Speaker 1: Later tonight, Kamala Harris will be giving her first sit
Speaker 1: down interview since becoming the Democrat nominee. Now, she's not
Speaker 1: going to be doing said interview alone, because apparently, even
Speaker 1: though they think she's qualified to be the president of
Speaker 1: the United States, she needs a babysitter in order to
Speaker 1: give an interview with the big, bad, mean media. She's
Speaker 1: going to give this interview with Dana Bash of CNN,
Speaker 1: so it's not like she's going in a hostile territory
Speaker 1: to give this interview. But it doesn't matter. They don't
Speaker 1: trust that Kamala's going to be able to carry herself
Speaker 1: on her own. They don't trust that she's going to
Speaker 1: be able to give nothing but good soundbites. So of
Speaker 1: course they have to bring her chuckle buddy Tim Walls
Speaker 1: mate into the interview with her, because God forbid, she
Speaker 1: proved to the American public that she's fit for the
Speaker 1: job by conducting an interview all by her lonesome. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake about that, this is all by design. The
Speaker 1: fact that CNN agreed to this shows you just how
Speaker 1: ridiculously biased they are. She needs to prove that she
Speaker 1: can sit down before the American public and conduct a
Speaker 1: simple interview. She needs to hold a press conference where
Speaker 1: she's asked questions and she has to answer them. Not
Speaker 1: a running mate, not a press secretary, not a campaign spokesperson.
Speaker 1: But we want to hear from Vice President Harris. We
Speaker 1: all know that some of the worst moments of her
Speaker 1: entire political career come during these live moments, these moments
Speaker 1: that couldn't be edited later to make her appear better.
Speaker 1: So now to try to give her that cover in
Speaker 1: comes old folksy Tim Walls. You know, that extreme socialist
Speaker 1: leftist that the media is trying to tell us is
Speaker 1: the moderate, middle of the road, maybe even right leaning moderate.
Speaker 1: He's not the same way that she's not the candidate
Speaker 1: of change, considering the fact she's part of the current administration.
Speaker 1: But these are the games that the Democrats and the
Speaker 1: media are playing with us, and the fact that the
Speaker 1: media continues to let her get away with this is
Speaker 1: absurd to me. Now, as I just mentioned mentioned on
Speaker 1: the latest episode of Chris McDaniel's America, this is not
Speaker 1: going unnoticed by our friends abroad. The BBC calls it out.
Speaker 1: Folks are seeing exactly who she is, and it's embarrassing.
Speaker 1: What's Even more embarrassing is the fact that she has
Speaker 1: a better than average chance at winning this election, which
Speaker 1: what does that say about the intelligence of the American electorate.
Speaker 1: It's not an endorsement of her intelligence. I can assure
Speaker 1: you of that, because this woman has no business being
Speaker 1: the Democrat nominee. If she had run in an open
Speaker 1: primary setup like she tried to do four years ago,
Speaker 1: she wouldn't have been your nominee. The fact that it
Speaker 1: had to be handed to her, the fact that they
Speaker 1: have to try to pretend that she is the stellar,
Speaker 1: outstanding candidate, should tell you all you need to know
Speaker 1: about her. She's not. If she were, this interview tomorrow
Speaker 1: would be the Kamala Harris Show. There would be no
Speaker 1: Tim Wall sitting there holding her hand through this. He
Speaker 1: wouldn't be needed to answer the tough questions and try
Speaker 1: to make sure she doesn't come across like she's a
Speaker 1: character on Sesame Street as much as she has in
Speaker 1: the past. But they know how flawed she is, and
Speaker 1: they know that if they don't do it this way,
Speaker 1: Harris will look ridiculous. They're also currently trying to come
Speaker 1: up with whatever they can to try to get out
Speaker 1: of the debates or change the rules of the debates.
Speaker 1: There is a huge fight right now over muting the mics.
Speaker 1: Muting the mics in the Trump Biden debate was one
Speaker 1: of the smartest moves and something I have advocated for
Speaker 1: for years. It cuts down on the chaos. It forces
Speaker 1: the people the person being asked the question to focus
Speaker 1: on that and his opponent has to wait their turn,
Speaker 1: is common sense. Kamala and her team doesn't want that anymore,
Speaker 1: mainly because they're hoping that Kamala can be interrupted and
Speaker 1: she can throw out an ad lib like she did
Speaker 1: against Pence four years ago. The other thing they're banking on,
Speaker 1: of course, is that Trump will come across as being
Speaker 1: mean to a woman, and that's going to be their
Speaker 1: whole mo And that's part of why they don't want
Speaker 1: this microphones muted. Because the microphones are muted, it's kind
Speaker 1: of hard for them to paint Trump in that negative
Speaker 1: light like they want to. Guys, I can tell you
Speaker 1: right now that if this were a Republican candidate and
Speaker 1: the Republican was refusing to give an interview with the media,
Speaker 1: and then when they finally did agree to an interview
Speaker 1: with the media, said you know what, I'm gonna do it,
Speaker 1: but only if my running mate can sit in the
Speaker 1: media would be chastising them, and justifiably so. I can
Speaker 1: tell you this if this were a Republican candidate saying
Speaker 1: that no, no, I know, we've already agreed to these rules,
Speaker 1: but I now want these rules to clearly state that
Speaker 1: the microphone stays on. I want these rules to change
Speaker 1: for my benefit. Do you think the media would be
Speaker 1: defending the moves the way that they have for Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris or do you think that they'd call it out?
Speaker 1: You know the answer, they'd call it out. This media
Speaker 1: biased is so absurd, and the fact that they want
Speaker 1: to sit there with their self righteous, smug attitudes and
Speaker 1: pretend that they are an objective, unbiased sorts is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: They gave that up sometime in the seventies and eighties.
Speaker 1: The moment the news media is decided to become for
Speaker 1: profit was the moment that we lost an objective, unbiased
Speaker 1: news media. The moment they decided to push liberal agenda
Speaker 1: and liberal politics. That is the moment the news media
Speaker 1: in this country died, and they're showing it on full
Speaker 1: display during this presidential race as they continue to prop
Speaker 1: up their fake phony candidate, a candidate that was unelected
Speaker 1: to the nomination, and they will do whatever they can
Speaker 1: and lie however much they need to to protect Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: This has been morning Coffee with the Right Side, and
Speaker 1: I'm your host, Jack Fairchilds and we're a part of
Speaker 1: the Midnight Ride Network.