Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, Telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the twenty fifth
Speaker 2: of March. You have our Lord, twenty twenty six. Well,
Speaker 2: it seems like every day that comes we have the
Speaker 2: federal government usurping more power and banning more things. Today
Speaker 2: we see that they're banning Wi Fi routers if they're
Speaker 2: not made in the United States. What's behind all of this?
Speaker 2: We're going to probably have to start looking at these
Speaker 2: signs saying they of free WiFi. We've got to look
Speaker 2: at that as a plea of liberation rather than a
Speaker 2: offer of services. And there is some good news that
Speaker 2: is coming up. Can we ban the Trump bioweapon, the
Speaker 2: mr and a GCI genetic code injection? Well, there are
Speaker 2: three states who are trying to do it. We're going
Speaker 2: to talk about which states and what is the basis
Speaker 2: of this. Of course, I'll also have updates on the war.
Speaker 2: Joy Clinty is going to be with us talking about
Speaker 2: the war, as well as taking a look at the economics.
Speaker 2: What is going on with gold? Why haven't we seen
Speaker 2: gold go up already? We'll be right back, stay with us. Yeah,
Speaker 2: free WiFi. Free WiFi from the Feds who want to
Speaker 2: tell you which routers you can buy now. They claim
Speaker 2: it's a national security issue. They're vulnerabilities that are built in.
Speaker 2: What is behind this is this crony capitalism? Is this protectionism?
Speaker 2: Is this the government wanting to have its own back
Speaker 2: doors into what you're doing, rather than perhaps a foreign
Speaker 2: company or foreign government. I think that's really what it
Speaker 2: is when you look at this, I think they want
Speaker 2: to put their own back door in. This is the
Speaker 2: same type of stuff we saw and talked about with
Speaker 2: five G and Huawei. They lay out all the issues
Speaker 2: they say, you know with five G, the companies that
Speaker 2: put this in, they can do this and this and this,
Speaker 2: and they can spy on everything that you do and
Speaker 2: so forth, and it's like, yeah, and so can you.
Speaker 2: So this is another one of those issues, I think.
Speaker 2: And yet what's even worse about this, what I think
Speaker 2: is really pouring salt into the wound, is this is
Speaker 2: not even being banned by Congress, not that Congress would
Speaker 2: have the authority to do that under the Constitution or
Speaker 2: the Tenth Amendment. Nobody in the federal government has the
Speaker 2: authority to do this, But where is it coming from?
Speaker 2: You know, just like we talked about gun control by
Speaker 2: executive order by Donald Trump, that was the worst possible scenario.
Speaker 2: That is worse than violating the Constitution by congressional law
Speaker 2: that takes a lot more effort. It's worse than violating
Speaker 2: it with a Supreme Court ruling, which doesn't take as
Speaker 2: much effort as the Congress, but still takes more effort
Speaker 2: than a single individual. And the individual working through taking
Speaker 2: that power for the presidency also is taking that power
Speaker 2: for the bureaucracy, which is under the executive branch. And
Speaker 2: that's where this is coming from. This ban is coming
Speaker 2: from the FCC. What gives them the right to do this?
Speaker 2: What gives the FCC the right to even exist? The
Speaker 2: sec is not in the constitution. It was a practical
Speaker 2: issue in terms of allocating spectrum, but they didn't need
Speaker 2: to have the FCC around to do that. You do
Speaker 2: that with a one time auction. You don't need to
Speaker 2: have an entire unconstitutional agency to hang around. You've got
Speaker 2: an unconstitutional agency looking for something to do, twiddling their
Speaker 2: thumbs and guess what, now they're going to be banning
Speaker 2: routers and this is the same guy Brendan Carr who
Speaker 2: whenever you have a mainstream legacy broadcaster like CBS or
Speaker 2: somebody else that says something that Trump doesn't like, he
Speaker 2: wants to take their license, and Brendan Carr is just
Speaker 2: fine with that. These people are out of control. So
Speaker 2: what is this? The White House convened interagency review that
Speaker 2: determined that these devices pose unaccepted threats to US households,
Speaker 2: critical infrastructure, and the economy. This is to the first
Speaker 2: Amendment of the bump stock to the second Amendment. Frankly,
Speaker 2: major brands like TPE Link, which has a dominant share
Speaker 2: of the US market Netgear, Google, Nest, Amazon, Eero, Cisco Link,
Speaker 2: sis Asis produce most models abroad, often in China, which
Speaker 2: controls an estimated sixty percent of US home router market.
Speaker 2: Of course, we've had reported about the program that the
Speaker 2: US government has were if interesting persons by a computer,
Speaker 2: they would route it through They had an agreement with
Speaker 2: the corporations and the shippers and so forth. They would
Speaker 2: route it through this facility they had in San Antonio,
Speaker 2: and they would load it up with things to surveil
Speaker 2: what that person is doing before they would deliver it.
Speaker 2: Then deliver it as a new product. But anyway this
Speaker 2: you look at this and say, well, the motivation of
Speaker 2: this might be crony capitalism helping his friends. One of
Speaker 2: these companies as part of this netgear, even though they
Speaker 2: do manufacturing abroad, they also do some manufacturing in the US,
Speaker 2: so their stock went up in anticipation that's going to
Speaker 2: be more protection for them. So it's protectionism, it's crony capitalism.
Speaker 2: It's the violation of the Constitution by the bureaucracy. Yet again,
Speaker 2: why because they won a surveillance state. So the FCC
Speaker 2: highlighted how malicious state and non state actors who exploited
Speaker 2: vulnerabilities and foreign made routers for cyber attacks on American civilians.
Speaker 2: That is always going to be the case. They might
Speaker 2: want to think about that before they put all of
Speaker 2: our military eggs in the artificial intelligence basket, or before
Speaker 2: they put all of our eggs anywhere on some online
Speaker 2: cloud data source. We've seen those things hacked over and
Speaker 2: over again. Companies can seek exemptions through the Department of
Speaker 2: Defense or the Department of Homeland Security. Think about that.
Speaker 2: You can't manufacture this, you can't bring in stuff unless
Speaker 2: you ask permission of the Defense Department or Homeland Security.
Speaker 2: Talk about a militarized police state. You are there and
Speaker 2: you will own nothing unless they expressly allow you to
Speaker 2: have it. The move bills on prior FCC actions, such
Speaker 2: as the December twenty twenty five ban on new foreign
Speaker 2: made drones. That's another thing they've banned. We didn't cover
Speaker 2: in a great deal of detail. Can't get your drones
Speaker 2: from abroad, well, you know we should. You don't really
Speaker 2: have a drone manufacturer here they have, nobody wanted to
Speaker 2: go into that business. Or because the China price in
Speaker 2: terms of slave labor, currency, manipulation, intellectual property, theft, all
Speaker 2: these other things that are giving China the advantage, they
Speaker 2: don't address that instead, whether they're just putting up is
Speaker 2: a wall, an economic wall. And so there's the lines
Speaker 2: with ongoing security of firms like tp link, which faces
Speaker 2: separate national security probes and a lawsuit from Texas over
Speaker 2: alledged deceptive marketing and data access risks. So just take
Speaker 2: a look at what's happened over the last few weeks.
Speaker 2: We've seen governments, whether it's state government or whether it's
Speaker 2: federal government, move to ban three D printers in effect
Speaker 2: say well, you're going to either be put out of
Speaker 2: business or you're going to go to the expense of
Speaker 2: maintaining a database. And every time somebody wants to print something,
Speaker 2: you go to the government database or the government approved
Speaker 2: database and look to see whether this particular file is
Speaker 2: approved for printing or not. Is it on the ban list.
Speaker 2: We don't want you printing three D gun parts, and
Speaker 2: we don't want you printing something that might be copyright issues.
Speaker 2: So unless you put that into your three D printer,
Speaker 2: we're going to ban your three D printer. That's going
Speaker 2: to ban three D printers altogether. It's too expensive for
Speaker 2: most to be able to do that, and even if
Speaker 2: you know, the ones who come through will be far
Speaker 2: more expensive because of this burdensome regulation. Everything that we
Speaker 2: see in our life. I mean, we just had an
Speaker 2: issue with a water heater, and whenever you got any
Speaker 2: kind of appliance around your home. You see how much
Speaker 2: more expensive it is when the government's got its own
Speaker 2: regulations and what they demand to have happen, which is
Speaker 2: not necessary. You know, we had a much better life
Speaker 2: when I was a child because they didn't have government
Speaker 2: micromanaging and raising the price of every single thing. Well,
Speaker 2: so they banned three D printers. Then we got California
Speaker 2: and some other places wanting to ban open source software,
Speaker 2: open source operating systems, and things like that. If you
Speaker 2: don't go through and do the know your customer stuff,
Speaker 2: if you don't put in digital ID and age verification
Speaker 2: for kids and all these other things that they want
Speaker 2: in there, then we will shut you down. So they're
Speaker 2: over and over again. They're banning stuff, and they're putting
Speaker 2: these onerous regulations on corporations, making their products more expensive,
Speaker 2: more difficult to obtain in a new way, and then
Speaker 2: shutting off things that a lot of people get, these
Speaker 2: secondary pieces of software because they want something that they
Speaker 2: know is open source. They can look at it and
Speaker 2: see that it is not spying on them. Government doesn't
Speaker 2: want you to be able to do that. The government
Speaker 2: wants you to pay more for their friends, the people
Speaker 2: who give them money, their owners and donors. You know,
Speaker 2: Google gives money to politicians, Apple does as well. So
Speaker 2: you need to get those proprietary operating systems. They are
Speaker 2: the only ones that are going to be able to
Speaker 2: comply with us. And then of course, now we've got
Speaker 2: banning routers. What's next, Well, I mean, just look at
Speaker 2: what they've done with cars and homes and how they're
Speaker 2: gradually strangling car and home ownership because they're onerous regulations. Well,
Speaker 2: just banning foreign made Wi Fi routers. Every router sold
Speaker 2: nationwide is at least partially built overseas, including popular models
Speaker 2: from Teepee Link and Netgear and so forth. And again,
Speaker 2: this is the way the economy, whether you like it
Speaker 2: or not, this is the way the economy has organized.
Speaker 2: And it is very much like what Leonard Reed talked
Speaker 2: about with Eyepencil. That's the way voluntary markets organized to
Speaker 2: try to make things more efficient. I know the Chinese
Speaker 2: government has stepped in in a very fascist, protectionist way,
Speaker 2: and so Trump wants to make this more like the
Speaker 2: Chinese government. I think we need to move in the
Speaker 2: opposite direction. But everything that he's doing is designed to
Speaker 2: blow up these bridges that we've got. And guess what
Speaker 2: he does it before we've got a solution domestically. It's
Speaker 2: just like his war. We're going to go in and
Speaker 2: blow up and run. It's like, well what about it?
Speaker 2: Take the straight up horome his ounon door about that?
Speaker 2: Now he's worried about it. Right, He goes in and
Speaker 2: he blows up the bridges to products that are made
Speaker 2: abroad and parts that are made abroad. Even for people
Speaker 2: who are doing domestic manufacturing, even if they build most
Speaker 2: of it here, they still got to get some parts
Speaker 2: from abroad. He just shuts it off like it's a
Speaker 2: faucet or something, even before there is something else to
Speaker 2: take its place. This is a pattern of behavior, pattern
Speaker 2: of insanity, really, and a self harm FCC said. The
Speaker 2: move is intended to prevent foreign adversaries like China and
Speaker 2: Russia from accessing equipment. You think that's going to stop them,
Speaker 2: You're not going to stop that with this. It's basically
Speaker 2: again it's protectionism, and it's our own government wanting to
Speaker 2: have its own back doors in this stuff. Scaling up
Speaker 2: production of fully US made routers is expected to take time.
Speaker 2: See Internet service providers could face challenges applying equipment to
Speaker 2: new customers. In other words, another problem, more self harm
Speaker 2: from Trump. He's like some mentally disturbed teenager themselves in
Speaker 2: the corner of the room. This is he's cutting us.
Speaker 2: He's not just cutting himself. There's no immediate threat to
Speaker 2: devices that are are in use are going to grandfather
Speaker 2: in the devices that are there. Isn't that nice of them?
Speaker 2: The move targets a global supply chain as always so
Speaker 2: Trump does with everything. Now he's at the global supply
Speaker 2: chain of energy. You know this, there's a pattern. Couldn't
Speaker 2: be a conspiracy or a plan cut it. You know.
Speaker 2: That's the real forty chess, the fact that these people
Speaker 2: got people to believe that Trump was a Republican instead
Speaker 2: of a New York City Democrat and got them to
Speaker 2: make excuses for all of the globalist democrat things that
Speaker 2: he's doing and blowing up the supply chain everywhere. And
Speaker 2: so China has historically supplied about sixty percent of these
Speaker 2: and they're going to just cut that off just right
Speaker 2: right away. So get ready for shortage of these things.
Speaker 2: You may want to get something now if you think
Speaker 2: you going to be in the market for a router
Speaker 2: anytime soon. Brendan Carr, Chairman of the FCC, said, I
Speaker 2: welcome this executive branch national security determination. I don't welcome
Speaker 2: the National Security status, I said many times, it's something
Speaker 2: that was an abomination that was created by Harry Truman,
Speaker 2: just like he created the NSA with an executive order,
Speaker 2: a secret executive order, just like he set us on
Speaker 2: the path of all of these non declared wars, calling
Speaker 2: it a police action. He was the one who set
Speaker 2: up the national security state. And we can't tell you
Speaker 2: anything about what we're doing. We operate completely in the dark,
Speaker 2: and you can't see what we're doing. What does that
Speaker 2: implid That invites corruption like nobody has ever seen, and
Speaker 2: that's what we've gotten ever since. I'm pleased, said Brendan
Speaker 2: Carr that the FCC has now added foreign produced routers,
Speaker 2: which were found to pose an unacceptable national security risk,
Speaker 2: to the FCC's covered list. I'll tell you what, if
Speaker 2: you're worried about it, take care of it with if
Speaker 2: your contractors that you're buying government products from or your
Speaker 2: military products from, Leave me alone. What I do has
Speaker 2: nothing to do with national security. There's nothing that I
Speaker 2: have that has to do with national security. I know
Speaker 2: you would like to eavedrop on everything that I'm doing
Speaker 2: because I'm opposed to you and everything that you are doing,
Speaker 2: But it's not about national security. This is just ridiculous.
Speaker 2: But this is a guy who wants to punish broadcasters
Speaker 2: for Trump. This is a guy who hates the First Amendment,
Speaker 2: he hates the Constitution, all the Bill of Rights for
Speaker 2: that matter. Just fascists carry out direct attacks against American
Speaker 2: civilians and their homes. He said, Well, none of us
Speaker 2: are worried about that. We don't need to be protected
Speaker 2: from that, just like we don't need to be protected
Speaker 2: by the TSA that fails ninety five percent of the time.
Speaker 2: You know, how in the world do we convince people
Speaker 2: that there's a threat. Well, they don't have to convince
Speaker 2: you of a threat, they just pronounce it as a thing. Right.
Speaker 2: The real threat, folks is Washington, d C. That's a
Speaker 2: threat to our lives. So we're not providing foreign actors
Speaker 2: or the built in back door. No, the Feds are
Speaker 2: the ones who want to have the back door. And
Speaker 2: we will find at some point in the future that
Speaker 2: there's this secret memo that in the name of national security,
Speaker 2: the router manufacturers are not allowed to say anything about it,
Speaker 2: and we'll find that they're mandating for them that they
Speaker 2: report everything that we do, give them a backdoor into
Speaker 2: what we're doing. Well, speaking of backdoors, this mail end
Speaker 2: voting election that Trump says we've got to pass save
Speaker 2: America act or the country's lost and he's going to
Speaker 2: do anything that he can to get this through. Well,
Speaker 2: it turns out that, you know, not only is this
Speaker 2: guy the father of the vote by mail elections, he's
Speaker 2: the one who started this. In twenty twenty, I remember
Speaker 2: very clearly saying you are setting up one of the
Speaker 2: worst risk for honest elections we've had when he did it,
Speaker 2: and he did it as part of the phony lockdown.
Speaker 2: Well now he just cast a mail end ballot himself.
Speaker 2: He says, mail in voting is mail end cheating. And
Speaker 2: yet that's what he did in mar Lago in a
Speaker 2: special election. Not only that, but you know, we've always
Speaker 2: had absentee ballots if you are sick, are going to
Speaker 2: be out of town on election day or whatever, And
Speaker 2: of course the election day is a very long period
Speaker 2: of time in most states now, but you always had
Speaker 2: the option if you were sick or disabled or going
Speaker 2: to be out of town to vote by mail. What
Speaker 2: changed was the way that Trump did. Everybody is voting
Speaker 2: by mail, and once they did it to that large extent,
Speaker 2: it is something that is a real security risk. I
Speaker 2: agree with him, but he's the one who created all
Speaker 2: of this stuff. He is a father of vote by
Speaker 2: mail corruption. And so the father of vote by mail
Speaker 2: corruption decided that he wanted to vote in this election,
Speaker 2: and even though he was in Palm Beach at the time,
Speaker 2: and even though he could have voted with early voting
Speaker 2: in person, he chose to do vote by mail. The
Speaker 2: guy is consistent in a way, isn't he. Trump is
Speaker 2: railed against voting by mail for years, claiming without evidence,
Speaker 2: says CBS. But I think there's plenty of evidence that
Speaker 2: if you just look at the way the thing has done,
Speaker 2: there's plenty of evidence that vote by mail and electronic
Speaker 2: voting machines are a real hazard, and you can find
Speaker 2: examples of it, but you can see that it is
Speaker 2: open to that type of corruption. Nevertheless, but they said
Speaker 2: his Save America Act would add more voter ID requirements
Speaker 2: and limit mail in voting. I think that's a good thing.
Speaker 2: But again, the hypocrisy of Trump in terms of being
Speaker 2: the creator of this and in terms of using it
Speaker 2: himself reeks as usual. But here's as we talked about
Speaker 2: him being the father of the mail and voting fraud
Speaker 2: is also the father of the COVID mRNA fraud and
Speaker 2: now We've got three states have offered bills that would
Speaker 2: declare these mRNA COVID shots quote weapons of mass destruction.
Speaker 2: How long have I been calling it weapons of mass destruction?
Speaker 2: I've been calling it a bioweapon for years because it
Speaker 2: is a bioweapon. And I'm not the only one who's
Speaker 2: been calling it that. You've got a lot of scientists,
Speaker 2: even a lot of public health organizations and some other
Speaker 2: foreign governments who have called it a bioweapon. Well, the
Speaker 2: three states that are doing this are Minnesota, Arizona, and
Speaker 2: our own Tennessee. They've now introduced legislation designating mRNA injections
Speaker 2: as quote, biological weapons of mass destruction last year in
Speaker 2: Minnesota was the first to propose a law criminalizing mRNA jabs,
Speaker 2: following it Arizona earlier this year, and now Tennessee, Idaho, Iowa, Montana,
Speaker 2: South Carolina have introduced this. And Tennessee have previously sought
Speaker 2: to restrict the use of mr and a technology. It's
Speaker 2: only a matter of time before these injections become outlawed,
Speaker 2: predicted Nicholas Holzer, who is with the McCullough Foundation, an
Speaker 2: epidemiologist and administrator there. Holser noted that if the Arizona
Speaker 2: Bill gets enacted into law, quote, processing, distributing, or manufacturing
Speaker 2: these shots will constitute terrorism. You know, it really was
Speaker 2: terrorism if you stop and think about it, that entire
Speaker 2: COVID mcguffin scaring people to death over something that's not real,
Speaker 2: but using scare tactics, using violence and threats of violence.
Speaker 2: They did get violent with people if you didn't follow
Speaker 2: their policies. Right, all of that that is terrorism, and
Speaker 2: so he said, and rightfully so should be called terrorism
Speaker 2: and have related charges and even life imprisonment given these
Speaker 2: shots have killed, injured and disabled millions upon millions of
Speaker 2: people across the globe, rivaling hundreds of EROSIAA nuclear attacks.
Speaker 2: It is a weapon of mass destruction. Again, you know,
Speaker 2: Trump keeps lying to us about how many lives he's
Speaker 2: saved and all the rest of this stuff. It's pure fantasy,
Speaker 2: not a shred of evidence. There's plenty of evidence of mess.
Speaker 2: You can look at the epidemiological charts. You can look
Speaker 2: at the excess desk. Yes, the excess desks started going
Speaker 2: up in twenty twenty because they were doing things like
Speaker 2: putting people on ventilators that had respiratory issues and killing
Speaker 2: them ninety percent of the people dying. But the Trump
Speaker 2: administration was rewarding hospitals for doing that, rewarding them for
Speaker 2: pointing at somebody saying, you've got the magic mystery disease, right,
Speaker 2: twenty percent bonus for everything you do in the hospital,
Speaker 2: and we'll give you thirteen thousand dollars if you point
Speaker 2: at him and say that they've got the disease instant
Speaker 2: thirteen thousand dollars plus the twenty percent bonus on everything
Speaker 2: in the hospital. And if you put them on a
Speaker 2: ventilator thirty nine thousand dollars. Of course they're going to
Speaker 2: do that to people. They hold life cheaply. It's about
Speaker 2: making money because the corporations have been taken over. The
Speaker 2: corporations have taken over the hospitals, and the doctors are
Speaker 2: not in control anymore. It's the bureaucrats and the corporations
Speaker 2: that are in control of healthcare. And so we saw
Speaker 2: an increase in the number of excess deaths. But you
Speaker 2: can see everywhere when the mRNA shot rolls out, you
Speaker 2: can see a massive spike go up in deaths. It
Speaker 2: killed a lot of people right away, and then there's
Speaker 2: a lot of people who are still dying from turbo cancer,
Speaker 2: still dying from heart disease like myocarditis, paar carditis, dying
Speaker 2: from blood clots, dying from this spike protein, this genetic
Speaker 2: code injection that I've been calling it since twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: that changes your body. I mean, why didn't anybody Why
Speaker 2: didn't anybody see this? When Trump goes around, it says
Speaker 2: how long is it going to take you to manufacture?
Speaker 2: And they say, oh, we got something. We can do
Speaker 2: it right now, because we're going to turn your body
Speaker 2: into a manufacturing plan. I said, okay, stop right there.
Speaker 2: I see a problem with this. I don't want my
Speaker 2: body turned into some kind of a manufacturing facility for anything.
Speaker 2: And how do I turn it off? Well, it turns
Speaker 2: out you don't turn it off. That's why this thing
Speaker 2: is so long lasting and why we don't have a
Speaker 2: final number. It's an ongoing thing. The Minnesota bill clearly
Speaker 2: states it is quote the intent of the legislature to
Speaker 2: designate mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction.
Speaker 2: Tennessee's bill is known as the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act.
Speaker 2: It was introduced last week and it prohibits the manufacturer acquisition, possession,
Speaker 2: or making accessible to others of mRNA injections and products.
Speaker 2: It requires state and local government officials to use all
Speaker 2: lawful means necessary to investigate or to enforce suspected violations.
Speaker 2: It punishes violations the same as manufacturing requiring, possessing or
Speaker 2: transferring a weapon of mass destruction, which is a Class
Speaker 2: B felony. So it's been introduced in Tennessee, Arizona, and Minnesota.
Speaker 2: We should try to get the state senator who's introduced
Speaker 2: at Janis Bowling. We should try to get her on
Speaker 2: the show. Give her a thank you, thank you for
Speaker 2: the Sandy. We've had a bill that was introduced in
Speaker 2: Tennessee talking about not putting mRNA and foods, tenetically engineering
Speaker 2: it into foods, and that was mocked by the mainstream media.
Speaker 2: Look at these people, you know, they're paranoid conspiracy theorists.
Speaker 2: It's like, well, we're not paranoid. It's already been talked about.
Speaker 2: You've got and the guy who put it in I
Speaker 2: think was a doctor as well as a representative. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he said, here's the articles where they're bragging about that's
Speaker 2: what they're going to do how they're going to deliver it.
Speaker 2: We don't want drugs put in our food, by the way,
Speaker 2: we don't want drugs put into our drinking water either,
Speaker 2: like fluoride anything else. Why would you dose people through
Speaker 2: their food and water? Makes absolutely no sense if you
Speaker 2: really are talking about health again, if you're looking at something,
Speaker 2: let's say that you've got a drug and you want
Speaker 2: to be safe and effective. Well, if you get too
Speaker 2: much of anything, it's not safe, and if you get
Speaker 2: too little of what you're trying to get is not
Speaker 2: effective either. Dose means everything. Why would you put it
Speaker 2: into the water supply? Why would you put it into
Speaker 2: the food? So mRNA based injections instruct human cells to
Speaker 2: produce a genetic spike protein. Yeah, and you can't turn
Speaker 2: that thing off. People are still producing it after several
Speaker 2: years in some cases. This is a report by the
Speaker 2: way from Life site News. Life Site News report it
Speaker 2: last fall, But more than eighty one thousand physicians, scientists,
Speaker 2: researchers and concerned citizens, two hundred and forty elected government officials,
Speaker 2: and seventeen professional public health and physician organizations have demanded
Speaker 2: withdrawal of the COVID nineteen shots from the market. Well,
Speaker 2: I'm one of those. I didn't record it anywhere except
Speaker 2: on my program. I never signed up on any any
Speaker 2: list that I saw anywhere. I'd be happy to do that,
Speaker 2: But again, I guess you know. The counting added to
Speaker 2: eighty one thousand and one concerned citizens and physicians and scientists.
Speaker 2: The total number of COVID nineteen shot deaths reported to
Speaker 2: the VARs adjusted deaths exceeds five hundred and eighty nine
Speaker 2: thousand in the US and seventeen million around the globe.
Speaker 2: And again, why they set up this vaccine adverse events
Speaker 2: recording system if they're not going to pay any attention
Speaker 2: to it. We've had situations in the past where a
Speaker 2: vaccine was noted to be responsible for nine deaths, not
Speaker 2: nine hundred, not nine thousand, not nine million, but nine deaths,
Speaker 2: and it was banned in several states. Why can't we
Speaker 2: do it with this? It is long past time to
Speaker 2: do that. Well, as we look at the medical profession,
Speaker 2: we have this article here from futurism. A doctor reels
Speaker 2: as her son becomes a plumber in the age of AI.
Speaker 2: She said, Am I the blip in my family's more
Speaker 2: traditional working class journey in other words, everybody in my
Speaker 2: family is always working class. I went to college, I
Speaker 2: became a doctor. Now now my son is going to
Speaker 2: become a plumber. Oh no, she said, I want to
Speaker 2: pay this for it. I feel like I'm disrespecting my
Speaker 2: parents because it was so important for them for me
Speaker 2: to go to college and get a college education become
Speaker 2: a doctor. And it's like, well, maybe your son sees
Speaker 2: something that you don't. I would pat the son on
Speaker 2: the back and I'd say, well done, you've read the
Speaker 2: signs of the time.
Speaker 3: There works more like no job that is guaranteed, that's right. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you're not guaranteed to make a living making our with
Speaker 3: a I coming online. You're not guaranteed to be able
Speaker 3: to be a doctor.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: That's just how the market works.
Speaker 2: And it's going to take a lot longer for them
Speaker 2: to replace plumbers with AI and robots.
Speaker 3: I'm not doing that.
Speaker 2: They don't want to get them. I guess. Yeah, he
Speaker 2: wants to probably do new construction rather than I'm clogging
Speaker 2: toilets here.
Speaker 3: I am brain the size of a planet.
Speaker 2: Letting down her parents, he said, who worked hard to
Speaker 2: elevator social and academic position. We need to not be
Speaker 2: kelled captive to our degrees. I've known so many people
Speaker 2: and so many different professions that really hated what they
Speaker 2: were doing, but they felt captive to it. I spend
Speaker 2: so much time getting this degree, and that's what I am,
Speaker 2: and that's my identity. I can't stop and go do
Speaker 2: something else. As I get over that. We should all
Speaker 2: be open to doing something where we are, where we
Speaker 2: are valued. As a matter of the old story about
Speaker 2: the rich father who gives his child a watch and says,
Speaker 2: you know, take it down to the pawn shop and
Speaker 2: take it to this place and that place a jeweler.
Speaker 2: See how much they'll give you for it, you know,
Speaker 2: and I think, give a couple hundred dollars or whatever.
Speaker 2: And then finally says, take it to the museum. And
Speaker 2: take to the museum, and they go, oh, this is
Speaker 2: very rare, very old. We'll give you tens of thousands
Speaker 2: of dollars for it. And he says, you know, you
Speaker 2: want to understand that some people are not going to
Speaker 2: value what you have. Don't deal with those people. Find
Speaker 2: the person that values what you have. That is unique.
Speaker 2: And that really applies to the work that we do
Speaker 2: as well. A Democrat bill could dismantle homeschooling freedoms in Connecticut.
Speaker 2: This is also from life site News. Connecticut, interestingly enough,
Speaker 2: is one of the more free states right now, and
Speaker 2: they're about to flip the switch and go exactly in
Speaker 2: the opposite directions, warning to all of us. We had
Speaker 2: a similar situation like this in the late nineteen teen
Speaker 2: eighties and or was it the early nineteen nineties, I
Speaker 2: can't remember. In North probably the nineties, because we were
Speaker 2: already involved in the homeschooling stuff and the Democrats and
Speaker 2: the Teachers Union wanted to ban homeschooling. The homeschoolers got
Speaker 2: together and this small group of homeschoolers got very active
Speaker 2: writing letters. And so few people ever communicate with their
Speaker 2: elected representatives to say what they like and don't like that.
Speaker 2: This number of people, a small number of people. They
Speaker 2: looked at that and thought there was a lot more behind.
Speaker 2: And it's kind of like the stories that you hear
Speaker 2: about the Civil War, where you at the very beginning
Speaker 2: you would have some several cases of this where the
Speaker 2: Union army would show up and had this massive army,
Speaker 2: and the Confederates on the other side only had a
Speaker 2: few people. They started, they found a clearing where the
Speaker 2: other people could see them, and they started marching in
Speaker 2: a circle, and they thought there was this huge army
Speaker 2: that was on the other side. That's basically what we
Speaker 2: did with the homeschoolers writing letters to the elected representatives
Speaker 2: in North Carolina, and we beat the teachers union and
Speaker 2: the Democrats in that and so that is where Connecticut
Speaker 2: is right now. The Connecticut Education Committee voted twenty six
Speaker 2: to twenty to advance the controversial legislation that would impose
Speaker 2: greater burdens on homeschooling moms and dads. It is titled
Speaker 2: innocently as a bill about quote equivalent instruction, but it
Speaker 2: would mandate curriculum review. It would essentially get your name
Speaker 2: turned into the local school district officials, who, even though
Speaker 2: they have an interest in keeping your kid in school,
Speaker 2: would have to approve. So it would be basically not
Speaker 2: allowed unless you get express permission. They take a rite
Speaker 2: and turn it into a privilege granted by the people
Speaker 2: who want to have monopoly on your child's education, and
Speaker 2: they would be empowered to withhold permission until the Department
Speaker 2: of Children and Families what we typically call CPS Child
Speaker 2: Protection Services confirms that there's no child abuse, So you're
Speaker 2: guilty until you prove that you're not abusing your child.
Speaker 2: You have to get your curriculum approved by them, and
Speaker 2: on and on. You can see all the dangers in this,
Speaker 2: can't you. Advocates for the increased regulation site several horrific
Speaker 2: examples of children who were removed from public school under
Speaker 2: the guys of homeschooling then were hideously abused. You know,
Speaker 2: I can go through in any given state, in any
Speaker 2: given month that I can find a charge of some
Speaker 2: teacher or somebody at that school, at a school, and
Speaker 2: that jurisdiction that is abused a child. Sending your kid
Speaker 2: to school doesn't mean that they're not going to be
Speaker 2: abused by some teacher or administrator or anybody who's in
Speaker 2: that school, and so that happens everywhere. Unfortunately, it's not
Speaker 2: something that is indicative of parents. It's more likely to
Speaker 2: happen with strangers that are there, and so it can
Speaker 2: happen anywhere. There's no guarantee. And if you love your child,
Speaker 2: you want to make that's one of the reasons that
Speaker 2: you want to keep them away from these institutions where
Speaker 2: you don't know what's happening. But the institutions have now
Speaker 2: institutionalized the abuse. That's what all this transgender stuff is.
Speaker 2: It is institutionalized child abuse. You're going to play psychological
Speaker 2: games and gas like these kids, telling them that they're
Speaker 2: in the wrong body so that you can go sterilize
Speaker 2: them and mutilate them. Seriously, it is institutionalized child abuse.
Speaker 2: In most of these government schools, especially the runs. They're
Speaker 2: being run by the Blue stays, by the Democrats, and
Speaker 2: so Homeschool Legal Defense Association, they're your friends if you're homeschooling,
Speaker 2: they are on it. And so this turns the whole
Speaker 2: idea of printal rights upside down. And that's the whole
Speaker 2: purpose of all this stuff is to take away the
Speaker 2: whole idea of putting out children's rights. That's the UN
Speaker 2: idea UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Purpose
Speaker 2: of that was to take possession of the children so
Speaker 2: the village could raise the children and to terminate parental rights.
Speaker 2: And we keep seeing that over and over again, whether
Speaker 2: you're talking about curriculum that's being taught, or you're talking
Speaker 2: about the transgender issues and other things. So critics one
Speaker 2: of the legislation could lead to mandated vaccinations, as well
Speaker 2: as other heavy handed state involvement. Public backlash against the
Speaker 2: bill has dwarfed support of it. About forty two thousand
Speaker 2: people have filed witness slips opposing the bill, only one
Speaker 2: thousand have filed public support for it forty two to
Speaker 2: one against. Well, that will that work? I don't know. Now,
Speaker 2: here's one other thing you need to know about this.
Speaker 3: Also, I think it's worth pointing out that most of
Speaker 3: the people that tend to be obsessive about this kind
Speaker 3: of legislation, Oh, we have to control your children, we
Speaker 3: have to know what you're doing with your kids, very
Speaker 3: rarely have children themselves. Yeah, this is continually the position
Speaker 3: espoused by these extremely liberal, single white women who have
Speaker 3: become teachers that feel that they have some kind of
Speaker 3: intrinsic right to brainwash your children into what they believe.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, there is also a coalition for Responsible
Speaker 2: Home Education. What this is. This is what they're trying
Speaker 2: to do, is to eliminate home education. Sounds like they're
Speaker 2: in support of it, but they're not.
Speaker 3: The same way that planned parenthood is about, actually.
Speaker 2: Has planned non parenthood. Yeah, this is also folks, Just
Speaker 2: to remember This is being funded by the Ben and
Speaker 2: Jerry Foundation. So I remember that when you're at the
Speaker 2: grocery store about Ben and Jerry. And this is what
Speaker 2: the foundation says. It is explicitly anti Christian. They say
Speaker 2: Christian fundamentalists in the United States have worked to enact
Speaker 2: their regressive ideas about gender and race by using homeschooling
Speaker 2: to isolate and to abuse their own children. Well, yes,
Speaker 2: I don't like what you call your progressive ideas about
Speaker 2: gender and race, and so yeah that we do homeschooling
Speaker 2: to protect our kids from that, but that's not abuse.
Speaker 2: Abuses What you do psychologically and physically to kids will
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 1: H you're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 4: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 4: mobile device. Get the APS radio app today and listen
Speaker 4: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: Well, I want to give you an update on the
Speaker 2: Valero refinery fire. We talked about that. It was happening
Speaker 2: just as we're going on air the other day and
Speaker 2: Port Arthur, Texas, and so as we talked about it,
Speaker 2: I said, well, not sure what this is. Is this
Speaker 2: a terrorist attack, is it a false flag attack? Is
Speaker 2: it just the ordinary danger of operating in these refineries. Well,
Speaker 2: it turns out that it was c It was ordinary
Speaker 2: dangers of operating these refineries. This is what they said.
Speaker 2: They said the release of processed fluid and complex two
Speaker 2: led to an ignition event, that's what we call a fire.
Speaker 2: It and significant damage to key units, including the diesel
Speaker 2: hydrotreater and fluid catalytic cracker. The fire sent black smoke
Speaker 2: into the sky and caused shockwaves that were felt for
Speaker 2: miles away. There were, however, no injuries, no fatalities. All
Speaker 2: seven hundred and seventy employees were accounted for. The fires
Speaker 2: were extinguished, and the roads were opened early the next day.
Speaker 2: And it took a little bit longer for them to
Speaker 2: give the all clear on the air pollution, but that
Speaker 2: is over with now as well. So we're glad to
Speaker 2: see that that wasn't an attack of any kind. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: we have I talked about this the other day, how
Speaker 2: we had the manipulation of the marketplace by Donald Trump
Speaker 2: and how he you know, just a couple of minutes
Speaker 2: before he makes his announcement, Oh, we're not going to
Speaker 2: set the Middle East on fire in a few hours. Instead,
Speaker 2: we're going to give him another five days because we've
Speaker 2: got great talks that are going on right now. That
Speaker 2: appears to be not true according to the Iranians. So
Speaker 2: they say, well, we're not talking. I don't know who
Speaker 2: he's talking to. And Trump just a couple of days
Speaker 2: before said I don't even know who to talk to.
Speaker 2: You know, we killed everybody there was any kind of
Speaker 2: leadership position that we could identify, so we don't know
Speaker 2: who to talk to. But now he says that he's
Speaker 2: been having talks with people, and yet some people who
Speaker 2: are there still say that's not happening. Nevertheless, there's been
Speaker 2: yet another In that particular case, he had one and
Speaker 2: a half billion dollars bet that was on the doll
Speaker 2: in terms of betting that the stock market was going
Speaker 2: to go up, and another one hundred and ninety two
Speaker 2: million dollars bet on oil markets, betting that they were
Speaker 2: going to go down. And of course that did happen.
Speaker 2: As soon as people saw something of a little bit
Speaker 2: of hope, the market reacts immediately, right. And so now
Speaker 2: we've got another betting that is going on. This is
Speaker 2: on polymarket, and you've got poly market accounts that are
Speaker 2: making suspicious bets on a ceasefire in Iran. Well, I
Speaker 2: hope they do have some inside information. I hope that
Speaker 2: does happen. So the difference is is that you've got
Speaker 2: polymarket which is not based in the United States and
Speaker 2: so can manipulate it and it's not the law can't
Speaker 2: reach them on this. And there's been several instances of
Speaker 2: this as well. When you had the kidnapping of Maduro
Speaker 2: in Venezuela that was predicted with a fairly large bet
Speaker 2: several hundred thousand dollars, and somebody placed that bet right
Speaker 2: before it happened.
Speaker 3: Can I just say the market, how lame the future is?
Speaker 3: You know, back in the nineteen fifties, they're like, we're
Speaker 3: gonna have flying cars, We're gonna have jet packs.
Speaker 2: Well we don't have that.
Speaker 3: But you can gamble on whether the US is going
Speaker 3: to invade a country. You can gamble on whether we'll
Speaker 3: assassinate another world leader. So that's something.
Speaker 2: So height of corruption. But what else What would we
Speaker 2: expect when we got a failed casino owner for a
Speaker 2: president that people are gambling on wars?
Speaker 3: This is you might as well double down on your vices.
Speaker 3: You know, if you like murder, you might as well
Speaker 3: gamble on the murder as well.
Speaker 2: I guess right, well, somebody's making a lot of money
Speaker 2: off of this stuff. Let me tell you, I put
Speaker 2: down a one and a half billion dollar bet stock
Speaker 2: market's going to go up, and of course it's to
Speaker 2: go off when he puts out news that it's going
Speaker 2: to be perceived as Now.
Speaker 3: Of course, a bet that size means either it's someone
Speaker 3: with so much money that a billion dollars is nothing
Speaker 3: to them and there's very few people of though like
Speaker 3: that in the world, or they have some serious inside
Speaker 3: information on what's going on. I seriously doubt people just
Speaker 3: throw a billion dollars away on it. Who knows, Maybe
Speaker 3: could be.
Speaker 2: I'd say it's all of the above, right, But you
Speaker 2: can bet the cash betelling this corrupt. FBI is not
Speaker 2: going to do any investigations on this. I mean, they
Speaker 2: went after Martha Stewart for insider trading, and she didn't
Speaker 2: do insider trading. She went to jail because they caught
Speaker 2: her on a perjury trap as part of that process,
Speaker 2: but she wasn't doing insider trading. These people are doing
Speaker 2: insider trading, and so there is another one of these
Speaker 2: market places that does this kind of trading. That's Caushi
Speaker 2: and they are based in the United States, and they
Speaker 2: just busted a guy who was a producer for mister
Speaker 2: Beast because he was doing some insider trading, so they
Speaker 2: to him, they find him, took money from him, and
Speaker 2: they reported him to the federal government. But that's not
Speaker 2: the case with polymarket. And so the vast majority of
Speaker 2: poly market users are wagering that a ceasefire will not happen.
Speaker 2: By March the thirty first, only seventeen percent are voting
Speaker 2: yes on that. Twenty two million dollars has been wagered
Speaker 2: on either outcome of the prediction. Most of them think
Speaker 2: that the war is going to continue, and they wager
Speaker 2: that it will be. The big yes rises to seventy
Speaker 2: six percent if they talk about a ceasefire by the
Speaker 2: end of this year. But for the end of this month,
Speaker 2: there's only seventeen percent of people, and so big bet
Speaker 2: has been put on that. Just like we saw before,
Speaker 2: and as I talked about yesterday, the corruption truly is
Speaker 2: amazing that we see. Here's the report that somebody else
Speaker 2: did on the corruption that we saw played on the marketplace,
Speaker 2: the stock market, and the commodity market for.
Speaker 5: Oil here's the curious thing, and here's kind of where
Speaker 5: the mystery is. I want to kind of zoom in
Speaker 5: on this area here, so I'll kind of zoom in
Speaker 5: so you can see. This is just the volumes of
Speaker 5: people going into that oil market and for the most
Speaker 5: part selling after that Donald Trump post. You can see
Speaker 5: there's this real spike in activity, a lot of people
Speaker 5: going in their this frenzy and that's the kind of
Speaker 5: flip side of prices. But look at this. Fifteen minutes
Speaker 5: before that Donald Trump post, there was a very big
Speaker 5: amount of trading volume, very big in fact, actually when
Speaker 5: you're looking at that amount of volume, that spike, that
Speaker 5: was the biggest trading volume that we saw that day.
Speaker 5: We're starting here just at eight o'clock in the morning,
Speaker 5: we're going through to that moment of the Donald Trump post,
Speaker 5: relatively quiet volumes, not much going on in the market,
Speaker 5: and then all of a sudden that And if you're wondering, okay,
Speaker 5: maybe this was just a one off, it was someone
Speaker 5: who made a look at have a look not just this.
Speaker 5: So this is w measure, the US measure of oil.
Speaker 5: Have a look at Brent's which is the kind of
Speaker 5: the European seen as the international measure of oil. Again,
Speaker 5: the same thing. Donald Trump makes his post flurry of activity,
Speaker 5: lots of people there, but look at that fifteen minutes
Speaker 5: before that, Donald Trump post a very big trade both
Speaker 5: of the right, whether it's just an individual or whether
Speaker 5: it's a kind of group of people, and.
Speaker 2: Then knew the stag market that was even bigger.
Speaker 5: Incusing what the potential value, the notional value of those
Speaker 5: trades just on oil would be. It is staggering amounts
Speaker 5: of money, life changing amounts of money. Five hundred and
Speaker 5: eighty million dollars. Someone has just made a real killing
Speaker 5: on this and it's not just oil. So that oil.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so this article here about what's happening on
Speaker 2: polymarket and when there's going to be a ceasefire declared.
Speaker 2: That is a seventy thousand dollars bet. But in the
Speaker 2: will market somebody made one hundred and ninety two million,
Speaker 2: and then on the stock market they made a one
Speaker 2: and a half billion bet.
Speaker 6: Well, I think we have to understand that we're dealing
Speaker 6: with one Hunter Biden levels of corruption now exactly in
Speaker 6: the Trump White House. Let me explain why you put
Speaker 6: the oil trade up there? There was a bet that
Speaker 6: the price of oil would tank. That was a bet
Speaker 6: of about one hundred and fifty million. Another bet was
Speaker 6: placed that the market would lift, in other words, rise dramatically.
Speaker 6: That was a one point five billion dollar bet. Now,
Speaker 6: whenever you bet in the market, which is effectively what
Speaker 6: it's about, it's a big casino, you know, for those
Speaker 6: who were only in it.
Speaker 2: It's a casino where Trump is finally winning.
Speaker 6: Post others that draw income from it over time. What
Speaker 6: we need to understand is that you bet less on
Speaker 6: the downside and bet more on the upside. So the
Speaker 6: one hundred and fifty million dollar bet paid off because
Speaker 6: somebody within three or four minutes of the President Trump's
Speaker 6: announcement knew what President Trump was going to announce. The
Speaker 6: same thing was true for the one point zero five
Speaker 6: billion bet that you've got up there. Now, both of
Speaker 6: these bets paid off handsomely. Now, who in the White
Speaker 6: House could possibly have known and who in the White
Speaker 6: House has access to that kind of capital that could
Speaker 6: have a stupendous impact on profits. Well, I'll let everybody
Speaker 6: in the audience sort of sink let that sink in,
Speaker 6: think about it and.
Speaker 2: Understand, hell is not going to be investigating this.
Speaker 6: Normal setting for this to happen, I would say fifty
Speaker 6: years ago, one hundred years ago, maybe even thirty years ago,
Speaker 6: the Attorney General would have be sitting at his desk
Speaker 6: or her desk and receive a note saying, we have
Speaker 6: witness this unnatural market behavior that's resulting in megaprofits, and
Speaker 6: it all seems to come right before the President makes
Speaker 6: an announcement. We feel this justifies an investigation. Well, I
Speaker 6: don't think with Pam Bondi in there, there's any chance
Speaker 6: of that investigation happening. As a kid said, Now, then
Speaker 6: the question is, well, what about Congress. Will someone in
Speaker 6: Congress stand up and say, look at this, this is outrageous. Maybe,
Speaker 6: but it's unlikely that it will gain much traction because
Speaker 6: the population of people that sit on the hill in
Speaker 6: Congress are busy with insider trading another word. Everyone in
Speaker 6: Washington is profiting one way or another from the disasters
Speaker 6: that are unfolding in front of us on the hill
Speaker 6: and here, you know, in the Middle East and here
Speaker 6: at home. So I really really want the Maga crowd
Speaker 6: to pay attention to this because they've been taken in
Speaker 6: badly by this president, misused, abused, and exploited. They need
Speaker 6: to wake up and understand the kind of Hunter Biden
Speaker 6: level of corruption that they're dealing with in the Trump
Speaker 6: White House.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely right, And of course, yeah, don't hold your breath,
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi's not going to do it. Cash Hotel is
Speaker 2: not going to do it, Dan Bonge, you wouldn't do
Speaker 2: it if he was there. They're not going to investigate Epstein.
Speaker 2: They're not going to investigate this stuff. And by the way,
Speaker 2: they didn't investigate who made all of those big financial
Speaker 2: bets on Wall Street and one about nine eleven. Remember
Speaker 2: that we talked about profiting from the death of Americans.
Speaker 2: That was huge. And yet Trump says we're winning. I
Speaker 2: guess winter Winter chicken dinner right long for a ceasefire?
Speaker 2: Fitly at a reopen dialogue, wouldn't there the pot?
Speaker 7: Well, look, we can have dialogue, but we don't. I
Speaker 7: don't want to do a ceasefire. You know, you don't
Speaker 7: do a ceasefire when you're.
Speaker 2: Remember this if he does it by March thirty. First,
Speaker 2: they don't have.
Speaker 7: An air force, they don't have any equipment too, they
Speaker 7: don't have any spy they don't have anti aircraft.
Speaker 2: So why do you attack them? They've never had it.
Speaker 7: They've all been killed at every level.
Speaker 8: We're not looking to do that, thank you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The bottom line is they never had an air force,
Speaker 2: not except with a Shaw, never had an air force.
Speaker 2: I never had a navy. They weren't projecting power that
Speaker 2: could threaten us, So why did you attack them? Right? Well,
Speaker 2: we got a former m I six. This guy was
Speaker 2: I forget what his title was there, but he was
Speaker 2: with m I six. He was asked who's winning. He
Speaker 2: has a very different opinion than Trump.
Speaker 8: Who has the upper hand Right now.
Speaker 2: They're on former Chief of am IF.
Speaker 9: I regret having come to this conclusion because like many
Speaker 9: m I six officers of my generation, we've faced the
Speaker 9: violence and brutality of the IOGC for most of our careers.
Speaker 10: Just the Islamic Revolutionary Yard's call.
Speaker 9: So there is no love lost between and I shed
Speaker 9: no tears for alikam and A, who was killed at
Speaker 9: the beginning of this war. But the reality is the
Speaker 9: US underestimated the task and I think as of about
Speaker 9: two weeks ago, lost the initiative to Iran. In practice,
Speaker 9: the Iranian regime has been more resilient than I think
Speaker 9: anyone would have expected. They took some good decisions actually
Speaker 9: as early as last June about dispersing their military capability
Speaker 9: and delegating the authority for the use of those weapons,
Speaker 9: which has given them significant extra resilience against this incredibly
Speaker 9: powerful air campaign. They have embarked on what's technically called
Speaker 9: horizontal escalation, i firing rockets at anybody within range, which
Speaker 9: at the time honestly shows Sheenka I thought was nuts,
Speaker 9: but in fact has been a very good way of
Speaker 9: putting in direct price on the US.
Speaker 2: Sort of worked.
Speaker 9: And then they've understood the significance of the energy war
Speaker 9: and held the Straits at threat and globalized and essentially
Speaker 9: not internationalized, just globalized the conflict in a way that
Speaker 9: gives them some weapons. So you know, they've played a
Speaker 9: weekend pretty well. My second point is that Donald Trump
Speaker 9: has said some stuff that will have confirmed something they
Speaker 9: knew already, which is that they're in a civilizational war.
Speaker 9: In their terms, they're in a war of existence. Donald
Speaker 9: Trump made it very clear that he wanted to see
Speaker 9: them up against the wall basically, whereas America has evolved
Speaker 9: in those terms. I think that's imbued them with more
Speaker 9: staying power than the US and the US counterparts. That's right,
Speaker 9: war threat, that really is giving them the whip hand.
Speaker 2: You attack people in a war of aggression, you tell
Speaker 2: them that they're in an existential fight. We're going to
Speaker 2: try to wipe you off of the map. What do
Speaker 2: you expect them to do? And they're not stupid, and
Speaker 2: you've given them all the motivation that they could possibly have.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, you've given them motivation to
Speaker 2: run to the existing regime that you said you wanted
Speaker 2: to change. You've given them motivation to get behind that regime,
Speaker 2: killing and destroying in a much greater extent than even
Speaker 2: the evil regime that was there before. And so as
Speaker 2: Trump is saying, well, there's nobody to talk to over
Speaker 2: the weekend, and then somehow he figured out that he
Speaker 2: found some people to talk to. He said, this is
Speaker 2: why the former editor of the Wall Street Journal said
Speaker 2: he's become bag dad Bob. He said that it's sad
Speaker 2: to say, but the Iranians are more credible than our
Speaker 2: own government. That's the first time we've seen that he's
Speaker 2: had in my lifetime. But it is quite evident that
Speaker 2: Trump is lying. He doesn't even try to come up
Speaker 2: with any plausible lies. This is the same type of
Speaker 2: stuff that we saw in Minnesota, the same kind of
Speaker 2: stuff that we heard from him, as well as from
Speaker 2: christin Nulm. Well, they were stuck in the snow, and
Speaker 2: after everybody had seen the video except them, they had
Speaker 2: so little interest and their conduct and the conduct of
Speaker 2: their agents, they didn't even bother to look at the video.
Speaker 2: That's such contempt for our intelligence, such contempt for the truth.
Speaker 2: They just make up a story, and they don't even
Speaker 2: make their stories consistent with each other because they think
Speaker 2: we're so stupid we don't understand what's going on. Well,
Speaker 2: on March the ninth, Trump announced that the war was
Speaker 2: winding down. I don't see anybody other than Donald Trump
Speaker 2: and Warpete, nobody else outside of that actual regime except
Speaker 2: for Ben Shapiro saying that we're winning the war. Everybody
Speaker 2: else says that this is a war that's going to
Speaker 2: be lost. It's going to be lost. And I think
Speaker 2: the regime change we're going to get is Trump and
Speaker 2: it's nothing that I rejoice about. I mean, I don't
Speaker 2: want to see the Iranians winning, and I don't want
Speaker 2: to see the Democrats winning. But when you look at
Speaker 2: Trump and these other it's just they keep getting us
Speaker 2: involved in one war after the other. It's one thing
Speaker 2: after that was the name of that movie, with one
Speaker 2: battle after the other. So that's what the Trump regime
Speaker 2: has been. And now with this asymmetric warfare that they're doing,
Speaker 2: it's an asymmetric economic warfare, and it's going to have
Speaker 2: the entire globe hating America because they all hate Trump,
Speaker 2: even more so than the terraffs. And so that is
Speaker 2: what we're looking at here. And when Trump comes out
Speaker 2: and says they don't have an air force left, they
Speaker 2: can't launch missiles anything, and then they launch a large
Speaker 2: missile strike that is very accurate. You know, they took
Speaker 2: out that radar facility. They took that out with one
Speaker 2: missile that was over a billion dollars and it was
Speaker 2: the central point of this distributed radar system that they
Speaker 2: have for their anti ballistic missiles. And you know, they
Speaker 2: have this massive radar system there that detects the missiles
Speaker 2: on launch, calculates their trajectory to try to intercept him.
Speaker 2: And of course the Iranians were able to take out
Speaker 2: that several of those installations, but primarily that one that
Speaker 2: had cost a billion dollars and it was central to
Speaker 2: the entire radar scheme that was there, and it's you know,
Speaker 2: what they have done is strategic. What we've done is
Speaker 2: we go in and we start bombing schools and stuff,
Speaker 2: because what is our strategy. Let's bomb the most number
Speaker 2: of places that we can. And it was actually I
Speaker 2: think it was General mcgre or, Colonel McGregor. I think
Speaker 2: it was Colonel McGregor who said that they or maybe
Speaker 2: it was maybe it was somebody else. They were talking
Speaker 2: about the targeting and the fact that the Air Force
Speaker 2: wanted to make it look like they could win wars
Speaker 2: just from the air, and so he said, when we
Speaker 2: went around, we actually evaluated. I don't think it was McGregor.
Speaker 2: I think it was Scott Ritter who said it, because
Speaker 2: he was one who was going around targeting and evaluating targets.
Speaker 2: He said, when he went around evaluating the targets, he said,
Speaker 2: I reported back to them, it's like you're not hitting
Speaker 2: anything out here, and that got them really upset and
Speaker 2: the Air Force ejected him out of the country. He said,
Speaker 2: So what they came up with was. They came up
Speaker 2: with a percentage. They said, well, we're going to assume
Speaker 2: that we're hitting x percentage of the you know, of
Speaker 2: all the bombing that we're doing, about x percentage of
Speaker 2: it is hitting something. And so we just do more
Speaker 2: bombing and we hit more targets. Right, that's the calculator.
Speaker 2: So they just applied that percentage to everything. So just
Speaker 2: you know, take it up to a thousand bombs and
Speaker 2: you know, now you've hit eight hundred targets or something
Speaker 2: like that. And he said that simply isn't true. So
Speaker 2: from the moment this war was kicked off, the Trump
Speaker 2: administration has been inconsistent in its measuring messaging. I've seen
Speaker 2: this from a lot of different sources. Just call it
Speaker 2: what it is, a lie. If you're not consistent with
Speaker 2: what's happening you're by to people, and if you're constantly
Speaker 2: changing your story, that is the hallmark of a liar. Well,
Speaker 2: this is the summary from the New American and they
Speaker 2: said for years, the president has communicated every day, at
Speaker 2: all hours of the day, it seems through social media.
Speaker 2: Perhaps the missed signals emanating from the White House are
Speaker 2: the manifestations of an impulsive and sometimes confused president trying
Speaker 2: to figure out in real time how to deal with
Speaker 2: this war, whether he's trying to calm the markets, restore
Speaker 2: trust in his plan which he doesn't have, or shame
Speaker 2: European allies into helping out. Maybe what we're seeing is
Speaker 2: a leader of the world quote unquote feeling his way
Speaker 2: around in his first major war. That's a very charitable
Speaker 2: way to put it. You know, maybe this guy he
Speaker 2: just doesn't know what he's doing, or you know, trust
Speaker 2: the plan. What plan? Tell me what the plan is? Right?
Speaker 2: They never had a plan. The plan was to get
Speaker 2: you to trust them that the plan. Trust was the plan.
Speaker 2: And while they're talking about this guy who is feeling
Speaker 2: his way around trying to figure out what's going on,
Speaker 2: that literally is folks, the blind leading the blind and
Speaker 2: speaking of somebody who is absolutely blind to the way
Speaker 2: that he has perceived Lindsey Graham and his pushing of
Speaker 2: this essentially suicidal attack on carg Island. And Ted Cruse
Speaker 2: wants to get involved in as well for Israel. He
Speaker 2: wants to show how loyal he is to Israel. So
Speaker 2: Ted Cruz had an interview and he said, I'm the
Speaker 2: one who told Trump to attack Iran. He's going to
Speaker 2: throw himself there for the Zionists, even though we had
Speaker 2: Rubio threw the grenade end and said, yeah, we did
Speaker 2: this war because Israel wanted to do the war, and
Speaker 2: so they kind of pushed us into this because we
Speaker 2: couldn't say no to them. I mean, who could say
Speaker 2: no to them? And so Ted Cruz comes in and
Speaker 2: throws himself on that hand grenade that Rubio unleashed when
Speaker 2: they went in there. So no American says the deranged
Speaker 2: war fantasies. That's a good way to put it of
Speaker 2: what Lindsay grahams is doing, the deranged war fantasies of Israel.
Speaker 2: First GOP Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. My money
Speaker 2: is always on the Marines. Maybe he's maybe he's the
Speaker 2: inside guy who's putting his money in polymarket as well
Speaker 2: as Brent Crude and the Dow Jones futures right. Who
Speaker 2: knows it could be any of these guys. Ted Cruz
Speaker 2: said that he was alone with Trump the day before
Speaker 2: the attack, so they flew with them and then rode
Speaker 2: with him in the presidential limo that they call the Beast.
Speaker 2: I would say, I wonder if that is they kind
Speaker 2: of owned themselves by calling it the beast, and they
Speaker 2: I wonder if it's got a mark on it, the
Speaker 2: mark of the beast. That's right there. So and Nancy Mace,
Speaker 2: who is also in South Carolina, came after Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 2: She said he needs to be removed from the situation room.
Speaker 2: I don't want to hear one word from a guy
Speaker 2: who has no kids, who's desperately sending our sons and
Speaker 2: daughters into war on the ground in Iran. Oh, by
Speaker 2: the way, I don't want to hear one word from
Speaker 2: Trump or bb either, because they don't send their kids
Speaker 2: into the war. Right. You got Netanyahu's kid is setting
Speaker 2: in Miami living it up, and Trump's baron is doing
Speaker 2: who knows what, and Ivy League schools. Lindsey Graham has
Speaker 2: one foreign policy, send somebody else's kids to war. He
Speaker 2: was wrong about Iraq, he was wrong about Afghanistan. Now
Speaker 2: he's wrong about Iran. That was Nancy Mayce saying that
Speaker 2: Lindsey grahamants American troops on the ground in Iran, not
Speaker 2: his kids, yours, not for freedom, but for the price
Speaker 2: of oil. Unless he is suiting up for carg Island himself.
Speaker 2: He should sit down, sendor Graham, why don't you deployed
Speaker 2: to Iran yourself if you're so eager to send everybody
Speaker 2: else over there. Yeah, get in the front line. You
Speaker 2: love war, Go do it. You and Sean Hennity. Graham
Speaker 2: isn't the only senator who pushed for Americans to die
Speaker 2: for oil and Israel. So did Ted Cruz, and he
Speaker 2: boasted about it. I urged the president to launch this attack.
Speaker 2: I was with him pretty much the entire day on
Speaker 2: Friday before the attack launched on Saturday. This is a
Speaker 2: guy who seems to have absolutely no political discernment, no
Speaker 2: biblical discernment either. You saw that in the interview that
Speaker 2: he had with Tucker Cralson. Tucker Carlson just skinned him alive,
Speaker 2: showed his ignorance, flight, his ignorance to the world. He said,
Speaker 2: when asked, he said, do you think we should negotiate
Speaker 2: with Iran? He says, well, I don't believe they're negotiating
Speaker 2: in good faith. They're liars. I think we were the
Speaker 2: ones who were not negotiating in good faith. I think
Speaker 2: we're the ones who engaged in treachery. The legal term
Speaker 2: is perfidy. We were not engaging negotiating it in good
Speaker 2: faith anyway. During his interview with Carlson, Cruz revealed he
Speaker 2: didn't even know any basic facts about Iran. How many
Speaker 2: people who live in Iran? By the way, Carlson asked, well,
Speaker 2: I don't know the population. Carlson said at all. He said, no,
Speaker 2: I don't know the population. If you don't know the
Speaker 2: population of the country, you seek to topple. And of
Speaker 2: course the other thing he doesn't know anything about. That's
Speaker 2: not anything about the topography either, which is maybe even
Speaker 2: more relevant. They got ninety two million people with places
Speaker 2: like a natural fortress. You don't know any of that.
Speaker 2: And by the way, you don't know who the leadership
Speaker 2: is either, And you don't know how they have structured
Speaker 2: this in terms of they knew they were going to
Speaker 2: have a decapitation strike. You don't know how they structured
Speaker 2: any that. You had absolutely no intelligence, and I mean
Speaker 2: that from the IQ standpoint, not just information. He had
Speaker 2: no intelligence at all going into this war. And that's
Speaker 2: what we have right now. We got the blind leading
Speaker 2: the blind.
Speaker 3: He doesn't know the territory.
Speaker 2: That's right. Go watch some music, man, you got another territory.
Speaker 2: He got another territory. Ignorant and arrogant. No idea of
Speaker 2: population size, no idea of the land area size, no
Speaker 2: idea of the topography, no idea of the government or
Speaker 2: military structure. They did not know who or what they
Speaker 2: were fighting. Quite obviously. Well, Reuters is coming out and
Speaker 2: saying that Trump approved the strikes after speaking with net Yahoo. Sorry, Teddy,
Speaker 2: you can't be the number one Zionis that goes to
Speaker 2: net Yahoo. So Trump blames Hegseth for the war. He says, Pete,
Speaker 2: I think you were the first one to speak up.
Speaker 2: You said let's do it. Well, you know it is.
Speaker 2: I think what does it tell you about ted Cruz
Speaker 2: would be so devoted to Zionism that he would put
Speaker 2: his neck in the noose on this losing effort of
Speaker 2: this wars ing I did that. I did that. You know,
Speaker 2: maybe they'll give him place to live along with the
Speaker 2: pedophiles that they give asylum to in in Israel. Who knows.
Speaker 2: But when we look at one Israeli and said, maybe
Speaker 2: this is why Annet, who is.
Speaker 11: After Natagna, who might be looking at this and saying,
Speaker 11: you know what, maybe we're losing America. Maybe this is
Speaker 11: ir of verus, and maybe I also recognize that America
Speaker 11: is not the America it used to be. America will
Speaker 11: not reassert primacy. We are headed to multipolarity.
Speaker 10: So you know what, as Israel, what I need to
Speaker 10: do is squeeze as.
Speaker 11: Much out of this America while I still can.
Speaker 10: So if I drag America into a war that's going
Speaker 10: to be really costly for that that might accelerate the
Speaker 10: loss of our support and also accelerate American decline. Well,
Speaker 10: if that war can fundamentally reshape the region and can
Speaker 10: help entrench my country's domination, then to hell with the
Speaker 10: consequences for America.
Speaker 11: This is worth it for us. And I just wonder
Speaker 11: whether that's in any way part of the calculation.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. The Machiavilian industrial complex. You know, the
Speaker 2: guy who do you think he'd be able doing that?
Speaker 2: The guy who thinks that Genghis Khan is greater than
Speaker 2: Jesus Christ, And he says, only the good guys lose.
Speaker 2: It's the evil guys who are going to win. Right,
Speaker 2: It's the evil people who are smart. Let's let's go
Speaker 2: with them. Netanyahu, determined to move forward with an operation
Speaker 2: that he has urged for decades, arguing that there might
Speaker 2: not ever be a better chance to kill company and
Speaker 2: to avenge previous Aranian efforts to assassinate Trump. Yeah, this
Speaker 2: is will never have a greater fool in office, will
Speaker 2: never have a better tool in office than Trump. Let's
Speaker 2: make sure we don't lose this advantage. And I think
Speaker 2: that's the real issue. Net Nahu going time and time
Speaker 2: again to the White House and saying, yeah, you got
Speaker 2: to get even they tried to kill you. That's yah
Speaker 2: who was pushing that out. And of course Joe Kent
Speaker 2: spoke to that as well and shot that down. Tucker
Speaker 2: is actually correct here, said Ken Silva. Attempts to blame
Speaker 2: Iran for the twenty twenty four actual attempts on Trump's
Speaker 2: life have largely come from Israel BB and his proxies
Speaker 2: like Mike Waltz. There are no IRGC assassins indicted. The
Speaker 2: FBI arrested some Pakistani guy and burned an informer in Iran,
Speaker 2: but they don't have any evidence of this. And so
Speaker 2: but that's now who tells them that it is a
Speaker 2: done deal? Well, there was an Ai satire quite frankly
Speaker 2: of the Iran Wars the movie and satire. They put
Speaker 2: all these different well known actors o. The voices haven't changed,
Speaker 2: but you'll recognize the people. And it's a pretty good
Speaker 2: summary of this pathetic movie so far.
Speaker 1: Sir, they're about to go nuclear. How long do we have.
Speaker 2: Li Liam Neeson as Donald Trump? They're two weeks away?
Speaker 1: How two weeks away?
Speaker 12: Are they even more two weeks away than they were
Speaker 12: five years ago?
Speaker 8: My god, that's dangerous levels of two weeks away?
Speaker 13: I know.
Speaker 8: So if anything happens to me, continue my work. We're
Speaker 8: only two weeks away. I will continue in show.
Speaker 11: Now I'll go to where no one can find me,
Speaker 11: my office on the third floor, right by that.
Speaker 8: Really big window.
Speaker 11: For the day, Sir, if we attack, they will close
Speaker 11: the straight of horse.
Speaker 8: They don't have the balls to close the straight of hormones.
Speaker 6: They just close the straight of hormones.
Speaker 8: And oil is now over one hundred dollars a barrel.
Speaker 8: Please keep me out of this.
Speaker 2: No one likes this war, and I want to be
Speaker 2: a president one day. Curious us peas, take your more uses,
Speaker 2: send a book or something.
Speaker 8: You're the most.
Speaker 2: Powerful military, curious army. A woman that was a test
Speaker 2: to you fell right into my trap.
Speaker 1: Sometimes the best reason for war.
Speaker 13: Is no reason at all.
Speaker 2: Iron War of the movie straight out of Horror Moves,
Speaker 2: that's what they called it. Reporter says, if the wars
Speaker 2: ending as you claimed, Donald Trump, do you still need
Speaker 2: two hundred billion dollars? Well, we It's always nice to have,
Speaker 2: isn't it? Said Trump? I say you what he came
Speaker 2: back with you. It's always nice to have two hundred
Speaker 2: billion dollars. That's what Americans would say when we see
Speaker 2: our tax bill. Yeah, twenty percent more than their record
Speaker 2: budget where they broke a trillion dollars for the first time.
Speaker 2: Then immediately they come back and they need another twenty percent.
Speaker 2: It's a very inflamed world, he said, and democrats inflame it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he changes the subject. That's Chris Minahan of Information Liberation
Speaker 2: tweeted that out. New York Times is now reporting that
Speaker 2: Trump is actively weighing will it you use US airborne
Speaker 2: troops to seize carg Island in a bloody suicide mission. Well,
Speaker 2: people who were with Trump in his first administration are
Speaker 2: speaking out, people like mad Dog Mattis, Jim Mattis, General Madis.
Speaker 2: You know, it's pretty bafetic when somebody like mad Dog
Speaker 2: Matis starts looking like the sane person in the room
Speaker 2: compared to warpeat, isn't it? What he had to say
Speaker 2: was he said in a jaw dropping reality check, Donald
Speaker 2: Trump's own former defense secretary just blew the whistle on
Speaker 2: the chaos unfolding in this reckless war. He says, it's
Speaker 2: worse than anyone thought. Jim Mattis didn't sugarcoated. He said,
Speaker 2: America is in a tough spot with not a lot
Speaker 2: of options. This war has spiraled into a strategic nightmare
Speaker 2: with no clear path forward. Even more alarming, he warned
Speaker 2: that if Trump abruptly ends the conflict now, it could
Speaker 2: hand control the Straight of Hormoz, one of the most
Speaker 2: critical oil checkpoints on Earth, straight to Iran again, where
Speaker 2: twenty percent of the world's oil flows through. That the
Speaker 2: result a potential global economic chokehold, where Iran could effectively
Speaker 2: tax international shipping and send prices skyrocketing. You know, there's
Speaker 2: another thing, and I want to talk to Gerald about this.
Speaker 2: When he joins us do we have him yet? Troes?
Speaker 2: But what they're trying to do Iran actually said, well,
Speaker 2: we'll let ships from China and another place say yeah,
Speaker 2: we'll let them through. But the he said, if you
Speaker 2: pay in Chinese you want, we'll let you through. Iran
Speaker 2: is actually trying to set up a Chinese counter to
Speaker 2: the US petro dollar, which has already failed a year
Speaker 2: or so ago. But they're trying to set up the
Speaker 2: Chinese currency now as the currency of trading in oil.
Speaker 2: So it's even bigger than the straight of her moves.
Speaker 2: These guys. If Trump is playing checkers, they're playing forty chess. Anyway,
Speaker 2: Trump launched a massive military escalation with no clear objective.
Speaker 2: Now he's pausing strikes after weeks of destruction. His own
Speaker 2: former Pentagon chief is admitting that there is no good outcome.
Speaker 2: He said, that's not strength, that's reckless improvisation with global consequences. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: all prices are swinging wildly, spiking their one hundred and
Speaker 2: twenty dollars a barrel before dropping again. Even after all
Speaker 2: the bombs dropped, Mattis says it hasn't achieved any meaningful
Speaker 2: strategic gains none. That's the same thing that Jerel McGregor
Speaker 2: said as a matter of fact.
Speaker 6: Meantime, the Iranians, who always knew this was coming just
Speaker 6: as I said it, many other people said it. Had
Speaker 6: spent the last twenty years putting together a way to
Speaker 6: survive it. And that has been their goal, to survive
Speaker 6: the inevitable onslaught of American military power.
Speaker 2: And they've done it.
Speaker 6: And not only have they survived it, but they've managed
Speaker 6: to strike back very decisively against their opponents, and they
Speaker 6: have punished everyone and anyone who worked with, supported, or
Speaker 6: cooperated with the United States and Israel. So right now,
Speaker 6: the Iranians, despite all of the damage that they've taken,
Speaker 6: and they have taken some substantial damage inside their country,
Speaker 6: is actually in a very strong position. We, on the
Speaker 6: other hand, that have made all these strident, ill advised
Speaker 6: demands and silly remarks, are sitting around trying to figure
Speaker 6: out what we are going to do next. We boast
Speaker 6: about destroying the Iranian air force, Well, the Iranians have
Speaker 6: not had an air force to speak of since the
Speaker 6: Shaw left. Just as insignificant and as far as the
Speaker 6: Navy is concerned, well, we sank the seven frigates that
Speaker 6: were the backboat of the navy. We're dealing with small boats,
Speaker 6: and we seem to think that that's a significant achievement.
Speaker 6: And I was listening to General Kine, the Chairman of
Speaker 6: the Joint Chiefs, read from what sounded like a spreadsheet
Speaker 6: from an accountant, and tell us about all the sorties
Speaker 6: that have been flown and all the thousands of places
Speaker 6: we've struck and drop bombs, as though this was a
Speaker 6: metric for success. We've learned nothing since nineteen sixty five
Speaker 6: we went through this in Vietnam. I remember as a
Speaker 6: young man listening in nineteen sixty nine, seventy seventy one
Speaker 6: to similar officers in uniform stand there and tell us, well,
Speaker 6: today we flew this many sorties, and we dropped these
Speaker 6: many bombs and this much tonnage. And the entire time
Speaker 6: we were doing this, we were losing the war. Nobody
Speaker 6: seemed to understand that until it was too late. I
Speaker 6: think now we are genuinely in a state of confusion,
Speaker 6: and I think that President Trump, as you point out,
Speaker 6: very definitely, is looking for an offering. The problem is
Speaker 6: no one's going to give it to it. He can't
Speaker 6: get it, and the Iranians are in no hurry to
Speaker 6: end this because they are winning.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So you saw the same thing from General Mattis
Speaker 2: retired General Matis is here from retired Colonel McGregor. What
Speaker 2: mattis is saying, no victory, no stability, no plan, just
Speaker 2: more uncertainty, higher costs, and a world pushed closer to
Speaker 2: to war. Retired General McMaster essentially was talking about World
Speaker 2: War three. He said, we've got the US government engaging
Speaker 2: Chinese and Russian ships in the Caspian Sea. He didn't
Speaker 2: even mention, I think what is brewing in Cuba. Well,
Speaker 2: you don't have a Cuban missile crisis, but we've got
Speaker 2: a Cuban oil crisis. There's a Russian tanker that appears
Speaker 2: to be ready to try to run the blockade of
Speaker 2: American ships trying to keep energy away from Cuba. There's
Speaker 2: no end to the insanity of this administration. The Trump
Speaker 2: regime is trying single handedly to push us into global
Speaker 2: depression and World War General. Isn't Iran's potential control of
Speaker 2: those state of horror moves?
Speaker 14: Wasn't that the most obvious card they had to play here?
Speaker 3: Why is it that it seems that the US was
Speaker 3: not prepared for.
Speaker 13: This, Well, Andre, we actually were prepared for it. I
Speaker 13: don't know where this narrative came out that it was
Speaker 13: a big surprise. I mean, you know, we do an
Speaker 13: annual exercise with up to thirty countries and about the
Speaker 13: closure of the state straight and form moves and how
Speaker 13: to reopen it. And so what you're seeing in the
Speaker 13: campaign now, and I think this is really important to understand,
Speaker 13: is a continuation of the joint you know, the combined
Speaker 13: force of the US and Israel prioritizing the missile and
Speaker 13: the drone capabilities, including their manufacturing capabilities, including their ability
Speaker 13: to reconstitute their missiles and drones with support from Russia
Speaker 13: and China. There are a couple of ships sailing right
Speaker 13: now with solid fuel from China. I don't think they're
Speaker 13: going to make it to Iran. And you saw the
Speaker 13: IDF in the last twenty four to forty eight hours
Speaker 13: striking ships in the Caspian Seat in the far north
Speaker 13: of Iran because Russia was smuggling dronesto into Iran to
Speaker 13: reconstitute their capabilities.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so it's happening eer. Meanwhile, Trump is out there
Speaker 2: pretending that he's talking to Ran the same I know
Speaker 2: what you're talking about. This is I've got to stop
Speaker 2: because we got drolled on the line I really want
Speaker 2: to talk to Jerald, but I wanted to show you
Speaker 2: the cartoon. This is This is a cartoon. Trump is
Speaker 2: on the couch at the psychiatrist's office, and he says,
Speaker 2: these Iranians that you've been talking to for two days,
Speaker 2: are they in the room with us?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: This is the craziest war. But people are dying and
Speaker 2: the economy is dying, and we're going to talk to
Speaker 2: Gerald slenty about that. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and he'll be right back. But before we do
Speaker 2: real quickly, let me think Wally war All was thank
Speaker 2: you very much for the tip. He says, My twenty
Speaker 2: two year old son went to m EPs yesterday and
Speaker 2: is choosing his mos here in the next few days
Speaker 2: against my better advice. I'm not sure what those acronyms are,
Speaker 2: but I'm guessing that that is military service related and
Speaker 2: I'm sorry to hear that. So again, we'll pray that
Speaker 2: he is okay with that. But we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
Speaker 2: Stay with us.
Speaker 13: Mm hm h m h.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: If you like the eagles on a dog doesn't way.
Speaker 1: The cars and Huey Lewis and the news.
Speaker 2: They say the horrors.
Speaker 4: You'll love the Classic Hits channel at AP Radio, download
Speaker 4: our app or listen now at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, Trendsjournal dot com. That's where you're going. You
Speaker 2: could have read about what is happening right now. You
Speaker 2: could have read about this a long time ago. Jerald
Speaker 2: Slinty knew what was happening, knew of the trends, and
Speaker 2: when we talk about timing and the rest of these things,
Speaker 2: the trends are absolutely undeniable. And he's been on top
Speaker 2: of this from the very beginning, and so when we
Speaker 2: look at where we are today, it's no surprise to Gerald.
Speaker 2: He's told us all of this. And so I want
Speaker 2: to talk to him about what's going on with gold
Speaker 2: because I'm a little bit surprised at what has happened
Speaker 2: with gold as well. So joining us now is Jeryl
Speaker 2: Slinty with Trendsjournal dot com. And by the way, if
Speaker 2: you want to be wise and subscribed to the information
Speaker 2: that Jeryl Slinty has, especially when we're living in such
Speaker 2: interesting and volatile times, will say, uh, you can save
Speaker 2: ten percent off with the code night at trendsjournal dot com.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining us.
Speaker 8: Jill, thank you, and by the way, with putting night
Speaker 8: in of course, you're the grand total of two dollars
Speaker 8: of fifty cents a week. Penny's at me and again
Speaker 8: we're giving with no there's no magazine. People could go
Speaker 8: to our YouTube, Gerald seld to your Trends Journal and
Speaker 8: you see the comments of the people that subscribe. We're
Speaker 8: not making this up. There's no Journalism's dead dead. Yeah.
Speaker 8: As a matter of fact, it was just going through
Speaker 8: some of the articles here Alex Springer agrees to five
Speaker 8: one hundred and seventy million pound takeover a telegraph media
Speaker 8: group Axels. Springer has agreed to buy Telegraph blah blah
Speaker 8: blah blah for the five hundred and seventy five million
Speaker 8: in an unexpected move. And they go on to say
Speaker 8: that the guy that's buying this thing is Daffner, DPH,
Speaker 8: dp F and e R. Now this is the Telegraph
Speaker 8: is a is a big newspaper in the UK. You're ready.
Speaker 8: At the end of the article over here, it says
Speaker 8: this Daphiner saying, quote, we support the right of existence
Speaker 8: of the state of Israel and oppose all forms of
Speaker 8: anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, it's any Semitism if you don't support Benjamin
Speaker 2: that Yahoo, that's right.
Speaker 8: Hey, hey, Daphna, come over here and you tell me
Speaker 8: that I'm an anti Semiti because I'm against genocide. I'm
Speaker 8: against the slaughter of Oh, according to Lancet, over one
Speaker 8: hundred thousand Palestinian people in Gaza. You got the nerve
Speaker 8: to call. Hey, that's to you. This is actual Springer.
Speaker 8: This is the biggest news agency in Germany that now
Speaker 8: is controlling the UK.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, that's right.
Speaker 8: Who just brought up a CBS.
Speaker 2: Yeah it was Ellison Elson Family prosionist.
Speaker 8: Huh yeah, not my language, there's yeah, would they bringing
Speaker 8: to on the show? Barry Weiss prosionist?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 8: Hey, did you hear the crap spewing out of headsets mouth?
Speaker 8: I went Defense secretary. Oh you mean a little clown
Speaker 8: boy that played a jerk on Fox before he got
Speaker 8: this job.
Speaker 2: Now he plays a jerk of the Pentagon.
Speaker 8: Yeah yeah, and what did he say? Oh he's happy
Speaker 8: that Ellison they may take over CNN. Yeah right, So anyway,
Speaker 8: we're giving people what they're not getting anywhere else. And
Speaker 8: I'm mentioning this because again when this is a T
Speaker 8: shirt I did when Bill Clinton ran for office back
Speaker 8: in nineteen ninety two. Mm hm, he deregulated the Federal
Speaker 8: Communications Act. In nineteen ninety six, there were thousands of
Speaker 8: independent radio stations, newspapers, magazines, TV stations, on and on.
Speaker 8: Now six companies control ninety two percent of the media.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, and we're going to wind up with one
Speaker 2: giant media ring to rule them all run by Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right. They're consolidating everything. You We're only going to
Speaker 2: have one. I remember a few years ago we were
Speaker 2: talking about look at this, We've got about a half
Speaker 2: dozen media companies. Now, well those half dozen media companies
Speaker 2: have been consolidating more and more. We're going to wind
Speaker 2: up literally with just one media company that's going to
Speaker 2: be the Ministry of Truth. Yeah.
Speaker 8: So, now going back to gold, this is where your
Speaker 8: trends journal economic update, and we go on to say
Speaker 8: this is before this is the day that Trump gave
Speaker 8: his State to the Union address. We had forecast in
Speaker 8: the magazine that by the weekend he would attack I
Speaker 8: did a podcast or Judge of Politano. Remember Trump does
Speaker 8: this on a Tuesday or Wednesday, I do with podcast
Speaker 8: is one coming up tonight with a judge, I say,
Speaker 8: is going to attack this weekend. Anyway, we go on
Speaker 8: to say that later on, we go on to save
Speaker 8: on the gold side. As a result of the US
Speaker 8: Israel attack in Iran over the weekend, golden spike. Remember
Speaker 8: they attack them on February twenty eighth.
Speaker 2: Saturday is Monday Saturday. And you've been saying for months
Speaker 2: it'll start, even before you got more specific about that
Speaker 2: particular Saturday, you've been saying it'll happen on a Saturday
Speaker 2: because they won't do it when the markets are closed.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 8: That's when he did it in June, and that's when
Speaker 8: he invaded events away which everybody forgot about, and kidnapped
Speaker 8: the president and his wife. Anyway, gold had spiked to
Speaker 8: five thousand, four hundred dollars an ounce on Monday, but
Speaker 8: then with a blink of an eye, when the equity
Speaker 8: markets opened in the US, prices fell some two hundred
Speaker 8: dollars an ounce, right like that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 8: Okay, Now let's go back to what just happened. When
Speaker 8: bs Trump last Saturday said I'm giving him forty eight
Speaker 8: hours forty eight hours in a day of door, I
Speaker 8: don't the door. We're going.
Speaker 2: A ride, right, yeah, right right, And it's not the
Speaker 2: Mid Eastern fire as well, because they promised that they
Speaker 2: would attack all the other infrastructure as well of all
Speaker 2: the other countries that they're So he was basically saying,
Speaker 2: forty eight hours before we set the Middle East on fire.
Speaker 8: And then what happens on Monday. Hey, I'm talking to them.
Speaker 2: We're talking to them.
Speaker 8: Let's make a deal. Prentiss, all right, it's the President's
Speaker 8: your reality show over. I can just do the TV show,
Speaker 8: so you listen to me. We've got a deal going
Speaker 8: on with them. One little prices fell eleven percent. Yeah,
Speaker 8: and what happened a couple of minutes before he did it?
Speaker 8: Very it's all the data is there? Oh, the Trump
Speaker 8: teams they don't know who did it. They bet what
Speaker 8: half a billion dollars?
Speaker 2: Well, I'm sure cash Mare telling tam BONDI, you're gonna
Speaker 2: find out who did it and prosecute them, don't you think?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, of course.
Speaker 8: It's rained now to make it a thousand percent clear.
Speaker 8: How the bangster gangster? Oh, by the way, what happened
Speaker 8: to the Epstein stuff?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 8: I forgot about that, all right?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Who says crime doesn't pay?
Speaker 8: Yeah? You ready? Why did the gold prices silver dive?
Speaker 8: And is what he wrote. Once upon a time, not
Speaker 8: too long ago. JP Morgan Chase was fined for rigging
Speaker 8: the precious metals markets. Here is what Reuters reported. So
Speaker 8: it's not out of my mouth. Wanted to put the
Speaker 8: clear from mainstream JP Morgan. This is September twenty ninth,
Speaker 8: twenty twenty. JP Morgan Chasing Company has agreed to pay
Speaker 8: more than nine hundred and twenty million dollars and admitted
Speaker 8: to wrongdoing to settle paraoh about probe into its trading
Speaker 8: of metal futures. They go on to say that the
Speaker 8: the bank for several years and marks a significant victory
Speaker 8: for the government's effort to clamp down on the illegal
Speaker 8: trading in the futures and precious metals market. They were
Speaker 8: rigging it.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah right, I'm sure, diamond.
Speaker 8: I'm some arrogant pieces scum reading your five ding one
Speaker 8: hundred and twenty million dollars. I don't go to jail. Hey,
Speaker 8: pull over, your back light was off, Get out of
Speaker 8: your car, stand on your head, repeat the alphabet backwards.
Speaker 8: Do you have anything to drink? You're going to jail
Speaker 8: all right? Yeah, you huse to the fullest for we,
Speaker 8: the people of slave Landia like scum beds, like pieces
Speaker 8: of did criminals that rigged the precious metals market. Hey,
Speaker 8: take it easy, so Lenty, I think we only got
Speaker 8: fined for what five felonies? JP Morgan Chase, that's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, when you look at this, Yeah, the house always
Speaker 2: wins with a casino, right, except when it's Trump's casinos
Speaker 2: and they go bankrupt. But the house always wins when
Speaker 2: it's Trump's White House because they can rig the markets.
Speaker 8: It's not only Trump, it's one after another.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 8: Oh, don't you forget about Hunter Biden. Yeah, a little
Speaker 8: coke addict drug deep screwed up, little piece of scump. Hey,
Speaker 8: I'm on the board of directors of Bruce Managing and
Speaker 8: you prayed right after.
Speaker 2: We over too the government the right, right, that's right.
Speaker 13: Oh?
Speaker 8: Who else got on that?
Speaker 15: Oh?
Speaker 8: Christopher Hines? Who you mean the Hines fifty seven? Oh yeah,
Speaker 8: you mean the step son in law of Carry the
Speaker 8: clown boy.
Speaker 2: Yeah you remember him? Oh yeah, Lurch yeah, John Kerry, Yeah.
Speaker 8: John Carry, I know a little. He's a scum. Yeah,
Speaker 8: and you know people are by the way, I'm getting
Speaker 8: blacklisted to all people say down, sir Lentie, we don't
Speaker 8: like your language. And you get so angry. Oh yeah,
Speaker 8: you wouldn't be angry if you're a Lebanese and a
Speaker 8: million of you got thrown out of your homes. Oh,
Speaker 8: you'd be very happy. Don't be angry. Oh you only
Speaker 8: killed over a thousand innocent people. Yeah, don't get angry neither.
Speaker 8: We got a clown, an arrogant line clown play president's
Speaker 8: of reality show telling three one hundred and forty three
Speaker 8: million people what to do. Oh, the president, you do
Speaker 8: what I tell you? Oh, I forgot Remember the COVID war.
Speaker 8: Heymandy Cuomo, My daddy was the governor before me. Close
Speaker 8: down your business, get back of your house. We got
Speaker 8: the COVID water fight, remember that.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 8: That's right, politician after a telling people what to do,
Speaker 8: and all the gutless people follow their leader. M hmm,
Speaker 8: we're still in kindergarten.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 8: Would I tell you I'm your teacher, it's time to
Speaker 8: take a nap. I'm not time to take a nap.
Speaker 2: That's right. I got a comment here from I got
Speaker 2: a comment here from a listener, Gerald that's for you, said, please,
Speaker 2: can you remind Gerald that Trump designated five hundred billion
Speaker 2: dollars to Ellison on his second day in office, this
Speaker 2: term supposedly for the deadly demonic mRNA. Frankenstein jabs that
Speaker 2: he used to buy TikTok and CBS. So yeah, in
Speaker 2: his very first act, he brings in Larry Ellison. Yep,
Speaker 2: and he's got these guys. His focus now is on
Speaker 2: not just the abomination of the mRNA bio weapons, but
Speaker 2: he also wants to merge that with artificial intelligence, and
Speaker 2: he does that on his very first day in office.
Speaker 2: You know, we're going to have AIS going to custom
Speaker 2: design to poison for each and every one of you.
Speaker 2: And so that's where we are with this guy. And
Speaker 2: when you look at what's happening with the AI stuff,
Speaker 2: it's truly frightening. Gerald. What the Trump White House as
Speaker 2: well as Senator Marsha Blackburn, who is going to be
Speaker 2: our next governor here in Tennessee, there's nobody even to
Speaker 2: challenge her. They're putting out this. They're going to get
Speaker 2: rid of any obstacles that anybody at the state or
Speaker 2: local level would put for artificial intelligence. And they want
Speaker 2: to fully weaponize and control it and centrally control it
Speaker 2: in Washington. And it's very frightening to see what these
Speaker 2: people are doing. It is the ultimate weapon. It is
Speaker 2: just like the m R and a stuff. It is
Speaker 2: a weapon against us.
Speaker 8: Oh yeah again, love it, hate it, want it, don't
Speaker 8: want it. AI is the future and the government's going
Speaker 8: to control more. And again we're talking about gold. They're
Speaker 8: going to go to central bank digital currencies. See you
Speaker 8: see again, we're writing the articles in the Trench Journal,
Speaker 8: how the Trump teams on all of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Oh, stable coins, don't you think that's the way they're
Speaker 2: going to do it. I mean, they've come out kind
Speaker 2: of their cover has been blown to some degree. Here
Speaker 2: in the United States and Europe, they don't even care.
Speaker 2: They still call it central banking digital currency. But here
Speaker 2: I think they're going to accomplish the same thing with
Speaker 2: the so called stable coins and tell everybody, oh, it's
Speaker 2: not central banking digital currency. Don't worry. It's not that
Speaker 2: when functionally there's no difference. Really, it's just that they're
Speaker 2: cutting themselves in on a big part of the profit
Speaker 2: rather than letting all the money be made by the
Speaker 2: Federal reserve.
Speaker 8: Yep. And again the Trump teams totally in it.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you this about what Iran is doing,
Speaker 2: because they've been playing it pretty smart in terms of
Speaker 2: not just the military stuff, but also the economic asymmetric warfare.
Speaker 2: One of the things that they're talking about doing is
Speaker 2: setting this thing up as a toll area, and they're
Speaker 2: going to charge people to go through. They're going to
Speaker 2: charge people, and you can go through if you pay
Speaker 2: in Chinese you want, And so it looks like they're
Speaker 2: trying to help the Chinese establish something similar to the
Speaker 2: petro dollar that we no longer have because we lost
Speaker 2: our part on that Saudi Arabia. So Iron wants to
Speaker 2: be the partner of China in terms of setting up
Speaker 2: a petro you wan looks like, what do you think.
Speaker 8: Well, it's only going to go so far with it.
Speaker 8: But again that they've had enough of it and the
Speaker 8: world is people are suffering from this. Here again, I
Speaker 8: just read to you the day that Trump went on
Speaker 8: the air about the State of the Union address. Because
Speaker 8: you elected me in most states, the price of guessoline,
Speaker 8: the gallant two dollars and thirty cents.
Speaker 2: Now you don't worry about it right now, we don't.
Speaker 2: Now we're not supposed to worry about it.
Speaker 8: Yeah, by the way, it was a lie. I looked
Speaker 8: it up. It was two dollars and ninety two cents. Now,
Speaker 8: what is it? I just went on the air before
Speaker 8: we went on triple A three dollars and ninety eight
Speaker 8: sense of gallon.
Speaker 2: Wow, that's the average average in America. And of course
Speaker 2: when it was when it was cheap, and he was
Speaker 2: bragging about it being cheap. He wasn't smart enough to
Speaker 2: fill up the strategic petroleum reserve gas tank before he
Speaker 2: goes to war in the Middle East and sets it
Speaker 2: on fire.
Speaker 8: He needs smart enough. What has he ever been smart
Speaker 8: enough doing?
Speaker 2: It's just it is when you when you go back
Speaker 2: and look at this, I mean, people are just going
Speaker 2: to be shaking their heads at the actions that he did,
Speaker 2: not even from a moral and a legal standpoint, but
Speaker 2: just from a pragmatic standpoint, what he's doing is so
Speaker 2: incredibly stupid. It's hilarious.
Speaker 8: Really, again, it's one lie after another. You're asking me
Speaker 8: why gold is going down and hasn't risen. They're lying.
Speaker 8: Remember that again, that little clown boy, Chris Right, Energy Secretary.
Speaker 8: Yeah quote Chris Wrong, a little jerk. Why lie right
Speaker 8: in front of everybody's eyes. We've got US naval forces
Speaker 8: bringing tankers, oil tankers through. The whole moves down goes
Speaker 8: oil prices a total line.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he must have overheard you must have overheard Trump
Speaker 2: talking about escorts and he thought he was actually talking
Speaker 2: about ships. We're talking about huggers in DC. But uh yeah,
Speaker 2: I've got a comment from one of our listeners here
Speaker 2: saying he talks to his relatives and they say they're
Speaker 2: maga people and they say, yeah, uh, you know, it's
Speaker 2: either it's we pay it now, we pay it later.
Speaker 2: He says, I'm so sick and tired of hearing this.
Speaker 2: They don't care what he does.
Speaker 8: You know, we hear this.
Speaker 2: This is a SoundBite that everybody's repeating. A short term pain,
Speaker 2: long term gain. This is going to be a long
Speaker 2: term pain. Absolutely, it's going to be long term.
Speaker 8: Yeah, this is an erna's targeted countries curse the blah
Speaker 8: blah blah blah. In response, US President Donald Trump claimed
Speaker 8: quote that many countries would send warships to the Strait
Speaker 8: to defend shipping in a post on truth social media, Truth,
Speaker 8: how about life social media? And that hopefully you ready, China, France, Japan,
Speaker 8: South Korea, Britain and others will send vessels. This is
Speaker 8: what he wrote.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Meanwhile, he won that quote the US, you ready, we'll
Speaker 8: be bombing the hell out of the shoreline, and one
Speaker 8: way or the other we will soon get the straight
Speaker 8: over moves open, safe and free.
Speaker 2: I bet Trump has never even seen a picture of
Speaker 2: the shoreline. He would be You wouldn't be thinking of
Speaker 2: sending troops in if you'd ever seen a picture of
Speaker 2: the topography that's there, the mountain ranges that are right
Speaker 2: there at the edge, and so forth. You know, there
Speaker 2: was Gerald. There was the guy who's a former highest
Speaker 2: ranking French official on NATO, and he was on a
Speaker 2: program in France and the guy was asking him, so
Speaker 2: are we gonna help Trump with straight off home moves?
Speaker 2: And he's like, not a chance, and he started giving reasons. So,
Speaker 2: first of all, the guy doesn't realize that if this
Speaker 2: is a NATO operation, it's a joint operation, and he
Speaker 2: needs to first of all tell us what his plans are,
Speaker 2: if he's got any. But he doesn't have any. So
Speaker 2: he says he's got, first of all, have some plans,
Speaker 2: and he's got to coordinate that with us so that
Speaker 2: we're not all doing our own thing and interfering with
Speaker 2: each other. He goes, he can't do any of that.
Speaker 2: He said, what he's doing is he's selling dance tickets
Speaker 2: on the Titanic capter. Its sorry, he hit the iceberg.
Speaker 2: And he said he's looking He's not looking for military assistance,
Speaker 2: He's looking for political assistance. That's really true. I thought
Speaker 2: it was very astute of the guy. He said, he's
Speaker 2: looking for political cover, not military cover.
Speaker 8: That's it.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Oh, by the way, you see the cover talking about
Speaker 8: the straight of her moves. Yeah's magazine.
Speaker 2: You got Trump in the boat. That's right. Show the cover,
Speaker 2: Travis if you can.
Speaker 8: Yeah, Washington cross the Delaware, will Trump will draft dodge
Speaker 8: of Trump. We said, I'm not afraid of anything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Washington cross of Delaware. Trump double crossed the US.
Speaker 2: That me.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and again this is an illegal, unconstitutional war.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 8: Again. You go back to a couple of weeks ago
Speaker 8: the Trends Journal cover. Why did Trump says, I I
Speaker 8: it was my opinion opinion that Iran was going to
Speaker 8: attack us. First your opinion, how about showing us the facts.
Speaker 8: I don't have to show you the facts. Again, this
Speaker 8: is the arrogance, not my language is there's a couple
Speaker 8: of weeks months, about a month ago, the New York
Speaker 8: Times asked if there were any limits to his global power.
Speaker 8: Mister Trump said, yeah, there's only one thing, my own morality,
Speaker 8: my own mind. It's the only thing that could stop me.
Speaker 8: You ready, I don't need international law.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: If I said that this guy, who the hell is
Speaker 8: he to say he doesn't need international law? Who hell
Speaker 8: is he to say only his own mind? That's right? Trump?
Speaker 8: I mean, how could he get away with this?
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's gonna be another No King's rally over the weekend,
Speaker 2: I think. But what you really need is no princes either,
Speaker 2: because all these bureaucrats. Just at the beginning of the show,
Speaker 2: I talked about how it's constantly one thing after the other.
Speaker 2: These people are banning. And I don't know if you
Speaker 2: saw this, Shet or not, Jerill, but they just announced
Speaker 2: that the FCC is going to ban most routers that
Speaker 2: are sold in the United States because they're not made
Speaker 2: in the United States. So they said, it's a security
Speaker 2: issue for people, and so yeah, it's a security issue
Speaker 2: because they want to be the ones that have the
Speaker 2: back door to your routers and that type of thing.
Speaker 2: But it's crazy just go through and they willing nilly
Speaker 2: ban whatever they wish. What gives them the right to
Speaker 2: do that? Where do we even have the authority for
Speaker 2: the FCC to even exist?
Speaker 8: We have we have trying to say, we go up
Speaker 8: clowns telling us what to do, on and on and
Speaker 8: on again. We'll look at the COVID war. Oh that
Speaker 8: Trump launched, by the way, on what we taught this
Speaker 8: a thousand times on March thirteenth, Black Friday, twenty twenty,
Speaker 8: state of emergency and then sold the operation warp speed,
Speaker 8: jab operation warp speed. How warped could you be to swamp?
Speaker 8: Why I believe in him? Yeah again your trends journal
Speaker 8: again this is.
Speaker 2: Again with warp speed for the slow thinkers.
Speaker 8: Yeah again lies lie prices have risen to nearly one
Speaker 8: hundred and twenty dollars I mentioned this. This is from
Speaker 8: the Trenchs Journal late Sunday, after Ron started striking oil
Speaker 8: tankers traversing the Straits of muz in a rock and
Speaker 8: Kuwait where they shut down oil production. Again, lies, lies,
Speaker 8: and moralize spewed out by Trump and his gang to
Speaker 8: do what they can to rig the equities and commodities
Speaker 8: markets for all to see. Therefore, except therefore, except the
Speaker 8: lies keep coming with truth will be untold. With major
Speaker 8: concerns that oil markets are being rigged by Washington. Yesterday,
Speaker 8: Treasury Secretary Scott Desson told CNBC that the administration had
Speaker 8: no plans to intervene in financial markets and may not
Speaker 8: have the authority to do so even if it wanted. Yeah,
Speaker 8: we write no plans. Does that mean the plans could change?
Speaker 8: How about saying we would never do anything like that?
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, that's right. Yeah, we haven't done that.
Speaker 8: Do not have the authority? How about you don't have
Speaker 8: the authority?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 8: And what again? Look what just happened when Trump said
Speaker 8: that I figured forty eight hours, give five more days. Yeah,
Speaker 8: and they all of a sudden, half a billion dollars
Speaker 8: just short the markets. Yeah, and a half of everybody's eyes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one and a half billion. Yeah, that's right. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, certainly they're manipulating the markets. We've talked about
Speaker 2: this in the past. What about some other assets, other
Speaker 2: issues as well. I think that there's a lot of
Speaker 2: people who are looking at oil and thinking, yeah, this
Speaker 2: is going to be a surefire double in just a
Speaker 2: couple of months. So maybe they may be pulling some
Speaker 2: money out of the gold holdings that they've got to
Speaker 2: put it into oil. Another thing I want to get
Speaker 2: your take on, what about the golf states. I mean,
Speaker 2: these guys are seeing their income being blown up and
Speaker 2: blocked off, and so I think there's a lot of
Speaker 2: golf states out that need some liquidity. They might be
Speaker 2: selling their massive holdings in gold as well. What do
Speaker 2: you think about that.
Speaker 8: That's very true, and they are selling. And not only that,
Speaker 8: a lot of people that are playing all markets will
Speaker 8: play the stock markets and the stocks book again again,
Speaker 8: we wrote in the Trends Journal magazine before Trump gave
Speaker 8: a State of the Union address, we had all the
Speaker 8: polled at it in there and we said, this thing's
Speaker 8: going down. When all those fails, they take you to war.
Speaker 2: Yep, that's right.
Speaker 8: What happened was when the markets were going down before
Speaker 8: this again we call the dot com bust, and you're
Speaker 8: seeing you're seeing what's going on with the private equity groups.
Speaker 8: They can't Paula one after another? What did movies just
Speaker 8: downgraded KKR really chunk to jug.
Speaker 2: Well, that's David Petraeus where he hangs out.
Speaker 14: You got it?
Speaker 8: No, no, no, you didn't say his name right, it's
Speaker 8: David betrayed us.
Speaker 2: He did absolutely dead And of course the Kravitz guy
Speaker 2: or whatever and uh betray us. Regulars at the Builderberg
Speaker 2: conference always there. That's truly amazing. Well, you, gold has
Speaker 2: been a safe haven, and I think that's why a
Speaker 2: lot of people are surprised that we had a bad week.
Speaker 2: Is like the worst week that had in forty three
Speaker 2: years in terms of gold going down. Of course, it's
Speaker 2: still up over the you know, over the last couple
Speaker 2: of months, over the last year, up significantly. All of
Speaker 2: the fundamental stuff that is there in terms of long
Speaker 2: term perspective are still there and even stronger. And so
Speaker 2: when I look at it, I see gold as being
Speaker 2: on sale. I don't know what you see when you
Speaker 2: look at it. Hello, do we lose Gerald? I guess
Speaker 2: we did. Okay, Well on that cliffhanger. We'll try to
Speaker 2: re establish contact with him. But that's the way I
Speaker 2: see it. When you look at all the different things
Speaker 2: that are happening. Is the is the American problem with
Speaker 2: debt and inflation? Is that better now that we've got
Speaker 2: a war, or is that worse? You know, all the
Speaker 2: things that have put us there, all of these different
Speaker 2: factors have gotten much worse. And so again, I just
Speaker 2: look at situations like this. The markets play everything for
Speaker 2: the short term. They run on a on rumor and
Speaker 2: somebody points to something and they all dash to that
Speaker 2: particular thing, and then they react to the reality. It
Speaker 2: takes some very long time to react to the reality
Speaker 2: of it. If you go back and you look at
Speaker 2: what happened with gold during the Opek crisis. Even with
Speaker 2: price of oil, it took a while for people to
Speaker 2: adjust to the reality of it, going back to the
Speaker 2: OPEQ nineteen seventy three oil embargo. Now with this Trump
Speaker 2: oil embargo, it's taking people a while to get their
Speaker 2: head around where this stuff is happening. The long term.
Speaker 2: You're not going to see long term trends in the marketplace.
Speaker 2: They're going to react to what is happening immediately. It's
Speaker 2: like if you remember up where they had the device
Speaker 2: where the dogs, you could hear what the dogs were
Speaker 2: thinking verbalized it and they'd be talking about something and
Speaker 2: then all the sudden squirrel. You know, that is the
Speaker 2: stock market, that is the commodity market. And you got
Speaker 2: a lot of people, as Jeryld was saying, they're playing
Speaker 2: it in terms of timing, and so they're going to
Speaker 2: jump from gold into oil or whatever, and they're going
Speaker 2: to and again there's a lot of really big sovereign
Speaker 2: holders in the Gulf States. They've got to be looking
Speaker 2: at this and saying, what are we going to do
Speaker 2: in terms of liquid income in order to keep ourselves
Speaker 2: afloat here, They've got to liquidate gold right now. And
Speaker 2: I think that's what we're seeing right now, a lot
Speaker 2: of selling pressure on that. Well, we're still trying to
Speaker 2: get Jill Slenty on but as I look at that again,
Speaker 2: go to David Knight dot gold and they'll take you
Speaker 2: to Tony Rban and he can help you get some
Speaker 2: physical gold and silver, not the tokenized stuff, not the
Speaker 2: paper stuff either. Don't settle for substitutes. Get the real thing.
Speaker 2: Get the real thing that you have physical possession of.
Speaker 2: That's where the real gold value is. Having physical possession
Speaker 2: is as good as gold. And there isn't anything that
Speaker 2: is going to be as good as that. That is
Speaker 2: going to be a token or a share in some
Speaker 2: kind of a fund that is there. While we're waiting
Speaker 2: for Gerald to come on, I want to get back
Speaker 2: to what we're talking about with the war. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, let's go back to here. It is
Speaker 2: right here, this is where I left off, just talking
Speaker 2: about Trump and his idea that he is. They're supposedly
Speaker 2: talking to these people, and yet there's no evidence that
Speaker 2: he's talking to them. He is still out there boasting
Speaker 2: about what he's doing. As a matter of.
Speaker 15: Fact, we've won this with this war has been won.
Speaker 15: The only one that likes to keep it going is
Speaker 15: the fake news. I mean the New York Times. You
Speaker 15: read the New York Times. It's like, we're not winning
Speaker 15: a war where they have no navy and they have
Speaker 15: no air force and they have no nothing, and we
Speaker 15: literally have planes flying over Tehran and other parts of
Speaker 15: their country. They can't do a thing about it. For instance,
Speaker 15: if I want to take down that power plant, that
Speaker 15: very big powerful power plant, they can't do a thing
Speaker 15: about it. It's like take me, that's all they can do.
Speaker 15: And yet if you read the New York Times or
Speaker 15: if you watch ABC fake news or NBC fake news,
Speaker 15: you'd say it's a close battle.
Speaker 2: It's not a close battle. Well, there's not anybody that
Speaker 2: says that the US is winning except for Ben Shapiro,
Speaker 2: and he is nothing other than a Zionist propagandist. Nobody
Speaker 2: questions that as well as a matter of fact, within
Speaker 2: Trump's administration, one of the reasons that he may genuinely
Speaker 2: believe that he's winning because he's surrounded by sycophants and psychopaths.
Speaker 2: Look at this interplay here with You've got Steven Miller,
Speaker 2: who is just falling all over himself flattering Trump and
Speaker 2: praising Trump. And then Trump turns to let's see, who's
Speaker 2: the other person that was there. He turns to the
Speaker 2: next guy, and he said, cash Betel, I think it was.
Speaker 2: He says, can you do better than that? And he
Speaker 2: tries his best.
Speaker 14: Work that President Trump is doing not only in Memphis,
Speaker 14: not only in Washington, d C. But all over the country. Ultimately,
Speaker 14: it will save and is saving tens of thousands of
Speaker 14: American lives. It is I'll use that word again. What
Speaker 14: President Trump has done on bord of security and public
Speaker 14: safety is a national miracle that will be studied not
Speaker 14: only for generations, but for centuries to come.
Speaker 2: Thank you, President Trump and Steve. Yeah, it will be
Speaker 2: studied for centuries to come, but not for the reasons
Speaker 2: he said.
Speaker 8: Okay, see if you can tup that.
Speaker 2: Come on tough, get with a sycophancy, right, you know,
Speaker 2: as the president.
Speaker 12: As I look around this venue, I see and I'm
Speaker 12: reminded again why we have the greatest warriors on God's
Speaker 12: green earth, the men and women's serving in uniform, the
Speaker 12: men and women serving and wearing the badge, and law enforcement,
Speaker 12: our police are sheriffs around the state of Tennessee. I'm
Speaker 12: reminded that Americans exist to protect this country day in
Speaker 12: and day out, and they've done it like we've done
Speaker 12: it here. But what we didn't have was you. We
Speaker 12: didn't have a commander in chief who backed the blue,
Speaker 12: who resourced the blue, who funded the military, who did
Speaker 12: whatever it takes to safeguard every single life. And here
Speaker 12: in Memphis, Tennessee, you have put on a show.
Speaker 6: For the world.
Speaker 2: You have allowed us to go in and put on
Speaker 2: a show.
Speaker 12: Gang bangers, rapists, murderers, drug dealers at record historic levels.
Speaker 12: And first, not Withstein, the American kid parents letter genocide
Speaker 12: in East Africa to become the ninth director of the FBI.
Speaker 12: I'm living the wildest dream you could possibly imagine, sir.
Speaker 12: But it's thanks to you. But more importantly, what I
Speaker 12: see when I look out across for our great partners
Speaker 12: here in the Inner Agency, and our great legislators, and
Speaker 12: our great prosecutors, and our great Attorney General who has
Speaker 12: the guts to go out there and make arrest tournament
Speaker 12: to prosecutions and put people in prison. You are giving
Speaker 12: that dream to every single child in the state of Tennessee.
Speaker 12: You are inspiring the nation and law enforcement to come
Speaker 12: up and wear the badge and where the colors of
Speaker 12: this country and safeguard our men and women for generations
Speaker 12: to come.
Speaker 2: That's right, this is the dream. He's living the dream,
Speaker 2: this little flat boy. And you too can grow up
Speaker 2: and become the director of the FBI and take planes
Speaker 2: around the world, go play golf in Scotland and take
Speaker 2: your girlfriend across the country and go to the hockey
Speaker 2: game at the Olympics and get drunk and all the
Speaker 2: rest of you too can live the dream. That's what
Speaker 2: this is all about. That's why these people are such
Speaker 2: sycophants to him because of what they're getting out of this.
Speaker 2: And of course, when Trump is talking about how he's winning,
Speaker 2: the headline from Daily Mail is Trump claims Iron agreed
Speaker 2: to give up their nukes. As his war chief Pete fumes,
Speaker 2: and Trump says he didn't want it to be settled.
Speaker 2: He said, Pete didn't want this whole thing to be settled.
Speaker 2: And we noticed that. We noticed that this guy is
Speaker 2: literally trying to embrace the values of being a terrorist.
Speaker 3: With and destroy the enemy as viciously as possible from
Speaker 3: moment one.
Speaker 8: And that's why we see ourselves as part of this
Speaker 8: negotiation as well. We negotiate with bombs.
Speaker 2: You have a choice.
Speaker 3: As we loiter the top of Tehran, as President talked
Speaker 3: about about your future, President has made it clear that
Speaker 3: you will not have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 8: The War Department agrees. Our job is to ensure that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's it. As a matter of fact, you had
Speaker 2: a retired military another retired military talking about Warpete say,
Speaker 2: this guy is just pushing it into war crimes and
Speaker 2: he's endangering our own people as well.
Speaker 8: We also don't fight with stupid rules of engagement. We
Speaker 8: untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, de moralize, hunt,
Speaker 8: and kill the enemies of our country.
Speaker 16: Those are the words of a potential war criminal.
Speaker 2: The s retired major general.
Speaker 16: And that is not the advice and council and direction
Speaker 16: that any Secretary of Defense should be providing soldiers sailor's
Speaker 16: herman marines. It puts them actually in greater danger. The
Speaker 16: Secretary of Defense is a disgraced major that was kicked
Speaker 16: out of the DC National Guard. He has no qualifications
Speaker 16: whatsoever to be the Secretary of Defense other than his
Speaker 16: extreme loyalty to the president. Again, those are the words
Speaker 16: of a potential war criminal.
Speaker 2: And again it's you knows no credentials except for his
Speaker 2: extreme loyalty to the president. Could say, he's saying they're right,
Speaker 2: Cash Betel and Dan Bongino, d Bondi and the rest
Speaker 2: of them. And I think we've got Jeryl Slenty back
Speaker 2: with this. Gerald, are you there, I'm back.
Speaker 8: Yeah. We had a little problem with the internet.
Speaker 2: Here, Okay, great, great, all right, So before I was
Speaker 2: telling you.
Speaker 8: The equity markets are going down, going back to gold.
Speaker 8: A lot of people, you know, to play the gold markets,
Speaker 8: doing the futures markets, et cetera. They're losing money, so
Speaker 8: they had to pull it out of there. That's what
Speaker 8: brought down a lot of the prices, that's.
Speaker 2: Right, They got to cover their positions.
Speaker 8: Yeah, and then they're selling the lie that because the
Speaker 8: United States, the dollars go going up, so that means
Speaker 8: it's more safe to buy treasuries, et cetera because the
Speaker 8: strength of the dollar. That's a lot of blowning. Did
Speaker 8: you see the article that came out in Fortune that's
Speaker 8: showing that the real debt to GDP level in the
Speaker 8: United States, the real debt level in the United States
Speaker 8: is one hundred and what forty three trillion, not thirty
Speaker 8: nine trillion or thirty eight trillion.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, the unfounded liability it is like social security,
Speaker 2: right exactly. Yeah.
Speaker 8: So going back to Trump, you know, it's what there
Speaker 8: were just a gentleman was just saying about Hexit. This
Speaker 8: is March fourth. Remember the war begins on February twenty eighth,
Speaker 8: so what three four days later he goes they are toast.
Speaker 8: They know it or they will know it soon enough. Yeah, right,
Speaker 8: you ready, this is him. Iran senior leaders are dead.
Speaker 8: The so called governing council that would have selected successors.
Speaker 8: Hexait added are dead, missing, and cowering in bunkers, too
Speaker 8: terrified to even occupy the same room. Iron officials cannot
Speaker 8: talk or communicate, let alone mount coordinated sustained offensive. That
Speaker 8: was uch fourth.
Speaker 2: As soon as he says stuff like that, they immediately
Speaker 2: released a massive barrage against other people. You know, we've
Speaker 2: taken out all their missile launchers. And then they see
Speaker 2: he said, it's so obvious that he's lined everybody about it.
Speaker 8: Yep.
Speaker 2: And it's really Trump is one who's toast and he's
Speaker 2: constantly being buttered up on both sides by these sick
Speaker 2: offense that he's put around himself.
Speaker 8: Yah. Again, this is going back before. Yeah, President Trump
Speaker 8: said there would be no deal to end the US
Speaker 8: war against Iran without your ready, unconditional surrender. That's what
Speaker 8: he was saying before. This is a quote on what
Speaker 8: they call truth social life social quote. After that, and
Speaker 8: the selection of a great and acceptable all in Capital's leader,
Speaker 8: we and many of our wonderful and very brave allies
Speaker 8: and partners will work tirelessly to bring Ran back from
Speaker 8: the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and
Speaker 8: stronger than ever before. It's kind of crappy.
Speaker 1: Rights.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it's so full of boasting and bragging and
Speaker 2: it is so empty. It's so tiresome. I think, what
Speaker 2: is going to happen? And I'm really concerned because I
Speaker 2: think the Democrats can pretty much run the most radical
Speaker 2: people on the left and get elected. This as the
Speaker 2: thing is going to drag on along. So we're going
Speaker 2: to get whipsad to the other side of this thing,
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 8: Yep. Yeah, Treasure going back chosen Trump boaster on Tuesday,
Speaker 8: the US strikes quote had knocked out most of Iran's military. Unbelievable. Yeah,
Speaker 8: it's just one lay after another, that's right. Yeah, remember
Speaker 8: this one March fourth Trump, any potential next leader of
Speaker 8: Iran you ready just ends up dead.
Speaker 14: Well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's the thing that really discussed me too,
Speaker 2: is war Pete Hegseth justide that clip I was playing.
Speaker 2: The guy says, you know, this is not only a
Speaker 2: war crime, but it is also making it more dangerous
Speaker 2: for our own soldiers. Right, if you're going to kill
Speaker 2: everybody when you capture them, rather than giving them humane
Speaker 2: treatment as we've all agreed to do, you want to
Speaker 2: go to total unlimited war. You're going to machine gun
Speaker 2: people in the water. And this goes back to before
Speaker 2: the Iran situation. This goes back to their other war
Speaker 2: of aggression against Venezuela and attacking people that were no
Speaker 2: threat to them and then going around. Even if you
Speaker 2: didn't kill them, you circle back around and murder them
Speaker 2: as they're shipwrecked. This has always been considered to be
Speaker 2: a war crime, and I think it's going to be
Speaker 2: kind of interesting to see some of these people get
Speaker 2: some criminal referrals to the international criminal Court. Not that
Speaker 2: they'll necessarily get there because net and Yahoo's got one,
Speaker 2: but he hasn't had to stand before them. But they
Speaker 2: did get du Terte out of the Philippines. He was
Speaker 2: the guy that was a big hero to Trump because
Speaker 2: he was shooting people on the streets if he just
Speaker 2: thought that they were a drug dealer. And so now
Speaker 2: he's answering to an international criminal court. He's in the docket.
Speaker 2: He will probably go to jail for that, but I
Speaker 2: have to wait and see if people get upset enough
Speaker 2: with Trump, they might hand them over who knows.
Speaker 8: Again, to imagine, drug dealers had nothing to do with that.
Speaker 8: It was stealing their oyal, that's right, that's right. They
Speaker 8: lied about this drug dealing crap. By the way, they
Speaker 8: killed a couple of people last week and both two.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 8: But again, as I said, you think we would evaded
Speaker 8: a rock Syria and Libya if the major export.
Speaker 2: Was broccoli, That's right, absolutely right.
Speaker 8: It's a safety with Venezuela. Again. My book trend Tracking
Speaker 8: boll better than Mega trends Time Magazine. I write about
Speaker 8: how I became a trend forecaster, and it's right here,
Speaker 8: youran conflict right here, it's nineteen seventy eight, seventy nine.
Speaker 8: People had no idea the United States overthrow the democratically
Speaker 8: elected government of Mohammed Mozadega in nineteen fifty three because
Speaker 8: you had the nerve to say that the oil in
Speaker 8: Iran belonged to the Iranian people.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm so tired of hearing this forty seven year
Speaker 2: I'm so tired of hearing this forty seven year thing.
Speaker 2: People don't understand anything at all about that. It's a
Speaker 2: great article by the way from David Stockman who said
Speaker 2: I was there in Reagan administration, I understand what we
Speaker 2: were doing to Iran then as well, and he talks
Speaker 2: about it. Thank you so much for joining us. Gerald
Speaker 2: Clenty Trendsjournal dot com. If you use a code night
Speaker 2: you can save ten percent off. And it is an
Speaker 2: amazing publication weekly and as Gerald points out, it's only
Speaker 2: a little over two dollars a week if you have
Speaker 2: that ten percent off. Thank you for joining us, Jeral.
Speaker 8: Thank you for everything you're doing. Thank you having me.
Speaker 2: Thank you the common Man. They created common Core and
Speaker 2: dumbed down our children. They created Common Past to track
Speaker 2: and control us. They're Commons project to make sure the
Speaker 2: commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the
Speaker 2: common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us
Speaker 2: has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 8: That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desired an know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 2: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 2: at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 2: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 2: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com