Speaker 1: Top ink Clue Park.
Speaker 2: President Trump addressing reporters now for touching down in New Jersey.
Speaker 3: Let's listen in.
Speaker 1: You know, I'll really say that it depends what the
decision is. But I wouldn't really be able to tell
you that now.
Speaker 4: I'll tell you what about a year from now, maybe
five years or ten years from now. There would never
know about decisions.
Speaker 1: You never really knows.
Speaker 5: Wilder negotiations happening.
Speaker 4: I might depending on the circumstance. Would would you be
very hard to stop? I will say this, it's very
hard to stop when you look at it. Israel's doing
well in terms of war, and I think you would
say that Iran is doing less well.
Speaker 1: It's a little bit hard to get somebody to stop there.
Speaker 6: Leam Concert was your former congressman. Back Gates throughout an
interesting idea suggesting that if if you were to broker
a deal where nuclear inspectors go into both Israel and Iran,
that you could win a Nobel Peace Prize and they
might even rename it the Trump Peace Price.
Speaker 1: That you hear those, what do.
Speaker 5: You think of that?
Speaker 4: Well, they should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda.
And if you looked the cargo, or you could say Serbia, Kosovo,
you could say a lot of them. You could say,
I mean the big one is India and Pakistan.
Speaker 1: You could I should have gotten it four or five times.
Speaker 4: I should get it for the I would think the
Abraham Accords would be a good one too. They won't
give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give
it to liberals.
Speaker 5: Would you support Iran being able to have nuclear earth
Would you support Iran being able to have civilian nuclear
energy capabilities up to three point seven six percent?
Speaker 4: You know, they're sitting on the top of one of
the largest piles of oil in the world.
Speaker 1: I just don't know why they need that for civilian work.
Speaker 4: You know, it's one thing for certain countries to say, hey,
I want to have a certain amount where I could
go do clear a little bit because we need it
for electricity, we needed for air conditioners, etc. But when
you're sitting on one of the largest oil piles anywhere
in the world, it's a little bit hard to.
Speaker 1: See why you did that. Yeah, proxies would wage terror
attacks against American targets abroad if you order military accent.
Speaker 4: We're always concerned about that, and we have to take
them out and be very strong. You're even the danger
talking to me right now. Do you know that you
are in danger talking to me right now? So I
should probably get out of here. But you guys are
actually in danger.
Speaker 1: Can you believe it? Because it's it's still your expectation.
Speaker 4: That NATO countries spent five percent of their GDP on
defense spending, I think.
Speaker 1: They should do that. I don't think we should, but
I think they should.
Speaker 4: We've been spending, we've been supporting NATO so long, in
many cases I believe paying almost one hundred percent the cause.
So I don't think we should, but I think that
the NATO country should absolutely.
Speaker 1: Besides contru well.
Speaker 4: NATO's going to have to deal with Spain's been a
very low payer. They were always a very low payer.
They were either good negotiators or they weren't doing the
right thing. I mean, I think Spain has to pay
what everybody else has to pay. Spain has been notorious
for low pay. You know who else was a low payer?
Just about the lowest a place called Canada, because Canada said,
why shouldn't we pay with the United States will protect
us free?
Speaker 1: And what's been right about them?
Speaker 6: Ice, you've been making progress Nords of me steel. But
I don't know if you know this, but Lindsay Braham
and Mike Campaign where they're on.
Speaker 1: The ground in Ukraine.
Speaker 6: Seemingly doing the opposite, trying to promote the Ukrainians to
keep fighting.
Speaker 1: What do you think of that?
Speaker 4: Well, we're going to see, and people have to be
very careful with what they say. They've got to be
very careful with their mouth because their mouth could get
them into a lot of trouble.
Speaker 5: One more Ice ICE has said that they're trying to
arrest up to three thousand individuals a day. There are
some communities that are saying they're fearful of being wrongfully
detained or separating some families even if they're undocumented. Is
the fear in some of these communities worth the deportations
of these undocumented individuals a massive portation. Probably.
Speaker 4: It's a tough subject because, look, we have farmers. I
love farmers. I want eighty percent eighty five percent of
the farmers and I love them, and I'm never going
to do anything to hurt our farmers.
Speaker 1: And you can also say the leisure business, etc. There
are some businesses.
Speaker 4: Where you have a disproportionate amount of people that are
the people that you're talking about. At the same time,
we have to get the criminals out of our country,
and we're looking at doing something where in the case
of good, reputable farmers, they can take responsibility for the
people that they hire and let them have responsibility because
we can't put the farms out of business, and at
the same time, we don't want to hurt people that
aren't criminals. Most of the people that came in over
the last three years under Biden, I would say probably
three and a half to four years those people. You
have a lot of criminals. You have a lot of
I mean, we're looking at that very closely. You've had
people that have worked on farms for twenty years. It's
very hard to go in there and say, you know
you're coming out, But we're going to let the farmers
take responsibility.
Speaker 1: They're great people, they'll do it. They know the good
and the bad.
Speaker 4: So the hard part about this is not like a
normal war that where people wear uniforms.
Speaker 1: They don't wear uniforms.
Speaker 4: But we have murderers that came out of the last
four years. We have murderers, We have drug lords, we
have people that we don't want it. We have prisoners
they emptied out Venezuela and many countries they emptied out
their prisons into the United States.
Speaker 1: We have to get those people out.
Speaker 4: But we have stone cold murders, eleven thousand, eight hundred
and eighty eight murders. We've already gotten a lot of
them out of here, but we don't want them, so
we have to be careful. But I never want to
hurt our farmers. Our farmers are great people. They keep
us happy and healthy in fat.
Speaker 5: Are there other cities that you're going to try to
replicate what you've done in Los Angeles?
Speaker 4: Well, I mean, we had a big victory last night
in the Court of Appeals with respect to Los Angeles,
but really the country where Gavin Duscomb, who's really an
incompetent governor, he's sugested doing a terrible job, between his fires,
between all the houses burning down as far as fires,
and now Los Angeles. If we didn't go to Los
Angeles and the sheriff admitted it, he had no control,
he would have lost control.
Speaker 1: We saved Los.
Speaker 4: Angeles by having the military go in, and the second
night was much better. The third night was nothing much,
And the fourth night nobody bothered even coming. We put
out that fire and we did a great job of it.
He sued us for.
Speaker 1: Going in and for helping him. We went and helped them.
Speaker 4: Right now, you'd have Los Angeles burning to the ground largely,
it would have already been destroyed.
Speaker 1: Does you want the place president to be? Not of
a peacemaker you worried about striking around? We changed that.
Always a peace maker.
Speaker 4: That doesn't mean sometimes you need some toughness to make peace,
but always a bespect if you.
Speaker 5: Are wrong without ground forces, saying is it aerial.
Speaker 6: Campaignment or wrong enough for do you need ground forces?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm not going to talk about ground forces. The
last thing you want to do is ground force?
Speaker 5: Does it run have two weeks or could you strike
before that? Are you essentially giving them a two week timeline,
giving them a period of time.
Speaker 4: We're gonna see what that period of time is, but
I'm giving them a period of time, and I would
say two weeks would be the maximum.
Speaker 1: And do you think people patents to focus on criminals
or all people who are here illegal should start focusing
on criminals. And that's what we've.
Speaker 4: Been focused on very bad criminals, dangerous criminals.
Speaker 3: But seven Miller said, you go on in there every
person who's here illegally.
Speaker 1: He's so nice to arrest everyone who's here illegally. Steve
It and I have a very good understanding. He is
a terrific person. We have a great understanding.
Speaker 6: Guys, President, if there are if there is an attack
on US assets, will you promise to conduct and full
investigation and make it transparent with the American people before
blaming Iran for such a time.
Speaker 4: Well, if there's an attack, we'll know almost immediately with
modern equipment who made the attack, and those people will
be very very unhappy, would.
Speaker 5: You, Prime Minister, I want to get you.
Speaker 1: People out of danger.
Speaker 5: Standing with me one more, Prime Minister in net Yah
who said that they had the capacity to take out
all of Aroun's nuclear facilities, So what role would the
US be able to play and why would they If
Israel says that they have all of the abilities, then
the jury.
Speaker 4: Said that, but uh, they really have a very limited capacity.
They could break through a little section, but they can't
go down very deep. They don't have that capacity, And
we'll have to see what happens. Maybe it won't be necessary,
Maybe it won't be this. Would you like to see
Congress as a build advance child transgender surgeries?
Speaker 1: Well, I know they're talking about it, aren't they.
Speaker 4: We're gonna have to see how it comes to me
and what form. Certainly it's been something I've been talking about.
Speaker 1: Also. Okay, thank you, thank you, mister. I appreciate, thank
you everybody.
Speaker 6: All Right.
Speaker 2: President Trump taking questions there from reporters as he lands
in New Jersey, headed to Trump National Golf Club there
and been mister for the weekend. More, let's bring in
our senior White House coursepond slain a Wang so ask
if he's a peacemaker. He says, he's always a peacemaker.
But he's giving Iran still a two week timeline, and
anything could happen within those two weeks.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Kira.
Speaker 3: A lot of ground that the President just covered there,
and in particular he said that two weeks would be
the maximum that he's giving a run a period of time,
but two weeks would be the maximum amount of time. Also, interestingly,
the President was asked whether or not he would request
Israel to stop strikes on Iran. The President said, quote,
I think it's very hard to make that request right now.
If someone is winning, it's harder to do than if
someone is losing, saying that Israel is doing better than
Iran in this and also when he was asked about
European negotiations with Iranian officials today, brushed that off, saying
that Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe, but to US.
Europe will not be able to help.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: This does come after those European talks with Iranian officials
led to no breakthrough, but both sides agreed to continue talking.
The big question though, in all this Kira, is whether
or not Iran is going to come back to the
negotiating table and cut a deal with the US. There's
no clear evidence or signs that they're more willing to
do so than they were before these strikes began, but
clearly here the President is holding out hope here for
a diplomatic solution. But a lot of questions that are
still weighing on the president's mind. One of them is
we are still rushing US military assets to the region.
The President has been advised, according to a source, to
wait until all those assets are in place in case
US forces or assets are targeted by Iran. The other
aspect the President is weighing, according to this source, is
that it's not guaranteed that this thirty thousand pound bunker
busting bomb would be successful. This is something that has
been tested but not actually carried out in war, so
a lot of questions the president is facing. He will
be meeting with his national security team throughout the weekend.
Speaker 2: All right, our Selena waiting there at the White House
for us Selena, Thank you a love. Continuing updates right
here on ABC News Live throughout the day