WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You want to have great facts because appellate courts, you

2
00:00:05.400 --> 00:00:09.759
<v Speaker 1>know very much, will pick apart bad facts and use

3
00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it to make bad law, or will not even give

4
00:00:12.400 --> 00:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>you the answer you on on a legal question. If

5
00:00:16.079 --> 00:00:19.359
<v Speaker 1>there are bad facts, and so that's what the sec

6
00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has here, you know, it's better to take an FTX

7
00:00:23.199 --> 00:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>or a do quon case like that up to up

8
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to an appeal, and that would just be a lot safer.

9
00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:37.719
<v Speaker 2>This content is brought to you by v chain, which

10
00:00:37.759 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is a leading enterprise grade Layer one public blockchain spearheading

11
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:46.759
<v Speaker 2>a digital revolution from a sustainable, highly scalable smart contract platform.

12
00:00:47.000 --> 00:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>The v chain blockchain has many unique features which makes

13
00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it an ideal choice for Web three applications. V chain

14
00:00:54.359 --> 00:00:58.119
<v Speaker 2>is working with many great enterprises such as PwC, Gvonci,

15
00:00:58.280 --> 00:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>BMW and Walmart China. Most recently, they partnered with the

16
00:01:02.280 --> 00:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Boston Consulting Group to build a revolutionary decentralized application ecosystem.

17
00:01:08.840 --> 00:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big believer in this project. I have been

18
00:01:11.439 --> 00:01:14.519
<v Speaker 2>since twenty eighteen. I've been a VET token holder for years,

19
00:01:14.920 --> 00:01:19.239
<v Speaker 2>and this blockchain is highly scalable, great with security and speed,

20
00:01:19.400 --> 00:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and it has low energy consumption. If you'd like To

21
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>learn more about v chain, please visit vchain dot org.

22
00:01:26.439 --> 00:01:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Link will be in a description. Welcome into the Thinking

23
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Crypto Podcast. I'm your host, Tony Edward, and with me

24
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:34.239
<v Speaker 2>is attorney Fred Rispoli, who's the founder of Hoddle Law.

25
00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Fred.

26
00:01:34.879 --> 00:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Great to see you.

27
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:37.879
<v Speaker 1>It is great to be back Tony.

28
00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Fred. Of course, we got the big news yesterday of

29
00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the SEC Ripple lawsuit ruling and the SEC getting one

30
00:01:45.079 --> 00:01:47.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five million dollars, and I want to

31
00:01:47.359 --> 00:01:49.640
<v Speaker 2>get your take on it, you know, walk us through

32
00:01:49.719 --> 00:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the ruling and the outcomes here.

33
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:55.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, it's you know, I've had a day

34
00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to sleep on it and think about it, and there's

35
00:01:58.760 --> 00:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more nuance in there that you know I

36
00:02:01.439 --> 00:02:04.239
<v Speaker 1>was picking up on. And I really have to give

37
00:02:04.359 --> 00:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Judge Torres credit for the way she attacked this, because

38
00:02:08.919 --> 00:02:11.319
<v Speaker 1>not only did she do it well on the legal side,

39
00:02:11.400 --> 00:02:16.319
<v Speaker 1>but she also did it well to give each side

40
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>enough of what they want and also fearful enough of

41
00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:25.159
<v Speaker 1>what could be lost to really question whether there's gonna

42
00:02:25.199 --> 00:02:28.039
<v Speaker 1>be an appeal here on this one. And I'll get

43
00:02:28.039 --> 00:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>into that, you know, generally, as we go through. But

44
00:02:30.759 --> 00:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bottom line is the order stands for

45
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the proposition that Ripple did not do anything with bad intent,

46
00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:45.439
<v Speaker 1>or it'll repute, so to speak. So the penalty was

47
00:02:45.479 --> 00:02:47.479
<v Speaker 1>on the lower side. It was a little bit higher

48
00:02:47.479 --> 00:02:49.719
<v Speaker 1>than I thought it was going to be, but it

49
00:02:49.759 --> 00:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was still low in comparison to the two billion dollars

50
00:02:53.000 --> 00:02:57.479
<v Speaker 1>being sought, and so you know, that's huge. The second thing,

51
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and actually this is probably the most sortant thing, is

52
00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that the order that the sec had wanted the judge

53
00:03:05.879 --> 00:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to sign, the one they drafted and gave the judge,

54
00:03:09.120 --> 00:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was rejected by the court, and the court went with

55
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a very generic order that essentially says, you are enjoined

56
00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>from violating section five of the securities laws going forward.

57
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, guess what. You know, we haven't been

58
00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you and me, we haven't been sued by the SEC yet,

59
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:35.159
<v Speaker 1>but we're also enjoined from violating section five of the

60
00:03:35.199 --> 00:03:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Federal securities Law. So it is, you know, something that

61
00:03:39.560 --> 00:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is as basic as it can be about you know,

62
00:03:44.639 --> 00:03:47.919
<v Speaker 1>what they're prohibited from in this injunction. And it does

63
00:03:48.159 --> 00:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>leave a lot up for question as to what Ripple

64
00:03:53.159 --> 00:03:57.439
<v Speaker 1>can and can't do going forward, But it doesn't explicitly,

65
00:03:58.599 --> 00:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, by or it doesn't explicitly destroy their business model,

66
00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:06.639
<v Speaker 1>which is what the SEC was going for in this,

67
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact it when it stayed far away from that,

68
00:04:10.400 --> 00:04:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and that was, you know, the best takeaway out of this.

69
00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:16.839
<v Speaker 2>So FREDI, you know, let's say we go back to

70
00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:20.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty when this thing was filed. Obviously, they seemed

71
00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:24.079
<v Speaker 2>to be some personal I don't know, vendettas or shots

72
00:04:24.079 --> 00:04:27.399
<v Speaker 2>here because they went after Brad and Chris right and

73
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:30.639
<v Speaker 2>they made it seem like Ripple was doing this massive

74
00:04:30.759 --> 00:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>fraud scheme or something like that when it was far

75
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>from that. So did the SEC kind of shoot itself

76
00:04:38.040 --> 00:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>in its foot by going adding all these things to

77
00:04:42.519 --> 00:04:46.120
<v Speaker 2>this case versus saying, hey, your institutional sales are problems.

78
00:04:46.480 --> 00:04:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk. Yeah, the SEC, which it normally does, decided,

79
00:04:53.079 --> 00:04:57.319
<v Speaker 1>let's go big, big guns going into this suit, and

80
00:04:57.399 --> 00:05:00.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to throw in in the individuals and we're

81
00:05:00.480 --> 00:05:03.519
<v Speaker 1>going to throw our full weight behind this and try

82
00:05:03.519 --> 00:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and scare them into a settlement on our terms. Rebels survived,

83
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:11.879
<v Speaker 1>decided to fight. Most companies don't, and they survived the

84
00:05:11.879 --> 00:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>initial onslaught, and then after surviving that onslaught, you know,

85
00:05:16.639 --> 00:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>they just got better and better for them as the

86
00:05:19.879 --> 00:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>litigation went on, and you know, people forget the whole

87
00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>People don't forget the ethery and free pass, but some

88
00:05:27.399 --> 00:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people maybe forget or don't know that when Bill Henman

89
00:05:32.199 --> 00:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>left the sec or and said even before he left

90
00:05:36.279 --> 00:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and said I'm going to retire by this date, he

91
00:05:39.480 --> 00:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>continually went back and talked to people at the SEC

92
00:05:44.519 --> 00:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and really shepherded the decision to sue Ripple, really pushed

93
00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it through, trying to make sure everybody says, even though

94
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:54.759
<v Speaker 1>we're all leaving, you guys got to still be on

95
00:05:54.800 --> 00:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>board with this and file this suit and then left

96
00:05:58.839 --> 00:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and hoping it was all going to go to plan.

97
00:06:01.519 --> 00:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it did take a very long time,

98
00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:06.639
<v Speaker 1>but four years later it did not go the way

99
00:06:06.680 --> 00:06:07.319
<v Speaker 1>they were hoping.

100
00:06:08.720 --> 00:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So XRP declared intrinsically not a security. Brad and Chris,

101
00:06:13.399 --> 00:06:16.079
<v Speaker 2>you know that case has been dropped. The SEC gets

102
00:06:16.079 --> 00:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty five million dollars. Ripple seems to

103
00:06:19.920 --> 00:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>have walked away with the lion's share of the victory.

104
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Here. Would you agree with that? I would, and I

105
00:06:25.639 --> 00:06:29.079
<v Speaker 1>would disagree with the people who are out there saying

106
00:06:29.680 --> 00:06:34.519
<v Speaker 1>their business model is significantly damaged or their ODL model

107
00:06:34.600 --> 00:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is significantly damaged. I just don't see that based on

108
00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>what the ruling was, what the pleadings were going into it.

109
00:06:42.920 --> 00:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can get into that, of course, but

110
00:06:47.040 --> 00:06:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and also you know how the company has responded in

111
00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, since the since the order came out.

112
00:06:56.240 --> 00:06:59.519
<v Speaker 2>So I guess the big question I have is can

113
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Ripple sell XRP to institutional investors, so let's say Black

114
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:06.959
<v Speaker 2>Rock or whatever right in the United States? I'm assuming no,

115
00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>But can they do it internationally? It seems like they can.

116
00:07:11.399 --> 00:07:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would argue that they can do it in

117
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the US and outside of the US a lot easier,

118
00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but even inside the US, and the issue with inside

119
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and what is specifically prohibited is really depends on what

120
00:07:27.519 --> 00:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>risk that Ripple wants to take. So you have to

121
00:07:30.879 --> 00:07:34.279
<v Speaker 1>go back to the summary judgment ruling from a year

122
00:07:34.319 --> 00:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ago when the judge said institutional sales are what is illegal,

123
00:07:41.079 --> 00:07:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and the judge casually lumped in ODL in that category,

124
00:07:47.399 --> 00:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and there was never really further discussion on that, and

125
00:07:50.079 --> 00:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>then we went into the specifics of what all those

126
00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>institutional sales were, so what they are definitely enjoined from

127
00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:02.519
<v Speaker 1>going forward that there's no question is exactly what happened

128
00:08:03.120 --> 00:08:07.759
<v Speaker 1>as set forth in those pleadings and described, you know,

129
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:12.519
<v Speaker 1>with all the evidence, the contracts, everything, that is what's enjoined.

130
00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And so Ripple can make an argument saying, are sales

131
00:08:17.959 --> 00:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to other companies of XRP here, even in the US

132
00:08:21.560 --> 00:08:24.839
<v Speaker 1>are so far outside of what we got punished for.

133
00:08:25.759 --> 00:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just not an investment contract. And the only thing

134
00:08:30.160 --> 00:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that happens there is that the sec gets wind of

135
00:08:33.879 --> 00:08:38.159
<v Speaker 1>it and they tell Ripple to stop, and Rypple says, no,

136
00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:41.879
<v Speaker 1>these are not what we were prevented from doing. And

137
00:08:42.000 --> 00:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a court order that says we are not specifically

138
00:08:46.399 --> 00:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>prevented from this. And I'm talking about the judgment, I guess,

139
00:08:50.360 --> 00:08:53.039
<v Speaker 1>and the order itself. So the judgment is the two

140
00:08:53.159 --> 00:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>or three page document. The order is the fifteen page

141
00:08:58.080 --> 00:09:02.919
<v Speaker 1>legal reasoning. You know. The judge there is where it

142
00:09:02.919 --> 00:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gets a little you know, again, this is what this

143
00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is what I do appreciate Judge Torres doing. Is where

144
00:09:08.799 --> 00:09:13.519
<v Speaker 1>she gave enough to both sides, so she I'm gonna

145
00:09:13.639 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 1>just look at it so I don't talk too crazy.

146
00:09:15.679 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Ripple said, hey, get ODL out of

147
00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this order. And the judge said in her ruling yesterday. Well,

148
00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that I had ODL in the institutional sales bucket.

149
00:09:29.759 --> 00:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me it's different. Just because you tell me

150
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it's different, I'm not buying it. But in the very

151
00:09:36.440 --> 00:09:40.039
<v Speaker 1>next sentence she says, I'm also not not buying it.

152
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:43.039
<v Speaker 1>So you know, she's saying, I'm not going to say

153
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that everything you're doing now is totally fine. In fact,

154
00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you may you may have still been violating the law.

155
00:09:52.159 --> 00:09:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to tell you that you know you're

156
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:57.519
<v Speaker 1>in for a real whoopan' if if the SEC brings

157
00:09:57.519 --> 00:10:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you back here and I find what you're doing is

158
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:03.159
<v Speaker 1>is outside is still within the scope of what I

159
00:10:03.200 --> 00:10:07.799
<v Speaker 1>told you not to do. So yes, I would argue

160
00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>they can still sell XRP within the US, even without

161
00:10:11.720 --> 00:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>registration and without an exemption. But you know, it depends

162
00:10:16.639 --> 00:10:18.919
<v Speaker 1>on how much Ripple wants to play that to the line,

163
00:10:19.080 --> 00:10:22.039
<v Speaker 1>and it depends on how much it's clients want to

164
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>play that to the line. Although the clients don't really

165
00:10:25.399 --> 00:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>need to worry because none of them were taken a

166
00:10:27.759 --> 00:10:31.159
<v Speaker 1>court and they made lots of money, even the ones

167
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>way back that we're at issue in the institutional sales

168
00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they made a lot of money on this, so you know,

169
00:10:38.039 --> 00:10:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they're very much in the clear. And it really comes

170
00:10:42.960 --> 00:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>down to what we're ultimately going to see is you know,

171
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people saying Ripple only sells

172
00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:52.759
<v Speaker 1>XRP and that's its business model and it dumps onto retail.

173
00:10:52.879 --> 00:10:56.759
<v Speaker 1>There's other people that say, when once the switch is flipped,

174
00:10:56.960 --> 00:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything's going to go to the moon. And

175
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:04.159
<v Speaker 1>now is in a position where the emergency cover over

176
00:11:04.200 --> 00:11:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the switch has now been unlocked. And so we're going

177
00:11:08.000 --> 00:11:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to see what was Ripple just for lack of a

178
00:11:13.639 --> 00:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>better word, blowing smoke or do they have a sustainable

179
00:11:17.519 --> 00:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>business model that they can now accelerate into serious growth.

180
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I believe that they do and they

181
00:11:24.440 --> 00:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>do have a strong business model. But we're going to

182
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>see great point.

183
00:11:29.240 --> 00:11:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Now, there was a question from the community, and I

184
00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:35.919
<v Speaker 2>have thoughts around this as well. So let's say institutions

185
00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>are accredited right there, they have all the licenses and

186
00:11:39.519 --> 00:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>all these things. Why can't Ripple specifically sell to black

187
00:11:44.320 --> 00:11:47.799
<v Speaker 2>Rock and that be a securities transactions, but it doesn't

188
00:11:47.840 --> 00:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>affect the rest of the x RP in the open

189
00:11:50.039 --> 00:11:52.919
<v Speaker 2>market or the XRP ledger can they just get a

190
00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>license for that aspect of the transaction, know if that

191
00:11:58.639 --> 00:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>makes sense.

192
00:11:59.480 --> 00:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So here's where I know enough securities law to

193
00:12:03.279 --> 00:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be dangerous because there it is incredibly complex when you

194
00:12:07.639 --> 00:12:10.799
<v Speaker 1>get into all the rules and specific exemptions. And I'm

195
00:12:10.840 --> 00:12:14.159
<v Speaker 1>just not an expert there, but based on my knowledge

196
00:12:14.159 --> 00:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and understanding, if you're going to get an exemption, I

197
00:12:18.559 --> 00:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't even need to register some of those exemptions.

198
00:12:23.159 --> 00:12:26.039
<v Speaker 1>You just you know, have a good faith belief that

199
00:12:26.080 --> 00:12:28.519
<v Speaker 1>you fall within there. And again it would be up

200
00:12:28.559 --> 00:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the sec to figure it out and take Ripple

201
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>back to court saying you're in contempt of disorder. You

202
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>know by doing this. This is not an exemption. This

203
00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is an institutional sale that requires registration. And so what

204
00:12:43.879 --> 00:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Ripple can do? You know, if they go to exemption route,

205
00:12:46.879 --> 00:12:50.399
<v Speaker 1>there's certain exemptions that they can't do because they've already

206
00:12:50.440 --> 00:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten in trouble by the court. And when you get

207
00:12:52.879 --> 00:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in trouble and have that type of injunction, it removes

208
00:12:56.720 --> 00:13:00.759
<v Speaker 1>some exemptions. And then it also could cause a problem

209
00:13:00.799 --> 00:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>because if you buy the XRP under an exemption, you

210
00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:07.919
<v Speaker 1>can't resell it unless there's another exemption. And so that

211
00:13:07.960 --> 00:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>could make it a little more complicated, but it is

212
00:13:10.480 --> 00:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one route that they could go through, is you know,

213
00:13:13.159 --> 00:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the accredited investor exemption process.

214
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:20.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, big question people want to or have, I should say,

215
00:13:21.279 --> 00:13:23.919
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen with the appeals? Will ripple and

216
00:13:23.960 --> 00:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the SEC both appeal?

217
00:13:26.639 --> 00:13:31.639
<v Speaker 1>So I I think that, I mean, it is as

218
00:13:31.679 --> 00:13:33.759
<v Speaker 1>close to a fifty to fifty as you can get,

219
00:13:33.799 --> 00:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>although I'm going to lean towards not appealing just because

220
00:13:38.720 --> 00:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's too many factors that if the SEC

221
00:13:43.519 --> 00:13:47.399
<v Speaker 1>is wise and smart, which also is an issue that

222
00:13:47.440 --> 00:13:50.519
<v Speaker 1>people might significantly disagree with me on and I probably

223
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:55.879
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me on that too, is that this isn't

224
00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:58.919
<v Speaker 1>really the best case to take up. When you're going

225
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:03.039
<v Speaker 1>to do an appeal, you want to have great facts

226
00:14:03.639 --> 00:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>because appellate courts, you know very much, will pick apart

227
00:14:08.080 --> 00:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bad facts and use it to make bad law, or

228
00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>will not even give you the answer you want on

229
00:14:14.279 --> 00:14:18.159
<v Speaker 1>a legal question if there are bad facts. And so

230
00:14:18.399 --> 00:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what the SEC has here. You know, it's better

231
00:14:21.039 --> 00:14:25.039
<v Speaker 1>to take an FTX or a do quon case like

232
00:14:25.080 --> 00:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that up to up to an appeal, and that would

233
00:14:27.879 --> 00:14:32.759
<v Speaker 1>just be a lot safer. So that's point number one

234
00:14:32.840 --> 00:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>factor one against an appeal. I think the penalty, you know,

235
00:14:36.559 --> 00:14:39.759
<v Speaker 1>looking back, was probably a great call by the judge

236
00:14:39.799 --> 00:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>because it's if the penalty was too high, Ripple would

237
00:14:43.519 --> 00:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>surely appeal. If the penalty was too low, the SEC

238
00:14:47.759 --> 00:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>surely would appeal. And you know, now on this the

239
00:14:52.519 --> 00:14:55.679
<v Speaker 1>again going back to the facts issue, the SEC's got

240
00:14:55.720 --> 00:14:57.919
<v Speaker 1>to go back up to the Second Circuit and say

241
00:14:58.039 --> 00:15:01.679
<v Speaker 1>say that the discouragement of zero rout was a problem. Well,

242
00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Second Circuit already said that there can be zero disgorgement.

243
00:15:06.679 --> 00:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got a case where there was no investors that

244
00:15:09.559 --> 00:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>said they were harmed, and so the Second Circuit is

245
00:15:13.519 --> 00:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just going to strengthen that opinion. And that is where

246
00:15:18.039 --> 00:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the SEC loves filing cases is in New York, which

247
00:15:21.360 --> 00:15:24.039
<v Speaker 1>is under the Second District. So that's a bad idea

248
00:15:24.120 --> 00:15:28.519
<v Speaker 1>to appeal there. You know, on the appeal it side,

249
00:15:28.879 --> 00:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Ripple can argue that there is no you know, essential

250
00:15:34.120 --> 00:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>ingredient to the contracts that they argued at the summary

251
00:15:37.559 --> 00:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>judgment and loss. That's not a very clear cut winner

252
00:15:42.200 --> 00:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>case right there for them, And the SEC would want

253
00:15:46.360 --> 00:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to appeal the secondary market issue, which is, you know,

254
00:15:49.559 --> 00:15:52.039
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that is driving whether they should

255
00:15:52.039 --> 00:15:56.559
<v Speaker 1>appeal or not is we got to get that off

256
00:15:56.639 --> 00:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the books for the secondary market, because you know, that's

257
00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:04.919
<v Speaker 1>critical to how we do this, how we run our

258
00:16:05.039 --> 00:16:09.559
<v Speaker 1>enforcement actions, you know, anywhere with crypto and so you know,

259
00:16:09.639 --> 00:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you could you could get a situation though, where they decide, well,

260
00:16:13.919 --> 00:16:17.799
<v Speaker 1>let's let's appeal the Binance one where they said no

261
00:16:17.960 --> 00:16:23.559
<v Speaker 1>secondary markets with this exchange, and let the XRP one stand,

262
00:16:23.679 --> 00:16:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and then XRP and Ribble would be in a unique

263
00:16:26.440 --> 00:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>one off where those facts have been decided and not appealed,

264
00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and you could conceivably, three or four years get a

265
00:16:36.120 --> 00:16:41.639
<v Speaker 1>ruling that secondary sales are securities generally, and only XRP

266
00:16:41.879 --> 00:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is now, you know, completely protected from that because that

267
00:16:44.960 --> 00:16:47.519
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it wouldn't be able to be changed, or

268
00:16:47.519 --> 00:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>at least a very strong argument that any future decision

269
00:16:51.799 --> 00:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect that aspect of this ripple ruling. So there's

270
00:16:55.679 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, and then there's also the political

271
00:16:58.279 --> 00:17:00.559
<v Speaker 1>side of it. You know, I was starting to get

272
00:17:00.559 --> 00:17:04.039
<v Speaker 1>worried when I missed my prediction by seven days that

273
00:17:04.319 --> 00:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the sec or that the court was saying, you

274
00:17:07.440 --> 00:17:11.079
<v Speaker 1>know what if I wait until early September to issue

275
00:17:11.079 --> 00:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a ruling. The SEC doesn't have to make a decision

276
00:17:14.279 --> 00:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>on the appeal until after the election. You know, the

277
00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Judge Tours has never kind of signaled doing anything like

278
00:17:20.519 --> 00:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that or having those kinds of thoughts go through in

279
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>her ruling. So it was, you know, but it did

280
00:17:26.720 --> 00:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>start to creep into my mind, but she didn't. And

281
00:17:29.200 --> 00:17:31.599
<v Speaker 1>so now the SEC has to make that decision and

282
00:17:31.680 --> 00:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ripple two by you know, early October. And so if

283
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:39.599
<v Speaker 1>they do, I mean to be to be honest, in

284
00:17:39.720 --> 00:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>US politics, a lot of people start making their minds

285
00:17:42.680 --> 00:17:45.599
<v Speaker 1>up the month before the election. That's when things get

286
00:17:45.640 --> 00:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really crazy. That's why there's a term called the October surprise.

287
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.039
<v Speaker 1>And so if the SEC has to file a notice

288
00:17:53.039 --> 00:17:58.039
<v Speaker 1>of appeal early October, every pro crypto force can say,

289
00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this is another example, don't believe the reset. Don't believe

290
00:18:01.839 --> 00:18:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you know anything that this campaign is telling you. They're

291
00:18:05.400 --> 00:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>anti crypto, and so that's just that's a political headache

292
00:18:08.759 --> 00:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that they would have to deal with.

293
00:18:10.839 --> 00:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was gonna ask you about that because in

294
00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the context of everything that's been going on over the

295
00:18:17.039 --> 00:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>past four to five months, I mean, you got Donald Trump,

296
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:22.279
<v Speaker 2>our presidential candidate calling out the head of the SEC,

297
00:18:23.319 --> 00:18:26.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, and saying he would fire him, and so forth.

298
00:18:26.440 --> 00:18:29.400
<v Speaker 2>You got Democrats turning on Elizabeth warning Gary gains Her,

299
00:18:29.880 --> 00:18:32.359
<v Speaker 2>and then there seems to be some sort of capitulation

300
00:18:32.440 --> 00:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>with the SEC. They dropped the case against the Binance

301
00:18:34.640 --> 00:18:37.279
<v Speaker 2>stable coin, they dropped the case against Stax, they dropped

302
00:18:37.279 --> 00:18:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the investigation against Etherorem, they approved the etherom metfs, and

303
00:18:40.720 --> 00:18:43.359
<v Speaker 2>then there was rumors of the Binance us case. They're

304
00:18:43.400 --> 00:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>pulling out tokens like Solana Cardano and so forth. So

305
00:18:47.000 --> 00:18:51.079
<v Speaker 2>something is happening here. Maybe that political pressure will influence

306
00:18:51.240 --> 00:18:51.640
<v Speaker 2>if they.

307
00:18:51.559 --> 00:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Appeal or not. Yeah, there is foreshore political pressure, and

308
00:18:57.839 --> 00:19:01.039
<v Speaker 1>they eventually some of these things will come out to

309
00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the public. Some of these things will never know. There

310
00:19:03.559 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 1>was extraordinary political The reason the ethery of METF got

311
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>approved was because of political pressure. And you know, it'll

312
00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be I guess probably not shocking to anybody in the

313
00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>XRP community when they hear how that went down, you know,

314
00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>when that eventually comes out. But there's other things going

315
00:19:20.920 --> 00:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>on that are just phone calls, meetings. During you know,

316
00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>at a lunch at a popular lunch spot in New Downtown,

317
00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:33.519
<v Speaker 1>you know New York. I'm sorry to all my New

318
00:19:33.599 --> 00:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>York fans out there for not using the right boroughs

319
00:19:36.000 --> 00:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. But wherever the courthouse is, and in New York,

320
00:19:40.319 --> 00:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know all the lunch spots around there, and you

321
00:19:42.440 --> 00:19:45.279
<v Speaker 1>know in d C. And in the suburbs, and you know,

322
00:19:45.440 --> 00:19:48.839
<v Speaker 1>down in all those hangouts where they're having these conversations.

323
00:19:48.880 --> 00:19:50.759
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, it's sad because that's not the

324
00:19:50.839 --> 00:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, but that has always happened, you know,

325
00:19:54.519 --> 00:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in America and otherwise you know where you have these conversations,

326
00:19:58.240 --> 00:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and so that's happened. But you know, it's a battle

327
00:20:01.480 --> 00:20:04.519
<v Speaker 1>right now between which faction is going to win out

328
00:20:04.680 --> 00:20:08.039
<v Speaker 1>in terms of pro crypto or anti crypto. And it's

329
00:20:08.079 --> 00:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>been very encouraging the last couple of weeks and a

330
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:14.039
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, but you know, you really have to

331
00:20:14.079 --> 00:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>push forward. And you know, anybody that's very pro crypto,

332
00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, and I'm doing this. I'm voting

333
00:20:21.359 --> 00:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on single issue pro crypto candidates. You know, in my elections.

334
00:20:25.960 --> 00:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm out here in California and nationally because if I

335
00:20:30.279 --> 00:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get super rich from crypto, everything I care about all

336
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>these other things. I care about social, economic issues. I

337
00:20:37.759 --> 00:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot more being super rich than I

338
00:20:40.559 --> 00:20:44.799
<v Speaker 1>can be just being you know, you know where I

339
00:20:44.839 --> 00:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>am now.

340
00:20:46.359 --> 00:20:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I've brought up that point that first and

341
00:20:49.000 --> 00:20:52.519
<v Speaker 2>foremost people are trying to survive. You have to have shelter, food,

342
00:20:52.559 --> 00:20:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and you everybody's trying to increase their lifestyle right and

343
00:20:55.680 --> 00:20:59.640
<v Speaker 2>make it better. And while there are other issues in

344
00:20:59.640 --> 00:21:02.559
<v Speaker 2>this e lite, if you, like you said, are able

345
00:21:02.599 --> 00:21:05.599
<v Speaker 2>to grow your wealth and become more financially free, you

346
00:21:05.640 --> 00:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>can then start to address some of those secondary tertiary

347
00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:11.319
<v Speaker 2>issues that you care about. But you can't do that

348
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:15.680
<v Speaker 2>if you're you know, not able to create that opportunity.

349
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I mean at the end of the day,

350
00:21:19.119 --> 00:21:21.599
<v Speaker 1>you know what does happen and why, you know, short

351
00:21:21.640 --> 00:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of getting drafted and sent off to war or you know,

352
00:21:25.839 --> 00:21:28.839
<v Speaker 1>having federal forces or state forces show up at your

353
00:21:28.839 --> 00:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>doorstep and take you away to jail, there's not much

354
00:21:31.440 --> 00:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you can do now that's to change things. Now, that

355
00:21:34.160 --> 00:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean give up and you know, not get involved

356
00:21:38.000 --> 00:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>at all, but just recognize what your limitation is and

357
00:21:41.039 --> 00:21:43.319
<v Speaker 1>recognize kind of what you can do with whatever your

358
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>your circumstances are. And you know that changes if you

359
00:21:46.599 --> 00:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have a family, don't have a family, or a business owner,

360
00:21:49.359 --> 00:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not a business owner. But you know, the bottom line

361
00:21:51.920 --> 00:21:56.039
<v Speaker 1>is the more resources that you have, the more change

362
00:21:56.079 --> 00:21:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you can make. And you know that's just something. And

363
00:21:58.880 --> 00:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>if the way you're going to get resources is with

364
00:22:01.599 --> 00:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto appreciating vastly, then you just got to solely focus

365
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:09.839
<v Speaker 1>on that side of the wing. On the political election side.

366
00:22:10.119 --> 00:22:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Final question herefore, I let you go, what are the

367
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>odds or have the odds increase of an XRP ETF

368
00:22:16.000 --> 00:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>being approved by the SEC? Given that this thing is

369
00:22:18.279 --> 00:22:20.599
<v Speaker 2>wrapping up, and look, I'm not talking this year, but

370
00:22:20.640 --> 00:22:23.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe next year, what do you think about that?

371
00:22:24.039 --> 00:22:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think it goes up because I think there'll

372
00:22:26.319 --> 00:22:32.319
<v Speaker 1>be a new regime next year. Even regardless of who wins,

373
00:22:32.440 --> 00:22:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I think things will shift around. And I think that,

374
00:22:35.799 --> 00:22:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if you know on the Republican side,

375
00:22:39.880 --> 00:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we've got the candidate saying he's going to be extremely

376
00:22:42.400 --> 00:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>pro crypto, the great thing about not being in office

377
00:22:45.680 --> 00:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is you can say whatever you want. And you know,

378
00:22:47.799 --> 00:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we know that Trump's record was not very pro crypto

379
00:22:53.720 --> 00:22:57.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen through twenty twenty. Granted it's been much worse

380
00:22:57.880 --> 00:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>under the current regime. But those are the facts, and

381
00:23:01.359 --> 00:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>people can change, and I hope that Trump has changed

382
00:23:05.359 --> 00:23:09.519
<v Speaker 1>on that topic. But I also think that all the

383
00:23:09.759 --> 00:23:13.039
<v Speaker 1>money that is coming into crypto candidates. I mean, there

384
00:23:13.079 --> 00:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was a very well known Democratic congresswoman, Corey Bush who

385
00:23:17.240 --> 00:23:19.799
<v Speaker 1>just lost her primary. You know, there's a lot of

386
00:23:19.839 --> 00:23:22.319
<v Speaker 1>factors that went into that. But what people are sleeping

387
00:23:22.359 --> 00:23:26.599
<v Speaker 1>on is that fair Shake spend a couple million or

388
00:23:26.640 --> 00:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>at least over a million trying to get her out

389
00:23:29.200 --> 00:23:32.279
<v Speaker 1>because she was anti crypto, and so that's a message.

390
00:23:32.759 --> 00:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>When you are an incumbent and you lose a primary,

391
00:23:35.400 --> 00:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that is noticed in the halls of Congress, and so

392
00:23:39.720 --> 00:23:43.559
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get a favorable and more favorable than

393
00:23:43.559 --> 00:23:47.079
<v Speaker 1>where it is now regime from the Democrats, you know,

394
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if they win the election. And so I do think

395
00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the chances of the XRP ETF have gone up. It'll

396
00:23:56.680 --> 00:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a kick in the stomach

397
00:23:59.079 --> 00:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to see us ALTA one go first. But I do

398
00:24:01.920 --> 00:24:04.759
<v Speaker 1>think XRP is going to be in the top five

399
00:24:05.359 --> 00:24:06.279
<v Speaker 1>for ETFs.

400
00:24:07.119 --> 00:24:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agreed, And you know, on that fair Shake

401
00:24:09.680 --> 00:24:12.400
<v Speaker 2>superPAC it's over two hundred million dollars. Now, I think

402
00:24:12.640 --> 00:24:16.079
<v Speaker 2>if I'm not mistaken. It's the largest super packing election

403
00:24:16.200 --> 00:24:20.880
<v Speaker 2>cycle and it's crypto. If you told me that in

404
00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:23.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three, I wouldn't believe you. But the industry

405
00:24:23.440 --> 00:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>is fighting back and I don't blame them.

406
00:24:25.519 --> 00:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is. I mean, yeah, it's crazy. It's the

407
00:24:28.279 --> 00:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>largest or the second largest. I mean, it is a

408
00:24:31.279 --> 00:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. And whether you're a Democrat or a

409
00:24:35.240 --> 00:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>publican candidate, you know one thing, and whether you agree

410
00:24:38.440 --> 00:24:40.839
<v Speaker 1>or not, that moves these elections is money. And you

411
00:24:41.000 --> 00:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>go where the money is. And so you know, there

412
00:24:42.960 --> 00:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>could be a lot of people and if they all

413
00:24:44.440 --> 00:24:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden are pro crypto because they're getting money,

414
00:24:47.559 --> 00:24:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that's fine because they're expected to keep their promises when

415
00:24:51.359 --> 00:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they take that money. So whether they believe in it

416
00:24:54.720 --> 00:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or not, as long as you get the right laws,

417
00:24:56.880 --> 00:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the right legislation in there, I'm okay with that. Fred.

418
00:25:01.400 --> 00:25:03.799
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate you, man, I appreciate your insights. Thank you

419
00:25:03.839 --> 00:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining me.

420
00:25:05.200 --> 00:25:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no problem. Let me just plug one thing I

421
00:25:08.759 --> 00:25:13.279
<v Speaker 1>just found out recently on our Songbird air drop case

422
00:25:13.359 --> 00:25:17.599
<v Speaker 1>against coinbase. We got an oral argument just set in

423
00:25:17.759 --> 00:25:21.039
<v Speaker 1>early October, probably right after the day I think the

424
00:25:21.079 --> 00:25:24.519
<v Speaker 1>appeals is going to be filed. So I wanted to

425
00:25:24.599 --> 00:25:27.039
<v Speaker 1>say thank you to everybody who watched me try and

426
00:25:27.079 --> 00:25:30.039
<v Speaker 1>do my best at the oral argument last week or

427
00:25:30.039 --> 00:25:34.079
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago against the SEC for the ethereum case

428
00:25:34.119 --> 00:25:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we have. This one's more important for all the songbird

429
00:25:38.839 --> 00:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people who never got their Songbird from Coinbase. I'll put

430
00:25:42.000 --> 00:25:45.079
<v Speaker 1>it on my x handle. If you watch that, I

431
00:25:45.160 --> 00:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would really appreciate it.

432
00:25:47.160 --> 00:25:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everyone go check that out. I'll put links to

433
00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:52.119
<v Speaker 2>Fred's website and so forth in Twitter. But Fred, thank

434
00:25:52.119 --> 00:25:55.839
<v Speaker 2>you so much for fighting on behalf of retail investors.

435
00:25:55.920 --> 00:25:58.880
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know why Coinbase did this, but you

436
00:25:58.920 --> 00:26:00.680
<v Speaker 2>know I appreciate you fight. Gonna be half of

437
00:26:00.720 --> 00:26:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Us, all right, Well, I'll see you later, Tony,
