Speaker 1: Folks, we are uncovering truth here Clay Travis and Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton today at noon, which will result in lib.
Speaker 2: Tears on fifty five KRC talkstation. A six here fifty
Speaker 2: five KRCD talk station. Happy Tuesday, Great time to be
Speaker 2: tuned into the fifty five KRC Morning Show, but you
Speaker 2: can find the podcast as always at fifty five KRC
Speaker 2: dot com. Welcome back to the fifty five KRC Morning
Speaker 2: Show from Breitbart b R E I T b a
Speaker 2: RT dot com, Bright Bart book It political reporter Wendell Husabo.
Speaker 2: Good to have you on the program and a happy
Speaker 2: Tuesday to you, sir.
Speaker 3: Good morning, Brian from a cold Washington.
Speaker 2: That's cold here too, so you can't look on the
Speaker 2: city of Cincinnati had twenty one degrees with any envy
Speaker 2: this morning. Although it may be colder where you are,
Speaker 2: it sucks to be in winter time period of the story.
Speaker 2: U Joe Biden in his statement pardoning his son, which
Speaker 2: I think most people believe was gonna happen, but he
Speaker 2: said his son had been treated differently by the Justice
Speaker 2: Department and was single out only because he is my son,
Speaker 2: and that is wrong. Well, you know you and I
Speaker 2: might look at that statement and say, actually that's accurate.
Speaker 2: He was singled out and actually was singled out for
Speaker 2: soft treatment. He was treated differently than any other human
Speaker 2: being in the United States who would be prosecuted for
Speaker 2: all the financial transactions he engaged in let's face it,
Speaker 2: prior to them being barred by the statute limitations.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: I think Marco Paulo has done some good work and
Speaker 1: they've put out a spreadsheet of about one hundred and
Speaker 1: forty statutes that Hunter, you know, may have violated. And
Speaker 1: that just speaks to why Joe Biden, you know, extended
Speaker 1: this pardon to Hunter over the course of ten years
Speaker 1: because I think, you know, there was maybe some fear
Speaker 1: that some justice would be coming over the next four years.
Speaker 2: Well, let me ask you this, is it possible that
Speaker 2: justice could still becoming now? I know, Joe Biden's got
Speaker 2: more pardons up his sleeve, and you know, the whole
Speaker 2: Biden family is probably going to be given a partner
Speaker 2: for the same period of time. But what of the
Speaker 2: receipt of all this money, the fact that he was
Speaker 2: received from foreign governments. Aren't there like FIA charges that
Speaker 2: could be brought here to other against other people. I mean,
Speaker 2: he received millions from the Chinese Communist Party, he received
Speaker 2: millions from the Russians, he received millions from the Abarissma
Speaker 2: holdings in Ukraine, I mean, and a lot of that
Speaker 2: money got distributed to a variety of different Biden family
Speaker 2: members and friends. So is this all dead and over
Speaker 2: with with Hunter Biden's broad pardon.
Speaker 1: I think Hunter Biden was just the front man for
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. And so when you when you
Speaker 1: look at these wire transfers that Oversight Chairman James Comer
Speaker 1: has dug up, it shows a whole web of of
Speaker 1: money flowing to and from Biden family members that originated
Speaker 1: from overseas business. And so Joe Biden has not issued
Speaker 1: a pardon. James Biden, which is Joe Biden's brother, Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's uncle, James Biden, is probably more corrupt than Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: He just didn't have a laptop that he abandoned at
Speaker 1: a New York repair shop.
Speaker 2: Apparent probably didn't have as bad of a drug problem either,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Probably probably not, although I think there was some images
Speaker 1: of him maybe that was the other his Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: other brother, of him taking you know, a naked shot
Speaker 1: of him in the bathroom.
Speaker 3: The whole family is gross.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think America is going to be very
Speaker 1: happy when they get a real president back in the
Speaker 1: White House.
Speaker 2: Well, and I think you know it's this type of thing,
Speaker 2: the the the the treatment of Hunter Biden, and again
Speaker 2: the fact that they slow walk the original investigation. You
Speaker 2: have these irs whistleblowers talking about me. They had damning
Speaker 2: information on him. They had the Hunter Biden laptop information
Speaker 2: in the form of that. That was the the the
Speaker 2: FBI investigation form form was it two twenty three year
Speaker 2: or something. Anyway, it was all corroborated independently by their investigation.
Speaker 2: It shows up on a laptop. You got fifty one
Speaker 2: people from the Obama administration stepping up saying the laptop
Speaker 2: is a bunch of Russian hoaxes, just enough to get
Speaker 2: Biden through the election. We all saw it with our
Speaker 2: own eyes. We all witnessed it. We've all been listening
Speaker 2: to this nonsense. And for the past four years, Donald
Speaker 2: Trump beat the living hell out of Kamala Harris. In
Speaker 2: spite of eight years of constant drum beat of evil
Speaker 2: Orange man zeemophobe, hole of foe races misogynist. Blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: You couldn't get away from that, and yet he bludgeoned
Speaker 2: her like a baby harp seal. That's the American people
Speaker 2: knowing what's going on, isn't it.
Speaker 1: I think what this election proved is that the American
Speaker 1: people are very smart and we should trust the American
Speaker 1: people on who they believe is best to lead this country.
Speaker 1: And the people who have been leading this country are
Speaker 1: I have not done a good job, and the people
Speaker 1: who have helped them stay in power have totally lost credibility,
Speaker 1: such as the media. You have the media going out
Speaker 1: there saying for months that, oh, Joe Biden's not going
Speaker 1: to part in Hunter because Joe Biden said so. Well,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's word isn't worth a flip, and so the
Speaker 1: media has egg on their face today. And that's why
Speaker 1: you're saying the media, you know, tiptoeing around saying, oh wow, gee,
Speaker 1: Joe just lied to us, or you know, Joe's not
Speaker 1: making us look very nice. Well, Joe is not a
Speaker 1: very nice guy. He's an angry old man. And when
Speaker 1: he leaves office, I think he'll be remembered as the
Speaker 1: most correct president in American history.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's an excellent and astute observation. Another stute observation
Speaker 2: I saw this morning from James Freeman speaking about this pardon.
Speaker 2: Also a question of who authored the statement that came out.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden clearly didn't. He reminded the readers that, you know,
Speaker 2: it was only ten months ago the Justice Department special
Speaker 2: counsel said Joe Biden was too forgetful to prosecute even
Speaker 2: though there was, you know, indictable information there. And more
Speaker 2: than four months after they pulled the plug on his
Speaker 2: presidential campaign because of his mental infirmities. And and here
Speaker 2: we go. I mean, who art have you ever concluded,
Speaker 2: my friend Wendell, who the puppet masters are? I mean,
Speaker 2: most of my listeners believe it to be the Biden,
Speaker 2: the former Obama administration and those that are still around,
Speaker 2: because Barack Obama didn't go far go, very far away
Speaker 2: after he left office. So is that Neo's behind all
Speaker 2: this quote unquote strategy if you can even call this
Speaker 2: a strategy.
Speaker 1: I think that Joe Biden has some loyalists, and I
Speaker 1: think the chief loyalist is Joe Biden. I think Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: you know, really wants power, really wants to be in
Speaker 1: the spotlight. I think that you know, she has a
Speaker 1: lot of influence with Joe Biden's thinking, maybe as the
Speaker 1: enforcer behind the scenes with Joe Biden's you know, top deputies.
Speaker 1: But the bottom line is they have covered up Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's mental infirmities for four years and that came to
Speaker 1: the forefront in such a way that he had to
Speaker 1: drop out of the presidential race, and they installed Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: which you know, was a terrible candidate, but Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was also a terrible candidate. And so I guess what
Speaker 1: we get is another more four years of a terrific
Speaker 1: President Trump.
Speaker 2: Well, let's hope that the Republicans hurry up and get
Speaker 2: a whole lot done before the midterm elections, because you know,
Speaker 2: if history is any guy, the party in power typically
Speaker 2: loses seats and we back to square one and do nothing.
Speaker 2: Congress going back.
Speaker 1: If I could interject, if I could, oh yeah, please,
Speaker 1: I think I think one thing that happens when Republicans
Speaker 1: get powers, they don't use their voters give them the
Speaker 1: power to make changes, and they in the past have.
Speaker 3: Done very little.
Speaker 1: Yes, and so the hope is in the next four
Speaker 1: years that Donald Trump installs the men and women that
Speaker 1: he would like to help him change government. We need
Speaker 1: to drain the swamp. We need to fire people in
Speaker 1: these federal bureaucracies. And without doing that, we're just going
Speaker 1: to be trying to tread water for the next four years.
Speaker 1: And then you're right, we're going to have no results
Speaker 1: because guess what, Donald Trump promised for four years that
Speaker 1: he would drain the swamp. And so if he delivers
Speaker 1: on that promise, I think Americans are going to be
Speaker 1: very happy they elected Donald Trump to do so.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 2: Indeed they did now and something I'm a little disheartened
Speaker 2: by but kind of expecting is along the lines of
Speaker 2: the Republicans not you know, using the power that the
Speaker 2: voters have given them by giving them a majority. They
Speaker 2: gave we got the Execus, we got the House, got
Speaker 2: the Senate. Fine, it's time to get something done. I
Speaker 2: saw an op ed piece just the other day on
Speaker 2: the Inflation Reduction Act, the Green New Deal, and you
Speaker 2: got all these Republican states that are giving getting a
Speaker 2: lot of green money to keep carbon out of the environment,
Speaker 2: even though it's a naturally occurring plant food, and they're going, well, WHOA, Well,
Speaker 2: maybe not so fast. I don't know that we're gonna
Speaker 2: backpedal and completely get rid of the Inflation Reduction Act
Speaker 2: because he hey, look, I'm in Nebraska, and you know,
Speaker 2: we get a lot of money in corn subsidies so
Speaker 2: we can burn food in our gas tank and it
Speaker 2: would really hurt our farmers if we take away that.
Speaker 2: And we're gonna make a whole lot of money on
Speaker 2: carbon capture. It's all a fiction. It's created out a
Speaker 2: whole cloth for through legislation, has no binding a connection
Speaker 2: with reality. And yet I'm worried the Republicans are going
Speaker 2: to be defending this stuff just because, well, it's in
Speaker 2: their backyard.
Speaker 1: Under Donald Trump's leadership, there has been a political realignment
Speaker 1: occurring in this country, and that political realignment has not
Speaker 1: yet been completed. The next four years, hopefully we can
Speaker 1: get a little bit further. But the reason why Republicans
Speaker 1: are so weak is because we have a lot of
Speaker 1: Republicans who are actually just establishment Democrats who vote with
Speaker 1: the Democrats, who want everything that the Democrats want, and
Speaker 1: who go to cocktail parties and you know, drink the
Speaker 1: same drinks and cheers each other when they get their
Speaker 1: huge paydays.
Speaker 3: And so I think.
Speaker 1: The continuing, the continuing cleaving of these essentially establishment Democrats
Speaker 1: from Congress will make a difference over the long haul.
Speaker 1: It's very difficult to make changes without a party who
Speaker 1: has cohesion, and right now the Republican Party is the
Speaker 1: party that is the reform party, and we just have
Speaker 1: some stragglers that we need to remove from office like Collins,
Speaker 1: mrcous the McConnell.
Speaker 3: These people are snakes.
Speaker 2: And they're holding the Republican Party back words that certainly
Speaker 2: resonate with my listening audience. Now before I would like
Speaker 2: you to either support my enthusiasm Wendel or burst the
Speaker 2: bubble of my enthusiasts, or perhaps somewhere in between. I
Speaker 2: love the idea of this Doe Department of Government efficiency.
Speaker 2: It's not part of government. It's like two brilliant guys
Speaker 2: sitting in a room just going through line by line
Speaker 2: the ridiculous spending in all areas of government and cutting
Speaker 2: them and giving these recommendations to Congress, who can then
Speaker 2: act on them. Vv A Grahma swimming and of course
Speaker 2: Elon Musk. Neither of them need the money that might
Speaker 2: come with a paying position. They are brilliant at business
Speaker 2: and they've been down this road before in terms of
Speaker 2: the challenges of businesses and making a profitable entity. Do
Speaker 2: you think they can actually bring about effective change and
Speaker 2: cut the size and scope of government or am I smoking.
Speaker 3: Something going to give them an opportunity.
Speaker 1: I don't see why they could not follow through on
Speaker 1: it unless they're just lying to us. But the good
Speaker 1: news is that Donald Trump has nominated a man named
Speaker 1: Russe Vote to be OMB director. That's the Office of
Speaker 1: Management and Budget. And the Office of Management and Budget
Speaker 1: is a significant department because it oversees in the implementation
Speaker 1: of Trump's vision across the executive branch through acting funding
Speaker 1: that different agencies requests. And so my understanding is that
Speaker 1: Vivic and Musk are going to be working with Vote
Speaker 1: on how to actually acts this waste. And Vote was
Speaker 1: in there before as acting O and B director during
Speaker 1: Trump's first administration and if you remember when Trump said okay,
Speaker 1: no more funding for Ukraine and they tried to impeach
Speaker 1: Donald Trump over at RUSS.
Speaker 3: Vote was at the nucleus of that.
Speaker 1: And so I think we have a strong team going
Speaker 1: into going into the next four years. I will hopefully
Speaker 1: follow through on their promises.
Speaker 2: Well, supporting my enthusiasm to a certain degree, tempering it
Speaker 2: a little bit, which is what you're well, what's her about?
Speaker 2: All about? Wenda? Who's both been great having you on
Speaker 2: Political Reporter from over at Breitbart again, b R E
Speaker 2: I T B A RT dot com. You're going to
Speaker 2: enjoy what you read there. If you're not already bookmark Bookmarket.
Speaker 2: I'll look forward to another segment with the folks from
Speaker 2: Breitbart next week. Have a wonderful week, and thanks for
Speaker 2: the time you spend my listeners and I today Wendell.
Speaker 3: Thanks Brian, have a great day, My pleasure.
Speaker 2: Eight nineteen to fifty five RC The Talk Station got
Speaker 2: a Daniel Davis deep dive coming up to the bottom
Speaker 2: of the hour. We'll talk Russia, Belarus, Georgia, and again
Speaker 2: we're going to learn about blood cancers. My expert friends
Speaker 2: from OHC, the cancer specialists beyond the tail end of
Speaker 2: this hour to talk about blood cancers and give you
Speaker 2: some very valuable information. I hope you can stick
Speaker 3: Around fifty five KRC, The Talk Station