Speaker 1: What's going on?
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It
is heard live every day from noon to three on
WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content
like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily
show prep with all the links, become a patron, go
to dpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the subscribe button.
Get every episode for free right to your smartphone or tablet.
And again, thank you so much for your support. Yesterday
you may have been listening, well, I should say you
should have been listening to Brett Winterbles Show three to
six on WBT here and he mentioned the burn bags story,
the burn bags. If you did not hear it, first off,
shame on you listen to Brett. Second, FBI director Cash
Patel found a trove of sensitive documents related to the
origins of the Trump Russia probe that were buried in
multiple burn bags. Burn bags are the way that you
destroy documents designated as classified or above or higher. Okay,
so you stuff the stuff into a bag of some
kind of like and then you're going to torch that
bag and then destroy all of the paper or if
it's like thumb drives or whatever like it all gets destroyed.
So he finds thousands of documents in these burn bags.
And the burn bags were being held in a skiff.
Speaker 3: This is one of the was it.
Speaker 2: Secret compartmentalized facilities something yeah, something like yeah, skiff. It's
like you're not allowed to bring a phone in there.
You're not allowed to take pictures of anything, you know, whatever,
Like you can go in and look at something. It's
a secure location to look at stuff.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: This was in the FBI, and it was an unknown skiff.
They stumbled upon this secret room and they find all
these burn bags, and upon finding the burn bags, they
start looking through the stuff and in the burn bag
is the classified annex or you know, supporting documentation that
was deleted out of Special Counsel John Durham's final report.
That's what is now being released today. That's what people
are coming through right now, is this annex and the
annex is the smoking gun. They failed to burn it. See,
if you had put Hillary Clinton in charge, you know,
she would have deleted all of those things like that
would have been But apparently, you know, nobody thought in
the Biden camp to put her in charge of the FBI,
like that would have been the dj like that would
have been the way to get rid of all the evidence.
Speaker 1: But for.
Speaker 2: That mistake or that overlooking of it, like I don't know,
I'd be very curious to hear the story of this
secret skiff and how it was how it came to
be that all of these documents got loaded into this
room and people forgot about it. Maybe they didn't know,
or maybe somebody put it in there to protect it
if nobody, like, like, how many people knew of this
skiff because they said it was a previously undisclosed skiff.
So but for those bags not being burned as they
probably should have been, I don't know. If there's like
a timeline that, like, you know, message retention, your email
policy at work or something, you got to hold onto
this stuff for a certain period of time, I don't know.
But whatever the reason is, those bags were still in
existence when Cash Bettel walked in the door and somehow
they found this secret skiff, and that's why we've got
the Durham the annex to the Durham Report. I think
about all of the things that could have occurred that
would have prevented this this annex from ever seeing the
light of day. Right, First off, Trump, you know what,
if he didn't win, right, you'd have another Democrat administration
in there, and they would you know, they probably would
have got around to burning it all. It's just it's
pretty amazing. So that's what got released now. I remember
reading this.
Speaker 3: At the time.
Speaker 2: This was a couple of months ago, I want to say,
when Cash Bettel was on the Joe Rogan podcast and
he had mentioned that he had found these burn bigs.
So this has been a while in the making. They
found the bags and they had to go through them all,
and that's why today they're being dumb now. But there's
redactions in there to protect sources and methods and such.
Betel staff is also working to turn more over to Congress.
Patel has been instrumental in unraveling the alleged Russia collusion narrative.
He previously served as the chief investigator in the congressional
probe into alleged Trump Russia collusion. He uncovered suspected government
surveillance abuse that led to the appointment of the two
special councils, Robert Muller and John Durham. Muller determined there
was no collusion, and Durham concluded that the entire premise
of the FBI's original investigation was bogus. Cash Betel served
as senior counsel and a national security advisor on the
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence also referred to as
HIPSIE HPSCI. He was the chief investigator when Representative Devin
Nunez was the chairman. Newon, as you'll recall, was the
guy who walked over to the Trump White House after
his investigators, with Cash Bettel leading them, discovered the roots
of this thing and what was being cooked up and
went to tell Donald Trump. While Muller investigated, HIPSY opened
its own investigation into alleged Trump Russia collusion. In July
of twenty sixteen, during the election cycle, the FBI launched
an investigation into whether the Trump campaign was colluding with
Russia to influence the outcome of the election. That investigation
inside the bureau was crossfire Hurricane. By January of twenty seventeen,
Komy goes in and notifies Trump of the dossier known
as the Steele Dossier, that contained salacious and unverified allegations
about Trump's purported coordination with the Russian government. That, of course,
that meeting then of course gets leaked by Komi, and
that then allows media to run with this story. But
even when the Steele dossier collapsed, right when it was
debunked in legacy media outlets and Democrats were unable to
defend the Steele dossier any longer. They always fell back
to the DNC hack that we were hacked. Russia hacked us,
they hacked our emails, and they did it to help Trump.
They always fell back to that. And with the last
round of declassified documents getting dumped by Tulca Gabbard, the
Director of National Intelligence, we now know that that too
was also a lie that the intel agencies, the FBI
and the NSA, they said, there's low confidence that Russia
was involved in that at all, and there's no technical evidence.
And the only accusation that Russia was involved was coming
from CrowdStrike, which was a private firm that's basically an
appendage of the Democrat Party that they reviewed the servers
and they reviewed the email intrusion and all this, and
they said it was Russia. And when the FBI said
can we look at the servers, Democrats said no. And
when they asked CrowdStrike, hey, give us your intel or
the evidence rather that proves the Russians were involved. CrowdStrike
didn't have any and that was part of a long
term project, as the Durham Annex describes now, a long
term project that was hatched actually at the beginning of
twenty sixteen, in like January, a Clinton campaign to demonize
their words, to demonize Trump, and putin to tie them together.
They were already shopping this around. So when the hack
occurs in the summer, CrowdStrike says, oh, this will fit
nicely into this narrative it was the Russians. And then
the Steele dossier is produced, is manufactured, Oh, this will
fit nicely into this campaign, and then that makes its
way into and they all knew the Intel Agency heads
the Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, they knew it wasn't true,
but they did it enemy and at what cost?
Speaker 3: What have been the ramifications to that.
Speaker 2: Here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina.
Just a quick drive up the mountain and cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable proposal, or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins
of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Asheville and the entrance of the Great Smokey
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi grills, outdoor tables and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen cabins, six cottages,
two villas, and a great lodge with eleven king sized bedrooms.
Cabins of Ashville has the ideal spot for you for
any occasion, and they have pet friendly accommodations. Call or
text eight two eight, three six seven seventy sixty eight
or check out all there is to offer at Cabins
Offashville dot com and make memories that'll last a lifetime.
Aaron Monte is an independent journalist. He was on the
Megan Kelly Show yesterday, I think or day before, and
uh was talking about this newly declassified information that shows
about the you know, the the DNC hack and leak
operation was never connected to Russia. There was never are
evidence that connected them to that. But the intel leaders
said it was like they just rewrote this this confidence
rating from low to high and then spoke on behalf
of the entire intelligence community. And this is more contrary
to what that texter said last hour, This is more important.
This is more than just about Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: Why are we supposed to take these people's word on faith,
especially given their record, and as a journalist, I mean, look,
I'm not a Trump guy, I'm not a fan. But
it's not for unelected intelligence bureaucrats to decide, you know,
who gets to be in power, what the foreign policy
of the US is. It's for the elected president, right,
And what we saw here was just a contemptuous response
to an election in which the wrong guy in the
eyes of powerful people won and so they did work
to undermine him. And no matter where you are on
the political spectrum, you shouldn't support that.
Speaker 3: Bingo.
Speaker 2: We had an election, your guy didn't win. That doesn't
mean that you then get to kneecap his entire administration.
And so this kind of distrust not just among you know,
Democrats against Trump, but Republicans, Trump's supporters against their government,
and Americans against each other. Right, I mean, how many
Democrats sat around Thanksgiving Day tables with that Maga uncle
and made all these accusations that Trump was a Putin
stooge and a puppet of Putin? And how many jokes
did Stephen Colbert make about Donald Trump's relationship with Vladimir Putin?
Speaker 3: Trick question?
Speaker 2: The answer zero, becau Stephen Colbert doesn't actually tell jokes.
That's it's more than just about Donald Trump. At the
heart of this is an elitist He's this is what
Aaron Monte said, It's an elitist contempt for their fellow Americans.
And he is exactly right. They are contemptuous of not
just Trump, but of you if you support Trump.
Speaker 4: Because there was this partisan effort, you know, started by
Hillary Clinton, to frame Trump as a Russian asset and
blame Russia for his election.
Speaker 3: Rather than look at the.
Speaker 4: Clinton wings own dysfunctions, their own failures, everybody went along
with it, and we're still paying the price because now,
you know, people still want answers, and you know, Trump voters,
especially were you know, dismissed with contempt as malleable dupes
who were brainwashed by Russia into not voting for you know,
saintly Hillary Clinton. And so there's also this elitist contempt
underpins all this. So accordingly, people in the media don't
want to be embarrassed for going along with a massive scam,
and that's why we're it's still very difficult to get
account and that's why they're still not reporting on the
countervailing facts, the low confidence assessment from the FBA. In
the NSCA, no one ever acknowledged the CrowdStrike. The Clinton
campaign contractor had admitted under oath they had no evidence
of Russian hacking and leaking.
Speaker 3: No one, no one. They don't report it.
Speaker 2: Journalism is about covering a story with a pillow until
it stops moving. Like that's like, that's the now more
than ever true axiom. The Mueller investigation mate said in
this interview, it's a very lengthy interview runs.
Speaker 3: I think the.
Speaker 2: Show itself was like two hours, and his interview took
up over an hour. I think of that program, the
Megan Kelly Show. So I'm just giving you the highlights here.
But he said at one point that the Mueller investigation
was launched to make this narrative look credible, and that's
why you ended up with those, you know, the charges
of some random guys in Russia, you know, and it's like,
what were they doing. They they spread some memes on Facebook,
like that's what we're that's the result, and you can't
even extradite them whatever. But that was the point. It
was to lend some degree of credibility to this narrative
that was cooked up by the Clinton campaign, and then
they handed it off to the intelligence agencies, especially after
they lost the election. Right then the intel chiefs they
continue down this path. And the ramifications here were Global
says Mate.
Speaker 4: The indictment of George Popadopolis and Harder Page and Michael Flynn.
Michael Flynn who was accused of lying to the FBI
about discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador, when if you
actually read the transcript of this wiretap conversation, they're not
even talking about sanctions, talking about the fact that Obama
had kicked out a bunch of Russian diplomats, and all
Flynn basically said was, listen, We're going to come in soon.
Things will be different. So don't retaliate, you know, too harshly,
because we want to have good relations. We don't want
this to go out at hand. That's all he said.
And he gets indicted and he's forced to resign. He's
basically sabotaged by the FBI and all this, and they
actually this was it's pretty well established that this was
a deliberate effort. So, I mean, there's so much malpractice here,
so much deception.
Speaker 3: And it was again, no matter where you think.
Speaker 4: About Donald Trump, why do we accept the intrusion of
the national security state into the democratic process? And geopolitically,
it had many consequences. You know, Trump went on the
campaign trioll was talking about getting along with Russia, which
I think is a good thing. Why do we want
to have tensions with another nuclear arm power Between the
US and Russia, both countries can destroy the world many
times over, So I think it's good to have cooperation
and diplomacy with Russia, and Russia Gate basically made that impossible.
In fact, Trump even complained about that in the fall
of twenty seven teen, he said, Russia, it's going to
get people.
Speaker 2: Killed Ukraine war. Right, this is beyond this is just
beyond Trump. But let's hear what Sean has to say
about it. Hello, Seawan, Yo, I think Shawn's on mute.
Check your phone, Sean, I think you're on mute. You've
muted yourself because I it sounds like I can hear
something there.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Maybe he's stuck in a drive through. I don't know.
Speaker 2: Seven four, five, seven eleven ten Sean was going to
Apparently he told Nick the call screener that this is.
Speaker 3: He's gone. Yeah, he's gone.
Speaker 2: He told Nick the call screener, Well, he's the producer,
but he's also call screening right now. That this is
old news, is what he said. This is old news,
which is what democrats and media. But I repeat myself,
that's what they're saying. If they're even saying anything at
all about this, why.
Speaker 3: Shut up? That's it.
Speaker 2: That's what that is, Pete. You need to shut up
about this. Sean doesn't care if my topics are timely.
He doesn't care. Sean doesn't call in on stuff that's
you know, happening right now, which by the way Sean
three quarters of the word news is new, and what
is new is the Durham annex that just dropped today today,
that's new. So it's not old news, it's new news
or just news, right. But also part of doing journalism
and news is that you fill in the details of
a story. When a story is unfolding over a long
period of time and new details emerge, you go back
to that story and fill in the details. You create
the record. That's what's occurring right now. It has taken
nine years. It's not the fault of me, and it's
not the fault of Donald Trump or any of the
people that are declassifying the stuff now. It's the fault
of the people that buried it, thinking that they had
buried it so deep nobody would find it, stuffed it
in burn bags, hidden in a secret skiff room, thinking
it would be destroyed and ooped. Somebody apparently forgot to
destroy them, and luckily we got a hold of them.
Cash Betel's FBI got a hold of it, and that's
what was published today. So no, it's not old news.
You know, stories are powerful. They help us make sense
of things, to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the
people of our past while transcending generations. They help us
process the meaning of life and our stories are told
through images and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video
started in nineteen ninety seven and Mint Hill, North Carolina.
It was the first company to provide this valuable service,
converting images, photos and videos into high quality produced slide shows,
videos and albums. The trusted, talented and dedicated team at
Creative Video will go over all of the details with
you to create a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them
off in person or mail them. They'll be ready in
a week or two. Memorial videos for your loved ones,
videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas, family vacations, birthdays,
or just your family stories all told through images. That's
what your photos and videos are. They are your life
told through the eyes of everyone around you and all
who came before you, and they will tell others to
come who you are. Visit creative video dot com. Got
some texts here from well, I don't know who. From
it says, if you were to place odds on any
big names going to jail over this hoax, what would
you place some at I think Brennan is the most vulnerable.
John Brennan, former CIA director, He's the most vulnerable because
he's the one that perjured himself under oath, saying that
the Steele dossier did not inform the intelligence community assessment,
when in fact it did, which we just found out
last week. Old news regarding the Durham annex that dropped
today newly declassified. If it's so bad, why didn't John
Durham charge anybody with anything? I'm assuming he knew about
this information. That's a fair question. Let's ask John Durham.
Let's get him in there. Did you know about this?
What did you know?
Speaker 3: What did you see?
Speaker 2: Why didn't you include this whatever? Yeah, that's the next
that's the next part of the investigation. If you want
to hold people accountable with criminal charges, that's what people
keep saying, right, people need to go to jail, and
I agree, But this is part of that process. You've
got to get this all out there. You've got to
get the investigative pieces correct. Aaron Matte was asked, was
this ordered by Barack Obama or did it come from
Brennan and Obama just agreed to it. We're not really sure.
Here's Monte said.
Speaker 4: Obama to me was pretty malleable. So I don't know
to what extent this is Obama running the show or
just Obama standing down to John Brennan and Hillary Clinton.
But regardless, Obama's fingerprints are on this. And if you
look at the timeline September twelfth, we now know this
has just come up from Tulca, gabberd NSA, FBI say
they have low confidence in the Russia hackge Hacking League allegation. Okay,
October seventh, Even though that's the view of the FBI
and NSA, Obama gets the Department of Homeland Security and
the Director of the National Intelligence to put out a
statements saying the intelligence community has high confidence that Russia
is behind the hacking, contradicting what the FBI NSA were concluding.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: Also, keep in mind State Department Intelligence, and the Pentagon
were excluded from this assessment. Yet the Obama administration came
out and said this is what the intelligence agency, the
intelligence community agrees with high confidence, and it wasn't true.
They did not agree and there was not high confidence.
If the FBI UH was originally dissenting, they originally said
no low confidence NSA said low confidence, then why did
they flip? And like, how do you explain Jim comey Right,
here's Mante's.
Speaker 3: Guests on that.
Speaker 4: At the time, they were relying on CrowdStrike to investigate
the DNC server hacking, and Crowdstrke wasn't cooperating. And I suspect,
you know, obviously someone like Peter Struck, who was the
lead FBI agent on Crossfire Hurricane, he was all on
board with framan Trump as a Russian agent. You know,
there's text messages of him disparaging Trump, disparaging Trump voters,
his bio and also talking about the Russians is you know,
f and savages. So you know, his view is pretty clear.
Not everybody and the FBI was on board with this.
And I think what happened with Comy this So Comy
after Trump wins, he gets blamed because of his handling
of the Clinton email investigation when he came out right
before the election and talked about the FBI going back
into the laptop and uncovering the Anthony Wiener stuff. So
Comy is under a lot of fire now from the
Clinton wing. And so I think Comy being the sick
of fant that he is decided just to completely shift
gears and go along with anything that was asked of him,
and that's why we now learn he was pushing for
the Steele dossier to be included in the Selden's Community Assessment.
And funnily enough, I mean, maybe this is a coincidence,
but you know at that December ninth meeting between Obama
and his top.
Speaker 3: Principles where all of a sudden, the narrative really shifts.
Speaker 4: So you know, James James Clapper's there, John Bryan is there,
Susan Rice is there, but representing the FBI and the
NSA are not the respective heads of the FBI in
the NSA, James Comy and Mike Rodgers were not there
at that meeting. The FBI was represented by Andrew McCabe,
who was a hardcore Russier gator. He's the one who
in May of twenty seventeen opened up a new probe
of Trump while he was a sitting president as a
potential Russian asset. So mccaid is there, not Comy, and
the head of the NSA, Mike Rodgers, also was not there.
And maybe that's just a coincidence that the heads of
these dissenting agencies weren't there, or maybe they weren't there,
and they were told basically in their absence afterwards, the
fall in line.
Speaker 3: And that's at least what I think Comy did. That
makes sense.
Speaker 2: That's a plausible theory. Don't know if it's true. It's
plausible though. Remember also Brennan was shopping the Steele dossier
to members of Congress. I talked about this last week,
And remember Mitch McConnell rejected the Steele dossier and Harry
Reid did not. In fact, Harry Reid wrote a letter
to Obama saying, you need to investigate this right. This
needs to get into the bloodstream. And remember it was
Harry Reid who famously said, after he had smeared Mitt Romney, said, oh,
he hasn't filed his tax returns and all of that.
And then it turned out that that was a lie.
He had file tax returns and everything. And what did
Harry Reid say after the election Romney lost? He said
they didn't win, did he? In other words, the ends
justify the means. I will smear somebody like this if
it means they don't get power. Mate called this a
propaganda campaign. That's what this was. And then he used
a term that I've been using for years blue anon.
You've heard QAnon, right, the conspiracy theories on the right,
and everybody's like, oh, those QAnon.
Speaker 3: And all that.
Speaker 2: Well, Democrats suffer their own conspiracy theories as well. This
was like prime example number one, bluing on and there
were damaging effects to the body politic It increased political polarization,
It undermined confidence in our institutions and law enforcement.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: I don't think you get J six without this. All right,
if you're listening to this show, you know I try
to keep up with all sorts of current events, and
I know you do too, And you've probably heard me
say get your news from multiple sources. Why Well, because
it's how you detect media bias, which is why I've
been so impressed with ground News. It's an app and
it's a website, and it combines news from around the
world in one place so you can compare coverage and
verify information. You can check it out at check dot ground,
dot news slash pete. I put the link in the
podcast description too. I started using ground News a few
months ago and more recently chose to work with them
as an affiliate because it lets me see clearly how
stories get covered and by whom. The blind spot feature
shows you which stories get ignored by the left and
the right. See for yourself. Check Dot Ground, dot News
slash Pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll get fifteen
percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage plan to
get unlimited access to every feature. Your subscription then not
only helps my podcast, but it also supports Ground News
as they make the media landscape more transparent. Let's jump
over to the phones and chat with Ray. Hello, Ray,
Welcome to the program.
Speaker 1: Hey Tell, I'm just calling in to say that we
can't save this republic and make it better without everybody
rowing in the same direction. We've got people now in
the lifeboat, some rowing back towards the Titanic, some rowing away,
and what we need is to persuade everyone to row
away from it. And you know, I would ask people
like shown to have an open mind and look at
this for what it is, which is an attack on
not on Democrats, but on our republic. And also people
need to remember that, you know, like the ten percent
that would have voted for Trump had been known about
the truth about the laptop and now this this information
coming out about the Russia hoax. You know, they've got
to realize that this is for the republic. It's not
for one party or the other.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, you're exactly right, right, this goes well beyond
Donald Trump, Like, it's not about him, it's about the
intelligence leadership colluding with one political party in order to
undermine the will of dare I say it?
Speaker 3: The democracy? Right? Like?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I mean we hear this all the time from the
Democrats about how the democracy is at stake and everything.
Yet this is a this is a fundamental attack on
the democratic process. People put somebody in office to set
policy and do these things, and you didn't like it.
So you, as the intel leadership, you're just going to
create fake stories about this guy and you're going to
promote them as if they're true in order to undermine
his presidency. That then usurps the will of the people
that put him there.
Speaker 1: And one of one of the things people might real quick.
You know a lot of people love their side and
they're not about to see with an open mind the
other person's side. But I have searched myself, and as
much as I like Donald Trump, you know, I've probably
put aside some of these personal uh indiscrepancies if he's
committed any But if I found out that he had
did what uh you know Obama or some of them did,
I would turn on him in a heartbeat.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean that's what Democrats hope the Epstein files
will do. That's why they keep pushing it. They keep
they and they're saying that all of this is a
distraction from the Epstein files.
Speaker 1: Well, that's the personal thing I was talking about. You know,
I wouldn't I'd consider that. But I mean if if
he tried to subvert our democratic process to still an
election or keep someone getting elected, that would be a
whole different matter to me than the personal things.
Speaker 2: Well, I'd say Democrats would point to January sixth and
say that he did that.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, right, you got some good points.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that's what they would say. So Ray,
I do appreciate the call. Thank you, sir, thank you
to take care. This is from a tweet from Sarah.
It's a Pete tweet. If the outgoing George W. Bush
administration had done to Barack Obama what is being alleged
to have been perpetrated by Hillary Obama and federal agencies
against Trump. The legacy media and Democrats would have a
completely different reaction. Absolutely correct. That is absolutely correct. Mike
Bens the from the Gray Zone, that's his publication and
web channel, his YouTube channel. He's a former State Department
intel guy and he's fantastic.
Speaker 1: I enjoy.
Speaker 2: Watching and reading his stuff. He just tweeted that Hillary Clinton,
based on this new information from the Durham Report annex,
Hillary Clinton is guilty of criminal conspiracy conspiring with intelligence
and White House officials to violate the CIA's Charter and
Executive Order twelve three three three, explicitly prohibiting the agency
from conducting intelligence operations against US citizens within the United States.
So those are some possible charges. Somebody asked about the
statute of limitations on perjury. I don't know what the
specific law is. I know there is a statute. I
think it's five years. But if you continue doing things
to advance that lie, like if you bury classified information
in a burn bag, let's say, and then lie about
it when the information is discovered, I think that's when
the clock would start running. To know that you had
perjured yourself, that's when the clock starts. So the clock
may now start for John Brennan right now. This from
John Solomon from Just the News. He says, this is
the smoking gun evidence inside Durham's, the Durham Annex. If
it is authenticated by further investigation, it means liberal mega
donor George Soros' team, the George Soros Open Society Foundations.
Their guy Leonard Bernardo is his name, or Lenny, and
he was in charge like Eurasia Affairs or whatever. And
there are emails and memos and stuff from him talking
about the coordination with the Clinton campaign to launch this smear.
They knew the Clinton plan. Bernardo knew the Clinton plan
for the rush Gate hoax four days before the FBI
opened its probe. Obama knew, Brendan new and Komynu. Here's
part of the memo that Bernardo wrote. He says, HRC
Hillary Rodham Clinton, HRC approved Julia's idea. That's one of
Hillary's advisors approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers
hampering US elections. That should distract people from her own
missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level.
The point is making the run the Olympic level he's
talking about there is Remember they were attacking Trump something
about the Olympics and his ties to shady deals with
the Olympics. I think we're in Russia. Whatever the point is,
making the Russian play a US domestic issue, say something
like a critical infrastructure threat for the election to feel menace,
since both Potis and Vice Potus have acknowledged the fact
that the intelligence community would speed up searching for the
evidence that is regrettably still unavailable. According to data from
the election campaign headquarters of Hillary Clinton obtained via the
US Sorels Foundation, Clinton approved a plan of her policy
advisor Juliana Smith to smear Trump by magnifying the scandal
tied to the intrusion by the Russian special services in
the pre election process to benefit the Republican candidate. They
say this was a long term campaign, that this would
this demonization campaign would be a long term campaign. And
then they said that the intel agencies would add quote
oil to the fire.
Speaker 3: The Russians knew that.
Speaker 2: All right, that'll do it for this episode. Thank you
so much for listening. I could not do the show
without your support and the support of the businesses that
advertise on the podcast. So if you'd like, please support
them too and tell them you heard it here. You
can also become a patron at my patreon page or
go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so much
for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.