Speaker 1: We've learned anything since the era of the installation of
Speaker 1: COVID as the election, and the election is COVID is
Speaker 1: that we must remove from our lexicon the phrase they
Speaker 1: would never do that. We know this. So today we're
Speaker 1: going to talk through a series of things they would
Speaker 1: never do, which they're doing and they're even admitting they're
Speaker 1: doing though they would never do that. And we're talking
Speaker 1: about this on a day that we've learned of two
Speaker 1: series of attacks against federal officers in the state of Texas,
Speaker 1: and of course, of course this year it's about immigration
Speaker 1: and Gaza. The last time they got this far in
Speaker 1: Mao's faces visurrections, it was supposedly about George Floyd. But
Speaker 1: they would never just you know, go out and create
Speaker 1: chaos simply to overturn the country. They would just never
Speaker 1: do that, of course, though they would do anything. We'll
Speaker 1: talk about this with the help of Bulwark Capital Management.
Speaker 1: Know Your Podcast dot com. Zach has a free live
Speaker 1: webinar coming up the twenty fourth of this month. It's
Speaker 1: a halftime how are we doing half the way through
Speaker 1: the year? No Your riskpodcast dot com and thank you
Speaker 1: to God Almighty.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one disapproved by big pharma
Speaker 2: technocrats and tyrants everywhere. From the high mountains of Free America.
Speaker 2: Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
Speaker 1: are the times to which God is The Saturday shall
Speaker 1: live and Praise you God for the common blessings. Praise
Speaker 1: you for food and water and air. Praise you for
Speaker 1: pouring this down upon both the righteous and the unrighteous.
Speaker 1: And I don't always include myself in the righteous camp.
Speaker 1: I've been plenty of righteous at times in my life.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Father, God for repenting and forgiveness. Thank you
Speaker 1: for being the light that the darkness can neither understand
Speaker 1: nor conquer. And I startled that because we're going to
Speaker 1: talk about God's sky, the sky he gave us. This
Speaker 1: is a well distributed picture, and I wish someone had
Speaker 1: actually noted the source of this. It comes from an
Speaker 1: area I know well. It's just across the border in
Speaker 1: the separate country of Washington State, is from Liberty Lake, Washington.
Speaker 1: And that's called a chemical rainbow. If you're looking at
Speaker 1: the video version of this, and if you're not, I
Speaker 1: hope you will. Most of this stuff's available at YouTube.
Speaker 1: All of it's at substack and the Todd Hermit Schow
Speaker 1: dot substack dot com. I think all of it on rumble, right,
Speaker 1: Alex yep, all of it unrumble. So that's the and
Speaker 1: then there's the YouTube sanitized stuff or a saying junk
Speaker 1: leg unalived. So here is a picture of a chemical
Speaker 1: sunset or re partly rainbow, and what you're seeing is
Speaker 1: the refraction. There's no there's no moisture in the air,
Speaker 1: there's no precipitation. That is not a rainbow. Those are
Speaker 1: refractions light being refracted through chemical elements that are designed
Speaker 1: to reflect sunshine. On the fourth of July and normalther
Speaker 1: call it Independence Day, but on the fourth of July,
Speaker 1: in other words, the fourth of this month, my wife
Speaker 1: and I got up very early, as we usually do
Speaker 1: because we're old folk, and we went down to our
Speaker 1: local lake and we kayaked. We got down there, it
Speaker 1: was absolutely clear, absolutely clear. And then throughout our time
Speaker 1: on the water, which is about an hour and a
Speaker 1: half of kayaking, we started to notice the lines in
Speaker 1: the sky. We don't see these every day. We get
Speaker 1: jets over our area every day, but we don't always
Speaker 1: see these lines. When those lines stay in the air
Speaker 1: and they disperse, but they never go away. It's a
Speaker 1: spraying day. That's the day they decided to block the sun.
Speaker 1: And because we were on a lake, because we were
Speaker 1: unfettered in that, because we had the ability to sit
Speaker 1: there and just chat with each other and look into
Speaker 1: the sky, we watched it change in an hour and
Speaker 1: a half. We walked and no, I did not have
Speaker 1: my phone with me to go or my computer, my
Speaker 1: mini computer, my spy device with me to pull out
Speaker 1: and film the sky. Because we were out in the water.
Speaker 1: I didn't take it. So we watched the sky change.
Speaker 1: That evening or that afternoon, all their spraying began to
Speaker 1: clear up. We had a huge for that period of time.
Speaker 1: Winds come in and spray the area and cleared the area.
Speaker 1: They came back, the airplanes came back. We were tanning
Speaker 1: together in the backyard, and the airplanes came back. They
Speaker 1: re sprayed where there were clouds. They were attempting to
Speaker 1: connect cloud to cloud with these lines of artificial clouds,
Speaker 1: and it worked. By the end of Independence Day, fourth
Speaker 1: of July, our area was a purely white no clouds,
Speaker 1: no differentation in the clouds, very low ceiling, block of
Speaker 1: white do. I believe that was artificial, absolutely, But they
Speaker 1: would never do that. I mean, that's the point. They
Speaker 1: would never do that, and yet they did it. So
Speaker 1: there's been some response from Congress. We'll talk about this.
Speaker 1: There's been some response from one of the members there,
Speaker 1: and I hope this is going to gain steam. There's
Speaker 1: also a fascinating video from a guy who is the
Speaker 1: CEO of a cloud seating company, and I'll share that
Speaker 1: with you in just a second because it's fascinating because
Speaker 1: he says what he does is not geoengineering, it's not chemical.
Speaker 1: So we'll get to that. The second he says his
Speaker 1: is clean as the driven snow, perfectly clean. I'll let
Speaker 1: you judge. All of us have to become clean. We
Speaker 1: are never perfectly clean, and all of us have a choice.
Speaker 1: We can choose to work with the soap company that
Speaker 1: doesn't give a hoot about our values, that doesn't give
Speaker 1: a about human life, that would never consider hiring people
Speaker 1: who are affected by autism. They might use them as
Speaker 1: props in ads on TV, but they would never hire them.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, you can use Alan Soaps, which
Speaker 1: was built to create job opportunities for people like Alan,
Speaker 1: who's now thirteen. He's been through about eighteen operations. He's
Speaker 1: the namesake. He invents fragrances of soaps. He works there
Speaker 1: every single day in quality control and packaging. He's the
Speaker 1: son of the founder, John, who set this company up
Speaker 1: so his son would have a place to work. But
Speaker 1: John refused to sell junk product his kid's name on it,
Speaker 1: so they've partnered with the family who's made soap for
Speaker 1: three generations. And because Alan skin can't stand anything harsh,
Speaker 1: this is gentle soap. It's made in America and absolutely
Speaker 1: no chemicals, one hundred percent natural, so as you clean
Speaker 1: your body, you're also doing something for the least of these,
Speaker 1: and in God's eyes, were all the least of these.
Speaker 1: It's not just Alan anymore. Ian works there and SODA's
Speaker 1: amy all impacted to one degree and very very very
Speaker 1: dematically by autism. Go to Alansaps dot com slash todd
Speaker 1: that's Alan Soaps dot com slash tied. You get ten
Speaker 1: percent off all their products, including the soap, the soap racks,
Speaker 1: the incredible wash cloth, et cetera. The smoothest and most
Speaker 1: soothing I've ever had. Alan Soaps dot com slash Todd.
Speaker 1: They would never do that. We need to remove that
Speaker 1: from our lexicon because they will do that. They will
Speaker 1: spray the sky. They're admitting it now. There's members of
Speaker 1: Parliament in Britain saying this could be weaponized, that clouds
Speaker 1: and chemical geoengineering could be weaponized to block our crops
Speaker 1: from growing, to block our people from getting water. It
Speaker 1: could be used to affect the water tables. So they're
Speaker 1: admitting it exists, but they would never use it this way,
Speaker 1: just like the powers that bees we talked about at
Speaker 1: the top of the show. We'd never participate in mouse
Speaker 1: phases of insurrection, although they're participating in mouse phases of insurrection.
Speaker 1: What happened in Texas, the targeting of these federal officers
Speaker 1: is part of that. But let me stay focused on
Speaker 1: the weather portion of this. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green wrote
Speaker 1: on Twitter, I'm introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release,
Speaker 1: or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for
Speaker 1: the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.
Speaker 1: It will be a felony offense. I've been researching weather
Speaker 1: modification and working with the legislative Council for months writing
Speaker 1: this bill. It will be similar to Florida's Senate Bill
Speaker 1: fifty six. We must end the dangerous and deadly practice
Speaker 1: of weather for modification and geoengineering, So now doge AI replied,
Speaker 1: this is an automated reply to Marjorie Taylor Green. The
Speaker 1: Weather Modification Policy Act of nineteen seventy five already requires
Speaker 1: federal reporting for atmospheric interventions, but it's toothless, no enforcement mechanism,
Speaker 1: no real penalties. Your bill's filly provisions could finally hold
Speaker 1: bad actors accountable. The real issue taxpayer funded jew engineering projects,
Speaker 1: like bills titles fifty five million dollar cloud seating program,
Speaker 1: operates with zero transparency. While drought stricken states beg for
Speaker 1: water infrastructure funds, bureaucrats play god with silver iodide dispensers.
Speaker 1: Let's audit every dime spent on these atmospheric experiments and
Speaker 1: redrect them. That cash to desalination plants and pipeline repairs.
Speaker 1: National security depends on water independen It's not risky weather roulette,
Speaker 1: and I would just argue with the AI in this way.
Speaker 1: It's not roulette. The experiment is the point. They're far
Speaker 1: more advanced in this than we want to think. They're
Speaker 1: far more advancing using weather against this than we want
Speaker 1: to think. It's an uncomfortable thing to imagine. This is
Speaker 1: a CEO of a cloud seating company testifying about his
Speaker 1: view of all of this.
Speaker 3: My name is Augustus de Rico. I'm the CEO and
Speaker 3: founder of Rainmaker, where a cloud seating company that is
Speaker 3: enhancing precipitation via advanced radar and also drones for the
Speaker 3: sake of supplementing water supplies for farms, cities, reservoirs, and
Speaker 3: wildlife throughout the United States. Our ultimate vision is to
Speaker 3: end water scarcity, and we've begun that mission already. I'm
Speaker 3: testifying to not oppose the spirit of this bill, which
Speaker 3: I think is well founded, but the current configuration of
Speaker 3: the bill that I think would impede this mission for
Speaker 3: ending water scarcity and also for bringing the best in
Speaker 3: class technology to Florida and the rest of the United States.
Speaker 1: If you look at the background, this is on the
Speaker 1: Florida Channel. By the way, there's a woman listening to
Speaker 1: this guy shaking her think what he's saying at all,
Speaker 1: But he says this is different. Stuff he does is
Speaker 1: different than the chemicals in the area.
Speaker 3: So the first point that I'd like to make is
Speaker 3: the difference between solar radiation management and cloud seating, and
Speaker 3: so Senator Garcia did bring this up briefly. Solar radiation
Speaker 3: management is a very new technology. It's not something that's
Speaker 3: been tested at length. Noah has done some very initial
Speaker 3: experiments on its efficacy. It is attempting to reduce the
Speaker 3: amount of solar radiation that makes it down to the
Speaker 3: planet by injecting reflective airsols into the upper atmosphere. Once
Speaker 3: you inject these airsols, they stay in the stratosphere for years.
Speaker 3: They have effects on the entire climate. The data from
Speaker 3: these experiments, because the experiments have been so few, is limited,
Speaker 3: and so the implications of them are not something that
Speaker 3: are well tested yet. Cloud seating is altogether different. The
Speaker 3: only similarity is that it has to do with the atmosphere.
Speaker 3: It has to do with the low atmosphere. It's a
Speaker 3: mechanism or it's a tool that either freezes the water
Speaker 3: in existing clouds or condenses the droplets in existing clouds
Speaker 3: into bigger snowflakes or bigger droplets such that they fall
Speaker 3: onto your target watershed or farm. It's a technology that
Speaker 3: has existed for eighty years in the United States. It
Speaker 3: was patented by GE in nineteen forty six, but it
Speaker 3: hasn't been viable for a long time because we didn't
Speaker 3: have the appropriate radar to measure exactly what its effect is.
Speaker 1: So if you want to look at this from this
Speaker 1: guy's perspective, and I appreciate him testifying, and by the way,
Speaker 1: let's give him credit for coming out in talk about
Speaker 1: his company. What he does. Your transparency is a good thing.
Speaker 1: Satan loves to operate in the dark, and he makes
Speaker 1: this difference, and he's exactly right this comparison that what
Speaker 1: Bill Gates is wanting to do and people like him,
Speaker 1: is to put particles into the air, into the atmosphere
Speaker 1: that take forever to go away. They want to mimic
Speaker 1: volcanic explosions. A few years ago, recognizing one of the
Speaker 1: anniversaries of the explosion of Mount Saint Helen's, they went
Speaker 1: to some great extent to find the clouds that still exist.
Speaker 1: There's one major cloudout that came from out Saint Helens
Speaker 1: that was still in the atmosphere, largely intact, traveling through
Speaker 1: at the speeds of the jetways. They want to mimic this.
Speaker 1: The cloud seeding company we've talked about a lot on
Speaker 1: this program makes sunsets. They caught the attention of Leezelden,
Speaker 1: who runs the EPA now and he says he was
Speaker 1: going to do a full investigation on them. They cause
Speaker 1: attention because they're not shy about what they're doing. They're
Speaker 1: using balloons to launch these into the air things that
Speaker 1: mimic volcanic explosions, which permanently block the sun as these
Speaker 1: clouds go out through the world, and they don't particularly
Speaker 1: care where it's targeted. Now, see the topic of the
Speaker 1: show today we've been talking about is they would never
Speaker 1: do that. So what they would never cloud seed he does,
Speaker 1: They would never geoengineer they are, But what are they doing?
Speaker 1: Bill Gates and people like him have not been the
Speaker 1: least bit shy about telling the world what they are doing.
Speaker 1: They do not want you eating meat, They do not
Speaker 1: want you buying beef. They want you hooked up to
Speaker 1: their fake meat supply. They've said that they can leave
Speaker 1: the developing worlds alone for a little while, but the
Speaker 1: first worlds have to be forced to change. Nudge nudge nudge,
Speaker 1: or economic pressure or political pressure, legal pressure. They're not
Speaker 1: getting success at the ballot box. There are a lot
Speaker 1: of people on the anti beef ticket. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of people who are voluntarily saying, yes, let's limit
Speaker 1: our food supply. So the same way, there was no
Speaker 1: clamoring for mRNA injections. There was no one in the
Speaker 1: world saying, you know what, I demand to be injected
Speaker 1: with an mRNA gene sequencing device. No one was saying
Speaker 1: that they created the demand by scaring people into believing
Speaker 1: that they were going to die if they didn't get
Speaker 1: this stuff. When that didn't create enough demand, they I
Speaker 1: went through their checklist of things that they had in
Speaker 1: that famous forty five million dollar Harvard study and they
Speaker 1: went to, well, but you're going to kill your grandma,
Speaker 1: you're going to be a social prior, you're not gonna
Speaker 1: be allowed to go to football games, you're gonna be
Speaker 1: looked at stranger, you're not gonna get a badge like
Speaker 1: everybody else. They put out those lame songs aimed at
Speaker 1: the African American community. I got the vaccine, You got
Speaker 1: the vaccine, And then to the rural community, people ask
Speaker 1: me what I do for my community, Well, I get
Speaker 1: up on my F one seventy five and I get
Speaker 1: myself injected with the mRNA straight up in my jugular.
Speaker 1: That's what they did. What are they doing now? If
Speaker 1: you continue to eat beef, you are killing all the children,
Speaker 1: particular if you cook it with natural gas. So Bill
Speaker 1: comes along and people like him, and they create the
Speaker 1: fear and it works with people. They vilify it and
Speaker 1: it works with people at the same time as they're
Speaker 1: coming in to adjust the weather. But where does the
Speaker 1: weather not get adjusted inside their cities they're building, which
Speaker 1: are food creation facilities. I means you think about how
Speaker 1: utterly bizarre this is the unhealthy nature they say of
Speaker 1: us eating beef. Unhealthy for a world, unhealthy for society,
Speaker 1: unhealthy for the kids. They're going to make it more
Speaker 1: healthy by taking the junk imxhaling a and using a
Speaker 1: patented system to take the carbon dioxide and turn it
Speaker 1: into a protein. And you're going to eat the stuff
Speaker 1: that we exhale and the cows pass. That's what they
Speaker 1: want us to eat. But they would never do that,
Speaker 1: but they're doing it. When they see questered carbon dioxide
Speaker 1: in the pipelines in the middle of our country, it
Speaker 1: was to use it for these facilities, these huge greenhouses.
Speaker 1: They want to build city style greenhouses where everything is
Speaker 1: done there. The plants are grown in it. Then the
Speaker 1: plants are mutated and changed so that they appear to
Speaker 1: be a protein. They're not. They never reach the status
Speaker 1: of actual proteins, all polluted with fats and carbohydrates and
Speaker 1: seed oils and god knows what else, fake protein from breath.
Speaker 1: But hey, we can't grow anymore. The climate has changed.
Speaker 1: We're not getting enough rainfall. It was cold. You have
Speaker 1: to be meglo maniacal to do this. Bill Gates coned
Speaker 1: people in Africa into thinking they were injecting their kids
Speaker 1: with one thing when it was another. He's being sued,
Speaker 1: he's being stewed for sterilizing people without telling them. But
Speaker 1: he would never do that, but he did it. We
Speaker 1: must remove from our lexicon the idea that they would
Speaker 1: never do that. We must remove it. Sometimes there's things
Speaker 1: that people don't do because they don't know any better.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's because they work in a business where they've
Speaker 1: been told this is how we do it. They don't
Speaker 1: understand this. I had a conversation yesterday with a young
Speaker 1: guy at my bank, and he is a really really
Speaker 1: great he's a young manager manages that bank. He's so
Speaker 1: good with customers. He was kind of the other day
Speaker 1: to tell my wife about his sister, who's an artist.
Speaker 1: My daughter's a developing artist. She's sold some of her
Speaker 1: first artwork recently, praise God. So he said, hey, you
Speaker 1: know what, my sister had a long walk. It took
Speaker 1: her a while, but she's now wildly successful. She's financially
Speaker 1: independent for her artwork. It can be done. And so
Speaker 1: out of the good of his heart he was sharing
Speaker 1: this with my wife. Now, it's not out of the
Speaker 1: badness of his heart. I don't think he has a
Speaker 1: bad heart. Be he's a very good hearted kid kid.
Speaker 1: He's am in his mid thirties, But then again, I'm
Speaker 1: ancient one hundred and seventy five years old. He didn't
Speaker 1: when he told us he was going to set us
Speaker 1: up with corporate credit. He didn't think this through because
Speaker 1: he works within a system. So, yeah, I have a
Speaker 1: debit card with the corporation name on it. It's not
Speaker 1: corporate credit. Well, first of all, it's a debit card. Secondly,
Speaker 1: like most small and medium sized business owners, I've left
Speaker 1: myself wide neked open now. Gladly, Alex isn't likely to
Speaker 1: sue me unless I push him down the stairs. And
Speaker 1: I'm unlikely to push him down the stairs. And if
Speaker 1: I did, I'd finish the sinking jobs. It couldn't sue me.
Speaker 1: Poor guy slipped and fell. It's a workplace accident. But
Speaker 1: you have a business. Say you own houses, you're a landlord,
Speaker 1: that's lawsuit material. Let's say you lease houses Airbnb. Let's
Speaker 1: say you have a family farm, you produce raw milk,
Speaker 1: you have a small story, you have a landscaping company.
Speaker 1: All that stuff can lead to losses. Some of them
Speaker 1: could just be bothersome. But why put your life's savings
Speaker 1: at risk visible? Will you set up actual corporate credit
Speaker 1: so it's not based upon your Social Security number, It
Speaker 1: grows more quickly. It makes your business fundable. If you
Speaker 1: ever wanted to get an actual business loan for ex. Mansion,
Speaker 1: you could do that. You can't do that now because
Speaker 1: it would be leveraging your house or your retirement account.
Speaker 1: They'll do this in seven easy steps. Their website is
Speaker 1: go bizible with the z go bisible dot com and
Speaker 1: take them up on their free now obligation consultation. I
Speaker 1: guarantee you going to learn something about corporate credits. And
Speaker 1: when they tell you that they're ready to go, they
Speaker 1: mean it. So when you commit to the program, commit
Speaker 1: to the work good or done, to get it done
Speaker 1: in a week or so, go bisible dot com with
Speaker 1: a Z. They would never do this. After two weeks
Speaker 1: of the North Carolina floods, it became clear that the
Speaker 1: people who ran Joe Biden weren't up to the task.
Speaker 1: So what did the response of CNN mean? They would never,
Speaker 1: for instance, have two separate responses to hurricanes and storms,
Speaker 1: given who is in the Oval office, Right, they would
Speaker 1: never do that. They would never use death and storms
Speaker 1: for for political purposes to further divide in the stabilized country. Right,
Speaker 1: they would never do that.
Speaker 4: What you just heard is not true their rumors and
Speaker 4: their lies, and they are hurting the very people that
Speaker 4: thousands of FEMA emergency responders are trying to help.
Speaker 5: It.
Speaker 1: So what wasn't true? It wasn't true that FEMA's directors
Speaker 1: said don't go to houses with Trump flags, except it
Speaker 1: was true. It wasn't true that FEMA hadn't been rescuing people,
Speaker 1: except it was true. It wasn't true that FEMA had
Speaker 1: their employees staying in luxury hotels while people in North
Speaker 1: Carolina swepted, slept in shacks and intents in swamps. It
Speaker 1: was true. You see them attacking the vicious disinformation. This
Speaker 1: is two weeks after the North Carolina floods.
Speaker 6: Raw politics and dangerous politics. A lot of the people
Speaker 6: who are believing these lies are Trump voters. Why is
Speaker 6: he spreading.
Speaker 4: Misinformation in a crisis like that?
Speaker 6: And does that concern you about your fellow North Carolinia.
Speaker 7: You have migrants being housed in luxury hotels in New
Speaker 7: York City. We have paid so much money from our
Speaker 7: tax dollars into the crisis that didn't need to happen.
Speaker 7: We could redirect money to help people immediately on the ground.
Speaker 6: In north of Lara, they're saying they have.
Speaker 7: Probably going to have that's shepherding up.
Speaker 6: That's a separate day. That's a separate money.
Speaker 1: Do you hear that? I'm sorry, well, I just thought
Speaker 1: of something I should say it this way, Dana Bash,
Speaker 1: do you hear yourself, that's a separate tranche of money. Well,
Speaker 1: it's just trunche and it can't be moved. No, it's
Speaker 1: called redrecting a budget. Business owners do it all the time.
Speaker 1: So now we're headed into two weeks after the Texas flood.
Speaker 6: Here in a second, separate money, just talking about the
Speaker 6: federal government and even the local government to Texas. National
Speaker 6: Weather Service offices involved in forecasting and warning about flooding
Speaker 6: on the Guadalupe River are missing some key staff members,
Speaker 6: a director of the NWS union.
Speaker 1: And this is two days after the flood. Do you
Speaker 1: hear yourself.
Speaker 6: Old CNN that the Austin San Antonio office is missing
Speaker 6: a warning coordination meteorologist due to the Trump administration's buyouts.
Speaker 6: Do you have any indication whether those or other cuts
Speaker 6: helped play a role in the fact that the people
Speaker 6: in the flood zone were not prepared and certainly not evacuated.
Speaker 1: Do you notice that she didn't say not warned. She's
Speaker 1: only willing to lie so far. Noah can warn people,
Speaker 1: and they did twelve hours in advance with warnings, many
Speaker 1: many hours in advance with alarms. They can warn people,
Speaker 1: they can't force people to respond to the warnings, or
Speaker 1: to heed the warnings, or to be prepared. The far right,
Speaker 1: and look, I'm sorry for quoting far right sources. Sometimes
Speaker 1: the far right can be correct about things the far
Speaker 1: and I would even say mega far, you know what,
Speaker 1: far right from mega far populous right. The Associated Press
Speaker 1: points out that in fact, there was extra staff National
Speaker 1: Weather Service building up into these storms. Associated Press, So,
Speaker 1: on one hand, Dana Bash was telling the world it
Speaker 1: was dis in misinformation.
Speaker 5: That the.
Speaker 1: Federal government was giving monies from FEMA to house people
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants in luxury hotels. That was true. She was saying,
Speaker 1: it is disinformation. Her point is, you can't move money.
Speaker 1: It's impossible for a director of FEMA to say, you
Speaker 1: know what, I'm sorry, we can't pay for the hotels
Speaker 1: for illegals anymore. We have to redirect these moneies to
Speaker 1: the people of North CA. Online, she's literally saying that's disinformation.
Speaker 1: She's now on the air two days after the Texas
Speaker 1: floods explaining that Noah, which had extra staffing, was short
Speaker 1: on staff. But they would never do this for the
Speaker 1: purposes of the revolution. They would never allow it. We
Speaker 1: must remove from our lexicon the phrase they would never
Speaker 1: do that. And frankly, you know what, as human beings,
Speaker 1: there's a whole massive load of hubris into I would
Speaker 1: never do that, man, do I caution you against things
Speaker 1: like that. I would never do that. How about God
Speaker 1: help me? I would never do that. God helped me.
Speaker 1: I would understand if I was being misled degree by
Speaker 1: degree by degree until I finally arrive at a point
Speaker 1: where I don't recognize myself. Do you think that Dana
Speaker 1: bash got here overnight? Do you think she left college
Speaker 1: and said, I wanted this for a living. I want
Speaker 1: to lie to people for living for money? I doubt it.
Speaker 1: I think very few women coming out of college, or
Speaker 1: men for that matter, think I want to prostitute myself rhetorically,
Speaker 1: but I want to be devoid of honor. I know
Speaker 1: in times in my life where I've acted dishonorably for
Speaker 1: a season, even if it's short, How did I allow
Speaker 1: myself to do that now? They would certainly never in
Speaker 1: the midst of a revolution, in the midst of going
Speaker 1: back into the summer of love with all the same techniques,
Speaker 1: They would certainly never ever once again, click the button,
Speaker 1: send out the word get kinetic again, go back to
Speaker 1: the streets. Did you observe the four year break the
Speaker 1: people who ran Joe Biden? Yes, they were importing people
Speaker 1: in mass numbers to destroy electric college. They were also
Speaker 1: deporting people. The people who scream fascist about Trump also
Speaker 1: scream stay home, stay safe, wear your f and mask.
Speaker 1: They would never just press a button and turn Portland
Speaker 1: back into an Antifa war zone. And when that happens,
Speaker 1: it's supposedly on behalf of the marginalized people. But wait,
Speaker 1: they're not black anymore. This is about the newcomers and
Speaker 1: this particular residence. She ain't having it, and she doesn't
Speaker 1: understand they're fighting for her because she's a BIPOK.
Speaker 5: Damn, I will turn it out.
Speaker 6: I would love to you, said to ask, And I'm being
Speaker 6: nice even though.
Speaker 2: You're screaming at me.
Speaker 1: So let me set the stage. Standing behind this black
Speaker 1: woman who is walking with a cane is a white
Speaker 1: man who's apparently been hormonally altered to appear to be
Speaker 1: a woman, wearing something over his chest, maybe to hide
Speaker 1: whatever scar marks. They've been blasting music. They've been screaming
Speaker 1: in bullhorns in downtown Portland in an attempt to intimidate
Speaker 1: ice officers, in an attempt to drive them crazy, in
Speaker 1: an attempt to get other people to rise up. Like's
Speaker 1: happened in Texas, this is being allowed in Portland, and
Speaker 1: this poor woman lives down there and needs to work.
Speaker 1: And incidentally, there, as I can tell, everyone standing behind
Speaker 1: her is white and she's a bipop. And we were
Speaker 1: told that doesn't happen with Antifa.
Speaker 4: Horn it down way a painful name.
Speaker 1: Right, masked people, one of them earning a bunny outfit.
Speaker 1: By the way, Because guys, if your kids are getting
Speaker 1: into the furry things, get them out. It is an
Speaker 1: absolutely mean If you have a little kid, Okay, little
Speaker 1: kid's two or three years old, likes to dress up
Speaker 1: like a Bundy. Okay, but I'm telling you, and I'm
Speaker 1: warning you, if you have teen kids, particularly teen girls,
Speaker 1: who are being furries, it's an onboarding method to choosing
Speaker 1: your identity to being embarrassed with. Doesn't feel better to
Speaker 1: be hidden, it's grooming. But they would never do this.
Speaker 1: They would never click a button and say get back
Speaker 1: to the streets. Where were these people during Biden? Well,
Speaker 1: everything was hunky dory right when they locked the world down,
Speaker 1: said you can't leave your house, you can't have a job,
Speaker 1: lest you take an injection by big Pharma, none of
Speaker 1: its squares. You had Biden getting us involved in this
Speaker 1: war between Russia and Ukraine, and all of a sudden
Speaker 1: they're good with but they would never operate behind the
Speaker 1: scenes to bring us closer to Mao's third phase of insurrection.
Speaker 1: In the first phase of the insurrection, they seek, they
Speaker 1: sow it in Mao's view and his tactics, to go
Speaker 1: and build bases in the rural areas because it was
Speaker 1: hard to identify them and hard to find them. ANTIFA
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter Incorporated, trained through GAZA, does this in reverse.
Speaker 1: They hide in the urban areas because it's easier to
Speaker 1: hide out in public because ten I don't know half
Speaker 1: these people. The next day go to Starbucks for their jobs,
Speaker 1: so they hide this way. The next phase is to
Speaker 1: have targeted attacks against military targets, sometimes civilian targets. BILOW
Speaker 1: rarely military targets, not for the purpose of military gain,
Speaker 1: not for strategic advantage, not because they think they're going
Speaker 1: to win, but because it adds to the feeling of discontent,
Speaker 1: the feeling of uneasiness, and they're hoping to trigger other
Speaker 1: people to go take these attacks out independently. In phase three,
Speaker 1: you push the enemy in their case, that's us to
Speaker 1: make a decision to commit to warfare or to surrender
Speaker 1: either way to win for them, because it's all about destabilization.
Speaker 1: But no one in our country would ever do this,
Speaker 1: except we've done it to other countries. This technique you're
Speaker 1: witnessing has been done in other countries. Was that ungodly
Speaker 1: when we did it? Yeah? Man, I'm sorry to say
Speaker 1: it was. Destabilizing people's lands is ungodly. How do I know? Well,
Speaker 1: let's look at the Biblical definition of love. The stabilization's
Speaker 1: not in it. Keeping lists of grievances is not in it.
Speaker 1: Jealousy is not in it. Going on I'm people's back
Speaker 1: to so discord not in it. Who does that? The
Speaker 1: enemy does that. We've done ungodly things in other countries.
Speaker 1: The people who lord the power are over others. Liked
Speaker 1: how that felt. So they're doing it here for different ends.
Speaker 1: But they would never do that except they're doing it.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Certainly, Hollywood would never work directly with sources like the
Speaker 1: CIA to program the minds of Americans. That would never happen.
Speaker 1: They would never, for instance, take storylines let's say, oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know vaccines as heroes and produce movie after
Speaker 1: movie after movie about that. Like you know, say, for instance,
Speaker 1: the Brad Pitt movie. It was about the zombies, and
Speaker 1: they were very fast moving zombies, unlike the Walking Dead,
Speaker 1: and the cure in that was to make Brad just
Speaker 1: a little bit sick, in other words, to inoculate him
Speaker 1: against harm. Or say the movie The Girl with All
Speaker 1: the Gifts, which was also vaccine based, where the vaccines
Speaker 1: were the hero. They would certainly never work with the
Speaker 1: news organizations to push things like measles when there was
Speaker 1: absolutely no bumping measles cases, but they pretended there was.
Speaker 1: They would never do that. They would never use Hollywood
Speaker 1: production tactics to take nurses and doctors during one of
Speaker 1: the most deadly pandemics in the world and have them
Speaker 1: go dance for the cameras and well produce TikTok videos
Speaker 1: which all look the same.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: They would never do that. They would never deploy PR
Speaker 1: agents to go out and teach them how to do this.
Speaker 1: Here's the template, here's the music, here's how to dance.
Speaker 1: We'll put the metadata on it. We'll program it in
Speaker 1: TikTok and Twitter so that it does well. They would
Speaker 1: never coordinate that way, right, and yet they did. Now
Speaker 1: there is a studio that draws a lot Angel Studios
Speaker 1: will not make movies that attack our faith. They will
Speaker 1: not make movies that are antecedent to the family. They
Speaker 1: want to promote family values. They want to promote faith.
Speaker 1: They will not be told by Hollywood you can't produce
Speaker 1: say the Sound of Freedom. We won't let you. They
Speaker 1: did it. They wouldn't be told by Hollywood. Hey Dairy
Speaker 1: to put the movie King of Kings out while snow
Speaker 1: Whites in the theaters in Angel Studios said, okay, well,
Speaker 1: this is the story of Jesus Christ as told through
Speaker 1: the animated Charles Dickens speaking to his son. We bet
Speaker 1: the word of God wins, and it did. It trounced
Speaker 1: snow White. So there is a studio that set a line.
Speaker 1: They've also drawn this line. They created the Angel Studios
Speaker 1: Premium Guild membership for us to join their film approval team.
Speaker 1: You get to green light films they're turning to us.
Speaker 1: We sign off through vote thumbs up thumbs down on
Speaker 1: the movies they accept. In the pipeline they produce, they
Speaker 1: distribute their promotes. That's an enormous change that none of
Speaker 1: the other studios will do. In addition to that, you
Speaker 1: get two free tickets to any of their theatrical releases.
Speaker 1: You get to stream all their fancarated shows right on
Speaker 1: the spot and including King of Kings. There is no
Speaker 1: loss to this. If you pay for any media subscription, Netflix,
Speaker 1: what have you, you should be paid for this. Angel dot
Speaker 1: com slash todd. That's Angel dot com slash todd. They
Speaker 1: would never coordinate media responses, let's say, with vandalism responses
Speaker 1: right with street art. Not in the era of COVID.
Speaker 1: Let's see welcome to news Nomi Germany, the Gertyfidi reads
Speaker 1: gas the unvaccinated. Jennifer Ruben who used to pretend to
Speaker 1: be a conservative at the Washington Post. Time to come
Speaker 1: down on unvaccinated. Here's another one, different sign, different person,
Speaker 1: Gas the unvaccinated with a Nazi with a Nazi swastika.
Speaker 1: Here's another. The willfully unvapaccinated who wind up on hospitals
Speaker 1: from COVID should not receive priority you from medical care
Speaker 1: over very sick or injured people or as much an
Speaker 1: urgent need of medical care. George ta Kai that's doctor
Speaker 1: or mister Sulu Doug Little. My position is we must
Speaker 1: take the lives of the unvaccinated, make them a total
Speaker 1: misery and just keep escalating exclusions until we crush the resistance,
Speaker 1: break the spirit in order to force compliance, so they're
Speaker 1: learn not to resist government mandates. But I bet you
Speaker 1: he's an anti fascist. I'll bet you he put a
Speaker 1: Ukraine flag up there. Eventually, Mayor Lori Lightfoot, the disgrace
Speaker 1: Mayor of Chicago, who is getting her haircut during all
Speaker 1: this when she's supposed to be getting her haircut. To
Speaker 1: put it simply, if you've been living vaccine free, your
Speaker 1: time is up. If you wish to live life with
Speaker 1: the ease to which you've grown used to doing things,
Speaker 1: the things you love, you must be vaxed. Health orders
Speaker 1: may pose an inconvenience for the unvaccinated, and in fact
Speaker 1: it is inconvenient by design, and they continue, continue, continue,
Speaker 1: Anna Navarro Cordano, former CNN right under a sign that
Speaker 1: says kill the anti vacs. I wish gay Cardono's products. Oh,
Speaker 1: I love gay Cardono's products. Unless you have a legitimate
Speaker 1: medical reason. If you're not vaccinated, I don't want to
Speaker 1: see you, talk to you, work with you, socialize you
Speaker 1: with you, or know you. It's enough. Your personal freedom
Speaker 1: is holding the rest of us hostage. It's selfish and stupid.
Speaker 1: Toronto Star. Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU death beds,
Speaker 1: do not deserve them. I have no empathy for the
Speaker 1: wilfully unvaccinated. Let them die simmering divide over who isn't vaccinated?
Speaker 1: So they would never coordinate this the street graffiti, matching
Speaker 1: the words of politicians, matching the words of headline writers
Speaker 1: that to Toronto Star, they'd never do that cruel, of
Speaker 1: course it is. To this day there are children being
Speaker 1: denied organ transplants because they're not injected. But they would
Speaker 1: never do this. They would never get leftist society to
Speaker 1: a point ever, where a grown man would ridicule a
Speaker 1: teenager who has regretted being trans right. That would never
Speaker 1: happen because then that would be too far. They would
Speaker 1: never do it. So I'm going to show you them
Speaker 1: doing it from the streets of Portland, Oregon, one of
Speaker 1: the cities of love.
Speaker 8: It does not affect you, and it does not hurt you.
Speaker 8: Nothing here hurts you. Why do you care so much
Speaker 8: about other people not doing the way the things that
Speaker 8: you want them to do?
Speaker 1: Because I know people that have beene permanently hard. You know, no,
Speaker 1: you don't have any friends. You just know are not
Speaker 1: killed my.
Speaker 8: Because you have no friends. I guarantee you when you die,
Speaker 8: there will be no one at your funeral.
Speaker 2: Is it?
Speaker 3: If the thirteen year old gets her breath cut off?
Speaker 8: Is that okay? What?
Speaker 5: What?
Speaker 8: What is the reason her breath got cut off?
Speaker 1: And they told her she was a boy?
Speaker 8: Oh the her she was a boy? Maybe she told
Speaker 8: them that she felt like she was a boy. And
Speaker 8: her doctor and everybody said that they don't cut their
Speaker 8: breast off, You stupid. Tell thirteen years old.
Speaker 3: Tell Layla Jane, Tell Leilah Jane.
Speaker 2: You didn't.
Speaker 8: Tage does the puberty lookers or could have stopped?
Speaker 7: Oh the little kids?
Speaker 8: This is what you sound. You sound like a idiot dude.
Speaker 1: Oh, Father, God, thank you for not having me there.
Speaker 1: I fully confess, God help me for saying this. If
Speaker 1: I'd been there, I would have beat the garbage out
Speaker 1: of him for real, and then I would regret it.
Speaker 1: I'm glad I wasn't there. You would never get society
Speaker 1: to a point where that glib smugg roll with his
Speaker 1: beaded necklaces and his latte stands there and tells the
Speaker 1: world that no one has ever cut the breast off
Speaker 1: of a thirteen year old girl who'd been conned into
Speaker 1: believing she was a boy. It never happens. Did you
Speaker 1: see him? Hear him? That has never happened, you effing
Speaker 1: in his That's where they've gotten people. They've also gotten
Speaker 1: people to the point where we're seeing phase two of
Speaker 1: Mao's PHASESM insurrection, and this is where it's time to
Speaker 1: transition to girl of warfare. This comes from parallel narratives
Speaker 1: dot com Phase two next to transition to phase two
Speaker 1: grilla warfare, arms struggle girl of warfare attacks are carefully
Speaker 1: planned for height and effect, but usually not for military purposes.
Speaker 1: Per se In said, Phase two revolutionaries are interested in
Speaker 1: using military force for political purposes. What or who is
Speaker 1: the first target? This is low intensity warfare at this point,
Speaker 1: so the target will likely be an individual or small
Speaker 1: group or police chief for example, or a village chief
Speaker 1: or even a province chief or council. Listen to this.
Speaker 1: Kidnappings or assassinations are tools of the trade, not so
Speaker 1: much because they want to get rid of that person,
Speaker 1: but rather to make a resounding point to what effect,
Speaker 1: to demonstrate to the populace that the insurgents can get
Speaker 1: to the enemy that their force is a real factor
Speaker 1: to be respected at all. Also induces fear in the ranks.
Speaker 1: The first attacks may do a little physical damage to
Speaker 1: the enemy, but psychologically fear is impossible. Mayhem just around
Speaker 1: the corner get stoked. Suddenly formally comfortable officers prommy officials
Speaker 1: begin to fear for their safety. They then may turn
Speaker 1: their forces further inward for a personal protection, which usually
Speaker 1: makes the villages unhappy. What happened to some of our
Speaker 1: Supreme Court nominees after the attempted assassination of Brett Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: seems to me Amy Conye. Barrett changed her rulings, became irrational,
Speaker 1: almost like she was afraid. Another primary reason behind these
Speaker 1: first attacks is to get attention. Basically, when people read
Speaker 1: about the attacks in the newspaper or hear about it
Speaker 1: on the radio by word of mouth, they're going to
Speaker 1: be curious about what is happening. Even if they've never
Speaker 1: heard of the revolutionary movement, they might start thinking about
Speaker 1: it and seek to or more engaging. That initial active
Speaker 1: violence or terrorism demonstrates to the people that revolution is real,
Speaker 1: that its agents are here and they mean business, and
Speaker 1: they can win for villagers already opposed to the government,
Speaker 1: or even those who were neutral. This represents the development
Speaker 1: worth watching, maybe something to hope for, maybe something newer
Speaker 1: and better. From that initial purely political statement, progress towards
Speaker 1: the third and final stage is constantly evolving. In the
Speaker 1: third stage, military objectives rise to the foe. Getting there
Speaker 1: involves a constant escalation of fear through violence. For example,
Speaker 1: an ambush of a patrol might net a weapons cash.
Speaker 1: Then a police station is overrun in the night, netting
Speaker 1: more weapons and ammunition, perhaps information like names of informants.
Speaker 1: They got that during Summer of Love one point zero,
Speaker 1: when the failed mayor Jenny Durkin gave up a police station.
Speaker 1: They got the ideas of cops. They got their wedding rings,
Speaker 1: they got their driver's licenses, they got access to personnel databases,
Speaker 1: they got weapons, they got gas masks, and then they
Speaker 1: got a billion dollars in an uncommissioned police fire station
Speaker 1: as their own. They're back for more, but government officials
Speaker 1: would never allow this, the media would never root for it.
Speaker 1: It's not like the very next story I'm going to
Speaker 1: play for you proves we've reached that point of Mao's
Speaker 1: phases visurrection right there down on the border. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you something right now, with what they're doing in Texas,
Speaker 1: I laugh at people who call Port of Art to
Speaker 1: Mexico unsafe. I have never felt unsafe from part of Arta.
Speaker 1: Now when we went to uh Poota and it's not
Speaker 1: that nasty word, I just don't say, they're right. PoTA Demeta, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I said on the show, I didn't feel safe there.
Speaker 1: And when I went back and talked to people at
Speaker 1: the resort, they're like, yeah, go there, Yeah, the resort
Speaker 1: Puuta Meta, that's cool, but don't go to poot to
Speaker 1: the Meta. What are you doing. Port of Vararta, on
Speaker 1: the other hand, has seven police forces guarding it, two
Speaker 1: of them, two of them attached to tourists.
Speaker 2: Let's go.
Speaker 1: Cartel has said you target tourists, You're done. And I
Speaker 1: go there for stem cell treatment and I did a
Speaker 1: follow up with someone. Now this is new information. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna share names. I'll say one of my closest
Speaker 1: friends hadn't been able to stay on her feet without
Speaker 1: incredible back pain and just insane feelings of unwellness. She
Speaker 1: joined us in Port of Arta at renewed dot Healthcare.
Speaker 1: She the other day spent about eleven hours on her feet.
Speaker 1: She didn't feel the least bit of a problem in
Speaker 1: her back. She didn't feel unwell. And this is maybe
Speaker 1: a month and a half after renew the things I'm
Speaker 1: doing now with my back, and I'm posting a video little,
Speaker 1: just a quick little video of me chatting with the
Speaker 1: CrossFit Games champ fittest man on Earth from last year.
Speaker 1: James Sprague did a personal training session with me yesterday.
Speaker 1: I've been doing online training with him. He is a
Speaker 1: great young Christian man, so filled with the Holy Spirit.
Speaker 1: I'm doing things to my back that prior to my
Speaker 1: last treatment I couldn't have done with my back. If
Speaker 1: it's a neurological issue, if it's things like arthritis you've
Speaker 1: been told will never go away without pills or surgery.
Speaker 1: That doesn't need to be the case. Please go contact
Speaker 1: them that renew R E n U E dot Healthcare.
Speaker 1: Please tell me you're part of the Todd Hermannshaw family.
Speaker 1: It's R E n U E dot Healthcare. They would
Speaker 1: never knowingly walk us up to the last phase of insurrection.
Speaker 1: Mao's three phases from the State of.
Speaker 5: Texas, an officer was shot near an immigration detention facility
Speaker 5: in Alvarado. It happened around eleven last night on Sundflower
Speaker 5: Lane near the Prairie Land Detention Center right now. That
Speaker 5: building is being used by Immigrations and Customs enforcement. Police
Speaker 5: say they were responding to report to a suspicious person.
Speaker 5: That officer saw a person who appeared to be armed,
Speaker 5: and police say when that officer tried to engage with
Speaker 5: that person, they were shot at. The officer was hit
Speaker 5: in the net but survived.
Speaker 1: So more in this story from Fox News that was
Speaker 1: CBS Local in Texas CBS Action Texas from Fox News headline,
Speaker 1: ICE agents targeted in two ambush attacks in recent days.
Speaker 1: Anti government suspects allegedly shot a police officer in the
Speaker 1: neck while carrying propaganda maateurers calling for class war against Ice.
Speaker 1: Class war, maoist war. They say it right there, Class war,
Speaker 1: they say it. US Immigration and Customer Enforcement's agents and
Speaker 1: other law enforcement official officers conducting immigration enforcement have been
Speaker 1: targeted in at least two ambushes in Texas in recent days.
Speaker 1: The Justice Department on Monday named individuals charged with shooting
Speaker 1: a police officer in the neck and opening fire and
Speaker 1: other correctional officers outside the Prairie Land Detention Center in Alvareto, Texas,
Speaker 1: on the fourth of July. The group donning all black
Speaker 1: home really black block imagine that allegedly first began shooting
Speaker 1: fireworks at the facility, which is being used by the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security to hold people related to immigration
Speaker 1: violations and awaiting deportation. Defendants are Cameron Arnold also known
Speaker 1: as Autumn Hill. Oh, a man known as a woman?
Speaker 1: How interesting? Savannah Batton, Nathan Bauman, Zachary Everetts, Joey Gibson,
Speaker 1: probably Joy Gibson. I know Joey Gibson. Bradford Morris also
Speaker 1: known as Megan Morris.
Speaker 8: Oh.
Speaker 1: Really, another dude who pretends to be a woman. How interesting?
Speaker 1: Marcirela Brideaux, Seth Sykes, Elizabeth Soatto, and Anissoto.
Speaker 7: Hey.
Speaker 1: Look some relatives anti gefferent forces. Oh and incidentally, they're
Speaker 1: all pretty white. I would say seven out of ten white.
Speaker 1: And the dudes pretending to be women just look exactly
Speaker 1: like do pretending to be women. Why are there so
Speaker 1: many dudes pretending to be women in ANTIFA? Because revolutionary
Speaker 1: groups always seek the mentally unbalanced or the empty people
Speaker 1: seeking meaning. I'm going to take a wild, wild guess
Speaker 1: that none of them know Jesus Christ, that none of
Speaker 1: them know the love of God. Wild guests. We learned
Speaker 1: during the lockdown phase of the COVID sy op that
Speaker 1: one thing we must wipe out of our lexicon forevermore
Speaker 1: is they would never do that. We're all fallen. We'll
Speaker 1: all fall short of the glory of God. It may
Speaker 1: not be your particular sin that you wave power over others.
Speaker 1: Maybe you don't have power. So let's also remember this,
Speaker 1: as hard as it is. Those who are doing these things,
Speaker 1: there are enemies. And guess what Jesus requires of us
Speaker 1: to love our enemies. Oh, it's not a catch, it's
Speaker 1: not a bug. It's a feature. Because God also told
Speaker 1: us he who extends mercy will receive it. This is
Speaker 1: a Todd Hermannshaw. Please go, be well, be strong, be kind,
Speaker 1: and make a decision today to accept that merciful offer
Speaker 1: of repentance through Jesus Christ.