Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I hope you're enjoying this because you ever earned it, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you kind of share my worldview. Nobody
Speaker 1: agrees on everything, right, but if you kind of share
Speaker 1: my worldview, you want to see Donald Trump win again.
Speaker 1: You feel that the legal system has been abused and
Speaker 1: misused to try to persecute him and jail him because
Speaker 1: they couldn't beat him at the polls, and all these
Speaker 1: things we talk about every day. This has to be
Speaker 1: one of the best times of your life, at least
Speaker 1: to the extent that world events politics can affect your
Speaker 1: enjoyment of life. I don't know how it ever gets
Speaker 1: any better than this. Eight five to five for zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five takes d an five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. Obviously, on election night, right, the deal
Speaker 1: gets closed and Trump wins, and then yeah, it gets better.
Speaker 1: There's going to be that tremendous moment and all of
Speaker 1: the wonderful things to follow. But right now down the stretch,
Speaker 1: I think it's exactly what we predicted, and it's going
Speaker 1: to be amazing each and every day as the left
Speaker 1: right faces this reality that it is likely about to lose,
Speaker 1: and then it gets into this spin cycle, right that,
Speaker 1: this just cycle right on down the toilet where where
Speaker 1: it just gets more and more crazy, which means it's
Speaker 1: likely to lose even bigger and bigger and get exposed
Speaker 1: in the process for being what the modern Democratic Party
Speaker 1: has become. And the more that gets exposed, well, then
Speaker 1: the fewer people are going to vote for that Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: You'll have more Democrats leave because I'll say, wow, I
Speaker 1: have no idea it had become this, and then folks
Speaker 1: who lean Democrat but aren't registered saying I don't want
Speaker 1: any part of that. So we're just in one of
Speaker 1: those kind of magic moments right now. Nothing guaranteed, but
Speaker 1: every reason to be very confident and optimistic. Hid five
Speaker 1: five four zero, five eight two five to five of
Speaker 1: the number texts d an five seven seven three nine
Speaker 1: and where do you want to start today? In terms
Speaker 1: of headlines that'll put an enormous smile on your face,
Speaker 1: perhaps a smile so big it's dangerous if you're driving.
Speaker 1: But it was a tough call for me. But I've
Speaker 1: got to start with the Washington Post not endorsing Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: right that, I mean a day full of good data
Speaker 1: from lots of different sources. That probably caps it all
Speaker 1: off because at that point you know why and you
Speaker 1: know why they're not endorsing her. And it goes back
Speaker 1: to what I've been telling you all along. There are
Speaker 1: many powerful people on the left who who view the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party as their own personal tool to accomplish the
Speaker 1: things they want. And they know she will be such
Speaker 1: a horrific president from day one that she will trash
Speaker 1: that brand and get them wiped out in twenty six
Speaker 1: and twenty eight. So the last thing they want is
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris as president. And I think what Jeff Bezos
Speaker 1: decides that the Washington Post is not endorsing her, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that pretty much confirms it. And oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: I mean, if Donald Trump really was Hitler, wouldn't the
Speaker 1: Washington Post be endorsing her? Sure seems like it so,
Speaker 1: and she'll really descend further into darkness tonight. Is what
Speaker 1: is she going to latch onto Okay, she's failing. She's losing.
Speaker 1: It's clear. So this desperate attempt to cling to power,
Speaker 1: what does she do tonight? She latches on to culture
Speaker 1: of death. Now she's going to bet it all, bet
Speaker 1: it all on. Hey, I will I will have more killed.
Speaker 1: I will have so many more babies killed if you
Speaker 1: elect me president. I mean, think about that moment wherein
Speaker 1: she's going to Texas tonight to do a thing with
Speaker 1: Beyonce where she will glorify this mass death. And that
Speaker 1: is I'm sorry, that's not religion, that's not philosophy. That's
Speaker 1: just truth and science. And if somebody has some other
Speaker 1: science book around and you want to call this and
Speaker 1: talk about it, give me a call. But that's what
Speaker 1: she's doing tonight. So the Party of Joy now is
Speaker 1: like become this one big desk star. By the way, Ryan,
Speaker 1: I'm wondering about the political calculus here because her official schedule.
Speaker 1: I don't know if she did something different today, but
Speaker 1: the official schedule, once again, there was nothing on her
Speaker 1: schedule until almost the end of the day. That's what
Speaker 1: I'm asking you about.
Speaker 3: Dan.
Speaker 4: You're kind of going there anyway, but she has some
Speaker 4: gaps in their schedule some days off here in the
Speaker 4: last two weeks. Why oh, why would she be going
Speaker 4: to Texas?
Speaker 1: Well, listen, you know it's not a play for her, right,
Speaker 1: you know my personal belief. By the way, let me
Speaker 1: address that separately, because you know, when President Trump, for example,
Speaker 1: he goes to New York on Sunday, he's really going
Speaker 1: to the swing States because these races are fought on
Speaker 1: television screens now right, So he may physically be in
Speaker 1: New York, but he's really campaigning in the swing States.
Speaker 1: And it's real smart because it's different. He's in New York. Wow,
Speaker 1: does he think he's going to win New York? Why
Speaker 1: is he in New York? And it's actually more likely
Speaker 1: to get attention across the swing States than if he
Speaker 1: went to one of the swing states. So conversely, for her, hey,
Speaker 1: I see the wisdom in going to Texas because it's
Speaker 1: not expected. So then you have people like you and
Speaker 1: me talking about why she going to Texas.
Speaker 4: So I get that part of it, But don't you
Speaker 4: get this part that Donald Trump feels it might be
Speaker 4: very important for him to have a mandate to win
Speaker 4: the national popular vote, and then if he cuts into
Speaker 4: the margin in New York, and there's a outside chance
Speaker 4: he might compete in New Jersey, which is right next door.
Speaker 4: I don't see you use that word, and I think
Speaker 4: it's the right word. The calculus of Kamala going to Texas,
Speaker 4: it doesn't make any sense on any level.
Speaker 1: I pla strategy. I absolutely agree with your point. And
Speaker 1: I've been tweeting on this Dan Caplis for a while
Speaker 1: now that it's very important for President Trump, who I
Speaker 1: believe and I've said it for a long time, is
Speaker 1: heading to victory that if that is true, that he
Speaker 1: gets the largest victory possible for the welfare of this
Speaker 1: nation for the first step in an effort to unify,
Speaker 1: for just straight political capital, all of that. And so
Speaker 1: RAN's absolutely right, you know, to the extent he can
Speaker 1: cut into or even win you know, the electoral college,
Speaker 1: pardon me, the popular vote nationally. Yeah, that is a
Speaker 1: nice step toward unity. So I get that, Ryan, I
Speaker 1: think that you can kill those two birds, though, because
Speaker 1: he's also going to get so much more attention to
Speaker 1: that New York rally because it's in New York, right,
Speaker 1: and that's going to help him in the swing states.
Speaker 1: But what's most intriguing to me is that so many
Speaker 1: of these days are starting so late for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: By the way, this rally tonight, I mean, you've got
Speaker 1: so many of these votes packed into the East coast
Speaker 1: or the Eastern time zone, and this rally tonight, which
Speaker 1: is her centerpiece, this glorification of abortion tonight, it doesn't
Speaker 1: start until doesn't start until nine thirty Eastern, and it's
Speaker 1: up against the World Series. So yeah, she obviously and
Speaker 1: she's admitted it. Right. She talked in one of her
Speaker 1: kind of podcast interviews about how she really likes her sleep,
Speaker 1: and I think she just it's it's one of the
Speaker 1: many different ways that her particular skill set is not
Speaker 1: geared toward being president. She just kind of lacks those
Speaker 1: basic skills and abilities. But that's what she's going to
Speaker 1: do tonight, and she's going to do it with Beyonce.
Speaker 1: And let's see how that works out. For eight five
Speaker 1: five for zero five eight two five five, the number
Speaker 1: takes d an five seven seven three nine. So we'll
Speaker 1: be talking about that some more so much today. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post decision not to endorse, which is really the
Speaker 1: Bezos decision. What do you think is behind it? You
Speaker 1: now have a number of Republican leaders coming out and
Speaker 1: openly saying that Kamala Harris's rhetoric is increasing the chance
Speaker 1: that President trump will be assassinated, and she's refusing to
Speaker 1: back off. So I just think this right now, this
Speaker 1: right now is the most dangerous time in Donald Trump's life.
Speaker 1: It's the most dangerous time in this nation's modern life
Speaker 1: in terms of the threat of an assassination, because just
Speaker 1: imagine what that would do to this nation. And I
Speaker 1: just hope that extraordinary security measures are being taken over
Speaker 1: the course of this what is it eleven days now, Ryan,
Speaker 1: I'm the first to admit my math has not been
Speaker 1: perfect when it comes to goes through eleven now and
Speaker 1: election day when and so Kamala Harris is a new
Speaker 1: theme today, which is that Trump is belittling the nation
Speaker 1: because he came out and said We've become a dumping
Speaker 1: ground and a garbage can for criminals from around the
Speaker 1: world because of our open border. Not not thinking that's
Speaker 1: going to work for her either. So we have some
Speaker 1: extraordinarily fun and compelling sound of people who normally would
Speaker 1: not support a Republican coming out and endorsing Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and then beyond that poll results. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: like poll result heaven today. If like you, like me,
Speaker 1: you want to see Donald Trump win eight five five
Speaker 1: for zero five eight two five five, the number takes
Speaker 1: d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcastin Harris.
Speaker 6: It isn't on trial here in the same way President
Speaker 6: Biden wasn't on.
Speaker 1: Trial when he was running.
Speaker 6: We are the American people are on trial. And if
Speaker 6: we choose, if an efficient number of us in a
Speaker 6: sufficient number of states choose to ignore the evidence that,
Speaker 6: as the Bible says, those with eyes to.
Speaker 1: See and ears to hear, Wait a second before we
Speaker 1: get to the rest of this from John Meacham. So
Speaker 1: he's quoting the Bible to tell people they need to
Speaker 1: pay they need to vote for a candidate whose core
Speaker 1: guiding principle she'll be in Texas for it tonight is
Speaker 1: to use the political power you give her to go
Speaker 1: out and do the exact opposite of what Jesus Christ preaches.
Speaker 1: That's what he's telling you to do. I hope he
Speaker 1: has a lightning proof studio, Ryan, I really do, I mean,
Speaker 1: think about their audacity to quote the Bible telling you
Speaker 1: to vote for somebody whose foundational principle is to allow
Speaker 1: the legal mass killing of humans. Wow, that's what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. That's how insane the left has become, and
Speaker 1: how stupid they think people of faith are. Well, guess
Speaker 1: what the jokes on them can detect. Then there's no
Speaker 1: we have no excuse. We might have an ex which is, oh,
Speaker 1: he's right. The American people are on trial because the
Speaker 1: choice could not be clearer at this point, and the
Speaker 1: American people are going to win this trial. They're going
Speaker 1: to choose right. They're going to reject Kamala Harris, they're
Speaker 1: going to reject that culture of death, they're going to
Speaker 1: reject everything that the Left has become, and they're going
Speaker 1: to choose another four years of Donald Trump. So yep,
Speaker 1: we're on trial, but we're going to win. Let's go
Speaker 1: to the phone lines beautiful birth at Colorado on this
Speaker 1: perfect Friday afternoon. We'll talk to Alicia. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 7: Welcome Alicia, Hi, Dan, I just had a question. I
Speaker 7: was picking my kids up at school and on a
Speaker 7: street corner, a public street corner, someone made a homemade
Speaker 7: sign and painted it that said Trump is a fascist
Speaker 7: with Nazi signs all over it. I'm just wondering if
Speaker 7: that's something I could remove or is it, you know,
Speaker 7: private property. It just really bothered me.
Speaker 1: Oh it's on public property?
Speaker 7: Well it was on a street corner of truth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean corner. Unless it's on somebody's lawn,
Speaker 1: that's going to be public property. So I don't want
Speaker 1: to give you legal advice here without researching it or
Speaker 1: calling the office and asking somebody else to research it.
Speaker 1: But my gut reaction would be if it's sitting there
Speaker 1: on city owned property. I'm just trying to think through.
Speaker 1: Could you then be accused of taking somebody else's property?
Speaker 1: Because even though this sign is heinous, it is somebody
Speaker 1: else's property. Have they actually abandoned it? Are they some
Speaker 1: nut job who's sitting there waiting for somebody to grab
Speaker 1: it so they can then confront them, Because anybody nutty
Speaker 1: enough to make that sign, you never know what they
Speaker 1: might do. So that's my analysis. If I'm talking to
Speaker 1: my daughter, would be leave it alone and pray for
Speaker 1: that idiot.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, thanks for the call.
Speaker 1: No really appreciate that. What do you think, Ryan? Do
Speaker 1: you think there's some psycho sitting there in a car,
Speaker 1: just filming, waiting for her to take the signs so
Speaker 1: they can and put it up on X and try
Speaker 1: to ruin her. They were psychic enough to put it up.
Speaker 1: There's psycho enough to do what you just described. I
Speaker 1: think that's a logical conclusion, my friend. Let's go to
Speaker 1: beautiful Long Mine. Can I even imagine the views of
Speaker 1: Long Peaks from there? Today? Rob, Welcome to the show.
Speaker 2: Longs is beautiful today?
Speaker 1: Oh man, how you doing Dan good? Have you ever
Speaker 1: played Twin Peaks golf course?
Speaker 2: Negative? I don't play past your.
Speaker 1: Pool, I'm telling you, man, it is about the most
Speaker 1: beautiful view of Long's Peak you can find anywhere. But
Speaker 1: go ahead, please, okay.
Speaker 8: So, to me, the post not endorsing a candidate, I
Speaker 8: mean they've always leaned to the left, if my memory.
Speaker 1: Serves me correct, all the way over, like falling down
Speaker 1: drunk to the left.
Speaker 2: And to me, them not endorsing her, to me, it's
Speaker 2: a vote of no confidence. And to me that is more.
Speaker 8: Damaging than coming out and saying no, we won't endorse you.
Speaker 2: Because a vote of no confidence.
Speaker 8: To me anyways, And I may be interpreting wrong, means
Speaker 8: that you have absolutely the zero.
Speaker 2: Faith in this individual.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Rob, I think.
Speaker 8: No, I don't like this point. Or no, I don't
Speaker 8: like this point. Okay, you've defined a couple areas.
Speaker 2: But with a no confidence. To me, it's painting a
Speaker 2: very broad brush.
Speaker 1: Man. I think you make a really important point because
Speaker 1: I know this is a little subtle, but but it
Speaker 1: may in some ways be more damaging to her than
Speaker 1: if they had just come out and articulated the reasons
Speaker 1: why that they're they're not endorsing her. And I know
Speaker 1: they came out and they've explained, we just don't want
Speaker 1: to endorse anybody for the rest of our history, but
Speaker 1: that may be more damaging in the sense that that
Speaker 1: they they did didn't even show her the respect of
Speaker 1: articulating why they're not endorsing her. It's almost as if saying,
Speaker 1: wait a second, this is too obvious. We don't even
Speaker 1: have to write it up. Yeah, that's kind of where. Yeah, hey,
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call on that. That's a very interesting point.
Speaker 1: What do you think of that, Ryan, I mean, they
Speaker 1: really are saying that, they're saying, wait a second, we
Speaker 1: got a lot of work to do here at the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. It is so obvious why we can't endorse her.
Speaker 1: We're not even going to take the time to put
Speaker 1: it unpaid.
Speaker 4: Who wants to be the musicians on the Titanic, you know,
Speaker 4: fiddling while the ship sinks, and they know it's going
Speaker 4: to be on the wrong side of history At this point,
Speaker 4: I think they're that confident. And Jeff Bezos is just
Speaker 4: following a litany, really a billionaire CEOs that are realizing
Speaker 4: they have Biden remorse that things were better under Trump.
Speaker 4: And the last time that WAPPO did not endorse a
Speaker 4: presidential candidate dan was nineteen eighty eight, and you might
Speaker 4: recall Michael Ducacus was a rather unpopular Democratic nominee at
Speaker 4: that point and he got scholac by George Herbert Walker Bush.
Speaker 4: I think some of the same is coming, and I
Speaker 4: think WAPPO feels it.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah. And imagine the access to polling they have, because,
Speaker 1: as everybody knows, these corporate polls, and the Washington Post
Speaker 1: is part of that. They don't publish every poll they do.
Speaker 1: They choose which poll they're going to publish and when
Speaker 1: and why. So imagine what their own internals are telling
Speaker 1: them and what they're hearing about other people's internals eight
Speaker 1: five five two five five to Denver, we go, Nelson,
Speaker 1: you're on the Dan Kaplis. You're welcome.
Speaker 9: That'sine Dan. I know you're a big fan of Donald Trump.
Speaker 9: I'm not. But what do I just want to get
Speaker 9: your opinion about. But do you think about someone who's
Speaker 9: running for the highest office in the land doing something
Speaker 9: sil caoundering? Is how alking watches in cologne and vodka
Speaker 9: and states and silver sneakers and most egregious of all bibles?
Speaker 1: Well, my friend, first of all, everything you just mentioned
Speaker 1: can be used by an individual at the same time,
Speaker 1: So think about the genius behind that, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: you could use all of those at the exact same time.
Speaker 1: But I think we go back to your premise where
Speaker 1: you say I'm a big fan of Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: first of all, there are certain things about him I
Speaker 1: admire tremendously, But overall I'm not voting for him or
Speaker 1: asking others to because I approve of everything he's done,
Speaker 1: including everything he's sold. It's in order to get all
Speaker 1: these good things for the country that he brought before
Speaker 1: and we'll bring again.
Speaker 9: Well, I just you know, I think back to the
Speaker 9: presents like Eisenhower and the Bushes and Bob Doele and
Speaker 9: John McCain, and I just can't imagine them stooping so
Speaker 9: low is.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but think about.
Speaker 1: This, I mean, how was Nelson. I'm gonna ask Nelson
Speaker 1: because he's going to talk us right into break, but
Speaker 1: he can answer on the other side, how do you
Speaker 1: canala join us as well? How was that Dole presidency?
Speaker 1: How was that presidency? And John McCain, I think he
Speaker 1: was a great American. I don't agree with every vote
Speaker 1: of his everything he ever said, but I think he
Speaker 1: was a truly great American hero. But how was that
Speaker 1: McCain presidency? And because Bob Dole lost, we got more
Speaker 1: Clinton because John McCain, a great American lost, and Bob
Speaker 1: Dole was a great American. Because John McCain lost, we
Speaker 1: got Barack Obama and all the terrible things that come
Speaker 1: with it. And so I'm not saying Donald Trump's perfect.
Speaker 1: I'm saying he and his voter saved American sixteen and
Speaker 1: they're about to do it again.
Speaker 5: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: To go to the vip line, welcome one of the
Speaker 1: best congressional candidates anywhere, Gabe Evans. And the reason that
Speaker 1: we've invited Gabe back on is because CD eight could
Speaker 1: very well determine control of the House of Representatives. As
Speaker 1: speak Erk Mike Johnson said when he came out, was
Speaker 1: kind enough to do an interview in support of Gabe Evans.
Speaker 1: And Gabe is also just particularly talented and well suited
Speaker 1: for this, having surved in the military law enforcement as well. Gabe,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the Dan Kapli Show.
Speaker 3: Thanks so much for having me on with you.
Speaker 1: My pleasure. I want to get the website out there
Speaker 1: right out of the gate in case people not driving,
Speaker 1: of course, want to multitask and look you up while
Speaker 1: we talk. Electgabeevans dot com. Elect Gabeevans dot com spelled
Speaker 1: as it sounds, So Gabe updatas man. I know every
Speaker 1: day there's more and more data, more and more early
Speaker 1: voting coming in, more and more going on on the trail.
Speaker 1: I saw your new spot, really loved it. Where do
Speaker 1: things stand?
Speaker 3: I mean, it's a sprint to the finish. We got
Speaker 3: eleven days and a wake up, as we would say
Speaker 3: in the army, But things are looking very very positive.
Speaker 3: I think last time I was on, we were asking
Speaker 3: about some early returns, so we've gotten some of that
Speaker 3: data now and again things are looking actually pretty good
Speaker 3: for conservatives. So we're actually up a little bit from
Speaker 3: where we're a few years ago with early returns, early voting,
Speaker 3: and that's super important that we make sure that we
Speaker 3: get those votes in and that we get those votes counted. Again,
Speaker 3: two years ago, this race was the closest loss in
Speaker 3: the nation for a Republican and we had about thirteen
Speaker 3: thousand registered Republicans. Just in Weld County, which is the
Speaker 3: conservative county in the district, we have thirteen thousand registered
Speaker 3: Republicans who didn't return their votes. So I can't overemphasize
Speaker 3: how critically important it is to get that vote in.
Speaker 3: Get your ballot in. The bonus is if you vote,
Speaker 3: we can't see how you voted, but we can see
Speaker 3: which ballots have been returned, and then that means you
Speaker 3: come off of the lists of phone calls, text messaging,
Speaker 3: door knockers, and so you get a little bit of
Speaker 3: a reprieve from some of that last minute campaigning that's
Speaker 3: going on again. But again, vote vote, Vote. You can
Speaker 3: follow your ballot along through the program called ballot Tracks
Speaker 3: trax and make sure that it's been received and counted.
Speaker 1: Do you think this national trend a lot of data
Speaker 1: right now indicating that there's an undeniable national trend in
Speaker 1: Trump's favor. Is that going to affect CD eight?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 3: I absolutely think that's going to affect City eight. I mean,
Speaker 3: folks are concerned about a couple of things. Concerned about crime.
Speaker 3: I'm looking at today's headlines for the Denver metro area
Speaker 3: right now. Top story Westminster student escapes, attempted kidnapping that
Speaker 3: happened in the eighth Congressional district this morning. A guy
Speaker 3: with a gun pulled up and tried to abduct a kid.
Speaker 3: My opponent voted to lower the penalty for crimes like that.
Speaker 3: She voted to lower the penalty for people who commit
Speaker 3: violent crimes with a gun from fifteen years to four years.
Speaker 3: Folks are sick of it, They're sick of the cost
Speaker 3: of living, and so what we see nationally is that
Speaker 3: voters trust the conservative candidates to be the ones who
Speaker 3: will focus on community safety and who will be the
Speaker 3: ones who will reward work and not punish it with
Speaker 3: higher taxes, more regular and more red tape, and so
Speaker 3: I think that that's a very positive development both nationally
Speaker 3: and here in the eighth Congressional District.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Gabe Evans, our guest, tying into the national trend,
Speaker 1: I think there's no doubt come election day, even more
Speaker 1: powerful than the economy for most people, say in a
Speaker 1: state like Colorado that's very directly affected is going to
Speaker 1: be the border. And you know, you've been absolutely consistent
Speaker 1: on that. Your whole life has been about law enforcement
Speaker 1: and protecting the country. Yet your opponent's out there spending
Speaker 1: what seems to be a gazillion dollars trying to convince
Speaker 1: people that she's down there at the border herself, you know,
Speaker 1: throwing people out. So what's the truth about your opponent's
Speaker 1: record on the border.
Speaker 3: Well, I've actually been to the border. I was down
Speaker 3: at the border about six six weeks ago, and so
Speaker 3: I've seen firsthand what's going on as a police officer
Speaker 3: for ten years, as a as a soldier with a
Speaker 3: lot of time in the National Guard, I was able
Speaker 3: to have some you know, very in depth and technical
Speaker 3: conversations with the border patrol, with the National Guard folks
Speaker 3: who are down along the Texas part of the border
Speaker 3: about the problems that they're facing, and those problems are
Speaker 3: quite honestly exacerbated by my opponent. One of the biggest
Speaker 3: things that they need out at the border is more
Speaker 3: border wall constructed, because that border wall provides that intermediate
Speaker 3: barrier to be able to slow folks down and allow
Speaker 3: the border patrol to be able to contact them before
Speaker 3: they disappear into the American side of the border. My
Speaker 3: opponent has voted against the border wall. Not only that,
Speaker 3: she has repeatedly voted here in Colorado to make it
Speaker 3: illegal for state and local law enforcement to even share
Speaker 3: information with Immigration and Customs for deportation related proceedings. And
Speaker 3: so when we see cartel members, we see transnational gang
Speaker 3: members in our communities, the reasons they have chosen to
Speaker 3: set up shop here in Colorado is because my opponent's
Speaker 3: voting record has made it so that those folks cannot
Speaker 3: be reported by law enforcement two Immigration and Customs to
Speaker 3: get them out of our communities. And the result of
Speaker 3: that is Colorado is the third most dangerous state in
Speaker 3: the country, more dangerous than California, more dangerous than New York,
Speaker 3: and we're number two for our teenagers overdosing and dying
Speaker 3: on illegal drugs, predominantly fentanol Man and Gabe.
Speaker 1: What you just mentioned, I think is the true window
Speaker 1: into who your opponent really is. I mean, anybody who
Speaker 1: would say, Okay, somebody here illegally who then commits a
Speaker 1: crime so serious they end up getting arrested. No, even then,
Speaker 1: we're not going to let police share that with ice.
Speaker 1: To me, that just tells you everything you need to know.
Speaker 1: And it's completely unjustifiable. I think it's im moral, and
Speaker 1: it just shows anybody who supports that kind of policy
Speaker 1: just does not care about the life and health and
Speaker 1: safety of American citizens. I don't know how anybody could
Speaker 1: look at it any other way.
Speaker 3: Well, and it's truly terrible because this just wasn't a
Speaker 3: one time vote. She's actually doubled down on those policies.
Speaker 3: Her first vote was in twenty nineteen prohibit law enforcement
Speaker 3: for me being able to honor immigration detainers from Immigration
Speaker 3: and Customs law enforcement enforcement found a workaround for some
Speaker 3: of those most serious cases that you just described, violent
Speaker 3: felonies committed in our communities by folks who are not
Speaker 3: legally present. And so then in twenty twenty one, she
Speaker 3: doubled down on that policy to close that workaround that
Speaker 3: law enforcement had found and make it absolutely crystal clear
Speaker 3: that she does not want state and local law enforcement
Speaker 3: to be able to coordinate with immigration and Customs for
Speaker 3: any reason at all, period, the end of story. And
Speaker 3: she doubled down again on that in our most recent
Speaker 3: televised debate where she was asked why did you vote
Speaker 3: that way, and then she said she doesn't think that
Speaker 3: state and local law enforcement should be involved in those
Speaker 3: sorts of things. Again, we're seeing the results in our community.
Speaker 3: That is why Cartel's transnational gang members are picking Colorado
Speaker 3: to set up shops. We've literally rolled out, We've rolled
Speaker 3: out the red carpet for international criminal syndicates to come
Speaker 3: here to Colorado because of these soft on crime and
Speaker 3: sanctuary state lives that my opponent has repeatedly championed.
Speaker 1: No, you are exactly right, Gabe, and for that and
Speaker 1: so many other reasons, I hope that folks take a
Speaker 1: real hard look at you in the race and do
Speaker 1: everything they can to help in these last few days.
Speaker 1: It's Electgabeevans dot Com. Appreciate the time, good luck.
Speaker 3: Oh, thank you so much. Always enjoy being on.
Speaker 1: Thank you, my friend, take care. Gabe Evans, please take
Speaker 1: a look at that race. Anything you can do to
Speaker 1: help eight five zero five A two five five text
Speaker 1: d an five seven seven three nine. Nelson has hung
Speaker 1: on Nelson, who is disagreeing with me before Gabe was
Speaker 1: kind enough to join us. And we're grateful to Nelson
Speaker 1: for that. So we'll get him on after this next break.
Speaker 1: And to the lady with the offending Trump sign, make
Speaker 1: another sign, something like pay for the owner slash maker
Speaker 1: of the sign. I got the first part of that,
Speaker 1: which was a woman called earlier and said somebody had
Speaker 1: put up a Trump as a fascist homemade sign with
Speaker 1: schwastik is on it on city property near an intersection.
Speaker 1: She wanted to know if she could take it down.
Speaker 1: We had that conversation. Nice creative thought from the Texter,
Speaker 1: which is, hey, make her own sign and just put
Speaker 1: it up in front of in front of that ignorance
Speaker 1: sign out there. I like that, Thank you. Dan. Kamala
Speaker 1: can only win with a hail Mary type scenario. She
Speaker 1: goes to Texas several times in this final week. They
Speaker 1: steal Texas saying much how much she wiled Texas and Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: and that is all they need to win, so Texter
Speaker 1: concerned about that. I don't think Kamala Harris is going
Speaker 1: to Texas and I think she's gonna win Texas. I
Speaker 1: think she's going to Texas thinking because she's in Texas,
Speaker 1: her appearance will get a lot more attention, and that
Speaker 1: she's playing to the swing states to the Texas appearance. Listen.
Speaker 1: I think that's a strategy Trump uses, and it's wise right.
Speaker 1: Trump's going to New York not because he thinks he's
Speaker 1: going to win it. Ryan is an interesting theory. I
Speaker 1: think it makes sense that Trump gets the added benefit
Speaker 1: of hopefully winning the national popular vote in addition to
Speaker 1: winning the electoral college vote, thereby more political capital, more unity.
Speaker 1: I like that idea. What gets me with Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: is her official schedule didn't start until very late in
Speaker 1: the day, and this is several days in a row
Speaker 1: of that, and the thing in Texas doesn't start till
Speaker 1: nine thirty Eastern. How does that make political sense at
Speaker 1: least for those swing states in that time zone? Eight
Speaker 1: five five for zero five eight two five five the
Speaker 1: number when we come back some poll results going to
Speaker 1: put a big old smile on your face unless of
Speaker 1: course you want Kamala Harris to win, in which case
Speaker 1: it's probably better to start getting used to the idea
Speaker 1: right now that she's not going to be president. You're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 5: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I can't help myself. I'm getting up out of my
Speaker 1: chair in the air. What's I heard? Race got an
Speaker 1: Apple watch?
Speaker 5: I told Kelly that was gonna happen.
Speaker 3: Up.
Speaker 1: It's automatic Visceral running through the streets a boulder four
Speaker 1: in the morning, getting ready for that big fight, walking
Speaker 1: into the arena, sold out basketball arena, fighting light heavyweight.
Speaker 1: That was the song in my head, this very one.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah yeah. Now that didn't have air pods and
Speaker 1: all that, and so it was like in my head,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, I love this finish too. And that's what
Speaker 1: I heard, man, That's what That's what was in my
Speaker 1: head is I got in the ring, got between the ropes,
Speaker 1: and then I got this guy in the ropes and
Speaker 1: then it's over and I hear that bell ring. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's one of the greatest feelings in life.
Speaker 4: If you're not ready to fight after hearing that, Oh,
Speaker 4: there's not a pulse in you absolutely.
Speaker 1: I wonder why Trump doesn't use it because its Stallan's
Speaker 1: a fan, isn't he? Yes, he is one of us,
Speaker 1: Yes he is. Well, I guess I guess Stallone doesn't
Speaker 1: own the music. But yeah, I sure wish Trump could
Speaker 1: use that eight five five or Z five eight two
Speaker 1: five five text d A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: Gabe Evans joined us just before the breakup in CD eight,
Speaker 1: and I don't care where in America you are. You
Speaker 1: want to save America. Help Gabe Evans because Congress control
Speaker 1: may depend on CD eight, and he is a really
Speaker 1: good candidate. Let's go back to our friend Nelson, who
Speaker 1: disagrees with me. Was kind enough to hang on the
Speaker 1: gist of Nelson before the break goes, hey Dan, you're
Speaker 1: a fan of Trump, and then went on to make
Speaker 1: arguments by way Trump's so scurreless. And my point was,
Speaker 1: I admire certain things about the president, but no, I'm
Speaker 1: a fan of all the good things he does for
Speaker 1: the country. Go ahead, my friend, the floor is yours.
Speaker 9: Well, that's bring Central, bringing me back. I just went
Speaker 9: him in my backyard while I was waiting to get
Speaker 9: back on this van. But thank you, anyway, and I
Speaker 9: think I got gout off.
Speaker 1: Well, if you're the same Nelson I was disagreeing with earlier. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we just went to a guest. But go ahead, my friend,
Speaker 1: if there's anything else you wanted to see, then the.
Speaker 9: Part I was trying to make you say, I just
Speaker 9: felt like he was one of the dignity of the office,
Speaker 9: to the Elmorgantry type salesperson while you're running for the
Speaker 9: highest office in the land. And obviously you disagreed with
Speaker 9: real Van Nelson.
Speaker 1: Have you have you seen those high top tennis shoes?
Speaker 9: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Sure, they are really cool. I've been exact. Was a
Speaker 1: little disappointed on my birthday.
Speaker 9: Dollar Riskwatch is really cool too.
Speaker 1: But what was that?
Speaker 9: So the hundred thousand dollars the Riskwatch is really I'm.
Speaker 1: Not into that stuff. No, but but I was a
Speaker 1: little disappointed on my birthday and then Father's Day, which
Speaker 1: are about a month apart, when I opened up that
Speaker 1: box and there were not those Trump high tops in there.
Speaker 1: What I thought Joe might have gotten those for you. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: well I was counting on Amy. Oh no, no, that
Speaker 1: was bad. Nelson. Is there any Trump product you like?
Speaker 9: I haven't tried. I'm not a stake. Ea, Okay, I
Speaker 9: drank vodka, but I don't drink Trump vodka. Okay, So no,
Speaker 9: there's nothing else that I participate in. I don't I'm
Speaker 9: not religious, so I don't be the Bible. So I
Speaker 9: wouldn't change that.
Speaker 1: You can change that. Hey, I'm glad you called man.
Speaker 1: I hope you call us off and have a good weekend.
Speaker 9: I appreciate you taking an opposition call.
Speaker 1: Well, so Nelson, believe me, we're grateful for that. Thank you,
Speaker 1: my friend. And that's that's been our mo now for
Speaker 1: decades on aras. We take those first and we're so
Speaker 1: grateful for him. And yeah, that the Bible part of it.
Speaker 1: You know, that's so interesting to me because so often
Speaker 1: and off air, I'll have people say, hey, man, you
Speaker 1: know you talk about your faith and you talk about
Speaker 1: all this and that. How can you support a guy
Speaker 1: who ABC D and E. And I said, Man, I'm
Speaker 1: no biblical scholar. I did my four years in the
Speaker 1: Catholic seminary high school years and I loved it, but
Speaker 1: we were much more focused on social justice, community outreach.
Speaker 1: I don't claim to be a biblical scholar, but I
Speaker 1: know this about the Bible. And I know God uses
Speaker 1: broken people, and most of the heroic figures in the
Speaker 1: Bible were broken people, and that is just something God does,
Speaker 1: I think for obvious reasons, because A, we're all broken
Speaker 1: and B you see all these broken people do phenomenal things,
Speaker 1: and Trump is is just that, right. I mean, you
Speaker 1: look at how Trump in terms of the morality of
Speaker 1: his policies, he has been the single most moral president
Speaker 1: of my lifetime. Now, in his personal life, does he
Speaker 1: do some stuff that would not get a passing grade
Speaker 1: if you're grading in on a biblical scale, Sure, But
Speaker 1: then when you look at the morality of his public
Speaker 1: policies and all the lives he's saved, and all the
Speaker 1: good he's done and protecting religious liberty, I mean, he
Speaker 1: has been a stunningly moral president in terms of those
Speaker 1: public acts, and so that's what I care about. I
Speaker 1: think Ryan he's also been a biblical figure in the
Speaker 1: sense of his personal courage and his resilience. I mean,
Speaker 1: how about his journey everything except being swallowed by a whale.
Speaker 1: I mean, they've thrown everything at him. And that's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons he's going to win, right because Americans,
Speaker 1: even those who may not like him that they like
Speaker 1: a fighter, they like a comeback story. You look at
Speaker 1: everything he's overcome.
Speaker 4: Look at his personal journey and faith after the assassination attempted.
Speaker 4: If you want somebody to Nelse's point, you don't look
Speaker 4: at Dan Caplis. How about Franklin Graham, a man of God,
Speaker 4: the son of Billy Graham, who wholeheartedly endorses Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: Why do you think Franklin Graham would do that to
Speaker 4: a broken man like Donald Trump, to endorse him, to
Speaker 4: support him.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then you come back to this really profound question.
Speaker 1: Did God save Trump in Butler now personally for the
Speaker 1: reasons I've said I believe he did. If Trump now
Speaker 1: goes on to win as expected, is that further proof
Speaker 1: that Trump was saved and saved for a reason. The
Speaker 1: founders believed in divine providence. They put it in the declaration,
Speaker 1: and they bet their life on it.