Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twenty third
Speaker 2: of March. You have our Lord, twenty twenty six.
Speaker 3: Take two.
Speaker 2: Well, we think we've got them system ironed out. We
Speaker 2: will see, but we're going to go back to the
Speaker 2: original plan. We're going to pick up where we left
Speaker 2: off with Lindsey Graham's Bloodlust. And there's been an update
Speaker 2: since we stopped the program. It apparently Trump it's always
Speaker 2: chickens out, apparently, and this is a good thing if
Speaker 2: he chickens out on setting the Mid East on fire,
Speaker 2: because we know that's exactly what's going to happen. But
Speaker 2: evidently there has been a retrenchment there according to the Iranians,
Speaker 2: and so if he's not going to start bombing all
Speaker 2: of their infrastructure, then perhaps we can hope that they.
Speaker 3: Won't bomb all of the world's energy infrastructure as well.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a look at what's going on
Speaker 2: with the TSA and ICE, what is happening with the
Speaker 2: pipeline of distractions that Trump has to essentially wag the ducks,
Speaker 2: the documents and right back. Well, everything we see from
Speaker 2: Trump is desperation and improvisation, reaction, not a plan that
Speaker 2: they're executing. There is no plan, and everybody sees that
Speaker 2: now and hopefully the reaction. Perhaps somebody has spoken to
Speaker 2: him about how it's not a good idea to set
Speaker 2: the world's energy supply on fire. So if he decides
Speaker 2: to have a coastal invasion, that's going to happen, But
Speaker 2: that decision hasn't been made yet either. Again, you're not
Speaker 2: going to take the advice of your generals and common
Speaker 2: sense either. He's just going to rush ahead, as they say,
Speaker 2: fools rushing ahead, and we've got a fool for a president. Well,
Speaker 2: you've got the we've got hang on a second, we've
Speaker 2: got this is this is my bad here. We've got
Speaker 2: a lot of Israeli threats that are on the way,
Speaker 2: and we've got we can see what is happening with
Speaker 2: Joe Kent. And it's not a surprise that they're coming
Speaker 2: for him big time because he pushed back against their war.
Speaker 2: Just take a look at this threat to shut down students,
Speaker 2: and again you can see the character of the Israeli
Speaker 2: government in the sense that they have the Hubris to
Speaker 2: demand censorship of speech and destruction of the First Amendment
Speaker 2: in order to protect their political entity.
Speaker 4: If you target Jewish students, your actions will not disappear
Speaker 4: into the darkness. We will shine shine a light on
Speaker 4: you that, thanks to Google and SEO, will follow you
Speaker 4: for the rest of your life. But when you look
Speaker 4: for a job, when you look for a spouse, when
Speaker 4: you look for a nanny, when you look for anything,
Speaker 4: our work will always be documented again thanks to Google
Speaker 4: and SEO.
Speaker 3: This is the embassy of Israel's.
Speaker 4: Or smeared Israel. Excuse Tomas. We pressured CEOs, some resigned,
Speaker 4: many were terminated, but policies were changed, thankfully, from governmental
Speaker 4: to art institutions. Online where anonymous accounts spread violent threats,
Speaker 4: we trace patterns, elevated evidence, and worked with authorities leading
Speaker 4: to arrests from Florida, South Carolina, New York, California, and Texas.
Speaker 4: Going down sadly today stop anti Semitism. I'm proud to
Speaker 4: say runs one of the most robust anti Semitic enforcement
Speaker 4: operations in the United States, monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups,
Speaker 4: and public officials, documenting incidents in real time, and mobilizing
Speaker 4: millions of people of allies violently.
Speaker 3: By our side, Bigger than foreign genocide.
Speaker 4: A future Jewish students can walk across the quad.
Speaker 3: You're going to shut down our speech.
Speaker 4: You're afraid employers understand.
Speaker 3: That you're afraid of the truth is you know what
Speaker 3: you are?
Speaker 4: Activism? It's bigotry and it will cause you to lose
Speaker 4: your job.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, yeah, well, uh, I don't really care. Quite Frankly,
Speaker 2: I'm sick and tired of the Israeli threats. I'm sick
Speaker 2: and tired of them destroying our constitution, taking us to
Speaker 2: war and punishing people. But we got something else that's
Speaker 2: coming down the pipeline, and it's going to be very
Speaker 2: easy for them to do this. You've got Trump with
Speaker 2: his AI initiative, and we've got Marsha Blackburn, the Senator
Speaker 2: from Tennessee who's going to be our next governor with
Speaker 2: no doubt about it. She is so unbelievably popular Republican state.
Speaker 2: And she is so popular when she got into the
Speaker 2: race with all the money, I wonder where she's getting
Speaker 2: the money from.
Speaker 3: Could it be a pack?
Speaker 2: She has her own legislative agenda of how they're going
Speaker 2: to control and shut down the Internet, and I mean
Speaker 2: they're going to shut it down. They're going to go
Speaker 2: after the corporations, and the same tactics that we see
Speaker 2: happening in California that we talked about, saying you will
Speaker 2: get everybody's identity or we will shut you down. You
Speaker 2: will know your customer. What they're doing is they're taking
Speaker 2: all of these they've used for the longest time, Banks
Speaker 2: and anybody that has anything to do with anything financial
Speaker 2: transferring money, any of that stuff. They have for the
Speaker 2: longest time use those as a means of surveillance. They
Speaker 2: know your customer rules and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: Now they're taking that to the Internet. Every aspect of
Speaker 2: the Internet got to get rid of anonymity. And as
Speaker 2: part of Marcia Blackburn's law that she has introduced hasn't
Speaker 2: been passed yet, but as part of that law, and
Speaker 2: it is very very similar to what the Trump administration
Speaker 2: is proposing, they want to make sure that the burden
Speaker 2: of proof and the burden of looking at whoever is.
Speaker 2: It's called content providence and that type of thing. We've
Speaker 2: had the Coalition for Content Providence and Authentication I've talked
Speaker 2: about for a very long time Microsoft, where they said,
Speaker 2: we're going to come together with hardware, software, operating system,
Speaker 2: and the so called established news mainstream media is going
Speaker 2: to determine who is telling the truth and who isn't,
Speaker 2: just like this Israeli embassy wants to do. And then
Speaker 2: they will shut you down. They will mark you and
Speaker 2: shut down your content before you can put it up.
Speaker 2: So this is something that they've been working on for
Speaker 2: a long time. Now you see the Trump administration and
Speaker 2: Republicans like Marsha Blackburn want to shut it down with
Speaker 2: regulations and with laws, and the way they do that
Speaker 2: is to take away Section two thirty immunity, which says
Speaker 2: that you're just a host, you're just a public square
Speaker 2: or whatever, and you don't have any responsibility for the
Speaker 2: content that is published on your site. They want to
Speaker 2: make that content published on their site. They want to
Speaker 2: come after give them legal liability for anything that's put
Speaker 2: on there, so you get sued by a pack or whatever.
Speaker 2: So what are the corporations going to do. Well, We're
Speaker 2: going to err on the side of caution and they
Speaker 2: will premptively shut down anything they think is controversial. That's
Speaker 2: how these apack people are going to operate. And so
Speaker 2: if you say something that we've already seen how this
Speaker 2: works with the COVID mcguffin. We've seen how it works
Speaker 2: really with climate as well, but they really took it
Speaker 2: to the next level when they got the COVID mcguffin.
Speaker 2: You disagree with us, of course, we are science, we
Speaker 2: are objective, and we are right. And if you disagree
Speaker 2: with us, you will be punished. Doctors will be punished,
Speaker 2: nurses will be punished for the COVID stuff. Anybody who
Speaker 2: reports on this stuff will be punished. We've all seen
Speaker 2: how that works. Many of us have been have felt
Speaker 2: that first ten and so that's what they're going to do.
Speaker 2: You either toe the official government line, you applaud the
Speaker 2: federal government, you applaud Israel, or we will shut you
Speaker 2: down with law fair with a threat of lawsuits, or
Speaker 2: with a threat of fines from the federal government. Well,
Speaker 2: Marsha Blackburn is saying, we've got to get rid of
Speaker 2: this patchwork of regulation, folks. That's code that they always use.
Speaker 2: That when they're about to violate the Tenth Amendment, when
Speaker 2: they're about to centralize command and control over some issue
Speaker 2: into the federal government, they always talk about a patchwork
Speaker 2: of regulations. That was what the Constitution was designed for.
Speaker 2: That's what the Tenth Amendment is designed for. It's not
Speaker 2: a bad thing. And so what they do is they say,
Speaker 2: we don't want to have fifty different rules about how
Speaker 2: we operate. We want to have one set of rules.
Speaker 2: So we want this done in Washington where we can
Speaker 2: control the bureaucracy like THEFTY.
Speaker 5: When they say get rid of a patchwork of regulations,
Speaker 5: what they mean is get rid of decentralization of control,
Speaker 5: get rid of separation of powers.
Speaker 2: And what they're saying is I know that I can
Speaker 2: own people like Fauci in the FDA and these other people.
Speaker 2: I can buy them off. So I want all the
Speaker 2: regulations to be in Washington so that I can get
Speaker 2: through and I can shut down my competitors, or I
Speaker 2: can shut down people that disagree with me. That's the
Speaker 2: way this is going to go. This is we've seen
Speaker 2: this for the longest time in terms of using banks
Speaker 2: as a know your customer rule and you know, requiring
Speaker 2: the banks to do that. Now they're going to require
Speaker 2: all the software companies to do this. Whether it's going
Speaker 2: to be a social media site or whether it's going
Speaker 2: to be something like substack, or if it's going to
Speaker 2: be an operating system, they're going to put the burden
Speaker 2: on the corporations, and the corporations will either go out
Speaker 2: of business or they will become spies and enforcers for
Speaker 2: the government. And so we'll have a patchwork of stasis
Speaker 2: what we'll have, Yes, and it.
Speaker 5: Goes a lot farther with the software that isn't run
Speaker 5: by corporations. Stuff that's small scale, open source is largely
Speaker 5: going to be phased out. There was a story of
Speaker 5: the calculator where it's a small team that or maybe
Speaker 5: even just one person that's putting together an open source calculator,
Speaker 5: which matches the definition of an operating system by these laws.
Speaker 5: So they said, all right, this is no longer a
Speaker 5: California legal calculator because they don't want to get involved
Speaker 5: with all the liability of that.
Speaker 2: Well, you can't have a patchwork of businesses. We have
Speaker 2: to have a few businesses that run and own everything.
Speaker 2: And that's the way you do it. What Marsha Blackburn
Speaker 2: is doing, what the Trump White House is doing as well.
Speaker 2: And so one of the things that you had Joe
Speaker 2: can't talk about was. He was talking about how they
Speaker 2: shut down the Epstein investigations. He says, funny how turning
Speaker 2: on Israel prompts an FBI investigation but being mentioned thousands
Speaker 2: of times in the Epstein files does not. And that's
Speaker 2: where we are as a matter of fact. So America
Speaker 2: throws its service members into an unjust war for Israel.
Speaker 2: Is from Brian McGlinchey on his site Stark Realities. Get
Speaker 2: ready to be sued because Israel doesn't like that kind
Speaker 2: of talk. President Trump's decision to join Israel and launching
Speaker 2: a regime change warn Ron has so far cost the
Speaker 2: lives of thirteen service members. More than two hundred have
Speaker 2: been wounded, dozens seriously. Among them are individuals who suffered
Speaker 2: traumatic brain injuries, burns, and shrapnel wounds. One was facing
Speaker 2: potential amputation of an arm or leg. This is just
Speaker 2: to start folks. When they foolishly decide they're going to
Speaker 2: do amphibious landings with the kinds of drones and other
Speaker 2: things like that that we've got, this is basically just
Speaker 2: going to be slaughter. They're victims of a betrayal, perpetrayed
Speaker 2: by their president and of the Joint Chiefs of staff
Speaker 2: who cast them into an unconstitutional war of aggression, packaged
Speaker 2: and lies and initiated to advance the agenda of a
Speaker 2: foreign government, Israel. And so again you've got joint chiefs
Speaker 2: of staff. And when you look at this, understand that
Speaker 2: most of these people who are in this position, of
Speaker 2: these generals, and we've got I forget how many times,
Speaker 2: it's something like five or six times in number of generals,
Speaker 2: maybe more that we had during all of World War Two.
Speaker 2: It has become a very political position. And these people
Speaker 2: are very different than people like Colonel McGregor. These people
Speaker 2: are toties. They will do whatever the present tells them
Speaker 2: to do because they want advance US casualties comprise a
Speaker 2: small subset of the total bloodshed, and executing this unjust war,
Speaker 2: Americans have collectively inflicted far more death and dismemberment than
Speaker 2: they have endured. Teaming up of the Israeli counterparts to
Speaker 2: kill more than three thousand Iranians, including one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty school girls, mostly between the ages of seven and twelve,
Speaker 2: and whose school was destroyed by Tomahawk christ missiles. Other
Speaker 2: wars very start as a matter of fact. As one
Speaker 2: person pointed out, Trump is upset because he found out
Speaker 2: that Iran can put up a better fight than a
Speaker 2: thirteen year old girl can. That was the girl that
Speaker 2: was released in the Trump Epstein documents. You're thirteen years
Speaker 2: old and he raped and beat her. And this is
Speaker 2: the guy. This is the guy that if you join
Speaker 2: the military, this is the guy that you signed up
Speaker 2: to follow. I just I can't believe what this country
Speaker 2: has become. I'm so disgusted by it. Anyway, Operation Epstein
Speaker 2: Fury combat waged under the US flag rarely has anything
Speaker 2: to do with American security. Person writing this says, I
Speaker 2: say this as a former Army Reserve and listee and
Speaker 2: a regular Army officer. Anyone thinking of starting or extending
Speaker 2: a military career should understand that their government may send
Speaker 2: them to be killed, maimed, or psychologically damaged and send
Speaker 2: them to slaughter innocent people abroad, so long as it
Speaker 2: helps those in power remain in the good graces of
Speaker 2: the extremists who rule Israel, and they're powerful collaborators inside
Speaker 2: the United States. Yeah, it is. You need to understand this.
Speaker 2: I understood this as a teenager during Vietnam. I just
Speaker 2: couldn't understand it when I had some friends who joined
Speaker 2: the military. It's like, why would you go to fight
Speaker 2: for these people? They don't care a whit about you,
Speaker 2: and they're so unbelievably corrupt. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: if you want to look at corruption, and you want
Speaker 2: to look at Pete Hegseth as a walking example of this,
Speaker 2: and he knows who the people are that he's recruiting. Right,
Speaker 2: this is what the Pentagon is putting out as a
Speaker 2: recruitment campaign video. It's basically video games and football clips
Speaker 2: that are intermixed with aeriel hits blowing things up. McGregor
Speaker 2: got it right when he said, every time you hear
Speaker 2: Pete Heggseth talk, he sounds like a wannabe high school
Speaker 2: football coach.
Speaker 3: And that's what they've got here.
Speaker 2: They've got football hits even as the bombs go off, Right,
Speaker 2: what's this?
Speaker 3: Look at this? Yeah, HeiG Seth is going after males.
Speaker 2: He's not going after the females. Bidened it. Well, you
Speaker 2: get the idea, mindless, stupid, idiotic. It's not a game, folks,
Speaker 2: It really isn't. In spite of the fact that hegg
Speaker 2: Seth thinks that it is.
Speaker 3: So the.
Speaker 5: I mean, his other commercial was a literal game. They
Speaker 5: had a bunch of video game stuff from You innersplaced
Speaker 5: with the bomb footage.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, And that's the way this guy sees it,
Speaker 3: and hethings.
Speaker 2: I guess he grew up playing video games and tattooed
Speaker 2: and thinking about the Crusades. And that's another example. I
Speaker 2: think the Crusades were a big black eye on so
Speaker 2: called Christendom. That's when Western civilization got it wrong, went
Speaker 2: out initiate a war of aggression for territory, saying we're
Speaker 2: doing it for God. Right, That's exactly what Pete haig
Speaker 2: Seth is doing. He's got all these Crusader tattoos on,
Speaker 2: and he thinks that the phrase blessed be the Lord
Speaker 2: who has trained my hands for warfare and my fingers
Speaker 2: for battle. He thinks that's about literally going out and
Speaker 2: killing other people. That's not at all what it's about.
Speaker 2: As a Christian, he should know better. The people who
Speaker 2: are mentoring him should know better and should call him
Speaker 2: out on that. Where is Doug Wilson with all this stuff?
Speaker 2: Doesn't he realize that as Christians, we don't fight against
Speaker 2: flesh and blood. We fight against principal and powers and
Speaker 2: spiritual wickedness and high places. As he is a good
Speaker 2: example of this. We fight against deception and lies, we
Speaker 2: fight against the efforts to control our minds. That's where
Speaker 2: the battle is. The spiritual battle is much more important
Speaker 2: than the physical battle. Pete haig Seth doesn't understand that.
Speaker 2: Of course, neither does Yahoo. But haig Seth ought to
Speaker 2: understand that if he is a professing Christian, so he
Speaker 2: doesn't like to take questions about war crimes, but these
Speaker 2: questions are going to be following him listening to this.
Speaker 2: You had a reporter start to ask him a question
Speaker 2: about his war crimes, and he's getting a long, long
Speaker 2: list of war crimes, and he immediately just deflects to
Speaker 2: somebody else.
Speaker 6: The president will look at what makes the most sense
Speaker 6: going forward.
Speaker 7: I appreciate that question.
Speaker 3: Yes, right here.
Speaker 8: Crime is that the a policy of the US military
Speaker 8: out thank.
Speaker 2: You, secretary.
Speaker 3: Sense can't ask me about war crimes? Yeah, it is.
Speaker 2: The Department of War Crime. Tis the department of war
Speaker 2: crimes under war peat. Under international law, a war of
Speaker 2: aggression is considered a supreme war crime unto itself. So
Speaker 2: we can talk about going back and machine gunning people
Speaker 2: who are shipwrecked. That is obviously a war crime. We
Speaker 2: could also talk about war of aggressions, where you initiate it.
Speaker 2: You know, when Hitler invades another country or when Putin
Speaker 2: invades another country's wrong. It's also wrong when Trump and
Speaker 2: war Pete do it as well. Everybody knows that the
Speaker 2: initiator is the one who starts the war, is the
Speaker 2: aggressor and the one who is in the wrong. So
Speaker 2: this one was launched on false premises. Contrary to the
Speaker 2: US Israeli narrative. Number one, Iran was not developing a
Speaker 2: nuclear weapon. We saw this from inspectors, we saw from
Speaker 2: what the Omani brought guy brought back. He said, hey,
Speaker 2: I don't think that these two real state guys who
Speaker 2: are a Zionists, I don't think that Whitkoff and Jared
Speaker 2: Kushner are going to portray this as reasonable. So he
Speaker 2: flew back to the United States to say, look look
Speaker 2: at what they've agreed to. They've agreed to take this
Speaker 2: stuff out and have inspectors to look at it. They
Speaker 2: didn't want to hear it. They wanted their war of
Speaker 2: aggression because that's what Natanyahu wanted. The Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 2: Tulsa Gabber this week testified that Iran had made quote
Speaker 2: no efforts unquote to rebuild this enrichment capacity after it
Speaker 2: was devastated by last summer's bombing. Note that in two
Speaker 2: thousand and five, the Supreme Leader, who is now dead,
Speaker 2: Ali Kamani, issued a fatwah and he asserted that the
Speaker 2: production this is quote the production, the stockpiling, and the
Speaker 2: use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam, and that
Speaker 2: the Islamic Republic of Iran shall never acquire these weapons.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: They collaborated to kill him. Nevertheless, now that he's gone,
Speaker 2: they have a different spiritual leader, and quite frankly, when
Speaker 2: you look at nuclear proliferation, the policies of Trump and
Speaker 2: Iran are going to be creating nuclear proliferation. The lesson
Speaker 2: from this attack is that the US and Israel cannot
Speaker 2: be appeased. They want your destruction, pure and simple. And
Speaker 2: everybody else. As Trump is going around the world threatening
Speaker 2: everybody around the world, whether it's Greenland or Cuba, you
Speaker 2: name it, everybody else that he's threatening is looking at
Speaker 2: this and saying, well, you know, we need to have
Speaker 2: nuclear weapons as well. That seems to be the only
Speaker 2: thing that deters. This madman is nuclear weapons.
Speaker 3: Number two.
Speaker 2: Iran did not stray from the twenty fifteen nuclear deal
Speaker 2: until Trump did. When Trump withdrew from the United States
Speaker 2: from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Iran was in
Speaker 2: full compliance. Among other things, it required Iran to eliminate
Speaker 2: its medium enriched uranium, it's cash of low enriched uranium
Speaker 2: by ninety eight percent, limit future enrichment to three percent,
Speaker 2: agree to even more external monitoring than it was already
Speaker 2: submitting to, and render its heavy water reactor worthless by
Speaker 2: filling it with concrete. After Trump withdrew the United States
Speaker 2: from the agreement in twenty eighteen in his first term
Speaker 2: and reinstated sanctions, Iran waited a year, but then began
Speaker 2: straying from its own commitments, using elevated enrichment as a
Speaker 2: lover to push for a new agreement. Iran says that
Speaker 2: the JCPOA permitted it to suspend its commitments after Trump's withdrawal,
Speaker 2: citing language governing, material breaches and significant non performance. So
Speaker 2: I was like, you withdrew from the treaty first, and
Speaker 2: we're doing this and doing it as a negotiating chip.
Speaker 2: Number three Iran wasn't the problematic negotiating partner. Well, you
Speaker 2: can all see the perfidy, the treachery of these real
Speaker 2: estate dealers like Witkoff and Kushner had intimate ties to
Speaker 2: Israeli government and Prime Minister Benjamin Nata Who. Remember when
Speaker 2: there was this back and forth about a degree disagreement
Speaker 2: about what Israel and the US are going to do,
Speaker 2: and people say, oh, maybe there's a split between them.
Speaker 2: They said, no, no, there's no split. You have Kushner
Speaker 2: and Witkoff talk every day to Netanya Who. These guys
Speaker 2: who are never confirmed, who have a made up position,
Speaker 2: a special invoice, they speak every day and get a
Speaker 2: briefing from Netna Who and from Massad traders. They're traders,
Speaker 2: just like Jonathan Pollard. Witcoff is known as a staunch
Speaker 2: supporter of Israel. He counts pro Israel megadonner Miriam Adelson
Speaker 2: as a quote dear friend. He carries a custom pager
Speaker 2: that was gifted to him by Netanya Who and senior
Speaker 2: Masad officials in reference to the operation in which Israel
Speaker 2: remotely detonated thousands of pagers that allegedly belonged to Hasbealah officials. Kushner, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: has been steeped in pro Israel community his entire life.
Speaker 2: He counts netnya who as a family friend, as a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, a family friend who would come and
Speaker 2: visit them when he was young, a family friend who
Speaker 2: would come and visit them and sleep in Jared's bed.
Speaker 2: I think it is a damning association to bb to
Speaker 2: be affiliated with that family. Many people look at it
Speaker 2: and say, well, you know, it's the other way around.
Speaker 2: And of course, who is the worst character when you
Speaker 2: look at Jared Kushner's father. What he did was a
Speaker 2: he was had allegations and charges against him for fraud.
Speaker 2: His brother in law, Jared's uncle, was somebody who was
Speaker 2: going to be testifying against him, perhaps to save himself
Speaker 2: as a deal that he worked out. And so Jared
Speaker 2: kushn father decided to set up his brother in law
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein style. That's the way these people think. And
Speaker 2: so what he did was he arranged for a prostitute
Speaker 2: to seduce him and to film it, just like Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: Then blackmailed him and they exposed that, and it was
Speaker 2: Chris Christie who was the prosecutor. That's why Jared Kushner
Speaker 2: always came after Chris Christie. See it's Chris Christie's problem
Speaker 2: for prosecuting this Jeffrey Epstein fraudster. But yeah, he set
Speaker 2: up a honeypot prostitute. Film didn't blackmail the guy. Now,
Speaker 2: Trump gave Jared Kushner's father, who did that set up
Speaker 2: the honeypot, filmed and blackmailed his brother in law. He
Speaker 2: gave him a full pardon in twenty twenty, and then
Speaker 2: he began his second term by making this criminal the
Speaker 2: ambassador to France. Is it any wonder that they hate
Speaker 2: us in France? At least they hate Trump. Hopefully they
Speaker 2: realize that not everybody in America supports Trump. After learning
Speaker 2: that Whitcoff was grossly mischaracterizing Iran's stance, if not outright
Speaker 2: lying about it, that was when Oman's foreign minister, who
Speaker 2: had been the mediator in the discussions, made an urgent
Speaker 2: trip to Washington. He said, we regarded Witkoff and Kushner
Speaker 2: as Israeli assets that dragged a president into a war
Speaker 2: that he wanted to get out of. Well, I'm not
Speaker 2: so sure about that. I think the president is an
Speaker 2: Israeli asset. Frankly, Manchurian candidate or maybe the Manachevit's candidate.
Speaker 7: I don't know.
Speaker 2: Iran's ballistic missile program wasn't built for offense. The White
Speaker 2: House claimed that Iran was building a conventional shield that
Speaker 2: would enable future nuclear blackmail. But anyone who's been paying
Speaker 2: attention could see the Twelve Day War when Iran effectively
Speaker 2: used cutting EDGEA ballistic missiles to retaliate against Israeli aggression.
Speaker 2: They have not been the aggressor throughout all of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Everything has been in response. So Israel or US will
Speaker 2: escalate and they'll say, if you continue to escalate, we're
Speaker 2: going to do such and such. They continue to escalate,
Speaker 2: so then they do what they warned they were going
Speaker 2: to do. And that's where we are right now in
Speaker 2: terms of the tit for tat back and forth over infrastructure.
Speaker 2: And if they escalate that over infrastructure, Iran has promised
Speaker 2: them it will follow through that they will basically set
Speaker 2: the Mid East on fire. And that's exactly what Israel
Speaker 2: would like, because Israel wants to take over the entire
Speaker 2: Middle East, which means you burn it down, you bankrupt it,
Speaker 2: then it's easier for you to take it over. That
Speaker 2: use is consistent with US intelligence characterization of Iran's military
Speaker 2: posture as primarily defensive. Iran's conventional military strategy is primarily
Speaker 2: based on de terrence and the ability to retaliate against
Speaker 2: an attacker. Number five. Iran has not been waging war
Speaker 2: on the United States for forty seven years. I've talked
Speaker 2: about that for the longest time. To the contrary, the
Speaker 2: hostilities have been overwhelmingly originated in Washington. Any survey of
Speaker 2: history should go back seventy three years. That's what I've
Speaker 2: been saying to nineteen fifty three. We overthrew their elected
Speaker 2: government and put in a king and the CIA Massad
Speaker 2: trained his secret police, brutal murderers, torturers to shut down
Speaker 2: any political opposition. The Shaw Persian for king. The ledgers
Speaker 2: should also include US support for Rock's eight year war
Speaker 2: on Iran in the nineteen eighties, and that was the
Speaker 2: context for the nineteen eighty three bombing of troops that
Speaker 2: were there. And David Stockman has talked about this. David
Speaker 2: Stockman was in on the Security Group meetings that were
Speaker 2: being held in the Reagan administration. He saw what was
Speaker 2: happening there and knows why that happened and why Reagan
Speaker 2: pulled out because we had been supporting Saddam Hussein against
Speaker 2: Iran and we were escalating it with troops, and so
Speaker 2: they decided at that point, We're not going to get
Speaker 2: involved in this back and forth. The central line in
Speaker 2: the so called forty seven Year War narrative blames Iran
Speaker 2: for killing thousands of Americans in Iraq by supposedly directing
Speaker 2: Shia militias to target Americans and equipping them with improvised
Speaker 2: explosive devices IEDs, and a concise treatment on his substack.
Speaker 2: Former Marine officer Matthew Ho, who led counter Ied efforts
Speaker 2: in Iraq, dismantled that well entrenched narrative. His key points
Speaker 2: where the great majority of American service members killed in
Speaker 2: Iraq died at the hands of Sunni resistance groups. You
Speaker 2: understand Sunni is Iraq, you know, that's their strain of
Speaker 2: Islam predominantly. And so there's Sunnis and then there's the Shiahs,
Speaker 2: which are in Iran just as different as the Wahabbyists
Speaker 2: in Saudi Arabia are from people. So it's not this
Speaker 2: monolithic thing. And the political groups are aligned with this
Speaker 2: as well. So that is also different, Iran provided some
Speaker 2: support to the Shia militias, but Ho calls out the
Speaker 2: hypocrisy of US officials, saying that Iran alone has blood
Speaker 2: on its hands, penning such blame on US aligned Gulf
Speaker 2: monarchies that backed the Sunni militias in Iraq, and finally here,
Speaker 2: Iran isn't the world's leading sponsor of terrorism. Top contenders
Speaker 2: would include Saudi Arabia and yes, the United States and Israel.
Speaker 2: In terms of using fear and threats and violence to
Speaker 2: achieve social or political goals, that's what terrorism is. We
Speaker 2: do that all the time, as we've seen in the
Speaker 2: case of Cuba and others. You've got American secretaries of
Speaker 2: state that have full discretion to slap the label of
Speaker 2: state sponsor of terror on. They can put it on,
Speaker 2: they can take it off. There is no process, there
Speaker 2: is no burden of proof required. It's whatever they wish
Speaker 2: it to be. Well, BB had his appearance, and.
Speaker 3: I don't know why.
Speaker 2: I look at this now, I haven't seen anybody come
Speaker 2: up with any It appears that he has now finally
Speaker 2: appeared in public, which is really kind of strange. I
Speaker 2: really was thinking, I don't understand why They put out
Speaker 2: so many obvious AI fakes unless they wanted to invite speculation.
Speaker 2: But he appeared in public and what he had to
Speaker 2: say was despicable.
Speaker 9: If you want proof that Iran endangerous the entire world,
Speaker 9: the last forty eight hours have given it. In the
Speaker 9: last forty eight hours, Iran targeted a civilian area. They're
Speaker 9: doing that as a mass murder weapon. Luckily no one
Speaker 9: was killed, but that's due to luck, not their intention.
Speaker 9: Their intention is to murders civilians.
Speaker 3: Well, he would not whitney.
Speaker 9: They are using. They fired what he did in Gaza, Jerusalem,
Speaker 9: right next to the holy sites of the three Monotheistic
Speaker 9: face the Western Wall, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher
Speaker 9: and the Alaxa Mosque, and by dint of a miracle,
Speaker 9: again none of them were hurt, but they were targeting
Speaker 9: the holy sites of the three major Monotheistic religions. Third,
Speaker 9: they fired an intercontinental ballistic missile on the Edgo Garcia.
Speaker 9: That's four thousand kilometers. I've been warning all the time
Speaker 9: they have now the capacity to reach deep into Europe.
Speaker 9: They already have fired on European country Cyprus. They are
Speaker 9: putting everyone in their sites and fourth, they're stopping a
Speaker 9: maritime international route energy route and trying to blackmail the
Speaker 9: entire world. What more proof do you need that this
Speaker 9: regime that threatens the entire world has to be stopped.
Speaker 2: I can think of two regimes that threaten the entire
Speaker 2: world as well. But while he's talking about that, people
Speaker 2: were quick to point out the hypocrisy of talking about
Speaker 2: focusing on civilian targets. Israel has been doing that in
Speaker 2: spades for years. As a matter of fact, here's a
Speaker 2: video put out by Israel that is boasting about what
Speaker 2: they have done to Gaza. Look at how they have
Speaker 2: destroyed Gaza as they fly over it. I mean they
Speaker 2: literally have bombed it to nothing. And this is a
Speaker 2: good example, quite frankly, of why we cannot when these
Speaker 2: wars and regime change by aerial bombing alone. We've had
Speaker 2: this type of destruction happened in North Korea during the
Speaker 2: Korean War.
Speaker 3: We had a.
Speaker 2: Curse LeMay built his reputation on his bombing campaigns, and
Speaker 2: basically he did this kind of devastation to North Korea
Speaker 2: as well. We lost that war, and of course when
Speaker 2: you look at what happened with Japan, you had the
Speaker 2: fire bombing of Tokyo was worse than the nuclear weapons
Speaker 2: of Hiroshima and Nakasaki, and yet it did not bring
Speaker 2: them into submission. It was not even the nuclear weapons
Speaker 2: by themselves. It was also the Russian invasion of Manchuria
Speaker 2: that had a lot to do with that. And so
Speaker 2: Bib is very upset about the fact that they would
Speaker 2: actually retaliate and bomb the civilian cities of places that
Speaker 2: you know supposed to only go the other direction. Right,
Speaker 2: they are fair game to be bombed, but do not
Speaker 2: turn around and bomb Israel.
Speaker 3: If anyone needed.
Speaker 9: An explanation of why Iran is the enemy of civilization
Speaker 9: and the enemy.
Speaker 3: We need an explanation for what you did in Gaza.
Speaker 9: You got in the last forty eight hours. In the
Speaker 9: last forty eight hours, they fired what terror weapon on civilians,
Speaker 9: on children. There's a children's nursery here, there's an old men,
Speaker 9: old person's home here, civilians, families, What about the girls' school?
Speaker 9: And often the couple times which are forbidden by international law.
Speaker 3: You use white phosphorus.
Speaker 9: Is that they fired on Jerusalem right next to the
Speaker 9: holy places. They sent ballistic missiles that could have destroyed
Speaker 9: the Church of the holy.
Speaker 2: Well, you get the idea. He's basically repeating his line
Speaker 2: multiple places. And again I look at this and it's like,
Speaker 2: I don't understand why they put out those obviously fake
Speaker 2: AI videos, But evidently the guy is not in a
Speaker 2: coma and alive. I haven't seen anybody pull back and
Speaker 2: offer any evidence of why they don't believe that was
Speaker 2: him there. When we look at Gaza, this is again
Speaker 2: you want to talk about destruction, Take a look at Gaza,
Speaker 2: and we have the propaganda that is rolling out. This
Speaker 2: is from the Israeli government. I first saw this and
Speaker 2: I said, wait a minute, it's going to show damage
Speaker 2: in Israel. He's going to go to jail for five years.
Speaker 10: Look at this. This is the face of evil. This
Speaker 10: is the Iranian regim ballistic terror. This can now happen
Speaker 10: in Rome, in Vienna, in Berlin, in Paris. The only
Speaker 10: question is whether or not the Iranian regime will push
Speaker 10: the button. And we know the Iranian regime and we
Speaker 10: know that they already pushed it.
Speaker 2: And we know that Israel has pushed the button, and
Speaker 2: we know that the US is pushed a button. This
Speaker 2: is why you don't start wars. Innocent people die all
Speaker 2: the time. It destroys as this whole broken window fallacy,
Speaker 2: and people like Lindsey Graham on the sidelines rubbing their
Speaker 2: hands in glee, saying, we've got to make a lot
Speaker 2: of money out of this. This is why war is horrible,
Speaker 2: that's why starting one is a war crime. But they
Speaker 2: don't care about that aspect of it. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, they are starting a war and bombing civilian
Speaker 2: populations in Lebanon as the Israelis are complaining about what
Speaker 2: is happening to them. This is what it looks like
Speaker 2: in Lebanon as they're blowing up bridges, leaving people stranded
Speaker 2: who can't get to the hospital because they've isolated them.
Speaker 2: Now with the blown bridges. One person who's victorious and
Speaker 2: I don't know how to pronounce that last word there
Speaker 2: says I don't care about temples. Yeah, I don't either,
Speaker 2: And I don't care about a piece of land. There
Speaker 2: isn't any piece of land. There isn't any line on
Speaker 2: a map that's worth killing people for the US list.
Speaker 5: Of I just thought it was funny when he was
Speaker 5: saying the most holy places for Christianity. I didn't know
Speaker 5: Christianity had a especially holy place.
Speaker 2: Well, real Christianity doesn't. Real Christianity understands that we are
Speaker 2: the temple of God, that we are the living stones,
Speaker 2: that Christ is the foundation, not Israel, and certainly not
Speaker 2: a political entity that is out there. So the US
Speaker 2: list of terrorist organizations is at this point really laughable
Speaker 2: because we take groups off willy nilly based on whether
Speaker 2: we like them politically or not. And so what do
Speaker 2: they want in Iran? Well, what the Israelis want to
Speaker 2: do is to break Iran apart. They want to make
Speaker 2: it look like Syria. That is from John Meersheimer, which
Speaker 2: is absolutely right, and he's made the point. He said,
Speaker 2: why is it that we have so much money being
Speaker 2: given to politicians by APAK, Well, it's because what they
Speaker 2: want our government to do is not in our interest.
Speaker 2: You wouldn't have to pay them to do these things
Speaker 2: if it was in the interest of Americans. But since
Speaker 2: it's not in the interest of Americans, you have all
Speaker 2: this bribery that's going on by APAC because it's contrary
Speaker 2: to the interests of America. Have to pay them money
Speaker 2: to be traders to us. So means of achieving an
Speaker 2: expansionist dream of greater Israel, and I think this lebens
Speaker 2: ram as a Hitler called it, I think that is
Speaker 2: what is essentially behind the Yeah, we're going to continue
Speaker 2: to go on a little bit longer because we missed
Speaker 2: like the first hour and fifteen minutes of the show,
Speaker 2: so we're going to get in at least two hours
Speaker 2: of the show. I've got a lot that I want
Speaker 2: to say today, and we had a lot of technical issues.
Speaker 2: It appears they've been worked out. Thank you guys for
Speaker 2: doing that. They worked real hard on getting that done,
Speaker 2: and we got a bit by a couple of hardware
Speaker 2: software changes that came in. But I think really what
Speaker 2: is happening is they want to expand their territory. That's
Speaker 2: usually why you have these wars of aggression. It's usually
Speaker 2: why you've got people like Ginghis Khan, that Bibi Netanya
Speaker 2: who thinks is so great, so much greater than Jesus.
Speaker 2: He said, it's because Genghis Khan want territory. He had
Speaker 2: the largest contiguous empire that's ever been in terms of
Speaker 2: land mass, you know, the British Empire. Son never set
Speaker 2: on it, but it's all these different disconnected areas. He
Speaker 2: had this massive, contiguous empire because he was invading and
Speaker 2: killing people brutally. Is that the kind of person you
Speaker 2: want to look up to. Is that the kind of
Speaker 2: person that really advances civilization? I don't think.
Speaker 5: So.
Speaker 2: We don't set our calendars by Genghis Khan's birth. We
Speaker 2: try to do that with the Lord Jesus Christ. But
Speaker 2: now with him and when we look at the Germans
Speaker 2: and there they needed more room to grow for their
Speaker 2: master race. Same thing that's happening with the Chosen people
Speaker 2: of Israel. They need more room. They need all of
Speaker 2: the Middle East, and they would like to burn it
Speaker 2: down so they can take it. The suffering that springs
Speaker 2: from this war of aggression isn't combined to the United States, Israel,
Speaker 2: Iran and Gulf states hosting US bases. People around the
Speaker 2: world are already coping with growing scarcity and increasing costs
Speaker 2: of oil and gas. This Pandora's box of harms. The
Speaker 2: world's supply of medicine is in growing jeopardy. Nearly half
Speaker 2: of US generic prescriptions originate in India, which relies on
Speaker 2: the straight of hor moves for the arrival of key
Speaker 2: inputs and drug manufacturing. The price US corn farmers are
Speaker 2: paying for fertilizer has jumped upwards of twenty percent. And
Speaker 2: this article here is not talking about what's going happened
Speaker 2: to the advanced semiconductor industry when they lose their supply
Speaker 2: of helium. If the war continues and the straight of
Speaker 2: horror mooves remains closed, it's certain to result in global
Speaker 2: health catastrophe, starvation, malnutrition, devastating economic depression, surging crime, and
Speaker 2: social unrest.
Speaker 3: Folks.
Speaker 2: This is what the Fourth Turning is really about. And
Speaker 2: that's what I said, is that Donald Trump is a
Speaker 2: one man fourth turning. Global depression, global war, These things
Speaker 2: go hand in hand. And he was doing some of
Speaker 2: this for the world economic for him in his first term.
Speaker 2: That's what was happening with the lockstep lockdown that was
Speaker 2: happening around the world. This, however, there's not so much
Speaker 2: the UN and these globalist health public health organizations, But
Speaker 2: this is pretty much Donald Trump, the Manchurian candidate for Israel,
Speaker 2: who is running this stuff through. Never forget that we're
Speaker 2: going to take a quick break and we will be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 7: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
Speaker 11: them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, and again, thank you for joining us. And we
Speaker 2: are going to put together the show in a proper
Speaker 2: format here. And because we had we'd go about five
Speaker 2: minutes and the thing would crash. We had all kinds
Speaker 2: of issues in terms of things that were happening with
Speaker 2: audio feedback and duplication and other things like that. So
Speaker 2: we're going to put this together. We're going to keep
Speaker 2: running this for a bit longer here. I'm not sure
Speaker 2: how long we're going to go until I get finished
Speaker 2: with some of the things that I really wanted to
Speaker 2: cover today. Hour long that takes, so we may have
Speaker 2: more than two hours show. He may have more than
Speaker 2: a three hour show. I don't know, but stick around.
Speaker 2: We're going to put that together. And it's been something
Speaker 2: of a mess today, but we're going to keep going
Speaker 2: as long as the system doesn't start crashing again on us.
Speaker 2: I want to talk a little bit more about Netnaho
Speaker 2: and his love for Genghis Kong and his hatred for
Speaker 2: Jesus Christ. Now he calls that fake news, I say
Speaker 2: it isn't. I say that it showed us exactly where
Speaker 2: this guy is coming from. Look, if you want a
Speaker 2: comparison of a world leader and what Netna who wants
Speaker 2: to be. He wants to be ginghis khan. He doesn't
Speaker 2: want to follow the Lord Jesus Christ. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, when you look at this, it really is
Speaker 2: the Synagogue of Satan. He's secular, he is atheistic, and
Speaker 2: it is when he starts using these terms like Amelek.
Speaker 2: He's talking about genocide and he's trying to piggyback onto
Speaker 2: real Judaism, the Old Testament, just like Pete Hegseth is
Speaker 2: trying to piggyback himself off onto real Christianity, but doing
Speaker 2: a pretty poor job of it and getting rid of
Speaker 2: the ethics that are involved there. Yeah, he is not Netanya,
Speaker 2: who is not even Jewish folks, if you want to
Speaker 2: define Judaism as followers, he doesn't follow the Mosaic law.
Speaker 3: He doesn't.
Speaker 2: You know, these people who look at all this stuff,
Speaker 2: they only look at the promise of land. Like I
Speaker 2: said before about Ben Shapiro when he was asked point blank,
Speaker 2: well do you think Moses part of the Red Sea?
Speaker 3: For I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't believe that. I don't believe in miracles like that.
Speaker 2: I just know though, that the promise of the land
Speaker 2: from God is for me. That's all I care about, right,
Speaker 2: I don't care about the rest of this stuff. And again,
Speaker 2: ginghis Kanan is pretty much forgotten after two thousand years,
Speaker 2: except for those who are full of ambition and greed
Speaker 2: and those who want to be like him. By the way,
Speaker 2: you know, Genghis Khan can't give you eternal life. Just
Speaker 2: to point out a simple comparison here between him and
Speaker 2: the Lord Jesus Christ. Know why he marks time by
Speaker 2: Genghis Khan. The Bible embraces people who trust in God,
Speaker 2: not in their chariots or horses. That was the list
Speaker 2: the lesson over and over and over again that had
Speaker 2: to be learned by the people of Israel in the
Speaker 2: Old Testament. They constantly were putting their trust in their
Speaker 2: military prowess, or in their leaders or whatever. That's why
Speaker 2: God raised up people like David to fight Golias. That's
Speaker 2: why he always kept lecturing them. He says, is my
Speaker 2: hand too short to deliver you? And he tells Samuel,
Speaker 2: they have not rejected you, they have rejected me. And
Speaker 2: they continue to do that. So again, you look at
Speaker 2: somebody who trusted trust in their chariots and horses, somebody
Speaker 2: who sees goodness as weakness. What does that tell you?
Speaker 2: Tells you that this guy could very easily do the
Speaker 2: exactly the types of things that we've seen him do.
Speaker 2: So it's ought to be a wake up call where
Speaker 2: he's so called Christian Zionist. And again, but to understand
Speaker 2: what a contradicting oxymoron that term is. So he says
Speaker 2: that it's fake news, that it was taken out of context,
Speaker 2: and yet when you see what he's doing, it is
Speaker 2: really his aspirations are the same as Genghis Kanng. No
Speaker 2: wonder he pulls this guy out. So the Japanese, there's
Speaker 2: a good example in terms of learning a lesson. I
Speaker 2: think the Japanese, at least some of them have learned
Speaker 2: the lesson from World War Two. We called it a
Speaker 2: day of infamy, and it was. And I don't care
Speaker 2: regardless of I mean, I do care what FDR did
Speaker 2: in order to passively aggressively lure them into making the
Speaker 2: first move, but they still made the first move. That's
Speaker 2: like somebody who kills his wife saying, yeah, but she
Speaker 2: was nagging me and doing this and that. That still
Speaker 2: doesn't justify the escalation. It still doesn't justify the over
Speaker 2: the top violence is not justified. So it was a
Speaker 2: day of infamy. It was a sneak attack, it was treachery.
Speaker 2: And so as I played for you last week, you
Speaker 2: had Donald Trump was talking when he had the Japanese
Speaker 2: primester woman come in. He was asked a question by
Speaker 2: the Japanese press, why didn't you tell us anything about this?
Speaker 2: She just sprung this on everybody.
Speaker 12: Japan and he was a very good friend. But one question,
Speaker 12: why didn't you tell us allies in Europe and Asia
Speaker 12: like Japan about the war before taking you out? So
Speaker 12: we are very confused about Japanese sea wealth.
Speaker 3: So one thing you don't want to signal too much,
Speaker 3: you know.
Speaker 2: One thing, Trump doesn't have any allies and we didn't
Speaker 2: just don't want any.
Speaker 7: Because we wanted surprise. Who knows better about surprise than Japan.
Speaker 3: Okay, why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?
Speaker 2: Okay, you can see how uncomfortable she has. I'm going
Speaker 2: to play for her.
Speaker 3: Comments could be do you believe in surprise?
Speaker 2: Well, the first thing is the Japanese reporter was saying,
Speaker 2: why do you talk to your allies about this? Well,
Speaker 2: because Trump doesn't see any allies. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: he treats his allies worse than he treats his enemies. Now,
Speaker 2: Japan didn't tell America about that because America is not
Speaker 2: their ally. America was their enemy and al I'd shown
Speaker 2: it that way. It still does not excuse what they did.
Speaker 2: But here's what the Japanese Prime Minister say.
Speaker 13: I will never set foot in the United States again.
Speaker 13: This trip to the White House was the most humiliating
Speaker 13: meeting over my political career as the Prime Minister of Japan.
Speaker 13: I traveled to the United States with full sincerity to
Speaker 13: meet with our ally, only to be met with the
Speaker 13: cities of disrespect through undismissive treatments. Upon my arrival at
Speaker 13: the White House, they did not even prepare an official
Speaker 13: welcome ceremony. I was made to enter discreetly through a
Speaker 13: side entrance, as if we were nothing more than in
Speaker 13: significant visitors. What infuriated me even more was that Trump
Speaker 13: openly joked about the Pearl Harbor attack right in front
Speaker 13: of me, showing complete disregard for how embarrassed I would be.
Speaker 13: During the subsequent talks. Trump formerly demanded that we must
Speaker 13: cooperate with the United States in its military operations against Iran.
Speaker 13: He even used Japan's crude oil supply as leverage to
Speaker 13: course Japan into getting involved in an irrelevant war. In
Speaker 13: this so called Arai meeting, I saw no negotiational respect whatsoever,
Speaker 13: only one sided humiliation and demands I will never set
Speaker 13: foot in the United States again.
Speaker 2: Well, she's learned a lesson. She's learned a lesson about Trump.
Speaker 2: She's learned a lesson about Pearl Harbor. For example, she
Speaker 2: said he knew how embarrassed and shamed that she would
Speaker 2: be right. Whereas Trump's shame, he has none. He has
Speaker 2: no embarrassment, He has no shame for what he did
Speaker 2: with children, He has no shame for the wars that
Speaker 2: he has started. The man has no shame for anything
Speaker 2: that he's done, including that you should be ashamed of
Speaker 2: Pearl Harbor, and she was embarrassed about it, and he
Speaker 2: should be a shame for what he has done as well.
Speaker 3: And that's the key thing.
Speaker 2: You know, when Natanya who talks about this, he says, well,
Speaker 2: it's not enough to be moral, it's not enough to
Speaker 2: be just it's not enough to be right. Yes, it is.
Speaker 2: You are absolutely wrong about that. That is what we
Speaker 2: try to do. That is what we aspire to do.
Speaker 2: Nobody does that perfectly. He should know from Isaiah. No,
Speaker 2: there's none who's righteous, not one. Everybody has turned to
Speaker 2: their own way, followed their own things, done what they
Speaker 2: feel like is right in their own eyes. But to
Speaker 2: give up on all this and say well, we don't
Speaker 2: want to have any morality, we don't want to have
Speaker 2: any justice, we don't want to do what's right. That
Speaker 2: is Nettna who telling you what he is about, what
Speaker 2: his government is about. You know, That's why, By the way,
Speaker 2: everybody has turned their own way, and nobody can brag
Speaker 2: about being moral or right. That's why you need Christ.
Speaker 2: That's why everybody needs Christ. Because there is no one
Speaker 2: who has righteous And even though these people are Abraham's descendants,
Speaker 2: it is Christ through whom God blesses all nations, not
Speaker 2: through Israel, and not through people who tell you that
Speaker 2: you don't need justice, you don't need to support what
Speaker 2: is good and right. Who has contempt for that? And
Speaker 2: eOne talks about it. He says, history proves that Jesus
Speaker 2: Christ has no advantage over Genghis come that aggression will
Speaker 2: overcome moderation. Well, I would say the history has taught
Speaker 2: us exactly the opposite. I think Christ has had a far,
Speaker 2: far greater impact on history. You look at Genghism, he
Speaker 2: admires him because he got more land than anybody else did. Well,
Speaker 2: good for him, whipped you doo. Take it to the
Speaker 2: grave and tell that to Jesus when you see him.
Speaker 2: So you trust your chariots and horses, and trust your
Speaker 2: politicians too, because that's what they trust in. He says,
Speaker 2: Let me be clear, I did not denigrate Jesus Christ
Speaker 2: at my news conference this morning. Well, what he did
Speaker 2: was he denigrated the pursuit of justice, the pursuit of
Speaker 2: doing what's right and what is good. That's what he detegrated,
Speaker 2: and he's been denigrating that his entire time as a
Speaker 2: leader of Israel. As a matter of fact, he was
Speaker 2: the guy who was pushing the COVID shots from Pfizer
Speaker 2: on his own people and offering his own people as
Speaker 2: lab rats. What a disgusting leader, Nettna, who is He
Speaker 2: embraces this machiavellium power. He says that Mike makes right
Speaker 2: and that evil is going to triumph if it's strong enough. No,
Speaker 2: evil will never triumph because God is not evil. Because
Speaker 2: God will triumph. So yeah, he did detigrade. The question is,
Speaker 2: and it's asking the Old Testament, why into the nation's
Speaker 2: rage against the Lord and his anointed, his messiah is Christ. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they imagine a vain thing. They think that it matters.
Speaker 2: What does it gain a man to win all of
Speaker 2: Manchuria and lose his own soul?
Speaker 3: I would say that.
Speaker 2: To Genghis Kan, and I would say that to bibing
Speaker 2: at Yahu. And so the question is who do you trust?
Speaker 2: Do you trust in yourself, do you trust in your
Speaker 2: prepping ability? Do you trust your government? Or do you
Speaker 2: trust God who created the universe. And that's why we
Speaker 2: ask him. Why do they imagine such a vain thing?
Speaker 2: It is the worst example of atheism, I think. And
Speaker 2: so with all of this happening, yet I called out
Speaker 2: Dan Bongino because the Epstein stuff. He says, you're a
Speaker 2: pedophile protector. Dan Bongino didn't like it, and his uh,
Speaker 2: his the protector of the pedophile protector. His security guard
Speaker 2: tells a guy right away, you're about to be trespassed
Speaker 2: out of here. I've not used it. I've not seen
Speaker 2: that as a verb used that way. So, yeah, you're
Speaker 2: going to trespass against him with your speech.
Speaker 3: We're gonna throw you out.
Speaker 2: We got people all over the place, every aspect of
Speaker 2: government in every country right now hates free speech, wants
Speaker 2: to punish free speech, wants to control speech.
Speaker 3: And don't be a coward, Dan, You're gonna be trustpassed
Speaker 3: for the property. Okay, this might be. You might feel
Speaker 3: like you're God's watching you, man, but we reap what
Speaker 3: we saw. God's watching us go all out against the
Speaker 3: deep state. Don't be afraid. Don't be afraid of Satan, man.
Speaker 3: I'm telling you about you're a big I'm ready. What
Speaker 3: do you do, I'm ready to be in Congress. I'm ready.
Speaker 3: I play on it. I'm not afraid of Hillary. I'm not.
Speaker 2: Why don't you do something? He puts it back on him.
Speaker 2: He doesn't doesn't say that, and then I was talking
Speaker 2: over it. But you can hear the guy that's in
Speaker 2: the program with Ivan Reichlan, a constitutional attorney former Army Greenbery.
Speaker 2: He starts calling him a pedophile protector as well. It
Speaker 2: wasn't a lot of love for Dan Bongino after he
Speaker 2: got off of that TV program Seven hundred Club.
Speaker 5: It's less that he's afraid of them and more than
Speaker 5: he's working for them, though.
Speaker 2: He's afraid not to get the money right that's going
Speaker 2: to come out of this.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: That's the way the Trump people, I guess, are all
Speaker 2: instinctively respond. They're asked appointed question about something they're doing
Speaker 2: that's wrong, or something that they should have done that
Speaker 2: they didn't do. Their response is to attack you personally.
Speaker 2: So why don't you do something about it?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 2: And he said I'm going to run for Congress and anything,
Speaker 2: so anyway, try to flip it back on him. This
Speaker 2: is just like BONDI does no answer attack. That's what
Speaker 2: the guy they followed does, Donald Trump, as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, So i've bean re Reichlan escalated the situation further,
Speaker 2: launching a barrage vacusations at Bongino, calling him a pedophile
Speaker 2: protector as well. Ranklin responded with profanity laced insult, shouting
Speaker 2: I was a cop for nine years, you are a
Speaker 2: pedophile protector, before adding further explication at Bongino before he
Speaker 2: was escorted away.
Speaker 3: He was trespassed out of there.
Speaker 2: Say, I guess, and so as Netna, who says, this
Speaker 2: is doctor Simon Gottick, says, Netna, who says, if anyone
Speaker 2: need an explanation as to why Iran is the enemy
Speaker 2: of civilizations, I play those clips were you he was
Speaker 2: going around seeing that multiple times, and the enemy and
Speaker 2: the danger to the entire world.
Speaker 3: You got it.
Speaker 2: In the past forty eight hours. They fired a terror
Speaker 2: weapon at civilians, They fired a terror weapon on children,
Speaker 2: and so as Simon says, the Simon says, he says,
Speaker 2: Iran hits back once and suddenly it's horror, while Gaza's
Speaker 2: kids were just collateral damage. Give me a break. And
Speaker 2: again that is what we previously saw there. And again
Speaker 2: when you look at all of the AI stuff, that
Speaker 2: was really strange. And again there was the for exactly
Speaker 2: the amount of time that somebody would be sitting shiva
Speaker 2: for someone who died in the Jewish religion. Netna, who's
Speaker 2: son was completely silent, very active on social media otherwise.
Speaker 2: And then there's also this the wing of Zion Netna,
Speaker 2: who's kind of his air force one if you will,
Speaker 2: that flew on the day that he was alleged to
Speaker 2: have been injured. That flew to Germany, and it is
Speaker 2: still in Germany, has been there for many days, and
Speaker 2: German people are putting pictures up of it still there
Speaker 2: and asking what's going on with it. So I'm not
Speaker 2: really sure about it. But I haven't seen anybody come
Speaker 2: up with an avatar like explanation for him going to
Speaker 2: these sites and engaging with people on the streets after
Speaker 2: these attacks. But what does that tell us about what
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is saying? Donald Trump says, and Pete Heegsas says,
Speaker 2: we've taken out their ability to launch missiles. We have
Speaker 2: complete air superiority. And then Risey's saying that an F
Speaker 2: thirty five state of the art is shut down, shot down,
Speaker 2: I should say, and we have a dozen of these
Speaker 2: Reaper drones have been shot down. And then they escalate
Speaker 2: the amount of missiles that they're sending. Now the missile
Speaker 2: that went to die Diego, Garcia, which is about four
Speaker 2: thousand kilometers, about twice the range of what they thought
Speaker 2: was a maximum range for Iran, Ron said they didn't
Speaker 2: fire that missile. Well, they didn't fire it. Who did
Speaker 2: are they lying? Certainly they could lie for the most part,
Speaker 2: though we've seen most of the lives of incoming from
Speaker 2: the US isn't really side. And we know they're lying
Speaker 2: because even with a fog of war, if somebody says, well,
Speaker 2: they don't have the ability to launch anymore, and yet
Speaker 2: you see what is happening in Tel Aviv and other
Speaker 2: places we have. Let's see if I can show you
Speaker 2: the picture here of tel Aviv that is there, Yeah, here,
Speaker 2: it is right here. They say they don't have the
Speaker 2: capability launch missiles, and then you see this happening, massive
Speaker 2: destruction in tel Aviv, massive destruction in Demona and a rod.
Speaker 2: We got three cities that took massive hits from Iranian missiles,
Speaker 2: while we're told that they have taken this out. So
Speaker 2: something is not quite right on our side in terms
Speaker 2: of what we're being told. So did Israel fire a
Speaker 2: missile at Diego Garcia? Was it kind of a false
Speaker 2: flag attack? Was it kind of a USS liberty attack?
Speaker 2: Because that is what they're using this for in terms
Speaker 2: of saying, well, see, Aron is such a bigger threat
Speaker 2: than you thought. So who knows what's happening with that?
Speaker 2: Under Biden, the CIA had warned that traditional motherhood and
Speaker 2: homemaking were signs of white extremism, and we need to
Speaker 2: understand as we see these this memo leaked, we need
Speaker 2: to understand that feminism and drugs and so many things
Speaker 2: originated with the CIA. They have been not only the
Speaker 2: enemy of peace and getting the United States into one
Speaker 2: scrape after the other, but they've also been instrumental in
Speaker 2: terms of trying to destroy the fabric of our society,
Speaker 2: the family. The CIA says intelligence assessment reveals top to
Speaker 2: bottom bias at Biden's CIA, an agency with critical intelligence responsibilities,
Speaker 2: was spending its resources targeting women promoting motherhood because they
Speaker 2: have been promoting feminism and the rest of the stif
Speaker 2: for a very long time. From their inception, we assessed
Speaker 2: the female members have been emerging as key players of
Speaker 2: the trans national white, racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist movement,
Speaker 2: taking on diverse roles to advance white goals, including the
Speaker 2: white ram ve view of traditional motherhood, and successfully participating
Speaker 2: in newer roles in propaganda and recruitment. They are anti family,
Speaker 2: they're anti anti white, and that is what they have done,
Speaker 2: just as they have pushed drugs, coups, assassinations, and wars.
Speaker 2: Why do we continue to have the CIA. Can we
Speaker 2: clean out this nest of vipers in the United States?
Speaker 2: That really is the true deep state, they said they
Speaker 2: the Biden administration of CIA was writing documents that were
Speaker 2: attacking people who lauded motherhood and homemaking as women's most
Speaker 2: important responsibility. It used to be that the government, the
Speaker 2: politicians are made fun of because you could always count
Speaker 2: on them for supporting mom and apple Pie. Well, they
Speaker 2: don't support mom anymore. I don't know about apple Pie.
Speaker 2: I guess he'll be coming for that next.
Speaker 5: Uh you, bug Pie is going to be the next one.
Speaker 3: That's right. No apples, just bugs.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no families and z bug Pie eat.
Speaker 2: Ze bugs, not the apple, eat the worm out of
Speaker 2: the apple. Well, I'll tell you what. The CIA is
Speaker 2: the worm in the apple of America. We will be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 7: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 11: mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen
Speaker 11: wherever you go.
Speaker 2: Well, certainly we can hope that maybe there will be
Speaker 2: a move back away from the mutually assured destruction of
Speaker 2: global energy supplies as well as critical infrastructure. At some point,
Speaker 2: you got to pull back away from this and hopefully
Speaker 2: there'll be some adults in a room somewhere with Trump
Speaker 2: who can reason this guy off of the ledge that
Speaker 2: he's about to jump off and take the rest of
Speaker 2: us with him. Thank you to South Coast Painter, Thank
Speaker 2: you very much, gifted five subscriptions to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Appreciate that very much. Appreciate that. That's about twenty five dollars.
Speaker 2: Landset and c JP Rumble says, but Maga thinks she's
Speaker 2: in love. They said that she loved him. That's the
Speaker 2: Japanese Prime minister. Yeah, well, she set the record straight,
Speaker 2: didn't she. The most important thing about it is that
Speaker 2: she has she is embarrassed about what Japan has done,
Speaker 2: and you know Trump is boasting he can do the
Speaker 2: same thing. He's not embarrassed at all. The man has
Speaker 2: absolutely no shame, and we have seen that in his
Speaker 2: personal relationships with his wives. We have seen that in
Speaker 2: his relationship with people who work for him, and we've
Speaker 2: seen that in his relationship to the Constitution and to
Speaker 2: Maga itself.
Speaker 3: The man has no shame.
Speaker 2: Toilet Goy said, there's no more mature statesman, just immature fools. Absolutely,
Speaker 2: I agree with that. As a matter of fact. Speaking
Speaker 2: of immature fools, let's talk a little bit about Pete Hegseth.
Speaker 2: He has invoked the divine purpose to justify military might,
Speaker 2: and he's got the left absolutely apoplectic. They don't like
Speaker 2: it when you mention Christ and you talk about God.
Speaker 2: They don't like that at all. And they really hate
Speaker 2: it when you connect it with war. And I hate
Speaker 2: it when they connect it with war as well. So
Speaker 2: they said Pete has embued US military actions with a
Speaker 2: Christian moral underpinning that suggest that they are divinely sanctioned.
Speaker 2: There is no moral underpinning for this war and the
Speaker 2: way that he's conducting it, the Christian underpinning that the
Speaker 2: Christian understanding of war is it's only undertaken to preserve
Speaker 2: innocent life. It's only undertaken to stop aggression, to stop
Speaker 2: people like Pete Hegseath, to stop people like Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: That's why you have wars. And the entire world understands that.
Speaker 2: You know, there's certain things that for the most part,
Speaker 2: we talk about it. The libertarians to talk about it
Speaker 2: as natural law. They would make a distinction between law
Speaker 2: and what they called nomos, which would be like, you know, well,
Speaker 2: here's the speed limit that you can go on this
Speaker 2: particular street. Something that is arbitrary there that not everybody
Speaker 2: would understand or necessarily even agree with. But when it
Speaker 2: comes to natural law, that would be things like don't steal,
Speaker 2: don't kill, those types of things. Almost all cultures and
Speaker 2: countries have embraced natural law. We instinctively understand that we
Speaker 2: all have that much enlightenment from God that we understand
Speaker 2: basic morality. Now, you do have societies that have slipped
Speaker 2: into cannibalism, and you can sever that conscience that you have,
Speaker 2: and you can do that. Multiple generations can do that.
Speaker 2: But for the most part, people understand with natural law
Speaker 2: what is basically right and wrong. And I got to
Speaker 2: say that Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump certainly don't understand
Speaker 2: the very basics, even of fundamental morality and natural law.
Speaker 2: A military might is not a thing that God values,
Speaker 2: and we shouldn't be valuing that. Especially. The issues are
Speaker 2: how are you going to use it? Are you going
Speaker 2: to use it for evil? You're going to use it
Speaker 2: for good? And what are you going to trust? Are
Speaker 2: you going to put your trust in those chariots? And
Speaker 2: horses and those other weapons that you hear him boast
Speaker 2: about all the time. Are you going to tell everybody
Speaker 2: that God is on our side? You when to couch
Speaker 2: it in those kinds of terms. That should be a
Speaker 2: red flag for anybody. God is not on our side.
Speaker 2: The question is are we on God's side? That was
Speaker 2: the question that Joshua put to the people. It was
Speaker 2: on the Lord's side, come over here. And so that
Speaker 2: is the reality. God is not on the side of
Speaker 2: the Jews. God is not on the side of the Americans.
Speaker 2: The question is are the Jews and the Americans on
Speaker 2: God's side? That is the true issue. So again and
Speaker 2: again we keep seeing this idea that and it's a
Speaker 2: false idea given to us, that Judaism is the foundation
Speaker 2: of Western civilization and the foundation of Christ and of Christianity.
Speaker 2: That is absolutely not true. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: you have net Yahoo has said, let's see here, it
Speaker 2: is right here. Where is it? Trying to find I
Speaker 2: can't find the clip here. I get too many clips.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to find BB saying the Jews created the USA.
Speaker 2: Here it is right here.
Speaker 9: I said, Mike that we are fighting today the battle
Speaker 9: that the Maccabee's fought. They fought for the survival of
Speaker 9: the Jewish people and the Jewish faith against an enemy
Speaker 9: that wanted to extinguish us, wipe us out from the
Speaker 9: face of the earth. We were fighting our battle, but
Speaker 9: we were also fighting the battle of civilization, because our
Speaker 9: civilization is based on the Judeo Christian tradition. And if
Speaker 9: the Maccabees had failed, there'd be no Judaism, there would
Speaker 9: be no Judeo Christian civilization.
Speaker 2: What is that civilization if you refuse to make a
Speaker 2: distinction between good and evil, if you pursue power rather
Speaker 2: than pursuing good and what is right? That is the
Speaker 2: real question, and that's the question that he needs to
Speaker 2: ask himself. And I got to say, the foundation of
Speaker 2: America is Christian, it is not Judaism. There's a movie
Speaker 2: that's coming out about George Whitfield and the Great Awakening
Speaker 2: that was really the foundation of America, and that will
Speaker 2: be the foundation of America if America is not destroyed,
Speaker 2: it will be what reforms America. I'll just give you
Speaker 2: a little bit of the trailer of this movie about
Speaker 2: the life of George Whitfield, because it was connected to
Speaker 2: the Great awakening a period of time where people turned
Speaker 2: back to God in repentance in America.
Speaker 5: All right, so.
Speaker 7: Sleeper owe John Benjamin Franklin.
Speaker 3: Your brother said he could use your help at his
Speaker 3: print shop.
Speaker 11: Do you have my blessing?
Speaker 3: Can you do good things?
Speaker 7: Pop great things?
Speaker 10: From the SS.
Speaker 11: Through the George Whitfield, you will be an extraordinary preacher.
Speaker 7: Remember the sulks of your power.
Speaker 3: You don't believe the stories from London are true.
Speaker 9: I am doubting Whitfield's claim that he can be heard
Speaker 9: and understood by so many without evidence, I won't believe it.
Speaker 7: Let us proclaim freedom to the captives.
Speaker 5: Whom the Son sets free is free?
Speaker 3: And have you ever heard a voice like that?
Speaker 7: But blast from heaven?
Speaker 11: Benjamin Franklin For everyone, Whitfield, partnering with me would guarantee.
Speaker 14: The maximum benefit to your cause.
Speaker 7: A match made in heaven or just a deal made
Speaker 7: in a print shop.
Speaker 6: General George Washington, Today we stand in an even darker valley.
Speaker 6: The rival of this country must be our chief concern.
Speaker 7: This constitution cannot fail.
Speaker 14: We cannot let the sun set on this nation. You
Speaker 14: are lighting a powder cake, my friend.
Speaker 7: When you follow him, you are lad by love.
Speaker 3: Why can't I get throw to you?
Speaker 7: I choose evidence of of faith. Stop trying to change me.
Speaker 5: You have promoted the greatest awakening these colonies have ever seen.
Speaker 3: You are the lightning bolt, George, I am.
Speaker 7: Just the lightning rock.
Speaker 5: And who is the saucepan you?
Speaker 7: Let them receive your gift of salvation.
Speaker 11: Untiny Candle illuminates a thousand.
Speaker 2: All right, O, sleeper away John, I show that because
Speaker 2: we have to take back the history of this country,
Speaker 2: we have to take back what is true and right
Speaker 2: from the people, from the elk of people like Pete
Speaker 2: Hegseth and Bbnut and Yahoo. We had a country that
Speaker 2: was founded on the Christian values of the Gospel, the
Speaker 2: good news of the Lord Jesus Christ. That is the
Speaker 2: good news that changes lives. That's the good news that
Speaker 2: changes nations. And it was not about grabbing as much
Speaker 2: land as we could. In spite of what people want
Speaker 2: to make this about. That was true reality of that.
Speaker 2: The fact is that God blesses those who follow Him,
Speaker 2: not those who follow their own way. And so as
Speaker 2: all this is happening, you've got Pete Hegseth, who is.
Speaker 3: The crusader.
Speaker 2: He keeps telling everybody, well, you know, thank a crusader
Speaker 2: for civilization, and you've got net and Yaju says, thank
Speaker 2: a thank Judaism for your civilization. I say, we thank
Speaker 2: God for our civilization, and we give him the credit
Speaker 2: for that, because he's the one who civilizes. It's not
Speaker 2: the people are out for a land to grab. The
Speaker 2: crusaders were following. They're looking for land. They were not
Speaker 2: trying to spread the gospel. Take a look at what
Speaker 2: happened with the Mayflower and why people said they came.
Speaker 2: It wasn't just for material gain, it wasn't just for
Speaker 2: their own was also to propagate the gospel of the
Speaker 2: Lord Jesus Christ. Where do we get this idea that
Speaker 2: all men are created equal and doubt by their creator,
Speaker 2: with certain inalienable rights, Not a master race, not a
Speaker 2: chosen people based on hereditary issues, but the fact that
Speaker 2: all men are created equal. That is a Christian understanding
Speaker 2: that did not come from Judaism, that did not come
Speaker 2: from the Crusades. So again, that is the fight that
Speaker 2: we're in, not the nonsense that's being offered to you
Speaker 2: by the likes of war Pete Hegseth or by Net,
Speaker 2: Yahoo and As a matter of fact, we should be
Speaker 2: reminded that there are a lot of Jews who are
Speaker 2: not Zionists as well.
Speaker 15: Zionists purposefully want to involve all Jews in their wars
Speaker 15: for their benefits. That Jews and the state of Israel
Speaker 15: are be viewed as one, it is miss presentation by
Speaker 15: Zionists that exposed Jews as targets for no fault of
Speaker 15: our own. Yet Zionists with Netiao at the helm will
Speaker 15: deflect accountability by saying it's about Jews and anti Semitism,
Speaker 15: but not about this Israeli government. In truths, Zionists never
Speaker 15: cared for the safety or security of Jews. It's all
Speaker 15: about their disgraceful national distagendas.
Speaker 2: And that's what the Christian nationalists are doing to Christians
Speaker 2: as well, what the Zionists are doing to the ultra Orthodox.
Speaker 2: You know, they hate us for our freedoms, do they now?
Speaker 2: They hate us because we have a murderous government. That's
Speaker 2: why people hate Americans and people. The hatred towards Jews
Speaker 2: is because of what the Jewish government is doing, and
Speaker 2: they try to put it on the people there. Hegseeth
Speaker 2: has found no shortage of ways to bring his strand
Speaker 2: of conservative evangelicalism into the Pentagon. He hosts monthly Christian
Speaker 2: worship services for employees. You might want to step up
Speaker 2: the frequency of that so that you could actually have
Speaker 2: some time to read the Bible. That would be an improvement,
Speaker 2: I think for your monthly meetings.
Speaker 5: Maybe he should go sometime. Was that, Maybe he should
Speaker 5: attend one of these.
Speaker 3: Maybe they should just open up the Bible again.
Speaker 2: We get this kind of nonsense that really bothered me
Speaker 2: when I heard it. You know, when he quotes in
Speaker 2: terms of you know, blessed be the Lord who trains
Speaker 2: my hands for warfare and my fingers for battle, continues
Speaker 2: on and says, the Lord is my rock, you know,
Speaker 2: my protector, right, not your chariots and horses. But we
Speaker 2: also understand as Christians that the true fight is the
Speaker 2: one that is spiritual, the supernatural fight. The supernatural fight
Speaker 2: is above the natural, and that is what God is
Speaker 2: training us for. We're going to be fighting against things
Speaker 2: like pride and hatred and greed and politics and land
Speaker 2: and flags and borders, lines on the maps. Haig Seth
Speaker 2: has a history of defending the Crusades, and I say
Speaker 2: that the Crusades don't need to be defended.
Speaker 3: They need to.
Speaker 2: Be seen as were. Christianity went off the rails. The
Speaker 2: Crusades were not about spreading the Gospel. It was about
Speaker 2: taking land from people and the name of Christ. And
Speaker 2: that's not what Christ is about. Christ even made it
Speaker 2: very clear he said, my kingdom is not of this world.
Speaker 2: So what is the basis then, for the Crusades? What
Speaker 2: is the basis for all of this support of Israel
Speaker 2: by Christian Zionists. He wrote that those who enjoy Western
Speaker 2: civilizations Hesseth should thank a crusader. He has tattoos on
Speaker 2: his arms. Deis volt God wills it. Again, this is
Speaker 2: him saying that he has the divine right to kill
Speaker 2: people and take their land because it's the will of
Speaker 2: God for him to do that. He is a false prophet.
Speaker 2: God did not will the crusades. His kingdom is not
Speaker 2: of this world. He said, if it was, my conservants
Speaker 2: would fight. And he did not come to create a
Speaker 2: massive empire like Genghis Khan. This is a misreading, and
Speaker 2: this is the thing that is at the heart I
Speaker 2: think of the misunderstanding about Zionism and dispensationalism. They'll always say, well,
Speaker 2: we take the Bible literally, well, the Bible is to
Speaker 2: be taken literally. I mean, I believe that God separated
Speaker 2: the Red Sea for the Jews and brought them in
Speaker 2: the Promised Land. But that was a picture of a
Speaker 2: greater truth, a greater reality for us. And it really
Speaker 2: is about whether or not we follow God and put
Speaker 2: our faith in him. You know, when they misread this,
Speaker 2: what is happening with the Zionists is they're looking at
Speaker 2: this just like the Oh, we got to get Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: You know, We've got to do this for God. You know,
Speaker 2: we got to take this land for God and put
Speaker 2: our flag up on it. That is absolutely not what
Speaker 2: God is about. God is not about the wars of
Speaker 2: aggression to take these types of things. And when you
Speaker 2: look at what's going on in Venezuela and Cuba, they
Speaker 2: are equally unjust to what is happening in Iran. Trump
Speaker 2: and Pete are thugs, they're bullies, their war criminals, they're murderers,
Speaker 2: and they murder their own people as well, he says.
Speaker 2: One heg Seth critic, a scholar at Georgetown, says the
Speaker 2: US voluntarily going to war against a Muslim country with
Speaker 2: the military under the leadership of Pete Hegseth is exactly
Speaker 2: the kind of scenario that people like me were warning
Speaker 2: about before the election and throughout the appointment process. Well, again,
Speaker 2: here's the danger the Christians should see whenever you merge
Speaker 2: church and state, which you wind up with a state.
Speaker 2: The merger, the politicization of our belief in God is
Speaker 2: the worst kind of corruption, institutional corruption that you could
Speaker 2: possibly have. You always have to fight the institutional corruption,
Speaker 2: even of our own churches, but when you bring in
Speaker 2: these corrupt politicians, you're going to wind up with just
Speaker 2: corrupt politics. And you can see that in Hegseth, and
Speaker 2: you can see it in Trump. When asked whether Hexs
Speaker 2: views the war in Iran and religious terms, a Defense
Speaker 2: Department spokesperson, pointing to a recent CBS interview in which
Speaker 2: Hegxath seemed to confirm as such, he said, we're fighting
Speaker 2: a We're fighting religious fanatics who seek a nuclear capability
Speaker 2: in order for some religious armageddon. He said, from my perspective, obviously,
Speaker 2: I'm a man of faith who encourages our troops to
Speaker 2: lean into their faith and to rely on God and
Speaker 2: to kill people who have not attacked you.
Speaker 3: I would ask, right, is.
Speaker 2: That really how you lean into that, lean into your faith,
Speaker 2: how you rely on God. Generations of evangelicals have been
Speaker 2: influenced by their own version of Armageddon. And again we
Speaker 2: had a very good comment. I forget who made this comment,
Speaker 2: but it was on Friday. We had a listener who
Speaker 2: made the comment, and he said, when you look at
Speaker 2: Zionism and when you look at what has happened in Judaism,
Speaker 2: they have gone from Torah, you know, the five books
Speaker 2: of the Bible, and they they don't like the prophetic
Speaker 2: books as much as they would Torah, the Law of Moses,
Speaker 2: but they went from that to rabbinical commentary. It allowed
Speaker 2: them to have a veneer of God without actually following God.
Speaker 2: They could make up their own rules. And we've had
Speaker 2: the same type of thing. He drew the analogy between
Speaker 2: that and dispensationalism Schofield Bible, where you get a commentary
Speaker 2: that is basically changing everything but doing it with an
Speaker 2: air of saying, well, this is really the Bible, when
Speaker 2: in actuality you're not following the Bible. You're following a
Speaker 2: system of commentaries, just like the Talmud is rabbinic commentary.
Speaker 2: So is a Scofield Bible might give you a clue
Speaker 2: as to where the Scofield Bible came from. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, generations of evangelicals have been influenced by
Speaker 2: their own version of Armageddon. Zionist pastor John Hage says, Oh, prophetically,
Speaker 2: we're right on Q again. This has become their God.
Speaker 2: It is what they worship. It is kind of a divination,
Speaker 2: is the way. I see what they're doing. If we
Speaker 2: get so caught up in prophecy and yet they don't
Speaker 2: want to look at the prophecies that have been fulfilled
Speaker 2: in Christ, that is the most amazing thing to me.
Speaker 2: They'll come back and say, well, you know people who
Speaker 2: we're dispensation. So we follow the Bible literally. Well, I
Speaker 2: think following the Bible literally means following it as it
Speaker 2: was written. When you look at most of the prophecies
Speaker 2: that are in the Bible that are talking about prophetic prophety,
Speaker 2: prophecies about the Messiah, about Christ.
Speaker 3: You see issues.
Speaker 7: We got this.
Speaker 2: This bug just keeps coming back here anyway. You get
Speaker 2: these this time of year, we have a problem with
Speaker 2: stink bugs that get in every time you open the door,
Speaker 2: and then they seem to kind of keep wanting to
Speaker 2: march towards me. But anyway, we look at at what
Speaker 2: is happening with the Old Testament Kingdom prophecies, they always
Speaker 2: want to interpret them in terms of Israel rather than
Speaker 2: in terms of Christ. And I had a listener who
Speaker 2: sent me an email about that very thing about Isaiah
Speaker 2: fifty three, which is kind of interesting because when John
Speaker 2: MacArthur was on with Ben Shapiro, we talked to Ben
Speaker 2: Shapiro about Isaiah fifty three. Isaiah fifty three is an amazing,
Speaker 2: amazing prophecy that was written, and we know because we've
Speaker 2: got the Dead Sea Scrolls dated it now seven hundred
Speaker 2: years before Christ. And it's amazing how Isaiah fifty three,
Speaker 2: the suffering Servant is really about one individual, it's not
Speaker 2: about Israel. And now the rabbinic interpretations would always say
Speaker 2: that when Isaiah's talking about the servant, he's talking about
Speaker 2: Israel collectively. But this again was sent to me by
Speaker 2: a listener. I think he looked this up on Yeah,
Speaker 2: it was AI's take on it, which I would largely
Speaker 2: agree with. The text Isaiah fifty three was written approximately
Speaker 2: seven hundred BC, describes a sinless servant who suffers substitutionary
Speaker 2: for others, is silent before his accusers and dies among criminals.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, one of the reasons why
Speaker 2: John MacArthur did that, I've had I've heard so many
Speaker 2: times testimonies of Jewish people who become Christians. Many of
Speaker 2: them identify as messianic, Messianic Jews, but they'll frequently say
Speaker 2: the thing that really was the eye opener for them
Speaker 2: was Isaiah fifty three. Somebody would come to them and say,
Speaker 2: you know, read it to them and they say, who
Speaker 2: is that talking about. They say, well, I's talking about Jesus. Well,
Speaker 2: that's from your book. That's from Isaiah fifty three. So
Speaker 2: they'd look at it and they would question it, and
Speaker 2: it would be a real epiphany for them. And so
Speaker 2: as this points out, when it summarizes it, the summary
Speaker 2: that he sent me, he said, the core divide between
Speaker 2: mainstream Judaism is that the suffering Servant is the nation
Speaker 2: of Israel collectively, whereas Christians would understand it as the
Speaker 2: individual Messiah, fulfilled by Jesus Christ with remarkable precision approximately
Speaker 2: seven hundred years after the prophecy was written. And the
Speaker 2: reality is that the Christian position has always been doesn't
Speaker 2: show up in this summer here Christian positions. I understood
Speaker 2: it is that sometimes a servant is talking about Israel,
Speaker 2: and sometimes it is talking about the individual Messiah. But
Speaker 2: here's the kicker. When you go back and you look
Speaker 2: at Israel itself, Israel itself is a picture of the Messiah.
Speaker 2: For example, when you look at Matthew and it talks
Speaker 2: about how when Jesus fled Herod and his family went
Speaker 2: to Egypt and then they come back at a point
Speaker 2: in time and says, so the prophecy may be fulfilled
Speaker 2: out of Egypt. I have called him. It's like, well,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, that's talking about taking Israel out of
Speaker 2: Egypt collectively. That's what was talking about in the actual passage.
Speaker 2: And yes that actually happened. Yes God actually took them
Speaker 2: out of Israel. But that was a picture of what
Speaker 2: He would do with Christ. And that's the way it
Speaker 2: is throughout the Old Testament Kingdom prophecies. They are pictures
Speaker 2: of what God was going to do in Christ's work,
Speaker 2: what God was going to do with those who were
Speaker 2: the people who trust in God, the children of the Promise,
Speaker 2: as he points out, that were there before there was
Speaker 2: over the Mosaic Law, he still had the promise of
Speaker 2: Abraham and those who trusted in it. And so as
Speaker 2: Paul makes a distinction in several books of the New Testament,
Speaker 2: he talks about the fact that there's the people who
Speaker 2: are physically descended from Abraham, but it's different than the
Speaker 2: people who are his spiritual children who trust in Christ.
Speaker 2: The spiritual reality is greater than the physical reality that
Speaker 2: is stressed over and over again in the New Testament.
Speaker 2: And it's surprising to me that people can't see that
Speaker 2: is the greater reality that is there. But as they
Speaker 2: point out, while the Jewish collective interpretation fails logically, Isaiah
Speaker 2: fifty three describes a servant as sinless, no violence, notice
Speaker 2: heat in his mouth. Isaiah said repeatedly he condemned. At
Speaker 2: the same time, he repeatedly condemned Israel for sin in
Speaker 2: the same book. So you can't simultaneously indict the nation
Speaker 2: of Israel for sin and then present the nation of
Speaker 2: Israel as sinless. That is a direct internal contradiction, and
Speaker 2: that runs throughout the Bible. You know, we talk about
Speaker 2: the passage that's repeated the New Testament many times. You know,
Speaker 2: each of us has gone our own separate ways, right,
Speaker 2: and each of us has turned his own way, and
Speaker 2: there's none who is righteous, no, not one. How then
Speaker 2: do you say that the nation of Israel is the suffering,
Speaker 2: sinless Messiah, but just doesn't hold together. And furthermore, the
Speaker 2: servant suffers for others sins. He was pierced for our transgressions.
Speaker 2: If Israel is a servant, then who's sin ends?
Speaker 3: Is Israel?
Speaker 2: Annoint toning for Israel is a toning for gentile sin.
Speaker 2: And now that has no foundation anywhere in the tour.
Speaker 2: I don't even know if it's got a foundation in
Speaker 2: Talmud either. And then finally, Isaiah forty nine explicitly distinguishes
Speaker 2: the servant from Israel. It says a servant's mission is
Speaker 2: directed toward Israel, making them two separate entities. So early
Speaker 2: rabbinical sources, including the Targum Jonathan, applied Isaiah fifty three
Speaker 2: to an individual Messiah, not to Israel collectively. The collective
Speaker 2: interpretation became dominant only after Christianity adopted the individual messianic reading,
Speaker 2: suggesting that the shift was driven by the need to
Speaker 2: counter Christian apologetics rather than emerging organically from the text.
Speaker 2: And that is exactly what is happening with Zionism and
Speaker 2: with dispensationalism. They have substituted the nation of Israel for
Speaker 2: Christ himself in the same way that modern rabbinical writing
Speaker 2: substitutes of the nation of Israel for the suffering servant
Speaker 2: of Isaiah fifty three. The individual interpretation doesn't have any
Speaker 2: internal contradictions. The collective interpretation, however, requires ignoring all of
Speaker 2: these internal contradictions, at least three of them. And so
Speaker 2: that is one of the key things that we need
Speaker 2: to look at, and that is are we focusing ourselves?
Speaker 2: And this is for us as individually. We're focusing ourselves.
Speaker 2: I've been to churches that were focused on homeschooling, Right
Speaker 2: does that become the focus? Is our focus on a
Speaker 2: particular denomination? Is our focus on an ethnic group? Is
Speaker 2: our focus on politics? Is our focus on Israel a
Speaker 2: foreign political entity? We can always find a way to
Speaker 2: redirect our focus from the Lord Jesus Christ onto something
Speaker 2: that is more familiar, something that we really think is important,
Speaker 2: something that we make an idol out of, that is
Speaker 2: the true issue. Well, before I take a break, I
Speaker 2: want to get to this response to I had a
Speaker 2: listener was very upset with me because I played a
Speaker 2: clip from a Grady Judd. I've played that clip a
Speaker 2: lot of times. I thought was really funny. He says, hey,
Speaker 2: just chill out, have a moon pie and stop murdering people.
Speaker 2: I've played that over and over again with a lot
Speaker 2: of different context and yeah, yeah, go ahead and play that.
Speaker 8: So just chill out, drink your seven up, eat a
Speaker 8: moon pie, quit murdering people.
Speaker 2: Well, there you go. Now this guy was very upset
Speaker 2: with me. I'll tell you what he had to say.
Speaker 2: Georgia boy, what he goes by. He says, your research
Speaker 2: on jud He said, he is a corrupt individual that
Speaker 2: has all the wares of Satan. Please do research on
Speaker 2: these criminals before you promote them. He is a slithering snake.
Speaker 2: He is a Trump advocate. He's mentioned in the Epstein
Speaker 2: files at Hindustan Times dot com. I could spend hours
Speaker 2: elaborating on this media sound bite machine who has one
Speaker 2: hundred and eighty thousand followers on TikTok, Sir, I question
Speaker 2: your motivations and shame on you. Well, let me just
Speaker 2: say this. I did not do that to promote him.
Speaker 2: Anybody who listens to me, and has listened to me
Speaker 2: over a period of time, knows that I don't promote individuals.
Speaker 2: I promote principles. I promote issues, and I cover these
Speaker 2: things issue by issue. You take Ron Wyden, for example.
Speaker 2: I have spoken many times about Ron Wyden. I have
Speaker 2: defended him when James Clapper and Michael Hayden attacked him, said, well,
Speaker 2: he knew that we were spying on Americans with our
Speaker 2: search weren't How dare him? He knew and his staff new,
Speaker 2: and all those senators and all their staff new. Why
Speaker 2: did he put him on the spot. Why do you
Speaker 2: have him commit perjury in addition to violating the constitution.
Speaker 2: That's James Clapper says, a shame on Ron Widen. Well,
Speaker 2: I've talked about that, not to promote Ron Wyden, but
Speaker 2: to promote the idea that we do not want to
Speaker 2: have a government that does warrantless searches. We don't want
Speaker 2: to have a surveillance state. And every time I talk
Speaker 2: about it, I say, look, I'm not promoting Ron Wyden.
Speaker 2: He's got on his issues. He's a Democrat from I
Speaker 2: think Washington or something or Oregon, and I don't agree
Speaker 2: with him on anything except this particular issue. But I
Speaker 2: do agree with him on that issue, and it's amazing
Speaker 2: to me that he's about the only person in the
Speaker 2: Senate that has that position on that issue. So I
Speaker 2: do talk about I don't know why he takes a
Speaker 2: position for freedom there and it's against freedom on so
Speaker 2: many other areas. But I take these things one by one.
Speaker 2: And when I talked about a Grady Judd or dud Grady,
Speaker 2: I guess, yeah, Grady Judd. Yeah, he's got two first
Speaker 2: names there. I don't know which one goes first. Anyway,
Speaker 2: when I talked about him, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: even in the article, I was surprised because I had
Speaker 2: not done my research on I was just going with
Speaker 2: a SoundBite that he had. I thought it was excellent
Speaker 2: that there was pushback from local law enforcement against Trump
Speaker 2: and against Ron DeSantis in terms of what they were
Speaker 2: doing with the immigration policy. I don't agree with what
Speaker 2: they're doing with immigration policy. And I agreed with his position,
Speaker 2: with a Judg's position on the immigration policy, and I
Speaker 2: disagreed with what Ron DeSantis was doing about it as well,
Speaker 2: and so did Reason. But they did point out, they
Speaker 2: said with a caveat, they said, but this guy is
Speaker 2: a real drug warrior. And there were some other things
Speaker 2: that they said about it, and I read that. I
Speaker 2: pointed that out, and so understand that just to support
Speaker 2: somebody on one issue doesn't mean that you support them
Speaker 2: across the And when it comes to the war on drugs,
Speaker 2: I got to say, and anybody who watches this program
Speaker 2: knows what I think about the War on drugs, and
Speaker 2: they know what I think about Trump, anybody who supports Trump,
Speaker 2: anybody who supports war on.
Speaker 3: Drugs, and not somebody that I would vote for.
Speaker 2: Because the problem with war on drugs is not only
Speaker 2: does it corrupt our country, and it has been used
Speaker 2: as the excuse for every kind of police state, surveillance
Speaker 2: abuse you can imagine, every kind of bullying and shredding
Speaker 2: of the Constitution has been justified in the name of
Speaker 2: the war on drugs. And one of the worst things
Speaker 2: about it is that it directs people, gives them a
Speaker 2: false hope and a false solution. The solution to drug
Speaker 2: addiction is found in the Lord Jesus Christ. And we've
Speaker 2: covered this over and over again. I've had people come
Speaker 2: on and give testimonies as personal testimonies or testimonies as
Speaker 2: missionaries kids, a missionary families kid who saw this and
Speaker 2: how it got people who are addicted to drugs got
Speaker 2: them out of it. So I've had multiple people come
Speaker 2: on give their personal testimony. We've talked about how the
Speaker 2: government itself has seen that the programs that work are
Speaker 2: the ones that are based in faith the Lord Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: That is the issue. And so to hold up this
Speaker 2: idea that the government can fix this is a misdirection.
Speaker 2: It keeps me from the real solution to the real problem,
Speaker 2: and it also destroys our society and our government. So
Speaker 2: I do not, in any way, shape or form support
Speaker 2: the war on drugs. And so I just wanted to
Speaker 2: say that and make it clear that when I talk
Speaker 2: about these issues, and if I agree with somebody or
Speaker 2: I quote somebody, it's just about that. And I thought
Speaker 2: it was perfect the way that match. Since he was
Speaker 2: pushing back against ICE. I thought the fact that he said,
Speaker 2: chill out, stop murdering people, ecells.
Speaker 5: It's just Georgia boy that comments frequently in chat. I
Speaker 5: wanted to specify that he's not the same Georgia boy that.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, yeah, okay, that's fine. Yeah, this is Georgia
Speaker 2: Boy eight ninety is the one who said that. So
Speaker 2: it's that Georgia boy. I guess there's at least eight
Speaker 2: hundred and ninety of them. I guess unless that number
Speaker 2: has some specific meaning to him. We're gonna take a
Speaker 2: quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 14: Stay with us at.
Speaker 8: Anything using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 7: It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS radio
Speaker 11: has you covered, check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 11: on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, you know, just to continue
Speaker 2: on this whole thing, you know that chill out, have
Speaker 2: a moon pine, and stop murdering people. I thought that
Speaker 2: was very appropriate given the fact that Mark Wayne Muller
Speaker 2: has such anger issues and he's being put in charge
Speaker 2: of this police force that Trump is always turning to.
Speaker 2: It's like his own personal gestapo that's out there and
Speaker 2: he wants to put them in. At the TSA now
Speaker 2: and just take a look at what is happening. Here's
Speaker 2: Atlanta and the lines that you see from TSA. Look
Speaker 2: at this staking around the entire airport. Look at that
Speaker 2: absolutely amazing. The Atlanta TSA line has now stretched to
Speaker 2: a stunning one hundred and fifty three minute wait time
Speaker 2: At six am in the morning, tweeted somebody they put
Speaker 2: that picture out there. So yeah, that is the issue
Speaker 2: that we're facing there. And that is all in spite
Speaker 2: of the fact that everybody is very upset about we
Speaker 2: have to have TSA or we can't be safe. If
Speaker 2: the radical left Democrat, says Trump, don't immediately sign an
Speaker 2: agreement to let our country, in particular our airports be
Speaker 2: free and safe again, I'll move our brilliant and patriotic
Speaker 2: ice agents into the airport. So well, they were to
Speaker 2: do security like nobody has ever seen it before, says Trump.
Speaker 2: Childish and foolish, free and safe. No, the TSA and
Speaker 2: this BF skinner behavioral conditioning. Let me put my hands
Speaker 2: on you and then you can fly. That's positive operantic conditioning.
Speaker 2: That is beyond freedom and beyond dignity, and it doesn't
Speaker 2: do anything for anybody's safety. Here's an example of this
Speaker 2: TSA failing ninety five percent of the time when tested.
Speaker 16: TSA officers failed ninety five percent of the time during
Speaker 16: undercover operations designed to test their ability to detect explosives
Speaker 16: and weapons at airport security checkpoints.
Speaker 6: These are anomalies that that TSA screeners and or their
Speaker 6: equipment should it locate in at least a flag for
Speaker 6: an additional screening.
Speaker 16: Teams with the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General's Office
Speaker 16: posed as passengers and attempted to pass through airport checkpoints
Speaker 16: with mock explosives and weapons. A government official with knowledge
Speaker 16: of the say TSA failed sixty seven out of seventy tests.
Speaker 6: To miss sixty seven out of seventy different instances is
Speaker 6: extremely alarming, and I would say even dangerous.
Speaker 3: I am putting a detonator and.
Speaker 5: It wasn't dangerous.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 16: There is no threat at the airports CNA was there
Speaker 16: in two thousand and eight a similar covert operation. That
Speaker 16: time it was TSA testing its own officers at the checkpoint.
Speaker 16: The tester is wanded and padded down where the fake
Speaker 16: explosive device was concealed, but the screener missed it. It's
Speaker 16: not until the tester lifts his shirt up.
Speaker 3: Oh, I see it now.
Speaker 16: The Department of Homeland Security says, it quote immediately directed
Speaker 16: TSA to implement a series of actions. Several of which
Speaker 16: are now in place.
Speaker 6: Is it the technology that's failing or is it the
Speaker 6: screeners themselves not following proper protocol. If TSA's screening equipment
Speaker 6: is failing and not doing the job, that's a larger
Speaker 6: systemic issue that TSA needs to address.
Speaker 16: Renee Marsh CNN, Washington.
Speaker 2: No, the big issue is that there is no threat. Look,
Speaker 2: if they're failing ninety five percent of the time we
Speaker 2: haven't had any issues at all, then of course there
Speaker 2: is no threat. And we know that from their documents.
Speaker 2: I've said this many times before patro dot gov, where
Speaker 2: they post the lawsuits that are there, and also the
Speaker 2: documents are part of discovery. They made a mistaken They
Speaker 2: put them up without redacting them, and then they realized
Speaker 2: that later that day. But we got both of those.
Speaker 2: The person who had the lawsuit against TSA notified us
Speaker 2: and we got the what they put up that was unredacted,
Speaker 2: and then they took that down and they redacted it
Speaker 2: to show us what they didn't want us to see.
Speaker 2: And what they didn't want us to see was in
Speaker 2: two thousand eleven they said there is no threat against
Speaker 2: airports or airplanes because you know, frankly folks, we can
Speaker 2: determine that ourselves. We don't need the TSA to tell
Speaker 2: us that. But the TSA did tell us that. We
Speaker 2: don't need the TSA to tell us that because since
Speaker 2: they can't catch anybody, we would have had if there
Speaker 2: was a threat, there would have been terrorist attacks.
Speaker 3: But they're not.
Speaker 2: So this is an intelligence test. This is an obedience test.
Speaker 2: That's what it really is.
Speaker 5: Yes, and we would have heard about it if they
Speaker 5: had caught someone. Also, it's right, just the ones that
Speaker 5: they let slip through. They would be trumpeting that from
Speaker 5: the rooftops if they could actually stopped a single threat
Speaker 5: in their entire existence.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: They need to do what the FBI does, which is
Speaker 2: to create their own threats and then bust it is
Speaker 2: like an arsonist starting the fire, fireman, arsonist.
Speaker 3: Right, at all the fires that I put.
Speaker 5: Out, they still missed ninety seven percent of the people
Speaker 5: they send through.
Speaker 3: That's right. So Elon Musk is gonna come to the rescue.
Speaker 3: He said. He offered on Saturday to help pay the
Speaker 3: TSA workers. I'd like to offer you.
Speaker 2: I'd like to offer to pay the salaries of TSA
Speaker 2: personnel during this funding impass that is negatively affecting the
Speaker 2: lives of so many Americans at airports throughout the country. Again,
Speaker 2: the solution is not to fund it, but to cancel it.
Speaker 2: And at the very least you could if you're going
Speaker 2: to continue with this security theater that doesn't protect anybody
Speaker 2: because there's not any threat and they've proved that there
Speaker 2: is no threat. If you're going to continue this, you
Speaker 2: could at least do what a half dozen airports do,
Speaker 2: which is to allow them to be funded individually instead
Speaker 2: of going through the government. Just like the government got
Speaker 2: in the way with the air traffic controllers. You don't
Speaker 2: need to have the TSA. And even if you've got
Speaker 2: the TSA and this security theater, it doesn't need to
Speaker 2: be funded through the government. But now Trump is going
Speaker 2: to send ICE agents to the airports on Monday, So
Speaker 2: again that's his go to federal police. He loves having
Speaker 2: the the ICE agents. They are his own personal gestapo
Speaker 2: that are out there. And we'll just wrap up with
Speaker 2: this one last thing. I got this email from a
Speaker 2: listener and I appreciate it. This is Benny h on
Speaker 2: Subscribe Storry sent us a tip and he said, this's
Speaker 2: catch up for the payment that was rejected in December
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five and missed some contributions since then. So
Speaker 2: he said, I know you're frustrated on the day that
Speaker 2: you had some technical difficulties and that was nothing compared
Speaker 2: to what happened today. So we're running late and we're
Speaker 2: going to re edit this and put this on a
Speaker 2: loop and put the program that we've now done because
Speaker 2: we had so many problems this morning. But fortunately Travis
Speaker 2: and Lance got this thing together. They troubleshoot troubleshot in
Speaker 2: pairs that you guys have found the issue now, so
Speaker 2: thank you for doing that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, the problems we had today was a result of
Speaker 5: replacing equipment that was skilling that was causing the other problems.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we didn't put in correctly, so I apologize.
Speaker 2: So he said, I heard your comment as while listening
Speaker 2: to the rebroadcast, and that was one of the other
Speaker 2: things that you know, my voice is supposed to be
Speaker 2: out of it, and I had a hot mic. Fortunately
Speaker 2: I didn't get too hot. But he said, just remember
Speaker 2: the enemy, Satan, the devil doesn't want the information you're
Speaker 2: providing to get it out, and this is spiritual warfare,
Speaker 2: just as I was saying before. You know that is
Speaker 2: each and every one of us is involved in spiritual
Speaker 2: warfare on a daily basis, constantly, really, and it's not
Speaker 2: about what Pete Hegsa thinks. It's about, you know, preparing
Speaker 2: our hands for warfare and our fingers. Battle is not
Speaker 2: so that we can go kill people in foreign lands
Speaker 2: like a crusader.
Speaker 3: It's not that at all.
Speaker 2: But he said, every morning when you get up, he says,
Speaker 2: I want the devil's expression to be ah. Hell, David
Speaker 2: Knight's up again on the radio. Well he had us today,
Speaker 2: didn't he.
Speaker 3: For a while.
Speaker 2: But anyway, we're back and I appreciate all of you
Speaker 2: who are still with us. So by the way, he
Speaker 2: also says, he's a fellow believer out of Temple Terrace, Florida,
Speaker 2: which I know that area very very well. Grew up
Speaker 2: in Tampa, and I knew a lot of people in
Speaker 2: Temple Terrace, but I don't know if I knew you, Benny,
Speaker 2: But appreciate it. Thank you so much, thank you for
Speaker 2: the support. And yeah, we're still taking some incoming hits,
Speaker 2: take a lot of them today, but we're back and
Speaker 2: hopefully we won't have any problems with the broadcast in
Speaker 2: the future. Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
Speaker 2: The common man. They created common Core and dumbed down
Speaker 2: our children. They created common past, track and control us
Speaker 2: their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
Speaker 2: and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 2: unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 2: created in the image of God.
Speaker 3: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 3: they want to take away.
Speaker 2: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 2: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com