WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Lucky Land Casino asking people what's the weirdest place you've

2
00:00:03.640 --> 00:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten lucky?

3
00:00:04.679 --> 00:00:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Lucky in line at the Delhi I guess ah, in

4
00:00:07.480 --> 00:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>my dentist's office more than once.

5
00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Actually do I have to say?

6
00:00:11.320 --> 00:00:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes? You do?

7
00:00:12.080 --> 00:00:14.519
<v Speaker 3>In the car before my kids pta meeting?

8
00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Really?

9
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

10
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me? What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

11
00:00:18.359 --> 00:00:19.399
<v Speaker 6>I never win?

12
00:00:19.480 --> 00:00:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And tell well, there you have it.

13
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You could get lucky anywhere playing at lucky landslots dot com.

14
00:00:24.160 --> 00:00:26.559
<v Speaker 4>Play for free right now? Are you feeling lucky?

15
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:28.600
<v Speaker 7>Nobri just necesaryfoid? We're gonna be my long eighteen plus

16
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:30.160
<v Speaker 7>terms conditions of pluck seems every details.

17
00:00:30.480 --> 00:00:32.840
<v Speaker 8>Hello, it is Ryan and we could all use an

18
00:00:32.840 --> 00:00:35.119
<v Speaker 8>extra bright spot in our day, couldn't we? Just to

19
00:00:35.159 --> 00:00:38.039
<v Speaker 8>make up for things like sitting in traffic, doing the dishes,

20
00:00:38.200 --> 00:00:40.799
<v Speaker 8>counting or steps, you know, all the mundane stuff. That

21
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:43.320
<v Speaker 8>is why I'm such a big fan of Chumba Casino.

22
00:00:43.439 --> 00:00:46.759
<v Speaker 8>Chumbuck Casino has all your favorite social casino style games

23
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:50.920
<v Speaker 8>you can play for free anytime anywhere with daily bonuses.

24
00:00:51.079 --> 00:00:53.479
<v Speaker 8>That's you brighten your day, Lowe actually a lot, so

25
00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:56.880
<v Speaker 8>sign up now at Chumbuck Casino dot com. That's Chumbuck

26
00:00:56.920 --> 00:00:59.719
<v Speaker 8>casino dot com, No pusses every where, every I lost

27
00:00:59.759 --> 00:01:00.159
<v Speaker 8>e terms.

28
00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Lop to.

29
00:01:11.959 --> 00:01:15.359
<v Speaker 9>You are now listening to True Murder The most shocking

30
00:01:15.480 --> 00:01:18.480
<v Speaker 9>Killers in True crime History and the authors that have

31
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:25.840
<v Speaker 9>written about them. Gasey, Bundy, Dahmer, The Nightstalker BTK. Every

32
00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:29.519
<v Speaker 9>week another fascinating author talking about the most shocking and

33
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:34.159
<v Speaker 9>infamous killers in true crime history. True Murder with your host,

34
00:01:34.599 --> 00:01:37.079
<v Speaker 9>journalist and author Dan Zupansky.

35
00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:50.560
<v Speaker 10>Good evening. This is your host Dan Zupanski for the

36
00:01:50.599 --> 00:01:53.719
<v Speaker 10>program True Murder, The most shocking killers in true crime

37
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:57.239
<v Speaker 10>history and the authors that have written about them. The

38
00:01:57.319 --> 00:02:01.400
<v Speaker 10>twenty eleven Casey Anthony trial came the most sensational news

39
00:02:01.439 --> 00:02:04.920
<v Speaker 10>story of the year. Time magazine called it the social

40
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:08.319
<v Speaker 10>media trial of the century. The twenty two year old

41
00:02:08.400 --> 00:02:11.840
<v Speaker 10>single mum was charged with three felonies, including first degree murder,

42
00:02:12.520 --> 00:02:17.599
<v Speaker 10>aggravated child abuse, and manslaughter. When pictures surfaced on the

43
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:20.199
<v Speaker 10>Internet showing her at a night club shortly after her

44
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:23.599
<v Speaker 10>two year old daughter, Kaylee went missing, the media in

45
00:02:23.719 --> 00:02:29.080
<v Speaker 10>public went ballistic. Thirty one days passed after Caylee disappeared

46
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:32.400
<v Speaker 10>before police were notified, and then it was not mother Casey,

47
00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:35.360
<v Speaker 10>but her family that called police and they were pointing

48
00:02:35.439 --> 00:02:39.039
<v Speaker 10>fingers at her. The trial resembled in many ways the

49
00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:43.199
<v Speaker 10>Roman Colosseum, where crowds thirsted to see lions devour the

50
00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:47.719
<v Speaker 10>captured prisoner. Internet blogs exploded, just as the Roman crowds

51
00:02:47.800 --> 00:02:51.960
<v Speaker 10>must have, with demands for execution. The trials. Streaming videos

52
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.560
<v Speaker 10>and interactive blogs left the public demanding to see an

53
00:02:54.560 --> 00:02:58.719
<v Speaker 10>embodiment of Caesar give his final thumbs down against their prize.

54
00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:03.680
<v Speaker 10>Raal jury was another matter. Jurors cried as the evidence

55
00:03:03.759 --> 00:03:06.319
<v Speaker 10>against her was so thin that they had no choice

56
00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:11.719
<v Speaker 10>but to find Casey Anthony not guilty. Almost unnoticed, a

57
00:03:11.759 --> 00:03:15.159
<v Speaker 10>few leading journalists protested the media carnival that became the

58
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:19.120
<v Speaker 10>Casey Anthony trial. They objected to the one sided narrative

59
00:03:19.199 --> 00:03:22.159
<v Speaker 10>informing the court of public opinion forgetting there is a

60
00:03:22.199 --> 00:03:26.840
<v Speaker 10>difference between someone appearing guilty and the requirement that prosecutors

61
00:03:26.919 --> 00:03:29.800
<v Speaker 10>need to prove in court. The media's coverage is something

62
00:03:29.879 --> 00:03:33.560
<v Speaker 10>we should discuss, beginning with did police arrest the wrong person?

63
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:37.280
<v Speaker 10>Was the jury right deciding Casey Anthony was not guilty?

64
00:03:37.879 --> 00:03:40.080
<v Speaker 10>Was Casey's mother involved in a cover up of a

65
00:03:40.199 --> 00:03:44.879
<v Speaker 10>crime against Kayley, and who was Cindy protecting Casey or

66
00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:49.479
<v Speaker 10>her husband George. The book that we're discussing this evening

67
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:52.639
<v Speaker 10>and the story that we were discussing this evening is

68
00:03:52.719 --> 00:03:56.120
<v Speaker 10>the media's court of public opinion Casey Anthony, with my

69
00:03:56.199 --> 00:04:00.360
<v Speaker 10>special guest Keith Long. Journalist and author Keith longcome to

70
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:02.360
<v Speaker 10>the program, and thank you for agreeing to this interview.

71
00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:03.039
<v Speaker 10>Keith Long.

72
00:04:04.360 --> 00:04:06.680
<v Speaker 11>Thank you so much. Dan. It's my pleasure to be here.

73
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:10.319
<v Speaker 11>And I've never heard my own words expressed so well

74
00:04:10.360 --> 00:04:11.000
<v Speaker 11>as you just did.

75
00:04:11.879 --> 00:04:15.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, thank you very much. Now, this, as you know,

76
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:18.639
<v Speaker 10>and of course anyone that's going to tune into this

77
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:22.240
<v Speaker 10>program and hopefully for those who that listen unless they've

78
00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:26.000
<v Speaker 10>been on another planet, everyone is familiar with this, very

79
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:30.319
<v Speaker 10>familiar with this case and this trial and this entire story.

80
00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:35.439
<v Speaker 10>And it is fair to say that Casey Anthony is

81
00:04:35.600 --> 00:04:41.360
<v Speaker 10>one of the most reviled persons in America and possibly worldwide,

82
00:04:41.399 --> 00:04:45.079
<v Speaker 10>but especially America. When you see the extent with Halloween

83
00:04:45.240 --> 00:04:49.160
<v Speaker 10>Max people going out for Halloween, it's Casey Anthony's. It

84
00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:54.319
<v Speaker 10>really was a circus and a carnival and very you know,

85
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:59.160
<v Speaker 10>obviously interesting story that that fascinated.

86
00:04:58.680 --> 00:05:01.399
<v Speaker 11>A lot of people to that point, Dan, And I'm

87
00:05:01.439 --> 00:05:05.399
<v Speaker 11>a research journalist and the article, part of the article

88
00:05:05.439 --> 00:05:09.240
<v Speaker 11>you quoted from was for my article for Harvard Harvard's

89
00:05:09.319 --> 00:05:14.120
<v Speaker 11>NIEME Information for Journalism, and my editor for the project

90
00:05:14.560 --> 00:05:19.399
<v Speaker 11>was Barry Sussman, who was some people recognized the name.

91
00:05:19.480 --> 00:05:23.480
<v Speaker 11>He was Bob Woodwards and Kyle Bernstein's editor for the

92
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:27.560
<v Speaker 11>Washington Post when they exposed the Watergate series. So his

93
00:05:27.759 --> 00:05:33.519
<v Speaker 11>standards for sourcing for the content of the article were very,

94
00:05:33.879 --> 00:05:38.399
<v Speaker 11>very high, and I maintained that same high standard for

95
00:05:38.639 --> 00:05:42.279
<v Speaker 11>my sourcing in my book. And also I might mention

96
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:46.800
<v Speaker 11>I as have a backup source for your comment about

97
00:05:47.199 --> 00:05:51.800
<v Speaker 11>Kasey Anthony being the most reviled and hated person in America.

98
00:05:51.920 --> 00:05:55.319
<v Speaker 11>Certainly there were two polls down of course, in twenty

99
00:05:55.480 --> 00:06:01.120
<v Speaker 11>eleven after she was acquitted, found her the most in America,

100
00:06:01.240 --> 00:06:05.000
<v Speaker 11>and then a year after she had been in seclusion,

101
00:06:05.240 --> 00:06:08.600
<v Speaker 11>in twenty twelve and a year after her acquittal, she

102
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:12.120
<v Speaker 11>was voted again the most stated person in America. So

103
00:06:12.279 --> 00:06:13.639
<v Speaker 11>you're right on target with your.

104
00:06:13.560 --> 00:06:21.079
<v Speaker 10>Analysis right now. The thing is is that there's a

105
00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:24.040
<v Speaker 10>big difference between and we don't want to harp on

106
00:06:24.120 --> 00:06:25.920
<v Speaker 10>this and go back into this. Can anybody listened to

107
00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:30.600
<v Speaker 10>this program is not a novice and not a person

108
00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:33.519
<v Speaker 10>that is coming to this subject and these types of

109
00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:37.240
<v Speaker 10>conversations for the first time. So let's not deal with

110
00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:39.959
<v Speaker 10>those people, because there's not any of those really listening

111
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:44.240
<v Speaker 10>to this program. I'm sure. Obviously the prosecution didn't have

112
00:06:45.920 --> 00:06:49.199
<v Speaker 10>didn't present their case in a strong enough fashion or

113
00:06:49.279 --> 00:06:54.319
<v Speaker 10>a they just did not state their case effectively. Hence

114
00:06:54.399 --> 00:07:00.759
<v Speaker 10>the jury made the decision to acquit Casey Anthony. So

115
00:07:00.879 --> 00:07:03.839
<v Speaker 10>let's not go there. They obviously the jury and the

116
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:06.680
<v Speaker 10>system and and so some people say, well, you know,

117
00:07:06.759 --> 00:07:11.000
<v Speaker 10>the system worked or the judicial system. It was a

118
00:07:11.079 --> 00:07:14.079
<v Speaker 10>circumstantial case. Obviously everyone knows that.

119
00:07:16.360 --> 00:07:18.079
<v Speaker 11>Can I make one comment about that point?

120
00:07:18.959 --> 00:07:20.720
<v Speaker 10>Okay? Uh.

121
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:25.439
<v Speaker 11>The what was interesting in my research for the trial

122
00:07:27.319 --> 00:07:32.360
<v Speaker 11>was the jury's uh, there's settlers and didn't make public

123
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:36.959
<v Speaker 11>comments about their liberations, about what they thought about Casey,

124
00:07:37.879 --> 00:07:41.879
<v Speaker 11>why they voted to a quit and the rest of

125
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:46.199
<v Speaker 11>them were afraid to say anything public and they've been

126
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:51.720
<v Speaker 11>in effectively in hiding Aaron Panallas County, Florida, which is

127
00:07:52.120 --> 00:07:55.959
<v Speaker 11>the Tampa Bay area roughly speaking on the west coast

128
00:07:56.040 --> 00:08:00.000
<v Speaker 11>where I live. Uh, And you won't they're trying to

129
00:08:00.480 --> 00:08:02.839
<v Speaker 11>disguise who they are, the fact that they were members

130
00:08:02.879 --> 00:08:06.560
<v Speaker 11>of the jury to every level they can and because

131
00:08:07.639 --> 00:08:09.319
<v Speaker 11>a lot of them got their threats, a lot of

132
00:08:09.399 --> 00:08:16.399
<v Speaker 11>them were objects of abuse and the derision for their decision.

133
00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:21.800
<v Speaker 11>But from my standpoint as a research journalist, Dan, what

134
00:08:22.040 --> 00:08:25.600
<v Speaker 11>they said was what the foreman confirmed in a one

135
00:08:25.639 --> 00:08:27.399
<v Speaker 11>hour actually I think it was a two hour, two

136
00:08:27.439 --> 00:08:31.360
<v Speaker 11>part interview on television, was that the jury was not

137
00:08:31.519 --> 00:08:36.360
<v Speaker 11>sympathetic to the defendant. They did not like a sandem,

138
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:41.879
<v Speaker 11>they didn't want to accord and for me as a

139
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:48.200
<v Speaker 11>research journalist, that gives credibility for their decision. They cried

140
00:08:48.519 --> 00:08:55.360
<v Speaker 11>when they voted to acquit. These are emotional reactions that jurors. Example,

141
00:08:55.399 --> 00:08:59.679
<v Speaker 11>in the OJ case, I speak to bar associations here

142
00:08:59.759 --> 00:09:05.600
<v Speaker 11>in order, and colleges and law schools, and I compare

143
00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:10.120
<v Speaker 11>the OJ case to the Casey Anthony case. And of

144
00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:16.000
<v Speaker 11>course my own opinion is that OJ was guilty and

145
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:20.399
<v Speaker 11>that the jury acquitted him despite the fact that they

146
00:09:21.159 --> 00:09:25.679
<v Speaker 11>the evidence in that case strongly suggested that he was guilty.

147
00:09:26.440 --> 00:09:29.159
<v Speaker 11>But the difference in terms of the jury is the

148
00:09:29.279 --> 00:09:34.679
<v Speaker 11>jury was very sympathetic to OJ. In fact, they invoked

149
00:09:34.759 --> 00:09:41.879
<v Speaker 11>something called jury nullification, which is a recognized legal authority

150
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:47.159
<v Speaker 11>that juries have in America to nullify a law by

151
00:09:47.720 --> 00:09:52.000
<v Speaker 11>trying the law and not the facts. Juries are finders

152
00:09:52.120 --> 00:09:56.000
<v Speaker 11>of fact, that's the way they're referred to, but they

153
00:09:56.039 --> 00:09:59.399
<v Speaker 11>can also be finders of law and reject a law.

154
00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:03.200
<v Speaker 11>That's a recognized right that goes back to Peter's anger

155
00:10:03.720 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 11>in Colonel America. And in the LJ case, that's what

156
00:10:08.840 --> 00:10:12.519
<v Speaker 11>they did. They rejected the law. But in the case

157
00:10:13.799 --> 00:10:14.840
<v Speaker 11>there was entirely different.

158
00:10:17.360 --> 00:10:19.279
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, I don't want to go too much

159
00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:22.639
<v Speaker 10>on a detour, but you have me at OJ. Okay,

160
00:10:22.759 --> 00:10:27.320
<v Speaker 10>So here's my analysis of the OJ Simpson case. And

161
00:10:27.519 --> 00:10:28.639
<v Speaker 10>we're just going to put it out there and we're

162
00:10:28.679 --> 00:10:30.039
<v Speaker 10>not going to spend too much time on this. But

163
00:10:30.159 --> 00:10:33.519
<v Speaker 10>this is the way I looked at This is hard, hard,

164
00:10:33.559 --> 00:10:35.159
<v Speaker 10>and long. I wish I would be looking at it

165
00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 10>right now instead of back in ninety three, ninety four

166
00:10:38.759 --> 00:10:41.279
<v Speaker 10>or whatever it was when it first happened. And then

167
00:10:41.320 --> 00:10:46.440
<v Speaker 10>the trial Robert Shapiro part of the dream team of

168
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:49.480
<v Speaker 10>ten lawyers at one hundred thousand dollars a month that

169
00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:53.039
<v Speaker 10>OJ was able to hire court and as well as

170
00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:56.559
<v Speaker 10>Henry Lee to sit on the forensic fence for the defense,

171
00:10:57.240 --> 00:10:59.360
<v Speaker 10>and that costs a lot of money as well, and

172
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:03.159
<v Speaker 10>a lot of anyway, a lot of discussion to be

173
00:11:03.200 --> 00:11:04.919
<v Speaker 10>able to get Henry Lee to be able to sort

174
00:11:04.919 --> 00:11:07.320
<v Speaker 10>of lean on the fence. And again, please let's not

175
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:10.879
<v Speaker 10>go down that detour talking about that. But ten lawyers

176
00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:17.320
<v Speaker 10>and Robert Shapiro quit during a trial because of what

177
00:11:17.519 --> 00:11:22.080
<v Speaker 10>Johnny Cochrane how he wanted to address the jury. And

178
00:11:22.200 --> 00:11:27.159
<v Speaker 10>according to my information, Shapiro quit, and this is pretty rare.

179
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:30.200
<v Speaker 10>He quit because he didn't like what Johnny Cochran was

180
00:11:30.240 --> 00:11:32.879
<v Speaker 10>going to do with the jurors. And he planned and

181
00:11:33.000 --> 00:11:37.639
<v Speaker 10>did say are you willing you black people in this

182
00:11:37.879 --> 00:11:40.720
<v Speaker 10>jury willing to go back into your black communities? Being

183
00:11:40.799 --> 00:11:44.600
<v Speaker 10>the person that handed this decision in this unfair racist

184
00:11:45.240 --> 00:11:50.559
<v Speaker 10>LA Police Department and with the Mark Furman and inadequate,

185
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:53.679
<v Speaker 10>I mean, how could you? How can you go toe

186
00:11:53.759 --> 00:11:56.960
<v Speaker 10>to toe with ten of the best defense lawyers in

187
00:11:57.000 --> 00:12:01.279
<v Speaker 10>America with expertise in every know That's the way I

188
00:12:01.360 --> 00:12:04.679
<v Speaker 10>looked at the O. J. Simpson case. Well, sure is

189
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:06.840
<v Speaker 10>just regular folks that have nothing better to do and

190
00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:09.480
<v Speaker 10>are silly enough to want to be on a juror

191
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:12.559
<v Speaker 10>a be a jur I think it's silly to go

192
00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:15.440
<v Speaker 10>through murder trials and have to see crime scene photos

193
00:12:15.480 --> 00:12:18.480
<v Speaker 10>and under the guys that you're doing something for your

194
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:22.720
<v Speaker 10>for your community or for your country. I mean, I

195
00:12:23.120 --> 00:12:26.240
<v Speaker 10>don't know anyway, sorry, but you had.

196
00:12:27.879 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 11>You have to invite me back and we can talk

197
00:12:30.120 --> 00:12:33.480
<v Speaker 11>about that, your your opinions that have provoked a lot

198
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:37.240
<v Speaker 11>of thoughts and and very interesting discussion for me. But

199
00:12:37.399 --> 00:12:38.960
<v Speaker 11>as you say, we don't want to do it tonight,

200
00:12:39.080 --> 00:12:41.039
<v Speaker 11>but a very interesting subject.

201
00:12:42.720 --> 00:12:46.679
<v Speaker 10>Now. The thing is with Casey Anthony, and I might

202
00:12:46.679 --> 00:12:49.639
<v Speaker 10>as well get this out there right now. What you

203
00:12:49.799 --> 00:12:54.000
<v Speaker 10>really start your your article with is that you know

204
00:12:54.080 --> 00:12:58.320
<v Speaker 10>there was a media circus, uh, you know, the irresponsible media,

205
00:12:58.399 --> 00:13:00.960
<v Speaker 10>and we can say name some names. Nancy Grace was

206
00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:06.639
<v Speaker 10>unbelievable during this, but there was other names as well. Again,

207
00:13:06.720 --> 00:13:09.279
<v Speaker 10>this is not really in dispute that the media. There

208
00:13:09.320 --> 00:13:12.960
<v Speaker 10>was some irresponsible members of the media rushing to judgment.

209
00:13:13.039 --> 00:13:15.320
<v Speaker 10>And what I wanted to say too is I had

210
00:13:16.120 --> 00:13:18.039
<v Speaker 10>and I guess I was part of that media circus too.

211
00:13:18.120 --> 00:13:22.000
<v Speaker 10>I had Diane Fanning on Saint Martin's Press, Mummy's Little

212
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:25.519
<v Speaker 10>Girl and the story of Casey Anthony prior to the trial.

213
00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:29.679
<v Speaker 10>And that was interesting to me because I had not

214
00:13:29.919 --> 00:13:34.799
<v Speaker 10>seen that, especially in a murder trial that was you know,

215
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:38.600
<v Speaker 10>upcoming soon, soon to come, and yet a book was

216
00:13:38.679 --> 00:13:41.480
<v Speaker 10>out prior to the trial, and then it was very

217
00:13:41.559 --> 00:13:47.200
<v Speaker 10>interesting tell us about that. What was your conversation with

218
00:13:47.519 --> 00:13:49.879
<v Speaker 10>Dan Fanning wrote the book, and so what was your

219
00:13:49.960 --> 00:13:52.120
<v Speaker 10>conversation with her, like what was the kind of things

220
00:13:52.159 --> 00:13:54.799
<v Speaker 10>that you had to discuss and tell us?

221
00:13:54.840 --> 00:13:59.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, it was a short discussion. I was, I told

222
00:13:59.039 --> 00:14:02.960
<v Speaker 11>her interested in the subject and my research and so forth,

223
00:14:03.639 --> 00:14:09.200
<v Speaker 11>and she basically just pointed out that she was writing

224
00:14:09.360 --> 00:14:13.000
<v Speaker 11>her story before the verdict came in and before all

225
00:14:13.039 --> 00:14:18.600
<v Speaker 11>the evidence was in, but she felt compelled to write

226
00:14:18.639 --> 00:14:21.399
<v Speaker 11>about the story because it was the center of attention

227
00:14:21.840 --> 00:14:29.360
<v Speaker 11>in America and certainly on TV. And she was you know, basically,

228
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:33.279
<v Speaker 11>she was not We didn't get into a lot of

229
00:14:33.360 --> 00:14:36.120
<v Speaker 11>discussion or conversation. It was just kind of a touch

230
00:14:36.200 --> 00:14:42.639
<v Speaker 11>base conversation two journalists that her think about the same subject.

231
00:14:43.679 --> 00:14:48.120
<v Speaker 10>Okay, Yeah, And I was surprised myself too to be

232
00:14:48.159 --> 00:14:50.519
<v Speaker 10>able to you know, have her back on and discuss

233
00:14:51.240 --> 00:14:54.720
<v Speaker 10>how she felt, you know, about writing a book and

234
00:14:54.799 --> 00:14:57.799
<v Speaker 10>then having this looking like a foregone conclusion and then

235
00:14:58.240 --> 00:15:02.000
<v Speaker 10>certainly not. The other thing that I have is that

236
00:15:02.200 --> 00:15:05.559
<v Speaker 10>if you say that in the court of public opinion,

237
00:15:06.039 --> 00:15:09.600
<v Speaker 10>Casey Anthony was you know, it was a rush to judgment,

238
00:15:09.679 --> 00:15:13.799
<v Speaker 10>obviously attacking her character, and it was everyone knows it

239
00:15:13.960 --> 00:15:19.039
<v Speaker 10>was a circus. But what are you saying about it

240
00:15:19.159 --> 00:15:22.919
<v Speaker 10>when you're saying about Casey Anthony's innocence? Why can't you

241
00:15:23.080 --> 00:15:25.919
<v Speaker 10>just why are you not content to just leave it there?

242
00:15:26.519 --> 00:15:30.320
<v Speaker 10>Why are you compelled to? And we won't get to

243
00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:32.480
<v Speaker 10>that point yet, but let's let's just talk about why

244
00:15:32.519 --> 00:15:35.440
<v Speaker 10>are you at least not just compelled to talk about

245
00:15:35.600 --> 00:15:40.240
<v Speaker 10>and analyze and dissect why Casey Anthony really you know,

246
00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:42.519
<v Speaker 10>of course she was acquitted by the juror why is

247
00:15:42.559 --> 00:15:46.279
<v Speaker 10>she not guilty? Right?

248
00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:52.480
<v Speaker 11>It's a you know, that's a fundamental pivotal question and

249
00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:56.240
<v Speaker 11>point about the whole subject, dan uh And and what

250
00:15:56.399 --> 00:16:03.440
<v Speaker 11>attracted me to the story, the one sided narrative of

251
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:06.759
<v Speaker 11>the subject as a journalist, and I kept looking for

252
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:14.320
<v Speaker 11>a journalist guideline, not a analyst guideline or commentator, but

253
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:18.480
<v Speaker 11>a journalist guideline. When you take a story subject, you

254
00:16:18.679 --> 00:16:22.080
<v Speaker 11>may be given marching orders by your editor to say, Okay,

255
00:16:22.120 --> 00:16:25.200
<v Speaker 11>here's the story. The evidence looks overwhelming against this person,

256
00:16:25.399 --> 00:16:27.679
<v Speaker 11>and we're going to cover this story, and we're going

257
00:16:27.759 --> 00:16:30.320
<v Speaker 11>to show this evidence in our article or in our piece.

258
00:16:31.519 --> 00:16:35.679
<v Speaker 11>But we also have to show the other side. Sometimes

259
00:16:35.679 --> 00:16:37.759
<v Speaker 11>it's towards the end of the article, and sometimes it's

260
00:16:38.080 --> 00:16:40.799
<v Speaker 11>a fraction of the space of the whole article. But

261
00:16:40.879 --> 00:16:46.559
<v Speaker 11>at least you hear as strong and as compelling a

262
00:16:46.799 --> 00:16:49.799
<v Speaker 11>presentation for the other side as you can muster, as

263
00:16:49.840 --> 00:16:52.200
<v Speaker 11>you can find as a journalist and as a reporter.

264
00:16:52.919 --> 00:16:55.960
<v Speaker 11>And I kept waiting to find that in some kind

265
00:16:56.039 --> 00:17:00.840
<v Speaker 11>of journalistic outlet, and it was never there. And so

266
00:17:01.879 --> 00:17:05.799
<v Speaker 11>I talked to Barry Suspen and he felt that it

267
00:17:05.920 --> 00:17:09.000
<v Speaker 11>was a media circus. But he said, look, he said,

268
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:14.000
<v Speaker 11>you can present me your story, but I'm going to

269
00:17:14.079 --> 00:17:16.920
<v Speaker 11>need strict sourcing, and you're going to have to convince

270
00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:21.079
<v Speaker 11>me before I publish it. The Nieman Foundation for Journalism

271
00:17:21.240 --> 00:17:27.079
<v Speaker 11>is a very respected, top of the line operation, and

272
00:17:27.720 --> 00:17:29.559
<v Speaker 11>they are not going to put anything out there that

273
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:35.359
<v Speaker 11>is strongly sourced, strictly sourced, and credible. And I accepted

274
00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:38.839
<v Speaker 11>that standard, and he was very happy to publish. And

275
00:17:39.039 --> 00:17:42.799
<v Speaker 11>so to answer your question, why don't I just leave

276
00:17:42.839 --> 00:17:45.599
<v Speaker 11>it by a statement for an argument that Casey Anthony

277
00:17:45.680 --> 00:17:49.000
<v Speaker 11>is innocent and let it go of that. There's much

278
00:17:49.039 --> 00:17:53.279
<v Speaker 11>more involved in this story, the media and the public.

279
00:17:53.799 --> 00:17:57.200
<v Speaker 11>And here again then you can recall the scenes at

280
00:17:57.200 --> 00:18:02.640
<v Speaker 11>the courthouse where jerked or fighting amongst themselves to get

281
00:18:02.680 --> 00:18:05.279
<v Speaker 11>in line so that they could be a witness to

282
00:18:05.519 --> 00:18:11.640
<v Speaker 11>what everybody understood and believed would be a execution decision,

283
00:18:12.279 --> 00:18:15.799
<v Speaker 11>or at least a guilty decision for this defendant. And

284
00:18:16.480 --> 00:18:20.319
<v Speaker 11>that's why I said in my piece that it resemble

285
00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:24.240
<v Speaker 11>the days of the Roman Colosseum. Well, that's not America.

286
00:18:24.880 --> 00:18:27.319
<v Speaker 11>That's not the America that I live in or want

287
00:18:27.359 --> 00:18:31.319
<v Speaker 11>to do it. And of course she was the object

288
00:18:31.559 --> 00:18:36.400
<v Speaker 11>of bullying, but everybody is so convinced because of her

289
00:18:36.519 --> 00:18:40.240
<v Speaker 11>behavior after the death of her daughter that she had

290
00:18:40.359 --> 00:18:47.200
<v Speaker 11>to be guilty. Nobody would the consensus is, and not

291
00:18:47.279 --> 00:18:52.440
<v Speaker 11>an unreasonable consensus, but the consensus is nobody could witness

292
00:18:52.759 --> 00:18:56.119
<v Speaker 11>or find the death of their two year old daughter

293
00:18:56.640 --> 00:19:00.960
<v Speaker 11>and then not report it. And she never reported it.

294
00:19:01.480 --> 00:19:05.799
<v Speaker 11>It wasn't her that that eventually determined that the child

295
00:19:05.839 --> 00:19:08.599
<v Speaker 11>that died. It was the body was found six months later,

296
00:19:09.759 --> 00:19:12.160
<v Speaker 11>and it wasn't her that reported the death to police.

297
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:15.440
<v Speaker 11>It was her mother. Police arrested her.

298
00:19:17.400 --> 00:19:19.680
<v Speaker 10>So let's you know what, let's let's not you know,

299
00:19:19.799 --> 00:19:22.000
<v Speaker 10>that's the thing is, let's not go too much into

300
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:24.559
<v Speaker 10>rehashing the evidence, because then we can have we can

301
00:19:24.680 --> 00:19:28.440
<v Speaker 10>have a fire firestorm here of well, that's not exactly

302
00:19:28.519 --> 00:19:30.839
<v Speaker 10>how I went down, and we can you know, retry

303
00:19:30.920 --> 00:19:34.440
<v Speaker 10>the case here to a certain degree. What I would

304
00:19:34.519 --> 00:19:39.039
<v Speaker 10>like to look at is and of course, again I'm

305
00:19:39.079 --> 00:19:42.759
<v Speaker 10>not trying to edit what you're trying to say here. Again,

306
00:19:42.839 --> 00:19:45.960
<v Speaker 10>I can agree that that everything that everybody that's listening

307
00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:50.200
<v Speaker 10>to this program witnessed for themselves as well, because it

308
00:19:50.319 --> 00:19:55.160
<v Speaker 10>dominated everything. Is that it now in hindsight or if

309
00:19:55.200 --> 00:20:00.319
<v Speaker 10>they were to look at it, say the next person

310
00:20:00.440 --> 00:20:02.799
<v Speaker 10>or the next person or the next person, because you know,

311
00:20:03.400 --> 00:20:06.240
<v Speaker 10>the judicial system of America sometimes gets it wrong. That

312
00:20:06.240 --> 00:20:08.599
<v Speaker 10>if you have this media circus and it's wrong now

313
00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:11.480
<v Speaker 10>people think that Casey Anthony is guilty and beat the

314
00:20:11.599 --> 00:20:15.480
<v Speaker 10>murder rap and the jury was silly and it was

315
00:20:15.559 --> 00:20:22.319
<v Speaker 10>nonsensical and the defense through you know, through conjecture, and

316
00:20:22.400 --> 00:20:24.400
<v Speaker 10>again that's a big word. And I can have the

317
00:20:24.480 --> 00:20:28.920
<v Speaker 10>definition of what conjecture is is that that the father, George,

318
00:20:29.640 --> 00:20:32.680
<v Speaker 10>was the killer. But again he hasn't been tried. He

319
00:20:33.160 --> 00:20:38.759
<v Speaker 10>was that Any and all involvement in this was investigated

320
00:20:38.799 --> 00:20:40.720
<v Speaker 10>by the police. There were no charges laid. There are

321
00:20:40.759 --> 00:20:43.400
<v Speaker 10>no there was no talk of charges to be laid.

322
00:20:43.880 --> 00:20:46.160
<v Speaker 10>The judge in the trial, the presiding judge in the trial,

323
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:48.839
<v Speaker 10>said he felt this is after the trial, that there

324
00:20:48.920 --> 00:20:53.640
<v Speaker 10>was ample evidence to convict Casey Anthony. There's been talking

325
00:20:53.680 --> 00:20:57.119
<v Speaker 10>of jurors not really paying attention to certain evidence, and

326
00:20:57.200 --> 00:21:00.240
<v Speaker 10>again that's just some kind of story because I I

327
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:02.279
<v Speaker 10>don't have that evidence. I don't have that.

328
00:21:04.400 --> 00:21:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Lucky Land casino, asking people what's the weirdest place you've

329
00:21:07.640 --> 00:21:08.319
<v Speaker 1>gotten lucky?

330
00:21:08.680 --> 00:21:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Lucky in line at the Delhi I guess ah, in

331
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>my dentist's office more than once.

332
00:21:13.559 --> 00:21:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Actually do I have to say?

333
00:21:15.359 --> 00:21:15.519
<v Speaker 11>Yes?

334
00:21:15.599 --> 00:21:15.759
<v Speaker 10>You do?

335
00:21:16.079 --> 00:21:18.519
<v Speaker 3>In the car before my kid's PTA meeting.

336
00:21:18.720 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Really yes, excuse me, what's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

337
00:21:22.319 --> 00:21:24.880
<v Speaker 4>I never win and tell well, there you have it.

338
00:21:24.960 --> 00:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You can get lucky anywhere playing at lucky landslots dot

339
00:21:27.839 --> 00:21:29.319
<v Speaker 1>com play for free right now?

340
00:21:29.640 --> 00:21:30.519
<v Speaker 4>Are you feeling lucky?

341
00:21:30.640 --> 00:21:32.079
<v Speaker 7>Nope, We're not necessary. Void Web were gonna be my

342
00:21:32.119 --> 00:21:33.640
<v Speaker 7>long eighteen plus terms and conditions of plus you what's

343
00:21:33.640 --> 00:21:34.160
<v Speaker 7>every days?

344
00:21:34.680 --> 00:21:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Wait, the Lucky land Slots. You can get lucky just

345
00:21:37.599 --> 00:21:38.400
<v Speaker 6>about anywhere.

346
00:21:39.319 --> 00:21:42.160
<v Speaker 5>It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the

347
00:21:42.240 --> 00:21:44.039
<v Speaker 5>weather's fine, but we're just going to circle up here

348
00:21:44.079 --> 00:21:47.119
<v Speaker 5>a while and get lucky. Oh no, nothing like that.

349
00:21:47.279 --> 00:21:49.599
<v Speaker 5>It's just these cash prizes add up quick. So I

350
00:21:49.720 --> 00:21:52.000
<v Speaker 5>suggest you sit back, keep your trade table up right,

351
00:21:52.079 --> 00:21:53.240
<v Speaker 5>and start getting lucky.

352
00:21:54.119 --> 00:21:56.880
<v Speaker 6>Play for free at Lucky Landslots dot com. Are you

353
00:21:57.079 --> 00:22:00.400
<v Speaker 6>feeling lucky? No purchase necessary, void where? But in my

354
00:22:00.519 --> 00:22:04.759
<v Speaker 6>law eighteen plus terms and conditions applying any website for details.

355
00:22:04.839 --> 00:22:07.559
<v Speaker 10>I don't know what kind of evidence that would be,

356
00:22:09.319 --> 00:22:14.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, overwhelming to me? So of that, so maybe

357
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:16.920
<v Speaker 10>I shouldn't even have said that. Let's discount I said

358
00:22:16.960 --> 00:22:21.720
<v Speaker 10>anything about the jury. Jury. But getting back to this

359
00:22:22.480 --> 00:22:25.000
<v Speaker 10>situation here, just because jurors.

360
00:22:24.759 --> 00:22:29.599
<v Speaker 11>I can add the Attorney General Pam Bondi that quote

361
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:31.960
<v Speaker 11>nobody there's nobody else in the world that could have

362
00:22:32.079 --> 00:22:35.920
<v Speaker 11>done this to Kayley except Casey Anthony. But she said

363
00:22:35.960 --> 00:22:37.279
<v Speaker 11>it before the trial even began.

364
00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:42.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, but that's called politics, isn't it. Because everybody's trying

365
00:22:42.039 --> 00:22:44.720
<v Speaker 10>to get elected and re elected and make political points.

366
00:22:44.759 --> 00:22:49.920
<v Speaker 10>Because so that's it's irresponsible. It's totally irresponsible, and it's

367
00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:54.559
<v Speaker 10>it's not a yeah, it's it's wrong. It's wrong for

368
00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:57.960
<v Speaker 10>people to but it is a good example in the

369
00:22:58.000 --> 00:23:02.839
<v Speaker 10>analysis is that I think people shouldn't judge people by

370
00:23:02.920 --> 00:23:07.440
<v Speaker 10>their posts say this behavior a couple of days later, necessarily,

371
00:23:07.640 --> 00:23:09.799
<v Speaker 10>But then again, this is the age that we are

372
00:23:09.960 --> 00:23:13.720
<v Speaker 10>in where there's video of almost everything, and you have

373
00:23:13.920 --> 00:23:16.880
<v Speaker 10>people like Nancy Grace who should know better, she's a

374
00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:22.480
<v Speaker 10>former prosecutor, and yet you know, television stations should be

375
00:23:22.559 --> 00:23:29.960
<v Speaker 10>more responsible. Publishing companies certainly don't, as per typical published

376
00:23:29.960 --> 00:23:34.319
<v Speaker 10>books before trials are finished, trying I mean, the only

377
00:23:34.400 --> 00:23:36.440
<v Speaker 10>reason you would do that is try to capitalize on

378
00:23:36.559 --> 00:23:41.920
<v Speaker 10>the momentum, capitalize on that furor by being the first right,

379
00:23:42.079 --> 00:23:45.359
<v Speaker 10>Isn't that What else other motivation would that be? Since

380
00:23:45.400 --> 00:23:46.000
<v Speaker 10>they don't do that.

381
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:50.079
<v Speaker 11>In the case of hl N, and that's the station

382
00:23:50.160 --> 00:23:53.319
<v Speaker 11>that Nancy Grace is on, they have, in my opinion,

383
00:23:53.720 --> 00:23:56.880
<v Speaker 11>a kind of a business model that has been very

384
00:23:56.960 --> 00:24:00.960
<v Speaker 11>successful for them, very lucrative for them. Business model is

385
00:24:01.119 --> 00:24:05.279
<v Speaker 11>pretty apparent to me and I don't say this because

386
00:24:05.319 --> 00:24:09.960
<v Speaker 11>I have any feeling because of the way they cover

387
00:24:10.160 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 11>this particular trial at all. I really don't, just as

388
00:24:13.400 --> 00:24:18.319
<v Speaker 11>an objective evaluator. Their business model is to find an

389
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:22.839
<v Speaker 11>accused that can attract national tension and then to bullieve

390
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:27.599
<v Speaker 11>the accused up one side and down the other, unrelated

391
00:24:29.039 --> 00:24:32.440
<v Speaker 11>and that's their business model, and it's very successful to

392
00:24:32.599 --> 00:24:37.319
<v Speaker 11>a certain audience. And for me, I only say that

393
00:24:37.599 --> 00:24:40.799
<v Speaker 11>just to acknowledge it and to be aware of it

394
00:24:40.960 --> 00:24:43.200
<v Speaker 11>so that when I Channel Surf and run by the station,

395
00:24:43.640 --> 00:24:46.759
<v Speaker 11>I just kind of understand that's what I'm going to see.

396
00:24:48.319 --> 00:24:53.279
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, our beloved corporation in Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

397
00:24:53.559 --> 00:24:55.640
<v Speaker 10>This is their side. This is the way they deal

398
00:24:55.759 --> 00:24:58.519
<v Speaker 10>with both sides of the story. They present their story

399
00:24:59.640 --> 00:25:04.480
<v Speaker 10>and then and they ask the opponent in this story,

400
00:25:04.599 --> 00:25:07.599
<v Speaker 10>the bad guy in this story, the subject or target

401
00:25:07.720 --> 00:25:11.160
<v Speaker 10>of their investigation or the documentary, if they'd like to

402
00:25:11.240 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 10>appear on camera, and they don't get any response, So

403
00:25:14.039 --> 00:25:15.880
<v Speaker 10>they show up at the office, or they show up

404
00:25:15.880 --> 00:25:17.279
<v Speaker 10>at his home, or they try to get him in

405
00:25:17.359 --> 00:25:21.559
<v Speaker 10>the parking lot running away from a cameraman and a

406
00:25:21.839 --> 00:25:27.519
<v Speaker 10>reporter with a microphone. You know the same thing. It's irresponsible, really,

407
00:25:28.359 --> 00:25:33.759
<v Speaker 10>But what I wanted to get to is that you

408
00:25:33.960 --> 00:25:37.720
<v Speaker 10>have accused somebody of murder other than Casey Anthy. You

409
00:25:37.759 --> 00:25:42.359
<v Speaker 10>said Casey Anthony. Is you believe Casey Anthony did not

410
00:25:42.640 --> 00:25:44.799
<v Speaker 10>commit this murder? So tell us I won't put words

411
00:25:44.839 --> 00:25:47.839
<v Speaker 10>in your mouth. Tell us what you believe about Casey

412
00:25:47.880 --> 00:25:53.039
<v Speaker 10>Anthony and her actual guilt. Let's guilt under you know,

413
00:25:53.160 --> 00:25:57.599
<v Speaker 10>a higher court will say, and who did do this murder?

414
00:25:58.160 --> 00:25:59.880
<v Speaker 10>And then well, I'll have some questions for.

415
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:06.000
<v Speaker 11>You, sure well as far as the acquitted defendant is concerned.

416
00:26:07.160 --> 00:26:13.000
<v Speaker 11>I approached the question and the subjects as a journalist,

417
00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:17.400
<v Speaker 11>as a research journalist, and I let the research and

418
00:26:17.519 --> 00:26:21.799
<v Speaker 11>the texts tell the story. And uh, in this case,

419
00:26:22.359 --> 00:26:25.079
<v Speaker 11>as we've already mentioned the fact that the jury jury

420
00:26:25.240 --> 00:26:30.759
<v Speaker 11>was unsympathetic to her, but they acquitted her as a

421
00:26:30.799 --> 00:26:36.119
<v Speaker 11>research journalist, that's a very powerful fact. If and I

422
00:26:36.160 --> 00:26:38.839
<v Speaker 11>only mentioned the old j jury just and you and

423
00:26:38.920 --> 00:26:41.720
<v Speaker 11>I agree on that. I think I only mentioned that

424
00:26:41.960 --> 00:26:45.559
<v Speaker 11>as a comparison somebody that the public believe is guilty

425
00:26:46.279 --> 00:26:48.759
<v Speaker 11>and the jury acquitted them. But in that case, the

426
00:26:48.839 --> 00:26:52.160
<v Speaker 11>jury was sympathetic to the defendant. In this case that

427
00:26:52.240 --> 00:26:55.519
<v Speaker 11>didn't exist. They didn't like her, they didn't want to.

428
00:26:57.599 --> 00:27:00.240
<v Speaker 10>But if they're using it as if you're using O. J.

429
00:27:00.359 --> 00:27:05.119
<v Speaker 10>Simpson as a litmus test, is an extraordinary case, and

430
00:27:05.200 --> 00:27:08.400
<v Speaker 10>the case of Anthony is an extraordinary case. But they

431
00:27:08.440 --> 00:27:11.240
<v Speaker 10>are not apples and apples. They're apples and something else.

432
00:27:12.680 --> 00:27:15.880
<v Speaker 10>Just because you know, you're you're drawing, you're taking, you're

433
00:27:15.920 --> 00:27:20.000
<v Speaker 10>making an inference because just because the jury, again you

434
00:27:20.240 --> 00:27:22.799
<v Speaker 10>say unanimous that they were unsympathetic, Well, why would they

435
00:27:22.880 --> 00:27:25.119
<v Speaker 10>be sympathetic to her? No one was. I mean, that's

436
00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:28.519
<v Speaker 10>so that's pretty easy. The odds are against twelve ordinary

437
00:27:28.559 --> 00:27:32.519
<v Speaker 10>people being sympathetic to her. She's in court accused of something,

438
00:27:32.599 --> 00:27:36.359
<v Speaker 10>so again sympathy, unsympathetic. But then you say, well they

439
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:38.880
<v Speaker 10>but they still acquitted her. Well, of course, because they've

440
00:27:38.880 --> 00:27:42.680
<v Speaker 10>been instructed or the prosecution was ineffective, or the defense

441
00:27:43.359 --> 00:27:46.920
<v Speaker 10>was effective, and the defense could have been effective. In

442
00:27:47.680 --> 00:27:49.799
<v Speaker 10>the conjecture, I mean, it happens.

443
00:27:50.680 --> 00:27:54.039
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, And as a as a as a researcher, what

444
00:27:54.400 --> 00:27:58.680
<v Speaker 11>what impressed me about that fact, that single fact was

445
00:27:59.799 --> 00:28:04.680
<v Speaker 11>was was that the jury felt compelled to follow the

446
00:28:06.200 --> 00:28:09.119
<v Speaker 11>judges instructions, and the instructions of the law as it's

447
00:28:09.160 --> 00:28:13.359
<v Speaker 11>written and come up with a decision based on the law,

448
00:28:13.680 --> 00:28:19.759
<v Speaker 11>and that the jury was the jury decision, and the

449
00:28:19.880 --> 00:28:27.240
<v Speaker 11>jurors themselves represented a tremendous achievement for American justice in

450
00:28:27.359 --> 00:28:30.799
<v Speaker 11>and of itself, just that fact, the fact that they could,

451
00:28:30.920 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 11>in the face of huge hostile a huge hostile environment

452
00:28:36.920 --> 00:28:41.000
<v Speaker 11>against the defendant, could stand up and say, I'm sorry.

453
00:28:42.200 --> 00:28:46.039
<v Speaker 11>The law says, if there's a reasonable doubt, I must acquit.

454
00:28:47.079 --> 00:28:50.079
<v Speaker 11>And that's exactly what they did. And then they went

455
00:28:50.119 --> 00:28:54.599
<v Speaker 11>into hiding to protect themselves from the hostility of some

456
00:28:54.920 --> 00:28:58.119
<v Speaker 11>members of the public at their decision. So, as a

457
00:28:58.160 --> 00:29:04.359
<v Speaker 11>research journalist, what impresses me is irony in truth. Truth

458
00:29:04.480 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 11>is stranger than fiction. You couldn't write a story like

459
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:11.839
<v Speaker 11>this and have anybody to believe it at all possible

460
00:29:12.680 --> 00:29:17.400
<v Speaker 11>that these twelve girds could be subjected to the hostility

461
00:29:17.559 --> 00:29:22.200
<v Speaker 11>and the probrium of their culture. And yet when you

462
00:29:22.240 --> 00:29:26.319
<v Speaker 11>look at the facts of it, understand they upheld the

463
00:29:26.400 --> 00:29:30.640
<v Speaker 11>law that ultimately protects each of us as an individual

464
00:29:30.759 --> 00:29:34.720
<v Speaker 11>in this country. How impressive is that and how.

465
00:29:34.799 --> 00:29:37.279
<v Speaker 10>Well it is? You know, I'm not impressed. I'm not

466
00:29:37.359 --> 00:29:40.599
<v Speaker 10>impressed with the system we'll say again example, I wasn't

467
00:29:40.599 --> 00:29:44.319
<v Speaker 10>impressed with the judicial system in the decision, the O. J.

468
00:29:44.519 --> 00:29:48.680
<v Speaker 10>Simpson decision, I wasn't just And so there are I mean,

469
00:29:48.720 --> 00:29:51.720
<v Speaker 10>I probably could name a few decisions that I wasn't

470
00:29:52.880 --> 00:29:55.960
<v Speaker 10>I wasn't happy with, and I didn't agree with. So

471
00:29:56.480 --> 00:30:00.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's that's just the way, that's just the

472
00:30:00.279 --> 00:30:03.200
<v Speaker 10>way things are. But I can't see how you know,

473
00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:07.240
<v Speaker 10>they could have been presented a not enough conclusive evidence,

474
00:30:07.279 --> 00:30:10.279
<v Speaker 10>and that's a reasonable doubt as well. I mean, and

475
00:30:10.400 --> 00:30:12.880
<v Speaker 10>it all it takes is one juror, and so.

476
00:30:14.799 --> 00:30:17.599
<v Speaker 11>Well, the cow was eight to four and the first

477
00:30:17.720 --> 00:30:23.400
<v Speaker 11>vote to equip and eurie watchers and trial consultants and

478
00:30:24.880 --> 00:30:27.000
<v Speaker 11>people who follow the courts will tell you that that

479
00:30:27.279 --> 00:30:31.640
<v Speaker 11>is a pretty strong vote on an initial vote, especially

480
00:30:31.720 --> 00:30:34.640
<v Speaker 11>on a murder trial like this that attracted so much attention.

481
00:30:35.559 --> 00:30:42.319
<v Speaker 11>And the ultimate decision was unanimous, and as I said,

482
00:30:42.359 --> 00:30:45.359
<v Speaker 11>it was not out of sympathy to the dependent. And

483
00:30:45.680 --> 00:30:49.559
<v Speaker 11>the other thing about the researching in this case. It

484
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:53.039
<v Speaker 11>may surprise you, but I read the testimony of all

485
00:30:53.119 --> 00:30:57.119
<v Speaker 11>of the friends associates, and I should say the interviews

486
00:30:57.160 --> 00:31:03.480
<v Speaker 11>as well as the testimony with police, all of her friends, associates, colleagues,

487
00:31:03.759 --> 00:31:06.720
<v Speaker 11>people that she went to school with. Anybody and everybody

488
00:31:06.799 --> 00:31:10.880
<v Speaker 11>that was around her when both before her child was

489
00:31:10.920 --> 00:31:15.319
<v Speaker 11>born and after when she was raising Kayley, and the

490
00:31:15.680 --> 00:31:20.640
<v Speaker 11>police interviewers would bait them. They were trying to say, Okay,

491
00:31:21.079 --> 00:31:24.240
<v Speaker 11>she was not a good mother, she slapped Kaylie, right,

492
00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:28.839
<v Speaker 11>or she was abusive, or she was neglectable. Right, you know,

493
00:31:29.039 --> 00:31:32.519
<v Speaker 11>kind of almost leaning in saying right. And what do

494
00:31:32.599 --> 00:31:35.880
<v Speaker 11>you suppose all these people said in an environment where

495
00:31:35.920 --> 00:31:39.799
<v Speaker 11>nobody wanted to be associated with defending her, and what

496
00:31:39.920 --> 00:31:41.599
<v Speaker 11>every one of them said was that she was an

497
00:31:41.640 --> 00:31:48.400
<v Speaker 11>ideal mother with no exception. Okay, they went into they

498
00:31:48.440 --> 00:31:49.319
<v Speaker 11>went into detail.

499
00:31:50.119 --> 00:31:51.960
<v Speaker 10>They was that's fine, But you know the thing is

500
00:31:52.039 --> 00:31:54.759
<v Speaker 10>that's this that's a character. You know, somebody's summing up

501
00:31:54.839 --> 00:31:57.640
<v Speaker 10>someone's character and by their estimation and friends, and I

502
00:31:57.759 --> 00:32:00.000
<v Speaker 10>have lots of friends. You have friends and acquaintances and people.

503
00:32:00.880 --> 00:32:03.960
<v Speaker 10>I'd hate to see what people would say under those circumstances.

504
00:32:04.039 --> 00:32:06.640
<v Speaker 10>I see that the strongest evidence, like you say, is

505
00:32:06.680 --> 00:32:12.200
<v Speaker 10>the jury with all that hostility, thinking of the consequences

506
00:32:12.319 --> 00:32:15.839
<v Speaker 10>of their decision and then what they might have to do,

507
00:32:16.000 --> 00:32:20.400
<v Speaker 10>like going into seclusion and being hated and so yeah,

508
00:32:20.480 --> 00:32:24.279
<v Speaker 10>that that's evidence because that makes logical sense that people

509
00:32:24.359 --> 00:32:29.319
<v Speaker 10>would take in their own safety into consideration in their decision,

510
00:32:29.359 --> 00:32:33.200
<v Speaker 10>whether they wanted to or not. Biases natural and self

511
00:32:33.279 --> 00:32:37.200
<v Speaker 10>and survival is natural, and the other you know that.

512
00:32:37.359 --> 00:32:42.359
<v Speaker 10>The the other thing is that the the the jurors

513
00:32:42.400 --> 00:32:47.839
<v Speaker 10>as well listen to the information and made their major

514
00:32:47.880 --> 00:32:55.119
<v Speaker 10>decision under the judge's directions. So they but they still

515
00:32:55.160 --> 00:32:59.640
<v Speaker 10>have to be that is evidence in itself. Please make

516
00:32:59.680 --> 00:33:01.799
<v Speaker 10>another because I have to come back with this train

517
00:33:01.839 --> 00:33:04.839
<v Speaker 10>of thought here gather my thought here, Well I.

518
00:33:04.880 --> 00:33:08.559
<v Speaker 11>Can I can add this and the way my storylined

519
00:33:08.759 --> 00:33:13.119
<v Speaker 11>uples that confirms her innocence and one of the kind

520
00:33:13.119 --> 00:33:16.519
<v Speaker 11>of the pivot points of this information I just said

521
00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:20.119
<v Speaker 11>about all her friends, everybody, and they were vouching for her.

522
00:33:21.440 --> 00:33:25.720
<v Speaker 11>But the thing of it is what people what changed

523
00:33:25.759 --> 00:33:29.319
<v Speaker 11>people's minds about the innocence or guilts of the defendant

524
00:33:29.799 --> 00:33:35.319
<v Speaker 11>was her behavior after her daughter died. And as a researcher,

525
00:33:35.519 --> 00:33:38.039
<v Speaker 11>that is important to me, that's important thing to know.

526
00:33:38.279 --> 00:33:42.480
<v Speaker 11>That's the kind of a point of departure. And so

527
00:33:42.799 --> 00:33:45.880
<v Speaker 11>they also talked to her character as a person independent

528
00:33:46.000 --> 00:33:49.000
<v Speaker 11>of any descriptions of her as a mother, and they

529
00:33:49.039 --> 00:33:52.240
<v Speaker 11>said that she was everybody's mom. She would tell she

530
00:33:52.279 --> 00:33:54.599
<v Speaker 11>would take care of people, she would when she was

531
00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:57.200
<v Speaker 11>around them. She was that kind of a person. She

532
00:33:57.400 --> 00:33:59.200
<v Speaker 11>was not a narcissistic person.

533
00:34:00.200 --> 00:34:02.000
<v Speaker 10>See that's what I was talking about. Though, you know,

534
00:34:02.119 --> 00:34:05.759
<v Speaker 10>we can make these you know, she wasn't a narcissistic person. Again,

535
00:34:05.799 --> 00:34:10.960
<v Speaker 10>we get into you know, sofa of psychiatry here, you know,

536
00:34:11.119 --> 00:34:17.840
<v Speaker 10>couch psychiatry, home psychiatry. These friends and their testimony is valuable,

537
00:34:19.039 --> 00:34:22.440
<v Speaker 10>but it's not really as strong as the other evidence

538
00:34:22.480 --> 00:34:26.360
<v Speaker 10>that used to convict her or to acquit her. And

539
00:34:26.480 --> 00:34:29.320
<v Speaker 10>the thing is is that the friend, how many serial

540
00:34:29.440 --> 00:34:33.239
<v Speaker 10>killers are married and their wife has no idea of

541
00:34:33.360 --> 00:34:37.079
<v Speaker 10>the horror that this guy's perpetrating on the nation, their

542
00:34:37.159 --> 00:34:39.519
<v Speaker 10>eight bodies or ten victims or whatever it is. So

543
00:34:40.079 --> 00:34:43.239
<v Speaker 10>in and itself, you know that the friend says that

544
00:34:43.360 --> 00:34:45.679
<v Speaker 10>she's a great mom. That's fine. Maybe she was a

545
00:34:45.719 --> 00:34:49.440
<v Speaker 10>great mom till that one week or that incident, whatever

546
00:34:49.559 --> 00:34:51.360
<v Speaker 10>that is, or that one month. A lot of people

547
00:34:51.760 --> 00:34:55.360
<v Speaker 10>take a sharp departure from their normal typical behavior after

548
00:34:55.480 --> 00:34:58.360
<v Speaker 10>thirty years, twenty years, fifty years, many years.

549
00:34:58.960 --> 00:34:59.800
<v Speaker 11>So let's the point.

550
00:35:00.159 --> 00:35:02.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean, because we only have so much time. Let's

551
00:35:02.039 --> 00:35:06.960
<v Speaker 10>concentrate on the evidence that you have. You know, I

552
00:35:07.079 --> 00:35:10.360
<v Speaker 10>know that the defense put forward the same argument that

553
00:35:11.159 --> 00:35:14.559
<v Speaker 10>George and the drowning. But I want to hear actual evidence.

554
00:35:15.079 --> 00:35:18.639
<v Speaker 10>I want to hear strong evidence. And let's discuss that,

555
00:35:18.760 --> 00:35:21.320
<v Speaker 10>because that would take two hours. So let's talk about

556
00:35:21.360 --> 00:35:25.679
<v Speaker 10>the strong evidence. You are accusing a man. You say, listen,

557
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:31.039
<v Speaker 10>the court of public opinion crucified this woman, and now

558
00:35:31.079 --> 00:35:32.320
<v Speaker 10>what are they going to do? And she's still in

559
00:35:32.440 --> 00:35:35.840
<v Speaker 10>hiding and she's still reviled. But aren't both of us

560
00:35:35.960 --> 00:35:37.440
<v Speaker 10>doing this? And that's why I'm giving you a rough

561
00:35:37.519 --> 00:35:39.920
<v Speaker 10>ride on this one. Aren't we both doing this? And

562
00:35:40.079 --> 00:35:43.199
<v Speaker 10>aren't you in accusing George of a murder? He's not

563
00:35:43.320 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 10>been charged, he was investigated. Like I said before, I mean,

564
00:35:48.480 --> 00:35:50.559
<v Speaker 10>aren't we doing the same thing. What if the show

565
00:35:50.639 --> 00:35:53.239
<v Speaker 10>takes off and four hundred thousand people listen to this

566
00:35:53.320 --> 00:35:56.960
<v Speaker 10>program and go, oh, well, shouldn't we retry George? Shouldn't

567
00:35:56.960 --> 00:36:01.000
<v Speaker 10>there be another retrial, shouldn't George be prosecuted? Shouldn't we

568
00:36:01.079 --> 00:36:02.320
<v Speaker 10>go hunt down George?

569
00:36:03.559 --> 00:36:06.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? And they as far as George, which is our father,

570
00:36:07.000 --> 00:36:12.360
<v Speaker 11>is concerned, I don't assert in the book that he

571
00:36:12.599 --> 00:36:17.519
<v Speaker 11>murdered Kayley. What I assert that he is responsible for

572
00:36:19.880 --> 00:36:24.000
<v Speaker 11>taking Kayley, putting her in a double laundry bag, and

573
00:36:24.280 --> 00:36:26.920
<v Speaker 11>placing her in the woods where she was later found

574
00:36:27.000 --> 00:36:33.800
<v Speaker 11>six months later. And also I know that there is

575
00:36:33.920 --> 00:36:39.400
<v Speaker 11>suspicion that and here I use the words suspicions that

576
00:36:39.960 --> 00:36:46.960
<v Speaker 11>George had a motive for negative feelings toward Kayley and

577
00:36:47.159 --> 00:36:52.519
<v Speaker 11>possibly killing her. And what do you suppose that that

578
00:36:52.760 --> 00:36:57.840
<v Speaker 11>suspicion is all about? It goes back to the relationship

579
00:36:58.000 --> 00:37:02.800
<v Speaker 11>in this family, which been commented about even by people

580
00:37:02.880 --> 00:37:07.159
<v Speaker 11>that don't like the defendant, as a very dysfunctional family,

581
00:37:08.239 --> 00:37:08.960
<v Speaker 11>very odd.

582
00:37:08.840 --> 00:37:12.079
<v Speaker 10>Family in terms of their Yeah, yeah, yeah, but you

583
00:37:12.159 --> 00:37:17.400
<v Speaker 10>know the thing is, dysfunctionality is more commonplace than not commonplace,

584
00:37:17.519 --> 00:37:21.039
<v Speaker 10>I mean. And besides, what does even dysfunction mean? Anything

585
00:37:21.079 --> 00:37:24.079
<v Speaker 10>out of the ordinary, anything out of perfection, which doesn't occur.

586
00:37:25.039 --> 00:37:28.119
<v Speaker 10>Let's just see what, you know. I want to know

587
00:37:28.239 --> 00:37:33.239
<v Speaker 10>what exactly the evidence is that of his involvement, That's

588
00:37:33.280 --> 00:37:37.960
<v Speaker 10>the thing. And if right, I want to hear the evidence.

589
00:37:37.639 --> 00:37:43.159
<v Speaker 11>Of that, sure, absolutely, obviously it's germane to the whole subject.

590
00:37:43.920 --> 00:37:48.800
<v Speaker 11>And of course, the manner in which the body was

591
00:37:48.880 --> 00:37:53.360
<v Speaker 11>found in there woods, just walk or so away from

592
00:37:54.159 --> 00:37:59.000
<v Speaker 11>his home, was wrapped in bags. The bags were tied.

593
00:37:58.920 --> 00:37:59.679
<v Speaker 10>With duct tape.

594
00:38:00.719 --> 00:38:05.599
<v Speaker 11>And it so happens that George was the one that

595
00:38:05.760 --> 00:38:10.559
<v Speaker 11>buried family pets and double plastic bags taped at the

596
00:38:10.639 --> 00:38:15.400
<v Speaker 11>top the duck bates in their family history. But this

597
00:38:15.639 --> 00:38:19.760
<v Speaker 11>was a method of disposing of bodies, in this case

598
00:38:19.840 --> 00:38:25.639
<v Speaker 11>pets that George preferred and that George used in the past,

599
00:38:26.880 --> 00:38:31.119
<v Speaker 11>and this is the way the little girl was found

600
00:38:32.039 --> 00:38:36.039
<v Speaker 11>not far from his home. So there is a connection

601
00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:41.280
<v Speaker 11>there between the discovery of the body and George. And

602
00:38:41.440 --> 00:38:50.400
<v Speaker 11>of course there is incontrovertible evidence at trial that George

603
00:38:50.519 --> 00:38:55.039
<v Speaker 11>lied on the stand about his activities while Kaylee was missing.

604
00:38:56.519 --> 00:39:01.440
<v Speaker 11>For example, he had a mistress while Kaylee was still missing,

605
00:39:02.199 --> 00:39:06.039
<v Speaker 11>and the whole country was looking for Kaylee around Forda anyway,

606
00:39:06.840 --> 00:39:09.119
<v Speaker 11>and everybody was concerned about her. He was having a

607
00:39:09.199 --> 00:39:12.000
<v Speaker 11>play with a mistress, and when he was asked about

608
00:39:12.000 --> 00:39:15.039
<v Speaker 11>it at trial, he lied. And the reason we know

609
00:39:15.159 --> 00:39:18.679
<v Speaker 11>he lied was because there was evidence presented that there

610
00:39:18.800 --> 00:39:21.760
<v Speaker 11>was a guard gate at the mistress's place that recognized him,

611
00:39:21.800 --> 00:39:25.079
<v Speaker 11>that logged him in multiple times, which he denied. There

612
00:39:25.159 --> 00:39:28.639
<v Speaker 11>was a cell phone text of amorous comments between him

613
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:33.000
<v Speaker 11>and the mistress. And what's more interesting, the mistress says

614
00:39:33.159 --> 00:39:37.599
<v Speaker 11>that he in effect confessed to her before Kaylee was found,

615
00:39:38.760 --> 00:39:41.119
<v Speaker 11>that Kaylee died and that he knew how she died.

616
00:39:43.039 --> 00:39:44.199
<v Speaker 10>So this is what what?

617
00:39:44.360 --> 00:39:44.400
<v Speaker 2>What?

618
00:39:44.559 --> 00:39:47.760
<v Speaker 10>What? What? Okay? This this is this is some news

619
00:39:47.840 --> 00:39:51.880
<v Speaker 10>for me. What did police do with this? Where when

620
00:39:51.960 --> 00:39:55.000
<v Speaker 10>did this come out? And why was this evidence? Tell

621
00:39:55.079 --> 00:39:57.800
<v Speaker 10>us about this evidence? In terms of this, mistress said

622
00:39:58.159 --> 00:40:02.760
<v Speaker 10>what to who? Who's who? Is this? This confession story

623
00:40:03.239 --> 00:40:03.679
<v Speaker 10>given to.

624
00:40:05.679 --> 00:40:08.159
<v Speaker 11>Well, I was given to the mistress and she testified

625
00:40:08.239 --> 00:40:15.079
<v Speaker 11>to it at trial, okay. And the statement was that

626
00:40:15.360 --> 00:40:19.320
<v Speaker 11>Kayley died in an accident that snowballed out of control.

627
00:40:19.480 --> 00:40:24.400
<v Speaker 11>Is what he told her. And of course this is

628
00:40:25.400 --> 00:40:27.400
<v Speaker 11>you can put this in the context of a man

629
00:40:28.000 --> 00:40:30.480
<v Speaker 11>whose daughter is on trial and who's he He is

630
00:40:30.599 --> 00:40:35.079
<v Speaker 11>testifying against her capital murder and he's lying on the sand,

631
00:40:35.719 --> 00:40:38.519
<v Speaker 11>not just about his statement to his mistress, but the

632
00:40:38.599 --> 00:40:44.280
<v Speaker 11>fact that she was even even was his mistress. And

633
00:40:45.360 --> 00:40:47.599
<v Speaker 11>so you have to ask yourself at some point in time,

634
00:40:48.199 --> 00:40:52.840
<v Speaker 11>why would he do that? Why would he lie about

635
00:40:52.920 --> 00:40:57.000
<v Speaker 11>having a mistress when the effect was to was to

636
00:40:57.480 --> 00:41:01.679
<v Speaker 11>incriminate his daughter? Whose face the death ped I mean,

637
00:41:02.079 --> 00:41:06.000
<v Speaker 11>let's face it, if he admitted to having a mistress,

638
00:41:07.599 --> 00:41:10.199
<v Speaker 11>that's not the end of the world for him. Why

639
00:41:10.239 --> 00:41:13.960
<v Speaker 11>would he do that? Why would he uh, why would

640
00:41:14.000 --> 00:41:14.719
<v Speaker 11>he lie about it?

641
00:41:17.519 --> 00:41:19.280
<v Speaker 10>You know? The thing is if you, if you, if

642
00:41:19.320 --> 00:41:21.079
<v Speaker 10>you have to say why did he do this? And

643
00:41:21.199 --> 00:41:25.280
<v Speaker 10>then and then make a supposition or a proposition that

644
00:41:25.679 --> 00:41:30.000
<v Speaker 10>that this is why he did that, then again that's unfair.

645
00:41:30.239 --> 00:41:32.599
<v Speaker 10>In it's you can call it a lot of things.

646
00:41:32.639 --> 00:41:34.119
<v Speaker 10>You can call it conjecture, you can call it.

647
00:41:35.039 --> 00:41:39.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, well, it's just that for me, Well, okay,

648
00:41:39.880 --> 00:41:42.400
<v Speaker 11>it's a it's an open question that I'm asking. And

649
00:41:42.519 --> 00:41:45.440
<v Speaker 11>the reason I'm asking it that way, I'm not asserting

650
00:41:46.239 --> 00:41:49.800
<v Speaker 11>that he murdered anybody. But I am trying to present

651
00:41:49.960 --> 00:41:54.440
<v Speaker 11>a balanced narrative. I'm trying to present a balance narrative,

652
00:41:55.119 --> 00:41:57.159
<v Speaker 11>the one side of narrative of his story.

653
00:41:58.639 --> 00:42:01.320
<v Speaker 10>Tell me about the tell him, tell us about the mistress. Though,

654
00:42:01.519 --> 00:42:04.840
<v Speaker 10>what if this is if this is well, this could

655
00:42:04.920 --> 00:42:08.400
<v Speaker 10>be crucial evidence. This testimony here.

656
00:42:08.639 --> 00:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Lucky land Casino asking people, what's the weirdest place you've

657
00:42:11.880 --> 00:42:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten Lucky.

658
00:42:12.920 --> 00:42:15.599
<v Speaker 2>Lucky in line at the Delhi I guess ah, in

659
00:42:15.719 --> 00:42:17.679
<v Speaker 2>my dentist's office more than once.

660
00:42:17.760 --> 00:42:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Actually, do I have to say?

661
00:42:19.559 --> 00:42:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

662
00:42:19.840 --> 00:42:22.719
<v Speaker 3>You do in the car before my kid's PTA meeting?

663
00:42:22.960 --> 00:42:23.719
<v Speaker 5>Really? Yes?

664
00:42:24.119 --> 00:42:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Excuse me? What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

665
00:42:26.559 --> 00:42:27.599
<v Speaker 6>I never win?

666
00:42:27.719 --> 00:42:29.119
<v Speaker 4>And tell well, there you have it.

667
00:42:29.199 --> 00:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You could get lucky anywhere playing at lucky landslots dot

668
00:42:32.039 --> 00:42:33.519
<v Speaker 1>com play for free right now?

669
00:42:33.840 --> 00:42:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Are you feeling lucky?

670
00:42:34.880 --> 00:42:37.400
<v Speaker 7>No, we're not necessary for my long eighteen plus terms conditions.

671
00:42:37.440 --> 00:42:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Plus what every to get here.

672
00:42:39.159 --> 00:42:42.440
<v Speaker 10>That you know was an accident got out of control? Again,

673
00:42:42.639 --> 00:42:45.719
<v Speaker 10>if you ask the question, why would this mistress make

674
00:42:45.880 --> 00:42:49.679
<v Speaker 10>up a story like that that you know, on the

675
00:42:49.719 --> 00:42:52.199
<v Speaker 10>face of it seems kind of feasible and doesn't sound

676
00:42:52.320 --> 00:42:58.440
<v Speaker 10>like a fantastic opportunistic story. Again, tell us about the

677
00:42:58.639 --> 00:43:01.280
<v Speaker 10>actual trial and what did they do with her as

678
00:43:01.440 --> 00:43:04.480
<v Speaker 10>testimony and the cross examine and direct vote. What was

679
00:43:04.519 --> 00:43:06.679
<v Speaker 10>the result of this? Why is it? Why was this

680
00:43:06.840 --> 00:43:07.760
<v Speaker 10>not more important?

681
00:43:08.719 --> 00:43:12.079
<v Speaker 11>Well? That's you know, that's the backstory Dan, about this,

682
00:43:12.760 --> 00:43:18.840
<v Speaker 11>about how this whole story has been a one sided

683
00:43:18.960 --> 00:43:23.719
<v Speaker 11>narrative on the part of everyone involved in it practically

684
00:43:24.320 --> 00:43:28.039
<v Speaker 11>except her defense team, and that is the police. It's

685
00:43:28.079 --> 00:43:30.719
<v Speaker 11>not a surprise to people at follow crime story is

686
00:43:30.800 --> 00:43:37.519
<v Speaker 11>that when a high profile or celebrity involved crime is committed,

687
00:43:37.760 --> 00:43:41.480
<v Speaker 11>they want to find a solution. They need somebody to prosecute.

688
00:43:42.239 --> 00:43:46.360
<v Speaker 11>The prosecutor. A lot of them are elected, a lot

689
00:43:46.440 --> 00:43:49.960
<v Speaker 11>of them use those cases. I won't mention Jeff Ashton's

690
00:43:50.039 --> 00:43:53.599
<v Speaker 11>name as the stepping stones a higher political office, and

691
00:43:55.159 --> 00:43:58.679
<v Speaker 11>I think that's actually what he did in Orange County, Florida.

692
00:43:59.159 --> 00:44:03.199
<v Speaker 11>But I'm just saying that you go after a suspect,

693
00:44:03.440 --> 00:44:08.920
<v Speaker 11>and you tried what the prosecutor does. He's obligated to look,

694
00:44:09.280 --> 00:44:12.199
<v Speaker 11>to seek and to obtain justice. But the way the

695
00:44:12.239 --> 00:44:15.639
<v Speaker 11>system works, too often, he said, they look for somebody

696
00:44:16.519 --> 00:44:22.480
<v Speaker 11>to convict, and they look for leverage to use against

697
00:44:22.519 --> 00:44:27.440
<v Speaker 11>that person to gain a conviction by a jury of peers.

698
00:44:28.199 --> 00:44:32.000
<v Speaker 11>And sometimes that means you just zero in on one

699
00:44:32.079 --> 00:44:36.719
<v Speaker 11>person who looks like a ripe vulnerable target and ignore

700
00:44:36.800 --> 00:44:42.599
<v Speaker 11>the other people in the case. Perhaps George, that should

701
00:44:42.639 --> 00:44:47.880
<v Speaker 11>be investigated. You said on several times George was investigated,

702
00:44:48.039 --> 00:44:50.400
<v Speaker 11>or maybe he wasn't. Well, the truth is he wasn't.

703
00:44:51.519 --> 00:44:56.000
<v Speaker 11>I watched the videotaped interrogations. I watched, I read the transcripts.

704
00:44:56.480 --> 00:44:58.880
<v Speaker 11>He was given a pass. He won't.

705
00:45:00.280 --> 00:45:02.840
<v Speaker 10>Let me ask it. Let me ask this question though

706
00:45:03.199 --> 00:45:09.119
<v Speaker 10>the whole story starts. You know, again, explain this to

707
00:45:09.199 --> 00:45:12.719
<v Speaker 10>me then, But we're giving this this your logic on

708
00:45:12.840 --> 00:45:19.880
<v Speaker 10>this story. Here, Casey Anthony is not at her family's home,

709
00:45:20.920 --> 00:45:24.880
<v Speaker 10>she's somewhere else. There's the car at the impound and

710
00:45:25.079 --> 00:45:28.119
<v Speaker 10>the parents get a call, and then there's the smell

711
00:45:28.159 --> 00:45:32.239
<v Speaker 10>of death. Didn't he confirm that smell of death even

712
00:45:32.280 --> 00:45:34.760
<v Speaker 10>though the mother was the first person to give us that.

713
00:45:35.000 --> 00:45:38.440
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I don't understand how. Again, you don't have

714
00:45:38.519 --> 00:45:39.960
<v Speaker 10>to give me a motive, but you got to give

715
00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:44.239
<v Speaker 10>me how this makes logical sense when it started. Explain

716
00:45:44.320 --> 00:45:44.719
<v Speaker 10>this for me.

717
00:45:45.519 --> 00:45:48.800
<v Speaker 11>Sure, absolutely, the smell of death was in the trunk

718
00:45:48.880 --> 00:45:53.480
<v Speaker 11>of Casey's car. Sure, and that was discovered. That was

719
00:45:53.559 --> 00:45:58.360
<v Speaker 11>identified about two and a half weeks after the day

720
00:45:58.440 --> 00:45:59.960
<v Speaker 11>we know that Katie died.

721
00:46:00.920 --> 00:46:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Well.

722
00:46:01.360 --> 00:46:04.159
<v Speaker 11>As it turns out, incidentally, Henry Lee was one of

723
00:46:04.280 --> 00:46:08.840
<v Speaker 11>forensic examiner, is very prominent forensic scientist who was on

724
00:46:08.920 --> 00:46:11.079
<v Speaker 11>the OJ case. He's also on this case for the

725
00:46:11.119 --> 00:46:15.400
<v Speaker 11>dependent and his conclusion was that there was no human

726
00:46:15.480 --> 00:46:18.519
<v Speaker 11>decomposition in the trunk of the car after he examined

727
00:46:18.559 --> 00:46:21.719
<v Speaker 11>the trunk. So I just throw that in as a

728
00:46:22.000 --> 00:46:27.280
<v Speaker 11>as a as a reference point, human decomposition is very

729
00:46:27.320 --> 00:46:31.760
<v Speaker 11>difficult to distinguish from animal decomposition. That is what Henry

730
00:46:31.840 --> 00:46:36.639
<v Speaker 11>Lea said, That's what a lot of experts in this

731
00:46:36.840 --> 00:46:43.119
<v Speaker 11>subject saying. But also, it wasn't detected. It wasn't detected

732
00:46:43.400 --> 00:46:47.039
<v Speaker 11>until almost three weeks after the death of Kayley. And

733
00:46:47.199 --> 00:46:51.400
<v Speaker 11>so you know, for anybody to assert that Casey was

734
00:46:51.519 --> 00:46:54.119
<v Speaker 11>driving around with her dead daughter in the trunk of

735
00:46:54.159 --> 00:46:57.079
<v Speaker 11>her car for three weeks, you have to ask the question,

736
00:46:57.320 --> 00:47:01.000
<v Speaker 11>is I do why wasn't there an order before three

737
00:47:01.039 --> 00:47:04.760
<v Speaker 11>weeks or two and a half weeks somebody would have smelled.

738
00:47:05.519 --> 00:47:08.719
<v Speaker 10>And and it wasn't in it? How long was it

739
00:47:08.800 --> 00:47:09.679
<v Speaker 10>in the impound though?

740
00:47:10.960 --> 00:47:15.079
<v Speaker 11>There was picked up almost a month after the death

741
00:47:15.280 --> 00:47:16.400
<v Speaker 11>of the daughter.

742
00:47:17.599 --> 00:47:20.679
<v Speaker 10>And that's why you know, you know, you've seen a

743
00:47:20.760 --> 00:47:23.079
<v Speaker 10>junk yard before, though, write or an impound. I mean,

744
00:47:25.039 --> 00:47:27.800
<v Speaker 10>is it possible. Isn't it possible that that smell might

745
00:47:27.880 --> 00:47:30.400
<v Speaker 10>not have been detected just because where you are and

746
00:47:30.519 --> 00:47:33.840
<v Speaker 10>who's near you know, no number of cars.

747
00:47:34.599 --> 00:47:37.280
<v Speaker 11>If you put a dead body or of anything and

748
00:47:37.400 --> 00:47:39.679
<v Speaker 11>that animal or any or anything in the trunk of

749
00:47:39.719 --> 00:47:44.119
<v Speaker 11>the car within a few days, you're going to be

750
00:47:44.519 --> 00:47:49.199
<v Speaker 11>You're going to have the putrid odor from that carcass

751
00:47:49.840 --> 00:47:51.559
<v Speaker 11>and uh, that's just the way it is.

752
00:47:52.480 --> 00:47:53.719
<v Speaker 10>And so.

753
00:47:55.360 --> 00:47:57.320
<v Speaker 11>The fact of the matter is that she abandoned the

754
00:47:57.440 --> 00:48:01.960
<v Speaker 11>car on a street near the street. She didn't try

755
00:48:02.000 --> 00:48:06.440
<v Speaker 11>to hide it. She chose to abandon the car near

756
00:48:06.519 --> 00:48:09.159
<v Speaker 11>the street where her mother drove to work every day.

757
00:48:10.800 --> 00:48:16.559
<v Speaker 11>So one of the things that anybody researching the case

758
00:48:16.599 --> 00:48:20.239
<v Speaker 11>obactively looks at is well, was she hiding, was she

759
00:48:20.679 --> 00:48:25.079
<v Speaker 11>exhibiting consciousness of guilt? Was she was she trying to

760
00:48:25.119 --> 00:48:28.119
<v Speaker 11>cover anything up? And you look at her and you

761
00:48:28.199 --> 00:48:31.679
<v Speaker 11>go into the lies that she told to police about

762
00:48:31.800 --> 00:48:37.280
<v Speaker 11>where Kaylie was and about where she worked. These are

763
00:48:37.360 --> 00:48:40.880
<v Speaker 11>lies that the police confirmed her lies at the snap

764
00:48:40.920 --> 00:48:44.599
<v Speaker 11>of the finger. She said she worked at Universal Studios.

765
00:48:44.639 --> 00:48:48.039
<v Speaker 11>So they call up Hr, and Hr says, I'm sorry,

766
00:48:48.079 --> 00:48:51.119
<v Speaker 11>she had worked in three years. And she says, well,

767
00:48:51.199 --> 00:48:56.280
<v Speaker 11>the nanny, this fictitious nanny that she invented, who had Kaylee,

768
00:48:57.360 --> 00:49:00.639
<v Speaker 11>according to her, lived in this part. And so they

769
00:49:00.679 --> 00:49:02.599
<v Speaker 11>go to the apartment and the apartment's been vacant for

770
00:49:02.719 --> 00:49:08.760
<v Speaker 11>six months. Yeah, so I mean, these are not lies

771
00:49:08.880 --> 00:49:13.159
<v Speaker 11>to protect herself. And then the why well.

772
00:49:13.199 --> 00:49:15.840
<v Speaker 10>Wait, wait a minute, How why are these why are

773
00:49:15.840 --> 00:49:17.960
<v Speaker 10>they're not lies? To protect herself.

774
00:49:18.760 --> 00:49:21.920
<v Speaker 11>Because they expose the fact that she's telling lies. In

775
00:49:21.960 --> 00:49:25.599
<v Speaker 11>other words, she says she works at a place that

776
00:49:26.199 --> 00:49:28.360
<v Speaker 11>she knows. Hr is going to tell them she hasn't

777
00:49:28.360 --> 00:49:31.320
<v Speaker 11>worked there for three years. And she tells them that

778
00:49:31.400 --> 00:49:33.920
<v Speaker 11>the nanny has a child, lives in this apartment. That's

779
00:49:33.960 --> 00:49:36.840
<v Speaker 11>where she's been with the nanny, and they go to

780
00:49:36.880 --> 00:49:38.639
<v Speaker 11>the apartment. It's been vacant for six months.

781
00:49:39.440 --> 00:49:42.480
<v Speaker 10>So she's doing this to She's doing this too for

782
00:49:42.599 --> 00:49:45.480
<v Speaker 10>what reason though? The police are looking at her with

783
00:49:45.559 --> 00:49:49.840
<v Speaker 10>suspicion because her parents are accusing her as well, are putting,

784
00:49:50.519 --> 00:49:54.800
<v Speaker 10>you know, the possibility that she did this, and so

785
00:49:54.960 --> 00:50:00.280
<v Speaker 10>then she is purposely she's purposely saying, listen, I work

786
00:50:00.280 --> 00:50:02.599
<v Speaker 10>at Universal, so that Universal can say, no, she hasn't

787
00:50:02.599 --> 00:50:04.719
<v Speaker 10>worked here for years, and then well, where's the child?

788
00:50:04.800 --> 00:50:07.000
<v Speaker 10>Where did you leave the child? Well, at this nanny,

789
00:50:07.079 --> 00:50:09.880
<v Speaker 10>but the nanny doesn't exist. Tell me why she on

790
00:50:10.039 --> 00:50:10.880
<v Speaker 10>earth anyone would do that.

791
00:50:11.840 --> 00:50:15.199
<v Speaker 11>That's the whole point. The point is that we and

792
00:50:15.400 --> 00:50:21.719
<v Speaker 11>me and everyone is judging her as if she should

793
00:50:21.760 --> 00:50:26.199
<v Speaker 11>behave the way we behaved. There were two psychiatric there

794
00:50:26.239 --> 00:50:31.000
<v Speaker 11>were three psychiatric evaluations of her detailed and at length.

795
00:50:31.159 --> 00:50:34.760
<v Speaker 11>Two of them were published, which I read, one by

796
00:50:34.760 --> 00:50:39.599
<v Speaker 11>a psychiatrist, one by a psychologists. Their conclusion is that

797
00:50:40.679 --> 00:50:45.840
<v Speaker 11>her statements of molestation by her father at a very

798
00:50:45.880 --> 00:50:51.760
<v Speaker 11>young age very often were consistent with their evaluation of her,

799
00:50:52.360 --> 00:50:57.920
<v Speaker 11>which they concluded she was not diagnosable with any kind

800
00:50:57.920 --> 00:51:04.880
<v Speaker 11>of mental illness whatsoever. And and so then you compound

801
00:51:05.440 --> 00:51:09.800
<v Speaker 11>that abuse with the traumatic death of her child, who

802
00:51:09.880 --> 00:51:13.519
<v Speaker 11>she had bonded with again, she says, at the hands

803
00:51:13.559 --> 00:51:17.280
<v Speaker 11>of her father, and you have a traumatic experience and

804
00:51:17.360 --> 00:51:22.719
<v Speaker 11>a traumatic reaction. That explains her behavior. That explains why

805
00:51:22.800 --> 00:51:26.519
<v Speaker 11>she invents these fictitious things and things that don't make sense.

806
00:51:27.599 --> 00:51:33.639
<v Speaker 11>That explains why she functions to the extent that she

807
00:51:33.760 --> 00:51:36.920
<v Speaker 11>can have pictures taken at a nightclub. But she was

808
00:51:36.960 --> 00:51:40.159
<v Speaker 11>at the nightclub because her boyfriend worked there. If he

809
00:51:40.199 --> 00:51:44.400
<v Speaker 11>had worked at a T shirt sales factory in Orlando somewhere,

810
00:51:44.400 --> 00:51:46.880
<v Speaker 11>at someplace on some corner, she would have been there.

811
00:51:47.880 --> 00:51:49.280
<v Speaker 11>She was there because he was there.

812
00:51:50.199 --> 00:51:53.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. See, the thing is I could say that I

813
00:51:53.199 --> 00:51:56.519
<v Speaker 10>can give you that a person's behavior captured in a

814
00:51:56.599 --> 00:51:59.960
<v Speaker 10>snapshot on a Facebook page by someone maybe they're smile

815
00:52:00.280 --> 00:52:03.880
<v Speaker 10>for a photo. I probably could have been seen smiling

816
00:52:04.039 --> 00:52:06.639
<v Speaker 10>for a photo a day or two after my best

817
00:52:06.679 --> 00:52:11.000
<v Speaker 10>friend's funeral, so taken out of context, I don't think

818
00:52:11.039 --> 00:52:13.559
<v Speaker 10>that that should be Again, I don't think that's evidence.

819
00:52:13.679 --> 00:52:17.000
<v Speaker 10>I think that's again open to interpretation. It's subjective, or

820
00:52:17.079 --> 00:52:21.880
<v Speaker 10>it's inconclusive. It's inconclusive evidence. So but I can't say

821
00:52:21.920 --> 00:52:23.960
<v Speaker 10>that now that I'm going to give you credit for

822
00:52:24.079 --> 00:52:26.760
<v Speaker 10>your explanation because you lost me on it, and it

823
00:52:26.840 --> 00:52:29.039
<v Speaker 10>doesn't make any difference if I agreed with you, because

824
00:52:29.199 --> 00:52:33.559
<v Speaker 10>all it is is that again, it's a tenuous, tenuous

825
00:52:33.920 --> 00:52:36.440
<v Speaker 10>link that you put these things together. So I'll just

826
00:52:36.559 --> 00:52:40.239
<v Speaker 10>give the person credit for the behavior. Cannot be judged

827
00:52:40.280 --> 00:52:43.280
<v Speaker 10>by a photo or a video or somebody said she

828
00:52:43.400 --> 00:52:44.599
<v Speaker 10>looked normal to me, you know.

829
00:52:44.760 --> 00:52:48.199
<v Speaker 11>So let's I do admit that you're putting in a

830
00:52:48.280 --> 00:52:51.960
<v Speaker 11>very difficult situation where I'm having to prove the innocence

831
00:52:52.360 --> 00:52:57.360
<v Speaker 11>of somebody that everybody hates at the top fertile to

832
00:52:57.440 --> 00:53:02.039
<v Speaker 11>get over. But I accept that that's the reality, and

833
00:53:02.920 --> 00:53:06.320
<v Speaker 11>and so I accept that, but it's it's tough to proven.

834
00:53:06.639 --> 00:53:09.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, the thing is, I look less at at motive

835
00:53:10.199 --> 00:53:13.000
<v Speaker 10>than some people because again, motive can be put together

836
00:53:13.119 --> 00:53:17.480
<v Speaker 10>to sound pretty good based on our supposition anyway, you know,

837
00:53:17.639 --> 00:53:21.719
<v Speaker 10>it can be especially now I'm affected by what happened

838
00:53:21.760 --> 00:53:24.639
<v Speaker 10>in the media and all the information and the emotion

839
00:53:24.920 --> 00:53:28.239
<v Speaker 10>my my natural bias. So then when I a motive

840
00:53:28.320 --> 00:53:31.000
<v Speaker 10>is put forward, well, geez, that makes sense, but makes

841
00:53:31.039 --> 00:53:35.280
<v Speaker 10>sense to my pre according to my preconceived thinking. So

842
00:53:35.880 --> 00:53:39.960
<v Speaker 10>the thing is is that again you can I'd like

843
00:53:40.079 --> 00:53:45.239
<v Speaker 10>to hear what the motive was for this, and to

844
00:53:45.440 --> 00:53:49.159
<v Speaker 10>hear exactly I mean this drowning. I want to hear

845
00:53:49.239 --> 00:53:54.480
<v Speaker 10>evidence of this drowning because I can't see how forensically

846
00:53:54.599 --> 00:53:58.960
<v Speaker 10>there there wasn't the ability to determine more about this

847
00:53:59.519 --> 00:54:02.360
<v Speaker 10>supposed an incident. Tell me a little bit more about

848
00:54:02.400 --> 00:54:06.280
<v Speaker 10>that evidence and that again that theory.

849
00:54:07.199 --> 00:54:09.320
<v Speaker 11>A lot of people Dan don't know where that story

850
00:54:09.440 --> 00:54:13.639
<v Speaker 11>came from. It came from Casey Anthony in her interview

851
00:54:13.960 --> 00:54:17.599
<v Speaker 11>with the psychiatrist, and she had not told her own

852
00:54:17.679 --> 00:54:22.480
<v Speaker 11>defense attorney about what happened to Kaylee in the backyard

853
00:54:22.639 --> 00:54:25.920
<v Speaker 11>swimming pool in June sixteenth, two thousand and eight for

854
00:54:26.079 --> 00:54:30.039
<v Speaker 11>over a year because she was in denial. She was

855
00:54:30.119 --> 00:54:32.119
<v Speaker 11>in denial when she made up the story about a

856
00:54:32.159 --> 00:54:36.559
<v Speaker 11>fictitious Danny. She was in denial of what happened to Kaylee.

857
00:54:37.159 --> 00:54:40.719
<v Speaker 11>She said when she was first arrested that she feels

858
00:54:40.800 --> 00:54:44.960
<v Speaker 11>Kaylee is close even though she had seen her dead

859
00:54:45.480 --> 00:54:49.960
<v Speaker 11>in her father's arms in the backyard. So she was

860
00:54:50.400 --> 00:54:55.239
<v Speaker 11>in deep, deep denial. And the people that worked with

861
00:54:56.039 --> 00:55:01.639
<v Speaker 11>PTSD soldiers with parents that experien in'st traumatic loss of

862
00:55:01.719 --> 00:55:06.280
<v Speaker 11>a child and who have other issues, they say that

863
00:55:06.400 --> 00:55:11.880
<v Speaker 11>this denial is typical and the disconnect between the way

864
00:55:11.960 --> 00:55:17.639
<v Speaker 11>people are and the reality is that people expect someone

865
00:55:17.760 --> 00:55:22.079
<v Speaker 11>to behave the way normal people do. They I can't

866
00:55:22.079 --> 00:55:24.760
<v Speaker 11>tell you how many women, especially have told me if

867
00:55:24.840 --> 00:55:27.559
<v Speaker 11>my daughter died, there's no way I wouldn't.

868
00:55:27.199 --> 00:55:28.159
<v Speaker 10>Report it to the police.

869
00:55:29.559 --> 00:55:33.440
<v Speaker 11>Of course, yes that's true, that's true for me. But

870
00:55:33.920 --> 00:55:37.199
<v Speaker 11>nobody's been in a situation where they were abused by

871
00:55:37.280 --> 00:55:43.119
<v Speaker 11>the person that showed you your dead daughter for years

872
00:55:43.199 --> 00:55:46.440
<v Speaker 11>as a child. And also the role of her mother

873
00:55:47.079 --> 00:55:51.480
<v Speaker 11>in this in denying the abuse. And then there's a

874
00:55:51.559 --> 00:55:57.000
<v Speaker 11>whole story thread Cindy's role and whether she covered up

875
00:55:57.800 --> 00:56:00.599
<v Speaker 11>not only the abuse of her husband to her daughter,

876
00:56:01.400 --> 00:56:05.920
<v Speaker 11>but the role George played. And there is the parents

877
00:56:05.960 --> 00:56:08.679
<v Speaker 11>of Kayley and the placement of Kaylee in the woods.

878
00:56:11.360 --> 00:56:14.719
<v Speaker 10>Okay, before we get to indicting Cindy here now as well,

879
00:56:15.360 --> 00:56:17.800
<v Speaker 10>I want to I want to say one thing here.

880
00:56:21.800 --> 00:56:24.440
<v Speaker 10>It's the same argument I was saying to you. In hindsight,

881
00:56:24.679 --> 00:56:29.599
<v Speaker 10>a psychiatrist or a psychologist analyzes the situation and goes, well,

882
00:56:29.639 --> 00:56:31.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, this happens quite often. We've seen it before.

883
00:56:32.440 --> 00:56:38.239
<v Speaker 10>PTSD in the act completely out of character, and they're traumatized,

884
00:56:38.360 --> 00:56:41.960
<v Speaker 10>and hence this is this of the odd odd odd behavior.

885
00:56:42.400 --> 00:56:45.000
<v Speaker 10>But here's the thing I know from the murder trial

886
00:56:45.039 --> 00:56:47.159
<v Speaker 10>that I was involved in. I'll and I know this

887
00:56:47.639 --> 00:56:51.119
<v Speaker 10>forever and ever. It comes from the defense lawyer's mouth.

888
00:56:53.000 --> 00:56:55.599
<v Speaker 10>Casey Anthony could have told her lawyer four or five

889
00:56:55.719 --> 00:56:59.400
<v Speaker 10>different tales. She also told her lawyer the tale of

890
00:56:59.559 --> 00:57:01.840
<v Speaker 10>that we just talked about that seemed to be ridiculous.

891
00:57:02.360 --> 00:57:05.559
<v Speaker 10>But the lawyer didn't call her on it, didn't force her,

892
00:57:05.639 --> 00:57:10.039
<v Speaker 10>didn't cross examiner in his office. She had that story,

893
00:57:10.199 --> 00:57:11.679
<v Speaker 10>she stuck to that story, and let me say, a

894
00:57:11.760 --> 00:57:14.719
<v Speaker 10>year later she had this other story. She could have

895
00:57:14.840 --> 00:57:18.360
<v Speaker 10>crafted the story. And I can dare say because from

896
00:57:18.400 --> 00:57:21.400
<v Speaker 10>my experience, and it wouldn't be the first lawyer that

897
00:57:21.480 --> 00:57:26.440
<v Speaker 10>did it, they encourage the crafting of a more reasonable story.

898
00:57:27.199 --> 00:57:30.079
<v Speaker 10>And again, there is only so many options. And if

899
00:57:30.119 --> 00:57:34.599
<v Speaker 10>you feel that your role in society is to defend

900
00:57:34.719 --> 00:57:37.440
<v Speaker 10>your client to the best, absolutely the best of your ability,

901
00:57:37.480 --> 00:57:40.079
<v Speaker 10>and then you look at whether you're supposed to lie

902
00:57:40.639 --> 00:57:43.800
<v Speaker 10>on your client's behalf or have your client lie or

903
00:57:43.880 --> 00:57:46.960
<v Speaker 10>perjure themselves on the stand regardless one of the main

904
00:57:47.159 --> 00:57:49.119
<v Speaker 10>the tenant, the main tenant, it really should be the

905
00:57:49.199 --> 00:57:52.639
<v Speaker 10>main tenant. And I would believe it is according to

906
00:57:53.159 --> 00:57:56.360
<v Speaker 10>society that you're not to tell a lie on behalf

907
00:57:56.400 --> 00:58:00.440
<v Speaker 10>of your client. So if you're not, you're not obliged

908
00:58:00.480 --> 00:58:02.320
<v Speaker 10>not to tell a lie. Then you have to determine

909
00:58:02.360 --> 00:58:06.039
<v Speaker 10>the truthfulness of your client's story. But just like you said,

910
00:58:06.519 --> 00:58:09.840
<v Speaker 10>this could be normal behavior, this could be this is

911
00:58:09.880 --> 00:58:13.360
<v Speaker 10>what happens in PTSD from the abuse again that we

912
00:58:14.119 --> 00:58:18.199
<v Speaker 10>don't have empirical proof occurred. And then he could have

913
00:58:18.360 --> 00:58:22.719
<v Speaker 10>crafted a story together her trotting out different stories till

914
00:58:22.800 --> 00:58:25.519
<v Speaker 10>they got a story that seemed to be the story

915
00:58:25.599 --> 00:58:30.519
<v Speaker 10>that could work to defend her. Isn't that a possibility?

916
00:58:31.239 --> 00:58:34.039
<v Speaker 11>Yes, it's definitely is a possibility, and it's something that

917
00:58:34.199 --> 00:58:39.360
<v Speaker 11>needs to be considered and looked at and evaluated and

918
00:58:39.519 --> 00:58:42.960
<v Speaker 11>so on and so forth, And as a research journalist,

919
00:58:43.119 --> 00:58:45.679
<v Speaker 11>that's what I do. And in the case of the

920
00:58:45.880 --> 00:58:53.000
<v Speaker 11>psychiatrists who's published reports or depositions by the prosecutor about

921
00:58:53.280 --> 00:58:59.000
<v Speaker 11>their subject, they found that everything in their reports was

922
00:58:59.280 --> 00:59:02.159
<v Speaker 11>and they go in to detail. They have things like

923
00:59:02.199 --> 00:59:08.119
<v Speaker 11>an MMPI, which is a gold standard of evaluating a person,

924
00:59:08.880 --> 00:59:15.920
<v Speaker 11>and she passed that within completely ranges. And there's two

925
00:59:15.960 --> 00:59:19.199
<v Speaker 11>of them that did this, and one of them asked

926
00:59:19.480 --> 00:59:22.920
<v Speaker 11>and pleaded with the prosecutor not to tell him that

927
00:59:23.440 --> 00:59:26.599
<v Speaker 11>because he didn't want to be associated with her. So

928
00:59:27.480 --> 00:59:32.559
<v Speaker 11>what I find throughout is an accused who has a

929
00:59:32.639 --> 00:59:36.920
<v Speaker 11>lot of people defending her objectively, like her friends, like

930
00:59:37.000 --> 00:59:40.800
<v Speaker 11>her colleagues, like these psychiatrists, and nobody wants to do it,

931
00:59:41.239 --> 00:59:44.480
<v Speaker 11>but they end up defending her anyway because they're compelled

932
00:59:44.559 --> 00:59:48.039
<v Speaker 11>to do that. And I could add the jury, and

933
00:59:48.320 --> 00:59:51.199
<v Speaker 11>they're all compelled to do it by nothing other than

934
00:59:51.360 --> 00:59:56.519
<v Speaker 11>an attachment they have to the truth. And I can

935
00:59:56.639 --> 01:00:00.159
<v Speaker 11>tell you for certain that the one sided narrative of

936
01:00:00.280 --> 01:00:05.719
<v Speaker 11>the media and in the public commentary was a incomplete

937
01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:08.719
<v Speaker 11>narrative of this story. And what I want to do

938
01:00:09.440 --> 01:00:12.719
<v Speaker 11>is complete that narrative. I want to present balance to

939
01:00:12.840 --> 01:00:15.280
<v Speaker 11>this story so that people can make the decision that

940
01:00:15.440 --> 01:00:19.599
<v Speaker 11>they need to make. But what I find fascinating is

941
01:00:19.719 --> 01:00:23.559
<v Speaker 11>so many people with no interest and no predisposition, and

942
01:00:23.760 --> 01:00:28.559
<v Speaker 11>no liking of this defendant. Nevertheless, from a jury, from

943
01:00:28.599 --> 01:00:34.519
<v Speaker 11>her friends, from the psychiatrists, they still defend her. And

944
01:00:34.599 --> 01:00:35.639
<v Speaker 11>that is fascinating to me.

945
01:00:37.519 --> 01:00:39.840
<v Speaker 10>The thing is, though, what do you make of the

946
01:00:39.960 --> 01:00:44.960
<v Speaker 10>presiding judge, because it's just earlier this month, coming out

947
01:00:45.079 --> 01:00:47.920
<v Speaker 10>publicly again, what reason would he have for this? And

948
01:00:48.039 --> 01:00:50.920
<v Speaker 10>what do you conclude from this? What are your thoughts

949
01:00:50.960 --> 01:00:53.400
<v Speaker 10>about the judge and the presiding judge coming out and

950
01:00:53.480 --> 01:00:58.079
<v Speaker 10>saying that there was ample evidence for the jury for

951
01:00:58.239 --> 01:01:01.119
<v Speaker 10>them to make a that you basically saying I believe

952
01:01:01.159 --> 01:01:01.760
<v Speaker 10>she was guilty.

953
01:01:03.159 --> 01:01:07.039
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, definitely. And Judge Belvin Perry, he took over the

954
01:01:07.119 --> 01:01:11.480
<v Speaker 11>case from Judge Stan Strickland, and Judge Strickland was excused

955
01:01:11.519 --> 01:01:13.280
<v Speaker 11>from the case. It's a polite way to put it,

956
01:01:13.760 --> 01:01:17.519
<v Speaker 11>because he was calling up a blogger who was saying

957
01:01:17.559 --> 01:01:19.719
<v Speaker 11>that she was guilty, and he was the judge on

958
01:01:19.800 --> 01:01:22.639
<v Speaker 11>the signed to this case originally, But he was calling

959
01:01:22.719 --> 01:01:27.280
<v Speaker 11>up a blogger who was, like everyone was saying that

960
01:01:27.360 --> 01:01:30.760
<v Speaker 11>she was guilty before the trial even began, and he

961
01:01:30.960 --> 01:01:33.280
<v Speaker 11>was telling his blogger to keep up the good work.

962
01:01:33.559 --> 01:01:36.639
<v Speaker 11>I'm on your side. So when this finally got out,

963
01:01:37.480 --> 01:01:42.559
<v Speaker 11>he was kicked off the case. So that's how Judge Perry. Yeah, absolutely,

964
01:01:42.920 --> 01:01:46.400
<v Speaker 11>But the whole I mentioned that because the whole institutional apparatus,

965
01:01:46.519 --> 01:01:52.239
<v Speaker 11>the prosecutor, the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, the former prosecutors

966
01:01:52.280 --> 01:01:56.320
<v Speaker 11>that were on hl N, like Sidney Hanowitz, and at infinitum,

967
01:01:56.960 --> 01:02:01.920
<v Speaker 11>everybody was beating up this accused person. Both before the

968
01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.320
<v Speaker 11>trial began and during the trial. There wasn't anybody who

969
01:02:05.440 --> 01:02:11.280
<v Speaker 11>was arguing her. The narrative of her possible innocence. Jose

970
01:02:11.440 --> 01:02:16.840
<v Speaker 11>Bias's book was titled Presumed Guilty. That's an appropriate title.

971
01:02:18.199 --> 01:02:21.239
<v Speaker 11>That's the reality of them. And so Judge Perry, the

972
01:02:21.320 --> 01:02:27.760
<v Speaker 11>whole institutional apparatus of those that prosecute people HLN is

973
01:02:27.960 --> 01:02:32.199
<v Speaker 11>kind of a caricature of that. They were all invested

974
01:02:32.440 --> 01:02:38.199
<v Speaker 11>in getting a conviction. And Judge Perry just couldn't quite

975
01:02:38.199 --> 01:02:43.480
<v Speaker 11>accept the fact that his courtroom acquittor and I take

976
01:02:43.519 --> 01:02:46.159
<v Speaker 11>the exact opposite point of view. I think the jury

977
01:02:47.159 --> 01:02:50.519
<v Speaker 11>was and I think the defense case and winning the

978
01:02:50.599 --> 01:02:56.280
<v Speaker 11>acquittal was a epitome of the American justice system and

979
01:02:56.440 --> 01:02:59.920
<v Speaker 11>defending the rights of an accused when there is no guilty,

980
01:03:00.119 --> 01:03:03.360
<v Speaker 11>there is no provable build in a court of law

981
01:03:03.440 --> 01:03:05.000
<v Speaker 11>within the four corners of the courtland.

982
01:03:07.880 --> 01:03:10.920
<v Speaker 10>You don't think it's irresponsible though, to point fingers at

983
01:03:10.960 --> 01:03:16.000
<v Speaker 10>Cindy possibly and especially directly at George in light of

984
01:03:16.760 --> 01:03:20.199
<v Speaker 10>no criminal charges. Do you think it's responsible?

985
01:03:21.360 --> 01:03:24.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, here's what I think. All I'm saying is, I'm

986
01:03:24.840 --> 01:03:30.039
<v Speaker 11>taking the words of cases to her published in her

987
01:03:30.119 --> 01:03:36.000
<v Speaker 11>published comments. To the psychiatrists who evaluated those comments, they

988
01:03:36.079 --> 01:03:42.920
<v Speaker 11>have things called malingering in their evaluation, and they concluded

989
01:03:43.159 --> 01:03:48.280
<v Speaker 11>that she was not malingering. And the psychiatrists ask, is

990
01:03:48.320 --> 01:03:50.639
<v Speaker 11>there any reason that you don't believe what she told you?

991
01:03:51.199 --> 01:03:53.159
<v Speaker 11>She said, there's no reason for me not to believe

992
01:03:53.199 --> 01:03:56.920
<v Speaker 11>what she told me. So her story is, which has

993
01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:00.519
<v Speaker 11>not been told, her father presented her with the dead

994
01:04:00.639 --> 01:04:05.039
<v Speaker 11>child at her home when they were alone together, and

995
01:04:05.199 --> 01:04:08.880
<v Speaker 11>he took the child and disposed everywhere was found. As

996
01:04:08.920 --> 01:04:11.880
<v Speaker 11>far as she knows, he disposed of it there. And

997
01:04:14.320 --> 01:04:24.119
<v Speaker 11>also we have the objective that Cindy had reason to

998
01:04:24.280 --> 01:04:29.320
<v Speaker 11>understand that the issues going on in their home were

999
01:04:29.360 --> 01:04:35.880
<v Speaker 11>affecting Casey and were making her vulnerable to suspicions, and she,

1000
01:04:36.360 --> 01:04:39.760
<v Speaker 11>instead of defending her daughter, chose to side with George.

1001
01:04:39.800 --> 01:04:43.440
<v Speaker 11>She sat with George during the trial. And there are

1002
01:04:43.440 --> 01:04:46.360
<v Speaker 11>a number of details about Cindy's behavior that I'm going

1003
01:04:46.440 --> 01:04:50.599
<v Speaker 11>to lay out in the book that suggest that she

1004
01:04:50.880 --> 01:04:56.519
<v Speaker 11>was much more knowledgeable of George's role than she told police.

1005
01:04:59.039 --> 01:05:01.519
<v Speaker 10>Now I know I didn't, I said, I don't really

1006
01:05:01.599 --> 01:05:08.119
<v Speaker 10>care about motive. But why would George if Kaylee drowned,

1007
01:05:08.599 --> 01:05:10.440
<v Speaker 10>why would he present the body to Casey?

1008
01:05:13.679 --> 01:05:18.000
<v Speaker 11>The a theory, one theory for George's role in this

1009
01:05:19.039 --> 01:05:23.119
<v Speaker 11>was that George feared that Kaylee was his child.

1010
01:05:26.840 --> 01:05:30.079
<v Speaker 10>And then where where's the where's the evidence? When? When

1011
01:05:30.119 --> 01:05:30.679
<v Speaker 10>did he say this?

1012
01:05:30.880 --> 01:05:34.840
<v Speaker 11>This is just the theory though I said, it's the theory, okay,

1013
01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.559
<v Speaker 11>that that it's one theory to explain the behavior of George.

1014
01:05:39.639 --> 01:05:42.280
<v Speaker 10>And we have for the.

1015
01:05:43.880 --> 01:05:48.880
<v Speaker 11>Allegation of abuse Casey Anthony. And what I'm talking about

1016
01:05:49.239 --> 01:05:53.960
<v Speaker 11>is the narrative of Casey Anthony's side of events that

1017
01:05:54.599 --> 01:05:58.960
<v Speaker 11>has not been told, and so she says that George

1018
01:05:59.119 --> 01:06:04.199
<v Speaker 11>abused her. These psychiatrists say that everything in their evaluation

1019
01:06:04.400 --> 01:06:07.639
<v Speaker 11>of her is consistent with somebody who had been abused

1020
01:06:07.679 --> 01:06:08.280
<v Speaker 11>by her father.

1021
01:06:10.400 --> 01:06:13.159
<v Speaker 10>The thing is, isn't it Is it dueling psychiatrist? Though

1022
01:06:13.199 --> 01:06:15.079
<v Speaker 10>it wasn't it? You know it? Can it be possible

1023
01:06:15.119 --> 01:06:18.599
<v Speaker 10>because I've seen in numerous numerous cases the psychiatrist is paid.

1024
01:06:18.719 --> 01:06:23.800
<v Speaker 10>That psychiatrist is well known for primarily working for defense.

1025
01:06:24.840 --> 01:06:26.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, these guys get sort of reputations and they're

1026
01:06:26.880 --> 01:06:28.880
<v Speaker 10>asked to do things. I mean, this is this is

1027
01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:31.679
<v Speaker 10>not uncommon. I mean, there are some people that are.

1028
01:06:31.679 --> 01:06:35.719
<v Speaker 11>For hire, that's right, And in this case, that's one

1029
01:06:35.760 --> 01:06:40.920
<v Speaker 11>thing I looked at. There was a psychiatrist, doctor David Danziger,

1030
01:06:41.639 --> 01:06:47.599
<v Speaker 11>who primarily is used by prosecution by the prosecution witness.

1031
01:06:48.480 --> 01:06:51.920
<v Speaker 11>And the other side was a psychologist, doctor William White

1032
01:06:53.320 --> 01:06:57.039
<v Speaker 11>Wi t Z. He was primarily used by defense. The

1033
01:06:57.159 --> 01:07:00.960
<v Speaker 11>reason they were both called by the defense was that

1034
01:07:01.239 --> 01:07:04.199
<v Speaker 11>they were called in by the court and by the

1035
01:07:04.280 --> 01:07:08.440
<v Speaker 11>prosecution to evaluate her when she was first arrested for

1036
01:07:10.039 --> 01:07:13.360
<v Speaker 11>so they were I had interviewed her at the court's

1037
01:07:13.400 --> 01:07:17.679
<v Speaker 11>request for competencies, competency issues. I was they had no

1038
01:07:17.800 --> 01:07:20.800
<v Speaker 11>money to go out and hire anybody, so he asked

1039
01:07:20.800 --> 01:07:26.079
<v Speaker 11>them to sign on for this case. Doctor Danziger is

1040
01:07:26.159 --> 01:07:29.639
<v Speaker 11>the one that pleaded not to be deposed because he

1041
01:07:29.679 --> 01:07:33.039
<v Speaker 11>didn't want to be associated in any way with defending her.

1042
01:07:33.199 --> 01:07:38.960
<v Speaker 11>And he said that before the deposition, and the prosecutor,

1043
01:07:39.039 --> 01:07:41.440
<v Speaker 11>Jeff Ashton, said, I'm sorry, you're going to be deposed.

1044
01:07:42.119 --> 01:07:44.559
<v Speaker 11>You're going to tell me what you found. And that

1045
01:07:44.760 --> 01:07:48.960
<v Speaker 11>was later published by order of Judge Calvin Perry. And

1046
01:07:49.079 --> 01:07:52.360
<v Speaker 11>so to answer your question, you've got actually, as it

1047
01:07:52.440 --> 01:07:56.639
<v Speaker 11>turns out, because of the lack of money by the

1048
01:07:56.719 --> 01:08:02.079
<v Speaker 11>defense team, you had actually a balanced evaluation. As it

1049
01:08:02.159 --> 01:08:07.199
<v Speaker 11>turns out, one prosecution psychiatrist, if you will, one defense psychiatrist,

1050
01:08:07.960 --> 01:08:11.920
<v Speaker 11>and they both concurred. They both looked at each other

1051
01:08:11.960 --> 01:08:16.840
<v Speaker 11>as evidence and became to the independent conclusion. And again,

1052
01:08:17.359 --> 01:08:21.960
<v Speaker 11>what I'm doing is taking Casey said and what is

1053
01:08:22.039 --> 01:08:27.439
<v Speaker 11>supported by independent in this case, psychiatric evaluation and just

1054
01:08:27.840 --> 01:08:32.520
<v Speaker 11>stating it. That's all. When you say I'm indicting George,

1055
01:08:32.600 --> 01:08:36.319
<v Speaker 11>no molt, sir, I'm not indicting George. This is what

1056
01:08:36.479 --> 01:08:37.119
<v Speaker 11>Casey's doing.

1057
01:08:37.920 --> 01:08:38.279
<v Speaker 10>Happened.

1058
01:08:38.760 --> 01:08:40.359
<v Speaker 11>She has a right to say what happened.

1059
01:08:41.359 --> 01:08:43.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, I was I was involved in a

1060
01:08:43.039 --> 01:08:46.319
<v Speaker 10>murder trial. And it's again it's not apples and apples,

1061
01:08:46.399 --> 01:08:49.159
<v Speaker 10>But I mean what the killer said was that he

1062
01:08:49.279 --> 01:08:53.239
<v Speaker 10>accused his stepbrother of sexually assaulting him for a period

1063
01:08:53.279 --> 01:08:57.760
<v Speaker 10>of years. Again, no criminal charges were ever laid. The lawyer,

1064
01:08:57.880 --> 01:09:00.720
<v Speaker 10>defense lawyer got to say that without an interruption by

1065
01:09:00.760 --> 01:09:03.479
<v Speaker 10>any prosecute by the prosecution at all, and it was

1066
01:09:04.560 --> 01:09:07.960
<v Speaker 10>it was repeated. Then it was an allegation by the

1067
01:09:08.079 --> 01:09:11.399
<v Speaker 10>killer that when he was in a interview room with

1068
01:09:11.640 --> 01:09:15.760
<v Speaker 10>a camera on and to two cops customarily that's supposedly

1069
01:09:15.760 --> 01:09:17.600
<v Speaker 10>a couple of gun and put put it to his head.

1070
01:09:17.640 --> 01:09:20.960
<v Speaker 10>And then the defense lawyer was asking the witness, which

1071
01:09:21.039 --> 01:09:24.520
<v Speaker 10>happened to be me, why didn't report it to the police.

1072
01:09:25.600 --> 01:09:27.239
<v Speaker 10>So you can see that some of the stuff can

1073
01:09:27.439 --> 01:09:37.960
<v Speaker 10>allegations can be unchallenged. Thinks things can be said. You know,

1074
01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:40.840
<v Speaker 10>it was a Casey Anthony could said a lot of things.

1075
01:09:41.159 --> 01:09:44.159
<v Speaker 10>She said again she lied, But then again we have

1076
01:09:44.239 --> 01:09:48.479
<v Speaker 10>a reason for her being this series of lies. Again, okay, okay,

1077
01:09:48.560 --> 01:09:50.640
<v Speaker 10>there's a logical reason. And if we listen to what

1078
01:09:50.840 --> 01:09:55.840
<v Speaker 10>your explanation is, and then we then at some point

1079
01:09:56.159 --> 01:09:59.960
<v Speaker 10>have to take what she says as gospel. And again

1080
01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:02.680
<v Speaker 10>and this other man is a police officer, and again

1081
01:10:02.720 --> 01:10:05.640
<v Speaker 10>he had a mistress. Again, some people want to judge

1082
01:10:05.680 --> 01:10:09.600
<v Speaker 10>people by ethics or their moral code. Well, you know,

1083
01:10:09.720 --> 01:10:13.359
<v Speaker 10>we can't do that. That's luckily the court's try not

1084
01:10:13.479 --> 01:10:17.279
<v Speaker 10>to do that. So but again you're you're asking people

1085
01:10:17.359 --> 01:10:20.439
<v Speaker 10>to believe her on these things that you believe or

1086
01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:24.079
<v Speaker 10>or seem more sensible to you though that fit into

1087
01:10:24.279 --> 01:10:28.640
<v Speaker 10>the the logical uh you know nexus, you know.

1088
01:10:28.800 --> 01:10:34.199
<v Speaker 11>So it's actually, as I said before, it's trying to

1089
01:10:34.359 --> 01:10:38.399
<v Speaker 11>prove somebody is innocent, is say, sometimes it seems an

1090
01:10:38.439 --> 01:10:43.199
<v Speaker 11>impossible sure, and trying to do it in the context

1091
01:10:43.640 --> 01:10:49.720
<v Speaker 11>of a public environment where nobody believes she's innocent anyway,

1092
01:10:50.279 --> 01:10:53.600
<v Speaker 11>makes that virtually an impossible choice. So what my task

1093
01:10:53.840 --> 01:10:57.600
<v Speaker 11>is as a research journalist is to simply introduce balance,

1094
01:10:58.239 --> 01:11:03.479
<v Speaker 11>using sources that are published and using in this case,

1095
01:11:03.640 --> 01:11:06.600
<v Speaker 11>the words of the acquitted defendant herself.

1096
01:11:08.520 --> 01:11:10.199
<v Speaker 10>I see. So what you're really trying to do is

1097
01:11:10.199 --> 01:11:12.760
<v Speaker 10>that you're trying to put a lot more information out

1098
01:11:12.760 --> 01:11:16.079
<v Speaker 10>there regardless and say, listen, this is what I am

1099
01:11:16.279 --> 01:11:18.880
<v Speaker 10>looking at. I'm looking at much more information, so that

1100
01:11:18.960 --> 01:11:23.640
<v Speaker 10>your first priority is to provide much more information. Again,

1101
01:11:23.760 --> 01:11:26.560
<v Speaker 10>so you say, because so you can have a more

1102
01:11:26.640 --> 01:11:31.520
<v Speaker 10>balanced look at this perspective because there wasn't a balanced perspective.

1103
01:11:33.199 --> 01:11:35.880
<v Speaker 11>I'm kind of in the same camp as Barry Sessman,

1104
01:11:37.319 --> 01:11:41.159
<v Speaker 11>as also Howard Kurtz, who said on several occasions he

1105
01:11:41.159 --> 01:11:44.600
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't cover the trial on his reliable sources, as CNN

1106
01:11:44.760 --> 01:11:49.319
<v Speaker 11>program which looks at the media, very highly regarded program

1107
01:11:50.399 --> 01:11:54.920
<v Speaker 11>because of the biased reporting on this case. And also

1108
01:11:55.880 --> 01:11:59.720
<v Speaker 11>Jeffrey Tuban, there's a CNN legal analyst, very highly regarded.

1109
01:12:00.239 --> 01:12:05.479
<v Speaker 11>He made comments that the media owes Casey Anthony an apology.

1110
01:12:06.680 --> 01:12:12.039
<v Speaker 11>So my role is kind of with them, and that

1111
01:12:12.279 --> 01:12:15.800
<v Speaker 11>is I'm looking at this as a journalist and saying,

1112
01:12:16.079 --> 01:12:20.039
<v Speaker 11>this has been an unbalanced narrative for sure, and we've

1113
01:12:20.079 --> 01:12:24.359
<v Speaker 11>got all this information out there that would support the

1114
01:12:24.520 --> 01:12:30.720
<v Speaker 11>jury's decision, an unsympathetic jury's decision, to support what her

1115
01:12:30.800 --> 01:12:36.239
<v Speaker 11>friends said about her, to support what the psychiatrists said

1116
01:12:36.239 --> 01:12:41.439
<v Speaker 11>about her that nobody is listening to. And as a journalist,

1117
01:12:41.680 --> 01:12:43.439
<v Speaker 11>that's my job, that's.

1118
01:12:43.319 --> 01:12:43.920
<v Speaker 3>My role.

1119
01:12:45.439 --> 01:12:52.000
<v Speaker 10>Right now. Tell us about the status of the book itself,

1120
01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:54.920
<v Speaker 10>and again the title.

1121
01:12:56.359 --> 01:13:02.119
<v Speaker 11>The Court of Public Opinion Casey Anthony, And you're asking

1122
01:13:02.439 --> 01:13:04.319
<v Speaker 11>to kind of spill my guts a little bit on

1123
01:13:04.439 --> 01:13:08.880
<v Speaker 11>this subject. I have a literary agent who went to

1124
01:13:10.439 --> 01:13:13.239
<v Speaker 11>Simon and Schuster, went to Penguin Books, went to all

1125
01:13:13.279 --> 01:13:17.439
<v Speaker 11>the major publishers with whom he has connections, and he

1126
01:13:17.640 --> 01:13:20.600
<v Speaker 11>was told that nobody is going to publish any book

1127
01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:27.279
<v Speaker 11>defending this individual. It's a quidded dependent because everybody believes

1128
01:13:27.560 --> 01:13:33.560
<v Speaker 11>she's guilty. Okay, So these this is the publishing industry

1129
01:13:33.840 --> 01:13:39.640
<v Speaker 11>in America. They don't want a point of view contrary

1130
01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:45.600
<v Speaker 11>to the consensus in America. It's a sad commentary. It's true,

1131
01:13:45.920 --> 01:13:51.680
<v Speaker 11>but it's unbelievably sad. And so I've got to protect

1132
01:13:51.880 --> 01:13:58.199
<v Speaker 11>the publisher I've got to protect their financial interest and

1133
01:14:00.039 --> 01:14:02.439
<v Speaker 11>rease date and their name is something that they're in

1134
01:14:02.560 --> 01:14:05.239
<v Speaker 11>control of, and I just have to leave it at that.

1135
01:14:05.680 --> 01:14:10.439
<v Speaker 11>But it's because of this extraordinary circumstance. Without that circumstance

1136
01:14:10.920 --> 01:14:15.680
<v Speaker 11>of the institution of the publishing industry refusing to even

1137
01:14:15.800 --> 01:14:20.319
<v Speaker 11>read my proposal, I wouldn't be in that situation. But

1138
01:14:21.600 --> 01:14:24.840
<v Speaker 11>as I told Barry, when the article was published and

1139
01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:27.800
<v Speaker 11>we got the reaction, it got the most reaction in

1140
01:14:27.880 --> 01:14:32.359
<v Speaker 11>the history of Harvard's media watchdog program, I said, I'm

1141
01:14:32.399 --> 01:14:36.000
<v Speaker 11>embracing it. And that's exactly what I'm doing.

1142
01:14:40.399 --> 01:14:43.600
<v Speaker 10>So I can sort of answer that question. The book

1143
01:14:43.680 --> 01:14:47.279
<v Speaker 10>is on hold, till Am said.

1144
01:14:49.600 --> 01:14:52.279
<v Speaker 11>I can't say anything about it to protect the publisher.

1145
01:14:53.319 --> 01:14:57.760
<v Speaker 10>Okay, Okay, that's valid. So anyway, so this is what

1146
01:14:57.880 --> 01:14:58.359
<v Speaker 10>people will know.

1147
01:14:58.680 --> 01:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1148
01:14:58.840 --> 01:15:00.880
<v Speaker 10>Do you have a website that to people might be

1149
01:15:00.960 --> 01:15:04.720
<v Speaker 10>able to contact you or to interact with you, Facebook

1150
01:15:04.800 --> 01:15:05.920
<v Speaker 10>page something.

1151
01:15:06.600 --> 01:15:11.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's writer Keith like writer Keith dot com.

1152
01:15:14.520 --> 01:15:17.960
<v Speaker 10>And you welcome people contacting you obviously, Oh, absolutely.

1153
01:15:18.319 --> 01:15:23.239
<v Speaker 11>I invite their criticism, comments, support ideas.

1154
01:15:24.680 --> 01:15:31.439
<v Speaker 10>Always. Like you say, the Nieman article really elicited a

1155
01:15:31.520 --> 01:15:34.439
<v Speaker 10>lot of response strong.

1156
01:15:36.039 --> 01:15:41.359
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, build records and for reader response and not surprisingly,

1157
01:15:42.720 --> 01:15:47.119
<v Speaker 11>and it should took the position to ask people to

1158
01:15:48.439 --> 01:15:55.199
<v Speaker 11>always reserve a part of their judgment process for a

1159
01:15:55.359 --> 01:15:59.920
<v Speaker 11>balanced source of information to what you're listening to, especially

1160
01:16:00.079 --> 01:16:01.880
<v Speaker 11>being presented by the media.

1161
01:16:04.960 --> 01:16:10.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's you know, it's very interesting too that the

1162
01:16:12.199 --> 01:16:14.640
<v Speaker 10>way you've presented this case as well. Again, I have

1163
01:16:14.800 --> 01:16:17.800
<v Speaker 10>to applaud you at least for well not at least,

1164
01:16:17.840 --> 01:16:20.760
<v Speaker 10>I have to applaud you for being able to have

1165
01:16:20.920 --> 01:16:24.520
<v Speaker 10>this bull's eye on your head here the discouragement of

1166
01:16:24.840 --> 01:16:29.640
<v Speaker 10>the mainstream media, even though this deserves to have a

1167
01:16:29.800 --> 01:16:33.319
<v Speaker 10>numerous books to have be written about it, given the

1168
01:16:33.479 --> 01:16:37.239
<v Speaker 10>attention that the trial had, and especially with the acquittal

1169
01:16:37.800 --> 01:16:42.800
<v Speaker 10>and again a fairly strong acquittal, that there wouldn't be

1170
01:16:42.880 --> 01:16:46.399
<v Speaker 10>at least a publisher thinking just of the bottom line

1171
01:16:46.439 --> 01:16:49.319
<v Speaker 10>and saying, geez, you know this, this is a controversial book,

1172
01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:52.960
<v Speaker 10>but there wasn't acquittal, and and you know, you sound

1173
01:16:53.039 --> 01:16:55.439
<v Speaker 10>like a very responsible and you and you read like

1174
01:16:55.479 --> 01:16:58.640
<v Speaker 10>a very responsible, sensible person. You're not a Nancy Grace

1175
01:16:59.159 --> 01:17:05.239
<v Speaker 10>of this subject here. You're not, you know, again, sensationalizing

1176
01:17:05.359 --> 01:17:09.199
<v Speaker 10>something that's already got enough sensation to it already. So

1177
01:17:09.359 --> 01:17:13.079
<v Speaker 10>I applaud you for taking this stance and being strong

1178
01:17:13.359 --> 01:17:16.880
<v Speaker 10>and in your conviction, and because you do sound very

1179
01:17:16.960 --> 01:17:20.960
<v Speaker 10>very reasonable in your argument. And so I applaud you

1180
01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:22.960
<v Speaker 10>for taking this because I know that you would be

1181
01:17:23.039 --> 01:17:28.479
<v Speaker 10>the victim of derision. And it's a rough ride taking

1182
01:17:28.520 --> 01:17:29.000
<v Speaker 10>this position.

1183
01:17:29.079 --> 01:17:32.680
<v Speaker 11>I know that I appreciate that. And of course there's

1184
01:17:32.720 --> 01:17:36.800
<v Speaker 11>a really my bottom line motivation, and what prompted me

1185
01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:41.880
<v Speaker 11>to begin to look at the story was really a

1186
01:17:42.720 --> 01:17:47.760
<v Speaker 11>belief in the American people and in our culture that

1187
01:17:49.199 --> 01:17:53.920
<v Speaker 11>is better than the media is serving us. And the

1188
01:17:54.079 --> 01:17:58.920
<v Speaker 11>characterization that I used earlier of the bullying, the bullying

1189
01:17:59.119 --> 01:18:03.520
<v Speaker 11>business potle that I see in HLN for example, and

1190
01:18:04.439 --> 01:18:08.720
<v Speaker 11>of an accused that to me is a mathemat to

1191
01:18:08.840 --> 01:18:12.359
<v Speaker 11>what the American people and the Canadian people, and the

1192
01:18:12.439 --> 01:18:17.239
<v Speaker 11>Mexican people and everybody need to stand for and stand

1193
01:18:17.319 --> 01:18:25.079
<v Speaker 11>up against the fact that anybody can be robbed of

1194
01:18:25.159 --> 01:18:29.000
<v Speaker 11>the presumption of innocence when they're on trial for their life.

1195
01:18:30.560 --> 01:18:34.000
<v Speaker 11>At the end of the day, there's no reason to

1196
01:18:34.119 --> 01:18:40.800
<v Speaker 11>do that. If the evidence is there. You have to

1197
01:18:40.880 --> 01:18:44.399
<v Speaker 11>have belief in the system that it will prevail. And

1198
01:18:44.960 --> 01:18:46.920
<v Speaker 11>you can go back to old Jay and like you say,

1199
01:18:47.119 --> 01:18:51.479
<v Speaker 11>everybody said it's karralative big day. Maybe it is, but

1200
01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:55.399
<v Speaker 11>that's a separate subject. In that case, I'd be happy

1201
01:18:55.439 --> 01:18:58.359
<v Speaker 11>to talk to you about it sometime. But in this case,

1202
01:18:58.720 --> 01:19:03.880
<v Speaker 11>there is the possibility that a innocent person is being

1203
01:19:04.319 --> 01:19:08.800
<v Speaker 11>hounded and presented from the freedom that everybody in this

1204
01:19:08.920 --> 01:19:13.720
<v Speaker 11>country has protected has as a right, as a protected life,

1205
01:19:14.600 --> 01:19:18.319
<v Speaker 11>life and the pursuit of happiness in the face of

1206
01:19:19.439 --> 01:19:24.760
<v Speaker 11>illegal acquittal, and there's the possibility that maybe there's an injustice,

1207
01:19:26.159 --> 01:19:31.600
<v Speaker 11>and that as long as there's that possibility, the obligation

1208
01:19:31.720 --> 01:19:36.359
<v Speaker 11>of journalists is to at least present a balanced two

1209
01:19:36.960 --> 01:19:37.640
<v Speaker 11>of that story.

1210
01:19:39.720 --> 01:19:46.119
<v Speaker 10>Well, it is a also a a story that it

1211
01:19:46.239 --> 01:19:50.319
<v Speaker 10>should be a warning to journalists and to it's a journalist.

1212
01:19:50.439 --> 01:19:53.840
<v Speaker 10>And I guess broadcasters that you know, if you rush

1213
01:19:53.920 --> 01:19:58.800
<v Speaker 10>to judgment, you might look like, you know, you might

1214
01:19:58.880 --> 01:20:01.680
<v Speaker 10>look very very wrong on this righteous side that you're

1215
01:20:01.720 --> 01:20:05.199
<v Speaker 10>trying to present yourself as you know in that there's

1216
01:20:05.239 --> 01:20:08.359
<v Speaker 10>a reason why publishers didn't publish books till the outcome

1217
01:20:08.560 --> 01:20:13.520
<v Speaker 10>of that book or of that case occurred. Kensington Press,

1218
01:20:13.560 --> 01:20:17.199
<v Speaker 10>for example, will not publish any books till the verdict

1219
01:20:17.560 --> 01:20:21.479
<v Speaker 10>has been done. So that's and you know, and I

1220
01:20:21.560 --> 01:20:25.760
<v Speaker 10>mean they're not so they represent journalists every you know,

1221
01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:28.079
<v Speaker 10>day in and day out, and they were and that's

1222
01:20:28.159 --> 01:20:32.880
<v Speaker 10>their policy to do that. And and broadcasters, uh, and

1223
01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:36.000
<v Speaker 10>people that have gone through journalism courses and schools and

1224
01:20:36.520 --> 01:20:39.720
<v Speaker 10>have been taught and work at agencies should know a

1225
01:20:39.840 --> 01:20:42.279
<v Speaker 10>lot better. So I think this the bottom line of

1226
01:20:42.319 --> 01:20:46.279
<v Speaker 10>these corporations. I don't think they have journalism as their foundation.

1227
01:20:47.039 --> 01:20:50.600
<v Speaker 10>And doing things like Nancy Grace yaking and yapp and

1228
01:20:50.720 --> 01:20:53.039
<v Speaker 10>and accusing and and this is not the first time

1229
01:20:53.159 --> 01:20:57.279
<v Speaker 10>she has done harm to a to and again a

1230
01:20:57.359 --> 01:21:03.159
<v Speaker 10>person that was acquitted, you know, it's legend her behavior

1231
01:21:03.199 --> 01:21:07.039
<v Speaker 10>and it doesn't end, you know, so it's it's it's

1232
01:21:07.119 --> 01:21:12.560
<v Speaker 10>a story that people should really pay attention to because

1233
01:21:13.760 --> 01:21:16.880
<v Speaker 10>there are so many wrongful convictions in the US and

1234
01:21:17.079 --> 01:21:23.640
<v Speaker 10>the same kind of misdirected media, misinforming media and irresponsible

1235
01:21:23.720 --> 01:21:27.239
<v Speaker 10>media could do a story where the outcome could be

1236
01:21:27.319 --> 01:21:31.039
<v Speaker 10>much different and people could be, you know, something that

1237
01:21:31.079 --> 01:21:33.359
<v Speaker 10>they could regret for the rest of their lives. The

1238
01:21:33.479 --> 01:21:37.079
<v Speaker 10>people it seems here that believed Casey Anthony was guilty

1239
01:21:37.199 --> 01:21:41.880
<v Speaker 10>before still believe Casey Anthony is guilty and they're going

1240
01:21:41.960 --> 01:21:45.399
<v Speaker 10>to stick to that. I believe, But again, I think

1241
01:21:45.439 --> 01:21:47.840
<v Speaker 10>it is important. That's why I've had you on the

1242
01:21:47.880 --> 01:21:50.600
<v Speaker 10>program here to at least give you the opportunity to

1243
01:21:52.199 --> 01:21:54.279
<v Speaker 10>to tell your side of the story and to state

1244
01:21:54.359 --> 01:21:56.479
<v Speaker 10>your case. And you've done it effectively.

1245
01:21:56.520 --> 01:22:00.560
<v Speaker 11>I think I've pawed you very much for giving me opportunity.

1246
01:22:02.319 --> 01:22:06.239
<v Speaker 10>Well, well, thank you very much, and please get back

1247
01:22:06.800 --> 01:22:08.840
<v Speaker 10>get a hold of me when the book actually does

1248
01:22:08.960 --> 01:22:11.000
<v Speaker 10>come out, too, because that's going to be another story

1249
01:22:11.039 --> 01:22:15.119
<v Speaker 10>in terms of the response and everything surrounding that. And

1250
01:22:15.239 --> 01:22:18.119
<v Speaker 10>of course I want to be really brushed up on

1251
01:22:18.279 --> 01:22:23.399
<v Speaker 10>this and re examine this entire case and read your

1252
01:22:23.439 --> 01:22:26.359
<v Speaker 10>book and look at this much more carefully, and then

1253
01:22:26.439 --> 01:22:28.199
<v Speaker 10>have you back on and we can talk about it again.

1254
01:22:28.319 --> 01:22:30.359
<v Speaker 10>So I want to thank you very much for this

1255
01:22:30.439 --> 01:22:34.960
<v Speaker 10>interview Keith Long talking about the Court of Public Opinion

1256
01:22:35.119 --> 01:22:38.960
<v Speaker 10>Casey Anthony with my special guest journalist and author, Keith Long.

1257
01:22:39.039 --> 01:22:41.439
<v Speaker 10>Thank you very much, Keith, have yourself a great evening,
