaker 1: end of it, so it was a six hour thing
Speaker 1: and it would scale from there. We would go five
Speaker 1: hour shows and I'm doing, you know, fucking like twenty
Speaker 1: hours of stuff to make one show come out, and
Speaker 1: it would come out religiously on Friday when the shows
Speaker 1: were on Thursday. And now you know, we're in a
Speaker 1: situation where it's like, we have all these tools, we
Speaker 1: could make this happen faster, we can make it happen cleaner.
Speaker 1: We can make it happen on fucking video YouTube somehow.
Speaker 1: Lets us hang out here. They didn't do that in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty or twenty twenty one, so thanks. I think
Speaker 1: still would like to get what happened in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: and twenty twenty one resolved, because you know, it resulted
Speaker 1: in a net loss of viewership, support and all that,
Speaker 1: and then you know that hurts us as a business,
Speaker 1: That hurts us personally, and I feel like lawyers should
Speaker 1: maybe be involved or something, or the government should step
Speaker 1: in and you know, fix that. But you know, we
Speaker 1: see the opposite. But us and our colleagues are gaining
Speaker 1: a little bit of traction lately, so that's nice. But
Speaker 1: where does it lead us? I don't know. I'm afraid
Speaker 1: it's all kind of happening in a bit of a
Speaker 1: controlled vacuum, and it's all a little bit late. A
Speaker 1: lot of Johnny cum Lately's and Janey come Lately's who
Speaker 1: are very welcome, But at the same time, it's just
Speaker 1: like a man. We could have really used you guys
Speaker 1: six years ago, could it used you guys ten years ago?
Speaker 1: Scrapping scraping for an audience? Anyways, the situation we're in
Speaker 1: now is interesting because it's one that we raised red
Speaker 1: flags about as soon as we saw that deep fakes
Speaker 1: were becoming a thing, as soon as we saw like,
Speaker 1: we raised red flags about this when Snapchat started letting
Speaker 1: you put a cartoon dog on your face. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: when we started having conversations that were probably too long
Speaker 1: about where that could lead. But guess what where we
Speaker 1: said it could lead is where we are right fucking now,
Speaker 1: where we're sitting there going okay, I doom scroll too much,
Speaker 1: and at least one third of it is a complete
Speaker 1: waste of time and energy because I don't even know
Speaker 1: if it's real.
Speaker 5: Well, because back then hasher, the filter was just the
Speaker 5: cartoon dog fa right, Yeah, Now the filter is you're
Speaker 5: just some like slob dude forty two overweight, drinking diet coke,
Speaker 5: living in your mom's basement, filming yourself on camera. But
Speaker 5: what everybody sees is a super hot chick in her
Speaker 5: twenties doing a strip tease for you, and it looks
Speaker 5: real yep, head to toe.
Speaker 1: And she's got a maga hat on, and she's got.
Speaker 5: Probably billion followers wearing a cross around her neck. I'm sure, Yeah, right,
Speaker 5: probably in the kitchen making cookies or some motherly just
Speaker 5: kidding page.
Speaker 1: Bake trad wife and everybody on the innerwebs lives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, So I don't know, that's the haunt of
Speaker 1: virus thing. That's the reality thing. You guys, got anything
Speaker 1: else to say about either of.
Speaker 5: Those, well, you know, put a cap on what you
Speaker 5: were saying. Y'all have probably heard me mentioned more than
Speaker 5: once on this program as well as my I own
Speaker 5: and others about the Bill Cooper quote that I like
Speaker 5: so much, read everything, listen to everybody, but don't believe
Speaker 5: anything unless you prove it for yourself using your own research.
Speaker 5: The important part is the belief part. It's totally okay
Speaker 5: to doom scroll, it's okay to consume one hundred hours
Speaker 5: of CNN or Fox News. Why the hell you would
Speaker 5: do that to yourself, I don't know. But the problem
Speaker 5: comes when you start to believe that stuff. So if
Speaker 5: you're going to go so far to adopt this as
Speaker 5: your worldview and believe it and be like you're at
Speaker 5: the restaurant arguing with your friend who did the song?
Speaker 5: And so, trust me, it's based on a formation of
Speaker 5: a belief. You can't truly believe something unless you can
Speaker 5: prove that for yourself, right, and then even then sometimes
Speaker 5: we get it wrong.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, let's see here, it's okay.
Speaker 5: To have an open mind too.
Speaker 1: Yeah totally. I was just going to clack out a
Speaker 1: response here, but I'll just read it instead. Karen says,
Speaker 1: what the heck is trad wife? I haven't looked it up.
Speaker 1: Sounds yucky. I would say that it's a real adjective,
Speaker 1: in particular oftentimes for Orthodox Christian women, many of whom
Speaker 1: have made little social media, you know, headways of their own,
Speaker 1: and many of whom are earnest and honest. And then
Speaker 1: there are other ones who have sort of seen that
Speaker 1: and taken it as a trend and tried to capitalize
Speaker 1: on it. So Jamie Hanshaw is a great person to
Speaker 1: go watch talk about this. Her and I have talked
Speaker 1: about a couple of times. Ruckus and her have talked
Speaker 1: about it before. It's almost like a social media and unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I think anyone who liked the term trad wife in
Speaker 1: the beginning is now at the point where it's like, okay,
Speaker 1: it's been sort of commercialized and turned into a social
Speaker 1: media Niche which you know, many people don't like. But
Speaker 1: there's a gray area in there between like your trad
Speaker 1: wives and your niche trad wives. I suppose, I hope
Speaker 1: I did that.
Speaker 5: Proper trad of course is traditional, So there's always that
Speaker 5: siop happening there because there's a lot of people that
Speaker 5: don't like the grifty trad lifestyle. So that that puts
Speaker 5: that puts traditional things in a bad light. And if
Speaker 5: you're a traditional conservative values type person, well you already
Speaker 5: see the problem.
Speaker 1: Right Yeah. Anything that can be turned into a niche
Speaker 1: online at this point is.
Speaker 4: That's why we drifting. Well, I mean, that's why I
Speaker 4: reject labels period. Like, yeah, it's like you don't need
Speaker 4: to call a wife trad wife.
Speaker 1: That is just right. Did you make you a sandwich
Speaker 1: or not? Are things cool or not? Like we don't
Speaker 1: need to.
Speaker 4: It's just ridiculous.
Speaker 5: Yeah, this tradition right right, Well in my family, we
Speaker 5: had this tradition. Yeah, traditions are not necessarily cultural or
Speaker 5: related to your country. It could be something just inside
Speaker 5: your own household, you know, right, family traditions.
Speaker 1: East your grocery is one of our favorite Sunday Wire
Speaker 1: commenters is tradwive versus trad Stepford Wives. Now that's a
Speaker 1: that's a reality show I would watch right there. You should.
Speaker 1: You should definitely make that happen.
Speaker 5: That's what you can use AI for that. I approve.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, you've got our full approval for that
Speaker 1: one man. All right, data centers are next on my list, Ruckus.
Speaker 1: You were with us.
Speaker 5: When we do it. I take it back. We're not
Speaker 5: using AI. I didn't do it. We're not killing the planet.
Speaker 5: And I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Now, if you're using AI to make your show images,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, you're like sucking up all the
Speaker 1: water in town and using all the energy in town
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. But you and I and Sport
Speaker 1: were driving around and we saw a protest.
Speaker 5: Right you do mean in town? Literally?
Speaker 1: Yeah, quite literally here in central Texas, Pharaoh. So we
Speaker 1: were driving around and we saw people on street corner
Speaker 1: protesting data centers coming to town, and we all found
Speaker 1: that very interesting. Are you seeing that in Tennessee, Pharaoh?
Speaker 4: Yes, And there's actually some legislation that is floating around
Speaker 4: to and some cities to actually regulate data centers and
Speaker 4: put like constraints to prevent them from just coming in
Speaker 4: anywhere and just installing one. So some environmental constraint around
Speaker 4: like resources consumption, noise level, which is gonna make it
Speaker 4: impossible for them to build it once they put this,
Speaker 4: which is a good thing, right, that's I think that's
Speaker 4: what people want. But I think in generally do it anyway?
Speaker 5: Huh, don't they just go ahead and figure out a
Speaker 5: way to do it anyway?
Speaker 4: Who knows? Who knows?
Speaker 1: Well, that's why I asked, because that's what that's the
Speaker 1: big question on everyone's mind.
Speaker 4: Well, this is what they are trying to say. Hey,
Speaker 4: they are just gonna go to court and they're gonna
Speaker 4: you know, yeah, it's the same way they are selling
Speaker 4: they are selling to use AI, to accept it as
Speaker 4: is without being a voice to talk about it and
Speaker 4: actually how to adopt it on what's not right that Hey,
Speaker 4: just take it as is and this is how we're
Speaker 4: gonna give it to you. Same thing they are trying
Speaker 4: to do with Data Center. I think part of this
Speaker 4: is a narrative that you know, it's not worth it
Speaker 4: for you to fight because they're just gonna go to
Speaker 4: court and they're gonna spend so much money and they're
Speaker 4: gonna win it. Then you know what, fuck you, I
Speaker 4: have some elected official. We're gonna put pressure on them
Speaker 4: to put whatever the hell they need to do, and
Speaker 4: let's just fight it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm finding the whole thing very interesting, especially like
Speaker 1: we've showed on the show over the last couple of weeks,
Speaker 1: the numbers of them that are being introduced, the numbers
Speaker 1: that are proposed, the numbers that are already in place. Ohio, Texas,
Speaker 1: Virginia top of the list. Texas is number one, Virginia's
Speaker 1: number two. I believe Ohio's number three, and looking to
Speaker 1: maybe gain spot one or two. And there's a torrent
Speaker 1: of you know, panic in communities and online about this,
Speaker 1: and I'm you know, I have reported on Chinese battery
Speaker 1: factories being set up in small communities, for example, and
Speaker 1: talk to people that you know, told me, hey, this
Speaker 1: is how it affected my water, this is how it
Speaker 1: affected my power. I know these things affect people, right.
Speaker 1: But now it's in our town, Ruckus and we see
Speaker 1: the protesters, and you know, I'm interested. And then I
Speaker 1: see a message from our mayor pop into my email
Speaker 1: and I thought, Okay, what does the mayor have to say?
Speaker 1: Because the mayor and the city council. I think are
Speaker 1: probably the people that have the toughest decision, if you will.
Speaker 1: I hope it's a tough decision for them, and I
Speaker 1: hope they're really looking at everybody. He's concerns and the opportunities.
Speaker 1: But it's like I thought, well, okay, well we have
Speaker 1: protesters in town here, I host a show that you
Speaker 1: know arguably protests this kind of stuff. I want to
Speaker 1: know what the mayor has to say, because I mean,
Speaker 1: we hang out in a place where our mayor hangs out.
Speaker 1: Like I've seen this guy, I've sat next to him.
Speaker 1: I'm like, okay, people like him here. What is he saying?
Speaker 1: So he notes the community concerns first off, and I'm
Speaker 1: not going to like read it in its full entirety here,
Speaker 1: but he notes the community is concerned about water usage
Speaker 1: and availability. He notes that the community is concerned about
Speaker 1: electricity usage, noise and traffic concerns, environmental impacts, and tax revenue.
Speaker 1: And it's interesting some of the stuff that he says.
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example, like water usage and availability.
Speaker 1: That's one of the things that like most of us
Speaker 1: are probably concerned about. Right, is this gonna make my
Speaker 1: water bill go up. Are they gonna drain any reservoirs? Sorry, California,
Speaker 1: You're already drained. But are they going to drain any
Speaker 1: reservoirs near me? This kind of stuff, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's practical shit, right. So here's what he says. There
Speaker 1: have been concerns about water consumption. The truth is that
Speaker 1: older data centers did require large amounts of water due
Speaker 1: to outdated cooling systems. However, the facilities being proposed and
Speaker 1: built here will use the most advanced closed loop cooling
Speaker 1: technology available today. Our town's long standing surface water rights,
Speaker 1: along with our contracted supplies, total over forty three thousand
Speaker 1: acre feet per year. The city uses an average of
Speaker 1: approximately eighteen million gallons per day or about twenty thousand
Speaker 1: acre feet per year. Recent peak day usage has been
Speaker 1: around thirty three million gals les. The initial charge for
Speaker 1: the data center system is anticipated to be approximately two
Speaker 1: million gallons total, to be circulated for ten to twelve years.
Speaker 1: That means the long term operational demand of these facilities
Speaker 1: is a fraction of the over of our overall system capacity.
Speaker 1: The intake of the two million gallon two million gallon
Speaker 1: charge will be coordinated with the city, so it does
Speaker 1: not interfere with fire protection, pressure tank levels, or the
Speaker 1: integrity of the water system. Separately, the data center requires
Speaker 1: a domestic daily water use. The average use in our
Speaker 1: town uses. An average home in our town uses approximately
Speaker 1: two hundred and forty gallons a day. That's crazy, and
Speaker 1: a typical sit down restaurant can use roughly seven thousand
Speaker 1: gallons per day or more. Domestic use by the data
Speaker 1: center is contractually limited to four thousand gallons per day,
Speaker 1: and the city has the ability to require the mechanical
Speaker 1: limiting devices to ensure compliance. This is monitored, structured, and
Speaker 1: enforceable by contract. That's just the water part. So I
Speaker 1: gotta say, shouts out to our mayor, I hope what
Speaker 1: you're saying is true. If what you're saying is true,
Speaker 1: maybe that would change the discussion and the skepticism around
Speaker 1: these data centers. But I can see Ruckus recoiling already,
Speaker 1: and I can see the audience gearing up the black
Speaker 1: pill cannons to launch right now. So but I did
Speaker 1: appreciate sort of the discussion opener there, because at this point,
Speaker 1: you know, if I hadn't read all that, I would
Speaker 1: have been like the person on the corner with the
Speaker 1: science saying no, fuck your data centers, we don't want
Speaker 1: them here. I still probably am that person. But what
Speaker 1: do you think, ruckus, since you live here, what do
Speaker 1: you think about the picture?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 5: You either stand out on the corner in a box
Speaker 5: on purpose now or you live inside of a box
Speaker 5: out on the corner against your willier later. No I don't.
Speaker 5: I'm like, oh, I'm starting to get this. One of
Speaker 5: the first things I wanted to address was kind of
Speaker 5: to myself, because I know I was mentioning the state's
Speaker 5: rights thing, but Trump kind of like front ran all
Speaker 5: of that when it came to the AI stuff, And
Speaker 5: I wonder how the data centers play into that if
Speaker 5: it's considered some sort of critical infrastructure for the sake
Speaker 5: of national security, which is why the federal government is
Speaker 5: in one hundred percent control of all decisions and the
Speaker 5: states can't decide their own thing. So I'm like, I've
Speaker 5: been wondering, is that and you know, is there going
Speaker 5: to be some conflict there are the state's going to
Speaker 5: try to do the right thing and the federal government's
Speaker 5: going to step in. I think I'm already past that.
Speaker 5: I think I see what's happening here. This is a
Speaker 5: problem reaction solution happening very quickly and in real time.
Speaker 5: And I was like, this makes sense now. It's very
Speaker 5: a Hegelian thing that's happening here. It's like they've got everybody.
Speaker 5: I mean, it's like everywhere. It's like you could probably
Speaker 5: find this instance in every city. I was shocked to
Speaker 5: see it in the town that we live in because
Speaker 5: it's not like a huge It's not like it was
Speaker 5: where I was in Albuquerque. You know, I would expect
Speaker 5: you there's people walking around wearing signs, ringing bells, the
Speaker 5: end of the world already, you know that kind of thing.
Speaker 5: But like to see people for this is a big
Speaker 5: deal and it's allowed to be a big deal. People
Speaker 5: are like, we didn't see that during the pandemic, did we.
Speaker 5: People weren't out there protest and wearing boxes and the like.
Speaker 5: Why are we allowed to fight and argue about this
Speaker 5: and say, oh, you're killing the environment too much water,
Speaker 5: too many resources, And then all of a sudden, Oh,
Speaker 5: don't worry about it, because the technology already exists to
Speaker 5: address a lot of your concerns, which could just be
Speaker 5: created concerns when the ideal concern should be. I'm like, so, okay,
Speaker 5: so maybe we're not going to put a million data
Speaker 5: centers in around the country. We're only going to put
Speaker 5: one hundred thousand. Oh, that's much better. But to go
Speaker 5: from zero to one hundred thousand data centers, which are
Speaker 5: ultimately just going to be you to you know, this
Speaker 5: is the infrastructure of the total technogratic surveillance grid. This
Speaker 5: is not for the AI, This is for our prison system.
Speaker 5: This is for our future ubi income social credit blockchain
Speaker 5: hellscape that we are diving headlong into whenever they decide
Speaker 5: to fully disco close the UFOs, I guess, but do
Speaker 5: you see what I'm saying. It seems like we're allowed
Speaker 5: to argue about these things and they're going to give
Speaker 5: us some wins when ultimately we all lose because they're
Speaker 5: still building these stupid effing data centers. You see what
Speaker 5: I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Yeah, ultimately we're all still exposed. Ultimately, the goalpost may move. Ultimately.
Speaker 1: I like to think that whoever elected our mayor here
Speaker 1: in this town elected a smart guy and that he's
Speaker 1: actually been pitched what he's preaching. But I would caution
Speaker 1: him that, hey, these goalposts are going to move really quick. Dude.
Speaker 1: We're seeing reports from people in other towns that are
Speaker 1: saying they're literally having migraines and headaches and they can't
Speaker 1: sleep at night because they're hearing low pitch hums and
Speaker 1: all kinds of weird shit in their town after some
Speaker 1: of this shit has been built.
Speaker 5: You know, we got that going on in this town
Speaker 5: before that shit's been anyway.
Speaker 1: Right, I mean there are people a couple of towns
Speaker 1: over here in central Texas where they built a TESLA
Speaker 1: testing center who say their town is wrecked, like they
Speaker 1: want to sell their houses now, some of them because
Speaker 1: of all the noise, in the rumbling and just the disruptive,
Speaker 1: technocratic hum coming out of that facility. Pharaoh, what do
Speaker 1: you think, man? What do you think about our mayor's
Speaker 1: pitch to the public. What do you think about you know,
Speaker 1: the data centers in general? Do you think because I,
Speaker 1: you know, as much as I am skeptical of what
Speaker 1: our mayor said, I at least really appreciated the whole,
Speaker 1: like his perspective thing and in his perspective, if he
Speaker 1: was correct and if he's been given good information, that
Speaker 1: data center is not going to use more water than
Speaker 1: a local restaurant, and we've got lots of local restaurants.
Speaker 1: I have a hard time believing this, But if you know,
Speaker 1: maybe that's possible. What do you think about this closed
Speaker 1: loop cooling and all these claims?
Speaker 4: To be honest, I'm not I'm not familiar with the
Speaker 4: closed loop cooling and I have not looked into that.
Speaker 4: I know about the water consumption.
Speaker 1: Right, bad reports overall?
Speaker 4: Right, correct? Correct, that's actually you know, the point is
Speaker 4: not that. The number one is how are they going
Speaker 4: to power it? That's my number one question, right because
Speaker 4: every city where they established one of those that are
Speaker 4: increasing utility costs period, That is a fact. Right now,
Speaker 4: you seek correlation of utilities versus data center creation, and
Speaker 4: they sell it to you to basically saying that now
Speaker 4: they are trying to build nuclear power around data center, right,
Speaker 4: nuclear plants around data centers. The question is how are
Speaker 4: they going to cool those nuclear plants? What's the environmental impact?
Speaker 4: I know nuclear plants right now they are safer than
Speaker 4: what they used to be, right, But for you to
Speaker 4: power that then there might be other systems needed that
Speaker 4: will still consume water. Right, And his email or his
Speaker 4: letter does not addressat right, So you cannot take that
Speaker 4: in isolation. I think you have to look at it
Speaker 4: from more of like holistic perspective of what is really
Speaker 4: the impact on the entire utilities, what is accessories to
Speaker 4: this data center, what requirements does it need, and what
Speaker 4: is the impact of those requirements on the resources themself. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: I'm not buying that bullshit.
Speaker 1: I totally agree, man. And just to play Devil's advocate
Speaker 1: as a good citizen here on behalf of my elected
Speaker 1: mayor who I did not vote for, not that I
Speaker 1: voted against, I just don't because it's bullshit anyway. I
Speaker 1: only use the water as an example. He has a
Speaker 1: paragraph about electricity use, and he goes through all that,
Speaker 1: and he's got one about noise and traffic concerns and
Speaker 1: environmental impacts. And my thing is like, Okay, maybe if
Speaker 1: that was if it was just our town that was
Speaker 1: getting one of these, that would be the case. But
Speaker 1: what happens when there's three hundred and thirty three other
Speaker 1: of these locations in Texas? I did that for you, ruckus.
Speaker 1: You're welcome, and they have to start offsetting each other,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? And stuff starts bouncing around
Speaker 1: and corporations start going, oh, well, you know this has
Speaker 1: to happen because these are now mission critical, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. It's just like I feel like there's
Speaker 1: a scope creep that could happen here and is probably
Speaker 1: a feature, not a bug. And this is a really
Speaker 1: slick way for corporations and the Trump administration and our
Speaker 1: senators and congress people to be sold on, Oh well,
Speaker 1: we've got this new closed loop la la la la.
Speaker 1: What the fuck are you talking about? New closed loop
Speaker 1: la la la? Like no one even understands what a
Speaker 1: data center is at this point for the most part,
Speaker 1: And you're selling our elected politicians on closed loop cooling
Speaker 1: technology because it's gotten better in the last three years
Speaker 1: or whatever. Like, I don't know. I just I feel
Speaker 1: like a lot of people would read that and go, cool,
Speaker 1: my Mayor's got us covered. I'm not concerned about it.
Speaker 1: It's not going to suck more water than than my
Speaker 1: local restaurant, and it's not going to suck more energy
Speaker 1: than you know, my house or my business. Like, I
Speaker 1: don't know, man, I'm skeptical of the whole thing. Lip service, right,
Speaker 1: Like it's really easy lip service to sell to a
Speaker 1: current politician when you to go with it, you've got
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars to dump into the community.
Speaker 1: I mean, I would not want to be the politician
Speaker 1: that has to say no, we don't want your tens
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars in our slowly developing town here,
Speaker 1: because you know, freedom, Like that's a pretty hard sell
Speaker 1: when you're sitting there looking at all the business owners
Speaker 1: and you know the townspeople, and it's like, that's what
Speaker 1: you're trying to sell.
Speaker 5: The data centers are the new jibby jabs, perhaps will
Speaker 5: solve all of these problems that the aliens will offer
Speaker 5: us some of their exotic technolology and why wondrous magical
Speaker 5: technologies that they've got for you know, computer chips and stuff, right, yeah,
Speaker 5: lithium crystals or something, right.
Speaker 1: Oh, interdimensional Aliens, could you please come out of the
Speaker 1: portal and please speed read the Epstein files for us
Speaker 1: at this New York Art Exchange thing. Could you get
Speaker 1: an appointment there and speed read that for us and
Speaker 1: give us the fucking theme and the gist and the
Speaker 1: cliff notes version. We'd really appreciate that. And then if
Speaker 1: you could speed read all these emails that you know,
Speaker 1: various mayors are getting around the United States to get
Speaker 1: them to install these data centers, you know, and tell
Speaker 1: us what we should do. We would really appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Maybe you could, maybe you interdimensional portal hopping aliens could
Speaker 1: also help us like redistrict all our voting areas so
Speaker 1: that like we actually have representation or you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know, just some thoughts for the space brothers out there,
Speaker 1: since we're going to disclose all this shit.
Speaker 5: I also have a question for the space brethren. What
Speaker 5: the hell is this?
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, let me put it on.
Speaker 5: Or did the space aliens already arrive? Did? What the
Speaker 5: hell am I looking at?
Speaker 1: The hell is that? Is that that black guy pretending
Speaker 1: to be Erica Kirk with his name.
Speaker 5: That's the one on the left is actually a guy.
Speaker 5: By the way, of course, the one on the right
Speaker 5: is actually a female, not any female, but that's actually
Speaker 5: Heidi Klum. If you can believe that.
Speaker 1: It was Erica Kirk, what do you mean?
Speaker 5: Yeah, but yeah, we had the met Gala. They do
Speaker 5: this weird thing. They Yeah, they do very weird, very
Speaker 5: weird things. If you want to see all of that stuff,
Speaker 5: I encourage you to check out the weaponized news that
Speaker 5: I did with Sam Cheney last night. We went through
Speaker 5: a number of them. But those rich people are weird
Speaker 5: and they have way too much free time on their hands, hesher,
Speaker 5: which is probably why when they're not doing the met
Speaker 5: Gala thing, they're out there or releasing like genetically modified
Speaker 5: mosquitoes on the world or something, right, yeah, or.
Speaker 1: Figuring out how to put blood in the shoes of
Speaker 1: a rapper or something.
Speaker 5: You just never know, But can you be can you
Speaker 5: imagine the I mean, look around the world and that
Speaker 5: thing that I just flashed on the screen there and
Speaker 5: all the things that we're dealing with. Is this really
Speaker 5: the best time for the aliens to come? I think
Speaker 5: it'd be like, yo, yeah, you guys are kind of
Speaker 5: busy with your own thing right now. We'll come back later.
Speaker 1: Do you think that the space bros have like their
Speaker 1: own fashion sense, because like the aliens they've given us
Speaker 1: in all of the sci fi have been very naked,
Speaker 1: and I'm just curious, like some of them have had,
Speaker 1: you know, been festooned and with fine regalia, you know,
Speaker 1: like Mars attacks, Like.
Speaker 5: The leaders looked a lot like Natasha Henstrich.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, like the leaders from Mars attacks. I mean
Speaker 1: they were fly. They were like you know, Rick James
Speaker 1: and shit, they had rhinestones and all the red sparkly
Speaker 1: stuff Like I don't know, I'm just worried that the
Speaker 1: space Bros Will pop out of the portal and be like,
Speaker 1: you know, what if that's you guys, Like what if
Speaker 1: the Space Bros pop out of the portal and they're
Speaker 1: looking fly, you know, like like the Mars attacks leader
Speaker 1: you got the you know, all that stuff, and they're
Speaker 1: looking at our met gala and they're like, what the
Speaker 1: fuck you got like obese people dressing up like their
Speaker 1: stone figures or something like am I on the corner
Speaker 1: of fucking Hollywood Avenue? Like what is this crap? We're
Speaker 1: out of here. We're not gonna speed read your Epstein files.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna save you guys from your fucked up
Speaker 1: non proliferation agreements that you're all breaking right now. We're
Speaker 1: not gonna do shit for you guys. You can't even
Speaker 1: figure out how fucking dress.
Speaker 5: And good luck explaining Telldildonix to the aliens.
Speaker 1: An automoblow good luck, I mean, Space Bros. If if
Speaker 1: you really are here, if you popped out of the portal.
Speaker 1: I recommend you turn off all media and just watch
Speaker 1: the last eleven years of Boiler Room. I mean, you'll
Speaker 1: probably learn more about society than anywhere else if you
Speaker 1: just do that, Like, just don't don't do the other stuff.
Speaker 1: It's not going to work out.
Speaker 5: By the way, before we straight too far away from
Speaker 5: that thing we were talking about with the data centers.
Speaker 5: I found this very interesting. I'm going to drop you
Speaker 5: the link here in just a second, but i'll flash
Speaker 5: it on the screen while i'm doing that. Somebody has
Speaker 5: come up with a very interesting solution for this problem already.
Speaker 5: Allegedly they want to start doing something involving the ocean
Speaker 5: for these computer chips. This is called panther lassa, which
Speaker 5: is definitely a play on words here. But these things
Speaker 5: they're like an AI node. It's this big. They look
Speaker 5: like big golf balls floating in the ocean. I don't
Speaker 5: know if the picture is here. Yeah they are so yeah,
Speaker 5: so they just float. They look like a mine, don't
Speaker 5: they look like one of those minds?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 5: But this, yeah, so they're going to just float there
Speaker 5: out in the ocean, and these nodes or for the
Speaker 5: this is going to they could they could replace traditional
Speaker 5: data centers? Right, but again, what do this is going
Speaker 5: to be a humming, big white ball floating in the ocean.
Speaker 5: What is that going to do for the marine life? Everybody?
Speaker 5: Did we stop and consider that? Are we just going
Speaker 5: to roll right ahead with this? Because as the headline
Speaker 5: there said, Silicon Valley is going to drop two hundred
Speaker 5: million dollars on this idea. And this is just one
Speaker 5: of many ideas we've seen ideas where they want to
Speaker 5: build these in space. China's building them under the on
Speaker 5: the seabed floor, underneath the ocean because it's cool. You know,
Speaker 5: It's just like how many of these types it's just
Speaker 5: a giant it's so many black holes for the money
Speaker 5: to go that nobody knows what's really going on and
Speaker 5: what's really being built. And we've seen this happen so
Speaker 5: many times, haven't we?
Speaker 1: Uh? Yeah, yeah, absolutely, I mean this is this idea
Speaker 1: of floating chips in the sea.
Speaker 4: It was with servers. I mean, Gogle has been doing
Speaker 4: this for a long time. So I don't know, to
Speaker 4: your point, I don't really know why is it cannot
Speaker 4: expand the.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they've also proposed floating prisons and stuff like that. So,
Speaker 1: you know, and I assume they're already out there. We've
Speaker 1: already seen them in movies, so I assume they're black
Speaker 1: site locations that are.
Speaker 5: Oh I sort of got If my FEMA camp is
Speaker 5: inside of a floating sphere in the middle of the ocean,
Speaker 5: I'm gonna be so pissed.
Speaker 1: Oh dude, I'm just gonna jump off. I just I'm
Speaker 1: gonna jump off and swim with the sharks instead. We
Speaker 1: got this one. Also, I will note along with this
Speaker 1: headline is out of ABC two k KUTV. Headline is
Speaker 1: state authority claims massive data center will benefit Utah military installations. Utah,
Speaker 1: people of Utah, what's going on? You're the state that
Speaker 1: has housed the enormous NSA data surveillance warehouse, un constitutional
Speaker 1: data surveillance warehouse all these years what used to be
Speaker 1: the biggest IT installment in the country, and now you're
Speaker 1: gonna be I don't know how we put it on
Speaker 1: the Richter scale of largeness of data centers, but now,
Speaker 1: according to ABC two KUTV, massive data center will benefit
Speaker 1: Utah military installations. Okay, can we have more than a headline? Guys?
Speaker 1: What does that mean? KUTV. What does that mean? Like,
Speaker 1: what particular benefit do Utah's military installations get from a
Speaker 1: massive AI data center? Just curious.
Speaker 5: You're on a need to know basis, sir, and you
Speaker 5: don't need to know.
Speaker 1: Asking for our social reject friends in Utah. But yeah,
Speaker 1: apparently we don't need to know. And it just it benefits,
Speaker 1: all right, It benefits military installations. That's all you need
Speaker 1: to know. You need to trust that it benefits military installations,
Speaker 1: all right. It's like the Big Bang theory. You just
Speaker 1: got to trust it. There's this piece of it, the
Speaker 1: central piece, which is what I was getting at earlier
Speaker 1: when I lost my train of thought. You have to
Speaker 1: have faith in that actual sub second, sub millisecond of
Speaker 1: an explosion. You science folks, us science folks have to
Speaker 1: have faith that that happened. Is that any weirder than
Speaker 1: having faith in a creator? I would have told you
Speaker 1: it was years ago, but these days, no, it's like
Speaker 1: kind of weirder. It's maybe weirder. And I'm a skeptic,
Speaker 1: so you know, take it for what word.
Speaker 5: George Michaels taught us you got to have faith?
Speaker 1: What I thought that was Fred Durst, Oh crap, never mind.
Speaker 5: We we're racing a generation of faith no more.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and olympus, I'm careless whisper. Oh snap, oh, let's
Speaker 1: not all right. Okay, we're we're you know, we're getting
Speaker 1: into it here. Let's let's round it out. Let me
Speaker 1: go across the room here. I have one more topic,
Speaker 1: so if you guys want to hang for the final
Speaker 1: topic I have. It's actually one of ruckuses that I'm
Speaker 1: going to bring in. But Pharaoh, what about you?
Speaker 5: Man n then?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Pharaoh, anything we've missed this week that you wanted
Speaker 1: to make sure that was happening in the boilerroom before
Speaker 1: you fade out.
Speaker 4: I actually I would love to hang out more, but
Speaker 4: I'm really fading.
Speaker 1: Out, all right. All right, Well, well we'll let you
Speaker 1: jump out of here. I'll just tell you this. I'll
Speaker 1: tease it so Rucus can respond to it on the
Speaker 1: way out. The I R S gave a tax i
Speaker 1: d to an AI that legally owns its own US company.
Speaker 1: So you know that means some things. That has some
Speaker 1: ramifications of any comments on that before you bail out.
Speaker 4: Um, wow, so interesting.
Speaker 1: So that means okay, so correct me if I'm wrong here, Pharaoh.
Speaker 1: But I think I might have to agree with the
Speaker 1: original poster here the op which is at zero x
Speaker 1: sweep on x AI. Agents will soon make more transactions
Speaker 1: on the Internet than humans. Said, agents will make a
Speaker 1: million times more crypto payments than people ever did. And
Speaker 1: a piece of software now legally owns a company, holds
Speaker 1: a US bank account, controls a crypto wallet, and posts
Speaker 1: on Twitter.
Speaker 5: M all by itself.
Speaker 4: That is, that's even legally possible.
Speaker 1: Apparently it's done for the I R s. It is
Speaker 1: now a precedent.
Speaker 4: M So are they going to just hey, I was
Speaker 4: going to pay taxes and we're don't have to pay
Speaker 4: tax Dude.
Speaker 1: The A is going to do better at paying taxes
Speaker 1: than the three of us.
Speaker 4: That he's actually better in paying taxes than I am.
Speaker 4: That's the jobs to give it to.
Speaker 5: What this means pharaohs Ideally, Ultimately, what they're the tech
Speaker 5: bros would like to see is that we all stop working, right.
Speaker 5: It's it's the agents that do all the work. So
Speaker 5: the only movement of money as we know what, the
Speaker 5: economy is no longer involving human beings. The concept of
Speaker 5: ownership right of a company, So surels fucking awesome I
Speaker 5: don't have to pay taxes anymore, sign me up. No,
Speaker 5: you just that's the trade off is much worse. Now
Speaker 5: you've moved into the universal basic income. You have to
Speaker 5: do exactly what we say. I mean, it sounds ridiculous,
Speaker 5: but if the government says you have to change the
Speaker 5: sex of your child or you don't get your unity,
Speaker 5: that's the system that you're going to have to be
Speaker 5: living in now. Yeah, I'd rather pay taxes, dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's a sad day when we have to
Speaker 1: like read a headline and go, yeah, I'd rather pay taxes.
Speaker 4: I rather not pay taxes. But my actually, that's a
Speaker 4: good point, right, because the counter argument to the whole
Speaker 4: AI is going to take all the jobs is they
Speaker 4: cannot afford that, right, because if AI take all the jobs,
Speaker 4: humans just sitting at home, there is really no driver
Speaker 4: to the economy, right, because how are we going to
Speaker 4: get money.
Speaker 5: And justify the human being existence to the world elite
Speaker 5: who own everything they own. They're the ones that own
Speaker 5: the stock version, they own the tokenized version of these
Speaker 5: AI agents, so they have exposure to the income. We're fucked.
Speaker 4: I hate to say, no, no, no, no, I see
Speaker 4: it so that's why I'm I think it's a good
Speaker 4: angle actually to look at it this way, because that
Speaker 4: takes away, Hey, where are we getting driven in?
Speaker 5: From?
Speaker 4: Right? You get the human out of the government, Trivin
Speaker 4: new cycle.
Speaker 1: So who's the golden goose in the end, it's the
Speaker 1: same billionaires, Okay, not us.
Speaker 4: It's going to be trillionaires.
Speaker 1: I think it's not the plubs. The pluvs are not
Speaker 1: the golden goose.
Speaker 4: Not anybody other than those who's holding power.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this headline, if I can call it a headline, Uh.
Speaker 4: It's really interesting though, I would. And that's just it's
Speaker 4: gonna pay taxes here.
Speaker 1: I mean, AIS don't sleep people do, Okay? Those A hours?
Speaker 4: Is it going to get inductions? Who's who's who's who's
Speaker 4: actually the taxes?
Speaker 5: Can the AI donate some money to charity and then
Speaker 5: write it off?
Speaker 1: Well, it filed a Form S S four directly with
Speaker 1: the I R S. So I don't see why it can't, like,
Speaker 1: you know, do the normal grifts that you know, companies
Speaker 1: are going to.
Speaker 5: Become friends with this AI agent just in case they
Speaker 5: might want to donate something to alternate current radio.
Speaker 1: You never know, Yeah, man, I mean Clawbank. Clawbank is
Speaker 1: opening this up as a product, meaning anyone can now
Speaker 1: spin up an AI agent that legally owns a company,
Speaker 1: has its own bank account, and trades crypto autonomously. I
Speaker 1: mean you got a need for that? Clawbank got you covered.
Speaker 5: Just just one of many that are industries.
Speaker 1: I'm sure, absolutely amazing. All right, Pharaoh, we'll let you
Speaker 1: get out of here. Man.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I was going to say something, but actually, no,
Speaker 4: go for it.
Speaker 1: If if you got it anything I lost, all right, that's.
Speaker 4: All right, all right, thanks guys, and thank you for
Speaker 4: listening to us, and I'll see you next week. Cheers everybody.
Speaker 1: All Right, there it goes mystical Pharaoh, punching out ruckus.
Speaker 1: Did we forget anything? Do we have any leftover side
Speaker 1: house spread in the hole in our pockets?
Speaker 5: It's related to everything. Hold on, I don't have the
Speaker 5: article in front of me. Give me one second. Well
Speaker 5: I just might have to let's see, just do it
Speaker 5: for memory. But you might have heard about something called
Speaker 5: Google nano. Yeah, it's a four gigabytes here it is.
Speaker 5: I found it. Ah haaa, here you go. Google Chrome
Speaker 5: may have Yeah, they most likely did quietly without your permission.
Speaker 5: I have that part installed a four gigabyte AI model
Speaker 5: onto your device. So this was making the rounds. So
Speaker 5: it might be on your computer, it might be on
Speaker 5: your phone. But basically what happened is this is inside
Speaker 5: Google Chrome. Who has been They call it quietly installing
Speaker 5: this four gigabyte four gigabytes of space onto your device
Speaker 5: without asking or notifying you. Okay, so, and what this
Speaker 5: is is this is to help power their AI mode feature.
Speaker 5: You've probably seen this stupid thing. I was showing you
Speaker 5: some of that on my phone the other day. Hashure
Speaker 5: where I get these notifications on my Samsung phone, sometimes
Speaker 5: from the Samsung News app, and then Google also sends
Speaker 5: me news links, so I get a Google notification. But
Speaker 5: what Google started doing I noticed it a couple months
Speaker 5: ago is I'll get a notification that looks like it's
Speaker 5: a Google News thing, and then I click on it
Speaker 5: and expecting to see all the lists of the news
Speaker 5: about that subject. And what it takes me to instead
Speaker 5: is it now pre fills with the thing that I
Speaker 5: saw up above what I thought was a news headline.
Speaker 5: What it copies and pastes that thing as an a
Speaker 5: ask AI this question and it gives me the results
Speaker 5: I'm just like, what what am I looking at? Like,
Speaker 5: I didn't go to the AI chat and ask it
Speaker 5: about this. It's feeding me this. It's the strangest effing thing.
Speaker 5: So these AI mode summary things that you're seeing everywhere,
Speaker 5: uh that they're they're using the power of your device
Speaker 5: and your computer and your computer chip. And I don't
Speaker 5: know how all this works, heshure you do. Uh, So
Speaker 5: they're slowing down your computer and all this garbage. But again,
Speaker 5: they didn't tell anybody that they were doing this, And
Speaker 5: generally you're supposed to tell people and or get their
Speaker 5: permission before you start like utilizing their personal property, their resources,
Speaker 5: their electricity, their their gigabytes, their bandwidth, et cetera. Yeah,
Speaker 5: this is a no no, right, So they got in
Speaker 5: big trouble for this, but not big enough. I think
Speaker 5: it plays into everything. So it's like the the whatever
Speaker 5: this is, it's gonna it's gonna happen with or without
Speaker 5: a permission, you know what I mean, and without us
Speaker 5: knowing for the most part.
Speaker 1: And the and the trojan horses get bigger and bigger
Speaker 1: and bigger. It's like you go get a new iPhone
Speaker 1: now or a new Samsung or whatever. Like the the
Speaker 1: base models like two hundred and fifty six gigabytes. So
Speaker 1: you know, these critters and creatures in Silicon Valley, they figure, well, crap,
Speaker 1: that's like not very four gigabytes. You know, five years
Speaker 1: ago would have sounded like an immense amount of storage,
Speaker 1: But now we can sneak four gigabytes on eighty nine
Speaker 1: percent of user's phones and they won't even notice.
Speaker 5: I have like some USB sticks in my desk jewery here.
Speaker 5: I can't reach them right now because of my microphone's
Speaker 5: in the way. But I mean like I'd have to
Speaker 5: grab like a handful of those things to make up
Speaker 5: four gigabytes, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: Right, I've got I've got a stack of ZIP drives
Speaker 1: somewhere that would make up like a tiny percentage of that.
Speaker 5: You know, I'm gonna Apple two E computers if you
Speaker 5: have to stack from here to the moon, nothing.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, I use Linux, good call. Yeah, definitely, if
Speaker 1: you don't mind doing all the weird little updates ands.
Speaker 5: And if you don't mind the fact that the new
Speaker 5: AI model for anthropic mythlos allegedly has already busted Linton.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's always those scare tactics as well.
Speaker 5: All right, Roc, I think that was the last thing
Speaker 5: on my thing. I don't have it in front of me,
Speaker 5: but I encourage folks to go find it for themselves
Speaker 5: and check it out. Richard Dawkins, a very well known atheist,
Speaker 5: had a lengthy conversation experiment slash what I interpreted as
Speaker 5: almost a love affair with an AI agent, and he
Speaker 5: wrote all about it on like a medium substack blog.
Speaker 5: I don't even remember what unheard. I think it's called
Speaker 5: I don't remember, but it's out there. Search Richard Dawkins
Speaker 5: AI chat. It's a long read, it's crazy, it's fascinating,
Speaker 5: and I encourage you to check it out because, as
Speaker 5: I said earlier, read everything, listen to everybody, but don't
Speaker 5: believe anything unless you prove it for yourself using your
Speaker 5: own research. Thank you for having me, Hesher. I'm out of.
Speaker 1: Here, all right. Thanks ruckas a good shout on Dawkins there.
Speaker 1: Randy j was supposed to join us tonight. I know
Speaker 1: that Richard Dawkins is one of Randy Jay's only go
Speaker 1: to people remaining when it comes to some of the
Speaker 1: things we've talked about tonight, so I'll be checking that
Speaker 1: out for sure and bouncing it off Randy J, who
Speaker 1: hopefully will join us next week. M boy, what else
Speaker 1: can we say? I mean so much going on this week.
Speaker 1: We covered a lot tonight, So as we close out
Speaker 1: another episode of Boiler Room here, maybe the most important
Speaker 1: thing to remember is this, in times of uncertainty, the
Speaker 1: battle is not just over territory, right, or resources or
Speaker 1: elections war for territory, for my sepulteur of fans, it's
Speaker 1: actually over perception. It's over attention, it's over emotional energy,
Speaker 1: It's over your ability to distinguish reality from theater. Because
Speaker 1: when institutions lose credibility, they don't simply surrender power. They
Speaker 1: compensate with spectacle distraction, fear, managed outrage, and right now,
Speaker 1: people everywhere can feel that noise, intensifying economic instability, escalating wars, genocide,
Speaker 1: ethnic cleansing, political contradictions, technological transformation, AI systems, entering human institutions.
Speaker 1: Right just covered that disclosure narrative surfacing at carefully convenient
Speaker 1: moments like this week. It creates an environment where people
Speaker 1: become overwhelmed, exhausted, divided, and easier to steer. That's why
Speaker 1: remaining grounded matters now more than ever. So stay calm,
Speaker 1: stay observant, stay skeptical of emotional manipulation, in particular, even
Speaker 1: when it comes wrapped in narratives you want to believe
Speaker 1: and remember. Real freedom begins when people stop outsourcing their
Speaker 1: perception of reality to institutions that repeatedly betray public trust.
Speaker 1: The narrative containment breach is already happening. The only question
Speaker 1: now is what comes through the cracks next. We appreciate
Speaker 1: all of you for joining us tonight. This has been
Speaker 1: the boiler room. We'll see you next time.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 9: Go ahead and run, run home and cry to mama