WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, I said, as a Protestant, and I'm looking

2
00:00:01.560 --> 00:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>into the Orthodox Faith because I finally looked into early

3
00:00:04.559 --> 00:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Church history and solve my beliefs like fold before my eyes.

4
00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So how many chack right now?

5
00:00:10.199 --> 00:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of want to ask real quick, if

6
00:00:13.640 --> 00:00:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you can start all over in your journey and learn

7
00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox faith, what would you do from the very beginning.

8
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to go on like a long like

9
00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like right away read the Early Church father.

10
00:00:24.399 --> 00:00:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Or just take my time and not rush into it.

11
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Start by reading Athanacius, start by reading the Church Fathers gradually,

12
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>just take your time. Lull lull topic. The reason that

13
00:00:39.039 --> 00:00:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the Orthodox Church does not strictly identify Catholicity with universality.

14
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm well aware that that's what the word means is

15
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>because of the fact that you can have the fullness

16
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:55.359
<v Speaker 3>of the faith, as Ignacious talks about in his epistles

17
00:00:55.399 --> 00:00:58.719
<v Speaker 3>at the local church. That's why. And because it's not

18
00:00:58.880 --> 00:01:01.479
<v Speaker 3>an issue of numbers. And it's very important to stress

19
00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:03.759
<v Speaker 3>that because many times in the history of the Church,

20
00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the true believers were reduced in numbers. Okay, any Orthodox

21
00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:12.719
<v Speaker 3>theology book that you read will discuss this. In contrast

22
00:01:12.760 --> 00:01:17.719
<v Speaker 3>to the Roman Catholic notion that it's essentially identified with universality.

23
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:20.480
<v Speaker 3>And the reason we'd say that is because Roman Catholics

24
00:01:20.480 --> 00:01:22.599
<v Speaker 3>always say you need the four marks of the Church,

25
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:26.599
<v Speaker 3>and because Orthodox don't have Catholicity in terms of numbers,

26
00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:30.799
<v Speaker 3>they're not the true church. It's a stupid argument. That's

27
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:34.239
<v Speaker 3>why I said that. I knew since I was eighteen

28
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:37.799
<v Speaker 3>that the word Catholic means universal. Come on, go ahead, man,

29
00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:48.599
<v Speaker 3>what's up? No, yep.

30
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I had a bunch of good questions for you. But

31
00:01:52.560 --> 00:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>now after those okay, retarded people coming in talking about

32
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>kinditive dissonance towards you, is I lost my train of thought.

33
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:04.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, hold on a second, think about it for a second.

34
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Victoria loves Haesus ten bucks. Most Protestants are taught that

35
00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:11.639
<v Speaker 3>Catholicism is fake, and all the churches I grew up

36
00:02:11.639 --> 00:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>in nobody really knew anything about Orthodoxy. So I'm excited

37
00:02:15.560 --> 00:02:18.800
<v Speaker 3>to learn more. Well, welcome, take your time and hear

38
00:02:18.919 --> 00:02:22.199
<v Speaker 3>the things out. Don't get triggered. Cole Marshall five dollars.

39
00:02:22.439 --> 00:02:27.479
<v Speaker 3>What is the right of interpretation? The Protestants proposed a

40
00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 3>doctrine of individual freedom of conscience and write a private interpretation,

41
00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>that no one could bind you to their interpretation of scriptures.

42
00:02:38.680 --> 00:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>You see. So they were chiefly arguing against the Roman

43
00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:47.159
<v Speaker 3>Catholic papal system, which was always arguing against them that

44
00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:51.159
<v Speaker 3>you need the papacy, you don't have authority. The Protestants said,

45
00:02:51.199 --> 00:02:54.639
<v Speaker 3>I have my own conscience, don't care about your your

46
00:02:54.680 --> 00:02:58.759
<v Speaker 3>pope binding me to your interpretations. So the Protestants came

47
00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:02.759
<v Speaker 3>up with the right of private interpretation. This is one

48
00:03:02.759 --> 00:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of their hallmark Classic Reformation doctrines. Boomer Slayer, fifty bucks.

49
00:03:09.800 --> 00:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I went to church for the first time ever last Sunday.

50
00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Whoa dude, hope what it was? An Orthodox church? I

51
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>planned to keep going. Thank you awesome name, and I'm

52
00:03:18.560 --> 00:03:22.759
<v Speaker 3>glad that you made it. Steve Grady twenty bucks. I'm

53
00:03:22.759 --> 00:03:26.639
<v Speaker 3>researching Orthodoxy, but I wondered if Orthodoxy has old new

54
00:03:26.639 --> 00:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>calendar issue. I mean that's a very minor I mean,

55
00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:33.319
<v Speaker 3>just find a good ro Corps Serbian Antiochian church. Don't

56
00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:38.439
<v Speaker 3>worry about that kind of stuff. Yet, Is it an

57
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:41.599
<v Speaker 3>example of Orthodox clergy making up innovations? Well, I think

58
00:03:41.639 --> 00:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that the calendar issue was in a way of innovation,

59
00:03:48.039 --> 00:03:51.439
<v Speaker 3>but I don't know that I wouldn't like in that

60
00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:56.319
<v Speaker 3>to Protestantism is way more extreme than something like that.

61
00:03:56.479 --> 00:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>David James Flood two memberships. The Gentleman that asked about

62
00:04:03.039 --> 00:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>tag questions should read Father deacon Ni's papers, Yes, definitely,

63
00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:09.919
<v Speaker 3>but those come up in the old videos. By the way,

64
00:04:12.400 --> 00:04:13.039
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, RCI.

65
00:04:14.080 --> 00:04:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks, I'm gonna try to fly through some of

66
00:04:16.279 --> 00:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>this one being not on topic of any debate stuff.

67
00:04:19.720 --> 00:04:23.519
<v Speaker 2>But are you only open for debates or do you

68
00:04:23.639 --> 00:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>also do like interviews and stuff too?

69
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:28.839
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean interviews?

70
00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Like if you came in a podcast and we're talking

71
00:04:31.319 --> 00:04:33.439
<v Speaker 2>about the Eastern Orthodoxy and stuff like that.

72
00:04:34.959 --> 00:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean I have done that on many It depends

73
00:04:37.160 --> 00:04:39.839
<v Speaker 3>on the podcasts. So what are you who's talking?

74
00:04:40.879 --> 00:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. There's a couple of Catholic ones out

75
00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>there that would love to have you on and get

76
00:04:45.279 --> 00:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you on.

77
00:04:46.199 --> 00:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Catholic ones want it. Why would a Catholic want me

78
00:04:48.279 --> 00:04:49.519
<v Speaker 3>on their podcast? Dude?

79
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I think you have a lot of good stuff to say.

80
00:04:52.360 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I disagree with it, obviously, but I think there's a

81
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions out there, Like I've watched, I have a.

82
00:04:58.839 --> 00:05:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Lot of good stuff to say. I disagree with it.

83
00:05:02.519 --> 00:05:04.600
<v Speaker 3>How is it good. If you disagree with that the first, then.

84
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:08.199
<v Speaker 2>You can't have good arguments and disagree with it. Everything

85
00:05:08.240 --> 00:05:08.759
<v Speaker 2>has to be shit.

86
00:05:11.439 --> 00:05:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Like what podcasts.

87
00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a specific one in mind right now,

88
00:05:15.959 --> 00:05:17.199
<v Speaker 2>but I was just curious if you were ever to

89
00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>be open to it.

90
00:05:18.439 --> 00:05:22.639
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I've gone on some Catholic podcasts, yeah, and

91
00:05:22.720 --> 00:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>mainly for the purpose of, like again, like I've watched

92
00:05:25.759 --> 00:05:29.399
<v Speaker 4>dude one hundred plus hours probably her stuff, and it

93
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 4>is it'd be nice to have a lot of the

94
00:05:32.279 --> 00:05:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Eastern Orthodox.

95
00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:35.959
<v Speaker 2>It would be Catholic, the Protestant stuff really like concise

96
00:05:36.560 --> 00:05:38.639
<v Speaker 2>concise in one place.

97
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean maybe you're I don't know if you're

98
00:05:41.839 --> 00:05:43.360
<v Speaker 3>new to a lot of this stuff, but I mean

99
00:05:43.439 --> 00:05:47.519
<v Speaker 3>there's a long kind of backstory of just nasty interactions

100
00:05:47.519 --> 00:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of these podcasts, So they don't I

101
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>don't think they want me on their podcasts.

102
00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure. Yeah. I always a lot of that. So

103
00:05:55.879 --> 00:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I then more on topic just for questions and stuff

104
00:06:00.600 --> 00:06:06.879
<v Speaker 2>the Orthodox Church, because I'm doing my best to read

105
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:08.519
<v Speaker 2>up as much as they can and listen to your

106
00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 2>arguments and stuff. You guys reject centralized leadership, right, it's

107
00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>always a council. Is it just heading patcher?

108
00:06:17.319 --> 00:06:20.079
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean that's the highest authority.

109
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:22.399
<v Speaker 2>See, there's no eucmenical patriarch or anything like that.

110
00:06:22.920 --> 00:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, there is an ecumenical patriarch, but he's not above

111
00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>a council.

112
00:06:26.959 --> 00:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>What is his position for.

113
00:06:29.839 --> 00:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Identically the same as the patriarchates in the first thousand

114
00:06:32.879 --> 00:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>years had as a canonical it's a canonical honor that

115
00:06:39.040 --> 00:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>they have within their jurisdictions, within their synods. It doesn't

116
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:45.000
<v Speaker 3>mean that they tell the rest of the church what

117
00:06:45.079 --> 00:06:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to do.

118
00:06:46.040 --> 00:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fair, So there's multiple, there's not just one.

119
00:06:49.079 --> 00:06:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, historically there are five patriarchates. Rome broke away from

120
00:06:53.319 --> 00:06:56.199
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the patriarchates. So what does that say.

121
00:06:57.480 --> 00:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm just asking right now currently, is there one? Is

122
00:06:59.839 --> 00:07:00.439
<v Speaker 2>there multiple?

123
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:01.160
<v Speaker 3>There's multiple?

124
00:07:02.319 --> 00:07:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

125
00:07:03.120 --> 00:07:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Deep for which jurisdictions?

126
00:07:07.240 --> 00:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, a patriarch again, is just a honorary place and

127
00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:16.879
<v Speaker 3>title for people who have a position as the bishop

128
00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:20.199
<v Speaker 3>of a very ancient metropolitan See. So you have the

129
00:07:20.199 --> 00:07:22.959
<v Speaker 3>patriarch at of Moscow, you have the patriarch of Jerusalem,

130
00:07:23.399 --> 00:07:29.519
<v Speaker 3>you have the patriarch Constantinople, Patriarch of Alexandria, Patriarch of Antioch. Right,

131
00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:32.199
<v Speaker 3>so these are the main ancient patriarchal see. Of course

132
00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:36.439
<v Speaker 3>Russia is not antriarchy, but in the Orthodox view, there

133
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.959
<v Speaker 3>can be through conciliar gift, you could say, or honor

134
00:07:41.480 --> 00:07:46.879
<v Speaker 3>autocephalist churches. So the Council of Ephesus created the Autocephalis

135
00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Church of Cyprus. Did you know that?

136
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:57.399
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I not oside my head. I'm sure

137
00:07:58.000 --> 00:07:58.759
<v Speaker 2>read it somewhere.

138
00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, so I'm asking that is like many Roman Catholics the.

139
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Question I'm sorry I miss the question.

140
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:06.759
<v Speaker 3>There was a statement many Roman Catholic The reason I'm

141
00:08:06.839 --> 00:08:09.439
<v Speaker 3>asking you that is that many Roman Catholics are not

142
00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:13.439
<v Speaker 3>aware of autocephalist churches, and so when they hear that,

143
00:08:13.480 --> 00:08:16.000
<v Speaker 3>they think it's something that we as Orthodox have made up.

144
00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>And what I'm saying is that if you look at

145
00:08:18.600 --> 00:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the Council of Ephesus, they create out of the council

146
00:08:22.120 --> 00:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the first autocephalist church. So it's a thing that your

147
00:08:26.279 --> 00:08:28.839
<v Speaker 3>church did as well.

148
00:08:28.920 --> 00:08:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, yeah, I can understand that. So there's multiple patriarchs.

149
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>There's not one you can medical patriarch. They're all acting

150
00:08:39.879 --> 00:08:40.759
<v Speaker 2>in that role. Correct.

151
00:08:42.120 --> 00:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's one person who has the title ecumenical patriarch

152
00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:48.519
<v Speaker 3>and that's Constantinople. And the reason that he has that

153
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:52.919
<v Speaker 3>role is because in the ancient Canons Constantinople Council one

154
00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:57.159
<v Speaker 3>in three eighty one they said, let Constantinople or Old

155
00:08:57.240 --> 00:09:00.320
<v Speaker 3>or New Rome have the place after Old Rome in

156
00:09:00.360 --> 00:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the canonical list. So the Canons of the councils gave

157
00:09:04.120 --> 00:09:06.879
<v Speaker 3>to Constantinople the number two roll.

158
00:09:07.519 --> 00:09:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, canon three? Is that imperial or is that episodic?

159
00:09:12.759 --> 00:09:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Is what an imperial or epistolic?

160
00:09:15.159 --> 00:09:17.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving that phmacy can't say.

161
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, if a council does it, by definition, it's a

162
00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>ecumenical action if it's an ecumenical council. But Rome didn't

163
00:09:26.759 --> 00:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>accept that until many centuries later.

164
00:09:29.799 --> 00:09:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Are you asking me if I'm asking the historical reasoning

165
00:09:32.840 --> 00:09:36.679
<v Speaker 2>for constant privacy being brought up in canond three? Uh?

166
00:09:36.919 --> 00:09:39.679
<v Speaker 3>To my knowledge, there's nothing apostolic about it. It is

167
00:09:39.720 --> 00:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>accorded to that church from the council.

168
00:09:43.480 --> 00:09:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Does that not like raise eyebrows for you at all?

169
00:09:46.279 --> 00:09:46.399
<v Speaker 6>Or not?

170
00:09:46.559 --> 00:09:46.639
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

171
00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:48.240
<v Speaker 3>My gosh, here we go. Are you the guy that

172
00:09:48.279 --> 00:09:50.759
<v Speaker 3>always calls in and doesn't know anything about this topic

173
00:09:50.799 --> 00:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and has the same stupid debate every time we do this.

174
00:09:53.480 --> 00:09:54.840
<v Speaker 2>This is my second time calling it.

175
00:09:54.919 --> 00:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, I thought that's why I thought, does what

176
00:09:58.039 --> 00:10:00.159
<v Speaker 3>not reason? Do you not understand what I do has

177
00:10:00.200 --> 00:10:03.039
<v Speaker 3>told you about the autoct Okay, why you interrupting me? No,

178
00:10:03.159 --> 00:10:06.279
<v Speaker 3>you don't understand why you're interrupting. Don't interrupt me. If

179
00:10:06.279 --> 00:10:09.440
<v Speaker 3>you listen to what I said about autocephalist churches, if

180
00:10:09.440 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 3>an ecumenical council can grant to the Church of Cyprus

181
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:18.039
<v Speaker 3>an autocephalist independent status, that it doesn't matter if the

182
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:21.480
<v Speaker 3>church is quote Apostolic, they have the fullness of the

183
00:10:21.519 --> 00:10:26.399
<v Speaker 3>Apostolic faith because they've been given that from an Apostolic council.

184
00:10:27.039 --> 00:10:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Ecumenical councils are Apostolic councils because they're apostles successors doing it.

185
00:10:33.320 --> 00:10:37.440
<v Speaker 3>So there's nothing about the ecumenical patriarch it that makes it.

186
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>You're referring to the claim that's later on where Constantinople says,

187
00:10:43.240 --> 00:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe we have Apostolic pedigree like Rome. They don't, so,

188
00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>but that has nothing to do with whether a council

189
00:10:52.960 --> 00:10:57.080
<v Speaker 3>can grant to these bishoprics that authority. And do you

190
00:10:57.159 --> 00:11:04.519
<v Speaker 3>not understand that Rome Constantinople as second centuries later?

191
00:11:06.799 --> 00:11:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't. I don't want to dismiss what you

192
00:11:09.799 --> 00:11:13.399
<v Speaker 2>said at all. It doesn't necessarily answer my question or

193
00:11:13.519 --> 00:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>my point, but to kind of give more context, do

194
00:11:18.360 --> 00:11:24.639
<v Speaker 2>that the I don't cephalos excuse me, was and I'm

195
00:11:24.679 --> 00:11:26.639
<v Speaker 2>going to time my head so I literally might be

196
00:11:26.679 --> 00:11:30.559
<v Speaker 2>mistaken here, and you can tell me. Wasn't Ukraine given

197
00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that in Russia not? Or was it vice versa or something?

198
00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:38.559
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine is not an autocephalist church. Ukraine was under the

199
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Russian Church because Ukraine is an ancient Russian area.

200
00:11:43.559 --> 00:11:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, So again I don't want to dismiss your point,

201
00:11:48.440 --> 00:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and I just think it subverts what I'm actually what

202
00:11:52.879 --> 00:11:53.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually saying.

203
00:11:53.559 --> 00:11:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand your point, man, I'm not. I'm trying

204
00:11:55.399 --> 00:11:57.279
<v Speaker 3>to be patient with you because I don't want to

205
00:11:57.399 --> 00:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>argue in fair Okay, So explain to me you're trying

206
00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:01.799
<v Speaker 3>to say, because I have no idea what you're saying.

207
00:12:01.960 --> 00:12:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I guess I'm looking for clarification on what. So

208
00:12:05.039 --> 00:12:10.159
<v Speaker 2>like Rome as clear apostolic, IM sorry for being you

209
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:12.639
<v Speaker 2>know throughout history we all I think we both agree.

210
00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:16.639
<v Speaker 3>That again you're you're misunderstanding right away. So Rome being

211
00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:21.639
<v Speaker 3>apostolic is does has nothing to do with whether or

212
00:12:21.679 --> 00:12:26.679
<v Speaker 3>not other churches are also Apostolic. Antioch Antioch is apostolic,

213
00:12:26.799 --> 00:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Jerusalem is apostolic, said, Alexandria is Apostolic. Yep, okay, that's

214
00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:38.279
<v Speaker 3>let me finish in our view that in the in

215
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the history of the churches and the Council and the Fathers,

216
00:12:41.480 --> 00:12:45.600
<v Speaker 3>those churches are honored because of their lineage and because

217
00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of their ancient history. It does not detract from any

218
00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 3>other church later established, like say the Moscow patriarch It.

219
00:12:56.279 --> 00:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't mean they're less Apostolic because they're not an

220
00:12:59.639 --> 00:13:04.039
<v Speaker 3>ancient Apostolic church. It's just an honor, that's it. There's

221
00:13:04.080 --> 00:13:07.919
<v Speaker 3>nothing about those churches that makes them more Christian, more holy,

222
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:12.759
<v Speaker 3>more powerful than the others, because, as Ignacious says, the

223
00:13:12.799 --> 00:13:15.879
<v Speaker 3>fullness of the church is where the bishop and the

224
00:13:15.919 --> 00:13:16.919
<v Speaker 3>sacraments are.

225
00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Agree.

226
00:13:19.039 --> 00:13:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you don't agree with that because you don't believe that,

227
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and you always argue that you're you were arguing, come on, man,

228
00:13:26.120 --> 00:13:28.840
<v Speaker 3>don't play these games. What what's your point? Man, dude,

229
00:13:29.159 --> 00:13:31.320
<v Speaker 3>you've called in with these same arguments.

230
00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Come on second time?

231
00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Being okay the second time, yes, help me understand your argument.

232
00:13:40.080 --> 00:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't get what you're I'm.

233
00:13:41.080 --> 00:13:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Not even making an argument. I'm really looking for clarification,

234
00:13:43.320 --> 00:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>which you're partially given. But you've also ranted past where

235
00:13:46.279 --> 00:13:47.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to go.

236
00:13:48.360 --> 00:13:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Because I don't think you understand these topics. Maybe you

237
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>need to be ranted at because you don't know what

238
00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:58.159
<v Speaker 3>these topics are about. Brother, do you do? I don't

239
00:13:58.159 --> 00:14:00.240
<v Speaker 3>think you do. You didn't know what an autocephalistic which

240
00:14:00.320 --> 00:14:04.639
<v Speaker 3>was you don't know? Okay, So if how do you

241
00:14:04.720 --> 00:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>know these topics? If you don't know what an autocephalist

242
00:14:07.159 --> 00:14:07.639
<v Speaker 3>church is.

243
00:14:07.720 --> 00:14:08.120
<v Speaker 7>I didn't know.

244
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:10.039
<v Speaker 2>If the top of my head, it's freaking nine o'clock.

245
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Put my kid to bed, Like, what do you want

246
00:14:11.320 --> 00:14:13.519
<v Speaker 2>from me? I'm coming onto your show trying to ask

247
00:14:13.559 --> 00:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a question in your details.

248
00:14:15.120 --> 00:14:18.279
<v Speaker 3>No, you're not. You're you're acting like like you know

249
00:14:18.360 --> 00:14:20.559
<v Speaker 3>these you don't know the subject matter.

250
00:14:20.919 --> 00:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>About five Anusker Well, Rome does this? It's like, I

251
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:25.039
<v Speaker 2>don't care what Rome does right now, I'm asking you

252
00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a question.

253
00:14:26.240 --> 00:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Are you Roman Catholic?

254
00:14:27.960 --> 00:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

255
00:14:28.279 --> 00:14:29.759
<v Speaker 3>Then you do care what Rome does? What are you

256
00:14:29.759 --> 00:14:30.279
<v Speaker 3>talking about?

257
00:14:31.080 --> 00:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Not from not I'm pertaining to the conversation. I'm asking

258
00:14:36.080 --> 00:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>you a question about the imperial decrease.

259
00:14:38.399 --> 00:14:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Not being passive aggressive, just make your argument.

260
00:14:41.600 --> 00:14:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So again, it's not really an argument's more just I'm.

261
00:14:44.919 --> 00:14:46.559
<v Speaker 3>Curious, make your point.

262
00:14:46.840 --> 00:14:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Why was it based on an imperial decree and rather

263
00:14:50.320 --> 00:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>than apastolic authority like Rome had. Then later I understand

264
00:14:54.360 --> 00:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>you explained that part I'm trying to finish. Then later

265
00:14:57.080 --> 00:15:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you have the instance where which everyone warned concept about

266
00:15:02.399 --> 00:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>was I think six hundred I think it was Saint Gregory.

267
00:15:07.159 --> 00:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>The East was calling themselves the universal Bishop. So how

268
00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:13.759
<v Speaker 2>does this stuff not continue to lead to those issues

269
00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:17.679
<v Speaker 2>where now you have a euc medical patriarch which is

270
00:15:17.919 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 2>apparently just an honorary title, has no actual meaning.

271
00:15:21.960 --> 00:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying that that's what I said? I said,

272
00:15:23.639 --> 00:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>it's an honorary tiger where he has canonical privileges in

273
00:15:26.759 --> 00:15:30.399
<v Speaker 3>his jurisdiction. I didn't say it had no extra Sorry,

274
00:15:30.480 --> 00:15:32.039
<v Speaker 3>go ahead. I didn't say it had no meaning. Don't

275
00:15:32.039 --> 00:15:32.919
<v Speaker 3>put words in my mouth.

276
00:15:33.960 --> 00:15:35.639
<v Speaker 2>No, I said that. I'm not saying you said, Okay,

277
00:15:35.679 --> 00:15:42.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm sair enough. Has he ever exercised any primacy authority

278
00:15:43.000 --> 00:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in over the church? So for example, you guys can't

279
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>agree on if someone should be rebaptized, right, So if.

280
00:15:49.320 --> 00:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Don't play this one game Dude, you're starting to piss

281
00:15:51.159 --> 00:15:53.240
<v Speaker 3>me off. That's not true that we don't agree with

282
00:15:53.279 --> 00:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>that because some people have disagreements online. You're assuming that

283
00:15:57.559 --> 00:15:59.679
<v Speaker 3>we can't figure this out or agree with it. It's

284
00:15:59.720 --> 00:16:03.919
<v Speaker 3>because of the principle stop interrupting me, or we're never

285
00:16:03.960 --> 00:16:07.039
<v Speaker 3>going to talk again. Okay, good, it's because of the

286
00:16:07.080 --> 00:16:11.600
<v Speaker 3>principle of the interpretation at a local level that's allowed.

287
00:16:11.720 --> 00:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>And so there's not a one size fits all rule.

288
00:16:15.039 --> 00:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>You don't even know that your own canons of your

289
00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:21.120
<v Speaker 3>church in the ancient then the sixth Council, for example,

290
00:16:21.519 --> 00:16:24.720
<v Speaker 3>specify that certain people have to be rebaptized even if

291
00:16:24.759 --> 00:16:28.399
<v Speaker 3>they were baptized in a Trinitarian formula, for example, the

292
00:16:28.440 --> 00:16:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Politians or the Eunomians, because it was a Unitarian baptism

293
00:16:33.399 --> 00:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>even though it said the right words. So there's canonical

294
00:16:36.879 --> 00:16:39.679
<v Speaker 3>reasons why we do that. It's not an issue of

295
00:16:40.279 --> 00:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>we can't figure it out. It's left to the local

296
00:16:43.279 --> 00:16:45.720
<v Speaker 3>bishops to decide that. And that's how the church did

297
00:16:45.799 --> 00:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>in the first thousand years.

298
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:46.919
<v Speaker 5>Man.

299
00:16:47.919 --> 00:16:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And by the way, I'm perfectly fine accepting stuff

300
00:16:51.320 --> 00:16:54.799
<v Speaker 2>like remarks like that, I'm not staying outright. Hey, you

301
00:16:54.840 --> 00:16:56.639
<v Speaker 2>guys do this, Like, if you want to correct me

302
00:16:56.679 --> 00:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>on that stuff, that's great. I've had multiple Orthodox priests

303
00:17:03.039 --> 00:17:04.079
<v Speaker 2>tell many different things.

304
00:17:04.240 --> 00:17:06.759
<v Speaker 3>That's why, well guess what, I guess how many Roman

305
00:17:06.759 --> 00:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Catholic priests are going to tell me different things? So

306
00:17:09.039 --> 00:17:10.000
<v Speaker 3>that's what does that prove?

307
00:17:10.279 --> 00:17:13.079
<v Speaker 2>That's fair? I think that's fair. I'm just telling you

308
00:17:13.160 --> 00:17:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I can say that based off the experience I've had

309
00:17:15.480 --> 00:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>with the Orthodox people that I've spoken to. So I

310
00:17:21.400 --> 00:17:22.759
<v Speaker 2>don't want to take up so much more time, but

311
00:17:24.920 --> 00:17:27.319
<v Speaker 2>one more question of would have then if you have

312
00:17:27.480 --> 00:17:31.599
<v Speaker 2>these like schisms, these ethnic based schisms, right, So you.

313
00:17:31.559 --> 00:17:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Mean like in the Roman Caloic church like in Antioch

314
00:17:33.759 --> 00:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>where there's three patriarchs of Antioch.

315
00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:40.359
<v Speaker 2>That no more ethnic centric?

316
00:17:40.480 --> 00:17:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So like, does that ever happen in Roman Catholic churches

317
00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>like Croatia where they're ethnocentric? Do you mean like liturgically?

318
00:17:50.799 --> 00:17:55.559
<v Speaker 3>You said ethnocentric liturgically is linguistic? So well, I guess.

319
00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:56.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to undertand.

320
00:17:56.599 --> 00:17:58.119
<v Speaker 3>When I go to if I go to Poland, is

321
00:17:58.119 --> 00:18:02.599
<v Speaker 3>it ethnocentrically Catholic or what it's Catholic? Oh, but it's

322
00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>not nothing centrically Catholic.

323
00:18:04.480 --> 00:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, if I if I go down the road to

324
00:18:07.519 --> 00:18:09.599
<v Speaker 2>my Catholic this is again getting off the topic of

325
00:18:09.599 --> 00:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>my question.

326
00:18:10.079 --> 00:18:12.440
<v Speaker 3>No, it's so you you load your questions with these

327
00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:14.880
<v Speaker 3>passive aggressive jobs and then you act like a victim

328
00:18:14.880 --> 00:18:18.440
<v Speaker 3>when I call that out aggressive. No, come on, dude, No,

329
00:18:18.640 --> 00:18:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I know my heart.

330
00:18:19.680 --> 00:18:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Dude, it's not as aggressive, I promise you. I literally,

331
00:18:21.839 --> 00:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to engage these things that literally from

332
00:18:24.319 --> 00:18:30.400
<v Speaker 2>me mm hmm yeah literally, yeah. But why do you

333
00:18:30.440 --> 00:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>have such a war.

334
00:18:31.640 --> 00:18:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Editor because you're it's it's inauthentic, dude. I've done this

335
00:18:34.960 --> 00:18:38.240
<v Speaker 3>for twenty years. I can spot the passive aggressive bullshit

336
00:18:40.279 --> 00:18:40.759
<v Speaker 3>any day.

337
00:18:40.759 --> 00:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I actually think it would be good buddies. But uh,

338
00:18:44.039 --> 00:18:46.319
<v Speaker 2>that's yeah. Another time.

339
00:18:46.359 --> 00:18:49.519
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's because you guys always act the same way.

340
00:18:49.559 --> 00:18:51.359
<v Speaker 3>You do the same stuff, and I can tell by

341
00:18:51.400 --> 00:18:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the way and then you interrupt me a year you're

342
00:18:54.480 --> 00:18:57.400
<v Speaker 3>asking loaded questions and you load it with the passive

343
00:18:57.440 --> 00:19:02.160
<v Speaker 3>aggressive jabs like so like with you're that's nocentric religion,

344
00:19:02.359 --> 00:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know what that's getting at. You're trying to

345
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>say the Orthodoxy isn't ethnocentric, and we have these problems

346
00:19:07.720 --> 00:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>as if your own freaking gay church doesn't have that problem.

347
00:19:13.200 --> 00:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm asking in what way do we have

348
00:19:15.039 --> 00:19:15.559
<v Speaker 2>that problem?

349
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:15.880
<v Speaker 8>Then?

350
00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Are you serious?

351
00:19:19.359 --> 00:19:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Dude?

352
00:19:20.480 --> 00:19:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Made a claim? Are Mexicans ethnocentric with their with their Catholicism?

353
00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Meaning what give me an example?

354
00:19:28.119 --> 00:19:29.759
<v Speaker 3>My gosh, all right, don't ever talk to me again.

355
00:19:29.920 --> 00:19:34.519
<v Speaker 3>Just go away. Yeah, you can't actually make good arguments,

356
00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>and that's why you because your arguments are retarded and

357
00:19:38.400 --> 00:19:41.960
<v Speaker 3>stupid and they just rambled. They are you think, I

358
00:19:42.000 --> 00:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know what a loaded question and a loaded loaded

359
00:19:44.240 --> 00:19:44.799
<v Speaker 3>statement is.

360
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>If a question appears, if someone's interested in and they

361
00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>get these.

362
00:19:50.559 --> 00:19:52.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I don't believe you are because you come

363
00:19:52.640 --> 00:19:54.440
<v Speaker 3>and you ask bad faith questions.

364
00:19:54.039 --> 00:19:54.680
<v Speaker 9>That's why.

365
00:19:54.839 --> 00:19:57.599
<v Speaker 2>But you're saying their bad faith and they're just there

366
00:19:57.640 --> 00:19:58.799
<v Speaker 2>questions that appear.

367
00:19:59.200 --> 00:20:02.400
<v Speaker 3>All the chat. Believe that you're gaslighting and being a bitch.

368
00:20:02.559 --> 00:20:03.799
<v Speaker 3>So you're calling me a bitch.

369
00:20:04.279 --> 00:20:05.119
<v Speaker 2>I literally don't care.

370
00:20:05.359 --> 00:20:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Well good, that's God's good that you don't care, because

371
00:20:07.400 --> 00:20:08.920
<v Speaker 3>nobody's buying your crap.

372
00:20:09.000 --> 00:20:10.279
<v Speaker 2>That's why it's not crap.

373
00:20:10.359 --> 00:20:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you make an argument? Why can't you make

374
00:20:12.480 --> 00:20:13.319
<v Speaker 3>an actual argument?

375
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Because I didn't come here to argue with you, but

376
00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>you did.

377
00:20:16.680 --> 00:20:20.680
<v Speaker 3>You did because you're debating, So just be honest and debate.

378
00:20:21.319 --> 00:20:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I would respect you more.

379
00:20:23.000 --> 00:20:25.559
<v Speaker 2>I know you get a hard on from debating people. Yeah,

380
00:20:25.640 --> 00:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm literally trying not to do that. I'm trying to

381
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>engage Eastern Orthodoxy polemically, yes, like obviously from an apology.

382
00:20:32.519 --> 00:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, polemics is debating. So why are you talking bullshit again?

383
00:20:35.400 --> 00:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Like you're not debating and stating that my questions while

384
00:20:38.319 --> 00:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>they arrive in polemic nature.

385
00:20:41.319 --> 00:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>That's debating. Stop being such a skittles man and just

386
00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:46.759
<v Speaker 3>make your point like a man. Dude. What's your argument?

387
00:20:46.839 --> 00:20:47.599
<v Speaker 3>What's your question?

388
00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

389
00:20:54.960 --> 00:20:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Everyone believes your bad faith, so you've not convinced anyone

390
00:20:57.720 --> 00:20:58.400
<v Speaker 3>that you argue with.

391
00:20:58.759 --> 00:21:00.400
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk about jealousy?

392
00:21:00.920 --> 00:21:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Stop, how's that a fallacy? It's an analysis of everyone everyone.

393
00:21:08.240 --> 00:21:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't sound like that, dude.

394
00:21:09.519 --> 00:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>You're in your chat. Of course everyone's going to agree

395
00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:12.400
<v Speaker 2>with you.

396
00:21:12.480 --> 00:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Jay, there's plenty of Protestants in the chat.

397
00:21:14.920 --> 00:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't want no pro agree with me.

398
00:21:18.559 --> 00:21:21.559
<v Speaker 3>So you've you've missed on. You didn't know what autocephalist

399
00:21:21.640 --> 00:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>churches are, and you're here to tell me that. You said, yeah,

400
00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:27.480
<v Speaker 3>because it's embarrassing. You said you know these topics.

401
00:21:27.119 --> 00:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, yes, embarrassed me.

402
00:21:28.799 --> 00:21:31.119
<v Speaker 3>No, I do know the topics, but you don't know

403
00:21:31.119 --> 00:21:33.359
<v Speaker 3>a basic about church history and church governance.

404
00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So, like I said, it's nine o'clock.

405
00:21:37.200 --> 00:21:40.559
<v Speaker 3>Oh, so that's your excuse, Yeah, because your kids are goodbye,

406
00:21:41.279 --> 00:21:46.319
<v Speaker 3>waste of time, and everybody knows you're being a slam ball.

407
00:21:46.400 --> 00:21:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Right up. I do know these topics, but I'm putting

408
00:21:53.960 --> 00:21:56.359
<v Speaker 3>my kiss of better and it's nine o'clock. Nine o'clock,

409
00:21:57.799 --> 00:22:02.119
<v Speaker 3>so what and everybody here saw him. They love to

410
00:22:02.160 --> 00:22:05.519
<v Speaker 3>throw these jabs, the passive aggressive Roman Catholics will throw these.

411
00:22:06.119 --> 00:22:11.079
<v Speaker 3>So you're you're ethnic churches. It's like a Roman Calgary

412
00:22:11.119 --> 00:22:14.119
<v Speaker 3>church is not ethnically based. What are you talking about?

413
00:22:15.039 --> 00:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you even mean? What do you mean? Or

414
00:22:18.799 --> 00:22:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Mexicans death? No Catholics, like obviously you know what I mean? Ryok,

415
00:22:26.119 --> 00:22:26.799
<v Speaker 3>what's up on you?

416
00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:28.599
<v Speaker 2>Hey? What's up?

417
00:22:28.680 --> 00:22:28.920
<v Speaker 8>Jay?

418
00:22:31.319 --> 00:22:34.519
<v Speaker 10>I'm a Catechuman, but I thought this was a relevant topic.

419
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:38.079
<v Speaker 10>I wanted to get some clarity on. I asked my

420
00:22:38.119 --> 00:22:40.920
<v Speaker 10>priests about it, and it's kind of a gray area.

421
00:22:41.200 --> 00:22:47.920
<v Speaker 10>I'm a transitioning to Greek Greek Orthodox from Protestantism or

422
00:22:48.000 --> 00:22:52.599
<v Speaker 10>like non denomination, I guess, and can you hear me?

423
00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:56.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's not catechumen nights. So I'm not trying

424
00:22:56.799 --> 00:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to be mean to you, but I asked for people

425
00:22:58.400 --> 00:23:00.519
<v Speaker 3>who disagree. So what your question?

426
00:23:01.759 --> 00:23:04.960
<v Speaker 10>So my church, we have a relic of the Holy Cross, right,

427
00:23:05.480 --> 00:23:08.480
<v Speaker 10>and we had the service last night, and uh, there's

428
00:23:08.920 --> 00:23:12.519
<v Speaker 10>Catholic church that is also attending. So I kind of asked, like,

429
00:23:12.799 --> 00:23:17.119
<v Speaker 10>isn't this like not allowed, Like isn't it heresy?

430
00:23:17.799 --> 00:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

431
00:23:18.079 --> 00:23:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean I don't know that exactly what's going on,

432
00:23:20.759 --> 00:23:23.279
<v Speaker 3>but like for them to come and attend is not

433
00:23:23.319 --> 00:23:26.960
<v Speaker 3>necessarily wrong. But if they're giving the Eucharist to Roman

434
00:23:27.000 --> 00:23:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Catholics that would be bad news. But uh, yeah, you

435
00:23:29.880 --> 00:23:33.039
<v Speaker 3>might want to find a you know, better Orthodox church.

436
00:23:35.440 --> 00:23:38.519
<v Speaker 3>All y'all, People do not bring me those kinds of

437
00:23:39.359 --> 00:23:41.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm not being I'm just not in the mood for

438
00:23:41.319 --> 00:23:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the catechumen questions. Man, I'm all hyped up, and I'm like,

439
00:23:46.000 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 3>we got two idiots in a row? Low, what's up?

440
00:23:51.799 --> 00:23:52.079
<v Speaker 11>Hello?

441
00:23:52.720 --> 00:23:53.279
<v Speaker 8>Can you hear me?

442
00:23:53.519 --> 00:23:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Yep? All right?

443
00:23:55.599 --> 00:23:59.359
<v Speaker 12>So my first question is I didn't watch a lot

444
00:23:59.400 --> 00:24:07.480
<v Speaker 12>of content a few how did you came to the

445
00:24:07.480 --> 00:24:11.480
<v Speaker 12>conclusion that you want to be Orthodox or that orthodox

446
00:24:11.640 --> 00:24:12.960
<v Speaker 12>is is that in.

447
00:24:12.920 --> 00:24:16.440
<v Speaker 3>The topic, that is the topic. My journey into Orthodoxy

448
00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Protestantism is false. Proved me wrong. It's not my testimony today.

449
00:24:24.079 --> 00:24:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Anybody from this point out not keeping to the topic.

450
00:24:27.680 --> 00:24:31.319
<v Speaker 3>You're out mocking profit.

451
00:24:32.799 --> 00:24:36.160
<v Speaker 8>Hey Jay, you.

452
00:24:36.200 --> 00:24:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Had a posting on recently on X a couple of

453
00:24:40.079 --> 00:24:44.240
<v Speaker 7>number of Church Fathers canon lists, and notice that you

454
00:24:44.440 --> 00:24:49.160
<v Speaker 7>circle first and second eestras on a few of them,

455
00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:51.480
<v Speaker 7>Ethinatious being one of them.

456
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:54.920
<v Speaker 8>Just wondering, isn't that ezra nei maya correct?

457
00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:58.720
<v Speaker 7>Okay, it looked like you were circling it as is

458
00:24:59.119 --> 00:25:01.160
<v Speaker 7>to show that it's an not one of the canonical.

459
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>No, it's canonical because it's titled differently. But I was

460
00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:09.880
<v Speaker 3>circling from my own personal notes at the time I

461
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:13.039
<v Speaker 3>read that book when I was Protestant, right, so that's

462
00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:17.960
<v Speaker 3>my notes from twenty years ago. Okay, twenty five, twenty

463
00:25:17.960 --> 00:25:19.559
<v Speaker 3>three years ago, got it?

464
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:20.240
<v Speaker 5>So?

465
00:25:20.440 --> 00:25:25.519
<v Speaker 7>Okay, just on that point then, like, how do you,

466
00:25:25.559 --> 00:25:26.519
<v Speaker 7>as an Orthodox.

467
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:29.039
<v Speaker 8>I'm a Protestant, so how do he as an Orthodox.

468
00:25:28.759 --> 00:25:33.880
<v Speaker 7>Understand the canon lists, especially with like Athenais being really

469
00:25:34.039 --> 00:25:36.759
<v Speaker 7>you know, much closer to a Protestant canon and not

470
00:25:36.799 --> 00:25:39.839
<v Speaker 7>just Athenians. You got the other Eastern fathers as well,

471
00:25:39.880 --> 00:25:43.160
<v Speaker 7>pretty early ones that are closer to a Protestant canon.

472
00:25:43.880 --> 00:25:45.759
<v Speaker 3>No, they're not. I don't even know what are you

473
00:25:45.799 --> 00:25:46.480
<v Speaker 3>even talking about?

474
00:25:47.720 --> 00:25:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean the list that you had there of

475
00:25:49.519 --> 00:25:51.599
<v Speaker 8>Athenais for example, I mean I don't have in front

476
00:25:51.640 --> 00:25:51.799
<v Speaker 8>of me.

477
00:25:51.839 --> 00:25:54.160
<v Speaker 13>But you know it doesn't have the Macabees on there.

478
00:25:55.200 --> 00:26:01.559
<v Speaker 13>He doesn't list t bit Uh, it's just a bunch

479
00:26:01.559 --> 00:26:02.119
<v Speaker 13>of them like there.

480
00:26:02.200 --> 00:26:05.119
<v Speaker 7>It's a closer canon list to Protestantism than it.

481
00:26:05.039 --> 00:26:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Is to So again, did you not hear like the

482
00:26:08.400 --> 00:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>first hour today?

483
00:26:10.559 --> 00:26:10.680
<v Speaker 8>No?

484
00:26:10.759 --> 00:26:11.079
<v Speaker 6>I didn't.

485
00:26:11.119 --> 00:26:16.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's fine, let me scroll back to it. So

486
00:26:16.359 --> 00:26:20.680
<v Speaker 3>individual church fathers lists are just one way of demonstrating

487
00:26:20.799 --> 00:26:25.680
<v Speaker 3>variation and debate about the Old Testament canon. Okay. Athanasia

488
00:26:25.759 --> 00:26:30.799
<v Speaker 3>specifically says that the deuterocanonical texts are the best for

489
00:26:31.880 --> 00:26:35.160
<v Speaker 3>catech humans to read. So the fact that he says

490
00:26:35.240 --> 00:26:38.200
<v Speaker 3>that it's for categ humans means that it does teach

491
00:26:38.240 --> 00:26:40.799
<v Speaker 3>theology and doctrine, because this is what you're teaching the

492
00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:43.440
<v Speaker 3>new people in the church, right, So he doesn't just

493
00:26:43.440 --> 00:26:46.079
<v Speaker 3>because something is a Deutero canon does not mean it's

494
00:26:46.079 --> 00:26:50.200
<v Speaker 3>not inspired or not canon It means that it's specifically

495
00:26:50.279 --> 00:26:53.279
<v Speaker 3>its own purpose for catechisis it doesn't have the same

496
00:26:53.400 --> 00:26:55.880
<v Speaker 3>import as the rest of the text. But that does

497
00:26:55.920 --> 00:26:58.319
<v Speaker 3>not mean that it's not canonical, nor does that mean

498
00:26:58.359 --> 00:27:01.279
<v Speaker 3>it's not inspired. What I argued was, if you go

499
00:27:01.440 --> 00:27:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to the example of the Canons of the Apostles, the

500
00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:10.000
<v Speaker 3>apstol Canons, which is early church law, you're familiar with that?

501
00:27:11.759 --> 00:27:13.079
<v Speaker 8>No? Not not with that one?

502
00:27:13.160 --> 00:27:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

503
00:27:13.599 --> 00:27:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you pull up Apostolic canons on your phone? Are

504
00:27:17.279 --> 00:27:18.519
<v Speaker 3>you on online right now? Or not?

505
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:19.960
<v Speaker 8>Just on my phone?

506
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So Canon eighty five of the Apostles, this is

507
00:27:23.920 --> 00:27:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the normative church law in the East right in the

508
00:27:28.200 --> 00:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>three hundreds, and it lists the Deuterocononical books as the Bible.

509
00:27:34.279 --> 00:27:38.799
<v Speaker 3>So the normative canon beyond just one church Father Athanasius

510
00:27:39.359 --> 00:27:43.240
<v Speaker 3>in Canon eighty five of the Apostles, does include it's

511
00:27:43.240 --> 00:27:46.960
<v Speaker 3>called the apstol Canons. It does include the Deuteroconical text.

512
00:27:47.160 --> 00:27:49.400
<v Speaker 3>It does not even specify that there are a separate

513
00:27:49.440 --> 00:27:53.440
<v Speaker 3>section section, separate second group. It just says they're the

514
00:27:53.480 --> 00:27:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Old Testament contemporary with this a few years after let's

515
00:27:57.519 --> 00:28:00.279
<v Speaker 3>say this is three hundreds, maybe it's three fifty, because

516
00:28:00.279 --> 00:28:03.400
<v Speaker 3>it's between three to four hundred not too long after that,

517
00:28:03.480 --> 00:28:07.799
<v Speaker 3>you have the Council of Rome that Augustine agrees to

518
00:28:08.839 --> 00:28:13.519
<v Speaker 3>that Pope Damasis affirms, which does include the dudocononical texts

519
00:28:13.680 --> 00:28:16.519
<v Speaker 3>as the canon. And at the same time that councils

520
00:28:16.559 --> 00:28:20.079
<v Speaker 3>of Carthage affirm the Dudo canonical texts, and for the

521
00:28:20.200 --> 00:28:24.519
<v Speaker 3>Orthodox Church, by the time of Trollo and the Seventh

522
00:28:24.559 --> 00:28:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Ecumenical Council it affirms the canons of Carthage. So the

523
00:28:29.920 --> 00:28:32.880
<v Speaker 3>East and the West by the time of Trollo and

524
00:28:32.920 --> 00:28:37.279
<v Speaker 3>the Seventh Ecmmenical Council all agree universally that the Dutero

525
00:28:37.400 --> 00:28:40.519
<v Speaker 3>Canon is part of the Bible, the text that hold

526
00:28:40.599 --> 00:28:45.839
<v Speaker 3>on last thing, last thing, last thing. The Protestant excuse me,

527
00:28:45.839 --> 00:28:50.839
<v Speaker 3>the list that I have Melito of Sartists does not have.

528
00:28:51.319 --> 00:28:55.359
<v Speaker 3>It's not the Protestant Canon. In fact, we showed that

529
00:28:55.440 --> 00:28:58.680
<v Speaker 3>earlier because Melito's list includes Wisdom. So this is not

530
00:28:58.759 --> 00:29:04.359
<v Speaker 3>actually accurate. Athanasius Is canon has Barrack in it. Barack

531
00:29:04.480 --> 00:29:06.920
<v Speaker 3>is not in the Protestant Bible, so that's not going

532
00:29:06.960 --> 00:29:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to help you. Yeah.

533
00:29:10.039 --> 00:29:12.119
<v Speaker 8>So okay, So a couple of things here. One is

534
00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:17.799
<v Speaker 8>maybe I'll go maybe I'll go former than and then

535
00:29:17.799 --> 00:29:23.359
<v Speaker 8>go to the latter. So Trullo is, so how do you?

536
00:29:23.400 --> 00:29:23.799
<v Speaker 11>How do you?

537
00:29:24.720 --> 00:29:28.640
<v Speaker 8>Is Truello? Where you get your h The main list

538
00:29:28.680 --> 00:29:29.559
<v Speaker 8>of canon.

539
00:29:29.359 --> 00:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>For your Trello affirms Carthage, and the Seventh Ecumenical Council

540
00:29:34.359 --> 00:29:36.480
<v Speaker 3>affirms Trollo and Carthage.

541
00:29:38.960 --> 00:29:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, so okay, John Saint John Damascus, he doesn't.

542
00:29:46.079 --> 00:29:50.480
<v Speaker 8>He's after Trullo. And why wouldn't he.

543
00:29:50.480 --> 00:29:55.279
<v Speaker 3>Affirm Trullo Because because he's riding at the time of

544
00:29:55.279 --> 00:29:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the Seventh Ecumenical Council, he's one of the theologians, that's

545
00:29:58.039 --> 00:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the his theology is used at the seventh Aeminical Council,

546
00:30:01.400 --> 00:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and the Orthodox view does not have a rigid notion

547
00:30:05.000 --> 00:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>of this. We have flexibility because even as later John Damascus,

548
00:30:08.759 --> 00:30:13.039
<v Speaker 3>as you're pointing out, he probably thought that the Canons

549
00:30:13.039 --> 00:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of the Apostles is the right canon because canon's' Apostles

550
00:30:16.880 --> 00:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>includes Clement. So most likely John Damascus thought that Canon

551
00:30:20.960 --> 00:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>eighty five was the right canon, and that's why he

552
00:30:24.359 --> 00:30:25.319
<v Speaker 3>listed as he does.

553
00:30:26.759 --> 00:30:30.160
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So okay, So if I go to your other

554
00:30:30.200 --> 00:30:34.920
<v Speaker 7>point there, why do these guys, you know, even Serle

555
00:30:34.960 --> 00:30:43.519
<v Speaker 7>of Jerusalem, the Cirl Jerusalem Athinatious, Uh, I think one

556
00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:48.599
<v Speaker 7>of the Cappadocians that that actually lists the canons there.

557
00:30:48.640 --> 00:30:49.440
<v Speaker 8>You know they don't.

558
00:30:49.440 --> 00:30:52.400
<v Speaker 7>They don't have these books that.

559
00:30:51.759 --> 00:30:52.359
<v Speaker 8>That you have.

560
00:30:52.680 --> 00:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>And hell, what are you talking about?

561
00:30:56.039 --> 00:30:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Like they don't list for Sirl Jerusalem.

562
00:30:58.240 --> 00:31:01.359
<v Speaker 7>He actually says that he does in list the Dudoconicals.

563
00:31:01.400 --> 00:31:03.680
<v Speaker 8>He says, don't even read them. And he says that.

564
00:31:03.680 --> 00:31:04.319
<v Speaker 3>No, he doesn't.

565
00:31:05.119 --> 00:31:08.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he says, by the apostles the list that he has.

566
00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Where does he say not to read the Dudoconical texts.

567
00:31:11.480 --> 00:31:14.519
<v Speaker 3>I've read the catechetical lectures. So where are you getting that?

568
00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:16.160
<v Speaker 8>I could pull it up right now.

569
00:31:16.200 --> 00:31:28.519
<v Speaker 3>But so I mean in the list that Lee McDonald has, Uh,

570
00:31:28.680 --> 00:31:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Cyril of Jerusalem also has Barrack. And as I pointed out,

571
00:31:32.920 --> 00:31:37.960
<v Speaker 3>when Athanasius talks about these texts, he says the Duo.

572
00:31:38.519 --> 00:31:41.880
<v Speaker 3>He says, the Wisdom texts of Wisdom of Solomon and Syruc.

573
00:31:42.039 --> 00:31:46.119
<v Speaker 3>He says, those are great for catechumens to read. So again,

574
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:50.599
<v Speaker 3>the fact that they're not listed in that list does

575
00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:53.440
<v Speaker 3>not mean that for the Orthodox Church they're not part

576
00:31:53.480 --> 00:31:57.200
<v Speaker 3>of the canon. You're just assuming that canon must be

577
00:31:57.519 --> 00:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>read in the Protestant sense, like, we don't have a

578
00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:02.480
<v Speaker 3>problem with flexibility on this because we believe in tradition.

579
00:32:05.799 --> 00:32:10.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, okay, so if if yeah, so your.

580
00:32:10.319 --> 00:32:18.839
<v Speaker 7>Point about Athenaious listing judochrononical book like barug I think

581
00:32:18.880 --> 00:32:22.279
<v Speaker 7>the Protestant claim is more that that these canons are

582
00:32:22.319 --> 00:32:25.279
<v Speaker 7>closer to the Protestant canon, not that they're not.

583
00:32:25.519 --> 00:32:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Though.

584
00:32:25.839 --> 00:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing is that it's not so oh so

585
00:32:27.799 --> 00:32:30.240
<v Speaker 3>now it's moving the goalpost, so now it's closer, right,

586
00:32:30.279 --> 00:32:31.359
<v Speaker 3>So it's not the protest.

587
00:32:31.079 --> 00:32:33.039
<v Speaker 8>I can So that's been my point from the beginnings.

588
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:36.160
<v Speaker 7>I always said, we're the Protestant canon is closer to

589
00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:39.079
<v Speaker 7>what these guys are claiming than what.

590
00:32:39.039 --> 00:32:39.400
<v Speaker 8>You guys are.

591
00:32:39.519 --> 00:32:42.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but again you're missing the point, which is ironic

592
00:32:42.119 --> 00:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>because the ecumen, the more broad accepted canon beyond just

593
00:32:47.039 --> 00:32:50.839
<v Speaker 3>individual church fathers, is the Deutero canonical text in the

594
00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 3>East on the basis of the Apostolic canons Canon eighty five.

595
00:32:54.480 --> 00:32:58.119
<v Speaker 3>That's church law, which is more widespread and normative than

596
00:32:58.559 --> 00:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>just what Athanasius thought.

597
00:33:01.960 --> 00:33:04.039
<v Speaker 8>But I mean, why wouldn't.

598
00:33:05.759 --> 00:33:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Because they didn't believe in soul scripture. Man, That's why

599
00:33:08.200 --> 00:33:11.640
<v Speaker 3>because they weren't thinking that the church follows one written

600
00:33:11.680 --> 00:33:15.279
<v Speaker 3>authority as its final authority. They can have different canons

601
00:33:15.319 --> 00:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>because it's not a religion based around the book. That's

602
00:33:19.200 --> 00:33:19.599
<v Speaker 3>the point.

603
00:33:20.200 --> 00:33:24.559
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So okay, So Cyril Cyril's catecular lectures here, he

604
00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:30.880
<v Speaker 7>says that, Oh, man, I don't know if you have

605
00:33:30.960 --> 00:33:31.480
<v Speaker 7>it there.

606
00:33:31.359 --> 00:33:32.960
<v Speaker 8>But he says he lists the canon.

607
00:33:33.319 --> 00:33:34.880
<v Speaker 7>He says, these are the ones that have been handed

608
00:33:34.880 --> 00:33:38.640
<v Speaker 7>down by the apostles, or that were handed down to us.

609
00:33:38.880 --> 00:33:41.359
<v Speaker 7>He says, there's there's a twenty two book canon, so

610
00:33:41.640 --> 00:33:45.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, aligned to the Jewish counting, not necessarily identical.

611
00:33:45.920 --> 00:33:48.119
<v Speaker 3>This is not going to help you. What's his new

612
00:33:48.160 --> 00:33:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Testament canon?

613
00:33:51.960 --> 00:33:53.200
<v Speaker 8>Zinon Testament cannon is.

614
00:33:55.759 --> 00:33:59.880
<v Speaker 7>Seven Catholic epistles, James Peter, John Jude, the epistles of Paul.

615
00:34:00.079 --> 00:34:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, notice anything missing?

616
00:34:03.640 --> 00:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Probably revelation correct.

617
00:34:05.599 --> 00:34:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So how's that going to help you? Why are we

618
00:34:07.039 --> 00:34:08.159
<v Speaker 3>supposed to follow him?

619
00:34:08.679 --> 00:34:10.679
<v Speaker 8>Well, no, I'm not saying that we need to follow

620
00:34:10.719 --> 00:34:11.760
<v Speaker 8>any one person.

621
00:34:12.199 --> 00:34:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, now it's moving. Now we move the goalpost, right,

622
00:34:14.599 --> 00:34:17.480
<v Speaker 3>so now it's now it's not any of them, who

623
00:34:17.559 --> 00:34:17.840
<v Speaker 3>is it?

624
00:34:18.760 --> 00:34:18.840
<v Speaker 5>No?

625
00:34:19.320 --> 00:34:21.480
<v Speaker 7>I think that I think that the canon does come

626
00:34:21.559 --> 00:34:25.559
<v Speaker 7>through tradition. I'm not denying that as a Protestant. I'm

627
00:34:26.000 --> 00:34:29.320
<v Speaker 7>what I argue as a Protestant is that I think

628
00:34:29.360 --> 00:34:31.679
<v Speaker 7>that the church Fathers are we're trying to get to

629
00:34:31.760 --> 00:34:33.440
<v Speaker 7>a twenty two canon.

630
00:34:33.519 --> 00:34:36.159
<v Speaker 8>I really think that the twenty two book is something

631
00:34:36.159 --> 00:34:38.719
<v Speaker 8>that was handed down to them. It's consistent.

632
00:34:39.079 --> 00:34:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, on what basis are you're just asserting list because

633
00:34:41.840 --> 00:34:44.159
<v Speaker 3>they all say that, like, no, they don't, No, they

634
00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:47.639
<v Speaker 3>don't books. He doesn't have the Book of Revelation. What

635
00:34:47.639 --> 00:34:48.320
<v Speaker 3>are you talking.

636
00:34:48.079 --> 00:34:50.000
<v Speaker 8>About about Old Testament canon?

637
00:34:52.320 --> 00:34:54.320
<v Speaker 3>The question is how do you on what? How do

638
00:34:54.360 --> 00:34:57.079
<v Speaker 3>you know the epistemic principle that you're saying is the

639
00:34:57.159 --> 00:34:59.400
<v Speaker 3>right way to go about deciding? Is that all the

640
00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:02.159
<v Speaker 3>church father dis church Father many of them? How do

641
00:35:02.239 --> 00:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you know you're just asserting these things. Oh, it's the

642
00:35:05.000 --> 00:35:06.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty two we're.

643
00:35:06.320 --> 00:35:08.119
<v Speaker 7>Trying to get to the you know, we're trying to

644
00:35:08.400 --> 00:35:10.800
<v Speaker 7>the beat is over. The Old Testament can not necessarily

645
00:35:10.920 --> 00:35:11.239
<v Speaker 7>new one.

646
00:35:11.280 --> 00:35:13.760
<v Speaker 3>No, it's no, it's not. This is false. It's both

647
00:35:13.760 --> 00:35:16.519
<v Speaker 3>of them because the way that you know both of

648
00:35:16.559 --> 00:35:20.280
<v Speaker 3>them is the same means tradition. That's why, that's how,

649
00:35:20.360 --> 00:35:20.719
<v Speaker 3>that's what.

650
00:35:20.840 --> 00:35:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's one means, and I agree with you, it's.

651
00:35:22.840 --> 00:35:25.199
<v Speaker 3>The only means. How do you know, Matthew wrote, Matthew.

652
00:35:26.800 --> 00:35:29.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, there's a couple of ways that you could go

653
00:35:29.440 --> 00:35:32.679
<v Speaker 7>about that. Tradition is super helpful for that that, Matthew wrote, Matthew,

654
00:35:33.800 --> 00:35:35.599
<v Speaker 7>but we also have you know.

655
00:35:35.559 --> 00:35:37.639
<v Speaker 8>That it dates to the first century. It doesn't date

656
00:35:37.679 --> 00:35:38.719
<v Speaker 8>to the second or third sevend.

657
00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>A lot of forgeries date and pseudographa date early.

658
00:35:42.320 --> 00:35:44.199
<v Speaker 8>So what yeah, but none of them dates to the

659
00:35:44.199 --> 00:35:44.760
<v Speaker 8>first century?

660
00:35:45.320 --> 00:35:47.679
<v Speaker 3>No, well does How do you know that? That's the criteria?

661
00:35:47.679 --> 00:35:50.679
<v Speaker 3>You're just asserting those things as principles? Are they self?

662
00:35:51.119 --> 00:35:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Are those self evident principles?

663
00:35:54.159 --> 00:35:54.880
<v Speaker 8>No? But nobody.

664
00:35:55.079 --> 00:35:57.159
<v Speaker 7>How do you know the Gospel of Thomas, for example,

665
00:35:57.199 --> 00:35:58.480
<v Speaker 7>this is probably the earliest gospel.

666
00:35:58.920 --> 00:36:01.280
<v Speaker 3>How do you know that because it's old, it's therefore

667
00:36:01.320 --> 00:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>part of the canon. That's what you're asserting these things

668
00:36:03.480 --> 00:36:07.039
<v Speaker 3>as if they're self evident. How on what basis?

669
00:36:07.400 --> 00:36:09.760
<v Speaker 7>You asked me, how do I know that, Matthew roll Matthew,

670
00:36:09.920 --> 00:36:11.400
<v Speaker 7>and one of them is that?

671
00:36:11.480 --> 00:36:11.519
<v Speaker 5>What?

672
00:36:11.719 --> 00:36:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Obviously No, I said that, But I'm making the point

673
00:36:15.039 --> 00:36:17.679
<v Speaker 3>that tradition is necessary. And you conceded that, And then

674
00:36:17.679 --> 00:36:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you said there's other means too, like it's old, Well,

675
00:36:20.960 --> 00:36:23.039
<v Speaker 3>how does it being old tell you that it's canonical.

676
00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:26.400
<v Speaker 3>That's an assumption, because there's fake documents that are old too.

677
00:36:28.760 --> 00:36:30.400
<v Speaker 8>Sure, there is fake doctuments that rule.

678
00:36:30.440 --> 00:36:34.280
<v Speaker 7>But if any fake documents is written to be purported

679
00:36:34.760 --> 00:36:36.400
<v Speaker 7>to be written by an apossible but it's not in

680
00:36:36.400 --> 00:36:37.119
<v Speaker 7>the first century.

681
00:36:37.199 --> 00:36:39.840
<v Speaker 3>How do we know that your list of these principles

682
00:36:39.920 --> 00:36:42.400
<v Speaker 3>is the right list that we're supposed to all follow.

683
00:36:42.559 --> 00:36:46.239
<v Speaker 3>This is the point. This is Protestant self popery. You're

684
00:36:46.239 --> 00:36:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the new pope that's gonna tell us the list. Oh

685
00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you see, I've derived that the church fathers wanted a

686
00:36:52.360 --> 00:36:55.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty two book Old Testament canon even though the majority

687
00:36:56.039 --> 00:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of them don't have that, because I just gave you

688
00:36:58.719 --> 00:37:02.920
<v Speaker 3>church law which was more widespread than individual guys. And

689
00:37:02.960 --> 00:37:05.360
<v Speaker 3>then you're saying, well, who cares what individual guys said?

690
00:37:05.880 --> 00:37:07.679
<v Speaker 3>It's not this guy or that guy or that guy.

691
00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:10.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm not saying who cares the individual I think it's important,

692
00:37:10.880 --> 00:37:13.639
<v Speaker 7>like I think that affenacious. These church fathers also operate

693
00:37:13.760 --> 00:37:15.079
<v Speaker 7>under this principle.

694
00:37:14.639 --> 00:37:16.639
<v Speaker 3>Like, okay, how do you know the principal's true? Where

695
00:37:16.639 --> 00:37:19.199
<v Speaker 3>are you getting it from?

696
00:37:19.360 --> 00:37:21.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, we want to know who the apostles were, who

697
00:37:21.760 --> 00:37:23.840
<v Speaker 7>wrote those texts we get it from.

698
00:37:24.559 --> 00:37:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell now, I thought we were telling the Deutero cannon.

699
00:37:26.480 --> 00:37:27.800
<v Speaker 3>You said, it's twenty two books.

700
00:37:28.320 --> 00:37:30.079
<v Speaker 8>How do we know, Oh, yeah, the Old Testament book?

701
00:37:30.119 --> 00:37:34.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, okay, So there's a number of arguments for Old

702
00:37:34.320 --> 00:37:35.280
<v Speaker 7>Testament canadal.

703
00:37:35.360 --> 00:37:38.079
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, you gave a principle that we want to

704
00:37:38.119 --> 00:37:41.960
<v Speaker 3>do this. What is the basis for your assertion that

705
00:37:41.960 --> 00:37:46.800
<v Speaker 3>that's what we're supposed to follow? How do you know that?

706
00:37:46.960 --> 00:37:48.639
<v Speaker 8>Like, that's what the church fathers?

707
00:37:48.800 --> 00:37:53.599
<v Speaker 3>Who where we received the That's begging the question because

708
00:37:54.000 --> 00:37:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving you countless church fathers that contend with that.

709
00:37:57.159 --> 00:37:57.719
<v Speaker 3>Who's right?

710
00:37:58.239 --> 00:37:58.360
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

711
00:37:58.480 --> 00:37:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Because the church father should it?

712
00:38:01.880 --> 00:38:03.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I know there's other arguments as well.

713
00:38:04.000 --> 00:38:07.440
<v Speaker 7>For example, I'll give you like, there's many arguments.

714
00:38:07.480 --> 00:38:09.960
<v Speaker 3>What's the argument for that principle of the books that

715
00:38:10.079 --> 00:38:13.480
<v Speaker 3>use it's these books this number, what's the argument for that?

716
00:38:13.480 --> 00:38:15.119
<v Speaker 3>That's not circular? How do you know?

717
00:38:16.000 --> 00:38:17.000
<v Speaker 8>The argument is this?

718
00:38:17.559 --> 00:38:21.360
<v Speaker 7>We want to know the canon that the Old Testament canon.

719
00:38:21.280 --> 00:38:23.519
<v Speaker 8>That Jesus and the apostles used. How do we get

720
00:38:23.559 --> 00:38:23.880
<v Speaker 8>to that?

721
00:38:23.960 --> 00:38:26.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, did you know that the Deutero canonical books uh,

722
00:38:26.719 --> 00:38:29.119
<v Speaker 3>excuse me. The Septus includes the du canon.

723
00:38:29.920 --> 00:38:31.480
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I'm aware of that.

724
00:38:31.559 --> 00:38:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Do the Apostles cite the deuterocanonical texts, yes, they did.

725
00:38:37.480 --> 00:38:40.639
<v Speaker 8>They did, they say to the Seuz. I don't not

726
00:38:40.679 --> 00:38:41.320
<v Speaker 8>where that they said to.

727
00:38:41.760 --> 00:38:43.639
<v Speaker 3>You don't even know the New Testament references to the

728
00:38:43.679 --> 00:38:50.199
<v Speaker 3>dudoconical texts. Not explicitly, No, there's many explicit ones. But

729
00:38:50.320 --> 00:38:53.119
<v Speaker 3>what's the basis for your assertion of your axiom? How

730
00:38:53.119 --> 00:38:54.159
<v Speaker 3>do you know that that's the case?

731
00:38:54.639 --> 00:38:55.039
<v Speaker 8>Okay?

732
00:38:55.119 --> 00:38:57.280
<v Speaker 7>So one additional argument I was going to say is,

733
00:38:57.960 --> 00:38:59.920
<v Speaker 7>if we want to know what Jesus and the Apostles

734
00:39:00.480 --> 00:39:05.559
<v Speaker 7>believed was canon, there's some internal evidence in the New Testament,

735
00:39:06.079 --> 00:39:07.039
<v Speaker 7>so you know.

736
00:39:07.599 --> 00:39:09.960
<v Speaker 3>That has not that you understand? The question is prior

737
00:39:10.000 --> 00:39:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to you citing the New Testament, I want to know

738
00:39:12.079 --> 00:39:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the basis for what the list of the Old and

739
00:39:13.920 --> 00:39:16.079
<v Speaker 3>New Testament books are. You're saying, let's go to the

740
00:39:16.119 --> 00:39:18.679
<v Speaker 3>New Testament books. We don't know that they're canon yet.

741
00:39:18.679 --> 00:39:19.639
<v Speaker 3>This is the prior question.

742
00:39:19.760 --> 00:39:21.400
<v Speaker 8>You talk about the twenty two books.

743
00:39:21.480 --> 00:39:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Either one, dude, because it's the same principle for us

744
00:39:24.400 --> 00:39:28.800
<v Speaker 3>as to an authority post apostles to determine and compile

745
00:39:28.960 --> 00:39:32.800
<v Speaker 3>a binding decision, loosing and binding upon the church. The

746
00:39:33.000 --> 00:39:35.079
<v Speaker 3>thousand years of the First the first thousand years of

747
00:39:35.119 --> 00:39:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Christianity has Orthodox church fathers doing that and councils doing that.

748
00:39:39.199 --> 00:39:42.519
<v Speaker 3>You're telling me that's all wrong. Listen to me, mister

749
00:39:42.559 --> 00:39:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Protestant man.

750
00:39:43.840 --> 00:39:47.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, no, I believe I'm operating under the same principles

751
00:39:47.400 --> 00:39:48.719
<v Speaker 7>as Athenaious and these guys.

752
00:39:48.760 --> 00:39:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Why are we supposed to follow Athenasius because there's other

753
00:39:51.400 --> 00:39:54.920
<v Speaker 3>church fathers that disagree with Athenasious and Athenasius says that that.

754
00:39:55.599 --> 00:39:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Athanasius says catech cumans should be catechised with the Doer canon.

755
00:39:58.800 --> 00:40:03.599
<v Speaker 7>Do you believe that, I think says that duder canons

756
00:40:03.599 --> 00:40:05.760
<v Speaker 7>cannot be used for canon for doctrine linkedown.

757
00:40:06.039 --> 00:40:11.119
<v Speaker 3>No, he doesn't, he says, so he wants catechory. He

758
00:40:11.239 --> 00:40:16.239
<v Speaker 3>says catecumans should be catechized with the Dutero canonical text

759
00:40:16.320 --> 00:40:19.280
<v Speaker 3>like Wisdom and serrac But you're telling me that, but

760
00:40:19.639 --> 00:40:23.199
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't learn doctrine from them. Catechumens are learning doctrine.

761
00:40:24.400 --> 00:40:26.639
<v Speaker 8>Well, he says, you can't establish doctrine. Yeah, you can

762
00:40:26.719 --> 00:40:28.239
<v Speaker 8>read it and learn from this. There's a lot of

763
00:40:28.239 --> 00:40:29.480
<v Speaker 8>books you can read learn from it.

764
00:40:29.559 --> 00:40:33.239
<v Speaker 3>I think, why are we supposed to follow Athenais and

765
00:40:33.320 --> 00:40:34.079
<v Speaker 3>not Augustine?

766
00:40:36.840 --> 00:40:40.599
<v Speaker 8>Well, because you can follow anyone.

767
00:40:40.960 --> 00:40:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we can follow any we want exactly, and that's

768
00:40:42.880 --> 00:40:45.320
<v Speaker 3>why I Protestant. All right, we're done, so you can

769
00:40:45.360 --> 00:40:49.599
<v Speaker 3>follow anyone you want. I'm glad you think it's funny.

770
00:40:49.679 --> 00:40:53.320
<v Speaker 3>So thanks for wasting my time with all this ahead

771
00:40:53.360 --> 00:40:53.920
<v Speaker 3>question for you.

772
00:40:54.000 --> 00:40:55.880
<v Speaker 8>One more question for you?

773
00:40:55.960 --> 00:40:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Why are we supposed to follow athenaious over Augustine's cannon?

774
00:41:01.320 --> 00:41:04.599
<v Speaker 8>We're supposed to try and get to the oldest canon possible.

775
00:41:04.320 --> 00:41:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Says who you just keep as certain? How do you

776
00:41:06.039 --> 00:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>know that that's so? Now it's the oldest. That's a fallacy.

777
00:41:08.760 --> 00:41:11.079
<v Speaker 8>We're trying to get to the twenty two canon tradition.

778
00:41:11.199 --> 00:41:12.760
<v Speaker 3>How do you know that it's that you just keep

779
00:41:12.800 --> 00:41:18.559
<v Speaker 3>as certain? Who'se it's twenty two because it's twenty two?

780
00:41:16.920 --> 00:41:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Who Cyril doesn't help your case? He doesn't have your cannon.

781
00:41:22.880 --> 00:41:24.760
<v Speaker 3>He's a bishop. What do you how does he help

782
00:41:24.800 --> 00:41:25.119
<v Speaker 3>your case?

783
00:41:25.840 --> 00:41:27.960
<v Speaker 8>Explicitly says twenty two books?

784
00:41:28.000 --> 00:41:31.079
<v Speaker 3>So what why are we You're just you don't understand.

785
00:41:31.119 --> 00:41:34.519
<v Speaker 3>You keep arbitrarily saying this father, no, this father, no,

786
00:41:34.679 --> 00:41:38.599
<v Speaker 3>this father. On what basis is that right? Because it's

787
00:41:38.639 --> 00:41:41.840
<v Speaker 3>old that's a fallacy.

788
00:41:43.280 --> 00:41:47.639
<v Speaker 8>So I believe it's right based on the multiple traditions

789
00:41:47.679 --> 00:41:48.119
<v Speaker 8>from him.

790
00:41:48.119 --> 00:41:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Now it's multiple traditions, and how do you know which

791
00:41:50.320 --> 00:41:52.239
<v Speaker 3>ones are right? What's your epistemic basis?

792
00:41:55.039 --> 00:41:59.239
<v Speaker 8>Epistemic basis is that all the Church fathers seem to agree.

793
00:41:58.960 --> 00:42:01.000
<v Speaker 3>With all of them, know they don't. Now you're lying,

794
00:42:01.079 --> 00:42:02.880
<v Speaker 3>But let's get out of here. All of them agree.

795
00:42:02.920 --> 00:42:10.039
<v Speaker 3>Come on, we just showed you they don't agree. Waste

796
00:42:10.079 --> 00:42:14.920
<v Speaker 3>of time byzantine?

797
00:42:15.000 --> 00:42:20.400
<v Speaker 14>What hi from astrective astle. So this is about the

798
00:42:20.519 --> 00:42:23.840
<v Speaker 14>topic of you know, Protestants and all that. Like when

799
00:42:23.880 --> 00:42:26.599
<v Speaker 14>I talk to Protestants who know their stuff, they always

800
00:42:26.719 --> 00:42:30.559
<v Speaker 14>use like little disagreements between early Church fathers as a

801
00:42:30.599 --> 00:42:33.800
<v Speaker 14>reason to downplay them. They even sometimes use being quiet

802
00:42:33.840 --> 00:42:36.159
<v Speaker 14>on a certain matter as a reason to disregard that. Yes,

803
00:42:36.239 --> 00:42:39.440
<v Speaker 14>the early Church believe the stuff that the Orthodox believe. However,

804
00:42:39.480 --> 00:42:42.079
<v Speaker 14>one thing that sort of scares me jay is the

805
00:42:42.079 --> 00:42:45.360
<v Speaker 14>fact that they use this idea that John Chris, sorry

806
00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:48.840
<v Speaker 14>John Christosten had a sort of a lesser view of

807
00:42:48.920 --> 00:42:50.639
<v Speaker 14>Mary than you know, say, I talk to us than

808
00:42:50.719 --> 00:42:54.360
<v Speaker 14>most orthodox that I talk to do, can you like

809
00:42:54.400 --> 00:42:55.360
<v Speaker 14>sort of address.

810
00:42:55.079 --> 00:42:55.840
<v Speaker 9>Like you know what I mean?

811
00:42:55.880 --> 00:42:57.800
<v Speaker 3>It's like again' It's like I think a lot of

812
00:42:57.840 --> 00:43:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Protestants go to the Church father and treat the Church

813
00:43:01.400 --> 00:43:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Fathers with a Protestant mindset the way they would treat

814
00:43:04.480 --> 00:43:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. And we do not believe that the Church

815
00:43:08.039 --> 00:43:12.639
<v Speaker 3>Fathers are infallible or got everything right. In fact, the

816
00:43:12.760 --> 00:43:17.119
<v Speaker 3>variations and debates about the canon itself shows that many

817
00:43:17.199 --> 00:43:19.719
<v Speaker 3>of them got it wrong. But we don't say that

818
00:43:19.719 --> 00:43:22.159
<v Speaker 3>they're not saints or that they're not church fathers because

819
00:43:22.159 --> 00:43:25.639
<v Speaker 3>they got these varying canon lists wrong. So we don't

820
00:43:25.639 --> 00:43:29.679
<v Speaker 3>have this strict attitude. But Protestants quote mine and cherry

821
00:43:29.679 --> 00:43:32.880
<v Speaker 3>pick to prove Protestantism. That's it, and they exclude the

822
00:43:32.880 --> 00:43:36.119
<v Speaker 3>things that go against product. So I've not done a

823
00:43:36.159 --> 00:43:38.840
<v Speaker 3>study on Saint John Christism's view of Mary, but I

824
00:43:38.840 --> 00:43:40.840
<v Speaker 3>won't have a problem saying that he got it wrong,

825
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:43.639
<v Speaker 3>just like Jerome got things wrong, just like Gregor Vnissa

826
00:43:43.679 --> 00:43:46.599
<v Speaker 3>got things wrong, Augustine got things wrong. So we're I

827
00:43:46.599 --> 00:43:51.000
<v Speaker 3>think we're a lot more flexible and realistic with admitting

828
00:43:51.280 --> 00:43:53.960
<v Speaker 3>that church fathers got things wrong. And the iron is

829
00:43:53.960 --> 00:43:56.639
<v Speaker 3>that Protestants have an even lower view of the Church

830
00:43:56.639 --> 00:43:58.960
<v Speaker 3>fathers than we do, and they're going to just sit

831
00:43:59.000 --> 00:44:01.920
<v Speaker 3>there and pick appanations as canon. But I mean, it's

832
00:44:01.960 --> 00:44:04.840
<v Speaker 3>because it's Cyril said it, because another guy, but it's

833
00:44:04.880 --> 00:44:05.920
<v Speaker 3>not Augustine.

834
00:44:05.920 --> 00:44:10.360
<v Speaker 14>It's annoying when they do this, isn't it. Yeah go ahead, yeah, yeah,

835
00:44:10.360 --> 00:44:11.559
<v Speaker 14>it's very annoying.

836
00:44:11.239 --> 00:44:13.519
<v Speaker 2>When they do that. So, like.

837
00:44:14.960 --> 00:44:17.760
<v Speaker 14>So, like before coming into this sort of like like

838
00:44:18.079 --> 00:44:20.480
<v Speaker 14>mindset of I always thought, well, if the church father

839
00:44:20.519 --> 00:44:22.599
<v Speaker 14>said it, there must be sort of like a union

840
00:44:22.639 --> 00:44:25.639
<v Speaker 14>between what they believed. And then prost and Church started

841
00:44:25.679 --> 00:44:28.840
<v Speaker 14>showing me that there was disagreements among them, and so

842
00:44:29.000 --> 00:44:29.920
<v Speaker 14>I got a bit scared.

843
00:44:29.960 --> 00:44:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought, oh, how am I going to do this?

844
00:44:32.280 --> 00:44:35.000
<v Speaker 14>And then I started listening to people like you and

845
00:44:35.079 --> 00:44:39.079
<v Speaker 14>like and other people who speak on them, and I

846
00:44:39.159 --> 00:44:42.400
<v Speaker 14>realized it's okay, Like, it's okay that sometimes they got

847
00:44:42.400 --> 00:44:45.559
<v Speaker 14>stuff wrong. They're not fallible. They're not like they're not God.

848
00:44:45.480 --> 00:44:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Or any exactly.

849
00:44:47.840 --> 00:44:48.639
<v Speaker 2>They're not infallible.

850
00:44:48.719 --> 00:44:51.599
<v Speaker 14>So I'm no longer scared by the fact that they

851
00:44:51.760 --> 00:44:53.800
<v Speaker 14>made mistakes and that they disagree with each other from

852
00:44:53.840 --> 00:44:57.760
<v Speaker 14>certain options. However, like, so this is why I got

853
00:44:57.840 --> 00:45:00.519
<v Speaker 14>like the idea of like John Crosostigty because actually sort

854
00:45:00.559 --> 00:45:02.920
<v Speaker 14>of scared me because me myself, I think I have

855
00:45:02.960 --> 00:45:05.239
<v Speaker 14>a bit of a high view of the theos.

856
00:45:06.880 --> 00:45:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Like but yeah, so thanks for that.

857
00:45:10.760 --> 00:45:12.360
<v Speaker 14>But I will I will say this when it comes

858
00:45:12.360 --> 00:45:15.320
<v Speaker 14>to Protestants, though, they always try to use tactics to

859
00:45:15.360 --> 00:45:18.480
<v Speaker 14>make young believers like myself sort of drift away from

860
00:45:18.480 --> 00:45:19.880
<v Speaker 14>the faith because they think we're.

861
00:45:19.679 --> 00:45:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Demonic for some reason.

862
00:45:22.360 --> 00:45:24.039
<v Speaker 8>It's very deceptive to wouldn't wouldn't it be.

863
00:45:24.079 --> 00:45:24.559
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it.

864
00:45:26.519 --> 00:45:29.360
<v Speaker 3>You're saying Protestants use deception to try to get you

865
00:45:29.719 --> 00:45:32.599
<v Speaker 3>to leave or the lead Orthodoxy.

866
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:35.360
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, sometimes they try to deceive me a bit.

867
00:45:35.440 --> 00:45:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Like I sometimes meet.

868
00:45:37.960 --> 00:45:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Like like like a.

869
00:45:39.360 --> 00:45:44.719
<v Speaker 14>Protestant who's KJV only kinds of people just like exactly

870
00:45:44.719 --> 00:45:45.679
<v Speaker 14>it as a cult exactly.

871
00:45:45.920 --> 00:45:47.119
<v Speaker 2>I try to tell them this, but.

872
00:45:47.159 --> 00:45:50.960
<v Speaker 14>Like I don't even know, like I don't know, maybe

873
00:45:50.960 --> 00:45:53.320
<v Speaker 14>I'm maybe I'm maybe I'm just speaking like out of

874
00:45:53.320 --> 00:45:55.599
<v Speaker 14>my butt, But I have to I have to say

875
00:45:55.599 --> 00:45:57.320
<v Speaker 14>that they can they can be they can be pretty

876
00:45:57.320 --> 00:45:59.119
<v Speaker 14>smart when they're trying to make the Catholics in the

877
00:45:59.199 --> 00:46:01.679
<v Speaker 14>Orthodoxy and like wrong about Mary and how tradition and

878
00:46:01.719 --> 00:46:04.480
<v Speaker 14>about the idea of the canon. Right, So, like, would

879
00:46:04.480 --> 00:46:06.519
<v Speaker 14>you agree that sometimes they do have to use deceptions or.

880
00:46:10.599 --> 00:46:17.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if they have to, but they tend to, right, Yeah, right,

881
00:46:17.800 --> 00:46:21.719
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, appreciate your comments. I'm trying to find here.

882
00:46:22.920 --> 00:46:25.960
<v Speaker 3>So here's it's catechetical Lecture four. I couldn't remember which

883
00:46:26.039 --> 00:46:29.119
<v Speaker 3>lecture it was where he talks about the canon. And

884
00:46:29.360 --> 00:46:38.079
<v Speaker 3>let's see, he does include Barrack and he does not

885
00:46:38.280 --> 00:46:40.679
<v Speaker 3>list the Book of Revelation, and so I just do

886
00:46:40.800 --> 00:46:44.639
<v Speaker 3>not understand how any But then he says, oh, but

887
00:46:45.199 --> 00:46:48.920
<v Speaker 3>we're only going to look to him for the Old

888
00:46:48.920 --> 00:46:51.519
<v Speaker 3>Testament canon. Now wait a minute, if you're going to

889
00:46:51.559 --> 00:46:55.079
<v Speaker 3>cite Cyril, why is it only Cyril's Old Testament cannon

890
00:46:55.119 --> 00:46:58.119
<v Speaker 3>and not Cyril's New Testament. Oh, because Cyril doesn't have

891
00:46:58.119 --> 00:47:01.239
<v Speaker 3>the Book of Revelation, So that doesn't help you any

892
00:47:01.400 --> 00:47:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Sola scriptura is the argument that a final, fixed, written

893
00:47:06.719 --> 00:47:11.480
<v Speaker 3>word of God is the sole final authority for the church.

894
00:47:12.239 --> 00:47:14.719
<v Speaker 3>And the point is that if the church does not

895
00:47:15.000 --> 00:47:20.719
<v Speaker 3>possess that in Toto for many centuries, then the church

896
00:47:20.960 --> 00:47:24.760
<v Speaker 3>was not operating on sola scriptura. If the church was

897
00:47:24.840 --> 00:47:28.119
<v Speaker 3>not operating on soul scriptura for centuries, then it is

898
00:47:28.159 --> 00:47:34.840
<v Speaker 3>not true. It's that simple, and just because by the way,

899
00:47:34.880 --> 00:47:37.760
<v Speaker 3>if I recall and I read all the Catecortical Lectures,

900
00:47:37.840 --> 00:47:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I remember making notes about this because I read it

901
00:47:40.400 --> 00:47:45.000
<v Speaker 3>when I was looking into Catholicism and leaving Protestantism. I

902
00:47:45.039 --> 00:47:48.599
<v Speaker 3>remember making notes. I'm pretty sure he still cites them,

903
00:47:49.000 --> 00:47:52.079
<v Speaker 3>and even to prove arguments. So even the Church Fathers

904
00:47:52.119 --> 00:47:54.880
<v Speaker 3>are not even consistent if they don't include the Duro canon,

905
00:47:55.559 --> 00:47:57.800
<v Speaker 3>because many of them will still cite the Deuro Cannon

906
00:47:57.840 --> 00:48:00.679
<v Speaker 3>to prove their points in their positions. Well, let's see,

907
00:48:00.760 --> 00:48:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna I hate to use the ai, but I'm

908
00:48:03.320 --> 00:48:05.880
<v Speaker 3>just going to do it to make it quick. Let's see,

909
00:48:05.960 --> 00:48:13.480
<v Speaker 3>does serial of Jerusalem. Because I don't have my church

910
00:48:13.519 --> 00:48:15.639
<v Speaker 3>Father's set here, it's at the other place, I can't

911
00:48:15.639 --> 00:48:18.440
<v Speaker 3>pull out my volume and look it up. But if

912
00:48:18.440 --> 00:48:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you do have the Chaft set, you should have an

913
00:48:20.960 --> 00:48:23.840
<v Speaker 3>appendix in the back of the Catechetical Lectures which should

914
00:48:23.880 --> 00:48:29.079
<v Speaker 3>show you any places where he cites dud canonical texts,

915
00:48:30.760 --> 00:48:35.159
<v Speaker 3>and even Jerome, if I recall, will cite duterocanonical texts

916
00:48:35.159 --> 00:48:37.159
<v Speaker 3>as well. And it's like well, he doesn't believe it

917
00:48:37.199 --> 00:48:41.199
<v Speaker 3>proves doctrine. Well, maybe he's being inconsistent. Do you ever

918
00:48:41.239 --> 00:48:50.800
<v Speaker 3>think about that, because we don't have any problem in

919
00:48:50.920 --> 00:48:54.159
<v Speaker 3>meaning that the Church father are inconsistent. Does Serial of

920
00:48:54.199 --> 00:49:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Jerusalem cite dutero canonical books in his writings? Now it's

921
00:49:03.039 --> 00:49:06.840
<v Speaker 3>if he is to whether Rock has been pretty good

922
00:49:06.840 --> 00:49:10.400
<v Speaker 3>about a lot of this and I'm having I'm only

923
00:49:10.400 --> 00:49:12.039
<v Speaker 3>doing this because I don't have my chefs out here.

924
00:49:12.079 --> 00:49:20.119
<v Speaker 3>I apologize Cyril does cite them. Let's see kind of

925
00:49:20.119 --> 00:49:24.599
<v Speaker 3>cut electures four thirty six. He cites Wisdom and Syric.

926
00:49:24.320 --> 00:49:41.880
<v Speaker 9>So let's see.

927
00:49:45.440 --> 00:49:48.880
<v Speaker 3>So no, he does have Barrack right, so that that

928
00:49:48.920 --> 00:49:51.440
<v Speaker 3>doesn't fit the Protestant canon. Well, but it's just one book.

929
00:49:51.519 --> 00:49:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Well no, wait a minute, I thought we believe in

930
00:49:53.079 --> 00:49:57.800
<v Speaker 3>solar scripturer. If you're a sol scripturer, you know, infallible

931
00:49:57.800 --> 00:50:01.599
<v Speaker 3>Word of God proponent, I'll only need one book to

932
00:50:01.639 --> 00:50:07.119
<v Speaker 3>disqualify it, because if Barrack isn't inspired scripture in your

933
00:50:07.199 --> 00:50:10.599
<v Speaker 3>Protestant view, and he's including it, that doesn't afford you

934
00:50:10.679 --> 00:50:14.119
<v Speaker 3>any any help. Now, I don't know where Groc is

935
00:50:14.119 --> 00:50:26.320
<v Speaker 3>getting wisdom, though Rock says. I think Rock's wrong there.

936
00:50:37.480 --> 00:50:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I want these specific citations. Can anybody does anybody have

937
00:50:40.880 --> 00:50:42.719
<v Speaker 3>a specific I know he cites it, I know in

938
00:50:43.480 --> 00:50:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm like ninety percent sure that he cites it in

939
00:50:46.840 --> 00:50:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the Catechetical Lectures. So well, but it doesn't prove doctrine. Yeah,

940
00:50:53.000 --> 00:50:55.880
<v Speaker 3>but I mean, I don't understand how Cyril helps you

941
00:50:55.960 --> 00:50:57.639
<v Speaker 3>at all. He doesn't have the Book of Revelations, so

942
00:50:57.679 --> 00:51:23.239
<v Speaker 3>what Oh he includes the dou econonical sections of Daniel too.

943
00:51:23.280 --> 00:51:32.800
<v Speaker 3>That's weird. Let's see, we need some way to search.

944
00:51:33.159 --> 00:51:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know does anybody in the chat have I

945
00:51:35.320 --> 00:51:37.679
<v Speaker 3>know that this exists. I just don't have in front

946
00:51:37.719 --> 00:52:01.480
<v Speaker 3>of me anybody have a reference to that. No, I

947
00:52:01.480 --> 00:52:03.559
<v Speaker 3>mean it's you know, there's no question if you read

948
00:52:03.559 --> 00:52:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the Catechetical Lectures that I've read them all, like, there's

949
00:52:05.840 --> 00:52:09.400
<v Speaker 3>no question that. I mean, it's theology is not remotely Protestant.

950
00:52:09.440 --> 00:52:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Everything in that is one percent orthodox theology. But again

951
00:52:15.239 --> 00:52:18.559
<v Speaker 3>it's it's not the Protestant canon. So I don't understand. Well,

952
00:52:18.599 --> 00:52:20.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's closer. Well, so now you're moving the goalpost.

953
00:52:21.119 --> 00:52:23.199
<v Speaker 3>I thought you're a you're trying to prove the Protestant

954
00:52:23.199 --> 00:52:25.639
<v Speaker 3>canon or just something close to it. And how do

955
00:52:25.719 --> 00:52:28.960
<v Speaker 3>we know that closer makes it right? Like if it's wrong,

956
00:52:29.000 --> 00:52:34.199
<v Speaker 3>it's wrong. So anyway we can we can put underneath

957
00:52:34.199 --> 00:52:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the comments. Later on, I'll look and find Cyril Jerusalem

958
00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:41.760
<v Speaker 3>referencing deerconical text in the catechetical lectures. I know he does.

959
00:52:41.840 --> 00:52:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I know he does. I'm like ninety percent sure, go ahead, Hey.

960
00:52:46.199 --> 00:52:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Jay, thanks for bringing me on.

961
00:52:49.199 --> 00:52:55.480
<v Speaker 15>So if the church fathers had debates on scripture, how

962
00:52:55.480 --> 00:53:00.159
<v Speaker 15>do we know what is the correct interpretation for like

963
00:53:00.199 --> 00:53:05.400
<v Speaker 15>all these different passages that even Protestants debat up amost themselves.

964
00:53:06.559 --> 00:53:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's like Saint Vincent of Lorenz says that in

965
00:53:09.760 --> 00:53:15.000
<v Speaker 3>his commandatory he talks about we believe what is believed

966
00:53:15.000 --> 00:53:18.480
<v Speaker 3>by everyone at all places, at all times. So that's

967
00:53:18.559 --> 00:53:23.679
<v Speaker 3>what universal means in the Orthodox sense, and that's a

968
00:53:23.719 --> 00:53:26.679
<v Speaker 3>helpful guide, but it doesn't tell us a lot of specifics.

969
00:53:26.880 --> 00:53:30.719
<v Speaker 3>So there will be debate over various Bible verses, there

970
00:53:30.760 --> 00:53:33.880
<v Speaker 3>will be disagreements, but there's not going to be disagreements

971
00:53:33.960 --> 00:53:38.639
<v Speaker 3>or debate when the Church formulates and settles big issues.

972
00:53:39.199 --> 00:53:42.800
<v Speaker 3>So nicea happens. Right, there's a lot of debate about

973
00:53:43.000 --> 00:53:47.039
<v Speaker 3>Jesus's status that settles that issue, okay, and that becomes

974
00:53:47.119 --> 00:53:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the codified belief for everybody. So ecumitical councils are the

975
00:53:51.840 --> 00:53:55.079
<v Speaker 3>highest level of authority, and the Church Fathers help us.

976
00:53:55.119 --> 00:53:59.360
<v Speaker 3>They have you know, countless commentaries, countless discussions, but you

977
00:53:59.400 --> 00:54:02.000
<v Speaker 3>will find place is where church fathers disagree with one

978
00:54:02.000 --> 00:54:06.400
<v Speaker 3>another on a specific passage. And so again, no church

979
00:54:06.440 --> 00:54:09.480
<v Speaker 3>fathers infallible. No church father has it all right and

980
00:54:09.480 --> 00:54:12.159
<v Speaker 3>it all figured out. The more you read the Church fathers,

981
00:54:12.159 --> 00:54:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and I've been reading them for twenty five years, the

982
00:54:14.440 --> 00:54:17.159
<v Speaker 3>more you will see I'm not trying to degrade them,

983
00:54:17.199 --> 00:54:20.079
<v Speaker 3>but they were fallible men, even if they're saints, even

984
00:54:20.119 --> 00:54:25.039
<v Speaker 3>if they're great theologians. To treat them in some sort

985
00:54:25.079 --> 00:54:29.159
<v Speaker 3>of like unrealistic way, I think damages our positioned. And

986
00:54:29.199 --> 00:54:32.079
<v Speaker 3>there's some Orthodox people who do this where they act like, oh,

987
00:54:32.119 --> 00:54:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the Church Fathers and saints never disagreed, and so if

988
00:54:35.039 --> 00:54:37.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a parent contradiction, it's not real. I can look

989
00:54:37.960 --> 00:54:40.159
<v Speaker 3>at their list of canons right here and tell that, well,

990
00:54:40.159 --> 00:54:42.599
<v Speaker 3>they have different canons, so they can't all be right.

991
00:54:43.559 --> 00:54:48.760
<v Speaker 3>So again it's like expecting having unrealistic expectations like as

992
00:54:48.800 --> 00:54:51.320
<v Speaker 3>if and a lot of times when Protestants convert to

993
00:54:51.440 --> 00:54:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Rome or to Orthodoxy, they have the same mindset where

994
00:54:53.840 --> 00:54:56.559
<v Speaker 3>they expect that, Oh, I'm going to just quote mind

995
00:54:56.559 --> 00:54:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the church fathers and they're never going to have any

996
00:54:58.039 --> 00:55:00.280
<v Speaker 3>disagreements because they all teach the same thing. No, they don't.

997
00:55:01.039 --> 00:55:01.159
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

998
00:55:01.400 --> 00:55:03.599
<v Speaker 3>And after you spend you know, a few decades in

999
00:55:03.679 --> 00:55:06.159
<v Speaker 3>these things, you're gonna notice that they don't always agree.

1000
00:55:06.400 --> 00:55:10.000
<v Speaker 3>And there's no easy answer to you know, well, how

1001
00:55:10.000 --> 00:55:12.960
<v Speaker 3>do we know what the right interpretation over verses? You

1002
00:55:13.039 --> 00:55:15.119
<v Speaker 3>got to be patient, You got to ask God to

1003
00:55:15.199 --> 00:55:16.760
<v Speaker 3>guide you at the end of the day. That's the

1004
00:55:16.760 --> 00:55:18.320
<v Speaker 3>only way to know. Ben Ella, what's up?

1005
00:55:18.320 --> 00:55:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Man?

1006
00:55:18.760 --> 00:55:26.199
<v Speaker 3>Last one before we close it out tonight, all the

1007
00:55:26.280 --> 00:55:30.119
<v Speaker 3>oh five bucks snate Candling church is Kennon church Father

1008
00:55:30.639 --> 00:55:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Drake malfoy said, so well, might as well follow him

1009
00:55:34.320 --> 00:55:37.559
<v Speaker 3>as well as anybody else. Theology Explorer two dollars. Don't

1010
00:55:37.599 --> 00:55:42.960
<v Speaker 3>forget about James Thora's dead. Bring out wisdom to it

1011
00:55:43.000 --> 00:55:46.239
<v Speaker 3>always shuts down Protestant arguments. Well, I mean, they're just

1012
00:55:46.280 --> 00:55:49.079
<v Speaker 3>gonna say so what so it's similar to what Paul wrote,

1013
00:55:50.320 --> 00:55:52.239
<v Speaker 3>or it's a prophetive Christ. So Wisdom one and two

1014
00:55:52.280 --> 00:55:55.239
<v Speaker 3>and other chapters of wisdom are like perfectly parallel to

1015
00:55:55.280 --> 00:55:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Romans prophetive Christ. They don't care if there's a they'll say, well,

1016
00:55:58.920 --> 00:56:01.599
<v Speaker 3>there might be pagan prophecies that I mean, it's part

1017
00:56:01.639 --> 00:56:05.159
<v Speaker 3>of scripture. Mark Kamowski five dollars. The point is that

1018
00:56:05.199 --> 00:56:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Protestants don't have any coherent criteria as to how and

1019
00:56:10.519 --> 00:56:15.400
<v Speaker 3>why and what scripture is. It's all just arbitrary, all conflicting,

1020
00:56:15.920 --> 00:56:19.679
<v Speaker 3>and it's just like, well, follow me, I'm the one right,

1021
00:56:19.679 --> 00:56:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Frankish Malcaifi bucks something angered me as a Catholic that

1022
00:56:22.199 --> 00:56:25.880
<v Speaker 3>was a manatory observance of Guadalupe. I'm not Mexican. Catholicism

1023
00:56:25.960 --> 00:56:29.079
<v Speaker 3>is super ethnocentric. Obviously, that guy was just being totally

1024
00:56:29.079 --> 00:56:31.079
<v Speaker 3>bad faith for not admitting or acting like he didn't

1025
00:56:31.119 --> 00:56:33.119
<v Speaker 3>know what I was asking. Wallhim single five dollars. If

1026
00:56:33.119 --> 00:56:36.039
<v Speaker 3>I can very orthodoxy, can I celebrate Protestant Valentine with

1027
00:56:36.079 --> 00:56:40.400
<v Speaker 3>my family? I think your priests would probably give you

1028
00:56:40.440 --> 00:56:42.880
<v Speaker 3>a blessing for that, not but you had to ask him,

1029
00:56:42.920 --> 00:56:47.880
<v Speaker 3>not ten dollars. You felt like I was being passive

1030
00:56:47.880 --> 00:56:51.440
<v Speaker 3>aggressive and jabbing at you. No, you were obviously asking

1031
00:56:51.559 --> 00:56:57.599
<v Speaker 3>questions and sending jabs that you knew would be annoying,

1032
00:56:57.760 --> 00:57:00.480
<v Speaker 3>and then you're playing a victim. When I tell you

1033
00:57:00.559 --> 00:57:03.519
<v Speaker 3>to stop doing it, you get so pissy because of

1034
00:57:03.559 --> 00:57:06.280
<v Speaker 3>interactions that were in the past. Yes, because you're bringing

1035
00:57:06.320 --> 00:57:09.519
<v Speaker 3>the same dumb arguments as last time. Don't be a

1036
00:57:09.559 --> 00:57:13.599
<v Speaker 3>bitch and unblock me. You got me all wrong. We're good, man,

1037
00:57:13.679 --> 00:57:15.679
<v Speaker 3>You go your way, you go do your thing. I'm good.

1038
00:57:16.239 --> 00:57:19.360
<v Speaker 3>W a n ghaf ten dollars. Is itreticably the New

1039
00:57:19.400 --> 00:57:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Covenant applied since the beginning of creation? No, the New

1040
00:57:22.400 --> 00:57:27.639
<v Speaker 3>Covenant is Christ's covenant and it was always operative. Jesus

1041
00:57:27.679 --> 00:57:29.719
<v Speaker 3>always existed the trinities in the Old Testament. No that

1042
00:57:29.800 --> 00:57:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean Abraham had faith in the Trinity. Abraham was

1043
00:57:32.039 --> 00:57:35.679
<v Speaker 3>saved by Jesus. Van five dollars. Roman Catholics. This is

1044
00:57:35.719 --> 00:57:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholics, finest ladies and gentlemen. No argument, just

1045
00:57:38.920 --> 00:57:41.960
<v Speaker 3>passive aggressive, playing victim. He calls Jay a little bitch,

1046
00:57:42.360 --> 00:57:45.119
<v Speaker 3>but he's projecting pathetic. This is what they always do.

1047
00:57:45.280 --> 00:57:48.800
<v Speaker 3>They wonder why I get heated with them, because it's

1048
00:57:48.880 --> 00:57:50.880
<v Speaker 3>because the way you're acting. Man, you can't just come

1049
00:57:50.920 --> 00:57:53.000
<v Speaker 3>on here and say what your point is and say, look,

1050
00:57:53.880 --> 00:57:57.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the ep is an inconsistent position. It's not apostolic.

1051
00:57:57.039 --> 00:57:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Why you just say that and said all this tone policing,

1052
00:57:59.480 --> 00:58:02.239
<v Speaker 3>acting like a woman osmotic? Ten dollars. Should I stay

1053
00:58:02.239 --> 00:58:04.960
<v Speaker 3>away from the Greek Orthodox Church because of a Pita foos?

1054
00:58:05.760 --> 00:58:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I would be weary of being underneath him? But you

1055
00:58:10.000 --> 00:58:13.639
<v Speaker 3>can check out the local priests. Drago passport two dollars.

1056
00:58:13.719 --> 00:58:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Get this line ball out? They got here, Martyr Steven

1057
00:58:17.400 --> 00:58:21.119
<v Speaker 3>hundred se k unrelated question, what's your favorite theology book?

1058
00:58:23.079 --> 00:58:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I honestly don't have one that favorite man.

1059
00:58:26.280 --> 00:58:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Have you heard of the book Rediscovering Orthodoxy in the

1060
00:58:29.239 --> 00:58:33.079
<v Speaker 3>Middle of Heretics and Acumenists by doctor Stamatis? I have not,

1061
00:58:34.000 --> 00:58:36.119
<v Speaker 3>but thank you for the recommendation. Paul five dollars. Do

1062
00:58:36.159 --> 00:58:38.599
<v Speaker 3>you have issues with the oc Are there issues with OCA?

1063
00:58:39.480 --> 00:58:39.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1064
00:58:39.719 --> 00:58:42.719
<v Speaker 3>You can look back at my channel for previous OCIA discussions.

1065
00:58:43.880 --> 00:58:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Jordan two dollars. You missed my last chat, Habibi. I

1066
00:58:49.880 --> 00:59:01.079
<v Speaker 3>thought i'd read dr chat after Lord Voldemort. Is there

1067
00:59:01.079 --> 00:59:04.159
<v Speaker 3>any possibility that you work with an Orthodox media network?

1068
00:59:04.440 --> 00:59:09.519
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. I mean, I'm not technically not

1069
00:59:10.440 --> 00:59:16.679
<v Speaker 3>doing Fourth Hour, so now I'm happy doing what I

1070
00:59:16.800 --> 00:59:18.880
<v Speaker 3>do and working for myself. I don't want to have

1071
00:59:18.960 --> 00:59:21.960
<v Speaker 3>a boss, and I enjoy writing for Sam Hyde, so

1072
00:59:22.119 --> 00:59:27.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing everything I want to do. We got that,

1073
00:59:27.679 --> 00:59:34.679
<v Speaker 3>We got that. Hello, Jay, the Mormon talk had me debt,

1074
00:59:35.320 --> 00:59:38.639
<v Speaker 3>dying and laughter. How do they accept Justice Smith inserting

1075
00:59:38.679 --> 00:59:41.559
<v Speaker 3>himself into the Bible. It turns out they actually believe

1076
00:59:42.119 --> 00:59:45.719
<v Speaker 3>that a prophet can correct and write himself into text.

1077
00:59:45.800 --> 00:59:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I kid you not, And they don't see

1078
00:59:47.880 --> 00:59:51.000
<v Speaker 3>what that's a problem. Cole Marshall, we read that when

1079
00:59:51.079 --> 01:00:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Serbia fifteen dollars take you so much? Steve Grady twenty dollars. Oh,

1080
01:00:01.800 --> 01:00:03.920
<v Speaker 3>we did that and be shocked three dollars. Is it

1081
01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:06.440
<v Speaker 3>better to go to a Randy Balls church in the

1082
01:00:06.559 --> 01:00:09.880
<v Speaker 3>South or to not go at all? No, it's better

1083
01:00:09.960 --> 01:00:13.400
<v Speaker 3>to not go. The nearest Orthodock church is an hour

1084
01:00:13.400 --> 01:00:18.159
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Well, that's actually not that bad. So no,

1085
01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:20.519
<v Speaker 3>you can't go to Baptist Church of God churches. That

1086
01:00:20.559 --> 01:00:23.760
<v Speaker 3>stuff's crazy. You got to just make some time and

1087
01:00:23.880 --> 01:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>drive the worth our church when you can't haul in

1088
01:00:26.880 --> 01:00:30.079
<v Speaker 3>the goods five bucks. Did you see the conversation between

1089
01:00:30.159 --> 01:00:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Jenco and Voice of Reason. No, man, I don't watch

1090
01:00:32.280 --> 01:00:34.719
<v Speaker 3>any of these people you think I watched Voice of Reasons.

1091
01:00:35.679 --> 01:00:38.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't watch these people. It was a bad look

1092
01:00:38.119 --> 01:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>for the Catholics. Maybe you should go on their podcasts. Man,

1093
01:00:41.519 --> 01:00:43.239
<v Speaker 3>these people don't want me on their podcasts. What are

1094
01:00:43.239 --> 01:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you talking about?

1095
01:00:44.599 --> 01:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1096
01:00:47.880 --> 01:00:51.199
<v Speaker 3>Grace and five dollars. I just started reading anti Nicee

1097
01:00:51.599 --> 01:00:55.559
<v Speaker 3>Church fathers. From my understanding, Clement's Epistles of Corinthians is

1098
01:00:55.599 --> 01:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the same Clement Paul mentions and Philippians. What's the consensus.

1099
01:01:00.360 --> 01:01:02.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's a traditional view. I don't know that

1100
01:01:02.079 --> 01:01:04.639
<v Speaker 3>there is a consensus. What is the evidence that it's not.

1101
01:01:05.519 --> 01:01:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a textual scholar, so I would defer to

1102
01:01:08.559 --> 01:01:13.519
<v Speaker 3>the church's tradition that it is O'Brien's kayak. Five dollars.

1103
01:01:13.559 --> 01:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Every time I protest of debates, I swear it always

1104
01:01:15.360 --> 01:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>devolves into them tone policing because their theology is feels based.

1105
01:01:19.480 --> 01:01:19.519
<v Speaker 5>No.

1106
01:01:19.639 --> 01:01:22.679
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, when they start feeling bad, they blame you and

1107
01:01:23.320 --> 01:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>try to play victim. And that's because Protestism is very

1108
01:01:27.840 --> 01:01:31.360
<v Speaker 3>much based on feelings. Absolutely, Arisola, five dollars. Thank you

1109
01:01:31.480 --> 01:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>all your content. You're the goat. God bless us start

1110
01:01:34.480 --> 01:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood looking forward to two and three. Thank you Glitchy

1111
01:01:40.079 --> 01:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>rhythm two dollars. He said, don't be a bitch, unblock me.

1112
01:01:43.079 --> 01:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Good try bro no face kill at ten dollars. I've

1113
01:01:48.039 --> 01:01:51.559
<v Speaker 3>been reading thinking Orthodox. I don't know. I haven't read

1114
01:01:51.599 --> 01:01:54.119
<v Speaker 3>that the author made the claim that the church didn't

1115
01:01:54.159 --> 01:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>make the claim Marios without sin. Well, he's talking about

1116
01:02:01.800 --> 01:02:06.719
<v Speaker 3>immaculate conception. So Mary is the Spotles virgin in that

1117
01:02:06.840 --> 01:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>she didn't commit actual sin. I haven't read the books.

1118
01:02:10.400 --> 01:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to give him the best charitable interpretation that

1119
01:02:12.960 --> 01:02:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I would assume. He means actual sin is different from

1120
01:02:16.360 --> 01:02:19.519
<v Speaker 3>original sin. Rom mccallach's believe that Mary has immaculate conception

1121
01:02:19.679 --> 01:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and she's exempted from original sin. Orthodox believe she had

1122
01:02:22.840 --> 01:02:25.079
<v Speaker 3>the effects of original sin, but she did not commit

1123
01:02:25.119 --> 01:02:32.239
<v Speaker 3>an actual sin. Alula five dollars. Thank you, Jay, Thank

1124
01:02:32.280 --> 01:02:35.239
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Thomas B. Two dollars. Read my earlier

1125
01:02:35.320 --> 01:02:37.679
<v Speaker 3>super chat. I'm trying, man, there's a whole bunch here

1126
01:02:37.719 --> 01:02:41.519
<v Speaker 3>that if you barely scroll at rolls past a bunch

1127
01:02:41.519 --> 01:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of them. Let's see your previous super chat. Well, I

1128
01:02:49.840 --> 01:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>was going to try to get out of here. Here

1129
01:02:52.039 --> 01:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>we go, Thomas B. Five dollars. How our bishops that

1130
01:02:54.360 --> 01:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>allow contraception or chrismate those who aren't fully triple immersed

1131
01:02:57.519 --> 01:03:01.199
<v Speaker 3>to be viewed. I mean, we're not rigorous, so like

1132
01:03:01.280 --> 01:03:07.519
<v Speaker 3>you can't control how they do the baptism properly, and

1133
01:03:09.440 --> 01:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>contraception is not promoted by the Orthodox Church. But there

1134
01:03:13.360 --> 01:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>might be situations where there are people who are allowed

1135
01:03:17.639 --> 01:03:22.159
<v Speaker 3>in some cases that because of economia. Roman Catholics don't

1136
01:03:22.239 --> 01:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>understand the principle of economia except when it's the pope

1137
01:03:25.119 --> 01:03:27.559
<v Speaker 3>doing whatever he wants. By the way, suddenly Roman Catholics

1138
01:03:27.599 --> 01:03:30.559
<v Speaker 3>are all about economia, and pope can do whatever he wants.

1139
01:03:30.679 --> 01:03:35.239
<v Speaker 3>But when we extend economia to individual churches, they lose

1140
01:03:35.280 --> 01:03:38.480
<v Speaker 3>their mind and they think that they've got us. Anyway,

1141
01:03:42.039 --> 01:03:48.119
<v Speaker 3>but the Orthodox Church might permit things in certain situations.

1142
01:03:48.199 --> 01:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>There's a great doctor Bradshaw essay on this on natural law,

1143
01:03:53.480 --> 01:03:56.599
<v Speaker 3>and it's a critique of the Thomas position. And for example,

1144
01:03:56.639 --> 01:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the Thomas position argues that you can never feel fear

1145
01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>with the tilos, the biological tilos of the Organs. And

1146
01:04:08.119 --> 01:04:12.159
<v Speaker 3>so if the any frustration of the Organs is a

1147
01:04:12.360 --> 01:04:17.159
<v Speaker 3>worse sin than frustrating the Organs, I'm not kidding. So

1148
01:04:17.320 --> 01:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>this gets so silly that a Roman Catholic would has

1149
01:04:20.960 --> 01:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>to say, if they're trad I kid you not. This

1150
01:04:24.920 --> 01:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>is doctor Bradshaw's a great critique of this that let's

1151
01:04:28.920 --> 01:04:34.559
<v Speaker 3>say you had a blockage in your male area of

1152
01:04:34.920 --> 01:04:37.920
<v Speaker 3>this of semen retention, which it can actually happen, people

1153
01:04:37.960 --> 01:04:40.920
<v Speaker 3>can get a blockage there. The Roman Catholic would say

1154
01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:48.440
<v Speaker 3>that you cannot, through quote unnatural means, to take care

1155
01:04:48.480 --> 01:04:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of that in any way, or the hospital can't take

1156
01:04:51.400 --> 01:04:53.559
<v Speaker 3>care of that in any way, because that would be

1157
01:04:53.760 --> 01:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>a deviation from the natural function, and you have automatically

1158
01:04:58.360 --> 01:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>committed a mortal sin because you're going against biological Aristotelian

1159
01:05:05.800 --> 01:05:10.639
<v Speaker 3>Tilos Tellos for that body organ. This is what led

1160
01:05:10.679 --> 01:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to Quinas. Could you not I'm going from memory. I

1161
01:05:14.960 --> 01:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>haven't looked at this a long time, and I'm pretty

1162
01:05:16.360 --> 01:05:18.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm appy sure this is in the argument in the essay.

1163
01:05:18.719 --> 01:05:30.079
<v Speaker 3>But Aquinas thought that if you spanked it, okay, that's worse.

1164
01:05:31.599 --> 01:05:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Could you not hear me out? That's worse than sleeping

1165
01:05:36.280 --> 01:05:42.239
<v Speaker 3>with your mom or your sister, because spanking it is

1166
01:05:42.599 --> 01:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>more of a deviation from the natural law function of

1167
01:05:47.920 --> 01:05:53.519
<v Speaker 3>the organ than to be with your mom. And you

1168
01:05:53.679 --> 01:05:59.760
<v Speaker 3>wonder why Thomas act like Internet retorts that's what they

1169
01:06:01.960 --> 01:06:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, these are the same hypocrites that says,

1170
01:06:04.159 --> 01:06:08.920
<v Speaker 3>let's say that a quietus, for example, every city should

1171
01:06:08.920 --> 01:06:12.079
<v Speaker 3>have a whorehouse because if you don't, the then adult

1172
01:06:12.119 --> 01:06:14.679
<v Speaker 3>true will run ramd. But I'm not kidding. They actually

1173
01:06:14.719 --> 01:06:20.199
<v Speaker 3>reason that it's less it's better for the common good

1174
01:06:20.679 --> 01:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>for this city to have a whorehouse than to not.

1175
01:06:22.880 --> 01:06:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I kid you not. There's this whole look up and

1176
01:06:25.360 --> 01:06:28.599
<v Speaker 3>the Roman Catholics are a thousand pages coping to make

1177
01:06:28.639 --> 01:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>sense of this because they're devoted to systems right that

1178
01:06:32.119 --> 01:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>they have an in a lack of flexibility when it

1179
01:06:35.480 --> 01:06:39.840
<v Speaker 3>comes to their moral systems. And you've got these idiot,

1180
01:06:39.960 --> 01:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>teenager people on the Internet who think that they're masters

1181
01:06:44.480 --> 01:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>of all this stuff. And they could just go read

1182
01:06:47.519 --> 01:06:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Bradshaw's essay. You got to read this if you want

1183
01:06:50.320 --> 01:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the full thing. I'm gonna tell you it's Ryre. It's

1184
01:06:53.599 --> 01:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Bradshaw Natural Law. I cannot remember the exact name of

1185
01:06:58.920 --> 01:07:00.679
<v Speaker 3>the paper. I was there when he is into the paper.

1186
01:07:00.719 --> 01:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I was like, whoa, this is crazy,

1187
01:07:02.840 --> 01:07:33.239
<v Speaker 3>mind blowing. That's not doctor David Radshaw Man. I hope

1188
01:07:33.280 --> 01:07:35.559
<v Speaker 3>that's not the paper that's I think UBI has an

1189
01:07:35.639 --> 01:07:37.639
<v Speaker 3>interview with him on this topic, though, so we might

1190
01:07:37.719 --> 01:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>could find that. But you gotta see this because this

1191
01:07:45.039 --> 01:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>is pretty devastating to the Thomas and the Riscitilians, if

1192
01:07:48.519 --> 01:07:51.639
<v Speaker 3>you can get them to I think it comes up

1193
01:07:51.679 --> 01:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>in this UBI discussion here, but I'm trying to find

1194
01:07:58.000 --> 01:07:59.519
<v Speaker 3>his exact paper on it.

1195
01:08:01.480 --> 01:08:01.880
<v Speaker 5>This is it.

1196
01:08:02.119 --> 01:08:04.159
<v Speaker 3>It's called what does it mean to be contrary to Nature?

1197
01:08:04.239 --> 01:08:04.559
<v Speaker 5>This is it?

1198
01:08:07.079 --> 01:08:39.079
<v Speaker 3>It may not be available on academia. E du oh,

1199
01:08:39.239 --> 01:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>here we go. Maybe it is available.

1200
01:08:45.479 --> 01:08:46.199
<v Speaker 2>No, that's.

1201
01:08:48.079 --> 01:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not the full paper. I don't think. Here we

1202
01:08:51.680 --> 01:08:59.079
<v Speaker 3>go it is an academia. Look at that, but is

1203
01:08:59.159 --> 01:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>it the full paper? Let's see. Oh, it may not be.

1204
01:09:32.399 --> 01:09:37.800
<v Speaker 3>It is not the full paper. Dang it. That's I

1205
01:09:37.920 --> 01:09:41.680
<v Speaker 3>was afraid of. Yeah, it's only the first few opening

1206
01:09:41.760 --> 01:09:47.520
<v Speaker 3>pages on academica. Do you sang it? But I think

1207
01:09:47.840 --> 01:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>in the interview with UBI and Lewis, I think he

1208
01:09:53.720 --> 01:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>brings up these points. So probably the next best thing

1209
01:09:56.840 --> 01:10:01.159
<v Speaker 3>would be to watch this interview. I don't know if

1210
01:10:01.159 --> 01:10:05.840
<v Speaker 3>he mentions Aquinas's contradictions, but so you get the like

1211
01:10:05.920 --> 01:10:12.399
<v Speaker 3>these Roman Catholics are like so sanctimonious about their moral positions,

1212
01:10:12.479 --> 01:10:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and they don't even realize like the stupid shit that

1213
01:10:15.880 --> 01:10:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Aquinas says about this stuff. It's just like you guys

1214
01:10:19.760 --> 01:10:27.479
<v Speaker 3>are out to lunch. Dude. I'm trying to put this

1215
01:10:27.600 --> 01:10:41.359
<v Speaker 3>in the chat for you guys. Internet sucks tonight. A

1216
01:10:41.439 --> 01:10:46.840
<v Speaker 3>same dog recipe is two dollars. Good stream. I learned

1217
01:10:46.920 --> 01:10:50.239
<v Speaker 3>something and had to laugh. Thanks man. Noadic requests two dollars.

1218
01:10:50.359 --> 01:10:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Check out catechetical lecture nine, paragraph sixteen. Ooh, we got

1219
01:10:56.039 --> 01:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Ortho bros. To the rescue dog. It's been some years

1220
01:11:02.560 --> 01:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>since I watched this interview, but check it out if

1221
01:11:04.800 --> 01:11:08.279
<v Speaker 3>you're interested in what I was talking about earlier. I

1222
01:11:08.399 --> 01:11:10.319
<v Speaker 3>got to x out some of these windows. There's too

1223
01:11:10.359 --> 01:11:13.800
<v Speaker 3>many windows open, the computers all freezing up, burning up.

1224
01:11:13.840 --> 01:11:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Hot Okay, Uh, good grief, dude, h BROSI five dollars.

1225
01:11:50.039 --> 01:11:52.279
<v Speaker 3>I guess Michael Knowles was staying true to his cult

1226
01:11:52.479 --> 01:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>leader by being the lead defender of Nala.

1227
01:11:58.239 --> 01:11:58.399
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

1228
01:12:00.439 --> 01:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Also, I don't think Knowles is going to do the debate, so,

1229
01:12:03.239 --> 01:12:08.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, shocker. I didn't expect them to. But there's

1230
01:12:08.359 --> 01:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>that interview right there. I've got more super chets over here.

1231
01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I gotta read too, h Belooney Bong five dollars. Do

1232
01:12:26.920 --> 01:12:30.279
<v Speaker 3>you believe there's a hierarchy to sin? Well, I definitely

1233
01:12:30.319 --> 01:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>think there's sins that are worse than others. You know,

1234
01:12:32.680 --> 01:12:35.560
<v Speaker 3>if you read the Ezekiel. You know, if you read Ezekiel,

1235
01:12:35.640 --> 01:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>he says, and come, son of Man, I will show

1236
01:12:38.560 --> 01:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you even greater abominations. And he says, I will show

1237
01:12:40.640 --> 01:12:43.960
<v Speaker 3>you even greater abominations. So there's greater and greater abominations

1238
01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>than evils.

1239
01:12:44.680 --> 01:12:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1240
01:12:46.359 --> 01:12:48.680
<v Speaker 3>You know Jesus talks about in that way as well.

1241
01:12:49.399 --> 01:12:53.039
<v Speaker 3>But I don't believe it's like this, like scientifically rigid

1242
01:12:53.119 --> 01:13:04.279
<v Speaker 3>list like Roman Catholics will spit out. I'm trying to

1243
01:13:04.279 --> 01:13:06.079
<v Speaker 3>make sure I didn't miss all these people get really

1244
01:13:06.119 --> 01:13:08.279
<v Speaker 3>mad if I missed their super jet. So I'm trying

1245
01:13:08.319 --> 01:13:11.439
<v Speaker 3>to make sure I hit all these Mark Kumowski five dollars.

1246
01:13:11.520 --> 01:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. I can't worry for hit him or not.

1247
01:13:15.640 --> 01:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>DC woodwork. He became a member my family and I

1248
01:13:17.680 --> 01:13:21.399
<v Speaker 3>received in the church tomorrow. Hey, what's up, dog? Glad

1249
01:13:21.439 --> 01:13:26.079
<v Speaker 3>to hear that man. He says, thank you for the

1250
01:13:26.119 --> 01:13:27.800
<v Speaker 3>work that you do. Glory to God, Thank you man,

1251
01:13:27.880 --> 01:13:34.399
<v Speaker 3>appreciate your support. What was I doing? I already forgot

1252
01:13:34.439 --> 01:13:40.319
<v Speaker 3>what I was looking at. Oh, Catechetical Lecture nine sixteen.

1253
01:13:40.439 --> 01:14:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Let's check that out. Well, he had some feisty i's

1254
01:14:00.239 --> 01:14:01.159
<v Speaker 3>the individuals tonight.

1255
01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:03.319
<v Speaker 6>There you go.

1256
01:14:03.920 --> 01:14:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Nine sixteen is what it was. Aha, I knew it. See,

1257
01:14:15.079 --> 01:14:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I told you he would quote the Dudo economical text

1258
01:14:18.640 --> 01:14:24.479
<v Speaker 3>Catechetical Lecture nine sixteen. He says, he cites Wisdom. See you, guys,

1259
01:14:24.600 --> 01:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I told you. This is Thank God I've got this

1260
01:14:28.840 --> 01:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>is me remembering reading this twenty years ago. Okay, I

1261
01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:35.760
<v Speaker 3>read this twenty years ago. I told you he cites

1262
01:14:35.760 --> 01:14:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the duder chrononical texts within the catechetical lectures. Now again,

1263
01:14:43.399 --> 01:14:48.479
<v Speaker 3>if you call it secondary canon, as we do even

1264
01:14:48.520 --> 01:14:52.079
<v Speaker 3>an Orthodox, that doesn't mean it's not inspired or not

1265
01:14:52.439 --> 01:14:57.399
<v Speaker 3>part of the canon. It's still just secondary canon, and

1266
01:14:57.479 --> 01:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>we don't have a problem with that. But none of

1267
01:14:59.600 --> 01:15:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that Protestantism's canon, nor the principle by which any Protestant

1268
01:15:04.960 --> 01:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>would epistemically justify their canon, you see, And in fact,

1269
01:15:10.520 --> 01:15:13.560
<v Speaker 3>this just shows shows he's citing it to prove his doctrines.

1270
01:15:22.319 --> 01:15:26.079
<v Speaker 3>He cites Wisdom thirteen to five right there. Thank you.

1271
01:15:26.199 --> 01:15:28.680
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I knew that it was there. So

1272
01:15:28.800 --> 01:15:35.359
<v Speaker 3>thank you for finding that noetic quest much appreciated. Bologneybond

1273
01:15:35.439 --> 01:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>five dollars one more just to say I found you

1274
01:15:38.039 --> 01:15:41.199
<v Speaker 3>through an old Sam Hid interview right as I was

1275
01:15:41.800 --> 01:15:48.239
<v Speaker 3>acquiring about Orthodoxy. Well we've only done one, Like what

1276
01:15:48.399 --> 01:15:50.439
<v Speaker 3>a year ago? Is that what you're calling old? Or

1277
01:15:50.560 --> 01:15:53.039
<v Speaker 3>you mean like he oh, you mean the old and

1278
01:15:53.079 --> 01:15:55.359
<v Speaker 3>when I interviewed him like three year or four years ago? Okay,

1279
01:15:55.520 --> 01:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that's probably what you mean. Yeah, I appreciate that. Uh,

1280
01:16:02.119 --> 01:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why the internet's being so crappy or not? Ben,

1281
01:16:07.600 --> 01:16:08.199
<v Speaker 3>what's up on you?

1282
01:16:13.239 --> 01:16:13.399
<v Speaker 11>Yo?

1283
01:16:13.560 --> 01:16:13.880
<v Speaker 6>What up?

1284
01:16:14.760 --> 01:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>How are you doing? I'm good?

1285
01:16:15.920 --> 01:16:16.159
<v Speaker 5>Are you.

1286
01:16:18.079 --> 01:16:19.399
<v Speaker 7>So I can ask a quick question.

1287
01:16:19.520 --> 01:16:20.560
<v Speaker 8>I'm from the UK.

1288
01:16:21.159 --> 01:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I've asked this before. I'm not sure if

1289
01:16:23.039 --> 01:16:25.039
<v Speaker 2>it was to you or someone similar.

1290
01:16:25.159 --> 01:16:29.159
<v Speaker 5>But I'm not really religious, and I'm a boxer and

1291
01:16:29.279 --> 01:16:32.920
<v Speaker 5>I grew up in a kind of masculine working class

1292
01:16:32.960 --> 01:16:36.760
<v Speaker 5>culture and I want to I really like to get

1293
01:16:36.800 --> 01:16:40.119
<v Speaker 5>into religion someday, but the religions around me are just

1294
01:16:40.199 --> 01:16:43.319
<v Speaker 5>so fucking gay. It's it's all about love and peace

1295
01:16:43.520 --> 01:16:45.479
<v Speaker 5>and submission.

1296
01:16:45.640 --> 01:16:49.159
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if somebody slash you return the other

1297
01:16:49.279 --> 01:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>cheek and.

1298
01:16:49.760 --> 01:16:53.319
<v Speaker 5>Them shall inherit the earth, So would you recommend or adoptsy?

1299
01:16:53.439 --> 01:16:56.319
<v Speaker 2>And if so, is it is it the least gay?

1300
01:16:56.399 --> 01:16:58.880
<v Speaker 5>As I've heard and as I understand it, at least.

1301
01:16:58.960 --> 01:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It is it is the least gay, it's the most masculine.

1302
01:17:02.600 --> 01:17:07.239
<v Speaker 3>But I can't guarantee that you won't encounter uh, you know,

1303
01:17:07.520 --> 01:17:14.479
<v Speaker 3>skittles weirdos there as well. So that's everywhere. But I've

1304
01:17:14.720 --> 01:17:20.640
<v Speaker 3>found the best hetero cool dudes in the word ox

1305
01:17:20.720 --> 01:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Church by far. And I was in the Roman Catholic world,

1306
01:17:23.640 --> 01:17:27.079
<v Speaker 3>I was in the Evangelical world. Those are the worst.

1307
01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:32.159
<v Speaker 3>But definitely Orthodoxy is the best. But that doesn't mean

1308
01:17:32.159 --> 01:17:34.640
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to encounter you know, issues there as well.

1309
01:17:34.800 --> 01:17:39.920
<v Speaker 3>So last one anti heresy. I'm kind of winding down,

1310
01:17:40.079 --> 01:17:42.039
<v Speaker 3>so and I don't want to lose my patients. I

1311
01:17:42.079 --> 01:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>feel like if I get I was really biting my

1312
01:17:48.680 --> 01:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>tongue with that Catholic dude and the Protestant dude like

1313
01:17:50.880 --> 01:17:52.399
<v Speaker 3>I was, I would start to I was about to

1314
01:17:52.560 --> 01:17:54.960
<v Speaker 3>like I was about to go a little too far.

1315
01:17:55.159 --> 01:17:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So it's better to end the discussions before I start

1316
01:17:59.680 --> 01:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>like losing it and making fun of them, and you know,

1317
01:18:03.920 --> 01:18:05.319
<v Speaker 3>it's just going to go too far. Go ahead, man,

1318
01:18:05.319 --> 01:18:11.479
<v Speaker 3>what's up on you? It was going on? Man, Yes, sir,

1319
01:18:13.359 --> 01:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>all right, I'm going to argue with you, brother, Oh

1320
01:18:18.039 --> 01:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>what's on your mind?

1321
01:18:20.039 --> 01:18:24.159
<v Speaker 16>I want to know what's your biggest issues with Catholicism

1322
01:18:24.279 --> 01:18:29.520
<v Speaker 16>excluding all the theology. The theology and doctrinal whatever errors

1323
01:18:29.560 --> 01:18:32.840
<v Speaker 16>that you claim they are. But well, it's your biggest

1324
01:18:32.880 --> 01:18:34.920
<v Speaker 16>concerns with the Catholicism.

1325
01:18:34.960 --> 01:18:37.079
<v Speaker 3>I would say outside of that's actually I appreciate that

1326
01:18:37.199 --> 01:18:39.399
<v Speaker 3>question because most of the time people ask the you know,

1327
01:18:39.560 --> 01:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>theology questions, so I'm happy to address.

1328
01:18:42.680 --> 01:18:42.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1329
01:18:42.880 --> 01:18:45.600
<v Speaker 16>You got to remember, like majority of people don't understand

1330
01:18:45.760 --> 01:18:48.520
<v Speaker 16>or even they don't even have the ability to comprehend.

1331
01:18:48.119 --> 01:18:49.920
<v Speaker 8>Most of that stuff, so it's kind of like.

1332
01:18:49.960 --> 01:18:53.479
<v Speaker 3>For a particular group, that's true. I would say the

1333
01:18:53.560 --> 01:18:56.439
<v Speaker 3>main problems outside of the theology would be that I

1334
01:18:56.560 --> 01:19:03.079
<v Speaker 3>think the Vatican was pretty deeply corrupted a long time ago,

1335
01:19:03.800 --> 01:19:06.720
<v Speaker 3>but nowadays totally corrupted and pretty much an organ of

1336
01:19:07.039 --> 01:19:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the globalists. So that's my big one.

1337
01:19:11.520 --> 01:19:15.600
<v Speaker 16>Okay, So pretty much you're you're saying that the Roman

1338
01:19:15.640 --> 01:19:20.720
<v Speaker 16>Catholic Church is engaging in the whole NW New World

1339
01:19:20.880 --> 01:19:21.760
<v Speaker 16>Order agenda.

1340
01:19:21.960 --> 01:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they're a part of it.

1341
01:19:23.439 --> 01:19:24.479
<v Speaker 8>Like one of the players in it.

1342
01:19:24.920 --> 01:19:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Vatican, not the average Roman Catholic, but the

1343
01:19:28.800 --> 01:19:31.279
<v Speaker 3>institution of the Vatican at the top I think is

1344
01:19:31.359 --> 01:19:32.399
<v Speaker 3>completely co opted.

1345
01:19:32.479 --> 01:19:36.760
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, okay, and I'm assuming your evidence for that would be, like,

1346
01:19:37.399 --> 01:19:39.199
<v Speaker 16>would it be like just the CIA involvement.

1347
01:19:40.239 --> 01:19:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that's one window into it, But no, that's

1348
01:19:42.560 --> 01:19:44.439
<v Speaker 3>not my only evidence. I think you can go to

1349
01:19:44.880 --> 01:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Roman Catholic writers who critique this point of corruption within

1350
01:19:49.279 --> 01:19:53.079
<v Speaker 3>the Church. It's not just the CIA, it's British intelligence,

1351
01:19:53.239 --> 01:19:58.279
<v Speaker 3>it's Israeli intelligence having relationships with the Vatican. It's a

1352
01:19:58.560 --> 01:20:00.680
<v Speaker 3>sexual compromise in regard to a lot of the p

1353
01:20:01.159 --> 01:20:07.199
<v Speaker 3>PDF stuff, Vatican Bank operation Gladio. I think all of

1354
01:20:07.279 --> 01:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>those are windows into a lot of the corruption.

1355
01:20:12.479 --> 01:20:14.760
<v Speaker 16>And yeah, I'm assuming I thought the only reason you

1356
01:20:14.800 --> 01:20:16.119
<v Speaker 16>would have a problem with that is because of the

1357
01:20:16.159 --> 01:20:17.319
<v Speaker 16>claim of infallibility.

1358
01:20:19.880 --> 01:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not the only reason I was a problem with.

1359
01:20:22.119 --> 01:20:24.680
<v Speaker 3>The problem I would say is that the Roman Catholic

1360
01:20:24.800 --> 01:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Church around the eleventh century started to explicitly say that

1361
01:20:30.199 --> 01:20:35.279
<v Speaker 3>it was a state world power. Prior to that, most

1362
01:20:35.319 --> 01:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>of the churches in the East and the West didn't

1363
01:20:38.039 --> 01:20:42.359
<v Speaker 3>see the Church as a global state power. But the

1364
01:20:42.439 --> 01:20:45.800
<v Speaker 3>papacy for various reasons, not all of which were bad,

1365
01:20:45.880 --> 01:20:49.640
<v Speaker 3>but for many reasons, began to step into the vacuum

1366
01:20:49.840 --> 01:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of a collapsed Western Empire and took on more and

1367
01:20:53.760 --> 01:20:57.199
<v Speaker 3>more worldly power. And so that made the Vatican into

1368
01:20:57.319 --> 01:20:59.680
<v Speaker 3>a very worldly geopolitical power.

1369
01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:03.159
<v Speaker 16>And you probably credit most of that to like in

1370
01:21:03.239 --> 01:21:05.840
<v Speaker 16>the modern area, speaking of you probably credit most of

1371
01:21:05.880 --> 01:21:09.279
<v Speaker 16>that government influence our CIA influence.

1372
01:21:10.199 --> 01:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>In the modern area, yes, But in the Middle Ages,

1373
01:21:13.720 --> 01:21:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I think there were confluences of interest German uh. The

1374
01:21:19.039 --> 01:21:24.199
<v Speaker 3>popes for all the eleventh century were appointed by German kings,

1375
01:21:24.600 --> 01:21:27.159
<v Speaker 3>and so they had their own issue of Cicero papism.

1376
01:21:28.479 --> 01:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that wealthy Franks then and Medici's used the

1377
01:21:32.840 --> 01:21:35.800
<v Speaker 3>papacy for their own designs. So that's going on for

1378
01:21:35.840 --> 01:21:37.960
<v Speaker 3>a long time, and I'm not I'm not denying that.

1379
01:21:38.439 --> 01:21:41.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, there have been corrupt Orthodox bishops and patriarchs too,

1380
01:21:41.880 --> 01:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>but the Orthodox Church doesn't make the claims that Vatican

1381
01:21:45.079 --> 01:21:49.079
<v Speaker 3>one makes, And if the Vatican one's true, then I'm

1382
01:21:49.119 --> 01:21:52.439
<v Speaker 3>going to have to believe like that when the CIA

1383
01:21:52.640 --> 01:21:54.800
<v Speaker 3>was helping to get Paul the sixth elected, it was

1384
01:21:54.880 --> 01:21:57.159
<v Speaker 3>really the Holy Spirit using the CIA to get. I mean,

1385
01:21:57.159 --> 01:21:59.640
<v Speaker 3>it's just crazy to me to go down that route.

1386
01:22:01.319 --> 01:22:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1387
01:22:01.640 --> 01:22:04.520
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean with the CIA helping to get elected,

1388
01:22:04.520 --> 01:22:07.560
<v Speaker 16>were they just like given like who they would prefer

1389
01:22:07.760 --> 01:22:08.399
<v Speaker 16>or were.

1390
01:22:08.239 --> 01:22:08.960
<v Speaker 8>They demand him?

1391
01:22:08.960 --> 01:22:10.960
<v Speaker 16>Because I've seen the documents on it and it said

1392
01:22:10.960 --> 01:22:13.279
<v Speaker 16>that they kind of asked who they would want, but

1393
01:22:13.560 --> 01:22:15.760
<v Speaker 16>in the end it was decided by the cardinals made

1394
01:22:15.800 --> 01:22:16.680
<v Speaker 16>the ultimate decision.

1395
01:22:18.119 --> 01:22:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's hard to say exactly how that went down.

1396
01:22:20.880 --> 01:22:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that if you read the Paul Williams.

1397
01:22:23.399 --> 01:22:25.760
<v Speaker 8>Book, I put like a gun to their head and

1398
01:22:25.880 --> 01:22:27.159
<v Speaker 8>was like this guy pull now.

1399
01:22:27.720 --> 01:22:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Now. According to Paul Williams, uh Gladio and the operators

1400
01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:38.680
<v Speaker 3>in Gladia were able to probably sexually compromise cardinals and

1401
01:22:39.239 --> 01:22:40.720
<v Speaker 3>that was It's true.

1402
01:22:40.880 --> 01:22:42.560
<v Speaker 8>It is true, though you know it's true.

1403
01:22:42.960 --> 01:22:46.199
<v Speaker 16>But my whole thing is I believe the infallibility it

1404
01:22:46.279 --> 01:22:48.079
<v Speaker 16>can't pertain to the individual themselves.

1405
01:22:48.079 --> 01:22:50.399
<v Speaker 8>It has to be to the title, the title.

1406
01:22:50.159 --> 01:22:52.560
<v Speaker 16>Of pope, you know, because there's no no I mean,

1407
01:22:52.880 --> 01:22:53.920
<v Speaker 16>I don't know what's.

1408
01:22:53.680 --> 01:22:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Your perspective, but you can't. You can't divorce the person

1409
01:22:57.159 --> 01:23:00.319
<v Speaker 3>who holds the office from the powers that he's supposed

1410
01:23:00.319 --> 01:23:02.039
<v Speaker 3>to have. And one of those powers is supposed to

1411
01:23:02.079 --> 01:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>be the ability to speak ex cathedral.

1412
01:23:05.920 --> 01:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So.

1413
01:23:07.880 --> 01:23:11.079
<v Speaker 16>Logic like like a police officer does something bad, so

1414
01:23:11.279 --> 01:23:13.920
<v Speaker 16>the whole police force, or like if the poll does

1415
01:23:13.960 --> 01:23:14.479
<v Speaker 16>something bad.

1416
01:23:14.520 --> 01:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, no, no, no, no, that's a false analogy

1417
01:23:17.600 --> 01:23:20.279
<v Speaker 3>because it's not a question of him doing a moral evil.

1418
01:23:20.439 --> 01:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>It's a question of infallible teaching. No, it's it's that

1419
01:23:25.520 --> 01:23:29.279
<v Speaker 3>he can't teach wrong or like contradict Catholic teaching.

1420
01:23:29.439 --> 01:23:33.039
<v Speaker 2>So not a question of yeah, yeah, yeah, and then

1421
01:23:33.239 --> 01:23:33.920
<v Speaker 2>and what's what's what?

1422
01:23:34.039 --> 01:23:34.600
<v Speaker 11>What would you say?

1423
01:23:34.680 --> 01:23:38.319
<v Speaker 16>Stands out the most like the most obvious, like theoretical

1424
01:23:38.399 --> 01:23:39.399
<v Speaker 16>teaching that's.

1425
01:23:39.279 --> 01:23:39.800
<v Speaker 17>Been put out.

1426
01:23:40.800 --> 01:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>I usually give three examples. First example is if you

1427
01:23:45.640 --> 01:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>look at dictatus Pope, and if you look at and

1428
01:23:48.920 --> 01:23:50.920
<v Speaker 3>these are easy to find, and then you look at

1429
01:23:51.279 --> 01:23:54.640
<v Speaker 3>when them sunk them those are not very long. Documents

1430
01:23:54.640 --> 01:23:57.520
<v Speaker 3>are pretty short. One from eleventh century, one from the

1431
01:23:57.520 --> 01:24:00.479
<v Speaker 3>fourteenth century. They both say that you have to believe

1432
01:24:00.760 --> 01:24:04.279
<v Speaker 3>that the pope is also a world power to be saved.

1433
01:24:04.359 --> 01:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>So if you don't believe that he has spiritual and

1434
01:24:06.920 --> 01:24:11.359
<v Speaker 3>temporal power, namely that he's a world ruler, you can't

1435
01:24:11.439 --> 01:24:14.800
<v Speaker 3>be saved. Post Vatican Two, the Romancalliy Church no longer

1436
01:24:14.840 --> 01:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>teaches that. That's one contradiction. Number two. Francis has said

1437
01:24:18.840 --> 01:24:21.239
<v Speaker 3>many times over that the death penalty is.

1438
01:24:23.159 --> 01:24:25.760
<v Speaker 16>The first, the first one you brought up with, having

1439
01:24:25.800 --> 01:24:28.279
<v Speaker 16>to believe that pope is a state power or what.

1440
01:24:28.680 --> 01:24:30.680
<v Speaker 8>Say, yeah, a state power.

1441
01:24:30.920 --> 01:24:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're a world ruler ultimately basically king of kings.

1442
01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:39.479
<v Speaker 8>Okay, and you think that that would be a heretical claim.

1443
01:24:40.079 --> 01:24:42.119
<v Speaker 3>No, no, I'm pointing out contradict. Well, yeah I would,

1444
01:24:42.159 --> 01:24:46.079
<v Speaker 3>but I'm saying like that contradicts the post Vatican two papacy,

1445
01:24:46.359 --> 01:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>which no longer wears the triple crown. If you remember,

1446
01:24:49.359 --> 01:24:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the pope used to wear a triple crown that signified

1447
01:24:51.479 --> 01:24:57.279
<v Speaker 3>that triple authority. They don't wear that anymore because post

1448
01:24:57.359 --> 01:25:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Vatican two, they don't teach the temp moral supremacy the

1449
01:25:00.880 --> 01:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Roman bishop anymore. So that to me is the contradiction.

1450
01:25:03.840 --> 01:25:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Two.

1451
01:25:05.359 --> 01:25:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Francis has said the death penalty is contrary to

1452
01:25:08.600 --> 01:25:14.479
<v Speaker 3>the Gospel. But prior to Vatican two, Uh, the every

1453
01:25:14.520 --> 01:25:17.119
<v Speaker 3>cality church every day they tall the death penalty, So

1454
01:25:18.199 --> 01:25:19.520
<v Speaker 3>that to me is contradiction. Three.

1455
01:25:21.399 --> 01:25:25.239
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, Vatican two is is pretty much like what he

1456
01:25:25.319 --> 01:25:26.920
<v Speaker 16>was talking about the Muslims and whatnot.

1457
01:25:27.359 --> 01:25:29.479
<v Speaker 3>That was my third one, right, So nosro tat in

1458
01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Letmagentium sixteen say that Muslims and Christians worship the same

1459
01:25:32.920 --> 01:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>god uh and that, and then you can you can

1460
01:25:35.399 --> 01:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>also see places where they talk like Jews still have

1461
01:25:38.760 --> 01:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the same covenant and force.

1462
01:25:41.640 --> 01:25:42.199
<v Speaker 8>It's something that.

1463
01:25:42.199 --> 01:25:43.399
<v Speaker 11>I've been actually thinking about.

1464
01:25:44.920 --> 01:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's more, but those are my three.

1465
01:25:48.720 --> 01:25:51.279
<v Speaker 16>I'm sure you yourself can attest to this, like the

1466
01:25:51.359 --> 01:25:54.840
<v Speaker 16>frustration that comes with debating, like they say muslim is

1467
01:25:54.880 --> 01:25:57.800
<v Speaker 16>Protestants or just like any like the frustration that she

1468
01:25:57.880 --> 01:25:59.199
<v Speaker 16>had caught her with, like how people.

1469
01:25:58.960 --> 01:26:00.199
<v Speaker 8>Are unable to underst.

1470
01:26:00.119 --> 01:26:03.640
<v Speaker 16>That and comprehend and this is like literally just scratching it.

1471
01:26:03.800 --> 01:26:05.159
<v Speaker 8>Like probably what is wrong with these people?

1472
01:26:05.279 --> 01:26:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Like why why is the world this weeking?

1473
01:26:06.960 --> 01:26:07.119
<v Speaker 11>Why?

1474
01:26:07.359 --> 01:26:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot of people don't want to Yeah, I mean, yeah,

1475
01:26:09.439 --> 01:26:11.640
<v Speaker 3>you're right, and I appreciate your call. A lot of

1476
01:26:11.680 --> 01:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>people don't want to look at the documents. They don't care.

1477
01:26:13.960 --> 01:26:17.000
<v Speaker 3>People don't even read books anymore. So if you read books,

1478
01:26:17.039 --> 01:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>you're kind of like, you know, already a weirdo brando. Yeah,

1479
01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.560
<v Speaker 3>what's on your mind?

1480
01:26:37.439 --> 01:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

1481
01:26:37.880 --> 01:26:38.600
<v Speaker 8>Question for you.

1482
01:26:38.760 --> 01:26:42.600
<v Speaker 17>I've been dipping into your like live streams and following

1483
01:26:42.680 --> 01:26:49.079
<v Speaker 17>your your tweets about Christianity, Bible stuff. I got turned

1484
01:26:49.119 --> 01:26:51.720
<v Speaker 17>on to you through Info Wars doing your Fourth Hour

1485
01:26:51.800 --> 01:26:56.680
<v Speaker 17>on Fridays. Love all your your subjects matter and deep dives.

1486
01:26:58.279 --> 01:27:01.479
<v Speaker 17>I was a Christian, well, I am a Christian.

1487
01:27:01.239 --> 01:27:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, but I was raised in a Baptist church.

1488
01:27:07.920 --> 01:27:13.520
<v Speaker 17>I backslid and started buying the whole alien nonsense with

1489
01:27:14.560 --> 01:27:17.600
<v Speaker 17>you know, some other being out there other than God

1490
01:27:18.640 --> 01:27:22.840
<v Speaker 17>had a child. My view on that has changed a lot.

1491
01:27:23.039 --> 01:27:25.479
<v Speaker 17>I've seen a lot. I'm forty five, I've seen a

1492
01:27:25.520 --> 01:27:28.560
<v Speaker 17>lot happen. I see the nature of good and evil

1493
01:27:28.640 --> 01:27:31.520
<v Speaker 17>in the world, and there's no doubt in my mind

1494
01:27:31.640 --> 01:27:32.439
<v Speaker 17>that there is.

1495
01:27:33.840 --> 01:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Evil and good.

1496
01:27:35.119 --> 01:27:40.560
<v Speaker 17>But I've been watching like the that that show The

1497
01:27:40.720 --> 01:27:45.239
<v Speaker 17>Chosen with my family, and it really like tugged on me,

1498
01:27:45.560 --> 01:27:48.880
<v Speaker 17>like like I need to like really get involved and

1499
01:27:49.399 --> 01:27:53.279
<v Speaker 17>and read more and research more, and I want to

1500
01:27:53.359 --> 01:27:54.079
<v Speaker 17>read the Bible.

1501
01:27:54.239 --> 01:27:57.239
<v Speaker 8>I just want to know it based on your recommendations.

1502
01:27:57.279 --> 01:27:59.000
<v Speaker 8>I've heard you say it because like I said, I

1503
01:27:59.119 --> 01:28:01.159
<v Speaker 8>dip in what Bible should I.

1504
01:28:01.319 --> 01:28:04.760
<v Speaker 17>Like buy to like study, Like there's different ones.

1505
01:28:04.960 --> 01:28:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Get an Orthodox, get the Orthodox study Bible, the one

1506
01:28:07.800 --> 01:28:10.960
<v Speaker 3>that I'm showing right here, so I think it's still

1507
01:28:10.960 --> 01:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>available on I think you can still get it online.

1508
01:28:15.039 --> 01:28:21.119
<v Speaker 3>But thanks for your call, Austin, and don't go to

1509
01:28:21.199 --> 01:28:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Protestant church, go to Orthodoxers. Mason McGahee one dollar, Thank

1510
01:28:25.680 --> 01:28:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Santos Jimenez twenty bucks. I know the

1511
01:28:28.640 --> 01:28:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Bible wasn't put together by God, but I'm struggling to

1512
01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:36.000
<v Speaker 3>understand how to interpret anything outside the Bible. Obviously, Peter

1513
01:28:36.039 --> 01:28:40.039
<v Speaker 3>and Paul taught people that went on to write letters.

1514
01:28:40.279 --> 01:28:43.039
<v Speaker 3>Do we take those as an authority? Do you mean

1515
01:28:43.159 --> 01:28:46.760
<v Speaker 3>like the post Apostolic fathers like Ignacious and Clement, they

1516
01:28:46.840 --> 01:28:51.960
<v Speaker 3>are authorities, but they're not equal to the Bible, right,

1517
01:28:52.159 --> 01:28:54.840
<v Speaker 3>So you know, if you read Ambrose or Ignacious or

1518
01:28:54.880 --> 01:28:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Clement of Alexander, I mean Clement to Roma should say

1519
01:28:58.560 --> 01:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>they are going to be helpful, and they show the

1520
01:29:03.960 --> 01:29:08.119
<v Speaker 3>unanimity and the continuance of the Orthodox faith in those centuries,

1521
01:29:08.760 --> 01:29:11.800
<v Speaker 3>but they're not identical to the authority of you know,

1522
01:29:11.880 --> 01:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Peter and Paul. I believe the Apostles have a clear

1523
01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:19.319
<v Speaker 3>authority that is not continued on in the sense of

1524
01:29:19.399 --> 01:29:22.279
<v Speaker 3>like new divine revelations. So once John dies, there's no

1525
01:29:22.399 --> 01:29:25.640
<v Speaker 3>more public divine revelations. There can be gifts and miracles

1526
01:29:25.760 --> 01:29:29.279
<v Speaker 3>and clairvoyants, but that's not the same thing as public

1527
01:29:29.359 --> 01:29:32.800
<v Speaker 3>divine revelation. There's never going to be like, oh, you know,

1528
01:29:33.239 --> 01:29:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Saint so and so has a new Bible chapter that's

1529
01:29:37.800 --> 01:29:39.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be added to the Book of Revelation. Like

1530
01:29:39.920 --> 01:29:45.880
<v Speaker 3>that's not going to happen. Everything that councils are commenting

1531
01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:51.359
<v Speaker 3>on is commenting on the faith once for all delivered

1532
01:29:51.359 --> 01:29:53.199
<v Speaker 3>to the saints. If it's once for all delivered as

1533
01:29:53.239 --> 01:29:58.239
<v Speaker 3>you three says, it's not evolving. There's not new charismatic

1534
01:29:58.319 --> 01:30:01.319
<v Speaker 3>cults coming up with new revelations. That's cut out immediately.

1535
01:30:01.520 --> 01:30:06.920
<v Speaker 3>No Mormon, no Joseph Smith, no Muhammad. It's all immediately

1536
01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:13.079
<v Speaker 3>cut away. Hcim lvl Fishing became a member. What's up?

1537
01:30:14.720 --> 01:30:18.359
<v Speaker 3>And why would we not want the obviously easy position

1538
01:30:18.640 --> 01:30:22.359
<v Speaker 3>of that cuts away all these goofball cults. Like if

1539
01:30:23.199 --> 01:30:26.800
<v Speaker 3>divine revelation is complete and finished and sealed up when

1540
01:30:26.920 --> 01:30:29.560
<v Speaker 3>John dies, there's no new divine revelations that are public

1541
01:30:30.199 --> 01:30:36.520
<v Speaker 3>theological revelations. Don't you understand? That makes it very simple

1542
01:30:36.680 --> 01:30:40.199
<v Speaker 3>that any cult leader coming along claiming to be a

1543
01:30:40.319 --> 01:30:45.039
<v Speaker 3>new prophet and have new revelations is automatically out of here. Dude,

1544
01:30:45.439 --> 01:30:50.279
<v Speaker 3>we already know you're a fraud that cuts out like everything,

1545
01:30:50.600 --> 01:30:54.960
<v Speaker 3>even Protestant crops like you don't teach according to you know,

1546
01:30:55.520 --> 01:30:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the tradition handed down his pulses. What's up, Austin?

1547
01:31:00.079 --> 01:31:00.399
<v Speaker 2>What's this?

1548
01:31:00.600 --> 01:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Man?

1549
01:31:01.039 --> 01:31:04.640
<v Speaker 6>I have a question about the trans and gental argument.

1550
01:31:04.399 --> 01:31:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Thing that you.

1551
01:31:06.600 --> 01:31:07.119
<v Speaker 17>Go by it.

1552
01:31:07.439 --> 01:31:11.960
<v Speaker 8>And I was like curious about the Kant like is

1553
01:31:12.720 --> 01:31:14.000
<v Speaker 8>was a Lutheran.

1554
01:31:14.720 --> 01:31:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Or Carl was a Kau was raised by a German

1555
01:31:20.359 --> 01:31:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Pietist family, so they were and they might have been

1556
01:31:22.600 --> 01:31:25.079
<v Speaker 3>influenced by Lutheranism, but it was Pietism.

1557
01:31:27.119 --> 01:31:29.680
<v Speaker 8>And isn't it Protestant technically or that's not.

1558
01:31:30.079 --> 01:31:34.359
<v Speaker 3>No, probably absolutely Protestantism is Pietism is absolutely Protestanism.

1559
01:31:34.399 --> 01:31:39.520
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely so when you bring that up, because I've watched

1560
01:31:39.680 --> 01:31:40.960
<v Speaker 6>your great debate or you're.

1561
01:31:40.960 --> 01:31:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Very good at what you do, okay, So can I

1562
01:31:42.560 --> 01:31:44.600
<v Speaker 3>just immediately I know where you're going with this. So,

1563
01:31:44.880 --> 01:31:48.640
<v Speaker 3>first of all, the transmonal argument for God is not

1564
01:31:48.760 --> 01:31:49.239
<v Speaker 3>from Kant.

1565
01:31:52.760 --> 01:31:54.640
<v Speaker 9>From uh.

1566
01:31:55.520 --> 01:31:58.319
<v Speaker 3>You could argue it's in a way it's done by

1567
01:31:58.359 --> 01:32:02.199
<v Speaker 3>John Damascus in his fam out of knowledge, but I don't.

1568
01:32:02.199 --> 01:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not aware of anybody specifically doing the transfit argument

1569
01:32:04.720 --> 01:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>for God until modern Protestants. But do you know what

1570
01:32:07.640 --> 01:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>a genetic fallacy is?

1571
01:32:11.600 --> 01:32:12.159
<v Speaker 6>Uh? No?

1572
01:32:13.159 --> 01:32:15.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's when you say that something is right or

1573
01:32:15.039 --> 01:32:19.039
<v Speaker 3>wrong based on the source. Okay, so the fact if

1574
01:32:19.079 --> 01:32:22.279
<v Speaker 3>a Protestant made an argument, that would have nothing to

1575
01:32:22.359 --> 01:32:24.399
<v Speaker 3>do with whether they argument is true or false. So

1576
01:32:24.520 --> 01:32:27.439
<v Speaker 3>the source of the thing doesn't prove or disprove, just

1577
01:32:27.560 --> 01:32:30.479
<v Speaker 3>like when Roman Catholics, like when they when they say,

1578
01:32:31.720 --> 01:32:35.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, Aristotle's first cause argument. Oh so does that

1579
01:32:35.920 --> 01:32:40.520
<v Speaker 3>mean it's fake because it's a ariostols a pagan So

1580
01:32:40.640 --> 01:32:42.439
<v Speaker 3>you see, it's a it's a It's called the genetic

1581
01:32:42.520 --> 01:32:45.279
<v Speaker 3>fallacy because the source really has nothing to do with

1582
01:32:45.319 --> 01:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>whether it's true or false in most cases.

1583
01:32:48.039 --> 01:32:49.640
<v Speaker 8>With them, that make Pluto.

1584
01:32:50.760 --> 01:32:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Technically a genetic fallacy. Then with the Bible, because he

1585
01:32:55.640 --> 01:33:00.479
<v Speaker 6>dead is like a religious like ye had make a

1586
01:33:00.560 --> 01:33:04.840
<v Speaker 6>religion his whole plutonium and whatever stuff on to like

1587
01:33:05.399 --> 01:33:08.199
<v Speaker 6>correlate with what con did you talking about?

1588
01:33:08.199 --> 01:33:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Plato? Plato or who's Pluto or Plato?

1589
01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:15.479
<v Speaker 6>Sorry I'm in Plato.

1590
01:33:16.119 --> 01:33:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm like I'm thinking of like I'm thinking of

1591
01:33:19.560 --> 01:33:24.439
<v Speaker 3>like Disney. I think I'm thinking of Disney. I think that.

1592
01:33:24.560 --> 01:33:27.399
<v Speaker 3>I think nowadays a lot of people were I believe

1593
01:33:27.439 --> 01:33:30.159
<v Speaker 3>in the plu the Pluto forms, like the form of

1594
01:33:30.239 --> 01:33:37.119
<v Speaker 3>Pluto like, I'm sorry, it's just funny, dude. Now wait

1595
01:33:37.159 --> 01:33:39.239
<v Speaker 3>a minute, so what so what does that do with Plato?

1596
01:33:39.359 --> 01:33:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm lost? What about it?

1597
01:33:41.159 --> 01:33:43.319
<v Speaker 6>No, because Plato didn't he have like a thing where

1598
01:33:43.319 --> 01:33:45.520
<v Speaker 6>he was talking about how to create a religion, you

1599
01:33:45.600 --> 01:33:47.640
<v Speaker 6>know before you know, he.

1600
01:33:48.079 --> 01:33:49.319
<v Speaker 8>Had his own like take on.

1601
01:33:51.319 --> 01:33:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Kind of I mean, he believed he was by the

1602
01:33:54.039 --> 01:33:57.920
<v Speaker 3>way I'm still learning, I mean, he believed in noble

1603
01:33:58.800 --> 01:34:01.760
<v Speaker 3>he believed in the noble lit so he thought that

1604
01:34:02.640 --> 01:34:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the perfect republic could have a fake religion that was

1605
01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:08.640
<v Speaker 3>a kind of a cult. Yeah, so that there's an

1606
01:34:08.640 --> 01:34:09.880
<v Speaker 3>element of that in Plato. Shure.

1607
01:34:11.239 --> 01:34:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well yeah, as well as I was asking.

1608
01:34:13.840 --> 01:34:17.119
<v Speaker 3>About your Yeah. So so to be clear, right, so

1609
01:34:17.479 --> 01:34:22.039
<v Speaker 3>Kant makes transcendental arguments. He's not the first to do it.

1610
01:34:22.640 --> 01:34:25.079
<v Speaker 3>You could argue that Aristotle is the first to do it.

1611
01:34:25.239 --> 01:34:30.000
<v Speaker 3>In metaphysics, John Damascus following Aristotle does a very similar

1612
01:34:30.039 --> 01:34:33.159
<v Speaker 3>move at the very beginning of Fount of Knowledge. But

1613
01:34:33.600 --> 01:34:36.760
<v Speaker 3>it's actually not until you know, the last century that

1614
01:34:36.920 --> 01:34:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Protestants started making c s. Lewis makes a type of

1615
01:34:41.079 --> 01:34:46.079
<v Speaker 3>transcendent argument too one time, very close to it. But

1616
01:34:46.880 --> 01:34:51.720
<v Speaker 3>the transcen areum for God is pretty modern, and it

1617
01:34:51.880 --> 01:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>is Protestants who do it. But the argument stands on

1618
01:34:55.760 --> 01:34:57.640
<v Speaker 3>its own like it's it's either true or false on

1619
01:34:57.720 --> 01:34:59.800
<v Speaker 3>its own merits. It doesn't matter whether a Protestant came

1620
01:34:59.880 --> 01:35:04.039
<v Speaker 3>up anymore than Aristotle's arguments for first cause are tru

1621
01:35:04.159 --> 01:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>or false. Because Ariostota was a pagan, he has nothing

1622
01:35:06.640 --> 01:35:08.399
<v Speaker 3>to do with whether it's good or whether it stands

1623
01:35:08.479 --> 01:35:12.640
<v Speaker 3>or false. So but good question. I'm not trying to

1624
01:35:13.279 --> 01:35:14.680
<v Speaker 3>make fun of you or he means you, but it

1625
01:35:14.800 --> 01:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>was just it was funny. I'm thinking of like pute

1626
01:35:17.039 --> 01:35:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Plutinism now, like like Pluto, like the Disney Indian Disney

1627
01:35:25.600 --> 01:35:28.720
<v Speaker 3>like actually now like I remember when I was a

1628
01:35:28.760 --> 01:35:34.039
<v Speaker 3>philosophy student, like Plato, he's cool, he's esoteric. Plato is

1629
01:35:34.119 --> 01:35:35.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of an idiot dude, like I would. I would

1630
01:35:36.039 --> 01:35:39.039
<v Speaker 3>more so kind of nowadays be like more into Plutinism,

1631
01:35:39.199 --> 01:35:44.359
<v Speaker 3>like Plutoism, Like I forgot that Pluto was Goofy's dog,

1632
01:35:44.760 --> 01:35:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the way a dog has a dog. That's actually kind

1633
01:35:46.640 --> 01:35:52.279
<v Speaker 3>of funny. So Pluto is Goofy's dog, and Goofy is

1634
01:35:52.319 --> 01:35:53.960
<v Speaker 3>a dog with a dog. That's actually pretty funny. I

1635
01:35:54.039 --> 01:36:00.720
<v Speaker 3>never even thought about that. It's meta, dude, Disney's going

1636
01:36:00.840 --> 01:36:07.399
<v Speaker 3>like full meta. I'm all, I'm all about some Plutonism now, Alias,

1637
01:36:16.520 --> 01:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>what's up? Alias? We got Jennifer Garner in the house.

1638
01:36:22.840 --> 01:36:26.000
<v Speaker 8>So I'm not really I don't know a lot about

1639
01:36:26.039 --> 01:36:26.680
<v Speaker 8>this subject.

1640
01:36:26.840 --> 01:36:29.119
<v Speaker 11>But what do you mean by falls?

1641
01:36:32.039 --> 01:36:33.680
<v Speaker 3>False just means not true.

1642
01:36:35.119 --> 01:36:37.359
<v Speaker 8>So Protestantism is false?

1643
01:36:37.760 --> 01:36:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Why?

1644
01:36:39.439 --> 01:36:43.399
<v Speaker 3>Uh, it's not true because it's a copy of a

1645
01:36:43.439 --> 01:36:45.000
<v Speaker 3>copy of a copy of a split of a split

1646
01:36:45.079 --> 01:36:45.479
<v Speaker 3>of a split.

1647
01:36:46.880 --> 01:36:48.199
<v Speaker 14>Okay, so what is it?

1648
01:36:48.439 --> 01:36:48.479
<v Speaker 6>What?

1649
01:36:48.800 --> 01:36:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Like, what's missing?

1650
01:36:50.560 --> 01:36:51.840
<v Speaker 3>You've never heard of the word false?

1651
01:36:54.199 --> 01:36:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, well yeah, but like what is missing in Protestantism?

1652
01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:06.039
<v Speaker 3>A lot of things are missing. Sacraments, tradition, authority, lived

1653
01:37:06.119 --> 01:37:08.960
<v Speaker 3>experience of lives of the saints. I mean a lot

1654
01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:09.680
<v Speaker 3>of things are missing.

1655
01:37:14.199 --> 01:37:17.520
<v Speaker 18>I think like a lot of Catholic people seem to

1656
01:37:17.600 --> 01:37:21.279
<v Speaker 18>be an Orthodox people too, seem to be very very strict.

1657
01:37:21.960 --> 01:37:25.159
<v Speaker 18>For me, for example, you know, Christianity is very simple,

1658
01:37:25.279 --> 01:37:26.760
<v Speaker 18>It's kind of like an organic thing.

1659
01:37:27.960 --> 01:37:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, like does it really have to be really strict?

1660
01:37:30.880 --> 01:37:34.720
<v Speaker 18>And like oh, you know, because there are like many

1661
01:37:34.760 --> 01:37:38.119
<v Speaker 18>ways to believe in you know, God and you know,

1662
01:37:38.680 --> 01:37:39.319
<v Speaker 18>different things.

1663
01:37:42.079 --> 01:37:45.359
<v Speaker 3>I think we have to follow what Jesus told us.

1664
01:37:45.520 --> 01:37:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And Jesus didn't say that there's many ways to believe

1665
01:37:48.760 --> 01:37:52.439
<v Speaker 3>and do the religion, so no, he said there's one way.

1666
01:37:53.279 --> 01:37:58.199
<v Speaker 3>So I think what you're saying is just not even Christianity. Javon,

1667
01:37:58.359 --> 01:38:12.800
<v Speaker 3>what's up? And if you don't like Christianity, consider Pluto

1668
01:38:13.079 --> 01:38:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Plutonism named after Pluto. Javon On, mute man, what's up?

1669
01:38:18.560 --> 01:38:18.800
<v Speaker 14>Hello?

1670
01:38:19.039 --> 01:38:22.720
<v Speaker 11>I was coming on here to kind of talk about

1671
01:38:23.680 --> 01:38:29.439
<v Speaker 11>the cannon and like, second, maccabees, would you be willing.

1672
01:38:29.239 --> 01:38:29.880
<v Speaker 2>To discuss that?

1673
01:38:32.399 --> 01:38:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

1674
01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what's up?

1675
01:38:35.960 --> 01:38:38.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? So I just was wondering, like like just like

1676
01:38:38.920 --> 01:38:42.039
<v Speaker 11>for the basis of like my argument, like you would

1677
01:38:42.079 --> 01:38:47.199
<v Speaker 11>agree that apostle and prophet, for example, are have the

1678
01:38:47.279 --> 01:38:53.760
<v Speaker 11>same authority from Jesus Christ to you know, have be

1679
01:38:53.880 --> 01:38:54.760
<v Speaker 11>given revelation.

1680
01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, I'm sorry, could you repeat that? As somebody was messaging?

1681
01:39:00.199 --> 01:39:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Can repeat that last point.

1682
01:39:02.359 --> 01:39:04.880
<v Speaker 11>That profits I'm not a Mormon, by the way, Like

1683
01:39:05.039 --> 01:39:07.800
<v Speaker 11>I'm not trying to make like an argument. I'm saying

1684
01:39:07.840 --> 01:39:11.640
<v Speaker 11>that Christ chose the apostles and they have the same

1685
01:39:12.039 --> 01:39:17.439
<v Speaker 11>authority as the prophets to receive revelations. That's that's my

1686
01:39:17.960 --> 01:39:20.039
<v Speaker 11>first point. Like do you agree with that?

1687
01:39:20.479 --> 01:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1688
01:39:21.960 --> 01:39:22.239
<v Speaker 8>Okay?

1689
01:39:22.760 --> 01:39:29.000
<v Speaker 11>So my next point is that scripture requires a living

1690
01:39:29.159 --> 01:39:36.079
<v Speaker 11>prophet or a living apostle to approve or author scripture.

1691
01:39:36.720 --> 01:39:43.880
<v Speaker 11>Would you agree with that, like the Twelve including Matthias

1692
01:39:44.039 --> 01:39:49.560
<v Speaker 11>Paul or any of the profits of the Old Testament,

1693
01:39:49.680 --> 01:39:54.039
<v Speaker 11>like they have the authority and they would be needed

1694
01:39:54.199 --> 01:39:57.000
<v Speaker 11>to approve or author scripture.

1695
01:39:58.680 --> 01:40:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, the I mean divine revelation is written by

1696
01:40:04.760 --> 01:40:09.399
<v Speaker 3>in the New Testament, those people appointed to do it.

1697
01:40:09.520 --> 01:40:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay.

1698
01:40:11.520 --> 01:40:15.079
<v Speaker 11>So then my third point is that Second Maccabee's and

1699
01:40:15.359 --> 01:40:18.800
<v Speaker 11>some of the books of the Dudo Cannon do not

1700
01:40:19.079 --> 01:40:23.680
<v Speaker 11>have a living capital p or capital a apostle or

1701
01:40:23.840 --> 01:40:28.399
<v Speaker 11>prophet to authorize or author that scripture.

1702
01:40:29.560 --> 01:40:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh you said up, I thought were talking about the

1703
01:40:31.279 --> 01:40:33.760
<v Speaker 3>New Testament. So no, I would not I would not

1704
01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:42.359
<v Speaker 3>conceive that, Okay, that there's some self evident criteria that

1705
01:40:43.199 --> 01:40:49.159
<v Speaker 3>canonical scripture can only be written by some living appointed prophet.

1706
01:40:49.479 --> 01:40:50.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that that's.

1707
01:40:52.479 --> 01:40:53.159
<v Speaker 11>We're authorized.

1708
01:40:53.600 --> 01:40:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Well who authorizes? What what do you mean?

1709
01:40:57.600 --> 01:41:01.079
<v Speaker 11>Like when Peters and second p so like Second Peter

1710
01:41:02.760 --> 01:41:08.279
<v Speaker 11>Chapter one, when he's talking about prophecy never had its

1711
01:41:08.359 --> 01:41:12.359
<v Speaker 11>origins with human will, but God gave it to the prophets,

1712
01:41:13.239 --> 01:41:16.880
<v Speaker 11>and that would include him and the Old Testament prophets.

1713
01:41:18.479 --> 01:41:19.960
<v Speaker 11>You would require one of them.

1714
01:41:22.319 --> 01:41:29.079
<v Speaker 3>But that isn't laying out necessarily the basis for a canon,

1715
01:41:29.319 --> 01:41:36.960
<v Speaker 3>because we already have. I mean, does Ezra I'm just

1716
01:41:37.039 --> 01:41:39.199
<v Speaker 3>thinking out loud, does Ezra prophesy?

1717
01:41:41.760 --> 01:41:44.520
<v Speaker 11>I don't think he necessarily has to, but I think

1718
01:41:44.600 --> 01:41:49.760
<v Speaker 11>the presence of a prophet to confirm that revelation is

1719
01:41:49.960 --> 01:41:54.039
<v Speaker 11>required because my problem we're running into issues.

1720
01:41:54.319 --> 01:41:59.119
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, wait a minute. The Book of Wisdom prophesies Christ.

1721
01:42:00.079 --> 01:42:03.840
<v Speaker 3>If Wisdom prophesied Christ, why wouldn't that meet the criteria

1722
01:42:03.880 --> 01:42:04.960
<v Speaker 3>of prophecy.

1723
01:42:06.560 --> 01:42:12.560
<v Speaker 11>Because I think there's specific like capital peep like not everybody.

1724
01:42:12.640 --> 01:42:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so now it's capital P versus. So now you've

1725
01:42:16.840 --> 01:42:20.039
<v Speaker 3>added another You've moved the goalpost that it's not prophetic.

1726
01:42:20.359 --> 01:42:24.399
<v Speaker 3>It's now it's a special capital P. Well, how do

1727
01:42:24.479 --> 01:42:25.479
<v Speaker 3>we know that because.

1728
01:42:26.239 --> 01:42:31.720
<v Speaker 11>The apostles are only allowed to are Do you agree

1729
01:42:31.760 --> 01:42:31.920
<v Speaker 11>with that?

1730
01:42:32.039 --> 01:42:35.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm talking about the Book of the Book of Wisdom.

1731
01:42:36.800 --> 01:42:39.760
<v Speaker 3>If that prophesies Christ, why does it not fit into

1732
01:42:39.800 --> 01:42:41.079
<v Speaker 3>your criteria of prophecy.

1733
01:42:42.439 --> 01:42:46.079
<v Speaker 11>I believe that a living apostle or a living prophet

1734
01:42:46.880 --> 01:42:48.520
<v Speaker 11>was able to confirm.

1735
01:42:48.760 --> 01:42:50.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, how do you know that the writer of the

1736
01:42:50.079 --> 01:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Book of Wisdom wasn't a living prophet?

1737
01:42:53.479 --> 01:42:57.840
<v Speaker 11>It's not that the person who authored the book. The

1738
01:42:57.960 --> 01:43:00.760
<v Speaker 11>person who authored it doesn't have to be a prophet.

1739
01:43:01.039 --> 01:43:02.319
<v Speaker 11>What I'm saying is, there's.

1740
01:43:02.239 --> 01:43:04.640
<v Speaker 3>A okay, so how about this? Okay, I see what

1741
01:43:04.680 --> 01:43:07.079
<v Speaker 3>you're saying. So how about this the New Testament writer's

1742
01:43:07.359 --> 01:43:11.560
<v Speaker 3>default approve of the Judo canonical text by citing them

1743
01:43:11.600 --> 01:43:14.960
<v Speaker 3>many times and using the septuagent, which includes the dudo count.

1744
01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:15.319
<v Speaker 3>And how's that?

1745
01:43:17.600 --> 01:43:21.239
<v Speaker 11>I don't agree with that because not only were they

1746
01:43:21.359 --> 01:43:22.640
<v Speaker 11>not present at the time?

1747
01:43:23.319 --> 01:43:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Who not president at the time? What are you talking about?

1748
01:43:27.239 --> 01:43:28.960
<v Speaker 11>They weren't present at the time of its writing.

1749
01:43:29.039 --> 01:43:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but hold on, what are you talking about? Of course,

1750
01:43:33.239 --> 01:43:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Peter's not going to be how is Peter going to be?

1751
01:43:36.119 --> 01:43:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Hold on? So now, how is Peter going to be

1752
01:43:38.640 --> 01:43:41.239
<v Speaker 3>present at the writing of the Book of Wisdom?

1753
01:43:43.079 --> 01:43:44.359
<v Speaker 11>Another prophet is.

1754
01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:49.760
<v Speaker 3>What what are you talking about? I don't understand. Can

1755
01:43:49.800 --> 01:43:50.680
<v Speaker 3>you explain what you're saying?

1756
01:43:50.680 --> 01:43:55.279
<v Speaker 11>On or sign yes? So Nathan would be around during

1757
01:43:55.359 --> 01:43:56.560
<v Speaker 11>the time of Solomon.

1758
01:43:56.319 --> 01:44:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, I mean he's during the time of David. Maybe

1759
01:44:02.159 --> 01:44:05.119
<v Speaker 3>he lived into Solomon's days, Okay, yeah he did.

1760
01:44:05.279 --> 01:44:09.800
<v Speaker 11>And I'm saying that those those prophets were authorized by God.

1761
01:44:10.520 --> 01:44:14.479
<v Speaker 11>And so what I'm my main argument is that no

1762
01:44:15.079 --> 01:44:20.039
<v Speaker 11>profit who is able to have the authority to author,

1763
01:44:20.880 --> 01:44:25.640
<v Speaker 11>author authorized, or or even write scripture is alive during

1764
01:44:25.720 --> 01:44:28.239
<v Speaker 11>the time of second mccabee's writing.

1765
01:44:28.760 --> 01:44:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Like that is my main argument.

1766
01:44:31.359 --> 01:44:34.119
<v Speaker 3>So you have a presupposition that the only text that

1767
01:44:34.199 --> 01:44:38.199
<v Speaker 3>can be included are quote authorized prophets. And I'm giving

1768
01:44:38.239 --> 01:44:42.239
<v Speaker 3>you examples of how why wouldn't the Book of Maccabe's.

1769
01:44:42.279 --> 01:44:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Let me see, the Book of Wisdom fit into this

1770
01:44:45.119 --> 01:44:48.720
<v Speaker 3>criteria because it prophesies, and how do we know that

1771
01:44:48.800 --> 01:44:50.560
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a prophet that wrote the Book of Wisdom.

1772
01:44:53.760 --> 01:44:57.399
<v Speaker 11>Well, my my contention isn't with the Book of Wisdom.

1773
01:44:57.479 --> 01:44:59.800
<v Speaker 11>It's my contention is with Seco mcabees.

1774
01:45:00.600 --> 01:45:03.039
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, if so, what you're you're going to

1775
01:45:03.039 --> 01:45:05.560
<v Speaker 3>be the one guy who believes that the wisdom can

1776
01:45:05.640 --> 01:45:07.600
<v Speaker 3>be in the cannon, but just not maccabe's.

1777
01:45:09.880 --> 01:45:12.760
<v Speaker 11>I just don't think that that has to be included

1778
01:45:12.840 --> 01:45:14.960
<v Speaker 11>with my argument, That is all I'm saying.

1779
01:45:15.159 --> 01:45:18.079
<v Speaker 3>But the basis for your argument is arbitrary because now

1780
01:45:18.159 --> 01:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not about prophecy, it's about a criteria that you

1781
01:45:21.800 --> 01:45:24.920
<v Speaker 3>have asserted, is there must be a living prophet at

1782
01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the time that authorizes it. Where do you get this?

1783
01:45:27.640 --> 01:45:33.640
<v Speaker 11>I different, well, that that God delivers revelation to only

1784
01:45:33.800 --> 01:45:36.520
<v Speaker 11>certain people, like only.

1785
01:45:36.920 --> 01:45:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Like, how does that tell you that Maccabee's isn't isn't?

1786
01:45:40.720 --> 01:45:45.000
<v Speaker 3>How about this? The Church has the authority to authorize

1787
01:45:45.520 --> 01:45:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the canon of Scripture and it authorizes Macabees. How's that?

1788
01:45:50.479 --> 01:45:50.680
<v Speaker 8>See?

1789
01:45:50.760 --> 01:45:51.399
<v Speaker 14>I can.

1790
01:45:53.439 --> 01:45:56.159
<v Speaker 11>We can talk about that point. I just think that

1791
01:45:56.680 --> 01:46:03.720
<v Speaker 11>because the because Paul sites like right epimenities these Greek philosophers.

1792
01:46:04.399 --> 01:46:06.279
<v Speaker 11>But that doesn't necessarily mean just.

1793
01:46:06.800 --> 01:46:09.479
<v Speaker 3>But nobody says that just because yeah, but nobody's arguing

1794
01:46:09.520 --> 01:46:11.479
<v Speaker 3>that just because it's citing the New Testament is therefore

1795
01:46:11.520 --> 01:46:13.279
<v Speaker 3>in the canon. I never made that argument.

1796
01:46:14.319 --> 01:46:17.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah no, And I'm not accusing you that. I've simply

1797
01:46:18.640 --> 01:46:22.199
<v Speaker 11>just wanted to be like, is would your your criteria

1798
01:46:22.319 --> 01:46:28.439
<v Speaker 11>does not include that a profit be present or authorized?

1799
01:46:28.840 --> 01:46:29.479
<v Speaker 8>Because I just.

1800
01:46:29.560 --> 01:46:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Haven't, Like, I just don't know where you're even getting

1801
01:46:31.359 --> 01:46:34.600
<v Speaker 3>this criteria, Like it's it's this you're asserting it, But

1802
01:46:34.760 --> 01:46:36.119
<v Speaker 3>where is that from? How do you know that?

1803
01:46:37.119 --> 01:46:40.399
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? So second Peter, if you you know two Peter,

1804
01:46:40.840 --> 01:46:43.520
<v Speaker 11>chapter one, ninety, But.

1805
01:46:43.560 --> 01:46:46.319
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't tell you anything about the canon. That's just

1806
01:46:46.399 --> 01:46:50.079
<v Speaker 3>Peter talking about inspiration. How does that tell you that

1807
01:46:50.199 --> 01:46:52.359
<v Speaker 3>this How does that tell you that the principle that

1808
01:46:52.399 --> 01:46:56.239
<v Speaker 3>you're asserting is proven. Just because Peter says that no

1809
01:46:56.439 --> 01:46:58.920
<v Speaker 3>prophet spoke of his own but was moved by the

1810
01:46:58.960 --> 01:47:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Holy Spirit, that doesn't tell you that quote. A prophet

1811
01:47:01.880 --> 01:47:05.600
<v Speaker 3>must be present to authorize the writing of a text,

1812
01:47:07.119 --> 01:47:08.439
<v Speaker 3>and how do you know that there was? How do

1813
01:47:08.479 --> 01:47:11.119
<v Speaker 3>you know that there wasn't a prophet present in the

1814
01:47:11.199 --> 01:47:13.119
<v Speaker 3>days of the Maccabees or the writing of Wisdom?

1815
01:47:14.279 --> 01:47:18.800
<v Speaker 11>Because I believe God makes a specific point that Malachi

1816
01:47:19.680 --> 01:47:23.119
<v Speaker 11>is the Honestly, some people make the argument that it's

1817
01:47:23.239 --> 01:47:27.319
<v Speaker 11>Zechariah because Jesus mentioned Zacharia being murdered in the temple,

1818
01:47:28.079 --> 01:47:30.720
<v Speaker 11>so some people think that Zachariah was the last prophet

1819
01:47:30.800 --> 01:47:34.159
<v Speaker 11>to live. But since we placed Malachi at the end.

1820
01:47:34.600 --> 01:47:38.760
<v Speaker 11>In Malachi's message is that God is going to send Elijah,

1821
01:47:39.199 --> 01:47:40.279
<v Speaker 11>Oh Jesus.

1822
01:47:40.159 --> 01:47:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's just you're assuming that it's because of the

1823
01:47:43.239 --> 01:47:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Protestant placement of the books, that that's the end. That's

1824
01:47:47.640 --> 01:47:49.479
<v Speaker 3>a Protestant placement of the books. So it doesn't mean

1825
01:47:49.560 --> 01:47:52.640
<v Speaker 3>it's the last of that nobody prophesied during that time.

1826
01:47:54.520 --> 01:47:56.439
<v Speaker 11>Well I'm well, I'm saying.

1827
01:47:56.479 --> 01:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's an argument from silence, No.

1828
01:47:59.399 --> 01:48:04.399
<v Speaker 11>The message of Malachi four, Malachi four or five, when God.

1829
01:48:04.279 --> 01:48:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Says he's going to Okay, So do you know how

1830
01:48:07.479 --> 01:48:10.399
<v Speaker 3>like the Orthodox Bible, how what its last book is.

1831
01:48:13.239 --> 01:48:15.800
<v Speaker 3>It's Daniel. So the fact that it's ordered in that

1832
01:48:15.960 --> 01:48:18.600
<v Speaker 3>way and your Protestant Bible doesn't mean that it's the

1833
01:48:18.720 --> 01:48:21.039
<v Speaker 3>last of the prophets. So you're reading into all this

1834
01:48:21.119 --> 01:48:23.079
<v Speaker 3>stuff a bunch of the Protestant assumptions.

1835
01:48:25.880 --> 01:48:27.960
<v Speaker 11>I can see that, and again I concede it like

1836
01:48:28.199 --> 01:48:32.920
<v Speaker 11>some people believe it's zacharias Jesus mentions him being you

1837
01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:37.359
<v Speaker 11>know from I can't remember the first prophet he said.

1838
01:48:37.239 --> 01:48:39.119
<v Speaker 3>How do you know that these principles are the case?

1839
01:48:39.159 --> 01:48:42.199
<v Speaker 3>You just keep asserting that this is how it works,

1840
01:48:43.079 --> 01:48:47.840
<v Speaker 3>And on what basis? Where does this how do we

1841
01:48:47.960 --> 01:48:52.760
<v Speaker 3>know that this is the case? Well, I mean, where

1842
01:48:52.760 --> 01:48:55.920
<v Speaker 3>does Peter. Peter doesn't say he's laying out a cannon principle.

1843
01:48:56.359 --> 01:48:59.399
<v Speaker 3>He's just talking about inspiration. So where is that where

1844
01:48:59.439 --> 01:48:59.840
<v Speaker 3>you're getting that?

1845
01:49:01.119 --> 01:49:04.439
<v Speaker 11>Well, we must agree on some point that not everybody

1846
01:49:04.600 --> 01:49:06.560
<v Speaker 11>who author scripture correct.

1847
01:49:07.159 --> 01:49:10.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, but that's an argument from silence. That doesn't

1848
01:49:10.359 --> 01:49:13.960
<v Speaker 3>prove your positive case about there must be some living

1849
01:49:14.039 --> 01:49:16.079
<v Speaker 3>profit president who confirms it that we know.

1850
01:49:18.359 --> 01:49:22.039
<v Speaker 11>So okay, I'm sorry, Maybe I should have asked your

1851
01:49:22.880 --> 01:49:27.520
<v Speaker 11>assertions first. So do you what do you believe is

1852
01:49:27.640 --> 01:49:32.199
<v Speaker 11>the basis of what should be considered scripture? Like is

1853
01:49:32.279 --> 01:49:37.199
<v Speaker 11>there any authorship like criteria?

1854
01:49:38.520 --> 01:49:41.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, authorship plays a role. Like Matthew, the

1855
01:49:41.319 --> 01:49:44.479
<v Speaker 3>disciple of Christ needs to be the Matthew that we

1856
01:49:44.600 --> 01:49:47.000
<v Speaker 3>think he is. But we only know that from the

1857
01:49:47.039 --> 01:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>tradition of the Church, because Matthew doesn't tell us who

1858
01:49:49.680 --> 01:49:54.119
<v Speaker 3>that is. So we need external witnesses as well as

1859
01:49:54.279 --> 01:49:57.520
<v Speaker 3>internal witnesses. I don't deny there's internal you know, Peter

1860
01:49:57.680 --> 01:50:00.359
<v Speaker 3>refers to Paul's text as scripture. I don't have a

1861
01:50:00.359 --> 01:50:02.720
<v Speaker 3>problem with any of that. None of that proves any

1862
01:50:02.720 --> 01:50:06.359
<v Speaker 3>of the Protestant arguments for solo scriptura or that they

1863
01:50:06.439 --> 01:50:09.239
<v Speaker 3>can derive the canon through some sort of you know,

1864
01:50:09.399 --> 01:50:15.720
<v Speaker 3>arbitrary you know, personal reason he left, so whatever. It's like,

1865
01:50:16.279 --> 01:50:18.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Protestants missed the point when it comes to

1866
01:50:19.279 --> 01:50:23.279
<v Speaker 3>when we ask them for the epistemic principle, they just

1867
01:50:23.359 --> 01:50:26.359
<v Speaker 3>keep sort of asserting, well, it's this, Oh, but it's this,

1868
01:50:26.760 --> 01:50:29.319
<v Speaker 3>you see, Well, because we all agree with this, it's

1869
01:50:29.359 --> 01:50:33.119
<v Speaker 3>got to be this. None of that addresses when I

1870
01:50:33.239 --> 01:50:37.840
<v Speaker 3>ask about epistemic criteria. So I wasn't trying to be

1871
01:50:37.920 --> 01:50:39.960
<v Speaker 3>mean to that guy. I don't know if maybe he's

1872
01:50:40.720 --> 01:50:43.800
<v Speaker 3>dropped off like his sel cut out, or he just left.

1873
01:50:43.840 --> 01:50:47.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Levka two dollars, Thank you so much,

1874
01:50:48.079 --> 01:50:52.079
<v Speaker 3>Levka eight five dollars. If the apostles follow the subtuagent,

1875
01:50:52.680 --> 01:50:54.600
<v Speaker 3>why is there such a problem or controversy the Old

1876
01:50:54.640 --> 01:51:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Testament canon amongst the church fathers. Well, not all the

1877
01:51:02.239 --> 01:51:07.520
<v Speaker 3>church fathers necessarily knew what all the apostles were doing,

1878
01:51:07.800 --> 01:51:10.760
<v Speaker 3>precisely because the evidence that they would have looked at

1879
01:51:11.279 --> 01:51:14.199
<v Speaker 3>to see what the apostles were doing was in question.

1880
01:51:16.399 --> 01:51:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But again, the majority of the church fathers do include

1881
01:51:21.399 --> 01:51:26.199
<v Speaker 3>due to econonical texts. So why wouldn't if you're a Protestant,

1882
01:51:26.279 --> 01:51:28.720
<v Speaker 3>why wouldn't you just go with the majority of the

1883
01:51:28.840 --> 01:51:32.920
<v Speaker 3>church father's position. But of course it presents a problem

1884
01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:35.960
<v Speaker 3>for them, so they have to go to pick and

1885
01:51:36.079 --> 01:51:38.399
<v Speaker 3>choose this or that church father, which really it's only

1886
01:51:38.720 --> 01:51:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Jerome is the only one they have. So I don't

1887
01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:51.000
<v Speaker 3>like people talking smack, like, why don't you just hop

1888
01:51:51.079 --> 01:51:53.720
<v Speaker 3>on in the stream instead of arguing in the chat.

1889
01:51:53.800 --> 01:52:03.800
<v Speaker 3>You guys are frightful, a bunch of frightful children. I've

1890
01:52:03.840 --> 01:52:05.760
<v Speaker 3>had about enough. I think I don't think I could

1891
01:52:05.760 --> 01:52:07.439
<v Speaker 3>take much more. You guys want to support the stream,

1892
01:52:07.439 --> 01:52:12.159
<v Speaker 3>you can do so by going over to chalk dot

1893
01:52:12.279 --> 01:52:15.079
<v Speaker 3>com c choq dot com. Use the promo code J

1894
01:52:15.319 --> 01:52:19.279
<v Speaker 3>forty to get forty percent off all of those products.

1895
01:52:19.319 --> 01:52:22.039
<v Speaker 3>You can test them out with the J forty promo

1896
01:52:22.359 --> 01:52:24.159
<v Speaker 3>or you can do J forty four live that's J

1897
01:52:24.479 --> 01:52:26.359
<v Speaker 3>y four four L A F E to get forty

1898
01:52:26.399 --> 01:52:29.640
<v Speaker 3>four percent off those great products over at chalk dot com.

1899
01:52:31.800 --> 01:52:36.760
<v Speaker 3>If you use that promo code, it is a recurring subscription. Okay,

1900
01:52:36.760 --> 01:52:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll go to I'm only going to you if you disagree.

1901
01:52:38.840 --> 01:52:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing you know, anything but disagreements, so you

1902
01:52:45.399 --> 01:52:48.039
<v Speaker 3>can unsubscribe at any time if you want to use

1903
01:52:48.720 --> 01:52:55.319
<v Speaker 3>chalk dot com. I don't see anybody else. I thank

1904
01:52:55.319 --> 01:52:58.560
<v Speaker 3>you guys a lot of fun tonight. If you would

1905
01:53:00.640 --> 01:53:09.279
<v Speaker 3>feel free to clip this, feel free to so I

1906
01:53:09.359 --> 01:53:13.760
<v Speaker 3>see people in the chat or like people not understand,

1907
01:53:13.840 --> 01:53:18.640
<v Speaker 3>like just asserting that this is the principle. Competer's epistle

1908
01:53:18.720 --> 01:53:21.239
<v Speaker 3>doesn't say that this is the principle of canonicity, right,

1909
01:53:21.319 --> 01:53:25.039
<v Speaker 3>that's an interpretation. Maybe his interpretation is correct, but even

1910
01:53:25.119 --> 01:53:29.960
<v Speaker 3>his interpretation, like all he was arguing is that this

1911
01:53:30.079 --> 01:53:35.159
<v Speaker 3>shows me that Maccabees isn't canonical. But there's nobody in

1912
01:53:35.239 --> 01:53:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the world who believes that
