Speaker 1: Imagine this for a second. You're not just reading a
history book. You're looking through a tear in the page.
You're out there, maybe tricking through the deepest jungle you
can imagine, or looking into the darkest, coldest lake.
Speaker 2: And you see something, something that shouldn't be.
Speaker 1: There exactly, something that just completely defies the textbook, defies
the entire timeline of evolution that we've all been taught.
Speaker 2: It challenges everything, and that exact feeling, you know, that
sense that maybe our textbooks are missing a few chapters
or maybe a whole volume. It's what we're getting into today.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this deep dive is all about looking at sources
that really push back on our neat and tidy understanding
of biology, of history, of reality itself.
Speaker 2: What if the wildest legends, the stories that just refuse
to die, giant apes, sea monsters, what if they're not
just folklore, what if they're actually well misunters did historical records.
Speaker 1: We've got some really fascinating sources here, and they connect
things you would never think to together. We're talking gigantic
prehistoric apes, theories about ancient aliens literally engineering human beings, and.
Speaker 2: Then there's unexplained aerial phenomena UFOs tied to very specific
spots on the planet, and of course ancient sea monsters
that might still be down there.
Speaker 1: Our mission really is to unpack the connections between all
of these and just see how deep this rabbit hole
goes and maybe what it all says about what it
even means to be human.
Speaker 2: And the starting point for this whole journey, funnily enough,
isn't some ancient ruin. It's a small, probably pretty dusty
medicinal shop.
Speaker 1: In nineteen thirty five Hong Kong, of all places.
Speaker 2: A completely mundane transaction that well, it unearthed a giant.
Speaker 1: It's an amazing story. So you have this German paleontologist,
doctor Gustav von Konixfault. He's browsing in one of these
traditional shops, you know, the kind filled with jars of
herbs and dried bits of well everything.
Speaker 3: Right, believe to have all sorts of curative properties, and
he spots these huge teeth, just massive molar teeth, and
the shopkeeper is selling them as dragon teeth, you know,
a folk remedy from some ancient mythological serpent.
Speaker 2: So of course he's a scientist. He knows what he's
looking at.
Speaker 1: Instantly, he recognized them right away as primate teeth, just
primate teeth on a scale nobody had ever seen before.
And that purchase, probably for just a few bucks, became
the very first fossil evidence of an extinct species that
just completely changes the game for primate history.
Speaker 2: So let's start there with the sheer reality of this creature,
the one von Conis Fould named Gigantopithecus.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's establish the scale, because when we say largest
known primate, I think people picture a big gorilla.
Speaker 2: This is not that, oh, not even close. You have
to completely reset your mental image. We were talking about
a creature that stood on average ten feet tall ten
feet and its weight is estimated up to twelve hundred pounds.
That's over half a ton of primate. It's just immense.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 2: And what's really crucial here is that this wasn't some ancient,
distant awshoot that out long before us. Our sources are
clear Gigantopithecus lived alongside early hominids for tens of thousands
of years. They were sharing the same landscape.
Speaker 1: That is terrifying to imagine our tiny ancestors running into
that thing. Let's get into the anatomy though, because that's
where the connection to modern legends really starts to click.
What did the skull tell us?
Speaker 2: Okay, so the fossils, especially the jawbones, tell a very
specific story for its huge body size. Gigantopithecus had a
relatively small brain, okay, but its jaws and teeth were
absolutely massive, just far more robust than any primate we
know of. And to anchor the muscles you'd need to
power those.
Speaker 1: Jaws, you need a different skull structure exactly.
Speaker 2: The skull needed these extra crests and ridges of bone
running along the top like a bony mohawk.
Speaker 1: That's the sagital crest, right. We see that in modern
gorilla precisely.
Speaker 2: It's a huge anchor point for the temporalis muscles that
control the jaw. A creature that big, with that kind
of crushing power, was built for a diet of incredibly
tough stuff bamboo roots, things you need to hatch it for.
Speaker 1: The massive brute strength, but a tradeoff in brain capacity.
Speaker 2: That's the blueprint. It's a specialized boot force animal, and.
Speaker 1: That physical profile leads us straight into one of the
most persistent, if you know, controversial cryptids out there. What
does this ten foot tall, small brain, powerfully jawed ape
mean for Bigfoot?
Speaker 2: Well, the most popular theory presented in the sources is
that creatures like bigfoot, Sasquatch, the yetty they may be
the direct descendants of a surviving population of Gigantipithecus.
Speaker 1: Okay, walk us through that.
Speaker 2: Well, think about it. You have a species perfectly adapted
for deep forest or mountain survival. It's got that immense size,
incredible power, and probably a natural ability to stay hidden.
If a population of those survived the last extinction events
and just retreated into the most remote wild parts of
the world, North America, the Himalayas, it fits the description.
It fits perfectly the eyewitness descriptions of sasquatch. Yeah, huge, hairy,
immensely powerf often with that sort of conical head shape.
It aligns with what you'd expect from descendative Gigantipithecus.
Speaker 1: Okay, I can see the anatomical link, but you know,
my skeptical hat comes on here. Gigantopithecus fossils are found
in Asia. Sasquatch is a legend of the Pacific Northwest.
How do you bridge that gap and the bigger question,
if they're still around, why no bodies, Why no definitive
fossil record?
Speaker 2: And that's the multi million dollar question, isn't it. It's
the reason it's a legend and not in a biology textbook.
But the sources suggest a couple of things. First, the
ancestral Gigantipithecus was incredibly widespread across Asia, showing a high
degree of adaptability. And second, if the whole point of
their survival is elusiveness, it stands to reason they don't
die out in the open for us to find.
Speaker 1: They'd retreat to a cave or deep part of the forest. Right.
Speaker 2: But what really gives the theory weight beyond just anatomy
is the cultural ubiquity of the legend.
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, let's talk about that, because that's harder to dismiss.
It is not just a North American thing. This idea
of a giant, hairy wild man is everywhere.
Speaker 2: It's everywhere, and that raises a really powerful question. Why
do so many cultures across the entire globe, cultures separated
by oceans for thousands of years? Yeah, we're talking South America,
Native American tribes, Russia and China, Tibet, Australia. Why do
they all have these strikingly similar legends.
Speaker 1: A giant bipedal hairy man beast that lives just outside
of civilization exactly.
Speaker 2: The prevalence is so widespread it suggests, as the sources
put it, these creatures were very, very prevalent and widespread
across the world in times past. This isn't just a
campfire story. It feels like a shared ancient memory.
Speaker 1: And if that biological reality was so common, it only
makes sense it would get woven into our very first stories,
our first.
Speaker 2: Epics, which brings us to ancient Sumeria.
Speaker 1: The epic of Gilgamesh, one.
Speaker 2: Of our oldest written stories, almost four thousand years old.
And who is Gilgamesh's great companion and Kidu?
Speaker 1: And the description of NQW is very specific.
Speaker 2: Incredibly specific. He's described as a hairy wild man or beast.
He has immense strength, and he lives in the wilderness
with the animals, totally outside the rules of human society.
He is, for all intents and purposes, a force of nature.
Speaker 1: And the sources we're looking at suggest that if you
just read that description literally in kido, could be interpreted
as and un quoting some kind of bigfoot sasquatch figure.
Speaker 2: It's an example of our earliest civilizations actually encountering and
having to deal with one of these large, hairy hominids.
Speaker 1: But this is where the story takes a sharp turn, right,
It moves away from just zoology and into something much
more radical.
Speaker 2: This is where it gets really wild. The sources claim
that Nktu's origins might not be purely of this Earth.
The Sumerian accounts are interpreted to imply he had a
possible extraterrestrial origin.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack that. When the sources say extraterrestrial in
the context of Samaria, they're talking about the Nunaki, right.
Speaker 2: The Ananaki, in these radical interpretations are the Samerian sky gods,
powerful beings who came to Earth from another solar system.
Sometimes they're linked to the Grays of modern Ufo lore,
and they came here for a reason.
Speaker 1: So in this view, and Kidu wasn't just some wild
creature they found he was a prototype, the.
Speaker 2: First test subject. The sources suggest he was the first
being genetically fashioned by the Anonachy.
Speaker 1: Why what was the purpose?
Speaker 2: The theory is that these beings put their genetic marker
onto an existing large ape like creature, maybe a descendant
of Gigantopithecus. To create a worker, they needed a labor force.
Certain interpretations of the tablet suggest it was for mining
gold or other practical tasks.
Speaker 1: The biblical phrase make man in our image and after
our likeness.
Speaker 2: That's the connection the sources make. This idea of genetic
manipulation turns the hairy wild man from just a monster
into a foundational piece of our own origin story. And
it sets the stage for an even more radical question,
what if we are the real manufactured product.
Speaker 1: That's a perfect bridge. Let's pivot from NK do the
supposed engineered brute and look at us, Homo sapiens. If
you put a gigantic eithic a skull next to a
human skull, the evolutionary jump is well, it's jarring.
Speaker 2: It's a massive, I mean massive discrepancy. The human skull is,
as the sources say, remarkably smaller overall. But and this
is the key, it has a hugely expanded cranial capacity.
Speaker 1: Our brains are enormous for our body size, enormous.
Speaker 2: And look at our jaws, they're delicate. The muscles that
drive them are tiny compared to a gorilla, let alone gigantopithecus.
We don't have those big bony crests on our skulls.
All that space, all that bone structure was repurpose for
the frontal lobe.
Speaker 1: It's the ultimate evolutionary trade off, isn't it. We gave
up that crushing bite strength for complex thought, for language,
for planning.
Speaker 2: We did. But the sources really challenged the idea that
this happens slowly through natural selection. What accounts for such
a rapid dramatic change in what should be a related species.
Speaker 1: This is the classic missing link problem. Mainstream science says
there's a gradual progression, we just haven't found all the
fossils yet.
Speaker 2: But the sources were analyzing today they proposed something else entirely.
They argue the missing link isn't a fossil we're going
to dig up one day. They say the missing link
is extraterrestrial intervention. That without some kind of outside push,
our evolution just wouldn't have happened this way this fast.
Speaker 1: And it's not just the brain size. What about our skin,
our hair. If we evolve from these hairy hominids, why
are we than naked ape for hundreds of thousands of years.
Being hairless was a huge disadvantage. We had to wear
animal furs hide in caves to stay warm. It doesn't seem.
Speaker 2: Optimal, that's the argument exactly. Our ancestors must have been
covered in fur for protection, yet we lose it, and
at the same time we get this massive brain. It
feels like a really strange nonlinear change.
Speaker 1: The sources also point to things like the difficulty of
human childbirth.
Speaker 2: Yes, another great example. Our skulls got bigger faster than
our pelvises could adapt for bipedal walking. That creates an
evolutionary bottleneck that for millennia was incredibly dangerous for both
my mother and child. Again, it cited as evidence of non optimal,
maybe even rushed engineering. We don't seem perfectly adapted for
this world.
Speaker 1: So this leads us to the core of the radical
hypothesis that our ancient hairy hominid ancestors were genetically manipulated
and spliced.
Speaker 2: By beings from another solar system, the Aninachi, the grays,
whatever you want to call them. The idea is that
they injected their own DNA into these existing Earth primates.
Speaker 1: And the goal wasn't just to make them smarter. It
was to create a suitable, maybe more docile workforce that
could understand complex instructions to make man in our image.
Speaker 2: Right. So if you accept that premise, then the leap
from say a Neanderthal to a chromagnet a modern human
wasn't a slow natural climb. It was a genetic jumpstart,
an alteration. The missing link wasn't missing, it was installed.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay, So if that's the theory, if we were
manufactured with a blend of alien and hominid DNA, it
begs a huge question what happened to the originals? Where
did the unspliced creatures go?
Speaker 2: And that brings us right back to Bigfoot. The sources
propose two main possibilities. One, creatures like Sasquatch are the
last surviving examples of the prehistoric comitidts who were here
before the invention.
Speaker 1: The original dominant species.
Speaker 2: Or two, they're the ones who escaped experimentation. They're the
control group, the evolutionary line that continued on its own, untainted.
Speaker 1: That is a staggering idea because it just completely flips
the script on who the anomaly is on this planet.
Speaker 2: It does if humans are the product of this genetic engineering.
Then we are the real alien creatures. We are the
hybrid species.
Speaker 1: And if that's true, then Bigfoot's elusiveness suddenly makes a
different kind of sense, a lot more sense.
Speaker 2: Why do they hide from us. Maybe it's not because
they're scared of our guns or our technology. Maybe they're
elusive because they recognize us.
Speaker 1: They see us as the product of the experiment they avoided.
Speaker 2: Exactly. We are the alien interlopers, the manufactured hybrids. They're
in distinctively afraid of the unnatural path we represent. They're
the original intelligence of Earth, and they're just staying away
from the weird experiment that took over the planet.
Speaker 1: That is a chilling thought, the idea that the monsters
were hunting might just be the planet's original untampered residence.
Speaker 2: And it connects this giant hominid category directly to our
earliest documented conflicts, our first figures of absolute terror.
Speaker 1: You have to talk about Goliath.
Speaker 2: You have to the biblical story of David and Goliath.
Goliath fits the description perfectly. He's described as huge, big, hairy,
immensely strong, a true warrior machine. He wasn't just a
tall guy. He was deployed as a weapon of terror
against the Israelites.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine for an ancient army seeing a creature
like that on the battlefield must have been psychologically devastating.
It would have defied their understanding of biology absolutely.
Speaker 2: And when you look at how scholars have tried to
interpret him, some suggest Goliath might have been an early
representation of a bigfoot type creature, something that's clearly not
human but clearly is also present here.
Speaker 1: But others using that intervention hypothesis, suggests he was something
more manufactured.
Speaker 2: More sinister, perhaps, as the sources spiculate, an extraterrestrial or
a human abomination, a half alien, half human creature.
Speaker 1: A genetic experiment that either went wrong or was specifically
designed as this terrifying super soldier.
Speaker 2: Precisely, his presence was so unnatural, so terrifying, that David
had to vanquish him. It wasn't just a battle, it
was about eliminating this non standard, perhaps engineered creature that
threatened the new human order. It suggests these massive, unusual
beings have been popping up throughout our recorded history, not
just in some distant folklore.
Speaker 1: So we've got this pattern building prehistoric survivors, blending with
theories of ancient alien engineering. Let's shift now to a
more modern phenomenon where mysterious creatures and unexplained technology seem
to intersect at very specific geological locations. We're going to
Elizabeth Lake in southern California.
Speaker 2: Elizabeth Lake is a fascinating place. The Spanish settlers called
it Laguna del Diablo.
Speaker 1: The Devil's late exactly.
Speaker 2: And its location is key. It sits directly on top
of the San Andreas Fault at a powerful junction of
tectonic plates. You're talking about a place with immense inherent
seismic energy, and.
Speaker 1: The local history is just steeped in this unexplained terror.
From the mid seventeen hundreds up to the late eighteen hundreds,
something was plaguing the ranchers there.
Speaker 2: They had a legend that the devil kept his pet
at the bottom of the lake and that it would
come out through a portal, which is their way of
trying to rationalize something they just.
Speaker 1: Could not explain, and what were they seeing.
Speaker 2: The ranchers who settled there complained constantly of a monstrous
beast It would supposedly emerge from the lake, which is
technically a sagpond created by the fault line, and it
would steal cattle, terrorize their horses, menace the people and.
Speaker 1: Their vocabulary for it. Devil's Pet, Devil's Lake was just
them trying to fit this bizarre phenomenon into the only
framework they had, the religious one.
Speaker 2: Right, the story gets really specific, and this is the
crucial part. One of the creatures they described seeing was
the thunderbird.
Speaker 1: A thunderbird, and this description was almost identical to the
creature that cowboys reported seeing over in Timstone, Arizona, around
eighteen ninety.
Speaker 2: It is, and we have this detailed account from one
rancher who finally had enough and decided he was going
to shoot this thing. He fired several shots at it.
This is what makes the account so vital. He described
the creature as being bulletproof and metallic. The bullets just
ricocheted off it.
Speaker 1: Bulletproof and metallic. Okay, that takes it out of the
world of biology and puts it squarely into technology.
Speaker 2: It does. After he shot at it, the creature flew
east and just vanished. Nobody, no feathers, nothing, just the
story of this impenetrable flying thing.
Speaker 1: So if we step back from the devil's pet legend
and look at the location again. That San Andreas fault
connection seems critical.
Speaker 2: It really does. There's a compelling theory that these major
tectonic fault lines, because the immense friction and the piece
of electric energy they can release, might act as portals
to another dimension, or at least weak spots in the
fabric of our reality.
Speaker 1: So the location itself could be an anchor point, a
place where something from somewhere else can manifest more easily.
Speaker 2: That's the idea. The energy of the fall line might
act as a sort of conduit, allowing things that shouldn't
be here to pop in and out.
Speaker 1: Let's break down that thunderbird description again, but using modern terms,
it was enormous. It made enormous.
Speaker 2: Noises, suggesting something like a jet engine not flapping wings,
and its.
Speaker 1: Eyes could literally pierce and emanate fire.
Speaker 2: So you have a giant, loud, metallic flying thing that
shoots light from its propulsion system. That whole package sounds
a lot more like some sort of craft than any
kind of bird.
Speaker 1: And this is the core of an idea the sources
call cultural tracking.
Speaker 2: Yes, let's unpack that because it's a really elegant explanation
for a lot of historical.
Speaker 1: Myths, So how does it work?
Speaker 2: Cultural tracking is the idea that these unexplained phenomenal UFOs UAP,
whatever they are, can essentially mask themselves to appear as
almost anything that the local culture can process. The phenomenon
is real, but our brains filter it through the only
mythological or linguistic lens we have.
Speaker 1: So an advanced loud flying machine shows up over nineteenth
century California. The Ranchers have no concept of jet propulsion
or advanced alloys. They know birds and they know thunder.
Speaker 2: So they see a giant metal thunder making bird the
thunderbird wow. And this pattern holds up globally throughout history.
In ancient China, flying phenomena were often described as flying dragons.
In ancient Egypt, they were flying boats. For the Romans,
they were flying shields round metallic defying physics. The underlying
technology might be the same, but the interpretation is shaped
by the observer's world.
Speaker 1: And the sources have that perfect modern example to lock
it in the Native American tribes in the Southwest seeing
the first airplanes.
Speaker 2: It's the perfect case study. When the first fixed wing
air planes flew over their land. They called the metal
birds literally, and in one case in Zuni, when one
of these planes actually landed, the tribe went out and
began to worship it. They immediately integrated this piece of
unknown technology into their spiritual framework as a divine object.
It shows you how quickly our minds will slot something
advanced and inexplicable into the category of mythology.
Speaker 1: So the thunderbird legend might not be a legend about
a monster at all. It's a historical record of a
technological encounter, translated through the only language they had.
Speaker 2: That's the theory, and it makes you wonder how many
of our ancient monster myths are really just misinterpreted technology.
Speaker 1: It really blurs the line between biology, technology, and mythology
until it almost disappears.
Speaker 2: And if these things can appear at fault lines, we
have to consider the other most remote, unexplored parts of
our world, the deep dark water. If a creature truly
wants to avoid detection for millennia, that's where it would go.
Speaker 1: This brings us right back to the idea of survivors
from the Great Extinction event, the one that wiped out
the dinosaurs sixty five million years ago. We know the
asteroid hit near the Yucatan Peninsula, but the question has
always been did everything die?
Speaker 2: And the answer is clearly know. We have irrefutable evidence
of relic species. The Koala camp, for example, a fish
everyone thought went extinct with the dinosaurs until we found
one alive and well in nineteen thirty eight.
Speaker 1: Right an alligators, sharks, turtles, They're all from that same era.
Speaker 2: They survived exactly. The fact that these species are still
with us gives real credence to the belief that, quoting
the sources, ancient prehistoric monsters are still living in remote
areas of the world right down to today. Biological persistence
is a proven fact.
Speaker 1: And there's no more famous example of this idea than
the Lochness monster Nissi.
Speaker 2: The accounts go back a long, long way. The first
significant sighting is dated to five sixty five AD.
Speaker 1: With the Irish monk sink Columba.
Speaker 2: That's the one the story goes. He comes across some
locals burying a man who had been killed by a
water beast in the lock. So Columba, to show his power,
sends one of his own followers to swim in the water.
All move very and sure enough, the great beast emerges
ready to attack, but Columba makes the sign of the
cross and commands it not to harm the man, and
supposedly the beast was terrified and fled back into the depths.
Speaker 1: Which immediately puts NeSSI into this weird, semi religious context.
It's not just an animal, it's an entity that can
be commanded by faith.
Speaker 2: It is, But if we set the folklor aside for
a moment and just look at the lock itself, you
couldn't design a better hiding place for a surviving prehistoric creature.
Speaker 1: Geographically it's perfect.
Speaker 2: It's immense, twenty three miles long a mile wide, and
it's deep, over eight hundred feet deep in places, and
the water is very very dark and dense. It's stained
with pete, so visibility is almost zero.
Speaker 1: So a large air breathing creature like a plesiosaur could
live there and sort of bypass detection because it wouldn't
need to surface very often.
Speaker 2: It's the perfect self contained ecosystem for a creature to
just survive unnoticed.
Speaker 1: So the big question is is NeSSI a dinosaur remnant, or,
as the sources ask, is it something which is out.
Speaker 2: Of this world, and you have to ask that because
you can't ignore the other phenomena reported around the lock.
There are a significant number of UFO sightings over the
lock itself. Really oh yeah, strange brightly lit objects seen hovering,
sometimes diving into the water or emerging from it, things
that are definitely not conventional aircraft.
Speaker 1: So, just like Elizabeth Lake, we have this junction point,
a physical anomaly, the deep dark Lock, and the presence
of both a mysterious creature and mysterious aerial phenomena.
Speaker 2: It suggests lock nests might be another one of these
locations where the boundaries are just thinner, and it connects
NeSSI to this whole global category of mythological sea beasts.
Are they all just surviving dinosaurs or is something else
going on?
Speaker 1: Let's start with the big one, the Leviathan.
Speaker 2: The Leviathan is described in so many ancient texts as
this colossal serpent or dragon or crocodile like beast. Its
domain is specifically the deepest, most unknown parts of the ocean.
Speaker 1: It lurks in the abyss, and.
Speaker 2: In some traditions it's described as the gatekeeper to a
portal to Hell at the bottom of the sea. Which
suggests that the deepest, high pressure parts of our oceans
might hold entities that are well not from our known
biological tree. Maybe they're literally guarding something.
Speaker 1: Then you have the Greek hydra, which is just a
biological nightmare, complete nightmare.
Speaker 2: This multi headed sea serpent, a descendant of the earth
goddess Gaya, and this story of Hercules fighting it is
so detailed.
Speaker 1: He learns pretty quickly that just fighting it normally doesn't work.
Speaker 2: It's a disaster. Every time he slices off one of
his heads, two more grow back in its place. This
isn't normal healing. This is some kind of radical, accelerated
regeneration that just defies biology.
Speaker 1: He only succeeds when his nephew gives him the idea
to use fire to cauterize the next stump after each cut.
Speaker 2: And that detail, the absolute need for fire to stop
the process is what makes it so strange. It implies,
as the sources say, a category of creature you would
expect not to see.
Speaker 1: This doesn't sound natural, no, which is.
Speaker 2: Why the sources suggest the hydra could be an example
of something that was genetically engineered or which genetically went wrong.
A runaway experiment. Maybe that was so terrifyingly hard to
kill it became a legend.
Speaker 1: And finally you have the kraken, the Scandinavian legend that's
all about pure unimaginable scale.
Speaker 2: The kraken was said to be the size of a
small island. Sailors were afraid of it, not just because
it might attack them, but because they might accidentally crash
into it.
Speaker 1: And the real danger was what happened when it moved.
Speaker 2: The secondary effect if a beast that size suddenly submerged,
the displacement of water would create such a great whirlpool
that it could pull a ship under. It's another one
of these persistent global legends of monstrous biological forces surviving
in the deep.
Speaker 1: So we have covered some absolutely remarkable gaps. We started
with a few tief and medicine shop the reality of Gigantopithecus, and.
Speaker 2: That led us straight to the global legend of sasquatch
and even to the Sumerian myth of angki Do the
engineered slave.
Speaker 1: From there we dove into the radical theory that maybe
we Homo sapiens are the real engineered product the alien hybrids.
Speaker 2: Which reframes creatures like Bigfoot as the original, untainted intelligence
of this planet, just watching us from the sidelines.
Speaker 1: We tracked the thunderbird over the San Andres Fault and
saw how a metallic bulletproof craft can become a flying
dragon or a flying shield through the lens of cultural.
Speaker 2: Tracking, and we ended in the deep dark water, plausible
prehistoric survivors in lockness and genetically aberate nightmares like the hydro,
maybe even guarding portals in the deep ocean.
Speaker 1: When you connect all these sources, they paint a picture
of a hidden history, a world where biology, ancient mythology,
and maybe even extraterrestrial tech are all tangled together.
Speaker 2: The common thread through all of it sasquad which Goliath
the Hydra, is the sheer persistence of the stories. They
all point to the idea that some form of non human,
intelligent or maybe engineer life has always been here, coexisting
with us, just out of sight.
Speaker 1: It's hard to dismiss, and.
Speaker 2: The sources believe that eventually we won't have to that
with our technology getting better and better, we will eventually
find quote real, irrefutable evidence of the existence of these creatures.
The truth might be waiting in the legends. We were
always told to.
Speaker 1: Ignore, which leaves us with a final pretty provocative thought.
If all this evidence of ancient contact and genetic alteration
is even partly true, and if the creatures we call
monsters are just the ones who escape that whole experiment,
then here's the question. What original, untampered evolutionary path was
humanity truly meant to follow before that intervention, And what
part of our modern behavior, our conflicts, our societies, our fears,
still echoes the instincts of those original brute humanoids that
the aliens supposedly found and changed forever.
Speaker 2: It's a big question. We want to hear what stands
out to you. Head over the comments and let us
know your thoughts.