Speaker 1: Welcome back to the program. Dana Lash with you.
Speaker 2: We're at the bottom of this second hour. You can
listen coast to coast. You can also check out the
Simulcash channel through forty seven direct TV. Started the program
diving into all of the latest with Iran and the
president's strategy and then of course the narrative battle, because
it seems that there's some within the administration that are
trying to pull the president one way. And as we've discussed,
he's been entirely consistent on the issue of Iran since
doing the math can I think before we were alive.
I think that's how consistent that he has been on
the issue of Iran. And of course with the passing
of late Senator Lindsay Graham, and then you had benjaminett
Yahu who visited d C and was meeting with the
President yesterday, and then of course the United States returning
fire and responding to Iran's continued forty seven plus years
of aggression. So what's next? What is the strategy forward?
There are some in the United States that want the
president to finish the job. There are others that are
kind of dragging along, and it seems like that's where
we're getting mission creep to go with this, We're going
to speak with General Keith Kellogg.
Speaker 1: He is a retired Army lieutenant.
Speaker 2: Of course, he served with He served in the president's
first administration. It was a national security advisor. He joins
us now via video. General, pleasure to have you, and
I wanted to kind of get your, you know, kind
of thirty thousand foot view on this because potus was
when all of this began. He had really clear trajectory,
he had a really clear mission, and then somewhere along
the way, I think there were a lot of you know,
the old saying, a lot of cooks spoil the broth.
What can you tell us with where everything stands now?
And if you could guess where do you think that
the President's going to go?
Speaker 3: Well, thanks, Stan, it's going to be with you. Look
where I think we're at right now. It's almost like
a pause exert, almost like a stalemate right now, which
is really unfortunate. And I think that's because there's maybe
advisors around the president, and I would tell him, go
with your instincts. That will tell them all diplomacy early
accounts is going to help. You've got to really understand
the Iranians what they mean by diplomacy. You know, their
idea of to plomacy is not to solve the problem,
but to survive the problem. And you have to go
to a point where it make puts them at risk,
and that may need some pretty hard decisions for the
President to make. And I think the reason why there's
a lot of Americans that maybe don't support what's happening
has been drawn out. It's been taking his time to
get solved. And you want to get to a point
of solution with the problem with rent. Look what he
did at the start is right, making sure that they
don't get or have a chance to get to a
nuclear weapon. It's not for our generation, it's for the
grand killed kids generation and the children's generation well into
the future. And that's what he's trying to do right now,
because you do not want to have a nuclear weapon
another one, besides Israel having one in the Middle East.
It's totally destabilizing. The Saudi's have already said if the
Rainians are able to get a nuclear weapon, buy one
or make one, they're getting get one too, and the
Amoradis will get one. The ball Raineyings will give it
will everybody in the Middle East will have a nuclear
weapon and then it's totally destabilizing to the region. So
the president has the right instincts to what he's done.
I think carrying through is important. What does that mean?
That means you have to change your plan and go
something strategically. What you're going to do to affect the outcome.
I think bombing alone won't get you there. Tit for
tat won't get you there. They will survive that. Look
what the bridge did in World War Two when the
Germans threw the blitz thought they could bomb them into surrender.
They didn't. That it never works. When I was in
the First Gulf War, we had and an air campaign
of thirty days to bring the Iraqis to their feet.
I was sitting outside on the Borm ready to go
into a Raq and Kuwait. Once that was accomplished, they
didn't never do it. So we crossed the broom when
they would Iraq within forty eight hours, I was on
the Euphrates River and within one hundred hours the Iraqi
said enough of this. And you've got to think like that.
So what does that mean? How do you get to change?
You have to do something strategically to make them change
their idea if that means boots on the ground, and
I do not mean invading the Rain. I have never
said that that is too hard to push. But you
could take things, for an example, like taking carg Island,
which is ninety percent of their industrial output, and also
what helps with China because the vast majority of that
oil goes to China. Are you going take Iraq Island,
which is the command and control center in the Strait
of horm moves you have to do something dramatic about it,
But trading blows tip for tat. I think we're just
kind of wasting time and no weather the storm. They
do that because that's how they think. And right now,
if I would look at like their foreign minister or Rashi,
he wrote a book on the plovacy, they're following exactly
what he said to do, and I wouldn't fall into
that trap. And unfortunately, I think we're heading that way,
and I think the American people see that as way
that as well, and I think you want President Trump
to break that cycle. But go to the American people
and tell them why you're doing that. Like Richard Nixon
during the Vietnam War. He went to the American people
multiple times to tell him what he was doing and
what was happening that needs to be done. You've got
to bring him along. I think if he does that,
whatever his decision is, he brings American people with him,
we're gonna be just fine.
Speaker 2: We're talking with General Keith Kellogg for those just joining.
And one of the things I think that the President
General has working to his advantage is that throughout his
first term and even his second term, whenever there has
been any kind of conflict, he gets in and he
gets out. We look at Venezuela, we look at what's
happened elsewhere. He gets in and he gets out, and
he's maintained you know, that commitment of no long engagement
where you you know, any kind of mission creep anything
like that.
Speaker 1: He's kept his word.
Speaker 2: So I think in your estimation, do you agree that
that's probably bought him a lot of credibility with Americans,
especially if he's transparent in the manner you're suggesting.
Speaker 3: Well, every enemy is different data, and so you can't
just have one go like the next one as well.
These guys are different people. I mean the Iranian of
all these had a philosophy going back to the Persians
of what they were going to do, So you can't
treat it like when we went up to Solomoni or
went into Venezuela and got up Maduro. Remember when you
look at delci Rodriquez is still there. She was a
proponent of Maduro. Now she's changed her views quite a bit.
But I think the American people have it not because
it was short term, because it was decisive. And now
you're looking at will do you have the will to
pull this off? And every situation is a little bit different,
and I would say, if this is going to get extended,
then go to the American people and explain it to
them what you're doing. The American people are pretty damn
good in a fight, and they understand that. I think
that needs to be what needs to be done. He's
got credibility with the American people and he's got that
through his means of communication, and he should just extend
that and extend what he's going to do in Iran
and make it something that's good and viable. Look, when
you get into situations like this, it's not only the military,
it's the economic as well, the political as well, and
you have to bring all of them together to get
to a solution. Uranians know that they're going to try
to drag this out they get through the mid terms
if they can, and they're not going to be pliable
unless you make them pliable.
Speaker 2: And of course you also have Russia and China helping
Iran as well, which is also something that has to
factor into this, which then brings us back to the
Carg Island issue, which I think a lot of I
do think the administration needs to make that case if
that's an eventuality or if that's something on the table,
And going by all the reports from the discussions that
they had yesterday, it seems like that's something that's on
the table. What would that look like because it looks
like that for my estimation, that could be pretty quick
and divisive and decisive.
Speaker 1: That action.
Speaker 3: Well, Carg Island, we use that as an example. You know,
sixteen miles off shore, you can defend it pretty well.
You take a little bit of a fight again in there.
I would use something like the eighty second Airborne Division
with one of its brigades to go in and take
the island. Now you own something. The other side needs
an economic peace. And oh, by the way, it has
secondary effects because the vast majority of the oil, which
is ninety percent of the oil that comes out of
Iran goes to China. Now you bring China into play,
you say, if you really need are helping this, you
need to help us decide for these guys to stop fighting.
And I think that's what they need to think through.
Right now, we're going to for tat militarily that is,
and it's not going to work. I think you can
try and do that, it's it's gonna be a non starter. Look,
sooner or later you have to do sort of like
the Romans did. Sooner or later you have to put
soldiers in the mud that gets your decisive end to
a fight. Is it hard? Of course it is. There's
a risk, of course there is. But if you go
to the American people and explain it to them, I
would lay you money, you're going to get support. You're
not going to get all the support because there's always
people out there that will never support what President Trump does.
You know, they call that TDS, the Trump de Arrangement syndrome.
Just accept that and go to the people, say this,
this is what we're going to try to do.
Speaker 2: I wanted to ask you general about these stories that
I keep seeing where they talk about the shrinking weapons stockpile.
For for instance, Washington Post has this headline It's testing
the Pentagon's new strategy. It feels like this isn't something new.
This seems familiar, like we read about this during the
Biden administration. How true is this and if it is
even remotely true, is this something that can be replenished
relatively quickly? Because I know that we have a lot
of those firms here in the United States with American
jobs that make this stuff.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we do, But Dana, I will tell you they're
partially right on this. When you make a Patriot missile,
you don't make them like an assemblat on them with
a car. It takes two years two years to make it,
and then you distributed what it takes to make it.
For example, Raytheon may build one part, Lockey Martin build another.
The pack three secret warheads are built by Boeing and
only so many a month. So I think we need
to take that out of consideration and figure out how
do we beat that. Now, when it comes to the
amount of systems, there's a thing in the military called
cross leveling, So you take from one theater of operations
the Far East and you move to a second theater
of operations being sentcom and then you do that to
make sure you have the weapons available, and then you
need to understand the u from the high end weapons
patriot to lower middle level weapons because you have more
of those. So right now, by usage alone, of course
we're using a lot. And if you don't make them
right away, it's sort of like the example we use
is the liberty ships in World War Two. We started
cranking those out really really quick. They were not great ships,
but allowed us to move cargo overseas into the European theater.
So it was a short term solution to a long
range problem. And we need to do that with her
defense industrial based. We need to talk to the Raytheons
of the Boeings and everybody else involved. We do not tolerate,
we will not tolerate something about you taking two years to
develop and make a system. We're throwing money at it
right now. They need to get that in their head
and how it's going to be done. Or you go
to other suppliers and you billet your supply chain, which
is a little bit of the problem right now. We
do not have a robust supply chain because we never
thought we'd be in a situation like we are right now.
Well we are, and now we have to figure out
how to get out of it, how.
Speaker 1: To get out of it.
Speaker 2: Indeed, last question for a general, and I appreciate your time.
You've been you've advised the Trump administration. You've been there
through some of these some of the decisions that we've
talked about. You've been right there with the president helping
to determine the outcomes of this. What is your take
on the stories about the division within the president's own administration,
you know, his own kitchen cabinet. Is this something that
Americans should be worried about? Do you think that this
is maybe kind of perhaps, you know, pulling on the
president from achieving the objective that he was elected to achieve.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think I believe there's probably tension, which is normal.
But I think the tension is the other way, in
the sense that he has the instincts go one direction
when the instincts are really good, and they're kind of
pulling back a little bit because a lot of his advisors.
I believe don't have the capacity to accept risk and
anything that's going on right now, so they look at
the easy way out. You know, I'll give you a
good example. In the first term when and I was
there and I watched it happen, when we decided to
move the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He
made that call that had been delayed over thirty seven
times because the president had the authority to delay that
transfer every six months. Well, he did it the first time,
but the second time he didn't. He moved the embassy. Well,
there were people in the room, to include the Secretary
of State at the time, that it would cause a
third ind to fauduct. Well it didn't. He went with
his instincts. And why was it done thirty seven times
before a delay? Because people get scared. You get in
a bureaucratic environment and people can't absorb or attend to
that risk. And that's probably what we're seeing right now.
People say, boy, if you put boots on the ground,
that's going to be a terrible thing for the American people.
Go to them, tell them what you're doing. And I
think when that happens, you're going to solve the problem.
Speaker 2: You go General Keith Kellogg. Always appreciate your insight. Thank
you not only for your service to our country, but
also continuing to serve the country by breaking it down
so everybody can understand it.
Speaker 1: We appreciate you. God blessed, Thank you.
Speaker 3: Thanks.
Speaker 2: We have more to come, folks, as we wrap up
the second hour heading into our third, and we're capitalists.
We can't do it without the people who make the
program possible, and one of those entities is our friends
over at Relief Factor. There is a lot out there
in the supplement industry. They're packed with all kinds of
stuff and you guys seen it. You know you've seen it.
They make big promises, but relief Factor is different because
there's stuff actually works. I have seen it in my
own household with my husband. He's got sports injuries like
hockey and football. He had his first knee surgery when
he was eighteen years old, so yeah, he uses relief Factor.
I have a friend who's a professional bodybuilder. She also
uses relief Factor because she live heavy, she competes, she travels,
and it's really been beneficial to her. Every Day aches
and inflammation really chips away at your freedom. That's what
drives it and Relief Factors one hundred percent drug free.
It's a research based formula. It's designed to fight inflammation
that's the root cause of most pain. It's not a
temporary fix either. It works from the inside out to
support your body's natural healing response, so you can feel
a difference in days or weeks. It depends obviously on
your body and your I think pattern of taking it.
But Relief Factor helps you get back to walking comfortably
and stain active and just living life without constant discomfort.
You could be the next person that has a Relief
Factor success story gets started today. The three week quick
start is just seventeen seventy six. Visit Reliefactor dot com
or call eight hundred and number four Relief talk with
one of their friendly US based team members and find
out if Relief Factor can help you get back to
doing what you love.
Speaker 4: And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's quickfi.
Speaker 2: London's population sees its first real fall for thirty seven
years as about half a million have moved to other
parts of the UK. It's the first decline since the eighties,
I mean outside of the coronavirus pandemic. Their population has
shrunk by I mean really like over four hundred and
twenty thousand.
Speaker 1: Who would want to live there?
Speaker 2: I mean it's expensive, it's getting taken over, there's no
one order. I mean, hell, you can't even go and
have a proper steak knife. It's ridiculous. So I mean,
who would be you know, be surprised that that that's how,
that's where New York is going to go. Gene Gibson,
who is known as one of the Rosie the Riveters,
passed away at the age of one hundred. She and
her fellow Rosies they were awarded the Congressional Gold Medal,
one of the nation's highest civilian honors, during their work
and determination to help secure victory in World War Two.
Speaker 1: So very interesting story.
Speaker 2: My great grandmother was one who worked in the facts
in Saint Louis doing the same thing, so it's a
very interesting legacy. Let's see Divided fedholds rates interest rates study.
Three members voted to hike Why why I hate everything?
Speaker 1: I hate everything?
Speaker 2: Why vote to hide the just I'm not even I'm
not even gonna talk about this. I'm just gonna sit
here and get mad, and I'm going to get all
of you mad. So okay, I'm really confused about this.
Harrisburg police have cracked down on what they say are
illegal speak easies. What is an illegal speakeasy? I mean
speak that's a kind of a it's a redundant term.
Speakeasy is, you know, signals that it is illegal, but
also liquors legal.
Speaker 1: How is it?
Speaker 2: They said, Oh, they're unpermitted bars. I like the idea
of an unpermitted bar. Frankly, I don't care. I mean,
I if I had a basement, I'd operate one out
of it, just because so they said. Apparently it's a
big it's a big issue. They're cracking down on unpermitted bars.
What makes a bar unpitted? I mean, what if someone's
giving you a donation for the hooch and you're just like,
everybody goes in and someone provides the hooch, everybody pitches in.
I mean that sounds American, you know what I dare
I say that sounds like good old fashioned neighborhood teamwork.
Speaker 1: That does not sound like an illegal.
Speaker 2: Bar or an on PREMI que my earling holland mocking face,
a mysterious object in NASA, and a NASA marsh photo
ignites theories of extraterrestrial life. Please Dear God, let aliens
come and declare war on our planet, because I want
something good to do. Uh. It's a UFO researcher who
says they think it's an alien missile. It's basically a
blur in the in the ground and nobody knows what
it is.
Speaker 1: We have a lot more on the way. Stick with
us as we move.
Speaker 2: We also have days of these United States, our partners
that bring you the program. It's our friends over at
ghost bed. Okay, every place that we stayed when we
were traveling was nice.
Speaker 1: It was not my ghost bed mattress.
Speaker 2: So I'm a brat and this company needs to stat
make a portable mattress for me because I'm already done.
I'm like, I need my ghostbed mattress. If you are
not sleeping on a ghost bed, you might as well
be sleeping on a hobo peacot.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm just saying it. Don't google that,
don't google it.
Speaker 2: It is the best made mattress out there. I say
this to somebody who spent a sinful amount on a
bougie brand and that was trash ghost Bed is just
the absolute best. First off, they have cooling tech built
into every mattress. I don't know if you knew this
or not. Cooling tech in every single mattress. Where everybody
else charges you extra for it, they don't at ghost
Bed because it's just part of it's just what that
part of their whole mattress. The constructions better, the materials
are better, the support You will notice the difference legit
right away.
Speaker 1: You're not tossing and turning. I lay down on this
thing and I am out till morning.
Speaker 2: I used to have to take twenty milligrams in malatonin
a night to go to sleep.
Speaker 1: Now I'm down to ten.
Speaker 2: I'm not even kidding you, and I think it's because
my mattress is just so supportive.
Speaker 1: I'm not tossing and turning all night.
Speaker 2: Ghostbed helps with all the issues that you're dealing with
because it's not you, it's your mattress, and you get
one hundred and one nights to try it in your home.
This is a piece of health equipment, right You're supposed
to rest and restore. If you're not doing that, it
is having a negative impact on your health. So do
something good for yourself and get a ghost bed like
I said, one hundred and one nights to try it
in your home. If you do not feel the difference,
you can send it back risk free. So right now
they're offering all of you out there ten percent off.
Visit ghostbed dot com slash data use promo code data
that's ghostbed dot com slash Dana promo code Dana for
an extra ten percent off. Welcome back a little Morrisy
to just bring us back in Dana Lash here with you.
I'm very much in that mood man. Just bring on
the darkwave. We are at the bottom of this first hour.
You can go find us over on the sub stack
as well. We're going to come back on this Iran
stuff because I, like I said, I saw this article.
They're really really trying so hard to pressure Trump and
they're trying to make it look like his I don't know.
I think somebody in his administration is leaking and acting
like oh we're so they're actively leaking on him at
this point, and it's different from them leaking on him
the first administration, because that I just think was a
bunch of fame horrors who were just trying to get
their names in the press, whereas I think the people
who are leaking on Potus now they're trying to get
their name in the press for a different reason. I
think that they're trying to maneuver to take over as
his influence. Wane's going into twenty twenty eight, because in
order for a new Republican ascendancy, you have to get
rid of the old guard, right, And that's what some
of this is. So much of this is posturing for
twenty eight. But I have to say, like I tweeted earlier,
the establishment types that railed against Potus, who said some
pretty heinous things about him and warmed their way back
into the cap into his administration. Anyway, they need to
stop kissing mulla ass with these Obama policies. And that's
exactly what it is. We've talked about it, I've written
about it. You know, if there's any educational welfare queint
out there whose Google has broken, tough luck for you.
But I mean we've discussed it quite at length. They're
pretty much indistinguishable from what the Obama policies are. And
this is how stuff gets dragged out. Stop undermining Potus
and let the man who's actually elected to do the job.
Speaker 1: Do the damn job. That's it.
Speaker 2: We didn't vote for people trying to get a popularity
contest with a bunch of goat fornicators that are calling
the shots with the IRGC. We elected Trump. Big difference.
So I'm going to come back to this. Speaking of elections,
I need to touch on this narrative that's emerging out
of Texas. If you are a subscriber over to substack,
you also have this. So the headline is Republicans shouldn't
be dumb about Ken Paxton. I'm going to say things
that might be unpopular for those people who are weak
and pathetic with super sensitive you know constitutions, the drive
by trolls that are funded by China's algorithm. They may
want to take a step back from this one. So
the New York Times had this handwringing piece about Ken
Paxton and GOP donors, right, and they're calling it, you know,
this peculiar dynamic in Texas where you have two of
the bigger money groups, the Senate Leadership Fund and you know,
the BAGA group that are hoping that one and not
the other, is the one that opens the wallet and
helps out with Paxton, because Talla Rico's raising money. But
Democrats have a major problem with fundraising right now. And
if you're wondering why Democrats have a major problem with
fundraising right.
Speaker 1: Now, just go and look at the terrorists.
Speaker 2: Who is the mayor of New York City, Go and
look at some of the other terrorists that are running
for office in places like Little Mogadishu up in Minnesota
and some of these other areas, and the rhetoric that
they're pushing voters don't really like it, including voters on
the Democrat side who just want COMMI light policies without
actually concentration camps. So this issue of money with Democrats
is a big deal. But the media is not focusing
on that as much because they want to make it
look like Ken Paxton, who is running for Senate in
John Cornyn's seat now because he ousted the incumbent. They
want to make it look like he's in dire straits
and they're talking about, oh, well, you know, the problem is,
you know, it's a unique situation. They're they're holding their cards,
et cetera. I wrote that if there is an issue
in the Senate race, it is going to be of
the Republican's own making. And the Republicans are really really
good at deucing the bed. Oh my gosh, if it
was if deucing the bed was an Olympic sport, Republicans
would be the only gold medal winners since its inception,
because nobody's better than taking a dump in the bed
except for Amber heard then the Republican Party, they're so
good at it. So Cornyn, he was challenged because he
wasn't delivering and voters wanted him gone. Paxton was the
only candidate that was like actually ready and prepared to
step into the ring. And Paxton can win in the general.
But Paxton won't win in the general if Republicans choose
to give it over to that demonic ned Flanders aka
James tall Rico. So, yes, Paxton's going through a divorce. Yes,
Paxton has a girlfriend. Okay, Yes, he was exonerated of
impeachment of the accusations during his impeachment trial. He was exonerated,
So that doesn't hold any water. Is here's the question
for all of those people out there that are hemming
and hying and acting like this is some kind of
existential crisis. Is Paxton's issue with his failed marriage enough
of a reason to yet your vote into the ether.
So we get that plastic lawn flamingo James Tallerico.
Speaker 1: Is it?
Speaker 2: That's the question. Is that issue with him enough to
yet your vote into hell? It's a serious question. I'm
being incredibly serious. Mine the you know, flora and fauna
of my language. I'm being very serious, is it? I mean,
why should voters be punished if you don't like his
personal life?
Speaker 1: That's not my problem.
Speaker 2: Why should we have to suffer the Democrats' little lord
aunt Leroy freak because of it?
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't care.
Speaker 2: Let me be very very clear, I do not care
if Ken Paxton club's baby seals behind a BUCkies.
Speaker 1: I don't care. I don't care if he does.
Speaker 2: I choose a candidate that votes my issues over the
guy that pushes gun control backs is lombists and wants
men and women's bathrooms. Clubbing baby seals behind a BUCkies
isn't anywhere near as bad as what Tallerico wants to
do and already has supported. Your vote is not an
endorsement of their personal life. That's a psyop being perpetrated
upon your Your vote isn't an endorsement for or a
declaration of who you think the next pope should be.
It is a vote for a vessel to carry out
your agenda.
Speaker 1: That's all it is.
Speaker 2: And this is to carry your agenda through the Senate period.
It's a great syop to shame voters into either staying
home or throwing their vote away by misrepresenting what a
vote actually.
Speaker 1: Is and what it means.
Speaker 2: And then you have these holier than now establishment types
who lost races and they still expect you to kiss
the ring and they want to be wined and dine
with a nice Italian cab over a steak dinner. That's
not going to happen because you got to skivty win
elections to call the shots kidlets, that that's what has
to happen. It's true, yeah, you do. You got to
skivity win that stuff. I'm going to make that word
unattractive forever, and it's my goal.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: In this piece, The New York Times actually resolves its
own issue because they say, now, listen to this. They
bear the way down at the end, they go well,
to some extent, national democrats are experience and experiencing the
same paralysis as Republicans, and it gets into tall Rico
can raise a little bit more money himself than some
of these other dandies out there, but by and large,
they're all still on the same struggle bus. And they
get into they're like, yes, you know, all of these
other bigger Republican groups are going to fund Paxston, etc.
So the GOP, they're going to open their wallets because
they don't want to fudge up a Senate race by
being bitter tight wads, especially since we're all watching them, right,
and nobody wants to donate their money on the Democrat
side to some sis whatever Islamic simping terror light palm
squad that's going to turn their cities into feces and
needles capitals of the world, all of California. So I'm
not really super hyper worried about the Paxton race, but
I am completely prepared to go after the Republican establishment
types who are still nursing butt hurt over getting beaten.
I see them with their little stuff on Facebook and
all this stuff.
Speaker 1: That's not the winner.
Speaker 2: It's not anybody else's responsibility to bring anybody else to
the table. Right, we're all big kids here. You got
to win elections if you want to call the shots.
So I'm not exactly worried. I just don't want to
see Republicans be stupid about this stuff. You're being sy
opped into thinking that you're voting for some kind of messiah,
and that's exactly not at all what's happening. You're voting
for a vessel in which you put your agenda and
then you scooch them down the downfield.
Speaker 1: That's how it is. That's all it is.
Speaker 2: Don't be syoped into thinking something different so that you
throw your vote away, because then you're just being a
tool for the left. That's the truth of it. So
a couple of other things to hit as well. In addition, Oh,
by the way, the male outreach for Democrats. I don't
think they've gotten any better since Harris and what's his face?
Speaker 1: Walls?
Speaker 2: Remember when they had all the people that they were
do what they I guess what the left considered manly things.
And they had this obviously gay dude, no offense to
gay dudes, but he was not like he was one
of the gay dudes that could not be You know,
he doesn't chop wood, right, you know that guy doesn't
wear flannel and chop wood he's one of them. I mean,
I I am made of more jokes, Kane. I mean,
we can't go further, but it's like they get these
people out here, these these caricatures of what they think
masculinity is. Remember they had the one guy who's like
I Corborators for breakfast, and I just felt like that
Happy Gilmore scene, like.
Speaker 1: Eue Corburetors for breakfast, what's the matter with you?
Speaker 2: And they were trying so hard to be dudes and like,
you know, what's up fellow dudes like that? And it
just was horrible. So the Democrats have not gotten any better.
Uh So, for instance, like Tall Riica was sharing the
fact that he had a he reposted this thing where
he had a real life action fa You're I guess
of a masked Fauci. How much testosterone did you have
to trade to get that? I'm curious?
Speaker 1: Yeah, all of it.
Speaker 2: The Democratic Party approval rating amongst men, according to a
Quinnipiac poll taken July twenty third through the twenty seventh,
seventy one percent disapproved, twenty percent approved. Now I haven't
broken out the crosstabs with that, but honestly, that tracks
from everything that I've seen they don't have anybody. They
think masculinity is toxic, so they don't have anyone that
they can actually use. All and the normal Democrats that
they kind of have, they excortiate, like John Futterman, they
can't stand him. They Josh Shapiro is still pretty lefty,
but he's Jewish.
Speaker 1: And they can't stand that.
Speaker 2: So he's you know, and then Andy Basheer, they're terrified
of him. He's still a lefty, but he's not nuts.
He's still nuts, but not nuts nuts.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: And they don't want to have they don't want to
put him out there either. So what are they going
to do. I don't know what they're going to do.
But they're having trouble with the dudes. I would just
think you're having trouble with the women. Well, like, how
do you look at somebody like James Tallerico and think, hmmm.
Speaker 1: I'm going to vote for that right?
Speaker 2: Like it's like natural birth control. You look at it
and you're like, I'm good, you know what I mean?
Why that's I don't know. I think that there's some
psychology there. Nobody don't. As a woman, I wouldn't want
to vote for a man that I think I could
beat an arm wrestling. I just don't want that. I
don't want to vote for a man that I think
I could actually overpower. If I feel like I can
overpower you, I just can't, right, you know what I mean?
I think that's you know, I just and that somehow
translates over into my thoughts on your inability to lead
an elected office or do anything in elected office. I
feel like that's a fair assessment. I don't feel like
that I am the only woman that looks at it
that way.
Speaker 1: Either.
Speaker 2: We have more to get to as we move and
conclude this third hour, our partners that make the program possible.
Speaker 1: It is really fat. I don't know. Sorry.
Speaker 2: Patriot Mobile are good. Oh my gosh, Patriot Mobile. I
had my can I just say I had Patriot Mobile
on the other side of the world and I never
had an issue with my service. So I was literally
posting stuff from like the Sea of Galilee, and I
didn't have a single issue with my service. If you
have not switched to Patriot Mobile, I don't know why
you hate yourself. It is the only Christian conservative cell
phone service that is out there. They're going to save
you money. You get premium priority nationwide service on all
three major networks. You get dual network capability, multiple Wi
Fi hotspots, great US based customer support. Guys, I had
a clear as day signal over there. I had no
issues with any of my service at all. And by
the way, if you got a question and you call them,
every single call is entered by real people right here
in America. This is a Texas born and bred company,
so they provided such great service. I've traveled all over
the world with Patriot Mobile and I've never had an issue.
Superior coverage, superior products, superior customer service. Visit Patriotmobile dot
com slash Dana, the only like minded cell phone company
out there. You can also call nine seven two Patriot
and use promo Coddina to get a free month of service.
It's Patriotmobile dot Com slash Dana at nine seven two
Patriot promo Codana for a free month of service.
Speaker 1: It's his life mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida Man.
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, Florida man dressed a superman ended up
robbing this business of power tools actually was a boat,
so that he was dressed as Superman. He stole a
bunch of power tools off a boat. According to police,
fifty seven year old James Tidwell admitted to the theft.
It was a off a boat in Ruskin. He was
charged with burglar of an unoccupied conveyance and petty theft.
It was a boat anchored behind a house and Ruskin.
When they've got the camera footage, he was dressed up
as Superman. He's like, yeah, I went on the boat,
but I only took three things. Like the police were
going to go, oh only three? Oh, okay, our bad,
Like you're free to go?
Speaker 1: No big no, big whoop.
Speaker 2: It's okay. No, that's not how it works. So yeah,
he immediately was taken into prison. That's the the Why would.
Speaker 4: You he only took you know what, That's all I
could carry.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I was like if he'd.
Speaker 2: Probably take more if he could. I'm pretty sure. I'm
pretty sure he would have.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean he's Superman. He can carry a lot of stuff, right,
you know. Let's see, Oh can I got to do
this one? This is Florida woman Amber who sent us
A Florida man was arrested after he purchased a kilo
of cocaine in the mail.
Speaker 1: Mail order cocaine. No, you can't. Actually, that's what he discovered.
Lee County Man.
Speaker 2: He's facing some felony charges after detectives intercepted a package
that was containing more than one keylo of cocaine that
was sent through the US post Service, and the postal
workers were the ones who alerted law enforcement about a
suspicious package that was believed to have contained the illegal
narcotics and it was being delivered to a resident in
Lee Acres, and so his name is Sergio de Villa.
And they arrived at his residence and they watched him
get the package and then he left the house and
they conducted a traffic stopped shortly thereafter. They he did
try to throw the package out of the vehicle's window
in front of them on camera because the dashboard camera.
And then he was like, I don't know, I saw
that box in the road too.
Speaker 1: They're like, you put it there.
Speaker 2: We watched you literally shove it out of the driver's
side window onto the road, and you put it there,
so they haven't. That's we don't have any other details,
but he was charged with cocaine trafficking, tampering with evidence.
I'm sure that there's probably another one because isn't there's
always another charge. If you used to postal service, there's
like another it's like another felony or something. So yeah,
I'm sure sure he's going to have that. And let's
see that's like I got a couple of others here.
Oh well, there's a floor to me that one eight
hundred million dollar mega million's jackpot. You know how much
that the government's going to take that in tax?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, he gets to claim eight hundred million asterisk eight
hundred million jackpot. It's not going to be eight hundred millions,
so much of that is. In fact, I think he's
only going to end up. I mean, I think they're
going to take like several hundred million from him.
Speaker 1: So like SAMs through the hol glass, so are the
days of the United States ready?
Speaker 4: No, his approval rate is thirty. His diapers always dirty.
I think the guy's insane. He ain't no stable genius,
got a y, but.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have a brain. I hate her color the
reflecting point. Why do these people do this?
Speaker 3: It can't help it?
Speaker 1: Like who sits there? And I was like, you know
what I'm a guy want to do?
Speaker 2: I don't know what I called myself singing a song
and the camera look up maybeing clever, it's not. It
just it's can you dive cringe? Because I did, we
all did. We're in hell now. I was just joking.
I'm like, I think I believe in youth in Asia
for her, and then Steve was like, that's my punk
band name, and I'm like, youth in Asia is so great.
Dana violent speech, choked to death. No, it's not. I
how was she ever funny? No, she wasn't. The only
reason she was ever famous is because for a very
short period of time, she was Madonna's bff.
Speaker 1: That was it.
Speaker 2: That literally was all she ever. She was a clinger
on and Madonna's wake. I'm not like, you know, celebrating
and acting like Madonna's some saint or anything. But I'm
just saying she was a global superstar. It's the only
reason Rosy O'donnald's known. It's like how Taylor Swift has
like little friends that she immediately unfriends a couple of
years later. Same thing, it's the same thing. It's the
same thing as that between her and Who's the other
Who's that other broad that was in the Witch movie
Hocus Pocus, Bete Middler, bet Middller Middler. I think they're
the same person, right, and enjoy behar They're all like
the same I was gonna say, like like a rag
from a hobo's peacock, but sure that also works.
Speaker 4: I'm not as artful with my words.
Speaker 2: I'm just telling you I've got so. I have a
couple of stories. One is so politically incorrect. I actually
don't know if I can share it on air. And
I'm on this struggle bus so badly because I am
so incredibly transparent with everything. I don't know if you
know what it's about. Hang on, let me's okay, that's
what it was about. See, I don't know if I
can say that, right. No, I wouldn't say I wouldn't
say that, but you know, right, I'm just saying so,
I just feel like this goes with her. If you
don't like him so much, then move do something. Go
to Canada and get you know what. You can go
to Canada and get one of those cozy little pods.
Take a nap, right that long long nap. It looks
like one of the pods from Wally. Just hop in
there and let that door close and Dana, you're being
so mean. I'm not really though, No I disagree.
Speaker 4: And now all of the news you would probably miss.
Speaker 1: It's time for Dana's Quick five. Well.
Speaker 2: A circus performer was accidentally shot in the neck with
an arrow at a county fair. Anna Tavera was performed
I mean a crossbow sharpshooting neck when she accidentally shot
her partner, Edward Wrangle in the neck with an arrow.
Speaker 1: This was in Middletown, New York. It was an accident.
Speaker 2: It happened Friday night at the Orange County Fair in Middletown,
northwest of New York City thirty eight. Both of them, respectively,
Tavera and then Wrangle. They were both of Wisconsin. They
were performing their crossbow sharpshooting neck and she hit him
in the neck with an arrow as he held up
a foam target, who was air lifted to a hospital
and stable condition. They canceled the whole circus for the night. Oh.
The ring master said that the dude was luckily struck
on the side of his neck where there's mostly soft
tissue and no major blood vessels.
Speaker 1: So yeah, yeah, yeah, he's okay.
Speaker 2: I mean, don't die, you know. Candy lands mommy sleuth.
They're going to get up there and have big time
fun with this. But they said that he's going to
continue for performing after you know, he heals up and
you know, can do normal things again. So, you know,
a school trip got sawt of hand. They had they
had to apologize to the entire country of Thailand.
Speaker 3: What.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the students were talking so loud on the skytrain.
A local woman asked them to quiet down, and then
a group of Italian students and then they she told
them they needed manners, and apparently then the local woman
snapped and the students said, sorry for bringing money to
your country.
Speaker 1: And then it went.
Speaker 2: From there and one of them told her your mom,
and it just got I mean, why are you arguing
with the group of teenagers on the They're literally tourists, okay,
like unclincher butt for five seconds.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Do I think the country needed they need to apologize
to the country. No, I don't think they did. She
just seems she seemed like a Karen. If I'm being real,
somebody in Missouri's missing a kangaroo. They're using drones.
Speaker 1: To search for it. This is such a Missouri.
Speaker 2: Missouri is like the midwest Florida. So they said that
they're there's a kangaroo in the loose in southeast Missouri
and they're like, if you see him, don't like contact
the owners immediately. It's in the Nestley Mine area near
the railroad tracks. That's the last place they was seeing.
His name is Rufus. He went missing in Bloomfield and
the family's been searching NonStop for their kangaroo, so hopefully
they'll find him. Coming up the lad is with Iran
and Potus's strategy stick with us