Speaker 1: So I saw this article. He says, Tucker and Nick Flent,
Speaker 1: you should be neutralized.
Speaker 2: Bring it on. Who's going to do it?
Speaker 3: You?
Speaker 1: Bring it on. You want to neutralize me, you know
Speaker 1: where to find me, Josh, why don't you do it yourself?
Speaker 1: They say, neutralize us, Well, you know they could neutralize us.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they could. I'm sure they got bombs inside
Speaker 1: the pagers. I'm sure they'd have a big laugh about that.
Speaker 1: Take out one Nick Flents, watch a thousand more take
Speaker 1: my place, and there'll be one hundred times more radical.
Speaker 2: Go ahead, it won't go the way you think. Bring
Speaker 2: it on, exactly. Bring it on. They already lost the debate. Man.
Speaker 2: They literally cannot debate these topics. It's over.
Speaker 4: They can't stop it, to the point that you now
Speaker 4: have the Vice President of the United States who's going
Speaker 4: to TPUSA events, which, by the way, I'm going to
Speaker 4: critique him a lot J d Evans, But I want
Speaker 4: to start by saying respect. Respect for doing that, Respect
Speaker 4: for going to an event and taking unscripted questions from
Speaker 4: a bunch of kids that like you didn't have to
Speaker 4: do that, So kudos for that. Now we're gonna get
Speaker 4: into your answers, which I think you did a good
Speaker 4: job answering them. I'm not saying that you told the
Speaker 4: truth per se, but I respected the fact that you
Speaker 4: did it, and I thought that your answers were quality.
Speaker 2: We'll break them down a little bit though.
Speaker 4: But to get back to that foint Is clip that
Speaker 4: I opened up with, I just want to emphasize, like
Speaker 4: he's not overstating it when he's talking about sure, I'm
Speaker 4: sure you'd like to neutralize me, Sure you like to
Speaker 4: put a bomb on my pager or something like that.
Speaker 4: It's like, I know, people think he just sounds like
Speaker 4: a paranoid lunatic.
Speaker 2: I don't think so.
Speaker 4: And the reason I say that a lot of people
Speaker 4: probably aren't aware of this story because it just happened
Speaker 4: earlier this morning or late last night.
Speaker 2: I should say.
Speaker 4: The esteemed Josh Hammer came out with a article where
Speaker 4: he calls for both Tucker Carlson and Nick quinta Is
Speaker 4: to be neutralized. But he starts off by analogizing it
Speaker 4: to a fox in the henhouse. Well, for those that
Speaker 4: don't know, what you do with a fox that's in
Speaker 4: the henhouse is just stop it violently. So I think
Speaker 4: it's fair to wonder allowed, particularly given your proclivity for
Speaker 4: tweeting out things about public executions, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 4: and the fact that you lied about the group that
Speaker 4: you were in with Charlie Kirk in the forty eight
Speaker 4: hours prior to his assassination. That maybe you're your dog
Speaker 4: whistling a little bit there, but just a ted Now,
Speaker 4: obviously Josh Hammer is denying this and that it is
Speaker 4: not availed threat.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, no.
Speaker 4: He just means that you've got to silence the fox
Speaker 4: in the henhouse, because that's what you do with a
Speaker 4: fox in the henhouse, is you just make sure it
Speaker 4: doesn't talk. Okay, Anyways, it got really funny when people
Speaker 4: start to blast him and he brings up a definition
Speaker 4: of the word neutralized, and he truncates, he cuts it
Speaker 4: off so that you can't see the final one, which
Speaker 4: is basically to kill. It's an allusion to killing. And
Speaker 4: it's like, yeah, dude, we know what you're doing. I
Speaker 4: know exactly what you're doing. And just for the record,
Speaker 4: Josh Hammer is not nobody. I mean, he's basically nobody,
Speaker 4: but he's not nobody in the sense that he's the
Speaker 4: editor in chief at Newsweek, So he's got a high
Speaker 4: prestige job kind of sort of, I mean, whatever prestige
Speaker 4: comes with a magazine at a Dior in chief title
Speaker 4: that no one reads anymore. But regardless, he puts out
Speaker 4: this op ed and essentially what he's he's lamenting or saying,
Speaker 4: is that Tucker Carlson platforming Nick Fuentes is going to
Speaker 4: lead to the demolition of the right, and that their
Speaker 4: instincts are to destroy the right wing or their their intentions.
Speaker 5: Rather, to me, that is what the Tucker wing is
Speaker 5: trying to do. They're they're they're not trying to kind
Speaker 5: of have an inclusive movement, right, They're not trying to
Speaker 5: have to have a marketplace of ideas, kind of free
Speaker 5: for all conversations. That's what That's what they would have
Speaker 5: you believe. That's actually not what they're interested in doing.
Speaker 5: They're trying to burn it all down. They're trying to
Speaker 5: destroy the current iteration of the American right, literally destroy it,
Speaker 5: root and branch and then build something new in its stead.
Speaker 4: I'm going to do something you really didn't expect, and
Speaker 4: that's defend Josh Hammer. He's actually right one regard the
Speaker 4: rest of his diatribes and everything else about his life
Speaker 4: I totally disagree with.
Speaker 2: But he's right about one thing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I do want to destroy the modern iteration of
Speaker 4: the right wing because it is wholly owned and controlled
Speaker 4: by a foreign government, and I don't respect it, appreciate it,
Speaker 4: and I'm no longer willing to permit it. So you're
Speaker 4: right about that. That doesn't mean that I want to
Speaker 4: destroy the country. That doesn't mean that I hate anybody
Speaker 4: foreign or otherwise. It just means that I want to
Speaker 4: have sovereignty. Sovereignty, that's it. I know it's a dirty word,
Speaker 4: but seeing as you know, Israel gets it sovereignty violently,
Speaker 4: So why don't I get sovereignty peacefully?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 2: I can't have that, can.
Speaker 4: I want approximately five hundred and thirty five Thomas Massey's
Speaker 4: and I want approximately zero Mitt Romney's or Lindsey Graham's
Speaker 4: or Randy Fines or Ted Cruz. I don't want any
Speaker 4: of those people in politics because they don't represent me,
Speaker 4: they don't represent America more specifically. So, yeah, I do
Speaker 4: want to destroy that root and branch. That doesn't mean
Speaker 4: I want to destroy the GOP.
Speaker 2: I don't.
Speaker 4: I would love to reform it if that's possible, and
Speaker 4: if it's not, well, then get out the way. That's
Speaker 4: where I'm at with it. That's the fight that we're
Speaker 4: in right now. And I think that that's the main reason,
Speaker 4: if there is one, the very core reason that they
Speaker 4: are so horrified that that Tucker Carlson would deign it
Speaker 4: proper to platform scare quotes someone like Nick Fuent does
Speaker 4: is because they know it's a compelling message.
Speaker 2: It is a compelling message. When inflation was.
Speaker 4: Two percent and the national debt was ten trillion dollars
Speaker 4: and we were actually able to function and have an
Speaker 4: economy that worked a little bit, and people were able
Speaker 4: to pay their rent, afford to buy a home, get married,
Speaker 4: have kids, all of these concerns kind of were subdued
Speaker 4: because at least my life is going okay. Life is
Speaker 4: not going okay. Not for the average person in this country.
Speaker 4: It's not going okay. From drug addiction to the suicide epidemic,
Speaker 4: to mental health issues, to unemployment, to homelessness, to the
Speaker 4: military vets that get back from these wars that are
Speaker 4: fought on behalf of that country, and then they realize
Speaker 4: what they've done and they can't handle it. I mean,
Speaker 4: the list goes on and on.
Speaker 1: You've been getting it wrong for generations. You wrecked my generation.
Speaker 1: How many years have Republicans controlled Congress? How many years
Speaker 1: have Republicans controlled the White House? I was born in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety eight. How many years since then have Republicans
Speaker 1: had power? And what have they done about free trade
Speaker 1: which took all the jobs? Pornography and feminism which made
Speaker 1: marriage impossible? What have they done about the open borders?
Speaker 1: They're literally taking our birthright.
Speaker 4: When the sun was shining, we didn't so much look
Speaker 4: around and say who's taking advantage of us here? But
Speaker 4: when the storm clouds come in, suddenly people go, oh,
Speaker 4: now I want to figure out why it's not sunny anymore.
Speaker 4: And no, I'm not making a weather control old joke,
Speaker 4: even though that would be funny, That's not what I'm doing.
Speaker 4: I'm just saying people are tired, they're fed up. They
Speaker 4: have every right to be. Therefore, they are not going
Speaker 4: to accept business as usual because businesses as usual has
Speaker 4: been brutal for them, and they are expecting that to change.
Speaker 4: The reason that they had so much hope, such high
Speaker 4: hopes for someone like Donald Trump, is because that's what
Speaker 4: he ran on, he ran on closing the border. Can
Speaker 4: you prioritize us, can you put America first? Can you
Speaker 4: make America great again? Can you do those things? That
Speaker 4: was his promise? And they're like, you got my vote,
Speaker 4: that's my guy. And then we're bombing Iran and we're
Speaker 4: funding a bunch of proxy wars and people are like, well,
Speaker 4: this doesn't feel like America First, and they're right.
Speaker 2: And regardless of.
Speaker 4: What happened with Charlie Kirk, which I will get into
Speaker 4: a little bit later, the updates on that front, because
Speaker 4: there are some really interesting tidbits. But regardless of what
Speaker 4: happened with Charlie Kirk, and regardless of where you think
Speaker 4: the dialogue is going now that Charlie Kirk's out of
Speaker 4: the picture, it's not going to change. Nick fuentt Is
Speaker 4: has conquered TPUSA without firing a shot.
Speaker 2: That's the truth.
Speaker 4: His supporters are there in numbers, and for the record,
Speaker 4: most of them probably aren't even his overt supporters. This
Speaker 4: has become a hallmark of TPUSA events over the past
Speaker 4: couple of years. You get these young kids up to
Speaker 4: the microphone, usually men, and they immediately start asking about
Speaker 4: America first, Israel, Gaza, et cetera, et cetera. They're not
Speaker 4: playing around and they're not gonna stop. And as long
Speaker 4: as you keep handing them a microphone, they're going to
Speaker 4: keep asking you these questions.
Speaker 2: So let's get into it. Let's see what these kids
Speaker 2: had to say.
Speaker 5: Dem pandone. Large private corporations such as Pallenteer hoarding data
Speaker 5: caches on US citizens.
Speaker 6: No, I don't condone it. And here's the thing. So
Speaker 6: I get asked about Palenteer a lot, because there's this
Speaker 6: internet meme out there that somehow I am super in
Speaker 6: bed with Palenteer. And here's the thing that I'd say
Speaker 6: about this. Palenteer is a private company. They sometimes do
Speaker 6: a useful service, and sometimes they're going to do things.
Speaker 2: That we don't like.
Speaker 6: You should be demanding that your representatives do two things
Speaker 6: when it comes to Palenteer or when it comes to
Speaker 6: any other technology company. Number One, protecting your data. What's
Speaker 6: going on with artificial intelligence is going to mean that
Speaker 6: there are massive inducements to steal your data, to harvest it,
Speaker 6: and to use it against you to sell digital advertisements.
Speaker 6: That is not what I believe in, and I've been
Speaker 6: fighting against it. Whether it's Palenteer or any other technology company.
Speaker 4: Now, as I said, JD gives a good answer there,
Speaker 4: but he obfuscates. Let me explain, back in the twenty teens,
Speaker 4: when jad Evance was just getting into politics, who do
Speaker 4: you think put him on? Who do you think funded
Speaker 4: his Senate campaign? That would be Peter Teel. Peter Tiel
Speaker 4: gave him five million dollars for that Senate seat. Five million.
Speaker 4: Do you think that comes with no strings attached, just
Speaker 4: based off of ideological alignment?
Speaker 2: I doubt it.
Speaker 4: Do you know who Peter Teel is well, amongst other things,
Speaker 4: he is the co founder of Palenteer. So it is
Speaker 4: not an internet meme to question you, Jade Vance, vice
Speaker 4: President of the United States. It is not an Internet
Speaker 4: meme to go, hey, Bud, seems like you've got a
Speaker 4: whole lot of support coming from Pallenteer, folks. Is there
Speaker 4: a reason for concern there? I would say that there is,
Speaker 4: particularly given that Palenteer has received contracts from the Trump administration.
Speaker 4: So we're going to continue to ask those questions, particularly
Speaker 4: given the fact that Palenteer is a military industrial complex creation.
Speaker 4: I did an entire breakdown episode on this. If you
Speaker 4: want to check it out a couple months ago. Palenteer's
Speaker 4: primary funding source for the first decade of its existence
Speaker 4: was the DoD the CIA in the Intel communities. So
Speaker 4: you don't get much more swampy than that. You don't
Speaker 4: get much more technocratic and horrifying and dystopic than Palenteer.
Speaker 4: And the fact that you have such a cozy relationship
Speaker 4: with Peter Thiel is going to draw these questions.
Speaker 2: That's the nature of the game.
Speaker 4: Kudos to you for how you answered the question, but
Speaker 4: you didn't really answer it fully. You didn't really say yes,
Speaker 4: I get campaign contributions from the co founder of Palanteer.
Speaker 4: You might even get it from Karp, the other co founder.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: But regardless, people are going to wonder if that means
Speaker 4: that there's strings attached, and you're going to have to
Speaker 4: show that you're a real boy, that you have cut
Speaker 4: those strings, and as of now, I don't believe that
Speaker 4: you have. It's good In the next one, which is
Speaker 4: Thomas Massey.
Speaker 7: Endorstic candidate to run against Republican Representative Thomas Massey, who's
Speaker 7: opposed and criticized some of the Trump administration's aims, how
Speaker 7: would you address those who fear that principal disagreement or
Speaker 7: independent thinking is just a courage within the party because
Speaker 7: of how it can be framed as a betrayal instead
Speaker 7: of as internal accountability or an opportunity for debate and negotiation.
Speaker 6: So it's a very good question. And let me say
Speaker 6: this one is hard for me. And the reason it's
Speaker 6: hard for me is because Thomas Massey and I he's
Speaker 6: one of the first people that ever reached out to
Speaker 6: me about my book or about political office. I've known
Speaker 6: Thomas Massey well before I got involved in politics. Thomas's
Speaker 6: wife died a year and a half ago, two years ago,
Speaker 6: it was a little while ago. She died very unexpectedly,
Speaker 6: was a very sweet and kind woman, and I was
Speaker 6: probably one of the first people that called Thomas to
Speaker 6: all from my condolences. I think the problem with Thomas,
Speaker 6: and I've told him this in private and now I
Speaker 6: guess I'll say it in public, is it's one thing
Speaker 6: to disagree with the party on a particular issue. It's
Speaker 6: one thing to take, you know, to take to have
Speaker 6: your independent stand on a number of questions. And by
Speaker 6: the way, some of the stuff where Thomas Massey has
Speaker 6: been independent against the Republican Party.
Speaker 2: I've agreed with him.
Speaker 6: With Thomas and I worked together during twenty twenty three
Speaker 6: where I was trying to stop the limitless flow of
Speaker 6: American money to Ukraine, and Thomas was one of the
Speaker 6: people I was working closest with it. But that's one thing.
Speaker 6: Being independent, having your own opinions is one thing. Voting
Speaker 6: against the party on every single issue, you're eventually going
Speaker 6: to make too many enemies. And that is the problem
Speaker 6: that Thomas has had. It's not one issue, it's not
Speaker 6: three or four issues. It's that every time that we've
Speaker 6: needed Thomas for a vote, he has been completely unwilling.
Speaker 3: To provide it.
Speaker 6: That is why the President of the United States has
Speaker 6: trained desire on Thomas Massey. It's because we can never
Speaker 6: count on him for some of the most difficult votes.
Speaker 6: I wish that that weren't the case. I say that
Speaker 6: as somebody who's known Thomas well before I got into politics.
Speaker 6: But politics is politics, and when you always vote against
Speaker 6: the party, you can't expect the party to actually back yet.
Speaker 4: That's that right there is where you really lose my support,
Speaker 4: my trust, my confidence. The reason I say that is
Speaker 4: because number one, Thomas Massey votes in alignment with the
Speaker 4: GOP over eighty percent of the time, so to say
Speaker 4: you can never count on.
Speaker 2: His vote is a lie.
Speaker 4: But what you're really saying is that when it comes
Speaker 4: to the tougher votes, you can't rely on Thomas Massey
Speaker 4: to cast a vote in your direction. The reason he
Speaker 4: doesn't do that is because he votes in alignment with
Speaker 4: the constitution. And when you try to do things like
Speaker 4: pass a multi trillion dollar stimulus passage during an unconstitutional
Speaker 4: lockdown that doesn't have a recorded vote, which is also
Speaker 4: unconstitutional and it's also totally fiscally insane and not remotely conservative,
Speaker 4: he demands a vote. He goes against Donald Trump and
Speaker 4: draws the ire of Donald Trump as a consequence of that.
Speaker 4: That is why we need more of him, not less.
Speaker 4: And to say that you can't trust him when you
Speaker 4: need him, you want to look in the mirror. You
Speaker 4: got to ask yourself, why can't you rely on him?
Speaker 4: Why are you pushing unconstitutional bills? Why are you doing that?
Speaker 4: And if you're going to pretend as if that makes
Speaker 4: him the problem as opposed to the rest of the swamp,
Speaker 4: you're the problem.
Speaker 2: That's the truth. I'm a Christian man.
Speaker 8: And I'm just confused why that there's this notion that
Speaker 8: we might have ohe Israel something, or that there are
Speaker 8: greatest ally or that we have to support this multi
Speaker 8: hundred billion dollar foreign aid package to Israel to cover this,
Speaker 8: to quote Charlie Kirk, ethnic clensing and Gaza.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so.
Speaker 1: Let me.
Speaker 2: Let me say a few things about this.
Speaker 6: First of all, when the President of the United States says
Speaker 6: America first, that means that he pursues the interests of
Speaker 6: Americans first. That is our entire foreign policy. That doesn't
Speaker 6: mean that you're not going to have alliances, that you're
Speaker 6: not going to work with other countries from time to time.
Speaker 6: And that is what the President believes is that Israel
Speaker 6: sometimes they have similar interests in the United States, and
Speaker 6: we're going to work with them in that case. Sometimes
Speaker 6: they don't have similar interests in the United States. And
Speaker 6: this example, the most recent Gaza peace plan that all
Speaker 6: of us have been working on very hard for the
Speaker 6: past few weeks. The President of the United States could
Speaker 6: only get that piece deal done by actually being willing
Speaker 6: to apply leverage to the state of Israel. So when
Speaker 6: people say that Israel is somehow manipulating or controlling the
Speaker 6: president of the United States. They're not controlling this president
Speaker 6: of the United States, which is one of the reasons
Speaker 6: why I would be able to have some of the
Speaker 6: success that we've had in the Middle East.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna stop it there, because he just gets into
Speaker 4: theological disagreements between Jewish people and Christians after that, and
Speaker 4: it's somewhat interesting but not really pertinent to the topic
Speaker 4: at hand. The major takeaway the really loud statement that
Speaker 4: he made without intending to do so. He said, when
Speaker 4: people say that Israel controls the president of the United States,
Speaker 4: not this president. What's the implication there? He's saying that
Speaker 4: other presidents were maybe all of the presidents were fascinating.
Speaker 2: Isn't it what an.
Speaker 4: Incredible acknowledgment to come from the Vice President of the
Speaker 4: United States. And as you would expect, the Zionis crowd
Speaker 4: is in uproar that he didn't just dismiss it out
Speaker 4: of hand. But he's being somewhat honest. I think that
Speaker 4: the problem is that he's not being all the way honest.
Speaker 4: You don't get a hundred plus million dollars, it's actually
Speaker 4: hundreds of millions of dollars from the Adelson's over the
Speaker 4: past twelve years, and expect there to be no strings attached. Correct,
Speaker 4: we're all adults here. We all understand how business works,
Speaker 4: we all understand how politics works. We all know that
Speaker 4: those bucks come with strings like moving the embassy, funding
Speaker 4: and arming wars, things like that. So you're being honest
Speaker 4: to a level. But then you're defending your guy, and
Speaker 4: you have to. You're the vice president of the United States.
Speaker 4: I expect you to defend Trump. My argument to you
Speaker 4: would be, if you.
Speaker 2: Want me to believe in you.
Speaker 4: You're gonna have to distance yourself somehow. You're gonna have
Speaker 4: to separate yourself. You're gonna have to say what you
Speaker 4: would do differently. And as of now, you're being a
Speaker 4: dutiful soldier, and you're representing yourself as being America first
Speaker 4: and Trump being the same and there being nothing that's
Speaker 4: been done wrong. And Okay, I wish you luck in
Speaker 4: that sales pitch, but I don't think most Americans are
Speaker 4: buying it because America is not being put first. And
Speaker 4: until you do so, expect for these questions to continue,
Speaker 4: Expect for the ire to increase, Expect for the rat
Speaker 4: of good men to arise.
Speaker 3: Alexander Saltz Needson once wrote that there is nothing like
Speaker 3: the wrath of the men who never wanted to be violent,
Speaker 3: once you take away the person that just wanted to
Speaker 3: live a normal life. I just wanted to be left alone.
Speaker 3: I just wanted to be a regular guy. And once
Speaker 3: they push the normal person too far to the point
Speaker 3: where we are no longer able to be that guy,
Speaker 3: They've killed that person. They've killed that part of us.
Speaker 3: To now at the point where we have to be
Speaker 3: living by the rules of the jungle, to protect our family,
Speaker 3: to protect ourselves. The wrath these people are going to
Speaker 3: feel is going to be medieval.
Speaker 2: God, that's a good point.
Speaker 6: Wow.
Speaker 2: I feel like I just took a blue tree.
Speaker 4: And I don't bring this up as a threat. I
Speaker 4: bring it up as a warning. I sense the temperature
Speaker 4: in this country. I know what young men are going through.
Speaker 4: I am one of them, kind of. I'm pretty old
Speaker 4: for a young man, but you know what I mean.
Speaker 4: The economic outlook is dire. The family outlook is not ideal.
Speaker 4: To put it mildly, the freedom outlook isn't exactly ideal either.
Speaker 4: People are tired, people are fed up. People understand that
Speaker 4: they're being taken advantage of, and therefore they will not
Speaker 4: accept business as usual. If you represent yourself to be
Speaker 4: that in any way, you will have no political viability
Speaker 4: moving forward. That's my honest opinion.
Speaker 1: They removed everything, They took everything from us, and now
Speaker 1: they say, if you don't go out and vote for
Speaker 1: more of it, you made us lose. There's no US.
Speaker 1: We are America First. You are the Republican Party. If
Speaker 1: you want America First to be a part of your coalition,
Speaker 1: then you better do.
Speaker 2: Something for us.
Speaker 4: I do not think that you can be elected in
Speaker 4: this country running under the APAC banner, or the Palanteer
Speaker 4: banner for that matter. I think it's going to be
Speaker 4: a just albatross hanging around your neck. You may be
Speaker 4: able to deplatform Nick Fuentes, but you cannot silence his ideas.
Speaker 4: Ideas are not monopolized by him either, and they really
Speaker 4: didn't originate from him. This it's more of a Pat
Speaker 4: Buchanan movement than anything else. Even though Nick likes to
Speaker 4: credit himself with the entirety of the movement, and he's
Speaker 4: done a lot, so I'm not trying to dismiss it entirely.
Speaker 4: And he's certainly done a lot with the young audience,
Speaker 4: but for those that have been around a while, Pat
Speaker 4: Buchanan and Ron Paul, that's the true America first origin story.
Speaker 4: And it started before that, undoubtedly. But I'm just saying,
Speaker 4: in my lifetime, those are the guys and myself, Dave Nick,
Speaker 4: a whole bunch of other people were all in their shadow.
Speaker 4: We're all just trying to carry on that torch and
Speaker 4: see their vision brought to reality. That's what I hope
Speaker 4: to do. That's what I demand we do, and you
Speaker 4: will accept our entry into the GOP to reform it
Speaker 4: or it will be burnt down around you. That's how
Speaker 4: it's going to play out. You cannot stop the young
Speaker 4: generation from having any political say forever. They will grow,
Speaker 4: they will get wealthy, they will get older, and they
Speaker 4: will take power from you. Whether you want to relinquish
Speaker 4: it voluntarily and work alongside them, or if you want
Speaker 4: to be conquered, it's coming. You cannot stop it. I
Speaker 4: promise you that. So as a friendly bit of advice,
Speaker 4: listen to them now or feel them later.
Speaker 2: That's where we're headed.
Speaker 1: What Tucker demonstrated on Monday is that you don't need
Speaker 1: to listen to these people, Tune them out, turn them off,
Speaker 1: take the volume dial and turn it all the way down.
Speaker 1: We're not listening anymore. We don't care. Your book about
Speaker 1: Western civilization in Israel, we don't care.
Speaker 2: We're not reading it.
Speaker 1: You're bitching, you're whining, you're squealing about anti Semitism. Nobody's
Speaker 1: listening anymore, nobody cares, nobody's watching.
Speaker 2: We've tuned you out. We know what you are.
Speaker 1: You don't care about us, you don't care about this country.
Speaker 1: You don't respect this play, you don't respect our ancestors,
Speaker 1: and you don't even worship our god. So why would
Speaker 1: we listen to you for one more second. We don't
Speaker 1: need your permission to have these conversations. We don't need
Speaker 1: your permission to talk to each other. We don't need
Speaker 1: your permission to put America first.
Speaker 4: If you want to understand why Nick foint this has
Speaker 4: become so popular, you only need to watch that clip,
Speaker 4: repeat it over and over if you have to to
Speaker 4: get it through your head. The reason he's popular is
Speaker 4: because he channels the anger of the young men in
Speaker 4: this country. That anger is real. Whether you want to
Speaker 4: call it race, whatever, it doesn't matter. They are fucking furious,
Speaker 4: and they should be. And I, setting all of my
Speaker 4: disagreements with Nick aside, which there are quite a few,
Speaker 4: He's right about this. You have not put America or
Speaker 4: Americans first my entire life. We woke up to it
Speaker 4: quite a while ago, more and more, millions more have
Speaker 4: woken up to it since then. And unless you listen
Speaker 4: to our demands and deliver, you will lose. You will
Speaker 4: pick up a brown fucking ups box and you will
Speaker 4: put your shit into it, and you will go out
Speaker 4: to the U haul and you will take your ass
Speaker 4: back to Virginia or Texas or wherever the fuck you're from,
Speaker 4: because we don't want you there anymore. I don't give
Speaker 4: a shit that you have an R next to your name,
Speaker 4: that you're a member of the GOP, that you pretend
Speaker 4: to be a conservative or a libertarian or not an
Speaker 4: inventionist or fiscally conservative. You're none of those things. You
Speaker 4: represent a country that is not America. It will not
Speaker 4: be accepted anymore. It's over. Get the fuck out. And
Speaker 4: if you lose as a consequence of us not lending
Speaker 4: you our support, good great. I hope it hurts, and
Speaker 4: if it hurts me as a consequence. Fine, I'm already hurt.
Speaker 4: I'm already hurt by your betrayal, So it doesn't matter.
Speaker 4: That's the type of vengeance mentality that he has his
Speaker 4: audience has. I have my audience as we're not gonna
Speaker 4: fucking accept anything less than putting this country first. It
Speaker 4: shouldn't even be a debate. It shouldn't be remotely controversial.
Speaker 4: This is a given. This is a mandatory. This is
Speaker 4: a mandate. You have to deliver it, and if you refuse,
Speaker 4: get the fuck out. We don't need you, we don't
Speaker 4: want you. We don't respect you. You don't respect us.
Speaker 4: We understand each other. Now it's over.
Speaker 2: Move on.
Speaker 4: You will deliver our sovereignty. You will deliver our freedom.
Speaker 4: You will deliver our privacy, our prosperity, our ending of
Speaker 4: the endless wars on behalf of other countries. You will
Speaker 4: stop all of those things, or you will never hold
Speaker 4: power again. You will never get rich off of this graft,
Speaker 4: off of this deep, disgusting corruption. You will never get
Speaker 4: any of those things. This is an ultimatum. You can
Speaker 4: hear us now, or you can feel later. Get fucked.
Speaker 5: You know it, I know it.
Speaker 1: The young people in this country, the next generation. God
Speaker 1: bless them on the left and the right. They know
Speaker 1: that you are full of shit. They're finished with the lies,
Speaker 1: with the humiliation, rituals, insulting our intelligence, the derision and
Speaker 1: the contempt that you hold us in. Everyone knows it,
Speaker 1: and you know as well as anybody that in ten years,
Speaker 1: twenty years, thirty years, there's only going to be more.
Speaker 2: Nick Flentis's