Speaker 1: The question isn't are you a conspiracy theorist or are
Speaker 1: you not a conspiracy theorist?
Speaker 2: The question is are you a conspiracy theorist or are
Speaker 2: you fucking brain down cinematic lack of momion.
Speaker 3: I'm a conspiracy theorist, Dave, all right, you caught me.
Speaker 3: Look that whole label. Just need you need to embrace
Speaker 3: it or just like not let it bother you at
Speaker 3: a minimum.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 3: Because powerful people, people in positions of power, conspire. Guess what,
Speaker 3: People that aren't in positions of power conspire to. Drug
Speaker 3: dealers conspire all the time. Basically a conspiracy. Setting aside
Speaker 3: the theory aspect of it, a conspiracy is just people
Speaker 3: interacting in secret for nefarious purposes, usually criminal purposes. So yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm a conspiracy theorist. People conspire, And guess what. The
Speaker 3: richest and most powerful people ever absolutely conspire. And most
Speaker 3: of them didn't get to that position of being the
Speaker 3: richest and most powerful people on the planet, if not
Speaker 3: in human history, by not conspiring. Many of them got
Speaker 3: there by conspiring. So this is I'm just sick to death.
Speaker 3: I am so sick of people discarding any sort of
Speaker 3: conversation about this topic based off of Oh, you're a
Speaker 3: conspiracy Sure, yeah, I am. They conspired. There's tremendous amounts
Speaker 3: of evidence to prove that they did. Okay, So, despite
Speaker 3: what the Age of the United States of America says,
Speaker 3: despite what the head of the FBI says, despite what
Speaker 3: the second in command that the FBI says, despite what
Speaker 3: the President of the United States says, they conspired. That's
Speaker 3: a fact. I'll show you. I'll prove it. Okay, don't
Speaker 3: take my word for it. Why is the FBI protecting
Speaker 3: the largest scale pederist in human history?
Speaker 4: Simple because of who's on that list. You don't think
Speaker 4: that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress and to prevent the
Speaker 4: disclosure of that list. And why is it that the Senate?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 4: And good for Senator Blackburn to try to get it out.
Speaker 4: But then Dick Turbin comes over the top and says, no, oh,
Speaker 4: we're not going to release the names. I don't care
Speaker 4: about the list itself, but if released the names, right
Speaker 4: and I've said it, Dan Bongino said it. We've reviewed
Speaker 4: all the information, and the American Republic is going to
Speaker 4: get as much as we can release. He killed himself.
Speaker 4: Do you think, let's play out the logical conclusion of this.
Speaker 4: Do you think that myself, Bongino and others would participate
Speaker 4: in hiding information about Epstein's grow test activities or do
Speaker 4: you think we would also participate in not prosecuting people
Speaker 4: we had evidence to prosecute people on where's the videotape
Speaker 4: of a Nipsteen Island of X, Y and Z committing
Speaker 4: these frauds? Why haven't you given it to us? Do
Speaker 4: you really think I wouldn't give that to you if
Speaker 4: it existed?
Speaker 3: Ah, Cash, Actually, I don't think you would give it
Speaker 3: to me. And the proof of that is that you're
Speaker 3: not giving it to me. And do I think that
Speaker 3: you have it? Yeah? I do. Actually, I'm not one
Speaker 3: hundred percent sure that you have it particularly, but do
Speaker 3: does someone in your department or someone at the CIA
Speaker 3: have it? Absolutely? So I'm sick of the I already
Speaker 3: did an entire episode breaking down exactly how Cash Mattel
Speaker 3: lied in his own words, between him before he gets
Speaker 3: to be the head of the FBI and then after
Speaker 3: once he is the head of the FBI. That Rogan
Speaker 3: appearance was devastating for his credibility. It was at that
Speaker 3: point which I basically abandoned any hope that there was
Speaker 3: going to be a legitimate investigation of this, and I
Speaker 3: was right. So for those that don't know, I haven't
Speaker 3: even given you the intro here. Last night there was
Speaker 3: an axios leak of a DOJ report that basically confirms
Speaker 3: what we all kind of unfortunately suspected that the case
Speaker 3: is closed, that there's nothing more to look at, there's
Speaker 3: no co conspirators, there's no evidence to do any additional prosecutions.
Speaker 3: It's over. Nothing to see here, go home. Why would
Speaker 3: you even think that there might be a new sheriff
Speaker 3: in town that brings justice to you and your family?
Speaker 3: Not going to happen. I am to put it. I
Speaker 3: can't even put into words how upset I am, honestly
Speaker 3: when I saw the leak first off, like the leak
Speaker 3: itself was not signed by Pam Bondi, and there was
Speaker 3: some basically copium that was going around the interwebs for
Speaker 3: a while saying maybe it's fake, maybe this is a
Speaker 3: doctored document, and in fact xeo's got it wrong. Well, no,
Speaker 3: we now have confirmation from the White House that yeah,
Speaker 3: they're not doing any further investigations.
Speaker 2: Caroline.
Speaker 1: The DOJNFI now concluded there was no Jeffrey Epstein client list.
Speaker 1: What do you tell Nagas supporters who say they want
Speaker 1: anyone involved in Jeffrey Epstein's alleged crimes to be held accountable.
Speaker 5: This administration wants anyone who has ever committed a crime
Speaker 5: to be held accountable. And I would argue this administration
Speaker 5: has done more to lock up bad guys than certainly
Speaker 5: the previous administration. And the Trump administration is committed to
Speaker 5: truth and to transparency. That's why the Attorney General and
Speaker 5: the FBI Director pledged, at the President's direction, to do
Speaker 5: an exhaustive review of all of the files related to
Speaker 5: Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and his death, and they put out
Speaker 5: a memo in conclusion of that review. There was material
Speaker 5: they did not release because, frankly, it was incredibly graphic.
Speaker 3: Tell me the difference there between Carolyn Levitt and Kareem
Speaker 3: John Pierre, because I can't see it. I can't see
Speaker 3: a difference at all. I see a paid propagandist lying
Speaker 3: to the American people to cover up for the worst
Speaker 3: of the worst amongst us. That's what I see. A
Speaker 3: bald faced lie right up there with Joe Biden being
Speaker 3: sharp as attack. He's never been more brilliant. He has
Speaker 3: no speech, It's just a stutter. I mean, that's what
Speaker 3: we're watching. And I'm telling you, any political pundit out there,
Speaker 3: any talking head, any influencer, any politician that doesn't have
Speaker 3: the cahonas to call this out for what it is,
Speaker 3: the most obvious cover up in my lifetime. If they
Speaker 3: don't have the balls to talk about this honestly, to
Speaker 3: call it out for what it is, you should never
Speaker 3: listen to them again, None of them ever. This is pathology.
Speaker 3: Either they are paid disinformation agents or they're so dumb
Speaker 3: it doesn't make a difference because they might as well be.
Speaker 3: That's where we're at, and there are a lot basically
Speaker 3: talking points that are circulating right now that says, oh,
Speaker 3: you know, look, I didn't support Trump specifically over the
Speaker 3: Epstein case. What I'm really concerned with is the border.
Speaker 3: What I'm really concerned with is, I don't know, getting
Speaker 3: the economy humming again. So as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 3: as long as he does that, he has delivered on
Speaker 3: his promises. Sorry, not good enough, not good enough, cash
Speaker 3: matel Dan Bongino and Pambondy all made promises, explicit promises
Speaker 3: here I'll show you now.
Speaker 6: I saw your appearance at Cepack with Ben and with
Speaker 6: Ted Cruz and one of the things that you alluded to,
Speaker 6: and this is something Donald Trump has talked about. The
Speaker 6: DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Well,
Speaker 6: that really happened.
Speaker 7: Sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been
Speaker 7: a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing
Speaker 7: JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process of
Speaker 7: being reviewed because that was done at the directive of
Speaker 7: the president from all of these agencies.
Speaker 6: So so have you seen anything that you said, Oh,
Speaker 6: my gosh, not yet. Okay, well we'll check back with you.
Speaker 3: That was February twenty first, That was four and a
Speaker 3: half months ago, something like that. Long time ago. Okay,
Speaker 3: she had time to review. And according to the DOJ
Speaker 3: leaked memo today, there's nothing. According to Carolyn Levitt, the
Speaker 3: White House spokes whole, there is no list. There is
Speaker 3: nobody else to prosecute, there's nobody else to go after.
Speaker 3: So what you have is a guy who procured over
Speaker 3: a thousand victims of his trafficking operation for himself. And
Speaker 3: that's it. That's the narration that they're going with. There's
Speaker 3: nobody else, There's nobody else on earth. Despite the fact
Speaker 3: that Epstein had contacts and serious relationships with dozens, probably
Speaker 3: hundreds of the most wealthy and powerful people all over
Speaker 3: the world, all throughout politics, all throughout Hollywood, academia, everything,
Speaker 3: every institution. Basically he had his fingers in everything. So
Speaker 3: you have him just trafficking to himself, which I guess
Speaker 3: isn't trafficking. He's just a serial pervert. He then, obviously
Speaker 3: despite the fact that in two thousand and eight, he
Speaker 3: got this incredible sweetheart deal after purchasing a child an
Speaker 3: underage person for prostitution aka abuse. To put it mildly,
Speaker 3: he gets the deal of a lifetime where alex Acosta,
Speaker 3: who by the way, went into Trump's first presidential cabinet
Speaker 3: as the Labor secretary. This guy was the DA of Florida,
Speaker 3: and he cuts his sweetheart deal with Epstein where he
Speaker 3: gets to and I shit you not. It was like
Speaker 3: a couple of year sentence that he got out after
Speaker 3: thirteen months, but he also was allowed to leave for
Speaker 3: twelve hours a day. So a guy who acquired a
Speaker 3: child for that was allowed to leave his cell twelve
Speaker 3: hours a day to go to work. Oh and might
Speaker 3: i add According to Daily Beast reporting, alex Acosta also
Speaker 3: said that the reason he was told to give that
Speaker 3: sweetheart deal to Epstein was because he was connected to intelligence,
Speaker 3: and to quote back off. Now, Acosta has never confirmed
Speaker 3: that quote. He was asked about it. He was also
Speaker 3: put under the gun and said, hey, will you confirm
Speaker 3: or deny that Epstein was intelligence? And he would not answer,
Speaker 3: and then he immediately stepped down. And we haven't heard
Speaker 3: from the guy since. So, yeah, he was connected to intelligence.
Speaker 3: And anybody that won't say that is also a liar,
Speaker 3: a pathological liar, because it couldn't be more obvious. This
Speaker 3: guy that got a sweetheart deal back in eight who
Speaker 3: should have gone away for years, maybe a decade, he
Speaker 3: gets a year with twelve hours per day release into
Speaker 3: the wild, is obviously connected to intelligence. He then gets
Speaker 3: arrested in the late twenty teens, and well, basically he's
Speaker 3: facing trial. He takes his own life, right, that's the story.
Speaker 3: Why would he do that? There's only evidence of these
Speaker 3: tapes which you've already been charged and convicted on that,
Speaker 3: and you already got a sweetheart deal because of your
Speaker 3: relationship to the rich and powerful. You're just going to
Speaker 3: check out. You're not going to fight it in court.
Speaker 3: Anybody buying this. I've already done an episode in the past,
Speaker 3: which by the way, got demonetized because I showed photos
Speaker 3: of it. Sorry, I had to tell you the truth,
Speaker 3: basically debunking the idea that he did that to himself.
Speaker 3: So you guys can go check out that episode. I
Speaker 3: think it was the cash lied episode. But this guy,
Speaker 3: I don't believe it. I don't buy it for a second.
Speaker 3: I think, like, no, I can't prove it definitively because
Speaker 3: there's no footage, which, by the way, when this memo
Speaker 3: got leaked today, twelve hours of footage of the cell
Speaker 3: where Epstein was being kept was released to the public
Speaker 3: late last night, and there's really nothing to be seen there,
Speaker 3: but I'll show you a quick second of it. So
Speaker 3: a friend of the show, Chris Martinson, says, for the
Speaker 3: FBI DOJ to claim anything at all from the one
Speaker 3: working Epstein cell block video camera feed is infuriatingly insulting.
Speaker 3: Here's the data his best I can tell lining things up,
Speaker 3: Only a sliver of a corner of the stairs leading
Speaker 3: to Epstein's cell block is visible in this one lone
Speaker 3: working camera angle, so we don't know if a someone
Speaker 3: was already inside his cell block, or b if someone
Speaker 3: went up the right side of the staircase, or see
Speaker 3: if even the video feed was altered by Ahood Broos
Speaker 3: firm or even an FBI cover up crew. But even
Speaker 3: if we take it at face value, you can't possibly
Speaker 3: rule any scenario out from this camera angle. To state
Speaker 3: anything more declarative is utter bollocks. And essentially what they're
Speaker 3: saying is, I don't know if you're listening, you can't
Speaker 3: really tell, but like his cell is over here. I
Speaker 3: watched like ten minutes or so of the video just
Speaker 3: to see if there was anything worth seeing. The only
Speaker 3: thing of note was that there was in fact a
Speaker 3: singular minute that was cut and you could you could
Speaker 3: watch it in the feed. It jumps from I think
Speaker 3: it was like eleven fifty seven am to eleven fifty
Speaker 3: eight am and the minute is just gone, So there
Speaker 3: was obviously an edit done to the footage. But at
Speaker 3: this point, given what cash, Betel and Dan Bongino had
Speaker 3: been saying over the past month and a half as
Speaker 3: to look, we've reviewed everything. There's nothing there, There's no
Speaker 3: there there. We already knew this was coming, right, So
Speaker 3: if you expected the hallway footage, which Bongino promise was
Speaker 3: going to be released to the public, as if that
Speaker 3: was going to show us anything significant, obviously it wasn't.
Speaker 3: So it doesn't The fact that there's even in this
Speaker 3: benign footage that who knows if it's even real, there's
Speaker 3: still a minute that's cut out of it, is like, Oh,
Speaker 3: it's just such a such a lack of concern for
Speaker 3: the American people, for our interest, for our concerns. It's insulting.
Speaker 3: I feel like I'm like I'm being spat on all day,
Speaker 3: every day for months now, and I can't be alone
Speaker 3: and feeling this way. Like I know, my audience probably
Speaker 3: was fifty to fifty on whether or not they voted
Speaker 3: for Trump, but regardless like whether you did or you didn't,
Speaker 3: this is an insult to all of us to float
Speaker 3: delivering on justice and then to give nothing, particularly after
Speaker 3: you had promises by the head of the FBI, the
Speaker 3: second in command of the FBI, the ag all of
Speaker 3: which said justice is coming, disclosures are coming here, it is,
Speaker 3: it's coming. Just wait a couple more months. Look, we've
Speaker 3: only been here for a few weeks. We've only been
Speaker 3: here for a few months. We haven't even been here
Speaker 3: a year yet. Just give us time and then boom
Speaker 3: amble nothing. No prosecutions, no further disclosures. Here's some benign
Speaker 3: footage of a hallway that goes for twelve hours that
Speaker 3: you can't make heads or tails of and case closed.
Speaker 3: It's disgusting. It's one of the worst abuses of power,
Speaker 3: and just a diminishment of the justice system ri at large.
Speaker 3: That Like, honestly, if you're living in this country and
Speaker 3: you expect that people can do this to kids and
Speaker 3: get away with it, why would you expect the rest
Speaker 3: of us to honor your justice system, to honor your
Speaker 3: laws anything. It's it's bedlam, it's chaos, tyranny. It's disgusting.
Speaker 3: I am furious, honestly, Like I had to calm down.
Speaker 3: The only reason I'm able to even talk about this
Speaker 3: in some sort of coherent fashion is because I've done
Speaker 3: so many hours of spaces on it, and I've kind
Speaker 3: of allowed myself to just let the ideas and the
Speaker 3: emotions kind of percolate so I can get to some
Speaker 3: semblance of a rational discussion about this. But had I
Speaker 3: gone live last night when this news first dropped, it
Speaker 3: would have just been me yelling. It had just been
Speaker 3: me staring into the camera and screaming as loud as possible.
Speaker 3: I'm unbelievably angry. I'm amazed that there's not more public outcry.
Speaker 3: And by the way, corporate media hardly even touching it.
Speaker 3: They're pretending is if it's not a non story. There
Speaker 3: was no public interest in this at all, despite the
Speaker 3: fact that I know for a fact a huge swath
Speaker 3: of Trump supporters I'm not even talking about my people,
Speaker 3: the libertarian folks talking about Trump supporters specifically cared about
Speaker 3: this story, maybe more than anything. I mean, who with
Speaker 3: a soul doesn't care about getting child abusers and traffickers
Speaker 3: off the streets, especially if it's being used for blackmail.
Speaker 3: So let's get into why I believe it was being
Speaker 3: used for blackmail, because I've got to prove out some
Speaker 3: of my claims here because otherwise I just sound like
Speaker 3: a lunatic. There's a lot of evidence, a lot of
Speaker 3: fire that goes along with this smoke, let's go. So
Speaker 3: I did the research on this because I wanted to
Speaker 3: make sure that I had this accurate. So I'm not
Speaker 3: trying to lie to you guys. This is true, tracked, proven, documented,
Speaker 3: reported on by large media outlets. For the former Israeli
Speaker 3: Prime Minister Ahud Barrock met with Epstein thirty six times
Speaker 3: between twenty thirteen and twenty seventeen. This was after Epstein
Speaker 3: had been convicted of abusing a minor, which he got
Speaker 3: that sweetheart deal from Acosta in Florida. Brock was in
Speaker 3: the IDF for thirty five years, reached the highest level
Speaker 3: of the IDF, and he was also a member of
Speaker 3: the elite Syaret Metcal Unit, a special forces group known
Speaker 3: for and I quote, intelligence gathering and covert operations. Epstein's partner,
Speaker 3: Maxwell Gislaine, was the daughter of Robert Maxwell, a well known,
Speaker 3: well documented Massad agent. So anyone that is trying to
Speaker 3: claim that there is no connections between Epstein and Massad
Speaker 3: is just flat out lying. Now, that doesn't mean definitively
Speaker 3: that he was exclusively a Masad agent or asset. I'm
Speaker 3: not saying that he was. I think it's highly likely
Speaker 3: given that his operations were largely, if not entirely, being
Speaker 3: ran out of the United States, that obviously the CIA
Speaker 3: was involved. That's my read of things. Again, have to
Speaker 3: because we don't have a fucking DOJ and a functioning
Speaker 3: FBI to investigate these things, and because the people that
Speaker 3: are responsible for those investigations we're actually participating in this bullshit.
Speaker 3: You're gonna have to connect some dots. Okay, it's not
Speaker 3: going to be super clean, sign sealed delivered from some
Speaker 3: important person with a title in the government. That's the
Speaker 3: nature of government conspiracy is that you're going to have
Speaker 3: to do some of your own research and conclusions on this. Sorry.
Speaker 3: So this is where the people that only trust the
Speaker 3: New York Times or only trust a politician to tell
Speaker 3: them the truth about things are going to be upset.
Speaker 3: Grow the fuck up. The New York Times and politicians
Speaker 3: lie to you about half the time, if not more.
Speaker 6: So.
Speaker 3: Sometimes you're gonna have to put on your big boy
Speaker 3: pants and think for your fucking self. Here's what John Kiraku,
Speaker 3: a CIA agent who served from nineteen ninety two thousand
Speaker 3: and four, had to say about the Epstein case.
Speaker 8: What are the chances that Epstein was an intelligence construct
Speaker 8: of some sort.
Speaker 2: I think the chances are very very good. I've maintained
Speaker 2: from the very beginning that this has Mosad written all
Speaker 2: over it. Mosad is incredibly active on US soil, right,
Speaker 2: hundreds and hundreds of Israeli intelligence agents active across the
Speaker 2: United States at any given time. One of the things
Speaker 2: the Israelis are very good at is the cultivation and
Speaker 2: recruitment of what are called access agents. So let's say
Speaker 2: you want information from Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and
Speaker 2: Prince Andrew. Well, you're not going to recruit any of
Speaker 2: those people, so you do the next best thing. You
Speaker 2: recruit somebody who has access to all those people. Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein bore all the hallmarks of an Israeli access operation,
Speaker 2: besides the fact that he's Jewish. His relationship with Glenn Maxwell,
Speaker 2: whose father was also a Masad agent, a known Masat agent,
Speaker 2: leads me to believe that they kept it all in
Speaker 2: the family. His access continued to improve the wealthier he became.
Speaker 3: So this isn't exactly a big mystery as to what
Speaker 3: the incentive would be to do this. If you get people,
Speaker 3: you know, tech moguls, guys that run social media, guys
Speaker 3: who have fortune five hundred companies, big corporations that move
Speaker 3: not just a lot of resources, but I have a
Speaker 3: lot of power, a lot of political capital. If you
Speaker 3: get politicians, if you get members of the royal family
Speaker 3: like Prince Andrew, if you get presidents of the United States,
Speaker 3: former presidents of the United States, if you get all
Speaker 3: of these people in compromise positions, and you have them
Speaker 3: on video committing a act that they may or may
Speaker 3: not even know that they were doing willingly in terms
Speaker 3: of the age discretion. Maybe they thought that, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm on an island, I'm having vacation. My buddy over here.
Speaker 3: Epstein's got this prostitute for me, just gonna, you know,
Speaker 3: go do what scumbag politicians do. And then you come
Speaker 3: to find out he calls you up when you get
Speaker 3: home from the island and he goes, hey, Bud, I
Speaker 3: hate to break it to you. Or maybe it's not
Speaker 3: even him. It's probably not him. He probably just gives
Speaker 3: it off to his handlers, and then they contact them
Speaker 3: and they send them a screenshot of them in the
Speaker 3: act and they say this all goes away, but we
Speaker 3: need you to pass this bill that gives additional aid
Speaker 3: for XYZ, or we need you to vote against this,
Speaker 3: or we need you to come out and give us
Speaker 3: talking points on XYZ. This is very basic stuff. If
Speaker 3: you think that this isn't in the realm of capability
Speaker 3: for basically any intelligence agency, I think you're being very
Speaker 3: naive if you think that the top intelligence agencies, be
Speaker 3: that six, CIA, Massade, don't utilize tactics like this on
Speaker 3: the regular Again, extraordinarily naive. We know that they do.
Speaker 3: So it's just a matter of was he doing this
Speaker 3: for himself or was he doing this for intelligence? Well,
Speaker 3: I think it's important for you to ask yourself. He
Speaker 3: was doing it for decades. How how did he get
Speaker 3: away with it when he was caught red handed with
Speaker 3: an underage solicitation. Why did he get such a sweetheart deal?
Speaker 3: Why did the DA say that he gave him a
Speaker 3: sweetheart deal because he was connected to intelligence? Do we
Speaker 3: really have to connect more dots than this? Why would
Speaker 3: a former prime minister, former prime minister of our greatest
Speaker 3: ally visit him thirty six times after he had already
Speaker 3: been convicted. Why just because he's so charismatic, because he's
Speaker 3: such a great tax accountant, Or do you think maybe
Speaker 3: he was handing off the surveillance footage to him. Look,
Speaker 3: I know you're gonna have to connect some dots. I
Speaker 3: know some of you are going to just go lickd
Speaker 3: dog conspiracy arts crazy, You're so naughty, and the rest
Speaker 3: of you, the saye amongst us, are gonna go Yeah,
Speaker 3: Clim's obviously fucking right. This guy was obviously building compromont
Speaker 3: files against political allies, enemies, everybody across the board, corporate titans,
Speaker 3: tech titans, and then using that leverage to force their
Speaker 3: hand in whatever ways they desired. And I think this
Speaker 3: is the thirty thousand pound elephant in the room. Was
Speaker 3: Trump actually caught on tape? I don't know. Now. I've
Speaker 3: always thought to myself, given that the FBI was under
Speaker 3: Democrat control and they were doing everything in their power
Speaker 3: to remove Donald Trump, that they probably would have released
Speaker 3: that information just to destroy his political career. But given
Speaker 3: that they've now put such a tidy little bow on
Speaker 3: this by saying there's no additional prosecutions, in fact, there's
Speaker 3: not Donald Trump, there's not Bill Clinton, there's literally no
Speaker 3: one else on video that we are capable of prosecuting.
Speaker 3: That Now I'm thinking to myself, all right, maybe they
Speaker 3: didn't use it because like, to even admit that these
Speaker 3: files exist would then require for disclosure of more of
Speaker 3: the files and it would end up tarnishing them. So
Speaker 3: therefore they withheld it. But here's the thing that I
Speaker 3: also think is important to understand, because a lot of
Speaker 3: people are going, well, why wouldn't they Why wouldn't Trump
Speaker 3: have released it back in sixteen eighteen if you had it, Well,
Speaker 3: once you have these even if you're in opposition to
Speaker 3: the operation, if you get into a position of power, Well,
Speaker 3: first off, I don't think that Trump has actual ultimate
Speaker 3: authority to do these disclosures and things like that. Sorry
Speaker 3: to break it to you, but once you've gone through
Speaker 3: all this really life threatening effort to get these people
Speaker 3: in compromise position and to have this footage and to
Speaker 3: have this blackmail material, do you turn that over to
Speaker 3: the public and do you turn it over to an
Speaker 3: AG or a DA and allow for them to actually
Speaker 3: prosecute these people. No, even if it wasn't Trump that
Speaker 3: ordered the operation, it's highly probable that once they had
Speaker 3: the files, assuming that they did so. According to Panbondy,
Speaker 3: she did have them, including thousands of tapes. Regardless, Once
Speaker 3: you have this information, do you then use this against
Speaker 3: your enemies? That's another great question that could It could
Speaker 3: be as simple as that. Maybe he got into it,
Speaker 3: like it's the whole meme of getting the ring and
Speaker 3: staring at it and you're like, no, throw it into
Speaker 3: the fire, and it's like, no, I can control it.
Speaker 3: Maybe that's what we're looking at. Not sure. Regardless, I
Speaker 3: don't care. I don't care about the political angling, the finagling,
Speaker 3: the building compromise or compromise on your enemies to try
Speaker 3: and get your political ambitions fulfilled. I don't care. Children
Speaker 3: were violated by the most wealthy, powerful, influential, and dangerous
Speaker 3: people on the planet and they are still in power
Speaker 3: because the people in power today won't do their fucking jobs.
Speaker 3: But I don't think that cash, Betel and Bongino and
Speaker 3: Pambondi are all on the tapes. I think that they're
Speaker 3: doing their jobs. I think that they are basically put
Speaker 3: in those positions to do cover ups, to keep files
Speaker 3: that have compromising information so they can be used by
Speaker 3: the deep state, by the establishment, whatever you want to
Speaker 3: phrase it as to continue to apply pressure to the
Speaker 3: powers that be within the government, the elected representatives that
Speaker 3: actually don't vote or don't seem to have any concern
Speaker 3: for our interest whatsoever. I think that's actually how this
Speaker 3: game is played, and it's disgusting and I have zero
Speaker 3: patients for it. I have zero mercy for anyone that
Speaker 3: would bite their tongue or worse, lie to perpetuate this
Speaker 3: sick system. It's demonic, I'll say it. This is as
Speaker 3: low as it gets. Thousands of victims. Now, I don't
Speaker 3: know exactly how many of them were underage. I know
Speaker 3: many of them were of age, and they did so,
Speaker 3: you know, quote unquote voluntarily, But there's a lot of
Speaker 3: underage victims here. And anybody, as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 3: anybody in the establishment that is lying to continue this
Speaker 3: cover up is beyond despised in my eyes. Honestly, they
Speaker 3: ought to resign. And honestly, if Trump wasn't involved, which
Speaker 3: at this point, I don't think there's any chance that
Speaker 3: he's not greenlighting this cover up. But if he wasn't, well,
Speaker 3: he's got one play here. You have to fire Pambondi today,
Speaker 3: and you probably should fire both cash Hotel and Dan Bongino.
Speaker 3: And you ought to clean house more broadly than that.
Speaker 3: Everybody else in the intel establishment that permitted this, that
Speaker 3: covered it up, all of them have to go. Here's
Speaker 3: what the Legal Council to the President, Alena Haba said
Speaker 3: back in February.
Speaker 8: But in this case, in Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing.
Speaker 8: We have flight logs, we have information, names that will
Speaker 8: come out.
Speaker 3: Is it going to be shocking.
Speaker 8: I don't see how it's not shocking that there were
Speaker 8: so many individuals that were hidden and kept secret and
Speaker 8: not been held accountable. Let's talk about the reverse. I
Speaker 8: believe in accountabilities. You have to now go through your process.
Speaker 8: Now I won't say they're guilty until they go through
Speaker 8: their time in court. But again, now it's time for accountability.
Speaker 8: We have seen for so many years, Pierce in this country,
Speaker 8: many investigations, subpoena's testimonies in Congress, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 8: But there's a general frustration with accountability. We take it halfway,
Speaker 8: we don't take it home. And I really believe that
Speaker 8: now with cash and PAM, there will be accountability.
Speaker 3: Well, Elina, you were wrong, and since you are still
Speaker 3: serving as counselor to the President of the United States,
Speaker 3: I think that it is incumbent upon you to let
Speaker 3: him know that you were expecting justice and this will
Speaker 3: not stand. And if there isn't one person in the
Speaker 3: Trump administration that's willing to stand up and do the
Speaker 3: right thing to defend children, well then none of you
Speaker 3: deserve to be in power. And honestly, I would argue
Speaker 3: most of you deserve to be behind bars. And that
Speaker 3: goes all the way up to the President of the
Speaker 3: United States. And I mean that there are certain things
Speaker 3: that you just can't do. And if you cover up
Speaker 3: for the abuse of children, there is no hell hot
Speaker 3: enough And I'll leave it at that. If you enjoyed
Speaker 3: this episode and you want to get more cozy, well
Speaker 3: there's only one place to Gozie, that's my pillow dot com.
Speaker 3: MyPillow dot com from a code lockdown, Get yourself some
Speaker 3: Geeza sheets, get yourself some dope mustache like Mike Lindell.
Speaker 3: Good God, is that man attractive with this sweet ass
Speaker 3: American suit? Well even that American flagground You know who
Speaker 3: would tell us the truth about the Fstein case, Mike Lindell,
Speaker 3: I have no doubt, my Pullo dot com code lockdown.
Speaker 3: If you enjoyed this episode, hit the like button, subscribe,
Speaker 3: and most importantly share it around. Love you guys, Peace,