Speaker 1: I feel like Joe Biden's revelation of prostate cancer is
Speaker 1: the news stutter. In other words, we're supposed to stop
Speaker 1: talking about his broken brain and no one knew who
Speaker 1: was really running the country because now he's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 2: But Joe was.
Speaker 1: Trying to tell us about that in twenty two about
Speaker 1: I don't remember. It might have been in Delaware when
Speaker 1: he was reciting the lie about the oil smear.
Speaker 3: You might be referring to this, and.
Speaker 4: Guess what the first frost, You know, what was happening.
Speaker 4: How to put on a windshield wipers to get literally
Speaker 4: the oils to look off the window. That's why I
Speaker 4: have so damn any other people I grew up had cancer,
Speaker 4: and why camp for the longest time Feller had the
Speaker 4: highest cancer rate in the nation. I guarantee you I
Speaker 4: will be totally transparent in terms of my health, all
Speaker 4: aspects of my health. That's why I have so damn
Speaker 4: any other people I grew up have cancer.
Speaker 3: M July twenty, twenty twenty two. Biden says, that's why
Speaker 3: I and so damn many other people I grew up
Speaker 3: with have cancer. Now I want to make abundantly clear
Speaker 3: first and foremost that my sympathy goes out to Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: as it would with anyone who's diagnosed with metastatic prostate
Speaker 3: cancer metastasized into the bones. That's a very painful cancer. Well,
Speaker 3: any cancer that's metastasized into your bones is you're going
Speaker 3: to be painful. Sometimes they do bone marrow transplants, they'll
Speaker 3: do I mean, but and chemo is is hit and miss,
Speaker 3: because once it's metastasized, you don't know where it's going.
Speaker 3: But how long have they known about about this? It
Speaker 3: doesn't appear overnight. It festers in rare but dangerous case,
Speaker 3: this prostate cancer bypasses the usual slow growth, and it
Speaker 3: does indeed strike quickly, especially the older that you get. Now,
Speaker 3: if Biden was not screened regularly, or he had an
Speaker 3: aggressive subtype that evades PSA detection. You know, my doctors
Speaker 3: have often said, you know, for example, I'm due for
Speaker 3: a colonoscopy, and I've asked my doctor, you know, because
Speaker 3: I've heard stories that and not from doctor Google, but
Speaker 3: I've just you know, in reading about different things. You know,
Speaker 3: when you get older, you start reading about stuff, and
Speaker 3: so I've asked both my regular PCP and my anti
Speaker 3: aging doctor, should I do a regular colonoscopy or you know,
Speaker 3: should I do one of these other screening tests, and
Speaker 3: there are actually some other screening tests you can do now,
Speaker 3: but no, they both recommend it. Go ahead and get
Speaker 3: the colonoscopy. My concern was that sometimes they see the
Speaker 3: polyps and they remove the polyps, and the pops. In
Speaker 3: removing the polyps, polyps can act like a The polyps
Speaker 3: have actually cancered some of the bad stuff in your
Speaker 3: in your colon, and those polyps form and keep them
Speaker 3: from spreading into your body. So it does make some
Speaker 3: logical sense, maybe not medical sense, but it makes logical
Speaker 3: sense that if a doctor goes in and removes those polyps,
Speaker 3: you can have some of those cancerous or dangerous cells
Speaker 3: escape and now they're they're in your gut, and that
Speaker 3: could lead to cancer down the road. But both of
Speaker 3: my doctors have said, no, that's highly unlikely. We've seen
Speaker 3: those studies too. We don't really see a lot of causation.
Speaker 3: We still think the colonoscopy is still or you know,
Speaker 3: any kind of screen but you should go get your colonoscopy.
Speaker 3: So I'm not to schedule and get a day off,
Speaker 3: Take a day off and go get a colinoscoby. So
Speaker 3: the point is that there are some aggressive subtypes they
Speaker 3: can have a PSA detection. My PSA has always been like,
Speaker 3: you know, zero point nine or one point one or something,
Speaker 3: and it's never been elevated. So it's it's never it's
Speaker 3: never changed, never been out of that range. But how
Speaker 3: can we imagine that our president was not screened properly
Speaker 3: because again, it's one of the easiest cancers to diagnose.
Speaker 3: The PSA blood test itself shows the rate of cancer
Speaker 3: cell growth. Even with the most aggressive form, it's a
Speaker 3: five to seven year journey without treatment before it becomes metastatic, meaning,
Speaker 3: as several people have said on x and one of
Speaker 3: those people being uh doctor Stephen Quay, who points out
Speaker 3: that it would be malpractice for this patient, Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: to show up and be first diagnosed with metastatic disease
Speaker 3: in May of twenty twenty five. He believes that it's
Speaker 3: very highly likely that he was carrying a diagnosis of
Speaker 3: prostate cancer throughout his White House tenure, and that Americans
Speaker 3: were simply uninformed about it, or they weren't told about
Speaker 3: They not just uninformed but oh, use the word cover up.
Speaker 2: A quick question, timeline wise, was.
Speaker 5: This announcement about the prostate cancer after her.
Speaker 2: Audio was released?
Speaker 3: You know? Good and will it was?
Speaker 2: Oh, I know, quite honestly, I had no idea. I didn't.
Speaker 2: I didn't pay attention to anything all weekend long. Oh
Speaker 2: yeah really did no?
Speaker 3: No? Well, yeah, because the her came out on Friday,
Speaker 3: gotcha her? Her came out. I spent two hours on
Speaker 3: it on Saturday, okay, and I want to talk a
Speaker 3: little bit about it again today, and then boom, yesterday
Speaker 3: we get the announcement about, oh, He's got prostate cancer.
Speaker 5: Because as I was scrolling through my social feedia and
Speaker 5: social media feeds late last night before bed, I'm looking
Speaker 5: at oh, her audio is out, Oh Biden's got cancer.
Speaker 5: So I didn't know what the timeline was here. But oh,
Speaker 5: that seems interesting.
Speaker 3: It seems odd, interesting, odd, you say, Tomatow, I say
Speaker 3: to Mono. Interesting odd. So we're the American people uninformed.
Speaker 3: There's something else here that makes you wonder in light
Speaker 3: of everything that we know. So what's the name of Jake?
Speaker 4: Never?
Speaker 3: I never can't remember the Jake name it because I'm
Speaker 3: not going to go buy it Jake Tapper's book, The
Speaker 3: Jake Tapper.
Speaker 2: And if I covered it up, if I very like, if.
Speaker 3: I forget what it's got original sin, Yeah, I think
Speaker 3: that's it original Sin. No, that's my book, and that's
Speaker 3: not a cover up, that's an exple's. And then there's
Speaker 3: another book that came out maybe a month or two ago.
Speaker 3: So so the books are starting to come out, but
Speaker 3: no one's talking about something else. That's another factor in
Speaker 3: all of this that I find interesting. But let's go
Speaker 3: back to just focus on the cancer for a moment.
Speaker 3: Should the cancer been caught earlier? I'm not a doctor,
Speaker 3: why I'm not yours doctor, but I don't even play
Speaker 3: a doctor on the radio. But yes, it should have
Speaker 3: been caught earlier. That's why I use the term malpractice.
Speaker 3: Localized prostate cancer is often curable, but once it escapes
Speaker 3: the polyp or the capsule or however you know it's
Speaker 3: howe of it's contained and spreads you, you shift from
Speaker 3: cure to containment. And a miss or a delayed diagnosis
Speaker 3: is a critical failure point. So is it rare for
Speaker 3: this to happen? So here's some stats about ten to
Speaker 3: fifteen percent of prostate cancers are diagnosed first at stage four.
Speaker 3: That's when it is in the bones like this is. Now,
Speaker 3: if you're over the age of eight mail over the
Speaker 3: age of eighty, especially those with inconsistent screening, it's even
Speaker 3: more common you have consistent screenings, it's not that common.
Speaker 3: But again, for a president of the because here's something
Speaker 3: that's different. Now, I just want to remember, this is
Speaker 3: something that's different. We're talking about a president of the
Speaker 3: United States. So for a president of the United States
Speaker 3: to be diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer is, in doctor
Speaker 3: Cray's opinion, nothing short of malpractice.
Speaker 4: I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
Speaker 4: of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3: So today's treatment in twenty twenty five for metastatic prostate
Speaker 3: cancer is not the same kind of medicine that was
Speaker 3: practiced by you know, your your grandfather or Tamer's dad,
Speaker 3: or what he may have done when he was practicing.
Speaker 3: Because today it's a high tech procedure, high tech playbook,
Speaker 3: hormone suppression, precision radiation, smart drugs, immunotherapy, and the very
Speaker 3: first step usually shuts down testosterone because testosterone feels prostate
Speaker 3: cancer I've told you I've been on testosterony replacement therapy
Speaker 3: for more than a decade, and that's one of the
Speaker 3: other reasons that they still want me to get the colonoscopy,
Speaker 3: even though my PSA rem you know, zero point nine
Speaker 3: or one point one or whatever it is, never gets
Speaker 3: with outside that range. So because of my testosterone levels,
Speaker 3: and I I keep my I do I keep my
Speaker 3: testosterone levels. Hell, Hell, I keep them high for energy
Speaker 3: and for well for other reasons too. And you control
Speaker 3: that through drugs or injections called androgen deprivation therapy. And
Speaker 3: then there's a second line agent, drugs like arbitraone, and
Speaker 3: there's another one in insolent insulumentide or something like that,
Speaker 3: that blocks the cancer's ability to rewire itself and then
Speaker 3: keeps it from growing. But it's costly. It's not just
Speaker 3: costly financially, it's costly physically too. You end up with fatigue,
Speaker 3: hot flashes, weakened bones. There's obviously because of the testosterone,
Speaker 3: there's a drop in sexual function. It can affect the liver.
Speaker 3: It's another reason why even because I'm on testosterony replacement therapy,
Speaker 3: it's another reason why both of my doctors regularly checked
Speaker 3: all of my liver functions, and they keep my blood
Speaker 3: pressure even though you know, my blood pressure is under
Speaker 3: control and I could probably do without, you know, one
Speaker 3: of my blood pressure medications, but I prefer to stay
Speaker 3: on it because I don't see any other side effects
Speaker 3: and they're like, yeah, you might as well. And so
Speaker 3: I've got really really good blood pressure. So it's a
Speaker 3: trade off. All of this is a trade off, you know,
Speaker 3: and it's a trade off that we all make as
Speaker 3: we get older. Now do we want these treatments not
Speaker 3: want these treatments? And I think it. You know, all
Speaker 3: of those questions depend upon your quality of life and
Speaker 3: my quality of life other than having to work with
Speaker 3: dragon and you know, get up at o dark thirty
Speaker 3: in the morning, which actually I'm just kind of used
Speaker 3: to me. Now that's fine. My quality life is is great.
Speaker 3: But you know, the trade off extra years of life,
Speaker 3: but you're gonna have closer medical supervision. You're going to
Speaker 3: make all these adjustments. You know, as you continued age,
Speaker 3: you're gonna still make all these judgments. But still even
Speaker 3: with all of those tools, all of those medications, all
Speaker 3: of those protocols, many men lived for years after a diagnosis,
Speaker 3: they remain active, engaged, and they still remain in the fight.
Speaker 3: But there's an uncomfortable question at all of this. It's
Speaker 3: the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room. If early
Speaker 3: signs were dismissed, or early signs downplayed, or early signs
Speaker 3: covered up in order to maintain a campaign image, then yes,
Speaker 3: treatment could have been compromised because every week, every month
Speaker 3: with aggressive variance matters, and if you delay biopsy, imaging,
Speaker 3: or therapy in order to protect the political up, that
Speaker 3: comes at a steep biological price. And of course that's
Speaker 3: all speculation, but doctor Clay concludes that the highest probability
Speaker 3: is that the diagnosis has been known for many years,
Speaker 3: but there was a calculated decision not to announce it.
Speaker 3: There was a calculated decision not to treat it.
Speaker 4: I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
Speaker 4: of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 3: And I think finally there was this hope that after
Speaker 3: the reelection the treatment could be done when it was
Speaker 3: still localized, but there was an unfortunate turn of events.
Speaker 3: But there's another point that I think to a degree
Speaker 3: fulfills or supports or emphasizes the cover up. So that
Speaker 3: SoundBite you heard, as I said, was July was it?
Speaker 3: May it? Which is lot July twenty twenty twenty two?
Speaker 3: July twenty, twenty twenty two. Let's go to July eighth,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. All right. Memorandum for Kreem Jean Pierre,
Speaker 3: White House Press Secretary from doctor Kevin O'Connor, physician to
Speaker 3: the President on White House Stationary physician to the President
Speaker 3: the White House. I wanted to share with you background
Speaker 3: on white Doctor Kevin Canard visited the White House to
Speaker 3: protect patient privacy for the thousands of patients of the
Speaker 3: White House Medical Union and the physicians who treat them,
Speaker 3: we do not disclode We normally we do not disclose
Speaker 3: the names of the specialists we work with. However, in
Speaker 3: the interests of accuracy, I have obtained permission from the
Speaker 3: President and doctor Canard to confirm the details I am sharing.
Speaker 3: Doctor Canard has been the neurology consulting to the White
Speaker 3: House Medical Unit since twenty twelve. He was chosen to
Speaker 3: be this consultant for his breadth of experience and expertise
Speaker 3: across the specialty of neurology, Prior to his movement disorders
Speaker 3: and fellowship at Emory, he had practiced as a general
Speaker 3: neurologist for six years. He is the longest serving neurologist
Speaker 3: at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and in the
Speaker 3: military healthcare system. He's been a member of the faculty
Speaker 3: at the Uniform Services University's Medical School since nineteen ninety one.
Speaker 3: His core faculty of the Neurology Residency program. And it
Speaker 3: just goes on to describe all of his academics, all
Speaker 3: of his credentials. Doctor Gnnard is a top neurological specialist.
Speaker 3: So doctor Connor continues in his letter of July eighth,
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four to the Press Secretary, as I have
Speaker 3: written in each of these presidents medical reports. As part
Speaker 3: of the President's annual physical he sees a team as
Speaker 3: specialists that have included optometry, dentistry, orthopedics, orthopedics, orthopedics for
Speaker 3: the spine, physical therapy, neurology, sleep medicine, cardiology, radiology, and dermatology.
Speaker 3: Doctor Cannard was one of the neurological specialists that examined
Speaker 3: President Biden for each of his annual physicals. His findings
Speaker 3: have been made public each time I've released the results
Speaker 3: of the president's annual physical, President Biden has not seen
Speaker 3: a neurologist outside of his annual physical. He then writes
Speaker 3: this in the letter. The results of this year's exam
Speaker 3: were detailed in my February twenty eight letter quote. An
Speaker 3: extremely detailed neurological exam was again reassuring that there were
Speaker 3: no findings which would be consistent with any cerebella or
Speaker 3: other central neurological disorder such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's,
Speaker 3: or ascending lateral sclerosis. Nor are there any signs of
Speaker 3: any cervical myelopathy. The assist exam did again support of
Speaker 3: finding a peripheral neuropathy in both feet. It's kind of
Speaker 3: interesting because the gate the way he walks would say otherwise,
Speaker 3: but I'm not the doctor. No motor weakness was detected.
Speaker 3: Did you watch him walk? He exhibited no tremor either
Speaker 3: at rest or with activity. He demonstrates excellent fine motor dexterity.
Speaker 3: Really oh, but a subtle difference in heat or cold
Speaker 3: sensation could be elicited, as it was last year. This
Speaker 3: heat cold sensation deficit was detected a couple of inches
Speaker 3: higher on his ankle calf this year, which is not unexpected.
Speaker 3: There may in fact be day to day subjective variation
Speaker 3: of these findings, as during last year's exam, this area
Speaker 3: of since sensation deficit was actually found to be smaller
Speaker 3: than the year before. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 3: So he saw a neurologist and he also had a
Speaker 3: radiological exam radiological for that's rays, uh, plenoscopy. But what
Speaker 3: was radiological exam? See, we just took this letter when
Speaker 3: it was released as them trying to say there's no
Speaker 3: neurological disorder, although we have records that the neurologists kept
Speaker 3: showing up at the White House all the time.
Speaker 6: Good money, Michael and Dragon, this is your favorite Jude goober.
Speaker 6: As you know, I have prost take cancer and that
Speaker 6: it just didn't happen over night, and I kind of
Speaker 6: any I could have missed it.
Speaker 2: So now I got five years or less to that.
Speaker 6: How can the President of the United States not get
Speaker 6: screened or bust their cancer? We can just happen, all right,
Speaker 6: have a good day.
Speaker 3: And we continue to wish you well. Some of the
Speaker 3: text messages I think don't take your conspiracy theories too far.
Speaker 5: And we're always down for a good conspiracy theory around here,
Speaker 5: but let's probably be a little bit more skeptical on
Speaker 5: conspiracy theories on this one.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the timing of this one, the timing can totally
Speaker 2: go after that.
Speaker 3: The timing is the thing to go after. For example,
Speaker 3: I'll keep the scuba number confidential only because I'm not
Speaker 3: trying to embarrass anybody. But we all know that Biden
Speaker 3: doesn't have cancer. This is an attempt to cover up
Speaker 3: just how bad his dementia really is. They don't want
Speaker 3: the people to know just how bad he was. God
Speaker 3: knows the Democrats would never lie. Exclamation points. Well, I
Speaker 3: think he does have cancer, and I actually think he's
Speaker 3: probably had cancer for quite some time. Just as when
Speaker 3: you go back to the July twenty four thou dost
Speaker 3: protest too much from doctor Cannard, the White House physician,
Speaker 3: talking about the specialists coming in from Walter Reid for neurology,
Speaker 3: and also they're they're explaining same in that very same
Speaker 3: letter that he had also had rated. You know, he
Speaker 3: had been been seen by a radiologist, which could be
Speaker 3: for any number of things. But everything starts to fall
Speaker 3: into place. I sincerely believe that he has the cancer.
Speaker 3: I think they've known of the cancer for quite some time,
Speaker 3: perhaps even back when he spoke and made that comment
Speaker 3: where everybody thought it was a you know, oh look
Speaker 3: he's made a gaff again. I'm not sure it was
Speaker 3: a gaff. I think it's one of those situations where
Speaker 3: you're just talking and you let the truth slip.
Speaker 4: Out and guess what the first frost, you know what
Speaker 4: was happening. It had to put on your windshild wipers
Speaker 4: to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's
Speaker 4: why I have so damn any other people I grew
Speaker 4: up had cancer, and why Camp For the longest time,
Speaker 4: Teller had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Speaker 3: Now he has had some sort of melanoma, he's had
Speaker 3: some of the you know, the spots removed of the
Speaker 3: skin cancer. He could have been referring to that, but
Speaker 3: he could and I don't know the timeline on that,
Speaker 3: so I can't confirm or deny that. But I believe
Speaker 3: that he probably had been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Perhaps
Speaker 3: they were trying to treat it it was much more
Speaker 3: aggressive than they knew. It got out of hand or
Speaker 3: they made a decision not to treat it, or you
Speaker 3: have the third option, and that is nobody checked him.
Speaker 3: And and to doctor Quay's point, for the President of
Speaker 3: the United States, maybe maybe not for me, maybe not
Speaker 3: for you, maybe not for our friend that currently has
Speaker 3: prostate cancer, but for the president of the United States
Speaker 3: who gets amazing medical care.
Speaker 2: Amazing.
Speaker 3: I think about what I pay for my concierge medicine,
Speaker 3: for both my PCP and my anti aging doctor, and
Speaker 3: the types of scans that I get sometimes duplicated between
Speaker 3: the two doctors. And I'll tell them that, and I'll say, like,
Speaker 3: you know, I had this gun scanned done by doctor
Speaker 3: so and so doctor X, do you really want to
Speaker 3: do it, because doctor why has already done it. Yes,
Speaker 3: I want to do it. You're paying for it anyway.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, it's part of your fees that
Speaker 3: you pay, so let's do it. And uh, well, well
Speaker 3: it'll be a redundant check. And I'm like, Okay, that's
Speaker 3: fine with me because my objective is to stay as
Speaker 3: healthy and vibrant as long as I can. And I'm
Speaker 3: just a plead. I'm just a surf and this giant
Speaker 3: sea of taxpayers that are being steamrolled by the federal government.
Speaker 3: The President of the United States is not that person.
Speaker 3: He gets the finest quality healthcare. And when I say that,
Speaker 3: that includes regular checkups. And you know, the President in
Speaker 3: the middle of the night has a headache and tells
Speaker 3: doctor Jill Biden he wants to not be profen or
Speaker 3: he wants to tailand all or sed of medicine or something.
Speaker 3: H She probably you know, notates that somehow the White
Speaker 3: House physician knows that the President took so might be
Speaker 3: profile last night. I mean, it's it's like everything is
Speaker 3: constantly checked, and there's constantly a physician wherever he goes
Speaker 3: every time. You know, I'm I met the White House
Speaker 3: doctor several times on Air Force One. He'd be out,
Speaker 3: you know, just walking around or studying or you know,
Speaker 3: I'd see him reading some medical journal or whatever, and
Speaker 3: I walk on. I walked up one time, introduced myself
Speaker 3: and let's coming out. I got to know him. So
Speaker 3: it's just it's the conspiracy is probably the malpractice, the
Speaker 3: cover up, and of course the timing, because we have
Speaker 3: all of these things starting to occur, and I do
Speaker 3: believe that this is a serious cover up. It's actually
Speaker 3: probably the most dangerous cover up in the history of
Speaker 3: the presidency. As I said Saturday, I think this cover
Speaker 3: up now. You have to remember Saturday, when I'm doing
Speaker 3: the show from noon to three Eastern time, tend to
Speaker 3: tend to one here in Colorado. I did not yet
Speaker 3: know about this cancer diagnosis. And I said on Saturday
Speaker 3: that I believe that the cover up about his mental
Speaker 3: state was worse than Watergate. And then boom, after I
Speaker 3: finished the show on Saturday, we learn on Sunday that
Speaker 3: oh my gosh, he has prostate cancer that's aggressive, that
Speaker 3: is metastasized to the bone. And so I would revise
Speaker 3: and I would revise my comments. You know, I would
Speaker 3: reclaim my time, just like the bunch of dumbass congressmen.
Speaker 3: I would reclaim my time and ask to revise and
Speaker 3: extend my comments for the record. That all of this
Speaker 3: now is probably the most dangerous cover up in the
Speaker 3: history of the presidency and is much worse than Watergate.
Speaker 4: I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms
Speaker 4: of my health and all aspects of my health.
Speaker 2: You know what that was.
Speaker 3: That's probably back in twenty nineteen or twenty twenty, when
Speaker 3: he was actually campaigning before he was president.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm pretty sure that was during the campaign. So
Speaker 2: it was twenty twenty.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well it could have been to twenty nineteen, twenty
Speaker 3: twenty sometimes in that timeframe. And don't forget that last summer,
Speaker 3: doctor O'Connor swore to the American people that Joe Biden
Speaker 3: was quote completely fit for the presidency. There were no issues,
Speaker 3: there was nothing to see. And then suddenly we learned
Speaker 3: that he has advanced metastasized prostate cancer. But wait, because
Speaker 3: advanced prostate cancer takes maybe sometimes ten years to develop
Speaker 3: to the stage where Biden's current diagnosis is. Prostate cancer
Speaker 3: is also easy to find. Simple blood tests, a prostate
Speaker 3: exam will give you near one accurate results. So you're
Speaker 3: telling me that the best doctors and the best testing
Speaker 3: on earth did not find Biden's cancer in all those
Speaker 3: years of testing. Was every medical report a lie? Did
Speaker 3: they not even do the test? Was that the problem
Speaker 3: was the family refusing to have him examined. Did he
Speaker 3: not really get a full physical examination? It's all bs it.
Speaker 3: I think they knew, I think they lied. I think
Speaker 3: they hit it and they did it for power. And
Speaker 3: I'm gonna say something stupid here because nothing will ever happen.
Speaker 3: And that is that people need to be held accountable
Speaker 3: for it because it's actually evil. It is truly evil,
Speaker 3: you know I it's I'm to the point where I
Speaker 3: you know what, you had that feeling that you just
Speaker 3: dodged a death inflicting bullet. It's a feeling of deja vu.
Speaker 3: It's a feeling of a sudden lifting of anxiety, or
Speaker 3: it's a feeling of that fleeting where you realized, oh,
Speaker 3: something bad could have just happened and it didn't. Or
Speaker 3: you think back on some time when something bad could
Speaker 3: have happened, or maybe something did happen but it wasn't
Speaker 3: nearly as bad as it could have been. That's the
Speaker 3: feeling I have about this presidency. The feeding I have
Speaker 3: is that, particularly when we go back and we discuss
Speaker 3: and think about the her report and the audio, which
Speaker 3: we'll cover some today too, that who was running the country.
Speaker 3: What if Putin had? I said to a friend yesterday,
Speaker 3: what if Putin had We were talking about all these stories,
Speaker 3: and I said, what if Putin decided that it wasn't
Speaker 3: just Ukraine. He wanted all of Eastern Europe. He wanted
Speaker 3: to get the Balkans back. He wanted to pull him back,
Speaker 3: and so he had. He had lined everybody up, he'd
Speaker 3: lined all his troops up all across the Eastern Front,
Speaker 3: and then on that day and February had decided not
Speaker 3: to move just on Ukraine, but to move on Poland.
Speaker 3: Who was making the decisions on that day? And remember
Speaker 3: Biden at one point said, you know, we maybe facing
Speaker 3: a minor incursion. Three years later as a minor incursion,
Speaker 3: it's it's it's trench warfare where hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 3: people are dying. And I think we bought dodge the bullet.
Speaker 3: And I imagine Vladimir Putin himself is hearing all of
Speaker 3: these stories, thinking about everything in hindsight, and in his
Speaker 3: twenty twenty vision, is thinking to himself, hell's bills. I
Speaker 3: should have taken Poland. I should have gone after the Balkans.
Speaker 3: I should have gone after you know, Moldova. I should
Speaker 3: have gone after all of them. That's how dangerous this is.
Speaker 7: I want the president to be treated like my brother was.
Speaker 7: They found his prosit cancer during COVID and to treat
Speaker 7: him for a year. Now he is a Glutien score
Speaker 7: of nine and that's to his prim and his Oh
Speaker 7: good enough for him, good enough for Biden.
Speaker 6: Ooh oh.
Speaker 3: I don't get me wrong, ma'am. I fully understand your
Speaker 3: feelings about that goober number eighty seven thirty four, Michael.
Speaker 3: Holding somebody accountable for this is going to take a
Speaker 3: miracle exactly. We all know what kind of people they are.
Speaker 3: The American people have now heard, so have now heard,
Speaker 3: so hopefully they will step up.
Speaker 7: No, I.
Speaker 3: Don't get me wrong. I'm in a great mood this morning,
Speaker 3: slept well, had a good weekend, but I'm not very
Speaker 3: optimistic about the country. Hopefully Sleepy Joe will just fall
Speaker 3: asleep one day, we'll send them off the military honors
Speaker 3: and be done. The United States of American knows who
Speaker 3: is running the country when Sleepy Joe is sick. Really,
Speaker 3: I mean, I want to know the names. I know
Speaker 3: that Barack Obama I don't know. But is my firm
Speaker 3: belief that Barack Obama was calling the shots and those
Speaker 3: shots were being delivered through his staff that were holdovers
Speaker 3: in the Biden administration. But you also have doctor Jill Biden,
Speaker 3: you have Hunter Biden, you have James Biden, you have
Speaker 3: Ashley Biden. You have the entire Biden Plan ninety one
Speaker 3: seventy seven. Michael, Now we will be led to believe
Speaker 3: this is a special and rare cancel cancer that is
Speaker 3: more aggressive than a cancer that would have been detected
Speaker 3: in the normal labs. What do we believe now? More gaslighting?
Speaker 3: I don't think they're going to. I mean, as this
Speaker 3: story develops, and I don't know that it will develop
Speaker 3: any further. This may have been a one shot thing.
Speaker 3: I mean, if, for example, truly if this is the
Speaker 3: case that he's had it for quite a while, which
Speaker 3: I mean, everything I've read from every doctor I can find,
Speaker 3: every oncologist that I can read about, has commented one
Speaker 3: way or another that this is highly unlikely that this
Speaker 3: was just discovered, and that if it was just discovered,
Speaker 3: that is genuinely medical malpractice. Because a metastatic prostate cancer
Speaker 3: develops over years. It just it just doesn't show up
Speaker 3: in your lymph nodes and your bones and your liver
Speaker 3: and everywhere else one day. And that's why colonoscopies, PSA tests,
Speaker 3: that's why physical exams bend over, that's why every man
Speaker 3: knows we go through all of these things.
Speaker 2: What I don't believe that.
Speaker 3: It's it's going to be some special or rare cancer,
Speaker 3: because I think the family will shut down now. They've
Speaker 3: they've shifted the story although the book hasn't been you know,
Speaker 3: the Tapper and Johnson book has not been released until
Speaker 3: I think the twenty maybe it's maybe it's tomorrow, sometime
Speaker 3: this week. I think maybe Tuesday. That will stir up
Speaker 3: all of those stories again. But the family has a
Speaker 3: reason now to shut down and isolate. Now. I don't know,
Speaker 3: because I find both of them, the President and doctor
Speaker 3: Jill Biden, to be real kind of DC creatures, the
Speaker 3: weird kind of DC creatures that totally seek the spotlight
Speaker 3: and the limelight all the time. But the way this
Speaker 3: was handled, everything that we don't know up to yesterday,
Speaker 3: indicates to me that it was designed to knock the
Speaker 3: other stories, take the wind out of stories, get some
Speaker 3: sympathy for something they've known for quite a while, and
Speaker 3: shut down because remember, if the really if the release
Speaker 3: of the Taper Johnson book is tomorrow, Uh, it's gonna
Speaker 3: be pretty hard in these quarters. But some quarters to
Speaker 3: really discuss the President's neurological problems, Willy's suffering from