Speaker 1: Welcome back. Before we dig deeper, it's worth remembering that
the sweet potato story isn't just about a tasty root vegetable.
It forces us to reconsider what we think we know
about ancient civilizations and their interactions. Who knows what other
accepted truths might be overturned as we continue to uncover
new evidence.
Speaker 2: It's like we're peeling back layers of history, revealing a
more intricate and interconnected past than we ever imagined, and
this interconnectedness might hold the key to unlocking many mysteries,
including the possibility of giants.
Speaker 1: It raises the question, if we were wrong about the
isolation of ancient cultures, what else might we have misjudged.
Could evidence of giants have been overlooked or dismissed because
it didn't fit the prevailing narrative.
Speaker 2: That's a thought provoking point. It makes you wonder if
our understanding of human history is like a puzzle with
missing pieces, and those missing pieces might hold the answers
to some of our biggest questions. Speaking of missing pieces,
let's revisit some of the specific cases of giant skeletons
found in America. It's important to ground our discussion in the.
Speaker 1: Details agreed, let's focus on the Midwest, a region that
seems to be a hot spot for these giant skeleton discoveries.
We've already touched upon the Miamisburg Mound in Ohio, but
there are many more intriguing reports from that state. For example,
in eighteen ninety four, The New York Times published an
article about a farmer in Ohio who discovered several ancient
graves containing skeletons upwards of six feet There was.
Speaker 2: Significantly taller than the average height for men in the
late nineteenth century, which was around five foot seven, and
the article specifically mentions that one of the skeletons was
equally large, suggesting that these weren't just isolated cases of
unusually tall individuals. It seems like there was something more
to it.
Speaker 1: Indeed, and in eighteen ninety seven, the Worthington Advance and
Iowa Newspaper reported on the Smithsonian Institution's work on the
Eastern Mounds. They quoted John Wesley Powell, the director of
the Bureau of Ethnology, as saying that scientists had unearthed
the skeleton of a giant who, based on measurements, must
have been seven feet six inches tall.
Speaker 2: Wow, seven feet six inches. That's well above the average
height even by today's dance. And what's fascinating is that
the article mentions the bones crumbling to dust when exposed
to air, adding another layer of mystery to the story.
Speaker 1: This fragility of the giant skeletons is a recurring theme
in these accounts. It makes you wonder about the conditions
of their burial, the composition of their bones, and whether
there's a scientific explanation for their rapid disintegration.
Speaker 2: It's almost as if they were from a different time,
a different era, when the very laws of nature might
have been different. But let's stick to the evidence for now.
Another compelling case comes from Steelville, Missouri, where in nineteen
thirty three, the Steelville Ledger reported the discovery of an
eight foot skeleton.
Speaker 1: And this wasn't just a fleeting mention in a local newspaper.
The article describes how the skeleton was brought to a
doctor Arc Parker and put on public display in his office.
Speaker 2: Public display that suggests a level of confidence in the
authenticity of the find. It also makes you wonder what
happened to the skeleton afterward? Did it end up in
a museum. Was it studded by scientists or did it
simply vanish like so many other giant skeletons seem to do.
Speaker 1: It's a question that often goes unanswered in these accounts,
but the fact that it was put on public display
suggests that this wasn't just a local legend or a
fabricated story. It was a tangible discovery that captured the
attention of the community. And these reports of giant skeletons
extend beyond the Midwest. We have accounts from the East Coast,
the West Coast, and even the Channel Islands off the
coast of California.
Speaker 2: One of the most striking cases comes from San Diego, California,
where in eighteen ninety five, a giant skeleton measure of
eight feet four inches was discovered. And here's the kicker.
The skeleton was examined by a Smithsonian anthropologist.
Speaker 1: A Smithsonian anthropologist that adds a layer of credibility to
the find, suggesting it warranted the attention of a respected
scientific institution. Yet the details remained shrouded in mystery. What
happened to the skeleton? Was it documented, was it studied?
And if so, why haven't those findings been made public.
Speaker 2: It's almost as if there's a deliberate effort to keep
these discoveries under wraps, to protect a narrative that doesn't
allow for the possibility of giants.
Speaker 1: It's a reminder that history is often written by the victors,
by those in positions of power, and those in power
might not always be interested in revealing truths that challenge
their authority or worldview.
Speaker 2: So where does that leave us. We have numerous accounts
of giant skeletons, some quite detailed and seemingly credible, yet
the physical evidence seems to have vanished. It's like trying
to solve a mystery where the most crucial clues have
been deliberately removed. Do you think there's a genuine effort
to suppress this information or always simply chasing shadows.
Speaker 1: It's a difficult question to answer definitively. There's a possibility
that some of these accounts are exaggerated or fabricated, while
others might hold a grain of truth that has been
distorted or suppressed over time. It's a delicate balance between
skepticism and open mindedness. We need to be critical of
the information we encounter, but also willing to entertain the
possibility that our understanding the past might be incomplete, even flawed.
Speaker 2: It's like we're walking a tight rope between believing everything
we hear and dismissing everything that challenges our existing beliefs.
But isn't that what makes us topics so fascinating. It
forces us to confront the limits of our knowledge and
the possibility that there's so much more to discover.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, it challenges us to think critically, to question assumptions,
and to be open to new possibilities. And perhaps in
that pursuit of knowledge and understanding, we might stumble upon
something truly groundbreaking, something that will forever change our perception
of who we are and where we come from.
Speaker 2: That's a captivating thought and one that will stay with
us as we continue our deep dive into the world
of giants. But before we get lost in speculation, let's
take a moment to ground ourselves in the evidence and
explore some of the scientific arguments for and against the
existence of giant humans. We'll delve into that and more
in the final part of our exploration. Welcome back to
our final segment on this deep dive into the giants
of America.
Speaker 1: We've covered a lot of ground, haven't we. From legends
and archaeological findings to whispers of cover ups and the
challenges to conventional historical narratives.
Speaker 2: It's been a whirlwind of information and speculation. But before
we wrap up, let's dive into the science behind the
possibility of giant humans. Could such beings have actually existed?
Or are they purely a product of our imagination?
Speaker 1: That's the million dollar question, isn't it? From a purely
biomechanical perspective, the square cube law presents a significant obstacle.
Speaker 2: We touched on this earlier, but for our listeners who
might have missed it, can you explain what the square
cube law is? Again?
Speaker 1: Sure?
Speaker 2: So?
Speaker 1: The square cube law essentially states that as an object
grows larger, its volume increases much faster than its surface area.
Think of it like this. Imagine a cube that's one
inch on each side, Its surface area is six square inches,
and its volume is one cubic inch. Now double the
size of the cube to two inches on each side.
The surface area becomes twenty four square inches, while the
volume jumps to eight cubic inches.
Speaker 2: So the volume increases much more dramatically than the surface area.
And how does this relate to giant humans.
Speaker 1: Well, if a human were to grow to an enormous size,
their bones would have to support a much greater volume
in w weight relative to their surface areas.
Speaker 2: So their bones would need to be incredibly strong and
dense just to support their.
Speaker 1: Own weight, right exactly, And that's where the challenge lies.
The bones of modern humans, while strong, are not designed
to handle such massive increases in size and weight.
Speaker 2: So, according to the square Acue law, giant humans would
be structurally impossible.
Speaker 1: Not necessarily impossible, but highly improbable. Their bones would have
to be significantly different from ours, perhaps much thicker, denser,
and composed of different materials.
Speaker 2: And haven't there been reports describing the bones of giant
skeletons as being unusually thick and dense.
Speaker 1: There have been such reports, but we need to approach
them with a healthy dose of skepticism. Remember, many of
these accounts come from historical sources, where accuracy and reliability
can be questionable.
Speaker 2: Of course, we have to consider the possibility of exaggerations, misinterpretations,
and even outright hoaxes. It's like trying to sift through
layers of sediment to find a few grains of truth.
Speaker 1: Precisely, and that's the challenge with this topic. Separating fact
from fiction is no easy task. But despite the scientific hurdles,
the idea of giant humans continues to capture our imaginations.
Speaker 2: Perhaps it's because deep down we yearn for a world
that's more mysterious and wondrous than what we currently perceive.
A world where giants might have roamed the earth, leaving
behind tantalizing clues of their existence.
Speaker 1: It's a romantic notion, isn't it a world where our
understanding of history and biology is constantly being challenged by
new discoveries.
Speaker 2: It's a reminder that we don't have all the answers
and that there's still so much to learn and explore.
And perhaps that's the biggest takeaway from our deep dive
into the Giants of America.
Speaker 1: It's a call to embrace curiosity, to question assumptions, and
to remain open to the possibility that our current understanding
of the world might be incomplete, whether or.
Speaker 2: Not giants truly walked among us. The journey of exploring
this topic has been a fascinating one. It's pushed us
to consider alternative perspectives, to examine evidence, critically and to
acknowledge that there's always more to learn.
Speaker 1: And that's the beauty of knowledge and exploration, isn't it.
It's a journey without a final destination, a constant pursuit
of understanding and meaning.
Speaker 2: So as we conclude our deep dive, I encourage you
to continue exploring, questioning, and challenging the narratives that shape
our perception of the world, because who knows what other
mysteries and wonders await us just beneath the surface of
what we think we know.
Speaker 1: Perhaps someday we'll uncover definitive proof of giants, or maybe
we'll find something even more extraordinary. But one thing's for sure,
the journey of discovery is just as rewarding as the
destination itself.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into
the Giants of America. We hope you've enjoyed the exploration
and that it sparked your curiosity to learn more about
the world and its many mysteries. Until next time, keep exploring,
keep questioning, and keep diving deep.