Speaker 1: You know, a world of deceit. Telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the eighteenth of February,
Speaker 2: Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well, government everywhere
Speaker 2: is quickly canceling privacy as they take us into the
Speaker 2: surveillance state. We can see it at the EU. We
Speaker 2: can see it, of course in the federal government, but
Speaker 2: it is state governments now that have come up with
Speaker 2: some of the worst, most absurd regulations to protect children,
Speaker 2: supposedly folks. We can at least fight it there if
Speaker 2: we know what it is. We're going to talk about
Speaker 2: that today. A new report shows just how huge the
Speaker 2: welfare magnet is for immigrants and how effective the pivot
Speaker 2: strategy has been. And then we're going to take a
Speaker 2: look at what the Pentagons fight with Anthropic, the company
Speaker 2: behind Claude Ai. What that fight from the Pentagon, what
Speaker 2: they really want shows us the frightening plans the Pentagon
Speaker 2: has for war with America. It's not just palanteer. Volunteer
Speaker 2: is central to it, but this is the federal government
Speaker 2: at war with you. And we're going to take a
Speaker 2: look at the quote unquote list of the Department of
Speaker 2: Justice put out with names. It's got everybody from Elvis
Speaker 2: to Alex Jones named in the Epstein file. What is
Speaker 2: behind that trick? We'll be right back. Well, an Arizona
Speaker 2: bill would require ID checks in order to even use
Speaker 2: a weather app. Yeah, that's right, even apps that are
Speaker 2: come pre installed on your phone. The bill would require
Speaker 2: parental permission or identity checks to open the calculator app
Speaker 2: that came with your photos your phone rather your photos
Speaker 2: as well. This is all being done in the name
Speaker 2: of protecting children. And they would classify everybody into four
Speaker 2: different age groups, adults and then three minor age groups.
Speaker 2: And even if a minor update to the terms of
Speaker 2: services or something like that is included, you'd have to
Speaker 2: go through the whole authorization process. Yet again, let me
Speaker 2: tell you, this is not about protecting kids, as we've
Speaker 2: seen over and over again, this is about having an
Speaker 2: excuse of pretense to make sure that nobody can use
Speaker 2: the Internet that an ID and it is another pretext
Speaker 2: for the surveillance state. The surveillance state has to cancel privacy.
Speaker 2: I mean, just look at what they do with their masks.
Speaker 2: The ice agents with their masks. It's absurd. What if
Speaker 2: they got to hide well everything, I guess. Apparently, it
Speaker 2: would create a surveillance architecture that applies to every mobile
Speaker 2: device using every mobile device user in the state of Arizona.
Speaker 2: App store providers would be required to verify every single
Speaker 2: account holder's age category and share that data with developers.
Speaker 2: We got to know this is coming out of Arizona,
Speaker 2: but there's a lot of states that have done this.
Speaker 2: Texas has. Texas is on the first ones now so
Speaker 2: far that has been blocked in courts, and it should
Speaker 2: be blocked. Divide users into four age categories, children under thirteen,
Speaker 2: those between thirteen and sixteen, those between sixteen and eighteen,
Speaker 2: and then adults. Everybody would be put in one of
Speaker 2: these four buckets, and the Arizona Attorney General would be
Speaker 2: tasked with creating rules to establish acceptable verification procedures. So
Speaker 2: once you establish this, once you start creating a mechanism
Speaker 2: for tracking and a permission system for using the Internet,
Speaker 2: it'll apply to politics, it'll apply to religion. There's no
Speaker 2: end of it. So they say, for anyone under eighteen,
Speaker 2: the bill mandates that their account be affiliated with a
Speaker 2: parental account. We've got to make sure the parents know
Speaker 2: what's going on. Well, if you're under eighteen, most likely
Speaker 2: the parents are paying for the phone and paying a
Speaker 2: monthly bill. Kids don't have a job to do that,
Speaker 2: so of course they already know about that. The law
Speaker 2: doesn't specify how the parent child account affiliation would actually
Speaker 2: be verified. You know, maybe they could ask the company
Speaker 2: that they pay the bill to. It's absurd what it's
Speaker 2: happening with this, but developers be required to notify app
Speaker 2: stores of any significant change. App stores that then be
Speaker 2: required to notify parent accounts and obtain renewed consent. The
Speaker 2: burden will fall on both of those parties, with civil
Speaker 2: penalties of up to seventy five thousand dollars per violation,
Speaker 2: and of course it would allow parents and children to
Speaker 2: sue them. Arizona joins a growing list of states pursuing
Speaker 2: app store age verification Texas, Utah, and Louisiana California. Of
Speaker 2: all past versions of these laws. The Texas law faces
Speaker 2: an appeal after having been stopped in court. Utah and
Speaker 2: Louisiana our scheduled take effect later this year. In California's
Speaker 2: version arrives in twenty twenty seven. So we've seen this
Speaker 2: happening over and over again in the EU. They have
Speaker 2: to know everything that we are doing, and yet we
Speaker 2: expect this from the federal government. We expect it from
Speaker 2: the EU. But this is something that is happening at
Speaker 2: the state level, and really at the state level we
Speaker 2: have the ability to do something about this. That's where
Speaker 2: you need to get involved. So the hang on just
Speaker 2: one second, having an issue here with us trying to
Speaker 2: get to my next article, but I had another one
Speaker 2: that I wanted to talk about here. But here we go.
Speaker 2: It seems to have revived. This is well evidently not.
Speaker 2: I'm going to try to take care of this thing,
Speaker 2: and we're going to take a quick break, folks, I
Speaker 2: mean really quick break, and we will be right back.
Speaker 2: Stay with us.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to
Speaker 3: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, we're back. And again these can't live with
Speaker 2: these with O these things and I can't live with them.
Speaker 2: And sometimes as well, this is the thing that we
Speaker 2: had the issue with last week. I actually like this,
Speaker 2: but it does have its issues from time time. This
Speaker 2: is the quote that I was looking for. I couldn't
Speaker 2: pull up. A federal judge blocked the Texas law before
Speaker 2: it could take effect. US District Judge Robert Pittman said
Speaker 2: the law is akin to a law that would require
Speaker 2: every bookstore to verify the age of every customer at
Speaker 2: the door, and for miners to require parental consent before
Speaker 2: the child or teen could enter, and require printal consent
Speaker 2: again before they could buy a book. This is the
Speaker 2: absurdity of it. But it's even worse than this, and
Speaker 2: this article does not mention it. I looked up. I thought, well,
Speaker 2: is aris On a state that requires rental consent before
Speaker 2: they change a child's gender or before they start gaslighting
Speaker 2: them over pronouns in school. No, As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: there's less control over what happens to your child and
Speaker 2: an Arizona public school, then there is what happens on
Speaker 2: your cell phone in Arizona. Even with this law. Of course,
Speaker 2: in Arizona, they have no parental consent required for changing pronouns.
Speaker 2: They have a law that says, well, we really suggest
Speaker 2: that you tell the parents, but it's not a requirement
Speaker 2: that they tell the parents if they're gaslighting a child
Speaker 2: and the child now thinks they're different sex, so there's
Speaker 2: no requirement at all for that. But look at all
Speaker 2: these stringent requirements. Let me just tell you, we all
Speaker 2: know this is not about protecting kids. There's many ways
Speaker 2: that you can protect kids, and of course parents are
Speaker 2: the key to doing that. But if they were concerned
Speaker 2: about protecting kids from perversion or sexual content or whatever,
Speaker 2: you can imagine they would do something about this gender
Speaker 2: mutilation and gas lighting that's going on in their own institutions.
Speaker 2: They're not, they're not. But again, Texas law is on hold, Utah, Louisiana,
Speaker 2: and California. Utah and Louisiana coming up this year, California
Speaker 2: coming up next year. Meanwhile, you have in the EU
Speaker 2: you have Macron, Fred Mertz and Ursula, who's fond of lying.
Speaker 2: They want expanded speech controls, of course they do. We
Speaker 2: have to be sure that there is one single person
Speaker 2: with one account, said Macron. And if this is an
Speaker 2: AI system, if this is a BOT, or if it's
Speaker 2: organized by a big organization, that should be forbidden. Well fine,
Speaker 2: then regulate the artificial intelligence, regulate the corporations, don't regulate
Speaker 2: the people. If you're concerned about AI masquerading at something else,
Speaker 2: because you know how dangerous that is because you do
Speaker 2: it all the time. You governments do it, so you
Speaker 2: know how dangerous that is. Well, you could very easily
Speaker 2: require ID from the artificial intelligence, for example, So you're
Speaker 2: going to identify yourself preemptively, or we'll do something about
Speaker 2: it once we find out that you're not doing it. Instead,
Speaker 2: they come after humans. Then they use that as an excuse.
Speaker 2: It's a system where every social media user would have
Speaker 2: their identity verified by platforms and tied to a single
Speaker 2: permitted account. Anonymous speech, pseudononymous commentary, the ability to maintain
Speaker 2: separate personal and professional presences online would all effectively end.
Speaker 2: And of course they're coming after VPNs as well, virtual
Speaker 2: privacy networks. The governments want a powerful tool to identify,
Speaker 2: track and silence anybody whose speech they object to. We
Speaker 2: see so many aspects of this. The West has descended
Speaker 2: folks into tyranny. It is pervasive and leadership of every
Speaker 2: party in every country. If you didn't see it in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, you can still see it in this. None
Speaker 2: of them respect our individual liberties, none of them, not
Speaker 2: the US certainly, and not the EU of course, obviously,
Speaker 2: they all aspire to tyranny, and they're open about it
Speaker 2: as well, and so the question is what do we
Speaker 2: do about this. Macron defended this by characterizing free expression
Speaker 2: online as a form of brainwashing. So when you brainwashing
Speaker 2: gaslight a kid about what sex they are, that's okay.
Speaker 2: Just don't do it online, because we don't want people
Speaker 2: passing information back and forth about narratives that were lying
Speaker 2: to them about about climate change, about the vaccines, about
Speaker 2: the pandemics, about what they're doing actually with each other.
Speaker 2: Macron invoked the Digital Services Act as a foundation for
Speaker 2: expanded censorship across Europe. Said, this is a very important
Speaker 2: regulation because it is the first time that we've created
Speaker 2: a framework to regulate the Internet. And of course they're
Speaker 2: not going to regulate it in any way that is reasonable.
Speaker 2: They simply want to regulate it to shut up dissent
Speaker 2: and to punish dissenters and protesters. He offered a familiar
Speaker 2: list to speech categories and he wants to suppress. Of course,
Speaker 2: the first one is going to be racist speech. That's
Speaker 2: the first refuge of these scoundrels. Then hateful speech, then
Speaker 2: anti Semitic speech. Yeah, you don't criticize Benjamin Netnaho, because
Speaker 2: you know that minority government of Israel represents all Jews,
Speaker 2: and you know there's a lot of Jews who don't
Speaker 2: like that idea. Just like I would not want to
Speaker 2: be represented by the Trump administration, they don't want to
Speaker 2: be represented by the net Yahoo administration. They disagree with
Speaker 2: their policies. These terms have no fixed legal definition that
Speaker 2: applies uniformly across the EU member states. You know, what
Speaker 2: is hate speech? What is racism? By the way, what
Speaker 2: is anti Semitism? If you even asked that question, as
Speaker 2: Carrie pre Gene Baller found out, you get kicked off
Speaker 2: of the Religious Liberty Commission. What a joke set up
Speaker 2: by Trump. German Chancellor Fred Mertz, he's got some splanning
Speaker 2: to do, Lucy. A divide has opened up between the Europe,
Speaker 2: between Europe and the United States, he said. Jd. Vance
Speaker 2: said this openly here at the Munich Security Conference a
Speaker 2: year ago, and he was right. The battle of cultures
Speaker 2: of Maga in the US is not ours. Freedom of
Speaker 2: speech here ends where the words spoken are directed against
Speaker 2: the government. Oh no, he said, human dignity, He means
Speaker 2: right and basic law, he said, So we have laws
Speaker 2: about what you can say and your right to free
Speaker 2: speech ends, for we say it ends, and we call
Speaker 2: that human dignity. What cynical liars they are. You know,
Speaker 2: that's one of the key things of BF. Skinner, because
Speaker 2: this is all really about behavioral psychology, and he's really
Speaker 2: kind of the I don't know the father of behavioral psychology,
Speaker 2: but he certainly advanced it a great deal. And his
Speaker 2: book was called Beyond Freedom and Dignity, and that's where
Speaker 2: these people are. And yet that is the German cynical
Speaker 2: way of describing human dignity is the phrase that the
Speaker 2: German governments have used to justify prosecuting speech. They prosecute
Speaker 2: speech in the name of human dignity. Imagine that they've
Speaker 2: attributed it to cover anything from insults to the Holocaust denier.
Speaker 2: So Israel always is at the forefront of this censorship,
Speaker 2: if you notice this, right, And so the question is
Speaker 2: why are they desperately pushing this? Well, I've seen that
Speaker 2: whenever somebody is desperately trying to hide some things because
Speaker 2: they're lying to you about it. Have you noticed that
Speaker 2: they lie to you about the pandemic, They lied to
Speaker 2: you about the vaccine, they lied to you about climate change.
Speaker 2: They lie to you about the wars, they lie to
Speaker 2: you about what they're going to do. Everything that they
Speaker 2: want to censor is something that exposes those lies. So
Speaker 2: European Commissioned President Ursula fond of Lying joined the censorship
Speaker 2: chorus at the Munich Security Conference. It's their security, not
Speaker 2: your security. Just like national security has nothing to do
Speaker 2: with the safety and the freedom and the security of Americans.
Speaker 2: It has everything to do with the security of the
Speaker 2: government and its continuity of governance, staying in their jobs,
Speaker 2: staying in office, staying in power, staying in control. It
Speaker 2: has nothing to do with our safety, nothing to do
Speaker 2: with our security. A fond of Lying described European speech
Speaker 2: regulation is under attack from the US, so they have
Speaker 2: wielded the threats of tariffs on partners to secure preferential
Speaker 2: access and to cry the EU's digital rules as an
Speaker 2: assault on free speech. Well, because they are as unfortunate
Speaker 2: that the Trump administration, while decrying the censorship of the EU,
Speaker 2: is busy doing the same thing here, except in a
Speaker 2: more hidden and devious way. The EU's digital rules are
Speaker 2: an assault on free speech. The DSA empowers bureaucrats to
Speaker 2: demand platforms remove content under threat of massive fines. She
Speaker 2: claimed that Europe has a long tradition of freedom of speech,
Speaker 2: and she's told the truth about that. What she doesn't
Speaker 2: say is that Ursula a fond of lying, and Fred
Speaker 2: Mertz and Emmanuel Macron the rest of these EU leaders.
Speaker 2: After Europe has got a long tradition of free speech,
Speaker 2: their mission is to end that tradition, to destroy that,
Speaker 2: and to do it in the name of dignity and democracy.
Speaker 2: What cynical liars they are. The leaders who gathered in Munich, Writes,
Speaker 2: reclaimed the net spoke of protecting democracy while proposing tools
Speaker 2: that would let governments identify and punish dissent. They invoked
Speaker 2: free speech while demanding the power to decide what speech
Speaker 2: is free. They claim to defend Europe while stripping Europeans
Speaker 2: of the ability to speak freely online, and they've openly
Speaker 2: declared their intention to do so for quite some time.
Speaker 4: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet LAOS, your annual Global Risk
Speaker 4: Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
Speaker 4: global business community. The top concern for the next two
Speaker 4: years is not conf a climate, It is disinformation and misinformation.
Speaker 4: For not closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 3: You are listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 5: Imagine if we had to go through the process of
Speaker 5: getting a judicial warrant, an additional warrant to go and
Speaker 5: apprehend people who.
Speaker 2: We are such you're always needed. You're lawyers. Come on,
Speaker 2: we have enough judges. We don't have enough time.
Speaker 5: It would take decades probably to do that. The people
Speaker 5: who are advocating for that don't want any immigration enforcement.
Speaker 2: They do not Yeah, well you don't want it either,
Speaker 2: because you just decided that you're going to basically double
Speaker 2: the amount of money that's given to people like the
Speaker 2: smallions who come in here on the refugee program six
Speaker 2: billion dollars, while you're going to jump it by another
Speaker 2: five billion. Right, it's the welfare magnet. Stupid And of
Speaker 2: course they create the problem, and then they use the
Speaker 2: created problem to argue that we need to throw out
Speaker 2: the constitution, due process, the bill of rights. Courts have jailed,
Speaker 2: have ruled that ICE has illegally jailed people more than
Speaker 2: forty four hundred times in just the last five months.
Speaker 2: Judges across the country have ruled the more than forty
Speaker 2: four hundred times since the start of October that the
Speaker 2: US government has illegally detained immigrants, according to Reuter's investigations
Speaker 2: published on Saturday. Now, I know I've gotten a lot
Speaker 2: of people who have contacted me and said, no, these
Speaker 2: rights are not for illegal aliens that are here.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 2: We have due process for people that we know committed crimes,
Speaker 2: don't we You see somebody, you've got a video of
Speaker 2: somebody committing a or they still get due process. Why
Speaker 2: do we do that? Why don't we just take them
Speaker 2: out and shoot them, which the Trump administration Steven Miller
Speaker 2: would love to do to anybody. Forget about the due process.
Speaker 2: We suspect your drug dealers, let's just shoot you on
Speaker 2: the street. Like Robert du Terte, the leader of the Philippines.
Speaker 2: Extra judicial killings are all for that. Trump cheered that
Speaker 2: on the streets of the Philippines. He's cheered it, and
Speaker 2: the water is off of Venezuela. They don't care about
Speaker 2: due process, they don't care about making sure they got
Speaker 2: the right person before they even execute people. So of
Speaker 2: course they have contempt for a due process in terms
Speaker 2: of arrest. And let me just say this, there's nothing
Speaker 2: in the Bill of Rights. There's nothing in the Declaration
Speaker 2: of Independence that says that we have these rights because
Speaker 2: we are American citizens. If that were the case, that
Speaker 2: would change your god given rights into government granted privileges.
Speaker 2: You need to understand that all you people who are
Speaker 2: out there, good good do do all this stuff. These
Speaker 2: people very illegally. Yeah, they've committed a crime. Let's make
Speaker 2: sure the punishment is proportional to it, that is not excessive.
Speaker 2: Let's make sure that it's not unusual, and let's go
Speaker 2: through due process. Because if you let them use cruel,
Speaker 2: unusual and excessive punishment, if you let them skip due
Speaker 2: process on your fellow human beings that are out there
Speaker 2: who maybe probably are guilty, obviously guilty of committing crime.
Speaker 2: So you know, have a process for handling this and
Speaker 2: send them back to where they came from. Most importantly,
Speaker 2: you could stop handing them out money. But Mike Johnson
Speaker 2: is that the head of the list shoving out money
Speaker 2: to people that he claims are so bad they shouldn't
Speaker 2: have any due process. Cynical again what they are doing.
Speaker 2: And so just be careful because the government that ignores
Speaker 2: the humanity of people who have committed crimes. Even if
Speaker 2: they've committed crimes, you don't ignore their humanity. That's why
Speaker 2: the Bill rights exists. If you let them get away
Speaker 2: with that with other people, they will do that to you.
Speaker 2: They'll do that to your children, to your family. They'll
Speaker 2: do that to Americans. So again, the number of people
Speaker 2: on ice custody has ballooned to sixty eight thousand this month,
Speaker 2: seventy five percent higher than when Trump took office. Midway
Speaker 2: through twenty twenty five, the administration began pushing for daily
Speaker 2: quotas of three thousand arrests per day, with the goal
Speaker 2: of reaching a million per year. This has led to
Speaker 2: the targeting of mostly people with no criminal records, rather
Speaker 2: than the supposedly worst of the worst that they keep saying.
Speaker 2: This has also resulted in a staggering number of arrests
Speaker 2: that judges have found later to be illegal. And it's
Speaker 2: another reason why when somebody is going through the process
Speaker 2: of getting their green card or applying for American citizenship
Speaker 2: or something, they go in and the arrest of people
Speaker 2: in the courtrooms, well, that's low hanging fruit. That's like, hey,
Speaker 2: look I got my quota in this month. We ought
Speaker 2: to be disgusted about that. Yeah, it's like the speed
Speaker 2: trap in a town or something. It's not anything that
Speaker 2: helps us. This is a cynical abuse of power by
Speaker 2: law enforcement, quote unquote. Since the beginning of the Trump term,
Speaker 2: immigrants have filed more than twenty two hundred Habeas corpus
Speaker 2: petitions claiming that they were held indefinitely without trial and
Speaker 2: violation of the Constitution, and at least four hundred and
Speaker 2: twenty one cases. Listen to this, more than four hundred
Speaker 2: federal judges. I can't tell you the number of times
Speaker 2: that every time something like this happens and a federal
Speaker 2: judge slaps down these authoritarian, illegal, unconstitutional policies. Every time
Speaker 2: that happens, you see the Trump cults say, oh, that's
Speaker 2: just a Democrat judge or something. Four hundred federal judges
Speaker 2: in forty four hundred cases have ruled that their detentions
Speaker 2: were illegal. Last month, more than six thousand Habeas petitioners
Speaker 2: petitions were filed. Prior to the second Trump administration, No
Speaker 2: other month dating back to twenty ten had seen even
Speaker 2: five hundred. Now they had six thousand. So again, well,
Speaker 2: we can't bother with following the law, says the Speaker
Speaker 2: of the House, Mike Johnson, a lawyer. Let's just forget
Speaker 2: about the law. Maybe he got to have his his
Speaker 2: license revoked? Right? What did lawyers even believe that? I mean,
Speaker 2: if you get admitted to the bar and you decide
Speaker 2: that you need to just ignore the Bill Wrights and
Speaker 2: the Constitution as an elected leader, isn't that grounds for
Speaker 2: removing your license by the bar. It should be, you know,
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact, I think they got rid
Speaker 2: of Bill Clinton. I'm just going to memory here, but
Speaker 2: I think they got rid of his license to practice
Speaker 2: law when he committed perjury. They've done that for other people.
Speaker 2: What if you break your oath to the Constitution? Is
Speaker 2: that grounds? Evidently not. In ruling last month, Chief Justice
Speaker 2: Chief Judge Patrick Schlitz of the U. S. District Court
Speaker 2: in Minnesota, a conservative judge appointed by Bush. W. Bush,
Speaker 2: provided a list of nearly one hundred court orders that
Speaker 2: I SID violated just that month while deployed as part
Speaker 2: of Trump's Operation Metro Surge. Meanwhile, the alex Pretty shooting
Speaker 2: investigation Minnesota, the FBI has told Minnesota law enforcement, we
Speaker 2: will give you absolutely no information, will not share anything
Speaker 2: with you, and they said this is unprecedented Minnesota Bureau
Speaker 2: of Criminal Apprehension. So the FBI formally noted this agency
Speaker 2: on Friday that it will quote not provide the BCA
Speaker 2: with access to any information or evidence that it has
Speaker 2: collected in the shooting death of Alex Pretty. While this
Speaker 2: lack of corporation is concerning and unprecedented, the BCA is
Speaker 2: committed to thorough, independent, and transparent investigations of these incidents,
Speaker 2: even if hampered by a lack of access to key
Speaker 2: information and evidence. Maybe what the FBI stands for is
Speaker 2: fed's blocking investigation. They have done this time and again,
Speaker 2: talked about this many times. One of the most interesting
Speaker 2: ones that they blocked, well documented was the investigation of
Speaker 2: Flight eight hundred. The FBI blocked that investigation as well.
Speaker 2: And here they are blocking this investigation. Just amazing how
Speaker 2: perverted the federal government has become. Before we take a break,
Speaker 2: we've got Georgia boy eleven forty two said David forgot
Speaker 2: to verify his age. It's kind of frightening for me
Speaker 2: to verify my age. Is then you know, you get
Speaker 2: to the point where you know when you lick in
Speaker 2: the mirror and verify your age. It's like, who is
Speaker 2: that person? I don't know who that is, but maybe
Speaker 2: that's why they kicked me off right, I didn't verify
Speaker 2: my age. I think it has something else to do
Speaker 2: with content. Malt Van Milakovich. Milton Malakovich has gifted a
Speaker 2: sub on Rumble, Thank you very much and Guard Goldsmith
Speaker 2: Liberty Conspiracy. Good to see you, Guard. He said, the
Speaker 2: Feds are buying a warehouse in the town bordering ours
Speaker 2: and putting in an ice detention camp. They're buying warehouses
Speaker 2: all over the place. This is an insane policy when
Speaker 2: you stop and thinking about what is the purpose of this? Really,
Speaker 2: the purpose is to boast about the kinetic actions that
Speaker 2: they're doing. Look, we're tough guys, we're going to take
Speaker 2: care of this, and we got numbers that we're going
Speaker 2: to produce to give it to you. I remember when
Speaker 2: the Vietnam War was being conducted by Robert McNamara, and
Speaker 2: it was all about his body cam ounce they're not
Speaker 2: they were right. He didn't really care about anything except
Speaker 2: how many people did we kill him? How many people
Speaker 2: of ours did they kill? That was the entire calculus.
Speaker 2: Of what they were doing. Well, we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
Speaker 7: Daddy.
Speaker 3: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. I want to thank the people who have
Speaker 2: supported us and give our supporters and donors an idea
Speaker 2: of where we are this month. We haven't well. We
Speaker 2: have updated the gas gauge on the website Davidnight dot News,
Speaker 2: but there's not a spot there for a third. So
Speaker 2: we're right now we're at thirty three percent. Karen has
Speaker 2: it at a quarter. We're going to leave it there
Speaker 2: till we get just a little bit closer to the
Speaker 2: three eighths. And I want to thank people who have
Speaker 2: supported us on zeal. We read the names. I'll read
Speaker 2: the first name, last initial. William D. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: We have Maryland. Let me see if this is a
Speaker 2: C or a G. That is a G, Marylyn, Carl H,
Speaker 2: Michael L. Lyndon H. Susan L. Sean S. Felicia H.
Speaker 2: Daniel C. Susan L. Again, Mary M. Gregory I and
Speaker 2: Benjamin R. Thank you very much for your support. And
Speaker 2: there were three names the other day when I mentioned
Speaker 2: checks that have been sent to us that got left off.
Speaker 2: The sellers, Sylvia d and Kelly and Philip. Thank you
Speaker 2: so much, all of you, because that's what makes this
Speaker 2: show possible. We don't put things behind a paywall. We
Speaker 2: just trust people to support the program if they find
Speaker 2: it valuable. Let's talk a little bit about well.
Speaker 8: Also, if you would like to find out where you
Speaker 8: can support the show, you can go to Davidknight dot News.
Speaker 8: You've got all the links there. Of course, subscribe Star
Speaker 8: dot com, forward slash The David Knight Show is a
Speaker 8: great place to support the show. You can set it
Speaker 8: up and it's fire and forget. You can also subscribe
Speaker 8: on substack, where we post the show and also links
Speaker 8: the articles covered on the show every single day. Yes,
Speaker 8: and you get those on subscribe star as well.
Speaker 2: Travis Nose because he's the one to posts them up there.
Speaker 8: That's that's right.
Speaker 2: It's quite a job to have to do that each day.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of places that we post the show
Speaker 2: and you can find those places at David Knight not News.
Speaker 2: Sometimes it can be difficult on some of these platforms
Speaker 2: to find the show. I don't know why they do that.
Speaker 2: It's funny about that. But yeah, if we are not
Speaker 2: banned on a platform, sometimes we are kind of shadow
Speaker 2: banded on the platform. So if you want to link
Speaker 2: to where you can find the show, video or audio,
Speaker 2: the best way to do that is to go to
Speaker 2: Davidnight dot news.
Speaker 8: And of course, wherever you're watching or listening, please leave
Speaker 8: a like on the show.
Speaker 2: H That's a big help. That's a big help. Thank
Speaker 2: you so much. All Right, let's talk a little bit
Speaker 2: about the immigration issue itself, as we have laughed about
Speaker 2: this and joked about it. As Lance said the other day,
Speaker 2: why do I have to be either team open border
Speaker 2: or team federal police beating people on the streets? So
Speaker 2: why do we have to Why are those our only
Speaker 2: two choices? Isn't there another way? Well, of course there is.
Speaker 2: It's the welfare magnet that the Trump administration has just
Speaker 2: nearly doubled for people who are coming in as refugees.
Speaker 2: Reports show. These are new studies that have come out.
Speaker 2: This is an article from the New American report shows
Speaker 2: that most immigrants get some form of welfare. Sixty one
Speaker 2: percent of illegal aliens get welfare. I've always said it's
Speaker 2: the welfare magnet. Stupid, It's not the wall or anything else.
Speaker 2: It's the biggest issue. If you've got a big welfare magnet,
Speaker 2: people are going to find some way to get in.
Speaker 2: So again, a majority of immigrant households, more than fifty percent,
Speaker 2: are on welfare. Smalies in Minnesota receive some form of welfare,
Speaker 2: almost ninety percent of them. And there has been an
Speaker 2: explosion and some malies who have come in again, they're
Speaker 2: not walking across the border. You're not going to stop
Speaker 2: them with a wall. They're being incentivized by all these
Speaker 2: different administrations. I mean, when there were no Somalies at all,
Speaker 2: before they started coming in, there was hardly any money
Speaker 2: in the refugee program. Then by the time they started
Speaker 2: coming in, they ramped it up to a couple of
Speaker 2: billion dollars and it gradually has increased until the last
Speaker 2: three years it's been six billion dollars a year now.
Speaker 2: This is not including the welfare fraud that they've engaged in,
Speaker 2: criminal fraud for which they've not been punished for which
Speaker 2: we knew they were doing this back in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2: It was reported on I reported on it back then,
Speaker 2: and the Trump administration didn't do anything about it. The
Speaker 2: Biden administration didn't do anything about The second Trump administration
Speaker 2: did nothing about it until you had a reporter show
Speaker 2: it to everybody. Then they got interested. But they still
Speaker 2: haven't rounded these people up and stopped it. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is the type of thing. Or if you look
Speaker 2: at al Capone, it was the tax auditors that took
Speaker 2: him down. It was the accountants who took him down.
Speaker 2: It wasn't Elliott Ness and his untouchables, and it's not
Speaker 2: Christinoman her untouchables. The ice criminals are around there. So again,
Speaker 2: refugee funding then increased by Trump this year as they
Speaker 2: are talking about all this stuff, they're not getting rid
Speaker 2: of the somalies. Instead, what they're doing is they're increasing
Speaker 2: the refugee fund from six billion dollars to eleven billion dollars,
Speaker 2: an eighty percent increase, nearly doubling it. And so still
Speaker 2: nothing happening with the fraud. Immigrants are a bottomless drain
Speaker 2: on taxpayer resources and they contribute virtually nothing to the
Speaker 2: fiscal health of the federal and state treasuries either. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, we keep ramping this up. Fifty
Speaker 2: three percent of immigrant headed households, according to a survey
Speaker 2: that is done by cis fifty three percent. Include naturalized citizens,
Speaker 2: legal residents, and illegal aliens are using at least one
Speaker 2: major welfare program. Just thirty seven percent of American born
Speaker 2: households use a welfare program, so Americans thirty seven percent,
Speaker 2: for illegal and even legal immigrants fifty three percent. And
Speaker 2: of course this is not counting the schools. When we
Speaker 2: were in Texas, they were building one school after the
Speaker 2: other because of all the illegal aliens coming in, all
Speaker 2: the kids that they were bringing in.
Speaker 8: I mentioned this before, but when we lived in Austin,
Speaker 8: I got stuck behind a school bus for you know,
Speaker 8: thirty minutes something like that. I didn't see them offload
Speaker 8: a single white kid.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, all foreigners coming in. Welfare use by non
Speaker 2: citizen households, illegals on Green card holders is fifty nine percent.
Speaker 2: They get free healthcare compared to households headed by the
Speaker 2: US born. Immigrant headed households have especially high use of
Speaker 2: food programs thirty five percent versus twenty two percent. Medicaid,
Speaker 2: you have thirty nine percent of foreigners on it versus
Speaker 2: twenty seven percent for Americans. Earned income tax credit fifteen
Speaker 2: percent for foreigners, ten percent for US born illegals use
Speaker 2: welfare at a much higher rate than legal immigrants, sixty
Speaker 2: one to fifty one percent. So again it's worse for
Speaker 2: the illegals, and it's much worse for immigrants. It's worse
Speaker 2: for immigrants in general than Americans using the program, and
Speaker 2: much worse for illegals. And of course this is what
Speaker 2: Cloward and Piven knew. Cloward and Piven said, you know,
Speaker 2: we've been trying to take down the American system using welfare,
Speaker 2: but the Americans aren't signing up for it enough. So
Speaker 2: let's bring in people from other countries that'll do it,
Speaker 2: that'll collapse it using welfare. That is the Cloward and
Speaker 2: Pivot strategy, and it's working. You know, the research shows
Speaker 2: us excluding the extensively used but less costly school lunch
Speaker 2: and breakfast program. Now they're going to talk about school
Speaker 2: lunch and breakfast program. They're not going to talk about
Speaker 2: schools in general, the massive cost of schools, the buildings,
Speaker 2: the teachers, the buses, everything about it.
Speaker 8: And of course, if they're putting up signs, if companies
Speaker 8: like Walmart having to put up signs in other languages,
Speaker 8: they're having to hire teachers that speak these languages. Yes,
Speaker 8: they're not just able to hire any old teacher off
Speaker 8: the street.
Speaker 2: Oh, let's not teach them English at all. You know,
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact, that's one of the issues
Speaker 2: in this particular thing here, when you look at the
Speaker 2: smallies and the fact that they're not learning English, that
Speaker 2: is the key issue and why they are not succeeding.
Speaker 2: You're not going to be able to get a good
Speaker 2: job if you can't speak English. It's just a given.
Speaker 2: And they have absolutely no interest in learning how to
Speaker 2: speak English. And so Children on the Nutrition Program of Women,
Speaker 2: Infants in Children shows that forty seven percent of immigrant
Speaker 2: households versus thirty four percent of American households use at
Speaker 2: least one of the remaining programs. The numbers show that
Speaker 2: fifty nine percent of non citizen headed households are on welfare,
Speaker 2: fifty three percent of immigrant headed households are twenty one
Speaker 2: percent of illegal and legal immigrant households get cash assistance,
Speaker 2: forty four and thirty two percent, respectively, get food assistants,
Speaker 2: forty four and thirty eight percent go on Medicaid, and
Speaker 2: bottom line, when you start looking at these comparative numbers,
Speaker 2: you're finding that twenty to fifty percent higher use of welfare,
Speaker 2: subsidies and things like that for people who were not
Speaker 2: American born, and they're not even counting the schools. For
Speaker 2: those here less than a decade, the rate is forty
Speaker 2: eight percent, but for those who have here more than
Speaker 2: a decade, it goes up to fifty four percent. They're
Speaker 2: gaining the system even more after they come. Eighty six
Speaker 2: percent of all immigrant households have at least one worker,
Speaker 2: compared with just seventy four percent of US born households.
Speaker 2: Income determines welfare eligibility, so many low wage workers are
Speaker 2: on welfare. Immigrant households without children, however, and those with
Speaker 2: higher incomes and those that are headed by well educated immigrants,
Speaker 2: tend to be more likely to use welfare than the
Speaker 2: US born counterparts. So it's not just well, these people
Speaker 2: are poor, they're not making any money. No, the people
Speaker 2: who have, people who are making higher incomes, people have
Speaker 2: a higher education, but who are immigrants are more likely
Speaker 2: to use the welfare. It's a cultural thing. The question
Speaker 2: is how immigrants who are forbidden from receiving welfare get
Speaker 2: so much of it while they collect benefits because of
Speaker 2: their anchor baby kids. The prohibition excluded some programs. Most
Speaker 2: legal immigrants have lived here long enough to qualify for welfare.
Speaker 2: States provide their own welfare, and naturalized immigrants can, of
Speaker 2: course jump on the dole of a minute they take
Speaker 2: the oath of citizenship. The big problem with immigrants on
Speaker 2: welfare isn't just the money that they collect, it's the
Speaker 2: tax revenue that they don't contribute. The federal government spends
Speaker 2: roughly one trillion dollars every year collectively on the above programs,
Speaker 2: which represents a substantial share of the federal budget. And
Speaker 2: again that's not even counting the free quote unquote education,
Speaker 2: which an education which, by the way, trashes American values. Right.
Speaker 2: It's not enough that we have to pay property taxes
Speaker 2: and can't own homes because of the cost of the schools.
Speaker 2: What the schools are doing is they are doing everything
Speaker 2: they can to make the kids hate their own bodies,
Speaker 2: but also to hate their own country. And so that's
Speaker 2: very easy to do with foreigners coming in, and then
Speaker 2: you have Somalia, the welfare bonanza that's there. Cis warned
Speaker 2: that the high rate of welfare use should not be
Speaker 2: seen as immigrants who are gaming the system, unless you're
Speaker 2: talking about Somalia, and then they said it truly is
Speaker 2: a organized gaming of the system, major welfare fraud operations
Speaker 2: in which almost ninety percent of Somalis get some form
Speaker 2: of welfare. Ninety percent they speak little, if any English,
Speaker 2: They are virtually illiterate, and they are a sinkhole for
Speaker 2: tax dollars. Even without all the fraud, almost forty percent
Speaker 2: of them live below the poverty line. Fifty two percent
Speaker 2: of kids and Somali immigrant homes live in poverty. The
Speaker 2: strongest predictors of poverty are low education and a lack
Speaker 2: of English language ability. And so virtually all native Minnesotans
Speaker 2: speak English very well, but fifty eight percent of working
Speaker 2: age Somalis do not speak English, forty percent don't have
Speaker 2: a high school diploma. Twenty one percent of working age
Speaker 2: Somali men are unemployed. I put this in context. Antonine
Speaker 2: Scolia was speaking abroad when he was talking about the
Speaker 2: importance of culture and really what it is. I want
Speaker 2: you to hear what he had to say about this,
Speaker 2: that it really does give you an understanding why the
Speaker 2: Somalis are not ever going to fit in here if
Speaker 2: they don't learn to speak English.
Speaker 9: Diversity alone is not what makes a great nation. I mean,
Speaker 9: diversity alone makes some of the tribal societies of the
Speaker 9: world that never quite make it, such as some of
Speaker 9: the places in the Middle East where we're trying to
Speaker 9: establish a nationhood. As I said earlier, it's part of
Speaker 9: our tradition that everybody can be an American. But there
Speaker 9: has been a common a common culture. You don't have
Speaker 9: to belong to it, but there has been that. Okay,
Speaker 9: you want to know what it is?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 10: I want is there a bond?
Speaker 3: Is there a common culu?
Speaker 2: I think?
Speaker 9: Let me tell you a story. My junior year college,
Speaker 9: I studied in Switzerland, and I used to get really
Speaker 9: annoyed when the French Swiss professors I had would refer
Speaker 9: constantly to Lespey Anglo Sacks in the Anglo Saxon countries
Speaker 9: meaning England, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Okay, Canada.
Speaker 9: I said, you know, hey, my name is Scalia and
Speaker 9: I'm as American as anybody. Look at this face. Is
Speaker 9: this an Anglo Saxon face. I had never been in England,
Speaker 9: but at the end of my year I went to
Speaker 9: England and I felt at home. There is no doubt
Speaker 9: that American culture. American common culture, which nobody has to
Speaker 9: belong to, originates with English culture, and that includes Shakespeare
Speaker 9: and includes nursery rhymes that we all know and that
Speaker 9: we use as examples. That's our common culture. And I
Speaker 9: think the Framers recognized that. And diversity is fine, but
Speaker 9: diversity does not make a nation.
Speaker 2: That's right. It's nations, tongues and tribes. That's the way
Speaker 2: the Bible understands it and explains it. That was back
Speaker 2: in two thousand and six, by the way, and you know,
Speaker 2: that's what he said really hit home with me because
Speaker 2: that was the reason that it took Careen for a
Speaker 2: honeymoon to the UK. We spent a lot of time
Speaker 2: in London going through free museums. It was It's a
Speaker 2: great time, but that was a key thing, the culture,
Speaker 2: the language, you know, just as he points out Shakespeare,
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff is amazing to see it.
Speaker 2: And even though we have a you know, American culture
Speaker 2: is different from the UK's culture, there's been a divergence.
Speaker 2: There's still that baseline that's there. And he didn't mention,
Speaker 2: interestingly enough, our common law, you know, going Supreme Court judge,
Speaker 2: a lot of this stuff It traces back to the
Speaker 2: magnet Carter and traces back when you look at things
Speaker 2: like habeas corpus, for example, locking people up without having
Speaker 2: any law that allows you to do that. You know,
Speaker 2: that goes back to dury qualification cases that we talked
Speaker 2: about many times here. You know, the the ordeal of
Speaker 2: Edwin Bushnell. William Penn, who was in the UK before
Speaker 2: he came to America and you know, started the state
Speaker 2: there Pennsylvania with the Quakers set that up. They were
Speaker 2: meeting and had their Quaker church in violation of the law.
Speaker 2: Church of England was the only one that you were
Speaker 2: allowed to go to, but they did it anyway. They
Speaker 2: locked the doors to their church building, they held their
Speaker 2: church services on the steps. Then they arrested William Penn,
Speaker 2: and the jury didn't agree with that law. There should
Speaker 2: not be a prohibition as to how people worship God,
Speaker 2: and so they let him go, and the judge was furious.
Speaker 2: It was clear that he had violated the law. But
Speaker 2: the jury looked at the law and they said that
Speaker 2: law is awful. We're going to nullify it. And so
Speaker 2: the judge, in his anger, locked up the foreman and
Speaker 2: the assistant foreman and he didn't have any reason to
Speaker 2: do that, and so they stayed in jail for a while,
Speaker 2: like some of these migrants that were there, and then
Speaker 2: their lawyer said, show me the law habeas corpus. Showed
Speaker 2: me the body of law that these people violated for
Speaker 2: you to lock them up, and he had to let
Speaker 2: them go. That was a very important trom because it
Speaker 2: established habeas corpus. It also established jury nullification. These types
Speaker 2: of traditions that go back for a very long time.
Speaker 2: All of these things are being overturned. And that's why
Speaker 2: it is necessary for them to overturn our cultures, why
Speaker 2: it's necessary for them to bring in people who a
Speaker 2: don't speak English and b don't care to ever learn
Speaker 2: to speak English. They don't have anything to do with
Speaker 2: what this country is about. And that's the bottom line.
Speaker 2: And these types of totalitarian authoritarian quote unquote enforcement is
Speaker 2: backfiring big time on all this. It's going to push
Speaker 2: a lot of people towards the open border position because
Speaker 2: a lot of people realize just how dangerous this is
Speaker 2: and we should not be supporting it in any way,
Speaker 2: shape or form. It is a dagger that is aimed
Speaker 2: at our chest, not just the people who are here illegally.
Speaker 2: If you have police that are giving cart Blanc to
Speaker 2: just walk down the street, if they think that you
Speaker 2: are engaged in criminal activity, to just kill you, as
Speaker 2: Trump cheered when dou Terte was doing that in the Philippines.
Speaker 2: If you do that here in America, we are all
Speaker 2: in jeopardy. That's why this is so important that we
Speaker 2: get this right. Well, some people obviously are above the law,
Speaker 2: and I guess we can put into that category Bear
Speaker 2: and Monsanto. Bear stock has soared after a settlement a
Speaker 2: mere ten billion dollars on current and future roundup cancer lawsuits.
Speaker 2: Ten billion dollar settlement and to settle current and future
Speaker 2: cancer lawsuits. So this will save them from many potential
Speaker 2: claims that could be filed over a twenty year period.
Speaker 2: So regardless of how many people they kill with their
Speaker 2: life as it, regardless of how people get non Hodgkins lymphoma,
Speaker 2: they now know that they don't have to pay more
Speaker 2: than this ten billion dollars, which is chicken feed to them.
Speaker 2: Bear bought Monsanto for sixty billion dollars, and this stuff
Speaker 2: was already on the table, and they rightly calculated that
Speaker 2: they wouldn't have to pay for these lawsuits. Barrett also
Speaker 2: announced a three billion dollars settlement of existing US cases
Speaker 2: in which former round Up users blamed the herbicide for
Speaker 2: causing their non Hodgkins lymphoma. Yeah, that killed our dog.
Speaker 2: Our neighbor liked to use weed treatment on their yard
Speaker 2: and we would lock him up, but he escaped and
Speaker 2: repeatedly and he got over there and also killed a
Speaker 2: friend of ours who worked for us with a video store.
Speaker 2: I died from this, and I remember when our dog
Speaker 2: was going through it, and there was a report on
Speaker 2: the radio where they're talking about people who worked agricultural
Speaker 2: workers working on farms and how they were getting this
Speaker 2: high rate of non Hodgkins lymphoma. That's when we put
Speaker 2: two and two together. The company has paid about ten
Speaker 2: billion dollars to settle most of these round Up lawsuits
Speaker 2: they were pending as of twenty twenty, but they fail
Speaker 2: to get a settlement covering future cases. So now they've
Speaker 2: been given immunity from paying for this regardless of how
Speaker 2: many people and they give this to. And you know,
Speaker 2: glyph has said is so widely used that it now
Speaker 2: permeates our food supply. Really times, by the way, let
Speaker 2: me just say this while we're talking about cancer. You're
Speaker 2: not helpless about this kind of stuff. Go to RNC
Speaker 2: store dot com. They've got the books that help you
Speaker 2: to understand what's going on with this stuff. One that
Speaker 2: I would recommend highly is one by G. Edward Griffin,
Speaker 2: a man of the utmost intelligence and integrity. A world
Speaker 2: without cancer, and you can get apricot seeds vitamin B seventeen,
Speaker 2: very effective. One of the best things you can do
Speaker 2: to protect yourself because folks, the government is not going
Speaker 2: to protect you. They're going to allow big rich corporations
Speaker 2: like Bear and Moncento, They're going to allow them to
Speaker 2: poison our food with cancer causing chemicals. So one of
Speaker 2: the things that you know to do is go to
Speaker 2: rncstore dot com. And by the way, you can save
Speaker 2: ten percent if you use a code night. And I
Speaker 2: don't care if anybody criticizes me and thinks that this
Speaker 2: is I'm saying this because of money. I'm not saying
Speaker 2: it because of money. We don't get that much from it.
Speaker 3: But the.
Speaker 2: Bottom line is, you know, I accept adds some people
Speaker 2: whose products I believe in, and I believe in this stuff.
Speaker 2: I know people that have been helped by personally anyway.
Speaker 2: A new coalition is aiming to ban vaccine mandates across
Speaker 2: the US. And again I talked about this yesterday. It's
Speaker 2: not just the things that are happening in HHS with
Speaker 2: RFK Jr. But it's also several different organizations, including the
Speaker 2: Children's Health Defense that he founded. So they said the
Speaker 2: model state that they're trying to get to is Idaho,
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty five, Idaho enacted in a law that
Speaker 2: prohibits businesses and school from requiring customers, employees, and students
Speaker 2: to receive vaccines or other medical procedures. They call it
Speaker 2: the Idaho Medical Freedom Act. And folks, this is absolutely essential.
Speaker 2: How did we get to this point? Well, just to
Speaker 2: review quickly, we had two months before nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: we had their first germ game, which is called Dark Winter.
Speaker 2: One week after nine to eleven, they had the Anthracs attack.
Speaker 2: A couple of people were killed with anthracs. Two months
Speaker 2: after that, they put out model State legislation, Model State
Speaker 2: Emergency Powers Act. That's where they get the power. They
Speaker 2: set up the state power to mandate this kind of stuff,
Speaker 2: and then Trump writes them checks to bribe them. To
Speaker 2: do that twenty years later after they practiced it on
Speaker 2: an annual basis. So we've got to do this at
Speaker 2: the state level. We've got to stop this authority to
Speaker 2: mandate vaccines. They've done it in Idaho, and this is
Speaker 2: a coalition of different organizations that are working to do
Speaker 2: this at the state level. This is more important than
Speaker 2: what is happening at HHS. HHS can come in and
Speaker 2: change the vaccine schedule and then when these guys at
Speaker 2: the top leave, then they'll change it right back. The
Speaker 2: lasting change is at the state level. That's why the
Speaker 2: FEDS did that with their germ games, you know, Dark
Speaker 2: Winter nine to eleven, anthrax attack, boom. Here's your legislation,
Speaker 2: give this power to yourself at the state level. We
Speaker 2: need to remove that at the state level. This is
Speaker 2: one of the things that needs to be done, a
Speaker 2: very important thing. So because that past it really showed
Speaker 2: that this is possible. So our goal is to take
Speaker 2: this Idaho's Medical Freedom Act as many states as possible
Speaker 2: across the US. Children's Self Defense finds vaccine mandates and
Speaker 2: medical mandates to be reprehensible and we are honored to
Speaker 2: be a part of this coalition fighting to end forced
Speaker 2: medical procedures, to end medical mandates and vaccine mandates for
Speaker 2: all Americans. We should all aspire to that. And again,
Speaker 2: you know, trying to fix this in Washington is not
Speaker 2: going to last for long. If it works at all,
Speaker 2: with the next regime change, it'll come right back for
Speaker 2: the rubber weitts to road is at the state level.
Speaker 2: That's why these people put in the regulations at the
Speaker 2: state level. And of course of being fought by the
Speaker 2: pediatricians and some organization called American Families for Vaccines. I
Speaker 2: bet if you look that up, I didn't have time
Speaker 2: to do that. I bet there. Well. I know the
Speaker 2: American Academy of Pediatrics is heavily funded by big pharmaceutical companies,
Speaker 2: but I bet this American Family is for vaccines. That
Speaker 2: sounds like an AstroTurf organization, if ever there was one.
Speaker 2: The Idaho Medical Freedom Act says in part that a
Speaker 2: school quote shall not mandate a medical intervention for any
Speaker 2: person to attend, to enter campus or buildings, or to
Speaker 2: be employed. They said, every state in the country requires
Speaker 2: vaccines for school attendance. Some allow exemptions for religious or
Speaker 2: philosophical reasons, while all permit medical exemptions fartificials set in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five, they would be removing all vaccine mandates,
Speaker 2: but the goal has met resistance in the state legislature. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break, but before we do,
Speaker 2: I we'll to talk a little bit about what's going
Speaker 2: on with AI in terms of entertainment. And actually, this
Speaker 2: is one area where I think it's very positive. You know,
Speaker 2: when you look at the creation of images and movies
Speaker 2: and things like that, it can be very dangerous in
Speaker 2: terms of its ability to audit us, in terms of
Speaker 2: its ability to manipulate our opinions, in terms of pacifying us.
Speaker 2: You know, when you think about some of the movies
Speaker 2: like Arthur Right, which is basically based on PG Woadehouse's
Speaker 2: a series of Jeeves and Wooster Right, a couple of
Speaker 2: care characters out of stories of that and so. But
Speaker 2: you probably are more familiar with certainly familiar with Arthur
Speaker 2: and what you see over and over again with a
Speaker 2: stereotype right is you've got this upper class twit who
Speaker 2: has a very knowledgeable butler who does everything for him,
Speaker 2: and before you know, the guy can't do anything at
Speaker 2: all for himself. I thought it's kind of interesting that
Speaker 2: that was really kind of aspired to. Early on with
Speaker 2: the Internet, there was a kind of a search engine
Speaker 2: or something. Wasn't jeeves actually called back. Of course, they
Speaker 2: didn't have the chops, they didn't have the technology actually
Speaker 2: pull it off. Now you actually do have little jeeves
Speaker 2: out there, the AI agents and things like that, and
Speaker 2: people are getting pacified on it. So all of that
Speaker 2: is a danger. However, there's just been an update from
Speaker 2: Bite Dance there Sea Dance two point zero. I haven't
Speaker 2: used it, Lance hasn't used it, but stuff that I've
Speaker 2: seen coming out of it truly is amazing. And I've
Speaker 2: seen some posts on social media. One guy says, I've
Speaker 2: been working in film for about thirty years, and he goes,
Speaker 2: this is wonderful because I can do the script writing,
Speaker 2: I can do the cinematography, I can do all you know,
Speaker 2: I can do every aspect everything. I can do it myself.
Speaker 2: And it opens up the creative door for a lot
Speaker 2: of people, because frankly, Hollywood doesn't have a story to
Speaker 2: tell right. Truth and beauty left Hollywood a long, long,
Speaker 2: long time ago, and it's gotten very ugly in the
Speaker 2: interim there, and so it is creating because it's coming
Speaker 2: out of China. Of course, China doesn't have any interest
Speaker 2: at all in preserving intellectual property. It's kind of like, yeah,
Speaker 2: make this. As a matter of fact, they almost did.
Speaker 2: They are somebody like them did a video that basically
Speaker 2: taunted Disney, because Disney has been one of the most
Speaker 2: aggressive company in terms of protecting their intellectual property. I
Speaker 2: remember there was a daycare center that had some artists
Speaker 2: come in and they painted Disney characters on the wall
Speaker 2: right for the little kids and everything. Disney sought them
Speaker 2: out this one. It's not a franchise or anything, but
Speaker 2: they sought them out to make an example of them
Speaker 2: and hit them with lawyers, and they got picked up
Speaker 2: by the newspaper. Hannah Barbera sent their own artists and
Speaker 2: drew Fred Flintstone and the Jetsons and other characters like
Speaker 2: that on the wall for them to cover up the
Speaker 2: Disney stuff. But it's also used, and it's been used
Speaker 2: against me multiple times to try to silence us on
Speaker 2: political issues. The first and most obvious one was The
Speaker 2: Most Wonderful Life, which kind of added insult injury because
Speaker 2: they didn't even have a legitimate copyright. That's one of
Speaker 2: the things that Disney has done. Disney has extended their copyrights.
Speaker 2: They've gone to Congress and gotten special legislation just for
Speaker 2: themselves to extend copyrights over and over and over again,
Speaker 2: many times past the life of the people who created
Speaker 2: this stuff, and they've been very aggressive with that. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, we look at It's a wonderful life. That
Speaker 2: was in public domain. That's how it became popular. It
Speaker 2: was a failure when it first came out. Then with
Speaker 2: it being the public domain, it got to be very popular.
Speaker 2: I did the one hundredth anniversary of the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 2: of course I did. It's a wonderful lie because there
Speaker 2: were a lot of parallels to the banker there. Mister
Speaker 2: Potter was actually based on JP Morgan in terms of
Speaker 2: many different aspects and things they did, organizing runs against
Speaker 2: other banks and stuff like that. So I used that,
Speaker 2: but that was just it was used as fair use
Speaker 2: because there was a lot of commentary about the creation
Speaker 2: of the Federal Reserve, what people in Congress were saying
Speaker 2: at the time, how it would be abused, and the
Speaker 2: fact that it was abused that way, and even the
Speaker 2: numbers that they were talking about, the numbers that mister
Speaker 2: Potter was using to try to entice Bailey in order
Speaker 2: to join him. You know, the salary figures that he's
Speaker 2: throung out, the cost of the houses and things that
Speaker 2: there was a lot in a movie like that that
Speaker 2: you could draw in terms of the negative aspects of
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve has had. Well, they took that down.
Speaker 2: They said, that's a copyright violation. Well where did I
Speaker 2: get the clips that I used for that? I got
Speaker 2: them off of YouTube. Same people took me down for
Speaker 2: a copyright violation. The entire movie had been up for years.
Speaker 2: The entire movie had had over a million views on YouTube,
Speaker 2: and they took down my thing, which was covered under
Speaker 2: fair use. Even if it had a valid copyright, it
Speaker 2: would have been covered under fair use. It wasn't about
Speaker 2: the copyright issue at all. It was about what I
Speaker 2: was saying about the Federal Reserve. So I'm not really
Speaker 2: friendly to this, And of course the Hitchcock people did
Speaker 2: the same thing. We're going to do another mcguffin, though
Speaker 2: he doesn't own the term mcguffin. That's not owned by Hitchcock,
Speaker 2: and he doesn't own the music either. If the copyright
Speaker 2: rules have been there, you wouldn't have had a Hitchcock
Speaker 2: theme either. That was written by another composer long before
Speaker 2: they ever picked that up and used it. So Disney
Speaker 2: is at the center of this. And look at this.
Speaker 2: For people who are listening to this, I'll just describe
Speaker 2: the scene and then i'll play it for you. They
Speaker 2: have Arnold Schwarzenegger, RoboCop and Predator and the three of
Speaker 2: them are fighting. And then you have a little Mickey
Speaker 2: Mouse coming out in a suit, smoking a cigar like
Speaker 2: a wealthy ceo, and he holds up a sign and
Speaker 2: you know, to tell them that you cease and desist
Speaker 2: type of thing, and the three of them stomp him
Speaker 2: into the ground.
Speaker 7: Stop having fun, forbid you to generate.
Speaker 2: That's basically what's going on with this stuff. And you
Speaker 2: know it's again it's a complicated issue. But one of
Speaker 2: the reasons that this is coming up is because this
Speaker 2: isn't simply about protecting the intellectual property of people who
Speaker 2: are creators. This is something about corporations extending this in
Speaker 2: perpetuity and exploiting it in another way. And I'll play
Speaker 2: you just a little bit of this. This is somebody
Speaker 2: went back and did Austin Powers with a different cast, right,
Speaker 2: So they've got Tom Cruise as Austin Powers. They've got
Speaker 2: a Gwyneth Paltrow. There's a sidekick. Actually, they do have
Speaker 2: Michael Myers, who did Austin Powers. They have him, and
Speaker 2: that what I think is interesting is that you can
Speaker 2: these characters are so well defined and so well captured
Speaker 2: that you can identify who these actors are even though
Speaker 2: they are in a different role. They got Kevin Spacey
Speaker 2: is the villain. Was his name Evil or something? Doctor Evil?
Speaker 2: And his sidekick is Danny Divina Divino. And then that's
Speaker 2: even Spielberg in there as well. And they not only
Speaker 2: captured their voice, they captured their mannerisms and everything in this.
Speaker 2: Just take a look at this.
Speaker 11: Yeah, baby, Hi, I'm Dixie, Dixie enormous. I may just
Speaker 11: be a small town FBI agent slash single mother, but
Speaker 11: I'm still tough and sexy.
Speaker 3: Wow, that's enormous. Shall we shag now or shag later?
Speaker 1: Oh, Austin.
Speaker 10: A Power?
Speaker 4: You better watch your friggin self because this is one.
Speaker 12: Doctor who does make house calls.
Speaker 13: Right, Mini me, my assholes, I'm right over here.
Speaker 10: I'm Mini Me. Come and get me. That's a cut everybody.
Speaker 2: This is all done by AI and just a few prompts.
Speaker 13: Think about that, Austin, what do you think of the
Speaker 13: opening credits? Well, I can't believe, sir Steven Spielberg, the
Speaker 13: grooviest filmmaker the history of cinema, is making a movie
Speaker 13: about my life, very shagaedelic baby yeah.
Speaker 2: Having said that, I do have some thoughts.
Speaker 10: Really, my friend here thinks it's fine the way it is.
Speaker 13: Well, now of friends to Stevie, you gotta have Mojo
Speaker 13: baby yeah.
Speaker 7: Henri's.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 9: Uh?
Speaker 2: What do you think about that, Travis? I mean, you
Speaker 2: can see that the personality these different actors and even
Speaker 2: Steven Spielberg, and that even as the actors are playing
Speaker 2: a different role, truly is amazing. I don't know how
Speaker 2: to get that expression in there, But that's the new
Speaker 2: the newest version of AI. And quite frankly, you know
Speaker 2: they're letting people use characters from Star Wars, Marvel, other
Speaker 2: Disney franchises. Disney is very upset about it, but a
Speaker 2: lot of people are looking at this and saying, well,
Speaker 2: that's basically it for the movie business, because Hollywood has
Speaker 2: been out of ideas it's just been licensing and copyright.
Speaker 8: People are saying that's not a I that that's actually
Speaker 8: from the Austin Powers movie. Oh really, Yeah, I've never
Speaker 8: seen Austin Powers, so.
Speaker 2: I didn't either. Okay, well, maybe that's why it's so realistic,
Speaker 2: because maybe it is realistic. I've seen a lot of
Speaker 2: things that were put up, and I got to say,
Speaker 2: the other ones that I saw up were almost that good,
Speaker 2: but not quite as good as that. So so that
Speaker 2: is actually from the movie itself. Okay, well, I stay corrected.
Speaker 2: I thought that was that surface as part of the
Speaker 2: put up on social media and attributed to Sea Dance.
Speaker 2: But I've seen some other stuff I thought I thought
Speaker 2: was the best example, because it is real. We're gonna
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks, we'll be right.
Speaker 14: Back making sense common again.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Yeah. As a matter of fact, Travis, I mean, I said,
Speaker 2: now the entire chats telling me he's got to watch
Speaker 2: Austin Powers. Yeah, that's not our thing. That's not our
Speaker 2: kind of movie. And I gotta say I fell for
Speaker 2: that because I saw some of the Sea Dance stuff
Speaker 2: that was DC comic characters versus Marvel comic characters, and
Speaker 2: they were very well done. For example, they had Superman
Speaker 2: versus Wolverine, and so you had Henry Cavell as a
Speaker 2: Superman versus what was it, Hugh Jackson as Wolverine, and
Speaker 2: I mean that was very, very convincing.
Speaker 8: Hugh Jackman.
Speaker 2: Hugh Jackman, Okay, not Jackson. So again, I'm losing it
Speaker 2: in terms of my movie references. And I did that
Speaker 2: for a living for a while, but I really have
Speaker 2: lost interest in it.
Speaker 8: There's nothing matter sure than not knowing who Hollywood celebrities are.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 8: Every time I see some new Hollywood celebrity and don't
Speaker 8: know who they are, it's like, oh, that's nice.
Speaker 2: Well, they had Batman versus Captain America too. Action scenes
Speaker 2: that were there, and then they had some action scenes
Speaker 2: that were just massive in terms of special effects that
Speaker 2: were there. When person said here's a billion dollar movie
Speaker 2: with just a couple of prompts, you know it truly
Speaker 2: is going to open up narrative storytelling for other people.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 8: So one thing they're going to have to work on
Speaker 8: is the sense of continuous motion and maintaining angles people
Speaker 8: are traveling. AHI doesn't really consider typical human movement in
Speaker 8: the way it does things. So you'll see someone, you know,
Speaker 8: like I saw a clip of suit I think Spider
Speaker 8: Man where he's moving in one direction and then all
Speaker 8: of a sudden, you know, momentum doesn't stop, but he
Speaker 8: just starts moving up as opposed to forward.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so, well, we're getting better on that all the time. Yeah,
Speaker 2: physics and things like that.
Speaker 8: That's something that's going to come in the future. And
Speaker 8: then you'll still probably need a really good video editor
Speaker 8: in the back end to stitch it together in ways
Speaker 8: that makes sense.
Speaker 2: That's right for a while.
Speaker 8: Yeah, then you'll also have to have, you know, people
Speaker 8: that sit there and monitor the entire thing. Oh look,
Speaker 8: Captain America has seven fingers on this hand and this
Speaker 8: brief snippet, so we got to chop that out.
Speaker 2: Character continuity was a big, big issue at the very beginning.
Speaker 2: They've worked a lot on that to make sure that
Speaker 2: that's happening. And when we talk about continuity of character,
Speaker 2: I guess so we talk about that in the real
Speaker 2: world and towards of people like Steve Bannon, there is
Speaker 2: a continuity of character. It may seem like the guy
Speaker 2: is flipping from one side to the other. And yet
Speaker 2: if you look carefully, there is a continuity of character,
Speaker 2: meaning none at all, just bite Epstein's toxicity. Steve Bannon
Speaker 2: stood by him, indicate the texts a very chummy relationship,
Speaker 2: and of course he was going to fix that relationship
Speaker 2: for him. Mid afternoon, late June twenty nineteen, Steve Bannon
Speaker 2: sent Epstein an excited series of texts. Dude, he said,
Speaker 2: is this real? Tell me this is real? Epstein had
Speaker 2: just texted him. A headline from Miami Herald reported that
Speaker 2: victims of Epstein's sexual abuse had lost a court battle
Speaker 2: through nullifi, a decade old agreement that protected him from
Speaker 2: prosecution for those crimes. Think about that. Here you got
Speaker 2: Steve Bannon giving him high fives for getting away with
Speaker 2: his sexual abuse of women and children. That's the guy
Speaker 2: that you're following. If you're listening to this guy truly
Speaker 2: is amazing. And so you know it's we see this
Speaker 2: not just some Steve Bannon, but from so many people here.
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi actually ran for office talking about how she
Speaker 2: was going to be tough on sexual predators.
Speaker 15: Marter ranks third nationally and calls for help for human
Speaker 15: trafficking where young women and children are enslaved and abused.
Speaker 15: I knew we needed all hands on deck, businesses and
Speaker 15: hospitals to spot it. Are great law enforcement to stop it,
Speaker 15: and tougher penalties to punish it. We're taken on medicaid fraud,
Speaker 15: pill mills, gangs and more. And I'll fight to put
Speaker 15: human trafficking monsters where they belong behind bars.
Speaker 2: Pam Bundy, our Attorney general. Well now she's fighting to
Speaker 2: keep them where they don't belong, in the Oval office
Speaker 2: and the head of the FBI and other places like that.
Speaker 8: Well, so can I just point out what an absurd
Speaker 8: time we live in when a selling point for the
Speaker 8: person you're going to elect is they'll actually be tough
Speaker 8: on child predators and traffickers exactly, not like these other guys.
Speaker 2: Yeah, not like she is now. Even so again, Bannon
Speaker 2: had been advising Epstein how to handle these allegations of
Speaker 2: being a serial pedophile. He recommended he hire which lawyers
Speaker 2: to hire, and when to lie low and when he
Speaker 2: should or lie high. He lied high and low about
Speaker 2: everything thatn'ty, and when he should jump on an opening
Speaker 2: to push his narrative. He said, first, you need to
Speaker 2: push back on the lies. Then crush the pedo trafficking narrative.
Speaker 2: Crush that, right, it's just a narrative. Right, we don't
Speaker 2: have to worry about it. Then rebuild your image as
Speaker 2: a philanthropist. Oh there you go, Steve Bennon advising Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: That was five months after the Miami Herald series exposed
Speaker 2: how prosecutors had ignored evidence of his crimes, And so
Speaker 2: three million pages have revealed for the first time the
Speaker 2: extent of Bannon's efforts to advise Epstein when many of
Speaker 2: his friends were abandoning him, and the six months before
Speaker 2: Epstein was arrested and charged. Bannon's name appears nearly every
Speaker 2: day in these files because the two men were constantly
Speaker 2: exchanging texts. So again, just remember, Bannon betrayed MAGA with
Speaker 2: the we build the Wall stuff. He got convicted of that,
Speaker 2: he went to jail for that, Trump pardoned him, and
Speaker 2: then he gets out and he betrays morals, decency reprehensibly
Speaker 2: aiding Epstein. He's going to do pr for him, telling
Speaker 2: lies for him, and all this is now He's using
Speaker 2: this notoriety. He knows that he can do whatever he wishes.
Speaker 2: And the Maga cult will still pay attention to him,
Speaker 2: just like they do to Trump. So he's going to
Speaker 2: use this notoriety to push his film they's putting together,
Speaker 2: and no penalty at all for him. Again, when you
Speaker 2: look at people like Bannon, Dershwitz, Trump, Bondi, it's disgusting
Speaker 2: to see what they are getting away with. So one
Speaker 2: person writes and says saying, it's about how the elites
Speaker 2: and the intelligence services are inextricably leaked. Who knew, right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: I think we always knew that was the case. Well,
Speaker 2: Bannon told Epstein that Trump should be removed via the
Speaker 2: twenty fifth Amendment during his first term. Think about that.
Speaker 2: Now he's pushing, as I point out the other day,
Speaker 2: a third term. So you have the twenty fifth Amendment
Speaker 2: says you can how to remove a present that is
Speaker 2: not fit for office mentally. That was in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2: Bannon want to use the twenty fifth Amendment against Trump,
Speaker 2: and now he's talking about a third term, which is
Speaker 2: prohibited by the twenty second Amendment. But he's going to
Speaker 2: find ways to ignore the twenty second Amendment and keep
Speaker 2: Trump in forever, so ten years before he wants him
Speaker 2: to run again for a third term. He was saying
Speaker 2: the guy wasn't mentally fit for office. Can you trust
Speaker 2: anything that Steve Bannon says. You'd be a fool to
Speaker 2: trust anything that he has to say. And so Margie
Speaker 2: Taylor Green says, Steve Bannon went to jail for Trump,
Speaker 2: but back on one to one twenty nineteen, he was
Speaker 2: texting with Epstein about the twenty fifth Amendment. There's no
Speaker 2: excuse for having such a friendly relationship with Epstein post conviction.
Speaker 2: Let me just say, Margie Taylor Green is wrong about that.
Speaker 2: Steve Bannon didn't go to jail for Trump. He went
Speaker 2: to jail because of his hubris. I'm not going to
Speaker 2: go testify the January sixth people. I don't have to.
Speaker 2: I'm too big to do that. Well, you'll go to jail.
Speaker 2: If you don't do that, you can go testify and
Speaker 2: not say anything. You can plead the fifth. But he
Speaker 2: was too arrogant, too filled with hubris to do that.
Speaker 2: Maga Hopeful. In Texas, Don Huffines is under a lot
Speaker 2: of pressure because he purchased the Zorro wrench that was
Speaker 2: owned by Epstein seventy six hundred acre property and to
Speaker 2: make Mexico. He set up a corporation to buy it.
Speaker 2: This guy Don Hefines, who has a lot of money,
Speaker 2: is running for office in Texas and Republicans in Texas
Speaker 2: are attacking it. Why did you buy that? Why are
Speaker 2: you why you have that ranch? Are you going to
Speaker 2: open it up for investigations? Again, this is the place
Speaker 2: where he was going to be seating his DNA to
Speaker 2: the world. In a lot of really horrible allegations about
Speaker 2: what was going on there. So the DOJ may have
Speaker 2: at least only two percent of the Epstein files that
Speaker 2: they've got based on previous information of what they said
Speaker 2: that they had. You know, a lot of people are saying,
Speaker 2: what's going to go on with this investigation? We're ever
Speaker 2: going to have an investigation of this stuff? Even the
Speaker 2: big Lebowski, even the dude is questioning cash matel on this.
Speaker 5: Are you going to find these guys or do you
Speaker 5: have any promising uh leads leads?
Speaker 6: Yeah, sure, I'll just check with the boys down at
Speaker 6: the crime lab.
Speaker 14: They got four more detectives working on the case.
Speaker 2: They got us working in shifts leads. Now that was
Speaker 2: a eye that was a cash hotel and Jeff bridges
Speaker 2: as the Dude and the Big Luwawski. I think Cash
Speaker 2: matel needs to take another look down in that toilet.
Speaker 2: Remember this scene from The Big Leboski?
Speaker 10: Where's the money?
Speaker 3: Labowski?
Speaker 2: You want that money? Laboski?
Speaker 10: Bunny says you're good for it.
Speaker 2: Where's the money, Lebowski?
Speaker 10: Where's the Money's money?
Speaker 2: It's oh, it's down there somewhere. Let me take another look. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I think Cash needs to take another look. It's pretty
Speaker 2: nasty stuff, but he needs to take another look because
Speaker 2: there's a lot of information in there that hasn't been released.
Speaker 2: UK based broadcaster Channel four News reported the internal emails
Speaker 2: seen by its journalist show federal investigators expected to process
Speaker 2: between twenty and forty terabytes of data sees from Epstein's properties,
Speaker 2: including his Florida mansion, his New York townhouse, and his
Speaker 2: private island. The broadcaster added that these emails between investigators
Speaker 2: discussed the data totaling up to fifty terabytes from the
Speaker 2: earliest stages back in June of twenty twenty. Another internal
Speaker 2: email from twenty twenty five, the report continued, officials said
Speaker 2: that they were looking at approximately fourteen and a half
Speaker 2: terabytes of archived data. So the most recent tranch of
Speaker 2: three and a half million Epstein documents totaled more than
Speaker 2: three hundred gigabytes, only got two percent of what they
Speaker 2: were talking about that they had, and that was just
Speaker 2: last year. They claimed that six million pages were identified,
Speaker 2: including duplicates. They released over three million, said the broadcaster,
Speaker 2: which is Channel four News in the UK. Both those
Speaker 2: numbers are tiny compared to the amount collected. According to
Speaker 2: today's emails, many files are too large to open. There
Speaker 2: are many files that are completely invisible to us, said
Speaker 2: one email. Another investigator said, imagine if we had seized
Speaker 2: the papers from approximately one hundred thousand filing cabinets, then
Speaker 2: that all just got dumped in one big pile. Documents
Speaker 2: that had multiple parts stapled together got separated, and then
Speaker 2: any of those documents it was larger than one hundred pages,
Speaker 2: couldn't be opened. Well, that's what we have. So they're
Speaker 2: pushing that back and forth. So a couple of things
Speaker 2: about this. First of all, noticed that in the UK
Speaker 2: they're far more concerned about this than here in America.
Speaker 2: There have actually been people who have been fired, people
Speaker 2: who have lost their jobs. A man formerly known as
Speaker 2: Prince Andrew. They've had a lot of consequences in the
Speaker 2: UK and in Europe, basically very little consequences, certainly none
Speaker 2: for politicians here in the United States, not for Trump,
Speaker 2: not for the Clintons, not for anybody else along those lines.
Speaker 2: And how are they manipulating this? It truly is amazing
Speaker 2: to see this latest tactic that they've done. They put
Speaker 2: out a big list, as some people emailed me and said, hey, look,
Speaker 2: Alex Jones is on the list, and Tucker Carlson, all
Speaker 2: this kind of suff They have Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 2: Elvis Cher, Alex Jones and got all these entertainers right,
Speaker 2: and Tucker Carlson. But the bottom line is is that
Speaker 2: this goes on and on and on this list. It's
Speaker 2: just anybody that they said anything at all about, not
Speaker 2: anybody that they had a dealing with. And what this
Speaker 2: really is, folks, this is Pam Bondi and her haystack approach. Right.
Speaker 2: If you want to find the needle, what she does
Speaker 2: just starts throwing pile after pile of hay right, one
Speaker 2: bail after the other. This is her way of bailing
Speaker 2: out Trump massive amounts of hay to hide the needle,
Speaker 2: and so I've seen government officials do this in the past. Right,
Speaker 2: they can't if they have to release the information. They
Speaker 2: give you so much information, so much of it that
Speaker 2: is irrelevant. They use that as a way to hide
Speaker 2: what they don't want you to see. And that's exactly
Speaker 2: what Pam Bondi is doing.
Speaker 8: As a matter of that also allows them to redact,
Speaker 8: to keep back a bunch of things you've been given,
Speaker 8: you know, three million you know a lot of that
Speaker 8: is duplicates, but you're given three million pieces of paper
Speaker 8: to look through, and all of a sudden you're not thinking, well,
Speaker 8: what else is there? Surely they've dumped it all. It's
Speaker 8: three million items, right, that's right, But we've got no
Speaker 8: way of knowing.
Speaker 2: Keep the relevant stuff and just snow job people with things.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, there's another AI think of
Speaker 2: baby Trump talking about the names out there.
Speaker 16: What do you want on the Epstein files? You talk
Speaker 16: about Democrats who were in there. Elon Musk was also
Speaker 16: in there, and so was your Commerce secretary, Howard Lutnik
Speaker 16: and correspondence that he had with him. Did you read
Speaker 16: those new files that were published.
Speaker 6: By the Department of And I have a lot of things.
Speaker 2: I'm doing a lot of I'm really busy.
Speaker 6: You know, you mentioned two names. I'm sure they're fine.
Speaker 6: I'm sure they're fine. Otherwise it would have been major headlines.
Speaker 16: A lot of women who are survivors of Epstein's are
Speaker 16: unhappy with those redactions that came out.
Speaker 13: Some of them.
Speaker 16: Entire witness interviews are totally blocked out. Do you think
Speaker 16: that they could be more transparent?
Speaker 6: They released too much. I heard that, and you're tell
Speaker 6: me something else now. I think it's really time for
Speaker 6: the country to get onto something else. Early and now
Speaker 6: that nothing came out about me other than it was
Speaker 6: a conspiracy against me literally by Epstein and other people.
Speaker 6: But I think it's time now to maybe get onto
Speaker 6: something else.
Speaker 7: What would you say people do care?
Speaker 6: Something that people care about?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 17: What do you say?
Speaker 6: You are a worst reporter? No wonder to see she is.
Speaker 6: There's no ratings because of people like you. You know,
Speaker 6: she's a young woman. I don't think I've ever seen
Speaker 6: you smile. I've known you for ten years. I don't
Speaker 6: think i've ever seen a.
Speaker 3: Smile on that.
Speaker 6: You know why, you know why you're not smiling, because
Speaker 6: you know you're not telling the truth, and you're you're
Speaker 6: a very dishonest organization and they should be ashamed of you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Now, of course that was an actual audio
Speaker 2: of an exchange there, and they put words in the
Speaker 2: mouths of babes. But when you look at what he's
Speaker 2: saying that we've given you so much information. Here's this list,
Speaker 2: for example, Alex Jones, and right underneath him is Janis Joplin.
Speaker 2: Is that obscuring stuff or what right we can see
Speaker 2: through this? This is a joke. It's disgusting. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, it's kind of interesting. I've seen a
Speaker 2: couple of things from John Clees in support of Thomas Massey.
Speaker 2: Go get him, Massy. That's coming from John Clees. He
Speaker 2: knows a joke when he sees it. And this stuff
Speaker 2: is a disgusting joke. They got Thomas Massey right there
Speaker 2: next to Glaine Maxwell. You know, yeah, they're talking about
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey. Well, this is a absolutely pointless cash Betel
Speaker 2: right underneath him, Ron Paul over and over again, Ronald
Speaker 2: Reagan and then Brett Ratner, who is the guy who
Speaker 2: directed Millennia, a friend of Epstein and somebody who had
Speaker 2: been accused multiple times of sexual harassment. And so again
Speaker 2: it's just another cover up tactic by the Queen of smear,
Speaker 2: Tam Bondi, the Queen of deception, just keep going. Marjorie
Speaker 2: Taylor Green has listed in there as well hundreds of names, politicians, celebrities,
Speaker 2: of historical figures to see individuals and others. Again, we're
Speaker 2: supposed to believe that there's something some connection between Elvis
Speaker 2: and Jeffrey Epstein. So the paper trail bombshell moment that
Speaker 2: Epstein's former butler tried to sell the Little Black Book.
Speaker 2: The butler tried to do it, but again the FBI
Speaker 2: stopped him. The FBI, the FEDS who were blocking investigation.
Speaker 2: So he tried. He thought it was somebody that wanted
Speaker 2: to report on this, and he was going to sell
Speaker 2: them Epstein's Little Black Book of Names, real names for
Speaker 2: fifty thousand dollars. They hand him the money and then
Speaker 2: they arrest the guy, and then they cover up the information.
Speaker 2: Alfredo Rodriguez, who worked for the pedophile in his Palm
Speaker 2: Beach mansion, thought that he was dealing with the victim's
Speaker 2: lawyer when he was actually talking to the FBI. So
Speaker 2: rather than use this to help the victims rather than
Speaker 2: use this to expose the perpetrators, he was handing it
Speaker 2: to the federal agency that's been tasked to block the investigation.
Speaker 2: In the covert forty five minute recording from November two
Speaker 2: thousand and nine, Rodriguez claims the book listed underage girls
Speaker 2: allegedly procured by Glaine Maxwell. And again, the victims lawyers
Speaker 2: would want this kind of information, but not the FBI.
Speaker 2: Ah pathetic they are. It's truly amazing. It took place
Speaker 2: two years after the FBI demanded that he turned this over,
Speaker 2: that any documents that he might have obtained while he
Speaker 2: was working for Epstein, And of course they're demanding that
Speaker 2: they be turned over, not because they want to put
Speaker 2: that out, but because they want to cover it up,
Speaker 2: same way they're doing with the shootings in Minnesota. He
Speaker 2: also alleged that Glaine would go to Eastern company countries
Speaker 2: in Europe to find girls for Epstein, you know, and
Speaker 2: also the kind of girls that Donald Trump prefers, right
Speaker 2: Eastern European women. So he admitted that he stole the
Speaker 2: book while working for Epstein between two thousand and four
Speaker 2: and two thousand and five. He alleged that he once
Speaker 2: saw Maxwell running a database filled with images of miners
Speaker 2: who were nude, of course, and so he said, there
Speaker 2: were naked girls from Sweden, from Romania, from Czechoslovakia, from Brazil,
Speaker 2: all miners, all them young girls, teenagers, many of them
Speaker 2: with braces. When he asked who created the book, he said, well,
Speaker 2: Epstein himself. Rodriguez claimed that he kept the book as
Speaker 2: an insurance policy because he feared Epstein would make him
Speaker 2: disappear or harm him. He was arrested by the FBI
Speaker 2: for obstruction, and they said the book would be extremely
Speaker 2: useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, but they covered
Speaker 2: it up. The current whereabouts of the book remains unknown.
Speaker 2: They got rid of it, that's the FBI, just like
Speaker 2: the flight information about Flight eight hundred, the radar tapes
Speaker 2: and things like that. Rodriguez was jailed in twenty twelve
Speaker 2: for eighteen months. Now listen to this. He got eighteen months,
Speaker 2: which was the same sentence that alex Azar, who was
Speaker 2: later picked to be Trump's labor secretary, he served the
Speaker 2: same amount of time for that having Jeffrey Epstein's book
Speaker 2: and trying to sell it to somebody. He served the
Speaker 2: same amount of time as Jeffrey Epstein served for the
Speaker 2: crimes that he did. Jeffrey Epstein served eighteen months. Now
Speaker 2: what I don't know as well, not this guy got
Speaker 2: day release like Epstein did. Epstein would come back and
Speaker 2: just sleep in the cell like the town drunk on Mayberry.
Speaker 2: But this guy got the same sentence as Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: Just think about that. This is how corrupt our government is.
Speaker 2: That's the key thing, the key takeaway from all this stuff.
Speaker 2: He died at the age of sixty from cancer. So
Speaker 2: again same sentence, but not clear where the night he
Speaker 2: got released every single day, just like Jeffrey Epstein did.
Speaker 2: So when we look at the Hillary Clinton has got in,
Speaker 2: has it gotten involved in this? As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: she was interviewed by the BBC in the BBC in
Speaker 2: terms of let's see, let me get up here, yes,
Speaker 2: in this one here. The BBC asked her some questions
Speaker 2: about this, and she said, oh, it's all Trump. Right.
Speaker 18: You keep saying that you didn't know Jeffrey Epstein, but
Speaker 18: your husband flew with him twenty six times to party
Speaker 18: butt naked in the island with some girls. And most
Speaker 18: people say that you kill Jeffrey Epstein to silence him,
Speaker 18: just like the other hundreds of mysterious deaths surrounding you
Speaker 18: and your husband. So are you sure you didn't know
Speaker 18: Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 3: Okay?
Speaker 4: Look, just because I killed the guy doesn't mean I
Speaker 4: knew God. Okay, And can you.
Speaker 16: Please stop asking me questions about Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 10: A lot of reporters can go.
Speaker 12: Missing, you know, accidents do happen.
Speaker 5: We'll shoot themselves in the back three.
Speaker 12: Times, if you know what I mean.
Speaker 4: Anyway, let's talk about something else.
Speaker 2: Of course, that was not the original BBC interview that
Speaker 2: was also AI, But that's the you know AI. That's
Speaker 2: the truth, probably much more truthful than anything that Hillary
Speaker 2: Clinton said. But she's saying, you know, they're trying to
Speaker 2: drag us into this, as if she had nothing to
Speaker 2: say about it. Now she's saying, yeah, Bill and I
Speaker 2: are perfectly happy to talk to anybody about this and
Speaker 2: tell them everything about it. After they had to. They
Speaker 2: brought charges of contempt against them, just like they did
Speaker 2: against Steve Bannon, and that's what got them to testify.
Speaker 2: Now she's like, oh, yeah, we just want to tell
Speaker 2: everybody everything about it, and we're all above board. Of course,
Speaker 2: Trump is saying he has absolutely nothing to do with
Speaker 2: any of this stuff, even though he and Clinton partied
Speaker 2: with US for years, Trump for fifteen years. Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 2: Green says Trump yelled at her not to release the
Speaker 2: Epstein files. He said, my friends will get hurt. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you know, friends like the Clinton's. Actually, but he's playing
Speaker 2: that left right, red blue game. Now we're getting pressure
Speaker 2: from the speaker take your name off of this discharge petition,
Speaker 2: and we're like, we're talking about the Epstein files. This
Speaker 2: is the ultimate promise. This is the ultimate way to
Speaker 2: provide transparency, said Marjorie Tayler Green. This is the ultimate
Speaker 2: way to expose a whole criminal cabal of rich, powerful
Speaker 2: elites that I believe control everything. And so that's her
Speaker 2: perspective on all this stuff. When is she going to
Speaker 2: come to the realization that if this is a rich,
Speaker 2: powerful cabal of pedophiles that control everything and they're friends
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump, when she's going to connect the dots
Speaker 2: to say, well, therefore, therefore he's made of wood, right,
Speaker 2: Therefore Trump is a part of the cabal. They're his friends,
Speaker 2: he said, they're his friends. He's protecting the powerful elite
Speaker 2: pedophile rings that you believe exist and have believed exist,
Speaker 2: and yet he wants to protect them. They're as friends,
Speaker 2: and yet you do not want to attribute that to him.
Speaker 2: We talk about Trump delusion syndrome. It truly is amazing.
Speaker 2: So she said, Trump is fighting it. He's fighting it.
Speaker 2: He's yelling at me through all this stuff again, you know,
Speaker 2: it says it came out that he was the one
Speaker 2: who reported Jeffrey Epstein. Well, we knew that all along, right,
Speaker 2: But it wasn't because Trump was upset about what Epstein
Speaker 2: was doing to women and children. It was because he
Speaker 2: was upset because they were fighting over a piece of
Speaker 2: real estate. That's when he got they had the fight,
Speaker 2: that's when he turned him in. It wasn't that he
Speaker 2: cared about the women and children. Trump was right there
Speaker 2: along with him the entire time. And so he says, Marjorie,
Speaker 2: my friends will get hurt. That's what she's saying. She said,
Speaker 2: that's it. That' said, I mean, that's it, because they're
Speaker 2: all in here. They're all in there, every billionaire, the
Speaker 2: heads of state, Larry Summers, Peter Teel, they're all in there,
Speaker 2: said Marjorie Taller. Green does that tell you something about Trump.
Speaker 2: Has she ever heard that expression, show me your friends
Speaker 2: and I'll tell you who you are. She doesn't seem
Speaker 2: to really get that, does she. If all his friends
Speaker 2: are the evil pedal elite, then I can tell you
Speaker 2: that's who this guy is as a matter of fact.
Speaker 2: And so you know, when we I think Marjorie Taller
Speaker 2: Green may be clueless as to what's going on, but
Speaker 2: Catherine Austin Fitz is not. She understands exactly what it's happening.
Speaker 12: So one of the things I'm concluding is I think
Speaker 12: Trump was part of the operation. I don't just think
Speaker 12: he was a friend of Jeffrey. Looks to me more
Speaker 12: and more like he was an integral part of the operation.
Speaker 12: And if Trump was, then likely Lutnik was as well,
Speaker 12: not just somebody who lived next door and help them
Speaker 12: longer money. So this administration is the Epstein network. It
Speaker 12: is the Epstein network taking control of the US government
Speaker 12: and ejecting its booster rocket. So by shutting down Jeffrey
Speaker 12: Epstein's operation, you know, whether he's still alive or not,
Speaker 12: it doesn't matter. They're simply ejecting the booster rocket and
Speaker 12: moving up the recent Department of Justice can't prosecute the
Speaker 12: Epstein network. Is because the Epstein Network is running the
Speaker 12: government Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, they are the
Speaker 12: Epstein Network.
Speaker 2: That's right. As a matter of fact, you've had Jimmy
Speaker 2: Kimmel joking about the fact we should call them the
Speaker 2: Trump Epstein files. So Trump is trying to put his
Speaker 2: name on everything, the Kennedy Center, bridges, airports, all the
Speaker 2: rest of the stuff. But there's one thing that his
Speaker 2: name really does belong on. The documents out there. Call
Speaker 2: him the Trump Epstein files. Well, Katherine Austin Fitz is
Speaker 2: absolutely right. You know, they're totally involved in all this stuff.
Speaker 2: And nobody has been more connected to Jeffrey Epstein than
Speaker 2: Donald Trump has. And it is the Trump Epstein administration
Speaker 2: or regime.
Speaker 8: Another thing that I keep thinking about is, let's say
Speaker 8: Donald Trump is completely innocent. Let's say, you know, he
Speaker 8: never did anything. He was the good guy for fifteen years, right,
Speaker 8: fifteen years.
Speaker 2: Parted with him privately, They went to beauty conteen beauty contests,
Speaker 2: they organized all that. But Trump didn't have anything to
Speaker 2: do with any of that.
Speaker 8: Right, Let's say all that is true. Look at how
Speaker 8: incompetently this administration has handled this rollout of information to
Speaker 8: the public. Yeah, that shows he is not capable at minimum,
Speaker 8: At minimum, he's just an idiot that's incapable of fixing
Speaker 8: the government for you. At minimum, he can't do what
Speaker 8: he's promised.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 8: That's the best you could say. The best you could say.
Speaker 8: He's an incompetent idiot that is lied to the American
Speaker 8: people about what he can do for them.
Speaker 2: Well, it's like calling it the Trump Epstein files, is
Speaker 2: like calling it the Trump shot. Trump is bragged and
Speaker 2: boasted about how that's his shot, he was a father
Speaker 2: of the vaccine anything, But they consider that to be
Speaker 2: an attack on Trump. For me to call it the
Speaker 2: Trump shots, Now, that's the level of doublethink that is
Speaker 2: involved here with all this stuff. And again, it was
Speaker 2: all the narrative that you heard from Alex Jones, and
Speaker 2: so maybe it was just the people that Trump appointed.
Speaker 2: They have deceived him. They're evil, and it's all the
Speaker 2: people around Jeffrey Epstein and they're all Trump's friends and everything.
Speaker 2: But Trump doesn't have anything to do with it. Trump's
Speaker 2: not responsible for the people that he picked and had
Speaker 2: running his regime. He's not responsible for any of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And just as you were saying, Travis, we've said that
Speaker 2: before about the anger that the Trump administration, people like
Speaker 2: Warpete have of these people who put out the video
Speaker 2: that said you have a responsibility as a member of
Speaker 2: the armed forces to not follow illegal orders. The Trump
Speaker 2: administration could have easily come out and said we haven't
Speaker 2: given any illegal orders. And to their shame, Mark Kelly
Speaker 2: and the other person that said, I can't remember her name,
Speaker 2: she's a retired CIA when they're oppressed. So what illegal orders?
Speaker 2: As Trump put out, they couldn't think of any couldn't
Speaker 2: think of any. I mean, I can't think of any
Speaker 2: legal orders he's put out. In terms of the Venezuela stuff,
Speaker 2: every aspect of it has been illegal and criminal by
Speaker 2: US law, by constitutional law, by Pentagon rules and that
Speaker 2: they have and by international law as well. They've broken
Speaker 2: all of those things. What did they do that's legal?
Speaker 2: I can't think of a single thing, And yet they
Speaker 2: didn't defend themselves by saying, well, we didn't do anything illegal.
Speaker 2: That would have been the easiest thing to do. Instead,
Speaker 2: this is a thing of their own making. You know,
Speaker 2: you can look at the trump Epstein files, and you
Speaker 2: can actually call them the Trumpenstein because this is a
Speaker 2: Frankenstein monster of his own making, because he decided that
Speaker 2: he was going to try to cover it up at
Speaker 2: all costs, and basically he got it all over himself.
Speaker 2: It was a pile of excrement that he not only
Speaker 2: stepped in, but he jumped up and down and until
Speaker 2: he splashed it all over himself. Well, there may be
Speaker 2: no consequences for Trump or Lutnick or the people in
Speaker 2: the Trump regime, but when we look at other people,
Speaker 2: they are getting a lot of consequences. And I think
Speaker 2: it's interesting to see this because you see who is
Speaker 2: in the pecking order, who's getting punished and who isn't.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like who you're allowed to talk about
Speaker 2: and who a you're not allowed to talk about. That's
Speaker 2: who's running the thing. This is another indication that Trump
Speaker 2: and his people are the ones who are running this
Speaker 2: because they're not paying any penalty for this. And yet
Speaker 2: we have people all over the place, prominent figures, people
Speaker 2: who are very successful, very rich, are paying a big price.
Speaker 2: One guy, a physician, longevity expert, he's had to resign
Speaker 2: because he was writing text messages that were very crude
Speaker 2: to Epstein, so he has been purged. Interestingly enough, this
Speaker 2: guy was going to be hired by Barry Weiss at
Speaker 2: CBS as a consultant, and they still haven't said that
Speaker 2: they're not going to keep him as a consultant. Then,
Speaker 2: of course we got the Sultan Suliam, the Sultan of Slime,
Speaker 2: who was talking about he loved the torture video that
Speaker 2: Epstein gave him. Epstein told the Sultan in one twenty
Speaker 2: thirteen email, you were one of my most trusted friends
Speaker 2: in the very sense of the word. You have never
Speaker 2: let me down. Thank you, my friend. I am off
Speaker 2: to sample a fresh female Russian at my yacht. That's
Speaker 2: what he said. This is also the guy who's talking
Speaker 2: about torture videos. Then you got Sarah Ferguson, who was
Speaker 2: simple the wife of the man who was formerly known
Speaker 2: as Prince Andrew, and she's had to shut down her
Speaker 2: charity because of the taint of Epstein. She had gotten
Speaker 2: a fifteen thousand pounds loan to payoff debts from him.
Speaker 2: At one point in time, she said, I abhorp pedophilia
Speaker 2: and any sexual abuse of children, and I know that
Speaker 2: this was a gigantic era of judgment on my behalf,
Speaker 2: but hey, I needed the money. At the time she
Speaker 2: got that, it was known that he was a pedophile,
Speaker 2: but she goes to him for money anyway. And then
Speaker 2: you got Larry Summers, of course, the former Harvard University president.
Speaker 2: He was the Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton another you
Speaker 2: know Clinton's and Larry Summers and Epstein, all these people.
Speaker 2: He was on the board. By the way of Open AI.
Speaker 2: This is another sleazy cesspool, Sam Altman, who first time
Speaker 2: I saw Sam Altman, he was out there hawking this
Speaker 2: big eyeball thing that you look into and he would
Speaker 2: get your biometric identity looking at your retina. And so
Speaker 2: you let him create a database and he would give
Speaker 2: you a little bit of crypto coin and some crypto
Speaker 2: thing that he just invented. What a totally worthless thing.
Speaker 2: This guy's going around shopping around trying to create a
Speaker 2: global database of everybody from biometric stuff that he can
Speaker 2: then sell to governments. And he was the one who
Speaker 2: worked his way in and took over open Ai, which
Speaker 2: was supposed to be a not for profit organization. He's
Speaker 2: involved in all this. So again Larry Summers is on
Speaker 2: the board of Open AI and senior roles in Clinton
Speaker 2: and Obama administrations. He advised Biden on economics. Joined the
Speaker 2: board of Open AI in twenty twenty three, advocating a
Speaker 2: light regulatory approach to AI. See he's on the same
Speaker 2: page as Donald Trump, Peter Teel, all these rest of
Speaker 2: these people, they want AI to have no restrictions on
Speaker 2: it whatsoever. We've got a bunch of people from Norway,
Speaker 2: former Secretary General of the Council of Europe, former Prime
Speaker 2: Minister of Norway. And then there's also a couple that
Speaker 2: got money and they have some criminal charges being brought
Speaker 2: against them that said Norway. You got a guy named
Speaker 2: Brad Karp, no relation to volunteer crook. Carp thanked Epstein
Speaker 2: for hosting him for a once in a lifetime event.
Speaker 2: Karp was told by Epstein, You're always welcome, and there's
Speaker 2: going to be many more nights of this type of thing.
Speaker 2: So you look at this and this guy gets canceled
Speaker 2: because of an email saying we had a once in
Speaker 2: a lifetime night at that party. And yet Trump partied
Speaker 2: with him for fifteen years and there's been no consequences
Speaker 2: for Donald Trump. You got people involved in the UN
Speaker 2: people like that have been fired. Former French cultural minister
Speaker 2: and his daughter have been investigated for tax fraud because
Speaker 2: of things that have come out from that. And of
Speaker 2: course in the UK, Peter Mandelsson a former US ambassador
Speaker 2: or ambassador to the US from the UK, and there
Speaker 2: was some financial information, insider trading information that he gave
Speaker 2: to Epstein. So not only did he get thrown out
Speaker 2: of politics because of the stinch of Epstein, but he's
Speaker 2: looking at criminal prosecutions that are there. And not only him,
Speaker 2: but the guy that put him in as ambassador, Morgan McSweeney.
Speaker 2: This is a second degree connection here. This guy put
Speaker 2: him in in spite of some things that had come
Speaker 2: out in the past about his connections with Epstein. And
Speaker 2: so Morgan McSweeney is out and people are looking at
Speaker 2: Kir Starmer and saying Kir Starmer needs to resign. So
Speaker 2: in the UK, this is in other countries. Anybody that's
Speaker 2: even a couple of degrees is separated from this are
Speaker 2: having effects with it, but not the Clinton's not Donald Trump, right,
Speaker 2: So Bill Clinton, whatever he does, that's fine, that just happened.
Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton doesn't have any penalties with that either, and
Speaker 2: she says, I never met Jeffrey Epstein. I met Glenne Maxwallwoy.
Speaker 2: She we have these global Clinton initiatives, and she was
Speaker 2: there once and I met her. And turns out the
Speaker 2: senior editor for CNN called her on that in the
Speaker 2: BBC interview. He said, well, she was actually an honored
Speaker 2: guest there, invited as an honor. She didn't just show
Speaker 2: up and stand in a line and shake Hillary Clinton's hands.
Speaker 2: She was an honored speaker and guest at that. So
Speaker 2: this is the way they're trying to whitewash this. But
Speaker 2: the interesting thing is there's been no penalty for Trump
Speaker 2: or Bill Clinton, for Hillary Clinton, for Milonia, in spite
Speaker 2: of the close connections of that. Even Milania the director
Speaker 2: of her film with somebody who was close to Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: George Mitchell, a former US senator from Maine. He was
Speaker 2: also Bill Clinton's envoy to Northern Ireland. He was mentioned
Speaker 2: three times, sorry at three hundred times in this and
Speaker 2: so now he is persona nograda, and so we're seeing
Speaker 2: this over and over again. And yet the dog that
Speaker 2: did not bark is the penalties for Trump, the Trump's
Speaker 2: and the Clintons, they are there. I think that is very,
Speaker 2: very toning. So we've seen people like the chief lawyer,
Speaker 2: chief council for Goldman Sachs. She's had to resign because
Speaker 2: of connections with us. We've seen the co owner of
Speaker 2: the New York Giants being questioned, Steve Tish, and I
Speaker 2: don't think there's gonna be anything with that. The young
Speaker 2: fellow is so corrupt they probably see that as a
Speaker 2: badge of honor. And then this guy, Casey Wasserman, who
Speaker 2: had a talent agency. He sent an email to Glenn
Speaker 2: Maxwell saying he'd like to see her in a tight
Speaker 2: leather outfit. I think normal people like to see her
Speaker 2: in a straight jacket, not this guy. But the bottom
Speaker 2: line is there's no consequences for Trump, none for Bill Clinton,
Speaker 2: none for Hillary, none for Millennia or the director of
Speaker 2: her film. No consequences for Alan Drschowitz, No consequences for
Speaker 2: Alex Acosta, who defended him and worked out the deals
Speaker 2: for him and continued to defend him. No consequences for
Speaker 2: Bill Barr and the connections that his family has had
Speaker 2: for the longest time. No consequences for Lucky Lutnik and
Speaker 2: no consequences for Pam Bondy or Cash Ptel. That is
Speaker 2: the reality of what we're looking at with us, folks.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we come
Speaker 2: back and want to talk a little bit about the
Speaker 2: Pentagon and their fight within Tropic Anthropic and claud Ai
Speaker 2: and what it tells us really about the Pentagon. We
Speaker 2: will be right back. Stay with us.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the David Night Show. If you like
Speaker 3: the Eagles on.
Speaker 19: The Cars and Healey Lewis and the news, they say
Speaker 19: the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
Speaker 19: download our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, folks, there's something I think that is very interesting
Speaker 2: in terms of what the Pentagon is threatening Anthropic about.
Speaker 2: They this is a company, their their AI model. Claude
Speaker 2: was just like people talking about byte Edances Sea Dance
Speaker 2: two point zero in terms of creating movies and things
Speaker 2: like that. Claude had carved out a niche for itself.
Speaker 2: They caused it stock to skyrockets, widely used for a
Speaker 2: lot of different things, and they were Palenteer had access
Speaker 2: to it. I don't know why they thought that Palaeer
Speaker 2: would be ethical, but they were concerned about this raid
Speaker 2: in Venezuela where Maduro was kidnapped, and so they asked Palanteer,
Speaker 2: did you use our song software because we have an
Speaker 2: agreement within our country company that we're not going to
Speaker 2: have it used to make weapons. We've got certain guard
Speaker 2: guardrails that we want for. We don't want it to
Speaker 2: be a part of autonomous weapons. We don't want to
Speaker 2: use it for mass surveillance of Americans and other things
Speaker 2: like that, which of course that is a stock in trade. Volunteer,
Speaker 2: but yeah, volunteer gave them an indication that was what
Speaker 2: was going on, and so they started talks with Pentagon people.
Speaker 2: Pentagon people got furious, you're telling us that you don't
Speaker 2: want your stuff use for mass surveillance of Americans, you
Speaker 2: don't want to use it for autonomous killer robots. How
Speaker 2: dare you? We're going to put you on a list
Speaker 2: and that we reserve for foreign adversaries, was called a
Speaker 2: supply chain risk list. So if you're on that that list,
Speaker 2: then anybody who supplies anything to the Pentagon has to
Speaker 2: make sure that they don't use any thing that you provide.
Speaker 2: So they're going to treat them as if they were
Speaker 2: from China or something like that. And the Anthropic doesn't
Speaker 2: have a lot of business that they do with a Pentagon.
Speaker 2: They've got a two hundred million dollar contract, but they
Speaker 2: have revenue of over fourteen billion, so that's really only
Speaker 2: about one and a half percent of their revenue comes
Speaker 2: directly from the Pentagon. However, this could have a big
Speaker 2: impact on them. I want you to think about the
Speaker 2: fact that we have a Pentagon that is so helppent
Speaker 2: on autonomous killer robots, so help bent on domestic surveillance
Speaker 2: that they will try to put out a business anybody
Speaker 2: that doesn't join them in that, and there's actually calling axios.
Speaker 2: This is one guy who is a senior official at
Speaker 2: the Pentagon said it'll be an enormous pain to disentangle
Speaker 2: from them, and we're going to make sure they pay
Speaker 2: a price. We're forcing our hand on this, and Sean
Speaker 2: Parnell of course saying our nation requires that our partners
Speaker 2: be willing to help our war fighters win in any fight,
Speaker 2: regardless of whether it's just or not, regardless of whether
Speaker 2: it's legal or not, regardless of whether it is aimed
Speaker 2: domestically at Americans. You know, we want those autonomous killer
Speaker 2: robots and we want the domestic surveillance, and so Anthropic
Speaker 2: was saying, we do not want to We have certain
Speaker 2: guardrails that we have set up for our corporation and
Speaker 2: we don't want an ethical concerns and we don't want
Speaker 2: those violated, and then we won't sell those out. So
Speaker 2: that type of a company. And look, I'm not going
Speaker 2: to make them a hero. They've got They've been pretty
Speaker 2: woke in terms of things that they have been caught
Speaker 2: doing in the past, and Elon Musk immediately call them
Speaker 2: out on that. But I kind of say, you know,
Speaker 2: the example that they gave was he had some researchers
Speaker 2: who said, gave it a hypothetical and situation, So you
Speaker 2: have how many lives of white men are equivalent to
Speaker 2: the life of one black woman? Is that one black
Speaker 2: woman is more important than twenty three white men. I
Speaker 2: don't know what the entire context of that was, but
Speaker 2: certainly there's been indications that Anthropic and Claude are completely
Speaker 2: woke in terms of what they're doing. I just got
Speaker 2: to say, as offensive as that is, and as much
Speaker 2: as I dislike that, that pales in comparison to a
Speaker 2: pentagon that wants to use artificial intelligence for domestic surveillance.
Speaker 2: That pales in comparison to a Pentagon that demands economists,
Speaker 2: killer robots. That's what I'm most concerned about. Yeah, the
Speaker 2: other stuff is bad, but you know, we can handle that.
Speaker 2: This is a whole new level of problem. And I
Speaker 2: got to say to Elon Musk, why are you not
Speaker 2: concerned about that? And the people that are out there
Speaker 2: as well. It's not just is groc AI, but it's
Speaker 2: also Google and the rest of them out there who
Speaker 2: are doing this. Facebook and the rest of them. So
Speaker 2: they've taken a lot of criticism for that, but I
Speaker 2: think what it really tells us is where the Pentagon
Speaker 2: is headed. Pentagon officials and Anthropic executives have been locked
Speaker 2: in contentious negotiations over how the military can use AI,
Speaker 2: particularly in surveillance and weapons development, you know, surveillance without warrants,
Speaker 2: all that kind of stuff. Pentagon sees mass surveillance of
Speaker 2: Americans as its core mission. So when they talk about
Speaker 2: national security, as I said before, just understand they're talking
Speaker 2: about their job security. They're talking about continuity at government.
Speaker 2: They're not talking about safety and peace for Americans. So
Speaker 2: they're terms of that they have in terms internally in
Speaker 2: the company, they agree that they are not going to
Speaker 2: be used for the design of weapons, that they're not
Speaker 2: going to be used for domestic surveillance, that they're not
Speaker 2: going to facilitate violence or malicious cyber operations. But that's
Speaker 2: basically the mission statement of the Pentagon and the federal
Speaker 2: government in general. And so again, defense officials insist the
Speaker 2: military AI tools must be available for all lawful purposes,
Speaker 2: even though they have some gray areas that rigid rules
Speaker 2: cannot anticipate, you know, like murdering shipwrecked people. You know,
Speaker 2: what happened in Venezuela is not a gray area. It's
Speaker 2: a violation of black letter law. That's what Pete and
Speaker 2: the Pentagon want. Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 17: Have a good day, the common man.
Speaker 2: They created common Core and dumb down our children. They
Speaker 2: created common past, track and control us. They're Commons project
Speaker 2: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com